alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                    MAXUS REAL PROPERTY INVESTORS-FOUR, L.P.

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Maxus Real Property  Investors-Four,
L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending August 31, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, John W. Alvey,  Vice  President,  Chief  Financial and Accounting
Officer of Maxus Capital Corp.,  General  Partner of the  Partnership,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Partnership  as of August 31,  2004 (the last date of the period  covered by the
Report).


/s/ John W. Alvey
-----------------
John W. Alvey
Vice President, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer of
Maxus Capital Corp.,
General Partner of the Partnership
October 4, 2004
#### § 502.134 Service of subpoenas.

If service of a subpoena is made by a United States marshal, or his or her deputy, or an employee of the Commission, such service shall be evidenced by his or her return thereon. If made by any other person, such person shall make affidavit thereto, describing the manner in which service is made, and return such affidavit on or with the original subpoena. In case of failure to make service, the reasons for the failure shall be stated on the original subpoena. In making service, the original subpoena shall be exhibited to the person served, shall be read to him or her if he or she is unable to read, and a copy thereof shall be left with him or her. The original subpoena, bearing or accompanied by required return, affidavit, or statement, shall be returned without delay to the Commission, or if so directed on the subpoena, to the presiding officer before whom the person named in the subpoena is required to appear. [Rule 134.]

[49 FR 44369, Nov. 6, 1984, as amended at 76 FR 10262, Feb. 24, 2011]
**EXHIBIT ITEM 32.2**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

April 11, 2011

 

Bruce N. Warner, the Chief Financial Officer of Northern California Bancorp, Inc. certifies:

 

i.          that this annual  report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

ii.         that information contained in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations  of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
|   | /s/   Bruce N. Warner         |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | Bruce N. Warner               |
|   | Chief   Financial Officer and |
|   | Principal Accounting Officer  |

 

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Atrion Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated: May 9, 2011
/s/ Jeffery StricklandJeffery StricklandChief Financial Officer
 
 
 
 
 The foregoing certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and not for any other purpose.
§ 520.8 Effective dates. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) No new or initial rate, charge, or change in an existing rate, that results in an increased cost to a shipper may become effective earlier than thirty (30) calendar days after publication.
( 2 ) An amendment which deletes a specific commodity and applicable rate from a tariff, thereby resulting in a higher “cargo n.o.s.” or similar general cargo rate, is a rate increase requiring a 30-day notice period.
( 3 ) Rates for the transportation of cargo for the U.S. Department of Defense may be effective upon publication.
( 4 ) Changes in rates, charges, rules, regulations or other tariff provisions resulting in a decrease in cost to a shipper may become effective upon publication.
( b ) *Amendments.* The following amendments may take effect upon publication: ( 1 ) Those resulting in no change in cost to a shipper;
( 2 ) The canceling of a tariff due to cessation of all service by the carrier between the ports or points covered by the tariff;
( 3 ) The addition of a port or point to a previously existing origin or destination scope; or
( 4 ) Changes in charges which are not under the control of the common carrier or conference (including terminal services, canal tolls, additional charges, or other provisions) for which the carrier or conference merely acts as a collection agent for such charges and the agency making such changes does so without notifying the common carrier or conference. Ocean common carriers and NVOCCs must not mark up these charges above cost.
( c ) *Controlled carriers.* Published rates by or for controlled carriers are governed by the procedures set forth in part 565 of this chapter.
[64 FR 11225, Mar. 8, 1999, as amended at 89 FR 32, Jan. 2, 2024]
exv10w1



 






UCBH HOLDINGS, INC.

AND

UNTIED COMMERCIAL BANK




BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESOLUTION

FIXING DIRECTORS FEES FOR 2005




January 27, 2005


 




     RESOLVED, That each independent director be paid Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) as annual compensation for membership on the
Boards of Directors of UCBH Holdings, Inc. (“UCBH”) and United Commercial Bank (“UCB”) for the fiscal year ending on the 31st day of December 2005; and



     RESOLVED
FURTHER, That the Lead Director be paid Six Thousand Dollars ($6,000)
as annual compensation for serving as the Lead Director of the Boards of Directors of UCBH
and UCB for the fiscal year ending on the 31st day of December 2005;



     RESOLVED FURTHER, That the chairperson of the Audit Committee be paid Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) as annual compensation for serving as the chairperson
of the Audit Committee of the Boards of Directors of UCBH and UCB for the fiscal year ending on the 31st day of December 2005;



     RESOLVED
FURTHER, That the chairperson of the Credit Committee be paid Ten
Thousand Dollars ($10,000) as annual compensation for serving as the chairperson of the Credit
Committee of the Boards of Directors of UCBH and UCB for the fiscal year ending on the 31st day of December 2005;



     RESOLVED FURTHER, That chairperson of the Nominating Committee be paid Six Thousand Dollars ($6,000) as annual compensation for serving as the chairperson of the Nominating Committee of the
Boards of Directors of UCBH and UCB for the fiscal year ending on the 31st day of December 2005;



     RESOLVED FURTHER, That the chairperson of the Investment Committee be paid Six Thousand Dollars ($6,000) as annual compensation for serving as the chairperson of the Investment
Committee of the Boards of Directors of UCBH and UCB for the fiscal year ending on the 31st day of December 2004;



     RESOLVED FURTHER, That the chairperson of the Human Resources Committee be paid Six Thousand Dollars ($6,00) as annual compensation
for serving as the chairperson of the Human Resources Committee of the Boards of Directors of UCBH and UCB for the fiscal year ending on the 31st day of December 2005;



     RESOLVED FURTHER, That each independent director be paid Four Thousand Dollars ($4,000) as annual compensation for membership on and services to each committee of the Boards of Directors of UCBH and UCB to which he/she is appointed; and



     RESOLVED FURTHER, That the traveling and other expenses incurred by each independent director in attending any meeting of the board or of any board committee on which he/she is a member shall be reimbursed by UCBH and UCB.
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Jewett, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Jewett*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 44.]

(No. 98-1217

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided December 2, 1998.)

*Judith M. Stevenson,*Franklin County Public Defender, and *John W. Keeling,*Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 11

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(In thousands, except earnings per share data)




Basic and Diluted
Earnings per Share:

                         Three Months ended       Six Months ended
                             June 30,                  June 30,
                           1998     1997            1998      1997


Net Income (Loss)       $(92,746) $(68,351)        $37,674   $(185,608)

Basic Earnings per
Common Share               ($.01)    ($.01)           $.00       ($.01)

Diluted Earnings
per Common Share             N/A       N/A            $.00        N/A

Weighted average common
    shares outstanding     15,875    12,602         15,854       12,602

Weighted average common
     shares outstanding
     assuming dilution     15,875    12,602         16,902       12,602















Rev. 8/14/98
#### § 45.107 Strength of hull.

The general structural strength of the hull must be sufficient for the draught corresponding to the freeboard assigned and must be approved by the Commandant. Ships built and maintained in conformity with the requirements of a classification society may be recognized by the Commandant as possessing adequate strength.
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74 -73

 39

 40

 41

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

08/24

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 24 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
§ 50.05-5 Existing boilers, pressure vessels or piping systems. ( a ) Whenever doubt exists as to the safety of an existing boiler, pressure vessel, or piping system, the marine inspector may require that it be gaged or checked to determine the extent of deterioration, and if necessary for safety may require the recalculation and reduction of the maximum allowable working pressure.
( b ) For the purpose of recalculating the maximum allowable working pressure of boilers, pressure vessels, or piping which have deteriorated in service, the applicable design formulas in effect at the time it was contracted for or built must be used.
( c ) When existing vessels are reboilered, the mountings and attachments must be renewed in accordance with the regulations in this subchapter in effect at the time such reboilering work is contracted for. The existing steam piping must be examined. Those portions which are in good condition and comply with minimum thickness requirements in effect at the time such reboilering work is contracted for may be continued in service. The steam piping replaced must be in accordance with the regulations in this subchapter in effect for new construction.
( d ) For the purpose of this section, existing equipment includes only items which have previously met all Coast Guard requirements for installation aboard a vessel certificated by the Coast Guard, including requirements for design, fabrication, testing, and inspection at the time the equipment was new.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18808, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGD 81-79, 50 FR 9430, Mar. 8, 1985]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at December 31, 1997 and the Statement of Operations for
the Year Ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,347
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  170,510
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               173,857
<PP&E>                                       4,147,890
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,102,434
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,219,313
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              112
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,219,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,219,313
<SALES>                                        563,071
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               575,325
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               255,828
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                319,497
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            319,497
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   319,497
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    26.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    26.61
        

</TABLE>
#### § 174.200 Damaged stability in machinery spaces for all OSVs.

Each OSV must be shown by design calculations to comply, under each afloat condition of loading and operation, with § 174.207 of this subpart in case of damage between any two watertight bulkheads in each machinery space.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6322

DENNIS I. GREEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

J. R. JAMES,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.

(CA-99-570-3-HC-F)

Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 6, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis I. Green, Appellant Pro Se. Jerri Ulrica Dunston, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Dennis I. Green appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing some, but not all, claims from his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994)

petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. We dismiss

the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not

appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders, see 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and

collateral orders, see 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).

The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable

interlocutory or collateral order.

We deny Green’s motion for summary reversal and dismiss the

appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Pari-aguirre 1, 6) ' Cherry J.

irATI F-77-

Houk v. State, 103 Nev. 659, 664, 747 P.2d 1376, 1379 (1987), and we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

Hardesty

cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge Washoe County Alternate Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A < I 2 vj.:47.41 , 4251WWIRAMM".e.
# C_2013225EN.01004501.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/45

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 May 2013 — You Q BV v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Apple Corps Ltd

(Case C-294/12 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Community trade mark - Figurative mark containing the word element ‘BEATLE’ - Opposition by the proprietor of the Community and national word and figurative marks containing the word elements ‘BEATLES’ and ‘THE BEATLES’ - Refusal of registration by the Board of Appeal - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

2013/C 225/77

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: You Q BV (represented by: G.S.C.M. van Roeyen, advocaat)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis and I. Harrington, acting as Agents), Apple Corps Ltd (represented by A. Terry, Solicitor, and F. Clark, Barrister)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 March 2012 in Case T-369/10 You-Q v OHIM — Apple Corps (Beatle), by which that Court dismissed an action for annulment brought by the applicant for the figurative mark including the word element ‘BEATLE’ for goods in Class 12 against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 31 May 2010 in Case R 1276/2009-2, which annulled the Opposition Division’s decision rejecting the opposition brought by the proprietor of the Community and national word and figurative marks including the word elements ‘BEATLES’ and ‘THE BEATLES’ in respect of goods in Classes 6, 9, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 34 and 41

You-Q

OHIM — Apple Corps (Beatle)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | You-Q BV shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

You-Q BV shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 303, 6.10.2012.

1

---
#### Frederick Salow, *Respondent, v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, *Appellant.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### § 47.640 Form of certificate.

The form of the certificate is as specified in [§ 42.50-5(b) of this subchapter](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-42.50-5#p-42.50-5(b)) with the exception that the illustrated load line marks are as shown in Figure 1 below.

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC01FE91.017/EC01FE91.017_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC01FE91.017/EC01FE91.017_original_size.png)
§ 30.01-7 Ocean or unlimited coastwise vessels on inland and Great Lakes Routes—TB/OC. ( a ) Vessels inspected and certificated for ocean or unlimited coastwise routes shall be considered suitable for navigation insofar as the provisions of this subchapter are concerned on any inland route, including the Great Lakes.
EXHIBIT 99.1





i2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


LETTER TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


REGARDING CERTAIN REPRESENTATIONS RECEIVED FROM


ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP IN CONNECTION WITH THEIR AUDITS.





March 26, 2002





United States Securities and Exchange Commission


Division of Corporation Finance


450 Fifth Street, N.W.


Washington, D.C. 20549-0406





Ladies and Gentlemen:





i2
Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, has received a representation letter from Arthur Andersen LLP (Andersen), our independent public accountants, in connection with the issuance of their audit report included within this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. In their letter regarding the audits of our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2001, Andersen has represented to us the following:





| |  |  | their audits were subject to Andersens quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagements were
conducted in compliance with professional standards;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audits;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | there was appropriate availability of national office consultation; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------




| |  |  | there was appropriate availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen to conduct relevant portions of the audits.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Sincerely,





i2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.By:

/s/ WILLIAM M. BEECHERWilliam M. BeecherExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officeri2 Technologies, Inc.One i2 Place11701 Luna RoadDallas, Texas 75234




1
§ 309.203 Value at time of loss. The value of unused stores and supplies on board a vessel at the time of loss, and for which claims for loss will be paid equals: ( a ) The value of such stores and supplies on board at the completion of the previous voyage, plus
( b ) The value of stores and supplies purchased and placed on board the vessel before the commencement of the voyage during which the loss occurred, plus
( c ) The value of stores and supplies purchased and placed on board the vessel after the commencement of such voyage, less
( d ) That portion of the sum of paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section which was sold, transferred, used or consumed to, but not including, the date of the loss.
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**
**FAA -**  **2013 -**  **0480** Docket Number
**2012 -**  **SW -**  **090 -** **AD** Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket Eurocopter Al ert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. AS365 - 25.01.18, ASB No. EC155 - 25A114, ASB No. AS332 - 25.02.49, ASB No. EC225 - 25A110, all Revision 1 and all dated August 9, 2012.


### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.