alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending May 3, 2008

----

Bank Branches, DomesticRolling Hills Bank & Trust, Atlantic, Iowa  -- to establish a branch at 502 Broad Street, Adair.					-Approved, May 1, 2008 					

Discount RatesDiscount and Advance Rates  -- decrease in the primary credit rate from 2-1/2 percent to 2-1/4 percent by the Federal Reserve Banks of New York, Cleveland, Atlanta, and San Francisco.					-Approved, April 30, 2008 					Discount and Advance Rates  -- decrease in the primary credit rate from 2-1/2 percent to 2-1/4 percent by the Federal Reserve Banks of Chicago, St. Louis, and Kansas City.					-Approved, April 30, 2008 					Discount and Advance Rates  -- decrease in the primary credit rate from 2-1/2 percent to 2-1/4 percent by the Federal Reserve Banks of Boston, Philadelphia, Richmond, Minneapolis, and Dallas.					-Approved, May 1, 2008 					

EnforcementFirst Bank of Snook, Snook, Texas  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas and the State of Texas Department of Banking.					-Announced, May 1, 2008 					WSB Financial Group, Inc., Bremerton, Washington  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.					-Announced, April 29, 2008 					

Regulations And PoliciesCredit Card Accounts and Overdraft Services  -- publication for comment of amendments to Regulations AA, DD, and Z to prohibit unfair or deceptive acts or practices in connection with these accounts and services (Docket Nos. R-1314, R-1315, and R-1286).					-Approved, May 2, 2008 					Privacy Act  -- publication for comment of amendments to the Board's Privacy Act regulation to conform it with current recordkeeping and disclosure practices (Docket No. R-1313).					-Approved, April 24, 2008 					(AC)Privacy Act Systems of Records  -- notice of amendments to create two systems of records, to delete two unused systems, and to update routine uses of information in systems of records (Docket No. OP-1312).					-Approved, April 24, 2008 					(AC)

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: May 8, 2008
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.968 Cargo transfer conference. ( a ) Before he may begin making connections for cargo transfer, the person in charge of cargo transfer shall confer with the person supervising the cargo transfer at the facility.
( b ) The person in charge of cargo transfer shall discuss the important aspects of the transfer operation, such as the following, with the supervisor at the facility: ( 1 ) The products to be transferred.
( 2 ) The cargo loading rates marked on the cargo piping plan or the maximum safe transfer rates.
( 3 ) The critical or hazardous stages of the transfer operation.
( 4 ) The emergency procedures in case of a spill.
( 5 ) If the vessel is equipped with the tank overflow alarm prescribed in § 153.408(c), a procedure for shutdown of shore pumps, shore valves, and ship's valves that prevents piping system pressures from exceeding those for which the piping system is designed.
[CGD 73-96, 42 FR 49027, Sept. 26, 1977, as amended by CGD 78-128, 47 FR 21211, May 17, 1982; CGD 81-078, 50 FR 21174, May 22, 1985]
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Erin Broussard v. Roy Arnel

Appellate case number: 01-18-00687-CV

Trial court case number: 16-DCV-233665

Trial court: 328th District Court of Fort Bend County

Appellant, Erin Broussard, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s order in 

a suit to modify the parent-child relationship. Appellee, Roy Arnel, has filed a “Motion to 

Dismiss Appeal Due to Interference with Child Custody,” contending that this Court should 

dismiss the appeal and affirm the trial court’s judgment because of appellant’s failure to 

comply with a court order under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c). Appellee 

asserts that appellant has failed to comply with three trial court orders, an Order on 

Emergency Temporary Order, an Order on Motion for Temporary Orders Pending Appeal, 

and the challenged order on appeal, the order in suit to modify parent-child relationship. 

This Court requested a response by appellant to the motion to dismiss and granted 

appellant’s requests to extend her time to file her brief until December 31, 2018, and to file 

her response until December 14, 2018.

On December 10, 2018, appellant filed a response to the motion to dismiss. 

Appellant contends that Rule 42.3(c) does not apply to failure to comply with trial court 

orders, only with appellate court orders. See O’Connor v. Sam Houston Med. Hosp., Inc., 

807 S.W.2d 574, 576 (Tex. 1991); Dzierwa v. Cerda, No. 04-13-00407-CV, 2014 WL 

3843950, at *2 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Aug. 6, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op.); TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.3(c).

Rule 60(a), the predecessor to Rule 42.3(c), “does not authorize dismissal of an 

appeal for failure of the appellant to comply with an order of the trial court.” O’Connor, 

807 S.W.2d at 576; see also Dzierwa, 2014 WL 3843950, at *2. Accordingly, appellee’s

motion is denied. Broussard’s appellant’s brief remains due by December 31, 2018.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Evelyn V. Keyes________

x Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: __December 20, 2018____
**EXHIBIT 99.11****CONSENT OF EXPERT**     Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Cameco Corporation (the“Company”) to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.     Ihereby consent to the use of and reference to my name under theheading “Centerra Gold Inc. — Reserves andResources” in the Company’s Annual Information Form for theyear ended December 31, 2006, dated March 28, 2007 (the“AIF”), under the heading “Gold — QualifiedPerson” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis ofFinancial Condition and Results of Operation for the year endedDecember 31, 2006 (the “MD&A”) and in the 40-F,and to disclosure of a scientific and technical nature pursuant towhich I have acted in a supervisory capacity under the heading“Centerra Gold Inc. — Reserves and Resources” ofthe AIF and under the heading “Gold — QualifiedPerson” in the MD&A.Sincerely,     */s/ Ian Atkinson*  Name:  Ian Atkinson  Title:  Vice President, Exploration, Centerra Gold Inc.  Date: March 31, 2008
P. 1


# OAR Box 1878 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



## Document

Number: 

# 74 ) 11-1- 4 Docket Number: 

# A-90-1 9

Printed 11/28/2008 1:21:24

PM Sheet 74 of 145

### NO x EMISSION S FRO M PETROLEUM INDUSTRY OPERATION S P. 2 

# A-90-1 9 II-I- 4

L EP A AI R DOCKE T AP I PUBLICATION4 31 1

Prepare d for : TH E AMERICA

NPETROLEU

M INSTITUT E

By : S . C . HUNTE R S . S . CHERRY

KVB AResearch-Cottrel l Company

OCTOBE R 197 9P. 3

TABL E 4-13 . ENERG

YCONSUMED B

YDEVIC E TYP E FO RSURVEYE

D REFINERIE S Devic e C O Boiler s Proces s Heater s Natura l Draf t Mechanica l Draf t Engine s IC E Ga s Turbine Combine d Cycle s Stea m Boiler s Composit e fo

r AQCR' s 30 , 43 , 67 , 106 , an d 216 . % o f Tota l 

### 5 . 61 . V 

### 4 .
6 22 . 3 7 53. 5 8. 2 4 0. 7 3. 7 

### 3 2

V

TABL E 4-14 . ENERG

YCONSUMED BYFUE L TYP E FO RSURVEYE

D REFINERIE S Fue l C O Ga s Natura l Ga s Refiner y Ga s Distillat e Oi l Residua l Oi l
Composit e fo

r AQCR' s 30 , 43 , 67 , 106 , an d 216 . % o f 

### 2 . 2 E 6 2 0 5 . 10 0 Tota l 

### 5 7

. 9

. 7 2

. 0

8 3
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Stephen L. Day
    
    /s/ Michael W. BrunsStephen L. Day
    
    Michael W. BrunsPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director
    
    Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
    
    (Principal Financial Officer)Date: November 14, 2008
    
    Date: November 14, 2008
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Norman James Thode,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 15-10988

Commissioner of Social Security, Honorable Sean F. Cox

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING 

11/24/15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

Plaintiff filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging a final decision of the

Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for Disability Insurance Benefits under

the Social Security Act. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge David Grand for

determination of all non-dispositive motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Report and

Recommendation pursuant to § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). Thereafter, the parties filed motions for

summary judgment.

On November 24, 2015, Magistrate Judge Grand issued a Report and Recommendation

(“R&R”) (Docket Entry No. 11) wherein he recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion

for Summary Judgment, grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and affirm the

Commissioner’s decision.

Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), a party objecting to the recommended disposition of a

matter by a Magistrate Judge must filed objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after

being served with a copy of the R&R. “The district judge to whom the case is assigned shall

1

2:15-cv-10988-SFC-DRG Doc # 12 Filed 12/14/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 760
make a de novo determination upon the record, or after additional evidence, of any portion of the

magistrate judge’s disposition to which specific written objection has been made.” Id. 

The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired and the docket reflects that neither

party has filed objections to the R&R. The Court hereby ADOPTS the November 24, 2015

R&R. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED,

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and the Commissioner’s decision is

AFFIRMED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S/Sean F. Cox 

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge

Dated: December 14, 2015

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on

December 14, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Jennifer McCoy 

Case Manager

2

2:15-cv-10988-SFC-DRG Doc # 12 Filed 12/14/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 761
#### § 502.243 Participation of absent Commissioner.

Any Commissioner who is not present at oral argument and who is otherwise authorized to participate in a decision shall participate in making that decision after reading the transcript of oral argument unless he or she files in writing an election not to participate. [Rule 243.]
#### Mary Raynor, *Appellant, v.*Lucy Maria Raynor and others, *Respondents*.

Judgment affirmed in all respects, without costs to either party.
§ 42.15-45 Ventilators. ( a ) Ventilators in position 1 or 2 to spaces below the freeboard decks or decks of enclosed superstructures shall have coamings of steel or other equivalent material, substantially constructed and efficiently connected to the deck. Where the coaming of any ventilator exceeds 351 ⁄ 2 inches in height it shall be specially supported.
( b ) Ventilators passing through superstructures other than enclosed superstructures shall have substantially constructed coamings of steel or other equivalent material at the freeboard deck.
( c ) Ventilators in position 1 the coamings of which extend to more than 14.8 feet above the deck, and in position 2 the coamings of which extend to more than 7.5 feet above the deck, need not be fitted with closing arrangements unless specifically required by the assigning authority.
( d ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section ventilator openings shall be provided with efficient weathertight closing appliances. In vessels of not more than 328 feet in length the closing appliances shall be permanently attached; where not so provided in other vessels, they shall be conveniently stowed near the ventilators to which they are to be fitted. Ventilators in position 1 shall have coamings of a height of at least 351 ⁄ 2 inches above the deck; in position 2 the coamings shall be of a height at least 30 inches above the deck.
( e ) In exposed positions, the height of coamings may be required to be increased to the satisfaction of the assigning authority.
[CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10061, July 12, 1968, as amended by CGFR 68-126, 34 FR 9014, June 5, 1969]
EXHIBIT 10.31


                               Aura Systems, Inc.
                                   Term Sheet


Instrument                          Registered common shares of the Company

Purchase Price                      $0.30 per share

Amount                              $4 million

Shares to be Issued                 13,333,333 common shares

Use of Proceeds                     Re-purchase of secured note payment
                                    converted into registered common shares

Closing                             By February 22, 2002

Documentation                       Company will provide registered common
                                    shares by March 1, 2002

Conditions                          Company  will raise a minimum of $15
                                    million in preferred shares offering
                                    by March 7, 2002.  If not,  purchase
                                    price of shares reduced to $0.25 per
                                    share

                                    Anti-dilution   protection  for  one
                                    year  period in that any  adjustment
                                    will be to lowest  stock  sale price
                                    from closing of this transaction

                                    To be paid in registered shares under same
                                    terms above in agreements



On behalf of Aura Systems, Inc.

         /s/_________________________ on this date_________________
         Zvi (Harry) Kurtzman

On behalf of Investor Group:                         Amount: _______________

         /s/_________________________ on this date_________________
         Bruce Cowen
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1411

To prohibit any executive branch agency from entering into any service

contract if the services procured under the contract can be performed

at a lower cost by employees of the agency.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 5, 1995

Ms. NORTON (for herself and Mrs. MORELLA) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To prohibit any executive branch agency from entering into

any service contract if the services procured under the

contract can be performed at a lower cost by employees

of the agency.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON ENTERING CERTAIN SERVICE

4 CONTRACTS.

5 (a) PROHIBITION.—An agency in the executive

6 branch of the Federal Government may not enter into a

7 service contract, unless—

8 (1) the agency has determined—
2

HR 1411 IH

1 (A) the total cost to the Federal Govern2 ment of procuring services under the contract;

3 and

4 (B) the total cost to the Federal Govern5 ment of having those services performed by em6 ployees of the agency; and

7 (2) the costs determined under paragraph

8 (1)(A) are less than the costs determined under

9 paragraph (1)(B).

10 (b) COST COMPARISON.—The comparison of costs re11 quired by subsection (a)(2) shall be made pursuant to the

12 criteria set forth in Office of Management and Budget

13 Circular A–76, as in effect on the date of the enactment

14 of this Act.

15 (c) APPLICATION.—Subsection (a) shall apply with

16 respect to contracts awarded after the date of enactment

17 of this Act.

18 (d) SERVICE CONTRACT DEFINED.—For the pur19 poses of this section, the term ‘‘service contract’’ has the

20 meaning given such term in part 37 of title 48 of the Code

21 of Federal Regulations.

Æ
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1
 
                  Report and Consent of Independent Auditors
 
The Board of Directors
Siebel Systems, Inc.
 
  The audits referred to in our report dated January 26, 1999 included the
related financial statement schedule as of December 31, 1998, and for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, as listed in the
Index in Item 14(a)2 herein. The financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on the financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our
opinion, the financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the
basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in
all material respects, the information set forth therein.
 
  We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-53369, 333-36957, 333-68041, 333-40259, 333-07983, 333-22763, 333-
40437, and 333-72969) on Forms S-3 and S-8 of Siebel Systems, Inc. of our
reports dated January 26, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Siebel Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and
the related statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss),
stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1998, and related financial statement schedule,
which reports appear in the December 31,1998, annual report on Form 10-K of
Siebel Systems, Inc.
 
KPMG LLP
 
Mountain View, California
March 26, 1999
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending July 7, 2007

|Filer              | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                               | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------ | ----------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|WCB HOLDINGS, INC. | * 3A1       | WCB Holdings, Inc., to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Western Commercial Bank, both of Woodland Hills, California. | Newspaper:07/18/2007Federal Register:07/16/2007
|Newspaper:         | 07/18/2007 
|Federal Register:  | 07/16/2007 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 4.09-15 Time and place of investigation, notice of; rights of witnesses, etc.

Reasonable notice of the time and place of the investigation shall be given to any person whose conduct is or may be under investigation and to any other party in interest. All parties in interest shall be allowed to be represented by counsel, to cross-examine witnesses, and to call witnesses in their own behalf.
§ 56.50-97 Piping for instruments, control, and sampling (modifies 122.3). ( a ) Piping for instruments, control, and sampling must comply with paragraph 122.3 of ASME B31.1 (incorporated by reference; see § 56.01-2) except that: ( 1 ) Soldered type fittings may not be used.
( 2 ) The outside diameter of takeoff connections may not be less than 0.840 inches for service conditions up to 900 psig or 800 °F, and 1.050 inches for conditions that exceed either of these limits.
( b ) [Reserved]
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18843, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGFR 69-127, 35 FR 9978, June 17, 1970; CGD 73-254, 40 FR 40165, Sept. 2, 1975; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65178, Oct. 31, 2008]