alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013225EN.01005101.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/51

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 May 2013 — TME SpA — Termomeccanica Ecologia v European Commission

(Case C-418/12 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Public service contracts - Call for tenders in relation to the rehabilitation of the Bucharest wastewater treatment plant, jointly financed by the ISPA structural funds - Allegedly unlawful decision of the Romanian authorities to reject the tender submitted by the appellant - Refusal of the Commission to open an infringement or financial adjustment procedure against Romania)

2013/C 225/90

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: TME SpA — Termomeccanica Ecologia (represented by: C. Malinconico and A. Gigliola, avvocati)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Aresu and P. van Nuffel, agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 4 July 2012 in Case T-329/11 TME v European Commission, by which that court dismissed as manifestly inadmissible, first, an application for annulment of the Commission’s letter of 20 April 2011 concerning the complaint lodged by TME in connection with the failure on the part of Romania to fulfil its obligations under European Union law in the context of the project ‘Bucharest Wastewater Treatment Plant Rehabilitation: Stage I ISPA 2004/RO/16/P/PE/003-03’, linked to the restructuring of the Bucharest wastewater treatment plant, and, second, a claim for damages — Misinterpretation of the subject of the action — Practical Guide to Contract Procedures for External Actions — Commission under an obligation to issue a reasoned opinion in the event of irregularities or breaches arising in the course of the tendering procedure

TME

European Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | TME SpA — Termomeccanica Ecologia is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

TME SpA — Termomeccanica Ecologia is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 373, 1.12.2012.

1

---
EXHIBIT 23.1



               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-3254,  333-3468 and 333-22089) pertaining to the Stock Option
Agreements,  the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan and the 1996 Non-Employee Directors'
Stock Option Plan of Arterial  Vascular  Engineering,  Inc., of our report dated
July 25, 1997,  except as to the first  paragraph of Note 5 as to which the date
is August 21, 1997, with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements and
schedule of Arterial Vascular  Engineering,  Inc., included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 1997.


                                                           ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Palo Alto, California
September 10, 1997
EXHIBIT 99.20

CONSENT OF EXPERT

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the Form 40-F) of Cameco Corporation (the Corporation) to be
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

I hereby consent to reference to my name and my involvement in the preparation of, or supervision of the preparation of, scientific and
technical information in the following instances:



| | (a) | under the headings Operations and Development Projects  Uranium Operating Properties  McArthur River/Key Lake, Mineral Reserves and Resources  and Governance  Interest of
Experts in the Corporations Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2013 dated February 27, 2014 for the McArthur River/Key Lake properties; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | under the headings Our Operations and Projects  Uranium Operating Properties  McArthur River/Key Lake and Mineral Reserves and Resources in Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operation for the year ended December 31, 2013 dated February 10, 2014 for the McArthur River/Key Lake properties,
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(collectively the Technical Information) in the Form 40-F, and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of information derived from the
Technical Information in the Form 40-F.

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such Technical Information in the
registration statements (Nos. 333-11736, 333-6180 and 333-139165) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Stock Option Plan, registration statement (No. 333-139324) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Employee Share Ownership Plan and registration
statement (No.333-181577) on Form F-10.

Sincerely,



|                           |  |                                                         
|-------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Leslie (Les) D. Yesnik
|Name:                      |  | Leslie (Les) D. Yesnik, P. Eng.                         
|Title:                     |  | General Manager, Key Lake operations, Cameco Corporation
|                          
|Date: February 27, 2014
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group, Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Biology Subcommittee.                     

*Date:*                         June 12, 2007.                     

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         Gaithersburg Hilton, 620 Perry Parkway, Gaithersburg, MD 20877.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Gopal M. Bhatnagar, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 6100 Bldg Rm 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 435-6889,                         *bhatnagg@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 15, 2007. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 07-2546 Filed 5-21-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1202 TP 16-00742 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF SHANNON V. CAMPBELL, PETITIONER,

V ORDER

ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT.

SHANNON CAMPBELL, PETITIONER PRO SE.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (LAURA ETLINGER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Seneca County [Dennis F. Bender, A.J.], entered May 2, 2016) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a tier III hearing that petitioner had violated an inmate rule.
It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Entered: December 23, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
§ 169.609 Exhaust systems. Engine exhaust installations and associated cooling systems must be built in accordance with the requirements of American Boat and Yacht Council, Inc. Standard P-1, “Safe Installation of Exhaust Systems for Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery” and the following additional requirements: ( a ) All exhaust installations with pressures in excess of 15 pounds per square inch gage or employing runs passing through living or working spaces must meet the material specifications of part 56 of Title 46, Code of Federal Regulations.
( b ) Horizontal dry exhaust pipes are permitted if they do not pass through living or berthing spaces, terminate above the deepest load waterline, are arranged to prevent entry of cold water from rough seas, and are constructed of corrosion resistant material at the hull penetration.
( c ) When the exhaust cooling system is separate from the engine cooling system, a suitable warning device must be provided to indicate a failure of water flow in the exhaust cooling system.
[CGD 83-005, 51 FR 896, Jan. 9, 1986, as amended by USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58287, Sept. 29, 2014]
#### JOHN SCOGNAMIGLIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ANTONIO MODERO AND INNOCENZA MODERO, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Submitted January 26, 1929

Decided June 28, 1929.

Before Justices Trenchard, Kalisch: and Lloyd.

For the appellants, *Dante Reveiti.*

For the appellee, *A. Michael Lepore.*

Pee Curiam.

This is defendants’ appeal from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff in the District Court of the First Judicial District of the County of Hudson, by the trial judge, sitting without a jury.

Defendants were the owners of a store and apartment. The plaintiff was their tenant. When the lease was made plaintiff deposited $250 as security. Before the expiration *587of the lease a fire occurred rendering the premises occupied by plaintiff unfit for use, and the owners decided not to restore the premises, but instead accepted the keys from the tenant about a week after the fire. No repairs were made for more than two months. The premises were never restored to their original condition, hut two months after the fire were altered by the owners to suit their own purposes, and the owners thereafter occupied the same. The tenant thereupon demanded his deposit, hut it was refused. He thereupon brought this suit for the amount of his deposit, and the trial judge, without reciting the evidence, made a finding of facts from which the foregoing matters are extracted.

The trial judge also found that the defendants had accepted a surrender of the premises.

The defendants complain that the latter finding was not within the issues raised by the pleadings. To this the answer is that evidence showing acceptance of a surrender of the premises was competent under the pleadings, and it will be presumed that at the trial there was evidence justifying the finding, nothing appearing to the contrary.

We believe that these observations dispose of every question argued which seems to justify remark.

The judgment will be affirmed, with costs.
#### § 28.100 Applicability.

Each commercial fishing industry vessel must meet the requirements of this subpart, in addition to the requirements of parts 24, 25, and 26 of this chapter.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending December 2, 2006

|Filer                  | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                          
|---------------------- | ----------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|LINCO BANCSHARES, INC. | * 3A1       | LINCO Bancshares, Inc., Clayton, Missouri, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Centennial Bancshares Corporation, Elsberry, Missouri, and thereby indirectly acquire Bank of Lincoln County, Elsberry, Missouri. | Newspaper:12/23/2006Federal Register:12/29/2006
|Newspaper:             | 12/23/2006 
|Federal Register:      | 12/29/2006 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
EXHIBIT 11

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(In thousands, except earnings per share data)




Basic and Diluted
Earnings per Share:

                         Three Months ended       Six Months ended
                             June 30,                  June 30,
                           1998     1997            1998      1997


Net Income (Loss)       $(92,746) $(68,351)        $37,674   $(185,608)

Basic Earnings per
Common Share               ($.01)    ($.01)           $.00       ($.01)

Diluted Earnings
per Common Share             N/A       N/A            $.00        N/A

Weighted average common
    shares outstanding     15,875    12,602         15,854       12,602

Weighted average common
     shares outstanding
     assuming dilution     15,875    12,602         16,902       12,602
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000700941
<NAME>                        Advanced Remote Communication Solutions,Inc.


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999

<CASH>                          2,770,025
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   2,190,233
<ALLOWANCES>                    64,200
<INVENTORY>                     636,597
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                5,741,818
<PP&E>                          1,222,485
<DEPRECIATION>                  519,861
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  34,324,693
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           3,388,549
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     3,000,000
<COMMON>                        17,876,251
<OTHER-SE>                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    34,324,693
<SALES>                         2,477,567
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                2,477,567
<CGS>                           1,008,664
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   2,747,967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,739,303
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               203,157
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (470,531)
<INCOME-TAX>                    (112,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (358,031)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0



</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

R. GUNABALAN, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

MERIT LABORATORY 

PARTNERS, LLC, 

 Defendant. 

 

Case No. 4:15-cv-11706 

District Judge Terrence G. Berg 

Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti 

___________________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL AS MOOT 

(DE 7) 

 This matter is before the Court for consideration of Defendant’s motion to 

compel (DE 7), Plaintiff’s response in opposition (DE 10), and Defendant’s reply 

(DE 11). The motion was referred to me on May 26, 2016 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(A). (DE 17.) On June 29, 2016, the Court was informed that the parties 

had reached a settlement, with final papers to be submitted within thirty days. 

Accordingly, Defendant’s motion is DENIED AS MOOT. (DE 7.) 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 30, 2016 s/Anthony P. Patti 

 ANTHONY P. PATTI 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

4:15-cv-11706-TGB-MJH Doc # 20 Filed 06/30/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 269
2 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing order was sent to parties of record on 

June 30, 2016, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail. 

 s/Michael Williams 

 Case Manager for the 

 Honorable Anthony P. Patti 

 

4:15-cv-11706-TGB-MJH Doc # 20 Filed 06/30/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 270
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE
30, 1999 UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               38,886,000
<SECURITIES>                                         20,066,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                         5,638,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                           (463,000)
<INVENTORY>                                             629,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     68,232,000
<PP&E>                                               85,586,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (9,576,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      150,208,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                23,589,000
<BONDS>                                             150,062,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                48,649,000
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                 13,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          (75,647,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        150,208,000
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     30,264,000
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        21,545,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     (1,185,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         63,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    8,502,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       1,339,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                            535,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     804,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                            804,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.12)


</TABLE>