alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### United States Institute of Peace

# Date/Time:

Wednesday, June 13, 2007 (9 a.m.-8 p.m.) Thursday, June 14, 2007 (9:30 a.m.-4 p.m.)

# Location:

NDU—National War College, Roosevelt Hall, Ft. McNair, 300 5th Avenue, Washington, DC.

# Status:

Open Session—Portions may be closed pursuant to Subsection (c) of Section 552(b) of Title 5, United States Code, as provided in subsection 1706(h)(3) of the United States Institute of Peace Act, Public Law 98-525.

# Agenda:

June 2007 Board Meeting; Approval of Minutes of the One Hundred Twenty-Sixth Meeting (March 12, 2007) of the Board of Directors; Chairman's Report; President's Report; Program Updates; Selection of National Peace Essay Contest Winners; Selection of Peace Scholars; Other General Issues.

# Contact:

Tessie F. Higgs, Executive Office, Telephone: (202) 429-3836.

Dated: May 22, 2007.

Patricia P. Thompson,

Executive Vice President, United States Institute of Peace.

[FR Doc. 07-2648 Filed 5-24-07; 11:09 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-AR-M
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending September 29, 2007

|Filer                     | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                                  
|------------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|Security Business Bancorp | 3A1            | Security Business Bancorp to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Security Business Bank of San Diego, both of San Diego, California. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                | Not applicable
|Federal Register:         | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

November 20, 2012

s1113

Order 

November 20, 2012

145548

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145548

COA: 308165

Wayne CC: 88-012266-02

REGINALD BELL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 19, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 18, 2020

NO. 03

- 20

- 00497

- CV

Ruth Hughs in her Official Capacity as the Texas Secretary of State, Appellant

v.

Move Texas Action Fund, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 419TH DI STRI CT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND SMITH

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the inte r locutory order signed by the tr i a l court on October 16, 2020

.

Having reviewed the record

, it appears that the C ourt lacks jurisdiction over the appeal

.

Therefore, the C ourt dismisses the appeal fo r want of jurisdiction

. The appellant shall pay all

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
§ 58.01-55 Tanks for flammable and combustible oil. ( a ) For the purposes of this section, a machinery space of category A is a space that contains any of the following: ( 1 ) Internal-combustion machinery used for main propulsion.
( 2 ) Internal-combustion machinery used for other than main propulsion, whose power output is equal to or greater than 500 HP (375 kw).
( 3 ) Any oil-fired boiler.
( 4 ) Any equipment used to prepare fuel oil for delivery to an oil-fired boiler, or equipment used to prepare heated oil for delivery to an internal-combustion engine, including any oil-pressure pumps, filters, and heaters dealing with oil pressures above 26 psi.
( b ) As far as practicable, each fuel-oil tank must be part of the vessel's structure and be located outside a machinery space of category A.
( c ) If a fuel-oil tank, other than a double-bottom tank, must be located adjacent to or within a machinery space of category A— ( 1 ) At least one of its vertical sides must be contiguous to the boundary of the machinery space;
( 2 ) The tank must have a common boundary with the double-bottom tanks; and
( 3 ) The area of the tank boundary common with the machinery spaces must be kept as small as practicable.
( d ) If a fuel-oil tank must be located within a machinery space of category A, it must not contain fuel oil with a flashpoint of less than 60 °C (140 °F).
( e ) In general, no freestanding fuel-oil tank is permitted in any machinery space of Category A on a passenger vessel. A freestanding fuel-oil tank is permitted in other spaces only if authorized by the Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center. If so authorized, each freestanding fuel-oil tank must— ( 1 ) Comply with subpart 58.50; and
( 2 ) Be placed in an oil-tight spill tray with a drain pipe leading to a spill-oil tank.
( f ) No fuel-oil tank may be located where spillage or leakage from it can constitute a hazard by falling on heated surfaces. The design must also prevent any oil that may escape under pressure from any pump, filter, or heater from coming into contact with heated surfaces.
[CGD 83-043, 60 FR 24776, May 10, 1995, as amended by USCG-2020-0634, 89 FR 50172, June 12, 2024]
#### The State ex rel. Larkins, Appellant, *v.*Aurelius, Judge, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Larkins v. Aurelius*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 112.]

(No. 98-1300

Submitted October 12, 1998

Decided December 9, 1998.)

*113
      *Ronald Larkins, pro se.*

*Stephanie Tubbs Jones,*Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Saleh S. Awadallah,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

*Per Curiam.*

Larkins asserts that the court of appeals erred by denying the writ of mandamus to vacate his criminal convictions. For the following reasons, however, we find that Larkins’s claims are meritless and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

As the court of appeals correctly held, the failure to comply with R.C. 2945.05 may be remedied only in a direct appeal from a criminal conviction. *State v. Pless*(1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 333, 658 N.E.2d 766, paragraph two of the syllabus. A claimed violation of R.C. 2945.05 is not the proper subject for an extraordinary writ. See *Jackson v. Rose*(1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 51, 679 N.E.2d 684, 685.

In addition, because Larkins essentially requests release from prison, mandamus will not he. *State ex rel. Sampson v. Parrott*(1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 92, 93, 694 N.E.2d 463, 463-464.

Based on the foregoing, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending March 11, 2006

|Filer                                                | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                             
|---------------------------------------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|LAKE BANK SHARES, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN | * 3A3         | Lake Bank Shares, Inc., Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Emmons, Minnesota, proposes to increase its ownership of Lake Bank Shares, Inc., Emmons, Minnesota, from 35.68 percent to 65.67 percent. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:04/06/2006
|Newspaper:                                           | Not available
|Federal Register:                                    | 04/06/2006   
|SALISH AND KOOTENAI BANCORPORATION                   | * 3A1         | Salish and Kootenai Bancorporation, Polson, Montana, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the capital stock of Eagle Bank, Polson, Montana, a de novo bank.             | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:03/03/2006
|Newspaper:                                           | Not available
|Federal Register:                                    | 03/03/2006   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-111966, 333-81876, 333-103241 and 333-32225) of Digital Video
Systems, Inc. and the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (file
Nos. 333-65598, 333-103243, and 333-39211) of Digital Video Systems, Inc. of our report dated April
14, 2005 relating to the financial December 31, 2004 statement and financial statement schedule
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ Stonefield Josephson

San Francisco, California
                   April 11, 2005

---
2:14-mj-30493-DUTY Doc # 3 Filed 09/24/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 11
2:14-mj-30493-DUTY Doc # 3 Filed 09/24/14 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 12
#### § 502.704 Reply.

The Bureau of Enforcement may, within twenty (20) days of service of the response filed by the applicant or licensee, file with the administrative law judge and serve upon the applicant or licensee a reply memorandum accompanied by appropriate affidavits and supporting documents.
Exhibit 21
Subsidiaries of Registrant       **STATE OR** ** **  **JURISDICTION OF** **NAME UNDER WHICH SUBSIDIARY****SUBSIDIARIES** **INCORPORATION** **DOES BUSINESS**Bio-Dental Technologies Corporation California Bio-Dental Technologies Corporation     *Ryker Dental of Kentucky, Inc. Kentucky The Supply House; Zila Dental Supply     *Integrated Dental Technologies, Inc. California Integrated Dental Technologies, Inc.     Oxycal Laboratories, Incorporated Arizona Oxycal Laboratories, Inc.     **Zila Nutraceuticals, Inc. Arizona Zila Nutraceuticals, Inc.     Zila Acquisition Corp. Delaware Zila Acquisition Corp.     Zila Biotechnology, Inc. Arizona Zila Biotechnology, Inc.     Zila International, Inc. Arizona Zila International, Inc.     Zila Limited United Kingdom Zila Limited     Zila Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Nevada Zila Pharmaceuticals, Inc.     Zila Swab Technologies, Inc. Arizona Innovative Swab Technologies     Zila Technical, Inc. Arizona Zila Technical, Inc.     Zila Technologies, Inc. Arizona Zila Technologies, Inc.
*wholly owned subsidiary ofBio-Dental Technologies Corporation
New Jersey Department of Labor, Workmen’s Compensation Bureau.

#### PATRICK CORRIGAN, PETITIONER, v. CITY OF NEWARK, RESPONDENT.

For the petitioner, *Russell Fleming.*

For the respondent, *John B. Slanard.*

# $ Jjí ;¡? >Js # 5|;

3. That the petitioner was employed by the respondent as a laborer in the division of water for several years past, and that he continued in such employment np to the 14th day of April, 1928, and that his duties consisted of digging up and adjusting water boxes.

4. That petitioner at the time of his injury received for his services wages amounting to sixty-five cents an hour, or $28.60 1'or a five and one-lialf-day week of eight hours a dajr, and was employed under the provisions of the civil service laws of this state.

5. That on the said 14th day of April, 1928, petitioner sustained personal injuries as a result of an accident; that the said accident consisted of an injury to his left eye, caused by a piece of metal which petitioner claims fiew from a water-box he was adjusting on Wilson avenue, Newark, New Jersey, and that petitioner has lost the sight of said eye as a result of said injury.

6. That petitioner’s testimony with respect to the maimer in which he received his injury is without corroboration. The testimony of Charles Yogel, a foreman in the employ of the respondent, and having oversight of the duties of petitioner, is to the effect that on Monday, April 16th, 1928, petitioner reported to him for work but petitioner appeared *774to be intoxicated and unfit for work, and that he was sent home; that petitioner at that time did not mention having received an injury; that petitioner should have been working on Central avenue, Newark, on April 14th, when he claims to have received his injury, and that he did not send him to Wilson avenue as petitioner testified; that the testimony of Tony Delico, a fellow-laborer, corroborates the testimony of Charles Vogel with respect to the failure of petitioner to notify his foreman of the injury sustained on April 14th, and of the condition of the petitioner on Monday, April 16th; Delico further testified that about two weeks after Monday, April 16th, 1928, he was sent by his foreman to the home of petitioner to learn why he did not report for work, and that petitioner then told him that he had a bad eye and would return as soon as his eye got well.

7. That the respondent had no actual knowledge of the occurrence of the alleged injury to petitioner, and that petitioner did not prove by a preponderance of evidence that he had incurred such an injury in the course of his employment.

8. That petitioner was an employe of the city of Newark and as such employe his yearly earnings amounted to more than $1,200 and therefore does not come within the purview of the act referred to in paragraph one, above, respecting municipal employes.

Harry J. Goas, *Deputy Commissioner.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0001007228
<NAME>                                         Matria Healthcare, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                            3,915
<SECURITIES>                                        130
<RECEIVABLES>                                    46,906
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (6,937)
<INVENTORY>                                      17,035
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 93,850
<PP&E>                                           41,025
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (25,381)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  268,293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            42,247
<BONDS>                                          76,996
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            41,446
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                             88
<OTHER-SE>                                       98,762
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    268,293
<SALES>                                          55,391
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                225,767
<CGS>                                            36,193
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   116,179
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,599
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  7,043
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                8,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  22,794
<INCOME-TAX>                                      9,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              13,694
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     13,694
<EPS-BASIC>                                        1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      1.05



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MYR Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William A. Koertner, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

August 10,
2009

/s/ WILLIAM A. KOERTNER Chief Executive Officer and President


---
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending September 20, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending April 19, 2008

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us