alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending December 31, 2005

|Filer             | Filing Type      | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | ---------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|ORRSTOWN BANK     | Premises* Branch | Orrstown Bank, Shippensburg, PA, to establish a branch office at 201 South Cleveland Avenue, City of Hagerstown, Washington County, MD | Newspaper:12/21/2005Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 12/21/2005      
|Federal Register: | Not applicable  

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 50.05-15 Vessels subject to regulations in this subchapter. ( a ) Passenger vessels, tank vessels, cargo and miscellaneous vessels, nautical schoolships, mobile offshore drilling units, and oceanographic vessels are subject to the regulations in this subchapter to the extent prescribed by various laws and regulations as described in § 50.01-1. The applicable provisions in this subchapter apply to all such U.S. flag vessels, and to all such foreign vessels which carry passengers from any port in the United States except as follows: ( 1 ) Any vessel of a foreign nation signatory to the International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, and which has on board a current, valid Convention certificate attesting to the sufficiency of the marine engineering details as prescribed by applicable regulations in this chapter.
( 2 ) Any vessel of a foreign nation having inspection laws approximating those of the United States together with reciprocal inspection arrangements with the United States, and which has on board a current, valid certificate of inspection issued by its government under such arrangements.
( 3 ) Any vessel operating exclusively on inland waters which are not navigable waters of the United States.
( 4 ) Any vessel laid up and dismantled and out of commission.
( 5 ) With the exception of vessels of the U.S. Maritime Administration, any vessel with the title vested in the United States and which is used for public purposes.
( b ) Notwithstanding the exceptions previously noted in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section, foreign vessels of novel design or construction or whose operation involves potential unusual risks are subject to inspection to the extent necessary to safeguard life and property in U.S. ports, as further provided by § 2.01-13 in subchapter A of this chapter.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18808, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGD 73-251, 43 FR 56799, Dec. 4, 1978; CGD 80-161, 48 FR 15472, Apr. 11, 1983; CGD 90-008, 55 FR 30660, July 26, 1990; CGD 95-012, 60 FR 48049, Sept. 18, 1995]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 5 (Tuesday, January 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 951-952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-24]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Open Meeting

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs); 
DoD.

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of Public Law 92-463, The 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, announcement is made of the following 
meeting:
    Name of Committee: DoD Task Force on Mental Health, a Subcommittee 
of the Defense Health Board.
    Dates: January 22, 2007 (Morning--Open Session), January 23, 2007 
(Afternoon--Open Session).
    Times: 0800-1200 hours (22 January) 1500-1700 hours (23 January).
    Location: Sheraton Tacoma Hotel, 731320 Broadway Plaza, Tacoma, WA.
    Agenda: The purpose of the meeting is to obtain, review, and 
evaluate information related to the Mental Health Task Force's 
congressionally-directed task of assessing the efficacy of mental 
health services provided to members of the Armed Forces by the 
Department of Defense. The Task Force members will receive briefings on 
topics related to mental health concerns among military service members 
and mental health care delivery. The Task Force will hold a ``Town Hall 
Meeting'' session to hear concerns from the Fort Lewis, Tacoma, and 
Seattle metro areas Active Duty Military, National Guard and Reserve, 
and Veterans communities and conduct executive working sessions.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colonel Roger Gibson, Executive

[[Page 952]]

Secretary, Defense Health Board, Skyline One, 5205 Leesburg Pike, Suite 
810, Falls Church, VA 22041, (703) 681-3279, ext. 123.
    Section 552b(b) of Title 5, U.S.C., specifically subparagraph (1) 
thereof and Title 5, U.S.C., appendix 1, subsection 10(d). Open 
sessions of the meeting will be limited by space accommodations. Any 
interested person may attend, appear before or file statements with the 
Board at the time and in the manner permitted by the Board.

    Dated: January 3, 2007.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-24 Filed 1-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>   This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
           from the Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations included in the
           Company's Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 1998 and is
           qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1000

<S>                                           <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                Apr-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  Mar-31-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<CASH>                                              664
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5,036
<ALLOWANCES>                                      4,275
<INVENTORY>                                       7,785
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 11,799
<PP&E>                                            3,164
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1,317
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   16,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            11,969
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              3
<OTHER-SE>                                        4,121
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     16,093
<SALES>                                          17,111
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 17,111
<CGS>                                            16,367
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    16,367
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 21,491
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  104
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (20,797)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (20,797)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (1,134)
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (21,931)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (1.27)


</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2319 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make all veterans eligible 

for home loans under the veterans mortgage revenue bond program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2009 

Mr. BLUMENAUER (for himself, Mr. FILNER, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mr. 

SCHRADER, Mr. WALDEN, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. WU, Mr. KIND, Mr. 

KAGEN, Mr. AL GREEN of Texas, and Mr. YOUNG of Alaska) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 

Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

all veterans eligible for home loans under the veterans 

mortgage revenue bond program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans’ Home Loan 

5 Improvement Act of 2009’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2319 IH

1 SEC. 2. ALL VETERANS MADE ELIGIBLE FOR HOME LOANS 

2 UNDER VETERANS MORTGAGE REVENUE 

3 BOND PROVISIONS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (4) of section 143(l) 

5 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read 

6 as follows: 

7 ‘‘(4) QUALIFIED VETERAN.—For purposes of 

8 this subsection, the term ‘qualified veteran’ means 

9 any veteran who served on active duty.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 this section shall apply to financing provided after the date 

12 of the enactment of this Act under issues issued before, 

13 on, or after such date. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

**We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-03703, 333-27009, 333-28147, 333-53667, 333-85791, 333-36478, 333-40038, 333-43838, 333-67868, 333-85884, 333-109314, 333-115143 and 333-132473), on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-132663, 333-96341, 333-31342,333-59106 and 333-49180), on Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement Nos. 333-132663, 333-96341, 333-31342, and 333-59106, and on Amendments No. 2 and No. 3 to Registration Statement No. 333-59106, of our report datedMarch 30, 2007 relating to the 2006 consolidated financial statements of i2 Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of i2.**

**/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP**

**Dallas, Texas**

**March 11, 2009**
§ 28.505 Vessel owner's responsibility. ( a ) Where a test or calculations are necessary to evaluate stability, it is the owner's responsibility to select a qualified individual to perform the test or calculations.
( b ) Test results and calculations developed in evaluating stability must be maintained by the owner.
§ 502.406 Arbitration. ( a ) ( 1 ) Arbitration may be used as an alternative means of dispute resolution whenever all parties consent, except that arbitration may not be used when the Commission or one of its components is a party. Consent may be obtained either before or after an issue in controversy has arisen. A party may agree to— ( i ) Submit only certain issues in controversy to arbitration; or
( ii ) Arbitration on the condition that the award must be within a range of possible outcomes.
( 2 ) The arbitration agreement that sets forth the subject matter submitted to the arbitrator shall be in writing. Each such arbitration agreement shall specify a maximum award that may be issued by the arbitrator and may specify other conditions limiting the range of possible outcomes.
( b ) With the concurrence of the Federal Maritime Commission Dispute Resolution Specialist, binding arbitration may be used to resolve any and all disputes that could be the subject of a Commission administrative proceeding before an Administrative Law Judge. The Federal Maritime Commission Dispute Resolution Specialist may withhold such concurrence after considering the factors specified in § 502.403, should the Commission's General Counsel object to use of binding arbitration.
( c ) ( 1 ) The Federal Maritime Commission Dispute Resolution Specialist will appoint an arbitrator of the parties' choosing for an arbitration proceeding.
( 2 ) A Commission officer or employee selected as an arbitrator by the parties and appointed by the Federal Maritime Commission Dispute Resolution Specialist shall have authority to settle an issue in controversy through binding arbitration pursuant to the arbitration agreement; provided, however, that decisions by arbitrators shall not have precedential value with respect to decisions by Administrative Law Judges or the Commission. Administrative Law Judges may be appointed as arbitrators with the concurrence of the Chief Administrative Law Judge.
( d ) The arbitrator shall be a neutral who meets the criteria of 5 U.S.C. 573.
§ 174.045 Intact stability requirements. ( a ) Each unit must be designed so that the wind heeling moments (Hm) and righting moments calculated for each of its normal operating conditions and severe storm conditions, when plotted on GRAPH 174.045, define areas that satisfy the equation: Area(A)≥(K) × (Area (B)) where— (1) K = 1.4 except that if the unit is a column stabilized unit K = 1.3; (2) Area (A) is the area on GRAPH 174.045 under the righting moment curve between 0 and the second intercept angle or the angle of heel at which downflooding would occur, whichever angle is less; and (3) Area (B) is the area on GRAPH 174.045 under the wind heeling moment curve between 0 and the second intercept angle or the angle of heel at which downflooding of the unit would occur whichever angle is less.
( b ) Each righting moment on graph § 174.045 must be positive for all angles greater than 0 and less than the second intercept angle.
( c ) For the purposes of this section, openings fitted with the weathertight closing appliances specified in § 174.100(b) are not considered as openings through which downflooding could occur if they can be rapidly closed and would not be submerged below the units' waterline prior to the first intercept angle, except that ventilation intakes and outlets for machinery spaces, crew spaces, and other spaces where ventilation is normally required are considered as openings through which downflooding could occur regardless of location.
( d ) Each unit must be designed so that it can be changed from each of its normal operating conditions to a severe storm condition within a minimum period of time consistent with the operating manual required in § 109.121 of this chapter.
[CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51048, Nov. 4, 1983, as amended by CGD 83-071, 52 FR 6979, Mar. 6, 1987]
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of i2 Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sanjiv S. Sidhu, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



2.     The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



/s/ Sanjiv S. Sidhu

Sanjiv S. Sidhu

Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President

July 21, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources 

Office of the Secretary [Phone] 8o2-24i-36oo 

103 South Main Street, Center Building [fax] 802-244-iio2 

Waterbury, VT o567i-o3o1 

Ira W. Leighton -

Acting Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA Region I 

1 Congress Street, Suite 1100 

Boston, MA 02114-2023 

April 15, 2009 

Re: Revision to the Vermont State Implementation Plan To Address the 

Interstate Transport of Pollutants 

Dear Acting Regional Administrator Leighton: 

Please find enclosed a revision to the Vermont state implementation plan (SIP) to 

address the interstate transport of pollutants . This SIP revision is required to meet the 

requirements of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) of the Clean Air Act for the 8-hour ozone and 

fine particulate matter (PMZ,5) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) issued by 

the U.S . Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1997 . 

This submittal package includes all the documentation for EPA to consider these 

SIP revisions complete. I trust that EPA will find that this submittal fulfills Vermont's 

obligations under the Clean Air Act to meet the requirements of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) 

for the 1997 8-hour ozone and PM2,5 NAAQS. Should you have questions about this 

submittal, please do not hesitate to contact Richard Valentinetti, Director of Vermont's 

Air Pollution Control Division. 

Sincerely, 

Enclosure 

Jonathan L. Wood, Secretary 

Agency of Natural Resources 

Cc : Dave Conroy, Chief, Air Programs Branch, EPA Region I 

Anne Arnold, Manager, Air Quality Planning Unit, EPA Region I 

Richard Valentinetti, Director, Vermont Air Pollution Control Division 

40"'-;~ «JV IJR1V101 V 1 

Department of Fish & Wildlife . Department of Forests, Parks & Recreation . Department of Environmental Conservation
§ 172.175 Character of damage. ( a ) If a type IG hull is required, design calculations must show that the vessel can survive damage at any location.
( b ) If a type IIG hull is required, design calculations must show that a vessel— ( 1 ) Longer than 492 feet (150 meters) in length can survive damage at any location; and
( 2 ) 492 feet (150 meters) or less in length can survive damage at any location except the transverse bulkheads bounding an aft machinery space. The machinery space is calculated as a single floodable compartment.
( c ) If a vessel has independent tanks type C with a MARVS of 100 psi (689 kPa) gauge or greater, is 492 feet (150 meters) or less in length, and Table 4 of part 154 of this chapter allows a type IIPG hull, design calculations must show that the vessel can survive damage at any location, except as prescribed in paragraph (e) of this section.
( d ) If a type IIIG hull is required, except as specified in paragraph (e) of this section, design calculations must show that a vessel— ( 1 ) 410 feet (125 meters) in length or longer can survive damage at any location; and
( 2 ) Less than 410 feet (125 meters) in length can survive damage at any location, except in the main machinery space.
( e ) The calculations in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section need not assume damage to a transverse bulkhead unless it is spaced closer than the longitudinal extent of collision penetration specified in Table 172.180 from another transverse bulkhead.
( f ) If a main transverse watertight bulkhead or transverse watertight bulkhead bounding a side tank or double bottom tank has a step or a recess that is longer than 10 feet (3.05 meters) located within the extent of penetration of assumed damage, the vessel must be shown by design calculations to survive damage to this bulkhead. The step formed by the after peak bulkhead and after peak tank top is not a step for the purpose of this regulation.
Exhibit 23.1

 

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Highlands Bankshares, Inc. registration statement on Form S-3D (Registration No. 333-83618) of our report dated February 6, 2008 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, and for the periods then ended. Such report is included in the Highlands Bankshares, Inc. 2007 Annual Report to Stockholders, which is filed as exhibit 13 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

 

|   | CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS |
|--------|------------------------------|

 
|   | /s/ Brown, Edwards & Company, L.L.P. |
|--------|------------------------------------------|

 

Bluefield, West Virginia

March 27, 2008
UST Technical Compendium Category 2: 

New/Upgraded UST Systems (NUS)

NOTE: QA documents referred to in some of the following responses may be outdated. Visit The EPA 

Quality System web site for the latest version of EPA's QA documents.

Question 14: What are the monitoring/inspection requirements when using the combination of 

internal lining and cathodic protection (CP) as a corrosion upgrade option?

Answer: There are three scenarios that might occur when using this corrosion upgrade option. They 

are:

1. Applying internal lining and CP at the same time.

2. Applying CP to an UST with an internal lining.

3. Applying an internal lining to an UST with CP.

For all options, the CP system needs to be monitored in accordance with 40 CFR Part 280.31. Periodic 

inspections of the lined tank are not required if the integrity of the UST was ensured prior to the 

addition of CP. Because integrity assessment is part of the industry lining codes, this will be the case 

in scenarios 1 and 3, but not necessarily 2. For example, if CP is added to an UST that was lined 5 

years ago, but the integrity of the UST was not ensured prior to adding the CP, then periodic 

inspections of the lined tank are required.

[December 4, 1995 memorandum to State and Regional Program Managers (PDF) (4 pp, 15K)]

http://epa.gov/oust/compend/nus.htm