alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 34.15-15 Piping—T/ALL. ( a ) The piping, valves, and fittings shall have a bursting pressure of not less than 6,000 pounds p.s.i.
( b ) All piping, in nominal sizes not over 3 ⁄ 4-inch shall be at least Schedule 40 (standard weight) and in nominal sizes over 3 ⁄ 4-inch, shall be at least Schedule 80 (extra heavy).
( c ) All piping, valves, and fittings of ferrous materials shall be protected inside and outside against corrosion unless specifically approved otherwise by the Commandant.
( d ) A pressure relief valve or equivalent set to relieve between 2,400 and 2,800 pounds p.s.i. shall be installed in the distributing manifold or such other location as to protect the piping in the event that all branch line shut- off valves are closed.
( e ) All deadend lines shall extend at least 2 inches beyond the last orifice and shall be closed with cap or plug.
( f ) All piping, valves, and fittings shall be securely supported, and where necessary, protected against injury.
( g ) Drains and dirt traps shall be fitted where necessary to prevent the accumulation of dirt or moisture. Drains and dirt traps shall be located in accessible locations where possible.
( h ) Piping shall be used for no other purpose except that it may be incorporated with the fire-detecting system.
( i ) Piping passing through living quarters shall not be fitted with drains or other openings within such spaces.
( j ) Installation test requirements are: ( 1 ) Upon completion of the piping installation, and before the cylinders are connected, a pressure test shall be applied as set forth in this paragraph. Only carbon dioxide or other inert gas shall be used for this test.
( 2 ) The piping from the cylinders to the stop valves in the manifold shall be subjected to a pressure of 1,000 pounds p.s.i. With no additional gas being introduced to the system, it shall be demonstrated that the leakage of the system is such as not to permit a pressure drop of more than 150 pounds per square inch per minute for 2-minute period.
( 3 ) The individual branch lines to the various spaces protected shall be subjected to a test similar to that described in the preceding paragraph with the exception that the pressure used shall be 600 pounds p.s.i. in lieu of 1,000 pounds p.s.i. For the purpose of this test, the distribution piping shall be capped within the space protected at the first joint ahead of the nozzles.
( 4 ) In lieu of the tests prescribed in the preceding paragraphs in this section, small independent systems protecting spaces such as emergency generator rooms, lamp lockers, etc., may be tested by blowing out the piping with the air at a pressure of at least 100 pounds p.s.i.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending November 18, 2006

|Filer                  | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                                 
|---------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|FIRST CHARTER BANK     | * 18C* Branch  | First Charter Bank, Charlotte, North Carolina, to merge with Gwinnett Banking Company, Lawrenceville, Georgia.                                           | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:             | Not available 
|Federal Register:      | Not applicable
|RBC CENTURA BANK       | * 18C* Branch  | RBC Centura Bank, Raleigh, North Carolina, to acquire certain assets and assume certain liabilities of 39 branches of Regions Bank, Birmingham, Alabama. | Newspaper:12/13/2006Federal Register:Not applicable   
|Newspaper:             | 12/13/2006    
|Federal Register:      | Not applicable
|VIRGINIA HERITAGE BANK | * Branch       | Virginia Heritage Bank, Fairfax, Virginia, proposes to establish a branch at 13986 Metrotech Drive, Chantilly, Virginia.                                 | Newspaper:12/04/2006Federal Register:Not applicable   
|Newspaper:             | 12/04/2006    
|Federal Register:      | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                  | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|--------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|PAMPLICO B&TC, PAMPLICO, SOUTH CAROLINA | 549826 | 06/26/2006 | 09/27/2006     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
# C_2014261EN.01000201.xml

| 11.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/2

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 April 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Central Administraivo Norte — Portugal) — Joaquim Fernando Macedo Maia and Others v Fundo de Garantia Salarial, IP

(Case C-511/12) (1)

1

((Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Request for a preliminary ruling - Directive 80/987/EEC - Directive 2002/74/EC - Protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer - Guarantee institutions - Limitation on the payment obligation of the guarantee institution - Salary claims falling due more than six months before the commencement of legal proceedings seeking a declaration of the employer’s insolvency))

2014/C 261/02

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Central Administraivo Norte

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Joaquim Fernando Macedo Maia, António Pereira Teixeira, António Joaquim Moreira David, Joaquim Albino Moreira David

Applicants:

Defendant: Fundo de Garantia Salarial, IP

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Council Directive 80/987/EEC of 20 October 1980 relating to the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer, as amended by Directive 2002/74/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 23 September 2002, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which does not guarantee salary claims falling due more than six months preceding the initiation of insolvency proceedings against the employer, even though the employees brought, before the beginning of that period, legal proceedings against their employer with a view to obtaining a judicial determination of the amount outstanding and an enforcement order to recover those sums.

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.

1

---
To: SAE Interior Climate Control Standards OEM Committee

Subject January 2011 Orlando meetings From: Ward Atkinson DRAFT The current activity on SAE documents covering Standards for R - 1234yf refrigerant is nearing completion. As of this date all documents have been approved by the ICCSC members. Fifteen documents have been approved by the Motor Vehicle Council. One Standard will complete MVC ballot on Jan 9, and the last two of the R - 1234yf documents will be sent to MVC members, and will complete balloting the first part of February. Based upon the current schedule all documents should be published in February 2011. As an ongoing activity during our ICCSC Meeting: Wed., January 26, 2011 at Orlando, Fl, Ms. Yadi Cancel of EPA staff will present a br ief overview of R - 1234yf regulatory activity. Itshould also be noted that during the MACS Convention Drusilla Hufford, Division Director Stratospheric Protection Division and Yadi Cancel along with EPA’s OTAQ and CARB personnel will present information on current regulatory issues and activities. This 90 minute presentation will start at 8:00 am on Saturday morning January 29, 2011. Should vehicle OEMs or others have an interest to discuss any related subjects with EPA staff on Friday afternoon 28 January , 2011 please let me know and give me a list of topics for discussion by Close Of Business 13 January 2011 and we will attempt to schedule a meeting with Ms. Hufford and Ms.Cancel. Contact Ward Atkinson 602.956.9313 or wast@ix.netcom.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5


<CAPTION>

Article 5 Fin. Data Schedule for 1st Qtr 10-Q

<S>                               <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                     0
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           0
<PP&E>                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                        (4,200)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  7,725
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                               4,200
<OTHER-SE>                                 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           3,675
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           0
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       3,675
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      (4,200)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                          (4,200)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                          (4,200)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.00)




</TABLE>
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATON PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of SoundView Technology Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark F.
Loehr, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Mark F. Loehr

Mark F. Loehr
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 Certification
 Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2009 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Samuel L. Neese, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 
 /s/Samuel L. Neese, Jr.
 Samuel L. Neese, Jr.
 Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer
 March 30, 2011


51
1 | P a g e

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

INDEX OF EXHIBITS

Exhibit A: Joseph Fawaz Affidavit

Exhibit B: Letters of Appreciation

Exhibit C: Search Warrant

Exhibit D: Sgt. McKay Video

Exhibit E: Return and Tabulation Form

Exhibit F: Citations Dismissals and Reissuing

Exhibit G: March 2015 Warrant Request

Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 1-2, PageID.27 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 1
§ 194.05-1 General. ( a ) The master shall be held responsible for and shall require the proper handling, stowage, and marking of all chemical stores and reagents.
( b ) Chemical stores shall be stowed in a chemical storeroom in approved drums, barrels, or other packages, properly marked and labeled, as prescribed by 49 CFR part 172 for those specific commodities, except that those chemical stores excluded from the storeroom by §§ 194.20-15 and 194.20-17, and those chemical stores not desired to be located in a chemical storeroom, shall be stored in accordance with the appropriate provisions of 49 CFR part 176 insofar as such regulations apply to cargo vessels.
( c ) Ships' stores shall be regulated in accordance with the appropriate provisions of part 147 of Subchapter N (Dangerous Cargoes) of this chapter.
[CGFR 67-83, 33 FR 1151, Jan. 27, 1968, as amended by CGD 86-033, 53 FR 36027, Sept. 16, 1988]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending January 14, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location           | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|-------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|TRANSATLANTIC BK, MIAMI, FLORIDA | 972237 | 09/12/2005 | 11/10/2005     | S         | Large Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*William H. Leonard and others, *Appellants, v.*The Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments in the City of New York, *Respondents*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs on the opinion of the court below.
#### § 189.60-1 Application.

The provisions of this subpart shall apply to all oceanographic research vessels on an international voyage. (See § 188.05-10 of this subchapter.)

[CGD 95-012, 60 FR 48052, Sept. 18, 1995; 60 FR 50120, Sept. 28, 1995]
---

Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
  Adopted Pursuant to 
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of L.A.M. Pharmaceutical
  Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June
  30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),
  Joseph T. Slechta, the President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial
  Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to
  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.

| | By: | /s/ Joseph T. Slechta                                                 
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     | Joseph T. Slechta, President, Chief Executive Officer,
      Principal
| |     | Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer                        

August 15, 2005

---
#### § 201.172 Time for filing petition to reopen.

Except for good cause shown, and upon leave granted, petition to reopen under § 201.174, shall be filed with the Administration within twenty (20) days after the date of service of the Administration's decision or order in the proceeding, unless a different period is fixed under § 201.54.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 15-20262

Charles Albert Walker, Sean F. Cox

United States District Court Judge

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR COMPASSIONATE RELEASE WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE

On May 19, 2020, Defendant filed a motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 

3582(c)(1). (ECF No. 109). In response, the Government argues that Defendant has failed to 

exhaust his administrative remedies or wait the 30 days necessary to comply with 18 U.S.C. § 

3582(c)(1)(A). (ECF No. 111). 

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) allows a criminal defendant to move to modify his term of 

imprisonment “after the defendant has fully exhausted all administrative rights to appeal a failure 

of the Bureau of Prisons to bring a motion on the defendant’s behalf or the lapse of 30 days from 

the receipt of such a request by the warden of the defendant’s facility, whichever is earlier[.]” The 

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently examined the nature of these 

requirements for a defendant’s motion for compassionate release. In United States v. Alam, 960 

F.3d 831 (6th Cir. June 2, 2020), the Sixth Circuit held that § 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)’s 

exhaustion requirement is a mandatory claim-processing rule. Id. at 833. If a defendant fails to 

Case 2:15-cr-20262-SFC-EAS ECF No. 112 filed 07/09/20 PageID.659 Page 1 of 2
2

comply with this rule, and the Government timely objects to his motion on that basis, the Court 

must enforce the exhaustion requirement and deny the motion without prejudice. Id. at 834, 836. 

The Court may not craft an exception to this statutory exhaustion requirement. Id. at 834. 

Here, Defendant alleges that gave his compassionate release request to his unit manager on 

April 5, 2020. However, the Government has provided documentation from the Bureau of Prisons, 

stating that it has not received a compassionate release request. (ECF No. 111-1). Given this 

contradiction, the Court concludes that Defendant has not satisfied his burden to show that he 

complied with § 3582(c)(1)(A) before he filed this motion. See United States v. McDonald, 2020 

WL 3166741 at *3 (W.D. Tenn. June 8, 2020) (“The defendant bears the burden to show he has 

exhausted his administrative remedies[.]”)

Because Defendant’s motion does not comply with § 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), the Court 

DENIES his motion for compassionate release WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Alam, 960 F.3d at 836. 

Defendant may file a new motion for compassionate release (1) after he properly submits a 

compassionate release request to his warden and fully exhausts his administrative rights to appeal 

an adverse decision, or (2) 30 days after his warden receives his compassionate release request. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Sean F. Cox

Sean F. Cox 

United States District Judge

Dated: July 9, 2020 

Case 2:15-cr-20262-SFC-EAS ECF No. 112 filed 07/09/20 PageID.660 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                                        


We consent to the incorporation of our reports dated April 29, 1998, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements of Workgroup Technology
Corporation as of March 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the years ended March 31,
1998, 1997 and 1996 which reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 
10-K, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8,
File Nos. 333-09161 and 333-11869.



                              COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Boston, Massachusetts
June 25, 1998
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHARLES F. LONGNECKER, II,

Plaintiff, Case no. 15-11705

Honorable John Corbett O’Meara

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is Magistrate Judge David R. Grand’s report and

recommendation, filed September 18, 2015. No objections have been filed by the

parties. The court having conducted a thorough review of the entire file;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the report and recommendation is

ADOPTED as the court’s findings and conclusions. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED

that Defendant’s motion to dismiss (document no. 8) and Plaintiff’s motion for

judgment on the pleadings (document no. 12) are DENIED.

s/John Corbett O’Meara 

United States District Judge

Date: November 10, 2015

5:15-cv-11705-JCO-DRG Doc # 33 Filed 11/10/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 188
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the

parties of record on this date, November 10, 2015, using the ECF system and/or

ordinary mail.

s/William Barkholz 

Case Manager

2

5:15-cv-11705-JCO-DRG Doc # 33 Filed 11/10/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 189
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49223, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60144, Sept. 30, 2013.

#### § 2.75-70 Welding procedure and performance qualifications.

(a) Welding procedures and welder performance utilized in the fabrication of vessels and their various systems and components subject to Coast Guard inspection shall be qualified as required by the applicable subchapter. For applicable requirements see §§ 32.60-1(a) of subchapter D (Tank Vessels), § 72.01-15 of subchapter H (Passenger Vessels), § 92.01-10 of subchapter I (Cargo and Miscellaneous Vessels), or § 190.01-10 of subchapter U (Oceanographic Vessels) of this chapter. See part 57 of subchapter F (Marine Engineering) for requirements for the welding of pressure piping, boilers, pressure vessels, and nonpressure vessel type tanks, and associated secondary barriers as defined in § 38.05-4 of subchapter D (Tank Vessels) of this chapter.

[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18804, Dec. 18, 1968]