alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 195.01-3 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) Certain materials are incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a). To enforce any edition other than the one listed in paragraph (b) of this section, notice of the change must be published in the Federal Register and the material made available to the public. All approved material is on file at the Office of the Federal Register, Washington, DC 20408, and at Coast Guard Headquarters. Contact Commandant (CG-ENG), Attn: Office of Design and Engineering Systems, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509. The material is also available from the source indicated in paragraph (b).
( b ) The material approved for incorporation by reference in this part, and the sections affected is:
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. ASTM F 1014-92, Standard Specification for Flashlights on Vessels—195.35-5
[CGD 82-042, 53 FR 17706, May 18, 1988, as amended by CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50735, Sept. 27, 1996; CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51051, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-1999-5151, 64 FR 67187, Dec. 1, 1999; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49241, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59789, Oct. 1, 2012; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60165, Sept. 30, 2013]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements for the nine months ended  September 30, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                62,425
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        173,664
<ALLOWANCES>                                          22,358
<INVENTORY>                                          118,519
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     335,250
<PP&E>                                                17,279
<DEPRECIATION>                                         6,923
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       345,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                191,856
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                               6,600
<OTHER-SE>                                            90,650
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         345,606
<SALES>                                              490,418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     490,418
<CGS>                                                326,703
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        103,908
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      11,799
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     3,907
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       55,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                             680
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   55,220
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                          55,220
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0.01



</TABLE>
# C_2014009EN.01001502.xml

| 11.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2013 — Wam Industriale SpA v European Commission

(Case C-560/12 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - State aid - Establishing a company in certain third countries - Soft loans - Decision declaring aid partly incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery - Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of the original decision concerning the same proceedings - Enforcement of a judgment of the General Court)

2014/C 9/23

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Wam Industriale SpA (represented by: E. Giliani and R. Bertoni, avvocati)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and D. Grespan, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 September 2012 in Case T-303/10 Wam Industriale v Commission, in which the General Court rejected an application for the annulment of Commission Decision 2011/134/EU of 24 March 2010 concerning State aid implemented by Italy for Wam SpA (OJ 2011 L 57, p. 29) — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Principle of proportionality — Principle of sound administration — Reasonable time-limit

Wam Industriale

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Wam Industriale SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Wam Industriale SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 2.3.2013.

1

---
§ 38.10-5 Filling and discharge pipes—TB/ALL. ( a ) Filling and discharge connections shall be provided with the manually operated valve required by § 38.10-1(i) and with a positive acting remote controlled quick-closing valve. The remote controlled quick-closing valve shall satisfy the requirements of § 38.10-1(j).
( b ) For pressure vessel type tanks the remote controlled quick-closing valves shall be located on the inside of the tank or on the outside where the piping enters the tank. For pressure vessel type tanks operating at low pressure and with service temperature near the cargo atmospheric boiling point, the Commandant may approve individual installations where these valves are located at the loading and discharge headers.
( c ) For nonpressure vessel type tanks the remote controlled quick-closing valves may be located at the loading and discharge headers.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Inter-American Foundation Board Meeting

# Time and Date:

January 22, 2007, 9:15 a.m.-12:30 p.m. 

# Place:

901 N. Stuart Street, Tenth Floor, Arlington, Virginia 22203. 

# Status:

Open session. 

# Matters to be Considered:

 
      - Approval of the Minutes of the May 22, 2006, Meeting of the Board of Directors.
      - President's Report.
      - Program Update.
      - Operations Update.
      - External Affairs.
      - Congressional Affairs.
      - Board site visit to IAF grantees.

# Portions to be Open to the Public: 

      - All.

# Portions to be Closed to the Public: 

      - None.

# Contact Person For More Information: 

      - Jennifer R. Hodges, General Counsel—(703) 306-4320.

Dated: January 9, 2007. 

Jennifer R. Hodges, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 07-189 Filed 1-12-07; 3 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7025-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, Case No.

Hon.

v

ROBERT D. MANOR, 

Defendant.

 /

COMPLAINT

Plaintiff, the United States of America, by and through its undersigned 

counsel alleges as follows:

Nature Of Action

1. This is a civil action under Section 3001(a)(1) of the Federal Debt 

Collection Act to recover a debt due the United States. 

Jurisdiction And Venue

2. This court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1345.

3. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) because 

the defendant resides in this district and the claim arose in this district.

2:15-cv-11469-MAG-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 04/23/15 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 1
2

Defendant

4. Robert D. Manor (“Manor”) is an individual person and a resident of 

the State of Michigan, whose last known address is 1200 Mill Creek Road, Flint, MI 

48532.

The Debt – Account No. 2011A70892

5. On or about May 8, 2007 the defendant executed a promissory note to 

secure a Direct Consolidation loan from the United States Department of Education. 

A copy of the promissory note is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit A and 

incorporated herein as if fully set forth. 

6. The debt owed to the United States of America is as follows:

A. Current principal $130,452.33

B. Current capitalized interest $ 66,403.13

C. Accrued interest since $ 3,545.64

December 15, 2014

Total owed $200,401.10

The Certificate of Indebtedness is attached hereto and marked as 

Exhibit B. The principal balance and interest balance shown on the Certificate of 

Indebtedness is correct as of the date of the Certificate of Indebtedness after 

application of all prior payments, credits and offsets. Prejudgment interest 

continues to accrue at the rate of $28.41 per day. 

2:15-cv-11469-MAG-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 04/23/15 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 2
3

Failure to Pay

8. Demand has been made upon the defendant for payment of the 

indebtedness, and the defendant has neglected and refused to pay the same. 

WHEREFORE, the United States respectfully requests that the Court enter 

judgment in its favor and against Robert D. Manor, in the amount of $200,401.10 

plus prejudgment interest through the date of judgment, and post-judgment interest 

at the rate set forth in 28 U.S.C.§ 1961; and such other and further relief as is deemed 

just and reasonable. 

BARBARA L. McQUADE

United States Attorney

By: s/JACQUELINE M. HOTZ

Assistant United States Attorney

211 W. Fort, Ste 2001

Detroit, MI 48226

Tel. No. 313-226-9108

Email: Jackie.Hotz@usdoj.gov

Dated: April 23, 2015 Mich Bar No. P35219

2:15-cv-11469-MAG-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 04/23/15 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 3
Presidential Documents

27239 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 92 

Monday, May 14, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8141 of May 9, 2007 

Military Spouse Day, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

America’s military spouses inspire our Nation with their sense of duty 

and deep devotion to our country. On Military Spouse Day, we honor 

the husbands and wives of those who wear the uniform of the Armed 

Forces of the United States. 

The husbands and wives of our service members have made significant 

sacrifices for freedom’s cause, and they are an integral part of the success 

of our Armed Forces. Spouses may endure long periods of separation and 

frequent relocations, and they often set aside their own personal and professional ambitions for the benefit of their family and the Nation. Despite 

tremendous personal challenges, military spouses maintain everyday life 

for their families here at home, while sending love, prayers, encouraging 

words, and care packages to their loved ones stationed around the globe. 

On behalf of a grateful Nation, we salute our Nation’s military spouses. 

For ways to support our troops, their spouses, and their families, visit 

americasupportsyou.mil. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 11, 2007, as Military 

Spouse Day. I call upon the people of the United States to observe this 

day with appropriate ceremonies and activities and by expressing their 

gratitude to the husbands and wives of those serving in the United States 

Armed Forces. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with PRESDOC D0
27240 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ninth day of 

May, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 07–2398 

Filed 5–11–07; 9:16 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with PRESDOC D0GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
§ 171.119 Openings below the weather deck in the side of a vessel less than 100 gross tons. ( a ) If a vessel operates on exposed or partially protected waters, an opening port light is not permitted below the weather deck unless— ( 1 ) The sill is at least 30 inches (76.2 centimeters) above the deepest subdivision load line; and
( 2 ) It has an inside, hinged dead cover.
( b ) Except for engine exhausts, each inlet or discharge pipe that penetrates the hull below a line drawn parallel to and at least 6 inches (15.2 centimeters) above the deepest subdivision load line must have means to prevent water from entering the vessel if the pipe fractures or otherwise fails.
( c ) A positive action valve or cock that is located as close as possible to the hull is an acceptable means for complying with paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) If an inlet or discharge pipe is inaccessible, the means for complying with paragraph (b) of this section must be a shut-off valve that is— ( 1 ) Operable from the weather deck or other accessible location above the bulkhead deck; and
( 2 ) Labeled at the operating point for identity and direction of closing.
( e ) Any connecting device or valve in a hull penetration must not be cast iron.
( f ) Each plug cock in an inlet or discharge pipe must have a means, other than a cotter pin, to prevent its loosening or removal from the body.
[CGD 85-080, 62 FR 51353, Sept. 30, 1997]
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00459-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.K., A CHILD §

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 211th District Court

of Denton County (15-02179-211)

April 23, 2020

Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By __/s/ Elizabeth Kerr_________________

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr
#### METROPOLITAN SECURITIES CORPORATION v. JACOB BELSKY (IMPLEADED, ETC.).

Submitted January 25, 1929

Decided October 14, 1929.

Before Gummeee, Chibe Justice, and Justices Paeicee and Bodine.

For the plaintiff, *Harold Simandl.*

For the defendant, *John W. Ochford.*

*875Pee Curiam.

The question in the ease, which is one almost altogether of fact, is whether proper notice was given to the defendant as the endorser on a promissory note. There was some dispute at the trial with respect to the presentment of the note for payment but that point is now waived and the only question now pressed relates to the matter of notice.

Belsky did not add his address to his endorsement and therefore, in the ordinary course of events, the notice intended for him and made out by the notary of the Plainfield bank where the note was made payable, was sent by that bank to a bank in Bayonne, and the latter bank sent out the notice to the plaintiff who was then holder.

No claim is made that Belsky ever received this notice; but the plaintiff’s case rested on the claim that one Mischkin, president of the plaintiff, learned of the non-payment of the note on the day after it was presented and immediately sent an independent notice to Belsky at his proper address in Weehawken. A copy of the alleged notice as printed in the case contains the correct address.

It is not seriously suggested that this notice, if sent, was sent out too late.

In fact, if so sent, it would normally have reached Belsky a day sooner than the notice made out by the notary. The presentment was properly made on May 31st and the notary sent his notices to the Bayonne bank on that day so that they should have reached the bank on June 1st, and the bank should have sent them immediately to Mischkin, who, in all probability, would not have received them until June 2d. Consequently, if Mischkin, learning of the non-payment on June 1st from Bayonne bank, had immediately sent his own notice to the defendant, it would be within due time.

The only question therefore is whether the jury went astray in believing the testimony of Mischkin about sending out this notice. His testimony is attacked in the brief as incredible, but we are unable to say on this rule that it was unworthy of credit. The plaintiff was a finance corporation dealing habitually in paper of this kind and dealing with customers *876of all classes. It may well be that in self protection, the plaintiff corporation took no unnecessary chances with respect to endorsers on its paper. Furthermore, it is pointedly suggested that if Mischkin was going to swear falsely about sending out the notice from his own office, he might with equal plausibility have sworn to sending out the notices received from the bank.

The rule to show cause will be discharged.
§ 38.01-3 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) Certain standards and specifications are incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a). To enforce any edition other than the ones listed in paragraph (b) of this section, notice of change must be published in the Federal Register and the material made available to the public. All approved material is on file at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .* All material is available from the sources indicated in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The standards and specifications approved for incorporation by reference in this part, and the sections affected, are:
American Society for Nondestructive Testing (ASNT) 4153 Arlingate Road, Caller #28518, Columbus, OH, 43228-0518 ASNT “Recommended Practice No. SNT-TC-1A (1988), Personnel Qualification and Certification in Nondestructive Testing”38.25-3(c)(2) American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) International Three Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990 ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section V, Nondestructive Examination (1986)38.25-3(a)(1) American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. ASTM D 4986-98, Standard Test Method for Horizontal Burning Characteristics of Cellular Polymeric Materials38.05-20
[CGD 85-061, 54 FR 50962, Dec. 11, 1989, as amended by USCG-1999-6216, 64 FR 53224, Oct. 1, 1999; USCG-1999-5151, 64 FR 67177, Dec. 1, 1999]
EPA Form 5900-85 

 OMB No. 2060-0336, Approval Expires 04/30/2012

Federal Operating Permit Program (40 CFR Part 71)

 

POTENTIAL TO EMIT (PTE)

For each unit with emissions that count towards applicability, list the emissions unit ID and the PTE for 

the air pollutants listed below and sum them up to show totals for the facility. You may find it helpful to 

complete form EMISS before completing this form. Show other pollutants not listed that are present in 

major amounts at the facility on attachment in a similar fashion. You may round values to the nearest 

tenth of a ton. Also report facility totals in section J of form GIS. 

 

Emissions Unit ID 

Regulated Air Pollutants and Pollutants for which the Source is Major 

(tons/yr) 

 NOx 

 

 VOC SO2 PM10 CO 

 

 Lead HAP 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FACILTY TOTALS 
EPA Form 5900-85 

2

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PTE 

POTENTIAL TO EMIT 

Calculate the total PTE for each air pollutant at the facility for purposes of determining major source 

applicability. 

On each line (row) in the table provided, enter the emissions unit ID and the quantity of each air 

pollutant identified on the form. If form EMISS was prepared previously, simply copy the emission 

values (or stipulations to major source status) contained on those forms to this form. You may round to 

the nearest ton. 

Applicants may stipulate to major source status for an air pollutant and, thereby, avoid detailed PTE 

calculations. If a unit emits in major amounts, enter "MU" in the column for that air pollutant. If the 

facility is a major source for a pollutant but the emissions unit in question does not trigger major source 

status, enter "MS" in the space provided. If a listed pollutant is emitted at a unit but PTE cannot be 

calculated based on readily available information, enter "UN" (for "unknown") in the space provided. If 

the source is a major source for air pollutants not represented by columns on this form, please provide 

an attachment stipulating major source status or the calculation of the total for that air pollutant. The 

column for lead is for elemental lead regulated by a NAAQS, while compounds of lead are HAP. 

The total line is provided at the bottom of each column to enter the total facility-wide PTE for 

applicability purposes (or stipulations to major source status) for each air pollutant reported above. 

Enter these totals, as well as the total PTE and the name of the HAP emitted in the greatest amount, in 

section J of form GIS. 

Only include emissions or emissions units on form PTE that count toward major source applicability. 

Some of the emissions units for which form EMISS may have been prepared may not have emissions 

that count towards major source applicability or may have been included in order to calculate fees. In 

particular, fugitive emissions are not always included in major source applicability determinations for 

non-HAP. However, for major source determinations for HAP, all fugitive HAP must be included. 

END
###### Editorial Note on Part 164

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 164.107-1 Scope.

This subpart prescribes requirements for approval of structural insulation (A-60) for SOLAS vessels as required by the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS). Products approved under these requirements may be used in place of products required to be approved as meeting the requirements of § 164.007.