alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending June 21, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 24H

                           SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, constitutes and 
appoints JOSEPH HINES and BRADLEY C. ANDERSON, and each of them, his true and 
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution and 
resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all 
capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended 
July 31, 1998, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Zila, 
Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with any and all amendments to such Form 
10-K, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in 
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting to 
such attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority 
to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be 
done in and about the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as he 
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such 
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or each of them, may lawfully do or cause to be 
done by virtue hereof.

DATED: October 27, 1998

                                        /s/ THOMAS B. SIMONE
                                        ------------------------
                                            THOMAS B. SIMONE

STATE OF ARIZONA
                         ss.
County of Maricopa

     On this 27th day of October, 1998, before me, the undersigned Notary 
Public, personally appeared THOMAS B. SIMONE, known to me to be the person
whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he
executed the same for the purposes therein contained.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.

                                        /s/ JANICE BACKUS
                                        ------------------------
                                            Notary Public

My commission expires:

October 23, 2001
#### § 381.9 Available U.S.-flag service.

For purposes of shipping bulk agricultural commodities under programs administered by sponsoring Federal agencies from U.S. Great Lakes ports during the 1996-2000 Great Lakes shipping seasons, if direct all-U.S.-flag service, at fair and reasonable rates, is not available at U.S. Great Lakes ports, a joint service involving a foreign-flag vessel(s) carrying cargo no farther than a Canadian port(s) or other point(s) on the Gulf of St. Lawrence, with transshipment via a U.S.-flag privately-owned commercial vessel to the ultimate foreign destination, will be deemed to comply with the requirement of “available” commercial U.S.-flag service under the Cargo Preference Act of 1954. Shipper agencies considering bids resulting in the lowest landed cost of transportation based on U.S.-flag rates and service shall include within the comparison of U.S.-flag rates and service, for shipments originating in U.S. Great Lakes ports, through rates (if offered) to a Canadian port or other point on the Gulf of St. Lawrence and a U.S.-flag leg for the remainder of the voyage. The “fair and reasonable” rate for this mixed service will be determined by considering the U.S.-flag component under the existing regulations at 46 CFR part 382 or 383, as appropriate, and incorporating the cost for the foreign-flag component into the U.S.-flag “fair and reasonable” rate in the same way as the cost of foreign-flag vessels used to lighten U.S.-flag vessels in the recipient country's territorial waters. Alternatively, the supplier of the commodity may offer the Cargo FOB Canadian transshipment point, and MARAD will determine fair and reasonable rates accordingly.

[61 FR 24897, May 17, 1996]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending March 11, 2006

|Filer                                   | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      | End of Comment Period                              
|--------------------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|BOSTON PRIVATE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. | 4c8            | Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts - notification pursuant to section 4(c)(8) of the BHC Act to acquire 100% direct ownership of Anchor Capital Holdings LLC, Boston, Massachusetts (Anchor Holdings) and 80% interests to be held by Anchor Holdings in each of Anchor Capital Advisors LLC and Anchor/Russell Capital Advisors LLC, both of Boston, Massachusetts and thereby engage in financial and investment advisory activities pursuant to section 225.28(b)(6) of Regulation Y. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:03/28/2006
|Newspaper:                              | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                       | 03/28/2006    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
1 No. 06-14-00 133

- CR

IN THE

COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH SUPREME

JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TEXARKANA

DAVID MICHAEL DOLLINS,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appealed in Cause No. F-8840

8 th Judicial District Court of Franklin County, Texas

APPELLEE MOTION FOR EXTENSION ACCEPTED 06-14-00133-CR SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 1/27/2015 2:27:39 PM DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK2 By:/s/ Nicholas C. Harrison

Nicholas C. Harrison
Assistant District Attorney

State Bar No 24062768

P.O. Box 882
Sulphur Springs, Texas 75483

(903) 885

- 06413 NO. 06

- 14

- 00133

- CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

VS. § 6TH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT

DAVID MICHAEL DOLLINS § TEXARKANA, TEXAS

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:

N OW COMES the State of Texas by and through her District Attorney for the Eighth

Judicial District of Franklin County, Texas, regarding the above styled and numbered cause, and

would respectfully request an extension of time for filing the State’s brief in said case pursuant to

Rule 73 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and would respectfully show the following:

I.

The Brief for the State on appeal was due to be filed on or before 9 th day of February

201 5

.

II.

That the State respectfully request s this Honorable Court t o grant an extension of time of

30 days. In connection therewith, the State would show the following facts relied upon in good

faith to show good cause to the Honorable Court of Appeals regarding this motion for extension

of time:

T he attorney for the State of Texas responsible for writing the Appellee’s brief will be

trying a multiple

- indictment Indecency with a Child case during the week of February

2, 2015.4 This request for an extension of time is sought not for delay but to pro vide the State with

an adequate amount of time to properly respond to the Appellant’s brief so that justice may be

done.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the State of Texas respectfully requests and

prays that the Honorable Court of Appeals grant an extensi on up to the present day to prepare

and file an Appellee Brief.

Respectfully submitted,

Nicholas C. Harrison
Assistant District Attorney

By:/s/ Nicholas C. Harrison

Nicholas C. Harrison
Assistant District Attorney

State Bar No 24062768

P.O. Box 882
Sulphur Springs, Texas 75483

(903) 885

- 06415 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and fore go ing instrument was
forwarded to the attorney for the Defendant o n January 27, 2015.

By:/s/ Nicholas C. Harrison

Nicholas C. Harrison
Assistant District Attorney

State Bar No 24062768

P.O. Box 882
Sulphur Springs, Texas 75483

(903) 885

- 0641

(903) 885

- 0640 (fax)
New Jersey Department of Labor, Workmen’s Compensation Bureau.

#### FRANK B. HAGAMAN, PETITIONER, v. HAHNE & COMPANY, A CORPORATION, RESPONDENT.

*698For the respondent, *Charles*IF. *Broadhursi,*of *Collins £ Corbin.*

For the petitioner, *Mr. Lewis,*of *Osborne, Cornish & Scheclc.*

*i\t*H:

1. Sometime prior to August 10th, 1927, the petitioner sustained an injury to his right hand, which injury caused a permanent disability of said hand, the exact percentage of which it is at this time impossible to determine.

2. On August 10th, 1927, while employed by the respondent as a salesman in the hardware department, the petitioner, while lifting a lawn mower from the floor to a table, strained or twisted his right wrist. He continued to work, however, for a period of about ten days, at which time he was laid off because of lack of work. Although he notified his foreman within a few days after August 10th, 1927, that he had hurt his wrist, and although he was requested by the foreman to go to the nurse of the respondent for treatment, he did not do this and did not seek medical treatment until some little time after this accident.

3. When examined by Dr. Szerlip on behalf of the respondent October 27th, 1927, that doctor found a permanent disability at that time of fifteen per cent, of the hand, but was unable to determine exactly what percentage was due to the first accident and what percentage was due to the second accident.

4. The attorneys for the respective parties, with the approval of the petitioner, have agreed to adjust this matter by paying teii per cent, of the amount, or fifteen weeks at the rate of $17 per week. The petitioner did not have any temporary disability and no medical treatments. The respondent agrees to pay $50 to Osborne, Cornish & Scheck as counsel fee.

It is ordered and adjudged that judgment he and the same hereby is entered in the above matter as above stated.

Hakky J. Goas, *Deputy Commissioner.*
§ 32.05-1 Draft marks and draft indicating systems—TB/ALL. ( a ) All vessels must have draft marks plainly and legibly visible upon the stem and upon the sternpost or rudderpost or at any place at the stern of the vessel as may be necessary for easy observance. The bottom of each mark must indicate the draft.
( b ) The draft must be taken from the bottom of the keel to the surface of the water at the location of the marks.
( c ) In cases where the keel does not extend forward or aft to the location of the draft marks, due to raked stem or cutaway skeg, the datum line from which the drafts shall be taken, shall be obtained by projecting the line of the bottom of the keel forward or aft, as the case may be, to the location of the draft marks.
( d ) In cases where a vessel may have a skeg or other appendage extending locally below the line of the keel, the draft at the end of the vessel adjacent to such appendage shall be measured to a line tangent to the lowest part of such appendage and parallel to the line of the bottom of the keel.
( e ) Draft marks must be separated so that the projections of the marks onto a vertical plane are of uniform height equal to the vertical spacing between consecutive marks.
( f ) Draft marks must be painted in contrasting color to the hull.
( g ) In cases where draft marks are obscured due to operational constraints or by protrusions, the vessel must be fitted with a reliable draft indicating system from which the bow and stern drafts can be determined.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16671, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGD 89-037, 57 FR 41821, Sept. 11, 1992]
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 242 

To direct the Secretary of Labor to revise regulations concerning the recording 

and reporting of occupational injuries and illnesses under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2009 

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Labor to revise regulations concerning the recording and reporting of occupational injuries and illnesses under the Occupational Safety and 

Health Act of 1970. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RECORDING AND REPORTING OF OCCUPA4 TIONAL INJURIES AND ILLNESSES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

6 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Labor shall 

7 revise the regulations in part 1904 of title 29, Code of 

8 Federal Regulations, concerning the recording and reportVerDate Nov 24 2008 00:26 Jan 12, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H242.IH H242

rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

HR 242 IH 

1 ing of occupational injuries and illnesses under the Occu2 pational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 651 

3 et seq.), to require site-controlling employers to keep a site 

4 log for all recordable injuries and illnesses occurring 

5 among all employees on the particular site, whether such 

6 employees are employed directly by the site-controlling em7 ployer or are employed by contractors or temporary help 

8 or employee leasing services. 

9 (b) DEFINITION.—As used in this section, the term 

10 ‘‘site-controlling employer’’ means the employer that has 

11 primary control over the work on a particular work site 

12 and supervises the employees on a day-to-day basis on a 

13 particular work site. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     In connection with the Annual Report of Zila, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended July 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas D. Burkett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/  DOUGLAS D. BURKETT Ph.D. |
|------------------------------------|
|                                    |
| **Douglas D.   Burkett Ph.D.**     |
| **Chief   Executive Officer**      |
| **October   27, 2003**             |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Zila, Inc. and will be retained by Zila, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at December 31, 1997 and the Statement of Operations for
the Year Ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,669
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  182,172
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               184,841
<PP&E>                                       5,406,615
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,281,109
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,310,347
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              686
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,309,661
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,310,347
<SALES>                                      1,466,069
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,470,302
<CGS>                                          856,275
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  856,275
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               340,615
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                273,412
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            273,412
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   273,412
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    16.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    16.39
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2 Certification by the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Octillion Corp. (the Company) on the Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Terri DuMoulin, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.  OCTILLION CORP.Date:  June 30, 2006By:/s/ Terri DuMoulinTerri DuMoulin
Principal Financial Officer  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending March 4, 2006

----

EnforcementCivitas BankGroup, Inc., Franklin, Tennessee  -- written agreement dated April 21, 2005, terminated February 21, 2006.					-Announced, March 2, 2006 					

FormsForms  -- final Board review to revise without extension the Consolidated Financial Statements for Bank Holding Companies (FR Y-9C), Parent Company Only Financial Statements for Large Bank Holding Companies (FR Y-9LP), and Parent Company Only Financial Statements for Small Bank Holding Companies (FR Y-9SP).					-Approved, February 28, 2006 					

Regulations And PoliciesCommunity Reinvestment Act  -- final interagency guidance regarding recent revisions to the implementing regulations.					-Approved, March 1, 2006 					

Testimony And StatementsRegulatory Relief  -- statement by Governor Kohn before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.					-Published, March 1, 2006 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: March 9, 2006