alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 390.4 Description of the agreement. ( a ) *In general.* The agreement consists of a standard part and appended schedules. The standard part of the agreement contains recitals, covenants and warranties which apply to all parties. The appended schedules set forth the particular program of the party and contain other information unique to each agreement. See § 390.6 (relating to administration of the agreement) for procedures and criteria for the modification of schedules.
( b ) *Schedule A—Eligible agreement vessels.* Schedule A lists the names of eligible agreement vessels (as defined in § 390.5), whether owned or leased, and the allowable percentage of the depreciation ceiling, if any, available for deposit purposes by the party. See § 390.7 (relating to deposits) for allowable depreciation in the case of leased vessels.
( c ) *Schedule B—Program* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Schedule B sets forth the program of the party including the cost of the program and the time in which the program shall be accomplished.
( 2 ) *Items in Schedule B.* Schedule B shall contain: ( i ) A statement describing each qualified agreement vessel (as defined in § 390.5) to be acquired, constructed or reconstructed. In the case of reconstruction, the statement will include a general description of the work to be performed;
( ii ) The anticipated date on which the acquisition, construction or reconstruction of each qualified agreement vessel will commence;
( iii ) The anticipated total cost, including any costs which will not be paid from the fund, of the acquisition, construction or reconstruction of each qualified agreement vessel; and
( iv ) The amount to be withdrawn from the fund with respect to the acquisition, construction or reconstruction of each qualified agreement vessel.
( 3 ) *Submission of contracts.* When a contract is executed for any acquisition, construction or reconstruction relating to the agreement, such contract shall be submitted within 30 days after execution to the Maritime Administrator who shall then determine whether such undertaking is in accordance with the program set forth in Schedule B.
( d ) *Schedule C—Depositories.* Schedule C lists, by name and address, the depositories of the fund. See § 390.7 (relating to deposits).
( e ) *Schedule D—Minimum deposits.* Schedule D sets forth the minimum deposits which must be made into the fund. See § 390.7 (relating to deposits) for the procedure in setting minimum deposits.
( f ) *Submission of proposed schedules.* An applicant shall submit proposed schedules with his application. The specific information required in such schedules is set forth in the application instructions referred to in paragraph (a)(1) of § 390.2. A sample agreement (standard part and appended schedules) is contained in appendix II to this part.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending April 29, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

ROBERT RATHMAN, 

 Petitioner, Case No. 15-cv-12150 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

JEFFREY WOODS, 

 Respondent. 

_________________________________/ 

JUDGMENT 

The above-entitled matter having come before the Court on a petition for a writ of 

habeas corpus, the Honorable Matthew F. Leitman, United States District Judge, presiding, 

and in accordance with the Opinion and Order entered on this date; 

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus 

is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

 DAVID J. WEAVER 

 CLERK OF COURT 

 By: s/Holly A. Monda 

 Deputy Clerk 

Approved: 

s/Matthew F. Leitman 

MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

United States District Judge 

Dated: May 3, 2017 

Detroit, Michigan
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pop N Go, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

|                      |                                                                                      
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:
August 19, 2006 |                                                                                      
|                      | By:
/s/ Melvin Wyman                                                                 
|                      | Name:
Melvin Wyman                                                                   
|                      | Title:
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting                       Officer
|                      |                                                                                      



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Pop N Go, Inc. and will be retained by Pop N Go, Inc. and furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.2


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT


(Incentive Stock Option)


 


This
Amendment No. 1 to Stock Option Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of January 25,
2005 by and between Electro Scientific Industries, Inc., an Oregon corporation
(the “Company”), and Nicholas
Konidaris (“Optionee”).  The Company and Optionee are parties to a
Stock Option Agreement dated as of January 25, 2004 (the “Original Agreement”).  Capitalized terms in this Amendment which are
not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Original
Agreement.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the usual promises hereinafter set forth, the
parties hereto agree as follows:


 


AGREEMENT


 


1.                                       A
new paragraph is inserted at the end of the Original Agreement to read in its
entirety as follows:


 


“The Board of Directors,
in its discretion, may accelerate the vesting of any of the shares subject to
the option (the “Accelerated Shares”), in which event the Accelerated Shares
shall be restricted upon exercise, with the restriction to lapse with respect
to 3,921 Accelerated Shares on each Full Vest date following the date of
acceleration (by way of example, if the vesting of all of Optionee’s unvested
options is accelerated effective August 1, 2005, the restriction on
3,921 of the Accelerated Shares would lapse on July 13, 2005, the
restriction on another 3,921 of the Accelerated Shares would lapse on July 13,
2006, the restriction on another 3,921 of the Accelerated Shares would
lapse on July 13, 2007 and the restriction on the remaining Accelerated
Shares would lapse on July 13, 2008); provided, further, that such
restrictions shall lapse upon any event under the Employment Agreement that
would have caused the option to become immediately exercisable prior to the
acceleration described in this section. 
For purposes of this section, the restriction on the Accelerated Shares
prohibits Optionee from selling, assigning, pledging, or in any manner
transferring such restricted Accelerated Shares, or any right or interest in
such restricted Accelerated Shares, whether voluntarily or by operation of law,
or by gift, bequest or otherwise.  Any
sale or transfer, or purported sale or transfer, of restricted Accelerated
Shares, in violation of this provision shall be null and void.”


 


2.                                       Except
as set forth in Section 1 hereof, the terms of the Original Agreement are
unchanged and remain in full force and effect.


 


(Signature pages follow)


 


1





















 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly
executed and effective as of the date first written above.


 


	
  COMPANY:

  	
  ELECTRO
  SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Jon D.
  Tompkins

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name: John D/ Tompkins

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title: Chairman

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  OPTIONEE:

  	
  /s/ Nicholas Konidaris

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Nicholas
  Konidaris

  
					



 


2
EXHIBIT
32.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report of Axonyx Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gosse B. Bruinsma,
M.D, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 1.
  the Report fully complies with the requirements of
  section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
  the information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of the Company.  /s/ Gosse B. Bruinsma, M.D.Gosse B. Bruinsma, M.D
  President and Chief Executive Officer August 8, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), H. Ravi Brar, Chief Financial Officer of Pac-West Telecomm, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



1. The Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 14th day of November, 2003.







|/s/ H. Ravi Brar
H. Ravi Brar
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense

# ACTION:

Federal Advisory Committee Sub Committee Meeting notice.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5 U.S.C., Appendix, as amended), the Sunshine in the Government Act of 1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended) and 41 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §§ 102-3.140 through 160, the  Department of Defense announces the forthcoming sub committee meeting.

Subcommittees of the Commission will conduct preparatory work meetings in the Chicago area to gather information, conduct research and analyze issues and facts in preparation for a meeting of the Commission. Pursuant to section 102-3.160(a) of 41 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), these subcommittee meetings are not open to the public, and the subcommittees are required to report their findings to the Commission for further deliberation. Locations include the DoD/VA combined Health Center at Naval Training Center Great Lakes. Additionally, the Sub Committees will visit public and private hospitals in the area for investigation of Centers of Excellence that apply to the Commission's Charter.

Dated: May 11, 2007.

L.M. Bynum, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.

[FR Doc. 07-2421  Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
§ 197.480 Logbooks. ( a ) The person-in-charge of a vessel or facility, that is required by 46 U.S.C. 11301 to have an official logbook, shall maintain the logbook on form CG-706.
( b ) The person-in-charge of a vessel or facility not required by 46 U.S.C. 11301 to have an official logbook, shall maintain, on board, a logbook for making the entries required by this subpart.
( c ) The diving supervisor conducting commercial diving operations from a vessel or facility subject to this subpart shall maintain a logbook for making the entries required by this subpart.
[CGD 76-009, 43 FR 53683, Nov. 16, 1978, as amended by CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51220, Sept. 30, 1997]
# C_2013344EN.01003402.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/34

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret — Denmark) — Ministeriet for Forskning, Innovation og Videregående Uddannelser v Manova A/S

(Case C-336/12) (1)

1

(Request for a preliminary ruling - Public procurement - Directive 2004/18/EC - Principle of equal treatment - Restricted procedure - Contract notice - Requirement for a copy of the most recent published balance sheet to be enclosed with the application - Copies of balance sheets not enclosed with some candidates’ applications - Right of the contracting authority to ask those candidates to provide copies of those balance sheets after the deadline for filing applications)

2013/C 344/59

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Referring court

Østre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ministeriet for Forskning, Innovation og Videregående Uddannelser

Applicant:

Defendant: Manova A/S

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Østre Landsret — Interpretation of Annex IIB to Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114) — Principle of equal treatment — Contracting authority which has made success at the screening stage conditional upon candidates filing copies of their most recent balance sheets — Request from that contracting authority for candidates which have not enclosed copies of their most recent balance sheets with their screening applications to provide copies of the balance sheets even though the deadline for filing the applications has passed

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The principle of equal treatment must be interpreted as not precluding a contracting authority from asking a candidate, after the deadline for applying to take part in a tendering procedure, to provide documents describing that candidate’s situation — such as a copy of its published balance sheet — which can be objectively shown to pre-date that deadline, so long as it was not expressly laid down in the contract documents that, unless such documents were provided, the application would be rejected. That request must not unduly favour or disadvantage the candidate or candidates to which it is addressed.

---

(1)  OJ C 287, 22.9.2012.

1

---
| | CERTIFICATION | EXHIBIT 31.2
| | ------------- | ------------

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

|I, Barry L. Lazarus, certify that:
|----------------------------------
|                                  
|1.                                
|                                  
|2.                                
|                                  
|3.                                
|                                  
|4.                                
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|5.                                
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  



|Date: | May 7, 2004            
|----- | -----------------------
|      |                        
|      | /s/ BARRY L. LAZARUS   
|      |                        
|      |                        
|By:   | Barry L. Lazarus       
|      | Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Ralph Schmitt, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sipex Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date:  September 20, 2006  /s/ Ralph Schmitt      Ralph Schmitt   Chief Executive Officer
#### § 3.10-5 Renewal of letter of designation.

At least 60 days prior to the expiration date of the letter of designation or certificate of inspection, a request for renewal must be submitted in the same manner as described in 3.10-1. However, if the request for renewal is submitted to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, who made the initial determination and all operating conditions remain unchanged, the information required by § 3.10-1(b) need not be resubmitted with the request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 26, 2018

No. 04-16-00786-CV

Anthony MOORE and Joann Moore,

Appellants

v.

David SUBIA,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CV04165

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

The Court has considered the Appellant’s Motion for Reconsideration En Banc and the 

motion is DENIED.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of June, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Lowther, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Lowther*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 45.]

(Nos. 98-1628 and 98-1859

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided December 2, 1998.)

*Ronald J. O’Brien,*Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Steven L. Taylor,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

*Judith M. Stevenson,*Franklin County Public Defender, and *Paul Skendelas,*Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### Nathan Pakalinsky, *Respondent, v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Order denying new trial affirmed. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.