CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

– Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: SJVUAPCD

Rule No(s): 46 9 4 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Rule Originallly Adopted December 15, 2005

SIP Submittal Amend ment Approved August 18 , 2011

Rule Title(s): Wine Fermentation and Storage Tanks

Date Submitted to ARB: August 2 5 , 2011

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): Adopted December 15, 2005

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Lisa Van de Water Phone Number: ( 559 ) 230

- 61 00 E

- mail Address: lisa.vandewater @valleyair.org

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

Amendments to the SIP Submittal for Rule 46 9 4 removes the wine fermentaion provisions from EPA consideration

and inclusion in the SIP. Removal of the wine fermentation provisions corresponds to EPA comments that no

reasonably available control technology exists for wine fermentation. Although the se provisions will be removed

from the SIP, they will remain locally enforceable

.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach refere nce(s) for emission

factor(s) and other information. At tach calculation sheet showing how the emission information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: N/A

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: N/A Area Affected: SJV Air Basin

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :

N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission foreca sting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 15

Perc ent in Nonattainment Area: 100 %

Number of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 3 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100 %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Ru le (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : E & J Gallo Winery (Livingston, Merced Co.); E & J Gallo Winery (Fresno, Fresno Co.); Delicato Vineyards, Inc.

(Manteca, San Joaquin Co.)

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include E mission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: Work practice standards, reductions in surplus

emissions from alternative emission sources, and payment into a District managed air quality mitigation fund

.

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): N/A Work Practice Standards in Section(s): 5. 2

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): 6. 4 Reporting Requirements in Section(s): N/A5/1/2002 CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: Emission reductions from wine fermentation and storage are commitments contained in the District's 2003

PM10 Plan and Extreme Ozone Attainement Demonstration Plan. This amendment leaves the rule in full effect at the

local level

.