alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
18 TOXICOLOGY OF THE EYE

the eye is less dependent 

### upon the character 

### of the cation than 

### upon theconcentration 

### ofthe

### alkali, the

### duration of the exposure, and the 

### pH of the solution. 

### Earlier experimental studies by Friedenwald, Hughes, and 

### Herrmann had established that, 

### in the case 

### ofa

### solution containing sodium as the 

### principal cation, when the 

### alkalinity was increased above 

### pH 11.5 the severity of 

### injury to the corneal stroma increased sharply.b Subsequent tests

### ofnumerous other alkalies on 

### rabbitcorneasfrom 

### which the corneal 

### epithelium had been removed established a general rule, 

### applicable to cations 

### which are not 

### injurious at neutrality, that solutions 

### havingalkalinity as 

### high as 

### pH 11 cause only 

### slight and re versible 

### injury to thecorneal stroma on 

### brief (10 minute) exposure.28 Furthermore, these tests established that at 

### pH 12 and higher under thesame conditions, severe 

### injury ofthecornea 

### with opacification can be induced by 

### all alkalies.28 

### Thus injuriousness to the stroma of the

cornea increases greatly between 

### pH 11 and 

### pH 12, probably most steeply at

### pH 11.5. 

### Certain cations cause greater immediate opacifica 

### tionofthestroma than doothers, 

### buttheultimate degreeofdamage is governed solely by the 

### hydroxyl ion concentration. 

### When thecorneal 

### epithelium is present, 

### conditions are more com plex, and greater differences 

### in the character 

### ofinjury of the eye by different alkalies are notable even at equal 

### pH. Variations in manner and rate 

### of penetration through the 

### epithelial barrier account 

### for certain differences recognizable 

### clinically in burns by calcium 

### hydrox ide, sodium hydroxide, and ammonium hydroxide. 

### For instance, 

### in patients calcium hydroxide mostcommonly causes superficial opacifica 

### tion of the cornea, whereas sodium 

### hydroxide commonly induces pearly opacification 

### of deeper layers 

### of the stroma, and ammonium 

### hydroxidetends to cause the deepest 

### injury, with edemaand 

### wrinkling of the posterior surface of the cornea, also 

### iritis and even cataract. These 

### clinical differences are 

### in part explicable by differences 

### in rate of penetration 

### which have been demonstrated experimentally 

### in animal eyes, enucleated eyes, and 

### in excised corneas.25 Measurements comparing solutions 

### of similar concentration and 

### alkalinity have shown that therates

### ofpenetration through excised beefcorneas

### with epithelium present can be graded from slowest to fastest 

### in the

### follow ing order: calcium hydroxide, tetraethylammonium hydroxide, bari

um hydroxide, strontium hydroxide, 

### lithium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide, and ammonium hydroxide. Removal of
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.98

                             Supplemental Agreement

This Supplemental Agreement (this "Supplemental Agreement") is entered into as
of December 1, 2004 in Beijing between the following parties:

Party A: Beijing Cool Young Information Technology Co., Ltd. Address: Room 9E,
No. 3 Apartment, Hua'ao Center, No. 31 Zizhuyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing

Party B: Hurray! Times Communications (Beijing) Ltd. Address: No. B07, Floor B,
Tong Heng Plaza, No. 4 Huayuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing

        WHEREAS:

Party A and Party B signed the Domain Name Assignment Agreement and Domain Name
License Agreement (the "Agreements") in Beijing on May 5, 2005. Party A and
Party B intend to make the following amendments to the Agreements.

        NOW, THEREFORE, through mutual negotiations, the parties hereto agree as
follows:

1.      Amendment

        The domain name "hawa.cn" listed in Appendix 1 to the Agreements shall
be deleted. As the transfer and license in connection with the domain name
"hawa.cn" that are described in the Agreements have not been actually effected,
they shall be deemed never to have been occurred.

2.      Effectiveness

        This Supplemental Agreement shall be executed and become effective as of
the date first written above. It is executed in Chinese in two original
counterparts and each of them shall have equal legal effect.

        IN WITNESS THEREOF the parties hereto have caused this Supplemental
Agreement to be duly executed on their behalf by a duly authorized
representative as of the date first set forth above.

<PAGE>

(No text in this page)

Party A: Beijing Cool Young Information Technology Co., Ltd. (Company seal
affixed) Authorized Representative: (Signed)

Party B: Hurray! Times Communications (Beijing) Ltd. (Company seal affixed)
Authorized Representative: (Signed)
Submitted on motion to dismiss appeal September 3,

dismissed September 10, 1918.

#### MORRISON *v.*ST. JOHNS SANITARIUM.

(174 Pac. 721.)

Appeal and Error — Undertaking—-Failure to Serve.

1. Where appellants regularly served their notice of appeal and filed their undertaking, but failed to serve undertaking on respondent or her attorney, and offered no escuse for such failure, the appeal will be dismissed.

Prom Clatsop: Jambs A. Eakin, Judge.

On motion to dismiss appeal.

Dismissed.

*Mr. Edward E. Gray,*for the motion.

*Mr. John M. Stevenson, Mr. George Estes*and *Messrs. G. G. & A. C. Fulton, contra.*

PEE CUEIAM. —

1. The plaintiff had a decree in her favor in the court below and the defendants regularly served their notice of appeal and filed their undertaking, hut failed to serve the undertaking on plaintiff or her counsel. Plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal and affirm the decree of the court below. As no excuse is offered for the failure to serve the undertaking the appeal will be dismissed and the decree affirmed with judgment against appellants for the costs of this proceeding. Appeal Dismissed,
Amendment No.1 to the Employment Agreement


 Exhibit 10.5 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 to the Employment Agreement dated as of October     , 2003 (the
“Agreement”) by and between HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC., a Maryland corporation (“HCPI”), and CHARLES A. ELCAN (the “Executive”). 
  
 A. HCPI and Executive desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein; and 
  
 B. Except as set forth herein, the parties intend the Agreement to continue
in effect in accordance with its current terms. 
  
 NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 
  
 1. Section 3(b) of the Agreement is hereby deleted and the following
substituted therefor: 
  
 (b) Annual Incentive Plan Bonus.
Effective for all years beginning after December 31, 2004, the Executive shall be eligible to receive an annual bonus in the amount, and on such terms and conditions, as are determined by the Compensation Committee of HCPI in its sole and absolute
discretion. HCPI shall pay the Executive an annual bonus of $475,000 for 2004, which the Executive acknowledges and agrees discharges in full any and all of HCPI’s obligations under Section 3(b)(ii) of the Agreement as in effect immediately
prior to this Amendment No. 1. Any bonus payable under this Section 3(b) shall be paid within 2.5 months of the end of the calendar year during which such bonus is earned. The Executive acknowledges that these modifications to Section 3(b) shall not
be considered to be a breach of this Agreement or to constitute “Good Reason” under the Agreement. 
  
 2. Section 3(e)(i) is hereby amended by deleting “(but HCPI shall separately pay and deductible or co-payment amounts)” therefrom. 

 
 3. A new Section 5(f) is hereby added as follows: 
  
 (f) Section 409A. To the extent Executive would be subject to the
additional 20% tax imposed on certain deferred compensation arrangements pursuant to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), as a result of any provision of this Agreement, such provision shall be deemed
amended to the minimum extent necessary to avoid application of such tax and the parties shall execute any amendment reasonably necessary to implement this Section 5(f). Whether or not any amendment is executed by the parties, Executive agrees that
any modification required by this Section 5(f) shall not be considered to be a breach of this Agreement or to constitute “Good Reason” under this Agreement. 






 4. Except as otherwise provided herein, the Agreement continues in full force and effect in accordance
with its current terms. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto
have executed this Amendment No. 1 as of this 2nd day of February, 2005. 
  

			
	 HEALTH CARE PROPERTY INVESTORS, INC.

		
	 By
	 	 /s/ Edward J. Henning


	 Its
	 	 Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

	
	 EXECUTIVE

	
	 /s/ Charles A. Elcan


	 Charles A. Elcan
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS



I, Melvin Wyman,, Chief Executive Officer and Sole Director of Pop N Go, Inc., certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Pop N Go, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;



c)

disclosed in this report any changes in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 22, 2006

/s/ Melvin Wyman

Melvin Wyman

Chief Executive Officer and Sole Director
# C_2012098EN.01001702.xml

| 31.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/17

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia (Badajoz, Spain) lodged on 23 January 2012 — Soledad Duarte Hueros v Autociba S.A., Automóviles Citroen España S.A.

(Case C-32/12)

2012/C 98/28

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia, Badajoz

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Soledad Duarte Hueros

Applicant:

Defendant: Autociba S.A., Automóviles Citroen-2 España S.A.

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

If a consumer, after failing to have the product brought into conformity — because, despite repeated requests, repair has not been carried out — seeks in legal proceedings only rescission of the contract, and such rescission is not available because the lack of conformity is minor, may the court of its own motion grant the consumer an appropriate price reduction?

---
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending June 2, 2007

|Filer                                                 | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------------------------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|COMMERCIAL AND SAVINGS BANK OF MILLERSBURG, OHIO, THE | * Branch       | Notice by The Commercial & Savings Bank, Millersburg, OH of its intent to establish a branch at 91 North Clay Street, Millersburg, OH. | Newspaper:06/07/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                                            | 06/07/2007    
|Federal Register:                                     | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.015-1 Applicable specifications and standards. ( a ) *Specifications.* The following specification and standard, of the issue in effect on the date the plastic foam material is manufactured, form a part of this subpart: ( 1 ) Military specification: MIL-F-859—Fuel Oil, Boiler.
( 2 ) Federal specification: C-C-91—Candle illuminating.
( 3 ) Federal standard: Standard 601—Rubber: Sampling and Testing.
( 4 ) ASTM D4986-98, Standard Test Method for Horizontal Burning Characteristics of Cellular Polymeric Materials.
( b ) *Copies on file.* Copies of the specifications and standards referred to in this section shall be kept on file by the plastic foam manufacturer with this subpart. ( 1 ) The Federal Specification and the Federal Standard may be purchased from the General Services Administration, Federal Acquisition Service, Office of the FAS Commissioner, 2200 Crystal Drive, 11th Floor, Arlington, VA 22202; telephone 703-605-5400.
( 2 ) The Military Specification may be obtained from the Military Specifications and Standards, Standardization Documents Order Desk, Building 4D, 700 Robbins Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094, *https://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/ .*
( 3 ) The A.S.T.M. Standard may be purchased from the American Society for Testing Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.
[CGFR 65-37, 30 FR 11593, Sept. 10, 1965, as amended by CGFR 65-64, 31 FR 563, Jan. 18, 1966; USCG-1999-5151, 64 FR 67186, Dec. 1, 1999; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60162, Sept. 30, 2013]
# C_2015065EN.01002901.xml

| 23.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2015 — Veloss International and Attimedia v Parliament

(Case T-667/11) (1)

1

((Public service contracts - Supply of Greek translation services for the Parliament - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Obligation to state reasons - Non-contractual liability))

(2015/C 065/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Veloss International (Brussels, Belgium) and Attimedia SA (Brussels) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: P. López-Carceller, L. Darie and P. Biström, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application, first, for the annulment of the decision of the European Parliament to select, in second place, the tender submitted by the applicants in response to the call for tenders No EL/2011/EU ‘Translation into Greek’ (OJ 2011, S 56-090374), communicated to the applicants by letter of 18 October 2011, and all related decisions taken by the Parliament, and second, for damages for the loss allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 18 October 2011 to select, in second position, the tender submitted by Veloss International SA and Attimedia SA in call for tenders EL/2011/EU for the provision of Greek translation services; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Parliament of 18 October 2011 to select, in second position, the tender submitted by Veloss International SA and Attimedia SA in call for tenders EL/2011/EU for the provision of Greek translation services;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Parliament to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 58, 25.2.2012.

1

---
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter
Ended March 31, 2010 (the "Report") by American Medical Alert Corp.
("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
  and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Registrant.


Date: May 17, 2010
                    
                    
                    /s/
      Richard RalloRichard
      RalloChief
      Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to American Medical Alert Corp. and will be retained by American
Medical Alert Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### § 32.50-1 Cargo pumps for tank vessels constructed on or after November 10, 1936—TB/ALL.

On all tank vessels, the construction or conversion of which is started on or after November 10, 1936, the cargo pumps shall be designed and installed to minimize the danger of sparking. Special care shall be exercised in the design of packing spaces in order to secure ample depth and accessibility of glands. Where cargo pump shafts pierce gastight bulkheads, stuffing boxes with readily accessible gastight glands shall be provided.
EMCORE Fundamental Terms of Executive Severance Policy









Exhibit 10.1

 


FUNDAMENTAL TERMS OF EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE POLICY*

 



The fundamental terms adopted by the Compensation Committee provide that executives of EMCORE will receive the following severance compensation in return for a written release of any claims they may have against EMCORE:

 

Executive Vice Presidents:  Continuation of base salary for a period equal to (a) one year, plus (b) two weeks of base salary, plus (c) two additional weeks of base salary for each year the executive was employed by EMCORE (the “Severance Period”).  Continuation of health and medical benefits for the entire Severance Period, up to a maximum of 18 months.

 

Vice Presidents:  Continuation of base salary for a period equal to (a) five months, plus (b) two weeks of base salary, plus (c) two additional weeks of base salary for each year the executive was employed by EMCORE (the “Severance Period”).  Continuation of health and medical benefits for the entire Severance Period, up to a maximum of 18 months.







* These terms will be incorporated into a complete written severance plan to be adopted by the Compensation Committee in the near future.
§ 525.2 Terminal schedules. ( a ) *Marine terminal operator schedules.* A marine terminal operator, at its discretion, may make available to the public, subject to section 10(d) of the Act (46 U.S.C. 41102(c), 41103, 41106), a schedule of its rates, regulations, and practices. ( 1 ) *Limitations of liability.* Any limitations of liability for cargo loss or damage pertaining to receiving, delivering, handling, or storing property at the marine terminal contained in a terminal schedule must be consistent with domestic law and international conventions and agreements adopted by the United States; such terminal schedules cannot contain provisions that exculpate or relieve marine terminal operators from liability for their own negligence, or that impose upon others the obligation to indemnify or hold-harmless the terminals from liability for their own negligence.
( 2 ) *Enforcement of terminal schedules.* Any schedule that is made available to the public by the marine terminal operator shall be enforceable by an appropriate court as an implied contract between the marine terminal operator and the party receiving the services rendered by the marine terminal operator, without proof that such party has actual knowledge of the provisions of the applicable terminal schedule.
( 3 ) *Contracts for terminal services.* If the marine terminal operator has an actual contract with a party covering the services rendered by the marine terminal operator to that party, an existing terminal schedule covering those same services shall not be enforceable as an implied contract.
( b ) *Cargo types not subject to this part.* ( 1 ) Except as set forth in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, this part does not apply to bulk cargo, forest products, recycled metal scrap, new assembled motor vehicles, waste paper and paper waste in terminal schedules.
( 2 ) Marine terminal operators which voluntarily make available terminal schedules covering any of the commodities identified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section thereby subject their services with respect to those commodities to the requirements of this part.
( c ) *Marine terminal operator agreements.* The regulations relating to agreements to which a marine terminal operator is a party are located at part 535 of this chapter.
[64 FR 9283, Feb. 25, 1999, as amended at 74 FR 50723, Oct. 1, 2009]