alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

EFREM WALKER, Individually,

Plaintiff,

vs.

OAKLAND POINTE PARTNERS, LLC,

a Michigan Limited Liability Company,

Defendant.

_______________________________________/

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 2:14-cv-13358-PJD-MJH

M. J. STEPHEN FOX

FOX & ASSOCIATES

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff

2529 Chatham Woods Drive SE

Grand Rapids, MI 49546

(616) 293-3955

LAWRENCE A. FULLER

FULLER, FULLER & ASSOCIATES, P.A.

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff

12000 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 502

North Miami, FL 33181

(305) 891-5199

____________________________________

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

COMES NOW Plaintiff, EFREM WALKER, by and through his undersigned counsel, 

and herein files this Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to Defendant OAKLAND POINTE 

PARTNERS, LLC, a Michigan Limited Liability Company, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41 (a) 1 (A)(i).

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: October 17, 2014 /s/ Lawrence A. Fuller

Lawrence A. Fuller, Esq.

Member, Eastern District of Michigan

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff

FULLER, FULLER & ASSOCIATES, P.A.

12000 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 502

North Miami, FL 33181

(305) 891-5199

(305) 893-9505 - Facsimile

lfuller@fullerfuller.com

Case 2:14-cv-13358-PJD-MJH ECF No. 3 filed 10/17/14 PageID.12 Page 1 of 2
and

FOX & ASSOCIATES

M. J. Stephen Fox, Esq. (P32456)

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff

2529 Chatham Woods Drive SE

Grand Rapids, MI 49546

(616) 293-3955

(616) 676-5900 - Facsimile

foxlawfirm@aol.com

Case 2:14-cv-13358-PJD-MJH ECF No. 3 filed 10/17/14 PageID.13 Page 2 of 2
NO. 07-04-0545-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	APRIL 5, 2005

	______________________________

	ANGELITA E. ORTIZ, Individually and as Representative of the

	Estate of JOSE FABIAN ORTIZ, Deceased, and as Next Friend

	of RONNIE JAY ORTIZ and JOSE FABIAN ORTIZ, JR., Minors,

	and ZOILA P. ORTIZ and STEPHANIE ORTIZ as Next Kin of

	JOSE FABIAN ORTIZ, DECEASED,

											Appellants

	V.

	SERVICE GIN, INC.,

											Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 242nd DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY;

	NO. B-33181-0313; HON. ED SELF, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	On Motion to Dismiss

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	Angelita E. Ortiz, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Jose Fabian Ortiz, Deceased, and as Next Friend of Ronnie Jay Ortiz and Jose Fabian Ortiz, Jr., Minors, and Zoila P. Ortiz and Stephanie Ortiz as Next Kin of Jose Fabian Ortiz, Deceased, appellants, and Service Gin, Inc., appellee, by and through their attorneys, have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal because the parties have fully compromised and settled all issues in dispute and neither desire to pursue the appeal.  Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2) and dismiss the appeal.  Having dismissed the appeal at appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.  		 					

							Brian Quinn

							   Justice
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DARLENE LEWIS,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 15-10963

v.

HONORABLE AVERN COHN

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 23)

AND

GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 20)

AND DISMISSING CASE

This is a social security case. Plaintiff Darlene Lewis (Lewis) appeals from the

final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) that she is

not disabled and therefore not entitled to disability insurance benefits. The matter was

referred to a magistrate judge for all pretrial proceedings. See Doc. 2. The

Commissioner filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 20) The magistrate judge

issued a report and recommendation (MJRR) recommending that the Commissioner’s

motion be granted and the case dismissed. (Doc. 23)1

1

As the magistrate judge noted, Lewis was initially represented by counsel when

the complaint was filed. However, her counsel was subsequently terminated from this

and other Social Security cases for malfeasance. Lewis then became pro se and was

invited to file a motion for summary judgment; she did not. Lewis also did not file a

response to the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment. Due to conflicting

authority for dismissing a Social Security case where a pro se plaintiff does not respond

to a motion for summary judgment, the magistrate judge wisely conducted an

independent review of the record and determined that substantial evidence supports the

2:15-cv-10963-AC-EAS Doc # 24 Filed 03/07/17 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 638
Neither party has filed objections to the MJRR and the time for filing objections

has passed. The failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any

further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d

1370, 1373 (6th Cir.1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's

report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the motions. Thomas v.

Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). 

Accordingly, the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED

as the findings and conclusions of the Court. The Commissioner’s motion for summary

judgment is GRANTED. This case is DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

S/Avern Cohn 

 AVERN COHN

Dated: March 7, 2017 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 Detroit, Michigan

Commissioner’s decision denying benefits. 

2

2:15-cv-10963-AC-EAS Doc # 24 Filed 03/07/17 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 639
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending December 29, 2007

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2013-0480

Docket Number

2012-SW-090-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. AS365-25.01.18, ASB No. EC155-

25A114, ASB No. AS332-25.02.49, ASB No. EC225-25A110, all Revision 1 and 

all dated August 9, 2012.

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2320 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2320

 To authorize the Secretary of the Army to retain funds collected from 
   recreation fees at Lake Texoma to repair flood-damaged recreation 
                              facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2009

  Mr. Boren introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Secretary of the Army to retain funds collected from 
   recreation fees at Lake Texoma to repair flood-damaged recreation 
                              facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISPOSITION OF RECREATION FEES AT LAKE TEXOMA.

    (a) In General.--Funds generated by fees collected during fiscal 
years 2010 through 2015 for entering or being admitted to public 
recreation areas at Denison Dam, Lake Texoma, Texas and Oklahoma, or 
for using recreation facilities located in such areas, shall be 
retained by the Secretary of the Army and shall be used to cover the 
cost of repairing damages to any federally owned recreation structure, 
facility, or real property managed by the Secretary at Lake Texoma that 
was damaged as a result of flooding that occurred at the Lake prior to 
September 30, 2007.
    (b) Funds Available to Secretary.--The funds referred to in 
subsection (a) shall be deposited into a special account established in 
the Treasury of the United States and shall be available to the 
Secretary of the Army without further appropriation for use by the 
Secretary as specified in subsection (a), except that any funds that 
remain available after September 30, 2021, shall be deposited into the 
special account established in the Treasury under section 4(i)(1) of 
the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

, Respondent

v. KARL BROWN, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 596 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 20th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7015

In Re: BOBBY RAY BROWN,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-92-679-2)

Submitted: November 18, 1999 Decided: December 3, 1999

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bobby Ray Brown, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Bobby Ray Brown petitions this court to issue a writ of mandamus ordering the district court and the Attorney General of North

Carolina to give Brown a copy of a sealed exhibit from a petition

for habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999),

ruled on by the district court in 1994.

The record of Brown's state court conviction, including the

exhibit in question, was not retained in the district court, but

was returned to the state attorney general. Federal courts do not

have general power to compel action by state officials, Davis v.

Lansing, 851 F.2d 72, 74 (4th Cir. 1988), or by private individuals

such as Brown's prior counsel, whom he asserts also has a copy of

the exhibit. See 28 U.S.C. § 1361 (1994). Therefore, we are unable to grant Brown the relief he seeks, and we deny his petition

for a writ of mandamus. We deny his motion to proceed in forma

pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and oral argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Civil No. 2:15-cv-12124

Plaintiff,

Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

vs.

MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIBLE 

COINS AND MEDALS SEIZED IN 

JANUARY 2012 FROM REAL PROPERTY 

LOCATED ON LAKESHORE STREET, 

WEST BLOOMFIELD, MICHIGAN, et al. 

Defendants In Rem.

_____________________________________/

GOVERNMENT’S STATUS REPORT

The Government submits this status report pursuant to the February 8, 2016

Stipulation for Entry of Order Administratively Closing Civil Forfeiture 

Proceedings. 

The Court administratively closed the above-captioned civil forfeiture case 

(the “Case”) due to an underlying criminal investigation. (Dkt. # 47). The parties 

to the Case agreed that the Case would be administratively closed on the grounds 

that continuation of the civil proceeding may negatively impact one or all parties, 

and that the Case would remain administratively closed pending completion of the 

criminal proceeding, or upon further order of the Court.

1:15-cv-12124-TLL-PTM Doc # 50 Filed 08/08/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 251
2

Claimant Gavin Awerbuch is currently scheduled for a preliminary 

examination on August 12, 2016 (14-mj-30216), however, it is anticipated the 

government and defense will seek an additional adjournment of the preliminary 

exam date. The parties have agreed to attempt to globally resolve the outstanding 

forfeiture issues in the criminal case. Therefore, the Government requests that this

Case remain administratively closed. The Government has been advised by 

opposing counsel, Mark Kriger, Esq. and Jorin Rubin, Esq., that the claimants do

not oppose continuing the stay of the Case.

Respectfully submitted,

BARBARA L. McQUADE

United States Attorney

S/PHILIP A. ROSS

Assistant United States Attorney

211 W. Fort Street, Suite 2001

Detroit, Michigan 48226

(313) 226-9790

philip.ross@usdoj.gov

Dated: August 8, 2016 (VA State Bar #70269)

1:15-cv-12124-TLL-PTM Doc # 50 Filed 08/08/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 252
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26392]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2274]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Personalized 
Healthcare Workgroup Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the sixth meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Personalized Healthcare Workgroup in accordance 
with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., 
App.)

DATES: June 7, 2007, from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. [Eastern Daylight Time].

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 4090 (please bring photo ID for entry to a 
Federal building).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/
healthcare/

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Workgroup will discuss possible common 
data standards to incorporate interoperable, clinically useful genetic 
laboratory test data, family history information, and analytical tools 
into Electronic Health Records (EHR) to support clinical decision-
making for the health care provider and patient.
    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional 
information, go to: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/healthcare/phc_instruct.html.

    Dated: April 31, 2007.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordination for Health 
Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 07-2274 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Fibersat Networking Services ) ASBCA No. 62991

)

Under Contract No. W91B4N-18-P-5013 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. Obaidullah Karimy

 Chief Financial Officer

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Scott N. Flesch, Esq.

 Army Chief Trial Attorney

MAJ Michael R. Tregle, Jr., JA

 Trial Attorney

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: November 21, 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62991, Appeal of Fibersat 

Networking Services, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: November 21, 2022

BRIAN S. SMITH

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
2:15-mc-50750-AJT-APP Doc # 6 Filed 05/20/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 39
2:15-mc-50750-AJT-APP Doc # 6 Filed 05/20/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 40
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

ORDER OF TEMPORARY DETENTION

 PENDING HEARING PURSUANT TO

 V. BAIL REFORM ACT

 HATEM ATAYA

 CASE NUMBER: 15-20351

Defendant

Upon motion of the GOVERNMENT , it is ORDERED that a 

detention hearing is set for June 22, 2015 * at 1:00 p.m. 

Date

before THE DUTY MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Name of Judicial Officer

 

Location of Judicial Officer

Pending this hearing, the defendant shall be held in custody by (the United States Marshal)

 ( ) and produced for the hearing.

Other Custodial Official

Date: June 19, 2015 s/David R. Grand 

 Judicial Officer

 MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID R. GRAND

 

*If not held immediately upon defendant’s first appearance, the hearing may be continued for up to three days upon motion of

the Government or 5 days upon motion of the defendant. 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(2).

A hearing is required whenever the conditions set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f) are present. Subsection (1) sets forth the

grounds that may be asserted by the attorney for the Government; subsection (2) states that a hearing is mandated upon the motion

of the attorney for the Government or upon the judicial officer’s own motion, if there is a serious risk that the defendant will flee

or will obstruct or attempt to obstruct justice, or threaten, injure, or intimidate or attempt to threaten, injure, or intimidate a

prospective witness or juror.

2:15-cr-20351-SFC-MKM Doc # 45 Filed 06/19/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 98
#### Catharine Ann Hedges, Appellant, *v.*Henry D. Goetschius and Eugene H. Goetschius, *Respondents*.

Judgment of County Court affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                     Exhibit 11

             AIR EXPRESS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)

(In thousands, except
  per share amounts)

                                                            Three Months Ended
                                                                  March 31,     
                                                             1998         1997  
<S>                                                          <C>        <C>    
    Net income applicable to
      common shares ................................         $ 9,730    $ 8,539

    Earnings per share:
      Basic ........................................         $   .28    $   .25
      Diluted ......................................         $   .28    $   .25

    Common share and common
     share equivalents:

    Weighted average of common
     shares outstanding ...........................          34,639      34,184

      Basic shares ................................          34,639      34,184
      Common share equivalents ....................             742         699
      Diluted equivalent shares ...................          35,381      34,883
<FN>



     Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted
     average common shares outstanding  during the period.  Diluted earnings per
     share is computed by dividing  net income by the  weighted  average of both
     the common  shares  and common  share  equivalents  outstanding  during the
     period.
</FN>
</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending September 29, 2007

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0043

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

CORY ANN RUCKER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Kim Marchwick is 

granted an extension of time to and including May 11, 2022, within 

which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. 

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 5 2022

05/05/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0043
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Thrift Supervision

          - [AC-12: OTS  Nos. 01538 and H-4393] 

                    Notice is hereby given that on May 14, 2007, the Managing Director, Examinations and Supervision—Operations, Office of Thrift Supervision, acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the application of Bank of New Orleans, Metairie, Louisiana, to convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application are available for inspection by appointment (phone number: 202-906-5922 or e-mail:                     *Public.Infor@OTS.Treas.gov*) at the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, and the OTS Midwest Regional Office, 225 E. John Carpenter Freeway, Suite 500, Irving, Texas 75062-2326.                

Dated: May 15, 2007.

By the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Sandra E. Evans, 

Legal Information Assistant.

[FR Doc. 07-2475  Filed 5-17-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6720-01-M