alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.16

CONSENT OF EXPERT

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the Form 40-F) of Cameco Corporation (the Corporation) to be
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

I hereby consent to reference to my name and my involvement in the preparation of, or supervision of the preparation of, scientific and
technical information in the following instances:



| | (a) | under the headings Operations and Projects  Uranium Operating Properties  Inkai, Mineral Reserves and Resources and Governance  Interest of Experts in the
Corporations Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2014 dated March 6, 2015 for the Inkai property; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | under the headings Our Operations and Projects  Uranium Operating Properties  Inkai and Mineral Reserves and Resources in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation for the year ended December 31, 2014 dated February 9, 2015 for the Inkai property,
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(collectively the Technical Information) in the Form 40-F, and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of information derived from the
Technical Information in the Form 40-F.

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such Technical Information in the
registration statements (Nos. 333-11736, 333-6180 and 333-139165) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Stock Option Plan, registration statement (No. 333-196422) on Form S-8 for the Cameco
Corporation Employee Share Ownership Plan and registration statements (Nos. 333-181577 and 333-200678) on Form F-10.

Sincerely,



|                                        |  | 
|--------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Darryl Clark                       
|Name: Darryl Clark, P. Geo.            
|Title:   General Director, JV Inkai LLP

Date: March 6, 2015
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of National Penn Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:
August 9, 2011

By:
/s/ Scott V. FainorName:
Scott V. FainorTitle:
President and

Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and not for any other purpose.
Presidential Documents

28581 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 97 

Monday, May 21, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of May 18, 2007 

Continuation of the National Emergency Protecting the Development Fund for Iraq and Certain Other Property in Which 

Iraq Has an Interest 

On May 22, 2003, by Executive Order 13303, I declared a national emergency 

protecting the Development Fund for Iraq and certain other property in 

which Iraq has an interest, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706) (IEEPA). I took this action to deal with 

the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign 

policy of the United States posed by the obstacles to the orderly reconstruction of Iraq, the restoration and maintenance of peace and security in the 

country, and the development of political, administrative, and economic 

institutions in Iraq constituted by the threat of attachment or other judicial 

process against the Development Fund for Iraq, Iraqi petroleum and petroleum products, and interests therein, and proceeds, obligations, or any financial instruments of any nature whatsoever arising from or related to the 

sale or marketing thereof, and interests therein. 

In Executive Order 13315, of August 28, 2003, Executive Order 13350 of 

July 29, 2004, and Executive Order 13364 of November 29, 2004, I modified 

the scope of the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 

and amended the steps taken pursuant to it. 

Because the obstacles to the orderly reconstruction of Iraq, the restoration 

and maintenance of peace and security in the country, and the development 

of political, administrative, and economic institutions in Iraq continue to 

pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign 

policy of the United States, the national emergency declared on May 22, 

2003, and the measures adopted on that date, August 28, 2003, July 29, 

2004, and November 29, 2004, to deal with that emergency must continue 

in effect beyond May 22, 2007. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) 

of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 

1 year the national emergency protecting the Development Fund for Iraq 

and certain other property in which Iraq has an interest. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES3
28582 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 97 / Monday, May 21, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted 

to the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

May 18, 2007. [FR Doc. 07–2564 

Filed 5–18–07; 1:57 pm] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES3GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
#### § 42.05-60 Recognized classification society.

The term *recognized classification society* means the American Bureau of Shipping or other classification society recognized by the Commandant, as provided in 46 U.S.C. 5107, and who also may be approved as a load line assigning and issuing authority.

[CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10052, July 12, 1968, as amended by USCG-1998-4442, 63 FR 52190, Sept. 30, 1998]
§ 174.320 Damage survival. A hopper dredge survives assumed damage if it meets the following conditions: ( a ) The maximum angle of heel in each stage of flooding must not exceed 30 degrees or the angle of downflooding whichever is less.
( b ) The final waterline, taking into account sinkage, heel, and trim, must be below the lowest edge of each opening through which progressive flooding may take place.
( c ) The righting arm curve calculated after damage must: ( 1 ) Have a minimum positive range of 20 degrees beyond the angle of equilibrium; and
( 2 ) Reach a height of at least 4 inches (l00mm) within the 20 degree positive range.
( d ) Each opening within, or partially within, the 20 degree range beyond the angle of equilibrium must be weathertight.
( e ) After flooding or equalization as allowed by § 174.325, the hopper dredge's metacentric height must be at least 2 inches (50mm) when the dredge is in an upright position.
**Letterof Transmittal**

           Minnesota Advisory Committee to      the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights

**Membersof the Commission**MaryFrances Berry, *Chairperson*CruzReynoso, *Vice Chairperson*ChristopherEdley, Jr.YvonneY. LeeElsieM. MeeksRussellG. RedenbaughVictoriaWilsonLesJin, *Staff Director*

TheMinnesota Advisory Committee submits this report, *TheStatus of Equal Opportunity for Minorities in Moorhead, Minnesota,*as partof its responsibility to advise the Commission on civil rights issues within thestate. The Advisory Committee unanimously adopted the report by an 11�0 vote.

Thisreport contains information received by the Minnesota Advisory Committee at apublic fact-finding meeting held in Moorhead, Minnesota, on May 25 and 26, 1999.The Advisory Committee is indebted to the individuals who testified at themeeting for their time and expertise and to the staff of the Midwestern RegionalOffice, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, for the data analysis and preparationof this report.

TheAdvisory Committee understands the Commissionis charged to study and collect information relating to denials of the equalprotection of the law, and trusts theCommission and the public will find the material in this report informative.

Respectfully,

AlanWeinblatt, *Chairperson*MinnesotaAdvisory Committee
Exhibit
32
  **CERTIFICATION**
 **PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 (SUBSECTIONS
(A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OFTITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE)
  Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Fusion Telecommunications, International, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:
  The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the "Form
10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
  ****Dated: May 16, 2005
    
    /s/ Marvin S.
  RosenMarvin S. RosenChairman of the Board and Chief
      ExecutiveOfficer
 ****Dated: May 16, 2005
    
    /s/ Barbara
  HughesBarbara HughesVice
      President of Finance and PrincipalAccounting and Financial
Officer
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: July 29 , 2015 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR– 2013 - 0602 FROM: Lora Strine , EPA SUBJECT: July 2 2 , 2015 Phone Call Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing

Power Plants

**SUMMARY** A phone call was held between EPA and Gabe Pacyniak, GCC on July 2 2 , 2015 to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants . The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES Georgetown Climat**  **e Center** Gabe Pacyniak **US EPA** Lora Strine Jeremy Tarr
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50687 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE DAVID SANCHEZ-MELGAR, also known as Jose David Ramirez-Sanchez, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-96-CR-67

- - - - - - - - - - February 21, 1997 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose David Sanchez-Melgar appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal re-entry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Sanchez-Melgar argues that a prior felony conviction is an element of the offense which must be alleged and proved to support an enhanced sentence under § 1326(b)(1). This court has held that subsection § 1326(b) is a sentencing enhancement provision rather than a separate offense. United States v. Vasquez-Olvera , 999 F.2d 943, 945-47 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied , 114 S. Ct. 889 (1994).No.96-50687 - 2 -
AFFIRMED.
# C_2013108EN.01001807.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/18

---

Order of the President of the Court of 16 November 2012 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session in Scotland — United Kingdom) — Andrius Kulikauskas v Macduff Shellfish Limited, Duncan Watt

(Case C-44/12) (1)

1

2013/C 108/43

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 109, 14.4.2012.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1



March 17, 2022



Via EDGAR



Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549



|Re: | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
                                  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Ladies and Gentlemen:



In connection with the Annual
Report of MV Oil Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as
the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to its knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                                            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





| | (2) | The information contained in the Report
                                            fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                                            of the Trust.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





The above certification is
furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part
of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



| | THEBANKOFNEWYORKMELLONTRUSTCOMPANY, N.A.
| | ----------------------------------------
| |                                         
| | Trustee for MV Oil Trust                







| | By: | /s/ ELAINAC.
    RODGERS       
| | --- | -------------------------------
| |     | Elaina C. RodgersVice President
#### § 30.01-2 OMB control numbers assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

(a) *Purpose.* This section collects and displays the control numbers assigned to information collection and recordkeeping requirements in this subchapter by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). The Coast Guard intends that this section comply with the requirements of 44 U.S.C. 3507(f) which requires that agencies display a current control number assigned by the Director of the OMB for each approved agency information collection requirement.

(b) *Display.*

| 46 CFR part or section where identified or described | Current OMB control No. |
| --- | --- |
| § 31.10-5(a) | 1625-0038 |
| § 31.10-21 | 1625-0032 |
| § 31.10-22 | 1625-0032 |
| § 31.10-32 | 1625-0038 |
| § 31.10-33 | 1625-0038 |
| § 31.37-15 | 1625-0038 |
| § 31.40-35 | 1625-0038 |
| § 35.20-7 | 1625-0064 |
| § 35.35-30 | 1625-0039 |
| § 39.10-13 | 1625-0038 |

[49 FR 38120, Sept. 27, 1984, as amended by CGD 89-037, 57 FR 41821, Sept. 11, 1992; USCG-2004-18884, 69 FR 58345, Sept. 30, 2004]
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00459

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF M.K., A C HILD §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 211th District Court

of Denton County (15

- 02179

- 211)

April 23, 2020

Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

This cour t has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By __ /s/ Elizabeth Kerr

_________________ Justice Elizabeth Kerr
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Sharon Gandy-Micheau, 

Defendant. 

________________________________/

Case No. 15-20338 

Judith E. Levy 

United States District Judge 

Mag. Judge Mona K. Majzoub 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR 

COMPASSIONATE RELEASE AND REQUEST FOR A HEARING 

[270] 

 This case is before the Court on Defendant’s motion for 

compassionate release. (ECF No. 270.) On January 4, 2021, a hearing 

was held by video conference and oral argument was heard. For the 

reasons set forth on the record, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. 

Defendant’s sentence of imprisonment is reduced to time served. 

Upon release by the Bureau of Prisons, Defendant must immediately selfquarantine at her residence for 14-days. The term of supervised release 

and all other conditions of supervised release remain unchanged. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Case 5:15-cr-20338-JEL-MKM ECF No. 284, PageID.4041 Filed 01/05/21 Page 1 of 2
Dated: January 5, 2021 s/Judith E. Levy 

Ann Arbor, Michigan JUDITH E. LEVY 

United States District Judge 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served 

upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court s 

ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses 

disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on January 5, 2021. 

s/William Barkholz 

WILLIAM BARKHOLZ 

Case Manager 

Case 5:15-cr-20338-JEL-MKM ECF No. 284, PageID.4042 Filed 01/05/21 Page 2 of 2
#### § 502.212 Exceptions to rulings of presiding officer unnecessary.

A formal exception to a ruling or order is unnecessary. When the ruling or order is requested or made, the party doing so need only state the action that it wants the presiding officer to take or that it objects to, along with the grounds for the request or objection. Failing to object does not prejudice a party who had no opportunity to do so when the ruling or order was made. [Rule 212.]
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 38

 40

 42

 44

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

07/31

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1180 

CAF 11-01008 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, SCONIERS, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF JUSTIN LINDELL, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

LYDIA BEARFIELD, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

 

ERICKSON WEBB SCOLTON & HAJDU, LAKEWOOD (LYLE T. HAJDU OF COUNSEL),

FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

MICHAEL J. SULLIVAN, FREDONIA, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

ALLISON B. MULLEN CARROW, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, JAMESTOWN, FOR

ALLONA B. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Chautauqua County

(Judith S. Claire, J.), entered August 16, 2010 in a proceeding

pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order awarded the parties

joint custody of their child, with placement to petitioner. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs. 

Entered: November 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
EXECUTION VERSION


                                    GUARANTEE

         For value received, each Guarantor (which term includes any successor
Person under the Indenture) has, jointly and severally, unconditionally
guaranteed, to the extent set forth in the Indenture and subject to the
provisions in the Indenture dated as of February 13, 2004 (the "Indenture")
among Ormat Funding Corp., the Guarantors listed on the signature page thereto,
Ormesa LLC and Union Bank of California, N.A., as trustee (the "Trustee"), (a)
the due and punctual payment of the principal of, premium, Liquidated Damages,
if any, and interest on the Senior Secured Notes (as defined in the Indenture),
whether at maturity, by acceleration, redemption or otherwise, the due and
punctual payment of interest on overdue principal, premium, Liquidated Damages,
and, to the extent permitted by law, interest, and the due and punctual
performance of all other obligations of the Issuer to the Holders or the Trustee
all in accordance with the terms of the Indenture and (b) in case of any
extension of time of payment or renewal of any Senior Secured Notes or any of
such other obligations, that the same will be promptly paid in full when due or
performed in accordance with the terms of the extension or renewal, whether at
stated maturity, by acceleration or otherwise. The obligations of the Guarantors
to the Holders of Senior Secured Notes and to the Trustee pursuant to the
Guarantee and the Indenture are expressly set forth in Article IX of the
Indenture and reference is hereby made to the Indenture for the precise terms of
the Guarantee. Each Holder of a Senior Secured Note, by accepting the same, (a)
agrees to and shall be bound by such provisions and (b) appoints the Trustee
attorney-in-fact of such Holder for such purpose.

                            [Signature Page Follows]














                                           ORMESA LLC


                                           By:  ORMAT FUNDING CORP.,
                                           sole member and manager of Ormesa LLC


                                           By: /s/ Yehudit Bronicki
                                               ---------------------------------
                                           Name: Yehudit Bronicki
                                           Title: President
                                           Date: 12-31-2004
GAO-01-169R Paralyzed Veterans of America

United States General Accounting Office

Washington, DC 20548

October 27, 2000

The Honorable Henry J. Hyde

Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary

House of Representatives

Subject: Federally Chartered Corporation: Review of the Financial Statement Audit

Report for the Paralyzed Veterans of America for Fiscal Years 1999 and

1998

Dear Mr. Chairman:

As requested, we reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of the

Paralyzed Veterans of America, a federally chartered corporation, for the fiscal years

ended September 30, 1999 and 1998. The corporation’s purpose is to form a national

association for the benefit of persons who have suffered injuries or diseases of the

spinal cord, acquaint the public with the needs and problems of paraplegics, and

promote medical research in the several fields connected with injuries and diseases

of the spinal cord.

Federally chartered corporations are required under 36 U.S.C. 10101 to

• present the corporation’s assets and liabilities and reasonable detail on the

corporation’s income and expenses in annual financial statements,

• obtain an annual financial audit by an independent public accountant, and

• submit the auditors’ report and the corporation’s financial statements to the

Congress.

The objective of our review was to determine whether the audit report complied with

the financial reporting requirements of the law. In carrying out our work, we

reviewed the corporation’s financial statements and the accompanying notes,

performed certain analytical procedures related to information presented in the

financial statements, reviewed the auditors’ report, and made inquiries to corporation

officials or the auditors as we deemed necessary. We did not review the auditors’

working papers. Our review disclosed no reportable instances of noncompliance.
Page 2 GAO-01-169R Paralyzed Veterans of America

The audit report included the auditors’ opinion that the financial statements of the

corporation were presented fairly in accordance with generally accepted accounting

principles. We are returning the audit report you sent with your letter.

Sincerely yours,

Jeffrey C. Steinhoff

Managing Director

Financial Management and Assurance

Enclosure

(912014)