alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 151 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 151

 To amend chapter 15 of title 5, United States Code, to eliminate the 
 provision prohibiting certain State and local employees from seeking 
                            elective office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Solomon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend chapter 15 of title 5, United States Code, to eliminate the 
 provision prohibiting certain State and local employees from seeking 
                            elective office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State and Local Employees Bill of 
Political Rights''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF PROHIBITION.

    (a) In General.--Section 1502(a) of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1) by inserting ``or'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) in paragraph (2) by striking ``; or'' and inserting a 
        period; and
            (3) by striking paragraph (3).
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 1502 of title 5, united states code.--Section 
        1502 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking 
        subsection (c).
            (2) Section 1503 of title 5, united states code.--
                    (A) Repeal.--Section 1503 of title 5, United States 
                Code, is repealed.
                    (B) Table of sections.--The item relating to 
                section 1503 in the table of sections for chapter 15 of 
                title 5, United States Code, is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
§ 35.03-25 Additional requirements for hybrid work vests. ( a ) In addition to the other requirements in this subpart, commercial hybrid PFD's must be— ( 1 ) Used, stowed, and maintained in accordance with the procedures set out in the manual required for these devices by § 160.077-29 of this chapter and any limitation(s) marked on them; and
( 2 ) Of the same or similar design and have the same method of operation as each other hybrid PFD carried on board.
[CGD 78-174A, 51 FR 4350, Feb. 4, 1986; 51 FR 15497, Apr. 24, 1986]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Regulatory Commission

# Name of Agency:

Postal Regulatory Commission.

# Time and Date:

Wednesday, April 25, 2007 at 10:30 a.m.

# Place:

Commission conference room, 901 New York Avenue, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20268-0001.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

Docket No. R2006-1—reconsideration of aspects of recommended decision for which reconsideration was sought by the U.S. Postal Service Governors in their March 19, 2007 decision.

# For Further Information Contact:

Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, Postal Regulatory Commission, 901 New York Avenue, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20268-0001, 202-789-6818.

Dated: April 24, 2007.

Steven W. Williams,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 07-2086 Filed 4-24-07; 3:38 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-FW-M
GAO-01-143R Women’s Army Corps Veterans’ Association

United States General Accounting Office

Washington, DC 20548

October 27, 2000

The Honorable Henry J. Hyde

Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary

House of Representatives

Subject: Federally Chartered Corporation: Review of the Financial Statement Audit

Report for the Women’s Army Corps Veterans’ Association for Fiscal Year

1999

Dear Mr. Chairman:

As requested, we reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of the

Women’s Army Corps Veterans’ Association, a federally chartered corporation, for

the fiscal year ended June 30, 1999. The corporation promotes the general welfare of

all Veterans, especially women veterans, who have served or are serving in the United

States Army, the Army Reserve, and the Army National Guard. The corporation

recognizes outstanding women in college ROTC units and provides services and

support to patients in medical facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs

throughout the United States.

Federally chartered corporations are required under 36 U.S.C. 10101 to

• present the corporation’s assets and liabilities and reasonable detail on the

corporation’s income and expenses in annual financial statements,

• obtain an annual financial audit by an independent public accountant, and

• submit the auditors’ report and the corporation’s financial statements to the

Congress.

The objective of our review was to determine whether the audit report complied with

the financial reporting requirements of the law. In carrying out our work, we

reviewed the corporation’s financial statements and the accompanying notes,

performed certain analytical procedures related to information presented in the

financial statements, reviewed the auditors’ report, and made inquiries to corporation

officials or the auditor as we deemed necessary. We did not review the auditors’

working papers. Our review disclosed no reportable instances of noncompliance.
Page 2 GAO-01-143R Women’s Army Corps Veterans’ Association

The audit report included the auditors’ opinion that the financial statements of the

corporation were presented fairly in accordance with generally accepted accounting

principles. We are returning the audit report you sent with your letter.

Sincerely yours,

Jeffrey C. Steinhoff

Managing Director

Financial Management and Assurance

w/o Enclosure

(912016)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<NAME>                        AMERICAN MEDICAL ALERT CORP.
<CIK>                         0000700721
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                     231,320
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                            1,562,267
<ALLOWANCES>                                30,000
<INVENTORY>                              1,717,278
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         3,296,619
<PP&E>                                   3,226,877
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           7,096,188
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      817,019
<BONDS>                                    466,576
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    58,878
<OTHER-SE>                               5,955,047
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             7,096,188
<SALES>                                    291,893
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         3,576,686
<CGS>                                      270,419
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            2,882,859
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          23,934
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            693,827
<INCOME-TAX>                               305,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               388,127
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0
        







</TABLE>
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Rykowski, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Rykowski*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 21.]

(Nos. 98-634 and 98-674

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided November 25, 1998.)

*Ronald J. O’Brien,*Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Steven L. Taylor,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

*Judith M. Stevenson,*Franklin County Public Defender, and *David L. Strait,*Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

*22The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
# C_2012184EN.01001202.xml

| 23.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/12

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 May 2012 — Amador López v OHIM (AUTOCOACHING)

(Case T-325/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark AUTOCOACHING - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 8(1)(b) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 184/21

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Pedro Germán Amador López (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: A. Falcón Morales, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 March 2011 (Case R 1665/2010-2) concerning an application for registration of the word mark AUTOCOACHING as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Pedro Germán Amador López to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Pedro Germán Amador López to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.

1

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

 

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Highlands Bankshares, Inc. registration statement on Form S-3D (Registration No. 333-83618) of our report dated January 30, 2009 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and for the periods then ended. Such report is included in the Highlands Bankshares,            Inc. 2008 Annual Report to Stockholders, which is filed as exhibit 13 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

                                                                                                                   /s/Brown, Edwards & Company, L.L.P.

|   | CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS |
|--------|------------------------------|

 

 

 

Bluefield, West Virginia

March 27, 2009

 

 

 

 
|   |
|--------|
EXHIBIT 11


STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE
(in thousands, except loss per share data)




Primary and Fully Diluted
Loss per Share:

		    Three Months ended 9/30/96,   Nine Months ended 9/30/96,
			  1996        1995              1996      1995

Net loss                 ($221)      ($103)            ($638)    ($364)


Weighted average common 
 shares outstanding     12,602      11,387            12,596    10,839

Loss per share          ($0.02)     ($0.01)            ($.05)    ($.03)
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE03527
THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      22,451,111
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,076,018
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             4,400,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 43,445,839
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      42,534,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        71,856,770
<LOANS>                                     92,152,759
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,034,084
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             243,533,007
<DEPOSITS>                                 222,174,352
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          3,317,719
<LONG-TERM>                                  4,843,210
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,285
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,186,441
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             243,533,007
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,761,004
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            5,964,771
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               735,962
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            13,461,737
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,327,656
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,857,235
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        9,604,502
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                4,256,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              20,921
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             12,509,270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,952,528)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,057,828)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.96)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.34
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,783,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   122,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             1,167,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                500,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,070,426
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                3,353,112
<RECOVERIES>                                    60,670
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,034,084
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           275,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,759,084
        



</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending July 26, 2008

|Filer                       | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                                  
|--------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|SECURITY CALIFORNIA BANCORP | 3A1            | Security California Bancorp to become a bank  holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Security Bank of California, both of Riverside, California. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                  | Not applicable
|Federal Register:           | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Defendants’ Notice of Appeal Page 1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

DALLAS DIVISION 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, § 

 § 

 Plaintiff, § 

 § 

v. § Civil Action No.: 3:09-CV-0444 

 § 

JODY L. NOVACEK, REPUBLICAN § NOTICE OF APPEAL 

VICTORY COMMITTEE, INC., also § 

known as REPUBLICAN VICTORY § 

2004 COMMITTEE, BPO, INC., and § 

BPO ADVANTAGE, LP, § 

 § 

 Defendants § 

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Notice is hereby given that JODY L. NOVACEK, REPUBLICAN VICTORY 

COMMITTEE, INC., also known as REPUBLICAN VICTORY 2004 COMMITTEE, 

BPO, INC., and BPO ADVANTAGE, LP, Defendants in the above-styled case, hereby 

appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit from the order granting 

Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and the Final Judgment entered in this action 

on the 14th day of April, 2010. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 By: . /s/ Jody L. Novacek .

Jody L. Novacek 

Case 3:09-cv-00444-M Document 39 Filed 05/15/10 Page 1 of 2 PageID 1089
Defendants’ Notice of Appeal Page 2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was delivered to 

counsel of record, Greg J. Mueller, Federal Election Commission in accordance with the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure via the CM/ECF system upon the filing hereof on this 

14th day of May, 2010. 

 . /s/ Jody L. Novacek .

 Jody L. Novacek 

Case 3:09-cv-00444-M Document 39 Filed 05/15/10 Page 2 of 2 PageID 1090
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending June 23, 2007

|Filer                        | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                              
|---------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|SHORE BANK                   | * Branch       | Shore Bank, Onley, Virginia, proposes to establish a branch at 103 Pocomoke Marketplace, Pocomoke, Maryland.                                                                                                        | Newspaper:07/02/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                   | 07/02/2007    
|Federal Register:            | Not applicable
|UNION BANK AND TRUST COMPANY | * 18C          | Union Bank and Trust Company, Bowling Green, Virginia, to acquire certain assets and assume certain liabilities of the Charlottesville, Virginia, branch office of Provident Bank of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland. | Newspaper:07/20/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                   | 07/20/2007    
|Federal Register:            | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
# C_2014253EN.01002402.xml

| 4.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 June 2014 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-260/11) (1)

1

((Fisheries - Conservation of fishery resources - Spain exceeding mackerel fishing quotas in zones VIIIc, IX and X in EU waters of CECAF 34.1.1 for 2010 - Deductions from fishing quotas for 2011 to 2015 - Rights of the defense - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Equal treatment))

2014/C 253/34

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: initially N. Díaz Abad and L. Banciella Rodríguez-Miñón, then M. Sampoll Pucurull and Banciella Rodríguez-Miñón, abogados del Estado)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet, F. Jimeno Fernández and D. Nardi, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) No 165/2011 of 22 February 2011 providing for deductions from certain mackerel quotas allocated to Spain in 2011 and subsequent years on account of overfishing in 2010 (OJ 2011 L 48, p. 11).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 16.7.2011.

1

---
EXHIBIT
23.1





Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-1 (No. 333-132990), Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-118708, 333-106831, 333-96605 and
333-165031) and Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-43776, 333-137913, 333-109047, 333-105375,
333-41290 and 333-146302) of Merriman Curhan Ford Group, Inc. of our reports
dated March 18, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Merriman Curhan Ford Group, Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2009, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Merriman Curhan
Ford Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2009 included in this Form
10-K.




/s/
      Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc.




San
Francisco, California


March 18,
2010