alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-10628 

 (consolidated with Case No. 15-11624) 

v. Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

VERSATA SOFTWARE, INC. et al.

 Defendants. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (ECF No. 818) 

On May 25, 2022, Ford Motor Company filed a motion for reconsideration of 

the Court’s May 11, 2022, order denying Ford’s motion in limine to preclude Versata 

Software, Inc., Trilogy Development Group, Inc., and Trilogy, Inc. (collectively, 

“Versata”) from offering argument, testimony, or other evidence of contract 

damages at trial. (See Order, ECF No. 817; Ford Mot., ECF No. 818.) The Court 

has carefully reviewed the motion and Versata’s response, and the Court concludes

that Ford has not satisfied the standards for reconsideration set forth in Local Rule 

7.1(h)(2)(A)-(C). Moreover, Ford has not persuaded the Court that it necessarily 

misread or misinterpreted footnote 11 of Dr. Craig Elson and Christopher Bokhart’s 

2018 expert report or that it erred in any of the other ways identified by Ford in the 

motion for reconsideration. The Court remains convinced that (1) Versata’s 

disclosures, although imperfect, were sufficient to put Ford on notice of Versata’s 

Case 2:15-cv-10628-MFL-EAS ECF No. 827, PageID.57427 Filed 06/13/22 Page 1 of 2
2 

damages theory and (2) the remainder of Ford’s arguments sound in summary 

judgment and are not properly presented in a motion in limine. For all of these 

reasons, Ford’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 818) is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

Dated: June 13, 2022 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on June 13, 2022, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Ryan 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5126 

Case 2:15-cv-10628-MFL-EAS ECF No. 827, PageID.57428 Filed 06/13/22 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Columbia Futures Fund and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       7,453,047
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,294<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,266,313<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,266,313<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              (231,603)<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               587,974
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (819,577)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (819,577)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (819,577)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $30,628 and due from
DWR of $3,666.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized loss on open contracts of $(221,028).
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $15,612, accrued
management fees of $23,795 and administrative expenses payable of
$104,020.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $43,859,
net change in unrealized of $(555,316) and interest income of $279,854.
</FN>



</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 356
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 356 appear at 68 FR 5576, Feb. 4, 2003.

§ 356.41 Management agreements. ( a ) An owner or bareboat charterer of a Fishing Industry Vessel may enter into a management agreement with a Non-Citizen in which the management company provides marketing services, consulting services or other services that are ministerial in nature and do not convey control of the vessel to the Non-Citizen.
( b ) An owner or bareboat charterer of a Fishing Industry Vessel may not enter into a management agreement that allows the Non-Citizen to appoint, discipline or replace the crew or the master, direct the operations of the vessel or to otherwise effectively gain control over the management and operation of the vessel or vessel-owning entity.
( c ) The owner or bareboat charterer must file with the Citizenship Approval Officer a description of any management agreement entered into with a Non-Citizen. The description must be submitted within 30 days of the execution and must include: ( 1 ) A description of the agreement with a summary of the terms and conditions, and,
( 2 ) A representation and warranty that the agreement does not contain any provisions that convey control over the vessel or vessel-owning entity to a Non-Citizen.
( d ) The Citizenship Approval Officer may request a copy of any management agreement to determine if it contains provisions that convey control over the vessel or vessel-owning entity to a Non-Citizen.
# C_2012235EN.01001208.xml

| 4.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/12

---

Order of the President of the Court of 19 April 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Trianon Productie BV v Revillon Chocolatier SAS

(Case C-2/12) (1)

1

2012/C 235/30

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 31.3.2012.

1

---
#### § 196.53-1 Officers.

All officers on a vessel must have their licenses or officer endorsements conspicuously displayed.

[USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11267, Mar. 16, 2009]
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2522 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To raise the ceiling on the Federal share of the cost of 

the Calleguas Municipal Water District Recycling 

Project, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2522 RFS 

1 That section 1631(d) of the Reclamation Wastewater and 

2 Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (43 U.S.C. 390h– 

3 13(d)) is amended— 

4 (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘paragraph 

5 (2)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraphs (2) and (3)’’; and 

6 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(3) In the case of the Calleguas Municipal Water 

8 District Recycling Project authorized by section 1616, the 

9 Federal share of the cost of the Project may not exceed 

10 the sum determined by adding— 

11 ‘‘(A) the amount that applies to the Project 

12 under paragraph (1); and 

13 ‘‘(B) $40,000,000.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 22, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cameco Corporation (the Company)
on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David M. Petroff,
Senior Vice-President, Finance & Administration & Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|    |  |                                                                                           
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ David M. Petroff                                                                      
|    |  |                                                                                           
|    |  | David M. Petroff
Senior Vice-President, Finance & Administration
& Chief Financial Officer

March 19, 2004
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Florida Business BancGroup, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Marti J. Warren, Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  |                                             
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|                   |  |  | 
|Date:  May 6, 2003 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Marti J. Warren
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                     | 
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  | Marti J. Warren, Principal Financial Officer
Order filed, November 5, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00910-CV

____________

IN THE MATTER OF H.C, Appellant

On Appeal from the 359th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-03-02932 JV

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due October 22, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The 

record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed 

timely, we issue the following order.

We order Cherie Reegs and Darlene Forville, the court reporters, to file their

records in this appeal within thirty days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date: 

11 a.m., Friday, June 29, 2007.

# Place: 

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status: 

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered: 

Surveillance Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information: 

Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan, 

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-2528 Filed 5-17-07; 11:21 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
#### BALBACH SMELTING AND REFINING COMPANY, NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, PROSECUTOR, v. STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT, RESPONDENT.

Argued February 6, 1929

Decided March 11, 1929.

Before Justices Tbenohabd, Kalisch and Lloyd.

Eor the prosecutor, *Ralph 0. Willguss.*

Eor the respondent, *William A. Stevens,*attorney-general.

Pee Cueiam.

We have examined with care the affidavit and exhibits used on this application, as well as the briefs of counsel submitted in connection therewith.

To us, it seems quite apparent that this application for a writ of *certiorari*must be denied under our decided cases. *Alton Machine Co.*v. *State Board of Assessors,*69 *Atl. Rep.*451; *Phonograph Co.*v. *Board of Assessors,*54 *N. J. L.*430; *Burlington Distilling Co.*v. *State Board of Taxes and Assessment,*86 *Id.*92; *Edison Phonograph Co.*v. *Assessors,*57 *Id.*520. See, also, *Standard Underground Cable Co.*v. *Attorney-General,*46 *N. J. Eq.*270, and *American Glucose Co.*v. *New Jersey,*43 *Id.*280.

The application for the writ will be denied accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,105
<SECURITIES>                                   631,660
<RECEIVABLES>                                  708,192
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,534
<INVENTORY>                                     60,252
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,440,115
<PP&E>                                         195,580
<DEPRECIATION>                                  88,218
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,045,779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          847,514
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     4,210,925
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,381,890)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,045,779
<SALES>                                      2,739,620
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,739,620
<CGS>                                        1,614,227
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,614,227
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,418
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (637,730)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
§ 295.30 Payment. ( a ) *Amount payable.* A MSP Operating Agreement shall provide, subject to the availability of appropriations and to the extent the agreement is in effect, for each Agreement Vessel, an annual payment of $2,100,000 for each fiscal year. This amount shall be paid in equal monthly installments at the end of each month. The annual amount payable shall not be reduced except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section and § 295.31(a)(3).
( b ) *Reductions in amount payable.* ( 1 ) The annual amount otherwise payable under a MSP Operating Agreement shall be reduced on a pro rata basis for each day less than 320 in a fiscal year that an Agreement Vessel is not operated exclusively in the U.S.-foreign trade or in mixed foreign and domestic trade allowed under a registry endorsement issued under 46 U.S.C. 12105. Days during which the vessel is drydocked or undergoing survey, inspection, or repair shall be considered to be days during which the vessel is operated, provided the total of such days within a fiscal year does not exceed 30 days, unless prior to the expiration of a vessel's 30 day period, approval is obtained from MARAD for an extension of the 30 day provision.
( 2 ) There shall be no payment for any day that a MSP Agreement Vessel is engaged in transporting more than 7,500 tons (using the U.S. English standard of short tons, which converts to 6,696.75 long tons, or 6,803.85 metric tons) of civilian bulk preference cargoes pursuant to section 901(a), 901(b), or 901b of the act, provided that it is bulk cargo.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2013

t1216

Order 

Clerk

December 23, 2013

147721

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147721

COA: 303236 

Berrien CC: 2010-001540-FH

LOREN TROUEZE ROBINSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 30, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 30.30-5 Submission of evaluation materials. ( a ) The evaluation materials listed in § 30.30-3 should be sent to Commandant (CG-CVC), Attn: Office of Commercial Vessel Compliance, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7501, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7501. The materials should include the name and address of the person to whom correspondence concerning the evaluation can be sent.
( b ) Updated materials may be submitted at any time during the evaluation process.
[CGD 79-081a, 45 FR 23427, Apr. 7, 1980, as amended by CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50461, Sept. 29, 1995; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50726, Sept. 27, 1996; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49226, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60146, Sept. 30, 2013]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, June 15, 2007, 8 a.m. to June 15, 2007, 5 p.m. Serrano Hotel, 405 Taylor Street, San Francisco, CA 94102 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 4, 2007, 72 FR 25324-25325.                

The meeting will be held one day only on June 14, 2007. The meeting time and location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: May 8, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2424 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M