Order: 2012

- 2

- 13 Served: February 17, 2012



### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 17 th day of Febr uary, 2012

ORDER EXTENDING ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE CONTRACT S AND
REQUESTING PROPOSALS

Summary By this O rder, the Depa rtment is : (a) extending the contract of Hyannis Air Service, Inc. d/b/a Cape Air (Cape Air) to provide subsidized E ssential A ir S ervice (EAS) at Hagerstown, Maryland, and Lancaster, Pennsylvania, until further notice; 1 and (b) requesting proposals from carriers interes ted in providing EAS at Hagerstown and/or Lancaster, through September 30, 2015

, with or without subsidy. (See Appendix A for a service area map )

. Carriers should file their proposals no later than March 15

, 2012.

Background

B oth communities are within 70 driving miles of a large hub

-- Washington Dulles International for Hagerstown and Philadelphia International for Lancaster

-- and thus temporarily lost eligibility to receive EAS subsidy under P.L. 106

- 69 in 2000

. 2 However,

Section 409 of Vision 100 ( Public Law 108

- 176, Vision 100

-- Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act of 2003) allow ed these two communities to pet ition the Department

to review their mileage determination s . The law directed the Secretary of Transportation

to consult with the Govern ors of the States or the ir designees, and to consider their

certification s as to the “most commonly used route” between the communit ies and the

1 Such subsidy is calcul ated and distributed on a fiscal year basis, subject to the availability of appropriated

funds.

2 Congress first established these eligibility standards under P.L. 101

- 164 for fiscal year 1990, and reestablished them in fiscal years 1994

- 1999. Subsequentl y, the standards were made permanent by

P.L. 106

- 69, The Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Act of 2000. Essential Air Service at

HAGERS TOWN, MARYLAND LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA

Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq

. DOCKET DOT

- OST

- 2006

- 25228
DOCKET DOT

- OST

- 2002

- 11450- 2

-

nearest large or medium hub airport. Subsequently, the communities petitioned the Department to reconsider thei r mileage determination s

. The Department received

certifications from the Governors of each State that their communities were more than 70 miles from the nearest medium or large hub via the “most commonly used route.” By

Order s 2004

- 3

- 26 ( Lancaster ) and 2005

- 4

- 17 ( Hagerstow n )

, the Department affirmed the

States’ certifications and reinstated both communities ’ eligibility for EAS subsidy through September 30, 2007, the end of the then

- current Federal Aviation Administration

Reauthorization period

.

Since S eptember 30, 2007, s imilar extensions of the “most commonly used route” standard, as described above, have been signed into law extending eligibility for both

communities to receive subsidized EAS . The most recent extension was effective to

Febr uary 17

, 20 12

.

On February 14 , 201 2

, the President signed the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of

2012

, (P. L. 112

- 95 ) . T h is law, among other t hings, extend s both communities’ eligibility , under the “most commonly used route” standard, for subsidized EAS through

Se ptember 30, 2015

.

Decision Cape Air’s current contract expires on February 17 , 2012 . Therefore, the Department

must once again take action to ensure uninterrupted subsidized EAS at the two
communities. Similar to the determination s made in Order s 2011

- 9

- 20 and 2012

- 2

- 3 , the Department will extend the expiration date of Cape Air’s EAS cont ract for Hagerstown

and Lancaster at annual subsidy rates of $1,368,273 for Hagerstown and $1,647,112 for

Lancaster

, until further notice

. Cape Air inaugurated service at both communities in March 2009, so it will have been in place for approximately three years when its contract expires February 17, well

- beyond the typical two

- year contract

. 3

Request for Proposals

T he Department is requesting proposals from carriers in terested in providing service at Hagerstown and/or Lancaster, with or without subsidy, through September 3 0 , 2015

. Carriers should file their proposals no later than M arch 15

, 2012

. Staff will then docket proposals, thereby making them public, and shortl y afterwards will provide a summary of

3 By Order 2008

- 12

- 33, dated December 31, 2008, the Department selected Cape Air to provide four nonstop round trips per day at Hagersto wn at an annual subsidy rate of $1,203,167, and five nonstop round trips per day at Lancaster for an annual subsidy rate of $1,372,474, with all service being provided to

Baltimore

- Washington International Airport using 9

- seat Cessna 402 aircraft through S eptember 30, 2009.

Orders 2009

- 8

- 16, 2010

- 3

- 20, and 2010

- 10

- 1 extended Cape Air’s contract at the communities through September 30, 2011. To serve the public interest, and because as a practical matter there was not sufficient time to issue a request for proposals, process a carrier

- selection case, and have a new carrier in place prior

to October 1, 2011, the Department, by Orders 2011

- 9

- 20 and 2012

- 2

- 3, determined that it should continue to subsidize Cape Air to provide EAS at these two communities at th e revised annual rates detailed in the carrier’s August 24, 2011

, letter, subject to the communities ’ continued eligibility.- 3

-

the proposals to the communities and ask them for their final comments. We will give full consideration to all proposals that are timely filed. 4

Interested carriers should prepare their proposals with every expectat ion that their initial proposals will represent their final and only proposals. However, we retain the discretion to negotiate proposals with carriers when we deem it desirable. We also retain the discretion to reject outright all unreasonable or unreali stic proposals and re

- solicit a new round of proposals. However, negotiation and rejection are only occasional exceptions to

the rule.

We are here providing interested carriers with some basic information to serve as guidance when they prepare their prop osals, but we will not prescribe a precise format for their proposals. We expect proposals to adequately describe the service being proposed and the annual amount of subsidy being requested. The applicants can make their own judgments as to the level of detail they wish to present; however, they might want to include proposed schedules as well as supporting data for their subsidy requests, such as projected block hours, revenues and expenses. We strongly encourage clear, well

documented proposals that wi ll facilitate their evaluation by the affected communit ies and the Department. 5

Specifically, for service with 19

- seat or larger aircraft, we expect proposals for two round trips a day (12 a week) to Washington, Pittsburgh, New York, or any other large or medium hub airport offering numerous connections to the national air transportation system. If 8/9

- seat aircraft are proposed, we would expect four or five round trips a day (24 or 30 a week) to maintain the current level of service

. 6

The communities an d air carriers are encouraged to work together in advance of the due date for proposals to craft a service patter n that is desirable to the communities and meets the operational need of the airline interested in submitting a proposal. In addition,

carrier s should be very clear as to whether a specific community’s proposal is on a stand

alone basis, or whether it is part of a larger, inseparable package with other communities

.

4 Carriers should not expect the Department to accept late fillings. In cases where a carrier proposes to provide essential air se rvice without subsidy and we determine that service can be reliably provided without such compensation, we typically do not proceed with the carrier

- selection case. Instead, we simply rely on that carrier’s subsidy

- free service as proposed.

5 In selecting a carrier to provide subsidized essential air service, 49 U.S.C. 41733(c) (1) directs us to

consider four factors: (a) scheduled service reliability; (b) contractual and marketing arrangements with a larger carrier to ensure service beyond the hub; (c) i nterline arrangements that the applicant has made with a larger carrier at the hub; and (d) community views, giving substantial weight to the views of the elected officials representing the users. In addition, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008, Pu blic Law 110

- 161, provides that when selecting a carrier to provide EAS, the Department may consider the relative subsidy requirements

. Interested carriers should also be aware that our general provisions governing EAS

will be included in the selection or der as part of our authorization of subsidy for the selected service. Appendix C of this order contains those general provisions.

6 Previously, most EAS communities were entitled to service with 15

- sea t or larger aircraft. However, for

FY 2012, Congress revoked the minimum req uirement that basic EAS include service with at least 15

- seat

or larger aircraft. See Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, P.L. 112

- 55,

November 18, 2011. C ommunities are still entitled to service with twin

- engin e aircraft.- 4

-

Service and Traffic History In order to assist carriers in developing traffic and revenue projections for their proposals, we have summarized historical passenger traffic in Appendix B. For the year ended Septe mber 30, 20 11 , Hagerstown averaged 11 enplanements a day

, and Lancaster, 20

.

New Filing Procedures Carrier proposals should b e submitted to the Department with all materials compiled into a single document. In addition, because the document will be published on http://www.regulations.gov/ , each page should be formatted to be viewed onli ne and for easy printing.

Other Carrier Requirements The Department is responsible for implementing various Federal statutes governing lobbying activities, drug

- free workplaces, and nondiscrimination. 7 Consequently, all

carriers receiving Federal subsidy for Essential Air S ervice must certify that they are in compliance with Department regulations regarding drug

- free workplaces and nondiscrimination, and those carriers whose subsidies exceed $100,000 over the life of

the rate

- term must also certify that t hey are in compliance with the regulations governing lobbying activities. Because the Department is prohibited from paying subsidy to carriers that do not submit these documents, all carriers that plan to submit proposals involving subsidy should be aware that the selected carrier will be required to complete the required certifications. Interested carriers requiring more detailed information regarding these requirements should contact the Office of Aviation Analysis at (202) 366

- 5903. 8

Community and Sta te Comments The communities and States are welcome to submit comments at any time. We encourage prospective applicants to contact the communities before they submit their proposals so that they can tailor them to the communities’ needs, as they will not b e able to amend them after the due date. As noted earlier, we will provide a summary of the proposals to the civic parties and ask them to submit their final comments shortly after

March 15 , the deadline for carrier proposals.

This O rder is issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.56a(f).

ACCORDINGLY,

1. The Department extends the expiration date of the EAS contract of Hyannis Air Service, Inc. d/b/a Cape Air , for the provision of EAS at Hagerstown, Maryland, and Lancaster, Pennsylvania, as set for th in Appendix E

, until further notice ;

7 The regulations applicable to these areas are: (1) 49 CFR Part 20

-- New restrictions on lobbying; (2) 49 CFR Part 21

-- Nondiscrimination in federally

- assisted programs of the Department of Transportation

-- Effectuation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; 49 CFR Part 27

-- Nondiscrimination on the basis of disability in programs and activities receiving or benefiting from Federal financial assistance; and 14 CFR Part 382

-- Nondiscrimination on the basis of disability in air travel ; and (3) 49 CFR Part 29

-- Government

- wide debarment and suspension (non

- procurement) and government

wide requirements for drug

- free workplace (grants).

8 The certifications are also available on the web at http://ostpxweb.dot.gov/aviation/index.html.- 5

-

2 . We request that ca rriers interested in providing Essential Air S ervice at Hagerstown, Maryland

, and/or Lancaster, Pennsylvania , submit their proposals, with or without subsidy requests, no later than March 15

, 20 12. The proposals should be e

- mailed to: EAS@dot.gov with the title “Proposal to Provide Essential Air Service at Hagerstown, Maryland

, and/or Lancaster, Pennsylvania ” with the docket number corresponding to the

communit i es as s hown on the first page of this O rder; 9

3 . The Department directs Hyannis Air Service, Inc. d/b/a Cape Air to retain all books, records, and other source and summary documentation to support claims for payment, and to preserve and maintain such doc umentation in a manner that readily permits its audit and examination by representatives of the Department. Such documentation shall be retained for seven years from the service date of this Order or until the Department indicates that the records may be destroyed, whichever comes first. Copies of flight logs for aircraft sold or disposed of must be retained. The carrier may forfeit its compensation for any claim that is not supported under the terms of this order;

4 . Dockets DOT

- OST

- 2006

- 25228 and 200 2

- 11450 will remain open until further order of the Department; and

5

. We will serve copies of this O rder on the communities and the parties listed in Appendix F

.

By:

SUSAN L. KURLAND Assistant Secretary for Aviation

and International Affairs

(SEAL )

An electronic version of this document is available online at www.regulations.gov

9 Q uestions regarding filings in response to this order may be directed to Brian Swanson at (202) 366

- 5392

or brian.swanson@dot.gov

.

### Ap pendix A

AREA MAP

### Appendix B

Notes : 1. Source: US DOT Bureau of Transportation Stat istics, Form T

- 100

2. Origin

- destination passengers divided by two.

3. Average annual enplanements divided by 313 effective annual service days.

4. No data reported for October, November, and December.

5. Hiatus in EAS

– October 2007 through March 2009. Allegiant Air commenced service between Hagerstown and Orlando on November 14, 2008. Year Ended Origin &

Destination Passengers Annual

Enplanements 2 Average Enplanements Per Service Day

31-Dec-05 3 9,852 4,926 15.7

31-Dec-06 3 11,711 5,856 18.7

31-Dec-07 4 5,413

- -
31-Dec-08 5

- - -
31-Dec-09 5 4,871 2,436

-
31-Dec-10 3 6,283 3,142 10.0

30-Sept-11 3 6,744 3,372 10.8

Year Ended Origin &

Destination Passengers Annual

Enplanements 2 Average Enplanements Per
Service Day 3

31-Dec-05 3 11,717 5,859 18.7

31-Dec-06 3 13,353 6,677 21.3

31-Dec-07 4 8,820

- -
31-Dec-08 5

- - -
31-Dec-09 5 7,162 3,581

-
31-Dec-10 3 11,210 5,605 17.9

30-Sept-11 3 12,633 6,317 20.2 Historical Enplanements 1
Lancaster, Pennsylvania Historical Enplanements 1

Hagerstown, Maryland

### Appendix C

Example of General Terms and Conditions for Essential Air Service

The carrier understands that it may forfeit its compensation for any flights that it does not operate

in conformanc e with the terms and stipulations of the rate order, including the service plans outlined in the order and any other significant elements of the required service, without prior approval. The carrier understands that an aircraft take

- off and landing at its scheduled destination constitutes a completed flight; absent an explanation supporting subsidy eligibility for a flight that has not been completed, such as certain weather cancellations, only completed flights are considered eligible for subsidy. In add ition, if the carrier does not schedule or operate its flights in full conformance with the order for a significant period, it may jeopardize its entire subsidy claim for the period in question. If the carrier contemplates any such changes beyond the scop e of the order during the applicable period of these rates, it must first notify the Office of Aviation Analysis in writing and receive written approval from the Department to be ensured of full compensation. Should circumstances warrant, the Department m ay locate and select a replacement carrier to provide service on these routes. The carrier must complete all flights that can be safely operated; flights that overfly points for lack of traffic will not be compensated. In determining whether subsidy paym ent for a deviating flight should be adjusted or disallowed, the Department will consider the extent to which the goals of the program are met and the extent of access to the national air transportation system provided to the community.

If the Department unilaterally, either partially or completely, terminates or reduces payments for service or changes service requirements at a specific location provided for under this order, then, at the end of the period for which the Department does make payments in the stipulated amounts or at the stipulated service levels, the carrier may cease to provide service to that specific location without regard to any requirement for notice of such cessation. Those adjustments in the levels of subsidy and/or service that are mutually agreed to in writing by the Department and carrier do not constitute a total or partial reduction or cessation of payment.

Subsidy contracts are subject to, and incorporate by reference, relevant statutes and Department regulations, as they may b e amended from time to time. However, any such statutes, regulations, or amendments thereto shall not operate to controvert the foregoing paragraph.

Funds are not currently available for performance under this solicitation beyond [DATE] . The Department’ s obligation for perform ance under this solicitation beyond [DATE] is contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds from which payment for services can be made. No legal liability on the part of the Department for any payment may arise for perfor mance under this order beyond [DATE] , until funds are made available to the Department for performance. If funds are not made available for performance beyond [DATE] , the carrier will receive notice in writing by the Department.

All claims for payment mu st be submitted within 60 days of the last day of se rvice provided

under this order.

### Appendix D

HYANNIS AIR SERVICE, INC. d/b/a CAPE AIR
ANNUAL COMPENSATION REQUIREMENT FOR ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE AT HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND

, AND LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA

### Appendix E Page 1 of 3

HYANNIS AIR SERVICE, INC. d/b/a CAPE AIR
ANNUAL COMPENSATION REQUIREMENT FOR ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE AT HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND

Effective period: Beginning February 18 , 2012 , until further notice

Service: 28 nonstop round trips per week to Baltimore

- Washington International Airport

Intermediate stops and upline service: No upline service is permitted without prior Department approval.

Aircraft type: Cessna 402 (9 seats)

Timing of flights: Flights must be well

- timed and well

- spaced in order to ensure full compensation.

Annual compensation: $1, 368

, 273

Subsidy Rate Per Arrival/Departure: $ 484 1

Weekly Compensation Ceiling: 2 $ 27,104 3

___________________________ 1 Annual compensation of $1, 368,279 divided by 2,825 annual arrivals and departures, assuming a 97% completion factor. (56 flights per week x 52 weeks x 97% completion = 2,825)

2 This rate assumes an annual completion factor of 97 percent. A compensation ceiling is to be applied per calendar week such tha t service above that ceiling in one week cannot make up for service shortfalls

in another week.

3 Subsidy rate per arrival/departure of $4 84 multiplied by 56 eligible arrivals and departures.

### Appendix E Page 2 of 3

HYANNIS AIR SERVICE, INC. d/b/a CAPE AIR
ANNUAL COMPENSATIO N REQUIREMENT FOR ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE AT LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA

Effective period: Beginning February 18, 2012, until further notice

Service: 35 nonstop round trips per week to Baltimore

- Washington International Airport

Intermediate stops and upli ne service: No upline service is permitted without prior Department approval.

Aircraft type: Cessna 402 (9 seats)

Timing of flights: Flights must be well

- timed and well

- spaced in order to ensure full compensation.

Annual compensation: $1, 647

, 112

Su bsidy Rate Per Arrival/Departure: $ 466 1

Weekly Compensation Ceiling: 2 $ 32,620 3

___________________________ 1 Annual compensation of $1, 647,112 divided by 3,531 annual arrivals and departures, assuming a 97% completion factor. (70 flig hts per week x 52 weeks x 97% completion = 3,531)

2 This rate assumes an annual completion factor of 97 percent. A compensation ceiling is to be applied per calendar week such that service above that ceiling in one week cannot make up for service shortfa lls

in another week.

3 Subsidy rate per arrival/departure of $ 466 multiplied by 70 eligible arrivals and departures.

### Appendix E Page 3 of 3

NOTE:

The carrier understands that it may forfeit its compensation for any flights that it does not operate

in conformance with the te rms and stipulations of the rate order, including the service plans outlined in the order and any other significant elements of the required service, without prior approval. The carrier understands that an aircraft take

- off and landing at its scheduled

de stination constitutes a completed flight; absent an explanation supporting subsidy eligibility for a flight that has not been completed, such as certain weather cancellations, only completed flights are considered eligible for subsidy. In addition, if the carrier does not schedule or operate its flights in full conformance with the order for a significant period, it may jeopardize its entire subsidy claim for the period in question. If the carrier contemplates any such changes beyond the scope of the orde r during the applicable period of these rates, it must first notify the Office of Aviation Analysis in writing and receive written approval from the Department to be ensured of full compensation. Should circumstances warrant, the Department may locate and select a replacement carrier to provide service on these routes. The carrier must complete all flights that can be safely operated; flights that overfly points for lack of traffic will not be compensated. In determining whether subsidy payment for a dev iating flight should be adjusted or disallowed, the Department will consider the extent to which the goals of the program are met and the extent of access to the national air transportation system provided to the community.

If the Department unilaterally, either partially or complete ly , terminates or reduces payments for service or changes service requirements at a specific location provided for under this order, then, at the end of the period for which the Department does make payments in the stipulated a mounts or at the stipulated service levels, the carrier may cease to provide service to that specific location without regard to any requirement for notice of such cessation. Those adjustments in the levels of subsidy and/or service that are mutually agre ed to in writing by the Department and carrier do not constitute a total or partial reduction or cessation of payment.

Subsidy contracts are subject to, and incorporate by reference, relevant statutes and Department regulations, as they may be amended fro m time to time. However, any such statutes, regulations, or amendments thereto shall not operate to controvert the foregoing paragraph.

Funds are not currently available for performance under this order beyond September 30 , 201 2

. The Department’s obliga tion for performance unde r this order beyond September 30, 201 2 , is subject to the availability of appropriated funds from which payment for services can be made. No legal liability on the part of the Government for any payment may arise for performance

u nder this order beyond September 30, 201 2 , until funds are made available to the Department for performance. If funds are not made available for performance beyond September 30, 201 2

, the Department will provide notice in writing to the carrier.

All clai ms for payment must be submitted within 60 days of the last day of se rvice provided

under this order.

### Appendix F

SERVICE LIST

Air Choice One Airlines, Shane Storz Delta Air Lines, Stephen A. Hedden Pacific Aviation Group, Craig Garrick

Air Greco/Wings Air Dorado Jets Pacific Aviation Group, Ron Rye

Air Sunshine, Inc. Dorado Jets, Mark McKenna Pacific Wings, Frank Ford

Air Sunshine, Mirmohammad Adili Era Aviation, Lori Goodman Pacific Wings, Greg Kahlstorf

Air West, Inc., John Raatz Executive Airlines, Kate Sole d Penn Air, Danny Seybert

Air Wisconsin, Annette Daly ExpressJet, Jon Lindlief Penn Air, Scott Bloomquist

Air Wisconsin, Jim Rankin ExpressJet, Roger Weston Pinnacle Airlines, Jennifer Gammill

Airline Associates, Bill Mishk Frontier Airlines, Daniel Shu rz Pinnacle Airlines, Megan Rosia

Alaska Airlines, Jeff Cole Frontier Flying, Bob Hajducovich Pinnacle Airlines, Phil Reed

Alaska Airlines, Sandy Sinick Frontline Aviation Planemasters, Inc., John Kessler

American Airlines, Carl Nelson Gem Air, Dan Schr oeder Planemasters, Inc., Paul Berliner

American Eagle, Gary Foss Gem Air, JoAnn Wolters Planemasters, Inc., Todd DeSimone

American Eagle, Robert Emrich Great Lakes Airlines, Chuck Howell RAA, Faye Balck

American Eagle, Patrick Swift Great Lakes Airline s, Doug Voss Raytheon, Mike Schiedt

Aviation Express, Brad Shriner Homeland Security, Bill Ragan Rectrix, Aviation, Scott LaForge
Aviation Technologies/Charter Air Transport, Jim Gallagher Homeland Security, David Bernier Saab Group, Polly Prelinger

Be midji Aviation, Arlen Rinkenberger Horizon Air, Jennifer Thompson Scenic, Mary Schneider

Bemidji Aviation, Cori Rude Horizon Air, Mike McQeen Scenic, Mitzi Daines

Cape Air, Andrew Bonney Horizon Air, Jeff Cole Seaborne Airlines, Shawn Lewis

Cape Air, Da n Wolf ICEPR, Luis Irizarry SeaP ort Airlines

, EAS Mailbox

Cape Air, J. Flaherty Intrepid Internatl Air, Rick Eyk SeaPort Airlines. Rob McKinney

Capital Aviation, Mike Colgan Island Air Charters, Linda House Shuttle America, Jerry Balsano

Chautauqua, Jos h Pascoe Jet Air, Daniel Wolford Silver Airways, Darrell Richardson

Classic Aviation, Tony Henderson Kenmore Air, Tim Brooks Silver Airways, Mickey Bowman

Colgan Air, Kevin Scott McCall Aviation, Dan Scott SkyWest, Brad Rawson

Colgan Air, Mike Colgan Mc Call Aviation, Michelle SkyWest, Eric Christensen

CommutAir, Andy Price Mesaba, John Spanjers SkyWest, Michael Thompson

CommutAir, Joel Raymond Mesaba, Max Shemesh Sovereign Air, Bob Karns

Consultant, Jeff Hartz Michigan DOT, Matt Brinker Tailwind Inter national, Michele

Wilkinson
Consultant, Mike Mooney Midstar Airlines, Jeffrey Fonner Tatonduk, Robert Everts

Consultant, Robert Silverberg Republic Air Line , Greg Aretakis Tatonduk, Robert Ragar

Consultant, Ron McNeil MN Aviation, Jose Maldonado Tradewi nd, Eric Zipkin

Continental, Bruce Keiner Multi Aero, Darnea Transport Azumah, Joel Anabilah

Azumah

Continental, Dan Weiss Multi Aero, Shane Storz Trans States, Fred Oxley

Continental, Lorry Halloway Northern Air Cargo, David Karp Trans States, Gerry Wi gmore
Delta Air Lines Anthony Canitano Northern Air Cargo, Eric Van Andel Trans States, Warren Crotty

Delta Air Lines, Dan Shuman NYDC, Henok Araya United, Alicia Gabriel

Delta Air Lines, Dana Debel OST, Brian Swanson United, James Starnes

Delta Air L ines, Jeff Davidman OST, Brooke Chapman US Airways, Benjamin Slocum

Delta Air Lines, Jeff Morgan OST, Dennis DeVany US Airways, Howard Kass

Delta Air Lines, Joe Esposito OST, Kevin Adams US Airways, Jason Reisinger

Delta Air Lines, Kristal Murphy OST, K evin Schlemmer Warbelows Air Ventures, Art

Warbelow
Delta Air Lines, Sally Veith OST, Michael Martin HGR, Phil Ridenour

Delta Air Lines, Sascha Vanderbellen OST, Scott Faulk HGR, Greg Larson

LNS, David Eberly LNS, Kim Huber