alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 12.1**

CERTIFICATION

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Cimatron Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure control and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and


5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.


/s/ Zvika Naggan*Zvika Naggan Chief Executive Officer
  Date: June 29, 2004

* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Companys offices and will be furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                     JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                51,286
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                        361,266
<ALLOWANCES>                           5,294
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     414,329
<PP&E>                               162,064
<DEPRECIATION>                        74,720
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       651,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                288,563
<BONDS>                               41,617
<COMMON>                                 353
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                           389,752
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         651,851
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     727,947
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        480,924
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     139,816
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         757
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     1,217
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       41,798
<INCOME-TAX>                          15,465
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   26,333
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                          26,333
<EPS-BASIC>                            .78
<EPS-DILUTED>                            .78


</TABLE>
Case 2:15-cr-20004-SJM-EAS ECF No. 1, PageID.1 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:15-cr-20004-SJM-EAS ECF No. 1, PageID.2 Filed 05/19/14 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:15-cr-20004-SJM-EAS ECF No. 1, PageID.3 Filed 05/19/14 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:15-cr-20004-SJM-EAS ECF No. 1, PageID.4 Filed 05/19/14 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:15-cr-20004-SJM-EAS ECF No. 1, PageID.5 Filed 05/19/14 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:15-cr-20004-SJM-EAS ECF No. 1, PageID.6 Filed 05/19/14 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:15-cr-20004-SJM-EAS ECF No. 1, PageID.7 Filed 05/19/14 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:15-cr-20004-SJM-EAS ECF No. 1, PageID.8 Filed 05/19/14 Page 8 of 8
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO 

Ex parte:

Aprobación de Cambio de Estatus 

Inactivo de febrero de 2024

2024 TSPR 28

213 DPR ___

Número del Caso: EM-2024-0004

Fecha: 26 de marzo de 2024

Materia: Aprobación de Cambio de Estatus Inactivo de febrero de 2024.

Este documento está sujeto a los cambios y correcciones del proceso 

de compilación y publicación oficial de las decisiones del Tribunal 

Supremo. Su distribución electrónica se hace como un servicio público 

a la comunidad.
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO

Ex parte:

Aprobación de Cambio de 

Estatus Inactivo de 

febrero de 2024

 RESOLUCIÓN

En San Juan, Puerto Rico, a 26 de marzo de 2024.

 Durante el periodo de febrero de 2024, este 

Tribunal autorizó el cambio a estatus como Abogado(a) 

Inactivo(a) a los(as) abogados(as) siguientes:

Goyco Amador, Pedro G. 4,311

Lugo Mariani, David 4,808

Santini Morales, Carlos M. 4,850

Palmer Ramos, Carlos M. 5,009

Olivencia Font, Oscar O. 5,169

Pacheco Fraticelli, Noel 6,028

Yunqué López, Jossie 7,568

Díaz García, Sheila A. 7,744

Izquierdo Santiago, Orlando A. 8,392

Rivera Otero, Juan 8,597

Miles, Wilmaris 9,738

Vega Lugo, María D. 10,261

Ramírez Toro, Feliberto 10,517

EM-2024-0004
EM-2024-0004 2

Cabrera Vargas, Pablo 11,010

Rosado Medina, Rufino A. 15,773

De San Román Casasnovas, Alexandra 19,683

Rivera Díaz, Oscar 19,692

Morales Román, Roberto A. 20,721

Publíquese.

 Lo acordó el Tribunal y certifica el Secretario del 

Tribunal Supremo.

 Javier O. Sepúlveda Rodríguez

 Secretario del Tribunal Supremo
**Exhibit      32.2                                           **

**Certification      Pursuant to**

**Section      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| 1.   | The                Company's Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September                30,                2005, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the                "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section                13(a)                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operation                of the                Company. |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**In      Witness Whereof**

| /s/                H. Ravi Brar    H.                Ravi BrarChief                Financial Officer and Vice                President of Human Resources  |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00223-CV

Raul Cantu Jr.

v.

Cynthia Perez

On appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 7 of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. F-1706-17-7

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are taxed against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 7, 2018
MORRISON MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS, INC.

EXHIBIT 21.1             List of Subsidiaries

    State of Incorporation - Arizona
              Drake Management Services, Inc.

    State of Incorporation - Delaware
              Morrison Investment Company, Inc.

    State of Incorporation - Georgia
              Culinary Solutions, Inc.
              Morrison Team Services, Inc.

    State of Incorporation - Illinois
              Morrison Holding Company

    State of Incorporation - Tennessee
              Culinary Concepts, Inc.

    State of Incorporation - Pennsylvania
              Culinary Service Network, Inc.
              Custom Management Corporation

              Custom Management Corporation of Pennsylvania
              Morrison Custom Management Corporation of Pennsylvania
              John C. Metz & Associates, Inc.

    State of Incorporation - Texas
              Morrison's Healthcare of Texas, Inc.
#### CRYSTAL HOLDING COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PROSECUTOR, v. TOWN OF WESTFIELD, AND SAMUEL ARMSTRONG, HJALMAR L. BECKER, EUGENE C. HANFORD, THEODORE H. LUDWIG AND DENNIS M. LEVER, CONSTITUTING THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF SAID TOWN OF WESTFIELD, DEFENDANTS.

Submitted May 18, 1929

Decided November 7, 1929.

*976Before Justices Teenchaed, Lloyd and Case.

For the prosecutor, *Stamler & Koestler.*

For the defendants, *Paul Q. Oliver.*

Pee Cueiam.

■ This was an application for a writ of certiorari, a rule to show cause why the writ should not issue having been allowed by Mr. Justice Kalisch; but there is a stipulation by counsel, wherein it is agreed that this court shall consider the ease as if the writ had been actually granted, and that the determination of the court shall be binding upon the parties as if heard upon a writ of *certiorari.*

The proceedings will therefore be considered as bringing up for review a determination of the board of adjustment in an appeal of the Crystal Holding Company from a refusal of the building inspector to issue a permit for the erection of an apartment house at *262*Prospect street, Westfield, the erection of which was prohibited by a zoning ordinance.

We think that the record before us will not justify us in disturbing the determination of the board of adjustment. Prospect street at the point in question is but twenty-nine feet wide between the curbs. Near by is a school where congestion has resulted in accidents. In short, we think it appears that there was evidence before the board to justify the finding of the board that the erection of an apartment house "would tend to further congest traffic at an already dangerous spot and would add greatly to the peril of school children who were obliged to pass that way.”

It therefore appears to us that the decision of this court in *Bellofatto*v. *Board of Adjustment of*Montclair, 6 *N. J. Mis. R. 512,*a case where the action of the board was the same and for the same reason, and where the action of the board was sustained, is for all practical purposes conclusive as to the ease at bar. The case is also controlled so far as this *977court is concerned, by *Kilay*v. Quigley, 6 *Id.*623, a case very similar to this in all essential features.

The writ of *certiorari*(which may be assumed to have been issued) will be dismissed, with costs.
§ 42.15-10 Doors. ( a ) All access openings in bulkheads at ends of enclosed superstructures shall be fitted with doors of steel or other equivalent material, permanently and strongly attached to the bulkhead, and framed, stiffened and fitted so that the whole structure is of equivalent strength to the unpierced bulkhead and weathertight when closed. The means for securing these doors weathertight shall consist of gaskets and clamping devices or other equivalent means and shall be permanently attached to the bulkhead or to the doors themselves, and the doors shall be so arranged that they can be operated from both sides of the bulkhead.
( b ) Except as otherwise provided in these regulations, the height of the sills of access openings in bulkheads at ends of enclosed superstructures shall be at least 15 inches above the deck.
[CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10060, July 12, 1968]
Editorial Note on Part 162
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 162.028-4 Marine type label. ( a ) In addition to all other markings, every portable extinguisher must bear a label containing the Coast Guard approval number, thus: “Marine Type USCG Type Approval No. 162.028/____.”
( b ) All such labels are to be obtained only from the recognized laboratory and will remain under its control until attached to product found acceptable under its inspection and labeling program.
[CGFR 60-36, 25 FR 10640, Nov. 5, 1960, as amended by CGFR 64-19, 29 FR 7360, June 5, 1964; USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48278, July 22, 2016]
# C_2013225EN.01004902.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/49

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 March 2013 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-393/12 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Word mark HELLIM - Opposition by the proprietor of the Community word mark HALLOUMI - Opposition dismissed)

2013/C 225/87

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Organismos Kypriakis Galaktokomikis Viomichanias (represented by: C. Milbradt and A. Schwarz, Rechtsanwältinnen)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 June 2012 in Case T-534/10 Organismos Kypriakis Galaktokomikis Viomichanias v OHIM — Garmo (HELLIM) by which the General Court dismissed an action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 September 2010 relating to opposition proceedings between Organismos Kypriakis Galaktokomikis Viomichanias and Garmo AG — Likelihood of confusion — Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1)

Organismos Kypriakis Galaktokomikis Viomichanias

OHIM — Garmo (HELLIM)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | The Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 343, 10.11.2012.

1

---
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending October 7, 2006

|Filer                      | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                          
|-------------------------- | ----------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|MARLBOROUGH BANCSHARES MHC | * 3A1* 3A3  | Application by Marlborough Bancshares, MHC and Marlborough Bancshares, Inc., both of Marlborough, Massachusetts, to become a mutual bank holding company and stock bank holding company, respectively, by acquiring Marlborough Savings Bank, Marlborough, Massachusetts, pursuant to sections 3(a)(1)and 3(a)(3)of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. | Newspaper:10/09/2006Federal Register:10/12/2006
|Newspaper:                 | 10/09/2006 
|Federal Register:          | 10/12/2006 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 185.702 Maintenance. ( a ) The manufacturer's instructions for onboard maintenance of survival craft, rescue boats, and launching appliances, manufactured on or after March 11, 1996, must be onboard a vessel of more than 19.8 meters (65 feet) in length and readily available for a vessel of not more than 19.8 meters (65 feet) in length. The instructions must also be readily available at each inspection for certification and reinspection.
( b ) The owner or managing operator shall make sure that maintenance is carried out in accordance with the instructions required under paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) The cognizant OCMI may accept, instead of the instructions required under paragraph (a) of this section, a shipboard planned maintenance program that includes the items listed in that paragraph.
( d ) The inspection and maintenance of the equipment listed in paragraph (a) of this section shall be logged or otherwise documented for review by the Coast Guard upon request.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2359 

To ensure parity between the temporary duty imposed on ethanol and tax 

credits provided on ethanol. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2009 

Mr. ENGEL (for himself and Mr. BARTLETT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To ensure parity between the temporary duty imposed on 

ethanol and tax credits provided on ethanol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Imported Ethanol Par5 ity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ETHANOL TAX PARITY. 

7 Not later than 30 days after the date of the enact8 ment of this Act, and semiannually thereafter, the Presi9 dent shall reduce the temporary duty imposed on ethanol 

10 under subheading 9901.00.50 of the Harmonized Tariff 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2359 IH

1 Schedule of the United States by an amount equal to the 

2 reduction in any Federal income or excise tax credit under 

3 section 40(h), 6426(b), or 6427(e)(1) of the Internal Rev4 enue Code of 1986 and take any other action necessary 

5 to ensure that the combined temporary duty imposed on 

6 ethanol under such subheading 9901.00.50 and any other 

7 duty imposed under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

8 the United States is equal to, or lower than, any Federal 

9 income or excise tax credit applicable to ethanol under the 

10 Internal Revenue Code of 1986. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
§ 38.15-15 Electrical installations—TB/ALL. ( a ) All electrical installations shall comply with the requirements contained in this subchapter and in subchapter J (Electrical Engineering) of this chapter for tank vessels, except as otherwise specified in this part.
( b ) Spaces containing cargo pumps, compressors, and piping are considered as equivalent to a tank vessel pumproom, and no electrical devices, except Coast Guard approved intrinsically safe devices, shall be installed in these spaces. Electric motors shall be segregated from these spaces by a gastight bulkhead. Electric lighting of the explosion-proof type may be installed in these spaces provided all switching is done from outside the space.
( c ) All cargo tanks, piping, valves, etc., shall be effectively grounded to the vessel's hull. Tanks with an insulated inner shell (primary barrier) shall have an effective grounding bond to the outer shell (secondary barrier) or to the vessel's hull.
( d ) Electric submerged motor cargo pumps may be used, when in compliance with the following requirements and subject to approval by the Commandant. ( 1 ) Design details of the submerged motor pump, with an evaluation of the cooling efficiency of the product being pumped, shall be submitted.
( 2 ) Provisions shall be made to exclude air from the tanks containing cargo in either vapor or liquid phase. The pump motor shall be deenergized when this condition is not satisfied.
( 3 ) A liquid level sensing device shall automatically shut down the motor and sound an alarm at a predetermined low liquid level. The alarm location may be the station from which cargo handling is controlled or such other location outside the cargo area as is acceptable to the Commandant.
( 4 ) Details of the power cable, tank penetrations and pump connections shall be submitted.
( 5 ) An auxiliary means of emptying the cargo tanks shall be provided in accordance with § 38.10-10(d).
( 6 ) Means for positively disconnecting the power supply between the switchboard and the pump power panel shall be provided, i.e., disconnect links, lockable breakers, etc.
( 7 ) All materials used in the fabrication of the submerged motor cargo pumps shall be suitable for use with the liquid cargo at the design pressures and temperatures.