alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Passaic County Circuit Court.

#### ABRAHAM APPEL, CLAIMANT, PLAINTIFF, v. PETER FLEUCHAUS, OWNER AND BUILDER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

For the plaintiff, *Feder & Rinzler.*

For the defendants, *Samuel Rosenfeld.*

Porter, J.

This is a suit on mechanics’ lien and was referred to Louis A. Cowley, referee, by order dated December 1st, 1937. The master reported under date of January 35th, 1938, and his report duly confirmed by order of February 6th, 1938. Thereafter an application was made to set aside the judgment so entered on the ground that the defendant had not had notice of the hearing before the referee and had not appeared -at hearing, and order was entered, dated April 3d, 1938, that the matter be opened so that the defendant could appear before the master and submit proofs and testimony and to cross-examine witnesses of the plaintiff.

Further hearing was had and report of the referee was filed, dated October 17th, 1938, which is now sought to be confirmed by the plaintiff, to which objection is made by the defendant on various grounds.

First, it is contended that no notice was given by the plaintiff of the filing of the r'eport. There was a notice of some sort served and a hearing had and exceptions filed. I think that notice was sufficient to comply with the terms of the rule.

*201Second, that the referee had no jurisdiction because he failed to take an oath to faithfully and fairly hear and examine the cause, and so forth. The defendant cannot now be heard to complain in this regard, because he submitted himself to the jurisdiction and participated in the hearing, nor was the question raised when the matter was before the court after the first referee’s report. Not having participated in that, the matter should then have been raised if the defendant wished relief on that ground.

The other grounds raised, three, four, five and six, are without merit. Three and four relate to questions of fact, which are solely within the province of the referee and not of the court.

Five and six relate to the referee’s permitting the plaintiff to examine witnesses in the absence of the defendant or his counsel and refusing to later permit such witnesses to be recalled. Those matters were within the discretion of the referee and they do not justify the withholding of confirmation of the report. Especially is this true when it is realized from the proofs that there were extensive hearings and a number of witnesses examined, and that the master had ample opportunity, because of the various hearings held, to hear all of the testimony and to correctly arrive at the facts in controversy.

An order will be made confirming the report.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 1, 2021

No. 04

- 20

- 00018

- CV

DICEX INTERNATIONAL, INC

., Appellant

v.

AMIGO STAFFING, INC

., Appellee

From the 111th Judicial District Court

, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CVK0 00091

- D2

Honorable Monica Z. Notzon , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Appellant’s unopposed motion for extension of time in which to file a motion for en banc

reconsideration is GRANTED. The motion is due no later than August 6, 2021.

It is so ORDERED on July 1, 2021

.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS ON PAGES
F-3 AND F-4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDING JULY
31, 1997, AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON ????? AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,789
<SECURITIES>                                     3,253
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,102
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (75)
<INVENTORY>                                        302
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,122
<PP&E>                                           4,781
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,735)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,606
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,596
<OTHER-SE>                                      (7,034)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,168
<SALES>                                         13,578
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,293
<CGS>                                            4,563
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,563
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,486
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    75
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,975)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,975)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.52)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 252 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 252

To provide that no more than 50 percent of funding made available under 
 the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981 for any fiscal year 
                 be provided for home heating purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2009

   Mr. Gene Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 
 the Committee on Education and Labor, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that no more than 50 percent of funding made available under 
 the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981 for any fiscal year 
                 be provided for home heating purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``LIHEAP Equity Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

    Section 2604(a)(1) of the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 
1981 (42 U.S.C. 8623(a)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A) by striking ``subparagraph (B)'' 
        and inserting ``subparagraphs (B) and (C)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Not more than 50 percent of amounts 
                appropriated for carrying out this title for any fiscal 
                year shall be provided for home heating purposes.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 25.26-10 EPIRB requirements for uninspected passenger vessels. ( a ) Uninspected passenger vessels less than 100 gross tons are not required to carry an EPIRB.
( b ) The owner, operator, or master of an uninspected passenger vessel of at least 100 gross tons must ensure that the vessel does not operate beyond three miles from shore as measured from the territorial sea baseline seaward or more than three miles from the coastline of the Great Lakes, unless it has onboard a float-free, automatically activated Category 1 406 MHz EPIRB stowed in a manner so that it will float free if the vessel sinks.
[USCG-1999-5040, 67 FR 34776, May 15, 2002]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 77 (Monday, April 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2001]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Antiviral Drugs Advisory Committee; Amendment of Notice

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an amendment 
to the notice of meeting of the Antiviral Drugs Advisory Committee. 
This meeting was announced in the Federal Register of February 2, 2007 
(72 FR 5724). The amendment is being made to reflect a change in the 
Location portion of the document. There are no other changes.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cicely Reese, Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research (HFD-21), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 
Fishers Lane (for express delivery, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1093) 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-7001, FAX: 301-827-6776, e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5d1e343e383124732f38382e381d3b393c7335352e733a322b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4f0c262c2a2336613d2a2a3c2a0f292b2e6127273c61282039">[email protected]</span></a>, or FDA Advisory Committee Information Line, 
1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the Washington DC area), code 
3014512531. Please call the Information Line for up-to-date information 
on this meeting.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of February 7, 2007, 
FDA announced that a meeting of the Antiviral Drugs Advisory Committee 
would be held on April 24, 2007. On page 5724, in the first column, the 
Location portion of document is amended to read as follows:
    Location: Crowne Plaza Hotel, Kennedy Ballrooms, 8777 Georgia Ave., 
Silver Spring, MD. The hotel telephone number is 800-971-4654.
    This notice is issued under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. app. 2) and 21 CFR part 14, relating to advisory committees.

    Dated: April 18, 2007.
Randall W. Lutter,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. 07-2001 Filed 4-18-07; 2:52 pm]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the "Report"),  I, Gilbert J. Pomar,  III,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       To my  knowledge,  the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
         of  operations  of the Company as of and for the period  covered by the
         Report.

Date:  August 13, 2003            By: /s/ Gilbert J. Pomar, III
      ----------------                ------------------------------------------
                                      Gilbert J. Pomar, III, President and Chief
                                        Executive Officer
nORIGINALINTHESUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFMONTANAL:PR22-0003LFEB082022INREPETITIONOFDUSTINL.KUIPERSFORLEAVETOSITFORBAREXAMINATIONBowenGreenwoodClerkofSuprerneCourtstateofMontanaORDERDustinL.KuipershaspetitionedtheCourtforpermissiontositfortheFebruary2022MontanaBarExam.RuleIII.I,RulesofAdmissiontotheBarofMontana,requiresthatanapplicantwhohasbeenunsuccessfulinthreeormoreattemptstotaketheBarExammustobtainpermissionfrorntheCourttoretaketheexam,andmust"includeastudyplanandanexplanationofthestepstakenandtobetakenbytheapplicanttoimprovethelikelihoodoftheapplicant'ssuccessfulcompletionoftheexamination."ThepetitionsetsforthaplanforKuiperstopreparefortheexam,includingregistrationinanationalpreparatoryprogram.TheStateBarreportsthatKuipershaspreviouslysubmittedthenecessarydocumentationtositfortheFebruary2022examadministration.Goodcauseappearing,ITISHEREBYORDEREDthatthepetitionofDustinL.KuipersforleavetositfortheFebruary2022adrninistrationoftheMontanaBarExaminationisGRANTED.TheClerkisdirectedtomailacopyhereoftoDustinL.KuipersandtotheBarAdmissionsAdministratoroftheStateBarofMontana.DATEDthisdayofFebruary,2022.ChiefJ02/08/2022Case Number: PR 22-0003Justices74-2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                    5
<MULTIPLIER>                             1,000

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                  JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                                      JUL-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                       JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                                     570
<SECURITIES>                                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                           30,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           (1,050)
<INVENTORY>                                                             16,652
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                        62,056
<PP&E>                                                                 107,334
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        (35,325)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                         143,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                   43,262
<BONDS>                                                                 67,326
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                                43,886
<OTHER-SE>                                                            (24,535)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                           143,897
<SALES>                                                                217,665
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                       217,665
<CGS>                                                                  191,172
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          191,172
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                        58,863
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                       5,848
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       (36,437)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          (10,898)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   (25,539)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          (25,539)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                           (1.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           (1.97)


</TABLE>
Compensatory Agreements



 EXHIBIT (10)(3) 
  
 Compensatory Arrangement with the Board of Directors 
  
 Effective as of October 12, 2004, non-employee board members will receive an annual retainer of $20,000 if they do not serve as the chairperson of any
committee. If they serve as a committee chairperson, they will receive an additional $5,000, except for the chairman of the audit committee, who will receive an additional $10,000. Each director will receive $1,500 for each meeting of the Board of
Directors and $1,000 for each meeting of the committees thereof that they attend, except that they will receive only $500 if a meeting is attended by teleconference. Each director receives a grant of 30,000 C-COR non-qualified stock options upon his
or her initial election as a director, 10,000 of which vest immediately and the remaining 20,000 vesting equally over the immediately following two years. An annual grant of 7,500 C-COR non-qualified stock options is granted to each Director
thereafter; these options fully vest one year after grant. The strike price of the options is equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. 
  
 Compensatory Arrangements with Certain Named Executive Officers 
  
 The following named executive officers of the Registrant (as of the Registrant’s 2004 Proxy Statement) do not have
employment agreements with the Registrant and, accordingly, their employment with the Registrant is “at will.” For the Registrant’s 2005 fiscal year, the annual base salary for each named executive below is the following: 

 

					
	 Name and Title

	  	Fiscal 2005 Salary

	 
		
	 John O. Caezza
President, Broadband Communications
Products Division
	  	$	245,000	 
		
	 William T. Hanelly
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
	  	$	235,000	 
		
	 Gerhard B. Nederlof
Vice President EuroPacific Business
	  	$	293,994	(1)
		
	 Kenneth A. Wright
Chief Technology Officer
	  	$	230,000	 

  

	(1)	Annual compensation is denominated in euros and has been converted to US dollars at an exchange rate of 1.32889. 

  
 The annual base salaries are subject to adjustment pursuant to the
Registrant’s employee compensation policies in effect from time to time. Each of the above executive officers has a change of control agreement and an indemnification agreement, which are included as exhibits to the Registrant’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 25, 2004 (the “2004 10-K”). Also, each executive officer is eligible to receive a bonus and other employee benefits pursuant to the Registrant’s employee benefit plans, including
those that are included as exhibits to the 2004 10-K.
# C_2012058EN.01001002.xml

| 25.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/10

---

Action brought on 16 December 2011 — Boehringer Ingelheim International v OHIM (RELY-ABLE)

(Case T-640/11)

2012/C 58/19

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH (Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, A. Renck and C. Steudtner, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 September 2011 in case R 756/2011-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 September 2011 in case R 756/2011-4;

| — | Order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘RELY-ABLE’ for services in classes 38, 41 and 42 — International Registration (IR) No 1044333

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejected the protection of the mark in the European Union for all the services applied for.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal erred in finding that the sign applied for is ‘not particularly fanciful or arbitrary’ and an ‘obvious misspelling of the word reliable’ with the result that it would be perceived as laudatory. It further erred when assuming that misspellings are ‘a frequent feature of promotional messages’ and that this was relevant to the case at hand.

Pleas in law:

---
### MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 10

- 00842

- CR Allen Michael MCLEAN , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas , Appellee From the County Court at Law No. 7 , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 303961 Honorable Monica Guerrero , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Delivered and Filed: January 12, 2011
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION On March 17, 2010, Allen Michael McLean was placed on deferred adjudication community supervision in accordance with his plea

- bargain agreement. On November 8, 2010, at a revocation hearing, the trial court found that McLean had violated Condition No. 2 of his community supe rvision, but decided to continue his deferred adjudication community supervision for “nine months from expiration, with 120 days of the Substance Abuse Treatment04

- 10

- 00842

- CR

- 2

- Facility.” On November 22, 2010, McLean filed a notice of appeal, seeking to appeal the trial
court ’ s order modifying the conditions of his deferred adjudication community supervision. However, modification of the “terms of deferred adjudication, like appeals from the modification of terms of probation, are not authorized by the legislature.” Qu aglia v. State , 906 S.W.2d 112, 113 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1995, no pet.). “If anything, the decision to modify the appellant’s deferred adjudication instead of proceeding with adjudication was part of the decision whether to proceed with an adjudication o f guilt, for which appeal is expressly forbidden.” Id. Thus, because it appeared as though we had no jurisdiction over this appeal, on December 13, 2010, we ordered McLean to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. McLe an’s attorney has filed a response agreeing that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. We, therefore, dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ELVIN RAFAEL MATEO,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 700 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 9th day of March, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.