alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case Number: 15-cr-20316 

 v. 

 Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

ROBERT DARNELL JAMERSON, Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING 

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA 

AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT 

On January 8, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris conducted a plea 

hearing pursuant to Defendant’s consent. The Magistrate Judge issued her report that same day, 

recommending that this Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty. 

Although the Magistrate Judge’s report explicitly stated that the parties to this action 

could object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the 

report, neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The election not to file objections to 

the Magistrate Judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and 

recommendation waives any further right to appeal. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, 

ECF No. 38, is ADOPTED. 

 It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s plea of guilty is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 

Plea Agreement, ECF No. 37, is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT. 

1:15-cr-20316-TLL-PTM Doc # 40 Filed 01/27/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 274
Dated: January 27, 2016 s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on January 27, 2016. 

 s/Michael A. Sian 

 MICHAEL A. SIAN, Case Manager 

1:15-cr-20316-TLL-PTM Doc # 40 Filed 01/27/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 275
#### § 173.058 Double bottom requirements.

Each new sailing school vessel which has a mean length greater than 165 feet (50.3 meters) and is certificated for exposed water service must comply with the double bottom requirements in §§ 171.105 through 171.109, inclusive, of this subchapter.

[CGD 83-005, 51 FR 924, Jan. 9, 1986]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 94-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee (#13883) meeting:

*Date and Time:*                         February 8-9, 2007, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         L'Enfant Plaza Hotel, 480 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20024.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. G. Wayne Van Citters, Director, Division of Astronomical Sciences, Suite 1045, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 703-292-4908.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations to the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) on issues within the field of astronomy and astrophysics that are of mutual interest and concern to the agencies.                    

*Agenda:*                         To hear presentations of current programming by representatives from NSF, NASA, DOE and other agencies relevant to astronomy and astrophysics; to discuss current and potential areas of cooperation between the agencies; to formulate recommendations for continued and new areas of cooperation and mechanisms for achieving them.                    

Dated: January 17, 2007.

Susanne E. Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-224 Filed 1-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
### 1 2 

### 3 4 5 

### 6 7 

### 8 9 

### 10 LAWRENCE M. BUREK, Bar No.132001 LAW OFFICE OF LAWRENCE M. BUREK 550 North Parkcenter Drive, Suite 204 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Telephone (714) 564-9033 Facsimile (114) 564-1685 Email:

**lburek@lsbla~ers.com** Attorney for Responent Ridan Investments, Inc. 

# RECEIVED DEC 2 120!6 HEARING DOCt\ET

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. 11 IN THE MATTER OF FAA Case No. 2012S0700133 FDMS No. 2013-1082 

### 12 RIDAN INVESTMENTS, INC. 

### 13 RESPONDENT. 14 

### 15 

### 16 Law Judge: Douglas Rawald WITHDRAWAL OF REQUEST FOR HEARING; CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE



### 17 WITHDRAWAL OF REQUEST FOR HEARING 

### 18 COMES NOW Respondent Ridan Investments, Inc., pursuant to 14C.F.R. 

### § 19 13.215, byandthrough itsdesignatedagentand legalcounsel, Lawrence Burekofthe 

### 20 Law Office ofLawrence M. Burek, and respectfullywithdraws its prior request for a 

### 21 hearing in this matter contesting the Final Notice Of Proposed Civil Penalty served 22 January 14, 2014, ··on the grounds that the parties have reached a settlement 23 agreement. 

### 24 Dated: December 15, 2016 LAW OFFICE OF LAWRENCE M. BUREK 

### 25 

### 26 27 **o~** 

## /Ll

__ By· 

## I

**·--rLAMWnnREErrNCnE~M'.nBnUnRrEuK-----** 

### 28 Attorney for Respondent Ridan Investments, Inc. 

### 1CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I herebycertifythat copies ofthe foregoing document have been duly served via first class mail on this date to the following: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building

- Suite 2W1000 Hon. Douglas M. Rewald U.S. Administrative LawJudge Office of Hearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJerseyAvenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 Charles Raley

- SeniorAttorney Enforcement Division, AGC-300 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 I also hereby certify that a copy ofthe foregoing document has been sent on this date electronically as an email attachment and in PDF format to: Jacklyn Booker Attorney-Advisor Office of Hearings, M-20, U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJerseyAve., S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 E-mail: Jacklyn.Booker@dot.gov Executed

**this~** dayof December, 2016 at Santa An California.

RRI JO 

## rE-S Legal AssisVant Law Office of Lawrence M. Burek Attorneyfor Respondent Ridan Investments
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors and Shareholders
SIPEX Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No.s 333-06123, 333-32329 and 333-31410) on Form S-8 and the registration
statement (No. 333-33152) on Form S-3 of SIPEX Corporation of our report dated
February 9, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of SIPEX
Corporation as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity and comprehensive income and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000,
which report appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of
SIPEX Corporation.

The report of KPMG LLP contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1998, have
been restated to reflect a pooling-of-interests transaction with Calogic
Corporation. The financial statements of Calogic Corporation at June 30, 1999
and for the year then ended were audited by Sallmann, Yang & Alameda and the
report of KPMG LLP, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for Calogic
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1998, is based solely on the report
of Sallmann, Yang & Alameda.



Boston, Massachusetts
March 16, 2001
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7650

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SANDRA LEGREE JONES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CR-93-92, CA-99-2379-5-22)

Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 30, 2000

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sandra Legree Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Cameron Glenn Chandler,

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Sandra Legree Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Jones, Nos. CR93-92; CA-99-2379-5-22 (D.S.C. Nov. 23, 1999). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### George Weyh, *Plaintiff, v.*Felix Boylan and others, *Defendants*.

Order affirmed. Opinion

*Per Curiam.*
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: MIDLAND FUNDING LLC,

Relator

. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 6

- 00 078

- C V

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

O R D E R

The Court has this day considered the Relator’s motion for emergency stay and concludes

the motion should be GRANTED. Therefore, the County Court at Law No. 5 is directed to stay

all proceedings in cause number 2014

- CCV

- 01226, styled Miguel Marquez v. Mid land Funding

LLC (originally styled Midland Funding LLC v. Miguel Marquez )

, pending disposition of this

original proceeding or further order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 26 th day of April

, 20 1 6

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Hughes , JJ.
§ 196.40-1 Application. ( a ) The provisions of this subpart shall apply to all vessels except as specifically noted.
Case 2:15-cv-11773-LJM-APP   ECF No. 16-11   filed 05/16/16    PageID.205    Page 1 of 3

Case 2:15-cv-11773-LJM-APP   ECF No. 16-11   filed 05/16/16    PageID.206    Page 2 of 3

Case 2:15-cv-11773-LJM-APP   ECF No. 16-11   filed 05/16/16    PageID.207    Page 3 of 3
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending June 30, 2007

|Filer                 | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                              
|--------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|COUNTY BANK           | * Branch       | County Bank, Merced, California, to establish a branch facility at McLane High School, 2727 North Cedar, Fresno, California.                                                                                              | Newspaper:06/27/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:            | 06/27/2007    
|Federal Register:     | Not applicable
|WCB HOLDINGS, INC.    | * 3A1          | WCB Holdings, Inc., to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Western Commercial Bank, both of Woodland Hills, California.                                                                             | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:07/16/2007 
|Newspaper:            | Not available 
|Federal Register:     | 07/16/2007    
|WELLS FARGO & COMPANY | * 3A3          | Wells Fargo & Company, San Francisco, California, to aquire 100 percent of Greater Bay Bancorp, East Palo Alto, California, and thereby indirectly acquire its subsidiary, Greater Bay Bank, N.A., Palo Alto, California. | Newspaper:07/21/2007Federal Register:07/23/2007    
|Newspaper:            | 07/21/2007    
|Federal Register:     | 07/23/2007    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Kittie H. Stanley, *Respondent, v.*The City of Watertown, *Appellant.*

Judgment and order affirmed.
§ 30.10-15 Combustible liquid—TB/ALL. The term *combustible liquid* means any liquid having a flashpoint above 80 °F. (as determined from an open-cup tester, as used for test of burning oils). In the regulations of this subchapter, combustible liquids are referred to by grades, as follows: ( a ) *Grade D.* Any combustible liquid having a flashpoint below 150 °F. and above 80 °F.
( b ) *Grade E.* Any combustible liquid having a flashpoint of 150 °F. or above.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16657, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGD 73-96, 42 FR 49023, Sept. 26, 1977]
# Fourth Court of Appeals
**San Antonio, Texas**

October 19 , 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00487

- CV

Joe GUILLEN , Carolyn Harris, Sidney Hipp, Wayne Holmes and Shenandoah Church of Christ, Appellants

v.

Gabriel RODRIGUEZ

, Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2020

- CI10510
Honora ble Angelica Jimenez , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

T he t rial court clerk has filed a notification of late record, stating that appellant s have
f

ailed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk ’ s record and that appellant s are not entitled to preparation of the clerk’s record without paying the fee

.

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant s provide written proof to this court on or before October 30, 2020

, that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been m ade to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant s are entitled to appeal without paying the clerk ’ s fee. If appellant s fail to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b); see also T EX

. R

. A PP

. P. 42.3(c) (allowing dismissal of appeal if an appellant fails to comply with an order of this court).

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 19th day of October, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
# C_2011331EN.01002401.xml

| 12.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/24

---

Action brought on 19 August 2011 — Scandic Distilleries v OHMI — Bürgerbräu, August Röhm & Söhne (BÜRGER)

(Case T-460/11)

2011/C 331/46

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Scandic Distilleries SA (Bihor, Romania) (represented by: Á. László, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bürgerbräu, August Röhm & Söhne KG (Bad Reichenhall, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Alter the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 25 May 2011 in case R 1962/2010-2 and render the registration of the trade mark application as a Community trade mark with regard to all goods and services concerned; |
| --- | --- |

—

Alter the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 25 May 2011 in case R 1962/2010-2 and render the registration of the trade mark application as a Community trade mark with regard to all goods and services concerned;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘BÜRGER ORIGINAL PREMIUM PILS TRADITIONAL BREWED QUALITY REGISTERED TRADEMARK SIEBENBURGEN’, for goods and services in classes 32 and 35 — Community trade mark application No 8359663

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 1234061 of the word mark ‘Bürgerbräu’, for goods and services in classes 21, 32 and 42

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Partially upheld the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal wrongly established the existence of likelihood of confusion

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2014052EN.01003302.xml

| 22.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 January 2014 — Aloe Vera of America v OHIM — Detimos (FOREVER)

(Case T-528/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark FOREVER - Earlier national figurative mark 4 EVER - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009)

2014/C 52/60

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Aloe Vera of America, Inc. (Dallas, Texas, United States) (represented by: R. Niebel and F. Kerl, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Detimos — Gestão Imobiliária, SA (Carregado, Portugal) (represented by: V. Caires Soares, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 August 2011 (Case R 742/2010-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Diviril — Distribuidora de Viveres do Ribatejo, Lda and Aloe Vera of America, Inc.

da

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Aloe Vera of America, Inc. to pay the costs, including those incurred by Detimos — Gestão Imobiliária, SA in the course of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Aloe Vera of America, Inc. to pay the costs, including those incurred by Detimos — Gestão Imobiliária, SA in the course of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

---

(1)  OJ C 362, 10.12.2011.

1

---
§ 34.10-15 Piping—T/ALL. ( a ) All piping, valves and fittings shall meet the applicable requirements of subchapter F (Marine Engineering) of this chapter.
( b ) An adequate number of valves shall be installed to isolate damaged sections of piping except on self-propelled vessels carrying bulk liquefied gases that must have stop valves: ( 1 ) At cross connections;
( 2 ) At the front of the after deck house; and
( 3 ) In the cargo area spaced 40 m (131 ft.) or less between hydrants.
( c ) All distribution valves shall be marked as required by § 35.40-10 of this subchapter.
( d ) Tankships of 500 gross tons and over on an international voyage must be provided with at least one international shore connection which meets ASTM F 1121 (incorporated by reference, see § 34.01-15). Facilities must be available enabling such a connection to be used on either side of the vessel.
( e ) For tankships on an international voyage, the diameter of the fire main shall be sufficient for the effective distribution of the maximum required discharge from two fire pumps operating simultaneously. This requirement is in addition to § 34.10-5(b). The discharge of this quantity of water through hoses and nozzles at a sufficient number of adjacent hydrants shall be at a minimum Pitot tube pressure of approximately 71 pounds per square inch on self-propelled vessels that carry bulk liquefied gases and approximately 50 pounds per square inch on other tankships.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16694, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGD 74-289, 44 FR 26006, May 3, 1979, CGD 88-032, 56 FR 35821, July 29, 1991; USCG-2000-7790, 65 FR 58459, Sept. 29, 2000]