alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 295.10 Eligibility requirements. ( a ) *Applicant.* Any person may apply to MARAD for Enrollment of Eligible Vessels in MSP Operating Agreements for inclusion in the MSP Fleet pursuant to the provisions of subtitle B, title VI, of the act. Applications shall be addressed to the Secretary, Maritime Administration, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20590.
( b ) *Eligible Vessel.* A vessel eligible for enrollment in a MSP Operating Agreement shall be self-propelled and meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) *Vessel Type* — ( i ) *Liner Vessel.* The vessel shall be operated by a person as an Ocean Common Carrier.
( ii ) *Specialty vessel.* Whether in commercial service, on charter to the DOD, or in other employment, the vessel shall be either: ( A ) a Roll-on/Roll-off vessel with a carrying capacity of at least 80,000 square feet or 500 twenty-foot equivalent units; or
( B ) a LASH vessel with a barge capacity of at least 75 barges; or
( iii ) *Other vessel.* Any other type of vessel that is determined by the MARAD to be suitable for use by the United States for national defense or military purposes in time of war or national emergency; and
( 2 ) *Vessel Requirements* — ( i ) *U.S. Documentation.* Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2)(iv) of this section, the vessel is a U.S.-documented vessel; and
( ii ) *Age.* Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2)(iii), on the date a MSP Operating Agreement covering the vessel is first entered into is: ( A ) a LASH Vessel that is 25 years of age or less; or
( B ) any other type of vessel that is 15 years of age or less.
( iii ) *Waiver Authority.* In accordance with section 651(b)(2) of the act, MARAD is authorized to waive the application of paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section if MARAD, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, determines that the waiver is in the national interest.
( iv ) *Intent to document U.S.* Although the vessel may not be a U.S.-documented vessel, it shall be considered an Eligible Vessel if the vessel meets the criteria for documentation under 46 U.S.C. chapter 121, the vessel owner has demonstrated an intent to have the vessel documented under 46 U.S.C. chapter 121, and the vessel will be less than 10 years of age on the date of that documentation; and
( 3 ) *MARAD's determination.* MARAD determines that the vessel is necessary to maintain a United States presence in international commercial shipping and the applicant possesses the ability, experience, resources and other qualifications necessary to execute the obligations of the MSP Operating Agreement, or MARAD, after consultation with the Secretary of Defense, determines that the vessel is militarily useful for meeting the sealift needs of the United States.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CRESTLINE CAPITAL CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AS OF THE THIRTY-SIX WEEK PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 10, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-10-1999
<CASH>                                          41,198
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,655
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         804,840
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,127
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 989,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        375,443
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           223
<OTHER-SE>                                     444,424
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   989,364
<SALES>                                      3,023,411
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,023,411
<CGS>                                        2,944,295
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,944,295
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,042
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,416
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,285
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,511
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,774
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,774
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.38



</TABLE>
# C_2014039EN.01000402.xml

| 8.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 November 2013 — European Commission v Council of the European Union

(Case C-196/12) (1)

1

(Action for failure to act - Annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants of the European Union - Staff Regulations - Adjustment of correction coefficients - Council decision - Refusal to adopt the Commission’s proposal - Failure to act - Inadmissibility)

2014/C 39/07

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall, D. Martin and J.P. Keppenne, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: European Parliament (represented by: A. Neergaard and S. Seyr, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and J. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze and J. Möller, acting as Agents), Kingdom of Spain (represented by: N. Díaz Abad and S. Centeno Huerta, acting as Agents), Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by C. Wissels and M. Bulterman, acting as Agents), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: E. Jenkinson and J. Beeko, acting as Agents, and R. Palmer, Barrister)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for failure to act — Council’s unlawful failure to adopt the Commission’s proposal for a Council Regulation under Article 3 of Annex XI to the Staff Regulations adjusting, as from 1st July 2011, the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants of the European Union and the correction coefficients applying thereto — Refusal to adjust correction coefficients relating to places of employment — Infringement of Articles 64 and 65 of the Staff Regulations and Articles 1, 3 and 10 of Annex XI to the Staff Regulations.

st

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Spain, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the European Parliament to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Spain, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the European Parliament to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 184, 23.6.2012.

1

---
§ 32.56-21 Openings in exterior boundaries: Accommodation, service, and control spaces—T/ALL. The following exterior boundaries of accommodation, service, and control spaces, except wheelhouses, must have no openings, and portlights must be of a fixed type with easily operable steel covers on the inside: ( a ) The exterior boundaries that face the cargo area.
( b ) The portion of the exterior boundaries within 3 meters (10 feet) or the length of the vessel divided by 25, whichever is greater, except that the distance need not exceed 5 meters (16.4 feet), of these boundaries.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 95 (Thursday, May 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2443]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patenable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel HH-91 SEP.
    Date: June 27, 2007.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 9 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Doubletree Hotel and Executive Meeting Center, Bethesda, 
MD.
    Contact Person: Lorraine Gunzerath, PhD, MBA, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 
Office of Extramural Activities, Extramural Project Review Branch, 
5635 Fishers Lane, Room 3043, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, 301-443-2369, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#caa3adbfa4b0afb8ab8aa7aba3a6e4a4a3a2e4ada5bc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e18886948f9b849380a18c80888dcf8f8889cf868e97">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 92.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 92.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 11, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2443 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 386.25 Enforcement, penalties and other laws.

Whoever shall be found guilty of violating any regulations in this part while in or on Academy property is subject to a fine of not more than $50 or imprisonment of not more than 30 days, or both (40 U.S.C. 318c). Nothing in these regulations shall be construed to abrogate any other Federal laws or regulations or any State and local laws and regulations applicable to any area in which the property is situated. These regulations shall be posted prominently throughout the Academy. Penalties for their violation shall be incorporated in the Schedule of Fines for Petty Offenses established by order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
EX-10.27.1



 






Exhibit 10.27.1








	 	 	 
	

	 	January 1, 2005






Carol A. Ammon

100 Painters Drive

Chadds Ford, PA 19317



Dear Carol:




     Reference is hereby made to that certain amended and restated employment agreement, dated as
of September 1, 2002 (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”), between you and Endo Pharmaceuticals
Inc. (the “Company”). Terms used but not defined in this letter shall have the meanings ascribed
to them in the Employment Agreement.



     Pursuant to Section 2.2 of the Employment Agreement, the Company hereby informs you that it
wishes to renew the Employment Agreement for an additional period of one year. If you are in
agreement, the Employment Period shall now cease on December 31, 2005, unless otherwise modified in
accordance with the terms of the Employment Agreement.



     All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect. If you are in agreement with this renewal, which shall be effective as of the date first
above written, please execute below.



	 	 	 
	

	 	Sincerely,
	 
	 	 
	

	 	 /s/ Jeffrey R. Black

	 
	 	 
	

	 	Jeffrey R. Black

Chief Financial Officer






ACCEPTED AND AGREED THIS 21st DAY OF JANUARY 2005:




/s/ Carol A. Ammon

Carol A. Ammon
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Central Federal Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: May 14, 2008
    /s/ Mark S. AllioMark S. AllioChairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending September 22, 2007

----

Discount RatesDiscount and Advance Rates  -- decrease in the primary credit rate from 5-3/4 percent to 5-1/4 percent by the Federal Reserve Banks of Boston, New York, Cleveland, St. Louis, Minneapolis, Kansas City, and San Francisco.					-Approved, September 18, 2007 					Discount and Advance Rates  -- decrease in the primary credit rate from 5-3/4 percent to 5-1/4 percent by the Federal Reserve Banks of Richmond, Atlanta, and Dallas.					-Approved, September 19, 2007 					Discount and Advance Rates  -- decrease in the primary credit rate from 5-3/4 percent to 5-1/4 percent by the Federal Reserve Banks of Philadelphia and Chicago.					-Approved, September 20, 2007 					

Regulations And PoliciesExpanded Examination Cycle  -- final interagency rules to allow an expanded examination cycle for qualifying state member banks and U.S. offices of foreign banks (Docket No. R-1279).                					-Approved, September 14, 2007 					(AC)Garnishment Orders  -- publication for comment of interagency guidance for financial institutions regarding garnishment of exempt federal benefits funds (Docket No. R-1294).					-Approved, September 18, 2007 					

Testimony And StatementsSubprime Mortgage Lending and Mitigating Foreclosures  -- statement by Chairman Bernanke before the House Committee on Financial Services.					-Published, September 20, 2007 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: September 27, 2007
#### § 249.10 Non-discrimination policy.

To administer effectively the policy regarding non-discrimination against U.S. insurers in other countries, as described in §§ 249.6(b)(3) and 249.7(a), MARAD seeks the assistance of the American marine insurance industry to provide information at the time of publication of Notice of Application described in § 249.7(b) concerning the existence of any discriminatory laws or practices in the marine hull insurance market abroad. Upon receipt of such information, MARAD will take whatever action it deems appropriate.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 91 (Friday, May 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26795-26799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2331]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 07-20]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 07-20 with attached transmittal and policy 
justification.

    Dated: May 7, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 26796]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN11MY07.009


[[Page 26797]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN11MY07.010


[[Page 26798]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN11MY07.011


[[Page 26799]]


[FR Doc. 07-2331 Filed 5-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-01-C
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 23, 2007 / Presidential Documents 29053 

Presidential Determination No. 2007–18 of May 9, 2007 

Presidential Determination on Transfer of Funds from FY 

2006 Economic Support Fund Account to the International 

Peacekeeping Account To Support Security Sector Reform in 

Liberia 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws 

of the United States, including section 610 of the Foreign Assistance Act 

of 1961, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’), and section 301 of title 3 of the United 

States Code, I hereby determine it necessary for the purposes of the Act 

that $11 million in FY 2006 funds made available under the Economic 

Support Fund account be transferred to, and consolidated with, funds made 

available under chapter 6 of part II of the Act, and such funds are hereby 

so transferred and consolidated. 

You are hereby authorized and directed to report this determination to 

the Congress and to publish it in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, May 9, 2007. 

[FR Doc. 07–2581 

Filed 5–22–07; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICESGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
# C_2014045EN.01000702.xml

| 15.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 November 2013 — Chelyabinsk Electrometallurgical Integrated Plant OAO (CHEMK), Kuzneckie Ferrosplavy OAO (KF) v Council of the European Union, European Commission

(Case C-13/12 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Dumping - Regulation (EC) No 172/2008 - Imports of ferro-silicon originating in China, Egypt, Kazakhstan, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Russia - Regulation (EC) No 384/96 - Article 2(9) - Export price - Article 3(5) and (6) - Determination of injury - Article 6(7) - Investigation - Article 8(4) - Offer of undertakings - Non-confidential version - Article 20(1) - Disclosure - Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, of the other part)

2014/C 45/13

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Chelyabinsk Electrometallurgical Integrated Plant OAO (CHEMK), Kuzneckie Ferrosplavy OAO (KF) (represented by: P. Vander Schueren, advocaat, and N. Mizulin, avocat)

Appellants:

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, Agent, assisted by G. Berrisch, Rechtsanwalt, and N. Chesaites, Barrister), European Commission (represented by H. van Vliet and M. França, Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 25 October 2011 in Case T-190/08 CHEMK and KF v Council, by which the General Court dismissed an application for partial annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 172/2008 of 25 February 2008 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of ferro-silicon originating in the People’s Republic of China, Egypt, Kazakhstan, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Russia (OJ 2008 L 55, p. 6) and, in the alternative, annulment of the Commission decision of 28 February 2008 refusing the then applicants’ request for suspension of the anti-dumping measures introduced by the contested regulation.

CHEMK and KF

Council

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Chelyabinsk Electrometallurgical Integrated Plant OAO (CHEMK) and Kuzneckie Ferrosplavy OAO (KF) to pay the costs of the present proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Chelyabinsk Electrometallurgical Integrated Plant OAO (CHEMK) and Kuzneckie Ferrosplavy OAO (KF) to pay the costs of the present proceedings;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 3.3.2012.

1

---
#### Lewis J. Phillips and others, *Executors, etc., Respondents, v.*Maria Davies, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc*.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Daniels J.