alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 32.50-3 Cargo discharge—TB/ALL. ( a ) Pumps or other acceptable means shall be used to discharge cargo from gravity type cargo tanks vented at gauge pressures of 4 pounds per square inch or less.
( b ) The use of compressed air as the primary means of discharging cargo from such tanks is prohibited.
§ 190.10-25 Stairway size. ( a ) Stairways shall be of sufficient width having in mind the number of persons having access to such stairs for escape purposes.
( b ) All interior stairways, other than those within the machinery spaces, shall have minimum width of 28 inches. The angle of inclination with the horizontal of such stairways shall not exceed 50°.
( c ) Special consideration for relief may be given if it is shown to be unreasonable or impracticable to meet the requirements in this section.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Parole Commission 

          - [(Public Law 94-409) (5 U.S.C. 552b)] 

I, Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Chairman of the United States Parole Commission, was present at a meeting of said Commission, which started at approximately 1:30 p.m., on Thursday, April 26, 2007, at the U.S. Parole Commission, 5550 Friendship Boulevard, 4th Floor, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815. The purpose of the meeting was to decide four petitions for reconsideration pursuant to 28 CFR 2.27. Five Commissioners were present, constituting a quorum when the vote to close the meeting was submitted. 

                    Public announcement further describing the subject matter of the meeting and certifications of General Counsel that this meeting may be closed by vote of the Commissioners present were submitted to the Commissioners prior to the conduct of any other business. Upon motion duly made, seconded, and carried, the following Commissioners voted that the meeting be closed: Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Cranston J. Mitchell, Deborah A.                           ( print page 27152)                        Spagnoli, Isaac Fulwood, Jr., and Patricia Cushwa.                 

*In witness whereof*, I make this official record of the vote taken to close this meeting and authorize this record to be made available to the public.                 

Dated: April 27, 2007. 

Edward F. Reilly, Jr., 

Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission. 

[FR Doc. 07-2379 Filed 5-9-07; 4:24 pm] 

BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6902

BENJAMIN L. STITH,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

R. YOUNCE, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (7:23-cv-00140-JPJ-PMS)

Submitted: December 19, 2023 Decided: December 27, 2023

Before HARRIS, QUATTLEBAUM, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin L. Stith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6902 Doc: 8 Filed: 12/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin Stith seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his

28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. See Gonzalez v. Thaler, 564 U.S. 134, 148 & n.9 (2012) 

(explaining that § 2254 petitions are subject to one-year statute of limitations, running from 

latest of four commencement dates enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)). The order is 

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, 

the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both 

that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 

(2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Stith has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6902 Doc: 8 Filed: 12/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 162
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 162.161-9 Procedure for approval. ( a ) Preapproval review is required as detailed in 46 CFR 159.005-5 and 159.005-7.
( b ) Applications for approval must be submitted in accordance with 46 CFR 159.005-9 through 159.005-12 to the Commandant (CG-5214). In addition to the listed requirements: ( 1 ) Evidence must be shown that an acceptable follow-up factory inspection program is in place in each factory location. This could be demonstrated by providing an original copy of the contract for a follow-up program between the manufacturer and the independent laboratory. The follow-up program must include provisions that prohibit changes to the approved equipment without review and approval by the independent laboratory.
( 2 ) Two design, installation, operation and maintenance manuals must be submitted.
#### § 308.546 Standard optional endorsement No. 1-A, Form MA-316-A.

Standard Optional Endorsement No. 1-A limits the amount payable for the loss of goods to the actual bona fide pecuniary loss to the Assured, exclusive of any allowance for anticipated or accrued profit arising out of the insured venture. (Similar provisions for Open Cargo Policies are contained in Standard Optional Endorsement No. 1, Form MA-300-A, prescribed in § 308.518.) Application for Standard Optional Endorsement No. 1-A shall be made to the Underwriting Agent at the time application is made for the policy. The Underwriting Agent is authorized to issue the endorsement without prior approval of the Maritime Administrator. This form may be obtained from MARAD's underwriting agent or MARAD.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 85 (Thursday, May 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 24571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2176]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on National Guard and 
Reserves in the GWOT will meet in closed session on May 15-16, 2007; at 
the Strategic Analysis Inc., 3601 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these 
meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will: assess the 
consequences for force structure, morale, and mission capability of 
deployments of members of the National Guard and the Reserves in the 
course of the global war on terrorism that are lengthy, frequent, or 
both.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended ( 5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been 
determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, the 
meetings will be closed to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LCDR Clifton Phillips, USN, Defense 
Science Board, 3140 Defense Pentagon, Room 3C553, Washington, DC 20301-
3140, via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c0a3aca9a6b4afaeeeb0a8a9acaca9b0b380afb3a4eeada9ac"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="debdb2b7b8aab1b0f0aeb6b7b2b2b7aead9eb1adbaf0b3b7b2">[email protected]</span></a>, or via phone at (703) 
571-0083.

    Dated: April 27, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-2176 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 35.05-25 Illness, alcohol, drugs—TB/ALL. ( a ) No person, known by the individual in charge of a tank vessel to be under the influence of liquor or other stimulant, or to be ill to such an extent as to unfit him for any particular service on the tank vessel, shall be allowed to perform such service while in such condition.
( b ) When a member of the crew of a tank vessel which is loading bulk cargo of Grade A, B, or C arrives at the gangway and is observed to be in an intoxicated condition, he shall not be permitted to board the vessel without escort.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cr-20780 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

CURTIS SCOTT, 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________/

ORDER CONCERNING REQUEST FOR DOCKET FILINGS (ECF #361) 

 Defendant Curtis Scott is representing himself in this action. The Court has 

appointed Richard Korn as stand-by counsel for Mr. Scott. (See ECF ## 181, 184.) 

On April 18, 2018, Mr. Scott filed a request to “be allowed to get [a]ccess to [m]y 

[d]ocket filings . . . .” (ECF #361.) 

The most efficient way for Mr. Scott to obtain filings on this docket is through 

his stand-by counsel, Mr. Korn. Therefore, the Court directs Mr. Scott to make any 

requests for docket filings to Mr. Korn. The Court authorizes and directs Mr. Korn 

to provide Mr. Scott with the copies of the docket filings that he requests. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: April 19, 2018 
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on April 19, 2018, by electronic means and/or ordinary 

mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (810) 341-9764
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Collins, Appellee.

[Cite as *State v. Collins*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 11.]

(No. 97-2320

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided November 25, 1998.)

*R. Larry Schneider,*Union County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Rick Rodger,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St 3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

The cause is remanded to the trial court to conduct a sexual predator classification hearing pursuant to R.C. 2950.09(C)(2).

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED IN THE  COMPANY'S  FORM 10-K FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                       1
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      10,894,375
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,782,431
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (252,305)
<INVENTORY>                                    418,870
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,016,782
<PP&E>                                         888,952
<DEPRECIATION>                               (132,365)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,580,346
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,490,691
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,658
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,864,018
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,580,346
<SALES>                                      5,319,080
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,319,080
<CGS>                                        2,025,619
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,755,297
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (518,965)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,812,625)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,812,625)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,812,625)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.85)
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 287

#### Editorial Note:

The regulations contained in this part were codified by the Internal Revenue Service in Treasury Decision 6820, 30 FR 6030, Apr. 29, 1965. For text see also 26 CFR part 2.

#### § 287.28 Administrative jurisdiction.

Sections 287.3 to 287.11, inclusive, §§ 287.13 to 187.15, inclusive, and §§ 287.19 to 287.22, inclusive, deal primarily with matters under the jurisdiction of the Administration. Sections 287.12, 287.16 to 287.18, inclusive, and §§ 287.23 to 287.27, inclusive, deal primarily with matters under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Generally, matters relating to the establishment, maintenance, expenditure, and use of construction reserve funds and the construction, reconstruction, reconditioning, or acquisition of new vessels are under the jurisdiction of the Administration; and matters relating to the determination, assessment, and collection of taxes are under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Correspondence should be addressed to the particular authority having jurisdiction in the matter.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 240 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the alternative 

minimum tax on individuals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2009 

Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the alternative minimum tax on individuals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Individual AMT Repeal 

5 Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INDIVIDUAL ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM 

7 TAX. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 55(a) of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 (relating to alternative minimum tax 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 240 IH

1 imposed) is amended by adding at the end the following 

2 new flush sentence: 

3 ‘‘Except in the case of a corporation, no tax shall be im4 posed by this section for any taxable year beginning after 

5 December 31, 2008, and the tentative minimum tax of any 

6 taxpayer other than a corporation for any such taxable 

7 year shall be zero for purposes of this title.’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

10 December 31, 2008. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2498 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 92
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2498

                          [Report No. 111-213]

 To designate the Federal building located at 844 North Rush Street in 
  Chicago, Illinois, as the ``William O. Lipinski Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2009

 Mr. Oberstar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                             July 20, 2009

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the Federal building located at 844 North Rush Street in 
  Chicago, Illinois, as the ``William O. Lipinski Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 844 North Rush Street in Chicago, 
Illinois, shall be known and designated as the ``William O. Lipinski 
Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William O. 
Lipinski Federal Building''.
                                                  House Calendar No. 92

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2498

                          [Report No. 111-213]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the Federal building located at 844 North Rush Street in 
  Chicago, Illinois, as the ``William O. Lipinski Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 20, 2009

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 15-20382

Plaintiff,

v Hon. Victoria A. Roberts

PAUL NICOLETTI,

Defendant.

_____________________________

STIPULATION

It is hereby agreed between the parties that the time for Defendant to file

motions be extended two weeks, due to ongoing discussions between counsel for the

parties regarding potential resolution of discovery and trial issues which might

otherwise be the subject of motions.

s/AUSA Craig Weier s/John Minock

Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant

ORDER

The Court having reviewed the above stipulation, 

IT IS ORDERED that the motion cutoff date for Defendant is extended two

weeks, from July 22, 2016 to August 5, 2016.

Dated: 7/25/2016 S/Victoria A. Roberts

Hon. Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM Doc # 25 Filed 07/25/16 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 72
#### Joseph Thorn *v.*D. McShaw.

Judgment and order- affirmed.

Opinion

*Per Curiam.*
Exhibit
10.2





 


2005 – 2006 STRATEGIC INCENTIVE
PLAN (SIP)


TERMS AND CONDITIONS


 


	
  Purpose

  	
   

  	
  Reward achievement of
  two year goals

   

  
	
  Eligibility

  	
   

  	
  Key managers and above
  identified on an individual basis.

   

  
	
  Performance Period

  	
   

  	
  Two- year overlapping
  performance periods are used.

   

  
	
  Performance

  Measures

  	
   

  	
  Funding to be based on
  performance versus the following measures:

  •             60%
  overall Brunswick financial goals weighted 50% Corporate Brunswick Value
  Added (BVA) and 50% Earnings per Share (EPS). BVA defined as profits after-tax;
  reduced for cost of capital charge (capital to include working, fixed and
  other assets; cost of capital will include debt and equity) 

  •             40%
  performance against Strategic Factors.

  •             For
  Division employees based on Division’s strategic factor performance 

  •             For
  headquarters employees based on average of all Division results 

  •             Factors
  include:

  •             Customer
  satisfaction

  •             Growth
  in market share 

  •             Product
  innovation (percent of sales from new products)

  •             Employee
  satisfaction

   

  
	
  Funding Review and

  Approval

  	
   

  	
  The following steps
  will be taken to review and approve funding:

   

  •             CFO
  will review actual results quarterly to evaluate established accruals.

  •             CEO
  will review performance at end of performance period and approve funding or
  recommend funding to Human Resource and Compensation Committee as
  appropriate.

  •             Committee
  will review and approve funding as deemed appropriate.

   

  
	
  Individual Awards

  	
   

  	
  Individual awards will
  be determined on a discretionary basis using overall Brunswick performance,
  evaluation of individual performance for the performance period, target
  incentives as a percent of salary and covered salary (actual paid for final
  year of performance period).

   

  Individuals must be
  employed at end of performance period to receive an award, except those terminating
  due to death or permanent and total disability will be eligible to receive
  individual awards.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Timing of Award

  Payments

  	
   

  	
  As soon as practical
  after financial results are confirmed and appropriate approvals obtained.

  



 


Nothing contained in these materials constitutes or is intended to
create a promise of an individual incentive award or a contract of continued
employment.  Employment is at-will and
may be terminated by either the employee or Corporation for any reason at any
time.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1419

To provide an exemption with respect to gambling devices on certain vessels

making voyages on Lake Michigan.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 5, 1995

Mr. VISCLOSKY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To provide an exemption with respect to gambling devices

on certain vessels making voyages on Lake Michigan.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, for purposes of section 5(b)(1)(A) of the Act of Jan4 uary 2, 1951 (15 U.S.C. 1175(b)(1)(A)), commonly

5 known as the ‘‘Johnson Act’’, a vessel on a voyage that

6 originates in the territorial jurisdiction of the State of In7 diana and that does not leave Lake Michigan shall be con8 sidered to be a vessel that is not within the boundaries

9 of any State or possession of the United States.

Æ