alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending June 2, 2007

|Filer                        | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                | End of Comment Period                              
|---------------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|DREW BANCSHARES, INC.        | CIC            | Notice by Bennie F. Ryburn, Jr., as sole voting trustee, to retain voting control of Drew Bancshares, Inc's., stock held by the Bennie F. Ryburn Family Trust, all of Monticello, Arkansas.    | Newspaper:06/15/2007Federal Register:Not available 
|Newspaper:                   | 06/15/2007    
|Federal Register:            | Not available 
|FIRST CITIZENS BANK          | * Branch       | First Citizens Bank, Elizabethtown, Kentucky, to establish a branch facility to be located at 638 South Dixie Avenue, Radcliff, Kentucky.                                                      | Newspaper:06/07/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                   | 06/07/2007    
|Federal Register:            | Not applicable
|FIRST STATE BANCSHARES, INC. | * 3A3          | First State Bancshares, Inc., Farmington, Missouri, to acquire 100 percent of Progress Bancshares, Inc., Sullivan, Missouri, and thereby indirectly acquire Progress Bank, Sullivan, Missouri. | Newspaper:06/30/2007Federal Register:06/29/2007    
|Newspaper:                   | 06/30/2007    
|Federal Register:            | 06/29/2007    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-60840 Summary Calendar

FELIPE SOLORZANO-GIRON Petitioner

v. MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A96 046 625
Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Felipe Solorzano-Giron (Solorzano) petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the decision of the immigration judge denying his application for asylum. As Solorzano has not challenged the denial of his request for withholding of removal, any such challenge is abandoned. See Rodriguez v. INS , 9 F.3d 408, 414 n.15 (5th Cir. 1993). United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D September 25, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-60840

2 Solorzano argues that, as a member and leader ofa labor union formed to collect past wagesfrom his employer, TranspacCentral America, he is a member ofa “particular social group” for purposes of an application for asylum. He also argues that the BIA erroneously foreclosed him from refugee status due to his failure to turn to Guatemalan authorities for protection from Transpac’s death threats. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that Solorzano was not a refugee. See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A); 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b); Mwembiev. Gonzales, 443 F.3d 405, 414-15 (5th Cir. 2006); Majd v. Gonzales, 446 F.3d 590, 595 (5th Cir. 2006) ; Chen v. Gonzales, 470 F.3d 1131, 1134 (5th Cir. 2006); Mikhael v. INS , 115 F.3d 299, 302 (5th Cir. 1997); see also In re A-M-E & J-G-U , 24 I. & N. Dec. 69 (BIA 2007). We therefore do not address Solorzano’s second argument. PETITION DENIED.
§ 507.110 Self-evaluation. ( a ) The agency shall, by August 24, 1987, evaluate its current policies and practices, and the effects thereof, that do not or may not meet the requirements of this part, and, to the extent modification of any such policies and practices is required, the agency shall proceed to make the necessary modifications.
( b ) The agency shall provide an opportunity to interested persons, including handicapped persons or organizations representing handicapped persons, to participate in the self-evaluation process by submitting comments (both oral and written).
( c ) The agency shall, until three years following the completion of the self-evaluation, maintain on file and make available for public inspection: ( 1 ) A description of areas examined and any problems identified, and
( 2 ) A description of any modifications made.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending January 5, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 401.222 xxx

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76349, Sept. 17, 2024.
§ 39.1009 Additional tank vessel vapor processing unit requirements—TB/ALL. ( a ) Vapor piping, fitting, valves, flanges, and pressure vessels comprising the construction and installation of a permanent or portable vapor processing unit onboard a tank vessel must meet the marine engineering requirements of 46 CFR chapter I, subchapter F.
( b ) Electrical equipment comprising the construction and installation of a permanent or portable vapor processing unit onboard a tank vessel must meet the electrical engineering requirements of 46 CFR chapter I, subchapter J.
( c ) In addition to complying with the rules of this part, tank vessels with a permanent or portable vapor processing unit must comply with applicable requirements of 33 CFR part 154, subpart P.
( d ) When differences between the requirements for vessels contained in 46 CFR chapter I, subchapters F and J and requirements for facilities contained in 33 CFR part 154, subpart P need to be resolved, the requirements of 46 CFR chapter I, subchapters F and J apply, unless specifically authorized by the Marine Safety Center.
**EXHIBIT
31.1**
  **CERTIFICATION**
  I, John
Stanton, certify that:
  1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of White Knight SST, Inc.;
  2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4. The
small business issuer s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:
  a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer , including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer s disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  c)
disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer s internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer
s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer s fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer s internal control over financial
reporting; and
  5. The
small business issuer s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer s
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the small business issuer s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the small business
issuer s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
  b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting.
   March
      2, 2005/s/
      John StantonName:
      John Stanton
      Title:
      Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                              91
<SECURITIES>                                      1314
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1405
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1098
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           207
<OTHER-SE>                                         100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1405
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3692
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  4704
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1012)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1012)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1012)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1012)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 502.709 Applicability of other rules to this subpart. ( a ) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this subpart or in paragraph (b) of this section, the sections in subparts A through Q, inclusive, of this part do not apply to proceedings covered by this subpart.
( b ) The following sections in subparts A through Q apply to proceedings covered by this subpart: §§ 502.1 through 502.11, 502.13 (Filing requirements, Document requirements, and General rules); 502.21 through 502.23 (Appearance, Authority for representation, Notice of appearance, Substitution, and Withdrawal of representative); 502.42 (Bureau of Enforcement); 502.43 (Substitution of parties); 502.101 through 502.105 (Computation of time); 502.114, 502.116 through 502.117 (Service of documents); 502.223 through 502.230 (Decisions). [Rule 709.]
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Gross, Appellee.

[Cite as *State v. Gross*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 42.]

(No. 98-1487

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided December 2, 1998.)

*Russell V. Lejfler,*Huron County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

*43The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

The trial court’s finding that William Gross is a sexual predator is reinstated.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
§ 535.309 Marine terminal services agreements—exemption. ( a ) *Marine terminal services agreement* means an agreement, contract, understanding, arrangement, or association, written or oral, (including any modification or appendix) between a marine terminal operator and an ocean common carrier that applies to marine terminal services that are provided to and paid for by an ocean common carrier. These services include: checking, dockage, free time, handling, heavy lift, loading and unloading, terminal storage, usage, wharfage, and wharf demurrage and including any marine terminal facilities that may be provided incidentally to such marine terminal services. The term *marine terminal services agreement* does not include any agreement that conveys to the involved carrier any rights to operate any marine terminal facility by means of a lease, license, permit, assignment, land rental, or similar other arrangement for the use of marine terminal facilities or property.
( b ) All marine terminal services agreements as defined in § 535.309(a) are exempt from the filing and waiting period requirements of the Act and this part on condition that: ( 1 ) They do not include rates, charges, rules, and regulations that are determined through a marine terminal conference agreement. *Marine terminal conference agreement* means an agreement between or among two or more marine terminal operators and/or ocean common carriers for the conduct or facilitation of marine terminal operations that provides for the fixing of and adherence to uniform maritime terminal rates, charges, practices and conditions of service relating to the receipt, handling, and/or delivery of passengers or cargo for all members; and
( 2 ) No antitrust immunity is conferred under the Act with regard to terminal services provided to an ocean common carrier under a marine terminal services agreement that is not filed with the Commission.
( c ) The filing fee for optional filing of terminal services agreements is provided in § 535.401(g).
[69 FR 64414, Nov. 4, 2004, as amended at 74 FR 65036, Dec. 9, 2009]
§ 188.05-33 Scientific personnel—interpretive rulings. ( a ) Scientific personnel on oceanographic research vessels are not considered to be seamen or passengers, but are considered as “persons” when requirements are based on total persons on board.
( b ) Scientific personnel on such vessels shall not be required to possess seamen's documents nor shall they be required to sign shipping articles.
[CGFR 67-83, 33 FR 1113, Jan. 27, 1968, as amended by CGD 77-081, 46 FR 56204, Nov. 16, 1981]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending October 22, 2005

|Filer                        | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                             
|---------------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|CITIZENS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY | * 3A5         | Citizens Development Company, Billings, Montana to merge with United Bancorporation, Billings, Montana and thereby indirectly acquire Lincoln County Bank, Merrill, Wisconsin; United Bank, Osseo, Wisconsin; Bank of Poynette, Poynette, Wisconsin and Cambridge State Bank, Cambridge, Wisconsin. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:11/10/2005
|Newspaper:                   | Not available
|Federal Register:            | 11/10/2005   
|CITIZENS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY | * 3A5         | Citizens Development Company, Billings, Montana to merge with Midwest Bancorporation, Billings, Montana and thereby indirectly acquire Clarke County State Bank, Osceola, Iowa, Farmers and Merchants State Bank, Iroquois, South Dakota and Farmers State Bank, Stickney, South Dakota.            | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:11/10/2005
|Newspaper:                   | Not available
|Federal Register:            | 11/10/2005   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 107 (Tuesday, June 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 31128]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2779]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds--Terminations: The 
Buckeye Union Insurance Company, The Fidelity and Casualty Company of 
New York; Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark, NJ

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 11 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570, 2006 Revision, published June 30, 2006, at 71 FR 37694.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the Certificates 
of Authority issued by the Treasury to the above-named companies under 
31 U.S.C. 9305 to qualify as acceptable sureties on Federal bonds have 
been terminated. The above-named companies merged with and into The 
Continental Insurance Company effective December 31, 2006. The 
surviving corporation of the merger activity is The Continental 
Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania domiciled corporation. Federal bond-
approving officials should annotate their reference copies of the 
Treasury Department Circular 570 (``Circular''), 2006 Revision, to 
reflect these changes.
    In the event bond-approving officers have questions relating to 
bonds issued by the above-named companies that have merged with and 
into The Continental Insurance Company, they should contact The 
Continental Insurance Company at (877) 262-2727.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570.
    Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: May 24, 2007.
Vivian L. Cooper,
Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Financial 
Management Service.
[FR Doc. 07-2779 Filed 6-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

WESTERN WORLD 

INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CLAXTON STREET 

APARTMENTS, L.L.C., 

 Defendant. 

 

Case No. 2:15-cv-12389 

Judge Marianne O. Battani 

Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti 

_________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S JUNE 24, 2016 PETITION 

FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE AND FOR OTHER RELIEF (DE 26) and 

CANCELLING HEARING NOTICED FOR AUGUST 4, 2016 (DE 28) 

By way of background, Judge Battani referred Plaintiff’s March 3, 2016 

motion to me for hearing and determination. (DEs 12, 13.) I held a hearing on 

May 16, 2016, after which I entered a May 19, 2016 opinion and order setting forth 

several rulings. (DE 24.) 

On June 24, 2016, Plaintiff filed the instant petition for rule to show cause 

and for other relief, which is related to my May 19, 2016 order. (DEs 26, 24.) 

Judge Battani referred this motion to me for hearing and determination, and a 

hearing was noticed for August 4, 2016. (DEs 27, 28). 

Meanwhile, on August 2, 2016, Plaintiff’s counsel (Terry L. Welch) 

informed the Court that this case has settled. Therefore, Plaintiff’s June 24, 2016 

2:15-cv-12389-MOB-APP Doc # 32 Filed 08/04/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 330
2

petition (DE 26) is DEEMED MOOT and accordingly DENIED on that basis. 

The related hearing scheduled for August 4, 2016 (DE 28) is CANCELLED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 Dated: August 2, 2016 s/Anthony P. Patti 

 Anthony P. Patti 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record 

on August 2, 2016, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail. 

 s/Michael Williams 

 Case Manager for the 

 Honorable Anthony P. Patti 

2:15-cv-12389-MOB-APP Doc # 32 Filed 08/04/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 331