alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 84 (Friday, May 1, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25000-25001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10231]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9123]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Highlights of the Keir Collection of Art of the 
Islamic World'' and Related Keir Collection Exhibitions

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to

[[Page 25001]]

the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 
985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 
2003), I hereby determine that objects to be included in the 
``Highlights of the Keir Collection of Art of the Islamic World'' and 
related Keir Collection exhibitions, imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign 
owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of 
the exhibit objects at the Dallas Museum of Art, Dallas, TX, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, from on 
about September 18, 2015, until on or about May 4, 2020, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the objects covered under this notice, contact the Office of 
Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs in the Office of the Legal Adviser, 
U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email: 
section2459@state.gov). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: April 24, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-10231 Filed 4-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 41352 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. FRANCISCO NOE VILLELA

- RAMIREZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:16

- CR

- 605

- 1

Before SMITH , CLEMENT , and COSTA , Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco Noe Villela

- Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Villela

- Ramirez h a s no t filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 20 , 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-41352 Document: 00514040109 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2017No. 16

- 41352

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for le ave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-41352 Document: 00514040109 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2017
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Network Documentation & Implementation, 

Inc.

)

)

ASBCA No. 61804

)

Under Contract No. 000000-00-0-0000 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Andrew Gillman, Esq.

 Whitcomb, Selinksy, PC

 Denver, Colorado

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: William E. Brazis, Jr., Esq.

 DISA General Counsel

Maj Ryan P. Payne, USAF

Andriani Buck, Esq.

 Trial Attorneys

 Defense Information Systems Agency

 Ft. Meade, MD

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: April 20, 2022

ELIZABETH WITWER

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals
2

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61804, Appeal of Network 

Documentation & Implementation, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s 

Charter.

Dated: April 20, 2022

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## A IR 

## F ORCE 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS



### U N ITED STATES ) No. ACM 40418 Appellee ) )

v. ) ) ORDER Rusty C. THOMAS ) Captain (O

- 3 ) )

U.S. Air Force ) Appellant ) Panel 1

On 2 April 2024

, Appellant submitted a Motion to Withdraw from Appellant Review and Motion to Attach. Specifically, Appellant moved to attach a

DD Form 2330, Waiver/Withdrawal of Appellate Rights in General and Special

Courts

- Martial Subject to Review by a Court of Criminal Appeals , signed by
Appellant and Appellant’s counsel on 1 April 2024

. The Government did not submit any opposition.

Accordingly, it is by the court on this 5th day of April 2024,

ORDERED:

Appellant’s Motion to Withdraw from Appellate Review and Motion to Attach are GRANTED. Appellant’s case is forwarded to the Appellate Records
Branch (JAJM) for further processing in accordance with Rules for Courts

Martial 1115(f)(3) and 1201, Manual for Courts

- Martial, United States (2024
ed.).

FOR THE COURT

FLEMING E. KEEFE

, Capt , USAF Deputy Clerk of the Court
§ 401.320 Requirements and qualifications for authorization to establish pools. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76350 , Sept. 17, 2024.
No voluntary association shall be authorized to establish a pool unless: ( a ) The Director determines that a pool is necessary for the efficient dispatching of vessels and the providing of pilotage services in the area concerned.
( b ) The stock, equity, or other financial interests coupled with voting rights or exercise of any right of control in the management of the voluntary association is held only by member Registered Pilots registered pursuant to § 401.200, § 401.210, or § 401.220(e), excluding Applicant Pilots.
( c ) The voluntary association establishes that it possesses the ability, experience, financial resources, and other qualifications necessary to enable it to operate and maintain an efficient and effective pilotage service.
( d ) The voluntary association agrees that: ( 1 ) Pilotage services will be provided on a first-come, first-serve basis to vessels giving proper notice of arrival time or pilotage service requirements, to the pilotage station, except that pilots will not be required to board vessels which do not provide safe boarding facilities;
( 2 ) It will submit working rules for approval of the Commandant;
( 3 ) It will adopt and use the Uniform System of Accounts, part 403 of this chapter, and such other accounting procedures and reports as may be prescribed by the Commandant;
( 4 ) It will be subject to audit and inspection by the U.S. Coast Guard and will submit by April 1 of each year an unqualified long form audit report for the preceding year prepared by an Independent Certified Public Accountant, performed in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards promulgated by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
( 5 ) It will be subject to such other provisions as may be prescribed by the Director governing the operation of and the costs which may be charged in connection with the pools;
( 6 ) It will coordinate on a reciprocal basis its pool operations with similar pool arrangements established by the Canadian Government and pursuant to the provisions of the United States-Canada Memorandum of Arrangements, Great Lakes Pilotage, or any other arrangements established by the United States and Canadian Governments.
[29 FR 10466, July 28, 1964, as amended at 31 FR 9066, July 1, 1966; 32 FR 14221, Oct. 13, 1967; CGD 81-088, 47 FR 13808, Apr. 1, 1982; CGD 88-111, 55 FR 17581, Apr. 25, 1990; 61 FR 5721, Feb. 14, 1996. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 32655, June 25, 1996, and further redesignated and amended by USCG-1998-3976, 63 FR 35139, 35140, June 29, 1998]
#### THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. CHARLES AGNEW, Jr., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.

Argued May 7, 1929

Decided October 21, 1929.

*916Before Gummeee, Chief Justice, and Justices Kalisch and Campbell.

Eor the defendant in error, *Louis A. Repetto.*

Eor the plaintiff in error, *Ulysses G. Styron.*

Pee Cueiam.

The plaintiff in error was charged under three separate indictments as follows:

Under No. 10823, in two counts, with atrocious assault and battery and assault with intent to rob Kathryn A. Stilz on December 2d, 1927; under No. 10825 with breaking and entering by night, breaking and entering by day, and entering without breaking, all and each with intent to steal and receive stolen goods, on December 2d, 1927; and, under No. 10824, with atrocious assault and battery upon Charles B. Stilz, on January 4th, 1928.

Without any action or motion upon the part of the prosecutor and against the objection of the plaintiff in error the trial judge required that the three indictments should be consolidated and the plaintiff in error be tried under all three at the same time. The result of such trial was a conviction of the defendant below under all three and the imposing of sentence.

This judgment is attacked upon the ground, amongst others, that need not be considered, that it was error to consolidate these indictments and require the defendant below to ° stand trial upon all three at one time.

Our conclusion is that this was error requiring a reversal of the judgment, particularly so because the charge under indictment No. 10824 had no bearing upon the crimes alleged and charged under the other two indictments.

The judgment under review is therefore reversed.
#### § 502.133 Attendance and mileage fees.

Witnesses summoned by subpoena to a hearing or deposition are entitled to the same fees and mileage that are paid to witnesses in courts of the United States. Fees and mileage shall be paid, upon request, by the party at whose instance the witness appears. [Rule 133.]

[64 FR 7809, Feb. 17, 1999, as amended at 76 FR 10262, Feb. 24, 2011]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending April 29, 2006

|Filer                              | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                              
|---------------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP | * 3A3          | Enterprise Financial Services Corp., Clayton, Missouri, to acquire 100 percent of NorthStar Bancshares, Inc., North Kansas City, Missouri, and thereby indirectly acquire NorthStar Bank, National Association, North Kansas City, Missouri. | Newspaper:05/19/2006Federal Register:05/22/2006    
|Newspaper:                         | 05/19/2006    
|Federal Register:                  | 05/22/2006    
|FIRST STATE BANK OF ST. ROBERT     | * Branch       | First State Bank of St. Robert, St. Robert, Missouri, to establish a branch facility to be located at 2365 North Highway 17, Iberia, Missouri.                                                                                               | Newspaper:05/10/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                         | 05/10/2006    
|Federal Register:                  | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
**EXHIBIT 99.23****CONSENT OF EXPERT**     Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Cameco Corporation (the“Company”) to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.     I hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name under the heading “Centerra GoldInc. — Reserves and Resources” in the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year endedDecember 31, 2007, dated March 28, 2008 (the “AIF”) and in the 40-F, and to disclosure of ascientific and technical nature pursuant to which I have acted in a supervisory capacity under theheading “Centerra Gold Inc. — Reserves and Resources” of the AIF.     Sincerely,
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2522 

To raise the ceiling on the Federal share of the cost of the Calleguas 

Municipal Water District Recycling Project, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2009 

Mr. GALLEGLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To raise the ceiling on the Federal share of the cost of 

the Calleguas Municipal Water District Recycling 

Project, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That section 1631(d) of the Reclamation Wastewater and 

4 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (43 U.S.C. 390h– 

5 13(d)) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘paragraph 

7 (2)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraphs (2) and (3)’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(3) In the case of the Calleguas Municipal Water 

10 District Recycling Project authorized by section 1616, the 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2522 IH

1 Federal share of the cost of the Project may not exceed 

2 the sum determined by adding— 

3 ‘‘(A) the amount that applies to the Project 

4 under paragraph (1); and 

5 ‘‘(B) $40,000,000.’’. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending July 5, 2008

|Filer                               | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                                  
|----------------------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|EASTERN BANK CORPORATION            | * 3A3          | Eastern Bank Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts to acquire MASSBANK Corp. and its subsidiary bank, MASSBANK, both of Reading, Massachusetts, pursuant to section 3(a)(3) of the BHC Act. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:06/30/2008     
|Newspaper:                          | Not available 
|Federal Register:                   | 06/30/2008    
|STATE STREET INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS | Other Foreign  | To amend Articles of Association                                                                                                                                                         | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                          | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                   | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 5.33 Violation of law or regulation.

Where the proceeding is based exclusively on that part of title 46 U.S.C. section 7703, which provides as a basis for suspension or revocation, a violation or failure to comply with 46 U.S.C. subtitle II, a regulation prescribed under that subtitle, or any other law or regulation intended to promote marine safety or protect navigable waters, the complaint must state the specific statute or regulation by title and section number, and the particular manner in which it was allegedly violated.

[CGD 82-002, 50 FR 32184, Aug. 9, 1985, as amended by USCG-1998-3472, 64 FR 28075, May 24, 1999; USCG-2004-18884, 69 FR 58342, Sept. 30, 2004]
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF
                              SPECIFIED LIABILITIES


THIS  ASSIGNMENT  AND  ASSUMPTION,  made as of the 3rd day of May,  2000, by and
between  AURA  CERAMICS,  INC.,  a Delaware  corporation  ("Seller"),  and ALPHA
CERAMICS, INC., a Minnesota corporation ("Buyer").

WHEREAS,  Buyer,  Seller and Aura Systems,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation,  have
entered into that certain Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of February 29, 2000
(the "Asset Purchase Agreement");

WHEREAS,  the Asset Purchase  Agreement provides that Buyer is to acquire all of
the assets of Seller,  other than the "Retained Assets" (as such term is defined
in Section 2.2 of the Asset Purchase Agreement); and

WHEREAS,  the Asset Purchase  Agreement provides that Buyer is to assume certain
specified  liabilities  of  Seller  as set  forth in  Section  2.3 of the  Asset
Purchase Agreement.

NOW,  THEREFORE,  in consideration of the transactions as described in the Asset
Purchase  Agreement,  and other good and  valuable  consideration,  the receipt,
sufficiency and mutuality of which are hereby  acknowledged,  the parties hereto
hereby agree as follows:

1.  ASSUMPTION.  Buyer hereby assumes and agrees to pay according to their terms
all of the "Assumed Liabilities",  as that term is defined in Section 2.3 of the
Asset Purchase Agreement.

2.  RETAINED  LIABILITIES.  Seller shall remain  unconditionally  liable for all
"Retained  Liabilities",  which  term is  defined  in  Section  2.3 of the Asset
Purchase  Agreement as all  obligations,  liabilities and commitments of Seller,
presently  existing  or  contingent  arising  out  of  events  or  circumstances
occurring  on or prior to the Closing Date (as that term is defined in the Asset
Purchase  Agreement).  Buyer is not  assuming  or agreeing to pay or perform the
Retained  Liabilities  or any other  liabilities,  obligations or commitments of
Seller other than the Assumed Liabilities.

                  [Remainder of page intentionally left blank.]


<PAGE>


                                                          SELLER:

Date: May ___, 2000                                       AURA CERAMICS, INC.


                                                          By:
                                                              Its:

                                                          By:
                                                              Its:


                                                          BUYER:

Date: May ____, 2000                                      ALPHA CERAMICS, INC.


                                                          By:
                                                              James E. Sloane
                                                              Its: President
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

JAJUAN O GARDNER, 

Defendant. 

4:14-CR-20735-TGB 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 

WITHDRAW AND APPOINTING 

FEDERAL COMMUNITY 

DEFENDER OFFICE 

The Court, having reviewed Attorney Bryan Sherer’s motion to 

withdraw in this matter, GRANTS the motion. Further, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Federal Community Defender of the 

Eastern District of Michigan, 111 E. Court Street, SuiteL-100, Flint, 

Michigan 48502, telephone (810) 232-9600, is appointed to represent this 

defendant in this case, unless the appointment is terminated by (1) Order 

of the Court, (2) appointment of substitute counsel, or (3) appearance of 

retained counsel. 

Case 4:14-cr-20735-TGB-MJH ECF No. 37 filed 06/11/20 PageID.171 Page 1 of 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that should this case require the 

assignment of an attorney from the CJA panel, the Federal Community 

Defender of the Eastern District of Michigan is authorized to issue such 

appointment using the electronic system to create the appropriate CJA 

appointment form. CJA Counsel will represent the defendant in this case 

unless the appointment is terminated by (1) Order of the Court, (2) 

appointment of substitute counsel, or (3) appearance of retained counsel. 

This appointment is for the limited purpose of supplementing the 

pending Motion to Amend Judgment to Home Confinement (ECF No. 31). 

The supplement shall be due within 10 days of the date of the appearance 

of counsel, and the government’s response to the supplement, if any, is 

due 7 days after the supplement is filed. 

DATED this 9th day of June, 2020. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/Terrence G. Berg 

TERRENCE G. BERG 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:14-cr-20735-TGB-MJH ECF No. 37 filed 06/11/20 PageID.172 Page 2 of 2