alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. THE EASTERN TRANSPORTATION LINE, Appellants, *v.*THE COMMISSIONERS OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondents. SAME *v.*THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondents.

*The taxes imposed by chap.*542 *of*1880 *are only for State purposes*— *corporations are not relieved thereby from county or municipal taxes.*

The taxes imposed upon corporations by chapter 542 of 1880 are for the exclusive benefit of the State, and the act does not interfere with the power of the local authorities to impose further taxation upon the same corporations for municipal and county purposes.

Appeal from an order made at a Special Term, confirming an assessment made npon a hearing npon the return to a writ of *certiorari.*

*Gray <& Dmenport,*for the appellants.

*George P. Andrews,*for the respondents.

Daniels, J.:

The controlling point in this case has been determined by the decision made by the General Term of the second department in the case of the *People ex rel. Westchester Fire Insurance Company*v. *Davenport amd others*(25 Hun, 630). It was there held that chapter 542 of the Laws of 1880 included only taxes imposed for the exclusive benefit of the State, and that it did not interfere with the power of the local authorities to impose further taxation upon the same corporation for municipal and county purposes. The case is in no material respect distinguishable from the one presented by this appeal, although some of the facts may have differed in that controversy from the one now presented. For the point arising on them is precisely the same, and the enactment of chapter 332 of the Laws of 1881, declaratory of the effect of the preceding enactment, in no manner impairs or diminishes the effect of that deci*447sion. A proper degree of respect for the determination made by a co-ordinate tribunal upon the same controverted point requires that the decision so made shall be accepted and followed in this case. In no other way can a proper degree of judicial decorum and consistency be maintained. It is unnecessary, therefore," to follow the argument made in support of the appeal, for this decision must be regarded as entirely controlling upon this court.

Other authorities have been cited leading to the same practical result. But it is unnecessary to refer more particularly to them for the reason already stated.

The order in this case and in that of the same relator against the board of aldermen must therefore be affirmed.

Davis, P. J., and Brady, J., concurred.

Orders affirmed, with costs.
#### § 308.545 Facultative cargo policy, Form MA-316.

The standard form of War Risk Facultative Cargo Policy, Form MA-316, may be obtained from MARAD's underwriting agent or MARAD.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

SECTION 302CERTIFICATION

 

I,Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr. certify that:

 

1.               I have read this annual report on Form 10-KSBof Northern California Bancorp, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this annual reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this annual report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)              designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;

 

b)             evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period(the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)              presented in this annual report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee or registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

2.               all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and

 

3.               any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changesin internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affectinternal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.

 
| Date: March 19, 2004 | /s/ Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr |   |
|---------------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                      | Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr.    |
|                      | Chairman of the Board &    |
|                      | Chief Executive Officer        |

 

----
#### § 294.25 National security modifications.

A participant agrees to the installation onboard its Fleet Vessel of militarily useful features for national defense purposes as approved by U.S. Coast Guard and the vessel's classification society.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

CARON ADAMS, 

Petitioner, 

 vs. 

DWAYNE BURTON, 

Respondent. 

4:15-CV-11685-TGB-MKM 

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the opinion and order entered on today’s 

date, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that the case is DISMISSED 

WITH PREJUDICE. 

 Dated at Detroit, Michigan: March 14, 2023. 

      

KINIKIA ESSEX 

CLERK OF THE COURT 

 s/A. Chubb 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk 

APPROVED: 

s/Terrence G. Berg 

HON. TERRENCE G. BERG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:15-cv-11685-TGB-MKM ECF No. 23, PageID.755 Filed 03/14/23 Page 1 of 1
§ 25.30-5 General provisions. ( a ) Where equipment in this subpart is required to be of an approved type, such equipment requires the specific approval of the Commandant. Such approvals are published in the Federal Register, and in addition, are contained in Coast Guard publication COMDTINST M16714.3 (Series), Equipment Lists.
( b ) All hand portable fire extinguishers, semiportable fire extinguishing systems, and fixed fire extinguishing systems shall be of an approved type.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16653, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50726, Sept. 27, 1996]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Bobby
Yazdani, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Saba Software, Inc. (the Company) hereby certify, as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended
February 28, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.

Date: April 9, 2010



By:

/s/    BOBBY YAZDANIBobby Yazdani
Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40781

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GILBERTO REGALADO RAMIREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-98-CR-207-1

- - - - - - - - - -

April 16, 1999

Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Gilberto Regalado Ramirez moves

to withdraw as appellate counsel and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ramirez

did not file a response to counsel’s motion. We have

independently reviewed counsel’s brief and the record and found

no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
EXHIBIT
10.1


 


IMMUNICON
CORPORATION


 


COMPENSATION
POLICY FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS


 


Effective January 28,
2005, the equity compensation of the Company’s non-employee directors is as
follows:


 


•                       Upon
election to the Company’s Board of Directors, a new director will receive an
option to purchase 20,000 shares of the common stock of the Company.


 


•                       Each
director will receive an annual option to purchase 10,000 shares of the common
stock of the Company.


 


•                       Each
director who chairs a committee of the Company’s Board of Directors will
receive an annual option to purchase 4,000 shares of the common stock of the
Company.


 


Effective January 28,
2005, the cash compensation of the Company’s non-employee directors is as
follows:


 


•                       $12,000
annual cash retainer for each director.


 


•                       $8,000
annual cash retainer for the Audit and Compliance Committee chair.


 


•                       $4,000
annual cash retainer for the Compensation Committee chair.


 


•                       $4,000
annual cash retainer for the Nominating and Governance Committee chair.


 


•                       $2,000
meeting fee for each director for each meeting of the Company’s Board of
Directors attended in person.


 


•                       $500
meeting fee for each director for each meeting of the Company’s Board of
Directors attended via conference telephone.


 


•                       $500
meeting fee for each committee member for each meeting of a committee of the
Company’s Board of Directors, attended in person or via conference telephone.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

November 14, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549

Re: CEO Certification of Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.s quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2002, filed on
November 14, 2002.

In accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed into law on July 30,
2002, and in connection with the filing of our quarterly report on Form 10-Q
for the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2002, we represent that
(i) we have read the report, (ii) to our knowledge, the report does not contain
a material misstatement or omission, (iii) to our knowledge, the financial
statements and other financial information included in the report present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pac-West Telecomm,
Inc., the Company and, (iv) we have designed the Companys internal controls
in such a way as to ensure that we are aware of all material information
related to the Company. Where necessary, we are implementing actions to
improve our internal controls and have communicated these actions to the
Companys auditors and audit committee.

Sincerely,

/s/   Wallace W. Griffin

Wallace W. Griffin
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer





---



##### 



November 14, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549

Re: CFO Certification of Pac-West Telecomm, Inc.s quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2002, filed on
November 14, 2002.

In accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed into law on July 30,
2002, and in connection with the filing of our quarterly report on Form 10-Q
for the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2002, we represent that
(i) we have read the report, (ii) to our knowledge, the report does not contain
a material misstatement or omission, (iii) to our knowledge, the financial
statements and other financial information included in the report present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Pac-West Telecomm,
Inc., the Company and, (iv) we have designed the Companys internal controls
in such a way as to ensure that we are aware of all material information
related to the Company. Where necessary, we are implementing actions to
improve our internal controls and have communicated these actions to the
Companys auditors and audit committee.

Sincerely,

/s/   H. Ravi Brar

H. Ravi Brar
Chief Financial Officer
#### § 170.093 Specific approvals.

Certain rules in this subchapter require specific approval of equipment or arrangements by the Commandant, OCMI, or Coast Guard Marine Safety Center. These approval determinations will be made as a part of the plan review process.

[CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51217, Sept. 30, 1997, as amended by USCG-2007-0030, 75 FR 78083, Dec. 14, 2010]
§ 28.885 Cargo gear. ( a ) The safe working load (SWL) for the assembled gear shall be marked on the heel of each cargo boom, crane, or derrick. These letters and figures are to be in contrasting colors to the background and at least one inch in height. The SWL is construed to be the load the gear is approved to lift, excluding the weight of the gear itself.
( b ) All wire rope, chains, rings, hooks, links, shackles, swivels, blocks, and any other loose gear used or intended to be used in cargo loading or unloading must be commensurable with the SWL rating in paragraph (a) of this section. This gear shall be visually inspected by the vessel's captain or his designee at frequent intervals, and in any event not less than once in each operating month.
( c ) In addition to the inspection required in paragraph (b) of this section, a biennial, (every second year), thorough examination and proof load test, at a minimum of the SWL rating, shall be performed and witnessed by competent personnel. The proof load applied to the winches, booms, derricks, cranes and all associated gear shall be lifted with the ship's normal tackle with the boom or derrick at the lowest practicable angle. When the load has been lifted, it shall be swung as far as possible in both directions.
( d ) After satisfactory completion of the tests and examinations required in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, all results and notations together with the date and location of each shall be maintained and available to Coast Guard representatives upon request.
#### § 204.10 Attorney's fees.

Attorney's fees for any claim settled under this part are limited to not more than twenty percent of the amount paid in settlement.
#### § 24.20-1 Marine engineering details.

All marine engineering details relative to the design, construction, and testing of boilers and machinery on steam-propelled motorboats of over 40 feet in length will be found in subchapter F (Marine Engineering) of this chapter.

[USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59775, Oct. 1, 2012]
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2504 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an increase in the 

annual amount authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out comprehensive service programs for homeless 

veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2009 

Mr. TEAGUE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an 

increase in the annual amount authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry 

out comprehensive service programs for homeless veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AMOUNT AUTHORIZED TO BE AP4 PROPRIATED FOR COMPREHENSIVE SERVICE 

5 PROGRAMS FOR HOMELESS VETERANS. 

6 Section 2013 of title 38, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2504 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2007’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘fiscal year 2010’’; and 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘$150,000,000’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘$200,000,000’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Election Assistance Commission

# AGENCY:

United States Election Assistance Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting. 

# Date and Time:

Wednesday, April 18, 2007, 1 p.m.-4 p.m.

# Place:

Westin Crown Center, Room: Washington Park 3, One East Pershing Road, Kansas City, Missouri 64108, (816) 474-4400.

# Agenda:

The Commission will receive a presentation on and consider adopting a Spanish translation glossary of election terminology. The Commission will elect a vice-chair and will receive a presentation on the development of its election management guidelines. The Commission will also consider other administrative matters.

This meeting will be open to the public.

# Person to Contact for Information:

Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 566-3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,

Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-1943 Filed 4-16-07; 1:46 pm]

BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M
§ 195.01-1 General. ( a ) The provisions of this part shall apply to all vessels except as specifically noted in this part.
# C_2013344EN.01003502.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/35

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad — Bulgaria) — Proceedings initiated by Siegfried János Schneider

(Case C-386/12) (1)

1

(Jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters - Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Scope - Legal capacity of natural persons - Exclusive jurisdiction in matters relating to rights in rem in immovable property - Scope - Non-contentious proceedings concerning the right of a person who has been placed under guardianship and is domiciled in a Member State to dispose of immovable property situated in another Member State)

2013/C 344/61

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Referring court

Sofiyski gradski sad

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Siegfried János Schneider

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Sofiyski gradski sad — Interpretation of Article 22(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1) — Natural person lacking full legal capacity in accordance with the law of his Member State — Application submitted by that person in another Member State, with his guardian’s approval, for permission to sell immovable property inherited in that State — Jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State in which the property is situated — Whether Article 22(1) of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 applies in non-contentious proceedings

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters and, in particular, Article 22(1) thereof must be interpreted as not applying to non-contentious proceedings by which a national of a Member State who has been declared to be lacking full legal capacity and placed under guardianship in accordance with the law of that State applies to a court in another Member State for authorisation to sell his share of a property situated in that other Member State, in view of the fact that such proceedings are concerned with the ‘legal capacity of natural persons’ for the purposes of Article 1(2)(a) of Regulation No 44/2001, a matter which falls outside the material scope of that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 13.10.2012.

1

---