alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Affinity Technology Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Joseph A. Boyle, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ Joseph A. Boyle
Joseph A. Boyle
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer
 and Chief Financial Officer
March 30, 2004
§ 169.688 Power supply. ( a ) The requirements of this section apply in lieu of subpart 111.10 of this chapter.
( b ) If a generator is used to provide electric power for any vital system listed in § 169.642 of this subchapter, at least two generating sets must be provided. At least one required generating set must be independent of the auxiliary propulsion machinery. A generator that is not independent of the auxiliary propulsion plant must meet the requirements of § 111.10-4(c) of this chapter. With any one generating set stopped, the remaining set(s) must provide the power necessary for each of the following: ( 1 ) Normal at sea load plus starting of the largest vital system load that can be started automatically or started from a space remote from the main distribution panel (switchboard).
( 2 ) All vital systems simultaneously with nonvital loads secured.
( c ) The adequacy of ship service generators must be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the OCMI during the initial inspection required by § 169.221 of this subchapter.
§ 310.64 Privileges. ( a ) Midshipmen may be granted a leave of absence of approximately four (4) weeks after completing each of the first, second and third years of training.
( b ) Classes and exercises are suspended on New Year's Day, Washington's Birthday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veterans' Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and such other days as may be designated by the President as holidays for Federal employees.
( c ) Midshipmen may be granted approximately 2 weeks leave during the period which includes Christmas Day and New Year's Day.
( d ) Liberty and other privileges are granted to midshipmen meriting them under Academy regulations.
( e ) Relatives and friends of midshipmen may visit at the Academy during such ours as the Superintendent may prescribe.
( f ) There shall be a Ship's Service Store maintained as a non-appropriated fund activity at the Academy primarily to serve the needs of the midshipmen.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,304
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            49,043
<LOANS>                                        131,733
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,736
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 190,911
<DEPOSITS>                                     164,965
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,652
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,237
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,057
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 190,911
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,370
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,239
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   191
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,800
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,063
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,063
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,737
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      270
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,460
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,341
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,703
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.715
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, James W. Kleifges, the Chief Financial Officer of Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that, to my knowledge:

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|(1) | This quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 ("Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                         



|      |                         | 
|----- | ----------------------- | 
|      |                         | 
|      | /s/ James W. Kleifges   | 
|      |                         | 
|By:   | James W. Kleifges       | 
|      | Chief Financial Officer
|      |                         | 
|Date: | October 31, 2005        |
§ 28.215 Guards for exposed hazards. ( a ) Each space on board a vessel must meet the requirements of this section.
( b ) Suitable hand covers, guards, or railing must be installed in way of machinery which can cause injury to personnel, such as gearing, chain or belt drives, and rotating shafting. This is not meant to restrict necessary access to fishing equipment such as winches, drums, or gurdies.
( c ) Each exhaust pipe from an internal combustion engine which is within reach of personnel must be insulated or otherwise guarded to prevent burns.
#### Elizabeth McM. Godley, Respondent, *v.*Crandall & Godley Company et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.

*Godley*v. *Crandall & Godley Go.,*134 App. Div. 950, modified.

(Argued January 4, 1910;

decided January 18, 1910.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial departments entered October 15, 1909, which affirmed an order of *580Special Term appointing a receiver of the defendant Crandall t% Godley Company and restraining said company and its directors from reducing its capital stock or distributing its assets.

The following questions were certified : *“*(1) Has the court in this action power to appoint a receiver of the defendant corporation ?

*“*(2) Upon any view of the facts presented by the record, had the court power to appoint a receiver of the defendant corporation *1*

“ (3) Upon any view of the facts presented by the record, had the court power to enjoin the defendant corporation from holding a meeting to reduce its capital stock ? ”

*Edgar T. Brackett*and *James J. Allen*for appellants.

W. *Russell Oshorn*and *David Bennett King*for respondent.

Order modified so as to limit receivership to property mentioned in paragraph XII of complaint, and as thus modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Questions certified answered as follows: 1. The court has not power in this action to appoint a receiver of the defendant corporation, but lias power to appoint a receiver of such of its property as is alleged to have been transferred and secured to the use of another corporation, to preserve the same during the pendency of the action. 2. The same statement answers the second question. 3. The court had power to enjoin the defendant corporation from holding a meeting to reduce its capital stock. No opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ".
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-8, PageID.398 Filed 04/07/15 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-8, PageID.399 Filed 04/07/15 Page 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of L.A.M. Pharmaceutical Corp.
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Joseph T. Slechta,
the President, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects the financial condition and results of the
Company. By:
    
    /s/ Joseph T. SlechtaJoseph T. Slechta, President, Chief Executive Officer andPrincipal Financial Officer
 May 14, 2004
§ 178.410 Drainage of flush deck vessels. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the weather deck on a flush deck vessel must be watertight and have no obstruction to overboard drainage.
( b ) Each flush deck vessel may have solid bulwarks in the forward one-third length of the vessel if: ( 1 ) The bulwarks do not form a well enclosed on all sides; and
( 2 ) The foredeck of the vessel has sufficient sheer to ensure drainage aft.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 966, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51357, Sept. 30, 1997]
# C_2012165EN.01000901.xml

| 9.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/9

---

Appeal brought on 5 March 2012 by Bernhard Rintisch against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 16 December 2011 in Case T-62/09: Bernhard Rintisch v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

(Case C-120/12 P)

2012/C 165/15

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Bernhard Rintisch (represented by: A. Dreyer, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Bariatrix Europe Inc., SAS

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Seventh Chamber of the General Court (Court of First Instance) of 16 December 2011 in Case T-62/09; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Seventh Chamber of the General Court (Court of First Instance) of 16 December 2011 in Case T-62/09;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant submits that the contested judgment should be annulled on the ground that the General Court infringed Article 74(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) (CMTR) [now Article 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (2)] and on the ground of misuse of power. According to the appellant the General Court wrongly interpreted Article 74/2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 by deciding that the Board of Appeal was right in not taking into account documents and evidence submitted by the appellant. The General Court wrongly decided that the Board lawfully refused to exercise discretion when refusing to take the aforementioned documents into account.

1

2

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark, OJ L 11, p. 1

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark, OJ L 78, p. 1

2

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 82 (Monday, April 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 21265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2119]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Schedule Change; Open Commission Meeting, 
April 25, 2007

April 25, 2007.
    The Federal Communications Commission previously announced its 
intention to hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, April 25, 2007 at 9:30 
a.m. The meeting has been postponed until 6:45 p.m. The prompt and 
orderly conduct of the Commission's business requires this change and 
no earlier announcement was practicable.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.

    Editorial Note: This document was received at the Office of the 
Federal Register on April 26, 2007.
[FR Doc. 07-2119 Filed 4-26-07; 12:47 pm]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
§ 117.150 Survival craft embarkation arrangements. ( a ) A launching appliance described in paragraph (c) of this section, or a marine evacuation system approved under approval series 160.175, must be provided for each inflatable liferaft and inflatable buoyant apparatus when either—
( b ) An embarkation ladder, approved in accordance with § 160.017 in subchapter Q of this chapter, or other standard specified by the Commandant, must be at each embarkation station if the distance from the embarkation deck to the vessel's lightest operating waterline is more than 3,050 millimeters (10 feet).
( c ) Each launching appliance for a davit-launched liferaft must include an automatic disengaging apparatus approved under 46 CFR part 160, subpart 160.170 and be either— ( 1 ) A davit approved under 46 CFR part 160, subpart 160.132 for use with a liferaft, with a winch approved under 46 CFR part 160, subpart 160.115 for use with a liferaft; or
( 2 ) A launching appliance approved on or before November 10, 2011 under approval series 160.163.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 911, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51350, Sept. 30, 1997; 62 FR 64305, Dec. 5, 1997; USCG-2010-0048, 76 FR 62973, Oct. 11, 2011]
2006 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

6-23-2006

Worthy v. NJ State Parole Bd

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 05-2634

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Worthy v. NJ State Parole Bd" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 845.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/845
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

NO. 05-2634

________________

EMMITT WORTHY, III,

 Appellant

vs.

N.J. STATE PAROLE BOARD; WILLIAM T. MCCARGO, Chairman;

JOHN D'AMICO, Chairman; EDWARD J. OSKAY, Chief Appeals Unit;

ROBERT M. EGLES, Hearing Officer; GAIL SUPERS, Supervisor District #8;

DAVID SOLTIS, Supervisor District #8; LAURIE HOAGLAND, Parole Officer;

JOHN MCCAFFERY, Parole Officer JOHN DOE, Joe Doe Hearing Officers

 ____________________________

On Appeal From the United States District Court

For the District of New Jersey

(D.C. Civ. No. 05-cv-01905)

District Judge: Honorable Robert B. Kugler

 ____________________________

Before: FISHER, ALDISERT AND WEIS, CIRCUIT JUDGES

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

At the direction of the Court, the opinion filed June 20, 2006 is hereby amended to

delete the stray footnote on page 5 of the opinion. The footnote appears as number 5 in

the body of the opinion; however inclusion of a fifth footnote was not intended.

For the Court,

 /s/ Marcia M. Waldron 

Clerk

Date: June 23, 2006

CMH/cc: EW, LAP
# C_2012013EN.01001501.xml

| 14.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/15

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 18 November 2011 — EMA v Commission

(Case T-116/11 R)

(Application for Interim measures - Research and technological development programme - Decision ending the participation in a project - Debit note - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of urgency)

2012/C 13/31

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Association médicale européenne (EMA) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A.Franchi, L. Picciano and N. di Castelnuovo)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by S. Delaude and N. Bambara, then S. Delaude and F. Moro, Agents, and D. Gullo, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the Commission decision of 5 November 2010 terminating the contracts concluded for two research projects and the debit note of 13 December 2010 informing the applicant of the establishment of debts in the execution of those contracts.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
# C_2012250EN.01001402.xml

| 18.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 250/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 250/14

---

Order of the General Court of 19 June 2012 — Hungary v Commission

(Case T-37/11) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Temporary instrument intended to finance actions at the new external borders of the European Union for the purpose of the implementation of the Schengen acquis and border control (Schengen Facility) - Contribution to Hungary in respect of the period from 2004 to 2006 - Recovery of part of the amount paid - Challengeable act - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 250/26

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hungary (represented by: Z. Fehér, K. Szíjjártó and G. Koós, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and F. Coudert, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for partial annulment of debit note No 3241011280 issued by the Commission on 28 October 2010 after the final report on the clearance of the accounts of the Schengen Facility concerning aid paid to Hungary during the period from 2004 to 2006 was sent to Hungary.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Hungary is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Hungary is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 26.3.2011.

1

---
Exhibit 32.3



Certification

Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2006 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Robert M. Little, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/ Robert M. Little, Jr.

Robert M. Little, Jr.

Chief Financial Officer

March 26, 2007
Exhibit
4(a)


 


RESOLUTION


 


TCF Financial Corporation


Compensation/Nominating/Corporate Governance
Committee


 


 


RE: TCF Shareholder Rights Agreement


 


WHEREAS,
the Corporation has maintained a Shareholder Rights Agreement dated as of May
12, 1999 (the “Agreement”); 


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY:


 


RESOLVED,
that an amendment to the Agreement is hereby approved.  Such amendment shall amend paragraph (b) of Section 7
of such Agreement to read as follows:


 


“(b) The Purchase Price for each one one-hundredth of
a Preferred Share pursuant to the exercise of a Right shall be $200.00 (two
hundred dollars), subject to adjustment from time to time as provided in
Sections 11 and 13 hereof and shall be payable in lawful money of the United
States of America in accordance with paragraph (c) below.”