alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case No. 2:15-mc-50750 

v. Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti 

MICHAEL ABRAMS, 

 Defendant. 

__________________________/ 

ORDER SETTING 

SUPPLEMENTAL SENTENCING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 

In Objection #1 of the recently received filing titled “Defendant’s Objections 

to Sentencing,” Defendant avers that, “No evidence whatsoever was introduced by 

the prosecution during trial and no finding was made by this Court that the 

property, at which the alleged violation took place, was ‘property under the charge 

and control of GSA[,]’” quoting 41 C.F.R. § 102-74.450, which concerns penalties 

for violating any rule or regulation of this subpart. Nevertheless, the Court did find 

and state on the record at the time of conviction that the Government proved 

beyond a reasonable doubt that the violation occurred on Federal property. See 41 

C.F.R. § 102-74.390. 

2:15-mc-50750-AJT-APP Doc # 14 Filed 07/23/15 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 79
Federal Rule of Evidence 201(b) permits the Court to “judicially notice a 

fact that is not subject to reasonable dispute because it: (1) is generally known 

within the trial court’s territorial jurisdiction; or (2) can be accurately and readily 

determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.” The 

Court may do so “on its own” and “must take judicial notice if a party requests it 

and the court is supplied with the necessary information.” Fed. R. Evid. 201(c). 

Further, “The court may take judicial notice at any stage of the proceeding.” Fed. 

R. Evid. 201(d). 

As stated from the bench at the time set for sentencing today, the 

Government is directed to submit a brief on this issue as soon as possible. The 

Government may, but need not, obtain and cite from the trial transcript, but is 

asked to address the issue and supply any “necessary information” which would 

establish that it “is generally known within the court’s territorial jurisdiction” or 

“can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot 

reasonably be questioned” that the Federal property at which the violation occurred 

is “property under the charge and control of GSA.” 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 23, 2015 s/Anthony P. Patti 

 Anthony P. Patti 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

2:15-mc-50750-AJT-APP Doc # 14 Filed 07/23/15 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 80
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record 

via email and to the following addresses: 

Michael Abrams 

10500 Dix Ave. #170 

Dearborn, MI 48120 

Mollie E. O’Rourke 

211 W. Fort Street, Suite 2001 

Detroit, MI 48226 

 s/Michael Williams 

 Case Manager to the 

 Honorable Anthony P. Patti 

2:15-mc-50750-AJT-APP Doc # 14 Filed 07/23/15 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 81
§ 502.708 Decision. ( a ) Except as described in paragraph (b) of this section, the administrative law judge will issue a decision within forty (40) days after the submission of the Bureau of Enforcement's reply.
( b ) If oral hearing or argument is conducted or additional information is required, then the decision will be issued within forty (40) days after the oral proceeding or the deadline for submission of additional information, whichever is later.
( c ) The decision of the administrative law judge will be final, unless, within twenty-two (22) days from the date of service of the decision, either party files exceptions under § 502.227(a)(1) or the Commission makes a determination to review under § 502.227(a)(3) and (d). [Rule 708.]
#### § 502.286 Compulsory process.

The Commission, or its designated representative may issue orders or subpoenas directing the person named therein to appear before a designated representative at a designated time and place to testify or to produce documentary evidence relating to any matter under investigation, or both. Such orders and subpoenas shall be served in the manner provided in § 502.134. [Rule 286.]

[49 FR 44369, Nov. 6, 1984, as amended at 76 FR 10262, Feb. 24, 2011]
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.2


                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



Novo Networks, Inc.
Dallas, Texas


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-43032) from our report dated September 1, 2000,
except for Note 1(b), as to which the date is September 25, 2001, relating to
the consolidated financial statements of Novo Networks, Inc. formerly eVentures
Group, Inc. (the "Company") appearing in the Company's Form 10-K/A for the year
ended June 30, 2000. We also consent to the reference to us under the caption
"Experts" in the Re-offer Prospectus.




/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

New York, New York
February 14, 2002
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (333-161630, 333-155598, 333-147866,333-135822, 333-127716, 333-117885, 333-107700, 333-97541, 333-67480, 333-45736, 333-86091, 333-57573, 333-32161) of IRIDEX Corporation of our report dated March 31, 2010 related to the financial statements and financial statement schedules asof January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009 and for each of the three years in the period ended January 2, 2010 which appear in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. 

San Francisco, California 

March 31, 2010
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 9 (Thursday, January 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 2439]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-808]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7299]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Rembrandt and His School: Masterworks From The Frick 
and Lugt Collections''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Rembrandt and His School: Masterworks from 
The Frick and Lugt Collections,'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with a foreign owner 
or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at The Frick Collection, New York, NY, from on or about 
February 15, 2011, until on or about May 22, 2011, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 11, 2011.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-808 Filed 1-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 6, 2016

d0829

Order 

Clerk

September 6, 2016

150569(87)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150569

COA: 316063

Wayne CC: 12-008623-FC

ERIC MELVIN SULLIVAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s April 25, 

2016 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF COMPOST AMERICA HOLDING COMPANY, INC. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
APRIL 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                           8,012
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,089
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               207,219
<PP&E>                                      16,631,081
<DEPRECIATION>                                 133,547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,237,819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,468,079
<BONDS>                                      1,942,911
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,611,169
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,237,819
<SALES>                                        147,666
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               147,666
<CGS>                                           10,803
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,803
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,007,790
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,166,082
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,037,209)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,921,603)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,921,603)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.31)
        

</TABLE>
#### Louisa C. Smith, *Appellant, v.*James Mooney, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.
#### § 174.225 Hull penetrations and shell connections.

Each overboard discharge and shell connection except an engine exhaust must comply with §§ 56.50-95 and 128.230 of this chapter.
§ 504.6 Finding of no significant impact. ( a ) If upon completion of an environmental assessment, it is determined that a potential or proposed action will not have a significant impact on the quality of the human environment of the United States or of the global commons, a finding of no significant impact shall be prepared and notice of its availability published in the Federal Register. This document shall include the environmental assessment or a summary of it, and shall briefly present the reasons why the potential or proposed action, not otherwise excluded under § 504.4, will not have a significant effect on the human environment and why, therefore, an environmental impact statement (EIS) will not be prepared.
( b ) Petitions for review of a finding of no significant impact must be received by the Commission within ten (10) days from the date of publication of the notice of its availability in the Federal Register. The Commission shall review the petitions and either deny them or order prepared an EIS pursuant to § 504.7. The Commission shall, within ten (10) days of receipt of the petition, serve copies of its order upon all parties who filed comments concerning the potential or proposed action or who filed petitions for review.
[64 FR 23549, May 3, 1999]
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Exemption # 9532B
EXHIBIT
32.2











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the
undersigned officer of National Penn Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") hereby
certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
            November
      6, 2009
            
            By:
            /s/
      Michael J. HughesName:
            Michael
      J. HughesTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer











The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and not for any other
purpose.
#### § 703.10 Public availability of documents and other materials.

Part 704 of this chapter shall be applicable to reports, publications, and other materials prepared by or for Advisory Committees.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending January 7, 2006

|Filer                             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                                 
|--------------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|ANGLO IRISH BANK CORP.,PLC        | FBSEA          | Notification by Anglo Irish Bank Corporation plc, Dublin, Ireland to incorporate its existing Boston and New York representative offices.                                                                                                                                                    | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                        | Not available 
|Federal Register:                 | Not applicable
|Meridian Interstate Bancorp, Inc. | * 3A1          | Meridian Interstate Bancorp, Inc., East Boston, Massachusetts, to become a mid-tier stock bank holding company of Meridian Financial Services, Inc., East Boston, Massachusetts, by acquiring East Boston Savings Bank, East Boston, Massachusetts, pursuant to sections 3(a)(1) and 3(a)(3) | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:02/06/2006    
|Newspaper:                        | Not available 
|Federal Register:                 | 02/06/2006    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Startup and Shutdown procedures

robert.j.morehouse to: Nick Parsons, Penny Lassiter 03/17/2011 01:03 PM

Cc: Ken Hustvedt, Freshairconsult

History: This message has been replied to and forwarded.

1 attachment

 P&R1 SS Response 3-17-11 to EPA.doc 

Penny and Nick: Following up on your recent questions , attached are some

recommended procedures for P&R 1 startups and shutdowns for your

consideration.

Bob

(See attached file: P&R1 SS Response 3-17-11 to EPA.doc)

Bob Morehouse

ExxonMobil

Office: 281-870-6524; Cell: 281-384-5390

robert.j.morehouse@exxonmobil.com
# C_2014093EN.01001001.xml

| 29.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 February 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Székesfehérvári Törvényszék — Hungary) — Hervis Sport- és Divatkereskedelmi Kft v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Közép-dunántúli Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága

(Case C-385/12) (1)

1

(Request for a preliminary ruling - Direct taxation - Freedom of establishment - National tax legislation establishing an exceptional tax on the turnover of store retail trade - Retail store chains - Existence of a discriminatory effect - Indirect discrimination)

2014/C 93/15

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Székesfehérvári Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Hervis Sport- és Divatkereskedelmi Kft

Applicant:

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Közép-dunántúli Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Székesfehérvári Törvényszék — Interpretation of Articles 18 TFEU, 26 TFEU, 49 TFEU, 54 TFEU, 55 TFEU, 56 TFEU, 63 TFEU, 65 TFEU and 110 TFEU — National tax legislation creating a special tax on the store retail trade sector — Progressive tax calculated on the basis of net turnover — Threshold tax rate resulting in greater impact on retail food trade undertakings owned by foreigners than on those owned by nationals.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 49 TFEU and 54 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State relating to tax on the turnover of store retail trade which obliges taxable legal persons constituting, within a group, ‘linked undertakings’ within the meaning of that legislation, to aggregate their turnover for the purpose of the application of a steeply progressive rate, and then to divide the resulting amount of tax among them in proportion to their actual turnover, if — and it is for the referring court to determine whether this is the case — the taxable persons covered by the highest band of the special tax are ‘linked’, in the majority of cases, to companies which have their registered office in another Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 366, 24.11.2012.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel,  June 7, 2007, 8 a.m. to June 7, 2007, 5 p.m. DoubleTree Hotel-Washington, DC, 1515 Rhode Island Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20005  which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 9, 2007, 72 FR 26411-26412.                

The meeting will be held June 7, 2007, 8 a.m. to June 8, 2007, 5 p.m. The meeting location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: May 14, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2486 Filed 5-18-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C_2013225EN.01003801.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/38

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 June 2013 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-345/12) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2002/91/EC - Energy performance of buildings - Article 7(1) and (2), Article 9, Article 10 and Article 15(1) - Incorrect transposition - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period - Directive 2010/31/EU - Article 29)

2013/C 225/64

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: E. Montaguti and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, Agent, and by A. De Stefano, avvocato dello Stato)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure to fulfil obligations — Failure to have taken, within the prescribed period, all the provisions necessary to comply with Article 7(1) and (2), Article 10 and Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings (OJ 2003 L 1, p. 65), read in conjunction with Article 29 of Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings (OJ 2010 L 153, p. 13)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to lay down an obligation to present, when buildings are sold or rented out, an energy performance certificate, in accordance with Articles 7 and 10 of Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings, and in having failed to notify the European Commission of the measures transposing Article 9 of Directive 2002/91, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7(1) and (2), Article 10 and Article 15(1) of that directive, read in conjunction with Article 29 of Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to lay down an obligation to present, when buildings are sold or rented out, an energy performance certificate, in accordance with Articles 7 and 10 of Directive 2002/91/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2002 on the energy performance of buildings, and in having failed to notify the European Commission of the measures transposing Article 9 of Directive 2002/91, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7(1) and (2), Article 10 and Article 15(1) of that directive, read in conjunction with Article 29 of Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 287, 22.9.2012.

1

---