alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.29.1



 





Exhibit 10.29.1








	 	 	 
	

	 	January 1, 2005






David A. H. Lee, M.D., PhD.

100 Painters Drive

Chadds Ford, PA 19317



Dear David:




     Reference is hereby made to that certain amended and restated employment agreement, dated as
of September 1, 2002 (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”), between you and Endo Pharmaceuticals
Inc. (the “Company”). Terms used but not defined in this letter shall have the meanings ascribed
to them in the Employment Agreement.



     Pursuant to Section 2.2 of the Employment Agreement, the Company hereby informs you that it
wishes to renew the Employment Agreement for an additional period of one year. If you are in
agreement, the Employment Period shall now cease on December 31, 2005, unless otherwise modified in
accordance with the terms of the Employment Agreement.



     All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect. If you are in agreement with this renewal, which shall be effective as of the date first
above written, please execute below.



	 	 	 
	

	 	Sincerely,
	 
	 	 
	

	 	/s/ Carol A. Ammon
	 
	 	 
	

	 	Carol A. Ammon

Chairman & Chief Executive Officer






ACCEPTED AND AGREED THIS 21st DAY OF JANUARY 2005:




/s/ David A. H. Lee

David A. H. Lee, M.D., PhD.
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49223, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60144, Sept. 30, 2013.

§ 2.10-125 Fees for examination of foreign tankships. Each foreign tankship of a country party to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974 as amended, must pay: ( a ) For examination for the issuance of a Certificate of Compliance under § 2.01-6(a)(2)(i) of this part, or examination for the annual endorsement to a Certificate of Compliance, a fee of $1,100.
( b ) For examination for the issuance of a Tank Vessel Examination Letter under § 2.01-6(a)(3) of this part, a fee of $1,100.
[CGD 91-030, 60 FR 13563, Mar. 13, 1995, as amended by USCG-2010-0759, 75 FR 60001, Sept. 29, 2010]
# C_2012366EN.01003402.xml

| 24.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/34

---

Order of the General Court of 11 October 2012 — Cervelli v Commission

(Case T-622/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Civil service - Officials - Expatriation allowance - Request for review - New facts - Appeal manifestly unfounded)

2012/C 366/67

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Francesca Cervelli (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J. García-Gallardo Gil-Fournier, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and V. Joris, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 12 September 2011 in Case F-98/10 Cervelli v Commission, and seeking that that order be set aside.

Cervelli

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Ms Francesca Cervelli shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Francesca Cervelli shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

    Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of ComBanc, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Jason R. Thornell, VP/Controller of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

                  (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                        section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                        1934, as amended; and

                  (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                        in all material respects, the financial condition and
                        results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Jason R. Thornell
---------------------
Jason R. Thornell, VP/Controller

August 13, 2004

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

TAMMY L. IVISON, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-11925 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

KONDAUR CAPITAL CORP., et al., 

 Defendant. 

_________________________________/ 

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

 On May 8, 2015, Plaintiff Tammy Ivison (“Ivison”) filed a complaint against 

Kondaur Capital Corporation (“Kondaur”) challenging the validity of the 

foreclosure proceedings Kondaur initiated against her. (See ECF #1-2 at 7, Pg. ID 

19.) This Court issued an Order referring the parties to facilitation on July 28, 2015 

with the following instruction: “[T]he parties shall not serve discovery, responses 

to discovery, or disclosures, and shall not file any motions, responses to motions 

already filed, or responsive pleadings. Any upcoming court hearings or 

conferences are adjourned until further notice.” (ECF #7 at 2, Pg. ID 60.) 

2:15-cv-11925-MFL-RSW Doc # 11 Filed 09/22/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 72
 On September 10, 2015, Robert Wright, the facilitator in this case, informed 

the Court that the parties failed to reach a settlement. (See ECF #10 at 1, Pg. ID 

71.) In light of the parties’ failure to reach a settlement, the Court now orders 

Kondaur to file its response to Ivison’s complaint no later than October 13, 2015. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: September 22, 2015 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on September 22, 2015, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113

2:15-cv-11925-MFL-RSW Doc # 11 Filed 09/22/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 73
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7920
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TONY MAURICE HAIRSTON, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-92-85-R, CA-96-346-R) Submitted: January 27, 1998 Decided: May 19, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Alan G. Ellis, LAW OFFICES OF ALAN ELLIS, P.C., Sausalito, California, for Appellant. Joseph William Hooge Mott, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hairston , Nos. CR-92-85-R;CA-96-346-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 22, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 1 of 24 Pg ID 1
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 2 of 24 Pg ID 2
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 3 of 24 Pg ID 3
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 4 of 24 Pg ID 4
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 5 of 24 Pg ID 5
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 6 of 24 Pg ID 6
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 7 of 24 Pg ID 7
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 8 of 24 Pg ID 8
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 9 of 24 Pg ID 9
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 10 of 24 Pg ID 10
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 11 of 24 Pg ID 11
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 12 of 24 Pg ID 12
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 13 of 24 Pg ID 13
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 14 of 24 Pg ID 14
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 15 of 24 Pg ID 15
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 16 of 24 Pg ID 16
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 17 of 24 Pg ID 17
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 18 of 24 Pg ID 18
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 19 of 24 Pg ID 19
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 20 of 24 Pg ID 20
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 21 of 24 Pg ID 21
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 22 of 24 Pg ID 22
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 23 of 24 Pg ID 23
2:14-cv-14154-BAF-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 10/28/14 Pg 24 of 24 Pg ID 24
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                  AS ADDED BY
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Florida Business BancGroup, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, A. Bronson Thayer,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



Date:  May 6, 2003                        By: /s/ A. Bronson Thayer
       -------------                      -------------------------------------
                                          A. Bronson Thayer, Chairman and Chief
                                          Executive Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2473 

To improve Department of Defense policies relating to body armor. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2009 

Ms. TSONGAS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To improve Department of Defense policies relating to body 

armor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IMPROVEMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

4 POLICIES RELATING TO BODY ARMOR. 

5 (a) DEDICATED PROGRAM ELEMENT FOR BODY

6 ARMOR.—Effective for the budget of the President sub7 mitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of title 31, 

8 United States Code, for fiscal year 2011 and each fiscal 

9 year thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that 

10 within the research, development, test, and evaluation ac11 count for each of the military services a separate, dediVerDate Nov 24 2008 01:22 May 20, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2473.IH H2473

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2473 IH

1 cated program element is assigned to the research, devel2 opment, test, and evaluation of body armor. 

3 (b) DEDICATED PROGRAM ELEMENT FOR PROCURE4 MENT OF BODY ARMOR.—Effective for the budget of the 

5 President submitted to Congress under section 1105(a) of 

6 title 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2011 and each 

7 fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall en8 sure that within the procurement account for each of the 

9 military services a separate, a dedicated program element 

10 is assigned to the procurement of body armor. 

11 (c) RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF LIGHTER

12 BODY ARMOR.—Of the amounts authorized to be appro13 priated for research, development, test, and evaluation, the 

14 Secretary of Defense shall ensure that such sums as may 

15 be necessary are available for— 

16 (1) the research and development of lighter 

17 body armor while maintaining equivalent level of 

18 threat protection to the improved outer tactical vest 

19 and enhanced small arms protective inserts; and 

20 (2) the creation of a task force to carry out the 

21 research, development, test, and evaluation of lighter 

22 body armor. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 12 (Friday, January 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-230]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

January 8, 2007.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Thursday, January 18, 2007.

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the 
following in open session: Secretary of Labor v. San Juan Coal Company, 
Docket No. CENT 2004-212. (Issues include whether the Administrative 
Law Judge correctly determined that the operator's violation of 30 CFR 
75.400 was not caused by its unwarrantable failure to comply with the 
standard).
    Any person attending this oral argument who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean Ellen, (202) 434-9950/(202) 708-
9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Jean H. Ellen,
Chief Docket Clerk.
[FR Doc. 07-230 Filed 1-17-07; 11:46 am]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
#### § 32.55-15 Ventilation for hold spaces—TB/ALL.

Hold spaces containing independent cargo tanks shall be considered to be equivalent to cargo pumprooms and shall be ventilated and safeguarded as such.
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF JITNEY-JUNGLE STORES OF 
AMERICA, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
							     
							     Percentage 
							     of Voting
							     Securities
					   Jurisdiction of    Owned by 
Name                                        Incorporation    Registrant 
_____________________________________      _______________   __________

<S>                                           <C>               <C>
Interstate Jitney-Jungle Stores, Inc.         Alabama           100%
							   
Southern Jitney Jungle Company                Mississippi       100%

McCarty-Holman Co., Inc.                      Mississippi       100%

Jitney-Jungle Bakery, Inc.                    Mississippi       100%

Delchamps, Inc.                               Alabama           100%



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (File No. 333-21775) of our report dated February 7, 1997 on our audits
of the financial statements of ModaCAD, Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and for
each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1996, which is included
in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.


SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 27, 1997
# C_2011340EN.01003101.xml

| 19.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/31

---

Action brought on 27 September 2011 — Hartmann v OHIM — Protecsom (DIGNITUDE)

(Case T-504/11)

2011/C 340/60

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Paul Hartmann AG (Heidenheim an der Brenz, Germany) (represented by: N. Aicher, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Protecsom SAS (Valognes, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 July 2011 in case R 1197/2010-4; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 July 2011 in case R 1197/2010-4; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘DIGNITUDE’, for goods in classes 5, 24 and 25 — Community trade mark application No 7506025

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 7436603, of the word mark ‘Dignity’, for goods in class 5; German trade mark registration No 302008076849.5/05, of the word mark ‘Dignity’, for goods in classes 5 and 10

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Partially rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal made an incorrect assessment of the likelihood of confusion, in particular of the similarity of the goods.

Pleas in law:

---
#### § 201.79 Motions.

All motions and requests for rulings shall state the relief sought, the authority relied upon, and the facts alleged. If made before or after the hearing, such motions shall be in writing. If made at the hearing, they may be stated orally: *Provided, however,* That the presiding officer may require that such motion be reduced to writing and filed and served in the same manner as a formal motion. Answers to formal motions shall comply with the requirements of § 201.80. Motions and answers thereto shall be addressed to the presiding officer if the case is pending before such officer. Oral argument upon a written motion in which an answer has been filed may be granted within the discretion of the Administration or the presiding officer, as the case may be. A repetitious motion will not be entertained.
#### § 185.606 Escape hatches and emergency exits.

All escape hatches and other emergency exits used as means of escape must be marked on both sides in clearly legible letters at least 50 millimeters (2 inches) high: “EMERGENCY EXIT, KEEP CLEAR”, unless such markings are deemed unnecessary by the cognizant OCMI.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE LION
BREWERY, INC.'S BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,992
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,001
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (157)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,128
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,311
<PP&E>                                           3,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,684
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,885
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            39
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,581
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,954
<SALES>                                         26,439
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,439
<CGS>                                           19,939
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,939
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,437
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 520
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,543
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,125
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,418
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    322
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,096
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
        

</TABLE>