alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Great Outdoors Month, 2007

During Great Outdoors Month, we celebrate the rich blessings of our Nation's natural beauty, and we renew our commitment to protecting our environment so that we can leave our children and grandchildren a healthy and flourishing land. This month is also an opportunity to pay tribute to those whose hard work and dedication keep our country's open spaces beautiful and accessible to our citizens. 

Through recreational activities such as fishing, skiing, biking, and nature watching, we can teach our young people about the wonders of our Nation's landscapes. Experiencing our Nation's natural splendor contributes to healthier lives for our citizens and a deeper appreciation for the great outdoors. 

My Administration is working to protect and conserve our natural wonders for future generations. To keep our National Park System vibrant, we requested the highest increase ever in park operations funding in the FY 2008 Budget and launched the National Parks Centennial Initiative. We are also promoting responsible stewardship and conservation of our air, water, and land. Harmful air pollutants are down more than 10 percent since 2001, but there is more work to be done. Through the “Twenty in Ten” plan, my Administration aims to limit greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles and reduce America's dependence on oil by cutting our gasoline usage by 20 percent over the next 10 years. 

In addition, we have restored, improved, or protected millions of acres of wetlands and enhanced our parks and wildlife refuges. We are also encouraging cooperative conservation, innovation, and new technologies to help ensure America's outdoors remain places where families and friends can learn, exercise, and create meaningful memories. 

Countless citizens volunteer their time and talents to protect America's natural resources. By working together with the private and non-profit sectors and the general public, we can help preserve our local parks, lakes, rivers, and working lands. I am grateful for the efforts of all those who work to conserve our Nation's natural wonders, and I encourage citizens to visit takepride.gov to learn about more opportunities to help keep our environment healthy and safe. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim June 2007 as Great Outdoors Month. I call on all Americans to observe this month with appropriate programs and activities and to take time to experience and enjoy the outdoors. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-fifth day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 07-2716

Billing code 3195-01-P
#### In the Matter of the Application of the New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company for Appointment of Commissioners to Appraise Certain Lands of Fannie P. Cottle, and others.

Order of the Special Term affirmed, without costs to either party. Opinion by

Macomber, J.;

Hardin, J., not acting.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                    Letter of Arthur Andersen Representation

To the Securities and Exchange Commission:

     We received a letter from Arthur Andersen LLP, dated March 29, 2002,
representing that the audit as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001, was
subject to their quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing
practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in
compliance with professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of
Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audit and availability of national
consultation, and availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur
Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

Very truly yours,

/s/ PAUL D. MEYER

Paul meyer
Chief Financial Officer

Camarillo, California
March 29, 2002
Unassociated Document


 



APPENDIX A TO


MULTIPLE CLASS PLAN


OF CNI CHARTER FUNDS







MULTIPLE CLASS FUNDS







Government Money Market Fund (Servicing Class, Class N and Class S)


Prime Money Market Fund (Institutional Class, Servicing Class, Class N and Class S)


California Tax–Exempt Money Market Fund (Servicing Class, Class N and Class S)


Limited Maturity Fixed Income Fund (Institutional Class and Class N)


Government Bond Fund (Institutional Class, Servicing Class and Class N)


Corporate Bond Fund (Servicing Class and Class N)


California Tax Exempt Bond Fund (Servicing Class and Class N)


Full Maturity Fixed Income Fund (Institutional Class and Class N)


Intermediate Fixed Income Fund (Institutional Class and Class N)


High Yield Bond Fund (Institutional Class, Servicing Class and Class N)


Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (Class N)


Multi-Asset Fund (Institutional Class, Servicing Class and Class N)


Dividend & Income Fund (Class N)


U.S. Core Equity Fund (Institutional Class, Servicing Class and Class N)


Diversified Equity Fund (Institutional Class and Class N)


Large Cap Value Equity Fund (Institutional Class, Servicing Class and Class N)


Large Cap Growth Equity Fund (Servicing Class and Class N)


Socially Responsible Equity Fund (Institutional Class and Class N)


Emerging Markets Fund (Class N)


 


Dated:  September 17, 2013
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RODNEY CHAVERS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 02 3

- 2608

[ February 22, 2024 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.8 5 0 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fif t eenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach C ounty ; Scott Suskauer

, Judge;

L.T. Case No. 5020 1 5 CF 012000

.

Rodney Chavers

, Pahokee

, pro se

.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, G ERBER and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.137-4 Approval procedures. ( a ) Manufacturers that desire type approval should submit a written notice to the Commandant (CG-ENG-4) describing the product and its intended uses. The Commandant will evaluate this information and notify the manufacturer of the product's suitability for testing. The manufacturer should then contract directly with an accepted independent laboratory to perform the required tests and inspections.
( b ) Upon completion of the required testing and inspections, the manufacturer must submit either a written request for type approval to the Commandant (CG-ENG-4), United States Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, or electronically submit a request to *typeapproval@uscg.mil .* The request must indicate the name and address of the manufacturer, all product designations, and the address of all manufacturing facilities. The request must include a copy of the final fire test report and the production inspection procedures. From the information submitted, the Commandant determines whether or not the product is acceptable for type approval. If the product is determined to be acceptable, a type approval certificate valid for a 5-year period will be issued. If the product is not accepted, the manufacturer will be notified of the reasons why.
§ 54.01-25 Miscellaneous pressure components (modifies UG-11). ( a ) Pressure components for pressure vessels must be as required by UG-11 of Section VIII of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 54.01-1) except as noted otherwise in this section.
( b ) All pressure components conforming to an accepted ANSI (American National Standards Institute) Standard referred to in an adopted code, specification or standard or in this subchapter must also be marked in accordance with MSS SP-25 (incorporated by reference; see § 54.01-1).
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18828, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGFR 69-127, 35 FR 9977, June 17, 1970; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65167, Oct. 31, 2008]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           8,383
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,200
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     64,349
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          10,874
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            10,202
<LOANS>                                        121,212
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,951
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 217,891
<DEPOSITS>                                     192,395
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,506
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,044
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,946
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 217,891
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,547
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,493
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   283
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,323
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,786
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,869
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,454
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      100
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   4
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,240
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,670
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,768
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,768
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .88
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.58
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,716
<LOANS-PAST>                                       347
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   428
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    605
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,142
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      573
<RECOVERIES>                                       282
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,951
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,308
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            643
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1



21.01

Subsidiaries of SmartSources.com Inc.



Nifco Investments Ltd. was incorporated in the province of British Columbia,
Canada in September 1998. It conducts business as Nifco Investments Ltd.

SmartSources.com Technologies Inc. is a British Columbia corporation organized
in 1990. It conducts business as SmartSources.com.

Intelli Trade Inc. is a British Columbia corporation organized in 1994. It
conducts business as Intelli Trade Inc.

Origin Software Corporation is a British Columbia corporation organized in
September 1998, conducting business as Origin Software Corporation.

Infer Technologies Inc. is a Delaware corporation organized in 1999. It conducts
business as Infer Technologies Inc.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1671

JOHN L. BOYLE, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HARFORD COUNTY; HOWARD WALTER; RICHARD AIELLO;

COLBURN DORSEY; ELWOOD DEHAVEN; GARY SOHL;

JOSEPH P. MEADOWS,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge.

(CA-01-3200-BEL)

Submitted: January 12, 2005 Decided: January 25, 2005

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Howard J. Needle, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. J. Joseph

Curran, Jr., Attorney General of Maryland, Cynthia G. Peltzman,

Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, Robert S. McCord,
- 2 -

County Attorney, Philip S. Roberts, Deborah S. Duvall, Senior

Assistant County Attorneys, Bel Air, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:

John L. Boyle, Jr. appeals the district court’s order

summarily dismissing his claims for religious discrimination and

retaliation for whistle blowing, based on Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000); 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (2000); the First Amendment; and the Public Policy of

the State of Maryland; and dismissing the remaining state law

claims without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order on the

reasoning of the district court. See Boyle v. Harford County, No.

CA-01-3200-BEL (D. Md. Apr. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1433 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1433

 To require the Secretary of Labor to establish a program under which 
 employers may consult with State officials respecting compliance with 
              occupational safety and health requirements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 1995

  Mr. Hayes (for himself and Mr. Ballenger) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Economic and Educational 
                             Opportunities

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of Labor to establish a program under which 
 employers may consult with State officials respecting compliance with 
              occupational safety and health requirements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Occupational Safety and Health 
Administration Consultation Services Authorization Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. CONSULTATION PROGRAM.

    The Secretary of Labor, in the administration of the Occupational 
Safety and Health Act of 1970, shall establish and support cooperative 
agreements with the States under which employers subject to such Act 
may consult with designated State officials with respect to--
            (1) the application of occupational safety and health 
        requirements under such Act or under State plans approved under 
        section 18 of such Act; and
            (2) voluntary efforts that employers may undertake to 
        establish and maintain safe and healthful employment and places 
        of employment.
                                 <all>
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending September 9, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Heddleston, Appellant, *v.*Mack, Warden, Appellee.

[Cite as *Heddleston v. Mack*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 213.]

(No. 98-1679

Submitted December 2, 1998

Decided December 30, 1998.)

*David A. Heddleston, Jr., pro se.*

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Diane Mallory,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

*Per Curiam.*

Heddleston asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his habeas corpus petition. For the reasons that follow, however, Heddleston’s contention lacks merit.

First, Heddleston had adequate remedies by appeal or postconviction relief to review his claims of sentencing error, because these claims are not jurisdictional. *Smith v. Walker*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 431, 432, 700 N.E.2d 592, 592.

Second, the fact that Heddleston may have already invoked an alternate remedy, *i.e.,*a motion to correct jail-time credit, does not entitle him to extraordinary relief to relitigate the issue. *State ex rel. Sampson v. Parrott*(1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 92, 93, 694 N.E.2d 463.

*214Finally, habeas corpus is generally available only when the petitioner’s maximum sentence has expired and he is being held unlawfully. *Morgan v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.*(1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 344, 346, 626 N.E.2d 939, 941. Heddleston’s maximum sentence has not expired. His claim is instead limited to earlier consideration of parole based on the alleged expiration of the minimum term of his sentence. But earlier consideration of parole is not tantamount to a legal right to release from prison. *State ex rel. Carrion v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.*(1998), 80 Ohio St.3d 637, 637-638, 687 N.E.2d 759, 760; *State ex rel. Newell v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas*(1997), 77 Ohio St.3d 269, 270, 673 N.E.2d 1299, 1300.

Based on the foregoing, the court of appeals properly dismissed Heddleston’s habeas corpus petition. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1419 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1419

  To provide an exemption with respect to gambling devices on certain 
                vessels making voyages on Lake Michigan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 1995

Mr. Visclosky introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide an exemption with respect to gambling devices on certain 
                vessels making voyages on Lake Michigan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That, for purposes of 
section 5(b)(1)(A) of the Act of January 2, 1951 (15 U.S.C. 
1175(b)(1)(A)), commonly known as the ``Johnson Act'', a vessel on a 
voyage that originates in the territorial jurisdiction of the State of 
Indiana and that does not leave Lake Michigan shall be considered to be 
a vessel that is not within the boundaries of any State or possession 
of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending October 18, 2008

|Filer                      | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                                  
|-------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------
|Bancorp of Lexington, Inc. | 3A1            | Bancorp of Lexington, Inc., Lexington, KY to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100% of the voting shares of Bank of Lexington, Inc., Lexington, KY. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                 | Not applicable
|Federal Register:          | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 59.10-1 Scope. ( a ) Repairs to boilers or pressure vessels in service may be performed by welding provided the welding meets the applicable requirements of part 57 of this subchapter.
( b ) No repairs by welding must be made except temporary emergency repairs without prior approval of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection. Emergency repairs must be replaced with permanent repairs meeting the requirements of this subchapter when the vessel returns to a port in which an Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, is located.
( c ) Repair welding of power boilers not meeting the requirements of subpart 52.05 of this subchapter is prohibited.
( d ) Only welded repairs as specified in this subchapter are permitted on boilers and pressure vessels. The welding repairs allowed by this subpart apply only to boilers and pressure vessels fabricated of carbon steel. Welding repairs to boilers and pressure vessels fabricated of alloy steel will be given special consideration by the Commandant. Such other method of repairs by means of welding not covered in this subchapter must be referred to the Commandant.
T HIS P LACE -H OLDER P AGE R EPLACES THE

P ARTICLE S IZE D ISTRIBUTION R EPORT C LAIMED CBI

(54 PAGES )