alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013225EN.01002802.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/28

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 June 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil no 1 de Granada — Spain) — Promociones y Construcciones BJ 200 SL

o

(Case C-125/12) (1)

1

(VAT - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 199(1)(g) - Voluntary insolvency proceedings - Person liable for payment of tax - Liability of the person who is the recipient of certain transactions - Concept of ‘compulsory sale procedure’)

2013/C 225/46

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Granada

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Promociones y Construcciones BJ 200 SL

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Granada — Interpretation of Article 199(1)(g) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1) — Persons liable for payment of tax — Taxable person who is the recipient of certain transactions — Concept of ‘the supply of immovable property sold by a judgment debtor in a compulsory sale procedure’

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 199(1)(g) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that every sale of immovable property by a judgment debtor carried out not only in the course of the liquidation of the debtor’s assets but also in the course of insolvency proceedings occurring before such liquidation comes within the concept of a compulsory sale procedure, provided that such a sale is necessary in order either to settle creditors’ claims or to enable the debtor to re-establish its economic or professional activities.

---

(1)  OJ C 174, 16.6.2012.

1

---
§ 221.75 Response by party. ( a ) Within 30 days after receipt of notice from the Hearing Officer, the Party, or counsel for the Party, may— ( 1 ) Pay the amount specified in the notice as being appropriate;
( 2 ) In writing request a hearing, specifying the issues in dispute; or
( 3 ) Submit written evidence or arguments in lieu of a hearing.
( b ) The right to a hearing is waived if the Party does not submit a request to the Hearing Officer within 30 days after receipt of notice from the Hearing Officer, unless additional time has been granted by the Hearing Officer.
( c ) The Hearing Officer has discretion as to the venue and scheduling of a hearing. The hearing will normally be held at the office of the Hearing Officer. A request for a change of location of a hearing or transfer to another Hearing Officer must be in writing and state the reasons why the requested action is necessary or desirable. Action on the request is at the discretion of the Hearing Officer.
( d ) A Party who has requested a hearing may amend the specification of the issues in dispute at any time up to 10 days before the scheduled date of the hearing. Issues raised later than 10 days before the schedule hearing may be presented only at the discretion of the Hearing Officer.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending September 16, 2006

|Filer                                    | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                   | End of Comment Period                                
|---------------------------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|CATHAY FINANCIAL HOLDING CO., LTD.       | * 3A1         | Cathay Financial Holding Co., Ltd., and Cathay Life Insurance Co., Ltd., to acquire up to 9.99 percent of First Financial Holding Co., Ltd., and Chinatrust Financial Holding Co., Ltd., all of Taipei, Taiwan.   | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                               | Not available
|Federal Register:                        | Not available
|INDUSTRIAL BANK OF TAIWAN CO., LTD., THE | * 3A1         | The Industrial Bank of Taiwan Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan, and IBT Holdings Corp., Cerritos, California, to become bank holding companies by acquiring 100 percent of EverTrust Bank, City of Industry, California. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:09/07/2006   
|Newspaper:                               | Not available
|Federal Register:                        | 09/07/2006   
|NHB HOLDINGS, INC.                       | * 3A1         | NHB Holdings, Inc., Jacksonville, Florida, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Volvo Commercial Credit Corp. of Utah, which will be renamed Globility Bank, Salt Lake City, Utah.        | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:09/22/2006   
|Newspaper:                               | Not available
|Federal Register:                        | 09/22/2006   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 201.41 Form and appearance of documents filed with the Administration. All papers to be filed under the regulations in this part may be reproduced by printing or by any other process, provided the copies are clear and legible; shall be dated, the original signed in ink, and shall show the docket description and title of the proceeding, and the title, if any, and address of the signatory. If typewritten, the impression shall be on only one side of the paper and shall be double spaced, except that quotations shall be single spaced and indented. Documents not printed, except correspondence and exhibits, should be on strong, durable paper and shall not be more than 81 ⁄ 2 inches wide and 12 inches long, with a left margin 11 ⁄ 2 inches wide. Printed documents shall be printed in clear type (never smaller than pica or 11-point type) adequately leaded, and the paper shall be opaque and unglazed. Briefs, if printed, shall be printed on paper not less than 61 ⁄ 8 inches wide and 91 ⁄ 4 inches long, with inside margin not less than 1 inch wide. All briefs over 15 pages shall contain a subject index with page references and a list of authorities cited.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2411 

To direct the Architect of the Capitol to fly the flag of a State over the 

Capitol each year on the anniversary of the date of the State’s admission 

to the Union. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2009 

Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To direct the Architect of the Capitol to fly the flag of 

a State over the Capitol each year on the anniversary 

of the date of the State’s admission to the Union. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Admission Day 

5 Recognition Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FLYING STATE FLAG OVER CAPITOL ON ANNIVER7 SARY OF STATE’S ADMISSION TO UNION. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—To honor the anniversary of each 

9 State’s admission to the Union, the Architect of the CapVerDate Nov 24 2008 23:09 May 15, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2411.IH H2411

jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2411 IH

1 itol shall fly the flag of the State over the Capitol each 

2 year on the anniversary of the date of the State’s admis3 sion to the Union. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Architect of the Capitol 

6 shall fly the first flag of a State over the Capitol 

7 under this section on the first September 9 which 

8 occurs after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

9 in honor of the anniversary of the admission of Cali10 fornia to the Union. 

11 (2) TREATMENT OF FIRST FLAG FLOWN.—The 

12 Architect shall present the first State flag flown over 

13 the Capitol under this section (as described in para14 graph (1)) to the Native Sons and Daughters of the 

15 Golden West. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0667

MONTANA DEMOCRATIC PARTY and MITCH BOHN, WESTERN 

NATIVE VOICE, et al., MONTANA YOUTH ACTION, et al.,

Plaintiffs and Appellees,

v.

CHRISTI JACOBSEN, in her official capacity as Montana Secretary of 

State,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER GRANTING SCHOLARS OF STATE CONSTITUTIONAL 

LAW LEAVE TO APPEAR AS AMICI CURIAE

Pursuant to the Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Amici Curiae 

Brief filed by Professors Miriam Seifter and Robert Yablon of the State 

Democracy Research Initiative at the University of Wisconsin Law 

School, and for good cause shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The 

Amicus Brief filed by the proposed Amici on July 7, 2023, shall be 

lodged by the Clerk of the Supreme Court and served by Amici on all 

parties.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 12 2023

07/12/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0667
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,311
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              47
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,005
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            45,608
<LOANS>                                        167,973
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,151
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 223,108
<DEPOSITS>                                     167,548
<SHORT-TERM>                                    19,368
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,841
<LONG-TERM>                                      9,549
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,237
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 223,108
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,830
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,361
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    11
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,202
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,312
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,018
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,184
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      210
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,611
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,651
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,183
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                        533
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,160
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,832
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      909
<RECOVERIES>                                        18
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,151
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,151
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 199

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 199 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59789, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 199.200 General.

Passenger vessels and special purpose vessels described in § 199.10(e), must meet the requirements in this subpart in addition to the requirements in subparts A and B of this part.

[CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25313, May 20, 1996, as amended by USCG-1999-6216, 64 FR 53229, Oct. 1, 1999]
#### § 25.26-1 Definitions.

As used in this subpart:

*Berthing space* means a space that is intended to be used for sleeping and is provided with installed bunks and mattresses.

*EPIRB* means an Emergency Position Indicating Radiobeacon which is Type Accepted by the Federal Communications Commission under requirements in 47 CFR parts 2 and 80.

*Galley* means a space that provides for the preparation and extended storage of food. This does not include small alcohol or propane stoves with limited cooking capability, or ice chests or similar devices that are intended for keeping small quantities of food for short durations.

*High seas* means the waters beyond a line three nautical miles seaward of the Territorial Sea Baseline as defined in 33 CFR 2.20.

*Length* means the length listed on a vessel's Certificate of Documentation or Certificate of Number.

*Uninspected passenger vessel* means a vessel which, when used for commercial service, is used solely to carry passengers for hire or to provide non-emergency assistance to boaters (assistance towing), and which is not inspected by the Coast Guard under any other 46 CFR subchapter.

Note:

As an example, a vessel on a voyage involving catching fish which are to be sold, is a commercial fishing industry vessel for the purposes of the EPIRB regulations in this section, even if there are passengers on board during the voyage.

[CGD 87-016a, 58 FR 13367, Mar. 10, 1993, as amended by USCG-2007-29018, 72 FR 53964, Sept. 21, 2007]
# C_2014315EN.01000701.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 July 2014 — European Commission v Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI), Hellenic Republic

(Case C-554/12 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Competition - Article 86(3) EC - Maintenance of preferential rights granted by the Hellenic Republic in favour of a public undertaking for the exploration and exploitation of lignite deposits - Infringement - Decision - Incompatibility with EU law - Subsequent decision - Establishment of specific measures - Solution to the anti-competitive effects of the infringement - Action for annulment))

2014/C 315/09

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: T. Christoforou and A. Antoniadis, acting as Agents, assisted by A. Oikonomou, dikigoros)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) (represented by: P. Anestis, dikigoros), Hellenic Republic (represented by: P. Mylonopoulos, M.-T. Marinos and K. Boskovits, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in DEI v Commission, T-421/09, EU:T:2012:450; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in DEI v Commission, T-421/09, EU:T:2012:450;

| 2. | Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;

| 3. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 2.2.2013.

1

---
#### CHARLES J. QUIMBY, Respondent, *v.*HORACE B. CLAFLIN and Others, Appellants.

*Amendment to complaint*— a *cause of action barred by iho statute of limitations*- *cannot be allowed to be inserted as an a/mendment.*

Appeal from an order made at a Special Term, allowing the plaintiff to amend his complaint.

The court at General Term said: “ The order appealed from gave leave to the plaintiff to amend his complaint by adding, as a third cause of action, a further claim against the defendant of thirty- . four thousand dollars.

“The claim was barred by the statute of limitations. We arq1' of opinion that the order was unauthorized. The defendants have a right to the bar of the statute. It is conceded that the plaintiff could not maintain an original action on the claim. The claim is *612gone. Does it alter the rights of the parties that the plaintiff happens to have another litigation with defendant, into which it is proposed to incorporate this claim. On the theory of the plaintiffs, the pendency of an action between parties, it may be on a single promissory note, would keep alive all contract claims against either party during the time consumed by the litigation, at least to the extent of making it discretionary with the court to allow the prosecution of such claims by means of an amendment to the pending action. We think this cannot be. The uniform current of authority is opposed to such a doctrine.” *^Weston*v. *Worden,*19 Wend., 648; *Willink*v. Renwick, 22 id., 608; *Williams*v. Cooper, 1 Hill, 637.)

*Robert 8. Green,*for the appellants.

*I. T. Williams,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Cullen, J.

Present — Barnard, P. J., Dykman and Cullen, JJ.

Order reversed, with costs and disbursements.
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*James H. Pierce, *Appellant, v.*Oatman Covill and others, *Respondents*.

Order reversed and order granted directing trial of the traverse at circuit, costs to abide event. Order to be settled by Learned, P. J. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
#### In the Matter of the Application of the New York, West Shore and Buffalo Railway Company, etc.

Order to appraise lands of Elizabeth W. Christie and others, affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Dykman, J., not sitting.
#### § 28.805 Launching of survival craft.

In addition to the survival craft requirements in subpart B, each vessel must have a gate or other opening in the deck rails, lifelines, or bulwarks adjacent to the stowage location of each survival craft which has a mass of more than 50 kilograms (110 pounds), so that the survival craft can be manually launched.
5:15-cv-10057-JCO-MJH Doc # 6 Filed 03/05/15 Pg 1 of 10 Pg ID 68
5:15-cv-10057-JCO-MJH Doc # 6 Filed 03/05/15 Pg 2 of 10 Pg ID 69
5:15-cv-10057-JCO-MJH Doc # 6 Filed 03/05/15 Pg 3 of 10 Pg ID 70
5:15-cv-10057-JCO-MJH Doc # 6 Filed 03/05/15 Pg 4 of 10 Pg ID 71
5:15-cv-10057-JCO-MJH Doc # 6 Filed 03/05/15 Pg 5 of 10 Pg ID 72
5:15-cv-10057-JCO-MJH Doc # 6 Filed 03/05/15 Pg 6 of 10 Pg ID 73
5:15-cv-10057-JCO-MJH Doc # 6 Filed 03/05/15 Pg 7 of 10 Pg ID 74
5:15-cv-10057-JCO-MJH Doc # 6 Filed 03/05/15 Pg 8 of 10 Pg ID 75
5:15-cv-10057-JCO-MJH Doc # 6 Filed 03/05/15 Pg 9 of 10 Pg ID 76
5:15-cv-10057-JCO-MJH Doc # 6 Filed 03/05/15 Pg 10 of 10 Pg ID 77
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER Appellate case name: Erin Broussard v. Roy Arnel Appellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 0 0687

- CV

Trial court case number: 16

- DCV

- 233665

Trial court: 328t h District Court of Fort Bend County Appellant, Erin Broussard, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s order in a suit to modify the parent

- child relationship. Appellee, Roy Arnel, has filed a “M otion to D ismiss A ppeal Due to Interference with Child Custody,” contending that this Court should dismiss the appeal and affirm the trial court’s judgment because of appellant’s failure to comply with a court order under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c). Appellee assert s that appellant has failed to comply with three trial court orders, an Order on Emergency Temporary Order, an Order on Motion for Temporary Orders Pending Appeal, and the challenged order on appeal, the order in suit to modify parent

- child relationship. This Court requested a response by appellant to the motion to dismiss and granted appellant’s requests to extend her time to file her brief until December 31, 2018, and to file her response until December 14, 2018. On December 10, 2018, appe llant filed a response to the motion to dismiss. Appellant contends that Rule 42.3(c) does not apply to failure to comply with trial court orders , only with appellate court orders

. See O’Connor v. Sam Houston Med. Hosp., Inc. , 807 S.W.2d 574, 576 (Tex. 1 991); Dzierwa v. Cerda , No. 04

- 13

- 00407

- CV, 2014 WL 3843950, at *2 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Aug. 6, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op.) ; T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c). Rule 60(a), the predecessor to Rule 42.3(c), “does not authorize dismissal of an appeal for failure of the appellant to comply with an order of the trial court.” O’Connor , 807 S.W.2d at 576 ; see also Dzierwa , 2014 WL 3843950, at *2

. Accordingly, appellee’s motion is denied

. Broussard ’s appell ant’s brief remains due by December 31 , 201 8

. It is so ORDERED. Judge’s signature: ____

/s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

_____ ___ x Acting individually Acting for the Court Date: __ December 20, 2018

____