alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### COLLINGSWOOD COAL AND LUMBER COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM S. FOX, RESPONDENT.

Submitted January 26, 1929

Decided July 25, 1929.

Before Justices Trenchard, Kalisch and Lloyd.

*675For the appellant, *Philip Wendkos.*

For the respondent, *A. Moullon McNutt.*

Pee Cukiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Camden District Court in favor of defendant, entered upon the verdict of a jury.

The plaintiff landlord sued to recover rent alleged to be due from defendant, tenant, and also for a charge for heating the premises.

The controversy at the trial seemed to turn upon the question whether or not the notice of intention to vacate was reasonably given by defendant. If that question was in tended to be raised on this appeal the appellant apparently failed to carry out that intention. As we read the only specification of cause for reversal it presents no ruling of the court in the trial of the case, or in the charge of the court, or refusal to charge, to which exception or objection was taken.

The specification is as follows:

“Upon the facts represented the District Court should have found as a matter of law that (a) there was no testimony that the defendant, William S. Fox, serve notice upon the plaintiff or its president, Henry L. Bialy, of his intention to vacate in accordance with the statute in such case made and provided; (b) there was no testimony or evidence to show that defendant had given plaintiff one month’s notice in writing of his intention to vacate the demised premises.”

There was apparently a verbal request to charge which the court refused and allowed an exception. Counsel for plaintiff1 was allowed also the privilege of taking any exception he saw fit to the charge, but these are not made the subject-matter of specifications of causes for appeal.

The judgment will be1 affirmed, with costs.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending July 19, 2008

|Filer                   | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                             | End of Comment Period                                  
|----------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|BRYN MAWR TRUST COMPANY | Premises       | Bryn Mawr Trust Company, Bryn Mawr, PA requesting approval to increase its investment in bank premises by $1,300,000 which will exceed the 150% threshold investment in their bank premises | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:              | Not applicable
|Federal Register:       | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending October 25, 2008

|Filer                        | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                   | End of Comment Period                             
|---------------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|LAKESIDE HOLDING CORPORATION | * 3A1         | Lakeside Holding Corporation, to become a bank holding company through the acquisition of 100 percent of the voting shares of Lakeside State Bank, both in Oologah, Oklahoma.                                                     | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:11/20/2008
|Newspaper:                   | Not available
|Federal Register:            | 11/20/2008   
|LINDOE, INC.                 | * 3A3         | Lindoe, Inc., Ordway, Colorado, to acquire 51 percent of the voting shares of Southern Colorado National Bancorporation, Inc., Pueblo, Colorado and thereby indirectly acquire Southern Colorado National Bank, Pueblo, Colorado. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:11/06/2008
|Newspaper:                   | Not available
|Federal Register:            | 11/06/2008   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location           | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|-------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|FARMERS ST BK, WALLACE, NEBRASKA | 727156 | 07/07/2008 | 10/02/2008     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND FROM THE
INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,887
<SECURITIES>                                    16,099
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,289
<ALLOWANCES>                                       596
<INVENTORY>                                     13,988
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,509
<PP&E>                                          34,098
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,753
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,106
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           177
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,690
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,982
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,210
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,670
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,269
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   596
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,012
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,270
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (975)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,245
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,245
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.71
        

</TABLE>
§ 44.01-1 Establishment of load lines for special services. ( a ) Load lines are established for steam colliers, tugs, barges, and self-propelled barges engaged in special services in conformity with regulations in this part.
( b ) Load lines for steam colliers, barges, and self-propelled barges engaged on specially limited coastwise voyages as described in § 44.01-12 shall be established pursuant to the regulations in this part.
( c ) Variance for tugs is not permitted.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16755, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by USCG-1998-4442, 63 FR 52190, Sept. 30, 1998]
```

[House Report 107-56]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                     107-56

======================================================================

 
 WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT TO THE 
  SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES 
                               COMMITTEE

                                _______
                                

 May 4 (legislative day, May 3), 2001.--Referred to the House Calendar 
                       and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

     Mr. Goss, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 131]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 131, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                summary of provisions of the resolution

    The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a 
two-thirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is 
reported from the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions 
reported from the Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver 
to any special rule reported on the legislative day of May 8, 
2001, providing for consideration or disposition of any 
conference report to accompany the concurrent resolution (H. 
Con. Res. 83) establishing the congressional budget for the 
United States Government for fiscal year 2002.

                                

```
<PAGE>   1




                   ABLE TELCOM HOLDING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


Exhibit 21 -     List of Subsidiaries as of October 31, 1995

The following is a listing of all subsidiaries of Able Telcom Holding Corp. as 
of October 31, 1995:

-    Transportation Safety Contractors, Inc.
-    Transportation Safety Contractors, of Virginia, Inc.
-    TIPCO, Inc.
-    Siema Telecommunications, Ltda. (A Brazilian Company)
-    Able Communications Services, Inc. (formerly BCD Communications, Inc.)
-    Able Telecom/TTI C.A.
Exhibit 10.2


 


2004 INCENTIVE
COMPENSATION PLAN


PERFORMANCE
TARGETS


 


Intent:  To provide a reward for achieving budget targets.


 


Measurement
Criteria:  The incentive award for each executive under the
2004 incentive compensation plan was derived from three measurement criteria: 1) MarkWest
Hydrocarbon, Inc. (“MarkWest Hydrocarbon”) operating
cash flow (weighted 40% of the total incentive award); 2) MarkWest
Energy Partner’s, L.P. (“MarkWest Energy”)
distributable cash flow (weighted 40% of the total incentive award); and 3)
department/individual goals (weighted 20% of the total incentive award).


 


Threshold:  The payout of incentive awards was contingent
upon EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation, depletion and amortization) being 90% to 100% of target for both MarkWest Energy and MarkWest
Hydrocarbon.


 


Incentive Award Range:  The incentive award range was set from 20% to
35% of base salary for officers and executives if budget targets are achieved,
with opportunity of percentages to be increased to up to 35% to 65% of base
salary for achieving stretch performance.


 


Payout:  Base incentive award 50% cash and 50% equity
(restricted stock or phantom units).
§ 45.123 Freeing port area: Changes for bulwark height. ( a ) For the purposes of freeing port area only, bulwark height is considered standard at 24 in for ships 240 ft in length and less; and 48 in for ships 480 ft in length or greater. The standard bulwark height for ships of intermediate length is obtained by direct interpolation.
( b ) If the bulwark is more than standard height, the area required by § 45.117 must be increased by 0.04 square feet per foot (ft2/ft) of length of well for each foot difference in height.
( c ) For ships greater than 480 ft in length that have an average bulwark height less than 3 ft, the area required by § 45.117 may be decreased by 0.04 ft2/ft of length for each foot difference in height.
§ 503.63 Request for information. ( a ) Upon request, in person or by mail, made in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (b) or (c) of this section, any individual shall be informed whether or not any Commission system of records contains a record pertaining to him or her.
( b ) Any individual requesting such information in person shall personally appear at the Office of the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, NW, Washington, DC 20573 and shall: ( 1 ) Provide information sufficient, in the opinion of the Secretary, to identify the record, e.g., the individual's own name, date of birth, place of birth, etc.;
( 2 ) Provide identification acceptable to the Secretary to verify the individual's identity, e.g., driver's license, employee identification card or medicare card;
( 3 ) Complete and sign the appropriate form provided by the Secretary.
( c ) Any individual requesting such information by mail shall address such request to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, NW, Washington, DC 20573 and shall include in such request the following: ( 1 ) Information sufficient in the opinion of the Secretary to identify the record, e.g., the individual's own name, date of birth, place of birth, etc.;
( 2 ) A signed notarized statement to verify his or her identity.
[49 FR 44401, Nov. 6, 1984; 49 FR 47395, Dec. 4, 1984, as amended at 63 FR 50535, Sept. 22, 1998]
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 22, 2024

NO. 03-24-00046-CR

Jason Lee Sackett, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA AND KELLY

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay 

costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
EXHIBIT 21

<TABLE>
<S>                     <C>                   <C>                   <C>                  <C>
                                              --------------------
                                                  ABLE TELCOM
                                                 HOLDING CORP.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       NETWORK                NETWORK           TRANSPORTATION         CONSTRUCTION        COMMUNICATIONS
       SERVICES             DEVELOPMENT            SERVICES                                  DEVELOPMENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Adesta            Adesta ICP, Inc.          Adesta           Georgia Electric        Able Telcom
 Communications, Inc.                           Transportation,          Company         International, Inc.
       formerly                                  Inc. formerly
     MFS Network                              MFS Transportation
  Technologies, Inc.                             Systems, Inc.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                TransTech, Inc.     Patton Management      Able Telcom CA
                                                   formerly               Corp.
                                              MFS TransTech, Inc.
                                              ---------------------------------------------------------------
                                               Southern Aluminum      Transportation       Able Telcom Do
                                                 & Steel Corp.     Safety Contractors,      Brasil, LTDA
                                                                           Inc.
                                              ---------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Specialty               Able          Able Wireless, Inc.
                                                  Electronic        Telecommunications
                                                 Systems, Inc.        & Power, Inc.
                                              ---------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
1

The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-3471/01-3960

___________

James A. Willis, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeals from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Patricia L. Brune, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: March 18, 2002

 Filed: March 21, 2002 

___________

Before LOKEN, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, James Willis appeals from the district court’s1

orders denying his petition for a writ of mandamus and assessing a filing fee. Having

reviewed the record, we conclude the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the

petition, see Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 403 (1976), and properly

assessed the filing fee in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1430

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to provide emergency financial

assistance to agricultural producers who suffer severe crop losses in

federally designated disaster areas.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 6, 1995

Mr. FARR (for himself, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. POMBO, Ms.

ESHOO, Mr. HERGER, Mr. FAZIO of California, Mrs. SEASTRAND, Mr.

BROWN of California, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. ROSE, Mr. DOOLEY, and

Mr. CALVERT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to provide emergency financial assistance to agricultural producers who

suffer severe crop losses in federally designated disaster

areas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOR AGRICULTURAL

4 PRODUCERS IN DISASTER AREAS.

5 (a) ASSISTANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of

6 Agriculture may provide emergency financial assistance to

7 agricultural producers for crop and operating losses in-
2

•HR 1430 IH

1 curred as a result of damages to, or the destruction of,

2 an agricultural commodity that—

3 (1) is grown in an area designated as the site

4 of a major disaster under the Robert T. Stafford

5 Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42

6 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.);

7 (2) is normally produced by the producer, but

8 was damaged, destroyed, or prevented from being

9 planted because of the natural disaster that was the

10 basis for the designation or because of conditions di11 rectly related to the natural disaster; and

12 (3) is not an agricultural commodity that was

13 eligible for crop insurance coverage under the Fed14 eral Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) be15 fore the natural disaster.

16 (b) USE OF EXISTING AUTHORITIES.—The Secretary

17 shall use existing authorities available to the Secretary to

18 provide assistance under subsection (a). In using such au19 thorities, the Secretary may waive any provision of law

20 that otherwise prevents an agricultural producer described

21 in subsection (a) from receiving assistance, except that the

22 Secretary may not waive crop loss requirements that con23 dition the receipt of crop insurance or disaster assistance.

24 (c) PREVENTION OF DUPLICATION.—An agricultural

25 producer may not receive assistance under subsection (a)
3

•HR 1430 IH

1 if the producer is compensated for the same loss under

2 any other provision of law.

3 (d) EFFECT ON EXISTING AUTHORITIES.—The re4 ceipt by an agricultural producer of assistance under sub5 section (a) shall not be construed to make the agricultural

6 producer eligible for any other Federal assistance pro7 gram.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.5

                                November 15, 2004

Mr. Morris H. Wheeler
Chief Executive Officer
Cohesant Technologies Inc.
5845 West 82nd Street
Indianapolis, IN 46278

Dear Morris:

      This letter confirms that, pursuant to action of the Board of Directors on
November 14, 2004, your Base Salary (as defined in the Employment and
Confidentiality Agreement Dated December 1, 2001) was increased to $175,000 per
annum, effective December 1, 2004.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            /s/ Dwight D. Goodman
                                            -------------------------
                                            Dwight D. Goodman,
                                            Chairman of the Board of Directors

Acknowledged this 15 day of November, 2004.

/s/ Morris H. Wheeler
---------------------
Morris H. Wheeler