alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011095EN.01001101.xml

| 26.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/11

---

Action brought on 31 January 2011 — Truvo Belgium v OHIM — AOL (TRUVO)

(Case T-77/11)

2011/C 95/17

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Truvo Belgium (Antwerp, Belgium) (represented by: O.F.A.W. van Haperen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: AOL LLC (Dulles, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 7 November 2010 in case R 923/2009-2; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 7 November 2010 in case R 923/2009-2; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘TRUVO’, for goods and services in classes 9, 16, 35, 38, 41 and 42 — Community trade mark application No 5560099

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 4756169 of the figurative mark ‘TRUVEO’ for services in class 42

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition for all the contested services in class 38 and 42, and rejected the Community trade mark application for all the contested services

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The applicant considers that the contested decision infringes Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, as well as it lacks proper motivation or is otherwise impaired to fulfil lawful demands on European Legal proceedings, as the Board of Appeal erred (i) in its comparison of the services, (ii) in its comparison of the signs, (iii) in its assessment of the relevant public, and (iv) in its assessment of likelihood of confusion.

Pleas in law:

---
§ 50.30-1 Scope. ( a ) The manufacturer must notify the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, of the intended fabrication of pressure vessels that will require Coast Guard inspection.
( b ) For exemption of certain pressure vessels from shop inspection see § 54.01-15 of this subchapter.
( c ) For a classification delineation of boilers and pressure vessels refer to tables 1 and 2 to § 54.01-5 of this subchapter.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18808, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGD 81-79, 50 FR 9431, Mar. 8, 1985]
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2443 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to preserve access to 

ambulance services under the Medicare Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2009 

Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to preserve 

access to ambulance services under the Medicare Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Ambulance 

5 Access Preservation Act of 2009’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2443 IH

1 SEC. 2. PERMANENT RETENTION TO ACCESS TO GROUND 

2 AMBULANCE SERVICES IN RURAL AND 

3 URBAN AREAS UNDER THE MEDICARE PRO4 GRAM. 

5 Section 1834(l)(13) of the Social Security Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 1395m(l)(13)) is amended— 

7 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘TEMPORARY’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) in subparagraph (A)— 

10 (A) in the matter preceding clause (i), by 

11 striking ‘‘and before January 1, 2010’’; 

12 (B) in clause (i), by inserting ‘‘, or 6 per13 cent if such service is furnished on or after 

14 January 1, 2010’’ after ‘‘2010’’; and 

15 (C) in clause (ii), by inserting ‘‘, or 6 per16 cent if such service is furnished on or after 

17 January 1, 2010’’ after ‘‘2010’’; and 

18 (3) in subparagraph (B), by adding at the end 

19 the following new sentence: ‘‘The preceding sentence 

20 shall not apply to payments for services furnished on 

21 or after January 1, 2010.’’ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2443 IH

1 SEC. 3. PERMANENT RETENTION TO ACCESS TO AMBU2 LANCE SERVICES IN SUPER RURAL AREAS 

3 UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM. 

4 Section 1834(l)(12)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 1395m(l)(12)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘and be6 fore January 1, 2010,’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 7, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-72 Lower Tribunal Nos. 19-312AP and 18-1012SP

________________ 

### All Insurance Restoration Services, Inc., etc. ,

Appellant,
vs. 

### People's Trust Insurance Company ,

Appellee. An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Lawrence D. King, Judge. Giasi Law, P.A., and Melissa A. Giasi (Tampa), for appellant. Brett R. Frankel and Jonathan M. Sabghir (Deerfield Beach); Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A. and Mark D. Tinker (Tampa), for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY, and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
#### § 380.5 Exception to procedure.

The Maritime Subsidy Board or the Maritime Administrator may dispense with the publication of notice when not inconsistent with applicable laws.
```

[House Document 107-81]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                     

107th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 107-81

 
                        DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA'S
                  FISCAL YEAR 2002 BUDGET REQUEST ACT

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                              THE MAYOR OF

                        THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

                              transmitting

THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FISCAL YEAR 2002 BUDGET REQUEST ACT, PURSUANT 
           TO PUB. L. 105-33 SEC. 11701(A)(1) (111 STAT. 780)

June 5, 2001.--Referred to the Committee on Appropriations and ordered 
                             to be printed

                         LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

                              ----------                              

                                                      May 25, 2001.
Hon. J. Dennis Hastert,
Speaker of the House, House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
    Dear Speaker Hastert: I am pleased to transmit the District 
of Columbia FY 2002 Budget Request Act and appreciate your 
willingness to expedite its review and approval. This budget 
focuses resources on the service improvements that citizens 
care most about: education, services for our most vulnerable 
residents, and neighborhood quality of life. Moreover, it sets 
a new standard for investing in critical priorities and 
maintaining fiscal responsibility.
    Also enclosed are schedules containing the FY 2002 Budget 
Request Act, the FY 2001 Approved Budget, and the variance 
between the two by agency and fund-type. I have included as 
well a schedule displaying FTE positions by agency and fund-
type. I believe this will provide sufficient information for 
the appropriate Committees to begin reviewing and analyzing the 
District's budget request. I will be transmitting the Financial 
Plan, the agency budget chapters and supporting schedules by 
June 4, 2001.
    If you have questions or concerns regarding the District's 
budget request, please contact my Director of Intergovernmental 
Relations, Darlene Taylor or our Chief Financial Office, Natwar 
Gandhi. I look forward to working with you in the coming weeks 
and thank you for your continued support of the District of 
Columbia.
            Sincerely,
                                        Anthony A. Williams, Mayor.
    Enclosures.
    
    

```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# Time and Date:

9 a.m. (Eastern Time) May 22, 2007. 

# Place:

4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. 

# Status:

Parts will be open to the public and parts closed to the public. 

# Matters To Be Considered:

## Parts Open to the Public 

1. Approval of the minutes of the April 16, 2007 Board member meeting. 

2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director. 

                    a. Monthly Participant Activity Report.                           ( print page 27572)    

b. Monthly Investment Performance Report. 

c. Legislative Report. 

3. Old Business. 

a. Annual Statement. 

b. Dormant Accounts. 

c. Automatic Enrollment & Roth Update. 

## Parts Closed to the Public 

4. Security. 

# Contact Person for More Information:

Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640. 

Dated: May 14, 2007. 

Thomas K. Emswiler, 

Secretary to the Board, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board. 

[FR Doc. 07-2440 Filed 5-14-07; 12:03 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
# C_2012065EN.01001802.xml

| 3.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/18

---

Action brought on 29 December 2011 — Sigla v OHIM (VIPS CLUB)

(Case T-673/11)

2012/C 65/34

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sigla (Madrid, Spain) (represented by E. Armijo Chávarri, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | find the present application and the accompanying documents to be duly lodged and admissible, take note that an action has been brought against the Decision of 6 October 2011 of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) in Case R 641/2011-1 and, following the appropriate procedural steps, give judgment annulling the abovementioned decision and expressly order the Office to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

find the present application and the accompanying documents to be duly lodged and admissible, take note that an action has been brought against the Decision of 6 October 2011 of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) in Case R 641/2011-1 and, following the appropriate procedural steps, give judgment annulling the abovementioned decision and expressly order the Office to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘VIPS CLUB’ for goods and services in Classes 29, 30 and 43

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Refusal to register the mark applied for

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, since the sign applied for is not descriptive and has distinctive character.

Pleas in law:

---
§ 189.25-25 Hull equipment. ( a ) At each inspection for certification and periodic inspection the inspector shall conduct the following tests and inspections of hull equipment: ( 1 ) All watertight doors shall be operated locally by manual power and also by hydraulic or electric power if so fitted. Where remote control is fitted, the doors shall also be operated by the remote control apparatus.
( 2 ) The remote controls of all valves shall be operated.
( 3 ) An examination of installed weight, handling gear and related shipboard records shall be made to ascertain the condition and suitability of the equipment for the service intended. In conducting this examination the marine inspector shall be guided by the provisions of subpart 189.35. Current valid certificates and registers, issued by a recognized nonprofit organization or association approved by the Commandant, may be accepted as prima facie evidence of the condition and suitability of the weight handling gear. Weight handling gear certificates and registers will not be issued by the Coast Guard.
[CGFR 67-83, 33 FR 1118, Jan. 27, 1968, as amended by USCG-1999-4976, 65 FR 6509, Feb. 9, 2000]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF KEVLIN CORPORATION FOR THE THREE 
MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 29, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,632
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                        82
<INVENTORY>                                      1,976
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,898
<PP&E>                                           4,864
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,799
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,724
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,253
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           313
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,013
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,724
<SALES>                                          3,430
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,430
<CGS>                                            1,997
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,997
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   935
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    527
<INCOME-TAX>                                        64
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       463
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
#### § 28.900 Post accident inspection.

The requirements for providing notice and reporting of marine casualties are contained in part 4 of this chapter. The owner of or master of the vessel shall ensure that the survey guidance provided by a Coast Guard Representative is effectively carried out, that the material and the workmanship of such repairs or renewals are in all respects satisfactory, and that the vessel complies in all respects with the regulations in this part.
# C_2008102EN.01000701.xml

| 24.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/7

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(2008/C 102/03)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 13.11.2007 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | N 211/07 |
| Member State | Hungary |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Állatjóléti körülmények javítása — baromfi ágazat |
| Legal basis | Földművelésügyi és vidékfejlesztési miniszter .../2007. ( ) FVM rendelet-tervezete a baromfi ágazat támogatásáról |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Aid for animal welfare commitments in the poultry sector |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Annual expenditure: HUF 4 000 million
  Overall budget: HUF 26 000 million |
| Intensity | 100 % of eligible costs (additional costs and income foregone resulting from animal welfare commitments) |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2013 |
| Economic sectors | Agriculture |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Földművelésügyi és Vidékfejlesztési Minisztérium |
| H-1055 Budapest, Kossuth Lajos tér 11. |

Date of adoption of the decision

13.11.2007

Reference number of the aid

N 211/07

Member State

Hungary

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Állatjóléti körülmények javítása — baromfi ágazat

Legal basis

Földművelésügyi és vidékfejlesztési miniszter .../2007. ( ) FVM rendelet-tervezete a baromfi ágazat támogatásáról

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Aid for animal welfare commitments in the poultry sector

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Annual expenditure: HUF 4 000 million

Overall budget: HUF 26 000 million

Intensity

100 % of eligible costs (additional costs and income foregone resulting from animal welfare commitments)

Duration

Until 31.12.2013

Economic sectors

Agriculture

Name and address of the granting authority

Földművelésügyi és Vidékfejlesztési Minisztérium

H-1055 Budapest, Kossuth Lajos tér 11.

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

---
10.10     Redacted Sigma Design Agreement.
siglogoblue

Professional Engineers & Designers



August 24, 2009



Mr. Meetesh Patel - President

New Energy Technologies, Inc.

3905 National Drive

Suite 110

Burtonsville MD 20866



Subject:[***]



Dear Mr. Patel;



This letter outlines our proposal for continued engineering services to develop the next prototype for the Motion Power System.



# Work Continuation and Scope:



[***]

# 

# Deliverables:[***]

[***]

[***]



The above schedule will be reviewed and updated on a bi-weekly basis. We would expect and welcome visits to our location anytime during the project.



Of course we will only invoice for the actual work performed and these estimates may change as we encounter challenges not foreseen as of this moment. When this happens we will update the estimate before starting any next stages.



Additional engineering analysis and design work approved by New Energy Technologies to support this program beyond the above scope will be charged at our normal rates.



Please contact me directly if you have any questions. We look forward to working with you on this project.



Sincerely,

Date: ________________________

Gerard%20JAccepted _______________________

1

---



Gerard J. Lynch, P.E.                                                               Meetesh Patel,

President Sigma Design Company                                           New Energy Technologies



2

---
§ 25.25-5 Life preservers and other lifesaving equipment required. ( a ) No person may operate a vessel to which this subpart applies unless it meets the requirements of this subpart.
( b ) ( 1 ) Each vessel not carrying passengers for hire and less than 40 feet in length must have on board at least one wearable personal flotation device (PFD) approved under subchapter Q of this chapter, and of a suitable size for each person on board.
( 2 ) Each vessel carrying passengers for hire, and each vessel not carrying passengers for hire and 40 feet in length or longer, must have at least one PFD approved under approval series 160.055, 160.155, or 160.176, and of a suitable size for each person on board.
( 3 ) In addition to the equipment required by paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section, each vessel 26 feet in length or longer, except for a barge to which this subpart applies, must have at least one approved lifebuoy, and each uninspected passenger vessel of at least 100 gross tons must have at least three approved lifebuoys. Lifebuoys must be approved under approval series 160.050 or 160.150, except that a lifebuoy approved under former 46 CFR 160.009 prior to May 9, 1979 (see 46 CFR chapter I, revised as of October 1, 1979), may be used as long as it is in good and serviceable condition.
( c ) ( 1 ) Each vessel not carrying passengers for hire may substitute an immersion suit approved under 46 CFR 160.171 for a wearable PFD required under paragraphs (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this section.
( 2 ) On each vessel, regardless of length and regardless of whether carrying passengers for hire, an approved commercial hybrid PFD approved under approval series 160.077, may be substituted for a PFD approved under approval series 160.055, 160.155, or 160.176, if it is— ( i ) Used in accordance with the conditions marked on the PFD and in the owner's manual; and
( ii ) Labeled for use on commercial vessels.
[USCG-2012-0919, 79 FR 53630, Sept. 10, 2014]
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statement Nos. 333-03703, 333-27009, 333-28147, 333-53667,333-85791, 333-36478, 333-40038, 333-43838, 333-67868, 333-85884, 333-109314 and 333-127722 of i2 Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form S-8, the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to registration statements Nos.333-31342 and 333-96341 and the Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to registration statement No. 333-59106 of the Company on Form S-3 and registration statement No. 333-49180 of the Company on Form S-3 of our reports relating to theconsolidated financial statements of i2 Technologies, Inc., and subsidiaries, and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of i2 Technologies, Inc. andsubsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

 

/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Dallas, Texas 

March 13, 2006