alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013038EN.01002001.xml

| 9.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2012 — Strack v Commission

(Case T-199/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Articles 17, 17a, 19 and 90(1) of the Staff Regulations - Application for authorisation to disclose documents - Application for authorisation to publish a text - Application for authorisation to use findings before national judicial authorities - Inadmissibility of the action at first instance - No act adversely affecting an official - Article 90(a) of the Rules of Procedure)

2013/C 38/33

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Guido Strack (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2011 in Case F-132/07 Strack v Commission (2011) ECR-SC I-A-1-0000 and II-A-1-0000 and seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Strack

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mr Guido Strack to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Guido Strack to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders Mr Strack to pay the Civil Service Tribunal EUR 2 000 in order to reimburse part of the costs which that latter had to incur. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Mr Strack to pay the Civil Service Tribunal EUR 2 000 in order to reimburse part of the costs which that latter had to incur.

---

(1)  OJ C 232, 6.8.2011.

1

---
§ 170.050 General terms. ( a ) *Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center (CO, MSC)* means a district commander described in 33 CFR part 3 whose command includes a merchant marine technical office or an authorized representative of the district commander.
( b ) *Commandant* means the Commandant of the Coast Guard or an authorized representative of the Commandant.
( c ) *Exposed waters* means waters more than 20 nautical miles (37 kilometers) from the mouth of a harbor of safe refuge and other waters which the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection determines to present special hazards due to weather or other circumstances.
( d ) *Great Lakes* includes both the waters of the Great Lakes and of the St. Lawrence River as far east as a straight line drawn from Cap de Rosiers to West Point, Anticosti Island, and west of a line along the 63rd meridian from Anticosti Island to the north shore of the St. Lawrence River.
( e ) *Lakes, Bays, and Sounds* includes the waters of any lake, bay, or sound, except the Great Lakes.
( f ) *Oceans* includes the waters of— ( 1 ) Any ocean;
( 2 ) The Gulf of Mexico;
( 3 ) The Caribbean Sea;
( 4 ) The Gulf of Alaska; and
( 5 ) Any other waters designated as “oceans” by the Commandant.
( g ) *Officer in Charge Marine Inspection (OCMI)* means an officer of the Coast Guard who commands a Marine Inspection Zone described in 33 CFR part 3 or an authorized representative of that officer.
( h ) *Oil* means oil of any kind or in any form, and includes but is not limited to petroleum, fuel oil, sludge, oil refuse, and oil mixed with wastes other than dredged spoil.
( i ) *Partially protected waters* means— ( 1 ) Waters within 20 nautical miles (37 kilometers) of the mouth of a harbor of safe refuge, unless determined by the OCMI to be exposed waters; and
( 2 ) Those portions of rivers, harbors, lakes, etc. which the OCMI determines not to be sheltered.
( j ) *Protected waters* means sheltered waters presenting no special hazards such as most rivers, harbors, lakes, etc.
( k ) *Rivers* means any river, canal, or any other similar body of water designated by the OCMI.
[CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51010, Nov. 4, 1983, as amended by CGD 88-070, 53 FR 34537, Sept. 7, 1988]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Friday, May 18, 2007.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

Enforcement Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-1956 Filed 4-16-07; 4:11 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
2:14-mj-30216-DUTY Doc # 6 Filed 05/06/14 Pg 1 of 4 Pg ID 45
2:14-mj-30216-DUTY Doc # 6 Filed 05/06/14 Pg 2 of 4 Pg ID 46
2:14-mj-30216-DUTY Doc # 6 Filed 05/06/14 Pg 3 of 4 Pg ID 47
2:14-mj-30216-DUTY Doc # 6 Filed 05/06/14 Pg 4 of 4 Pg ID 48
# C_2012049EN.01003202.xml

| 18.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/32

---

Action brought on 28 December 2011 — Müller v OHIM — Loncar (Sunless)

(Case T-662/11)

2012/C 49/58

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Thomas Müller (Gütersloh, Germany) (represented by: J. Schmidt, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Loncar, SL (Sabadell (Barcelona), Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 September 2011 in Case R 2508/2010-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 September 2011 in Case R 2508/2010-2;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Thomas Müller

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the word element ‘Sunless’, for goods in Classes 6, 19, 22 and 24.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Loncar, SL

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Word marks ‘SUNLESS’ and ‘LONCAR-SUNLESS’ for goods in Classes 22, 23 and 24 and ropes, string, nets, tents, awnings, tarpaulins, sails, sacks and bags (not included in other classes); padding and stuffing materials (except of rubber or plastics); raw fibrous textile materials.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition allowed.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 as there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.

Pleas in law:

---
JUVENILE COURT PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE

FINAL REPORT 1

A mendment of Pa.R.J.C.P. 330, 337, and 515

On February 1 3 , 2019 , the Supreme Court amended Rule s of Juvenile Court

Procedur e 330, 337, and 515 to update statutory references as a result of t he Act of

June 28, 2018, P.L. 402 concerning the “clean slate” program for limiting public access

to certain criminal history. T he amendment will become effective June 28, 2019 to

coincide with the effective date of the Act amending 42 Pa.C.S. § 6307.

1 The Committee’s Final Report should not be confused with the official Committee

Comments to the rules. Also note that the Supreme Court does not adopt the

Committee’s Comments or the contents of the Committee’s explanatory Final Reports.
EXHIBIT 99.14
 CONSENT OF EXPERT
   (a)
    
    under the headings Operations and Development Projects  Uranium Operating
Properties  Inkai, Mineral Reserves and Resources  and Governance  Interest of
Experts in the Corporations Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31,
2010 dated February 16, 2011 for the Inkai property; and(b)
    
    under the heading Mineral Reserves and Resources in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation for the year ended December 31,
2010 dated February 14, 2011 for the Inkai property,
    /s/
    
    Charles FoldenauerName:
    
    Charles Foldenauer, P. Eng.Title:
    
    Operations Director, Joint Venture Inkai Limited Liability PartnershipDate:
    
    February 16, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 92 (Monday, May 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2378]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting; Notification of Item Added to Meeting 
Agenda

Date of Meeting: May 1, 2007.

Status: Closed.

Previous Announcement: 72 FR 20149, April 23, 2007.

Addition: Postal Regulatory Commission Opinion and Recommended Decision 
on Reconsideration in Docket No. R2006-1.
    At its closed meeting on May 1, 2007, the Board of Governors of the 
United States Postal Service voted unanimously to add this item to the 
agenda of its closed meeting and that no earlier announcement was 
possible. The General Counsel of the United States Postal Service 
certified that in her opinion discussion of this item could be properly 
closed to public observation.

Contact Person for More Information: Wendy A. Hocking, Secretary of the 
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000.

Wendy A. Hocking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-2378 Filed 5-9-07; 4:17 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
§ 32.63-5 Barge hull classifications—B/ALL. ( a ) Each barge subject to the provision of this subpart shall be assigned a hull type number. The Commandant will designate the barge hull types to be used for carrying cargoes in order to insure that the vessel is designed consistent with the degree and nature of the hazard of the commodity carried.
( b ) For this purpose the barge hull types shall be as follows: ( 1 ) *Type I barge hull.* Barge hulls classed as Type I are those designed to carry products which require the maximum preventive measures to preclude the uncontrolled release of the cargo to the waterways and/or atmosphere.
( 2 ) *Type II barge hull.* Barge hulls classed as Type II are those designed to carry products which require substantial preventive measures to preclude uncontrolled release to the atmosphere, but whose uncontrolled release to the waterways does not constitute a longlasting public or operating personnel hazard, though local and temporary pollution may occur.
( 3 ) *Type III barge hull.* Barge hulls classed as Type III are those designed to carry products of sufficient hazard to require a moderate degree of control.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Cobbler Nevada, LLC, )

)

) Case No.: 1:15-cv-11875

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

) 

DOES 1-23, )

 ) 

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), In light of the statements made in Movant’s 

Beal’s motion (ECF No. 5), including the affirmative steps taken to prevent further piracy, 

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby files this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal without prejudice as to Mrs. Patricia Beal.

DATED: September 1, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

 By: s/Paul J. Nicoletti

Paul Nicoletti (P-44419)

NICOLETTI LAW, PLC

33717 Woodward Avenue, Ste. #433

Birmingham, MI 48009

Landline: (248) 203-7800

eFax: (248) 928-7051

Email: pauljnicoletti@gmail.com

http://www.nicolettilawplc.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF 

COBBLER NEVADA, LLC

1:15-cv-11875-TLL-PTM Doc # 9 Filed 08/31/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 53
§ 307.7 Information required in report. ( a ) *Types of reports.* Reports on vessel departure, arrival, position and deviation are required under this part. Sailing plans are optional, and may be sent prior to departure, or may be combined with departure reports.
( b ) *Report content.* Content of each type of required report are specified below. Note that the word “MAREP” must be included in the text of each message if MARAD is to receive the information. ( 1 ) *Sailing plan report.* Sailing plan reports, though optional, must contain the following: ( i ) Vessel name,
( ii ) International Radio Call Sign,
( iii ) Intended time of departure,
( iv ) Port of departure and latitude/longitude,
( v ) Port of destination and latitude/longitude,
( vi ) Estimated time of arrival,
( vii ) Route information, and
( viii ) The keyword “MAREP”. If optional remarks are included, they must follow at the end of the text.
( 2 ) *Departure report.* Departure reports must contain the following: ( i ) Vessel name,
( ii ) International Radio Call Sign,
( iii ) Time of departure,
( iv ) Port of departure,
( v ) Latitude and longitude, and
( vi ) The keyword “MAREP”. If optional remarks are included, they must follow at the end of the text.
( 3 ) *Position report.* Position reports must contain the following: ( i ) Vessel name,
( ii ) International Radio Call Sign,
( iii ) Time at reported position,
( iv ) Latitude and longitude, and
( v ) The keyword “MAREP”. If optional remarks are included, they must follow at the end of the text.
( 4 ) *Deviation report.* Deviation reports are necessary to report sailing plan changes or other changes and must contain the following: ( i ) Vessel name,
( ii ) International Radio Call Sign,
( iii ) The changes to prior reports, and
( iv ) The keyword “MAREP”. If optional remarks are included, they must follow at the end of the text.
( 5 ) *Arrival report.* Arrival reports must contain the following: ( i ) Vessel name,
( ii ) International Radio Call Sign,
( iii ) Port name,
( iv ) Latitude and longitude,
( v ) Time of arrival, and
( vi ) The keyword “MAREP”.
If optional remarks are included, they must follow at the end of the text.
<PAGE>   1



WORLDTALK COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION                                EXHIBIT 11.1
Computation of Loss Per Share
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,

                                                                    1996           1995
                                                                  --------        -------
<S>                                                               <C>
Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $(5,240)       $(3,640)
                                                                   =======        =======
Weighted average common shares outstanding  . . . . . . . . . .      7,669          1,014
Number of common share equivalents resulting from option
and warrants, computed using the treasury stock method  . . . .          -              -
Preferred stock, on an "as if converted basis" using the
exchange rate in effect at the initial public offering date . .      1,506          2,485
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 83 issuances and grants(1)                 -          4,108
                                                                   -------        -------
Number of common shares and common share equivalents
used in computation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      9,175          7,607
                                                                   -------        -------
Net income (loss) per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $ (0.57)       $ (0.48)
                                                                   =======        =======
</TABLE>





(1)      Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 83, common stock warrants, options and other potentially dilutive
securities issued during the 12 month period preceding the date of initial
filing of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-1482),
have been included in the calculation of common equivalent shares, using the
treasury stock method, as if they were outstanding for all periods presented,
even if anti-dilutive.





                                                                              43
Case 2:14-cv-14028-MFL-PJK ECF No. 8-1, PageID.87 Filed 04/22/15 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:14-cv-14028-MFL-PJK ECF No. 8-1, PageID.88 Filed 04/22/15 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:14-cv-14028-MFL-PJK ECF No. 8-1, PageID.89 Filed 04/22/15 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:14-cv-14028-MFL-PJK ECF No. 8-1, PageID.90 Filed 04/22/15 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:14-cv-14028-MFL-PJK ECF No. 8-1, PageID.91 Filed 04/22/15 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:14-cv-14028-MFL-PJK ECF No. 8-1, PageID.92 Filed 04/22/15 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:14-cv-14028-MFL-PJK ECF No. 8-1, PageID.93 Filed 04/22/15 Page 7 of 7
Date: 20150 811 Revision: 1.0 Revision:1.0 Page 1 of 1 PRIVACY INFORMATION

- NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Appendix G

**Public Interest**

The UAS operation s involving the DJ I Phantom 2, Phantom 2+ , DJI Phantom 3 , Inspire, and Matrice will be in the public interest for many reasons. UAS operations in aerial survey ing, aerial photograph y, agriculture operations, aerial inspection and mapping operations with little to no negative impact on our fragile environment. UAS’s will reduce noise, fuel vapor, fuel burn, fuel spills and many

of the other dangerous side effects of the larger manned aircraft. Any operations which involve manned aircraft, other than cargo or passenger transport, can be conduct with less impact on the environment by a UAS. A UAS can conduct; aerial surveying, aeria l photography , and mapping operations with little to no effect on the environment from noise, fuel vapor, fuel burn, fuel spills, damage from rotor wash, or man y o f the other dangerous side effects of the larger manned aircraft.
#### § 32.56-40 Category A machinery spaces: Insulation—T/ALL.

Structural insulation within category A machinery spaces must have a barrier such as metal foil, sheet metal, cementitious coating, or other vapor barrier so that the surface of that insulation is impervious to oil and oil vapors.

[CGD 74-127, 41 FR 3844, Jan. 26, 1976, as amended by CGD 74-127, 41 FR 4826, Feb. 2, 1976]
§ 296.20 Tank vessels. ( a ) First priority for the award of MSP Operating Agreements under MSA 2003 shall be granted to a tank vessel that is constructed in the United States after October 1, 2004.
( b ) First priority for the award of MSP Operating Agreements under the MSA 2003 may be granted to a tank vessel that is less than ten years of age on the date it enters an MSP Operating Agreement: ( 1 ) *Provided:* ( i ) That the Contractor agrees to execute a binding agreement approved by the Secretary for a replacement vessel to be operated under the MSP Operating Agreement and to be built in the United States not later than nine months after the first date appropriated funds are available for construction and operating assistance for a minimum of three tank vessels;
( ii ) A tank vessel under this section is eligible to be included in the MSP under § 296.11(a); and
( iii ) A tank vessel under this section is owned and operated during the period of the MSP Operating Agreement by one or more persons that are Section 2 Citizens;
( 2 ) No payment can be made for an existing tank vessel granted priority one status after the earlier of: ( i ) Four years following the date this MSP Operating Agreement is effective, except if amounts are available for construction of a minimum of three tank vessels under the National Defense Tank Vessel Construction Assistance Program (NDTVCP) by October 1, 2007, then no payments shall be made for the existing “tank vessel” after four years following the date such amounts are available; or
( ii ) The date of delivery of the replacement tank vessel constructed in the United States after October 1, 2004.
( 3 ) The Secretary will not enter into more than five MSP Operating Agreements for tank vessels under this priority. If the five tank vessel MSP Operating Agreement slots are not fully subscribed, the Secretary, in consultation with the SecDef, may award the non-subscribed slots to lower priority vessels, if deemed appropriate. If the Secretary determines that no funds are, or are likely to be, allocated for any tank vessel construction in the United States, the five slots may nevertheless be awarded to existing tank vessels or the slots may be awarded permanently to any eligible vessels. The Secretary may temporarily award a slot reserved for a tank vessel under construction to a lower priority vessel during the construction period of that vessel if an existing tank vessel offered by the tank vessel Contractor is not eligible for priority for that slot. If no existing tank vessel is offered by the tank vessel Contractor, the Secretary may temporarily award an MSP Operating Agreement to any eligible vessel of another Contractor until a new tank vessel's construction is completed in the United States. Such temporary MSP Operating Agreements may be terminated under terms set forth in the temporary MSP Operating Agreement.
Submitted on record and briefs November 29, 1995,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration February 7, 1996

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Ralph R. Taylor, Claimant. Ralph R. TAYLOR, *Petitioner, v.*JOSEPH RYERSON & SON and Employer’s Insurance of Wausau, *Respondents.*

(94-04508; CA A87222)

910 P2d 424

Kimberley Chaput and Pozzi Wilson Atchison filed the brief for petitioner.

Richard H. Rizk filed the brief for respondents.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Haselton, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration. *Carroll v. Boise Cascade Corp.,*138 Or App 610, 910 P2d 1111 (1996).
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 23, 2009 

p0316 

Order 

 

March 23, 2009 

137840 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137840 

 COA: 287971 

Berrien CC: 2007-403932-FH 

STEVE CAPRICE SMITH, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 29, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.