alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 10
Federal Reserve Bank of: Kansas City

## Filings received during the week ending September 1, 2007

|Filer                                                  | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------------------------------------------ | ----------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|INVESTORS FINANCIAL CORPORATION OF PETTIS COUNTY, INC. | CIC         | Notice by Shaun R. Hayes, St. Louis, Missouri, to acquire control of Investors Financial Corporation of Pettis County, Inc., parent of Excel Bank, both in Sedalia, Missouri, through the acquisition of voting shares. | Newspaper:09/24/2007Federal Register:09/10/2007
|Newspaper:                                             | 09/24/2007 
|Federal Register:                                      | 09/10/2007 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 34.17-10 Controls—T/ALL. ( a ) The foam agent, its container, measuring devices, and other items peculiar to the system shall be of an approved type.
( b ) The foam-producing material container and all controls and valves for the operation of the system shall be outside the space protected and shall not be located in such space as might be cut off or made inaccessible in the event of fire in any of the spaces protected. The control space shall be as convenient as practicable to one of the main escapes from the spaces protected, and shall be marked as required by § 35.40-10 of this subchapter. Where pumps are required, it shall not be necessary that they be started from the control space.
( c ) Complete, but simple instructions for the operation of the system shall be located in a conspicuous place at or near the controls.
( d ) The valves to the various spaces served shall be marked as required by § 35.40-10 of this subchapter.
#### Toledo Bar Association *v.*Zerner.

[Cite as *Toledo Bar Assn. v. Zerner*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 97.]

*98(No. 98-381

Submitted June 24, 1998

Decided November 25, 1998.)

*99
      *Julia Smith Wiley*and *William H. Gosline,*for relator.

*Reginald S. Jackson, Jr.,*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for two years. Costs are taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Lazarus, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Cynthia C. Lazarus, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for- Resnick, J.
Exhibit 32

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Relating to a Periodic Report
Containing Financial Statements

Each of, William J. Reuter, Chief Executive Officer, and Drew K. Hostetter, Chief Financial Officer, of
Susquehanna Bancshares, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, based on his knowledge:

(1) The Companys periodic
report containing financial statements on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: As of May 9, 2008



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |  |  |  | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
|                        |  | 
|/s/ William J. Reuter   |  |  |  | /s/ Drew K. Hostetter  
|William J. Reuter       |  |  |  | Drew K. Hostetter
§ 36.20-1 Flame screens—TB/ALL. ( a ) Flame screens may be omitted in the vent lines on cargo tanks.
( b ) [Reserved]
#### § 349.4 Decision on application.

MARAD will issue or deny certification (accompanied by an explanation in writing) to each applicant not later than 20 days after receipt of an application for certification.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

B.H., THE MOTHER

, Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES GUARDIAN AD LITEM

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3516

[ January 25, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Kirk Volker , Judge; L.T. Case No. 502016DP000015

.

Antony P. Ryan, Director and Paul O'Neil, Assistant Regional Counsel

of Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, West Palm Beach,

for appellant.

Sarah J . Rumph of Child ren Legal Services, Tallahassee, Meredith K.

Hall of Children’s Legal Services, Sara E. Goldfarb and Laura J. Lee of

Guar dian Ad Litem Program, Sanford, for appellees.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, M AY and D AMOORGIAN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 169.570 Lockout valves. ( a ) A lockout valve must be provided on any carbon dioxide extinguishing system protecting a space over 6,000 cubic feet in volume and installed or altered after [July 9, 2013. “Altered” means modified or refurbished beyond the maintenance required by the manufacturer's design, installation, operation and maintenance manual.
( b ) The lockout valve must be a manually operated valve located in the discharge manifold prior to the stop valve or selector valves. When in the closed position, the lockout valve must provide complete isolation of the system from the protected space or spaces, making it impossible for carbon dioxide to discharge in the event of equipment failure during maintenance.
( c ) The lockout valve design or locking mechanism must make it obvious whether the valve is open or closed.
( d ) A valve is considered a lockout valve if it has a hasp or other means of attachment to which, or through which, a lock can be affixed, or it has a locking mechanism built into it.
( e ) The master or person-in-charge must ensure that the valve is locked open at all times, except while maintenance is being performed on the extinguishing system, when the valve must be locked in the closed position.
( f ) Lockout valves added to existing systems must be approved by the Commandant as part of the installed system.
[USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33890, June 7, 2012]
#### § 50.10-30 Coast Guard number.

(a) The Coast Guard number means that number assigned to boilers and pressure vessels by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, who makes the final tests and inspections.

(b) The Coast Guard number must be stamped on the nameplates of boilers and pressure vessels.

(c) The Coast Guard number is comprised of the following:

(1) Three capital letters which identify the office of the issuing Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (see table 1 to [§ 50.10-30](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-50.10-30)); followed by,

(2) An OCMI serial number, by which the particular boiler or pressure vessel can be identified; the first two digits of which will identify the calendar year the number was assigned.

Table 1 to [§ 50.10-30](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-50.10-30)—Previous Sector Office Identification Letters in Coast Guard Numbers for Boilers and Pressure Vessels

| Identification | Sector Office |
| --- | --- |
| ALB | Albany. |
| ANC | Anchorage. |
| BAL | Baltimore. |
| BOS | Boston. |
| BUF | Buffalo. |
| CHA | Charleston. |
| CHI | Chicago. |
| CIN | Cincinnati. |
| CLE | Cleveland. |
| COR | Corpus Christi. |
| DET | Detroit. |
| DUL | Duluth. |
| GAL | Galveston. |
| GUA | Guam. |
| HON | Honolulu. |
| HOU | Houston. |
| HRV | Hampton Roads, VA. |
| HUN | Huntington. |
| JAC | Jacksonville. |
| JUN | Juneau. |
| LIS | Long Island. |
| LOS | Los Angeles. |
| LOU | Louisville. |
| MEM | Memphis. |
| MIA | Miami. |
| MIL | Milwaukee. |
| MIN | Minneapolis. |
| MOB | Mobile. |
| MOR | Morgan City. |
| NAS | Nashville. |
| NEW | New Orleans. |
| NYC | New York. |
| PAD | Paducah. |
| PAT | Port Arthur. |
| PHI | Philadelphia. |
| PIT | Pittsburgh. |
| POM | Portland, ME. |
| POR | Portland, OR. |
| PRO | Providence. |
| ROT | Rotterdam. |
| SAV | Savannah. |
| SDC | San Diego. |
| SEA | Seattle. |
| SFC | San Francisco. |
| SIM | Saint Ignace. |
| SJP | San Juan. |
| SLM | St. Louis. |
| STB | Sturgeon Bay. |
| TAM | Tampa. |
| TOL | Toledo. |
| VAL | Valdez. |
| WNC | Wilmington, NC. |

[CGFR 68-82, [33 FR 18808](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/33-FR-18808), Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGFR 69-127, [35 FR 9975](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/35-FR-9975), June 17, 1970; CGD 74-219, [39 FR 40158](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/39-FR-40158), Nov. 14, 1974; CGD 78-161, [44 FR 13492](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-13492), Mar. 12, 1979; USCG-2000-7790, [65 FR 58459](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/65-FR-58459), Sept. 29, 2000; USCG-2006-25556, [72 FR 36330](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/72-FR-36330), July 2, 2007; USCG-2020-0634, [89 FR 50094](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/89-FR-50094), June 12, 2024]
###### Editorial Note on Part 160

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 160.156-1 Scope.

This subpart prescribes standards, tests, and procedures for seeking Coast Guard approval of a rescue boat, including a fast rescue boat, complying with SOLAS and the IMO LSA Code, for use on waters other than protected waters as defined in 46 CFR 175.400.
#### Office of Disciplinary Counsel *v.*Taylor, a.k.a. Civiello.

[Cite as *Disciplinary Counsel v. Taylor*(1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 390.]

(No. 98-1322

Submitted September 16, 1998

Decided January 13, 1999.)

*391
      *Jonathan E. Coughlan,*Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

*Charles W. Kettlewell,*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

In *Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. Dworken*(1934), 129 Ohio St. 23, 28, 1 O.O. 313, 315, 193 N.E. 650, 652, we held that the practice of law “ ‘includes legal advice and counsel, and the preparation of legal instruments and contracts by which legal rights are secured ***.’” In *Green v. Huntington Natl. Bank*(1965), 4 Ohio St.2d 78, 80, 33 O.O.2d 442, 443, 212 N.E.2d 585, 587, we held that a bank’s act of providing “ ‘specific legal information in relation to the specific facts of a particular person’s estate’ ” constituted the practice of law and should be enjoined.

Respondent’s actions in the case before us are not as egregious as those in *Akron Bar Assn. v. Miller*(1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 6, 684 N.E.2d 288, and *Trumbull Cty. Bar Assn. v. Hanna*(1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 58, 684 N.E.2d 329. Nevertheless, as in those cases, respondent advised a person about the law, recommended a course of action, and aided her in completing legal forms. We hold that respondent, not being an attorney, was engaged in the unauthorized practice of law, and he is hereby ordered to refrain from such actions in the future. Costs are taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### § 31.10-25 Inspection covering repairs and alterations involving safety—TB/ALL.

No extensive alterations involving the safety of a tank vessel either in regard to hull or machinery shall be made without the approval of the Commandant. Before such alterations are carried out, copies of plans and specifications in triplicate for the work involved shall be forwarded to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, in whose zone the repairs will be made, for submission to Headquarters for approval. If approved one set of the plans and specifications, properly stamped and dated, shall be returned to the owner or to the repair yard designated by the owner; one set to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, who forwarded the plans and specifications to Headquarters; and one set shall be retained at Headquarters. If such plans and specifications are not approved, the Commandant shall promptly notify the owner or designated shipyard wherein they fail to comply with the regulations in this chapter. No extensive repairs to the hull or machinery which affect the safety of a vessel shall be made without the knowledge of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
#### GEORGE W. McNISH, Appellant, *v.*CARRIE A. BOWERS, Respondent.*

*Case and exceptions*— *the judge or referee must sign and order them to be annexed to the roll*— Rule 35 — *evidence must not be set forth*ia base *verba*— Rule 34.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, entered upon the trial of this action by the court without a jury.

The Court at General Term said : “ This case is not in a condition to be heard. The case and exceptions are not signed by the judge nor ordered to be annexed to the roll. (Rule 35.) The rule forbids the clerk to annex any case or exceptions to the roll unless so ordered by the judge or referee. We have uniformly insisted that this rule be observed. Besides the case contains the evidence *215
      *in Turn verba,*contrary to Rule 34, and must be re-settled in this respect.”

Case sent back for re-settlement and sighing.

*Dailey db Bentley,*for the appellant.

*Robert Stephens,*for the respondent.

Decided July, 1883.

Mem. by

Learned, P. J.

Present — Learned, P. J., Bookes and Boardman, JJ.

Case not settled. Sent back for proper settlement.
Order entered October 5, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-21-00779-CV

IN RE AN ILLEGA LLY DETAINED MINO R CHILD, ET AL. , Relators

Original Proceeding from the 305th Judicial District Court & the 193rd Judicial District Court Trial Court Cause Nos. JD-20-00900X & DC-21-10323 Dallas County, Texas
ORDER Before Justices Schenck, Nowell, and Garcia
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relators’ petition for

writ of mandamus.

/David J. Schenck / DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE
I N THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

REAPPOINTMENT TO THE
DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF
PENNSYLVANIA :

:

:

:

: NO. 304

DISCIPLINARY BOARD APPOINTMENT
DOC KET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29 th day of January, 2019, John P. Goodrich, Esquire, Allegheny

County, is hereby reappointed as a member of the Disciplinary Board of Pennsylvania for

a term of three years, commencing April 1, 2019.
#### § 4.11-5 Coercion of witnesses.

Any attempt to coerce any witness or to induce him to testify falsely in connection with a shipping casualty, or to induce any witness to leave the jurisdiction of the United States, is punishable by a fine of $5,000.00 or imprisonment for one year, or both such fine and imprisonment.
§ 42.20-55 Trunks. ( a ) A trunk or similar structure which does not extend to the sides of the vessel shall be regarded as efficient on the following conditions: ( 1 ) The trunk is at least as strong as a superstructure;
( 2 ) The hatchways are in the trunk deck, and the hatchway coamings and covers comply with the requirements of §§ 42.15-15 to 42.15-30, inclusive, and the width of the trunk deck stringer provides a satisfactory gangway and sufficient lateral stiffness; however, small access openings with watertight covers may be permitted in the freeboard deck;
( 3 ) A permanent working platform fore and aft fitted with guard rails is provided by the trunk deck, or by detached trunks connected to superstructures by efficient permanent gangways;
( 4 ) Ventilators are protected by the trunk by watertight covers or by other equivalent means;
( 5 ) Open rails are fitted on the weather parts of the freeboard deck in way of the trunk for at least half their length;
( 6 ) The machinery casings are protected by the trunk, by a superstructure of at least standard height, or by a deckhouse of the same height and of equivalent strength;
( 7 ) The breadth of the trunk is at least 60 percent of the breadth of the vessel; and,
( 8 ) Where there is no superstructure, the length of the trunk is at least 0.6*L.*
( b ) The full length of an efficient trunk reduced in the ratio of its mean breadth to *B* shall be its effective length.
( c ) The standard height of a trunk is the standard height of a superstructure other than a raised quarter deck.
( d ) Where the height of a trunk is less than the standard height, its effective length shall be reduced in the ratio of the actual to the standard height. Where the height of hatchway coamings on the trunk deck is less than that required under § 42.15-25(a), a reduction from the actual height of trunk shall be made which corresponds to the difference between the actual and required height of coaming.
[CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10065, July 12, 1968, as amended by CGFR 68-126, 34 FR 9015, June 5, 1969]
[Carroll,

June, 1879.]

#### Palmer *& a. v.*Drew.

*Pease*and Copeland, for tbe plaintiffs.

Soils, for tbe defendant.

Doe, C. J.

Tbe case having been referred with an agreement that tbe award should be final, tbe defendant is not entitled to a jury trial.

No exceptions were taken at tbe trial, and no cause appears for granting the defendant’s motion to reject tbe report.

*Judgment for the plaintiffs.*

Smith J., did not sit: tbe others concurred.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LEDELL HAMMOND,

Plaintiff, No. 15-12051

v. District Judge Paul D. Borman

Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

CITY OF TROY, ET AL.,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER

Plaintiff’s Motion for Waiver of Service Fees and Request for U.S. Marshal’s

Service [Doc. #23] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

The Court has already ordered Marshal’s service on Defendant A&M Service

Center and Towing [Doc. #15], the only Defendant that has not yet been served. The

present request for Marshal’s service is therefore DENIED AS MOOT.

However, given Plaintiff’s IFP status, the motion to waive service fees is

GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ R. Steven Whalen 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dated: February 28, 2016

-1-

2:15-cv-12051-PDB-RSW Doc # 54 Filed 02/28/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 357
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on

February 28, 2016, electronically and/or by U.S. mail.

s/Carolyn M. Ciesla 

Case Manager to the

Honorable R. Steven Whalen

-2-

2:15-cv-12051-PDB-RSW Doc # 54 Filed 02/28/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 358
#### § 30.10-21 Flammable or inflammable—TB/ALL.

The words *flammable* and *inflammable* are interchangeable or synonymous terms for the purpose of the regulations in this subchapter.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Interlink Electronics, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles C. Best, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ CHARLES C. BEST                  
|Charles C. Best                      
|Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|April 10, 2007
#### § 308.105 Reporting casualties and filing claims.

All casualties occurring after insurance under a binder has attached shall be reported promptly to the underwriting agent that issued the binder and all claim documents shall likewise be filed with such underwriting agent, but payment of the amounts due in settlement of claims will be made by the Maritime Administrator.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending January 28, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
----

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Mel G. Riggs                                  |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| Mel G. Riggs                                      |
| President and Chief Executive Officer             |
| of Southwest Royalties, Inc., the                 |
| Managing General Partner of                       |
| Southwest Oil & Gas Income Fund VIII-A, L.P.  |
|                                              |
| March 29, 2011                                    |
|                                              |
|                                              |
| /s/ Michael L. Pollard                            |
| Michael L. Pollard                                |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| of Southwest Royalties, Inc., the                 |
| Managing General Partner of                       |
| Southwest Oil & Gas Income Fund VIII-A, L.P.  |
|                                              |
| March 29, 2011                                    |