alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 106 (Monday, June 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30812-30813]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2767]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders Special Emphasis Panel; Hearing and Balance.
    Date: June 25, 2007.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Christine A. Livingston, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National 
Institutes of Health/NIDCD, 6120 Executive Blvd.--MSC 7180, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-8683, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#acc0c5dac5c2cbdfcfecc1cdc5c082c2c5c482cbc3da"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cfa3a6b9a6a1a8bcac8fa2aea6a3e1a1a6a7e1a8a0b9">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication

[[Page 30813]]

Disorders Special Emphasis Panel; CDRC CONFLICTS.
    Date: June 26, 2007.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6120 Executive Blvd., 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Shiguang Yang, DVM, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDCD, NIH, 6120 
Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-8683.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 24, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2767 Filed 6-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
32.2
              CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350.
 
 I,
Timothy G. Byrd Sr., the Chief Financial Officer of Adino Energy Corporation,
hereby certify that to my knowledge, Adino Energy Corporation’s annual report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the periodic report on Form 10-Q and the
financial statements contained therein fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of Adino Energy
Corporation.
  Date: May
15, 2009
 
 /s/
      Timothy G. Byrd, Sr.Timothy
      G. Byrd, Sr.
Exhibit 32.1 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report Octillion Corp. (the Company) on the Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Terri DuMoulin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.  OCTILLION CORP.Date: January 11, 2007By:/s/ Terri DuMoulinTerri DuMoulin
President and Chief Executive Officer  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: William Solomon Lewis v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-13-00458-CR

Trial court case number: 59246

Trial court: 239th District Court of Brazoria County

Appellant’s Motion to Correct the Court’s Interpretation of the Notice of Appeal is 

DENIED. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

Acting individually

Date: January 29, 2014
Exhibit 32.2 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Octillion Corp. (the Company) on the Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harmel S. Rayat, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.  OCTILLION CORP.Date:  June 29, 2007By:/s/ Harmel S. RayatHarmel S. Rayat
Chief Financial Officer  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 71 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2344 

[Report No. 111–139] 

To amend section 114 of title 17, United States Code, to provide for agreements for the reproduction and performance of sound recordings by 

webcasters. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2009 

Mr. INSLEE (for himself, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. BOUCHER, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN

of California, and Ms. ESHOO) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JUNE 8, 2009 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To amend section 114 of title 17, United States Code, to 

provide for agreements for the reproduction and performance of sound recordings by webcasters. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2344 RH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Webcaster Settlement 

3 Act of 2009’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF AGREEMENTS. 

5 Section 114(f)(5) of title 17, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘2008’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘2008, the Webcaster Settlement Act 

9 of 2009,’’; 

10 (2) in subparagraph (E)(iii), by striking ‘‘to 

11 make eligible nonsubscription transmissions and 

12 ephemeral recordings’’; and 

13 (3) in subparagraph (F), by striking ‘‘February 

14 15, 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘at 11:59 p.m. Eastern 

15 time on the 30th day after the date of the enactment 

16 of the Webcaster Settlement Act of 2009’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS

pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 71 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2344 

[Report No. 111–139] 

A BILL 

To amend section 114 of title 17, United States 

webcasters. tion and performance of sound recordings by Code, to provide for agreements for the reproducJUNE 8, 2009 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
# C_2013038EN.01002101.xml

| 9.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2012 — A v Commission

(Case T-595/11) (1)

1

(Appeal - Staff case - Officials - Social security - Occupational disease - Total permanent invalidity - Access to the personal file - Reimbursement of travel expenses - Claim for damages)

2013/C 38/36

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: A (P., France) (represented by: B. Cambier, A. Paternostre and L. Levi, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and J. Baquero Cruz, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2011, A v Commission (F-12/09, not yet published in the ECR), and seeking to have that judgment set aside.

A

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | There is no further need to rule on the appeal in so far as it concerns the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2011, A v Commission (F-12/09, not yet published in the ECR), in so far as it concerns the application to set aside the decision of 28 April 2008 in as far as it refused to pay the provisional allowance provided for under Article 19(4) of the joint rules and to apply the provisions of Article 73(2)(b) of the Staff Regulations, and the application to order the Commission to pay the benefit provided for by that article; |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no further need to rule on the appeal in so far as it concerns the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2011, A v Commission (F-12/09, not yet published in the ECR), in so far as it concerns the application to set aside the decision of 28 April 2008 in as far as it refused to pay the provisional allowance provided for under Article 19(4) of the joint rules and to apply the provisions of Article 73(2)(b) of the Staff Regulations, and the application to order the Commission to pay the benefit provided for by that article;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the appeal;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 49, 18.2.2012.

1

---
Argued and submitted July 21,

reversed and remanded with instructions October 18, 1995

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*LEO GEORGE KRAMER, *Appellant.*

(DCR9313189; CA A83409)

903 P2d 420

Andy Simrin, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and David Leith, Assistant Attorney General. With him on the supplemental brief were Theodore Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Haselton, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded with instructions to vacate judgment of conviction and dismiss the accusatory instrument. *State v. Rudder/Webb,*137 Or App 43, 903 P2d 393 (1995).
# C_2014102EN.01000301.xml

| 7.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/3

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 October 2013 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Nagy Sándor (C-488/12) v Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Kormányhivatal, Lajos Tiborné Böszörményi (C-489/12), Róbert Gálóczhi-Tömösváry (C-490/12), Magdolna Margit Szabadosné Bay (C-491/12) v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal and Józsefné Ványai (C-526/12) v Nagyrábé Község Polgármesteri Hivatal

(Joined Cases C-488/12 to C-491/12 and C-526/12) (1)

1

((Request for a preliminary ruling - Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Implementation of Union law - Failure to implement Union law - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court))

2014/C 102/03

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Nagy Sándor(C-488/12), Lajos Tiborné Böszörményi (C-489/12), Róbert Gálóczhi-Tömösváry (C-490/12), Magdolna Margit Szabadosné Bay (C-491/12) Józsefné Ványai (C-526/12)

Applicants:

Defendants: Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Kormányhivatal (C-488/12), Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal (C-489/12, C-490/12, C-491/12), Nagyrábé Község Polgármesteri Hivatal (C-526/12)

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság — Interpretation of Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Unjustified dismissal — Dismissal without reasons being given — Official of a public administrative body dismissed on the basis of a provision of national legislation on the status of officials.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary).

---

(1)  OJ C 79, 16.3.2013

1

---
#### § 385.2 Scope.

Sections 385.2 through 385.9 set forth introductory information pertaining to the MarAd assistance regulations: Their purpose, authority, applicability, exclusions, issuance, arrangement, publication, and exceptions.
# C_2012126EN.01000401.xml

| 28.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/4

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gyulai Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 13 January 2012 — HERMES Hitel és Faktor Zrt. v Nemzeti Földalapkezelő Szervezet

(Case C-16/12)

2012/C 126/06

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Gyulai Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: HERMES Hitel és Faktor Zrt.

Applicant:

Defendant: Nemzeti Földalapkezelő Szervezet

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must the principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations, which are considered to be fundamental principles of European Union law, be interpreted as meaning that they preclude a Member State from adopting provisions which vary the content of a contract concluded by a Member State, in its capacity as proprietor, to the detriment of the other party to the contract, classifying the object of the contract as non-transferable and thereby preventing the other party from exercising the rights derived from the contract? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must the principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations, which are considered to be fundamental principles of European Union law, be interpreted as meaning that they preclude a Member State from adopting provisions which vary the content of a contract concluded by a Member State, in its capacity as proprietor, to the detriment of the other party to the contract, classifying the object of the contract as non-transferable and thereby preventing the other party from exercising the rights derived from the contract?

| 2. | If the first question is answered in the affirmative, is the national court obliged, by the principle of sincere cooperation laid down by Article 4(3) of the Treaty on European Union and the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, to disapply the domestic provision governing the legal position on non-transferability and declare the object of the contract transferable, contrary to the provisions of the national legislation? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the first question is answered in the affirmative, is the national court obliged, by the principle of sincere cooperation laid down by Article 4(3) of the Treaty on European Union and the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, to disapply the domestic provision governing the legal position on non-transferability and declare the object of the contract transferable, contrary to the provisions of the national legislation?

---
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending December 10, 2005

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|FIRST BANK        | * Branch       | First Bank, Strasburg, Virginia, to establish a branch on Route 50 Winchester, Virginia, in a development called Round Hill Crossing. | Newspaper:12/20/2005Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 12/20/2005    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable
|TRUPOINT BANK     | * Branch       | TruPoint Bank, Grundy, Virginia, to establish a branch at 709 Med Tech Parkway, Johnson City, Tennessee.                              | Newspaper:12/16/2005Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 12/16/2005    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending January 13, 2007

|Filer                 | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                                
|--------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|FAYETTE BANCORP, INC. | * 3A1         | Heritage Bancorp, Inc., Mason, Tennessee, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 50 percent of Fayette Bancorp, Inc., Mason, Tennessee, and thereby indirectly acquire Mason Bancorp, Inc., Mason, Tennesse and  Bank of Mason, Mason, Tennessee. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:            | Not available
|Federal Register:     | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
**EXHIBIT
32.1**
 ****
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**
  **PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  I, John
Stanton, the Chief Executive Officer of White Knight SST, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:
  (1) the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
  (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
White Knight SST, Inc. and will be retained by White Knight SST, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
  Dated:
      March 2, 2005/s/
      John StantonName:
      John Stanton
      Title:
      Chief Executive Officer