alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013225EN.01005102.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/51

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 June 2013 — Veolia Acqua Compagnia Generale delle Acque srl, in liquidation v European Commission, Italian Republic

(Case C-436/12 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - State aid - Aid to undertakings established in the territory of Venice and Chioggia)

2013/C 225/91

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Veolia Acqua Compagnia Generale delle Acque srl, in liquidation (represented by: A. Vianello, A. Bortoluzzi and A. Veglianiti, avvocati)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, G. Conte and D. Grespan, acting as Agents), Italian Republic

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 July 2012 in Case T-264/00 Compagnia Generale delle Acque v Commission, by which that court dismissed an action for annulment of Commission Decision 2000/394/EC of 25 November 1999 on aid to firms in Venice and Chioggia by way of relief from social security contributions under Laws No 30/1997 and 206/1995 (OJ 2000 L 150, p. 50) — Whether intra Community trade is affected — Impact on competition — Extent of control — Burden of proof — Duty to state reasons

Compagnia Generale delle Acque

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Veolia Acqua Compagnia Generale delle Acque srl shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Veolia Acqua Compagnia Generale delle Acque srl shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 379, 8.12.2012.

1

---
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                    906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Atrion
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 14, 2002                  /s/ Emile A. Battat
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Emile A. Battat
                                        Chief Executive Officer

      The foregoing certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350 and not for any other purpose.
#### Office of Disciplinary Counsel *v.*Harris.

[Cite as *Disciplinary Counsel v. Harris*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 3.]

(No. 98-719

Submitted July 8, 1998

Decided November 10, 1998.)

*4
      *Jonathan E. Coughlan,*Disciplinary Counsel, for relator. *Paula Castle Harris, pro se.*

*Per Curiam.*

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
§ 196.30-10 Notice required before repair. ( a ) No repairs or alterations, except in an emergency, shall be made to any lifesaving or fire detecting or extinguishing equipment without advance notice to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection. When emergency repairs or alterations have been made, notice shall be given to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, as soon as practicable.
§ 295.40 Administrative determinations. ( a ) *Policy.* A Contractor who disagrees with the findings, interpretations or decisions of the Contracting Officer with respect to the administration of this part may submit an appeal to the Maritime Administrator. Such appeals shall be made in writing to the Maritime Administrator, within 60 days following the date of the document notifying the Contractor of the administrative determination of the Contracting Officer. Such an appeal should be addressed to the Maritime Administrator, Att.: MSP Contract Appeals, Maritime Administration, 400 Seventh St., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20590.
( b ) *Process.* The Maritime Administrator may require the person making the request to furnish additional information, or proof of factual allegations, and may order any proceeding appropriate in the circumstances. The decision of the Maritime Administrator shall be final.
Case 2:15-cv-11520-MAG-APP ECF No. 9, PageID.38 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 1
IIB 

★(Star Print)

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2470 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 17, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 19190 Cochran Boulevard FRNT in Port 

Charlotte, Florida, as the ‘‘Lieutenant Commander Roy 

H. Boehm Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2470 RFS1S 

1 SECTION 1. LIEUTENANT COMMANDER ROY H. BOEHM 

2 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 19190 Cochran Boulevard 

5 FRNT in Port Charlotte, Florida, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘Lieutenant Commander Roy H. Boehm 

7 Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lieutenant Com12 mander Roy H. Boehm Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 16, 2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

ELEKTA LTD., and 

WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., 

Defendant. 

Case No.: 2:15-cv-12169-AC-MKM 

Hon. Avern Cohn 

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS

I, J. Michael Huget, hereby certify that as of September 28, 2015, my 

mailing address and contact information is as follows: 

J. Michael Huget 

Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP 

315 East Eisenhower Parkway 

Suite 100 

Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108 

Phone: 734-418-4254 

Fax: 734-418-4255 

Email: mhuget@honigman.com

2:15-cv-12169-AC-MKM Doc # 16 Filed 10/07/15 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 246
 2 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: __/s/ J. Michael Huget 

 J. Michael Huget (P39150) 

Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP 

315 East Eisenhower Parkway 

Suite 100 

Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108 

Phone: 734-418-4254 

Fax: 734-418-4255 

Email: mhuget@honigman.com

2:15-cv-12169-AC-MKM Doc # 16 Filed 10/07/15 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 247
 3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A copy of the foregoing Notice of Change of Address was filed 

electronically with the Court on October 7, 2015. Notice of this filing was sent to 

all parties by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system. 

/s/ J. Michael Huget_________________ 

J. Michael Huget (P39150) 

Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP 

315 East Eisenhower Parkway 

Suite 100 

Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108 

Phone: 734-418-4254 

Fax: 734-418-4255 

Email: mhuget@honigman.com

2:15-cv-12169-AC-MKM Doc # 16 Filed 10/07/15 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 248
§ 502.144 Depositions by written questions. ( a ) *When a deposition may be taken.* ( 1 ) *Without leave.* A party may, by written questions, depose any person, including a party, without leave of the presiding officer except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section. The deponent's attendance may be compelled by subpoena under subpart I of this part.
( 2 ) *With leave.* A party must obtain leave of the presiding officer, if the parties have not stipulated to the deposition and: ( i ) The deposition would result in more than 20 depositions being taken under this rule or § 502.143 by any party;
( ii ) The deponent has already been deposed in the case.
( 3 ) *Service; required notice.* A party who wants to depose a person by written questions must serve them on every other party, with a notice stating, if known, the deponent's name and address. If the name is unknown, the notice must provide a general description sufficient to identify the person or the particular class or group to which the person belongs. The notice must also state the name or descriptive title and the address of the officer before whom the deposition will be taken.
( 4 ) *Questions directed to an organization.* A public or private corporation, a partnership, an association, or a governmental agency may be deposed by written questions in accordance with § 502.143(b)(6).
( 5 ) *Questions from other parties.* Any questions to the deponent from other parties must be served on all parties as follows: Cross-questions, within 14 days after being served with the notice and direct questions; redirect questions, within 7 days after being served with cross-questions; and recross-questions, within 7 days after being served with redirect questions. The presiding officer may, for good cause, extend or shorten these times.
( b ) *Delivery to the officer; officer's duties.* The party who noticed the deposition must deliver to the officer before whom the deposition will be taken a copy of all the questions served and of the notice. The officer must promptly proceed to: ( 1 ) Take the deponent's testimony in response to the questions;
( 2 ) Prepare and certify the deposition; and
( 3 ) Send it to the party, attaching a copy of the questions and of the notice.
( c ) *Notice of completion or filing.* ( 1 ) *Completion.* The party who noticed the deposition must notify all other parties when it is completed.
( 2 ) *Filing.* A party who files the deposition must promptly notify all other parties of the filing. [Rule 204.]
[77 FR 61529, Oct. 10, 2012. Redesignated at 81 FR 93836, Dec. 22, 2016; 81 FR 93837, Dec. 22, 2016]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending July 8, 2006

|Filer                         | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|BRYAN FAMILY MANAGEMENT TRUST | * 3A3         | Bryan Family Management Trust and Bryan Heritage Limited Partnership, both of Bryan, Texas, to acquire additional shares up to 51% of The First National Bank of Bryan, Bryan, Texas. | Newspaper:07/28/2006Federal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                    | 07/28/2006   
|Federal Register:             | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000825999
<NAME>                        Precious Metal Mines, Inc.

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                    0
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                        20,750
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     20,750
<PP&E>                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       20,750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                40,916
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             41,657
<OTHER-SE>                          128,833
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         20,750
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          0
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     25,151
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (25,151)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        (25,151)
<EPS-BASIC>                            (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.01)



</TABLE>
#### The State ex rel. Martin, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Martin v. Indus. Comm.*(1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 361.]

(No. 98-1069

Submitted November 10, 1998

Decided January 20, 1999.)

*Larrimer & Larrimer*and *David H. Swanson,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *C. Bradley Howenstein,*for appellee Industrial Commission.

*Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, L.L.P., Brett L. Miller, Richard A. Hernandez*and *Michael L. Williams,*for appellee Lancaster Fairfield Community Hospital.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed. The cause is returned to the Industrial Commission for relief consistent with *State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm*(1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I dissent and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 In connection with the Annual Report of Aura Systems, Inc. (the "Company")  on Form 10-K/A for the period ended February 28, 2002 as filed with the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Neal F.  Meehan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company  for the periods indicated.

  /s/ Neal F. Meehan  ------------------  Neal F. Meehan  Chairman & Chief Executive Officer  January 9, 2004
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending November 10, 2007

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WANDA JEAN BICKERSTAFF,

Plaintiff, Case Number 15-10917

Honorable David M. Lawson

Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti

v. 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AFFIRMING DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER 

AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE

Presently before the Court is the report issued on July 15, 2016 by Magistrate Judge Anthony

P. Patti pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that the Court grant the defendant’s motion

for summary judgment, deny the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and affirm the decision

of the Commissioner. Although the report stated that the parties to this action could object to and

seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, no objections have

been filed thus far. The parties’ failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives

any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th

Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the Court from

its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However,

the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [dkt.

#18] is ADOPTED.

2:15-cv-10917-DML-APP Doc # 19 Filed 08/05/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 672
It is further ORDERED that the defendant’s motion for summary judgment [dkt. #17] is

GRANTED.

It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment [dkt. #13] is

DENIED.

It is further ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.

It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

s/David M. Lawson 

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

Dated: August 5, 2016

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on August 5, 2016.

s/Susan Pinkowski 

SUSAN PINKOWSKI

-2-

2:15-cv-10917-DML-APP Doc # 19 Filed 08/05/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 673
Editorial Note on Part 515
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 515 appear at 67 FR 39860, June 11, 2002, and 70 FR 7669, Feb. 15, 2005.

§ 515.25 Filing of proof of financial responsibility. ( a ) *Filing of proof of financial responsibility* — ( 1 ) *Licenses.* Upon notification by the Commission that an applicant has been conditionally approved for licensing, the applicant shall file with the Director of the Commission's Bureau of Certification and Licensing, proof of financial responsibility in the form and amount prescribed in § 515.21. No license will be issued until the Commission is in receipt of valid proof of financial responsibility.
( 2 ) *Registrations.* A registration shall not become effective until the applicant has furnished proof of financial responsibility pursuant to § 515.21, has submitted a Form FMC-1, and its published tariff becomes effective pursuant to 46 CFR part 520.
( b ) *Optional bond rider.* Any NVOCC as defined in § 515.2(m)(2), in addition to a bond meeting the requirements of § 515.21(a)(2) or (3), may obtain and file with the Commission proof of an optional bond rider, as provided in Appendix E or Appendix F of this part.
[80 FR 68736, Nov. 5, 2015, as amended at 84 FR 62468, Nov. 15, 2019]
§ 50.25-7 Testing of products required to be certified in presence of marine inspector. ( a ) Certified products are not normally tested in the presence of a marine inspector. The Commandant may, however, assign a marine inspector to witness tests required by the applicable specifications to ensure that the requirements are met.
( b ) Marine inspectors must have free entry at all times to those parts of the plant where material subject to this subchapter is being manufactured. The manufacturer must provide marine inspectors all reasonable facilities to satisfy them that the material is being manufactured in accordance with the requirements of the Commandant.
( c ) Unless otherwise authorized, required tests and inspections described in applicable specifications must be made at the place of manufacture prior to shipment.
[USCG-2020-0634, 89 FR 50094, June 12, 2024]
§ 28.330 Galley hood and other fire protection equipment. ( a ) Each vessel must be fitted with a grease extraction hood complying with UL 710 above each grill, broiler, and deep fat fryer.
( b ) Each grease extraction hood must be equipped with a pre-engineered dry or wet chemical fire extinguishing system meeting the applicable sections of NFPA 17 or 17A and must be listed by an independent laboratory.
( c ) A vessel 79 feet (24 meters) or more in length must have at least one fire axe located in or adjacent to the operating station.
#### § 502.14 Public hearings.

The Commission may call informal public hearings, not required by statute, to be conducted under the rules in this part where applicable, for the purpose of rulemaking or to obtain information necessary or helpful in the determination of its policies or the carrying out of its duties, and may require the attendance of witnesses and the production of evidence to the extent permitted by law. [Rule 141.]

[49 FR 44369, Nov. 6, 1984. Redesignated at 81 FR 93836, Dec. 22, 2016]
§ 34.01-1 Applicability—TB/ALL, preemptive effect. ( a ) The provisions of this part shall apply to all tank vessels except as otherwise noted in this part.
( b ) The regulations in this part have preemptive effect over State or local regulations in the same field.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16694, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGD 88-032, 56 FR 35821, July 29, 1991; USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33873, June 7, 2012]