alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Government Accountability Office

# AGENCY:

Government Accountability Office (GAO).

# ACTION:

Notice of appointments. 

# SUMMARY:

The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 established the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) and gave the Comptroller General responsibility for appointing its members. This notice announces three new appointments and four reappointments to fill the vacancies occurring this year.

# DATES:

Appointments are effective May 1, 2007 through April 30, 2010, except as noted.

# ADDRESSES:

GAO: 441 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20548. MedPAC: 601 New Jersey Avenue, NW., Suite 9000, Washington, DC 20001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

GAO Office of Public Affairs, (202) 512-4800. MedPAC: Mark E. Miller, PhD, (202) 220-3700.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

To fill this year's vacancies I am announcing the following:

Newly appointed members are Thomas M. Dean, M.D., Chief of Staff, Avera Weskota Memorial Medical Center; Jack C. Ebeler, Independent consultant; and Bruce Stuart, PhD, professor and executive director, Peter Lamy Center on Drug Therapy and Aging, University of Maryland Baltimore. Professor Stuart is appointed to complete the remaining two years of Douglas Holtz-Eakin's three-year term that began in 2006. Holtz-Eakin resigned from his position on MedPAC effective May 2, 2007.

Reappointed members are John M. Bertko, F.S.A., M.A.A.A., vice president and chief actuary, Humana Inc.; Francis J. Crosson, M.D., executive director, the Permanente Federation, LLC; Arnold Milstein, M.D., M.P.H., medical director, Pacific Business Group on Health; and William J. Scanlon, PhD, health policy consultant.

(Sec. 4022, Pub. L. 105-33, 111 Stat. 251, 350)

David M. Walker,

Comptroller General of the United States.

[FR Doc. 07-2680 Filed 5-30-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-M
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-50689

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DAVID OROZCO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:16-CR-1838-4

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Orozco appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for 

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute five grams or more of pure 

methamphetamine. Orozco argues that the plea agreement is invalid because 

it is procedurally and substantively unconscionable. In particular, he asserts 

that the plea agreement is procedurally unconscionable because the parties 

were in an unequal bargaining position during the plea negotiation process. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 5, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-50689 Document: 00514417488 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/05/2018
No. 17-50689

2

He further contends that the plea agreement is substantively unconscionable 

because it is “grossly one sided.” Orozco maintains that he gave up numerous 

important rights and received “very little, if anything” in return. He thus 

argues that the plea agreement’s appellate waiver provision is unenforceable. 

Orozco also asserts that his 96-month, within-guidelines sentence was 

substantively unreasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors.

Because Orozco did not challenge the validity of the plea agreement in 

the district court or attempt to withdraw his plea on grounds that the plea 

agreement was unconscionable, we review his claims under the plain error 

standard. See United States v. Vonn, 535 U.S. 55, 58-59 (2002). Our review of 

the plea agreement reveals no clear or obvious error with respect to Orozco’s 

unconscionability arguments. See Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129, 135 

(2009). He offers no other challenge to the waiver’s validity or its application. 

Thus, the waiver bars Orozco’s challenge to the substantive reasonableness of 

his sentence.

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.

 Case: 17-50689 Document: 00514417488 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/05/2018
#### GEORGE BOWLEY, POLICE OFFICER, PROSECUTOR, v. JAMES McFADDEN, DEFENDANT.

Decided July 5, 1929.

Eor the prosecutor, *Robert Peacock.*

Contra, *Ernest Watts.*

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bodine, J.

The petitioner was arrested on November 10th, 1928, for a violation of the Motor Yehicle act. He appeared in court before J. Leedom Smith, a justice of the peace, on November 12th, 19.28, but no action whatever was taken. On November 16th, 1928, in the absence of petitioner, a plea of guilty was entered by the justice of the peace and a fine of $200 and costs was imposed. The conviction must be set aside for the reason that a plea of guilty must be interposed by the defendant charged with crime. It cannot be entered in a defendant’s absence.
#### Office of Disciplinary Counsel *v.*Williams.

[Cite as *Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams*(1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 392.]

(No. 98-1797

Submitted October 28, 1998

Decided January 13, 1999.)

*393
      *Jonathan E. Coughlan,*Disciplinary Counsel, and *John K. McManus,*Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

*Larry Thomas,*for respondent.

*394
      *Per Curiam.*

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent’s misconduct, including his misuse of client funds and his federal felony conviction, represents a serious ethical breach that establishes his present unfitness to practice law in Ohio. See, *e.g., Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Edwards*(1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 72, 73, 689 N.E.2d 535, 536. The record, however, also exhibits his full cooperation with the law enforcement and disciplinary investigations, his willingness to make full restitution, his remorse, and his potential for rehabilitation. Under these circumstances, the recommendation of relator and the board of an indefinite suspension is appropriate. *Disciplinary Counsel v. Stanford*(1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 39, 41, 607 N.E.2d 830, 831; see, also, *Disciplinary Counsel v. Yajko*(1997), 77 Ohio St.3d 385, 674 N.E.2d 684 (attorney’s theft of funds from his law firm on twenty separate occasions, each involving a different client, warranted indefinite suspension).

Accordingly, respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. As a condition of his reinstatement, respondent must make full restitution to the various financial institutions in accordance with his federal sentence, and he must also make full restitution to Ochieng. Upon reinstatement, a mentor appointed by the Columbus Bar Association shall work with respondent during the first year following his reinstatement.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 11 (Thursday, January 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2290-2291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-172]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation 
Research Committee.
    Date: January 30--February 1, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Westin St. Francis, 335 Powell Street, San Francisco, 
CA 94102.
    Contact Person: Katrin Eichelberg, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-0818, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fb909e9298939e97999e899cbb95929a929fd5959293d59c948d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="78131d111b101d141a1d0a1f38161119111c56161110561f170e">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.


[[Page 2291]]


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 10, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-172 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 298.20 Term, redemptions, and interest rate. ( a ) *In general.* The maturity date of the Obligations must be satisfactory to us and must not exceed the anticipated physical and economic life of the Vessel or Vessels or Shipyard Project, and may be less than but no more than: ( 1 ) Twenty-five years from the date of delivery from the shipbuilder of a single new Vessel which is to be security for Guarantees;
( 2 ) Twenty-five years from the date of delivery from the shipyard of the last of multiple Vessels which are to be security for the Guarantees but that the amount of the Guarantees will relate to the amount of the depreciated actual cost of the multiple Vessels as of the Closing;
( 3 ) The later of twenty-five years from the date of original delivery of a reconstructed, or reconditioned Vessel which is to be security for the Guarantees, or at the expiration of the remaining useful life of the Vessel, as we determine; or
( 4 ) The technological life of the Shipyard Project.
( b ) *Required redemptions.* Where multiple Vessels or multiple Shipyard Project assets are to be used as security for the Guarantees, as set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, we may require payments of principal prior to maturity (redemptions) regarding all related Obligations, as we may deem necessary to maintain adequate security for the Guarantees.
( c ) *Interest rate.* We will make a determination as to the reasonableness of the interest rate of each Obligation, taking into account the range of interest rates prevailing in the private market for similar loans and the risks that we assume.
EX 31.1


CERTIFICATION

I, Mel Wyman, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pop N Go, Inc.

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the  "Evaluation Date"); and

c)  presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  I have disclosed, my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors
and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified
for the registrant's auditors any material  weaknesses in internal
controls; and

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6.  I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including
any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date: May 21, 2004

/s/Mel Wyman
------------
Mel Wyman
Chairman, and Chief Financial Officer
(Principle Financial)
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26447-26448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2271]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


First Meeting, Special Committee 214: Data Communications--Next 
Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) & Single European Sky 
ATM Research Initiatives

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 214, Data Communications--Next 
Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) & Single European Sky 
ATM Research Initiatives.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a first 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 214, Data Communication--Next 
Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) & Single European Sky 
ATM Research Initiatives.

DATES: The meeting will be held June 5-7, 2007 from 9 a.m.-5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org for directions.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (P.L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is 
hereby given for a Special Committee 214 meeting. The agenda will 
include:

<bullet> June 5-7:
    <bullet> Opening Plenary Session (Welcome, Introductions, and 
Administrative Remarks, Agenda Review).
    <bullet> RTCA Functional Overview.
    <bullet> ATO Data Communications Program--Overview.
    <bullet> European Data Communications Initiatives--Overview.
    <bullet> Committee Scope--Terms of Reference.
    <bullet> Presentation, Discussion, Recommendations.
    <bullet> Organization of Work, Assign Tasks and Workgroup.
    <bullet> Presentation, Discussion, Recommendations.
    <bullet> Assignment of Responsibilities.
    <bullet> Review first draft of OSED product for e.g. Departure 
Clearance with Revisions, Data Link Task.
    <bullet> Closing Plenary Session (Establish Dates, Location and 
Agenda for Next Meeting, Other Business, Adjourn).

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.


[[Page 26448]]


    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 27, 2007.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 07-2271 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
§ 46.10-25 Equivalents. ( a ) Where in the regulations in this part it is provided that a particular fitting, appliance, apparatus, or type thereof, shall be fitted or carried in a vessel engaged on foreign voyages by sea or that any particular arrangement shall be adopted, there may be substituted any other fitting or appliance or type thereof or any other arrangement provided that the Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, shall have been satisfied by suitable trials that the fitting, appliance, or apparatus, or type thereof, or that the arrangement substituted is at least as effective as that specified in this part.
( b ) Where, in the application of the regulations in this part to passenger vessels engaged in coastwise voyages by sea and on Great Lakes voyages, it is desired to substitute other construction, arrangement, fitting, or appliance, or type thereof, such substitution may be made if approved by the Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, provided the degree of safety provided by this part is obtained.
# C_2014184EN.01003802.xml

| 16.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/38

---

Order of the General Court of 31 March 2014 — El Gazaerly v Council

(Case T-266/11) (1)

1

2014/C 184/61

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 219, 23. 7. 2011.

1

---
#### § 45.73 Winter freeboard.

The minimum winter freeboard (fw) in inches is obtained by the formula:

*fw* =*f*(*s*) + *T* s (200)/*L*

where:

L = length L in feet but not less than 400 feet.
**EXHIBIT
32.2**
 ****
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**
  **PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  I, John
Stanton, the Chief Financial Officer of White Knight SST, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:
  (1) the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
  (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
White Knight SST, Inc. and will be retained by White Knight SST, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
  Dated:
      March 2, 2005/s/
      John StantonName:
      John Stanton
      Title:
      Chief Executive Officer
§ 36.05-1 Installation of cargo tanks—TB/ALL. ( a ) All cargo tanks carrying liquids at elevated temperatures for the purpose of maintaining the material in the molten form shall be installed with the access openings located above the weather deck.
( b ) [Reserved]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

January 9, 2012

Nos. 09

- 3467, 09

- 3731 & 09

- 3965

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

CHRISTOPHER G. WRIGHT,

Appellant (No. 09

- 3467)

RAVINDER S. CHAWLA,

Appellant (No. 09

- 3731)

ANDREW TE ITELMAN.

Appellant (No. 09

- 3965)

(E.D. Pa. No. 2

- 08

- cr

- 00450

- 001/002/004)

Present: AMBRO, CHAGARES and VANASKI E

, Circuit Judges

1. Motion by Appellee USA to Amend the Court’s Opinion dated January 04,

2012 ; and

2. Letter Response by Appellant, Christopher G. Wright, in Opposition to

Motion to Amend the Court’s Opinion dated January 04, 2012.

Respectfully,

Clerk/ dwb

____________________ __ _________ O R D E R

______________________________

The foregoing m otion by Appellee to a mend the Court’s Opinion date d January 4, 2012

is denied. The l etter r esponse construed as a c ross

- m otion by Appellant, Christopher G.

Wright in opposition to the m otion to amend is granted in part and denied in part. The

opinion is amen ded as follows: on page 10, first full paragraph, lines 6

- 7, replace “with

the intent” with “intending, in exchange for the benefits

, ”.

By the Court,

/s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge

Dated: February 7, 2012Appeal Nos. 09

- 3467, 09

- 3731 & 09

- 3965

USA v. C hristopher W ri ght

, R avinder C hawla and A ndrew Teitelman

Page 2

DWB/cc:

Jennifer A. Williams, Esq.

Lisa A. Mathewson, Esq.

Michael J. Bresnick, Esq.

Peter Goldberger, Esq.

Ellen C. Brotman, Esq.