Index | Site       Map | FAQ | Facility       Info | Reading       Rm | New | Help | Glossary | Contact UsProtecting People and the EnvironmentUNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION -   About NRC    - The     Commission 
  - Statutory Authority 
  - Strategic Plan 
  - Budget &      Performance 
  - Organization & Functions 
  - Locations 
  - History 
  - Values 
  - Policymaking 
  - Radiation Protection 
  - Fire Protection 
  - How We Regulate 
  - Grants 
  - Civil Rights 
  - 
- NuclearReactors    - Operating Reactor Locations 
  - Reactor Quick Links 
  - Power Reactors 
  - Research and Test     Reactors 
  - Operating Reactors 
  - Operator Licensing 
  - New Reactors 
  - Operator     Licensing for New Reactors 
  - Reactor Safety Research 
  - Advisory Comm (ACRS) 
  - Decommissioning     of Nuclear Facilities 
  - 
- NuclearMaterials    - Fuel Cycle Facility Locations 
  - Uranium     Recovery Locations 
  - Materials Quick Links 
  - Special Nuclear Material 
  - Source Material 
  - Byproduct Material 
  - Med, Academic & Ind Uses 
  - Source Materials Facilities 
  - Uranium Recovery 
  - Fuel Cycle Facilities 
  - Materials     Transportation 
  - Materials Research 
  - Advisory Comm (ACMUI) 
  - Decommissioning     of Nuclear Facilities 
  - Materials     Environmental Reviews 
  - 
- RadioactiveWaste    - Waste Quick Links 
  - Low-Level Waste 
  - Waste Incidental to     Reprocessing 
  - Incidental Waste Criteria 
  - High-Level Waste 
  - Uranium Mill Tailings 
  - LLW Disposal 
  - HLW Disposal 
  - Spent Fuel Storage 
  - Spent Fuel Transport 
  - Waste Research 
  - 
- NuclearSecurity    - Security     Spotlight 
  - NRC     Responsibilities 
  - Domestic Safeguards 
  - Radioactive Material Security 
  - Facility Protection 
  - Nuclear Material Control 
  - International Safeguards 
  - Information Security 
  - Emergency     Preparedness 
  - &; 
- Public Meetings&   Involvement    - Public Meeting Schedule 
  - Commission     Schedule 
  - Conferences & Symposia 
  - Documents for Comment 
  - Brochures & Fact Sheets 
  - Involving Stakeholders 
  - Info Quality Guidelines 
  - Rulemaking Process 
  - Licensing 
  - Enforcement 
  - Hearing Process 
  - Hearing Applications 
  - 

Home       > Electronic Reading       Room       > Document       Collections       > General       Communications       > Information       Notices       > 2000       > IN 2000-04

UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONOFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONOFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDSOFFICE OF ENFORCEMENTWASHINGTON, D.C. 20555

February 25, 2000
NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2000-04:   1999 ENFORCEMENT SANCTIONS FOR DELIBERATE VIOLATIONS OF NRC       EMPLOYEE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS- Addressees 
- Purpose 
- Discussion 
- Significant   1999 Enforcement Actions and Sanctions 
Addressees
All U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission licensees.
Purpose
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to remind licensees and their employees of the sanctions that could result from deliberately violating NRC Employee Protection requirements. Licensees are expected to review this information notice, distribute it to management and staff involved in licensed activities, including senior management at nuclear power plants, fuel cycle facilities, and byproduct materials facilities and consider appropriate actions to avoid similar problems. No written response is required.
Discussion
The NRC places a high value on nuclear industry employee's freedom to raise potential safety concerns both to licensee management and to the NRC without fear of reprisal or actual harassment and intimidation. Section 211 of the Energy Reorganization Act (ERA), as amended and 10 CFR 19.20, 30.7, 40.7, 50.7, 60.9, 61.9, 70.7, 72.10, and 76.7 provide that no employer may discharge or otherwise discriminate against any employee with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because the employee engaged in certain protected activities. These protected activities include notifying an employer of an alleged violation of the Atomic Energy Act or the ERA, refusing to engage in any practice made unlawful by those acts, testifying before Congress or in a Federal or State proceeding regarding any provision of these acts, or commencing, testifying, assisting, or participating in any manner in a proceeding under these acts. Licensees and contractors are responsible for ensuring that they do not discriminate against their employees for engaging in such protected activities. Licensees and contractors that discriminate against their employees who engage in protected activities are subject to sanctions by the NRC. These sanctions include notices of violation (NOVs) and civil penalties (CPs).

In addition, under the Deliberate Misconduct Rule (see 10 CFR 30.10 and 10 CFR 50.5) licensee and contractor employees, including senior managers, are subject to sanctions by the NRC for discrimination against other employees who engage in protected activities. These sanctions include orders barring individuals from NRC licensed activities. Significant NRC enforcement actions are published in NUREG-0940 and can be accessed through the NRC Office of Enforcement's home page at /about-nrc/regulatory/enforcement.html. The NRC enforcement policy accessed through this home page explains the sanctions in more detail.
Significant 1999 Enforcement Actions and Sanctions- On March 9, 1999, the NRC issued a Severity Level II NOV and proposed CP   in the amount of $88,000 to Northeast Nuclear Energy Company in connection   with a violation of Section 50.7 at the Millstone Station in August 1997   (enforcement action (EA) 97-461). The action was based upon a violation   involving discrimination against two contract employees at Millstone's Motor   Operated Valve (MOV) Department. Their terminations were recommended by the   then MOV supervisor and supported by the then MOV Manager, both of whom were   also contract employees. Although each termination constituted a separate   instance of discrimination, the staff combined the terminations into one   violation. The licensee paid the civil penalty on March 31, 1999.     
- On April 6, 1999, the NRC issued a Severity Level II NOV to Northeast   Nuclear Energy Company for Section 50.7 violations associated with the   demotion of two supervisors during a November 1993 reorganization, and the   termination of an electrical engineering supervisor in the Engineering   Services Department at Millstone Unit 2 in August 1995 (EA 98-325).     
- On April 6, 1999, the NRC issued a Severity Level II NOV to the vice   president for nuclear engineering services at Northeast Nuclear Energy   Company's Millstone Station (individual action (IA) 99-012). The finding was   based on an investigation which concluded that the vice president had   discriminated against a supervisor in the Performance Engineering group and a   supervisor in the Engineering Mechanics group at Millstone because of their   involvement in protected activities (see paragraph 2 above).     
- On May 20, 1999, the NRC issued a Severity Level II NOV and proposed CP in   the amount of $110,000 in connection with a Section 50.7 violation in July   1997 at First Energy Nuclear Operating Company's Perry Nuclear Power Plant (EA   99-012). The action is based upon a violation involving a Perry radiation   protection manager who discriminated against a radiation protection supervisor   for engaging in protected activities. The manager had orally counseled the   supervisor the day before the supervisor's scheduled deposition in a   Department of Labor matter and placed a memorandum documenting the counseling   session in the supervisor's personnel file.     
- On June 2, 1999, the NRC issued a Severity Level II NOV and proposed CP in   the amount of $4,400 to Corielle Institute for Medical Research (EA 99-060).   The action is based on a violation of 10 CFR 30.7 for discrimination against a   lab technician. The technician was terminated after raising safety concerns to   his management and the NRC regarding unnecessary exposure to employees from   the use of P-32 in a laboratory. The licensee responded and paid the civil   penalty on June 23, 1999.     
- On July 28, 1999, the NRC issued a Severity Level IV NOV to Public Service   Electric and Gas Company (EA 99-055). The action is based on a violation of 10   CFR 50.7 for discrimination against a nuclear mechanical technician. The   technician received a negative performance appraisal in retaliation for   raising safety concerns about the repair of a safety-related valve.     
- On August 3, 1999, the NRC issued a Severity Level III NOV and proposed CP   in the amount of $55,000 to North Atlantic Energy Services Corporation's   (NAESC) Seabrook facility (EA 98-165). The action is based on a violation of   10 CFR 50.7: a licensee contractor discriminated against a contract   electrician because of the electrician's involvement in protected activity.   Specifically, the contractor electrician was selected for layoff on January   16, 1998, at least in part, because he had raised a concern to the licensee's   quality control inspector on January 7, 1998. The concern regarded a wiring   discrepancy in the control panel of the control building air-conditioning   system. The licensee replied and paid the civil penalty on September 2, 1999.     
- On August 3, 1999, the NRC issued a Severity Level III NOV (EA 98-338) to   Williams Power Corporation (WPC) for the discrimination described in paragraph   7 above. The action is based on a violation of 10 CFR 50.7: the WPC   discriminated against a WPC electrician for raising a concern about a wiring   discrepancy in a control panel.     
- On August 3, 1999, the NRC issued a Severity Level III NOV (IA 99-003) to   the WPC foreman who engaged in the deliberate misconduct that caused NAESC to   be in violation of 10 CFR 50.7 by discriminating against an electrician   employed by WPC at NAESC's Seabrook facility (see paragraph 7 above).     
-  On September 24, 1999, the NRC issued a confirmatory order (effective   immediately) to Morrison Knudsen Corporation (MK), a construction engineering   firm engaged in activities at multiple reactor and nuclear materials   facilities (EA 98-081). The order also encompassed MK's affiliate, SGT, LLC .   The enforcement action was based on the results of an NRC investigation which   concluded that MK had discriminated against a corporate group welding engineer   (GWE) for raising safety concerns. Specifically, the investigation concluded   that MK removed the corporate GWE from his position and transferred him to an   MK project in Parkersburg, WV, as a site welding engineer, after he delivered   adverse reports to MK management about the quality of welding procedures used   by MK to replace steam generators at the Point Beach and D.C. Cook nuclear   power plants.  The confirmatory order requires, in part, that MK and SGT, LLC: (1) hire an   independent consultant to conduct audits, to review their employees concerns   programs, and to train supervisors and managers; (2) conduct annual mandatory   continuing training programs; (3) integrate a cultural assessment survey   developed by the consultant into its overall program for improving the work   environment and safety culture; and (4) post Section 211 "Confirmatory Order",   of the Energy Reorganization Act, as amended, and NRC Form 3 to inform their   employees of the confirmatory order, and their right to raise safety concerns   to management and the NRC without fear of retaliation.   
- On September 30, 1999, the NRC issued a Severity Level III NOV to Illinois   Power Company for a violation of Section 50.7 at the Clinton Power Station in   January 1997 (EA 98-464). The action was based upon a violation by a   supervisor in the Quality Verification (QV) Department who discriminated   against a QV inspector for having engaged in protected activities.   Specifically, in 1994 the QV inspector had provided information to the NRC on   potential violations nuclear safety. As a result, the QV supervisor did not   recommend the QV inspector for promotion to lead QV inspector.     
- On September 30, 1999, the NRC issued a Severity Level III NOV to the QV   manager at Illinois Power Company's Clinton Power Station (IA 99-045). The   finding was based on an investigation concluding that the QV manager had   discriminated against a QV inspector thus violating 10 CFR 50.7 (see paragraph   11 above).     
- On November 3, 1999, the NRC issued a Severity Level II NOV and proposed   CP in the amount of $110,000 to Commonwealth Edison Company in connection with   a violation of Section 50.7 at the Zion Generating Station (EA 98-518). The   action was based upon a violation involving the actions of a shift operations   supervisor (SOS). The SOS discriminated against a senior reactor operator   (SRO) who had recommended on October 14, 1997, that a component water pump be   removed from service to troubleshoot an oil leak and who had raised a safety   concern about the performance of a safety-related diesel generator   load-sequencing timer. The SOS deferred the SRO's participation in the shift   manager qualification process (which a prior SOS had previously instructed him   to begin) and, on October 24, 1997, lowered the SRO's performance appraisal   which had been prepared by the SRO's shift manager.     
- On November 3, 1999, the NRC issued a Severity Level II NOV to the SOS for   a violation involving discrimination against an SRO at Commonwealth Edison   Company (IA 99-052) (see paragraph 13 above).     
- On December 20, 1999, the NRC issued a Severity Level II NOV and proposed   imposition of civil penalty in the amount of $88,000 to the United States   Enrichment Corporation (USEC)(EA 99-110). The action is based on a violation   involving a manager of safety, safeguards, and quality who discriminated   against a quality systems (QS) manager for engaging in a protected activities.   Specifically, the QS manager had engaged in protected activities regarding the   lack of completeness in the Paducah plant quality assurance plan (QAP). In   addition, the QS manager asserted that non-QAP-related activities were   negatively impacting his group's responsibilities, as outlined in the QAP. In   part, because of these protected activities, the QS manager was transferred to   a non-managerial training department position.     
- On December 20, 1999, the NRC issued a Severity Level II NOV to the USEC   manager of safety, safeguards, and quality for deliberate misconduct that   caused USEC to be in violation of 10 CFR 76.7(a) (IA 99-059). The misconduct   involved his discrimination against the QS manager for that manager having   engaged in protected activities (see paragraph 15 above). 

No specific action or written response is required by this information notice. If you have any questions about this matter, please call the contact listed below or the appropriate NRC regional office.
/RA/Donald A. Cool, DirectorDivision of       Industrial and Medical Nuclear SafetyOffice of Nuclear Material Safety       Programs and Safeguards/RA/Ledyard B. Marsh, DirectorEvents Assessment, Generic       Communications and Non-Power Reactors BranchDivision of Regulatory       ImprovementOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationContact:Michael Stein, OE 301-415-1688 E-mail:   mhs@nrc.govAttachments:1. List of Recently Issued NMSS Information Notices2. List of       Recently Issued NRC Information Notices(ADAMS Accession Number ML003679856)