alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2:14-cr-20556-VAR-MKM Doc # 12 Filed 11/05/14 Pg 1 of 16 Pg ID 39
2:14-cr-20556-VAR-MKM Doc # 12 Filed 11/05/14 Pg 2 of 16 Pg ID 40
2:14-cr-20556-VAR-MKM Doc # 12 Filed 11/05/14 Pg 3 of 16 Pg ID 41
2:14-cr-20556-VAR-MKM Doc # 12 Filed 11/05/14 Pg 4 of 16 Pg ID 42
2:14-cr-20556-VAR-MKM Doc # 12 Filed 11/05/14 Pg 5 of 16 Pg ID 43
2:14-cr-20556-VAR-MKM Doc # 12 Filed 11/05/14 Pg 6 of 16 Pg ID 44
2:14-cr-20556-VAR-MKM Doc # 12 Filed 11/05/14 Pg 7 of 16 Pg ID 45
2:14-cr-20556-VAR-MKM Doc # 12 Filed 11/05/14 Pg 8 of 16 Pg ID 46
2:14-cr-20556-VAR-MKM Doc # 12 Filed 11/05/14 Pg 9 of 16 Pg ID 47
2:14-cr-20556-VAR-MKM Doc # 12 Filed 11/05/14 Pg 10 of 16 Pg ID 48
2:14-cr-20556-VAR-MKM Doc # 12 Filed 11/05/14 Pg 11 of 16 Pg ID 49
2:14-cr-20556-VAR-MKM Doc # 12 Filed 11/05/14 Pg 12 of 16 Pg ID 50
2:14-cr-20556-VAR-MKM Doc # 12 Filed 11/05/14 Pg 13 of 16 Pg ID 51
2:14-cr-20556-VAR-MKM Doc # 12 Filed 11/05/14 Pg 14 of 16 Pg ID 52
2:14-cr-20556-VAR-MKM Doc # 12 Filed 11/05/14 Pg 15 of 16 Pg ID 53
2:14-cr-20556-VAR-MKM Doc # 12 Filed 11/05/14 Pg 16 of 16 Pg ID 54
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                         Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350

         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Astrata Group  Incorporated
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Trevor Venter,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, to the best
of my knowledge,  pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      i.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      ii.   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  required by Section 906, has been  provided to Astrata Group
Incorporated and will be retained by Astrata Group Incorporated and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated:  October 17, 2005

                                                 /S/ TREVOR VENTER
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Name:  Trevor Venter
                                                 Title:  Chief Executive Officer
#### § 308.410 Reporting casualties and filing claims.

Casualties shall be reported promptly to, and all claims documents filed with MARAD, Attention: Chief, Division of Marine Insurance, at the address in § 308.2(d).
#### § 308.409 Standard form of War Risk Builder's Risk Insurance Policy, Form MA-283.

The standard form of War Risk Builder's Risk Insurance Policy, Form MA-283 may be obtained from MARAD's underwriting agent or MARAD.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Neil Emery and Ryan Burgdorf,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 15-11113

Joseph R. Burtch, D.O., Sean F. Cox

United States District Court Judge

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER 

ADOPTING 9/22/17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Acting through Counsel, Plaintiffs Neil Emery and Ryan Burgdorf (“Plaintiffs”) filed this

§ 1983 civil rights action against Defendant Joseph R. Burtch, D.O., alleging that Defendant

Burtch sexually assaulted them while providing medical care to them while they were

incarcerated, in violation of the Eight Amendment. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge

David Grand for all pretrial matters.

On March 17, 2017, Defendant Burtch filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. After full

briefing by the parties and oral argument, on September 22, 2017, Magistrate Judge Grand

issued a fourteen page Report and Recommendation (“the R&R”) wherein he explained the

standard of review that applies to the motion, set forth the governing legal standards, and then

evaluated Defendant’s arguments. Magistrate Judge Grand concluded that, viewing the evidence

in favor of Plaintiffs, the non-moving party, that: 1) Plaintiffs have established a genuine issue of

material fact as to whether the objective prong of the analysis is met, including proof that the

alleged conduct actually occurred and proof of injury; and 2) Plaintiffs have established a

1
genuine issue of material fact as to whether the subjective prong of the analysis has been met.

Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), a party objecting to the recommended disposition of a

matter by a Magistrate Judge must filed objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after

being served with a copy of the R&R.

On October 2, 2017, Defendant Burtch filed timely Objections the R&R. On October 14,

2017, Plaintiffs filed a Response to the Objections, and on October 20, 2017, Defendant filed a

reply brief.

Having carefully review the magistrate judge’s R&R, and having considered Defendant

Burtch’s objections to it, the Court concludes that the magistrate judge applied the correct legal

standard and concurs with both his analysis and conclusions. 

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the magistrate judge’s September 22, 2017 R&R. IT

IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Burtch’s Motion for Summary Judgment is

DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Sean F. Cox 

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge

Dated: January 25, 2018

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on

January 25, 2018, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Jennifer McCoy 

Case Manager

2
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                                  LYCOS, INC.
        COMPUTATION OF SHARES USED IN COMPUTING NET LOSS PER SHARE (1)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                          THREE MONTHS    YEAR         YEAR
                             ENDED        ENDED        ENDED        INCEPTION
                            JULY 31,    JULY 31,     JULY 31,     (JUNE 1, 1995)
                              1997        1997         1996      TO JULY 31, 1995
                          ------------ -----------  -----------  ----------------
<S>                       <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Common stock, beginning
 of period..............   13,796,620   13,792,896   10,000,000     10,000,000
Cheap stock shares
 relating to SAB No. 83
 (2)....................          --           --     1,086,956      1,086,956
Weighted average common
 shares
 issued during the
 period.................          --         1,847      979,651            --
Treasury stock buyback..          --           --       (74,192)       (74,192)
                           ----------  -----------  -----------     ----------
Weighted average common
 shares
 outstanding during the    13,796,620   13,794,743   11,992,415     11,012,764
 period.................   ==========  ===========  ===========     ==========
Net loss................   $ (575,352) $(6,619,190) $(5,087,838)    $ (105,381)
                           ==========  ===========  ===========     ==========
Primary net loss per       $    (0.04) $     (0.48) $     (0.42)    $    (0.01)
 share..................   ==========  ===========  ===========     ==========
</TABLE>
--------
(1) Fully diluted net loss per share has not been separately presented, as the
    amounts would not be materially different from primary net loss per share.
(2) Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin
    No. 83, certain common and common equivalent shares issued by the Company
    during the twelve months immediately preceding the initial filing of the
    registration statement relating to the Company's initial public offering
    at less than the additional public offering price have been included in
    the calculation of weighted average shares, using the treasury stock
    method and the initial public offering price, as if these shares were
    outstanding for all periods prior to the initial public offering.
Exhibit 99.1

                                 CARESIDE, INC.
                             a Delaware corporation

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                            Section 906 Certification


                                       22
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 99.1

                                 CARESIDE, INC.
                             a Delaware corporation

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                            Section 906 Certification

      I, W. Vickery Stoughton, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Careside, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do hereby
certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) the Quarterly Report on From 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly
      period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Date: November 18, 2002                            By: /s/ W. Vickery Stoughton
                                                       ------------------------
                                                       W. Vickery Stoughton
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                                       Chief Financial Officer


                                       23
#### § 172.010 Applicability.

This subpart applies to each vessel that loads grain in bulk, except vessels engaged solely on voyages on rivers, lakes, bays, and sounds or on voyages between Great Lake ports and St. Lawrence River ports as far east as a straight line drawn from Cape de Rosiers to West Point, Anticosti Island and as far east of a line drawn along the 63rd meridian from Anticosti Island to the north shore of the St. Lawrence River.
§ 176.120 Certificate of Inspection amendment. ( a ) An amended Certificate of Inspection may be issued at any time by any OCMI. The amended Certificate of Inspection replaces the original, but the expiration date remains the same as that of the original. An amended Certificate of Inspection may be issued to authorize and record a change in the dimensions, gross tonnage, owner, managing operator, manning, persons permitted, route permitted, conditions of operations, or equipment of a vessel, from that specified in the current Certificate of Inspection.
( b ) A request for an amended Certificate of Inspection must be made to the cognizant OCMI by the owner or managing operator of the vessel at any time there is a change in the character of a vessel or in its route, equipment, ownership, operation, or similar factors specified in its current Certificate of Inspection.
( c ) The OCMI may require an inspection prior to the issuance of an amended Certificate of Inspection.
# C_2013225EN.01002602.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/26

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 May 2013 — Quinn Barlo Ltd, Quinn Plastics NV, Quinn Plastics GmbH v European Commission

(Case C-70/12 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for methacrylates - Duration of the infringement - Presumption of innocence - Statement of reasons - Unlimited jurisdiction - General principles of the protection of legitimate expectations and equal treatment - Proportionality of the fine)

2013/C 225/42

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Quinn Barlo Ltd, Quinn Plastics NV, Quinn Plastics GmbH (represented by: F. Wijckmans and M. Visser, advocaten)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: N. Khan and V. Bottka, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 30 November 2011 in Case T-208/06 Quinn Barlo and Others v Commission annulling in part Decision C(2006) 2098 final of the Commission of 31 May 2006 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/38.645 — Methacrylates), which concerned a complex of anti-competitive agreements and concerted practices in the methacrylates industry consisting in agreeing, implementing and monitoring price agreements, exchanging information and participating in discussions to facilitate the infringement

Quinn Barlo and Others

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Quinn Barlo Ltd, Quinn Plastics NV and Quinn Plastics GmbH to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Quinn Barlo Ltd, Quinn Plastics NV and Quinn Plastics GmbH to pay the costs of these proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 9.6.2012.

1

---
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2436 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the charitable 

contributions deduction for food inventory, book inventory, and computer 

technology and equipment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2009 

Ms. KOSMAS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the charitable contributions deduction for food inventory, 

book inventory, and computer technology and equipment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Charitable Goods Do5 nation Act’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2436 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS DE2 DUCTION FOR FOOD INVENTORY, BOOK IN3 VENTORY, AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY 

4 AND EQUIPMENT. 

5 (a) CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOOD INVENTORY.—Clause 

6 (iv) of section 170(e)(3)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code 

7 of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2009’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘December 31, 2010’’. 

9 (b) CONTRIBUTIONS OF BOOK INVENTORY TO PUB10 LIC SCHOOLS.—Clause (iv) of section 170(e)(3)(D) of 

11 such Code is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2009’’ 

12 and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2010’’. 

13 (c) CONTRIBUTIONS OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY

14 AND EQUIPMENT FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES.—Sub15 paragraph (G) of section 170(e)(6) of such Code is amend16 ed by striking ‘‘December 31, 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘De17 cember 31, 2010’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ONEPOINT COMMUNICATIONS CORP'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM
10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             600
<SECURITIES>                                       774
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,061
<ALLOWANCES>                                       861
<INVENTORY>                                        111
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,185
<PP&E>                                          36,234
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,552
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,142
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,858
<BONDS>                                        102,415
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           35,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,142
<SALES>                                         20,986
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,986
<CGS>                                           19,849
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,849
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,405
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   861
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,956
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (42,575)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (42,575)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,860)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (22.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (22.64)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001006591
<NAME> WHITE PINE SOFTWARE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      23,298,274
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,715,957
<ALLOWANCES>                                   163,247
<INVENTORY>                                    113,130
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               450,085
<PP&E>                                       2,965,552
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,901,948
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,404,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,843,855
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,307
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,404,283
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,665,729
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,211,694
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,244,064
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                46,798
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,559,481)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    77,177
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,636,658)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.55)
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


    Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of ComBanc, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Jason R. Thornell, AVP/Controller of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

                         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                             section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                             Act of 1934, as amended; and

                         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
                             presents, in all material respects, the financial
                             condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Jason R. Thornell
---------------------
Jason R. Thornell, AVP/Controller

May 1, 2003




























                                       18
# C_2014315EN.01000601.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 July 2014 — European Commission v Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI), Hellenic Republic, Energeiaki Thessalonikis AE, Elliniki Energeia kai Anaptyxi AE (H.E. & D.S.A.)

(Case C-553/12 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Competition - Articles 82 EC and 86(1) EC - Maintenance of preferential rights granted by the Hellenic Republic in favour of a public undertaking for the exploration and exploitation of lignite deposits - Exercise of those rights - Competitive advantage on the markets for the supply of lignite and wholesale electricity - Maintenance, extension or strengthening of a dominant position))

2014/C 315/08

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: T. Christoforou and A. Antoniadis, acting as Agents, assisted by A. Oikonomou, dikigoros)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) (represented by: P. Anestis, dikigoros), Hellenic Republic (represented by M.-T. Marinos, P. Mylonopoulos and K. Boskovits, acting as Agents), Energeiaki Thessalonikis AE, Elliniki Energeia kai Anaptyxi AE (H.E. & D.S.A.)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Interveners in support of the applicants: Mytilinaios AE, Protergia AE, Alouminion AE (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, I. Zarzoura, D. Diakopoulos and E. Chrisafis, dikigoroi)

Interveners in support of the applicants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in DEI v Commission, T-169/08, EU:T:2012:448. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in DEI v Commission, T-169/08, EU:T:2012:448.

| 2. | Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union for adjudication on the pleas raised before it on which the Court of Justice of the European Union has not ruled. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union for adjudication on the pleas raised before it on which the Court of Justice of the European Union has not ruled.

| 3. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 2.2.2013.

1

---
Submitted on record and briefs October 4,

affirmed December 13, 1995,

petition for review denied April 30,1996 (323 Or 153)

#### DAVID RAYMOND DURHAM, *Appellant, v.*CARL ZENON, Superintendent, Oregon State Correctional Institution, *Respondent*

(93C-10278; CA A83724)

907 P2d 1137

David W. Knofler filed the briefs for appellant.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. *Martin v. Baldwin,*138 Or App 296, 906 P2d 868 (1995).