alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 85 (Thursday, May 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 24571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2175]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Nuclear Deterrence 
Skills will meet in closed session on May 14-15, 2007; at the Strategic 
Analysis Inc., 3601 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on Scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these 
meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will: Assess all aspects 
of nuclear deterrent skills as well as the progress Department of 
Energy (DoE) has made since the publication of the Chiles Commission 
report.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been 
determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, the 
meetings will be closed to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LCDR Clifton Phillips, USN, Defense 
Science Board, 3140 Defense Pentagon, Room 3C553, Washington, DC 20301-
3140, via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#debdb2b7b8aab1b0f0aeb6b7b2b2b7aead9eb1adbaf0b3b7b2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4427282d22302b2a6a342c2d28282d3437042b37206a292d28">[email protected]</span></a>, or via phone at (703) 
571-0083.

    Dated: April 27, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-2175 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 197.338 Compressed gas cylinders. Each compressed gas cylinder must— ( a ) Be stored in a ventilated area;
( b ) Be protected from excessive heat;
( c ) Be prevented from falling;
( d ) Be tested after any repair, modification, or alteration to the pressure boundaries as set forth in § 197.462; and
( e ) Meet the requirements of— ( 1 ) Part 54 of this chapter; or
( 2 ) 49 CFR 173.34 and 49 CFR part 178, subpart C.
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*Fletcher Brockway v. Horatio Whitney, *Commissioner, etc.*

Order affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements against relator. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
NUMBER 13-19-00372-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE STATE AUTOMOBILE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Perkes

Per Curiam Order

Relator State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus and an “Emergency Motion to Stay Discovery Order” in the above cause on 

August 1, 2019. Through this original proceeding, relator seeks to compel the trial court 

to vacate its July 29, 2019 discovery order which, inter alia, compels relator to provide 

corporate witnesses for deposition and to respond to interrogatories and requests for 

production. Through its emergency motion to stay, relator seeks to stay the July 29, 2019 

discovery order pending resolution of this original proceeding. 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the emergency motion to stay, 

is of the opinion that the motion should be granted in part and denied in part as stated 
2

herein. The emergency motion is GRANTED in part insofar as the provisions of the July 

29, 2019 order authorizing and ordering discovery are ordered STAYED pending further 

order of this Court, or until the case is finally decided. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b) 

(“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective until the case 

is finally decided.”). The emergency motion is DENIED in part as to the other paragraphs 

of the July 29, 2019 order. Specifically, relator shall comply with: (1) paragraph 2 of the 

order, requiring relator, its attorneys, agents, employees, contractors, or others acting on 

its behalf, to cease and desist from further efforts to implement or utilize the information 

from the poll or any similar poll; (2) paragraph 8 of the order, requiring relator to refrain 

from destroying, concealing, deleting, erasing or altering any documents (in paper or 

electronic form) relating or pertaining to the poll, its authorization, approval, preparation, 

or implementation; and (3) paragraph 9 of the order requiring relator to provide a copy of 

the order to any person, firm or entity involved in any way in the authorization, approval, 

preparation, or implementation of the poll, with instructions to not destroy, conceal, delete, 

erase, or alter any documents (in paper or electronic form) relating or pertaining to the 

poll, its authorization, approval, preparation, or implementation.

The Court requests that the real parties in interest, Wayne Pozzi and Kelly Pozzi, 

or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response 

to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date 

of this order. See id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed

this 2nd day of August, 2019.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Advisory Neurological Disorders and Stroke Council, May 24, 2007, 8 a.m. to May 24, 2007, 10 a.m., National Institutes of Health, Building 31, 31 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 1, 2007, FR: 07-2128; 72.                

The Clinical Trials Subcommittee meeting scheduled for May 24, 2007, open and closed sessions have changed to closed from 8-8:45 a.m. and open from 8:45-10 a.m. The meeting is partially closed to the public. 

Dated: May 8, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2431  Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### George Clarke *v.*Ira Davenport, *Comptroller, etc.*

Injunction granted in the four cases, only, which have not been tried, on giving security. Order to be settled by

Learned, P. J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THERMO SENTRON INC.'S
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 1,2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                                 10,805
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          24,927
<ALLOWANCES>                                            1,615
<INVENTORY>                                            16,189
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       56,077
<PP&E>                                                  7,107
<DEPRECIATION>                                          3,781
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        136,002
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  40,884
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                   99
<OTHER-SE>                                             93,983
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          136,002
<SALES>                                               107,786
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      107,786
<CGS>                                                  64,790
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          64,790
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        3,392
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          572
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      1,136
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        10,507
<INCOME-TAX>                                            4,134
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     6,373
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                            6,373
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.67


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.170-21 Operation and maintenance instructions. ( a ) Each release mechanism must have operation and maintenance instructions that— ( 1 ) Follows the general format and content specified in IMO MSC.1 Circ. 1205 (incorporated by reference, see § 160.170-5 of this subpart); and
( 2 ) Includes a checklist for use in monthly, external inspections of the release mechanism.
( b ) The release mechanism manufacturer must make the manual required by paragraph (a) of this section available in English to purchasers of a release mechanism approved by the Coast Guard.
( c ) The operation and maintenance instructions required by paragraph (a) of this section may be combined with similar material for survival craft and rescue boats, and their launching systems.
#### Abram Vandenburgh, *Respondent, v.*Lucy J. Sinclairs, *Appellant*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Mem. by

Learned, P. J.
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of FFD Financial Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert R. Gerber, the Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Robert R. Gerber
 Robert R. Gerber


Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer


September 28, 2011
# C_2013178EN.01000901.xml

| 22.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/9

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2013 — Morelli v OHIM — Associazone nazionale circolo del popolo della libertà et Brambilla (PARTITO DELLA LIBERTA’)

(Case T-321/11 and 322/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for a Community word mark PARTITO DELLA LIBERTA’ and the Community figurative mark Partito della Libertà - Name of the earlier national domain name ‘partitodellaliberta.it’ - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Failure to demonstrate the use of the earlier domain name ‘partitodellaliberta.it’ in the course of trade)

2013/C 178/15

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Raffaello Morelli (Rome, Italy) (represented by: G. Brenelli, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, Agent)

Defendant:

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Associazone nazionale circolo del popolo della libertà (Milan, Italy) (Case T-321/11); and Michela Vittoria Brambilla (Milan) (Case T-322/11) (represented by: P. Tarchini, G. Sena and C.M. Furlani, lawyers)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Actions brought against the decisions of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 March 2011 (Cases R 1303/2010-1 and R 1304/2010-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Raffaello Morelli, and, respectively, l’Associazione nazionale circolo del popolo della libertà and Mrs Michela Vittoria Brambilla.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Joins Cases T-321/11 and T-322/11 for the purposes of the judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Joins Cases T-321/11 and T-322/11 for the purposes of the judgment;

| 2. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the actions;

| 3. | Orders Mr Raffaello Morelli to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Mr Raffaello Morelli to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.

1

---
NEW YORK SUPERIOR COURT.

#### Humphreys agt. Humphreys.

*Special*Term,

June, 1874.

*Alimony and counsel fees not allowed in an action fin' limited divorce.*

Alimony and counsel fee will not be allowed to the plaintiff in an action for a limited divorce and separation on the ground of alleged desertion and abandonment, by the defendant, where the plaintiff fails to establish a marriage contract with the defendant.

A cohabitation existing between the parties during some four years, which from the evidence was considered to be illicit in its character and meretricious from the beginning, was no foundation upon which to rest her application.

Van Vorst, *J.*

This is an application for alimony and counsel fee in an action for a limited divorce and separation between the parties, on the ground of the alleged desertion and abandonment of the plaintiff by the defendant.

It is not claimed by the plaintiff that there was a formal marriage, with ceremony, consummated between the parties, but that on the 31st October, 1854, the parties entered into a contract with each other, and interchanged mutual vows and promises to be to each other as husband and wife, and that they thereafter cohabited together as such. The evidence wholly fails to satisfy me that there was any agreement or intention between the parties at the time mentioned, or at any other time, to become husband and wife, or that the cohabitation between them, while it lasted, was the result of any such engagement or intention.

I am convinced that the intercourse between the parties, in its inception, was illicit, and its character has never changed *141into a matrimonial engagement or condition, and is no evidence thereof. Whatever cohabitation existed between the parties from its beginning was meretricious,

The evidence fails to satisfy me that the defendant ever treated or held out the plaintiff as his wife, or that he lived or cohabited with her as such.

In 1860 the defendant was married to Kate E. Condon, in the city of New York. This marriage, which had been preceded by a long courtship between the parties, was published at the time it took place, and the defendant has lived with his lawfully married wife ever since. The fact of this marriage was well known to a large circle of acquaintances at the time of its consummation, and has ever since continued to be known and acknowledged.

There can be no presumption of a crime in the marriage of parties according to the usual forms in a public manner, or that either party was disqualified by a previous secret marriage, from entering into such engagement.

There is good reason to believe, from the evidence, that the plaintiff knew of the defendant’s marriage about the time it took place or shortly afterward.

The claim made by the plaintiff, of a prior marriage with the defendant, is not established, and rests upon no foundation to justify her application for alimony and counsel fee, and the same is denied. :
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 8
Federal Reserve Bank of: St. Louis

## Filings received during the week ending August 26, 2006

|Filer                 | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                               | End of Comment Period                             
|--------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|DEARMIN BANCORP, INC. | CIC           | Notice by Dearmin Investment Holdings Business, L.P., Odon, Indiana, to gain control of Dearmin Bancorp, Inc., Odon, Indiana. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:09/08/2006
|Newspaper:            | Not available
|Federal Register:     | 09/08/2006   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Forth Quarter of 2006 (October 1, 2006 - December 31, 2006)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 182.465 Ventilation of spaces containing diesel machinery. ( a ) A space containing diesel machinery must be fitted with adequate means such as dripproof ventilators, ducts, or louvers, to provide sufficient air for proper operation of main engines and auxiliary engines.
( b ) Air-cooled propulsion and auxiliary diesel engines installed below deck, as permitted by § 182.420, must be fitted with air supply ducts or piping from the weather deck. The ducts or piping must be so arranged and supported to be capable of safely sustaining stresses induced by weight and engine vibration and to minimize transfer of vibration to the supporting structure. Prior to installation of ventilation system for such engines, plans or sketches showing machinery arrangement including air supplies, exhaust stack, method of attachment of ventilation ducts to the engine, location of spark arresting mufflers and capacity of ventilation blowers must be submitted to the cognizant OCMI for approval.
( c ) A space containing diesel machinery must be fitted with at least two ducts to furnish natural or powered supply and exhaust ventilation. The total inlet area and the total outlet area of each ventilation duct may not be less than one square inch for each foot of beam of the vessel. These minimum areas must be increased as necessary when the ducts are considered as part of the air supply to the engines.
( d ) A duct must be of rigid permanent construction, which does not allow any appreciable vapor flow except through normal openings, and made of the same material as the hull or of noncombustible material. The duct must lead as directly as possible from its intake opening to its terminus and be securely fastened and supported.
( e ) A supply duct must be provided with a cowl or scoop having a free area not less than twice the required duct area. When the cowl or scoop is screened, the mouth area must be increased to compensate for the area of the screen wire. A cowl or scoop must be kept open at all times except when the weather is such as to endanger the vessel if the openings are not temporarily closed.
( f ) Dampers may not be fitted in a supply duct.
( g ) A duct opening may not be located where the natural flow of air is unduly obstructed, adjacent to possible sources of vapor ignition, or where exhaust air may be taken into a supply duct.
( h ) provision must be made for closing all supply duct cowls or scoops and exhaust duct discharge openings for a space protected by a fixed gas extinguishing system. All closure devices must be readily available and mounted in the vicinity of the vent.
( i ) A vessel of not more than 19.8 meters (65 feet) in length, carrying not more than 12 passengers, with ventilation installations in accordance with ABYC H-32 (incorporated by reference; see 46 CFR 175.600) will be considered as meeting the requirements of this section.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 986, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65209, Oct. 31, 2008]