alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         244,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,015,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  597,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   273,000
<INVENTORY>                                     55,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,709,000
<PP&E>                                       4,032,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,607,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,329,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          832,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,000
<COMMON>                                        89,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,297,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,329,000
<SALES>                                      1,491,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,491,000
<CGS>                                           47,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,210,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,653,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,653,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,653,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.14.1


November 3, 2004


Rick Kundrat
 NuVim Inc.
 12 Route 17 North
 Paramus, NJ 07652

	
  
 
  	
  
Re:
  	
  
Amendment to   Services Agreement and Convertible Promissory Note, each dated July 26, 2004;   Second Amendment to Services Agreement and Warrant, each dated September 14,   2004
  




Dear Rick:


          Under the terms of the above-referenced documents, the passage of the date January 1, 2005 triggers certain rights to me. By this letter, I hereby agree that in each of the documents, the date January 1, 2005 shall be amended to be March 31, 2005.

	
  
 
  	
  
Very truly   yours,
  
	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
   
  	
  /s/ DICK CLARK
  
	
   
  	
  


  
	
   
  	
  Dick Clark
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel, ZEB1 OSR-D M1 Training Grants Review.                    

*Date:*                         February 27, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Double Tree Hotel Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         John Hayes, Scientific Review Administrator, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 959, Democracy Two, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 451-3398,                         *hayesj@mail.nih.gov*.                    

Dated: January 12, 2007.

David Clary,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-238  Filed 1-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1432

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to eliminate

multicandidate political committees, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 6, 1995

Mr. GREENWOOD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Oversight

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

eliminate multicandidate political committees, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF MULTICANDIDATE POLITICAL

4 COMMITTEES.

5 Section 315(a) of the Federal Election Campaign Act

6 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a(a)) is amended—

7 (1) in the matter before subparagraph (A) in

8 paragraph (1), by striking out ‘‘No person’’ and in9 serting in lieu thereof ‘‘No individual’’;

10 (2) by striking out paragraph (2);
2

•HR 1432 IH

1 (3) in the first sentence of paragraph (4), by

2 striking out ‘‘paragraphs (1) and (2)’’ and inserting

3 in lieu thereof ‘‘paragraph (1)’’;

4 (4) by striking out the second sentence of para5 graph (4);

6 (5) in paragraph (5), by striking out ‘‘and

7 paragraph (2)’’ each place it appears; and

8 (6) in paragraph (6), by striking out ‘‘para9 graphs (1) and (2)’’ and inserting in lieu thereof

10 ‘‘paragraph (1)’’.

11 SEC. 2. RETURN OF COORDINATED EXPENDITURE LIMITA12 TION AMOUNTS TO THEIR ORIGINAL LEVELS.

13 The second sentence of section 315(c)(1) of the Fed14 eral Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a(c)(1))

15 is amended by inserting after ‘‘subsection (d)’’ the follow16 ing: ‘‘(other than the limitations under subsection

17 (d)(3))’’.

18 SEC. 3. ELIMINATION OF SPECIAL CONTRIBUTIONS BY CER19 TAIN POLITICAL PARTY SENATORIAL CAM20 PAIGN COMMITTEES.

21 Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act

22 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a) is amended by striking out sub23 section (h).
3

•HR 1432 IH

1 SEC. 4. ELIMINATION OF CONTRIBUTIONS BETWEEN AU2 THORIZED COMMITTEES.

3 Paragraph (3) of section 302(e) of the Federal Elec4 tion Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 432(e)(3)) is

5 amended—

6 (1) by striking out ‘‘(3)(A)’’ and inserting in

7 lieu thereof ‘‘(3)’’;

8 (2) by striking out ‘‘(i)’’ and inserting in lieu

9 thereof ‘‘(A)’’;

10 (3) by striking out ‘‘(ii)’’ and inserting in lieu

11 thereof ‘‘(B)’’; and

12 (4) by striking out subparagraph (B).

13 SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.

14 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with

15 respect to elections taking place more than two years after

16 the date of the enactment of this Act, except that no con17 tribution or expenditure made before that date shall be

18 taken into consideration in determining whether a viola19 tion of a provision of the Federal Election Campaign Act

20 of 1971 amended by this Act has occurred.

Æ
§ 32.52-10 Bilge pumps and piping on tank vessels constructed or converted prior to November 19, 1952—TB/ALL. ( a ) On tank vessels, the construction or conversion of which was started prior to November 19, 1952, bilge pumps and piping which do not fully comply with the regulations of this subchapter shall be made as nearly equal to the requirements for tank vessels constructed on or after November 19, 1952, as is necessary in the interest of safety.
( b ) Bilge suctions from hold spaces containing independent cargo tanks may be connected to cargo pumps or stripping pumps, provided the installation complies with the requirements of § 32.52-5(b).
Adams, Kevin (OST)

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

December 16, 2013

Dear Kevin:

Gail Ochs <gail@Aberdeen-chamber.com>

Monday, December 16, 2013 10:24 AM

Adams, Kevin (OSn

Support for EASProposal

.'13 "-C L, "e 1b A /I: 0i.I

The Aberdeen Chamber of Commerce's Transportation Committee held a meeting on

11/26/2013 and after discussion about the proposal for Essential Air Service in Aberdeen, it

was decided to submit a comment supporting SkyWest's bid for service in Aberdeen.

SkyWest has served the needs of our community well over the past two years and we would

like to see them continue to provide our community with air service. The proposal that they

submitted meets the service level required under the Essential Air Service program and they

are requesting a lower subsidy amount than they are currently receiving. On behalf of the

Transportation Committee, please select SkyWest as the carrier to serve Aberdeen for the next

two years.

Sincerely,

GailOchs

President

Aberdeen Area Chamber of Commerce

1

,

,
#### Bill Jones v. The State.

*No. 6625.*

*Decided June 12.*

1. Practice—Charge of the Court.—The indictment alleged the ownership of the stolen property to be in Frank Paxton and C. C. McClure, and the court charged the jury as follows: “If from the evidence adduced in this case you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that * * * defendant unlawfully took one cow, * * * the property of Frank Paxton and C. C. McClure, without the consent of said Paxton and said McClure *or of either of them,"*etc. *Weld,*that the words italicised should have been omitted, and that the charge as to consent should have been “ without the consent of Frank Paxton and without the consent of C. C. McClure,” etc.

*2.*Theft—Pact Case.—See the statement of the case for the substance of evidence *held*insufficient to support a conviction for theft.

Appeal from the District Court of Llano. Tried below before Hon. A. W. Moursund.

The conviction in this case was for the theft of a cow, the property of Paxton and McClure. The penalty assessed against the appellant was a term of two years in the penitentiary.

With reference to the proof on the trial *suffcit*that it showed the taking from the possession of Paxton and McClure in Llano County of a cow of a certain description, and that thereafter the defendant sold a cow of the same description to one Whitfield in Williamson County. By his. brother A. E. Jones and by Bud Miller the defendant proved his purchase of the cow he sold Whitfield from one Ed Smith, who claimed to live in San Saba County; and by W. 0. Hartley it was proved that Ed Smith lived in said Llano County some years prior to this trial and that he had been in said county as a visitor since his removal therefrom.

*Miller & Lauderdale,*for appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

This conviction is for the theft of a cow, and must be set aside because of a fundamental error in the charge of the court. The indictment alleges ownership of the cow in two persons jointly, to wit, Frank Paxton and C. C. McClure, and the jury are instructed in the charge as follows: “If from the evidence adduced in this case you are-satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that * * * defendant unlawfully took one cow, * * * the property of Frank Paxton and C. C. McClure, without the consent of said Paxton and said McClure *or of either of them,”*etc. The words “or of either of them” should have been omitted, and the charge as to consent should have been “without the consent of Frank Paxton and without the consent of C. C. McClure,” etc. Woods v. The State, 26 Texas Ct. App., 490.

Other questions presented in the record are not considered, as they are *43not likely to arise on another trial. We will remark, however, that as presented in the statement of facts the evidence does not in our opinion warrant the conviction, but upon another trial sufficient proof of defendant's guilt may be adduced.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*

Judges all present and concurring.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Tanisha Ross,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 15-12353

Commissioner of Social Security, Honorable Sean F. Cox

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER 

ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

This is a social security appeal. On June 30, 2015 Plaintiff Tanisha Ross filed her Complaint

against the Commissioner of Social Security, appealing an Administrative Law Judge’s denial of

her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental income benefits. (Doc. #1). 

The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. (Pl. Mo., Doc. #11; Def.’s Mo., Doc.

#13). The motions were ultimately referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford for issuance

of a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). (Doc. #2). 

 On August 10, 2016, Magistrate Judge Stafford issued a Report and Recommendation

(“R&R”) wherein she recommended that this Court GRANT Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary

Judgment, DENY Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and REMAND the case for further

proceedings consistent with the R&R. (R&R, Doc. #15). 

Pursuant to Civil Rule 72, a party objecting to the recommended disposition of a matter by

a Magistrate Judge must file objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after being served with

a copy of the R&R. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). “The district judge must determine de novo any part

of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). 

2:15-cv-12353-SFC-EAS Doc # 16 Filed 09/01/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 737
Neither party has filed objections to the R&R and the time for doing so has passed. 

Furthermore, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. Therefore, the Court

hereby ADOPTS the August 10, 2016 R&R. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s

Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #11) is GRANTED, Defendant’s Motion for Summary

Judgment (Doc. #13) is DENIED, and the Commissioner’s decision is REMANDED for further

proceedings consistent with the August 10, 2016 R&R. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S/Sean F. Cox 

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge

Dated: September 1, 2016

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on

September 1, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Shawna C. Burns 

Case Manager Generalist

2:15-cv-12353-SFC-EAS Doc # 16 Filed 09/01/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 738
Exhibit 32.1

               Statement Furnished Pursuant to Section 906 of the
               Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

      The undersigned, Andrew Gordon is the President and Chief Executive
Officer and Principal Executive and Accounting Officer of Coffee Holding Co.,
Inc. (the "Company").

      This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
October 31, 2003 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that:

            A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

            B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that
this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended.

Dated: January 25, 2004                         /s/ Andrew Gordon
                                                --------------------------
                                                Andrew Gordon

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 45.67 Sheer measurement. ( a ) The sheer is measured from the freeboard deck at side to a line of reference drawn parallel to the keel through the sheer line at amidships;
( b ) In ships designed with a rake of keel or designed to trim by the stern, the sheer must be measured in reference to a line drawn through the sheer line at amidships parallel to the design load waterline.
( c ) In flush deck ships and in ships with detached superstructures, the sheer must be measured at the freeboard deck.
( d ) In ships with a step or break in the topsides, the sheer must be measured from the equivalent depth amidships.
( e ) In vessels with a superstructure of standard height that extends over the whole length of the freeboard deck, the sheer must be measured on the superstructure deck. Where the height of superstructure exceeds the standard, the least difference (Z) between the actual and standard heights must be added to each end ordinate. Similarly, the intermediate ordinates at distance of 1 ⁄ 6 *L* and 1 ⁄ 3 *L* from each perpendicular must be increased by 0.444 Z and 0.111 Z respectively.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending September 8, 2007

|Filer                | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                              
|-------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------
|MINERS EXCHANGE BANK | * Branch       | Miners Exchange Bank, Coeburn, Virginia, proposes to esatblish a branch at 1221 Lynn Garden Drive, Kingsport, Tennessee. | Newspaper:09/21/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:           | 09/21/2007    
|Federal Register:    | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 308.529 Surety Bond B, Form MA-309.

An Assured who elects to substitute a surety bond for a collateral deposit fund shall submit Form MA-309, which may be obtained from MARAD's underwriting agent or MARAD.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2571]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Wednesday May 23, 2007.
    The business of the Board requires that this meeting be held with 
less than one week's advance notice to the public, and no earlier 
announcement of the meeting was practicable.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Staff Resource Planning Issues.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave 
Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members at 202-452-
2955.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 18, 2007.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 07-2571 Filed 5-18-07; 3:02 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```