alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 87 (Monday, May 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25782-25783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2231]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Southwest Research Institute (``SwRI''): Clean 
Diesel IV

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 27, 2007, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Southwest Research Institute 
(``SwRI'') Clean Diesel IV has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Chevron Energy Technology Co., San Ramon, 
CA, Hitachi, Ltd., Ibaraki-Ken, JAPAN, and PAS Peugeot Citroen, Cedex, 
FRANCE have become parties to the group research project. In addition, 
ArvinMeritor, Inc., Troy, MI, Norstar Founders Group, Ltd., Causeway 
Bay, HONG KONG-CHINA, and Senior Automotive, Bartlett, IL, are no 
longer parties to this group research project.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and SwRI v intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 6, 2004, SwRI Clean Diesel IV filed its original 
notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 
6(b) of the Act on May 10, 2004 (69 FR 25923).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 28, 
2005. A notice was published in the Federal

[[Page 25783]]

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 13, 2005 (70 FR 
40400).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-2231 Filed 5-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 50259 Su m m ar y Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee v. RI CARDO T OVAR , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e W est ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 5: 07- C R
- 232- 1 B ef ore K IN G , ST E W A R T , an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * T h e a ttorn ey a p p oin ted to rep rese n t R i ca rd o T ov a rh a s m ov ed f or leav e to w i t hdr aw a nd has f

i l e d a br i e f i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d er s v . Ca lif o rn ia , 386 U . S. 73 8 ( 19 67 ) . Tov arha s no tf i l e d a r espon se. Ouri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a n d co u n s e l’ s b r ie f d is c lo s e s n o n o n fr iv o lo u s is s u e fo ra p p e a l. A c c o r d in g ly , co u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo r l e a v e to w ith d r a w is G R A N T E D , co u n s e l is e x c u s e d f

r o m f u r t h e rr e s p o n s ib i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P EA L I S DI S M I S S ED . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 16, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending November 17, 2007

|Filer                        | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                             
|---------------------------- | ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|PRIVATE BANCORPORATION, INC. | CIC           | Notice by Richard Tucker Plumstead Revocable Trust, Richard Tucker Plumstead as trustee and individually; Richard Tucker Plumstead IRA; Vicki L. Turnquist Revocable Trust, Vicki L. Turnquist as trustee and individually; Vicki L. Turnquist IRA; and Vicki L. Turnquist Simplified Employee Pension Plan; all of Minneapolis, Minnesota, as a group acting in concert, to retain 10 percent or more of the shares of Private Bancorporation, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly retain control of Private Bank Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. | Newspaper:12/01/2007Federal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                   | 12/01/2007   
|Federal Register:            | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13a) or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             |                                                                                                            |                                    |
|----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| February                12, 2008 |                                                                                                       |                               |
|                                  |                                                                                                                 | /s/                D. Jonathan Merriman |
|                                  | **D.                Jonathan Merriman*****Chairman                and Chief Executive                Officer*** |

|   |                                                                            |                                |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|        |                                                                                 | /s/                John D. Hiestand |
|   | **John                D. Hiestand*****Chief                Financial Officer*** |

----
JUVENILE COURT PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE

FINAL REPORT1

Amendment of Pa.R.J.C.P. 330, 337, and 515

On February 13, 2019, the Supreme Court amended Rules of Juvenile Court 

Procedure 330, 337, and 515 to update statutory references as a result of the Act of 

June 28, 2018, P.L. 402 concerning the “clean slate” program for limiting public access 

to certain criminal history. The amendment will become effective June 28, 2019 to 

coincide with the effective date of the Act amending 42 Pa.C.S. § 6307.

 

1 The Committee’s Final Report should not be confused with the official Committee 

Comments to the rules. Also note that the Supreme Court does not adopt the 

Committee’s Comments or the contents of the Committee’s explanatory Final Reports.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 A1 47 8 . RODERI CK HARVEY v . THE STATE.

Th e t ri al co u rt rev o k e d t h e b a l an ce o f Ro d eri ck Harv ey ’ s p ro b at i o n fo r

co m m i s s io n o f a n ew fel o ny offen se. Harv ey ’ s co u n s el fi l ed a m o t i o n fo r n ew t ri al

,

wh i ch th e t ri al co u rt d en ied

. Ha r v e y f i l ed a n o t i ce o f ap p eal fro m t h e t ri al co urt ’ s

o rd er. W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

An ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i scret io n a r y ap peal i s req ui red t o ap p eal a p ro b at i o n

rev o cat i on cas e. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (5 ); To d d v. S t a te

, 23 6 Ga. A p p

. 7 5 7 (5 1 3 SE2 d

2 8 7 ) (1 99 9 ); W

el l s v. S t a t e

, 2 3 6 Ga. Ap p

. 6 07

, 6 08 (5 1 2 SE2 d 7 1 1 ) (1 9 9 9) (d en i al o f

m o ti o n fo r n ew t ri al i n a p ro b at i o n rev ocat i o n cas e d o es n ot ch an ge t h e ob l ig at i o n to

fo l l o w d i s c ret io n ary ap p eal p ro ced u res ). H arv ey ’ s fai l u re t o co m p l y wi t h t h e

d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal req u irem en t s dep ri v es t h i s Co u rt o f ju ri s d i ct i o n t o co ns i d er t h i s

ap p eal

. Acco rd i ng l y

, Harv ey ’ s ap p eal is h ereb y DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f j u ri s d i ct i o n

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. May 02, 2017

05/02/2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       5,785,640
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,487,352
<ALLOWANCES>                                   419,967
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,186,755
<PP&E>                                       9,145,850
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,599,964
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,861,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,623,994
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,215,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,861,802
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            41,773,098
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               37,477,216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (338,152)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (93,871)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             238,729
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,634,618
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,634,618
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,634,618
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Proposed label
TwinLinkTM Cotton 

INSECT RESISTANT COTTON SEED 

Insect-resistant cotton seed that produces insecticidal proteins Cry1Ab and 

Cry2Ae from Bacillus thuringiensis. For control of Cotton Bollworm, Tobacco 

Budworm, Pink Bollworm, Fall Armyworm, and Beet Armyworm.

Active Ingredients: 

Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab protein and the genetic material (from plasmid pTDL008) necessary 

for its production in Event T304-40 x GHB119 cotton (BCS-GHØØ4-7 x BCS-GH GHØØ5-8)

....................................................................................................................0.000643 – 0.001176%*

Bacillus thuringiensis Cry2Ae protein and the genetic material (from plasmid pTEM12) necessary 

for its production in Event T304-40 x GHB119 cotton (BCS-GHØØ4-7 x BCS-GH GHØØ5-8)

.................................................................................................0.001648 – 0.005176%*

Inert Ingredient:

Substance produced by a herbicide tolerance gene and its controlling sequences (from plasmids

pTDL008 and pTEM12) necessary for its production in Event T304-40 x GHB119 cotton

(BCS-GHØØ4-7 x BCS-GH GHØØ5-8) ..............................................0.038352 – 0.073077%

______________________________________________________________________________________

* Percentage (wt/wt) on a dry weight basis as expressed in whole cotton plants.

KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN 

CAUTION

EPA REGISTRATION NUMBER: 264-RNOA

EPA ESTABLISHMENT NUMBER: 000264-TX-004

Bayer CropScience

2 T.W. Alexander Dr.

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
DIRECTIONS FOR USE

It is a violation of federal law to use this product in any manner inconsistent with its labeling.

No commercial planting of this product is permitted south of Route 60 in Florida.

Commercial planting of this product is prohibited in Hawaii, Puerto Rico and the US Virgin 

Islands.

Bt cotton is not permitted to be planted in the following counties of the Texas panhandle: Dallam, 

Sherman, Hansford, Ochiltree, Lipscomb, Hartley, Moore, Hutchinson, Roberts and Carlson.

USE PATTERN

CROP PESTS

Cotton Cotton Bollworm

Tobacco Budworm

Pink Bollworm

Beet Armyworm

EPA Accepted: __/__/__
NO. 07-04-0411-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	DECEMBER 10, 2004

	______________________________

	MANUEL RUELAS-SIGALA, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 84TH DISTRICT COURT OF OCHILTREE COUNTY;

	NO. 3802; HONORABLE WILLIAM D. SMITH, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant, Manuel Ruelas-Sigala, appeals a conviction for Indecency with a Child.  We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

	Appellant was tried before a jury on the charge of Indecency with a Child.  He was found guilty.  Sentence was imposed and judgment was signed on April 5, 2004.  Appellant filed a Motion for New Trial and Notice of Appeal.  Notice of Appeal was filed on July 29, 2004.  No motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal was filed.  Subsequently, appellant filed a Motion for Out of Time Appeal.  

	In a criminal case, appeal is perfected by timely filing a notice of appeal.  Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b).1  If a motion for new trial is timely filed, then the notice of appeal must be filed within 90 days after the day sentence is imposed or after the day the trial court enters an appealable order.  TRAP  26.2(a). 

	An untimely-filed notice of appeal will not invoke the jurisdiction of the court of appeals.  See State v. Riewe, 13 S.W.2d 408, 411 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000).  If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not have jurisdiction and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal.  Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998).

	Appellant’s Notice of Appeal was not timely filed and does not invoke our jurisdiction.  We have no jurisdiction to consider or act on appellant’s Motion for Out of Time Appeal.   

	The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  TRAP 39.8, 40.2, 43.2. 	 				

								Per Curiam

Do not publish.
# C_2014102EN.01002801.xml

| 7.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/28

---

Order of the President of the Court of 22 November 2013 — European Commission v Hungary

(Case C-462/12) (1)

1

2014/C 102/38

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 379, 8.12.2012.

1

---
#### § 35.35-10 Closing of freeing-ports, scuppers, and sea valves—TB/ALL.

The person in charge of each transfer of liquid cargo in bulk shall ensure that all freeing-ports and scuppers are properly plugged during the transfer except on tank vessels using water for cooling decks. Although under no circumstances may sea valves be secured by locks, the valves must be closed, and lashed or sealed, to indicate that they should not be opened during the transfer.

[CGD 79-116, 60 FR 17156, Apr. 4, 1995]
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-03703, 333-27009, 333-28147, 333-53667, 333-85791, 333-36478, 333-40038, 333-43838, 333-67868, 333-85884, 333-109314, 333-115143 and 333-132473) on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-132663, 333-96341, 333-31342,333-127722 333-59106 and 333-49180) on Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement Nos. 333-132663, 333-127722 and 333-59106, and on Amendments No. 2 and No. 3 to Registration Statement No. 333-59106, of our reports datedMarch 30, 2007 relating to (1) the consolidated financial statements of i2 Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the change in the method ofaccounting for stock based payments to conform to FASB Statement No. 123(R), *Share-Based Payment*), and (2) management's report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report onForm 10-K of i2 Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

***DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP***

**Dallas, Texas**

**March 30, 2007**
§ 44.05-25 Freeboards. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) When the assigning authority is satisfied that the requirements of this part as applicable to the type of vessel under consideration are complied with the freeboards will be computed as described in this section.
( 2 ) The requirements in §§ 42.09-1 and 42.09-10 that relate to the assignment of freeboards and to stability are applicable to each vessel subject to the requirements in this part.
( 3 ) The assigning authority that assigns a vessel subject to the requirements in this part a freeboard under part 45 of this chapter shall do so in accordance with the requirements in effect as of October 1, 1972.
( b ) *Steam colliers.* Steam colliers that have constructional features similar to those of a tanker which afford extra invulnerability against the sea may be assigned a reduction of freeboard from that determined under part 42 of this subchapter. The amount of such reduction shall be determined by the assigning authority, in relation to the freeboard assigned to tankers, having regard to the degree of compliance with the supplementary conditions of assignment laid down for these ships, but without regard to the degree of subdivision provided. The freeboard assigned to such a vessel shall in no case be less than would be assigned the vessel as a tanker, as determined under part 42 of this subchapter.
( c ) *Towed cargo barges with cargo under deck.* The freeboard is to be computed under §§ 45.15-1 to 45.15-97 of this subchapter. The fresh water and seasonal markings where applicable are to be determined under part 42 of this subchapter.
( d ) *Towed cargo barges with cargo only on deck.* The freeboard for barges of this type is to be computed in accordance with the requirements of §§ 45.20-1 to 45.20-70 of this subchapter. The fresh water and seasonal markings where applicable are to be the same as determined under part 42 of this subchapter.
( e ) *Towed cargo barges of the open type.* The load line shall be placed where, in the judgment of the assigning authority, the draft will be such that no unusual hazard will be experienced. In general, drafts assigned will be such that the barge will remain afloat with a reasonable freeboard after flooding of the net available open space.
( f ) *Towed tank barges.* The freeboard is to be computed in accordance with §§ 45.20-1 to 45.20-70 of this subchapter. The fresh water and seasonal markings where applicable are to be determined under part 42 of this subchapter.
( g ) *Self-propelled cargo barges.* The freeboard is to be computed under §§ 45.15-1 to 45.20-15 of this subchapter. The fresh water and seasonal markings where applicable are to be determined under part 42 of this subchapter.
( h ) *Self-propelled tank barges.* The freeboard is to be computed in accordance with §§ 45.20-1 to 45.20-70 of this subchapter. The fresh water and seasonal markings where applicable are to be determined under part 42 of this subchapter.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 17655, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10077, July 12, 1968; CGD 73-49R, 38 FR 12290, May 10, 1973]
§ 502.305 Applicability of other rules of this part. ( a ) Except otherwise specifically provided in this subpart or in paragraph (b) of this section, the sections in subparts A through Q, inclusive, of this part do not apply to situations covered by this subpart.
( b ) The following sections in subparts A through Q of this part apply to situations covered by this subpart: §§ 502.2(a) (Requirement for filing); 502.2(f)(1) (Email transmission of filings); 502.2(i) (Continuing obligation to provide contact information); 502.7 (Documents in foreign languages); 502.21 through 502.23 (Appearance, Authority for representation, Notice of appearance; substitution and withdrawal of representative); 502.43 (Substitution of parties); 502.101 (Computation); 502.113 (Service of private party complaints); 502.117 (Certificate of service); 502.253 (Interest in reparation proceedings); and 502.254 (Attorney fees in complaint proceedings). [Rule 305.]
[76 FR 10262, Feb. 24, 2011, as amended at 80 FR 14319, Mar. 19, 2015; 81 FR 10519, Mar. 1, 2016]