alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending December 2, 2006

|Filer                           | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC, THE | FBSEA          | The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, Edinburgh, Scotland to establish a branch at 600 Steamboat Road, Greenwich, Connecticut pursuant to section 211.24(a)(1) of Regulation K. | Newspaper:12/03/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                      | 12/03/2006    
|Federal Register:               | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Francis L. Simola, Chairman, President and CEO of PowerCold Corporation (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 30, 2005



/s/ Francis L. Simola

Francis L. Simola

Chairman, President and CEO













































---
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending May 24, 2008

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|ARVEST BANK       | * Branch       | Arvest Bank, Fayetteville, Arkansas, to establish a branch facility to be located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Highway 64 and Rudy Road, Alma, Arkansas. | Newspaper:06/01/2008Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 06/01/2008    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable
|ARVEST BANK       | * Branch       | Arvest Bank, Fayetteville, Arkansas, to establish a branch facility located at 1404-A Highway 62/65 North, Harrison, Arkansas.                                             | Newspaper:06/02/2008Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 06/02/2008    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Third Quarter of 2008 (July 1, 2008 - September 30, 2008)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### [The State ex rel.] Sinclair, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Sinclair v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 224.]

(No. 97-647

Submitted October 27, 1998

Decided December 30, 1998.)

*Law Offices of James R. Nein, Matthew R. Copp*and *James R. Nein,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Michael A. Vanderhorst,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

*225The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### § 32.45-1 Installation and details.

The installation of all electrical engineering or interior communications systems, together with the details of design, construction, and installation, must meet the requirements of subchapter J (Electrical Engineering Regulations) of this chapter.

[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15230, Apr. 8, 1982]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SoundView Technology Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mark F. Loehr, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|Dated: August 14, 2003 |  | SOUNDVIEW TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------
|                       |  | By:                             

---

QuickLinks
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 3, 2018

d0625 

# Order

Clerk July 3, 2018

155208

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 155208

COA: 334155

Wayne CC: 15

- 004801

- FH

JOHN LAWRENCE JAKUBOWSKI,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of September 12, 2017, the application for leave to appeal the December

6, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in

People v Chatman (Docket No. 155184). On order of the Court, leave to appeal having

been denied in Chatman on March 9, 2018, ___ Mich ___ (2018), the application is again

considered. It appearing to this Court that the case of People v A mes (Docket No.

156077) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in that case may

resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the

application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that cas e.
Non-Executive Director Compensation Structure



 Exhibit 10.18.1 
  
 Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. 
 Non-Executive Director Compensation Structure 
 Effective Date – May 16, 2005 

 

													
	 	  	 Board of
 Directors

	  	 Audit
 Committee

	  	 Compensation
 Committee

	  	 Governance and
 Nomination
 Committee


	 Annual Retainer, Chair
	  	 	N/A	  	$	7,500	  	$	5,000	  	$	5,000
	 Annual Retainer, Member
	  	$	22,500	  	$	5,000	  	$	3,000	  	$	3,000
	 Meeting Fee *
	  	$	1,500	  	$	1,500	  	$	1,500	  	$	1,500



	*	Compensation is not paid for telephonic meetings.
EXHIBIT 10.9
 Triad Automobile Receivables Warehouse Trust
5201 Rufe Snow Drive
North Richland Hills, Texas 76180
  Via Facsimile




---



##### 








---



##### 



TRIAD AUTOMOBILE RECEIVABLES WAREHOUSE TRUST,
Borrower

By: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY,
not in its individual capacity
but solely as Owner TrusteeBy:
    /s/ Rachel L. SimpsonName:
    Rachel L. SimpsonTitle:
    Senior Financial Services Officer




---



##### 



TRIAD FINANCIAL WAREHOUSE SPECIAL PURPOSE LLC,
SellerBy:
    /s/ Mike L. WilhelmsName:
    Mike L. WilhelmsTitle:
    Senior Vice President & Chief
Financial OfficerTRIAD FINANCIAL CORPORATION,
OriginatorBy:
    /s/ Daniel D. LeonardName:
    Daniel D. LeonardTitle:
    President & Chief Executive
OfficerTRIAD FINANCIAL CORPORATION,
ServicerBy:
    /s/ Daniel D. LeonardName:
    Daniel D. LeonardTitle:
    President & Chief Executive
Officer




---



##### 



THE BANK OF NEW YORK,
Collection Account BankBy:
    /s/ Byron M. TinninName:
    Byron M. TinninTitle:
    Vice President




---



##### 



SHEFFIELD RECEIVABLES CORPORATION,
Class A Lender

By:  BARCLAYS BANK PLC, as attorney-in-factBy:
    /s/ David ListerName:
    David ListerTitle:
    DirectorBARCLAYS BANK PLC,
Class B LenderBy:
    /s/ Pierre DuleyrieName:
    Pierre DuleyrieTitle:
    DirectorBARCLAYS BANK PLC,
the AgentBy:
    /s/ Pierre DuleyrieName:
    Pierre DuleyrieTitle:
    Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000827056
<NAME>                        ZEVEX International
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         3383544
<SECURITIES>                                   3224817
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6018229
<ALLOWANCES>                                   175000
<INVENTORY>                                    5119291
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               17717843
<PP&E>                                         7579540
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2245963
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 34049689
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5782319
<BONDS>                                        1700000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3421
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   34049689
<SALES>                                        23026208
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               23026208
<CGS>                                          12474210
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  12474210
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7658930
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             481615
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2893068
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1187989
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1626373
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1626373
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .47



</TABLE>
§ 404.2 Procedure and criteria for recognizing association expenses. ( a ) A pilotage association must report each expense item for which it seeks reimbursement through the charging of pilotage rates, and make supporting information available to the Director. The Director must recognize the item as both necessary for providing pilotage service, and reasonable as to its amount when compared to similar expenses paid by others in the maritime or other comparable industry, or when compared with Internal Revenue Service guidelines. The association will be given an opportunity to contest any preliminary determination that a reported item should not be recognized.
( b ) The Director applies the following criteria to recognize an expense item as necessary and reasonable within the meaning of paragraph (a) of this section: ( 1 ) *Operating or capital lease costs.* Conformity to market rates, or in the absence of a comparable market, conformity to depreciation plus an allowance for return on investment, computed as if the asset had been purchased with equity capital.
( 2 ) *Return-on-investment.* A market equivalent return-on-investment is allowed for the net capital invested in the association by its members, if that investment is necessary for providing pilotage service.
( 3 ) *Transactions not directly related to providing pilotage services.* Revenues and expenses generated from these transactions are included in ratemaking calculations as long as the revenues exceed the expenses. If these transactions adversely affect providing pilotage services, the Director may make rate adjustments or take other steps to ensure pilotage service is provided.
( 4 ) *Pilot benefits.* Association-paid benefits, including medical and pension benefits and profit sharing, are treated as pilot compensation.
( 5 ) *Profit sharing for non-pilot association employees.* These association expenses are recognizable.
( 6 ) *Legal expenses.* These association expenses are recognizable except for any and all expenses associated with legal action against the U.S. Coast Guard or its agents in relation to the ratemaking and oversight requirements in 46 U.S.C. 9303, 9304 and 9305.
( 7 ) *Apprentice Pilot expenses.* The association's expenses for Apprentice Pilots and Apprentice Pilots with Limited Registrations, such as health care, travel expenses, training, and other expenses are recognizable when determined to be necessary and reasonable.
( c ) The Director does not recognize the following expense items as necessary and reasonable within the meaning of paragraph (a) of this section: ( 1 ) Unreported or undocumented expenses, and expenses that are not reasonable in their amounts or not reasonably related to providing safe, efficient, and reliable pilotage service;
( 2 ) Revenues and expenses from Canadian pilots that are commingled with revenues and expenses from U.S. pilots;
( 3 ) Lobbying expenses; or
( 4 ) Expenses for personal matters.
[USCG-2015-0497, 81 FR 11941, Mar. 7, 2016, as amended by USCG-2018-0665, 84 FR 20578, May 10, 2019; USCG-2020-0457, 86 FR 14220, Mar. 12, 2021; USCG-2021-0431, 87 FR 18524, Mar. 30, 2022]
| Skip Navigation | Accessibility enhancement features requireJavascript |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------|

**Transcript: "What Is KidneyDisease?"**

Interviewer: Anestimated 3.83% of adults aged 20 or older -- that's about 7.7million Americans -- have physiological evidence of chronic kidneydisease. Dr. Narva explains that chronic kidney disease is definedin two ways.

Dr. Narva: One is adecrease in the filtering ability of the kidney. The kidney is afilter and when you've lost about half of your filtering capacityyou can be diagnosed as having chronic kidney disease. The secondway of being diagnosed as having chronic kidney disease is if youhave evidence of kidney injury, even if your kidney filtersnormally.

Interviewer: Mostpeople have two kidneys. They're located near the middle of theback. Every day healthy kidneys filter about 200 quarts of bloodand remove about two quarts of waste and extra water to make urine.But how do you know if your kidneys are functioning normally?

Dr. Narva: Kidneydisease is often referred to as a "silent disease." It's said thatit's silent because most people have no symptoms until theirkidneys are very, very seriously injured. In other words, normallywe have a lot of extra kidney capacity -- a lot of extra filteringcapacity -- and you can lose half of that and not even be aware ofit. You can loose three quarters of it and you may not be aware ofit. In fact, many people don't become aware that they have kidneydisease until just a relatively short time before they requiredialysis. That's why it's very important for people to be screenedearly if they're at risk. So if you have heart disease, if you havehigh blood pressure, if you have diabetes, if you have anyone inyour family with kidney disease, you should be screened and thescreening is very simple.
§ 502.702 Hearing requests. ( a ) Upon receipt of a timely hearing request under § 515.17 of this chapter, the Secretary will transmit the request to the Office of Administrative Law Judges.
( b ) The assigned administrative law judge will notify the Bureau of Certification and Licensing (BCL) and the Bureau of Enforcement of the hearing request, and the Bureau of Enforcement must file with the administrative law judge and serve on the applicant or licensee a copy of the notice given to the applicant or licensee and a copy of BCL materials supporting the notice. [Rule 702.]
EXHIBIT 32
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Victory Energy Corporation (the “Company”) for the three-month period ended March 31, 2011, (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated: May 23 ,2011
By:
/s/ ROBERT J. MIRANDARobert J. MirandaChief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)Dated: May 23, 2011
By:
/s/  ROBERT J. MIRANDARobert J. MirandaChief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 310.50 Purpose.

The regulations in this subpart govern the nomination, admission and appointment of midshipmen to the United States Merchant Marine Academy,
1 ... T h i s proc ee di n g ar i s es out of Cau s e N o. 2009- CR

- 6566 , s t y l ed S t a t e v . Ja so n M i ea rs , p e n d ing in the 3 7 9 th Jud i ci al D i st ri ct C o urt , B exar C o unt y , T exas , t he H o no rable Ro n R angel presi d i ng. i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No

. 04 -0 9- 00 80 3- CR IN RE J ason M IEA RS Orig inal Procee ding 1 PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Phy lis J . Speedlin, J ustice

Steven C. Hilbig, Just ice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: Dece mber 23, 2009 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF PROHI BI TI ON DEN I ED On De ce m b er 14, 2009, relator Jason Miears f iled a petition for wr it of prohibition, complainingthe 379th J udicial Dis trict Court does nothave jur isdiction over the pendingcriminal proce eding . The c ourt has considered relator’ s petition for writ of prohibit ion and is of the opinion that r e lator

is n ot e nti tle d to the re lie f s ou g ht. Ac c or din g ly , th e pet it io n fo r wri t of pr oh ibi tio n is DENI ED. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(a). P E R C U R I A M DO NO T PU B L I SH
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 8, 2021 No. 04
- 21
- 00317
- CV IN THE INTEREST OF J.M.E., C.J.V., T.A.W., R.A.C., AND S.S.H., CHILDREN,

From the 166th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021PA00277 Honorable Susan D. Reed , Judge Presiding



## O R D E R
Thi s court has jurisdiction over appeals from final judgments and certain interlocutory orders the Legislature has designated as appealable. In re C.R.D ., Nos. 03
- 19
- 00561
- CV, 03
- 19
- 00562
- CV, 2019 WL 4281929, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Austin Sept. 11, 2019, no pet.) (d ismissing appeals for lack of jurisdiction because the trial court’s order did not dispose of all parties’ parental rights and it continued the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services as temporary managing conservator as to three of the children ) ; In re F.M.
- T . , No. 02
- 12
- 00522
- CV, 2013 WL 1337 789, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth Apr. 4, 2013, no pet. ) ( dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction when the trial court’s interlocutory termination order did not dispose of one parent’s rights as to one child). An order is final for purposes of appeal if it disposes of all pending parties and issues in the case. Lehmann v. Har
- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 ( Tex. 2001) . Here, appellant L.M.W. filed a notice of appeal challenging the trial court’s August 21, 2021 interlocutory order terminating her parental rights as to her children, J.M.E., C.J.V., T.A.W., R.A.C., and S.S.H. However, the order appealed from d oes not dispose of all parties in the underlying case. Specifically, the order does not dispose of M.C.E.’s parental rights to J.M.E., C.J.V.’s parental rights to C.J.V., D.D.C.’s parental rights to T.A.W., and A.C.’s parental rights to R.A.C. Additionally , the trial court’s August 21, 2021 is captioned “Interlocutory Order of Termination as to [L.M.W.] and [W.K.H.].” We, therefore, ORDER appellant L.M.W. to show cause in writing on or before September 24, 2021 , why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. We suspend all appellate deadlines pending our determination of whether we have jurisdiction over this appeal.



### _________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

### IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 8th day of September, 2021 .

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ , Clerk of Court