alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2494 

To designate 4 counties in the State of New York as high-intensity drug 

trafficking areas, and to authorize funding for drug control activities 

in those areas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2009 

Mr. MCHUGH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To designate 4 counties in the State of New York as highintensity drug trafficking areas, and to authorize funding 

for drug control activities in those areas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘New York/New Jersey 

5 High-Intensity Drug Trafficking Area Expansion Act of 

6 2009’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2494 IH

1 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF HIGH-INTENSITY DRUG TRAF2 FICKING AREAS IN NEW YORK. 

3 The counties of Clinton, Franklin, Jefferson, and St. 

4 Lawrence in the State of New York are designated as 

5 high-intensity drug trafficking areas and shall be part of 

6 the New York/New Jersey high-intensity drug trafficking 

7 area under the program administered by the Office of Na8 tional Drug Control Policy. 

9 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

10 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 

11 as are necessary for each of the fiscal years 2010 through 

12 2015 to carry out drug control activities in the areas des13 ignated by this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
---

---

# EXHIBIT 8.1

# Subsidiaries

|ENTITY                                      | PLACE OF INCORPORATION
|------------------------------------------- | ----------------------
|
|
|
|
|Cimatron Gibbs LLC*                         | United States         
|Cimatron Technologies, Inc.                 | United States         
|Cimatron Technologies, Inc.                 | Canada                
|Cimatron GmbH                               | Germany               
|Cimatron Sarl                               | France                
|Cimatron UK Ltd.                            | United Kingdom        
|Microsystem Srl **                          | Italy                 
|Cimatron Japan K.K                          | Japan                 
|Cimatron Technologies (P) Ltd               | India                 
|Cimatron (Beijing) Technology Co. Ltd.      | China                 
|Cimatron (Guangzhou) Technology Co. Ltd.*** | China                 
|Korea Cimatron Technologies Co. Ltd.        | Korea                 

* Cimatron Gibbs LLC is a wholly
owned subsidiary of Cimatron Technologies, Inc. (US) and was incorporated on December 20,
2007 under the name of Nortamic LLC. On January 1, 2008 Gibbs System, Inc. merged with and
into Cimatron Gibbs LLC, with Cimatron Gibbs LLC being the surviving entity.

** In June 2005 we completed the
acquisition of 27.5% of the share capital of Microsystem. In July 2007 we exercised option
to acquire up to additional 23.5% of the share capital of Microsystem. As of July 2007 we
hold 51% of the outstanding share capital of Microsystem.

*** We hold only 60% of the shares of
this joint venture.



---

---
§ 184.240 Gas systems. Cooking systems using liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and compressed natural gas (CNG) must meet the following requirements: ( a ) The design, installation and testing of each LPG system must meet ABYC A-1, “Marine Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Systems,” Chapter 6 of NFPA 302, or other standard specified by the Commandant.
( b ) The design, installation and testing of each CNG system must meet ABYC A-22, “Marine Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Systems,” Chapter 6 of NFPA 302, or other standard specified by the Commandant.
( c ) Cooking systems using Chapter 6 of NFPA 302 as the standard must meet the following additional requirements: ( 1 ) The storage or use of CNG containers within the accommodation area, machinery spaces, bilges, or other enclosed spaces is prohibited;
( 2 ) LPG or CNG must be odorized in accordance with ABYC A-1 appendix 4 or A-22 appendix 4, respectively;
( 3 ) The marking and mounting of LPG cylinders must be in accordance with ABYC A-1 appendix 7; and
( 4 ) LPG cylinders must be of the vapor withdrawal type as specified in ABYC A-1 section 1.7.
( d ) Continuous pilot lights or automatic glow plugs are prohibited for an LGP or CNG installation using ABYC A-1 or A-22 as the standard.
( e ) CNG installation using ABYC A-22 as the standard must meet the following additional requirements: ( 1 ) The storage or use of CNG containers within the accommodation area, machinery spaces, bilges, or other enclosed spaces is prohibited;
( 2 ) CNG cylinders, regulating equipment, and safety equipment must meet the installation, stowage, and testing requirements of paragraph 6-5.12 of NFPA 302.
( 3 ) The use or stowage of stoves with attached CNG cylinders is prohibited as specified in paragraph 6-5.1 of NFPA 302.
( f ) If the fuel supply line of an LPG or CNG system enters an enclosed space on the vessel, a remote shutoff valve must be installed that can be operated from a position adjacent to the appliance. The valve must be located between the fuel tank and the point where the fuel supply line enters the enclosed portion of the vessel. A power operated valve installed to meet this requirement must be of a type that will fail closed.
( g ) The following variances from ABYC A-1 section 1.12 are allowed for CNG: ( 1 ) The storage locker or housing access opening need not be in the top.
( 2 ) The locker or housing need not be above the waterline.
( h ) The following variances from NFPA 302 are allowed: ( 1 ) The storage locker or housing for CNG tank installations need not be above the waterline as required by paragraph 6-5.12.1.1(a);
( 2 ) Ignition protection need not be provided as required by paragraph 6-5.4.
Note to § 184.240 :
The ABYC and NFPA standards referenced in this section require the posting of placards containing safety precautions for gas cooking systems.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 1002, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by USCG-2000-7790, 65 FR 58465, Sept. 29, 2000]
Antidegradation discussion with Environmental Law and Policy Center (ELPC)

Thursday, July 15, 2010, 4:30-5:30 pm

EPA Headquarters

Attendees:

EPA OW - Janita Aguirre, Heather Goss

EPA OGC - Peter Ford

Outside groups - Albert Ettinger (Environmental Law and Policy Center), Matt Roda (Gulf 

Restoration Network-LA), and Kris Sigford (MN Enviro Advocacy-MN).

Topics covered:

Issue of coverage of "high quality waters"

Issue of triggers for Tier 2 review (related to permit limits)

Update on Minnesota from Kris Sigford

Update on Louisiana from Mat Roda
§ 272.43 Review and appeal procedures. ( a ) *Exclusive procedures.* Notwithstanding the audit appeal procedures of part 205 of this chapter, the provisions of this section shall be the exclusive remedy available to an Operator for the review and appeal of any disallowance of subsidy for a M&R expense claimed or any penalty assessed pursuant to § 272.31.
( b ) *Request for review.* An Operator may request review by: ( 1 ) The Director, Office of Ship Operations, with respect to any disallowance by the Region office of a claimed M&R expense, after receiving the notification required by § 272.41(c); or
( 2 ) The Director, Office of Financial Approvals, with respect to any disallowance of a claimed M&R expense, after receiving the notification required by § 272.42(b).
( c ) *Timeliness of request.* The Operator shall file all requests for review pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section within 60 days after the date of the audit notification. Any disallowance with respect to which the Operator fails to file a timely request for review shall be final and shall not be subject to appeal to the Board pursuant to paragraph (e) of this section.
( d ) *Notification of review determination.* The appropriate MARAD Office Director shall notify the Operator by letter, with respect to each timely filed review request, of the Director's determination and the reasons for each disallowance and whether the determination is final or subject to the submission of additional information.
( e ) *Appeal to the Maritime Subsidy Board* — ( 1 ) *Right to appeal.* An Operator may appeal a MARAD Office Director's final determination issued pursuant to § 272.32 (penalties) or § 272.43 (review of claims disallowance or of audit results) of this section to the Board in writing.
( 2 ) *Contents and timeliness.* The Operator shall set forth in any appeal the reasons for the Operator's objection to a penalty or disallowance of M&R subsidy and shall file such appeal with the Secretary of the Board within 60 days after the date of the notification sent to the operator by the appropriate Director pursuant to paragraph (d) of this section or § 272.33.
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 1-8, PageID.42 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 1-8, PageID.43 Filed 03/23/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 1-8, PageID.44 Filed 03/23/15 Page 3 of 3
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2470 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 19190 Cochran Boulevard FRNT in Port 

Charlotte, Florida, as the ‘‘Lieutenant Commander Roy 

H. Boehm Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2470 EH

1 SECTION 1. LIEUTENANT COMMANDER ROY H. BOEHM 

2 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 19190 Cochran Boulevard 

5 FRNT in Port Charlotte, Florida, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘Lieutenant Commander Roy H. Boehm 

7 Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lieutenant Com12 mander Roy H. Boehm Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 16, 2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2470 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostBuilding’’. tenant Commander Roy H. Boehm Post Office FRNT in Port Charlotte, Florida, as the ‘‘Lieu- al Service located at 19190 Cochran Boulevard
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted), H. Ravi Brar,
Chief Financial Officer of Pac-West Telecomm, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies
that, to the best of his knowledge:



1. The Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the
"Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
the Company.





In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hands
hereto as of the 10th day of August, 2004.







|/s/ H. Ravi Brar
H. Ravi Brar
Chief Financial Officer and Vice President Human Resources | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending October 22, 2005

----

Bank Holding CompaniesCitigroup Inc., New York, New York  -- request for an exemption from section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act.					-Granted, October 20, 2005 					

Board OperationsFederal Reserve Law Enforcement Officers  -- revisions to Board policy to establish more specific training requirements and to clarify when Federal Reserve officers can be cross-designated with local law enforcement authority (S-2627).					-Approved, October 20, 2005 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: October 27, 2005
#### § 30.10-20 Deadweight or DWT—TB/ALL.

The term *deadweight* or *DWT* means the difference in metric tons between the lightweight displacement and the total displacement of a vessel measured in water of specific gravity 1.025 at the load waterline corresponding to the summer freeboard assigned according to 46 CFR, subchapter E.

[CGD 74-127, 41 FR 3843, Jan. 26, 1976]
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                          MUTUAL RISK MANAGEMENT LTD.
                CONSOLDIATED RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         Year Ended December 31,
                                         -----------------------
                                     1999    1998    1997    1996   1995
                                     ----    ----    ----    ----   ----
<S>                               <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>    <C>

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges    6.6     9.6     8.4     7.1   13.9
                                    =====    ====    ====    ====   ====
</TABLE>

For purposes of computing the consolidated ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
"earnings" represent income before income taxes, minority interest,
extraordinary item and fixed charges. "Fixed charges" include gross interest
expense, the proportion deemed representative of the interest factor of rent
expense and preferred share dividend requirements of consolidated subsidiary
companies.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending December 10, 2005

|Filer                          | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------------ | ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|BEULAH BANCORPORATION, INC.    | * 3A3         | Beulah Bancorporation, Inc., Sioux Falls, South Dakota to acquire 100 percent of Valley Bank & Trust, Mapleton, Iowa.                                                                                                                                      | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:01/06/2006
|Newspaper:                     | Not available
|Federal Register:              | 01/06/2006   
|FISHBACK FINANCIAL CORPORATION | * 3A3         | Fishback Financial Corporation, Brookings, South Dakota, to acquire 100 percent of the outstanding stock of FMB Bankshares, Inc., Sioux Falls, South Dakota,  and thereby indirectly acquire First American Bank & Trust, N.A., Sioux Falls, South Dakota. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:01/06/2006
|Newspaper:                     | Not available
|Federal Register:              | 01/06/2006   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1431

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 30-percent

of gross income limitation applicable to regulated investment companies.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 6, 1995

Mr. FLANAGAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal

the 30-percent of gross income limitation applicable to

regulated investment companies.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF 30-PERCENT OF GROSS INCOME

4 LIMITATION APPLICABLE TO REGULATED IN5 VESTMENT COMPANIES.

6 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Subsection (b) of section 851

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limita8 tions) is amended by striking paragraph (3), by adding

9 ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph (2), and by redesignating

10 paragraph (4) as paragraph (3).
2

•HR 1431 IH

1 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—

2 (1) The material following paragraph (3) of sec3 tion 851(b) of such Code (as redesignated by sub4 section (a)) is amended—

5 (A) by striking ‘‘paragraphs (2) and (3)’’

6 and inserting ‘‘paragraph (2)’’, and

7 (B) by striking the last sentence thereof.

8 (2) Subsection (c) of section 851 of such Code

9 is amended by striking ‘‘subsection (b)(4)’’ each

10 place it appears (including the heading) and insert11 ing ‘‘subsection (b)(3)’’.

12 (3) Subsection (d) of section 851 of such Code

13 is amended by striking ‘‘subsections (b)(4)’’ and in14 serting ‘‘subsections (b)(3)’’.

15 (4) Paragraph (1) of section 851(e) of such

16 Code is amended by striking ‘‘subsection (b)(4)’’ and

17 inserting ‘‘subsection (b)(3)’’.

18 (5) Paragraph (4) of section 851(e) of such

19 Code is amended by striking ‘‘subsections (b)(4)’’

20 and inserting ‘‘subsections (b)(3)’’.

21 (6) Section 851 of such Code is amended by

22 striking subsection (g) and redesignating subsection

23 (h) as subsection (g).
3

•HR 1431 IH

1 (7) Subsection (g) of section 851 of such Code

2 (as redesignated by paragraph (6)) is amended by

3 striking paragraph (3).

4 (8) Section 817(h)(2) of such Code is amend5 ed—

6 (A) by striking ‘‘851(b)(4)’’ in subpara7 graph (A) and inserting ‘‘851(b)(3)’’, and

8 (B) by striking ‘‘851(b)(4)(A)(i)’’ in sub9 paragraph (B) and inserting ‘‘851(b)(3)(A)(i)’’.

10 (9) Section 1092(f)(2) of such Code is amended

11 by striking ‘‘Except for purposes of section

12 851(b)(3), the’’ and inserting ‘‘The’’.

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

14 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the

15 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
§ 35.35-5 Electrical bonding—TB/ALL. The use of a vessel/shore bonding cable or wire is permissible only if operationally necessary and only in compliance with the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. ( a ) A switch on the jetty that is in series with the bonding cable must be provided. The switch must be listed or certified by a Coast Guard accepted independent laboratory and approved for use in a Class I Zone 1 or Class I, Division 1 location, and the appropriate Gas Group of the cargo authorized for the vessel.
( b ) The connection point for the bonding cable system must be at least 20 feet from the cargo manifold area, the cargo hose string, or the vapor recovery connection. The switch must be in the off position before connecting or disconnecting the bonding cable. The bonding cable must be attached before the cargo hoses or arms, or the vapor recovery connections are connected. The bonding cable must be removed only after the cargo hoses or arms, or the vapor recovery connections have been disconnected.
[USCG-1999-5150, 78 FR 42642, July 16, 2013]
Order entered November 19, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01391-CV

IN RE ALEX PERRY NEAL, Relator

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 005-84128-2019

ORDER

Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Nowell

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relators’ petition for writ of 

mandamus.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of a forthcoming meeting of the National Security Education Board Group of Advisors. The purpose of the meeting is to review and make recommendations to the Board concerning requirements established by the David L. Boren National Security Education Act, Title VIII of Public Law 102-183, as amended.

# DATES:

June 7-8, 2007.

# ADDRESSES:

University of Denver, Room 301 Ben M. Cherrington Hall, 2201 S. Gaylord Street, Denver, CO 80208.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Dr. Kevin Gormley, Program Officer, National Security Education Program, 1101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1210, Rosslyn P.O. Box 20010, Arlington, Virginia 22209-2248; (703) 696-1991. Electronic mail address:                         *Gormleyk@ndu.edu.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The National Security Education Board Group of Advisors meeting is open to the public. The public is afforded the opportunity to submit written statements associated with NSEP.

Dated: May 15, 2007.

L.M. Bynum, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.

[FR Doc. 07-2502 Filed 5-18-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M