Glen - Gery Corporation Technical Servic es / Research 433 South Pottsville Pike Shoemakersville, PA 19555 (610) 562
- 3076 Fax: (610) 562
- 2084 http://www.glengerybrick.com



## October 0 5, 2012

CERTIFIED MAIL NO.: 7008 1140 0004 6638 3858 Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Air Quality Division of Source Testing and Monitoring 400 Market Street 12th 

## Floor Rachael Carson State Office Building Harrisburg, PA 17105

- 8468 RE: Stack Testing Results for the Glen

- Gery Corporation, York PA Plant Title V Permit No: 67

- 05045 York County, Spring Garden Township To Whom It May Concern , Per Section D.I condition #004 and Section D. II condition #009 of the Title V Operating Permit No: 67

- 05045, the Glen

- Gery Corporations York Plant is required to c onduct performance testing for particulates, hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen chloride, and opacity from its No. 2 Tunnel Kiln (source ID: 102) ev ery five years

. The most recent required stack testing was conducted on August 30, 2012

. Enclosed please find three (3) copies of the emission test report prepared by Air Compliance Testing, Inc. Testing was conducted while operating source 102 at maximum production level for the Red Matt and 213 products . The Glen

- Gery Corporation has reviewed the enclosed report and agrees with the following findings.
Pollutant Emission

Rate/Concentration Permit Limit Compliance Status Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) 0.01 lb. /ton product 0.26 lb. /ton product Compliant Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) 0. 035 lb. /ton product 0. 057 lb. /ton product Compliant Filterable Particulate Matter (PM) 0.23 lb./ton product 0.42 lb./ton product Compliant Opacity 0% 0% Compliant

## Please contact me at (610) 562

- 3076 if you have any questions or comments concerning

this test report. Sincerely, Glen

- Gery Corporation Mike Krzyzanowski Technical Services Manager Enclosure

cc: Mike Lighty John Vrobel

# Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Determination of Hydrochloric Acid and Hydrofluoric Acid Reduction Efficiency and Filterable Particulate Matter and Visible

Emissions Natural Gas-Fired Tunnel Kiln No. 2

(Source ID: 102) EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9 and 26A Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

York, Pennsylvania Date Conducted: August 30, 2012 Job Number: 120805

Prepared by:

PO Box 41156 Cleveland OH 44141-0156 Phone: (800) EPA-AIR1 (372-2471) 

### Report Date: September 27, 2012

## Superior Quality

Emission Testing. Valid Results Guaranteed. P.O. Box 41156 Cleveland, Ohio 44141 1-800-EPA-AIR1 www.aircomp.com

testing@aircomp.com 

## September 27, 2012 Mike Krzyzanowski Director of Research/Development Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant 433 South Pottsville Pike Shoemakersville, Pennsylvania 19555 Dear Mike: The following report provides the results of the compliance emission testing conducted on August 30, 2012. These results are a product of the application of the U.S. EPA Stationary Source Sampling Methods listed in 40 CFR Part 60 Appendix A that were in effect at the time of this test. Please mail one copy of this report along with any other supportive process operating data collected during this test to your local EPA representative. You should also attach a cover letter (on company letterhead) stating the purpose and the outcome of this test. Additionally, you may address, preferably in a timetable format, any obligations or implications that might be necessary to achieve environmental compliance because of the result of this test. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or concerns about these test results. On behalf of Air Compliance Testing, I would also like to personally thank you for the opportunity to work with you on this testing project and would enjoy the opportunity to work with you again on any additional future testing projects. Sincerely,

Robert J. Lisy, Jr. Technical ManagerCompliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant



### Source Name: Kiln No. 2 Source ID Number: 102 Control Device: DLA Sampling Location: Inlet Duct Exhaust Stack Product Throughput Rate (ton/hr)* 

### 12.81 Hydrogen Chloride Mass Emission Rate (lb/hr) 

### 0.27 0.15 Hydrogen Fluoride Mass Emission Rate (lb/hr) 

### 4.1 0.4 Hydrogen Chloride Mass Emission Rate (lb/ton-product) 

### - 0.01

Permit Limit - Hydrogen Chloride (lb/ton-product)



### - 0.26 Acceptable Per Permitted Emissions Criteria (Yes/No)



### - Yes Hydrogen Fluoride Mass Emission Rate (lb/ton-product) 

### - 0.035

Permit Limit - Hydrogen Fluoride (lb/ton-product)



### - 0.057 Acceptable Per Permitted Emissions Criteria (Yes/No)



### - Yes Filterable Particulate Matter Mass Emission Rate (lb/ton-product) 

### - 0.23

Permit Limit - Filterable Particulate Matter (lb/ton-product)



### - 0.42 Acceptable Per Permitted Emissions Criteria (Yes/No)



### - Yes Maximum Six-Minute Average of Visible Emissions (%-opacity) 

### - 0

Permit Limit - Visible Emissions (%-opacity)



### - 0 Acceptable Per Permitted Emissions Criteria (Yes/No)



### - Yes PA DEP Title V Permit No. 

### 67-05045 67-05045 * Production data was supplied by Glen-Gery Corporation personnel. 

## Test Results Summary

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant 

# Table of Contents Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 Summary of Test Program 2 1.2 Key Personnel 2 2.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS 3 - 4 2.1 Objectives and Test Matrix 3 2.2 Field Test Changes and Problems 3 2.3 Presentation of Results 4 3.0 PLANT AND SAMPLING LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS 7 - 8 3.1 Process Description and Operation 7 3.2 Control Equipment Description 7 3.3 Flue Gas Sampling Locations 7 - 8 3.4 Process Sampling Location 8 4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 12 - 13 4.1 Test Methods 12 - 13 4.2 Procedures for Obtaining Process Data 13 5.0 INTERNAL QA/QC ACTIVITIES 15 5.1 QA Audits 15 5.2 QA/QC Problems 15 6.0 APPENDIX 19 Production and Process Data Laboratory Results Field Data Sheets Calibrations and Certifications

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 1 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant



## 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Summary of Test Program Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant, located in York, Pennsylvania, contracted Air Compliance Testing, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio, to conduct compliance stack emission testing for their Natural Gas-Fired Tunnel Kiln No.2 (Source ID: 102). Testing was performed to satisfy the emissions testing requirements pursuant to GlenGery's Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PA DEP) Operating Permit No. 67-05045 and the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing, 40 CFR Part 63 - Subpart JJJJJ. The testing was performed on August 30, 2012. Simultaneous sampling was performed at the Kiln No. 2 Dry Limestone Adsorber (DLA) Inlet Duct and at the Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack to determine the hydrochloric acid (HCl) and hydrofluoric acid (HF) reduction efficiency (RE) of the DLA associated with Kiln No. 2. Sampling was also performed at the Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack to determine the emissions of filterable particulate matter (PM). Testing was conducted while Kiln No. 2 operated at Maximum Production Level. During this test, emissions from Kiln No. 2 were controlled by a DLA. In addition to the sampling noted above, opacity readings were taken at the Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack to determine Visible Emissions (VEs) (as percent opacity). Readings were taken while the kiln operated at Maximum Production Level. The test methods that were conducted during this test were EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, and 26A. 1.2 Key Personnel The key personnel who coordinated this test program (and their phone numbers) were: Mike Krzyzanowski, Environmental Manager, Glen-Gery Corporation, 610-562-3076 Rajdeep Bhangu, Air Quality Program, Pennsylvania Dept of Environmental Protection, 717-772-2304 William Borst, Air Quality Program, Pennsylvania Dept of Environmental Protection, 717-390-2360 Tyson Houchin QSTI, Operations Director, Air Compliance Testing, Inc., 800-372-2471 Brian Isom QI, Project Manager, Air Compliance Testing, Inc., 800-372-2471 Sin Hoi Chiew QI, Reporting Engineer, Air Compliance Testing, Inc., 800-372-2471

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 2 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant



## 2.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS 2.1 Objectives and Test Matrix The purpose of this test was to determine the HCl and HF REs associated with the DLA of Kiln No. 2 during operations at Maximum Production Levels. The purpose of this test was also to determine the emissions of filterable PM and the percent opacity of VEs at the Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack while the kiln operated at Maximum Production Level. Testing was performed to satisfy the emissions testing requirements pursuant to Glen-Gery's PA DEP Operating Permit No. 67-05045 and 40 CFR Part 63 - Subpart JJJJJ. The specific test objectives for this test were to: Simultaneously measure the concentrations of HCl and HF at the Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct and the concentrations of HCl, HF, and filterable PM at the Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack. Simultaneously measure the dry standard and actual volumetric flow rate of the stack gas at the Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct and Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack. Utilize the above variables to determine the HCl and HF REs of the DLA associated with Kiln No. 2 and the emissions of filterable PM at the Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack while Kiln No. 2 operated at Maximum Production Level. Determine the VEs (as %-opacity) at the Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack while Kiln No. 2 operated at Maximum Production Level. Table 2.1 presents the sampling and analytical matrix log for this test. 2.2 Field Test Changes and Problems No field test changes or problems occurred during the performance of this test that would bias the accuracy of the results of this test.

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 3 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant



## 2.3 Presentation of Results Single sampling trains were utilized during each run at the Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct and at the Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack to determine the HCl and HF REs of the DLA associated with Kiln No. 2 and at the Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack to determine the emissions of filterable PM. These sampling trains measured the stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, and concentrations of HCl and HF. In addition, the sampling train at the exhaust was used to measure the stack gas concentration of filterable PM. Table 2.2 displays the HCl and HF REs of the DLA associated with Kiln No. 2 and the emissions of filterable PM measured at the Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack. Table 2.2 also displays the maximum 6-minute average of opacity measured at the Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack.

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 4 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant



### EPA TEST METHODS UTILIZED

Date Run

No. Sampling Location 8:13 - 9:30 8:13 - 9:30 8:13 - 9:30 8:13 - 9:30

9:53 - 11:14 9:53 - 11:14 9:53 - 11:14 9:53 - 11:14

11:39 - 12:56 11:39 - 12:56 11:39 - 12:56 11:39 - 12:56

8:13 - 9:30 8:13 - 9:30 8:13 - 9:30 8:13 - 9:30 8:13 - 9:13 8:13 - 9:30

9:53 - 11:14 9:53 - 11:14 9:53 - 11:14 9:53 - 11:14 9:53 - 10:54 9:53 - 11:14

11:39 - 12:56 11:39 - 12:56 11:39 - 12:56 11:39 - 12:56 11:59 - 12:59 11:39 - 12:56
All times are Eastern Daylight Time. 

## Table 2.1 - Sampling and Analytical Matrix 72 72 72

72 60 72 72 60

60 3 8/29/2012 1 Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct

8/29/2012 2 Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct

8/29/2012 3 Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct

8/29/2012 1

2 8/29/2012 M3 M4

72 8/29/2012 M1/M2 (Flow) Sampling Time /

Duration (min)

Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack

Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack

Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack M5 (Filterable PM) (%H2

### O)

72 Sampling Time / Duration (min) M26A (HCl and HF) Sampling Time / Duration (min) M9 Sampling Time / Duration (min)

72 72 72 - 72

72 72 -

72 72 Sampling Time / Duration (min) (VEs) Sampling Time / Duration (min)

- (Dry Mol. Wt.)

- 72 72 72

72 72 -

72 72 72

72 72

72 -

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 5 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Product Throughput Rate (ton/hr)*

- - - - 12.81 12.81 12.81 12.81 HCl Reduction Efficiency (%) - - - - 36.16 47.84 42.47 42.16 HF Reduction Efficiency (%) - - - - 88.74 89.70 89.29 89.24 Hydrogen Chloride Mass Emission Rate (lb/ton-product)

- - - - 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.012 Hydrogen Chloride Mass Emission Rate (lb/hr) 0.24 0.29 0.27 0.27 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 Hydrogen Chloride Concentration (ppmvd) 3.15 4.00 3.62 3.59 2.15 2.11 2.18 2.15 Hydrogen Fluoride Mass Emission Rate (lb/ton-product)

- - - - 0.035 0.035 0.033 0.035 Hydrogen Fluoride Mass Emission Rate (lb/hr) 3.99 4.37 4.00 4.12 0.45 0.45 0.43 0.44 Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration (ppmvd) 94.8 109.4 98.4 100.9 11.4 11.4 11.0 11.3 Filterable Particulate Matter Mass Emission Rate (lb/ton-product)

- - - - 0.202 0.246 0.235 0.228 Filterable Particulate Matter Mass Emission Rate (lb/hr)

- - - - 2.59 3.15 3.01 2.92 Filterable Particulate Matter Concentration (grains/dscf)

- - - - 0.024 0.029 0.028 0.027 Maximum Six-Minute Average of Visible Emissions (%-opacity)

- - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Stack Gas Average Flow Rate (acfm) 23,214 22,051 22,600 22,621 21,926 21,813 21,517 21,752 Stack Gas Average Flow Rate (scfm) 14,939 14,329 14,559 14,609 14,101 14,113 13,911 14,042 Stack Gas Average Flow Rate (dscfm) 13,517 12,839 13,062 13,139 12,687 12,695 12,471 12,618 Stack Gas Average Velocity (fpm) 1,882 1,788 1,833 1,834 1,812 1,803 1,778 1,798 Stack Gas Average Static Pressure (in-H 2 O) -1.00 -1.00 -1.10 -1.03 -0.21 -0.23 -0.20 -0.21 Stack Gas Average Temperature (°F) 350 343 349 347 351 346 347 348 Stack Gas Percent by Volume Moisture (%H 2 O) 9.52 10.40 10.28 10.07 10.03 10.05 10.35 10.14

Measured Stack Inner Diameter (in)† 47.3 x 47.8 47.3 x 47.8 47.3 x 47.8 47.3 x 47.8 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1 Percent by Volume Carbon Dioxide in Stack Gas (Dry Basis) (%CO 2 ) 3.00 2.67 2.50 2.72 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 Percent by Volume Oxygen in Stack Gas (Dry Basis) (%O 2 ) 15.50 15.50 14.83 15.28 15.00 15.00 15.33 15.11 Percent by Volume Nitrogen in Stack Gas (Dry Basis) (%N 2 ) 81.50 81.83 82.67 82.00 82.50 82.50 82.17 82.39 * Production data was supplied by Glen-Gery Corporation personnel. † The Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct was elliptical in shape. 

### Table 2.2 - Emission Results

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 6 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant



## 3.0 PLANT AND SAMPLING LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS 3.1 Process Description and Operation Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant operates two natural gas-fired tunnel kilns. The kilns produce brick of various sizes and colors. Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102) has been fitted with a dry limestone absorber (DLA) system manufactured by Hellmich to control Hydrogen Fluoride and Hydrogen Chloride emissions. Kiln No. 2 was in operation during the performance of this test. Figure 3.1 depicts the process schematic. 3.2 Control Equipment Description During this test emissions from the Kiln No. 2 were controlled by the DLA and the bypass damper was closed. The DLA system is comprised of a limestone cascade absorber equipped with a limestone silo located atop the DLA and an extraction system to provide crushed limestone to the cascade absorber tower. Exhaust gas from the kiln is passed through the absorber to the crushed limestone which is slowly extracted from the base of the absorber. The absorber is equipped with a peeling drum that mechanically removes the reacted layer from the crushed limestone. The "peeled" limestone is pneumatically conveyed from the peeling drum back to the limestone feed bin, located on top of the absorber. The reacted layer that has been peeled from the limestone is discharged via gravity to a hopper for disposal. 3.3 Flue Gas Sampling Locations
3.3.1 - Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct The Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct was elliptical in shape with measured inner diameters of 47.3-inches and 47.8- inches. The duct was oriented in the horizontal plane and was accessed from a permanent platform. Two (2) 4.0-inch I.D. sampling ports were located 90° apart from one another at a location that met EPA Method 1, Section 11.1.1 criteria. On the day of the test, the stack was traversed to verify the absence of cyclonic flow. An average yaw angle of 7.67o was measured. Therefore, the sampling location also met EPA Method 1, Section 11.4.2 criteria. During emissions sampling, the stack was traversed for stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, HCl, and HF concentration determinations.

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 7 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant



## 3.3.2 - Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack The Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack was cicular in shape with a measured inner diameter of 47.1-inches. The stack was oriented in the vertical plane and was accessed from a permanent platform. Two (2) 3.7-inch I.D. sampling ports were located 90° apart from one another at a location that met EPA Method 1, Section 11.1.1 criteria. On the day of the test, the stack was traversed to verify the absence of cyclonic flow. An average yaw angle of 6.25o was measured. Therefore, the sampling location also met EPA Method 1, Section 11.4.2 criteria. During emissions sampling, the stack was traversed for stack gas volumetric flow rate, dry molecular weight, moisture content, total filterable PM, HCl, and HF concentration determinations. Figures 3.2 and 3.3 schematically illustrate the traverse point and sample port locations utilized. 3.4 Process Sampling Location Process sampling was completed by Glen-Gery as part of their QA/QC program and included raw material sampling at the pug mill as well as Fire Check Key testing in the kiln. In addition, 1⁄2 brick was removed from cars after the drier/prior to kiln entry as well as at kiln exit for purposes of mass balance testing if results of the stack test did not indicate compliance. Results from the QA/QC testing were unavailable at the time of this report.

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 8 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant



## Figure 3.1 - Tunnel Kiln Process Schematic Tunnel Kiln EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 26A sampling locationAtmosphere

Green Brick from Dryers

Natural Gas

Fired Brick Cascade Adsorber LS Feed Silo

Peeling Drum Extraction ScrewRecycle LS 

### DLA

Bypass Damper Closed

Reacted LS to Covered Bins EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, and 26A sampling location Limestone From Trucks



### Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 9 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant



## Figure 3.2 - Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct Traverse Point Location Drawing

(2 ) 4.0 " Sampling Ports Located 90° Apart 100 .0" 2. 89 Equivalent Diameters Downstream From Disturbance 85 .0" 1. 78 Equivalent Diameters Upstream From Disturbance


### 47 .3 " x 47 .8 " I.D. Elliptical Stack

47 .3 " I.D. Port 2

Port 1 6.0"

8 7 9
10 11

12 5 6 4 3 2
1 6.5" % of Duct Depth Distance From

Inside Wall ( in.) Port 1 1.0 3.2 5.6 8.4 11 .8 16 .8 30 .5 35 .5 38 .9 41 .7 44 .1 46 .3 Point 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2.1

6.7 11 .8 17 .7 25 .0 35 .6 64 .4 75 .0 82 .3 88 .2 93 .3 97 .9 1.0 3.2 5.6 8.5 12 .0 17 .0 30 .8 35 .9 39 .3 42 .2 44 .6 46 .8 Distance From Inside Wall ( in.) Port 2



### Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 10 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant



## Figure 3.3 - Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Location Drawing47.1" I.D.



### Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 11 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant



## 4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 4.1 Test Methods 4.1.1 EPA Method 1: Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Source Principle: To aid in the representative measurement of pollutant emissions and/or total volumetric flow rate from a stationary source, a measurement site where the effluent stream is flowing in a known direction is selected, and the cross-section of the stack is divided into a number of equal areas. A traverse point is then located within each of these equal areas. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 4.1.2 EPA Method 2: Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate (Type S) Principle: The average gas velocity in a stack is determined from the gas density and from measurement of the average velocity head with a Type S (Stausscheibe or reverse type) pitot tube. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 4.1.3 EPA Method 3: Gas Analysis for the Determination of Dry Molecular Weight Principle: A gas sample is extracted from a stack by one of the following methods: (1) single-point, grab sampling; (2) single-point, integrated sampling; or (3) multi-point, integrated sampling. The gas sample is analyzed for percent CO 2 

## , percent O 2 

## , and if necessary, for percent CO. For dry molecular weight determination a Fyrite analyzer will be used for the analysis. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 4.1.4 EPA Method 4: Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases Principle: A gas sample is extracted at a constant rate from the source; moisture is removed from the sample stream and determined either volumetrically or gravimetrically. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 4.1.5 EPA Method 5: Determination of Particulate Emissions from Stationary Sources (Filterable PM only) Principle: Particulate matter (PM) is withdrawn isokinetically from the source and collected on a glass fiber filter maintained at a temperature in the range of 120 ± 14°C (248 ± 25°F) or such other temperature as specified by an applicable subpart of the standards or approved by the Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, for a particular application. The PM mass, which includes any material that condenses at or above the filtration temperature, is determined gravimetrically after removal of uncombined water. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. 4.1.6 EPA Method 9: Visual Determination of the Opacity of Emissions from Stationary Sources Principle: The opacity of emissions from stationary sources is determined visually by a qualified observer. This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A.

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 12 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant



## 4.1.7 EPA Method 26A: Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions from Stationary SourcesIsokinetic Method Principle: This method is applicable for determining emissions of hydrogen halides (HX) [hydrogen chloride (HCl), hydrogen bromide (HBr), and hydrogen fluoride (HF)] and halogens (X 2 

## ) [chlorine (Cl 2 

## ) and bromine (Br 2 

## )] from stationary sources. This method collects the emission sample isokinetically and is therefore particularly suited for sampling at sources, such as those controlled by wet scrubbers, emitting acid particulate matter (e.g., hydrogen halides dissolved in water droplets). This method was utilized in its entirety as per the procedures outlined in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A. The sampling train utilized during this testing project is depicted in Figure 4.1. 4.2 Procedures for Obtaining Process Data Process data was recorded by Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant personnel utilizing their typical record keeping procedures. Recorded process data was provided to Air Compliance Testing, Inc. personnel at the conclusion of this test event. The process data is located in Table 2.2 and in the Appendix.

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 13 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant



## Figure 4.1 - EPA Method 5/26A Sampling Train Schematic Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 14 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant



## 5.0 INTERNAL QA/QC ACTIVITIES 5.1 QA Audits Tables 5.1 - 5.3 illustrate the QA audit activities that were performed during this test. All meter boxes and sampling trains used during sampling performed within the requirements of their respective methods as is shown in Tables 5.1.1 - 5.2. All pre-test and post-test leak checks were well below the applicable limit. Minimum metered volumes and percent isokinetics were also met where applicable. Table 5.3 displays the laboratory QA results for EPA Method 26A. The HCl spike recovery of 97% was within the normal range of 75% to 125%. All samples were analyzed in duplicate. Charles Giffels was certified on April 11, 2012 as a Visible Emissions Evaluator. The certification expires in six months from the issue date. For quality assurance, the observer obtained a view of the emissions with the best available contrasting background and with the sun oriented in the 140° sector to his back. Readings were taken every 15 seconds and made to the nearest 5% opacity.
5.2 QA/QC Problems No QA/QC problems occurred during this test event.

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 15 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant



## Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct Method 26A Sampling Train Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Leak Rate Observed (Pre/Post) (cfm) 0.003 / 0.000 0.003 / 0.001 0.001 / 0.001 Applicable Method Allowable Leak Rate (cfm) < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 Acceptable Yes Yes Yes Volume of Dry Gas Collected (dscf) 42.091 38.434 40.569 Recommended Volume of Dry Gas Collected (dscf) 36.00 36.00 36.00 Acceptable Yes Yes Yes Percent of Isokinetic Sampling Rate (%) 100.5 96.6 100.2 Applicable Method Allowable Isokinetic Sampling Rate (%) 100 ± 10 100 ± 10 100 ± 10 Acceptable Yes Yes Yes


## Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack Method 5/26A Sampling Train Run 1 Run 2 Run 3

Leak Rate Observed (Pre/Post) (cfm) 0.003 / 0.000 0.003 / 0.000 0.002 / 0.002 Applicable Method Allowable Leak Rate (cfm) < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 Acceptable Yes Yes Yes Volume of Dry Gas Collected (dscf) 59.713 59.612 57.707 Recommended Volume of Dry Gas Collected (dscf) 50.00 50.00 50.00 Acceptable Yes Yes Yes Percent of Isokinetic Sampling Rate (%) 103.1 101.8 101.4 Applicable Method Allowable Isokinetic Sampling Rate (%) 100 ± 10 100 ± 10 100 ± 10 Acceptable Yes Yes Yes 

## Table 5.1 - Sample Train Audit Results Table

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 16 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant



## Kiln No. 2 DLA Inlet Duct - Method 26A

Pre-Test Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Y) Average Post-Test

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Check Value (Yqa) Post Test Dry Gas

Meter Calibration Check Value Difference From Pre-Test Calibration Factor (%) Applicable Method

Allowable Difference (%) Acceptable 0.9876 1.0021 1.47% 5.00% Yes



## Kiln No. 2 DLA Exhaust Stack - Method 5/26A

Pre-Test Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Y) Average Post-Test

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Check Value (Yqa) Post Test Dry Gas

Meter Calibration Check Value Difference From Pre-Test Calibration Factor (%) Applicable Method

Allowable Difference (%) Acceptable 0.9897 0.9864 -0.34% 5.00% Yes



## Table 5.2 - Dry Gas Meter Audit Results Table

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 17 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant



### HCl Spike Recovery (%) 

## 97.0 Acceptable per Applicable Method (Yes / No)

(Expected Range 75% - 125%) 

## Yes


## Table 5.3 - EPA Method 26A Laboratory Recovery Analysis Results Table

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 18 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant



## 6.0 APPENDIX Appendix attached.

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 19 

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805

# APPENDIX to 

# Compliance Stack Emission Test Report 

# Determination of Hydrochloric Acid and Hydrofluoric Acid Reduction Efficiency and Filterable Particulate Matter and

Visible Emissions Natural Gas-Fired Tunnel Kiln No. 2

(Source ID: 102) EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9 and 26A Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant

York, Pennsylvania Date Conducted: August 30, 2012 Job Number: 120805

Prepared by: 

# Air Compliance Testing, Inc.

PO Box 41156 Cleveland OH 44141-0156 Phone: (800) EPA-AIR1 (372-2471) 

### Report Date: September 27, 2012

# Appendix Contents 1-PROCESS DATA Process Operational Data 

### 2-LABORATORY DATA Laboratory Results 

### 3-FIELD DATA A B Excel Test Data A B Excel Method Specific Data A B Excel Run Data A B Example Calculation Test Log (CEMS Methods) Main Method Field Data Sheets A B Isokinetic Field Data Sheets A B EPA Method 9 Field Data A B EPA Method 4 and ALT-008 Moisture Recovery A B EPA Method 3 Fyrite/Orsat Field Data A B EPA Method 3 Dry Molecular Weight Calculation EPA Method 2 Flow Data Sheets A B EPA Method 1 Cyclonic Flow A B EPA Method 1 Preliminary Field Data


### 4-CALIBRATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS ANALYZER CALIBRATIONS Analyzer Calibration Error Analyzer System Bias and System Drift EQUIPMENT INSPECTIONS / CALIBRATIONS Probe Nozzle Inspections Pre-Test Pitot Tube / Probe Inspections Post-Test Pitot Tube / Probe Inspections Pre-Test Thermocouple System Audit Post-Test Thermocouple Check 10-Minute Cals Pre-Test Meter Box Leak Check Pre-Test Dry Gas Meter / Orifice Calibration Pre-Test Meter Console Calibration Post-Test dry Gas Meter ALT-009 Leak Check Post-Test Dry Gas Meter / Orifice and Console Calibration Post-Test Mini Meter / Orifice and Console Calibration EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATIONS / HISTORY Dry Gas Meter Calibration History Aneroid Barometer/ DPG Calibration History Acetone Residuals History Calibration Gas Certifications Calibration Gas Diluter Certifications Quartz or Glass Fiber Filter Certification True Primary Flow Standard Reference Meter Calibration Micromanometer Certificate : Thermocouple Certificate of Calibration Lake Balance (Method 4 and ALT-008) Lake Balance Report for H64 (Gravimetrics) VE Azimuth Tables VE Declination VE Certificates Intent to Test Notification / Test Protocol Air Compliance Testing, Inc.
- 0-Appendix Content - 120805 Document Control No.: RPT-APP-001B Revised: February 20, 2012Location Run #'s Date Push Rate (Min.) Pieces

Per Car Weight/Brick

(lbs) Throughput

(Tons/Hr) Actual

Throughput (Tons/Hr) Max.

Throughput (Tons/Hr) % of Max. Product Type Size Color
1980 3.8 10.75 Extruded Cored Modular Red Matt 288 5 2.06 Extruded Solid Modular 213

Source min/hour of

extraction Kiln #2 11.22



## 1, 2, 3 12.90 99.3%
Type and Grade of Limestone: OldCastle Industrial Minerals - #1 Coarse Product

Screened CaCO 3 limestone

Extraction Rates: 

## York Plant Stack Test Process Data - August 30, 2012

Kiln #2 8/30/2012 21 12.81

### Your P.O. #: 120805 Your Project #: 120805

Attention: TateStrickler Air Compliance Testing Inc. P.O. Box 41156 Cleveland, OH USA 4414-0156 Report Date: 2012/09/20 

### CERTIFICATE

OF ANALYSIS MAXXAMJOB#: B2D7195 Received: 2012/09/06, 13:10 Sample Matrix: Stack Sampling Train # Samples Received: 7
Date Date Method Analyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method Reference Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. 7 2012/09/13 2012/09/13 BRL SOP-00108 EPA Method 26A Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 7 N/A 2012/09/13 * RPDs calculated using raw data. The rounding of final results may result in the apparent difference.


### Encryption Key
Please direct all questions regarding this Certificate of Analysis to your Project Manager. Clayton Johnson, Project Manager Email: CJohnson@maxxam.ca Phone# (905) 817-5769

==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Total cover pages: 1
Page 1 of 8

### Air Compliance Testing Inc.

Maxxam Job #: B2D7195 Client Project #: 120805 Report Date: 2012/09/20 Your P.O. #: 120805



### EPA M26A HYDROGEN HALIDES AND HALOGENS (STACK SAMPLING TRAIN) Maxxam ID O T 3 6 3 0 O T 3 6 3 1 O T 3 6 3 2 Sampling Date 2012/08/30 2012/08/30 2012/08/30 11:01 10:05 11:50 U n i t s BLANK-120805-M26A/BH1 RDL 1-120805A-M26A/BH1 RDL 2-120805A-M26A/BH1 RDL QC Batch

Sulfuric Acid Volume ml 396 1 432 1 466 1 2969455 Miscellaneous Parameters Hydrochloric Acid ug <200 200 5700 200 6600 200 2969477 Hydrofluoric Acid ug <200 200 94000 1000 99000 2000 2969477 RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID O T 3 6 3 2 O T 3 6 3 3 O T 3 6 3 4 Sampling Date 2012/08/30 2012/08/30 2012/08/30 11:50 13:38 10:20 U n i t s 2-120805A-M26A/BH1 RDL 3-120805A-M26A/BH1 RDL 1-120805B-M26A/BH1 RDL QC Batch

Lab-Dup

Sulfuric Acid Volume ml 1 427 1 467 1 2969455 Miscellaneous Parameters Hydrochloric Acid ug 6600 200 6300 200 5500 200 2969477 Hydrofluoric Acid ug 100000 2000 94000 1000 16000 200 2969477 RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Maxxam ID O T 3 6 3 5 O T 3 6 3 6 Sampling Date 2012/08/30 2012/08/30 12:11 13:22 U n i t s 2-120805B-M26A/BH1 3-120805B-M26A/BH1 RDL QC Batch

Sulfuric Acid Volume ml 463 448 1 2969455 Miscellaneous Parameters Hydrochloric Acid ug 5400 5400 200 2969477 Hydrofluoric Acid ug 16000 15000 200 2969477 RDL = Reportable Detection Limit QC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 8

### Air Compliance Testing Inc.

Maxxam Job #: B2D7195 Client Project #: 120805 Report Date: 2012/09/20 Your P.O. #: 120805 

### Test Summary

Maxxam ID OT3630 Collected 2012/08/30 Sample ID BLANK-120805-M26A/BH1 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/09/06 Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2969477 2012/09/13 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2969455 N/A 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern
Maxxam ID OT3631 Collected 2012/08/30 Sample ID 1-120805A-M26A/BH1 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/09/06 Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2969477 2012/09/13 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2969455 N/A 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern
Maxxam ID OT3632 Collected 2012/08/30 Sample ID 2-120805A-M26A/BH1 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/09/06 Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2969477 2012/09/13 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2969455 N/A 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern
Maxxam ID OT3632 D u p Collected 2012/08/30 Sample ID 2-120805A-M26A/BH1 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/09/06 Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2969477 2012/09/13 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern
Maxxam ID OT3633 Collected 2012/08/30 Sample ID 3-120805A-M26A/BH1 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/09/06 Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2969477 2012/09/13 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2969455 N/A 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern
Maxxam ID OT3634 Collected 2012/08/30 Sample ID 1-120805B-M26A/BH1 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/09/06 Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2969477 2012/09/13 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2969455 N/A 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern

Page 3 of 8

### Air Compliance Testing Inc.

Maxxam Job #: B2D7195 Client Project #: 120805 Report Date: 2012/09/20 Your P.O. #: 120805 

### Test Summary

Maxxam ID OT3635 Collected 2012/08/30 Sample ID 2-120805B-M26A/BH1 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/09/06 Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2969477 2012/09/13 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2969455 N/A 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern
Maxxam ID OT3636 Collected 2012/08/30 Sample ID 3-120805B-M26A/BH1 Shipped Matrix Stack Sampling Train Received 2012/09/06 Test Description Instrumentation Batch Extracted Analyzed Analyst Hydrogen Halides in H2SO4 Imp. IC/SPEC 2969477 2012/09/13 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern Volume of Sulfuric Acid Impinger 2969455 N/A 2012/09/13 Ann-Marie Stern

Page 4 of 8

### Air Compliance Testing Inc.

Maxxam Job #: B2D7195 Client Project #: 120805 Report Date: 2012/09/20 Your P.O. #: 120805

GENERAL COMMENTS Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 5 of 8

### Air Compliance Testing Inc. Attention: Tate Strickler Client Project #: 120805 P.O. #: 120805 Site Location: 

### Quality Assurance Report Maxxam Job Number: GB2D7195 QA/QC Date Batch Analyzed Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value %Recovery Units QC Limits 2969477 A_S Matrix Spike

(OT3632) Hydrochloric Acid 2012/09/13 102 % 80 - 120

Hydrofluoric Acid 2012/09/13 107 % 80 - 120 Spiked Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2012/09/13 101 % 90 - 110

Hydrofluoric Acid 2012/09/13 103 % 90 - 110 Method Blank Hydrochloric Acid 2012/09/13 <200 ug

Hydrofluoric Acid 2012/09/13 <200 ug RPD - Sample/Sample Dup Hydrochloric Acid 2012/09/13 0.6 % 20

Hydrofluoric Acid 2012/09/13 2.1 % 20 Matrix Spike: A sample to which a known amount of the analyte of interest has been added. Used to evaluate sample matrix interference. Spiked Blank: A blank matrix to which a known amount of the analyte has been added. Used to evaluate analyte recovery. Method Blank: A blank matrix containing all reagents used in the analytical procedure. Used to identify laboratory contamination.

Page 6 of 8

## Validation SignaturePage

Maxxam Job #: B2D7195

The analytical data and all QC contained in this report were reviewed and validated by the following individual(s).

Frank Mo, B.Sc., Inorganic Lab. Manager

==================================================================== Maxxam has procedures in place to guard against improper use of the electronic signature and have the required "signatories", as per section 5.10.2 of ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E), signing the reports. For Service Group specific validation please refer to the Validation Signature Page.

Page 7 of 8Page 8 of 8Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA Inlet Duct TEST DATA Number of Test Runs 3 Traverse Points 24 Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Stack Cross-Sectional Diameter 1 ( circular ) (in) 47.3 47.3 47.3 47.3 Stack Cross-Sectional Diameter 2 ( circular ) (in) 47.8 47.8 47.8 47.8

Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Barometric Pressure at Ground Leve l (Pbar) (in Hg) 29.64 29.64 29.64 29.64 Elevation Difference Between Ground Level and Meter Box Locations (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Elevation Difference Between Ground Level and Sampling Locations (ft) 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 Initial Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft3) 630.804 672.964 713.989 Final Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft3) 673.975 713.903 757.775 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Gamma) 0.9876 0.9876 0.9876 0.9876 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Coefficient (Delta H@) 1.876 1.876 1.876 1.876

Total Sampling Run Time (Theta) (min) 72 72 72 72 Volume of Water Vapor Condensed in the Impingers (g) 81.7 86.4 89.3 85.8 Weight of Water Vapor Collected in Silica Gel (g) 12.2 8.2 9.3 9.9 Air Percent by Volume Carbon Dioxide in Stack Gas (%-dry) 3.00 2.67 2.50 2.72 Air Percent by Volume Oxygen in Stack Gas (%-dry) 15.50 15.50 14.83 15.28 Air Percent by Volume Nitrogen in Stack Gas (%-dry) 81.50 81.83 82.67 82.00 Average Pitot Rotation Angle Port Number 1 9.5 Port Number 2 5.8 Test Run Start Time (hrmin) 8/30/2012 8:13 8/30/2012 9:53 8/30/2012 11:39 Test Run Stop Time (hrmin) 8/30/2012 9:30 8/30/2012 11:14 8/30/2012 12:56
DETAILED RESULTS Stack Gas Conditions Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Stack Cross-Sectional Area (A) (ft2) 12.332 12.332 12.332 12.332 Barometric Pressure at Sampling Location (in Hg) 29.63 29.63 29.63 29.63 Dry Molecular Weight of Stack Gas (Md) (lb/lb-mole) 29.10 29.05 28.99 29.05 Wet Molecular Weight of Stack Gas (Ms) (lb/lb-mole) 28.04 27.90 27.86 27.93 Average Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps) (in Hg) 29.55 29.55 29.54 29.55 Average Stack Gas Static Pressure (ps) (in H2O) -1.00 -1.00 -1.10 -1.03 Average Stack Gas Temperature (ts) (°F) 350.4 342.5 349.3 347.4 Average Stack Gas Temperature (Ts) (°R) 810.4 802.5 809.3 807.4 Average Stack Gas Velocity (Vs) (ft/sec) 31.37 29.80 30.54 30.57 Average Stack Gas Velocity (Vs) (ft/min) 1,882 1,788 1,833 1,834 Wet Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Actual Conditions (Qaw) (acfm) 23,214 22,051 22,600 22,621 Wet Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (scfm) 14,939 14,329 14,559 14,609 Dry Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qstd) (dscfm) 13,517 12,839 13,062 13,139 Percent by Volume Moisture as measured in Stack Gas (%H2O) 9.52 10.40 10.28 10.07 Test Results Volume of Dry Gas Sampled at Standard Conditions (Vmstd) (dscf) 42.091 38.434 40.569 40.365

Rate of Dry Gas Sampled at Standard Conditions (dscfm) 0.585 0.534 0.563 0.561 Predicted1-Hour Sample Volume Based on Current Sampling Rate (dscf) 35.076 32.029 33.807 33.637 Dry Mole Fraction of Flue Gas (Mfd) (1-bw/100) 0.905 0.896 0.897 0.899 Average Velocity Pressure (Delta P) (in H2O) 0.1963 0.1800 0.1863 0.1875

Average Square Root of Delta P 0.4418 0.4206 0.4290 0.4305 Average Pressure Differential of Orifice Meter (Delta H) (in H2O) 1.1504 1.0771 1.1492 1.1256 Average DGM Temperature (tm) (°F) 71.333 91.708 99.125 87.389 Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature (Tm) (°R) 531.333 551.708 559.125 547.389 Volume of Metered Gas Sample (Vm) (dry) (acf) 43.171 40.939 43.786 42.632

Post-Test Calibration (Yqa) 0.9845 1.0247 0.9970 1.0021 Post-Test/Pre-Test Calibration Factor Difference (%) 0.31 -3.75 -0.96 -1.47 SAMPLING QA Current Predicted Allowable Post-Test Leak Rate (dscfm) 0.020 0.020 0.020 Current Sampling Rate Status OK OK OK Probe Nozzle Diameter (in) 0.312 0.312 0.312 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate (% I) 100.5 96.6 100.2

In Field Isokinetic QA GOOD GOOD GOOD Count of Velocity Pressure Readings Below 0.05 in H2O 0 0 0 Sensitivity Factor for Differential Pressure Gauge (T) 1.013 1.014 1.014 Is Meter Box Manometer Adequate (Yes / No) ? YES YES YES

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 1 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805ACompliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA Inlet Duct 

### MEASURED DATA FROM TEST RUNS

Point Count Run # Run

Time (min) Pitot Delta

P (in H2O) Square Root of Delta P Orifice

Delta H (in H2O) DGM

Temp OUT (°F) Average

DGM Temp (°F) Stack

Pressure (in H2O) Stack

Temp (°F) 1 1 0 0.22 0.469 1.30 63 63.00 -1 356 2 1 3 0.22 0.469 1.30 63 63.00 356 3 1 6 0.22 0.469 1.30 63 63.00 357 4 1 9 0.24 0.490 1.50 64 64.00 356 5 1 12 0.21 0.458 1.30 65 65.00 354 6 1 15 0.21 0.458 1.30 66 66.00 353 7 1 18 0.18 0.424 1.00 67 67.00 352 8 1 21 0.18 0.424 1.00 68 68.00 350 9 1 24 0.20 0.447 1.20 68 68.00 350 10 1 27 0.20 0.447 1.20 69 69.00 348 11 1 30 0.20 0.447 1.20 70 70.00 349 12 1 33 0.16 0.400 0.93 71 71.00 340 13 1 36 0.23 0.480 1.30 72 72.00 342 14 1 39 0.23 0.480 1.30 73 73.00 342 15 1 42 0.23 0.480 1.30 74 74.00 345 16 1 45 0.22 0.469 1.30 75 75.00 348 17 1 48 0.20 0.447 1.20 76 76.00 349 18 1 51 0.20 0.447 1.20 77 77.00 350 19 1 54 0.18 0.424 1.00 77 77.00 350 20 1 57 0.18 0.424 1.00 78 78.00 350 21 1 60 0.15 0.387 0.87 78 78.00 355 22 1 63 0.15 0.387 0.87 78 78.00 353 23 1 66 0.15 0.387 0.87 78 78.00 353 24 1 69 0.15 0.387 0.87 79 79.00 351 25 2 0 0.23 0.480 1.30 84 84.00 -1 345 26 2 3 0.23 0.480 1.30 85 85.00 345 27 2 6 0.23 0.480 1.30 86 86.00 346 28 2 9 0.23 0.480 1.30 89 89.00 352 29 2 12 0.22 0.469 1.30 89 89.00 354 30 2 15 0.20 0.447 1.16 90 90.00 352 31 2 18 0.13 0.361 0.75 91 91.00 350 32 2 21 0.12 0.346 0.70 91 91.00 352 33 2 24 0.12 0.346 0.70 92 92.00 353 34 2 27 0.12 0.346 0.70 92 92.00 355 35 2 30 0.11 0.332 0.64 92 92.00 235 36 2 33 0.09 0.300 0.52 92 92.00 270 37 2 36 0.20 0.447 1.24 91 91.00 353 38 2 39 0.24 0.490 1.49 92 92.00 352 39 2 42 0.22 0.469 1.36 93 93.00 357 40 2 45 0.22 0.469 1.36 93 93.00 359 41 2 48 0.21 0.458 1.30 94 94.00 356 42 2 51 0.17 0.412 1.05 94 94.00 356 43 2 54 0.15 0.387 0.93 94 94.00 355 44 2 57 0.17 0.412 1.05 94 94.00 350 45 2 60 0.20 0.447 1.24 92 92.00 354 46 2 63 0.18 0.424 1.12 96 96.00 346 47 2 66 0.17 0.412 1.05 97 97.00 344 48 2 69 0.16 0.400 0.99 98 98.00 330

Test Date: August 30, 2012 

### Page 2 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805ACompliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA Inlet Duct 

### MEASURED DATA FROM TEST RUNS

Point Count Run # Run

Time (min) Pitot Delta

P (in H2O) Square Root of Delta P Orifice

Delta H (in H2O) DGM

Temp OUT (°F) Average

DGM Temp (°F) Stack

Pressure (in H2O) Stack

Temp (°F) 49 3 0 0.22 0.469 1.36 96 96.00 -1.1 356 50 3 3 0.22 0.469 1.40 97 97.00 352 51 3 6 0.25 0.500 1.50 97 97.00 356 52 3 9 0.21 0.458 1.30 98 98.00 357 53 3 12 0.21 0.458 1.30 98 98.00 355 54 3 15 0.18 0.424 1.10 99 99.00 358 55 3 18 0.18 0.424 1.10 99 99.00 355 56 3 21 0.18 0.424 1.10 100 100.00 350 57 3 24 0.18 0.424 1.10 100 100.00 344 58 3 27 0.21 0.458 1.30 100 100.00 340 59 3 30 0.22 0.469 1.40 100 100.00 346 60 3 33 0.17 0.412 1.05 100 100.00 342 61 3 36 0.21 0.458 1.30 98 98.00 347 62 3 39 0.21 0.458 1.30 99 99.00 345 63 3 42 0.24 0.490 1.48 99 99.00 344 64 3 45 0.22 0.469 1.35 99 99.00 348 65 3 48 0.21 0.458 1.29 100 100.00 348 66 3 51 0.19 0.436 1.17 100 100.00 346 67 3 54 0.12 0.346 0.74 100 100.00 346 68 3 57 0.12 0.346 0.74 100 100.00 350 69 3 60 0.12 0.346 0.74 100 100.00 349 70 3 63 0.14 0.374 0.86 100 100.00 351 71 3 66 0.13 0.361 0.80 100 100.00 350 72 3 69 0.13 0.361 0.80 100 100.00 349

Test Date: August 30, 2012 

### Page 3 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805ACompliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102) DLA Inlet Duct 

### TEST DATA
DETAILED RESULTS Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Emission Results: Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Emission Rate (lb/hr) 0.24 0.29 0.27 0.27 Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) Emission Rate (lb/hr) 3.99 4.37 4.00 4.12
LAB RESULTS HCL Sample and Calculation Data Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average HCl Volume of Filtered and Diluted Sample (VsHCl) (ml) 432.0 466.0 427.0 441.7 HCl Concentration of Sample, (SX ̄) (mg Cl ̄ / L) 13.2 14.2 14.8 14.0 HCl Concentration of Blank (BX ̄) (mg Cl ̄ / L) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 HCl Total Mass in sample, (mHCl) (mg) 5.70 6.60 6.30 6.20 Stack Gas Concentration Volume of Dry Gas Sampled at Standard Conditions (Vmstdm) (dscm) 1.192 1.088 1.149 1.143 HCl Concentration, dry basis (ConcHCl) (mg/dscm) 4.78 6.06 5.48 5.44

HCl Concentration (ppmvd) Dry @ 68F 3.15 4.00 3.62 3.59 HCl Concentration (ppmvw) Wet @ 68F 2.85 3.58 3.25 3.23
LAB RESULTS HF Sample and Calculation Data Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average HF Volume of Filtered and Diluted Sample (VsHF) (ml) 432.0 466.0 427.0 441.7 HF Concentration of Sample, (SX ̄) (mg F ̄ / L) 217.6 212.4 220.1 216.7 HF Concentration of Blank (BX ̄) (mg F ̄ / L) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 HF Total Mass in sample, (mHF) (mg) 94.00 99.00 94.00 95.67 Stack Gas Concentration HF Concentration, dry basis (ConcHF) (mg/dscm) 78.87 90.96 81.83 83.88 HF Concentration (ppmvd) Dry @ 68F 94.82 109.37 98.38 100.86 HF Concentration (ppmvw) Wet @ 68F 85.80 98.00 88.27 90.69

Test Date: August 30, 2012 

### Page 4 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805ACompliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA Inlet Duct 

### EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, and 26A Nomenclature and

Sample Calculations Run No. - 1 Constants CO 2 Fwt= 44.0 in wg= 0.073529 NO 2 Fwt= 46.01 HClF wt= 36.46

O 2 Fwt= 32.0 gr= 0.000142857 COF wt= 28.01 SO 2 Fwt= 64.06 CON 2 Fwt= 28.0 mmBtu= 1000000 Btu H 2 SO 4 Fwt= 98.08 Cl 2 Fwt= 70.91 H 2 OFwt= 18.0 CFwt= 12.011 T std = 528 P std = 29.92 PFwt= 44.0962 HFFwt= 20.006 Stack Variables

Cp = 0.84 pitot tube coefficient (dimensionless) P bar= 29.64 in. Hg barometric pressure E box = 0 ft elevation difference between ground level and meter box E sam = 15 ft elevation difference between ground level and sampling ports J 0.9876 gamma, dry gas meter calibration factor (dimensionless) T 72.0 min net run time (minutes) V lc= 93.9 g total mass of liquid collected in impingers (g) %CO 2= 3.00 % percent CO 2by volume (dry basis) (dimensionless) %O 2= 15.50 % percent O 2by volume (dry basis) (dimensionless) %N 2= 81.50 % percent N 2by volume (dry basis) (dimensionless) A = 12.3315 ft 2 stack cross-sectional area P g= -1.00 in. H 2 O flue gas static pressure T savg= 810.38 R average absolute flue gas temperature (460R+tsavg °F) SQ' P avg= 0.44 in. wg average square root ' P ' H = 1.15 in. wg average pressure differential of orifice meter T m = 531.33 R dry gas meter temperature (460R+tsavg °F) V m = 43.17 ft 3 volume of metered gas sample (dry actual cubic feet) 

### Calculated Stack Variables Barometric pressure at sampling location NOTE: Barometric pressure recorded at ground level

P sam =P bar- [ ( E sam / 100 ft ) * 0.1 in. Hg ] P sam = 29.64 - ( ( 15.0 / 100 ) * 0.1 ) P sam = 29.63 in. Hg Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions (dscf)

V mstd= J * Vm * [ P bar- ( [ ( E box

/ 100 ft ) * 0.1 in. Hg ] + ( ' H / 13.6 ) ) / P std] * ( T std/ T m ) V mstd= 0.9876 * 43.171 * ( ( 29.64 - ( ( 0.0 / 100 ) * 0.1 ) + ( 1.1504 / 13.6 ) ) / 29.92 ) * ( 528.0 / 531.333 ) V mstd= 42.091 ft 3 Volume of water vapor at standard conditions (68 °F, scf)

Vwstd= ( 0.04715 ft 3/g ) * Vlc
Vwstd= ( 0.04715 * 93.9 ) Vwstd= 4.4 ft 3

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 5 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805ACompliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA Inlet Duct
Percent moisture by volume as measured in flue gas %H 2 O ( Measured ) = 100 * [ V wstd/ ( Vwstd+ V mstd) ] %H 2 O ( Measured ) = 100 * ( 4.427 / ( 4.427 + 42.091 ) ) %H 2 O ( Measured ) = 9.52 %H 2 O (Saturated) = ( 100 / P sam ) * 10 ^ ( 6.6911 - ( 3144 / ( T savg+ 390.86 - 460 ) ) ) %H 2 O (Saturated) = ( 100 / 29.551471 ) * 10 ^ ( 6.6911 - ( 3144 / ( 810.375000 + 390.86 - 460 ) ) ) %H 2 O (Saturated) = 952.91

%H 2 O = 9.52 Absolute flue gas pressure

P s=P sam + ( Pg / 13.6 ) P s= 29.63 + ( -1.00 / 13.6 ) P s= 29.55 in. Hg Dry mole fraction of flue gas (dimensionless)

M fd= 1 - ( %H 2 O / 100 ) M fd= 1 - ( 9.52 / 100 ) M fd= 0.905 Dry molecular weight of flue gas (lb/lb-mole)

M d= [ ( %CO 2/ 100 ) * 44.0 ] + [ ( %O 2/ 100 ) * 32.0 ] + [ ( ( 100 - %CO 2- %O 2) / 100 ) * 28.0 ] M d= ( ( 3.00 / 100 ) * 44.0 ) + ( ( 15.50 / 100 ) * 32.0 ) + ( ( ( 100 - 3.00 - 15.50 ) / 100 ) * 28.0 ) M d= 29.10 lb/lb-mole M d= 29.10 Wet molecular weight of flue gas (lb/lb-mole)

M s= M d* M fd+ ( H 2 OFwt* ( %H 2 O / 100 ) ) M s= 29.100 * 0.905 + 18.00 * ( 9.52 / 100 ) M s= 28.04 lb/lb-mole Average flue gas velocity (ft/sec)

v s= 85.49 * Cp * ( SQ ' P avg) * ( Tavg/ ( P s* M s) ) 0.5

v s= 85.49 * 0.84 * ( 0.4418 ) * ( 810.38 / ( 29.551 * 28.044 ) ) ^ 0.5

v s= 31.37 ft/sec

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 6 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805ACompliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation - York Plant Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA Inlet Duct Wet volumetric flue gas flow rate at actual conditions (acfm)

Q aw =v s* A * 60 sec/min Q aw = 31.374 * 12.332 * 60 Q aw = 23,214 ft 3/min Wet volumetric flue gas flow rate at standard conditions (scfm)

Q sdw =v s* A * ( T std/ T savg) * ( P s/ P std) * 60 sec/min Q sdw = 31.374 * 12.332 * ( 528.0 / 810.375 ) * ( 29.551 / 29.92 ) * 60 Q sdw = 14,939 ft 3/min Dry volumetric flue gas flow rate at standard conditions (dscfm)

Q sd=M fd* v s* A * ( T std/ T savg) * ( P s/ P std) * 60 sec/min Q sd= 0.905 * 31.3744 * 12.3315 * ( 528.0 / 810.375 ) * ( 29.551 / 29.92 ) * 60 Q sd= 13,517 ft 3/min 

### Isokinetic Calculations Percent isokinetic of sampling rate (%)

%I = ( P std/ T std) * ( T savg/ P s) * [ V mstd/ ( vs* M fd* T* S* ( D n/ 2 ) 2) ] %I = ((((29.92 / 528.0) * (810.375 / 29.551)) * (42.091 / (31.3744 * 0.905 * 72.0 * (()3.141593 * (0.312 / 2) ^ 2) / 144))) / 60) * 100 %I = 100.5 % 

### Method 26A Calculations HCl concentration (ppmvd) HClppmvd = 3.15 ppmvd HCl mass emission rate (lb/hr) MERHCl = ( 60 min/hr * HCl ppmvd * HClF wt* lb * Q sd) / ( 385.3 ft3* 10 6) MERHCl = 60 * 3.155 * 36.46 * 13,517 ) / ( 385.3 * 10^6 ) MERHCl = 0.242 lb/hr HF concentration (ppmvd) HFppmvd = 94.82 ppmvd HF mass emission rate (lb/hr) MERHF = ( 60 min/hr * HF ppmvd * HFFwt * lb * Qsd ) / ( 385.3 ft3 * 10 6) MERHF = 60 * 94.822 * 20.01 * 13,517 ) / ( 385.3 * 10^6 ) MERHF = 3.99 lb/hr

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 7 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805ACompliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation- York Plant Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA Exhaust Stack TEST DATA Number of Test Runs 3 Traverse Points 12 Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Stack Cross-Sectional Diameter 1 ( circular ) (in) 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1 Stack Cross-Sectional Diameter 2 ( circular ) (in) 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1

Pitot Tube Coefficient (Cp) 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Barometric Pressure at Ground Leve l (Pbar) (in Hg) 29.64 29.64 29.64 29.64 Elevation Difference Between Ground Level and Meter Box Locations (ft) 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Elevation Difference Between Ground Level and Sampling Locations (ft) 60.00 60.00 60.00 60.00 Initial Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft3) 265.519 326.146 388.723 Final Dry Gas Meter Reading (ft3) 326.023 388.601 449.705 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor (Gamma) 0.9897 0.9897 0.9897 0.9897 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Coefficient (Delta H@) 2.135 2.135 2.135 2.135

Total Sampling Run Time (Theta) (min) 72 72 72 72 Volume of Water Vapor Condensed in the Impingers (g) 123.3 121.5 123.2 122.7 Weight of Water Vapor Collected in Silica Gel (g) 17.9 19.7 18.1 18.6 Air Percent by Volume Carbon Dioxide in Stack Gas (%-dry) 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 Air Percent by Volume Oxygen in Stack Gas (%-dry) 15.00 15.00 15.33 15.11 Air Percent by Volume Nitrogen in Stack Gas (%-dry) 82.50 82.50 82.17 82.39 Average Pitot Rotation Angle Port Number 1 5.7 Port Number 2 6.8 Test Run Start Time (hrmin) 8/30/2012 8:13 8/30/2012 9:53 8/30/2012 11:39 Test Run Stop Time (hrmin) 8/30/2012 9:30 8/30/2012 11:14 8/30/2012 12:56
DETAILED RESULTS Stack Gas Conditions Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Stack Cross-Sectional Area (A) (ft2) 12.100 12.100 12.100 12.100 Barometric Pressure at Sampling Location (in Hg) 29.58 29.58 29.58 29.58 Dry Molecular Weight of Stack Gas (Md) (lb/lb-mole) 29.00 29.00 29.01 29.00 Wet Molecular Weight of Stack Gas (Ms) (lb/lb-mole) 27.90 27.89 27.87 27.89 Average Absolute Stack Gas Pressure (Ps) (in Hg) 29.56 29.56 29.57 29.56 Average Stack Gas Static Pressure (ps) (in H2O) -0.21 -0.23 -0.20 -0.21 Average Stack Gas Temperature (ts) (°F) 351.3 346.3 347.0 348.2 Average Stack Gas Temperature (Ts) (°R) 811.3 806.3 807.0 808.2 Average Stack Gas Velocity (Vs) (ft/sec) 30.20 30.05 29.64 29.96 Average Stack Gas Velocity (Vs) (ft/min) 1,812 1,803 1,778 1,798 Wet Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Actual Conditions (Qaw) (acfm) 21,926 21,813 21,517 21,752 Wet Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (scfm) 14,101 14,113 13,911 14,042 Dry Volumetric Stack Gas Flow at Standard Conditions (Qstd) (dscfm) 12,687 12,695 12,471 12,618 Percent by Volume Moisture as measured in Stack Gas (%H2O) 10.03 10.05 10.35 10.14 Test Results Volume of Dry Gas Sampled at Standard Conditions (Vmstd) (dscf) 59.713 59.612 57.707 59.011

Rate of Dry Gas Sampled at Standard Conditions (dscfm) 0.829 0.828 0.801 0.820 Predicted1-Hour Sample Volume Based on Current Sampling Rate (dscf) 49.761 49.677 48.089 49.176 Dry Mole Fraction of Flue Gas (Mfd) (1-bw/100) 0.900 0.900 0.896 0.899 Average Velocity Pressure (Delta P) (in H2O) 0.1808 0.1800 0.1750 0.1786

Average Square Root of Delta P 0.4241 0.4231 0.4171 0.4214 Average Pressure Differential of Orifice Meter (Delta H) (in H2O) 2.6083 2.6500 2.5500 2.6028 Average DGM Temperature (tm) (°F) 67.833 85.833 90.417 81.361 Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature (Tm) (°R) 527.833 545.833 550.417 541.361 Volume of Metered Gas Sample (Vm) (dry) (acf) 60.504 62.455 60.982 61.314

Post-Test Calibration (Yqa) 0.9882 0.9812 0.9898 0.9864 Post-Test/Pre-Test Calibration Factor Difference (%) 0.15 0.86 -0.01 0.34 SAMPLING QA Current Predicted Allowable Post-Test Leak Rate (dscfm) 0.020 0.020 0.020 Probe Nozzle Diameter (in) 0.375 0.377 0.375 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate (% I) 103.1 101.8 101.4

In Field Isokinetic QA GOOD GOOD GOOD Count of Velocity Pressure Readings Below 0.05 in H2O 0 0 0 Sensitivity Factor for Differential Pressure Gauge (T) 1.014 1.014 1.014 Is Meter Box Manometer Adequate (Yes / No) ? YES YES YES

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 1 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805B

### Compliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation- York Plant Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102) DLA Exhaust Stack 

### MEASURED DATA FROM TEST RUNS

Point Count Run # Run

Time (min) Pitot Delta

P (in H2O) Square Root of Delta P Orifice

Delta H (in H2O) DGM

Temp OUT (°F) Average

DGM Temp (°F) Stack

Pressure (in H2O) Stack

Temp (°F) 1 1 0 0.20 0.447 2.90 65 65.00 -0.21 357 2 1 6 0.20 0.447 2.90 65 65.00 356 3 1 12 0.20 0.447 2.90 66 66.00 356 4 1 18 0.21 0.458 3.00 66 66.00 353 5 1 24 0.15 0.387 2.20 67 67.00 350 6 1 30 0.15 0.387 2.20 68 68.00 347 7 1 36 0.15 0.387 2.10 67 67.00 345 8 1 42 0.21 0.458 3.00 68 68.00 348 9 1 48 0.21 0.458 3.00 69 69.00 349 10 1 54 0.19 0.436 2.70 70 70.00 350 11 1 60 0.15 0.387 2.20 71 71.00 353 12 1 66 0.15 0.387 2.20 72 72.00 351 13 2 0 0.14 0.374 2.00 82 82.00 -0.23 346 14 2 6 0.14 0.374 2.00 83 83.00 346 15 2 12 0.20 0.447 2.90 84 84.00 346 16 2 18 0.20 0.447 2.90 85 85.00 348 17 2 24 0.20 0.447 3.00 85 85.00 348 18 2 30 0.15 0.387 2.30 86 86.00 347 19 2 36 0.18 0.424 2.80 86 86.00 346 20 2 42 0.20 0.447 2.90 87 87.00 345 21 2 48 0.20 0.447 2.90 87 87.00 346 22 2 54 0.20 0.447 2.90 88 88.00 346 23 2 60 0.20 0.447 2.90 88 88.00 347 24 2 66 0.15 0.387 2.30 89 89.00 345 25 3 0 0.15 0.387 2.20 88 88.00 -0.2 344 26 3 6 0.15 0.387 2.20 88 88.00 350 27 3 12 0.21 0.458 3.10 89 89.00 351 28 3 18 0.21 0.458 3.10 90 90.00 353 29 3 24 0.16 0.400 2.30 92 92.00 350 30 3 30 0.16 0.400 2.30 92 92.00 343 31 3 36 0.20 0.447 2.90 90 90.00 345 32 3 42 0.20 0.447 2.90 90 90.00 346 33 3 48 0.20 0.447 2.90 91 91.00 345 34 3 54 0.18 0.424 2.60 91 91.00 346 35 3 60 0.15 0.387 2.20 92 92.00 346 36 3 66 0.13 0.361 1.90 92 92.00 345

Test Date: August 30, 2012 

### Page 2 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805BCompliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation- York Plant Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA Exhaust Stack 

### TEST DATA Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Particulate Weight in Probe Rinse (mg) 46.40 47.50 44.20 46.03 Particulate Weight in Filter Catch (mg) 45.90 64.30 61.10 57.10
DETAILED RESULTS Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Emission Results Filterable Particulate Matter Emission Rate (lb/hr) 2.594 3.149 3.010 2.918 Filterable Particulate Matter Concentration (grains/dscf) 0.0239 0.0289 0.0282 0.0270

Test Date: August 30, 2012 

### Page 3 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805BCompliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation- York Plant Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102) DLA Exhaust Stack 

### TEST DATA
DETAILED RESULTS Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Emission Results: Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Emission Rate (lb/hr) 0.155 0.152 0.154 0.154 Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) Emission Rate (lb/hr) 0.450 0.451 0.429 0.443
LAB RESULTS HCL Sample and Calculation Data Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average HCl Volume of Filtered and Diluted Sample (VsHCl) (ml) 467.0 463.0 448.0 459.3 HCl Concentration of Sample, (SX ̄) (mg Cl ̄ / L) 11.8 11.7 12.1 11.8 HCl Concentration of Blank (BX ̄) (mg Cl ̄ / L) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 HCl Total Mass in sample, (mHCl) (mg) 5.50 5.40 5.40 5.43 Stack Gas Concentration Volume of Dry Gas Sampled at Standard Conditions (Vmstdm) (dscm) 1.691 1.688 1.634 1.671 HCl Concentration, dry basis (ConcHCl) (mg/dscm) 3.25 3.20 3.30 3.25

HCl Concentration (ppmvd) Dry @ 68F 2.15 2.11 2.18 2.15 HCl Concentration (ppmvw) Wet @ 68F 1.93 1.90 1.95 1.93
LAB RESULTS HF Sample and Calculation Data Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average HF Volume of Filtered and Diluted Sample (VsHF) (ml) 467.0 463.0 448.0 459.3 HF Concentration of Sample, (SX ̄) (mg F ̄ / L) 34.3 34.6 33.5 34.1 HF Concentration of Blank (BX ̄) (mg F ̄ / L) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 HF Total Mass in sample, (mHF) (mg) 16.00 16.00 15.00 15.67 Stack Gas Concentration HF Concentration, dry basis (ConcHF) (mg/dscm) 9.46 9.48 9.18 9.37 HF Concentration (ppmvd) Dry @ 68F 11.38 11.40 11.04 11.27 HF Concentration (ppmvw) Wet @ 68F 10.24 10.25 9.89 10.13

Test Date: August 30, 2012 

### Page 4 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805BCompliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation- York Plant Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA Exhaust Stack 

### EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 26A Nomenclature and

Sample Calculations Run No. - 1 Constants CO 2 F wt= 44.0 in wg= 0.073529 NO 2 F wt= 46.01 HClF wt= 36.46

O 2 F wt= 32.0 gr= 0.000142857 COFwt= 28.01 SO 2 F wt= 64.06 CON 2 F wt= 28.0 mmBtu= 1000000 Btu H 2 SO 4 F wt= 98.08 Cl 2 F wt= 70.91 H 2 OF wt= 18.0 CF wt= 12.011 T std = 528 P std = 29.92 PF wt= 44.0962 HFFwt= 20.006 Stack Variables

Cp = 0.84 pitot tube coefficient (dimensionless) P bar = 29.64 in. Hg barometric pressure E box = 5 ft elevation difference between ground level and meter box E sam = 60 ft elevation difference between ground level and sampling ports J 0.9897 gamma, dry gas meter calibration factor (dimensionless) T 72.0 min net run time (minutes) V lc= 141.2 g total mass of liquid collected in impingers (g) %CO 2= 2.50 % percent CO 2by volume (dry basis) (dimensionless) %O 2= 15.00 % percent O 2by volume (dry basis) (dimensionless) %N 2= 82.50 % percent N 2by volume (dry basis) (dimensionless) A = 12.0995 ft 2 stack cross-sectional area P g= -0.21 in. H 2 O flue gas static pressure T savg= 811.25 R average absolute flue gas temperature (460R+tsavg °F) SQ ' P avg= 0.42 in. wg average square root ' P ' H = 2.61 in. wg average pressure differential of orifice meter T m = 527.83 R dry gas meter temperature (460R+tsavg °F) V m = 60.50 ft 3 volume of metered gas sample (dry actual cubic feet) 

### Calculated Stack Variables Barometric pressure at sampling location NOTE: Barometric pressure recorded at ground level

P sam =P bar

- [ ( E sam / 100 ft ) * 0.1 in. Hg ] P sam = 29.64 - ( ( 60.0 / 100 ) * 0.1 ) P sam = 29.58 in. Hg Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions (dscf)

V mstd= J* Vm * [ P bar

- ( [ ( E box

/ 100 ft ) * 0.1 in. Hg ] + ( ' H / 13.6 ) ) / P std] * ( T std/ T m ) V mstd= 0.9897 * 60.504 * ( ( 29.64 - ( ( 5.0 / 100 ) * 0.1 ) + ( 2.6083 / 13.6 ) ) / 29.92 ) * ( 528.0 / 527.833 ) V mstd= 59.713 ft 3 Volume of water vapor at standard conditions (68 °F, scf)

Vwstd= ( 0.04715 ft 3/g ) * Vlc
Vwstd= ( 0.04715 * 141.2 ) Vwstd= 6.7 ft 3

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 5 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805BCompliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation- York Plant Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA Exhaust Stack Percent moisture by volume as measured in flue gas %H 2 O ( Measured ) = 100 * [ Vwstd/ ( Vwstd+ V mstd) ] %H 2 O ( Measured ) = 100 * ( 6.658 / ( 6.658 + 59.713 ) ) %H 2 O ( Measured ) = 10.03 %H 2 O (Saturated) = ( 100 / P sam ) * 10 ^ ( 6.6911 - ( 3144 / ( T savg+ 390.86 - 460 ) ) ) %H 2 O (Saturated) = ( 100 / 29.564559 ) * 10 ^ ( 6.6911 - ( 3144 / ( 811.250000 + 390.86 - 460 ) ) ) %H 2 O (Saturated) = 963.52

%H 2 O = 10.03 Absolute flue gas pressure

P s=P sam + ( Pg / 13.6 ) P s= 29.58 + ( -0.21 / 13.6 ) P s= 29.56 in. Hg Dry mole fraction of flue gas (dimensionless)

M fd= 1 - ( %H 2 O / 100 ) M fd= 1 - ( 10.03 / 100 ) M fd= 0.900 Dry molecular weight of flue gas (lb/lb-mole)

M d= [ ( %CO 2/ 100 ) * 44.0 ] + [ ( %O 2/ 100 ) * 32.0 ] + [ ( ( 100 - %CO 2- %O 2) / 100 ) * 28.0 ] M d= ( ( 2.50 / 100 ) * 44.0 ) + ( ( 15.00 / 100 ) * 32.0 ) + ( ( ( 100 - 2.50 - 15.00 ) / 100 ) * 28.0 ) M d= 29.00 lb/lb-mole M d= 29.00 Wet molecular weight of flue gas (lb/lb-mole)

M s= M d* M fd+ ( H 2 OF wt* ( %H 2 O / 100 ) ) M s= 29.000 * 0.900 + 18.00 * ( 10.03 / 100 ) M s= 27.90 lb/lb-mole Average flue gas velocity (ft/sec)

v s= 85.49 * Cp * ( SQ' P avg) * ( T avg/ ( P s* M s) ) 0.5

v s= 85.49 * 0.84 * ( 0.4241 ) * ( 811.25 / ( 29.565 * 27.897 ) ) ^ 0.5

v s= 30.20 ft/sec Wet volumetric flue gas flow rate at actual conditions (acfm)

Q aw=v s* A * 60 sec/min Q aw= 30.203 * 12.100 * 60 Q aw= 21,926 ft 3/min

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 6 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805BCompliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation- York Plant Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA Exhaust Stack
Wet volumetric flue gas flow rate at standard conditions (scfm)

Q sdw=v s* A * ( T std/ T savg) * ( P s/ P std) * 60 sec/min Q sdw= 30.203 * 12.100 * ( 528.0 / 811.250 ) * ( 29.565 / 29.92 ) * 60 Q sdw= 14,101 ft 3/min Dry volumetric flue gas flow rate at standard conditions (dscfm)

Q sd=M fd* vs* A * ( T std/ T savg) * ( P s/ P std) * 60 sec/min Q sd= 0.900 * 30.2026 * 12.0995 * ( 528.0 / 811.250 ) * ( 29.565 / 29.92 ) * 60 Q sd= 12,687 ft 3/min 

### Isokinetic Calculations Percent isokinetic of sampling rate (%)

%I = ( P std/ T std) * ( T savg/ P s) * [ V mstd/ ( v s* M fd* T* S* ( D n/ 2 ) 2) ] %I = ((((29.92 / 528.0) * (811.250 / 29.565)) * (59.713 / (30.2026 * 0.900 * 72.0 * (()3.141593 * (0.375 / 2) ^ 2) / 144))) / 60) * 100 %I = 103.1 % 

### Method 5 Calculations Filterable PM total catch weight (mg)

mg quan= 92.30 mg Filterable PM concentration (grains/dscf)

C grcm= 0.154322 * mg quan/ V mstd C grcm= 0.0154322 * 92.30 / 59.713 C grcm= 0.0239 gr/ft 3 Filterable PM mass emission rate (lb/hr) EMRlbhr = ( mg quan/ V mstd) * Q sd* ( 60 / 453592 ) EMRlbhr = 92.30 / 59.713 * 12,687 * ( 60 / 453592 ) EMRlbhr = 2.59 lb/hr

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 7 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805BCompliance Stack Emission Test Report Glen-Gery Corporation- York Plant Kiln No. 2 (Source ID: 102)

DLA Exhaust Stack



### Method 26A Calculations HCl concentration (ppmvd) HClppmvd = 2.15 ppmvd HCl mass emission rate (lb/hr) MERHCl = ( 60 min/hr * HCl ppmvd * HClF wt* lb * Q sd) / ( 385.3 ft 3* 10 6) MERHCl = 60 * 2.146 * 36.46 * 12,687 ) / ( 385.3 * 10^6 ) MERHCl = 0.155 lb/hr HF concentration (ppmvd) HFppmvd = 11.38 ppmvd HF mass emission rate (lb/hr) MERHF = ( 60 min/hr * HF ppmvd * HFFwt * lb * Qsd ) / ( 385.3 ft3 * 10 6) MERHF = 60 * 11.377 * 20.01 * 12,687 ) / ( 385.3 * 10^6 ) MERHF = 0.45 lb/hr

Test Date: August 30, 2012 Page 8 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. - 120805B

### Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Alignment and Tubing Dimensions

D  

### Probe / Pitot Number PIT-801 Level and Perpendicular D 

### No Obstructions No Damage
D  

### qD  

### q 2.0
D 

### qD  

### q 0.0 E 1 

### E  

### qE  

###  q 2.0 E 

### qE  

### q 3.0 E 2 

### J 2.00 T 0.00 A 0.836 

### T z= A tan J(< 0.125") 0.029 w= A tan T(< 0.03125") 0.000 D t

### (0.1875" < D t

### < 0.375") 0.375 P A

### (1.05D t

### < P A

### < 1.5D t

### ) 0.418 

# J P B

### (1.05D t

### < P B

### < 1.5D t

### ) 0.418

P A

### = P B

### ± 0.0625 0.000

Degree indicating level position for determining J then calculating Z. 

### Assembly Inter-Component Spacing Requirements Effective Length (in.) 97.20 W ( t3.0") 3.000 -or- AA ( t2.0") X D n 

### X / D n

### ( t1.5) Y ( t3.0") Z t0.75" 1.000 Degree indicating level position for determining D 1 and D2 .

Degree indicating level position for determining T .



### B A



## D t 

### 3.0 in.
0.75 in.



### D n



## x z W



## D t


## Y 3.0 in. 

### P A 

### P B 

### B A A



## D t



### D n



## x 2.0 in. 

## AA

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (Method 2.xls) Job Number: 120608AC Done By: PB/ Date: 7/12/2012 08:28

### Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Alignment and Tubing Dimensions

D  

### Probe / Pitot Number PIT-810 Level and Perpendicular D 

### No Obstructions No Damage
D  

### qD  

### q -1.0
D 

### qD  

### q -3.0 E 1 

### E  

### qE  

###  q 0.0 E 

### qE  

### q -2.0 E 2 

### J -1.00 T -3.00 A 0.918 

### T z= A tan J(< 0.125") -0.016 w= A tan T(< 0.03125") -0.048 D t

### (0.1875" < D t

### < 0.375") 0.375 P A

### (1.05D t

### < P A

### < 1.5D t

### ) 0.459 

# J P B

### (1.05D t

### < P B

### < 1.5D t

### ) 0.459

P A

### = P B

### ± 0.0625 0.000

Degree indicating level position for determining J then calculating Z. 

### Assembly Inter-Component Spacing Requirements Effective Length (in.) 97.70 W ( t3.0") 3.200 -or- AA ( t2.0") X D n 

### X / D n

### ( t1.5) Y ( t3.0") Z t0.75" 1.000 Degree indicating level position for determining D 1 and D 2 .

Degree indicating level position for determining T .



### B A



## D t 

### 3.0 in.
0.75 in.



### D n



## x z W



## D t


## Y 3.0 in. 

### P A 

### P B 

### B A A



## D t



### D n



## x 2.0 in. 

## AA

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (Method 2.xls) Job Number: 082412 Done By: PB/ Date: 8/24/2012 16:53

### Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Alignment and Tubing Dimensions

D  

### Probe / Pitot Number T-PRB-607 Level and Perpendicular D 

### No Obstructions No Damage
D  

### qD  

### q 0.0
D 

### qD  

### q 2.0 E 1 

### E  

### qE  

###  q 1.0 E 

### qE  

### q 1.0 E 2 

### J 2.00 T 1.00 A 0.938 

### T z= A tan J(< 0.125") 0.033 w= A tan T(< 0.03125") 0.016 D t

### (0.1875" < D t

### < 0.375") 0.375 P A

### (1.05D t

### < P A

### < 1.5D t

### ) 0.469 

# J P B

### (1.05D t

### < P B

### < 1.5D t

### ) 0.469

P A

### = P B

### ± 0.0625 0.000

Degree indicating level position for determining J then calculating Z. 

### Assembly Inter-Component Spacing Requirements Effective Length (in.) 62.60 W ( t3.0") -or- AA ( t2.0") 2.200 X 1.320 D n 

### 0.493 X / D n

### ( t1.5) 2.677 Y ( t3.0") 3.600 Z t0.75" 1.120 Degree indicating level position for determining D 1 and D2 .

Degree indicating level position for determining T .



### B A



## D t 

### 3.0 in.
0.75 in.



### D n



## x z W



## D t


## Y 3.0 in. 

### P A 

### P B 

### B A A



## D t



### D n



## x 2.0 in. 

## AA

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (Method 2.xls) Job Number: 120615A Done By: WD / Date: 7/23/2012 12:16

### Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Alignment and Tubing Dimensions

D  

### Probe / Pitot Number PRB-612 Level and Perpendicular D 

### No Obstructions No Damage
D  

### qD  

### q 0.0
D 

### qD  

### q 0.0 E 1 

### E  

### qE  

###  q 0.0 E 

### qE  

### q -2.0 E 2 

### J 0.00 T -1.00 A 0.912 

### T z= A tan J(< 0.125") 0.000 w= A tan T(< 0.03125") -0.016 D t

### (0.1875" < D t

### < 0.375") 0.375 P A

### (1.05D t

### < P A

### < 1.5D t

### ) 0.456 

# J P B

### (1.05D t

### < P B

### < 1.5D t

### ) 0.456

P A

### = P B

### ± 0.0625 0.000

Degree indicating level position for determining J then calculating Z. 

### Assembly Inter-Component Spacing Requirements Effective Length (in.) 68.60 W ( t3.0") -or- AA ( t2.0") 2.600 X 0.400 D n 

### 0.190 X / D n

### ( t1.5) 2.105 Y ( t3.0") 9.600 Z t0.75" Degree indicating level position for determining D 1 and D2 .

Degree indicating level position for determining T .



### B A



## D t 

### 3.0 in.
0.75 in.



### D n



## x z W



## D t


## Y 3.0 in. 

### P A 

### P B 

### B A A



## D t



### D n



## x 2.0 in. 

## AA

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (Method 2.xls) Job Number: 120824A Done By: PB/ Date: 8/24/2012 12:32

### Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Alignment and Tubing Dimensions

D  

### Probe / Pitot Number PRB-615 Level and Perpendicular D 

### No Obstructions No Damage
D  

### qD  

### q 0.0
D 

### qD  

### q 0.0 E 1 

### E  

### qE  

###  q 0.0 E 

### qE  

### q -2.0 E 2 

### J -2.00 T -1.00 A 1.100 

### T z= A tan J(< 0.125") -0.038 w= A tan T(< 0.03125") -0.019 D t

### (0.1875" < D t

### < 0.375") 0.375 P A

### (1.05D t

### < P A

### < 1.5D t

### ) 0.550 

# J P B

### (1.05D t

### < P B

### < 1.5D t

### ) 0.550

P A

### = P B

### ± 0.0625 0.000

Degree indicating level position for determining J then calculating Z. 

### Assembly Inter-Component Spacing Requirements Effective Length (in.) 69.50 W ( t3.0") -or- AA ( t2.0") 2.900 X 0.500 D n 

### 0.190 X / D n

### ( t1.5) 2.632 Y ( t3.0") 11.000 Z t0.75" Degree indicating level position for determining D 1 and D2 .

Degree indicating level position for determining T .



### B A



## D t 

### 3.0 in.
0.75 in.



### D n



## x z W



## D t


## Y 3.0 in. 

### P A 

### P B 

### B A A



## D t



### D n



## x 2.0 in. 

## AA

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (Method 2.xls) Job Number: 120824A Done By: PB/ Date: 8/24/2012 12:30

### Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Alignment and Tubing Dimensions

D  

### Probe / Pitot Number PIT-801 Level and Perpendicular D 

### No Obstructions No Damage
D  

### qD  

### q 1.0
D 

### qD  

### q 1.0 E 1 

### E  

### qE  

###  q 0.0 E 

### qE  

### q 4.0 E 2 

### J -3.00 T -2.00 A 0.828 

### T z= A tan J(< 0.125") -0.043 w= A tan T(< 0.03125") -0.029 D t

### (0.1875" < D t

### < 0.375") 0.375 P A

### (1.05D t

### < P A

### < 1.5D t

### ) 0.414 

# J P B

### (1.05D t

### < P B

### < 1.5D t

### ) 0.414

P A

### = P B

### ± 0.0625 0.000

Degree indicating level position for determining J then calculating Z. 

### Assembly Inter-Component Spacing Requirements Effective Length (in.) 97.30 W ( t3.0") 3.000 -or- AA ( t2.0") X D n 

### X / D n

### ( t1.5) Y ( t3.0") Z t0.75" 0.900 Degree indicating level position for determining D 1 and D2 .

Degree indicating level position for determining T .



### B A



## D t 

### 3.0 in.
0.75 in.



### D n



## x z W



## D t


## Y 3.0 in. 

### P A 

### P B 

### B A A



## D t



### D n



## x 2.0 in. 

## AA

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (Method 2.xls) Job Number: 120805A Done By: PB/ Date: 9/7/2012 11:22

### Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Alignment and Tubing Dimensions

D  

### Probe / Pitot Number PIT-810 Level and Perpendicular D 

### No Obstructions No Damage
D  

### qD  

### q -1.0
D 

### qD  

### q -1.0 E 1 

### E  

### qE  

###  q -2.0 E 

### qE  

### q 0.0 E 2 

### J 0.00 T -2.00 A 0.892 

### T z= A tan J(< 0.125") 0.000 w= A tan T(< 0.03125") -0.031 D t

### (0.1875" < D t

### < 0.375") 0.375 P A

### (1.05D t

### < P A

### < 1.5D t

### ) 0.446 

# J P B

### (1.05D t

### < P B

### < 1.5D t

### ) 0.446

P A

### = P B

### ± 0.0625 0.000

Degree indicating level position for determining J then calculating Z. 

### Assembly Inter-Component Spacing Requirements Effective Length (in.) 97.40 W ( t3.0") 3.000 -or- AA ( t2.0") X D n 

### X / D n

### ( t1.5) Y ( t3.0") Z t0.75" 0.800 Degree indicating level position for determining D 1 and D 2 .

Degree indicating level position for determining T .



### B A



## D t 

### 3.0 in.
0.75 in.



### D n



## x z W



## D t


## Y 3.0 in. 

### P A 

### P B 

### B A A



## D t



### D n



## x 2.0 in. 

## AA

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (Method 2.xls) Job Number: 090712 Done By: PB/ Date: 9/7/2012 10:35

### Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Alignment and Tubing Dimensions

D  

### Probe / Pitot Number PRB-607 Level and Perpendicular D 

### No Obstructions No Damage
D  

### qD  

### q 0.0
D 

### qD  

### q 0.0 E 1 

### E  

### qE  

###  q 0.0 E 

### qE  

### q -2.0 E 2 

### J 3.00 T 0.00 A 0.934 

### T z= A tan J(< 0.125") 0.049 w= A tan T(< 0.03125") 0.000 D t

### (0.1875" < D t

### < 0.375") 0.375 P A

### (1.05D t

### < P A

### < 1.5D t

### ) 0.467 

# J P B

### (1.05D t

### < P B

### < 1.5D t

### ) 0.467

P A

### = P B

### ± 0.0625 0.000

Degree indicating level position for determining J then calculating Z. 

### Assembly Inter-Component Spacing Requirements Effective Length (in.) 62.50 W ( t3.0") 6.800 -or- AA ( t2.0") X 0.900 D n 

### 0.460 X / D n

### ( t1.5) 1.957 Y ( t3.0") 3.400 Z t0.75" 1.000 Degree indicating level position for determining D 1 and D2 .

Degree indicating level position for determining T .



### B A



## D t 

### 3.0 in.
0.75 in.



### D n



## x z W



## D t


## Y 3.0 in. 

### P A 

### P B 

### B A A



## D t



### D n



## x 2.0 in. 

## AA

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (Method 2.xls) Job Number: 120805A Done By: PB/ Date: 9/7/2012 11:26

### Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Alignment and Tubing Dimensions

D  

### Probe / Pitot Number PRB-612 Level and Perpendicular D 

### No Obstructions No Damage
D  

### qD  

### q -1.0
D 

### qD  

### q 0.0 E 1 

### E  

### qE  

###  q -2.0 E 

### qE  

### q 0.0 E 2 

### J 1.00 T 1.00 A 0.928 

### T z= A tan J(< 0.125") 0.016 w= A tan T(< 0.03125") 0.016 D t

### (0.1875" < D t

### < 0.375") 0.375 P A

### (1.05D t

### < P A

### < 1.5D t

### ) 0.464 

# J P B

### (1.05D t

### < P B

### < 1.5D t

### ) 0.464

P A

### = P B

### ± 0.0625 0.000

Degree indicating level position for determining J then calculating Z. 

### Assembly Inter-Component Spacing Requirements Effective Length (in.) 62.80 W ( t3.0") 7.000 -or- AA ( t2.0") X 1.000 D n 

### 0.460 X / D n

### ( t1.5) 2.174 Y ( t3.0") 3.100 Z t0.75" 1.300 Degree indicating level position for determining D 1 and D2 .

Degree indicating level position for determining T .



### B A



## D t 

### 3.0 in.
0.75 in.



### D n



## x z W



## D t


## Y 3.0 in. 

### P A 

### P B 

### B A A



## D t



### D n



## x 2.0 in. 

## AA

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (Method 2.xls) Job Number: 120805B Done By: PB/ Date: 9/7/2012 10:42

### Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Alignment and Tubing Dimensions

D  

### Probe / Pitot Number PRB-615 Level and Perpendicular D 

### No Obstructions No Damage
D  

### qD  

### q -1.0
D 

### qD  

### q -1.0 E 1 

### E  

### qE  

###  q -2.0 E 

### qE  

### q 2.0 E 2 

### J 2.00 T 0.00 A 0.908 

### T z= A tan J(< 0.125") 0.032 w= A tan T(< 0.03125") 0.000 D t

### (0.1875" < D t

### < 0.375") 0.375 P A

### (1.05D t

### < P A

### < 1.5D t

### ) 0.454 

# J P B

### (1.05D t

### < P B

### < 1.5D t

### ) 0.454

P A

### = P B

### ± 0.0625 0.000

Degree indicating level position for determining J then calculating Z. 

### Assembly Inter-Component Spacing Requirements Effective Length (in.) 62.70 W ( t3.0") 7.000 -or- AA ( t2.0") X 1.000 D n 

### 0.460 X / D n

### ( t1.5) 2.174 Y ( t3.0") 3.100 Z t0.75" 1.700 Degree indicating level position for determining D 1 and D2 .

Degree indicating level position for determining T .



### B A



## D t 

### 3.0 in.
0.75 in.



### D n



## x z W



## D t


## Y 3.0 in. 

### P A 

### P B 

### B A A



## D t



### D n



## x 2.0 in. 

## AA

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (Method 2.xls) Job Number: 120805B Done By: PB/ Date: 9/7/2012 10:41

### Reference Thermometer I.D. : Temperature Readout I.D.: Umbilical Cord I.D. : Umbilical Cord I.D. : Umbilical Cord I.D. : Probe/Pitot Thermocouple ID

Filter Exit ID Umbilical Adapter ID

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Ref. Thermometer Temp ( o 

### F) Stack Thermocouple Temp ( o 

### F) Meterbox Temp IN ( o 

### F) Meterbox Temp OUT ( o 

### F) Filter Exit Temp (oF) Impinger Exit Temp ( o 

### F)

Thermocouple Simulator Setting

( o 

### F) Stack Temp ( o 

### F) Filter Exit

Temp ( o 

### F) Impinger Exit

Temp ( o 

### F) 

## Method 4 Thermocouple System Audit

Tolerance Ranges 

### Sample Train Thermocouple Audit

Meterbox Thermocouple Audit

Air Compliance Testing Inc. T-THR-010 T-MTB- 006 T-UMC- 106 T-UMC- 303

T-PRB- 615 T-FXT- 023 T-UMA- 016 612

T-FXTT-UMA- 016 T-FXTT-UMA

### 83 84


## 85 84 

## 83 83

80


## 84 81 

## 84

48 98 199 

## 300 401 602 805 1006 1499 

### 48

97 199 

## 300 48

98

082712 PB/SHC 

### 08/27/12

### Reference Thermometer I.D. : Temperature Readout I.D.: Umbilical Cord I.D. : Umbilical Cord I.D. : Umbilical Cord I.D. : Probe/Pitot Thermocouple ID

Filter Exit ID Umbilical Adapter ID

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Ref. Thermometer Temp ( o 

### F) Stack Thermocouple Temp ( o 

### F) Meterbox Temp IN ( o 

### F) Meterbox Temp OUT ( o 

### F) Filter Exit Temp (oF) Impinger Exit Temp ( o 

### F)

Thermocouple Simulator Setting

( o 

### F) Stack Temp ( o 

### F) Filter Exit

Temp ( o 

### F) Impinger Exit

Temp ( o 

### F) 

## Method 4 Thermocouple System Audit

Tolerance Ranges 

### Sample Train Thermocouple Audit

Meterbox Thermocouple Audit

Air Compliance Testing Inc. T-THR-013 T-MTB- 012 T-UMC- 105T-UMCT-PRB- 607T-FXTT-UMA- 030 T-FXTT-UMAT-FXTT-UMA

### 84 85


## 85


## 84

49 98 200 

## 300 398 598 799 999 1500 

### 49

98 200 

## 300 49

98

082712 PB/SHC 

### 08/27/12

## Method 2 Post-Test Thermocouple Check

ALT-011 Post-Test Stack Thermocouple System Check Procedure
Reference Thermometer Serial # 

## 11000622 Reference Thermometer ID 

## T-THR-013 In-Field Temperature Display / Meter Box I.D. 

## MTB-006 Umbilical Cord I.D. 

## UMC-305 Umbilical Cord I.D. 

## UMC-106 Umbilical Cord I.D. Continuity Check Performed
Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4

Probe I.D. 

## PRB-615 PRB-612 PRB-615 Reference Thermometer Ambient Readout (°F) 

## 81.0 81.0 81.0 Stack Temperature Thermocouple Ambient Readout (°F) 

## 80.0 83.0 80.0

Temperature Difference (must be ±2°F) 

## 1.0 -2.0 1.0

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (120805B1-Post-Test Thermocouple Check) 9/20/2012 

### Job Number: 120805B Done By: PB/ Date: 9/7/2012 11:36

## Method 2 Post-Test Thermocouple Check

ALT-011 Post-Test Stack Thermocouple System Check Procedure
Reference Thermometer Serial # 

## 11000062 Reference Thermometer ID 

## T-THR-010 In-Field Temperature Display / Meter Box I.D. 

## MTB-012 Umbilical Cord I.D. 

## UMC-105 Umbilical Cord I.D. Umbilical Cord I.D. Continuity Check Performed
Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4

Probe I.D. 

## PRB-607 Reference Thermometer Ambient Readout (°F) 

## 92.0 Stack Temperature Thermocouple Ambient Readout (°F) 

## 94.0

Temperature Difference (must be ±2°F) 

## -2.0

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (120805A1-Post-Test Thermocouple Check) 9/20/2012 

### Job Number: 120805A Done By: PB/ Date: 9/7/2012 11:33

## Method 4 Meter Box Pre-Test Leak Check Calibration

Remove the front panel from the meter box Disconnect the fan Hook up the proper pump to the meter box Close both the fine and coarse adjustment valves Connect the DH hoses on the front of the meter box Remove the copper elbow from stainless tube at the exit side of gas meter Stopper the stainless tube with a rubber stopper Disconnect the DH static line from the orifice (bottom) Plug in leak check tube into the static side of the orifice Blowing into the leak check tube, pressurize the system to 5-7 inches and clamp off Hold for one minute No leakage should occur. If leak is present, it must be corrected Affix (w/ electrical tape) the copper elbow onto the stainless tube at the exit side of gas meter 

## Reassemble meter box Plug in capped swagelok stem at sample inlet Start pump, bringing system vacuum to at least 15 in. Hg Note DGM reading, start timer Observe DGM for one minute No leakage should occur. If leak is present, it must be corrected Check oil wick position (should be 1/4" above the black O-ring) Check pump oil level (should be at fill line)
Meter Box Number MTB- 006 Pump Number PMP- 006

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (080812-Meter Box Pre-Test Leak Check) 8/13/2012 

### Job Number: 080812 Done By: PB/ Date: 8/8/2012 10:41

## Method 4 Pre-Test Meter Calc Calibration

Meter Box I.D: T - MTB - 006 Standard Meter Meter Box Serial Number: Calibrated By: Apex Instruments Inc. Standard Meter I.D: T - DGM - 006 Calibration Date: February 16, 2012 Temp Sensor I.D: T - THR - DGM MTB-006 Gamma: 0.9977 Barometer I.D: T DPG- 006 Serial Number: 1512377 Meter Box Level? REMOVE CAPS FROM STANDARD METER
Run 1 Pressures Meter Readings Temperatures ' H: 1.00 in.H 2 

### 0 Time Std Meter Meter Box Time Std Meter Meter Box Meter Box Vac: 5.0 in.Hg Begin 0.0 293.425 702.276 (min) In Out In Out P Bar: 28.78 in.Hg End 12.0 299.810 708.710 4 87.0 87.0 88.0 Net 12.0 6.385 6.434 8 87.0 87.0 89.0 (>5.0 dcf) 12 87.0 88.0 89.0 

## Avg. Run 2 Pressures Meter Readings Temperatures ' H: 2.00 in.H 2 

### 0 Time Std Meter Meter Box Time Std Meter Meter Box Meter Box Vac: 5.0 in.Hg Begin 0.0 300.813 709.720 (min) In Out In Out P Bar: 28.78 in.Hg End 12.0 309.647 718.640 4 70.0 70.0 73.0 Net 12.0 8.834 8.920 8 70.0 70.0 74.0 (>5.0 dcf) 12 70.0 71.0 75.0 

## Avg. Run 3 Pressures Meter Readings Temperatures ' H: 3.00 in.H 2 

### 0 Time Std Meter Meter Box Time Std Meter Meter Box Meter Box Vac: 5.0 in.Hg Begin 0.0 310.600 719.596 (min) In Out In Out P Bar: 28.78 in.Hg End 12.0 321.475 730.594 4 70.0 71.0 75.0 Net 12.0 10.875 10.998 8 70.0 71.0 76.0 (>5.0 dcf) 12 70.0 71.0 76.0 

## Avg. ' H: ' H @ 

# J

AVG. * Adjust and recalculate if J does not equal 1.00 ± 0.02 

## 0.9897 2.135 70.17 74.00

70.50 75.67



## 2.149 2.124 0.9902 0.9886 87.17 88.67



## 0.9903 905013



## 1 2 3 2.133

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (080812-Pre-Test Meter Calc) 8/13/2012 

### Job Number: 080812 Done By: PB/ Date: 8/8/2012 10:41

## Method 4 Pre-Test Meter Console Calibration

Run No. Calibration

Meter Correction Factor (Yc) Barometric

Press. (Pb) (in.Hg) Delta H

(in w.g.) Meter Box

Volume (Vd) (cu.ft.) Average

Meter Box Temperature (Tm) (F) Standard

Meter Volume (Vc) (cu.ft.) Standard

Meter Temperature (Tc) (F) Time

(min.) Gamma (Y) Tolerance

(plus or minus 0.02) Delta

H @ 

### Tolerance (plus or minus 0.2) 1 0.9977 28.78 1.000 6.434 88.67 6.385 87.17 12 0.9903 0.000611 2.133 -0.003 2 0.9977 28.78 2.000 8.920 74.00 8.834 70.17 12 0.9902 0.000491 2.149 0.014 3 0.9977 28.78 3.000 10.998 75.67 10.875 70.50 12 0.9886 -0.001102 2.124 -0.012 PASS PASS Average 0.9897 PASS 2.135

Pump Number T-PMP- 006 Meter Box Number T-MTB- 006 Reference Meter Number T-DGM- 006 

## Add Values to 30 Day Calibration History Add Values to Dry Gas Meter Calibration History

Tag Meter Box

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (080812-Pre-Test Meter Console) 8/13/2012 

### Job Number: 080812 Done By: PB/ Date: 8/8/2012 10:41

## Method 4 Pre-Test Meter Calculation Orifice Calibration Data

Remove the front panel from the meter box Disconnect the fan Hook up the proper pump to the meter box Close both the fine and coarse adjustment valves Connect the DH hoses on the front of the meter box Remove the copper elbow from stainless tube at the exit side of gas meter Stopper the stainless tube with a rubber stopper Disconnect the DH static line from the orifice (bottom) Plug in leak check tube into the static side of the orifice Blowing into the leak check tube, pressurize the system to 5-7 inches and clamp off Hold for one minute No leakage should occur. If leak is present, it must be corrected Affix (w/ electrical tape) the copper elbow onto the stainless tube at the exit side of gas meter 

## Reassemble meter box Plug in capped swagelok stem at sample inlet Start pump, bringing system vacuum to at least 15 in. Hg Note DGM reading, start timer Observe DGM for one minute No leakage should occur. If leak is present, it must be corrected Check oil wick position (should be 1/4" above the black O-ring) Check pump oil level (should be at fill line)
Meter Box Number MTB- 012 Pump Number PMP- 009

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (071312-Meter Box Pre-Test Leak Check) 7/17/2012 

### Job Number: 071312 Done By: JL/ Date: 7/13/2012 15:53

## Method 4 Pre-Test Meter Calculation Orifice Calibration Data

Meter Box I.D: T - MTB - 012 Standard Meter Meter Box Serial Number: Calibrated By: Apex Instruments Inc. Standard Meter I.D: T - DGM - 006 Calibration Date: February 16, 2012 Temp Sensor I.D: T - THR - DGM mtb-012 Gamma: 0.9977 Barometer I.D: T DPG- 010 Serial Number: 1512377 Meter Box Level? REMOVE CAPS FROM STANDARD METER
Run 1 Pressures Meter Readings Temperatures ' H: 1.00 in.H 2 

### 0 Time Std Meter Meter Box Time Std Meter Meter Box Meter Box Vac: 5.0 in.Hg Begin 0.0 131.070 626.340 (min) In Out In Out P Bar: 28.52 in.Hg End 12.0 137.898 633.105 4 79.0 78.0 78.0 78.0 Net 12.0 6.828 6.765 8 79.0 78.0 79.0 79.0 (>5.0 dcf) 12 79.0 78.0 80.0 80.0 

## Avg. Run 2 Pressures Meter Readings Temperatures ' H: 2.00 in.H 2 

### 0 Time Std Meter Meter Box Time Std Meter Meter Box Meter Box Vac: 5.0 in.Hg Begin 0.0 138.426 633.635 (min) In Out In Out P Bar: 28.52 in.Hg End 12.0 147.978 643.328 4 79.0 79.0 81.0 81.0 Net 12.0 9.552 9.693 8 79.0 79.0 82.0 82.0 (>5.0 dcf) 12 80.0 79.0 83.0 83.0 

## Avg. Run 3 Pressures Meter Readings Temperatures ' H: 3.00 in.H 2 

### 0 Time Std Meter Meter Box Time Std Meter Meter Box Meter Box Vac: 5.0 in.Hg Begin 0.0 148.683 644.049 (min) In Out In Out P Bar: 28.52 in.Hg End 12.0 160.398 656.046 4 79.0 80.0 83.0 83.0 Net 12.0 11.715 11.997 8 79.0 80.0 84.0 84.0 (>5.0 dcf) 12 79.0 80.0 84.0 84.0 

## Avg. ' H: ' H @ 

# J

AVG. * Adjust and recalculate if J does not equal 1.00 ± 0.02 

## 1 2 3 1.856 78.50 79.00



## 1.0053

0.9876 1.876 79.17 82.00

79.50 83.67



## 1.890 1.882 0.9833

0.9742

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (071312-Pre-Test Meter Calc) 7/17/2012 

### Job Number: 071312 Done By: JL/ Date: 7/13/2012 15:53

## Method 4 Pre-Test Meter Calculation Orifice Calibration Data

Run No. Calibration

Meter Correction Factor (Yc) Barometric

Press. (Pb) (in.Hg) Delta H

(in w.g.) Meter Box

Volume (Vd) (cu.ft.) Average

Meter Box Temperature (Tm) (F) Standard

Meter Volume (Vc) (cu.ft.) Standard

Meter Temperature (Tc) (F) Time

(min.) Gamma (Y) Tolerance

(plus or minus 0.02) Delta

H @ 

### Tolerance (plus or minus 0.2) 1 0.9977 28.52 1.000 6.765 79.00 6.828 78.50 12 1.0053 0.017716 1.856 -0.020 2 0.9977 28.52 2.000 9.693 82.00 9.552 79.17 12 0.9833 -0.004335 1.890 0.015 3 0.9977 28.52 3.000 11.997 83.67 11.715 79.50 12 0.9742 -0.013381 1.882 0.006 PASS PASS Average 0.9876 PASS 1.876

Pump Number T-PMP- 009 Meter Box Number T-MTB- 012 Reference Meter Number T-DGM- 010 

### Add Values to 30 Day Calibration History Add Values to Dry Gas Meter Calibration History

Tag Meter Box

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (071312-Pre-Test Meter Console) 7/17/2012 

### Job Number: 071312 Done By: JL/ Date: 7/13/2012 15:53

## ALT-009 Post-Test Leak Check

NOTE: Do not perform leak check if meter failed ALT-009 requirements. Remove the front panel from the meter box Disconnect the fan Hook up the proper pump to the meter box Close both the fine and coarse adjustment valves Connect the DH hoses on the front of the meter box Remove the copper elbow from stainless tube at the exit side of gas meter Stopper the stainless tube with a rubber stopper Disconnect the DH static line from the orifice (bottom) Plug in leak check tube into the static side of the orifice Blowing into the leak check tube, pressurize the system to 5-7 inches and clamp off Hold for one minute No leakage should occur. Affix (w/ electrical tape) the copper elbow onto the stainless tube at the exit side of gas meter 

## Reassemble meter box
Meter Box Number MTB- 006 Pump Number PMP- 006

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (120805B-ALT-009 Post-Test Leak Check) 9/12/2012 

### Job Number: 120805B Done By: PB/ Date: 9/7/2012 14:06

## ALT-009 Post-Test Leak Check

NOTE: Do not perform leak check if meter failed ALT-009 requirements. Remove the front panel from the meter box Disconnect the fan Hook up the proper pump to the meter box Close both the fine and coarse adjustment valves Connect the DH hoses on the front of the meter box Remove the copper elbow from stainless tube at the exit side of gas meter Stopper the stainless tube with a rubber stopper Disconnect the DH static line from the orifice (bottom) Plug in leak check tube into the static side of the orifice Blowing into the leak check tube, pressurize the system to 5-7 inches and clamp off Hold for one minute No leakage should occur. Affix (w/ electrical tape) the copper elbow onto the stainless tube at the exit side of gas meter 

## Reassemble meter box
Meter Box Number MTB- 012 Pump Number PMP- 012

Air Compliance Testing, Inc. (120805A-ALT-009 Post-Test Leak Check) 9/20/2012 

### Job Number: 120805A Done By: PB/ Date: 9/7/2012 11:31

### Method 4 DGM Calibration History Standard Delta Delta Delta Delta Delta Delta Average Type Date Meter H H@ H H@ H H@ Gamma Delta By Serial # H@ PRE 1/9/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 012 1.00 1.911 2.00 1.941 3.00 1.944 1.0008 1.932 PB POST 1/12/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 012 1.17 1.954 1.17 1.948 1.17 1.945 1.0183 1.949 MC PRE 1/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 009 1.00 1.861 2.00 1.898 3.00 1.876 1.0142 1.878 MC PRE 1/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 002 1.00 1.817 2.00 1.859 3.00 1.831 1.0025 1.836 MC PRE 1/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 014 1.00 1.533 2.00 1.613 3.00 1.616 1.0007 1.587 MC PRE 1/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 015 1.00 2.068 2.00 2.097 3.00 2.117 1.0049 2.094 MC PRE 1/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 003 1.00 1.738 2.00 1.762 3.00 1.825 0.9895 1.775 MC PRE 1/20/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 010 1.00 1.840 2.00 2.034 3.00 1.959 1.0061 1.944 MC PRE 1/20/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 006 1.00 2.051 2.00 2.133 3.00 2.123 0.9974 2.102 MC PRE 2/14/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 001 1.00 1.982 2.00 1.916 3.00 1.864 0.9966 1.921 KL PRE 3/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 014 1.00 1.771 2.00 1.858 3.00 1.820 1.0029 1.817 MC PRE 3/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 012 1.00 1.770 2.00 1.820 3.00 1.797 1.0088 1.796 MC PRE 3/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 009 1.00 1.813 2.00 1.835 3.00 1.732 1.0106 1.793 MC PRE 3/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 010 1.00 1.926 2.00 1.969 3.00 1.871 1.0116 1.922 MC PRE 3/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 006 1.00 1.996 2.00 2.120 3.00 2.085 1.0053 2.067 MC PRE 3/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 015 1.00 2.109 2.00 2.138 3.00 2.115 1.0194 2.121 MC PRE 3/19/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 003 1.00 1.738 2.00 1.762 3.00 1.825 0.9895 1.775 MC PRE 3/20/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 002 1.00 1.837 2.00 1.876 3.00 1.818 1.0063 1.844 MC PRE 3/20/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 003 1.00 1.756 2.00 1.822 3.00 1.814 0.9958 1.797 MC PRE 3/20/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 018 1.00 1.916 2.00 1.915 3.00 1.893 1.0010 1.908 MC PRE 3/20/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 017 1.00 1.869 2.00 1.878 3.00 1.845 0.9939 1.864 MC PRE 3/28/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 009 1.00 1.865 2.00 1.834 3.00 1.807 1.0020 1.836 PB PRE 4/27/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 015 1.00 2.002 2.00 2.187 3.00 2.139 0.9921 2.109 PB POST 5/7/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 014 1.00 1.587 1.00 1.586 1.00 1.582 1.0223 1.585 KL POST 5/7/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 012 1.00 1.915 1.00 1.909 1.00 1.912 1.0370 1.912 KL PRE 5/7/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 014 1.00 1.621 2.00 1.686 3.00 1.648 0.9941 1.652 KL PRE 5/7/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 012 1.00 1.895 2.00 1.942 3.00 1.923 0.9983 1.920 KL PRE 5/11/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 009 1.00 1.886 2.00 1.821 3.00 1.806 1.0190 1.838 JL POST 5/12/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 003 1.50 1.732 1.50 1.695 1.50 1.759 0.9914 1.729 BI PRE 5/17/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 019 1.00 1.940 2.00 1.890 3.00 1.883 1.0122 1.905 PB PRE 6/1/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 010 1.00 1.954 2.00 1.997 3.00 2.010 1.0065 1.978 PB PRE 6/8/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 006 1.00 2.080 2.00 2.158 3.00 2.154 0.9931 2.131 PB PRE 6/12/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 018 1.00 1.912 2.00 1.958 3.00 1.921 1.0056 1.930 MC PRE 6/28/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 003 1.00 1.766 2.00 1.830 3.00 1.811 1.0091 1.802 PB PRE 7/13/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 012 1.00 1.856 2.00 1.890 3.00 1.882 0.9876 1.876 JL PRE 7/13/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 009 1.00 1.930 2.00 1.933 3.00 1.896 1.0048 1.920 JL PRE 7/26/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 014 1.00 1.548 2.00 1.640 3.00 1.669 0.9950 1.619 PB PRE 7/26/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 010 1.00 1.959 2.00 2.028 3.00 1.980 1.0127 1.989 PB PRE 8/8/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 006 1.00 2.133 2.00 2.149 3.00 2.124 0.9897 2.135 PB PRE 8/10/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 019 1.00 1.914 2.00 1.838 3.00 1.857 1.0057 1.870 PB PRE 8/10/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 018 1.00 1.929 2.00 1.909 3.00 1.878 1.0054 1.905 PB PRE 8/10/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 017 1.00 1.883 2.00 1.908 3.00 1.856 0.9956 1.882 PB PRE 8/24/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 003 1.00 1.756 2.00 1.818 3.00 1.796 0.9940 1.790 PB PRE 9/17/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 012 1.00 1.880 2.00 1.945 3.00 1.915 0.9811 1.913 PB PRE 9/18/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 009 1.00 1.903 2.00 1.897 3.00 1.852 0.9858 1.884 PB POST 9/17/2012 1512377 T-MTB- 012 1.50 1.942 1.50 1.940 3.00 1.927 0.9911 1.936 PB Meter Box #

4A - OH - Electronic Calibration HistoryDGM CaliHist

### Digital Pressure Gauge Calibration History (mm Hg) (mm Hg) (mm Hg) (<2mm Hg) (oF) Date Mercury Barometer DPG Difference PASS/FAIL By whom Adjusted? Temp. 10/27/2011 T-DPG- 009 726 727 -1 PASS KL YES 68 10/28/2011 T-DPG- 005 736 736 0 PASS KL NO 66 11/4/2011 T-DPG- 006 736 735 1 PASS MC NO 67 11/4/2011 T-DPG- 007 736 737 -1 PASS MC NO 67 11/4/2011 T-DPG- 008 736 735 1 PASS MC NO 67 11/4/2011 T-DPG- 010 736 736 0 PASS MC NO 67 11/21/2011 T-DPG- 010 736 736 0 PASS KL NO 64 11/21/2011 T-DPG- 005 744 744 0 PASS BI NO 65 12/23/2011 T-DPG- 006 743 743 0 PASS MC NO 60 12/29/2011 T-DPG- 006 726 726 0 PASS KL NO 64 12/29/2011 T-DPG- 005 726 726 0 PASS KL NO 64 1/5/2012 T-DPG- 010 731 731 0 PASS PB NO 66 1/5/2012 T-DPG- 009 731 732 1 PASS PB NO 66 1/9/2012 T-DPG- 005 736 737 1 PASS PB NO 68 2/20/2012 T-DPG- 005 740 740 0 PASS KL NO 66 3/1/2012 T-DPG- 005 728 729 1 PASS MC NO 66 3/1/2012 T-DPG- 006 728 727 -1 PASS MC NO 66 3/21/2012 T-DPG- 010 728 727 -1 PASS MC NO 70 4/3/2012 T-DPG- 010 731 732 PASS PB NO 64.2 4/3/2012 T-DPG- 009 731 731 PASS PB NO 64.2 4/3/2012 T-DPG- 005 731 732 PASS PB N0 64.2 4/6/2012 T-DPG- 006 740 742 2 PASS KL YES 68 4/25/2012 T-DPG- 010 725 726 -1 PASS BI NO 60 5/4/2012 T-DPG- 005 731 730 -1 PASS KL NO 68 5/4/2012 T-DPG- 010 731 730 -1 PASS KL NO 68 5/7/2012 T-DPG- 006 728 728 0 PASS KL NO 68 6/28/2012 T-DPG- 010 723.93 723 0.93 PASS PB NO 90 7/25/2012 T-DPG- 009 729 729 0 PASS PB NO 78 8/8/2012 T-DPG- 005 729 730 1 PASS PB NO 76.2 8/8/2012 T-DPG- 006 729 730 1 PASS PB NO 76.2 8/9/2012 T-DPG- 008 729 730 1 PASS PB NO 77.7 9/4/2012 T-DPG- 008 729 729 0 PASS PB NO 77.5 9/4/2012 T-DPG- 005 729 730 1 PASS PB NO 77.5 9/4/2012 T-DPG- 006 729 729 0 PASS PB NO 77.5 9/7/2012 T-DPG- 005 729 730 1 PASS PB NO 77.2 9/7/2012 T-DPG- 006 729 729 0 PASS PB NO 77.2 9/7/2012 T-DPG- 008 729 729 0 PASS PB NO 77.2 9/7/2012 T-DPG- 009 729 728 -1 PASS PB NO 77.2 9/14/2012 T-DPG- 005 734 734 0 PASS PB NO 75.3 9/14/2012 T-DPG- 006 734 734 0 PASS PB NO 75.3

Digital Pressure Gauge ID#

4A - OH - Electronic Calibration HistoryDPG CaliHist

# Method 5 Acetone Residuals History
VOL RESIDUAL VOL RESIDUAL VOL RESIDUAL DATE (ml) (g/ml) DATE (ml) (g/ml) DATE (ml) (g/ml) 10/09/09 200 0.0000008 11/05/10 200 0.0000000 12/19/11 200 0.0000000 10/12/09 200 0.0000015 11/13/10 200 0.0000000 12/23/11 200 0.0000000 10/14/09 200 0.0000000 11/15/10 200 0.0000000 12/29/11 200 0.0000030 10/14/09 200 0.0000005 11/23/10 200 0.0000000 12/29/11 200 0.0000050 10/20/09 200 0.0000005 11/26/10 200 0.0000005 12/29/11 200 0.0000000 10/20/09 200 0.0000008 12/10/10 200 0.0000000 01/18/12 200 0.0000000 10/26/09 200 0.0000079 12/13/10 200 0.0000000 01/19/12 200 0.0000025 11/04/09 200 0.0000010 12/17/10 200 0.0000018 01/31/12 200 0.0000005 11/30/09 200 0.0000000 01/06/11 200 0.0000003 02/03/12 200 0.0000000 11/30/09 200 0.0000000 01/07/11 200 0.0000075 02/29/12 200 0.0000079 12/02/09 200 0.0000000 01/27/11 200 0.0000018 03/08/12 200 0.0000035 01/04/10 200 0.0000010 01/28/11 200 0.0000000 03/16/12 200 0.0000100 01/05/10 200 0.0000000 01/28/11 200 0.0000010 03/26/12 200 0.0000060 01/11/10 200 0.0000000 01/28/11 200 0.0000020 03/26/12 200 0.0000065 01/15/10 250 0.0000002 02/18/11 200 0.0000000 03/30/12 200 0.0000079 01/20/10 200 0.0000030 02/28/11 200 0.0000000 04/03/12 200 0.0000079 02/02/10 200 0.0000010 03/06/11 200 0.0000013 04/05/12 200 0.0000079 02/11/10 200 0.0000060 03/06/11 200 0.0000008 04/11/12 150 0.0000079 02/11/10 200 0.0000050 03/16/11 200 0.0000008 04/17/12 200 0.0000079 02/12/10 200 0.0000000 03/23/11 200 0.0000000 04/27/12 100 0.0000079 02/17/10 220 0.0000016 04/01/11 200 0.0000079 04/28/12 100 0.0000000 03/02/10 200 0.0000027 04/01/11 200 0.0000048 05/01/12 200 0.0000079 03/02/10 200 0.0000000 04/08/11 200 0.0000000 05/02/12 200 0.0000079 03/29/10 300 0.0000012 04/22/11 200 0.0000015 05/04/12 200 0.0000079 04/16/10 200 0.0000070 04/23/11 200 0.0000058 05/05/12 200 0.0000023 04/16/10 200 0.0000005 04/24/11 200 0.0000000 05/13/12 200 0.0000000 04/16/10 200 0.0000000 04/29/11 200 0.0000010 05/20/12 100 0.0000790 04/20/10 200 0.0000013 05/08/11 200 0.0000005 05/24/12 100 0.0000270 04/22/10 200 0.0000018 05/15/11 200 0.0000068 06/08/12 200 0.0000040 05/12/10 200 0.0000018 05/20/11 200 0.0000005 06/14/12 200 0.0000079 05/24/10 200 0.0000070 05/21/11 200 0.0000010 07/02/12 200 0.0000079 05/24/10 200 0.0000079 06/04/11 200 0.0000079 07/05/12 200 0.0000079 05/25/10 100 0.0000079 06/06/11 200 0.0000043 07/20/12 200 0.0000048 06/04/10 100 0.0000050 06/10/11 200 0.0000005 07/20/12 200 0.0000050 06/16/10 200 0.0000025 06/24/11 200 0.0000079 07/21/12 200 0.0000050 06/29/10 200 0.0000033 07/07/11 200 0.0000079 08/01/12 200 0.0000079 07/29/10 200 0.0000018 07/16/11 200 0.0000079 08/09/12 100 0.0000060 07/29/10 200 0.0000033 08/08/11 200 0.0000045 08/09/12 200 0.0000000 08/11/10 200 0.0000010 08/09/11 200 0.0000020 08/10/12 200 0.0000000 08/12/10 200 0.0000079 08/24/11 200 0.0000079 08/17/12 400 0.0000018 08/20/10 200 0.0000043 09/12/11 200 0.0000005 08/24/12 150 0.0000013 08/21/10 200 0.0000079 09/26/11 200 0.0000018 08/26/12 200 0.0000060 08/31/10 200 0.0000079 09/28/11 200 0.0000020 09/04/12 200 0.0000045 08/31/10 200 0.0000010 09/29/11 200 0.0000005 09/04/12 200 0.0000079 09/01/10 200 0.0000079 09/29/11 200 0.0000015 09/01/10 200 0.0000063 09/26/11 200 0.0000000 09/12/10 200 0.0000065 10/05/11 200 0.0000030 09/21/10 200 0.0000079 10/05/11 200 0.0000028 09/22/10 200 0.0000079 10/05/11 200 0.0000025 10/01/10 200 0.0000079 10/22/11 200 0.0000015 10/06/10 200 0.0000000 10/26/11 200 0.0000038 10/14/10 200 0.0000015 10/26/11 200 0.0000013 10/14/10 200 0.0000015 11/07/11 100 0.0000000 10/15/10 200 0.0000053 11/21/11 200 0.0000005 10/22/10 200 0.0000000 11/21/11 200 0.0000000 10/24/10 200 0.0000025 11/23/11 200 0.0000015 10/29/10 200 0.0000000 12/14/11 200 0.0000000 11/02/10 200 0.0000000 12/18/11 200 0.0000000

### Air Compliance Testing, Inc. 

## Filter Specifications

### Astronomical Applications Dept.

U.S. Naval Observatory Washington, DC 20392-5420 YORK, PENNSYLVANIA o , o , W 76 44, N39 58 Altitude and Azimuth of the Sun Aug 30, 2012 Eastern Standard Time Altitude Azimuth (E of N) h m o o 04:40 -10.6 68.9 04:50 -8.8 70.7 05:00 -7.0 72.3 05:10 -5.2 74.0 05:20 -3.3 75.7 05:30 -1.4 77.3 05:40 0.9 78.9 05:50 2.6 80.5 06:00 4.4 82.1 06:10 6.2 83.7 06:20 8.1 85.3 06:30 10.0 86.8 06:40 11.9 88.4 06:50 13.8 90.0 07:00 15.7 91.7 07:10 17.6 93.3 07:20 19.5 94.9 07:30 21.4 96.6 07:40 23.3 98.3 07:50 25.2 100.1 08:00 27.1 101.9 08:10 29.0 103.7 08:20 30.8 105.6 08:30 32.6 107.5 08:40 34.5 109.5 08:50 36.2 111.6 09:00 38.0 113.8 09:10 39.7 116.1 09:20 41.4 118.4 09:30 43.1 120.9 09:40 44.7 123.5 09:50 46.3 126.2 10:00 47.8 129.1 10:10 49.3 132.1 10:20 50.7 135.3 10:30 52.0 138.6 10:40 53.2 142.2 10:50 54.3 145.9 11:00 55.3 149.8 11:10 56.2 153.9 11:20 57.0 158.1 11:30 57.6 162.6 11:40 58.1 167.1 

## Page 1 of 2 Altitude/Azimuth Table for One Day

9/20/2012 http://aa.usno.navy.mil/cgi

- bin/aa_altazw.pl

### 11:50 58.5 171.8

12:00 58.7 176.5 12:10 58.7 181.3 12:20 58.6 186.0 12:30 58.3 190.7 12:40 57.9 195.3 12:50 57.3 199.8 13:00 56.6 204.1 13:10 55.7 208.3 13:20 54.8 212.3 13:30 53.7 216.1 13:40 52.5 219.7 13:50 51.2 223.1 14:00 49.9 226.4 14:10 48.5 229.5 14:20 47.0 232.4 14:30 45.4 235.2 14:40 43.8 237.8 14:50 42.2 240.4 15:00 40.5 242.8 15:10 38.8 245.1 15:20 37.0 247.3 15:30 35.2 249.4 15:40 33.4 251.4 15:50 31.6 253.4 16:00 29.7 255.3 16:10 27.9 257.2 16:20 26.0 259.0 16:30 24.1 260.7 16:40 22.2 262.5 16:50 20.3 264.2 17:00 18.4 265.8 17:10 16.5 267.5 17:20 14.6 269.1 17:30 12.7 270.7 17:40 10.8 272.3 17:50 8.9 273.9 18:00 7.0 275.4 18:10 5.1 277.0 18:20 3.3 278.6 18:30 1.5 280.2 18:40 -0.1 281.8 18:50 -2.6 283.4 19:00 -4.4 285.1 19:10 -6.3 286.7 19:20 -8.1 288.4 19:30 -9.9 290.1 19:40 -11.7 291.8


## Back to form Page 2of 2 Altitude/Azimuth Table for One Day

9/20/2012 http://aa.usno.navy.mil/cgi

- bin/aa_altazw.pl

# Copyrighted page(s) removed. Copyrighted material is not available in Regulations.gov since it may not be reproduced without consent of the copyright holder. Removed pages can be viewed at the USEPA Docket Center, Public Reading Room.
Address: 1301 Constitution Ave, NW Room 3334 Washington, DC 20004 Telephone: 202-566-1744 Email: docket-customerservice@epa.govPO Box 41156 • Cleveland OH 44141 800-EPA-AIR1 • 440-230-1100


## July 16, 2012 Mr. Rick Millard Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection 909 Elmerton Avenue Harrisburg, PA 17110 Subject: Glen-Gery Corporation – York, PA

(Title V Permit 67-05045 – Spring Garden Township, York County) Pretest Procedural Protocol for August 30, 2012 Kiln Test Event Dear Mr. Millard: Enclosed please find a copy of this Pretest Procedural Protocol completed by Air Compliance Testing, Inc. for the Glen-Gery Corporation. Facility located in York, PA. Please note that the following entries address the specific sections as found in the PA DEP Source Testing Manual (Revision 8). A date of August 30, 2012 has been selected as the test day. Run No.1’s start time is targeted for 8:00 am. If this test’s start time changes, Air Compliance Testing or facility personnel will contact you in advance to notify you of the new starting time. 2.1.1.1 Glen-Gery Corporation 1090 E. Boundary Avenue York, PA 17403 Attn: Mr. Mike Krzyzanowski Environmental Manager Phone: 610-562-3076 2.1.1.2 Air Compliance Testing, Inc. Mr. Sin Hoi Chiew Project Manger PO Box 41156 Cleveland, OH 44141-0156 (800) 372-2471

### PA DEP - Northwest District Office

Page 2 July 17, 2012 

## 2.1.1.3 The laboratory analysis required for EPA Method 5 will be completed by Air Compliance Testing, Inc. and the analysis for EPA Method 26A will be performed by Maxxam Analytics Inc. located in Coopersburg, PA. 2.1.1.4 A process description is as follows: The Glen-Gery York facility operates two natural gas-fired tunnel kilns. The kilns produce brick of various sizes and colors. Kiln 2 (Unit ID 102) is fitted with a dry limestone absorber (DLA) system to control hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). The DLA system is comprised of a limestone cascade absorber equipped with a limestone silo located atop the DLA. Exhaust gases from the kiln pass through the absorber. The absorber is equipped with a peeling drum that mechanically removes the reacted layer from the crushed limestone. The “peeled” limestone is pneumatically conveyed from the peeling drum back to the limestone feed bin, located on top of the absorber. The reacted layer that has been peeled from the limestone is discharged via gravity to a hopper for disposal. A block diagram depicting the kiln and DLA arrangements is attached. 2.1.1.5

Tunnel Kiln EPA Methods 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , and 26A sampling location

Green Brick from Dryers

Natural Gas

Fired Brick Cascade Adsorber LS Feed Silo

Peeling Drum Extraction Screw DLA

Bypass Damper Closed

Reacted LS to Covered Bins EPA Methods 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , and 26 A sampling location Limestone From Trucks



## 2.1.1.6 NA 2.1.1.7 Title V Permit 67-05045 – Spring Garden Township, York County 2.1.1.8 The purpose of the testing is to satisfy the requirements of Source ID 102, Section D.II.009.

### PA DEP - Northwest District Office

Page 3 July 17, 2012


## 2.1.1.9 To the best of our knowledge, this Pretest Procedural Protocol contains all the testing requirements specified in applicable state and federal regulations, operating permits and plan approvals. 2.1.1.10 During this test kiln 2 will be operated the fastest process rate possible for the product manufactured. 2.1.1.11 Process data will be collected using the plant's internal record keeping program. 2.1.1.12 The table below summarizes the pollutants, sampling methodology, and any method variations that will be utilized during this compliance test event.
Emission Unit Pollutant(s) to

be Tested EPA Test Method(s) Total Time for Test Runs Number of

Sampling Runs Kiln No. 2 Total Front-half

Particulate Matter (PM) 5 (currently

promulgated versions) 90 – 120 minutes 3

Kiln No. 2 Hydrochloric

Acid and Hydrofluoric Acid 26A (currently

promulgated versions) 90 – 120 minutes 3



## 2.1.1.13 Please see the appendix of this test plan for the sample train schematics that will be utilized during this test event. 2.1.1.14

Kiln No. 2 Inlet Duct Traverse Point Schematic

### PA DEP - Northwest District Office

Page 4 July 17, 2012

120.0" 2.53 Equivalent Diameters Upstream from Disturbance

47.5" x 47.0" I.D. Elliptical Stack (2) 4.0" I.D. Sampling Ports Located 90°Apart

660.0" 13.89 Equivalent Diameters Downstream from Disturbance 47.5" I.D.

2.5" Port 1 4 3 1 6 5 2

Port 2

1 2

3

4

5 6 2.5"47.0" I.D.

Point
1 2 3 4 5 6 Distance From Inside Wall (in.) Port 1 2.1 6.9 14.1 33.4 40.6 45.4 % of Duct Depth
4.4 14.6 29.6 70.4 85.4 95.6 2.1 6.9 13.9 33.1 40.1 44.9 Distance From Inside Wall (in.) Port 2



## Kiln No. 2 Exhaust Stack Traverse Point Schematic

2.1.1.15 EPA Method 5 - The PM mass, which includes any material that condenses at or above the filtration temperature, is determined gravimetrically after removal of uncombined water. EPA Method 26A

- Analysis will be performed within two weeks after their collection utilizing an ion chromatograph with a conductivity detector for chlorine and fluorine ion separation and quantization. 2.1.1.16 All of the calculations performed during this compliance test event will follow the most currently promulgated EPA Method calculation algorithms. 2.1.1.17 See attached examples of the field data sheets that will be utilized during this test event.

### PA DEP - Northwest District Office

Page 5 July 17, 2012 

## Thank you again for your careful consideration, and I am looking forward to working with you on this upcoming compliance testing project. Sincerely,

Mr. Tyson E. Houchin Operations Director Air Compliance Testing, Inc. cc: Mr. Mike Krzyzanowski- Glen-Gery Corporation