alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 10.08

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (this "Amendment") between
Cardinal Health, Inc., an Ohio corporation (the "Company") and George L.
Fotiades (the "Executive") is effective February 4, 2005 (the "Amendment Date").

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are parties to that certain
Employment Agreement dated February 1, 2004 between the Company and the
Executive (the "Employment Agreement"), pursuant to which the Executive serves
as the Company's President and Chief Operating Officer;

         WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the
Company has determined, in connection with a review of the Executive's
compensation at the first anniversary of the Executive serving as President and
Chief Operating Officer of the Company, to modify certain components of the
Executive's compensation;

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to set forth in writing
these modifications to the compensation arrangements of the Executive;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, in consideration of the mutual
covenants herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to be
legally bound hereby, agree as follows:

         1. Salary. Effective as of the Amendment Date, Section 3(a) of the
Employment Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the term "$725,000" with
"$790,000".

         2. Annual Bonus. Effective as of the Amendment Date, Section 3(b) of
the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the phrase "one hundred
and sixty percent (160%)" with "one hundred and forty percent (140%)".

         3. Allowance. Effective as of the Amendment Date, the automobile
allowance previously provided by the Company to the Executive is hereby
discontinued and terminated.

         Except as specifically amended by the provisions of this Amendment, all
terms of the Employment Agreement are unmodified and remain in full force and
effect.


CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.


 /s/ Robert D. Walter                            /s/ George L. Fotiades
------------------------------------             ------------------------------
Robert D. Walter                                 GEORGE L. FOTIADES
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
§ 401.335 Suspension or revocation of a Certificate of Authorization. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76351 , Sept. 17, 2024.
( a ) The Director may issue an order to suspend or revoke a Certificate of Authorization if— ( 1 ) The holder of a Certificate of Authorization does not continue to meet the requirements under § 401.320; or
( 2 ) The holder of a Certificate of Authorization does not comply with the requirements of this part.
( b ) Before issuing an order to suspend or revoke, the Director notifies the holder of a Certificate of Authorization of the reasons for the proposed suspension or revocation and gives the holder an opportunity to be heard or to comply with the requirements of this part.
( c ) If the Director finds that the violation of a requirement of this part involves public health, interest, or safety, or that the violation is willful, the Director may issue an order to suspend the Certificate of Authorization without giving notice under paragraph (b) of this section. The order shall contain the reasons for the Director's action.
( d ) A holder who has its Certificate of Authorization suspended under paragraph (c) of this section shall have an opportunity to be heard by notifying the Director in writing.
( e ) The Director shall reinstate a Certificate of Authorization that has been suspended under paragraph (b) or (c) of this section when he determines that the holder is complying with this part.
[CGD 74-233, 40 FR 41527, Sept. 8, 1975. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 32655, June 25, 1996, and further redesignated and amended by USCG-1998-3976, 63 FR 35139, 35140, June 29, 1998]
#### John Hallock Drake, *Respondent, v.*Susan Rice, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc*.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion

*Per Curiam.*
#### Orville W. Ramsey, *Respondent, v.*John Felton, *Appellant.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Haight, J.
#### § 30.30-9 Evaluation.

Materials submitted in accordance with this subpart will be evaluated by comparison to the regulations in parts 5, 10, and 13 of this chapter, and by comparison to the U.S. laws referenced in those regulations.

[CGD 79-081a, 45 FR 23427, Apr. 7, 1980, as amended by CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51043, Sept. 30, 1997]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,085,055
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,429,521
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,344,297
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,108,790
<PP&E>                                       1,898,174
<DEPRECIATION>                                 691,140
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,368,670
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          588,009
<BONDS>                                      2,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,829
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,641,620
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,368,670
<SALES>                                      5,663,733
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,663,733
<CGS>                                        2,936,055
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,892,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               527,562
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,981
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                551,746
<INCOME-TAX>                                   206,169
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            345,577
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   345,577
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .249
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .249
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.2





**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the
      Quarter Ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report") by American Medical Alert Corp.
      ("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.




/s/
                Richard RalloRichard
                RalloChief
                Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 **** has
      been
      provided to and will be retained by the
      Registrant and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Oller, Appellee.

[Cite as *State v. Oiler*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 47.]

(No. 98-1297

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided December 2, 1998.)

*Jim W. Slagle,*Marion County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

*48The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

The trial court’s determination that Herbert Oiler is a sexual predator is reinstated.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          28,064
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      28,984,672
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,038,617
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,878,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,081,777
<BONDS>                                     17,161,190
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (808,792)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,878,736
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,295,927
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,076,819
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,189,165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,447,292)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,447,292)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,447,292)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (95.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2514 

To restore the jurisdiction of the Consumer Product Safety Commission 

over amusement park rides which are at a fixed site, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2009 

Mr. MARKEY of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To restore the jurisdiction of the Consumer Product Safety 

Commission over amusement park rides which are at 

a fixed site, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Amusement 

5 Park Ride Safety Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. JURISDICTION OVER FIXED SITE AMUSEMENT 

7 RIDES. 

8 Section 3(a)(1) of the Consumer Product Safety Act 

9 (15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘, and 

10 which is not permanently fixed to a site. Such term does 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2514 IH

1 not include such a device which is permanently fixed to 

2 a site.’’ and inserting a period. 

3 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

4 There are authorized to be appropriated to the Con5 sumer Product Safety Commission $500,000 for each fis6 cal year to enable the Commission to carry out the Con7 sumer Product Safety Act as amended by this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending November 25, 2006

|Filer                    | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                                 
|------------------------ | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|BANCA INTESA S.P.A.      | 4c8            | Banca Intesa S.p.A., Milan, Italy ("Intesa") request to engage indirectly in certain nonbanking activities conducted thru Banca IMI Securities Corp. New York, New York, following the merger of Sanpaolo IMI S.p.A., Milan, Italy, with and into Intesa.                                 | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:12/08/2006   
|Newspaper:               | Not applicable
|Federal Register:        | 12/08/2006    
|BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, THE | FBSEA          | The Bank of Nova Scotia, Halifax, Canada ("Nova Scotia"),  requests prior approval from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to upgrade Nova Scotia's representative office to a branch office in Houston, Texas, pursuant to Section 211.24(a)(1)(i)(A) of Regulation K. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:               | Not available 
|Federal Register:        | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for First Quarter of 2007 (January 1, 2007 - March 31, 2007)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending October 6, 2007

|Filer                                  | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                                 
|-------------------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|FIRST CORBIN BANCORP, INC.             | * 3A5          | First Corbin Bancorp, Inc. proposed acquistion of Eagle Fidelity, Inc. and it's subsidiary bank Eagle Bank, Inc pursuant to section 3(a)(5) of the BHCA. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:10/11/2007    
|Newspaper:                             | Not available 
|Federal Register:                      | 10/11/2007    
|NORTH SIDE BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, THE | * Branch       | North Side Deposit Bank and Trust Company, Cincinnati, OH to establish a branch at State Route 22 and US 48, Maineville, OH.                             | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                             | Not available 
|Federal Register:                      | Not applicable
|PNC BANK, DELAWARE                     | * 18C* Branch  | Application by PNC Bank, Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware, to acquire by merger Delaware Sterling Bank & Trust Company, Christiana, Delaware               | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                             | Not available 
|Federal Register:                      | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
## P D, R 

# ORIGINAL ,^7^

' !, 

# A^/ /HtSdVpUJ d. fpVUL*?

FILED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

### MAY 04 2015 COURTOFCfliMINft.APPEALS Abel Acosta, Clerk MAy 0l m
2005 Performance Measures under Annual Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.5 
  
 2005 Performance Measures under Annual Incentive Plan 
  
 For 2005, the Compensation Committee established the following performance measures under Ryerson Tull, Inc.’s Annual Incentive Plan:

  
 OROOA (operating profit divided by operating assets) for all
business units except CST (Customer Solutions Team) 
  
 Profitability and Revenue Growth for CST
Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
          PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Atrion
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 13, 2004                                  /s/ Emile A. Battat
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Emile A. Battat
                                                     Chief Executive Officer


         The foregoing certification is made solely for purpose of 18
U.S.C.ss.1350 and not for any other purpose.


                                       17
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2527 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2527

   To provide authority for certain debt refinancing with respect to 
financings approved under title V of the Small Business Investment Act 
                    of 1958, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 2009

    Ms. Markey of Colorado introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide authority for certain debt refinancing with respect to 
financings approved under title V of the Small Business Investment Act 
                    of 1958, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE CERTAIN DEBT REFINANCING.

    During the 2 year period beginning on the date of the enactment of 
this Act, any financing approved under title V of the Small Business 
Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. 695 et seq.) may include debt 
refinancing relating to a conventional loan that is not guaranteed by 
the Small Business Administration, if--
            (1) the proceeds of the indebtedness were used to acquire 
        land, including a building situated thereon, to construct a 
        building thereon, or to purchase equipment;
            (2) the existing indebtedness is collateralized by fixed 
        assets;
            (3) the existing indebtedness was incurred for the benefit 
        of the small business concern;
            (4) the financing under title V of the Small Business 
        Investment Act of 1958 will be used only for refinancing 
        existing indebtedness or costs relating to the project financed 
        under such title;
            (5) the financing under such title will provide a 
        substantial benefit to the borrower when prepayment penalties, 
        financing fees, and other financing costs are accounted for; 
        and
            (6) the financing under section 504 of such title will 
        provide better terms or rate of interest than the existing 
        indebtedness at the time of refinancing.
                                 <all>
```