alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015034EN.01003201.xml

| 2.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 December 2014 — Novartis v OHIM — Dr Organic (BIOCERT)

(Case T-605/11) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark BIOCERT - Earlier national word mark BIOCEF - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 034/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Novartis AG (Basel, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Douglas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Dr Organic Ltd (Swansea, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 September 2011 (Case R 1030/2010-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Novartis AG and Dr Organic Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 28 September 2011 (Case R 1030/2010-4). |
| --- | --- |

1)

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 28 September 2011 (Case R 1030/2010-4).

| 2) | Orders OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders OHIM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pop N Go, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

|                        |                                                                                      
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:
February 14, 2007 |                                                                                      
|                        | By:
/s/ Melvin Wyman                                                                 
|                        | Name:
Melvin Wyman                                                                   
|                        | Title:
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting                       Officer
|                        |                                                                                      



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Pop N Go, Inc. and will be retained by Pop N Go, Inc. and furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
II 

Calendar No. 141 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2090 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

JULY 30, 2009 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 431 State Street in Ogdensburg, New York, 

as the ‘‘Frederic Remington Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FREDERIC REMINGTON POST OFFICE BUILD4 ING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 431 State Street in Ogdensburg, 

7 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Fred8 eric Remington Post Office Building’’. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2090 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Frederic Remington 

5 Post Office Building’’. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS

wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 141 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2090 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postington Post Office Building’’. Ogdensburg, New York, as the ‘‘Frederic Rem- al Service located at 431 State Street in 

JULY 30, 2009 

Reported without amendment 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  333-92343)  pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan of  Styleclick.com
Inc. and in the  Registration  Statement (Form S-3 No.  333-90175) of our report
dated February 21, 2000,  with respect to the financial  statements and schedule
of  Styleclick.com  Inc.  included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 1999.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 30, 2000
MIED (Rev. 8/07) Notice of Correction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Plaintiff(s), Case No. 

v. Judge 

Magistrate Judge 

Defendant(s).

/

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

Docket entry number , filed , has been modified. The explanation for the correction

is stated below.

The docket entry was made on the wrong case. 

The corresponding document image was missing or incomplete.

The wrong document image was associated.

The wrong judicial officer was listed on the case docket.

The filer information was inaccurate or omitted from the docket text.

The judicial officer information was inaccurate or omitted from the docket text.

The docket text was changed to include the Partial Payment Order.

Other:

 If you need further clarification or assistance, please contact at .

 DAVID J. WEAVER, CLERK OF COURT 

Dated:

 Deputy Clerk

Hemlock Semiconductor Corporation,

Kyocera Corporation

15-11236

Thomas L. Ludington

Patricia T. Morris

108 6/7/2016

✔ Wrong Judge Selected

Kristen Krawczyk (989) 894-8821

June 7, 2016 s/ Kristen Krawczyk

1:15-cv-11236-TLL-PTM Doc # 110 Filed 06/07/16 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 5233
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-20304

Conference Calendar

__________________

TONY FITZGERALD COLE,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA H 96-173

- - - - - - - - - -

August 22, 1996

Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Tony Fitzgerald Cole, # 612907, appeals the denial of his

motion for a preliminary injunction. Cole argues that he is

entitled to a preliminary injunction instructing the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) Medical Director to

instruct the Bill Clements Unit to provide him immediately with

medication prescribed by Dr. Balmas Lawrence. We have reviewed

the record and Cole's brief and AFFIRM the district court's 
No. 96-20304

-2-

denial for essentially the same reasons set forth by the district

court. Cole v. TDCJ, No. H-96-0173 (S.D. Tex.; Mar. 4, 1996). 

Cole's motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. See

Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691 F.2d 209, 212 (5th Cir. 1982).
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2012-0039

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM144AD

SBCN SBF100-53-115, R02 --- 6/21/11

SBCN SBF100-53-115, R01 --- 6/17/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7210

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SHAPAT AHDAWAN NABAYA, a/k/a Norman Abbott,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:17-cr-00003-MHL-1)

Submitted: January 19, 2021 Decided: January 22, 2021

Before AGEE, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya was convicted of retaliating against a federal officer by 

false claim and making a false statement in bankruptcy, and the district court sentenced 

him to 71 months’ imprisonment. In March 2019, we affirmed Nabaya’s criminal 

judgment on direct appeal. United States v. Nabaya, 765 F. App’x 895, 902 (4th Cir. 2019) 

(No. 18-4134). Nabaya has now filed a second notice of appeal of the same criminal 

judgment. Because we previously affirmed this criminal judgment, we dismiss the appeal 

as duplicative. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### § 183.430 Portable lights.

Each vessel must be equipped with at least two operable portable battery lights. One of these lights must be located at the operating station and the other at the access to the propulsion machinery space.
§ 190.10-90 Vessels contracted for prior to March 1, 1968. ( a ) Existing arrangements previously approved will be considered satisfactory so long as they are maintained in good condition to the satisfaction of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection. Minor repairs and alterations may be made to the same standards as the original design: *Provided,* That in no case will a greater departure from the standards of §§ 190.10-5 through 190.10-45 be permitted than presently exists. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as exempting any vessel from having two means of escape from all main compartments where persons on board may be quartered or normally employed.
§ 114.110 General applicability. ( a ) Except as in paragraph (b) of this section, this subchapter applies to each vessel of less than 100 gross tons that carries more than 150 passengers, or has overnight accommodations for more than 49 passengers, and that— ( 1 ) Carries at least one passenger for hire;
( 2 ) Is chartered with or without a crew provided or specified by the owner or the owner's representative; or
( 3 ) If a submersible vessel, carries at least one passenger for hire; or
( 4 ) Is a ferry carrying more than 150 passengers, or having overnight accommodations for more than 49 passengers. Note to paragraph ( a
):
For a vessel of less than 100 gross tons that carries 150 or less passengers or has overnight accommodations for 49 or less passengers, see subchapter T of this chapter.
( b ) This subchapter does not apply to: ( 1 ) A vessel operating exclusively on inland waters that are not navigable waters of the United States;
( 2 ) An oceanographic research vessel;
( 3 ) A boat forming part of a vessel's lifesaving equipment and that is not used for carrying passengers except in emergencies or during emergency drills;
( 4 ) A vessel of a foreign country that is a party to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as amended (SOLAS), to which the United States Government is currently a party, and which has on board a current valid SOLAS Passenger Ship Safety Certificate; or
( 5 ) A vessel of a foreign country, whose government has inspection laws approximating those of the United States and which by its laws accords similar privileges to vessels of the United States, which has on board a current valid certificate of inspection, permitting the carrying of passengers, issued by its government.
( c ) Unless otherwise provided, an existing vessel that is not required to comply with a requirement in this subchapter may comply with the regulation that was applicable to the vessel on March 10, 1996.
( d ) A vessel required by this subchapter to meet applicable sections of subchapter H shall follow the phase-in schedule for certain equipment and requirements found in this subchapter.
( e ) Irrespective of build date, a vessel to which this subchapter applies must meet 46 CFR 118.400(d), 118.500, 122.364, and 122.420(b) if it is not a ferry, and if it — ( 1 ) Has overnight accommodations for passengers; or
( 2 ) Is operating on a Coastwise or Oceans route.
( f ) Irrespective of build date, a vessel to which this subchapter applies must meet 46 CFR 116.115(c), 116.500(o), 122.410(b), 122.507, and 122.515 if it is not a ferry, and has overnight accommodations for passengers.
( g ) The requirements outlined in paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section must be met no later than March 28, 2022, except for: ( 1 ) The requirements to implement 46 CFR 118.400(d) and 118.500, which must be met no later than December 27, 2022; and
( 2 ) The requirements to implement 46 CFR 116.115(c) and 116.500(o), which must be met no later than December 27, 2023.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 885, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51347, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2008-1107, 74 FR 63664, Dec. 4, 2009; 86 FR 73170, Dec. 27, 2021; 87 FR 3449, Jan. 24, 2022]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                     Washington, D.C.  20549


                          FORM 10-K/A


     ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 
           For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997


Purpose:  To supplement in part Part IV, Item 14(c) of Company's
          previously filed Form 10-K in order to file as an exhibit
          the Annual Servicing Report of Company's Independent
          Public Accountants. 


                  Commission File Nos. 0-21979


              HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER LOAN TRUST 1996-1 
     (Exact name of Registrant as specified in Department
      of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service Form SS-4)

HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION
(Administrator of the Trust)
(Exact name as specified in Administrator's charter)


            DELAWARE                      36-3670374             
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer Identification
incorporation of Administrator)   Number of Registrant


 2700 SANDERS ROAD, PROSPECT HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS         60070     
(Address of principal executive offices of           (Zip Code)
Administrator)


Administrator's telephone number, including area code(847)564-5000












<PAGE>













                           SIGNATURES




     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Administrator has duly caused
this amendment to be signed on behalf of the Household Consumer
Loan Trust 1996-1 by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.




                             HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION,
                         as Administrator of and on behalf of the

                           HOUSEHOLD CONSUMER LOAN TRUST 1996-1
                                    (Registrant)




Date:  April 3, 1998          By:/s/John W. Blenke              
                                 John W. Blenke
                                 Assistant Secretary



















<PAGE>



                                 




                           Exhibit Index


Exhibit No.    Exhibit                                      Page No.

99             Copy of Independent Public Accountants          4
               Annual Servicing Report dated March 26, 1998.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6418

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. DAVID CARROLL, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:94-cr-00519-1)

Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: July 1, 2009

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Carroll, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: David Carroll appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and his motion to convene a three-judge district court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Carroll's motion to remand and affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Carroll , No. 1:94-cr00519-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 7, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 28.150 Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacons (EPIRBs).

Each vessel must be equipped with an emergency position indicating radio beacon (EPIRB) as required by [46 CFR part 25, subpart 25.26](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/part-25/subpart-25.26).

Note:

Each vessel which uses radio communication equipment must have a Ship Radio Station License issued by the Federal Communications Commission, as set forth in [47 CFR part 80](/on/2024-09-23/title-47/part-80).
|   | i.   | The                  report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act 1934; and |
|--------|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | ii.   | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all                  material respects, the financial condition and results of                  operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  January                  21, 2008  | /s/ THOMAS                    A. WAGNER                                                                     Name:                    Thomas A. WagnerTitle:                    Chief Financial Officer  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### McMeel et al., Appellants, v. O’Connor, Appellee.

Void Sale — Redemption.

One who was intended to be made trustee, but by mistake was not so' made, takes no title under the deed of trust and is not invested with any powers as trustee. A sale by liim is void, and does not preclude the trustor of his right to redeem.

*Appeal from, the District Court of Arapahoe County.*

Mr. William Knapp, for appellants.

Messrs. Sullivan & May, for appellee.

*114Reed, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

It appears by the pleadings of both parties that O’Connor (appellee) borrowed $250, for which he gave his note payable to McMeel, and secured it by a trust deed upon two building lots which were conveyed in trust by mistake to McMéel, as trustee, to secure money alleged in the trust deed to be due and payable to John C. Keegan. The parties were reversed in the trust deed; the property was conveyed to the beneficiary, instead of the trustee. It was evidently the intention to convey to Keegan, as trustee, to secure McMeel, but the conveyance was to McMeel as trustee to secure Keegan ; the note was also described in the trust deed as payable to Keegan.

The note having matured and being unpaid, Keegan, assuming to act as trustee, advertised and sold the property to McMeel as purchaser and executed a deed as trustee purporting to convey the property. Some time after O’Connor tendered the amount due upon the note, which McMeel refused, claiming to be owner of the property. This suit was brought to compel McMeel to take the amount due and, by proper conveyance, to clear up the title. The facts stated in the complaint are admitted in the answer, and across complaint was filed alleging that the conveyance was the result of a mutual mistake, and asking for a reformation of the deed of trust, and that McMeel be declared the owner of the property. A demurrer was filed to the answer and cross complaint and sustained by the court. Defendants elected to stand by their answer, and a decree was entered for the plaintiff, and an appeal from such decree.

The decree must be affirmed. No title whatever passed to Keegan by virtue of the conveyance by trust deed, nor was he invested with any powers as trustee, hence, in assuming the duties of trustee and attempting to advertise and sell, he was only a volunteer, and the proceedings and supposed deed made by him as trustee were void and of no effect. No title having passed, the right of O’Connor to pay off the. in*115debtedness and receive a release of his property clear of the cloud east upon it by the pretended sale and conveyance was unquestionable. If a reform was needed of the trust deed to make it conform to the intention of the parties, it should have been reformed before attempting to dispose of the property under it.

*Affirmed.*
# C_2013377EN.01000902.xml

| 21.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 377/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 377/9

---

Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 25 September 2013 — Monster Cable Products, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Live Nation (Music) UK Limited

(Case C-41/12 P) (1)

1

2013/C 377/18

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 73, 10.3.2012.

1

---