alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012184EN.01000202.xml

| 23.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/2

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 8 March 2012 — Brück Edgar v Agentur für Arbeit Villingen-Schwenningen — Familienkasse

(Case C-126/12)

2012/C 184/03

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Brück Edgar

Applicant:

Defendants: Agentur für Arbeit Villingen-Schwenningen — Familienkasse

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Are Article 13(1) and Article 13(2)(a) of Regulation No 1408/71 (1) to be interpreted as precluding the granting of (differential) child benefit by a Member State of residence, in cases where a person entitled to child benefit — like the other parent — is a cross-border commuter employed in Switzerland and draws family benefits there in respect of his children living in the Member State of residence which are lower than the child benefit provided for in the Member State of residence?

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community, OJ 1971 L 149, p. 2 (English special edition: Series I Chapter 1971(II) P. 0416), as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996, OJ 1997 L 28, p. 1, and Regulation (EC) No 647/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 April 2005, OJ 2005 L 117, p. 1.

1

---
#### § 175.900 OMB control numbers.

(a) *Purpose.* This section lists the control numbers assigned to information collection and recordkeeping requirements in this subchapter by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et. seq.*). The Coast Guard intends that this section comply with the requirements of 44 U.S.C. 3507(f) which requires that agencies display a current control number assigned by the Director of OMB for each approved agency information collection requirement.

(b) *Display.*

| 46 CFR Section where identified | Current OMB Control Number |
| --- | --- |
| 176.105(a) | 1625-0057 |
| 176.202 | 1625-0057 |
| 176.204 | 1625-0057 |
| 176.302 | 1625-0057 |
| 176.306 | 1625-0057 |
| 176.310 | 1625-0057 |
| 176.500(a) | 1625-0057 |
| 176.612 | 1625-0057 |
| 176.700 | 1625-0057 |
| 176.704 | 1625-0057 |
| 176.710 | 1625-0057 |
| 176.810(b) | 1625-0057 |
| 176.920(c) | 1625-0057 |
| 176.930 | 1625-0057 |
| 177.202 | 1625-0057 |
| 177.315 | 1625-0057 |
| 177.330 | 1625-0057 |
| 177.335 | 1625-0057 |
| 177.340 | 1625-0057 |
| 178.210 | 1625-0057 |
| 178.220 | 1625-0057 |
| 178.230 | 1625-0057 |
| 181.610 | 1625-0057 |
| 182.460(e) | 1625-0057 |
| 182.610(f) | 1625-0057 |
| 183.220(d) | 1625-0057 |
| 183.320 (d) and (e) | 1625-0057 |
| 184.420 | 1625-0057 |
| 184.506 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.202 | 1625-0001 |
| 185.206 | 1625-0001 |
| 185.208 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.220 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.230 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.280 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.340(c) | 1625-0057 |
| 185.402 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.420 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.502 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.503 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.504 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.506 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.510 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.514 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.516 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.518 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.520 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.524 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.602 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.604 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.606 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.608 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.610 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.612 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.702 | 1625-0057 |
| 185.704(c) | 1625-0057 |
| 185.728(c) | 1625-0057 |

[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 947, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by USCG-2004-18884, 69 FR 58351, Sept. 30, 2004]
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

v Case No. 15-20382 

Hon. Victoria A. Roberts 

PAUL NICOLETTI, 

 Defendant. 

_________________________________/ 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR LEAVE TO ISSUE SUBPOENAS 

The Court having read Defendant’s Stipulated Motion for Leave to Issue 

Subpoenas and otherwise being duly advised of the issues: 

IT IS ORDERED THAT pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. Pro. 17 (c) and LCrR 17:1, the 

Defendant, through his counsel may issue subpoenas to (1) Fifth Third Bancorp, (2) Fifth 

Third Bank, (3) Fifth Third Mortgage, LLC, and (4) Computer Forensic Services, LLC. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

 S/ Victoria A. Roberts 

 Victoria A. Roberts 

 United States Judge 

Dated: 2/21/18 

CRAIG WEIER 

Assistant United States Attorney 

/s/ Craig Weier P (with permission) _______ 

Assistant U.S. Attorney 

211 W. Fort Street, Ste. 2001 

Detroit, MI 48226 

Craig.weier@usdoj.gov 

Tel: (313) 226-9678 

/s/Michael Harrison ___ 

Attorney for Paul Nicoletti 

Harrison Law 

240 Daines Street 

Birmingham MI 48009 

michael@harrisonlawplc.com 

Tel: 248-220-3324 

Dated: 2/20/18 

2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM Doc # 76 Filed 02/21/18 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 635
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending January 5, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 327.8 Court action. ( a ) No seamen, having a claim specified in subsections (2) and (3) of section 1(a) of 50 U.S.C. App. 1291(a), their surviving dependents and beneficiaries, or their legal representatives shall institute a court action for the enforcement of such claim unless such claim shall have been prepared and filed in accordance with §§ 327.4 and 327.5 and shall have been administratively disallowed in accordance with § 327.6 or § 327.7.
( b ) This part prescribes rules and regulations pertaining to the filing of claims designated in § 327.3 and the administrative allowance, or disallowance (actual and presumed), of such claims, in whole or in part, filed by officers and members of crews (hereafter referred to as “seamen”) employed on vessels through the National Shipping Authority (NSA), Maritime Administration (MarAd), or successor organization.
§ 385.52 Criteria: Applicant. The criteria to be used by MarAd in evaluating all applicants prior to award of a grant or cooperative agreement are as follows: ( a ) The qualifications, capabilities, resources (both financial and technical) and experience of the applicant;
( b ) The facilities or techniques which the proposer possesses and offers which are considered to be integral factors for achieving the objectives of the proposal;
( c ) The qualifications, capabilities, and experiences of the proposed investigator, team leader, or key personnel, who are considered to be critical in achieving the objectives of the proposal;
( d ) The precision and detail with which the applicant states its plan to further the formally adopted socioeconomic and environmental policies of the United States e.g., the encouragement of minority business enterprises); and,
( e ) The extent to which the applicant will share the total estimated cost of the project.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel, “Health and Behavior, Special Emphasis Panel”.                    

*Date:*                         June 21-22, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Double Tree Hotel, Executive Meeting Center Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                     

*Contact person:*                         Michele C. Hindi-Alexander, PhD, Division of Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, National Institute for Child Health, and Human Development, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20812-7510, (301) 435-8382,                         *hindialm@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 21, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2616 Filed 5-25-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00455-CV

In re the Office of the Attorney 

General of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

Original Proceeding

From the 324th District Court

of Tarrant County (324-530590-13)

February 6, 2014

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the petition for writ of mandamus filed by relator 

The Office of the Attorney General. We conditionally grant relator’s petition. Writ 

will issue only if the trial court fails to vacate its November 27, 2013 order in 

accordance with the opinion.

It is ordered that real party interest, Curtis Rogers, pay all costs of this 

proceeding, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By ___/s/ Lee Gabriel__________________

 Justice Lee Gabriel
§ 190.05-15 Segregation of spaces containing the emergency source of electric power. ( a ) When a compartment containing the emergency source of electric power, or vital components thereof, adjoins a space containing either the ship's service generators or machinery necessary for the operation of the ship's service generators, all common bulkheads and/or decks shall be protected by approved “structural insulation” or other approved material. This protection shall be such as to be capable of preventing an excessive temperature rise in the space containing the emergency source of electric power, or vital components thereof, for a period of at least 1 hour in the event of fire in the adjoining space. Bulkheads or decks meeting Class A-60 requirements, as defined by § 72.05-10 of Subchapter H (Passenger Vessels) of this chapter, will be considered as meeting the requirements of this paragraph.
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49223, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60144, Sept. 30, 2013.

#### § 2.01-30 Delegation of OCMI signature authority.

The Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, may redelegate signature authority for documents issued under this subpart to: one individual on his or her staff; and each Marine Safety Unit Commanding Officer within his or her Sector.

[USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49223, Sept. 25, 2009]
§ 5.61 Acts or offenses for which revocation of credentials is sought. ( a ) An investigating officer seeks revocation of a respondent's credential or endorsements when one of the following acts or offenses is found proved: ( 1 ) Assault with a dangerous weapon.
( 2 ) Misconduct resulting in loss of life or serious injury.
( 3 ) Rape or sexual molestation.
( 4 ) Murder or attempted murder.
( 5 ) Mutiny.
( 6 ) Perversion.
( 7 ) Sabotage.
( 8 ) Smuggling of aliens.
( 9 ) Incompetence.
( 10 ) Interference with master, ship's officers, or government officials in performance of official duties.
( 11 ) Wrongful destruction of ship's property.
( b ) An investigating officer may seek revocation of a respondent's credential or endorsements when the circumstances of an act or offense found proved or consideration of the respondent's prior record indicates that permitting such person to serve under the credential or endorsements would be clearly a threat to the safety of life or property, or detrimental to good discipline.
[CGD 82-002, 50 FR 32184, Aug. 9, 1985, as amended by USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11215, Mar. 16, 2009]
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 
 Certification
Pursuant to
 Exchange
Act Rule 15d-14(b) and
 18
U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Astrata Group Incorporated (the ”Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending November 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Martin Euler, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 i.
              The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act 1934;
and
 
 ii.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Astrata Group Incorporated and will be
retained by Astrata Group Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated:  January
      14, 2009
                  /s/MARTIN G.
      EULER
                    Name: Martin
      G. Euler
                    Title:   Chief
      Executive Officer
## NO. 12

- 10

- 00 0 22

- C V

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

' IN RE: ANTHONY WAYNE WHITE, RELATOR ' ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
' MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Relator Anthony Wayne White complains in this original p roceeding that he is being harassed by certain employees of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. 1 He requests a writ of mandamus directing these individuals to cease their retaliatory conduct,
which he believes is the result of his status as a ―writ writer.‖ 2 A court of appeals has the authority to issue writs of mandamus against a judge of a district or county in the court of appeals district and all writs necessary to enforce its jurisdiction. T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 22.221 ( Vernon 2004). In order for employees of Texas Department of Criminal Justice to fall within our jurisdictional reach, it must be established that the issuance of the writ of mandamus is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. See id .; In re Coronado , 980 S.W.2d 691, 692

- 93 (Tex. App.

– San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding). White has not demonstrated that the exercise of our mandamus authority against the respondents is appropriate to enforce our jurisdiction. Consequently, we have no authority to issue a wr it of mandamus. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction

. Opinion delivered January 29 , 2010. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)

1 The respondents are Nathaniel Quarterman, Director of Texas Department of Criminal Justice

— Institutional Division; Lieutenant Johnathan Eastep; Kenneth Nash; Michael Beil; Warden Raymond Thompson; Dan Gannon; and Lisa Green.

2 White filed a document that is entitled, in part, ―Motion to Advise Court that Appellant is Being Restrained of His Liberty and Property. . . ,‖ requesting an order requiring prison employees and officials to cease their retaliatory acts or methods. Alternatively, he states t hat we may construe the document as a petition for writ of mandamus, and we have opted to do so.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending August 18, 2007

|Filer                     | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------
|HOMETOWN BANCSHARES, INC. | * 3A5       | Hometown Bancshares, Inc. Middlebourne, West Virginia to acquire First Community Bancorp, Inc., St. Marys, West Virginia, pursuant to section 3(a)(5) of the BHCA.  First National Bank of St. Marys, St. Marys, West Virginia will be merged with and into Union Bank, Inc., Hometown's subsidiary bank located in Middlebourne, West Virginia. | Newspaper:09/07/2007Federal Register:08/31/2007
|Newspaper:                | 09/07/2007 
|Federal Register:         | 08/31/2007 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael C. Frederick, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                        |  |     |  |                                                                                                          
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|DATE: November 14, 2008 |  | BY: |  | /s/ Michael C. Frederick                                                                                 
|                        |  |     |  | Michael C. Frederick                                                                                     
|                        |  |     |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### § 295.1 Purpose.

This part prescribes regulations implementing the provisions of subtitle B (Maritime Security Fleet Program) of title VI of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended, governing Maritime Security Program payments for vessels operating in the foreign trade or mixed foreign and domestic commerce of the United States allowed under a registry endorsement issued under 46 U.S.C. 12105.