Instructionsfor Developing Industry-specific Impacts for Heat Exchange Systems

Step 1. Revise the labor rates for the specific industry, if desired. The heat exchange system impacts model includes l

manufacturing industry sector (2-digit NAICS code 31 to 33) in the “labor rates” sheet within the impacts model. Indu

Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) (U.S. DOL, 2010) for specific NAICS codes. For the NAICS code associated with the spec

the specified SOC Code Numbers specified in the model can be found and entered into the spreadsheet. The new valu

sheet “labor rates”). If desired, the fringe benefits loading factor and overhead and profit rate can be adjusted in the 

Step 2. Determine the number of heat exchange systems per facility for which to estimate facility costs (per heat exch

in the “Cost by monitoring method” sheet. As discussed previously, the cost per heat exchange system is a function of 

need to be monitored at a specific facility. The number of heat exchange systems should be entered in the yellow

sheet. There are five monitoring frequencies evaluated in the macro: four periodic frequencies specified in the green 

monitoring method” sheet and a continuous monitoring option. If desired, the periodic monitoring frequencies in Cel

monitoring frequencies than those pre-loaded in the spreadsheet. In general, no other edits should be made to this s

“Generate Control_Options Costs” button to automatically calculate an array of costs for different monitoring frequen

“Control_Options” sheet. 

Step 3 (Optional). Review the table starting at Cell B9 in the “Control_Options” sheet. After running the “Generate C

control options (monitoring frequencies) will be generated and stored in this table. The “Control_Options” sheet also 

the “Control_Options” sheet are used in the “Cost by HEsize” sheet for projecting the impacts per model heat exchang

subsequent rows in the “Control_Options” sheet to store costs for previously evaluated sets of runs. One advantage o

several cost tables are already developed and stored in this sheet; however, with the macro, these costs can be easily 

unnecessary. 

Step 4. The next step in the process is to evaluate the specific options in the “Cost by HEsize” sheet. There is a drop d

frequency in Row 10, and yellow-highlighted input selections for the leak definition (in terms of water concentration), 

factor (“Reduct_Factor”), fraction of leaks that below the delay-of-repair threshold that are delayed (“Fr_Delayed”), a

Step 4. The next step in the process is to evaluate the specific options in the “Cost by HEsize” sheet. There is a drop d

frequency in Row 10, and yellow-highlighted input selections for the leak definition (in terms of water concentration), 

factor (“Reduct_Factor”), fraction of leaks that below the delay-of-repair threshold that are delayed (“Fr_Delayed”), a

are summarized on a per heat exchange system level for four different model heat exchange system water circulation 

110,000 gpm. The macro “Generate Impact Results Summary” allows the evaluation of using modified El Paso monito

“Control_Options” table. These results will be in the placed in the “Results_temp” sheet. The macro will automaticall

copied into one of the three “Results_#” sheets (where # = 1, 2, or 3). The “Results_#” sheets are used to save the spe

selected range from the “Results_temp” sheet would be copied to Cell B1, I1, P1, or W1 in one of the “Results_#” shee

Step 5. Repeat Step 4 as needed for different model run evaluations for a given model plant (i.e., a given number of h

sheet is designed to hold results for 4 different model runs. The model runs in a given sheet can be used to evaluate t

different model assumptions (e.g., different leak reduction factors or differences in fraction of leaks for which delay of 

results of the different model runs for each of the four model heat exchange systems (see Rows 77-98). It is anticipate

the yellow highlighted in Cells D11:G13 of the “Cost by HEsize” sheet. The results output by the macro will include the

systems per facility) for documentation of the run results. The results summary does not store the initial leak distribu

the “Cost by HEsize” sheet). If the initial leak distribution is varied across these runs, the leak distribution should also

Step 6. Repeat Steps 2 through 5 as needed for different model plants (i.e., to develop impacts for different numbers 

that the impacts for a specific industry may entail developing costs for a variety of model plant sizes or complexities, w

different numbers of heat exchange systems. For example, evaluation of three different model facilities may be desire

facility with one heat exchange system to be monitored; a moderately complex facility with two heat exchange system

exchange systems to be monitored. Steps 2 through 5 would have to be repeated of each of these model plants. The 

house impact results for three different model plants, with each sheet representing the results for a given model plant

sheet to house the results for a specific set of model inputs (leak definition and repair threshold), and use the four col

If this second option is used, the graphs included in the “Results_#” sheets at Row 80 will be meaningless, but it may b
If this second option is used, the graphs included in the “Results_#” sheets at Row 80 will be meaningless, but it may b

“NW_Impacts” sheet for calculation of nationwide impacts.

Step 7. Assign a nationwide number of heat exchange systems that can be represented by each model heat exchange 

emission reductions presented are per heat exchange system. By multiplying the costs and emission reductions by the 

impacts are developed for the source category. The “NW_Impacts” sheet provides a means to calculate the number o

heat exchange system / model plant combination for up to four model plants. The inputs needed for these calculation

the source category and the relative distribution of heat exchange systems by size and model plant. Note: the numbe

each model plant combination is rounded to whole numbers for the impact calculations, so there may be a slight diffe

Cell F32 and the total number of heat exchange system input in Cell G5 due to rounding.

Step 8. Identify the specific control options for evaluation to calculate the nationwide impacts and enter those results 

previously, if a single sheet contains output for the different model plants, it may expedite the manual process of tran

(but the graphs in the “Results_#” sheets will be of little value). Once the impacts for the selected control options are 

the sheet will automatically calculate the nationwide impacts in the final results table.

If additional edits to the costing assumptions are deemed necessary (i.e., hours required for training, reporting, or oth

the “Generate Control_Option Costs” macro. The password to unlock the "Cost by monitoring method" and "Cost_by
mpacts model includes labor rates (in May 2009 dollars) for general 

he impacts model. Industry-specific labor rates are available from the 

 associated with the specific source category, the mean hourly labor rates for 

readsheet. The new values should be entered in shaded cells (Cells I3 to I7 of 

e can be adjusted in the corresponding cells in columns C and D. 

cility costs (per heat exchange system). The monitoring costs are calculated 

ge system is a function of the number of heat exchange systems that will 

entered in the yellow-highlighted Cell I9 in the “Cost by monitoring method” 

es specified in the green highlighted cells (Cells R9 to R12) in the “Cost by 

toring frequencies in Cells R9 to R12 can be adjusted to evaluate different 

should be made to this sheet. Run the macro provided by pushing the 

rent monitoring frequencies and store the results for further use in the 

running the “Generate Control_Options Costs” macro, costs for the various 

trol_Options” sheet also houses the repair cost estimates. The top 30 rows of 

 per model heat exchange system. If you choose to do so, you can use 

of runs. One advantage of using the general manufacturing labor rates is that 

hese costs can be easily and quickly updated, so most users will find this step 

 sheet. There is a drop down selection for the monitoring method and 

of water concentration), delay of leak threshold concentration, leak reduction 

elayed (“Fr_Delayed”), and the VOC credit. The results of the model analysis 

 sheet. There is a drop down selection for the monitoring method and 

of water concentration), delay of leak threshold concentration, leak reduction 

elayed (“Fr_Delayed”), and the VOC credit. The results of the model analysis 

system water circulation sizes: 5,000 gpm; 15,000 gpm; 40,000 gpm; and 

modified El Paso monitoring at all frequencies included in the current 

e macro will automatically highlight the results range which can then be 

 are used to save the specific model run results for further analysis. The 

e of the “Results_#” sheets as appropriate.

, a given number of heat exchange systems at a facility). Each “Results_#” 

an be used to evaluate the effect of different leak definitions or the impact of 

f leaks for which delay of repair is used). Graphs are provided to illustrate the 

98). It is anticipated that the results for any given sheet will only alter 

he macro will include these inputs (along with the number of heat exchange 

e the initial leak distribution (i.e., the yellow highlighted in Cells M11:M16 of 

distribution should also be saved to document these inputs as well.

ts for different numbers of heat exchange systems per facility). It is likely 

t sizes or complexities, which may require costs to be evaluated for several 

el facilities may be desired for different facility complexities: a simple model 

wo heat exchange systems to be monitored; a complex facility with four heat 

these model plants. The three “Results_#” sheets were originally designed to 

s for a given model plant. However, you could alternatively use one results 

old), and use the four columns to house the results for different model plants. 

meaningless, but it may be easier to quickly copy the selected results to the 
meaningless, but it may be easier to quickly copy the selected results to the 

ch model heat exchange system / model plant combination. The costs and 

mission reductions by the number of heat exchange systems, nationwide 

o calculate the number of heat exchange systems represented by each model 

ded for these calculations are the total number of heat exchange systems in 

 plant. Note: the number of the number of heat exchange systems used for 

ere may be a slight difference in the number of heat exchangers calculated in 

s and enter those results in the “NW_Impacts” sheet (see Cell J32). As noted 

e manual process of transferring selected results to the “NW_Impacts” sheet 

cted control options are entered (or copied) into the “NW_Impacts” sheet, 

raining, reporting, or other elements), these should be made prior to running 

g method" and "Cost_by_HEsize" sheets is: "epa".
Nationwide Impact Summary Sheet

Input Parameters Section

Enter appropriate values in the yellow highlighted cells

1) Number of Impacted Heat Exchange Systems Nationwide: 100

2) Distribution of Model Heat Exchange System by Size

Water Flow 

Rate (gpm)

Fraction HE 

systems of 

this size

 5,000 0.2000

 15,000 0.3000

 40,000 0.3000

 100,000 0.2000

Sum Check: 1.0000 (value should equal 1.0000)

3) Distribution of Model Plants

Model Plant 

Number

Fraction 

facilities 

represented 

by this model 

plant

No. of HE 

systems for 

this model 

plant

Intermed. 

Calc. for 

Wt. Factor

Wtd. 

Average HE 

Systems by

Model Plant

1 0.4500 1 0.45 0.2195

2 0.3000 2 0.60 0.2927

3 0.2500 4 1.00 0.4878

4 - 6 - -

 2.05

Sum Check: 1.0000 (value should equal 1.0000)

3) Number of HE Systems for each of Model HE Size and Model Plant

Water Flow 

Rate (gpm) 1 2 3 4

 5,000 4 6 10 0

 15,000 7 9 15 0

 40,000 7 9 15 0

 100,000 4 6 10 0

Total Number of HES (rounded) 102

Model Plant Number


Output Summary Section

Final results table

Control 

Option Option Description TCI ($)

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits ($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

BL Baseline

1 80 ppbw, monthly $ 836,282 $ 549,253 $ 43,593 1,011 $ 43

2 40 ppbw, quarterly $ 323,832 $ 368,813 $ (144,314) 1,026 $ (141)

3 40 ppbw, monthly $ 836,282 $ 589,765 $ 55,142 1,069 $ 52

4 40 ppbw, continuous $ 2,583,407 $ 1,663,430 $ 1,118,073 1,091 $ 1,025

Copy the results for specific options in the designated areas below:

Control Option 1 Results

Model Plant 1

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($)

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 16,895 $ 7,738 $ 7,074 1.33 $ 5,323

 15,000 $ 16,895 $ 7,738 $ 5,745 3.99 $ 1,441

 40,000 $ 16,895 $ 7,738 $ 2,423 10.63 $ 228

100,000 $ 16,895 $ 7,738 $ (5,551) 26.58 $ (209)

Control Option 2 Results

Model Plant 1

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($)

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 3,045 $ 4,853 $ 4,179 1.35 $ 3,099
 15,000 $ 3,045 $ 4,853 $ 2,831 4.05 $ 700

 40,000 $ 3,045 $ 4,853 $ (541) 10.79 $ (50)

100,000 $ 3,045 $ 4,853 $ (8,632) 26.97 $ (320)

Control Option 3 Results

Model Plant 1

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($)

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 16,895 $ 8,136 $ 7,433 1.41 $ 5,290

 15,000 $ 16,895 $ 8,136 $ 6,028 4.22 $ 1,430

 40,000 $ 16,895 $ 8,136 $ 2,515 11.24 $ 224

100,000 $ 16,895 $ 8,136 $ (5,915) 28.10 $ (210)

Control Option 4 Results

Model Plant 1

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($)

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 26,895 $ 16,923 $ 16,206 1.43 $ 11,307

 15,000 $ 26,895 $ 16,923 $ 14,773 4.30 $ 3,436

 40,000 $ 26,895 $ 16,923 $ 11,190 11.47 $ 976

100,000 $ 26,895 $ 16,923 $ 2,590 28.67 $ 90

Intermediate Calculations - Do Not Alter

Option 1

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($)

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 160,499 $ 106,755 $ 93,466 27 $ 3,517

 15,000 $ 257,642 $ 167,871 $ 106,076 124 $ 858

 40,000 $ 257,642 $ 167,871 $ 3,083 330 $ 9

100,000 $ 160,499 $ 106,755 $ (159,032) 532 $ (299)

Totals $ 836,282 $ 549,253 $ 43,593 1,011 $ 43

Option 2
Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($)

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 63,549 $ 71,821 $ 58,336 27 $ 2,163

 15,000 $ 98,367 $ 112,585 $ 49,877 125 $ 398

 40,000 $ 98,367 $ 112,585 $ (54,636) 334 $ (163)

100,000 $ 63,549 $ 71,821 $ (197,891) 539 $ (367)

Totals $ 323,832 $ 368,813 $ (144,314) 1,026 $ (141)

Option 3

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($)

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 160,499 $ 114,699 $ 100,648 28 $ 3,582

 15,000 $ 257,642 $ 180,184 $ 114,849 131 $ 879

 40,000 $ 257,642 $ 180,184 $ 5,957 348 $ 17

100,000 $ 160,499 $ 114,699 $ (166,312) 562 $ (296)

Totals $ 836,282 $ 589,765 $ 55,142 1,069 $ 52

Option 4

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($)

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 505,924 $ 325,917 $ 311,584 29 $ 10,870

 15,000 $ 785,780 $ 505,798 $ 439,151 133 $ 3,295

 40,000 $ 785,780 $ 505,798 $ 328,074 355 $ 923

100,000 $ 505,924 $ 325,917 $ 39,264 573 $ 68

Totals $ 2,583,407 $ 1,663,430 $ 1,118,073 1,091 $ 1,025
Incremental 

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

$ 43

$ (12,582)

$ 4,639

$ 49,515

Model Plant 2 Model Plant 3

Model Size 

(gpm) TCI ($)

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits ($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

CostEffect 

($/tons)

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($)

 5 $ 8,447 $ 5,452 $ 4,788 1.33 $ 3,603 5,000 $ 4,224

 15,000 $ 8,447 $ 5,452 $ 3,459 3.99 $ 868 15,000 $ 4,224

 40,000 $ 8,447 $ 5,452 $ 136 10.63 $ 13 40,000 $ 4,224

 100,000 $ 8,447 $ 5,452 $ (7,837) 26.58 $ (295) 100,000 $ 4,224

Model Plant 2 Model Plant 3

Model Size 

(gpm) TCI ($)

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits ($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

CostEffect 

($/tons)

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($)

 5 $ 1,522 $ 3,512 $ 2,838 1.35 $ 2,104 5,000 $ 4,224
 15,000 $ 1,522 $ 3,512 $ 1,489 4.05 $ 368 15,000 $ 4,224

 40,000 $ 1,522 $ 3,512 $ (1,882) 10.79 $ (174) 40,000 $ 4,224

 100,000 $ 1,522 $ 3,512 $ (9,973) 26.97 $ (370) 100,000 $ 4,224

Model Plant 2 Model Plant 3

Model Size 

(gpm) TCI ($)

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits ($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

CostEffect 

($/tons)

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($)

 5 $ 8,447 $ 5,849 $ 5,147 1.41 $ 3,663 5,000 $ 4,224

 15,000 $ 8,447 $ 5,849 $ 3,742 4.22 $ 888 15,000 $ 4,224

 40,000 $ 8,447 $ 5,849 $ 229 11.24 $ 20 40,000 $ 4,224

 100,000 $ 8,447 $ 5,849 $ (8,201) 28.10 $ (292) 100,000 $ 4,224

Model Plant 2 Model Plant 3

Model Size 

(gpm) TCI ($)

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits ($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

CostEffect 

($/tons)

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($)

 5 $ 25,372 $ 16,326 $ 15,609 1.43 $ 10,891 5,000 $ 24,611

 15,000 $ 25,372 $ 16,326 $ 14,176 4.30 $ 3,297 15,000 $ 24,611

 40,000 $ 25,372 $ 16,326 $ 10,593 11.47 $ 924 40,000 $ 24,611

 100,000 $ 25,372 $ 16,326 $ 1,993 28.67 $ 70 100,000 $ 24,611

Model Plant 4

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits ($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

CostEffect 

($/tons)

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($)

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recover

y credits 

($/yr)

$ 4,309 $ 3,644 1.33 $ 2,742 5,000 $ 4,224 $ 4,309 $ 3,644

$ 4,309 $ 2,315 3.99 $ 581 15,000 $ 4,224 $ 4,309 $ 2,315

$ 4,309 $ (1,007) 10.63 $ (95) 40,000 $ 4,224 $ 4,309 $ (1,007)

$ 4,309 $ (8,980) 26.58 $ (338) 100,000 $ 4,224 $ 4,309 $ (8,980)

Model Plant 4

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits ($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

CostEffect 

($/tons)

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($)

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recover

y credits 

($/yr)

$ 3,134 $ 2,459 1.35 $ 1,824 5,000 $ 4,224 $ 3,134 $ 2,459
$ 3,134 $ 1,111 4.05 $ 275 15,000 $ 4,224 $ 3,134 $ 1,111

$ 3,134 $ (2,261) 10.79 $ (210) 40,000 $ 4,224 $ 3,134 $ (2,261)

$ 3,134 $ (10,352) 26.97 $ (384) 100,000 $ 4,224 $ 3,134 $(10,352)

Model Plant 4

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits ($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

CostEffect 

($/tons)

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($)

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recover

y credits 

($/yr)

$ 4,706 $ 4,004 1.41 $ 2,849 5,000 $ 4,224 $ 4,706 $ 4,004

$ 4,706 $ 2,598 4.22 $ 616 15,000 $ 4,224 $ 4,706 $ 2,598

$ 4,706 $ (914) 11.24 $ (81) 40,000 $ 4,224 $ 4,706 $ (914)

$ 4,706 $ (9,344) 28.10 $ (333) 100,000 $ 4,224 $ 4,706 $ (9,344)

Model Plant 4

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits ($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

CostEffect 

($/tons)

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($)

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recover

y credits 

($/yr)

$ 16,027 $ 15,310 1.43 $ 10,682 5,000 $ 24,611 $ 16,027 $ 15,310

$ 16,027 $ 13,877 4.30 $ 3,227 15,000 $ 24,611 $ 16,027 $ 13,877

$ 16,027 $ 10,294 11.47 $ 898 40,000 $ 24,611 $ 16,027 $ 10,294

$ 16,027 $ 1,694 28.67 $ 59 100,000 $ 24,611 $ 16,027 $ 1,694

VOC 

Emiss 

Reductio

n 

(tons/yr)

CostEffect 

($/tons)

 1.33 $ 2,742

 3.99 $ 581

 10.63 $ (95)

 26.58 $ (338)

VOC 

Emiss 

Reductio

n 

(tons/yr)

CostEffect 

($/tons)

 1.35 $ 1,824
 4.05 $ 275

 10.79 $ (210)

 26.97 $ (384)

VOC 

Emiss 

Reductio

n 

(tons/yr)

CostEffect 

($/tons)

 1.41 $ 2,849

 4.22 $ 616

 11.24 $ (81)

 28.10 $ (333)

VOC 

Emiss 

Reductio

n 

(tons/yr)

CostEffect 

($/tons)

 1.43 $ 10,682

 4.30 $ 3,227

 11.47 $ 898

 28.67 $ 59
A B C D E May-09 NAICS--> 31 - 33

Labor Class

Labor Rate from 

the Bureau of 

Labor Statistics

Fringe Benefit 

Loading 

Factor

Overhead and 

profit rate 

Loaded wage rate 

(B x C x D)

SOC 

Code 

Number

Mean 

Hourly 

Wage

Professional 

specialty and 

Technical

39.53 1.5 1.4 83.01

Environmental Engr.

17-2041 39.53

Executive, 

administrative and 

managerial

57.80 1.5 1.4 121.38

Engr. Manager

11-9041 57.80

Administrative 

support, including 

clerical

17.31 1.5 1.4 36.35

Admin

43-0000 17.31

Installation, 

Maintenance, and 

Repair

22.08 1.5 1.4 46.37 Installation, Maintenance, 

and Repair 49-0000 22.08

Plant and System 

Operators, All 22.72 1.5 1.4 47.71 Plant and System 

Operators, All

51-8099 22.72

May 2009 Labor rates (accessed in December 2010).

http://stats.bls.gov/oes/oes_dl.htm total cost/tech hr 92.72
Cost Comparison of Direct Water Sampling with Texas El Paso Stripping Column Sa

Facility/General Input Variables

Number of Affected Heat Exchange Systems at the facility

Number of Required Monitoring Events per Year per HE System

 (Enter 1 for Annual; 4 for Quarterly; 12 for Monthly; 52 for Weekly; 365 for Daily)

Summary Costs for Current Modeling Run - Costs per HE System

 Monitoring Method 

Capital and 1x 

Costs

 Annualized 

Capital Cost 

Annual 

Operating 

Costs

Water sampling TOC in/out $ 761 $ 186 $ 28,135

Water sampling speciated org. in only $ 761 $ 186 $ 21,174

El Paso - contracted out $ 761 $ 186 $ 19,034

El Paso - buying system $ 4,224 $ 1,030 $ 10,744

El Paso - continuous $ 24,611 $ 6,002 $ 9,230

Cost Estimate for Direct TOC Water Sampling (Inlet/Outlet) per Heat Exchange System

Planning/QA/Training 1 $ 3,045

TCI per Cooling tower $ 761

This sheet evaluates the costs of direct cooling water sampling (determining a leak by difference from inlet and outlet) and 

definition is effectively the same. Full speciation analysis for identifying the location of a leak are similar for water and air s

the direct water sampling method to achieve the same effective leak definitions as the Texas El Paso method; however, the 

Labor to collect samples 2 $ 3,722

Analytical Costs 3 $ 23,383

Repair Costs 4 $ -

Recordkeeping 5 $ 620

Reporting 6 $ 410

AOC (per HE system) $ 28,135

TAC (per HE system) $ 28,321

Cost Estimate for Direct Water Sampling (Outlet only) per Heat Exchange System

Planning/QA/Training 1 $ 3,045

TCI per Cooling tower $ 761

Labor to collect samples 12 $ 2,481

Analytical Costs 13 $ 17,663

Repair Costs 4 $ -

Recordkeeping 5 $ 620

Reporting 6 $ 410

AOC (per HE system) $ 21,174

TAC (per HE system) $ 21,360
1 Planning costs/initial evaluation and QA plan= 32 hrs engineer, 2 hrs management, 4 Admin. 

2 Time to take 3 inlet and 3 outlet samples; prepare for shipping

3 Costs for six TOC analysis (on-line price lists ranged from $50-75/sample; used $60/sample + $30 to include sample shipp

Add 0.5 hours tech and admin labor/event for sample shipping and results review.

4

5 Assume recordkeeping 0.25 hrs/event for operators

6 Assume reporting is 2 technical hr/report, semi-annual report; adds 10% Management and 20% Admin 

independent of the number of CT's

12 Time to take 1 sample; prepare for shipping

13 Costs for EPA Method 601/602 = $250/sample. Add $30 express shipping

Add 0.5 hours tech and admin labor/event for sample shipping and results review.

Not included, evaluating monitoring only
so Stripping Column Sampling

Input Value

No_HE 4

No_Events 52

Total 

Annualized 

Costs No. HE

No. 

Events

$ 28,321 4 52

$ 21,360 4 52

$ 19,219 4 52

$ 11,775 4 52

$ 15,233 4 8760

Hrs

Total Technical Mgmt Admin/Support Repair Operators

38 32 2 4 0 0

ifference from inlet and outlet) and the costs associated with the Texas El Paso stripping column method. It does not account for costs of le

 leak are similar for water and air sampling. Similarly, it assumes recordkeeping and reporting costs would be similar regardless of the samp

exas El Paso method; however, the purpose of this sheet is to illustrate the relative monitoing costs per affected heat exchange system and 

78 0 0 0 0 78

52 26 0 26 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

13 0 0 0 0 13.0

5.2 4 0.4 0.8 0 0

Hrs

Total Technical Mgmt Admin/Support Repair Operators

38 32 2 4 0 0

52 0 0 0 0 52

52 26 0 26 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0

13 0 0 0 0 13.0

5.2 4 0.4 0.8 0 0
1.5 hrs/event

mple + $30 to include sample shipping and handling $390 per sample

0.5 hrs/event

0.25 hrs/event

nd 20% Admin 2 hrs/yr

1 hrs/event

$280 per sample

0.5 hrs/event El Paso - specific costs...

7

8

9

10

11

14

15
Macro Fields - Alter only green cells

Frequency Options Current_FreqOpt

1 1 times/yr 4

2 4 times/yr

3 12 times/yr

4 52 times/yr

52 Eqn copy if needed to reset No_Events cell

Cost Estimate for El Paso Sampling per Heat Exchange System, hiring tester

Hrs

Total Technical Mgmt Admin/Support Repair

Planning 1 $ 3,045 38 32 2 4 0

Costs for Stripping Column and equipment9 0 0 0 0 0

TCI per Cooling tower $ 761

g column method. It does not account for costs of leak repair; it assumes that these costs would be similar assuming the leak 

porting costs would be similar regardless of the sampling method, being more a functionof frequency. Note: It would be difficult for 

itoing costs per affected heat exchange system and not the impact of the leak definition. 

TCI per Cooling tower $ 761

Monitoring - El Paso ; All HE 10 $ 74,413 26 26 0 0 0

Repair Costs 4 $ - 0 0 0 0 0

Recordkeeping 11 $ 21 0 0.25 0 0 0

Reporting 6 $ 410 5.2 4 0.4 0.8 0

Training 8 $ - 0 0 0 0 0

AOC (per HE system) $ 19,034

TAC (per HE system) $ 19,219

Cost Estimate for El Paso Sampling per Heat Exchange System when purchasing equipment

Hrs

Total Technical Mgmt Admin/Support Repair

Planning 1 $ 3,045 38 32 2 4 0

Costs for Stripping Column and equipment9 $ 13,850 0 0 0 0 0

TCI per Cooling tower $ 4,224

Monitoring - El Paso stripping 

column for total strippable VOC

7 $ 9,601 182 26 0 0 0

Repair Costs 4 $ - 0 0 0 0 0

Recordkeeping 5 $ 620 13 0 0 0 0

Reporting 6 $ 410 5.2 4 0.4 0.8 0

Training 8 $ 452 8 2 0 0 0

AOC (per HE system) $ 10,744
TAC (per HE system) $ 11,775

Cost Estimate for El Paso Sampling per Heat Exchange System when purchasing equipment continuous monitoring

Hrs

Total Technical Mgmt Admin/Support Repair

Planning 1 $ 3,045 38 32 2 4 0

Costs for Stripping Column and equipment 9,15 $ 23,850 0 0 0 0 0

TCI per Cooling tower $ 24,611 38

Monitoring - El Paso stripping 

column for total strippable VOC

14 $ 8,707 182.5 0 0 0 0

Repair Costs 4 $ - 0 0 0 0 0

Recordkeeping 14 $ - 0 0 0 0 0

Reporting 6 $ 410 5.2 4 0.4 0.8 0

Training 8 $ 452 8 2 0 0 0

AOC (per HE system) $ 9,230

TAC (per HE system) $ 15,233

El Paso - specific costs...

Assume 3 hours to set-up, and line-out, sample/analyze per sampling point 3 hrs/event

Add 0.5 hours tech to review results. 0.5 hrs/event

Training by engr for 3 operators for 1 hour each once per year

Costs from EnRUD Resources, Inc.; Price quote 11/2/10: purchasing equipment $13,850

Includes column, accessories, and OVA

Costs from EnRUD Resources, Inc.; Price quote 11/2/10

Costs for 1st HE/CT sample $680 for 1st HE

Costs for subsequent HE/CT sample $195 Prep /Setup + 2 hours

Add 0.5 hours tech to review results. 0.5 hrs/event

Assume 0.25 hours of operators for recordkeeping 0.25 hrs/HE

Daily check 0.5 hrs/includes recordkeeping (365 day check 0.5 hrs/includes recordkeeping (365 days/yr) 0.5 hrs/day hrs/day

Shelter for continuous monitoring system (estimated) $10,000

Capital Recovery Factor (CRF)

Useful life of QA plan &/or monitor 5 yrs

Annual interest rate 7%

CRF 0.2439

Costs from 27 TexReg 5416 1yr $70,000 TAC as reported (2002 $)

30 TAC 115, Subch H, HRVOC, Div 3 for CT HES. 2yr $52,000 TAC as reported (2002 $)

21-Jun-02

Apparent equipment and planning costs $18,000

Estimated equipment costs $14,955
Operators

0

0

uming the leak 

would be difficult for 

0

0

0

0

0

Operators

0

0

156

0

13.0

0

6
nt continuous monitoring

Operators

0

0

182.5

0

0

0

6

hrs/event

hrs/event

for 1st HE

Prep /Setup + 2 hours

hrs/event
Costs for Control Options

These are the costs used in the "Cost_by_HEsize" sheet

Summary Costs for Current Modeling Run - Costs per HE System

 Monitoring Method 

Capital and 

1x Costs

 Annualized 

Capital Cost 

Annual 

Operating 

Costs

Total 

Annualized 

Costs

Water sampling speciated org. in only $ 761 $ 186 $ 604 $ 790

Water sampling speciated org. in only $ 761 $ 186 $ 2,007 $ 2,193

Water sampling speciated org. in only $ 761 $ 186 $ 5,202 $ 5,387

Water sampling speciated org. in only $ 761 $ 186 $ 21,174 $ 21,360

El Paso - contracted out $ 761 $ 186 $ 583 $ 769

El Paso - buying system $ 4,224 $ 1,030 $ 1,309 $ 2,339

El Paso - buying system $ 4,224 $ 1,030 $ 2,882 $ 3,912

El Paso - buying system $ 4,224 $ 1,030 $ 10,744 $ 11,775

El Paso - continuous $ 24,611 $ 6,002 $ 9,230 $ 15,233

Cost Estimate for Heat Exchange System Leak Repair

Total

Labor costs for finding & repairing $ 2,809 60

Material costs for repair (=labor) $ 2,809

Speciated sample analysis $ 400

Total cost for repair $ 6,018

These are the costs for different # of HE systems; cut-and-paste table to Cell B9 above to use in model

Summary Costs for Current Modeling Run - Costs per HE System

 Monitoring Method 

Capital and 

1x Costs

 Annualized 

Capital Cost 

Annual 

Operating 

Costs

Total 

Annualized 

Costs

Water sampling speciated org. in only $ 3,045 $ 743 $ 604 $ 1,347

Water sampling speciated org. in only $ 3,045 $ 743 $ 2,007 $ 2,750

Water sampling speciated org. in only $ 3,045 $ 743 $ 5,202 $ 5,944

Water sampling speciated org. in only $ 3,045 $ 743 $ 21,174 $ 21,917

El Paso - contracted out $ 3,045 $ 743 $ 947 $ 1,690

El Paso - contracted out $ 3,045 $ 743 $ 3,316 $ 4,059

El Paso - buying system $ 16,895 $ 4,120 $ 3,221 $ 7,341

El Paso - buying system $ 16,895 $ 4,120 $ 11,084 $ 15,204

El Paso - continuous $ 26,895 $ 6,559 $ 9,569 $ 16,129

This sheet fixes costs from "Cost by monitoring method" for use in the impacts analysis used i
Summary Costs for Current Modeling Run - Costs per HE System

 Monitoring Method 

Capital and 

1x Costs

 Annualized 

Capital Cost 

Annual 

Operating 

Costs

Total 

Annualized 

Costs

Water sampling speciated org. in only $ 1,522 $ 371 $ 604 $ 975

Water sampling speciated org. in only $ 1,522 $ 371 $ 2,007 $ 2,378

Water sampling speciated org. in only $ 1,522 $ 371 $ 5,202 $ 5,573

Water sampling speciated org. in only $ 1,522 $ 371 $ 21,174 $ 21,546

El Paso - contracted out $ 1,522 $ 371 $ 705 $ 1,076

El Paso - contracted out $ 1,522 $ 371 $ 2,346 $ 2,718

El Paso - buying system $ 8,447 $ 2,060 $ 2,995 $ 5,055

El Paso - buying system $ 8,447 $ 2,060 $ 10,857 $ 12,918

El Paso - continuous $ 25,372 $ 6,188 $ 9,343 $ 15,531

Summary Costs for Current Modeling Run - Costs per HE System

 Monitoring Method 

Capital and 

1x Costs

 Annualized 

Capital Cost 

Annual 

Operating 

Costs

Total 

Annualized 

Costs

Water sampling speciated org. in only $ 761 $ 186 $ 604 $ 790

Water sampling speciated org. in only $ 761 $ 186 $ 2,007 $ 2,193

Water sampling speciated org. in only $ 761 $ 186 $ 5,202 $ 5,387

Water sampling speciated org. in only $ 761 $ 186 $ 21,174 $ 21,360

El Paso - contracted out $ 761 $ 186 $ 583 $ 769

El Paso - buying system $ 4,224 $ 1,030 $ 1,309 $ 2,339

El Paso - buying system $ 4,224 $ 1,030 $ 2,882 $ 3,912

El Paso - buying system $ 4,224 $ 1,030 $ 10,744 $ 11,775

El Paso - continuous $ 24,611 $ 6,002 $ 9,230 $ 15,233
No. HE

No. 

Events

4 1

4 4

4 12

4 52

4 1

4 4

4 12

4 52

4 8760

Technical Mgmt Admin/Support Repair Operators

0 0 40 20

ove to use in model

No. HE

No. 

Events

1 1

1 4

1 12

1 52

1 1

1 4

1 12

1 52

1 8760

se in the impacts analysis used in Sheet "Cost_by_Ctsize"
No. HE

No. 

Events

2 1

2 4

2 12

2 52

2 1

2 4

2 12

2 52

2 8760

No. HE

No. 

Events

4 1

4 4

4 12

4 52

4 1

4 4

4 12

4 52

4 8760
Appendix C

$ 15,233 $ 16,689 1.46 $ (731) $ 15,958 10,912.52

$ 15,233 $ 16,689 4.39 $ (2,194) $ 14,495 3,304.17

$ 15,233 $ 16,689 11.70 $ (5,849) $ 10,840 926.57

0900006480f641a0.xls

Cost by HEsize
Results for 1 HE systems at facility; 50% delayed leak repair, $500/ton VOC credit

No. HE per facility 1 Reduct_Factor 0.3

Leak_Defn 1000 ppbw Fr_Delayed 0.5

Delay_Limit 5000 ppbw VOC_credit 500 $/ton

Summary of Results for Option 1 - annual sampling

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 3,045 $ 1,822 $ 1,410 0.82 $ 1,710

 15,000 $ 3,045 $ 1,822 $ 586 2.47 $ 237

 40,000 $ 3,045 $ 1,822 $ (1,475) 6.59 $ (224)

110,000 $ 3,045 $ 1,822 $ (7,245) 18.13 $ (400)

Summary of Results for Option 2 - quarterly sampling

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 3,045 $ 4,191 $ 3,682 1.02 $ 3,610

 15,000 $ 3,045 $ 4,191 $ 2,662 3.06 $ 870

 40,000 $ 3,045 $ 4,191 $ 113 8.16 $ 14

110,000 $ 3,045 $ 4,191 $ (7,025) 22.43 $ (313)

Summary of Results for Option 3 - monthly sampling

Model 

Ave. TAC 

Model w/recovery VOC Emiss 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 16,895 $ 7,474 $ 6,942 1.06 $ 6,530

 15,000 $ 16,895 $ 7,474 $ 5,879 3.19 $ 1,843

 40,000 $ 16,895 $ 7,474 $ 3,221 8.51 $ 379

110,000 $ 16,895 $ 7,474 $ (4,221) 23.39 $ (180)

Summary of Results for Option 4 - weekly sampling

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 16,895 $ 15,336 $ 14,797 1.08 $ 13,702

 15,000 $ 16,895 $ 15,336 $ 13,717 3.24 $ 4,234

 40,000 $ 16,895 $ 15,336 $ 11,017 8.64 $ 1,275

110,000 $ 16,895 $ 15,336 $ 3,458 23.76 $ 146

Summary of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)
 5,000 $ 26,895 $ 16,261 $ 15,719 1.08 $ 14,490

 15,000 $ 26,895 $ 16,261 $ 14,634 3.25 $ 4,497

 40,000 $ 26,895 $ 16,261 $ 11,922 8.68 $ 1,374

110,000 $ 26,895 $ 16,261 $ 4,328 23.87 $ 181

No. HE 202

Summary of results for 5,000 gpm CT

Net TAC EmRed

1a $ 1,410 0.82

1b $ 1,569 1.03

1c $ 1,937 1.09

1d $ 2,587 1.12

2a $ 3,682 1.02

2b $ 3,818 1.28

2c $ 4,179 1.35

2d $ 4,827 1.38

3a $ 6,942 1.06

3b $ 7,074 1.33

3c $ 7,433 1.41

3d $ 8,081 1.43

4a $ 14,797 1.08

4b $ 14,927 1.35

4c $ 15,285 1.43

4d $ 15,933 1.46

5a $ 15,719 1.08

5b $ 15,848 1.36

5c $ 16,206 1.43

5d $ 16,854 1.46

CE IncrCE

1b $ 1,569 1.03 $ 1,517

2b $ 3,818 1.28 $ 2,994 $ 9,345

2c $ 4,179 1.35 $ 3,099 $ 4,933

3c $ 7,433 1.41 $ 5,290 $ 57,599

5c $ 16,206 1.43 $ 11,307 $ 311,019

$-

$2,000 

$4,000 

$6,000 

$8,000 

$10,000 

$12,000 

$14,000 

$16,000 

$18,000 

5,000 GPM HE System

Annual

Quarterly

Monthly

Weekly

Continuous
$

-

- 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 

Emission Reductions (tpy per model HE system)
VOC credit

No. HE per facility 1 Reduct_Factor 0.3

Leak_Defn 80 ppbw Fr_Delayed 0.5

Delay_Limit 800 ppbw VOC_credit 500 $/ton

Summary of Results for Option 1 - annual sampling

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 3,045 $ 2,087 $ 1,569 1.03 $ 1,517

 15,000 $ 3,045 $ 2,087 $ 535 3.10 $ 172

 40,000 $ 3,045 $ 2,087 $ (2,052) 8.28 $ (248)

110,000 $ 3,045 $ 2,087 $ (9,296) 22.77 $ (408)

Summary of Results for Option 2 - quarterly sampling

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 3,045 $ 4,456 $ 3,818 1.28 $ 2,994

 15,000 $ 3,045 $ 4,456 $ 2,543 3.83 $ 665

 40,000 $ 3,045 $ 4,456 $ (646) 10.20 $ (63)

110,000 $ 3,045 $ 4,456 $ (9,574) 28.06 $ (341)

Summary of Results for Option 3 - monthly sampling

Model 

Ave. TAC 

Model w/recovery VOC Emiss 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 16,895 $ 7,738 $ 7,074 1.33 $ 5,323

 15,000 $ 16,895 $ 7,738 $ 5,745 3.99 $ 1,441

 40,000 $ 16,895 $ 7,738 $ 2,423 10.63 $ 228

110,000 $ 16,895 $ 7,738 $ (6,880) 29.24 $ (235)

Summary of Results for Option 4 - weekly sampling

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 16,895 $ 15,601 $ 14,927 1.35 $ 11,061

 15,000 $ 16,895 $ 15,601 $ 13,577 4.05 $ 3,354

 40,000 $ 16,895 $ 15,601 $ 10,203 10.80 $ 945

110,000 $ 16,895 $ 15,601 $ 757 29.69 $ 25

Summary of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)
 5,000 $ 26,895 $ 16,526 $ 15,848 1.36 $ 11,691

 15,000 $ 26,895 $ 16,526 $ 14,492 4.07 $ 3,564

 40,000 $ 26,895 $ 16,526 $ 11,103 10.85 $ 1,024

110,000 $ 26,895 $ 16,526 $ 1,614 29.82 $ 54

No. HE 150

Summary of results for 15,000 gpm CT

Net TAC EmRed

1a $ 586 2.47

1b $ 535 3.10

1c $ 843 3.28

$ 1,470 3.35

2a $ 2,662 3.06

2b $ 2,543 3.83

2c $ 2,831 4.05

$ 3,451 4.13

3a $ 5,879 3.19

3b $ 5,745 3.99

3c $ 6,028 4.22

$ 6,647 4.30

4a $ 13,717 3.24

4b $ 13,577 4.05

4c $ 13,858 4.28

$ 14,477 4.37

5a $ 14,634 3.25

5b $ 14,492 4.07

5c $ 14,773 4.30

$ 15,392 4.39

CE IncrCE

$ 535 3.10 $ 172

$ 2,543 3.83 $ 665 $ 2,782

$ 2,831 4.05 $ 700 $ 1,311

$ 6,028 4.22 $ 1,430 $ 18,866

$ 14,773 4.30 $ 3,436 $ 103,340

$(2,000)

$2,000 

$4,000 

$6,000 

$8,000 

$10,000 

$12,000 

$14,000 

$-

$2,000 

$4,000 

$6,000 

$8,000 

$10,000 

$12,000 

$14,000 

$16,000 

$18,000 

15,000 GPM HE System

Annual

Quarterly

Monthly

Weekly

Continuous
$ $(4,000) - - 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 

Emission Reductions (tpy per model HE system)
No. HE per facility 1 Reduct_Factor 0.3 No. HE per facility

Leak_Defn 40 ppbw Fr_Delayed 0.5 Leak_Defn

Delay_Limit 800 ppbw VOC_credit 500 $/ton Delay_Limit

Summary of Results for Option 1 - annual sampling Summary of Results for O

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

Model 

Size 

(gpm)

 5,000 $ 3,045 $ 2,484 $ 1,937 1.09 $ 1,770 5,000

 15,000 $ 3,045 $ 2,484 $ 843 3.28 $ 257 15,000

 40,000 $ 3,045 $ 2,484 $ (1,893) 8.75 $ (216) 40,000

 110,000 $ 3,045 $ 2,484 $ (9,554) 24.08 $ (397) 110,000

Summary of Results for Option 2 - quarterly sampling Summary of Results for O

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

Model 

Size 

(gpm)

 5,000 $ 3,045 $ 4,853 $ 4,179 1.35 $ 3,099 5,000

 15,000 $ 3,045 $ 4,853 $ 2,831 4.05 $ 700 15,000

 40,000 $ 3,045 $ 4,853 $ (541) 10.79 $ (50) 40,000

 110,000 $ 3,045 $ 4,853 $ (9,981) 29.67 $ (336) 110,000

Summary of Results for Option 3 - monthly sampling Summary of Results for O

Model 

Ave. TAC 

Model w/recovery VOC Emiss Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

Model 

Size 

(gpm)

 5,000 $ 16,895 $ 8,136 $ 7,433 1.41 $ 5,290 5,000

 15,000 $ 16,895 $ 8,136 $ 6,028 4.22 $ 1,430 15,000

 40,000 $ 16,895 $ 8,136 $ 2,515 11.24 $ 224 40,000

 110,000 $ 16,895 $ 8,136 $ (7,320) 30.91 $ (237) 110,000

Summary of Results for Option 4 - weekly sampling Summary of Results for O

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

Model 

Size 

(gpm)

 5,000 $ 16,895 $ 15,998 $ 15,285 1.43 $ 10,713 5,000

 15,000 $ 16,895 $ 15,998 $ 13,858 4.28 $ 3,238 15,000

 40,000 $ 16,895 $ 15,998 $ 10,291 11.41 $ 902 40,000

 110,000 $ 16,895 $ 15,998 $ 304 31.39 $ 10 110,000

Summary of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling Summary of Results for O

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

Model 

Size 

(gpm)
 5,000 $ 26,895 $ 16,923 $ 16,206 1.43 $ 11,307 5,000

 15,000 $ 26,895 $ 16,923 $ 14,773 4.30 $ 3,436 15,000

 40,000 $ 26,895 $ 16,923 $ 11,190 11.47 $ 976 40,000

 110,000 $ 26,895 $ 16,923 $ 1,157 31.53 $ 37 110,000

No. HE 150 No. HE

Summary of results for 40,000 gpm CT Summary of results for 1

Net TAC EmRed

1a $ (1,475) 6.59 1a

1b $ (2,052) 8.28 1b

1c $ (1,893) 8.75 1c

$ (1,324) 8.94

2a $ 113 8.16 2a

2b $ (646) 10.20 2b

2c $ (541) 10.79 2c

$ 11 11.01

3a $ 3,221 8.51 3a

3b $ 2,423 10.63 3b

3c $ 2,515 11.24 3c

$ 3,063 11.47

4a $ 11,017 8.64 4a

4b $ 10,203 10.80 4b

4c $ 10,291 11.41 4c

$ 10,837 11.65

5a $ 11,922 8.68 5a

5b $ 11,103 10.85 5b

5c $ 11,190 11.47 5c

$ 11,736 11.70

CE IncrCE

$ (2,052) 8.28 $ (248)

$ (646) 10.20 $ (63) $ 731

$ (541) 10.79 $ (50) $ 179

$ 2,515 11.24 $ 224 $ 6,762

$ 11,190 11.47 $ 976 $ 38,440

$(2,000)

$-

$2,000 

$4,000 

$6,000 

$8,000 

$10,000 

$12,000 

$14,000 

- 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 

40,000 GPM HE System

Annual

Quarterly

Monthly

Weekly

Continuous

$(12,000)

$(10,000)

$(8,000)

$(6,000)

$(4,000)

$(2,000)

$-

$2,000 

$4,000 

$6,000 

-
$(4,000)

Emission Reductions (tpy per model HE system)

$(12,000)
1 Reduct_Factor 0.3

10 ppbw Fr_Delayed 0.5

800 ppbw VOC_credit 500 $/ton

Summary of Results for Option 1 - annual sampling

TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

$ 3,045 $ 3,146 $ 2,587 1.12 $ 2,316

$ 3,045 $ 3,146 $ 1,470 3.35 $ 439

$ 3,045 $ 3,146 $ (1,324) 8.94 $ (148)

$ 3,045 $ 3,146 $ (9,145) 24.58 $ (372)

Summary of Results for Option 2 - quarterly sampling

TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

$ 3,045 $ 5,515 $ 4,827 1.38 $ 3,508

$ 3,045 $ 5,515 $ 3,451 4.13 $ 836

$ 3,045 $ 5,515 $ 11 11.01 $ 1

$ 3,045 $ 5,515 $ (9,622) 30.27 $ (318)

Summary of Results for Option 3 - monthly sampling

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery VOC Emiss 

TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

$ 16,895 $ 8,798 $ 8,081 1.43 $ 5,637

$ 16,895 $ 8,798 $ 6,647 4.30 $ 1,546

$ 16,895 $ 8,798 $ 3,063 11.47 $ 267

$ 16,895 $ 8,798 $ (6,972) 31.54 $ (221)

Summary of Results for Option 4 - weekly sampling

TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

$ 16,895 $ 16,660 $ 15,933 1.46 $ 10,945

$ 16,895 $ 16,660 $ 14,477 4.37 $ 3,315

$ 16,895 $ 16,660 $ 10,837 11.65 $ 931

$ 16,895 $ 16,660 $ 647 32.03 $ 20

Summary of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling

TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)
$ 26,895 $ 17,585 $ 16,854 1.46 $ 11,525

$ 26,895 $ 17,585 $ 15,392 4.39 $ 3,508

$ 26,895 $ 17,585 $ 11,736 11.70 $ 1,003

$ 26,895 $ 17,585 $ 1,499 32.17 $ 47

18

Summary of results for 110,000 gpm CT Summary of Nationwide R

Net TAC EmRed

$ (7,245) 18.13 1a

$ (9,296) 22.77 1b

$ (9,554) 24.08 1c

$ (9,145) 24.58

$ (7,025) 22.43 2a

$ (9,574) 28.06 2b

$ (9,981) 29.67 Quarterly_all 2c

$ (9,622) 30.27 Quarterly_small/Monthly_large 2c/3c

$ (4,221) 23.39 3a

$ (6,880) 29.24 Monthly_all 3b

$ (7,320) 30.91 Monthly_all 3c

$ (6,972) 31.54

$ 3,458 23.76 4a

$ 757 29.69 4b

$ 304 31.39 4c

$ 647 32.03

$ 4,328 23.87 5a

$ 1,614 29.82 5b

$ 1,157 31.53 5c

$ 1,499 32.17

CE IncrCE

$ (9,296) 22.77 $ (408) 3b

$ (9,574) 28.06 $ (341) $ (52) 2c

$ (9,981) 29.67 $ (336) $ (253) 2c/3c

$ (7,320) 30.91 $ (237) $ 2,141 3c

$ 1,157 31.53 $ 37 $ 13,660 5c

5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 

110,000 GPM HE System

Annual

Quarterly

Monthly

Weekly

Continuous
Emission Reductions (tpy per model HE system)

Summary of Nationwide Results

Net TAC EmRed

$ 20,952 1,853.02

$ (77,965) 2,326.23

$ 61,654 2,460.06

$ 379,977 2,511.87

$ 1,033,370 2,292.32

$ 883,608 2,867.22

$ 1,007,973 3,031.56

$ 1,514,309 3,121.73

$ 2,530,268 2,987.44 MACT Floor

$ 2,651,244 3,158.56

$ 2,963,353 3,222.79

$ 6,761,222 2,427.49

$ 6,595,815 3,033.68

$ 6,715,487 3,207.41

$ 7,027,162 3,272.51

$ 7,236,458 2,438.69

$ 7,069,755 3,047.47

$ 7,189,038 3,221.97

$ 7,500,583 3,287.34

CE IncrCE

$ 2,530,268 2,987.44 $ 847

$ 1,007,973 3,031.56 $ 332 $(34,505)

$ 1,514,309 3,121.73 $ 485 $ 5,616

$ 2,651,244 3,158.56 $ 839 $ 30,866

$ 7,189,038 3,221.97 $ 2,231 $ 71,560
Summary of Results for Option 2 - quarterly sampling Summary of Results for Option 2 - quarterly sampling

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

 5,000 $ 1,522 $ 2,850 $ 2,340 1.02 $ 2,295 5,000 $ 1,522 $ 3,115 $ 2,477 1.28

 15,000 $ 1,522 $ 2,850 $ 1,321 3.06 $ 432 15,000 $ 1,522 $ 3,115 $ 1,202 3.83

 40,000 $ 1,522 $ 2,850 $ (1,229) 8.16 $ (151) 40,000 $ 1,522 $ 3,115 $ (1,987) 10.20

110,000 $ 1,522 $ 2,850 $ (8,367) 22.43 $ (373) 110,000 $ 1,522 $ 3,115 $ (10,915) 28.06

Summary of Results for Option 3 - monthly sampling Summary of Results for Option 3 - monthly sampling

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

 5,000 $ 8,447 $ 5,187 $ 4,656 1.06 $ 4,379 5,000 $ 8,447 $ 5,452 $ 4,788 1.33

 15,000 $ 8,447 $ 5,187 $ 3,593 3.19 $ 1,126 15,000 $ 8,447 $ 5,452 $ 3,459 3.99

 40,000 $ 8,447 $ 5,187 $ 935 8.51 $ 110 40,000 $ 8,447 $ 5,452 $ 136 10.63

110,000 $ 8,447 $ 5,187 $ (6,507) 23.39 $ (278) 110,000 $ 8,447 $ 5,452 $ (9,166) 29.24

Summary of Results for Option 4 - weekly sampling Summary of Results for Option 4 - weekly sampling

Model 

Size 

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery

credits 

VOC Emiss 

Reduction Cost-Effect 

Model 

Size 

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery

credits 

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

11/1/2011 0900006480f641a0.xls Results_2

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

w/recovery

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

w/recovery

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

 5,000 $ 8,447 $ 13,050 $ 12,510 1.08 $ 11,585 5,000 $ 8,447 $ 13,315 $ 12,640 1.35

 15,000 $ 8,447 $ 13,050 $ 11,430 3.24 $ 3,528 15,000 $ 8,447 $ 13,315 $ 11,291 4.05

 40,000 $ 8,447 $ 13,050 $ 8,731 8.64 $ 1,011 40,000 $ 8,447 $ 13,315 $ 7,917 10.80

110,000 $ 8,447 $ 13,050 $ 1,172 23.76 $ 49 110,000 $ 8,447 $ 13,315 $ (1,530) 29.69

Summary of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling Summary of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

 5,000 $ 25,372 $ 15,664 $ 15,121 1.08 $ 13,939 5,000 $ 25,372 $ 15,929 $ 15,251 1.36

 15,000 $ 25,372 $ 15,664 $ 14,036 3.25 $ 4,313 15,000 $ 25,372 $ 15,929 $ 13,895 4.07

 40,000 $ 25,372 $ 15,664 $ 11,324 8.68 $ 1,305 40,000 $ 25,372 $ 15,929 $ 10,506 10.85

11/1/2011 0900006480f641a0.xls Results_2
Results for 4 HE system at facility; 50% delayed repair; $500 recovery credit

No. HE per facility 4 Reduct_Factor 0.3

Leak_Defn 1000 ppbw Fr_Delayed 0.5

Delay_Limit 5000 ppbw VOC_credit 500 $/ton

Summary of Results for Option 1 - annual sampling

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 761 $ 901 $ 489 0.82 $ 594

 15,000 $ 761 $ 901 $ (335) 2.47 $ (135)

 40,000 $ 761 $ 901 $ (2,396) 6.59 $ (363)

110,000 $ 761 $ 901 $ (8,166) 18.13 $ (450)

Summary of Results for Option 2 - quarterly sampling

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 4,224 $ 2,472 $ 1,962 1.02 $ 1,924

 15,000 $ 4,224 $ 2,472 $ 942 3.06 $ 308

 40,000 $ 4,224 $ 2,472 $ (1,607) 8.16 $ (197)

110,000 $ 4,224 $ 2,472 $ (8,745) 22.43 $ (390)

Summary of Results for Option 3 - monthly sampling

Model 

Ave. TAC 

Model w/recovery VOC Emiss 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 4,224 $ 4,044 $ 3,513 1.06 $ 3,304

 15,000 $ 4,224 $ 4,044 $ 2,449 3.19 $ 768

 40,000 $ 4,224 $ 4,044 $ (208) 8.51 $ (25)

110,000 $ 4,224 $ 4,044 $ (7,650) 23.39 $ (327)

Summary of Results for Option 4 - weekly sampling

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 4,224 $ 11,907 $ 11,367 1.08 $ 10,527

 15,000 $ 4,224 $ 11,907 $ 10,287 3.24 $ 3,176

 40,000 $ 4,224 $ 11,907 $ 7,588 8.64 $ 878

110,000 $ 4,224 $ 11,907 $ 29 23.76 $ 1

Summary of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)
 5,000 $ 24,611 $ 15,365 $ 14,823 1.08 $ 13,664

 15,000 $ 24,611 $ 15,365 $ 13,738 3.25 $ 4,221

 40,000 $ 24,611 $ 15,365 $ 11,026 8.68 $ 1,270

110,000 $ 24,611 $ 15,365 $ 3,432 23.87 $ 144

No. HE 202

Summary of results for 5,000 gpm CT

Net TAC EmRed

1a $ 489 0.82

1b $ 649 1.03

1c $ 1,016 1.09

1d $ 1,667 1.12

2a $ 1,962 1.02

2b $ 2,099 1.28

2c $ 2,459 1.35

2d $ 3,107 1.38

3a $ 3,513 1.06

3b $ 3,644 1.33

3c $ 4,004 1.41

3d $ 4,651 1.43

4a $ 11,367 1.08

4b $ 11,497 1.35

4c $ 11,856 1.43

4d $ 12,503 1.46

5a $ 14,823 1.08

5b $ 14,952 1.36

5c $ 15,310 1.43

5d $ 15,958 1.46

CE IncrCE

1b $ 649 1.03 $ 627

2b $ 2,099 1.28 $ 1,645 $ 6,025

2c $ 2,459 1.35 $ 1,824 $ 4,933

3c $ 4,004 1.41 $ 2,849 $ 27,336

5c $ 15,310 1.43 $ 10,682 $ 400,829

$2,000 

$4,000 

$6,000 

$8,000 

$10,000 

$12,000 

$14,000 

$16,000 

$18,000 

T

otal Annualized C

ost ($/yr/HE system)

5,000 GPM HE System

Annual

Quarterly

Monthly

Weekly

Continuous
$

-

$2,000 

- 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 

Total Annualized 

Emission Reductions (tpy per model HE system)
No. HE per facility 4 Reduct_Factor 0.3

Leak_Defn 80 ppbw Fr_Delayed 0.5

Delay_Limit 800 ppbw VOC_credit 500 $/ton

Summary of Results for Option 1 - annual sampling

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 761 $ 1,166 $ 649 1.03 $ 627

 15,000 $ 761 $ 1,166 $ (386) 3.10 $ (124)

 40,000 $ 761 $ 1,166 $ (2,973) 8.28 $ (359)

110,000 $ 761 $ 1,166 $ (10,217) 22.77 $ (449)

Summary of Results for Option 2 - quarterly sampling

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 4,224 $ 2,736 $ 2,099 1.28 $ 1,645

 15,000 $ 4,224 $ 2,736 $ 823 3.83 $ 215

 40,000 $ 4,224 $ 2,736 $ (2,365) 10.20 $ (232)

110,000 $ 4,224 $ 2,736 $ (11,294) 28.06 $ (402)

Summary of Results for Option 3 - monthly sampling

Model 

Ave. TAC 

Model w/recovery VOC Emiss 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 4,224 $ 4,309 $ 3,644 1.33 $ 2,742

 15,000 $ 4,224 $ 4,309 $ 2,315 3.99 $ 581

 40,000 $ 4,224 $ 4,309 $ (1,007) 10.63 $ (95)

110,000 $ 4,224 $ 4,309 $ (10,309) 29.24 $ (353)

Summary of Results for Option 4 - weekly sampling

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 4,224 $ 12,172 $ 11,497 1.35 $ 8,519

 15,000 $ 4,224 $ 12,172 $ 10,147 4.05 $ 2,506

 40,000 $ 4,224 $ 12,172 $ 6,774 10.80 $ 627

110,000 $ 4,224 $ 12,172 $ (2,673) 29.69 $ (90)

Summary of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)
 5,000 $ 24,611 $ 15,630 $ 14,952 1.36 $ 11,029

 15,000 $ 24,611 $ 15,630 $ 13,596 4.07 $ 3,343

 40,000 $ 24,611 $ 15,630 $ 10,207 10.85 $ 941

110,000 $ 24,611 $ 15,630 $ 718 29.82 $ 24

No. HE 150

Summary of results for 15,000 gpm CT

Net TAC EmRed

1a $ (335) 2.47

1b $ (386) 3.10

1c $ (78) 3.28

$ 549 3.35

2a $ 942 3.06

2b $ 823 3.83

2c $ 1,111 4.05

$ 1,731 4.13

3a $ 2,449 3.19

3b $ 2,315 3.99

3c $ 2,598 4.22

$ 3,218 4.30

4a $ 10,287 3.24

4b $ 10,147 4.05

4c $ 10,429 4.28

$ 11,047 4.37

5a $ 13,738 3.25

5b $ 13,596 4.07

5c $ 13,877 4.30

$ 14,495 4.39

CE IncrCE

$ (386) 3.10 $ (124)

$ 823 3.83 $ 215 $ 1,675

$ 1,111 4.05 $ 275 $ 1,311

$ 2,598 4.22 $ 616 $ 8,779

$ 13,877 4.30 $ 3,227 $ 133,276

$(2,000)

$2,000 

$4,000 

$6,000 

$8,000 

$10,000 

$12,000 

T

otal Annualized C

ost ($/yr/HE system)

$-

$2,000 

$4,000 

$6,000 

$8,000 

$10,000 

$12,000 

$14,000 

$16,000 

T

otal Annualized C

ost ($/yr/HE system)

15,000 GPM HE System

Annual

Quarterly

Monthly

Weekly

Continuous
$(4,000)

$(2,000)

Total Annualized 

$(2,000) $-

- 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 

Total Annualized 

Emission Reductions (tpy per model HE system)
No. HE per facility 4 Reduct_Factor 0.3 No. HE per facility

Leak_Defn 40 ppbw Fr_Delayed 0.5 Leak_Defn

Delay_Limit 800 ppbw VOC_credit 500 $/ton Delay_Limit

Summary of Results for Option 1 - annual sampling Summary of Results for O

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

Model 

Size 

(gpm)

 5,000 $ 761 $ 1,563 $ 1,016 1.09 $ 929 5,000

 15,000 $ 761 $ 1,563 $ (78) 3.28 $ (24) 15,000

 40,000 $ 761 $ 1,563 $ (2,814) 8.75 $ (321) 40,000

 110,000 $ 761 $ 1,563 $ (10,474) 24.08 $ (435) 110,000

Summary of Results for Option 2 - quarterly sampling Summary of Results for O

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

Model 

Size 

(gpm)

 5,000 $ 4,224 $ 3,134 $ 2,459 1.35 $ 1,824 5,000

 15,000 $ 4,224 $ 3,134 $ 1,111 4.05 $ 275 15,000

 40,000 $ 4,224 $ 3,134 $ (2,261) 10.79 $ (210) 40,000

 110,000 $ 4,224 $ 3,134 $ (11,701) 29.67 $ (394) 110,000

Summary of Results for Option 3 - monthly sampling Summary of Results for O

Model 

Ave. TAC 

Model w/recovery VOC Emiss Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

Model 

Size 

(gpm)

 5,000 $ 4,224 $ 4,706 $ 4,004 1.41 $ 2,849 5,000

 15,000 $ 4,224 $ 4,706 $ 2,598 4.22 $ 616 15,000

 40,000 $ 4,224 $ 4,706 $ (914) 11.24 $ (81) 40,000

 110,000 $ 4,224 $ 4,706 $ (10,750) 30.91 $ (348) 110,000

Summary of Results for Option 4 - weekly sampling Summary of Results for O

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

Model 

Size 

(gpm)

 5,000 $ 4,224 $ 12,569 $ 11,856 1.43 $ 8,309 5,000

 15,000 $ 4,224 $ 12,569 $ 10,429 4.28 $ 2,436 15,000

 40,000 $ 4,224 $ 12,569 $ 6,862 11.41 $ 601 40,000

 110,000 $ 4,224 $ 12,569 $ (3,126) 31.39 $ (100) 110,000

Summary of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling Summary of Results for O

Model 

Size 

(gpm) TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

Model 

Size 

(gpm)
 5,000 $ 24,611 $ 16,027 $ 15,310 1.43 $ 10,682 5,000

 15,000 $ 24,611 $ 16,027 $ 13,877 4.30 $ 3,227 15,000

 40,000 $ 24,611 $ 16,027 $ 10,294 11.47 $ 898 40,000

 110,000 $ 24,611 $ 16,027 $ 261 31.53 $ 8 110,000

No. HE 150 No. HE

Summary of results for 40,000 gpm CT Summary of results for 1

Net TAC EmRed

1a $ (2,396) 6.59 1a

1b $ (2,973) 8.28 1b

1c $ (2,814) 8.75 1c

$ (2,244) 8.94

2a $ (1,607) 8.16 2a

2b $ (2,365) 10.20 2b

2c $ (2,261) 10.79 2c

$ (1,709) 11.01

3a $ (208) 8.51 3a

3b $ (1,007) 10.63 3b

3c $ (914) 11.24 3c

$ (366) 11.47

4a $ 7,588 8.64 4a

4b $ 6,774 10.80 4b

4c $ 6,862 11.41 4c

$ 7,408 11.65

5a $ 11,026 8.68 5a

5b $ 10,207 10.85 5b

5c $ 10,294 11.47 5c

$ 10,840 11.70

CE IncrCE

$ (2,973) 8.28 $ (359)

$ (2,365) 10.20 $ (232) $ 316

$ (2,261) 10.79 $ (210) $ 179

$ (914) 11.24 $ (81) $ 2,979

$ 10,294 11.47 $ 898 $ 49,666

$(2,000)

$-

$2,000 

$4,000 

$6,000 

$8,000 

$10,000 

$12,000 

- 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 

40,000 GPM HE System

Annual

Quarterly

Monthly

Weekly

Continuous

$(12,000)

$(10,000)

$(8,000)

$(6,000)

$(4,000)

$(2,000)

$-

$2,000 

$4,000 

$6,000 

-

T

otal Annualized C

ost ($/yr/HE system)
$(4,000)

$(2,000)

Emission Reductions (tpy per model HE system)

$(14,000)

$(12,000)

Total Annualize
4 Reduct_Factor 0.3

10 ppbw Fr_Delayed 0.5

800 ppbw VOC_credit 500 $/ton

Summary of Results for Option 1 - annual sampling

TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

$ 761 $ 2,225 $ 1,667 1.12 $ 1,492

$ 761 $ 2,225 $ 549 3.35 $ 164

$ 761 $ 2,225 $ (2,244) 8.94 $ (251)

$ 761 $ 2,225 $ (10,066) 24.58 $ (409)

Summary of Results for Option 2 - quarterly sampling

TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

$ 4,224 $ 3,795 $ 3,107 1.38 $ 2,258

$ 4,224 $ 3,795 $ 1,731 4.13 $ 419

$ 4,224 $ 3,795 $ (1,709) 11.01 $ (155)

$ 4,224 $ 3,795 $ (11,342) 30.27 $ (375)

Summary of Results for Option 3 - monthly sampling

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery VOC Emiss 

TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

$ 4,224 $ 5,368 $ 4,651 1.43 $ 3,244

$ 4,224 $ 5,368 $ 3,218 4.30 $ 748

$ 4,224 $ 5,368 $ (366) 11.47 $ (32)

$ 4,224 $ 5,368 $ (10,402) 31.54 $ (330)

Summary of Results for Option 4 - weekly sampling

TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

$ 4,224 $ 13,231 $ 12,503 1.46 $ 8,589

$ 4,224 $ 13,231 $ 11,047 4.37 $ 2,530

$ 4,224 $ 13,231 $ 7,408 11.65 $ 636

$ 4,224 $ 13,231 $ (2,782) 32.03 $ (87)

Summary of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling

TCI ($) Ave. TAC ($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits 

($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)
$ 24,611 $ 16,689 $ 15,958 1.46 $ 10,913

$ 24,611 $ 16,689 $ 14,495 4.39 $ 3,304

$ 24,611 $ 16,689 $ 10,840 11.70 $ 927

$ 24,611 $ 16,689 $ 603 32.17 $ 19

18

Summary of results for 110,000 gpm CT Summary of Nationwide R

Net TAC EmRed

$ (8,166) 18.13 1a

$ (10,217) 22.77 1b

$ (10,474) 24.08 1c

$ (10,066) 24.58

$ (8,745) 22.43 2a

$ (11,294) 28.06 2b

$ (11,701) 29.67 Quarterly_all 2c

$ (11,342) 30.27 Quarterly_small/Monthly_large 2c/3c

$ (7,650) 23.39 3a

$ (10,309) 29.24 Monthly_all 3b

$ (10,750) 30.91 Monthly_all 3c

$ (10,402) 31.54

$ 29 23.76 4a

$ (2,673) 29.69 4b

$ (3,126) 31.39 4c

$ (2,782) 32.03

$ 3,432 23.87 5a

$ 718 29.82 5b

$ 261 31.53 5c

$ 603 32.17

CE IncrCE

$ (10,217) 22.77 $ (449) 3b

$ (11,294) 28.06 $ (402) $ (203) 2c

$ (11,701) 29.67 $ (394) $ (253) 2c/3c

$ (10,750) 30.91 $ (348) $ 765 3c

$ 261 31.53 $ 8 $ 17,742 5c

5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 

110,000 GPM HE System

Annual

Quarterly

Monthly

Weekly

Continuous
Emission Reductions (tpy per model HE system)

Summary of Nationwide Results

Net TAC EmRed

$ (457,790) 1,853.02

$ (556,707) 2,326.23

$ (417,088) 2,460.06

$ (98,765) 2,511.87

$ 139,043 2,292.32

$ (10,719) 2,867.22

$ 113,646 3,031.56

$ 332,754 3,121.73

$ 746,904 2,987.44 MACT Floor

$ 867,880 3,158.56

$ 1,179,989 3,222.79

$ 4,977,858 2,427.49

$ 4,812,451 3,033.68

$ 4,932,123 3,207.41

$ 5,243,798 3,272.51

$ 6,770,469 2,438.69

$ 6,603,766 3,047.47

$ 6,723,049 3,221.97

$ 7,034,594 3,287.34

CE IncrCE

$ 746,904 2,987.44 $ 250 3,038.03

$ 113,646 3,031.56 $ 37 $ (14,354) 3,140.07

$ 332,754 3,121.73 $ 107 $ 2,430 3,196.15

$ 867,880 3,158.56 $ 275 $ 14,528 3,219.59

$ 6,723,049 3,221.97 $ 2,087 $ 92,334 3,259.30
No. HE per facility 4 Reduct_Factor 0.3

Leak_Defn 10 ppbw Fr_Delayed 0.5

Delay_Limit 800 ppbw VOC_credit 500 $/ton

Summary of Results for Option 1 - annual sampling

Model 

Size (gpm) TCI ($)

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits ($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 761 $ 2,225 $ 1,667 1.12 $ 1,492

 15,000 $ 761 $ 2,225 $ 549 3.35 $ 164

 40,000 $ 761 $ 2,225 $ (2,244) 8.94 $ (251)

 110,000 $ 761 $ 2,225 $ (10,066) 24.58 $ (409)

Summary of Results for Option 2 - quarterly sampling

Model 

Size (gpm) TCI ($)

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits ($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 4,224 $ 3,795 $ 3,107 1.38 $ 2,258

 15,000 $ 4,224 $ 3,795 $ 1,731 4.13 $ 419

 40,000 $ 4,224 $ 3,795 $ (1,709) 11.01 $ (155)

 110,000 $ 4,224 $ 3,795 $ (11,342) 30.27 $ (375)

Summary of Results for Option 3 - monthly sampling

Model 

Size (gpm) TCI ($)

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits ($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 4,224 $ 5,368 $ 4,651 1.43 $ 3,244

 15,000 $ 4,224 $ 5,368 $ 3,218 4.30 $ 748

 40,000 $ 4,224 $ 5,368 $ (366) 11.47 $ (32)

 110,000 $ 4,224 $ 5,368 $ (10,402) 31.54 $ (330)

Summary of Results for Option 4 - weekly sampling

Model 

Size (gpm) TCI ($)

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits ($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 4,224 $ 13,231 $ 12,503 1.46 $ 8,589

 15,000 $ 4,224 $ 13,231 $ 11,047 4.37 $ 2,530

 40,000 $ 4,224 $ 13,231 $ 7,408 11.65 $ 636

 110,000 $ 4,224 $ 13,231 $ (2,782) 32.03 $ (87)

Summary of Results for Option 5 - continuous sampling

Model 

Size (gpm) TCI ($)

Ave. TAC 

($/yr)

Ave. TAC 

w/recovery 

credits ($/yr)

VOC Emiss 

Reduction 

(tons/yr)

Cost-Effect 

($/tons)

 5,000 $ 24,611 $ 16,689 $ 15,958 1.46 $ 10,913

 15,000 $ 24,611 $ 16,689 $ 14,495 4.39 $ 3,304

 40,000 $ 24,611 $ 16,689 $ 10,840 11.70 $ 927

 110,000 $ 24,611 $ 16,689 $ 603 32.17 $ 19



5000 16894.58 8135.625 7433.098 1.405054 5290.257

15000 16894.58 8135.625 6028.044 4.215163 1430.086

40000 16894.58 8135.625 2515.408 11.24043 223.7821

100000 16894.58 8135.625 -5914.92 28.10109 -210.487
5000 16894.58 8135.625 7433.098 1.405054 5290.257

15000 16894.58 8135.625 6028.044 4.215163 1430.086

40000 16894.58 8135.625 2515.408 11.24043 223.7821

100000 16894.58 8135.625 -5914.92 28.10109 -210.487