alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Crim. No. 4009.

Second Dist., Div. Two.

Sept. 4, 1946.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. RALPH W. PARRISH, Appellant.

*908Gladys Towles Root for Appellant.

Robert W. Kenny, Attorney General, and John F. Hassler, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.

WILSON, J.

Appellant was charged with having violated section 288 of the Penal Code. Tie entered a plea of guilty, applied for probation and for a hearing under the sexual psychopath provisions of the Welfare and Institutions Code (§§ 5500-5516). Pursuant to the statute the court appointed three physicians who examined appellant and made their reports in writing. It was stipulated that the reports were to be considered as evidence by the court.

Probation was denied, appellant was sentenced to the state prison for the term prescribed by law, and the court found and adjudged that he is a sexual pervert and not a sexual psychopath. The appeal is from that judgment and from the judgment of conviction.

The only ground stated by appellant for a reversal is that the evidence does not sustain the finding and judgment that he is not a sexual psychopath. Each- of the physicians made a separate report setting forth the facts ascertained by him upon his examination of appellant and stated his individual conclusions. Two of them expressed the opinion that appellant is a sexual psychopath and one was of the opinion that he is a sexual pervert.

The court was not bound by a preponderance of the professional opinion but upon examination of the facts stated in the several reports was at liberty to reach its own conclusions and to make its findings in accord with the opinion of one of the physicians. *(People*v. *Driggs,*14 Cal.App. 507, 510 [112 P. 577]; *People*v. *Hales,*23 Cal.App. 731, 735 [139 P. 667]; *People*v. *French,*12 Cal.2d 720, 763 [87 P.2d 1014]; *People*v. *Sains,*162 Cal. 242, 245 [121 P. 922]; Pen. Code, § 1127b.) The determination of the trial court reached on conflicting evidence will not be disturbed on appeal.

The judgments appealed from are affirmed.

Moore, P. J., and McComb, J., concurred.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 87 (Monday, May 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 25780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2227]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--AAF Association, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 21, 2007, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), AAF Association, Inc. has filed 
written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the 
Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Disk Stream, Inc., 
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA; Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA; and 
Virorum Consulting LLP, Brighton, East Sussex, UNITED KINGDOM have 
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and AAF Association, Inc. intends to 
file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On March 28, 2000, AAF Association Inc. filed its original 
notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 
6(b) of the Act on June 29, 2000 (65 FR 40127).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on December 21, 
2006. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on January 25, 2007 (72 FR 3414).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-2227 Filed 5-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 150 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 150

To prohibit the importation of foreign-made flags of the United States 
                              of America.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Solomon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the importation of foreign-made flags of the United States 
                              of America.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Flag Fidelity Act''.

SEC. 2. IMPORTATION OF FOREIGN-MADE AMERICAN FLAGS PROHIBITED.

    After the date of the enactment of this Act, no flag of the United 
States of America (regardless of size and whether or not in compliance 
with the standard proportions prescribed by Executive order) that is 
the product or manufacture of any foreign country or instrumentality 
may be imported into the United States.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



Exhibit 21                            Subsidiaries of the Company

Name                                    State of Incorporation     Date of Incorporation      Status
------------------------------------  ---------------------------  ---------------------  ---------------
<S>                                   <C>                          <C>                    <C>
Big City NY, Inc.. . . . . . . . . .  New York                     November 26, 1997      Wholly-owned by
                                                                                        VillageWorld.com, Inc.

Bagel Partners, Inc. . . . . . . . .  Delaware                     May 7, 1996            Wholly-owned by
                                                                                        VillageWorld.com, Inc.

Intelligent Computer Solutions, Inc.  New York                     October 21, 1994       Wholly-owned by
                                                                                        VillageWorld.com, Inc.

Village Net, Inc.. . . . . . . . . .  New York                     June 6, 1995           Wholly-owned by
                                                                                        VillageWorld.com, Inc.
</TABLE>
Oct 20, 2015

1

Additional information Docket No. FAA-2015-2819

Registered Owner Names:

Hawaiian Electric Companies to include 

Hawaiian Electric Company (HECO)

Maui Electric Company (MECO)

Hawaii Electric Light Company (HELCO)

Aircraft Description:

Quadcopter

Aircraft Builder:

DJI

Year Manufactured:

2015

Aircraft Model Designation:

Inspire 

Engine Model:

DJI3510

Maximum Weight:

6.5 lbs

Registered Owner Names:

Hawaiian Electric Companies to include 

Hawaiian Electric Company (HECO)

Maui Electric Company (MECO)

Hawaii Electric Light Company (HELCO)

Aircraft Description:

Quadcopter

Aircraft Builder:

DJI

Year Manufactured:

2015

Aircraft Model Designation:

Phantom 3 professional DJP3P

Engine Model:

DJI 2312/960KV

Maximum Weight:

2.8 lbs

HECO, MECO, and HELCO, is requesting to add two additional Unmanned Aircraft models

from DJI. See above, full explanation of Unmanned Aircraft we wish to include in our request for

exemption. DJI has already received multiple approvals for Section 333, such as Exemption No.

11278, 11225, and S11252. 

There will be no change in the condition and reasons relative to public interest and safety.

None of our operations would change; we are just requesting to add additional Unmanned

Aircraft to our exemption for greater flexibility. 

Thank you for your time, and please direct all questions and concerns to Ms. Joanne 

Williamson at Hawaiian Electric Company: joanne.williamson@hawaiianelectric.com
**EXHIBIT 99.6**I, Gerald W. Grandey, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 40-F of Cameco Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis annual report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and theaudit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 30, 2007           */s/ Gerald W. Grandey*    Gerald W. Grandey    President & Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of i2 
Technologies, Inc. of our report dated January 18, 1999, with respect to the 
financial statements of i2 Technologies, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of i2 Technologies, 
Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's 
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In 
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when 
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, 
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on 
Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-03703, 333-27009, 333-28147 and 333-53667) and on Form 
S-3 (File Nos. 333-57531) of i2 Technologies, Inc. of our report dated January 
18, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of i2 
Technologies, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year 
ended December 31, 1998.



Dallas, Texas
February 1, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ARNOLD INDUSTRIES, INC.'S FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      29,613,268
<SECURITIES>                                 8,227,492
<RECEIVABLES>                               46,169,264
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,668,749
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            98,276,392
<PP&E>                                     349,746,678
<DEPRECIATION>                             144,620,362
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             322,454,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       48,803,694
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    29,942,628
<OTHER-SE>                                 192,006,260
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               322,454,674
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            96,001,963
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               84,469,936
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               287,250
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             283,539
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,361,784
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,135,387
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,226,397
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,226,397
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 106 (Monday, June 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 30809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2756]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the 
President's Cancer Panel, May 24, 2007, 12:30 p.m. to May 24, 2007, 
2:30 p.m. National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852 which was published in the Federal Register on May 
4, 2007, 72 FR 25322.
    This meeting has been rescheduled to occur on June 14, 2007 from 9 
a.m. to 10 a.m. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: May 25, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2756 Filed 6-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**EXHIBIT ITEM 32.1**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

The certification set forth below isbeing submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for thepurpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of theUnited States Code.

 

March 29, 2010

 

Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr., theChief Executive Officer of Northern California Bancorp, Inc. certifies:

 

i.                  that this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

ii.               that information contained in the annualreport on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations  of Northern CaliforniaBancorp, Inc.

 

 
|   | /s/ Charles T.  Chrietzberg, Jr. |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Charles T.  Chrietzberg, Jr.     |
|   | Chief Executive Officer               |
|   | and President                         |

 

1

----
§ 42.15-55 Cargo ports and other similar openings. ( a ) Cargo ports and other similar openings in the sides of vessels below the freeboard deck shall be fitted with doors so designed as to ensure watertightness and structural integrity commensurate with the surrounding shell plating, to the satisfaction of the assigning authority. The arrangements shall be subject to tightness tests at the initial survey and at such subsequent surveys or more frequent intervals as deemed necessary. The number of such openings shall be the minimum compatible with the design and proper working of the vessel.
( b ) Unless permitted by the Commandant the lower edge of such openings shall not be below a line drawn parallel to the freeboard deck at side, which has at its lowest point the upper edge of the uppermost load line.
[CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10062, July 12, 1968, as amended by CGFR 68-126, 34 FR 9014, June 5, 1969]
CERTIFICATION  OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consolidated  Medical  Management,  Inc.  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  1992  AND  SECTION  1350  OF  18  U.S.C.  63.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Timothy G. Byrd, Sr., the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Accounting
Officer  of  Consolidated  Medical  Management,  Inc.  hereby certify that to my
knowledge,  Consolidated Medical Management's periodic report on Form 10-QSB for
the period ended March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained  in  the  periodic  report on Form 10-QSB and the financial statements
contained  therein  fairly  presents,  in  all  material respects, the financial
condition and results of the operations of Consolidated Medical Management, Inc.



Date:  May  20,  2004                 /s/  Timothy  G.  Byrd,  Sr.
                                      ----------------------------
                                      Timothy  G.  Byrd,  Sr.,
                                      Chief  Executive  Officer
                                      Consolidated  Medical  Management,  Inc.


<PAGE>
Editorial Note on Part 356
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 356 appear at 68 FR 5576, Feb. 4, 2003.

§ 356.43 Long-term or exclusive sales contracts. ( a ) An owner or bareboat charterer of a Fishing Industry Vessel may enter into an agreement or contract with a Non-Citizen for the sale of all or a significant portion of its catch where the contract or agreement is solely for the purpose of employment of certain vessels on an exclusive basis for a specified period of time. Such contracts or agreements will not require our prior approval; provided, that the contract or agreement does not convey control over the owner or bareboat charterer of the vessel or the vessel's operation, management and harvesting activities.
( b ) Provisions of a long-term or exclusive contract or agreement for the sale of all or a significant portion of a vessel's catch entered into pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section that are not considered to convey impermissible control to a Non-Citizen and do not require our approval include provisions that: ( 1 ) Specify that the owner or bareboat charterer agrees to sell and purchaser agrees to procure, on a preferential basis, a certain quantity of fish caught by a vessel owner or bareboat charterer on a specific vessel;
( 2 ) Specify that the vessel owner or charterer is responsible for supplying a specific type of fish to off-loading points designated by the purchaser;
( 3 ) Provide for the replacement by the vessel owner of vessels covered by the contract or agreement in the event of loss or damage;
( 4 ) Specify refrigeration criteria;
( 5 ) Provide that the owner or bareboat charterer has to comply with fishing schedules that specify the maximum age of fish to be delivered and a method to coordinate delivery to the purchaser;
( 6 ) Provide for methods of calculating price per pound or other price schedules and a schedule for payment for delivered fish;
( 7 ) Provide for an arbitration mechanism in the event of dispute; and
( 8 ) Provide for the purchaser to furnish off-loading crew and/or processing or quality control technicians but no other vessel crew members.
( c ) An owner or bareboat charterer of a Fishing Industry Vessel must obtain the approval of the Citizenship Approval Officer prior to entering into any agreement or contract with a Non-Citizen for the sale of all or a significant portion of a vessel's catch if the agreement or contract contains provisions that in any way convey to the purchaser of the vessel's catch control over the operation, management or harvesting activities of the vessel, vessel owner, or bareboat charterer other than as provided for in paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) An owner or bareboat charterer must submit, with its Affidavit of United States Citizenship and annually thereafter, a list of any long-term or exclusive sales agreements to which it is a party and the principal parties to those agreements. If requested, a copy of such agreements must be provided to the Citizenship Approval Officer.
§ 35.35-70 Maintenance of cargo handling equipment—TB/ALL. The cargo handling equipment shall be maintained by the tank vessel's personnel in accordance with the regulations in this subchapter, including the following: ( a ) Cargo hose shall not be used in transfer operations in which the pressures are such that leakage of cargo occurs through the body of the hose.
( b ) Cargo pump relief valves shall be tested at least once each year to determine that they function satisfactorily at the pressure at which they are set to open.
( c ) Cargo pump pressure gage shall be tested at least once a year for accuracy.
( d ) The cargo discharge piping of all tank vessels shall be tested at least once each year for tightness, at the maximum working pressure.
#### § 182.600 General.

A self-propelled vessel must comply with the provisions of this subpart.