alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014202EN.01000601.xml

| 30.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court — Ireland) — H. N. v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Ireland, Attorney General

(Case C-604/12) (1)

1

((Directive 2004/83/EC - Minimum standards for granting refugee status or subsidiary protection status - Directive 2005/85/EC - Minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting or withdrawing refugee status - National procedural rule under which an application for subsidiary protection may be considered only after an application for refugee status has been refused - Lawfulness - Procedural autonomy of the Member States - Principle of effectiveness - Right to good administration - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 41 - Impartiality and expeditiousness of the procedure))

2014/C 202/07

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

Supreme Court

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: H. N.

Applicant:

Defendants: Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Ireland, Attorney General

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Supreme Court — Interpretation of Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted (OJ 2004 L 304, p. 12) — Application for subsidiary protection status made by a person who had not previously made an application for refugee status

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refuges or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted, the principle of effectiveness and the right to good administration do not preclude a national procedural rule, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which an application for subsidiary protection may be considered only after an application for refugee status has been refused, provided that, first, it is possible to submit the application for refugee status and the application for subsidiary protection at the same time and, second, the national procedural rule does not give rise to a situation in which the application for subsidiary protection is considered only after an unreasonable length of time, which is a matter to be determined by the referring court.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.

1

---
EXHIBIT 23

                           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR



<PAGE>
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The  Board  of  Directors
Lexington  B  &  L  Financial  Corp.
Lexington,  Missouri  64067


We  hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the Registration
Statement  of  Lexington B & L Financial Corp. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-29807),
of  our  report dated November 18, 2002, accompanying the consolidated financial
statements incorporated by reference in Lexington B & L Financial Corp.'s Annual
Report  on  Form  10-KSB  for  the  year  ended  September  30,  2002.



/s/ Moore, Horton & Carlson, P.C.
Mexico,  Missouri
December  23,  2002


<PAGE>
#### Henry Y. Attrill, *Respondent, v.*The Rockaway Beach Improvement Company (Limited), *Appellant.*

Order affirmed, without costs. Opinion

*Per Curiam,.*
# C_2013367EN.01001102.xml

| 14.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Yvon Welte v Finanzamt Velbert

(Case C-181/12) (1)

1

(Free movement of capital - Articles 56 EC to 58 EC - Inheritance tax - Deceased person and heir resident in a third country - Estate - Immovable property located in a Member State - Right to an allowance against the taxable value - Different treatment of residents and non-residents)

2013/C 367/18

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Yvon Welte

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt Velbert

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Interpretation of Articles 63 and 65 TFEU — Legislation of a Member State on inheritance tax fixing the tax-free part of the value of land at EUR 2 000 if the deceased person and the acquirer are resident in a third country, whereas the tax-free part is EUR 500 000 if either the deceased person or the acquirer is resident in the national territory

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 56 EC and 58 EC must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State relating to the calculation of inheritance tax which provides that, in the event of inheritance of immovable property in that State, in a case where, as in the main proceedings, the deceased and the heir had a permanent residence in a third country, such as the Swiss Confederation, at the time of the death, the tax-free allowance is less than the allowance which would have been applied if at least one of them had been resident in that Member State at that time.

---

(1)  OJ 2012 C 174, p. 20

1

---
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-20094 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

VERDELL KENNEDY, 

 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO MODIFY 

SENTENCE (ECF No. 278) WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

 Defendant Verdell Kennedy is a federal inmate incarcerated at the Ashland 

Federal Correctional Institution. On May 4, 2020, Kennedy filed a motion to modify 

his sentence and for an order of release due to the COVID-19 pandemic. (See Mot., 

ECF No. 278.) The Court held a hearing on the motion on May 26, 2020, and an 

on-the-record status conference on June 10, 2020. For the reasons stated on the 

record, the motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Kennedy may renew 

his motion if there is a material change in the conditions at the Ashland facility. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

Dated: June 10, 2020 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:15-cr-20094-MFL-EAS ECF No. 289 filed 06/10/20 PageID.1292 Page 1 of 2
2 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on June 10, 2020, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/ Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (810) 341-9764 

Case 2:15-cr-20094-MFL-EAS ECF No. 289 filed 06/10/20 PageID.1293 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1459 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1459

    To increase the supply of minority scientists and help meet the 
research and development needs of the public and private sectors of the 
                             United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 1995

Mr. Thompson (for himself, Mr. Hilliard, Mr. Jefferson, Mr. Montgomery, 
Ms. Jackson-Lee, Mr. Fields of Louisiana, and Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson 
  of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                          Committee on Science

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To increase the supply of minority scientists and help meet the 
research and development needs of the public and private sectors of the 
                             United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds that--
            (1) there is a need for more minority scientists in the 
        United States to meet the research needs of the public and 
        private sectors of the Nation;
            (2) to increase the number of minority scientists, four 
        historically Black universities, Alabama A&M University in 
        Huntsville, Alabama, Jackson State University in Jackson, 
        Mississippi, Prairie View A&M University in Prairie View, 
        Texas, and Southern University and A&M College in Baton Rouge, 
        Louisiana, along with the Lawrence Livermore National 
        Laboratory in Livermore, California, established a Science and 
        Engineering Alliance (in this Act referred to as the 
        ``Alliance'') in 1990;
            (3) since its establishment, the Alliance has demonstrated 
        its impact on increasing the number of minority scientists and 
        providing opportunities for such scientists to improve their 
        skills;
            (4) the Alliance has developed a Teacher 2000 initiative to 
        increase the number of minority science teachers in the United 
        States;
            (5) such initiative will establish Centers of Excellence in 
        Teacher Preparation at the four universities described in 
        paragraph (2); and
            (6) such initiative would be a pilot project that can serve 
        as a national model for increasing the number of minority 
        scientists.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated to the National Science 
Foundation $6,500,000, to be made available to the Alliance for the 
Centers of Excellence in Teacher Preparation.
                                 <all>
```
§ 272.12 Determining the condition of eligible vessels. The Operator of an Eligible Vessel shall make the vessel available whenever MARAD may require, in any of the following instances: ( a ) At the commencement of the first subsidized voyage, except for a newly constructed vessel which enters subsidized service immediately upon delivery by the shipyard, and for which there is a prior condition survey report. If that subsidized service commences outside the continental limits of the United States, the vessel may be surveyed at the first United States port of call;
( b ) At the commencement of the first voyage following the effective date for M&R subsidy established by MARAD, if such M&R rate was not established at the commencement of the vessel's first voyage;
( c ) Upon the discontinuance of a M&R subsidy rate;
( d ) Upon resumption of subsidized voyages after temporary withdrawal from subsidized operation. The vessel shall not be considered as having been temporarily withdrawn from subsidized service if it performed unsubsidized voyages in a subsidized service of the Operator;
( e ) Upon withdrawal from subsidized service, either temporarily (subject to the provisions of paragraph (d) of § 272.14), or permanently;
( f ) During the dry docking period incident to the vessel's American Bureau of Shipping Special Surveys;
( g ) Upon termination of the last voyage under the ODSA, or at the end of the contract period, with respect to subsidized vessels in idle status at that time; or
( h ) At any other time that MARAD considers to be appropriate.
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 10.21


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
MODACAD, INC.
1995 STOCK OPTION PLAN

            ModaCAD, Inc.'s 1995 Plan shall be amended as follows:

            The text of Section 2(i), "Disinterested Person", of the ModaCAD,
Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") shall be deleted. The current
subsection (j) (entitled "Employee") shall be designated subsection (i); the
current sub-section (k) (entitled "Exchange Act") shall be designated (j); and
the current sub-section (l) (entitled "Incentive Stock Option") shall be
designated (k);

            A new sub-section shall be inserted as subsection (m) to read in its
entirety as follows:

            "Non-Employee Director" shall have that meaning, and shall be
            interpreted in a manner consistent with, the meaning of such term
            under Rule 16b-3 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
            Commission under the Exchange Act, as amended from time to time.
            "Director" shall mean a duly elected and qualified member of the
            Board.

            The second paragraph of Section 4(a) of the Plan is hereby amended
to read in its entirety as follows:

            The Board may at any time appoint a Committee consisting of not less
            than two persons to administer the Plan on behalf of the Board,
            subject to such terms and conditions as the Board may prescribe.
            Members of the Committee shall serve for such period of time as the
            Board may determine. From time to time the Board may increase the
            size of the Committee and appoint additional members thereto, remove
            members (with or without cause) and appoint new members in
            substitution therefor, fill vacancies however caused, or remove all
            members of the Committee and thereafter directly administer the
            Plan. In the event the Company has a class of equity securities
            registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act and unless the Board
            determines otherwise, from the effective date of such registration,
            all grants of Options to persons subject to the provisions of
            Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act shall be made by the Board or in
            accordance with the recommendations of a Committee of two or more
            persons having full authority to act in the matter and all of whom
            are Non-Employee Directors.

Dated: October __, 1996
p.1 

OAR Box 1793 

Prepped by Keeia Richards 

Document Number: 

36) ll-F-81 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 11/3/200811:31:54 AM Sheet 36 of 45 
P.2 

A-9D-37 

IT- F-zrx 

* \ 

COVE R 

SHEE T 

^

£DS7 ^ tt. 

4 

UJ 

*L PR0^° 

FAX 

To: Chris Wolz 

Fax#: 1-202/395-7205 

Subject: Revised Preamble Language for 

Class I Costs and Burdens 

Date: 1 1/13/95 

Pages: 2 (including cover sheet) 

COMMENTS: 

Here is the one page that we discussed by phone. If I can be of further assistance, 

please call me again. 

JL.M i1 

APR 3 01996 IH; 

EPAAIH DOCKET* 

From tne desk of... 

Dan deRoeCK 

Env. Engr 

U.S.EPA-ITPID/IIG 

mail drop 12 

RTP NC 27711 

919/541-5593 

FAX 919/541-5509 
P.3 

PREAMBLE —VI. Administrative Requirements 

/ 

D. Executive Order (EO) 12866 

changes that were made at the suggestion or recommendation of OMB). 

The EPA has prepared a Regulatory Impact Analysis for these rules and it is part of the 

docket for this rulemaking. As a result of the rule changes being proposed today, the EPA 

projects the overall costs and burdens for major NSR to decrease. However, the proposed 

revisions include certain provisions which, while generally intended to clarify the statutory 

Class I area protection process under the existing PSD program and improve coordination 

between the permitting authority and the Federal Land Managers (an area of the PSD rules that 

has been the subject of significant confusion and controversy), may, in certain circumstances, 

place additional burdens on the permit applicant and the permitting authority. The EPA requests 

public comment on whether these proposed revisions represent a net increase in costs and 

burdens for permitting authorities and permit applicants in comparison with the existing rules 

related to the protection of Class I areas. These issues are described in more detail in the 

Information Collection Request and will be further assessed in the Regulatory Impact Analysis 

for the final rule. 

E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending March 31, 2007

----

Bank Holding CompaniesBank of America Corporation, Charlotte, North Carolina  -- to acquire U.S. Trust Corporation, New York, New York, and United States Trust Company, National Association.					-Approved, March 26, 2007 					

Regulations And PoliciesReports to Congress  -- interagency reports on federal banking agencies' efforts to coordinate examinations as required by section 305 of the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act, and on capital and accounting differences among the agencies as required by section 37(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.					-Approved, March 26, 2007 					

Testimony And StatementsEconomic Outlook  -- statement by Chairman Bernanke before the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress.					-Published, March 28, 2007 					Subprime Mortgages  -- statement of Sandra F. Braunstein, Director, Division of Consumer and Community Affairs, before the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit, House Committee on Financial Services.					-Published, March 27, 2007 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: April 5, 2007
October 4, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

WILLIAM SATTERWHITE, JR., Appellant

NO. 14-16-00060-CV V.

STEVEN AKINS AND HOUSTON PRESS, L.P. AND CRAIG MALISOW, 

Appellees

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on December 18, 2015. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, William Satterwhite, Jr.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
CONSENT OF PANNELL KERR FORSTER,
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                           A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION




We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement of Form S-3 of our report  dated June 12,  2000,  on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Aura Systems, Inc. as of February 29, 2000,
and for  each of the two  years  then  ended.  We  also  hereby  consent  to the
reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the Registration  Statement
and Prospectus.





Pannell Kerr Forster
Certified Public Accountants
A Professional Corporation


Los Angeles, California
August 3, 2001
Editorial Note on Part 199
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 199 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59789, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 199.212 Lifejackets. ( a ) In addition to the lifejackets required under § 199.70(b), each passenger vessel must carry lifejackets for at least 5 percent of the total number of persons on board. These lifejackets must be stowed in conspicuous places on deck or at muster stations.
( b ) Where lifejackets for persons other than the crew are stowed in staterooms located remotely from direct routes between public spaces and muster stations, any additional lifejackets required by § 199.70(b)(2)(v) for these persons must be stowed in the public spaces, near muster stations, or on direct routes between them. These lifejackets must be stowed so that their distribution and donning does not impede orderly movement to muster stations and survival craft embarkation stations.
§ 32.40-50 Heating and cooling—T/ALL. ( a ) All manned spaces must be adequately heated and cooled in a manner suitable to the purpose of the space.
( b ) The heating and cooling system for accommodations must be capable of maintaining a temperature of 21 °C (70 °F) under normal operating conditions without curtailing ventilation.
( c ) Radiators and other heating apparatus must be so placed and shielded, where necessary, to avoid risk of fire, danger or discomfort to the occupants. Pipes leading to radiators or heating apparatus must be insulated where those pipes create a hazard to persons occupying the space.
#### § 27.207 What are the requirements for fuel shut-offs on towing vessels?

To stop the flow of fuel in the event of a break in the fuel line, you must have a positive, remote fuel-shut-off valve fitted on any fuel line that supplies fuel directly to an engine or generator. The valve must be near the source of supply (for instance, at the day tank, storage tank, or fuel-distribution manifold). Furthermore, it must be operable from a safe place outside the space where the valve is installed. Each remote valve control should be marked in clearly legible letters, at least 25 millimeters (1 inch) high, indicating the purpose of the valve and the way to operate it.
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

Certification

Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2007 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert M. Little, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

/s/ Robert M. Little, Jr.

Robert M. Little, Jr.

Chief Financial Officer

April 1, 2008
**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |                                                                  |
|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | /s/              Howard M.              Siegel                        |
|        |   |   | Howard                M. SiegelChief                Executive Officer |

**A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been      provided to American Medical Alert Corp. and will be retained by American      Medical Alert Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission      or      its staff upon request.**

----