alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 35.01-55 Pilot boarding operation. ( a ) The master shall ensure that pilot boarding equipment is maintained as follows: ( 1 ) The equipment must be kept clean and in good working order.
( 2 ) Each damaged step or spreader step on a pilot ladder must be replaced in kind with an approved replacement step or spreader step, prior to further use of the ladder. The replacement step or spreader step must be secured by the method used in the original construction of the ladder, and in accordance with manufacturer instructions.
( b ) The master shall ensure compliance with the following during pilot boarding operations: ( 1 ) Only approved pilot boarding equipment may be used.
( 2 ) The pilot boarding equipment must rest firmly against the hull of the vessel and be clear of overboard discharges.
( 3 ) Two man ropes, a safety line and an approved lifebuoy with an approved water light must be at the point of access and be immediately available for use during boarding operations.
( 4 ) Rigging of the equipment and embarkation/debarkation of a pilot must be supervised in person by a deck officer.
( 5 ) Both the equipment over the side and the point of access must be adequately lit during night operations.
( 6 ) If a pilot hoist is used, a pilot ladder must be kept on deck adjacent to the hoist and available for immediate use.
[CGD 79-032, 49 FR 25455, June 21, 1984]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending June 16, 2007

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 30, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00721

- CV

Rufina Reyes YANEZ

, Appellant

v.

AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

, Appellee

From the 341st Jud icial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CVK001146D3 Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The appellant’s brief was originally due February 14, 2020. This court has granted appellant several extensions to file the appellant’s brief. Our order on the appellant’s last mo tion advised counsel that no further extensions would be granted without a timely motion that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) p rovides the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline.

Appellant’s motion states counsel is self

- quarantined after being exposed to COVID

- 19. Although the motion demonstrates extraordinary c ircumstances, the motion fails to advise the court of counsel’s efforts to complete appellant’s brief, and to reasonably assure the court the brief will be completed by the requested extended deadline given counsel’s circumstances.

Appellant’s motion al so fails to contain a certificate of conference stating “the filing party conferred, or made a reasonable attempt to confer, with all other parties about the merits of the motion and whether those parties oppose the motion” and to identify “the number of p revious extensions granted regarding the item in question.” See Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.5(b)(1).

W e therefore take no action on appellant’s motion at this time. Instead, we ORDER appellant to file a supplemental or amended motion satisfying the a bove

- mentioned requirements within 10 days of this order._______________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 30th day of April, 2020

.

______________________ M ichael A. C ruz
, Clerk of Court
#### Josephine Sahler *v.*Jennie L. Williams, Executrix.

Motion to correct order denied, without costs.

Smith, P. J., not sitting.
Exhibit 15.1
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING


FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-12458, and 333-140809 on Form S-8 and Nos. 333-161781, on Form F-3, of our report, dated March 25, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Cimatron Ltd. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2009, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009.
  Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co.Certified Public AccountantsA member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu


Tel Aviv, Israel





June 28, 2010
I • I I 1



### .SERVED: August 14, 2015

..... i U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC

---------- IN THE MATTER OF LEARJET INC. DocketNo. FAA-2014- 0113


### ORDEROF DISMISSAL r·,

The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "FAA") tiled a Complaintdated March 24, 2014. Learjet Inc. (hereinafter "Learjet") filed a Request for Hearing dated March 17, 2014 and its Answer dated April 22, 2014. Learjetfiled a withdrawal ofRequest for Hearing dated January 15, 2015. 14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before orduring a hearing, an agency attorney may withdraw acomplaintorparty may withdraw a request for a hearing without the consent ofthe administrative lawjudge. Ifan agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice.'' WHEREFORE, Learjet having withdrawn its Request for Hearing, 

### it be and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Learjet's request to withdraw its Request for Hearingbe and is hereby granted; and 2. This proceedingbe and is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative LawJudge Attachment- Service List

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WI000 1

**0Nf1~** COPY Mr. Ralph Acs, Vice President & General Manager Learjet, Inc., 

### Respondent P.O. Box 7707 Wichita, KS 67277-7707 TEL: NOT PROVIDED FAX: NOT PROVIDED
BrendaR. Mesker, Director ofLegal Services Learjet, Inc. One Lear:jet Way Wichita, KS 67209 TEL: NOT PROVIDED FAX: NOT PROVIDED Kenneth P. Quinn, Esquire,

### Re,\pondent 's Counsel Pillsbury Winthrop ShawPittman 2300 N Street, NW Washington, DC 20037-1122 TEL: 202-663-8000 FAX: 202-663-8007
David Kessler, 

### Complainant's Counsel Federal AviationAdministration 901 Locust, Room 506 Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 · TEL: 816-329-3763 FAX: 816-329-3771 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0113 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building--Suite 2WIOOO. Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk. AGC-430.
2The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StcdiAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536

3
From: "Neil P. Reiff" <reiff@sandlerreiff.com> 

To: "DKodlsh@fec.gov" <DKodish@fec.gov>, 

Cc: "LWelss.vdp@gmail.com" <LWeiss.vdp@gmail.com>, "nburgess@fec.gov" <nburgess@fec.gov> 

Date: 11/19/2013 09:47 AM 

Subject: RE: Vermont Democratic Party 

Correct 

Sent from my Galaxy S®I11 

Original message 

From: DKodish@fec.gov 

Date: 11/19/2013 7:52 AM (GMT-05:00) 

To: "Neil P. Reiff <reiff(gsandlerreiff.com> 

Cc: LWeiss.vdp@gmail.com,nburgess@fec.gov 

Subject: RE: Vermont Democratic Party 

Hi Neil, thanks for your response. I assume your response means that VDP is waiving their right to a 

hearing in the matters presented in the Draft Final Audit Report? 

Douglas A. Kodish, CPA, CFE 

Supervisory Auditor 

Federal Election Commission 

999 E Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20463 

(202) 694-1209 

From: "Neil P. Reiff' <reiff@sandlerreiff.com> 

To: "nburge8s@fec.gov" <nburgess@fec.gov>, "LWeiss.vdp@gmail.com" <LWeiss.vdp@gmail.com>, 

Cc: "DKodlsh@fec.gov" <DKodlsh@fec.gov> 

Date: 11/13/2013 03:35 PM 

Subject: RE: Vermont Democratic Party 

Thanks, the DFAR is self-explanatory and we do not intend to provide any additional response. 

Neil P. Reiff 

Sandler, Reiff,Young & Lamb, P.C. 

1025 Vermont Ave, NW 
Suite 300 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

w. (202)479 - 1111 

f. (202)479 - 1115 

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may 

contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure. If the reader of this 

message is not the intended recipient or any employee or agent responsible for delivering the message 

to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of 

this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please 

notify us immediately by email. Thank you for your cooperation. 

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you 

that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not 

intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the 

Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction 

or matter addressed herein
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 95 (Thursday, May 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2442]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Initial Review Group, Health Services and Behavioral 
Research Review Subcommittee.
    Date: June 27-28, 2007.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Doubletree Hotel & Executive Meeting Center, Bethesda, 
MD.
    Contact Person: Lorraine Gunzerath, PhD, MBA, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 
Office of Extramural Activities, Extramural Project Review Branch, 
5635 Fishers Lane, Room 3043, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, 301-443-2369, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91fdf6e4ffebf4e3f0d1fcf0f8fdbffff8f9bff6fee7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="80ece7f5eefae5f2e1c0ede1e9ecaeeee9e8aee7eff6">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 11, 2007
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2442 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Friday, May 11, 2007.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

Surveillance Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-1958 Filed 4-16-07; 4:11 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
# C_2015294EN.01000201.xml

| 7.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 July 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Sicilia — Italy) — Davide Gullotta, Farmacia di Gullotta Davide & C. Sas v Ministero della Salute, Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale di Catania

(Case C-497/12) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 49 TFEU, 102 TFEU and 106 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Principle of non-discrimination - Abuse of dominant position - Article 15 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Inadmissibility))

(2015/C 294/02)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Sicilia

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Davide Gullotta, Farmacia di Gullotta Davide & C. Sas

Applicants:

Defendants: Ministero della Salute, Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale di Catania

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The questions referred by the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Sicilia (Italy), by decision of 9 October 2012, and maintained by that court, are inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7453

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTHONY BRYAN, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Elizabeth V. Hallanan, Senior District Judge. (CR-96-76, CA-97-1113-5) Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 26, 1999 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Bryan, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Anthony Bryan seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion agreeing with the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Bryan , Nos. CR-96-76; CA-97- 1113-5 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 23. 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
CHECKLIST r C ( 

CHARACTERISTICS t 

FEDERAL REQUIREMENT, RCRA CITE STATE AUTHORITY IF DIFFERENT FROM FEDERAL 

STATUTE REGULATION REQUIREMENT EXPLAIN 

SUBPART C - CHARACTERISTICS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
 

CHARACTERI STIC OF IGNITABI LITY , "liquid/flash point less 

than 60°C. 261.21 a)(1) -090(5)(a)(1) 

non-liquid/burns under 

(5) (a) (1i) standaid temperature - and" pre ssure 261. 21 (a) ( 2 

ianitable comoressed'oasI261.i1(a)· (5)(a)(i11) 

C5 ). ( a) ( i v ) oxidizer 261.21(2)(4

1.( 5) (b) EPA number 0001 261.21(b) 

CHRACTERISTIC OF CORROSIVITY
 

aoueous/oh < 2 or > 12.51 261. 22(a (1) (6)(a)(1) 

"" '. 1 (6)(a)(1i) (·>C_" 1.1guid/corrodes steel I 261.22(a)(2) " 

EPA number 0002 I251.22(b) ]~(-6-)(-b~)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

CHARACTERISTIC OF REACTIVITY
 

(7) (a) (i) unstable/violent chanoe 261.23(a) 1) 

reacts violently (7) (a) (ii) with weter 1261.23 a) 2) 

(7)(a)(iii) otent1011 261.23(a)(3) 

(7) (a) (iv) aenerates toxic ases 261.23(a)(4)1
 

cyanide or s'ulfide bear-\ I
 (7) (a) (v)

1nq/oenerates toxicoases 261.23(a)(5) 

detonat~on/expios1on, I (7 )( a) (vi)
 ; f heated 1261. 23(a)(6)
 

detonation/explosion (7) ( a) (vi.1 ) ,at'STP 261.23(2)(7) 

forbidden ex losive 261.23(a)(8), (7)(a)(viii)

EPA number 0003 251. 23(b) I (7)(b)

CHARACTERISTIC OF EP'TOXICITY 

test critieria and 

waste list 261.24(a) (8) (a) & (c) 

EPA numbers 261.24(b (8) (b) & (c') 

( 

'­

A-14
#### Egbert Seymour and James H. Noe, *Appellants, v.*Everard D. Benjamin and William H. Benjamin, *Respondents.*Robert F. Austin and others, *Appellants, v.*The Same, *Respondents*.

Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements of one appeal.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending March 31, 2007

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|FIFTH THIRD BANK  | * Branch       | Fifth Third Bank, Grand Rapids, MI to establish a branch at 3244 East Colonial Drive, Orlando, FL. | Newspaper:04/05/2007Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 04/05/2007    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

NAKISHA BLAKELY, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-11669 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

CHIMKO AND ASSOCIATES, P.C., 

 Defendant. 

_________________________________/ 

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

 Plaintiff Nakisha Blakely (“Plaintiff”) has brought an action against Defendant 

Chimko and Associates, P.C. (“Chimko”) alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection 

Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (See Compl., ECF #1 at ¶ 2, Pg. ID 1.) On 

February 4, 2016, the Court entered a stipulated order (the “February 4 Order”) granting 

the motion by Plaintiff’s prior counsel to withdraw and providing that “if no appearance 

by an attorney is filed on behalf of Plaintiff within 45 days of the date of service, this 

matter will be subject to dismissal without further action required by Defendant.” (See

ECF #14 at 2, Pg. ID 41.) 

To date, no attorney has filed an appearance on behalf of Plaintiff and more than 

45 days have lapsed since the February 4 Order’s date of service. Accordingly, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: April 1, 2016 

2:15-cv-11669-MFL-DRG Doc # 16 Filed 04/01/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 46
2

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on April 1, 2016, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113 

2:15-cv-11669-MFL-DRG Doc # 16 Filed 04/01/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 47
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4461

_____________________________

DEBBIE A. HALL,

Appellant,

v.

CARROLL FULMER LOGISTICS 

CORPORATION; and MOSES 

BRYANT,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County.

Don H. Lester, Judge.

December 3, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Nicholas Martino of Martino Legal, LLC, Jacksonville, for 

Appellant.

Peter E. Nicandri, W. Braxton Gillam, and John C. W. Cherneski 

of Milam Howard Nicandri Gillam & Renner, P.A., Jacksonville; 

D. Scott Craig of Law Office of D. Scott Craig, LLC, Jacksonville; 

and Ellis W. Peetluk of Peetluk Law Firm, P.A., Jacksonville, for 

Appellees.