alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 327.27 Proof of amount claimed for personal injury. The following evidence must be presented when appropriate in claims: ( a ) Itemized medical, hospital, and burial bills.
( b ) A written report by the attending physician including: ( 1 ) The nature and extent of the injury and the treatment;
( 2 ) The necessity and reasonableness of the various medical expenses incurred;
( 3 ) Duration of time injuries prevented or limited employment;
( 4 ) Past, present, and future limitations on employment;
( 5 ) Duration and extent of pain and suffering and of any disability or physical disfigurement;
( 6 ) A current prognosis;
( 7 ) Any anticipated medical expenses;
( 8 ) Any past medical history of the claimant relevant to the particular injury alleged; and
( 9 ) If required by the Maritime Administration, an examination by an independent medical facility or physician to provide independent medical evidence against which to evaluate the written report of the claimant's physician. The Maritime Administration determines the need for this examination, makes mutually convenient arrangements for such an examination, and bears the costs thereof.
( c ) All hospital records or other medical documents from either this injury or any relevant past injury.
( d ) If the claimant is employed, a written statement by the claimant's employer certifying the claimant's: ( 1 ) Age;
( 2 ) Occupation;
( 3 ) Hours of employment;
( 4 ) Hourly rate of pay or weekly salary;
( 5 ) Time lost from work as a result of the incident; and
( 6 ) Claimant's actual period of employment, full-time or part-time, and any effect of the injury upon such employment to support claims for lost earnings.
( e ) If the claimant is self-employed, written statements, or other evidence showing: ( 1 ) The amount of earnings actually lost; and
( 2 ) The Federal tax return if filed for the three previous years.
( f ) If the claim arises out of injuries to a person providing services to the claimant, statement of the cost necessarily incurred to replace the services to which claimant is entitled under law.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DALC GEAR & BEARING SUPPLY CORP, 

MCGUIRE BEARING COMPANY, AND 

SHERMAN BEARINGS INC.,

Individually and on behalf of all others similarly 

situated,

Plaintiffs,

v. 

KOYO FRANCE SA, KOYO DEUTSCHLAND 

GMBH, NACHI TECHNOLOGY, INC., NACHI 

EUROPE GMBH, NSK EUROPE LTD., 

SCHAEFFLER TECHNOLOGIES GMBH & CO. 

KG, FAG KUGELFISCHER GMBH, AB SKF, 

SKF GMBH, SKF USA INC., NTN WALZLAGER 

(EUROPA) GMBH, AND NTN-SNR 

ROULEMENTS SA,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW ALEXANDER PEPPER 

AS COUNSEL

WHEREAS, Alexander H. Pepper, an attorney at Winston & Strawn LLP, who represents 

Defendants Koyo France S.A. and Koyo Deutschland GmbH is leaving the law firm of Winston 

& Strawn LLP; 

WHEREAS, Mr. Pepper requests that the Court enter an order allowing him to withdraw 

as counsel in the above-captioned action; 

WHEREAS, other counsel of record will continue to appear as counsel on behalf of the 

above-named Defendants in this action; 

Case 2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM ECF No. 235 filed 09/25/18 PageID.6361 Page 1 of 2
WHEREAS, Mr. Pepper’s withdrawal will not cause any delay in the progress of this 

action;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Mr. Pepper be permitted to withdraw as counsel for the 

above-named Defendants in this action.

Date: September 25, 2018 s/Marianne O. Battani 

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's 

ECF System to their respective email addresses or First Class U.S. mail to the non-ECF participants on 

September 25, 2018.

s/ Kay Doaks 

Case Manager

Case 2:15-cv-12068-MOB-MKM ECF No. 235 filed 09/25/18 PageID.6362 Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40981

 

LARRY D. McINNIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ERASMO E. BRAVO ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-96-CV-345

- - - - - - - - - -

April 7, 1997

Before KING, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Larry D. McInnis, Texas prisoner #651075, seeks leave to

proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on his appeal from the district

court’s order assessing the district-court filing fees required

by the Prison Litigation Act of 1995, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 

His motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED.

McInnis paid an initial partial district-court filing fee of

more than the district court ordered him to pay. His appeal from
No. 96-40981

- 2 -

the district court’s order therefore is moot, and we lack

jurisdiction to consider his contention that the district court’s

order was erroneous. Rocky v. King, 900 F.2d 864, 866-67 (5th

Cir. 1990).

APPEAL DISMISSED.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40781 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GILBERTO REGALADO RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-207-1

- - - - - - - - - - April 16, 1999 Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Gilberto Regalado Ramirez moves to withdraw as appellate counsel and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ramirez did not file a response to counsel’s motion. We have independently reviewed counsel’s brief and the record and found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
§ 197.434 Surface-supplied mixed-gas diving. The diving supervisor shall insure that— ( a ) When mixed-gas diving is conducted, a decompression chamber or a closed bell meeting the requirements of § 197.332 is ready for use at the dive location;
( b ) A diving stage is used except when a bell is provided;
( c ) A bell is used for dives deeper than 220 fsw or when the dive involves in-water decompression times greater than 120 minutes, except when the diver is using a heavy-weight diving outfit or is diving in a physically confining space;
( d ) A closed bell is used for dives at depths greater than 300 fsw, except when diving is conducted in a physically confining space;
( e ) A separate dive team member tends each diver in the water;
( f ) A standby diver is available during all nonsaturation dives;
( g ) When saturation diving is conducted— ( 1 ) A standby diver is available when the closed bell leaves the dive location until the divers are in saturation; and
( 2 ) A member of the dive team at the dive location is a diver able to assist in the recovery of the closed bell or its occupants, if required;
( h ) When closed bell operations are conducted, a diver is available in the closed bell to assist a diver in the water;
( i ) When a diver is in a physically confining space, another diver is stationed at the underwater point of entry and is line-tending the diver;
( j ) Each diving operation has a primary and secondary breathing gas supply meeting the requirements of § 197.340; and
( k ) The surface-supplied mixed-gas diver has the equipment required by § 197.346 (b) or (d).
§ 32.56-25 Category A machinery spaces: Windows and port lights—T/ALL. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section and subpart 111.105, of this chapter, boundaries of category A machinery spaces and boundaries of cargo pumprooms must not be pierced for windows or portlights.
( b ) Skylights that can be closed from outside the spaces they serve may be fitted in boundaries of category A machinery spaces.
[CGD 74-127, 41 FR 3844, Jan. 26, 1976, as amended by CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15230, Apr. 8, 1982]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

Combat Veterans For Congress PAC 

Plaintiff 

vs. Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-02168-CKK 

Federal Election Commission 

Defendant 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

Notice is hereby given this 26th day of November , 20.J.l__ , that 

Plaintiffs 

hereby appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from 

the judgment of this Court entered on the 30th day of September ,20~ 

in favor of Defendant 

against said Plaintiffs 

(Pursuant to Rule 4( a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure a notice of appeal in a civil 

action must be filed within 30 days after the date of entry of judgment or 60 days if the United 

States or officer or agency is a party) 

CLERK Please mail copies of the above Notice of Appeal to the following at the addresses 

indicated: 

non; all parties receive ECF communications. 

Case 1:11-cv-02168-CKK Document 32 Filed 11/26/13 Page 1 of 1
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending August 12, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 380.10 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to prescribe the requirements for the submission of applications for designation of vessels as American Great Lakes vessels, subject to the conditions imposed by section 1522 of Pub. L. 101-624 (November 28, 1990).
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending August 5, 2006

|Filer                         | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                                  
|----------------------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|BANK OF MOUNTAIN VIEW         | Member         | Bank of Mountain View, Mountain View, Arkansas, to become a member of the Federal Reserve System.                                                                                                   | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                    | Not applicable
|Federal Register:             | Not applicable
|EXCHANGE BANCSHARES, INC.     | * 3A3          | Exchange Bancshares, Inc., Mayfield, Kentucky, to acquire 100 percent of Purchase Area Bancorp, Inc., Bardwell, Kentucky, and thereby indirectly acquire Bardwell Deposit Bank, Bardwell, Kentucky. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:09/01/2006     
|Newspaper:                    | Not available 
|Federal Register:             | 09/01/2006    
|UNITED CITIZENS BANCORP, INC. | * 3A1          | United Citizens Bancorp, Inc., Columbia, Kentucky, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of United Citizens Bank of Southern Kentucky, Inc., Columbia, Kentucky.                | Newspaper:09/11/2006Federal Register:09/05/2006        
|Newspaper:                    | 09/11/2006    
|Federal Register:             | 09/05/2006    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                      | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|FARMERS & MERCHANTS BK, STUTTGART, ARKANSAS | 677644 | 05/01/2006 | 07/26/2006     | S         | Int Sm Bank

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1408

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that a taxpayer

may elect to include in income crop insurance proceeds and disaster

payments in the year of the disaster or in the following year, and

for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 5, 1995

Mr. MINGE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that a taxpayer may elect to include in income crop

insurance proceeds and disaster payments in the year

of the disaster or in the following year, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SPECIAL RULE FOR CROP INSURANCE PRO4 CEEDS AND DISASTER PAYMENTS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 451(d) of the Internal

6 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special rule for crop
2

•HR 1408 IH

1 insurance proceeds and disaster payments) is amended to

2 read as follows:

3 ‘‘(d) SPECIAL RULE FOR CROP INSURANCE PRO4 CEEDS AND DISASTER PAYMENTS.—

5 ‘‘(1) GENERAL RULE.—In the case of any pay6 ment described in paragraph (2), a taxpayer report7 ing on the cash receipts and disbursements method

8 of accounting—

9 ‘‘(A) may elect to treat any such payment

10 received in the taxable year of destruction or

11 damage of crops as having been received in the

12 following taxable year if the taxpayer estab13 lishes that, under the taxpayer’s practice, in14 come from such crops involved would have been

15 reported in a following taxable year, or

16 ‘‘(B) may elect to treat any such payment

17 received in a taxable year following the taxable

18 year of the destruction or damage of crops as

19 having been received in the taxable year of de20 struction or damage, if the taxpayer establishes

21 that, under the taxpayer’s practice, income

22 from such crops involved would have been re23 ported in the taxable year of destruction or

24 damage.
3

•HR 1408 IH

1 ‘‘(2) PAYMENTS DESCRIBED.—For purposes of

2 this subsection, a payment is described in this para3 graph if such payment—

4 ‘‘(A) is insurance proceeds received on ac5 count of destruction or damage to crops, or

6 ‘‘(B) is disaster assistance received under

7 any Federal law as a result of—

8 ‘‘(i) destruction or damage to crops

9 caused by drought, flood, or other natural

10 disaster, or

11 ‘‘(ii) inability to plant crops because

12 of such a disaster.’’.

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

14 subsection (a) applies to payments received after Decem15 ber 31, 1992, as a result of destruction or damage occur16 ring after such date.

Æ
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2379 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide certain veterans an 

opportunity to increase the amount of Veterans’ Group Life Insurance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 13, 2009 

Mr. BUYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide certain 

veterans an opportunity to increase the amount of Veterans’ Group Life Insurance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans’ Group Life 

5 Insurance Improvement Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASED AMOUNT OF VETERANS’ GROUP LIFE 

7 INSURANCE. 

8 Section 1977(a) of title 38, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 2379 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘Except as 

2 provided in paragraph (3),’’ before ‘‘Veterans’ Group 

3 Life Insurance shall be’’; and 

4 (2) by adding after paragraph (2) the following 

5 new paragraph: 

6 ‘‘(3) Not more than once in each five-year period be7 ginning on the date a person becomes insured under Vet8 erans’ Group Life Insurance, such person may elect in 

9 writing to increase the amount for which the person is in10 sured if— 

11 ‘‘(A) the person is under the age of 60; 

12 ‘‘(B) the increased amount is not more than 

13 $25,000; and 

14 ‘‘(C) the amount for which the person is in15 sured does not exceed the amount provided for 

16 under section 1967(a)(3)(A)(i) of this title.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 86 (Friday, May 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 25323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2185]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, R-13 Conference 
Applications.
    Date: May 14, 2007.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: D.G. Patel, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of 
Health, Room 914, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, 
(301) 594-7682, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9cecfde8f9f0f8fbdcf2f5f8f8f7b2f2f5f4b2fbf3ea"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="33435247565f5754735d5a5757581d5d5a5b1d545c45">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 27, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2185 Filed 5-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 45.33 Diamond. ( a ) Each vessel must be marked with the diamond mark described in figure 2 of § 45.35 amidships below the upper edge of the deck line on each side with the center of the loadline mark at a distance below the deck line equal to the summer freeboard assigned under this part.
( b ) The width of each line in the loadline mark must be 1 inch.
OoT-OST- 3003- \\^T( o 

March 5, 2010 ,„_,^,p,. 

Mr. Todd M. Horman 

Director 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Essential Air Service at Salina, Kansas 

Docket DOT-OST 2002-11376 

Dear Mr. Horman: 

I feel that the citizens of Salina, Kansas have not had the opportunity to voice our views regarding airline 

service. Many of us have contacted local newspapers and agencies with concerns of "our" leaders and 

the decisions that best represent our community. The buddy system in Salina needs to be corrected. 

Maybe we could start here. I do not feel that Sea Port Airlines or Sovereign Air is what the people of 

Salina want. NO SECURITY in America today? Salina is a community of almost 50,000 people who drive 

to Kansas City and Wichita instead of flying out of Salina. Why? Granted, Great Lakes Airlines has been 

experiencing some difficulties right now, but given a chance and the opportunity to fly to Denver on a 19 

passenger planes will encourage people to fly rather than drive from Salina. A 9 passenger plane with 

NO SECURITY will not encourage people to fly. I would not want my loved ones on that airplane and 

many of the people that I have talked with personally feel the same. Please take this into consideration 

before the U.S. DOT waives the EAS program requirements for service at Salina. We as a community 

need at least 15 passenger seats. Thank you for considering my comments. 

Respectfully, 

Curtis Hagen
#### § 167.60-10 Exhibition of certificate of inspection.

On every nautical school ship, the original certificate of inspection shall be framed under glass and posted in a conspicuous place.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Park Place Entertainment Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Wallace R. Barr, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)                    The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)                    The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated the 13th day of November 2003

 

 
| /S/  WALLACE R. BARR                    |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Wallace  R. Barr                        |   |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer, |   |
| Park  Place Entertainment Corporation   |   |

 

----