alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011238EN.01001802.xml

| 13.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/18

---

Action brought on 2 May 2011 — Fraas v OHIM (Dark grey, light grey, light blue, dark blue, ochre and beige coloured checked pattern)

(Case T-231/11)

2011/C 238/32

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: V. Fraas GmbH (Helmbrechts-Wüstenselbitz, Germany) (represented by R. Kunze and G. Würtenberger, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 4 March 2011 in Case R 2041/2010-4 relating to Community trade mark application No 008 423 626 (figurative mark); |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 4 March 2011 in Case R 2041/2010-4 relating to Community trade mark application No 008 423 626 (figurative mark);

| — | Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark representing a dark grey, light grey, light blue, dark blue, ochre and beige coloured checked pattern for goods in Classes 18, 24, and 25 — application No 8 423 626.

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Partial rejection of the application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009, as the Community trade mark at issue has distinctive character, and infringement of Articles 75 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal did not examine the extensive factual and legal submissions of the applicant.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2012013EN.01000502.xml

| 14.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/5

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 20 October 2011 — Novartis Pharma GmbH v Apozyt GmbH

(Case C-535/11)

2012/C 13/10

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Claimant: Novartis Pharma GmbH

Claimant:

Defendant: Apozyt GmbH

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does the term ‘developed’ in the introductory sentence of the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 laying down Community procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency (1) extend to processes in which portions only of a medicinal product which has been developed and produced on a ready-to-use basis in accordance with the above procedures are drawn off into another container, after being prescribed and ordered at the time concerned by a doctor, if as a result of the process the composition of the medicinal product is not modified, and therefore in particular to the production of pre-filled syringes which have been filled with a medicinal product which is authorised under the regulation?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 136, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2012126EN.01000703.xml

| 28.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/7

---

Action brought on 21 February 2012 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-90/12)

2012/C 126/15

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: K. Simonsson and M. Owsiany-Hornung, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Poland

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by not adopting appropriate measures needed to comply with Articles 5 and 6 of Regulation (EC) No 847/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the negotiation and implementation of air service agreements between Member States and third countries (1) and in any event by not informing the Commission of such measures, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under those articles of the directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by not adopting appropriate measures needed to comply with Articles 5 and 6 of Regulation (EC) No 847/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the negotiation and implementation of air service agreements between Member States and third countries (1) and in any event by not informing the Commission of such measures, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under those articles of the directive;

1

| — | order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Article 5 of Regulation No 847/2004 requires Member States to ensure ‘a distribution of traffic rights among eligible [European Union] air carriers on the basis of a non-discriminatory and transparent procedure’. In addition, under Article 6 of the regulation, Member States are obliged to inform the Commission without delay of the procedures applied for the purposes of Article 5. The Commission publishes those procedures in the Official Journal. The carrying out of the procedures referred to in those provisions is dependent upon the adoption of an appropriate implementing regulation by the minister responsible for transport matters. That regulation had still not been adopted when the present action was brought and in any event the Polish authorities have not informed the Commission in that regard. In those circumstances, the Commission assumes that the carrying out of the procedures envisaged in Article 5 of Regulation No 847/2004 and the appropriate notification of the Commission on the basis of Article 6 of the regulation are not possible, given the lack of appropriate provisions in Polish law.

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 157, p. 7.

1

---
EXHIBIT 99.21

CONSENT OF EXPERT

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F
(the Form 40-F) of Cameco Corporation (the Corporation) to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

I hereby consent to reference to my name and my involvement in the preparation of, or supervision of the preparation of, scientific and
technical information in the following instances:



| | (a) | under the headings Operations and Development Projects  Uranium Operating Properties  McArthur River/Key Lake, Mineral Reserves and
Resources and Governance  Interest of Experts in the Corporations Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2011 dated February 24, 2012 for the McArthur River/Key Lake properties; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | under the heading Mineral Reserves and Resources in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation for the year
ended December 31, 2011 dated February 9, 2012 for the McArthur River/Key Lake properties,
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(collectively the
Technical Information) in the Form 40-F, and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of information derived from the Technical Information in the Form 40-F.

I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such Technical Information in the registration statements (Nos. 333-11736,
333-6180 and 333-139165) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Stock Option Plan, and registration statement (No. 333-139324) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Employee Share Ownership Plan.



|                           |  |                                                         
|-------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Sincerely,                
|                          
|/s/ Leslie (Les) D. Yesnik
|Name:                      |  | Leslie (Les) D. Yesnik, P. Eng.                         
|Title:                     |  | General Manager, Key Lake operations, Cameco Corporation
|                           | 
|Date:                      |  | February 24, 2012
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 12 (Friday, January 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2495]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-226]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, February 9, 2007.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-226 Filed 1-17-07; 11:27 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
#### § 4.03-4 Individual directly involved in a serious marine incident.

The term *individual directly involved in a serious marine incident* is an individual whose order, action or failure to act is determined to be, or cannot be ruled out as, a causative factor in the events leading to or causing a serious marine incident.

[CGD 86-067, 53 FR 47077, Nov. 21, 1988]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending January 27, 2007

|Filer                        | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | End of Comment Period                                
|---------------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|ASSABET VALLEY BANCORP       | * 3A5* 3A3    | Assabet Valley Bancorp, Hudson, Massachusetts to acquire Westborough Bancorp, MHC, Westborough Financial Services, Inc. and The Westborough Bank, all located in Westborough, Massachusetts, pursuant to sections 3(a)(3) and 3(a)(5) of the BHC Act.          | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                   | Not available
|Federal Register:            | Not available
|NEW ENGLAND BANCSHARES, INC. | * 4c8* 3A1    | New England Bancshares, Inc., Enfield, CT - section 3(a)(1)/4(c)(8) application to acquire First Valley Bancorp, Inc., Bristol, CT and its subsidiary bank, Valley Bank, Bristol, CT, and to retain Enfield Federal Savings and Loan Association, Enfield, CT. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:02/26/2007   
|Newspaper:                   | Not available
|Federal Register:            | 02/26/2007   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 95 (Thursday, May 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2431]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Amended 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Advisory Neurological Disorders and Stroke Council, May 24, 2007, 8 
a.m. to May 24, 2007, 10 a.m., National Institutes of Health, Building 
31, 31 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the 
Federal Register on May 1, 2007, FR: 07-2128; 72.
    The Clinical Trials Subcommittee meeting scheduled for May 24, 
2007, open and closed sessions have changed to closed from 8-8:45 a.m. 
and open from 8:45-10 a.m. The meeting is partially closed to the 
public.

    Dated: May 8, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2431 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         986,698
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,533
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,045,322
<PP&E>                                       3,563,527
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,796,331
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,876,493
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          113,756
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,762,737
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,876,493
<SALES>                                      1,371,072
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,399,603
<CGS>                                          613,443
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  613,443
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               191,051
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                595,109
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            595,109
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   595,109
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    58.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    58.92
        


</TABLE>
#### § 308.535 Certificate to be attached to final closing report, Form MA-313-B.

The Standard Form of Certificate, Form MA-313-B, shall be attached to the final closing report after cancellation of the policy, and may be obtained from MARAD's underwriting agent or MARAD.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

ALECIA WHEELER, 

Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-11691

HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH 

vs. 

SYNCHRONY BANK, 

Defendant. 

____________________________/ 

ORDER OF ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSURE 

Pursuant to a stipulation agreed upon by all parties during a status conference held on 

August 31, 2015, the parties will proceed to arbitration. The case will be administratively 

closed, subject to reopening for the issuance of a judgment or for other good cause. 

 SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 31, 2015 s/Mark A. Goldsmith 

 Detroit, Michigan MARK A. GOLDSMITH 

United States District Judge 

2:15-cv-11691-MAG-RSW Doc # 13 Filed 08/31/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 67
§ 197.324 Diver's safety harness. Each safety harness used in surface-supplied diving must have— ( a ) A positive buckling device; and
( b ) An attachment point for the umbilical life line that— ( 1 ) Distributes the pulling force of the umbilical over the diver's body; and
( 2 ) Prevents strain on the mask or helmet.
**EXHIBIT 99.7**

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

To the Shareholders and Board Directors of Cameco Corporation 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Cameco Corporation as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of Cameco Corporation’s management. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. 

We conducted our audits in accordance with thestandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An auditincludes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating theoverall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

In our opinion, the consolidatedfinancial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Cameco Corporation as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and its consolidated financial performance and itsconsolidated cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Cameco Corporation’s internalcontrol over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), andour report dated February 7, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Cameco Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting. 

As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, Cameco Corporation has changed its method of accounting for interests in joint arrangementsand employee benefits for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 due to the adoption of IFRS 11 – Joint Arrangements and IAS 19R—Employee Benefits and as a result includes the presentation of the statement offinancial position as at January 1, 2012. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Chartered Accountants 

Saskatoon, Canada 

February 7, 2014
§ 46.05-10 Foreign voyage. ( a ) A foreign voyage for the purpose of marking passenger vessels with subdivision load lines is a voyage by sea between a port under the jurisdiction of the United States and a port of a foreign country, its colonies, territories, or protectorates, or conversely (a voyage exclusively on the Great Lakes excepted).
§ 30.01-6 Application to vessels on an international voyage. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section, the regulations in this subchapter that apply to a vessel on an *international voyage* apply to a vessel that: ( 1 ) Is mechanically propelled and of at least 500 gross tons; and
( 2 ) Is engaged on a voyage: ( i ) From a country to which the International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea, 1974 (SOLAS 74) applies, to a port outside that country or the reverse;
( ii ) From any territory, including the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, all possessions of the United States, and all lands held by the United States under a protectorate or mandate, whose international relations are the responsibility of a contracting SOLAS 74 government, or which is administered by the United Nations, to a port outside that territory or the reverse; or
( iii ) Between the contiguous states of the United States and the states of Hawaii or Alaska or between the states of Hawaii and Alaska.
( b ) The regulations that apply to a vessel on an *international voyage* in this subchapter do not apply to ships engaged on a voyage solely on the Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence River as far east as a straight line drawn from Cap des Rosiers to West Point, Anticosti Island and, on the north side of Anticosti Island, the 63rd Meridian;
( c ) The Commandant or his authorized representative may exempt any vessel on an international voyage from the requirements of this subchapter if the vessel: ( 1 ) Makes a single international voyage in exceptional circumstances; and
( 2 ) Meets safety requirements prescribed for the voyage by the Commandant.
( d ) The Commandant or his authorized representative may exempt any vessel from the construction requirements of this subchapter if the vessel does not proceed more than 20 nautical miles from the nearest land in the course of its voyage.
[CGD 72-131R, 38 FR 29320, Oct. 24, 1973, as amended by CGD 80-123, 45 FR 64586, Sept. 30, 1980; CGD 90-008, 55 FR 30660, July 26, 1990; CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25286, May 20, 1996; USCG-2001-10224, 66 FR 48619, Sept. 21, 2001]