alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS, INC.

    EXHIBIT 21      List of Subsidiaries
    --------------------------------------------

    State of Incorporation - Arizona
              Drake Management Services, Inc.

    State of Incorporation - Georgia
              Culinary Solutions, Inc.

    State of Incorporation - Illinois
              Morrison Holding Company

    State of Incorporation - Tennessee
              Culinary Concepts, Inc.

    State of Incorporation - Pennsylvania
              Culinary Services Network
              Custom Management Corporation
              Custom Management Corporation of Pennsylvania
              Morrison Custom Management Corporation of Pennsylvania
              John C. Metz & Associates, Inc.

    State of Incorporation - Texas
              Morrison's Health Care of Texas, Inc.
Director Compensation Summary Sheet



  
 Exhibit 10.19

  
 Director Compensation Summary Sheet 
  

	 	1.	Retainers: 

  

	 	a.	Chair of Board of Directors / Executive Committee Chair: 

  

	 	i.	$100,000 per annum 

  

	 	ii.	no additional retainers compensation for services 

  

	 	b.	Member Directors: 

  

	 	i.	$45,000 per annum 

  

	 	c.	Committee Chairs: 

  

	 	i.	Audit Committee Chair - $10,000 

  

	 	ii.	Other Committees, including Organization and Compensation, Nominating and Governance, however excluding Executive Committee - $3,000 

  

	 	d.	All retainers shall be paid quarterly in advance of the calendar quarter 

  

	 	2.	Meeting Fees: 

  

	 	a.	Each Director, including the Chair of the Board, shall be paid $2,000 for each full Board or Committee meeting attended in person and $1,000 for each full Board or Committee meeting
attended telephonically, provided, however, in the event a director attends two or more meetings on the same calendar day, the fee for each meeting attended after the first shall be $1,000 per meeting and the maximum daily fee earned shall not
exceed $4,000. 

  

	 	b.	All meeting fees shall be paid quarterly in arrears. 

  

	 	3.	An employee Director shall not be entitled to receive any retainer or meeting fees, set forth above.
**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| 1. | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  Registrant. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                Richard Rallo       |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Richard                Rallo           |
|   | Chief                Financial Officer |

**A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been      provided to American Medical Alert Corp. and will be retained by American      Medical Alert Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission      or      its staff upon request.**

----
32.2
            CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350.





I,
Timothy G. Byrd Sr., the Chief Financial Officer of Adino Energy Corporation,
hereby certify that to my knowledge, Adino Energy Corporation’s quarterly report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the periodic report on Form 10-Q and the
financial statements contained therein fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of Adino Energy
Corporation.





Date:
August 11, 2010





/s/ Timothy G. Byrd, Sr.Timothy
      G. Byrd, Sr.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23
- 10193 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Myron Lynn Matthews, Jr.,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22
- CR
- 275 - 1

**____________ __________________**  Before **Davis, Ho,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Myron Lynn Matthews, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Matthews has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 28, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-10193 Document: 00516981152 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/28/2023No. 23
- 10193

2 concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further re sponsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 23-10193 Document: 00516981152 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/28/2023
#### § 32.75-5 Hull requirements; general—TB/ALL.

The scantlings, material, and workmanship, and the fitting and fastening of parts shall be at least equivalent to the requirements of a recognized classification society for the particular service specified in the application for certificate of inspection and permit for the transportation of liquid flammable cargoes in bulk as of the date when the tank vessel was built, or as of the date when the vessel was converted into a tank vessel. In the absence of such classification requirements, the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, shall satisfy himself that the vessel's structure as specified in this section is safe for the service to be specified in its certificate of inspection.
§ 56.50-20 Pressure relief piping. ( a ) *General.* There must be no intervening stop valves between the pressure vessel or piping system being protected and its protective device or devices, except as authorized by the Marine Safety Center.
( b ) *Discharge lines.* (Reproduces 122.6.2(d).) Discharge lines from pressure-relieving safety devices must be designed to facilitate drainage.
( c ) *Stop valves.* Stop valves between the safety or relief valve and the point of discharge are not permitted, except as specifically approved by the Marine Safety Center.
( d ) *Reference.* See also § 56.07-10(a) and (b) for specific requirements.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18843, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGFR 69-127, 35 FR 9979, June 17, 1970; CGD 77-140, 54 FR 40607, Oct. 2, 1989]
§ 42.07-5 Marks placed on vessel to indicate load lines. ( a ) Load line marks to indicate the maximum amidship's draft to which a vessel can be lawfully submerged, in the various circumstances and seasons, shall be permanently marked on each side of the vessel in the form, manner, and location as required by this subchapter.
( b ) The load line marks placed on a vessel shall be attested to by a valid load line certificate as required by § 42.07-45(b). The issuing authority shall not deliver any required load line certificate to the vessel until after its surveyor has ascertained that the vessel meets the applicable survey requirements and the correct placement of the marks on the vessel's sides has been confirmed.
( c ) The requirements for load line marks apply to all new and existing vessels as specified in §§ 42.03-5 and 42.03-10, except when a vessel has been issued a load line exemption certificate in lieu of a load line certificate.
[CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10052, July 12, 1968, as amended by CGFR 68-126, 34 FR 9012, June 5, 1969]
#### § 35.40-40 Marking and instructions for fire and emergency equipment—TB/ALL.

Lifesaving appliances, instructions to passengers, and stowage locations for all tank vessels must be in accordance with subchapter W (Lifesaving Appliances and Arrangements) of this chapter.

[CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25287, May 20, 1996]
§ 503.38 General prohibition. ( a ) No employee or former employee of the Commission shall, in response to a demand or request, produce any material contained in the files of the Commission, or disclose any information relating to or based upon material contained in the files of the Commission, or disclose any information or produce any material acquired as part of the performance of that person's official duties or because of that person's official status, without prior approval of the Commission in accordance with §§ 503.39 and 503.40.
#### § 56.25-7 Blanks.

Each blank must conform to the design requirements of 104.5.3 of ASME B31.1 (incorporated by reference; see § 56.01-2).

[USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65176, Oct. 31, 2008]
2:02-cv-72955-DPH Doc # 1 Filed 07/19/02 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 1
2:02-cv-72955-DPH Doc # 1 Filed 07/19/02 Pg 2 of 5 Pg ID 2
2:02-cv-72955-DPH Doc # 1 Filed 07/19/02 Pg 3 of 5 Pg ID 3
2:02-cv-72955-DPH Doc # 1 Filed 07/19/02 Pg 4 of 5 Pg ID 4
2:02-cv-72955-DPH Doc # 1 Filed 07/19/02 Pg 5 of 5 Pg ID 5
The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District 1

Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

___________

No. 96-2389

___________

Aaron Shelton, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Missouri.

United States of America, *

 * (PUBLISHED)

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: March 6, 1997

 Filed: March 24, 1997

___________

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Aaron Shelton appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. 1

§ 2255 motion. In his motion, Shelton alleged his appellate counsel was

ineffective in that he "misled and tricked" Shelton into entering a

conditional guilty plea by indicating he would appeal the denial of

Shelton's suppression motion, and then failing to include this issue in

Shelton's direct appeal.

On direct appeal, Shelton's counsel filed, and we accepted, Shelton's

pro se brief, which raised Shelton's suppression claims. Although our

opinion in that case did not specifically address these arguments, see

United States v. Shelton, 66 F.3d 991 (8th Cir. 1995) (per curiam), cert.

denied, 116 S. Ct. 1364 (1996), we considered and rejected them both on

direct appeal and in denying
-2-

Shelton's pro se petition for rehearing. Therefore, we conclude the

district court did not err in denying Shelton's motion without an

evidentiary hearing. See Engelen v. United States, 68 F.3d 238, 241 (8th

Cir. 1995); United States v. Duke, 50 F.3d 571, 576 (8th Cir.), cert.

denied, 116 S. Ct. 224 (1995).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 57 (Monday, March 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14126-14127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1449]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as

[[Page 14127]]

amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel, EE91 Special Emphasis Panel 
(SEP).
    Date: April 16-17, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications and/or 
proposals.
    Place: Crowne Plaza Silver Spring, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver 
Spring, MD 20910.
    Contact Person: Katrina Foster, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 
National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Room 3037, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 301-443-3037, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c3a8a2b7b1aaada283aea2aaafedadaaabeda4acb5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6f040e1b1d06010e2f020e06034101060741080019">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 12, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1449 Filed 3-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED IN THE  COMPANY'S  FORM 10-K FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                       1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,203,525
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,294,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (500,405)
<INVENTORY>                                    583,894
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,910,075
<PP&E>                                       1,417,238
<DEPRECIATION>                               (415,657)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,313,276
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,998,029
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        3,766,297
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,070
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,198,140
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,313,276
<SALES>                                      5,973,001
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,973,001
<CGS>                                        1,945,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,570,859
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (13,130)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,215,339)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (10,215,339)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                    (612,600)
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,827,939)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.84)
        

</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending May 5, 2007

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending March 29, 2008

|Filer                     | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|CENTRAL BANCORP, INC.     | * 3A3       | Central Bancorp, Inc., Garland, Texas, to acquire 100 percent of Jones County Bank, Haddock, Georgia.                           | Newspaper:03/18/2008Federal Register:04/18/2008
|Newspaper:                | 03/18/2008 
|Federal Register:         | 04/18/2008 
|CTB FINANCIAL CORPORATION | * 3A3       | CTB Financial Corporation, Ruston, Louisiana, to acquire 100 percent of Community Trust Bank of Texas, Dallas, Texas (de novo). | Newspaper:04/16/2008Federal Register:04/14/2008
|Newspaper:                | 04/16/2008 
|Federal Register:         | 04/14/2008 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
# C_2012025EN.01005901.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/59

---

Action brought on 14 November 2011 — Solar-Fabrik v OHIM (Premium XL)

(Case T-582/11)

(2012/C 25/113)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Solar-Fabrik AG für Produktion und Vertrieb von solartechnischen Produkten (Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany) (represented by M. Douglas, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 September 2011 in Case R 245/2011-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 September 2011 in Case R 245/2011-1;

| — | Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘Premium XL’ for goods in Classes 9 and 11

Decision of the Examiner: rejection of the application

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009 as the mark applied for has distinctive character.

---
§ 502.64 Alternative dispute resolution. ( a ) *Mandatory preliminary conference.* ( 1 ) *Participation.* Subsequent to service of a Complaint, parties must participate in a preliminary conference with the Commission's Office of Consumer Affairs and Dispute Resolution Services (CADRS) as to whether the matter may be resolved through mediation. The preliminary conference may be conducted either in person or via telephone, video conference, or other forum.
( 2 ) *Timing.* Within fifteen (15) days of the filing of an answer, the parties must contact the Director of CADRS to schedule the preliminary conference. The Director of CADRS or his/her designees will conduct the preliminary conference and may confer with each party separately at any time.
( b ) *Continued availability of dispute resolution services to resolve procedural and other disputes.* Pursuant to subpart U of this part, the parties mutually may agree, at any time prior to the termination of a Commission proceeding, to initiate or reopen a mediation proceeding to explore resolution of procedural or substantive issues.
( c ) *Proceeding not stayed during dispute resolution process.* Unless otherwise ordered by the presiding officer, a mediation proceeding does not stay or delay the procedural time requirements set forth by rule or order of the presiding officer.
( d ) *Confidentiality.* The preliminary conference will be confidential. [Rule 64.]
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joseph C. Cahill, Director and CFO of PowerCold Corporation (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: September 15, 2004



/s/ Joseph C. Cahill

Joseph C. Cahill

Director and CFO