alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Relating to a Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements



I, William J. Reuter, Chief Executive Officer, and Drew K. Hostetter, Chief Financial Officer, of Susquehanna Bancshares, Inc. (the Company),
hereby certify that, based on our knowledge:



(1) The
Companys periodic report containing financial statements on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: As of August 8, 2005



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |  | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
|                        | 
|/s/ William J. Reuter   |  | /s/ Drew K. Hostetter  
|William J. Reuter       |  | Drew K. Hostetter
# C_2013225EN.01005001.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/50

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2013 — Transports Schiocchet — Excursions SARL v Council of the European Union, European Commission

(Case C-397/12 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Appeal manifestly unfounded and manifestly inadmissible - No failure to state reasons - Imprecise ground of appeal - Ground of appeal seeking reconsideration of the application at first instance)

2013/C 225/88

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Transports Schiocchet — Excursions SARL (represented by: E Deshoulières, avocat)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: E. Karlsson and E. Dumitriu-Segnana, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: N. Yerrell and J. Hottiaux, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 June 2012 in Case T-203/11 Schiocchet v Council and Commission, by which the General Court rejected as manifestly unfounded in law an application for compensation of a loss allegedly suffered due to the application of the system laid down in Council Regulation (EEC) No 684/92 of 16 March 1992 on common rules for the international carriage of passengers by coach and bus (OJ 1992 L 74, p. 1) — Conditions on which an action for compensation may be brought — Wrongful act of an institution

Schiocchet

Council and Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Transports Schiocchet — Excursions SARL shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Transports Schiocchet — Excursions SARL shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 331, 27.10.2012.

1

---
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1180 CAF 11-01008**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, SCONIERS, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF JUSTIN LINDELL, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
LYDIA BEARFIELD, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

ERICKSON WEBB SCOLTON & HAJDU, LAKEWOOD (LYLE T. HAJDU OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
MICHAEL J. SULLIVAN, FREDONIA, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
ALLISON B. MULLEN CARROW, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, JAMESTOWN, FOR ALLONA B.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Chautauqua County (Judith S. Claire, J.), entered August 16, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order awarded the parties joint custody of their child, with placement to petitioner.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: November 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          51,505
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,544
<ALLOWANCES>                                       125
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,817
<PP&E>                                           4,060
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,952
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,284
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,145
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           166
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,467
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,284
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,269
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,506
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,241
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,612
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,324
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,287
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,149
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,139
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 99.15****CONSENT OF EXPERT**     Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Cameco Corporation (the“Company”) to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.     I hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name under the heading “The NuclearBusiness — Reserves and Resources” in the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year endedDecember 31, 2007 dated March 28, 2008 (the “AIF”), under the heading “Qualified Persons” inManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation for the yearended December 31, 2007(the “MD&A”) and in the 40-F, and to disclosure of a scientific andtechnical nature pursuant to which I have acted in a supervisory capacity under the heading “TheNuclear Business — Reserves and Resources” of the AIF and under the heading “Qualified Persons” inthe MD&A.     Sincerely,
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference  in the  registration statement  of
V-ONE Corporation on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-43795)  and the Registration
Statement of V-ONE Corporation on Form  S-8  (Registration No. 333-17749) of our
report dated March 13, 1998,  on our audits of the financial statements of V-ONE
Corporation as of December 31, 1997 and  1996  and for the three fiscal years in
the period ended December 31, 1997,  which report is included on page 38 in this
Form 10-K.



                                                    /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.




McLean, Virginia
March 30, 1998
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2546 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 20, 2010 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To ensure that the right of an individual to display the 

Service Flag on residential property not be abridged. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2546 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Blue Star/Gold Star 

3 Flag Act of 2010’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

5 For purposes of this Act— 

6 (1) the term ‘‘Service Flag’’ has the meaning 

7 given such term under section 901 of Public Law 

8 105–225 (36 U.S.C. 901); 

9 (2) the terms ‘‘condominium association’’ and 

10 ‘‘cooperative association’’ have the meanings given 

11 such terms under section 604 of Public Law 96–399 

12 (15 U.S.C. 3603); 

13 (3) the term ‘‘residential real estate manage14 ment association’’ has the meaning given such term 

15 under section 528 of the Internal Revenue Code of 

16 1986 (26 U.S.C. 528); and 

17 (4) the term ‘‘member’’— 

18 (A) as used with respect to a condominium 

19 association, means an owner of a condominium 

20 unit (as defined under section 604 of Public 

21 Law 96–399 (15 U.S.C. 3603)) within such as22 sociation; 

23 (B) as used with respect to a cooperative 

24 association, means a cooperative unit owner (as 

25 defined under section 604 of Public Law 96– 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2546 RFS

1 399 (15 U.S.C. 3603)) within such association; 

2 and 

3 (C) as used with respect to a residential 

4 real estate management association, means an 

5 owner of a residential property within a subdivi6 sion, development, or similar area subject to 

7 any policy or restriction adopted by such asso8 ciation. 

9 SEC. 3. RIGHT TO DISPLAY THE SERVICE FLAG. 

10 A condominium association, cooperative association, 

11 or residential real estate management association may not 

12 adopt or enforce any policy, or enter into any agreement, 

13 that would restrict or prevent a member of the association 

14 from displaying the Service Flag on residential property 

15 within the association with respect to which such member 

16 has a separate ownership interest or a right to exclusive 

17 possession or use. 

18 SEC. 4. LIMITATIONS. 

19 Nothing in this Act shall be considered to permit any 

20 display or use that is inconsistent with— 

21 (1) any regulations prescribed by the United 

22 States Secretary of Defense regarding rules or cus23 toms pertaining to the proper display or use of the 

24 Service Flag; or 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 2546 RFS

1 (2) any reasonable restriction pertaining to the 

2 time, place, or manner of displaying the Service Flag 

3 necessary to protect a substantial interest of the 

4 condominium association, cooperative association, or 

5 residential real estate management association. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 19, 2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32



Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Relating to a Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements



I, William J. Reuter, Chief Executive Officer, and Drew K. Hostetter, Chief Financial Officer, of Susquehanna Bancshares, Inc. (the Company),
hereby certify that, based on our knowledge:



(1) The
Companys periodic report containing financial statements on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: As of November 7, 2005



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |  |  |  | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
|                        |  | 
|/s/ William J. Reuter   |  |  |  | /s/ Drew K. Hostetter  
|William J. Reuter       |  |  |  | Drew K. Hostetter      



37
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE>                9

<S>                                      <C>

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<CASH>                                       22,315
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          432
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             78,650
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                  0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  47,665
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       15,560
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         15,479
<LOANS>                                     115,966
<ALLOWANCE>                                   5,458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              287,026
<DEPOSITS>                                  266,821
<SHORT-TERM>                                      0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           2,541
<LONG-TERM>                                     679
<COMMON>                                     16,985
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                        0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              287,026
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               9,306
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             3,029
<INTEREST-OTHER>                              2,150
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             14,485
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            2,643
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            2,680
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        11,805
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                 4,547
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              11,302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               1,332
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    1,332
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  1,332
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.66
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 6.31
<LOANS-NON>                                  12,481
<LOANS-PAST>                                      0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                  0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              5,873
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                 5,433
<RECOVERIES>                                   (471)
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             5,458
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          5,458
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           0



</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49223, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60144, Sept. 30, 2013.

#### § 2.01-80 Vessel inspections in Alaska.

(a) The waters of southeastern Alaska inside of the general trend of the shore from Cape Spencer, southeasterly to Cape Muzon, and thence easterly to Sitklan Island, shall be considered as bays, sounds, and lakes other than the Great Lakes, for the purpose of administering the vessel inspection laws and applicable regulations in this chapter.
#### Frederica M. Kinney, *Appellamt, v.*William D. Nichols and Adelbert S. Nichols, *Respondents*.

Order affirmed, with costs . and disbursements. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JONATHAN JOSEPH GOOD,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 15-12064

DENNIS HEYNS, C/O Cerny, RUM PEET, HON. AVERN COHN

SERGEANT LEVY, HEARING INVESTIGATOR

SCOTT, GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR

PARSONS, and DEPUTY WARDEN

MCCULLICK, 

Defendants.

_______________________________/

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 77)

AND

GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 72)

AND

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Doc. 70) AND

MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION (Doc. 75)

AND

DISMISSING CASE

I.

This is a prisoner civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff James

Mitchell, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against twenty-one (21) defendants and

presenting multiple claims. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge for pretrial

proceedings. See Doc. 6. Following motions and the adoption of the magistrate judge’s

report and recommendation, the case was pared down to five claims against six

defendants: Director Heyns, C/O Cerny, RUM Peet, Sergeant Levy, Hearing
Investigator Scott, Grievance Coordinator Parsons, and Deputy Warden McCullick (Doc.

50). In general, plaintiff claims stem from a Class II ticket for insolence that defendant

C/O Cerny issued and of which plaintiff was found guilty following a hearing, resulting in

two days of lost privileges. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on all

remaining claims. (Doc. 72). Plaintiff filed a motion for an order to show cause (Doc.

70) and a motion to strike defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 75). On May

25, 2017, the magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation (MJRR),

recommending that defendants’ motion be granted and plaintiff’s motions be denied. 

Neither party has objected to the MJRR and the time for filing objections has passed.1

II.

The failure to file objections to the MJRR waives any further right to appeal. 

Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). 

Likewise, the failure to object to the MJRR releases the Court from its duty to

independently review the motions. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). 

However, the Court has reviewed the MJRR and agrees with the magistrate judge’s

analysis and conclusion. 

III.

Accordingly, for the reasons stated above, the MJRR is ADOPTED as the

findings and conclusions of the Court. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is

1

On June 8, 2017, the day objections were due, plaintiff filed a motion for

extension of time in which to file objections, asking for a 60 day extension, or until

August 3, 2017. (Doc. 79). The Court granted the motion in part, permitting plaintiff

until July 24, 2017 in which to file objections. See text only order on June 21, 2017. 

Both dates have passed.

2
GRANTED. Plaintiff’s motion for an order to show cause and motion to strike

defendants’ motion are DENIED. This case is DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

S/Avern Cohn 

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: August 10, 2017

Detroit, Michigan

3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,961,148
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,428,124
<ALLOWANCES>                                    33,000
<INVENTORY>                                    115,573
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,190,103
<PP&E>                                         543,475
<DEPRECIATION>                                 220,883
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,814,793
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,216,411
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     7,004,897
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,406,515)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,814,793
<SALES>                                      2,069,928
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,069,928
<CGS>                                        1,249,854
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,249,854
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (92,746)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        
         

</TABLE>
§ 177.300 Structural design. Except as otherwise allowed by this subpart, a vessel must comply with the structural design requirements of one of the standards listed below for the hull material of the vessel. ( a ) Wooden hull vessels: Lloyd's Yachts and Small Craft (incorporated by reference, see 46 CFR 175.600);
( b ) Steel hull vessels: ( 1 ) Lloyd's Yachts and Small Craft; or
( 2 ) ABS Steel Vessel Rules (<61 Meters)(incorporated by reference, see 46 CFR 175.600);
( c ) Fiber reinforced plastic vessels: ( 1 ) Lloyd's Yachts and Small Craft;
( 2 ) ABS Plastic Vessel Rules (incorporated by reference, see 46 CFR 175.600); or
( 3 ) ABS High Speed Craft (incorporated by reference, see 46 CFR 175.600);
( d ) Aluminum hull vessels: ( 1 ) Lloyd's Yachts and Small Craft; or ( i ) For a vessel of more than 30.5 meters (100 feet) in length: ABS Aluminum Vessel Rules (incorporated by reference, see 46 CFR 175.600); or
( ii ) For a vessel of not more than 30.5 meters (100 feet) in length: ABS Steel Vessel Rules (<61 Meters), with the appropriate conversions from the ABS Aluminum Vessel Rules; or
( 2 ) ABS High Speed Craft;
( e ) Steel hull vessels operating in protected waters: ABS Steel Vessel Rules (Rivers/Intracoastal) (incorporated by reference, see 46 CFR 175.600).
[USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65205, Oct. 31, 2008]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         436,253
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,664,954
<ALLOWANCES>                                    68,885
<INVENTORY>                                     15,484
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,047,806
<PP&E>                                         392,226
<DEPRECIATION>                                 182,942
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,265,329
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,102,385
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,265,329
<SALES>                                      7,356,883
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,356,883
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,730,632
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              47,211
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (420,960)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   155,057
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (265,903)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>