alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 196.34-5 Approved types of work vests. ( a ) Each buoyant work vest carried under the permissive authority of this section must be approved under— ( 1 ) Subpart 160.053 of this chapter; or
( 2 ) Subpart 160.077 of this chapter as a commercial hybrid PFD.
[CGD 78-174A, 51 FR 4352, Feb. 4, 1986]
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-10193

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Myron Lynn Matthews, Jr., 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:22-CR-275-1

______________________________

Before Davis, Ho, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Myron Lynn Matthews, Jr., has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Matthews has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 28, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-10193 Document: 00516981152 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/28/2023
No. 23-10193

2

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-10193 Document: 00516981152 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/28/2023
**Exhibit
      15.1**





January
      4, 200 8





American
      Medical Alert Corp.


Oceanside,
      New York





We
      have
      reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
      Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information
      of
      American Medical Alert Corp. and Subsidiaries for the fiscal periods ended
      June
      30, 2007 and June 30, 2006, as indicated in our report dated August 13, 2007.
      Because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
      information.





We
      are
      aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, is incorporated by
      reference in the following Registration Statements:


·
              Registration
                  Statement No. 33-48385 on Form S-8;
 ·
              Registration
                  Statement No. 33-91806 on Form S-8;
 ·
              Registration
                  Statement No. 333-53029 on Form
                  S-8;
 ·
              Registration
                  Statement No. 333-70626 on Form
                  S-8;
 ·
              Registration
                  Statement No. 333-130811 on Form S-8;
                  and
 ·
              Registration
                  Statement No. 333-88192 on Form
                  S-3.




We
      also
      are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the
      Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is not considered a part of the Registration
      Statements prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
      certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the
      Securities Act of 1933, as amended.





/s/
      Margolin, Winer & Evens LLP




Margolin,
      Winer & Evens LLP


Garden
      City, New York
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA NO. DA 2 3 - 48 2 JOHN MICHAEL CONNORS, Petitioner and Appellee, v. JENNIFER MURRAY, Respondent and Appellant. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee ’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appell ee is granted an extension of time to and including February 1 1 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appel lee ’s Response brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court January 4 2024

01/04/2024
Case Number: DA 23-0482
----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

 upon the exercise of options, orother equity awards pursuant to the any stock option, stock bonus or other stockplan or arrangement then in effect or which the Company may from time to timeadopt provided the implementation of such is disclosed to CF&Co inadvance, (ii) theissuance of shares of Common Stock in connection with an acquisition, merger orsale or purchase of assets described in the Prospectus, (iii) any shares ofCommon Stock issuable upon conversion or exchange of securities or the exerciseof warrants, options or other rights in effect or outstanding or (iv) theissuance or sale of shares of Common Shares pursuant to any dividendreinvestment plan that the Company may adopt from time to time provided theimplementation of such is disclosed to CF&Co in advance.

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

| From: | [                               | ] |
|-------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|

| Cc: | [                               | ] |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|

| To: | [ | ] |
|-----|---|---|

----

----

----

| NOTE: | All      companies were incorporated in Virginia except for GLS Properties, LLC,      Allegheny Commercial Properties I, LLC, Allegheny Income Properties I,      LLC, and Allegheny Special Properties, LLC  (Pennsylvania). |
|-------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

----

----

----

----
§ 196.37-15 Firehose stations. ( a ) Each fire hydrant shall be identified in red letters and figures at least 2 inches high “FIRE STATION NO. 1”, “2”, “3”, etc. Where the hose is not stowed in the open or behind glass so as to be readily seen, this identification shall be so placed as to be readily seen from a distance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED IN THE  COMPANY'S  FORM 10-Q FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       6,379,520
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,200,625
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (252,305)
<INVENTORY>                                    390,793
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,919,565
<PP&E>                                       1,401,131
<DEPRECIATION>                               (259,805)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,389,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,949,589
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,884
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,026,956
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,389,421
<SALES>                                      2,564,187
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,564,187
<CGS>                                          880,146
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,039,699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4,506)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,142,523)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,142,523)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,142,523)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.40)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 103 (Wednesday, May 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 30019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2666]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Human Genome Research Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Conflict SEP.
    Date: June 14, 2007.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 
4076, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Ken D. Nakamura, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, National Human Genome 
Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers 
Lane, Suite 4076, MSC 9306, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-402-0838, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#442a252f252931362f0429252d286a2a2d2c6a232b32"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bad4dbd1dbd7cfc8d1fad7dbd3d694d4d3d294ddd5cc">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 22, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2666 Filed 5-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### PATRICK BARRES v. FRANK NOTTE.

Decided November 4, 1929.

Before G-ummere, Chief Justice, and Justices Parker and Bodine.

For the rule, *Gaetano M. Belfatto.*

*Contra, Louis J. Beers.*

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff in this case is a real estate broker who had a written contract signed by the defendant, authorizing him to sell certain premises belonging to the latter, located in the city of Newark, the purchase price to be $25,000, the defendant agreeing to pay the plaintiff a commission of three and a half per cent, on, such purchase price. The present suit is based upon a refusal of the defendant to pay this commission, although the plaintiff, as he alleged, had fully performed his part of the contract. The trial resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and the defendant has appealed from the judgment entered thereon.

The first ground of reversal argued by counsel is that the court committed error in its rulings upon certain testimony offered in the case. No such rulings, however, are stated as grounds of appeal, and consequently they are not entitled to be considered. The next contention is that the court should have nonsuited the plaintiff because of the fact that his authority to make a sale of the defendant’s property was revoked before he produced a purchaser for it. This, however, *942was a disputed question of fact and the court therefore properly left it to the jury for determination. The next ground of reversal is that the purchaser produced by the plaintiff was not financially able to buy the defendant’s property. This was also a disputed question of fact, and the trial court therefore was entirely justified in refusing to nonsuit upon this ground and leaving the question to be determined by the jury. - Lastly, it is argued that in order to entitle a broker to recover commissions there must actually be a conveyance by the owner to the purchaser, or a binding contract between the latter and the owner which could be enforced by the owner, and that the court should have nonsuited upon this ground, no binding contract having been made by the owner with the purchaser produced by the plaintiff. The proofs submitted on the part of the latter, however, showed that the failure to make the contract was due solely to the refusal of the defendant to enter into it with the intending purchaser. 'The jury by its verdict found that this was the situation, and so finding, a failure to execute the contract was no bar to the right of the plaintiff to recover his commission. It has frequently been held by our courts that an intending vendor cannot defeat the right of the broker to recover his commission by refusing to convey to a purchaser produced by the broker and who is able and willing to pay the purchase price and accept a conveyance.

Our conclusion is that the judgment under review should be affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE SHEETS
AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 24 AND 25 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K
FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,250
<SECURITIES>                                    17,668
<RECEIVABLES>                                       60<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        340<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,574
<PP&E>                                           1,429<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,040
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,485
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,305
<OTHER-SE>                                        (58)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,040
<SALES>                                             64
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    64
<CGS>                                              668
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      668
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,551<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  51
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,780)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,780)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,780)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>ITEM SHOWN NET OF ALLOWANCES, CONSISTENT WITH THE BALANCE SHEET PRESENTATION.
<F2>ITEM SHOWN NET OF DEPRECIATION, CONSISTENT WITH THE BALANCE SHEET PRESENTATION.
<F3>ITEM CONSISTS OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Submitted on record and briefs November 15,

affirmed December 13, 1995,

petition for review denied April 2, 1996 (323 Or 114)

#### STEVEN C. KONDRASKY, *Appellant, v.*Manfred (Fred) MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, *Respondent.*

(93C-11877; CA A83162)

907 P2d 1138

David W. Knofler filed the brief for appellant.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *Martin v. Baldwin,*138 Or App 296, 906 P2d 868 (1995).
Case 2:15-cv-11946-GCS-RSW   ECF No. 10-2, PageID.27   Filed 03/30/18   Page 1 of 14

Case 2:15-cv-11946-GCS-RSW   ECF No. 10-2, PageID.28   Filed 03/30/18   Page 2 of 14

Case 2:15-cv-11946-GCS-RSW   ECF No. 10-2, PageID.29   Filed 03/30/18   Page 3 of 14

Case 2:15-cv-11946-GCS-RSW   ECF No. 10-2, PageID.30   Filed 03/30/18   Page 4 of 14

Case 2:15-cv-11946-GCS-RSW   ECF No. 10-2, PageID.31   Filed 03/30/18   Page 5 of 14

Case 2:15-cv-11946-GCS-RSW   ECF No. 10-2, PageID.32   Filed 03/30/18   Page 6 of 14

Case 2:15-cv-11946-GCS-RSW   ECF No. 10-2, PageID.33   Filed 03/30/18   Page 7 of 14

Case 2:15-cv-11946-GCS-RSW   ECF No. 10-2, PageID.34   Filed 03/30/18   Page 8 of 14

Case 2:15-cv-11946-GCS-RSW   ECF No. 10-2, PageID.35   Filed 03/30/18   Page 9 of 14

Case 2:15-cv-11946-GCS-RSW   ECF No. 10-2, PageID.36   Filed 03/30/18   Page 10 of 14

Case 2:15-cv-11946-GCS-RSW   ECF No. 10-2, PageID.37   Filed 03/30/18   Page 11 of 14

Case 2:15-cv-11946-GCS-RSW   ECF No. 10-2, PageID.38   Filed 03/30/18   Page 12 of 14

Case 2:15-cv-11946-GCS-RSW   ECF No. 10-2, PageID.39   Filed 03/30/18   Page 13 of 14

Case 2:15-cv-11946-GCS-RSW   ECF No. 10-2, PageID.40   Filed 03/30/18   Page 14 of 14
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending March 1, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*David F. Ryan *v.*The Board of Police Commissioners of the Police Department of the City of New York.

Order affirmed and writ quashed, with costs. .
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1536

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend for two years an expiring

authority of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs with respect to determination of locality salaries for certain nurse anesthetist positions in the

Department of Veterans Affairs.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 2, 1995

Mr. HUTCHINSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend for two

years an expiring authority of the Secretary of Veterans

Affairs with respect to determination of locality salaries

for certain nurse anesthetist positions in the Department

of Veterans Affairs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 7451(d)(3)(C)(iii) of title 38, United States

4 Code, is amended by striking out ‘‘April 1, 1995’’ and in5 serting in lieu thereof ‘‘December 31, 1997’’.

Æ
#### § 309.202 Definitions.

Stores and supplies are those articles and commodities used and consumed in the day-to-day operation of a vessel by the operation and maintenance of machinery and equipment; the maintenance of clean and sanitary conditions; the feeding of passengers, officers, and crew; and stocked for the use and convenience of passengers, officers, and crew. Vessel stores and supplies include (a) consumable stores, (b) subsistence stores, (c) slop chest, (d) bar stock, and (e) fuel, as defined in Maritime Administration Inventory Books, Forms MA-4736, A through K.