alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 507.160 Communications. ( a ) The agency shall take appropriate steps to ensure effective communication with applicants, participants, personnel of other Federal entities, and members of the public. ( 1 ) The agency shall furnish appropriate auxiliary aids where necessary to afford a handicapped person an equal opportunity to participate in, and enjoy the benefits of, a program or activity conducted by the agency. ( i ) In determining what type of auxiliary aid is necessary, the agency shall give primary consideration to the requests of the handicapped person.
( ii ) The agency need not provide individually prescribed devices, readers for personal use or study, or other devices of a personal nature.
( 2 ) Where the agency communicates with applicants and beneficiaries by telephone, telecommunication devices for deaf person (TDD's) or equally effective telecommunication systems shall be used.
( b ) The agency shall ensure that interested persons, including persons with impaired vision or hearing, can obtain information as to the existence and location of accessible services, activities, and facilities.
( c ) The agency shall provide signage at a primary entrance to each of its inaccessible facilities, directing users to a location at which they can obtain information about accessible facilities. The international symbol for accessibility shall be used at each primary entrance of an accessible facility.
( d ) This section does not require the agency to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens. In those circumstances where agency personnel believe that the proposed action would fundamentally alter the program or activity or would result in undue financial and administrative burdens, the agency has the burden of proving that compliance with § 507.160 would result in such alteration or burdens. The decision that compliance would result in such alteration or burdens must be made by the agency head or his or her designee after considering all agency resources available for use in the funding and operation of the conducted program or activity, and must be accompanied by a written statement of the reasons for reaching that conclusion. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, the agency shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, handicapped persons receive the benefits and services of the program or activity.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 22 06

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Mi gu el Garci a Reyno so ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Peti ti on er

v. Je ffer so n B . Ses si on s, II I, Att or ne y Gene ral of t he Uni te d S ta te s 1
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Resp on de nt

__ __ __ __ __ __ Pet it io n fo r Rev ie w of a n Ord er o f th e Bo ard of I m

m ig rat io n Ap pe al s

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Feb ru ary 23 , 20 17 Fil ed : M arch 8, 2 01 7 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re SM ITH, BOW MAN, an d B ENTON, Ci rcu it Ju dg es
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Je ffer so n B. Ses si on s, III ha s be en ap po in te d to Serv e as Att or ne y Gen eral of 1 th e Uni te d St at es , an d is su bs ti tu te d a s res po nd en t pu rs ua nt to Fed eral Ru le of App el la te Pro ced ur e 4 3( c).Gua te m al an ci ti zen Mi gu el Garci a Reynos o pe ti ti on s fo r rev ie w of an or de r of

t he Bo ard of Im

m ig rat io n App eal s di sm is si ng hi s ap pe al fro m th e de ci si on of a n im m ig rat io n jud ge (IJ ) to de ny wit hh ol di ng of rem ov al

. Afte r care fu l co ns id erat io n, 2
we co nc lu de th at su bs ta nt ia l ev id en ce supp or ts th e de ci si on
. See De Cas tro -Gu ti erre z v. Hol de r, 71 3 F.3 d 37 5, 37 9, 38 1- 82 (8 th Ci r. 20 1 3)

. The pe ti ti on fo r rev ie w is de ni ed . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

R e yno so do es no t ch al le ng e th e IJ ’s de ni al of rel ie f un de r th e Co nv e n t i o n 2 Aga in st Tort ur e, or th e IJ ’s de ni al of hi s as y lu m ap pl ic at io n as un ti m el y ; th us , th os e ru li ng s are no t be fo re us
. See Uli v. Mu ka se y , 53 3 F.3 d 95 0, 95 4 n.2 (8 th Ci r. 20 08 ). -2

-
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 95-21082 Summary Calendar

_____________________ CULLEN CENTER BANK & TRUST, Plaintiff,
versus INVESTMENT CHOICES CORPORATION, ET AL., Defendants. DOV ANVI KAMINETZKY, Appellant,
versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee.

_______________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Southern District of Texas

(CA-H-95-4403)

_______________________________________________________ October 24, 1996 Before REAVLEY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *2

The order of contempt and commitment, dated December 1, 1995, is affirmed for the following reasons. Dov Kaminetzky and his company, Investment Choices, were liable to Cullen Bank for obligations due for a car wash operation. Kaminetzky filed frivolous claims against the successor to Cullen Bank, and many others, because of the liabilities of the car wash and other operations. When the district court dismissed those claims, it entered on March 16, 1995 an order enjoining Kaminetzky from filing any action raising an issue alleged in the prior cases without first obtaining judicial approval. The court’s order put Kaminetzky on notice that a violation could be punished by criminal contempt. On September 7, 1995, Kaminetzky filed a notice of removal in federal court, seeking to remove a state court suit between him and Cullen Bank wherein the Bank sought to recover an obligation owed because of the car wash operation. No judicial approval was sought or obtained for this filing, itself frivolous. The district judge gave Kaminetzky notice that he would be ordered to appear and show cause why he should not be held in contempt for violation of the March 16 order, which order the judge read to Kaminetzky. The hearing was held on December 1, 1995, at which time, after hearing testimony from Kaminetzky and argument by his attorney, the court found Kaminetzky to have committed a knowing3

and willful violation of the March 16 order and remended him to imprisonment for 48 hours. Kaminetzky argues that he had inadequate notice of his violation and of the criminal contempt hearing. The evidence reflects no uncertainty about the proceeding and about the violation. The court’s findings are supported and its order is AFFIRMED.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending September 29, 2007

----

Banks, State MemberCounty Bank, Merced, California  -- to purchase the assets and assume the liabilities of eleven California branches of National Bank of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, and thereby establish branches. 					-Approved, September 24, 2007 					

EnforcementGreat River Bank & Trust, Davenport, Iowa  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.					-Announced, September 26, 2007 					

Regulations And PoliciesBroker Exceptions for Banks  -- final interagency rules regarding the scope of securities activities that banks may conduct in providing banking services to their customers without registering with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a securities broker (Docket No. R-1274).					-Approved, September 24, 2007 					Regulation D  -- final rule implementing the annual indexing of the low reserve tranche, reserve requirement exemption amount, nonexempt deposit cutoff level, and reduced reporting limit for 2008 (Docket No. R-1297). 					-Approved, September 24, 2007 					Unlawful Internet Gambling  -- publication for comment of interagency rule regarding prohibition on funding of unlawful Internet gambling (Docket No. R-1298).					-Approved, September 24, 2007 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: October 4, 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date: 

11 a.m., Friday, June 22, 2007.

# Place: 

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status: 

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered: 

Surveillance Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information: 

Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan, 

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-2531 Filed 5-17-07; 11:21 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000827082
<NAME> SMARTSOURCES.COM INC

<S>                                        <C>             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999     SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998     OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999     SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         164,200           1,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  184,800         405,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                    36,500          11,100
<INVENTORY>                                          0               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               443,800         417,500
<PP&E>                                         764,300         727,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                 272,500         150,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,956,900       1,426,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          277,000         432,400
<BONDS>                                              0               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0               0
<PREFERRED>                                          0               0
<COMMON>                                     1,821,300             100
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,086,200)     (2,225,800)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,956,900       1,426,700
<SALES>                                        721,000       1,571,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               721,000       1,571,100
<CGS>                                                0               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,971,500         995,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               115,700         319,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,300          63,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,366,200)         255,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                   693,400       (102,700)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,250,500)         575,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0               0
<CHANGES>                                            0               0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (672,800)         152,900
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)            0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)            0.02


</TABLE>
#### Solomon Adler and Isaac S. Adler, *Respondents, v.*Mina Simon, *Appellant, Impleaded, et*c.

Order reversed and motion to open default granted, without costs to either party of appeal, or of motion below. Opinion

*Per Curiam.*
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2019 of Aura Systems, Inc. (the “Company”)
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Melvin Gagerman, Chief
Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Report.



|Date: June 13, 2019 | By: | /s/
    MELVIN GAGERMAN
|------------------- | --- | -----------------------
|                    |     |                        
|                    |     |                        
|                    |     |
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*George, Appellee.

[Cite as *State v. George*(1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 278.]

(No. 98-1634

Submitted November 10, 1998

Decided January 6, 1999.)

*279
      *Stephanie Tubbs Jones,*Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Michael A. Sullivan,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *State v. Rush*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 53, 697 N.E.2d 634.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### § 555.1 Purpose.

It is the purpose of the regulations of this part to establish procedures to implement the Foreign Shipping Practices Act of 1988, as amended by the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998, which authorizes the Commission to take action against foreign carriers, whose practices or whose government's practices result in adverse conditions affecting the operations of United States carriers, which adverse conditions do not exist for those foreign carriers in the United States. The regulations of this part provide procedures for investigating such practices and for obtaining information relevant to the investigations, and also afford notice of the types of actions included among those that the Commission is authorized to take.

[64 FR 8010, Feb. 18, 1999]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending September 1, 2007

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                               | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|BANK OF WHITMAN   | * Branch       | Bank of Whitman, Colfax, Washington, to establish a branch facility at 12812 N. Addison, Spokane, Washington. | Newspaper:08/31/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 08/31/2007    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
FILED

U.S. District court,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU^f

2016JUL22 ftHil:Ol

FOR THE DISTRICT OF WYOMING sTEPUAH HARRIS. CLERK

CASPER

UNNAMED PLAINTIFF #1,

UNNAMED PLAINTIFF #2,

PILLAR OF LAW INSTITUTE,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

Defendant.

Case No. 16-CV-00135-SWS

CONSENT ORDER AND JUDGMENT

This matter is before the Court on the parties' Notice of Settlement and Stipulated

Consent Order. The parties have resolved and settled this matter and the Court accepts the

settlement. All parties having agreed to entry of this Order and Judgment, it is HEREBY

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that:

1. Counts I and II of Plaintiffs' Verified Complaint are dismissed.

2. The Commission shall not enforce 52 U.S.C. § 30118, as well as any

implementing regulations, against Plaintiffs with regard to the monetary contributions

described in Plaintiffs' complaint made by MCFL corporations to delegates to a national

nominating convention. See Verified Compl. (Doc. No. 1) TlH 31, 53; FEC v. Massachusetts

Citizens for Life, Inc., 479 U.S. 238, 263-64 (1986).

3. Plaintiffs shall not seek fees or costs in this matter.

Case 2:16-cv-00135-SWS Document 27 Filed 07/22/16 Page 1 of 2
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to unseal the docket in this case and all papers and

filings submitted in this case, other than those documents submitted under seal pursuant to

this Court's Order Granting Leave to File Verifications to Complaint and Exhibits

Supporting Motion to Proceed Pseudonymously Under Seal (Doc. No. 3).

5. The Court retains jurisdiction in this case solely to enforce the terms of this

Consent Order.

6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter this Judgment.

Dated this ^ ^ day of July, 2016.

Scott W. Skavdahl

United States District Judge

Case 2:16-cv-00135-SWS Document 27 Filed 07/22/16 Page 2 of 2
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 50703 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Troy Webb,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7

- 20

- CR

- 65

- 1

Before **Wiener, Southwick,** and **Duncan,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

Defendant

- Appellant Troy Webb was convicted after a bench trial of being a felon in possession of a firearm and was sentenced to 70 months in prison and three years of supervised release. On appeal, Webb contends that
the evidence was insufficient to sust ain his conviction. W e focus on whether

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 7, 2021
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-50703 Document: 00515811620 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/07/2021No. 20

- 50703

2 substantial evidence supports the district court’s conclusion that the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt , viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government and deferring to the district court’s
reasonable inferences

. United States v. Tovar , 719 F.3d 376, 388 (5th Cir. 2013).
To obtain a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), the Government must prove that (1) the defendant previously had been convicted of a felony, (2) the de fendant knowingly possessed a firearm, (3) the firearm traveled in
or affected interstate commerce , and (4) the defendant knew his status as a felon when he possessed the firearm

. United States v. Ortiz , 927 F.3d 868, 874 (5th Cir. 2019) ; United States v. Guidry , 406 F.3d 314, 318 (5th Cir. 2005) ; see also United States v. Huntsberry , 956 F.3d 270, 281 (5th Cir. 2020)

. Webb contests only whether there was sufficient evidence that he knowingly possessed a firearm. Webb does not contest his admission that he threw a bag with a shotgun out of a vehicle during a high speed chase and that he knew the bag contained a firearm . Webb’s admission that he knowingly threw the bag containing the shotgun from the vehicle, which was corroborated by the arresting office r’s testimony, is substantial evidence that he possessed the
firearm. See United States v. De Leon , 170 F.3d 494, 496 (5th Cir. 1999) ; United States v. Munoz , 150 F.3d 401, 416 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. Mergerson , 4 F.3d 337, 348 (5th Cir. 1993)

. The evidence was sufficient to justify the district court’s conclusion that Webb was guilty beyond a
reasonable doubt of possession of the firearm. See Tovar , 719 F.3d at 388

.
**AFFIRMED.** Case: 20-50703 Document: 00515811620 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/07/2021
#### Mary A. Jordan and others, *Respondents, v.*Henry S. Wilson and others, *Appellants*.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Brady, J.
#### §§ 507.161-507.169 [Reserved]
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 07-216 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION 

Homeland/Domestic Security Matters 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and AUSTRALIA 

Signed at Washington December 21, 2005 

with 

Annex 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
AUSTRALIA 

Scientific Cooperation: Homeland/Domestic 

 Security Matters 

Agreement signed at Washington December 21, 2005; 

 Entered into force February 16, 2007. 

 With annex.
#### § 167.15-28 Inspection of lifesaving appliances and arrangements.

The inspection of lifesaving appliances and arrangements must be in accordance with the requirements for special purpose vessels in subchapter W (Lifesaving Appliances and Arrangements) of this chapter.

[CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25311, May 20, 1996]
#### The People of the State of New York, *Respondent, v.*John F. Moot, Appellant.

Judgment and conviction affirmed. Opinion by

Bockes, J.