28524 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 97 / Monday, May 21, 2007 / Notices 

seeking authorization) is required to 

establish annually that its Longshore 

Act obligations are fully secured either 

through an applicable state guaranty (or 

analogous) fund, a deposit of security 

with the Division of Longshore and 

Harbor Workers’ Compensation 

(DLHWC), or a combination of both. 

Similarly, each authorized self-insurer 

(or employer seeking authorization) is 

required to fully secure its Longshore 

Act obligations by depositing security 

with DLHWC. These requirements are 

designed to assure the prompt and 

continued payment of compensation 

and other benefits by the responsible 

carrier or self-insurer to injured workers 

and their survivors. 

Forms collect information used for 

determining appropriate security 

deposit amounts and insuring 

compliance with the security deposit 

requirements are described below. 

LS–276, Application for Security 

Deposit Determination. Each currently 

authorized carrier and any carrier 

seeking such authorization must apply 

annually for a determination of the 

amount of security it must deposit with 

DLHWC by completing Form LS–276. 

DLHWC will use the information 

collected on Form LS–276 to determine 

the required security deposit amount for 

each carrier in light of the applicable 

state guaranty fund coverage. 

Regulations establishing this 

requirement are set forth at 20 CFR 

703.2, 703.203, 703.209, 703.210, and 

703.212. 

LS–275 IC, Agreement and 

Undertaking (Insurance Carrier); LS–275 

SI, Agreement and Undertaking (SelfInsured Employer). After DLHWC 

determines the amount of the required 

security deposit, the insurance carrier or 

self-insured employer executes Form 

LS–275 IC or LS–275 SI, respectively, 

to: (1) Report the security it has 

deposited and grant the Department a 

security interest in the collateral; (2) 

agree to abide by the Department’s rules; 

and (3) authorize the Department to 

bring suit on any deposited indemnity 

bond, draw upon any deposited letters 

of credit, or to collect the interest and 

principal or sell any deposited 

negotiable securities when it deems it 

necessary to assure the carrier’s or selfinsurer’s prompt payment of 

compensation and any other Longshore 

Act obligations it has. DLHWC reviews 

the information collected and verifies 

that the carrier or self-insurer has 

deposited the correct amount of 

security. DLHWC uses this information 

if it takes action on the security 

deposited to assure that the carrier or 

self-insurer meets its Longshore Act 

obligations. Regulations establishing 

these requirements are set forth at 20 

CFR 703.2, 703.204, 703.205, 703.303 

and 703.304. 

Darrin A. King, 

Acting Departmental Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. E7–9694 Filed 5–18–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–CF–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

YouthBuild; Solicitation for Grant 

Applications (SGA); SGA/DFA–PY 06–

08 Amendment No. 1 

AGENCY: Employment and Training 

Administration (ETA), Labor. 

ACTION: Amendment. 

SUMMARY: The Employment and 

Training Administration published a 

document in the Federal Register of 

April 26, 2007, announcing the 

availability of funds and solicitation for 

grant applications for YouthBuild 

Grants to provide disadvantaged youth 

with the education and employment 

skills for meaningful work and service 

to their communities. The document is 

hereby amended. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Donna Kelly, Grants Management 

Specialist, Telephone (202) 693–3934. 

Amendment 

In the Federal Register of April 26, 

2007, in FR Volume 72, Number 80: 

1. On page 20877, starting in the 

middle column, the question ‘‘Can a 

National or Regional Organization 

Apply to Serve Multiple Urban or Rural 

Communities?’’ and its answer is now 

deleted from the solicitation. 

The solicitation is amended to add the 

following question: Can I Apply For 

Multiple Towns in One Application? If 

a town is large enough to reasonably 

support a YouthBuild program, the 

grant activities should generally be 

focused on one town. If the applicant 

determines that the town is not large 

enough to support a YouthBuild 

program, it may include additional 

towns and provide justification for the 

larger service area. If multiple towns are 

included together in the application, 

applicants must limit the total requested 

grant amount to $1.1 million. 

2. On page 20878, in the middle 

column, Part III. (A) Eligible Applicants, 

it states the following: An organization 

is an eligible applicant for these grants 

if it is a public or private nonprofit 

agency or organization (including a 

consortium of such agencies or 

organizations with a designated lead 

applicant), including: 

The solicitation is amended to read: 

An organization is an eligible applicant 

for these grants if it is a public or private 

nonprofit agency or organization 

(including a consortium of such 

agencies or organizations with a 

designated lead applicant), including, 

but not limited to: 

3. On page 20878, in the left column, 

under Section I.D, ‘‘What Are Allowable 

Uses of Grant Funds’’? (13), it states the 

following: Equipment, and/or supplies 

related to the YouthBuild activities 

funded through this grant are an 

allowable use of funds. 

The solicitation is amended to add the 

following statement: The Department of 

Labor interprets this to mean that the 

purchase of construction materials to be 

used for houses as part of the training 

for YouthBuild participants would be an 

allowable use of grant funds. 

4. On page 20878, in the right column, 

Section III.C. Matching Funds and 

Leveraged Resources. The solicitation is 

amended to add the following 

statement: Construction materials that 

are acquired without grant funds and 

are used for houses as part of the 

training for YouthBuild participants 

may be used in fulfilling the 25 percent 

match requirement. The match may be 

cash or in-kind resources and must meet 

all the requirements in accordance with 

the applicable Federal cost principles. 

5. YouthBuild ‘‘Frequently Asked 

Questions (FAQs)’’ will be posted on the 

Department of Labor, Employment & 

Training Administration, Youth 

Services Web site and may be accessed 

at http://www.doleta.gov/ 

youth_services/YouthBuild.cfm. The 

FAQs may be updated during the life of 

the competition. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of 

May, 2007. 

Eric Luetkenhaus, 

Grant Officer, Employment & Training 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–9654 Filed 5–18–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FT–P 

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION 

ADMINISTRATION 

Notice of Meeting 

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Thursday, 

May 24, 2007. 

Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 

7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 

22314–3428. 

Status: Open. 

Matters to be Considered: 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 97 / Monday, May 21, 2007 / Notices 28525 

1. Proposed Rule: Section 701.2 of 

NCUA’s Rules and Regulations, Federal 

Credit Union Bylaws. 

2. Proposed Rule: Interpretive Ruling 

and Policy Statement (IRPS) 07–1, 

Section 701.1 of NCUA’s Rules and 

Regulations, Amendments to NCUA’s 

Chartering and Field of Membership 

Policies. 

3. Final Rule: Part 701 of NCUA’s 

Rules and Regulations, Technical 

Amendments. 

Recess: 11:15 a.m. 

Time and Date: 11:30 a.m., Thursday, 

May 24, 2007. 

Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 

7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 

22314–3428. 

Status: Closed. 

Matters to be Considered: 

1. Action under Section 205 of the 

Federal Credit Union Act. Closed 

pursuant to Exemptions (6), (7), and (8). 

For Further Information Contact: 

Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, 

Telephone: 703–518–6304. 

Mary Rupp, 

Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 07–2548 Filed 5–17–07; 2:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 7535–01–M 

THE NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE 

ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES 

Meetings of Humanities Panel 

AGENCY: The National Endowment for 

the Humanities. 

ACTION: Notice of meetings. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of 

the Federal Advisory Committee Act 

(Pub. L. 92–463, as amended), notice is 

hereby given that the following 

meetings of Humanities Panels will be 

held at the Old Post Office, 1100 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20506. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Heather C. Gottry, Acting Advisory 

Committee Management Officer, 

National Endowment for the 

Humanities, Washington, DC 20506; 

telephone (202) 606–8322. Hearingimpaired individuals are advised that 

information on this matter may be 

obtained by contacting the 

Endowment’s TDD terminal on (202) 

606–8282. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

proposed meetings are for the purpose 

of panel review, discussion, evaluation 

and recommendation on applications 

for financial assistance under the 

National Foundation on the Arts and the 

Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, 

including discussion of information 

given in confidence to the agency by the 

grant applicants. Because the proposed 

meetings will consider information that 

is likely to disclose trade secrets and 

commercial or financial information 

obtained from a person and privileged 

or confidential and/or information of a 

personal nature the disclosure of which 

would constitute a clearly unwarranted 

invasion of personal privacy, pursuant 

to authority granted me by the 

Chairman’s Delegation of Authority to 

Close Advisory Committee meetings, 

dated July 19, 1993, I have determined 

that these meetings will be closed to the 

public pursuant to subsections (c) (4), 

and (6) of section 552b of Title 5, United 

States Code. 

1. Date: June 1, 2007. 

Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

Room: 415. 

Program: This meeting will review 

applications for The IMLS/NEH Digital 

Partnership Advancing Knowledge I, 

submitted to the Division of 

Preservation and Access, at the March 

27, 2007 deadline. 

2. Date: June 12, 2007. 

Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

Room: 415. 

Program: This meeting will review 

applications for The IMLS/NEH Digital 

Partnership Advancing Knowledge II, 

submitted to the Division of 

Preservation and Access, at the March 

27, 2007 deadline. 

Heather C. Gottry, 

Acting Advisory Committee, Management 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. E7–9717 Filed 5–18–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7536–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. 50–346, 50–440, 50–334, and 

50–412; License Nos. NPF–3, NPF–58, DPR–

66, NPF–73; EA 07–123] 

In the Matter of First Energy Nuclear 

Operating Company—Davis-Besse 

Nuclear Power Plant, Perry Nuclear 

Power Plant, and Beaver Valley 

Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2; Demand 

for Information 

I 

FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating 

Company (FENOC or licensee) is the 

holder of four NRC Facility Operating 

Licenses issued by the U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission (NRC or 

Commission) pursuant to 10 CFR part 

50, which authorizes the operation of 

the specifically named facilities in 

accordance with the conditions 

specified in each license. License No. 

NPF–3 was issued on April 22, 1977, to 

operate the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power 

Station (Davis-Besse). License No. NPF–

58 was issued on November 13, 1986, to 

operate the Perry Nuclear Power Plant. 

Licenses No. DPR–66 and NPF–73 to 

operate the Beaver Valley Nuclear Plant, 

Units 1 and 2 were issued on July 2, 

1976, and August 14,1987, respectively. 

The facilities are located on the 

licensee’s properties near Toledo and 

Painesville, Ohio, for the Davis-Besse 

and Perry Plants, respectively, and near 

McCandless, Pennsylvania, for the 

Beaver Valley Nuclear Plant. 

II 

On March 8, 2004, the NRC issued a 

Confirmatory Order to FENOC and 

approved restart of the Davis-Besse 

Plant following substantial licensee 

action to evaluate and develop 

appropriate corrective actions for the 

technical and programmatic issues that 

were associated with the 2002 reactor 

pressure vessel head degradation event. 

On April 21, 2005, the NRC issued a 

Notice of Violation and Proposed 

Imposition of Civil Penalties in the 

amount of 5,450,000 dollars involving 

violations associated with the 2002 

Davis-Besse reactor pressure vessel head 

degradation event and the root causes 

for the event. On September 14, 2005, 

FENOC responded to the Notice of 

Violation, paid the proposed civil 

penalty and addressed each of the 

violations cited. Its response also 

addressed FENOC’s assessment of the 

root cause for each violation. On 

January 23, 2006, FENOC provided a 

supplemental reply to the Notice of 

Violation. 

FENOC obtained a report from its 

contractor, Exponent Failure Analysis 

Associates and Altran Solutions 

Corporations (Exponent), dated 

December 2006, prepared in connection 

with its claim against Nuclear Electric 

Insurance Limited (NEIL), which 

included an updated analysis of the 

timeline and root cause for the 2002 

Davis-Besse reactor pressure vessel head 

degradation event. A significant 

conclusion of this analysis was a 

determination by Exponent that the time 

period between the beginning of 

substantial leakage from the reactor 

pressure vessel head nozzle causing the 

development of the large cavity next to 

the nozzle may have been as short as 

four months. Previously, FENOC had 

conducted its own technical and 

programmatic root cause evaluations of 

the event and concluded that the reactor 

pressure vessel head cavity was the 

result of ongoing nozzle leakage which 

had gone undetected for more than four 

years. FENOC also obtained a second 

report, dated in December 2006, from 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES