**PHYS ~C** **L OESC** **PT ON**  

### W O RK S H EE T

DRUM l 

### 2 3 4 5 

### 6 

### 7 8 9 10 11 

### 12 13 

### l4 

### 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

### --**-­** PIPPILB # __ 

### !I 

### SIZE COLOR/DESCRIPTIO K



# ' - · - nAn_ -

_

·

_ ·

_ ·-- · · · ·- ·- ·--- · 1 

# o

r COMTAII!DS __ 

### %FULL %SOL tLIQ



# .

VES011200·' 6.0 PROCESS OPERATION S PROC.troURES •. Eacb - moY4mll!llt or 

### a..w.aste . withinJ.he

_

f..,illty, during whi<:h 

### 8J1Y cbanga**inlls ~may**  .. occur, makes it subject to addltional**ina~lion,** ...mpling 

### and anal;yaeo to 

### determine app ropriate handlliJg 

### and management of the 

### waste. M8J1Y ofthe 

### 8118l..r- needed 

### for the lrU!Jmnt, 

### storage, and clispooal 

### 1\mcticnsare 

### performed during 

### incoming waste sblpment identifiCation. 

### These are not 

### repented unle M It is 

### known or b<.fu.rvA<I that the
- characteristics have 

### changed during st...-.p. 

### Existing Wld 

### 8Jiticlpated operations 

### at tho facili ty , 

### for which 

### cur rent and periodic 

### sampling and aua1y$es lo imporla:lt, 

### ioclude the 

### f o llowing: 

### Storage/Blending Decanting 

### lncinenstlon The anazytical procedures 

### for each of these are 

### described separat ely bel ow . 6.1 Storag e Bef<M"e 

### tiiX1 

### wasta are placed into a storage w . lit, Facility**~ent** wiiiDSSe$$ the 

### eompatibility o f the waate 

### with t be storage unit 

### materials of 

### eonstruction and witb WMtee al:e8d;y 

### atored therein . 6.1.1 IVa.ote 

### in Containel'l! 

### Contalrurized wastes are etored 

### with respeet to ienitibility, reaetMty and compatibility. CompatibUlty shall 

### be 

### determined eollliatent 

### with DOT 

### HM-181 guidelines 

### es SUIIli1WiJed 

### in tho 

### 'Segreaatlm> Table for Hazardow! 

### Ma terlale' listed 

### in 49 CFR 177.848 (see Appendix W AP-G). Based on the 

### initial DOT 1=<1 c1a.>o determination 

### and analysis of 

### tbe 

# =-""'· the drummed waste will be 

### aegregated eceording to 

### compnt ibillty. These materials will be eepanted from incompatible materlale by 

### storage in I!Ogl'egated bays within the drum 84rage 

### blliJdine;s. This ls 

### ac:complished by 

### the dAta from the WPS, Mandatory Analyses, 

### 1111d S upplem entary AnaJ.yses 

### requested by the 

### Pacili\)r 

### Maoogement, Ccmpatlbili\)r segregation will 

### not apply to -terial 

### which**ba~** 

### been repackaged, generated, or sotidified at TWI . To further verity that wastes are**~** properly**cat~** TWI wi1 m.titute a Pl'OfiJ1IIll r:L 

### CcntaineJ+ud**to ~**  

### Compatibility Testing. Compatibility will 

### be IISSCIIaed 

### by 

### perforllling a liquid wBBte compatibility on tilo wastereceivedfor cmt.ainer storageaa outlined ill Appendix 

### WAP·A. Tbl! teotingprogram will n ot apply 

### to mWI 

### quanti ty packaged chemicals 

### or other 

### material e x empted under • U.4 end 

### 5.1.1. Tn tho 

### event that 

### a eompatibili\)r Ia performed 

### on maleriaiJ which 

### ere indicated "" 

### in<ompatible per 

### DOT , the 

### compatibility test will take 

### precedenoa over the DOT segregation syatem. 6.1.2 Waste In Thph 

### Liquid waates 

### delivered 

### in bulk 

### form ( e.g, tank trucko, 

### railroad lank 

### car->, or pwnped from 

### drUDJS, are typically 

### plared in 

### built**at~** 

### tanks prior to incineratiro. Prior to transferrlqr any 

### Wll8 ta intA> 

### a storege W

AP·29 BE VIS[ON 11 9/Z9194 I. ! 

# ! I 

### ' i 

## ' . 

## VES011 201tank, the 

### eompatrollity otthe WMte with 

### the material already 

### In the 

### tank and 

### the tank ID&Ierialo 

### or eooatnlctlon

·-

### '!!!'**be ~~**  

### b7**~l;i9'!_14 ~**  

### C:O!!'P"'ft>ii!IY tea (tee 

## Al>l>!'!dlx Vf.J;J._•A) . 

## H! .**-- l.!l!k** **~** 

## . competibility will be -.1 

### b7 

## per!onnlac a liquid 

### wute C<QPBtibilty 

### teet on the liquid ..,..**~** 

### for bulk 

### &tore8e wi.lh lll'\llllllng 

### compooite 

# or the tanka 

### within the 

### eontalnment 8yttam to 

### which the D- - will be&dded. 

### 6.1.3 Bulk So!idl SIO<W Built IIOtidl will be 

### lllllllall"d u Collowo 

### for un'oeclina into tbo bulk aolidl pits: 1 ) 

### Qnb' material whkb 

### pa-. the 

### paint mter 

### tat ean be 

### placed into 

### lho 111.cnge piU. 

### 2) The BTU and 

### chlorine contento UMd will 

### be 

### eithe r: (II) 

### Tbe 

## bieber value of tbe 

### currem pit 

### or the in'"""'nc Dl8ieri&l, or (b) 

### The IDiderial 

### will be oampled aft.er 

## miz!na and the aample will be IUllli)'Hd for 

### BTU and 

### cbk>rine. 

## u Decanliq 

### In 

### lh• decant.!Ds pt<Xlea. liquid 

### wutea**are~** 

### Crom druma 

### or other omall 

### conllliDin into ....,... bulk .,.,... UDU. 

### The 

### oppl!reNe Moudatory**~will** be performed 

### cm- to 

### be 

# ...._.eel Prior**to~** a I.Aquld 

### Wille Compol!bllity Tea andopecillc lll""ri9tetltOG a 

### volume 

## •• " at'ed aompk will be performed 

### to fllllllrl that 

### -..o to be bulked topt.ber .,.. 

### compat.lble. A 

## "*- 11 

## •'allied IUIIple ia 

### a volume**proportioo~Me ~or**  

### the 

### intaldecl declm liquldL 

## u lDcb!-uotl 

### In the 

### incinoralloo p!'C)OM8, liquid. 

### oemHolid and 

### ootid - -**~** 

### b7 hilb**~**

### ...... thMmal 

### ondat!M. The 

### ....Wt.luc
- Include cOIIlbulllioo ,...,. that are 

### ec:rubbed to remove 

### I:ta and pottioulatH.IIDII other tNMment reoidutol 

### O.e., aeb, -.and ocrubber, ol.... , ecrullber oalida**("-~...,._dual)** that are fUrther IDAIIAipd. 

### The t1'eolt"*lt**•"•olinl'~** prccram 

### for indnerallaG fU1 be 

### dMded into 

### two "'i" _.., eecb with 

### a apooc:i& 

### purpow. o 

## Pmm'rnri 

# · n·'zaeo COGfirm that the wMie 

# r.u. wllllin the 

### facllic, pennlt _,_**operat~nc** COIIIInlinta -' o11ow IIDe 

### limine 

## or the**~** operUiciGol**cocou.~GU;** 

### o 

## Trrtmmt &rfdue En/uetlme 

### conflnl1 mcoe.IW 

### -lment ud thai 

### the ebarw:t.eriltia ot 

### the**~** 

### ellluct 

### ora IUCh tbM 

### it caD be oant 

### to 

### the 

### nat 1tep**(~** diopooal, ar 

### further lreat!Dmlt) l:uod 

### upon permit 

### or**~ ~**  

### Reaidl.. 

### Crom on·olte**~** ollancl 

### ctUopo.l 

### reetricted- will be 

# ..,..,.eel md/o. eYIIIualed,- neecled, apiDit

### the~ treetmmt ll&odlrdol 01' probillltlona.

### AD~ reoidueoo .. - - 

## orr lite 

### fer otorap, 

### further 

### ll'ealment, and/or di8pooal will ..... 

### appropriate 

### DOtillcation formo**(in~** wlih 

### 40 CFR Part 268) . The applicatiOil ol tbete 

### oegm.ento io diaeuMed 

### below . 

### WAP-30 BEVIBION 11**9129~** 

### c '·



# '**~.** 

## V ESOJ 1202, 'I 

### 'lbe lljlplication oftheee oegmentll Ia diacussed 

### below, 6.3.1 

### Ptt=l.!!!!l;motnt Analy!e! 

### All wutea fed 

### to tbe 

### incineral<ll' are blooclod to meet permit 

### oonstreints and to maintain steady state 

### (normal) operation of tbe 

### incinerator. Liquid 

### waalc is 

### blended ln bulk tanko 

### prior to lncineraUon. PreUoeatment Ana!yaet 

### (6 .8.1 numben 1·6) are optional 

### for liquid wute 

### ln 

### lanb whieb 

### will undereo fUrther 

### blellclina priM 

### to i:lcineration. Prior to lnclnera.tlan, 

### a 1111111ple is dra""' from the tank 

### to be fed and maly%ed 

### for the foUowin{: parameten: 

### 1. Heat \lalue · Heat value is 

### meaaured to cont rol tbe feed rat., of 

### waste fed Into tbe Incinerators . Tbe 

### muimum beet value wbicll 

### can be 

### burned per hour is 

### estabtiohed In tbe operaline permit.

3.

4. 

### Alb Content • 

### Alb oontent is 

### meuu.red to control pemml aah of 

### Wliste fed 

### Into , tbe eeconclary c:bamber 

### waate burners oftbe illclneratoro. Tbe 

### IIIIJiiJDum asb 

### content for 

### waste fed 

### into tbe oeccndary c:bamber II ostablilbed 

### ln the optn.ting ptrmlt. 

### Wh.,.. tbe permit llae 

### not eetab&hed 

### a limit, tbia 

### anaiYsla 1rill not be perfOnned. Total 

## <Worlne Content · Cblorlne content ia 

### mee.aured to oontrd 

### tbe pereent 

### cl>lorme In wute fed into the 

### loclneratora. 'llle maximum chlorine 

### content for waote fed Into 

### tbe lndnerator ia 

### eetabllehed In 

### tbe 

### operatlne permit. Fluorine Cmte!Jt is 

### meMtD'Od and wred.ln ecqjwlctlon with 

### ehlcrir.e and bromine 

### content to determine tbe baloeen eontenl In 

### wute feeda to tile secondary chamber waste 

### bumero of 

### tbe loclneratoro. 'llle IIIIJiiJDum 

### halogen content 

### for waste fed 

### into the secondary 

### chamber ia**"""bll~** in the oper$ling permh. 

### 6. Brgmjne 

### Content is 

### meaaured and used. in 

## 00111unodon witb chlori'\e and 

### fluMiDe content to determine the 

### baloll'!n content 

### In waote 

### feeda 

### to the eeconclary chamber 

### waate burners of 

### tbe lncineraton. 

### The IIIIJiiJDum 

## beJocen content 

### fM waste fed into tbe leCODdary 

### ebamber ia eetabliabed 

### in tbe operating permit . 

### 6. oH 

## Screen is uaed 

### to**~~** 

### tbe intepity oftank farm materials of 

### eOOII.t'UI:tion and provide**~~** data 

### fM proper 

### blencllnr. 7. 

### Soecjl!t Grayitr • 

### 'lllis 

### informMJon is used 

### to auure 

### tbet tbe 

### lpOCifle 

### graority of 

### bulk or 

### clecen1 compoeite liquid ia 

### ll!lll tban 

### tbe delign epedfic graority 

### for 

### tbe 

### sfAlra&e lanb (&g . = 1.6). 

### 'llle permit operating 

### Y1lluea were 

### eatabliabed lbrcugh

### a trial burn. 

### 'lbe permit operatin& 

## ...we. may 

### be ebanged if 

### it is demonalrated 

## throueh a trial 

### bum tbat 

### the new permit 

### guidelinee allow tbe indJlerator to operate witbln the 

### pennit coootralnt 

### Md at a ateocly 

### state (llormaJ) 

### operation. 

### WAP-31 IUMSION 11 9n9/94 

# I; !**L~** 

### 1.· I. 

# --i-

'

I'

i . 

# ! i 

### ' !



## '.



# 1.**,~** 

### VES 011203The Fac:illty Management 

### will review the blend 

### aoalYaes to UBure permit !lOIIIpllanee 

### aod to 

# -w-e that 

### the blend wil allow 

### eteady stale <i>ol'llllll) opentiAxl of the incinerator. 

### The 

### blend wiD be**~lilted** 

## . - · ·-·-···· ·-- 

# . --·· ....... 

## ----- . .. .. . - 

# ..---···-'"" •· 

# ...**-~·--··** 

## . .. -·- ·-· -· · ···· -- · -· · 

## . ·- 

# --- 

# ---- whenever 

### oeeeswy to meetell permit spec:ilitat.ion 

### Thia is acoocnpliahe<i 

### thrOIJ!lh tank-to-tank bleodini with 

### addit:looal 

### wasta. A Llquld Waate 

### Compatibility Test will be 

### performed prior to ell 

### r.enlt·to-tank transfere of tiquld waste . Thia new blend is 

### then «!eted for the blend parameten, which are used to determine optimum bleud cbaracteri!tics 

### as ment.ioned In the prevlo\11 paragraph. 

### Contaillerized waste ;. 

### ""'l""""•d for incineration 

## IJlrcuih careful indexiqJ olCOI>UDMr feed. The 

### parameten neceuary 

### for selection olproper feed 

### oe<JUl'DCe (Heet Value, Chlorine 

### Content) are evaluated billed 

### on the Mandatol")l Analy...._ 

### Fc.r the 

### materiala 

### Identified In 

### Section 6 . 1.1, the**~** 

### oC the above 

### param.Ws are**ea~ed** 

### bued on pbyUal and chemieal compooition 

### information obtained 

### per 

### Section 4.1 and 5.1. Contslner feed**~<quenooa** relleet an on;olng evaluation 

### of operaliJli ezperionce.

6.S . 2 Treatment l!e!idue Evaluation Poet-treatment &Dalyaee aud evaluation will caafirm 

### ..-fWtreatmentllld that the cbaraetsriltics of 

### the procees ell!uent are auch 

### thai it can be aent to 

### the next step (dlacbarp. dispoea1 or further tree.tment) be.oed 

### on permit 

### or proc:ftl 

### c:onatralnt.e. In IIOOOrdanco 

### with oiO CI'R 

### 268. 7(b), residues 

### (or**waste~)** ruull.ing from oo-site tt8tment 

### oC land dlapoaal 

### restricted- are aoalyud and/or evaluated, u needed, 

## acaWt the appropriate treetment atandard (e.g., Cooatltuent**Co~tralion** In W..te 

### Extnot (CCWE) valueo) or prohi bition. Tbe**Incineration~** rewlts In the**~n** of 

### the followit1i reoidaes: ash, alllg and aerubber 

### system 

### eollda. Eech reeidue hae 

### been thoroughly 

### evaluated to 

### develop a 881llpllng &equency that Ia COillioteni and independen' ol the**o~** wuteo o<cepted for in<lneratloo. Wutea 

### c.r**~~** 

### reolcNee IODt o!f«te 

## c.,. f"uribar tr.. tm.,.,t will be """'mpaniod by the appropriate notjfj(ation (or certi£1cAtion) fOI"IIll. Incin<rator 

### aoh 

### and 

### alae**~nerated** In the rotary 

### kiln aud dl")l 

### ocrubber aolldo 

## senerased in lncinerat>oa UDita 

### numbers 2, 8 ot 4 

### are oempled, 

### amalyzed aud 

### evaluat4!d on a 

## nsuiar buis 

### (Bee Appendix WAP·B, Section 2.2.1) In aa:ordance 

### with analytleal procedurell required to analy&e aplnot the 

### appropriate treatment ltan<lard or prabibilion (See Appeadl& WAP·B) . lDdnarator 

### ub gonerated ln 

### the filed hearth illrineration unila is either 881llpled. 

### amalyzed aud eveluated oo a load·by-load buia or i8 reu-eated aud l\llleeqlwltly ...aluated. 

### The 

### F..:illty Management will 

### review tbe analytical 

### resu1to and 

### determine the diapoeition of the 

### treatment roaidua. IC the analytical reoulto 

### meet the appropriate tree.tment atenclard 

### ( e.g., OCWE value ), the 

### treatment resi:lue is 

### then approved for llhipmeDt. Each shipment is eo::eompe.nled 

### with the 

### following documentation: 

### Waste Manifeot; Land Dispoeal 

### Beatriction Treetment CerUI"JCation; Analytical Report or reference to oueb anaJytieaJ delA.
WAP·S2 

### REVISION 11**0120~** 

### ' 

# ! I i



## VESOI1204

### In the event that the analysis 

### does 

### not meet the appropriate treatment standard (i.e., CCWE valuee), the 

### Fadlity Manapment will inveatlpte 

### the samplin;r**~·** 

### and the analytkal 

### procedure to 

### enaure uo •.. -- ·· ·•··**-~·· ·** **-~** ,__.. ...**·--- ··** **~.,** ·· ··¥· .. . . .. ......___ , ····-· ow- · -· ........ -· ··· -··- - - - -- 

### coolaminatlon. 

### TY.o additiooal lllolllpiM will 

### bo Sllbmitted 

### for ano\y a ;. oC the porometort 

### which**~ed** treatment •tandarda in the fir•t roomd or analyals. Ifthe seeond analy&ea 

### pe.as. the resldue will be approved 

### for dieposaL If the 80ilrCe of 

### the eontam ! notion can be determined, it will be 

### documented. However, if the 

### aeoond analyses dc:<!8 not meet the appropriate treatment 

### standard ( I.e

. , CCWE vllluee), TWl will 

### retrea t the residuea in order to meet 

### the appropriate 

### treatment ew>dard 

### ( Le., CCWE .alaeo ).**t.!tcmati~ ,**  'lWI fMY**fore~o** additional**~ampllnll** 

### and anolyN and 

### choose to 

### retreat the 

### residue w blcb <ld not Initially 

### meet the 

### treatment standard.



### WAP·SS REVISION 11 9/29/94 

### i I 

### I 

# I 

# i 

# l

VES0 11 205

# .. \

, I**~** 

### '7.0 QUAIJTY CONTROL POUCY



## .. -**'l"iYY dev~** **~ p~**  p( gl!ftiity**!;<l!ltrol llf.11Ctic;~**  

### 1!1\!1**~** 11!--l!**the.~** preQ$911-

- and liCCUllii:Y are llllllntained 

### t.bJ'ou&:hout all of ita laboratories. All site la.bomories are requiTed 

### mparticipate In**~hil** pr0£1"8111. 

### Contract laboratoriea employed by the company are subject m inapection and audit while**peri"~** analylil for 

### CWM. A review oC the contract laboratory Is conducted m ensure**~** the quality eontral oC 

### CWM dl.la 

### 13 m&lntained. Tbe quaity 

### contrcl proeram illwed 

### on 'HAndbook 

### for 

### ADabtice1 QuaJ«y Control in 

### ware. and Wastewater Laboratorieo" EPA, Marth 1979. 

### Good laboratory practices wblc:h 

### eDCOOlpasasampling. sample bandllng. housekeeping and aafety are maintaine d 

### at all leboratoriee.**~** 

### following preocticea muat be implemenl..s 

### at all aita lebor&.toriec All inatrumentatlon muat be evaluated 

### lhroush the use of an iniiii"UlD<!Ilt check etandard. Divergence from**~** bencllmark oritari& requires CCI'!'8CtioL Tbe ioonlment check standard resulta are recorded. 

### The record lilii)' abo cont&n evaluation parameters, beocbmark criteria and 

### meinteMllee 

### r«<rda. 

## llee&'enl blanka are typicelly prepared with each batch oC 

### lllmlplet and analysed to e1111Ut8 

### eample contamination baa 

### not OC>:IIITed. 

### Irblanlt 

### anaiYaee do 

### not fall within ..:eplable limlta, modification ol reaeenla Qt modilical.ioo ollhe 

## anaiYf.ical metbod Ia implemeol.ecL A sample 

### is**~ed** 

### in duplice.te typically for each twenty samplee 

### beinl ana!T<ed for a particular penmetet' . A blind duplleata sample 

### will be 

### IUbmiticd to tbe laboratoey oo a 

### monthly basla. 

### Betu1ta of theae dupllc.ate analyeeo will be reviewed for conaiatency. A quality control solution or 

### sample material wiD be anal7zed 

### at leeA once for 

### each 

## &17 or -" hatch run to ehow**~** calibral.ion and rtandudization of lnotnunentatioo 

### is wltbin aeeeptable limito. Tbia procedure 

### infomuo the 1abcwatory that p rescribed 

### prec:isiaD and accuracy are being**mein~** 

### Beeulla of thele anal,yaee are reported for review . Fortifications are employed to monitor recoven.... and mdntain 

### utractb1 Uld/or 

### eoooentre&o technique8 

### at aoooptaNe IevelL Thil procedure 

### prom.. infCit'llllllloll about the effect 

### of the sam ple matrix on the Ollalyte 

### in queotioo . Typirall,y, a ratlo of ooe fortificatioo for Ollcb twestty 

### aornplee analysed will be maintained U&uall,y, the MJDe aample uaed for the duplicate analyola 

### will be fortllled.

WAP -84 REVIBION 11 9/2!W4 

# l 

# !. '. 

# .. '. ! :



# : i i I 

### :. 

### .. 

## VES011206**~** 

## . ···· · ·· ··

When**availabl~,** refere110e materials from the Ne.tiooal InstiiUte of Staodarda and 'l'eebnol"i)', 

### or reference materialo from any 

### other**~** 

### aource, will be 

### obtAined ADd



## - - --- 

# - ·-- 

## -- -·- 

# - -··**~-** 

## - 

# - - . - 

# - 

# -- .. · - · -·· 

# - .. . ....zy..ed ...:rwdlng to 

### normal laboratory methodology to indi<ate 6CCUZ'IC1 cllbe 

### metboda. Tbue materia.lo will be analy•ed 

### e.t least quarterly if t.bc pare.m <ter has been performed dwi.ng that 

### quarter. l!eferenee matoriala 

### e.re not required 

### for oereenlng 

### metboda. All CWM labor atories putlclpate 

### in 

### 'round robin' sample analyRI. 

### Tbeoe samples will be submitted by 

### the 

### QAIQC Group ADd will be for the 

### analrsl8 of normal pare.metere. RetouliAI must be reported to the 

### group.**~from** lbe norma 

### establiabed by tbe**~ority** of 

### labore.tories partlcipe.tlng will be investige ted and correct ed. 

### Al.leaat one sam ple per month is 

## eem to a 

### CWM desi&1'••ed laboral<>ry or a clelijplated and appc-oved 

### eonlral:t laboratory 

### for ptll"allel 

### anolyeea. Thew 

### split aamplee 

### or a report of 

### both results e.re eent to the Quality Control Unit 

### when an out.alde laboralxlry 

### Ia employed. Samples sent 

### to the designated labore.tory will be losged 

### In and**~ed** withou t**·** 

### knowledge or i!lte 

### lab resull.l.



### - The fllc:ility reporto the f"oDowing 

### Information on a monthly buia: o Number or aample6**~ed** o Numbe r ADd reeull.l or duplice.tee o Numbe> and re..Ju of fortlllcationo 

### o Inatrwnent used o Frequency 

### of occ:urrence 

### for quality 

### oontrol cheek 

### eomple within 

### aoceptable limit• o Mean and otandard deviation of analyte In 

### queetion . The 

### facilil7 al8o reporta intra-lab 

### and round 

### robin reeulta 

### ao they 

### oecur and 

# ...c- material analyoio 

### e.t 1eaot 

### quarterb". A wri!tan 

### oopy or any third. party**contra~:t** 

### laborata-:Y'• quality 

### c:ootrol proetdureo is IUbmitted to CWM p rior 

### to approval A quality aoouranee impeetlon 

### Ia conducled 

### to enaure that proper r ecorda and**document<~** 

### - 

### .,._m and 

### ID8intalned. AD laboratorieo 

### e.re oul!jed. to 

### iMpeetion and &lldit of 

### all proeoduree while under 

### contract to 

### CWM. A review of the contract 

### labontory 

### Ia conducted to eoaure that the 

### quality oontrol is being maintained.



### WAP · 35 REVISION 11**~/04** 

## 1- 

# i 

# " ;·_: I 

# J



# I 

# I ; ! 

# I I 

# !

; 

# !

# I-**~** V ES 011207

### APP ENDIX WAP·A ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES [: !



### :.



# l· I I 

# I· j 

# I 

# I I

! 

### '. 

# i I; VE SO I1 208APPENDIX WAP ·A**~L~~ P~OC** **~[)tJ!m. S**  

### .. - ..... The**oUow!Dg~proeedureu e**  designed to 

### Identify or 80reeii waste . 

### I'bey are uoed by 

### CWM, hued 

### upon it.l operating experience, as rapid 

### but effective metllll for estebllshing key decilion 

### paramete110 portinent to 

### proper waate management. The aoaiyHtl deeaibed in the eeetiOM below 

### are bued 

### oo A8TM and 

### "Standard MethodJ" app10Ved by EPA or are bued an procedures and protoeol 

### formulated by CWM an<l """'l 

### CWM performance atandatds. Analytical 

### procedures not IJ.IIed below 

### may be 

### added as nec:eeaary with 

### prior !EPA approYal. 

### It should be noted that 

### the infcrmation**~** 

### in Ibis appendix is ll'!oeric Incbarecter . Tberefore, 

### oertain 

### test metho:!oo are cli.ecuued whlcll may pertain to 

### lnalment or dlapooal 

### proc:eaaoa thAI 

### are exduded from 

### the facility for which 

### the foregoing waste 8llllzy,.ia plan 

### Ia pre.oented. 

### I. UNIQUE ANALY'nCAL PROCEDUBES The 

### foUowm1r**~** procedures have been found by 

### CWW: to provide important quaotitative information pertinent 

### to eertain pr : : '1 

### ea. In 

### oome-, thoee**teat~** have 

### been deYeloped by 

### CWM to 

### provide lnforo>allon 

### not an.llahle &oca 'Standard Methods' In 

### Section 

## n wblcb follows. 

### In ather CMeSo the.oe 

### teets ""' aubatituted for 'Standard Methode' wh..., they 

### provide trufllcient 

### equivalent 

### Information. B!gclt-Rrtle 

## Tr.oetmem. Eyaluatlan • Samplee oC 

### wastee are combined 

### with aamplea cf 

### otber waatea or**~to** at. predelermlncd ratloa. Further te.tiDir IIIIIY 

### be required 

### in order 

### to coofinn that the**d~** 

### reaction baa oc:eurred. Cb!or wlumozy Herbpdea by Hlsh 

### Perfonponce Li!!!!ld C!uymatogmpby <HPLQ)·Tbia method 

### (CWM 92·78) ie 

### for the 

### analylia o£2,4-dichloropbenox;yacetic lcicl 

### (2,4-D), 2,4,6-trichloropbeooq....&.md (2,(,6-T), and 

### 2,4,6-**tricblorcpb.e~** 

### acid (Silves) 

### in**~** and 

### aolida uai:ol[ 

### HPLCJUV . The oblorophenOlQ' 

### aclda 

### and eetera are hydrolyted 

### to their 

### reepeet!ve lllllto by 

### heatinl[ and 

### ot.ining the IWilple with 

### aqueouo alka1L 

### The salto are then c:onverted to their 

### reopect.ive acido by 

### the 

### addition or 

### HCI.. The aqueous oolutiOM of the 

### free addo 

### are lhon anal)tted 

### lllil!g 

### HPLC 

## 111inJ ultravidet detection. Dlaoo!ye<! Su!fidea • An aliquot of 

### waste lo mb:ed with 

### di.otilled Wiler. The oolutioJIIIIUJ1'1 is 

### filtered 

### lhraucb filter papeT and 

### the reoultant filtrele 

### Is then aoaJ;ysed for oulfide. 

### Saturated lllltimorly P"'",;"m 

### tartrate and 

### 1:1 hydrac:hloric add 

### are added and the 

### oolor produced 

### io viluelly 

### compared with standardo.



### REVISION 11 9/29/D<l · .. · 

# I [ 

# I 

# I: . l I' 

# ' 

# ! i l 

# i ! .

' ·.·. 

# i i 

# ' j.



## VESOll 209

## Beat Value by 

### Near 

### Infrared Rel!ectancq !NIR) Speetroaeopy • Heat**of~** ia d..wmined by Near

### ~~-~Pt. in a

### re{l:!'*?:""**~? 1>?'** **pladnr ~** **~~~~In~ ~**  cell. The lnatrumeot produces NIR abtotbanee spectrum 

### which are converted to a heat of 

### eombuation valu e using a pteYioully def!Ded calibralioll curve. The method 

### firat IIC:J"Hill for llaDipiH to emw:t quollitati..-e opectroocopic feature• from the NIR speetra IUld then produces quantitative data for heat of

### r.ombuation 

### usinc multivariate callbrat.iona. Metals Screen by :'< · Ray 

### Flu!1F!J!!S!:!Jst 

## OCRJ>l· WilSie oamplea may be prepared. If n.,._,. , by grinding to a opeeified meoh 

### .U.. The prepared .ample ia placed in a oample holder 11nd posll.loaed f or reading. Iruotrument output identillea tbe pr-..ce of ,...,era) 

### met.ala for**ee~** purpoeeo. 

### Semi-quantifieation of aelected metalo ia then possible ... 

### lam · e to matrlz matcbed atandardt. MieroWJ!ve Aided 

### D!gert!on • A portion ofaemple 

### Ia 

## welabed into an appropriate 

### mlcro ... ve digelltlon veeeel and 

## dJae-ted uainlr a mixture of nitric and h,ydrocblorie acidlo . The**~** io t-t.cl in a .mcrowave ... en llllinjr progr&IDIDed ttepa to mlnimi ... the poabilily of venting. After coollng, 

### t.be 

### cooteata are dilut.ed to volume,



## . . IUte.-ed and**~by** the appropriate method. Orgnjco Screen bv Imm!!!l!!OP'Y · A portion of the wute somple io prepared for lmm\lllOIIOIIM3 acreening (S W-84 6 401 0) by using appoopdate aeparation procedureo (e.g., extraction, 6ltraUon, and/or 

### thin**~** chrOIIIAtoeraphy ). The extract ia then mixed and incubated in a**~** pr<><:e. inble antihody<cated tub6. The mecbanica of mixing,**incu~** and 

### III008IIriDi lakes about SO miouteo and 

### .-.Ita in a co lor change in o-.h tube .**Th~** color development ia bweroely proportioolll to the concentration of the**~~ntibod;y-epeciflc ~e(a)oflnlereort,**  

### e .g ., herhicides, pent.odiJoropbe (.PCP) , 

# .-w ...**~** lzydroc:arbooa <PARI), 

### o r total 

### petroleum h,ydrocarhona 

### (TPHa). 

### PCB Screen by lmmqnn!!m • A portion 

### of the waate eample ie prepared for**~** ecreenlng (CWM 93-81 and 94-82) by pori'ormlng an ex1ractioo 

### with metbanol followed by tlltradon. The oemple eztract il then mixed 

### and 

### IDcube.ted in a 

### etep-wille 

### proceea inaide the aniJbo<ly·ca.ted tuba. The 

### mecbanica 

### of 

### llliltinc. inc:abating and**~** 

### tekee about 

### SO minute& and**~Ia** 

### in 

### a color 

## cb&llfl" in eech tube. 

### Tbe color development 

### Ia**in~** proportional to the concentration of 

### PCBe and is detec:tad by a photometer. Percent Mdity • 

### Reeulta are re ported aa percent of 

### CaCO, equivalent or the particular spedfle apeciee if known. Percent Allr•Hzjtv • Reoults are reported 88 a 

### pe=nt of

### the specific 

### &lkalloe**specie~** (e.r .• CaOH, NaOH. etc. ) . 

### WAP-A·2 REVJSIQN 11**912019 ~**  

# Il

## VESOll2 10Qn!s!s 

### r....,..h Eztnd!qq 

### l'rocedure • A dellieJ>ated amount of 

### eample io 

### mixed with 

### the appropriate extraction 

## JJ.!!id**an<!-...!~ rcx.-** **ad~ ~~** **. ~.r..J!It~~** **~~ pH**  

## a!W!'f.**~COI_lta!U ~** **~~** 

### usinr the 

### appropriate appi'O\'ed methods. WgnrtMty 

### §gem · A aample of- 

### material is pasaed 

### 1'7 a 

### eeiaer counter or 

### autTey meter. RadioeciMty levolo Above haclqvound are noted, reoor<1ed and inveotigated.

Tpnk 

### Farm Caml!ltillili.ty • 

### A--.1 by 

### performi.ag a Liquid 

### Wasta Compatibility 

### Teat on the 

### liquid waote received Cor bulk 

## otoraee with a 

### compoeite sample 

## or the tanka witbin !.be containment eyotem to 

### wbicb !.be

- will 

### he added. Containment uea 

### master COIIIjiOOiite will be made up ooce per Wftk. 

### The 

### """"'f"C material will be checlted qa!nat thla master composite . 

### Y11!S!f!!!ty • The 

### viocooity of tbe 

### material ill viauaiJy 

### eoaluat.ed 

### ueine water 

### u a reference for low vilcollty. 

### Viocoeity ia 

### reported as low, medium, blgh or non·flowable, 

### ete. ; ) Con!alneri•e<l St.orye Compatjbl!ity • 

### Will be 

### -ed by 

### performine 

### a Uquld 

### Woate Campel.ibillty 

### Teet on tb• Wllllte 

### received for C<>Cltoiner olaage 

### as follon:

L 

### Tbe teet 

### program appllea only 

### to D!AterW that faila 

### the point 

### llltor teet. 

### b. A master compooite for ....:h ol tbe 

### DOT buard elMo 

## catep;... will be 

### ....mtaloed 

### at tbe aiie. c. Tho
- .... .ompooit.o 

### will be made up init.ially by 

### adding 100 

### mU. ol each receiver 

### ill the c.&leeorY to an appropriately sized container. 

### d Wbea tbe Deed fCI' competib!Hty 

### veriflcal.ioo 11M been determined, 

### a compet.lbility teet will be 

### performed with tbe 

### appropriate 

### DOT hamrd <leu 

### cateeCI'J. 

### e. 

### Tbe eompalibilily teet will be 

### performed M 

### fallon: 1 . 

### .In ord8r 

### to OMIII'e that tbe maet.er 

### compoa!te repr-Dtlthe 

### actual plant.wide inYelltocy 

## bi**~** 

### catepy, the 

### llllllllter compoeite will be IDIIintainod in**an~ sized~-**  2. 

### A 100 mU aampJe of the incoming**~-** will be 

### cbeclted with 

### a 100 

### mil sample of the 

### IIJ'PI:OPflate DOT hezard claN 

### master**cot~~poalte** uliDg tbe 

### 1iquid 

### compatibility 

### teat. 8 . IC the**~** paMea the compet.lbllity teat, tbe entire 

### 200 wil 

### oUture II added to the master 

### compoolto . 

### Tbe receiver is 

### then 

### approved to be otored 

### within aoy of the 

### eQiine**~** 

## ..,Wnine drums of that 

### DOT buard due category . 

### -' · If tbe ree<!iver 

### fails the compatibility teot, the l&lllpie will 

### not be 

### added to the maoter 

### com polite. 

### 6. The 

### receiver 

### will be 

### re-tested againlt 

### oae of the**remaini~Ji** 

### DOT hazard clua 

### categorlea. 

### WAP·A·S 

### REVIBJON 11 9m/IU 

## .. ,_ ; 

## i 

# 1: 

# .. l



### i I 

# I. i'

VES0112 1 1

### lfthe receiver iJ 

### not compatible with any 

## exi8tine DOT hau.rd clue ma.oter eompoeite, tbe**4!'Y!!!f JY!Il.Jle~tlijg.** **4~PrYO I!Il.ti!** **~.J.I!!It ~CIIIlP.e** **~** dit!!!:!ly tp a .. proceta 

### area for tnaUD. ent.. The testing pi'O£l'am 

### will not apply 

### to IIID8II quantity pedua&led cbemiadi, malerial**~hal** bu been**~** 

### or .olklifio<l , 

### or cl.b.er mal<!rial exempted under 

### 4.1.4 and 

### 5.1.1. In tho**even~** 

### that a compatibility i.e 

### performed on materials wlW:h 

### are indicated .., 

### Incompatible per 

### DOT hazard claao, the**com~"hility** ten will 

### take precedenoe over tbe 

### DOT hazard cl8u 

### IIJSiem. 

# n. STANDARD ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
Sample Work Up Teclmlqu.s:

Inorpnie Tecbllqu.eo Acid**~** prooedure far 

### flame atcmic: 

### abaorpti.on specl:rC18eopy Acid 

### flieution procedure far furnace 

### abeorptlon opectroaoopy Acid (]'an ) Bomb dipetion Acid dlge4tloo of oilo, 

## sr-. or waxes 

### Dlaaoluilon procedure for oill, KJ"'&&I"O. orwu.. 

### Acid cipetion**or~** 

### Allr.aline dlge8Uon (for solids) 

### Organic Teehaiquea Separstory funnel liquid-liquid axtractioo Cont.muoua liquicf.liquid 

### eslnelioll Acld · baoe clean-up 

### eztractlon Saxblet extraclian 

### SooicatJon estraction 

### METKOD REFERENCE

1-8010 8-84.()7; 1-80 20 8-91-61; S.E686; E926; 6-Bulletm 4 7 45 1· 9030



### Alumlna Column C!Mn-up and 

### Separation of 

### Pel.roloum Wastes l'lunlliJ ColumD CIM&up 8-8(·22; 

### 1-3610 1-3520 1-S5SQ**-8~** 

### 1-3650 1-8611 8-8(-22; 1-8620 1-:1600 8·84·22; 

### 1-8660 

### Silica Gel Clean·up Sulfur Clean·up lnorpnie 

### Anabtloal Methods:



### lnductlvelf Olupled Pluma Atomi<: 

### Emlaeion Spectroeoopy (ICP) ' Antimony Atomic 

### abeorpti on, direct 

### aapi:alion method Atoaie 

### abeorptlon, I'Umilee method Anenic 

### Atomic abeorpUoo, 

### furoaoe method Alamic abeaptlon, .-.. h,ydride melbod 

### W

AP · A-4 1-8010 1·7040; 4-204 . 1 1·70 4 1; 4 ·204.2 8-84 · 10; 

### 1 ·7060; 4- 206.2 1·7061; 4-206.8 REVISION 11 9/29/94 

## VE SO I1 212

### Barium Atomic abaorptloa, direct aapilatlon metbocl Atomic abeorption, funw:e method BerylliWD Atomic alleOrptlon,**dire<:~** ... piratlon method Atomic abeorptioa, furnace method Cadm!WD Atomic alleorption, direct. asph-atlon method Alcmle abeorption, fllnl*:e method Cakiwn Atomle abeorption, direct aspiration melbo<i 

### Alcmic abaorption, furnace**~** CbromiWD

Copper Alcmlc aho<lrption, direct upltation method Atomic: absorption, furnace method Hexavalent ehromium: Co-prec:ipit.alloo Huavalent chromium: Colorimetric 

### Huavalent cbromlum:**Chelation~** Atomic abeorptlon, direct aaplrat.icm method**Atomic~** funw:e method Alcmle aboorpl.ion, clirec:t eapiratlon method Atomic abeorption, Curn.oce method PhenanthroUne melbod (fenoua) Alcmic abtlorption, direct lllpiration melbod Atomk "'-rpt..oD. fllnl*:e method 

## Maaneaium Atomic abeorption, direct aspiration method 

### Manpnete Alcmic abaorpllon, direct aspiration Oll!tbod Atomt:**~** 

### turr.ce method Mercury (mMual oold--nopo r teebnique) InUQllidwaote In IOI:d or oemi·oolid WMte Nlcltel 

### Alcmic**~** direct aspilalioo mdbod Atomic abeorption, 

### tumece method Selenium Atomic abeorptinn, f'unlace method Atomic aboorptlon, gueeua hydride 

### 11101bod Atomic absorption, direct aspiration melbod 

### Al=lc abooorptioQ, fumace metbod

WAP-A-5 

### METHOD REFERENCE

1
- 7080; 4 ·208.1 1-7081; 4 ·208.2 1-7090; 4-210 .1 1-7091; 4-210.2 1-7150; 4·218.1 1-7131; 4 ·2 13.2 1·7140; 4·21S .1 4-216.2 1-7190; 4·218.1 1-7191; 4· 218.2 1·7195**1·7198;2~D** 1 · 7197; (.218.-j, 1-7210; ....**~.1** (.220.2 1-7880; 4·236.1 

### H36.2 

### 2-SilOOFeD 1-7420; 4·289 . 1 1-7.j,21; 4-239.2 1-7460; 4·W.1 1-7460; (.243 . 1 4·243.2 8-84-12; 1-7470 B-84·05 ; N&-12; 1·7471 1·7a20; 4·249 . 1 1-7521; 4·249.2 &-8(.13 ; 1 ·7140; 4·271).2 1·7741; 4·270.8 1·7760; 4-272.1 1-7761; 4·272.2



### REVlSION It 9129/94 

# I I

• 1 ..



### ' ! 

# i I 

# i·



# .

VES0ll213

# .. .. " 

# . . .. , 

## . .. ' 

## .....

PARAMETER )JEmOD REFERENCE

Tballium 

### Atomil abeorption, 

### direct upiralklo method 

### 1·7840; (·279.1 Atomic absorption, furnace method 

### 1·7841 ; 4·279.2 Atomic abaorptloo, direct a.ophatlon method 

### Atomic 

### abeorplion, furnace mdbod 

### Orpnlc Analytlcal 

### MeU>.oda:

Gaa Chromalo£raphic Methods**~ted** Volatile Orpnio:.s Noo-halogenated Volatile Orpnics Aroawlc Volal.ile Orpnlao Acrolein, hrylonitrile, Acetonitrile 

### Phenola Phthakte Eaten Orpnochlarine PeoUcidea aDd 

### PCBa Nltroornmatlal and 

### c,.dle 

### Kston.. Polyn•cleor Aromat.lc Hydrocarbooa Cblorinated 

### lf.ydroc:arbone Orpnophoophate Peeticlclee 

### CbloriDated 

### Herbiciclee GC&uut Gaa Chromatovaphi<:/Maaa Spectroe<>lPY Methods 

### GC1MS Method for 

### Dioxin GCiM8 Method for 

### V olatlle 

### <>rpmc. GCI1l8 Metbad for Sead-Volat.ile Orpnlca Infrared Spe<trOIOOJlY 

### Methods Screening 

### Mel.hoda:

Pbyalcel Delcriptloo**F'll!mmeNli~y** Potemw ScreeSl Wat.er Compatibility 

### pH Screen Sul6de Screen Cyanldoo 

### S<reen ()('mmineled Waate 

### CompaUbllity Pol:1meriWion Poi=lial Oxldiaer Screen 

### Paint Filter Teat 

### Bulk Demlq.. and Apparent Sped& GriiVity 

### Screen**WAP·A~** 1·7950; 4·289 . 1 4 · 289 . 2



### 1 · 8010 1·8016 

### l-8020 1·8090 1-8040 

### 1·8060 8-84-22; 1·8080 

### 1·8090 1·8100 

### 1-11120 1-BUO 1·8160 

### 8-8&02 ; S·E260 

### 1-11280,8290 1 -8240; 7-624 1·82SO; 8270; 7-626 

### 8·D2621, Dt063; 

### G· 

### 8· D4979 S.D4982 S.D6068C

3·D4980 8-D4978 S.D5049 8-D6068A S.D6058B

S·D4981

1·9095 3-06067

REVISION 11 9129104 

### VE S0112 14

### PARAMETER MlscellaneOWI Analytical Methods:

Acidity 

### Alkalinity Ammuula Anions by Jon 

### Chromatography Ash 

### Content 

### Bt<mides Cblorldet 

### Cooduclivitytcccduotance 

### Extraction Procedure Flasb point Penaky-Martena dOled-cup method Seta.flasb dosed-cup method 

### Cleveland open-cup Fluoride Free Cyenldes Halopn Contmt Heat Value Oil and Grease Oxidation-Red"JCtion (ll.edox ) Potential (ORP) 

### Petroleum Hydrooarbons, Total 

### R.!ccwerable Pbenob 

### pH Measurement 

### Pbolpbate• Radioactivity Scffi!n Solids Total ('1'8) 

### at 103-l060C**~ed** (TDS) at 1 eo •c 

### SUJpended, Total ('I'SS) 

### at 103-105"C 

### Fixed and 

### V ola tile at 

### 600 0C Spedflc Gra•'ity 

### Sulfatea Sulfur Total and Amenable Cyaoidea Total ChloriDe Content Total Orpnie Carbon Total SuJfide! 

### Toxicity Cbaracteristic Leaching 

### Procedure 

### (TCLPJ VIICOiity 

### Water Content



### WAP-A-1 

### m:THOD REFERENCE

8·9 1·68; 

### 2·2310 2·2320 4-360.3 &-87-40; 3-04327; 4·000 . 0



### 8-91·69; 8-0482, 03174 2-4500Bt'; 4-800.0, 320.1 

### I!-4600Cr: 

## 4-ooo . o, su .a 3-01126; 

### 4-1.20.1 1-1310 8-S..l9; 1-1010; 

### 8-093**1-1020;8-~8** 3-092 

### :V4llOOF'; 4-300 . 0, 340.2, 340.3 2-4600CN-a,J 

### 3-0808, 01!361, 

### 04327 8-87-37; 

### 3·0240, 02016

2 ·5620;**~13.1,** 418..2 3·01498 2-<6620F; .f.-418.1 

### 2 ·55 80, 6420; 4-420.1 Hl040, 9041, 

### 9046: 2-4600H•; 3·E70; 

### .f.-160.1 H500P; 4·300.0, 365.1-4 8-87 ·36 

### 2-2540B; 4-180.3 

### 2-2640C; 4-160.1 2-254.00 ; 4-160.2 

### 2-2540E, 25400: 

### .f.-160. 4 :V2710F; 8-070, De91, 01217, 01429 

### 2-460080,•-: 4-800.0, 876.3 8-8HO; 

### 8-0129, 03177, lM327 1·9010A;**2-4~00CN'C,G ;**  4-SSII . l 

### 8·0608, 04327 

### 2..t5310;**8· ~79**  

### 1-9080; 2-45008 2 ' 

### 1-1311 8-86-85; 8·088. 

### 0446, 02983 

### 8-D9S. 03173 , E203

REVISION 11 9/29/94 

### ., ·,

' · 

### ;: 

# t i ' 

# '

! J 

# ..

VES0ll2l5

### Tho**~e:eoced** 

### procedu:l'es are described in 

### t.he followine publications. The 

### first digit 

### of the**refere~><e** 

### nwnbeH ahoYe ore keyed to 

### the numbers ahown 

### below: 1 · 'TeatMethoda for EvaluatinaSolid 

### Wute, Physica11Cbemical Methodl", SW·i146, Tblrd 

### Edltica, 1986 

### u omended by 

### Update I (,July 

### 1992), U. S. Enviroomental Proteclion Apw;y, 

### Off'.ee ol 

### Solid Wute (}ri'IB, 

### 6286 Porl 

### Royal Road, 

### Spring!leld, VA 22 16 1) or m ore recent edition or revlaion (GPO, Supt. of Documents, 

### Washinflton, DC 20402). 2· "81aJ:JoWd 

### Metbocb ror the 

### RxamiN<tlo n ni'Wo.ter and 

### Wutewater' , 18th Editlon, 

### American Public 

### Health Alooclatlon ( 1016 Fifteenth Slleet, NW, WuJUnctan, DC 20006), 

### American 

### Water WoriDI Allocialion, Water Environment Federation, 1992, or more recent edition or update . 3· 'AMual Book 

### oC ASTM Standards', 

### American Society for Testmr and Mat!rials (1916 

### Race Street, 

### Philadelphia, PA 19013·1187) , 1992, or more recent edition or reviaion. 4· 'Metboda 

### for Chemical Analy8ia oC 

### Water and 

### Wasres', EPA-eo<l/4-7!)-020, U.S. 

### Environmental Prote<:l!oJl 

### A,erv:y , Environmental Monitoring and S upporl Laboratory**(Cincinnat~** OH 415268), aa revised 

### March 1983, or more recent reviaioo or tecbnicaJ edition. 5- Infrared Ana.lylio 

### Method in 

### IERirRTP Procedur.. Manual: Level 

### 1 Eoviroomental Aaomment (2nd E<litioo), 

### EPA-!100/'7·78-201, 

### October, 1978, or more recent edition.**Add~** Bombs", Blllletin4746, Parr Inatrument 

### Compeqy (){olioe, n. 61266 ), or more recent bulletiD. 

### 7· 'MethA:da for Organic 

### CheuW:al Analyoia 

### oC 

### Munidpol and 

### lndn.tttial 

### W..tewater, Appendix 

### A oC Title '0 Code 

### ol Federal Regulal.lons Part 

### 186, U. 8 . Environm<ntal Protection 

### Aflerv:y, En.nronmental Monitcringand Support IAboramry.Oncinnati, 

### u omendec!June 1986 or 

### marerecent 

### revision. 8· 

### "CWM Analytical**et.h~** 

### Manual', Chemical Waste Manae=ent, be., ADa(ytiml 

### Prqvama, September 

### 1992. Standard anaJytlcal 

### procedurea listed bere wbloh 

### are revised can be lmplemented upon the effective date 

### ol tbe 

### rmson, with 

### notifkalion to 

### the 

### IEPA·DLPC PenDit 8ectloa.



### WAP ·A ·B REVISION 11 912919' 

### .... 

## i i.

: 

## . .

VE SO I1 2 l6

### ' I



### ; APPENDIX WAP· B ASH AND DRY SCRUBBER SOLIDS 

### SAMPLING PROTOCOL

!.**:~** 

### i \.**~~** 

## VESOL12l7.,

. 

## ' APPENDIX WAP · B ASH AND DRY SCRUBBER SOLIDS SAMPLING PROTOCOL 1.0 PURPOSE



### '!'be TWl Iocilleral<n destroy harardous waates in high lempenlture thermal**~clatioo** Jl!'OCU'OO& 

### This Pf'ocMure provideo assurance that a r epresenlatlve sample of ash or dry scrubber aolids (DSS) is collected Cor anaJ.yai.s. 2.0 SAMPLING 

### 2.1 Sample ldentlfte&tlon

2.1.1 

### Each**~Je** 

### eontainer is 

### labeled with date, lime of day, 

### !lllmpler, and container idcntif1C8tloo 

### number. '!'be**&&~~~plea.....,** 

### logged into the 

### laboratory Production 

### Cbain-of.CUStody**I~** 

### upoo de liYel'J' 

### to tbe 

### laboraloly. 2.j 

### Sample Collection

2 .2 . 1 

### Allh and DSS eampie!l 

### are collected,**~ed** 

### aod n1!1uatod 

### on a (j\liii1VJ;y 

### baaia to enaure the reolduab met the LOR t.reo.tmeni stand&rds. 2.2.2 Sam.pletl 

### are collected 

### u outlined in 

### Section 2.2. 1 of the 

### W AP. An auger it**typical~;,** 

### U8lld to olllain 

### a repret1011tative !lllmp le of the ash 

### or DSS. Eoch oample jar 

### muat be 

### filled with ub 

### or DSS. 

### 2.2.8 Trained 

### operationa 

### peraonnel 

### will colle<lt tbe sample 

### aod 

### .ubaequentJ.y eclmowledge cuetody by completing appli:able reetion.s of the laborato.y Productlon 

### Cbain-of-custod,y logbook. Sample 

### preperati.on aod 

## 111181Yeil wW be perfo1111ed u 110011 

### u practicable foUowiJw' 

### whieh the dilpoeiQon 

### o f the eah 

### (Sectioo 4 . 0) will 

### be determined. 

### 2. 

## s Samplinlf 

### Penonnel

2 .3.1 

### lt ia the reapoosibillty of 

### Facility Managemen t 

### to 

## llllicn 011\y qualilled penonnelto perform the ub 

### or DSS 

### sa.mpling. Penoonel that ba.,. been trained 

### In the 

### implellleDialion of 

### tble procedure 

### are considered to 

### be qualified. 3.0 8AMPlJ!l ANALYSIS



### S . 1 

### Each wnple will 

### be oent to a CWM o r CWM approved lab 

### for IIJUIIylis of 

### LDR coostiluenl4 by the**appro~** method. 

### 3 . 2 The t:ncldng of 

### waste eoclee 

### lhroiJ8b the Incineration proceea to the 

### incinerator ""'iduala will be done 

### in**with** TWI Standard 

### Divialoo Practice 1661.



### W

AP·Jl.l 

### REVISION 11 

### 9!29/94 

## i 

# I I 

### ;



## i ·' VESOll2l8

## - 

# . : ' 

## ....... . ... ...

'-0 DISPOSmON OF ASH AND DRY SCRUBBER SOLIDS (DSS)



### i.J.**Any·~~** 

### or 

## !Ill
. o r 

### 0118 1\1!\t**WM SI\Dl,PI~** **for~~~ ill** **~** tQ**t.M.~wr~ ~tmem**  

### .. standard or prolu'bitlon, 

### will be retained by the facility until reoulta are avalable for 

### ovaluatlon. 

### "-2 The**~** 

### resu1t.s are evaluated agaiDit the 

### LDR treAtment at.andarde for tile codea in the container. 

### The container Ia 

### releaaed if 

### all treatment standarda are met.

..s Tbo IUUllyoi• reaults are evaluated agaiost lhe LDR treatment standards for 

### all oodee**acc:ep~** by 

### TWl . M..,tinr the

_ _ t siandarda ia demonstrated 

### throtllh the procteL "-4 When CO!Dplionce with the LDR atandarda has been demonstrated, the material will be llahllUod and subaequently disposed 

# or at CWM app roved haz.ardowl 

### waste**~ment** facilities. The manifeet and Land Dilpoaal Re.strietim Tl-eatmant 

### Cutilication will be c:ompleted 

### prior to 

### abipmeai..

BEVIBIO N 11**9~** 

## : . 

# L 1: 

# l ' I 

# I '

. I

·,

_

,. 

## VES01121S

### ·. '



# ..·1 APPENDIX WAP · C WASTE ACC EPTABn.ITY CRJTEJUA 

# r i

VES011220' 

### . . . . .. , 

## - 

## . .

APPENDIX WAP ·C W

ASTE A CCEPTABILITY CRITERIA The following**~imls** apply to tbe 

### acceptance oC W8!ia uhihitiDg errtain prcpertiea or 

### apeciJlc 

### waatee at 

### TW1 Pm to acceptance (lee Section 

### 6.2), the 

### Mandatory Analyaea and the W Mte P r oOie 

### Sheet wW be evaluated against this appendix . Any 

### reotrictiona identified 

### wlD be documented 

### on the 

### wute management deciaioo. 

### The lilt 

### oC 

### ilema Wider eedl 

### ofth_, heedis:lp is not 

# .....,,to be exhaustive. The prolillng process will include 

### a review 

### of the 

### MSDSo and 

### a search 

### of the other bibliographic 

### reiiOUI'Cel (eee Appendix WAP ·FJ for e;ytlOI\)'1Il8, product llAIIle&, common 

### namea. The nature of the restrictiona are at follawo: 

### REJECT • The!e Ma ter!a!t may not 

### be P roceued at the facility . 

## Rt"ffltiye Waatea

Radioactive materials aa def=d by tbe TWI Part B RCRA Permit, or ereater 

### tJJan 0.6 

### mlllirada per bour (per Seotl on SJ .4) 

### Permit I&nited 

### W"'" 

### F020 F021 F 022 

### F023 F027 

### F028 PCBa > 

### 60 ppm (or other 

### TSCA regulaLed 

### PCBs)

WAP-c-1 REVISION 11 

### 9129/94 

### ! . l 

# I



# I I H 

## VES011221ReguJptory Soedl!ed 

## Treatment Teebno)ogy 

## o!her than Incineration DOOB"N"tCd Batteries
--- 

### D008 Lead acid 

### Batteries K009 Non-Calcium Sulfate Qther Una&!!e!l!able Waot.es

SPECIAL PACKAGING · Wastes**exhibit~** the properties listed below 

### (water / u r-eacllve, 

### malochrou2, rapid heat**~- )**  durine the 

## prolllini: prooe!l8 may 

### he aecepted 

### If they are 

### ohipped in epeclal Jl8cltt81ng ,**ro~** on site or if the material conforms to 

### opoe!llcatiOM allowing proeaaing 

### In eximng 

### TWI facilit.lea . WatfJr!Air Reaetlve Wutes



### P .mhloratea Thionyl ehloride 

### Phoopborouo Metal hydridt8 Silanes 

### Chlorolormalea Oleum Other wa ter or 

### air reactive wastes



### WAP-C-2 REVISIO N 11 

### 11/29194 

## ' I . 

# I

.j

I 

# ' I I



### ' ! · i 

### '

i

# r VESOI12 22

### Ma!odorouo Compounds 

### Meroaptane Sulfides 

# ww which exhibits enmretle 

### eh&racterillie! Waate which 

### exhibits one.,..tlc characteristlcl (c.,., prcpellanta, 

### ""!'k>eivee. pyr<>i.c<hni<o, n• ....,.ble liqttio:k. etc. } 

### will eic.ber be atcepted per the Small 

### Quantity Cbemical 

### ,wdelinea 

### cw will be 

### e:copted per the 

### followin& procedure. 

### Wben the volwx:e cl 

### a 

# -IU'etUD or 

### cbaDsea in iD<ineraror peft0<1D&IICe 

### indlcateo that 

### a larger charge size 

### Ia warr&Dted, 

### 'IWI will 

### fonow the following pr;l<ledure: 1) The material will be r<Mewed using 

## mereuce informat.loD, 

### MSDSe where 

### availabl&, generator dlacusoiona or pr<Mouo experience. Baaed 

### on tbia r eview, 

### TWI will cletermille if a 

### 1areet clwge lift ie acceptable. 

### 2) When It bas been 

### determined that 

### a**~Areer** 

### charie llhe Ia 

### lltlOepteble, TWI wW either: a) 

### Determine if 

### Lhla type ofmaterial bas 

### been prevlooaiY proceeeed &1 

### TWI in larger charlfl 

### oisea and Lhereby 

### eateblillh a**·~** 

# me; or b) 

### Conduct a 

### test burn of the material 

### to determine what charge 

### lise would be acceptable. Tbia 

### teat bum will 

### atsrt with the quantity apeoified in the 

### SQOG' o clthe 

### eneflldk**~nt** aDd be iD<reued by DO Dlllre than double the preYWWI 

### charie from tbia darting 

### point balled on the lnclnerator operation&. The 

### incineo-ator operation& parameten ..-bleb will be ewlueled 

### to detenolne if cbarge 

### .tze am be lncreaaed will be aa 

### folio we: > 

### Vacuum d........., in the primary 

### or secondary chamber. 

### > 

### Temperatlll'e i.ru:reeae in 

### the primary 

### chamber cl 

### > 

### lOO"F > 

### Vlaual interruption cl the primary flame > 

### Noo · atead,y state pa Dow. 

### NOTE: Tbia 

### teet prowca!IIUQ' be 

### utiliud to eatablish revi8ed charge lizes 

### for 1111 matoria.la pteriouiJy limited in the 

### SQOG ;a. 

### Teat burn documeolatioo will be prooided 

### to the 

### IEPA·DLPC prillr 

### to implementins 

### Jar'"' <barge 

# .uea.

WAP.C.S REVlSION 11 

### 9/2.9/94 t • I 

## 1 I 

# l 

# l

I 

# l ! 

# I l [ 

### I ! 

# I I' i 

## i 

# ,. ! 

# !

V E S011223· . 

### " DIO:pNTESTJNG • 

### Wutes which COD**laiD~** thaD 

### O.Ol .. of 

### thMecon.Utuenta require dioxin



### . analysis at. a 

### l.pp m . thNtlhold bero re .acceptanee. .. . - · -·· · -- . . Etbon (2{2, 4,6-tricllloropben.O'IJ) ·ethyl 2,2-<lichlorcpropenote )) 

### Heucllloropbem (2,2-metbylene
-bis IM,EHrlchlorophenolD 2,4,6·trichlorophenol 2,4,6-trichloropbonol 

### 2,4,6-T 

### 2,4,6-TP (2,( ,6-t.richlorophenoJIY """tlc acid)**(2·(2,4,6-triclllotophenoJ~Y )**  propenoic acid, SUvu) 

### 2,8,4,6-tetracb!Cll'Ophenol Pentacbloropheool (PCP) Ronnel (0,0
- di.nctbyl 0·(2,4,6·tricbloropheo,yl)phoephorothloare) 

### Debris from 

### fire invoMnc 

### PCBa or the 

### compcunds lieted 

### above Some or lbeae W118\es (Silva, 2,ol,6·T, ond PCP) are detected by the ocrea>ing tala wbiob will be employad 

### oo c1io1in euepeet wute 

### etreema per the 

### TWI Dioxin 

### Suopect Wute Policy . Additio!lal waotee**lilted~·** it 

### indicated by tbe « enerator on the pror.J.e inrormaUon, wiD be 

### tested uaing 

### 11111 

## cbromato8faPh**~** 

### Tbe**fOlio~** 

### are 

### brend name product4 

### whiob indude 

### the compo1mda 1ist.ed above (thia 

### H.t ia not loteoded 

### to be all incluaive): AMCBEM 

### AMINE 2,4 , 6-T 

### AQUA· VEX B&USH· BHAP 

### BRUSHTOX DACINE DE!).WE ED DOUBLE STRENG'm 

### DOWCIDE3 DOWCIDE6 DOWCIDE2S DOW CIDE EC-7 

### DOWCIDE G-ST 

### ENVERTDT ENVERTT EMUI.SAMINE BK 

### ESTERONE FARMCO FENCE RIDER FENOPBOP FOBBON FRUlTONET 

### INVE1n'ON 245 

### KURON KUROSAL UNBRIDBR 

### PENCHLOR PENTACON PENWAR 

### PBILTOX REDDON 

### SANTOBBITE SM'TOPHBN 

### SILVI·BAP SINmJHO WAP-c.4 SFONTOX 

### SUPER D WEEDONE T·NOX TORMANA 

### TRANSAMINE 

### TRIBUTON TRINOXOL U 46 VEON2t6 

### VEB'l'ON 2T VISKO RRAP LOW 

### VOLATILE ESTER WEEDAB 

### WEED·B · GONE WEI!DBBADS 

### WEEDONE BEVISION 11 

### 9129/94 

# F ! 

# I' !



## VES011224

# . .. ,_, . ..... 

## .. ; 

## .... 

## . . . . ...... 

# r:

- -.f

### APPENDIX WAP ·D DETERMINATION OF INCOMING WASTE**CONFORMAN~ONCONFORMANCE**



## I 

# I I I

# I 

# I I. VES 0 11225

### APPENDIX WAP·D**--- ~~~~C!** **W~TE CQI'fl>O~CJ!;IN.9~·QQ.NF9..RMANJ;:E**  ____ 

## ln<lomine waste may vary from the informatioo determined during 

### the 

### profiling plwe 

### due to the variability 

### in the 

### proceea**~neratlni** the - 

### or in 

### collectloo of the wute moteriaL In 

### or<ler lo 

### determlDe whether a perticular incomlng waste stream conforms 

### to the profile, 

### the following criteria WI be uaed . All other 

### Mondato.-y and 

### SllJlplemental analyeia 

### dAta collected 

### will be ueed 

### to allow 

### TWI to 

### delenuine the beat 

### method for proceain8 the ,..... material 

### 1 . pH 

## Sc:reen: A variation in the 

### pH 11om 

### the l'8ll£" apecifled in 

### the 

### pro11Je**~nt.o** may 

### indlcste a change in the waste atreem. If a pH variation beyond the range 

### apedied on the 

### liquid prollle 

### sheet, the 

### procedures ouUiited in 

### Section 6.2-4 will be Initiated 

# < •·lr·• a waate wbiclt is 

### oormally neutral ia 

### found to be eorrooive). Moterlala will be evaluated 

### for conformance u toUows: ProiJ!i"R' Ana!yti.ca!Re6ult Ag;eptable Bange <2 <2 2-12.6 2·12.5 

### > 12.6 

### > 12-b Wuteo 

### pr<>tiled u pH 2 to pH 12.5 but abipped 

### with an aocompeeying LDR form for 0002 will be considered oonforming at pH < 2 or pH > 12.6 if aorpported by 

### the prallJ..t 

### ehemi<:el eonstitlw!ta. 

### 2. &mprN!!tv 

### Po!entlal Screen; 

### A variAtion in 

### the thermal activity from tbe 

### lndioators specifted in 

### the p!Ofile clocwoents 

### will 

### indicate a cbanp in 

### the Wllllle otream. If the variation 

### c:auoea a ebanp ill lhc bu4rd claM o( tbe 

### wtUOte. the procedures outlined in Section 6 . U will be Initiated (e.g. a 

### material which did 

### not**~it** 

### Oamm•hilily potential in 

### the 

### profillnf plwe doea 

### during the incoming shipment procedures). S.**~** The unexpected preaence 

### of PCBo 

### > 60 ppm contrary 

### to that apecified 

### in the ptoliJe 

### clocummt.o 

### will Indicate 

### a 

## thaace in the 

### waste otream, 

### which would initiate the 

### procedurea outJiDad in Se:Qon 6.2.4. TWI i1 not permitted to aooept PCBo 

### > 60 ppm or TSCA derivl!d PCB wutea. 4, R•djpj!yjly Scr!m; 

### The pretl!noe ofradioactive lll&teriala aa dotermined by 

### the radloadMty screen (lee 

### Section 

# au) will 

### inlt.late the 

### procedures u outlined in 

### Section 6.2.4, leading to rejeclioo 

### ofthe material



### WAP-!H REVISION U 

### 9129/94 

# l I 

# I I 

# I i · 

# i 

# i

VESOl1226

### 5 . Apparent Vilcooi ty: A eignif\can t Vlll'iation in 

### the apparent vlleooity from 

### tNt specified in 

### the pr<>iile

, - · ·**~~ wfll** **jn~e !_C** **~** tn**~!_Ute** &tretu!t

_ lbat . would**~t.e ~** **~edurc !_** **OU ~**  

## IJ! Section 5.2.4.



### W AP· D ·2 REVISION 11 

### 9/29/94 

# I 

# I '

VES01122'i

# . ' 

### . .. . 

# . . ......**~. :**  '• 

# .**~** I 

# .

APPENDIX WAP · E CONTAINEIUZED WAS'l'E t SPECIAL SAMPLING PROCBDURES 

# . I

·.,

;



## VES011228

### APPENDIX WAP·E**~J:IT~ W~TE;**  

### fH'ECIAL**SMt~PI,.!NG PROCEQUJlES**  LO 

### PURPOSE Tbls pro:edure provi dn 

### asaursnce 

### that repouentative samples 

### oCtile 

## followine coolalneriled 

## wams ore ool.loc:tod fnr analysj& SpecillcaQy, these are containerised wuteo oC debrio &Dd 

### lilte material, odhelliws and 

### other**~** 

### elaatic aubal.aDceo, and re.lna and other hard lllllterials. Repreaent.atlve aamplee are eollected by 

### uaing multipoint aampline. 

### 2 . 0 OEPINITIONS 2.1 Debrio and 

### like mat.erial
- includes wood, bricks, 

### CClllCI"ete, vegetation, plutic 

### aheetillg, protective elothina:, etc. 

### 2.2 Adhesives and odJer higbJy elastic materiall- sticky, gl-like, gummy, llzelcl>able**material~.** 

### 2.3 Reeine and 

### other bard 

### materiala • plaatb&Dd 

### plutlc 

### compooeots, opozieto and 

### other phyllcally 

### similar 

### mat.eriala 

### that have hardened or cured. 2. 4 

### Multipoint 811Dlple • 

### A aemple eompoaed oC 

### rubsamplea aolleeted from the 

### oeme eoftlainer that is 

### represmlatlve the CCDteslta of

### the cootalner. S

. . O 

### lNSPECI'fON Eeeh eonta!Mr will be 

### evaluated prior 

### to openinlto 

### detA!nnine it '• intogrity. Al\er openina, the container' s CIXIIOlll.t 

### will be 'lisually 

### lnopect.ed to determiDe whether or not it eonforma with ita profiled dncripl.lan. 

### U PERCENT 

### SAMPLED See Waste ADaJy.il 

### Plan Sectioo 6-L 

### 6-0 SAMPLING Multipoint IISJDplee**~** 

### oo inepeetioo will be eoUec:ted fruD 

### contai:lers oelecUd 

### for aampllog. 

### Samplioc equiJ"DD'll will 

### be oe l oeud**~** Oil reru1t:a o r the iDopectioL 

### Semple• will be 

### in CWM custody 

### from eample 

### eollectloo Wltil traMI'er or ....tod,y to the anal,ticel laboratory. 

### Sampling equipment 

### will be decontaminated prior to and af\er wnpllne Hdl
- atreem.



### WAP ·E- 1 REVISION 11 

### 9/29194 '. l. .**VES0112 2~** 

# . . ' 6.1 IUGHLY ELASI'IC SUBSTANCES



### .. -**~~ !'ll!!.** **l!!Mr.** 

### )\igh)J(_ele.m:**•~** 

### '!'ill\!olJNIIllpJed.Yrilh a.acoop .«liloxel and ocisaoro 

### or t.oop. The procedure is 14: 

### &1.1 dip the shovel or oeoop into the 

### JDatmel 

### to the d &ptb of the blade and rotAte; 6.1 .2 lift the ..._ 

### or above! wi th the 

### aample and 

### cut wilb 

### t.he tci.non o.- 

### touaw, 

### u appropriate; 6.1..3 wind the bangina portion 

### of tbe 

### aample onto the oooop 

### or shovel and 

### transfer lbe aomple 

### to the aample eontainer by !ICI'&J)ine t.be 

### ID&Ierial &om 

### the shovel or 

### scoop into the sample 

### container. 

### 6.2 D EBRIS AND LIKE MATERIAL Debris 

### and like materials 

### will be umpled with 

### acilaoro, 

### bounmM, chile! md tollp aa 

### appropriale. The procedure il to: 

### U.l 

### use hammer 

### and chisel to collec:t aampleo ofwood, brick 

### or other bard msterial from the top of 

### the container and place In the lllllple 

### container will!**~** 

### 5.2. 2 use .,....,... to cut temple oftyvelt and ctber 

### eeall1 Mable materialo (peddlng, 

### rubber, plastic 

### aheet.lng,**e~.)** 

### and place 

### In aample 

### container with tcDp. 

### 5.8 R&SINS AND/OR OTHER HARD MATERIALS Resina and/UI' other bard material& will be """'Pled with a 

### hammer, cbiael and 

### ump or 

### acocp. The procedure il to: 

### 6.8.1 Uae hammer and 

### chilel to 

### N<iuee roMerial(o) eise 10 that 

### it ,_ euily be placed in 

### a tllllllple c:ootainer and place the oample in the con + einer wll.h 

### tooaa o.- ecoop . 6.0 SAMPLING PERSONNEL



### 7 .0 It 

### ia the
-**~** 

### oC h:llity 

### Management to auign only 

### qualified per10111141 to perform 

### opeclalized lllllllpilngofcoataineriud 

### waste. PeriiOOIIel that have 

### been trained in the 

### lmplementetinn of 

### thl.o 

### procedure are COilOiidered to be 

### qualified. SAMPLE ANALYSIS Slllllpi9 will be**~ed** 

### e.a epecifled 

### in &ctiona 

### 3.1, 8.2, md 3.8, and Ficufo 8·1 of 

### the WAP . Adtiitlcoal analy8il 

### will be performed at the requeo\ of 

### the Facility !laDagement. WAP-1!}2 REVlBION 11 

### 9fl9l94 

## . .. 

## I I I 

### ! 

## ' .

; \ 

### '·



## VES011230

# .. ·



### APPENDIX WAP-P BIBUOGRAPHY OF STANDARD CBEMJCAL REFERENCE MA'I'EBlAL8



## VES01123 1

## ·· ···

1.



# s.

4.


### 5.

6.

7.


### 8.

9.


### 10.



### .. 

## .

: APPENDIX WAP·F**_. !J~O~~**  

### OF**~~ARD** 

### fHEMICAL**~~NCE MA~**  

### .. The Merclr. Index, Current Edition, 1983 Merclt & 

### Co . Inc., Rahway, 

### NJ. Dangerous Properties of 

### Industrial Chemicale, Current Edition 

### 1989, Van Noet:and Reinhold, 

### NY 

### NY.

ColldeD&ed Cbcmnl DieUonary , Current Edition, 

### 1987 Van Noatrand Reinhold,NY NY . CWld AS...a<l computeriled MSDS eyltem, 

### current venion.

Farm Chemicals '91, 

### Meister Publishlng 

### Co.
Chemical Synon)'IDI & 

### Trade 

### Nomee, Current 

### Editioo, 1987 Qo_,- 

### Tec:!mical 

### Pre. .

Handbook cl Reactive Cbemicek, CurTent Editioo, 

### 1985 

### L. 

### Bretllerick.

Handbook of Cbemiotry & 

### P!lyaicl, Current EdWon, 1976 CBC Preoa.

WAP·F-1 REVlSION U 

### 9129194 

## VES01123 2

# I [ 

# I

·.,



### AP l >END IX WAP-G Hl\H81 COMPA T IBILITY CLASSES

I.



## VES011233< . 

## . 

# .

; 

### DQ'l'CJMO 1 . 1
- 1.6 

### 2 . 1- 2.2 

### 8 4 .1 4 .2 4.8 

### 5 .1 

### 5.2 2 . 3 

### 6.1 8 9 APP END IX WAP - G 

### HM · I8 1 C OMPATIBlL 'llY CLASSES**~** 

### E• plosi•es AerOISOI 

### Cans F\flllUrulble Liquid Flammable Solids Spootaneously Combustibles 

### Dangerous When Wet 

### Oxidizers O

rpnic Peroxides P oiiiODOWI Gas 

### Zone A & 

### B Poioon0011 Liquid Zone A Corrosiv .. Mi.....UIIDMOJS 

### N. O .S. Debris N on - Hatnr dous Mate r ial



### W

Al' · G·l 

### IIEVISION 11 

### 9/29/94 

### ' 

## ,..



# ..

· ·

.

VES011234

### CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PCB SCREENING POUCY 

## ......•,.

R evisio n 1 October 

### 1991 

### 0 · · ...... · · · ·u 

## i**VES01123~** 

# I

i 

## '. 

## l. I. 

### f

## .. ..**~** 

## .. . 

## CWM PCB SCREENING POUCY

L INTR ODUCT1oli The TolCic Subs1ances Control 

### Act {TSCA} Is the prim ary source 

### of f ederal regulalloos affecting the management of 

### Polychlorinated**Biph~nyis** 

### (PCBs). Mo st of the provisions of the TSCA regulations specified in 

### 4 0 CFR Part 

### 761 apply t o PCBs 

### only 

### if PCBs are p resent in concentratiol'ls above specf'i ed levels . 

### The 40 CFR Part 

### 761 subpart D Storage and D i sposal provis i ons apply generally to material at concentrations of 

### 50 parts per milllon 

### (ppm) and above . Howeve r, no provision specifying a PCB concentration may be 

### avoided by di luti ng PCB containing materials unless othflfWise specifically provided. · Furthe rmo re, 

### the Resource Conservation and 

## Recovery Act (RCRA) is 

## an**add ~ional**  

### source of federal regulations affecting 

### the management of 

### hazardous waste containing PCBs . 

### The l and disposal of 

### l quid hazardous wastes cootaining PCBS 

## at concentrations greater 

### than or equal to 

### 50**p~** 

### is prohibited 

### under the**-~** 

### provisions 

### of 

### 40 CFR Part 

### 268 . 32 (a)(2) . 

### The land disposal of liquid or non Uquld hazardous waste contain i ng h a logenated organic compounds (HOCs) includng PCBs (see 

### 40 CFR Part 

### 268 Appendix 

### Ill for a listing of 

### HOCs) at concentrations equal to or greate r than 1000 

### mg/l. 

### or 1000 mg/kg, respectlvely, 

### Is pro hi b i ted under the 

### provis ion s of 

### 40 CFR Part 

### 268 . 32 ( a )(3), (e)(1) , 

### and (e)(2) 

### the " California 

### Ust.• In 

### addition , 

### the management of liquld 

### hazardous waste con tanng PCBs at concentrations of 

### 50 ppm 

### or above 

### as wei 

### as liq u i d or non liquid hazardous wastes containing HOCs including PCB & 

## (see 40 CFR Part 

### 268 Appendix 

### Ill for ist 

### of HOCs) in tota l concentrations equal to or greater 

### than 1000 

### mg/L or 1000 mg,1(g 

### for liquld 

### or solid, respectively , 

### are specified 

### under the provisions 

### of 40 CFR Part 

### 268 .42. Finally , 

### the land disposal of hazardous w aste containing PCBs 

### and Identified 

### by the**~sted** 

### hazardous waste 

### code numbers 

## K08S and 

## F 039 (multi-source leachate) is regulated unde r 

### Specific 

### Land Disposa l Restrictions (LOR) provisions under 

### 40 C FR Part 

### 268 .43. These regulati ons**req~Ne** 

### PCBs to 

### be trea ted to the 

### following l evels {Table 

### I) prior to 

### land disposal.



### 2 Revision 1 Octobe r 1991 ' I 

# i .j 

# i.

!**~** ;· l 

## i

VES011236

### PCB Screen in g Po l icy

K08 5 

### & F039 Aroctor 1016 Aroclo r 1221 Arodor 1232 Aroc lo r 1242 Aroclor 1248 Arodor 1254 Arodor 1260 TABLE I Waste Water 

### mg/l. 0 . 013 0 . 01 4 0 . 013 0 . 017 0 . 013 0 . 01 4 0.014 Non-Was t e Water mglkg

0.92 0.92 0 .92 0 . 92 0. 92 1.8 1 . 8 Stat e and l ocal agencies and perm its may also regulate 

### the management of PCBs. Compliance with these regulati ons 

### is required whe r ever 

### they are mor e stringent than fede ral regulation-s (e . g ., certain 

### states require that 

### the PCBs be repo rt ed on a dry weight 

### basis) . Add iti onally , TSCA addresses P CBs, not Aroclora. This includes 

### incidentally 

### produced PCBs a nd fore ign produced materials that 

### include Clopheno , Phe noclor • . Py ra le nee, Kane chlor • , and Feodor • I n order to assure that 

### the appropri ate practices are 

### being applied consistently throughout Chemical Waste M anagement , 

### Inc . (CWM) regarding 

### the management of was tes wh i ch 

### may potentially 

### contain PCBs , 

### It is important t o define p r ocedures to be emp l oyed throughout the 

## company. The r e

fore , the foll owing Policy and P rocedures 

### has been developed .

3 

### Revi s ion 1 October 1 991 

# I i I 

### ! 

### \ 

## j VESOll237 1-.. ' 

## '

### PCB Screening Policy

A . 

### The treatment, storage, and disposal of 

### any TSCA regulated waste sh an occur only at 

## a TSCA approved tr eatment, storage , or disposal facility. 

### B . All PCB analyses 

### requited as a 

### result of 

### the application of 

### this policy sh all 

### be performed by 

## a CWM laboratory or a C WM app roved waste laboratory. C. 

### Any w aste ltlat will be analyzed 

### for PCBs 

### in 

### accordance with this policy shaU 

## not be eccepted f or storage , treatment. or disposal until P C B analyses 

### have been completed and 

### evaluated . 

# o . Any non-TSCA waste w hich meets 

### the folowing crit9ria 

# shan be treated as a PCB su spect waste until 

### demonstrated 

### otherwise, through chemical ana l ysis. Ill

. PCB SUSPECT WASTE CRfTERIA The 

### following criteria 

### have been developed by 

### Chemical Waste M anagement , 

## Inc. through its 

### extensive operating experienCes as 

## we n as 

### through review of 

### various sources of literature 

### for defining a waste as 

### being PCB Suspect. 

### These criteria 

### a

re intended to s upplement existing requirements 

### which may have been imposed through 

### permit conditions , admin istrative orders, or other ag r ee ments 

### with federal or state regulatory agencies . 

### A. Ge nerator-Defined P CB Waste 

### Any wasti for 

### which the generator 

### has Indicated 

### on the "Generator' s Was te Material Profile Sheet" 

## or any other s upporting documentation that P CBs 

### are presen t below regulated levels.

4 

### Revision 1 October 

### 1991 

## VE SOJ 1238

### PCB Screening Policy B .**l?i~ S.ea~**  

### Waste NOTE : , Dil bearin g wastes are define d as a ny material (liquid, solid, organi c, or aqueous) containing oil as described 

## on the 'Generator's Waste M

aterial Profile Shee t" (other support rn g documentation) OR any material 

### which exhibits the visual presence of 011. 

### 1he v is ual pre::ence of oil may 

### include , but is not**llm~ed** 

### to, an 

### Oil emulsion , oil 

### film, oll phase, or water 

### soluble 

### 011. It is 

### the responsibility o f the 

### Laboratory M anagef at each d'rvision to use sound judgment based on their analytical experience to make the final determination If 

### a waste st ream exh i bits the visua l presence of oil. 

### C. M un i c ipal Waste Wate r Treatment Facility Sludge 

### D . B ulk Laboratory Wastes E . Baghouse Dusts from Secondary Smelters (e.g., copper, 

### aluminum) F . Any Wasta as Des i gnated by the Laboratory Manager G . All Wastes, Liquids or Solids, from 

### the following : 

### 1. Electrical Utility Company 

### 2. 

### Natural 

### Gas Pipe Une 

### Trans mission Company 

### 3. SOlvent Recovery , Reuse or 

### Recycling Unit 

# 4

: Oil Recovery, Re use or Recyc li ng Unl1 

## 5.**0~** 

### Maintenance Centers 

### 6. Pond 

### Closures (includlng Pond Sludges and Dredgings) 

### 7. Remedial Action Supertund Sites 8. RCRA Corrective Action P roject • 

### 9. Timber/Lumber Treating Facility 

### 10. Hydraulic 

### Equipment 11 . ENRAC Remedial Action PrOjects•

• U nless 

### demonstrated non-TSCA



# s Revision 

### 1 October1991**VES01123~**

### P C B 

### Screen ing Polley

- 12. -- Hea t Transfer Units · ·- · · · - - .. _ -



### 13. Metal Machining (Cutting) Operations 

### 14. Pesticide/ H e rbicide Man ufacturing 

### 15. Ink and Pi gment Manufacturing 

### 16 . Oil 

### Based Paint Manufacturing 

### 17 . Paper Recycling Operations 

### 1 8 . Roofing**Fe~** 

### Manufacturing or Process ing 

### 19. Auto 

### Fk.rff 20 . Non -WMI Waste Trea1ers 21. Chlorobenzene Manufacturing 

# rv. PROCEDU RES 

### A. Pre-Acceptance Samples Pre-acceptance samp l es are to 

### be analyzed 

## tor . PCBs 

### by 

## a laboratory 

### if the was te stream meets 

### any of 

### the criteria spee!fted 

### n section 

### n1 above . 

### B . Incoming Waste Shipment Samples 

### The need to analvze Incoming waste shipment samples for PCBs will 

### be established by 

### the results 

### of 

### the sales sample analysis 

### and e va l uation 

### of the sales sample Waste Profile 

## Sheet information 

### against 

### this policy . 

### Table II describes 

### the overaR requirements 

### discussed below . 

### If a waste stream 

### does 

## not meet 

### any 

### of 

### the PCB suspect 

### criteria, then there is 

## no specffic requirement to perform PCB 

## antJyses on the incoming 

### shipments of this waste stream unless 

### specifically required 

### under a Waste 

### Analysis 

### Plan (W 

### AP) .

6 Revision 

### 1 October 1991 

### V ESOII24( l l' 

## - I 

### PCB Scree ni ng Pol i cy

_II**a~~ --** **~eam meet~** **~y** of

### ~ __ 

### PCB**~sp:ect** 

### Criterlll ..**t_he** 

# ..**s~~**

### .. sample analys i s indicates PCBs are less than 5 ppm' Of' 

### the regul atory Umlt (The 

### EP-.( TSCA office has recently specified concen tr ations of less than 

### 2 ppm PCBs in treatment residues for approval and refe r to Tab le I for listed code specifications} , wtlldlever IS lower , the n the laborato ry/tec:hn ical manager must specify 

### on the Waste Management Oecisron (WMD) whether PCB analyses oo incoming 

### waste sh i pments are reql.ired and , if 

### so, 

### the frequency of 

### analyses .

' The specific criterion of 

## 5 ppm Is 

### the typical laboratory reporting limit for PCB analysis. It 

### Is a cons ervative approach to protecting the integrity 

### of non·TSCA 

### facilities .

7 

### Revision 1 October 

### 1 99\ 

# ! ' ;



## . i

i 

# i

V E S011 2 41

### PCB 

### Sc r ee ni ng Po li cy



## ..TABLE 11

# ----------**1** 

# ...**~** 

# I

Lllb D.ca CWU or Gan«1tor 

# --- ......._ Not • Surpoct >6 ppm PCI < 6 ppm PCI (WMD I N o Action ll oquitod



### Meets PCB Suspect Cr lt . e rl a *S ales Sample 

### P C B Resu lt s ( Yaal 

# ' ( WMDI F requency ol Test ing l Y M or N o I 

# ' I WMDIII Ya r Froq•oncy ol T olling



### Rece ivi ng P rocedur es



# · - - ---------------·--·· ·· ···-··- · ---- N

o Yes 

### <5 ppm



### Yes 

## >5ppm

• or the regulatory**~mit,** 

### whichever i s lower.



### 8 No specific acti ons required. 

### Specl1y 

## In Waste Management Decis i on**(W~D)** 

### whether PCB 

### analyses 

## on incoming waste shipments 

### are required and, II so , the frequency 

### of analyses. 

### WMD 

## must specify that PC B 

### analyses 

### are required on incoming waste 

### shipments and must specify 

### the frequency 

### of 

# those ana l yses .



### Revi sion 1 Octo ber 1991 

## VE SO I1 24 i I**i~**

# (i lradl Waste Incineratio n 7 Moble A"lflltW 

## s...goo .ll. 82201 · •Qj59 6181271·2804



### 'l'R&D. 

### 11&8-r.: IRCJR.... 'I'JOII DIOZJR 808P8C'I' ARaLY818 POLICY

I' 

## .· 

# ..

•

VESOll243

### 'I'IU DIOJC II &JIALYSIS POLICY I . 

### llmtODOCTlOI 

### Trade Waate Incineration ia iaplementinv thia policy for the acreeninv of waatea whic h ma r cont ain diosina. Thia . policy wi l l id e nt ify th e ty pea of waatea which auat be analysed for dioxin • or dioxin p r e cur s or s prior to appr oval for a cc ep t an ce aa a waate atream at TMl. 

### Implementation o f thia pol i cy w ill provide a meana ot enaurin9 that potentiaLly dio:llin contami nated waatea a r e analysed for dioxin cont.nt aad aubaeqllentlr**~aved** 

### appropriately ac cordiD9 to appli c ab l e sta t e an d federal re9u l ati ona . Th e f i nal decision to .-nave a diosin bearinv waate •uat be made accordinv to . the condi tiona and reatrictiona of the voverni119 fa cili tr**W~e** 

### Analya ia P l an and operatinv**pe~ta .** **:~** II. 

### POLICY 

### A. Waate atre..a cont.-plated for aanav.-.nt at TWI will be aubjeeted to the Diodn Suapect 

## w .. te 

### Criteria durinv the deciaion eva l uation proceaa of the profilin9 pro c edure . B . lfaaha which are deterained to -et the Diosi n Suspect · Waate criteri a will 

### req ui re anaha i a for diosin precuraora prior to ac c eptance and aaoav..aot t or treat.ant and diapoaal at t he facilitJ. c. Mutea which are found to contain diosin pre our aora at or above t be aite a ction l evel for precuraora will require diosin analraia prior to a cc eptan c e and manavement for treat-.nt and diapoaal at the facilitr. D. llut .. which are found to conta i n dioai na at or above the aite action l evel will not be ac c epted for lii&Dav-nt for tr .. ta.nt and diapoaal at the facility until auch time that treat .. nt and diapoaal are all owed acc o rdinv to tbe collllitiou and r .. trictiona of the**~overnin9** 

### hci lit r 

# w

.. te Analraia Pl an and operatinv per.ita .



## VE SOJI24< 

## '.

### 111 . DIOXII IUSPICY WASYK**CR1~**

### .. IA The followin 9 criteri a has been developed for defin ing a vaate as diozin su1pe ct. These c riter i a are intended to suppl ... nt e:dsting reqllir-nh which ... , have been im posed through permit cond ition s , admini s t ra tiv e ord ers , or oth er ag r e ... nts vitb federal or sta t e authoritiea . waatea aonaidered under the .. c riteria r - in aub j ect to a ll uiati ng con d itio ns impoaed hf C hemical Waste Managemen t pol ia iea and env ironment al dir ec tiv ea . A.



# • • Generat o r D e fi ned Diczin Waste . ... 

# .. .. . ADJ vaate for which the generator baa 

### indicated on the "Generator ' • Waate Material Profile Sheet" or aDJ 

### other supporting documentation that dio1ina o r diodll preaur aora are preaent at aDJ' 

### l aval . : i· 

# w

.. tea Proa the Poll owing : Theae w .. 

### tea · vi 11 be 

### ao naidered aa auapect if 

### they IUJ' 

### have been aub j e at to hiatoric . al aontaaination froa diozina or diozin pre au raora , or if the waataa contain a known diozin or diozin precuraor .. tarial . 1 .**Ti~er/Lu.ber** 

### Treating Pacilitiea . 2. Peati ci de/ Rerbia i de Manufacturing Pa aili tiea . 3. Manufacturera or Proa.. aea Uain91 a) · mono- , di -, tri- , or tetraoblorophenola, and their cbloro-pbeno&J derivative acida , eatera , .-i-na , and other aal t a . b) peatachlorophanol a) .aoo- , di- , tri -, tetra ·, penta -, o r hezachlorobensenea . d ) triohlorophenozrpropionia acid ( ailvez ) e) trichlorophenozracetic acid ( 2 , 4, 5
- T ) f ) 

### hezachl o rophene 4 . C oabuation pro4uota froa aource1 outside of the CWM/ WMX Teahnologiea fa.ilr of co.p aniea where auch c oabuation occurred under uncontrolled conditione and t he**fo~tion** 

### of dio&ina or diosin related ca.pounda ia auapeated to have occurred ( i.e. the c oabuation of PVC, C PVC , etc .). c. Wutea b .. riog 

# •rA beaardoua vute nwabera POll , P039 ,**~001 .** **~015 ,** **~016 ,** **~030 ,**  

### K042 , K043 ,**~015, ~099** **, ~1** **05,** 

### U49 , n5o , and 

### n51 . 

## l· I

## ~

# ~ I



# . i:

i



# . '· i· I



## :i ' 

# I' I' 

## )' I . I



# .. j I 

### ' ' 1! I I 

## ; I ' ' I



# " l ; 

## ''

VES011 245

## .•·.



### } IV • PllOCEDO'UB 

## Dio zin precurs o r analyaia lll&l' 

### be 

## conducted b}' HPLC, G C or GC/MS, or**i~ a**  

## .. a:r acre en te c hnique• f a ll ow i ng approved EPA methoda or CMK MOdification• of such -th od a . l . 

## Profile Appr o val 1-.p l ea : Profile approval aa.plea are to be 

## anal:rud for diozin precuraon if 

## the waste stream meets an:r of the criteria**apeeified t~**  

## aection III above . Waatea which are being reproUled or recertified due to ohangea in**t~** 

## procea1 9enerat i n9 the waate , or aa a reaul t a · f generator informati on gathered 4urill9 tbe nap- oonforaance reaolution durin; incoaing anal}'ah -r:e alao aubjeot to the criteria apecified in**1ect~** 

### 111 . i 

## 2 . Incoain9 Waate**Shi~t** 

## Sample• : a } The need to anal}'ae incoain; vaate ahipaent aa8plea for di o llin precuraora will be eatabliahed b:r the reaultl of the profile approval aa.ple anal}'aia and an evaluation of the vaat• pt'ofi le aheet infor..tion a;ainat the criteria eatabliahed in thia polio:r . b ) If a vaate atreu do .. not Met an}' of the c riteria eatabliahed in aection lli of this polio}', then there ia no apecific requir.-.nt to perfora dio11n preouraor anal}'aia on 

## the inooain9**abi~t** 

## auplea of tbe waate atreu . c) It the receipt .. terial d-.onatratea a cban9e in the vaate fro. the profile approval auple (i . e. infor.ation provided b}' the 9-erator dur i n; the non-oonfor.&Doe reaolution proceaa ), and 

## it now ... 

## ta tbe criteria eatabl iahecl in aection li 1 of thi1 poli o }' , then diolin precuraor anal}'lia DNat be 

## perforaed aa part of the incoain9 anal}'ail . d ) 

## Maatea which .. et the criteria eatabli1hed in section III of thi1 polio}' aad wbich e&hibited negative screen reaults for dio&in precuraora durin9 profile approval anal:r1is will not be acreened upon 

## receipt . • j



### :. •',



## VES 0 11246\ 

## ·'

I. 

## e ) Hastes whi c h m ee t the criteri a established in secti on 1!1 of thia policy and which eahibited poaitive s cr een r es ult a for dioain precursors during profile appr oval ana lr a i s will be screened upon re c e ipt if the profile approval s c reen indie a ted**o~ n**  

## precuraora above the pre cu rs o r thre abo ld v a lu e , and subsequent dio:dn a nalysis confiraed dioaina below t he dioain tb r eaho ld value (o r not present ). The**inc~ng** 

## a cr een wi ll be limited to only thoae precursors which were detected during pr ofile approval analya i s. If the incOid ng screen indicates the pr esence o f dio a i n precurs o rs , incoming · di o lin confirmation ana l ysis will be conducted if the l evala of pncuraora i n tile inca.ing screen eaceed the l evala of precursors in the profile approval analysis with t he follo vtPv guidelin ea : ·**~** 

## · i ) 

## Pr ofile appr ov a l precursor screen vu p oaitive , dioain confirmation analyais vaa negative , nona detected.

- and
- The incoming screen indicates precursor l evels greater than a factor o f 10 tiMes abo ve the profile appr ova l raaul t a . ii) Pro file appr ov al pr e c11 rsor screen waa positive, dioxin**confi~tion** 

## anahsia vu negative, but dioain v .. detected below thruhol4 value.

- ancl - 

## The inco.ing acraao indicates pre cursor l evels greater than a prorated l aval above the profile approval raaulta . The pr o rated laval i s**de e~ned**  

## aa f ol l o ws : (D TL / DLD) X PPL whe r e :

Di oain Analyaia : DTL • diox i n threahold laval DLD 

# = dioain l evel dete ct ed ( pr ofil e approval ) PPL 

# = pr o file appr oval precuzaor level Dioain analysis wi ll be**perf ~.**  

## with the concurrence o f th e generator of the vaata , foll o wing a dioain precursor a c raan whi c h indicataa a pracuraor praaant at or above 0.01 \ by wei ght. Detection liMit a for dioain

. analrsia wil l be 

## aat at a l part per .tllion tbreaho l d . 

## VES 0 11247

### V. ODIIJ'!IOIIII 

### A.

II .



# c. D. 

# •• Diorio : General hllli l 7 DU\e 

### tor**e~unda** 

### known aa p olrchlorinated**dibenso~p-dioxina** 

### ( PCDDa). Speoifioalll', "dio :r.in " h tnicall7 uaad to refer to 2 , 3,7 , 8- tatr a chlo rodibans o- p ·di o xin , or 2 ,3,7,8-tc DD . Di o zin prequraora : C hemical• which when manufactured have b een shown to contain diodna aa a wuta o r bypr o du ct. Diodn precuuora are of liailar chemical**co itio** **n** 

### to diozina. 

### Sa.e aaa.plea are 

### 2,4,5- triehlorophenol. a il vaz, and huach lo r o phene :**,** 

### . 

### Jill& : H i gh Presaura Liquid c hr-atognphJ . Thb anal71is t echnique il 

### uaed i n CNK 

### method 192
- 78 , "The 

### Analyaia of Ch lorophenozy Berbi ei dea uaiD9 

## KPL C " . , 

# .. ':" . 

## oc, GC/HS: Oaa Chr-tQ9raph.J , GC/IIaaa Spectroacpft . Ana ly aia inatrumentation uaed for the apecitic identification of n_.roua or ganic**e~o 1111da** **.** 

### T7pioal17 , the -thoda for cruutification of apaoific diodna or di o & in pre eu raora uaa 

# oc or 

### OC/MI tachAiqu .. . lWl!!Q""' 

### acrean : A 

### quick , aeai·quutitativa -thod of idantifring the pra . aan c e of a apeo ifi o ehlllical or chllaical faai lJ . speoifieallJ, SW-846 

### Me t hod**~010, I~o••••r**  

### Teat for the Praaen o e of Pentachlorophenol. 1: \ ftiDIOX.ft'r .. . . ...•• "



### j 

## ' 

## i . . i

L · ; · 

## VES01 12 4 8'I POL ICY AE YI EW O f PAO F IL E**OH SHTUi!** **i~** 

## su ap e c t p .,. po l i c y 

## r 

# « --..&....-- > COndli ct . d 1 o xi n precure o r ana l yah Not auipact · p ar p o 1

# t<. v I . 

## 'rcic ee d wfth d ec · f a lon · pro c •••• no pre - curaor ana ly eh**Oio~ in**  

## pr e cur a or a Pre c urs or s not fo u n d 

# I f oun d 

# .- «:- '--- »·- - -- --- -- ---. v 

## Ooes ae n e r eto r wan t to h a v e d i o x in t ee ti n a pe r formed ? No No d iox in t ae tln e



## > 

# vv .. 

# .. 

## Conduct d ioxin ana ly a i e T 

### Wu 

## d io x in de t e c ted ? Y e 

# •**)** 

## >> Dan y d a cilion

Ja v el No prec u raor te1tine o n lncom ln e wae t a

Y

ee Denw dec i a i on 

# or »-**raj~t** ahiJIIM"t

## ~ I 

## v No Y 

## No Appr ov a dec 1 a lon , c ond uct precuraor e na ly a l a on i ncONi n a waste s hi p!lllntl T 

## I a**ne~; ne**  

## waete a hi 11111ent precureor l eve'l 

## > 1 0 

## tl-• t h a prof i le ana l ya i e pre -c uraor leval 'P

## ~ Y a 

# • Oola the 

# ..,._..tor want to 

## have d i o x in teat 

## tne**perfo~? .·**  

## Y

aa Coftduct dio xi n anal y aia I 

# v 

# jw .. dlo;i n det ected ? V No 

# . Acc ept t he waate**ahipr~~~nt**

## ---L---------------**--- ---** **-- ---~**  Appr o ve dechlon (or accept waet e**eh ~ta** **,** 

## c onduct prac uraor anal y 1ia o n l ncoalne wast e**ah ~t•** 



# ---- »----., No 

## Accept the f-. 

## > waet•**1h ~t** 

NO . 

## llejact the ' ) 

### . 

## waeta**ahi~t** 

# < Modify dec f a i on

# ~~~ anal y l t a**reaul ~l**  

## for rat to of pre- . c ureora t o d i o x11'1'; . if 

## neceaaary


# < ' .• 

## • • t h e pra :.. rat.cl i ncoill i nt 

# wuu**ahf ~** **it ~:** **ri ol'**  

### • «ir-*' . l! ' to i d il 

## l i¥ 11 ( 

## f '. JiJM · 

## <

.. •**~He y**  

## I Kt I 

# !Sn: · I . V. .... ,, 

## 2, , • • ti l ? . . ' 

### . .**~** 

### .. 

## . .. ,.


## · No ' 

# v · vw e

· 

# . . 

# .. ...**Ac efj~** **··** 

## waate lhi PIMftt ,.

" · 

### '· 

# I 1 

## ! . '



# l.

VES OI 1249

# VES011250 . pdf

### Ogulei , David From : Sent! 

### To : Subject: Attachments : 

### Da vid, Wa rc hol, De nnis <d e nnis.warchol@veolia .com> Fnday , December 20, 2013 11 :4 0 AM Ogu l ei , David Veo lia' s Was te Analysis Plan Veol1a'sWAP . pdf



### Attached p ursuant 

### to your 

### r.:quest is the 

### curreu t Veolia Waste**Ana ~is**  

### Pl an . Pl ease call if 

### you have any 

### questions.



## VES 011250

# VES011251 . pdf

### Ogu lei , David From : 

### Sen t: To : Cc : Subject: Attac hm ents: Den ni s J Wa rchol <dennis.wa rchol@veo l iaes.com> Wednesday , July 17, 20131 : 53 PM Ogulei, David Nancy L Paddock RE : Trtle V**Perm~** Appfical ion 20 1 307 1 71320 . pdl Attache d is 

### a copy o f Veoli a 's May 31, 2 013 Respo n se a nd associated att ac hm e n ts to the Age n cy' s Noti O cati on of I n co m pl ete nes s let te r . A copy was a l s o sen t o ut to day via F ede ra l EJcp ress P lease call if you have any questions. Thanks From : Ogu le i , David (mallto:Ogu le i.Davi d@epa .gov] 

### Sent Tuesday, July 16, 2013 11:56 AM To : Den ni s J Ward'lo l Cc: Nancy L Paddock; Damico, Genevieve Su bject: RE : Trtle V Permit Applicati on Y

es , th at t ime would wcrk. Genevieve Damico will a lso join us . P lease ca ll u s 

### at 

## (312) 886
- 1304 From: De nni s J Warchol (mao lto:denn i s.warchol @ veo l iaes.oom] 

### Sent Tuesday, July 16 , 2013 11:12 AM To: Ogu l ei, Da 'lid Cc: Nancy L Paddock 

### SubJect : Title 

### V Permit App l ication Davi d, Can we call you at a round 9 AM tomorrow to d iscuss your comments . I will have Nancy Pa ddock on the ca ll who works for me and Kathy Strut berg our consultant who he l p ed us wi t h th i s application. If th at time works , we will call you in your office . Thanks SERVICE FIRST SAFETY ALWAYS Dennis J . Warchol E H S Ma nage r Veolia E S Technica l Solutions, L L. C . Trade waste**nclne ra** **on** Facbity 

### #7 Mobile Avenue Sauget, IL 62201 6 1 8-271-2804 (ext . 169) 6 1 8-271 -2128 (fax) Dennis warchoi@VeollaES . com www . YeohaES com This**e-ma~** message from Veo l fa ES Technical Soluti on s , LLC is for the sole use of**~e** intended recipie n l(s) and may conta i n confident i al and pri'lileged informatio n. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited . I f you are not the intended recip ie nt , please commun i cate with the sender by reply e-mail and des troy all cop ies of the o riginal message and delete I t from al computers .



## VES01125 1

# VES011252.pdf

# G)veOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES May 31 , 2013 Ms . Genevieve Damico Ai r Permits Section USEPA Reg i on 5 77 West J..ckson Blw. Chlc3go, I L 60fi04-3590 Re: Veol i a ES Technical SoiU1ions , LLC Part 71 Renewa l Appllcafton Response to Notification of incompleteness , May 16, 2013 

### Dear Ms. Damico; Veo{la ES Tecll nical Solutions, LL.C. located In Sauget, Ill in o i s (Veolla) received co rrespo ndence from US EPA Region 5 (EPA ) regarding 

### its application tor renewa l o( the facility's Part 71 Perm i t to Operate No . V·IL·12716300 10 3.08-0 1 . The notification o( I ncom pleteness Qsted sll< 

### items tor wh i ch EPA determined that additiona l irlormatlon Is req uired In order to be deemed ocmplete . Veoflll response to these I tems 

### Is presented I n the fdlowing 

### dlscussbl . Since the origina l Part 71 permi t was Issued, SePtember 12 , 2008 , Veolla has not Implemented any operational changes and has not constructed any new equ ipment since the final application I nformation fOf Permit No. V·IL- 12716399193.08-01 

## was submi!Uld a nd reviewed by EPA 

### T\\o new regulations, the Boiler MACT ard RICE MACT , were publis hed since the exlsting permit was Issued and the applicable requ i rements 

### tor these reg ulations have been addressed In the renewa l appllcellon . Based on this an d in the interest of avoilfing <lJpllcation of materials already previously submitted,**Veo .a**  nalied o n cross referenci n g the prellfous application and existing Part 7 1 

### permit 

### to obtain !ntormation required on appWcation forms . Veoia prepared 

### the Part 71 permit renewa l application In this manne r based on guidance conta:ned i n USEPA' s " Federal Opernting Permit Program (40 CFR Part 71 ) INSTRUCTION MANUAL FOR P ART 7 1 FORMS" . 

### Excerpt from 

### lll$truclion Manual : Cross-Referendng ofInformation Already ProvidedAllowed If

### you nave previously submitted Information to 

### t=PA or to an approved State 

### agenc:1 that is 

### required to 

### be submitted in these application forms , you may eithe r repeal the informslion 

### in the 

### space provided 

### or cross- reference the 

### relevant materials or documents. Cross-referencing is allowe.d for materials that 

### ere currertly applicable and avaRabJe to the public 

### and the permitting authority. 

### If the meteiiBis do 

## not meet this siandllfd they must be 

### submitted as en litachment {o 

### tfJe form. A/1 crostMeferenc&d materials will be placed 

### in the public docket on the permh action, 

### uriess they are published and/or readily avaHable. The detailed**~onse** to each item In EPA's llCltificatlon I s prov1ded in the cfJSCUSson below . ITEM 1: CITATION AND DESCRIPTION OF ALL APPUCABLE REQUIREMENTS . As stated above and In ltoe permit renewal appl ication narrative , t here have been no physical changes to ex!smg em i sso n units , no new construc:tion of em i ssion**un~** and no change to 1he operation of existing emission un its since the submitta l and review by EPA ol 

### the permit appllcalion 

### to· the existing Permit 

### No .**V~L -1** **271 6399** **93.08-01.** There are 

### two new regulations that we re pu b l ished that 

### affe<:t the Veolia fdty as touo· NS: 17 Mobile Av.nue. Sauget, IL 62201 ( IU ) 211-78().1 www . veoll-. .cotn 

## VESOll252

## . .... .**.~~** 

# ...**·- ·** 

### ...

## · ..... . . ··

.. 

# G)veouA ENVIRONMEI'ITAL SERVICES 

### • 40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDOD National 

### Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

### Pollutants for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and 

### Institut ional Boilm 

### and 

### Process 

### Heaters. • 40 CFR 63 SUbpart ZZZZ National Emisston Standards for HaurdotJs AJr Polluiants 

### for Stationaty Rec i procati ng In tern al Comb u stio n Engines. The new appficable r equi rements that will apply or have become effective during the term of the**perm~** are described in Section III.A en d llt.D of the renewa l application. Also i ncluded are tile effectiVe d ates of these regulation!. VeoHa Will be in compliance with an applicab l e requ irem ents as ollha effectiVe date of each rule . All othe r applicable req uirements are listed I n the existing Part 7 1**perm ~**  refe renced above and In the appfocation as in:flcated below . Veolia , therefore, refers EPA to Secllon I V of the May 2007 app l ication narrative in which appicable requ i rements are descrtled in detail and Section VI In which oompliance demonstration methods a re described I n d etail. In add itio n, Sectio n s 2 . 1 , 2 .2. 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6 , 2. 7 an d 2 . 8 of lhe existirg 

### Prut 71 permit lo r the translation of the applicable requirements contalned in the May 2007 ap plication inlo permit conditions. ITEM 2 : INITIAl C OMPLIANCE PLAN AND CERTIFICATION . Veolia refers EPA to the FOR M I-COMP that was provided 

### in Sectio n I oflhe appica Uon submitted May 2007 including a Compl i ance Slaws Ta b le entided 'Addendum to Section 1: Form 1 -comp". Form 1- . COMP 

### references Section IV of the appiic&Uon n a rrative in which appl i cab le requflements are descriled i n deta i l a . nd Sect ion VI 

### rn which compjiance demonstration methods ate described In detail. The compli a nce status t o r each t.nlq ue co mbination of awl icable req u lremenls I s lndicE.ted In the Compliance Statlls Table rEierenced above. There are no applicable requireme n ts lo r whlcb the source in not in oompliance, therefore , no compliance plan/schedule Is required . ITEM 3 : DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION OF EMISSIONS ESTIMATION METHODS. Veolla refers EPA to S ection V of tne May 2007 application for**d~u aal** **on** and ju3tifi ca" on of emiss ion factors , maximum hourly design rates an d maximum hourly emission rates with the exception o f the d rum crusher . Polential 1o emil 

### rares provided 

### rn the EMISS 

### forms and the 

### PTE lcnns are 

### based on a comb ination of conslrucUon permit l imi ts , 40 CFR 63 S ub part EEE limits and maximum design rate calcu l ation s as provided i n Section V.C of the May 2007 application. A ll of these ! mas a l so appear i n th e existing Part 71 permit. The drum crusher em ission f actor 

### and e missi on estimates were re -eva lu ated 

### as part of the re newal applieation . The revised emlssion factor and I ts basis are provided In Section lfi .C and Appendix A of the renewal permft app l icatio n. In addition , dumg preparation of this response , sevel'll l typographical errors were found o n the emission calculation forms. Revised forms are Included with thiS documenl ITEM 4 : L ISTING OF ALL ACTIVE AIR PERMrTS AND CONSENT ORDERS ISSUED BY STATE OR FEDERAl AGENCY. Veolia refers EPA lo Section lA of the May 2007 applica tion lor the permit history of the f aclll t y. The Part 71 permft is the on ly one Hsted in 

### Section K of the FORM GIS because the existing Part 7 1**perm~** oontai n s all fedei'olly e nforceable app l icable requirements from the construction permits Issued by the Illinois Departmen t of the Environment (!E P A). There have bee n n o construction permits i ssued since the Part 71 permit 

### was Issued and no Part 71 permit modificafions have OCCUlTed. 1 7 MobMo AvonUI, Sauget IL U201 (611) Z71-2 10' www.wofiMt.ccm 

## VES011253

# G)veouA !;NVIRO NM E NTAL SERV ICES ITEM 5: PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAMS AND FACILITY PLOT PLAN . Veo r ta refers EPA 

### to S e cflon Ill behi nd the**F~gure** tab I n !he Ma y 2007 appllcalion for labeled s ite layou ts and process 

### flow diograms. T here have bee n no c hanges to the diagrams . ITEM 6: USTING AND DESCRIPTION OF INAPPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS. VeoUa refers EPA 

### to Appendi x B of th e May 2007**p~ ation**  lo r ltlls l r sttn g . CERTIFICATlON In accordance 'Aith 40 CFR 7 1 . 5(d) , the f oUowlng certiflcation Is provided regard ing the content or th is docum e nt and h s at!3c hme nts . l ce rtify u nde r penahy of law ltlat, based 0<1 infonn a!ion and beli ef fonned after reasonable i nqully , lhe statements and in formation containe d i n this docurrent an d I ts attachments are t rue , accurate and complete. AuthoriZed Signature 

### N ame (sig ned ) : Name (typed) : Doug l as Harris 

### Titl e : General Manag er

, Mobile Avenue. Sauget. IL 12201 (618) 2.11·2804 www.¥e0111es com 

# . 

# r

VES 0 112 5 4

### ft**EA~ Uni** **ed** States !W!:**Envi o~men** **ai iPro** **oct on** 

# ~7 A gency O MB N o. 2060-0336 APProval Expi r es 06/30/20 1 5 

### Federal Operating Permit Program (40 CFR Part 71) PO TENTI A L T O EM IT 

### IPTE} Fo r each 

### unit with emissions that count towards appli ca b i lity, l i st the e missions u nit ID and the PTE fo r the a ir poll uta nts l isted be low and sum them up t o show t otals fo r lhe fa cility . You m ay flnd i t he l p ful to compl e te form EM ISS b efore completing th is form . Show o th e r pollutants not listed that a re present i n major amo unts at tile f aci li ty on attachment in a sim ilar fas hion. You may round ' lal ues to the nea rest l e nth of a ton . Also reoo rt f aci l itv totals In sec ti on 

### J of fo rm GIS . Regu lated Air Po llutants and Po lluta nts f or whlth the Source 

### is Maj or E missi ons Unit 10 (tonsfyr) NOx VOC S02 PM10 

# co Lead HAP UN I TI2 4 . 0 0 . 9 7 . 7 2 . 80 6 , 6 0 .0221 1 1. !1§ UN IT f3 4.0 0 . 9 7.7 2 . 91 6 .6**~** 10. 40 U N I T#4 61 . 6 3. t**~.76** 8 . 82 13.88 0 . 0895**11 ~**  LABPACK REPA CK 1.45 0.24 1 8 MP- 1 0 .2387 0 . 0495 MP -2 0 . 2387 0 . 04 95 DRUM CRUSHER 3 . 87 0 . 248 TANK 112 0 . 1348 0.0002 TANK #4 0.0203 3.65 

## x to" TANK #6 0 . 0133 2.40 X 

## til'"

E P A Fo rm 59 00-85 

## VES011255Em i ssions U nit 10

T

ANKII!8 T

ANK #10 TANK#2 0**TA NK** **~O** TANK#40 TANK 

### ISO TANK #GO T ANK#300 TANKI302 TANK#304**AN K~** **06** TA N K #308 TANK #310 TANK#312 TANKI3 14



### EPA Form 5900-85 

## ......... . ' ' 

## ··-- Regu lated Air Po!Jutants and P oll utan ts for wh ich 

### the Sou rce i s Major (tonslyr) NOx 

## voc $02 PM10 

## co 0 . 0256 0. 0125 0.0460 0.0203 0 . 0143 0 . 0085 0 . 0257 0.1454 0.4:C24 0.3094

1 . 29 1 . 62 2 . 1 8 3 .23 0.4738 Lead HAP 4.61 X 10" 6**.2~** X 10-<

0.0001 3 .6 5 X 10.s 2 . 58 X 1 <f 1.53 X 10 .. 4 . 62 X 1<f

0.0003 0 . 0008 0.0006 0.0023 0.0029 0.0039 0 . 0058 0 .0009 

## • i 

# I I 

# I. '



## VES011256' " .. . . · , 

## . . " 

## .. · 

# . . · . .
Regul ated A i r Pollutants and Pollutants for 

### which the Source is M ajor Emissions Unit JO (to ns lyr) N O x 

## voc S0 2 P M 10 

## co Lead HAP B F BLDG 2 . 56 0 .0 1 88 B Ol LER tl1 4 . 51 0 . 248 0.027 0 . 34 3 3 . 79 FUGITIV E EQUIP lEAKS 0.0390 0 . 00 14**~ ~** **~** 0 . 03**~** 

### !l.QS Q,2 

### .Q..QQQ.1 EGEN2 0 .4 2**~ ~** **~ ~**  

### M Q.QQQ1

FACIILTY TOTALS**74 ~**  23 . §2 §§.Z,§**14.~** 

### 1! .Q**0.~** 33 . §i



### E PA Fo rm 5 9 00. 85 

## V ES 0 11257

### ~ Er.vlronmental Pro t eotiM 

## ! · ft**EA~** U n ite d S ta t es · 

# 'i:,... Agency OMB No . 206()..0336 . Approval Expires 06/3012015 Federa l Operating Permi t Program 

### (40 CFR Part 

### 71) EMISSION CALCULAT I ONS IEMISSI Calcu l a te potentia l to emit (PTE) for appl icability purposes and actual emissions for 

### fee purposes for each emiss i ons unit , control device , or**emative** operating scenari o I dentified in section I of form G IS . If f o rm F E E does not need t o be submitted 

### with the app lication, do not ca l cu l ate**a~Jal** emissions. A. E mis si ons U n lt iD**Un~** #2 B . Id e ntifi c ation and Qu a ntific ati o n of Em i ssi o ns Fi rst, ils t each air pollutan t that is either regulated at the unit or present in major arrounts, 

### then li st any other regulated pollutant (for f ee ca lc ulation) not already li sted. HAP may 

### be s i mply l isted as "HAP." Next , calculate PTE for appicabnity purposes and actua l emissions for fee purposes for each pollutant Do n ot cal c ulat e PTE f or a i r pollu tants listed sol el y for fee purposes. I nclude a ll fug itives for fee purposes . You 

### may round to the nearest ie n th of a ton for ye811yvalues or tenth of a pound for hour ly values . Emission Rates Actu al Poten tia l to EmK Annual**~r** PoUutants E miSsions Hour1y Annual CAS No . (lonslyr) Qblhr) (t onslyr) 

## co 2.55 6 .6 VOM 8 . 0 0 .9 NOx 

### 3.26 4 . 0 PM 2 . 6 0.1405 0.6156 PM 10 

### 0.6388 2 . 6 Part 0 . 6388 2 .8 

### sox 1. 21 7 .7 

### HCV CI

2 

### 2 . 19 9 . 92

EPA F o rm 

### 5900- 84 

## VES011258I •**~** 

### . .

Emission Rates Actual Po tentia l to Emtt Annua l Air Po llu ta nts Em iss ions Hou rly An nu a l C AS N o . (to nstyr ) ( lblhr ) (tonstyr) Hg 0.0028 0 . 0125**743&-97~** As 0 . 0020 O . UOB8 744 0 · 36· 2 

### Be 0 . 0020 0 . 0088 7 <14041-7 Cd 0 . 0050 0.0221 7440·43·9 

### cr 0.002 0 0 . 0088 74404 7·3 

### Sb 0.0020 0.0088 7440-31 · 5 Pb 0 . 0050 0 . 0221 743 9-9 2-1 Nl 0 . 002 0 0.0088 7440-02 -Q Dioxln/F u ran 4 . 38 x 10 .. 1 . 92 X 

### 10" 8



### EPA F orm 5900-84 

## VESOI1259

### ' 

# . . . •: 

### .. . .. : .... . 

# n**EA~** Unit ed States**~** .**E~vironm enta** **l** P r ot 4ction

## ~~ Agency 

### OMB No . 206()..()336 Apll[oval Expires 0613012015

Fede ral Operating Permit Program (40 CFR Part 71) EM I S SIO N C A L CU LAT I O N S ( EM IS S ) Calcu la te potentia l to emit (PTE) for applicability purposes and actua l emissions fo r fee purposes f or each emiss i ons un it . control device, or a l tern a ti ve**opera~ng** scenario identified in**s~on** I of form GIS . If form FEE doc<: not ne<od to be**ubrn~ted** with 

### the appl ication . do no t calculate actual emissions. A. Emi s sio n s U n i t 10 Unit #3 

### B. ldentl f l ca tlon an d Q u an tifica tion of E m i ssi o n s First, li st each a i r po ll;tant that i s eithe< regulated at the unit or present in mafor arrounts, the n list an y other reg ulated pollutant (for 

### tee ca lcul ation) not already listed. HAP may be simply listed as "HAP ." 

### Next , calcu l ate 

### PTE fOf applicab il i ty purposes and actua l em i ssions for fee purposes for each pollutant. Do not ca l culate PT E f or a i r po ll utants listed so lely for fee purposes . lndude all fugitives for fee p urposes . You m ay round to the nearest te nth 

### of a ton for yearly values or ten th o f a pound for hourly 

### values. Em ission Rates Actual Potential to Emit Annual Air Po l lutants Emissions Ho u r1y Annua l CAS No . (tonsfyr) (lblhr) (lons/yr) 

## co 2.65 6.6 VOM 8 .0 0 . 9 NOx 3.26 4 . 0 PM2 . 5 0 . 1462 0.6404 PM10 0.6646 2. 91 Part 0 . 6646 2.91 

## sox 1. 21 

### 7.7 HCVC12 2 .22 10.03



### E PA Form 5900-84 

# I

VES0 11260Actual Mnual Air Ponutanls Emisslons (tonslyr) Hg As Be Cd C r Sb Pb Ni Dioxl n/Furan



### EPA Form 5900-84 Em i ssion Rates Pote n tia l to**Em ~** 

Hourly (lb/hr ) 0 .0029 0 . 0021 0 .0021 0.0052 0.002 1 0.002 1 0 . 0 052 0.0021**~x10'~** Annual (tonslyr)

0.0 130 0 . 0092 0.0092 0 . 0229 0 . 0092 0 . 0092 0 . 0229 0.0092 1 . 20x 10'7 CAS N o. 74 39- 97 -0**7440 ·3~·** **2** 7

440-41 - 7 7440-43- 9 7440.47-3 744 0 -3 1 -5 74 39- 92·1 7

440-02-0

j I

# I I VES011261

## ' . ft

### EA~ Un i t ed Stat e s :w.! 

### Envi r onMo ntal Pr otection

## ~i' A g ency OMB No . 2060-0336, Approva l Expires 06130/2015 Fed eral 

### Operating Permit Progra m 

### (4 0 CFR Part 

### 71) EMISS I ON CALCULATIONS ( EM I SS) Ca lc ul ate poten ti a l to emit (PTE) for appii ca bilit'/ purposes a n d actual emissions fo r fee purposes for each emissions u n it , contro l device , or alternative operating sce nario i dentified in section I of fo rm GIS . If f orm FI!E doe3 not need t o be • ubmitted with 

### the 8Piliication , do not ca l cuate actual em i ssions . 

### A . Emissions Unit 1 0 Un it 

### #4 B. Identifica tion and Quantification of Emissions First . l i st each air pollutant that I s either reg ul ated at the uni t or p resent i n maj or amounts, then list 

### a ny other regu l ated po llutant (f or fee calculation) not a lready fisted . HAP may be simply listed as "HAP . " Next, calculate PT E for applicability purposes and ac tua l emiss i o ns for fee purpose s for each po ll utant. Do not calculate PTE for a ir po llutants listed so l ely fo r fee p u rposes . Includ e all 

### fug i tives tor fee purposes . 

### You may round to the nearest 

### ten th of a ton fo r ye arty values or tenth of a pound fo r hourly**~a ues.**  Emission Rates Adual Pote ntial to Emit An nu a l A ir Poftula n ls Emissions Hourly A n n ual CAS No. (ton s/Yr) (lblhr) 

### (t on styr ) 

## co 8.03 13.86 

### VOM 8 3. 1 NOx 14.61 61 . 6 PM2.5 0 .4432 1 . 94 PM1 0 2. 01 

### Ul Part 2.01**~** SOx 4 .23 50 . 76 HC I/CI2 2 . 36 1 0.40



### EPA Form 5900· 84 

# . 

# I i:

I I.



## VES011262.. . fi .. • .... ... • • . •

Emission Rates Actua l Potentia l to Emit An n ual AJr Poll uta nts Emissions Hou rly Annua l CAS No . (to n slyr) ( lblh r) ( lons/yr) Hg 0 . 0 090 0.0393 7 439-97 -6 A:s 0 . 00&4 0 . 0278 7 44D-38·2 Be 0 . 00&4 0 . 0 2 78 7 ' 40-41
-7 C d 0.0159 0. 0695 744()..43-9 Cr 0 . 00&4 0 . 0278 7 440 -4 7- 3 Sb 0.0064 0 .0278 7440.3 1- 5 Pb 0 . 0 1 59 0 . 0695 ?439- 9 2· 1 N l 0.0064 0 . 0 278 7440.02-0 Dloxin/Furan**5~** l< 10'l**.~** l< 10'!



### E PA Form 5900 - 8 4 

## VES 0 ll263

# VES011264 . pdf

### O g ulei, Dav id From : Krag 

### Petterson <kragP@cooper envlronmental.com> Wednesday , July 17,2013 5 : 32PM Sent: To : Ojjulei, David Cc: andreag@cooperenvironmenta l. com ; 'J ohn**Coope~** 

### Attachments : Pall Comments on the Secondary L e ad Smelter MACT Rul e.pdf, Method 30 1 

### Report. pdf; Yanca-2006.pdf ; EP·D-07-026 F inal Report and Appendix A . pdt Xact625 ETV Report . pdt, xcem . pdf ; Feasi bil

ity of usi ng the 

### Xact Multi-metals CEM S as a 

### Mercury Monl iOr on Coal F ired Power Plants. pdf M r . 

### Ogulei. An d rea as ked me to provi de you wit h so me responses to the questions you sent to her i n your email dated June 21 , 2013. 

### My responses to each 

### question are gi ven in r ed . In ad di t io n I have attached seve ral f ile s in re sponse to these questi on s 

### as well. tam particula r ly intere sted i n rece iv ing a n upda te on t he f o llowi ng areas: 1. 

### Commercial availabili ty of the Xact mul ti-meta ls CEMS . The Xact 

### CEMS is available commercially from Cooper Envi ronmental Services, ll( 

### (CES) Pall COrpomion discont o nued its locense i n ear l y February of this year ind**~lnce** 

### thit time CES has IM!en marketing and manufacturing both 

### the Xact 625 

### and Xact 640 

### and 645 

### (CEMS models) . Xact 640 

### ! Multi
- Meta ls CEMS)- All CEMS sales have been In the United States . Ell Ully -1 

### unn US Army- 3 urits CES- This demJnstratron unot has been used 

### for teslifl!l sponsored by varoous oreaniz:alions including U . S. EPA. 

### Electric Power**~esearch** 

### Institute (EPRI) 

### and Ell 

### lilly . X



### act 620/625 

### Korea- 6 

### units purchased by Natoonallnstitute of EnVIronmental Research 

### China- 9 

### unru purchased by various Environmenta l Monitoring Centers C anada- 6 unts Ontario Mu·u.stry of Envtronm,.nt. Environment**Canada ~**  Quebec Ministry of Environment, 

### Unive r sity of Toronto, University of Dalhousie, and 

### a smelting fac iltty New Zealand- 1 

### unit- secondiry lead smelter AustrJIIa 1 

### unk
- Queensland EPA United States 3 

### units- U . 

### Mass . , Mossourl DEO. U.S . EPA We have known compet ition for the ambient marlet in China from FPI a nd styray 

### (both Chi nese comPinies) . We have a lso heard that FPI pnoduces a multl · metals CEMS but cannot confirm thos . We have no known competitoon outsode of China . 2 . Applicab i li ty/l ea sibility/ r e li

ab i hty o f the Xact multi
-metals CEMS for measu ri ng emissions from heterogeneous 

### waste streami . The Xact and the filter cheodstry**utili~ed** 

### by the Xact have**de~onstrated** 

### the ability to make measurements in wide variety of stack conditions. Testing with the Xact and its filter cheaist r y has o c curred on stacks burning many different fuel types**~ncluding** 

### coal (sub·bit, lignite and bit uninous), natural gas, and diesel fuel and testing has occurred at facilities with different pollution controls like ESP ' s , baghouses, and wet scrubbers. The xact has been tested on facilities with stack**temperatu~s** 

### ranging 

### from 

## lee to 459**degr~es** 

### Fahrenheit and ranging in -oisture content up to at least 20%. In addition the Xact has demonstrated



## VES 0 11264

### accuracy i n the presence of a wide range chemi c al species likely to be 

### present 1 n stack effluent. one of the strengths of the**~act** 

### is that the saaple collection is separated fraN the x - ray analysis. This 

### eears that the .are sensitive components of the analysis system 

### are never exposed to stack effluent. In addition because the Xact coll ects a saople for a defined lenath of time (for example 15 minutes) this**~ans** 

### that the filter trapping chemistry is refreshed with every sample eliminating the problems with the chemistry becooing spent over ti.e. Also the Xact employs sample dilution prior to the filter trapping allowing many of the stack gas components and the dew point to be diluted to their optimal ranges. Finally, we woul1 reca.eend**dyn~c** 

### spiking procedures in performing RATA · s, siailar to those used by Eli Lilly in their Alternative**~nitorin&** 

### petition. Dynamic spiking allows the Xact to be 

### challenged by 

### a known concentration of metals in the preseuce of potentially interfering cooq>onents from the stack gas. I've attached two files with details on the range of stack conditions over which the Xact has been tested . 1) Method 381 Roport.pdf
- please see section 7 2) Pall comment; on the Secondary Lead Smelter MACT Rule.pdf
- these give additional details on places the Xact has been testad. 3 . Case s tudi es documenting application and/or deployment of the Xact multl · metas CEMS . Please 

### see the files above . In addition I would add the following documents losted be ow . 1) Yanca-2006 ·Paper published in the Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association documenting the Method 301 validation of the 

### ><act . 2) EP·D-07-026 Ftnal report and Appendix A . pdf
- paper documenting the X act's performance during an EPA sponsored Small Business Innovative Research grant. The RATA procedures used at Ell Ully were performed on a coa l fired s ou rce. 3) X act 625 ETV Report.pdf- this was study was done on an ambient un it biA: 

### demonstrates the accuracy or the technclogy 4) Xcem.pdf- an Army Corps of Engineers study of the Xact's performance on Army's hazardous waste tnctneratuos. 5) Feasibility ofustng the 

### ><act Multi·metals CEMS as a Mercury Monitor on Coal**~t red**  

### Pow"' Plants . pdfpresentation given at the EUEC conference in 2011 and documents our comparison with Method 308 for mercury. 4 list o f loca lions/facllr ties where the X act multi-metals C£MS is currently deployed and operating for any reason . l"ve hsted the IGcifrtres were the Xact CEMS was deployed 1 Eli lily's Tippecanoe Laboratories. Lafayette IN- Deployed and operated for 6 years . The facility is under new ownershtp and the Xact Is no longer operated 2 . U.S . '-rmv- Tooele UT munrtions test furnace -It operated periodically at this facility as the u . s. Army tested procedures for burning different types of munitions . 3 U . S . Army- Tooele . UT productton furnace. The Xact was I nstalled 

### at this f;ocllrty but was never opetated because resutatrons were newr requlred for it. 4 . U.S.IIrmy- Crane, IN product ron furnace. The X act was Installed at this faci li ty 

### but was never operated because regulati ons were never required for rt. 5. How beryfli Lm emissions are ty pi ca ll y handle d given t hat the X act mufti · metafs C£MS cannot quantrfy beryllium.

2 

## V E SOL126 :Eli lilly was only**~rent** thllt utilized the Xact CEMS for com ph; nee purposes it handled the beryll1um Issue as follows (quoted f•o m Wly' s AMP) ·eecause the XACT Is mcapabfe of measurmg bery11ium (Be) , Uly has developed a defaull value lor beryllium em1ss io ns Fommalely . bel)llium is a scarce element thai is not used in Lilly pharmaceuucar manulactunng processes lilly has examined all lis manufacturing processes and associated proceu construction malenals (t g alloy sleets) and found no lndica1100 ll1al bel")llrum 5ho\lld be present. Therefore , Ully**be~eve s**  that a conservallvely calculated**defau~** value for beryllium is technically d6fenslbte Trace levels of beryllium 

### are possible in raw materials and ground water . Uly has sampled b liquid wast• and found only sporad ic ·hits· of beryllium at levels cl068 to the deJection Umils . Ully has also done some UmHed samplmg of plant trash. some of which might be processed In the solid-liquid inci nerator, and some low-levels of**bet~lrum** were repo<ted . For ll1e purposes of catcuJaung a conservabw defaun -.ssoo concentration . Ully has assumed llwl all liquid and solid wastes fed to the SOiidollquiCIIncl•.,.-ator conttlln Boat thP. maxlmum levels detected : 1 . 0 ppm in the solid Wll$le and O . Otppm In lhe liquid wastes. The defaun em1ssioo concentrabon was than calallale<l usmg tha ma•imum waato food ra'-• from the CPT plan , and an l VM system removal efficiency (SRE) of 98% (which is a factor of two less than the design SRE of 99% and a factor of 20 tess then the SRE of 99 . 9% obtained during the CPT of anotller lilly Incinerator with a virtually idenhcel scrubber system) . The resullmg value was JUSt over 1 ug/dscm. To be mora conselllallve . Ully has chosen 2 ugldscm as a default va l ue Therefore a value of 2 ug/dscm wil l be added to the measured LVM em1ssron before oomparisOn to the emission standard hmrt . It the CPT data or any other evidence indlcal.slhe defau" value Is not appropriate. it will be adJusted aerordmgly • 6 . Est1 m ated time ine for deployme nt of the Xact multi - metals CEMS a t an existing h clli t y, I e . , fro m order date to operat1on . WhJt are the pot ential ' h alle nges? We be heve that a 9 month time line b suffiCient and includes manufacturing. shipping Installation an d RATA testing . Krag Pette 11 on Vlce Pres i dent Cooper Environmenta l S ervices , LLC 10180 SW N im b us Ave Ste . J6 Portland, OR 97223 503 -670.. 8 33 5

) 

## VES01126

# VES011267 . pdf

# Using the XactTM Multi-Metals CEMS as a Mercury Monitor on a Coal-Fired**,'/ ..-o**  llk!JI•....,... 

# Power Plant: A Feasibility Study

liiiia I 

## !'-**~** 

## ·- I



## - 

# ..

CES 

# I I-

• •• 

# Krag**etterson,** 

# John A. Cooper,**Pittenger,** 

# Mike Nakinishi Cooper Environmental Serv ices, LLC Joe Doherty, Marty Ladner ; Pall Corporation

Cooper Environmental Services 

# V ES0 11 267

# Executive Summary • Review of X actTM Design and Operation • GQals 

# of Feasibility 

# Study • Results of Laboratory Phase of Study • Field Deployment and Performance Test

Cooper Environmental Services 

## 2 

## VE S 011 268

# The XactTM Multi-Metal CEMS

• 

# X

.wt... C E S 

# --· 

# , -

••• 

# • Developed by Cooper Environmental Services (CES) •**Devel~** 

# as a MuJt1-Metals CEMS • Based on

# X-~~ Flourescence Analysis (XRF) • Beta -gauge type reel-to-reel tape drive and sampling techno logy • Can measure up to 20 metals simultaneously including Cr, 

# As, Cd, Hg , and Pb

Co o per Environmental Services 

## 3 

# VES011269

# X act M t-4• 1• M on i \or 

# • 

# XactTM-CEMS Connect to Probe and**~Transport** 

# Line 

# l Main Flow From Stack Sampling and Ell 60 

# to 800 Lpm Analysis Module

T- Drive I ' 

# ll .elo. 1

& XRF 

# - DopenV OlluiiOn 

# - Sub sample onto ce s

• 

# • 

# L

Flow 

# - ::::: 

## ' I

Cooper Environmental Services 

# I 1 

# Control

l=l

# ==**~*****dule** C<lnVd 

# - •

4 

# VESOJ 12 70

# en 

# - en 

# >- ...1 

# <( 

# z <( 

# c z <( (!) 

# z 

# - ...1 

# 0... 

# :E <( 

# en :EI# I

# 0

# ~ - r-- N 

# - - C> (/) 

# s:N

### rN



### ...... 

## ...... 0

# ~ 

# c 0 

# ·- 

# .. ca 

# .. .. c G» 

# u c 0 

# u**~**

# ~ 

# . E 

# u Q) (i) 

# - ca J9 c: 

# .. Q) 

## E 

# en c: 

# , g



# -- II ::.. 

# 0 Jj



# ... Q) 

# c g. 0 

### 0 

# 0 

# ·

- 

# .. ca c 

# · - E 

# .. G» 

# .. G» Q

# EPA Method 301 Validated for

Multi-Metals EPA Site Certified 

# XactTM CEMS

May 2007 - EPA Clean Air Excellence Award AMP EPA Approved 

# -6 Years OnStack Operations on Hazardous Waste Incinerator

7 

## VES011 2 7 3

# Key Goals of Feasibility Study • Demonstrate Xact Operation on a Coal Fired Power Plant • C an the Xact Meet the Mercury Mon1 ing (PS-12A) Requirements for Initial Certification Sp ified by 

# the Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR)?

C

ooper En v ironm en tal Servic es 

## 8 VES011274

# PS - 12A Initial Certification Requirements (2007) Current PS 12A R e quire ments Are In Red Tes t 7- Day Ca libration 

# Check 

# R e q ui red F r e quency

1 x 

# p er day • 

# for seven • days 

# Req u ire d S tandard s Zero Upsca l e Linearity Once 

# H go Standard at C h eck ' Lo w, Mid and Measureme ritl igh Span Values / Error 3 -Leve l Once System I ntegrity

C hec k Once • 

# • HgCl2 

# Standard

Low , Mid , High Span Valu es

Ontario H y dro Method 30B (Sorbent Trap) 

# Passin g C r iteri a 5% of H g Span Va l ue

- ORLe ss th an 1 

# !lg / m3 

# d ifference**of** 

## r eferetree ·;sa l t!e 

# 5 % -OR
- 

# Span Value L ess th an l 

# !lg / m 3 

# differ e nc e**of** 

# Span Value 

# 10% of Span Value 20% of R efe rence Method



# - OR Less than 

# 1**~l g/m** **3** 

# differen ce R

e lative Accuracy Test (RATA) Cooper Environmental Services 

## 9 VES011275

# HgCI 2 

# and Hg 0 

# Generator • XactTM did not hav e a HgCl 2 

# or Hg 0 

# Generator • Use d Commercially Available Hova • HovaCalTM operates by 

# evaporating a**so ~**  

# ofHgC1 2 

# on a heated surface 

# " • H gC 1 2 

# Solution of known concentration was metered at a measured flow rate into a measured air flow • H g 0 

# is generated by 

# chemically converting the HgC1 2 

# to e l en1ental Hg (Hova Mere)

Cooper Environmental Se . rvices 

## 1 0 

## VES011276

# Initial Laboratory Tests - XactTM Calibration • XRF Portion of the Xact Calibrated Using 

# Thin Film

# stan**~tBc t**  

# Mercury Cal· ation is •

# Th**es ca** **QQ.i~ ~ifM'i~"~i**  . 

# · crJWXRF e quipm etif**le naf~** **is ~t~M** **en** If 

# ers**p**

# A IO 3 . 3) 

# the**gCI ~n(_t** **9°** 

# Generator •**~~** 

# +" C**~a** ' o o '· '' 

# teference Flow M eter I 

# • C a l ibrat ion 

# f . mg 

# Qu a ntitative 

# • QAG Audit ! \pproved Alte m a li ve Monitori ng Petitio n

C

o oper Environmental Services 

### II 

## VES011277

# Initial L· aboratory Tests With HovaCalTM HgCI 2 

# Linearity Nomi n al Average Percent P ass Tes t Concentration Co nce ntr ation Differenc e (% 

## o f Crite ri a? Level (mg/m 3 ) 

## # of Sampl es S pan ) 

## Zero (01 Water) 0 6 0.40% Yes 

## Low 2 

# 8 -2.37% Yes 

## Low M i d 4 6 -0.6 9% 

## Yes H igh Mid I I 

## 6 -4.10% Yes Hi g h 1 8 

## 8
- 4 .17% Yes 

# Also Passed Current 12A Criteria

Cooper Environmental Services 

# l 2 VES011278

# Initial Laboratory Tests with HovaCalTM Elemental Hg L . inearity

Nominal Average P erce nt

# Xact**MAt** 

# Allrs r .esf U :PS !,2Jlia? Criteria During 7 

# Laboratory Yes 

# E Va luation Hi g h 1 8 

## 6 8 8 . 69 % 0.4 5% 

# With New PS12A Criteria Nomi n a l Co ncentration Concentration Average P e rc e nt Difference 

## (% of Yes Yes

Leve l { mg/m3 ) 

## # of Samples Span) Pa ss T e st Criteria?

Low 

## 4 

## 7 0.57 % Yes 

## M id I I 

## 6 4.4 6% Yes 

## H

igh 18 8 

## 0.45 % Yes Cooper Environmental Services 

## 1 3 

## VES011279

# Field Deployment • XactTM install e d at POE 's Boardman Facility • 585 MW Facility , ESP Controls 

# • Lab XRF Calibration U se d
- Not Recali • Insta1le d and operating within 2 day s • Side by side cotnparison with Thermo M e rcury Freedom Unit • Two week fi e ld depl oyn1ent • P er formed initial performance s p ec ification including: ed in Field

- 7 Day Calibration Check
- Linearity Check

- Sy s ten1 Inte g rity Check
- RATA
- Method 30B Cooper Environmental Services 

## 14 

## VES011280

# Field Test Arrangement

e ......**~ CT!-o** **•~ "**  th. • 1t IVtCI .. \"" 1**~**....... ;"••tllo"" "''"'J:lo\1 ..... .. 

# ""·"·'"

..**fiN'i UI** **~III' t** **~F**

# '"'\'~ J.



## ------- M

J:M**,.....,.,..,~** 

# j ..._ '"·' 1"

# -~-f 1 ._



# ___ ,...,.

l'""F 

## :'.1 

# p**~ •.....:..C~**  _,

### ~ 

## t- ..........,, .. .,_ t.o 

# ' 

# ....

# ~

. \;

# ~J**.** n 

# I!L

_ 11**~** 

# .**..,~.,**

# ... ""''' lloN"O!'I! ' I



# -, I I '-- 

## b 

# ' tj 

# D t-'l)f**~-** Xtllol**ti~100(1'0W** (ti:...toe>"i'l ·I 

# I**:S I~** **f** Sa!f • ll l \l ./

# (~**(~** ....--J ,< 

# • X act 

# D

. b:)' 0 ........ 

### c• 

## "'"'.,..,....

# ... STAC K GAS 

### '-:- 0 0 

# "' 0 

# "''*'"' l "' 0 

### .... , .. &., 0 0 

# u \.. 

# u L Cooper Environmental Services 

## 15 

## VESOII28 1

# Seven Day Drift Test Results Zero Drift R es u l ts U psca l e D r i ft Results CAM R N u m ber CAM R N u mber Ave R u l e M et o f P o i n t s Ave Ru le M e t of Po i n ts D i ffere n ce on CAMR Difference on CA M R Date ( % o f Spa n) Average Rul e Met ( % of Sp an) Average Ru l e M et 

## 3

/ 23/ 2009 0 . 00 

# Ye s 9 11.34 \o 

## 0 3/24 / 2009 0.00 

# Y es 9 6 . 7 1 

# N o 1 3/ 25/ 2009 5 

## 0 . 00 

# Y e s 9 

## -6 . 06 \o 

## 3 3/ 2 6/ 200 9 0 .00 

# Ye s 9 11. 4 7 \o 

## 0 3

/ 2 7 / 2009 0 . 00 

# Ye s 9 

## 2 . 80 

# Yes 8 

## 3/ 2 8/ 2009 0 .33 

# Y es 9 2 . 14 

# Yes 8 

## 3/ 29/ 2009 2 . 37 

# Y es 9 

## -2 . 60 

# Yes 9 

# • Zero Drift Met on all Days - indicating little loss ofHg • Difficulty 

# Meeting Upscale
- Problems with HovaCaJTM
Cooper Environmental 

## Services 16 

## VES01128 2

# Field HgCI 2 

# Linearity (System Integrity Check) C

o n centrat io n lJ 1S**~** 14

## ~ 1 l 

# .., "';) ..!. 10

### ~ 

## cS 

## s 

# ... :z: 

# 3 c 

# • l :) 

### I ·1 

# 1**~** 

# N o m in a l Pass I Pass



# . #of S a m ple AVE % Error Co nc.entrat 1 0 11 . . r , 

# CAMR C u rre nt

4 6 

## s 10 

### •; = 1 . 0465x- 0.0415 R

1 = 0 991S

1 1 

### tJ HovaCal H e Cont. (ui/ d S<m) 

### Cooper Environmental Services 1 6 

### 1S 1 0 

# PS12A Y

es Y

es Y

es Yes

J 

## 7



## V E S011283

# Field Hg 0 

# Linearity

. _ · · r ss • .. c • 

# t

. . . · · ren 

# I "1 1 2A 1S 16 14 

# -e 1: 

# "'

# ~ 

# ! 10 

# ¥ 

# .s s 

# .. %

## ~ 6 

# Prdble ' v 

## = 0. 956lll· 0 .613S

R:' 

### = 0 .9914 

# ovaCal Conversion of HgCI2 t lJ¥ r;JHU.

# D~"dl4'>v ,t.. J' 

# L,.uvv , • vi , 'IP'? 111 • 20 

# Co 4 1 2 

### 16 lS 6 

## s 1 0 14 Holll!Cal 

### He Cone . (ug /d S<ml



### Cooper Environmental Services 

# es 0 

# es \0



## 1 8



## V ES 011284

# Why we think there was a problem with HovaCalTM • Visib le Rust in Tubing Exiting HovaCalTM • Problem s Maintaining Heating
-**he~** 

# wou ld frequently 

# fai l requiring the Ho vaCalTM to coo l**do nd**  

# restart • Were Using 

# HovaCalTM at the Very High 

# Enq of Recommended Emission Range

Cooper Env ironme ntal Servi ces 

## 19 VES011285

# Thermo Hg Freedom Comparison

Ave % D ate ( s) X

# a c t T h e rmo D i fference 

## 3/ 20/ 2009 8 . 91 8 .49 

## 4 . 87 3/ 21 / 2009 7 . 12 8 . 25 -13 . 52 

# . 3/22/2009 6 . 94 7 . 96 - 1 2 . 54**~** 

## 3

/ 23/ 2009 7 . 16 7 . 76 -7 . 13 3

/ 24 / 2009 7 . 28 7 . 39 - 1 . 53 3

/ 25/ 2009 7 . 97 7 . 14 11 . 63 3/ 2 6/ 2009 7 . 55 7 . 30 3 . 44 

## 3/ 27/ 2009 6 . 88 6 . 65 4 . 00 3 i 28/ 2009 6 . 83 6 . 54 4 . 91 3/ 29/ 2009 6 . 90 7 . 65 - 10 . 67 3/ 30 / 2009 7 . 83 8 . 89 -12 . 07 3

/ 31 / 2009 8 . 36 

## 8 . 58

- 2...4.6 

## A ll Days 

## 7.42 7.78

# 4.09**..)** Cooper Envi r

onmental Services 

# 2 0 VESOII286

# RATA Results 10



# 9 

# - E 

# 8 1.1 Ill 

### "a 

# 7 

# "DD JL 6 

# Mlb' v .... cJ 

# 5 c: 0 

# u 4 

# >**~** 

# s • CES Xa ct 

## 0 Method 

## 308 :l 1.1 

# 3**~ ~**  

## 2**~** 

## Therm oCMM 

# 1 0 0 1 2 

# 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 11 12 1 3 RATA Numb e r
Cooper Environmental Services 

## 2 1 

## VES011287

# Conclusions • CES Xact Can Accurately Measure Mercury in a Coal Fired Power Plant • If the XactTM had recalibrated to the generator (HovaCalTM) as most Hg CE would likely have failed the RATA cury d o - it • It is feasible to use the Xact to Meas ure Mercury on a Coal Fired Power Plant

- Need a Mercury Generator Designed to Operate on XactTM Flows

Cooper Environmental Services 

# 22 VES011288

# Differences Between XactTM and AF Based Mercury Monitors • XactTM Requires Longer Sampling Times ( 15 minutes ver s u s 1 to 2 minutes ) • XRF Calibrations are very stable ( 1 yea nee d s to b e recalibrated frequ ently • XactTM is less dependant on t h e accuracy oftheHg generator • Since XRF is Non Destructive Samples Can be Archived and Potentially Reanalyzed if Data need s to be validated • XactTM coul d be u se d to monitor for other metal s

- PM is a smTogate fo r HAP Metals ,

- If EPA requires PM CEMS on CFPP Xact co uld potentially be used fo r Hg and HAP 

# m eta ls

-**Th~refore** 

# 1 CEMS (multi-meta ls inc ludin g Hg) instead of 2 H g CEMS and PM CEMS Cooper Env ironmental Services 

# 23 VESOII289

# UESTIO

Krag P etterson kragp (a"J cooperc nviron mental. co m

Cooper Environmen tal Services 

# S?

24 

## VES011290

# VES011291 . pdf

# rf.iiif.il**~** US Army Corps o f Engineers ., Enginee r Research and Development Center 

# X-Ray Fluorescence-Based Multi-Metal Continuous Emission Monitor Technology Demonstration K . James Hay , Veera M. Boddu , March 2005 Bruce E . Johnsen, and John A . Cooper



### CES



## • •

App rOYI!KI fQc pl.blk: re t oa.co ; d ktribubOI\ k**un!l~ .**  

## VESOI 1291

### ERDC/CERL TR-05-9 March 2005 

# X-Ray Fluorescence Based Multi-Metal Continuous Emission Monitor: Technology Demonstration K. J ames Hay and Veera 

### M . Boddu 

### Construction Engineering Research 

### Laboratory POBox9005 Champaign, IL 61826-9005 

### Bruce E . Johnsen and John A. Cooper Cooper Environmental 

### SeNices 10170 

### SW Nimbus Avenue, Suite H5 Porlland , OR 9 7 223-4340



### Final Report Approved f or pu bic release ; dlstr1buUoo Is**unhm~ed .** 



### Prepared fo r U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Washington, DC 20314-1000 Under Work Unit #CNE-6091 

## VES011292A BSTRA CT: Anny demi litarizntion incinCtlllorS will need to com pl y with the Hazardocs Wo.ste Combustor National Emission Sta n

dard f t )r t-lazardou." Air Pnllutan t ll t

h at will regulate metal" and me t al**comround~** listed u n

d

er the Clean Air A ct Amendmenrs . A l1u>ge problem 

### ro r t ha;c incinerator operali ons is limited knowlcdKe 

### or 1he type and q uanti ty of e 1 n

itted metals. so t hor compliance 1 n ay be d etermined onl y t h

r ough tria l bum emissio n teSts. A continuous em issi on 11o n itor tCEM) fo r m u

hi.Jnc U tls wi ll provi d e the emission d ata, a tool 1 0 he l p meet co mplianctrcquiremenfs, a nd the opporrun i1 y to adjwl burn s t rat

egies for i n creas ed prod uc tion. A •scr - frien d ly ntulti
- met a l CEM that 

### uses x -m y fluo rciiCCn cc (XRF) 

### as t he analytical method and an automa t e d 

### •amp l ing sy.tc onthaf p r ov ide< t"xlnH:Iivl!:**~tch s~m** **line** t\n l n " filter llll"c (XCEM) wa\ d emoru. t r ated at t he J236 Dcacc i vation Fum .. <tce a t Toc.x: l e Anny**Depo~** Utab. The uoit was compar•'<l•o EPA Reference M ethod 29 durin g t wo separnt e t

ests (2001 and 2002). The secon d test wJ.s pcrfonned aflcr improvements wen:: made 

### to the sam ple trtl.t\SpOrt and system caUbratjons. The results iodicaa e that the XCEM has met t he proposed Perfonnance Specification 10 for roolri·mctal <:EMs excepl for relative acwracy <CQUiremencs f<>< 4 of 9 metals. II$ failures a. re attnbu ted mostly to inadcqullCics io the reference method. The n101itor is proving useful 1 1 Tooele and is ready for impl ementation at**och~** Anny den.tnirarization 

### incinerators.

DI SCLAIMER: The cootmu of1h1s l'qlOrt an: no110 be ustd f01**adn~nising.** publiCJ.tiOI\ or pnmcxional purposes. Citation of l13de names docs not eonstitutca:n official eodor1tment o r approval M t be use 

## or aucb commcrcW produec:s. All product nana and trademarks eittd are lbc property oft heir respecti ve owners.. The findin.pof thit n:pot\ :are not to be construed as ao llftitls l Depactnk'nl ofI he Army posi•ioo unless so designated by other aucborized dut umencs. DESTROY THIS REPORT W H EN I T IS N O LON G ER NEEDED . DO NOT RE1 ' U RN IT fO T il E ORI GI N ATO R. 

## VESO II 2 9 3ERDC/C ERL TR-l)S.!I ii



# Contents
List of Figures and Tables ....... ......... .. ... .... . .. ........ .......... ... ... ..........,_,._........ ..... - ...................... .. v 

### Conversim Factors ....................... - ....... ......... ... .................. _ ................ .......... - ....... .................. vii Preface .. - - --··- ..-· ·· - · .. - .. . ................ .. - ..... - ............. - ............. - ..... - ....... ....- ..... .. - ........ - vii lntrod> Jcti on . .... .. .... . . ..... ........ _ ................................_ ........ _ .... ............_ .. _ ............... ... ..... - .. . 1 Background ............... ............ .. .. . . .... . ..... . .. ..... .................................... .. ............. ..... . ............. 1 Objeclille .... . .. ................ . ........ .... .... . ..... ........ .. . ..... ..... . . . ....... ...... . .... . .... ..... .. .. ... ..... .. . . ...... ..... J Approach ...... . .. . .... ............. .. ............. .............................. .. ..... ....... ............. .. ....................... 4 Mode of Techno l ogy T ran s fer .............. ..... ........ ................ ........ ...... . ... ...... .......................... 4 2 Field Testing 2001 _ ................_ .. _ ....... .... .... .. .. ....... ._ .. .................... ... .................................... 5 Brief Description of XCEM ... ..... ... .. .. .... ... .. ... .... .............. . .. .. ........... . ......... .. ............. ..... ... .. . . 5**Ext~>clion** Systom.. ........ .... ................. ....... ........... ........ .. .. .. .. ..................... ................. .... ...... ...... .. 5

San:!>/ing ondAnalysis System ... ................... ..... ..... ..................... .................. ...... ............... .... ..... 6 Convol 

## $YSiem.. ........................ .. .. ....... ... .. .... ... ........ .. ..... ................... ... ................... .... .... .. ........ 7**Exec:~Alon** of Field-Te sting Activities ............. ........ . ............... .. ........... ...................... .... .. .. ... 7 Test Plan. ....................................................... .. . ..... ..... ......... ....... . .. ........... ...... ............................ .. . 8 EPA Verifi<;aficn .... ......... ..... _ ........... ................. .. _ .. ... .......... .................... . . ......... .......... ... ....... 9 TEAD lr!lotface ........ ......................... .... ........ .... ............ ............................................ .. ............ .... .. 9 T estObjeclives .... .. .............. .......... .. .. .. .. ........... .......... ....... ....... ... ... .... ......................................... 10 Site Description .. .... ...................... .. ......... ...... ...... ... .... ......... ... .................... .. ........ ...... .. ....... ...... .. 11 Exporimon tal Design ............. .... ..... .... . ........ .. ...... ... ....... .... .... ..... .... ..................... .............. ...... .... 14 Res uts .... . ...... . ........ .... .. . ......... . ...... .... ..... .. ........ ......... .............. .... . . ... .................. . ........... . 15

XCEM Reported Conc<tntmtlons .. ................... .. ..... ....... .. .. . .. ... ................ .. ........ .............. ........... . 15 Sa rr.p/Jng and ReSPQnSO Tlfllll .......... ................ ............ ...... .... ...... .... ............. .......... ........ .. ........ . 19 Ze

ro and Calibration Drfll. ....... ..... ...... .. ........... ..... ... .. ....... . ............. .. .... .. ........ .... ......... .. .. . . ........ .. 19 Correlation with Releronoo M olhod.. .... .. ......... .................... ... .. . .. .. ........... ...... ............. ......... .... . 20 Res;>MSe to Change•ln Molal Conc:entratlotl ........... ............................ .. ... ....................... . ...... 25 Rei21Ne .Acwracy.................................................... ............ . ...... . . ............................................. 25 Predsion............................. - ............. ........ ......... ... . ................ . ...... .................................... ....... . 33 Lo...u..el Molal ReSP<J(I$0 .... ....... ............ .......... ......... ... .... ............. . .. ... .............. ...... .......- ..... 35 Bias .. . .. . ......... ....... . ...... ....... ... ..................... . .. .... . .... ..... ..... ............... ........... ............ ......... .... ....... 36 Summary .. ..... . .. . . . .... .................... .... .............. ...... .. . ........................ . ....... .. ............. ........... 37


## VES011294tv ERDC/CERL TR-45-9

3 Transport and Calibration Improvements .. ... .. .. _,_,,_,, .. ......... _ ... .. .. .... .... ,_ , ....... ........ ..... 39 T ra n sport Line Cha ng es ............ .. .... ... ........ .... . ............. .. . . ... ... . . . . .. .. . . .. .................... . . . . . .. .. 39 Re ca ibralio n .... .. ......................... . ............... .... . ...... .. ... . . .. .. . .. . ...... . .. . ... . . ........... . ....... . . .. . .. .. 40 Summary of Tran s port and Calib ra tion Eva lu a ti ons .......... . ... . . . . .. . . . .. ...... .... ...... .... ....... ..... 4 0 4 M29 Comparison Testing of XCEM 2002 ........ .... .. .. . .... .- ...... ... .. ..... . .. .. ... . . ... ........ ... .. ... . ....... 42 ResUII$ . . .. .. . . . . ..... . ......... . .. . ............ . . .. . . .. .. . .. . .... .. . ......... . ...... ............. . ...... . ................ ...... ...... 42 Mellx>d 29 Conoontmllons ......... ........ ... . ....... ... ..... . .... .. ......... . . ............. ... ... ........ . ..................... .. 42 Prer:icled Slack G as Concenlt&lloM ... . ..... . ... . ........ . . ..... . . . .... .... . .... .. .... ............. .......... . ....... .. .... 43 XCEM Concent1lllion s ..................... .. . . ......... ....... ... . .. ... . ... ..... ................................................... 47 XCEM Ca l ibration Evaluation Us< ng A OuanX - XRF and ICP/MS ........ .............. ............ 53 

### Precision ............................................................. ...... . ... .. .. ................ ... .. ............... ........... 53 Discussion .. . . ....... . .. ............ .... ........ . . .................... . . . ...... . .... ... ......................................... 54

Regulated Elements Typ/c81/'y Found i n the F eedStleam ....... ... ..... . . ..... .............. .. .... .......... ........ 54 Regulated Elemonrs Not Typicolly Foun d in TEAD Emissions. . .. .. .. ... .. . . ... .. ....... ........ . . .... . . ...... ... 58 Nonregulared MstDis .... . ......... ......... . . . ..... . .... . .... . .. . .. . . ... .. ...... .. .. ...... .. ................ ..... .. ...... ... ....... .. 63 Summary . . ..... .. . . . . . . ..... . ....... .. . . ..... . . . .. . .. .. ...... .. ..... .. ..... ........ . .. . ... . .. .... .... . ...... ... . . ................ 63 5 XCEM Cost and Status ....... ....... . ............................. . . ... .. - ................ ... .. .... .. ...... ... .... .... _ ...... 65 Cost Estimates ........ . .. ... ........ ..... .. ... ............... .. ................. ........ . ..... . . . .......... ..... ...... . . .. .. .... 6 5

Gaplal Costs ...... . ...... .............. .......... ... ..... . . . .. ........ .. .. ........... . . ............... . ............... .. ................... 65 A nnllaf Costs ..................... . ............... ........... .. ..... ....... . .......................... ... .................................. 66 Contiooed Use of the X CE M ........... ........ . .... ..... . .. . . . ........ . .. ..... ... . . . ..... . ................... . .... .. ... 66 6 Surmwy and Conclus i ons ......................... .- .................. - .• - .. ........ . , _ .. ,, .... _.,_ ..., ... _ .. 68 References .. - ... .......... - ...... .. . ... .. ... . ... ... ... . .... . ... .. .. ... .....- . . . .. ........ ... . ............... ..... ... ... ... ............ ... . 7 1 AppendixA: Test/QA Plan for Verification of a Continuous Em i ssion M onitor for I'AJJti.metais at Tooelo Army Depot (2001) .......... . .. .. .... .. _,_ ... .. .... . ............... ............ .. - ..... 73 Appendix B : Determination of XCEM Raported Concentrations 2001 . .. .... .. ... .. ... ........ .. 101 AppendixC: Transport and Calibration Evaiuations .... .. .. ...................... ..... .. ................... 106 Appendix D: Me rcury Calibration and Loss Discussion 2002 .. .. .. .. .. ...................... .. ...... 117 Abbreviations and Acronyms ..................... .. ..... _ .. .... .. ....... ... _ , _,,_,. .. , .... _ .. .... ..... ,_ , .. ....... .. 125 Report Documentation Page ..................._ , _,.. , ... _, _ ___ _ _____ , ... .. ... ......... .. .. .. .... . ...... ... ...... 127



## VESOII295EROCICERL TR-OS-9 v



# List of Figures and Tables Figures 1 X CEM sti lli ng cham ber a nd sam pli ng cassette . .. . .... .. . ...................... . ..... . .. .. .... . .. . . .. 6 2 XCEM chass i s ........................... .. ... .... ........ . . ...... .... .. . ............ .. ... ............ ............ . .. .. 7 

### 3 New Component Control Screen for XCEM software i n te rface .................. .. .. . ....... 8 4 XC E M hous i ng and tra n sport li ne. M29 samp l i ng setup, stack , a nd ceram i c b ag h o use a t TEAO .......... . .. . ......... . ... ... .......... . ....................... . .................. ... ..... .... . 10 5 TE AO incinerato r setup and sampli n g/ s pikin g location s ........... ........ .................... 13 

### 6 Spi k ing at base o f stack d u ring validation testi n g .. . ............ . .......... . ......... . ............ 15 7 Palladi u m concentrat ions duri ng M29 testi ng .................... ........ .............. . .. .. . .. .. . .. 21 8 XCEM and 

### M29 concentratio ns duri ng T EAO veri fi cat ion te sting .................. ... . ... 

### 22 9 Co rre la tion betwee n XCEM a nd M29 for elements spiked at two l evels .............. 24 10 XCEM a nd M29 1 ead concentrations du ri ng run s 8 - 11 ...................... .. ................. 28 11 Rati o of XCEM to M 29 con ce nt rations d uri ng va l idation testing . ...... ..... .. ............. 30 1 2 Uncorrecte d XCEM As co ncent rations ve rs us XCEM Pb concentrati ons .. . .......... 32 13 Correlati on betwee n Sn and other AP E - 1236 metals with m unitions bum l"l g n n d no opiking ..... . . .... . .. . . .... . .... . .... . ..................... . ........ . .. . . ................................. .... 46 14 XCEM tin m easu r ements during M29 tes t i n g .......................... . .............. . .............. 46 1 5 XCE M versus M29 1 ead fO<' va li dation t ests ............................ .. ............. . .............. 

### 56 16 Percent d ifference between M 29 and t he XCEM v ersus pe rce nt o f Hg on M29 fill er ............ . ... ....... ... ......... . ..................... ..... .. ....... ..... . ..... ....... ...... ........ . ........ 60 17 2004 CES metals mon iiO<' .................. .. ... .. ............. . ................................. .. . .. ........ 

### 67 C 1 Expe ri me n tal d es ign for atomiza ti on tests ........................ ......... .... .. . .... .............. 1 07 C2 XC E M re porte d concentrati ons for non spl ked elements ............. . .............. ... .... .. . 11 3 C3 XCEM reported co n ce nt rations and MSE-projected concentrations for spiked e l e m ents ........ . ......... . .... ....... ........ . .... . ...................... . .............. . .... . ......... ... 1 14 0 1 Co m pa ri son of XCEM x- ray spectra mea s ured d u rin g M29 testing and 71 days l a ter ... . ............ . ........................ . . .. . ...................... . .................... . ...... . ............ 121 02 P er ce nt diffe rence between M29 and the XCEM 

### vs. perce nt of 

### Hg on the M29 fille r ....... . .... .. ............. .. ....... . ....... . .... ... . .. ................ ......... .. ..... .. ..... .......... . .. ... 123



## VES011296vi ERDC/CERL TR -05-9

Table s 1 Army hazardous waste combustors .... ... .... ... .................... ................ .... ...... . .......... . 2 2 Proposed P$- 10 requ i rements .. ... ........ ... ........ ... . . .... .. .... ...... . ................................... 3 3 XCEM test dates a n d associated 

### lEAD incineration leedstream ..... .. .......... .. ......... 9 4 Typ i ca l operati ng pa ramete rs l or the APE - 1236 deactivat ion furnace ................... 12 5 

### T EAO metal em i ssion l i m its d uri ng ve ri fo::ation testing ............... ..... ................... . .. 12 6 

### TEAO i nci n erator m e ta l emiss ion**mils** and sp ik ing l evels .............. .. .................... 14 7 F i nal reported CEM concentrati ons l or M29testing ......... .. .... . .. ....... .. .... ................ 17 8 UpScale and zero co n centrati ons d u ring val i dation testing .............. .. .. .. .. .... .......... 20 9 Correlation between t he XCEM and M29........................................ . ...... ............... . 25 10 XCEM meas u red, M29 measured, and MSE-predicted meta l concen trati ons during TEAD va l ida tio n testing ............................................ .. .... . .. .. ....... ................ . 26 1 1 Relati ve accuracy and corre l a tio n s ........... .............................. ............... .. .............. 27 12 Perce nt differences between M29 sample trains ......... ............ .... ........ ........ ....... ... 

### 34 13 XCEM and M29 preci s i o n ........................ ..... . ....................................... ................. 35 1 4 Method 301 b ias and correct i on 

### factor compa ri son ............................................... 37 1 5 Summary o f XCEM performance relative to proposed PS-10 requirements ......... 38 16 M29 con centra ti ons . ................................................................. . ............................. 43 17 APE-1236 stack 

## now rates duri ng M29 testi n g ...................................................... 4 4 18 APE-t 2 36 stac k co n ce ntrations w ith m u nitions inci neration but no spi k ing ......... .45 19 Pred i cted stack concentrati ons based o n MSE -TA spi king and backgrou nd •stimales .. .. .. ........... .. ...... .... . .. . ..... ..... .. ... ...... . .. . ............................................. . .. ... ... 47 20 XCEM concentrat ions... .... .... .. ............ .... . ....... .... ........ .................... ....... .. ............... 4 8 21 Analysis o f XCEM fi lter tape by Columbia Ana l ytical ..................... .. .. .. ......... .. ....... 53 22 P red i cted (sp i ked) , XCEM, a nd M29 precision duri ng va l idati on testing .... . .......... 53 23 

### T EAD emission l im i ts lor regu l ated elements ...... .. ................... . .. .... .. .................... 54 2 4 Summary of Pb conce ntrati o n data and ratios during M29 testi ng ................... . .... 55 25 Summary of Cd co n centration data and ratios during M29 testi ng ........................ 57 26 Summary of Cr concentratio n data and ra ti os during M29 testing ..................... .. .. 58 2 7 Su m mary ofAs conce nt ration data and ratios during M29 testi n g ........................ 59 28 Su m mary of Hg conce n trati o n data and ratios during M29 testing .... .. .......... .. ...... 60 2 9 Su mmary of Sb concentrati on data and rat ios during M29 t esti ng .............. .. ..... ... 6 1 30 Summary of N l con centration data and r atios during M29 testing . .. .. .. .... .............. 62 3 1 Summary of Ba co ncentrat i on data du ri ng M29 testing .. ....... .. .......... ... ........... ..... . 62 32 Summary of Zn conce n tration data and ratios during M 29 testi ng ......... ............... 63 33 Su m mary of 200 2 M29/XCE M comparison results ................................................ 64



## V ES011297ERDC/CERL TR-GS-9

81 Or ig i nal XCEM reported concen trati ons un ccr rec led for calibrati o n an d dryer c h anges . . .. . ............ . . .. . ......... . . . .. .. . . .. .. . . .. . .. . ....... .... .... . ... . ............ ... . ..... . . . ... .. . .... . .... . 103 82 Results of dryer tests .................................. . . . .................................... . ...... . . . ......... 105 C1 F l ow rates and concentrations used to calculate a tomization concentrations .... . 109 C2 Atomizalion vs. XCEM concentrations .... . ........................... ............. . .. .. .. ............ 109 C3 Total capture mass vs . a tomization mass . ..... ..... ..................................... . .. . ........ 1 11 C4 L ead no rm alized atomiz.atlon mass vs. total capture . .. . . . ....... ...... ...... .. .. . ........... . .. 111 CS 1.1eth od 17 vs. XCEM at TEAO .......... .... ...... ... . ........ .... . . . ........................... ........... 116 01 Meteury reported conce ntra ti ons d u ri ng Ye ar 2002 M29 valida ti on tasti ng . ........ 120 02 Co m pa ri so n of the loca tio n In M29 samp ling tra i ns whe re t he Hg was deposited du ri ng the 2001 a n d 2002 tests . . .... . .. . . . . . . . .. . .. ................ . .. . . .. . .... . . . . ..... 122


# Conversion Factors

Non-Sl• units ofmeasurement 

### u.scd in this report can be converted to SI units 

### as follow&:



## VESOI1298

# "' " ERDC/C E RL TR-05-9



# Preface This 

### stucy was conducted for Headquarters, Department o f the Army 

### under Pro · gram Element 063728A, "Environmental Technology Demonstra ti on"; Project 

### 002, "Environmental Compliance Technology• ; Work Unit CNE · B091 , "Hazard· ous Air Pollutants Technology Demonstrations." The technical reviewer was Thomas Logan, U . S. Environmental Protection Agency. T he work was petformed by the E nviromnental Process Branch (CN
- E ) of the Installa t ions Di vision (CN) , Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL). The CERL Principal Inv estigator was Dr . K 

### James Ha y. Part of this work was done by Cooper Environm ental Services under DACA42-02-P-0072 and DACA42-0l·C-0022; MSE Technology Applications, Inc. under GS
- 10 F-02l2K; and the U.S. Army Center for Health P romotion and Preventive Medicine. The technical editor w as Linda L. Wheatley, Information Technology Laboratory - Champa ign. D r. Kirankumar V. 

### Topudurti is Chief, CN
- E, and Dr . John T. 

### Bandy is Chief, CN. The associated Technica l Director was Gary 

### W. Schanche. The Director ofCER L is Dr. Alan W. Moore . CERL is an element of the U.S. Arm y Engineer Re search and Development Center (ERDC), U.S . Army Corps of Engineers. The Commander and Executive Director**~f** 

### ERDC is COL James Rowan , and the Director of ERDC is 

### Dr. James 

### R. Houston.



## VES011299