alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
GAO-01-170R Reserve Officers Association of the United States

United States General Accounting Office

Washington, DC 20548

October 27, 2000

The Honorable Henry J. Hyde

Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary

House of Representatives

Subject: Federally Chartered Corporation: Review of the Financial Statement Audit

Report for the Reserve Officers Association of the United States for Fiscal

Year 1999

Dear Mr. Chairman:

As requested, we reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of the

Reserve Officers Association of the United States, a federally chartered corporation,

for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999. The corporation’s purpose is to support a

military policy for the United States that will provide adequate national security.

Federally chartered corporations are required under 36 U.S.C. 10101 to

• present the corporation’s assets and liabilities and reasonable detail on the

corporation’s income and expenses in annual financial statements,

• obtain an annual financial audit by an independent public accountant, and

• submit the auditors’ report and the corporation’s financial statements to the

Congress.

The objective of our review was to determine whether the audit report complied with

the financial reporting requirements of the law. In carrying out our work, we

reviewed the corporation’s financial statements and the accompanying notes,

performed certain analytical procedures related to information presented in the

financial statements, reviewed the auditors’ report, and made inquiries to corporation

officials or the auditors as we deemed necessary. We did not review the auditors’

working papers. Our review disclosed no reportable instances of noncompliance.
Page 2 GAO-01-170R Reserve Officers Association of the United States

The audit report included the auditors’ opinion that the financial statements of the

corporation were presented fairly in accordance with generally accepted accounting

principles. We are returning the audit report you sent with your letter.

Sincerely yours,

Jeffrey C. Steinhoff

Managing Director

Financial Management and Assurance

Enclosure

(912015)
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 93 (Tuesday, May 15, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2376]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Availability of Written Reevaluation and Record of 
Decision; Centerfield Taxiway; Logan International Airport; Boston, MA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announces 
availability of a Written Reevaluation and Record of Decision (ROD) for 
a Centerfield Taxiway at Logan International Airport, Boston, 
Massachusetts. The ROD follows the issuance of a Final Environmental 
Impact Statement for the Airside Improvement Planning Project, issued 
in June 2002, and subsequent Record of Decision (August 2002) that 
approved several airport development projects but deferred a decision 
on the Centerfield Taxiway. The FAA is now documenting its decision to 
approve the Centerfield Taxiway and take action toward making federal 
funds available for its construction. FAA's Record of Decision may be 
accessed on FAA's public Web site: www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic.

DATES: Effective Date: The effective date of the FAA's Record of 
Decision on the Centerfield Taxiway at Logan International Airport is 
April 20, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information contact 
John C. Silva, Federal Aviation Administration, New England Region, 
Airports Division, ANE-610, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, 
Massachusetts 01803. Telephone 781-238-7602.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts on May 3, 2007.
Michel Hovan,
Acting Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 07-2376 Filed 5-14-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Exhibit 99.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NetSolve, Incorporated (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth C.
Kieley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the final condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/    Kenneth C. KieleyName:

Kenneth C. KieleyTitle:

Chief Financial Officer





November 14, 2002
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2474 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that in the case of 

an individual entitled to educational assistance under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance program who is enrolled at an institution of higher 

education in a State in which the public institutions charge only fees 

in lieu of tuition, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall allow the 

individual to use all or any portion of the amounts payable for the 

established charges for the program of education to pay any amount 

of the individual’s tuition or fees for that program of education. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2009 

Mr. MCKEON (for himself, Mr. DREIER, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. 

LEWIS of California, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. HERGER, Mr. ROHRABACHER, 

Mr. CALVERT, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN

of California, Mrs. BONO MACK, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. 

BILBRAY, Mr. ISSA, Mr. NUNES, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. MCCARTHY of California, and Mr. THOMPSON of California) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that 

in the case of an individual entitled to educational assistance under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance program who is enrolled at an institution of higher education in a State in which the public institutions charge 

only fees in lieu of tuition, the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs shall allow the individual to use all or any portion 

of the amounts payable for the established charges for 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2474 IH

the program of education to pay any amount of the 

individual’s tuition or fees for that program of education. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Educational 

5 Equity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. USE OF ENTITLEMENT UNDER POST-9/11 EDU7 CATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM TO PAY 

8 ANY AMOUNT OF TUITION AND FEES. 

9 Subsection (a) of section 3313 of title 38, United 

10 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol11 lowing new sentence: ‘‘In the case of such an individual 

12 who is pursuing such a program of education at an institu13 tion of higher education in a State in which the public 

14 institutions charge only fees in lieu of tuition, the Sec15 retary shall allow the individual to use all or any portion 

16 of the amounts payable under subsection (c)(1)(A) to pay 

17 any amount of the individual’s tuition or fees for that pro18 gram of education.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 27, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00188

- CR

Pablo ALFARO

- JIMENEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR9248

The Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Debra Doolittle’s notification of late record is hereby granted. The reporter’s record is

due July 20, 2016. Further requests for extension will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of June, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### § 28.10 Authority.

The regulations in this part are prescribed by the Commandant of the Coast Guard, pursuant to a delegation of authority by the Secretary of Homeland Security set forth in Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, to carry out the intent and purpose of 46 U.S.C. 3316 which authorizes the Secretary to rely on reports, documents, and certificates issued by the American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) or a similar United States classification society, or an agent of the ABS or similar society; sections 4502 and 4506 which require safety equipment and operational stability for certain vessels in the commercial fishing industry; section 6104 which requires the Secretary of Transportation to compile statistics concerning marine casualties compiled from vessel insurers and to delegate that authority to compile statistics from insurers to a qualified person; and section 10603 which requires seamen on commercial fishing industry vessels to give notice of illness, injury, or disability to their employer.

[CGD 88-079, 56 FR 40393, Aug. 14, 1991, as amended by USCG-2010-0759, 75 FR 60002, Sept. 29, 2010]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 

Deborah S. Hunt 

Clerk

100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 

POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE 

CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 

Tel. (513) 564-7000 

www.ca6.uscourts.gov

 Filed: November 14, 2017 

Ms. Megan K. Cavanagh 

Garan Lucow Miller 

1155 Brewery Park Boulevard 

Suite 200 

Detroit, MI 48207 

Mr. John J. Gillooly 

Garan Lucow Miller 

1155 Brewery Park Boulevard 

Suite 200 

Detroit, MI 48207 

Mr. Ben M. Gonek 

Law Offices 

615 Griswold Street 

Suite 1116 

Detroit, MI 48226 

Mr. Joel Barnett Sklar 

Law Offices 

615 Griswold Street 

Suite 1116 

Detroit, MI 48226 

 Re: Case No. 17-1984, Jennifer Pellow v. Kevin Barnhill, et al

Originating Case No. : 4:15-cv-11765 

Dear Sir or Madam, 

 The Court issued the enclosed (Order/Opinion) today in this case. 

 Sincerely yours, 

 

 s/Connie A. Weiskittel 

Mediation Administrator 

cc: Mr. David J. Weaver 

Enclosure 

No mandate to issue 

Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW ECF No. 52, PageID.599 Filed 11/14/17 Page 1 of 2 Case: 17-1984 Document: 19-1 Filed: 11/14/2017 Page: 1 (1 of 2)
Case No. 17-1984 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

ORDER

 

JENNIFER PELLOW, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Nathan Wesley Pellow 

 Plaintiff - Appellee 

v. 

KEVIN BARNHILL; SHANE MCKIBBEN; ROBERT ROY; JOHN ADAMS; DALE VAN 

HORN, Jointly and Severally, 

 Defendants - Appellants 

 

 In accordance with Rule 33, Rules of the Sixth Circuit, and upon consideration of the 

parties' stipulation to dismiss, 

 It is ORDERED that the case is dismissed pursuant to 42(b), Federal Rules 

of Appellate Procedure. 

 

ENTERED PURSUANT TO RULE 33, 

RULES OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk 

Issued: November 14, 2017 

___________________________________ 

Case 4:15-cv-11765-TGB-RSW ECF No. 52, PageID.600 Filed 11/14/17 Page 2 of 2 Case: 17-1984 Document: 19-2 Filed: 11/14/2017 Page: 1 (2 of 2)
----

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    | the                Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended                December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements                of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934                (15                U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| (2)    | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company.                                                                                                                                            |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |

| Dated:                February 8, 2007 | /s/                Patrick J. Goodman                            |
|---------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                        | Patrick                J. Goodman                                |
|                                        | Senior                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                        | (chief                financial officer)                         |
Submitted on record and briefs October 4,

affirmed December 13, 1995,

petition for review denied April 9, 1996 (323 Or 136)

#### SHELDON WILBERT MARTIN, *Appellant, v.*G. H. BALDWIN, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, *Respondent.*

(CV 93-0758; CA A85796)

906 P2d 868

Michael E. Rose filed the brief for appellant.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and David B. Thompson, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*297PER CURIAM

Petitioner argues that he is entitled to post-conviction relief because he was indicted by a grand jury that was constitutionally inadequate, in that the grand jury was reduced in size to fewer than seven members without notice to him. Even assuming that the indictment was constitutionally defective, that defect, if any, does not constitute a basis for post-conviction relief. *Goodwin v. State of Oregon,*125 Or App 359, 363, 866 P2d 466 (1993), *rev den*319 Or 80 (1994).

Affirmed.
# C_2013156EN.01001502.xml

| 1.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Napoli — Italy) — Oreste Della Rocca v Poste Italiane SpA

(Case C-290/12) (1)

1

(Social policy - Directive 1999/70/EC - Framework Agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP - Clause 2 - Scope of application of the Framework Agreement - Temporary employment business - Supply of temporary workers to a user undertaking - Successive fixed-term employment contracts)

2013/C 156/24

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Napoli

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Oreste Della Rocca

Applicant:

Defendant: Poste Italiane SpA

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale di Napoli — Interpretation of Clauses 2 and 5 of the Framework Agreement set out in the Annex to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP (OJ 1999 L 175, p. 43) — Scope — Applicability of that directive to temporary employment agencies — Possibility for those agencies to draw up successive fixed-term contracts with temporary workers owing to circumstances justifying the temporary nature of the employment relationship between the temporary worker and the undertaking making use of that worker

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, and the Framework Agreement on fixed-term work, concluded on 18 March 1999, set out in the Annex to that directive, must be interpreted as not applying either to the fixed-term employment relationship between a temporary worker and a temporary employment business or to the employment relationship between such a worker and a user undertaking.

---

(1)  OJ C 243, 11.8.2012.

1

---
#### Almerin Dunham, *Appellant, v.*The Trustees of the Village of Canandaigua, *Respondent*.

Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by

Hardin, J.
#### § 201.20 Attorneys at law.

Attorneys at law who are admitted to practice before the Federal courts or before the courts of any State or territory of the United States may practice before the Administration. An attorney's own representation that he is such in good standing before any of the courts herein referred to will be sufficient proof thereof.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

**We have issued our reports dated March 14, 2008accompanying the consolidated financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of i2 Technologies, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-03703, 333-27009, 333-28147, 333-53667, 333-85791, 333-36478, 333-40038, 333-43838, 333-67868,333-85884, 333-109314, 333-115143 and 333-132473), on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-132663, 333-96341, 333-31342, 333-127722 333-59106 and 333-49180), on Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement Nos. 333-132663, 333-96341, 333-31342, 333-127722 and333-59106, and on Amendments No. 2 and No. 3 to Registration Statement No. 333-59106.**

**/s/  Grant Thornton LLP**

**Dallas, Texas**

**March 14, 2008**
# C_2008014EN.01003401.xml

| 19.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/34

---

Notice concerning a request in accordance with Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council

Request made by a Member State

(2008/C 14/11)

On 10 January 2008, the Commission received a request in accordance with Article 30(4) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (1). The first working day following receipt of the request is 11 January 2008.

1

This request, made by the Republic of Austria, concerns electricity production in that country. Article 30 provides that Directive 2004/17/EC is not applicable when the relevant activity is directly exposed to competition in markets to which access is not restricted. These conditions are evaluated solely for the purposes of Directive 2004/17/EC and are without prejudice to the application of competition rules.

The Commission is allowed a period of three months to take a decision on this request, commencing on the working day referred to above. The period therefore expires on 11 April 2008.

The provisions of the third subparagraph of the abovementioned paragraph 4 are not applicable. Consequently, the period allowed to the Commission may be extended by three months. Any such extension must be published.

---

(1)  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

---
§ 169.841 Logbook entries. ( a ) Each vessel subject to the inspection provisions of this subchapter must have an official logbook.
( b ) The master shall place all entries required by law or regulation in the logbook.
( c ) A Coast Guard form “Official Logbook” may be utilized or the owner may utilize his own format for an official logbook. The logs must be kept available for review by the Coast Guard for a period of one year after the date to which the records refer or for the period of validity of the vessel's current certificate of inspection, whichever is longer.
( d ) All tests, drills, inspections and notifications required in this subchapter must be entered in the official logbook.
( e ) Prior to getting underway the master shall enter in the logbook the name of each sailing school student, sailing school instructor, and guest onboard, and the fact that each person was notified of the applicable safety standards for sailing school vessels as required by § 169.857 of this chapter.