alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Williams, Renee (OST) l^T-Q^T - /9^^'Z f fZ -

From: Samuel, Kathleen A. [Kathleen.Samuel@alcoa.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 3:49 PM 

To: EAS (OST) 

Subject: Cape Air Service - IVIassena NY .^, 

Mr. Dennis DeVany TJ 

D.O.T. Chief, EAS & Domestic Analysis Division i-o 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE XJ 

Washington, DC 20590 t.^ 

fSJ C O 

Mr. DeVany, f^ 

As a twice monthly traveler, I have had the pleasure of utilizing Cape Air flight service between Massena and Albany 

often. Their service and reliability is superior, as is their attentiveness to safety, customer needs and support of the 

communities in which they operate. 

I understand that the Town of Massena has voted to change carriers to a bankrupt carrier with service through Boston 

utilizing a larger aircraft. To me, this arrangement does not make good business sense. When I fly out of Massena my 

fellow passengers' final destination is generally Albany. The Albany connection provides access for educators, hospital 

staff and local government officials to their headquarters, eliminating overnight stays for meetings and eliminating the 

drive through the Adirondacks. For those with destinations outside the state, Albany Airport is well run and small 

enough to make even tight connections easy to make. 

The Cessna 402 aircraft utilized by Cape Air is large enough to handle 8 passengers. Rarely have I had a full flight in the 

two years I have been flying in and out of Massena. How can the larger plane offered by the newly proposed carrier be 

cost effective? Would this market really support filled flights in and out of Boston? I doubt it, and the short-term 

service with larger aircraft in the past confirms my doubts. 

Although the vote has been cast not to support Cape Air's extension bid, I understand that the FAA and D.O.T. have a say 

in the decision. Your department has most likely considered the same concerns I'm addressing here, still, I feel strongly 

that Cape Air is a good fit for Massena and was compelled to voice my concerns. 

Thank you for your time and consideration. 

Sincerely, 

Kathleen A. Samuel 

HQttySamud 

Quality System Lead Auditor 

Alcoa - Lafayette Operations 

3131 Main Street 

Lafayette, IN 47905 

phone: (765) 771 -3161 /(315)764-4467 

fax: (765) 771-3237 

mobile: (765) 404-3844 

Home Address: 5873 Chase Mills, NY 13621 

Home Phone: (315) 769-6473
89–008 

111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 111–655 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE SENATE AMENDMENTS TO THE 

BILL (H.R. 3081) MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF 

STATE, FOREIGN OPERATIONS, AND RELATED PROGRAMS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2010, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2010.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Ms. SLAUGHTER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1682] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1682, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of the Senate 

amendments to H.R. 3081, the Continuing Appropriations Act, 

2011. The resolution makes in order a motion offered by the chair 

of the Committee on Appropriations or his designee that the House 

concur in the Senate amendments to H.R. 3081. The resolution provides one hour of debate on the motion equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. The resolution waives all points of order 

against consideration of the motion except those arising under 

clause 10 of rule XXI. Finally, the resolution provides that the Senate amendments and the motion shall be considered as read. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the motion (except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI) includes a 

waiver of section 302(f) of the Congressional Budget Act regarding 

consideration of legislation providing new budget authority in excess of a subcommittee’s 302(b) allocation of such authority. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with REPORTS
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending November 19, 2005

|Filer                   | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                  | End of Comment Period                                  
|----------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|BRYN MAWR TRUST COMPANY | Premises       | The Bryn Mawr Trust Company, Bryn Mawr, PA, request approval to  increase its investment in bank premises in the amount of $2.3 million and therefore exceed the premises limitations set forth in Regulation H. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:              | Not applicable
|Federal Register:       | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Horace Smith *et al., Appellants, v.*The City of Rochester, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs on the opinion of Bumsey, J. (See, also, *Black, River Improvement Co.*v. *La Crosse Brewery Co.,*Opin. of Taylor, J., 25 Alb. L. J., 458.)
exv10w1



 






Exhibit 10.1




     On April 21, 2004, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Cypress Communications Holding Co.,
Inc., then known as U.S. RealTel, Inc. (the “Company”), approved by unanimous written consent the
following resolution amending the employment agreement of Mr. Gregory P. McGraw, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company:



     FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee,
hereby authorizes, approves and consents to the amendment of the employment agreement of Mr. McGraw
to (i) reflect a $50,000 per annum reduction in his salary from $300,000.00 per annum to
$250,000.00 per annum, except where the base salary is used for calculating severance payment
amounts, in the event of a qualified termination event, (ii) provide that Mr. McGraw is eligible
for an executive incentive bonus plan equal to $100,000.00 upon the completion of 100% of the
performance objectives set by the Board for fiscal year 2004, and (iii) provide that Mr. McGraw
shall be granted, under a separate Option Grant Award, incentive stock options, subject to the
terms and conditions of the U.S. RealTel 1999 Employee Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, in the
amount of 150,000 shares.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Case Number 15-11794

v. Honorable David M. Lawson

Magistrate Judge David R. Grand

NORMAN L. WILSON,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND

GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Presently before the Court is the report issued on May 31, 2016 by Magistrate Judge David

R. Grand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that the Court grant the plaintiff’s motion

for summary judgment and enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Although the magistrate judge’s

report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may object to and seek review of the

recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, no objections have been filed thus far. 

The parties’ failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to

appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). 

Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to

independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court

agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [dkt.

#15] is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment [dkt. #9] is

GRANTED.

2:15-cv-11794-DML-DRG Doc # 16 Filed 06/30/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 53
It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff shall recover of the defendant $6,751.01, plus court

costs in the amount of $400, interest from the date of filing of the complaint until the date of entry

of judgment, and post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a). The plaintiff may file a

motion for entry of judgment pursuant to this order stating a sum certain for the amount of prejudgment interest to be included in the judgment.

s/David M. Lawson 

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

Dated: June 30, 2016

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on June 30, 2016.

s/Susan Pinkowski 

SUSAN PINKOWSKI

-2-

2:15-cv-11794-DML-DRG Doc # 16 Filed 06/30/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 54
#### BARBARA ABBRUZZESE, PLAINTIFF, v. JOHN GAYNOR, CHARLES L. CANGIANO, MARCELLO ABBRUZZESE AND ALMA ABBRUZZESE, DEFENDANTS.

Decided July 29, 1929.

Before Justices Parker, Black and Bodixe.

Eor the plaintiff, *McCarthy & McTague.*

Eor the defendants Marcello Abbruzzese and Alma Abbruzzese, Heine, *Bradner & Laird.*

Eor the defendants John Gaynor and Charles L. Cangiano, *Schneider & Schneider.*

Pee Curiam.

This case arises out of an automobile accident which occurred on August 14th, 1927, on the Hudson Boulevard, in *674Jersey City, at the intersection of Newark avenue. The plaintiff was an invitee in the automobile of the defendant Alma Abbruzzese, and is hence not chargeable with contributory negligence. The jury found in her favor.

. The present rule raises the question as to whether the verdict against John Gaynor and Charles L. Cangiano, the owner and driver of the bus, was against the weight of evidence. The testimony in the case indicates that the Abbruzzese car had come to a stop by reason of the traffic signal being against it. When the traffic light changed the driver of the Abbruzzese car and another testified that he indicated to the traffic officer that he desired to make a left-hand turn and that the officer then signaled for such turn. While making this turn the Abbruzzese car was struck by the bus. There was testimony in the case that the officer gave no such signal and that the driver of the Abbruzzese car attempted to cross in front of the bus and in doing so the accident occurred. The jury might have found either way from the testimony adduced. Hence, the court cannot disturb the finding. *Boesch*v. *Kick,*97 *N. J. L.*92, 97.

The rule will be discharged.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>     5
<CIK>         0000700764
<NAME>        New Environmental Technologies

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                              82
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      82
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            23318
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          2620
<OTHER-SE>                                      (25856)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        94
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2124
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (2124)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (2124)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.00)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR NOONEY REAL PROPERTY INVESTORS-FOUR, L.P. AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000700720
<NAME> NOONEY REAL PORPERTY INVESTORS-FOUR, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                         556,014
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  114,993
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               706,165
<PP&E>                                      14,038,789
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,014,987
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,293,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          173,903
<BONDS>                                     12,548,670
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,521,665)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,293,626
<SALES>                                      2,564,418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,567,063
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,759,902
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             853,362
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (46,201)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (46,201)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2345 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2345

To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to provide for an exclusion from 
    Red Flag Guidelines for health care practices with 20 or fewer 
                               employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2009

  Mr. Adler of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. Simpson, and Mr. Broun of 
   Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to provide for an exclusion from 
    Red Flag Guidelines for health care practices with 20 or fewer 
                               employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FOR HEALTH CARE PRACTICES WITH 20 OR FEWER 
              EMPLOYEES.

    (a) In General.--Section 615(e) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act 
(15 U.S.C. 1681m(e)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(4) Exclusion for health care practices with 20 or fewer 
        employees.--For purposes of developing guidelines and 
        prescribing regulations under this subsection, the term 
        `creditor' shall not include a health care practice with 20 or 
        fewer employees.''.
    (b) Regulations.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the agencies described in section 615(e)(1) of 
the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681m(e)(1)) shall update the 
guidelines and regulations required under such section to reflect the 
amendment made by subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                            PLANET HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                                                                    Exhibit 27.1

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PLANET HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 26, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1999
<CASH>                                          14,143
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,643
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,760)
<INVENTORY>                                     13,846
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,514
<PP&E>                                         170,603
<DEPRECIATION>                                (40,964)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 234,941
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,736
<BONDS>                                          1,862
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,008
<OTHER-SE>                                   (116,053)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   234,941
<SALES>                                        272,232
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               280,969
<CGS>                                           76,564
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  475,510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,628
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (221,070)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (221,070)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (221,070)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.03)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of the
                  President and Chief Executive Officer

I, Henry R. Carabelli certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:
5. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;
6. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
7. disclosed in this report any change in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and
8. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
9. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
10. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have  a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls over financial reporting.



Date:  August 10, 2004

/s/ Henry R. Carabelli

_______________________________

Henry R. Carabelli

President and Chief Executive Officer