alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

                              FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED IN THE  COMPANY'S  FORM 10-K FOR THE
TWELVE  MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       7,136,943
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  854,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                   134,000
<INVENTORY>                                     46,087
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,287,222
<PP&E>                                       1,531,043
<DEPRECIATION>                                 945,335
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,775,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,657,376
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,623
<COMMON>                                        18,233
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,821,747
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,775,436
<SALES>                                      4,965,680
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,965,680
<CGS>                                        1,111,147
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,650,823
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (676,443)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,307,892)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,307,892)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (372,052)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,952,189)
<EPS-BASIC>                              (.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.59)


</TABLE>
#### § 35.25-1 Examination of boilers and machinery by engineer—T/ALL.

It shall be the duty of an engineer when assuming charge of the boilers to examine the same forthwith and thoroughly. If any part thereof is found in bad condition, the engineer shall immediately report the facts to the master, owner, or agent, and to the nearest Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.

[CGD 95-027, 61 FR 26000, May 23, 1996]
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105
- 2498

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION January 1 8 , 2011 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with the National Association of Clean Air Agencies (NACAA) FROM: Angela Cullen TO: Docket EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2010
- 0162 This memorandum documents a meeting held on Friday , January 1 4 , 2011 b etween NACAA and EPA and included the following individuals: NACAA: Nancy

Kruger , NESCAUM, and Air Agencies from South Coast Air Quality Management District, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Pennsy lvania, Tennessee, Washington, Wisconsin, San Diego, and Memphis, TN EPA: By ron Bunker and Angela Cull en As part of the discussion, EPA provided a broad overview of the proposed Heav y - Duty Greenhouse Gas Emissions program
. In addition, EPA provided clarification on the proposed hy brid technology

provisions, exemption of trailers, and the exclusion of CO2 emissions d ue to PM regeneration during the engine test cy cle.
**U.S. Access Board: Rail Vehicle s**  **Access Advisory Committee Subcommittee on**  **Boarding and Alighting Meeting #4** 

**July 24 , 2014**  **1:0 0**  **– 3**  **:00 Eastern** 1.0 Introductions 2.0 Approval of the Agenda 3.0 Review of assigned tasks 3.1 Discuss PRIIA specification status 3.2 Review d raft of vehicle

- based ramps and bridgeplates, if available 4 .0 Discussion of boarding and alighting devices 4 .1 Review of current law and regulations and develope recommendations A. Lifts B. Ramps C. Bridge plate s 5 .0 Planning 5 .1 Develop action i tems 5 .2 Assign duties and t asks 5 .3 Establish deadlines for d eliverables 6 .0 Next meeting Thursday, August 28th , 1:00 – 3:00 Eastern
Attachments
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have  issued our report  dated  March 16,  1999  accompanying  the  financial
statements included in the Annual Report of ModaCAD, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the
year  ended  December  31,  1998.  We hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by
reference  of said report in the  Registration  Statements  of ModaCAD,  Inc. on
Forms S-8 (#333-61443,  dated August 14, 1998), S-8 (#333-35987, dated September
19, 1997),  S-3/A (#333-26349,  dated June 18, 1997),  S-3/A (#333-26691,  dated
June 18, 1997), and S-8 (#333-21775, dated February 14, 1997).



SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 31, 1999
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 101 (Friday, May 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 29339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2589]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Nursing Research; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Nursing Research 
Initial Review Group.
    Date: June 14-15, 2007.
    Time: 8:15 am. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Jeffrey M. Chernak, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Review, National Institute of Nursing 
Research, 6701 Democracy Plaza, Suite 710, MSC 4870, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 402-6959, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#55363d30273b343e3f1538343c397b3b3c3d7b323a23"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6a09020f18040b01002a070b030644040302440d051c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.361, 
Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 17, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2589 Filed 5-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2014315EN.01004502.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/45

---

Order of the President of the Court of 5 June 2014 — El Corte Inglés, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Emilio Pucci International BV

(Case C-584/12 P) (1)

1

2014/C 315/73

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 2.3.2013.

1

---
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending March 18, 2006

----

Bank Holding CompaniesSociete Generale, Paris, France  -- to engage in physical commodity trading activities on a limited basis in the United States.					-Approved, March 14, 2006 					

EnforcementDoral Financial Corporation, San Juan, Puerto Rico  -- issuance of a consent cease and desist order.					-Announced, March 17, 2006 					First BanCorp, Santurce, Puerto Rico  -- issuance of a consent cease and desist order.					-Announced, March 17, 2006 					R&G Financial Corporation, Hato Rey, San Juan, Puerto Rico  -- issuance of a consent cease and desist order.					-Announced, March 17, 2006 					

Regulations And PoliciesRegulation K (International Banking Operations)  -- final amendments to require compliance programs under the Bank Secrecy Act (Docket No. R-1147).					-Approved, March 13, 2006 					

Reserve Bank ServicesFederal Reserve Currency Recirculation Policy  -- revisions to reduce the overuse of Reserve Bank cash-processing services by providing incentives for depository institutions to recirculate currency among their customers.					-Approved, March 15, 2006 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: March 23, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Columbia Futures Fund and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       8,772,635
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,953<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,151,779<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,151,779<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               386,899<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               660,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (273,101)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (273,101)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (273,101)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $29,368 and due from
DWR of $585.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $349,191.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $61,592, accrued
management fees of $30,085 and administrative expenses payable of
$96,129.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $269,671,
net change in unrealized of $(149,913) and interest income of $267,141.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Argued and submitted October 16,

appeal dismissed November 29, 1995

#### In the Matter of the Application of Carol Alongi for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Carol ALONGI, *Appellant, v.*James and Joyce YOUNG, *Respondents.*In re the Guardianship of Aleta Alongi, a Minor Protected Person. James R. YOUNG and Joyce Young, *Respondents, v.*Carol ALONGI, *Appellant.*

(16-92-01441; CA A75632 (Control))

(51-92-00624; CA A75684)

907 P2d 250

*117Michael Schumann argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Zan Tewksbury and Steenson & Schumann, P.C.

John A. Hudson argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

LANDAU, J.

*118LANDAU, J.

In 1992, the trial court granted respondents’ *ex parte*motion for appointment of a temporary guardian of appellant’s (mother’s) daughter, then 15-1/2 years old. The court dismissed mother’s contemporaneous petition for a writ of habeas corpus. After a hearing, the trial court found mother unfit, appointed defendants to be guardians of the daughter and ordered mother to pay child support to defendants. Mother appealed, assigning error to the appointment of defendants as temporary guardians, the dismissal of her petition for a writ of habeas corpus, the trial court’s decision that mother was unfit and the failure of the court to send the entire matter to juvenile court. After extensive preargument motions, the matter was argued October 16, 1995. We now dismiss the appeal as moot.

Under ORS 126.060(1), a person becomes a guardian of a “minor” upon appointment by the court. A “minor” is ‘ ‘any unmarried person who is younger than 18 years of age. ’ ’ ORS 126.003(7). Once an appointment has been made, it “continues until terminated.” ORS 126.060(1). A guardianship terminates

> “upon the death, resignation or removal of the guardian *or upon the minor’s** * * *attainment of majority.”*

ORS 126.085(1). (Emphasis supplied.)

In this case, the daughter is now 19 years old. She is no *longer*a minor, and, under ORS 126.085(1), the guardianship that is the object of mother’s legal challenge has been terminated by operation of law. Any order from this court declaring the invalidity of the guardianship would be academic. *See Smith v. Smith et al,*209 Or 96, 98, 304 P2d 421 (1956); *Naito v. Naito,*99 Or App 608, 611, 783 P2d 1012 (1989).

Mother argues that, although the guardianship has already ended, her appeal is not moot, because an order declaring the invalidity of the guardianship would have the indirect effect of invalidating the order requiring her to pay child support. We are not persuaded. First, mother does not assign error to the order requiring her to pay child support. Second, there is no evidence in the record before us that the child support has not been paid completely as ordered by the *119court. There is, therefore, no affirmative evidence that an order from this court “ ‘will have a practical effect on or concerning the rights of the parties.’ ” *Barcik v. Kubiaczyk,*321 Or 174, 182, 895 P2d 765 (1995), *citing Brumnett v. PSRB,*315 Or 402, 406, 848 P2d 1194 (1993).

Appeal dismissed.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, 

Appellant

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, 

Appellee

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., ATI 

TECHNOLOGIES ULC, 

Intervenors

______________________

2024-1613

______________________

Appeal from the United States International Trade 

Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-1318.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

Case: 24-1613 Document: 28 Page: 1 Filed: 07/01/2024
2 REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION V. ITC

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

July 1, 2024

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: July 1, 2024

Case: 24-1613 Document: 28 Page: 2 Filed: 07/01/2024
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.01


                       LIST OF REGISTRANT'S SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         JURISDICTION OF      PERCENTAGE OWNED       DATE OF 
NAME                                      ORGANIZATION         BY REGISTRANT        FORMATION
----                                     ---------------      ----------------      --------- 
<S>                                          <C>                    <C>                <C> 
Prism Data Warehouse Solutions Ltd.          England                100%               1995
Prism Solutions Iberica S.L.                 Spain                  100                1995
Prism Solutions GmbH                         Germany                100                1996
Prism Solutions SARL                         France                 100                1996
Prism Solutions Netherlands BV               Holland                100                1997
Prism Solutions Asia Pacific Pty Ltd.        Australia              100                1997
Prism Solutions Asia Pacific Ltd.            New Zealand            100                1997
Prism Solutions Hong Kong Ltd.               Hong Kong              100                1997
Prism Solutions Singapore Ltd.               Singapore              100                1997
Prism Solutions Mexico                       Mexico                 100                1996
Prism Solutions Canada                       Canada                 100                1996
Prism Solutions SARL                         Switzerland            100                1998
</TABLE>
§ 183.130 Alternative standards. ( a ) A vessel, other than a high speed craft, of not more than 19.8 meters (65 feet) in length carrying not more than 12 passengers, may comply with the following requirements instead of complying with the requirements of this part in their entirety: ( 1 ) Section 183.420; and
( 2 ) The following American Boat and Yacht Council (ABYC) Projects where applicable: ( i ) E-8, “Alternating Current (AC) Electrical Systems on Boats;”
( ii ) E-9, “Direct Current (DC) Electrical Systems on Boats;” and
( iii ) A-16, “Electrical Navigation Lights.”
( b ) A vessel with an electrical installation operating at less than 50 volts may meet the requirements in 33 CFR 183.430 instead of those in § 183.340 of this part.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 997, Jan. 10, 1996; 61 FR 20557, May 7, 1996, as amended by CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51050, Sept. 30, 1997]
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Pop N Go, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Melvin Wyman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |                                                    
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  May 20, 2008 | By: /s/ Melvin Wyman                               
|                     | Melvin Wyman                                       
|                     | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Logged onto EDMS as

public

logon :: preferences

Find Documents

Document Search

Public Records Req

Help

About EDMS

FAQ

Troubleshooting

Guides & Manuals

Contact Us

What's New?

Document Search

EDMS documents are not viewable in the latest version of Chrome. Click here for more details.

AI Lookup AI TEMPO Activity Number

Date Between  - Description 



Document ID

Media





Accident Prevention

Air Quality

Asbestos

Biosolids

Ground Water

Hazardous Waste

Inactive & Abandoned Sites

Document Type





Analytical Data

Boards and Commissions

Compliance

Correspondence-Internal

Correspondence-Received

Correspondence-Sent

Financial

Function





Agency Governance

Air Emissions Inventory

Air Modeling

Air Monitoring and Analysis

Air Planning

Air Stack and Tank Testing

Aquifer Evaluation and Protection

Document Subtype





ADVF

Agreement/Contract

Air

Annual

Application

Application-Personal Affidavit

Assessment/Investigation

Run Count Reset

EDMS @ LOUISIANA DEQ Page 1 of 1

http://edms.deq.louisiana.gov/app/doc/querydef.aspx 12/23/2015
#### § 350.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to prescribe regulations to implement the Merchant Marine Decorations and Medals Act of 1988, 46 App. USC 2001, *et seq.,* to authorize the issue of decorations, medals, and other recognition for service in the U.S. merchant marine, and for other purposes, and to provide for the replacement of awards previously issued for service in the United States Merchant Marine under prior law.
#### § 30.10-39 Liquefied flammable gas—TB/ALL.

The term *liquefied flammable gas* means any flammable gas having a Reid vapor pressure exceeding 40 pounds, which has been liquefied.

[CGFR 66-33, 31 FR 15267, Dec. 6, 1966]
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

450 CA 10-01699 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ.

JANE RENNIE BLAKE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KENNETH DARCY BLAKE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

WATSON, BENNETT, COLLIGAN & SCHECHTER LLP, BUFFALO (KRISTIN L. ARCURI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, WILLIAMSVILLE (DENIS A. SCINTA OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John F. O’Donnell, J.), entered July 15, 2010 in a divorce action. The order denied the quantum meruit application of defendant’s attorney for counsel fees. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Blake v Blake ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Apr. 29, 2011]).

Entered: April 29, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court