alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

_____________________________________ 

 

 

_____________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 5, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129152(64) Michael F. Cavanagh 

129154(89) Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices SC 129152 
 v CoA 247718

 Wayne CC 02-05202 
 CEDRIC PIPES, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 SC 129154 
 v CoA 247719

 Wayne CC 02-05202 
 JULIAN DALE KEY, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by plaintiff-appellant for 

extension to December 21, 2005 of the time for filing their brief and appendix is 

considered, and it is GRANTED. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 5, 2006 

Clerk
§ 327.47 Proof of amount claimed for personal injury. The following evidence must be presented when appropriate in claims: ( a ) Itemized medical, hospital, and burial bills.
( b ) A written report by the attending physician including: ( 1 ) The nature and extent of the injury and the treatment;
( 2 ) The necessity and reasonableness of the various medical expenses incurred;
( 3 ) Duration of time injuries prevented or limited employment;
( 4 ) Past, present, and future limitations on employment;
( 5 ) Duration and extent of pain and suffering and of any disability or physical disfigurement;
( 6 ) A current prognosis;
( 7 ) Any anticipated medical expenses;
( 8 ) Any past medical history of the claimant relevant to the particular injury alleged; and
( 9 ) At the request of the Maritime Administration, an examination by an independent medical facility or physician may be required to provide independent medical evidence against which to evaluate the written report of the claimant's physician. The Maritime Administration determines the need for this examination, makes mutually convenient arrangements for such an examination, and bears the costs thereof.
( c ) All hospital records or other medical documents from either this injury or any relevant past injury.
( d ) If the claimant is employed, a written statement by the claimant's employer certifying the claimant's: ( 1 ) Age;
( 2 ) Occupation;
( 3 ) Hours of employment;
( 4 ) Hourly rate of pay or weekly salary;
( 5 ) Time lost from work as a result of the incident; and
( 6 ) Claimant's actual period of employment, full-time or part-time, and any effect of the injury upon such employment to support claims for lost earnings.
( e ) If the claimant is self-employed, written statements, or other evidence showing: ( 1 ) The amount of earnings actually lost, and
( 2 ) The Federal tax return, if filed, for the three previous years.
( f ) If the claim arises out of injuries to a person providing services to the claimant, statement of the cost necessarily incurred to replace the services to which claimant is entitled under law.
**Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 June 2012 —**

**Transports Schiocchet — Excursions v Council and Commission**

**(Case T-203/11)**

Non-contractual liability — Coach and bus services between Member States — Regulation (EEC) No 684/92 — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — None — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law

1.                     *Non-contractual liability — Conditions — Unlawfulness — Damage — Causal link — One of the conditions not satisfied — Claim
for compensation dismissed in its entirety (Art. 340, second para., TFEU) (see para. 27)*

2.                     *Non-contractual liability — Conditions — Legislative measure involving choices of economic policy — Sufficiently serious breach
of a higher rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Requirement of a clear and serious breach of the limits of the
wide discretion of the EU legislature (Art. 340, second para; TFEU) (see para. 28)*

3.                     *Non-contractual liability — Conditions — Omissions of EU institutions — Requirement that a legal duty to act be disregarded
(Art. 340, second para., TFEU) (see paras 37-40)*

4.                     *Non-contractual liability — Conditions — Legislative measure involving choices of economic policy — Sufficiently serious breach
of a higher rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Requirement of a clear and serious breach of the limits of the
wide discretion of the EU legislature — Late submission by the Commission of a legislative proposal in the area concerned —
No liability (Art. 340, second para., TFEU) (see paras 41, 42)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for compensation for the damage purportedly suffered by the applicant by reason of the application of the system laid down in Council Regulation (EEC) No 684/92 of 16 March 1992 on common rules for the international carriage of passengers by coach and bus (OJ 1992 L 74, p. 1). |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Transports Schiocchet — Excursions is ordered to pay the costs. |
EXHIBIT 99.16
 CONSENT OF EXPERT
   (a)
    
    under the headings The Nuclear Business  Reserves and Resources, The Nuclear
Business  Mining Properties  McArthur River, The Nuclear Business  Development
Projects  Cigar Lake and Interest of Experts in the Corporations Annual Information
Form for the year ended December 31, 2008 dated March 27, 2009 for the McArthur
River/Key Lake and the Cigar Lake properties; and(b)
    
    under the headings Our Mineral Reserves and Resources  Mineral Reserves and
Resources and Qualified Persons in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation for the year ended December 31, 2008 dated February
16, 2009 for the McArthur River/Key Lake and the Cigar Lake properties,
    /s/Charles (Chuck) R. EdwardsName:
    
    Charles (Chuck) R. Edwards, P. Eng.Title:
    
    Director, Metallurgy, AMEC
EX-10.1






EXHIBIT 10.1




2004 Bonuses & 2005 Base Salaries for Certain Executive Officers




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name and Principal Position(s) 1	 	2004 Bonus	 	2005 Base Salary
	David A. Dull
Vice President of Business Affairs,
General Counsel and Secretary
	 	$	55,000	 	 	$	250,000	 
	Bruce E. Kiddoo
Vice President and Corporate Controller
	 	 	40,000	 	 	 	220,000	 
	Vahid Manian
Vice President of Manufacturing Operations
	 	 	55,000	 	 	 	250,000	 
	Andrew J. Pease
Vice President of Worldwide Sales
	 	 	55,000	 	 	 	250,000	 
	William J. Ruehle
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	60,000	 	 	 	260,000	 







1 The Compensation Committee did not establish
the base salary of Scott A. McGregor, the Chief Executive Officer of the
company, on February 1, 2005 because the 2005 base salary of Mr. McGregor was
established when he joined Broadcom in January 2005. Since Mr. McGregor was not
employed by Broadcom during 2004, he did not receive a 2004 bonus.
#### Pamelia Turner, *Plaintiff, v.*Canal Railroad Company, *Defendan*t.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 9, 2016

No. 04-16-00060-CV

Maria Jilma URIBE and Jose Carlos Uribe,

Appellants

v.

CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC on behalf of Deutsche Bank National Trust 

Co., as Indenture Trustee for New Century Home Equity Loan Trust 2006-NC4 Asset-Backed 

Pass-Through Certificates,

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CI18492

Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This court granted Appellants’ and Appellees’ first joint motion for a forty-five day 

extension of time to file Appellants’ brief until June 6, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d). On 

June 3, 2016, Appellants and Appellees filed a second joint motion for extension of time to file 

their respective briefs. Appellants request an additional twenty-one days to file their brief. 

Appellees request a six-day extension of time to file their brief.

The joint motion is GRANTED. Appellants’ brief is due on June 27, 2016. NO 

FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANTS’ BRIEF WILL BE 

GRANTED. 

Appellees’ brief is due on August 2, 2016. See id. R. 38.6(b). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of June, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                 NANOPIERCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE




                                            2003         2002
                                        ------------  -----------
<S>                                     <C>           <C>
              Net loss                  $(4,017,785)  (4,729,072)
                                        ============  ===========

              Weighted average number
                of common shares
                outstanding              61,647,688   56,194,682

              Common equivalent shares
                representing shares
                issuable upon exercise
                of outstanding options
                and warrants                      -            -
                                        ------------  -----------
                                         61,647,688   56,194,682
                                        ============  ===========

              Net loss per share,
                basic and diluted
              Loss from continuing
                operations              $     (0.05)       (0.07)
                                        ============  ===========
              Loss from discontinued
                operations                    (0.02)       (0.01)
                                        ============  ===========
              Net loss per share,
                basic and diluted       $     (0.07)       (0.08)
                                        ============  ===========
</TABLE>


Stock  options,  warrants  and convertible preferred stock are not considered in
the  calculations  for  those  periods  with  net  losses  as  the impact of the
potential  common  shares  (approximately  at  17,167,710  June  30,  2003  and
10,882,661  shares  at  June  30, 2002) would be to decrease net loss per share.


<PAGE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending March 8, 2008

|Filer                      | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                              
|-------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------
|NARA BANK                  | * Branch       | Nara Bank, Los Angeles, California, to establish branch facilities at:  1) 55 Northern Boulevard, Greatneck, New York; and 2) 2025 Lemoine Avenue, Fort Lee, New Jersey. | Newspaper:03/21/2008Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                 | 03/21/2008    
|Federal Register:          | Not applicable
|OREGON PACIFIC BANKING CO. | * Branch       | Oregon Pacific Banking Company, Florence, Oregon, to establish a mobile branch courier service to serve the counties of Coos and Douglas, in the state of Oregon.        | Newspaper:03/14/2008Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                 | 03/14/2008    
|Federal Register:          | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending January 20, 2007

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification

The undersigned officer certifies that this report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Creative Vending Corp.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Creative Vending Corp. and
will be retained by Creative Vending Corp. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

February 27, 2006                    /s/ Dale B. Finfrock, Jr.
                                     --------------------------------------
                                     Dale B. Finfrock, Jr., Chief Executive
                                      Officer and Chief Financial Officer
98-2205.

#### State ex rel. Thomas v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.

In Prohibition. *Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                       EXHIBIT 24.1

                           POWER OF ATTORNEY                

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Steven J. Douglass, Ullrich E.
Porzig, and William J. Rainey, and each or any one of them acting alone,
as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of
substitution for him and in his name,  place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign  the Payless ShoeSource, Inc. Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 1997, and any amendments
thereto and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises to perfect and complete
such filing(s), as fully to all the intents and purposes as he might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute, may lawfully do or cause
to be done by virtue thereof.

     Dated this 17th  day of April, 1997.


                              /s/ Steven J. Douglass         
                              ---------------------------
                              Steven J. Douglass


                              /s/ Richard A. Jolosky         
                              ---------------------------
                              Richard A. Jolosky


                              /s/ Howard R. Fricke          
                              ---------------------------
                              Howard R. Fricke


                              /s/ Thomas A. Hays            
                              ---------------------------
                              Thomas A. Hays


                              /s/ Michael E. Murphy
                              ---------------------------
                              Michael E. Murphy


                              /s/ Robert L. Stark
                              ---------------------------
                              Robert L. Stark







<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF COMPUTER NETWORK
TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          10,357
<SECURITIES>                                     1,237
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,089
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,101
<INVENTORY>                                     17,242
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,701
<PP&E>                                          40,226
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  87,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,149
<BONDS>                                            543
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           221
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,841
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    87,754
<SALES>                                         69,906
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,642
<CGS>                                           22,935
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,607
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,905<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  66
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,850
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,812
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,038
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,038
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
<FN>
<F1>Amount Presented Represents Engineering and Development Expense.
<F2>Amount Presented Represents Basic Net Income (Loss) Per Share.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 08179

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 08179\08003_Checklist.xls

08179\08003_Completeness_Checklist.xls

08179\08179_ HardcopyLog.doc

x 08179\08179_PartA.xls

x 08179\08179_PartB.xls

x 08179\08179_PartC.xls

x 08179\08179_PartD.xls

x 08179\08179_PartE.xls

x 08179\08179_PartF.xls

x 08179\08179_PartG.xls

x 08179\08179_PartH.xls

08179\08179_ Certification Statement.pdf

x 08179\Supporting Documents\08179_Part E Corrections Email 2.pdf

x 08179\Supporting Documents\08179_Part E2-1 supplemental responses.pdf

x 08179\Supporting Documents\08179 Part E Corrections Email.pdf

08179\Supporting Documents\08179_Scherer Diagram C2-31-1.pdf

08179\Supporting Documents\08179_Scherer Diagram C2-31-2.pdf

08179\Supporting Documents\08179_Scherer Diagram C2-31-3.pdf

x 08179\Supporting Documents\08179_Scherer Diagram D-1.pdf

x 08179\Supporting Documents\08179_Scherer Diagram D-2.pdf

x 08179\Supporting Documents\08179_Scherer Diagram D-3.pdf

x 08179\Supporting Documents\08179_Scherer Diagram WB-1.pdf

08179\Supporting Documents\08179_Scherer Map-1.pdf

08179\Supporting Documents\08179_Scherer Map-2.pdf

08179\Supporting Documents\08179_Transmittal letter - Georgia Power.pdf

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1453

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny tax-exempt status

to organizations which promote the legalization of certain drugs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 6, 1995

Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny taxexempt status to organizations which promote the legalization of certain drugs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DENIAL OF TAX-EXEMPT STATUS TO ORGANIZA4 TIONS WHICH PROMOTE THE LEGALIZATION

5 OF CERTAIN DRUGS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 501 of the Internal Reve7 nue Code of 1986 (relating to exemption from tax on cor8 porations, certain trusts, etc.) is amended by redesignat9 ing subsection (n) as subsection (o) and by inserting after

10 subsection (m) the following new subsection:
2

•HR 1453 IH

1 ‘‘(n) ORGANIZATIONS PROMOTING LEGALIZATION OF

2 CERTAIN DRUGS NOT EXEMPT FROM TAX.—An organi3 zation shall not be exempt from tax under subsection (a)

4 if any portion of the activities of such organization con5 sists of promoting the legalization of any controlled sub6 stance, as defined in section 102(6) of the Controlled Sub7 stances Act (21 U.S.C. 802(6)).’’

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the

10 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ