alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2439 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2439

  To prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from issuing oil and gas 
leases on portions of the Outer Continental Shelf located off the coast 
                             of New Jersey.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2009

Mr. LoBiondo (for himself, Mr. Frelinghuysen, Mr. Lance, and Mr. Smith 
of New Jersey) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from issuing oil and gas 
leases on portions of the Outer Continental Shelf located off the coast 
                             of New Jersey.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON OIL AND GAS LEASING OFF THE COAST OF NEW 
              JERSEY.

    (a) Prohibition.--The Secretary of the Interior shall not issue a 
lease, permit, or license for the exploration for or extraction of oil 
or gas on or from submerged lands described in subsection (b).
    (b) Lands Described.--The submerged lands with respect to which 
subsection (a) applies are all submerged lands seaward from the 
landward boundary of the Outer Continental Shelf that lie within 125 
miles of any point of the coast line of the State of New Jersey.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 23.1



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors and Shareholders
SIPEX Corporation

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-06123, 333-32329 and 333-31410) on Form S-8 of SIPEX Corporation of our
report dated February 15, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
SIPEX Corporation as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, which report appears in
the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of SIPEX Corporation.

The report of KPMG LLP covering the December 31, 1999 financial statements
contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 1998 and for the two-year period then ended, have
been restated to reflect a pooling-of-interests transaction with Calogic
Corporation. The 1999 and 1998 financial statements of Calogic Corporation were
audited by Sallman, Yang & Alameda and the report of KPMG LLP, insofar as it
relates to the amounts included for Calogic Corporation as of December 31, 1998
and for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, is based solely on
the report of Sallman, Yang & Alameda.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 21, 2000
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

SOPHIA EGGLESTON 

Plaintiffs, 

v. Case No. 15-11893 

LEE DANIELS, et al. HON. TERRENCE G. BERG 

 HON. ELIZABETH A. STAFFORD 

Defendants. 

 / 

ORDER NOTIFYING PLAINTIFF THAT 

REQUEST FOR HEARING IS DENIED AS UNTIMELY (DKT. 8) 

 This is a copyright infringement case. Plaintiff Sophia Eggleston filed a 

complaint against Defendants on May 27, 2015 alleging that her memoir The 

Hidden Hand was the inspiration for the television series Empire, and in particular 

for the character Cookie Lyon. (Dkt. 1, ¶¶ 73-80.) Before the Court is Plaintiff’s 

June 10, 2015 request for a hearing. (Dkt. 8.) Because Defendants have not yet been 

served with the summons and complaint, Plaintiff’s request will be DENIED as 

untimely. 

 Plaintiff requests “to see [the] Judge” as soon as possible because she has felt 

threatened by various individuals since filing her lawsuit. (Id. at 1-2.) However, 

Plaintiff only just filed her complaint on May 27, 2015. (Dkt. 1.) Defendants in this 

case have not yet been served with the summons and complaint, and have therefore 

not been notified that they are being sued nor have they had sufficient opportunity 

4:15-cv-11893-TGB-EAS Doc # 9 Filed 06/15/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 626
2 

to respond.1 See generally Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, 12. It would therefore be inappropriate 

at this time for the Court to convene a hearing in this case. As soon as appropriate, 

the Court will hear from the parties. Plaintiff’s request for hearing is thus DENIED 

as untimely. 

SO ORDERED. 

s/Terrence G. Berg 

TERRENCE G. BERG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: June 15, 2015 

Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that this Order was electronically submitted on June 15, 2015, using the 

CM/ECF system, which will send notification to each party. 

 By: s/A. Chubb 

Case Manager 

                                                            

1 Defendants must be served within 120 days after the complaint is filed or “the court—on motion or 

on its own after notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that 

defendant or order that service be made within a specified time.” Fed. R. Civ P. 4(m). Once properly 

served, Defendants have an additional 21 days to respond to the complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a). 

Plaintiff is also advised, however, that should she believe she is being threatened in any way by any 

person or party, her proper course of action is to contact the police as soon as possible, rather than to 

seek a court hearing. 

4:15-cv-11893-TGB-EAS Doc # 9 Filed 06/15/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 627
#### § 308.100 Insured amount.

An applicant for war risk hull insurance shall state the amount of insurance desired but any payment of claim for damage to or actual or constructive total loss of the vessel insured shall be made as provided in § 308.103(a). An applicant desiring disbursements insurance may at his option obtain such additional insurance but any claim for loss of disbursements as a consequence of the actual or constructive total loss of the vessel insured shall be made as provided in § 308.103(c).
Exhibit 31.3





Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer



I, Robert M. Little, Jr., certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Highlands Bankshares, Inc.



2.   Based on my  knowledge,  this  report  does not  contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this report;



3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present in all  material respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.   The registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,  including its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by  others  within  those entities,  particularly  during the period in which this   report is being prepared;



(b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)  disclosed  in  this   report  any  change  in the  registrant's internal  control  over  financial reporting  that  occurred  during  the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,  the registrant's  internal control  over financial reporting; and



5.   The registrant's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,  based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)  all significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to record,  process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)  any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over financial reporting.





Date: March 26, 2005

/s/ Robert M. Little, Jr.

Robert M. Little, Jr.

Chief Financial Officer
# C_2011282EN.01002801.xml

| 24.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/28

---

Action brought on 4 July 2011 — Lyder Enterprises v CPVO Liner Plants NZ (1993) (Southern Splendour)

(Case T-367/11)

2011/C 282/57

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Lyder Enterprises Ltd (Auckland, New Zealand) (represented by: G. Pickering, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Liner Plants NZ (1993) Ltd (Waitakere, New Zealand)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Set aside and annul the decision of the Board of Appeal of the Community Plant Variety Office of 18 February 2011 in case A007/2010; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside and annul the decision of the Board of Appeal of the Community Plant Variety Office of 18 February 2011 in case A007/2010; and

| — | Stay the proceedings until the final decision of the High Court of New Zealand in case No CIV:2011:404:2969 is taken. |
| --- | --- |

—

Stay the proceedings until the final decision of the High Court of New Zealand in case No CIV:2011:404:2969 is taken.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for Community plant variety right: The applicant

Applicant for Community plant variety right:

Community plant variety right concerned: Southern Splendour — Community plant variety right application No 2006/1888

Community plant variety right concerned:

Objector to the Community plant variety right application: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Objector to the Community plant variety right application:

Grounds of the objection: The objection was based on the contention that the applicant was not the person who bred, or discovered and developed the variety, or his successor in title

Grounds of the objection:

Decision of the Committee of the CPVO: Refused the application No 2006/1888 for the variety ‘Southern Splendour’ (Decision No R972)

Decision of the Committee of the CPVO:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of the audi alteram partum rule, lack of competence, failure to understand the fundamental rules of natural justice and infringement of an essential procedural requirement, as the Board of Appeal decided that the evidence contained in the applicant’s letters was not acceptable as it was not in affidavit format.

Pleas in law:

audi alteram partum

---
§ 28.570 Intact righting energy. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, each vessel must have the following properties in each condition of loading: ( 1 ) An initial metacentric height (GM) of at least 1.15 feet (0.35 meters);
( 2 ) A righting arm (GZ) of at least 0.66 feet (0.2 meters) at an angle of heel not less than 30° (0.52 radians);
( 3 ) A maximum righting arm that occurs at an angle of heel not less than 25° (0.44 radians);
( 4 ) An area under each righting arm curve of at least 16.9 foot-degrees (0.090 meter-radians) up to the lesser of 40° (0.70 radians) or the angle of downflooding;
( 5 ) An area under each righting arm curve of at least 10.3 foot-degrees (0.055 meter-radians) up to an angle of heel of 30° (0.52 radians);
( 6 ) An area under each righting arm curve of at least 5.6 foot-degrees (0.030 meter-radians) between 30° (0.52 radians) and the lesser of 40° (0.70 radians) or the angle of downflooding; and
( 7 ) Except as provided by paragraph (b) of this section, positive righting arms through an angle of heel of 60° (1.05 radians).
( b ) In lieu of meeting the requirements of paragraph (a)(7) of this section, a vessel may comply with the following provisions: ( 1 ) Hatches in the watertight/weathertight envelope must be normally kept closed at sea (e.g., the live tank hatch is only opened intermittently, under controlled conditions); or
( 2 ) Unintentional flooding through these hatches must not result in progressive flooding to other spaces; and
( 3 ) In all cases, a vessel must have positive righting arms through an angle of heel of at least 50° (0.87 radians) and the intact stability analysis must consider that spaces accessed by such hatches to be flooded full or flooded to the level having the most detrimental effect on stability when free surface effects are considered.
( c ) In lieu of meeting the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, a vessel may comply with the provisions of § 170.173(c) of this chapter, provided that righting arms are positive to an angle of heel of not less than 50° (0.87 radians).
( d ) For the purpose of paragraphs (a) and (c) of this section, at each angle of heel a vessel's righting arm must be calculated assuming the vessel is permitted to trim free until the trimming moment is zero.
**Exhibit 24**

 

 

**POWER OF ATTORNEY OF EDS DIRECTOR**

 

 

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that theundersigned Director of Electronic Data Systems Corporation, a Delawarecorporation, which will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission,Washington, D.C., under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,an Annual Report for 2007 on Form 10-K, hereby constitutes and appoints RonaldA. Rittenmeyer, Jeffrey M. Heller, Ronald P. Vargo and Storrow M. Gordon his orher true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power to actwithout the others, to execute such Form 10-K and any and all amendmentsthereto on behalf of the undersigned in the capacity indicated. 

 

        INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney effectiveas of February 5, 2008. 

 

 

                                                                                               /S/ W. ROY DUNBAR                          

*Director*

 

                                                                                               /S/ MARTIN C. FAGA                          

*Director*

 

                                                                                               /S/ S. MALCOLM GILLIS                    

*Director*

 

                                                                                               /S/ RAY J. GROVES                             

*Director*

 

                                                                                               /S/ ELLEN M. HANCOCK                   

*Director*

 

                                                                                               /S/ JEFFREY M. HELLER                     

*Director*

 

                                                                                               /S/ RAY L. HUNT                                 

*Director*

 

                                                                                               /S/ EDWARD A. KANGAS                  

*Director*

 

                                                                                               /S/ JAMES K. SIMS                              

*Director*

 

                                                                                               /S/ R. DAVID YOST                             

*Director*

* *

                                                                                                /S/ ERNESTO ZEDILLO                      

*Director*

* *
§ 174.145 Intact stability requirements. ( a ) In each condition of loading and operation, each vessel must be shown by design calculations to meet the requirements of paragraphs (b) through (e) of this section.
( b ) The area under each righting arm curve must be at least 16.9 foot-degrees (5.15 meter-degrees) up to the smallest of the following angles: ( 1 ) The angle of maximum righting arm.
( 2 ) The downflooding angle.
( 3 ) 40 degrees.
( c ) The area under each righting arm curve must be at least 5.6 foot-degrees (1.72 meter-degrees) between the angles of 30 degrees and 40 degrees, or between 30 degrees and the downflooding angle if this angle is less than 40 degrees.
( d ) The maximum righting arm shall occur at a heel of at least 25 degrees.
( e ) The righting arm curve must be positive to at least 60 degrees.
( f ) For the purpose of this section, at each angle of heel, a vessel's righting arm may be calculated considering either— ( 1 ) The vessel is permitted to trim free until the trimming moment is zero; or
( 2 ) The vessel does not trim as it heels.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2325 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 135
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2325

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 16, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             July 30, 2009

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1300 Matamoros Street in Laredo, Texas, as the ``Laredo Veterans 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAREDO VETERANS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1300 Matamoros Street in Laredo, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Laredo Veterans Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Laredo 
Veterans Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 135

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2325

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1300 Matamoros Street in Laredo, Texas, as the ``Laredo Veterans 
                             Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 30, 2009

                       Reported without amendment
```
§ 111.60-23 Metal-clad (Type MC) cable. ( a ) Metal-clad (Type MC) cable permitted on board a vessel must be continuous corrugated metal-clad cable.
( b ) The cable must have a corrugated gas-tight, vapor-tight, and watertight sheath of aluminum or other suitable metal that is close-fitting around the conductors and fillers and that has an overall jacket of an impervious PVC or thermoset material.
( c ) The cable is not allowed in areas or applications exposed to high vibration, festooning, repeated flexing, excessive movement, or twisting, such as in engine rooms, on elevators, or in the area of drill floors, draw works, shakers, and mud pits.
( d ) The cable must be installed in accordance with Article 326 of NFPA 70 (incorporated by reference; see § 110.10-1 of this subchapter).
( e ) The side wall pressure on the cable must not exceed 1,000 pounds per foot of radius.
( f ) Equipment grounding conductors in the cable must be sized in accordance with Section 250.122 of NFPA 70. System grounding conductors must be of a cross-sectional area not less than that of the normal current carrying conductors of the cable. The metal sheath must be grounded but must not be used as a required grounding conductor.
( g ) On an offshore floating drilling and production facility, the cable may be used as interconnect cable between production modules and between fixed distribution panels within the production modules, except that interconnection between production and temporary drilling packages is prohibited. Also, the cable may be used within columns, provided that the columns are not subject to the conditions described in paragraph (c) of this section.
( h ) When the cable is used within a hazardous (classified) location, terminations or fittings must be listed, and must be appropriate, for the particular Type MC cable used and for the environment in which they are installed.
[CGD 94-108, 62 FR 23908, May 1, 1997, as amended by USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65199, Oct. 31, 2008; USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16364, Mar. 16, 2023]