alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                          PATINA OIL & GAS CORPORATION
                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
              FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, 1995 AND 1996
                      (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               1994      1995       1996
                                              -------  ---------  --------
<S>                                           <C>      <C>        <C>
PRIMARY NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE:
 
Net income (loss)                             $ 2,950   $(2,094)  $ 3,562
Dividends on preferred stock                        -         -    (2,129)
                                              -------   -------   -------
  Net income (loss) available to common       $ 2,950   $(2,094)  $ 1,433
                                              =======   =======   =======
 
Weighted average shares outstanding            14,000    14,000    17,787
Add common stock equivalents                        -         -         9
                                              -------   -------   -------
      Weighted average common stock and
           equivalents outstanding             14,000    14,000    17,796
 
Net income (loss) applicable to common        $  0.21   $ (0.15)    $0.08
                                              =======   =======   =======
 
FULLY DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE:
 
Net income (loss)                             $ 2,950   $(2,094)  $ 3,562
Dividends on preferred stock                        -         -         -
                                              -------   -------   -------
     Net income (loss) available to common    $ 2,950   $(2,094)  $ 3,562
                                              =======   =======   =======
 
Weighted average shares outstanding            14,000    14,000    17,787
Add common stock equivalents                        -         -         9
Other potentially dilutive securities               -         -     3,085
                                              -------   -------   -------
     Weighted average common stock
           and equivalents outstanding         14,000    14,000    20,881
 
Net income (loss) applicable to common        $  0.21   $ (0.15)    $0.17
                                              =======   =======   =======
</TABLE>

Note: Fully diluted net income (loss) per share for 1994, 1995 and 1996 are not
shown in the financial statements as the fully diluted net income (loss) per
share equaled primary earnings per share in 1994 and 1995 and the fully diluted
net income (loss) per share in 1996 was anti-dulutive.  Therefore, only primary
net income per share is disclosed in the financial statements.
EX-10.2



 








Exhibit 10.2




Description of Compensation of Directors




          During 2004, each director of CT Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) who is not employed by
the Company or its subsidiaries (a “non-employee director”) is paid an annual retainer of $12,000.
The annual retainer may be paid in the form of common stock issued under the Company’s 1996
Director Compensation Plan or the Company’s Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Incentive Plan.




          Each non-employee director receives $1,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors
attended. Committee chairmen are paid $600 per committee meeting attended and committee members
are paid $500 per committee meeting attended. For meetings of the Board of Directors by telephone
conference call, non-employee directors are paid $500 per call. For committee meetings by
telephone conference call, committee chairmen receive $300 per call and committee members are paid
$250 per call. Meeting attendance fees are paid in cash or common stock. New non-employee
directors are granted a one-time stock option with a value of $10,000 (based on Black Scholes).
Non-employee directors also receive an annual stock option grant with a value of $10,000 (based on
Black Scholes), which is fully vested on the date of grant. Non-employee directors are also paid
$500 in cash or common stock for each informational luncheon session attended, which informational
luncheons are not counted as meetings of the Board of Directors other than for purposes of
compensation.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

NANCY GUCWA,

and MARK MARUSZA,

Plaintiffs, 

Case No. 2:15-cv-10815-AJT-APP

v. 

Hon. Arthur J. Tarnow

DR. JEFFREY LAWLEY.

DR. HARVEY AGER,

DR. W. JOHN BAKER,

DR. BARRY RUBIN, and

ACCIDENT FUND INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF AMERICA,

 Defendants. 

==============================================================================

Marshall D. Lasser (P25573) Mark A. Hypnar (P32026)

Law Office of Marshall Lasser, P.C. Law Offices of Mark A. Hypnar, P.C.

P.O. Box 2579 P.O. Box 512

Southfield, MI 48037 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48303

(248) 647-7722 (248) 214-6644

Attorney for Plaintiffs Attorney for Defendant Baker 

mlasserlaw@aol.com mahypnar@aol.com

Joseph A. Fink (P13428)

Kathleen A. Lang (P34695)

Michelle L. Alamo (P60684)

Dickenson Wright PLLC

500 Woodward Avenue, Ste. 4000

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 223-3500

Attorneys for Defendant Accident Fund

jfink@dickensonwright.com

klang@dickensonwright.com

malamo@dickensonwright.com

==============================================================================

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME PERIOD 

WITHIN WHICH TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS, MOVE, 

OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

2:15-cv-10815-AJT-APP Doc # 12 Filed 03/27/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 159
2

This matter having come before this Court upon the stipulation of Plaintiffs Nancy 

Gucwa and Mark Marusza and Defendant W. John Baker, and the Court being otherwise fully 

advised in the premises:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties, that Defendant W. 

John Baker is granted an extension of time until April 24, 2015 to file responsive pleadings, 

move, or otherwise respond to the Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury, 

Trial Docket No. 2, in this cause.

SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 27, 2015 /S/ Arthur J. Tarnow__

Hon. Arthur J. Tarnow

Stipulated as to form and entry:

By: /S/ Marshall Lasser By: /S/ Mark A. Hypnar___

Marshall Lasser (P25573) Mark A. Hypnar (P3206)

Marshall Lasser, P.C. Law Offices of Mark A. Hypnar, P.C.

P.O. Box Box 2579 P.O. Box 512

Southfield, MI 48037 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48303

(248) 647-772 (248) 214-6644

mlasserlaw@aol.com mahypnar@aol.com

2:15-cv-10815-AJT-APP Doc # 12 Filed 03/27/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 160
DATED EXHIBIT NO: 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The  registrant  and each person whose  signature  appears below hereby  appoint
Harley  L.  Rollins,  as  attorneys-in-fact  with  full  power of  substitution,
severally,  to execute in the name and on behalf of the registrant and each such
person,  individually  and in each capacity stated below, one or more amendments
to the annual report which amendments may make such changes in the report as the
attorney-in-fact  acting in the premises deems  appropriate and to file any such
amendment to the report with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In  accordance  with the Exchange  Act, this report has been signed below by the
following  persons on behalf of the  registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

     Signature                           Title                      Date
     ---------                           -----                      ----

<S>                          <C>                                    <C>
/s/ HARLEY L. ROLLINS        President, Chief Executive Officer     March 28, 2003
----------------------       and Chief Financial Officer (principal
    Harley L. Rollins        executive officer and principal
                             financial and accounting
                             officer) and Director

/s/ CLINTON H. SNYDER        Director and Secretary                 March 28, 2003
------------------------
    Clinton H. Snyder

/s/ JOSEPH A GUZMAM          Director                               March 28, 2003
------------------------
    Joseph A. Guzman

/s/ RODNEY W. STURM          Director                               March 28, 2003
------------------------
    Rodney W. Sturm
</TABLE>
Argued and submitted October 30, 1995,

reversed and remanded January 3, 1996

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Roger L. Wolff, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Nendel's Management & Supply Co., *Petitioners, v.*Roger L. WOLFF, *Respondent.*

(WCB 93-06586; CA A86534)

908 P2d 854

James W. Moller, Special Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

James L. Edmunson and Martin L. Alvey filed the brief for respondent.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

RIGGS, P. J.

*395RIGGS, P. J.

Employer and SAIF seek review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, contending that the Board erred in holding that employer is barred from denying that claimant’s preexisting knee condition is compensable.

Relying *on Messmer v. Deluxe Cabinet Works,*130 Or App 254, 881 P2d 180 (1994), *rev den*320 Or 507 (1995), the Board ordered that employer is precluded from denying the compensability of claimant’s left knee osteochondritis dessicans, because, although it had never formally accepted that condition, it did not challenge a 1981 determination order that specifically listed osteochondritis as one of claimant’s conditions. In 1995, the legislature amended ORS 656.262. Subsection (10) now provides, in part:

> “Payment of permanent disability benefits pursuant to a determination order, notice of closure, reconsideration order or litigation order shall not preclude an insurer or self-insured employer from subsequently contesting the compen-sability of the condition rated therein, unless the condition has been formally accepted.”

As we held in *Volk v. America West Airlines,*135 Or App 565, 899 P2d 746 (1995), the 1995 amendments to the workers’ compensation statutes are applicable to all cases pending in administrative proceedings or on review. Accordingly, we reverse and remand this case to the Board for reconsideration in the light of the amendments.

Reversed and remanded.
§ 28.255 Bilge pumps, bilge piping, and dewatering systems. ( a ) Each vessel must be equipped with a bilge pump and bilge piping capable of draining any watertight compartment, other than tanks and small buoyancy compartments, under all service conditions. Large spaces, such as enginerooms must be fitted with more than one suction line.
( b ) In addition to the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, a space used in the sorting or processing of fish in which water is used must be fitted with dewatering system capable of dewatering the space under normal conditions of list and trim at the same rate as water is introduced. Pumps used as part of the processing of fish do not count for meeting this requirement. The dewatering system must be interlocked with the pump(s) supplying water to the space, so that in the event of failure of the dewatering system, the water supply is inactivated.
( c ) Except as provided by paragraph (f) of this section, each vessel 79 feet (24 meters) or more in length must be equipped with a fixed, self-priming, powered, bilge pump connected to a bilge manifold.
( d ) If a bilge pump required by paragraph (a) of this section is portable, it must be provided with a suitable suction hose of adequate length to reach the bilges of each watertight compartment it must serve and with a discharge hose of adequate length to ensure overboard discharge. A portable pump must be capable of dewatering each space it serves at a rate of at least 2 inches (51 millimeters) of water depth per minute.
( e ) Except for a fire pump required by § 28.315, a bilge pump may be used for other purposes.
( f ) Except where an individual pump is provided for a separate space or for a portable pump, each individual bilge suction line must be led to a manifold. Each bilge suction line must be provided with a stop valve at the manifold and a check valve at some accessible point in the bilge line to prevent unintended flooding of a space.
( g ) Each bilge suction line and dewatering system suction must be fitted with a suitable strainer to prevent clogging of the suction line. Strainers must have an open area of not less than three times the open area of the suction line.
( h ) Each vessel must comply with the oil pollution prevention requirements of 33 CFR parts 151 and 155.
0 Cl 

## ' 1-' 00 

# ' 1\:l 0 0**~** 

# §

0**~** 1\:l 0

.....,

### ~ 

# '**~ ~**  

### z 0 ...:( 1\:l 0**~** tl§;l 0 0 1\:l 

# Or-de.r

# ~u.""'be\: 

# ) 

# 4.2Sos

Hydrogen

Copper Cromite
Fatty Acid (Erucic) Hydrogenation Chamber



# I**Ligh~** Paraffins 

### I

Crude fatty from Tan 

# -

• Distillation Column 

### 1



# I C16 • C18

### ~Alcohols



# I HYDROGENATION

95%Aicohol 5% Crude Product Stream (wax ester; paraffin; Aldehydes)



### I C20-C22



## - 

## f-+ Alcohols
Distillation Column2 Depressurisation Chamber 

### 1



# DISTILLATION

I 

# .I I

Distillation Column3**~** 422 Alcohols+

# ~ 

# I Wax Esters Depressurisation Chamber2

C22-C24 

# I

Bottom 

# I Tank Farm

.. 1 Crude Fatty Alcohol Storage Tank 500m 3

Crude Fatty Alcohol Crude alcohol Storage Tank 400 ms for Distillation Step

Crude Fatty Alcohol Storage Tank 1500



### (v 

## I 1-' 00 

## ' 0 Cl 1\:l 0 0**~** 0**~** 1-'· c.>

# ~ +**~ ~**  1\:l c.> Cl aJ**~ ~** **~** 1\:l**~** 0

C/l 

### > til 0 I:"' 

# ;g 0**~** 

### c: 0 

## ..., til 

### >

### ~

### ~

### ~**~** 

# \

tl§;l 0 0 1\:l
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”),
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
      Rick
      Berry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      RICK
      BERRY


Rick
      Berry


Chief
      Financial Officer





November
      8, 2005





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. and will be retained by Sanders Morris Harris
      Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.







-47-
ACTIO N 

## Pettiford , MarieJOST ) SlO-110121-00 6 CO:-JTRO L N O 

## From : Sent : To : Cc : Subject : Chery l hayne s [cheryl.haynes@akics.org ] Thursday , Januar y20 , 201 1 9:3 3 P M LaHood
. Ray(OST ) Kurland , Susa n (OST) ; Devany , Denni s (OST) ; sean.parnell@alaska.gov ; marc.luiken@alaska.gov-commissione r Renewa l o f Alask a Airline s t o Provid e Essentia l Ai rService s i n Southeas t Alask a

JANUAR Y20 , 201 1 TH E HONORABL E RA YLAHOO D SECRETARY , U S DEP TO F TRANSPORTATIO N 120 0 NE W JERSE YAV E S E WASHINGTON , D.C

. 2059 0 RE : CONTRIBUTIO N O F ALASKAAIRLINES ' ESSENTIA L AI R SERVIC E A TCORDOVA , GUSTAVUS , PETERSBURG , WRANGELL , AN D YAKUTAT , AUSKA ; DOCKE TOST-1998-489 9 DEA R SECRETAR

YLAHOOD , THI S LETTE R I S T O EXPRES S STRON G SUPPOR TO F TH E ELECTIO N O F ALASKAAIRLINE S T O CONTINU E T O PROVID E ESSENTIA L AI R SERVIC E T O OU R COMMUNITY

. I N ADDITIO N T O TH E OBVIOU S NEED S O F AN YREMOT E COMMUNITY , AUSK AAIRLINE S BRING S TH E DRUG S W E NEE D O N ADAIL YBASI S FRO M SEATTLE

. AN YCU TI N SERVIC E O R REROUT E O R ALTERNAT E ROUTE S B YANOTHE R CARRIE R WIL L ABSOLUTELYAFFEC TTH E HEALTHCAR E I N OU R COMMUNITY

. 1 A M TH E PHARMACIS TA TALASK AISLAN D COMMUNIT YSERVICE S AN D SOMETIME S DELAYS , EVE N FO R 2 O R 3 DAYS , CA N B E CRUCIA L T O APATIENT
. ALASK A AIRLIN E FLIE S T O MAN YREMOT E AREA S RELIABLYAN D GREATLYENHANCE S OU R WELLBEIN G AN D QUALIT YO F LIFE
. THEI R WILLINGNES S T O PROVID E CARG O A S WEL L A S PASSENGE R SERVICE , THEI R ABILIT YT O ACCES S AIRPORT S DURIN G INCLEMNE TWEATHER—THE YAR E EQUIPPE D WIT H SPECIALIZE D TECHNOLOGY-ENABL E PRODUCT S AN D PEOPL E T O REAC H TH E COMMUNITY

. 1 RESPECTFULL

YURG E DO TT O SELECTALASK AAlRLINE s T O CONTINU E T O PROVID E ESSENTIA L AI R SERVIC E T O SOUTHEAS TALASKA , A S I THA S DON E FO R OVE R 3 0 YEARS

. SINCERELY , CHERY L HAYNES , RP H PO B 122 2 WRANGELL , A K9992 9 

## 907-874-500 5
#### § 308.536 Declaration where failure to comply with Clause 21 was inadvertent, Form MA-314.

An Assured that fails inadvertently to maintain a collateral deposit fund or surety bond in an amount sufficient to meet the requirements of Clause 21 of the Policy shall file this Declaration, Form MA-314, which may be obtained from MARAD's underwriting agent or MARAD.
§ 169.682 Distribution and circuit loads. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the connected load on a lighting branch circuit must not exceed 80 percent of the rating of the overcurrent protective device, computed using the greater of— ( 1 ) The lamp sizes to be installed; or
( 2 ) 50 watts per outlet.
( b ) Circuits supplying electrical discharge lamps must be computed using the ballast input current.
( c ) The branch circuit cables for motor and lighting loads must be no smaller than No. 14 AWG.
# C_2011269EN.01003201.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/32

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Lyon (France), lodged on 1 July 2011 — Receveur principal des douanes de Roissy Sud, Receveur principal de la recette des douanes de Lyon Aéroport, Direction régionale des douanes et droits indirects de Lyon, Administration des douanes et droits indirects v Société Rohm & Haas Electronic Materials CMP Europe GmbH, Rohm & Haas Europe s. à r.l., Société Rohm & Haas Europe Trading APS-UK Branch

(Case C-336/11)

2011/C 269/62

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Lyon

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Receveur principal des douanes de Roissy Sud, Receveur principal de la recette des douanes de Lyon Aéroport, Direction régionale des douanes et droits indirects de Lyon, Administration des douanes et droits indirects

Appellants:

Respondents: Société Rohm & Haas Electronic Materials CMP Europe GmbH, Rohm & Haas Europe s. à r.l., Société Rohm & Haas Europe Trading APS-UK Branch

Respondents:

Question referred

Question referred

Should the combined nomenclature [set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, (1) as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1549/2006 of 17 October 2006 (2) and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1214/2007 of 20 September 2007 (3)] be interpreted as meaning that polishing pads, intended for a polishing machine for working semiconductor materials — as such coming under tariff heading 8460 — imported separately from the machine, in the form of discs perforated in the centre, made up of a hard polyurethane layer, a layer of polyurethane foam, an adhesive layer and a protective plastic film, which do not contain any metal part or any abrasive substance and are used to polish ‘wafers’, in association with an abrasive liquid, and must be replaced at a frequency determined by their level of wear, come under tariff heading 8466 [...], as parts or accessories suitable for use solely or principally with the machines classified under headings 8456 to 8465, or, on the basis of their constituent material, under tariff heading [3919], as self-adhesive flat shapes made of plastic?

1

2

3

---

(1)  OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ 2006 L 301, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ 2007 L 286, p. 1.

3

---
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending December 24, 2005

----

Bank Holding CompaniesDeutsche Bank AG, Frankfurt, Germany, and Taunus Corporation, New York, New York  -- to engage in physical commodity trading activities on a limited basis as an activity that is complementary to a financial activity.					-Approved, December 19, 2005 					Penn Bancshares, Inc., Pennsville, New Jersey  -- to acquire up to 24.89 percent of the shares of Harvest Community Bank.					-Approved, December 19, 2005 					

CurrencyFederal Reserve Notes  -- new currency budget for 2006.					-Approved, December 19, 2005 					

EnforcementABN AMRO Bank N.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and its New York, New York, and Chicago, Illinois, Branches  -- interagency issuance of a consent cease and desist order and assessment of penalties.					-Announced, December 19, 2005 					County Bank, Merced, California  -- written agreement dated October 26, 2004, terminated December 15, 2005.					-Announced, December 21, 2005 					

FormsForms  -- final Board review to extend without revision the Recordkeeping and Disclosure Requirements Associated with Loans Secured by Real Estate Located in Flood Hazard Areas Pursuant to Section 208.25 of Regulation H (Reg H-2) and Recordkeeping, Reporting, and Disclosure Requirements Pursuant to the Community Reinvestment Act (Reg BB).					-Approved, December 19, 2005 					

Regulations And PoliciesNontraditional Mortgage Products  -- publication for comment of interagency guidance on residential mortgage products that allow borrowers to defer repayment of principal and sometimes interest (Docket No. OP-1246).					-Approved, December 19, 2005 					

Reserve Bank OperationsFederal Reserve Bank Budgets  -- operating and capital budgets for the Reserve Banks and Federal Reserve Information Technology, and operating budget for the Office of Employee Benefits for 2006.					-Approved, December 20, 2005 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: December 29, 2005