alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 294.33 Administrative determinations. ( a ) *Policy.* An Agreement Holder who disagrees with the findings, interpretations, or decisions of MARAD with respect to the administration of this part or any other dispute or complaint concerning the Agreement Holder's TSP Operating Agreement(s) may submit an appeal to the Administrator. The appeals must be made in writing to the Maritime Administrator, within 60 days following the date of the document notifying the Agreement Holder of the administrative determination of MARAD. Such an appeal should be addressed to the Maritime Administrator, Attn.: TSP Operating Agreement Appeals, Maritime Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590 or via email to *sealiftsupport@dot.gov .* An appeal is a prerequisite to exhausting administrative remedies.
( b ) *DoD determinations.* 46 U.S.C. chapter 534 assigns joint and separate roles and responsibilities to the Secretary and the SecDef. The Administrator and the Commander will make joint and separate findings, interpretations, and decisions necessary to implement 46 U.S.C. chapter 534. An Agreement Holder who disagrees with the initial findings, interpretations, or decisions regarding the implementation of 46 U.S.C. chapter 534—whether joint or separate in nature—must communicate such disagreement to MARAD. Any disagreement or dispute of an Agreement Holder may, where determined appropriate by MARAD, be transferred to the Director of Policy and Plans, USTRANSCOM for resolution. An Agreement Holder who disagrees with the findings, interpretations, or decisions of the Director of Policy and Plans, USTRANSCOM, with respect to the administration of this part, may submit an appeal to the Commander. Such an appeal must be made in writing to the Commander within 60 days following the date of the document notifying the Agreement Holder of the administrative determination of the Director of Policy and Plans. Such an appeal should be addressed to the Commander, United States Transportation Command, 508 Scott Drive, Scott Air Force Base, IL 62225-5357. or via email to *transcom.scott.tccc.mbx.commander@mail.mil .*
( c ) *Process.* The Administrator, or the Commander in the case of a DoD determination, may require the person making the request to furnish additional information, or proof of factual allegations, and may order any proceeding appropriate in the circumstances. The decision of the Administrator, or the Commander in the case of a DoD determination, will be administratively final.
(Authority: 46 U.S.C. chapter 534, 49 CFR 1.93)
§ 15.530 Large passenger vessels. ( a ) The owner or operator of a U.S. flag large passenger vessel must ensure that any non-resident alien holding a Coast Guard-issued MMC described in part 12, subpart H of this subchapter is provided the rights, protections, and benefits of the International Labor Organization's Merchant Shipping (Minimum Standards) Convention of 1976.
( b ) On U.S. flag large passenger vessels, non-resident aliens holding a Coast Guard-issued MMC described in part 12, subpart H of this subchapter— ( 1 ) May only be employed in the steward's department on the vessel(s) specified on the MMC or accompanying Coast Guard letter under § 12.811 of this subchapter;
( 2 ) May only be employed for an aggregate period of 36 months of actual service on all authorized U.S. flag large passenger vessels combined, under § 12.811 of this subchapter;
( 3 ) May not perform watchstanding, engine room duty watch, or vessel navigation functions, under § 12.811 of this subchapter; and
( 4 ) May perform emergency-related duties only if, under § 12.811 of this subchapter— ( i ) The emergency-related duties do not require any other rating or endorsement, except lifeboatman as specified in § 12.811 of this subchapter;
( ii ) The non-resident alien has completed familiarization and basic training, as required in § 15.1105 of this part;
( iii ) The non-resident alien, if serving as a lifeboatman, has the necessary lifeboatman's endorsement; and
( iv ) The non-resident alien has completed the training for crewmembers on passenger ships performing duties involving safety or care for passengers, as required in part 12, subpart I of this subchapter.
( c ) No more than 25 percent of the total number of ratings on a U.S. flag large passenger vessel may be aliens, whether admitted to the United States for permanent residence or authorized for employment in the United States as non-resident aliens.
( d ) The owner or operator of a U.S. flag large passenger vessel employing non-resident aliens holding Coast Guard-issued MMCs described in part 12, subpart H of this subchapter must— ( 1 ) Retain custody of all non-resident alien MMCs for the duration of employment, under § 12.811 of this subchapter; and
( 2 ) Return all non-resident alien MMCs to the Coast Guard upon termination of employment, under § 12.811 of this subchapter.
( e ) The owner or operator of a U.S. flag large passenger vessel employing non-resident aliens holding Coast Guard-issued MMCs described in part 12, subpart H of this subchapter is subject to the civil penalty provisions specified in 46 U.S.C. 8103(f), for any violation of this section.
[USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 78003, Dec. 24, 2013, as amended by USCG-2018-0874, 84 FR 30882, June 28, 2019]
Page of 1 4

Request for amendment to FAA Exemption 333 Exemption No. 14220 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-4895

Contact: Richard Tulloch President Yovem LLC 623.205.0712 www.yovem.com 

### LLCPage of 2 4

To whom it may concern: Date: 01/24/16 Re: Exemption No. 14220 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-4895 Yovem LLC is requesting amendments to their exemption 333 as listed and described below. The purpose for the amendments is to be able to offer additional services that will allow Yovem LLC to be competitive as company. Each amendment will serve to increase the efficiency and functionality a company needs to grow. 1. Addition Aircraft Yovem LLC would like to add an additional UASs to the existing exemption. The new crafts are the DJI’s Inspire series. Manufacturer: DJI

• This additional aircrafts meets all weight, speed and other criteria spelled out in exemption No. 14220.

• The DJI Inspire series allows the operator to remove and upgrade the camera per the manufacturer.

• The DJI Inspire series will only be use for operations listed in Exemption No. 14220 or any approved operations in this amendment.

• All DJI Inspire documents and manuals will be attached and send with this amendment. 2. Additional Operations Using UASs Yovem LLC would like to add additional operations using UAS to our existing exemption. Additional operations would include conducting aerial photography and videography using approved unmanned aircraft system (UAS) for.

• Agriculture A. Crop Monitoring B. Live Stock Monitoring

• Inspections A. Roof Inspections B. Solar Panel Inspections C. Civil Infrastructures InspectionsPage of 3 4

D. Electrical Infrastructures Inspections E. Terrain Inspections F. Real Estate and Commercial Properties

• Construction A. Construction Planning B. Construction Progress Monitoring C. Job Site Monitoring D. Surveying E. Aerial Mapping

• Appraisals A. Insurance Appraisals B.Insurance Claims C. Real Estate Appraisal D. Property And Land Appraisals

• Media A. Traffic Watch B. Journalism

• Disaster Relief

• Security A. Large Commercial Buildings B. Factors C. Power plants

• Weddings

• EventsPage of 4 4

3. Relief from limitation No. 6 Visual Observer (VO) requirement. Yovem LLC request the removal of the Visual Observer (VO) requirements when operating in rural areas or ares not congested by people or buildings. Certain jobs such as surveying, aerial mapping and even farming can be conducted safely without a visual observer. Removal of this particular limitation will help Yovem LLC be more competitive by reducing cost and transferring that extra savings to our customers.
Sincerely, Richard Tulloch CEO Yovem LLC

3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JASON LEE BROWN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 328 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of November, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

and Motion to Remand are DENIED

.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LABARBARA ALFORD, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO: 15-CV-11464-DT

LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Mona K. Majzoub pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In her report filed on January 4, 2017, the

magistrate judge recommended that this court grant Defendant Liberty Mutual Fire

Insurance’s Motion for Summary Judgment. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28

U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived.1

Having reviewed the file and the report, the court concludes that the findings and

conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and ADOPTS the same for purposes of this

Order.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s

Report and Recommendation, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment {Dkt # 13} is

GRANTED and the above action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

 S/Robert H. Cleland

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: February 1, 2017

1

The failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the court from its duty to

independently review the motion. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

2:15-cv-11464-RHC-MKM Doc # 22 Filed 02/01/17 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 332
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record and/or 

pro se parties on this date, February 1, 2017, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Shawna C. Burns

Case Manager Generalist

(810) 984-2056

2

2:15-cv-11464-RHC-MKM Doc # 22 Filed 02/01/17 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 333
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Annual Report of V-ONE  Corporation  ("Company") on
Form  10-K for the  fiscal  year  ended  December  31,  2003 as  filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange   Commission  on  the  date  hereof  ("Report"),   the
undersigned,  in the capacity and on the date indicated below,  hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.


Date:  March 25, 2004               By:  /s/ Margaret E. Grayson
                                         ----------------------------
                                          Name:   Margaret E. Grayson
                                          Title:  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Principal Financial Officer
§ 201.26 Former employees. ( a ) No former officer or employee of the Administration, after his or her employment with the Administration has ceased, shall act as agent or attorney for anyone other than the United States in connection with any particular matter in which a specific party or parties are involved and in which the United States is a party or has a direct and substantial interest and in which the former officer or employee participated personally and substantially as an officer or employee of the Maritime Administration through decision, approval, disapproval, recommendation, the rendering of advice, investigation, or otherwise while so employed by the Maritime Administration.
( b ) No former officer or employee of the Administration shall practice, appear, or represent anyone, directly or indirectly, other than the United States, before the Administration in any matter for a period of 1 year subsequent to the termination of his or her employment with the Administration in connection with any proceeding, application, request for a ruling or other determination, contract, claim, controversy, or other particular matter involving a specific party or parties in which the United States is a party or directly and substantially interested and which was under his or her official responsibility as an officer or employee of the Administration at any time during the last year of his or her service.
( c ) Any person in doubt as to the applicability of paragraph (a) or (b) of this § 201.26 to a particular case or to the postemployment activities of a former officer or employee of the Administration may address an application to the Administration for the Administration's consent to appear, stating his former connection with the Administration or predecessor agency, identifying the matter in which he or she desires to appear and describe in detail his or her participation in or responsibility for the particular matter and the specific party or parties involved and the extent, if any, in which the former officer or employee had participated while employed by the Administration. The applicant shall be promptly advised as to his or her privilege to appear in the particular matter. Separate consents to appear must be obtained in each particular matter.
[G.O. 41, 3d Rev., Amdt. 3, 36 FR 4377, Mar. 5, 1971]
§ 35.30-40 Flammable liquid and gas fuels as ship's stores—TB/ALL. Flammable liquids and gases other than diesel fuel, to be used as fuel for approved equipment must satisfy the following: ( a ) Stowage must be in containers approved by DOT or A.S.M.E. for the contents carried, or in a portable safety container approved by a recognized testing laboratory for the contents carried.
( b ) The contents must be marked on the containers, and the containers must be labeled in accordance with DOT requirements for flammable liquids and gases.
( c ) Containers must be stowed on or above the weather deck in locations designated by the master. Containers specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section which do not exceed a capacity of five gallons may be stowed below the weather deck in a paint or lamp locker.
[CGD 80-009, 48 FR 36459, Aug. 11, 1983, as amended by CGD 86-033, 53 FR 36024, Sept. 16, 1988; CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51199, Sept. 30, 1997]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 92 (Monday, May 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27151-27152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2379]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Parole Commission

[(Public Law 94-409) (5 U.S.C. 552b)]


Record of Vote of Meeting Closure

    I, Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Chairman of the United States Parole 
Commission, was present at a meeting of said Commission, which started 
at approximately 1:30 p.m., on Thursday, April 26, 2007, at the U.S. 
Parole Commission, 5550 Friendship Boulevard, 4th Floor, Chevy Chase, 
Maryland 20815. The purpose of the meeting was to decide four petitions 
for reconsideration pursuant to 28 CFR 2.27. Five Commissioners were 
present, constituting a quorum when the vote to close the meeting was 
submitted.
    Public announcement further describing the subject matter of the 
meeting and certifications of General Counsel that this meeting may be 
closed by vote of the Commissioners present were submitted to the 
Commissioners prior to the conduct of any other business. Upon motion 
duly made, seconded, and carried, the following Commissioners voted 
that the meeting be closed: Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Cranston J. 
Mitchell, Deborah A.

[[Page 27152]]

Spagnoli, Isaac Fulwood, Jr., and Patricia Cushwa.
    In witness whereof, I make this official record of the vote taken 
to close this meeting and authorize this record to be made available to 
the public.

    Dated: April 27, 2007.
Edward F. Reilly, Jr.,
Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-2379 Filed 5-9-07; 4:24 pm]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
**EXHIBIT ITEM 32.1**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities andExchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

March 26, 2008

 

Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr., theChief Executive Officer of Northern California Bancorp, Inc. certifies:

 

i.                  that this annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

ii.               that information contained annual reporton Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations  of Northern CaliforniaBancorp, Inc.

 
|   | /s/ Charles T.  Chrietzberg, Jr. |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Charles T.  Chrietzberg, Jr.     |
|   | Chief Executive Officer               |
|   | and President                         |

 

----
#### § 385.50 Scope.

Sections 385.51 and 385.52 set forth the criteria to be used by MarAd in evaluating all projects and all potential recipients prior to award of a grant or cooperative agreement.
Editorial Note on Part 161
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 161 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49238, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 161.012-13 Production tests and inspections. ( a ) The manufacturer of approved lights must randomly select a sample of ten lights from each lot of lights produced. Each lot must not exceed 1,000 lights. At least nine of the ten lights, when tested in accordance with the test described in § 161.012-11(c), must meet the test criteria prescribed by that section. If less than nine lights meet the test criteria, another random sample of ten lights must be taken and tested. If less than nine of these lights meet the test criteria, none of the lights in the lot may be sold as Coast Guard approved equipment.
( b ) The Coast Guard does not inspect lights approved under this subpart on a regular schedule. However, the Commandant may select samples and conduct tests and examinations whenever necessary to determine whether the lights are being manufactured in compliance with the requirements in this subpart.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the quarterly report of Ecosphere Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Dennis McGuire, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|/s/ Dennis McGuire                                                  
|Dennis McGuire
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Dated:  August 21, 2017













In connection with the quarterly report of Ecosphere Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David Brooks, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|/s/ David Brooks                                                  
|David Brooks
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

Dated: August 21, 2017
Forwarded by Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/06/2010 09:24 PM

From:    Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US                                                       

To:     Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov                                                      

Cc:     Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Steven Silverman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA             

Date:   07/31/2010 05:23 PM                                                              

Subject:     Question on the 1000 foot requirement for open clinker piles.                    

Dear Courtney:

This is in response to your question on open clinker piles in your comments.

(See attached file: In the SCAQMD regulation.docx)

Keith W. Barnett

USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG

Mail Code D243‐02

Research Triangle Park, NC  27711

919‐541‐5605

barnett.keith@epa.gov
In the SCAQMD regulation, there are different requirements 

for active vs. inactive open clinker piles. An inactive pile is 

one that had not been disturbed for 30 consecutive days. In 

addition, the ACAQMD rule has different requirements for clinker 

piles that are 1,000 feet or less form the facility propertyline. This 1000 foot criterion was a mutually agreed number 

among the stakeholders (both industry and environmental groups) 

involved in developing the regulation.1 Given the lack of 

additional data, we saw no reason to change this criterion. 

More information on this rule is available at 

http://www.aqmd.gov/hb/gb_cal95.html. 

 

1

 Telecon with Tuyet-Le Pham, South Coast Air Quality Management 

District. June 29, 2010.
#### § 326.1 Purpose.

This part states that the Maritime Administration (MARAD) shall be responsible for providing or obtaining marine protection and indemnity (P&I) insurance for any vessel that has been placed in the National Defense Reserve Fleet (NDRF), which includes the Ready Reserve Force component, which vessel is assigned under a General Agency Agreement. These various forms of Agreements are entered into by the United States, acting by and through the National Shipping Authority, MARAD, and a private company (Agent). An agreement also contains procedures for the Agent to report accidents and occurrences of a P&I nature to MARAD and to report and settle P&I claims.