alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel; Rehabilitation for Methamphetamine Induced Impulsivity.                    

*Date:*                         June 5, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         1:30 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Lyle Furr, Contract Review Specialist, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-8401, (301) 435-1439,                         *lf33c.nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 21, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2611 Filed 5-25-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending December 2, 2006

|Filer                    | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------------ | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------
|EHPW ACQUISITION COMPANY | * 3A5* 3A1  | EHPW Acquisition Company, Harrisburg, PA, to form a bank holding company by acquiring Vartan National Bank, Harrisburg, PA, pursuant to Section 3(a)(1) of the Bank Holding Company Act. In addition, EHPW Acquisition Company, Harrisburg, PA, to acquire Vartan Financial Corporation, Harrisburg, PA, pursuant Section 3(a)(5) of the Bank Holding Company Act. | Newspaper:12/26/2006Federal Register:12/26/2006
|Newspaper:               | 12/26/2006 
|Federal Register:        | 12/26/2006 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          21,745
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,424
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,350
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    434,558
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        525,069
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (8,364)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,048,376
<DEPOSITS>                                     877,552
<SHORT-TERM>                                    28,525
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,675
<LONG-TERM>                                     32,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,811
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,013
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,048,376
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 31,143
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               24,879
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   252
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                56,274
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              26,645
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,118
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           27,156
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 159
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 25,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,177
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,127
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,127
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.51
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,441
<LOANS-PAST>                                       633
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,330
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,023
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      839
<RECOVERIES>                                       198
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                8,364
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,101
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          4,263
        

</TABLE>
# Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed July 21, 2021

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21

- 287 Lower Tribunal No s

. 19

- 8478 CC, 20

- 252 AP

________________ 

### United Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant,

vs. 

### Multimed Care, Inc., a/a/o Alvaro Ramos Hernandez , Appellee.

An Appeal from the C ounty Court for Miami

- Dade County, Michaelle Gonzalez

- Paulson , Judge.
Michael J. Neimand , for appellant. Feiler & Leach, P.L. and Martin E. Leach , for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J. , and GORDO and LOBREE, JJ.
PER C URIAM. United Automobile Insurance Company (“United Auto ”) appeals from2 a final judgment awarding attorney ’ s fees to Multimed Care, Inc. (“Multimed
Care ”). United Auto argues that the trial court erred in awarding attorney ’ s fees without conducting an evidentiary hearing on the reasonableness of the fees. This issue is resolved by our recent decision in United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Professional Medical Group, Inc. , 46 Fla. L. Weekly D1102 a (Fla. 3d DCA May 12, 2012), which the trial court did not have the benefit of at the time it entered final judgment. Based on our precent, United Auto is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the reasonableness of attorney ’ s fee s

. 1

Id. Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment awarding attorney ’ s fees and remand for an evidentiary hearing.
Reversed and remanded.

1 Mul timed Care argues that United Auto waived its right to an evidentiary hearing by failing to timely request one pursuant t o a 2019 i nterim c ase m anagement o rder

. This argument is without merit. T he record shows that the trial court did not enforce its 201 9 c ase m anagement o rder and subsequent ly entered another c ase m anagement o rder in 2020. Pursuant to this order, United Auto timely requested an evidentiary hearing. “ By requesting that the court hold an evidentiary hearing on the issue of attorney ’ s fees , appellant[ ] preserved [its] right to a hearing.” ” Id. at D1102a (alteration in original) (quoting Petrovsky v. HSBC Bank, USA , 185 So. 3d 700, 702 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) )

.
Exhibit 99.2



     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In  connection  with the filing of the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the
Quarter Ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") by American  Medical Alert Corp.
("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:

         1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

         2.    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of Registrant.



                                                   /s/ Richard Rallo
                                                   -------------------------
                                                   Richard Rallo
                                                   Controller
                                                   (Chief financial officer)
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of and for the period covered by theReport. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      August 13, 2010 |   | /s/      Price W. Schwenck     |   |
|----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                       |   | Price      W. Schwenck         |   |
|                       |   | Chief      Executive Officer   |   |
|                       |   |                           |   |
|                       |   |                           |   |
| Date:      August 13, 2010 |   | /s/      Valerie A. Kendall    |   |
|                       |   | Valerie A. Kendall             |   |
|                       |   | Executive Vice President       |   |
|                       |   | and Chief Financial    Officer |   |

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11** 
**- 1298** 

NATHAN ANDREW GROVES; JOEL STROUD , Plaintiffs

– Appellants ,

v.
DARLINGTON SOUTH CAROLINA, THE CITY OF ,
Defendant

– Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Terry L. Wooten , District Judge. ( 4:08

- cv
- 00402

- TLW )

Submitted : November 9, 2011 Decided: December 8, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un publish ed per curiam opinion

.

Joel F. Stroud, JOEL F. STROUD, Chesterfield, South Carolina, for Appellants. J. Scott Kozacki, WILLCOX, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circ uit.2 PER CURIAM:
The Appellants, Nathan Andrew Groves and Joel Flake
Stroud, appeal the district court ’s order adopting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary
judgment in favor of the Appellee and rendering the Appellee’s
pending motions moot, and the magistrate judge’s order denying
the Appellants’ motion to transfer the case to another division

of the district court. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s
and magist rate judge’s orders. We also deny the Appellant s ’
motion to expedite the decision as moot. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the de cisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 50.10-35 Constructed.

The term *constructed* means the keel has been laid or, for vessels with no keel, assembly of at least 50 tons or 1% of the estimated mass of all structural material, whichever is less, has been completed.

[CGD 83-043, 60 FR 24772, May 10, 1995]
# C_2013225EN.01003101.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/31

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 May 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — TNT Express Worldwide (Poland) sp. z o.o. v Minister Finansów

(Case C-169/12) (1)

1

(Value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 66(a) to (c) - Transport and shipping services - Chargeability - Date on which payment is received and no later than 30 days from the date on which the services are supplied - Invoice issued earlier)

2013/C 225/51

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: TNT Express Worldwide (Poland) sp. z o.o.

Applicant:

Defendant: Minister Finansów

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Naczelny Sad Administracyjny (Poland) — Interpretation of Article 66 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1), as amended — National legislation fixing the time when liability to pay VAT in respect of supplies of transport and shipping services arises on the date when the price is paid and no later than 30 days from the date on which those services are supplied, even when the invoice is issued earlier

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 66 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as amended by Council Directive 2008/117/EC of 16 December 2008, is to be interpreted as precluding national legislation which provides that, in respect of transport and shipping services, value added tax is to become chargeable on the date on which payment is received in full or in part, but no later than 30 days from the date on which those services are supplied, even where the invoice has been issued earlier and specifies a later deadline for payment.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 14.7.2012.

1

---
#### Office of Disciplinary Counsel *v.*Bancsi.

[Cite as *Disciplinary Counsel v. Bancsi*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 1202.]

(No. 97-436

Submitted and decided October 29, 1998.)

On Application for Reinstatement.

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent Joseph Bancsi, Attorney Registration No. 0025450, last known address in Rocky River, Ohio.

The court coming now to consider its order of September 24, 1998, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year with six months stayed, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that Joseph Bancsi be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier cases, see *Disciplinary Counsel v. Bancsi*(1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 392, 683 N.E.2d 1072, and *Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Bancsi*(1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 525, 651 N.E.2d 949.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
§ 535.202 Non-subject agreements. This part does not apply to the following agreements: ( a ) Any acquisition by any person, directly or indirectly, of any voting security or assets of any other person;
( b ) Any maritime labor agreement;
( c ) Any agreement related to transportation to be performed within or between foreign countries;
( d ) Any agreement among common carriers to establish, operate, or maintain a marine terminal in the United States; and
( e ) Any agreement among marine terminal operators that exclusively and solely involves transportation in the interstate commerce of the United States.
#### Hugh H. Boles, *Respondent, v.*William Coons, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. Mem. by

Haight, J.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending January 13, 2007

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                       | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|-------------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|EVB, TAPPAHANNOCK, VIRGINIA                  | 790721  | 08/21/2006 | 12/14/2006     | S         | Large Bank 
|PLANTERS B&TC OF VA, STAUNTON, VIRGINIA      | 985620  | 09/18/2006 | 12/24/2006     | S         | Large Bank 
|PLEASANTS CTY BK, SAINT MARYS, WEST VIRGINIA | 8631    | 09/25/2006 | 12/28/2006     | S         | Small Bank 
|RBC CENTURA BK, ROCKY MOUNT, NORTH CAROLINA  | 1494240 | 04/17/2006 | 12/06/2006     | S         | Large Bank 
|SANDY SPRING BK, OLNEY, MARYLAND             | 506922  | 08/07/2006 | 12/24/2006     | S         | Large Bank 
|UNION B&TC, BOWLING GREEN, VIRGINIA          | 693224  | 06/19/2006 | 10/24/2006     | S         | Large Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 503.84 Nonpublic Collaborative Discussions. ( a ) *General.* Notwithstanding § 503.72, a majority of the Commissioners may hold a meeting that is not open to public observation to discuss official agency business if: ( 1 ) No formal or informal vote or other official agency action is taken at the meeting;
( 2 ) Each individual present at the meeting is a Commissioner or an employee of the Commission;
( 3 ) At least one (1) Commissioner from each political party is present at the meeting, if there are sitting Commissioners from more than one party; and
( 4 ) The General Counsel of the Commission is present at the meeting.
( b ) *Disclosure of nonpublic collaborative discussions.* Except as provided under paragraph (c) of this section, not later than two (2) business days after the conclusion of a meeting under paragraph (a) of this section, the Commission shall make available to the public, in a place easily accessible to the public: ( 1 ) A list of the individuals present at the meeting; and
( 2 ) A summary of the matters discussed at the meeting, except for any matters the Commission properly determines may be withheld from the public under § 503.73.
( c ) *Exception.* If the Commission properly determines matters may be withheld from the public under § 503.73, the Commission shall provide a summary with as much general information as possible on those matters withheld from the public.
( d ) *Ongoing proceedings.* If a meeting under paragraph (a) of this section directly relates to an ongoing proceeding before the Commission, the Commission shall make the disclosure under paragraph (b) of this section on the date of the final Commission decision.
[85 FR 9682, Feb. 20, 2020]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

NANCY GRULKE,

Plaintiff,

-vs.- Case No. 15-cv-12463-TLL-PTM

Hon. Thomas L. Ludington

CREDIT CONTROL, LLC,

A Missouri corporation,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS TO EITHER PARTY

The Plaintiff hereby dismisses the within action with prejudice and without costs to either 

party.

 Respectfully submitted

October 5, 2015 /s/ Gary Nitzkin____________

 GARY D. NITZKIN (P41155)

 Attorney for Plaintiff

 22142 West Nine Mile Road

 Southfield, MI 48033

 (248) 353-2882 

 GNitzkin@creditor-law.com

Case 1:15-cv-12463-TLL-PTM ECF No. 9 filed 10/05/15 PageID.19 Page 1 of 1