alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Aura Systems, Inc. (the "Company")  on  Form 10-K/A for the period ended February 28, 2002 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David  A. Rescino,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  to  my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company  for the periods indicated.

  /s/ Neal F. Meehan  ------------------  Neal F. Meehan  Chairman & Chief Executive Officer  August 17, 2004
Order entered August 16, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00528-CR

JOSE GARDUNO GUZMAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219-80007-2015

ORDER

The reporter’s record has not been filed. When we notified court reporter Susan Jane 

Lindley that the record was past due, she informed us that appellant had not paid for the record.

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant 

has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any 

other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If 

the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall 

make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next 

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs 

for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the 

trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial 

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective 
representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds 

appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the 

appeal.

 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay 

in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can 

be filed. 

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact, 

any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date 

of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal 

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, 

whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
#### § 38.25-5 Removal of defective tanks—TB/ALL.

If a tank fails to pass the tests prescribed in this subpart, it shall be removed from service unless otherwise authorized by the Commandant.
#### § 57.04-1 Test specimen requirements and definition of ranges (modifies QW 202, QW 210, QW 451, and QB 202).

The type and number of specimens that must be tested to qualify an automatic, semiautomatic, or manual procedure specification must be in accordance with QW 202, QW 210, or QB 202 of Section IX of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 57.02-1) as applicable, except as supplemented by §§ 57.03-1(b) and (d).

[CGD 74-102, 40 FR 27461, June 30, 1975]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending November 15, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending November 1, 2008

|Filer              | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             | End of Comment Period                                
|------------------ | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|CAPITALSOURCE INC. | * 3A1         | CapitalSource Inc., CapitalSource TRS, Inc., and CapitalSource Finance LLC, all of Chevy Chase, Maryland, to become bank holding companies by acquiring Community Banks of Northern California, Tracy, California.  Additionally, CapitalSource Inc., CapitalSource TRS, Inc., and Capital Source Finance LLC, elect to become financial holding companies. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:         | Not available
|Federal Register:  | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
EXHIBIT 32

                               TVC TELECOM INCORPORATED

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the TVC Telecom Incorporated (the "Company") Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harley L. Rollins,
Chief  Executive  Offer and Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1). The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2). The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: April 13, 2004                        By:   /s/ HARLEY L. ROLLINS
                                                  ---------------------------
                                                   Harley L. Rollins
                                                   Chief Executive Officer and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

DATE & TIME: MONDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2015 AT 4:00 P.M.

PLACE: 999 E STREET, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. (NINTH FLOOR)

STATUS: THIS HEARING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.

ITEM TO BE DISCUSSED:

Audit Hearing: Gary Johnson 2012, Inc.

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language 

interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Shawn Woodhead 

Werth, Secretary, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the hearing date.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Signed: _______________________________

Shawn Woodhead Werth

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission

Submitted: October 26, 2015
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta

Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 7
Federal Reserve Bank of: Chicago

## Filings received during the week ending November 25, 2006

|Filer                      | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | End of Comment Period                                 
|-------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|FIRST AMERICAN BANK        | * 18C* Branch  | First American Bank, Fort Dodge, Iowa, to merge with First American Bank, NA, Naples, Florida.  As a result of this merger, all offices of First American Bank, NA, Naples, Florida, will become branches of First American Bank, Fort Dodge.                                                                  | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                 | Not available 
|Federal Register:          | Not applicable
|WISCONSIN BANCSHARES, INC. | CIC            | Notice by David R. Barnes, Racine, Wisconsin, Francesca DeRose, Racine, Wisconsin, Nicolet DeRose, Kenosha, Wisconsin, and Kari Barnes, Tigard, Oregon, to collectively gain control of Wisconsin Bancshares, Inc., Kenosha, Wisconsin, and thereby indirectly acquire Banks of Wisconsin, Kenosha, Wisconsin. | Newspaper:11/20/2006Federal Register:11/21/2006       
|Newspaper:                 | 11/20/2006    
|Federal Register:          | 11/21/2006    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location               | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------ | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|VALLEY RIDGE BK, KENT CITY, MICHIGAN | 268846 | 07/31/2006 | 11/20/2006     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for First Quarter of 2007 (January 1, 2007 - March 31, 2007)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta

Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
# C_2014071EN.01001601.xml

| 8.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 January 2014 — Progust v OHIM — Sopralex & Vosmarques (IMPERIA)

(Case T-216/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark IMPERIA - Earlier Community figurative mark IMPERIAL - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Distinctive character of the earlier mark - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

(2014/C 71/27)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Progust, SL (Girona, Spain) (represented by: initially M. E. López Camba, J. L. Rivas Zurdo, E. Seijo Veiguela and I. Munilla Muñoz, then J. L. Rivas Zurdo, E. Seijo Veiguela et I. Munilla Muñoz, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Sopralex & Vosmarques SA (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P. Maeyaert and V. Fossoul, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 January 2011 (Case R 1036/2010-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Sopralex & Vosmarques SA and Progust, SL.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Progust, SL to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Progust, SL to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 194, 2.7.2011.

---
EXHIBIT 10.2

The following officers have entered into the Form Indemnification Agreement
filed by the Company with its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2003, as of the date indicated below:

OFFICER                 DATE
----------------  -----------------

T. Gary Trimm     September 5, 2004
Warren Neuburger  September 5, 2004
Greg Wilson       February 1, 2005


<PAGE>
#### § 401.425 Provision for additional pilot.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76351, Sept. 17, 2024.

The Director, Great Lakes Pilotage Staff, U.S. Coast Guard, or the General Manager, Great Lakes Pilotage Authority, Ltd., Canada, may require the assignment of two pilots to a ship upon request of the ship or when in his judgment, because of anticipated long transit, uncommon ship size, adverse weather or sea conditions or other abnormal circumstances, the assignment of two pilots is considered necessary for the safe navigation of the ship. The Director or General Manager shall direct which of the pilots is to be in charge, as circumstances require. The charge to the ship shall be twice the appropriate charge provided for in §§ 401.405, 401.407, 401.410, and 401.420. This section does not apply to a ship in a direct transit of the undesignated waters of Lake Erie between Southeast Shoal and Port Colborne unless the ship is required by law to have a registered pilot on board in these waters.

[CGD 80-148, 46 FR 18717, Mar. 26, 1981, as amended at 61 FR 5721, Feb. 14, 1996. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 32655, June 25, 1996; 62 FR 5923, Feb. 10, 1997, and further redesignated and amended by USCG-1998-3976, 63 FR 35139, 35140, June 29, 1998]
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael C. Frederick, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as
of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                        |  |     |  |                                             
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------
|DATE: November 12, 2004 |  | BY: |  | /s/ Michael C. Frederick                    
|                        |  |     |  | Michael C. Frederick                        
|                        |  |     |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial      
|                        |  |     |  | Officer and Treasurer                       
|                        |  |     |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of  Interlink  Electronics,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, E.
Michael Thoben,  III,  Chairman,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of my
knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

/S/  E. MICHAEL THOBEN, III
----------------------------------------------
E. Michael Thoben, III
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
July 24, 2006
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with thefiling of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter Ended September 30,2005 (the “Report”) by American Medical Alert Corp. (“Registrant”), theundersigned hereby certifies that:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Registrant.

 

 
|   |   /s/ Howard  M. Siegel |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|   | Howard M. Siegel                  |
|   | Chief Executive Officer           |
|   |                              |

 

**A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Medical AlertCorp. and will be retained by American Medical Alert Corp. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

 

----
#### § 167.25-5 Inspection of boilers, pressure vessels, piping and appurtenances.

The inspection of boilers, pressure vessels, piping and appurtenances shall be in accordance with the applicable regulations in parts 50 to 63, inclusive, of Subchapter F (Marine Engineering) of this chapter, insofar as they relate to tests and inspection of cargo vessels.

[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18908, Dec. 18, 1968]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending June 9, 2007

----

EnforcementPrimebank, LeMars, Iowa  -- issuance of a consent order of prohibition against William R. Kahler, a former institution-affiliated party.					-Announced, June 6, 2007 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: June 14, 2007
Exhibit 23.2 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Interlink Electronics, Inc.: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 033-93066, 333-39371, 333-53870 and 333-107174) on Form S-8 and the registration statement(No. 333-112034) on Form S-3 of Interlink Electronics, Inc. of our report dated February 20, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Interlink Electronics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003,which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of Interlink Electronics, Inc. 

 

Very truly yours, 

 

/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

 

Los Angeles, California 

March 19, 2004
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EMILY LIVINGSTON SCOWN AND

BARBARA SCOWN,

 Appellants,

v.

THE CITY OF ALPINE, TEXAS,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00301-CV

Appeal from

394th District Court

of Brewster County, Texas

(TC # 2015-03-B0705-CV)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed for want of prosecution, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore 

dismiss the appeal. We further order Appellant to pay all costs of this appeal. We further order 

that this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2017.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 97 (Monday, May 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2532]



[[Page 28476]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, June 29, 2007.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-2532 Filed 5-17-07; 11:21 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M