Appendix F 

Excerpts from Connecticut’s 2005 Draft Periodic Emission 

Inventory (PEI) for Ozone and Carbon Monoxide 

• Mobile Source: Aircraft Emissions (2005 PEI Section 3.4 excerpt) 

• Mobile Source: Locomotive Emissions (2005 PEI Section 3.6 excerpt) 

• Area Source: Residential, Commercial and Industrial Fuel Use (2005 PEI 

Section 4.5 excerpt) 
F - 1 

3.4 AIRCRAFT

Aircraft emissions were calculated using diverse databases along with other sources of 

information. 2005 CT DOT activity reports and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) activity 

reports from the largest airports (those with FAA control towers) were considered where 

possible. However, Connecticut survey data collected using the form shown in Attachment F-1 

generally provided aircraft specific LTOs and were considered to be of higher quality than other 

data sources. The airports in Connecticut having control towers are as follows. 

• Bradley International Airport 

• Danbury Municipal Airport 

• Groton-New London Airport 

• Hartford-Brainard Airport 

• Igor I. Sikorsky Memorial Airport 

• Tweed-New Haven Airport 

• Waterbury-Oxford Airport 

Table 3.4-1 provides a comparison between the Federal Aviation Administration’s Terminal 

Area Forecast (TAF) Data and available survey data. The Terminal Area Forecast System is the 

official forecast of aviation activity at FAA facilities, which includes historical data (years 2004 

and earlier) and future forecasts for the active airports in the National Plan of Integrated Airport 

System (NPIAS). This includes FAA towered airports, federally contracted towered airports, 

non-federal towered airports, and many non-towered airports. Airports that provided survey 

responses that had significantly different activity than reported in TAF were contacted to confirm 

appropriate LTO counts were used in the emissions estimates. 

The Bureau used the FAA's Emission and Dispersion Modeling System (EDMS) version 4.5 

software package to estimate emissions. In many cases the EDMS assigned a default engine to 

each type of aircraft, and each engine carried default emission factors. For exact survey response 

aircraft matches, the EDMS defaults were used. In other cases, research was required to assign 

the appropriate engine to the survey response. It is important to note that the engine assignment 

and not the specific aircraft model that defines the emission factors for each operating mode, 

multi-engine aircraft generate pollution at a proportional rate to the number of engines. 

Because of the correlation between temperature and pollution production, an effort was made to 

seasonally adjust the LTOs at each airport. Annual, summer (Ozone season) and winter (CO 

season) aircraft specific LTO data were obtained from survey results. This enabled the Bureau to 

calculate seasonal emissions directly for these airports. Connecticut Department of 

Transportation inputs were obtained for airports that did not supply seasonal LTO information. 

Seasonal adjustments were calculated for hospital and non-hospital helicopters and for fixed 

wing aircraft. Non-hospital helicopters and aircraft had increased activity during the summer 

and lowest activity in the winter, while hospital helicopter LTOs approximated uniform activity 

year round. 

The emission rates for aircraft vary at different stages (or modes) of each LTO cycle. The four 

LTO modes are Taxi/Idle-out/in, Takeoff, Climb out, and Approach. Each mode occurs for a 

fixed length of time depending on the category of aircraft (i.e., jumbo jet, helicopter, turboprop, 

etc.). The emission estimates used default time-in-mode values provided by the EDMS model. 

The EPA default assignment of 26 minutes for Taxi/Idle-out/in was applied to all airports, 

including Bradley International Airport. 
F - 2 

Table 3.4-2A and 3.4-2B show how the aircraft make and model survey results reported to DEP 

were matched to the EDMS aircraft/engine model assignments. Table 3.4-2A shows a 

consolidation of survey responses into a single common aircraft make model, while Table 3.4-2B 

shows composite emission factors of pounds of pollutant per LTO. Table 3.4-2B also shows the 

reported survey LTO count for the stated aircraft makes and models. LTO’s were apportioned 

when more than one EDMS aircraft/engine model combination was assigned to the survey 

aircraft make and model. Individual surveys and web-based sources, such as 

www.en.wikipedia.org ,www.risingup.com and www.airliners.net, were used and EDMS 

aircraft/engine emission estimates were reviewed to ensure reasonable assignments for the 

subject survey data. 

When available, the default EDMS engine for the aircraft was used for the survey response. 

Otherwise, a weighted assignment of engines was used. A good example showing this situation 

is the aircraft model “ERJ-135” model survey response, which was applied equally to ten engine 

types having similar but not identical emission factors listed for the EDMS 4.5 “Embraer ERJ 

135/140” aircraft. 

Reviewing the table for more extreme examples, it is possible to assess a range of emission 

factors assigned to the survey results. Looking at the links to the EDMS options available for the 

survey response of “Beechjet” in the Table 3.4-2 of the 2002 Periodic Emissions Inventory 

Document, it was possible to see that both the Beechjet 400 and the Beechjet 400A are two 

engine airplanes assigned an EDMS engine model of “JT15D-5 (A & B)” with identical emission 

factors. Given that both options provide identical results, the percentage of LTOs assigned to 

each model would have no impact on calculated emissions, therefore in the processing of 2005 

data the entries were combined to a single “Beechjet 400” listing. Consolidation of these similar 

survey responses are shown in Table 3.4-2A. The consolidation of numerous survey response 

aircraft make and models into a reduced set of aircraft make and models served to limit the size 

of Table 3.4-2B and to clarify interpretation of some of the inputs. For example the “Christian 

Eagle” was interpreted to be the “Christen Eagle” as the existence of a “Christian Eagle” could 

not be demonstrated. In contrast to airplane makes and models having the same emissions, a 

single aircraft could use many different engines having very different emission factors. The 

survey response of “C-135” presents an example of a single aircraft having a large range of 

emission factors. The survey response of “C-135” presents the largest range of emission factors 

for linked EDMS airplane makes and models due in part to it being a four-engine airplane. The 

minimum CO emission factor for “C-135” is 46.451 lb CO/ LTO for the “CFM56-2A SERIES” 

engine, while the maximum CO emission factor for “C-135” is 281.75 lb CO/ LTO for the 

“TF33-P-100” engine. In this “C-135” case, the percent applied for each link has an impact to 

calculated emissions. 6% was applied to the largest emission factor, while the balance of the 

percent applied to various emission factors that were lower than the maximum emission factor 

yielding a composite emission factor of 143.86 lb CO / LTO for “C-135”. Clearly, the emission 

factor could vary from 46.451 lb CO/ LTO to 281.75 lb CO/ LTO depending upon the engines 

used on the “C-135” performing the LTOs. This largest range of emission factors was selected 

to illustrate the widest possible difference in emission factors for the purpose of illustrating how 

the use of different engines on an airplane can influence the emission factor. This difference is 

extreme as the next widest range of emission factors was less than half the range of this “C-135” 
F - 3 

example. The two examples presented above illustrate that different EDMS assignments choices 

available for airplanes may or may not impact emission factors linked to a survey response. 

Table 3.4-2B shows the range of emission factors linked to aircraft make and model groups 

extracted from survey responses. Table 3.4-2A is not limited to showing aircraft survey 

responses having similar emissions. Some consolidations in Table 3.4-2A combine engines 

having different emission factors that were derived on a similar percentage population weighting 

system, the “Robinson R-22 Helicopter” would serve as such an example, while other entries 

serve to clarify the interpretation of the survey input based on EDMS 4.5 or information obtained 

from web searches. 

Table 3.4-2B also shows that the emission factor varies with engine model and number of 

engines on the airplane. When the number of engines cannot explain a difference in the 

presented emission factors for an engine model, it is usually due to the aircraft having different 

time-in-mode values. This is most pronounced when the same engine is used on helicopters and 

fixed wing aircraft. 

Survey inputs that indicated an aircraft or aircraft engine combination that were not included in 

EDMS 4.5 were either added as a user defined aircraft or matched to a best available EDMS 4.5 

entry or weighted combination EDMS 4.5 entries. User Defined aircraft can be identified in 

Table 3.4-2B as starting with two asterisks (i.e. **). **LifeStar (BK-117), **Robinson R-44, 

**Sikorsky S76, and **UH-1H Helicopter were User Defined aircraft added to the standard 

EDMS 4.5 aircraft options. The number of engine(s) and the associated engine are listed in 

Table 3.4-2B for these user defined aircraft. 

Emissions were calculated using a methodology consistent with the 1992 Procedures for 

Emission Inventory Preparation Document4

. The EDMS program returned emission estimates 

for each mode of operation. Internally, EDMS Mode 1 corresponds to approach, Mode 2 

corresponds to climb out, Mode 3 corresponds to takeoff, and Mode 4 corresponds to idle. The 

emissions for each mode were combined to obtain a composite emission factor for each LTO, 

which when multiplied by the number of LTOs for a given period yields emission results for that 

period. The LTO seasonal adjustments and unit conversions were factored in the following 

equation. 

Where: 

Eij = Total emissions of pollutant i, in pounds per day or tons per year, 

produced by aircraft type j for all LTO cycles 

LTOj = Annual Landing and Take-Off Cycles for aircraft type j. (If summer or 

winter emissions were sought, seasonal LTO Cycles for aircraft type j 

were used when known or seasonal LTO Cycles for aircraft type j were 

calculated from seasonal adjustment factors when not directly available 

from survey data.) 

TIMjk = Time in mode for mode k, in minutes, for aircraft type j 

E = LTO x TIM x1000/ FF x EI N x e CF/P / ij j jk jk ijk j
F - 4 

FFjk = Fuel flow for mode k, in pounds of fuel per minute, for each engine used 

on aircraft type j. 

EIijk = Emission index for pollutant i, in pounds of pollutant per thousand pounds 

of fuel, in mode k for aircraft type j 

1000 = 1000 pounds of fuel per thousand pounds of fuel conversion factor to 

balance the units of the equation (i.e. FFjk is in units of pounds of fuel per 

minute and Eijk is in units of pounds of pollutant per thousand pounds of 

fuel, dividing by 1000 lbs/thousand pounds of fuel balances the units of 

the equation). 

Nej = Number of engines used on aircraft type j 

P = Period which is 1 year if calculating annual emissions or is the number of 

days in Ozone or CO season if calculating a daily emission rate. 

CF = Conversion factor for balancing units when annual emissions are 

calculated, which is 2000 for annual calculations and 1 for seasonal 

calculations. The units for the equation are pounds per day for seasonal 

input, but are not tons per year for annual input. Consequently, it is 

necessary to divide by 2000 pounds per ton to obtain the desired annual 

units of tons per year. 

A sample calculation for CO emissions from Gulfstream II aircraft LTOs at Igor I. Sikorsky 

Memorial Airport in Fairfield County during the ozone season in 2005 was selected as an 

example, since it is powered by two engines (engine model is a Rolls Royce series SPEY 

MK511-8), which was included in Table 5-4 of the procedures document. This calculation 

cannot be matched to an output in Table 3.4-3, since Igor I. Sikorsky Memorial Airport has 

numerous other aircraft traffic. However, a discussion and information comparing the 1992 

Procedures Document and EDMS emission results is presented to illustrate how the EMDS 

methodology is consistent with the 1992 Procedures. 

TIMjk for a Gulfstream II jet can be obtained from Commercial Carrier Jumbo, long and medium 

range jet row of the 1992 Procedures for Emission Inventory Preparation Document4 Table 5-1 

or via EDMS table AIR_CAT row XCJX and is also shown on the Engine Emissions Tab of the 

EDMS Aircraft Operations & Assignments Form). The Parameters needed to calculate 

emissions were obtained from the 1992 Procedures Document and EDMS and presented below. 

This exercise confirmed consistency between EDMS and the 1992 Procedures Document for the 

SPEY MK511-8 aircraft engine. 
F - 5 

Mode 

EDMS 

4.2 

Mode 

Number

Time 

in 

Mode 

(Min) 

1992 

Procedures 

Document 

Fuel Flow 

(lb/min) 

EDMS 4.2 Fuel 

Flow 

converted 

from metric 

units from 

EDMS Table 

ENG_EI

1992 

Procedures 

Document 

CO 

Emission 

Rate 

(lb/1000 lb) 

EDMS 4.2 

CO 

Emission 

Rate 

From Table 

ENG_EI 

Takeoff 3 0.7 117.86 lb/min 117.86 lb/min 0.12 0.12

Climb out 2 2.2 96.03 lb/min 96.03 lb/min 0.63 0.63

Approach 1 4.0 36.77 lb/min 36.77 lb/min 2.65 2.65

Idle 4 26 16.80 lb/min 16.80 lb/min 31.77 31.77

A sample calculation for CO emissions from Gulfstream II LTOs at Igor I. Sikorsky Memorial 

Airport in Fairfield County during the ozone season in 2005 follows. 

Eij = 500 x [ ( 0.7 x 117.86 /1000 x 0.12 x 2) takeoff 

 + ( 2.2 x 96.03 /1000 x 0.63 x 2) climb out 

 + ( 4.0 x 36.77 /1000 x 2.65 x 2) approach 

 + ( 26 x 16.80 /1000 x 31.77 x 2)] /91 taxi/idle 

 

Eij = 500 x [ 28.820 ] / 91 All modes combined

Table 3.4-2B presents EDMS composite LTO emission factors. The EDMS composite LTO CO 

emission factor for the Gulfstream II is 28.814 lb per LTO, which compares well with the 28.820 

lb per LTO composite emission factor calculated above for all modes combined. EDMS was 

developed after 1992 and contains more engines and aircraft that contained in the 1992 

Procedures Document. 

CO 

day

lbs

E = ij 35.158 
TABLE 3.4-1 

Comparison of TAF Database Airports Activity versus Survey Data 

(Sorted by TAF Database Activity in Descending Order) 

F - 6 

FAA 

Location ID Airport Name 

TAF 

2005 LTO 

Estimate 

2005 

Survey 

Response 

BDL Bradley INTL Airport 78,580 78,985

HFD Hartford Brainard 54,981 45,500

DXR Danbury Municipal Airport 39,183 36,596

BDR Igor Sikorsky Memorial 34,741 33,712

HVN Tweed-New Haven 34,029 34,157

GON Groton New London 31,004 28,942

4B8 Robertson Field 29,600 29,550

OXC Waterbury Oxford 28,145 27,823

IJD Windham 15,345 9,025

SNC (1) Chester 10,400 2,410

5B3 Danielson 10,232 12,170

MMK Meriden Markham Municipal 9,014 10,024

22B (2) Mountain Meadow Airstrip 6,530 18

4B9 Simsbury 4,726 5,795

N04 Griswold 1,568 9,914

(1) Chester Airport was previously designated 3B9 but is now designated SNC. 

(2) Mountain Meadows Airport closed prior to 2005 and was not contained in 2005 FAA 

listings or web based references other than the TAF database. Mountain Meadows was not 

licensed for activity in 2005 and is no longer open to aircraft other than helicopters. 
TABLE 3.4-2A 

Grouping Modifications Made to 2005 Aircraft Survey Responses 

(Sorted by Modified Aircraft Make Model Name in Ascending Order) 

F - 7 

Modified Aircraft Make 

Model 

Listed in Table 3.4-2 

Survey Response Aircraft Make Model before 

Modification (Note that only modified names 

are listed) 

Adam Jets Jets Adam Jet 

Aeronca 7AC Aeronca Champ 

Mononca 7AC 

AH1 Helicopter Helicopter AH1 

Avanti Jets Jets Avanti 

Aviat A1 Husky 

Aviat A1A 

Aviat Aircraft Inc Husky A-1A 

Aviat Aircraft Inc Husky A-1B 

B-727-200 

B-727-200A 

B-727-200C 

B-727-200H 

B-727-2SH 

B-737-200 

Beech B19 Sport BEECHCRAFT BB19 MUSKETEER SPORT (1P) 

Beech Bonanza 

Beech 35 

Beech A-36 

Beech A36 IO-520 

Beech BE-33A 

Beech BE35 Bonanza 

Beech Bonanza 35 

Beech Bonanza U35A 

Beech C-33A IO-520 

Beech F33A 

Beech V-35B 

BEECHCRAFT B36T BONANZA (1T) 

BEECHCRAFT BE33 DEBONAIR/BONANZA (1P) 

BEECHCRAFT BE35 BONANZA (1P) 

BEECHCRAFT BE36 BONANZA (1P) 

Beechcraft Bonanza 

Bonanza’s 

Beech King Air 100 

BE-99 

Beech King Air 100 (PT6A-28) 

BEECHCRAFT BE10 KING AIR (2T) 

BEECHCRAFT BE99 AIRLINER (2T) 

BEECHCRAFT BE9L KING AIR (2T) 

BEECHCRAFT BE9T KING AIR (2T) 

Beechcraft Kingair F-90 

Beech King Air 200 Beech King Air 200 (PT6A-41) 
TABLE 3.4-2A 

Grouping Modifications Made to 2005 Aircraft Survey Responses 

(Sorted by Modified Aircraft Make Model Name in Ascending Order) 

F - 8 

Modified Aircraft Make 

Model 

Listed in Table 3.4-2 

Survey Response Aircraft Make Model before 

Modification (Note that only modified names 

are listed) 

Beech King Air 300 Beech King Air 300 (PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG) 

BEECHCRAFT BE30 SUPER KING AIR (2T+) 

Beech King Air 350 BEECHCRAFT B350 SUPER KING AIR (2T+) 

Beech King Air B200 Beech B200 King Air 

BEECHCRAFT BE20 SUPER KING AIR (2T+) 

Beech Queen Air 

BEECHCRAFT BE65 QUEEN AIR (2P) 

BEECHCRAFT BE70 QUEEN AIR (2P) 

BEECHCRAFT BE80 QUEEN AIR (2P) 

BEECHCRAFT BE88 QUEEN AIR (2P) 

Beechcraft 18 BEECHCRAFT BE18 TWIN BEECH (2P) 

Beechcraft D 18 

Beechcraft 1900 Beech 1900 

BEECHCRAFT B190 1900 (2T) 

Beechcraft Baron 

Barons 

BE-58 

Beech B-55 

Beech Baron 

Beech Baron BE55 

Beech BE55 

Beech E_55 

BEECHCRAFT BE55 BARON (2P) 

BEECHCRAFT BE56 TURBO BARON (2P) 

BEECHCRAFT BE58 BARON (2P) 

Beechcraft T-6 Texan BEECHCRAFT T6 0 (1P) 

T-6 

Beechjet 400 

BEECHCRAFT BE40 BEECHJET (2J+) 

Beechjet 

Beechjet 400 (JT15D-5 (A & B)) 

Bell 206 Helicopter 

Bell 206 (250B17B) 

Bell 206 B III 

Bell 407 Helicopter 

Bell Jet Ranger (Rolls-Royce C-20 Engine) 

Helicopter Bell 206 

HELO 

Jet Ranger Helicopter 

Single Engine Turbine Helicopter / Bell Jet Ranger 

Bellanca Citabria Bellanca 17-30 

Bellanca Jets Jets Bellanca 
TABLE 3.4-2A 

Grouping Modifications Made to 2005 Aircraft Survey Responses 

(Sorted by Modified Aircraft Make Model Name in Ascending Order) 

F - 9 

Modified Aircraft Make 

Model 

Listed in Table 3.4-2 

Survey Response Aircraft Make Model before 

Modification (Note that only modified names 

are listed) 

Bombardier Global Express Bombardier Global Ex 

C 130 Military Jets Jets C 130 Military 

Cessna 150 

Cessna 140A. Cessna 150 or O-200 equivalent 

Cessna 150 (O-200) 

Cessna 150H 

Cessna 150K 

Cessna C-150 

CESSNA C150 150 (1P) 

Cessna Cessna 150 

Piper Cub, Cessna 150 and other 80-125HP 

engines 

Cessna 152 

Cessna 152 O-235 

CESSNA C152 152 (1P) 

Cessna Cessna 152 

Cessna 170 

Cessna 170A 

Cessna 170B 

Cessna 170B 80C 

Cessna 170B 88C 

CESSNA C170 170 (1P) 

Cessna Cessna 170B 

Cessna 172 

C172 

Cessna C-172 

Cessna Cessna 172 

Cessna 172 Skyhawk (IO320) 

Cessna 172 or Piper PA-28 (IO-320-D1AD) 

Cessna 172 Skyhawk (IO-320-D1AD) 

Cessna 172 Skyhawk or Piper PA-28 (IO-320) 

Cessna 172 Skyhawk (IO360-B) 

Cessna 172 RG IO-320 

CESSNA C72R CUTLAS (1P) 

Cessna 172 Skyhawk (O320) 

CESSNA 172 - 150 HP LYCOMING 

Cessna 172 H 

Cessna 172 R&P O-320 

Cessna 172, Grumman AA-5b, Piper Cherokee 

140 or O-320 Eng Equivalent 

Cessna 172B 

Cessna 172I 

Cessna 172M 

Cessna Cessna 172B 

Cessna 180 Cessna 180B OBF 
TABLE 3.4-2A 

Grouping Modifications Made to 2005 Aircraft Survey Responses 

(Sorted by Modified Aircraft Make Model Name in Ascending Order) 

F - 10 

Modified Aircraft Make 

Model 

Listed in Table 3.4-2 

Survey Response Aircraft Make Model before 

Modification (Note that only modified names 

are listed) 

Cessna 185 

CESSNA C180 SKYWAGON (1P) 

CESSNA C185 SKYWAGON (1P) 

Cessna 182 

Cessna 182, Lancair, RV 8 and Bonanza 200-300 

HP Engines 

Cessna 182-J 

Cessna 182Q 

Cessna 182RG 

CESSNA C82R SKYLANE (1P) 

Cessna Skylane 

CESSNA 188 CESSNA C188 WAGON (1P) 

Cessna 195 Cessna C-195 

CESSNA 205 CESSNA C205 205 (1P) 

Cessna 206 Skywagon C206 

CESSNA C206 SKYWAGON/STATION AIR (1P) 

CESSNA 207 CESSNA C207 SKYWAGON/STATION AIR (1P) 

Cessna 208 Caravan 

C-208B 

Cesna Caravan 

CESSNA C208 CARAVAN/CARGOMASTER (1T) 

Cessna Caravan 

Cessna 210 CESSNA C210 CENTURIAN (1P) 

Cessna Centurion 11 210 

CESSNA 310 CESSNA C310 310 (2P) 

CESSNA 335 CESSNA C335 335 (2P) 

CESSNA 340 CESSNA C340 340 (2P) 

CESSNA 404 CESSNA C404 TITAN (2P) 

Cessna 414 Cessna 414 TISO-520 

CESSNA C414 CHANCELLOR (2P) 

CESSNA 425 CORSAIR CESSNA C425 CORSAIR/CONQUEST (2T) 

CESSNA C441 

CONQUEST CESSNA C441 CONQUEST (2T) 

CESSNA SKYMASTER CESSNA C336 SKYMASTER (2P) 

CESSNA C337 SKYMASTER (2P) 

Cessna T337 Cessna T337 (IO-360-B) 

CH-46 Helicopter Helicopter CH46 

CH-47 Helicopter Helicopter CH-47 

Challenger Jets Jets Challenger 

Cherokee six Piper Saratoga 
TABLE 3.4-2A 

Grouping Modifications Made to 2005 Aircraft Survey Responses 

(Sorted by Modified Aircraft Make Model Name in Ascending Order) 

F - 11 

Modified Aircraft Make 

Model 

Listed in Table 3.4-2 

Survey Response Aircraft Make Model before 

Modification (Note that only modified names 

are listed) 

PIPER P32R LANCE / SARATOGA (1P) 

Piper Saratoga T10-540 

Single Engine naturally aspirated similar to Piper 

Saratoga 

Cherokee six or TIO-540 

Eq 

Cessna 172, Cherokee six , TIO-540-J2B2 Eq. 

Cherokee six (IO-520/IO-540) 

Cherokee Six, Comanche, Mooney M20R or TIO540-J2B2 Eng Eq. 

Piper PA32R 

Piper Cherokee 6 

PIPER P32T TURBO LANCE (1P) 

PIPER PA32 CHEROKEE SIX / SARATOGA (1P) 

Christen Eagle Christian Eagle 

Christen Eagle II Experimental Christian Eagle II 

Cirrus SR20 CIRRUS SR20 SR-20 (1P) 

Cirrus SR22 CIRRUS SR22 SR-22 (1P) 

Citation Jets (Various) Jets Citation (Various) 

Comanche 

Comanche (IO-520/IO-540) 

Piper PA 24-250 

Piper PA-24 Commanche 

PIPER PA24 COMANCHE (1P) 

CRJ 701 CRJ-701 

Dash 7 / Global Express / 

etc. Jets Jets Dash 7 / Global Express / etc. 

DHC2 Beaver BEAVER DHC-2 - 450 HP PRATT&WHITNEY 

DHC-2 Bealer 450 Hp 

Dornier Jets Jets Dornier 

Embraer Jets (various) Jets Embraer (various) 

ERJ-170 ERJ 170 

Falcon 10 Jets Falcon 10 

Falcon 20 FA20 

Falcon 50 Falcon 50 (3 engine) 

Grumman AA 5-A Grumman AA 5-A 

Grumman AA 5-B Grumman AA 5-B 

Gulfstream II Gulf Stream G II 

Gulfstream III Gulf Stream G III 

Gulfstream IV Gulf Stream G IV 

Gulf Stream GIV 
TABLE 3.4-2A 

Grouping Modifications Made to 2005 Aircraft Survey Responses 

(Sorted by Modified Aircraft Make Model Name in Ascending Order) 

F - 12 

Modified Aircraft Make 

Model 

Listed in Table 3.4-2 

Survey Response Aircraft Make Model before 

Modification (Note that only modified names 

are listed) 

Gulfstream IV-V Gulfstream GIV-V 

Gulfstream Jets (Various) Jets Gulfstream (Various) 

Gulfstream V Gulf Stream G V 

H-60 Black Hawk 

H-60 

Helicopter UH-60 

Helicopter Various Experimental 

UH-60A 

UH-60D 

H-65 Helicopter Helicopter H-65 

Hawker 700 or Falcon 50 

like Jets Jet Aircraft like Hawker 700 or Falcon 50 

Hawker Jets Jets Hawker 

Hughes Helicopter 500C Hugh’s Helicopter 500C 

Husky Jets Jets Husky 

IO-360-B Eng. Eq. 

Beech C-23, Sundowner, Cessna 172 Skyhawk, 

Mooney M20, Piper Cherokee 180 or IO-360-B 

Eng. Eq. 

Piper Archer 

Piper Archer II 

Piper 180 

Piper 181 

Piper 200R 

Piper Archer 

Piper Cherokee 180 

Lear Jets (Various) Jets Lear (Various) 

Learjet 35 LR-35 

Learjet 35/36 LR-35/36 

Learjet 35A LR-35A 

Learjet 35B LR-35B 

Learjet 60 LR-60 

LifeStar 

American Eurocopter BK-117 

BK117 Eurocopter 

BK-117 Helicopter 

Life Star Helicopter 

Lifestar Helicopter 

MBB BK-117 

Maule Cessna Maule 

Maule 180-210-225 
TABLE 3.4-2A 

Grouping Modifications Made to 2005 Aircraft Survey Responses 

(Sorted by Modified Aircraft Make Model Name in Ascending Order) 

F - 13 

Modified Aircraft Make 

Model 

Listed in Table 3.4-2 

Survey Response Aircraft Make Model before 

Modification (Note that only modified names 

are listed) 

Maule MT-7-235 

Maule MTA 

Maule Jets Jets Maul 

Mooney M-20 

Mooney M20 

Mooney M-20C 

Mooney Single Engine 

Mooney w Textron Engine Textron Mooney 

Not Listed Hot Air Ballon Take-offs 

Navajo (Twin Engine TIO540-J2B2) 

Navajo (IO-520/IO-540) 

Navajo (twin TIO-540-J2B2) 

O-320 Eng Eq. 

Cessna 172 Skyhawk, Grumman AA-5b, Piper 

Cherokee 140 or O-320 Eng Eq. 

Piper PA 140 Cherokee 

Piper PA140 Cherokee 

Piper Cherokee 140 

P-337P Skymaster (Twin 

Engine TSIO-360C) P-337P Skymaster (TSIO-360C) 

Pilatus Jets Jets Pilatus 

Piper Aztec 

Aztec (TIO-540-J2B2) 

Piper Aztech 

PIPER PA27 AZTEC (2P) 

Piper Cheyenne PIPER PAY1 CHEYENNE 1 (2T) 

Twin Engine Turbine Piper Cheyenne 

Piper Cub 

Piper J-5A Cub 

Piper J3-Cub 

Piper Cubs 

Piper J-3 

Piper J3 Cub 

Piper J-3 Cub 

PIPER PA-11 - 85 HP CONTINENTAL 

PIPER PA11 CUB SPECIAL (1P) 

Piper PA12 

PIPER PA12 SUPER CRUISER (1P) 

Piper PA 28-140 Piper PA 28-140 

Piper PA 28-161 Piper PA 28-161 

Piper PA-18 Supercub 

PA-18 Supercub 180 Hp 

PIPER PA18 SUPER CUB (1P) 

PIPER PA-18-180 - 180 HP LYCOMING 
TABLE 3.4-2A 

Grouping Modifications Made to 2005 Aircraft Survey Responses 

(Sorted by Modified Aircraft Make Model Name in Ascending Order) 

F - 14 

Modified Aircraft Make 

Model 

Listed in Table 3.4-2 

Survey Response Aircraft Make Model before 

Modification (Note that only modified names 

are listed) 

Piper PA-25 Pawnee Piper PA25 

PIPER PA25 PAWNEE (1P) 

Piper PA-31T Cheyenne PA-31T Cheyenne 

PA-31T Cheyenne (PT6A-28) 

Piper PA-42 Cheyenne PA-42 Cheyenne (PT6A-41) 

PIPER PA46 MALIBU PIPER PA46 NMALIBU / MIRAGE (1P) 

Piper Seneca 

Piper PA-34-200 

Piper Seneca 

PIPER PA34 SENECA (2P) 

Piper Warrior Piper Warrior IO-320 

Piper Warrior PA-28 

Pit Special Jets Jets Pit Special 

Robinson R-22 Helicopter 

Helicopter Robinson R22 

R-22 (Helicopter) 

Robinson R22 

Robinson R-22 

Robinson R22 (IO-320-D1AD) 

Robinson R22 (IO-360-B) 

Robinson R22 (O-320) 

Robinson R22 / Sikorski S52 

Robinson R-22-R44 

Helicopter Robinson Helicopter R22-R44 

Robinson R-44 Helicopter 

Helicopter R44 

Robinson Helicopter R-44 Clipper II 

Robinson R-44 

SAAB 340 SF340 

Saberliner 75A Jets Sabreliner 

Saberliner 

SH-33 Helicopter Helicopter SH-33 

Sikorsky S-76 Helicopter 

Helicopter Sikorsky SK 76 

Other at JSD Heliport 

S-76 

S76 Helicopter 

Sikorski S-76C+ 

Sikorsky 76B (S-76B) 

Sikorsky S76 

Sikorsky S-76 

Sikorsky S76 (PT6B-36A) 
TABLE 3.4-2A 

Grouping Modifications Made to 2005 Aircraft Survey Responses 

(Sorted by Modified Aircraft Make Model Name in Ascending Order) 

F - 15 

Modified Aircraft Make 

Model 

Listed in Table 3.4-2 

Survey Response Aircraft Make Model before 

Modification (Note that only modified names 

are listed) 

Sikorsky S76 C+ 

Sikorsky S76 Helicopter 

Sikorsky S76B 

Sikorsky S-76B N61CP/N22CP Sikorsky S-92 

Sikorsky S-76C+ 

Sikorsky S-92 Helicopter S-92 

Sikorsky S-92 

Socata TBM 700 Jets TBM 

TBM 

Stinson Voyager Stinson 

Stinson Vorage 

Taylor Craft Tailor craft 

Tcraft 

Twin Comanche PIPER PA30 TWIN COMANCHEE (2P) 

Twin Comanche (IO-320-D1AD) 

UH-1 Helicopter Helicopter UH-1 

Hughie Helicopter 

UH-1H Helicopter UH-1H 

Ultralights 

Assorted Ultralights 

Ultra Lights 

Ultralight 

Ultralights, Mixed 

Ultralites 

West Wind Jets West Wind 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 16 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

328JET 1012 100 Dornier 328JET PW306B 2 

330 Shorts 14 100 Shorts 330 PT6A-45R 2 500 Citation (JT15D-1A & 1B) 53 100 500 Citation JT15D-1A & 1B 2 550 Citation (JT15D-4 (B,C,D)) 94 100 550 Citation JT15D-4 (B,C,D) 2 552 Citation (JT15D-4 (B,C,D)) 63 100 552 Citation JT15D-4 (B,C,D) 2 A-10A Thunderbolt II 1433 100 A-10A Thunderbolt II TF34-GE-100-100A 2 A-300 753 50 A300-600 CF6-80C2A5F 2 

10 A300-B4 CF6-80C2A5 (revised) 2 10 A300-B4 JT9D-59A 2 10 A300-B4-605R CF6-80C2A5 2 

5 A300-600F CF6-80E1A4 Low Emis 2 5 A300B CF6-80C2A5 2 5 A300-B4-100 CF6-50C2 2 5 A300-B4-200 CF6-50C2 2 

A-300-600 557 100 A300-600 CF6-80C2A5F 2 A-300B4 277 90 A300-B4 CF6-80C2A5 2 

5 A300-600 CF6-80C2A5F 2 5 A300-B4 JT9D-59A 2 

A-310 394 100 A310 CF6-80A3 2 A319 2696 100 A319 CFM56-5B6/P 2 A319/A320 1 50 A319 CFM56-5B6/P 2 

50 A320 V2527-A5 2 

A320 2587 100 A320 V2527-A5 2 A321 888 100 A321 CFM56-5B3/P 2 A5355F1 / Eurocopter 34 100 **Sikorsky S76 PT6A-36 2 Adam Jets 140 100 500 Citation JT15D-1A & 1B 2 Aeronca 90 60 Cessna 150 O-200 1 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 17 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

15 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-320-D1AD 1 15 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 10 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 

Aeronca 7AC 202 100 Cessna 150 O-200 1 Aeronca 7EC 91 100 Cessna 150 O-200 1 Aeronca Chief 50 100 Cessna 150 O-200 1 Aerospatial 320-B 500 100 ATR42 PW120 2 Agusta SPA/A109E 1 100 Galaxy (IAI) G200 PW306A 2 AH1 Helicopter 70 25 AH-1J Cobra T400-CP-400 2 

25 AH-1S Cobra T53-L-11D 2 25 AH-1S Cobra T53-L-13 2 25 AH-1W Super Cobra T700-GE-401 -401C 2 

All(Mostly Single Engine) 1500 40 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 

25 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-320-D1AD 1 20 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 13 Cessna 150 O-200 1 

2 Aztec TIO-540-J2B2 2 

American Champion Aircraft 8K CAB 155 60 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 

20 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 20 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-320-D1AD 1 

Avanti Jets 70 100 500 Citation JT15D-1A & 1B 2 Aviat A1 Husky 191 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 B-727 18 34 B727-100 JT8D-9A 3 B-727 18 33 B727-100C TAY 651 (Transply) 3 

33 B727-200 JT8D-15 3 

B-727-200 964 80 B727-200 JT8D-15 3 

10 B727-200F JT8D-15 3 

5 B727-200RE JT8D-217C 3 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 18 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

5 B727-200RF JT8D-217C 3 

B-737-300 5293 100 B737-300 CFM56-3-B1 2 B-737-400 919 100 B737-400 CFM56-3B-2 2 B-737-500 769 100 B737-500 CFM56-3C-1 2 B-737-700 5287 100 B737-700 CFM56-7B22 2 B-737-800 1235 100 B737-800 CFM56-7B26 2 B-757 5332 35 B757-200 PW2037 2 

35 B757-200F RB211-535E4 2 

5 B757-300 PW2040 2 5 B757-300 PW2043 2 5 B757-300 RB211-535E4 PHASE 5 2 5 B757-300 RB211-535E4B 2 5 B757-300 RB211-535E4B old com 2 5 B757-300 RB211-535E4B PHASE5 2 

B-757-200PF 917 100 B757-200F RB211-535E4 2 B-767 240 18 B767-200ER CF6-80A2 2 

18 B767-300 CF6-80A2 2 18 B767-300ER PW4060 2 18 B767-300F CF6-80C2B7F 2 18 B767-400ER CF6-80C2B8FA 2 

5 B767-200 CF6-80C2A5 (revised) 2 5 B767-200 CF6-80E1A4 Low Emis 2 

B767-200 151 35 B767-200ER CF6-80A2 2 

20 B767-200 CF6-80E1A4 Low Emis 2 15 B767-200 CF6-80CB42 2 15 B767-200 CF6-80C2A5 (revised) 2 15 B767-200 CF6-80E1A3 2 

B-767-300 171 34 B767-300 CF6-80A2 2 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 19 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

33 B767-300ER PW4060 2 33 B767-300F CF6-80C2B7F 2 

B-767-300E 45 100 B767-300ER PW4060 2 Beech A36 Turbine 156 100 Beech King Air 100 PT6A-28 2 Beech B19 Sport 161 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 Beech Bonanza 6434 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 Beech King Air 4273 20 Beech King Air 100 PT6A-28 2 

20 Beech King Air 200 PT6A-41 2 20 Beech King Air 300 PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG 2 20 Beech King Air 350 PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG 2 10 Beech King Air 90 PT6A-28 2 10 Beech King Air B200 PT6A-41 2 

Beech King Air 100 658 100 Beech King Air 100 PT6A-28 2 Beech King Air 200 293 100 Beech King Air 200 PT6A-41 2 Beech King Air 300 363 100 Beech King Air 300 PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG 2 Beech King Air 350 70 100 Beech King Air 350 PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG 2 Beech King Air B200 215 100 Beech King Air B200 PT6A-41 2 Beech Queen Air 1570 100 Aztec TIO-540-J2B2 2 Beech Sundowner, Cessna 172, Mooney, or IO360-B E 3982 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 Beechcraft 18 144 100 Aztec TIO-540-J2B2 2 Beechcraft 1900 2740 75 BH-1900 PT6A-67D 2 

25 BH-1900C PT6A-65B 2 

Beechcraft Baron 6457 100 Navajo TIO-540-J2B2 2 BEECHCRAFT BE17 TRAVELER/STAGGER WING (1P)

70 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 

BEECHCRAFT BE23 MUSKETEER/SUNDOWNER (1P)

70 50 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 20 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

50 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 

BEECHCRAFT BE24 MUSKETEER SUPER/SIERRA (1P)

70 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 

BEECHCRAFT BE60 DUKE (2P) 70 100 Navajo TIO-540-J2B2 2 BEECHCRAFT BE76 DUCHESS (2P) 70 100 Cessna T337 IO-360-B 2 BEECHCRAFT BE77 SKIPPER (1P) 70 75 Cessna 150 O-200 1 

25 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 

BEECHCRAFT BE95 TRAVEL AIR (2P) 70 100 Cessna T337 IO-360-B 2 Beechcraft Sundowner 91 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 BEECHCRAFT T34P MENTOR (1P) 70 75 Cessna 150 O-200 1 

25 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 

BEECHCRAFT T34T TURBOMENTOR (1T) 70 100 Equator P-550 Turbo PT6A-27 1 Beechcraft T-6 Texan 70 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 Beechjet 400 727 100 Beechjet 400 JT15D-5 (A & B) 2 Bell 206 Helicopter 5141 100 Bell 206 250B17B 1 Bellanca Citabria 141 34 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 

33 Cessna 150 O-200 1 33 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 

Bellanca Jets 70 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 Boeing A75N1 91 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 Bombardier Challenger 300 265 20 CL600 CF34-3B 2 

20 CL600S ALF 502L-2 2 20 CL601-3A CF34-3A 2 20 CL601-3R CF34-3A 2 20 CL604 CF34-3B 2 

Bombardier Challenger 600 265 20 CL600 CF34-3B 2 

20 CL600S ALF 502L-2 2 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 21 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

20 CL601-3A CF34-3A 2 20 CL601-3R CF34-3A 2 20 CL604 CF34-3B 2 

Bombardier Global Express 2942 100 Bombardier Global Ex BR700-710A2-20 2 C 130 Military Jets 70 17 C-130 HERCULES T56 series I 4 

17 C-130 HERCULES T56-A-15 4 17 C-130 HERCULES T56 series III 4 17 C-130 HERCULES 501D22A 4 16 C-130 HERCULES T56-A-9 4 16 C-130 HERCULES T56-A-16 4 

C Citation (JT15D-4 (B,C,D)) 53 100 C Citation JT15D-4 (B,C,D) 2 C-135 14 7 C-135 TF33-P-5&9 4 

7 C-135 J57-P-22 4 7 C-135 F108-CF-100 4 7 C-135 F103-GE-100 & 101 4 6 C-135B TF33-P-7 4 6 C-135B F108-CF-100 4 6 C-135B TF33-P-100 4 6 C-135B TF33-P-102&102A 4 6 C-135B TF33-P-3/103 4 6 C-135B TF33-P3/5/7 4 6 C-135B TF33-P-5&9 4 6 C-135FR TF33-P-5&9 4 6 C-135FR F108-CF-100 4 6 C-135FR CFM56-2B-1 4 6 C-135FR CFM56-2A SERIES 4 6 C-135FR CFM56-2B 4 

C-150-172-182 Piper 53 PA 28 Stearman PT17 750 30 Cessna 150 O-200 1 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 22 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

Maule F

25 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 15 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-320-D1AD 1 15 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 15 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 

C-17 10 34 C-17A PW2041 4 

33 C-17A F117-PW-100 4 33 C-17A PW2040 4 

Canadair Challenger 500 97 CL600 CF34-3B 2 

2 CL600S ALF 502L-2 2 1 CL600 ALF 502L-2 2 

Canadair CL-600/CRT-200 1200 97 CL600 CF34-3B 2 

2 CL600S ALF 502L-2 2 1 CL600 ALF 502L-2 2 

Cessna 140 20 100 Cessna 150 O-200 1 Cessna 150 12835 100 Cessna 150 O-200 1 Cessna 152 3821 75 Cessna 150 O-200 1 

25 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 

Cessna 170 819 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 Cessna 172 17432 34 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 

33 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-320-D1AD 1 33 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 

Cessna 172 Skyhawk (IO-320) 4087 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-320-D1AD 1 Cessna 172 Skyhawk (IO-360-B) 6474 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 Cessna 172 Skyhawk (O-320) 25961 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 Cessna 172, Piper Warrior and other 150-180HP Lyco

3650 34 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 

33 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 33 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-320-D1AD 1 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 23 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

Cessna 180 975 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 

Cessna 182 7713 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 CESSNA 188 140 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 Cessna 192Q 9HA 10 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 Cessna 195 90 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 CESSNA 205 70 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 Cessna 206 Skywagon 150 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 CESSNA 207 140 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 Cessna 208 Caravan 4297 100 Cessna 208 Caravan PT6A-114 1 Cessna 210 785 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 CESSNA 310 70 100 Aztec TIO-540-J2B2 2 CESSNA 335 70 100 Aztec TIO-540-J2B2 2 CESSNA 340 70 100 Aztec TIO-540-J2B2 2 CESSNA 404 70 100 Aztec TIO-540-J2B2 2 Cessna 414 670 100 Aztec TIO-540-J2B2 2 Cessna 421 GTISO-520 1900 100 Aztec TIO-540-J2B2 2 CESSNA 425 CORSAIR 70 20 King Air B200 PT6A-41 2 

20 PA-31T Cheyenne PT6A-28 2 20 PA-42 Cheyenne PT6A-41 2 20 Shorts 360 PT6A-65AR 2 20 Shorts 360 PT6A-65R 2 

Cessna 550 1000 100 550 Citation JT15D-4 (B,C,D) 2 CESSNA C172 SKYHAWK/CUTLASS (1P) 280 50 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 

25 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-320-D1AD 1 25 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 

CESSNA C175 SKYLARK (1P) 140 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 CESSNA C177 CARDINAL (1P) 140 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 Cessna C-177RG 90 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 24 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

CESSNA C402 UTILILINER/BUSINESSLINER (2P)

70 100 Aztec TIO-540-J2B2 2 

CESSNA C421 GOLDEN EAGLE (2P) 70 100 Aztec TIO-540-J2B2 2 CESSNA C441 CONQUEST 70 100 Cessna 441 Conquest2 TPE331-8 2 CESSNA C77R CARDINAL (1P) 140 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 Cessna Citation 265 26 551 Citation JT15D-4 (B,C,D) 2 

25 552 Citation JT15D-4 (B,C,D) 2 25 552 Citation JT15D-5 (A & B) 2 

6 Citation Sovereign PW308C 2 6 Citation Ultra JT15D-5C 2 6 Citation VII TFE731-3 2 6 CITATION X AE3007C (Type 1) 2 

Cessna Citation - Bravo 265 100 Citation Bravo JT15D-4 (B,C,D) 2 Cessna Citation 500 1000 100 500 Citation JT15D-1A & 1B 2 Cessna Citation CJ# 265 100 CITATION X AE3007C (Type 1) 2 Cessna Citation Excel 1265 100 Citation Sovereign PW308C 2 Cessna Citation V-X 500 100 560 Citation V JT15D-5 (A & B) 2 Cessna Citation XL 265 50 560 Citation V JT15D-5 (A & B) 2 

50 CITATION X AE3007C (Type 1) 2 

Cessna Skyhawk 172/182 6000 50 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 

50 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 

CESSNA SKYMASTER 70 100 P-337P Skymaster TSIO-360C 2 Cessna T337 1957 100 Cessna T337 IO-360-B 2 Cessna’s 150-152-172-175-182-195 1000 20 Cessna 150 O-200 1 

20 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 20 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-320-D1AD 1 20 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 20 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 25 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

Cessna’s 180-206-210-Caravans 350 75 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 

25 Cessna 208 Caravan PT6A-114 1 

CH-46 Helicopter 70 100 H-46E SEA KNIGHT T58-GE-16 2 CH-47 Helicopter 561 80 H-53J Pave Low T64-GE-100 2 

20 AH-1S Cobra T53-L-13 2 

CH-47D 22 80 H-53J Pave Low T64-GE-100 2 

20 AH-1S Cobra T53-L-13 2 

Challenger Jets 70 20 CL600 CF34-3B 2 

20 CL600S ALF 502L-2 2 20 CL601-3A CF34-3A 2 20 CL601-3R CF34-3A 2 20 CL604 CF34-3B 2 

Challengers, Citations 324 50 CITATION X AE3007C (Type 1) 2 

25 Citation VII TFE731-3 2 25 S550 Citation JT15D-4 (B,C,D) 2 

Cherokee six 1317 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 Cherokee six or TIO-540 Eq 2406 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 Chinock C-47D 184 93 H-53D Sea Stallion T64-GE-413 2 

7 H-60 Black Hawk T700-GE-700 2 

Chinook Helicopter 4 80 H-53J Pave Low T64-GE-100 2 

20 AH-1S Cobra T53-L-13 2 

Chipmunk 1 100 Cessna 150 O-200 1 Christen Eagle 50 50 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 

50 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 

Christen Eagle II 90 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 Cirrus SR20 140 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 Cirrus SR22 231 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 CITATION I (JT15D-1A & 1B) 132 100 CITATION I JT15D-1A & 1B 2 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 26 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

Citation Jets (Various) 841 5 500 Citation JT15D-1A & 1B 2 

5 550 Citation JT15D-4 (B,C,D) 2 5 551 Citation JT15D-4 (B,C,D) 2 5 552 Citation JT15D-5 (A & B) 2 5 552 Citation JT15D-4 (B,C,D) 2 5 560 Citation V JT15D-5 (A & B) 2 5 C Citation JT15D-4 (B,C,D) 2 5 Citation Bravo JT15D-4 (B,C,D) 2 5 CITATION I JT15D-1A & 1B 2 5 CITATION I SP JT15D-1A & 1B 2 5 CITATION II JT15D-4 (B,C,D) 2 5 CITATION II SP JT15D-4 (B,C,D) 2 5 CITATION SII JT15D-4 (B,C,D) 2 5 Citation Sovereign PW308C 2 5 Citation Ultra JT15D-5C 2 5 Citation Ultra JT15D-5 (A & B) 2 4 CITATION T-47A JT15D-4 (B,C,D) 2 4 CITATION V JT15D-5 (A & B) 2 4 Citation VII TFE731-3 2 4 CITATION X AE3007C (Type 1) 2 4 S550 Citation JT15D-4 (B,C,D) 2 

Citation SII JT-15-D 700 100 CITATION SII JT15D-4 (B,C,D) 2 CITATION V (JT15D-5 (A & B)) 63 100 CITATION V JT15D-5 (A & B) 2 Comanche 2054 100 Comanche TIO-540-J2B2 1 CRJ 200 3278 100 REG'L JET 200 CF34-3B 2 CRJ 701 785 100 Bombardier CRJ700 CF34-8C1 2 Dash 7 / Global Express / etc. Jets 1402 50 Bombardier Global Ex BR700-710A2-20 2 

50 Dash 7 PT6A-50 4 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 27 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

Dash 8 867 25 Dash 8-100 PW120A 2 

25 Dash 8-200 PW123D 2 25 Dash 8-300 PW123 2 25 Dash 8-400 PW123 2 

Dassault Falcon 200 500 50 Falcon 20 CF700-2D 2 

50 Falcon 2000EX PW308C 2 

Dassault Falcon 50, 200, 900, 2000 250 25 Falcon 100 TFE731-2 2 

25 Falcon 20 CF700-2D 2 25 Falcon 2000EX PW308C 2 25 Falcon 50 TFE731-3 3 

DC10-10 14 75 DC10-10 CF6-6K 3 

10 DC10-10F CF6-6D 3 

5 DC10-10C CF6-6K2 3 5 DC10-10C CF6-6K 3 5 DC10-10C CF6-6D 3 

DC10-30 7 74 DC10-30 CF6-50C2 3 

2 DC10-30C CF6-50C2 3 2 DC10-30C CF6-50C2 non-LEFN 3 2 DC10-30C CF6-50C2R 3 2 DC10-30C CF6-50C2R non-LEFN 3 2 DC10-30C CF6-50CA 3 2 DC10-30C CF6-50E1 3 2 DC10-30C CF6-50E2 3 2 DC10-30C CF6-50E2 (non-LEFN) 3 2 DC10-30C CF6-50E2B 3 2 DC10-30C CF6-50C non-LEFN 3 2 DC10-30CF Series CF6-50C2 3 2 DC10-30ER CF6-50C2B 3 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 28 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

2 DC10-30F CF6-50C2 3 

DC8-71F 183 34 DC8-71F CFM56-2B-1 4 

33 DC8-71F CFM56-2A SERIES 4 33 DC8-71F CFM56-2B 4 

DC8-73F 81 34 DC8-73F CFM56-2B-1 4 

33 DC8-73F CFM56-2A SERIES 4 33 DC8-73F CFM56-2B 4 

DC-9 221 20 DC9-15F JT8D-7B 2 

20 DC9-20 JT8D-11 2 

5 DC9-10 JT8D-7 2 5 DC9-10 JT8D-7A 2 5 DC9-10 JT8D-7B 2 5 DC9-10 JT8D-7series OldCom 2 5 DC9-10C JT8D-7 2 5 DC9-10C JT8D-7B 2 5 DC9-10C JT8D-7A 2 5 DC9-10C JT8D-7series OldCom 2 4 DC9-10F JT8D-7series OldCom 2 4 DC9-10F JT8D-7B 2 4 DC9-10F JT8D-7A 2 4 DC9-10F JT8D-7 2 4 DC9-10F JT8D-9series OldCom 2 

DC9-31 3 50 DC9-30 JT8D-7B 2 

50 DC9-30F JT8D-9A 2 

DC9-31A 6 50 DC9-30 JT8D-7B 2 

50 DC9-30F JT8D-9A 2 

DC9-32 209 50 DC9-30 JT8D-7B 2 

50 DC9-30F JT8D-9A 2 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 29 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

DC9-33 34 50 DC9-30 JT8D-7B 2 

50 DC9-30F JT8D-9A 2 

DeHavilland Dash 8-100 2190 100 Dash 8-100 PW120A 2 DHC2 Beaver 212 100 Comanche TIO-540-J2B2 1 DIAMOND DA42 TWINSTAR (1P) 140 100 Cessna T337 IO-360-B 2 DIAMOND DV10 DIAMONDSTAR (1P) 140 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 DIAMOND DV20 KATANA (1P) 140 100 Cessna 150 O-200 1 DIAMOND GA7 COUGAR (2P) 70 100 Twin Comanche IO-320-D1AD 2 Dornier Jets 70 80 Dornier 328JET PW306B 2 

20 Canadair Reg-700 CF34-8C1 2 

EMB-145 83 50 Embraer ERJ 145LR AE3007A1/3 (Type 1) 2 

25 Embraer ERJ 145 AE3007A 2 25 Embraer ERJ 145 AE3007A1E 2 

Embraer Jets (various) 280 8 Embraer ERJ 145 AE3007A1E 2 

8 Embraer ERJ 145 AE3007A 2 8 Embraer ERJ 145LR AE3007A1/3 (Type 1) 2 7 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A1/3 (Type 2) 2 7 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A1/3 2 7 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A1/3 (Type 3) 2 7 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A1P (Type 1) 2 7 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A1P (Type 2) 2 7 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A1P (Type 3) 2 7 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A1/3 (Type 1) 2 6 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A3 (Type 3) 2 6 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A3 (Type 2) 2 6 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A3 (Type 1) 2 5 Embraer ERJ 170 CF34-8E5A1 2 4 Embraer ERJ 170 CF34-8E5 2 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 30 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

ERJ-135 1018 10 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A1/3 (Type 2) 2 

10 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A3 (Type 3) 2 10 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A3 (Type 2) 2 10 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A3 (Type 1) 2 10 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A1P (Type 3) 2 10 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A1P (Type 2) 2 10 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A1/3 (Type 3) 2 10 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A1/3 (Type 1) 2 10 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A1/3 2 10 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A1P (Type 1) 2 

ERJ-140 345 10 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A1/3 (Type 3) 2 

10 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A3 (Type 3) 2 10 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A3 (Type 2) 2 10 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A3 (Type 1) 2 10 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A1P (Type 3) 2 10 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A1P (Type 2) 2 10 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A1/3 (Type 2) 2 10 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A1/3 (Type 1) 2 10 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A1/3 2 10 Embraer ERJ 135/140 AE3007A1P (Type 1) 2 

ERJ-145 6982 34 Embraer ERJ 145 AE3007A 2 

33 Embraer ERJ 145 AE3007A1E 2 33 Embraer ERJ 145LR AE3007A1/3 (Type 1) 2 

ERJ-170 1616 50 Embraer ERJ 170 CF34-8E5 2 

50 Embraer ERJ 170 CF34-8E5A1 2 

Experimental Exp. Zodiac 91 100 Cessna 150 O-200 1 Experimental Glassair III 90 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 Experimental GlassAir RG 180 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 31 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

Experimental RV 6 90 50 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 

50 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 

Experimental Sonerai II 90 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 Extra EA - 300 45 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 F15/16 4 25 F-15 F100-PW-100 2 

25 F-15 F100-PW-100 (w/AB) 2 25 F-16 F100-PW-100 1 25 F-16 F100-PW-100 (w/AB) 1 

Fairchild 24 20 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 Falcon 10 335 100 Falcon 100 TFE731-2 2 Falcon 20 269 100 Falcon 20 CF700-2D 2 Falcon 2000 1056 100 Falcon 2000EX PW308C 2 Falcon 50 2103 100 Falcon 50 TFE731-3 3 Falcon 900 927 100 Falcon 2000EX PW308C 2 Fleet 1 15 100 Cessna 150 O-200 1 Grumman A-5A 91 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 Grumman AA 5-A 91 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 Grumman AA 5-B 91 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 Grumman AA-5 91 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 Grumman Tiger 2891 100 Rockwell Commander IO-360-B 1 Gulfstream II 765 100 Gulfstream II SPEY MK511-8 2 Gulfstream II or III 3239 50 Gulfstream II SPEY MK511-8 2 

50 Gulfstream III SPEY MK511-8 2 

Gulfstream III 965 100 Gulfstream III SPEY MK511-8 2 Gulfstream IV 6212 100 Gulfstream IV TAY Mk611-8 2 Gulfstream IV-V 500 50 Gulfstream IV TAY Mk611-8 2 

50 Gulfstream V BR700-710A1-10 GulfV 2 

Gulfstream Jets (Various) 140 16 Gulfstream I RDa7 2 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 32 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

16 Gulfstream II SPEY MK511-8 2 16 Gulfstream III SPEY MK511-8 2 16 Gulfstream IV TAY Mk611-8 2 16 Gulfstream V BR700-710A1-10 GulfV 2 10 Gulfstream G350/G450 TAY 611-8C 2 10 Gulfstream G550 BR700-710C4-11 2 

Gulfstream V 3497 100 Gulfstream V BR700-710A1-10 GulfV 2 H-3 52 100 H-3 SEA KING T58-GE-8F 2 H53 12 20 H-53D Sea Stallion T64-GE-413 2 

20 H-53D Sea Stallion T64-GE-415 2 20 H-53D Sea Stallion T64-GE-6B 2 20 H-53E Stallion T64-GE-100 3 20 H-53J Pave Low T64-GE-100 2 

H-60 Black Hawk 2954 100 H-60 Black Hawk T700-GE-700 2 H-65 Helicopter 70 100 SH-60B Seahawk T700-GE-401 -401C 2 Hawker 400 265 100 Hawker Horizon PW308A 2 Hawker 700 793 100 Citation VII TFE731-3 2 Hawker 700 or Falcon 50 like Jets 25 100 Falcon 50 TFE731-3 3 Hawker 800 1322 100 Hawker Horizon PW308A 2 Hawker 800XP 265 100 Hawker Horizon PW308A 2 Hawker Jets 140 60 Citation VII TFE731-3 2 

40 Hawker Horizon PW308A 2 

Hawker XP 265 100 Hawker Horizon PW308A 2 Hawkers, Navajos 324 50 Citation VII TFE731-3 2 

25 Hawker Horizon PW308A 2 25 Navajo TIO-540-J2B2 2 

Hughes Helicopter 500C 150 50 Bell 206 250B17B 1 

50 OH-6 Cayuse 250B17B 1 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 33 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

Husky Jets 70 100 KC-135B JT3D-7 SERIES 4 

IAI Westwind 486 100 IAI Westwind TFE731-3 2 IAI WW 24 300 100 IAI Westwind TFE731-3 2 IO-360-B Eng. Eq. 12391 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 Kaman H-43 Helicopter 72 100 UH-1N Iroquois T400-CP-400 1 Kaman K-1200 Helicopter 120 100 AH-1S Cobra T53-L-13 2 Kaman SH-2 Helicopter 200 50 H-2 SEASPRITE T58-GE-8F 2 

50 H-2 Super Seasprite T700-GE-401 -401C 2 

Lear 45 265 100 Learjet 35/36 TFE 731-2-2B 2 Lear Jets (Various) 561 70 Learjet 35/36 TFE 731-2-2B 2 

15 Dornier 328JET PW306B 2 15 Learjet 24D CJ610-6 2 

Learjet 24, 31, 45, 55, 60 1800 70 Learjet 35/36 TFE 731-2-2B 2 

15 Dornier 328JET PW306B 2 15 Learjet 24D CJ610-6 2 

Learjet 35 90 100 Learjet 35/36 TFE 731-2-2B 2 Learjet 35/36 5466 100 Learjet 35/36 TFE 731-2-2B 2 Learjet 35/36 (TFE 731-2-2B) 287 100 Learjet 35/36 TFE 731-2-2B 2 Learjet 35A 46 100 Learjet 35/36 TFE 731-2-2B 2 Learjet 35B 198 100 Learjet 35/36 TFE 731-2-2B 2 Learjet 60 102 100 Dornier 328JET PW306B 2 Learjet Lear 35-60 100 75 Learjet 35/36 TFE 731-2-2B 2 

25 Dornier 328JET PW306B 2 

LifeStar 3224 100 **LifeStar (BK-117) PT6A-36 2 LUSCOMB 8A - 65 HP CONTINENTAL 64 100 Cessna 150 O-200 1 Maule 391 80 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 

10 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 10 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-320-D1AD 1 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 34 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

Maule Jets 70 100 Air Tractor AT602 PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG 1 

Maule M-4-220C 91 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 Maule M7 Turbine (Jet A) 30 100 Air Tractor AT602 PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG 1 MD-80 4834 15 MD-80 JT8D-209 2 

15 MD-80 JT8D-219 2 14 MD-80 JT8D-217C 2 14 MD-80 JT8D-219 old comb 2 14 MD-80 JT8D-217 (old comb) 2 14 MD-80 JT8D-217 2 14 MD-80 JT8D-217A 2 

Military Helicopters 150 36 H-60 Black Hawk T700-GE-700 2 

13 H-3 SEA KING T58-GE-8F 2 13 SH-3E Sea King T58-GE-5 2 12 H-53J Pave Low T64-GE-100 2 

7 AH-1J Cobra T400-CP-400 2 7 AH-1S Cobra T53-L-11D 2 6 UH-1N Iroquois T400-CP-400 1 3 H-2 SEASPRITE T58-GE-8F 2 3 H-2 Super Seasprite T700-GE-401 -401C 2 

Misc 250 20 Cessna 150 O-200 1 

20 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-320-D1AD 1 20 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 20 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 20 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 

MOONEY ERCO AIRCOUPE (1P) 70 100 Cessna 150 O-200 1 Mooney Exec. 91 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 MOONEY M10 CADET (1P) 140 100 Cessna 150 O-200 1 Mooney M-20 3362 60 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 35 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

20 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 20 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 

MOONEY M20P ALLEGRO/EAGLE/RANGER (1P)

140 50 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 

50 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 

Mooney M20R 91 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 MOONEY M20T ENCORE/BRAVO (1P) 140 50 Cessna 172 Skyhawk TSIO-360C 1 

50 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 

Mooney w Textron Engine 2400 34 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 

33 Cessna 172 Skyhawk TSIO-360C 1 33 Comanche TIO-540-J2B2 1 

MU-300 (JT15D-4 (B,C,D)) 94 100 MU-300 JT15D-4 (B,C,D) 2 Multi Engine Piston 938 20 Aztec TIO-540-J2B2 2 

20 Cessna T337 IO-360-B 2 20 Navajo TIO-540-J2B2 2 20 Twin Comanche IO-320-D1AD 2 

8 FT337P TSIO-360C 2 6 337H Skymaster TSIO-360C 2 6 P-337P Skymaster TSIO-360C 2 

Multi Engine Turbine 330 10 ATR42 PW120 2 

10 ATR42-500 PW127E 2 10 Beech King Air 200 PT6A-41 2 10 Beech King Air 300 PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG 2 10 Beech King Air 350 PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG 2 10 DHC-8-300 PW123 2 

8 Dash 7 PT6A-50 4 5 BH-1900 PT6A-67D 2 5 Cessna 441 Conquest2 TPE331-8 2 5 Fokker 50 PW125-B 2 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 36 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

5 PA-31T Cheyenne PT6A-28 2 5 PA-42 Cheyenne PT6A-41 2 5 Shorts 330 PT6A-45R 2 2 Vickers 953 Vanguard TYNE 4 

N2S3 Stearman 220 Hp 500 76 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 

24 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 

Navajo (Twin Engine TIO-540-J2B2) 2081 100 Navajo TIO-540-J2B2 2 NAVY N-3-N - 220 HP WRIGHT 64 76 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 

24 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 

O-320 Eng Eq. 832 100 Piper PA-28 O-320 1 Other M&M (SEL-Piston) 1725 26 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 

22 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 20 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-320-D1AD 1 20 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 10 Cessna 150 O-200 1 

2 Cessna 172 Skyhawk TSIO-360C 1 

Other Small BDR Aircraft (assume O-320) 862 15 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 

15 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 10 337H Skymaster TSIO-360C 2 10 ATR42-500 PW127E 2 10 Aztec TIO-540-J2B2 2 10 Beech King Air 300 PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG 2 10 Cessna 208 Caravan PT6A-114 1 10 Cessna T337 IO-360-B 2 10 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 

P-337P Skymaster (Twin Engine TSIO-360C) 86 100 P-337P Skymaster TSIO-360C 2 Piaggio 300 66 BH-1900 PT6A-67D 2 

34 Aztec TIO-540-J2B2 2 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 37 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

Pilatus Jets 140 100 Air Tractor AT602 PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG 1 

Pilatus PC-12 300 100 Air Tractor AT602 PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG 1 Pilatus PC-12/45 727 100 Air Tractor AT602 PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG 1 Piper 91 50 Piper PA-28 IO-320-D1AD 1 

50 Piper PA-28 O-320 1 

Piper 140 1000 100 Piper PA-28 O-320 1 PIPER AEST AEROSTAR (2P) 70 100 Aztec TIO-540-J2B2 2 Piper Arrow 5091 90 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 

5 Piper PA-28 O-320 1 5 Piper PA-28 IO-320-D1AD 1 

Piper Aztec 2273 100 Aztec TIO-540-J2B2 2 Piper Cherokee 7592 34 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 

33 Piper PA-28 IO-320-D1AD 1 33 Piper PA-28 O-320 1 

Piper Cheyenne 440 50 PA-31T Cheyenne PT6A-28 2 

50 PA-42 Cheyenne PT6A-41 2 

Piper Chieftain 91 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 Piper Cub 708 100 Cessna 150 O-200 1 Piper Dakota 91 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 Piper J3C-65 60 100 Cessna 150 O-200 1 Piper Mojave 300 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 Piper Navajo 500 100 Navajo TIO-540-J2B2 2 PIPER P28A ARCHER / CADET / CHEROKEE / WARRIOR (1P)

2242 50 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 

50 Piper PA-28 O-320 1 

PIPER P28B CHEROKEE / CHARGER / PATHFINDER / DAKOTA (1P)

2249 50 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 

24 Piper PA-28 IO-320-D1AD 1 24 Piper PA-28 O-320 1 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 38 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

2 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 

PIPER P28R ARROW (1P) 561 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 PIPER P28T TURBO ARROW (1P) 280 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk TSIO-360C 1 PIPER P46T MALIBU / MERIDIAN (1T) 140 100 400A Hustler PT6A-41 1 Piper PA 28-140 91 50 Piper PA-28 IO-320-D1AD 1 

50 Piper PA-28 O-320 1 

Piper PA 28-161 91 100 Piper PA-28 O-320 1 PIPER PA16 CLIPPER (1P) 70 58 Cessna 150 O-200 1 

42 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 

Piper PA18 6 100 Piper PA-28 O-320 1 PIPER PA-18 - 150 HP LYCOMING 64 100 Piper PA-28 O-320 1 Piper PA-18 Supercub 342 57 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 

43 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 

Piper PA-18-150 900 100 Piper PA-28 O-320 1 PIPER PA20 PACER (1P) 70 60 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 

40 Cessna 150 O-200 1 

PIPER PA22 TRI-PACER/CARRIBBEAN/COLT (1P)

70 100 Piper PA-28 O-320 1 

PIPER PA23 APACHE (2P) 70 100 Aztec TIO-540-J2B2 2 Piper PA-25 Pawnee 320 100 Comanche TIO-540-J2B2 1 Piper PA-28 301 50 Piper PA-28 IO-320-D1AD 1 

50 Piper PA-28 O-320 1 

Piper PA-28 (IO-320-D1AD) 3063 100 Piper PA-28 IO-320-D1AD 1 Piper PA-28 (O-320) 3063 100 Piper PA-28 O-320 1 Piper PA-28 Warrior 91 50 Piper PA-28 IO-320-D1AD 1 

50 Piper PA-28 O-320 1 

Piper PA-28-151 91 100 Piper PA-28 O-320 1 Piper PA-28R200 91 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 39 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

PIPER PA31 NAVAJO / CHEIFTAN / MOHAVE (2P)

140 100 Navajo TIO-540-J2B2 2 

Piper PA-31-350 930 100 Navajo TIO-540-J2B2 2 Piper PA-31T Cheyenne 300 100 PA-31T Cheyenne PT6A-28 2 Piper PA-32R 180 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 PIPER PA38 TOMAHAWK (1P) 140 80 Cessna 150 O-200 1 

20 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 

Piper PA-42 Cheyenne 300 100 PA-42 Cheyenne PT6A-41 2 PIPER PA44 SEMINOLE (2P) 140 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 PIPER PA46 MALIBU 140 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 Piper Seneca 2340 100 Cessna T337 IO-360-B 2 Piper Warrior 14000 50 Piper PA-28 IO-320-D1AD 1 

50 Piper PA-28 O-320 1 

Piper’s Cherokee-Arrow-Clipper 1000 30 Cessna 150 O-200 1 

30 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 20 Piper PA-28 IO-320-D1AD 1 20 Piper PA-28 O-320 1 

Pit Special Jets 70 25 Cessna 150 O-200 1 

25 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 25 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 25 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 

Powered Para Gliders 3000 100 Cessna 150 O-200 1 Raytheon Hawker 800 100 Hawker Horizon PW308A 2 Raytheon Hawker 125-800A/XP-1000A 250 100 Hawker Horizon PW308A 2 Robinson R-22 Helicopter 37115 34 Robinson R22 IO-360-B 1 

33 Robinson R22 O-320 1 33 Robinson R22 IO-320-D1AD 1 

Robinson R-22-R44 Helicopter 150 50 **Robinson R-44 TIO-540-J2B2 1 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 40 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

50 Robinson R22 IO-320-D1AD 1 

Robinson R-44 Helicopter 167 100 **Robinson R-44 TIO-540-J2B2 1 Rockwell Commander (O-320) 2256 100 Rockwell Commander O-320 1 RV4-6 250 50 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 

50 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 

SAAB 340 1527 100 SF-340-A CT7-5 2 Saberliner 75A 1070 100 Saberliner 75A CF700-2D 2 Schweizer Aircraft Corp Rotor Craft 12 34 Robinson R22 IO-360-B 1 

33 Bell 206 250B17B 1 33 Robinson R22 O-320 1 

Searay Experimental 250 100 Cessna 150 O-200 1 SH-33 Helicopter 70 100 H-53D Sea Stallion T64-GE-415 2 Sikorsky S-61 Helicopter 1000 50 H-3 SEA KING T58-GE-8F 2 

50 SH-3E Sea King T58-GE-5 2 

Sikorsky S-76 Helicopter 7160 100 **Sikorsky S76 PT6A-36 2 Sikorsky S-92 Helicopter 721 100 H-53D Sea Stallion T64-GE-415 2 Silvaire Luscombe 8F 91 100 Cessna 150 O-200 1 Single Engine 9194 40 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 

20 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 20 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-320-D1AD 1 10 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 

5 Cessna 208 Caravan PT6A-114 1 5 Equator P-550 Turbo PT6A-27 1 

Single Engine Beechcraft Bonanza/Sierra/Musketeer

500 30 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-320-D1AD 1 

30 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 30 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 10 Cessna 172 Skyhawk TSIO-360C 1 

Single Engine Cessna 152/172/182 600 20 Cessna 150 O-200 1 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 41 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

20 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 20 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-320-D1AD 1 20 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 20 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 

Single Engine Helicopters 500 30 Bell 206 250B17B 1 

15 Robinson R22 IO-320-D1AD 1 15 Robinson R22 IO-360-B 1 15 Robinson R22 O-320 1 15 Robinson R22 TSIO-360C 1 10 **Robinson R-44 TIO-540-J2B2 1 

Single Engine Piper Cherokee Series 475 34 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 

33 Piper PA-28 IO-320-D1AD 1 33 Piper PA-28 O-320 1 

Single Engine Piston 292 28 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 

25 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 20 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 20 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-320-D1AD 1 

5 Cessna 150 O-200 1 2 Cessna 172 Skyhawk TSIO-360C 1 

Small Twin Engine Aircraft 100 60 Aztec TIO-540-J2B2 2 

38 Cessna T337 IO-360-B 2 

2 337H Skymaster TSIO-360C 2 

SN601 Corvette (JT15D-4 (B,C,D)) 26 100 SN601 Corvette JT15D-4 (B,C,D) 2 Socata TBM 700 2353 100 Air Tractor AT602 PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG 1 Socata Tobago (IO-360-B) 2256 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 SPARTAN 7W - 450 HP PRATT&WHITNEY 64 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 Stinson Voyager 12 70 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 

30 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 42 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

Taylor Craft 275 100 Cessna 150 O-200 1 

Turbine powered helicopters mostly Black Hawks 125 100 H-60 Black Hawk T700-GE-700 2 Turboprops like Beech King Air 100 10 ATR42 PW120 2 

10 Beech King Air 100 PT6A-28 2 10 Beech King Air 200 PT6A-41 2 10 Beech King Air 300 PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG 2 10 Beech King Air 350 PT6A-60, -60A, -60AG 2 10 Beech King Air 90 PT6A-28 2 10 Beech King Air B200 PT6A-41 2 10 Cessna 208 Caravan PT6A-114 1 10 King Air 200 PT6A-41 2 10 King Air B200 PT6A-41 2 

Twin Comanche 1013 100 Twin Comanche IO-320-D1AD 2 Twin engine aircraft Beech Baron and Piper Aztec 150 100 Aztec TIO-540-J2B2 2 Twin Engine Piper Aztec / Seneca / Navajo 375 34 Navajo TIO-540-J2B2 2 

33 Aztec TIO-540-J2B2 2 33 Cessna T337 IO-360-B 2 

UH-1 Helicopter 150 100 UH-1N Iroquois T400-CP-400 1 UH-1H Helicopter 6 100 **UH-1H Helicopter T53-L-13 1 Ultralights 3245 100 Cessna 150 O-200 1 Unassigned Itinerant AC/AT Flights BDL 1050 30 B757-200 PW2037 2 

30 Learjet 35/36 TFE 731-2-2B 2 14 Embraer ERJ 145 AE3007A 2 13 Embraer ERJ 145 AE3007A1E 2 13 Embraer ERJ 145LR AE3007A1/3 (Type 1) 2 

Various Experimental Jets GON 280 100 A-10A Thunderbolt II TF34-GE-100-100A 2 Various other single engine aircraft N41 Waterbury 2000 20 Cessna 150 O-200 1 

20 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-320-D1AD 1 
 TABLE 3.4-2B 

2005 Aircraft Survey Results Linked to EDMS 4.5 Aircraft Model and Eng

(Sorted by Aircraft Model per Survey, Percent Applied, EDMS Aircraft and EDMS Engine

F - 43 

Aircraft Make Model Summary 

Annual 

LTOs 

Percent 

Applied EDMS Aircraft EDMS Engine 

No of 

Engine

20 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 20 Cessna 172 Skyhawk O-320 1 20 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 

WACO CTO - 350 HP WRIGHT 64 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 WACO YKC-S - 300 HP JACOBS 64 100 Cherokee six TIO-540-J2B2 1 West Wind 70 34 IAI Westwind TFE731-3 2 

33 Westwind 1 TFE731-3 2 33 Westwind 2 TFE731-3 2 

Whelan RV-8 SP 300 100 Cessna 172 Skyhawk IO-360-B 1 
TABLE 3.4-3

SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILY EMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT 

(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity) 

F - 44 

County / Airport Name Annual LTO 

SUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY) 

WINTER 

DAILY CO 

EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY)

ANNUAL EMI

VOC 

(LBS/DAY)

CO 

(LBS/DAY)

NOx 

(LBS/DAY)

VOC 

(TONS/YR)

(T

Fairfield CountyBridgeport Hospital Heliport 32 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 

Canal Street Heliport 34 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 Capt. Cove Sea/Heliport 5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Danbury Hospital Heliport 31 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Danbury Municipal Airport 36,596 135.4 3,043.8 12.2 2,078.4 21.8 Flying Ridge Airstrip 12 0.0 1.6 0.0 1.6 0.0 General Electric Co. Heliport 522 0.1 0.8 1.2 0.8 0.0 Greenwich Hospital 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Igor I. Sikorsky Memorial 33,712 176.8 2,802.3 127.4 1,906.1 32.0 

Norwalk Hospital Heliport 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Sikorsky Bridgeport Heliport 10 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 Sikorsky Helipad 2,893 34.1 53.9 29.6 43.8 5.4 St Vincent's Medical Center 12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Stamford Hospital 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 USSC Heliport 1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Fairfield County Total 73,883 346.5 5,902.9 171.0 4,031.0 59.2 Hartford CountyAvon LifeStar Emergency Site

9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Bancroft Airport 50 0.3 14.7 0.0 14.7 0.0 Berlin LifeStar Emergency Site

1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 
TABLE 3.4-3

SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILY EMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT 

(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity) 

F - 45 

County / Airport Name Annual LTO 

SUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY) 

WINTER 

DAILY CO 

EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY)

ANNUAL EMI

VOC 

(LBS/DAY)

CO 

(LBS/DAY)

NOx 

(LBS/DAY)

VOC 

(TONS/YR)

(T

Blanchette Heliport 16 0.1 6.9 0.0 2.3 0.0 

Bradley International Airport 78,985 555.1 4,674.7 3,494.9 4,233.3 97.8 

Bristol Hospital Heliport 12 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 

Bristol LifeStar Emergency Site

7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Burlington LifeStar Emergency 

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Canton LifeStar Emergency Site

3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Clark Hill Heliport 45 0.1 6.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 East Granby LifeStar Emergency 

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

East Windsor LifeStar 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Enfield LifeStar Emergency Site

1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Farmington LifeStar Emergency 

8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Glastonbury LifeStar Emergency 

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Granby LifeStar Emergency Site

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Green Acres Airstrip 156 0.1 0.7 0.3 0.7 0.0 

Hartford Hospital Helipad 1,646 0.2 3.7 5.4 2.8 0.0 Hartford LifeStar Emergency Site

1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Hartford-Brainard Airport 45,500 250.0 5,001.3 68.6 1,594.4 28.0 
TABLE 3.4-3

SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILY EMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT 

(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity) 

F - 46 

County / Airport Name Annual LTO 

SUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY) 

WINTER 

DAILY CO 

EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY)

ANNUAL EMI

VOC 

(LBS/DAY)

CO 

(LBS/DAY)

NOx 

(LBS/DAY)

VOC 

(TONS/YR)

(T

Hartland LifeStar Emergency Site

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Kaman Heliport 392 4.1 5.7 1.3 3.6 0.9 

Laurie Field 20 0.1 3.8 0.0 1.3 0.0 Manchester LifeStar Emergency 

1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Marlborough LifeStar Emergency

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Middlesex Marlborough Clinic

16 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 

Mountain Meadows Airport 18 0.0 2.9 0.0 1.4 0.0 

N B G H Heliport 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Newington LifeStar Emergency 

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Otis Elevator Co. Heliport 232 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.0 

Plainville LifeStar Emergency 

1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Rentschler Heliport 112 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.0 

Roberts Farm Airport 50 0.1 4.3 0.0 2.9 0.0 Robertson Field 29,550 86.7 2,487.1 13.7 1,338.5 14.0 Salmon River Airfield 555 3.2 151.4 0.1 103.3 0.2 Simsbury LifeStar Emergency 

3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Simsbury Tri-Town Airport 5,795 10.0 471.3 0.8 212.4 1.3 

Skylark's Air Park 15,150 46.9 2,207.1 2.9 441.4 4.3 South Meadows Heliport 50 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.8 0.0 
TABLE 3.4-3

SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILY EMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT 

(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity) 

F - 47 

County / Airport Name Annual LTO 

SUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY) 

WINTER 

DAILY CO 

EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY)

ANNUAL EMI

VOC 

(LBS/DAY)

CO 

(LBS/DAY)

NOx 

(LBS/DAY)

VOC 

(TONS/YR)

(T

South Windsor LifeStar 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Southington LifeStar Emergency 

1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

St. Francis Hospital Heliport 86 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 Stones Ranch 20 0.5 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.0 Suffield LifeStar Emergency Site

3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

UCONN Med Hurlbrink Heliport

19 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Ultimate Heliport 2 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.0 

Veterans Home & Hospital 4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 West Hartford LifeStar 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Hartford County Total 178,551 957.8 15,046.3 3,590.2 7,956.2 146.6 Litchfield CountyBarkhamsted LifeStar Emergency

7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Candlelight Farms Airport 1,035 3.6 167.0 0.4 16.6 0.2 Candlelight Farms Heliport 40 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.0 Charlotte Hungerford 77 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.0 Docktors Field 1 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Good Hill Farm 70 0.3 13.2 0.0 6.5 0.0 Goshen LifeStar Emergency Site

1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Harwinton LifeStar 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 
TABLE 3.4-3

SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILY EMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT 

(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity) 

F - 48 

County / Airport Name Annual LTO 

SUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY) 

WINTER 

DAILY CO 

EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY)

ANNUAL EMI

VOC 

(LBS/DAY)

CO 

(LBS/DAY)

NOx 

(LBS/DAY)

VOC 

(TONS/YR)

(T

Emergency Kent LifeStar Emergency Site

3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Litchfield LifeStar Emergency 

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Long View Landing Airport 204 0.4 15.2 0.1 14.9 0.1 

New Hartford LifeStar 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 New Milford Hospital 44 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 New Milford LifeStar Emergency

6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

North Canaan Airport 1,800 4.5 219.1 0.3 3.2 0.4 

North Canaan LifeStar 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Plymouth LifeStar Emergency 

1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Roxbury LifeStar Emergency Site

1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Salisbury LifeStar Emergency Site

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Seavair's Landing Airport 150 0.3 14.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 

Sharon Hospital Heliport 28 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 Sharon LifeStar Emergency Site

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Shingle Mill Heliport 20 0.0 0.9 0.0 2.1 0.0 

Thomaston LifeStar Emergency 

3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Torrington LifeStar 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 
TABLE 3.4-3

SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILY EMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT 

(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity) 

F - 49 

County / Airport Name Annual LTO 

SUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY) 

WINTER 

DAILY CO 

EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY)

ANNUAL EMI

VOC 

(LBS/DAY)

CO 

(LBS/DAY)

NOx 

(LBS/DAY)

VOC 

(TONS/YR)

(T

Emergency Warren LifeStar Emergency Site

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Washington LifeStar Emergency 

4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Waterbury-Plymouth Airport 2,980 6.8 323.3 0.6 51.9 0.7 

Whelan Farms Airport 900 1.5 67.9 0.1 14.4 0.2 Winchester LifeStar Emergency 

3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Wings Ago Airstrip 3 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Winsted Medical Center 9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Litchfield County Total 7,412 17.4 823.0 2.5 113.4 1.6 Middlesex CountyAetna @ Middletown Heliport

10 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 

Bemer Heliport 12 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Chester Airport 2,410 9.5 250.8 1.0 97.1 1.3 Chester LifeStar Emergency Site

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Clinton LifeStar Emergency Site

3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Cromwell LifeStar Emergency 

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Deep River LifeStar 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 
TABLE 3.4-3

SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILY EMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT 

(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity) 

F - 50 

County / Airport Name Annual LTO 

SUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY) 

WINTER 

DAILY CO 

EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY)

ANNUAL EMI

VOC 

(LBS/DAY)

CO 

(LBS/DAY)

NOx 

(LBS/DAY)

VOC 

(TONS/YR)

(T

Emergency Devil's Hopyard Field 250 1.5 66.6 0.0 31.6 0.1 

Durham LifeStar Emergency Site

8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

East Haddam LifeStar Emergency

4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

East Hampton LifeStar 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Essex LifeStar Emergency Site

1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Fetske Water Strip 3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Goodspeed Airport & Seaplane 

1,500 2.0 98.1 0.2 24.5 0.2 

Haddam LifeStar Emergency Site

7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Killingworth LifeStar Emergency

1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Maplewood Farm Airport 60 0.1 3.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 

Middlefield LifeStar Emergency 

1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Middlesex Hospital 30 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 

Middlesex Medical Center 37 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 Middletown LifeStar Emergency 

14 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Old Saybrook LifeStar 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Portland LifeStar Emergency Site

5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 
TABLE 3.4-3

SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILY EMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT 

(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity) 

F - 51 

County / Airport Name Annual LTO 

SUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY) 

WINTER 

DAILY CO 

EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY)

ANNUAL EMI

VOC 

(LBS/DAY)

CO 

(LBS/DAY)

NOx 

(LBS/DAY)

VOC 

(TONS/YR)

(T

Westbrook LifeStar Emergency 

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Middlesex County Total 4,378 13.1 419.4 1.8 154.5 1.6 New Haven CountyBristol-Myers Squibb Co. 309 0.1 0.9 1.4 0.5 0.0 

Griswold Airport 9,914 14.9 596.1 1.5 155.2 1.7 Hummingbird Heliport 1,000 0.4 3.2 1.9 1.0 0.1 Meriden - Wallingford Hospital 

22 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 

Meriden LifeStar Emergency Site

5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Meriden-Markham Municpal 10,024 13.8 524.6 4.5 363.2 2.4 

Middlebury LifeStar Emergency 

1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Milford Hospital 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Oxford LifeStar Emergency Site

1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Southbury LifeStar Emergency 

1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

St. Mary's Hospital Heliport 19 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 

St. Raphael Heliport 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tweed-New Haven Airport 34,157 103.9 2,312.8 69.8 1,590.1 15.4 

U.S. Surgical Rooftop Heliport

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 
TABLE 3.4-3

SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILY EMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT 

(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity) 

F - 52 

County / Airport Name Annual LTO 

SUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY) 

WINTER 

DAILY CO 

EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY)

ANNUAL EMI

VOC 

(LBS/DAY)

CO 

(LBS/DAY)

NOx 

(LBS/DAY)

VOC 

(TONS/YR)

(T

Wallingford LifeStar Emergency 

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Waterbury Hospital Center 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Waterbury-Oxford Airport 27,823 138.5 1,802.5 301.7 1,188.6 23.2 

Yale New Haven Shoreline 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Yale-New Haven Hospital 248 0.0 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.0 

New Haven County Total 83,552 271.5 5,240.8 381.9 3,299.2 42.8 New London CountyBackus Hospital Heliport 503 0.1 1.1 1.5 0.8 0.0 

Camp Rell 30 0.7 1.1 0.4 1.1 0.1 Colchester Heliport 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Colchester LifeStar Emergency 

6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

East Lyme LifeStar Emergency 

3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Gallup Farm Airport 21 0.1 3.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 Global Development Facility 276 0.0 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.0 Griswold LifeStar Emergency Site

1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Groton LifeStar Emergency Site

7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Groton-New London Airport 28,942 240.1 2,505.9 103.8 1,565.3 35.3 

Lawrence & Memorial Hospital

47 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 
TABLE 3.4-3

SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILY EMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT 

(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity) 

F - 53 

County / Airport Name Annual LTO 

SUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY) 

WINTER 

DAILY CO 

EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY)

ANNUAL EMI

VOC 

(LBS/DAY)

CO 

(LBS/DAY)

NOx 

(LBS/DAY)

VOC 

(TONS/YR)

(T

Lebanon LifeStar Emergency Site

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Ledyard LifeStar Emergency Site

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Lyme LifeStar Emergency Site

1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Mile Creek Airport 60 0.4 17.6 0.0 11.6 0.0 

MPTN Heliport 50 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 New London LifeStar Emergency

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Old Lyme LifeStar Emergency 

4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Salem LifeStar Emergency Site

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Ski's Landing Area 6 0.0 1.8 0.0 1.8 0.0 

Spruce Airport 35 0.1 3.7 0.0 0.8 0.0 Stonington LifeStar Emergency 

3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Waterford LifeStar Emergency 

4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

New London County Total 30,009 241.5 2,535.2 106.6 1,582.2 35.4 Tolland CountyAndover LifeStar Emergency Site

1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 
TABLE 3.4-3

SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILY EMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT 

(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity) 

F - 54 

County / Airport Name Annual LTO 

SUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY) 

WINTER 

DAILY CO 

EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY)

ANNUAL EMI

VOC 

(LBS/DAY)

CO 

(LBS/DAY)

NOx 

(LBS/DAY)

VOC 

(TONS/YR)

(T

Bolton LifeStar Emergency Site

3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Columbia LifeStar Emergency 

3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Coventry LifeStar Emergency 

4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Ellington Airport 38,225 27.3 1,792.8 6.9 1,209.9 4.0 

Ellington LifeStar Emergency 

9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Hebron LifeStar Emergency Site

4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Heckler Field 124 0.1 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Johnson Memorial Hospital 26 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 Mansfield LifeStar Emergency 

8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Rockville General Hospital 16 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Somers LifeStar Emergency Site

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Stafford LifeStar Emergency Site

9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Tolland LifeStar Emergency Site

11 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Valley Farms Airport 30 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Vernon LifeStar Emergency Site

5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Willington LifeStar 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 
TABLE 3.4-3

SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILY EMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT 

(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity) 

F - 55 

County / Airport Name Annual LTO 

SUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY) 

WINTER 

DAILY CO 

EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY)

ANNUAL EMI

VOC 

(LBS/DAY)

CO 

(LBS/DAY)

NOx 

(LBS/DAY)

VOC 

(TONS/YR)

(T

Emergency Windward Heights Airstrip 5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Wysocki Airport 11 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 

Tolland County Total 38,500 27.5 1,800.7 7.1 1,211.3 4.0 Windham CountyAshford LifeStar Emergency Site

3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Brooklyn LifeStar Emergency 

4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

BUELL FARM 120 0.2 8.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Canterbury LifeStar Emergency 

1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Chaplin LifeStar Emergency Site

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Danielson Airport 12,170 29.6 1,421.0 4.0 91.0 2.1 

Day Kimball Hospital 47 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 Eastford LifeStar Emergency Site

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Hampton LifeStar Emergency 

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Killingly LifeStar Emergency Site

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Plainfield LifeStar Emergency 

3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 
TABLE 3.4-3

SUMMARY OF 2005 ANNUAL AND DAILY EMISSIONS FROM AIRCRAFT 

(Sorted by County and Airport Name for airports having greater than zero activity) 

F - 56 

County / Airport Name Annual LTO 

SUMMER DAILY EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY) 

WINTER 

DAILY CO 

EMISSIONS 

(LBS/DAY)

ANNUAL EMI

VOC 

(LBS/DAY)

CO 

(LBS/DAY)

NOx 

(LBS/DAY)

VOC 

(TONS/YR)

(T

Putnam LifeStar Emergency Site

3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Scotland LifeStar Emergency Site

2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Thompson LifeStar Emergency 

4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Toutant Airport 5 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Westford Airstrip 3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Windham Airport 9,025 13.8 449.4 3.0 133.8 1.8 Windham Community Memorial 

62 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 

Windham LifeStar Emergency 

5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Woodstock Airport 750 1.6 72.4 0.1 36.2 0.2 

Woodstock LifeStar Emergency 

1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Windham County Total 22,216 45.3 1,952.8 7.7 261.1 4.1 State Total 438,501 1,920.6 33,721.1 4,268.7 18,609.0 295.3 
F - 57 

3.6 LOCOMOTIVES

Locomotive emissions were determined following guidance contained in the Procedures 

Document. Table 3.6-7 presents an estimate for the VOC, NOx, and CO produced by 

locomotives activities for a typical ozone season day and annually. Table 3.6-7 also 

presents an estimate for the CO produced by locomotives activities for a winter day. 

Thirteen companies operated locomotives in 2005: 

• Amtrak 

• Branford Steam Railroad 

• Central New England Railroad 

• Connecticut Southern Railroad 

• CSX Transportation, Inc. 

• Housatonic Railroad Company 

• Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company 

• Naugatuck Railroad Company 

• New England Central Railroad, Inc. 

• Providence and Worcester Railroad Company 

• Shoreline East Railway 

• Springfield Terminal Railway Company (now called Pan Am Railway) 

• Valley Railroad Company 

CSX Transportation, Inc. is the only Class I company providing freight service within 

Connecticut. 

Branford Steam Railroad, Central New England Railroad, Connecticut Southern 

Railroad, Housatonic Railroad Company, New England Central Railroad, Inc., 

Providence and Worcester Railroad Company, and Springfield Terminal Railway (aka 

Pan Am Railway) Company are Class II and III companies that provide freight service 

within Connecticut. Naugatuck Railroad Company and Valley Railroad Company are 

tourist attractions that were classified with the same designations as these Class II and III 

companies. These two tourist attractions only account for 0.4% of the locomotive diesel 

fuel usage and are not a significant influence in emissions or in the seasonal distribution 

of emissions. 

Amtrak, Shoreline East Railway and the Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company 

provide commuter and passenger service for Connecticut. Amtrak Line Haul 

Locomotives are classified under SCC 22-85-002-008 “Line Haul Locomotives 

Passenger (Diesel)”, while Shoreline East Railway and the Metro-North Commuter 

Railroad Company are classified under 22-85-002-009 “Line Haul Locomotives 

Commuter Lines (Diesel)”. While Shoreline East Railway is a subsidiary of Amtrak, the 

Shoreline East Railway functions primarily as a commuter line. 

Table 3.6-1 provides a tabulation of track mileage usage by diesel line haul locomotives. 

The track mileage assignments previously used in apportioning the locomotive emissions 

in 1999 and 2002 Ozone and Carbon Monoxide Periodic Emissions Inventories were 
F - 58 

used with one exception. Hartford County track mileage for CSX Transportation, Inc 

was changed from 33.75 to 0 miles. Amtrak’s Track 10 listed on Reference 15 was 

interpreted as showing track rights for both Connecticut Southern Railroad and CSX 

Transportation, Inc; consequently CSX Transportation, Inc had track miles in Hartford 

County. Reference 16 indicated that CSX Transportation, Inc did not have track rights in 

Hartford County. CSX Transportation, Inc confirmed that track mileage should only be 

applied to Fairfield and New Haven Counties. 

Each company that operates locomotives in Connecticut provided an estimate for the 

amount of fuel consumed in 2005 in the state. Amtrak, Branford Steam Railroad, 

Connecticut Southern Railroad, CSX Railroad, Metro-North Railroad, Springfield 

Terminal Railway (aka Pan Am Railway) Company and Valley Railroad were the only 

railroad companies that reported switchyard activity. Naugatuck Railroad Company data 

was not available at the time of this draft, so 2002 activity data was used calculate 

emissions. Total locomotive diesel fuel usage for 2005 was estimated at 4,878,977 

gallons based on Connecticut DEP survey results. The Energy Information 

Administration (EIA) Fuel Oil and Kerosene Sales8 Table 23 estimates total railroad 

distillate fuel use for transportation and heating at 3,715,000 gallons. While these 

numbers are differ (i.e. energy information numbers are 24% lower than the survey data), 

locomotive fuel usage survey results are considered to provide a better estimate of 

locomotive diesel fuel usage, especially considering Connecticut’s size and the ability for 

out of state railroads to refuel outside of Connecticut (i.e. Providence and Worcester 

Railroad Company, CSX Transportation, Inc, and Springfield Terminal Railway 

Company). See Table 23 of Reference 8 for further information related to transportation 

related distillate diesel fuel sales. 

The Valley Railroad Company is the only locomotive company in Connecticut that 

reported using a coal fired locomotive. In 2005, Valley Railroad Company used 303 tons 

of Pocahontas brand anthracite coal, and 3,056 gallons of diesel fuel, all in Middlesex 

County. 

The amount of fuel consumed by line haul locomotives in each county annually was 

apportioned by track mileage by the following equation (see Tables 3.6-1 and 3.6-2): 

Where: 

 Q = amount of fuel consumed by line haul or switchyard locomotives 

by company in each county (gal) 

 QCT = amount of fuel consumed by line haul or switchyard locomotives 

by company in Connecticut (gal) 

 TMZ = miles of track used by each company in each county (miles) 

 TMCT = miles of track used by each company in Connecticut (miles) 

TMCT

TMZQCT =Q

×
F - 59 

A sample calculation for the quantity of diesel fuel consumed for line haul use by MetroNorth Railroad in New Haven County is: 

Q = 567,725 gallons of diesel fuel consumed in New Haven County 

The emission factors for both diesel-powered line haul locomotives and diesel-powered 

switchyard locomotives were taken from Table 3 of the Technical Highlights 

Document12. Since the Technical Highlights document presented an emission factor for 

total hydrocarbons (THC or HC), the value for the Diesel Engine Type was presented in 

that Table for Conversion Factors for Hydrocarbon Emission Results in EPA’s 

Conversion Factors for Hydrocarbon Emission Components13 was used to convert the 

emission factor to provide a VOC emission factor (i.e. 1.053 VOC/THC times the THC 

based emission factor yields a VOC emission factor). The emission factors for coal 

powered locomotives were obtained from Table 1.2-1 in Compilation of Air Pollution 

Emission Factors (AP-42)10. 

Locomotives were assumed to operate 5 days per week 52 weeks of the year, with 

uniform activity throughout the year (i.e. typical summer and winter daily emissions are 

identical). The seasonal adjustment factor for uniform activity is 0.25 for all four 

seasons. The equation used to calculate daily emissions for this category is as follows: 

Where: 

E = county daily emissions from locomotives (lbs./day) 

Q = amount of fuel consumed by locomotives by county 

EF = emission factor (lbs./gal) 

SF = seasonal adjustment factor (%/100) 

DAYS = activity days per week (5 days) 

13 = 52 weeks per year divided by 4 seasons is 13 weeks per season 

A sample calculation for the VOC emissions from Metro-North line haul locomotives in 

New Haven County is: 

E = 48.0 lb. VOC per day 

Calculated emissions are presented in Tables 3.6-4, 3.6-5, 3.6-6, 3.6-7 and 3.6-8. 

51.26

1,075,446 27.06 =Q×

13DAYS

SFEFQ =E

×

× ×

135

567,725 0.022 0.25 =E

×

× ×
Table 3.6-1 

2005 DIESEL LINE HAUL LOCOMOTIVES TRACK MILEAGE 

IN EACH COUNTY BY COMPANY 

F - 60 

Railroad 

Company 

Name 

Track Rights for Each Connecticut County Railroa

d Total 

for 

State 

Fairfiel

d 

Hartfor

d 

Litchfiel

d 

Middlese

x 

New 

Haven

New 

London

Tollan

d 

Windha

m 

Amtrak 0.00 33.90 0.00 11.60 38.90 33.90 0.00 0.00 118.30 

Branford 

Steam 

Railroad 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5.00 

Central 

New 

England 

Railroad 0 3.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.75 

Connectic

ut 

Southern 

Railroad 0 39 0 0 19 0 0 0 58.00 

CSX 

Railroad 39.38 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 69.38 

Housatoni

c Railroad 

Company 36 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 82.00 

MetroNorth 

Commuter 

Railroad 

Company 24.2 0 0 0 27.06 0 0 0 51.26 

Naugatuc

k Railroad 

Company 0 0 15.5 0 4.1 0 0 0 19.60 

New 

England 

Central 

Railroad, 

Inc 0 0 0 0 0 23 23.2 7 53.20 

Providenc

e and 

Worcester 

Railroad 

Company 72.4 0 0 17.1 58.2 73.5 0 46.2 267.40 

Shoreline 

East 

Railway 0 0 0 10 21.8 0 0 0 31.80 
Table 3.6-1 

2005 DIESEL LINE HAUL LOCOMOTIVES TRACK MILEAGE 

IN EACH COUNTY BY COMPANY 

F - 61 

Springfield 

Terminal 

Railway 

Company 0 18.4 24.1 0 28.5 0 0 0 71.00 

Valley 

Railroad 

Company 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 13.00 

All 

Railroads 

171.9

8 95.05 85.60 51.70 

232.5

6 130.40 23.20 53.20 843.69 
Table 3.6-2 

2005 GALLONS OF DIESEL FUEL USE FOR LINE HAUL 

LOCOMOTIVES BY COMPANY AND COUNTY APPORTIONED 

BASED ON TRACK RIGHT MILAGE IN EACH COUNTY

F - 62 

Railroad 

Company 

Fairfiel

d 

Hartfor

d 

Litchfiel

d 

Middlese

x 

New 

Haven 

New 

Londo

n 

Tollan

d 

Windha

m 

Railroad 

State 

Total 

Amtrak 

362,77

6 124,136 416,283

362,77

6 

1,265,97

1

Branford 

Steam 

Railroad 29,358 29,358

Central 

New 

England 

Railroad 28,214 28,214

Connectic

ut 

Southern 

Railroad 

174,47

8 85,002 259,480

CSX 

Railroad 

146,41

5 111,555 257,970

Housatoni

c Railroad 

Company 62,512 79,876 142,387

MetroNorth 

Commuter 

Railroad 

Company 

507,72

1 567,725

1,075,44

6

Naugatuc

k Railroad 

Company 11,307 2,991 14,298

New 

England 

Central 

Railroad, 

Inc 74,007 

74,65

0 22,524 171,181

Providenc

e and 

Worcester 

Railroad 

Company 

130,60

8 30,848 104,991

132,59

2 83,344 482,382

Shoreline 

East 

Railway 252,229 549,858 802,087
Table 3.6-2 

2005 GALLONS OF DIESEL FUEL USE FOR LINE HAUL 

LOCOMOTIVES BY COMPANY AND COUNTY APPORTIONED 

BASED ON TRACK RIGHT MILAGE IN EACH COUNTY

F - 63 

Springfiel

d Terminal 

Railway 

Company 3,537 4,633 5,479 13,650

Valley 

Railroad 

Company 2,636 2,636

Line Haul 

Total 

847,25

6 

569,00

5 95,816 409,848

1,873,2

42

569,37

5 

74,65

0 

105,86

7

4,545,06

0
F - 64 

Table 3.6-3 

2005 GALLONS OF DIESEL FUEL USED BE EACH COMPANY 

FOR SWITCHYARD LOCOMOTIVES IN EACH COUNTY 

County Fairfield Hartford Middlesex New Haven 

Railroad 

State Total 

Amtrak 0 0 0 75,679 75,679 

Branford Steam Railroad 0 0 0 16,148 16,148 

Connecticut Southern 

Railroad 0 93,027 0 0 93,027 

CSX Railroad 14,032 0 0 14,032 28,065 

Metro-North Commuter 

Railroad Company 97,179 0 0 0 97,179 

Springfield Terminal 

Railway Company 0 11,700 0 11,700 23,400 

Valley Railroad Company 0 0 420 0 420 

Total Switchyard 111,211 104,727 420 117,559 333,917 

TABLE 3.6-4

2005 SUMMARY OF DIESEL LINE HAUL LOCOMOTIVES EMISSIONS 

BY COUNTY

(OZONE SEASON DAY CO EMISSIONS ARE IDENTICAL TO CO WINTER DAY EMISSIONS) 

County 

CO 

(lbs/day)

VOC 

 (lbs/day)

NOx 

(lbs/day)

Fairfield 191.10 75.65 1,939.69 

Hartford 128.34 50.80 1,302.67 

Litchfield 21.61 8.56 219.36 

Middlesex 92.44 36.59 938.30 

New Haven 422.50 167.25 4,288.56 

New London 128.42 50.84 1,303.51 

Tolland 16.84 6.67 170.90 

Windham 23.88 9.45 242.37 

State Total 1,025.12 405.81 10,405.36 
F - 65 

TABLE 3.6-5

2005 SUMMARY OF DIESEL POWERED SWITCHYARD 

LOCOMOTIVE EMISSIONS BY COUNTY 

(OZONE SEASON DAY CO EMISSIONS ARE IDENTICAL TO CO WINTER DAY EMISSIONS) 

County 

CO 

(lbs/day)

VOC 

(lbs/day)

NOx 

(lbs/day)

Fairfield 35.93 20.85 341.36 

Hartford 33.83 19.64 321.45 

Middlesex 0.14 0.08 1.29 

New Haven 37.98 22.04 360.84 

STATE TOTAL 107.87 62.61 1,024.95 

TABLE 3.6-6 

2005 SUMMARY OF COAL POWERED LOCOMOTIVE EMISSIONS 

(OZONE SEASON DAY CO EMISSIONS ARE IDENTICAL TO CO WINTER DAY EMISSIONS) 

 CO VOC NOx 

County (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) 

Middlesex 104.89 20.98 3.50 

STATE TOTAL 104.89 20.98 3.50 

TABLE 3.6-7 

2005 SUMMARY OF ANNUAL AND DAILY EMISSIONS 

FROM LOCOMOTIVES 

(OZONE SEASON DAY CO EMISSIONS ARE IDENTICAL TO CO WINTER DAY EMISSIONS) 

County 

Daily CO 

(lbs/day) 

Daily VOC 

(lbs/day) 

Daily NOx 

(lbs/day) 

Annual CO 

(tons/year) 

Annual VOC 

(tons/year) 

Annual NOx 

(tons/year) 

Fairfield 227.02 96.50 2,281.05 29.51 12.54 296.54 

Hartford 162.17 70.44 1,624.12 21.08 9.16 211.14 

Litchfield 21.61 8.56 219.36 2.81 1.11 28.52 

Middlesex 197.46 57.65 943.08 25.67 7.49 122.60 

New Haven 460.48 189.30 4,649.40 59.86 24.61 604.42 

New London 128.42 50.84 1,303.51 16.69 6.61 169.46 

Tolland 16.84 6.67 170.90 2.19 0.87 22.22 

Windham 23.88 9.45 242.37 3.10 1.23 31.51 

TOTAL 1,237.88 489.40 11,433.80 160.92 63.62 1,486.39 
F - 66 

TABLE 3.6-8

2005 SUMMARY OF ANNUAL AND DAILY EMISSIONS

FROM LOCOMOTIVES BY USE AND COUNTY

(OZONE SEASON DAY CO EMISSIONS ARE IDENTICAL TO CO WINTER DAY EMISSIONS) 

Locomotive Use / 

 County 

Daily 

CO 

(lbs/day) 

Daily 

VOC 

(lbs/day)

Daily 

NOx 

(lbs/day) 

Annual 

CO 

(tons/year)

Annual 

VOC 

(tons/year) 

Annual 

NOx 

(tons/year) 

Commuter Rail 

 Fairfield 146 64 1,461 19 8.3 190 

 Hartford 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 

 Litchfield 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 

 Middlesex 57 23 577 7 2.9 75 

 New Haven 252 100 2,559 33 13.0 333 

 New London 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 

 Tolland 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 

 Windham 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 

Commuter Rail Total: 455 186 4,597 59 24.2 598 

 

Passenger Rail

 Fairfield 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 

 Hartford 82 32 831 11 4.2 108 

 Litchfield 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 

 Middlesex 28 11 284 4 1.4 37 

 New Haven 118 51 1,185 15 6.7 154 

 New London 82 32 831 11 4.2 108 

 Tolland 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 

 Windham 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 

Passenger Rail 

Total: 310 127 3,131 40 16.5 407

 

Entertainment Rail 

 Fairfield 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

 Hartford 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

 Litchfield (*) 3 (*) 1 (*) 26 0 0.1 3

 Middlesex (*) 106 (*) 21 (*) 11 14 2.8 1

 New Haven (*) 1 (*) 0 (*) 7 0 0.0 1

 New London 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

 Tolland 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

 Windham 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

Entertainment Rail 

Total: (*) 109 (*) 23 (*) 44 14 2.9 6
F - 67 

TABLE 3.6-8 (Continued)

2005 SUMMARY OF ANNUAL AND DAILY EMISSIONS

FROM LOCOMOTIVES BY USE AND COUNTY 

(OZONE SEASON DAY CO EMISSIONS ARE IDENTICAL TO CO WINTER DAY EMISSIONS) 

Locomotive Use / 

 County 

Daily 

CO 

(lbs/day) 

Daily 

VOC 

(lbs/day)

Daily 

NOx 

(lbs/day) 

Annual 

CO 

(tons/year)

Annual 

VOC 

(tons/year) 

Annual 

NOx 

(tons/year) 

Freight Class I 

 Fairfield 38 16 378 5 2.0 49

 Hartford 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

 Litchfield 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

 Middlesex 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

 New Haven 30 13 298 4 1.6 39

 New London 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

 Tolland 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

 Windham 0 0 0 0 0.0 0

Freight Class I 

Total: 67 28 677 9 3.7 88

 

Freight Class II / 

III

 Fairfield 44 17 442 6 2.2 57

 Hartford 80 38 794 10 4.9 103

 Litchfield 19 8 193 2 1.0 25

 Middlesex 7 3 71 1 0.4 9

 New Haven 60 25 600 8 3.3 78

 New London 47 18 473 6 2.4 61

 Tolland 17 7 171 2 0.9 22

 Windham 24 9 242 3 1.2 32

Freight Class II / 

III Total 297 125 2,986 39 16.3 388

STATE TOTAL 1,238 489 11,434 161 63.6 1,486

(*) Daily estimates for Entertainment contribution are based on the uniform activity assumption stated in 

the analytic method description. The activity of the Entertainment Rail does not conform to this 

assumption, but is a very small contributor to railroad emissions. Annual estimates for the Entertainment 

Rail contribution reflect activity and usage; however accurate daily estimates for Entertainment Rail 

contribution would require additional efforts that are not required to support a periodic emissions inventory. 

Daily summer and daily winter CO are essentially equal due to similar activity and emission factors for 

locomotives. 
F - 68 

3.7 REFERENCES FOR SECTION 3 

1. 1990 Base Year Ozone and CO Emissions Inventory SIP, The Bureau of Air Management, 

Department of Environmental Protection, State of Connecticut, Hartford, CT, November 1993 

2. User's Guide to MOBILE6.1 and MOBILE6.2 Mobile Source Emission Factor Model, 

Document EPA420-R-03-010, US EPA, OTAQ, January 2002 

3. Technical Guidance on the Use of MOBILE6.2 for Emission Inventory Preparation, Document 

EPA420-R-04-013, US EPA, OAR/OTAQ, August, 2004 

4. Procedures for Emission Inventory Preparation, Volume IV: MOBILE Sources, US EPA, 

OAQPS, 1992 

5. 1999 RFG Survey, Fuels & Energy Division, US EPA, April 1997 

6. Airport Activity Statistics of Certificated Route Air Carriers CY 1995, Federal Aviation 

Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC 

7. Part 1 Waterborne Commerce of the United States - 2005, Document Number IWR-WCUS-05-

1, U.S. Department of Army Corps of Engineers, Alexandria, Virginia. For sale by: District 

Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer District, New Orleans, P.O. Box 60267, New Orleans, Lousiana 

70160 available on the web at http://www.iwr.usace.army.mil/ndc/wcsc/pdf/wcusatl05.pdf 

8. Energy Information Administration http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/states/main_ct.html or 

http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/fuel_oil_and_kerosene_sales/foks_

historical.html (for multiple years) or for 2005 go to 

http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/fuel_oil_and_kerosene_sales/h

istorical/2005/foks_2005.html 

9. Procedures for Emission Inventory Preparation, Volume IV: MOBILE Sources, US EPA, 

OAQPS, July 1989 

10. Compilation of Air Pollution Emission Factors (AP-42), Fifth Edition, with supplements A, B, 

C, D, E, and F, US EPA, OAQPS, Research Triangle Park, NC, May 1998 

11. Fuels & Energy Division, US EPA: RFG Property and Performance Averages for Hartford, CT 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/fuels/rfg/properf/hart-ct.htm ; RFG Property and Performance 

Averages for CT – remainder http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/fuels/rfg/properf/ct-remain.htm ; 

and RFG Property and Performance Averages for NY-NJ-Long Is.-CT 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/fuels/rfg/properf/ny-nj-ct.htm (2005 Values presented on the page 

as of January 3, 2008) 

12. Technical Highlights Emission Factors for Locomotives, US EPA, OMS, December 1997, 

Document Number EPA420-F-97-051 

13. Conversion Factors for Hydrocarbon Emission Components, US EPA, OTAQ, May 2003, 

Document Number EPA420-P-03-002 

14. Diesel Fuel Sulfur Inputs for the Model used in the 2004 Nonroad diesel Engine Final Rule, 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/nonrdmdl/nonrdmdl2004/sulfur.txt 

15. 2007 Connecticut Rail Transportation Ownership and Service, Connecticut Dept. of 

Transportation Bureau of Public Transportation Office of Rail as of October 2006. 

16. Federal Railroad Administration Geographic Link off http://www.fra.dot.gov/us/content/23

website obtaining http://fragis.frasafety.net/GISFRASafety/default.aspx then zoomed to 

Connecticut 
ATTACHMENT F1 

Sample Airport Cover Letter and Survey Sheet

F - 69 

July 19, 2006 

«Contact», «Title» 

«AirportName» 

«ContactAddr1» 

«ContactAddr2» 

Dear «Contact», 

The Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Bureau of Air Management is 

conducting a survey of airports operating in the state to determine the impact of fine particulate 

(PM2.5), hydrocarbon, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen oxide emissions on the air quality in 

Connecticut. Aircraft operations are a small contributor to Connecticut ground level ozone 

concentrations but Federal guidelines maintain that states must include airport activity in our 

emission inventories. The DEP requests your cooperation in providing the following information: 

♦ Update airport contact information and provide seasonal and yearly Landing and 

Takeoff (LTO) cycles for the calendar year 2005 (An aircraft landing then taking off 

would be one LTO) for the various type(s) of aircraft (i.e., Beech 18, Cessna 150) 

using your runways. 

♦ Hospitals and emergency service providers are requested to breakout LTO counts into 

two groups, those going to another airport or hospital and those going to an accident 

scene. This will allow the DEP to account for the LTO at the accident scene while 

avoiding any double counting that would have resulted at the other airport or hospital. 

Unless otherwise identified in the survey response, all accident scene LTOs will be 

assumed to be within the same county as the hospital. 

♦ If aircraft specific LTO estimates are unavailable, a list of the predominant type(s) of 

aircraft using your runways with an estimation of percentages activity for each type of 

aircraft can be used with estimated LTO totals. 

The DEP is aware this data is usually not kept in detail, but rough estimates are acceptable here. 

The DEP would appreciate your response to the enclosed survey by September 14, 2006. Your 

response to this survey will help in preparing the 2005 PM2.5, Ozone and Carbon Monoxide 

Emissions Inventory. 

Your immediate response to this survey is very important. If you would like an alternative survey 

format (i.e. hardcopy via mail or fax or an electronic form) or if you have any questions, I can be 

contacted at (860) 424-3385 or by E-mail at Steven.Potter@po.state.ct.us. Thank you in advance 

for your time and cooperation. 

Sincerely, 

Steven Potter 

Air Pollution Control Engineer II, Mobile Source Inventory 
ATTACHMENT F1 

Sample Airport Cover Letter and Survey Sheet

F - 70 

Connecticut Airport Activity Survey 

CT Department of Environmental Protection

79 Elm Street, 5th Floor ♦ Hartford, CT 06106 ♦ 860-424-3385 ♦ 860-424-4063 (fax) 

Please complete or correct the following information and return by September 14, 2006 

Airport Name:

Location of Airport/Heliport:

Connecticut Aircraft specific data for 2005

Aircraft (Make & Model) 

Annual LTOs 

(12 month total) 

Jun., Jul., and 

Aug. LTOs 

Jan., Feb., and 

Dec. LTOs 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name (print): Title: 

Telephone: Email: 

This information can be E-mailed to me at Steven.Potter@po.state.ct.us or faxed to 860-424-4063. 

Optional Notes, Comments or Clarifications: 
Sample Locomotive Cover Letter and Survey Sheet

F - 71 

January 4, 2006 

«Contact_Person», «Title» 

«RailroadCo» 

«Address» 

«City», «State» «PostalCode» 

Dear «Contact_Person»: 

The Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Bureau of Air Management is 

conducting a survey of companies operating locomotives in the state to determine the impact of 

hydrocarbon emissions on the air quality in Connecticut. The DEP requests your cooperation in 

providing the following information: 

♦ Diesel fuel and/or coal use by Yard Locomotives in Connecticut in 2002. 

♦ Diesel fuel and/or coal use by Line Haul Locomotives in Connecticut in 2002. 

Or if Connecticut specific information is unavailable: 

♦ Gross ton-miles traffic density in Connecticut in 2002. 

♦ Gross ton-miles traffic density system wide in 2002. 

♦ Diesel fuel and/or coal use by Line Haul Locomotives system wide in 2002. 

Please also include the following track mileage information: 

♦ Miles of track used by diesel and/or coal Yard Locomotives. 

♦ Miles of track used by diesel and/or coal Line Haul Locomotives 

Please keep in mind this fuel-related question is for the entire year. The DEP would appreciate 

your response to the enclosed survey by March 31, 2006. Your response to this survey will help in 

preparing the 2002 Ozone and Carbon Monoxide Emissions Inventory. 

Your immediate response to this survey is very important. If you have any questions, I can be 

contacted at (860) 424-3385 or by E-mail at Steven.Potter@po.state.ct.us. Thank you in advance 

for your time and cooperation. 

Sincerely, 

Steven Potter 

Air Pollution Control Engineer, Mobile Source Inventory 
Sample Locomotive Cover Letter and Survey Sheet

F - 72 

CT Department of Environmental Protection

79 Elm Street, 5th Floor ♦ Hartford, CT 06106 ♦ 860-424-3385 ♦ 860-424-4063 fax 

Please complete the following information and return by March 31, 2003

Railroad Co. Name ______________________________________________ 

Total track mileage of Line Haul locomotives for 2002 ________________ 

Total track mileage of Switchyard locomotives for 2002 ________________ 

Location of Switchyard(s) _________________________________________ 

Connecticut specific information for 2002

Diesel fuel use by Line Haul Locomotives____________________________________________ 

Coal fuel use by Line Haul Locomotives ____________________________________________ 

Diesel fuel use by Yard Locomotives ____________________________________________ 

Coal fuel use by Yard Locomotives _____________________________________________ 

If Connecticut specific information is not available, then complete information below.

Connecticut and system wide information for 2002

Gross ton-miles traffic density in CT _____________________________________________ 

Gross ton-miles traffic density systemwide ____________________________________ 

Diesel fuel use by Line Haul Locomotives systemwide _________________________________ 

Coal fuel use by Line Haul Locomotives system wide_________________________________ 

Name (Print) __________________________ Title _________________________ 

Telephone ___________________________ E-mail_________________________ 

This information can be E-mailed to me at Steven.Potter@po.state.ct.us or faxed to 860-424-4063. 
F - 73 

4.5 SMALL STATIONARY SOURCE FUEL USE

Small stationary source fuel use is divided into three categories: residential, commercial/institutional, 

and industrial. This source category includes small boilers, furnaces, heaters, and other heating units too 

small to be considered point sources. The area source fuel use for each fuel type is determined by 

subtracting the annual point source fuel use from the annual state total fuel use. The emissions are 

estimated by multiplying the quantity of fuel consumed by the appropriate emission factor. The 

emission factors used in these calculations are from AP-42. The total fuel consumed for each category 

and fuel type was calculated using data obtained from the Energy Information Administration, which 

publishes the State Energy Data Reports. Data for 2005 consumption of residual and distillate oil were 

available, however, 2005 data were not available for natural gas, liquid propane gas, and coal use. 

Instead 2004 data were used for natural gas, liquid propane gas and coal consumption and assumed to be 

representative of 2005 consumption. 

4.5.1 Residential Fuel Use

For residential fuel use, the fuel was apportioned to the counties relative to the number of housing units 

in a county. The number of housing units in each county were obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau 

and are listed on Table 4.5.1-1. Housing data were not available for 2005 since it was not a census year. 

It was assumed that the number of housing units in 2000 is representative of housing in 2005. 

According to the Energy Information Administration: 557,893 thousand gallons of distillate oil 

(including kerosene) were used in 2005; and 44,000 million cubic feet of natural gas, 72,408 thousand 

gallons of liquid propane gas, and 0 tons of anthracite coal were used in 2004. 

Coal is used for space heating. Emissions resulting from burning coal occur only in the winter. Oil, 

natural gas, and liquid propane gas are used for space heating and the heating of water. Natural gas and 

liquid propane gas may also be used for appliances such as, ovens and clothes dryers. Therefore, 

emissions resulting from burning these fuels occur all year. Summertime emissions result from such 

things as heating water, cooking and clothes drying. To estimate summertime fuel use the DEP relied 

on the Energy Information Administration (EIA) data, which lists the amount of each fuel type 

consumed by end use and census region9

. The end uses were broken out into 4 different categories; all 

uses, space heating, water heating, and appliances. There were 4 different census regions; Northeast, 

Midwest, South and West. Consumption data for Northeast Region was used and assumed to be 

representative of Connecticut households’ relative fuel consumption between space heating, and water 

heating and appliances. These data were found in Tables 1, 2 and 3 of their website at 

http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/recs/byfuels/2001/byfuels_2001.html. The most recent data available was 

for 2001. According to the EIA data, 4,166 million gallons of oil were consumed for all residential uses 

in the Northeast, of which 900 million gallons were used for water heating. Therefore it is estimated 

that 22% of household oil used was for water heating. A similar calculation was done for liquid propane 

gas and natural gas. It was determined that 49% and 28% of liquid propane gas and natural gas, 

respectively were used for the heating of water and the running of appliances. It was assumed that the 

residential combustion of oil, natural gas and liquid propane gas takes place seven days a week 

throughout the year. There are no residential sources in the Point Source Inventory. 
F - 74 

Summertime emissions resulting from burning coal are set equal to zero. The emissions resulting from 

burning oil, natural gas, and liquid propane gas on a typical ozone summer day are calculated using the 

following equation: 

Where: 

E = daily county emissions for fuel type expressed in pounds per day 

EF = emission factor for the pollutant and fuel type 

Q = State total annual residential fuel used expressed in units compatible with the 

emission factor 

ADJ = 22%, 28% and 49% of oil, natural gas and liquid propane gas were used for 

heating water and/or appliances, respectively. No coal was used for heating water 

and/or appliances 

H = housing units for fuel type in a county(Table 4.5.1-1) 

HT = State total housing units for fuel type (Table 4.5.1-1) 

365 = 365 days per year, unit conversion factor 

A sample CO calculation for oil use on a typical summer day in Hartford County is: 

E = 361.93 lbs. CO per day 

To determine the CO emissions resulting from burning a fuel other than wood on a typical winter day, 

the typical daily CO emissions resulting from heating water (the same as typical ozone summer day CO 

emissions as calculated above) are added to the typical winter daily CO emissions resulting from space 

heating. 

According to the Local Climatological Data of NOAA16, the heating degree-days (HDD) measured at 

Bradley Airport in 2005 was 6,185. For the 90-day winter period (January, February and December) 

there were 3,387 -degree days at Bradley Airport in 200516, or 54.76 percent of the yearly total. 

Therefore, it is assumed that 54.76 percent of the fuel used for space heating is consumed in January, 

February, and December. As stated above, all coal use is for space heating. Twenty-two percent, 28% 

and 49% of oil, natural gas, and liquid propane gas, respectively, were used for hot water and/or 

appliances. Therefore, the remaining 78%, 72% and 51% of oil, natural gas, and liquid propane gas, 

respectively were used for space heating. 

HT x 365

H x ADJ x Q x EF = E

434,682365

905,14622.0 557,89305

 x 

 x x x . = E
F - 75 

The CO emissions resulting from burning a fuel other than wood on a typical winter day are calculated 

using the following equation: 

Where: 

E = daily county emissions for fuel type expressed in pounds per day 

EF = emission factor for the pollutant and fuel type5

Q = State total annual residential fuel used expressed in units compatible with the 

emission factor9

ADJ = 22%, 28% and 49% of oil, natural gas and liquid propane gas were used for 

heating water and/or appliances, respectively. No coal was used for heating water 

and/or appliances 

 H = housing units for fuel type in a county (Table 4.5.1-1) 

0. 5476 = 54.76% of fuel used for space heating in January, February, and December 

365 = 365 days per year, unit conversion factor 

90 = 90 days in January, February, and December, unit conversion factor 

HT = State total housing units for fuel type (sum from Table 4.5.1-1) 

A sample CO calculation for oil use on a typical winter day in Hartford County is: 

E = 3,211.72 lbs. CO per day 

HT x 90

0.5 x H x ADJ)( x Q x EF + 

HT x 365

H x ADJ x Q x EF = E 1 − 476

434,682

905,1462 557,893 476

434,682

905,1462 557,893

 x 90

0.5 x x )0.2(1 x x 5.0 + 

 x 365

 x 0.2 x x 5.0 = E −
F - 76 

 Table 4.5.1-1 

Summary of Household Residential Fuel Use 

No. of No. of Gas No. of Oil No. of LPG No. of Coal 

County Household Household Household Household Household

Fairfield 339,466 104,967 162,898 6,737 164 

Hartford 353,022 135,763 146,905 7,522 384 

Litchfield 79,267 8,892 46,349 1,902 136 

Middlesex 67,285 6,074 40,271 1,942 56 

New Haven 340,732 103,904 157,016 6,450 253 

New London 110,674 10,411 65,677 3,335 231 

Tolland 51,570 3,753 34,897 1,545 118 

Windham 43,959 3,786 28,421 1,659 77

State Total 1,385,975 377,550 682,434 31,092 1,419
F - 77 

Table 4.5.1-2

Summary of Emissions from Residential Fuel Use of Natural Gas

Gas Daily Daily Daily Winter Annual An

No. of (mil cu. CO VOC NOx CO CO V

County Households ft/year) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (tons/year) (ton

Fairfield 104,967 12,232.9 375.37 51.61 882.11 2,518.97 244.66 3

Hartford 135,763 15,821.9 485.50 66.76 1,140.91 3,258.00 316.44 4Litchfield 8,892 1,036.3 31.80 4.37 74.73 213.39 20.73 

Middlesex 6,074 707.9 21.72 2.99 51.04 145.76 14.16 New Haven 103,904 12,109.1 371.57 51.09 873.18 2,493.46 242.18 3

New London 10,411 1,213.3 37.23 5.12 87.49 249.84 24.27 

Tolland 3,753 437.4 13.42 1.85 31.54 90.06 8.75 Windham 3,786 441.2 13.54 1.86 31.82 90.86 8.82 

State Total 377,550 44,000.0 1,350.14 185.64 3,172.82 9,060.34 880.00 12
F - 78 

Table 4.5.1-3

Summary of Emissions from Residential Fuel Use of #2 Fuel Oil

#2 Oil Daily Daily Daily Winter Annual An

No. of (1,000 CO VOC NOx CO CO V

County Households gal/year) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (tons/year) (ton

Fairfield 162,898 133,169.9 401.33 57.23 1,444.80 3,561.37 332.92 4

Hartford 146,905 120,095.5 361.93 51.61 1,302.95 3,211.72 300.24 4Litchfield 46,349 37,890.5 114.19 16.28 411.09 1,013.31 94.73 1

Middlesex 40,271 32,921.7 99.22 14.15 357.18 880.43 82.30 1New Haven 157,016 128,361.3 386.84 55.16 1,392.63 3,432.77 320.90 4

New London 65,677 53,691.3 161.81 23.07 582.51 1,435.87 134.23 1

Tolland 34,897 28,528.5 85.98 12.26 309.51 762.94 71.32 1Windham 28,421 23,234.3 70.02 9.99 252.08 621.36 58.09 

State Total 682,434 557,893.0 1,681.32 239.76 6,052.76 14,919.75 1,394.73 19
F - 79 

Table 4.5.1-4 

Summary of Emissions from Residential Fuel Use of Liquid Propane Gas 

LPG Daily Daily Daily Winter Annual An

No. of (1,000 CO VOC NOx CO CO V

County Households gal/year) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (tons/year) (ton

Fairfield 6,737 15,689.3 40.02 11.37 294.87 132.52 14.90 

Hartford 7,522 17,517.5 44.68 12.70 329.23 147.96 16.64 Litchfield 1,902 4,429.4 11.30 3.21 83.25 37.41 4.21 

Middlesex 1,942 4,522.6 11.54 3.28 85.00 38.20 4.30 New Haven 6,450 15,021.0 38.31 10.89 282.31 126.87 14.27 

New London 3,335 7,766.6 19.81 5.63 145.97 65.60 7.38 

Tolland 1,545 3,598.0 9.18 2.61 67.62 30.39 3.42 Windham 1,659 3,863.5 9.85 2.80 72.61 32.63 3.67 

State Total 31,092 72,408.0 184.69 52.49 1,360.87 611.60 68.79 1
F - 80 

4.5.2 Commercial/Institutional Fuel Use

For commercial/institutional fuel use, statewide annual fuel was apportioned to the counties relative to 

the number of non-manufacturing employees in a county. The number of non-manufacturing employees 

by county in 2005 was obtained from the Connecticut Labor Department, Employment Security 

Division12 and is listed in Table 4.5.2-1. Similar to residential fuel use the statewide annual fuel use data 

for commercial/institutional operations were obtained from the Energy Information Administration. 

According to the Energy Administration: 14,690 thousand gallons of residual oil; and 120,939 thousand 

gallons of distillate oil (including kerosene) were used in 2005; and 36,000 million cubic feet of natural 

gas, 12,768 thousand gallons of liquid propane gas, and 4,000 tons of anthracite coal were consumed in 

2004. 

A computer search of the 2005 Point Source Inventory was used to determine the total statewide 

commercial/institutional fuel use that was accounted for in the Point Source Inventory. The fuel use by 

commercial/institutional sources already accounted for in the Point Source Inventory was subtracted 

from the total commercial/institutional fuel use to avoid being double counted. The fuel used by 

commercial/institutional sources from the Point Source Inventory is as follows: residual oil, 1,544 

thousand gallons; distillate oil, 5,199 thousand gallons; natural gas, 4,630 million cubic feet; liquid 

propane, 22 thousand gallons; and anthracite coal, zero. 

In this category, coal would only be used for space heating, a wintertime activity. As in the residential 

fuel use category, the emissions resulting from burning oil, natural gas, and liquid propane gas occur all 

year. Data are not available to calculate the amount of annual fuel used for purposes other than space 

heating as it was in the residential fuel use category. Therefore, the seasonal adjustment factors listed on 

Table 5.8-1 in the EPA Procedures document were used. The seasonal adjustment factor for the summer 

ozone season is 0.6 and the seasonal adjustment factor for the winter CO season is 1.4. Activities 

requiring the use of these fuels can take place seven days a week. 

The annual fuel used in a county is calculated for each type of fuel using the following equation: 

NMET

NME − x PT) (QT = Q
F - 81 

Where: 

Q = annual county fuel use expressed in the same units as QT 

 QT = state total annual commercial/institutional fuel used 

 PT = state annual commercial/institutional fuel use from Point Source 

Inventory in same units as QT 

 NME = number of non-manufacturing employees in a county12

 NMET = number of non-manufacturing employees in the state 12

 

A sample calculation for distillate oil use in Hartford County is: 

389,482,1

426,445 − 199,5939,120 x ) ( = Q

 Q = 34,777.4 x 1,000 gallons 

Summertime emissions resulting from burning coal were set equal to zero. Emissions resulting from 

burning oil, natural gas, and liquid propane gas on a typical ozone summer day and a typical CO winter 

day are calculated using the following equation: 

Where: 

 E = daily county emissions for fuel type expressed in pounds per day 

 EF = emission factor for the pollutant and fuel type5

 Q = annual county fuel used expressed in units compatible with EF 

 ADJ = seasonal adjustment factor which 0.6 for ozone season and 1.4 for CO season 

 365 = 365 days per year, unit conversion factor 

A sample CO calculation for a typical ozone summer day for distillate oil use in Hartford County is: 

365

 x x 60.04.777,340.5 = E

 E = 285.84 lbs. CO per day 

365

ADJ x Q x EF = E
F - 82 

A sample CO calculation for a typical winter day for distillate oil use in Hartford County is: 

 E = 666.96 lbs. CO per day 

4.5.3 Industrial Fuel Use

For industrial fuel use, statewide annual fuel was apportioned to the counties relative to the number of 

manufacturing employees in a county. The number of manufacturing employees in 2005 by county were 

obtained from the Connecticut Labor Department, Employment Security Division12 and is listed on 

Table 4.5.3-1. Similar to residential and commercial fuel use the statewide annual fuel use data were 

obtained from the Energy Information Administration. According to the Energy Administration: 45,599 

thousand gallons of residual oil; and 23,920 thousand gallons of distillate oil (including kerosene) were 

used in 2005; and 21,000 million cubic feet of natural gas, 41,874 thousand gallons of liquid propane 

gas, and 0 tons of anthracite coal consumed in 2004. 

A computer search of the 2005 Point Source Inventory was used to determine the total statewide 

industrial fuel use that was accounted for in the Point Source Inventory. The fuel use by industrial 

sources already accounted for in the Point Source Inventory must be subtracted from the total industrial 

fuel use. The total fuel use by industrial sources from the Point Source Inventory is as follows: residual 

oil, 43,896 thousand gallons; distillate oil, 4,515 gallons; natural gas, 13,583 million cubic feet; liquid 

propane gas, 269 thousand gallons; anthracite coal, 84 tons. 

The industrial sector uses fuel primarily to provide process heat. Space heating requirements consume a 

quantity of fuel that is not significant. Therefore, the fuel use by industrial sources is uniform 

throughout the year. Activities requiring the use of these fuels can take place six days a week. 

The annual fuel used in a county is calculated for each type of fuel using the following equation: 

Where: 

Q = annual county fuel use expressed in the same units as QT 

 QT = state total annual industrial fuel used 

 PT = state annual industrial fuel use from Point Source inventory in same units as QT 

 ME = number of manufacturing employees in a county from Table 4.5.3-1 

 MET = number of manufacturing employees in the state sum from Table 4.5.3-1 

A sample calculation for distillate oil use in Fairfield County is: 

365

 x x 4.14.777,340.5 = E

MET

ME − x PT) (QT = Q
F - 83 

Q = 4,251.9 x 1,000 gallons 

The emissions resulting from fuel use by industrial sources on a typical ozone summer day and a typical 

CO winter day are calculated using the following equation: 

Where: 

E = daily county emissions for fuel type expressed in pounds per day 

 EF = emission factor for the pollutant and fuel type 5

Q = annual county fuel used expressed in units compatible with EF 

6 = 6 activity days per week, unit conversion factor 

52 = 52 weeks per year, unit conversion factor 

A sample CO calculation for distillate oil use in Fairfield County is: 

E = 68.14 lbs. CO per day 

316,197

235,43 − 515,4920,23 x ) ( = Q

52 x 6

Q x EF = E

526

9.251,40.5

x

 x = E
F - 84 

 Table 4.5.2-1

Emissions Summary from Commercial Heating Using Natural Gas

Non-Mfg. 

Employees Area Gas Daily CO Daily VOC Daily NOx Winter CO Annual CO Annu

County by County (mil ft3/yr) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (tons/year) (ton

Fairfield 391,211 8,278.7 285.79 77.57 1,360.88 666.83 86.93 2

Hartford 445,426 9,426.0 325.39 88.32 1,549.48 759.24 98.97 2Litchfield 53,792 1,138.3 39.30 10.67 187.12 91.69 11.95 

Middlesex 60,873 1,288.2 44.47 12.07 211.76 103.76 13.53 New Haven 345,878 7,319.4 252.67 68.58 1,203.19 589.56 76.85 2

New London 116,011 2,455.0 84.75 23.00 403.56 197.74 25.78 Tolland 37,163 786.4 27.15 7.37 129.28 63.35 8.26 

Windham 32,035 677.9 23.40 6.35 111.44 54.60 7.12 

State Total 1,482,389 31,370.0 1,082.91 293.93 5,156.70 2,526.78 329.39 8
F - 85 

 Table 4.5.2-2 

Emissions Summary from Commercial Heating Using Residual (#6) Oil 

Non-Mfg. 

Employees Area #6 Oil Daily CO Daily VOC Daily NOx Winter CO Annual CO Annua

County by County (1000 gal) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (tons/year) (tons

Fairfield 391,211 3,469.3 28.51 6.44 313.66 66.53 8.67 1

Hartford 445,426 3,950.1 32.47 7.34 357.13 75.75 9.88 2

Litchfield 53,792 477.0 3.92 0.89 43.13 9.15 1.19 0

Middlesex 60,873 539.8 4.44 1.00 48.81 10.35 1.35 0New Haven 345,878 3,067.3 25.21 5.70 277.32 58.82 7.67 1New London 116,011 1,028.8 8.46 1.91 93.01 19.73 2.57 0Tolland 37,163 329.6 2.71 0.61 29.80 6.32 0.82 0

Windham 32,035 284.1 2.33 0.53 25.68 5.45 0.71 0

State Total 1,482,389 13,146.0 108.05 24.42 1,188.54 252.11 32.87 7
F - 86 

Table 4.5.2-3 

Emissions Summary from Commercial Heating Using Liquid Propane Gas 

Non-Mfg. 

Employees Area LPG Daily CO Daily VOC Daily NOx Winter CO Annual CO Annua

County by County (1000 gal) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (tons/year) (tons

Fairfield 391,211 3,363.7 10.51 2.99 77.41 24.51 3.20 0

Hartford 445,426 3,829.9 11.96 3.40 88.14 27.91 3.64 1Litchfield 53,792 462.5 1.44 0.41 10.64 3.37 0.44 0

Middlesex 60,873 523.4 1.63 0.46 12.05 3.81 0.50 0New Haven 345,878 2,974.0 9.29 2.64 68.44 21.67 2.83 0

New London 116,011 997.5 3.12 0.89 22.96 7.27 0.95 0

Tolland 37,163 319.5 1.00 0.28 7.35 2.33 0.30 0Windham 32,035 275.4 0.86 0.24 6.34 2.01 0.26 0

State Total 1,482,389 12,746.0 39.81 11.31 293.33 92.89 12.11 3
F - 87 

Table 4.5.2-4 

Emissions Summary from Commercial Heating Using Coal 

Non- Mfg. 

Employees Area Coal Winter Day Annual CO Annual VOC 

County by County (tons) CO (lbs/day) (tons/year) (tons/year) 

Fairfield 391,211 1,055.6 364.42 47.50 5.28 

Hartford 445,426 1,201.9 414.93 54.09 6.01 Litchfield 53,792 145.1 50.11 6.53 0.73 Middlesex 60,873 164.3 56.70 7.39 0.82 New Haven 345,878 933.3 322.20 42.00 4.67 New London 116,011 313.0 108.07 14.09 1.57 Tolland 37,163 100.3 34.62 4.51 0.50 Windham 32,035 86.4 29.84 3.89 0.43 

State Total 1,482,389 4,000.0 1,380.89 180.00 20.00 
F - 88 

Table 4.5.2-5 

Emissions Summary from Commercial Heating Using Distillate (#2) Oil 

Non-Mfg. 

Employees Area #2 Oil Daily CO Daily VOC Daily NOx Winter CO Annual CO Annua

County by County (1000 gal) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (tons/year) (tons

Fairfield 391,211 30,544.5 251.05 25.61 1,004.20 585.78 76.36 7

Hartford 445,426 34,777.4 285.84 29.16 1,143.36 666.96 86.94 8Litchfield 53,792 4,199.9 34.52 3.52 138.08 80.55 10.50 1

Middlesex 60,873 4,752.8 39.06 3.98 156.25 91.15 11.88 1New Haven 345,878 27,005.0 221.96 22.64 887.83 517.90 67.51 6

New London 116,011 9,057.8 74.45 7.59 297.79 173.71 22.64 2

Tolland 37,163 2,901.6 23.85 2.43 95.39 55.65 7.25 0Windham 32,035 2,501.2 20.56 2.10 82.23 47.97 6.25 0

State Total 1,482,389 115,740.0 951.29 97.03 3,805.14 2,219.67 289.35 29
F - 89 

Table 4.5.3-1 

Summary of Emissions from Industrial Heating Using #2 Oil 

Area Ind. 

Mfg. Employees #2 Oil Daily CO Daily VOC Daily NOx Annual CO Annual 

County by County (1000 gal) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (tons/year) (tons/y

Fairfield 43,235 4,251.9 68.14 2.73 272.56 10.63 0.4

Hartford 59,883 5,889.2 94.38 3.78 377.51 14.72 0.5Litchfield 11,437 1,124.8 18.03 0.72 72.10 2.81 0.1Middlesex 10,814 1,063.5 17.04 0.68 68.17 2.66 0.1New Haven 43,633 4,291.1 68.77 2.75 275.07 10.73 0.4New London 17,691 1,739.8 27.88 1.12 111.53 4.35 0.1Tolland 3,518 346.0 5.54 0.22 22.18 0.86 0.0

Windham 7,105 698.7 11.20 0.45 44.79 1.75 0.0

State Total 197,316 19,405.0 310.98 12.44 1,243.91 48.51 1.9
F - 90 

Table 4.5.3-2 

Summary of Emissions from Industrial Heating Using Liquid Propane Gas 

Area Ind. 

Mfg. Employees LPG Daily CO Daily VOC Daily NOx Annual CO Annual 

County by County (1000 gal) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (tons/year) (tons/y

Fairfield 43,235 9,116.3 93.50 15.78 555.16 14.59 2.4

Hartford 59,883 12,626.6 129.50 21.85 768.93 20.20 3.4

Litchfield 11,437 2,411.5 24.73 4.17 146.86 3.86 0.6

Middlesex 10,814 2,280.2 23.39 3.95 138.86 3.65 0.6New Haven 43,633 9,200.2 94.36 15.92 560.27 14.72 2.4New London 17,691 3,730.2 38.26 6.46 227.16 5.97 1.0Tolland 3,518 741.8 7.61 1.28 45.17 1.19 0.2

Windham 7,105 1,498.1 15.37 2.59 91.23 2.40 0.4

State Total 197,316 41,605.0 426.72 72.01 2,533.64 66.57 11.2
F - 91 

Table 4.5.3-3 

Summary of Emissions from Industrial Heating Using Natural Gas 

Mfg. EmployeesArea Ind. Gas Daily CO Daily VOC Daily NOx Annual CO Annual 

County by County (mil ft3/yr) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (tons/year) (tons/y

Fairfield 43,235 1,625.2 109.39 29.69 520.89 17.06 4.6

Hartford 59,883 2,251.0 151.51 41.12 721.46 23.64 6.4

Litchfield 11,437 429.9 28.94 7.85 137.79 4.51 1.2

Middlesex 10,814 406.5 27.36 7.43 130.29 4.27 1.1New Haven 43,633 1,640.1 110.39 29.96 525.69 17.22 4.6New London 17,691 665.0 44.76 12.15 213.14 6.98 1.9Tolland 3,518 132.2 8.90 2.42 42.38 1.39 0.3

Windham 7,105 267.1 17.98 4.88 85.60 2.80 0.7

State Total 197,316 7,417.0 499.22 135.50 2,377.24 77.88 21.1
F - 92 

Table 4.5.3-4 

Summary of Emissions from Industrial Heating Using Residual Oil 

Area Ind. 

Mfg. Employees #2 Oil Daily CO Daily VOC Daily NOx Annual CO Annual 

County by Zone (10^3 gal) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (lbs/day) (tons/year) (tons/y

Fairfield 43,235 373.2 5.98 0.48 65.78 0.93 0.0

Hartford 59,883 516.8 8.28 0.66 91.11 1.29 0.1Litchfield 11,437 98.7 1.58 0.13 17.40 0.25 0.0

Middlesex 10,814 93.3 1.50 0.12 16.45 0.23 0.0New Haven 43,633 376.6 6.04 0.48 66.39 0.94 0.0

New London 17,691 152.7 2.45 0.20 26.92 0.38 0.0

Tolland 3,518 30.4 0.49 0.04 5.35 0.08 0.0Windham 7,105 61.3 0.98 0.08 10.81 0.15 0.0

State Total 197,316 1,703.0 27.29 2.18 300.21 4.26 0.3
F - 93 

4.7 REFERENCES FOR SECTION 4

 1. Connecticut Population and Housing Characteristics, 1990 Census Complete Count Data and 

1999 population data, Connecticut State Data Center, Office of Policy and Management, From 

OPM’s website, October 2000. 

 2. State of Connecticut Department of Revenue Services, Excise Tax Subdivision, 92 Farmington 

Ave., Hartford, CT 06105. 

 3. Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies, Abatement of Air Pollution. Section 221-174 of the 

Connecticut General Statutes. 

 4.. Petroleum Product Vendor Registration Program FY90, Office of Policy and Management, 

Energy Division, State of Connecticut, 1992. 

 

5. Compilation of Air Pollution Emission Factors (AP-42), Fifth Edition, with supplements A, B, C, 

D, E, and F, US EPA, OAQPS, Research Triangle Park, NC, May 1998. 

 6. User's Guide to MOBILE 6.1 and 6.2 Mobile Source Emission Factor Model, Document 

EPA420-R-03-010, US EPA, OMS, August 2003. 

 7. 1990 Base Year Ozone And Carbon Monoxide Emissions Inventory, Department of 

Environmental Protection, State of Connecticut, Hartford, CT. November 1993. 

 8. Department of Transportation, State of Connecticut, Wethersfield, CT. 

 9. 2001 Residential Energy Consumption Survey: Household Energy Consumption and 

Expenditures Tables, Energy Information Administration, EI 30, 1000 Independence Avenue, 

SW, Washington, DC 20585 

10. Procedures for the Preparation of Emission Inventories for Carbon Monoxide and Precursors of 

Ozone, Vol. 1, US EPA, OAQPS, May 1991. 

11. Fax from Bill Cronin, Federal Aviation Administration, New England Region, Boston, MA, June 

1998. 

12. Connecticut Labor Department, Employment Security Division, Office of Research and 

Information, State of Connecticut, Hartford, CT, 96. 

 

13. Bureau of Engineering and Highway Operation, Department of Transportation, State of 

Connecticut, August 1997. 
F - 94 

14. Acres of Farmland by Town in 1996, Fred Schmura, Office of Policy and Management, State of 

Connecticut, May 1998. 

15. Surface Impoundment Modeling System (SIMS) Version 2.0 User's Manual, OAQPS, US EPA, 

Research Triangle Park, NC, Sept. 1990. 

16. Local Climatological Data Monthly Summary, Bradley Field, Hartford & LaGuardia Airport, 

New York, US Department of Commerce, NOAA, 1996. 

17. Pesticides Industry Sales And Usage: 1992 and 1993 Market Estimates, Document 

 733-K-94-001, US EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, June 1994. 

18. Connecticut Housing Production and Permit Authorized Construction, 1990, Connecticut 

Department of Housing, 1990. 

19. Summary of Social, Economic, and Housing Characteristics, Bureau of Census, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, Washington, DC, 1991. 

20. Residential Use of Wood fuel in Connecticut, RPM Systems Inc., New Haven, CT, Oct 1991. 

21. The Climate of Connecticut, State Geological and Natural History Survey, Joseph J. Brumbach, 

Bulletin #99, 1968. 

22. Bakery Production and Marketing Magazine, June. 

23. Solid Waste Management Plan State of Connecticut, Connecticut Department of Environmental 

Protection, 1983. 

24. Study of Stage I Rule Effectiveness in Connecticut, Connecticut Department of Environmental 

Protection, Debra Tedford, 1995. 

25. Telephone Conversation with Dennis Greci, Connecticut Department of Environmental 

Protection, Bureau of Water Protection and Land Reuse, July, 1997. 

26. Description of Establishment of Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Inventory, Connecticut 

Department of Environmental Protection, Scott Koschwitz, June 1998. 

27. Telephone Conversation with Pat Mitchell, Hudson Company, Providence, RI June 1998. 

28. EIIP Area Sources Preferred and Alternative Methods, US EPA OAQPS, July 1997. 

29. Email from Bradford Robinson To Chris Mulcahy, Connecticut Department of Environmental 

Protection, Bureau of Materials Management and Compliance Assurance, October 4, 2000 
F - 95 

30. Report MA28F-Paint and Allied Products, U.S. Census Bureau, Department of Commerce, 

Washington D.C. 

31. Highway Statistics for 2001, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Washington, D.C. 

32. Data Needs and Availability for Wild Land Fire Emission Inventories- Short-term Improvements 

to the Wild Land Fire Component of the National Emission Inventory, EC/R Incorporated, 

Chapel Hill, NC 

33. MARAMA Control Analysis and Documentation for Residential Wood Combustion in the 

MANE-VU Region, prepared by James E. Houck and Brian N. Eagle, OMNI Environmental 

Services, Inc., 5465 SW Western Avenue, Suite G, Beaverton, Oregon 97005 

34. MANE-VU Residential Wood Burning Combustion Emission Inventory, prepared by E.H. 

Pechan & Associates, Inc., P.O. Box 1345, 6245 Pleasant Valley Road, El Dorado, CA 95623 

35. Solvent Mass Balance Approach For Estimating VOC Emissions From Eleven Nonpoint Solvent 

Source Categories, EC/R Incorporated, Chapel Hill, NC. 

36. Control Measure Development Support Analysis of Ozone Transport Commission Model Rules, 

E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. 5528-B Hempstead Way, Springfield, VA 22151. 

37. Notice of Public Meeting to Consider the Approval of California’s Portable Gasoline-Container 

Emissions Inventory, California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA, September 1999 (MSC 

99-25). 

38. Portable Fuel Containers, Area Source Calculation Methodology Sheets for the 2002 Periodic 

Emission Inventory, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, NJ. 

39. Email from Dana Placzek To Chris Mulcahy, Connecticut Department of Labor, Office of 

Research, January 16, 2007. 

40. Estimating Emissions Associated with Portable Fuel Containers (PFCs), United States 

Environmental Protection Agency, February 2007. 

41. Physical Housing Characteristics for Occupied Housing Units: 2005 American Community 

Survey, United States Census Bureau Website. 

42. 2002 National Emission Inventory Version 3, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 

September 2007.