U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590 March 4, 2016

RE: Jonathan Rutherford Photography, LLC Request for Exemption under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

To The Administrator;

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), Ostrovitz Law Office LLC files this petition for exemption on behalf of Jonathan Rutherford Photography, LLC to allow commercial operation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems under the conditions outlined in the attached petition or modified by the FAA. If we can provide any additional information to assist your understanding or review of this petition, please feel free to contact us at any time.

Respectfully,

Steven L. Ostrovitz

1 550 Cochituate Road Suite 25 Framingham, MA 01701-4683

T : 508.861.7565 F : 508.655.4066 sostrovitz@ostrovitzlaw.com

www.ostrovitzlaw.com STEVEN L. OSTROVITZ Attorney at LawTABLE OF CONTENTS Page GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS..........................................................................................3

SUMMARY.................................................................................................................................3

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF PETITIONER.........................................................4

BACKGROUND.........................................................................................................................4

BASIS FOR PETITION..............................................................................................................4

NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETITIONER...............................................................................6

THE SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF 14 C.F.R. FROM WHICH JONATHAN RUTHERFORD PHOTOGRAPHY, LLC SEEKS EXEMPTION.........................................................................6

THE EXTENT OF RELIEF JONATHAN RUTHERFORD PHOTOGRAPHY, LLC SEEKS AND THE REASON JONATHAN RUTHERFORD PHOTOGRAPHY , LLC SEEKS THE RELIEF......................................................................................................................................10

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING JONATHAN RUTHERFORD PHOTOGRAPHY, LLC REQUEST WOULD BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ...........................................................12

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING THE EXEMPTION TO JONATHAN RUTHERFORD PHOTOGRAPHY , LLC WOULD NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT SAFETY............................14

SUMMARY THAT CAN BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER..........................25

ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, VIEWS, OR ARGUMENTS AVAILABLE TO SUPPORT JONATHAN RUTHERFORD PHOTOGRAPHY, LLC’S REQUEST..................25

CONCLUSION..........................................................................................................................26

APPENDICES.............................................................................................. 26

2GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS

AGL Above Ground Level AOI Area of Interest ATC Air Traffic Control ATO Air Traffic Organization AV Aerial Vehicle CFR Code of Federal Regulations COA Certificate of Authorization FAA Federal Aviation Administration FAR FederalAviation Regulation GCS Ground Control Station GPS Global Positioning System LOL Loss of Link NAS National Airspace System NOTAM Notice to Airmen PIC Pilot In Command Section 333 FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) SO Safety Observer SOP Standard Operating Procedures UA Unmanned Aircraft UAS Unmanned Aircraft System VFR Visual Flight Rules VLOS Visual Line of Site VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions VTOL Vertical Takeoff and Landing

SUMMARY

Jonathan Rutherford Photography, LLC hereafter referred to as Jonathan Rutherford Photography seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (Inspire 1 Pro) pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA). This exemption will permit Jonathan Rutherford Photography to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and photography of commercial and residential real estate, nature and landscapes, outdoor adventure activities such as rafting, kayaking and sailing, for both editorial content along with marketing and advertising over certain areas of the United States.

3INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER

Jonathan Rutherford Photography has for over six years provided their clients with photography, video and multimedia marketing services. Jonathan Rutherford Photography has worked on thousands of productions over the past six years in all types of locations with a perfect client and employee safety record. In the past we have supplied our client’s aerial video and photography using commercial aircraft. The objective of Jonathan Rutherford Photography and our Unmanned Aircraft System (Inspire 1 Pro) aerial operations is to provide a more affordable, high-quality production system for a variety of commercial, public, and residential uses, specifically targeting commercial and residential real estate, nature and landscapes, outdoor adventure activities such as rafting, kayaking and sailing, for both editorial content along with marketing and advertising.

Jonathan Rutherford, principal of Jonathan Rutherford Photography, holds a current Private Pilot Certificate and current third class airman medical certificate and is therefore well versed in the rules and responsibilities associated with proper and safe operation within the NAS. Mr. Rutherford has also safely flown UAS platforms recreationally, including the Inspire 1 Pro, for over two years without incident.

BACKGROUND

Unmanned Aircraft Systems: Inspire 1 Pro, UAS

Jonathan Rutherford Photography seeks an exemption to operate an Inspire 1 Pro system for compensation or hire within the NAS. The Inspire 1 Pro is vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) Unmanned Aircraft (UA) with a Ground Control Station (GCS) utilizing electronic tablet or smart phone systems. The Inspire 1 Pro has a maximum gross weight of approximately 3500g while having a diagonal dimension of 559mm, a maximum speed of approximately 18m/s and a maximum flying height of 120m. The Inspire 1 Pro is equipped with four main rotors; driven by Lithium Polymer battery powered electric motors.

The Inspire 1 Pro that will be operated by Jonathan Rutherford Photography will be registered in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 44103, Registration of Aircraft , as well as 14 C.F.R Part 47, Aircraft Registration , and marked in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 45, Identification and Registration Marking

. BASIS FOR PETITION

Petitioner, Jonathan Rutherford Photography, pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 C.F.R. § 11.61) and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), Section 333, Special Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems , hereby petitions the Administrator to commercially operate the Inspire 1 Pro, UAS in the National Airspace System (NAS), and for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

4In consideration of the speed, weight, size, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned aircraft and its operation, Jonathan Rutherford Photography’s operation of an Inspire 1 Pro UAS meets the conditions of FMRA Section 333 and therefore, will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H.

Accordingly, Jonathan Rutherford Photography requests relief from Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), as these sections set forth requirements for maintenance that only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate.

Jonathan Rutherford Photography submits that the requested relief is proper since an equivalent level of safety will be ensured. Jonathan Rutherford Photography will use experienced personnel or technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and Inspire 1 Pro Manual). Furthermore, Jonathan Rutherford Photography will document and maintain all maintenance records for the Inspire 1 Pro UAS.

Relief from certain requirements of Section 61.113(a) and (b), entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command , is requested by Jonathan Rutherford Photography to the extent necessary to allow a Pilot in Command (PIC) holding a private pilot or higher level certificate, as well as an airman medical certificate, and who has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the Inspire 1 Pro UAS in a manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

Jonathan Rutherford Photography seeks relief from Section 91.7(a), entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness , because the Inspire 1 Pro UAS does not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. As such, Jonathan Rutherford Photography submits that it will ensure that the Inspire 1 Pro UAS is in an airworthy condition prior to every flight by determining that the UAS is in compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and Inspire 1 Pro Manual), and that the aircraft is in a condition safe for flight.

Jonathan Rutherford Photography also seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter Settings , as the Inspire 1 Pro UAS will not have a typical barometric altimeter onboard. However, altitude information of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS will be provided to the PIC via Global Positioning System (GPS) equipment and radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UAS to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight path. This altitude information, combined with Jonathan Rutherford Photography’s operation of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS within visual line of sight, at or below 200 feet AGL (typically 150’ or lower), will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121.

Additionally, Jonathan Rutherford Photography seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.151(b), entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions . Jonathan Rutherford

5Photography submits that safety will not be affected by operation of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC) under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of approximately 15 minutes. Battery power indicators are also able to show how much battery power is left, as well as how much time is needed to return safely back to point of take off.

In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, Jonathan Rutherford Photography provides the following information in support of its petition for exemption:

A. Name And Address Of The Petitioner. The name and address of the Petitioner and point of contact is:

Counsel for Petitioner Jonathan Rutherford Ostrovitz Law Office, LLC Jonathan Rutherford Photography, LLC Atty. Steven L. Ostrovitz 36 Water Street 550 Cochituate Road, Suite 25 Natick, MA 01760 Framingham, MA 01701

617-407-9528 508-861-7565 jon@rutherfoto.com sostrovitz@ostrovitzlaw.com

B. The Specific Sections Of 14 C.F.R. From Which Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks Exemption.

1. Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And (b).

Section 61.113, entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command
, subsections (a) and (b) prescribe the following, in relevant part:

(a) No person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command (PIC) of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire; nor may that person, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft.

(b) A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any business or employment if—

(1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and

(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

62. Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a). Section 91.7, entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness , subsection (a), states the following: (a) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition.

3. Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121.

Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, subsection (a), states the following, in part: (a) Each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruising altitude or flight level of that aircraft, as the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that is set, when operating--

(1) Below 18,000 feet MSL, to--

(i) The current reported altimeter setting of a station along the route and within 100 nautical miles of the aircraft;

(ii) If there is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, the current reported altimeter setting of an appropriate available station; or

(iii) In the case of an aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.

4. Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b).

Section 91.151, entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions , subsection (b), states the following:

(b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 20 minutes.

5. Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks Exemption From The Requirement Of Section 91.405(a).

Section 91.405, entitled Maintenance required , subsection (a), states the following: Each owner or operator of an aircraft—

7(a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter[.]

6. Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.407(a)(1)

Section 91.407, entitled Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration , subsection (a)(1), states the following:

(a) No person may operate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless--

(1) It has been approved for return to service by a person authorized under § 43.7 of this chapter[.]

7. Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.409(a)(1) And 91.409(a)(2).

Section 91.409, entitled Inspections , subsection (a), states the following:

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate an aircraft unless, within the preceding 12 calendar months, it has had --

(1) An annual inspection in accordance with part 43 of this chapter and has been approved for return to service by a person authorized by § 43.7 of this chapter; or

(2) An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in accordance with part 21 of this chapter.

8. Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.417(a) And 91.417(b).

Section 91.417, entitled Maintenance records , subsections (a) and (b), state the following:

(a) Except for work performed in accordance with §§ 91.411 and 91.413, each registered owner or operator shall keep the following records for the periods specified in paragraph (b) of this section:

(1) Records of the maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration and records of the 100-hour, annual, progressive, and other required or approved inspections, as appropriate, for each aircraft (including the

8airframe) and each engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance of an aircraft. The records must include--

(i) A description (or reference to data acceptable to the Administrator) of the work performed; and

(ii) The date of completion of the work performed; and

(iii) The signature, and certificate number of the person approving the aircraft for return to service.

(2) Records containing the following information:

(i) The total time in service of the airframe, each engine, each propeller, and each rotor.

(ii) The current status of life-limited parts of each airframe, engine, propeller, rotor, and appliance.

(iii) The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the aircraft which are required to be overhauled on a specified time basis.

(iv) The current inspection status of the aircraft, including the time since the last inspection required by the inspection program under which the aircraft and its appliances are maintained.

(v) The current status of applicable airworthiness directives (AD) and safety directives including, for each, the method of compliance, the AD or safety directive number and revision date. If the AD or safety directive involves recurring action, the time and date when the next action is required.

(vi) Copies of the forms prescribed by § 43.9(d) of this chapter for each major alteration to the airframe and currently installed engines, rotors, propellers, and appliances.

(b) The owner or operator shall retain the following records for the periods prescribed:

(1) The records specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be retained until the work is repeated or superseded by other work or for 1 year after the work is performed.

(2) The records specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be retained and transferred with the aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold.

9(3) A list of defects furnished to a registered owner or operator under § 43.11 of this chapter shall be retained until the defects are repaired and the aircraft is approved for return to service.

C. The Extent Of Relief Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks And The Reason Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks The Relief.

1. Extent Of Relief Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks And The Reason Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks Relief From Section 61.113(a) And (b).

Relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command , is requested to the extent necessary to allow a PIC holding a private pilot or higher level certificate, as well as a current and valid airman medical certificate, and who has met certain flight-hour and currency requirements, to conduct the proposed UAS flight operations for compensation or hire.

This relief is requested since the limitations set forth in Section 61.113(a) and (b) state that a private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any business or employment if: (1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and (2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

As set forth more fully below, Jonathan Rutherford Photography submits that an equivalent level of safety will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the Inspire 1 Pro UAS unless that PIC has met certain flight-hour and currency requirements, demonstrating that the PIC is able to safely operate the Inspire 1 Pro UAS in a manner consistent with the operations specifications as described in this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers, as well as maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

Furthermore, Jonathan Rutherford Photography submits that all flights of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS, conducted by the PIC pursuant to the grant of this Petition: (1) will be incidental to Jonathan Rutherford Photography’s business; and (2) will not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

2. Extent Of Relief Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks And The Reason Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks Relief From Section 91.7(a).

Relief from Section 91.7(a) entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness , is requested to the extent required to allow Jonathan Rutherford Photography to determine that the Inspire 1 Pro UAS is in airworthy condition prior to every flight by ensuring that the UAS is in compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Jonathan Rutherford Photography Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and Inspire 1 Pro Manual).

10Jonathan Rutherford Photography seeks the requested relief because the Inspire 1 Pro UAS does not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Therefore, Jonathan Rutherford Photography will ensure that the Inspire 1 Pro UAS is in airworthy condition based upon its compliance with the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and Inspire 1 Pro) prior to every flight, and further, determine that the aircraft is in condition for safe flight, as stated in the conditions and limitations below.

3. Extent Of Relief Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks And The Reason Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks Relief From Section 91.121.

Relief from Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, may be required to allow flight operations of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS, which utilizes a barometric pressure sensor, GPS equipment, and a radio communications telemetry data link to downlink altitude information from the UA to the PIC at the ground control station (GCS). Since the FAA requires that any altitude information concerning UAS operations be reported to air traffic control (ATC) in feet above ground level (AGL), Jonathan Rutherford Photography seeks the requested relief because the Inspire 1 Pro UA’s altimeter may be set on the ground to zero feet AGL, rather than the local barometric pressure or field altitude, before each flight.

Considering the limited altitude of the proposed operations, relief from 14 CFR 91.121 is sought to the extent necessary to comply with the applicable conditions and limitations stated below. As more fully set forth herein, an equivalent level of safety will be maintained since the Inspire 1 Pro UAS is equipped with a barometric pressure sensor and GPS equipment, which automatically ensures that a ground level pressure setting will be established prior to each flight, and provides the PIC with altitude information of the UA on the heads-up display of the GCS.

4. Extent Of Relief Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks And The Reason Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks Relief From Section 91.151(b).

Relief from Section 91.151(b) entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, is requested to the extent required to allow flights of the battery powered Inspire 1 Pro UAS during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), for a total duration of 15 minutes. Jonathan Rutherford Photography seeks the requested relief because without an exemption from Section 91.151(b), the flight time duration of the battery powered Inspire 1 Pro 11 UAS will severely constrain the practicality of any aerial video or still photo flight operations that Jonathan Rutherford Photography proposes to conduct pursuant to this Petition.

Significantly, as set forth below, the technical specifications of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS, the Inspire 1 Pro operating documents, and Jonathan Rutherford Photography’s proposed operating limitations, ensure that Jonathan Rutherford Photography will safely operate the battery powered Inspire 1 Pro UAS during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 15 minutes.

115. Extent Of Relief Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks And The Reason Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks Relief From Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b).

Since Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, Jonathan Rutherford Photography requests relief from these Sections because the Inspire 1 Pro UAS does not require an airworthiness certificate. As set forth more fully below, the Inspire 1 Pro UAS meets the conditions of FMRA Section 333 for operation without an airworthiness certificate. Accordingly, Jonathan Rutherford Photography will use qualified staff or trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the UAS operating documents (i.e., the Jonathan Rutherford Photography Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and Inspire 1 Pro Manual). Furthermore, Jonathan Rutherford Photography will document and maintain all maintenance records for the Inspire 1 Pro UAS.

D. The Reasons Why Granting Jonathan Rutherford Photography Request Would Be In The Public Interest; That Is, How It Would Benefit The Public As A Whole. Granting the present Petition will further the public interest by allowing Jonathan Rutherford Photography to safely, efficiently, and economically perform aerial video and photography of construction sites, real estate, events and civic landscape over certain areas of the United States. Additionally, use of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS will decrease congestion of the NAS, reduce pollution, and provide significant benefits to the economy. Notably, the benefits of Jonathan Rutherford Photography’s proposed operation of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS will be realized without implicating any privacy issues.

1. The Public Will Benefit From Decreased Congestion Of The NAS.

The Inspire 1 Pro UAS is battery powered and serves as a safe, efficient, and economical alternative to the manned aircraft traditionally utilized to obtain aerial imagery. By reducing the amount of manned aircraft needed to perform aerial acquisitions, an exemption allowing the use of an Inspire 1 Pro UAS would reduce the amount of manned aircraft in the NAS, reduce noise and air pollution, as well as increase the safety of life and property in the air and on the ground.

Furthermore, by reducing the number of manned aircraft operating in the NAS, congestion around airports caused by arriving and departing aircraft will be reduced. The Inspire 1 Pro UAS does not require an airport to takeoff or land. Likewise, a reduction of manned aircraft conducting aerial video and photography missions would result in fewer aircraft that must be handled by air traffic control during the ground, takeoff, departure, arrival, and landing phases of flight operations.

122. The Public Will Benefit From The Safety And Efficiency Of The Inspire 1 Pro UAS.

Conducting aerial acquisitions with the Inspire 1 Pro UAS, instead of manned aircraft, will greatly benefit the public by drastically reducing the levels of air and noise pollution generated during traditional aerial video and still photography flight operations. By using battery power and electric motors, the Inspire 1 Pro UAS produces no air pollution, and is the most viable environmentally conscious alternative to the cabin class, six cylinder internal combustion engine aircraft that are typically utilized for aerial video and photography, while burning approximately 20-30 gallons per hour of leaded aviation fuel. The Inspire 1 Pro UAS, while reducing the carbon footprint of aerial acquisitions, also eliminates noise pollution, as the UAS is propelled by battery powered electric motors, rather than an internal combustion engine.

By using the Inspire 1 Pro UAS to perform aerial acquisitions, the substantial risk to life and property in the air and on the ground which is usually associated with traditional manned aircraft flight operations, will be substantially reduced or completely eliminated. Aside from the lack of flight crew members located onboard the aircraft, the Inspire 1 Pro UAS (weighing approximately 3500g at its maximum gross weight with a diagonal dimension of 559mm, and with no fuel on board), has less physical potential for collateral damage to life and property on the ground, and in the air, compared to the manned aircraft that typically conduct similar operations (weighing approximately 6,000 pounds with a wingspan of approximately 42 feet, a length of 34 feet, and a fuel capacity of 180 gallons).

3. Performing Aerial Video and Photography Operations With The Inspire 1 Pro UAS Will Benefit The Economy.

In addition to being safe and efficient, the Inspire 1 Pro UAS is also an economical alternative to using manned aircraft to conduct similar aerial operations. As such, operation of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS will allow United States based companies, like Jonathan Rutherford Photography, to remain competitive and contribute to the growth of the U.S. economy. Specifically, with the rising cost of aviation fuel and the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) regulatory actions phasing out leaded aviation fuels, U.S. owned and operated companies must adopt new and alternative technology in order to remain competitive. Operating the battery powered Inspire 1 Pro UAS is one such technology that not only allows companies greater operational flexibility compared to manned aircraft, but provides such flexibility without the high operational cost of a traditional manned aircraft.

By operating the Inspire 1 Pro UAS, companies such as Jonathan Rutherford Photography, can remain competitive and profitable, and therefore, provide greater job stability to employees and contractors, which will ultimately contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Improved financial performance of U.S. companies, through commercial use of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS, provides a stable workforce that increases consumer spending; improves local, state, and federal tax revenues; and allows companies to invest in research and development in order to remain competitive both in the United States and abroad.

134. There Are No Privacy Issues.

Similar to the manned aerial acquisition flight operations that have been conducted for decades, Jonathan Rutherford Photography’s proposed operation of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS will not implicate any privacy issues. Specifically, the Inspire 1 Pro UAS will be operated only in compliance with operating documents (i.e., Jonathan Rutherford Photography Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and Inspire 1 Pro Manual) which requires property owner involvement as well as local law enforcement notification, and in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations, including the minimum altitude requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 91.119.

E. The Reasons Why Granting The Exemption Would Not Adversely Affect Safety, Or How The Exemption Would Provide A Level Of Safety At Least Equal To That Provided By The Rule From Which Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks Exemption.

1. Reasons Why The Inspire 1 Pro UAS Meets The Conditions Of The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333.

In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned aircraft and its operation, Jonathan Rutherford Photography’s operation of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS meets the conditions of FMRA Section 333, and will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H.

Section 333 provides authority for a UAS to operate without airworthiness certification and sets forth requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security. Specifically, FMRA Section 333 states the following, in part:

(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other requirement of this subtitle, and not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall determine if certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system before completion of the plan and rulemaking required by section 332 of this Act or the guidance required by section 334 of this Act. (b) Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.--In making the determination under subsection (a), the Secretary shall determine, at a minimum--

(1) which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their size, weight, speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and populated areas, and operation within visual line of sight do not create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public or pose a threat to national security; and

14(2) whether a certificate of waiver, certificate of authorization, or airworthiness certification under section 44704 of title 49, United States Code, is required for the operation of unmanned aircraft systems identified under paragraph (1).

(c) Requirements for Safe Operation.--If the Secretary determines under this section that certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.

In seeking this exemption, Jonathan Rutherford Photography submits that the Inspire 1 Pro UAS can operate safely in the NAS pursuant to FMRA Section 333, as demonstrated by: (a) the characteristics of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS; (b) the pilot certification requirement; and (c) the specific operating limitations.

a. The Specifications Of The Inspire 1 Pro UAS Demonstrate Its Safe Characteristics.

The Inspire 1 Pro UAS does not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security considering its size, weight, speed, and operational capability. Additionally the Inspire 1 Pro has unique safety features including “Return To Home” that allows the PIC to recover from unexpected events affecting the flight and warning modes that notifies PIC via messages on the controller of the proximity of Warning Zones, Restricted Areas, and No-fly Zones. In the case of No-fly Zones the Inspire 1 Pro has a mode that prevents the operation of the UAS. These features differentiates the Inspire 1 Pro as a uniquely safe and complete UAS and is why Jonathan Rutherford Photography chose this specific UAS for its use.

i. Technical Specifications Of The Inspire 1 Pro UAS. The technical specifications of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS are set forth by the Inspire 1 Pro User Manual, attached and linked hereto as Appendix A.

ii. The Inspire 1 Pro UAS Global Positioning Modes Enable The UAS To Remain Within A Defined Operational Area.

The Inspire 1 Pro UAS may be operated in both manual and global positioning flight modes. A complete description of the flight and navigational modes of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS begins at page 50 of the Inspire 1 Pro User Manual attached and linked hereto as Appendix A.

iii. The Inspire 1 Pro UAS Is Designed For Automatic Return To Home Point Or Hover In The Event Of Loss Of The Control Link Or Navigation.

When the Control Link is lost, in flight, for 3 seconds or more, the Inspire 1 Pro will enter Failsafe Return to Home (RTH) mode. If, after 3 seconds, the Inspire 1 Pro UAS does not reacquire control link data from the GCS, the UAS will assume that the Control

15Link is lost and will return to the home position (i.e., failsafe mode) via GPS, and will descend to the takeoff position and shutdown.

Additionally, if for any reason the PIC feels the need to stop the motion of the UAS in flight, the RTH button on the controller will immediately stop or slow the UAS and cause it to return to the Home Point or other location as the PIC may direct.

Additionally, the Inspire 1 Pro has a Low Battery Return to Home mode, triggered when the flight battery is depleted to the point that may affect safe return of the aircraft. If no action is taken to return to the Home Point after a ten second countdown, the UAS automatically will return to the Home Point.

A complete description of the Failsafe Functions of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS are set forth in the Inspire 1 Pro Manual beginning at Page 15, linked and attached hereto as Appendix A.

iv. The Inspire 1 Pro GCS And Its Operation. A complete description of the operation and specifications of the Inspire 1 Pro GCS and flight control software is provided on the Inspire 1 Pro Manual, linked and attached hereto as Appendix A.

b. Flight Operations Of Inspire 1 Pro UAS Is Limited To The Line Of Sight Of A Pilot in Command.

Jonathan Rutherford Photography image and video production staff will be the only persons to act as a pilot in command (PIC) of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS.

c. Flights Of Inspire 1 Pro UAS Will Be Conducted Pursuant To Specific Operating Limitations.

In seeking this exemption, Jonathan Rutherford Photography proposes to commercially operate the Inspire 1 Pro UAS for the special purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of United States, pursuant to the following specific operating limitations.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption will be limited to the following aircraft described in the operating documents, rotorcraft UAS weighing 3500g maximum gross weight: Inspire 1 Pro Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this grant.

2. UAS operations under this exemption will be limited to conducting operations for the purpose of aerial video and photography.

3. The UAS may not be flown at an indicated airspeed exceeding 20 knots.

164. The UAS must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level (AGL), as indicated by the procedures specified in the operating documents unless a special request is made and approved by ATC. All altitudes reported to ATC must be in feet AGL.

5. The UAS must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate.

6. The use of first person view (FPV) by the PIC is not permitted.

7. All operations must utilize a safety observer (SO). The SO may be used to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The SO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times. Electronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the SO can perform the functions prescribed in the operating documents.

8. The SO must not perform any other duties beyond assisting the PIC with seeing and avoiding other air traffic and other ground based obstacles/obstructions and is not permitted to operate the camera or other instruments.

9. The operating documents and the grant of exemption must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of exemption take precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised documents to the Administrator upon request. The operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension or amendment to the grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted the exemption, then the operator must petition for amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS-80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents.

10. Prior to each flight the PIC must inspect the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition for safe flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. The Ground Control

17Station must be included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and alterations must be properly documented in the aircraft records.

11. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo a functional test flight. The PIC who conducts the functional test flight must make an entry in the aircraft records.

12. The pre-flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g. inoperable components, items, or equipment, not already covered in the relevant sections of the operating documents.

13. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s aircraft/component, maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements.

14. The operator must carry out its maintenance, inspections, and record keeping requirements, in accordance with the operating documents. Maintenance, inspection, alterations, and status of replacement/overhaul component parts must be noted in the aircraft records, including total time in service, description of work accomplished, and the signature of the authorized person returning the UAS to service.

15. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer Safety Bulletins.

16. The authorized person must make an entry in the aircraft record of the corrective action taken against discrepancies discovered between inspections.

17. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC meets the operator’s qualification criteria and demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours must be logged in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs are permitted under the terms of the exemption. However, training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During training, proficiency, and experience-building flights, all persons not essential for flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 91.119.

18. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 C.F.R. § 1.1. All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). If flight at night is required, a special request will be made at the FAA office closest to proposed area of operations. Flights under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized.

1819. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point as denoted on a current FAA-published aeronautical chart unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is obtained, and the operation is conducted in accordance with a NOTAM as required by the operator’s COA. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available to the Administrator upon request.

20. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

21. If the UA loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it must return to a pre- determined location within the planned operating area and land or be recovered in accordance with the operating documents.

22. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies in accordance with the operating documents.

23. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough power to fly at normal cruising speed to the intended landing point and land the UA with 25% battery power remaining.

24. The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) issued Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under the grant of exemption. This COA will also require the operator to request a Notice to Airman (NOTAM) not more than 72 hours in advance, but not less than 48 hours prior to the operation. All operations shall be conducted in accordance with airspace requirements in the ATO issued COA including class of airspace, altitude level and potential transponder requirements.

25. All aircraft operated in accordance with the exemption must be identified by serial number, registered in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 47, and have identification (N- Number) markings in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable.

26. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for operation and control of the UA must comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or other appropriate government oversight agency requirements.

27. The documents required fewer than 14 C.F.R. 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the UAS is operating. These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

1928. The UA must remain clear and yield the right of way to all manned aviation operations and activities at all times.

29. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

30. Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating persons (persons other than the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons), vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately and/or;

b. The aircraft is operated near vessels, vehicles or structures where the owner/controller of such vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not present an undue hazard, and; c. Operations nearer to the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons do not present an undue hazard to those persons per § 91.119(a).

31. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with permission from the land owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission from land owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight to be conducted.

32. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS-80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov

. 2. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And (b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

Jonathan Rutherford Photography submits that the equivalent level of safety established by Section 61.113(a) and (b) will be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the Inspire 1 Pro UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the Inspire 1 Pro UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

20Considering Jonathan Rutherford Photography’s proposed area of operations, and the operating limitations set forth-above; the parallel nature of private pilot aeronautical knowledge requirements to those of commercial pilot requirements (See Exemption No. 11062); and the airmanship skills necessary to safely operate the Inspire 1 Pro UAS, Jonathan Rutherford Photography submits that the additional manned airmanship experience of a commercially certificated pilot would not correlate to the airmanship skills necessary for Jonathan Rutherford Photography’s specific proposed flight operations.

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

Jonathan Rutherford Photography will not allow any PIC to operate the Inspire 1 Pro UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour requirements or the Inspire 1 Pro UAS training and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the Inspire 1 Pro UAS in a manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

Specifically, the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot (with a minimum of 5 hours of those hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations under the exemption). In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes).

As in Exemption Nos. 11062, 11138, and 11153, prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations will ensure an equivalent level of safety during Jonathan Rutherford Photography’s proposed operations. The Administrator has held that prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would ensure safe operations, stating as follows:

In Exemption No. 11062, the FAA required that prior to conducting operations for the purpose of motion picture filming (or similar operations), the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 CFR 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot including at least 10 hours logged as a UAS pilot with a multi-rotor UAS. Prior to operations under Exemption No. 11062, the PIC must also have accumulated and logged a minimum of 5 hours as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations under the exemption. For clarification, the FAA considers these minimum hour requirements to be inclusive rather than additive; i.e. 5 hours make and model time may be included in the 10 hours of multi-rotor time and the 10 hours may be included in the total 25 hours of UAS rotorcraft time. In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes). The FAA finds that at a minimum, the flight-hour

21requirements in Exemption No. 11062 are appropriate to practice and build proficiency in the skills necessary to safely conduct the petitioner’s proposed operations. The FAA also finds that prior documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would satisfy this requirement. Training, proficiency, and experience-building flights can also be conducted under the grant of exemption to accomplish the required flight time. During training, proficiency, and experience-building flights the PIC is required to operate the UA with appropriate distances in accordance with 14 C.F.R 91.119.* * Exemption No. 11138 at page 15

. Accordingly, Jonathan Rutherford Photography will ensure safe operations by not allowing any PIC to operate the Inspire 1 Pro UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the Inspire 1 Pro UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

3. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.7(a) will be maintained because prior to every flight, Jonathan Rutherford Photography will ensure that the Inspire 1 Pro UAS is in an airworthy condition based upon the UAS’s compliance with its operating documents and as stated in the conditions and limitations herein.

Additionally, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.7(a) specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

4. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121 Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.121 will be maintained because the altitude information of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS will be provided to the PIC via GPS equipment and a radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UAS to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight path and altitude. This altitude information, combined with Jonathan Rutherford Photography’s operation of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS within visual line of sight, at or below 400 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. The altitude information will be generated by GPS equipment installed onboard the aircraft. Prior to each flight, a zero altitude initiation point is automatically established by the UAS at ground level.

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.121 specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063,

2211064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

5. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

A grant of this exemption would ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b) as a result of (1) the technical specifications of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS; (2) the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and (3) the location of the proposed flight operations. Accordingly, Jonathan Rutherford Photography will ensure that it will safely operate the battery powered Inspire 1 Pro UAS during daylight hours in VFR conditions, with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 15 minutes.

Here, as in Exemption No. 11109, the technical specifications of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS; the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and the location of the proposed operations, will ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b). Furthermore, safety will be ensured as the Inspire 1 Pro UAS provides audible and visual warnings to the PIC at the GCS when the UAS experiences low battery voltage. At the critically low battery level, the Inspire 1 Pro UAS will slowly descend and land automatically if no other action is taken.

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Section 91.151 establish that safety is not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are considered. Relief has been granted for manned aircraft to operate at less than the minimums prescribed in Section 91.151, including Exemption Nos. 2689, 5745, and 10650. Moreover, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.151 specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 8811, 10808, 10673, 11042, 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

6. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a) (1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

In seeking this exemption, Jonathan Rutherford Photography submits that the equivalent level of safety with regard to the regulatory maintenance and alteration requirements established by Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) will be met because Jonathan Rutherford Photography will use qualified staff and/or trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., Jonathan Rutherford Photography Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and Inspire 1 Pro Instruction Manual). Furthermore, Jonathan Rutherford Photography will document and maintain all maintenance records for the Inspire 1 Pro UAS.

23Since the Inspire 1 Pro UAS will be inspected as prescribed by the operating documents, Jonathan Rutherford Photography will maintain the equivalent level of safety established by Sections 91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1), and 91.409(a)(2). A copy of the Inspire 1 Pro User Manual is attached and linked hereto as Appendix A.

Likewise, the exemption sought will not adversely affect safety because Jonathan Rutherford Photography will use qualified staff and/or trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed by the operating documents.

Furthermore, the exemption sought would maintain an equivalent level of safety established by Sections 91.407, 91.417(a) and 91.417(b), because all maintenance of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS will be performed by qualified staff and/or trained technicians. Maintenance will be documented and maintained utilizing the monthly maintenance log.

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a) (1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) establish that safety is not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are considered.

In consideration of Jonathan Rutherford Photography’s proposed operating limitations, the operating documents, and the technical aspects of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS, Jonathan Rutherford Photography submits that safety will not be adversely affected by granting exemption from 14 C.F.R. Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1) and (a)(2), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b). The FAA has previously granted relief specific to UAS in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

7. The FAA May Prescribe Any Other Conditions For Safe Operation.

In accordance with Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16 entitled Special Conditions, Jonathan Rutherford Photography requests that the FAA prescribe special conditions for the intended operation of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS, which contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7 (a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). Such special conditions will permit safe operation of the UAS for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States for compensation or hire. FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification in accordance with any requirements that must be established for the safe operation of the UAS in the NAS.

24Likewise, the Administrator may prescribe special conditions pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, for operation of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS, since the airworthiness regulations of 14 C.F.R. Part 21 do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards, due to the novel or unusual design features of the aircraft. Section 21.16, entitled Special Conditions, states the following:

If the FAA finds that the airworthiness regulations of this subchapter do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for an aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller because of a novel or unusual design feature of the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller, he prescribes special conditions and amendments thereto for the product. The special conditions are issued in accordance with Part 11 of this chapter and contain such safety standards for the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller as the FAA finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established in the regulations.

See 14 C.F.R. § 21.16.

Therefore, in accordance with FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, the FAA may prescribe special conditions for Jonathan Rutherford Photography’s intended operation of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS, which contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a) (2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

• A Summary That Can Be Published In The Federal Register, stating: The Rules From Which Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks Exemption:

Jonathan Rutherford Photography seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a)&(b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

A Brief Description Of The Nature Of The Exemption Jonathan Rutherford Photography Seeks:

This exemption will permit Jonathan Rutherford Photography to commercially operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States.

• Any Additional Information, Views, Or Arguments Available To Support Jonathan Rutherford Photography’s Request.

This Petition is made pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to determine if certain UAS may operate safely in the NAS. As such, Jonathan Rutherford Photography’s request for

25exemption may be granted pursuant to the authority of FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, as set forth above.

FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and further, provides the authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification. As discussed in detail above, Jonathan Rutherford Photography will operate the Inspire 1 Pro UAS safely in the NAS, without creating a hazard to users of the NAS, or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security.

CONCLUSION

As set forth herein, Jonathan Rutherford Photography seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.61 and Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), which will permit safe operation of the Inspire 1 Pro UAS commercially, without an airworthiness certificate, for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States. By granting this Petition, the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the Congressional mandate of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, while also advancing the interests of the public, by allowing Jonathan Rutherford Photography to safely, efficiently, and economically operate the Inspire 1 Pro UAS commercially within the NAS.

WHEREFORE , in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, Jonathan Rutherford Photography respectfully requests that the Administrator grant this Petition for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), and permit Jonathan Rutherford Photography to operate the Inspire 1 Pro UAS commercially for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States.

Respectfully submitted, Dated: March 4, 2016

Petitioner: Counsel for Petitioner: Jonathan Rutherford Ostrovitz Law Office, LLC Jonathan Rutherford Photography, LLC Atty. Steven L. Ostrovitz 36 Water Street 550 Cochituate Road, Suite 25 Natick, MA 01760 Framingham, MA 01701 617-407-9528 jon@rutherfoto.com 508-861-7565 sostrovitz@ostrovitzlaw.com

APPENDIX:

A – Link to Inspire 1 Pro Manual:

http://dl.djicdn.com/downloads/inspire_1_pro/en/Inspire_1_Pro_User_Manual_en_v1.0_1201.pdf

26