alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending July 21, 2007

|Filer                               | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                                  
|----------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|STATE STREET INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS | Other Foreign  | State Street International Holdings, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts - prior notice to engage in dealing in equity securities outside the U.S. through State Street Global Markets International, Limited, London, England pursuant to section 211.10(a)(15) of Regulation K. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                          | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                   | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.28

                                  "ADDENDUM A"
                                SIPEX CORPORATION
                              DISTRIBUTOR AGREEMENT

As per the provisions of the Distributor Agreement between SIPEX CORPORATION and
FUTURE ELECTRONICS dated July 1, 1993, the following modifications shall apply;

1. Please change Section 5 (f) to now read as follows:

         F.O.B. Point of Entry, Americas, Europe, Asia.

2. Please change Section 6 to now read as follows:

         Supplier will invoice Future upon shipment of each order. Such invoices
         shall be due and payable in full by Future within thirty (30) calendar
         days following date of invoice.

3. Please change Section 7 (a) to now read as follows:

         Quarterly Rotation. Within forty-five (45) calendar days following each
         period of three (3) consecutive months during the term, FUTURE may
         return to SUPPLIER for credit, a quantity of Products the value of ten
         percent (10%) of the net sales dollars invoiced by SUPPLIER to FUTURE
         for all Products purchased by FUTURE during the previous three (3)
         month period. Credit issued for such returned Products will be based
         upon the price paid by FUTURE, less any prior credits granted by
         SUPPLIER on the returned Product and applied against future purchases
         of Products from SUPPLIER. FUTURE may make such returns from one or
         more stocking locations(s). The foregoing return privilege shall be
         subject to the following conditions;

                  (1) The Products are returned in merchantable condition;

                  (2) Prior to returning any Products, FUTURE obtains a Return
                      Material Authorization from SUPPLIER.

All other terms and conditions to the Distributor Agreement dated July 1, 1993
between Sipex Corporation and Future Electronics shall remain unchanged.

FUTURE ELECTRONICS                                SIPEX CORPORATION

BY: /s/ Sam Abrams                                BY: /s/ Walid Maghribi
    ----------------------------                      --------------------------
        Sam Abrams                                        Walid Maghribi
        Printed Name                                      Printed Name

TITLE: Executive Vice President                   TITLE:President & CEO

DATE: February 7, 2003                            DATE: 2/13/03
#### § 131.920 Level of manning.

Each vessel must carry the personnel required by the Certificate of Inspection, as determined by the cognizant OCMI, based on an evaluation under part 15 of this chapter.
AMENDMENT TO COLLATERAL INSTALLMENT NOTE

 

	THIS AMENDMENT TO COLLATERAL INSTALLMENT NOTE dated as of the 21st day of May, 2004, by and between MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL, A DIVISION OF MERRILL LYNCH BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC. ("MLC") and PAC-WEST TELECOMM, INC. ("DebtorCustomer").

	This Amendment is made part of and modifies the Collateral Installment Note dated May 21, 2004 (the "Note") in favor of MLC in the original principal amount of $2,400,887.18. Terms otherwise not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement. To the extent of any conflict or inconsistency between this Amendment and the terms and conditions of the Agreement, this Amendment will prevail.

The following section of the Agreement is hereby modified:

1. The first paragraph of Section 2, PAYMENT AND OTHER TERMS, is hereby amended and restated as follows:

"**2.	PAYMENT AND OTHER TERMS.** Customer shall pay the indebtedness under this Note in 36 consecutive monthly installments commencing on the first day of the second calendar month following the Closing Date and continuing on the first day of each calendar month thereafter until this Note shall be paid in full. Each such installment shall be in the amount which will fully amortize the Loan Amount with accrued interest in equal monthly installments over a term of 36 months (except that there shall be added to the first such installment an additional amount equal to accrued interest at the Interest Rate from the date of funding to the last day of the calendar month in which funding occurs). 

2.	This Amendment shall be deemed effective as of the original date of the Note.

3.	Except as expressly set forth herein, the terms and conditions of the Note remain unmodified and in full force and effect. This Amendment is binding upon, and inures to the benefit of, the successors and assigns of the parties hereto.

 

	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed and effective as of the date first above set forth.

	MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL, A DIVISION OF MERRILL

	LYNCH BUSINESS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.

	 By:/s/ Steve Coley			
	 Name: Steve Coley			
	 Title: Vice President-Group Credit Manager 
PAC-WEST TELECOMM, INC.

By: /s/ H. Ravi Brar			
Name: H. Ravi Brar			
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA

# ACTION:

 Notice of meetings

# SUMMARY:

The Eastern Washington Cascades Provincial Advisory Committee and the Yakima Provincial Advisory committee will meet on Friday, May 18, and on Thursday, June 14, 2007 at the Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests Headquarters office, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, WA. These meetings will begin at 9 a.m. and continue until 4 p.m. During these meetings Provincial Advisory Committee members will either continue discussion on Roadless Area considerations and potential Wilderness recommendations in conjunction with Forest Plan Revision for the Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests or discuss Recreation Facility Master Planning. All Eastern Washington Cascades and Yakima Province Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Direct questions regarding this meeting to Paul Hart, Designated Federal Official, USDA, Wenatchee National Forest, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, Washington 98801, 509-664-9200.

Dated: April 17, 2007.

Paul Hart,

Designated Federal Official, Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests.

[FR Doc. 07-1993  Filed 4-20-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending November 11, 2006

|Filer                           | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                                  
|------------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|MAYFLOWER BANCORP, INC          | 3A1            | Mayflower Bancorp, Inc., Middleboro, Massachusetts - section 3(a)(1) expedited notice to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100% of Mayflower Co-operative Bank, Middleboro, Massachusetts | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                      | Not applicable
|Federal Register:               | Not applicable
|ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC, THE | FBSEA          | The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, Edinburgh, Scotland to establish a branch at 600 Steamboat Road, Greenwich, Connecticut pursuant to section 211.24(a)(1) of Regulation K.                          | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable 
|Newspaper:                      | Not available 
|Federal Register:               | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 95 (Thursday, May 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2434]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; 
Clearinghouse Contract Review.
    Date: June 5, 2007.
    Time: 7 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Helen Lin, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, 
NIH/NIAMS/RB, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800, Plaza One, Bethesda, 
MD 20817, 301-594-4952, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1d717473752c5d707c747133737475337a726b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="503c393e3861103d31393c7e3e39387e373f26">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS).

    Dated: May 9, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2434 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of i2 Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sanjiv S. Sidhu, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.





|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    SANJIV S. SIDHU                                                      
|Sanjiv S. Sidhu Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
|March 15, 2004                                                              



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2012126EN.01000701.xml

| 28.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/7

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 17 February 2012 — Criminal proceedings against Minh Khoa V o

(Case C-83/12)

2012/C 126/13

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Minh Khoa V o

Other party: Generalbundesanwalt beim Bundesgerichtshof

Other party:

Question referred

Question referred

Are Articles 21 and 34 of Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 establishing a Community Code on Visas (‘the Visa Code’), (1) which regulate the issue and annulment of a uniform visa, to be interpreted as precluding criminal liability, resulting from the application of national legislation, for the smuggling of foreign nationals in cases where, although they hold visas, the persons smuggled obtained those visas by deceiving the competent authorities of another Member State as to the true purpose of their journey?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2009 L 243, p. 1.

1

---
#### Solomon *v.*Chesley *& a.*

In an action on a bond given to indemnify one against loss from an injunction granted under the 36th rule in chancery, on a bill in equity brought to vacate a judgment and enjoin execution upon it, the reasonable counsel fees incurred in defending against the bill may be recovered as damages.

Debt, on the bond of the defendants given to indemnify Mohr, Solomon & Mohr against loss from an injunction issued against them, under the 36th rule in chancery. The plaintiff, as surviving partner of Mohr, Solomon & Mohr, recovered judgment against Chesley, and took execution upon it. Chesley, charging that the judgment was obtained by fraud, filed a bill in equity to vacate it and restrain its collection, and, upon filing the bond in suit, procured a temporary injunction. The bill was tried, and failed. Sub*25sequently, on review, the original suit at law was tried, and the judgment reversed.

The plaintiff claims, as damages, the amount of the judgment in the original suit, the taxable costs in the equity suit, and the charges of counsel in defending it.

*Gr. O. Bartlett,*for the plaintiff.

*Towle*and *Frink,*for the defendants.

Allen, J.

The equity proceeding, instituted to vacate and enjoin the judgment obtained in the first suit of *Solomon*v. *Chesley,*failed, and left that judgment just where the proceeding found it. The bond was given to indemnify tbe defendant in that proceeding in case it was determined in his favor, as it eventually was. The equity suit was independent of the action of review, and did not aid in showing the first judgment to be erroneous. The result made it manifest that it was a groundless proceeding, and the right of the prevailing party to the cost of defending against it was not affected by the result of the action of review.

The obligation of the bond was to fully indemnify the plaintiff from all loss, cost, or damages arising from the injunction. 36th Rule in Chancery; *Towle*v. *Towle,*46 N. H. 431. The damages were such as naturally resulted from the dilatory operation of the bill in equity, the injunction staying execution on the judgment in the suit at law, and the costs incident to the proceeding, including reasonable counsel fees. *Derry Bank*v. *Heath,*45 N. H. 524. He could not include in his damages the amount of the judgment, for he was not entitled to retain it. Had he been Untitled to retain it, he could not make the amount a part of his damages here, unless the injunction, by delay, would have prevented the subsequent collection of the judgment. It not appearing that he has not collected, or might not now collect, the taxable costs of the equity suit of the party prosecuting it, he cannot include that item in his damages.

The reasonable counsel fees incurred in defending against the bill were costs which it was the plaintiff’s right, if not his duty, to incur, and which naturally resulted from the proceeding, and these he can recover.

*Case discharged.*

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
### The Honorable Lawrence O. Davis, United States Magistrat e 1 

### Judge fo r the Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case wa s referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). ___________ No. 96-2356

___________ Herbert Clinton McKnight, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Missouri Division of Family * Eastern District of Missouri. Services; Frances Johnson; * [UNPUBLISHED] Beverly Long; Linda Russell; * Tina Thompson, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: December 26, 1996 Filed: January 2, 1997

___________ Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Herbert Clinton McKnight appeals the district court's adverse grant 1 of summary judgment o n his age-based discriminatory transfer and failureto-hire claims. The district court concluded that McKnight failed t o establish a prima fac ie discriminatory transfer case because he failed to showthat the transfer was an adverse employment action, and that , althou ghMcKnight did establish a prima facie failure-to-hire case, hi s claim failed because he failed to show that his employer's proffered reaso n was pretextual. Having carefully reviewed the record, the parties' briefs , and the

### -2-

partie s' submissions, we conclude that the judgment was correct . Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Stanley Burton

CEO

Nation Aerial MMS, Inc.

42050 Humber Dr. Temecula, Ca. 92591 (949)295-2718

Docket No. FAA-2015-3152

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590!

Attn: Brenda Robeson/ Program Analyst

Re: Request for Additional Information

November 30, 2015

Ms. Robeson,

In response to your letter requesting additional information; Nation 

Aerial MMS, Inc. would like to amend the above referenced docket so 

that the proposed operation will not include closed-set filming, so 

therefore a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations 

Manual that was requested has not been included in this response.

Sincerely,

Stanley Burton

CEO, Nation Aerial MMS, Inc.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. §1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lakes Entertainment,Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for theperiod ended July 2, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Lyle Berman, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, and Timothy J. Cope, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.     /s/ Lyle Berman       Lyle Berman     Chief Executive Officer      /s/ Timothy J. Cope       Timothy J. Cope     President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 10, 2006