alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>            
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            3,858     
<SECURITIES>                                      2,166     
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2,960     
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1,840     
<INVENTORY>                                           0     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  9,597     
<PP&E>                                            1,108     
<DEPRECIATION>                                      753     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   11,146     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7,045     
<BONDS>                                               0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0    
<PREFERRED>                                           0     
<COMMON>                                            107     
<OTHER-SE>                                        3,981     
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     11,146     
<SALES>                                          13,448     
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 13,448     
<CGS>                                             3,306     
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3,306     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 15,600     
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  375     
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (5,083)   
<INCOME-TAX>                                          1     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (5,084)   
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0    
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (5,084)   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (0.48)   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.48)   
                                                           
                                                           

</TABLE>
# C_2013108EN.01002401.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 February 2013 — Caventa v OHIM — Anson’s Herrenhaus (B BERG)

(Case T-631/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark B BERG - Earlier Community word mark Christian Berg - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 108/63

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Caventa AG (Rekingen, Switzerland) (represented initially by: J. Krenzel, then by T. Stein and A. Segler, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: K. Klüpfel and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Anson's Herrenhaus KG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: O Löffel and P. Lange, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 September 2011 (Case R 2014/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Anson’s Herrenhaus KG and Caventa AG.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Caventa AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Caventa AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.

1

---
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending September 13, 2008

|Filer                | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                                 
|-------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|EUROBANCSHARES, INC. | 4c8            | EuroBancshares, Inc., San Juan, Puerto Rico to engage through its subsidiary, EUBK Securities, Inc.(in formation), San Juan, Puerto Rico, in securities brokerage and riskless-principal transactions, pursuant to Section 225.28(b)(7)(i)and (ii) of Regulation Y.          | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:           | Not applicable
|Federal Register:    | Not available 
|ICICI BANK LIMITED   | FBSEA          | ICICI Bank Limited, Mumbai, India, to establish representative offices in San Francisco and Los Angeles, California; Atlanta, Georgia; Chicago, Illinois; Edison, New Jersey; Houston, Texas and Washington D.C., pursuant to Section 211.24(a)(2)(i)(B)(2) of Regulation K. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:           | Not available 
|Federal Register:    | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending August 16, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location            | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|--------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NORTH VALLEY BK, ZANESVILLE, OHIO | 783910 | 05/05/2008 | 08/05/2008     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-06123, 333-32329, 333-31410, 333-61560 and 333-73880 of Sipex Corporation on
Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-33152, 333-61562 and 333-87350 of
Sipex Corporation on Form S-3 of our report dated March 12, 2004, relating to
the consolidated financial statements of Sipex Corporation as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2003 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Sipex Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Jose, California
March 12, 2004
#### §§ 502.29-502.30 [Reserved]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1859

EVETTE E. HAGY, Widow of Jerry R. Hagy,

Petitioner,

v.

WELLMORE COAL COMPANY, c/o Wellmore Energy; SECURITY 

INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF 

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (19-0362 BLA)

Submitted: August 23, 2022 Decided: August 25, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, HEYTENS, Circuit Judge, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Evette E. Hagy, Petitioner Pro Se. James Mark Poerio, POERIO & WALTER, INC., 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Jeffrey Steven Goldberg, Gary K. Stearman, UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 20-1859 Doc: 22 Filed: 08/25/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Evette E. Hagy petitions for review of the Benefits Review Board’s (BRB) decision 

and order affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of black lung benefits 

pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-944. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised 

in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Hagy’s informal brief does not 

challenge the basis for the ALJ and BRB’s decisions, she has forfeited review of these 

orders. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is 

an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues

preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 20-1859 Doc: 22 Filed: 08/25/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
§ 307.3 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) *Administrator* means the Maritime Administrator of the Department of Transportation.
( b ) *MARAD* means the Maritime Administration, Department of Transportation.
( c ) *Coast Guard* means the United States Coast Guard, Department of Transportation.
( d ) *AMVER* means the Automated Mutual-Assistance Vessel Rescue System operated by the U.S. Coast Guard as it applies to U.S.-flag ships and certain non-U.S.-flag ships in U.S. foreign commerce under this regulation.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending October 14, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
|                                 |                             |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
| Date:  March      31, 2009 | /s/      Thomas B. Akin          |
|                                 | Thomas      B. Akin              |
|                                 | Principal      Executive Officer |
|                                 |                             |
| Date:  March      31, 2009 | /s/      Stephen J. Benedetti    |
|                                 | Stephen      J. Benedetti        |
|                                 | Principal      Financial Officer |
Summary of the 2005 Annual Incentive Program



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 2005 Annual Incentive Program Summary 
  
 Summary 
  
 Magellan’s 2005 annual incentive program has been established to motivate individual activities that will improve the overall performance of the company. Metrics
have been identified and targets set in several performance categories, including financial and operational categories. In addition, a funding metric has been established that sets a floor of performance for the partnership below which no payout for
any metric will be made. This mechanism reflects the view of management that it is inappropriate to pay bonuses if the overall cash generation of Magellan drops very significantly for any reason. 
  
 The 2005 program payout will be based on a combination of: 
  

	 	•	 	Partnership performance 

  

	 	•	 	Individual performance 

  
 Threshold, target and stretch levels of achievement have been set for each metric. Payouts under the plan begin after the threshold level of performance is achieved. Target payout occurs when results reach targeted
performance expectations and the maximum payout occurs if results reach the stretch targets. 
  
 Payouts at the target performance level are based on a percentage of employee eligible earnings. Eligible earnings include regular base pay and eligible overtime pay for the period in which an employee is a
participant in the plan, including, but not limited to, hours worked during a normal workday, PTO, short term disability, holiday pay, jury duty pay, bereavement pay and shift differentials.  
  
 If target performance is achieved, 100% of the calculated payout is eligible to be paid under
the program. If stretch performance is achieved, 200% of the calculated payout is eligible to be paid. The calculated payout percentage for performance between threshold and target, or between target and stretch, will be prorated. 
  
 Fifty percent (50%) of the calculated payout is subject to a personal performance adjustment.
The personal performance adjustment applied to that 50% of the calculated payment can range from 0% of that 50% to 200% of that 50%. 
  
 Eligible employees begin participating in the plan on the first day of employment in the plan year. To be eligible to receive an award, an employee must be employed
during the plan year including the last day of the plan year and through the time the award is actually paid. Exceptions to this requirement will be made where a participant’s employment is terminated as a result of retirement or death, or the
participant becomes eligible for long-term disability after the first day of the plan year but before the award is paid. Such employees will be eligible for a prorated award based on the portion of the year worked prior to the employment termination
event. A participant whose employment is terminated anytime prior to the distribution of the award under any other circumstances is not eligible for an award.
EXHIBIT 99.15
 CONSENT OF EXPERT
   (a)
    
    under the headings The Nuclear Business  Reserves and Resources, The Nuclear
Business  Development Projects  Cigar Lake and Interest of Experts in the
Corporations Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2009 dated March
31, 2010 for the Cigar Lake property; and(b)
    
    under the heading Reserves and Resources in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation for the year ended December 31,
2009 dated February 23, 2010 for the Cigar Lake property,
    /s/ Grant J. H. GoddardName:
    
    Grant J. H. Goddard, P. Eng.Title:
    
    General Manager, Cigar Lake project, Cameco CorporationDate:
    
    March 31, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1999
<CASH>                                           9,452
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,813
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     94,053
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               215,470
<PP&E>                                          43,621
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 354,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          120,656
<BONDS>                                        178,512
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           46,496
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (49,360)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   354,690
<SALES>                                        303,518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               303,518
<CGS>                                          229,386
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  229,386
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,238
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,686)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (130)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,644)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### § 5.807 Commandant's Decision on Review.

The Commandant's Decisions on Review are available for reading purposes at Coast Guard Headquarters, at Offices of District Commanders, Sector Offices and Marine Inspection Offices. (See 33 CFR subpart 1.10.)

[CGD 82-002, 50 FR 32184, Aug. 9, 1985, as amended by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36330, July 2, 2007]
Aircraft

Weight (Including Battery And Propellers)

1280 g

Diagonal Size (Including Propellers)

590 mm

Max Ascent Speed

5 m/s

Max Descent Speed

3 m/s

Hover Accuracy

Vertical: +/- 0.1 m (when Vision Positioning is active) or +/- 0.5 m

Horizontal: +/- 1.5 m

Max Speed

16 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind)

Max Altitude Above Sea Level

6000 m

Operating Temperature

0°C to 40°C

GPS Mode

GPS/GLONASS

Camera

Sensor

Sony EXMOR 1/2.3” Effective pixels: 12.4 M (total pixels: 12.76 M)

Lens

FOV 94° 20 mm (35 mm format equivalent) f/2.8, focus at ∞

ISO Range

100-3200 (video) 100-1600 (photo)

Shutter Speed

8s -1/8000s

Image Max Size

4000 x 3000

Still Photography Modes

Single Shot

Burst Shooting: 3/5/7 shots

Auto Exposure Bracketing (AEB): 3/5

Bracketed Frames at 0.7EV Bias

Time-lapse

Video Recording Modes

Phantom 3 Professional

UHD: 4096x2160p 24/25, 3840x2160p 24/25/30

FHD: 1920x1080p 24/25/30/48/50/60

HD: 1280x720p 24/25/30/48/50/60

Phantom 3 Advanced

FHD: 1920x1080p 24/25/30/48/50/60

HD: 1280x720p 24/25/30/48/50/60

Supported SD Card Types

Micro SD

Max capacity: 64 GB. Class 10 or UHS-1 rating required

Max Bitrate Of Video Storage
Phantom 3 Professional

60 Mbps

Phantom 3 Advanced

40 Mbps

Supported File Formats

FAT32/exFAT

Photo: JPEG, DNG

Video: MP4, MOV (MPEG-4 AVC/H.264)

Operating Temperature

0°C to 40°C

Gimbal

Controllable Range

Pitch -90° to +30°

Stabilization

3-axis (pitch, roll, yaw)

Vision Positioning

Max Velocity

Less than 8 m/s (when 2 m above ground)

Altitude Range

30 cm-300 cm

Operating Range

30 cm-300 cm

Operating Environment

Surface with clear pattern and adequate lighting (Lux > 15)

Remote Controller

Operating Frequency

2.400 GHz-2.483 GHz

Max Distance

2000m (outdoors and unobstructed)

Video Output Port

USB

Operating Temperature

0°C- 40°C

Battery

6000 mAh LiPo 2S

Mobile Device Holder

For tablet or phone

Receiver Sensitivity (1%PER)

-101 dBm ±2 dBm

Transmitter Power (EIRP)

FCC: 20 dBm

CE: 16 dBm

Working Voltage

1.2 A @7.4 V

Battery Charger

Voltage

17.4 V

Rated Power

Phantom 3 Professional

100 W
Phantom 3 Advanced

57 W

Intelligent Flight Battery

Capacity

4480 mAh

Voltage

15.2 V

Battery Type

LiPo 4S

Energy

68 Wh

Net Weight

365 g

Max Flight Time

Approximately 23 minutes

Operating Temperature

-10°C to 40°C

Max Charging Power

100 W

App / Live View

Mobile App

DJI Pilot

EIRP

100mW

Live View Working Frequency

2.4GHz ISM

Live View Quality

720P @ 30fps (depending on conditions and mobile device)

Latency

220ms (depending on conditions and mobile device)

Required Operating Systems

iOS 8.0 or later

Android 4.1.2 or later

Recommended Devices

iOS: iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPad Air, iPad Air Wi-Fi + Cellular, iPad mini 2, iPad 

mini 3, and iPad mini 3 Wi-Fi + Cellular. This app is optimized for iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, and iP

Android: Samsung S5, Note 3, Sony Xperia Z3, Google Nexus 7 II, Google Nexus 9, Mi 3, N

*Support for additional Android devices available as testing and development continues