alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.19
 CONSENT OF EXPERT
   (a)
    
    under the headings The Nuclear Business  Reserves and Resources, The Nuclear
Business  Development Projects  Cigar Lake, and Interest of Experts in the
Corporations Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2008 dated March
27, 2009 for the Cigar Lake property; and(b)
    
    under the headings Our Mineral Reserves and Resources  Mineral Reserves and
Resources and Qualified Persons in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation for the year ended December 31, 2008 dated February
16, 2009 for the Cigar Lake property,
    /s/  Doug McIlveenName:
    
    Doug McIlveen, P. Geo.Title:
    
    Chief Geologist, Cigar Lake project, 
Cameco Corporation
Abatement Order filed October 25, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00378-CV

____________

W & T OFFSHORE INC., Appellant

V.

LUKE MEYERS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-74366

ABATEMENT ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due June 14, 2016. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.1. The record was not filed. On June 23, 2016, the court reporter, Cynthia 

Montalvo, filed a motion for extension of time to file the record which was granted 

until July 14, 2016. Again, the record was not filed. On July 26, 2016, this court 

ordered the court reporter to file the record within 30 days. When the court reporter 

failed to file the record as ordered, on September 2, 2016, this court ordered the court 
reporter to file the record within 30 days, and instructed the court reporter that if the 

record was not filed, the court would order the trial court to conduct a hearing to 

determine the reason for failure to file the record. The record has not been filed with 

the court. The court reporter has filed a motion for extension of time until November 

3, 2016. 

The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the 

appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). Because the reporter’s 

record has not been filed timely as ordered, we deny the request and issue the 

following order.

We direct the judge of the 152nd District Court to conduct a hearing at which 

the court reporter, appellant’s counsel, and appellee’s counsel shall participate (a) to 

determine the reason for failure to file the record; (b) to establish a date certain when 

the reporter’s record will be filed, and (c) to make findings as to whether the court 

reporter should be held in contempt of court for failing to file the reporter’s record 

timely as ordered. We order the court to prepare a record, in the form of a reporter’s 

record, of the hearing. The judge shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, 

and shall order the trial clerk to forward to this court a supplemental clerk’s record 

containing the findings and conclusions. The hearing record and supplemental 

clerk’s record shall be filed with the clerk of this court within 30 days of the date of 

this order. 

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the 

trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also 

consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the 

court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. If the court reporter files the record 
prior to the date set for the hearing, the appeal will be reinstated and the trial court 

need not hold a hearing.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Busby, Donovan, and Brown.
##### 



EXHIBIT 5

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED
ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the inclusion in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of our report
dated January 26, 2004, except as to note 28(b) which is as of February 27,
2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Cameco Corporation as
at December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related consolidated statements of
earnings, retained earnings and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the Annual
Report on Form 40-F of Cameco Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003.

|                                          |  |                                   
|----------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
February 27, 2004 |  | /s/ KPMG LLP
Chartered Accountants
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice concerning the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a class of employees at the Allied Chemical Corporation Plant in Metropolis, Illinois, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On February 1, 2007, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

Atomic Weapons employees who were monitored or should have been monitored for exposure to ionizing radiation while working at Allied Chemical Corporation Plant in Metropolis, Illinois, from January 1, 1959 through December 31, 1976, and who were employed for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in the Special Exposure Cohort.

                        This designation became effective on March 3, 2007, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384*l*                        (14)(C). Hence, beginning on March 3, 2007, members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this notice, became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Larry Elliott, Director, Office of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *OCAS@CDC.GOV.*

Dated: March 12, 2007.

John Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 07-1274 Filed 3-15-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-M
§ 28.550 Icing. ( a ) *Applicability.* Each vessel that operates north of 42° North latitude between November 15 and April 15 or south of 42° South latitude between April 15 and November 15 must meet the requirements of this section.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, the weight of assumed ice on each surface above the waterline of a vessel which operates north of 66°30′ North latitude or south of 66° South latitude must be assumed to be at least: ( 1 ) 6.14 pounds per square foot (30 Kilograms per square meter) of horizontal projected area which corresponds to a thickness of 1.3 inches (33 millimeters); and
( 2 ) 3.07 pounds per square foot (15 Kilograms per square meter) of vertical projected area which corresponds to a thickness of 0.65 inches (16.5 millimeters).
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, the weight of assumed ice on a vessel that operates north of 42° North but south of 66°30′ North latitude or south of 42° South but north of 66° South latitude must be assumed to be at least one-half of the values required by paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section.
( d ) The height of the center of gravity of the accumulated ice should be calculated according to the position of each corresponding horizontal surface (deck and gangway) and each other continuous surface on which ice can reasonably be expected to accumulate. The projected horizontal and vertical area of each small discontinuous surface such as a rail, a spar, and rigging with no sail can be accounted for by increasing the calculated area by 15 percent.
( e ) The weight and location of ice must be included in the vessel's weight and centers of gravity in each condition of loading when performing the stability calculations required by this subpart.
[CGD 88-079, 56 FR 40393, Aug. 14, 1991; 56 FR 47679, Sept. 20, 1991]
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Form 10-K of Aerial Communications, Inc., of our report dated
January 28, 1998 (except with respect to the matters discussed in Note 9, as to
which the date is February 5, 1998), on the consolidated financial statements of
Aerial Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") included in the
Company's 1997 Annual Report to Shareholders, to the inclusion in this Form 10-K
of our report dated January 28, 1998 (except with respect to the matters
discussed in Note 9, as to which the date is February 5, 1998), on the financial
statement schedule of the Company, and to the incorporation of such reports into
the Company's previously filed S-8 Registration Statements, File No. 333-06471,
File No. 333-10199, File No. 333-10201, File No. 333-26429 and File No.
333-32743.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 26, 1998
The Honorab 1

 for s

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).

___________

No. 96-1143

Vincent Antone Johnson,

 *

 *

v.

 * District Court for the

 * Northern District of Iowa.

 * 

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellees.

___________

 Filed: September 10, 1996

Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

 dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 

tria Having carefully reviewed the entire record and the parties

submissions, we concl

not clearly erroneous, and based on these facts, we conclude defendants di

not violate the Eighth Amendment. Accordingly, w See

47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATE OF AMERICA Hon.: Stephen J. Murphy, III

Plaintiffs, Case No.: 2:14-cr-20599-SRS-RSW-8

v.

JOSEPH ARSENAULT, 

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________/

CORAL M. WATT P41508 CRAIG A. WEIER P33261

Attorney for Joseph Arsenault Assistant U.S. Attorney

615 Griswold, Suite 1626 211 W. Fort Street, Suite 2001

Detroit, Michigan 48226 Detroit, Michigan 48226

313-963-8464 313-226-9100

attywatt@gmail.com craig.weier@usdoj.gov

_____________________________________________________________________/

 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWL OF MOTION AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF 

 MOTION TO AMEND PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT

 Petitioner, Joseph Arsenault, by and through counsel, Coral M. Watt, hereby 

withdraws his Motion and Brief in Support of Motion to Amend Presentence Investigation 

Report. (docket # 672)

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Coral M. Watt P41508

Attorney for Joseph Arsenault

615 Griswold, Suite 1626

Detroit, Michigan 48226

313-963-8464

attywatt@gmail.com

Case 2:14-cr-20599-SJM-RSW ECF No. 679, PageID.3746 Filed 06/01/20 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 1st day of June, 2020, the foregoing was filed 

electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court’s 

ECF system. Parties may access this filing through the court’s system.

/s/ Coral M. Watt

 Attorney for Joseph Arsenault

Case 2:14-cr-20599-SJM-RSW ECF No. 679, PageID.3747 Filed 06/01/20 Page 2 of 2
Order entered October 5, 2021 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00779-CV 

IN RE AN ILLEGALLY DETAINED MINOR CHILD, ET AL., Relators 

Original Proceeding from the 305th Judicial District Court & the 193rd 

Judicial District Court 

Trial Court Cause Nos. JD-20-00900X & DC-21-10323 

Dallas County, Texas 

ORDER 

Before Justices Schenck, Nowell, and Garcia 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relators’ petition for 

writ of mandamus. 

 /David J. Schenck/

DAVID J. SCHENCK 

JUSTICE
# C_2012080EN.01002603.xml

| 17.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/26

---

Order of the General Court of 18 January 2012 — Otto v OHIM — Nalsani (TOTTO)

(Case T-300/11) (1)

1

2012/C 80/46

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF COMPOST AMERICA HOLDING COMPANY, INC. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
APRIL 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                          70,785
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,045
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,633,762
<PP&E>                                      12,074,916
<DEPRECIATION>                                 421,133
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,727,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       38,972,142
<BONDS>                                     16,981,658
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       16,892,754
<PREFERRED>                                      2,500
<COMMON>                                    60,367,517
<OTHER-SE>                                (76,507,745)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,727,168
<SALES>                                        317,848
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               317,848
<CGS>                                           95,484
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,484
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,388,769
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,099,241
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,781,434)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,781,434)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (915,767)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,697,201)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.34)


</TABLE>
§ 197.462 Pressure vessels and pressure piping. ( a ) The diving supervisor shall ensure that each pressure vessel, including each volume tank, cylinder and PVHO, and each pressure piping system is examined and tested as required by this section and after any repair, modification or alteration to determine that they are in satisfactory condition and fit for the service intended.
( b ) Pressure vessels and pressure piping shall be examined annually for mechanical damage or deterioration. Any defect that may impair the safety of the pressure vessel or piping shall be repaired and pressure tested to the satisfaction of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
( c ) The following tests shall be conducted at least every three years: ( 1 ) All piping permanently installed on a PVHO shall be pressure tested.
( 2 ) PVHOs subject to internal pressure shall be leak tested at the maximum allowable working pressure using the breathing mixture normally used in service.
( 3 ) Equivalent nondestructive testing may be conducted in lieu of pressure testing. Proposals to use nondestructive testing in lieu of pressure testing shall be submitted to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
( d ) Unless otherwise noted, pressure tests conducted in accordance with this section shall be either hydrostatic tests or pneumatic tests. ( 1 ) When a hydrostatic test is conducted on a pressure vessel, the test pressure shall be no less than 1.25 times the maximum allowable working pressure.
( 2 ) When a pneumatic test is conducted on a pressure vessel, the test pressure shall be the maximum allowable working pressure stamped on the nameplate.
( 3 ) When a pneumatic test is conducted on piping, the test pressure shall be no less than 90 percent of the setting of the relief device.
( 4 ) Pressure tests shall be conducted only after suitable precautions are taken to protect personnel and equipment.
( 5 ) When pressure tests are conducted on pressure vessels or pressure piping, the test pressure shall be maintained for a period of time sufficient to allow examination of all joints, connections and high stress areas.
[CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51220, Sept. 30, 1997]
# C_2011072EN.01002301.xml

| 5.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/23

---

Action brought on 7 January 2011 — Export Development Bank of Iran v Council

(Case T-5/11)

2011/C 72/39

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Export Development Bank of Iran (represented by: J.-M. Thouvenin, avocat)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul Decision 2010/644/CFSP of 25 October 2010 in so far as it concerns the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Decision 2010/644/CFSP of 25 October 2010 in so far as it concerns the applicant;

| — | annul the decision contained in the Council's letter to the applicant of 28 October 2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision contained in the Council's letter to the applicant of 28 October 2010;

| — | declare Decision 2010/413/CFSP inapplicable to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare Decision 2010/413/CFSP inapplicable to the applicant;

| — | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments put forward by the applicant are essentially identical or similar to those advanced in Case T-4/11 Export Development Bank of Iran v Council.

Export Development Bank of Iran

Council

---
# C_2014112EN.01002601.xml

| 14.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/26

---

Order of the President of the Court of 17 January 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundespatentgericht — Germany) — Hogan Lovells International LLP v Bayer CropScience K.K.

(Case C-477/12) (1)

1

2014/C 112/32

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.

1

---
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Sunnycalb, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Sunnycalb*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 26.]

(No. 98-483

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided November 25, 1998.)

*John F. Holcomb,*Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, *Daniel G. Eichel*and *Daniel J. Gattermeyer,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys, for appellee.

*Jeffrey L. Sunnycalb, pro se.*

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5125-N-18] 

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         May 4, 2007.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 7262, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 1-800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: April 26, 2007.

Mark R. Johnston,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. 07-2139 Filed 5-3-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-M
§ 31.10-19 All firefighting equipment may be tested—TB/ALL. ( a ) During the inspection of fire-fighting equipment, the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, may require fire apparatus to be tested, and used, except as provided under §§ 31.10-18(h) and 34.15-90(a) of this subchapter.
( b ) [Reserved]