alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AFS-12-019-E

October 11, 2012

 Exemption No. 10645

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-1050

Mr. Stephen Hall

Director of Operations

Maverick Airstar, LLC

P.O. Box 3297

Grand Canyon, AZ

Dear Mr. Hall:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated September 21, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) on behalf of Maverick Airstar, LLC (Maverick Airstar) for an exemption from 

§ 93.323 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, 

would relieve Maverick Airstar from the requirement to file a flight plan prior to conducting 

operations in the Grand Canyon National Park (GCNP) Special Flight Rules Area.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Maverick Airstar.

The FAA has issued a grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 10615 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that the filing of individual flight plans by Sundance Helicopters for each of its many

thousands of annual air tour flight operations over the Grand Canyon results in an extremely

large workload for Sundance Helicopters and for the flight service station (FSS) that receives 

them. Continued processing of those administrative flight plans now incurs significant costs 
2

to both Sundance Helicopters and to the Federal Government without benefit. In the interim, 

the FAA has implemented more effective efficient alternate methods of auditing allocation 

compliance. The FAA finds that it is in the public interest to reduce this paperwork burden to 

both Sundance Helicopters and to the FSS. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 10615;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 10615 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Maverick Airstar, LLC an exemption from 

14 CFR § 93.323 to the extent necessary to relieve Maverick Airstar from the requirement to 

file a flight plan prior to conducting operations in the Grand Canyon National Park Special 

Flight Rules Area.

This exemption terminates on September 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Deputy Director, Flight Standards

 Service

Enclosure
Exhibit 99.8
                             Selected Information
                      Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2000-B
                           through December 31, 2000
                    ----------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

           Class A-1        Class A-2        Class A-3        Class A-4        Class A-5        Class B          Class C
           6.59%            6.82%            6.97%            7.03%            7.07%            7.32%            7.70%
           Asset            Asset            Asset            Asset            Asset            Asset            Certificates
           Backed           Backed           Backed           Backed           Backed           Backed
           Notes            Notes            Notes            Notes            Notes            Notes
           ------------     ------------     ------------     ------------     ------------     -------------    ------------



<S>        <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>

Principal
Paid       $470,000,000.00  $          0.00  $          0.00  $          0.00  $          0.00  $          0.00   $         0.00

Interest
Paid       $ 15,056,319.43  $ 17,273,544.42  $ 14,627,803.50  $ 11,426,679.17  $  8,394,014.59  $  3,643,957.00   $ 2,190,500.25

---------------
Total Servicing Fees Paid:  $ 13,722,389.72



</TABLE>
§ 26.03-9 Voyage plans for uninspected passenger vessels of at least 100 gross tons. ( a ) The master must prepare a voyage plan that includes a crew and passenger list before taking an uninspected passenger vessel of at least 100 gross tons on a Great Lake, an ocean, or an international voyage.
( b ) Before departure, the master must communicate the voyage plan ashore, either verbally or in writing. The voyage plan must go to either the vessel's normal berthing location or a representative of the owner or managing operator of the vessel. The master, owner, or operator of the vessel must make the voyage plan available to the Coast Guard upon request.
[USCG-1999-5040, 67 FR 34777, May 15, 2002]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
March 31, 2000 unaudited financial statements and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              66,748,000
<SECURITIES>                                        72,221,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                       12,384,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (1,067,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          3,901,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   159,123,000
<PP&E>                                             132,829,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (18,713,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     299,697,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               23,444,000
<BONDS>                                            150,006,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                36,000
<OTHER-SE>                                         116,802,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       299,697,000
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    30,807,000
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       24,272,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (2,314,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        75,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4,647,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      4,127,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,819,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  2,308,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                         2,308,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                               0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0.06



</TABLE>
§ 221.79 Request for confidential treatment. ( a ) In addition to information treated as confidential under § 221.77 of this subpart, a request for confidential treatment of a document or portion thereof may be made by the Person supplying the information on the basis that the information is— ( 1 ) Confidential financial information, trade secrets, or other material exempt from disclosure by the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552);
( 2 ) Required to be held in confidence by 18 U.S.C. 1905; or
( 3 ) Otherwise exempt by law from disclosure.
( b ) The Person desiring confidential treatment must submit the request to the Hearing Officer in writing and the reasons justifying nondisclosure. The Hearing Officer shall forward any request for confidential treatment to the appropriate official of the Maritime Administration for a determination hereon. Failure to make a timely request may result in a document being considered as nonconfidential and subject to release.
( c ) Confidential material shall not be considered by the Hearing Officer in reaching a decision unless— ( 1 ) It has been furnished by a Party; or
( 2 ) It has been furnished pursuant to a subpoena.
#### § 31.35-1 Electrical installations, lighting and power equipment, batteries, etc.—TB/ALL.

All tank vessels are subject to the regulations contained in subchapter J (Electrical Engineering) of this chapter except as such regulations are modified by the regulations in this subchapter for tank vessels.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DOVER SADDLERY, INC. (the “Company”)for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers certifies, to the best knowledgeand belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Stephen L. Day /s/ Michael W. Bruns   Stephen L. Day Michael W. BrunsPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director Chief Financial Officer*(Principal Executive Officer)* *(Principal Financial Officer)*   Date: August 14, 2007 Date: August 14, 2007
#### Isaac R. Pharis, *Appellant, v.*R. Nelson Gere, Respondent.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.;

Hardin, J., not sitting.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending July 15, 2006

----

EnforcementBanco Industrial de Venezuela, C.A., Caracas, Venezuela, and its agencies in New York, New York, and Miami, Florida  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, New York State Banking Department, and State of Florida Office of Financial Regulation; and termination of a written agreement dated April 21, 2005, by and among the same organizations.					-Announced, July 14, 2006 					

FormsForms  -- final Board review to extend with revision the Report of Transaction Accounts, Other Deposits and Vault Cash (FR 2900), Annual Report of Total Deposits and Reservable Liabilities (FR 2910a), Report of Foreign (Non-U.S.) Currency Deposits (FR 2915), and Allocation of Low Reserve Tranche and Reservable Liabilities Exemption (FR 2930 and FR 2930a).					-Approved, July 13, 2006 					

Regulations And PoliciesMonetary Policy  -- report to Congress.					-Authorized, July 11, 2006 					

Testimony And StatementsIndustrial Loan Companies  -- statement by Scott G. Alvarez, General Counsel, before the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and Consumer Credit of the House Committee on Financial Services, July 12, 2006.					-Published, July 12, 2006 					Monetary Policy Objectives  -- statement by Chairman Bernanke before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs on July 19, 2006, and before the House Committee on Financial Services on July 20.					-Authorized, July 14, 2006 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: July 20, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 83 (Tuesday, May 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 23840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2134]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel, April 18, 2007, 9 a.m. 
to April 19, 2007, 5 p.m., Courtyard by Marriott Rockville, 2500 
Research Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20850 which was published in the 
Federal Register on April 16, 2007, Volume 72, Number 72.
    The date and location of the meeting was changed to May 9-10, 2007, 
Hilton Washington, DC/Rockville Executive Meeting Center, 1750 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: April 23, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2134 Filed 4-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 149 (Monday, August 4, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 45124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18426]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

42 CFR Part 447

Payments for Services

CFR Correction

0
In Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 430 to 481, 
revised as of October 1, 2013, on page 403, remove the undesignated 
center heading above Sec.  447.88.

[FR Doc. 2014-18426 Filed 8-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Snoden, Barbara (OSn

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Hi Ms. Wolters,

c~--

Snoden, Barbara (OSn

Tuesday, November 2S, 2014 4:26 PM

'JoAnn Wolters'

Chief Pilot Information

Can you please submit a statement noting Mr. Delong's citizenship and his compliance disposition in regards to Section

204.37

Happy Thanksgiving to you and your family!

Barbara

Barbara A. Snoden

Transportation Industry Analyst

US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

202-366-4834

1
#### Laurence Ennis, *Appellant, v.*Edward P. Wilder, Respondent, *Impleaded, etc*.

Order modified as directed in opinion, without costs to either party. Opinion by

Brady, J.
Type Public Traded as NYSE: WEC (http://www.nyse.com/about/listed/lcddata.html? ticker=wec) S&P 500 Component Industry Diversified Utilities Founded 1987 Headquarters Milwaukee, Wisconsin, U.S. Key people Gale E. Klappa, Chairman, CEO, and President Revenue $4.43 billion USD (2008) Employees 4,545 (2009) Website http://www.wisconsinenergy.com 

### Wisconsin Energy Corporation 

# Wisconsin Energy Corporation From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Wisconsin Energy Corporation , based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin serves more than 1.1 million electric customers in Wisconsin and Michigan's Upper Peninsula and more than 1 million natural gas customers in Wisconsin through its utility subsidiary, We Energies. Other subsidiaries are We Power, which designs, builds and owns electric generating plants; and Wispark, LLC, which develops and invests in real estate, industrial/offi ce buildings and urban redevelopment projects. The corporation and utility headquarters are located at 231 W. Michigan Street in Milwaukee.



## Contents 1 Utility companies ■ 1.1 Wisconsin Electric Power Company ■ 2 History ■ 3 Nonutility companies ■ 3.1 We Power, LLC ■ 3.2 Wispark, LLC ■ 4 Primergy merger ■ 5 Tax criticism ■ 6 References ■ 7 External links ■ 

## Utility companies Wisconsin Electric Power Company Wisconsin Electric Power Company, which does busine ss as We Energies, provides electrical service for over one million customers, primarily located in southeastern and eastern Wisconsin as well as the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. We Energies also s upplies nearly one million natural gas customers located throughout the state of Wisconsin. Pa g e 1 of 6 Wisconsin Ener gyCorporation - Wikipedia, the free enc y clopedia

7/17/2013 htt p ://en.wiki p edia.or g/wiki/Wisconsin

_Energy_ Cor p oration
§ 327.29 Effect of other payments to claimant. The total amount to which the claimant may be entitled is normally computed as follows: ( a ) The total amount of the loss, damage, or personal injury suffered for which the United States is liable, less any payment the claimant has received from the following sources: ( 1 ) The military member or civilian employee who caused the incident;
( 2 ) The military member's or civilian employee's insurer; and
( 3 ) Any joint tort-feasor or insurer.
( b ) No deduction is generally made for any payment the claimant has received by way of voluntary contributions, such as donations of charitable organizations.
#### § 30.10-59 Reid vapor pressure—TB/ALL.

The term *Reid vapor pressure* means the vapor pressure of a liquid at a temperature of 100 °F., expressed in pounds per square inch absolute, as determined by the *Reid Method* as described in the American Society for Testing Materials Standard D 323 (incorporated by reference, see § 30.01-3), Method of Test for Vapor Pressure of Petroleum Products. This Standard is available at Headquarters for reading purposes or it may be purchased from the Society at 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16657, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by USCG-2000-7790, 65 FR 58458, Sept. 29, 2000]
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 245 (Thursday, December 21, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 76687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9796]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ES-960-1420-BJ-TRST] Group No. 23, Maine


Eastern States: Filing of Plat of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Maine.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, 
Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in 
the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston 
Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was requested by the Bureau of 
Indian Affairs.
    The lands we surveyed are:

Township 2, Range 8, North of Waldo Patent (T. 2, R. 8, N. W. P.), 
Penobscot County, Maine

    The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey and survey of 
the boundaries of lands held in trust for the Penobscot Indian Nation 
in Township 2, Range 8, North of Waldo Patent Penobscot County, Maine 
and was accepted December 8, 2006. We will place a copy of the plat we 
described in the open files. It will be available to the public as a 
matter of information. If BLM receives a protest against this survey, 
as shown in the plat, prior to the date of the official filing, we will 
stay the filing pending our consideration of the protest.
    We will not officially file the plat until the day after we have 
accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, 
including decisions on appeals.

    Dated: December 14, 2006.
Michael W. Young,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 06-9796 Filed 12-20-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOSEPH DUNBAR,

 Plaintiff,

 

v. Case No. 2:15-cv-11573

 Hon. Denise Page Hood

DANIEL HEYNS, ET AL.,

Defendants.

_______________________________________/

OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

This is a civil action in which Plaintiff seeks relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, 28

U.S.C. § 1915, and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 1985. Plaintiff Joseph Dunbar, who

is incarcerated at the Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility, asserts in his pro se

complaint that he is entitled to his immediate release and $3,000,000 in damages. The

complaint appears to allege that: 1) the Michigan Department of Corrections

(“MDOC”) believes that Petitioner is serving a 40-to-60 year sentence where his true

sentence is 20-to40 years; 2) Plaintiff is in imminent danger because he is innocent;

3) MDOC Officials intentionally injected Hepatitis C into Plaintiff; 4) MDOC

Officials placed a dangerous prisoner in his cell to attack him; 5) Plaintiff is not

receiving any medical treatment; 6) MDOC Officials have threatened to “shoot him

2:15-cv-11573-DPH-RSW Doc # 18 Filed 10/08/15 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 215
up with medicine to shut him up;” 7) Plaintiff is being threatened by other inmates;

and 8) MDOC Officials are not processing his grievances. 

On May 6, 2015, the Court issued two Orders to Correct Deficiency [Dkt. Nos.

4 and 5] because Plaintiff failed to submit the filing fee or an application to proceed

without prepaying fees or costs, and because he failed to file a sufficient number of

copies of his complaint to serve on all twenty-one Defendants. The Court required

Plaintiff to correct the deficiencies within 30 days. The Court cautioned Plaintiff that

if he failed to correct the filing deficiencies, then the complaint would be subject to

dismissal for want of prosecution. Plaintiff filed an insufficient and incomplete

application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs. [Dkt. No. 7]. The filing does

not include an authorization to withdraw funds from his prison trust fund account, nor

does it does contain a certified account statement. Plaintiff has also not filed the

additional copies of his complaint required for service. The time for correcting the

deficiencies have long since elapsed.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint [Dkt. No. 1] is DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE for want of prosecution.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Order to Have Clerk Copy By

Complaint for Service by the US Marshal [Dkt. No. 6] is DENIED as MOOT.

2

2:15-cv-11573-DPH-RSW Doc # 18 Filed 10/08/15 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 216
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion /Request for Transfer to Federal

Prison or Correctional Facility [Dkt. No. 9, 11] is DENIED as Moot.

S/Denise Page Hood 

Denise Page Hood

United States District Judge

Dated: October 8, 2015

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of

record on October 8, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/LaShawn Saulsberry 

Case Manager

3

2:15-cv-11573-DPH-RSW Doc # 18 Filed 10/08/15 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 217