alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1

FEDERAL REGISTER

[Docket No. CAS

- RM

- 79

- 105]

56 FR 14513

April 10, 1991

Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products; Extension of Compliance Date for Final Rule Regarding Test Procedures and Energy Conservatio n Standards for Water Heaters

SUMMARY: On February 14, 1991, the Gas Appliance Manufacturers Association (GAMA) petitioned the Department of Energy (DOE) on behalf of 15 manufacturers to extend the compliance date of the Final Rule regarding test proc edu res and energy conservation standards for water heaters published in the Federal Register on October 17, 1990 (55 FR 42162). Today's notice publishes a letter granting an extension of the compliance date for those manufacturers from April 15, 1991, to Octo ber 15, 1991.

Issued in Washington, DC, April 3, 1991.

TEXT: J. Michael Davis,

Assistant Secretary, Conservation and Renewable Energy.

Mr. Frank A. Stanonik,

Associate Director of Technical Services,

Gas Appliance Manufacturers Association,

1901 North Moore Street,

Arlington, VA 22209

Dear Mr. Stanonik: The Department of Energy (DOE) has received the letter dated February 14, 1991, from the Gas Appliance Manufacturers Association (GAMA). GAMA, on behalf of 15 water heater manufacturers, re quested an extension of the effective date of the final rule regarding test procedures and energy conservation standards for water heaters published in the Federal Register on October 17, 1990. 55 FR 42162. The letter states that because of the time requir ed for manufacturers to reconfigure their test facilities, the length of time required to conduct each test, and the large number of models to be tested, the manufacturers will be unable to complete the tests by April 15, 1991.

DOE has reviewed this inform ation and agrees that the revised test procedures represent a significant test burden that manufacturers cannot reasonably complete by April 15, 1991. Furthermore, DOE notes that extending the effective date of this final rule will not result in any loss o f energy savings since test procedures provide a standard measurement of energy efficiency and all water heaters will be required to meet applicable energy conservation standards.

Therefore, after reviewing the above, DOE is extending the effective date fr om April 15, 1991, to October 15, 1991, for the manufacturers listed in Appendix A of this letter.Page 2

56 FR 14513

Sincerely,

J. Michael Davis,

Assistant Secretary, Conservation and Renewable Energy.

Appendix A

American Appliance Mfg. Corporation

Bock Water Heaters

Bradford

- White Corporation

Crispaire Corporation

Energy Utilization Systems, Inc.

Ford Products Corporation

GSW Water Heating Company Ltd.

Heat Transfer Products, Inc.

Mor

- Flo Industries, Inc.

Rheem Manufacturing Company

-- Water Heater Division

A. O. Smith Water Products Co.

State Industries, Inc.

Therma

- Star Products Group

-- DEC International

Vaughn Manufacturing Company

Water Heater Innovations [FR Doc. 91

- 8453 Filed 4

- 9

- 91; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450

- 01

- M
§ 401.211 Requirements for training of Applicant Pilots. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76348 , Sept. 17, 2024.
( a ) The Director shall determine the number of Applicant Pilots required to be in training by each Association authorized to form a pool in order to assure an adequate number of Registered Pilots. No Applicant Pilot shall be selected for training unless: ( 1 ) The individual meets the requirements and qualifications set forth in paragraphs (a) (1) through (4), (6), (7), and (9) of § 401.210.
( 2 ) The individual shall not have reached the age of 60.
( 3 ) The individual possesses a radar observer competency certificate or equivalent U.S. Coast Guard endorsement.
( b ) For purpose of determining whether an applicant meets the experience requirements contained in § 401.210(a)(1), not more than twelve months of “comparable experience” may be used in fulfilling the twenty-four month experience requirement.
( c ) The Director shall approve the United States Registered Pilots that are designated by the authorized pilot organization to provide training to those pilots that are in training to be registered pilots.
( d ) Persons desiring to be considered as an Applicant Pilot shall file with the Director a completed Application Form, CG-4509, with two full-face photographs, 11 ⁄ 2 inches by 2 inches, signed on the face.
( e ) Individuals selected as Applicant Pilots by the Director shall be issued a U.S. Coast Guard Applicant Pilot Identification Card, which shall be valid until such time as ( 1 ) the applicant is registered as a pilot under § 401.210;
( 2 ) the applicant withdraws from the training program, or
( 3 ) upon withdrawal by the Director.
[29 FR 10465, July 28, 1964] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 401.211, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
-UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRlCT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

RYAN BOSHAW, 

Plaintiff, 

Case No. 2:15-cv-12356- TLL-PTM 

-vs.- Hon. Thomas L. Ludington 

CBM SERVICES, INC. 

A Michigan Corporation, 

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, 

a Georgia corporation, and 

TRANS UNION, LLC, 

a Delaware limited liability company, 

Defendants. 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT WITH DEFENDANT
 

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC
 

Plaintiff and Defendant, Equifax Information Services, LLC, have agreed to 

settle this lawsuit and intend to file a Stipulation of Dismissal as to Equifax 

Information Services, LLC, with prejudice, no later than October 12,2015. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Gary Nitzkin 

GARY D. NITZKIN (P4l155) 

Michigan Consumer Credit Lawyers 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

22142 West Nine Mile Road 

Southfield, MI 48033 

(248) 353-2882 

gary@micreditlawyer.com 

September 11, 2015. 

Case 1:15-cv-12356-TLL-PTM ECF No. 21 filed 09/23/15 PageID.127 Page 1 of 2
PROOF OF SERVICE 

I, Amber Gingiloski hereby state that on September 23, 2015, I served a 

copy ofthe within pleading upo all counsel of~rUord via th ECF System. 

·~~~~C

Case 1:15-cv-12356-TLL-PTM ECF No. 21 filed 09/23/15 PageID.128 Page 2 of 2
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Central Federal Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 13, 2007
    /s/ Therese Ann LiutkusTherese Ann Liutkus, CPATreasurer and Chief Financial Officer
§ 401.710 Operating requirements for holders of Certificates of Authorization. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76353 , Sept. 17, 2024.
Each holder of a Certificate of Authorization shall— ( a ) Comply with the terms of any agreement for services by registered pilots on the Great Lakes between an appropriate agency of Canada and the Secretary, his designated agent, or the Director;
( b ) Coordinate on a reciprocal basis its pool operations with pool operations of the Canadian Government, under the “Memorandum of Arrangements, Great Lakes Pilotage, Between the Secretary of Transportation of the United States of America and the Minister of Transport of Canada”, effective July 7, 1970, as amended;
( c ) Provide continuous arrangements and facilities for the efficient dispatching of pilotage service on a first-come, first-serve basis to vessels that give notice of pilotage service requirements to the pilotage dispatch station, except pilots are not required to board a vessel that does not furnish safe boarding facilities;
( d ) Dispatch pilotage service under the terms of its approved working rules as referenced in § 402.320;
( e ) Comply with its working rules approved under § 402.320, except to the extent inconsistent with the dispatch orders of the Director under § 401.720(b);
( f ) Comply with all accounting procedures and the reporting requirements in this chapter; and
( g ) Make available to the Commandant all of its financial and operating records.
[CGD 74-233, 40 FR 41527, Sept. 8, 1975, as amended at 61 FR 5721, Feb. 14, 1996. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 32655, June 25, 1996, and further redesignated and amended by USCG-1998-3976, 63 FR 35139, 35140, June 29, 1998]
Exhibit 18

September 4, 2008

Mentor Graphics Corporation

Portland, Oregon

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have
been furnished with a copy of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mentor Graphics Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2008, and have read the Companys statements contained in Note 4 to the
condensed consolidated financial statements included therein. As stated in Note 4, the Company changed its method of accounting for French research credits from a reduction of income tax expense to a reduction in research and development costs. The
Company states the new accounting treatment is preferable based on its assessment that the French research credits are solely based on the Companys research and development spending within France and can be recovered irrespective of whether
the Company pays income tax in France. In accordance with your request, we have reviewed and discussed with Company officials the circumstances and business judgment and planning upon which the decision to make this change in the method of
accounting was based.

We have not audited any financial statements of the Company as of any date or for any period subsequent to January 31, 2008,
nor have we audited the information set forth in the aforementioned Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements; accordingly, we do not express an opinion concerning the factual information contained therein.

With regard to the aforementioned accounting change, authoritative criteria have not been established for evaluating the preferability of one acceptable method of
accounting over another acceptable method. However, for purposes of the Companys compliance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are furnishing this letter.

Based on our review and discussion, with reliance on managements business judgment and planning, we concur that the newly adopted method of accounting is
preferable in the Companys circumstances.



|                 
|-----------------
|Very truly yours,
|                 
|/S/ KPMG LLP
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1540 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1540

      To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to the 
        dissemination of indecent material on cable television.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 2, 1995

 Mr. Hall of Ohio (for himself and Mr. Smith of New Jersey) introduced 
    the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to the 
        dissemination of indecent material on cable television.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Family Viewing Cable Television Act 
of 1995''.

SEC. 2. DISSEMINATION OF INDECENT MATERIAL ON CABLE TELEVISION SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 71 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 1464 the following:
``Sec. 1464A. Dissemination of indecent material on cable television
    ``(a) Whoever knowingly disseminates any indecent material on any 
channel provided to all subscribers as part of a basic cable television 
package shall be imprisoned not more than two years or fined under this 
title, or both.
    ``(b) As used in this section, the term `basic cable television 
package' means those channels provided by any means for a basic cable 
subscription fee to all cable subscribers, including `basic cable 
service' and `other programming service' as those terms are defined in 
section 602 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 522), but does 
not include separate channels that are provided to subscribers upon 
specific request, whether or not a separate or additional fee is 
charged.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 71 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting 
after the item relating to section 1464 the following new item:

``1464A. Dissemination of indecent material on cable television.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Sylvester Risley, *Respondent, v.*Ira Abbey, *Appellant*.

Judgment reversed, néw trial granted, referee discharged, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Bookes, J.
**Exhibit      32.2**

**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                   | /s/              Richard              Rallo |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|   | Richard                  RalloChief                  Financial Officer |

** **

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings. 

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Science Board Task Force on National Guard and Reserves in the GWOT will meet in closed session on May 15-16, 2007; at the Strategic Analysis Inc., 3601 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA.

The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will: assess the consequences for force structure, morale, and mission capability of deployments of members of the National Guard and the Reserves in the course of the global war on terrorism that are lengthy, frequent, or both.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended ( 5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, the meetings will be closed to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        LCDR Clifton Phillips, USN, Defense Science Board, 3140 Defense Pentagon, Room 3C553, Washington, DC 20301-3140, via e-mail at                         *clifton.phillips@osd.mil,*                         or via phone at (703) 571-0083.                    

Dated: April 27, 2007.

L.M. Bynum,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 07-2176  Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joseph C. Cahill, Director and CFO of PowerCold Corporation (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: June 22, 2005



/s/ Joseph C. Cahill

Joseph C. Cahill

Director and CFO
§ 56.70-5 Material. ( a ) *Filler metal.* All filler metal, including consumable insert material, must comply with the requirements of Section IX of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 56.01-2) and § 57.02-5 of this subchapter.
( b ) *Backing rings.* Backing rings must comply with section 127.2.2. of ASME B31.1 (incorporated by reference; see § 56.01-2).
# C_2011152EN.01003101.xml

| 21.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/31

---

Action brought on 31 March 2011 — Ahoua-N’Guetta and Others v Council

(Case T-193/11)

2011/C 152/55

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Timothée Ahoua-N’Guetta (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire), Jacques André Monoko Daligou (Abidjan), Bruno Walé Ekpo (Abidjan), Félix Tano Kouakou (Abidjan), Hortense Sess (Abidjan); and Joséphine Suzanne Ebah (Abidjan) (represented by: J.-C. Tchikaya, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Forms of order sought

Forms of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | Annul Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011 amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire, and Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire, in so far as they concern the applicants; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011 amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire, and Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire, in so far as they concern the applicants;

| — | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments relied on by the applicants are essentially identical or similar to those submitted in Case T-118/11 Attey v Council

Attey

Council

---
```

[Journal of the House of Representatives, 1995]
[Wednesday, March 15, 1995 (45), Para 45.34 Leave of Absence]
[Page 392]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office, www.gpo.gov]

para.45.34  leave of absence

  By unanimous consent, leave of absence was granted--
  To Mr. HALL of Ohio, for March 14;
  To Miss COLLINS of Michigan, for today after 2:30 p.m.; and
  To Ms. Eddie Bernice JOHNSON of Texas, for today after 7:45 p.m.
  And then,
```