alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending October 25, 2008

|Filer                                  | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                             
|-------------------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|CITIZENS BANCSHARES OF WOODVILLE, INC. | CIC           | Change in control notice by Norlin G. Boyum, Minneapolis, Minnesota, John B. Boyum, Arlington, Virginia, and Stephanie J. Boyum, New York, New York, individually and as part of a group acting in concert, to acquire 25 percent or more of the shares of Citizens Bancshares of Woodville, Inc., Hudson, Wisconsin, and thereby indirectly acquire control of Citizens State Bank, Hudson, Wisconsin. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:11/14/2008
|Newspaper:                             | Not available
|Federal Register:                      | 11/14/2008   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Susan A. Rogers, *Appellant, v.*The Village of Sandy Hill and James Merrihew, *as Collector of said Village, Respondents*.

Judgment reversed, new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1520. JENNIFER SHURLEY v. THE STATE.

In 2011, Jennifer Shurley was sentenced as a first offender to five years on

probation for burglary. In 2015, the trial court revoked her probation for the

commission of a new felony, adjudicated her guilty on the 2011 charges, and resentenced her. Shurley filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

Because the underlying subject matter of Shurley’s appeal is the revocation of

her first offender probation, she was required to file an application for discretionary

appeal in order to obtain review in this Court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (5); Jones v.

State, 322 Ga. App. 269 n. 2 (745 SE2d 1) (2013); Zamora v. State, 226 Ga. App. 105

(485 SE2d 214) (1997). Shurley’s failure to file an application for discretionary

appeal deprives us of jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby

DISMISSED. See White v. State, 233 Ga. App. 873 (505 SE2d 228) (1998).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

04/30/2015

April 30, 2015
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending January 3, 2009

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
EXHIBIT 23.3

                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                  CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



Novo Networks, Inc.
Dallas, Texas

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-43032) of our report
dated September 1, 2000, except for Note 1(b), as to which the
date is September 25,2001, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of Novo Networks, Inc. formerly eVentures Group, Inc.
(the "Company")appearing in the Company's Form 10-K for the year
ended June 30, 2000.  We also consent to the reference to us
under the caption "Experts" in the Re-offer Prospectus.


/s/  BDO Seidman LLP

New York, New York
September 25,2002
#### John Collins, *Appellant, v.*Sarah J. Collins and others, *Respon*dents.

Decree affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
* Pursuant to 5T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5T H C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40448 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARVIN RAY EASTER, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:96-CR-33-1

- - - - - - - - - - December 24, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Counsel for Marvin Ray Easter has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), alleging that there are no meritorious issues for appeal. Easter filed a pro se brief raising additional issues. Our independent review of the briefs and record discloses no issue of arguable merit. Therefore, the motion of counsel to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
§ 56.01-1 Scope (replaces 100.1). ( a ) This part contains requirements for the various ships' and barges' piping systems and appurtenances.
( b ) The respective piping systems installed on ships and barges must have the necessary pumps, valves, regulation valves, safety valves, relief valves, flanges, fittings, pressure gages, liquid level indicators, thermometers, etc., for safe and efficient operation of the vessel.
( c ) Piping for industrial systems on mobile offshore drilling units need not fully comply with the requirements of this part but must meet subpart 58.60 of this subchapter.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18843, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGD 73-251, 43 FR 56799, Dec. 4, 1978]
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1499

AN ACT

To improve the criminal law relating to fraud

against consumers.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1499

AN ACT

To improve the criminal law relating to fraud against

consumers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Telemarketing Fraud

5 Punishment and Prevention Act of 1996’’.
2

•HR 1499 EH

1 SEC. 2. FORFEITURE OF FRAUD PROCEEDS.

2 Section 982(a) of title 18, United States Code, is

3 amended by adding at the end the following:

4 ‘‘(6) The Court, in sentencing a defendant for

5 an offense under section 2326, shall order that the

6 defendant forfeit to the United States any real or

7 personal property—

8 ‘‘(A) used or intended to be used to com9 mit or to promote the commission of such of10 fense, if the court in its discretion so deter11 mines, taking into consideration the nature,

12 scope, and proportionality of the use of the

13 property in the offense; and

14 ‘‘(B) constituting, derived from, or trace15 able to the gross receipts that the defendant ob16 tained directly or indirectly as a result of the

17 offense,.’’.

18 SEC. 3. SENTENCING GUIDELINES CHANGES.

19 Pursuant to its authority under section 994(p) of title

20 28, United States Code, the United States Sentencing

21 Commission shall review and amend the sentencing guide22 lines to provide a sentencing enhancement for any offense

23 listed in section 2326 of title 18, United States Code—

24 (1) by at least 4 levels if the circumstances au25 thorizing an additional term of imprisonment under

26 section 2326(1) are present; and
3

•HR 1499 EH

1 (2) by at least 8 levels if the circumstances au2 thorizing an additional term of imprisonment under

3 section 2326(2) are present.

4 SEC. 4. INCREASED PUNISHMENT FOR USE OF FOREIGN

5 LOCATION TO EVADE PROSECUTION.

6 Pursuant to its authority under section 994(p) of title

7 28, United States Code, the United States Sentencing

8 Commission shall amend the sentencing guidelines to in9 crease the offense level for any fraud offense by at least

10 2 levels if the defendant conducted activities to further

11 the fraud from a foreign country.

12 SEC. 5. CLARIFICATION OF ENHANCEMENT OF PENALTIES.

13 Section 2327(a) of title 18, United States Code, is

14 amended by striking ‘‘under this chapter’’ and inserting

15 ‘‘for which an enhanced penalty is provided under section

16 2326 of this title’’.
4

•HR 1499 EH

1 SEC. 6. ADDITION OF CONSPIRACY OFFENSES TO SECTION

2 2326 ENHANCEMENT.

3 Section 2326 of title 18, United States Code, is

4 amended by inserting ‘‘, or a conspiracy to commit such

5 an offense,’’ after ‘‘or 1344’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 25,

1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending August 2, 2008

|Filer                                   | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                              
|--------------------------------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS TRUST COMPANY | * Branch       | Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company, Buffalo, New York to establish a branch at 1829 Reisterstown Road, Pikesville, Baltimore County, Maryland. | Newspaper:08/08/2008Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                              | 08/08/2008    
|Federal Register:                       | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with Amendment Number 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Victory Capital Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March
31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), the undersigned Jon Fullenkamp, Chief Financial Officer of
Victory Capital Holdings Corporation certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:
June 6, 2005
 
 /s/Jon
Fullenkamp
 Jon
Fullenkamp
 Chief
Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                            SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, constitutes and
appoints JOSEPH HINES and CLARENCE J. BAUDHUIN, and each of them, his true and
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
July 31, 1996, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Zila,
Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with any and all amendments to such Form
10-K, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting to
such attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to
do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done
in and about the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as he might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or each of them, may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

         DATED:     October 8   , 1996



                                                       /s/ CARL SCHROEDER
                                                       ------------------------
                                                       CARL SCHROEDER

STATE OF          ARIZONA           )
                                    )  ss.
County of         Maricopa          )


         On this 8th day of October , 1996, before me, the undersigned Notary
Public, personally appeared, CARL SCHROEDER, known to me to be the person whose
name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he executed
the same for the purposes therein contained.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.


                                                       /s/ JANICE BACKUS
                                                       ------------------------
                                                       Notary Public

My commission expires:


    October 23, 1997


                                   EXHIBIT 24F
§ 54.15-1 General (modifies UG-125 through UG-137). ( a ) All pressure vessels must be provided with protective devices as indicated in UG-125 through UG-136 Section VIII of the ASME BPVC (incorporated by reference; see § 54.01-1) except as noted otherwise in this subpart.
( b ) The markings must be in accordance with this chapter for devices covered by § 54.15-10.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18828, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by CGD 88-032, 56 FR 35822, July 29, 1991; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65170, Oct. 31, 2008]
#### § 45.143 Hull openings above freeboard deck.

Closures for openings above the freeboard deck must be as strong as the structure to which they are attached and must be weathertight.
#### Joseph Iseman *v.*Jeremiah Myer *et al*.

Motion granted in all respects.
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Kirkman, Appellee.

[Cite as *State v. Kirkman*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 16.]

(No. 98-687

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided November 25, 1998.)

*Jim Slagle,*Marion County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the trial court’s finding that Donald Kirkman is a sexual predator is reinstated on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
§ 39.4001 General requirements for vapor balancing—TB/ALL. ( a ) Vessels using vapor balancing while conducting a vessel-to-vessel transfer operation, directly or through a shore loop, must meet the requirements of this subpart in addition to the requirements of 46 CFR part 39, subparts 39.1000, 39.2000, and 39.3000. Arrangements other than vapor balancing used to control vapor emissions during a vessel-to-vessel transfer operation must receive approval from the Commandant.
( b ) A vapor balancing operation must receive approval from the Commandant to use a compressor or blower to assist vapor transfer.
( c ) Vapor balancing is prohibited when the cargo tanks on a vessel discharging cargo are inerted and the cargo tanks on a vessel receiving cargo are not inerted.
( d ) A vessel that intends to collect vapors (during a vessel-to-vessel transfer operation) from cargoes not previously approved must receive specific approval from the Commandant before beginning transfer operations.
§ 42.30-10 Southern Winter Seasonal Zone. ( a ) The northern boundary of the Southern Winter Seasonal Zone is the rhumb line from the east coast of the American continent at Cape Tres Puntas to the point latitude 34° S., longitude 50° W.; thence the parallel of latitude 34° S. to longitude 17° E.; thence the rhumb line to the point latitude 35°10′ S., longitude 20° E.; thence the rhumb line to the point latitude 34° S. longitude 28° E.; thence along the rhumb line to the point latitude 35°30′ S., longitude 118° E.; thence the rhumb line to Cape Grim on the northwest coast of Tasmania; thence along the north and east coasts of Tasmania to the southernmost point of Bruny Island; thence the rhumb line to Black Rock Point on Stewart Island; thence the rhumb line to the point latitude 47° S., longitude 170° E.; thence along the rhumb line to the point latitude 33° S., longitude 170° W.; and thence the parallel of latitude 33° S. to the west coast of the American continent. ( 1 ) Valparaiso is to be considered as being on the boundary line of the Summer and the Winter Seasonal Zones.
( 2 ) Seasonal periods:
Winter: April 16 to October 15. Summer: October 16 to April 15.
[CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10068, July 12, 1968]
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 3, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00222

- CV

ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND PROPERTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant

v.

Alicia LIMA, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17

- 1880

- CV

- A Honorable Jessica Crawford, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On April 11, 2019, appellant filed an u nopposed m otion for temporary relief and stay pending resolution of settlement negotiations . On April 12, 2019, this court granted the motion
and ordered appellant file a motion requesting an appropriate disposition of this appeal by June 11, 2019

. See Caballero v. Heart of Texas Pizza, L.L.C. , 70 S.W.3d 180, 18 1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2001, no pet.); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1, 43.2. As of the date of this order, appellant has not
filed such a motion.

Accordingly, appellant is ORDERED to file within ten (10) days of the date of this order either: (a) a motion requesting an appropriate disposition of this appeal ; or (b) a written response stating appellant desires to prosecute this appeal. If appellant fails to respond to this order, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution and costs of this appeal will be assessed against appellant

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3 (b), (c)

All appellate deadlines remain suspended pendin g further order of this court.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of July, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
#### In the Matter of the New York, West Shore and Buffalo Railway Company *v.*William Lounsbury and others.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Mem. by

Learned, P. J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

      ( print page 28476)    

# Time and Date: 

11 a.m., Friday, June 29, 2007.

# Place: 

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status: 

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered: 

Surveillance Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information: 

Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan, 

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-2532 Filed 5-17-07; 11:21 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M