alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2079 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resources 

study of the Honouliuli Internment Camp site in the State of Hawaii, 

to determine the suitability and feasibility of establishing a unit of 

the National Park System. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2009 

Ms. HIRONO (for herself, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. 

FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. HONDA, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. WU, Mr. SABLAN, Ms. 

RICHARDSON, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, and Mr. AL GREEN of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a 

special resources study of the Honouliuli Internment 

Camp site in the State of Hawaii, to determine the 

suitability and feasibility of establishing a unit of the 

National Park System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honouliuli Internment 

5 Camp Special Resources Study Act of 2009’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2079 IH

1 SEC. 2. STUDY OF INCLUSION OF HONOULIULI INTERN2 MENT CAMP SITE IN NATIONAL PARK SYS3 TEM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior (re5 ferred to in this section as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall conduct 

6 a special resource study of the national significance, suit7 ability, and feasibility of including the Honouliuli Gulch 

8 and associated sites within the State of Hawaii in the Na9 tional Park System. 

10 (b) GUIDELINES.—In conducting the study, the Sec11 retary shall use the criteria for the study of areas for po12 tential inclusion in the National Park System described 

13 in section 8 of Public Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5). 

14 (c) CONSULTATION.—In conducting the study, the 

15 Secretary shall consult with— 

16 (1) the State of Hawaii; 

17 (2) appropriate Federal agencies; 

18 (3) Native Hawaiian and local government enti19 ties; 

20 (4) private and nonprofit organizations; 

21 (5) private land owners; and 

22 (6) other interested parties. 

23 (d) THEMES.—The study shall evaluate the 

24 Honouliuli Gulch, associated sites located on Oahu, and 

25 other islands located in the State of Hawaii with respect 

26 to— 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2079 IH

1 (1) the significance of the site as a component 

2 of World War II; 

3 (2) the significance of the site as the site re4 lated to the forcible internment of Japanese Ameri5 cans, European Americans, and other individuals; 

6 and 

7 (3) historic resources at the site. 

8 (e) REPORT.—Not later than 2 years after the date 

9 of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 

10 the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Rep11 resentatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 

12 Resources of the Senate a report describing the findings, 

13 conclusions, and recommendations of the study required 

14 under this section. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2541 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2541

   To provide funding for multi-jurisdictional anti-gang task forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 21, 2009

  Mr. Dent (for himself, Mr. Bilbray, and Mr. Gerlach) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide funding for multi-jurisdictional anti-gang task forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Anti-Gang Task Force Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. ASSISTANCE FOR MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL ANTI-GANG TASK FORCES.

    (a) In General.--The Attorney General, in consultation with 
appropriate State and local officials, shall--
            (1) establish anti-gang task forces, consisting of Federal, 
        State, and local law enforcement authorities, for the 
        coordinated investigation, disruption, apprehension, and 
        prosecution of criminal gangs and offenders;
            (2) direct the reassignment or detailing from any Federal 
        department or agency (subject to the approval of the head of 
        that department or agency, in the case of a department or 
        agency other than the Department of Justice) of personnel to 
        each task force;
            (3) provide all necessary funding for the operation of the 
        task force; and
            (4) provide all necessary funding for national and regional 
        meetings of task forces, and all other related organizations, 
        as needed, to ensure effective operation of such teams through 
        the sharing of intelligence, best practices and for any other 
        related purpose.
    (b) Membership.--The task forces shall consist of agents and 
officers, where feasible, from--
            (1) the Federal Bureau of Investigation;
            (2) the Drug Enforcement Administration;
            (3) the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and 
        Explosives;
            (4) the United States Marshals Service;
            (5) the Directorate of Border and Transportation Security 
        of the Department of Homeland Security;
            (6) the Department of Housing and Urban Development;
            (7) State and local law enforcement; and
            (8) Federal, State, and local prosecutors.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated $20,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2009 through 2012 
to carry out this section.
                                 <all>
```
1 John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Re t.), Seventh C ourt of Appeal s, si tt ing by assignment. Tex. Gov’tCode An n. §7 5.00 2(a) (1) (V erno n Su pp. 2 002 ). NO. 07-03-0058-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL E FEBRUARY

13, 2003

______________________________ TRACY SCOGIN FRENCH, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE 411 TH DISTRIC T COURT O F POLK COU NTY; NO. 16457; HON. ROBERT HILL TRAP P, PRESIDING

_______________________________ ORDER ON APPELLANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

_______________________________ Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ., an d BOYD, S.J. 1 Tracy Scogin French, appellant, has moved to dismiss the appeal pursuant to Rule 42.2 of th e Tex as R ules of Appel late Procedur e. Without passing on the mer its of the case, we grant the moti on pursuant to Texas Rule of Appell ate Procedure 42.1( a)(2) and2

dismiss the app eal. H avin g dis mi ssed th e appeal at appell ant’s personal request, no motion for reheari ng wil l be entertaine d, and our mandate w ill issu e forthwith.
Brian Quinn Justice Do not publish
.
§ 503.58 Appeals of denials of mandatory declassification review requests. ( a ) Within 60 days after the receipt of denial of a request for mandatory declassification review, the requester may submit an appeal in writing to the Chairman through the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573. The appeal shall: ( 1 ) Identify the document in the same manner in which it was identified in the original request;
( 2 ) Indicate the dates of the request and denial, and the expressed basis for the denial; and
( 3 ) State briefly why the document should be declassified.
( b ) The Chairman shall rule on the appeal within 60 working days of receiving it. If additional time is required to make a determination, the Chairman shall notify the requester of the additional time needed and provide the requester with the reason for the extension. The Chairman shall notify the requester in writing of the final determination and the reasons for any denial.
( c ) In accordance with section 5.3 of Executive Order 13526 and 32 CFR 2001.33, within 60 days of such issuance, the requester may appeal a final determination of the Commission under paragraph (b) of this section to the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel. The appeal should be addressed to, Executive Secretary, Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel, Attn: Classification Challenge Appeals, c/o Information Security Oversight Office, National Archives and Records Administration, 7th and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 5W, Washington, DC 20408.
[76 FR 10264, Feb. 24, 2011]
<PAGE>   1


                                   EXHIBIT 23

              CONSENTS OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




<PAGE>   2

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference and use of our report dated
January 10, 1997, which appears in Commercial National Financial Corporation's
annual report on Form 10-K for 1996, in that corporation's previously filed
registration statements, as amended, for that corporation's 1989 Stock Option
Plan (Registration No. 33-30392), Dividend Reinvestment Plan (Registration No.
33-30239), and 1991 Stock Option Plan (Registration No. 33-39772 and 33-92666).




                                        CROWE, CHIZEK AND COMPANY LLP

                                        CROWE, CHIZEK AND COMPANY LLP



March 20, 1997
South Bend, Indiana

<PAGE>   3
                               [BDO LETTERHEAD]
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Commercial National Financial Corporation
Ithaca, Michigan


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference and use of our report dated
January 17, 1996, which appears in Commercial National Financial Corporation's
annual report on Form 10-K for 1996, in that corporation's previously filed
registration statements, as amended, for that corporation's 1989 Stock Option
Plan (Registration No. 33-30392), Dividend Reinvestment Plan (Registration No.
33-30239), and 1991 Stock Option Plan (Registration No. 33-39772 and 33-92666).




BDO Seidman, LLP
Grand Rapids, Michigan
March 26, 1997
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with thefiling of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter Ended September 30,2005 (the “Report”) by American Medical Alert Corp. (“Registrant”), theundersigned hereby certifies that:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Registrant.

 

 
|   |   /s/ Jack  Rhian |   |
|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|   | Jack Rhian                  |
|   | President and               |
|   | Chief Operating Officer     |

 

**Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to American Medical Alert Corp. and will be retained by AmericanMedical Alert Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.**

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 102 (Tuesday, May 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 29579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2648]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE


Notice of Sunshine Act Meeting

Date/Time: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 (9 a.m.-8 p.m.) Thursday, June 14, 
2007 (9:30 a.m.-4 p.m.)

Location: NDU--National War College, Roosevelt Hall, Ft. McNair, 300 
5th Avenue, Washington, DC.

Status: Open Session--Portions may be closed pursuant to Subsection (c) 
of Section 552(b) of Title 5, United States Code, as provided in 
subsection 1706(h)(3) of the United States Institute of Peace Act, 
Public Law 98-525.

Agenda: June 2007 Board Meeting; Approval of Minutes of the One Hundred 
Twenty-Sixth Meeting (March 12, 2007) of the Board of Directors; 
Chairman's Report; President's Report; Program Updates; Selection of 
National Peace Essay Contest Winners; Selection of Peace Scholars; 
Other General Issues.

Contact: Tessie F. Higgs, Executive Office, Telephone: (202) 429-3836.

    Dated: May 22, 2007.
Patricia P. Thompson,
Executive Vice President, United States Institute of Peace.
[FR Doc. 07-2648 Filed 5-24-07; 11:09 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-AR-M
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending October 21, 2006

|Filer                    | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------ | ------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|PATRIOT BANCSHARES, INC. | * 3A5         | Patriot Bancshares, Inc., Houston, Texas, to acquire by merger 100 percent of Northeast Bancshares, Inc., Mesquite, Texas, and indirectly acquire Northeast Bancshares-Delaware, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware, and Northeast National Bank, Mesquite, Texas. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:11/17/2006
|Newspaper:               | Not available
|Federal Register:        | 11/17/2006   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

EDWARD VERZEL DODSON, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

CARMEN PALMER, 

 Respondent. 

 

Case No. 15-12320 

HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH 

___________________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. 9) 

 Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Through 

counsel, he challenged his convictions for armed robbery, Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.529, and 

fourth-degree fleeing and eluding, Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.602a(2). On July 9, 2018, Petitioner’s 

counsel filed a motion to dismiss the action in its entirety, because Petitioner was declared dead 

on February 8, 2018 (Dkt. 9). In support, counsel attaches the Certificate of Death signed by the 

Lapeer County medical examiner. See Death Certificate, attached to Mot. to Dismiss, 

PageID.1069 

 Article III, § 2 of the United States Constitution requires the existence of a case or 

controversy through all stages of federal judicial proceedings. This means that, throughout the 

litigation, the petitioner “must have suffered, or be threatened with, an actual injury traceable to 

the defendant and likely to be redressed by a favorable judicial decision.” Lewis v. Continental 

Bank Corp., 494 U.S. 472, 477 (1990). An incarcerated habeas petitioner's challenge to the validity 

of his or her conviction satisfies the case-or-controversy requirement because the incarceration 

constitutes a concrete injury which can be redressed by the invalidation of the conviction. See

Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998). Here, any injury suffered by Petitioner would not be 
2 

redressable by a favorable judicial decision. Accordingly, Petitioner’s motion is granted and the 

petition is hereby dismissed as moot. 

 SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 16, 2018 s/Mark A. Goldsmith 

 Detroit, Michigan MARK A. GOLDSMITH 

 United States District Judge 

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any 

unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail 

addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on July 16, 2018. 

 s/Karri Sandusky 

 Case Manager
§ 53.12-1 General (modifies HG-600 through HG-640). ( a ) The instruments, fittings and controls for heating boilers must be as indicated in HG-600 through HG-640 of Section IV of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 53.01-1) except as noted otherwise in this section.
( b ) For control systems for automatic auxiliary heating equipment, the requirements in part 63 of this subchapter govern and must be followed.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18826, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65164, Oct. 31, 2008]
EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-32805, No. 333-02857, No. 333-02859, No. 333-42769 and No. 33-32970, No. 333-54958, No. 333-54960 and No. 333-108754 of Zila, Inc. on Form S-8 and Registration Statements No. 33-46239, No. 333-06019, No. 333-00645, No. 333-31651 and No. 333-43097 of Zila, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report dated October 26, 2003 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Zila, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2003.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP Phoenix, Arizona October 26, 2003
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Francis L. Simola, Chairman, President and CEO of PowerCold Corporation (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.  This Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 30, 2004



/s/ Francis L. Simola

Francis L. Simola

Chairman, President and CEO
see reuse policy

see reuse policy

see reuse policy

see reuse policy

see reuse policy

see reuse policy

see reuse policy

see reuse policy

see reuse policy
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0938 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-271-AD 

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance) Action 

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement) 

Do not include oncondition costs here 

Work-hours 

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up) 

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our) 

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts) 

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet 

Chem-Mill Step 

Inspection 36.7 $3,119.50 $3,119.50 6 $18,717.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $18,717 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs:

Action 

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement) 

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup) 

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour) 

Parts Cost Cost per Product 

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): All parts are to 
be furnished by the operator. Therefore, an estimate of the parts cost is not include in the Total 

Costs summary. 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
#### § 4.05-40 Alternate electronic means of reporting.

The Commandant may approve alternate electronic means of submitting notices and reports required under this subpart.

[USCG-1999-6216, 64 FR 53223, Oct. 1, 1999]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
DOVER SADDLERY, INC. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers certifies, to the best
knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                               |  |  |  |                                        
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------
|/s/ Stephen L. Day                                             |  |  |  | /s/ David R. Pearce                    
|Stephen L. Day President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director |  |  |  | David R. Pearce Chief
Financial Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)                                  |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)          
|                                                               |  | 
|Date: August 14, 2012                                          |  |  |  | Date: August 14, 2012