# C_2012080EN.01001203.xml

| 17.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/12

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Latvia) lodged on 17 January 2012 — Mohamad Zakaria

(Case C-23/12)

2012/C 80/18

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Referring court

Augstākās tiesas Senāts/Latvia

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Mohamad Zakaria

Applicant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does Article 13(3) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) provide persons with a right of appeal not only against a decision refusing entry into a country, but also against infringements committed in the procedure leading to the adoption of a decision authorising entry? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does Article 13(3) of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) provide persons with a right of appeal not only against a decision refusing entry into a country, but also against infringements committed in the procedure leading to the adoption of a decision authorising entry?

1

| 2. | If question 1 is answered in the affirmative, in the light of recital 20 in the preamble to, and Article 6(1) of, Regulation No 562/2006, and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, does Article 13(3) of Regulation No 562/2006 require the Member States to guarantee an effective remedy before a court of law? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If question 1 is answered in the affirmative, in the light of recital 20 in the preamble to, and Article 6(1) of, Regulation No 562/2006, and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, does Article 13(3) of Regulation No 562/2006 require the Member States to guarantee an effective remedy before a court of law?

| 3. | If question 1 is answered in the affirmative and question 2 in the negative, in the light of recital 20 in the preamble to, and Article 6(1) of, Regulation No 562/2006, and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, does Article 13(3) of Regulation No 562/2006 require the Member States to guarantee an effective remedy before an administrative body which, from an institutional and functional perspective, provides the same guarantees as a court of law? |
| --- | --- |

3.

If question 1 is answered in the affirmative and question 2 in the negative, in the light of recital 20 in the preamble to, and Article 6(1) of, Regulation No 562/2006, and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, does Article 13(3) of Regulation No 562/2006 require the Member States to guarantee an effective remedy before an administrative body which, from an institutional and functional perspective, provides the same guarantees as a court of law?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 105, p. 1.

1

---