alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Company Ownership Verification for Dept of Water and Power the City of Los Angeles**

The Dept of Water and Power the City of Los Angeles (City of LA), requested information for the following two plants:

 Haynes Generating Station

 Intermountain Power Plant ERG completed the CBI deducibility determination for the survey using the following majority owners for these two plants:

 Haynes Generating Station (majority owner: Dept of Water and Power the City of Los Angeles)

 Intermountain Power Plant (majority owner: Intermountain Power Agency) Because the City of LA was the majority owner for the Haynes Generating Station for the CBI deducibility determination, there are no changes in ownership and the information for this plant can be provided to the City of LA.
For the Intermountain Power Plant, ERG found that the Intermountain Power Agency is a cooperative made up of a number of power consumers in Utah and California. The plant is essentially owned by the power consumers who buy it's power. The City of LA owns th e largest share of the plant and therefore, we suppose could be considered the majority owner. While this may not technically be a change in ownership, the difference in the company name could have resulted in a change in the outcome of the CBI deducibility determination. Therefore, there are risks associated with providing information for the Intermountain Power Plant to the City of LA. However, the Intermountain Power Plant is a zero discharge plant that does not have a NPDES permit. For this reason, t he response that would be provided to the City of LA for this plant would only consist of a letter stating that there are no costs for the plant. Because no data will be provided directly in response to the request, ERG does not believe that there are any CBI issues related to providing the information to the City of LA.
1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff/Respondent, 

v. 

BRYAN WATSON, 

 Defendant/Petitioner. 

 / 

Criminal Case No. 2:15-cr-20217-2 

Civil Case No. 2:20-cv-12548 

HONORABLE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III

JUDGMENT

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to the Court's order 

dated June 23, 2021, Defendant/Petitioner's claims are dismissed with prejudice. 

 KINIKIA ESSIX 

 CLERK OF THE COURT 

 

 BY: s/ D. Parker 

 Deputy Clerk 

Dated: June 23, 2021 

APPROVED: 

s/ Stephen J. Murphy, III 

STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III 

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on June 23, 2021, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. 

 s/ David P. Parker 

 Case Manager 

Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 336, PageID.8118 Filed 06/23/21 Page 1 of 1
§ 35.30-5 Fires, matches, and smoking—TB/ALL. ( a ) *General.* In making the determinations required under paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section the senior deck officer on duty, who shall be a licensed officer or certificated tankerman, shall exercise his skill and experience with due regard to attendant conditions and circumstances, including consideration for location of shore side facilities, maintenance of mobility, provision for fire protection, state or change of winds, tides, sea, weather conditions, forces of nature and other circumstances generally beyond human control.
( b ) *Boiler fires.* Boiler fires are normally permitted during cargo transfer operations: *Provided,* That prior to loading Grades A, B, and C cargoes, the senior deck officer on duty, who shall be a licensed officer or certificated tankerman, shall make an inspection to determine whether in his judgment boiler fires may be maintained with reasonable safety during the loading operation.
( c ) *Smoking.* Smoking is prohibited on the weather decks of tank vessels when they are not gas free or are alongside docks. At other times and places the senior deck officer on duty, who shall be a licensed officer or certificated tankerman, shall designate when and where the crew may smoke: *Provided,* That prior to loading Grade A, B, or C cargo the master or senior deck officer on duty shall make an inspection to determine if and where, in his judgment, smoking may be permitted with reasonable safety during the loading operation.
( d ) *Matches.* The use of other than safety matches is forbidden aboard tank vessels at all times.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16704, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGD 95-012, 60 FR 48049, Sept. 18, 1995]
2006 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 6-23-2006 

# W or th y v . N J S t at e P arole B d P r e c e de nt i al or N on-P r e c e de nt i al : N on-P r e c e de nt i al D ocke t N o . 05-2634

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2006

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a nova U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit ory

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2006 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a nova U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit ory

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c ont a ct Be n j amin . C arl s on@l a

w . vi l l a nova . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " W or th y v . N J S t at e P ar o le Bd " (2006). 2006 D e cisio n s . P ape r 845. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2006/845U N IT E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT N O . 05- 2634

________________ E M M IT T W O R T H Y , III , A ppel l ant

vs. N . J . ST A T E PA R O L E B O A R D ; W I L L I A M T . M C C A R G O , C hai r m an; JO H N D ' A M IC O , C h a irm a n ; E D W A R D J. O S K A Y , C h ief A p p e a ls U n it; R O B E R T M . E G L E S, H ear i ng O ffi cer ; G A I L SU PE R S, Super vi s orD i s t r i ct#8; D A V ID S O L T IS , S u p erv isor D istri ct #8 ; L A U R IE H O A G L A N D , P aro le O ff icer; JO H N M C C A F F E R Y , P aro le O ff icer JO H N D O E , Jo e D o e H ea ri n g O ff icers

____________________________ O n A p p ea l Fro m the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt

Fort he D i s t r i ctof N ew J er s ey ( D . C . C i v. N o. 05- cv- 01905) D i s t r i ctJ udge: H onor abl e R ober tB . K ugl er

____________________________ Be f o r e : FI SHER, ALD I SERT AN D W EI S, CI RCU I T J UD GES

OR DE R A M E NDI NG OP I NI ON A t th e d ire c tio n o f

th e C o u rt, th e o p in io n f iled Ju n e 2 0 , 2 0 0 6 is h e re b ya m e n d e d to d e lete th e stra yf

o o tn o te o n p a g e 5 o f

th e o p in io n . T h e f

o o tn o te a p p e a rs a s n u m b e r 5 in t he bodyof the opi ni on; how everi ncl us i on of a f i fth footnot e w as noti nt ended. F o r th e C o u rt, / s /M ar ci a M . W al dr on C lerk D at e: J une 23, 2006 CMH/ c c : E W, L AP
§ 167.15-30 Drydock examination, internal structural examination, and underwater survey intervals. ( a ) Except as provided for in paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section, each vessel must undergo drydock and internal structural examinations as follows: ( 1 ) If your vessel operates in saltwater, it must undergo two drydock examinations and two internal structural examinations within any 5-year period unless it has been approved to undergo an underwater survey (UWILD) under § 167.15-33 of this part. No more than three years may elapse between any two examinations.
( 2 ) If your vessel operated in fresh water at least 50 percent of the time since your last drydocking, it must undergo a dry dock and internal structural examination at intervals not to exceed 5 years unless it has been approved to undergo an underwater survey (UWILD) under § 167.15-33 of this part.
( b ) Vessels with wooden hulls must undergo two drydock and two internal structural examinations within any five year period regardless of the type of water in which they operate. No more than three years may elapse between any two examinations.
( c ) If, during an internal structural examination damage or deterioration to the hull plating or structural members is discovered, the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, may require the vessel to be drydocked or otherwise taken out of service to further assess the extent of the damage and to effect permanent repairs.
( d ) Each vessel which has not met with the applicable examination schedules in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section because it is on a voyage, must undergo the required examinations upon completion of the voyage.
( e ) The Commandant (CG-CVC) may authorize extensions to the examination intervals specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
[CGD 84-024, 52 FR 39655, Oct. 23, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 32232, Aug. 24, 1988; CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50467, Sept. 29, 1995; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50734, Sept. 27, 1996; USCG-2000-6858, 67 FR 21082, Apr. 29, 2002; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49239, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59788, Oct. 1, 2012]
§ 46.15-10 Subdivision load lines. ( a ) Subdivision load lines shall be located by measuring vertically down from the deck line required by part 42 of this subchapter.
( b ) The length, width, and manner of marking the lines shall be as provided in subpart 42.13 of this subchapter.
( c ) No subdivision load line is to be placed so that the freeboard is reduced from that determined by the highest seasonal mark permitted by part 42.
( d ) When the highest subdivision load line is located on a vessel used as a passenger vessel in a position between the highest and lowest seasonal load line marks, the seasonal load line marks above the subdivision load line will be omitted and those below will be marked.
( e ) When the freeboard from the highest subdivision load line on a vessel used as a passenger vessel is greater than the freeboard from the lowest load line permitted by part 42 of this subchapter, the load lines required by part 42 of this subchapter shall be omitted and the disk with its horizontal line located in line with the highest subdivision load line.
( f ) One fresh water line shall be marked. When a subdivision and a normal load line are combined, the normal fresh water line only shall be used unless the position of the subdivision load line is such that confusion will result, in which case a subdivision fresh water line may be used, marked FC1 and the normal fresh water line omitted.
( g ) Subdivision load lines shall be aft of the vertical line. The vertical line shall be extended as necessary to connect the lowest and highest load lines marked on the vessel.
( h ) When a vessel has spaces used for cargo and passengers alternatively so that the position of the subdivision load line varies with the service, subdivision load lines for the principal passenger condition shall be marked and denoted by C1 and the alternative conditions marked and denoted by C2, C3, etc. The position of each load line and the conditions under which a particular load line is applicable shall be noted in the certificate.
( i ) The principal passenger condition for a vessel having spaces used for passengers and cargo alternatively is the condition where only those spaces appropriated exclusively to passengers are taken into consideration for determination of the subdivision load line.
( j ) For Great Lakes vessels, references to part 42 shall read part 45 and a “diamond” shall be substituted for the “disk”. No “fresh water” line will be marked.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16769, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10077, July 12, 1968]
§ 401.600 Right to hearing. ( a ) A United States Registered Pilot, on receipt of notice from the U.S. Coast Guard that he or she has violated any regulation made pursuant to the Act, which violation the Director determines is grounds for suspension or revocation of the pilot's Certificate of Registration, shall have fifteen (15) days from the receipt of such notice in which to notify the Director that he or she elects to exercise his or her right to a hearing as to the grounds for the proposed suspension or revocation. A pilot failing to notify the Director within the prescribed period is deemed to have waived his or her right to a hearing.
( b ) A United States Registered Pilot whose application was timely filed, on receipt of notice that renewal of his or her Certificate of Registration has been denied pursuant to § 401.240(c), who fails to notify the Director within fifteen (15) days of the receipt of such notice that he or she desires a hearing, is deemed to have waived his or her right to a hearing.
[29 FR 11595, Aug. 13, 1964, as amended at 32 FR 14222, Oct. 13, 1967; 61 FR 5721, Feb. 14, 1996. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 32655, June 25, 1996, and further redesignated and amended by USCG-1998-3976, 63 FR 35139, 35140, June 29, 1998; USCG-2002-13058, 67 FR 61279, Sept. 30, 2002]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DANIEL CASEY,

Petitioner

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRENDAN PATRICK YOUNG,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 10 MM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of June, 2020, the Petition for Review is DENIED.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending June 14, 2008

|Filer                                             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                                 
|------------------------------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE FEDERATION, THE | FBSEA          | National Agricultural Cooperative Federation, Seoul, Korea, to establish a branch in New York, New York.                                           | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                                        | Not available 
|Federal Register:                                 | Not applicable
|NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED                   | FBSEA          | The National Australia Bank Limited, Melbourne, Australia, to establish a branch in Chicago, Illinois, under Section 211.24(a)(2) of Regulation K. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                                        | Not available 
|Federal Register:                                 | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<PAGE>   1
                         SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, constitutes and
appoints BRADLEY C. ANDERSON as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent
with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and his name, place
and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
fiscal year ended July 31, 2000, for filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission by Zila, Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with any and all
amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto,
and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting to such attorney-in-fact and agent, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully and to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming
that such attorney-in-fact and agent, may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

     DATED:  October 27, 2000

                                             /s/ Joseph Hines
                                             --------------------------
                                             JOSEPH HINES

STATE OF ARIZONA    )
                    )
County of Maricopa  )

     On the 27th day of October, 2000, before me, the undersigned Notary
Public, personally appeared JOSEPH HINES, known to be the person whose name
is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he executed the
same for the purposes therein contained.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.

                                             /s/ Janice L. Backus
                                             --------------------------
                                             Notary Public


My commission expires:
[seal of Janice L. Backus]

                                       EXHIBIT
                                        24-A
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory  Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Nursing Research Initial Review Group.                    

*Date:*                         June 14-15, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8:15 am. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20817.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jeffrey M. Chernak, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Review, National Institute of Nursing Research, 6701 Democracy Plaza, Suite 710, MSC 4870, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 402-6959,                         *chernakj@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.361, Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 17, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2589 Filed 5-24-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the
undersigned officer of Atrion Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to
such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.










Dated: August 3,
      2009
            /s/
      Jeffery StricklandJeffery
      StricklandChief Financial
      Officer










The foregoing certification is made
solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and not for any other
purpose.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROLAND DEMINGO QUEEN, a/k/a Mingo, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CR-95-178-WMN, CA-99-1208-WMN) Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 15, 2000 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cheryl D. Stein, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Andrew GeorgeWarrens Norman, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Roland Demingo Queen appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to alter or amend the dismissal of his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal based upon the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Queen , Nos. CR-95-178-WMN; CA-99-1208-WMN (D. Md. May 22, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DANIEL GIDDINGS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 253 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.