alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012287EN.01003101.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/31

---

Order of the General Court of 17 July 2012 — L’Oréal v OHIM — United Global Media Group (MyBeauty TV)

(Case T-240/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Costs recoverable before OHIM - Costs of being represented by an employee - Article 85(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law)

2012/C 287/57

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: L’Oréal (Paris, France) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and S. Abel, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: United Global Media Group, Inc. (El Segundo, California, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 February 2011 (Case R 898/2010-1) concerning opposition proceedings between United Global Media Group, Inc. and L’Oréal.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | L’Oréal SA is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

L’Oréal SA is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 204, 9.7.2011.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Central Visual Processing Study Section, June 19, 2007, 8 a.m. to June 20, 2007, 5 p.m. DoubleTree Hotel, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 4, 2007, 72 FR 25324-25325.                

The meeting will be held one day only on June 29, 2007. The meeting time and location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: May 8, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2422 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Written Description of Non-employee Director Compensation



  
 Exhibit 10.16

  
 ST. JOHN KNITS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED

  
 WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION 
 PURSUANT TO 
 ITEM 601(b)(10)(iii)(A) OF REGULATION S-K 
  
 Each
director who does not hold a salaried position with St. John Knits International, Incorporated or with Vestar Capital Partners, absent an agreement to the contrary, shall receive an annual retainer of $40,000, in addition to an attendance fee of
$2,500 for each meeting of the Board of Directors attended personally and $500 for each meeting of the Board and committee of the Board attended telephonically. Such directors may also be granted stock options at the discretion of the Board.
Directors shall be reimbursed for travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them that are incidental to attending meetings.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2431 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend and increase the 

deduction for certain expenses of elementary and secondary school teachers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2009 

Ms. KOSMAS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

and increase the deduction for certain expenses of elementary and secondary school teachers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘America’s Teachers 

5 Tax Relief Act’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2431 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF DEDUCTION FOR CERTAIN EX2 PENSES OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY 

3 SCHOOL TEACHERS. 

4 (a) EXTENSION.—Subparagraph (D) of section 

5 62(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘or 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘2009, or 2010’’. 

7 (b) INCREASE.—Subparagraph (D) of section 

8 62(a)(2) of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘$250’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘$500’’. 

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

12 December 31, 2009. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TASHANDA BRODY

Case No. 2:15-cv-11964 

Plaintiff, Hon. Gershwin A. Drain

v

Magistrate: Stephanie Dawkins Davis

ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND

PROPERTY INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendant.

RICHARD A. LEVITT (P28073)

ANN-MARIE E. EARLS (P78308)

MELAMED, DAILEY, LEVITT &

MILANOWSKI, PC

Attorneys for Plaintiff

26611 Woodward Avenue

Huntington Woods, Michigan 48070

(248) 591-5000

ricklevitt@mdlm-pc.com

SHELLY LEE GRIFFIN (P49488)

JOSEPH C. JOHNSON (P76983)

PATRICK, JOHNSON & MOTT, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendant

27777 Franklin Road, Suite 1400

Southfield, Michigan 48034

(248) 356-8590

sgriffin@pjmpc.com

CONSENT ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

The parties having settled their dispute without an adjudication on the merits, and this matter

having come before the Court based on the stipulation of the parties, through their respective

counsel, as evidenced by their signatures below, and the Court being otherwise advised in the

premises:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned case is DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE and without costs, interest, expenses or attorneys’ fees to either of the parties.

This Order resolves the last pending claim and closes the case.

/s/Gershwin A Drain 

HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:15-cv-11964-GAD-SDD ECF No. 41, PageID.705 Filed 11/08/16 Page 1 of 2
The undersigned consent to entry of 

the above order. Notice of entry waived.

s/ with consent of Rick Levitt

MELAMED, DAILEY, LEVITT &

MILANOWSKI, PC

Attorneys for Plaintiff

26611 Woodward Avenue

Huntington Woods, Michigan 48070

(248) 591-5000

ricklevitt@mdlm-pc.com

P28073

s/ Shelly Lee Griffin

PATRICK, JOHNSON & MOTT, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendant

27777 Franklin Road, Suite 1400

Southfield, Michigan 48034

(248) 356-8590

sgriffin@pjmpc.com

P49488

Case 2:15-cv-11964-GAD-SDD ECF No. 41, PageID.706 Filed 11/08/16 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2512 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2512

     To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to prohibit the 
consideration in the House of Representatives or the Senate of measures 
  that appropriate funds for earmarks to private, for-profit entities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 2009

     Mr. Flake (for himself, Mr. Kind, Mr. Campbell, Mr. Walz, Mr. 
    Hensarling, Mr. Cooper, Mr. Kirk, and Mr. Smith of Washington) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to 
      be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to prohibit the 
consideration in the House of Representatives or the Senate of measures 
  that appropriate funds for earmarks to private, for-profit entities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EARMARK POINT OF ORDER.

    Section 312 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Earmark Point of Order.--(1) It shall not be in order in the 
House of Representatives or the Senate to consider any bill or joint 
resolution, or amendment thereto or conference report thereon, if that 
measure or any accompanying report or joint explanatory statement of 
managers contains any earmark for which the intended recipient is a 
private, for-profit entity.
    ``(2) As used in this subsection, the term `earmark' has the 
meaning given to the term `congressional earmark' in clause 9 of rule 
XXI of the Rules of the House of Representatives.''.

SEC. 2. SUPER MAJORITY POINT OF ORDER IN THE SENATE.

    Subsections (c)(1) and (d)(2) of section 904 of the Congressional 
Budget Act of 1974 are amended by inserting ``312(g),'' after 
``310(d)(2),''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

LEROY SPANN,

Appellant

v.

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF 

PROBATION AND PAROLE AND 

PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,

Appellees

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 71 MAP 2016

Appeal from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court at No. 728 MD 

2012 dated June 9, 2016

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: August 16, 2017

AND NOW, this 16th day of August, 2017, the Commonwealth Court’s ruling 

dated June 9, 2016 is affirmed in part and reversed in part:

(1) that portion of the ruling granting the Suggestion of Mootness filed by the 

Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole is hereby AFFIRMED; and

(2) that portion of the ruling granting the Preliminary Objections filed by the 

Pennsylvania State Police and denying the Motion for Summary Judgment 

filed by Appellant Leroy Spann is hereby REVERSED. See 

Commonwealth v. Muniz, ___ A.3d ___, 47 MAP 2016 (Pa. July 19,

2017). 

The case is hereby remanded to the Commonwealth Court for the entry of an 

appropriate order granting mandamus relief.

Chief Justice Saylor and Justice Mundy file concurring statements.
```

[111th Congress Public Law 228]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

Public Law 111-228
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To provide adequate commitment authority for fiscal year 2010 for 
 guaranteed loans that are obligations of the General and Special Risk 
         Insurance Funds of the Department of Housing and Urban 
          Development. <<NOTE: Aug. 11, 2010 -  [H.R. 5872]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: General and 
Special Risk Insurance Funds Availability Act of 2010.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``General and Special Risk Insurance 
Funds Availability Act of 2010''.
SEC. 2. ADEQUATE COMMITMENT AUTHORITY.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for fiscal year 2010 the 
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development may enter into commitments to 
guarantee loans, as authorized by sections 238 and 519 of the National 
Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715z-3 and 1735c), in an amount not exceeding 
$20,000,000,000 in total loan principal, any part of which is to be 
guaranteed.
SEC. 3. BUDGETARY EFFECTS.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying with 
the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that such 
statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

    Approved August 11, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5872:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            July 28, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 4, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 8.1

                                  SUBSIDIARIES


XEIKON AMERICA, Inc.
1360 N. Wood Dale Road
Wood Dale, IL 60191 - United States
Tel.: +1 800 898 5713
Fax: +1 630 616 9535

XEIKON JAPAN Ltd.
8-1, Higashiyama 3-Chome
Meguro-ku
Tokyo 153-0043 - Japan
Tel.: +81 3 5704 8730
Fax: +81 3 5704 8703

XEIKON DEUTSCHLAND GmbH.
Hammfelddamm 6
41460 Neuss - Germany
Tel.: +49 21 31 16 3800
Fax: +49 21 31 16 3810

XEIKON UK Ltd.
First Point - Buckingham Gate
London Gatwick Airport
West Sussex RH6 0NT - Great Britain
Tel.: +44 1293 89 7212
Fax: +44 1293 89 7312

XEIKON ASIA PACIFIC
Representative Office for Asia Pacific
Suite 2105 - 2107 Level 21 - Plaza Pengkalan
Jalan Ipoh - 51200 Kuala Lumpur - Malaysia
Tel.: +60 3 4045 4200
Fax: +60 3 4045 4300

XEIKON SOUTH & CENTRAL AMERICA
Representative Office for South & Central America
7370 NW 36TH ST - Suite 210G
Miami, Florida 33166-6733 - USA
Tel.: +1 305 463 7133
Fax: +1 305 463 7134

XEIKON FRANCE S.A.
Representative Office (Paris)
20 rue Dieumegard
93406 Saint Ouen - France
Tel.: +33 1 49 45 5140
Fax: +33 1 49 45 5983

XEIKON FRANCE S.A.
BP 257
28 Rue E. Thierry Mieg


                                       56


<PAGE>   2


90005 Belfort - France
Tel.: +33 3 84 54 5000
Fax: +33 3 84 54 5218

World Headquarters:
XEIKON N.V.
Vredebaan 72
2640 Mortsel - Belgium
Tel.: +32 (0)3 443 13 11
Fax: +32 (0)3 443 13 09


http://www.xeikon.com
e-mail: info@xeikon.com






                                       57
# C_2013063EN.01001601.xml

| 2.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/16

---

Order of the President of the Court of 4 December 2012 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — J. Sebastian Guevara Kamm v TAM Airlines S.A./TAM Linhas Aereas S.A.

(Case C-316/12) (1)

1

2013/C 63/30

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 295, 29.9.2012.

1

---
§ 183.370 General grounding requirements. ( a ) A vessel's hull must not carry current as a conductor except for the following systems: ( 1 ) Impressed current cathodic protection systems; or
( 2 ) Battery systems for engine starting.
( b ) Receptacle outlets and attachment plugs for portable lamps, tools, and similar apparatus operating at 100 volts or more, must have a grounding pole and a grounding conductor in the portable cord.
( c ) Each nonmetallic mast and top mast must have a lightning ground conductor.
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.105-2 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this subpart with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material is available for inspection at the U.S. Coast Guard, Office of Design and Engineering Standards (CG-ENG), 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, and is available from the sources listed below. It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html*.
( b ) International Maritime Organization (IMO) Publishing, 4 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR, United Kingdom, +44 (0)20 7735 7611, *http://www.imo.org*. ( 1 ) 2010 FTP Code, International Code for Application of Fire Test Procedures, 2010 (Resolution MSC.307(88)), 2012 Edition (“FTP Code”), IBR approved for § 164.105-3(a).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
# RECEIVED FEB- 32016 HEARING DOCKET
ATTORNEYS AT LAW 700TwELVE0AKSCENTERDRIVE,SU!TE700, WAYZATA,MN 55391 TELEPHONE: 952/449-8817 FACSIMILE: 952/449-0614
RICHARD BAR BRENDAN COLLINS STEVEN JOliN" FELLMAN EDWARD D. GREENBERG KATHARINEfOSTERMEYER DAVID K. MONROE TROYA. ROLF DAVIDP.STREET KEITII G. SWIRSKY THOMAS W. WILCOX CHRISTOPHER B. YOUNGER SVETLANAV. LYUBCHENKO

February 2, 2016 

### VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Avenue, S.W. Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Docket Clerk, AGC 430 

### RE: Jennifer Lauren, Case No. 2014S0275046 Dear Sir/Ma'am: WASIHNGTON, DC 0FF1CE: 1055 THOMAS JEFFERSONSTREET,NW, SUITE 500 WASHINGTON, DC 20007-4492 (n2o2/342-s2oo (F)202/342-s2t9

WRITER'S DIRECfE-MAIL ADDRESS trolf@gk:glaw_com WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER 952-449-8817

## ~DfY13: 

# dO IC:S

I represent Jennifer Lauren in the above-referenced matter, and am in possession ofa copy ofthe Final Notice ofProposed Civil Penalty dated as ofJanuary 19, 2016. On behalfof my client, Jennifer Lauren, we hereby request a hearing onthis matter.

cc: Brandau Goldberg Attorney Sincerely,

Enforcement Division, Southern Team P.O. Box 20636 Atlanta, GA 30320 

## @INTERLAW. An InternationalAssociation of IndependentLaw Firms in Major World Centers
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CURTIS LAMONT WOODS,

Petitioner, 

v.

CARMEN PALMER,

Respondent. 

 /

Case Number: 2:15-CV-10095

HONORABLE PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER CONSTRUING PETITIONER’S “REBUTTAL TO ORDER AND

OPINION” AS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND DENYING MOTION

On January 30, 2015, the Court summarily dismissed Curtis Lamont Woods’

habeas corpus petition because he failed to state a claim under which habeas relief may be

granted. Woods has now filed a “Rebuttal to Opinion and Order,” which the Court

construes as a Motion for Reconsideration. 

Motions for rehearing or reconsideration may be granted when the moving party

shows (1) a “palpable defect,” (2) by which the court and the parties were misled, and (3)

the correction of which will result in a different disposition of the case. E.D. Mich. L.R.

7.1(h)(3). A “palpable defect” is a “defect which is obvious, clear, unmistakable,

manifest or plain.” Olson v. The Home Depot, 321 F. Supp. 2d 872, 874 (E.D. Mich.

2004).

Woods’ motion expresses disagreement with the Court’s decision, but fails to offer

any grounds for a finding that the Court’s decision was the result of a palpable defect. A

2:15-cv-10095-PDB-MJH Doc # 8 Filed 02/25/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 61
motion that simply reasserts arguments already denied by the Court fails to allege

sufficient grounds upon which to grant reconsideration. L.R. 7.1(h)(3); see also Graham

ex rel. Estate of Graham v. County of Washtenaw, 358 F.3d 377, 385 (6th Cir. 2004)

(affirming district court’s denial of motion for reconsideration where motion “merely

raised arguments that were already ruled upon”). The Court concludes that Woods has

not met his burden of showing a palpable defect by which the Court has been misled or

his burden of showing that a different disposition would result from the correction

thereof. 

Accordingly, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration [dkt. #

7]. 

SO ORDERED. 

s/Paul D. Borman 

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: February 25, 2015

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each

attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on February

25, 2015.

s/Deborah Tofil 

Case Manager

2

2:15-cv-10095-PDB-MJH Doc # 8 Filed 02/25/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 62
§ 176.802 Hull. ( a ) At each initial and subsequent inspection for certification of a vessel, the owner or managing operator shall be prepared to conduct tests and have the vessel ready for inspections of the hull structure and its appurtenances, including the following: ( 1 ) Inspection of all accessible parts of the exterior and interior of the hull, the watertight bulkheads, and weather decks;
( 2 ) Inspection and operation of all watertight closures in the hull, decks, and bulkheads including through hull fittings and sea valves;
( 3 ) Inspection of the condition of the superstructure, masts, and similar arrangements constructed on the hull, and on a sailing vessel all spars, standing rigging, running rigging, blocks, fittings, and sails;
( 4 ) Inspection of all railings and bulwarks and their attachment to the hull structure;
( 5 ) Inspection to ensure that guards or rails are provided in dangerous places;
( 6 ) Inspection and operation of all weathertight closures above the weather deck and the provisions for drainage of sea water from the exposed decks; and
( 7 ) Inspection of all interior spaces to ensure that they are adequately ventilated and drained, and that means of escape are adequate and properly maintained.
( b ) The vessel must be afloat for at least a portion of the inspection as required by the marine inspector.
( c ) When required by the marine inspector, a portion of the inspection must be conducted while the vessel is underway so that the hull and internal structure can be observed.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 953, Jan. 10, 1996; 61 FR 20557, May 7, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51356, Sept. 30, 1997]
#### § 310.11 Cadet uniforms.

Cadet uniforms shall be supplied at the school in accordance with the uniform regulations of the School. Those regulations shall prescribe a distinctive insignia or device approved by the Maritime Administrator.
#### § 196.43-5 Availability.

On all vessels to which this subpart applies there must be readily available to the deck officer of the watch a placard containing instructions for the use of the lifesaving signals set forth in regulation 16, chapter V, of the International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea, 1974. These signals must be used by vessels or persons in distress when communicating with lifesaving stations and maritime rescue units.