alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            1336
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4648
<ALLOWANCES>                                       305
<INVENTORY>                                         22
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6172
<PP&E>                                             776
<DEPRECIATION>                                     393
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   10924
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3574
<BONDS>                                            917
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                        6428
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     10924
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 22650
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    17241
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  6585
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 256
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1432)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       364
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1796)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1796)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.36)
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of James H. Kennedy, an Attorney and Counselor of the Supreme Court.

Ordered, that the said James H. *403Kennedy be and he hereby is removed from the office of attorney and counselor of the Supreme Court.
#### § 30.10-29 Gas free—TB/ALL.

The term *gas free* means free from dangerous concentrations of flammable or toxic gases.
#### § 30.30-7 Availability of materials.

Evaluation materials submitted in accordance with this subpart will be available for inspection and copying at Coast Guard Headquarters. Contact Commandant (CG-CVC), Attn: Office of Commercial Vessel Compliance, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7501, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7501; telephone 202-372-1251.

[USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60146, Sept. 30, 2013]
**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/              Richard Rallo       |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   | Richard              Rallo           |
|   | Chief              Financial Officer |

**A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been      provided to American Medical Alert Corp. and will be retained by American      Medical Alert Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission      or      its staff upon request.**
#### MARY KRATKY, PROSECUTOR, v. BOARD OF PHARMACY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.

Submitted May 18, 1929

Decided November 7, 1929.

*971Before Justices Thekchaed, Lloyd and Case.

Eor the prosecutor, *Lum, Tamblyn & Colyer (William F. Gorman,*of counsel).

Eor the defendant, *William A. Stevens,*attorney-general, and *Grover G. Richman.*

Pee Curiam.

The prosecutor of this writ was convicted of violation of section 2 of the Pharmacy act *(Comp. Slat., p.*3944), in that she retailed and dispensed drugs and medicines, *i. e.,*“camphorated oil” and “essence of peppermint,” not being then and there a registered pharmacist or a registered assistant.

The first point is that the judge admitted illegal evidence of contents of the bottles purchased from the prosecutor. We think not. The witness “examined it” and says in effect that he could and did determine its contents.

The second point is that a nonsuit should have been granted. We think not. The charge and proof was of a violation of section 2, and a reading of section 6 shows that it does not relieve defendant of the offense.

The third point is that the act is unconstitutional in that section 9 thereof provides that the act shall not apply to sale of “simple non-poisonous domestic remedies by retail dealers in rural districts.”

There seems to be no basis in fact for this objection in the present case.

The trial judge found as a fact that Little Eerry, where the sales were made, was not a rural district. There was no evidence to show that the articles sold were “simple nonpoisonous domestic remedies.” On the contrary the evidence was that they were medicines. It therefore seems that under the proofs sales of the articles in question should be treated as sales prohibited by section 2 of the act without regard to the provisions of section 9 which, if invalid, would not render the act invalid *in toto.*

The judgment will be affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10K AT JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      40,764,246
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,400,953
<ALLOWANCES>                                   793,900
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            50,602,649
<PP&E>                                      38,634,359
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,215,239
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             218,316,724
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,899,580
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,042
<OTHER-SE>                                 191,949,755
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               218,316,373
<SALES>                                     55,354,030
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            55,354,030
<CGS>                                       51,656,016
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            37,576,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,546)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (33,875,840)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (33,875,840)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           (10,407,954)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (44,283,794)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.14)


</TABLE>
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1494

To amend the National Security Act of 1947 to establish the positions

of Director, Deputy Director, and Senior Directors of the National Security Council and to require that their appointments be subject to confirmation by the Senate, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 7, 1995

Mr. DIAZ-BALART (for himself, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN,

and Mr. FUNDERBURK) introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on National Security and in addition to the Committees

on International Relations, and Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend the National Security Act of 1947 to establish

the positions of Director, Deputy Director, and Senior

Directors of the National Security Council and to require

that their appointments be subject to confirmation by

the Senate, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1494 IH

1 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF POSITIONS OF DIRECTOR,

2 DEPUTY DIRECTOR, AND SENIOR DIRECTORS

3 OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 101 of

5 the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 402) is

6 amended to read as follows:

7 ‘‘(c)(1) The Council shall have a director and a dep8 uty director, both of whom shall be appointed by the Presi9 dent, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

10 ‘‘(2) The Council may have such additional senior di11 rectors as the President determines necessary. Such senior

12 directors shall be appointed by the President, by and with

13 the consent of the Senate.

14 ‘‘(3) The director may appoint and fix the compensa15 tion of such additional personnel as may be necessary to

16 perform such duties as may be prescribed by the Council

17 in connection with the performance of its functions.

18 ‘‘(4) The director, deputy director, senior directors,

19 and such additional personnel shall be appointed subject

20 to the provisions of title 5, United States Code, governing

21 appointments in the competitive service, and shall be paid

22 in accordance with the provisions of chapter 51 and sub23 chapters III and VIII of chapter 53 of that title relating

24 to classification and General Schedule and Senior Execu25 tive Service pay rates.’’.
3

•HR 1494 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

2 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment

3 of this Act and shall apply with respect to any individual

4 serving on such date in one of the following positions: the

5 Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs,

6 the Deputy Assistant to the President for National Secu7 rity Affairs, and any Special Assistant to the President

8 and Senior Director of the National Security Council.

Æ
#### § 502.91 Order to show cause.

The Commission may institute a proceeding by order to show cause. The order will be served upon all persons named therein, will include the information specified in § 502.221, will require the person named therein to answer, and may require such person to appear at a specified time and place and present evidence upon the matters specified. [Rule 91.]

[81 FR 93836, Dec. 22, 2016]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6664

JEFFREY S. ADKINS, Petitioner - Appellant, versusATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; EDWARD W. MURRAY, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-93-215-R) Submitted: August 10, 2001 Decided: September 5, 2001 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey S. Adkins, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Quentin Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jeffrey S. Adkins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant permission to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Adkins v. Attorney Gen. , No. CA-93-215-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 5, 2001).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2434 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2434

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the deduction for 
                qualified tuition and related expenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2009

  Ms. Kosmas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the deduction for 
                qualified tuition and related expenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``College Tuition Tax Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION FOR QUALIFIED TUITION AND RELATED 
              EXPENSES.

    Subsection (e) of section 222 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by striking ``December 31, 2009'' and inserting ``December 
31, 2010''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 31.10-24 Integral fuel oil tank examinations—T/ALL. ( a ) Each fuel oil tank with at least one side integral to the vessel's hull and located within the hull (*integral fuel oil tank*) is subject to inspection as provided in this section. The owner or operator of the vessel shall have the tanks cleaned out and gas freed as necessary to permit internal examination of the tank or tanks designated by the marine inspector. The owner or operator shall arrange for an examination of the fuel tanks of each vessel during an internal structural examination at intervals not to exceed five years.
( b ) Integral non-double-bottom fuel oil tanks need not be cleaned out and internally examined if the marine inspector is able to determine by external examination that the general condition of the tanks is satisfactory.
( c ) Double-bottom fuel oil tanks on vessels less than 10 years of age need not be cleaned out and internally examined if the marine inspector is able to determine by external examination that the general condition of the tanks is satisfactory.
( d ) All double-bottom fuel oil tanks on vessels 10 years of age or older but less than 15 years of age need not be cleaned out and internally examined if the marine inspector is able to determine by internal examination of at least one forward double-bottom fuel oil tank, and by external examination of all other double-bottom fuel oil tanks on the vessel, that the general condition of the tanks is satisfactory.
( e ) All double-bottom fuel oil tanks on vessels 15 years of age or older but less than 25 years of age need not be cleaned out and internally examined if the marine inspector is able to determine by internal examination of at least one forward, one amidships, and one aft double-bottom fuel oil tank, and by external examination of all other double-bottom fuel oil tanks on the vessel, that the general condition of the tanks is satisfactory.
( f ) All double-bottom fuel oil tanks on vessels 25 years of age or older need not be cleaned out and internally examined if the marine inspector is able to determine by internal examination of at least one double-bottom fuel oil tank in way of each cargo tank, and by external examination of all other double-bottom fuel oil tanks, that the general condition of the tanks is satisfactory.
[CGD 84-024, 52 FR 39651, Oct. 23, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 32230, Aug. 24, 1988]
#### § 507.111 Notice.

The agency shall make available to employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the agency, and make such information available to them in such manner as the head of the agency finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by section 504 and this regulation.
EXHIBIT 10.2

                       DESCRIPTION OF REGISTRATION RIGHTS

During the three months ended June 30, 2004, the Company granted registration
rights to certain investors in connection with the sale and issuance to such
investors (the "Offering") of an aggregate of 4,450,000 shares of our common
stock and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,000,000 shares of our common
stock (collectively, the "Registrable Securities"). Such registration rights
provide that the Company shall file a Registration Statement covering the
Registrable Securities and, not later than June 30, 2004 ("Target Effective
Date"), the Registration Statement shall be declared effective by the Securities
and Exchange Commission. If the Registration Statement is not declared effective
on or before the Target Effective Date, then commencing on the first day of each
month following the Target Effective Date until the earlier of December 1, 2004
or the actual date the Registration Statement is declared effective, the Company
shall issue to the investor, as liquidated damages, such number of shares of our
common stock that equals 10% of the number of shares of our common stock
purchased by the investor in the Offering.

                                       34
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending January 26, 2008

----

Bank Holding CompaniesThe PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania  -- to merge with Sterling Financial Corporation, Lancaster, and for PNC Bank Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware, to merge with Delaware Sterling Bank & Trust Company, Christiana.					-Approved, January 24, 2008 					

Banks, ForeignState Bank of India, Mumbai, India  -- to establish a branch in Jackson Heights, New York.					-Approved, January 24, 2008 					

Discount RatesDiscount and Advance Rates  -- decrease in the primary credit rate from 4-3/4 percent to 4 percent by the Federal Reserve Banks of Chicago and Minneapolis, effective January 22, 2008.					-Approved, January 21, 2008 					Discount and Advance Rates  -- decrease in the primary credit rate from 4-3/4 percent to 4 percent by the Federal Reserve Banks of Atlanta and Kansas City.					-Approved, January 24, 2008 					Discount and Advance Rates  -- decrease in the primary credit rate from 4-3/4 percent to 4 percent by the Federal Reserve Banks of Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Richmond, St. Louis, Dallas, and San Francisco.					-Approved, January 22, 2008 					

EnforcementCoconut Grove Bank, Miami, Florida  -- isssuance of a consent order of prohibition against Aldo N. Morales, a former vice president, loan officer, and institution-affiliated party.					-Announced, January 24, 2008 					Traders Bank, Spencer, West Virginia  -- issuance of consent order of assessment of a civil money penalty.					-Announced, January 24, 2008 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: February 1, 2008
§ 502.318 Decision. ( a ) The decision of the administrative law judge shall be final, unless, within twenty-two (22) days from the date of service of the decision, either party requests review of the decision by the Commission, asserting as grounds therefor that a material finding of fact or a necessary legal conclusion is erroneous or that prejudicial error has occurred, or unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of service of the decision, the Commission exercises its discretionary right to review the decision. The Commission shall not, on its own initiative, review any decision or order of dismissal unless such review is requested by an individual Commissioner. Any such request must be transmitted to the Secretary within thirty (30) days after date of service of the decision or order. Such request shall be sufficient to bring the matter before the Commission for review. [Rule 318.]
( b ) Attorney fees may be awarded to the prevailing party in accordance with § 502.254. [Rule 318.]
[49 FR 44369, Nov. 6, 1984, as amended at 52 FR 6332, Mar. 3, 1987; 74 FR 50717, Oct. 1, 2009; 81 FR 10519, Mar. 1, 2016]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 30, 2018

No. 04-18-00723-CR

Michael P. CARACHEO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR17-040

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s attorney has filed a motion seeking access to a portion of the record that is 

sealed. The motion is GRANTED, and appellant’s attorney is directed to contact the Clerk of 

this court to make arrangements to review the sealed record. If the State desires to access the 

sealed record at a later date, the State also must contact the Clerk of this court to make the 

necessary arrangements. All parties and their attorneys are ORDERED: (1) to fully comply with 

the instructions provided by the Clerk of this court regarding their access to the sealed record; 

and (2) not to share the contents of the sealed record with any person except to the extent 

necessary to prepare their respective briefs.

In the event appellant or the State reference the sealed record in their respective briefs, 

they are ORDERED to (1) file their respective briefs in paper form only, (2) with a cover letter 

informing the Clerk of this court that the brief references the sealed record. See TEX. R. APP. P.

9.2(c)(3) (exception to electronic filing for documents under seal).

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of November, 2018.
___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Argued and submitted August 31,

affirmed September 27, 1995

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*CHARLES WAYNE CRUM, *Appellant.*

(94CR-0689; CA A84796)

902 P2d 138

Eric M. Cumfer, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *State v. Prickett,*136 Or App 559, 902 P2d 621 (1995).