alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 53.05-2 Relief valve requirements for hot water boilers (modifies HG-400.2). ( a ) *Relief valves.* The relief valve requirements for hot water boilers must be as indicated in article 4 of Section IV of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 53.01-1) except as noted otherwise in this section.
( b ) *Hot water heating boilers.* Each hot water heating boiler must have at least one safety relief valve.
( c ) *Hot water supply boilers.* Each hot water supply boiler must have at least one safety relief valve and a temperature relief valve or a pressure-temperature relief valve. The valve temperature setting must not be more than 99 °C (210 °F).
[CGD 81-79, 50 FR 9435, Mar. 8, 1985, as amended by USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65163, Oct. 31, 2008]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending January 6, 2007

----

Regulations And PoliciesComplex Structured Finance Activities  -- final Interagency Statement on Sound Practices Concerning Elevated Risk Complex Structured Finance Activities (Docket No. OP-1254).					-Announced, January 5, 2007 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: January 11, 2007
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1



                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



      NAME                                                                   JURISDICTION               % OWNED
      <S>                                                                   <C>                        <C>
               eVentures Latin America, Inc.                                 Delaware                   95%
               AxisTel Communications, Inc.                                  Delaware                   100%
                      Axistel Global Networks, Inc.                          Delaware                   100%
                      Axistel International, inc.                            Delaware                   100%
                      Axistel Media Services, Inc.                           Delaware                   100%
                      Axistel Metro, Inc.                                    Delaware                   100%
                      Web2Dial Communications, Inc.                          Delaware                   100%
                      Axistel Communications UK Ltd                          United Kingdom             100%
               eVentures Holdings, L.L.C.                                    Delaware                   100%
               e.Volve Technology Group, Inc.                                Nevada                     100%
                      e.Volve Technology Group de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.       Mexico                     100%
               Internet Global Services, Inc.                                Texas                      100%
                      Internet Streaming Video, Inc.                         Texas                      73.6%
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Interlink Electronics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, E. Michael Thoben, III, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ E. MICHAEL THOBEN, III                     
|E. Michael Thoben, III                         
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|May 5, 2004
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Significant loss ofsafety-related electrical power at Forsmark, Unit 1, in Sweden [electronicresource].**
 
NoticeSupplement 01
 
SuDoc Number:Y 3.N 88:56-2/2006-18
Item Number:1051-H-08 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000729525
 
January 15, 2020
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 1:07 PM

To: 'jon@strat-aero.com'

Cc: 'mfischer@matrixgrp.net'; Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - City of Roswell Coalition [FAA-2014-0732]

Dear Jonathan Adams:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA‐2014‐

0732).  This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

• List the maximum aircraft speed proposed for this operation, please include the airspeed type.  This

information can be located in the aircraft manual.          

         Provide a description of the proposed pilot medical requirements.

• Your petition references a safety pre‐flight checklist.  Describe the process used to determine if the UAS is

airworthy and in safe condition for operation in the NAS.  This information can be located in the aircraft

manual

• Your petition references the materials listed below, however the material were not submitted for the

record.  Please provide a copies of the following referenced materials:

o manufacturer's user guide for the SkyRanger UAS  

o SkyRanger UAS Operating Manual

o Coalition‐prepared UAS Flight Operations Manual

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e‐mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov.  If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 2/26/2015.  If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267‐9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202‐267‐9521
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OF Consolidated Medical Management, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of
-------------------------------------------------------------------
the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 1992 AND SECTION 1350 OF 18 U.S.C. 63.
----------------------------------------------------------------

I, Timothy G. Byrd, Sr., the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Accounting
Officer of Consolidated Medical Management, Inc. hereby certify that to my
knowledge, Consolidated Medical Management's periodic report on Form 10-QSB for
the period ended September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the periodic report on Form 10-QSB and the financial
statements contained herein fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of the operations of Consolidated Medical
Management, Inc.

     Date:  November 11, 2003          /s/  Timothy G. Byrd, Sr.

                                       Timothy G. Byrd, Sr.,
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       Consolidated Medical Management


<PAGE>
§ 56.50-103 Fixed oxygen-acetylene distribution piping. ( a ) This section applies to fixed piping installed for the distribution of oxygen and acetylene carried in cylinders as vessels stores.
( b ) The distribution piping must include a means, located as close to the supply cylinders as possible, of regulating the discharge pressure from the supply cylinders.
( c ) Acetylene distribution piping and pipe fittings must be seamless steel. Copper alloys containing less than 65 percent copper may be used in connection with valves, regulators, gages, and other equipment used with acetylene.
( d ) Oxygen distribution piping and pipe fittings must be seamless steel or copper.
( e ) When more than two cylinders are connected to a manifold, the supply pipe between each cylinder and manifold must be fitted with a non-return valve.
( f ) Except for the cylinder manifolds, acetylene is not to be piped at a pressure in excess of 100 kPa (14.7 psig).
( g ) Pipe joints on the low-pressure side of the regulators must be welded.
( h ) Branch lines must not run through unventilated spaces or accommodation spaces.
( i ) Relief valves or rupture discs must be installed as relief devices in the piping system if the maximum design pressure of the piping system can be exceeded. The relief device set pressure must not exceed the maximum design pressure of the piping system. Relief devices must discharge to a location in the weather at least 3 m (10 ft) from sources of ignition or openings to spaces or tanks.
( j ) Outlet stations are to be provided with suitable protective devices which will prevent the back flow of gas into the supply lines and prevent the passage of flame into the supply lines.
( k ) Shutoff valves must be fitted at each outlet.
[CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51201, Sept. 30, 1997]
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Douglas T. Watson, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of
Digital Video Systems, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;

4. 	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. 	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: April 12, 2004

/s/ Douglas T. Watson 
                           Douglas T. Watson
                       Chief Executive Officer
                      (Principal Executive Officer)

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WILLIE ROSE, #235893,

Petitioner,

CASE NO. 15-CV-11963

v. HONORABLE JOHN CORBETT O’MEARA

JEFFREY WOODS,

Respondent.

________________________________/

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

BUT GRANTING HIS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Before the Court are Petitioner’s motions for discovery and for extension of time to file a

reply to Respondent’s answer to the petition. For the reasons stated herein, the Court denies

Petitioner’s motion for discovery but grants his motion for an extension of time.

I. Discovery

Petitioner seeks discovery and lists information that he believes the Court will uncover

from transcripts and the parties involved in his state criminal proceedings. As a general rule, “[a]

habeas petitioner, unlike the usual civil litigant in federal court, is not entitled to discovery as a

matter of ordinary course.” Bracy v. Gramley, 520 U.S. 899, 904 (1997). At this time, Petitioner

has not made the requisite showing of “good cause” that his possession of the requested items are

necessary to the disposition of this case. Id. at 908; 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254, Rule 6(a). Petitioner

has already filed his habeas petition and supporting materials. Moreover, Respondent has

submitted the relevant state court materials pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section

1

5:15-cv-11963-JCO-APP Doc # 8 Filed 01/13/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 286
2254 Cases. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s motion for discovery. Should the Court

determine that any additional materials are necessary for the resolution of this matter after

reviewing Respondent’s answer and the state court record in more detail, it will enter an

appropriate order. Petitioner need not file an additional motion concerning this issue.

II. Extension of Time

Petitioner also seeks an extension of time to file a reply to Respondent’s answer due to

difficulties in obtaining his legal materials due to a prison transfer. The Court finds that

Petitioner has shown good cause for this request. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Petitioner’s

motion for enlargement of time. Petitioner does not specify an amount of time in his request, but

the Court shall provide him with an additional 60 days to file a reply to Respondent’s answer to

the petition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/John Corbett O’Meara 

United States District Judge

Date: January 13, 2016

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of

record on this date, January 13, 2016, using the ECF system and/or ordinary mail.

s/William Barkholz 

Case Manager

2

5:15-cv-11963-JCO-APP Doc # 8 Filed 01/13/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 287
#### § 38.15-1 Filling of tanks—TB/ALL.

(a) Refrigerated and semirefrigerated tanks shall be filled so that there is an outage of at least 2 percent of the volume of the tank at the temperature corresponding to the vapor pressure of the cargo at the safety relief valve setting. A reduction in the required outage may be permitted by the Commandant when warranted by special design considerations. Normally then, the maximum volume to which a tank may be loaded is:

*V*L = 0.98*d*r *V/d*L

where:

*V*L = maximum volume to which tank may be loaded.

*V* = volume of tank.

*d*r = density of cargo at the temperature required for a cargo vapor pressure equal to the relief valve setting.

*d*L = density of cargo at the loading temperature and pressure.

(b) Nonrefrigerated tanks shall be filled so that their filling densities shall not exceed the ratios indicated in table [38.15-1(b)](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-38.15-1#p-38.15-1(b)).

(c) The “filling density” is defined as the percent ratio of the weight of the gas in a tank to the weight of water the tank will hold at 60 °F.

Table [38.15-1](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-38.15-1)(b)—Maximum Permissible Filling Densities for Tanks Operating At or Near Ambient Temperature

| Specific gravity at 60 °F. | Maximum permitted filling density | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Unlagged tanks—water capacity | | Lagged tanks—all capacities |
| 1,200 gal. and under | Over 1,200 gal. |
| 0.473-0.480 | 38 | 41 | 42 |
| 0.481-0.488 | 39 | 42 | 43 |
| 0.489-0.495 | 40 | 43 | 44 |
| 0.496-0.503 | 41 | 44 | 45 |
| 0.504-0.510 | 42 | 45 | 46 |
| 0.511-0.519 | 43 | 46 | 47 |
| 0.520-0.527 | 44 | 47 | 48 |
| 0.528-0.536 | 45 | 48 | 49 |
| 0.537-0.544 | 46 | 49 | 50 |
| 0.545-0.552 | 47 | 50 | 51 |
| 0.553-0.560 | 48 | 51 | 52 |
| 0.561-0.568 | 49 | 52 | 53 |
| 0.569-0.576 | 50 | 53 | 54 |
| 0.577-0.584 | 51 | 54 | 55 |
| 0.585-0.592 | 52 | 55 | 56 |
| 0.593-0.600 | 53 | 56 | 57 |
| 0.601-0.608 | 54 | 57 | 58 |
| 0.609-0.617 | 55 | 58 | 59 |
| 0.618-0.626 | 56 | 59 | 60 |
| 0.627-0.634 | 57 | 60 | 61 |
| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| **Note:** Increase in filling densities to provide for seasonal changes may be considered by the Commandant upon presentation of factual evidence that safe operation can be effected. | | | |
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending November 1, 2008

|Filer                                  | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                             
|-------------------------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|CITIZENS BANCSHARES OF WOODVILLE, INC. | CIC           | Change in control notice by Norlin G. Boyum, Minneapolis, Minnesota, John B. Boyum, Arlington, Virginia, and Stephanie J. Boyum, New York, New York, as part of a group acting in concert, to acquire 25 percent or more of the shares of Citizens Bancshares of Woodville, Inc., Hudson, Wisconsin, and thereby indirectly acquire control of Citizens State Bank, Hudson, Wisconsin. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:11/14/2008
|Newspaper:                             | Not available
|Federal Register:                      | 11/14/2008   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending November 10, 2007

|Filer                     | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                  | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|ALLIANCE BANK CORPORATION | * Branch       | Alliance Bank Corporation, Fairfax, Virginia, proposes to establish a branch at 7023 Little River Turnpike, Annandale, Virginia. | Newspaper:11/16/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                | 11/16/2007    
|Federal Register:         | Not applicable
|CECIL BANK                | * Branch       | Cecil Bank, Elkton, Maryland, proposes to establish a branch at 4434 Telegraph Road, Elkton, Maryland.                           | Newspaper:11/30/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                | 11/30/2007    
|Federal Register:         | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Bowman, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Bowman*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 37.]

(No. 98-1373

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided December 2, 1998.)

*Peter Rosenwald,*for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.