Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 86 / Friday, May 4, 2007 / Notices 25261 

Administration, Room B–099, within 30 

days of the date of publication of this 

notice. Requests should contain: (1) the 

party’s name, address and telephone 

number; (2) the number of participants; 

and, (3) a list of issues to be discussed. 

See 19 CFR 351.310(c). Issues raised in 

the hearing will be limited to those 

raised in the respective case briefs. The 

Department will issue the final results 

of the administrative and new shipper 

reviews, including the results of its 

analysis of issues raised in any written 

briefs, not later than 120 days after the 

date of publication of this notice, 

pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act. 

Assessment 

Upon completion of the 

administrative and new shipper 

reviews, the Department shall 

determine, and CBP shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212. The Department will issue 

appropriate appraisement instructions 

for the companies subject to these 

reviews directly to CBP 15 days after the 

date of publication of the final results of 

this review. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), for 

all sales made by Colakoglu, Habas, 

Kaptan, and Kroman, as well as for 

certain sales made by Ekinciler, because 

we have the reported entered value of 

the U.S. sales, we have calculated 

importer–specific assessment rates 

based on the ratio of the total amount of 

antidumping duties calculated for the 

examined sales to the total entered 

value of those sales. 

Regarding all of Diler’s and certain of 

Ekinciler’s sales, we note that these 

companies did not report the entered 

value for the U.S. sales in question. 

Accordingly, we have calculated 

importer–specific assessment rates for 

the merchandise in question by 

aggregating the dumping margins 

calculated for all U.S. sales to each 

importer and dividing this amount by 

the total quantity of those sales. To 

determine whether the duty assessment 

rates were de minimis, in accordance 

with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(2), we calculated importer– 

specific ad valorem ratios based on the 

estimated entered value. 

We will instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by these reviews if any 

importer–specific assessment rate 

calculated in the final results of these 

reviews is above de minimis (i.e., at or 

above 0.50 percent). Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate without regard to antidumping 

duties any entries for which the 

assessment rate is de minimis (i.e., less 

than 0.50 percent). See 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1). 

We are preliminarily revoking the 

order with respect to Colakoglu’s and 

Diler’s exports of subject merchandise. 

If these revocations become final, we 

will instruct CBP to terminate the 

suspension of liquidation for exports of 

such merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after April 1, 2006, 

and to refund all cash deposits 

collected. 

The final results of these reviews shall 

be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the final results 

of these reviews and for future deposits 

of estimated duties, where applicable. 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003 (68 FR 23954). This 

clarification will apply to entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

produced by companies included in 

these preliminary results of review for 

which the reviewed companies did not 

know their merchandise was destined 

for the United States. In such instances, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the All–Others 

rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. For a full discussion of 

this clarification, see Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

the administrative and new shipper 

reviews, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash 

deposit rate for each specific company 

listed above will be that established in 

the final results of these reviews, except 

if the rate is less than 0.50 percent, and 

therefore, de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in 

which case the cash deposit rate will be 

zero; (2) for previously reviewed or 

investigated companies not 

participating in these reviews, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company–specific rate published for the 

most recent period; (3) if the exporter is 

not a firm covered in these reviews or 

the original less–than-fair–value (LTFV) 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recent period 

for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and 4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 16.06 

percent, the All–Others rate established 

in the LTFV investigation. These 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results of review in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1), 751(a)(2)(B)(iv), and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, as well as 19 CFR 

351.214(i), 351.221(b)(4), and 

351.222(f)(2)(iv). 

Dated: April 30, 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–8583 Filed 5–3–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Implementation of the Findings of the 

WTO Panel in US—Zeroing (EC): 

Notice of Determinations Under 

Section 129 of the Uruguay Round 

Agreements Act and Revocations and 

Partial Revocations of Certain 

Antidumping Duty Orders 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On April 23, 2007, the U.S. 

Trade Representative instructed the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) to implement its findings 

under section 129 of the Uruguay Round 

Agreements Act (URAA) regarding the 

offsetting of dumped sales with nondumped sales in investigations 

involving average-to-average 

transactions. The Department issued its 

findings on April 9, 2007, regarding 

eleven investigations challenged by the 

European Communities before the 

World Trade Organization. The 

Department is now implementing those 

findings. 

DATES: The effective date of these 

determinations is April 23, 2007. 


cprice-sewell on DSK89S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
25262 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 86 / Friday, May 4, 2007 / Notices 

1With respect to Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip 

in Coils from Italy (A–475–824), one interested 

party made allegations of computational errors in 

calculating the weighted-average dumping margin. 

The Department found that there was a reasonable 

basis to investigate the allegations further, and 

postponed its decision in that proceeding in order 

to place additional information on the 

administrative record, and allow interested parties 

additional time to comment. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Daniel O’Brien, William Kovatch, or 

Michael Rill, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Ave., NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–1376, (202) 482–5052, or (202) 482– 

3058, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 22, 2007, the Department 

initiated twelve proceedings under 

section 129 of the URAA to implement 

the WTO dispute settlement panel’s 

report in United States—Laws, 

Regulations and Methodology for 

Calculating Dumping Margins 

(‘‘Zeroing’’) (WT/DS294). In each 

proceeding, the Department recalculated 

the weighted-average dumping margin 

from the following antidumping 

investigations, applying the calculation 

methodology described in Antidumping 

Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin 

During an Antidumping Investigation; 

Final Modification; see 71 FR 77722 

(December 27, 2006): 

1. Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel 

from the Netherlands (A–421–807). 

2. Stainless Steel Bar From France 

(A–427–820). 

3. Stainless Steel Bar From Germany 

(A–428–830). 

4. Stainless Steel Bar From Italy 

(A–475–829). 

5. Stainless Steel Bar From the United 

Kingdom (A–412–822). 

6. Stainless Steel Wire Rod From 

Sweden (A–401–806). 

7. Stainless Steel Wire Rod From 

Spain (A–469–807). 

8. Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Italy 

(A–475–820). 

9. Certain Stainless Steel Plate in 

Coils from Belgium (A–423–808). 

10. Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in 

Coils from Italy (A–475–824). 

11. Certain Cut-to-Length Carbonquality Steel Plate From Italy (A–475– 

826). 

12. Certain Pasta From Italy (A–475– 

818). 

On February 26, 2007, the Department 

issued its preliminary results and 

requested comments. After receiving 

comments and rebuttal comments from 

the interested parties, the Department 

issued its Final Results for the Section 

129 Determinations in eleven of the 

twelve proceedings on April 9, 2007.1

On April 20, 2007, consistent with 

section 129(b)(3) of the URAA, the U.S. 

Trade Representative held consultations 

with the Department and the 

appropriate congressional committees 

with respect to these determinations. On 

April 23, 2007, in accordance with 

sections 129(b)(4) and 129(c)(1)(B) of the 

URAA, the U.S. Trade Representative 

directed the Department to implement 

these determinations. 

Nature of the Proceedings 

Section 129 of the URAA governs the 

nature and effect of determinations 

issued by the Department to implement 

findings by WTO dispute settlement 

panels and the Appellate Body. 

Specifically, section 129(b)(2) provides 

that ‘‘notwithstanding any provision of 

the Tariff Act of 1930,’’ within 180 days 

of a written request from the U.S. Trade 

Representative, the Department shall 

issue a determination that would render 

its actions not inconsistent with an 

adverse finding of a WTO panel or the 

Appellate Body. See 19 U.S.C. 

3538(b)(2). The Statement of 

Administrative Action, U.R.A.A., H. 

Doc. 316, Vol. 1, 103d Cong. (1994) 

(SAA), variously refers to such a 

determination by the Department as a 

‘‘new,’’ ‘‘second,’’ and ‘‘different’’ 

determination. See SAA at 1025, 1027. 

After consulting with the Department 

and the appropriate congressional 

committees, the U.S. Trade 

Representative may direct the 

Department to implement, in whole or 

in part, the new determination made 

under section 129. See 19 U.S.C. 

3538(b)(4). Pursuant to section 129(c), 

the new determination shall apply with 

respect to unliquidated entries of the 

subject merchandise that are entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date on 

which the U.S. Trade Representative 

directs the Department to implement the 

new determination. See 19 U.S.C. 

3538(c). The new determination is 

subject to judicial review separate and 

apart from judicial review of the 

Department’s original determination. 

See 19 U.S.C. 1516a(a)(2)(B)(vii). 

Analysis of Comments Received 

The issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs submitted by interested 

parties to these proceedings are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of 

the Section 129 Determinations, from 

Stephen J. Claeys to David M. Spooner, 

dated April 9, 2007 (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum), which is hereby 

adopted by this notice. The Issues and 

Decisions Memorandum is on file in the 

Central Records Unit (CRU), room 

B–099 of the Department of Commerce 

main building and can be accessed 

directly at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The 

paper copy and electronic version of the 

Issues and Decisions Memorandum are 

identical in content. A list of the issues 

addressed in the Issues and Decisions 

Memorandum is appended to this 

notice. 

Final Antidumping Margins 

The recalculated margins, unchanged 

from the Preliminary Results for all 

cases, except the investigation of 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils 

from Italy, are as follows: 

(1) Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel 

From the Netherlands 

• The margin for Corus, the sole 

respondent, decreases from 2.59 percent 

to zero. Since Corus was the only 

respondent in the investigation, we are 

now revoking this order effective April 

23, 2007 (the effective date). 

(2) Stainless Steel Bar From France 

• The margin for UGITECH decreases 

from 3.9 percent to zero. We are now 

revoking this order for UGITECH 

effective April 23, 2007 (the effective 

date). 

• The margin for Aubert and Duval 

S.A. was based on total AFA. This 

margin does not change as a result of 

this proceeding. 

• Since there are no non-AFA, above 

de minimis margins remaining, 

pursuant to Department practice, the all 

others rate is based on a simple average 

of the zero margins and the AFA 

margins. Therefore, the all-others rate 

changes from 3.9 percent to 35.92 

percent. 

(3) Stainless Steel Bar From Germany 

• The margin for BGH decreases from 

13.63 percent to 2.59 percent. 

• The margin for Einsal decreases 

from 4.17 percent to de minimis. We are 

now revoking this order for Einsal 

effective April 23, 2007 (the effective 

date). 

• The margin for Edelstahl WittenKrefeld GmbH decreases from 15.40 

percent to 10.82 percent. 

• The margin for Krupp 

Edelstahlprofile GmbH decreases from 

32.32 percent to 31.25 percent. 

• The all-others rate changes from 

16.96 percent to 15.16 percent. 

(4) Stainless Steel Bar From Italy 

• The margin for Acciaiera Valbruna 

S.p.A. decreases from 2.50 percent to 


cprice-sewell on DSK89S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 86 / Friday, May 4, 2007 / Notices 25263 

zero. We are now revoking this order for 

Acciaiera Valbruna S.p.A. effective 

April 23, 2007 (the effective date). 

• The margin for Acciaiera Foroni 

S.p.A. decreases from 7.07 percent to 

zero. We are now revoking this order for 

Acciaiera Foroni S.p.A. effective April 

23, 2007 (the effective date). 

• Trafilerie Bedini S.r.l. was excluded 

from the order and that does not change 

as a result of this proceeding. 

• The margin for Cogne Acciai 

Speciali Srl was based on total AFA. 

This margin does not change as a result 

of this proceeding. 

• The margin for Rodacciai S.p.A. 

decreases from 3.83 percent to zero. We 

are now revoking this order for 

Rodacciai S.p.A. effective April 23, 2007 

(the effective date). 

• Since there are no non-AFA above 

de minimis margins remaining, 

pursuant to Department practice, the allothers rate is based on a simple average 

of the zero margins and the AFA 

margins. Therefore, the all-others rate 

changes from 3.81 percent to 6.60 

percent. 

(5) Stainless Steel Bar From the United 

Kingdom 

• The margin for Corus Engineering 

Steels Ltd. decreases from 4.48 percent 

to zero. We are now revoking this order 

for Corus Engineering Steels Ltd. 

effective April 23, 2007 (the effective 

date). 

• Firth Rixon Special Steels Ltd. and 

Crownridge Stainless Steel Ltd.’s/Valkia 

Ltd.’s margins were based on total AFA. 

These margins do not change as a result 

of this proceeding. 

• Since there are no non-AFA above 

de minimis margins remaining, 

pursuant to Department practice, the allothers rate is based on a simple average 

of the zero margins and the AFA 

margins. Therefore, the all-others rate 

changes from 4.48 percent to 83.85 

percent. 

(6) Stainless Steel Wire Rod From 

Sweden 

• The margin for Fagersta Stainless 

AB decreases from 5.71 percent to zero. 

Since Fagersta Stainless AB was the 

only respondent in the investigation, we 

are now revoking this order effective 

April 23, 2007 (the effective date). 

(7) Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Spain 

• The margin for Roldan S.A., the 

sole respondent, decreases from 4.76 

percent to 2.71 percent. 

• The all-others rate changes from 

4.76 percent to 2.71 percent. 

(8) Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Italy 

• The margin for Cogne Acciai 

Speciali S.r.l. decreases from 12.73 

percent to 11.25 percent. 

• Acciaiera Valbruna S.p.A. was 

excluded from the order and that does 

not change as a result of this 

proceeding. 

• The all-others rate changes from 

12.73 percent to 11.25 percent. 

(9) Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From 

Belgium 

• The margin for Ugine & ALZ 

Belgium (formerly ALZ N.V.), the sole 

respondent, decreases from 9.84 percent 

to 8.54 percent. 

• The all-others rate changes from 

9.84 percent to 8.54 percent. 

(10) Certain Cut-To-Length CarbonQuality Steel Plate Products From Italy 

• The margin for Palini and Bertoli 

S.p.A. decreases from 7.85 percent to 

7.64 percent. 

• ILVA S.p.A. was excluded from the 

order and that does not change as a 

result of this proceeding. 

• The all-others rate changes from 

7.85 percent to 7.64 percent. 

(11) Certain Pasta From Italy 

• The margin for Arrighi S.p.A. 

Industrie Alimentari decreases from 

21.34 percent to 20.84 percent. 

• The margin for Liguori Pastificio 

Dal 1820 S.p.A. decreases from 12.41 

percent to 12.14 percent. 

• The margin for Pastificio Fratelli 

Pagani S.p.A. decreases from 18.30 

percent to 18.23 percent. 

• The margin for La Molisana 

Industrie Alimentari S.p.A. remains at 

14.78 percent based on this 

recalculation. 

• De Matteis Agroalimentare S.p.A. 

and Delverde S.r.l. were excluded from 

the order and that does not change as a 

result of this proceeding. 

• F.lli De Cecco de Filippo Fara San 

Martino S.p.A.’s margin was based on 

total AFA. This margin does not change 

as a result of this proceeding. 

• The all-others rate changes from 

12.09 percent to 16.51 percent. We note 

that Delverde S.r.l.’s margin in the 

investigation was a component of the 

all-others rate. However, since Delverde 

S.r.l. was later revoked from the order 

as a result of litigation relating to the 

investigation, its margin is no longer a 

component of the all others rate. We 

note also that, for cash deposit 

purposes, we deduct from the margin of 

dumping any export subsidies. On that 

basis, the new cash deposit rate that will 

be established for all others is 15.45 

percent. 

Revocations, Cash Deposits and 

Continuation of the Suspension of 

Liquidation 

On April 23, 2007, in accordance with 

sections 129(b)(4) and 129(c)(1)(B) of the 

URAA, the U.S. Trade Representative, 

after consulting with the Department 

and Congress, directed the Department 

to implement these determinations. 

With respect to Certain Hot-Rolled 

Carbon Steel from the Netherlands and 

Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Sweden, 

we will instruct U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate 

without regard to antidumping duties 

entries of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after April 23, 

2007, (the effective date), and to 

discontinue collection of cash deposits 

of antidumping duties. 

With respect to Stainless Steel Bar 

from France, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate without regard to antidumping 

duties entries of the subject 

merchandise manufactured and 

exported by UGITECH, entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after April 23, 2007, 

(the effective date), and to discontinue 

collection of cash deposits of 

antidumping duties. We will instruct 

CBP to continue to suspend liquidation 

of all entries of subject merchandise 

from all other exporters or producers. 

CBP shall continue to require a cash 

deposit equal to the estimated amount 

by which the normal value exceeds the 

U.S. price. The suspension of 

liquidation instructions will remain in 

effect until further notice. The Section 

129 Determination all-others rate will be 

the new cash deposit rate for all 

exporters of subject merchandise for 

whom the Department has not 

calculated an individual rate. 

With respect to Stainless Steel Bar 

from Germany, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate without regard to antidumping 

duties entries of the subject 

merchandise manufactured and 

exported by Einsal, entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after April 23, 2007, 

(the effective date), and to discontinue 

collection of cash deposits of 

antidumping duties. We will instruct 

CBP to continue to suspend liquidation 

of all entries of subject merchandise 

from all other exporters or producers. 

CBP shall continue to require a cash 

deposit equal to the estimated amount 

by which the normal value exceeds the 

U.S. price. The suspension of 

liquidation instructions will remain in 

effect until further notice. The Section 

129 Determination all-others rate will be 

the new cash deposit rate for all 


cprice-sewell on DSK89S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
25264 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 86 / Friday, May 4, 2007 / Notices 

exporters of subject merchandise for 

whom the Department has not 

calculated an individual rate. 

With respect to Stainless Steel Bar 

from Italy, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate without regard to antidumping 

duties entries of the subject 

merchandise manufactured and 

exported by Acciaiera Valbruna S.p.A., 

Acciaiera Foroni S.p.A. and Rodacciai 

S.p.A., entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

April 23, 2007, (the effective date), and 

to discontinue collection of cash 

deposits of antidumping duties. We will 

instruct CBP to continue to suspend 

liquidation of all entries of subject 

merchandise from all other exporters or 

producers. CBP shall continue to require 

a cash deposit equal to the estimated 

amount by which the normal value 

exceeds the U.S. price. The suspension 

of liquidation instructions will remain 

in effect until further notice. The 

Section 129 Determination all-others 

rate will be the new cash deposit rate for 

all exporters of subject merchandise for 

whom the Department has not 

calculated an individual rate. 

With respect to Stainless Steel Bar 

from the United Kingdom, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate without regard 

to antidumping duties entries of the 

subject merchandise manufactured and 

exported by Corus Engineering Steels 

Ltd., entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

April 23, 2007, (the effective date), and 

to discontinue collection of cash 

deposits of antidumping duties. We will 

instruct CBP to continue to suspend 

liquidation of all entries of subject 

merchandise from all other exporters or 

producers. CBP shall continue to require 

a cash deposit equal to the estimated 

amount by which the normal value 

exceeds the U.S. price. The suspension 

of liquidation instructions will remain 

in effect until further notice. The 

Section 129 Determination all-others 

rate will be the new cash deposit rate for 

all exporters of subject merchandise for 

whom the Department has not 

calculated an individual rate. 

With respect to Stainless Steel Wire 

Rod from Spain, we will instruct CBP to 

continue to suspend liquidation of all 

entries of subject merchandise from all 

exporters or producers. CBP shall 

continue to require a cash deposit equal 

to the estimated amount by which the 

normal value exceeds the U.S. price. 

The suspension of liquidation 

instructions will remain in effect until 

further notice. The Section 129 

Determination all-others rate will be the 

new cash deposit rate for all exporters 

of subject merchandise for whom the 

Department has not calculated an 

individual rate. 

With respect to Stainless Steel Wire 

Rod from Italy, we will instruct CBP to 

continue to suspend liquidation of all 

entries of subject merchandise from all 

exporters or producers. CBP shall 

continue to require a cash deposit equal 

to the estimated amount by which the 

normal value exceeds the U.S. price. 

The suspension of liquidation 

instructions will remain in effect until 

further notice. The Section 129 

Determination all-others rate will be the 

new cash deposit rate for all exporters 

of subject merchandise for whom the 

Department has not calculated an 

individual rate. 

With respect to Stainless Steel Plate 

in Coils from Belgium, we will instruct 

CBP to continue to suspend liquidation 

of all entries of subject merchandise 

from all exporters or producers. CBP 

shall continue to require a cash deposit 

equal to the estimated amount by which 

the normal value exceeds the U.S. price. 

The suspension of liquidation 

instructions will remain in effect until 

further notice. The Section 129 

Determination all-others rate will be the 

new cash deposit rate for all exporters 

of subject merchandise for whom the 

Department has not calculated an 

individual rate. 

With respect to Certain Cut-To-Length 

Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products 

from Italy, we will instruct CBP to 

continue to suspend liquidation of all 

entries of subject merchandise from all 

exporters or producers. CBP shall 

continue to require a cash deposit equal 

to the estimated amount by which the 

normal value exceeds the U.S. price. 

The suspension of liquidation 

instructions will remain in effect until 

further notice. The Section 129 

Determination all-others rate will be the 

new cash deposit rate for all exporters 

of subject merchandise for whom the 

Department has not calculated an 

individual rate. 

With respect to Certain Pasta from 

Italy, we will instruct CBP to continue 

to suspend liquidation of all entries of 

subject merchandise from all exporters 

or producers. CBP shall continue to 

require a cash deposit equal to the 

estimated amount by which the normal 

value exceeds the U.S. price. The 

suspension of liquidation instructions 

will remain in effect until further notice. 

The Section 129 Determination allothers rate will be the new cash deposit 

rate for all exporters of subject 

merchandise for whom the Department 

has not calculated an individual rate. 

The cash deposit rates will remain 

unchanged for those companies that we 

are not revoking and whose cash deposit 

rates since the original investigation 

have been superseded by administrative 

reviews. 

These Section 129 Determinations are 

issued and published in accordance 

with section 129(c)(2)(A) of the URAA. 

Dated: April 30, 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix I 

Issues Raised in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum 

Comment 1: Whether the Department Has the 

Authority to Implement the WTO 

Appellate Body Decision 

Comment 2: Targeted Dumping 

Comment 3: Treatment of Unliquidated 

Entries 

Comment 4: Calculation of All-Others Rate 

Comment 5: Clerical Error Allegation in the 

Investigation of Stainless Steel Sheet and 

Strip in Coils from Italy 

Comment 6: Clarification of Valbruna 

Exporter Name 

Comment 7: The Department’s Briefing 

Schedule 

[FR Doc. 07–2212 Filed 5–3–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

[Docket Number: 070419095–7101–01] 

NIST Consortium/Consortia for PostComplementary Metal Oxide 

Semiconductor (CMOS) 

Nanoelectronics Research Program; 

Availability of Funds 

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards 

and Technology, Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The National Institute of 

Standards and Technology (NIST) 

announces that NIST seeks to work with 

a consortium or consortia to fund basic 

research in the field of nanoscale 

electronics focused on developing the 

next logic switch beyond 

complementary metal oxide 

semiconductor (CMOS). 

DATES: All applications, paper and 

electronic, must be received no later 

that 5 p.m. Daylight Savings Time on 

June 4, 2007. Late applications will not 

be reviewed nor considered. 

ADDRESSES: Application packages may 

be obtained by contacting Jason Boehm, 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 

1060, Gaithersburg, MD 20899–1060, 

phone (301) 975–8678, or by 

downloading them through Grants.gov. 

Completed application packages may be 


cprice-sewell on DSK89S0YB1PROD with NOTICES