alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
V

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1420

For the relief of Richard W. Schaffert.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 5, 1995

Mr. METCALF introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Richard W. Schaffert.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The limitations set forth in sec5 tions 6511 and 6514(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of

6 1986 (relating to period of limitation on filing claim and

7 on allowance of credits or refunds for tax overpayment)

8 shall not apply to a claim filed by Richard W. Schaffert

9 of Lincoln, Nebraska, for credit or refund of an overpay10 ment of the individual Federal income tax Richard W.

11 Schaffert paid for the taxable year 1983.
2

•HR 1420 IH

1 (b) DEADLINE.—Subsection (a) shall apply only if

2 Richard W. Schaffert submits a claim pursuant to such

3 subsection within the 1-year period beginning on the date

4 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 99.12****CONSENT OF EXPERT**     Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Cameco Corporation (the“Company”) to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.     I hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name under the heading “The NuclearBusiness — Reserves and Resources” in the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year endedDecember 31, 2007, dated March 28, 2008 (the “AIF”), under the heading “Qualified Persons” inManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation for the yearended December 31, 2007 (the “MD&A”) and in the 40-F, and to disclosure of a scientific andtechnical nature pursuant to which I have acted in a supervisory capacity under the heading “TheNuclear Business — Reserves and Resources” of the AIF and under the heading “Qualified Persons” inthe MD&A.Sincerely,     */s/         Doug Beattie*  Name:  Doug Beattie  Title:  Mine Manager, Rabbit Lake operations, Cameco Corporation  Date: March 31, 2008
Exhibit 23

                 Consent of Independent Public Accountants

      As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of our reports dated February 10, 2000 (except with respect to the
matter discussed in Note 12, as to which the date is March 3, 2000), included in
or incorporated by reference into Thermo Sentron Inc.'s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended January 1, 2000, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statement No. 333-66909 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No.
333-79621 on Form S-8.



                                                Arthur Andersen LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
March 9, 2000
Case 2:15-cv-12312-MOB-EAS ECF No. 55-15, PageID.1454 Filed 09/23/16 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:15-cv-12312-MOB-EAS ECF No. 55-15, PageID.1455 Filed 09/23/16 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:15-cv-12312-MOB-EAS ECF No. 55-15, PageID.1456 Filed 09/23/16 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:15-cv-12312-MOB-EAS ECF No. 55-15, PageID.1457 Filed 09/23/16 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:15-cv-12312-MOB-EAS ECF No. 55-15, PageID.1458 Filed 09/23/16 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:15-cv-12312-MOB-EAS ECF No. 55-15, PageID.1459 Filed 09/23/16 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:15-cv-12312-MOB-EAS ECF No. 55-15, PageID.1460 Filed 09/23/16 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:15-cv-12312-MOB-EAS ECF No. 55-15, PageID.1461 Filed 09/23/16 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:15-cv-12312-MOB-EAS ECF No. 55-15, PageID.1462 Filed 09/23/16 Page 9 of 9
EXHIBIT 21.1

i2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



| |  |                                              |  |               
| |  | -------------------------------------------- |  | --------------
| |  | i2 Technologies Pty Ltd                      |  | Australia     
| |  | i2 Technologies N.V.                         |  | Belgium       
| |  | i2 Technologies (Canada), Inc.               |  | Canada        
| |  | Beijing i2 Technologies Company Ltd.         |  | China         
| |  | i2 Technologies A/S                          |  | Denmark       
| |  | i2 Technologies Finland Oy Ltd.              |  | Finland       
| |  | i2 Technologies SARL                         |  | France        
| |  | Aspect Development Germany GmbH              |  | Germany       
| |  | i2 Technologies, GmbH                        |  | Germany       
| |  | i2 Technologies India Private Limited        |  | India         
| |  | i2 Technologies S.r.l.                       |  | Italy         
| |  | i2 Technologies Japan, Inc.                  |  | Japan         
| |  | i2 Technologies Korea, Ltd.                  |  | Korea         
| |  | i2 Technologies (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd           |  | Malaysia      
| |  | i2 de Mexico S. de R.L.C.V.                  |  | Mexico        
| |  | i2 Technologies (Netherlands) B.V.           |  | Netherlands   
| |  | FreightMatrix.com Europe B.V.                |  | Netherlands   
| |  | i2 Technologies PTE Ltd.                     |  | Singapore     
| |  | MStar SA (Pty) Ltd.                          |  | South Africa  
| |  | i2 Technologies SL                           |  | Spain         
| |  | i2 Technologies (Schweiz) GmbH               |  | Switzerland   
| |  | i2 Technologies Taiwan, Inc.                 |  | Taiwan        
| |  | i2 Technologies Limited                      |  | United Kingdom
| |  | ec-Content, Inc.                             |  | California    
| |  | RightWorks Corporation                       |  | California    
| |  | Aspect Development International, Inc.       |  | Delaware      
| |  | i2 Technologies International Services, Inc. |  | Delaware      
| |  | FreightMatrix.com, Inc.                      |  | Delaware      
| |  | i2 Federal, Inc.                             |  | Delaware      
| |  | i2 Technologies US, Inc.                     |  | Nevada
§ 31.40-40 Duration of Convention certificates—T/ALL. ( a ) The following certificates are valid for a period of not more than 60 months. ( 1 ) A Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate.
( 2 ) A Cargo Ship Safety Equipment Certificate.
( 3 ) A Safety Management Certificate.
( 4 ) A Cargo Ship Safety Radio Certificate.
( b ) An Exemption certificate must not be valid for longer than the period of the certificate to which it refers.
( c ) A Convention certificate may be withdrawn, revoked, or suspended at any time when it is determined that the vessel is no longer in compliance with applicable requirements. (See § 2.01-70 of this chapter for procedures governing appeals.)
[USCG-1999-4976, 65 FR 6500, Feb. 9, 2000]
Reducing Poverty Through Growth

Fact Sheet

June 13 2005 www.mcc.gov

Honduras and Millennium Challenge Corporation:

Building a Dynamic Partnership for

Poverty Reduction through Economic Growth

Millennium Challenge Corporation and the Government of Honduras have signed a five-year, $215 million 

Compact. 

Sixty-four percent of Hondurans live in poverty. The Millennium Challenge Compact with Honduras aims to 

reduce poverty and promote growth by increasing the productivity and business skills of farmers who operate 

small and medium-size farms and by reducing transportation costs between production centers and national, 

regional and global markets. To accomplish these two objectives, the $215 million Compact will invest in a Rural 

Development Project and a Transportation Project. The goal of the Compact is to increase Honduras’ annual 

income by an estimated $69 million by the end of the Compact. The Government of Honduras identified priorities for the Compact from their national Poverty Reduction Strategy and engaged a broad range of citizens in 

designing the program. 

The Rural Development Project

 Despite Honduras’ comparative advantage in horticultural products such as cucumbers, peppers, and tomatoes, 

Honduran farmers predominantly grow basic grains because horticultural crops require more sophisticated 

techniques and infrastructure for both their production and marketing. Additionally, lack of access to credit 

makes it more difficult for farmers to obtain the money required to produce these products and poor transportation infrastructure increases the costs of getting these products to market. The $72.2 million rural development 

project will improve the lives of the rural poor by providing Honduran farmers with the skills needed to grow 

and market horticultural crops. This will result in higher incomes for the farmers, their employees, and their 

communities. 

The Transportation Project

Hondurans identified high transportation costs as a significant impediment to economic growth, particularly 

for agriculture and light manufacturing. The $125.7 million transportation project is targeted at improving the 

CA-5 Norte Highway that links the Atlantic port of Puerto Cortes to Pacific ports and major production centers 

in Honduras, El Salvador and Nicaragua. Additionally, updating main highways, key secondary, and small rural 

roads will enable farmers and other businesses to get their products to market more efficiently, rural Hondurans 

to get to work and access social services, and children to get to school. 
Millennium Challenge Corporation

Fact Sheet: Honduras June 13, 2005 2

The Compact also includes $17 million for program management, oversight, monitoring and evaluation. 

###

Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), a United States government corporation designed to work with some of the 

poorest countries in the world, is based on the principle that aid is most effective when it reinforces good governance, 

economic freedom, and investments in people that promote economic growth and elimination of extreme poverty
Millennium Challenge Corporation

Fact Sheet: Honduras June 13, 2005 3
§ 25.45-1 Heating and lighting systems on vessels carrying passengers for hire. ( a ) No fuel may be used in any heating or lighting system on any vessel carrying passengers for hire without the approval of Commandant (CG-ENG), except— ( 1 ) Alcohol, solid,
( 2 ) Alcohol, liquid, combustible,
( 3 ) Fuel oil, No. 1, No. 2, or No. 3,
( 4 ) Kerosene,
( 5 ) Wood or,
( 6 ) Coal.
( b ) Heating and lighting systems using alcohol must meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) Containers of solidified alcohol must be properly secured to a fixed base.
( 2 ) Fluid alcohol burners, where wet priming is used, must have— ( i ) A catch pan of not less than 3 ⁄ 4” depth secured inside the frame of the stove; or
( ii ) The metal protection under the stove flanged up at least 3 ⁄ 4” to form a pan.
( c ) Heating and lighting systems using kerosene or fuel oil must meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) Where wet priming is used, each system must have— ( i ) A catch pan of not less than 3 ⁄ 4” depth secured inside the frame of the stove; or
( ii ) The metal protection under the stove flanged up at least 3 ⁄ 4” to form a pan.
( 2 ) Fuel tanks must be— ( i ) Separated from the stove that they serve;
( ii ) Mounted in a location open to the atmosphere or mounted inside a compartment that is vented to the atmosphere; and
( iii ) Fitted with an outside fill and vent.
( d ) Heating systems using wood or coal installed after August 9, 1989, shall be installed in accordance with the guidelines in chapter 6 of NFPA 302.
[CGD 83-013, 54 FR 6402, Feb. 10, 1989 and CGD 83-013, 55 FR 3959, Feb. 6, 1990; CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50461, Sept. 29, 1995; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50726, Sept. 27, 1996; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49225, Sept. 25, 2009]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending March 22, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending October 7, 2006

|Filer                         | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|ARVEST BANK                   | * Branch       | Arvest Bank, Fayetteville, Arkansas, to establish a branch facility to be located at 2600 Donaghey Avenue, Conway, Arkansas.                 | Newspaper:10/12/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                    | 10/12/2006    
|Federal Register:             | Not applicable
|BANK OF EVANSVILLE            | * Branch       | Bank of Evansville, Evansville, Indiana, to establish a branch facility to be located at 515 Dixie Lane, Evansville, Indiana.                | Newspaper:10/12/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                    | 10/12/2006    
|Federal Register:             | Not applicable
|FIRST BANK                    | * Branch       | First Bank, St. Louis, Missouri, to establish a branch facility to be located at 1788 Tribute Road, Suite 304, Sacramento, California.       | Newspaper:10/12/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                    | 10/12/2006    
|Federal Register:             | Not applicable
|FIRST SECURITY BANK OF CONWAY | * Branch       | First Security Bank of Conway, Conway, Arkansas, to establish a branch facility to be located at 624 Highway 365 South, Mayflower, Arkansas. | Newspaper:09/08/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                    | 09/08/2006    
|Federal Register:             | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

SUNDANCE, INC. et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 02-73543

DEMONTE FABRICATING, LTD. et al., HONORABLE AVERN COHN

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER

This is a patent case. Plaintiffs Sundance, Inc. and Merlot Tarpaulin and Sidekit

Manufacturing Company, Inc., holder of U.S. Patent No. 5,026,109 (the ‘109 patent)

covering a Segmented Cover System, is suing DeMonte Fabricating, Ltd. and Quick

Draw Tarpaulin Systems Inc. for infringement. Trial is scheduled to begin on Monday,

April 24, 2006.

On April 19, 2006, the Court held a hearing on the parties’ motions in limine and

other trial matters. This order memorializes the Court’s rulings.

1. Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine to Preclude Reference to Inequitable Conduct

Claims in the Presence of the Jury is GRANTED. There shall be no

reference to inequitable conduct or the use of pejoratives regarding

prosecution of the ‘109 patent in opening statements. After that,

defendant’s counsel must voir dire a witness outside the presence of the

jury if the witness is to be questioned on inequitable conduct. 

2. Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine Re Testimony at Trial by Humphrey Mosley is

DENIED.

2:02-cv-73543-AC Doc # 117 Filed 04/19/06 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1704
3. Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine for an Order to Preclude Testimony at Trial by

Dennis Pedder, PTO Examiner is GRANTED as to the jury phase of the

trial.

4. Plaintiff’s Moiton in Limine for an Order to Preclude Testimony at Trial by

Defendants’ Designated Expert Danile H. Bliss is DENIED.

5. Defendants’ Motion Regarding What Examples of Their Products the

Parties Can Bring to a View in this Matter is resolved as follows:

- Defendant can bring in exemplar products for the jury to view

- Plaintiff may not bring in exemplar products unless defendant 

challenges commercial success on the grounds that plaintiff’s sales

are for products not covered by the ‘109 patent.

6. Defendant’s Motion for a Ruling that Plaintiffs are Estopped from Arguing

that Conventional Segmented Cover Systems Known to be Used in

Diverse Applications are Non-Analogous Prior Art to the Invention of U.S.

Patent 5,026, 09 for Purposes of Determining Obviousness under 35

U.S.C. is DENIED.

7. Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment regarding laches is

DENIED as it relates to unenforceability and HELD IN ABEYANCE as it

relates to damages. 

8. Plaintiff’s unfair competition claim is BIFURCATED for separate trial.

SO ORDERED.

 s/Avern Cohn 

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: April 19, 2006

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, April 19, 2006, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 s/Julie Owens 

Case Manager

(313) 234-5160

2:02-cv-73543-AC Doc # 117 Filed 04/19/06 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1705
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 148 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 148

 To require random drug testing of Federal legislative branch officers 
                             and employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Solomon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require random drug testing of Federal legislative branch officers 
                             and employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Legislative Branch Drug Testing 
Act''.

SEC. 2. RANDOM DRUG TESTING IN LEGISLATIVE BRANCH.

    Each House of Congress, and each other entity within the 
legislative branch, shall require random drug testing of officers and 
employees within their respective bodies.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                         16,568
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  748,485
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,032)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               167,874
<PP&E>                                         47,790
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (19,987)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 66,356
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          166,772
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    16,322
<COMMON>                                       12
<OTHER-SE>                                     431
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   262,033
<SALES>                                        418,565
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               418,565
<CGS>                                          365,060
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  420,449
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               58,555
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             9512
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (14,562)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (14,424)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,884)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,067)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (18,060)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (3.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (3.10)



</TABLE>
#### § 35.01-10 Shipping papers—TB/ALL.

Each loaded tank vessel shall have on board a bill of lading, manifest, or shipping document giving the name of the consignee and the location of the delivery point, the kind, grades, and approximate quantity of each kind and grade of cargo, and for whose account the cargo is being handled. The tank vessel shall not be delayed in order to secure exact quantities of cargo. Such manifests or bills of lading may be made out by the master, master of the towing vessel, owner, or agent of the owner: *Provided, however,* That in the case of unmanned barges where shipping papers are not available, an entry in the logbook of the towing vessel giving the name of the shipper and location of shipping point, the name of the consignee and location of delivery point, the approximate kind, grade, and quantity of cargo in each barge of the tow, and for whose account the cargo is being handled, shall be considered as complying with the requirements of this section.