alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
REGISTRANT'S  FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,203,525
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,556,979
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,500,405
<INVENTORY>                                    368,120
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,456,885
<PP&E>                                       1,417,238
<DEPRECIATION>                                 415,657
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,850,086
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,598,029
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        3,766,297
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,070
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,144,950
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,860,086
<SALES>                                      9,402,744
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,402,744
<CGS>                                        2,161,594
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,955,087
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,385,598)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,385,598)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                    (612,600)
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,998,198)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.78)




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32



     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I,  Carey  G.  Birmingham,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly  Report  of  International  Test  Systems, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the
fiscal  quarter ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of
Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934 and that
information  contained  in  such  Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of International Test
Systems,  Inc.

 Date: August 22, 2006

                                       By: /s/ Carey G. Birmingham
                                       ---------------------------
                                       Carey G. Birmingham,
                                       Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Principal Accounting Officer

<PAGE>
### The Honorab 1 

### for s to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994). ___________ No. 96-1143 Vincent Antone Johnson, * * v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellees.

___________ Filed: September 10, 1996 Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

1

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § tria Having carefully reviewed the entire record and the parties submissions, we concl not clearly erroneous, and based on these facts, we conclude defendants di not violate the Eighth Amendment. Accordingly, w See 47B.

### -2- A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
----

|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the      Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      L. Paul Latham                                         |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| L.      Paul Latham                                             |
| President      and Chief Executive Officer                      |
| of      Southwest Royalties, Inc., the                          |
| Managing      General Partner of                                |
| Southwest      Royalties Institutional Income Fund VIII-B, L.P. |
|                                                            |
| March      28, 2008                                             |
|                                                            |
|                                                            |
| /s/      Mel G. Riggs                                           |
| Mel      G. Riggs                                               |
| Vice      President and Chief Financial Officer of              |
| Southwest      Royalties, Inc., the                             |
| Managing      General Partner of                                |
| Southwest      Royalties Institutional Income Fund VIII-B, L.P. |
|                                                            |
| March      28, 2008                                             |
**Exhibit 31.2**
 **Certification of the**
 **Chief Financial Officer**
 
 I, H. Ravi Brar certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pac-West Telecomm, Inc. 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
 4.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 
 a.
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b.
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c.
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 
 5.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 
 a.
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b.
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting 
 Date: November 15, 2004
 
 /s/ H. Ravi Brar
 ________________________________
 H. Ravi Brar
 Chief Financial Officer and Vice President Human Resources
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


                        List of Subsidiaries of Issuer

                                                                   Percentage of
                                                                   Shares Owned
                                                                     by Issuer
                                                                   -------------
Micro-Filtration, Inc.; incorporated in Michigan                        80%

Numation Inc.; incorporated in Michigan                                 90%

Numatech Inc.; incorporated in Michigan                                 88%

I.A.E. Incorporated; incorporated in Michigan                          100%

Ultra Air Products, Inc.; incorporated in Michigan                      80%

Microsmith, Inc.; incorporated in Arizona                               90%

Numatics B.V.; organized in the Netherlands                            100%

Numatics S.A. de C.V.; organized in Mexico                             100%

Numatics S.A.R.L.; organized in France                                 100%

Numatics Ltd.; organized in the United Kingdom                         100%

Numatics Ltd.; organized in Canada                                     100%

NAC Beteilingungs GmbH; organized in Germany                           100%

Numatics GmbH; organized in Germany                                    100%

Numatics K.F.T.; organized in Hungary                                  100%

Numatics Ltd; organized in Taiwan                                       95%

Numatics S.R.L.; organized in Italy                                    100%

Univer GmbH; organized in Germany                                      100%

Empire Air Systems, Inc.; incorporated in New York                     100%
# C_2013225EN.01005707.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/57

---

Order of the President of the Court of 27 March 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-331/12) (1)

1

2013/C 225/118

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 287, 22.9.2012.

1

---
<PAGE>   1
                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                          JURISDICTION

<S>                                                                       <C>
eVentures Latin America, Inc.                                             Delaware
AxisTel Communications, Inc.                                              Delaware
         Novo Networks Global Services, Inc.                              Delaware
         Novo Networks International Services, Inc.                       Delaware
         Novo Networks Media Services, Inc.                               Delaware
         Novo Networks Metro Services, Inc.                               Delaware
         Web2Dial Communications, Inc.                                    Delaware
         Axistel Communications UK Ltd                                    United Kingdom
Novo Networks Operating Corp.                                             Delaware
e.Volve Technology Group, Inc.                                            Nevada
         e.Volve Technology Group de                                      Mexico
         Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
Internet Global Services, Inc.                                            Texas
         Internet Streaming Video, Inc.                                   Texas
</Table>
§ 45.185 Tow limitations. ( a ) Barges must not be manned.
( b ) No more than a total of three barges per tow may operate on the Milwaukee, St. Joseph, and Muskegon routes. A mixed tow of load-lined and exempted barges is still limited to three barges on those routes.
( c ) Tows must not be more than 5 nautical miles from shore.
[USCG-1998-4623, 67 FR 19690, Apr. 23, 2002, as amended at 75 FR 70604, Nov. 18, 2010]
§ 32.55-30 Venting of cargo tanks of tank vessels constructed between November 10, 1936, and July 1, 1951—TB/ALL. ( a ) *Venting required.* On all tank vessels, the construction or alteration of which is started on or after November 10, 1936, and prior to July 1, 1951, each cargo tank shall be equipped with a vent. The details of the venting system shall meet the requirements of this section, or alternatively, the requirements of either § 32.55-20 or § 32.55-25, as applicable, shall be met.
( b ) *Grade A liquids.* ( 1 ) Cargo tanks in which Grade A liquids are to be transported shall be fitted with a venting system consisting of branch vent line from each cargo tank connected to a vent header which shall extend to a reasonable height above the weather deck and be fitted with a flame arrester or pressure-vacuum relief valve. Each branch vent line may be provided with a manually operated control valve, provided it is bypassed with a pressure-vacuum relief valve or each cargo tank to which such a branch vent line is connected is fitted with an independent pressure-vacuum relief valve. The vent header system shall be provided with suitable connections for flushing and draining.
( 2 ) In barges with independent tanks carrying Grade A liquids, separate discharge pipes may be fitted to each pressure-vacuum relief valve, or the pressure-vacuum relief valve may be elevated, so that in either case the discharge from such valve will not be less than 7 feet above the deck where practicable.
( c ) *Grade B or C liquids.* Cargo tanks in which Grade B or C liquids are to be transported shall be fitted with individual pressure-vacuum relief valves or shall be fitted with a venting system consisting of branch vent lines connected to a vent header which shall extend to a reasonable height above the weather deck and be fitted with a flame arrester or a pressure-vacuum relief valve.
( d ) *Grade D or E liquids.* Cargo tanks in which Grade D or E liquids only are to be transported shall be fitted with gooseneck vents and flame screens unless such tanks are vented by pressure-vacuum relief valves or a venting system of branch vent lines and a vent header.
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Central Federal Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date:      May 14, 2010
    /s/ Therese Ann LiutkusTherese Ann Liutkus, CPATreasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 7, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-72

Lower Tribunal Nos. 19-312AP and 18-1012SP

________________

All Insurance Restoration Services, Inc., etc.,

Appellant,

vs.

People's Trust Insurance Company,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Lawrence 

D. King, Judge.

Giasi Law, P.A., and Melissa A. Giasi (Tampa), for appellant.

Brett R. Frankel and Jonathan M. Sabghir (Deerfield Beach); Cole, 

Scott & Kissane, P.A. and Mark D. Tinker (Tampa), for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY, and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1448

To amend the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 to require that determinations regarding status as an Indian child and as a member of an

Indian tribe be prospective from the date of birth of the child and

of tribal membership of the member, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 6, 1995

Ms. PRYCE (for herself, Mr. SOLOMON, and Mr. BURTON of Indiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Resources

A BILL

To amend the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 to require

that determinations regarding status as an Indian child

and as a member of an Indian tribe be prospective from

the date of birth of the child and of tribal membership

of the member, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS.

4 (a) INDIAN CHILD.—Paragraph (4) of section 4 of

5 the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. 1903)

6 is amended by inserting ‘‘at the time of the child’s birth’’

7 after ‘‘Indian tribe’’ the third place it appears.
2

•HR 1448 IH

1 (b) MEMBER OF AN INDIAN TRIBE.—Section 4 of

2 such Act is amended—

3 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph

4 (11);

5 (2) by striking the period at the end of para6 graph (12) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

7 (3) by adding at the end the following:

8 ‘‘(13) ‘Member of an Indian tribe’ means a per9 son who is on the membership roll (or otherwise con10 sidered a member under consistently applied policies

11 and practices) of the Indian tribe and, if over the

12 age of eighteen before first becoming a member of

13 the Indian tribe, became such a member only upon

14 the person’s written consent.’’.

15 SEC. 2. RETROACTIVE EFFECT OF TRIBAL MEMBERSHIP

16 NOT PERMITTED.

17 Section 101 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978

18 (25 U.S.C. 1911) is amended by adding at the end the

19 following:

20 ‘‘(e) For the purposes of any child custody proceeding

21 involving an Indian child, membership in an Indian tribe

22 shall be effective from the actual date of admission to

23 membership in the Indian tribe and shall not be given ret24 roactive effect.’’.
3

•HR 1448 IH

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with

3 respect to any child custody proceeding in which a final

4 decree has not been entered as of the date of the enact5 ment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NetSolve, Incorporated (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David D. Hood, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    David D. HoodName:

David D. HoodTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer




August 12, 2003



|* |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 52.01-100 Openings and compensation (modifies PG-32 through PG-39, PG-42 through PG-55). ( a ) The rules for openings and compensation must be as indicated in PG-32 through PG-55 of Section I of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 52.01-1) except as noted otherwise in this section.
( b ) (Modifies PG-39.) Pipe and nozzle necks must be attached to vessel walls as indicated in PG-39 of Section I of the ASME BPVC except that threaded connections must not be used under any of the following conditions:
( c ) (Modifies PG-42.) Butt-welding flanges and fittings must be used when full radiography is required by § 56.95-10 of this subchapter.
[CGD 81-79, 50 FR 9432, Mar. 8, 1985, as amended by USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65161, Oct. 31, 2008]