alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019044EN.01005301.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/53

---

Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — Sky Deutschland and Sky Deutschland Fernsehen v Commission

(Case T-626/11) (1)

((State aid - German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying losses forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market - Annulment of the contested measure by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2019/C 44/67)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Sky Deutschland GmbH, formerly Sky Deutschland AG, (Unterföhring, Germany), and Sky Deutschland Fernsehen GmbH & Co. KG (Unterföhring) (represented by: initially, A. Cordewener, F. Kutt and C. Jehke, then, F. Kutt and C. Jehke, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche, M. Adam and M. Noll-Ehlers, then, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Noll-Ehlers and finally, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially T. Henze, K. Petersen and R. Kanitz, then, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and K. Stranz and finally, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and S. Eisenberg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel) (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 26).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

| 2. | The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by Sky Deutschland GmbH and Sky Deutschland Fernsehen GmbH & Co. KG; |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by Sky Deutschland GmbH and Sky Deutschland Fernsehen GmbH & Co. KG;

| 3. | The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 49, 18.2.2012.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           106072
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1446930
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                      541632
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                2288914
<PP&E>                                          9528290
<DEPRECIATION>                                  4305767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 12270407
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           4388860
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                      4292783
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   12270407
<SALES>                                        28643415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               28643415
<CGS>                                          21129265
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  25543687
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               667942
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2515162
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1021487
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1493675
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1493675
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.22
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JEFFREY LEBLANC,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 15-cv-12060

vs. HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

ROBERT G. COTTON FACILITY, 

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INJUNCTION [#9]

On June 12, 2015, this Court entered an Order Denying Plaintiff’s Application

to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Dismissing Complaint Without Prejudice. See Dkt.

No. 3. Plaintiff is a prolific filer who has been warned by at least one other judge in

this district that he is unable to proceed in forma pauperis in the civil rights actions

he continues to file pursuant to the “three strikes rule” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

After this Court dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal. 

See Dkt. No. 5. Thereafter, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Injunction, which is now

before the Court. See Dkt. No. 9. 

Plaintiff is not entitled to an injunction for the reasons articulated in this Court’s

-1-

2:15-cv-12060-GAD-MKM Doc # 11 Filed 08/04/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 32
Order Dismissing his Complaint. See Dkt. No. 3. Moreover, because a Notice of

Appeal has been filed, this Court is divested of jurisdiction to review Plaintiff’s

present motion. Taylor v. KeyCorp., 680 F.3d 609 (6th Cir. 2012) (“The filing of a

notice of appeal is an event of jurisdictional significance–it confers jurisdiction on the

court of appeals and divests the district court of its control over those aspects of the

case involved in the appeal.”).

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Injunction [#9] is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 4, 2015 /s/Gershwin A Drain 

GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

-2-

2:15-cv-12060-GAD-MKM Doc # 11 Filed 08/04/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 33
§ 42.15-30 Hatchways closed by weathertight covers of steel or other equivalent material fitted with gaskets and clamping devices. ( a ) *Hatchway coamings.* At positions 1 and 2 the height above the deck of hatchway coamings fitted with weathertight hatch covers of steel or other equivalent material fitted with gaskets and clamping devices shall be as specified in § 42.15-25(a)(1). The height of these coamings may be reduced, or the coamings omitted entirely, on condition that the assigning authority is satisfied that the safety of the vessel is not thereby impaired in any sea conditions. Where coamings are provided they shall be of substantial construction.
( b ) *Weathertight covers.* ( 1 ) Where weathertight covers are of mild steel the strength shall be calculated with assumed loads not less than 358 pounds per square foot on hatchways in position 1, and not less than 255 pounds per square foot on hatchways in position 2, and the product of the maximum stress thus calculated and the factor of 4.25 shall not exceed the minimum ultimate strength of the material. They shall be so designed as to limit the deflection to not more than 0.0028 times the span under these loads. Mild steel plating forming the tops of covers shall be not less in thickness than one percent of the spacing of stiffeners or 0.24 inches if that be greater. The provisions of § 42.15-25(b)(4) are applicable for vessels of not more than 328 feet in length.
( 2 ) The strength and stiffness of covers made of materials other than mild steel shall be equivalent to those of mild steel to the satisfaction of the assigning authority.
( c ) *Means for securing weathertightness.* ( 1 ) The means for securing and maintaining weathertightness shall be to the satisfaction of the assigning authority.
( 2 ) The arrangements shall ensure that the tightness can be maintained in any sea conditions. For this purpose tests for tightness shall be required at the initial surveys, and may be required at periodical surveys and at annual surveys or at more frequent intervals.
[CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10061, July 12, 1968, as amended by CGFR 68-126, 34 FR 9014, June 5, 1969]
§ 35.30-35 Spark producing devices—TB/ALL. ( a ) Where Grades A, B, C, and D liquid cargoes are involved, power driven or manually operated spark producing devices shall not be used in bulk cargo tanks, fuel oil tanks, cargo pumprooms, or enclosed spaces immediately above or adjacent to bulk cargo tanks unless all the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The compartment itself is gas-free;
( 2 ) The compartments adjacent and the compartments diagonally adjacent are either: ( i ) Gas-free;
( ii ) Inerted;
( iii ) Filled with water;
( iv ) Contain Grade E liquid and are closed and secured; or
( v ) Are spaces in which flammable vapors and gases normally are not expected to accumulate; and,
( 3 ) All other compartments of the vessel in which flammable vapors and gases may normally be expected to accumulate are closed and secured.
( b ) This section does not prohibit the use of small hand tools in such locations.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16704, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by USCG-2004-18884, 69 FR 58345, Sept. 30, 2004]
Order entered October 15, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00595
- CR
JAMES EDWARD GRUMBLE S, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MB10
- 69593
- B



### O RDER
The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether app ellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the
trial cou rt shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effecti ve representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending August 25, 2007

|Filer                            | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                                
|-------------------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|VIRGINIA COMMUNITY CAPITAL, INC. | 4c8* 3A1      | Virginia Community Capital, Inc., Christiansburg, Virginia, to become a bank holding company through the acquisition of 99% of the voting securities of Community Capital Bank of Virginia, Christiansburg, Virginia, an organizing bank. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                       | Not available
|Federal Register:                | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Forth Quarter of 2007 (October 1, 2007 - December 31, 2007)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 4.07-15 Recommendations, action on.

Where the recommendations of an investigating officer are such that their accomplishment is within the authority of the District Commander or any of the personnel under his command, immediate steps shall be taken to put them into effect and his forwarding endorsement shall so indicate.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

January 9, 2012

Nos. 09-3467, 09-3731 & 09-3965

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

CHRISTOPHER G. WRIGHT,

Appellant (No. 09-3467) 

RAVINDER S. CHAWLA,

Appellant (No. 09-3731) 

ANDREW TEITELMAN.

Appellant (No. 09-3965)

(E.D. Pa. No. 2-08-cr-00450-001/002/004)

Present: AMBRO, CHAGARES and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges

1. Motion by Appellee USA to Amend the Court’s Opinion dated January 04, 

2012; and

2. Letter Response by Appellant, Christopher G. Wright, in Opposition to 

Motion to Amend the Court’s Opinion dated January 04, 2012.

Respectfully,

Clerk/dwb

_______________________________ O R D E R ______________________________

The foregoing motion by Appellee to amend the Court’s Opinion dated January 4, 2012 

is denied. The letter response construed as a cross-motion by Appellant, Christopher G. 

Wright in opposition to the motion to amend is granted in part and denied in part. The 

opinion is amended as follows: on page 10, first full paragraph, lines 6-7, replace “with 

the intent” with “intending, in exchange for the benefits,”.

By the Court,

/s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge

Dated: February 7, 2012
Appeal Nos. 09-3467, 09-3731 & 09-3965

USA v. Christopher Wright, Ravinder Chawla and Andrew Teitelman

Page 2

DWB/cc:

Jennifer A. Williams, Esq. 

Lisa A. Mathewson, Esq. 

Michael J. Bresnick, Esq. 

Peter Goldberger, Esq. 

Ellen C. Brotman, Esq.
# C_2014078EN.01001801.xml

| 15.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/18

---

Order of the General Court of 27 January 2014 — Commission v OHIM — Ten ewiv (TEN)

(Case T-658/11) (1)

1

2014/C 78/35

Language of the case: German

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 31.3.2012.

1

---
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of the
                  Chief Financial Officer

I, H. Ravi Brar certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:
5. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;
6. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
7. disclosed in this report any change in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and
8. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
9. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
10. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have  a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls over financial reporting



Date:  May 12, 2004

/s/ H. Ravi Brar

_______________________________

H. Ravi Brar

Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 95 (Thursday, May 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27827-27828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2450]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Notice of Meeting

Chairpersons, Board of Scientific Counselors for Institutes and Centers 
at the National Institutes of Health

    Notice is hereby given of a meeting scheduled by the Deputy 
Director for Intramural Research at the National Institutes of Health 
(NIH) with the Chairpersons of the Boards of Scientific Counselors. The 
Boards of Scientific Counselors are advisory groups to the

[[Page 27828]]

Scientific Directors of the Intramural Research Programs at the NIH. 
This meeting will take place on June 11, 2007, from 10 a.m. to 3:30 
p.m., at the NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, Building 1, Wilson 
Hall. The meeting will include a discussion of policies and procedures 
that apply to the regular review of NIH intramural scientists and their 
work, with special emphasis on clinical research.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact Ms. Colleen Crone at the Office of 
Intramural Research, NIH, Building 1, Room 160, Telephone (301) 496-
1921 or FAX (301) 402-4273 in advance of the meeting.

    Dated: May 11, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2450 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Case 2:15-cv-12312-MOB-EAS ECF No. 56-14, PageID.1606 Filed 09/23/16 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:15-cv-12312-MOB-EAS ECF No. 56-14, PageID.1607 Filed 09/23/16 Page 2 of 2
Presidential Documents

29047 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 99 

Wednesday, May 23, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8146 of May 18, 2007 

National Hurricane Preparedness Week, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Each year, millions of Americans living in coastal areas are faced with 

the hazards of hurricanes. As hurricane season approaches, National Hurricane Preparedness Week provides an opportunity to raise awareness of steps 

that can be taken to help protect our citizens, and their communities and 

property. 

Hurricanes can be devastatingly powerful and include storm surge, high 

winds, tornadoes, and flooding. To reduce the potentially deadly effects 

of these storms, it is imperative for people in hurricane-prone areas to 

prepare for each type of hurricane hazard. Taking the time to develop 

a family disaster plan, create a disaster supply kit, and stay aware of current 

weather situations can improve preparedness and help save lives. 

My Administration is committed to strengthening our Nation’s ability to 

prepare for, respond to, and recover from these types of disasters. I’ve 

asked the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to find ways 

to provide better assistance to those affected by catastrophe. FEMA has 

enhanced coordination between all levels of government during times of 

crisis and, along with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 

is helping raise awareness about the dangers of hurricanes. In addition, 

the Department of Homeland Security and FEMA provide Americans with 

important emergency preparation checklists and valuable resources about 

what to do after a disaster at ready.gov and fema.gov. By working together, 

citizens and Federal, State, local, and tribal officials can help safeguard 

lives and protect property. 

Throughout the hurricane season, we are also grateful for the compassion, 

courage, and generosity of the volunteers and first responders who stand 

ready to help their neighbors in need. Their good hearts reflect the character 

of our Nation. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 20 through May 

26, 2007, as National Hurricane Preparedness Week. I call upon government 

agencies, private organizations, schools, and the media to share information 

about hurricane preparedness. I also urge all Americans living in vulnerable 

coastal areas of our Nation to take appropriate measures and precautions 

to protect themselves against the effects of hurricanes. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
29048 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 23, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighteenth day 

of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 07–2582 

Filed 5–22–07; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICESGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
#### C. Coles Dusenbury, *Respondent, v.*Mutual Union Telegraph Company, *Appellant.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt, JV;

Dykman, J., not sitting.