alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 204.9 Indemnity or contribution. ( a ) *Sought by the United States.* If a claim arises under circumstances in which the United States is entitled to indemnity or contribution under a contract or the applicable law governing joint tort-feasors, the Chief Counsel of the Maritime Administration shall notify the third party of the claim and request the third party to honor its obligation to the United States or to accept its share of joint liability. If the issue of third party indemnity or contribution is not satisfactorily adjusted, the underlying claim shall be settled only after consultation with the Department of Justice as provided in 28 CFR 14.7
( b ) *Sought from the United States.* Claims for indemnity or contribution from the United States shall be settled under this part only if the incident giving rise to liability and the claim is otherwise cognizable under this part.
#### § 4.09-1 Commandant to designate.

If it appears that it would tend to promote safety of life and property at sea or would be in the public interest, the Commandant may designate a Marine Board of Investigation to conduct an investigation.

[CGD 76-170, 45 FR 77441, Nov. 24, 1980]
#### § 42.05-20 Commandant.

This term means the Commandant (CG-ENG), Attn: Office of Design and Engineering Systems, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509.

[CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10051, July 12, 1968, as amended by CGD 88-070, 53 FR 34534, Sept. 7, 1988; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60147, Sept. 30, 2013]
H. R. 2422 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2300 Scenic 

Drive in Georgetown, Texas, as the ‘‘Kile G. West Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. KILE G. WEST POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 2300 Scenic Drive in Georgetown, Texas, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Kile G. West Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Kile G. West Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### John W. Brown, *Appellant, v.*Charles Carroll Smith and Richard Boldridge, *Respondents*.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
#### Albert F. Gladding, Executor, etc., Appellant, *v.*Louisa F. Follett, *Respondent.*

Decree affirmed, with costs, against appellant personally. Mem. by

Learned, P. J.
# C_2012049EN.01003302.xml

| 18.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/33

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 15 December 2011 — Maxima Grupė v OHIM — Bodegas Maximo (MAXIMA PREMIUM)

(Case T-523/11) (1)

1

2012/C 49/60

Language of the case: English

The President of the General Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 355, 3.12.2011.

1

---
#### § 308.538 General.

The Maritime Administrator is prepared to provide facultative war risk insurance policies covering any cargoes described in § 308.501 which are designated by an applicant prior to the attachment of risks, if the applicant does not have an Open Cargo Policy issued by the Maritime Administrator, or if he has a shipment which is not covered by his Open Cargo Policy. However, a person with regular shipments is urged to avail himself of the advantages of the automatic coverage of an Open Cargo Policy. The Maritime Administrator reserves the right to decline to quote rates or bind insurance on shipments of cargo that could be covered by an Open Cargo Policy unless the applicant can show to the satisfaction of the Maritime Administrator that the risk is not one of a series of similar risks forming part of a continual flow of business for the applicant. The policy will be in the standard form of War Risk Facultative Cargo Policy, Form MA-316, prescribed in § 308.545. All policies shall be issued by Underwriting Agents appointed by the Maritime Administrator. All Underwriting Agents shall be domestic insurance companies authorized to do a marine insurance business in a State of the United States.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) PROMULGATED

UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

I, Douglas T. Watson , certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Digital Video Systems, Inc., asamended;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation;and

c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: May 2, 2005 

							/s/ Douglas T. Watson			
						Douglas T. Watson

						President and Acting Chief Financial Officer

						(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
# C_2012098EN.01001002.xml

| 31.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/10

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I (Germany) lodged on 9 December 2011 — Karl Berger v Freistaat Bayern

(Case C-636/11)

2012/C 98/14

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht München I

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Karl Berger

Applicant:

Defendant: Freistaat Bayern

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) preclude rules of national law under which the public may be informed, and may be given the name of the food or animal feed product and of the food or animal feed business under the name or corporate name of which the food or animal feed product was produced or handled or placed on the market, if food that is not injurious to health but is unfit for consumption, particularly food that is nauseating, is or has been placed on the market in significant quantities or if, because of its particular nature, such food has been placed on the market only in small quantities but over a lengthy period of time? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) preclude rules of national law under which the public may be informed, and may be given the name of the food or animal feed product and of the food or animal feed business under the name or corporate name of which the food or animal feed product was produced or handled or placed on the market, if food that is not injurious to health but is unfit for consumption, particularly food that is nauseating, is or has been placed on the market in significant quantities or if, because of its particular nature, such food has been placed on the market only in small quantities but over a lengthy period of time?

1

| 2. | If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative: Would the answer to Question 1 be different if the situation at issue arose prior to 1 January 2007, but at a time at which national law had already been brought into line with Regulation No 178/2002? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative: Would the answer to Question 1 be different if the situation at issue arose prior to 1 January 2007, but at a time at which national law had already been brought into line with Regulation No 178/2002?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety (OJ 2002 L 31, p. 1).

1

---
#### § 502.67 Motion for more definite statement.

If a pleading (including a complaint, counterclaim, crossclaim, or third-party complaint filed pursuant to § 502.62) to which a responsive pleading is permitted is so vague or ambiguous that a party cannot reasonably prepare a response, the party may move for a more definite statement before filing a responsive pleading. The motion must be filed within 15 days of the pleading and must point out the defects complained of and the details desired. If the motion is granted and the order of the presiding officer is not obeyed within 10 days after service of the order or within such time as the presiding officer sets, the presiding officer may strike the pleading to which the motion was directed or issue any other appropriate order. If the motion is denied, the time for responding to the pleading must be extended to a date 10 days after service of the notice of denial. [Rule 67.]
#### A. J. Hand et al. v. The State.

*No. 6492.*

*Decided June 1.*

1. Practice—Recognizance—Amendment.—A bail bond or recognizance which binds the principal absolutely without any condition as to his appearance, and which does *not*bind the sureties, is more onerous than the law requires.

2. Same.—A recognizance can not be amended, *nunc pro tunc,*as to intrinsic matter without notice to both the principal and the sureties.

3. Same.—After amendment for intrinsic defects a recognizance can be forfeited only as an original recognizance, and by the same proceeding.

Appeal from the District Court of Bosque. Tried below before Hon. J. M. Hall.

The recognizance in this case recites the indictment of A. J. Hand for cattle theft, the amount of the recognizance and judgment being five hundred dollars.

*29
      *Lockett & Lockett,*for appellants.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

White, Presiding Judge.

In answer to the scire facias the sureties moved to quash the recognizance because it was more onerous than required by law, in that it bound the principal to pay five hundred dollars absolutely, without any condition as to his appearance, and did not bind the sureties in any sum. The objections to the recognizance were well taken (Wright v. The State, 22 Texas Ct. App., 670), and such seems to have been the opinion of the trial judge, for he proceeded of his own motion from *memoranda*upon his docket and his recollection to amend the recognizance *nunc pro tunc,*so as to cure its intrinsic defects in this regard. This was done without notice to the principal in the recognizance, and over objections of the sureties. The principal was the chief obligor in the recognizance, was directly interested in any matter affecting its validity, and he was entitled to notice of any proposed amendment of it. Without such notice to him it could not be legally amended. Collins v. The State, 16 Texas Ct. App., 274; Madison v. The State, 17 Texas Ct. App., 479; Ellis v. The State, 10 Texas Ct. App., 324; Williams v. Nolan, 58 Texas, 708. After amendment for intrinsic defects the recognizance, as amended, should have been forfeited as an original recognizance and by the same procedure.

Judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed and*remanded.

Judges all present and concurring.
§ 535.802 Service contracts. ( a ) Ocean common carrier agreements may not prohibit or restrict a member or members of the agreement from engaging in negotiations for service contracts with one or more shippers.
( b ) Ocean common carrier agreements may not require a member or members of the agreement to disclose a negotiation on a service contract, or the terms and conditions of a service contract, other than those terms or conditions required by section 8(c)(3) of the Act (46 U.S.C. 40502(d)).
( c ) Ocean common carrier agreements may not adopt mandatory rules or requirements affecting the right of an agreement member or agreement members to negotiate or enter into service contracts.
( d ) An agreement may provide authority to adopt voluntary guidelines relating to the terms and procedures of an agreement member's or agreement members' service contracts if the guidelines explicitly state the right of the members of the agreement not to follow these guidelines.
( e ) Voluntary guidelines shall be submitted to the Director, Bureau of Trade Analysis, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573-0001. Voluntary guidelines shall be kept confidential in accordance with § 535.608 of this part. Use of voluntary guidelines prior to their submission is prohibited.
[69 FR 64414, Nov. 4, 2004, as amended at 74 FR 50729, Oct. 1, 2009]
§ 4.03-40 Public vessels. Public vessel means a vessel that— ( a ) Is owned, or demise chartered, and operated by the U.S. Government or a government of a foreign country, except a vessel owned or operated by the Department of Transportation or any corporation organized or controlled by the Department (except a vessel operated by the Coast Guard or Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation); and
( b ) Is not engaged in commercial service.
[CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51195, Sept. 30, 1997]
EXHIBIT
      32.1










CERTIFICATON PURSUANT
      TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES
      OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the
      undersigned officer of National Penn Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") hereby
      certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
      ended  March 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





Date:
            May
                9, 2008
            
            By:
            /s/
                Glenn E. MoyerName:
            Glenn
                E. MoyerTitle:
            President
                and CEO













The
      foregoing certification is being
      furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and not for any other
      purpose.
Exhibit
32.2








Certification


Pursuant
To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Highlands Bankshares, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2009 to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert M. Little, Jr.,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.














/s/Robert M. Little, Jr.


Robert M.
Little, Jr.


Chief
Financial Officer


April 14,
2010
#### § 502.12 Applicability of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

In proceedings under this part, for situations which are not covered by a specific Commission rule, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will be followed to the extent that they are consistent with sound administrative practice. [Rule 12.]

[58 FR 27210, May 7, 1993, as amended at 64 FR 7807, Feb. 17, 1999]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Victims of Trafficking andViolence Protection Act 2000, trafficking in persons report [electronicresource].**
 
2001 | 2002
 
SuDoc Number:S 1.152:
Item Number:0876-A-12 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000535342
 
January 27, 2020
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending November 24, 2007

|Filer                    | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------------ | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|GATEWAY BANK & TRUST CO. | * Branch       | Gateway Bank & Trust Co., Elizabeth City, North Carolina, proposes to establish a branch at 204 Albemarle Square, Charlottesville, Virginia. | Newspaper:12/03/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:               | 12/03/2007    
|Federal Register:        | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for First Quarter of 2008 (January 1, 2008 - March 31, 2008)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 535.601 Preliminary review-rejection of agreements. ( a ) The Commission shall make a preliminary review of each filed agreement to determine whether the agreement is in compliance with the requirements of the Act and this part and, where applicable, whether the accompanying Information Form is complete or, where not complete, whether the deficiency is adequately explained or is excused by a waiver granted by the Commission under § 535.504.
( b ) ( 1 ) The Commission shall reject any agreement that fails to comply substantially with the filing and Information Form of the Act and this part. The Commission shall notify the filing party in writing of the reason for rejection of the agreement. The original filing, along with any supplemental information or documents submitted, shall be returned to the filing party.
( 2 ) Should a rejected agreement be refiled, the full 45-day waiting period will apply to the refiled agreement.
Exhibit 15.2
  
 (LHMP LOGO)
   June 28, 2010


Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co.


Certified Public Accountants
 A member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
 Tel Aviv, Israel


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-12458, and 333-140809 on Form S-8, and No. 333-161781, on Form F-3, of our report, dated February 2, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Cimatron Gibbs, LLC (not presented separately herein) for the year ended December 31, 2009 appearing in this annual report on Form 20-F of Cimatron Ltd.


-s- lucas, horsfall, murphy & pindroh, llpLucas, Horsfall, Murphy & Pindroh, LLP

Pasadena, California
#### § 201.155 Briefs; request for findings.

The time for filing briefs to the presiding officer, and extensions thereof, shall be fixed by him. The period of time allowed shall be the same for all parties unless the presiding officer, for good cause shown, directs otherwise. Normally there shall be an opening brief by the moving parties, an answering brief by the proponents of a contrary conclusion and a short reply by the moving parties. Briefs and statements of position as authorized, shall be served upon all parties pursuant to subpart D of this part. Briefs shall include a summary of evidence, together with references to exhibit numbers and pages of the transcript, and memoranda of law with appropriate citations of the authorities relied upon. They shall contain proposed findings of fact and conclusions in serially numbered paragraphs.