alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012109EN.01000701.xml

| 14.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/7

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Ankenævnet for Uddannelsesstøtten (Denmark), lodged on 26 January 2012 — L.N.

(Case C-46/12)

2012/C 109/12

Language of the case: Danish

Referring tribunal

Referring tribunal

Ankenævnet for Uddannelsesstøtten (Appeals Tribunal, the Danish Students’ Grants and Loans Scheme)

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Applicant: L.N.

Applicant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does Article 7(1)(c), read in conjunction with Article 24(2), of the Directive on residence) (1) mean that a Member State (host Member State), in the assessment of whether a person must be deemed to be a worker entitled to education assistance, may take account of the fact that the person entered the host Member State for the principal purpose of following a course of study, with the result that the host Member State is not obliged to grant education assistance aid for studies to that person (see aforementioned Article 24(2) of the Directive on residence)?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (OJ 2004 L 158, p. 77).

1

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 6, 2016

d0829 

# Order

Clerk September 6, 2016

150569(87)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150569

COA: 316063

Wayne CC: 12

- 008623

- FC

ERIC MELVIN SULLIVAN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s April 25,

2016 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it do es not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
#### § 5.31 Incompetence.

*Incompetence* is the inability on the part of a person to perform required duties, whether due to professional deficiencies, physical disability, mental incapacity, or any combination thereof.
#### § 30.10-38 Lightweight—TB/ALL.

The term *lightweight* means the displacement of a vessel in metric tons without cargo, oil fuel, lubricating oil, ballast water, fresh water, feedwater in tanks, consumable stores, and persons and their effects.

[CGD 74-127, 41 FR 3843, Jan. 26, 1976]
# C_2014052EN.01001502.xml

| 22.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 December 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Ministero dello Sviluppo economico, Autorità per la vigilanza sui contratti pubblici di lavori, servizi e forniture v SOA Nazionale Costruttori — Organismo di Attestazione SpA

(Case C-327/12) (1)

1

(Articles 101 TFEU, 102 TFEU and 106 TFEU - Public undertakings and undertakings to which special or exclusive rights have been granted - Undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest - Definition - Bodies tasked with checking and certifying compliance by undertakings carrying out public works with the conditions required by the law - Article 49 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Restriction - Justification - Protection of recipients of services - Status of certification services)

2014/C 52/24

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Ministero dello Sviluppo economico, Autorità per la vigilanza sui contratti pubblici di lavori, servizi e forniture

Applicants:

Defendant: SOA Nazionale Costruttori — Organismo di Attestazione SpA

Defendant:

Intervening parties: Associazione nazionale Società Organismi di Attestazione (Unionsoa), SOA CQOP SpA

Intervening parties:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Consiglio di Stato — Interpretation of Articles 101 TFEU, 102 TFEU and 106 TFEU — Concepts of ‘public undertakings and undertakings to which Member States grant special or exclusive rights’ and ‘Undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest’ — Bodies responsible for verifying and attesting to the fact that potential subcontractors for public works comply with the conditions laid down by law — National legislation imposing minimum tariffs on those bodies.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 101 TFEU, 102 TFEU and 106 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that they do not preclude national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which imposes on companies classified as attestation organisations (Società Organismi di Attestazione) a scheme of minimum tariffs for certification services offered to undertakings seeking to participate in procedures for the award of public works contracts

Such national legislation constitutes a restriction of the freedom of establishment within the meaning of Article 49 TFEU, but is suitable for attaining the objective of protecting the recipients of the services in question. It is for the referring court to determine whether, in the light of, inter alia, the method of calculating the minimum tariffs, particularly in the light of the number of categories of work for which the certificate is drawn up, that national legislation goes beyond what is necessary to attain that objective.

---

(1)  OJ C 295, 29.9.2012.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Pop N Go, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Melvin Wyman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |                                                    
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  May 20, 2008 | By: /s/ Melvin Wyman                               
|                     | Melvin Wyman                                       
|                     | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Ja nuary

29, 2010 Subject: Meeting with Environmental Groups to Discuss the Portland Cement NESHAP Location: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Washington DC Date: March 16 , 2010 Participants: see attached page On March 16, 2010 several environmental groups met with Janet McCabe, Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator for the Office of Air and Radiation, and other EPA personnel. The groups discussed their concerns and perspectives on the upcoming final rulemaking for the Portland Cement NESHAP.
§ 42.11-20 Application for annual survey. ( a ) The owner, master, or agent of a vessel holding a load line certificate shall apply to the assigning and issuing authority who issued the certificate for the annual survey required by § 42.09-40 or the International Convention on Load Lines, 1966.
[CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10058, July 12, 1968]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, each of the undersigned officers of Central
Federal Corporation (the "Corporation"), hereby certifies that the Corporation's
Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Corporation. The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the
Report or as a separate disclosure document.

Dated: May 20, 2003      By:   /s/ David C. Vernon
                               -------------------------------------
                                David C. Vernon
                                Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
                                (principal executive officer)

                         By:   /s/ Kelley A.Nanna
                               -------------------------------------
                                Kelly L. Nanna, CPA
                                Treasurer
                                (principal financial officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Central Federal Corporation and will be retained by it and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 44.330 Obtaining working freeboards for hopper dredges. A hopper dredge may be issued a working freeboard on a limited service domestic voyage load line certificate or a Great Lakes load line certificate if the following are met: ( a ) The hopper dredge structure must have adequate strength for any draft up to the working freeboard draft. Dredges built and maintained in conformity with the requirements of a classification society recognized by the Commandant usually meet this requirement.
( b ) The hopper dredge must— ( 1 ) Meet subpart I of part 174 of this chapter; and
( 2 ) Have on its bridge remote draft indicators that: ( i ) Show the fore, aft, and mean draft of the dredge at all times while the dredge is operating; and
( ii ) Have each indicator marked with the assigned freeboard and the working freeboard.
#### § 4.03-20 Coast Guard district.

A Coast Guard district is one of the geographical areas whose boundaries are described in 33 CFR part 3.
#### Cincinnati Bar Association *v.*Reisenfeld. (Two cases.)

[Cite *as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Reisenfeld*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 30.]

(Nos. 98-382 and 98-383

Submitted July 8, 1998

Decided November 18, 1998.)

*31
      *Frederick 0. Kiel, Gates T. Richards*and *Edwin W. Patterson III,*General Counsel, for relator.

*John H. Burlew,*for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

We adopt the findings and conclusion of the board. In determining a sanction to be imposed, we consider the duty violated, the lawyer’s mental state, the injury caused, and the existence of mitigating circumstances. *Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bunce*(1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 112, 115, 689 N.E.2d 566, 568, and cases cited therein.

We have previously said that “lawyers must not take a cavalier attitude toward their notary responsibilities.” *Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Papcke*(1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 91, 93, 689 N.E.2d 549, 551. Respondents did notarize signatures that were inscribed in their presence, Sylvan did produce accurate renditions of the statements made by the clients over these signatures, and although Bradley failed to accurately reproduce Erdman’s statements, Erdman did not suffer any damage. Nonetheless, respondents’ actions violated the duties imposed upon notaries by R.C. Chapter 147.

In *Disciplinary Counsel v. Fowerbaugh*(1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 187, 190, 658 N.E.2d 237, 240, and in later opinions, we said that “[w]hen an attorney engages in a course of conduct resulting in a finding that the attorney has violated DR 1-102(A)(4), the attorney will be actually suspended from the practice of law for an appropriate period of time.” See *Disciplinary Counsel v. Simecek*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 320, 699 N.E.2d 933. Respondents, however, took these improper *32actions in only a .few isolated cases that they believed presented emergency situations, and their actions caused no damage to any client. Respondents’ actions were but a few isolated incidents in otherwise unblemished legal careers, not a course of conduct. Additionally, respondents cooperated with relator in its investigation.

We therefore adopt the recommendation of the board with respect to respondent Sylvan Reisenfeld. Sylvan Reisenfeld is hereby publicly reprimanded. But in light of the fact that Bradley Reisenfeld inaccurately added a statement — one that Erdman allegedly never made — to Erdman’s affidavit, Bradley’s conduct warrants a harsher sanction. Bradley Reisenfeld is hereby suspended from the practice of law for six months, with the entire six months suspended. Costs are taxed to respondents.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.

Douglas, J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur with the majority with regard to the sanction imposed on respondent Sylvan P. Reisenfeld. I dissent as to the sanction imposed on Bradley A. Reisenfeld. I would impose a public reprimand.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 21.1
List of Subsidiaries
Subsidiary                                          Jurisdiction of Organization
Capital Management of Bermuda                       Bermuda
Captive Resources, Inc                              Delaware
CFM Insurance Managers                              Bermuda
Chesapeake Insurance Company                        Bermuda
CRS Services Inc.                                   Delaware
Commonwealth Risk Services LLP                      Delaware
Genesis Holdings                                    Cayman
H&H Park International                              Bermuda
Hurst Holme Insurance Co                            Bermuda
International Advisory Services Ltd                 Bermuda
IPC Mutual Holdings, Ltd                            Bermuda
Kensington Management Group Ltd.                    Cayman
Legion Financial Corp                               Missouri
Legion Indemnity Co                                 Illinois
Legion Insurance Company                            Pennsylvania
Legion Management Corp                              Oklahoma
MG Financial Ltd                                    Delaware
MGL Investments Ltd                                 Delaware
MRM Financial Services Ltd                          Bermuda
MRM Global Captive Group, Ltd.                      Bermuda
MRM Intermediairies Ltd                             UK
MRM Life                                            Bermuda
MRM Securities Ltd                                  Bermuda
MRM Services Ltd                                    Bermuda
MRM Services (Barbados) Ltd.                        Barbados
MRM Specialty Brokerage Ltd                         Bermuda
MSL (US) Ltd.                                       Delaware
Mutual Finance Ltd                                  Bermuda
Mutual Group Ltd                                    Delaware
Mutual Holdings (Bermuda) Ltd                       Bermuda
Mutual Holdings (US) Ltd                            Delaware
Mutual Indemnity (Barbados) Ltd                     Barbados
Mutual Indemnity (Bermuda) Ltd                      Bermuda
Mutual Indemnity (Dublin) Ltd                       Ireland
Mutual Indemnity (US) Ltd                           Bermuda
Mutual Indemnity Ltd                                Bermuda
Mutual Risk Captive Group Ltd                       Bermuda
Mutual Risk Management (Cayman) Ltd                 Cayman
Mutual Risk Management (Holdings) Ltd               Bermuda
Mutual Risk Management Ltd                          Bermuda
Mutual Risk Management(Barbados) Ltd                Barbados
Mutual Trust Management
Psychiatrists Mutual Insurance Company              Barbados
Premium Securities (Bermuda) Ltd                    Bermuda
Premium Securities Ltd                              Bermuda
SPDA                                                Bermuda
Villanova Insurance Company                         Pennsylvania
Worksafe, Inc.                                      Delaware
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.708 Cargo boil-off as fuel: Valves. ( a ) Gas fuel lines to the gas consuming equipment must have two fail-closed automatic valves in series. A third valve, designed to fail-open, must vent that portion of pipe between the two series valves to the open atmosphere.
( b ) The valves under paragraph (a) of this section must be arranged so that loss of boiler forced draft, flame failure, or abnormal gas fuel supply pressure automatically causes the two series valves to close and the vent valve to open. The function of one of the series valves and the vent valve may be performed by a single three-way valve.
( c ) A master gas fuel valve must be located outside the machinery space, but be operable from inside the machinery space and at the valve. The valve must automatically close when there is: ( 1 ) A gas leak detected under § 154.706(a)(2) or § 154.706(b);
( 2 ) Loss of the ventilation under § 154.706(a)(2) or § 154.707(c); or
( 3 ) Loss of inert gas pressure within the double-walled piping system under § 154.706(a)(1).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 29526)    
                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Biophysics of Neural Systems Study Section, June 21, 2007, 8 a.m. to June 22, 2007, 4 p.m. Jurys Washington Hotel, 1500 New Hampshire Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20032 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 17, 2007, 72 FR 27828-27830.                

The meeting will be held on June 21, 2007, from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. The meeting location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: May 21, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2625  Filed 5-25-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WATSON WARD,

Plaintiff,

v.

IVORY, ET AL., 

Defendants. 

 /

Case Number: 2:15-CV-11653

HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Michigan state prisoner Watson Ward filed a pro se civil rights complaint under

42 U.S.C. § 1983. Now before the Court are two letter-motions from Plaintiff requesting

voluntary dismissal of his complaint. 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) permits a plaintiff to dismiss an action

without leave of the adverse party or the court at any time before service by the adverse

party of an answer or of a motion for summary judgment. Respondent has not yet been

served with the petition and, therefore, has not filed an answer or motion for summary

judgment. 

The Court GRANTS Petitioner’s letter-motions for dismissal (dkt. # 8 and #9) and

the matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

Dated: July 27, 2015

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2:15-cv-11653-GCS-MJH Doc # 10 Filed 07/27/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 26
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

July 27, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also on

Watson Ward #507557, Macomb Correctional Facility, 

34625 26 Mile Road, New Haven, MI 48048.

s/Barbara Radke

Deputy Clerk

2

2:15-cv-11653-GCS-MJH Doc # 10 Filed 07/27/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 27
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

The Council shall provide advice and recommendations to the Director, NIH, or other appropriate delegated officials on matters related to the policies and activities of the Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives including making recommendations with respect to the conduct and support of research that represents important areas of emerging scientific opportunities, rising public health challenges, or knowledge gaps that deserve special emphasis and would benefit from conducting or supporting additional research that involves collaboration between two or more national research institutes or national centers, or would otherwise benefit from strategic coordination and planning.

Duration of this committee is two years from the date the Charter is filed.

Dated: March 29, 2007.

Elias A. Zerhouni,

Director, National Institutes of Health.

[FR Doc. 07-1730  Filed 4-6-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M