alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TIMOTHY D. WILBURN, SR.,

 Petitioner,

Civil Action 2:15-CV-11453

v. HONORABLE GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

J.A. TERRIS,

 

Respondent,

_______________________________/

ORDER DENYING THE MOTION 

TO ALTER OR TO AMEND JUDGMENT [#7]

This Court summarily denied the petition for writ of habeas corpus that had been filed by

petitioner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on April 30, 2015. The Court determined that petitioner was

not entitled to seek habeas relief from his sentence enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal

Act because his sole federal post-conviction remedy for seeking relief was by filing a motion to

vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and petitioner failed to show that his remedy under this

statute was inadequate or ineffective. Wilburn v. Terris, No. 15-CV-11453, 2015 WL 1966533 (E.D.

Mich. Apr. 30, 2015). 

Petitioner has filed a motion to alter or amend judgment. For the reasons that follow, the

motion to alter or to amend judgment is DENIED. 

A motion to alter or amend judgment brought by a habeas petitioner pursuant to Rule 59(e)

may properly be analyzed as a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Local Rule 7.1 of the Eastern

District of Michigan. Hence v. Smith, 49 F. Supp.2d 547, 550 (E.D. Mich. 1999). Local Rule 7.1

(h) allows a party to file a motion for reconsideration. E.D. Mich. L.R. 7.1(h). However, a motion

1

2:15-cv-11453-GAD-MJH Doc # 8 Filed 06/04/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 44
for reconsideration which presents the same issues already ruled upon by the court, either expressly

or by reasonable implication, will not be granted. Hence, 49 F. Supp.2d at 551-53; see also

Flanagan v. Shamo, 111 F. Supp. 2d 892, 894 (E.D. Mich. 2000). The movant shall not only

demonstrate a palpable defect by which the Court and the parties have been misled but also show

that a different disposition of the case must result from a correction thereof. A palpable defect is

a defect that is obvious, clear, unmistakable, manifest, or plain. Witzke v. Hiller, 972 F. Supp. 426,

427 (E.D. Mich. 1997). 

Petitioner is merely attempting to re-hash arguments that he previously raised in his original

habeas petition in support of his assertion that he was entitled to seek habeas relief from his sentence

enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act. The Court will therefore deny petitioner’s

motion for reconsideration because petitioner is merely presenting issues which were already

expressly ruled upon by this Court when the Court summarily denied his habeas application. See

Hence, 49 F. Supp. 2d at 551-53.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to alter or amend a judgment [Dkt. # 7] is

DENIED.

/s/Gershwin A Drain 

HONORABLE GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: June 4, 2015

2

2:15-cv-11453-GAD-MJH Doc # 8 Filed 06/04/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 45
EXHIBIT 99.11

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cameco Corporation (the Company) on Form 40-F for
the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tim Gitzel, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |     |  |                |  |                                      
| |  | --- |  | -------------- |  | -------------------------------------
| |  | By: |  | /s/ Tim Gitzel
| |  |     |  | Name:          |  | Tim Gitzel                           
| |  |     |  | Title:         |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

March 23, 2017
# Certmficate of Training Presented to 

# Kevin Coughlin For the successful completion of the DARTDRONES Basic Training and Advanced Missions Courses.

~ 

## ,

~ 

### 14 November 2015 6hris Costello Date Chief Flight Officer FAA Exempt Company 333 Exemption #11625 

# DA RT D R 0 N E S ++'
#### § 308.525 Application for decrease in amount of cash collateral fund, Form MA-305.

Application for decrease in the amount of the cash collateral deposit fund shall be made on Form MA-305, which may be obtained from MARAD's underwriting agent or MARAD.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

SUSAN TOCARCHICK, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-11329 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

UAW REGION 1 et al., 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF #11), 

GRANTING DEFENDANT UAW REGION 1’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

(ECF #4), AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT (ECF #1) 

On January 22, 2015, Plaintiff Susan Tocarchick (“Tocarchick”) filed a pro 

se Complaint in the Macomb County Circuit Court against Defendant UAW 

Region 1 and four other Defendants (the “Complaint”). (See ECF #1 at 8-23, Pg. 

ID 8-23.) It appears that UAW Region 1 is the only Defendant Tocarchick served 

with the Complaint. (See id. at 2, Pg. ID 2.) UAW Region 1 removed 

Tocarchick’s action to this Court (see ECF #1), and it moved to dismiss the claims 

Tocarchick brought against it (the “Motion to Dismiss”). (See ECF #4.) 

On July 30, 2015, Magistrate Judge David Grand issued a Report and 

Recommendation in which he recommended that the Court (1) grant the Motion to 

Dismiss and (2) dismiss Tocarchick’s claims against all of the Defendants. (See 

ECF #11.) The R&R stated that the parties could seek review of the 

2:15-cv-11329-MFL-DRG Doc # 12 Filed 08/21/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 181
2 

recommendation if they filed “specific written objections” within fourteen days. 

(See id. at 9-10, Pg. ID 179-180.) 

Neither party has objected to the R&R. Failure to file objections to the 

R&R waives any further right to appeal. See Howard v. Sec'y of Health and Human 

Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); see also Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers 

Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to 

the R&R releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. See 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The Court has nevertheless reviewed 

the R&R and agrees with the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. 

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's July 30, 

2015, Report and Recommendation (ECF #11) is ADOPTED as the Opinion of 

this Court; that the Motion to Dismiss (ECF #4) is GRANTED; and that 

Tocarchick’s Complaint (ECF #1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

       s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: August 21, 2015 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on August 21, 2015, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113 

2:15-cv-11329-MFL-DRG Doc # 12 Filed 08/21/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 182
# Presidential Determination on Transfer of Funds from FY 2006 Economic Support Fund Account to the International Peacekeeping Account To Support Security Sector Reform in Liberia

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including section 610 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended (the “Act”), and section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, I hereby determine it necessary for the purposes of the Act that $11 million in FY 2006 funds made available under the Economic Support Fund account be transferred to, and consolidated with, funds made available under chapter 6 of part II of the Act, and such funds are hereby so transferred and consolidated. 

                    You are hereby authorized and directed to report this determination to the Congress and to publish it in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

[FR Doc. 07-2581

Billing code 4710-10-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26406-26407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2294]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Cancer Institute Director's Consumer Liaison Group.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.


[[Page 26407]]


    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Director's Consumer 
Liaison Group.
    Date: June 13, 2007.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 2:30 p.m.
    Agenda: 1. Approval of Minutes; 2. Report from Dr. John E. 
Niederhuber, NCI Director; 3. Reports on NCI Budget; DCLG member 
activity; 4. Report on the National Community Cancer Center Program, 
Advisory Committee and Pilot Project; 5. Public Comment; 6. Action 
Items and Conclusion.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Barbara Guest, Executive Secretary, Office of 
Liaison Activities, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes 
of Health, 6116 Executive Blvd, Room 2202, Bethesda, MD 20892-8324, 
301-496-0307, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ee899b8b9d9a8cae838f8782c0808786c0898198"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="33544656404751735e525a5f1d5d5a5b1d545c45">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/dclg/dclg.htm, where an agenda 
and any additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Preventive Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 30, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2294 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 246 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to exempt elementary and 

secondary schools from the fee imposed on employers filing petitions 

with respect to non-immigration workers under the H–1B program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2009 

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to exempt 

elementary and secondary schools from the fee imposed 

on employers filing petitions with respect to non-immigration workers under the H–1B program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM FILING FEES FOR SCHOOLS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 214(c)(9)(A) of the Immi5 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(c)(9)(A)) is 

6 amended by inserting ‘‘an employer that is a public or pri7 vate elementary or secondary school and’’ after ‘‘(exclud8 ing’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

HR 246 IH 

1 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub2 section (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

3 of this Act and shall apply to petitions filed under section 

4 214(c)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act on or 

5 after such date and before October 1, 2001. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                SIPEX CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sipex Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Phillip A. Kagel,
Senior Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit accompanying such Report and shall not be deemed filed
pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

/s/ Phillip A. Kagel
------------------------------
Phillip A. Kagel
Senior Vice President, Finance
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
March 15, 2004
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 54 (Wednesday, March 20, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 17181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06192]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 54 / Wednesday, March 20, 2013 / 
Notices

[[Page 17181]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Notice of Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to 
OMB for Review

SUMMARY: U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has 
submitted the following information collection to OMB for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. 
Comments regarding this information collection are best assured of 
having their full effect if received within 30 days of this 
notification. Comments should be addressed to: Desk Officer for USAID, 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB), Washington DC 20503. Copies of submission may be obtained 
by calling (202) 712-5007.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    OMB Number: OMB 0412-059.
    Form Number: AID Form 566-01, AID 566-02, AID 566-03, AID 566-04 
and AID 566-05.
    Title: Inquiry for Employment, Residence, Personal, Education and 
Law.
    Type of Submission: Reinstatement of Information Collection.
    Purpose: USAID is required by Executive order that Background 
investigations be conducted on all persons entering Federal Service. 5 
U.S.C. 3301 and 5 CFR 5.2 require that investigations and 
determinations be made concerning the qualifications and fitness of 
applicants for federal employment. A National Agency Check and written 
inquiries are the minimum investigation required for employment in any 
department or agency of the Government as prescribed in Section 3(a) of 
the Executive Order 10450.

Annual Reporting Burden

    Respondents: 120.
    Total annual responses: 120.
    Total annual hours requested: 30.

    Dated: March 11, 2013.
Lynn P. Winston,
Chief, Bureau for Management, Office of Management Services, 
Information and Records Division, U.S. Agency for International 
Development.
[FR Doc. 2013-06192 Filed 3-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
```
```

[House Report 107-99]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                     107-99

======================================================================

 
 PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 1157, THE PACIFIC SALMON RECOVERY 
                                  ACT

                                _______
                                

   June 12, 2001.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 163]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 163, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                Summary of Provisions of the Resolution

    The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 1157, 
the Pacific Salmon Recovery Act, under an open rule. The rule 
provides one hour of general debate divided equally between the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Resources.
    The rule waives clause 4(a) of rule XIII (requiring three-
day availability of the committee report) against consideration 
of the bill. The rule makes in order, as base text for purpose 
of amendment, the amendment printed in the Congressional Record 
and numbered 1, which shall be open for amendment by section.
    Members who have preprinted their amendments in the 
Congressional Record prior to their consideration will be given 
priority in recognition to offer their amendments if otherwise 
consistent with House rules. Additionally, the rule provides 
one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Finally, the rule lays H. Res. 156 on the table.

                                

```
EXHIBIT 99.15

CONSENT OF EXPERT

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F
(the Form 40-F) of Cameco Corporation (the Corporation) to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

I hereby consent to reference to my name and my involvement in the preparation of, or supervision of the preparation of, scientific and
technical information in the following instances:



| | (a) | under the headings Operations and Development Projects  Uranium Operating Properties  Inkai, Mineral Reserves and Resources and
Governance  Interest of Experts in the Corporations Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2012 dated February 22, 2013 for the Inkai property; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | under the headings Our Operations and Development Projects  Uranium Operating Properties  Inkai and Mineral Reserves and Resources
in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation for the year ended December 31, 2012 dated February 11, 2013 for the Inkai property,
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(collectively the Technical Information) in the Form 40-F, and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of information derived from
the Technical Information in the Form 40-F.

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such Technical
Information in the registration statements (Nos. 333-11736, 333-6180 and 333-139165) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Stock Option Plan, registration statement (No. 333-139324) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Employee Share Ownership
Plan and registration statement (No. 333-181577) on Form F-10.

Sincerely,



|                     |  |                                                                                   
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Lawrence Reimann
|Name:                |  | Lawrence Reimann, P. Eng.                                                         
|Title:               |  | Manager, Technical Services, Power Resources, Inc. (operating as Cameco Resources)
|                     | 
|Date:                |  | February 22, 2013
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Fielder, Appellee.

[Cite as *State v. Fielder*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 14.]

(No. 97-2323

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided November 25, 1998.)

*R. Larry Schneider,*Union County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Rick Rodger,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

The trial court’s finding that Michael Fielder is a sexual predator is reinstated.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.