GARY R. HERBERT
Governor

GREG BELL
Lieutenant Governor



### July 23, 2013 

## Department of Environmental Quality

Amanda Smith
Executive Director

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY Bryce C. Bird

Director



### Shaun McGrath, Regional Administrator US EPA Region 8 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129

Dear Mr. McGrath: DAQP-045-13

Enclosed, please find for your review one hard copy and one electronic copy of the administrative
documentation in support of Governor Herbert's June 18, 2013, State Implementation Plan
submittal of Utah Air Quality Rule R307-401-15, Air Strippers and Soil Venting Projects. 

### Included in this submittal for your review is the demonstration required under section 110(1) of the Clean Air Act, Air Quality Impact of Changes Made to R307-401-15 Air Strippers and Soil Venting Projects in 1999 and the new rule R307-401-16 De minimis Emissions from Soil Aeration Projects that was adopted in 1999.

If 

### you have questions, you can reach me at (801) 536-4064. I look forward to working with you and your staff toward approval of this submittal.

Sincerely,

# ~~~>I Bryce C. Bird
Director

BCB:MB:svw

Enclosures

195 North 1950 West• Salt Lake City, UT Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 •Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820 Telephone (801) 536-4000 •Fax (801)536-4099 • T.D.D. (801) 536-4414 www.deq.utah.gov
Printed on I 00% recycled paperGARY R

. HERBERT

GOVERNOR 

## STATE 

# OF UTAH

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR

SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH

84114-2220



### June 18, 2013

Shaun McGrath, Regional Administrator US EPA Region 8
1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, Colorado 80202-1129

Dear Mr. McGrath: GREG BELL

LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR



### Enclosed for your approval are revisions to rule R307-401-15, Air Strippers and Soil Venting Projects. The rule was updated to refer to the most recent test methods and to allow

sources to use future updated federally-approved methods.

The Utah Division of Air Quality is submitting supporting documentation in both electronic and hard copy formats. The electronic and hard copy documents are exact duplicates. If you have questions about this request, you may call Bryce Bird, Director of the Utah Division of Air Quality, at (801) 536-4064 or bbird@utah.gov.

Enclosures Sincerely,

# ~ f4

# t.f,,._~ -IGary R. Herbert
Governor

# UTAH

Administrative Documentation

R307

- 401

- 15. Air Strippers and soil Venting Projects.

State of Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality 1 95 N. 1950 West P.O. Box 144820 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114

- 4820

801

- 536

- 4000



# July 1 6 , 2013

# UTAH

A DMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTATION 

# July 2013

# R307

- 401

- 15

A DMINISTRATIVE 

# D OCUMENTATION

Table of Contents

Legal Authority Utah Code Title 19, Chapter 2, Air Conservation Act

................................ ................................ .................... C

– 1 Utah Code Title 63 G

, Chapter 3 , Administrative Rulemaking Act

................................ ............................... C

– 21 Utah Administrative Code, R15, Administrative Rules

................................ ................................ ................. C

– 31

Proposed for Public Comment R307

- 401

- 15 3 : Text as Proposed

................................ ................................ ................................ ................ P

– 1 R307

- 303 : DAR Bulletin ( December 1, 2012 ) Rule Analysis Form, DAR # 37037

................................ ........ P

– 3 110(l) Demonstration

................................ ................................ ................................ ........................ P

– 6

Public Hearing s/Comments DAR Bulletin

– Notice of Public Hearing /Comment Period for 110(l) demonstration and R307

- 401

- 15

..... H

– 1 R307

- 401

- 15 : Summary of Public Comments

................................ ................................ ............................... H

–4

Nonsubstantive Change R307

- 401

- 15 : Nonsubstantive Change

................................ ................................ ................................ ..... NCS

– 1

Effective Rule R307

- 401

- 15 : Final Text

................................ ................................ ................................ ........................ E

– 1 R307

- 401

- 15 : DAR Bulletin ( March 1

, 2013 ) Effective Date Notice

................................ .............................. E

– 3 Final 110(l) Demonstration

................................ ................................ ................................ ........................ E

–4

Certification

# Codes

# Air Conservation Act

Utah Code

-- Title 19

-- Chapter 02 (July 13, 2012)

19 -2-101. Short title

-- Policy of state and purpose of chapter

-- Support of local and regional programs

– Provision of Coordinated State Programs.....................................................................................................2 19 -2- 102. Definitions ..............................................................................................................2 19 -2-103. Members of board

-- Appointment

-- Terms

-- Organization

-- Per diem and expenses.............................3 19 -2-104. Powers of board. ..........................................................................................................................................4 19 -2-105. Duties of board.........................................................................................................

......... ..........................6 19 -2-105.3. Clean fuel requirements for fleets. ...........................................................................................................7 19 -2-106. Rulemaking authority and procedure. .........................................................................................................8 19 -2-107. Executive secretary

-- Appointment

-- Powers. ..........................................................................................8 19 -2-108. Notice of construction or modification of installations required

-- Authority of executive secretary to prohibit construction

-- Hearings

-- Limitations on authority of board

-- Inspections authorized.................................9 19 -2-109. Air quality standards

-- He arings on adoption

-- Orders of executive secretary

-- Adoption of emission control requirements. ...................................................................................................................................................10 19 -2- 10 9.1. Operating permit required

-- Emissions fee

-- Implementation. ............................................................. 11 19 -2-109.2. Small business assistance program. ......................................................................................................... 12 19 -2-109.3. Public access to information. ................................................................................................................... 13 19 -2-109.5. Private sector air quality permitting professionals certification program................................................. 13 19 -2-110. Violations

-- Notice to violator

-- Corrective action orders

-- Conference, conciliation, and persuasion by board

-- Hearings......................................................................................................................................................... 14 19 -2-112. Generalized condition of air pollution creating emergency

-- Sources causing imminent danger to health

-- Powers of executive director

-- Declaration of emergency. ..................................................................................... 14 19 -2-113. Variances

-- Judicial review...................................................................................................................... 14 19 -2-114. Activities not in violation of chapter or rules............................................................................................ 16 19 -2-115. Violations

-- Penalties

-- Reimbursement for expenses. ........................................................................... 16 19 -2-116. Injunction or other remedies to prevent violations

-- Civil actions not abridged. ..................................... 17 19 -2-117. Attorney general as legal advisor to board

-- Duties of attorney general and county attorneys................ 18 19 -2-118. Violation of injunction evidence of contempt........................................................................................... 18 19 -2-119. Civil or criminal remedies not excluded

-- Actionable rights under chapter

-- No liability for acts of God or other catastrophes.................................................................................................................................................... 18 19 -2-120. Information required of owners or operators of air contaminant sources. ................................................ 18 19 -2-121. Ordinances of political subdivisions authorized........................................................................................ 18 19-2-122. Cooperative agreements between political subdivisions and department. ................................................ 18 19 -2-123. Tax relief to encourage investment in facilities

-- Sales and use tax exemption.....................................

.. 19 19 -2-124. Application for certification of pollution control facility

-- Refunds

-- Interest. ...................................... 19 19 -2-125. Action on application for certification. ..................................................................................................... 20 19 -2-126. Revocation of certification

-- Grounds

-- Procedure................................................................................. 20 19 -2-127. Rules for administering certification for tax relief.................................................................................... 20

# Title 19. Environmental

Quality Code. Chapter 2. Air Conservation Act.

19-2-101. Short title

-- Policy of state and purpose of chapter

-- Support of local and regional programs

-- Provision of coordinated statewide program. (1) This chapter is known as the "Air Conservation Act." (2) It is the policy of this state and the purpose of this chapter to achieve and maintain levels of air quality which will protect human health and safety, and to the greatest degree practicable, prevent injury to plant and animal life and property, foster the comfort and convenience of the people, promote the economic and social development of this state, and facilitate the enjoyment of the natural attractions of this state. (3) Local and regional air pollution control programs shall be supported to the extent practicable as essential instruments to secure and maintain appropriate levels of air quality. (4) The purpose of this chapter is to: (a) provide for a coordinated statewide program of air pollution prevention, abatement, and control; (b) provide for an appropriate distribution of responsibilities among the state and local units of government; (c) facilitate cooperation across jurisdictional lines in dealing with problems of air pollution not confined within single jurisdictions; and (d) provide a framework within which air quality may be protected and consideration given to the public interest at all levels of planning and development within the state.

19-2-102. Definitions. As used in this chapter: (1) "Air contaminant" means any particulate matter or any gas, vapor, suspended solid, or any combination of them, excluding steam and water vapors. (2) "Air contaminant source" means all sources of emission of air contaminants whether privately or publicly owned or operated. (3) "Air pollution" means the presence in the ambient air of one or more air contaminants in the quantities and duration and under conditions and circumstances as is or tends to be injurious to human health or welfare, animal or plant life, or property, or would unreasonably interfere with the enjoyment of life or use of property, as determined by the rules adopted by the board. (4) "Ambient air" means the surrounding or outside air. (5) "Asbestos" means the asbestiform varieties of serpentine (chrysotile), riebeckite (crocidolite), cummingtonite-grunerite, anthophyllite, and actinolite-tremolite. (6) "Asbestos-containing material" means any material containing more than 1% asbestos, as determined using the method adopted in 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M, National Emission Standard for Asbestos. (7) "Asbestos inspection" means an activity undertaken to determine the presence or location, or to assess the condition of, asbestos-containing material or suspected asbestos-containing material, whether by visual or physical examination, or by taking samples of the material. (8) (a) "Board" means the Air Quality Board. (b) "Board" means, as used in Sections 19-2-123 through 19-2-126, the Air Quality Board or the Water Quality Board. (9) "Clean school bus" has the same meaning as defined in 42 U.S.C. Sec. 16091. (10) "Director" means the director of the Division of Air Quality. (11) "Division" means the Division of Air Quality, created in Subsection 19-1-105(1)(a). (12) (a) "Facility" means machinery, equipment, structures, or any part or accessories of them, installed or acquired for the primary purpose of controlling or disposing of air pollution. (b) "Facility" does not include an air conditioner, fan, or other similar facility for the comfort of personnel.

### (13) "Friable asbestos-containing

material" means any material containing more than 1% asbestos, as determined using the method adopted in 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M, National Emission Standard for Asbestos, that hand pressure can crumble, pulverize, or reduce to powder when dry. (14) "Indirect source" means a facility, building, structure, or installation which attracts or may attract mobile source activity that results in emissions of a pollutant for which there is a national standard. (15) (a) "Pollution control facility" or "facility" means, as used in Sections 19-2-123 through 19-2-126, any land, structure, building, installation, excavation, machinery, equipment, or device, or any addition to, reconstruction, replacement or improvement of, land or an existing structure, building, installation, excavation, machinery, equipment, or device reasonably used, erected, constructed, acquired, or installed by any person if the primary purpose of the use, erection, construction, acquisition, or installation is the prevention, control, or reduction of air or water pollution by:

(i) the disposal or elimination of or redesign to eliminate waste and the use of treatment works for industrial waste as defined in Title 19, Chapter 5, Water Quality Act; or (ii) the disposal, elimination, or reduction of or redesign to eliminate or reduce air contaminants or air pollution or air contamination sources and the use of air cleaning devices. (b) "Pollution control facility" or "facility" does not include air conditioners, septic tanks, or other facilities for human waste, nor any property installed, constructed, or used for the moving of sewage to the collection facilities of a public or quasi-public sewerage system.

19-2-103. Members of board

-- Appointment

-- Terms

-- Organization

-- Per diem and

expenses. (1) The board consists of the following nine members: (a) the following non-voting member, except that the member may vote to break a tie vote between the voting members: (i) the executive director; or (ii) an employee of the department designated by the executive director; and (b) the following eight voting members, who shall be appointed by the governor with the consent of the Senate: (i) one representative who: (A) is not connected with industry; (B) is an expert in air quality matters; and (C) is a Utah-licensed physician, a Utah-licensed professional engineer, or a scientist with relevant training and experience; (ii) two government representatives who do not represent the federal government; (iii) one representative from the mining industry; (iv) one representative from the fuels industry; (v) one representative from the manufacturing industry; (vi) one representative from the public who represents: (A) an environmental nongovernmental organization; or (B) a nongovernmental organization that represents community interests and does not represent industry interests; and (vii) one representative from the public who is trained and experienced in public health. (2) A member of the board shall: (a) be knowledgeable about air pollution matters, as evidenced by a professional degree, a professional accreditation, or documented experience; (b) be a resident of Utah; (c ) attend board meetings in accordance with the attendance rules made by the department under Subsection 19-1-201(1)(d)(i)(A); and (d) comply with all applicable statutes, rules, and policies, including the conflict of interest rules made by the department under Subsection 19-1-201(1)(d)(i)(B). (3) No more than five of the appointed members of the board shall belong to the same political party. (4) A majority of the members of the board may not derive any significant portion of their income from persons subject to permits or

### orders under this chapter.

(5) (a) Members shall be appointed for a term of four years. (b) Notwithstanding the requirements of Subsection (5)(a), the governor shall, at the time of appointment or reappointment, adjust the length of terms to ensure that the terms of board members are staggered so that half of the appointed board is appointed every two years. (c) (i) Notwithstanding Subsection (5)(a), the term of a board member who is appointed before March 1, 2013, shall expire on February 28, 2013. (ii) On March 1, 2013, the governor shall appoint or reappoint board members in accordance with this section. (6) A member may serve more than one

term. (7) A member shall hold office until the expiration of the member's term and until the member's successor is appointed, but not more than 90 days after the expiration of the member's

term. (8) When a vacancy occurs in the membership for any reason, the replacement shall be appointed for the unexpired term. (9) The board shall elect annually a chair and a vice chair from its members. (10) (a) The board shall meet at least quarterly. (b) Special meetings may be called by the chair upon the chair's own initiative, upon the request of the director, or upon the request of three members of the board. (c) Three days' notice shall be given to each member of the board before any meeting. (11) Five members constitute a quorum at any meeting, and the action of a majority of members present is the action of the board. (12) A member may not receive compensation or benefits for the member's service, but may receive per diem and travel expenses in accordance with: (a) Section 63A-3-106; (b) Section 63A-3-107; and (c) rules made by the Division of Finance pursuant to Sections 63A-3-106 and 63A-3-107.

19-2-104. Powers of board. (1) The board may make rules in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act: (a) regarding the control, abatement, and prevention of air pollution from all sources and the establishment of the maximum quantity of air contaminants that may be emitted by any air contaminant source; (b) establishing air quality standards; (c) requiring persons engaged in operations which result in air pollution to: (i) install, maintain, and use emissio n monitoring devices, as the board finds

necessary; (ii) file periodic reports containing information relating to the rate, period of emission, and composition of the air contaminant; and (iii) provide access to records relating to emissions which cause or contribute to air pollution; (d) (i) implementing: (A) Toxic Substances Control Act, Subchapter II, Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response, 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.; (B) 40 C.F.R. Part 763, Asbestos; and (C) 40 C.F.R. Part 61, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, Subpart M, National Emission Standard for Asbestos; and (ii) reviewing and approving asbestos management plans submitted by local education agencies under the Toxic Substances Control Act, Subchapter II, Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response, 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.; (e) establishing a requirement for a diesel emission opacity inspection and maintenance program for diesel-powered motor vehicles; (f) implementing an operating permit program as required by and in conformity with Titles IV and V of the federal Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990; (g) establishing requirements for county emissions inspection and maintenance programs after obtaining agreement from the counties that would be affected by the requirements; (h) with the approval of the governor, implementing in air quality nonattainment areas employer-based trip reduction programs applicable to businesses having more than 100

### employees at a single location and applicable to

federal, state, and local governments to the extent necessary to attain and maintain ambient air quality standards consistent with the state implementation plan and federal requirements under the standards set forth in Subsection (2); and (i) implementing lead-based paint remediation training, certification, and performance requirements in accordance with 15 U.S.C.A. 2601 et seq., Toxic Substances Control Act, Subchapter IV

-- Lead Exposure Reduction, Sections 402 and 406. (2) When implementing Subsection (1)(h) the board shall take into consideration: (a) the impact of the business on overall air quality; and (b) the need of the business to use automobiles in order to carry out its business

purposes. (3) (a) The board may: (i) hold a hearing that is not an adjudicative proceeding relating to any aspect of, or matter in, the administration of this chapter;

(ii) order the director to: (A) issue orders necessary to enforce the provisions of this chapter; (B) enforce the orders by appropriate administrative and judicial proceedings; or (C) institute judicial proceedings to secure compliance with this chapter; or (iii) advise, consult, contract, and cooperate with other agencies of the state, local governments, industries, other states, interstate or interlocal agencies, the federal government, or interested persons or groups. (b) The board shall: (i) to ensure compliance with applicable statutes and regulations: (A) review a settlement negotiated by the director in accordance with Subsection 19-2-107(2)(b)(viii) that requires a civil penalty of $25,000 or more; and (B) approve or disapprove the settlement; (ii) encourage voluntary cooperation by persons and affected groups to achieve the purposes of this chapter; (iii) require the owner and operator of each new source which directly emits or has the potential to emit 100 tons per year or more of any air contaminant or the owner or operator of each existing source which by modification will increase emissions or have the potential of increasing emissions by 100 tons per year or more of any air contaminant, to pay a fee sufficient to cover the reasonable costs of: (A) reviewing and acting upon the notice required under Section 19-2-108; and (B) implementing and enforcing requirements placed on the sources by any approval order issued pursuant to notice, not including any court costs associated with any enforcement action; (iv) meet the requirements of federal air pollution laws; (v) by rule, establish work practice, certification, and clearance air sampling requirements for persons who: (A) contract for hire to conduct demolition, renovation, salvage, encapsulation work involving friable asbestos-containing materials, or asbestos inspections if: (I) the contract work is done on a site other than a residential property with four or fewer units; or (II) the contract work is done on a residential property with four or fewer units where a tested sample contained greater than 1% of asbestos; (B) conduct work described in Subsection (3)(b)(v)(A) in areas to which th e general public has unrestrained access or in school buildings that are subject to the federal Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act of 1986; (C) conduct asbestos inspections in facilities subject to 15 U.S.C.A. 2601 et seq., Toxic Substances Control Act, Subchapter II - Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response; or (D) conduct lead paint inspections in facilities subject to 15 U.S.C.A. 2601 et seq., Toxic Substances Control Act, Subchapter IV

-- Lead Exposure Reduction; (vi) establish certification requirements for persons required under 15 U.S.C.A. 2601 et seq., Toxic Substances Control Act, Subchapter
II - Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response, to be accredited as inspectors, management planners, abatement project designers, asbestos abatement

### contractors and supervisors, or asbestos abatement workers;

(vii) establish certification requirements for asbestos project monitors, which shall provide for experience-based certification of persons who, prior to establishment of the certification requirements, had received relevant asbestos training, as defined by rule, and had acquired at least 1,000 hours of experience as project monitors; (viii) establish certification procedures and requirements for certification of the conversion of a motor vehicle to a clean-fuel vehicle, certifying the vehicle is eligible for the tax credit granted in Section 59-7-605 or 59-10-1009; (ix) establish a program to certify private sector air quality permitting professionals (AQPP), as described in Section 19-2-109.5; (x) establish certification requirements for persons required under 15 U.S.C.A. 2601 et seq., Toxic Control Act, Subchapter IV

-- Lead Exposure Reduction, to be accredited as inspectors, risk assessors, supervisors, project designers, or abatement workers; and (xi) assist the State Board of Education in adopting school bus idling reduction standards and implementing an idling reduction program in accordance with Section 41-6a-1308. (4) Any rules adopted under this chapter shall be consistent with provisions of federal laws, if any, relating to control of motor vehicles or motor vehicle emissions. (5) Nothing in this chapter authorizes the board to require installation of or payment for any monitoring equipment by the owner or operator of a source if the owner or operator has installed or is operating monitoring equipment that is equivalent to equipment which the board would require under this section. (6) (a) The board may not require testing for asbestos or related materials on a residential property with four or fewer units, unless: (i) the property's construction was completed before January 1, 1981; or (ii) the testing is for: (A) a sprayed acoustical ceiling; (B) transite siding; (C) vinyl floor tile; (D) thermal-system insulation or tape on a duct or furnace; or (E) vermiculite type insulation materials. (b) A residential property with four or fewer units is subject to an abatement rule made under Subsection (1) or (3)(b)(v) if: (i) a sample from the property is tested for asbestos; and (ii) the sample contains asbestos measuring greater than 1%. (7) The board may not issue, amend, renew, modify, revoke, or terminate any of the following that are subject to the authority granted to the director under Section 19-2-107 or 19-2-108: (a ) a permit; (b) a license; (c) a registration; (d) a certification; or (e) another administrative authorization made by the director. (8) A board member may not speak or act for the board unless the board member is authorized by a majority of a quorum of the board in a vote taken at a meeting of the board. (9) Notwithstanding Subsection (7), the board may exercise all authority granted to the board by a federally enforceable state implementation plan.

19-2-105. Duties of board. The board, in conjunction with the governing body of each county identified in Section 41-6a-1643 and other interested parties, shall order the director to perform an evaluation of the inspection and maintenance program developed under Section 41-6a-1643 including issues relating to: (1) the implementation of a standardized inspection and maintenance

program; (2) out-of-state registration of vehicles used in Utah; (3) out-of-county registration of vehicles used within the areas required to have an inspection and maintenance program; (4) use of the farm truck exemption; (5) mechanic training programs; (6) emissions standards; and

### (7) emissions waivers.

19-2-105.3. Clean fuel requirements for fleets. (1) As used in this section: (a) "1990 Clean Air Act" means the federal Clean Air Act as amended in 1990.

(b) "Clean fuel" means: (i) propane, compressed natural gas, or electricity; (ii) other fuel the Air Quality Board created in Title 19, Chapter 2, Air Conservation Act, determines annually on or before July 1 is at least as effective as fuels under Subsection (1)(b)(i) in reducing air pollution; and (iii) other fuel that meets the clean fuel vehicle standards in the 1990 Clean Air Act. (c) "Fleet" means ten or more vehicles: (i) owned or operated by a single entity as defined by board rule; and (ii) capable of being fueled or that are fueled at a central location. (d) "Fleet" does not include motor vehicles that are: (i) held for lease or rental to the general public; (ii) held for sale or used as demonstration vehicle by motor vehicle dealers; (iii) used by motor vehicle manufacturers for product evaluations or tests; (iv) authorized emergency vehicles as defined in Section 41-6a-102; (v) registered under Title 41, Chapter 1a, Part 2, Registration, as farm vehicles; (vi) special mobile equipment as defined in Section 41-1a-102; (vii) heavy duty trucks with a gross vehicle weight rating of more than 26,000 pounds; (viii) regularly used by employees to drive to and from work, parked at the employees' personal residences when they are not at their employment, and not practicably fueled at a central location; (ix) owned, operated, or leased by public transit districts; or (x) exempted by board rule. (2) (a) After evaluation of reasonably available pollution control strategies, and as part of the state implementation plan demonstrating attainment of the national ambient air quality standards, the board may by rule, subject to Subsection (2)(c), require fleets in specified geographical areas to use clean fuels if the board determines fleet use of clean fuels is: (i) necessary to demonstrate attainment of the national ambient air quality standards in any area where they are required; and (ii) reasonably cost effective when compared to other similarly beneficial control strategies for demonstrating attainment of the national ambient air quality standards. (b) State implementation plans developed prior to July 1, 1995, may require fleets to use clean fuels no earlier than July 1, 1995, unless the board determines fleet use of clean fuels is necessary prior to July 1, 1995, to demonstrate attainment of the national ambient air quality standards in any area by an attainment date established by federal law. (c) The board may not require more than 50% of those trucks in a fleet that are heavy duty trucks having a gross vehicle weight rating of more than 8,500 pounds and not more than 26,000 pounds to convert to clean fuels under Subsection (2)(b). (3) (a) After evaluation of reasonabl y available pollution control strategies, and as part of a state implementation plan demonstrating only maintenance of the national ambient air quality standards, the board may by rule, subject to Subsection (3)(b), require fleets in specified geographical areas to use clean fuels if the board determines fleet use of clean fuels is: (i) necessary to demonstrate maintenance of the national ambient air quality standards in any area where they are required; and (ii) reasonably cost effective as compared with other similarly beneficial control strategies for demonstrating maintenance of the national ambient air quality standards. (b) Under Subsection (3)(a) the board may require no more than: (i) 30% of a fleet to use clean fuels before January 1, 1998; (ii) 50% of a fleet to use clean fuels before January 1, 1999; and (iii) 70% of a fleet to use clean fuels

### before January 1, 2000.

(c) The board may not require more than 50% of those trucks in a fleet that are heavy duty trucks having a gross vehicle weight rating of more than 8,500 pounds and not more than 26,000 pounds to convert to clean fuels under Subsection (3)(b). (4) Rules the board makes under this section may include: (a) dates by which fleets are required to convert to clean fuels under the provisions of this section; (b) definitions of fleet owners or operators; (c) definitions of vehicles exempted from this section by rule; (d) certification requirements for persons who install clean fuel conversion equipment, including testing and certification standards regarding installers; and (e) certification fees for installers, established under Section 63 -38-3.2. (5) Implementation of this section and rules made under this section are subject to the reasonable availability of clean fuel in the local market as determined by the board.

19-2-106. Rulemaking authority and procedure. (1) Except as provided in Subsection (2), no rule which the board makes for the purpose of administering a program under the federal Clean Air Act may be more stringent than the corresponding federal regulations which address the same circumstances. In making rules, the board may incorporate by reference corresponding federal regulations. (2) The board may make rules more stringent than corresponding federal regulations for the purpose described in Subsection (1), only if it makes a written finding after public comment and hearing and based on evidence in the record, that corresponding federal regulations are not adequate to protect public health and the environment of the state. Those findings shall be accompanied by an opinion referring to and evaluating the public health and environmental information and studies contained in the record which form the basis for the board's conclusion. 19-2-107. Director

-- Appointment

-- Powers.

(1) The executive director shall appoint the director. The director shall serve under the administrative direction of the executive director. (2) (a) The director shall: (i) prepare and develop comprehensive plans for the prevention, abatement, and control of air pollution in Utah; (ii) advise, consult, and cooperate with other agencies of the state, the federal government, other states and interstate agencies, and affected groups, political subdivisions, and industries in furtherance of the purposes of this chapter; (iii) review plans, specifications, or other data relative to pollution control systems or any part of the systems provided in this chapter; (iv) under the direction of the executive director, represent the state in all matters relating to interstate air pollution, including interstate compacts and similar agreements; (v) secure necessary scientific, technical, administrative, and operational services, including laboratory facilities, by contract or otherwis e; (vi) encourage voluntary cooperation by persons and affected groups to achieve the purposes of this chapter; (vii) encourage local units of government to handle air pollution within their respective jurisdictions on a cooperative basis and provide technical and consulting assistance to them; (viii) determine by means of field studies and sampling the degree of air contamination and air pollution in all parts of the state; (ix) monitor the effects of the emission of air contaminants from motor vehicles on the quality of the outdoor atmosphere in all parts of Utah and take appropriate responsive action; (x) collect and disseminate information relating to air contamination and air pollution and conduct educational and training programs relating to air contamination and air pollution; (xi) assess and collect noncompliance

### penalties as required in Section 120 of the

federal Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 7420; (xii) comply with the requirements of federal air pollution laws; (xiii) subject to the provisions of this chapter, enforce rules through the issuance of orders, including: (A) prohibiting or abating discharges of wastes affecting ambient air; (B) requiring the construction of new control facilities or any parts of new control facilities or the modification, extension, or alteration of existing control facilities or any parts of new control facilities; or (C) adopting other remedial measures to prevent, control, or abate air pollution; and (xiv) as authorized by the board and subject to the provisions of this chapter, act as executive secretary of the board under the direction of the chairman of the board. (b) The director may: (i) employ full-time employees necessary to carry out this chapter; (ii) subject to the provisions of this chapter, authorize any employee or representative of the department to enter at reasonable time and upon reasonable notice in or upon public or private property for the purposes of inspecting and investigating conditions and plant records concerning possible air pollution; (iii) encourage, participate in, or conduct studies, investigations, research, and demonstrations relating to air pollution and its causes, effects, prevention, abatement, and control, as advisable and necessary for the discharge of duties assigned under this chapter, including the establishment of inventories of pollution sources; (iv) collect and disseminate information relating to air pollution and the prevention, control, and abatement of it; (v) cooperate with studies and research relating to air pollution and its control, abatement, and prevention; (vi) subject to Subsection (3), upon request, consult concerning the following with any person proposing to construct, install, or otherwise acquire an air contaminant source in Utah: (A) the efficacy of any proposed control device or proposed control system for the

source; or (B) the air pollution problem that may be related to the source, device, or system; (vii) accept, receive, and administer grants or other funds or gifts from public and private agencies, including the federal government, for the purpose of carrying out any of the functions of this chapter; (viii) subject to Subsection 19-2-104(3)(b)(i), settle or compromise any civil action initiated by the division to compel compliance with this chapter or the rules made under this chapter; or (ix) as authorized by the board and subject to the provisions of this chapter, exercise all incidental powers necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter, including certification to any state or federal authorities for tax purposes the fact of construction, installation, or acquisition of any facility, land, building, machinery, or equipment or any part of them, in conformity with this chapter. (3) A consultation described in Subsection (2)(b)(vi) does not relieve a person from the requirements of this chapter, the rules adopted under this chapter, or any other provision of law.

19-2-108. Notice of construction or modification of installations required

-- Authority of director to prohibit construction

-- Hearings

-- Limitations on authority of director

-- Inspections authorized. (1) Notice shall be given to the director by any person planning to construct a new installation which will or might reasonably be expected to be a source or indirect source of air pollution or to make modifications to an existing installation which will or might reasonably be expected to increase the amount of or change the character or effect of air contaminants discharged, so that the installation may be expected to be a source or indirect source of air pollution, or by any person planning to install an air cleaning device or other equipment intended to control emission of air contaminants. (2) (a) (i) The director may require, as a condition precedent to the construction, modification, installation, or establishment of

### the air contaminant source or indirect source, the

submission of plans, specifications, and other information as he finds necessary to determine whether the proposed construction, modification, installation, or establishment will be in accord with applicable rules in force under this chapter. (ii) Plan approval for an indirect source may be delegated by the director to a local authority when requested and upon assurance that the local authority has and will maintain sufficient expertise to insure that the planned installation will meet the requirements established by law. (b) If within 90 days after the receipt of plans, specifications, or other information required under this subsection, the director determines that the proposed construction, installation, or establishment or any part of it will not be in accord with the requirements of this chapter or applicable rules or that further time, not exceeding three extensions of 30 days each, is required by the director to adequately review the plans, specifications, or other information, he shall issue an order prohibiting the construction, installation, or establishment of the air contaminant source or sources in whole or in part. (3) In addition to any other remedies, any person aggrieved by the issuance of an order either granting or denying a request for the construction of a new installation, and prior to invoking any such other remedies shall, upon request, in accordance with the rules of the department, be entitled to a permit review adjudicative proceeding conducted by an administrative law judge as provided by Section 19-1-301.5. (4) Any features, machines, and devices constituting parts of or called for by plans, specifications, or other information submitted under Subsection (1) shall be maintained in good working order. (5) This section does not authorize the director to require the use of machinery, devices, or equipment from a particular supplier or produced by a particular manufacturer if the required performance standards may be met by machinery, devices, or equipment otherwise available. (6) (a) Any authorized officer, employee, or representative of the director may enter and inspect any property, premise, or place on or at which an air contaminant source is located or is being constructed, modified, installed, or established at any reasonable time for the purpose of ascertaining the state of compliance with this chapter and the rules adopted under it. (b) (i) A person may not refuse entry or access to any authorized representative of the director who requests entry for purposes of inspection and who presents appropriate credentials. (ii) A person may not obstruct, hamper, or interfere with any inspection. (c) If requested, the owner or operator of the premises shall receive a report setting forth all facts found which relate to compliance

status.

19-2-109. Air quality standards

-- Hearings on adoption

-- Orders of director

-- Adoption of emission control requirements. (1) (a) The board, in adopting standards of quality for ambient air, shall conduct public hearings. (b) Notice of any public hearing for the consideration, adoption, or amendment of air quality standards shall specify the locations to which the proposed standards apply and the time, date, and place of the hearing. (c) The notice shall be: (i) (A) published at least twice in any newspaper of general circulation in the area affected; and (B) published on the Utah Public Notice Website created in Section 63F-1-701, at least 20 days before the public hearing; and (ii) mailed at least 20 days before the public hearing to the chief executive of each political subdivision of the area affected and to other persons the director has reason to believe will be affected by the standards. (d) The adoption of air quality standards or any modification or changes to air quality standards shall be by order of the director following formal action of the board with respect to the standards. (e) The order shall be published:

### (i) in a newspaper of general circulation

in the area affected; and (ii) as required in Section 45-1-101. (2) (a) The board may establish emission control requirements by rule that in its judgment may be necessary to prevent, abate, or control air pollution that may be statewide or may vary from area to area, taking into account varying local conditions. (b) In adopting these requirements, the board shall give notice and conduct public hearings in accordance with the requirements in Subsection (1).

19-2-109.1. Operating permit required

-- Emissions fee

-- Implementation. (1) As used in this section and Sections 19-2-109.2 and 19-2-109.3: (a) "EPA" means the federal Environmental Protection Agency. (b) "1990 Clean Air Act" means the federal Clean Air Act as amended in 1990. (c) "Operating permit" means a permit issued by the director to sources of air pollution that meet the requirements of Titles IV and V of the 1990 Clean Air Act. (d) "Program" means the air pollution operating permit program established under this section to comply with Title V of the 1990 Clean Air Act. (e) "Regulated pollutant" has the same meaning as defined in Title V of the 1990 Clean Air Act and implementing federal regulations. (2) (a) A person may not operate any source of air pollution required to have a permit under Title V of the 1990 Clean Air Act without having obtained an operating permit from the director under procedures the board establishes by rule. (b) A person is not required to submit an operating permit application until the governor has submitted an operating permit program to the EPA. (c) Any operating permit issued under this section may not become effective until the day after the EPA issues approval of the permit program or November 15, 1995, whichever occurs first. (3) (a) Operating permits issued under this section shall be for a period of five years unless the director makes a written finding, after public comment and hearing, and based on substantial evidence in the record, that an operating permit term of less than five years is necessary to protect the public health and the environment of the state. (b) The director may issue, modify, or renew an operating permit only after providing public notice, an opportunity for public comment, and an opportunity for a public hearing. (c) The director shall, in conformity with the 1990 Clean Air Act and implementing federal regulations, revise the conditions of issued operating permits to incorporate applicable federal regulations in conformity with Section 502(b)(9) of the 1990 Clean Air Act, if the remaining period of the permit is three or

more years. (d) The director may terminate, modify, revoke, or reissue an operating permit for cause. (4) (a) The board shall establish a proposed annual emissions fee that conforms with Title V of the 1990 Clean Air Act for each ton of regulated pollutant, applicable to all sources required to obtain a permit. The emissions fee established under this section is in addition to fees assessed under Section 19-2-108 for issuance of an approval order. (b) In establishing the fee the board shall comply with the provisions of Section 63J-1-504 that require a public hearing and require the established fee to be submitted to the Legislature for its approval as part of the department's annual appropriations request. (c) The fee shall cover all reasonable direct and indirect costs required to develop and administer the program and the small business assistance program established under Section 19-2-109.2. The director shall prepare an annual report of the emissions fees collected and the costs covered by those fees under this Subsection (4). (d) The fee shall be established uniformly for all sources required to obtain an operating permit under the program and for all regulated pollutants. (e) The fee may not be assessed for emissions of any regulated pollutant if the emissions are already accounted for within the

### emissions of another regulated pollutant.

(f) An emissions fee may not be assessed for any amount of a regulated pollutant emitted by any source in excess of 4,000 tons per year of that regulated pollutant. (5) Emissions fees accrued on and after July 1, 1993, but before issuance of an operating permit, shall be based on the most recent emissions inventory, unless a source elects before July 1, 1992, to base the fee on allowable emissions, if applicable for a regulated pollutant. (6) After an operating permit is issued the emissions fee shall be based on actual emissions for a regulated pollutant unless a source elects, prior to the issuance or renewal of a permit, to base the fee during the period of the permit on allowable emissions for that regulated pollutant. (7) If the owner or operator of a source subject to this section fails to timely pay an annual emissions fee, the director may: (a) impose a penalty of not more than 50% of the fee, in addition to the fee, plus interest on the fee computed at 12% annually; or (b) revoke the operating permit. (8) The owner or operator of a source subject to this section may contest an emissions fee assessment or associated penalty in an adjudicative hearing under the Title 63G, Chapter 4, Administrative Procedures Act, and Section 19-1-301, as provided in this Subsection (8). (a) The owner or operator shall pay the fee under protest prior to being entitled to a hearing. Payment of an emissions fee or penalty under protest is not a waiver of the right to contest the fee or penalty under this section. (b) A request for a hearing under this Subsection (8) shall be made after payment of the emissions fee and within six months after the emissions fee was due. (9) To reinstate an operating permit revoked under Subsection (7) the owner or operator shall pay all outstanding emissions fees, a penalty of not more than 50% of all outstanding fees, and interest on the outstanding emissions fees computed at 12% annually. (10) All emissions fees and penalties collected by the department under this section shall be deposited in the General Fund as the Air Pollution Operating Permit Program dedicated credit to be used solely to pay for the reasonable direct and indirect costs incurred by the department in developing and administering the program and the small business assistance program under Section 19-2-109.2. (11) Failure of the director to act on any operating permit application or renewal is a final administrative action only for the purpose of obtaining judicial review by any of the following persons to require the director to take action on the permit or its renewal without additional delay: (a) the applicant; (b) any person who participated in the public comment process; or (c) any other person who could obtain judicial review of that action under applicable law.

19-2-109.2. Small business assistance

program. (1) The board shall establish a small business stationary source technical and environmental compliance assistance program that conforms with Title V of the 1990 Clean Air Act to assist small businesses to comply with state and federal air pollution laws. (2) There is created the Compliance Advisory Panel to advise and monitor the program created in Subsection (1). The seven panel members are: (a) two members who are not owners or representatives of owners of small business stationary air pollution sources, selected by the governor to represent the general public; (b) four members who are owners or who represent owners of small business stationary sources selected by leadership of the Utah Legislature as follows: (i) one member selected by the majority leader of the Senate; (ii) one member selected by the minority leader of the Senate; (iii) one member selected by the majority leader of the House of Representatives; and (iv) one member selected by the minority leader of the House of Representatives;

### and (c) one member selected by the

executive director to represent the Division of Air Quality, Department of Environmental Quality. (3) (a) Except as required by Subsection (3)(b), as terms of current panel members expire, the department shall appoint each new member or reappointed member to a four-year term. (b) Notwithstanding the requirements of Subsection (3)(a), the department shall, at the time of appointment or reappointment, adjust the length of terms to ensure that the terms of panel members are staggered so that approximately half of the panel is appointed every two years. (4) Members may serve more than one

term. (5) Members shall hold office until the expiration of their terms and until their successors are appointed, but not more than 90 days after the expiration of their terms. (6) When a vacancy occurs in the membership for any reason, the replacement shall be appointed for the unexpired term. (7) Every two years, the panel shall elect a chair from its members. (8) (a) The panel shall meet as necessary to carry out its duties. Meetings may be called by the chair, the director, or upon written request of three of the members of the panel. (b) Three days' notice shall be given to each member of the panel prior to a meeting. (9) Four members constitute a quorum at any meeting, and the action of the majority of members present is the action of the panel. (10) A member may not receive compensation or benefits for the member's service, but may receive per diem and travel expenses in accordance with: (a) Section 63A-3-106; (b) Section 63A-3-107; and (c) rules made by the Division of Finance pursuant to Sections 63A-3-106 and 63A-3-107.

19-2-109.3. Public access to information. A copy of each permit application, compliance plan, emissions or compliance

mo nitoring report, certification, and each operating permit issued under this chapter shall be made available to the public in accordance with Title 63, Chapter 2, Government Records Access and Management Act.

19-2-109.5. Private sector air quality permitting professionals certification

program. (1) As used in this section, "AQPP" means an air quality permitting professional. (2) The board may establish a program to certify private sector AQPPs, including consultants and employees of companies that may seek air quality permits from the division. Any program established under this section shall include: (a) a training program established and operated by the department, which describes and explains the state law and rules regarding the air quality permit application and approval procedure under this chapter; (b) the requirement to pass an exam to measure qualifications of AQPP applicants; (c) an option for certification of an AQPP by passing the exam without undergoing any training required under the program; (d) an application process, including a fee established under Section 63-38-3.2 that covers the costs of the training, testing, and application process and the department's maintenance of a list of certified AQPPs; (e) certification of qualified AQPP applicants; (f) maintenance by the department of a current list of certified AQPPs, which is available to the public; and (g) procedures for the expedited review by the department of air quality permit applications submitted by certified AQPPs; and (h) professional standards for AQPPs. (3) The board may not require AQPP certification as a condition of preparing or submitting a notice of intent or operating permit application under this chapter. (4) Any program under this section shall provide for revocation of any certification issued under this section if the department determines, through an administrative hearing conducted under Title 63, Chapter 46b, Administrative Procedures Act, that the AQPP:

### (a) knowingly or negligently submitted

false information or data as part of an air quality permit application; (b) prepared more than three air quality permit applications in one calendar year in a manner that each did not substantially comply with department application requirements; (c) prepared any air quality permit application in violation of the professional standards defined by department rule.

19-2-110. Violations

-- Notice to violator

-- Corrective action orders

-- Conference, conciliation, and persuasion by director

-- Hearing s. (1) Whenever the director has reason to believe that a violation of any provision of this chapter or any rule issued under it has occurred, the director may serve written notice of the violation upon the alleged violator. The notice shall specify the provision of this chapter or rule alleged to be violated, the facts alleged to constitute the violation, and may include an order that necessary corrective action be taken within a reasonable time. (2) Nothing in this chapter prevents the director from making efforts to obtain voluntary compliance through warning, conference, conciliation, persuasion, or other appropriate

means. (3) Hearings may be held before an administrative law judge as provided by Section 19-1-301.

19-2-111. Review of orders of hearing examiner

-- Procedure. Any person aggrieved by an order of a hearing examiner may file a motion for review of the order with the board.

19-2-112. Generalized condition of air pollution creating emergency

-- Sources causing imminent danger to health

-- Powers of executive director

-- Declaration of

emergency. (1) (a) Title 63, Chapter 46b, Administrative Procedures Act, and any other provision of law to the contrary notwithstanding, if the executive director finds that a generalized condition of air pollution exists and that it creates an emergency requiring immediate action to protect human health or safety, the executive director, with the concurrence of the governor, shall order persons causing or contributing to the air pollution to reduce or discontinue immediately the emission of air contaminants. (b) The order shall fix a place and time, not later than 24 hours after its issuance, for a hearing to be held before the governor. (c) Not more than 24 hours after the commencement of this hearing, and without adjournment of it, the governor shall affirm, modify, or set aside the order of the executive director. (2) In the absence of a generalized condition of air pollution referred to in Subsection (1), but if the executive director finds th at emissions from the operation of one or more air contaminant sources is causing imminent danger to human health or safety, he may commence adjudicative proceedings under Section 63-46b-20. (3) Nothing in this section limits any power that the governor or any other officer has to declare an emergency and act on the basis of that declaration.

19-2-113. Variances

-- Judicial review. (1) (a) Any person who owns or is in control of any plant, building, structure, establishment, process, or equipment may apply to the board for a variance from its rules. (b) The board may grant the requested variance following an announced public meeting, if it finds, after considering the endangerment to human health and safety and other relevant factors, that compliance with the rules from which variance is sought would produce serious hardship without equal or greater benefits to the public. (2) A variance may not be granted under this section until the board has considered the relative interests of the applicant, other owners of property likely to be affected by the discharges, and the general public. (3) Any variance or renewal of a variance shall be granted within the requirements of Subsection (1) and for time periods and under conditions consistent with the

### reasons for it, and within the following

limitations: (a) if the variance is granted on the grounds that there are no practicable means known or available for the adequate prevention, abatement, or control of the air pollution involved, it shall be only until the necessary means for prevention, abatement, or control become known and available, and subject to the taking of any substitute or alternate measures that the board may prescribe; (b) (i) if the variance is granted on the grounds that compliance with the requirements from which variance is sought will require that measures, because of their extent or cost, must be spread over a long period of time, the variance shall be granted for a reasonable time that, in the view of the board, is required for im plementation of the necessary measures; and (ii) a variance granted on this ground shall contain a timetable for the implementation of remedial measures in an expeditious manner and shall be conditioned on adherence to the timetable; or (c) if the variance is granted on the ground that it is necessary to relieve or prevent hardship of a kind other than that provided for in Subsection (a) or (b), it shall not be granted for more than one year. (4) (a) Any variance granted under this section may be renewed on terms and conditions and for periods that would be appropriate for initially granting a variance. (b) If a complaint is made to the board because of the variance, a renewal may not be granted unless, following an announced public meeting, the board finds that renewal is justified.

(c) To receive a renewal, an applicant shall submit a request for agency action to the board requesting a renewal. (d) Immediately upon receipt of an application for renewal, the board shall give public notice of the application as required by its rules. (5) (a) A variance or renewal is not a right of the applicant or holder but may be granted at the board's discretion. (b) A person aggrieved by the board's decision may obtain judicial review. (c) Venue for judicial review of informal adjudicative proceedings is in the district court in which the air contaminant source is situated. (6) (a) The board may review any variance during the term for which it was granted. (b) The review procedure is the same as that for an original application. (c) The variance may be revoked upon a finding that: (i) the nature or amount of emission has changed or increased; or (ii) if facts existing at the date of the review had existed at the time of the original application, the variance would not have been granted. (7) Nothing in this section and no variance or renewal granted pursuant to it shall be construed to prevent or limit the application of the emergency provisions and procedures of Section 19-2-112 to any person or property.

19-2-114. Activities not in violation of chapter or rules. The following are not a violation of this chapter or of any rules made under it: (1) burning incident to horticultural or agricultural operations of: (a) prunings from trees, bushes, and plants; or (b) dead or diseased trees, bushes, and plants, including stubble; (2) burning of weed growth along ditch banks incident to clearing these ditches for irrigation purposes; (3) controlled heating of orchards or other crops to lessen the chances of their being frozen so long as the emissions from this heating do not violate minimum standards set by the board; and (4) the controlled burning of not more than two structures per year by an organized and operating fire department for the purpose of training fire service personnel when the United States Weather Service clearing index is above 500.

19-2-115. Violations

-- Penalties

-- Reimbursement for expenses.

### (1) As used in this section, the terms

"knowingly," "willfully," and "criminal negligence" shall mean as defined in Section 76-2-103. (2) (a) A person who violates this chapter, or any rule, order, or permit issued or made under this chapter is subject in a civil proceeding to a penalty not to exceed $10,000 per day for each violation. (b) Subsection (2)(a) also applies to rules made under the authority of Section 19-2-104, for implementation of 15 U.S.C.A. 2601 et seq., Toxic Substances Control Act, Subchapter II - Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response. (c) Penalties assessed for violations described in 15 U.S.C.A. 2647, Toxic Substances Control Act, Subchapter II - Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response, may not exceed the amounts specified in that section and shall be used in accordance with that section. (3) A person is guilty of a class A misdemeanor and is subject to imprisonment under Section 76-3-204 and a fine of not more than $25,000 per day of violation if that person knowingly violates any of the following under this chapter: (a) an applicable standard or limitation; (b) a permit condition; or (c) a fee or filing requirement. (4) A person is guilty of a third degree felony and is subject to imprisonment under Section 76-3-203 and a fine of not more than $25,000 per day of violation who knowingly: (a) makes any false material statement, representation, or certification, in any notice or report required by permit; or (b) renders inaccurate any monitoring device or method required to be maintained by this chapter or applicable rules made under this chapter. (5) Any fine or penalty assessed under Subsections (2) or (3) is in lieu of any penalty under Section 19-2-109.1. (6) A person who willfully violates Section 19-2-120 is guilty of a class A misdemeanor. (7) A person who knowingly violates any requirement of an applicable implementation plan adopted by the board, more than 30 days after having been notified in writing by the director that the person is violating the requirement, knowingly violates an order issued under Subsection 19-2-110(1), or knowingly handles or disposes of asbestos in violation of a rule made under this chapter is guilty of a third degree felony and subject to imprisonment under Section 76-3-203 and a fine of not more than $25,000 per day of violation in the case of the first offense, and not more than $50,000 per day of violation in the case of subsequent offenses. (8) (a) As used in this section: (i) "Hazardous air pollutant" means any hazardous air pollutant listed under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 7412 or any extremely hazardous substance listed under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 11002(a)(2). (ii) "Organization" means a legal entity, other than a government, established or organized for any purpose, and includes a corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, joint stock company, foundation, institution, trust, society, union, or any other association of persons. (iii) "Serious bodily injury" means bodily injury which involves a substantial risk of death, unconsciousness, extreme physical pain, protracted and obvious disfigurement, or protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty. (b) (i) A person is guilty of a class A misdemeanor and subject to imprisonment under Section 76-3-204 and a fine of not more than $25,000 per day of violation if that person with criminal negligence: (A) releases into the ambient air any hazardous air pollutant; and (B) places another person in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury. (ii) As used in this Subsection (8)(b), "person" does not include an employee who is carrying out the employee's normal activities and who is not a part of senior management personnel or a corporate officer. (c) A person is guilty of a second degree felony and is subject to imprisonment under Section 76-3-203 and a fine of not more than $50,000 per day of violation if that person: (i) knowingly releases into the ambient air any hazardous air pollutant; and

### (ii) knows at the time that the person is

placing another person in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury. (d) If a person is an organization, it shall, upon conviction of violating Subsection (8)(c), be subject to a fine of not more than $1,000,000. (e) (i) A defendant who is an individual is considered to have acted knowingly under Subsections (8)(c) and (d), if: (A) the defendant's conduct placed another person in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury; and (B) the defendant was aware of or believed that there was an imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury to another person. (ii) Knowledge possessed by a person other than the defendant may not be attributed to the defendant. (iii) Circumstantial evidence may be used to prove that the defendant possessed actual knowledge, including evidence that the defendant took affirmative steps to be shielded from receiving relevant information. (f) (i) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this Subsection (8) that the conduct charged was freely consented to by the person endangered and that the danger and conduct charged were reasonably foreseeable hazards of: (A) an occupation, a business, a profession; or (B) medical treatment or medical or scientific experimentation conducted by professionally approved methods and the other person was aware of the risks involved prior to giving consent. (ii) The defendant has the burden of proof to establish any affirmative defense under this Subsection (8)(f) and shall prove that defense by a preponderance of the evidence. (9) (a) Except as provided in Subsection (9)(b), and unless prohibited by federal law, all penalties assessed and collected under the authority of this section shall be deposited in the General Fund. (b) The department may reimburse itself and local governments from money collected from civil penalties for extraordinary expenses incurred in environmental enforcement activities. (c) The department shall regulate reimbursements by making rules in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act, that: (i) define qualifying environmental enforcement activities; and (ii) define qualifying extraordinary expenses.

19-2-116. Injunction or other remedies to prevent violations

-- Civil actions not abridged. (1) Action under Section 19-2-115 does not bar enforcement of this chapter, or any of the rules adopted under it or any orders made under it by injunction or other appropriate remedy. The director has the power to institute and maintain in the name of the state any and all enforcement proceedings. (2) This chapter does not abridge, limit, impair, create, enlarge, or otherwise affect substantively or procedurally the right of any person to damages or other relief on account of injury to persons or property and to maintain any action or other appropriate proceeding for this

purpose. (3) (a) In addition to any other remedy created in this chapter, the director may initiate an action for appropriate injunctive relief: (i) upon failure of any person to comply with: (A) any provision of this chapter; (B) any rule adopted under this chapter;

or (C) any final order made by the board, the director, or the executive director; and (ii) when it appears necessary for the protection of health and welfare. (b) The attorney general shall bring injunctive relief actions on request. (c) A bond is not required.

19-2-117. Attorney general as legal advisor to board

-- Duties of attorney general and county attorneys. (1) The attorney general is the legal advisor to the board and the director and shall defend them or any of them in all actions or proceedings brought against them or any of them.

### (2) The county attorney in the county in

which a cause of action arises may, upon request of the board or the director, bring any action, civil or criminal, to abate a condition which exists in violation of, or to prosecute for the violation of or to enforce, this chapter or the standards, orders, or rules of the board or the director issued under this chapter. (3) The director may bring any action and be represented by the attorney general. (4) In the event any person fails to comply with a cease and desist order of the board or the director that is not subject to a stay pending administrative or judicial review, the director may initiate an action for, and is entitled to, injunctive relief to prevent any further or continued violation of the order.

19-2-118. Violation of injunction evidence of contempt. Failure to comply with the terms of any injunction issued under this chapter is prima facie evidence of contempt which is punishable as for other civil contempts.

19-2-119. Civil or criminal remedies not excluded

-- Actionable rights under chapter

-- No liability for acts of God or other catastrophes. (1) Existing civil or criminal remedies for any wrongful action which is a violation of any part of the law are not excluded by this chapter. (2) Persons other than the state or the board do not acquire actionable rights by virtue of this chapter. (3) The liabilities imposed for violation of this chapter are not imposed for any violation caused by an act of God, war, strike, riot, or other catastrophe.

19-2-120. Information required of owners or operators of air contaminant sources. The owner or operator of any stationary air contaminant source in the state shall furnish to the director the reports required by rules made in accordance with Section 19-2-104 and any other information the director finds necessary to determine whether the source is in compliance with state and federal regulations and standards. The information shall be correlated with applicable emission standards or limitations and shall be available to the public during normal business hours at the office of the division.

19-2-121. Ordinances of political subdivisions authorized. Any political subdivision of the state may enact and enforce ordinances to control air pollution that are consistent with this chapter.

19-2-122. Cooperative agreements between political subdivisions and department. (1) Any political subdivision of the state may enter into and perform with other political subdivisions of the state or with th e department contracts and agreements as they find proper for establishing, planning, operating, and financing air pollution programs. (2) The agreements may provide for an agency to: (a) supervise and operate an air pollution program; (b) prescribe, subject to the approval of the board, the agency's powers and duties; and

(c) fix the compensation of the agency's members and employees.

19-2-123. Tax relief to encourage investment in facilities

-- Sales and use tax exemption. (1) It is in the public interest of the state to encourage, through tax relief, investment in pollution control and pollution elimination facilities while at the same time making and keeping the state an attractive location for continued industrial development, including the expansion of existing plants, thereby increasing employment and payrolls and upgrading the natural resources of the state. (2) All materials and equipment purchased, leased, or otherwise procured and services utilized for the construction or installation in a pollution control facility are exempt from sales and use taxes imposed by Title 59, Chapter 12, Sales and Use Tax Act, upon obtaining a certification of pollution control facility from the board.

19-2-124. Application for certification of

### pollution control facility

-- Refunds

--

Interest. (1) (a) A person who qualifies under Subsection (2) may apply to the board for certification of a pollution control facility or facilities erected, constructed, or installed, or to be erected, constructed, or installed in the state on or after July 1, 1986, but on or before June 30, 2009. (b) The person may file the application at any time after a firm construction contract has been entered or construction has commenced. (2) (a) (i) A person who applies under Subsection (1) shall be the owner of a trade or business that uses property in the state requiring a pollution control facility to prevent or minimize pollution or a person who, as a lessee or pursuant to an agreement, conducts the trade or business that operates or uses the property. (ii) For purposes of this Subsection (2), "owner" includes a contract purchaser. (b) The facility shall be owned, operated, or leased during a part of the tax year in which the exemption is claimed. (c) A person who obtains certification for a pollution control facility may claim an exemption from sales and use taxes as provided in Sections 19 -2-123 and 59-12-104 only during the time period beginning on or after July 1, 1986, and ending on or before June 30, 2009. (d ) A person who pays a tax under Title 59, Chapter 12, Sales and Use Tax Act, on a purchase of tangible personal property or services used in the construction of or incorporated into a pollution control facility that: (i) is not certified under Section 19-2- 125, may obtain a refund of the tax if: (A) the board subsequently certifies the pollution control facility; (B) the tangible personal property or services meet the requirements for exemption provided in Subsections 19-2-123(2) and 59-12- 104(11), except for the certification requirement; and (C) the person files a claim for the refund with the State Tax Commission within the lesser of: (I) three years after the day on which the pollution control facility is certified under Section 19-2-125; or (II) six years after the day on which the person pays the tax under Title 59, Chapter 12, Sales and Use Tax Act; or (ii) is certified under Section 19-2-125, may obtain a refund of the tax if: (A) the tangible personal property or services meet the requirements for exemption provided in Subsections 19-2-123(2) and 59-12- 104(11); and (B) the person files a claim for the refund with the State Tax Commission within three years after the day on which the person pays the tax under Title 59, Chapter 12, Sales and Use Tax Act. (e) (i) If a person files a claim for a refund of taxes under Subsection (2)(d)(i) paid on a purchase of tangible personal property or services used in the construction of or incorporated into a pollution control facility that was not certified under Section 19-2-125 at the time of the purchase: (A) within 180 days after the day on which the board certifies the pollution control facility, interest shall accrue to the amount of the refund granted by the State Tax Commission:

(I) at the rate prescribed in Section 59- 1-402; and (II) beginning on the day on which the person pays the tax under Title 59, Chapter 12, Sales and Use Tax Act, for which the person is claiming a refund; or (B) more than 180 days after the day on which the board certifies the pollution control facility, interest shall be added to the amount of the refund granted by the State Tax Commission: (I) at the rate prescribed in Section 59- 1-402; and (II) beginning 30 days after the day on which the person files the claim for a refund under Subsection (2)(d). (ii) If a person files a claim for a refund of taxes under Subsection (2)(d)(ii) paid on a purchase of tangible personal property or services used in the construction of or incorporated into a pollution control facility that was certified under Section 19-2-125 at the time of the purchase, interest shall accrue to the amount of the refund granted by the State Tax

### Commission:

(A) at the rate prescribed in Section 59- 1-402; and (B) beginning 30 days after the day on which the person files a claim for a refund under Subsection (2)(d). (3) (a) Each application shall be in a format prescribed by the board, contain a description of the facilities and materials incorporated in them, the machinery and equipment, the existing or proposed operational procedure, and a statement of the purpose of pollution prevention, control, or reduction served or to be served by the facility. (b) The board may require any further information it finds necessary before issuance of a certificate.

19-2-125. Action on application for certification. (1) (a) If the board, after consulting with the State Tax Commission, finds that a pollution control facility or a part of a pollution control facility, for which application is mad e under Section 19-2-124 was or is to be erected, constructed, acquired, or installed on or after July 1, 1986, but on or before June 30, 2009, and is designed and is being operated or will operate primarily to prevent, control, or reduce air or water pollution, and that the applicant qualifies under Section 19-2-124, the board shall certify the facility. (b) If one or more facilities constitute an operational unit, the board may certify those facilities under one certificate. (2) (a) The board and the State Tax Commission shall act on an application under Section 19-2-124 before the 120th day after filing. (b) Failure of the board and the State Tax Commission to timely act constitutes automatic acceptance of the application and the board shall furnish a certificate to the applicant on demand.

19-2-126. Revocation of certification

-- Grounds

-- Procedure. (1) (a) The board, after consulting with the State Tax Commission, may revoke the certification issued under Section 19-2-125 of any pollution control facility if it finds that the: (i) certification was obtained by fraud or gross misrepresentation; or (ii) holder of the certificate has failed substantially to operate the facility for the purpose of, and to the extent necessary to prevent, control, or reduce air or water pollution as specified in the certificate. (b) A shutdown of the facility due to force majeure, including obsolescence, is not cause to revoke certification of any facility. (2) (a) The board shall provide notice of the revocation by issuing a notice of agency action. (b) The holder of the certificate may obtain judicial review of the revocation. (c) The revocation is final and conclusive unless an appeal is taken. (d) If the revocation is affirmed on appeal, revocation is final on the date notice of revocation was received by the holder. (3) As soon as a revocation under this section is final, the board shall notify the State Tax Commission of the revocation. (4) (a) If the certification of a pollution control facility is revoked, all prior tax relief provided to the holder because of the certificate is forfeited. (b) The State Tax Commission shall collect taxes not paid by the holder because of the tax relief provided the holder to the extent permitted by the applicable statute of limitations.

19-2-127. Rules for administering certification for tax relief. In addition to the powers granted it, the board may formulate, amend, or cancel rules establishing procedures for processing and evaluating applications for certification, establishing procedures for the issuance and revocation of certificates, and all other matters pertaining to the board in administering certification for tax relief on pollution control facilities.

# Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act

Utah Code Title 63G, Ch apter 3 (May 12, 2009)

Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act

.............................................................................................................................. ................. 1 Title 63G. General Government.

.............................................................................................................................. .................... 1

Chapter 3. Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act. ................................................................................................................... 1

Part 1. General Provisions.

.............................................................................................................................. ..................... 1

63G-3-101. Title.

.............................................................................................................................. ................................ 1 63G-3-102. Definitions.

.............................................................................................................................. .................... 1 Part 2. Circumstances Requiring Rulemaking - Status of Administrative Rules. ................................................................. 2

63G-3-201. When rulemaking is required. ...................................................................................................................... 2 63G-3-202. Rules having the effect of law. .................................................................................................................... 3 Part 3. Rulemaking Proceures.

.............................................................................................................................. ............... 3

63G-3-301. Rulemaking procedure.

.............................................................................................................................. .. 3 63G-3-302. Public hearings.

.............................................................................................................................. ............. 4 63G-3-303. Changes in rules.

.............................................................................................................................. ............ 4 63G-3-304. Emergency rulemaking procedure. .............................................................................................................. 5 63G-3-305. Agency review of rules -- Schedule of filings -- Limited exemption for certain rules. ................................ 5 Part 4. Division of Administrative Rules. ............................................................................................................................ 5

63G-3-401. Division of Administrative Ru les created -- Appointment of director. ........................................................ 5 63G-3-402. Division of Administrative Rules -- Duties generally. ................................................................................. 6 63G-3-403. Repeal and reenactme nt of Utah Administrative Code. ............................................................................... 6 Part 5. Legislative Oversight.

.............................................................................................................................. ................. 7

63G-3-501. Administrative Rules Review Committee. ................................................................................................... 7 63G-3-502. Legislative reauthorization of agen cy rules -- Extension of rules by governor. ........................................... 8 Part 6. Judicial Review.

.............................................................................................................................. ......................... 8

63G-3-601. Interested parties -- Petition for agency action. ............................................................................................ 8 63G-3-602. Judicial challenge to administrative rules. ................................................................................................... 8 63G-3-603. Time for contesting a rule -- Statute of limitations. ..................................................................................... 9 Part 7. Official Compilation of Administrative Rules. ......................................................................................................... 9

63G-3-701. Utah Administrative Code as offi cial compilation of ru les -- Judicial notice. ............................................... 9 63G-3-702. Utah Administrative Code -- Organization -- Official compilation. .............................................................. 9



### Title 63G. General Government.

Chapter 3. Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act.

Part 1. General Provisions.

63G-3-101. Title. This chapter is known as the "Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act." Renumbered and Amended by C hapter 382, Laws of Utah 2008 General Session, effective May 5, 2008 (formerly Section 63-46a-1)

63G-3-102. Definitions. As used in this chapter: (1) "Administrative record" means information an agency relies upon when making a rule under this chapter including: (a) the proposed rule, chan ge in the proposed rule, and the rule analysis form; (b) the public comment received and recorded by the agency during the public comment period; (c) the agency's response to the public comment; (d) the agency's analysis of the public comment; and (e) the agency's report of its decision-making

process. (2) "Agency" means each state board, authority, commission, institution, department, division, officer, or other state government entity other than the Legislature, its committees, the political subdivisions of the state, or the courts, which is authorized or required by law to make rules, adjudicate, grant or withhold li censes, grant or withhold relief from legal obligations, or perfo rm other similar actions or duties delegated by law. (3) "Bulletin" means the Utah State Bulletin. (4) "Catchline" means a short summary of each section, part, rule, or title of the code that follows the section, part, rule, or title reference placed before the text of the rule and serves the same function as boldface in legislation as described in Section 68-3-13. (5) "Code" means the body of all effective rules as compiled and organized by th e division and entitled "Utah Administrative Code." (6) "Director" means the director of the Division of Administrative Rules.Utah Administrative Rulema king Act, 2009 Page 2

2 (7) "Division" means the Division of Administrative Rules. (8) "Effective" means operative and enforceable. (9) (a) "File" means to submit a document to the division as prescribed by the division. (b) "Filing date" means the day and time the document is recorded as received by the division. (10) "Interested person" m eans any person affected by or interested in a proposed rule, amendment to an existing rule, or a nonsubstantive change made under Section 63G-3- 402. (11) "Order" means an agency action that determines the legal rights, duties, privileges, immunities, or other interests of one or more specific persons , but not a class of persons. (12) "Person" means any individual, partnership, corporation, association, govern mental entity, or public or private organization of any character other than an agency. (13) "Publication" or " publish" means making a rule available to the public by including the rule or a summary of the rule in the bulletin. (14) "Publication date" means the inscribed date of the bulletin. (15) "Register" may include an electronic database. (16) (a) "Rule" means an agency's written statement that: (i) is explicitly or implicitly required by state or federal statute or other applicable law; (ii) implements or interprets a state or federal legal mandate; and (iii) applies to a class of persons or another

agency. (b) "Rule" includes the amendment or repeal of an existing rule. (c) "Rule" does not mean: (i) orders; (ii) an agency's written statement that applies only to internal manageme nt and that does not restrict the legal rights of a public class of persons or another agency; (iii) the governor's executive orders or proclamations; (iv) opinions issued by the attorney general's office; (v) declaratory rulings issued by the agency according to Section 63G-4-503 except as required by Section 63G-3-201; (vi) rulings by an agency in adjudicativeproceedings, except as required by Subsection 63G3-201(6); or (vii) an agency written statement that is in violation of any state or federal law. (17) "Rule analysis" means the format prescribed by the division to summarize and analyze rules. (18) "Small business" means a business employing fewer than 50 persons. (19) "Substantive change" means a change in a rule that affects the application or results of agency actions. Renumbered and Amended by C hapter 382, Laws of Utah 2008 General Session, effective May 5, 2008 (formerly Section 63-46a-2) 

### Part 2. Circumstances Requiring Rulemaking - Status of Administrative Rules.

63G-3-201. When rulemaking is required. (1) Each agency shall: (a) maintain a current version of its rules; and (b) make it available to the public for inspection during its regular business hours. (2) In addition to other rulemaking required by law, each agency shall make rules when agency action: (a) authorizes, requires, or prohibits an action; (b) provides or prohibits a material benefit; (c) applies to a class of persons or another agency; and (d) is explicitly or implicitly authorized by statute. (3) Rulemaking is also required when an agency issues a written interpretation of a state or federal legal mandate. (4) Rulemaking is not required when: (a) agency action applies only to internal agency management, inmates or residents of a state correctional, diagnostic, or detention facili ty, persons under state legal custody, patients admitted to a state hospital, members of the state retirement system, or students enrolled in a state education institution; (b) a standardized agency manual applies only to internal fiscal or administra tive details of governmental entities supervised under statute; (c) an agency issues policy or other statements that are advisory, informative, or descriptive, and do not conform to the requirements of Subsections (2) and (3);

or (d) an agency makes nonsubstantive changes in a rule, except that the agency shall file al l nonsubstantive changes in a rule with the division. (5) (a) A rule shall enumerate any penalty authorized by statute that may result from its violation, subject to Subsections (5)(b) and (c). (b) A violation of a rule may not be subject to the criminal penalty of a class C misdemeanor or greater offense, except as provide d under Subsection (5)(c). (c) A violation of a rule may be subject to a class C or greater criminal penalty under Subsection (5)(a) when: (i) authorized by a specific state statute; (ii) a state law and programs under that law are established in order for the state to obtain or maintain primacy over a federal program; or (iii) state civil or criminal penalties established by state statute regarding the program are equivalent to or less than corresponding federal civil or criminal penalties. (6) Each agency shall enact rules incorporating the principles of law not already in its rules that are established by final adjudicative decisions within 120 days after the decision is announced in its cases. (7) (a) Each agency may enact a rule that incorporates by reference: (i) all or any part of another code, rule, or regulation that has been adopted by a federal agency, an agency or political subdivision of this state, an agency of another state, or by a nationally recognized organization or association;Utah Administrative Rulema king Act, 2009 Page 3

3 (ii) state agency implementation plans mandated by the fede ral government for participation in the federal program; (iii) lists, tables, illustrations, or similar materials that are subject to frequent change, fully described in the rule, an d are availabl e for public inspection; or (iv) lists, tables, illustrations, or similar materials that the director determines are too expensive to reproduce in the administrative code. (b) Rules incorporating materials by reference shall: (i) be enacted according to the procedures outlined in this chapter; (ii) state that the referenced material is incorporated by reference; (iii) state the date, issue, or version of the material being incorporated; and (iv) define specifically what material is incorporated by reference and identify any agency deviations from it. (c) The agency shall identify any substantive changes in the material incorporated by reference by following the rulemaking procedures of this chapter. (d) The agency shall maintain a complete and current copy of the referenced material available for public review at the agency and at the division. (8) (a) This chapter is not intended to inhibit the exercise of agency discretion within the limits prescribed by statute or agency rule. (b) An agency may enact a rule creating a justified exception to a rule. (9) An agency may obtain assistance from the attorney general to ensure that its rules meet legal and constitutional requirements. Amended by Chapter 347, Laws of Utah 2009 General Session, effective May 12, 2009 (formerly Section 63-46a-3)

63G-3-202. Rules having the effect of law. (1) An agency's written statement is a rule if it conforms to the definition of a rule under Section 63G-3-102, but the written statement is not enforceable unless it is made as a rule in accordance with the requirements of this chapter. (2) An agency's written statement that is made as a rule in accordance with the requirements of this chapter is enforceable and has the effect of law. Renumbered and Amended by C hapter 382, Laws of Utah 2008 General Session, effective May 5, 2008 (formerly Section 63-46a-3.5)



### Part 3. Rulemaking Procedures.

63G-3-301. Rulemaking procedure. (1) An agency authorized to make rules is also authorized to amend or repeal those rules. (2) Except as provided in Sections 63G-3-303 and 63G3-304, when making, amending, or repealing a rule agencies shall comply with: (a) the requirements of this section; (b) consistent procedures required by other statutes; (c) applicable fe deral manda tes; and (d) rules made by the division to implement this chapter. (3) Subject to the requiremen ts of this chapter, each agency shall develop and use flexible approaches in drafting rules that meet the needs of the agency and that involve persons affected by the agency's rules. (4) (a) Each agency shall f ile its proposed rule and rule analysis with the division. (b) Rule amendments shall be marked with new language underlined and deleted language struck out. (c) (i) The division shall publish the information required under Subsection (8) on the rule analysis and the text of the proposed rule in the next issue of the bulletin. (ii) For rule amendments, only the section or subsection of the rule being amended need be printed. (iii) If the director determines that the rule is too long to publish, the director shall publish the rule analysis and shall publish the rule by reference to a copy on file with the division. (5) Prior to filing a rule with the division, the department head shall consid er and comment on the fiscal impact a rule may have on businesses. (6) If the agency reasonably expects that a proposed rule will have a measurable negative fiscal impact on small businesses, the agency shall c onsider, as allowed by federal law, each of the following methods of reducing the impact of the rule on small businesses: (a) establishing less stringent compliance or reporting requirements for small businesses; (b) establishing less stringent schedules or deadlines for compliance or reporting requirements for small businesses; (c) consolidating or simplifying compliance or reporting requirements for small businesses; (d) establishing performan ce standards for small businesses to replace design or operational standards required in the proposed rule; and (e) exempting small businesses from all or any part of the requirements contained in the proposed rule. (7) If during the public comment period an agency receives comment that the proposed rule will cost small business more than one day's annual average gross receipts, and the agency had not previously performed the analysis in Subsection (6), the agency shall perform the analysis described in Subsection (6). (8) The rule analysis shall contain: (a) a summary of the rule or change; (b) the purpose of the rule or reason for the change; (c) the statutory authority or federal requirement for the rule; (d) the anticipated cost or savings to: (i) the state budget; (ii) local governments; (iii) small businesses; and (iv) persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities; (e) the compliance cost for affected persons; (f) how interested persons may review the full text of the rule; (g) how interested persons may present their views on the rule;Utah Administrative Rulema king Act, 2009 Page 4

4 (h) the time and place of any scheduled public hearing; (i) the name and telephone number of an agency employee who may be contacted about the rule; (j) the name of the agency head or designee who authorized the rule; (k) the date on which the rule may become effective following the publ ic comment period; and (l) comments by the department head on the fiscal impact the rule may have on businesses. (9) (a) For a rule being repealed and reenacted, the rule analysis shall contain a summary that generally includes the following: (i) a summary of substantive provisions in the repealed rule which are eliminated from the enacted rule; and (ii) a summary of new substantive provisions appearing only in the enacted rule. (b) The summary required under this Subsection (9) is to aid in review and may not be used to contest any rule on the ground of noncompliance with the procedural requirements of this chapter. (10) A copy of the rule analysis shall be mailed to all persons who have ma de timely request of the agency for advance notice of its rulemaking proceedings and to any other person who, by statutory or federal mandate or in the judgment of the agency, should also receive notice. (11) (a) Following the publication date, the agency shall allow at least 30 days for public comment on the rule. (b) The agency shall review and evaluate all public comments submitted in writing within the time period under Subsection (11)(a) or presented at public hearings conducted by the agency within the time period under Subsection (11)(a). (12) (a) Except as provide d in Sections 63G-3-303 and 63G-3-304, a proposed rule becomes effective on any date specified by the agency that is no fewer than seven calendar days after the close of the public comment period under Subsection (11), nor more than 120 days after the publication date. (b) The agency shall provide notice of the rule's effective date to the division in the form required by the division. (c) The notice of effective date may not provide for an effective date prior to the date it is received by the division. (d) The division shall publish notice of the effective date of the rule in the next issue of the bulletin. (e) A proposed rule lapses if a notice of effective date or a change to a proposed rule is not filed with the division within 120 days of publication. (13) (a) As used in th is Subsection (13), "initiate rulemaking proceedings" means the filing, for the purposes of publication in accordance with Subsection (4), of an agency's proposed rule that is required by state statute. (b) A state agency shall initiate rulemaking proceedings no later than 180 days after the effective date of the statutory provisi on that specifically requires the rulemaking, except under Subsection (13)(c). (c) When a statute is enacted that requires agency rulemaking and the affected agency already has rules in place that meet the statutory requirement, the agency shall submit the rules to the Administrative Rules Review Committee for review within 60 days after the statute requiring the ru lemaking takes effect. (d) If a state agency does not initiate rulemaking proceedings in accordance with the time requirements in Subsection (13)(b), the state agency shall appear before the legislative Administrative Rules Review Committee and provide the reasons for the delay. Amended by Chapter 93, Laws of Utah 2009 General Session, effective May 12, 2009 (formerly Section 63-46a-4)

63G-3-302. Public hearings. (1) Each agency may hold a public hearing on a proposed rule, amendment to a rule , or repeal of a rule during the public comment period. (2) Each agency shall hold a public hearing on a proposed rule, amendment to a ru le, or repeal of a rule if: (a) a public hearing is re quired by state or federal mandate; (b) (i) another state agency, ten interested persons, or an interested association having not fewer than ten members request a public hearing; and (ii) the agency receives the request in writing not more than 15 days after the publication date of the proposed rule. (3) The agency shall hold the hearing: (a) before the rule becomes effective; and (b) no less than seven days nor more than 30 days after receipt of the request for hearing. Renumbered and Amended by C hapter 382, Laws of Utah 2008 General Session, effective May 5, 2008 (formerly Section 63-46a-5)

63G-3-303. Changes in rules. (1) (a) To change a proposed rule already published in the bulletin, an agency shall file with the division: (i) the text of the changed rule; and (ii) a rule analysis c ontaining a description of the change and the information required by Section 63G-3-301. (b) A change to a proposed rule may not be filed more than 120 days after publication of the rule being changed. (c) The division shall publish the rule analysis for the changed rule in the bulletin. (d) The changed proposed rule and its associated proposed rule will become effective on a date specified by the agency, not less than 30 days or more than 120 days after publication of the la st change in proposed rule. (e) A changed proposed rule and its associated proposed rule lapse if a no tice of effective date or another change to a proposed rule is not filed with the division within 120 days of publ ication of the last change in proposed rule. (2) If the rule change is nonsubstantive: (a) the agency need not comply with the requirements of Subsection (1); and (b) the agency shall notify the division of the change in writing. (3) If the rule is effective, the agency shall amend the rule according to the procedur es specified in Section 63G-3- 301.Utah Administrative Rulema king Act, 2009 Page 5

5 Renumbered and Amended by C hapter 382, Laws of Utah 2008 General Session, effective May 5, 2008 (formerly Section 63-46a-6)

63G-3-304. Emergency rulemaking procedure. (1) All agencies shall comply with the rulemaking procedures of Section 63G-3-301 unless an agency finds that these procedures would: (a) cause an imminent peril to the public health, safety, or welfare; (b) cause an imminent budget reduction because of budget restraints or federal requirements; or (c) place the agency in violation of federal or state law. (2) (a) When finding that its rule is excepted from regular rulemaking procedures by this section, the agency shall file with the division: (i) the text of the rule; and (ii) a rule analysis that includes the specific reasons and justifications for its findings. (b) The division shall publish the rule in the bulletin as provided in Subsection 63G-3-301(4). (c) The agency shall notify interested persons as provided in Subsection 63G-3-301(10). (d) The rule becomes effective for a period not exceeding 120 days on the date of filing or any later date designated in the rule. (3) If the agency intends the rule to be effective beyond 120 days, the agency shall also comply with the procedures of Section 63G-3-301. Amended by Chapter 300, Laws of Utah 2008 General Session; and Renumbered and Amended by C hapter 382, Laws of Utah 2008 General Session, effective May 5, 2008 (formerly Section 63-46a-7)

63G-3-305. Agency review of rules -- Schedule of filings -- Limited exemption for certain rules. (1) Each agency shall review each of its rules within five years of the rule's original effective date or within five years of the filing of the last five-year review, whichever is later. Rules effective prior to 1992 need not be reviewed until 1997. (2) An agency may consider any substantial review of a rule to be a five-year review. If the agency chooses to consider a review a five-year review, it shall follow the procedures outlined in Subsection (3). (3) At the conclusion of its review, the agency shall file a notice of review on or before the anniversary date indicating its intent to continue, am end, or repeal the rule. (a) If the agency continues the rule, it shall file a statement which includes: (i) a concise explanation of the particular statutory provisions under which the rule is enacted and how these provisions authorize or require the rule; (ii) a summary of written comments received during and since the last five-year review of the rule from interested persons supporting or opposing the rule; and (iii) a reasoned justification for continuation of the rule, including reasons why the agency disagrees with comments in opposition to the rule, if any. (b) If the agency repeals the rule, it shall comply with Section 63G-3-301. (c) If the agency amends and continues the rule, it shall comply with the requirements of Section 63G-3- 301 and file the statement required in Subsection (3)(a). (4) (a) The division shall publish the notice and statement in the bulletin. (b) The division may schedule the publication of agency notices and statemen ts, provided that no notice and statement shall be published more than one year after the review deadline established under Subsection (1). (5) The division shall notify an agency of rules due for review at least 180 days prior to the anniversary date. (6) If an agency finds that it will not meet the deadline established in Subsection (1): (a) the agency may file an extension prior to the anniversary date with the di vision indicating the reason for the extension; and (b) the division shall publish notice of the extension in the next issue of the bulletin. (7) An extension permits the agency to file a notice no more than 120 days after the anniversary date. (8) If an agency fails to file a notice of review or extension on or before the date specified in the notice mandated in Subsection (5), the division shall: (a) publish a notice in the next issue of the bulletin that the rule has expired and is no longer enforceable; (b) remove the rule from the code; and (c) notify the agency that the rule has expired. (9) After a rule expires, an agency must comply with the requirements of Section 63G-3-301 to reenact the rule. (10) (a) Rules issued under the following provisions related to the Department of Workforce Services or Labor Commission that are in effect on July 1, 1997, are not subject to the requirements of this section until July 1, 1998: (i) Title 34, Labor in General; (ii) Title 34A, Utah Labor Code; (iii) Title 35A, Utah Workforce Services Code; (iv) Title 40, Chapter 2, Coal Mines; and (v) Title 57, Chapter 21, Utah Fair Housing Act. (b) Any rule described inSubsection (10)(a) that would have expired on or after July 1, 1997 but before July 1, 1998, expires July 1, 1998, unless for that rule the Department of Workforce Services or Labor Commission files: (i) the notice of re view, described in Subsection (3); or (ii) an extension described in Subsection (6). Renumbered and Amended by C hapter 382, Laws of Utah 2008 General Session, effective May 5, 2008 (formerly Section 63-46a-9)



### Part 4. Division of Administrative Rules.

63G-3-401. Division of Administrative Rules created -- Appointment of director. (1) There is created within the Department of Administrative Services the Divi sion of Administrative Rules, to be administered by a director.Utah Administrative Rulema king Act, 2009 Page 6

6 (2) The director of administrative rules shall be appointed by the executive dire ctor with the approval of the

governor. Renumbered and Amended by C hapter 382, Laws of Utah 2008 General Session, effective May 5, 2008 (formerly Section 63-46a-9.5)

63G-3-402. Division of Admi nistrative Rules -- Duties generally. (1) The Division of Admi nistrative Rules shall: (a) establish all filing, publication, and hearing procedures necessary to make rules under this chapter; (b) record in a register the receipt of all agency rules, rule analysis forms, and notices of effective dates; (c) make the register, copies of all proposed rules, and rulemaking documents available for public inspection; (d) publish all proposed rule s, rule analyses, notices of effective dates, and review notices in the bulletin at least monthly, except that the division may publish the complete text of any proposed rule that the director determines is too long to print or too expensive to publish by reference to the text maintained by the division; (e) compile, format, number, and index all effective rules in an administrative code, and periodically publish that code and supplements or revisions to it; (f) publish a digest of all rules and notices contained in the most recent bulletin; (g) publish at least annually an index of all changes to the administrative code and the effective date of each change; (h) print, or contract to print, all rulemaking publications the division de termines necessary to implement this chapter; (i) distribute without charge the bulletin and administrative code to state-designated repositories, the Administrative Rules Review Committee, the Office of Legislative Research and Ge neral Counsel, and the two houses of the Legislature; (j) distribute without charge the digest and index to state legislators, agencies , political subdivisions on request, and the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel; (k) distribute, at prices covering publication costs, all paper rulemaking publicatio ns to all other requesting persons and agencies; (l) provide agencies assistance in rulemaking; and (m) administer this chapter and require state agencies to comply with filing, publication, and hearing procedures. (2) The division may after notifying the agency make nonsubstantive changes to rules filed with the division or published in the bulletin or code by: (a) implementing a uniform system of formatting, punctuation, capitalization, organization, numbering, and wording; (b) correcting obvious errors and inconsistencies in punctuation, capitalization, numbering, referencing, and wording; (c) changing a catchline to more accurately reflect the substance of each section, part, rule, or title; (d) updating or correcting annotations associated with a section, part, rule, or title; and (e) merging or determining priority of any amendment, enactment, or repeal to the same rule or section made effective by an agency. (3) In addition, the division may make the following nonsubstantive changes with the concurrence of the agency: (a) eliminate duplication within rules; (b) eliminate obsolete and redundant words; and (c) correcting defective or inconsistent section and paragraph structure in arrangement of the subject matter of rules. (4) For nonsubstantive changes made in accordance with Subsection (2) or (3) after publ ication of the rule in the bulletin, the division shall publish a list of nonsubstantive changes in the bulletin. For each nonsubstantive change, the list shall include: (a) the affected code citation; (b) a brief description of the change; and (c) the date the change was made. (5) All funds appropriated or collected for publishing the division's publications shall be nonlapsing. Renumbered and Amended by C hapter 382, Laws of Utah 2008 General Session, effective May 5, 2008 (formerly Section 63-46a-10)

63G-3-403. Repeal and reenactment of Utah Administrative Code. (1) When the director determines that the Utah Administrative Code requires extensive revision and reorganization, the division may repeal the code and reenact a new code according to the requirements of this section. (2) The division may: (a) reorganize, reformat , and renumber the code; (b) require each agency to review its rules and make any organizational or substantive changes according to the requirements of Section 63G-3-303; and (c) require each agency to prepare a brief summary of all substantive changes made by the agency. (3) The division may make nonsubstantive changes in the code by: (a) adopting a uniform system of punctuation, capitalization, numbering, and wording; (b) eliminating duplication; (c) correcting defective or inconsistent section and paragraph structure in arrangement of the subject matter of rules; (d) eliminating all obsol ete or redundant words; (e) correcting obvious erro rs and inconsistencies in punctuation, capitalization, numbering, referencing, and wording; (f) changing a catchline to more accurately reflect the substance of each section, part, rule, or title; (g) updating or correcting annotations associated with a section, part, rule, or title; and (h) merging or determining priority of any amendment, enactment, or repeal to the same rule or section made effective by an agency. (4) (a) To inform the public about the proposed code reenactment, the division shall publish in the bulletin: (i) notice of the code reenactment;Utah Administrative Rulema king Act, 2009 Page 7

7 (ii) the date, time, and place of a public hearing where members of the public may comment on the proposed reenactment of the code; (iii) locations where the proposed reenactment of the code may be reviewed; and (iv) agency summaries of substantive changes in the reenacted code. (b) To inform the public about substantive changes in agency rules contained in the proposed reenactment, each agency shall: (i) make the text of their reenacted rules available: (A) for public review during regular business hours; and (B) in an electronic version; and (ii) comply with the requirements of Subsection 63G-3-301(10). (5) The division shall hold a public hearing on the proposed code reenactment no fewer than 30 days nor more than 45 days after the public ation required by Subsection (4)(a). (6) The division shall distribute complete text of the proposed code reenactment without charge to: (a) state-designated repositories in Utah; (b) the Administrative Rules Review Committee; and (c) the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel. (7) The former code is repealed and the reenacted code is effective at noon on a date de signated by the division that is not fewer than 45 days nor more than 90 days after the publication date required by this section. (8) Repeal and reenactment of the code meets the requirements of Section 63G-3-305 for a review of all agency rules. Amended by Chapter 300, Laws of Utah 2008 General Session; and Renumbered and Amended by C hapter 382, Laws of Utah 2008General Session, effective May 5, 2008 (formerly Section 63-46a10.5)



### Part 5. Legislative Oversight.

63G-3-501. Administrative Rules Review Committee. (1) (a) There is created an Administrative Rules Review Committee of ten permanent members and four ex officio members. (b) (i) The committee's permanent members shall be composed of five members of the Senate, appointed by the president of the Senate, and five members of the House, appointed by the speaker of the House, with no more than three senators and three representatives from the same political party. (ii) The permanent members shall convene at least once each month as a committee to review new agency rules, amendments to existing agency rules, and repeals of existing agency rules. Meetings may be suspended at the discretion of the committee chairs. (iii) Members shall serve for two-year terms or until their successors are appointed. (iv) A vacancy exists whenever a committee member ceases to be a member of the Legislature, or when a member resigns from the committee. Vacancies shall be filled by the appointing authority, and the replacement shall serve out the unexpired term. (c) When the committee reviews existing rules, the committee's permanent members shall invite the Senate and House chairmen of the standing committee and the Senate and House chairm en of the appropriation subcommittee that have jurisdiction over the agency whose existing rules are being reviewed to participate as nonvoting, ex officio memb ers with the committee. (d) Three representatives and three senators from the permanent members are a quorum for the transaction of business at any meeting. (2) Each agency rule as defined in Section 63G-3-102 shall be submitted to the committee at the same time public notice is given under Section 63G-3-301. (3) (a) The committee shall exercise continuous oversight of the process of rulemaking. (b) The committee shall examine rules submitted by each agency to determine: (i) whether or not they are authorized by
statute; (ii) whether or not they comply with legislative intent; (iii) their impact on the economy and the government operations of the state and local political subdivisions; and (iv) their impact on affected persons. (c) To carry out these duties, the committee may examine any other issues that it considers necessary. The committee may also notify and refer rules to the chairmen of the interim committee which has jurisdiction over a particular agency when the committee determines that an issue involved in an agency's rules may be more appropriately addressed by that committee. (d) In reviewing the rules, the committee shall follow generally accepted pr inciples of statutory construction. (4) The committee may request that the Office of the Legislative Fiscal Analyst prepare a fiscal note on any rule. (5) In order to accomplish its oversight functions, the committee has all the powers granted to legislative interim committees as set forth in Section 36-12-11. (6) (a) The committee may prepare written findings of its review of each rule and may include any recommendations, including legislative action. (b) The committee shall provide to the agency that enacted the rule: (i) its findings, if any; and (ii) a request that the agency notify the committee of any changes it makes in the rule. (c) The committee shall provide its findings to any member of the Legislature and to any person affected by the rule who requests the findings. (d) The committee shall provide its findings to the presiding officers of both the House and the Senate, Senate and House chairs of the standing committee, and the Senate and House chai rs of the Appropriation Subcommittee that have jurisdiction over the agency whose rules are the subject of the findings.Utah Administrative Rulema king Act, 2009 Page 8

8 (7) (a) The committee may submit a report on its review of state agency rules to each member of the Legislature at each regular session. (b) The report shall include: (i) the findings and re commendations made by the committee under Subsection (6); (ii) any action taken by an agency in response to committee recommendations; and (iii) any recommendations by the committee for legislation. Renumbered and Amended by C hapter 382, Laws of Utah 2008 General Session, effective May 5, 2008 (formerly Section 63-46a-11)

63G-3-502. Legislative reauthorization of agency rules -- Extension of rules by governor. (1) All grants of rulemaking power from the Legislature to a state agency in any statute are made subject to the provisions of this section. (2) (a) Except as provided in Subsection (2)(b), every agency rule that is in effect on February 28 of any calendar year expires on May 1 of that year unless it has been reauthorized by the Legislature. (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection (2)(a), an agency's rules do not expire if: (i) the rule is explicitly mandated by a federal law or regulation; or (ii) a provision of Utah's constitution vests the agency with specific constitutional authority to regulate. (3) (a) The Administrative Rules Review Committee shall have omnibus legislation prepared for consideration by the Legislature during its annual general session. (b) The omnibus legislation shall be substantially in the following form: "All rules of Utah state agencies are reauthorized except for the following:". (c) Before sending the legislation to the governor for the governor's action, the Administrative Rules Review Committee may send a letter to the governor and to the agency explaining specifically why the committee believes any rule shoul d not be reauthorized. (d) For the purpose of this section, the entire rule, a single section, or any complete paragraph of a rule may be excepted for reauthorization in the omnibus legislation considered by the Legislature. (4) The Legislature's reauthorization of a rule by legislation does not constitute le gislative approval of the rule, nor is it admissible in any proceeding as evidence of legislative intent. (5) (a) If an agency believes that a rule that has not been reauthorized by the Legislature or that will be allowed to expire should continue in full force and effect and is a rule within their authorized rulemaking power, the agency may seek the governor's declaration extending the rule beyond the expiration date. (b) In seeking the extension, the agency shall submit a petition to the gove rnor that affirmatively

states: (i) that the rule is necessary; and (ii) a citation to the source of its authority to make the rule. (c) (i) If the governor finds that the necessity does exist, and that the agency has the authority to make the rule, the governor may declare the rule to be extended by publishing that declaration in the Administrative Rules Bulletin on or before April 15 of that year. (ii) The declaration shall set forth the rule to be extended, the reasons the extension is necessary, and a citation to the source of the agency's authority to make the rule. (d) If the omnibus bill required by Subsection (3) fails to pass both houses of the Legislature or is found to have a technical legal defect preventing reauthorization of administrative rules intended to be reauthorized by the Legislature, the governor ma y declare all rules to be extended by publishing a single declaration in the Administrative Rules Bulletin on or before June 15 without meeting requirements of Subsections (5)(b) and (c). Renumbered and Amended by C hapter 382, Laws of Utah 2008General Session, effective May 5, 2008 (formerly Section 63-46a11.5)



### Part 6. Judicial Review.

63G-3-601. Interested parties -- Petition for agency action. (1) As used in this s ection, "initiate rulemaking proceedings" means the filing, for the purposes of publication in accordance with Subsection 63G-3-301(4), of an agency's proposed rule to implement a petition for the making, amendment, or repeal of a ruleas provided in this section. (2) An interested person may petition an agency to request the making, amendmen t, or repeal of a rule. (3) The division shall prescribe by rule the form for petitions and the procedure for their submission, consideration, and disposition. (4) A statement shall accompany the proposed rule, or proposed amendment or repeal of a rule, demonstrating that the proposed action is within the jurisdiction of the agency and appropriate to the powers of the agency. (5) Within 60 days after submission of a petition, the agency shall either deny the petition in writing, stating its reasons for the denial, or initiate rulemaking proceedings. (6) (a) If the petition is submitted to a board that has been granted rulemaking authority by the Legislature, the board shall, within 45 days of the submission of the petition, place the petition on it s agenda for review. (b) Within 80 days of the submission of the petition, the board shall either: (i) deny the petition in writing stating its reasons for denial; or (ii) initiate ru lemaking proceedings. (7) If the agency or board has not provided the petitioner written notice that the agency has denied the petition or initiated rulemaking proceedings within the time limitations specified in Subsection (5) or (6) respectively, the petitioner may seek a writ of mandamus in state district court. Renumbered and Amended by Chapter 382, Laws of Utah 2008 General Session, effective May 5, 2008 (formerly Section 63-46a-12)

63G-3-602. Judicial challeng e to administrative rules. (1) (a) Any person aggrieved by a rule may obtain judicial review of the rule by filing a complaint with the county clerk in the district court where the person resides or in the district court in Salt Lake County.Utah Administrative Rulema king Act, 2009 Page 9

9 (b) Any person aggrieved by an agency's failure to comply with Section 63G-3-201 may obtain judicial review of the agency's failure to comply by filing a complaint with the clerk of the district court where the person resides or in the district court in Salt Lake County. (2) (a) Except as provided in Subsection (2)(b), a person seeking judicial review under this section shall exhaust that person's administrative remedies by complying with the requirements of Section 63G-3-601 before filing the complaint. (b) When seeking judicial review of a rule, the person need not exhaust that person's administrative remedies if: (i) less than six months has passed since the date that the rule became effective and the person had submitted verbal or written comments on the rule to the agency during the public comment period; (ii) a statute granting rulemaking authority expressly exempts rules made under authority of that statute from compliance with Section 63G-3- 601; or (iii) compliance with Section 63G-3-601 would cause the person irreparable harm. (3) (a) In addition to the information required by the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, a complaint filed under this section shall contain: (i) the name and mailing address of the plaintiff; (ii) the name and mailing address of the defendant agency; (iii) the name and mailing address of any other party joined in the action as a defendant; (iv) the text of the rule or proposed rule, if

any; (v) an allegation that the person filing the complaint has either exhausted the administrative remedies by complying with Section 63G-3-601 or met the requirements for waiver of exhaustion of administrative remedies established by Subsection (2)(b); (vi) the relief sought; and (vii) factual and lega l allegations supporting the relief sought. (b) (i) The plaintiff shall serve a summons and a copy of the complaint as required by the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. (ii) The defendants shall file a responsive pleading as required by the Utah Rules of Civil Procedures. (iii) The agency shall file the administrative record of the rule, if any, with its responsive pleading. (4) The district court may grant relief to the petitioner by: (a) declaring the rule invalid, if the court finds that: (i) the rule violates c onstitutional or statutory law or the agency does not have legal authority to make the rule; (ii) the rule is not supported by substantial evidence when viewed in light of the whole administrative record; or (iii) the agency did not follow proper rulemaking procedure; (b) declaring the rule nonapplicable to the petitioner; (c) remanding the matter to the agency for compliance with proper rulemaking procedures or further fact-finding; (d) ordering the agency to comply with Section 63G-3-201; (e) issuing a judicial stay or injunction to enjoin the agency from illegal action or action that would cause irreparable harm to the petitioner; or (f) any combination of Subsections (4)(a) through (e). (5) If the plaintiff meets the requirements of Subsection (2)(b), the district court may review and act on a complaint under this section whether or no t the plaintiff has requested the agency review under Section 63G-3-601. Renumbered and Amended by C hapter 382, Laws of Utah 2008General Session, effective May 5, 2008 (formerly Section 63-46a12.1)

63G-3-603. Time for contesting a rule -- Statute of limitations. (1) A proceeding to contest any rule on the ground of noncompliance with the procedural requirements of this chapter shall commence within two years of the effective date of the rule. (2) A proceeding to contest any rule on the ground of not being supported by substantial evidence when viewed in light of the whole administrative record shall commence within four years of the effective date of the challenged action. (3) A proceeding to contest any rule on the basis that a change to the rule made under Subsection 63G-3-402(2) or (3) substantively changed the ru le shall be commenced within two years of the date the change was made. Renumbered and Amended by C hapter 382, Laws of Utah 2008 General Session, effective May 5, 2008 (formerly Section 63-46a-14)



### Part 7. Official Compil ation of Administrative Rules.

63G-3-701. Utah Administrative Code as official compilation of rules -- Judicial notice. The code shall be received by all the judges, public officers, commissions, and departments of the state government as evidence of the administrative law of the state of Utah and as an authorized compilation of the administrative law of Utah. Al l courts shall take judicial notice of the code and its provisions. Renumbered and Amended by C hapter 382, Laws of Utah 2008 General Session, effective May 5, 2008 (formerly Section 63-46a-16)

63G-3-702. Utah Administrative Code -- Organization -- Official compilation. (1) The Utah Administrative Code shall be divided into three parts: (a) titles, whose number shall begin with "R"; (b) rules; andUtah Administrative Rulemaki ng Act, 2009 Page 10

10 (c) sections. (2) All sections contained in the code are referenced by a three-part number indicating its location in the code. (3) The division shall maintain the official compilation of the code and is the state-designated repository for administrative rules. If a dispute arises in which there is more than one version of a rule, the latest effective version on file with the division is considered the correct, current version. Renumbered and Amended by C hapter 382, Laws of Utah 2008 General Session, effective May 5, 2008 (formerly Section 63-46a-9.6)

NOTE: Source http://le.utah.gov /~code/TITLE63G/63G03.zip accessed 07/02/2009. Legislative action information added by the Division of Administrative Rules based on information from HistoryInfo.txt provided by Legislative Research and General Counsel, 07/02/2009.

### Administrative Services

August 1, 2009 Utah Administrative Code - 1 - R15. Administrative Services, Administrative Rules. R15-1. Administrative Rule Hearings. R15-1-1. Authority. (1) This rule establishes procedures and standards for administrative rule hearings as required by Subsection 63G-3-402(1)(a). (2) The procedures of this rule constitute the minimum requirements for mandatory administrative rule hearings. Additional procedures may be required to comply with any other governing statute, federal law, or federal regulation.

R15-1-2. Definitions. (1) Terms used in this rule are defined in Section
63G-3-102. (2) In addition: (a) "hearing" means an administrative rule hearing; and (b) "officer" means an administrative rule hearing officer.

R15-1-3. Purpose. (1) The purpose of this rule is to provide: (a) procedures for agency hearings on proposed administrative rules or rules changes, or on the need for a rule or change; (b) opportunity for public comment on rules; and (c) opportunity for agency response to public concerns about rules.

R15-1-4. When Agencies Hold Hearings. (1) Agencies shall hold hearings as required by Subsection 63G-3-302(2). (2) Agencies may hold hearings: (a) during the public comment period on a proposed rule, after its publication in the bulletin and prior to its effective date; (b) before initiating rulemaking procedures under Title 63G, Chapter 3, to promote public input prior to a rule's publication; (c) during a regular or extraordinary meeting of a state board, council, or commission, in order to avoid separate and additional meetings; or (d) to hear any public petition for a rule change as provided by Section 63G-3-601. (3) Voluntary hearings, as described in this section, follow the procedures prescribed by this rule or any other procedures the agency may provide by rule. (4) Mandatory hearings, as described in this section, follow the procedures prescribed by this rule and any additional requirements of state or federal law. (5) If an agency holds a mandatory hearing under the procedures of this rule during the public comment period described in Subsection 63G-3- 301(6), no second hearing is required for the purpose of comment on the same rule or change considered at the first hearing.

R15-1-5. Hearing Procedures. (1) Notice. (a) An agency shall provide notice of a hearing by: (i) publishing the hearing date, time, place, and subject in the bulletin; (ii) mailing copies of

### Administrative Services

August 1, 2009 Utah Administrative Code - 2 - the notice directly to persons who have petitioned for a hearing or rule changes under Section 63G-3-302 or 63G-3- 601, respectively; and (iii) posting for at least 24 hours in a place in the agency's offices which is frequented by the public. (b) If a rules hearing becomes mandatory after the agency has published the proposed rule in the bulletin, the agency shall notify in writing persons requesting the hearing of the time and place. (c) An agency may provide additional notice of a hearing, and shall give further notice as may otherwise be required by law. (2) Hearing Officer. (a) The agency head shall appoint as hearing officer a person qualified to conduct fairly the hearing. (b) No restrictions apply to this appointment except the officer shall know rulemaking procedure. (c) However, if a state board, council, or commission is responsible for agency rulemaking, and holds a hearing, a member or the body's designee may be the hearing officer. (3) Time. The officer shall open the hearing at the announced time and place and permit comment for a minimum of one hour. The hearing may be extended or continued to another day as necessary in the judgment of the officer. (4) Comment. (a) At the opening of the hearing, the officer shall explain the subject and purpose of the hearing and invite orderly, germane comment from all persons in attendance. The officer may set time limits for speakers and shall ensure equitable use of time. (b) The agency shall have a representative at the hearing, other than the officer, who is familiar with the rule at issue and who can respond to requests for information by those in attendance. (c) The officer shall invite written comment to be submitted at the hearing or after the hearing, within a reasonable time. Written comment shall be attached to the hearing minutes. (d) The officer shall conduct the hearing as an open, informal, orderly, and informative meeting. Oaths, cross-examination, and rules of evidence are not required. (5) The Hearing Record. (a) The officer shall cause to be recorded the name, address, and relevant affiliation of all persons speaking at the hearing, and cause an electronic or mechanical verbatim recording of the hearing to be made, or make a brief summary, of their remarks. (b) The hearing record consists of a copy of the proposed rule or rule change, submitted written comment, the hearing recording or summary, the list of persons speaking at the hearing, and other pertinent documents as determined by the agency. (c) The hearing officer shall, as soon as practicable, assemble the hearing record and transmit it to the agency for consideration. (d) The hearing record shall be kept with and as part

### Administrative Services

August 1, 2009 Utah Administrative Code - 3 - of the rule's administrative record in a file available at the agency offices for public inspection.

R15-1-8. Decision on an Issue Regarding Rulemaking Procedure. (1) When a hearing issue requires a decision regarding rulemaking procedure, the officer shall submit a written request for a decision to the director as soon as practicable after, or after recessing, the hearing, as provided in Section R15-5-6. The director shall reply to the agency head as provided in Subsection R15-5-6(2). The director's decision shall be included in the hearing record.

R15-1-9. Appeal and Judicial Review. (1) Persons may appeal the decision of the agency head or the division by petitioning the district court for judicial review as provided by law.

KEY: administrative law, government hearings Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: June 1, 1996 Notice of Continuation: September 29, 2005 Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 63G-3-402

R15-2. Public Petitioning for Rulemaking. R15-2-1. Authority. As required by Subsection 63G-3-601(2), this rule prescribes the form and procedures for submission, consideration, and disposition of petitions requesting the making, amendment, or repeal of an administrative rule.

R15-2-2. Definitions. (1) Terms used in this rule are defined in Section
63G-3-102. (2) Other terms are defined as follows: (a) "rule change" means: (i) making a new rule; (ii) amending, repealing, or repealing and reenacting an existing rule; (iii) amending a proposed rule further by filing a change in proposed rule under the provisions of Section 63G-3-303; (iv) allowing a proposed (new, amended, repealed, or repealed and reenacted) rule or change in proposed rule to lapse; or (v) any combination of the above. (b) "petitioner" means an interested person who submits a petition to an agency pursuant to Section 63G-3-601 and this rule.

R15-2-3. Petition Procedure. (1) The petitioner shall send the petition to the head of the agency authorized by law to make the rule change requested. (2) The agency receiving the petition shall stamp the petition with the date of receipt.

R15-2-4. Petition Form. The petition shall: (a) be clearly designated "petition for a rule change"; (b) state the petitioner's name; (c) state the petitioner's interest in the

### Administrative Services

August 1, 2009 Utah Administrative Code - 4 - rule, including relevant affiliation, if any; (d) include a statementas required by Subsection 63G3-601(4) regarding the requested rule change; (e) state the approximate wording of the requested rule change; (f) describe the reason for the rule change; (g) include an address, an E-mail address when available, and telephone where the petitioner can be reached during regular business hours; and (h) be signed by the petitioner.

R15-2-5. Petition Consideration And Disposition. (1) The agency head or designee shall: (a) review and consider the petition; (b) write a response to the petition stating: (i) that the petition is denied and reasons for denial,

or (ii) the date when the agency is initiating a rule change consistent with the intent of the petition; and (c) send the response to the petitioner within the timeframe provided by Section 63G3-601. (2) The petitioned agency may, within the timeframe provided by Section 63G3-601, interview the petitioner, hold a public hearing on the petition, or take any action the agency, in its judgment, deems necessary to provide the petition due consideration. (3) The agency shall retain the petition and a copy of the agency's response as part of the administrative record. (4) The agency shall mail copies of its decision to all persons who petitioned for a rule change.

KEY: administrative law Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: December 25, 2006 Notice of Continuation: September 29, 2005 Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 63G-3-601

R15-3. Definitional Clarification of Administrative Rule. R15-3-1. Authority, Purpose, and Definitions. (1) This rule is authorized under Subsection 63G-3-402(1) which requires the division to administer the Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act, Title 63G, Chapter 3. (2) This rule clarifies when rulemaking is required, and requirements for incorporation by reference within rules. (3) Terms used in this rule are defined in Section
63G-3-102.

R15-3-2. Agency Discretion. (1) A rule may restrict agency discretion to prevent agency personnel from exceeding their scope of employment, or committing arbitrary action or application of standards, or to provide due process for persons affected by agency actions. (2) A rule may authorize agency discretion that sets limits, standards, and scope of employment within which a range of actions may be

### Administrative Services

August 1, 2009 Utah Administrative Code - 5 - applied by agency personnel. A rule may also establish criteria for granting exceptions to the standards or procedures of the rule when, in the judgment of authorized personnel, documented circumstances warrant. (3) An agency may have written policies which broadly prescribe goals and guidelines. Policies are not rules unless they meet the criteria for rules set forth under Section 63G-3-201(2). (4) Within the limits prescribed by Sections 63G-3- 201 and 63G-3-602, an agency has full discretion regarding the substantive content of its rules. The division has authority over nonsubstantivecontent under Subsections 63G3-402(2) and (3), and 63G-3- 403(2) and (3), rulemaking procedures, and the physical format of rules for compilation in the Utah Administrative Code.

R15-3-3. Use of Incorporation by Reference in Rules. (1) An agency incorporating materials by reference as permitted under Subsection 63G-3-201(7) shall comply with the following standards: (a) The rule shall state specifically that the cited material is "incorporated by reference." (b) If the material contains options, or is modified in its application, the options selected and modifications made shall be stated in the rule. (c) If the incorporated material is substantively changed at a later time, and the agency intends to enforce the revised material, the agency shall amend its rule through rulemaking procedures to incorporate by reference any applicable changes as soon as practicable. (d) In accordance with Subsection 63G-3-201(7)(c), an agency shall describe substantive changes that appear in the materials incorporated by reference as part of the "summary of rule or change" in the rule analysis. (2) An agency shall comply with copyright requirements when it provides the division a copy of material incorporated by reference.

R15-3-4. Computer-Prohibited Material. (1) All rules shall be in a format that permits their compatibility with the division's computer system and compilation into the Utah Administrative Code. (2) Rules may not contain maps, charts, graphs, diagrams, illustrations, forms, or similar material. (3) The division shall issue and provide to agencies instructions and standards for formatting rules.

R15-3-5. Statutory Provisions that Require Rulemaking Pursuant to Subsection 63G-3- 301(13). For the purposes of Subsection 63G-3-301(13), the phrase "statutory provision that requires the rulemaking" means a state statutory provision that explicitly mandates rulemaking.

KEY: administrative law

### Administrative Services

August 1, 2009 Utah Administrative Code - 6 - Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: April 30, 2007 Notice of Continuation: September 29, 2005 Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 63G-3- 201; 63G-3-301; 63G-3-402

R15-4. Administrative Rulemaking Procedures. R15-4-1. Authority and Purpose. (1) This rule establishes procedures for filing and publication of agency rules under Sections63G-3-301, 63G-3-303, and 63G3-304, as authorized under Subsection 63G-3-402(1). (2) The procedures of this rule constitute minimum requirements for rule filing and publication. Other governing statutes, federal laws, or federal regulations may require additional rule filing and publication procedures.

R15-4-2. Definitions. (1) Terms used in this rule are defined in Section
63G-3-102. (2) Other terms are defined as follows: (a) "Anniversary date" means the date that is five years from the original effective date of the rule, or the date that is five years from the date the agency filed with the division the most recent five-year reviewrequired under Subsection 63G3-305(3), whichever is sooner. (b) "Digest" means the Utah State Digest that summarizes the content of the bulletin as required by Subsection 63G-3-402(1)(f); (c) "Codify" means the process of collecting and arranging administrative rules systematically in the Utah Administrative Code, and includes the process of verifying that each amendment was marked as required under Subsection 63G-3-301(2)(b); (d) "Compliance cost" means expenditures a regulated person will incur if a rule or change is made effective; (e) "Cost" means the aggregated expenses persons as a class affected by a rule will incur if a rule or change is made effective; (f) "eRules" means the Division's administrative rule filing application that agencies use to file rules and notices; (g) "Savings" means: (i) an aggregated monetary amount that will no longer be incurred by persons as a class if a rule or change is made effective; (ii) an aggregated monetary amount that will be refunded or rebated if a rule or change is made effective; (iii) an aggregated monetary amount of anticipated revenues to be generated for state budgets, local governments, or both if a rule or change is made effective;

or (iv) any combination of these aggregated monetary
amounts. (h) "Unmarked change" means a change made to rule text that was not marked as required by Subsection 63G-3- 301(2)(b).

R15-4-3. Publication Dates and Deadlines. (1) For the purposes of Subsections 63G-3-301(2) and

### Administrative Services

August 1, 2009 Utah Administrative Code - 7 - 63G-3-303(1), an agency shall file its rule and rule analysis by 11:59:59 p.m. on the fifteenth day of the month for publication in the bulletin and digest issued on the first of the next month, and by 11:59:59 p.m. on the first day of the month for publication on the fifteenth of the same month. (a) If the first or fifteenth day is a Saturday, or a Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, or Friday holiday, the agency shall file the rule and rule analysis by 11:59:59 p.m. on the previous regular business day. (b) If the first or fifteenth day is a Sunday or Monday holiday, the agency shall file the rule and rule analysis by 11:59:59 p.m. on the next regular business day. (2) For all purposes, the official date of publication for the bulletin and digest shall be the first and fifteenth days of each month.

R15-4-4. Thirty-day Comment Period for a Proposed Rule and a Change in Proposed Rule. (1) For the purposes of Sections 63G-3-301 and 63G-3- 303, "30 days" shall be computed by: (a) counting the day after publication of the rule as the first day; and (b) counting the thirtieth consecutive day after the day of publication as the thirtieth day, unless (c) the thirtieth consecutive day is a Saturday, Sunday, or holiday, in which event the thirtieth day is the next regular business day. R15-4-5a. Notice of the Effective Date for a Proposed Rule. (1)(a) Pursuant to Subsection 63G-3-301(9), upon expiration of the comment period designated on the rule analysis and filed with the rule, and before expiration of 120 days after publication of a proposed rule, the agency proposing the rule shall notify the division of the date the rule is to become effective and enforceable. (b) The agency shall notify the division after determining that the proposed rule, in the form published, shall be the final form of the rule, and after informing the division of any nonsubstantive changes in the rule as provided for in Section R15-4-
6. (2)(a) The agency shall notify the division by filing with the division a Notice of Effective Date form using eRules. (b) If the eRules Notice of Effective Date form is unavailable to the agency, the agency may notify the division by any other form of written communication clearly identifying the proposed rule, stating the date the rule was filed with the division or published in the bulletin, and stating its effective date. (3) The date designated as the effective date shall be: (a) at least seven days after the comment period specified on the rule analysis; or (b) if the agency formally extends the comment period for a proposed rule by publishing a subsequent notice

### Administrative Services

August 1, 2009 Utah Administrative Code - 8 - in an issue of the bulletin, at least seven days after the extended comment period. (4) The division shall publish notice of the effective date in the next issue of the bulletin. There is no publication deadline for a notice of effective date for a proposed rule, nor requirement that it be published prior to the effective date.

R15-4-5b. Notice of the Effective Date for a Change in Proposed Rule. (1)(a) Upon expiration of the 30-day period required by Section 63G-3-303, and before expiration of the 120th day after publication of a change in proposed rule, the agency promulgating the rule shall notify the division of the date the rule is to become effective and enforceable. (b) The agency shall notify the division after determining that the rule text as published is the final form of the rule, and after informing the division of any nonsubstantive changes in the rule as provided for in Section R15-4-6. (2)(a) The agency shall notify the division by filing with the division a Notice of Effective Date form using eRules. (b) If the eRules Notice of Effective Date form is unavailable to the agency, the agency may notify the division by any other form of written communication clearly identifying the change in proposed rule and any rules upon which the change in proposed rule is dependent, stating the date the rules were filed with the division or published in the bulletin, and stating the effective date. (3) The date designated as the effective date shall be: (a) at least 30 days after the publication date of the rule in the bulletin, or (b) if the agency designated a comment period, at least seven days after a comment period designated by the agency on the rule analysis or formally extended by publication of a subsequent notice in the bulletin. (4) The division shall publish notice of the effective date in the next issue of the bulletin. There is no publication deadline for the notice of effective date for a change in proposed rule, nor requirement that it be published prior to the effective date.

R15-4-6. Nonsubstantive Changes in Rules. (1) Pursuant to Subsections 63G-3-201(4)(d) and 63G-3-303(2), for the purpose of making rule changes that are grammatical or do not materially affect the application or outcome of agency procedures and standards, agencies shall comply with the procedures of this section. (2) The agency proposing a change shall determine if the change is substantive or nonsubstantive according to the criteria cited in Subsection R15-4-6(1). (a) The agency may seek the advice of the Attorney General or the division, but the agency is responsible for

### Administrative Services

August 1, 2009 Utah Administrative Code - 9 - compliance with the cited criteria. (3) Without complying with regular rulemaking procedures, an agency may make nonsubstantive changes in: (a) proposed rules already published in the bulletin and digest but not made effective, or (b) rules already effective. (4) To make a nonsubstantive change in a rule, the agency shall: (a) notify the division by filing with the division the form designated for nonsubstantive changes; (b) include with the notice the rule text to be changed, with changes marked as required by Section R15-4- 9; and (c) include with the notice the name of the agency head or designee authorizing the change. (5) A nonsubstantive change becomes effective on the date the division makes the change in the Utah Administrative Code. (6) The division shall record the nonsubstantive change and its effective date in the administrative rules register.

R15-4-7. Substantive Changes in Proposed Rules. (1) Pursuant to Section 63G-3-303, agencies shall comply with the procedures of this section when making a substantive change in a proposed rule. (a) The procedures of this section apply if: (i) the agency determines a change in the rule is necessary; (ii) the change is substantive under the criteria of Subsection 63G-3-102(19); (iii) the rule was published as a proposal in the bulletin and digest; and (iv) the rule has not been made effective under theprocedures of Subsection 63G3-303(1)(d) and Section R15-4-
5. (b) If the rule is already effective, the agency shall comply with regular rulemaking procedures. (2) To make a substantive change in a proposed rule, the agency shall file with the division: (a) a rule analysis, marked to indicate the agency intends to change a rule already published, and describing the change and reasons for it; and (b) a copy of the proposed rule previously published in the bulletin marked to show only those changes made since the proposed rule was previously published as described in Section R15-4-9. (3) The division shall publish the rule analysis in the next issue of the bulletin, subject to the publication deadlines of Section R15-4-3. The division may also publish the changed text of the rule. (4) The agency may make a change in proposed rule effective by following the requirements of Section R15-4- 5, or may further amend the rule by following the procedures of Sections R15-4-6
or R15-4-7.

R15-4-8. Temporary 120-day Rules.

### Administrative Services

August 1, 2009 Utah Administrative Code - 10 - (1) Pursuant to Section 63G-3-304, for the purpose of filing a temporary rule, an agency shall comply with the procedures of this section. (2) The agency proposing a temporary rule shall determine if the need for the rule complies with the criteria of Subsection 63G-3- 304(1). (a) The division interprets the criteria of Subsection 63G-3-304(1) to include under "welfare" any substantial material loss to the classes of persons or agencies the agency is mandated to regulate, serve, or protect. (3) The agency shall use the same procedures for filing and publishing a temporary rule as for a permanent rule, except: (a) the rule shall become effective and enforceable on the day and hour it is recorded by the division unless the agency designates a later effective date on the rule analysis; (b) no comment period is
necessary; (c) no public hearing is necessary; and (d) the rule shall expire 120 days after the rule's effective date unless the filing agency notifies the division, on the form or by memorandum, of an earlier expiration date. (4) A temporary rule is separate and distinct from a rule filed under regular rulemaking procedures, though the language of the two rules may be identical. To make a temporary rule permanent, the agency shall propose a separate rule for regular rulemaking. (5) When a temporary rule and a similar regular rule are in effect at the same time, any conflict between the provisions of the two are resolved in favor of the rule with the most recent effective date, unless the agency designates otherwise as part of the rule analysis. (6) A temporary rule has the full force and effect of a permanent rule while in effect, but a temporary rule is not codified in the Utah Administrative Code.

R15-4-9. Underscoring and Striking Out. (1) (a) Pursuant to Subsection 63G-3-301(2)(b), an agency shall underscore language to be added and strike out language to be deleted in proposed rules. (b) Consistent with Subsection 63G-3-301(2)(b), an agency shall underscore language to be added and strike out language to be deleted in changes in proposed rules, 120-day rules, and nonsubstantive changes. (c) Consistent with legislative bill drafting technique, the struck out language shall be surrounded by brackets. (2) When an agency proposes to make a new rule or section, the entire proposed text shall be underscored. (3)(a) When an agency proposes to repeal a complete rule it shall include as part of the information provided in the rule analysis a brief summary of the deleted language and a brief explanation of why the rule is being repealed.

### Administrative Services

August 1, 2009 Utah Administrative Code - 11 - (b) The agency shall include with the rule analysis a copy of the text to be deleted in one of the following formats: (i) each page annotated "repealed in its entirety" or (ii) the entire text struck out in its entirety and surrounded by one set of brackets. (c) The division shall not publish repealed rules unless space is available within the page limits of the bulletin. (4) When an agency fails to mark a change as described in this section, the director or his designee may refuse to codify the change. When determining whether or not to codify an unmarked change, the director shall consider: (a) whether the unmarked change is substantive or nonsubstantive; and (b) if the purpose of public notification has been adequately served. (5) The director's refusal to codify an unmarked change means that the change is not operative for the purposes of Section 63G-3-701 and that the agency must comply with regular rulemaking procedures to make the change.

R15-4-10. Estimates of Anticipated Cost or Savings, and Compliance Cost. (1) Pursuant toSubsections 63G-3-301(3), 63G3-303(1), 63G-3-304(2), and 53C-1-201(3), when an agency files a proposed rule, change in proposed rule, 120-day (emergency) rule, or expedited rule and provides anticipated cost or savings, and compliance cost information in the rule analysis, the agency shall: (a) estimate the incremental cost or savings and incremental compliance cost associated with the changes proposed by the rule or change; (b) estimate the incremental cost or savings and incremental compliance cost in dollars, except as otherwise provided in Subsections R15-4-10(4) and (5); (c) indicate that the amount is either a cost or a savings; and (d) estimate the incremental cost or savings expected to accrue to "state budgets," "local governments," "small businesses," and "persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities" as aggregated cost or savings; (2) In addition, an
agency may: (a) provide a narrative description of anticipated cost or savings, and compliance cost; (b) compare anticipated cost or savings, and compliance cost figures, for the rule or change to: (i) current budgeted costs associated with the existing rule, (ii) figures reported on a fiscal note attached to a related legislative bill, or (iii) both (i) and (ii). (3) If an agency chooses to provide comparison figures, it shall clearly distinguish comparison figures from the anticipated cost or savings, and compliance cost figures. (4) If dollar estimates are unknown or not available,

### Administrative Services

August 1, 2009 Utah Administrative Code - 12 - or the obtaining thereof would impose a substantial unbudgeted hardship on the agency, the agency may substitute a reasonednarrative description of costrelated actions required by the rule or change, and explain the reason or reasons for the substitution. (5) If no cost, savings, or compliance cost is associated with the rule or change, an agency may enter "none," "no impact," or similar words in the rule analysis followed by a written explanation of how the agency estimated that there would be no impact, or how the proposed rule, or changes made to an existing rule does not apply to "state budgets," "local government," "small businesses," "persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local governmental entities," or any combination of these. (6) If an agency does not provide an estimate of cost, savings, compliance cost, or a reasoned narrative description of cost information; or a written explanation as part of the rule analysis in compliance with this section, the Division may, after making an attempt to obtain the required information, refuse to register and publish the rule or change. If the Division refuses to register and publish a rule or change, it shall: (a) return the rule or change to the agency with a notice indicating that the Division has refused to register and publish the rule or change; (b) identify the reason or reasons why the Division refused to register and publish the rule or change; and (c) indicate the filing deadlines for the next issue of the Bulletin.

KEY: administrative law Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: August 24, 2007 Notice of Continuation: September 29, 2005 Authorizing, and Implementedor Interpreted Law: 63-46a1063G-3-301; 63-46a-463G-3- 303; 63-46a-663G-3-304; 63G-3- 402

R15-5. Administrative Rules Adjudicative Proceedings. R15-5-1. Purpose. (1) This rule provides the procedures for informal adjudicative proceedings governing: (a) appeal and review of a decision by the division not to publish an agency's proposed rule or rule change or not to register an agency's notice of effective date; and (b) a determination by the division whether an agency rule meets the procedural requirements of Title 63G, Chapter 3, the Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act. (2) The informal procedures of this rule apply to all other division actions for which an adjudicative proceeding may be required.

R15-5-2. Authority. This rule is required by Sections 63G-4-202 and 63G-4- 203, and is enacted under the authority of Subsection 63G-3- 402(1)(m) and Sections 63G-4-

### Administrative Services

August 1, 2009 Utah Administrative Code - 13 - 202, 63G-4-203, and 63G-4-503.

R15-5-3. Definitions. (1) The terms used in this rule are defined in Section 63G-4-103. (2) In addition, "digest" means the Utah State Digest which summarizes the content of the bulletin asrequired under Subsection 63G3-402(1)(f).

R15-5-4. Refusal to Publish or Register a Rule or Rule Change. (1) The division shall not publish a proposed rule or rule change when the division determines the agency has not met the requirements of Title 63G, Chapter 3, or of Rules
R15-3 or R15-4. (2) The division shall not register an agency's notice of effective date, nor codify the rule or rule change in the Utah Administrative Code, if the agency exceeds the 120-day limit required by Subsection 63G-3-301(6)(a) as interpreted in Section R15-4-
5. (3) The division shall notify the agency of a refusal to publish or register a rule or rule change, and shall advise and assist the agency in correcting any error or omission, and in re-filing to meet statutory and regulatory criteria.

R15-5-5. Appeal of a Refusal to Publish or Register a Rule or Rule Change. (1) An agency may request a review of a division refusal to publish or register a rule or rule change by filing a written petition for review with the division director. (2) The division director shall grant or deny the petition within 20 days, and respond in writing giving the reasons for any denial. (3) The agency may appeal the decision of the division director by filing a written appeal to the Executive Director of the Department of Administrative Services within 20 days of receipt of the division director's decision. The Executive Director shall respond within 20 days affirming or reversing the division director's decision.

R15-5-6. Determining the Procedural Validity of a Rule. (1) A person may contest the procedural validity, or request a determination of whether a rule meets the requirements of Title 63G, Chapter 3, by filing a written petition with the division. (a) The rule at issue may be a proposed rule or an effective rule. (b) The petition must be received by the division within the two-year limit set by Section 63G-3-603. (c) The petition may emanate from a rulemaking hearing as in Section R15-1-8. (d) The petition shall specify the rule or rule change at issue and reasons why the petitioner deems it procedurally flawed or invalid. (e) The petition shall be accompanied by any documents the division should consider in reaching its decision. (f) The petition shall be signed and designate a

### Administrative Services

August 1, 2009 Utah Administrative Code - 14 - telephone number where the petitioner can be contacted during regular business hours. (2) The division shall respond to the petition in writing within 20 days of its receipt. (a) The division shall research all records pertaining to the rule or rule change at issue. (b) The response of the division shall state whether the rule is procedurally valid or invalid and how the agency may remedy any defect. (c) The division shall send a copy of the petition and its response to the pertinent agency. (3) The petitioner may request reconsideration of the division's findings by filing a written request for reconsideration with the division director. (a) The director may respond to the request in writing. (b) If the petitioner receives no response within 20 days, the request is denied.

R15-5-7. Remedies Resulting from an Adjudicative Proceeding. (1) A rule the division determines is procedurally invalid shall be stricken from the Utah Administrative Code and notice of its deletion published in the next issues of the bulletin and digest. (2) The division shall notify the pertinent agencyand assist the agency in refiling or otherwise remedying the procedural omission or error in the rule. (3) A rule the division determines is procedurally valid shall be published and registered promptly.

KEY: administrative procedures, administrative law Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: June 1, 1996 Notice of Continuation: September 29, 2005 Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 63G-3- 402; 63G-4-202; 63G-4-203; 63G-4-503

# Proposed Rule

# •

•

• 1 

### 2 3 

### 4 5 6 

### 7 8
9 

### 10 11 

### 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 

### 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 

### 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46

. 47

48 49 50 51 52 R307-401-15 October 5, 2012

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. R307-401. Permit: New and Modified Sources. R307-401'-15. Air Strippers and Soil Venting Projects. 

### Page 1 of 2

(1) The owner or operator of an air stripper or soil venting system that is used to remediate contaminated groundwater or soil is exempt from the notice of intent and approval order requirements of R307-401-5 through 8 if the following conditions

are met: (a) the estimated total air emissions of volatile organic compounds from a given project are less than the de minimis

em i ssions listed in R307-401-9 (1) (a), and (b) the level of any one hazardous air pollutant or any combination of hazardous air pollutants is below the levels listed in R307-410-5 (1) (d). ( 2) The owner or operator shall submit documentation

. . that the project meets the exemption requirements in R307-401-15 (1) [above ]to the director prior to beginning the remediation project. (3) After beginning the soil remediation project, the owner

or operator shall submit emissions information to the director to verify that the emission rates of the volatile organic compounds and hazardous air pollutants in R307-401-15 (1) [above ] are not

· exceeded. (a) Emissions estimates of volatile organic compounds [a£€l: ,,.----"'----'-- 

### hazardous air pollutants ]shall be based on test data obtained in accordance with the test method in the EPA document SW-846, Test #**[~]** 

### 8260c or 8261a, or the most recent EPA revision of either
test method if approved by the director. (b) Emissions estimates of hazardous air pollutants shall be based on test data obtained in accordance with the test method in EPA document SW-846, Test #8021B or [other]the most recent EPA revision of the test [ or monitoring] method 

### ii__ approved by the director. ( c) 

### emissions pollutants sampling. Results of the test and calculated annual quantity of of volatile organic compounds and hazardous air shall be submitted to the director within one month of

(d) The test samples shall be drawn on intervals of no less**----~** 

### than twenty-eight days and no more than thirty-one days (i.e., monthly) for the first quarter, quarterly for the first year, and semi-annually thereafter or as determined necessary by the director. (4) The following control devices do not require a notice of intent or approval order when used in relation to an air stripper

or soil venting project exempted under R307-401-15: (a) thermodestruction unit with a rated input capacity of less than five million BTU per hour using no other auxiliary fuel than natural gas or LPG, or (b) carbon adsorption unit

.

KEY: air pollution, permits, approval orders, greenhouse gases Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: [January 1,

### 1 2 3 

### 4 

### R30 7- 401

- 15 October 5, 2012

2-W:-±]2013 Notice of Continuation: July 13, 2007 Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted 19-2-108 

### Pa g e 2 o f 2 

# •

Law: 19-2-104 (3) 

### (q) ;



# •

•NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

HIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 01/07/2013

Carol Lear, Director, School Law and

ducation, Administration.
9. Licensure of Student Teachers and Interns.

-1. Definitions.
"Board" means the Utah State Board of Education.

"Cooperating teacher" means a licensed teacher


### an [seh:MI distriet tlf eltttrter setttJtJl]LEA who is qualified to irectly supervise a student teacher or intern during the period the stll ent teacher or intern is assigned to the [distriet]LEA. C. ' tern" means a teacher education student, who, in an advanced stag of preparation, usually as a culminating experience,

may be employ d in a school setting for a period of up to one year and receive sal proportionate to the service rendered. 

### An intern is supervised p · arily by the school system but with a continuing relationship with college personnel and following a planned

program designe to produce a demonstrably competent professional.
D. "LEA' mean a local educati n a enc incl d·n local school s/ bli hool di tricts ch er schools an for

e Utah Schools for the Deaf and the Blind.

is assigned a period of guided teaching

t assumes increasing responsibility for

group or groups of students over a period

R277-509-2. Authority an Purpose. A. This rule is a orized under Article X, Section 3 of the Utah Constitution which sts general authority and supervision of public education in the ard, Sections 53A-6-104(1) which permit the Board to issue lie ses for educators, Section 53A-6- 401 3 which irects the tah S te Office of Education to tablish

a rocedure for obtainin and ev uatin relevant informatio about license applicants and Section 53A-l-401(3) which allows the Board to adopt rules in accordanc with its responsibilities.
B. The purpose of this le is to specify the procedure under which the Board issues Ii nses to student teachers and interns.

R277-509-3. Issuing**Licenses~** A. The Board shall issu in[--ttll'i\r6'Yed

Commission receive and review back ound information about student teachers and interns (2) Student teachers and interns shall ve student teacher licenses issued by the Board prior to assignment in public schools.

40 DAR File No. 37059**[BJ~.** license is issued only to student teachers or interns assigned to e mentary, middle, or secondary schools under cooperating teachers r part of their preparation program. A supervising administrat must be permanently assigned to the building to which an intern · assigned. [€J!2. A Student cher or Intern license is valid only in**sell~l-ftlsfl'iet-~-ell:flffl~!eft<66i]LEA** specified and for the

R277-509-4. Requirements. A. An**[seit66-1-~tflel;-6f'-eftlllltelo....seli66+** accept or assign student teachers or intern who do not possess a Utah Student Teacher or Intern license. The assigned is not recognized by the Board as student teaching requirement for licensure.
B. It is the responsibility of the [sel't66'.l-tllstfteH:ff-1:'1tftl:lef' selw6l]LEA to verify that potential student teachers appropriately licensed.

KEY: student teachers, interns, teacher preparation p Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment:**~)2013** Notice of Continuation: October 5, 2012 Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: Art X Sec 3; 53A-6-104(1); 53A-1-401(3)

### Environment~! 

## Quality, Air Quality 

## R307-401-15
Air Strippers and Soil Venting Projects

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE (Amendment)
DAR FILE NO.: 37037

FILED: 11/08/2012

RULE ANALYSIS PURPOSE OF THE RULE OR REASON FOR THE CHANGE: On 06/25/2012, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed to conditionally approve a change to Section R307-401-15, Air Strippers and Soil Venting Projects, that was approved by the Board and submitted to EPA for review/approval in 1999. The rule contains language allowing

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, December 01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 23DAR File No. 37037

the Director to approve alternate test and monitoring methods. However, EPA's current policy precludes approving
any rule that contains language that allows a director to exercise their discretion in such cases. Therefore, they have proposed to convert the conditional approval to a disapproval in one year unless Utah revises the rule to remove the discretionary language.

SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The proposed rule change will update the rule to refer to the most recent test methods, and will allow sources to use future updated federally approved methods, if approved by the director. DAQ is also making available for public comment a document titled, Air Quality Impact of Changes Made to Section R307- 401-15 Air Strippers and Soil Venting Projects in 1999 and the new Section R307-401-16 De minimis Emissions from Soil Aeration Projects .that was Adopted in 1999. This document fulfills the requirements of Section 110(1) of the Clean Air Act and justifies the changes made to Section R307-401-16 in 1999. The document will be made available
at http://www.airquality.utah.gov/Public-lnterest/PublicCommen-Hearings/Pubrule.htm for public review and commentfrom 12/01/2012to 12/31/2012.

STATUTORY OR CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORIZATION FOR THIS RULE: Section 19-2-108 and Subsection 19-2-104(3) (q)

ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:


### + THE STATE BUDGET: This rule does not create any new requirements on the state; therefore, there are no anticipated
costs or savings to the state budget.


### + LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: This rule does not create any

new requirements on local government; therefore, there are

no anticipated costs or savings to local government.

+ SMALL BUSINESSES: Because the changes to this rule only update the rule to refer to the most recent test methods and allows sources to use future updated federally approved methods there are no anticipated savings or costs to small businesses.

+ PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Because the changes to this rule only update the rule to refer
to the most recent test methods and allows sources to use future updated federally approved methods there are no anticipated savings or costs to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities.

COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: Because the changes to this rule only update the rule to refer
to the most recent test methods and allows sources to use future updated federally approved methods there are no anticipated compliance costs for affected persons.

COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: Because the changes to this rule only update the rule to refer
to the most recent test methods and allows sources to use

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, December 01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 23 NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

future updated federally approved methods there is no anticipated fiscal impact on businesses.

THE FULL TEXT OF THIS RULE MAY BE INSPECTED, DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS, AT: ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITY FOURTH FLOOR 195 N 1950 W SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-3085

or at the Division of Administrative Rules.

DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: 

### + Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-
5 - , or by Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov

INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO
LATER THANAT 5:00 PM ON 12/31/2012

THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/07/2013

AUTHORIZED BY: Bryce Bird, Director

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality.
R307-401. Permit: New and Modified Sources.
R307-401-15. Air Strippers and Soil Venting Projects. (I) The owner or operator of an air stripper or soil venting system that is used to remediate contaminated groundwater or soil is exempt from the notice of intent and approval order requirements of
R307-401-5 through 8 ifthe following conditions are met: (a) the estimated total air emissions of volatile organic compounds from a given project are less than the de minimis
emissions listed in R307-401-9(l)(a), and (b) the level of any one hazardous air pollutant or any combination of hazardous air pollutants is below the levels listed in R307-410-5(1 )( d). (2) The owner or operator shall submit documentation that
the project meets the exemption requirements in R307-401-15(1) [ttbtwe-]to the director prior to beginning the remediation project. (3) After beginning the soil remediation project, the owner

or operator shall submit emissions information to the director to verify
that the emission rates of the volatile organic compounds and
hazardous air pollutants in R307-401-15 (I) [ ttbtwe-]are not exceeded.

___ _,.(a,...) Emissions estimates of volatile organic compounds [flftd h!!Z!lftffitts aif pelittfllll:ts ]shall be based on test data obtained in
accordance with the test method in the EPA document SW-846, Test #[8We]8260c or 826la or the most recent EPA revision of either test. method if approved by the director. (b) Emissions estimates of hazardous air pollutants shall be
based on test data obtained in accordance with the test method in EPA.
document SW-846 Test #8021.8 or [etlief]the most recent EPA revision of the test[ et' HteHiteriflg] method if.approved by the director.

___ (...,.c,_) Results of the test and calculated annual quantity of
emissions of volatile organic compounds and hazardous air pollutants
shall be submitted to the director within one month of sampling.

41NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

-----'(._,,d.._) The test samples shall be drawn on intervals of no less
than twenty-eight days and no more than thirty-one days (i.e., monthly) for the first quarter, quarterly for the first year, and semiannually thereafter or as determined necessary by the director. ( 4) The following control devices do not require a notice of
intent or approval order when used in relation to an air stripper or soil venting project exempted under R307-401-15: (a) thermodestruction unit with a rated input capacity ofless
than five million BTU per hour using no other auxiliary fuel than
natural gas or LPG, or (b) carbon adsorption unit

KEY: air pollution, permits, approval orders, greenhouse gases Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: [Januaey 1, 2fil1]2013 Notice of Continuation: July 13, 2007 Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(3) (q); 19-2-108



## Health, Disease Control and Prevention, Health Promotion 

## R384-201
chool-Based Vision Screening for Students in Public Schools

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE (New Rule) DAR FILE NO.: 37028

FILED: 11/02/2012

RULE ANALYSIS PURPOSE OF T RULE OR REASON FOR THE CHANGE: The purpo of school-based vision screening is
to set standards and ocedures for vision screening for students in public schools. This is necessary to detect vision difficulties in school age c · dren in public schools so that follow up for potential conce may be done by the child's parent or guardian. Vision sere ning is not a substitute for a complete eye exam and ion evaluation by an ophthalmologist or optometrist.

SUMMARY OF THE RULE This rule establishes guidelines for student vision creening, including screening requirements, documenting p of of screening, training of screeners, screening doc entation, and requirements for referrals.

STATUTORY OR CONSTITUTIONALAUTHORI THIS RULE: Section 53A-11-203

ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:

+ THE STATE BUDGET: The Utah Division of the Bli financially responsible for developing and maintaining a vis n screening database, maintaining staff positions for visio screening training, screening documentation, photo screening

42 DAR File No. 37037

d referral follow-up. Staff time is required to process

s ool vision screening reports and to create and maintain a

re istry of results. The State Department of Health will act as

co ultant in the development of the database, doc entation, training and visual screening requirements in the s hool setting.


### + LO L GOVERNMENTS: The proposed rule does not add
costs t existing local budgets. Existing budgets cover the
costs o vision screening in school which have long been establish

, requiring staff time of school personnel and existing s ool nurses to participate in training, conduct required s eenings, and prepare and submit required reports. 

### + SMALL B INESSES: There are no costs for small businesses. T e proposed rule only impacts local schools and state govern ent entities.


### + PERSONS THER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, 0 LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There are no costs r small businesses. The proposed rule only impacts local sc ols and state government entities.

COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There

are no compliance ts for affected persons. Vision screenings are provided f e of charge to students.

COMMENTS BY THE PARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RUL MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: Vision screening is important success in school. No fiscal impact on business is predicte

THE FULL TEXT OF THIS R DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HEALTH DISEASE. CONTROL AND HEALTH PROMOTION CANNON HEALTH BLDG 288 N 1460W SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-32 1

or at the Division of Administrativ Rules.

DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS ULE TO:

+ Heather Borski by phone at 801-538-9998 by FAX at 801- 538-9495, or by Internet E-mail at hborski@ut h.gov

INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THE THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN CO LATER THANAT 5:00 PM ON 12/31/2012

THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 01/0

AUTHORIZED BY: David Patton, PhD, Executive Dir

R384. Health, Disease Promotion. 84-201. School-Based Vision Screenin for Students ·n Public Schools. R384-201-1. Authority. (1) This rule is authorized by section 53A-ll-203.

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, December 01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 23October 4, 2012



## Air Quality Impact of Changes Made to R307-401-15 Air Strippers and
Soil Venting Projects 

## in 1999 and the new rule R307-401-16 De minimis

Emissions from Soil Aeration Projects 

## that was adopted in 1999

Background

R307

- 401-15 Air Strippers and Soil Venting Projects and R307-401-16 De minimis Emissions from Soil

Aeration Projects are permits by rule for projects with emissions of less than 5 tons/yr 

# voe and less than

the emission thresholds established for HAPs in the modeling rule, R307-410. In most cases benzene is

the controlling pollutant rather than 

# voe. Many air stripper and soil venting projects have to install

controls (carbon adsorption unit or thermodestruction unit as allowed by the rule) to stay under these

thresholds. Sources that are below the required threshold are not required to receive an approval
order, but are required to submit documentation that they qualify under the rule before beginning the

remediation project. Sources are required to submit reports to demonstrate that their actual emissions

are below the threshold for the rule and if they exceed the threshold they are required to submit a
notice of intent and receive an approval order

.



## 1999 Rule Change

EPA last approved R307-401-15 in 1998 and there have been several changes to the rule in the intervening years. The most significant change occurred in 1999 when the applicability threshold was
raised from 1.5 tons/yr 

# voe to 5 tons/yr 

# voe to be consistent with the small source exemption in R307-

401-9

. R307-401-16 was adopted at the same time in 1999 with a similar applicability threshold. These

two rules do not adversely affect the NAAQS.

R307

- 401-15 was originally adopted when the leaking underground storage tank (LUST) program began

about twenty years ago. At that time UDAQ was receiving a large number of NOls for LUST projects and

determined that it was better to address smaller projects through a standardized rule rather than caseby-case review

. The number of small projects was very high at the beginning of the program, but has dropped significantly in recent years. There are currently about 5 projects per year that qualify under

the Air Strippers and Soil Venting Projects rule or the Soil Aeration rule

. These projects are scattered throughout the state and have minimal impact on the NAAQs

. Both rules require notification of the project to UDAQ and documentation of emissions from the project. In most cases 

# voe emissions are
less than 2 tons/year. UDAQ provided EPA with a copy of the reports that have been submitted under

this rule for the last 4 years to demonstrate that 

# voe emissions are low and that there is minimal impact

on the NAAQS from these projects

. Table 1 summarizes the location of these projects in the last 4 years.October 4, 2012

Table 

### 1.

Region County Number of Projects in Last 4 years Wasatch Front Salt Lake 3
Utah 1
Weber 1 Southwestern Utah Washington 2 Uintah Basin Duchesne 2
Rest of Utah Emery 2
Sevier 1
Tooele 3
Summit 1
Cache 1
Box Elder 1
Carbon 1 County not shown on 2 documentation



## Conclusion

The changes made to R307-401-15 in 1999 and the adoption of R307-401-16 in 1999 do not interfere

with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress as required by

section 110(1) of the Clean Air Act.

# Hearing/CommentsNOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

HIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 01/07/2013

Carol Lear, Director, School Law and

ducation, Administration.
9. Licensure of Student Teachers and Interns.

-1. Definitions.
"Board" means the Utah State Board of Education.

"Cooperating teacher" means a licensed teacher


### an [seh:MI distriet tlf eltttrter setttJtJl]LEA who is qualified to irectly supervise a student teacher or intern during the period the stll ent teacher or intern is assigned to the [distriet]LEA. C. ' tern" means a teacher education student, who, in an advanced stag of preparation, usually as a culminating experience,

may be employ d in a school setting for a period of up to one year and receive sal proportionate to the service rendered. 

### An intern is supervised p · arily by the school system but with a continuing relationship with college personnel and following a planned

program designe to produce a demonstrably competent professional.
D. "LEA' mean a local educati n a enc incl d·n local school s/ bli hool di tricts ch er schools an for

e Utah Schools for the Deaf and the Blind.

is assigned a period of guided teaching

t assumes increasing responsibility for

group or groups of students over a period

R277-509-2. Authority an Purpose. A. This rule is a orized under Article X, Section 3 of the Utah Constitution which sts general authority and supervision of public education in the ard, Sections 53A-6-104(1) which permit the Board to issue lie ses for educators, Section 53A-6- 401 3 which irects the tah S te Office of Education to tablish

a rocedure for obtainin and ev uatin relevant informatio about license applicants and Section 53A-l-401(3) which allows the Board to adopt rules in accordanc with its responsibilities.
B. The purpose of this le is to specify the procedure under which the Board issues Ii nses to student teachers and interns.

R277-509-3. Issuing**Licenses~** A. The Board shall issu in[--ttll'i\r6'Yed

Commission receive and review back ound information about student teachers and interns (2) Student teachers and interns shall ve student teacher licenses issued by the Board prior to assignment in public schools.

40 DAR File No. 37059**[BJ~.** license is issued only to student teachers or interns assigned to e mentary, middle, or secondary schools under cooperating teachers r part of their preparation program. A supervising administrat must be permanently assigned to the building to which an intern · assigned. [€J!2. A Student cher or Intern license is valid only in**sell~l-ftlsfl'iet-~-ell:flffl~!eft<66i]LEA** specified and for the

R277-509-4. Requirements. A. An**[seit66-1-~tflel;-6f'-eftlllltelo....seli66+** accept or assign student teachers or intern who do not possess a Utah Student Teacher or Intern license. The assigned is not recognized by the Board as student teaching requirement for licensure.
B. It is the responsibility of the [sel't66'.l-tllstfteH:ff-1:'1tftl:lef' selw6l]LEA to verify that potential student teachers appropriately licensed.

KEY: student teachers, interns, teacher preparation p Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment:**~)2013** Notice of Continuation: October 5, 2012 Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: Art X Sec 3; 53A-6-104(1); 53A-1-401(3)

### Environment~! 

## Quality, Air Quality 

## R307-401-15
Air Strippers and Soil Venting Projects

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE (Amendment)
DAR FILE NO.: 37037

FILED: 11/08/2012

RULE ANALYSIS PURPOSE OF THE RULE OR REASON FOR THE CHANGE: On 06/25/2012, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed to conditionally approve a change to Section R307-401-15, Air Strippers and Soil Venting Projects, that was approved by the Board and submitted to EPA for review/approval in 1999. The rule contains language allowing

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, December 01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 23DAR File No. 37037

the Director to approve alternate test and monitoring methods. However, EPA's current policy precludes approving
any rule that contains language that allows a director to exercise their discretion in such cases. Therefore, they have proposed to convert the conditional approval to a disapproval in one year unless Utah revises the rule to remove the discretionary language.

SUMMARY OF THE RULE OR CHANGE: The proposed rule change will update the rule to refer to the most recent test methods, and will allow sources to use future updated federally approved methods, if approved by the director. DAQ is also making available for public comment a document titled, Air Quality Impact of Changes Made to Section R307- 401-15 Air Strippers and Soil Venting Projects in 1999 and the new Section R307-401-16 De minimis Emissions from Soil Aeration Projects .that was Adopted in 1999. This document fulfills the requirements of Section 110(1) of the Clean Air Act and justifies the changes made to Section R307-401-16 in 1999. The document will be made available
at http://www.airquality.utah.gov/Public-lnterest/PublicCommen-Hearings/Pubrule.htm for public review and commentfrom 12/01/2012to 12/31/2012.

STATUTORY OR CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORIZATION FOR THIS RULE: Section 19-2-108 and Subsection 19-2-104(3) (q)

ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:


### + THE STATE BUDGET: This rule does not create any new requirements on the state; therefore, there are no anticipated
costs or savings to the state budget.


### + LOCAL GOVERNMENTS: This rule does not create any

new requirements on local government; therefore, there are

no anticipated costs or savings to local government.

+ SMALL BUSINESSES: Because the changes to this rule only update the rule to refer to the most recent test methods and allows sources to use future updated federally approved methods there are no anticipated savings or costs to small businesses.

+ PERSONS OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: Because the changes to this rule only update the rule to refer
to the most recent test methods and allows sources to use future updated federally approved methods there are no anticipated savings or costs to persons other than small businesses, businesses, or local government entities.

COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: Because the changes to this rule only update the rule to refer
to the most recent test methods and allows sources to use future updated federally approved methods there are no anticipated compliance costs for affected persons.

COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RULE MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: Because the changes to this rule only update the rule to refer
to the most recent test methods and allows sources to use

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, December 01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 23 NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

future updated federally approved methods there is no anticipated fiscal impact on businesses.

THE FULL TEXT OF THIS RULE MAY BE INSPECTED, DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HOURS, AT: ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AIR QUALITY FOURTH FLOOR 195 N 1950 W SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-3085

or at the Division of Administrative Rules.

DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS RULE TO: 

### + Mark Berger by phone at 801-536-4000, by FAX at 801-
5 - , or by Internet E-mail at mberger@utah.gov

INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THEIR VIEWS ON THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN COMMENTS NO
LATER THANAT 5:00 PM ON 12/31/2012

THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 02/07/2013

AUTHORIZED BY: Bryce Bird, Director

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality.
R307-401. Permit: New and Modified Sources.
R307-401-15. Air Strippers and Soil Venting Projects. (I) The owner or operator of an air stripper or soil venting system that is used to remediate contaminated groundwater or soil is exempt from the notice of intent and approval order requirements of
R307-401-5 through 8 ifthe following conditions are met: (a) the estimated total air emissions of volatile organic compounds from a given project are less than the de minimis
emissions listed in R307-401-9(l)(a), and (b) the level of any one hazardous air pollutant or any combination of hazardous air pollutants is below the levels listed in R307-410-5(1 )( d). (2) The owner or operator shall submit documentation that
the project meets the exemption requirements in R307-401-15(1) [ttbtwe-]to the director prior to beginning the remediation project. (3) After beginning the soil remediation project, the owner

or operator shall submit emissions information to the director to verify
that the emission rates of the volatile organic compounds and
hazardous air pollutants in R307-401-15 (I) [ ttbtwe-]are not exceeded.

___ _,.(a,...) Emissions estimates of volatile organic compounds [flftd h!!Z!lftffitts aif pelittfllll:ts ]shall be based on test data obtained in
accordance with the test method in the EPA document SW-846, Test #[8We]8260c or 826la or the most recent EPA revision of either test. method if approved by the director. (b) Emissions estimates of hazardous air pollutants shall be
based on test data obtained in accordance with the test method in EPA.
document SW-846 Test #8021.8 or [etlief]the most recent EPA revision of the test[ et' HteHiteriflg] method if.approved by the director.

___ (...,.c,_) Results of the test and calculated annual quantity of
emissions of volatile organic compounds and hazardous air pollutants
shall be submitted to the director within one month of sampling.

41NOTICES OF PROPOSED RULES

-----'(._,,d.._) The test samples shall be drawn on intervals of no less
than twenty-eight days and no more than thirty-one days (i.e., monthly) for the first quarter, quarterly for the first year, and semiannually thereafter or as determined necessary by the director. ( 4) The following control devices do not require a notice of
intent or approval order when used in relation to an air stripper or soil venting project exempted under R307-401-15: (a) thermodestruction unit with a rated input capacity ofless
than five million BTU per hour using no other auxiliary fuel than
natural gas or LPG, or (b) carbon adsorption unit

KEY: air pollution, permits, approval orders, greenhouse gases Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: [Januaey 1, 2fil1]2013 Notice of Continuation: July 13, 2007 Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(3) (q); 19-2-108



## Health, Disease Control and Prevention, Health Promotion 

## R384-201
chool-Based Vision Screening for Students in Public Schools

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE (New Rule) DAR FILE NO.: 37028

FILED: 11/02/2012

RULE ANALYSIS PURPOSE OF T RULE OR REASON FOR THE CHANGE: The purpo of school-based vision screening is
to set standards and ocedures for vision screening for students in public schools. This is necessary to detect vision difficulties in school age c · dren in public schools so that follow up for potential conce may be done by the child's parent or guardian. Vision sere ning is not a substitute for a complete eye exam and ion evaluation by an ophthalmologist or optometrist.

SUMMARY OF THE RULE This rule establishes guidelines for student vision creening, including screening requirements, documenting p of of screening, training of screeners, screening doc entation, and requirements for referrals.

STATUTORY OR CONSTITUTIONALAUTHORI THIS RULE: Section 53A-11-203

ANTICIPATED COST OR SAVINGS TO:

+ THE STATE BUDGET: The Utah Division of the Bli financially responsible for developing and maintaining a vis n screening database, maintaining staff positions for visio screening training, screening documentation, photo screening

42 DAR File No. 37037

d referral follow-up. Staff time is required to process

s ool vision screening reports and to create and maintain a

re istry of results. The State Department of Health will act as

co ultant in the development of the database, doc entation, training and visual screening requirements in the s hool setting.


### + LO L GOVERNMENTS: The proposed rule does not add
costs t existing local budgets. Existing budgets cover the
costs o vision screening in school which have long been establish

, requiring staff time of school personnel and existing s ool nurses to participate in training, conduct required s eenings, and prepare and submit required reports. 

### + SMALL B INESSES: There are no costs for small businesses. T e proposed rule only impacts local schools and state govern ent entities.


### + PERSONS THER THAN SMALL BUSINESSES, BUSINESSES, 0 LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: There are no costs r small businesses. The proposed rule only impacts local sc ols and state government entities.

COMPLIANCE COSTS FOR AFFECTED PERSONS: There

are no compliance ts for affected persons. Vision screenings are provided f e of charge to students.

COMMENTS BY THE PARTMENT HEAD ON THE FISCAL IMPACT THE RUL MAY HAVE ON BUSINESSES: Vision screening is important success in school. No fiscal impact on business is predicte

THE FULL TEXT OF THIS R DURING REGULAR BUSINESS HEALTH DISEASE. CONTROL AND HEALTH PROMOTION CANNON HEALTH BLDG 288 N 1460W SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84116-32 1

or at the Division of Administrativ Rules.

DIRECT QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS ULE TO:

+ Heather Borski by phone at 801-538-9998 by FAX at 801- 538-9495, or by Internet E-mail at hborski@ut h.gov

INTERESTED PERSONS MAY PRESENT THE THIS RULE BY SUBMITTING WRITTEN CO LATER THANAT 5:00 PM ON 12/31/2012

THIS RULE MAY BECOME EFFECTIVE ON: 01/0

AUTHORIZED BY: David Patton, PhD, Executive Dir

R384. Health, Disease Promotion. 84-201. School-Based Vision Screenin for Students ·n Public Schools. R384-201-1. Authority. (1) This rule is authorized by section 53A-ll-203.

UTAH STATE BULLETIN, December 01, 2012, Vol. 2012, No. 23195 North 1950 West • Salt Lake City, Utah Mailing Address: P.O. Box 144820 • Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-48 20 Telephone (801) 536-4000 • Fax (801) 536-4099 • T.D.D. (801) 536-4414 www.deq.utah.gov Printed on 100% recycled paper 

## State of Utah

GARY R. HERBERT Governor

GREG BELL Lieutenant Governor 

## Department of Environmental Quality

Amanda Smith
Executive Director

DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY Bryce C. Bird

Director



### DAQ-011-13

M E M O R A N D U M

TO: Air Quality Board

THROUGH: Bryce C. Bird, Executive Secretary

FROM: Colleen Delaney, Environmental Scientist

DATE: January 16, 2013

SUBJECT: FINAL ADOPTION: R307-401-15. Permit: New and Modified Sources. Air Strippers and Soil Venting Projects.

______________________________________________________________________________________
On November 7, 2012, the Air Quality Board propo sed revisions to R307-401-15, Air Strippers and Soil Venting Projects. The rule was updated to refer to the most recent test methods and to allow sources to use future updated federally-approved me thods, if approved by the Director. No comments were received on this proposal.

Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board adopt the proposed revisions to R307-401-15.

# Nonsubstantive

Change

### R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality. R307-401. Permit: New and Modified Sources. R307-401-15. Air Strippers and Soil Venting Projects. 

### (1) The owner or operator of an air stripper or soil venting system that is used to remediate contaminated groundwater or soil is exempt from the notice of intent and approval order requirements of R307-401-5 through 8 if the following conditions

are met: (a) 

### compounds emissions the estimated total air emissions of volatile organic from a given project are less than the de minimis listed in R307-401-9(1) (a), and (b) the level of any one hazardous air pollutant or any combination of hazardous air pollutants is below the levels listed in R307-410

- 5(1) 

### [+e+J (c) (i) (C). ( 2) The owner or operator shall submit documentation that the project meets the exemption requirements in (1) above to the director prior to beginning the remediation project. (3) After beginning the soil remediation project, the owner

or operator shall submit emissions information to the director to verify that the emission rates of the volatile organic compounds and hazardous air pollutants in (1) above are not exceeded. Emissions estimates of

. volatile organic compounds and hazardous air pollutants shall be based on test data obtained in accordance with the test method in the EPA document SW-846, Test #8020 or #8021 or other test or monitoring method approved by the director. Results of the test and calculated annual quantity of emissions of volatile organic compounds and hazardous air pollutants shall be submitted to the director within one month of sampling. The test samples shall be drawn on intervals of no less than twenty-eight days · and no more than thirty-one days (i.e.

, monthly) for the first quarter, quarterly for the first year, and semi-annually thereafter or as determined necessary by the director. (4) The following control devices do not require a notice of intent or approval order when used in relation to an air stripper

or soil venting project exempted under R307-401-15: (a) thermodestruction unit with a rated input capacity of less than five million BTU per hour using no other auxiliary fuel than natural gas or LPG, or (b) carbon adsorption unit.

KEY: air pollution, permits, approval orders, greenhouse gases Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: January 1, 2011 Notice of Continuation: June 6, 2012 Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2-104(3)(q); 19-2-108

# E ffective Rule' 

# .

R307-401-15
DAR Nos. 37037 (AMD) and 37236 (NSC) Effective: Feb. 7, 2013 (AMD) and Feb. 15, 2013 (NSC)' 

# .

R307. Environmental Quality, Air Quality.
R307-401. Permit: New and Modified Sources.
R307-401-15. Air Strippers and Soil Venting Projects. (I) The owner or operator of an air stripper or soil venting system that is used to remediate contaminated groundwater or soil is exempt from the notice of intent and approval order requirements of R307-401-5 through 8 if the following conditions are met: (a) the estimated total air emissions of volatile organic compounds from a given project are less than the de
minimis emissions listed in R307-401-9(1)(a), and (b) the level of any one hazardous air pollutant or
any combination of hazardous air pollutants is below the levels
listed in R307-410-5(1)(c)(i)(C). (2) The owner or operator shall submit
documentation that the project meets the exemption requirements in R307-401-15(1) to the director prior to beginning the remediation project. (3) After beginning the soil remediation project, the

owner or operator shall submit emissions information to the
director to verify that the emission rates of the volatile organic compounds and hazardous air pollutants in R307-401-15(1) are
not exceeded. (a) Emissions estimates of volatile organic compounds shall be based on test data obtained in accordance
with the test method in the EPA document SW-846, Test
#8260c or 8261 a, or the most recent EPA revision of either test method if approved by the director. (b) Emissions estimates of hazardous air pollutants
shall be based on test data obtained in accordance with the test method in EPA document SW-846, Test #8021B or the most

recent EPA revision of the test method if approved by the director. ( c) Results of the test and calculated annual quantity
of emissions of volatile organic compounds and hazardous air pollutants shall be submitted to the director within one month of sampling. ( d) The test samples shall be drawn on intervals of

no less than twenty-eight days and no more than thirty-one days (i.e., monthly) for the first quarter, quarterly for the first year, and semi-annually thereafter or as determined necessary by the director. (4) The following control devices do not require a notice of intent or approval order when used in relation to an air stripper or soil venting project exempted under R307-401- 15: (a) thermodestruction unit with a rated input capacity of less than five million BTU per hour using no other auxiliary fuel than natural gas or LPG, or (b) carbon adsorption unit.

KEY: air pollution, permits, approval orders, greenhouse

gases Date of Enactment or Last Substantive Amendment: February 7, 2013
Notice of Continuation: June 6, 2012 Authorizing, and Implemented or Interpreted Law: 19-2- 104(3)(q); 19-2-108 !--dar--Utah State Bulletin, March 1, 2013, Vol. 2013, No. 5

- b20130301.pdf http://www

. rules.utah.gov/publicat/bull_pdf/2013/b20130301.pdf

225 of227 

### N011CES OF 

## RULE EFFECTIVE DATES

State law provides for agencies to make their rules effective and enforceable after publication in the Utah State Bulletin. In the case of Proposed Rules or Changes in Proposed Rules with a designated comment period, the law permits an agency 

### to file a notice of effective date any time after the close of comment plus seven days. In the case of Changes in Proposed Rules with no designated comment period, the law permits an agency to file a notice of effective date on any date including or after the thirtieth day after the rule's publication date

. If an agency fails to file

a Notice of Effective Date within 120 days from the publication of a Proposed Rule or a related Change in Proposed Rule the rule lapses and the agency must start the rulemaking process over.

Notices of Effective Date are governed by Subsection 63G-3-301 (12), 63G-3-303, and Sections R15-4-Sa and Sb

.

Abbreviations AMO =Amendment CPR = Change in Proposed Rule NEW = New Rule R&R = Repeal & Reenact REP= Repeal

Environmental Quality Air Quality
No

. 37037 (AMO): R307-401-15.Air Strippers and Soil Venting Projects Published : 12/01/2012 Effective: 02/07/2013

Health Disease Control and Prevention

, Health Promotion No. 37028 (NEW) : R384-201

. School-Based Vision Screening for Students in Public Schools Published: 12/01/2012 Effective: 02/20/2013 Human Services Services for People with Disabilities No

. 37110 (AMO) : R539-1.Eligibility Published: 01/01/2013 Effective : 02/1312013

No. 37111 (AMO) : R539-2

. Service Coordination Published: 01/01/2013 Effective : 02/13/2013

Natural Resources Wildlife Resources No. 37097 (AMO): R657-37

. Cooperative Wildlife Management Units for Big Game or Turkey Published: 01/01/2013 Effective : 02/07/2013

Transportation Administration No

. 37094 (R&R): R907-64

. Longitudinal and Wireless Access to Interstate Highway Rights-of-Way for Installation of Telecommunications Facilities Published : 01/01/2013 Effective : 02107/2013

End of the Notices of Rule Effective Oates Section

UTAH STATE BULLETIN

, March 01, 2013

, Vol. 2013, No

. 5 219

3/5/2013 4:26 PMOctober 4, 2012



## Air Quality Impact of Changes Made to R307-401-15 Air Strippers and
Soil Venting Projects 

## in 1999 and the new rule R307-401-16 De minimis

Emissions from Soil Aeration Projects 

## that was adopted in 1999

Background

R307

- 401-15 Air Strippers and Soil Venting Projects and R307-401-16 De minimis Emissions from Soil

Aeration Projects are permits by rule for projects with emissions of less than 5 tons/yr 

# voe and less than

the emission thresholds established for HAPs in the modeling rule, R307-410. In most cases benzene is

the controlling pollutant rather than 

# voe. Many air stripper and soil venting projects have to install

controls (carbon adsorption unit or thermodestruction unit as allowed by the rule) to stay under these

thresholds. Sources that are below the required threshold are not required to receive an approval
order, but are required to submit documentation that they qualify under the rule before beginning the

remediation project. Sources are required to submit reports to demonstrate that their actual emissions

are below the threshold for the rule and if they exceed the threshold they are required to submit a
notice of intent and receive an approval order

.



## 1999 Rule Change

EPA last approved R307-401-15 in 1998 and there have been several changes to the rule in the intervening years. The most significant change occurred in 1999 when the applicability threshold was
raised from 1.5 tons/yr 

# voe to 5 tons/yr 

# voe to be consistent with the small source exemption in R307-

401-9

. R307-401-16 was adopted at the same time in 1999 with a similar applicability threshold. These

two rules do not adversely affect the NAAQS.

R307

- 401-15 was originally adopted when the leaking underground storage tank (LUST) program began

about twenty years ago. At that time UDAQ was receiving a large number of NOls for LUST projects and

determined that it was better to address smaller projects through a standardized rule rather than caseby-case review

. The number of small projects was very high at the beginning of the program, but has dropped significantly in recent years. There are currently about 5 projects per year that qualify under

the Air Strippers and Soil Venting Projects rule or the Soil Aeration rule

. These projects are scattered throughout the state and have minimal impact on the NAAQs

. Both rules require notification of the project to UDAQ and documentation of emissions from the project. In most cases 

# voe emissions are
less than 2 tons/year. UDAQ provided EPA with a copy of the reports that have been submitted under

this rule for the last 4 years to demonstrate that 

# voe emissions are low and that there is minimal impact

on the NAAQS from these projects

. Table 1 summarizes the location of these projects in the last 4 years.October 4, 2012

Table 

### 1.

Region County Number of Projects in Last 4 years Wasatch Front Salt Lake 3
Utah 1
Weber 1 Southwestern Utah Washington 2 Uintah Basin Duchesne 2
Rest of Utah Emery 2
Sevier 1
Tooele 3
Summit 1
Cache 1
Box Elder 1
Carbon 1 County not shown on 2 documentation



## Conclusion

The changes made to R307-401-15 in 1999 and the adoption of R307-401-16 in 1999 do not interfere

with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress as required by

section 110(1) of the Clean Air Act.

# Certification

### I, Mark W. Berger, Rules Coordinator for the Utah Division of Air Quality, do hereby certify
that the public comment period held to receive comments regarding R307-401-15 (DAR #37037)
and the Air Quality Impact Analysis 110(1) demonstration, 

### Air Quality Impact of Changes Made

to R307-401-15 Air Strippers and Soil Venting Projects in 1999 and the new rule R307-401-16
Deminimis Emissions from Soil Aeeration Projects that was adopted in**199~** 

### was held in
accordance with the information provided in the published public notices and as defined in Utah
Code 19-2-109. I also certify that R307-401-15 was adopted by the Utah Air Quality Board.

Signed this 

## _lS_ day of July 2013.