alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 515
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 515 appear at 67 FR 39860, June 11, 2002, and 70 FR 7669, Feb. 15, 2005.

§ 515.33 Records required to be kept. Each licensed or registered NVOCC and each licensed ocean freight forwarder shall maintain in an orderly and systematic manner, and keep current and correct, all records and books of account in connection with its OTI business. The licensed or registered NVOCC and each licensed freight forwarder may maintain these records in either paper or electronic form, which shall be readily available in usable form to the Commission; the electronically maintained records shall be no less accessible than if they were maintained in paper form. These recordkeeping requirements are independent of the retention requirements of other federal agencies. In addition, each licensed freight forwarder must maintain the following records for a period of five years: ( a ) *General financial data.* A current running account of all receipts and disbursements, accounts receivable and payable, and daily cash balances, supported by appropriate books of account, bank deposit slips, canceled checks, and monthly reconciliation of bank statements.
( b ) *Types of services by shipment.* A separate file shall be maintained for each shipment. Each file shall include a copy of each document prepared, processed, or obtained by the licensee, including each invoice for any service arranged by the licensee and performed by others, with respect to such shipment.
( c ) *Receipts and disbursements by shipment.* A record of all sums received and/or disbursed by the licensee for services rendered and out-of-pocket expenses advanced in connection with each shipment, including specific dates and amounts.
( d ) *Special contracts.* A true copy, or if oral, a true and complete memorandum, of every special arrangement or contract between a licensed freight forwarder and a principal, or modification or cancellation thereof.
[64 FR 11171, Mar. 8, 1999, as amended at 80 FR 68737, Nov. 5, 2015]
§ 169.732 Carbon dioxide and clean agent alarms. ( a ) Each carbon dioxide or clean agent fire extinguishing alarm must be conspicuously marked: “WHEN ALARM SOUNDS VACATE AT ONCE. CARBON DIOXIDE OR CLEAN AGENT BEING RELEASED.”.
( b ) Each entrance to a space storing carbon dioxide cylinders, a space protected by carbon dioxide systems, or any space into which carbon dioxide might migrate must be conspicuously marked as follows: ( 1 ) Spaces storing carbon dioxide—“CARBON DIOXIDE GAS CAN CAUSE INJURY OR DEATH. VENTILATE THE AREA BEFORE ENTERING. A HIGH CONCENTRATION CAN OCCUR IN THIS AREA AND CAN CAUSE SUFFOCATION.”.
( 2 ) Spaces protected by carbon dioxide—“CARBON DIOXIDE GAS CAN CAUSE INJURY OR DEATH. WHEN ALARM OPERATES OR WINTERGREEN SCENT IS DETECTED, DO NOT ENTER UNTIL VENTILATED. LOCK OUT SYSTEM WHEN SERVICING.” The reference to wintergreen scent may be omitted for carbon dioxide systems not required to have odorizing units and not equipped with such units.
( 3 ) Spaces into which carbon dioxide might migrate—“CARBON DIOXIDE GAS CAN CAUSE INJURY OR DEATH. DISCHARGE INTO NEARBY SPACE CAN COLLECT HERE. WHEN ALARM OPERATES OR WINTERGREEN SCENT IS DETECTED VACATE IMMEDIATELY.” The reference to wintergreen scent may be omitted for carbon dioxide systems not required to have odorizing units and not equipped with such units.
[USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33890, June 7, 2012]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 13 (Monday, January 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2712-2713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-252]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


Fourth Public Meeting for Reclamation's Managing for Excellence 
Project

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting and announcement of subsequent 
meetings to be held.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Bureau of Reclamation is holding a meeting to inform the 
public about the Managing for Excellence project. This meeting is the 
first of three meetings that will be held in 2007 to inform the public 
about the action items, progress, and results of the Managing for 
Excellence project and to seek broad public input and feedback.

[[Page 2713]]

Subsequent meetings in 2007 are planned.

DATES: February 27, 2007, 1 p.m. to 6 p.m., and February 28, 2006, 8 
a.m. to 12 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Marriott, 2101 Louisiana Blvd. NE., Albuquerque, New Mexico.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Miguel Rocha (303) 445-2841.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Managing for Excellence Project will 
identify and address the specific 21st Century challenges Reclamation 
must meet to fulfill its mission to manage, develop, and protect water 
and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound 
manner in the interest of the American public. This project will 
examine Reclamation's core capabilities and the agency's ability to 
respond to both expected and unforeseeable future needs in an 
innovative and timely manner. This project will result in essential 
changes in a number of key areas, which are outlined in, Managing for 
Excellence--An Action Plan for the 21st Century Bureau of Reclamation. 
For more information regarding the Project, Action Plan, and specific 
actions being taken, please visit the Managing for Excellence Webpage 
at http://www.usbr.gov/excellence.

Registration

    Although you may register the first day of the conference starting 
at 10 a.m., we highly encourage you to register online at http://www.usbr.gov/excellence, or by phone at 303-445-2808.

    Dated: January 4, 2007.
Brenda W. Burman,
Deputy Commissioner--External and Intergovernmental Affairs Washington 
Office.
[FR Doc. 07-252 Filed 1-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-M
2:15-cv-11717-SJM-MKM   Doc # 53-2   Filed 08/18/16   Pg 1 of 3    Pg ID 1648

2:15-cv-11717-SJM-MKM   Doc # 53-2   Filed 08/18/16   Pg 2 of 3    Pg ID 1649

2:15-cv-11717-SJM-MKM   Doc # 53-2   Filed 08/18/16   Pg 3 of 3    Pg ID 1650
Exhibit 3.2

                      Amendment of Articles: Name Change to
                       Telco Communication April 11, 1989









<PAGE>


  Change of Name
     RECEIVED                                                      FILED        
APR 11 AM 11:21 '87                                             APR 11 1989     
DEPARTMENT OF STATE                                          STATE OF COLORADO  
 STATE OF COLORADO                                          DEPARTMENT OF STATE 


                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

                                       TO

                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                            Cody Capital Corporation
                             A Colorado Corporation


     Pursuant  to  the  provisions  of  the  Colorado   Corporations   Act,  the
Corporation adopted an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation filed with the
Secretary of State of Colorado.

     1) The name of the Corporation is Cody Capital Corporation.

     2)  The  following  amendments  were  adopted  by the  shareholders  of the
Corporation  on  March  15,  1989,  in the  manner  prescribed  by the  Colorado
Corporations Act:

     The  shareholders  authorized  to change the name of the Company from "Cody
     Capital Corporation" to "TELCO COMMUNICATIONS, INC."

     3) The number of voting  shares  outstanding  was  2,061,000  and 1,457,000
outstanding shares were represented at the meeting.

     4) All 1,457,000  outstanding shares of the Corporation  represented at the
meeting voted for the amendment, none voted against.


                                   CODY CAPITAL CORPORATION



                                   By: [ILLEGIBLE}
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       President


                                   By: [ILLEGIBLE}
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Secretary
**Exhibit32.2**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of CompuMed, Inc. (the Company) on Form10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Phuong Dang, Controller(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CompuMed, Inc.and will be retained by CompuMed, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| /s/  Phuong Dang |
|-----------------------|

 

Phuong Dang

Controller (PrincipalFinancial And Accounting Officer)

August 4, 2003

 

 

----
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending October 4, 2008

|Filer                           | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------------------- | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|RIVERVIEW FINANCIAL CORPORATION | * 3A5       | Riverview Financial Corporation (In Organization) Halifax, PA, to acquire First Perry Bancorp, Inc., Marysville, PA, and HNB Bancorp, Inc., Halifax, PA.  The consolidation of holding companies will result in the merger of the two wholly-owned subsidiaries, The First National Bank of Marysville, Marysville, PA, and Halifax National Bank, Halifax, PA, subsequently forming Riverview National Bank, Halifax, PA | Newspaper:10/31/2008Federal Register:10/31/2008
|Newspaper:                      | 10/31/2008 
|Federal Register:               | 10/31/2008 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### P. Brewer v. The State.

*No. 6846.*

*Decided June 7.*

1. Malicious Mischief—Evidence.—On his trial for wilfully and wantonly wounding a hog, the accused, having adduced evidence which tended to show that he shot the hog in his field while trespassing on his crop, proposed to prove that his fence was a lawful fence, and that the stock or hog law prevailed in the territory within which his said field was situated, and that under the said law a lawful fence was not required to he a hog proof fence. *Reid,*that the proposed evidence was admissible to rebut the wilfulness and wantonness of the act, and its exclusion was error.

S. Same—Charge of the Court.—This prosecution was maintained under article 680 of the Penal Code. The evidence raised the issue whether the animal was wounded in the defendant’s enclosure, which enclosure was surrounded by an insufficient fence. Under such proof the court should have instructed the jury that if they so believed, the offense would be punishable under article 685 of the Penal Code, and that conviction could not be had under article 680.

Appeal from the County Court of Stephens. Tried below before Hon. D. W. Hullum, County Judge.

The opinion sufficiently states the case. The penalty assessed by the verdict was a fine of $5.

*W. Veale & Son*and *W. P. Sebastian,*for appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

White, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted under article 680 of the Penal Code of wilfully and wantonly wounding a hog.

Defendant proposed to prove, in connection with his other testimony, which went to show that the hog was shot by him in his field and while trespassing upon his crop: 1. That his fence was a lawful fence. 2. That *566what was known as “the stock or hog law” prevailed legally in the locality including his farm and premises, and that under said law it was not required, in order to make a fence lawful, that it should be sufficient to keep out hogs, etc.

On objection by the State this evidence was held inadmissible and was excluded by the court, and defendant saved his bill of exceptions.

The evidence was admissible as tending to rebut the wilfulness and wantonness of the act. Willson’s Crim. Stats., sec. 1169.

Again, upon the evidence as adduced the issue was clearly raised as to whether or not the animal was wounded in defendant’s enclosure, which enclosure was surrounded by an insufficient fence, and in such case the court should have instructed the jury that if they so believed, the offense would be punishable under article 685 of the Penal Code, and that a conviction could not be had upon the indictment charging the offense denounced by article 680. Payne v. The State, 17 Texas Ct. App., 40; McRay v. The State, 18 Texas Ct. App., 331.

Judgment is reversed and cause remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*

Judges all present and concurring.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      2,145,900
<SECURITIES>                                  496,300
<RECEIVABLES>                                     700
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            2,642,900
<PP&E>                                      7,254,500
<DEPRECIATION>                              1,490,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              8,455,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         878,900
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                  7,573,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                8,455,200
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1,713,200
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 924,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               65,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               471,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           471,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  471,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    2.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    2.92



</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

JESSICA RENTZ, 

 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-11513 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

 

STELLAR RECOVERY, INC., 

 

Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Plaintiff, JESSICA RENTZ, and Defendant, STELLAR RECOVERY, INC., 

by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate to dismiss the within 

complaint with prejudice, all matters in controversy having been resolved to the 

mutual satisfaction of the parties. Each party shall bear its own costs and 

attorneys’ fees. 

/s/ Jocelyn S. Hsiao 

Jocelyn S. Hsiao 

Attorney No. 6313077 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Allen Chern Law PLLC 

24100 Southfield Road, Suite 203 

Southfield, MI 48075 

Phone: (312) 940-8165 

Fax: (866) 359-7478 

Jhsiao@uprightlaw.com 

Steven A. Siman 

Steven A. Siman 

Attorney No. P20480 

Attorney for Defendant 

Steven A. Siman, P.C. 

3250 W. Big Beaver, Suite 344 

Troy, MI 48084 

Phone: (248) 643-4700 

Fax: (248) 643-7180 

sas@simanlaw.net 

Case 2:15-cv-11513-MFL-EAS ECF No. 14, PageID.54 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

JESSICA RENTZ, 

 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-11513 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

 

STELLAR RECOVERY, INC., 

 

Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

 Plaintiff, JESSICA RENTZ, and Defendant, STELLAR RECOVERY, INC., 

by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of the 

within complaint with prejudice, all matters in controversy have been resolved to 

the mutual satisfaction of the parties: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims against Defendant, STELLER 

RECOVERY, INC., are hereby dismissed, with prejudice, and without cost or 

attorneys’ fees to any party. 

 /s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: February 5, 2016 

Case 2:15-cv-11513-MFL-EAS ECF No. 14, PageID.55 Filed 02/05/16 Page 2 of 2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending June 3, 2006

----

 None 
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: June 8, 2006
#### § 4.05-35 Incidents involving nuclear vessels.

The master of any nuclear vessel shall immediately inform the Commandant in the event of any accident or casualty to the nuclear vessel which may lead to an environmental hazard. The master shall also immediately inform the competent governmental authority of the country in whose waters the vessel may be or whose waters the vessel approaches in a damaged condition.

[CGD 84-099, 52 FR 47534, Dec. 14, 1987]
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Atrion Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated: May 5, 2010                                                              /s/ Emile A. Battat
 Emile A. Battat
 Chief Executive Officer
  The foregoing certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and not for any other purpose.
Mar 07 11 05:45p NPCR 202 4G2-1924 p.2 

^^••* AmericanCoatings ^, V^TMENTOF 

© • © ASS(3CIAT10N • .Vr^)RfATO^^ 

':'. '^li -1 P i;; 31 

March 2, 2011 

Robert S. Rivkin 

General Counsel 

U. S. Depaitincnt of Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 2059U 

Dear Mr. Rivkin: 

The American Coatings Association, Inc. (ACA) is pleased to participate in the public meeting 

scheduled for March 14,2011 on the topic of "Regulatory Review of Existing DOT 

Regulations". ACA's Transportation and Distribution Committee would like to request time on 

the meeting agenda to discuss several topics, including: 

1. The incident reporting requirements for paint products; 

2. The application process for obtaining a Special Permit, renewal of Special Permit, 

gaining "party-to status" to a Special Permit; and 

3. several issues of international harmonization. 

All of these issues represent activities and/or requirements that are outmoded, ineffective, 

insufficient and/or excessively burdensome to the regulated community without providing any 

enhanced safety benefits to the public. ACA would appreciate at least 15 minutes to discuss 

these issues. 

ACA is preparing comments on these issues and will provide a more indepth discussion of these 

issues at the public meeting and in written comments submitted by the April 1 deadline. 

If you have any questions at all, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. 

Best regards. 

i'fSH or 

Heidi K. McAuliffe 

Senior Counsel 

1500 RHODE ISLAND AVENUt N.W. • WASHINGTON, DC 20005 ' T 202.462.6272 • F 202.462.8549 • WWW.paint.Orq