alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 5.19 Administrative Law Judge. ( a ) An *Administrative Law Judge* shall mean any person designated by the Commandant pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 556(b) for the purpose of conducting hearings arising under 46 U.S.C. 7703 or 7704.
( b ) The Commandant has delegated to Administrative Law Judges the authority to admonish, suspend, with or without probation, or revoke a credential or endorsement issued to a person by the Coast Guard under any navigation or shipping law.
[CGD 82-002, 50 FR 32184, Aug. 9, 1985, as amended by USCG-2004-18884, 69 FR 58341, Sept. 30, 2004; USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11214, Mar. 16, 2009]
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CAROLYN J. DAVIS a/k/a CAROLYN DAVIS and PETER S. LEVINE 

a/k/a PETER LEVINE, et al.,

Appellants,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3310

[December 13, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Martin County; William L. Roby, Judge; L.T. Case No. 16000174CAAXMX.

Brittani S. Gross, Kendrick Almaguer, and Lanzce A. Francis of The 

Ticktin Law Group, P.L.L.C, Deerfield Beach, for appellants.

Brian K. Hole and Katherine M. Joffe of Holland & Knight LLP, Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending November 25, 2006

|Filer              | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------ | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|FIRST CHARTER BANK | * 18C* Branch  | First Charter Bank, Charlotte, North Carolina, to merge with Gwinnett Banking Company, Lawrenceville, Georgia.        | Newspaper:12/16/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:         | 12/16/2006    
|Federal Register:  | Not applicable
|MONARCH BANK       | * Branch       | Monarch Bank, Chesapeake, Virginia, proposes to establish a branch at 5225 Providence Road, Virginia Beach, Virginia. | Newspaper:12/05/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:         | 12/05/2006    
|Federal Register:  | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for First Quarter of 2007 (January 1, 2007 - March 31, 2007)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal  Nos. 07-25] 

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 07-25 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: May 29, 2007.

C.R. Choate,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 31059)          ( print page 31060)          ( print page 31061)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 07-2776 Filed 6-4-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending June 23, 2007

----

Bank Branches, DomesticFirst State Bank, Conway, Arkansas  -- to establish a branch at 6039 Heber Spring Road West, Quitman.					-Approved, June 19, 2007 					

EnforcementCumberland Bank, Franklin, Tennessee  -- issuance of a consent order of prohibition against Joy McClard, a former employee.					-Announced, June 19, 2007 					Mid America Bank and Trust Company, Dixon Missouri  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis and the Missouri Division of Finance.					-Announced, June 19, 2007 					RBC Centura Bank, Raleigh, North Carolina  -- issuance of a consent order of assessment of a civil money penalty.					-Announced, June 19, 2007 					

Regulations And PoliciesCommunity Reinvestment Act  -- publication for comment of new and revised interagency questions and answers regarding community reinvestment.					-Approved, June 22, 2007 					

Testimony And StatementsConsumer Credit Reports  -- statement by Sandra Braunstein, Director, Division of Consumer and Community Affairs, before the House Committee on Financial Services.					-Published, June 19, 2007 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: June 28, 2007
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-82,652-01

EX P ARTE DAVID ROBERT ST EINER, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 722-A-C R IN THE 63RD DISTRICT COURT

F ROM TERRELL COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1

. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W

. 2 d 8 2 4 , 8 2 6 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of murder and one count of ag g rava ted assault and was sentenc ed to imprisonment for thirty y ear s on the murder counts and twenty y ears o n t h e aggra vated assault count. He did not appea l his convictions. Applicant contends, among other things, that his plea was involuntary beca use the plea ag ree ment cannot be followed. The trial court held a live evidentiar y hear ing, made finding s of fac t2

and conc lusions of law, and re commended tha t we deny relief

. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if tr u e, m i ght entitle him to relief

. Ex parte Huerta , 692 S.W .2d 681 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985). I n these c ircumstance s, additional fac ts are neede d. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court may use any means set out i n T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). I n the appropri at e ca se, the trial court may rely on its persona l

rec ollection. Id

. I f the trial court elec ts to hold a second evidentiar y hear ing and Applicant is not repr esente d by coun s el , i t s hall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f he is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to repr esent him at the hear ing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court s h al l m ak e further finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether it believes Applicant’s convictions should be set aside under Ex parte Huerta , 692 S.W .2d 681 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985). The trial court shall also direc t the District Cle rk t o fo rwa rd a copy of the repor ter’s rec ord of the evidentiar y hear ing held on April 23, 2015. The trial c ourt shall also make any other finding s o f fa ct an d conclusions of law that it deems rele vant and appropr iate to the dispositi on of Applica

nt’s claim for ha

beas c orpus re lief. This application will be held in abey ance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The i s s u es s h al l be resolved within 90 day s of this order

. A supplemental transcr ipt containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hear ing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court withi n 120 day s of t he date of t his order

. Any extensions of time shall3

be obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: Jul y

1, 2015 Do not publish
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2546 

AN ACT 

To ensure that the right of an individual to display the 

Service Flag on residential property not be abridged. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2546 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Blue Star/Gold Star 

3 Flag Act of 2010’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

5 For purposes of this Act— 

6 (1) the term ‘‘Service Flag’’ has the meaning 

7 given such term under section 901 of Public Law 

8 105–225 (36 U.S.C. 901); 

9 (2) the terms ‘‘condominium association’’ and 

10 ‘‘cooperative association’’ have the meanings given 

11 such terms under section 604 of Public Law 96–399 

12 (15 U.S.C. 3603); 

13 (3) the term ‘‘residential real estate manage14 ment association’’ has the meaning given such term 

15 under section 528 of the Internal Revenue Code of 

16 1986 (26 U.S.C. 528); and 

17 (4) the term ‘‘member’’— 

18 (A) as used with respect to a condominium 

19 association, means an owner of a condominium 

20 unit (as defined under section 604 of Public 

21 Law 96–399 (15 U.S.C. 3603)) within such as22 sociation; 

23 (B) as used with respect to a cooperative 

24 association, means a cooperative unit owner (as 

25 defined under section 604 of Public Law 96– 
3 

•HR 2546 EH

1 399 (15 U.S.C. 3603)) within such association; 

2 and 

3 (C) as used with respect to a residential 

4 real estate management association, means an 

5 owner of a residential property within a subdivi6 sion, development, or similar area subject to 

7 any policy or restriction adopted by such asso8 ciation. 

9 SEC. 3. RIGHT TO DISPLAY THE SERVICE FLAG. 

10 A condominium association, cooperative association, 

11 or residential real estate management association may not 

12 adopt or enforce any policy, or enter into any agreement, 

13 that would restrict or prevent a member of the association 

14 from displaying the Service Flag on residential property 

15 within the association with respect to which such member 

16 has a separate ownership interest or a right to exclusive 

17 possession or use. 

18 SEC. 4. LIMITATIONS. 

19 Nothing in this Act shall be considered to permit any 

20 display or use that is inconsistent with— 

21 (1) any regulations prescribed by the United 

22 States Secretary of Defense regarding rules or cus23 toms pertaining to the proper display or use of the 

24 Service Flag; or 
4 

•HR 2546 EH

1 (2) any reasonable restriction pertaining to the 

2 time, place, or manner of displaying the Service Flag 

3 necessary to protect a substantial interest of the 

4 condominium association, cooperative association, or 

5 residential real estate management association. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 19, 2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2546 

AN ACT 

To ensure that the right of an individual to display 

abridged. the Service Flag on residential property not be
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-60229 Summary Calendar

__________________ JIMMY POWELL, also known as Jamel Hobson, Petitioner-Appellant,
versus JAMES V. ANDERSON, SUPERINTENDENT, MISSISSIPPI STATE PENITENTIARY, Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:95-CV-302-BN

---------------------- October 30, 1996 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jimmy Powell, a/k/a Jamel Hobson, a Mississippi prisoner, #56327, appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus, arguing that the district court erred in dismissing all but one of his eight grounds of relief as procedurally defaulted and ruling meritless his remaining claim, that the state trial court improperlyNo. 96-60229 -2- allowed the prosecution to cross-examine him upon the confession he had allegedly involuntarily given. This court affirms for essentially the same reasons adopted by the district court. See Powell v. Hargett , No. 3:95-CV-302-BN (S.D. Miss. March 7, 1996). AFFIRMED.
t o.D sra T FS, 7 

### %tj .T qi 

### ova
R. PRO'^^

G UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, WA 98101-3140
December 5, 2013

MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Final Review: "The Kent, Seattle, and Tacoma, WA, Second 10-Year Limited

Maintenance Plan for PM to" FROM: Jeff Hunt, Air Quality Planner TO: Debra Suzuki, Unit Manager

Air Programs Unit In a letter dated November 20, 2013, from Kate Kelly, Director of the EPA Region 10 Office of Air, Waste, and Toxics, the EPA stated: We have reviewed the draft version of the Kent, Seattle, and Tacoma, WA, Second 10- Year Limited Maintenance Plan for PM, 0 to identify potential deficiencies prior to final submission for approval by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). We have concluded that the draft version sent to the EPA on September 27, 2013, would likely be approvable into the Washington State Implementation Plan. However, the EPA will make a final decision based on our review of the complete State Implementation Plan that is submitted following your public process and after consideration of any comments we receive as part of the Environmental Protection Agency public process. On November 29, 2013, the EPA received a final version of the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the Department of Ecology (Ecology). Ecology received two comments during the public comment period. The first comment related generally to the burning of coal in Asia, but did not raise issues germane to the plan. The second comment requested that Ecology expand the Kent maintenance area boundary to include their neighborhood and to revise the current episodic burn ban program to a permanent ban on wood burning. I believe Ecology's responses to both comments were appropriate and adequate, and Ecology made no changes to the final plan as a result of the comments. Based on my review of the final plan and the comments received, I recommend moving forward a proposed approval based on the sample Federal Register notice included as part of the EPA's November 20, 2013, review of the draft submission. OFFICE OF AIR. WASTE. AND TOXICS
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending April 15, 2006

|Filer                | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                          
|-------------------- | ----------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|BRIDGER COMPANY, THE | CIC         | Interagency Notice of Change in control by Karlyn B. Lohrenz Trust, Karlyn B. Lohrenz as trustee, and Karlyn B. Lohrenz as an individual, Billings, Montana, to acquire 16 2/3 percent of the shares of The Bridger Company, Bridger, Montana and join a group acting in concert which also includes Harold J. Lohrenz and Clarence G. Lohrenz. | Newspaper:04/17/2006Federal Register:04/25/2006
|Newspaper:           | 04/17/2006 
|Federal Register:    | 04/25/2006 
|JAG FINANCIAL, INC.  | * 3A1       | JAG Financial, Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of The EastBank Corporation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly acquire 100 percent of EastBank, Minneapolis, Minnesota.                                                                                                         | Newspaper:04/26/2006Federal Register:04/23/2006
|Newspaper:           | 04/26/2006 
|Federal Register:    | 04/23/2006 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 502.313 Reply of complainant.

Complainant may, within twenty (20) days of service of the answer filed by respondent, file with the Commission and serve upon the respondent a reply memorandum accompanied by appropriate affidavits and supporting documents. [Rule 313.]
§ 502.72 Dismissals. ( a ) *Voluntary dismissal.* ( 1 ) *By the complainant.* When no settlement agreement is involved, the complainant may dismiss an action without an order from the presiding officer by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer, a motion to dismiss, or a motion for summary decision. Unless the notice or stipulation states otherwise, the dismissal is without prejudice.
( 2 ) *By stipulation of the parties.* The parties may dismiss an action at any point without an order from the presiding officer by filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. In the stipulation the parties must certify that no settlement on the merits was reached. Unless the stipulation states otherwise, the dismissal is without prejudice.
( 3 ) *By order of the presiding officer.* Except as provided in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section, an action may be dismissed at the complainant's request only by order of the presiding officer, on terms the presiding officer considers proper. If the motion is based on a settlement by the parties, the settlement agreement must be submitted with the motion for determination as to whether the settlement appears to violate any law or policy and to ensure the settlement is free of fraud, duress, undue influence, mistake, or other defects which might make it unapprovable. Unless the order states otherwise, a dismissal under this paragraph is without prejudice.
( b ) *Involuntary dismissal; effect.* If the complainant fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or an order in the proceeding, a respondent may move to dismiss the action or any claim against it, or the presiding officer, after notice to the parties, may dismiss the proceeding on its own motion. Unless the dismissal order states otherwise, a dismissal under this subpart, except one for lack of jurisdiction or failure to join a party, operates as an adjudication on the merits.
( c ) *Dismissing a counterclaim, crossclaim, or third-party claim.* This rule applies to dismissals of any counterclaim, crossclaim, or third-party claim.
[79 FR 76902, Dec. 23, 2014]