alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has d etermined that this opinion should not be published and is not

precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50617

(Summary Calendar)

LAVESTER ROBERSON,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR,

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL

JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. MO-96-CV-172

April 9, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Texas prisoner Lavester Roberson, #483555, appeals from the grant of summary judgment

by the district court in favor of Respondent. The di strict court granted Roberson a certi fi cate of

appealability to appeal two issues: (1) whether the State elicited testimony from a State witness about

Roberson’s voluntary post-arrest, post- Miranda statements in violation of Doyle v. Ohio

, 426 U.S.

610 (1976), and (2) whether Roberson’s state trial counsel was ineffective.

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and hold that any Doyle error was

harmless. Pitts v. Anderson , 122 F.3d 275, 279-81 (5th Cir. 1997). In the event of a Doyle error,

a petitioner is not entitled to federal habeas relief unless the error had a “ ‘substantial and injurious2

effect or influence in determining the jury’s verdict.’ ” Brecht v. Abrahamson

, 507 U.S. 619, 637-38

(1993) (quoting Kotteakos v. United States

, 328 U.S. 750, 776 (1946)). Roberson has not met the

burden of demonstrating such effect. We further hold that Roberson’s counsel was not ineffective.

Strickland v. Washington

, 466 U.S. 668, 687-94 (1984). Roberson has not introduced the requisite

clear and convincing evidence to prove that the state habeas court’s findings regarding his ineffective

assistance of counsel claim are erroneous. W illiams v. Cain

, 125 F.3d 269, 277 (5th Cir. 1997); 28

U.S.C. §2254(e)(1).

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DERRICK THOMAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF EASTPOINTE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-11443

ARTHUR J. TARNOW

SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

 /

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

On September 17, 2018, the Court received en electronic mail message from

defense counsel that the above captioned case had settled and that a stipulated order

of dismissal would be submitted. No order has yet been submitted. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without costs and

without prejudice to the right of the parties, within 30 days and upon good cause

shown, to move to vacate this order. The parties may also submit a stipulated order

of dismissal with prejudice following entry of this order.

SO ORDERED.

 s/Arthur J. Tarnow 

ARTHUR J. TARNOW

Senior United States District Judge

Dated: September 28, 2018
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

N o

. 1 2

- 4 1 1 4 3 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A

,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v

.

C O S M E R E J I N A L D O G O N Z A L E Z

, a l s o k n o w n a s L u i s , a l so k n o w n a s P a n c h o , a l s o k n o w n a s F r a n c i s c o , a l s o k n o w n a s E l G o r r o s o , a l s o k n o w n a s M i k e J o n e s ,

D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e E a s t e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o

. 4 : 0 7

- C R

- 4 2

- 9

B e f o r e K I N G

, D A V I S

, a n d E L R O D

, C i r c u i t J u d g e s

. P E R C U R I A M : *

T h e a t t o r n e y a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t C o s m e R e j i n a l d o G o n z a l e z h a s

m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v

. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

, a n d U n i t e d S t a t e s v

. F

l o r e s , 6 3 2 F

. 3 d 2 2 9 ( 5 t h

C i r

. 2 0 1 1 )

. G o n z a l e z h a s n o t f i l e d a r e s p o n s e , b u t w e h a v e r e c e i v e d h i s p r o s e

r e q u e s t f

o r a s t a y ; a s t a y i s n o t w a r r a n t e d i n t h i s c a s e

. W e h a v e r e v i e w e d U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D
J uly 31, 2013

Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* P u r su a n t t o 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 7

. 5
, t h e c o u r t h a s d e t e r m i n e d t h a t t h i s o p i n i o n sh o u l d n o t b e p u b l i sh e d and is not p r e c e d e n t e x c e p t u n d e r t h e l i m i t e d c i r c u m s t a n c e s s e t f o r t h i n 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 7

. 5

. 4

. Case: 12-41143 Document: 00512326729 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/31/2013N o

. 1 2

- 4 1 1 4 3

c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f a n d t h e r e l e v a n t p o r t i o n s o f t h e r e c o r d r e f l e c t e d t h e r e i n

. W e

concu r w i t h c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m ent t hat the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue

f o r a p p e l l a t e r e v i e w

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s
G R A N T E D

, c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e
A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C IR

. R

. 4 2

. 2

.

2 Case: 12-41143 Document: 00512326729 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/31/2013
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending March 3, 2007

----

Bank Holding CompaniesCommunity Bankshares, Inc., Greenwood Village, Colorado  -- to acquire Citizens Financial Corporation, Cortez, and The Citizens State Bank of Cortez.					-Approved, March 1, 2007 					

EnforcementBank of America Corporation, Charlotte, North Carolina  -- written agreement dated February 9, 2005, terminated February 27, 2007.					-Announced, February 27, 2007 					

Regulations And PoliciesInteragency Statement on Subprime Mortgage Lending   -- publication for comment to address safety and soundness and consumer disclosure issues related to certain adjustable-rate mortgage products marketed to subprime borrowers.					-Approved, March 2, 2007 					

Testimony And StatementsThe Aging Workforce  -- testimony by Vice Chairman Kohn before Senate Special Committee on Aging.					-Published, February 28, 2007 					Long-term Fiscal Challenges and the Economy  -- statement by Chairman Bernanke before the House Committee on the Budget.					-Published, February 28, 2007 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: March 8, 2007
#### § 4.03-45 Marine employer.

*Marine employer* means the owner, managing operator, charterer, agent, master, or person in charge of a vessel other than a recreational vessel.

[CGD 84-099, 52 FR 47534, Dec. 14, 1987]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending September 23, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
|   | 1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the Company’s financial position and results of      operations. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                  |   |                                                                                |
|---------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  |   |                                                                                |   |
| Date:  August      19, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Jon      Fullenkamp                                                        |   |
|                                  |   | Jon      Fullenkamp                                                                 |   |
|                                  |   | Principal      Executive OfficerPrincipal      Financial andAccounting      Officer |   |
|                                  |   |                                                                                |   |
**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15                (d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the Company’s financial position and results of                operations. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                          |                                        |                                 |
|-----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                                          | **Victory              Energy Corporation** |
|                                     |                                   |                            |
| Date: August              17, 2006  | By:                               | /s/ Jon              Fullenkamp |
|                                          |                                             |
|                                          | Principal              Executive Officer    |
|                                          | Principal Financial and                     |
|                                          | Accounting Officer                          |
EX-10.1






EXHIBIT 10.1




DESCRIPTION OF MICHAEL MCNEIL 2004 BONUS PLAN




The Michael McNeil 2004 Bonus Plan is designed to link Mr. McNeil’s compensation more directly
to the Company’s corporate goals and performance. Under the 2004 Bonus Plan, the compensation
committee sets (a) goals for the Company’s earnings, known as the financial goals, and (b) certain
non-quantitative strategic goals. At the end of the year, the compensation committee determines
the bonus amount for Mr. McNeil based on the Company’s attainment of the goals. Mr. McNeil is
eligible to receive up to $100,000 based on the Company’s actual earnings relative to the financial
goals and up to $25,000 for the satisfaction of the non-quantitative strategic goals. The
compensation committee may adjust the earnings goals at the end of the year to address the
“quality” of the earnings and other environmental factors that may have contributed positively or
negatively to the Company’s actual earnings.
#### Henry E. Sprague, *Respondent, v.*Edwin Butterworth and others, Appellants.

Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
Order entered November 26, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00958-CV

LAKEITH AMIR-SHARIF, Appellant

V.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY & PROTECTIVE SERVICES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-09-7655

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 21, 2014 objection to panel members. 

Appellant’s motion is DENIED as moot.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-50703

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Troy Webb, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7-20-CR-65-1

Before Wiener, Southwick, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Defendant-Appellant Troy Webb was convicted after a bench trial of 

being a felon in possession of a firearm and was sentenced to 70 months in 

prison and three years of supervised release. On appeal, Webb contends that 

the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction. We focus on whether 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 7, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-50703 Document: 00515811620 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/07/2021
No. 20-50703

2

substantial evidence supports the district court’s conclusion that the 

defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, viewing the evidence in the 

light most favorable to the Government and deferring to the district court’s 

reasonable inferences. United States v. Tovar, 719 F.3d 376, 388 (5th Cir. 

2013). 

To obtain a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), the Government 

must prove that (1) the defendant previously had been convicted of a felony, 

(2) the defendant knowingly possessed a firearm, (3) the firearm traveled in 

or affected interstate commerce, and (4) the defendant knew his status as a 

felon when he possessed the firearm. United States v. Ortiz, 927 F.3d 868, 

874 (5th Cir. 2019); United States v. Guidry, 406 F.3d 314, 318 (5th Cir. 

2005); see also United States v. Huntsberry, 956 F.3d 270, 281 (5th Cir. 2020). 

Webb contests only whether there was sufficient evidence that he knowingly 

possessed a firearm. Webb does not contest his admission that he threw a

bag with a shotgun out of a vehicle during a high speed chase and that he knew 

the bag contained a firearm. Webb’s admission that he knowingly threw the 

bag containing the shotgun from the vehicle, which was corroborated by the 

arresting officer’s testimony, is substantial evidence that he possessed the 

firearm. See United States v. De Leon, 170 F.3d 494, 496 (5th Cir. 1999);

United States v. Munoz, 150 F.3d 401, 416 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. 

Mergerson, 4 F.3d 337, 348 (5th Cir. 1993). The evidence was sufficient to 

justify the district court’s conclusion that Webb was guilty beyond a 

reasonable doubt of possession of the firearm. See Tovar, 719 F.3d at 388. 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 20-50703 Document: 00515811620 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/07/2021
#### The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, *Appellant,*v. The Board of Supervisors of Delaware County, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Special Term.
§ 42.03-15 The Great Lakes of North America. ( a ) The term “Great Lakes of North America” means those waters of North America which are defined in § 42.05-40, and in the exception in Article 5(2)(a) of the 1966 Convention.
( b ) The expressions in the regulations in this part, such as “voyages by sea,” “proceed to sea,” “arrive from the high seas,” etc., shall be construed as having no application to voyages on the Great Lakes or portions thereof unless specifically provided otherwise in part 45 of this subchapter.
[CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10050, July 12, 1968]
##### 



Exhibit 10.52(6)
 
  
 Re:
    
    Waiver and Second Amendment/ to Loan AgreementDover Saddlery, Inc. Financing Arrangements
     Amendment




---



##### 



Waiver
    Very truly yours,
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
(successor by merger to Fleet National Bank)By:
    /s/ John F. LynchTitle:  Senior Vice President ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:DOVER SADDLERY, INC.(a Massachusetts corporation)By:
    
    /s/ Stephen L. DayTitle: President and CEO
 -2-




---



##### 



CONSENT OF GUARANTORS
  DOVER SADDLERY, INC.By:
    /s/ Stephen L. DayTitle:  President and CEO SMITH BROTHERS, INC.By:
    /s/ Stephen L. DayTitle:  Director -3-
|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the      requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Corporation’s financial position and results      of operations. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |   |                                                                                |
|-------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          |   |                                                                                |   |
| Date:  November 12, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Jon      Fullenkamp                                                        |   |
|                          |   | Jon    Fullenkamp                                                                   |   |
|                          |   | Principal Executive      OfficerPrincipal Financial      andAccounting      Officer |   |
|                          |   |                                                                                |   |
#### § 26.03-10 Signaling light.

All vessels of over 150 gross tons, when engaged on an international voyage, shall be equipped with an efficient daylight signaling lamp in accordance with the requirements of subchapter J (Electrical Engineering) of this chapter.

[CGFR 68-32, 33 FR 5711, Apr. 12, 1968, as amended by CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51042, Sept. 30, 1997]
§ 31.10-50 Inspection of bilges—TB/ALL. ( a ) When inspecting oil-burning vessels, either internal-combustion type or steam-driven type, the marine inspector shall examine the tank tops and bilges in the fireroom and engineroom to see that there is no accumulation of oil which might create a fire hazard.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998             JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998             JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                     153,728,200              40,776,258
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,166,470               7,188,262
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,208,000                 554,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           200,796,790              60,744,744
<PP&E>                                       6,596,831               3,524,776
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,636,772               1,127,176
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             248,758,257              65,419,009
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       53,875,241              22,615,315
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       389,916                 275,932
<OTHER-SE>                                 168,296,679              37,371,095
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               248,758,257              65,419,009
<SALES>                                     56,060,305              22,273,042
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            56,060,305              22,273,042
<CGS>                                       12,513,259               4,335,941
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              156,028,615              31,022,704
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (96,916,563)             (6,619,190)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (96,916,563)             (6,619,190)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (96,916,563)             (6,619,190)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.13)                   (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.13)                   (.24)
        

</TABLE>