Page 1 of 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

LANEL LOYD, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Respondent. 

Criminal Case No. 15-20394-1 

SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

ARTHUR J. TARNOW 

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

 / 

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR COMPASSIONATE RELEASE [208]

Before the Court is Lanel Loyd’s petition for compassionate release from 

prison due to his medical conditions, which places him at a higher risk of death or 

serious illness from COVID-19. On May 14, 2020, Loyd and the Government filed 

concurrent supplemental briefs [211] [212]. On May 18, 2020, the parties filed 

concurrent responses [213] [214]. The Court held oral argument on May 20, 2020. 

For the reasons stated below and on the record, the Court GRANTS Petitioner’s 

motion. 

Case 2:15-cr-20394-AJT-RSW ECF No. 218 filed 05/21/20 PageID.1512 Page 1 of 12
Page 2 of 12

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On February 1, 2018, Loyd pled guilty to Conspiracy to Possess With Intent 

to Distribute Controlled Substances in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), 846. (ECF 

No. 46, PageID. 149). As this was Loyd’s first federal felony conviction, he had a 

criminal history score of one at the time of sentencing. PreSentence Investigation 

Report ¶ 41; U.S.S.G. Ch. 5, Pt. A. On March 15, 2017, the Court sentenced Mr. 

Loyd to a mandatory minimum of 120 months (10 years) of imprisonment for 

Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substances (Heroin), 

violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(A), 841(a)(1), and 846. (ECF No. 208). Mr. 

Loyd’s projected release date is November 6, 2025. (ECF No. 211-2). 

Mr. Loyd is incarcerated at Federal Correctional Institution Loretto in 

Pennsylvania. In April, 2020, the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) officials at his prison 

told him that he was deemed an appropriate candidate for Home Confinement and 

encouraged him to apply. (ECF No. 211-2). After his family began to prepare for his 

release, they were later told by the BOP that, under a new guideline that required an 

inmate to serve at least 50% of his sentence before being place in home confinement, 

Loyd was no longer eligible. (ECF No. 211, PageID. 1394). Soon after, on May 7, 

2020, Mr. Loyd’s family sent a Letter [208] to the Court asking for his 

compassionate release due to his health condition that puts him at risk of serious 

Case 2:15-cr-20394-AJT-RSW ECF No. 218 filed 05/21/20 PageID.1513 Page 2 of 12
Page 3 of 12

illness from COVID-19. After appointing counsel, the Court ordered briefing on 

Loyd’s motion. (ECF No. 209). 

ANALYSIS

The compassionate release statute states the following in relevant part. 

(A) the court, upon motion of the Director of the Bureau of Prisons, or 

upon motion of the defendant after the defendant has fully 

exhausted all administrative rights to appeal a failure of the Bureau 

of Prisons to bring a motion on the defendant's behalf or the lapse 

of 30 days from the receipt of such a request by the warden of the 

defendant's facility, whichever is earlier, may reduce the term of 

imprisonment (and may impose a term of probation or supervised 

release with or without conditions that does not exceed the 

unserved portion of the original term of imprisonment), after 

considering the factors set forth in section 3553(a) to the extent that 

they are applicable, if it finds that— 

(i) extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant such a 

reduction. 

18 U.S.C.A. § 3582. 

There is no dispute that Loyd has exhausted his administrative remedies. The Court 

thus has three questions to answer: first, whether extraordinary and compelling 

reasons warrant a reduction in sentence, second, whether Defendant poses a danger 

to the community, and third, whether a sentence reduction is consistent with the § 

3553(a) factors. United States v. Amarrah, No. 17-20464, 2020 WL 2220008, at *4 

(E.D. Mich. May 7, 2020). 

Case 2:15-cr-20394-AJT-RSW ECF No. 218 filed 05/21/20 PageID.1514 Page 3 of 12
Page 4 of 12

1. Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons for Release 

In order to determine if extraordinary and compelling reasons exist to release 

Loyd, the Court must determine if a sentence reduction is “consistent with applicable 

policy statements issued by the [United States] Sentencing Commission.” 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(1)(A). The applicable policy statement recites the following: 

1. Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons.--Provided the defendant 

meets the requirements of subdivision (2), extraordinary and compelling 

reasons exist under any of the circumstances set forth below: 

(A) Medical Condition of the Defendant.--

(i) The defendant is suffering from a terminal illness (i.e., a serious 

and advanced illness with an end of life trajectory). A specific prognosis of 

life expectancy (i.e., a probability of death within a specific time period) is 

not required. Examples include metastatic solid-tumor cancer, amyotrophic 

lateral sclerosis (ALS), end-stage organ disease, and advanced dementia. 

(ii) The defendant is-- 

(I) suffering from a serious physical or medical condition, 

(II) suffering from a serious functional or cognitive 

impairment, or 

(III) experiencing deteriorating physical or mental health 

because of the aging process, that substantially diminishes the 

ability of the defendant to provide self-care within the 

environment of a correctional facility and from which he or he 

is not expected to recover 

[. . .] 

(D) Other Reasons.--As determined by the Director of the Bureau of 

Prisons, there exists in the defendant's case an extraordinary and 

compelling reason other than, or in combination with, the reasons 

described in subdivisions (A) through (C). 

U.S.S.G. 1B1.13 

Here, Loyd has presented “Other Reasons” in combination with his serious 

medical conditions, to warrant compassionate release. While the COVID-19 

Case 2:15-cr-20394-AJT-RSW ECF No. 218 filed 05/21/20 PageID.1515 Page 4 of 12
Page 5 of 12

pandemic is devastating in every region it invades, prison populations are subject to 

heightened vulnerability. See, e.g., Danielle Ivory, “We Are Not a Hospital”: A 

Prison Braces for the Coronavirus, N.Y. TIMES (March 17, 2020), 

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/17/us/coronavirus-prisons-jails.html (citing 

densely populated living conditions, shortage of masks, soap, and hand sanitizer, and 

the inability to routinely disinfect surfaces and maintain safe distances between 

inmates and guards as reasons prisoners are at increased risk of infection); See, e.g., 

Courtney Bublé, Federal Prisons Pose ‘Imminent Danger’ in Spreading COVID-19, 

Union Says, GOVERNMENT EXECUTIVE (April 6, 2020), 

https://www.govexec.com/oversight/2020/04/federal-prisons-pose-imminentdanger-spreading-covid-19-union-says/164390/ (detailing a prison workers’ union 

complaint to OSHA complaining of “imminent danger” due to the BOP’s failure to 

follow national safety guidelines). 

Furthermore, the persuasive precedent for granting compassionate release 

under the current circumstances is overwhelming. United States v Andre Williams, 

Case No. 04-cr-95/MCR, at *7 (N.D. Fla. April 1, 2020) (“[A]n outbreak of COVID19 in Williams’ facility would likely have fatal consequences for him. Based on 

these facts, the Court finds that Williams’ deterioration in physical health is 

sufficiently serious to satisfy the medical criteria for a reduction in sentence.”); 

Case 2:15-cr-20394-AJT-RSW ECF No. 218 filed 05/21/20 PageID.1516 Page 5 of 12
Page 6 of 12

United States v. Teresa Ann Gonzalez, No. 2:18-CR-0232-TOR-15, 2020 WL 

1536155, at *3 (E.D. Wash. Mar. 31, 2020) (“Defendant is the most susceptible to 

the devastating effects of COVID-19. He is in the most susceptible age category 

(over 60 years of age) and him COPD and emphysema make him particularly 

vulnerable. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) compassionate release granted.”); United 

States v. Campagna, No. 16 Cr. 78-01 (LGS), 2020 WL 1489829, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. 

Mar. 27, 2020) (“Defendant’s compromised immune system, taken in concert with 

the COVID-19 public health crisis, constitutes an extraordinary and compelling 

reason to modify to Defendant’s sentence on the grounds that he is suffering from a 

serious medical condition that substantially diminishes his ability to provide selfcare within the environment of the RCC.”); United States v. Muniz, No. 4:09-CR0199-1, 2020 WL 1540325 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 30, 2020), at *2 (“Because Defendant is 

at high-risk for severe illness from COVID-19 and because inmates in detention 

facilities are particularly vulnerable to infection, the Court finds that Defendant has 

demonstrated an extraordinary and compelling reason for compassionate release.”). 

Loyd argues that his underlying conditions warrant similar treatment. He 

seeks release due to three medical conditions: severe obesity, hypertension, and 

being immunocompromised from cortisone hip injections. The Center for Disease 

Control (“CDC”) states that people with severe obesity, defined as a body mass 

Case 2:15-cr-20394-AJT-RSW ECF No. 218 filed 05/21/20 PageID.1517 Page 6 of 12
Page 7 of 12

index (“BMI”) of at least 40, have a higher risk of complications from COVID-19 

due to breathing problems. Groups at Higher Risk for Severe Illness, CENTERS FOR 

DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-

ncov/need-extra-precautions/groups-at-highim-risk.html (last visited May 21, 

2020). Loyd came into prison with a BMI of 43. (ECF No. 216-3, PageId. 1503). It 

has fluctuated over time, but his latest medical report from May 8, 2020 states that 

his BMI is at 39.7. (ECF No. 216-1, PageId. 1496). 

Second, Loyd suffers from hypertension, which he is currently being treated 

for. (ECF No. 216-2, PageId. 1499). The CDC states that people with hypertension 

are vulnerable because, a respiratory illness from COVID-19 could “make it harder 

for [a person’s] heart to work, [which] can lead to a worsening of COVID-19 

symptoms.” Groups at Higher Risk for Severe Illness, CENTERS FOR DISEASE 

CONTROL AND PREVENTION, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/needextra-precautions/groups-at-highim-risk.html (last visited May 21, 2020). 

Third, Loyd suffers from severe right hip osteoarthritis, which causes pain and 

physical limitations. As part of his treatment, Loyd received a cortisone steroid hip 

injection last May, 2019, which gave him 2-3 months of pain relief. (ECF No. 216-

1, PageId. 1496). The CDC states that people who have a prolonged use of treatments 

like these have weakened immune systems and are less able to fight a virus like 

Case 2:15-cr-20394-AJT-RSW ECF No. 218 filed 05/21/20 PageID.1518 Page 7 of 12
Page 8 of 12

COVID-19. Groups at Higher Risk for Severe Illness, CENTERS FOR DISEASE 

CONTROL AND PREVENTION, https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/needextra-precautions/groups-at-highim-risk.html (last visited May 21, 2020). 

In opposition the Government argues that these conditions are not severe 

enough because, Loyd’s BMI is just under 40 at 39.7, has primary hypertension, 

rather than pulmonary hypertension, and has received bone injection, rather than an 

intravenous injection. The Government’s arguments about medical minutiae, while 

noted by the Court, are dismissed as unpersuasive. Even if, assuming arguendo, 

Loyd’s conditions do not independently and perfectly fit the definition of severity, 

as outlined by the CDC, all of his conditions compounded still place Loyd in a much 

more vulnerable position than a healthy person, if he were to get COVID-19. See

Jennifer Lighter, Obesity in Patients Younger Than 60 Years Is a Risk Factor for 

COVID-19 Hospital Admission, INFECTIOUS DISEASES SOCIETY OF AMERICA (2020) 

(finding that COVID-19 patients who were younger than 60 with a BMI of at least 

35 are twice as likely to be admitted to acute and critical care). 

The Government also attempts to dissuade the Court’s concerns for Loyd’s 

safety because FCI Lorretto has no reported cases of COVID-19. However, zero 

confirmed cases is likely more a result of a lack of testing than a lack of the virus’ 

presence in the prison. If anything, the Court is more concerned that inmates and 

Case 2:15-cr-20394-AJT-RSW ECF No. 218 filed 05/21/20 PageID.1519 Page 8 of 12
Page 9 of 12

staff members are interacting with one another as normal and blissfully unaware of 

the virus spreading throughout the prison. Another court in our district recently 

found the following about the conditions at FCI Loretto: 

[I]nmates currently “eat, sleep, and interact with each other in a confined 

space, making it easier for the virus to spread once introduced. Inmates 

are still being transferred between facilities. Although they are screened 

for symptoms, they are not tested for the virus, leaving potentially 

asymptomatic individuals to spread the virus to others. While inmates are 

being subjected to mandatory quarantine, they are still not provided basic 

protections from the virus in the facilities. Inmates must purchase their 

own soap. Hand sanitizer is contraband. In low security facilities, inmates 

are being quarantined with their own unit, as opposed to individual cells, 

preventing them from complying with social distancing recommendations 

United States v. Amarrah, No. 17-20464, 2020 WL 2220008 (E.D. Mich. May 7, 

2020). During the Court’s hearing, Mr. Loyd corroborated that he is currently on 

lockdown in his unit in close quarters with approximately 80 other inmates. 

Considering the number of infected people Loyd is unknowingly in contact with, 

continuing to incarcerate him in under these conditions could be a lethal decision. 

The Court refuses to join FCI Loretto in its ignorance of a deadly virus hidden in 

plain sight. Therefore, extraordinary and compelling reasons exist for Loyd’s 

immediate compassionate release. 

2. Danger to the Community 

Federal Sentencing Guideline 1B1.13 provides for compassionate release only 

when “[t]he defendant is not a danger to the safety of any other person or to the 

Case 2:15-cr-20394-AJT-RSW ECF No. 218 filed 05/21/20 PageID.1520 Page 9 of 12
Page 10 of 12

community, as provided in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g).” While in prison Mr. Loyd has 

committed himself to rehabilitation. He has completed a range of classes including 

Auto Mechanics, Parenting, and Weight Management. (ECF No. 211-2). He is also 

enrolled in a GED program and has completed a drug education class. (Id.). He has 

been employed throughout his incarceration, first in food services and now as an 

Orderly. (Id.). He has only had one incident on his disciplinary record from early in 

his incarceration for using another inmate’s ticket to take a picture in the visiting 

room. (Id.). 

Mr. Loyd also has close ties with his family and has stayed in constant contact 

with them; they have even come to visit him on several occasions. Mr. Loyd is 

married and is the father of four boys, the youngest of which is six years old. Defense 

counsel has submitted to the Court several letters from Loyd’s family, including his 

wife, in-laws, and spiritual mentors. The sentiment of each letter is the same: Mr. 

Loyd is a dedicated father who has taken responsibility for his past wrongs and is 

eager to come home and positively impact all of those who look up to him. (ECF 

No. 211-9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17). The fact that the BOP classified him as a minimum 

risk of recidivism (the lowest level) and selected him for home confinement, which 

he would have received but for merely a function of time, gives the Court confidence 

Case 2:15-cr-20394-AJT-RSW ECF No. 218 filed 05/21/20 PageID.1521 Page 10 of 12
Page 11 of 12

to safely release Loyd back into the community. Furthermore, upon his return to the 

community, Loyd will be on supervised release. 

3. Section 3553(a) Factors 

A district court contemplating a motion for compassionate release must 

consider the § 3553(a) sentencing factors. Those are as follows: 

(a) Factors to be considered in imposing a sentence.--The court shall 

impose a sentence sufficient, but not greater than necessary, to comply 

with the purposes set forth in paragraph (2) of this subsection. The court, 

in determining the particular sentence to be imposed, shall consider-- 

(1) the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and 

characteristics of the defendant; 

(2) the need for the sentence imposed-- 

(A) to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, 

and to provide just punishment for the offense; 

(B) to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct; 

(C) to protect the public from further crimes of the defendant; and 

(D) to provide the defendant with needed educational or vocational 

training, medical care, or other correctional treatment in the most effective 

manner; 

(3) the kinds of sentences available; 

(4) the kinds of sentence and the sentencing range established for-- 

(A) the applicable category of offense committed by the applicable 

category of defendant as set forth in the guidelines-- 

18 U.S.C.A. § 3553. 

The Court’s consideration of these factors is explicated both in this opinion’s 

analysis of U.S.S.G. 1B1.13 and on the record of the May 20, 2020 hearing. Loyd’s 

crimes are serious, but the quality of his time in prison has shown tremendous growth 

in his ability to positively impact his family and community. Finally, Loyd’s growth 

Case 2:15-cr-20394-AJT-RSW ECF No. 218 filed 05/21/20 PageID.1522 Page 11 of 12
Page 12 of 12

and medical condition outweigh any marginal benefit he would receive from 

finishing his sentence in prison. A sentence reduction to time-served is therefore in 

line with the § 3553(a) factors. 

CONCLUSION

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Compassion Release [208] is 

GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Loyd be IMMEDIATELY RELEASED

to begin his 5-year term of SUPERVISED RELEASE, as outlined by the March 

29, 2017 Judgment (ECF No. 170), including the following Special Condition: 

The defendant shall participate in a program approved by the probation 

department for substance abuse, which may include testing to determine if the 

defendant has reverted to the use of drugs or alcohol, if necessary. 

SO ORDERED. 

s/Arthur J. Tarnow 

 Arthur J. Tarnow 

Dated: May 21, 2020 Senior United States District Judge 

Case 2:15-cr-20394-AJT-RSW ECF No. 218 filed 05/21/20 PageID.1523 Page 12 of 12