alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending April 21, 2007

|Filer               | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|BANK OF LITTLE ROCK | * Branch       | Bank of Little Rock, Little Rock, Arkansas, to establish a branch facility to be located at 1201 Rahling Road, Little Rock, Arkansas. | Newspaper:04/29/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:          | 04/29/2007    
|Federal Register:   | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location          | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|FIRST BK, SAINT LOUIS, MISSOURI | 169653 | 07/24/2006 | 04/06/2007     | S         | Large Bank 
|FLORA B&TC, FLORA, ILLINOIS     | 777441 | 01/08/2007 | 04/13/2007     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule  15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Zvika Naggan, as Chief Executive Officer of  Cimatron Ltd. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that, to  my knowledge:

     (1)  The  accompanying annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2003, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the  “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

/s/ Zvika Naggan*

Zvika Naggan Chief Executive Officer  June 29, 2004 

* The originally executed copy of this Certification  will be maintained at the Company’s offices and will be furnished to the Securities  Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

CERTIFICATION

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Cimatron Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure control and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and


5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.


/s/ Eli Gendler*Eli GendlerChief Financial Officer
  Date: June 29, 2004

*The originally executed copy of this Certification
  will be maintained at the Companys offices and will be made available for inspection
  upon request.

---
§ 38.01-1 Scope of regulations—TB/ALL. ( a ) The regulations in this part contain requirements for the transportation of liquefied or compressed gases, whose primary hazard is one of flammability.
( b ) The transportation *on deck* of liquefied flammable gases in portable cylinders and tanks and the transportation of empty cylinders and portable tanks previously used shall be in accordance with the requirements of 49 CFR parts 171-179. The transportation of such containers *under deck* shall be in accordance with the requirements of § 38.01-2.
[CGFR 66-33, 31 FR 15269, Dec. 6, 1966, as amended by CGD 86-033, 53 FR 36024, Sept. 16, 1988]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending May 6, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
# C_2013225EN.01005705.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/57

---

Order of the President of the Court of 25 June 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-308/12) (1)

1

2013/C 225/116

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 273, 8.9.2012.

1

---
January 1, 2016

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption No. 12621

 Colorado Aerial Imaging

 Gregory Bergin

 greg@coaerialimaging.com

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–2209

Colorado Aerial Imaging (CAI) is requesting to amend their existing 333 

exemption. 

CAI has added the following 3 aircraft to their inventory:

1- DJI F550 Flame Wheel w/ NAZA M V2, E300 power system

a. Weight- ≈ 2500g

b. Size- 550mm

c. http://download.djiinnovations.com/downloads/flamewheel/en/F550_User_Manual_v1.9_e

n.pdf

2- DJI Phantom 2 with iosd-mini

a. Weight- ≈ 1300g

b. Size- 350mm

c. http://download.djiinnovations.com/downloads/phantom_2/en/PHANTOM2_User_Manual

_v1.2_en.pdf

3- DJI Phantom 3 Professional

a. Weight- ≈ 1280g

b. Size- 590mm

c. http://download.djiinnovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Phantom_3_Professional_

User_Manual_v1.0_en.pdf

Links for all manuals and more detailed specifications are included as attaching 

documentation will be too lengthy. CAI is in the process of obtaining N-numbers 

for all additional aircraft. 

Thank You,

Gregory Bergin
Colorado Aerial Imaging
#### § 35.20-10 Steering gear test—T/ALL.

On all tankships making voyages of more than 48 hours' duration, the entire steering gear, the whistle, the means of communication, and the signaling appliances between the bridge or pilothouse and engineroom shall be examined and tested by a licensed officer of the vessel within a period of not more than 12 hours before leaving port. All such vessels making voyages of less than 48 hours' duration or operating on lakes, bays, sounds, and rivers shall be so examined and tested at least once in every week. The fact and time of such examination and test shall be recorded in the ship's logbook.
#### William Barnett, *Appellant, v.*J. Monroe Taylor, *Respondent.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Opinion by

Pratt, J.
EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR


<PAGE>
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The  Board  of  Directors
Lexington  B  &  L  Financial  Corp.
Lexington,  Missouri  64067


We  hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the Registration
Statement  of  Lexington B & L Financial Corp. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-29807),
of  our  report dated November 28, 2001, accompanying the consolidated financial
statements incorporated by reference in Lexington B & L Financial Corp.'s Annual
Report  on  Form  10-KSB  for  the  year  ended  September  30,  2001.



/s/  Moore,  Horton  &  Carlson,  P.C.
Mexico,  Missouri
December  26,  2001


<PAGE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-03267, 333-19095, 333-33043, 333-33045 on Form S-8 and 333-33057, 333-33061
on Form S-3 of DecisionOne Holdings Corp., of our reports dated September 1,
1999, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DecisionOne Holdings Corp.
and DecisionOne Corporation for the year ended June 30, 1999.


Deloitte & Touche LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
December 6, 1999
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Annual report**
 
SuDoc Number:VA 1.1/10:

Item Number:0983-H-03 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000724637
 
FY09 | FY10| FY11 | FY13 | FY14 | FY15
 
September 21, 2020
exv10w10



 






Exhibit 10.10




Description of the 2005 Executive Incentive Plan




          In order to provide incentive to senior management to maximize profitability for fiscal year
2005, Intevac has adopted the 2005 Executive Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan provides for
payment of bonuses to eligible executives and senior managers, if the Company achieves positive
pretax income for the full year of 2005.




          The total amount available to be paid out under the Plan is determined by a formula based on a
percentage of Intevac’s pretax profitability for the full year of 2005.




          Each manager’s bonus will be determined by a formula based on four factors:





	 	1.  	Total amount available under the Plan,







	 	2.  	Base salary of each manager,






	 	3.  	Percentage of 2005 individual and division performance objectives
achieved, ranging from 0% to 150%, and






	 	4.  	Target bonus as a percentage of base pay by manager, ranging from 20%
to 200%.





          Target bonuses for each participating manager are calculated by multiplying each manager’s
base pay times their target bonus percentage times their percentage of performance objectives
achieved. If there is an insufficient amount available under the Plan to pay the target bonuses
for all participating managers, then a pro-rata allocation of the total amount available under the
Plan will be made based on each individual’s target bonus. For example, if the total amount
payable for bonuses under the Plan is equal to only half of the total of all target bonus
calculations, then each participating manager will receive only half of their target bonus.




          Participants in the Plan are not eligible to participate in Intevac’s employee profit sharing
plan. Bonus payments are anticipated to be made in February of 2006. The Plan is administered by
the Compensation Committee of Intevac’s Board of Directors, is not embodied in a formal written
document, and is scheduled to expire following any payouts made for the fiscal year ending December
31, 2005.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 28, 2014

d0421

Order 

Clerk

April 28, 2014

148496

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148496

COA: 310900

Macomb CC: 2011-002403-FH

DENNIS FRANK BOTHEL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 5, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

VIVIANO, J., did not participate because he presided over this case in the circuit 

court.
§ 172.245 Survival conditions. A vessel is presumed to survive assumed damage if it meets the following conditions in the final stage of flooding: ( a ) *Final waterline.* The final waterline, in the final condition of sinkage, heel, and trim must be below the lower edge of an opening through which progressive flooding may take place, such as an air pipe, or an opening that is closed by means of a weathertight door or hatch cover. This opening does not include an opening closed by a: ( 1 ) Watertight manhole cover;
( 2 ) Flush scuttle;
( 3 ) Small watertight cargo tank hatch cover that maintains the high integrity of the deck;
( 4 ) Class 1 door in a watertight bulkhead;
( 5 ) Remotely operated sliding watertight door;
( 6 ) Side scuttle of the nonopening type;
( 7 ) Retractable inflatable seal; or
( 8 ) Guillotine door.
( b ) *Heel angle.* The maximum angle of heel must not exceed 15 degrees, except that this angle may be increased to 17 degrees if no deck edge immersion occurs.
( c ) *Range of stability.* Through an angle of 20 degrees beyond its position of equilibrium after flooding, a vessel must meet the following conditions: ( 1 ) The righting arm curve must be positive.
( 2 ) The maximum righting arm must be at least 4 inches (10 cm).
( 3 ) Each submerged opening must be weathertight
( d ) *Metacentric height.* After flooding, the metacentric height must be at least 2 inches (50 mm) when the vessel is in the equilibrium position.
( e ) *Progressive flooding.* In the design calculations required by § 172.225, progressive flooding between spaces connected by pipes, ducts or tunnels must be assumed unless: ( 1 ) Pipes within the assumed extent of damage are equipped with arrangements such as stop check valves to prevent progressive flooding to other spaces with which they connect; and,
( 2 ) Progressive flooding through ducts or tunnels is protected against by: ( i ) Retractable inflatable seals to cargo hopper gates; or
( ii ) Guillotine doors in bulkheads in way of the conveyor belt.
Exhibit 99.3

                                  Certification
                       Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of  Highlands  Bankshares,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the period  ending  December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Robert M. Little,  Jr., Chief Financial  Officer,  Highlands  Bankshares,  Inc.,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         5.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         6.       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



/S/ Robert M. Little, Jr.
---------------------------
Robert M. Little, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer, Highlands Bankshares, Inc.
March 26, 2003


This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  Sec.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


[A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Highlands  Bankshares,  Inc.  and will be  retained  by  Highlands
Bankshares,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

DONALD WALLING and CELESTA WALLING, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-11289 

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

 

GRAFF CHEVROLET-MT. PLEASANT, INC., and 

MEMBERS FIRST CREDIT UNION, 

 Defendants, 

and 

MEMBERS FIRST CREDIT UNION, 

 Cross-Plaintiff, 

v. 

GRAFF CHEVROLET-MT. PLEASANT, INC., 

 Cross-Defendant. 

_______________________________________/ 

STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), Plaintiffs Donald Walling and 

Celesta Walling and Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff Members First Credit Union stipulated and 

agreed that the Complaint, Cross-claim, and all other claims in the above-captioned action be 

dismissed with prejudice. See ECF No. 13. 

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Complaint, ECF No. 

1, Cross-Plaintiff’s Cross-claim, ECF Nos. 7 & 10, and all claims in this case are DISMISSED 

with prejudice without fees and costs to any party. This is a final order and closes the case. 

Dated: July 13, 2015 s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

1:15-cv-11289-TLL-PTM Doc # 14 Filed 07/13/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 103
- 2 - 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on July 13, 2015. 

 s/Karri Sandusky 

 Karri Sandusky, Acting Case Manager 

1:15-cv-11289-TLL-PTM Doc # 14 Filed 07/13/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 104
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2412 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2412

 To exempt children of certain Filipino World War II veterans from the 
               numerical limitations on immigrant visas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2009

 Ms. Hirono (for herself, Mr. Abercrombie, Mr. Filner, Mr. Honda, Mr. 
Faleomavaega, Ms. Bordallo, Mrs. Maloney, and Mr. Farr) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To exempt children of certain Filipino World War II veterans from the 
               numerical limitations on immigrant visas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Filipino Veterans Family 
Reunification Act''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM IMMIGRANT VISA LIMIT.

    Section 201(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1151(b)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(F) Aliens who are eligible for an immigrant visa under 
        paragraph (1) or (3) of section 203(a) and who have a parent 
        who was naturalized pursuant to section 405 of the Immigration 
        Act of 1990 (8 U.S.C. 1440 note).''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         648,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,772,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  269,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    51,000
<INVENTORY>                                    168,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,872,000
<PP&E>                                       2,727,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,061,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,605,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          730,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,000
<COMMON>                                       174,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,618,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,605,000
<SALES>                                      1,051,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,051,000
<CGS>                                          161,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,538,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (434,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (434,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (434,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)


</TABLE>