alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending December 22, 2007

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 25, 2014

No. 04-13-00287-CR

Terry C. TRENTACOSTA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2006CR6469

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine, Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On February 14, 2014, appellant filed a motion titled, “Motion to Record and Transcribe 

the Formal Submission.” The motion is DENIED.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of February, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<RESTATED>
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           8,750
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,483
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     20,095
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          54,146
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            53,976
<LOANS>                                        108,259
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,697
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 207,888
<DEPOSITS>                                     188,712
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,347
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,044
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,785
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 207,888
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,328
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,827
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   354
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,509
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,395
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,446
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,063
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (3)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,905
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,535
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,683
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,683
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .83
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.44
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,467
<LOANS-PAST>                                       837
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,251
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    892
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,855
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      371
<RECOVERIES>                                       213
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,697
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,268
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,429
        

</TABLE>
# C_2012235EN.01000603.xml

| 4.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/6

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg lodged on 8 May 2012 — Caisse nationale des prestations familiales v Bornand, Pierre-Louis

(Case C-217/12)

2012/C 235/11

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Caisse nationale des prestations familiales

Applicant:

Respondent: Bornand, Pierre-Louis

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Does a benefit such as the parental leave allowance provided for by Articles 306 to 308 of the [Luxembourg] Code de la Sécurité Sociale constitute a family benefit within the meaning of Article 1(u)(i) and Article 4(1)(h) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to the members of their families moving within the Community, (1) as amended and updated and applicable in accordance with Annex II, Section A, (1) of the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons and the Final Act signed in Luxembourg on 21 June 1999? (2)

1

2

---

(1)  OJ 1971, L 149, p. 2.

1

(2)  OJ 2002, L 114, p. 6.

2

---
§ 38.20-10 Ventilation—T/ALL. ( a ) A power ventilation system shall be provided for compartments containing pumps, compressors, pipes, control spaces, etc. connected with the cargo handling facilities. These compartments shall be ventilated in such a way as to remove vapors from points near the floor level or bilges, or other areas where vapor concentrations may be expected. The compartments shall be equipped with power ventilation of the exhaust type having capacity sufficient to effect a complete change of air in not more than 3 minutes equal to the volume of the compartment and associated trunks.
( b ) The power ventilation units shall not produce a source of vapor ignition in either the compartment or the ventilation system associated with the compartment. Inlets to exhaust ducts shall be provided and located at points where concentrations of vapors may be expected. Ventilation from the weather deck shall be provided. Ventilation outlets shall terminate away from any openings to the interior part of the vessel a lateral distance at least equal to that specified in § 38.20-1(a). These outlets shall be so located as to minimize the possibility of recirculating contaminated air through the compartment.
( c ) Means shall be provided for purging the following spaces of cargo vapors: ( 1 ) The space surrounding nonpressure vessel type tanks, i.e., within the secondary barrier.
( 2 ) The space surrounding pressure-vessel type tanks whose piping connections are below the weather deck in accordance with § 38.10-1(h).
( 3 ) The space surrounding tanks whose manhole openings are below the weather deck in accordance with § 38.05-10(f).
( d ) Power ventilation shall be provided for each auxiliary machinery or working space located on and accessible from the cargo handling deck. Such ventilation systems shall be designed to preclude the entry of cargo vapors into the space via the open access or the ventilation system itself.
[CGFR 66-33, 31 FR 15269, Dec. 6, 1966, as amended by CGFR 68-65, 33 FR 19985, Dec. 28, 1968]
#### § 35.01-15 Carriage of persons other than crew—TB/ALL.

No person not connected with the operation of a tank ship or tank barge or not having legitimate business with said vessel, shall be permitted aboard while vessel is under way unless specifically allowed by its certificate.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2506 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to ensure the members of the Armed 

Forces receive mandatory hearing screenings before and after deployments and to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to mandate that 

tinnitus be listed as a mandatory condition for treatment by the Department of Veterans Affairs Auditory Centers of Excellence and that research on the preventing, treating, and curing of tinnitus be conducted. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2009 

Mr. TEAGUE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed 

Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to ensure the members 

of the Armed Forces receive mandatory hearing 

screenings before and after deployments and to direct 

the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to mandate that 

tinnitus be listed as a mandatory condition for treatment 

by the Department of Veterans Affairs Auditory Centers 

of Excellence and that research on the preventing, treating, and curing of tinnitus be conducted. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2506 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Hearing and 

3 Assessment Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

5 It is the sense of Congress that tinnitus is one of the 

6 leading service-connected disability issues that is not being 

7 addressed. 

8 SEC. 3. MANDATORY HEARING EVALUATIONS FOR MEM9 BERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

10 The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that each 

11 member of the Armed Forces receives a hearing evaluation 

12 that includes a screening for tinnitus before the member 

13 is deployed and after the member returns from a deploy14 ment. 

15 SEC. 4. RESEARCH AND TREATMENT OF TINNITUS BY SEC16 RETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

17 (a) RECOGNITION.—The Secretary of Veterans af18 fairs shall recognize tinnitus as a mandatory condition for 

19 research and treatment by the Department of Veterans 

20 Affairs Auditory Centers of Excellence. 

21 (b) RESEARCH.—The Secretary for Veterans Affairs 

22 shall ensure that research is conducted at Department of 

23 Veterans Affairs facilities on the prevention, treatment, 

24 and curing of tinnitus. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending September 8, 2007

|Filer                 | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                          
|--------------------- | ----------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|DANVERS BANCORP, INC. | * 3A1       | Danvers Bancorp, Inc., Danvers, Massachusetts (Danvers Bancorp) to acquire 100% of the outstanding capital stock of Danversbank, Danvers, Massachusetts pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the BHC Act, in connection with the reorganization of Danvers Bancorp from mutual to stock form. | Newspaper:09/28/2007Federal Register:10/09/2007
|Newspaper:            | 09/28/2007 
|Federal Register:     | 10/09/2007 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 23.1 - Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-10435) pertaining to the Affinity Technology Group, Inc. 1995 Stock
Option Plan, 1996 Stock Option and the Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option
Plan, of our report dated March 15, 2004, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Affinity Technology Group, Inc. included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.





                                                         /s/  SCOTT McELVEEN LLP


Columbia, South Carolina
March 15, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2559 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2559

  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out a national 
 media campaign directed at homeless veterans and veterans at risk for 
                           becoming homeless.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 21, 2009

 Mr. Hare (for himself, Ms. Berkley, Mr. Filner, Mr. Hall of New York, 
  Mrs. Halvorson, Mr. Nye, Mr. Teague, and Mr. Rooney) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out a national 
 media campaign directed at homeless veterans and veterans at risk for 
                           becoming homeless.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Help Our Homeless Veterans Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL MEDIA CAMPAIGN DIRECTED AT HOMELESS VETERANS.

    (a) National Media Campaign.--Under the authority of section 532 of 
title 38, United States Code, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall 
carry out a national media campaign targeted at veterans who are 
homeless or who are at risk of becoming homeless, with special emphasis 
on such veterans who are women. Through the media campaign, the 
Secretary shall seek to inform such veterans of--
            (1) their rights and benefits under the laws administered 
        by the Secretary; and
            (2) where to turn for help if they are already homeless or 
        are at risk of becoming homeless.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 149 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 149

 To prohibit the export of satellites intended for launch from launch 
           vehicles owned by the People's Republic of China.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Solomon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the export of satellites intended for launch from launch 
           vehicles owned by the People's Republic of China.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chinese Long March Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON EXPORTS.

    The export of any satellite of United States origin that is 
intended for launch from a launch vehicle owned by the People's 
Republic of China is prohibited.
                                 <all>
```
YUNEEQ Q500 TYPHOON NORMAL CHECKLIST

YUNEEC Q500 CHECKLIST REV. 01

03/2015

PREFLIGHT

SITE INSPECTION COMPLETE

AIRCRAFT AIRWORTHINESS INSPECTION COMPLETE

CREW BRIEFING COMPLETE

VISUAL OBSERVER (IF REQ) IN POSITION

TRANSMITTER POWER SWITCH SELECTED ON

TRANSMITTER POWER-UP INITIALIZATION COMPLETE

TRANSMITTER BATTERY STATUS CHECKED

AIRCRAFT POWER SWITCH SELECTED ON

AIRCRAFT POWER-UP INITIALIZATION COMPLETE

AIRCRAFT BATTERY STATUS CHECKED

GPS SATALLITE AVAILABLITY CHECKED

VIDEO LINK CHECKED

VIDEO CONTROLS CHECKED

ANGLE MODE CONTROL CHECKED

GPS FLIGHT MODE CHECKED

AIRCRAFT LED STATUS LIGHTS CHECKED

POWER UP

FLIGHT MODE SET / AS REQ

PROPELLER AREA ”CLEAR PROPS”

BACK UP TIMER STARTED

START / STOP SELECTOR PRESSED

ALL MOTORS ENERGIZED CHECKED

BEFORE TAKEOFF

TRANSMITTER BATTERY POWER CHECKED

AIRCRAFT BATTERY POWER CHECKED

AFTER TAKEOFF

FLIGHT CONTROL RESPONSE CHECKED

BEFORE LANDING

LANDING ZONE “CLEAR LANDING ZONE”

AFTER LANDING

START / STOP SELECTOR STOP

MOTOR POWER DOWN VERIFIED

AIRCRAFT POWER SWITCH OFF

TRANSMITTER POWER SWITCH OFF

POST FLIGHT INSPECTION COMPLETE
*******YUNEEQ Q500 TYPHOON*******

EMERGENCY / ABNORMAL CHECKLIST

YUNEEC Q500 CHECKLIST REV. 01

03/2015

ON GROUND

ONE OR MORE MOTOR(S) FAIL TO START SELECT STOP BUTTON

REFERENCE TROUBLESHOOT GUIDE

ABNORMAL LED INDICATION REFERENCE LED STATUS GUIDE

AND TROUBLESHOOT GUIDE

IN FLIGHT

VIDEO LINK LOSS LAND AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE

ORIENTATION LOSS SELECT HOME MODE

GPS INTEGRITY LOSS SELECT ANGLE MODE

BATTERY STATUS WARNING LAND IMMEDIATELY AT

NEAREST SUITABLE LOCATION

DITCHING AIRCRAFT SELECT STOP BUTTON [3 SECONDS]
Argued and submitted June 28,

judgment of conviction vacated October 11,1995

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*MARELENE S. DIKEMAN, *Appellant.*

(DC9411671; CA A85602)

903 P2d 418

Eric M. Cumfer, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Judgment of conviction vacated. *State v. Rudder/Webb,*137 Or App 43, 903 P2d 393 (1995).
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 40819 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
LIONEL SANCHEZ

- CAMACHO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:19

- CR

- 765

- 1

Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Lionel Sanchez

Camacho has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sanchez

- Camacho has filed a response. We have
reviewed coun sel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein , as well as Sanchez

- Camacho ’ s response . We concur with counsel’s

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 7, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-40819 Document: 00515374675 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/07/2020No. 19

- 40819

2 assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for lea ve to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 19-40819 Document: 00515374675 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/07/2020
#### Brady Searles, Respondent, *v.*Benjamin Buckhout, Appellant.

Motion denied, with ten dollars.costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
#### § 39.2015 Tank barge pressure-vacuum indicating device—B/ALL.

A fixed pressure-sensing device must be installed as close as practicable to the vessel vapor connection on a tank barge with a vapor collection system. The pressure-sensing device must measure the pressure vacuum in the main vapor collection line and have a pressure indicator located where the cargo transfer is controlled.
#### Henry Bostwick, *Receiver, etc., Respondent, v.*Samuel L. Van Voorhis, *sole Executor, etc., Appellant*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
p130796to0800_ceb_srer_2013sept20

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0796 0797, 0798, 0799, 0800 Standard Review Draft 9/20/2013

ENGINEER: Prothero \ JAS PV (kg/yr):

Page 1p130796to0800_ceb_srer_2013sept20

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0796 0797, 0798, 0799, 0800

Page 2p130796to0800_ceb_srer_2013sept20

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0796 0797, 0798, 0799, 0800

Page 3p130796to0800_ceb_srer_2013sept20

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0796 0797, 0798, 0799, 0800

Page 4p130796to0800_ceb_srer_2013sept20

Page 5
§ 42.13-25 Load line mark. ( a ) The load line mark shall consist of a ring 12 inches in outside diameter and 1 inch wide which is intersected by a horizontal line 18 inches in length and 1 inch in breadth, the upper edge of which passes through the center of the ring. The center of the ring shall be placed amidships and at a distance equal to the assigned summer freeboard measured vertically below the upper edge of the deck line (as illustrated in Figure 42.13-25(a)).
Figure 42.13-25(a) —Load line mark and lines to be used with this mark
[CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10059, July 12, 1968]