P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that th i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shedan d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e li m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNITED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 10277 C on soli d a tedw i th N o. 08- 10279 Su m m ar y Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t if f

- A pp el l ee
v. BI LLYW AY N E FA RR I S D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp eal s f

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or th e N ort h ernD i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 3 : 0 7
- CR- 3 1 3
- ALL U SDC N o . 3 : 0 7
- CR- 3 2 7
- ALL
B e fo r e G A R Z A , D e M O S S , a n dC L E M E N T , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R IAM: * B illyW a y n e F a r r is a p p e a ls h is g u ilty p le a c o n v ic tio n s o f b a n k r o b b e r y , in v i o l a t i o n o f 1 8 U .S .C . § 2 1 1 3 (a ). F a r r is a r g u e s th a t t h e d is tr ic t c o u r t p la in ly erred w h en itapp l i ed the ca re e r of fen der enh an cem en tbecau se hi s pri or A rkan sas aggrava t ed robbery conv i ct i on di d n otqu al if y as a cri m e of

vi ol en ce, United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I LE D Februar y 23, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o . 0 8 -1 0 2 7 7 c/w N o. 08- 10279

2 t h e sentence i s un reasona bl e becau se th e d i st ri ctcou rtrel i ed excl u sivel y u pon F a rris’ a rres t reco rd w h en sen ten ci n g F a rris to 1 8 8 m on th s o f im p ri son m en t, w hi c h w as w i t hi n t he G ui deli nes r ange, and t he di st r i c tc our tpl ai nl y e r r ed by orderi n g t h at Fa rri s’sentence ru n con secutive t o stat e sen t en ces t h at w ere not ye ti m po s e d. Al t ho ught he di s t r i c tc o ur tr e l i e d s o l e ly upo n t he pr e s e nt e nc e r e po r ta nd t h u s di d n otrely u pon t h e proper docu m en t ati on w h en determ i n i n g t h at Fa rri s’ p r io ro ffe n s e w a s a c r im e o f v io le n c e , see Un i t ed Stat es v. G arza-Lop ez , 410 F. 3d 26 8, 2 74( 5th Ci r . 2 00 5) , t he G o ve r nm e nt has s upp l e m e nt e d t he r e c o r d wi t h t he c h a r g in gd o c u m e n t a n dth e ju d g m e n t o f c o n v ic tio n . F a r r is ’a r g u m e n t t h a t t h is c o u r t d o e s n o t h a v e a u th o r ity t o s u p p le m e n t t h e re c o r dis w ith o u t m e r it. S ee, e . g. , Uni t e d St at e sv . Fe r nandez - C u sco , 4 4 7 F .3d3 8 2 , 3 8 6 -8 7 (5t h C ir. 2 0 0 6 ). Farr i s’c onvi c t i o n un d e rtheA r kansas aggr avat ed r obbe r y s t at ut e, A
. C
. A
. § 5- 12- 103 , qu al if

i es as a c ri m e of

vi ol en ce b e ca u se th e A rkan sas aggrava t ed robbery st atute, li ke the A rkan sas robb ery st atute, cor respond s t o t h e gen eri c, con tem p ora rym ea n i n g o f rob b eryas iti n vo lve s m i sa p p rop ri a ti on of p rop e r ty u n d e rcir c u m s ta n c e s in v o lv in gd a n g e rto a n o th e rp e r s o n . SeeUni t e d S t at e sv. Sant i e s t e ba n , 4 6 9 F .3 d3 7 6 , 3 7 8 -8 2 & n .5 (5 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ); Un i t ed Stat es v. T el lezMart i n ez, 51 7 F
. 3 d81 3 , 81 4 -15 ( 5 thC i r. ), ce rt. den i ed , 1 2 9 S
. C t. 1 7 0 (20 0 8 ). T h e di st ri ctcourtt h eref ore di d n o t errw h en itapp l i ed the career of fen der e n h a n c e m e n t. S eeU .S .S .G
. § 4 B 1 .1(a ), § 4 B 1 .2 c m t. n .1 (2 0 0 7 ). A ls o , F a r r is ’a s s e r tio n th a t th e d is tr ic t co u r t “e x c lu s iv e ly” r e lie du p o n h is pr i o rarre s tr e c o r d t o de t e r m i ne hi s s e nt e nc e m i s c har ac t e r i z e s t he r e c o r d. R eg a rd l ess w h eth er a n arre st record i s an irrelev a n t o rim p rop er factor to c ons i derw hen det er m i ni ng w her e w i t hi n a pr ope r ly c al c ul at ed g ui deli nes r ange a s e nt e nc e s ho ul d fall , i n t hi s c as e t he di s t r i c tc o ur tpr o vi de d e xt e ns iver e as o ns ex p l a i n i n g its sen ten ci n g d ecisi on . O u r rea d i n g o f th e rec ordi n d i ca tes th a t, a lth o u g h th e d is tr ic t co u r t m e n tio n e dF a r r is ’a r r e s t r e c o r d , th e d is tr ic t c o u r t d idN o . 0 8 -1 0 2 7 7 c/w N o. 08- 10279

3 n ot ex cl u sively rely u p on th e arres t recordan ddidn ot give si gn ifica n t w eigh t t o th e a rres t record
. F a rris h a s n ot sh ow n tha t th e d i stri ct c o u rt ab u sedits d is c r e t i o n b yim p o s in gas e n te n c e w ith in th e a d v is o r yg u id e lin e s ra n g e . S ee Un itedS tate s v. C i sneros- G u t i errez , 5 1 7 F .3 d7 5 1 , 7 6 4 (5 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ); Un i t ed St at e sv. Ni konov a , 4 8 0 F .3 d 3 7 1 , 3 7 6 (5 t h C i r .) , cer t . den i ed , 128 S. C t . 163 (2 0 0 7 ). F in a lly , a s F a r r is c o n c e d e s , h is a r g u m e n t t h a t t h e d is tr ic t c o u r t p la in ly erred by orderi n g t h at hi s sen t en ce run consecutive t o st ate s en t en ces t h at w ere notye ti m pos ed i s f

or ec l os ed by Un i t e dS t a t e sv . B ro wn , 920 F. 2d 1212, 1216- 17 (5 th C ir . 1 9 9 1 ), a b roga tedo n o th erg ro u n d s byUn itedS ta tes v . Ca n d ia , 454 F. 3d 4 6 8 , 4 7 2 -7 3 (5 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ). AF F I RMED.