alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 176.660 Continued participation in the Alternative Hull Examination (AHE) Program. ( a ) To continue to participate in the AHE Program, vessel operators must conduct an annual hull condition assessment. At a minimum, vessel operators must conduct an internal examination and take random hull gaugings internally during the hull condition assessment, unless waived by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI). If the annual hull assessment reveals significant damage or corrosion, where temporary repairs have been made, or where other critical areas of concern have been identified, the OCMI may require an expanded examination to include an underwater hull examination using divers. If an underwater examination is required, the examination must focus on areas at higher risk of damage or corrosion and must include a representative sampling of hull gaugings.
( b ) If an underwater survey is required for the annual hull condition assessment, the OCMI may require the presence of a third party examiner and a written hull examination report must be submitted to the OCMI. This report must include thickness gauging results, a copy of the audio and video recordings and any other information that will help the OCMI evaluate your vessel for continued participation in the AHE program. The third party examiner must sign the report and confirm the validity of its contents.
( c ) You must submit your preventive maintenance reports or checklists on an annual basis to the OCMI. These reports or checklists must conform to the plans you submitted in your application under § 176.630 of this part, which the OCMI approved.
( d ) Prior to each scheduled annual hull condition assessment— ( 1 ) The owner may submit to the OCMI a plan for conducting the assessment, or a request for a waiver of this requirement, no fewer than 30 days before the scheduled assessment; and
( 2 ) The OCMI may reduce the scope or extend the interval of the assessment if the operational, casualty, and deficiency history of the vessel, along with a recommendation of the vessel's master, indicates that it is warranted.
[USCG-2000-6858, 67 FR 21086, Apr. 29, 2002, as amended at 69 FR 47384, Aug. 5, 2004]
#### § 30.10-37 Keel laying date—TB/ALL.

The term *keel laying date* means the date upon which progressive construction identifiable with a specific vessel begins, including construction of the first module or prefabricated section of the hull that is identifiable with that vessel.

[CGD 74-127, 41 FR 3843, Jan. 26, 1976]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

AFS/IBEX, A DIVISION OF 

METABANK, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

v. 

 Case No.: 15-cv-11409 

Honorable Gershwin A. Drain

TRAVELERS PROPERTY 

CASUALTY COMPANY OF 

AMERICA, et al., 

 

 Defendants. 

___________________________/ 

 

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT KAREN LARSON TO PROVIDE 

STATUS UPDATES REGARDING PROBATE PROCEEDINGS 

 On September 1, 2017, this Court entered an Order Setting Deadlines. See

Dkt. No. 180. The Court’s September 1, 2017 Order required Defendant Karen 

Larson to hire an attorney and initiate probate proceedings for her husband, 

Defendant Keith Larson, no later than September 6, 2017. 

 On September 6, 2017, counsel for Defendant Karen Larson contacted the 

Court and indicated that Ms. Larson had hired an attorney to open her husband’s 

probate estate, but did not have the financial means to pay the retainer fee. As 

such, the Court will require counsel for Defendant Karen Larson to provide a status 
2

update on September 15, 2017, and September 30, 2017, concerning the probate 

proceedings. The update may be submitted directly to Judge Drain’s chambers and 

need not be filed on CM/ECF. A copy of the status update must be served on 

counsel for Plaintiff-Assignees/Cross-Claimants forthwith. 

 SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 14, 2017 /s/Gershwin A. Drain 

 GERSHWIN A. DRAIN 

 United States District Judge 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record 

by electronic and/or ordinary mail. 

/s/ Tanya Bankston 

Deputy Clerk
---





- **Seasonally adjusted**
ASCII
      
Screen Reader



- **Not seasonally adjusted**

**Major holders**
	ASCII
	      
	Screen Reader
		**Commercial banks**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader**Finance companies**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader**Credit unions**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader**Federal government and Sallie Mae**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader**Savings institutions**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader**Nonfinancial business**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader**Pools of securitized assets**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader**Major types of credit**
	ASCII
	      
	Screen Reader
		**Revolving**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader**Nonrevolving**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader**Terms of credit**
	ASCII
	      
	Screen Reader
- **Major holders**
	ASCII
	      
	Screen Reader
		**Commercial banks**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader**Finance companies**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader**Credit unions**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader**Federal government and Sallie Mae**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader**Savings institutions**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader**Nonfinancial business**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader**Pools of securitized assets**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader
- **Commercial banks**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader
- **Finance companies**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader
- **Credit unions**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader
- **Federal government and Sallie Mae**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader
- **Savings institutions**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader
- **Nonfinancial business**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader
- **Pools of securitized assets**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader
- **Major types of credit**
	ASCII
	      
	Screen Reader
		**Revolving**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader**Nonrevolving**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader
- **Revolving**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader
- **Nonrevolving**
		ASCII
		      
		Screen Reader
- **Terms of credit**
	ASCII
	      
	Screen Reader

Release dates |
Historical data | 
Data Download Program (DDP) | Announcements

Statistical releases

---

Home Economic research and data  Accessibility Contact Us  Last update: March 7, 2011
# C_2013225EN.01005606.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/56

---

Order of the President of the Ninth Chamber of the Court of 23 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Edgar Brück v Agentur für Arbeit Villingen-Schwenningen — Familienkasse

(Case C-126/12) (1)

1

2013/C 225/110

Language of the case: German

The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 184, 23.6.2012.

1

---
New Jersey Department of Labor, Workmen’s Compensation Bureau.

#### ANDREW KAPALO, PETITIONER, v. THREE STAR CAP COMPANY, RESPONDENT.

Por the petitioner, *Richard F. Potter.*

For the respondent, *Carl S.*Kuebler, of *McDermott, En-right. & Carpenter.*

íjt $ í|í ^ i

I listened to the testimony carefully and I do find that on September 10th, 1927, between the hours of three and four p. it. the petitioner, while carrying a roll of cloth, slipped and fell; that he had a pain in his stomach; that he sat down and rested for fifteen or twenty minutes and after-wards was taken home. He testified that the following afternoon, Sunday, September 11th, his father called in a physician, Dr. Guttman, who came about three-thirty o’clock and examined him and prescribed medicine. He was confronted with a signed statement by the defense which ho admitted that he signed. He was not sure, however, whether the statement had been read to him before he signed it, and he denied the statement contained therein that Dr. Guttman called at seven p. it. The statement was marked for identification. He testified that the doctor returned Monday morning, found a lump on his right side and advised an operation, and that he went to the hospital and was operated on that day by Dr. Clarke, returning to work six weeks thereafter.

The petitioner was specifically asked by his attorney whether he saw or felt anything wrong with his stomach, and he said that he did not; that it hurt him terribfy but that *694there was nothing outside that he conld see until Monday morning, when he felt a lump come out on his right side.

His foreman was called and testified as to the assistance which he gave Mr. Kapalo. He saw Mr. Kapalo sign the statement, but was not present and did not know whether it was read to him or not.

Dr. Guttman ivas called and testified that he came sometime Sunday afternoon and that his best recollection was that he got there about three-thirty o’clock; that the petitioner was complaining of abdominal pain and vomiting; that he did not ascertain just what the trouble was at that time, but prescribed medicine; that he examined his abdomen but found no visible evidence; that he returned the following morning, found a small hernia on his right side and recommended immediate operation.

At the close of his testimony, respondent moved to dismiss the petition, because the descent of the hernia did not immediately follow the cause, because there was no prostration, because the attendance of a licensed physician was not required within twenty-four hours after the occurrence of the hernia.

After considering the testimony carefully, I do find that the descent of the hernia did not immediately follow the cause and do therefore find that the petition should be dismissed.

* *i\t** * * * *

Charles E. Corbih, *Deputy Commissioner.*
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NetSolve, Incorporated (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth C. Kieley, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Kenneth C. KieleyName: Kenneth C. Kieley Title:   Chief Financial Officer




September 9, 2003



*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 182.510 Bilge piping system. ( a ) A vessel of at least 7.9 meters (26 feet) in length must be provided with individual bilge lines and bilge suctions for each watertight compartment, except that the space forward of the collision bulkhead need not be fitted with a bilge suction line when the arrangement of the vessel is such that ordinary leakage may be removed from this compartment by the use of a hand portable bilge pump or other equipment, and such equipment is provided.
( b ) A bilge pipe in a vessel of not more than 19.8 meters (65 feet) in length must be not less than 25 millimeters (1 inch) nominal pipe size. A bilge pipe in a vessel of more than 19.8 meters (65 feet) in length must be not less than 40 millimeters (1.5 inches) nominal pipe size. A bilge suction must be fitted with a suitable strainer having an open area not less than three times the area of the bilge pipe.
( c ) Except when individual pumps are provided for separate spaces, individual bilge suction lines must be led to a central control point or manifold and provided with a stop valve at the control point or manifold and a check valve at some accessible point in the bilge line. A stop-check valve located at a control point or manifold will meet the requirements for both a stop valve and a check valve.
( d ) A bilge pipe piercing the collision bulkhead must be fitted with a screw-down valve located on the forward side of the collision bulkhead and operable from the weather deck, or, if it is readily accessible under service conditions, a screw-down valve without a reach rod may be fitted to the bilge line on the after side of the collision bulkhead.
# C_2011179EN.01002102.xml

| 18.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/21

---

Action brought on 8 March 2011 — ZZ v Council

(Case F-26/11)

2011/C 179/35

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to include the applicant in the list of those promoted to grade AD 13 in the 2010 promotion exercise, and an order that the defendant pay to the applicant a sum in compensation for the non-material damage suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the appointing authority not to include the applicant in the list of those promoted to grade AD 13 in the 2010 promotion exercise, as that decision was made known in the Staff Note No 80/10 of 26 April 2010 and the Staff Note No 81/10 of 26 May 2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the appointing authority not to include the applicant in the list of those promoted to grade AD 13 in the 2010 promotion exercise, as that decision was made known in the Staff Note No 80/10 of 26 April 2010 and the Staff Note No 81/10 of 26 May 2010;

| — | annul, as necessary, the decision of the appointing authority rejecting the applicant’s complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul, as necessary, the decision of the appointing authority rejecting the applicant’s complaint;

| — | annul, as necessary, the decision to promote AD 12 officials promoted to grade AD 13 in the 2010 promotion exercise (Staff Note No 80/10 of 26 April 2010 and the Staff Note No 81/10 of 26 May 2010); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul, as necessary, the decision to promote AD 12 officials promoted to grade AD 13 in the 2010 promotion exercise (Staff Note No 80/10 of 26 April 2010 and the Staff Note No 81/10 of 26 May 2010);

| — | order the defendant to pay to the applicant the sum of EUR 150 000 in compensation for non-material damage suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay to the applicant the sum of EUR 150 000 in compensation for non-material damage suffered;

| — | order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

---
# C_2013344EN.01002701.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/27

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Peter Pinckney v KDG Mediatech AG

(Case C-170/12) (1)

1

(Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Jurisdiction - Matters relating to tort, delict and quasi-delict - Copyright - Material support reproducing a protected work - Placing on line - Determination of the place where the harmful event occurred)

2013/C 344/45

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Peter Pinckney

Applicant:

Defendant: KDG Mediatech AG

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Cour de cassation — Interpretation of Article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1) — Jurisdiction of the national court in matters of tort, delict and quasi-delict — Criteria for determining the place where the harmful event occurred or may occur — Infringement of copyright caused by the placing on-line of dematerialised content or a material carrier medium reproducing the content — Content directed at the public

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that, in the event of alleged infringement of copyrights protected by the Member State of the court seised, the latter has jurisdiction to hear an action to establish liability brought by the author of a work against a company established in another Member State and which has, in the latter State, reproduced that work on a material support which is subsequently sold by companies established in a third Member State through an internet site also accessible with the jurisdiction of the court seised. That court has jurisdiction only to determine the damage caused in the Member State within which it is situated.

---

(1)  OJ C 174, 16.6.2012.

1

---
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending February 24, 2007

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                             | End of Comment Period                                  
|----------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|HNB BANCORP INC   | 3A1            | HNB Bancorp, Inc, Halifax, PA, to form a bank holding company by acquiring 100% of the voting shares of Halifax National Bank, Halifax, PA. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | Not applicable
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Second Quarter of 2007 (April 1, 2007 - June 30, 2007)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 27.101 Definitions. As used in this part— *Accommodation* includes any: ( 1 ) Messroom.
( 2 ) Lounge.
( 3 ) Sitting area.
( 4 ) Recreation room.
( 5 ) Quarters.
( 6 ) Toilet space.
( 7 ) Shower room.
( 8 ) Galley.
( 9 ) Berthing facility.
( 10 ) Clothing-changing room.
*Engine room* means the enclosed area where any main-propulsion engine is located. It comprises all deck levels within that area.
*Fixed fire-extinguishing system* means: ( 1 ) A carbon dioxide system that satisfies 46 CFR 76.15 and the system labeling requirements in 46 CFR 78.47-9 and 78.47-11 and that is approved by the Commandant; or
( 2 ) A clean-agent system that satisfies 46 CFR 95.16 and is approved by the Commandant; or
( 3 ) A manually-operated water-mist system that satisfies NFPA 750 (incorporated by reference; see § 27.102) and that is approved by the Commandant; or
*Fleeting-area* means a separate location where individual barges are moored or assembled to make a tow. The barges are not in transport, but are temporarily marshaled, waiting for pickup by different vessels that will transport them to various destinations. A fleeting-area is a limited geographic area.
*Harbor-assist* means docking and undocking ships.
*Limited geographic area* means a local area of operation, usually within a single harbor or port. The local Captain of the Port (COTP) determines the definition of local geographic area for each zone.
*Operating station* means the principal steering station on the vessel, from which the vessel is normally navigated.
*Towing vessel* means a commercial vessel engaged in, or intending to engage in, pulling, pushing, or hauling alongside, or any combination of pulling, pushing, or hauling alongside.
*Towing vessel in inland service* means a towing vessel that is not in ocean or coastal service.
*Towing vessel in ocean or coastal service* means a towing vessel that operates beyond the baseline of the U.S. territorial sea.
*We* means the United States Coast Guard.
*Work space* means any area on the vessel where the crew could be present while on duty and performing their assigned tasks.
*You* means the owner of a towing vessel, unless otherwise specified.
[USCG-2000-6931, 69 FR 34069, June 18, 2004, as amended by USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33872, June 7, 2012; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60145, Sept. 30, 2013]
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134123 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 134123 

 COA: 274704 

Oakland CC: 92-116026-FC 

MICHAEL PALADINO,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 21, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d1119 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2007 

 Clerk
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending November 19, 2005

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us