# C_2012194EN.01000901.xml

| 30.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/9

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg (Austria) lodged on 30 March 2012 — Freistaat Bayern v GREP GmbH

(Case C-156/12)

2012/C 194/14

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landesgericht Salzburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Freistaat Bayern

Applicant:

Defendant: GREP GmbH

Defendant:

Third Party: Revisor beim Landesgericht Salzburg

Third Party:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the first sentence of Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to be interpreted as meaning that proceedings for a declaration of enforceability of judgments given in a Member State pursuant to Article 38 et seq. of Council Regulation No 44/2001 (1) also fall within the scope of the Charter? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the first sentence of Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to be interpreted as meaning that proceedings for a declaration of enforceability of judgments given in a Member State pursuant to Article 38 et seq. of Council Regulation No 44/2001 (1) also fall within the scope of the Charter?

1

| 2.a) | If so, does the principle of effective judicial protection enshrined in Article 47 of the Charter cover a claim for exemption from the payment of court costs, in particular a fixed fee payable on lodging an appeal, and/or fees for the assistance of a lawyer in proceedings of the kind referred to in question 1? |
| --- | --- |

2.a)

If so, does the principle of effective judicial protection enshrined in Article 47 of the Charter cover a claim for exemption from the payment of court costs, in particular a fixed fee payable on lodging an appeal, and/or fees for the assistance of a lawyer in proceedings of the kind referred to in question 1?

| 2.b) | Does this apply also to enforcement proceedings to be conducted in accordance with national law or, at least, to simultaneous appeal proceedings concerning consent to enforcement if the court has given a decision on the application for a declaration of enforceability and consent to enforcement together in one order? |
| --- | --- |

2.b)

Does this apply also to enforcement proceedings to be conducted in accordance with national law or, at least, to simultaneous appeal proceedings concerning consent to enforcement if the court has given a decision on the application for a declaration of enforceability and consent to enforcement together in one order?

| 3. | Does a right to legal aid in the above sense arise at least in the alternative from Article 43(1) of Regulation No 44/2001 and/or Article 6(1) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms where national law requires a party to be represented before the court by a lawyer for the lodging of the appeal in question? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Does a right to legal aid in the above sense arise at least in the alternative from Article 43(1) of Regulation No 44/2001 and/or Article 6(1) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms where national law requires a party to be represented before the court by a lawyer for the lodging of the appeal in question?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, OJ L 12, p. 1.

1

---