alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending March 24, 2007

|Filer                 | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  | End of Comment Period                             
|--------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|LEA M. MCMULLAN TRUST | * 3A5* 3A3    | Lea M. McMullan Trust, Shelbyville, Kentucky, to indirectly acquire 100 percent of Fort Knox National Bancorp, Inc., Radcliff, Kentucky, and thereby indirectly acquire Fort Knox National Bank, Radcliff, Kentucky. Also a companion filing for Citizens Union Bancorp of Shelbyville, Inc., Shelbyville, Kentucky, to acquire 100 percent of Fort Knox National Bancorp, Inc., Radcliff, Kentucky, and thereby indirectly acquire Fort Knox National Bank, Radcliff, Kentucky. | Newspaper:04/23/2007Federal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:            | 04/23/2007   
|Federal Register:     | Not available

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Mike L. Wilhelms, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Triad FinancialCorporation, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Triad Financial Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c. Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the company’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.       /s/ Mike L. Wilhelms     Mike L. Wilhelms    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer       Dated: August 11, 2006
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending September 13, 2008

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                                 
|----------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------
|COMERICA BANK     | * Branch       | Comerica Bank, Dallas, Texas, to establish a branch to be located at 1301 E. 14th Street, San Leandro, California 94577. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | Not available 
|Federal Register: | Not applicable
|SOUTHWEST BANK    | * Branch       | Southwest Bank, Fort Worth, Texas, to establish a branch at 3707 Camp Bowie, Fort Worth, Texas 76107.                    | Newspaper:09/10/2008Federal Register:Not applicable   
|Newspaper:        | 09/10/2008    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

* Subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Albert Bennett v. The State.

*No. 2748.*

*Decided January 22.*

Theft—Charge of the Court—Fact Case.—Article 738 of the Penal Code provides: “If property, taken under such circumstances as to constitute theft, be voluntarily returned within a reasonable time, and before any prosecution is commenced therefor, the punishment shall be by fine not exceeding one thousand dollars.” If the-evidence on a trial for theft shows such a return of the stolen property to the owner, the failure of the trial court to give the provisions of the said article in charge to the-jury is fundamental error. But see the opinion for the substance of evidence *held*in any event insufficient to support a conviction for theft.

Appeal from the District Court of San Saba. Tried below before Hon. A. W. Moursund.

The opinion discloses the nature of the case. The penalty assessed against the appellant was a term of two years in the penitentiary.

*Leigh Burleson,*for appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

“If property, taken under such circumstances as to-constitute theft, be voluntarily returned within a reasonable time, and before any prosecution is commenced therefor, the punishment shall be by fine not exceeding one thousand dollars.” Penal Code., art. 738.

It appeared from the evidence that a few days after the defendant discovered that the cow in question was claimed by Sanderson, the owner,, and before any prosecution had been commenced for the theft of said cow,, he returned said cow into said Sanderson’s possession. This being the-evidence, the above quoted provision of the code was a part of the law of the case, and it was the imperative duty of the judge to give it in charge to the jury, whether requested or not by the defendant. Anderson v. The State, 25 Texas Ct. App., 593; Guest v. The State, 24 Texas Ct. App., 530; Willson’s Crim. Stats., sec. 1287. Such charge was not given, and the-failure to give it vitiates the conviction.

We will say further that we could not permit this conviction to stand had such charge been given, because in our judgment it is not warranted, by the evidence. There was no *actual*taking of the cow by defendant-*343He sold cattle in the same mark and brand of said cow, which cattle were gathered from the range by the person to whom he sold, and among those so gathered was the cow in question.. Defendant did not see the cow or know that she had been taken until he learned that Sanderson claimed her, and when he learned that it was Sanderson's cow he returned her to him. It is apparent to our minds from the evidence before us that the cow was taken through mistake, and that the defendant did not fraudulently take her, nor fraudulently cause her to be taken. A new trial should have been granted the defendant because the verdict was not supported by but was contrary to the evidence.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*

Hurt, J., absent.
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Atrion Corporation (the
“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
      November 7, 2008
                /s/
      JefferyStricklandJeffery
      StricklandChief
      Financial Officer








The
foregoing certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and not
for any other purpose.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-0736

_____________________________

JUSTIN MARTINEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel—

Original Jurisdiction.

September 11, 2019

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(6)(C).

B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Justin Martinez, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
§ 46.10-50 Drills and inspections. ( a ) For the required drills and inspections to be conducted on passenger vessels, see subpart 78.17 of subchapter H (Passenger Vessels) of this chapter.
#### § 47.600 Description of service.

This subpart applies to deck cargo barges operating in International and Great Lakes service and meeting the conditions of assignment in § 47.610 of this subpart.
Argued and submitted December 8, 1995,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration January 17, 1996

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of James M. King, Claimant. James M. KING, *Petitioner, v.*BUILDING SUPPLY DISCOUNT and SAIF Corporation, *Respondents.*

(WCB 93-06873; CA A84940)

909 P2d 901

Michael A. Gilbertson argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Steve Cotton, Special Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Hasel-ton, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. *King v. Building Supply Discount,*133 Or App 179, 889 P2d 1310 (1995).
UNITED STATES

Pat Smith, Assistant Library Director

Monticello Library

80 North Main Street

Monticello, UT 84535

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

October 15, 2014

Subject: Request to retain public documents at the Monticello Library for public inspec ion

Dear Ms. Smith:

The purpose of this letter is to request that the Monticello Library retain the enclosed documents at the

library for at least sixty (60) days for public inspection. These documents are the U. S. Environmental

Protection Agency’s preliminary decision for the proposed Clean Air Act Prevention of Significant

Deterioration amendment permit for the McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility on the Navajo

Nation Indian Reservation near the city ofAneth, San Juan County, Utah. These documents are

currently available for public comment.

Please contact me at (415) 947-4156 or keIly.shaheerah(~iepa.gov if you have any questions.

Permits Office

Air Division

Environmental Engineer

Enclosures
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 (the “Report”), as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Rick Berry,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.  The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

3.  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  RICK BERRY    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Rick Berry              |
| Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |
|                    |
| May 12, 2003            |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. and will be retained bySanders Morris Harris Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
exhibit  3.4

**CERTIFICATE ELIMINATING****REFERENCE TO A SERIES****OF SHARES OF STOCK FROM  THE****CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION****OF****AURA SYSTEMS, INC.**

 Pursuant to the  provisions of Section 151(g) of the Delaware General Corporation Law, Aura Systems,  Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "**Corporation**") hereby certifies that:

 1. The name  of the corporation is AURA SYSTEMS, INC.

 2. The designation  of the series of shares of stock of the Corporation to which this certificate  relates is that certain Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock of the  Corporation which was authorized by the Board of Directors of the Corporation  pursuant to that certain Certificate of Designations of Series A Convertible  Redeemable Preferred Stock of the Company dated March 4, 2002 and filed March  5, 2002 with the Delaware Secretary of State ("**2002 Series A Designation**").

 3. The voting  powers, designations, preferences, and the relative, participating, optional,  or other rights, and the qualifications, limitations, and restrictions of the  Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock issuable pursuant to the 2002  Series A Preferred Designation were provided for by the 2002 Series A Designation.

 4. The Board  of Directors of the Corporation has adopted the following resolutions: 

 "RESOLVED, that  none of the Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock issuable pursuant  to the 2002 Series A Preferred Designation is outstanding, and

 FURTHER RESOLVED,  that none of the Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock issuable pursuant  to the 2002 Series A Preferred Designation will be issued, 

 FURTHER RESOLVED, the Board  believes that it is in the best interests of the  Company to eliminate any reference to the 2002 Series A Designation in the  Company's Certificate of Incorporation; and

 FURTHER RESOLVED,  that the proper officers of the Corporation be and hereby are authorized and  directed to file a certificate setting forth this resolution with the Secretary  of State of the State of Delaware pursuant to the provisions of Section 151(g)  of the Delaware General Corporation Law for the purpose of eliminating from  the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation all reference to the Series  A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock issuable pursuant to the 2002 Series  A Designation."

**IN WITNESS  WHEREOF**, the Corporation has caused this Certificate Eliminating Reference  to a Series of Shares of Stock from the Certificate of Incorporation of the  Corporation to be signed on this ___ day of __________, 2004

  _____________________________________

 By:

 Name:

 Title:
Exhibit 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY OF EDS DIRECTOR

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned Director
of Electronic Data Systems Corporation, a Delaware corporation, which will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, an Annual Report for 2006 on Form 10-K,
hereby constitutes and appoints Michael H. Jordan, Jeffrey M. Heller, Ronald P. Vargo and Storrow M. Gordon his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power to act without the others, to execute such Form 10-K and any and all
amendments thereto on behalf of the undersigned in the capacity indicated.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of
Attorney effective as of February 6, 2007.



/S/ W. ROY DUNBARDirector/S/ ROGER A. ENRICODirector/S/ MARTIN C. FAGADirector/S/ S. MALCOLM GILLISDirector/S/ RAY J. GROVESDirector/S/ ELLEN M. HANCOCKDirector/S/ JEFFREY M. HELLERDirector/S/ RAY L. HUNTDirector/S/ EDWARD A. KANGASDirector/S/ JAMES K. SIMSDirector/S/ R. DAVID YOSTDirector
§ 385.38 Joint funding. ( a ) Pursuant to section 10(c) of the Act, MarAd is authorized to participate in joint funded projects with other Federal agencies in any funding relationship which will serve the best interest of all of the participating agencies' program. Such joint funding project may include more than one type of assistance relationship, e.g., some components of project may be funded by grants and other components of the project may be funded by cooperative agreements.
( b ) It is MarAd's positive policy, further, to encourage cost-sharing on the part of applicants for financial assistance. The willingness of applicants to cost-share is a primary factor in making, or not making, an assistance award.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of L.A.M. Pharmaceutical Corp.
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Joseph T. Slechta,
the President, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects the financial condition and results of the
Company. By:
    /s/ Joseph T. SlechtaJoseph T. Slechta, President, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Principal Financial
Officer August 12, 2004
§ 169.615 Diesel fuel systems. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) each diesel fuel system must meet the requirements of § 56.50-75 of this chapter.
( b ) Each vessel of 65 feet and under must meet the requirements of §§ 182.20-22, 182.20-25, 182,20-30, 182.20-35 and 182.20-40 of this chapter.
ACCEPTED

06-14-00085-CV

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

3/3/2015 9:03:24 AM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 3/3/2015 9:03:24 AM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk