alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1








Dynex Capital, Inc.


List of Consolidated Entities


As of December 31, 2010











Mortgage Investment Corporation


Investment Capital Access, Inc.


Commercial Capital Access One, Inc.


MERIT Securities Corporation


Financial Asset Securitization, Inc.


GLS Capital Services, Inc.


GLS Development, Inc.


SMFC Funding Corporation


MSC I L.P.


Issued Holdings Capital Corporation


GLS Capital, Inc.


GLS Properties, LLC


Allegheny Commercial Properties I, LLC


Allegheny Income Properties I, LLC


Allegheny Special Properties, LLC














NOTE:
All companies were incorporated in Virginia except for GLS Properties, LLC, Allegheny Commercial Properties I, LLC, Allegheny Income Properties I, LLC, and Allegheny Special Properties, LLC, which were incorporated in Pennsylvania.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>6
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION 
EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM 10-K AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED 
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        YEAR
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>          25,000,786
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>         42,779,444
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                     11,347
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>              274,980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 43,065,771
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>       5,235,533
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>             5,235,533
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                         0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>       20,051,580
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>             400,000
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>             400,000
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>               0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>       17,778,658
<NET-ASSETS>                   37,830,238
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                 129,612
<OTHER-INCOME>                      1,167
<EXPENSES-NET>                 (2,237,064)
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>        (2,106,285)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>       (2,467,963)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>       4,114,995
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>            (459,253)
<EQUALIZATION>                          0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                   0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>             0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>           (459,253)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>              0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>             429,523
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                347,334
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                 2,330,729
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>           38,059,865
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  55
<PER-SHARE-NII>                        (9)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0 <F1>
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                    46
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                      5.88
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>          3,216,913
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>                    8
<FN>
<F1>
A zero value is used since the change in net unrealized fair value is 
not allocated to General Partners and Limited Partners as it is not 
taxable.  Only taxable gains or losses are allocated in accordance 
with the Partnership Agreement.
</FN>

</TABLE>
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 0890 Directorate ID : 2011 - SW - 019 - AD Helicopter Model: MD Helicopters, Inc. (MDHI) Model 369D, 369E, 369F, and 369FF Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 109 Hel icopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to detect a short - edge margin condition , to modify the tailboom by

adding a longeron doubler over the area with the short - edge distance, and to prevent failure of the tailboom and sub sequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 19 for a doubler Labor per Helicopter (4 x $ 8 5 /work- hour to take measurements ) (8 x $85/work - hour to install a doubler) $ 340 $680 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 340 to take measurements $699 to install a doubler Total US Fleet Cost $ 37,060 to take measurements Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Is th e AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : John Cecil
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001009162
<NAME> FNB BANCSHARES, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,007,433
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,430,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,501,331
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,506,203
<LOANS>                                     14,168,832
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (152,614)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,920,308
<DEPOSITS>                                  13,559,868
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            154,014
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,163
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,703,018
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              19,920,308
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                886,790
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               70,974
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               290,093
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,247,857
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             371,868
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             395,524
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          852,333
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  138,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,072,095
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (257,146)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    (257,146)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (185,145)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.30)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.24
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,993
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                20,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,386
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              152,614
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           152,614
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Chief 

Air Division, Alabama Department of 

Environmental Management 

P. 0. Box 301463 

Montgomery, Alabama 36130-1463 

Dear Mr. Gore: 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Air, Pesticides, and Toxics Management Division conducted an end-of-year evaluation of the Perfonnance Partnership Grant's associated fiscal 

year (FY) 2013 section 1 OS commitments in the Air Planning Agreement (APA). This letter documents 

the conclusion of the joint evaluation process required by 40 CFR § 35.115. 

All of the FY 2013 AP A commitments are considered complete with the exception of one work plan activity related to regional haze. Based on the EPA's preliminary review, the regional haze progress 

report that Alabama provided on June 26, 2013, was not submitted as a revision to the state 

implementation plan as required by 40 CFR § S 1.308(g). The EPA will contact Alabama in the near 

future to discuss the State's position regarding the nature of this submission and the path forward should 

the EPA conclude that the State has not met its obligations under the regional haze program. 

Region 4 appreciates the progress made in FY 20 13 and we look forward to continuing our joint efforts 

to protect and improve air quality with you and your staff on these issues. rr you have any questions regarding your grant, please contact Stuart Perry at (404) 562-8980 or Lynorae Benjamin (404) 562- 9040. 

Sincerely, 

~~~~ 

Chief 

Air T oxics and Monitoring Branch 

Air, Pesticides, and Toxics 

Management Division 

lnlamul Addrass (URL) • hllp://www.epa.gov 

Rec:vc:led/Reeya•bl• • rrlnled wlh Vegelable 01 Bas.d Inks on Recycled Paper !Minimum 30% Poscc:onsumll)
§ 502.603 Assessment of civil penalties: Procedure; criteria for determining amount; limitations; relation to compromise. ( a ) *Procedure for assessment of penalty.* The Commission may assess a civil penalty or, in addition to or in lieu of a civil penalty, a refund of a charge, only after notice and opportunity for hearing. Civil penalty assessment proceedings, including settlement negotiations, shall be governed by the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure in this part. All settlements must be approved by the Presiding Officer. The full text of any settlement must be included in the final order of the Commission.
( b ) *Determination of amount* — ( 1 ) *Factors for consideration.* In determining the amount of a civil penalty assessed pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, the Federal Maritime Commission shall take into consideration: ( i ) The nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation committed;
( ii ) With respect to the violator: ( A ) The degree of culpability;
( B ) Any history of prior offenses;
( C ) The ability to pay; and
( D ) Such other matters as justice may require; and
( iii ) The amount of any refund of money ordered under 46 U.S.C. 41310.
( 2 ) *Commensurate reduction in civil penalty* — ( i ) *In general.* In any case in which the Federal Maritime Commission orders a refund of money in addition to assessing a civil penalty, the amount of the civil penalty assessed shall be decreased by any additional amounts included in the refund of money in excess of the actual injury (as defined in 46 U.S.C. 41305(a)).
( ii ) *Treatment of refunds.* A refund of money ordered shall be: ( A ) Considered to be compensation paid to the applicable claimant; and
( B ) Deducted from the total amount of damages awarded to that claimant in a civil action against the violator relating to the applicable violation.
( c ) *Limitations; relation to compromise.* When the Commission, in its discretion, determines that policy, justice or other circumstances warrant, a civil penalty assessment proceeding may be instituted at any time for any violation which occurred within five years prior to the issuance of the order of investigation. Such proceeding may also be instituted at any time after the initiation of informal compromise procedures, except where a compromise agreement for the same violations under the compromise procedures has become effective under § 502.604). [Rule 603.]
[49 FR 44418, Nov. 6, 1984. Redesignated at 58 FR 27211, May 7, 1993, as amended at 64 FR 7812, Feb. 17, 1999; 84 FR 54040, Oct. 9, 2019; 88 FR 16574, Mar. 20, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MUTUAL RISK
MANAGEMENT LTD.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000826918
<NAME> MUTUAL RISK MANAGEMENT LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           333,990
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 333,990
<CASH>                                         119,611
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             380,766
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          25,151
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,763,378
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                456,224
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            118,219
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           44,070
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                124,267
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,952
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           382
<OTHER-SE>                                     217,186
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,763,378
<PREMIUMS>                                      17,952
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              6,046
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               (774)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  26,159
<BENEFITS>                                       7,663
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     10,605
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            17,913
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,202
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,276
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,926
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,884
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
----

**EqualEducational Opportunity for Hispanic Students in the Oklahoma City Public Schools**

----

**Chapter****4**

**Service Agency Perspective**

----

Communityservice agencies, by nature of their mission statements, come in contact withstudents who need ancillary services to improve their quality of life. Both RuthB. Mazaheri and Wayne Thompson have provided significant program activities forstudents enrolled in the Oklahoma City public schools.

Ms.Mazaheri, the director of programs for the Latino Community Development Agency,with 17 years of service in community mental health, spoke to the AdvisoryCommittee about local educational issues.[1]The first issue she discussed was the Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS). Ms.Mazaheri explained that the purpose of the test is to assess where the studentsare academically. She suggested to the Committee that in some Oklahoma Cityschools, the ITBS has become the measure for how well the school is doing.[2]Ms. Mazaheri gave the example of the Columbus Elementary School, which at thetime was a candidate for an enterprise school.[3]An enterprise school is allowed to introduce educational innovations withlimited supervision by the school district. However, it was the contention ofMs. Mazaheri that Columbus Elementary was a school that exempted a large numberof Hispanic students from taking the ITBS.[4]She used information from the school district�s Management InformationServices to show that in 1997, 650 students were enrolled at Columbus; 439, or67 percent, of the students were of Hispanic origin, and 398 of these Hispanicstudents were eligible to take the Iowa Test.[5]However, only 139 of these 398 Hispanic students took the ITBS.[6]The school district exempted 214, or 49 percent, of Hispanic students fromtaking the test.[7] Ms. Mazaheri said theschool continues this practice of test-taking exemptions. She emphasized thatthe Columbus Elementary has been represented as one of the leaders with highscores in the Iowa Test but that the reality of the numbers suggests that theColumbus Elementary School�s high performance in the Iowa Test is related tothe high number of exemptions.[8]She stated that students exempted from taking the test pay the price of notbeing properly assessed to achieve their academic potential.[9]

Ms.Mazaheri noted the inconsistency within the school district�s elementaryschools. Some schools exempt a large number of Hispanic students from taking theITBS while others exempt a small number of Hispanics and choose to accept thechallenge of teaching all students.[10]

[1]    Ruth B. Mazaheri, Statement before the Oklahoma Advisory Committee to the    U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, community forum, Oklahoma City, Sept. 29,    1998, Transcript, p. 224 (hereafter cited as Transcript).

[2]    Ibid.

[3]    Ibid.

[4]    Ibid.

[5]    Ibid., p. 225.

[6]    Ibid.

[7]    Ibid.

[8]    Ibid., pp. 225�26.

[9]    Ibid., p. 226.

[10]    Ibid., p. 227.
§ 44.01-20 New and existing vessels; special service. ( a ) A new vessel marked with load lines for special service on a coastwise or inter-island voyage is a vessel whose keel was laid on or after September 28, 1937. An existing vessel is one whose keel was laid before that date.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 12 (Friday, January 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2527-2528]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-220]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting

Time and Date: 8:30 a.m. (EST), January 22, 2007.

[[Page 2528]]


Place: 4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: Closed to the public.

Matters to be Considered: Personnel.

Contact Person for More Information: Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, 
Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

    Dated: January 16, 2007.
Thomas K. Emswiler,
Secretary to the Board, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 07-220 Filed 1-16-07; 4:42 pm]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending March 29, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    US DOLLARS
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,758
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,796
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,628
<PP&E>                                           1,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,577
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,489
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,694
<OTHER-SE>                                         216
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,577
<SALES>                                         22,095
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,095
<CGS>                                           13,954
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,253
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   359
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 127
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    402
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                402
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       402
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>