alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans' Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Veterans' Disability Benefits Commission has scheduled a meeting for June 7-8, 2007, at the Washington Plaza Hotel, 10 Thomas Circle, NW.,  Washington, DC. The meeting sessions will begin at 8 a.m. and end between 5-5:30 p.m. each day. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Commission is to carry out a study of the benefits under the  laws of the United States that are provided to compensate and assist veterans and their survivors for disabilities and deaths attributable to military service. 

                    The agenda for the meeting will feature updates on the progress of the studies being conducted by the Center for Naval Analyses (CNA) and the Institute of Medicine (IOM). There will be additional discussions with CNA on topics of ongoing research and analyses. The IOM Committees on Presumptions and Medical Evaluation of Veterans for Disability are expected to provide an overview of each Committee's final report and discuss their findings with the Commission. The Commission will receive presentations on several draft                           ( print page 29043)                        Issue Papers in various stages of development, discuss priorities for future meetings and sections of the Commissions final report.                 

                    Interested persons may attend and present oral statements to the Commission on June 8. Oral presentations will be limited to five minutes or less, depending on the number of participants. Interested parties may also provide written statements for review by the Commission prior to the meeting or at any time, by e-mail to                     *veterans@vetscommission.com*                     or by mail to Mr. Ray Wilburn, Executive Director, Veterans' Disability Benefits Commission, 1101 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20004.                 

Dated: May 17, 2007. 

By Direction of the Secretary. 

E. Philip Riggin, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 07-2558  Filed 5-22-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8320-07-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Interlink Electronics, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, E. Michael Thoben, III, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|                                               
|/s/ E. MICHAEL THOBEN, III                     
|E. Michael Thoben, III                         
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|April 10, 2007
#### WALTER LE ROY CAMP, Jr., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. ATLANTIC CITY RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT.

Submitted January term, 1929

Decided May 7, 1929.

Before Justices Black, Campbell and Case.

Eor the rule, *Thompson & Ilanstein.*

*Contra, Bolts & Tripician.*

Per Curiast.

In an action for damages for negligence the plaintiffs have verdicts as follows: Camp, Jr., $1,000, and Camp, Sr., $500, which the defendant seeks to set aside upon the grounds that they are against the weight of the evidence and becáuse the plaintiff Camp, Jr., was guilty of contributory negligence.

We conclude that neither of these grounds is supported by the proofs and the rule to show cause will therefore be discharged, with costs.
#### § 550.504 Witness fees.

In proceedings under this subpart, witnesses are, unless otherwise prohibited by law, entitled to the same fees and mileage as in the courts of the United States, subject to funds being provided by appropriations Acts.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2431 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2431

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend and increase the 
   deduction for certain expenses of elementary and secondary school 
                               teachers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2009

  Ms. Kosmas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend and increase the 
   deduction for certain expenses of elementary and secondary school 
                               teachers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``America's Teachers Tax Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION FOR CERTAIN EXPENSES OF ELEMENTARY AND 
              SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS.

    (a) Extension.--Subparagraph (D) of section 62(a)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``or 2009'' and 
inserting ``2009, or 2010''.
    (b) Increase.--Subparagraph (D) of section 62(a)(2) of such Code is 
amended by striking ``$250'' and inserting ``$500''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
§ 502.703 Applicant or licensee response. Upon receiving the materials described in § 502.702(b), the administrative law judge will issue a notice advising the applicant or licensee of the right to respond in support of an OTI application or continuation of a current OTI license. The response must be: ( a ) Filed with the administrative law judge within 30 days of the administrative law judge's notice; and
( b ) Include any supporting information or documents, such as affidavits of fact, memoranda, or written argument. [Rule 703.]
§ 502.403 General authority. ( a ) The Commission intends to consider using a dispute resolution proceeding for the resolution of an issue in controversy, if the parties agree to a dispute resolution proceeding.
( b ) The Commission will consider not using a dispute resolution proceeding if— ( 1 ) A definitive or authoritative resolution of the matter is required for precedential value, and such a proceeding is not likely to be accepted generally as an authoritative precedent;
( 2 ) The matter involves or may bear upon significant questions of Government policy that require additional procedures before a final resolution may be made, and such a proceeding would not likely serve to develop a recommended policy for the agency;
( 3 ) Maintaining established policies is of special importance, so that variations among individual decisions are not increased and such a proceeding would not likely reach consistent results among individual decisions;
( 4 ) The matter significantly affects persons or organizations who are not parties to the proceeding;
( 5 ) A full public record of the proceeding is important, and a dispute resolution proceeding cannot provide such a record; and
( 6 ) The Commission must maintain continuing jurisdiction over the matter with authority to alter the disposition of the matter in the light of changed circumstances, and a dispute resolution proceeding would interfere with the Commission's fulfilling that requirement.
( c ) Alternative means of dispute resolution authorized under this subpart are voluntary procedures which supplement rather than limit other available agency dispute resolution techniques.
#### § 143.115 Definitions.

The definitions provided in § 136.110 of this subchapter apply to this part. In addition, the following definition applies exclusively to this part:

*Independent* means the equipment is arranged to perform its required function regardless of the state of operation, or failure, of other equipment.
<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statement (Form
S-8, Nos.  33-48833,  333-33497)  pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan, 1996
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and 1996 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan
of our report dated February 9, 1998,  with respect to the financial  statements
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.

Our audits also included the financial  statement schedule of FemRx, Inc. listed
in item 14(a)2. This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion,
the financial  statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation
to the  basic  financial  statements  taken as a whole,  presents  fairly in all
material respects the information set forth therein.



                                                           ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Palo Alto, California
March 25, 1998
#### § 32.20-10 Flame arresters—TB/ALL.

Flame arresters must be of a type and size suitable for the purpose intended and meet ASTM F 1273 (incorporated by reference, see § 32.01-1).

[CGD 88-032, 56 FR 35821, July 29, 1991, as amended by USCG-2000-7790, 65 FR 58459, Sept. 29, 2000]
**Exhibit 10.2**

 

**INTERLINK ELECTRONICS, INC.**

**INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT**

**1996 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN**

 

This INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT is made between INTERLINK ELECTRONICS,INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and                                 (the “Optionee”), pursuant to theCompany’s 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Plan”). The Company and the Optionee agree as follows: 

 

1. Option Grant: The Company hereby grants to the Optionee on the terms and conditions of this Agreement the right and the option (the“Option”) to purchase all or any of                                 (                ) of the Company’s Common Stock (the “Grant Shares”) at a purchase price of$                 per share. The terms and conditions applicable to grants of options of the Company’s Common Stock, as set forth in the Plan, areincorporated into and made part of this Agreement. The Option is intended to be an Incentive Stock Option, as defined in Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; if however, it fully or partially fails for whatever reason toqualify, then under those circumstances, and to that extent, it shall be treated as a Non-Statutory Stock Option. 

 

2. Time of Exercise of Option: The grant date of this Option is                                ,         (the “Grant Date”). Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein and until the Option expires or is terminated as provided in the Plan, this Option may be exercised from timeto time to purchase the Grant Shares as follows: 

 

The Option shall become exercisable for 1/36th of the Grant Shares at the end of each one-month period, sothat the Option will be fully exercisable on the third anniversary of the Grant Date. 

 

3. Expiration: The Option shall continue in effect until the earlier of the date ten years after the Grant Date, or the date thirty days after the Optionee’s service with the Company terminates (other thanby reason of death or disability), unless earlier terminated as provided in the Plan.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending November 25, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for First Quarter of 2007 (January 1, 2007 - March 31, 2007)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6879

RAHIM E. H. MUHAMMAD X, a/k/a Rahim X,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

F. TAYLOR; LIEUTENANT BOYERS; SERGEANT SMILEY;

SERGEANT CONNORS; SERGEANT SANTIAGO; DOCTOR

LIGHTNER; DOCTOR WONG; D. SWISHER; R. W. BYRD;

C. AILSTOCK; L. SAUNDERS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.

(CA-95-1296-R)

Submitted: September 24, 1996 Decided: October 9, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rahim E.H. Muhammad X, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Mark

Dudley Obenshain, WHARTON, ALDHIZER & WEAVER, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Rahim E. H. Muhammad X appeals from the district court's order

continuing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) action for ninety days and

ordering him to exhaust inmate grievance procedures. We dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here

appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory

or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2337 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to make grants for certain 

transportation feasibility studies for southern New Mexico and west Texas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2009 

Mr. TEAGUE (for himself and Mr. REYES) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to make grants 

for certain transportation feasibility studies for southern 

New Mexico and west Texas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Southwestern Transit 

5 Corridor Planning and Fuel Use Reduction Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RAIL RUNNER EXTENSION FEASIBILITY STUDY. 

7 The Secretary of Transportation shall make a grant 

8 to the New Mexico Mid Region Council of Governments 

9 to conduct, working in cooperation with the appropriate 

10 municipalities, metropolitan planning organizations, and 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2337 IH

1 rural planning organizations in New Mexico and Texas, 

2 a transportation corridor feasibility study to evaluate and 

3 provide recommendations regarding the costs, benefits, ob4 stacles, impacts and feasibility of various transit tech5 nology, alignments, and funding options for extending the 

6 New Mexico rail runner express commuter rail service 

7 south from Belen, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, or to 

8 intermediate points. 

9 SEC. 3. LAS CRUCES AND EL PASO FEASIBILITY STUDY. 

10 The Secretary of Transportation shall make a grant 

11 to the city of Las Cruces, New Mexico, and the city of 

12 El Paso, Texas, to conduct, in cooperation with the Las 

13 Cruces metropolitan planning organization and the El 

14 Paso metropolitan planning organization, a transportation 

15 corridor feasibility study to evaluate and provide rec16 ommendations regarding the costs, benefits, obstacles, im17 pacts, and feasibility of various transit technology, align18 ments, and funding options for a public transit system, 

19 including the option of commuter rail, that would connect 

20 Las Cruces and El Paso. 

21 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

22 There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as 

23 may be necessary to carry out this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
§ 32.60-35 Tank vessels carrying Grade A liquid cargo—TB/ALL. ( a ) Grade A liquids having a Reid vapor pressure in excess of 25 pounds per square inch shall be transported in cargo tanks which are independent of the hull.
( b ) Barges carrying Grade A liquids having a Reid vapor pressure in excess of 25 pounds per square inch shall be of a Type III barge hull as defined in § 32.63-5(b)(3).
[CGFR 70-10, 35 FR 3709, Feb. 25, 1970]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ALEXANDER WILLIAMS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 694 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of January, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to 

On January 23, 1995, by Executive Order 12947, the President declared a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States constituted by grave acts of violence committed by foreign terrorists who threaten to disrupt the Middle East peace process. On August 20, 1998, by Executive Order 13099, the President modified the Annex to Executive Order 12947 to identify four additional persons, including Usama bin Laden, who threaten to disrupt the Middle East peace process. 

Because these terrorist activities continue to threaten the Middle East peace process and to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, the national emergency declared on January 23, 1995, as expanded on August 20, 1998, and the measures adopted on those dates to deal with that emergency must continue in effect beyond January 23, 2007. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to foreign terrorists who threaten to disrupt the Middle East peace process. 

                    This notice shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and transmitted to the Congress.                

[FR Doc. 07-267

Billing code 3195-01-P
#### John Clare, *Appellant, v.*The Brooklyn City Railroad Company, *Respondents*.

Order refusing extra allowance reversed, and allowance of $500 made.
§ 56.15-5 Fluid-conditioner fittings. ( a ) Fluid-conditioner fittings meeting the standards of this part and certified in accordance with subpart 50.25 of this subchapter are acceptable for use in piping systems.
( b ) Fluid-conditioner fittings made in accordance with the applicable standards listed in table 2 to § 56.60-1 and of materials complying with subpart 56.60 of this part, may be used within the material, size, fluid, pressure, and temperature limitations of those standards and within any further limitations specified in this subchapter.
( c ) The maximum allowable working pressure may be determined in accordance with § 56.15-1(c).
( d ) If nonstandard fluid-conditioner fittings are welded, they must be welded in accordance with subpart 56.70 of this part and part 57 of this subchapter or by other processes specifically approved by the Marine Safety Center.
( e ) Heat exchangers having headers and tubes, and brazed boiler steam air heaters, are not considered fluid-conditioner fittings and must meet the requirements in part 54 of this subchapter regardless of size. For brazed boiler steam air heaters, see also § 56.30-30(b)(1)t.
[CGD 77-140, 54 FR 40602, Oct. 2, 1989, as amended by CGD 83-043, 60 FR 24772, May 10, 1995; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65176, Oct. 31, 2008]
§ 42.13-45 Verification of marks. ( a ) The International Load Line Certificate (1966) shall not be delivered to the vessel until § 42.07-5 has been fully complied with under the authority and provisions of subparts 42.07 and 42.09 of this part.
[CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10060, July 12, 1968, as amended by CGFR 68-126, 34 FR 9014, June 5, 1969]