alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- 1 - Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director and Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 1212 New York Avenue NW Washington, DC 20005 202.842.4184 sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

December 21, 2011

via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Notice of Dormancy (Various U.S.-Mexico Routes) Dockets DOT-OST-2010-0133, DOT-OST-2010-0196, DOT-OST-2010-0230

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

Delta hereby provides notice to the Department that it has ceased own-metal operations on the following U.S.-Mexico routes:

U.S. Point Mexican Point Docket Number Issue Date Minneapolis/St. Paul Mexico City DOT-OST-2010-0133 5/27/2010 Austin Cancun DOT-OST-2010-0196 8/6/2010 San Antonio Cancun DOT-OST-2010-0196 8/6/2010 Memphis Mexico City DOT-OST-2010-0230 9/14/2010

Delta has no objection to the withdrawal of its own-metal designation on these routes.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

cc: Service ListCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A copy of the foregoing has been served this 21st day of December, 2011 upon the following persons via email:

Carrier Name Email Address
Alaska Marshall Sinick msinick@ssd.com
American Carl Nelson carl.nelson@aa.com Frontier/Republic Bob Cohn robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com Frontier/Republic Pat Rizzi patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com
JetBlue Jonathan Hill jhill@dowlohnes.com
JetBlue Robert Land robert.land@jetblue.com
Southwest/AirTran Bob Kneisley bob.kneisley@wnco.com Spirit Airlines David Kirstein dkirstein@yklaw.com Spirit Airlines Joanne Young jyoung@yklaw.com Sun Country John Fredericksen John.Fredericksen@suncountry.com United/Continental Dan Weiss dan.weiss@united.com United/Continental Jonathan Linde jonathan.linde@united.com United/Continental Steve Morrissey steve.morrissey@united.com US Airways Benjamin Slocum benjamin.slocum@usairways.com US Airways Howard Kass howard_kass@usairways.com
USA 3000 Pierre Murphy pmurphy@lopmurphy.com Virgin America Barbara Russell barbara.russell@virginamerica.com

brian.hedberg@dot.gov info@airlineinfo.com
# C_2008179EN.01001201.xml

| 16.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/12

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 179/06)

| Aid No | XS 75/08 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Sweden |
| Region | — |
| Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid | Stöd till insatser på livsmedelsområdet |
| Legal basis | 8, 9 och 12 §§ förordningen (2008:80) om stöd till insatser på livsmedelsområdet |
| Annual expenditure planned or overall amount of aid granted to the company | Aid scheme | Annual overall amount | SEK 10 480 000 for 2008, SEK 21 480 000 for 2009 and 2010. Amounts include aid under Article 15(2)(c) and (d) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 |
| Loans guaranteed | — |
| Individual aid | Overall aid amount | — |
| Loans guaranteed | — |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Articles 4(2)-4(6) and 5 of the Regulation | Yes (Article 5) |
| Date of implementation | 1.5.2008 |
| Duration of scheme or individual aid award | Until 31.12.2010 |
| Objective of aid | Aid to small and medium-sized enterprises | Yes |
| Economic sectors concerned | Limited to specific sectors | Yes |
| Other industrial sectors | Food industry |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Statens jordbruksverk |
| S-551 82 Jönköping |
| Large individual aid grants | In conformity with Article 6 of the Regulation |

Aid No

XS 75/08

Member State

Sweden

Region

—

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving individual aid

Stöd till insatser på livsmedelsområdet

Legal basis

8, 9 och 12 §§ förordningen (2008:80) om stöd till insatser på livsmedelsområdet

Annual expenditure planned or overall amount of aid granted to the company

Aid scheme

Annual overall amount

SEK 10 480 000 for 2008, SEK 21 480 000 for 2009 and 2010. Amounts include aid under Article 15(2)(c) and (d) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006

Loans guaranteed

—

Individual aid

Overall aid amount

—

Loans guaranteed

—

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Articles 4(2)-4(6) and 5 of the Regulation

Yes (Article 5)

Date of implementation

1.5.2008

Duration of scheme or individual aid award

Until 31.12.2010

Objective of aid

Aid to small and medium-sized enterprises

Yes

Economic sectors concerned

Limited to specific sectors

Yes

Other industrial sectors

Food industry

Name and address of the granting authority

Statens jordbruksverk

S-551 82 Jönköping

Large individual aid grants

In conformity with Article 6 of the Regulation

---
##### 








---



##### 



-2-




---



##### 



-3-




---



##### 



-4-




---



##### 



-5-




---



##### 



-6-




---



##### 



-7-




---



##### 



-8-




---



##### 



-9-




---



##### 



-10-




---



##### 



-11-




---



##### 



-12-




---



##### 



-13-




---



##### 



-14-




---



##### 



-15-




---



##### 



-16-




---



##### 



-17-
#### BEN HORWECH, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NEVIN BUS LINE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Submitted May term, 1929

Decided June 28, 1929.

Before Justices Parker, Black and Bodine.

Eor the plaintiff-respondent, *Nathan Zimader*and *Jacob Femberg. ■*

Eor the defendant-appellant, *Record, Biggins & Teese.*

Per Curiam.

This case was commenced in the Bayonne District Court on July 5th, 1928. The summons was returnable on July 12th, 1928. The state of the case shows that thereafter it *595was on the court’s calendar a number of times, viz., five times, until on November 13th, at the request of the defendant, the case was adjourned until November 23d and marked “peremptorily,” and then at the request of the defendant, the case was adjourned to two o’clock, at that time the defendant presented an affidavit of George Cassidy for a further adjournment on account of an absent witness,, Joseph Hogan, who, when an effort was made the day before to subpoena him he could not be found. This is the sole ground of appeal in this case alleged as error. This we think was not error. It was a matter resting in the discretion of the trial court. *Moss*v. *Newmark,*6 *N. J. Mis. R.*1040. The judgment of the Bayonne District Court is therefore affirmed, with costs.
Elizabeth Bisbey

- Kuehn

525 Camino de los Marquez, Suite 1

Air Quality Bureau

Santa Fe, NM 87507

505

- 476

- 4338

Education

At tended M.S c . Program in Soil Science, 08/2003

- 12/2004

Univer sity of Kentucky, Lexington, KY

B.S. in Environmental Studies

Universit y of Iowa, Iowa City, IA., conferred May 2002.

Employment Experience

01/2013 to present

Acting Technical Services Manager, Air Quality Bureau, NMED

05 /2012

– 10/2012

Acting Minor Source Section Manager, Air Quality Bureau, NMED

02/28/2005 to present

Pe rmit Specialist , Major Source Permit Section

, Air Quality Bureau, NM ED

My primary responsibilities involve performing technical analyses of air quality permit applications;

drafting permits in accordance with federal and state regulations; accomplishing s pecial projects in

support of the section, mentoring new staff, and assisting the regulated community and concerned

citizens.

08/2002

- 05/2003 and 08/2003

- 12/2004

Teaching and Research Assistant, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY

Introduction to So il Science, Agronomy Department

Teaching Assistant, Un iversity of Iowa, Iowa City, IA

Introduction to Earth Systems Science, Geography Department

Introduction to Environmental Science, Geoscience Department

Professional Development and Training Courses

Effective Permit Writing Permit Practices and Procedures I and II

Sources and Control of PM Emissions NSR Reform and Advanced PSD

Introduction to Hazardous Air Pollutants Basic NSR/PSD

Control of Gaseous Emissions Environmental Negotiations

Vol unteer with the Santa Fe Botanical Garden, Johnson County Natural Resources Conservation Service,

and Railyard Community Stewards
**EXHIBIT 99.6**I, Gerald W. Grandey, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 40-F of Cameco Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis annual report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and theaudit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
 

 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 31, 2008         */s/ Gerald W. Grandey*   Gerald W. Grandey   President & Chief Executive Officer
----

----

| ENTITY*                                     | JURISDICATION OF INCORPORATION |
|---------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                                        |                           |
| Cimatron Gibbs LLC**                        | United States                  |
| Cimatron Technologies, Inc.                 | United States                  |
| Cimatron Technologies, Inc.                 | Canada                         |
| Cimatron GmbH                               | Germany                        |
| Microsystem Srl                             | Italy                          |
| Cimatron Japan K.K                          | Japan                          |
| Cimatron Technologies (P) Ltd               | India                          |
| Cimatron (Beijing) Technology Co. Ltd.      | China                          |
| Cimatron (Guangzhou) Technology Co. Ltd.*** | China                          |
| Korea Cimatron Technologies Co. Ltd.        | Korea                          |

----

----
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending June 14, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Oklahoma Advisory Committee tothe U.S. Commission on Civil Rights

| **Stephanie C. Hudson, *Chairperson*Oklahoma City      
 **Richard Mack Bettis, J.D.Tulsa      
**Sylvia H. MoralesOklahoma City
**Sylvia R. BorregoOklahoma City      
**Cu D. NguyenOklahoma City
**Charles L. FaginOklahoma City      
**Aurora Ramirez-HeltonTulsa
**Dr. Donald J. MaletzNorman      
**Swannie "Jill" Z.      TarbelTulsa
**Dr. Earl D. Mitchell, Jr.Stillwater
**Opio ToureOklahoma City
**Acknowledgments

The Oklahoma AdvisoryCommittee wishes to thank the staff of the Commission�s Central RegionalOffice for its help in the preparation of this report. The project was theprincipal assignment of Ascension Hernandez, with support from Corrine Sanders.The project was carried out under the overall supervision of Melvin L. Jenkins,Director, Central Regional Office.************************   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**Exhibit 31.3****CERTIFICATION**PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION:I, Patrick G. Mackey, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report.  2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this Annual Report.  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this Annual Report.  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant, and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this Annual Report, is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this Annual Report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this Annual Report, based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the Audit Committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: September 28, 2006          /s/ Patrick G. Mackey Patrick G. Mackey    Senior Vice President    (Principal Accounting Officer)
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-20563

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 PlaintiffAppellee,

versus

ANGELA SMITH,

 DefendantAppellant.

-----------------------------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:04-CR-12-1

-----------------------------------------------------------

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Angela Smith appeals the sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for

possession with the intent to distribute a quantity of crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §

841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B). Finding no reversible error, we AFFIRM.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 30, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
 

Smith argues that, in light of United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), the district

court reversiblyerred in imposing a sentence utilizingthe Sentencing Guidelines asmandatory. Smith

contends that she preserved the issue at her sentencing hearing by citing Blakely v. Washington, 124

S. Ct. 2531 (2004), in connection with a request she made to the court that did not involve the

court’s determination of her sentence. This argument lacks merit because Smith’s request was not

relevant to her invocation of Blakely and also because counsel stated that there was no defense

objection to the presentence report.

Since Smith did not preserve a Booker issue, we review only for plain error. See United

States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-

9517). Application of the Guidelines as mandatory in determining a defendant’s sentence is plain or

obvious error after Booker. See United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo, 407 F.3d 728, 732-34 (5th

Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (July 25, 2005) (No. 05-5556). However, Smith cannot show that

the error affected her substantial rights because the record does not indicate that the district court

would have imposed a lowersentence under an advisory, rather than a mandatory, guideline scheme.

Therefore, Smith is not entitled to relief on grounds of plain error. See id. at 733-34. 

AFFIRMED.
**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |                                              |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | /s/ Howard              M. Siegel            |
|        |   |   | Howard              M. Siegel                     |
|   |   |   | Chief              Executive              Officer |

**A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been      provided to American Medical Alert Corp. and will be retained by American      Medical Alert Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission      or      its staff upon request.**

----