alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014303EN.01005701.xml

| 8.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/57

---

Order of the General Court of 12 June 2014 — Makhlouf and Others v Council

(Joined Cases T-432/11, T-490/11, T-649/11, T-651/11, T-97/12, T-99/12 to T-102/12 and T-446/12) (1)

1

2014/C 303/68

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the joined cases be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 290, 1.10.2011.

1

---
#### Thomas B. Holcomb, *as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v.*Friend H. Holcomb, *Appellant.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinión by

Boardman, J.
#### § 32.56-15 Deck spills—T/ALL.

A coaming or other barrier at least .3 meters (1 foot) higher than adjacent spill containment barrier must be provided to prevent cargo spills from flowing aft of the housefront.
Exhibit 31.2

Cerification of  the

Chief Financial Officer

I, H. Ravi Brar certify that:

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

disclosed in this report any change in the reigstrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have  a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting 

 

Date:  August 14, 2003

/s/ H. Ravi Brar

________________________________

    H. Ravi Brar

    Chief Financial Officer
#### § 201.85 Commencement of functions of Department of Transportation Office of Hearings.

In proceedings handled by the Department of Transportation Office of Hearings, its functions shall attach upon notice of the institution of a formal proceeding involving a prehearing conference and/or a hearing by the Administration.

[G.O. 41, 3d Rev., 29 FR 14475, Oct. 22, 1964; 29 FR 15374, Nov. 17, 1964, as amended at 63 FR 9157, Feb. 24, 1998]
Before the

DEPARTM ENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

INTRA ALASKA BUSH MAIL RATES Docket OST-2003-14694

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE PETITION FOR

ADDITIONAL TIME TO REVIEW AND RESPOND TO

COMMENTS ON SHOW CAUSE ORDER 2010-12-28

Communications with respect to this

document should be addressed to:

Joseph Anzalone, Esq.

Office of General Counsel

United States Postal Service

475 L’Enfant Plaza SW

Washington, DC 20260-1127

joseph.anzalone@usps.gov

Date Filed: February 7, 2011

12 The Postal Service requests additional time to review and potentially respond to comments

to Show Cause Order 2010-12-28. The comme nts in opposition to the proposed bush mail

rates are extensive and require additional time for an adequate review. The Postal Service

requests a reasonable extension of time to re view these objections and prepare a response.

The Postal Service concurs with the Febr uary 22, 2011 extension deadline proposed by

Peninsula Airways, Inc., in its February 4, 2011 filing.

A copy of this request is be ing provided electr onically to the a ffected parties.
Exhibit 99.01


                Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
                          and Chief Executive Officer
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I,  the
undersigned  Chief  Financial Officer of  Pop  N  Go,  Inc.  (the
"Company"),  hereby  certify, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the
Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-Q of the Company  for  the  quarter
ended  December 31,  2002  (the "Report") fully  complies  with  the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange  Act  of
1934   and  that  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.


By:   /s/ Melvin Wyman
          ---------------
          Melvin Wyman
          Chief Financial Officer

Date:    March 12, 2002
# C_2013129EN.01000302.xml

| 4.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/3

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 February 2013 — Carrols Corp. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and Giulio Gambettola

(Case C-171/12 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 51(1)(b) - Community figurative mark Pollo Tropical CHICKEN ON THE GRILL - Application for a declaration of invalidity submitted by the proprietor of the national figurative mark Pollo Tropical CHICKEN ON THE GRILL and the national word mark POLLO TROPICAL - Absolute grounds for invalidity - Bad faith - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 129/05

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Carrols Corp. (represented by: I. Temiño Ceniceros, abogado)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent), Giulio Gambettola (represented by: F. Brandolini Kujman, abogado)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 February 2012 in Case T-291/09 Carrols Corp. v OHIM, by which that Court dismissed an application for annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 May 2009 (Case R 632/2008-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Carrols Corp. and Mr Giulio Gambettola

Carrols Corp.

OHIM

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Carrols Corp. shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Carrols Corp. shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 174, 16.6.2012.

1

---
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending August 25, 2007

----

 None 

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: August 30, 2007
Exhibit
10.31


 


2005
Cash Incentive Plan


 


Purpose:


 


The terms of the 2005 Cash
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) have been established to reward the Company’s
executives and other senior managers for assisting the Company in achieving its
operational goals through exemplary performance. Under the Plan, cash bonuses,
if any, will be based on both the achievement of specified individual and
corporate goals as well as a review of personal performance, which is
determined at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) and/or the Board of Directors (the “Board”).


 


Determination of 2005 Cash
Bonuses:


 


The pool for potential cash
bonuses under the Plan may range from 0% to a maximum of 33% of the recipients
2005 base salary. The target bonuses for participants in the Plan will be based
the achievement of objective Company performance goals. The objective Company
performance goals will be based on meeting certain goals with respect to the
Company’s financial performance, clinical development of product candidates and
entering into collaborations with respect to current and potential product
candidates, as well as other Company performance goals to be determined by the
Compensation Committee. The Board and Compensation Committee reserve the right
to modify these goals, amounts and criteria at any time.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Election Assistance Commission

# AGENCY:

United States Election Assistance Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting. 

# Date and Time:

Thursday, May 17, 2007, 10 a.m.-1 p.m.

# Place:

U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave., NW., Suite 150, Washington, DC 20005 (Metro Stop: Metro Center).

# Agenda:

The Commission will receive updates on the activities of the following: The EAC Standards Board; the EAC Board of Advisors; and the EAC Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC). The Commission will consider other administrative matters.

This meeting will be open to the public.

# For Further Information Contact:

Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 566-3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,

Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-2280 Filed 5-3-07; 3:40 pm]

BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 87 (Monday, May 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 25768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2213]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center on Minority Health and Health 
Disparities Special Emphasis Panel, Endowment Program Review.
    Date: May 29-30, 2007.
    Time: 5 p.m. to 1:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites Hotel, 4300 Military Road, Washington, DC 
20015.
    Contact Person: Lorrita Watson, PhD, National Center on Minority 
Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, 6707 
Democracy Blvd., Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20892-5465, (301) 402-1366, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a1d6c0d5d2cecfcde1cfc2ccc9c58fcfc8c98fc6ced7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d5a2b4a1a6babbb995bbb6b8bdb1fbbbbcbdfbb2baa3">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: April 30, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2213 Filed 5-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Barker *v.*The Rochester National Bank.

Banks organized under the national currency act are subject to the penalty against usury imposed by federal law, and not to that imposed by state law.

Debt, upon Glen. St., *c.*213, s. 3, as amended by Laws of 1872, *c.*12, to recover a penalty. Facts found by the court.

The defendants are a banking corporation, organized under the national currency act, and they claimed that the state law relating to usury was not binding on them. Verdict for the defendants, and motion for a new trial.

*Pastman,*for the plaintiff,

argued that the states, having never surrendered their right to protect their own citizens in all affairs of internal police, can, within their own borders, regulate the rates of interest to be paid on all contracts, and affix penalties, as well as legislate concerning the sale of liquors imported under the authority of the United States and brought within the same, and punish for the traffic against their own statutes, citing *Pierce*v. *The State,*13 N. H. 536; *State*v. *Moore,*14 N. H. 451.

*Soils*and *Worcester Gaffney,*for the defendants.

Stanley, J.

It is settled that congress has power to charter a national bank, as an agency for executing the powers conferred and performing the duties imposed upon it. *M’Culloch*v. *Maryland,*4 Wheat. 316. This power is not subject to state control, and, from its very nature, includes the power to endow the agency with all the faculties necessary to accomplish its object. The power of loaning money is a necessary faculty of a bank, and the rate of interest to be charged is an incident of the loan. Authority to loan *311and to take interest involves the power to fix the rate of interest, and the penalty for taking a greater rate than allowed by law. If a state could fix the rate of interest to be taken by a national bank, it could fix the penalty for taking a greater rate; and if it could fix both the rate and the penalty, it could, practically, destroy the power to take interest, and thus seriously impair, if not wholly destroy, one of the most valuable and important functions of national banks.

The national currency act, being constitutional, is a part of the supreme law, and is binding upon the states and their citizens, and, providing as it does the penalty to which corporations organized under it are subject for taking usurious interest, necessarily renders the state law on this subject inapplicable to them. It follows, then, that this action, having been brought upon the state law, cannot be maintained. *Osborn*v. *U. S.,*9 Wheat. 738; *Weston v. Charleston, 2*Pet. 466; *Brown*v. *Maryland,*12 Wheat. 419; *Dobbins*v. *Erie Co.,*16 Pet. 435, 447; *Bank*v. *Pratt,*115 Mass. 539; *Davis*v. Randall, 115 Mass. 547; *Bank*v. Brown, 72 Pa. St. 209; *Bank*v. Garlinghouse, 22 Ohio 492; *Wiley*v. *Starbuck,*44 Ind. 298; *Higley*v. *Bank,*26 Ohio 75; *Hintermister*v. *Bank,*64 N. Y. 212; *Bank*v. *Dearing,*91 U. S. 29; *Tiffany*v. *Bank,*18 Wall. 409; *Lucas v. Bank,*78 Pa. St. 228; *Bank*v. *Duncan,*6 Peporter 69.

*Judgment on the verdict.*

ClAUK, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
#### § 32.75-1 Application—TB/ALL.

All wood hull tank vessels, the construction or conversion of which was started prior to November 10, 1936, shall conform to the requirements in this subpart.
§ 45.183 Load line requirements for the St. Joseph and Muskegon routes. ( a ) *Load line certificate.* ( 1 ) The load line issued under this subpart must be a limited-service, domestic-voyage load line.
( 2 ) Except as provided under paragraph (b)(2)(vi) of this section, the term of the certificate is 5 years.
( 3 ) The load line certificate is valid for the St. Joseph and Muskegon routes, and intermediate ports. However, operators must comply with the route-specific requirements on the certificate.
( 4 ) The freeboard assignment, operational limitations, and towboat requirements of this subpart must appear on the certificate.
( b ) *Conditions of assignment.* ( 1 ) An initial load line survey under § 42.09-25 of this chapter and subsequent annual surveys under § 42.09-40 of this chapter are required.
( 2 ) At the request of the barge owner, the initial load line survey may be conducted with the barge afloat if the following conditions are met: ( i ) The barge is less than 10 years old;
( ii ) The draft during the survey does not exceed 15 inches (380 millimeters);
( iii ) The barge is empty and thoroughly cleaned of all debris, excessive rust, scale, mud, and water. All internal structure must be accessible for inspection;
( iv ) Gaugings are taken to the extent necessary to verify that the scantlings are in accordance with approved drawings;
( v ) The hull plating (bottom and sides) and stiffeners below the light waterline are closely examined internally. If the surveyor determines that sufficient cause exists, the surveyor may require that the barge be drydocked or hauled out and further external examination conducted; and
( vi ) The initial load line certificate is to be issued for a term of 5 years or until the barge reaches 10 years of age, whichever occurs first. Once this certificate expires, the barge must be drydocked or hauled out and fully examined internally and externally.
[USCG-1998-4623, 67 FR 19690, Apr. 23, 2002, as amended at 75 FR 70604, Nov. 18, 2010]
# C_2012138EN.01000802.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/8

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanța (Romania) lodged on 12 March 2012 — Corpul Național al Polițiștilor — Biroul Executiv Central (on behalf of and in the interest of its members — public officials with a special status — police serving with the IPJ Tulcea) v Ministerul Administrației și Internelor, Inspectoratul General al Poliției Române, Inspectoratul de Poliție al Județului Tulcea

(Case C-134/12)

(2012/C 138/14)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Constanța

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Corpul Național al Polițiștilor — Biroul Executiv Central (on behalf of and in the interest of its members — public officials with a special status — police serving with the IPJ Tulcea (the Tulcea Inspectorate of Police))

Defendant: Ministerul Administrației și Internelor, Inspectoratul General al Poliției Române, Inspectoratul de Poliție al Județului Tulcea

Questions referred

| 1. | Must the provisions of Articles 17(1), 20 and 21(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as precluding reductions in remuneration such as those imposed by the Romanian State under Law No 118/2010 and Law No 285/2010? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must the provisions of Articles 17(1), 20 and 21(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as precluding reductions in remuneration such as those imposed by the Romanian State under Law No 118/2010 and Law No 285/2010?

| 2. | Must the provisions of Article 15(3) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, whereby the Romanian Government was required to inform the Secretary General of the Council of Europe of its intention to adopt measures to reduce remuneration and to specify the time-limit laid down for implementing them, be interpreted as rendering invalid Law No 118/2010 and Law No 285/2010? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Must the provisions of Article 15(3) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, whereby the Romanian Government was required to inform the Secretary General of the Council of Europe of its intention to adopt measures to reduce remuneration and to specify the time-limit laid down for implementing them, be interpreted as rendering invalid Law No 118/2010 and Law No 285/2010?

---