alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[House Report 107-117]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    107-117

======================================================================

 
  PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION FOR THE 
 ADJOURNMENT OF THE HOUSE AND SENATE FOR THE INDEPENDENCE DAY DISTRICT 
                              WORK PERIOD

                                _______
                                

   June 27, 2001.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

Ms. Pryce of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 182]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 182, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                  SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for the consideration of a 
concurrent resolution of either House providing for the 
adjournment of the two Houses during the Independence Day 
district work period. The rule waives all points of order 
against the consideration of the resolution.
    Section 2 of the rule provides that H. Res. 179 is laid on 
the table.
    While adjournment resolutions are ordinarily privileged, a 
point of order could be raised against the July 4th district 
work period resolution on the grounds that it violates section 
309 of the Budget Act, which requires that the House cannot 
adjourn for more than three calendar days in July if it has not 
completed action on all appropriations bills.

                                

```
#### § 401.120 Federal reservation of pilotage regulations.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76347, Sept. 17, 2024.

No state, municipal, or other local authority shall require the use of pilots or regulate any aspect of pilotage in any of the waters specified in the Act. Only those persons registered as United States Registered Pilots or Canadian Registered Pilots as defined in this subpart may render pilotage services on any vessel subject to the Act and the Memorandum of Arrangements, Great Lakes Pilotage.

[26 FR 951, Jan. 31, 1961. Redesignated at 61 FR 32655, June 25, 1996, and further redesignated by USCG-1998-3976, 63 FR 35139, June 29, 1998]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of  Interlink  Electronics,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K/A for the period ended  December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Charles C. Best, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

/S/  CHARLES C. BEST
-------------------------------------
Charles C. Best
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
March 30, 2007
#### Demorest *v.*Eastman *& a.*

No action can be maintained to recover the price of goods which the vendee has been induced to purchase through the fraudulent representations of the plaintiff, if the vendee, upon discovery of the fraud, seasonably offers to return them.

Assumpsit, to recover for goods sold. Facts found by the court. The defendants, by means of the false representations of the plaintiff’s agent, of which she had knowledge and subsequently ratified, were induced to purchase the goods in question. Subsequently, upon discovery of the fraud, they seasonably notified the plaintiff that they rescinded the contract of sale, and offered to return the goods, and afterwards kept them, subject to the plaintiff’s order.

*Hobbs*and *Fife,*for the plaintiff.

*Pitman*and *Smith,*for the defendants.

Stanley, J.

The defendants had the right to rescind, and having notified the plaintiff to that effect, and offered to return the goods, no action can now be maintained against them to recover the price.

*Exception overruled.*

Foster, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice; extension of comment period. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The comment period for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement                               ( print page 3117)                            (DEIS) for the request for Department of the Army authorization, pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbor Act, from Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Phosphate Division (PCS) for the continuation of its phosphate mining operation near Aurora, Beaufort County, NC published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Friday, October 20, 2006 (71 FR 61962), required comments be submitted by January 22, 2007. The comment period has been extended until February 9, 2007.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Tom Walker, Telephone (828) 271-7980 ext. 222.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-282 Filed 1-23-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-GN-M
Attachment J

Re: **Supplemental Final Performance Report (**  **Supplement )**  for Graduate Assistance of Areas in National Need (GAANN) Grant Number XXXX Dear Project Director : In accordance with Section 75.118 of the Education Department General Adm inistrative Regulations (EDGAR), Section 648.66 of the GAANN Program Regulations, and the reporting requirements for yo ur grant noted in the Notice for fiscal year XXX X in which your grant competed and received funding of a GAANN grant , you are required to submit a s upplement al report two years after submission of the final performance report
. T he online reporting sy stem will be available on XXXX for you to revise and submit the supplement al report for your referenced GAANN grant
. Data in the report is based on the final performance report submitted two years ago on this award, and should be updated for each fellow that is reported. **Please note that the deadline for submitting the**  **Supplement is**  **XXXX .**  At the time the sy stem opens, you will receive additional information needed to access the sy stem
. Please know that only

a fellow’s edu cational and employ ment status, if applicable, needs to be updated
. If you have an y questions, please contact XXXX or XXXX or b y e - mail at OPE_GAANN_Program@ed.gov
. Sincerel y,

XXXX
§ 503.54 Original classification. ( a ) No Commission Member or employee has the authority to originally classify information.
( b ) If a Commission Member or employee develops information that appears to require classification, or receives any foreign government information as defined in section 6.1(s) of Executive Order 13526, the Member or employee shall immediately notify the Senior Agency Official and appropriately protect the information.
( c ) If the Senior Agency Official believes the information warrants classification, it shall be sent to the appropriate agency with original classification authority over the subject matter, or to the Information Security Oversight Office, for review and a classification determination.
( d ) If there is reasonable doubt about the need to classify information, it shall be safeguarded as if it were classified pending a determination by an original classification authority. If there is reasonable doubt about the appropriate level of classification, it shall be safeguarded at the higher level of classification pending a determination by an original classification authority.
[49 FR 44401, Nov. 6, 1984, as amended at 64 FR 23548, May 3, 1999; 76 FR 10263, Feb. 24, 2011]
#### § 35.05-1 Officers and crews of tankships—T/ALL.

No tankship of the United States shall be navigated unless she shall have in her service and on board such complement of officers and crew, including lifeboatmen and tankermen where required by the regulations in this subchapter, separately stated, as called for in her certificate of inspection.

[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16704, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11265, Mar. 16, 2009]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

 SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

 No. 15-cr-20351 

 v. 

 Hon. Sean F. Cox 

D-1 SHAHID TAHIR, 

D-2 WASEEM ALAM, M.D., 

D-3 HATEM ATAYA, M.D., 

D-4 MANAWAR JAVED, and 

D-5 MUHAMMAD TARIQ, 

 Defendants. 

________________________________/ 

 

ORDER ADJOURNING TRIAL DATE 

AND FINDING EXCLUDABLE DELAY

 Upon consideration of Defendants’ unopposed oral motion for an 

adjournment, and for the reasons stated from the bench during the hearing held on 

July 15, 2015, 

IT IS ORDERED that the jury trial scheduled for this matter is adjourned 

from August 11, 2015, to April 5, 2016, at 8:30 am. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a status conference will occur on 

October 16, 2015, at 2:00 pm. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated during the 

hearing held on July 15, 2015, the ends of justice served by delaying the trial until 

April 5, 2016, outweigh the interests of Defendants and of the public in a speedy 

2:15-cr-20351-SFC-MKM Doc # 74 Filed 07/21/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 175
2 

trial and that the time period from July 15, 2015, through April 5, 2016, is deemed 

excludable delay under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h), and specifically 

by reason of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7). 

SO ORDERED 

Dated: July 21, 2015 s/ Sean F. Cox 

Judge Sean F. Cox 

United States District Judge 

 

I hereby certify that on July 21, 2015, the document above was served on counsel 

and/or the parties of record via electronic means and/or First Class Mail. 

 s/ Jennifer McCoy 

 Case Manager 

 

 

 

2:15-cr-20351-SFC-MKM Doc # 74 Filed 07/21/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 176
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of CERBCO, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



September 28, 2004



/s/ Robert W. EriksonRobert W. EriksonPresident




September 28, 2004



/s/ George Wm. EriksonGeorge Wm. EriksonChairman & General Counsel




September 28, 2004



/s/ Robert F. HartmanRobert F. HartmanVice President, Secretary & Treasurer
# C_2011282EN.01003401.xml

| 24.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/34

---

Action brought on 18 July 2011 — Guccio Gucci v OHIM Chang Qing Qing (GUDDY)

(Case T-389/11)

2011/C 282/67

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Guccio Gucci SpA (Firenze, Italy) (represented by: F. Jacobacci, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Chang Qing Qing (Firenze, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 14 April 2011 in case R 143/2010-1 insofar as it rejected the opposition for the remainder of goods in classes 9 and 14; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 14 April 2011 in case R 143/2010-1 insofar as it rejected the opposition for the remainder of goods in classes 9 and 14; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘GUDDY’, for various goods in classes 9, 14, 18 and 25 — Community trade mark application No 6799531

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 121988 of the word mark ‘GUCCI’, for goods in classes 9, 14, 18 and 25

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partially annulled the decision of the Opposition Division and partially dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal failed (i) to examine accurately the documents submitted to reach the appropriate conclusion regarding the higher distinctiveness of the trademark ‘GUCCI’ and as regards the phonetic comparison between the trademarks and subsequently erred in (ii) interpreting and applying Article 8(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.

Pleas in law:

---
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending July 14, 2007

|Filer               | Filing Type             | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------- | ----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------
|ANDOVER BANK, THE   | Premises* Branch        | Andover Bank, Andover, OH to estbablish a branch at 100 South Chestnut Street, Jefferson, OH and requesting to exceed the 150% limit of investment in premises in excess of common stock plus surplus. | Newspaper:07/20/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:          | 07/20/2007             
|Federal Register:   | Not applicable         
|FIFTH THIRD BANCORP | * 18C* 4c8* Branch* 3A3 | Fifth Third Bancorp, Cincinnati, Ohio, to acquire 100 percent of R-G Crown Bank, FSB, Casselberry, Florida, pursuant to section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding Company Act                                | Newspaper:07/08/2007Federal Register:08/06/2007    
|Newspaper:          | 07/08/2007             
|Federal Register:   | 08/06/2007             
|FIFTH THIRD BANK    | * Branch                | Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati, OH to establish a branch at 1200 Brown Street, Suite 120, Dayton, OH.                                                                                                    | Newspaper:07/03/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:          | 07/03/2007             
|Federal Register:   | Not applicable         

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 5.305 Quashing a subpoena.

Any person subpoenaed to appear to produce evidence at a hearing may request that the subpoena be quashed or modified using the procedures in 33 CFR 20.609.

[USCG-1998-3472, 64 FR 28075, May 24, 1999]
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 85 / Thursday, May 3, 2007 / Presidential Documents 25187 

Proclamation 8139 of May 1, 2007 

Older Americans Month, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

During Older Americans Month, we pay tribute to our senior citizens for 

the many ways they strengthen our Nation. Our country is blessed by their 

compassionate acts, the wisdom of their experiences, and the patriotism 

they demonstrate. 

This year’s theme, ‘‘Older Americans: Making Choices for a Healthier Future,’’ 

underscores the importance of making informed decisions regarding lifestyle 

and personal health. The President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports 

encourages seniors to engage in physical activity through a program called 

the President’s Challenge. By recognizing the importance of staying active, 

in conjunction with nutritious eating and proper medical care, older Americans can improve heart health, slow bone loss, and lengthen lives. By 

making an effort to enhance their quality of life, older Americans inspire 

younger generations to appreciate the benefits of a healthy lifestyle. 

My Administration is working to modernize the Medicare system and provide 

better prescription drug coverage and health care so seniors have more 

choices and improved care. This year, I proposed a standard tax deduction 

for those who purchase private health insurance. The Medicare Prescription 

Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 and the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit, Medicare Part D, help seniors receive the medical 

services and the prescription drugs they need at more affordable prices. 

This month, we honor older Americans for demonstrating the spirit of our 

Nation through their positive attitude, strong work ethic, and personal character. America will always be grateful for the legacy of responsibility and 

service they are leaving to future generations. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 2007 as Older 

Americans Month. I commend older Americans for the many contributions 

they make to our Nation. I also commend the Federal, State, local, and 

tribal organizations, service and health care providers, caregivers, and volunteers who dedicate their time and talents to our seniors. I encourage all 

citizens to honor their elders, care for those in need, and reaffirm our 

country’s commitment to older Americans this month and throughout the 

year. 

mmaher on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with $$_JOB

25188 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 85 / Thursday, May 3, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this first day of 

May, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 07–2220 

Filed 5–2–07; 8:54 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


mmaher on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with $$_JOBGWBOLD.EPS
**Exhibit99.2**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CompuMed,Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,Phuong Dang, Controller (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)        TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to CompuMed, Inc. and will be retained by CompuMed, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| /s/  Phuong Dang                                   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                    |
| Phuong Dang                                             |
| Controller (Principal Financial And Accounting Officer) |
| May 12, 2003                                            |

 

----