alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER YOUSIF,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 15-11027

v. Hon. Gerald E. Rosen

Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti

L.J. ROSS ASSOCIATES, INC.,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

At a session of said Court, held in

the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan

on July 7, 2015 

PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen

Chief Judge, United States District Court

On May 29, 2015, Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti issued a Report and

Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending that the Court dismiss with prejudice the

complaint filed by pro se Plaintiff Christopher Yousif, in light of Plaintiff’s failure to

appear at a scheduling conference and, more generally, his failure to prosecute the claims

he has asserted in this action. The Magistrate Judge has further recommended that

Plaintiff be ordered to pay attorney fees in the amount of $500 to Defendant L.J. Ross

Associates, Inc., as reimbursement for the time and expenses incurred by Defendant and

its counsel in defending against the claims asserted by Plaintiff.

No objections have been filed to the R & R, and the 14-day deadline for doing so

2:15-cv-11027-GER-APP Doc # 10 Filed 07/07/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 33
has passed. Upon reviewing the R & R and the record as a whole, the Court concurs in

the analysis of the Magistrate Judge, and adopts the R & R in its entirety.

Accordingly,

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s

May 29, 2015 Report and Recommendation (docket #9) is ADOPTED as the opinion of

this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the R & R, that

Plaintiff’s pro se complaint is dismissed, and that Plaintiff is ordered to immediately pay

the sum of $500 to Defendant as reimbursement for the attorney fees incurred by

Defendant in this suit.

SO ORDERED.

s/Gerald E. Rosen 

Chief Judge, United States District Court

Dated: July 7, 2015

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or

counsel of record on July 7, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Julie Owens 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5135

2

2:15-cv-11027-GER-APP Doc # 10 Filed 07/07/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 34
<PAGE>   1
                                                                             
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                          PAYLESS SHOESOURCE, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER SHARE
                       FOR THE LAST THREE FISCAL YEARS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  Jan. 31,    Feb. 1,    Feb. 3,
(Thousands, except per share)      1998        1997      1996  
                                 ----------  ---------  ---------
<S>                             <C>         <C>       <C>       
Basic Computation:

Net earnings                     $128,869   $107,702   $ 53,960

Common shares outstanding          38,443     40,220     40,365
                                 --------   --------   -------- 
Net earnings per share           $   3.35   $   2.68   $   1.34
                                 ========   ========   ========


Diluted Computation:

Net earnings                     $128,869   $107,702   $ 53,960
                                        
Common shares outstanding          38,443     40,220     40,365

Net effect of dilutive stock
options based on the treasury
  stock method                        487         87          0
                                 --------   --------   --------
Outstanding shares for diluted
  earnings per share               38,930     40,307     40,365
                                 ========   ========   ========
                                        
Diluted earnings per share       $   3.31   $   2.67   $   1.34
                                 ========   ========   ========
</TABLE>



Note: The Company's fiscal 1995 outstanding  shares was calculated on the number
of Company  shares  issued and  outstanding  as of May 4, 1996,  the date of the
spin-off from The May Department Stores Company.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1412

To require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to develop

and implement a system for determining and reporting the number

of individuals employed by non-Federal Government entities providing

services under contracts awarded by executive branch agencies.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 5, 1995

Ms. NORTON (for herself and Mrs. MORELLA) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To require the Director of the Office of Management and

Budget to develop and implement a system for determining and reporting the number of individuals employed

by non-Federal Government entities providing services

under contracts awarded by executive branch agencies.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1412 IH

1 SECTION 1. SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING AND REPORTING

2 NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS EMPLOYED IN PRI3 VATE SECTOR IN PROVIDING SERVICES

4 UNDER SERVICE CONTRACTS AWARDED BY

5 EXECUTIVE AGENCIES.

6 (a) SYSTEM.—Not later than 1 year after the date

7 of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office

8 of Management and Budget shall develop and begin imple9 menting a system for determining the number of individ10 uals employed by non-Federal Government entities provid11 ing services under service contracts awarded by agencies

12 in the executive branch of the Federal Government.

13 (b) REPORTS.—On the January 1st following imple14 mentation of the system required under subsection (a),

15 and each January 1st thereafter, the Director of the Office

16 of Management and Budget shall submit to the Congress

17 a report indicating—

18 (1) the number of individuals employed by non19 Federal Government entities providing services

20 under service contracts awarded by agencies in the

21 executive branch of the Federal Government; and

22 (2) the number of individuals employed by non23 Federal Government entities, in jobs comparable to

24 those occupied by career Federal employees, provid25 ing services under service contracts awarded by
3

•HR 1412 IH

1 agencies in the executive branch of the Federal Gov2 ernment.

3 (c) SERVICE CONTRACT DEFINED.—For the purpose

4 of this section, the term ‘‘service contract’’ has the mean5 ing given such term in part 37 of title 48, Code of Federal

6 Regulations.

Æ
§ 42.15-5 Superstructure end bulkheads. ( a ) Bulkheads at exposed ends of enclosed superstructures shall be of efficient construction and shall be to the satisfaction of the assigning authority.
[CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10060, July 12, 1968, as amended by CGFR 68-126, 34 FR 9014, June 5, 1969]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 105 (Friday, June 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30540-30541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2721]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, Oregon; Wallowa-Whitman National 
Forest Travel Management Plan

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Revised notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact 
statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On May 3, 2007, the USDA, Forest Service, Wallowa-Whitman 
National Forest, published a Notice of Intent in Federal Register (72 
FR 24558) to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) for the 
Forest Travel Management Plan. The Notice of Intent is being revised to 
change the end of the scoping period for receiving comments on the 
proposed action. The end of the scoping period was originally June 30, 
2007. The revised end of the scoping period is August 17, 2007.

[[Page 30541]]


DATES: Written comments concerning the proposed action should be 
submitted by August 17, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Stein, Interdisciplinary Team 
Leader, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, Wallowa Mountains Office, 
88401 Hwy. 82, Box A, Enterprise, OR, phone: (541) 426-5656.

    Dated: May 25, 2007
Steven A. Ellis,
Wallowa-Whitman National Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 07-2721 Filed 5-31-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending December 22, 2007

|Filer                        | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                                 
|---------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|RBC CENTURA BANK             | * Branch       | RBC Centura Bank, Raleigh, North Carolina, proposes to establish a branch at 2885 Western Boulevard, Jacksonville, North Carolina.    | Newspaper:12/31/2007Federal Register:Not applicable   
|Newspaper:                   | 12/31/2007    
|Federal Register:            | Not applicable
|UNION BANK AND TRUST COMPANY | * 18C          | Union Bank and Trust Company, Bowling Green, Virginia, to merge with Prosperity Bank & Trust Company, Springfield, Virginia.          | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                   | Not available 
|Federal Register:            | Not applicable
|VIRGINIA COMMERCE BANK       | * Branch       | Virginia Commerce Bank, Arlington, Virginia, proposes to establish a branch at 1304 Central Park Boulevard, Fredericksburg, Virginia. | Newspaper:01/08/2008Federal Register:Not applicable   
|Newspaper:                   | 01/08/2008    
|Federal Register:            | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit
      10.5






Atrion
      Corporation


Incentive
      Compensation Plan for Chief Financial Officer


for
      Calendar Years Beginning 2007










This
      plan
      provides the opportunity for the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
      (“CFO”) of Atrion Corporation (the “Company”) to receive incentive compensation
      based on the Company’s attainment of certain financial goals during each
      calendar year.  This plan supersedes and replaces the Atrion
      Corporation Incentive Corporation Plan for Chief Financial Officer for Calendar
      Years Beginning 2001, which has been terminated, and is effective for the
      calendar year 2007, and subsequent calendar years until it is modified or
      terminated.




Financial
      Goals:




The
      Company shall pay the CFO a cash bonus (the “Annual Bonus”) for each calendar
      year (with the first Annual Bonus hereunder to be paid in 2008 (within the
      period set forth below) for the year 2007) equal to the amount that is 2% of
      the
      Increase in Operating Income for such calendar year, but in no event will any
      Annual Bonus exceed 50% of the CFO’s base salary for such calendar
      year.  For purposes of this plan, “Increase in Operating Income” for a
      calendar year shall be equal to the excess, if any, of the Company’s operating
      income for such calendar year over the Company’s operating income for the
      previous calendar year.  The Compensation Committee of the Board shall
      have discretion to adjust the Increase in Operating Income calculated pursuant
      to the previous sentence to disregard one-time, non-recurring extraordinary
      items and shall make such equitable adjustments as are required to give effect
      to acquisitions, divestitures, or similar corporate transactions by or involving
      the Company.




The
      Annual Bonus for each calendar year shall be payable as soon as practicable
      following the date on which the Annual Bonus can be determined, but in no event
      later than March 15 of the year following such calendar year.
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2430 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 3, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to continue stocking 

fish in certain lakes in the North Cascades National 

Park, Ross Lake National Recreation Area, and Lake 

Chelan National Recreation Area. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

HR 2430 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. FINDINGS; PURPOSE. 

2 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 

3 (1) The North Cascades complex contains 245 

4 mountain lakes, of which 91 have been historically 

5 stocked with fish. 

6 (2) In many cases, the stocking of fish in these 

7 lakes dates back to the 1800s. 

8 (3) This practice has been important to the 

9 economy of the area because of the recreational op10 portunities it creates. 

11 (4) During congressional hearings on the des12 ignation of the North Cascades National Park, the 

13 Department of the Interior indicated that the prac14 tice of fish stocking would be continued if the area 

15 became a unit of the National Park Service system. 

16 (5) Since designation of the National Park in 

17 1968, the stocking of certain lakes has continued 

18 under various agreements between the National 

19 Park Service and the State of Washington. 

20 (6) An Environmental Impact Statement com21 pleted by the National Park Service recommends 

22 continued stocking of up to 42 of the lakes that have 

23 historically been stocked with fish. 

24 (b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to clarify 

25 the continued authority of the National Park Service to 

26 allow the stocking of fish in certain lakes in the North 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

HR 2430 RFS 

1 Cascades National Park, Ross Lake National Recreation 

2 Area, and Lake Chelan National Recreation Area. 

3 SEC. 2. STOCKING OF CERTAIN LAKES IN NORTH CAS4 CADES NATIONAL PARK, ROSS LAKE NA5 TIONAL RECREATION AREA, AND LAKE CHE6 LAN NATIONAL RECREATION AREA. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior, act8 ing through the Director of the National Park Service, 

9 shall authorize the stocking of fish in lakes in the North 

10 Cascades National Park, Ross Lake National Recreation 

11 Area, and Lake Chelan National Recreation Area. 

12 (b) CONDITIONS.—The following conditions shall 

13 apply to stocking of lakes under subsection (a): 

14 (1) The Secretary is authorized to allow stock15 ing in not more than 42 of the 91 lakes which have 

16 historically been stocked with fish. 

17 (2) The Secretary shall only stock fish that 

18 are— 

19 (A) native to the watershed; or 

20 (B) functionally sterile. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
4 

HR 2430 RFS 

1 (3) The Secretary shall coordinate the stocking 

2 of fish with the State of Washington. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 2, 2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### § 555.3 Scope.

The Commission shall take such action under this part as it considers necessary and appropriate when it determines that any laws, rules, regulations, policies, or practices of foreign governments, or any practices of foreign carriers or other persons providing maritime or maritime-related services in a foreign country, result in conditions that adversely affect the operations of United States carriers in United States oceanborne trade, and do not exist for foreign carriers of that country in the United States under the laws of the United States or as a result of acts of United States carriers or other persons providing maritime or maritime-related services in the United States.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      26,563,830
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         153,830
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            43,200,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 39,881,431
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      29,315,212
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        29,425,000
<LOANS>                                    100,132,694
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,851,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             244,820,574
<DEPOSITS>                                 216,632,486
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,392,387
<LONG-TERM>                                  2,170,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,863
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,609,838
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             244,820,574
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,502,264
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,071,114
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               546,325
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,119,703
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             814,435
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              81,559
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,223,709
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (8,735)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,295,550
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                388,231
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   224,231
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.96
<LOANS-NON>                                    527,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   833,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               839,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,802,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   10,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    36,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,851,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,851,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. MIKE SUPRENUK, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR.

Submitted May term, 1929

Decided November 14, 1929.

Before Justices Tbenchaed, Lloyd and Case.

Eor the defendant in error, *Aloysius McMahon (John Drewen,*on the brief).

Eor the plaintiff in error, *I. Faerler Goldenhorn.*

Pee Cueiam.

■ Suprenuk was convicted of carnal abuse upon a child twelve years of age. He was sentenced on January 5th, 1928. The writ of error was tested January 10th, 1929.

Counsel for the defendant below filed ten reasons for reversal but this brief merely argues the question of weight of evidence, with cursory reference to an excepted question.

Without considering the effect of the late date of issuing the writ, or the propriety of arguing the weight of evidence on a strict writ of error we have carefully examined the evidence and conclude that the verdict was not contrary to the weight thereof and that the court did not err in disallowing the question propounded by counsel for the defendant below.

The judgment below will be affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                        0000700941
<NAME>                        Advanced Remote Communication Solutions, Inc.


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-30-1999

<CASH>                          1,328,719
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   3,144,049
<ALLOWANCES>                    145,253
<INVENTORY>                     908,003
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                5,561,524
<PP&E>                          1,467,032
<DEPRECIATION>                  774,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  39,170,837
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           4,943,456
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     3,000,000
<COMMON>                        21,444,376
<OTHER-SE>                      (3,467,763)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    39,170,837
<SALES>                         9,072,673
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                9,072,673
<CGS>                           3,186,289
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   8,954,904
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                5,768,615
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              590,578
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (445,234)
<INCOME-TAX>                    32,568
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (412,666)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.02)



</TABLE>