alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
4.7


 


Retention
award – Mr John E Hooper


 





















 


	
  May 2004

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  John Hooper

  
	
  Acting EGM Corporate &
  Institutional Banking

  
	
  Level 35, 500 Bourke Street

  
	
  MELBOURNE   VIC   3000

  



 


 


Dear


 


First of all, I would like to thank you for all
your help and support over the last few months. 
Now that the dust has settled, I have been able to turn my mind towards
ensuring that you are properly rewarded for the extra responsibilities that you
have taken on.  I am pleased to advise
you of the following remuneration arrangements.


 


Share Award


 


Subject to the criteria outlined below, you
will be entitled to a National share award of 60% of your current TEC.  This equates to $240,000.


 


•      20%
of this award will be used to purchase shares with immediate effect.


 


•                  30% of this award will be used to purchase
shares upon the appointment of an incumbent to the position you are acting
in.  This would also apply if you were
the successful candidate.


 


•                  50% of this award will be used to purchase
shares six months after a permanent appointment has been made.  This amount will be subject to your
co-operation in the handover process.  If
you are appointed to the role you will still be entitled to the shares under
this tranche.


 


The shares will be purchased on a pre-tax basis
at a price equal to the average of the closing prices for the five days
immediately following the date of this letter.


 


You will be entitled to receive any dividends
that are paid by the National while the shares remain in trust.


 


The earliest you can apply to have the shares
released is six months after a permanent appointment has been made to the
position.  The shares may remain in trust
on a tax-deferred basis for up to ten years from the date of issue(1).


 


Current Year Incentive
Opportunity (FY’04)


 


For the current incentive year, you will have
your opportunity increased on a pro-rated basis to that of the previous
incumbent, ie a target percentage of $490,000 for the second half of this
year.  Any payment of the incentive would
continue to remain subject to your achieving the performance objectives of your
previous position and the new position over the year.


 


All other terms and conditions of your current
employment agreement remain the same.


 


I look forward to your ongoing support and
diligence during this challenging period for the National Group and would thank
you once again for your support to date.


 


Regards


 


 










(1) While the shares remain in trust they will be
subject to forfeiture on serious misconduct only.
§ 385.8 Arrangement. ( a ) *General Plan.* The general format, numbering system, and nomenclature used in this part conform with Federal Register standards.
( b ) *Citation.* The MarAd assistance regulations will be cited in accordance with Federal Register standards. Thus, this paragraph, when referred to within divisions of the MarAd assistance regulations, should be cited as “§ 385.8(b).” When this section is referred to formally in other documents outside of this part, it should be cited as “46 CFR 385.8(b).”
( c ) *Implementation.* Instructions and procedures needed by MarAd to internally implement this part will be contained in a separate MarAd Financial Assistance Manual, which will be available to the public upon request.
§ 36.20-5 Ventilation of pumproom—TB/ALL. ( a ) Where personnel are required to enter pumprooms located below the weather deck under normal circumstances of handling cargo, such pumprooms shall be equipped with power ventilation.
( b ) [Reserved]
Petition for blanket flight under section 333 exemptions and regulations

John Sneed – Nissan North America 

983 Nissan Dr. Smyrna Tennessee 37167

- Flight will be at or below the 200 ft flight ceiling and within line of sight to 

maintain proper safety protocols. 

- The company will be saving man hours and keeping the hazards of walking 

on the roof to a minimum.

- The company will be preforming thermal and visual scans of our facility.

- Make of craft – Yuneec 

- Model of craft - Typhoon Q500
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on March 20, 2007, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Southwest Research Institute (“SwRI”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: Ametek/Process & Analytical, Pittsburgh, PA; Gas Processors Association, Tulsa, OK; Michell Instruments Inc., Danbury, CT; and Pipeline Research Council International, Inc., Arlington, VA. The general area of SwRI's planned activity is to evaluate existing instruments to objectively measure hydrocarbon dew points in natural gas. Emphasis will be placed on accuracy, repeatability, and response time of hydrocarbon dew point measurements. This project is proposed to resolve technical issues associated with the determination of natural gas quality by the industry.

Membership in this research group remains open, and the participants intend to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership or planned activities.

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operating, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 07-1870 Filed 4-13-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 12.811 Restrictions. ( a ) An MMC issued to a non-resident alien under this subpart authorizes service only in the steward's department of the U.S. flag large passenger vessel(s), that is/are under the same common ownership and control as the foreign flag passenger vessel(s) on which the non-resident alien served to meet the requirements of § 12.807(a) of this subpart. ( 1 ) The MMC will be endorsed for service in the steward's department, in accordance with § 12.703 of this part.
( 2 ) The MMC may also be endorsed for service as a food handler if the applicant meets the requirements of § 12.703 of this part.
( 3 ) No other rating or endorsement is authorized, except lifeboatman or lifeboatman-limited, in which case all applicable requirements of this subchapter and the STCW Convention and STCW Code (incorporated by reference, see § 12.103 of this part) must be met.
( b ) The following restrictions must be printed on the MMC, or be listed in an accompanying Coast Guard letter, or both: ( 1 ) The name and official number of all U.S. flag vessels on which the non-resident alien may serve. Service is not authorized on any other U.S. flag vessel.
( 2 ) Upon issuance, the MMC must remain in the custody of the employer at all times.
( 3 ) Upon termination of employment, the MMC must be returned to the Coast Guard within 10 days, in accordance with § 12.805 of this subpart.
( 4 ) A non-resident alien issued an MMC under this subpart may not perform watchstanding, engine room duty watch, or vessel navigation functions.
( 5 ) A non-resident alien issued an MMC under this subpart may perform emergency-related duties, provided that— ( i ) The emergency-related duties do not require any other rating or endorsement, except lifeboatman or lifeboatman-limited as specified in paragraph (a)(3) of this section;
( ii ) The non-resident alien has completed familiarization and basic training (BT), as required in § 15.1105 of this subchapter;
( iii ) If the non-resident alien serves as a lifeboatman or lifeboatman-limited, he or she has the necessary lifeboatman or lifeboatman-limited endorsement; and
( iv ) The non-resident alien has completed the training for crewmembers on passenger ships performing duties involving safety or care for passengers, as required in § 15.1103 of this subchapter.
( c ) A non-resident alien may only serve for an aggregate period of 36 months of actual service on all authorized U.S. flag large passenger vessels combined under the provisions of this subpart.
( d ) Once this 36-month limitation is reached, the MMC becomes invalid and must be returned to the Coast Guard under § 12.805(d) of this subpart, and the non-resident alien is no longer authorized to serve in a position requiring an MMC on any U.S. flag large passenger vessel.
( e ) An individual who successfully adjusts his or her immigration status to become either an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence to the United States, or a citizen of the United States, may apply for an MMC, subject to the requirements of § 10.221 of this subchapter, without any restrictions or limitations imposed by this subpart.
September 8, 2015

Dear Mr. Masterson:

This letter is to inform y ou that the following informati on is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA-2015-2348). This informati on is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture a nd Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove clos ed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information desc ribed above by 9/22/15. If we do not receive the information, we will close the doc ket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4712.

Sincerely,

/s/
Brenda Robeson Program Analyst
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
Data Series 528
EAARL Coastal       Topography�Eastern Florida, Post-Hurricane Frances, 2004: Bare       Earth
Collaborators

Funding for this project was provided by       the U.S. Geological Survey - Coastal and Marine       Geology Program.

U.S. Geological Survey

St. Petersburg Coastal and             Marine Science Center

National Aeronautics             and Space Administration

Wallops Flight Facility

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey URL: pubs.usgs.gov /ds/528/html/collaborators.htmlPage Contact Information: FeedbackPage Last Modified: Monday, 30-Aug-2010 10:57:31 EDT
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending September 2, 2006

|Filer                     | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------
|LAFAYETTE AMBASSADOR BANK | * Branch       | Lafayette Ambassador Bank, Easton, PA, to establish a branch office located at the intersections of North Third Street and East Landis Street, Borough of Coopersburg, Lehigh County, PA.                          | Newspaper:09/11/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                | 09/11/2006    
|Federal Register:         | Not applicable
|ORRSTOWN BANK             | Premises* 18C  | Orrstown Bank, Shippensburg, PA, to establish a branch by purchasing the assets and assuming the liabilities of a branch of Omega Bank, State College, PA, located at 1110 East Simpson Street, Mechanicsburg, PA. | Newspaper:09/21/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                | 09/21/2006    
|Federal Register:         | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                    | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|----------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|LANDMARK CMNTY BK, PITTSTON, PENNSYLVANIA | 2963547 | 03/27/2006 | 08/24/2006     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 32.56-5 General—T/ALL. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, each category A machinery space must be aft of the cargo area and pumprooms.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section, each accommodation space, service space except isolated storage spaces, and control space and each main cargo control station must be aft of: ( 1 ) The cargo area;
( 2 ) All cargo pumprooms; and
( 3 ) All cofferdams that isolate the cargo area from category A machinery spaces.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, any pumproom may be recessed below accommodation, service, and control spaces and recessed into any category A machinery space if the distance between the deckhead of the recess and the underside of the accommodation, service, or control space is at least equal to the height of the recess.
( d ) Accommodation, service, control and certain machinery spaces, such as spaces for bow thrusters, windlass, and emergency fire pumps, may be located forward of the cargo area and pumprooms if it is demonstrated to the Commandant that the overall degree of safety of the vessel is improved and that the degree of fire and life safety for these spaces is not less than the degree of fire and life safety for similar spaces located aft.
( e ) On liquefied gas carriers: ( 1 ) Main cargo control stations may be located in the cargo area;
( 2 ) Accommodation, service, and control spaces may be located over cofferdams that isolate cargo tanks other than integral tanks from category A machinery spaces;
( 3 ) Pumprooms may not be recessed into any space below deck.
#### Hall *v.*Brown.

A claim for costs is not barred by a discharge in bankruptcy granted during tbe pendency of the action in which the costs accrued.

The court will not ordinarily order a judgment as of a prior term to •enable the debtor to plead a discharge in bankruptcy.

Case, for negligence. The action was entered March term, 1873, and March term, 1876, the defendant had a verdict. November 26, 1878, the plaintiff was granted a discharge in bankruptcy. Judgment on the verdict was ordered at’the law term in March, 1877, but was not ordered at the trial term till March, 1879, and has not yet been rendered. When judgment was ordered in March, 1879, the court ruled that the plaintiff’s discharge did not bar the defendant’s right to costs; and the plaintiff excepted.

*Carpenter*and *Bingham*Mitchell, for the plaintiff.

*Bay, Brew Jordan,*for the defendant.

Stanley, J.

By the discharge, the plaintiff was released from all debts provable against him, except those created by his fraud, or embezzlement, or by his defalcation as a public officer, or while acting in any fiduciary character. All the debts existing against him at the commencement of proceedings in bankruptcy, whether then payable or not, were provable. U. S. Rev. St. 992, 993, *ss.*5067, 5117, 5119.

The action was pending when the plaintiff’s discharge was granted. No judgment had then been rendered, and whether the defendant would recover cost was not decided. There was then no debt which was provable against the plaintiff. The defendant did not become entitled to costs until the final order of the court for judgment. Until then it was an open question which party, if either, would recover costs, for the verdict might have been set aside, and the plaintiff might have prevailed in the end; and, even if the defendant finally prevailed, it was within the power of the court to allow full costs, or limit or deny them. *Hollister*v. *Abbott,*31 N. H. 442. It is argued that it was within the power of the court to order judgment as of a term prior to the discharge, and *Blaisdell*v. *Harris,*52 N. H. 191, is cited in support of this view. This was a suit to collect a debt, and, the defendant having died, the motion was for a judgment as of a term prior to the death. The court granted it on the ground that justice required it. This case stands on different grounds. Here the object is to enable the plaintiff to release himself from a valid claim against him. For *199such, a purpose the court will not lend its aid. *Heywood*v. Wingate, 14 N. H. 73; *Goodall*v. Batchelder, 17 N. H. 386.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Bingham and Smith, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending February 24, 2007

----

EnforcementCivitas BankGroup, Inc., Franklin, Tennessee  -- issuance of a consent order of prohibition against Seresa T. Morgan, a former institution-affiliated party.					-Announced, February 23, 2007 					

Regulations And PoliciesLarge-Bank Deposit Insurance Determination  -- Board comment letter on the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's proposal to improve the process for determining the insured status of deposits at large banks.					-Approved, February 23, 2007 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: March 1, 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

## Chairpersons, Board of Scientific Counselors for Institutes and Centers at the National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a meeting scheduled by the Deputy Director for Intramural Research at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) with the Chairpersons of the Boards of Scientific Counselors. The Boards of Scientific Counselors are advisory groups to the                           ( print page 27828)                        Scientific Directors of the Intramural Research Programs at the NIH. This meeting will take place on June 11, 2007, from 10 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., at the NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, Building 1, Wilson Hall. The meeting will include a discussion of policies and procedures that apply to the regular review of NIH intramural scientists and their work, with special emphasis on clinical research.                

The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Ms. Colleen Crone at the Office of Intramural Research, NIH, Building 1, Room 160, Telephone (301) 496-1921 or FAX (301) 402-4273 in advance of the meeting.

Dated: May 11, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2450  Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 95 (Thursday, May 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2422]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review, Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Central 
Visual Processing Study Section, June 19, 2007, 8 a.m. to June 20, 
2007, 5 p.m. DoubleTree Hotel, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20814 which was published in the Federal Register on May 4, 2007, 72 FR 
25324-25325.
    The meeting will be held one day only on June 29, 2007. The meeting 
time and location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: May 8, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2422 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Peter J. Gardner and others, *as Executors, Respondents, v.*Emeline Miller, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc.*

Order affirmed, with ten. dollars costs and printing disbursements.