alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 

Deborah S. Hunt 

Clerk

100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 

POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE 

CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 

Tel. (513) 564-7000 

www.ca6.uscourts.gov

 Filed: January 06, 2021 

 

Mr. Brandon Resch 

Carson City Correctional Facility 

10274 Boyer Road 

Carson City, MI 48811 

 Re: Case No. 20-2043, Mary McBride, et al v. MDOC, et al

Originating Case No.: 2:15-cv-11222 

Dear Counsel, 

 The Court issued the enclosed Order today in this case. 

 Sincerely, 

 

 

s/Antoinette Macon 

Case Manager 

Direct Dial No. 513-564-7015 

cc: Mr. Scott Allen Mertens 

 Mr. David J. Weaver 

 Mr. Zachary Austin Zurek 

Enclosure 

Case 2:15-cv-11222-SFC-DRG ECF No. 190, PageID.5047 Filed 01/06/21 Page 1 of 3 Case: 20-2043 Document: 5-1 Filed: 01/06/2021 Page: 1 (1 of 3)
Case No. 20-2043 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

ORDER

BRANDON RESCH 

 Interested Party - Appellant 

 and 

MARY ANN MCBRIDE; BRIAN STANLEY WITTMAN; RALPH WILLIAMS 

 Plaintiffs 

v. 

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; DANIEL H. HEYNS, in his official 

capacity as Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections; THOMAS G. FINCO, in his 

official capacity as Deputy Director of the Correctional Facilities Administration; RANDY 

TREACHER, in his official capacity as Chief Deputy Director of the Michigan Department of 

Corrections; ANTHONY STEWART, in his official capacity as Warden of the Women's Huron 

Valley Correctional Facility; JEFFREY WOODS, Warden, in his official capacity as Warden of 

the Chippewa Correctional Facility; CATHLEEN STODDARD, in her official capacity as 

Warden of the Carson City Correctional Facility 

 Defendants - Appellees 

 

 Appellant having previously been advised that failure to satisfy certain specified 

obligations would result in dismissal of the case for want of prosecution and it appearing that the 

appellant has failed to satisfy the following obligation(s): 

The proper fee was not paid by November 23, 2020 

 

Case 2:15-cv-11222-SFC-DRG ECF No. 190, PageID.5048 Filed 01/06/21 Page 2 of 3 Case: 20-2043 Document: 5-2 Filed: 01/06/2021 Page: 1 (2 of 3)
 It is therefore ORDERED that this cause be, and it hereby is, dismissed for want of 

prosecution. 

ENTERED PURSUANT TO RULE 45(a), 

RULES OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Issued: January 06, 2021 

___________________________________

Case 2:15-cv-11222-SFC-DRG ECF No. 190, PageID.5049 Filed 01/06/21 Page 3 of 3 Case: 20-2043 Document: 5-2 Filed: 01/06/2021 Page: 2 (3 of 3)
**EXHIBIT 99.7**I, O. Kim Goheen, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 40-F of Cameco Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. The issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and theaudit committee of issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
 

 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 31, 2008         */s/ O. Kim Goheen*   O. Kim Goheen   Senior Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                                       OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Biofield Corp.. (the
"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I, John D.
Stephens, the principal financial officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that:

The Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

The information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this certificate as of this 20th day of May
2005.

/s/ JOHN D. STEPHENS
------------------------------
John D. Stephens.
Senior Vice President and
Chief Executive Officer
# C_2014045EN.01001302.xml

| 15.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 December 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te’s-Hertogenbosch — Netherlands) — in the proceedings brought by X

(Case C-486/12) (1)

1

(Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data - Directive 95/46/EC - Conditions governing the exercise of a right of access - Levying of excessive fees)

2014/C 45/23

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Gerechtshof te’s-Hertogenbosch

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

X

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Gerechtshof te’s-Hertogenbosch (Netherlands) — Interpretation of the second indent of Article 12(a) of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (OJ 1995 L 281, p. 31) — Right of access to data — Communication of data undergoing processing — Meaning — Grant of access to data — Levying a fee.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | Article 12(a) of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data must be interpreted as not precluding the levying of fees in respect of the communication of personal data by a public authority. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 12(a) of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data must be interpreted as not precluding the levying of fees in respect of the communication of personal data by a public authority.

| 2. | Article 12(a) of Directive 95/46 must be interpreted as meaning that, in order to ensure that fees levied when the right to access personal data is exercised are not excessive for the purposes of that provision, the level of those fees must not exceed the cost of communicating such data. It is for the national court to carry out any verifications necessary, having regard to the circumstances of the case. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 12(a) of Directive 95/46 must be interpreted as meaning that, in order to ensure that fees levied when the right to access personal data is exercised are not excessive for the purposes of that provision, the level of those fees must not exceed the cost of communicating such data. It is for the national court to carry out any verifications necessary, having regard to the circumstances of the case.

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification of Chief Financial Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Party City Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’sknowledge, that:     (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended July 2, 2005(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company./s/Gregg A. Melnick Gregg A. Melnick*Chief Financial Officer*Dated: September 15, 2005     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.
§ 197.432 Surface-supplied air diving. The diving supervisor shall insure that— ( a ) Surface-supplied air diving is conducted at depths less than 190 fsw, except that dives with bottom times of 30 minutes or less may be conducted to depths of 220 fsw;
( b ) Each diving operation has a primary breathing gas supply;
( c ) Each diver is continuously tended while in the water;
( d ) When a diver is in a physically confining space, another diver is stationed at the underwater point of entry and is line-tending the diver;
( e ) For dives deeper than 130 fsw or outside the no-decompression limits— ( 1 ) Each diving operation has a secondary breathing gas supply;
( 2 ) A decompression chamber is ready for use at the dive location;
( 3 ) A diving stage is used except when a bell is provided;
( 4 ) A bell is used for dives with an in-water decompression time greater than 120 minutes, except when the diver is using a heavy-weight diving outfit or is diving in a physically confining space;
( 5 ) A separate dive team member tends each diver in the water;
( 6 ) A standby diver is available while a diver is in the water; and
( 7 ) Each diver has a diver-carried reserve breathing gas supply except when using a heavy-weight diving outfit or when diving in a physically confining space; and
( f ) The surface-supplied air diver has the equipment required by § 197.346 (b) or (d).
Editorial Note on Part 199
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 199 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59789, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 199.120 Launching stations. ( a ) Each launching station must be positioned to ensure safe launching with clearance from the propeller and from the steeply overhanging portions of the hull.
( b ) Each survival craft must be launched down the straight side of the vessel, except for free-fall launched survival craft.
( c ) Each launching station in the forward part of the vessel must— ( 1 ) Be in a sheltered position that is located aft of the collision bulkhead; and
( 2 ) Have a launching appliance approved with an endorsement as being of sufficient strength for forward installation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                  377,764
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            42,943
<ALLOWANCES>                              3,386
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        910,166
<PP&E>                                1,430,659
<DEPRECIATION>                          362,575
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        2,583,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 1,372,097
<BONDS>                                 865,726
<COMMON>                                    361
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                            6,404,377
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          2,583,590
<SALES>                                 535,741
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        547,967
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         3,083,362
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       63,790
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (2,702,292)
<INCOME-TAX>                             21,901
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (2,724,193)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                         (2,724,193)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.76)
        


</TABLE>
§ 171.067 Treatment of stepped and recessed bulkheads in Type I subdivision. ( a ) For the purpose of this section— ( 1 ) The main transverse watertight bulkhead immediately forward of a stepped bulkhead is referred to as bulkhead 1; and
( 2 ) The main transverse watertight bulkhead immediately aft of the stepped bulkhead is referred to as bulkhead 3.
( b ) If a main transverse watertight bulkhead is stepped, it and bulkheads 1 and 3 must meet one of the following conditions: ( 1 ) The separation between bulkheads 1 and 3 must not exceed the following: ( i ) If the factor of subdivision (FS) determined from § 171.065 (a) or (b) is greater than 0.9, the distance between bulkheads 1 and 3 must not exceed the maximum separation calculated to demonstrate compliance with § 171.065.
( ii ) If the factor of subdivision is 0.9 or less, the distance between bulkheads 1 and 3 must not exceed 90% of the floodable length or twice the maximum bulkhead separation calculated to demonstrate compliance with § 171.065, whichever is smaller.
( 2 ) Additional watertight bulkheads must be located as shown in Figure 171.067(a) so that distances A, B, C, and D, illustrated in Figure 171.067(a), satisfy the following: ( i ) Distances A and B must not exceed the maximum spacing allowed by § 171.065.
( ii ) Distances C and D must not be less than the minimum separation prescribed by § 171.065(e).
( 3 ) The distance A, illustrated in Figure 171.067(b), must not exceed the maximum length determined in § 171.065 corresponding to a margin line taken 3 inches (7.6 cm) below the step.
( c ) A main transverse bulkhead may not be recessed unless all parts of the recess are inboard from the shell of the vessel a distance A as illustrated in Figure 171.067(c).
( d ) Any part of a recess that lies outside the limits defined in paragraph (c) of this section must be treated as a step in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section.
( e ) The distance between a main transverse watertight bulkhead and the transverse plane passing through the nearest portion of a recessed bulkhead must be greater than the minimum separation specified by § 171.065(e).
( f ) If a main transverse bulkhead is stepped or recessed, equivalent plane bulkheads must be used in the calculations required to demonstrate compliance with § 171.065.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SoundView Technology Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Gerard P. Maus, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|Dated: November 14, 2002 |  | SOUNDVIEW TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC.
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------------
|                         |  | By:                             

26

---

QuickLinks
##### 



EXHIBIT 4

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND
SERVICES

For fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, KPMG LLP
and its affiliates were paid by Cameco Corporation and its subsidiaries the
following fees:

|                             |  |      |         |      |  |   |         | 
|---------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | ---- |  | - | ------- | 
|                             |  | 2003 |         | 2002
|                             |  |      |         |     
|Audit fees                   |  | $    | 524,000 |      |  | $ | 623,000 | 
|                             |  |      |         |      |  |   |         | 
|Audit  related fees:        |  |      |         |      |  |   |         | 
|Proposed AIM Listing for AGR |  | $    | 11,000  |      |  | $ | 57,000  | 
|Prospectus                   |  |      | 65,000  |      |  |   |        | 
|Translation services         |  |      | 26,000  |      |  |   |        | 
|Accounting disclosure        |  |      | 23,000  |      |  |   |        | 
|                             |  |      |         |      |  |   |         | 
|                             |  | $    | 125,000 |      |  | $ | 57,000  | 
|Tax:                         |  |      |         |      |  |   |         | 
|Compliance                   |  | $    | 96,000  |      |  | $ | 97,000  | 
|Planning and advice          |  |      | 127,000 |      |  |   | 177,000 | 
|                             |  |      |         |      |  |   |         | 
|                             |  | $    | 223,000 |      |  | $ | 274,000 | 
|All other fees:              |  |      |         |      |  |   |         | 
|Special investigation        |  | $    | 25,000  |      |  | $ | 30,000  | 
|                             |  |      |         |      |  |   |         | 
|                             |  | $    | 25,000  |      |  | $ | 30,000  | 
|                             |  |      |         |      |  |   |         | 
|Total                        |  | $    | 897,000 |      |  | $ | 984,000 | 
|                             |  |      |         |      |  |   |         | 

Cameco Corporations audit committee is required to pre-approve the audit
and non-audit services performed by the external auditors, including the tax
and all other fees noted above, in order to ensure the independence of the
external auditors. Unless a type of service to be provided by the external
auditor receives general pre-approval, it requires specific pre-approval by
Camecos audit committee or audit committee chair or, in the absence of the
committee chair, a member of the audit committee as designated by the audit
committee or board.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3796

_____________________________
J OHN G UIDRY ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistan ce of Appellate Counsel

— Original Jurisdiction

.

November 15, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

R AY , K ELSEY , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 John Guidry, pro se
, Petitioner

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.015-2 Types. ( a ) Unicellular expanded polyvinyl chloride-acetate copolymer or synthetic rubber modified polyvinyl chloride, polymer or copolymer plastic foam shall be of three types as follows: Type A—for life preservers, buoyant vests or buoyant cushions. Type B—for buoyant vests or buoyant cushions. Type C—for ring life buoys.
( b ) [Reserved]
§ 294.17 Subsequent award of TSP Operating Agreements. ( a ) *Availability.* When a TSP Operating Agreement becomes available through termination by the Secretary or early termination by an Agreement Holder, and no transfer under 46 U.S.C. 53405(e) is involved, MARAD will accept applications for a new TSP Operating Agreement pursuant to paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of this section: ( 1 ) The proposed vessel must meet the requirements of § 294.9;
( 2 ) The Applicant must meet the requirements of § 294.11; and
( 3 ) The Applicant must apply in accordance with the requirements of § 294.5.
( b ) *Consideration of applications.* The Secretary and SecDef will consider all applications within the priority structure of § 294.15(b).
( c ) *Notification and award of a new TSP Operating Agreement.* Upon selection of the best-qualified vessel(s) from among the applications received, MARAD will enter into a new TSP Operating Agreement with the successful Applicant as soon as is practicable. Successful Applicants must notify the Secretary of their acceptance of an offer to enter into a TSP Operating Agreement within 90 days.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending March 11, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us