alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      15.1**





November
      14, 2007





American
      Medical Alert Corp.


Oceanside,
      New York





We
      have
      reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
      Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information
      of
      American Medical Alert Corp. and Subsidiaries for the fiscal periods ended
      September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006, as indicated in our report dated
      November 12, 2007. Because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion
      on that information.





We
      are
      aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, is incorporated
      by
      reference in the following Registration Statements:




·
            Registration
                Statement No. 33-48385 on Form S-8;


·
            Registration
                Statement No. 33-91806 on Form S-8;


·
            Registration
                Statement No. 333-53029 on Form
                S-8;


·
            Registration
                Statement No. 333-70626 on Form
                S-8;


·
            Registration
                Statement No. 333-130811 on Form S-8;
                and


·
            Registration
                Statement No. 333-88192 on Form
                S-3.





We
      also
      are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the
      Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is not considered a part of the Registration
      Statements prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
      certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the
      Securities Act of 1933, as amended.








Margolin, Winer & Evens LLP


Margolin,
      Winer & Evens LLP


Garden
      City, New York


41
#### § 35.10-5 Muster lists, emergency signals, and manning—T/ALL.

The requirements for muster lists, emergency signals, and manning must be in accordance with subchapter W (Lifesaving Appliances and Arrangements) of this chapter.

[CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25287, May 20, 1996]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 95 (Thursday, May 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27824-27825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2436]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Initial Review Group; Biomedical Research Review 
Subcommittee.
    Date: June 4-5, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Philippe Marmillot, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, NIH/NIAAA, OEA, room 3045, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 301-443-2861, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7c111d0e1115101013080c3c111d151052121514521b130a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f79a96859a9e9b9b988387b79a969e9bd9999e9fd9909881">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Developmental Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


[[Page 27825]]


    Dated: May 9, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2436 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 0342 Directorate ID : 2011 - SW - 028 - AD Helicopter Model: MD Helicopters, Inc., Model MD900 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 12 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : We are proposing this AD to detect a crack in the main rotor lower hub assembly and this assembly

and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $12,480 per hub Labor per Helicopter ( 1 x $ 8 5 /work - hour for the visual inspection) (1 x $85/work - hour for the eddy current inspection) (11 x $85/work - hour to replace the M/R lower hub) $ 85 $85 $935 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 13,585, assuming the lower hub would get replaced Total US Fleet Cost $ 163,020, assuming that the lower hubs for the entire fleet would get replaced Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Eric Schrieber
#### John L. Brownell, *Respondent, v.*Elisha Ruckman, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Dykman, J.,. not sitting.
# C_2013046EN.01002901.xml

| 16.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/29

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 17 July 2012 — BG v European Ombudsman

(Case F-54/11) (1)

1

(Civil service - Disciplinary measure - Disciplinary sanction - Removal from post - Existence of a preliminary investigation before the national criminal courts at the time of adoption of the decision to remove the applicant from her post - Equal treatment for men and women - Prohibition of the dismissal of a pregnant worker during the period from the beginning of pregnancy to the end of maternity leave)

2013/C 46/55

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: BG (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Ombudsman (represented by: J. Sant’Anna, Agent, D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Civil service — Application for annulment of the decision to apply to the applicant the disciplinary measure of dismissal without loss of pension rights. Consequently, a claim, primarily, to restore the applicant to her post and, in the alternative, to grant her a sum corresponding to the remuneration which she would have received between the date of effect of the dismissal and the date at which she will reach retirement age. In any event, the grant of a sum to the applicant in respect of the non-material damage suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action brought by BG; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action brought by BG;

| 2. | Orders BG to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Ombudsman. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders BG to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Ombudsman.

---

(1)  OJ C 204, 9.7.2011, p. 30.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ARNOLD INDUSTRIES, INC.'S FORM 10-Q
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      28,182,824
<SECURITIES>                                 5,885,095
<RECEIVABLES>                               45,350,686
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,956,287
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            95,465,235
<PP&E>                                     356,433,172
<DEPRECIATION>                             146,849,819
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             323,812,320
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       56,012,960
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    29,942,628
<OTHER-SE>                                 193,658,753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               323,812,320
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           300,493,801
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              259,862,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               861,750
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             838,202
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             40,393,377
<INCOME-TAX>                                14,901,973
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         25,491,404
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                25,491,404
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .98
        

</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending October 13, 2007

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 308.508 Issuance of an Open Cargo Policy. ( a ) *Time.* The underwriting agent will issue an Open Cargo Policy within fifteen (15) days after the completion by the applicant of the requirements set forth in §§ 308.506 and 308.507 unless the time for issuance is extended by the Maritime Administrator in writing. The underwriting agent may not make any Open Cargo Policy effective with respect to shipments attaching on a date earlier than the date when the application was completed, but he may make it effective on the date of the completion of the application or any date thereafter requested by the applicant.
( b ) *Numbering.* Each Open Cargo Policy supplied to the underwriting agent by the Maritime Administrator shall be numbered by MARAD before it is supplied to the underwriting agent. No two numbers shall be the same. The underwriting agent when issuing the policy shall add at the end of the policy number the agency number assigned to that underwriting agent, and where policies are issued by more than one office of an underwriting agent, the issuing office shall also be identified in the policy number. For example, policies issued by an office in New York will be designated by “NY” and policies issued in San Francisco will be designated by “SF” prefixed to the underwriting agent's agency number.
# C_2011238EN.01001902.xml

| 13.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/19

---

Action brought on 30 May 2011 — Hotel Reservation Service Robert Ragge v OHIM — Promotora Imperial (iHotel)

(Case T-277/11)

2011/C 238/35

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hotel Reservation Service Robert Ragge GmbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: M. Koch, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Promotora Imperial, SA

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Vary the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 24 February 2011 in Case R 832/2010-1 so as to uphold the main appeal and annul opposition No B 1458571; order the opponent to pay the costs of the opposition and appeal proceedings; uphold the decision as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

—

Vary the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 24 February 2011 in Case R 832/2010-1 so as to uphold the main appeal and annul opposition No B 1458571; order the opponent to pay the costs of the opposition and appeal proceedings; uphold the decision as to the remainder;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs of this action. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs of this action.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Hotel Reservation Service Robert Ragge GmbH.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘iHotel’ for services in Classes 35, 39, 41, 42 and 43 — application No 6912877.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Promotora Imperial, SA

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community word mark ‘i-hotel’ for goods and services in Classes 16, 41 and 43.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in part.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 as there is no likelihood of confusion between the trade marks at issue. The applicant claims that the Board of Appeal was incorrect in holding there to be similarity both between the goods and services concerned and between the trade marks at issue.

Pleas in law:

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000827056
<NAME>                        ZEVEX International
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         8,142,560
<SECURITIES>                                   1,598,032
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,573,181
<ALLOWANCES>                                   138,000
<INVENTORY>                                    5,574,394
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               19,064,979
<PP&E>                                         6,975,770
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,470,127
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 33,760,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,395,946
<BONDS>                                        1,800,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,419
<OTHER-SE>                                     50,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   33,760,979
<SALES>                                        11,084,413
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               11,084,413
<CGS>                                          6,846,443
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,846,443
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4,170,077
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             92,152
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                475,362
<INCOME-TAX>                                   113,169
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            362,193
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   362,193
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .10
        


</TABLE>
§ 5.401 Payment of witness fees and allowances. ( a ) Duly subpoenaed witnesses, other than Federal government employees, may apply for payment of their attendance as witnesses at an investigation or hearing conducted pursuant to this part by submitting a request for payment (Standard Form 1157) accompanied by any necessary receipts.
( b ) Fees and allowances will be paid as provided by 28 U.S.C. 1821, except that a person called to testify as an expert witness may be paid a higher fee to be fixed by the District Commander.
[CGD 82-002, 50 FR 32184, Aug. 9, 1985; 50 FR 35228, Aug. 30, 1985]
SERVED: March 23, 2016 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION .. 

In The Matter Of: 

NORTHEASTERN 

A VIA TI ON CORPORATION 

Respondent 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASIIlNGTON, DC .... ~ 1 .:_ ... · 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0812 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2012EA110028 

. NOTICE OF HEARING LOCATION 

On April 17, 2015 an Order Setting Litigation Dates and Procedures was filed, which 

noted that the location of the Hearing would be provided by separate Notice to the parties. 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Hearing in this case, set to begin on May 4, 2016 at 

9:00 a.m., will be held at the following location: 

United States Tax Court 

Jacob K Javits Federal Building 

Courtroom 208 

26 Federal Plaza 

New York, NY 10278 

The Hearing begins at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. Please allow time to pass 

through security. Brief cases, purses, packages, and the like will be x-rayed. All individuals must 

present government issued identification to enter the courthouse. 

Attachment: Service List 
SERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

Mr. Zachary M. Berman 

Complainant's Counsel 

ONE COPY 

Office of Regional Counsel, Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAJC: 718-995-5699 

Mr. Edward J. Longosz II 

Respondent's Counsel 

Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC 

1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 1200 

Washington, DC 20006 

TEL: 202-659-6619 

F.A:x: 202-659-6699 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (El 1-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FA){: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0812 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 97 (Monday, May 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28524-28525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2548]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Notice of Meeting

    Time and Date: 10 a.m., Thursday, May 24, 2007.
    Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, 
Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.
    Status: Open.
    Matters to be Considered:

[[Page 28525]]

    1. Proposed Rule: Section 701.2 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, 
Federal Credit Union Bylaws.
    2. Proposed Rule: Interpretive Ruling and Policy Statement (IRPS) 
07-1, Section 701.1 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Amendments to 
NCUA's Chartering and Field of Membership Policies.
    3. Final Rule: Part 701 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Technical 
Amendments.
    Recess: 11:15 a.m.
    Time and Date: 11:30 a.m., Thursday, May 24, 2007.
    Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, 
Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.
    Status: Closed.
    Matters to be Considered:
    1. Action under Section 205 of the Federal Credit Union Act. Closed 
pursuant to Exemptions (6), (7), and (8).
    For Further Information Contact: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 07-2548 Filed 5-17-07; 2:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-M
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- ~o;tf, o~t.l Directorate Identifier: 

{fyou make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordinglv. If 

they do not. click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor + u.s. tor U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

8.5 -_)- .... } $0 \ I;_: )II 69 ~l) ~~:. 'II 

11.01 '' l:l ' OtiC I 

I' (.1 " ( II) .... f\ 'I() 

o .• ! I I If) )I HI 

. ('( 'l Ill) \ I I 

' I) (I( ' I I \ I I 'II 

\ Ill' ' l'l ) (I { "' 

It Iii '1.1 I! !' 

' (\ l)f I .. I IV• \ (I l)ll 

() I(' (I ' I 

.,, ' (I I I 

I ' ( ',, 

I "' ' 'J I ' l 

' ft Jl 'll } n. •fJ 

It )I f t 

tJ I( I I 

t) ' ,I { I I. 

(} 1( II ()1 ,, ' I (Ill I) 1)1' ·' Ill ' 

!1 pi () .llt l I 'JI 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $49,853 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

testing, and close- replacement) up) 

I ' I 1ll1 

\ )I \ ' II() 

.-, (,II 

' I tl(j 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 
Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?-

YES* D NOD 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? ~ 

YES*D NOD 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. ~ 

YESD NOD 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? G 

YES*D NOD 

*Explanation: