alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

JAVEED SYED,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 15-CV-12242

vs.

HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

GATEWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH,

INC. and MICHELLE WELLS,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER DISMISSING SHOW CAUSE [DOC 11]

AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO

SERVE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT UPON DEFENDANTS [DOC 13]

On December 11, 2015, this court issued an order to show cause in the abovecaptioned case, requiring that the plaintiff respond in writing or otherwise show good

cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. On December 23,

2015, plaintiff responded to the court’s show cause order by explaining that he

attempted service by certified mail and the mail was returned to sender. Plaintiff filed a

motion requesting an extension of time to perfect service. 

Plaintiff, proceeding in pro per, filed his complaint in this matter on July 15, 2015. 

The court issued summonses for each defendant on August 19, 2015. On November

10, 2015, plaintiff attempted to serve defendants by certified mail sent to their business

addresses. On December 9, 2015, the United States Postal Service returned the

refused certified envelopes to plaintiff. 

 On December 15, 2015, plaintiff retained legal counsel to represent him in his

employment discrimination lawsuit. Counsel filed this motion in response to the court’s

-1-

2:15-cv-12242-GCS-DRG Doc # 14 Filed 01/04/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 33
order to show cause. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide that “if the plaintiff

shows good cause for the failure” to serve summons within 120 days after filing the

complaint, “the court shall extend the time for service for an appropriate period.” Fed.

R. Civ. P. 4(m). Given the circumstances of this case, the court finds that defendants

will not suffer any prejudice if plaintiff is permitted additional time to serve the summons

and complaint. Now, therefore,

The court hereby DISMISSES its order to show cause and GRANTS plaintiff an

extension of the time limit for service until February 15, 2016. 

SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 4, 2016

s/George Caram Steeh 

 GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

January 4, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marcia Beauchemin

Deputy Clerk

 

-2-

2:15-cv-12242-GCS-DRG Doc # 14 Filed 01/04/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 34
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JAMES CULPEPPER AND

FRANCHELE ADAMS,

Plaintiffs,

v.

DETROIT POLICE OFFICER HAROLD

ROCHON, ET AL.

Defendants.

 /

Case No. 15-12386

Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds

ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO PLAINTIFFS' STATE LAW CLAIM

Plaintiffs James Culpepper and Franchele Adams filed suit against a number of Detroit

Police Officers alleging violations of the United States Constitution and 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Additionally, Plaintiffs have asserted one count of gross negligence under Michigan state

law. 

Seeing as the parties to this matter are non-diverse, this Court declines to exercise

supplemental jurisdiction over the latter claims so as to avoid jury confusion. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1367(c); Moor v. County of Alameda, 411 U.S. 693, 716 (U.S. 1973); Padilla v. City of

Saginaw, 867 F. Supp. 1309 (E.D. Mich. 1994). Thus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c), all

of Plaintiffs' claims based on state law, including Count II, are hereby DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This Court will retain jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' federal claims only.

2:15-cv-12386-NGE-DRG Doc # 5 Filed 07/23/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 52
SO ORDERED

s/Nancy G. Edmunds 

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge

Dated: July 23, 2015

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on July 23, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Carol J. Bethel 

Case Manager

2

2:15-cv-12386-NGE-DRG Doc # 5 Filed 07/23/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 53
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Macromolecular Structure and Function A Study Section, June 4, 2007, 8 a.m. to June 5 2007, 5 p.m., George Washington University Inn, 824 New Hampshire Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20037 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 5, 2007, 72 FR 16804.                

The meeting will be held on June 4, 2007, 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. The meeting location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: May 2, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2295 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### § 30.25-3 Benzene.

The provisions contained in 46 CFR part 197, subpart C, apply to liquid cargoes containing 0.5% or more benzene by volume.

[CGD 88-040, 56 FR 65006, Dec. 13, 1991]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Foreign Claims Settlement Commission 

          - [F.C.S.C. Meeting Notice No. 4-07] 

The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its regulations (45 CFR Part 504) and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of meetings for the transaction of Commission business and other matters specified, as follows: 

# Date and Time: 

Thursday, May 31, 2007, at 1 p.m. 

# Subject Matter: 

Issuance of Proposed Decisions and Amended Proposed Decisions in claims against Albania. 

# Status:

Open. 

                        All meetings are held at the Foreign claims Settlement Commission, 600 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. Requests for information, or advance notices of intention to observe an open meeting, may be directed to: Administrative                               ( print page 28079)                            Officer, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E Street, NW., Room 6002, Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 616-6988.                     

Mauricio J. Tamargo, 

Chairman.

[FR Doc. 07-2503 Filed 5-16-07; 11:26 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410-01-P
#### Emeline Avery, *Respondent, v.*The Village of Saratoga Springs, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.;

Bocees, J., not acting.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Douglas T. Watson, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Digital Video Systems, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this annual report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this annual report;

4. 	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based
on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. 	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial
reporting.

Date: : April 15, 2005

/s/ Douglas T. Watson				
                       Douglas T. Watson 
                   Chief Financial Officer
   (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

---
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.017-21 Approval tests. ( a ) *General.* Each approval test must be conducted on a ladder of the longest length for which approval has been requested. If a ladder fails one of the tests in this section, the cause of the failure must be identified and any needed changes made. After a test failure and any design change, the failed test, and any other previously completed tests affected by the design change, must be rerun.
( b ) *Visual examination.* Before starting the tests described in this section, an assembled chain ladder is examined for evidence of noncompliance with the requirements in §§ 160.017.11, 160.017-13, and 160.017-15.
( c ) The following approval tests must be conducted: ( 1 ) *Strength test #1.* An assembled ladder is supported so that a static load, if placed on any of its steps, would exert a force both on the step and each suspension member. A static load of 315 kg (700 lb.) is then placed on one step for at least one minute. The load must be uniformly distributed over a contact surface that is approximately 100 mm (4 in.) wide. The center of the contact surface must be at the center of the step. This test is performed on six different steps. No step may break, crack, or incur any deformation that remains after the static load is removed. No attachment between any step and a suspension member may loosen or break during this test.
( 2 ) *Strength test #2.* A ladder is suspended vertically to its full length from its top lashing rings. A static load of 900 kg (2000 lbs.) is then applied to the bottom lashing rings so that it is distributed equally between the suspension members. The suspension members, lashing rings, and spacer ears must not break, incur any elongation or deformation that remains after the test load is removed, or be damaged in any other way during this test.
( 3 ) *Strength test #3.* A rolled-up ladder is attached by its top lashing rings to anchoring fixtures in a location away from any wall or structure that would prevent it from falling freely, and where it can hang to its full length vertically. The ladder when dropped must unroll freely. When unrolling the ladder, its steps and attachments must not become cracked, broken, or loosened. Other similar damage making the ladder unsafe to use must likewise not occur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case Number: 15-cr-20180 

 v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

 Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris 

JERMARRIS RUSSELL, 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING 

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA 

AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT 

On July 23, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris conducted a plea 

hearing pursuant to Defendant’s consent. The Magistrate Judge issued her report on that same 

day, recommending that this Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty. 

Although the Magistrate Judge’s report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may 

object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, 

neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the 

Magistrate Judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and 

recommendation waives any further right to appeal. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation 

(ECF No. 19) is ADOPTED. 

 It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s plea of guilty is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 

Plea Agreement (ECF No. 18) is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT. 

Dated: August 13, 2015 s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

1:15-cr-20180-TLL-PTM Doc # 21 Filed 08/13/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 83
PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on August 13, 2015. 

 s/Karri Sandusky 

 Karri Sandusky, Acting Case Manager 

1:15-cr-20180-TLL-PTM Doc # 21 Filed 08/13/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 84
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 57 (Monday, March 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14165-14166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1475]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2007-12]


Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 14166]]

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief 
from specific requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this notice is to 
improve the public's awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of 
the FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor 
the inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to 
affect the legal status of the petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on petitions received must identify the petition docket 
number involved and must be received on or before April 16, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on the petition to the Docket Management 
System, U.S. Department of Transportation, Room Plaza 401, 400 Seventh 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001. You must identify the docket 
number FAA-2007-27562 at the beginning of your comments. If you wish to 
receive confirmation that the FAA received your comments, include a 
self-addressed, stamped postcard.
    You may also submit comments through the Internet to http://dms.dot.gov. You may review the public docket containing the petition, 
any comments received, and any final disposition in person in the 
Dockets Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
Federal holidays. The Dockets Office (telephone 1-800-647-5527) is on 
the plaza level of the NASSIF Building at the Department of 
Transportation at the above address. Also, you may review public 
dockets on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Boylon, ANM-113 (425-227-1152), 
Federal Aviation Administration, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 
98057-3356 (for Dassault Aviation), or Frances Shaver, (202-267-9681), 
Office of Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal Aviation Administration, 800 
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 19, 2007.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.

    Docket No.: FAA-2007-27562.
    Petitioner: Dassault Aviation.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 25.981(a)(3).
    Description of Relief Sought: Dassault Aviation is seeking an 
exemption from Sec.  25.981(a)(3) regarding the structural lightning 
protection of wing fasteners on Dassault Falcon 7X airplanes.

[FR Doc. 07-1475 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
<PAGE>
                          CENTRAL FEDERAL CORPORATION

                                  Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Central Federal Corporation (the
"Corporation") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David C. Vernon, Chairman, President and CEO of the Corporation, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Corporation.


Dated:  November 14, 2003             By:  /s/ David C. Vernon
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           David C. Vernon
                                           Chairman, President and CEO
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)









-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                       23
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2325 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1300 Matamoros Street in Laredo, Texas, 

as the ‘‘Laredo Veterans Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2325 EH

1 SECTION 1. LAREDO VETERANS POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 1300 Matamoros Street in La4 redo, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘La5 redo Veterans Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Laredo Veterans Post 

10 Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 15, 2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2325 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postfice’’. Laredo, Texas, as the ‘‘Laredo Veterans Post Of- al Service located at 1300 Matamoros Street in
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00435

- CV

M.A. M ORTENSON C OMPANY

, Appellant

V

.

J AMES M. S HELTON , Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 271st District

Court

of Wis e County ( CV14

- 04

- 241 )

June 3, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice

Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant M.A. Mortenson Company shall pay all of

the cost s of this appea l, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

__ /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

_______________ Chief Justic e Bonnie Sudderth
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending July 8, 2006

|Filer                           | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|EAST PENN FINANCIAL CORPORATION | * 3A3         | East Penn Financial Corporation, Emmaus, PA, to acquire up to 19.9% of Berkshire Bancorp, Inc., Wyomissing, PA. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:07/10/2006
|Newspaper:                      | Not available
|Federal Register:               | 07/10/2006   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us