alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 13 (Monday, January 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-224]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee <greek-i>13883; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 94-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee 
(<greek-i>13883) meeting:

    Date and Time: February 8-9, 2007, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Place: L'Enfant Plaza Hotel, 480 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., 
Washington, DC 20024.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. G. Wayne Van Citters, Director, Division of 
Astronomical Sciences, Suite 1045, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 703-292-4908.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations to the 
National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and 
Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 
on issues within the field of astronomy and astrophysics that are of 
mutual interest and concern to the agencies.
    Agenda: To hear presentations of current programming by 
representatives from NSF, NASA, DOE and other agencies relevant to 
astronomy and astrophysics; to discuss current and potential areas 
of cooperation between the agencies; to formulate recommendations 
for continued and new areas of cooperation and mechanisms for 
achieving them.

    Dated: January 17, 2007.
Susanne E. Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-224 Filed 1-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-30588

CHRISTOPHER VERDIN, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

CHARLES COOK, in his individual and official capacity; JOE CEHAN, 

Deputy, in his individual and official capacity; CODY GUILBEAUX, Deputy, 

in his individual and official capacity; JERRY LARPENTER, Sheriff, in his 

individual and official capacity, Jointly and severally, 

 Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:18-CV-548

Before BARKSDALE, HIGGINSON, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 10, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-30588 Document: 00515338371 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/10/2020
# C_2012058EN.01001401.xml

| 25.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/14

---

Action brought on 29 December 2011 — Morison Menon Chartered Accountants and Others v Council

(Case T-656/11)

2012/C 58/26

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Morison Menon Chartered Accountants (Dubai, United Arab Emirates); Morison Menon Chartered Accountants — Dubai Office (Dubai); and Morison Menon Chartered Accountants — Sharjah Office (Sharjah, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: H. Viaene, T. Ruys and D. Gillet, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Council implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2011 of 1 December 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran (1) and Council Decision 2011/783/CFSP of 1 December 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (2) insofar as they concern the applicants; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Council implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2011 of 1 December 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran (1) and Council Decision 2011/783/CFSP of 1 December 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (2) insofar as they concern the applicants;

1

2

| — | Order the Council to pay the costs incurred by the applicants, as well as its own. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council to pay the costs incurred by the applicants, as well as its own.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of their action, the applicants rely on three pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging






  — | an infringement of the duty to state reasons on the part of the Council, as well as the applicants’ rights of defence, in particular the right to be heard and to an effective judicial remedy; |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging

—

an infringement of the duty to state reasons on the part of the Council, as well as the applicants’ rights of defence, in particular the right to be heard and to an effective judicial remedy;

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging






  — | a manifest error of assessment on the part of the Council; |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging

—

a manifest error of assessment on the part of the Council;

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging






  — | an infringement of the right to property. |
| --- | --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging

—

an infringement of the right to property.

---

(1)  OJ L 319, 2.12.2011, p. 11

1

(2)  OJ L 319, 2.12.2011, p. 71

2

---
§ 35.10-15 Emergency lighting and power systems—T/ALL. ( a ) Where fitted, it shall be the duty of the master to see that the emergency lighting and power systems are tested and inspected at least once in each week that the vessel is navigated to be assured that the system is in proper operating condition.
( b ) Internal combustion engine driven emergency generators shall be tested under load for at least 2 hours, at least once in each month that the vessel is navigated.
( c ) Storage batteries for emergency lighting and power systems shall be tested at least once in each 6-month period that the vessel is navigated to demonstrate the ability of the storage battery to supply the emergency loads for the period of time specified in table 112.05-5(a) of this chapter.
( d ) The date of the tests required by this section and the condition and performance of the apparatus shall be noted in the vessel's Official Logbook or in logs or records considered to take the place of the Official Logbook.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16709, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGFR 70-143, 35 FR 19905, Dec. 30, 1970]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              168,675
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                        (169,675)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   168,675
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (168,675)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (168,675)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (168,675)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.034)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.034)
        



</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)

**Title:**  National compensation survey. State andlocal government. State College, PA
2007,2008,2009

 
SuDoc:L2.121/57:ST 1/����������� 
�Item Number: 0768-B-55 (online)
CGP system Number: 000743878
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                2,504
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               400
<OTHER-SE>                                         (2,904)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1,804
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      70
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (1,874)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (1,874)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (1,874)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
§ 45.69 Correction for bow height. ( a ) The minimum summer freeboard of all manned vessels must be increased by the same amount in inches as any deficiency which may be shown by the following formulas: ( 1 ) For vessels having a length of not less than 79 feet and not greater than 550 feet, 0.593 *L* (1.0-*L*/1640) inches—actual bow height
( 2 ) For vessels having a length greater than 550 feet, (341.6—0.227 L) inches—actual bow height
( b ) Where the bow height is obtained by sheer, the sheer must extend for at least 15 percent of the length of the vessel measured from the forward perpendicular.
( c ) Where the bow height is obtained by a superstructure, the superstructure must be enclosed and extend from the stem to a point at least 0.06 *L* abaft the forward perpendicular.
( d ) Vessels which, to suit exceptional operational requirements, cannot meet the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section may be given special consideration by the Commandant.
( e ) The bow height is defined as the vertical distance at the forward perpendicular between the waterline corresponding to the assigned summer freeboard at the designed trim and the top of the exposed deck at side.
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

N O . 09

- 22

- 00201

- CV

__________________

MICHAEL W. BORN AND PAMELA M. BORN , Appellant s

V.

RSL CONTRACTORS, LTD AND ROBERT S. LYONS , Appellee s

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 457th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 20

- 01

- 00491

- CV

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Michael W. Born and Pamela M. Born

, a ppellant s , filed an unopposed motion

to dismiss th eir appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). The Borns filed the ir motion

to di s mi ss before the Court decided the appeal.

We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id . 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISM I SSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on December 7, 2022

O pinion Delivered December 8, 2022

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Henry R. Carabelli, President and Chief Executive Officer of Pac-West Telecomm, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



1. The Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 14th day of November, 2003.







|/s/Henry R.Carabelli
Henry R. Carabelli
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending December 27, 2008

|Filer                           | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------
|CENTENNIAL BANK                 | * Branch       | Centennial Bank, Conway, Arkansas, to establish a branch facility to be located at 1631 Highway 25B N, Heber Springs, Arkansas.                                                            | Newspaper:01/03/2009Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                      | 01/03/2009    
|Federal Register:               | Not applicable
|MID AMERICA BANKING CORPORATION | CIC            | Notice by Leon Dale Loveall, individually, and acting in concert with Marlese Loveall, both of Columbia, Missouri, to gain control of Mid America Banking Corporation, Columbia, Missouri. | Newspaper:12/31/2008Federal Register:01/13/2009    
|Newspaper:                      | 12/31/2008    
|Federal Register:               | 01/13/2009    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Daniels, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Daniels*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 12.]

(Nos. 98-669 and 98-810

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided November 25, 1998.)

*Ronald J. O’Brien,*Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Steven L. Taylor,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

*Judith M. Stevenson,*Franklin County Public Defender, and *Allen V. Adair,*Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
# C_2011347EN.01003701.xml

| 26.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/37

---

Action brought on 19 September 2011 — Streng v OHIM — Gismondi (PARAMETRICA)

(Case T-495/11)

2011/C 347/67

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Michael Streng (Erding, Germany) (represented by: A. Pappert, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Fulvio Gismondi (Roma, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 July 2011 in case R 1348/2010-4, and refer the case back to the Fourth Board of Appeal; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 July 2011 in case R 1348/2010-4, and refer the case back to the Fourth Board of Appeal; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘PARAMETRICA’, for services in classes 36 and 42 — Community trade mark application No 6048433

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: German trade mark registration No 30311096 of the word mark ‘parameta’, for services in classes 35, 38, 41 and 42

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the decision of the Opposition Division and rejected the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Rules 19(2) and (3) in connection with Rule 98(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95, as the Board of Appeal wrongly considered that the submitted documents containing WIPO INID codes are not in the language of the proceedings and/or taken together with the translation provided in the writ of 3 November 2008, do not constitute ‘translation’ within the meaning of Rule 98(1) CTMIR.

Pleas in law:

---
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.2a

                    AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO 1998 STOCK OPTION PLAN

THIS INSTRUMENT, dated April 6, 2004, is an amendment to that certain 1998 Stock
Option Plan of Kupper Parker Communications, Inc.

WHEREAS section 17 of the 1998 Stock Option Plan of Kupper Parker
Communications, Inc. ("Plan") permits the amendment of the Plan;

WHEREAS the stockholders of Kupper Parker Communications, Inc. have approved
amendment of this plan on this date;

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises, the Plan is hereby
amended as follows effective as of April 6, 2004:

1.   Section 5 of the Plan (as amended by Amendment No. 1 and Amendment No. 2 to
     the Plan) is amended by the deletion of the first sentence thereof and the
     insertion in lieu thereof of the following:

     "The Committee may, but shall not be required to, grant, in accordance with
     this Plan, Options to purchase an aggregate of up to 850,000 shares, which
     may be either Treasury Shares or authorized but unissued shares."

2.   Except as specifically amended hereby the Plan shall remain in full force
     and effect.

FURTHER, there have been scriveners' errors in the titles of previous amendments
to the Plan in that the original plan was adopted in 1988, but superseded by the
1998 Plan and amendments No. 1 and No. 2 to the 1998 Plan are erroneously titled
"Amendment No. 1 to the 1988 Stock Option Plan" and "Amendment No. 2 to the 1988
Stock Option Plan," and Kupper Parker Communications, Inc. hereby corrects such
error and clarifies in writing that the proper title of such amendments to the
plan should be "Amendment No. 1 to the 1998 Stock Option Plan" and "Amendment
No. 2 to the 1998 Stock Option Plan." IN WITNESS WHEROF, the undersigned has
executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written upon the
consent of the Board of Directors and the Stockholders.

KUPPER PARKER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


By:
    -----------------------------------------------
    Randolph L. Seeling, Secretary and Treasurer