alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.17

CONSENT OF EXPERT

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F
(the Form 40-F) of Cameco Corporation (the Corporation) to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

I hereby consent to reference to my name and my involvement in the preparation of, or supervision of the preparation of, scientific and
technical information in the following instances:



| | (a) | under the headings Operations and Development Projects  Uranium Development Project  Cigar Lake, Mineral Reserves and Resources and
Governance  Interest of Experts in the Corporations Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2012 dated February 22, 2013 for the Cigar Lake property; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | under the headings Our Operations and Development Projects  Uranium Development Project  Cigar Lake and Mineral Reserves and
Resources in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation for the year ended December 31, 2012 dated February 11, 2013 for the Cigar Lake property,
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(collectively the Technical Information) in the Form 40-F, and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of information derived from
the Technical Information in the Form 40-F.

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such Technical
Information in the registration statements (Nos. 333-11736, 333-6180 and 333-139165) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Stock Option Plan, registration statement (No. 333-139324) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Employee Share Ownership
Plan and registration statement (No.333-181577) on Form F-10.

Sincerely,



|                 |  |                                                                                 
|---------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Eric Paulsen
|Name:            |  | Eric Paulsen, P. Eng., Pr. Eng.                                                 
|Title:           |  | Interim Chief Metallurgist, Cameco Technology and Innovation, Cameco Corporation
|                 | 
|Date:            |  | February 22, 2013
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.133-19 Operating instructions and information for the ship's training manual. ( a ) Each release mechanism must have instructions and information for the ship's training manual that use the symbols from IMO Res. A.760(18) (incorporated by reference, see § 160.133-5 of this subpart) to describe the location and operation of the release mechanism.
( b ) The instructions and information required by paragraph (a) of this section may be combined with similar material for survival craft and rescue boats, and their launching systems.
( c ) The release mechanism manufacturer must make the instructions and information required by paragraph (a) of this section available— ( 1 ) In English to purchasers of release mechanisms approved by the Coast Guard; and
( 2 ) In the form of an instruction placard providing simple procedures and illustrations for operation of the release mechanism. The placard must be not greater than 36 cm (14 in) by 51 cm (20 in), and must be made of durable material and suitable for display inside a lifeboat and rescue boat and/or near launching appliances on vessels.
#### § 35.35-25 Approval to start transfer of cargo—TB/ALL.

When the person in charge of the transfer of liquid cargo in bulk has ensured that the requirements of §§ 35.35-20 and 35.35-30 have been met, he or she may give approval to start the transfer.

[CGD 79-116, 60 FR 17156, Apr. 4, 1995]
EXHIBIT 23.1



                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
    Interlink Electronics, Inc.:

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated March 9, 1998 included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statement. It should be noted that we have not
audited any financial statements of the Company subsequent to December 31, 1997
or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.



                                       ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

                                       Arthur Andersen LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 23, 1998
**1**

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 

### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court Cause No. DA 23
- 0138

**____________________________________________________** IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF ) ) JACQUILINE STEINMANN , ) ) Petitioner/Appell ee , ) ) **ORDER FOR** ) **EXTENSION**

- and

- ) ) BRETT STEINMANN, ) ) Respondent/Appell ant
. )
UPON review of the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief by counsel for the Respondent/Appellant herein and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time to file Appellant’s Opening Brief is extended to the 20 th day of July, 2023.

**ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND DATED BELOW**

cc: Karl Knuchel Christopher Gillette

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 20 2023

06/20/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0138
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              MAY-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                         243,094
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  917,492
<ALLOWANCES>                                   300,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,658,788
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,777,494
<PP&E>                                       1,791,661
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,159,702
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,581,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,854,670
<BONDS>                                      2,690,357
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       161,429
<OTHER-SE>                                     874,602
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,581,058
<SALES>                                      4,653,305
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,653,305
<CGS>                                        2,679,255
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,409,891
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,863,127
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               300,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             104,894
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,382,700)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,382,700)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                833,149
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,549,551)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.43)


</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   EXHIBIT 21

              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF NANOPIERCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


--------------------------------------------------------------------
                       STATE OF      DATE OF
      NAME          INCORPORATION  INCORPORATION  DOING BUSINESS AS
--------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                 <C>            <C>            <C>
NanoPierce Card     Germany        January 2000   NanoPierce Card
Technologies, GmbH                                Technologies, GmbH
--------------------------------------------------------------------
NanoPierce          Nevada, USA    January 2002   NanoPierce
Connection                                        Connection
Systems, Inc.                                     Systems, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
ExypnoTech, GmbH    Germany        February 2002  ExypnoTech, GmbH
--------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


<PAGE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 9, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-10440 Conference Calendar

TRACEY DEMARK GARRETT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CHUCK NORRIS, also known as Carlos Ray Norris; AARON NORRIS; BOB GORKIN; MORRIS BROTHERS; CLERANCE GILYARD, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:01-CV-1566-D

-------------------- Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Tracey Garrett, federal prisoner no. 31079-077, appeals the dismissal as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A of his action brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Garrett alleged that actor Chuck Norris and numerous employees of the television show “Walker, Texas Ranger” violated his civil rights by acting as federal law enforcement officers, arresting andNo. 02-10440 -2- harassing him on camera, and causing humiliating photographs of him to be published in People magazine. Garrett’s action is time-barred and was properly dismissed as frivolous. See Gonzales v. Wyatt , 157 F.3d 1016, 1019-20 (5th Cir. 1998). In addition, Garrett’s attempts to argue on appeal for tolling the limitation period or beginning it at a later date lack any arguable merit. Accordingly, this appeal is
DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. The district court’s dismissal and the dismissal of this appeal as frivolous both count as strikes for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). We caution Garrett that once he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
APPEAL DISMISSED; THREE-STRIKES WARNING ISSUED.
**EXHIBIT
31.2**
  **CERTIFICATION**
  I, John
Stanton, certify that:
  1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of White Knight SST, Inc.;
  2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4. The
small business issuer s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:
  a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer , including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer s disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures , as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  c)
disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer s internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer
s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer s fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer s internal control over financial
reporting; and
  5. The
small business issuer s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer s
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the small business issuer s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the small business
issuer s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
  b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting.
  March
      2, 2005/s/
      John StantonName:
      John Stanton
      Title:
      Chief Executive Officer
§ 355.1 General. ( a ) Under section 2, Shipping Act, 1916, as amended and section 905(c), Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended, no corporation is deemed to be a citizen of the United States unless: ( 1 ) It is organized under the laws of the United States or of a State, Territory, District, or possession thereof;
( 2 ) Its chief executive officer, by whatever title, and the chairman of its board of directors are citizens of the United States, and no more of its directors than a minority of the number necessary to constitute a quorum are non-citizens (except that in the case of corporations under title VI, Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended, all directors must be citizens of the United States) and
( 3 ) The controlling interest therein is owned by citizens of the United States or, in the case of a corporation operating any vessel in the coastwise trade, on the Great Lakes, or inland lakes of the United States, 75 per centum of the interest in such corporation is owned by citizens of the United States.
( b ) As used in this part, the term “primary corporation” includes, but not exclusively, an applicant, for, or one already receiving, benefits under the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended, as well as participants in certain transactions, such as banking institutions designated as lenders, mortgagees, and trustees pursuant to Public Law 89-346 (73 Stat. 597), as amended.
( c ) To satisfy the statutory requirements, an Affidavit of U.S. Citizenship of a primary corporation by one of its officers duly authorized to execute such Affidavit, should be submitted. This affidavit should contain facts from which the corporation's citizenship can be determined. MARAD will accept electronic options (such as facsimile and Internet) for transmission of required information to MARAD, if practicable.
[G.O. 89, Rev., 35 FR 11558, July 18, 1970, as amended at 68 FR 62538, Nov. 5, 2003; 69 FR 34311, June 21, 2004; 69 FR 61451, Oct. 19, 2004]
#### Hammond, Plaintiff in Error, v. Herdman, Defendant in E. ror.

1. Appellate Pbacticb.

When the record is not prepared in conformity with the rules of court, the writ of error will be dismissed.

2. Same.

Assignments of error based upon the giving of certain instructions will not be considered when all the instructions are not preserved in the record.

3. Same.

Where there are no pleadings, and the evidence on which the case was tried is not preserved, the court’s charge to the jury will not be reviewed. •

*Error to the County Court of Otero County.*

Mr. Platt Wicks and Mr. A. F. Thompson, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. James Hoffmire, for defendant in error.

Per Curiam.

This case was originally brought before a justice of the peace in Otero county to recover the value of a portion of a crop which was sold to the plaintiff in error by one Hansbrough. From the judgment which was rendered by the justice, an appeal was taken to the county court, and Herdman'there got judgment against Hammond for $38.98, and the case was brought here by writ of error.

*380The writ of error must be dismissed without an adjudication of the questions discussed by the plaintiff in error, for the want of a record which is in conformity with the rules, or sufficient to enable the court to pass on them. There is no bill of exceptions, and the evidence introduced on the hearing is not before the court, and since the case originated before a justice, the issues are not preserved by pleadings. Under these circumstanues, the court is unable to determine just what the controversy was, or what case the parties attempted to present. The abstract contains nothing but the instructions of the court. The error is laid on these instructions, and it is insisted that the cause must be reversed, because the court failed to state the law correctly. There are many reasons why this contention is.not well founded. In the first place, the record does not necessarily show that all the instructions are contained in what is certified to this court. It has been repeatedly decided bj' the supreme court that a case will not be reversed because of alleged error in respect of these matters, unless all the instructions are preserved in the record. *Dawson v. Coston,*18 Colo. 493.

It is equally manifest that where there are no pleadings, and none of the evidence is preserved on which the case was tried, it is impossible to determine the sufficiency, the accuracy, or the impropriety of the court’s charge to the jury.

The record is not presented in such form as to entitle the parties to a discussion or a determination of the questions which they argue, and the writ of error must be dismissed.

*Dismissed.*
§ 28.365 Overcurrent protection and switched circuits. ( a ) Each power source must be protected against overcurrent. Overcurrent devices for generators must be set at a value not exceeding 115 percent of the generator full load rating.
( b ) Except for a steering circuit, each circuit must be protected against both overload and short circuit. Each overcurrent device in a steering system power and control circuit must provide short circuit protection only.
( c ) Each ungrounded current carrying conductor must be protected in accordance with its current carrying capacity by a circuit breaker or fuse at the connection to the switchboard or distribution panel bus.
( d ) Each circuit breaker and each switch must simultaneously open all ungrounded conductors.
( e ) The grounded conductor of a circuit must not be disconnected by a switch or an overcurrent device unless all ungrounded conductors of the circuit are simultaneously disconnected.
( f ) Navigation light circuits must be separate, switched circuits having fused disconnect switches or circuit breakers so that only the appropriate navigation lights can be switched on.
( g ) A separate circuit with overcurrent protection at the main distribution panel or switchboard must be provided for each radio installation.
#### § 52.25-3 Feedwater heaters (modifies PFH-1).

Feedwater heaters must meet the requirements in PFH-1 of Section I of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 52.01-1).

[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18815, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65161, Oct. 31, 2008]
#### § 501.18 Delegation to the Director, Bureau of Enforcement, Investigations, and Compliance.

As set forth in §§ 502.63(d) and 502.604, the Director, Bureau of Enforcement, Investigations, and Compliance (BEIC) has delegated authority to issue Notice(s) of Violations (NOV) and to compromise civil penalty claims subject to review by the Commission pursuant to § 501.11(f)(2). This delegation shall include the authority to compromise claims relating to the retention, suspension, or revocation of ocean transportation intermediary licenses.

[88 FR 23363, Apr. 17, 2023]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending April 14, 2007

|Filer               | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------
|SUSQUEHANNA BANK PA | * Branch       | Susquehanna Bank PA, Lancaster, PA, to establish a branch office at 100 Sterling Parkway, Suite 100, Mechanicsburg, Cumberland County, PA. | Newspaper:04/16/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:          | 04/16/2007    
|Federal Register:   | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us