alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

STATE FARM MUTUAL 

AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

 Case No. 2:15-cv-10993 

Plaintiff, District Judge Victoria A. Roberts 

vs. Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti 

 

UNIVERSAL REHAB SERVICES, INC., 

PHYSIOFLEX, P.L.L.C., 

SUMMIT MEDICAL GROUP, P.L.L.C., 

DAVID JANKOWSKI, D.O., and 

AHMAD T. ABULABON, P.T., 

Defendants. 

________________________________/ 

INTERIM ORDER REGARDING UNIVERSAL DEFENDANTS’ 

EMERGENCY MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR EXPERT 

DISCLOSURES (DE 175)

 On February 20, 2017, the Universal Defendants filed an emergency motion 

for extension of time for expert disclosures. (DE 175.) During the February 22, 

2017 hearing on other matters, this Court inquired whether the motion for extension 

was going to be opposed. While counsel for the Universal Defendants stated he had 

received concurrence from the Summit Defendants, Plaintiff expressed concern 

about whether an effective stay would result should the Court grant the pending 

motion to withdraw and should there be a delay in the Universal Defendants 

securing new counsel. (See DE 175 ¶ 3, DE 171.) 

2:15-cv-10993-VAR-APP Doc # 180 Filed 02/23/17 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 6910
2 

It seeming that the parties can reach an agreement on the motion, I set the 

following briefing schedule: 

 By 5 p.m. on February 23, 2017, all parties are to confer to discuss a 

stipulation and order resolving the motion for extension (DE 175). 

 If the parties reach a resolution, they shall inform my case manager and 

present a proposed stipulated order forthwith. 

 If the parties do not reach a resolution, Plaintiff shall have until 5 p.m. on 

February 24, 2017 to file a response, and the Universal Defendants shall 

have until 12 p.m. on February 27, 2017 to file a reply brief. Then, the 

Court will entertain oral argument on this motion at the previously scheduled 

hearing set for February 27, 2017 at 2 p.m. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 23, 2017 s/Anthony P. Patti 

Anthony P. Patti 

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record 

on February 23, 2017, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail. 

 s/Michael Williams 

 Case manager to the 

 Honorable Anthony P. Patti 

2:15-cv-10993-VAR-APP Doc # 180 Filed 02/23/17 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 6911
# C_2012098EN.01001601.xml

| 31.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/16

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te Leeuwarden (Netherlands), lodged on 18 January 2012 — fiscale eenheid PPG Holdings BV c.s. v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Noord/kantoor Groningen

(Case C-26/12)

2012/C 98/24

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Gerechtshof te Leeuwarden (Netherlands)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: fiscale eenheid PPG Holdings BV c.s.

Appellant:

Respondent: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Noord/kantoor Groningen

Respondent:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Can a taxable person who, pursuant to national pensions legislation, has established a separate pension fund for the purpose of safeguarding the pension rights of his employees and former employees, as participants in the fund, deduct the tax which he [has paid] on the basis of services supplied to him in respect of the implementation of the pension provision and the operation of the pension fund, pursuant to Article 17 of Directive 77/388/EEC (1) (Articles 168 and 169 of Directive 2006/112/EC (2))? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can a taxable person who, pursuant to national pensions legislation, has established a separate pension fund for the purpose of safeguarding the pension rights of his employees and former employees, as participants in the fund, deduct the tax which he [has paid] on the basis of services supplied to him in respect of the implementation of the pension provision and the operation of the pension fund, pursuant to Article 17 of Directive 77/388/EEC (1) (Articles 168 and 169 of Directive 2006/112/EC (2))?

1

2

| 2. | Can a pension fund, established with the objective of providing a pension for the participants in the pension fund at the lowest possible cost, where assets are brought to and invested in the pension fund by or on behalf of the participants, and where the resulting proceeds are shared, be classified as a ‘special investment fund’ within the terms of Article 13B[(d)].6 of Directive 77/388/EEC (Article 135(1)(g) of Directive 2006/112/EC)? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Can a pension fund, established with the objective of providing a pension for the participants in the pension fund at the lowest possible cost, where assets are brought to and invested in the pension fund by or on behalf of the participants, and where the resulting proceeds are shared, be classified as a ‘special investment fund’ within the terms of Article 13B[(d)].6 of Directive 77/388/EEC (Article 135(1)(g) of Directive 2006/112/EC)?

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1).

1

(2)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

2

---
#### § 201.162 Replies to exceptions.

Any party may file and serve a reply to exceptions within twenty (20) days after date of service thereof, unless a shorter period is fixed pursuant to § 201.54. Such reply shall indicate pages of the transcript and exhibit numbers when referring to the record.
#### § 31.05-15 Certificate of inspection; terms; endorsements—TB/ALL.

The terms, endorsements and conditions set forth on a certificate of inspection shall have the same force and effect as the regulations contained in this subchapter.
§ 28.501 Substantial alterations. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, a vessel that is substantially altered, including the cumulative effects of all alterations, need not comply with the remainder of this subpart, provided that it has stability instructions developed by a qualified individual which comply with § 28.530 (c) through (e).
( b ) A vessel that is substantially altered in a manner which adversely affects its stability, including the cumulative effects of all alterations, need not comply with the remainder of this subpart, provided the stability instructions required by paragraph (a) of this section are based on loading conditions or operating restrictions, or both, which compensate for the adverse affects of the alterations.
( c ) The following changes to a vessel's lightweight characteristics are considered to adversely affect vessel stability: ( 1 ) An increase in the vertical center of gravity at lightweight by more than 2 inches (51 millimeters) compared to the original lightweight value.
( 2 ) An increase or decrease of lightweight displacement by more than 3 percent of the original lightweight displacement.
( 3 ) A shift of the longitudinal center of gravity of more than 1 percent of the vessel's length.
( d ) In determining whether or not a vessel's stability has been adversely affected, a qualified individual must, at a minimum, consider the net effects on stability of any: ( 1 ) Reduction of the downflooding angle;
( 2 ) Increase in the maximum heeling moment caused by fishing gear or weight lifted over the side due to changes in lifting arrangement or capacity;
( 3 ) Reduction in freeing port area;
( 4 ) Increase in free surface effects, including increased free surface effects due to water on deck associated with any increase in length or height of bulwarks;
( 5 ) Increase in projected wind area;
( 6 ) Decrease in the angle of maximum righting arm;
( 7 ) Decrease in the area under the righting arm curve; and
( 8 ) Increase in the surface area on which ice can reasonably be expected to accumulate.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 83 (Tuesday, May 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 23838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2127]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel, Review of U01 Application on HIV, 
AIDS and Brain.
    Date: May 16, 2007.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 5635 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Abraham P. Bautista, PhD, Chief, Extramural 
Project Branch Review, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse & 
Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm 
3039, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-443-9737, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c0e0d1918051f180d0d2c010d050042020504420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="690b081c1d001a1d0808290408000547070001470e061f">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 23, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2127 Filed 4-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 (the “Report”), asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, RickBerry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and

 

2.  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ RICK BERRY          |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Rick  Berry             |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

November 8, 2004

 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. and will be retained by SandersMorris Harris Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
EX-10.11






AMENDMENT NUMBER 1




to the




EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

Between

KNBT BANCORP, INC.,

KEYSTONE NAZARETH BANK & TRUST COMPANY,

And

EUGENE T. SOBOL




WHEREAS, in connection with the entering into of the Agreement and Plan of Merger between
Keystone Savings Bank (now known as Keystone Nazareth Bank & Trust Company) (the ”Bank”) and First
Colonial Group, Inc. (“First Colonial”) (the “Merger Agreement”), the Bank and Eugene T. Sobol (the
“Executive”) entered into an Employment Agreement dated March 5, 2003 (referred to hereinafter as
the “Agreement”);



WHEREAS, in accordance with the terms of Section 29 of the Agreement and in connection with
the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, KNBT Bancorp, Inc., the
parent holding company of the Bank (the Company”), became a party to the Agreement (the Bank and
the Company are hereinafter referred to as the “Employers”);



WHEREAS, under the terms of the Agreement, the term “Effective Date” was defined as the
effective date of the merger of the Company and First Colonial (the “Merger”);




WHEREAS, the Effective Date of the Merger was October 31, 2003; and



WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of the Employers and Executive desire to amend the Agreement
to reflect certain mutually agreed upon revisions.



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein set forth, the Employers and
Executive do hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:



1. For purposes of the Agreement, Effective Date is hereby defined as being December 31, 2004 and
all references therein to such term will mean December 31, 2004.



2. All other sections and provisions in the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and
are incorporated by reference into this Amendment No. 1 except that the compensation of Executive
shall be that amount which is presently in effect as determined by the Boards of Directors of the
Employers and not the initial compensation referred to in Section 4(a) of the Agreement.




This Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement shall be deemed effective as of December 31, 2004.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment No. 1 to the
Agreement as of this 27th day of January 2005.



1




KNBT BANCORP, INC.



ATTEST:



	 	 	 
	/s/ Michele Linsky	 	By: /s/ Jeffrey P. Feather
	Witness

	 	Title: Chairman







ATTEST: KEYSTONE NAZARETH BANK & TRUST COMPANY



	 	 	 
	/s/ Michele Linsky	 	By: /s/ Scott V. Fainor
	Witness

	 	Title: President and Chief Executive Officer








	 	 	 	EXECUTIVE





	 	 	 
	/s/ Michele Linsky	 	By: /s/ Eugene T. Sobol
	Witness

	 	Eugene T. Sobol
	 
	 	 








2
Exhibit 12.1  I, Martin Cotter, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Portrush Petroleum Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the Annual Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.   Date: June 26, 2007  /s/ Martin Cotter Martin Cotter, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer      1
Exhibit 3.1

                            CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION

                           OF CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                         OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                        ICY SPLASH FOOD & BEVERAGE, INC.

                Under Section 105 of the Business Corporation Law
                             ----------------------

           It is hereby certified that:

           1.  The name of the corporation is Icy Splash Food & Beverage, Inc.

           2.  The instrument to be hereby corrected was filed by the Department
of State on April 29, 1999.

           3.  The nature of the informality, error, incorrect statement,
or defect of the said instrument to be hereby corrected is as follows: The
penultimate sentence of the eighth numbered paragraph incorrectly describes the
means of authorizing the instrument as by a written consent signed by the
holders of a majority of an outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon instead
of by a unanimous written consent signed by all the holders of all the
outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon.

           4.  The provision hereinabove described is hereby corrected to
read as follows:

               "Pursuant to Section 615 of the New York Business
               Corporation Law, such action was taken without a meeting
               by unanimous written consent, setting forth the amendment
               to the Certificate of Incorporation, signed by all the
               holders of all outstanding shares entitled to vote
               thereon. Said authorization was given subsequent to
               unanimous written consent of all the directors in
               accordance with the provisions of Section 708 of the New
               York Business Corporation Law."


Signed on August 19, 2005

                                            ICY SPLASH FOOD & BEVERAGE, INC.

                                             /s/ Joseph Aslan
                                            --------------------------
                                            Joseph Aslan
                                            President
Exhibit 32.1







Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Securities and Exchange Commission


450 Fifth Street, N.W


Washington, D.C. 20549





Ladies and Gentlemen:





The certification set forth below is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Raptor Pharmaceutical Corp. (the “Company”) and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) or its staff upon request.





Christopher M. Starr, Ph.D., the Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, and Kim R. Tsuchimoto, the Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, each certify that:







1.
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and






2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Raptor Pharmaceutical Corp.




This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 13th day of January, 2011.








By: /s/ Christopher M. Starr


Christopher M. Starr, Ph.D.


Chief Executive Officer and Director


(Principal Executive Officer)








By:  /s/ Kim R. Tsuchimoto


Kim R. Tsuchimoto


Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer


(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
§ 174.035 Definitions. ( a ) For the purpose of this subpart the following terms have the same definitions as given in subchapter IA of this chapter: ( 1 ) *Column stabilized unit.*
( 2 ) *Mobile offshore drilling unit.*
( 3 ) *Self-elevating unit.*
( 4 ) *Surface type unit.*
( b ) For the purpose of this subpart— ( 1 ) *Downflooding* means the entry of seawater through any opening that cannot be rapidly closed watertight, into the hull, superstructure, or columns of an undamaged unit due to heel, trim, or submergence of the unit.
( 2 ) *Downflooding angle* means the static angle from the intersection of the unit's centerline and waterline in calm water to the first opening through which downflooding can occur when subjected to a wind heeling moment (Hm) calculated in accordance with § 174.055.
( 3 ) *Normal operating condition* means a condition of a unit when loaded or arranged for drilling, field transit, or ocean transit.
( 4 ) *Severe storm condition* means a condition of a unit when loaded or arranged to withstand the passage of a severe storm.