alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Dayton Bar Association *v.*Buren.

[Cite as *Dayton Bar Assn. v. Burén*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 271.]

(No. 98-1729

Submitted September 29, 1998

Decided December 30, 1998.)

*273
      *Certo & Larson*and *Peter R. Certo, Jr.,*for relator.

*Per Curiam.*

We concur with the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Burén engaged in a continuing course of deceit, misrepresentation, and neglect of duty to his clients and the bankruptcy court. In addition, Burén has failed to cooperate with disciplinary proceedings. Under these circumstances, disbarment is the appropriate sanction. See, *e.g., Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Churilla*(1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 348, 350, 678 N.E.2d 515, 516-517; *274
      *Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Brown*(1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 345, 678 N.E.2d 513. Buren is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
§ 535.312 Vessel charter party-exemption. ( a ) For purposes of this section, vessel charter party shall mean a contractual agreement between two ocean common carriers for the charter of the full reach of a vessel, which agreement sets forth the entire terms and conditions (including duration, charter hire, and geographical or operational limitations, if any) under which the vessel will be employed.
( b ) Vessel charter parties, as defined in paragraph (a) of this section, are exempt from the filing requirements of the Act and this part.
( c ) The filing fee for optional filing of vessel charter parties is provided in § 535.401(g).
# C_2014142EN.01000801.xml

| 12.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 March 2014 — European Commission v European Parliament, Council of the European Union

(Case C-427/12) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Choice of legal basis - Articles 290 TFEU and 291 TFEU - Delegated act and implementing act - Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 - Article 80(1) - Biocidal products - European Chemicals Agency - Setting of fees by the Commission))

2014/C 142/08

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: B. Smulders, C. Zadra and E. Manhaeve, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: L. Visaggio and A. Troupiotis, Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Moore and I. Šulce, Agents)

Defendants:

Interveners in support of the defendants: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, E. Ruffer and D. Hadroušek, Agents), Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: V. Pasternak Jørgensen and C. Thorning, Agents), French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues, D. Colas and N. Rouam, Agents), Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: M. Bulterman and M. Noort, Agents), Republic of Finland (represented by: H. Leppo and J. Leppo, Agents), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: C. Murrell and M. Holt, Agents, and by B. Kennelly, Barrister)

Interveners in support of the defendants:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment — Article 80(1) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products (OJ 2012 L 167, p. 1), in so far as it provides for the adoption of measures setting the fees payable to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) by an implementing act under Article 291 TFEU and not by a delegated act in accordance with Article 290 TFEU — Choice of legal basis — Attribution of the regulatory powers which the EU legislature may confer on the Commission.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the French Republic, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Finland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own respective costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the French Republic, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Finland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own respective costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 355, 17.11.2012.

1

---
#### § 193.15-50 Clean agent systems.

A clean agent system complying with 46 CFR subpart 95.16 may be used as an alternative to a carbon dioxide fire extinguishing system.

[USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33893, June 7, 2012]
# National Hurricane Preparedness Week, 2007

Each year, millions of Americans living in coastal areas are faced with the hazards of hurricanes. As hurricane season approaches, National Hurricane Preparedness Week provides an opportunity to raise awareness of steps that can be taken to help protect our citizens, and their communities and property. 

Hurricanes can be devastatingly powerful and include storm surge, high winds, tornadoes, and flooding. To reduce the potentially deadly effects of these storms, it is imperative for people in hurricane-prone areas to prepare for each type of hurricane hazard. Taking the time to develop a family disaster plan, create a disaster supply kit, and stay aware of current weather situations can improve preparedness and help save lives. 

My Administration is committed to strengthening our Nation's ability to prepare for, respond to, and recover from these types of disasters. I've asked the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to find ways to provide better assistance to those affected by catastrophe. FEMA has enhanced coordination between all levels of government during times of crisis and, along with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, is helping raise awareness about the dangers of hurricanes. In addition, the Department of Homeland Security and FEMA provide Americans with important emergency preparation checklists and valuable resources about what to do after a disaster at ready.gov and fema.gov. By working together, citizens and Federal, State, local, and tribal officials can help safeguard lives and protect property. 

Throughout the hurricane season, we are also grateful for the compassion, courage, and generosity of the volunteers and first responders who stand ready to help their neighbors in need. Their good hearts reflect the character of our Nation. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 20 through May 26, 2007, as National Hurricane Preparedness Week. I call upon government agencies, private organizations, schools, and the media to share information about hurricane preparedness. I also urge all Americans living in vulnerable coastal areas of our Nation to take appropriate measures and precautions to protect themselves against the effects of hurricanes. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighteenth day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 07-2582

Billing code 3195-01-P
§ 44.05-1 General. ( a ) The load line regulations in this part are complementary to those in part 42 or part 45 (Great Lakes load line regulations) of this subchapter, as reference is made thereto.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16755, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10076, July 12, 1968]
#### § 308.519 Standard optional endorsement No. 2, Form MA-300-B.

Standard Optional Endorsement No. 2, which may be obtained from MARAD's underwriting agent or MARAD, amends the policy to cover shipments made to the Assured or shipped by the Assured as agent for the account and risk of a principal. Application for Standard Optional Endorsement No. 2 may be made to the Underwriting Agent, which is authorized to issue the endorsement without prior approval of the Maritime Administrator.
#### Jacob Williams, *Respondent, v.*Hannah Williams, Appellant.

Order of Special Term affirmed.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending November 18, 2006

|Filer                           | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                                 
|------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC, THE | FBSEA          | The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, Edinburgh, Scotland to establish a branch at 600 Steamboat Road, Greenwich, Connecticut pursuant to section 211.24(a)(1) of Regulation K. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                      | Not available 
|Federal Register:               | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2423 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 

at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, as the ‘‘George P. Kazen 

Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’, and to designate the 

jury room in that Federal building and United States courthouse as 

the ‘‘Marcel C. Notzon II Jury Room’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2009 

Mr. CUELLAR (for himself, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, and Mr. MCCAUL) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, 

as the ‘‘George P. Kazen Federal Building and United 

States Courthouse’’, and to designate the jury room in 

that Federal building and United States courthouse as 

the ‘‘Marcel C. Notzon II Jury Room’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BUILDING DESIGNATION. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building and United 

5 States courthouse located at 1300 Victoria Street in LaVerDate Nov 24 2008 23:40 May 15, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2423.IH H2423

rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2423 IH

1 redo, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘George P. Kazen Federal Building and United States 

3 Courthouse’’. 

4 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg5 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

6 States to the Federal building and United States court7 house referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be 

8 a reference to the ‘‘George P. Kazen Federal Building and 

9 United States Courthouse’’. 

10 SEC. 2. JURY ROOM DESIGNATION. 

11 (a) DESIGNATION.—The jury room located in the 

12 Federal building and United States courthouse referred 

13 to in section 1 shall be known and designated as the 

14 ‘‘Marcel C. Notzon II Jury Room’’. 

15 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg16 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

17 States to the jury room referred to in subsection (a) shall 

18 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Marcel C. Notzon 

19 II Jury Room’’. 

20 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

21 This Act shall take effect on the first day on which 

22 George P. Kazen is no longer serving as a Federal judge. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

Case No. 14-mc-51593 

vs. HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

RASMIEH ODEH, 

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ADMISSION AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT

OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [#1] 

Presently before the Court is the National Lawyers Guild’s (“NLJ”) Motion for Admission

as Amicus Curiae in Support of Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration, filed on November 20,

2014. The Government has filed a Response to the NLJ’s Motion for Admission as Amicus Curiae

and the NLJ has filed a Reply in support of its request to appear as Amicus Curiae in the instant

matter. 

This Court has broad discretion in determining whether to allow admission as Amicus Curiae

to assist the court. Northern Sec. Co. v. United States, 191 U.S. 555 (1903); United States v.

Michigan, 940 F.2d 143, 165 (6th Cir. 1991). Upon review of the NLJ’s and the Government’s

submissions, the Court finds that its original decision to grant the NLJ’s request to appear as Amicus

Curiae is warranted under the circumstances. 

Accordingly, the NLJ’s Motion for Admission as Amicus Curiae in Support of Motion for

-1-

2:14-mc-51593-GAD-MKM Doc # 7 Filed 12/08/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 57
Reconsideration [#1] is GRANTED. The NLJ is directed to file its amicus brief in case number 13-

20772, United States v. Odeh, forthwith. 

SO ORDERED.

s/Gershwin Drain 

GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: December 8, 2014

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of record on this

date, December 8, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Sakne Chami for Tanya Bankston 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5213

-2-

2:14-mc-51593-GAD-MKM Doc # 7 Filed 12/08/14 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 58
-78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5

 38.0

 38.5

 39.0

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/09

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 09 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
#### § 502.290 Rights of witness.

Any person required to testify or to submit documentary evidence shall be entitled to retain or, on payment of lawfully prescribed cost, procure a copy of any document produced by such person and of his or her own testimony as stenographically reported or, in the depositions, as reduced to writing by or under the direction of the person taking the deposition. Any party compelled to testify or to produce documentary evidence may be accompanied and advised by counsel, but counsel may not, as a matter or right, otherwise participate in the investigation. [Rule 290.]
§ 38.05-25 Refrigerated systems—TB/ALL. ( a ) When a liquefied flammable gas is carried below atmospheric temperature under the requirements of § 38.05-3(f) or § 38.05-4, maintenance of the tank pressure below the maximum allowable pressure shall be provided by one or more of the following means: ( 1 ) A refrigeration or liquefication system which regulates the pressure in the tanks. A standby compressor or equivalent equipment, of a capacity equal to one of the working units shall be provided.
( 2 ) A system whereby the vapors are utilized as fuel for shipboard use.
( 3 ) A system allowing the liquefied flammable gas to warm up and increase in pressure. The insulation and tank design pressure shall be adequate to provide for a suitable margin for the operating time and temperatures involved.
( 4 ) Other systems acceptable to the Commandant.
( b ) A system whereby the vapors are vented to the atmosphere at sea only may be employed in conjunction with paragraph (a)(1) of this section. The pressure control valves shall be independent of the safety relief valves. See § 38.20-1(j).
#### Cleveland Bar Association *v.*Johnson.

[Cite as *Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Johnson*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 146.]

(No. 98-1239

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided December 2, 1998.)

*148
      *Joseph G. Schneider*and *Erica L. Eversman,*for relator.

*149
      *Per Curiam.*

We find that Johnson has received adequate notice and the opportunity to plead or respond to the complaint and to participate in the proceedings against him. We further note that recently, in a separate case, we indefinitely suspended Johnson for neglect of entrusted legal matters and failure to assist in an investigation. *Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Johnson*(1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 74, 689 N.E.2d 537. Given the undisputed facts in this case, we agree with the board that disbarment is appropriate.

We therefore adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the board. We hereby permanently disbar Mitchell L. Johnson from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### § 502.57 Service by parties of pleadings and other documents.

Service on all prior commenters must be shown when submitting comments or replies beyond the initial round on a notice of proposed rulemaking. A list of all participants may be obtained from the Secretary of the Commission.

[78 FR 45071, July 26, 2013]
#### § 39.1015 Foreign-flagged tank vessel certification procedures for vapor control system designs—TB/ALL.

As an alternative to meeting the requirements in 46 CFR 39.1013(a), (b), and (c), the owner or operator of a foreign-flagged tank vessel may submit certification by the classification society that classifies vessels under their foreign flags to the Marine Safety Center. Upon receipt of the certification stating that the vapor control system (VCS) meets the requirements of this part, the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI) will endorse the vessel's Certificate of Compliance for foreign-flagged tank vessels.

[USCG-1999-5150, 78 FR 42642, July 16, 2013, as amended by USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58282, Sept. 18, 2020]
Exhibit 23
                                                                    to Form 10-K








                          Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
A. P. Green Industries, Inc.:

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements (No.
33-21012,  33-26035,  33-35475,  and  33-38323)  on  Form  S-8  of A.  P.  Green
Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated February 9, 1998, relating
to the consolidated  statements of financial position of A. P. Green Industries,
Inc.  and  subsidiaries  as of  December  31,  1997 and  1996,  and the  related
consolidated  statements of earnings,  stockholders'  equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the  three-year  period ended  December  31, 1997,  and the
related schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on
Form 10-K of A. P. Green Industries, Inc.




/s/KPMG Peat Marwick

St. Louis, Missouri
March 27, 1998

                                                    
<PAGE>
#### Peter D. Platz, *Respondent, v.*The City of Cohoes, *Appellant*.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.;

Osborn, J., not acting.
I, Kelly Hankinson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Thinkpath Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September
30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Thinkpath Inc.

Date:  November 20, 2006           By:      /S/ KELLY HANKINSON
                                            -------------------
                                            Name:    Kelly Hankinson
                                            Title:   Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Thinkpath Inc. and will be retained by Thinkpath Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CLINT HINEMAN,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 15-CV-11711

v. HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

On July 2, the court granted plaintiff’s counsel’s motion to withdraw (Doc. #8). The

court advised the plaintiff:

Plaintiff is ORDERED to have new counsel file an appearance on or before

August 31, 2015, or to confirm his mailing address and advise the court if he

wishes to proceed pro se. Failure to comply with this order may result in

the matter being dismissed for failure to prosecute.

(Id.) (emphasis added).

New counsel has not filed an appearance on behalf of plaintiff. Nor has plaintiff

confirmed his mailing address or advised the court whether he wishes to proceed pro se. 

Accordingly, this matter is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 2, 2015

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

September 2, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and

also on Clint Hineman, 17186 Flora Street,

Melvindale, MI 48122.

s/Barbara Radke

Deputy Clerk

2:15-cv-11711-GCS-EAS Doc # 9 Filed 09/02/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 179
#### § 307.19 Penalties.

The owner or operator of a vessel in the waterborne foreign commerce of the United States is subject to a penalty of $162 for each day of failure to file an AMVER report required by this part. Such penalty shall constitute a lien upon the vessel, and such vessel may be libeled in the district court of the United States in which the vessel may be found.

[88 FR 89559, Dec. 28, 2023]
§ 221.5 Citizenship declarations. ( a ) Pursuant to 46 U.S.C. 31306(a), when an instrument transferring an interest in a Documented Vessel owned by a Citizen of the United States is presented to the United States Government for filing or recording, the Person filing shall submit therewith Maritime Administration Form No. MA-899 so it may be determined if 46 U.S.C. 56101 and 56103 apply to the transaction. Form No. MA-899 is available from the Coast Guard Documentation Office at the port of record of the vessel or from the Vessel Transfer Officer.
( b ) The filing required by paragraph (a) of this section is not required for transactions involving vessel types described in § 221.11(b)(1)(i) through (iv) of this part.
( c ) The filing required by paragraph (a) of this section is waived for transactions which are given general approval in this part.
( d ) If the transfer of interest is one which requires written approval of the Maritime Administrator, the Person filing shall submit therewith evidence of that approval.
( e ) A declaration filed by any Person other than an individual shall be signed by an official authorized by that Person to execute the declaration.
[57 FR 23478, June 3, 1992, as amended at 78 FR 35771, June 14, 2013]