alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Cite as 2022 Ark. 40



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

IN RE ARKANSAS BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS Opinion Delivered : February 17, 2022

PER CURIAM Blake Clardy of Springdale is appointed to the Arkansas Board of Law Examiners for

a six - year term concluding on February 1 7 , 202 8

. Mr. Clardy will be a representative of the
Third Congressional District and replaces Christopher May , whose term has expired

. The Court extends its sincere appreciation to Mr. Clardy for accepting appointment to this important b oard. The Court also expresses its gratitude to M r . May for his dedicated

service to the b oard

.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 85 / Thursday, May 3, 2007 / Presidential Documents 25183 

Proclamation 8137 of April 30, 2007 

Loyalty Day, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

America was founded by patriots who risked their lives to bring freedom 

to our Nation. Today, our citizens are grateful for our Founding Fathers 

and confident in the principles that lead us forward. On Loyalty Day, we 

celebrate the blessings of freedom and remember our responsibility to continue our legacy of liberty. 

Our Nation has never been united simply by blood, birth, or soil, but 

instead has always been united by the ideals that move us beyond our 

background and teach us what it means to be Americans. We believe deeply 

in freedom and self-government, values embodied in our cherished documents and defended by our troops over the course of generations. Our 

citizens hold the truths of our founding close to their hearts and demonstrate 

their loyalty in countless ways. We are inspired by the patriotic service 

of the men and women who wear our Nation’s uniform with honor and 

decency. The military spouses and families who stand by their loved ones 

represent the best of the American spirit, and we are profoundly grateful 

for their sacrifice. Our country is strengthened by the millions of volunteers 

who show deep compassion toward their neighbors in need. All citizens 

can express their loyalty to the United States by flying the flag, participating 

in our democracy, and learning more about our country’s grand story of 

courage and simple dream of dignity. 

The Congress, by Public Law 85–529, as amended, has designated May 

1 of each year as ‘‘Loyalty Day.’’ This Loyalty Day, and throughout the 

year, I ask all Americans to join me in reaffirming our allegiance to our 

Nation. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim May 1, 2007, as Loyalty Day. I call upon 

the people of the United States to participate in this national observance 

and to display the flag of the United States on Loyalty Day as a symbol 

of pride in our Nation. 

mmaher on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with $$_JOB

25184 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 85 / Thursday, May 3, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirtieth day 

of April, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 07–2218 

Filed 5–2–07; 8:54 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


mmaher on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with $$_JOBGWBOLD.EPS
EXHIBIT 99.19

CONSENT OF EXPERT

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the Form 40-F) of Cameco Corporation (the Corporation) to be
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

I hereby consent to reference to my name and my involvement in the preparation of, or supervision of the preparation of, scientific and
technical information in the following instances:



| | (a) | under the headings Operations and Projects  Uranium Operating Properties  McArthur River/Key Lake, Mineral Reserves and Resources and Governance  Interest of Experts
in the Corporations Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2014 dated March 6, 2015 for the McArthur River/Key Lake properties; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | under the headings Our Operations and Projects  Uranium Operating Properties  McArthur River/Key Lake and Mineral Reserves and Resources in Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operation for the year ended December 31, 2014 dated February 9, 2015 for the McArthur River/Key Lake properties,
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(collectively the Technical Information) in the Form 40-F, and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of information derived from the
Technical Information in the Form 40-F.

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such Technical Information in the
registration statements (Nos. 333-11736, 333-6180 and 333-139165) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Stock Option Plan, registration statement
(No. 333-196422) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Employee Share Ownership Plan and registration statements (Nos.333-181577 and 333-200678) on Form F-10.

Sincerely,



|                |  |                                                             
|--------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Baoyao Tang
|Name:           |  | Baoyao Tang, P. Eng.                                        
|Title:          |  | Technical Superintendent,
McArthur River, Cameco
Corporation

Date: March 6, 2015
(logo)LSI
                                                                 FINANCIAL GROUP



As of and for the year ended December 31, 1996, LSI Financial Group has complied
in all material respects with the minimum  servicing  standards set forth in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR
MORTGAGE  BANKERS.  As of and for this same  year,  LSI  Financial  Group had in
effect a  fidelity  bond and  errors  and  omissions  policy  in the  amount  of
$5,000,000,



/s/Bob Whisnant
Bob Whisnant, V.P, of Finance

8-1-97
Date



                                                            17500 Chenal Parkway
                                                                       Suite 200
                                               Little Rock, Arkansas 72211-9131
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending October 28, 2006

|Filer             | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                          
|----------------- | ----------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|HIGHER ONE, INC   | 4c8* 3A1    | Higher One, Inc., New Haven, Connecticut - to become a bank holding company pursuant to section 3(a)(1) of the BHC Act in connection with the formation of Higher One Bank, New Haven, Connecticut. | Newspaper:11/13/2006Federal Register:11/13/2006
|Newspaper:        | 11/13/2006 
|Federal Register: | 11/13/2006 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE LION
BREWERY, INC.'S BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,184
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,444
<ALLOWANCES>                                       186
<INVENTORY>                                      2,271
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,108
<PP&E>                                           6,833
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,352
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,685
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            39
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,335
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,467
<SALES>                                         26,869
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,869
<CGS>                                           20,099
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,099
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,680
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,214
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,382
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,832
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,832
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47
        

</TABLE>
§ 32.63-10 Rakes and coamings—B/ALL. ( a ) Each barge hull shall be constructed with a suitable blow form (length, shape, and height of headlog) to protect against diving at the maximum speed at which the barge is designed to be towed. In any integrated tow, only the lead barge need comply with this requirement. In any case, the operator of the towing vessel shall be guided by appropriate speed limitations.
( b ) All open hopper type barge hulls shall be provided with coamings around the hopper space and, additionally, a 36-inch minimum height plowshare breakwater on the forward rake. Coamings shall have a minimum height of 36 inches forward graduated to a minimum height of 24 inches at midlength and 18 inches thereafter.
---

Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of L.A.M. Pharmaceutical Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report), Joseph T. Slechta, the President, Chief Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                      
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                  
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects the financial condition and results of the
      Company.



|November 21, 2005 | /s/
      Joseph T. Slechta                                   
|----------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                  | Joseph T. Slechta, President, Chief Executive
      Officer,  
|                  | Principal Financial Officer and Chief
      Accounting Officer

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PAYLESS
SHOESOURCE, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS FOR THE 52 WEEKS
ENDED JANUARY 31, 1998, AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JANUARY
31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001008802
<NAME> PAYLESS SHOESOURCE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                         210,000<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F2>
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,900<F3>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F3>
<INVENTORY>                                    324,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               562,900
<PP&E>                                         850,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                 364,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,073,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          178,100
<BONDS>                                          6,500<F4>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           400
<OTHER-SE>                                     836,000<F5>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,073,000
<SALES>                                      2,566,900<F6>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,566,900
<CGS>                                        1,796,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,796,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (8,900)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                214,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                    85,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            128,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   128,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.35<F7>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.31<F7>
<FN>
<F1>Includes cash equivalent securities.
<F2>Any "securities" are shown under "Cash".
<F3>Receivables are net after deduction of allowances.
<F4>Consists of Capital Lease Obligations.
<F5>Reflects Retained Earnings and Additional Paid in Capital.
<F6>Reflects net sales.
<F7>Expressed in dollars.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 197.501 Applicability. ( a ) Except for vessels satisfying paragraph (b) of this section, this subpart applies to all Coast Guard inspected vessels, including tank ships and barges, that are carrying benzene or benzene containing liquids in bulk as cargo.
( b ) This subpart does not apply to vessels that are carrying only liquid cargoes containing less than 0.5% benzene by volume.
( c ) This subpart does not apply to vessels of foreign registry.
[CGD 88-040, 56 FR 52135, Oct. 17, 1991; 56 FR 65006, Dec. 13, 1991]
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49223, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60144, Sept. 30, 2013.

#### § 2.10-10 Waivers.

The Commandant (CG-DCO-83) will waive collection of vessel inspection fees in this subpart for a Federally-owned or operated vessel if the fee would be directly paid by an agency acting as the vessel owner using Federal appropriated funds. By October 1 of each year, Federal agencies shall provide Commandant (CG-DCO-83) with a list of the names and vessel identification numbers of vessels for which a fee waiver is requested.

[CGD 91-030, 60 FR 13563, Mar. 13, 1995, as amended by CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50459, Sept. 29, 1995; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50725, Sept. 27, 1996; USCG-2010-0759, 75 FR 60001, Sept. 29, 2010]
#### § 25.25-11 Condition.

The lifesaving equipment required by this subpart must be in serviceable condition.
# C_2013108EN.01001303.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/13

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 February 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Tivoli, Italy) — Elisabetta Gentile v Ufficio Finanziario della Direzione Ufficio Territoriale di Tivoli and Others

(Case C-499/12) (1)

1

(Request for a preliminary ruling - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Need for a link with European Union law - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

2013/C 108/27

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Tivoli

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Elisabetta Gentile

Applicant:

Defendants: Ufficio Finanziario della Direzione Ufficio Territoriale di Tivoli, Fabrizio Penna, Gianfranco Di Nicola

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale di Tivoli — Interpretation of Article 47 (3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, read in conjunction with Article 6 TEU and Article 52(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Legal aid — National legislation providing that lawyers’ fees are to be halved where the client is awarded legal aid

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to reply to the questions asked by the Tribunal di Tivoli (Italy).

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.

1

---
# C_2011269EN.01005201.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/52

---

Action brought on 5 July 2011 — Segovia Bonet v OHIM — IES (IES)

(Case T-355/11)

2011/C 269/115

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant(s): Jorge Segovia Bonet (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M.E. López Camba and J.L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyers)

Applicant(s):

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: IES Insurance Engineering Services Srl (Milan, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 March 2011 in case R 749/2010-2; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 March 2011 in case R 749/2010-2; and

| — | Order the defendant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘IES’, for services in classes 35, 36, 41, 42 and 45 — Community trade mark application No 6787345

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: UK trade mark registration No 2358802 of the figurative mark ‘IES’, for services in class 41

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld partially the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal and confirmed the decision of the Opposition Division

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal wrongly found that there was no likelihood of confusion between the earlier trademark and the contested community trade mark application as (i) the compared signs are confusingly similar, in particular from a phonetic point of view; and (ii) the services designated by the earlier registration are complementary to those designated by the contested Community trade mark application.

Pleas in law:

---
Exhibit 10.1


 


Contract
Amendment #1





 


This Amendment issued this 16th day of June, 2020, serves
as modification to the Agreement between HyperSolar, Inc (“Sponsor”) and The University of Iowa ("University")
dated 1st of June, 2019 for the project under the direction of Syed Mubeen.


 


The terms of the Agreement are hereby modified as follows:


 


		1.2	Add the following: The Contract Period is hereby extended through August 31, 2020.



 


 


All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force
and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, represented by officials
authorized to bind them, have caused this Amendment to be executed in duplicate as of the date(s) set forth below.


 


	SPONSOR	 	THE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Timothy Young______________	 	/s Wendy Beaver	 
	By: Name: Timothy Young, CEO	 	By: Wendy Beaver	 
	Title: 	 	Title: Executive Director	 
	 	 	 	 
	Date: 6-24-20_________________	 	Date:
    6-24-20__________________
#### § 30.10-43 Marine inspector or inspector—TB/ALL.

The terms *marine inspector* or *inspector* mean any person from the civilian or military branch of the Coast Guard assigned under the superintendence and direction of an Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, or any other person as may be designated for the performance of duties with respect to the enforcement and administration of Subtitle II, Title 46, U.S. Code, Title 46 and Title 33, U.S. Code, and regulations issued under these statutes.

[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16657, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGD 95-028, 62 FR 11597, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-1998-4442, 63 FR 52190, Sept. 30, 1998]