alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

CORRINE BAKER, 

Petitioner, Civil No. 2:15-CV-11629 

HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH 

v. 

SHAWN BREWER, 

Respondent. 

_________________________________/ 

OPINION AND ORDER (1) GRANTING THE MOTION TO AMEND THE 

PETITION, (2) SETTING DEADLINE FOR RESPONDENT TO FILE A 

SUPPLEMENTAL ANSWER AND (3) SETTING DEADLINE FOR A 

REPLY BRIEF 

Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 2254, through her counsel David S. Steingold, challenging her 

conviction for second-degree murder and second-degree child abuse. The 

petition was held in abeyance during the pendency of her request for a 

review of her criminal conviction by the Michigan Attorney General Office’s 

Conviction Integrity Unit. (CIU). The case was reopened following 

completion of that review. 

Petitioner has now filed a notice of newly discovered evidence, which 

is construed as a motion to amend the habeas petition. The motion to amend 

is granted. Respondent shall file a supplemental answer to this amended 

Case 2:15-cv-11629-GCS-RSW ECF No. 27 filed 09/03/20 PageID.3252 Page 1 of 2
2 

petition within 60 days of this order. Petitioner has 45 days following the 

filing of the state’s answer to file a reply brief if she so chooses. 

Petitioner’s proposed amended habeas petition should be granted 

because it advances claims that may have arguable merit. See e.g. Braden 

v. United States, 817 F.3d 926, 930 (6th Cir. 2016). 

Respondent shall file an answer to the amended petition within sixty 

days of the Court’s order. See Erwin v. Elo, 130 F. Supp. 2d 887, 891 (E.D. 

Mich. 2001); 28 U.S.C. § 2243. Petitioner has forty five days from the receipt 

of the answer to file a reply brief, if she so chooses. See Rule 5(e) of the 

Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. 

ORDER 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motion to amend the petition for a writ of habeas corpus 

is GRANTED. 

(2) Respondent shall file a supplemental answer within sixty (60) 

days of the date of this order or show cause why they are unable 

to comply with the order. 

(5) Petitioner shall have forty five days from the date that she 

receives the answer to file a reply brief. 

Dated: September 3, 2020 s/George Caram Steeh 

 GEORGE CARAM STEEH 

 United States District Judge 

Case 2:15-cv-11629-GCS-RSW ECF No. 27 filed 09/03/20 PageID.3253 Page 2 of 2
Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW   ECF No. 34-10, PageID.413   Filed 01/09/17   Page 1 of 4

Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW   ECF No. 34-10, PageID.414   Filed 01/09/17   Page 2 of 4

Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW   ECF No. 34-10, PageID.415   Filed 01/09/17   Page 3 of 4

Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW   ECF No. 34-10, PageID.416   Filed 01/09/17   Page 4 of 4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          31,759
<SECURITIES>                                    18,031
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,467
<ALLOWANCES>                                       963
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                80,627
<PP&E>                                          10,881
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,245
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,359
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,315
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,321
<SALES>                                         50,855
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,342
<CGS>                                            2,896
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,211
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                50,010
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   669
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  76
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,909
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,817
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,092
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,092
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
        

</TABLE>
§ 46.10-1 Relaxation from regulations. ( a ) New passenger vessels making foreign voyages by sea shall comply with the requirements in this part. An existing passenger vessel engaged in foreign voyages by sea may be permitted relaxation from the requirements of this part if, in the opinion of the Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, such requirements are unreasonable or impracticable.
( b ) A new passenger vessel making coastwise voyages by sea or making Great Lakes voyages shall comply with the requirements in this part. An existing passenger vessel making coastwise voyages by sea or Great Lakes voyages may be permitted relaxation from the requirements of this part if, in the opinion of the Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, such requirements are unreasonable or impracticable.
#### Rio Grande Western Railway Company, Appellant, v. Chamberlin, Appellee.

Constitutional Law.

Tlie railroad stock-killing statute is unconstitutional.

*Appeal from the County Court of Mesa County.*

Mr. Charles F. Caswell, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Thomson, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Chamberlin, the plaintiff below, recovered a judgment of $80.00 against the defendant company for killing a cow worth $40.00. The recovery was had under our stock-killing stat*150ute, which has been repeatedly held by the supreme court and this court to be unconstitutional. *Wadsworth v. Railway Co.,*18 Colo. 600; *Railway Co. v. Outcalt,*2 Colo. App. 395; *Railway Co. v. Vaughn,*3 Colo. App. 465. Upon proof that the animal was killed through the negligence of the defendant, plaintiff would be entitled to judgment for its value, and no more; and, if the cause is tried again, such proof must be forthcoming, or the plaintiff’s case must fail. The judgment is reversed.

*Reversed.*
# C_2010128EN.01009401.xml

| 18.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/94 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/94

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European Regional Development Fund as regards the eligibility of housing interventions in favour of marginalised communities’

COM(2009) 382 — 2009/0105 (COD)

(2010/C 128/16)

Rapporteur-general: Mr GRASSO

Mr GRASSO

On 11 September 2009, the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 262 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European Regional Development Fund as regards the eligibility of housing interventions in favour of marginalised communities

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European Regional Development Fund as regards the eligibility of housing interventions in favour of marginalised communities

COM(2009) 382 – 2009/0105 (COD).

On 29 September 2009 the Committee Bureau instructed the Section for Economic and Monetary Union and Economic and Social Cohesion to prepare the Committee's work on the subject.

Given the urgent nature of the work, the European Economic and Social Committee appointed Mr Grasso as rapporteur-general at its 457th plenary session, held on 4 and 5 November 2009 (meeting of 5 November 2009), and adopted the following opinion by 70 votes to 2 with 1 abstention.

1.   Conclusions

1.1.   The EESC notes the Commission's proposal to amend Article 7(2) of the ERDF Regulation (1) because practical experience has shown that the conditions of eligibility it contains do not fully fit needs on the ground.

1

1.2.   The EESC approves the proposal.

2.   Reasons and recommendations

2.1.   The EESC hopes that the provisions in this proposal will apply to all marginalised communities, not only to the community specifically mentioned in its recitals. As a matter of principle, these provisions should also apply in all EU Member States.

2.2.   The EESC believes it would be worthwhile to extend the provisions of this proposal, which should apply both to the replacement of existing dwellings with new buildings and to the renovation of existing dwellings, securing energy savings and ensuring sustainability in the process.

2.3.   The EESC welcomes the simplifications, but would in general caution against making too many changes to the legislation over a single programming period, as this could lead to greater administrative uncertainty for the parties involved when the rules change during this period.

Brussels, 5 November 2009

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Mario SEPI

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 397/2009, OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p. 1.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28706]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2545]



[[Page 28706]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and skin 
Diseases special Grants Review Committee.
    Date: June 19-20, 2007.
    Time: 7:30 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Gaithersburg Marriott Courtyard, Washingtonian Center, 
204 Boardwalk Place, Gaithersburg, MD 20878.
    Contact Person: Helen Lin, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, 
NIH/NIAMS/RB, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800, Plaza One, Bethesda, 
MD 20817, 301-594-4952, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aac6c3c4c29beac7cbc3c684c4c3c284cdc5dc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ec80858284ddac818d8580c2828584c28b839a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 14, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2545 Filed 5-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,006
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,145
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     79,588
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                99,739
<PP&E>                                         134,721
<DEPRECIATION>                                  75,175
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 448,607
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          571,083
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,054
<OTHER-SE>                                    (125,530)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   448,607
<SALES>                                        402,422
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               464,740
<CGS>                                          181,303
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  181,303
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               575,268
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (291,831)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (291,831)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (291,831)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.05)


</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending September 16, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 10-1, PageID.148 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURUSANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Energy Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending May 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 14, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Elliot Maza, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  July 14, 2011
/s/ Elliot MazaElliot MazaChief Financial Officer
DANIEL P. DRY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3328

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 13, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Tatiana Salvador, Judge.

Daniel P. Dry, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, CLARK, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
Materials for 1 pm UARG/OMB Discussion

RobertJ Wayland to

:

Nick Hutson, Kevin Culligan, fellner.christian, johnson.mary

Cc

:

Alex Barron, Paul Balserak, DavidA Evans

From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Nick Hutson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, fellner.christian@epa.gov, johnson.mary@e

Cc: Alex Barron/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Paul Balserak/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, DavidA Evans/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

All -

Attached are the handouts for today's OMB discussion with UARG, which were provided by Bill Wehrum. 

I'm out of the office today, but will try to call-in if I can find a quiet place so that I'm not disruptive to the 

call.

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D.

Leader, Energy Strategies Group

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Mail Code D243-01

RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-1045

Cell: (919) 306-2290

Fax: (919) 541-5450

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

*********************************************************

DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

*********************************************************

OMBFeb13.pdf
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending March 10, 2007

|Filer                              | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      | End of Comment Period                             
|---------------------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INCORPORATED | * 3A5* 3A1    | Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, Columbus, Ohio, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Penguin Acquisition, LLC, also of Columbus, Ohio, to acquire 100 percent of Sky Financial Group, Inc., Bowling Green, Ohio, and thereby indirectly acquire Sky Bank, Salineville, Ohio, and Sky Trust, NA, Pepper Pike, Ohio | Newspaper:03/26/2007Federal Register:03/05/2007   
|Newspaper:                         | 03/26/2007   
|Federal Register:                  | 03/05/2007   
|LNB BANCORP INC.                   | * 3A5         | LNB Bancorp, Inc., Lorain, OH to acquire Morgan Bancorp, Inc., and its wholly-owned bank subsidiary, Morgan Bank, N.A., both located in Hudson, OH pursuant to Section 3(a)(5) of the Bank Holding Company Act.                                                                                                      | Newspaper:04/11/2007Federal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                         | 04/11/2007   
|Federal Register:                  | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 205.1 Purpose.

This part establishes the policy and procedure for parties to use when seeking redress and appeals of audit decisions involving contracts with the Maritime Subsidy Board or the Maritime Administration (MARAD, we, our, or us). A party to a contract (you or your) may appeal MARAD's findings, interpretations, or decisions of annual or special audits.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AERIAL COMMUNICATIONS INC. AS OF DECEMBER
31, 1996 AND FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          35,284
<SECURITIES>                                       622
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,925
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,831
<PP&E>                                          20,573
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,981
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 672,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          119,326
<BONDS>                                        103,743
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,359
<OTHER-SE>                                     366,426
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   672,827
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,026
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,762
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (38,788)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (867)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (37,921)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (37,921)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.56)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 185.203 Notice of hazardous conditions.

Whenever there is a hazardous condition, as defined by § 175.400 of this subchapter, on board the vessel, the owner, master, agent, or person in charge shall immediately notify the Captain of the Port of the port of place of destination and the Captain of the Port of the port or place in which the vessel is located of the hazardous condition.