alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2821 CALVIN CHILDS-BEY, Individually and on behalf of himself, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusMIKE BICKMEYER, Individually and in his official capacity as "Assistant Director"; SCOTTMEESE, Individually and in his official capacity as "Purchasing Manager"; BRENDA J. KEITH, Individually and in her official capacity as "Director of Nutrition Services" of Marriott Corporation; MARRIOTT CORPORATION, in its official capacity as a "Municipal Corporation" Health Care Services, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-608-B) Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 22, 1997 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.1 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e)-16 (1994). 2 42 U.S.C. § 12101-12132 (1994). 2 Calvin Childs-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Michael Topolski, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in a discrimination case filed under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII); 1 the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); 2 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986 (1994); and various state laws. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Childs-Bey v. Bickmeyer , No. CA-95-608-B (D. Md. Nov. 21, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Marvin H. Roseman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Phoenix Waste Services Company, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year ended April 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Phoenix Waste Services Company, Inc.


                                                 By:  /s/ Marvin H. Roseman
                                                 Name: Marvin H. Roseman
                                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer


I, Marvin H. Roseman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Phoenix Waste Services Company, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year ended April 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Phoenix Waste Services Company, Inc.


                                                  By: /s/ Marvin H. Roseman
                                                  Name: Marvin H. Roseman
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer
Form of Grant Letter




			
	 


 


	 	 ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
 2500 COLUMBIA AVE., P.O. BOX 3001
 LANCASTER, PA 17604
  
 717.397.0611         www.armstrong.com


  
 Exhibit 10.1

  
 PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL 
  
 <NAME> 
 <TITLE> 
  
 Dear <FIRSTNAME>:

  
 Subject: 2005 Cash Retention Payment 
  
 As Armstrong World Industries prepares to emerge from its Chapter 11 bankruptcy
reorganization, we recognize the importance of retaining those key employees who are vital to the company’s current and future success. Recently, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved a 2005 cash retention payment program that will apply to a
limited number of key employees for this purpose. 
  
 I am very pleased to offer
you participation in this special retention program with a cash retention payment of <AMOUNT> which represents <PERCENT> of your current annualized base salary. This payment will be made to you on or about December 29, 2005 as long as
you continue your employment with Armstrong until this scheduled payment date. If Armstrong World Industries emerges from Chapter 11 reorganization prior to December 29, 2005, you will remain eligible for the full cash retention payment at
year end contingent on your continued employment. If your employment is terminated for any reason, voluntarily or involuntarily, prior to December 29, 2005, you will be ineligible for the retention payment. 
  
 This retention payment will not be counted for purposes of benefit determination under the
company’s employee benefit plans (pension, savings, life insurance). 
  
 It
is important that you keep the details of this cash retention payment confidential. You should not assume that your manager or associates are participants in this program. Eligibility was not determined solely by grade level. 
  
 On behalf of the Office of the Chairman, we congratulate you on your participation in this
special retention program. We are confident that you will continue to make significant contributions to Armstrong’s success and provide the leadership necessary to achieve our future goals. 
  
 If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact me or Scott Webster.

  
 Sincerely, 
  
 Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
§ 190.20-10 Location of crew spaces. ( a ) Crew quarters must not be located farther forward in the vessel than a vertical plane located at 5 percent of the vessel's length abaft the forward side of the stem at the designated summer load water line. However, for vessels in other than ocean or coastwise service, this distance need not exceed 8.5 meters (28 feet). For purpose of this paragraph, the vessel's length shall be as defined in § 43.15-1 of subchapter E (Load Lines) of this chapter. Unless approved by the Commandant, no section of the deck head of the crew spaces may be below the deepest load line.
( b ) There must be no direct communication, except through solid, close fitted doors or hatches between crew spaces and chain lockers, or machinery spaces.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

                                THIRD AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                           REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT
                                 BY AND BETWEEN
        TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC. AND AERIAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

    This Third Amendment (the "Third Amendment") to the Revolving Credit
Agreement dated as of August 1, 1995, as previously amended (the "Revolving
Credit Agreement") by and between Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. ("TDS"), an
Iowa corporation, and Aerial Communications, Inc. ("Company"), a Delaware
corporation is effective this 29th day of August, 1997.

    WHEREAS TDS and the Company entered into the Revolving Credit Agreement
dated and made effective as of August 1, 1995, which Revolving Credit Agreement
was subsequently amended effective as of December 31, 1995 (the "First
Amendment"); and August 7, 1997 (the "Second Amendment"); and

    WHEREAS TDS continues to own certain of the issued and outstanding shares of
the capital stock of the Company; and

    WHEREAS, the Company has identified a need for additional funds and TDS
agrees to provide the Company certain additional funds for specified purposes
under terms more particularly set forth in the Revolving Credit Agreement; and

    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises set forth above, and for
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound, TDS and the Company agree to
amend the Revolving Credit Agreement as follows:

    1. All references to "$300,000,000.00" shall be changed to
"$425,000,000.00".

    TDS's obligation to furnish additional funds under the Revolving Credit
Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 1998. However, in the event that TDS's
ownership of the Company shall fall below 70%, the Revolving Credit Agreement
shall expire 6 months after such date.

    All other terms and conditions of the Revolving Credit Agreement shall
remain unchanged and in full force and effect. All defined terms contained in
the Revolving Credit Agreement are hereby incorporated into this Third Amendment
and shall have the same meaning herein as in the Revolving Credit Agreement,
unless otherwise defined herein.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, by their duly authorized
representatives, have executed this Third Amendment to the Revolving Credit
Agreement, effective as of the date first written above.

<TABLE>
<S>                                         <C>
TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC.            AERIAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

By: /s/ MURRAY L. SWANSON                   By: /s/ J. CLARKE SMITH
  --------------------------------------    ----------------------------------------
Name: Murray L. Swanson                     Name: J. Clarke Smith
Title: Executive Vice President -           Title: Vice President Finance &
Finance                                     Administration
Date: 08/29/97                              Date: 08/29/97
------------------------------------------  ------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lakes Entertainment, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lyle
Berman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                             /s/ Lyle Berman
                                             -----------------------
                                             Lyle Berman
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             August 13, 2003
#### Sprague *et al.*v. Gardiner *et al.*

Appeal from circuit court, Lawrence county. Hon. Chas. M. Thomas, Judge.

Action in attachment by Otho S. A. Sprague and others affainst Charles H. Gardiner and another. From an order discharging the writ issued, plaintiffs appeal.

Affirmed.

*Wood S Buell*and *McLaughlin & McLaughlin,*for appellants.

*Martin & Mason,*for-respondents.

Corson, P. J.

This case was submitted upon the abstract and arguments in Mercantile Co. v. Same Defendants, 5 S. D.— 58 N. W. 557; the facts in both cases being the same. - For the reasons given in the opinion in that case, filed this term, the order of the circuit court discharging the attachment in this case is affirmed.
#### Beverly Haight and Susan Haight, Respondents, *v.*The Continental Insurance Company of the City of New York, *Appellants*.

Order setting aside nonsuit affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Dykman, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2519 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2519

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the deduction of 
  attorney-advanced expenses and court costs in contingency fee cases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 2009

Mr. Davis of Alabama (for himself and Mr. King of New York) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the deduction of 
  attorney-advanced expenses and court costs in contingency fee cases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UNIFORM TREATMENT OF ATTORNEY-ADVANCED EXPENSES AND COURT 
              COSTS IN CONTINGENCY FEE CASES.

    (a) In General.--Section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to trade or business expenses) is amended by redesignating 
subsection (q) as subsection (r) and by inserting after subsection (p) 
the following new subsection:
    ``(q) Attorney-Advanced Expenses and Court Costs in Contingency Fee 
Cases.--In the case of any expense or court cost which is paid or 
incurred in the course of the trade or business of practicing law and 
the repayment of which is contingent on a recovery by judgment or 
settlement in the action to which such expense or cost relates, the 
deduction under subsection (a) shall be determined as if such expense 
or cost was not subject to repayment.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to expenses and costs paid or incurred in taxable years beginning after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

                               CERTIFICATION UNDER
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     To my  knowledge,  this report on Form 10-QSB  (the  "Report")  for Peoples
Bankcorp,  Inc. (the  "Company")  for the six months ended June 30, 2003,  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934,  and the  information  contained  in this  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects,  the consolidated  financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company.

                                 PEOPLES BANKCORP, INC.

                                 By:/s/Robert E. Wilson
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Robert E. Wilson
                                    President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                    Financial Officer


Date:  August 13, 2003
# C_2012118EN.01001401.xml

| 21.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/14

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen Sad — Varna (Bulgaria) lodged on 7 February 2012 — Galin Kostov v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto’ -grad Varna pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite

(Case C-62/12)

2012/C 118/21

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Referring court

Administrativen Sad — Varna

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Galin Kostov

Applicant:

Defendant: Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto’ -grad Varna pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is a natural person who is registered for VAT by reason of his activity as a private bailiff to be regarded as a taxable person within the meaning of Article 9(1) of Directive 2006/112 (1) and required, pursuant to Article 193 of Directive 2006/112, to pay VAT in respect of a service which he has provided on an occasional basis and not in connection with his activity as a private bailiff?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

1

---
Exhibit 10.1


 


MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc.


Summary of Director Compensation


 


For 2005, each non-employee director of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. will receive:


 


•                  an annual retainer of $18,000,


 


•                  $2,000 regular meeting attendance fee,


 


•                  $1,000 committee meeting attendance fee, and


 


•                  1,000 restricted shares.


 


The Chair of
the Audit Committee will receive an additional $4,000.  Employee directors receive no additional
compensation for serving as directors. 
Directors will be reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in
connection with attending board and committee meeting or performing their
duties as directors.
#### § 32.20-5 Pressure vacuum relief valves—TB/ALL.

The pressure vacuum relief valve shall be of a type and size approved by the Commandant for the purpose intended. For specifications and procedures re approval, see subpart 162.017 of subchapter Q (Specifications) of this chapter.
EXHIBIT 32



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of New CF&I, Inc. ("New CF&I"), and CF&I
Steel, L.P. ("CF&I") on Form 10-K for the quarterly period ended December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, James E Declusin, President and CEO of New CF&I and CF&I,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78c(d)); and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of New CF&I and
     CF&I..



/s/ James E. Declusin
--------------------------------
James E. Declusin
President & CEO


March 30, 2004



/s/ L. Ray Adams
---------------------------------
L. Ray Adams
Vice President - Finance,
Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer

March 30, 2004
EXHIBIT 99.18
 CONSENT OF EXPERT
   (a)
    
    under the headings The Nuclear Business  Reserves and Resources, The Nuclear
Business  Mining Properties  McArthur River and Interest of Experts in the
Corporations Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2009 dated March
31, 2010 for the McArthur River/Key Lake properties; and(b)
    
    under the heading Reserves and Resources in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation for the year ended December 31,
2009 dated February 23, 2010 for the McArthur River/Key Lake properties,
    /s/ Gregory M. MurdockName:
    
    Gregory M. Murdock, P. Eng.Title:
    
    Technical Superintendent, McArthur River, Cameco CorporationDate:
    
    March 31, 2010
# C_2013225EN.01005703.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/57

---

Order of the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of 23 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam — Netherlands) — Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV, TUI Airlines Nederland BV, trading under the name ArkeFly v Staatssecretaris van Infrastructuur en Milieu

(Case C-227/12) (1)

1

2013/C 225/114

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 250, 18.8.2012.

1

---
#### Eliza Ann Longendyke and another, *Respondents, v.*Charles Anderson, *Appellant.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Boardman, J.
#### Vilas National Bank of Platsburgh, *Respondent, v.*Elric L. Moore and others, *Appellants*.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and motion for judgment on frivolousness of answer denied, with ten dollars costs. Opinions by

Learned, P. J., and Landon, J.
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.1 Filed 06/23/15 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.2 Filed 06/23/15 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.3 Filed 06/23/15 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.4 Filed 06/23/15 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.5 Filed 06/23/15 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.6 Filed 06/23/15 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.7 Filed 06/23/15 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.8 Filed 06/23/15 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.9 Filed 06/23/15 Page 9 of 9
A-9(A) Model Opt-Out Form for Account Opening
 

EXPLANATION OF OVERDRAFT COVERAGE 

Overview of Coverage 

We currently provide overdraft coverage for your account. This means that if you attempt to spend or 

withdraw more money than you have in your account, we may decide to pay the overdrawn amount. 

Having overdraft coverage does not guarantee that we will pay your overdrafts. If we do, we will charge 

you fees. This coverage differs from other overdraft services we offer, such as linking your account to 

another account with us or an overdraft line of credit. 

Your Right to Opt Out of Overdraft Coverage 

You may tell us not to pay overdrafts for ATM withdrawals and debit card purchases you make at 

a store, online, or by telephone. [If you do, we will decline these transactions if you do not have 

enough money in your account to cover them.] As a result, you may pay fewer overdraft fees. 

Your decision to opt out will not affect whether we pay overdrafts for other types of transactions, 

including checks. We may still cover these transactions and charge you a fee. See below for more 

information about your overdraft coverage, including how to contact us to opt out. 

Overdraft Fees 

 We will charge you a fee of [up to] [$__] each time that we pay an overdraft. 

 We will also charge you a fee of [$__] for each day your account remains overdrawn. 

 [There is no limit on the daily fees we can charge you for overdrawing your account.] 

Other Ways We Can Cover Your Overdrafts 

We offer other ways of covering your overdrafts that may be less expensive, such as linking your account 

to another account with us or an overdraft line of credit. Contact us to learn more about these options. 

How to Opt Out or Get More Information 

To opt out of our overdraft coverage, or for information about alternatives we offer for covering 

overdrafts, please: [include as applicable] 

 Contact us at 1-8xx-xxx-xxxx. 

 Contact us at [insert Internet address]. 

 Complete the form below and mail it to [insert address]. 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

___ I do not want overdraft coverage for my ATM withdrawals and debit card purchases. 

Printed Name: _________________________ 

Date: _________________________ 

Account Number: _________________________