alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1446

To amend the Revised Statutes of the United States to promote equity

and fairness in lawsuits brought against State and local law enforcement

officers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 6, 1995

Mr. MOORHEAD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Revised Statutes of the United States to

promote equity and fairness in lawsuits brought against

State and local law enforcement officers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Law Enforcement Offi5 cers Civil Liability Act of 1995’’.
2

•HR 1446 IH

1 SEC. 2. LAWSUITS BROUGHT AGAINST STATE AND LOCAL

2 LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title XXIV of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (42 U.S.C. 1981 et seq.) is

5 amended by adding at the end the following:

6 ‘‘SEC. 1992. (a) In any civil action under Federal law

7 against a law enforcement officer for conduct in the course

8 of official duty, punitive damages shall not be awarded

9 against that officer except to punish or deter conduct—

10 ‘‘(1) specifically intended unlawfully to cause

11 serious personal injury; or

12 ‘‘(2) engaged in with flagrant indifference to

13 the rights of the injured party and with an aware14 ness that such conduct is likely to result in serious

15 personal injury and is unlawful;

16 and shall not, if awarded, exceed $10,000. Such punitive

17 damages may not be awarded except on clear and convinc18 ing evidence of conduct described in paragraph (1) or (2).

19 The indemnification of any such officer, by any person or

20 entity, for any punitive damages paid by that officer sub21 ject to this section shall not in itself create any liability

22 of that person or entity in any civil action.

23 ‘‘(b) In any civil action arising out of the conduct

24 of a law enforcement officer in the course of official duty,

25 in which—

26 ‘‘(1) there is a monetary recovery; and
3

•HR 1446 IH

1 ‘‘(2) attorney’s fees may be awarded under sec2 tion 722 (42 U.S.C. 1988);

3 the amount of attorney’s fees so awarded shall not exceed

4 one third of such monetary recovery.

5 ‘‘(c) As used in this section—

6 ‘‘(1) the term ‘law enforcement officer’

7 means—

8 ‘‘(A) any peace officer;

9 ‘‘(B) a prison or jail guard; or

10 ‘‘(C) any corrections officer;

11 of a State or of any subdivision of a State;

12 ‘‘(2) the term ‘State’ includes the District of

13 Columbia, Puerto Rico, and each other territory and

14 possession of the United States; and

15 ‘‘(3) the term ‘official duty’ includes conduct by

16 an off-duty law enforcement officer in circumstances

17 indicating a law enforcement response.’’.

18 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

19 at the beginning of title XXIV of the Revised Statutes

20 of the United States is amended by adding at the end the

21 following:

‘‘1992. Lawsuits brought against State and local law enforcement officers.’’.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DANIEL GIDDINGS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 253 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16th day of September, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
# C_2013344EN.01005301.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/53

---

Order of the President of the Court of 23 July 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-245/12) (1)

1

2013/C 344/91

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 200, 7.7.2012.

1

---
Exhibit 23



(logo of Williams & Webster, PS)















Board of Directors

Powercold Corporation

La Vernia, Texas









CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED  PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS





We consent to the use of our report dated February 21, 2004 and September 7, 2004 on the financial statements of Powercold Corporation as of December 31, 2003 and the period then ended, and the inclusion of our name under the heading "Experts" in the Form S-1 Registration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





/s/ Williams & Webster, P.S.



Williams & Webster, P.S.

Spokane, Washington



January 10, 2005























Members of Private Companies Practice Section, SEC Practice Section, AICPA and WSCPA

Bank of America Financial Center  601 W. Riverside, Suite 1940  Spokane, WA 99201

Phone (509) 838-5111  Fax (509) 838-5114  www.williams-webster.com
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT  11 -  Computation of Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Three Months Ended
                                                                     March 31,
                                                         ----------------------------------
                                                            1999                    1998
                                                            ----                    ----
<S>                                                      <C>                     <C>
Net income
 (used in basic EPS computation)                         $  335,543              $  304,335
 
Adjustments to net income per
 assumed effect of dilutive securities:
 
  Interest on convertible notes, net of tax effect           16,547                  63,832
                                                         ----------              ----------
 
Adjusted earnings for diluted earnings per
 share computation                                       $  352,090              $  368,167
                                                         ==========              ==========
 
 
Weighted average number of shares
 outstanding for calculating basic earnings
 per share                                                2,007,127               1,676,495
 
Effect of dilutive securities:
  Options and warrants                                       65,018                  55,300
  Convertible notes                                          77,101                 413,517
                                                         ----------              ----------
 
Weighted average number of shares
 outstanding for calculation of diluted
 earnings per share                                       2,149,246               2,145,312
                                                         ==========              ==========
 
Basic earnings per share                                 $     0.17              $     0.22
                                                         ==========              ==========
 
Diluted earnings per share                               $     0.16              $     0.17
                                                         ==========              ==========
 
/(1)/  Anti-dilutive
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report Octillion Corp. (the Company) on the Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harmel S. Rayat, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.  OCTILLION CORP.Date: April 10, 2007By:/s/ Harmel S. RayatHarmel S. Rayat
President and Chief Executive Officer  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

MARGARET A. ROBISON, 

 Case No. 2:15-cv-11725 

Plaintiff, District Judge Avern Cohn 

vs. Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti 

 

WIXOM GRAND RIVER 

ASSOCIATES, L.P., 

Defendant. 

________________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S EX PARTE MOTION TO ALLOW 

OUT OF STATE DESIGNATED CORPORATE REPRESENTATIVE TO 

APPEAR AT SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE VIA TELEPHONE (DE 37)

 Judge Cohn referred this case to me to conduct a settlement conference, which 

is currently scheduled for March 22, 2017. (DEs 33, 34, 36.) Currently before the 

Court is Defendant’s March 14, 2017 ex parte motion to allow the out of state 

designated corporate representative to appear at the settlement conference via 

telephone, which Judge Cohn has referred to me for hearing and determination. 

(DE 37, DE 39.) 

 Upon consideration, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. To be sure, I 

ordinarily do not permit telephonic attendance at a settlement conference. 

Moreover, I agree with Plaintiff that “settlement conferences are more meaningful if 

all representative parties are present[,]” and that “Defendant has failed to offer good 

cause for the granting of this motion.” (DE 38.) Nonetheless, I acknowledge 

2:15-cv-11725-AC-APP Doc # 40 Filed 03/15/17 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 308
2 

Defendant’s assertions that it sold Meadowood Park Apartments on December 16, 

2013 and dissolved its partnership in 2014 - both of which occurred prior to the May 

13, 2015 filing of this lawsuit - and further acknowledge the assertion that its 

authorized representative is located in Florida. (See DE 37 ¶¶ 4-6, DE 1.) The 

Court is not inclined to order the out of state representative of this particular defunct 

corporate entity to appear under these circumstances. Indeed, the Court is inclined 

to preserve whatever limited assets might remain in this defunct entity for use in a 

possible settlement, rather than toward travel expenses. For these reasons, 

Defendant’s authorized representative may appear at the upcoming settlement 

conference via telephone but must remain available throughout the proceeding. 

Plaintiff, Plaintiff’s counsel and defense counsel shall appear in person. 

 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: March 15, 2017 s/Anthony P. Patti 

Anthony P. Patti 

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record 

on March 15, 2017, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail. 

 s/Michael Williams 

 Case Manager for the 

 Honorable Anthony P. Patti 

2:15-cv-11725-AC-APP Doc # 40 Filed 03/15/17 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 309
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending October 27, 2007

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements  for the six  months  ended  June 30,  1999 and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                           1,494
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  139,061
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    19,108
<INVENTORY>                                                    104,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               229,147
<PP&E>                                                          17,279
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   6,173
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 240,253
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          142,049
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                         6,600
<OTHER-SE>                                                      78,604
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   240,253
<SALES>                                                        315,014
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               315,014
<CGS>                                                          209,237
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   63,980
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   680
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 8,445
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               3,250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 38,547
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       680
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             37,867
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    37,867
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     0.01




</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                       7,112,354
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               53,743,698
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 33,847,296
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,086,629
<PP&E>                                      52,867,243
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,676,454
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             182,528,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       40,479,262
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   196,039,793
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               182,528,399
<SALES>                                    133,802,370
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           133,802,370
<CGS>                                       86,350,828
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              110,916,254
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (507,475)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,891,692
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,350,269)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   570,484
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,920,757)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,920,753)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-10-00036-CV

IN RE SMITHTEX, LLP, SMITH PROPERTIES, LLP,

STEVEN F. SMITH, STUART N. R. SMITH, NORMAN L. SMITH

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed February 10, 2010

[OT06]
§ 391.10 Transitional rules for existing funds. ( a ) *In general.* Section 607(j) of the Act provides that any person who was maintaining a fund or funds under section 607 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, prior to its amendment by the Merchant Marine Act of 1970 (for purposes of this part referred to as “old fund”) may continue to maintain such old fund in the same manner as under prior law subject to the limitations contained in section 607(j) of the Act. Thus, a party may not simultaneously maintain such old fund and a new fund established under the Act.
( b ) *Extension of agreement to new fund.* If a person enters into an agreement under the Act to establish a new fund, he may agree to the extension of such agreement to some or all of the amounts in the old fund and transfer the amounts in the old fund to which the agreement is to apply from the old fund to the new fund. If an agreement to establish a new fund is extended to amounts from an old fund, each item in the old fund to which such agreement applies shall be considered to be transferred to the appropriate account in the manner provided for in § 391.8(d) in the new fund in a nontaxable transaction which is in accordance with the provisions of the agreement under which such old fund was maintained. For purposes of determining the amount of interest under section 607(h)(3)(C) of the Act and § 391.7(e), the date of deposit of any item so transferred shall be deemed to be July 1, 1971, or the date of the deposit in the old fund, whichever is the later.
§ 28.535 Inclining test. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, each vessel for which the lightweight displacement and centers of gravity must be determined in order to do the calculations required in this subpart must have an inclining test performed.
( b ) A deadweight survey may be substituted for the inclining test, if there is a record of an inclining test of a sister vessel. A vessel qualifies as a sister vessel if it is built to the same basic drawings and the undocumented weight difference between the two vessels is less than 3 percent of the lightweight displacement of the vessel which was inclined and the location of the longitudinal center of gravity differs less than 1 percent of the vessel's length.
( c ) A deadweight survey may be substituted for the inclining test, or the inclining test may be dispensed with, if an accurate estimate of the vessel's lightweight characteristics can be made and the precise location of the position of the vessel's vertical center of gravity is not necessary to ensure that the vessel has adequate stability in all probable loading conditions.
( d ) ASTM F 1321 (incorporated by reference, see § 28.40), with the exception of Annexes A and B, may be used as guidance for any inclining test or deadweight survey conducted under this section.
[CGD 88-079, 56 FR 40393, Aug. 14, 1991, as amended by USCG-1999-5151, 64 FR 67176, Dec. 1, 1999]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NetSolve, Incorporated (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David D. Hood, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    David D. HoodName: David D. Hood Title: President and Chief Executive Officer




February 12, 2004



|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report of
Merriman Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, D. Jonathan Merriman and William J. Febbo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|April 30, 2015 |                                                      |                         
|-------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------
|               |                                                      | /s/ D. Jonathan Merriman
|               | D. Jonathan Merriman
        Chief Executive Officer





| |                                                      | /s/ William J. Febbo
| | ---------------------------------------------------- | --------------------
| | William J. Febbo
        Principal Financial Officer