alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter
Ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report") by American Medical Alert Corp.
("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
  and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Registrant.





/s/
      Jack RhianJack
      RhianChief
      Executive Officer andPresident





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to American Medical Alert Corp. and will be retained by American
Medical Alert Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### § 532.4 NVOCC rules tariff.

Before entering into NRAs under this Part, an NVOCC must provide electronic access to its rules tariffs to the public free of charge.
#### § 177.100 General requirement.

The construction and arrangement of a vessel must allow the safe operation of the vessel in accordance with the terms of its Certificate of Inspection giving consideration to provisions for a seaworthy hull, protection against fire, means of escape in case of a sudden unexpected casualty, guards and rails in hazardous places, ventilation of enclosed spaces, and necessary facilities for passengers and crew.

[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 961, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51050, Sept. 30, 1997]
#### In the Matter of J. Harsen Rhoades.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
§ 45.133 Air pipes. ( a ) Where an air pipe to any tank extends above the freeboard or superstructure deck— ( 1 ) The exposed part of the air pipe must be made of steel and of sufficient thickness to avoid breaking from impact of boarding seas.
( 2 ) The air pipe must have a permanently attached means of closing its opening; and
( 3 ) The height from the deck to any point where water may obtain access below deck must be at least 30 in above the freeboard deck, 24 in above raised quarter decks, and 12 in above other superstructure decks.
( b ) If the height required in paragraph (a) of this section interferes with working the ship, the Commandant may approve a lower height after considering the closing arrangements.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending April 28, 2007

|Filer                      | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                              
|-------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|COMMUNITY TRUST BANK, INC. | * Branch       | Community Trust Bank, Inc., Pikeville, KY to establish a branch at Pullman Square, Huntington, WV.                                                                  | Newspaper:04/25/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                 | 04/25/2007    
|Federal Register:          | Not applicable
|MINSTER BANK               | * Branch       | Minster Bank, Minster, OH to provide mobile branch services to particular customers in Allen, Augulaize, Mercer, Shelby, Darke, Miami, and Montgomery Counties, OH. | Newspaper:05/05/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                 | 05/05/2007    
|Federal Register:          | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit
      32.3





**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter
      Ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") by American Medical Alert Corp.
      ("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.




/s/ Richard
              RalloRichard
              RalloChief
              Financial Officer





**A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to American Medical Alert Corp. and will be retained by American
      Medical Alert Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.**
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

JOHN ALLEN ALEXANDER, #182285, 

 Petitioner, 

 Case No. 15-cv-11364 

v. Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

BONITA HOFFNER, 

 Respondent. 

_________________________________/ 

JUDGMENT 

The above entitled came before the Court on a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. 

In accordance with the Opinion and Order entered on September 27, 2018: 

(1) The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. 

(2) A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. 

(3) Petitioner is granted leave to appeal In Forma Pauperis. 

 DAVID J. WEAVER 

 CLERK OF COURT 

 By: s/Holly A. Monda 

 Deputy Clerk 

Approved: 

s/Matthew F. Leitman 

MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

United States District Judge 

Dated: September 27, 2018 

Flint, Michigan
#### §§ 502.181-502.187 [Reserved]
#### §§ 531.13-531.98 [Reserved]
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2492 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 

discharges of student loans the repayment of which is income contingent 

or income based. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2009 

Mr. LEVIN (for himself, Mr. TIBERI, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. 

NEAL of Massachusetts, Mr. HINOJOSA, and Mr. DAVIS of Illinois) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

from gross income discharges of student loans the repayment of which is income contingent or income based. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN STUDENT LOANS THE REPAYMENT OF 

4 WHICH IS INCOME CONTINGENT OR INCOME 

5 BASED. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 108(f) 

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strikVerDate Nov 24 2008 05:27 May 20, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2492.IH H2492

smartinez on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2492 IH

1 ing ‘‘any student loan if’’ and all that follows and inserting 

2 ‘‘any student loan if— 

3 ‘‘(A) such discharge was pursuant to a provi4 sion of such loan under which all or part of the in5 debtedness of the individual would be discharged if 

6 the individual worked for a certain period of time in 

7 certain professions for any of a broad class of em8 ployers, or 

9 ‘‘(B) such discharge was pursuant to sub10 sections (d)(1)(D) and (e)(7) of section 455, or sec11 tion 493C(b)(7), of the Higher Education Act of 

12 1965 (relating to income contingent and income 

13 based repayment, respectively).’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 subsection (a) shall apply to discharges of loans after June 

16 30, 2009. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-12278-GAD-EAS

JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address

68.37.82.196,

Defendant.

/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

WITH PREJUDICE OF JOHN DOE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, Plaintiff has settled this matter with John Doe

(“Defendant”). Pursuant to the settlement agreement’s terms, Plaintiff hereby voluntarily

dismisses Defendant from this action with prejudice. John Doe was assigned the IP address

68.37.82.196. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) Defendant John Doe has neither answered

Plaintiff’s Complaint nor filed a motion for summary judgment.

Consistent herewith Plaintiff consents to the Court having its case closed for

administrative purposes.

Dated: August 25, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Paul J. Nicoletti

Paul J. Nicoletti

pauljnicoletti@gmail.com

NICOLETTI LAW, PLC

33717 Woodward Avenue, Suite #433

Birmingham, Michigan 48009

Phone: (248) 203-7800

Attorney for Plaintiff

2:15-cv-12278-GAD-EAS Doc # 6 Filed 08/25/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 53
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 25, 2015, I electronically filed the foregoing document

with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF and that service was perfected on all counsel of

record and interested parties through this system.

By: /s/ Paul J. Nicoletti_______

Paul J. Nicoletti

2:15-cv-12278-GAD-EAS Doc # 6 Filed 08/25/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 54
Exhibit 10.1
​
AMENDMENT TO THE
TG THERAPEUTICS, INC.
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 2012 INCENTIVE PLAN
This Amendment to the TG Therapeutics, Inc. Amended and Restated 2012 Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), is hereby adopted, effective as of the date indicated below.
W I T N E S E T H:
WHEREAS, TG Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Plan, and the Plan is currently in effect; and
WHEREAS, Section 16.1 of the Plan authorizes the Board or the Committee (as defined in the Plan) to amend the Plan, subject to certain limitations, including stockholder approval for certain amendments; and
WHEREAS, the Board has approved and authorized this Amendment to the Plan and has recommended that the stockholders of the Company approve this Amendment;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is hereby amended as follows, subject to and effective as of the date of stockholder approval hereof:
1.    Section 5.1. of the Plan is hereby amended by increasing the share references in such section from 18,000,000 to 26,000,000 (an 8,000,000 increase in the overall share reserve), so that such section reads in its entirety as follows:
“5.1 .NUMBER OF SHARES. Subject to adjustment as provided in Sections 5.2 and Section 15.1, the aggregate number of Shares reserved and available for issuance pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan shall be 26,000,000. The maximum number of Shares that may be issued upon exercise of Incentive Stock Options granted under the Plan shall be 26,000,000.”
2.    Section 3.2 of the Plan is hereby amended so that such section reads in its entirety as follows:
“3.2. TERMINATION OF PLAN. Unless earlier terminated as provided herein, the Plan shall continue in effect until June 18, 2030, or, if the stockholders approve an additional amendment to the Plan that increases the number of Shares subject to the Plan, the tenth anniversary of the date of such approval. The termination of the Plan on such date shall not affect the validity of any Award outstanding on the date of termination, which shall continue to be governed by the applicable terms and conditions of the Plan.”
3.    Section 11.1 of the Plan is hereby amended so that such section reads in its entirety as follows:
“11.1.OPTIONS AND STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS. The provisions of the Plan are intended to ensure that all Options and Stock Appreciation Rights granted hereunder to any Covered Employee prior to November 2, 2017, shall qualify for the Section 162(m) Exemption.”
4.    Except as specifically set forth herein, the terms of the Plan shall be and remain unchanged, and the Plan as amended shall remain in full force and effect.
The foregoing is hereby acknowledged as being the Amendment to the TG Therapeutics, Inc. Amended and Restated 2012 Incentive Plan, as adopted by the Board on April 24, 2020, and approved by the Company’s stockholders on June 18, 2020.
​



​
	​
	TG THERAPEUTICS, INC.

	​
	​

	​
	By:
	/s/ Sean Power

	​
	​

	​
	Its:
	Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

	​
	​



​
#### Cole *& a. v.*Laconia Savings-Bank.

The right of homestead exemption does not exist in land on which no home is established, or which is no part of a homestead and is not connected with one by beneficial use.

Bill tn Equity, for the assignment of a homestead (reported *ante, p.*53). The plaintiff Cole, and Prescott, owned the land in •common, and used it for raising hay. Neither of them lived upon the land, and there was no house upon it. The plaintiffs, Cole and his wife, were boarders about three miles away from the land. Cole had talked of buying Prescott’s interest in the land, but had no fixed purpose about it. The defendants, having an execution against Cole, levied it upon his undivided part of the land, subject only to his wife’s contingent right of dower.

*322Barnard, for the plaintiffs.

Hibbard, for the defendants.

Allen, J.

To entitle the claimant to a homestead, there must be a home established on the land claimed, or the land must be a part of that which constitutes the homestead, or connected with it by beneficial use. The case shows no home on the land, and the land is no part of a homestead, and is not connected with one by use, nor in any way appurtenant or incident to one. Mere intention cannot make a home.

*Bill dismissed.*

Bingham, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
<PAGE>   1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February
3, 2000, which appears in Commercial National Financial Corporation's annual
report on Form 10-K for 1999, in that corporation's previously filed
registration statements, as amended, for that corporation's 1989 Stock Option
Plan (Registration No. 33-30392), Dividend Reinvestment Plan (Registration No.
33-30239) and 1991 Stock Option Plan (Registration No. 33-39772 and 33-92666).


                                                  Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP


March 20, 2000
South Bend, Indiana
EXHIBIT 32
                                   ----------

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In  connection  with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of NanoPierce
Technologies,  Inc.  for  the  year  ended June 30, 2003, I, Kristi J. Kampmann,
Chief  Financial  Officer  of  NanoPierce  Technologies,  Inc.,  hereby  certify
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  to  my  knowledge,  that:

     (1)  such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. for
          the  year ended June 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of
          section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in  such  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
          NanoPierce Technologies, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2003, fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition and
          results  of  operations  of  NanoPierce  Technologies,  Inc.

                                   /s/Kristi  J.  Kampmann
                                   --------------------------------
                                   Kristi  J.  Kampmann,
                                     Chief  Financial  Officer
Date:  February  25,  2004

     A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  NanoPierce  Technologies,  Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by
NanoPierce  Technologies,  Inc.  and  furnished  to  the Securities and Exchange
Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.


<PAGE>
#### Milton De Lano, *Appellant, v.*Simon S. Harp and others, *Respondents.*

Appeal of Andrew J. Harp dismissed with ten dollars costs.. In other respects order affirmed with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements. Opinion by

Boardman, J.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1422

To amend the Job Training Partnership Act to provide for employment

and training assistance for certain individuals employed at a facility

at which the employer has made a public announcement that a substantial number of employees will be terminated or laid off from employment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 6, 1995

Mr. BARRETT of Wisconsin introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To amend the Job Training Partnership Act to provide for

employment and training assistance for certain individuals employed at a facility at which the employer has

made a public announcement that a substantial number

of employees will be terminated or laid off from employment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1422 IH

1 SECTION 1. EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ASSISTANCE FOR

2 CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS UNDER THE JOB

3 TRAINING PARTNERSHIP ACT.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 314(h)(1) of the Job

5 Training Partnership Act (29 U.S.C. 1661c(h)(1)) is

6 amended—

7 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A),

8 by inserting after ‘‘that such facility will close’’ the

9 following: ‘‘or at which the employer has made a

10 public announcement that a substantial number of

11 employees will be terminated or laid off from em12 ployment’’; and

13 (2) in subparagraph (B), by inserting before

14 the period the following: ‘‘or beginning 180 days be15 fore the date on which the individual is scheduled to

16 be terminated or laid off from employment, as the

17 case may be’’.

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

19 subsection (a)(1) shall apply with respect to public an20 nouncements made by employers before, on, or after the

21 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
UNITED STATES

Pat Smith, Assistant Library Director Monticello Library 80 North Main Street Monticello, UT 84535 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 October 15, 2014

Subject: Request to retain public documents at the Monticello Library for public inspec ion Dear Ms. Smith: The purpose ofthis letter is to requestthatthe Monticello Library retain the enclosed documents atthe library for at least sixty (60) days for public inspection. These documents are the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency’s preliminary decision forthe proposed Clean AirAct Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration amendment permitforthe McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility on the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation nearthe city ofAneth, San Juan County, Utah. These documents are currently available forpublic comment. Please contact me at (415) 947-4156 or keIly.shaheerah(~iepa.gov ifyou have any questions.

Permits Office Air Division Environmental Engineer

Enclosures
#### § 502.229 Certification of record by presiding or other officer.

The presiding or other officer shall certify and transmit the entire record to the Commission when (a) exceptions are filed or the time therefor has expired, (b) notice is given by the Commission that the initial decision will be reviewed on its own initiative, or (c) the Commission requires the case to be certified to it for initial decision. [Rule 229.]
GAO-01-142R Navy Club of the United States of America

United States General Accounting Office

Washington, DC 20548

October 27, 2000

The Honorable Henry J. Hyde

Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary

House of Representatives

Subject: Federally Chartered Corporation: Review of the Financial Statement

Audit Report for the Navy Club of the United States of America for

Fiscal Year 1998

Dear Mr. Chairman:

As requested, we reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of the

Navy Club of the United States of America, a federally chartered corporation, for the

fiscal year ended July 31, 1998. The main purpose of the corporation is to further,

encourage, promote, and maintain comradeship among those persons who are or

have been in active service of the United States Navy, the United States Marine

Corps, or the United States Coast Guard.

Federally chartered corporations are required under 36 U.S.C. 10101 to

• present the corporation’s assets and liabilities and reasonable detail on the

corporation’s income and expenses in annual financial statements,

• obtain an annual financial audit by an independent public accountant, and

• submit the auditors’ report and the corporation’s financial statements to the

Congress.

The objective of our review was to determine whether the audit report complied with

the financial reporting requirements of the law. In carrying out our work, we

reviewed the corporation’s financial statements and the accompanying notes,

performed certain analytical procedures related to information presented in the

financial statements, reviewed the auditors’ report, and made inquiries to corporation

officials or the auditor as we deemed necessary. We did not review the auditors’

working papers. Our review disclosed no reportable instances of noncompliance.
Page 2 GAO-01-142R Navy Club of the United States of America

The audit report included the auditors’ opinion that the financial statements are fairly

presented. We are returning the audit report you sent with your letter.

Sincerely yours,

Jeffrey C. Steinhoff

Managing Director

Financial Management and Assurance

w/o Enclosure

(912013)