alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

RICHARD CROWELL, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BADAWI ABDELLATIF, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 15-10690 

SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

ARTHUR J. TARNOW

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

 / 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDING GRANTING 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO DISMISS [33]; GRANTING 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL [31]; DENIED AS MOOT 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [27]; DECLINING TO 

ADOPT AS MOOT REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDING DENYING 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO REVOKE PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS 

AND TO DISMISS [24]; DENIED AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO REVOKE 

PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS AND TO DISMISS [20] 

 

On February 23, 2015, Plaintiff, a Michigan Department of Corrections 

inmate, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pro se complaint. Currently before the Court is 

Plaintiff’s motion for voluntary dismissal [31]; Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary 

injunction [27]; Defendant’s motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status 

and to dismiss [20]; and Reports and Recommendations regarding Plaintiff’s 

2:15-cv-10690-AJT-RSW Doc # 34 Filed 10/27/15 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 425
2 

request to dismiss [33] and Defendant’s motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma 

pauperis status and to dismiss [24]. 

On August 20, 2015, Plaintiff filed a request for voluntary dismissal, 

modified to a motion on October 9, 2015, requesting the Court to dismiss without 

prejudice his instant civil complaint. [31]. Defendants filed a response on August 

27, 2015 stating that Defendant had no objection to the request for dismissal 

without prejudice. [32]. On October 6, 2015, the Magistrate recommended granting 

the dismissal without prejudice and gave a deadline of fourteen days from time of 

service to object to the R&R. [33]. Service was effectuated on October 6, 2015 and 

as of October 22, 2015 there has been no objections filed. Given that no objections 

have been filed, the Court ADOPTS the report and recommendation to grant 

without prejudice Plaintiff’s request to dismiss. [33]. 

IT IS ORDERED that the Court ADOPTS the Report and 

Recommendation granting without prejudice Plaintiff’s request to dismiss. [33]. 

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for voluntary dismissal [31] is GRANTED 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction [27] is 

DENIED AS MOOT; Defendant’s motion to revoke in forma pauperis status and 

to dismiss [20] is DENIED AS MOOT; and accordingly the Report and 

recommendation denying Defendant’s motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in forma 

2:15-cv-10690-AJT-RSW Doc # 34 Filed 10/27/15 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 426
3 

pauperis status and to dismiss [24] is not adopted by the Court given that the 

motion is moot. 

s/Arthur J. Tarnow 

 Arthur J. Tarnow 

Dated: October 27, 2015 Senior United States District Judge 

2:15-cv-10690-AJT-RSW Doc # 34 Filed 10/27/15 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 427
|   | 1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15                (d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the Company’s financial position and results of                operations. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |                                                                                                                                       |                                     |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                |                                                                                                                                       |
|                           |                                                                                                                                  |                                |
| Date:                  May 19, 2006 | By:                                                                                                                              | /s/ Jon                  Fullenkamp |
|                                | Jon                  Fullenkamp                                                                                                            |
|                                | Principal                        Executive OfficerPrincipal                        Financial and Accounting                        Officer |

----
§ 28.825 Excess fire detection and protection equipment. Instead of meeting the requirements of § 28.155, each vessel to which this subpart applies must meet the following requirements: ( a ) Installation of fire detection and protection equipment in excess of that required by the regulations in this subchapter is permitted provided that the excess equipment does not endanger the vessel or individuals on board in any way. The excess equipment must, at a minimum, be listed and labeled by an independent, nationally recognized testing laboratory and be in accordance with an appropriate industry standard for design, installation, testing, and maintenance.
( b ) An existing fixed gas fire extinguishing system that is in excess of the required fire protection equipment required by subparts A, B, and C of this part, may remain in place and continue in service as long as all parts of the system are maintained in good condition to the satisfaction of the Coast Guard Representative, and subject to the following: ( 1 ) A fixed fire extinguishing system capable of automatic discharge upon heat detection, may only be installed in a normally unoccupied space. For the purpose of this section, the machinery space aboard a fish tender operating in the Aleutian trade is considered occupied.
( 2 ) A fixed fire extinguishing system must: ( i ) Be capable of manual actuation from outside the space protected;
( ii ) Produce an audible alarm to indicate the discharge of the extinguishing agent for 20 seconds before the extinguishing agent is released into the space;
( iii ) The branch line valves of all fire extinguishing systems shall be plainly and permanently marked indicating the spaces serviced;
( iv ) The control cabinets or spaces containing valves or manifolds for the various fire extinguishing systems must be distinctly marked in conspicuous red letters at least 2 inches high: “[CARBON DIOXIDE/FOAM/CLEAN AGENT—as appropriate] FIRE SYSTEM.”
( v ) Instructions for the operation of the system must be located in a conspicuous place at or near all pull boxes, stop valve controls, and in the agent storage space;
( vi ) If the space or enclosure containing the supply or controls is to be locked, a key to the space or enclosure shall be in a break-glass-type box conspicuously located adjacent to the opening, and;
( vii ) Be equipped with a sign at the alarm stating: “WHEN ALARM SOUNDS—VACATE AT ONCE. CARBON DIOXIDE BEING RELEASED”, or list other fire extinguishing agent.
( 3 ) Any modification, alteration, or new installation of a fixed gas fire extinguishing system must meet the additional requirements of subpart D of this part.
[CGD 94-025, 60 FR 54444, Oct. 24, 1995, as amended by USCG-2004-18884, 69 FR 58344, Sept. 30, 2004; USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33872, June 7, 2012]
§ 310.51 Definitions. ( a ) *Academy* means the United States Merchant Marine Academy.
( b ) *Act* means the Maritime Education and Training Act of 1980, Pub. L. 96-453, 94 Stat. 1997, as subsequently amended, 46 App. U.S.C. 1295-1295g.
( c ) *Administration* means the Maritime Administration, Department of Transportation.
( d ) *Administrator* means the Administrator of the Maritime Administration.
( e ) *Citizen* means an individual who, by birth or naturalization, owes national allegiance to the United States, but the term excludes United States nationals.
( f ) *Cost of Education Provided* means the financial costs incurred by the Federal Government for providing training or financial assistance to students at the United States Merchant Marine Academy, including direct financial assistance, room, board, classroom academics, and other training activities.
( g ) *Foreign student* means an individual who owes national allegiance to a country or political entity other than the United States, and the term includes United States nationals.
( h ) *NOAA* means the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
( i ) *USNR* means the United States Naval Reserve.
[47 FR 21812, May 20, 1982, as amended at 69 FR 31902, June 8, 2004]
SCWC-12-0001040 

________________________________________________________________ 

Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-12-0001040 

03-FEB-2017 

02:17 PM 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII 

SCWC-12-0001040
 

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
 

SEMISI NELSON, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee, and
 

INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY,
 

Petitioner/Real Party in Interest/Appellant.
 

(CR NO. 05-1-2446)
 

AND
 

SCWC-12-0001041
 

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
 

KAREN TERUYA, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee, and
 

INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY,
 

Petitioner/Real Party in Interest/Appellant.
 

(CR NO. 02-1-1718)
 

AND

SCWC-12-0001042
 

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
 

CONRADO CABIGON, JR., Respondent/Defendant-Appellee, and
 

INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY,
 

Petitioner/Real Party in Interest/Appellant.
 

(CR NO. 08-1-1192)
 

AND
 

SCWC-12-0001043

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
 

STEVE D. FERRARIS, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee, and
 

INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY,
 

Petitioner/Real Party in Interest/Appellant.
 

(CR NO. 11-1-0306)
 
SCWC-12-0001045
 

________________________________________________________________ 

AND
 

SCWC-12-0001044
 

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
 

DAVID K. BERRY, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee, and
 

INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY,
 

Petitioner/Real Party in Interest/Appellant.
 

(CR NO. 10-1-1289)
 

AND
 

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
 

JUSTIN NAKAMURA, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee, and
 

INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY,
 

Petitioner/Real Party in Interest/Appellant.
 

(CR NO. 09-1-1364)
 

AND
 

SCWC-12-0001046
 

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
 

CEDRO MUNA, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee, and
 

INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY,
 

Petitioner/Real Party in Interest/Appellant.
 

(CR NO. 09-1-0616)
 

AND
 

SCWC-12-0001047
 

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
 

JOHN PAUL LUNA, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee, and
 

INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY,
 

Petitioner/Real Party in Interest/Appellant.
 

(CR NO. 10-1-0621)
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS 

(CAAP NOS. 12-0001040, -1041, -1042, -1043, 

-1044, -1045, -1046, and -1047) 

2
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., with 

Circuit Judge Nakasone in place of Wilson, J., recused) 

Petitioner/Real Party in Interest/Appellant International 

Fidelity Insurance Company’s application for writ of certiorari 

filed on December 23, 2016, is hereby accepted. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard 

in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to 

Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for 

retention of oral argument. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, February 3, 2017. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack 

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone 

3
#### § 45.13 Form of certificate.

The form of a load line certificate issued under this part is specified in appendix A to this part.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of i2 Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on date hereof (the Report), I, Mary K. Murray, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



|                                                                                   |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/S/    MARY K.
MURRAY                                                             
|Mary K. Murray Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer March 15, 2005



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 385.3 Purpose.

Sections 385.2 through 385.9 establish the MarAd assistance regulations which codify, implement, and publish uniform assistance policies and selected procedures applicable to MarAd and recipients of MarAd assistance awards. The MarAd assistance regulations do not, in and of themselves, provide authority for the use of assistance instruments nor the making of assistance awards where statutory authority has not been otherwise provided. Generic authority to award grants and cooperative agreements is provided in Pub. L. 95-224, the Federal Grant and Cooperative Agreement Act of 1977. The assistance regulations are distinct from the Federal and MarAd and Department of Transportation procurement regulations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               400
<OTHER-SE>                                           (400)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     3,485
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (3,485)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (3,485)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (3,485)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.001)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE YEAR ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                               145
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                         82
<ALLOWANCES>                          15
<INVENTORY>                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     214
<PP&E>                               105
<DEPRECIATION>                        34
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     3,440
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                410
<BONDS>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                         2,940
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       3,410
<SALES>                              116
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     116
<CGS>                                154
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        154
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   2,186
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        0
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (2,344)
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                       (2,344)
<EPS-BASIC>                       (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0



</TABLE>
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

UNILOC 2017 LLC,

Appellant

v.

HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC.,

Appellees

ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE 

FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER 

SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR 

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF 

THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK 

OFFICE,

Intervenor

______________________

2020-1547

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018-

01589.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

JAMES ETHERIDGE, Etheridge Law Group, Southlake, 

TX, for appellant. Also represented by BRIAN MATTHEW 

Case: 20-1547 Document: 63 Page: 1 Filed: 05/10/2021
KOIDE, RYAN S. LOVELESS, BRETT MANGRUM, JEFFREY A.

STEPHENS. 

 TODD ERIC LANDIS, Williams Simons & Landis PLLC, 

Dallas, TX, for appellees. Also represented by FRED 

WILLIAMS, Austin, TX; JOHN WITTENZELLNER, Philadelphia, PA. 

 PETER JOHN SAWERT, Office of the Solicitor, United 

States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for 

intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE,

WILLIAM LAMARCA, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.

 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (DYK, MAYER, and HUGHES, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

May 10, 2021 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 20-1547 Document: 63 Page: 2 Filed: 05/10/2021
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending November 10, 2007

|Filer                    | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------------ | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------
|CALDWELL HOLDING COMPANY | * 3A3          | Caldwell Holding Company, Columbia, Louisiana, to acquire 100 percent of Citizens Progressive Bank, Columbia, Louisiana. | Newspaper:12/03/2007Federal Register:11/26/2007    
|Newspaper:               | 12/03/2007    
|Federal Register:        | 11/26/2007    
|PLAINSCAPITAL BANK       | * Branch       | PlainsCapital Bank, Lubbock, Texas, to establish a branch to be located at 2900 Olive Street, Dallas, Texas 75215.       | Newspaper:11/20/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:               | 11/20/2007    
|Federal Register:        | Not applicable
|SOUTHWEST BANK           | * Branch       | Southwest Bank, Fort Worth, Texas, to establish a branch to be located at 2718 S. Hulen Street, Fort Worth, Texas 76109. | Newspaper:12/07/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:               | 12/07/2007    
|Federal Register:        | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us