alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

  In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of POP N GO, (the "Company"),
  on Form 10-QSB/A for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mel
  Wyman, President and Sole Director (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
  Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of POP N GO. (the
  "Registrant"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
  2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

  (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)   The information contained in the Amended Report fairly presents, in all
  material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
  Company.

August 26, 2004

/s/Mel Wyman
--------------
Mel Wyman
Chairman, and Chief Financial Officer
(Principle Financial)
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending November 3, 2007

|Filer                     | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------
|HIGHLAND BANCSHARES, INC. | * 3A3          | Highland Bancshares, Saint Michael, Minnesota, to acquire 100 percent of Ridgedale State Bank, Minnetonka, Minnesota.                                                                                                                      | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:11/16/2007 
|Newspaper:                | Not available 
|Federal Register:         | 11/16/2007    
|STATE BANKSHARES, INC.    | 4c8            | State Bankshares Inc., Fargo, North Dakota, to acquire 91% of Lighthouse1, L.L.C., a limited liability company, Minneapolis, Minnesota and thereby engage in a permissible nonbanking activity under section 225.28(b)(14)of Regulation Y. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:11/19/2007
|Newspaper:                | Not applicable
|Federal Register:         | 11/19/2007    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 31.25-1 Load lines required—TB/OCL.

All tank vessels of 150 gross tons or over, or 79 feet in length or greater, navigating the oceans, coastwise waters, and Great Lakes are subject to the regulations in parts 42 to 45, inclusive, subchapter E (Load Lines), of this chapter, as applicable.

[CGFR 69-72, 34 FR 17481, Oct. 29, 1969]
# C_2013367EN.01001802.xml

| 14.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — RLvS Verlagsgesellschaft mbH v Stuttgarter Wochenblatt GmbH

(Case C-391/12) (1)

1

(Directive 2005/29/EC - Unfair commercial practices - Scope ratione personae - Misleading omissions in advertorials - Legislation of a Member State prohibiting any publication for remuneration not identified by the term ‘advertisement’ (‘Anzeige’) - Complete harmonisation - Stricter measures - Freedom of the press)

2013/C 367/31

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: RLvS Verlagsgesellschaft mbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Stuttgarter Wochenblatt GmbH

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Bundesgerichtshof — Interpretation of Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2005 L 149, p. 22), and in particular Articles 3(5), 4 and 7(2) thereof and point 11 of Annex I thereto — Misleading omissions in editorial-style advertising — Legislation of a Member State prohibiting a publication for remuneration which does not mention that it is an ‘advertisement’ (‘Anzeige’)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

In circumstances such as those of the main proceedings, Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) may not be relied on as against newspaper publishers, with the result that, in those circumstances, that directive must be interpreted as not precluding the application of a national provision under which those publishers are required to identify specifically, in this case through the use of the term ‘advertisement’ (‘Anzeige’), any publication in their periodicals for which they receive remuneration, unless it is already evident from the arrangement and layout of the publication that it is an advertisement.

---

(1)  OJ C 343, 10.11.2012.

1

---
§ 169.213 Permit to carry excursion party. ( a ) A vessel may be permitted to engage in a temporary excursion operation with a greater number of persons and/or on a more extended route than permitted by its certificate of inspection when in the opinion of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, the operation can be undertaken with safety. A “Permit To Carry Excursion Party” Form CG-949, is a prerequisite of such an operation.
( b ) Any Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, having jurisdiction may issue a permit to carry an excursion party upon the written application of the operator, owner or agent of the vessel.
( c ) The OCMI will reevaluate the vessel's sailing instruction program to ensure that the permit fits within the scope of the training program and that the vessel continues to meet the definition of a sailing school vessel.
( d ) The OCMI may require an inspection prior to the issuance of a permit to carry an excursion party.
( e ) The permit states upon its face the conditions under which it is issued, a reminder about the prohibition against carrying passengers, the number of persons the vessel may carry, the crew required, and additional lifesaving or safety equipment required, the route for which the permit is granted, and the dates on which the permit is valid.
( f ) The permit must be carried with the certificate of inspection. Any vessel operating under a permit to carry an excursion party must be in full compliance with the terms of its certificate of inspection as supplemented by the permit.
“aa CO

: rhe Express & Total Car Care

32954 WALKER ROAD INVOICE NOs aii9361

Sale Type: C AVON LAKE, GH 44212 WORK ORDER: 6&790286

. (440) 933-6622 lésc4 Pr O@9/E1/13

SERVICE
Cust Nums a Phone Nos
BRIAN HASSETT Car Model: 2209 Chrysler 30a
32678 ADMIRAL?S WAY Car Color: BLACK
License Nos FVF7G12 GH

AVON LAKE, OH 44012 V.IVN. § 2CSLASSVE9HS75 1235

Technician: 3147 Mileage: G352@
Promised: @9/21/13
Writers PAUL BUSSER oe -
Srve Adv: PAUL BUSSER ; :

Extendect
_ Total
CHECK ALL 4 TIRES, NG
AIR.
6) 1 FREE BRAKE INSPECTION/ESTIMATE
BI
FEE HRI SEE SEER ESE I STR IIR TRH
B) 1 22560R18 TIGER FAW TOURING ~ Mileage Warranty: 55, aaa
21324 BSW 12ZIH 1a6. 2a _ LEE. Be
1 FREE TIRE GUARANTEE PACKAGE
FTGP Se. 95 32.95
Tire mounting, new rubber valve stem (where
applicable), tire disposal, lifetime wheel
balance, lifetime rotation, lifetime flat
repairs, free wheel alignment check and free
tire replacements for road hazards down to
3/32 or.3 years whichever comes first... Reset
TPMS: wheel positioning where applicable.
Tire DOT Serial Numbers: YSE4C9UUE7IS Oty: 1
HEHK SARAH HH ENR AKER EERIE EA ERE RE LR ATR
ia) @ TFMS SENSOR - 12 Mth/12,@@a Lbr/24 Mth/24, aa Parts
4158 4,92 9. 6a
12A & NAPECH921129-TPMS SENSOR 123, 69 Bat. 76
Thank you for choosing Conrads AVON LAKE,
998) 1 OHIO TIRE FEE

OTF 1. 2@ 1. 2a
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 18

- 2633

_____________________________ E LAM H ARRIS III, Appellant,

v.
S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Edward P. Nickinson, Judge. August 5, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

. R AY , C.J., and K ELSEY and W INOKUR , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 148

To require random drug testing of Federal legislative branch officers and

employees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Oversight

A BILL

To require random drug testing of Federal legislative branch

officers and employees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Legislative Branch

5 Drug Testing Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. RANDOM DRUG TESTING IN LEGISLATIVE BRANCH.

7 Each House of Congress, and each other entity with8 in the legislative branch, shall require random drug testing

9 of officers and employees within their respective bodies.

Æ
§ 42.20-45 Length of superstructure. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the length of a superstructure (*S*) shall be the mean length of the parts of the superstructure which lie within the length (*L*).
( b ) Where the end bulkhead of an enclosed superstructure extends in a fair convex curve beyond its intersection with the superstructure sides, the length of the superstructure may be increased on the basis of an equivalent plane bulkhead. This increase shall be two-thirds of the fore and aft extent of curvature. The maximum curvature which may be taken into account in determining this increase is one-half the breadth of the superstructure at the point of intersection of the curved end of the superstructure with its side.
[CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10065, July 12, 1968, as amended by CGFR 68-126, 34 FR 9015, June 5, 1969]
# C_2013101EN.01001403.xml

| 6.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/14

---

Order of the President of the Court of 5 October 2012 — European Commission v French Republic

(Case C-143/12) (1)

1

2013/C 101/30

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 9.6.2012.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,716
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   66,522
<ALLOWANCES>                                       996
<INVENTORY>                                     70,312
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               156,534
<PP&E>                                         129,468
<DEPRECIATION>                                  72,980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 276,923
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           82,400
<BONDS>                                        133,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     40,000
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,856
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   276,923
<SALES>                                        258,474
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               258,474
<CGS>                                          199,197
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  199,197
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,665
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,826)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,550)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,276)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,276)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21

                  List of Subsidiaries as of October 31, 1996


The following is a listing of all subsidiaries of Able Telcom Holding Corp. as
of October 31, 1996:

Traffic Management Group, Inc.
        Transportation Safety Contractors, Inc.
        Transportation Safety Contractors of Virginia, Inc.
        Georgia Electric Company

Telecommunications Services Group, Inc.
        Able Communication Services, Inc.
        Able Integrated Systems, Inc.
        Dial Communications, Inc.
        H. C. Connell, Inc.

Communications Development Group, Inc.
        Able Telcom/TTI C.A.
        Able Telcom International, Inc.
        Seima Telecommunications, Ltda.
        Neurotechnology, Inc.
        Able Wireless, Inc.

Cable Communications Group, Inc.
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NetSolve, Incorporated (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David D. Hood, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David D. HoodName: David D. Hood Title: President and Chief Executive Officer




February 13, 2003
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending August 25, 2007

|Filer                                   | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   | End of Comment Period                                  
|--------------------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|Keystrong Financial, Inc.               | 3A1            | Formation of Keystrong Financial, Inc. Elderton, PA, a one-bank holding company for Elderton State Bank.                                                                                                                                                          | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                              | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                       | Not applicable
|PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., THE | * 3A5* 3A3     | PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, to acquire Yardville National Bancorp, Hamilton, New Jersey, and its subsidiary bank, Yardville National Bank, Yardville, New Jersey, and its 19.9% investment in Bucks County Bank, Doylestown, PA | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available  
|Newspaper:                              | Not available 
|Federal Register:                       | Not available 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Forth Quarter of 2007 (October 1, 2007 - December 31, 2007)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DOVER SADDLERY, INC. (the “Company”)for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006,, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers certifies, to the bestknowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Stephen L. Day /s/ Michael W. Bruns   Stephen L. Day Michael W. BrunsPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDirector *(Principal Financial Officer)**(Principal Executive Officer)*     Date: August 14, 2006 Date: August 14, 2006
#### § 4.11-1 Employees of vessels controlled by Army or Navy as witnesses.

No officer, seaman, or other employee of any public vessel controlled by the Army or Navy (not including the Coast Guard) of the United States, shall be summoned or otherwise required to appear as a witness in connection with any investigation or other proceeding without the consent of the Government agency concerned.
#### Boudreau *v.*Eastman.

When a suit is brought by an agent of an undisclosed principal in his own name, the writ may he amended by substituting the principal for the agent as plaintiff of record, or the principal may appear and prosecute the suit as plaintiff in interest; and the amendment may he made after the trial, without disturbing the verdict, when neither the course nor the result of the trial would have been changed by the amendment if it had been made before the trial.

Cask, for deceit in an exchange of horses. Facts found by a referee. The plaintiff had in his possession a horse belonging to> his brother, which he was authorized to dispose of as he chose. He exchanged it with the defendant for a horse belonging to one Gilman, which the defendant intended the plaintiff should suppose, and which the plaintiff did suppose, was the defendant’s. Nothing was said by either party about the ownership of either horse. The defendant was not authorized .to make the exchange; and the plaintiff having disposed of Gilman’s horse, Gilman brought an action of trover against him, which this plaintiff settled by the payment of $100. The defendant objected that the plaintiff’s brother should have been plaintiff.

*Farr*and Stevens, for the plaintiff.

*Bingham, Mitchell Batchellor,*for the defendant.

Bingham, J.

It does not appear to be material whether the plaintiff, or his brother, the undisclosed principal and plaintiff in interest, is plaintiff'of record. The writ may be amended by substituting the brother for the plaintiff *(Judge of Probate*v. *Jackson,*58 N. H. 458), or by an entry that the brother appears and prosecutes the action as plaintiff in interest. *Folsom*v. *O. F. Ins. Co.,*59 N. H. 54. As neither the course nor the result of the trial would have been affected by such an amendment if it had been made before the trial, it may be made now without a new trial. *Roulo*v. *Valcour,*58 N. H. 347. Let the record show the truth. When the amendment is made, there will be

*Judgment for the plaintiff.*

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.