alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 97 (Monday, May 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2492]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel, NSDK Member Conflict SEP.
    Date: June 29, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Watergate Hotel, 2650 Virginia Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20037.
    Contact Person: Alan L. Willard, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch NINDS/NIH/DHHS, Neuroscience 
Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 
20892-9529, (301) 496-5390, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bbccd2d7d7dac9dfdafbd5d2d5dfc895d5d2d395dcd4cd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="483f212424293a2c29082621262c3b66262120662f273e">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 14, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2492 Filed 5-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32

                           JACKSONVILLE BANCORP, INC.

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                       as Enacted Pursuant to Section 906
                        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of  Jacksonville  Bancorp,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the "Report"),  the  undersigned  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as enacted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the period covered by the Report.


Date: May 5, 2006                       /s/ Gilbert J. Pomar, III
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Gilbert J. Pomar, III
                                        President & Chief Executive Officer


Date: May 5, 2006                       /s/ Valerie A. Kendall
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Valerie A. Kendall
                                        Executive Vice President
                                        and Chief Financial Officer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                                                             29.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the "Form
10-QSB") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").

         I, Tracey A. Welsh, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of the Issuer, certify that:

         (i)      the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii)     the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Issuer.

Dated: August 13, 2004

                                                    /s/ Tracey A. Welsh
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Tracey A. Welsh
                                                    Senior Vice President, Chief
                                                    Financial Officer and
                                                    Treasurer
[ EXHIBIT 10.5  -  PROMISSORY NOTE ]



                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


Antoine Jarjour


$ 72,193.23                                                      June 30, 2004

1. PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST. Perfect Healthcare Corp. (the "COMPANY"), a Nevada
Corporation, for value received, hereby promises to pay to the order of Antoine
Jarjour or holder ("PAYEE") in lawful money of the United States at the
principal office of the Company, the principal amount of Seventy Two Thousand
One Hundred Ninety Three Dollars and twenty Three cents ($ 72,193.23), together
with simple interest at 4% per annum on the date of this Note. Accrued interest
shall be payable in cash at the time the Company pays the principal amount of
this Note. This Note is due and payable on demand, which may be made at any time
after the earlier of Dec. 31, 2005.

2. NO PAYMENT IF UNLAWFUL. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no
payment hereunder shall be required at any time that such payment would be
unlawful under any applicable law.

3. ATTORNEYS' FEES. If the indebtedness represented by this Note or any part
thereof is collected in bankruptcy, receivership or other judicial proceedings
or if this Note is placed in the hands of attorneys for collection after
default, Company agrees to pay, in addition to the principal and interest
payable hereunder, reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred by Payee.

4. PREPAYMENT; TRANSFER This Note may be pre-paid by the Company at any time.
This Note may be transferred only with the written consent of the Company.

5. ACCELERATION. This Note shall become immediately due and payable if (i) the
Company commences any proceeding in bankruptcy or for dissolution, liquidation,
winding-up, or other relief under state or federal bankruptcy laws; or (ii) such
proceedings are commenced against the Company, or a receiver or trustee is
appointed for the Company or a substantial part of its property, and such
proceeding or appointment is not dismissed or discharged within 60 days after
its commencement.

6. WAIVERS. Company hereby waives presentment, demand for performance, notice of
non-performance, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonor. No delay on
the part of Payee in exercising any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver of
such right or any other right. This Note is being delivered in and shall be
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington, without regard
to the conflicts of laws provisions thereof.


                                       Perfect Healthcare Corp.
                                       Date  June 30, 2004
                                        /s/ Antoine Jarjour
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       By:  Antoine Jarjour, President / CEO
                                       Perfect Healthcare Corp.
                                       4017 Colby Ave
                                       Everett,  WA  98201
Argued and submitted March 5,

reversed and remanded March 27,

petition for review denied May 28, 1996 (323 Or 265)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Appellant, v.*STANLEY L. BARKER, *Respondent.*

(94C-20910; CA A86892)

914 P2d 11

Timothy Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Ann Kelley, Assistant Attorney General.

Todd McCann argued the cause for respondent. On the brief was Burt, Swanson, Lathen, Alexander, McCann & Smith.

*83Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

LEESON, J.

*84LEESON, J.

Defendant was charged with two counts of theft and five counts of official misconduct. ORS 164.055; ORS 162.415. The state appeals from an order that sustained defendant’s demurrer to the indictments charging him with official misconduct.1 We reverse and remand.

The indictment alleged that defendant, “being a public servant, to-wit: [A] Marion County Sheriffs Office Deputy, did then and there unlawfully and knowingly perform an act, to-wit: worked on a private job while on duty as a Sheriffs Deputy, which act constituted an unauthorized exercise of his official duties, with intent to obtain a benefit, to-wit: financial gain.”2

Defendant’s demurrer claims that the indictment fails to state facts constituting a crime. ORS 135.630(4). The essence of his argument is that the facts on which he expects the state to rely at trial are insufficient to prove the crime charged.

 In this case, the allegations of the indictment mirror the language of ORS 162.415(l)(b). That is sufficient to state an offense. *State v. Reed,*116 Or App 58, 59, 840 P2d 723 (1992). Only if an accused can admit the truth of every allegation of fact in an indictment and still be innocent of a crime, is the indictment insufficient. *State v. Anderson,*242 Or 457, 462, 410 P2d 230 (1966). Defendant’s argument about what he expects the state to present at trial is premature and does not provide a basis for sustaining a demurrer. *State v. Kurtz,*46 Or App 617, 624, 612 P2d 749, *rev den*289 Or 588 (1980). Because of this disposition, we need not address the state’s second assignment of error.

Reversed and remanded.

1

 ORS 162.415 provides in part:

> "(1) A public servant commits the crime of official misconduct in the first degree if with intent to obtain a benefit or to harm another:

> ((‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡

> “(b) The public servant knowingly performs an act constituting an unauthorized exercise in official duties.”

2

 Each of the five counts of the indictment was identical, with the exception of the dates alleged.
Case 1:00-cv-10218-DML ECF No. 19 filed 04/25/02 PageID.19 Page 1 of 1
#### Louis Schewe, *Appellant, v.*John Mulvey, *Respondent*.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.
###### Editorial Note on Part 199

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 199 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59789, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 199.260 General.

Cargo vessels and special purpose vessels, as described in § 199.10(f), must meet the requirements in this subpart in addition to the requirements in subparts A and B of this part.

[CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25313, May 20, 1996, as amended by USCG-1999-6216, 64 FR 53229, Oct. 1, 1999]
GAO-01-139R National Federation of Music Clubs

United States General Accounting Office

Washington, DC 20548

October 27, 2000

The Honorable Henry J. Hyde

Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary

House of Representatives

Subject: Federally Chartered Corporation: Review of the Financial Statement Audit

Reports for the National Federation of Music Clubs for Fiscal Years 1999

and 1998

Dear Mr. Chairman:

As requested, we reviewed the audit reports covering the financial statements of the

National Federation of Music Clubs, a federally chartered corporation, for the fiscal

years ended June 30, 1999 and 1998. The corporation’s purpose is to encourage

American musical activities. The corporation advances its objectives by granting

awards and scholarships, publishing periodicals, and sponsoring various music

related activities.

Federally chartered corporations are required under 36 U.S.C. 10101 to

• present the corporation’s assets and liabilities and reasonable detail on the

corporation’s income and expenses in annual financial statements,

• obtain an annual financial audit by an independent public accountant, and

• submit the auditors’ report and the corporation’s financial statements to the

Congress.

The objective of our review was to determine whether the audit reports complied

with the financial reporting requirements of the law. In carrying out our work, we

reviewed the corporation’s financial statements and the accompanying notes,

performed certain analytical procedures related to information presented in the

financial statements, reviewed the auditors’ reports, and made inquiries to

corporation officials or the auditors as we deemed necessary. We did not review the

auditors’ working papers. Our review disclosed no reportable instances of

noncompliance.
Page 2 GAO-01-139R National Federation of Music Clubs

The audit reports included the auditors’ opinions that the financial statements of the

corporation were presented fairly on a modified cash basis of accounting. We are

returning the audit reports you sent with your letter.

Sincerely yours,

Jeffrey C. Steinhoff

Managing Director

Financial Management and Assurance

w/o Enclosure

(912007)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i), announcement is made of the intent to grant an exclusive, royalty-bearing, revocable license within the geographic area of the United States of America and its territories and possessions to U.S. Patent number 6,181,303, issued on January 30, 2001 entitled “Flat panel three-dimensional display unit”, to Polaris Sensor Technologies, Inc. with its principal place of business at 200 West Court Square Suite 302, Huntsville, AL 35801. 

# ADDRESSES:

                        Commander, U.S. Army Research Development and Engineering Command,                         *ATTN:*                         AMSRD-AMR-AS-PT-TR, Bldg 5400, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898-5000.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For licensing issues, Ms. Cindy Wallace, Office of Research & Technology Applications, (256) 313-0895. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Two liquid crystal display panels, stacked together into a flat compact unit, in conjunction with a dedicated processor producing the appropriate video signals to drive the panels, generates a pair of polarization-encoded left and right images and exhibits them as a stereo image that is viewable through a pair of standard polarized glasses. This makes it possible to obtain stereo effect at a video workstation or at a console by eliminating the bulky box-like setup or the need to project onto a screen. 

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 07-2264 Filed 5-7-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE  3710-08-M
§ 171.110 Specific applicability. ( a ) Sections 171.111, 171.112, and 171.113 apply to each vessel of 100 gross tons or more.
( b ) Section 171.114 applies to each vessel under 100 gross tons.
[CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51017, Nov. 4, 1983, as amended by CGD 85-080, 61 FR 945, Jan. 10, 1996; 62 FR 51353, Sept. 30, 1997]
§ 30.30-3 Evaluation materials. The materials to be submitted for evaluation must include the English text of the following: ( a ) All laws, decrees, orders, and regulations relating to manning, training, qualification, and watchkeeping of personnel on tank vessels engaged in foreign trade.
( b ) A copy of each type of license and certificate issued by the country to tank vessel personnel.
# C_2013026EN.01004702.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/47

---

Order of the General Court of 26 November 2012 — MIP Metro v OHIM — Real Seguros (real,- QUALITY)

(Case T-548/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Revocation of earlier national trade marks - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 26/93

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Real Seguros, SA (Porto, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 August 2011 (Case R 114/2011-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Real Seguros, SA and MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

| 2. | The parties shall bear their own costs incurred before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The parties shall bear their own costs incurred before the General Court.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 7.1.2012.

1

---
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 


REGION 10 


1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 

Seattle, WA 98101-3140 

OFFICE OF 


ECOSYSTEMS, TRIBAL AND 


PUBLIC AFFAIRS 


CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 

Paul Henson, State Supervisor 

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 

Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office' 

2600 S.E. 98th Ave, Ste 100 

Portland, OR 97266 

Re: 	 Request for Concurrence from USFWS on EPA Determination that Site Designation of 

the Siuslaw River Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Sites is ''Not Likely to Adversely 

Affect" Listed Threatened or Endangered Species 

Dear Mr. Henson: 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 10, has had an opportunity to 

examine whether its proposed action to designate two ocean dredged material disposal sites 

pursuant to Section 102(c) ofthe Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act, as amended 

(MPRSA), 33 U.S.C. §§ 1401 to 1445, near the mouth ofthe Siuslaw River offthe coast of 

Oregon will impact species listed as endangered or threatened pursuant to the Endangered 

Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531 to 1544. Based on the ;;tttached 

Biological Assessment, EPA, Region 10, has determined that the proposed action to designate 

the Siuslaw Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Sites will not likely adversely affect designated 

species under USFWS jurisdiction occurring in the area or adversely impact designated critical 

habitat for those species. For a complete species list, please refer to Table 1 ofthe attached 

Biological Assessment. EPA, Region 10, requests your written concurrence that its proposed 

action to designate the Siuslaw Ocean Dredged Material Disposal sites is not likely to adversely 

affect listed threatened or endangered species under USFWS jurisdiction. EPA, Region 10, is 

also enclosing a draft ofthe Site Management and Monitoring Plan (SMMP) for your 

infonnation. 

We are available for discussion ofthe topics and issues raised in this letter. If you should 

have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Jessica Winkler ofmy staff at (206) 553-7369. 

Sincerely, ;;WA/J4 {;r 

Richard B. Parkin, Acting Director 

Office of Ecosystems, Tribal and Public Affairs 

Enclosures
**Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 July 2011 – Gbagbo v Council**

**(Case T-348/11)**

Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire – Action for annulment – Time-limit for bringing an action – Out of time – Clear inadmissibility

1.                     *Actions for annulment – Time-limits – Matter of public policy – Examination by the EU judicature of its own motion (Art. 263,
sixth para., TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 102(1) and (2)) (see paras 11-12)*

2.                     *Actions for annulment – Time-limits – Starting point – Publication date of the measure in question (Arts 263, fourth and sixth
paras, TFEU and 275, second para., TFEU; Council Regulation No 560/2005; Council Decision 2010/656) (see para. 16)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for annulment, first, of Council Decision 2011/221/CFSP of 6 April 2011 amending Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 93, p. 20), and, secondly, of Council Regulation (EU) No 330/2011 of 6 April 2011 amending Regulation No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 93, p. 10), in so far as they concern the applicant. |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The action is dismissed. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Mr Laurent Gbagbo is ordered to bear his own costs. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for accelerated procedure and priority judgment. |