alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7709

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BRUCE WAYNE TART,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District

Judge. (CR-00-106; CA-02-2-1)

Submitted: March 25, 2004 Decided: March 30, 2004

Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce Wayne Tart, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Hale Levin, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Bruce Wayne Tart seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting a magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. This order is not

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are

also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,

336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Tart has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Tart’s motion for a

certificate of appealability, deny his motion for leave to proceed

in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  HMC
Acquisition  Properties,  Inc. and Subsidiaries  Consolidated Balance Sheets and
Consolidated  Statements  of  Operations as of and for the year ended January 3,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>   0001007076
<NAME>  HMC Acquisition Properties, Inc.                      
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     $US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jan-03-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Dec-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jan-03-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         33,382
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  16,050
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         565,425
<DEPRECIATION>                                 36,295
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 586,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        350,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     216,166
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   586,261
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,259
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  48,574
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4,582
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             32,591
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                20,406
<INCOME-TAX>                                   8,063
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            12,343
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   12,343
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        



</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59783, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 148.20 Deadlines for submission of petition and related requests. ( a ) A petition for a special permit must be submitted at least 45 days before the requested effective date. Requests for extension or renewal of an existing special permit must be submitted 20 days before the date of expiration.
( b ) Requests for extension or renewal must include the information required under § 148.21(a), (f), and (g) of this part.
# C_2012032EN.01003701.xml

| 4.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/37

---

Action brought on 5 December 2011 — Meyr-Melnhof Karton v OHIM — Stora Enso (SILVAWHITE)

(Case T-617/11)

2012/C 32/73

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Meyr-Melnhof Karton AG (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: P. Baronikians and N. Wittich, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Stora Enso Oyj (Helsinki, Finland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 September 2011 in case R 2139/2010-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 September 2011 in case R 2139/2010-2;

| — | Reject the opposition against the Community trade mark application No 8197469; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Reject the opposition against the Community trade mark application No 8197469; and

| — | Order that the defendant pays the applicant’s costs incurred before OHIM and the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order that the defendant pays the applicant’s costs incurred before OHIM and the General Court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘SILVAWHITE’, for goods in class 16 — Community trade mark application No 8197469

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Finnish trade mark registration No 231953 of the word ‘SILVAPRESS’, for goods in class 16; International trade mark registration No 872793 of the word ‘SILVAPRESS’, for goods in class 16

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal wrongly ruled that likelihood of confusion exists between the earlier mark and the Community trade mark application.

Pleas in law:

---
U.S. Access Board: Rail Vehicles Access Advisory Committee

Subcommittee on Boarding and Alighting Meeting #4

July 24, 2014

1:00 – 3:00 Eastern

1.0 Introductions

2.0 Approval of the Agenda

3.0 Review of assigned tasks 

3.1 Discuss PRIIA specification status

3.2 Review draft of vehicle-based ramps and bridgeplates, if available

4.0 Discussion of boarding and alighting devices

4.1 Review of current law and regulations and develope recommendations

A. Lifts

B. Ramps

C. Bridge plates

5.0 Planning 

5.1 Develop action items 

5.2 Assign duties and tasks 

5.3 Establish deadlines for deliverables

6.0 Next meeting Thursday, August 28th, 1:00 – 3:00 Eastern

Attachments
Docket Files EPA- R09

- OAR

- 2016

- 0543

A. Notices 1. Proposed R ule - Determination of Attainment of the 2 008 O zone N ational Ambient A ir Quality Standards; E astern S an Luis O bispo, California , 81 FR 70 382 (October 12, 2 016)

B. FR No tices 1. 73 FR 1 6436 ( March 27, 2008 ) 2. 77 FR 3 0088 (May 2 1, 2012) 3. 80 FR 6 5292 ( October 2 6, 2015) 4. 81 FR 2 6697 ( Ma y 4, 2016)

C. Other D ocuments
1. Letter from Meredith K urpius, M anager, Air Quality A nalysis O ffice, EPA R egion I X, t o Larry A llen, Air Pollution C ontrol Officer, S LO CAPCD, d ated D ecember 1 1, 2013.

2. Letter from Meredith K urpius, M anager, Air Quality A nalysis O ffice, EPA R egion I X, t o Larry A llen, Air Pollution C ontrol Officer, S LOCAPCD, d ated October 2 7, 2014

.
3. Letters fro m Meredith K urpius, M anager, Air Q uality Analysis O ffice, E PA Region I X, t o Larry Al len, A ir Pollution C ontrol Officer, S LOCAPCD, d ated October 26 , 20 15.

4. Letter from E lizabeth J

. A dams, A cting D irector, A ir D ivision, E PA R egion I X, t o R ichard C orey, Executive O fficer, C ARB, d ated A ugust 31, 2016, t ransmitting fin dings of the E PA’s 2 015 TSA of the C ARB's a mbient air monitoring p rogram.

5. Letter from L arry A llen, A ir Pollution C ontrol Officer, S LOCAPCD, t o A lexis S trauss, A cting Regional Administrator, E PA R egion I X, r egarding 2 015 A nnual SLAMS D ata Certification, certifying c alendar year 2015 a mbient air quality d ata an d q uality as surance d ata, A pril 19, 2 016.

a. CY2015-AMP430

b. CY2005-signed-AMP600

6. San L uis O bispo C ounty A PCD’s Annual Network P lan Report (July 2 015)

.

7. Cover l etter f or S an L uis Obispo C ounty A PCD’s A nnual N etwork P lan Report ( July 2015).

8. EPA, Air Quality System, Design V alue R eport, J uly 2 5, 2016.

9. EPA A QS Qu i ck Look Report (A MP450), A ugust 10, 2 016.

10. CARB Annual Monitoring N etwork Report f or Twenty -f ive Districts in C alifornia, V olume 1 , J une 2015.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Michael W. Bruns, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DOVER SADDLERY, INC.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions) a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 14, 2007 /s/   Michael W. Bruns   Michael W. Bruns   Chief Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cameco Corporation (the Company)
on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gerald W.
Grandey, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| |     |  |                                    
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------
| | By: |  | /s/ Gerald W. Grandey              
| |     |  |                                    
| |     |  | Gerald W. Grandey                  
| |     |  | President & Chief Executive Officer

April 16, 2003
**   Effective Federal Tax             Rates:**
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Based on my knowledge, I, Douglas T. Watson, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Digital Video Systems,
Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended December 31, 2002 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K/A fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Digital Video Systems, Inc.



July 14, 2003 /s/ Douglas T. Watson                   Douglas T. Watson
   Chief Executive Officer



Based on my knowledge, I, Robert Baker, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Digital Video Systems, Inc. on Form
10-K/A for the annual period ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Digital
Video Systems, Inc.



July 14, 2003 /s/ Robert
Baker                   Robert Baker
                   Chief Financial Officer

---
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



     I, Gerald J. Ford,  Chief  Executive  Officer of Golden State Holdings Inc.
(the "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Quarterly  Report on  Form 10-Q  of the Company for the quarterly period
    ended June  30, 2002  (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13 (a)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U. S. C. 78m; and

(2) The information  contained in  the Report  fairly presents,  in all material
    respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  August 9, 2002


                                                  /s/ Gerald J. Ford
                                             ___________________________________
                                             Gerald J. Ford
                                             Chief Executive Officer
# C_2014184EN.01000202.xml

| 16.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/2

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 March 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Beroep te Gent — Belgium) — Bloomsbury NV v Belgische Staat

(Case C-510/12) (1)

1

((Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure - Fourth Directive 78/660/EEC - Article 2(3) - Principle of a true and fair view - Article 2(4) - Obligation to inform - Article 2(5) - Obligation to depart from the principle of a true and fair view - Article 32 - Valuation method based on historical cost - Acquisition by a company of an asset free of charge))

2014/C 184/03

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van Beroep te Gent

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bloomsbury NV

Applicant:

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Hof van Beroep te Gent (Belgium) — Interpretation of Article 2(3), (4) and (5) of Fourth Council Directive 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978 based on Article 54(3)(g) of the Treaty on the annual accounts of certain types of companies (OJ 1978 L 222, p. 11) — Principle of a true and fair view — Acquisition by a company of an important asset free of charge — Not possible for the company to enter the value of that acquisition in its accounts as a distorted impression would thereby be given of its assets, financial situation and results

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of Article 2 of Fourth Council Directive 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978 based on Article [44(2)(g) EC] on the annual accounts of certain types of companies must be interpreted as meaning that, where a company acquires an important asset free of charge, it is under no obligation to enter that asset in the accounts at its true value.

---

(1)  OJ C 46, 16.2.2013.

1

---
# C_2012006EN.01002603.xml

| 7.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/26

---

Action brought on 24 October 2011 — ZZ and Others v Commission

(Case F-110/11)

2012/C 6/49

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ and Others (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the pay slips of the applicants for December 2010 and their pay slips of the following months to the extent that they contain no correction of the adjustment of remunerations taking account of the correction coefficient for their place of employment.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the pay slips of the applicants for December 2010 and their pay slips of the following months: |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the pay slips of the applicants for December 2010 and their pay slips of the following months:

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cr-20780 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

CURTIS SCOTT, 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO RE-REVIEW 

COMPASSIONATE RELEASE AND TO 

REQUEST A LAWYER (ECF No. 659) 

 On March 9, 2016, a jury convicted Defendant Curtis Scott of aiding and 

abetting a carjacking, aiding and abetting the discharge of a gun in furtherance of a 

carjacking, and making false statements to a federal law enforcement officer. (See 

Verdict Form, ECF No. 92.) The Court sentenced Scott to a term of 180 months in 

custody. (See Judgment, ECF No. 585, PageID.5660.) 

 On May 25, 2021, Scott moved for compassionate release. (See Mot., ECF 

No. 653.) The Court denied that motion in a written order dated July 15, 2021. (See 

Order, ECF No. 658.) Before Scott received notice of the Court’s July 15 order, he 

filed a second motion for compassionate release and for the appointment of counsel. 

(See Mot., ECF No. 659.) For all of the reasons stated in the Court’s July 15 order, 

the Court remains persuaded that Scott is not entitled to compassionate release and 

Case 2:14-cr-20780-MFL-DRG ECF No. 660, PageID.6205 Filed 07/20/21 Page 1 of 2
2 

is not entitled to the appointment of counsel. Scott’s currently pending motion for 

compassionate release and for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 659) is therefore 

DENIED. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: July 20, 2021 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on July 20, 2021, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (810) 341-9761 

Case 2:14-cr-20780-MFL-DRG ECF No. 660, PageID.6206 Filed 07/20/21 Page 2 of 2