alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                for the periods indicated. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                March 25, 2008 |                                                                                                                       | By:   | /s/Melvin                Gagerman |
|------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|-----------------------------------|
|                                     | Melvin GagermanChief Executive Officer, ChiefFinancial Officer, Chief AccountingOfficer |

----
# C_2014052EN.01001501.xml

| 22.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 December 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège (Belgium)) — Guido Imfeld, Nathalie Garcet v État belge

(Case C-303/12) (1)

1

(Freedom of establishment - Equal treatment - Income tax - Legislation for the avoidance of double taxation - Income earned in a State other than the State of residence - Method of exemption subject to progressivity in the State of residence - Account taken, in part, of personal and family circumstances - Loss of certain tax advantages linked to the personal and family circumstances of the worker)

2014/C 52/23

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal de première instance de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Guido Imfeld, Nathalie Garcet

Applicants:

Defendant: État belge

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal de première instance de Liège — Interpretation of Article 39 EC — Provisions of agreements, and national legislation, relating to double taxation — Occupational income wholly earned and taxed in a Member State other than the Member State of residence — Account taken in part, by the Member State in which the income is earned, of personal and family circumstances — The income tax payable in the Member State of residence calculated in accordance with the method of exemption subject to progressivity — Loss of tax advantages linked to personal and family circumstances.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 49 TFEU is to be interpreted as precluding the application of the tax legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which has the effect that a couple residing in that Member State and earning income both in that Member State and in another Member State does not in fact receive a specific tax advantage, owing to the rules for offsetting it, whereas that couple would receive that tax advantage if the member of the couple earning the higher income did not earn his entire income in another Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 287, 22.9.2012

1

---
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending April 29, 2006

----

EnforcementAllfirst Bank, Baltimore, Maryland  -- issuance of an order of prohibition against Robert Ray, a former senior vice president.					-Announced, April 24, 2006 					Allfirst Bank, Baltimore, Maryland  -- issuance of an order of prohibition against David Cronin, a former executive vice president and treasurer.					-Announced, April 24, 2006 					The Bank of New York, New York, New York  -- written agreement with the New York State Banking Department and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.					-Announced, April 24, 2006 					Sella Holding Banca, S.p.A., Biella, Italy, and Sella Holding Banca, S.p.A., Miami Agency, Miami, Florida  -- written agreement with the State of Florida Office of Financial Regulation and the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.					-Announced, April 24, 2006 					

Regulations And PoliciesSound Practices for Finance Activities  -- publication for comment of revised Interagency Statement on Sound Practices Concerning Elevated Risk Complex Structured Finance Activities (Docket No. OP-1189).					-Approved, April 25, 2006 					

Testimony And StatementsEconomic Outlook  -- statement by Chairman Bernanke before the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress.					-Published, April 27, 2006 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: May 4, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6644

NEKITA ANTONIO WHITE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DUNN, Correctional Officer; TWINE, Correctional Officer; 

ROBERTS, Correctional Officer; CARLENS, Correctional 

Officer; MCQUEEN, Correctional Officer; MOJET, Correctional 

Officer; JACKSON, Correctional Officer; MASKELUNY, 

Correctional Officer; PARHAM, Correctional Officer; WHALENS, 

Correctional Officer; PIEARCE, Correctional Officer; 

RAWLINGS, Correctional Officer; EZELL, Correctional Officer; 

MOFFET, Correctional Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior 

District Judge. (1:10-cv-00349-TSE-IDD)

Submitted: July 28, 2011 Decided: August 2, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nekita Antonio White, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Nekita Antonio White seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

(2006) complaint for failure to follow the court’s earlier order 

requiring him to particularize and amend his complaint. This 

court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 

U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral 

orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. 

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). 

Because White’s complaint lacked specificity and he failed to 

remedy this fact by filing an amended complaint that articulated 

adequate facts, we conclude that the order White seeks to appeal 

is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or 

collateral order. Generally a district court’s dismissal 

without prejudice is not appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. 

Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066 (4th Cir. 

1993) (holding that a plaintiff may not appeal the dismissal of 

his complaint without prejudice unless the grounds for dismissal 

clearly indicate that no amendment in the complaint could cure 

the defects in the plaintiff’s case). Accordingly, we dismiss 

the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 167.15-27 Definitions relating to hull examinations. As used in this part— ( a ) *Drydock examination* means hauling out a vessel or placing a vessel in a drydock or slipway for an examination of all accessible parts of the vessel's underwater body and all through-hull fittings, sea chests, sea valves, sea strainers, and valves for the emergency bilge suction.
( b ) *Internal structural examination* means an examination of the vessel while afloat or in drydock and consists of a complete examination of the vessel's main strength members, including the major internal framing, the hull plating, voids, and ballast tanks, but not including cargo or fuel oil tanks.
[CGD 84-024, 52 FR 39655, Oct. 23, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 32232, Aug. 24, 1988]
§ 36.05-10 Protection of personnel—TB/ALL. ( a ) Decks, bulkheads, or other structures shall be insulated with an approved incombustible material, or other suitable means of protection shall be employed where practicable and necessary for the protection of personnel.
( b ) [Reserved]
#### § 308.515 Payment in event of loss.

All claims for losses shall be filed by the assured with the Underwriting Agent who issued the policy. Such claims must be supported by the customary documents required in connection with war risk insurance claims, together with appropriate declarations as required by Clause 9, and such further data as may now or hereafter be required by the Maritime Administrator.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          321930
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2893110
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (160000)
<INVENTORY>                                     407628
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              10590609
<PP&E>                                        15068558
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (443459)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                33056467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          9096020
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     870000
<COMMON>                                          5300
<OTHER-SE>                                    14707886
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  33056467
<SALES>                                       22647443
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              22647443
<CGS>                                          7137019
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 24199684
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (258001)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              384759
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1678989)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (38000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1640989)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1640989)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.40)




</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE>                9

<S>                                      <C>

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<CASH>                                       28,571
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          405
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             47,450
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                  0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  45,540
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       16,597
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         16,316
<LOANS>                                     121,351
<ALLOWANCE>                                   7,276
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              268,403
<DEPOSITS>                                  250,703
<SHORT-TERM>                                      0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           2,245
<LONG-TERM>                                     679
<COMMON>                                     14,976
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                        0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              268,403
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               6,565
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             2,013
<INTEREST-OTHER>                              1,185
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              9,763
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            1,845
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1,870
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         7,893
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                 1,743
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               7,111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (35)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      (35)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (35)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.02)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 6.26
<LOANS-NON>                                  15,281
<LOANS-PAST>                                      0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              5,873
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   752
<RECOVERIES>                                   (412)
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             7,276
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          7,276
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           0







</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

                                 CERTIFICATION

                Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
         of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of
                          Title 18, United States Code)

         Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of GWL&A Financial Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004
(the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:            August 16, 2004        /s/William T. McCallum
                                          ----------------------
                                          William T. McCallum
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer



Dated:            August 16, 2004        /s/Mitchell T.G. Graye
                                          ----------------------
                                          Mitchell T.G. Graye
                                          Executive Vice President and
                                          Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 28.300 Applicability and general requirements.

Each commercial fishing industry vessel which has its keel laid or is at a similar stage of construction, or which undergoes a major conversion completed on or after September 15, 1991, and that operates with more than 16 individuals on board, must comply with the requirements of this subpart in addition to the requirements of subparts A, B, and C of this part.

[USCG-2004-18884, 69 FR 58344, Sept. 30, 2004]
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURUSANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Energy Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending February 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 16, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Meetesh Patel, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

** **

Date:  April 16, 2010                                          /s/ Meetesh Patel 

                                                                                Meetesh Patel

                                                                                President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

----
§ 194.05-7 Explosives—Detail requirements. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided by this part, Division 1.1 and 1.2 (explosive) materials (as defined in 49 CFR 173.50) and blasting-caps must be carried in magazines specifically fitted for that purpose as described by subpart 194.10 of this part.
( b ) Class 1 (explosive) materials (as defined in 49 CFR 173.50) must be identified by their appropriate DOT classification.
( c ) ( 1 ) Compatibility of magazine stowage shall be in accordance with 49 CFR 176.144.
( 2 ) Magazine chests, magazine vans, and deck stowage areas shall be separated by a distance of at least 25 feet if their contents are incompatible with each other. Reduction of this distance to allow for special configurations will be permitted only if specifically approved by the Commandant.
( d ) On-deck stowage of unfused depth-charges or other unfused-case-type Class 1 (explosive) materials (as defined in 49 CFR 173.50) is authorized as follows: ( 1 ) Stowage shall be in a location reasonably protected from the full force of boarding seas.
( 2 ) Stowage shall be protected from direct exposure to the sun by overhead decks, awnings, or tarpaulins. Decks shall be constructed of incombustible materials; awnings and tarpaulins shall be fire-resistant and/or flame proof fabric.
( 3 ) Items shall be properly secured by using existing vessel structures such as bulwarks, hatch coamings, shelter deck and poop bulkheads as part boundaries and effectively closing in the items by fitting angle bar closing means secured by bolting to clips or other parts of the ship's structure. Lashing of deck stowage is permitted provided eye pads or other suitable means are fitted to secure such lashings and provided the individual items are of such a configuration as to prevent slippage of the lashings. Shoring and dunnage may be used as necessary to further facilitate the security of the stowage.
( 4 ) Stowage area shall be selected so as to provide for safe access to all internal spaces and to all parts of the deck required to be used in navigation and working of the vessel. Stowage shall not be on or under the bridge, or navigating deck, or within a distance, in a horizontal plane, of 25 feet of an operating or embarkation point of any lifeboat or raft. Reduction of this distance to allow for special configurations will be permitted only if specifically approved by the Commandant.
[CGFR 67-83, 33 FR 1151, Jan. 27, 1968, as amended by CGD 86-033, 53 FR 36027, Sept. 16, 1988; CGD 92-050, 59 FR 39966, Aug. 5, 1994; CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51051, Sept. 30, 1997]
# C_2011319EN.01003002.xml

| 29.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/30

---

Action brought on 3 August 2011 — ZZ v European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control

(Case F-80/11)

2011/C 319/65

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis. E. Marechal and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision to terminate the applicant’s contract on disciplinary grounds and for payment of a sum by way of compensation for the material and non-material damage claimed to have been suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the authority authorised to conclude the contracts of 11 October 2010 to terminate the applicant’s contract early, with two months’ notice, expiring on 11 December 2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the authority authorised to conclude the contracts of 11 October 2010 to terminate the applicant’s contract early, with two months’ notice, expiring on 11 December 2010;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs and to pay the sum of EUR 300 000 by way of compensation for the material and non-material damage suffered by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs and to pay the sum of EUR 300 000 by way of compensation for the material and non-material damage suffered by the applicant.

---
# C_2013009EN.01003502.xml

| 12.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of (Third Chamber) of 21 November 2012 –Spain v Commission

(Case T-76/11) (1)

1

(Fisheries - Measures for the conservation of living aquatic resources - Article 105 of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 - Deductions from quotas allocated for a given year on account of overfishing in previous years - Temporal application - Legal certainty - Interpretation guaranteeing compliance with primary law - Principle that penalties must have a proper legal basis - Non-retroactivity)

2013/C 9/61

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: N. Díaz Abad, abogado del Estado)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: by F. Jimeno Fernández and D. Nardi, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1004/2010 of 8 November 2010 of operating deductions from certain fishing quotas for 2010 on account of overfishing in the previous year (OJ 2010 L 291, p. 31)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 19.3.2011.

1

---