alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending June 23, 2007

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”), as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Rick
      Berry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/
                RICK BERRYRick
                Berry
              Chief
                Financial OfficerMay
                10, 2007




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. and will be retained by Sanders Morris Harris
      Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
# rA/1.- ~Q 

# to-OL30

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA hasthis proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted 

### Date Response National Business Aircraft Association Eli Coni 

# '-/ ),jotl

- Regional Airline Association Oa\'c Lotterer 

## I.-Jj,J{J1 

# - Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 

# '4)0'1 

# - ATA Craig Fabian 

# y

# I,Jo'l ~
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consolidated Medical Management, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the
--------------------------------------------------------------------
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 1992 AND SECTION 1350 OF 18 U.S.C. 63.
------------------------------------------------------------

I, Timothy G. Byrd, Sr., the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief
PersonNameAccounting Officer of Consolidated Medical Management, Inc. hereby
certify that to my knowledge, Consolidated Medical Management's periodic report
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the periodic report on Form 10-QSB and the
financial statements contained therein fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of Consolidated
Medical Management, Inc.



     Date:  August 20,  2006               /s/ Timothy G. Byrd, Sr.
                                           ----------------------------
                                           Timothy G. Byrd, Sr.,
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           Consolidated Medical Management, Inc.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending July 19, 2008

|Filer               | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                             | End of Comment Period                                 
|------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|ROCKY MOUNTAIN BANK | * Branch       | Rocky Mountain Bank, Wilson, Wyoming, to establish a branch at 890 West Broadway, Jackson, Wyoming; and to relocate its main office from Rock Springs, Wyoming, to Wilson, Wyoming, thereby establishing Rock Springs, Wyoming as a branch. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:          | Not available 
|Federal Register:   | Not applicable
|SECURITY BANK       | * Branch       | Security Bank, to relocate its main office from Pawnee, Oklahoma, to Tulsa, Oklahoma, thereby establishing the Pawnee, Oklahoma location as a branch.                                                                                       | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:          | Not available 
|Federal Register:   | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15                (d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the Company’s financial position and results of                operations. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                            |                                        |                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                                            | **Victory              Energy Corporation** |
|                                       |                                   |                            |
| Date: November              13, 2006  | By:                               | /s/ Jon              Fullenkamp |
|                                            |                                             |
|                                            | Principal              Executive Officer    |
|                                            | Principal Financial and                     |
|                                            | Accounting Officer                          |
§ 58.20-15 Installation of refrigerating machinery. ( a ) Where refrigerating machines are installed in which anhydrous ammonia is used as a refrigerant, such machines must be located in a well-ventilated, isolated compartment, preferably on the deck, but in no case is it permissible to install such machines in the engine room space unless the arrangement is such as to eliminate any hazard from gas escaping to the engine room. Absorption machines using a solution of aqua ammonia and machines using carbon dioxide are exempt from this requirement, provided the maximum charges that might be released in the event of breakage do not exceed 300 pounds.
( b ) Machinery compartments containing equipment for ammonia must be fitted with a sprinkler system providing an effective water spray and having a remote-control device located outside the compartment.
( c ) All refrigeration compressor spaces must be effectively ventilated and drained and must be separated from the insulated spaces by a watertight bulkhead, unless otherwise approved.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1574

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to exclude certain bank products

from the definition of a deposit.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 3, 1995

Mrs. ROUKEMA (for herself, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. VENTO, and Mr. KANJORSKI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to exclude

certain bank products from the definition of a deposit.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bank Insurance Fund

5 and Depositor Protection Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF DEPOSIT.

7 Section 3(l)(5) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act

8 (12 U.S. C. 1813(l)(5) is amended—

9 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘and’’ at

10 the end;
2

HR 1574 IH

1 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period

2 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

3 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub4 paragraph:

5 ‘‘(C) any liability of an insured depository

6 institution that arises under an annuity con7 tract, the income of which is tax deferred under

8 section 72 of the Internal Revenue Code of

9 1986.’’.

10 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

11 The amendments made by section 2 shall apply to

12 any liability of an insured depository that arises under an

13 annuity contract issued on or after the date of enactment

14 of this Act.

Æ
EXHIBIT 99.16

CONSENT OF EXPERT

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the Form
40-F) of Cameco Corporation (the Corporation) to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

I hereby consent to reference to my name and my involvement in the preparation of, or supervision of the preparation of, scientific and
technical information in the following instances:

under the headings Operations and Projects  Uranium Operating Properties
 Inkai, Mineral Reserves and Resources  and Governance  Interest of Experts in the Corporations Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2016 dated March 23, 2017 for the Inkai
property

(collectively the Technical Information) in the Form 40-F, and to the inclusion and
incorporation by reference of information derived from the Technical Information in the Form 40-F.

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such Technical Information in the registration statements (Nos. 333-11736, 333-6180 and 333-139165) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Stock Option Plan,
registration statement (No. 333-196422) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Employee Share Ownership Plan and registration statement (No. 333-200678) on Form F-10.

Sincerely,



|                 |  |                                         
|---------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|/s/ Darryl Clark
|Name:            |  | Darryl Clark, PhD, P. Geo.              
|Title:           |  | Managing Director, Cameco Kazakhstan LLP

Date: March 23, 2017
/7wr

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA# 03-13-00746-CR OFFENSE: 19.02

Thomas Atkinson v. The State of

STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Travis

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 403rd District Court

DATE: 01/22/15 Publish: NO TC CASE #: D-l-DC-12-301480

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Thomas Atkinson v. The State of

STYLE: Texas

PUD SB

CCA#: 1*7/ -/S

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: DbUWT

JUDGE: ^2JaAM^—

Petition CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:_

DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending October 6, 2007

----

EnforcementCowboy State Bancorp, Inc., Ranchester, Wyoming, and Cowboy State Bank  -- cease and desist order dated February 24, 2004, terminated September 19, 2007.					-Announced, October 3, 2007 					

FormsForms  -- final Board review to extend with revision the Interagency Bank Merger Act Application (FR 2070) and to extend without revision the Interagency Notice of Change in Bank Control, Interagency Notice of Change in Director or Senior Executive Officer, and Interagency Biographical and Financial Report (FR 2081a,b,c).					-Approved, September 25, 2007 					(AC)

Regulations And PoliciesSmall Business Credit  -- quinquennial report to Congress on Availability of Credit to Small Businesses. 					-Approved, October 5, 2007 					

Reserve Bank OperationsReserve Bank Operations  -- revisions to the Board's policies and guidelines concerning Reserve Bank operations (S-2634).					-Approved, October 1, 2007 					

Testimony And StatementsIndustrial Loan Companies  -- statement by Scott G. Alvarez, General Counsel, before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs on October 4, 2007.					-Approved, October 3, 2007 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: October 11, 2007
§ 42.03-25 Experimental installations. ( a ) Complete information (including plans, necessary instructions and limitations, if any) on proposed experimental installations affecting any fitting, material, appliance, apparatus, arrangement, or otherwise shall be submitted to the assigning authority for evaluation. After acceptance by the assigning authority, the complete information of such installation shall be forwarded to the Commandant for specific approval prior to installation. Complete information shall also be furnished for any associated installation(s) deemed necessary to prevent endangering the vessel during the trial period of proposed experimental installations.
( b ) The use of approved experimental installations shall be permitted only when in accordance with instructions and limitations as specifically prescribed for such installations by the Commandant.
[CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10050, July 12, 1968]
# C_2011120EN.01001502.xml

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/15

---

Appeal brought on 17 February 2011 by AG against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 16 December 2010 in Case F-25/10 AG v Parliament

(Case T-98/11 P)

2011/C 120/36

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: AG (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by S. Rodrigues, A. Blot and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought by the appellant

Form of order sought by the appellant

| — | Declare the present appeal admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the present appeal admissible;

| — | Annul the order made by the Civil Service Tribunal on 16 December 2010 in Case F-25/10; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the order made by the Civil Service Tribunal on 16 December 2010 in Case F-25/10;

| — | Grant the forms of order sought as regards annulment and indemnity submitted by the appellant before the Civil Service Tribunal; |
| --- | --- |

—

Grant the forms of order sought as regards annulment and indemnity submitted by the appellant before the Civil Service Tribunal;

| — | Order the Parliament to pay the costs of both instances. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Parliament to pay the costs of both instances.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the appellant raises a single plea in law, alleging distortion of the evidence adduced before the Judge at first instance, breach of the principle of legal certainty and infringement of the right to an effective remedy, in that:

| — | there is no document in the file which enables the CST to take the view that the appellant lacked diligence in not having her post forwarded during her end-of-year holidays, during which period the post official came to her home to deliver to her the registered letter from the Parliament with its response to her claim; |
| --- | --- |

—

there is no document in the file which enables the CST to take the view that the appellant lacked diligence in not having her post forwarded during her end-of-year holidays, during which period the post official came to her home to deliver to her the registered letter from the Parliament with its response to her claim;

| — | the CST did not make clear what was to be understood by ‘extended’ holidays; |
| --- | --- |

—

the CST did not make clear what was to be understood by ‘extended’ holidays;

| — | the CST took the view that the non-delivery notice which the appellant found in her letterbox on her return from holiday obviously related to the registered letter from the Parliament with its response to her claim. |
| --- | --- |

—

the CST took the view that the non-delivery notice which the appellant found in her letterbox on her return from holiday obviously related to the registered letter from the Parliament with its response to her claim.

---
§ 52.01-110 Water-level indicators, water columns, gauge-glass connections, gauge cocks, and pressure gauges (modifies PG-60). ( a ) *Boiler water level devices.* Boiler water level devices must be as indicated in PG-60 of Section I of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 52.01-1) except as noted otherwise in this section.
( b ) *Water level indicators.* (Modifies PG-60.1.) ( 1 ) Each boiler, except those of the forced circulation type with no fixed water line and steam line, must have two independent means of indicating the water level in the boiler connected directly to the head or shell. One must be a gage lighted by the emergency electrical system (See subpart 112.15 of subchapter J of this chapter). The secondary indicator may consist of a gage glass, or other acceptable device. Where the allowance pressure exceeds 1724 kPa (250 psig), gage glasses must be of the flat type instead of the common tubular type.
( 2 ) Gage glasses must be in continuous operation while the boiler is steaming.
( 3 ) Double-ended firetube boilers must be equipped as specified in this paragraph (b) and paragraph (e) of this section except that the required water level indicators must be installed on each end of the boiler.
( 4 ) Externally fired flue boilers, such as are used on central western river vessels, must be equipped as specified in paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this section except that float gages may be substituted for gage glasses.
( c ) *Water columns.* (Modifies PG-60.2.) The use of water columns is generally limited to firetube boilers. Water column installations must minimize the effect of ship motion on water level indication. Water columns must be fitted directly to the heads or shells of boilers or drums, or if necessary, connected thereto by a distance piece both at the top and bottom of the water columns. Shutoff valves used in the pipe connections between the boiler and water column must be locked or sealed open. Water column piping must not be fitted inside the uptake, the smoke box, or the casing. Water columns must be fitted with suitable drains. Cast iron fittings are not permitted.
( d ) *Gage glass connections.* (Modifies PG-60.3.) Gage glasses and gage cocks must be connected directly to the head or shell of a boiler as indicated in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( e ) *Gage cocks.* (Modifies PG-60.4.) ( 1 ) When the steam pressure does not exceed 250 psi, three test cocks attached directly to the head or shell of a boiler may serve as the secondary water level indicator.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( f ) *Salinometer cocks.* In vessels operating in saltwater, each boiler must be equipped with a salinometer cock or valve. They must not be attached to the water gage or water column.
( g ) *High-water-level alarm.* Each watertube boiler for propulsion must have an audible and a visible high-water-level alarm. The alarm indicators must be located where the boiler is controlled.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18815, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGD 81-79, 50 FR 9433, Mar. 8, 1985; CGD 83-043, 60 FR 24772, May 10, 1995; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65161, Oct. 31, 2008]