alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.13
 CONSENT OF EXPERT
   (a)
    
    under the headings The Nuclear Business  Reserves and Resources, The Nuclear
Business  Mining Properties  McArthur River, The Nuclear Business  Development
Projects  Cigar Lake and Interest of Experts in the Corporations Annual Information
Form for the year ended December 31, 2008 dated March 27, 2009 for the McArthur
River/Key Lake and the Cigar Lake properties; and(b)
    
    under the headings Our Mineral Reserves and Resources  Mineral Reserves and
Resources and Qualified Persons in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation for the year ended December 31, 2008 dated February
16, 2009 for the McArthur River/Key Lake and the Cigar Lake properties,
    /s/Alain G. MainvilleName:
    
    Alain G. Mainville, P. Geo.Title:
    
    Director, Mineral Resources Management, 
Cameco Corporation
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

Certification

Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2008 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, James R. Edmondson, Vice President of Accounting of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of            2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| /s/James R. Edmondson        |
|------------------------------|
| James R. Edmondson           |
| Vice President of Accounting |
| March 27, 2009               |
|                         |
#### § 188.01-15 OMB control numbers assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

(a) *Purpose.* This section collects and displays the control numbers assigned to information collection and recordkeeping requirements in this subchapter by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). The Coast Guard intends that this section comply with the requirements of 44 U.S.C. 3507(f), which requires that agencies display a current control number assigned by the Director of the OMB for each approved agency information collection requirement.

(b) *Display.*

| 46 CFR part or section where identified or described | Current OMB control No. |
| --- | --- |
| § 189.40-3 | 1625-0032 |
| § 189.40-5 | 1625-0032 |
| § 196.15-7 | 1625-0064 |
| § 196.15-18 | 1625-0064 |

[CGD 88-072, 53 FR 34298, Sept. 6, 1988, as amended by CGD 89-037, 57 FR 41828, Sept. 11, 1992; USCG-2004-18884, 69 FR 58351, Sept. 30, 2004]
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

Versata Software, Inc. f/k/a Trilogy 

Software, Inc., Versata Development 

Group, Inc., and Trilogy, Inc., 

 Plaintiffs/ 

 Counter-Defendants, 

v. 

Ford Motor Company, 

 Defendants/ 

 Counter-Plaintiffs.

Case No. 15-10628-MFL-EAS 

(consolidated with Case No. 15-cv-11624) 

Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

ORDER GRANTING VERSATA’S EX PARTE MOTION TO FILE ITS 

TRIAL BRIEF REGARDING FORD’S CLAIMED IMPLEMENTATION 

OF DESIGN-AROUNDS AND EXHIBITS 

UNDER SEAL 

 Upon review and consideration of Versata’s Motion to File Its Trial Brief 

Regarding Ford’s Claimed Implementation of Design-Arounds and Exhibits Under 

Seal, the Court GRANTS the motion. Versata may publicly file redacted versions 

of these papers, and under seal may file unredacted versions of those documents. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: October 18, 2022 

Case 2:15-cv-10628-MFL-EAS ECF No. 984, PageID.64258 Filed 10/18/22 Page 1 of 2
2 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on October 18, 2022, by electronic means and/or ordinary 

mail. 

 s/Holly A. Ryan 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5126

Case 2:15-cv-10628-MFL-EAS ECF No. 984, PageID.64259 Filed 10/18/22 Page 2 of 2
# C_2014212EN.01000701.xml

| 7.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 May 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands)) — T.C. Briels and Others v Minister van Infrastructuur en Milieu

(Case C-521/12) (1)

1

((Environment - Directive 92/43/EEC - Article 6(3) and (4) - Conservation of natural habitats - Special areas of conservation - Assessment of the implications for a protected site of a plan or project - Authorisation for a plan or project on a protected site - Compensatory measures - Natura 2000 site Vlijmens Ven, Moerputten & Bossche Broek - Project on the route of the A2 ‘s-Hertogenbosch-Eindhoven motorway))

2014/C 212/07

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: T.C. Briels, M. Briels-Loermans, R.L.P. Buchholtz, Stichting A2-Platform Boxtel e.o. and Others, H.W.G. Cox, G.P.A. Damman, P.A.M. Goevaers and Others, J.H. van Haaren, L.S.P. Dijkman, R.A.H.M. Janssen, M.M. van Lanschot, J.E.A.M. Lelijveld and Others, A. Mes and Others, A.J.J. Michels, VOF Isphording and Others, M. Peijnenborg, S. Peijnenborg-van Oers, G. Oude Elferink, W. Punte, P.M. Punte-Cammaert, Stichting Reinier van Arkel, E. de Ridder, W.C.M.A.J.G. van Rijckevorsel, M. van Rijckevorsel-van Asch van Wijck, Vereniging tot Behoud van het Groene Hart van Brabant, Stichting Boom en Bosch, Stichting Overlast A2 Vught e.o., Streekraad Het Groene Woud en De Meijerij, A.C.M.W. Teulings, Stichting Bleijendijk, M. Tilman, Vereniging van Eigenaars Appartementengebouw De Heun I and Others, M.C.T. Veroude, E.J.A.M. Widlak, Van Roosmalen Sales BV and Others, M.A.A. van Kessel, Bricorama BV and Others

Applicants:

Defendant: Minister van Infrastructuur en Milieu

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Raad van State — Interpretation of Article 6(3) and (4) of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ 1992 L 206, p. 7) — Authorisation of a plan or project on a protected site — Conditions — ‘Concept of adverse effect on the integrity of the site concerned’

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 6(3) of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora must be interpreted as meaning that a plan or project not directly connected with or necessary to the management of a site of Community importance, which has negative implications for a type of natural habitat present thereon and which provides for the creation of an area of equal or greater size of the same natural habitat type within the same site, has an effect on the integrity of that site. Such measures can be categorised as ‘compensatory measures’ within the meaning of Article 6(4) only if the conditions laid down therein are satisfied.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 23.2.2013.

1

---
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending May 27, 2006

|Filer                          | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------------ | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|FRONTIER FINANCIAL CORPORATION | * 3A3         | Frontier Financial Corporation, Everett, Washington, to acquire 12.2 percent of Skagit State Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire shares in its subsidiary, Skagit State Bank, both of Burlington, Washington. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:06/09/2006
|Newspaper:                     | Not available
|Federal Register:              | 06/09/2006   
|SAN JOAQUIN BANCORP            | * 3A1         | San Joaquin Bancorp to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of San Joaquin Bank, both of Bakersfield, California.                                                                                     | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:06/09/2006
|Newspaper:                     | Not available
|Federal Register:              | 06/09/2006   
|SILVER STATE BANCORP           | * 3A3         | Silver State Bancorp, Henderson, Nevada, to acquire 100 percent of Choice Bank, Scottsdale, Arizona.                                                                                                                    | Newspaper:06/08/2006Federal Register:06/11/2006   
|Newspaper:                     | 06/08/2006   
|Federal Register:              | 06/11/2006   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

EARL D. WILSON,

Plaintiff, Case Number 15-10747

Honorable David M. Lawson

v. 

TROTT LAW, P.C.,

Defendant.

________________________________________/

CORRECTED ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION 

FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION, DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO 

ADJOURN CLASS CERTIFICATION HEARING, PERMITTING LIMITED

DISCOVERY, AND SCHEDULING DATES

On April 29, 2015, the Court entered an order denying without prejudice the plaintiff’s

motion for class certification, denying as moot motion to adjourn class certification hearing,

permitting limited discovery, and scheduling dates. Counsel for the defendant filed a motion on

May 4, 2015 identifying a discrepancy in the Court’s order permitting limited discovery. The Court

has determined that its order was in error and therefore enters this corrected order clarifying that the

plaintiff may conduct limited discovery to respond to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. 

Presently before the Court is the plaintiff’s motion for class certification. The Court held a

case management conference on April 29, 2015. At the case management conference, the plaintiff

asked the Court to adjourn the hearing on the plaintiff’s motion for class certification and to permit

the parties to conduct limited discovery before responding to the defendant’s motion for summary

judgment. The defendant consented to the plaintiff’s requests at the case management conference. 

2:15-cv-10747-DML-APP Doc # 24 Filed 05/07/15 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 592
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the parties may conduct limited discovery for purposes

of responding to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The parties must complete

discovery on or before May 22, 2015.

It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff shall respond to the defendant’s motion for

summary judgment on or before June 1, 2015.

It is further ORDERED that a hearing on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is

scheduled for June 24, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. 

It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion for class certification [dkt. #3] is

DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See Sivak v. United Parcel Service Company, No. 13-15263

(Jan. 21, 2014) (denying as premature motion for class certification). 

It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion to adjourn the hearing on his motion for

class certification [dkt. #15] is DENIED as moot.

It is further ORDERED that the case management and scheduling conference is

ADJOURNED without date. 

It is further ORDERED that the defendant’s objection to order and motion to amend [dkt.

#23] is DENIED as moot.

s/David M. Lawson 

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

Dated: May 7, 2015

-2-

2:15-cv-10747-DML-APP Doc # 24 Filed 05/07/15 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 593
 

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on May 7, 2015.

/s Susan Pinkowski 

SUSAN PINKOWSKI

-3-

2:15-cv-10747-DML-APP Doc # 24 Filed 05/07/15 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 594
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation 
by reference in this Form 10-K of Aerial Communications, Inc., of our report 
dated January 27, 1999 (except with respect to the matter discussed in Note 10, 
as to which the date is March 15, 1999), on the consolidated financial 
statements of Aerial Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") 
included in the Company's 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders, to the 
inclusion in this Form 10-K of our report dated January 27, 1999 (except with 
respect to the matter discussed in Note 10, as to which the date is March 15, 
1999), on the financial statement schedule of the Company, and to the 
incorporation by reference of such reports into the Company's previously 
filed S-8 Registration Statements, File No. 333-06471, File No. 333-10201, 
File No. 333-26429, File No.333-67461 and File No. 333-51561.
 
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
 
Chicago, Illinois
March 30, 1999
#### James Gibbs Ross, *Respondent, v.*Rinaldo H. Stillwell, *Appellant.*

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
2:15-cv-11691-MAG-RSW Doc # 5 Filed 05/27/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 28
§ 169.201 When required. ( a ) No sailing school vessel shall be operated without a valid Certificate of Inspection, Form CG-3753.
( b ) Except as noted in this subpart, each sailing school vessel inspected and certificated under the provisions of this subchapter must, during the tenure of the certificate, be in full compliance with the terms of the certificate when carrying six or more individuals who are sailing school students or sailing school instructors.
( c ) If necessary to prevent delay of the vessel, a temporary Certificate of Inspection, Form CG-854, is issued pending the issuance and delivery of the regular Certificate of Inspection, Form CG-3753. The temporary certificate is carried in the same manner as the regular certificate and is considered the same as the regular certificate of inspection which it represents.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1



                             i2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       JURISDICTION
                                                        IN WHICH
     NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                 ORGANIZED
-------------------------------               -----------------------------
<S>                                           <C> 
i2 Technologies Pty Ltd.                      Australia
iTWO Technologies Exports, Inc.               Barbados
i2 Technologies N.V./S.A.                     Belgium
i2 Technologies do Brasil Ltda.               Brazil
i2 Technologies (Canada), Inc.                Canada
InterTrans Logistics Solutions Ltd.           Canada
i2 Technologies (Cayman Islands) Ltd.         Cayman Islands
i2 Technologies A/S                           Denmark
i2 Technologies Oy                            Finland
i2 Technologies SARL                          France
i2 Technologies, GmbH                         Germany
Think Systems Private Limited                 India
i2 Technologies Srl                           Italy
i2 Technologies Japan, Inc.                   Japan
i2 Technologies (Korea), Inc.                 Korea
i2 Technologies (Mexico) S. de R.L.           Mexico
i2 Technologies (Netherlands) B.V.            Netherlands
InterTrans Logistics Solutions BV             Netherlands
i2 Technologies (N.A.) N.V.                   Netherlands Antilles
i2 Technologies PTE Limited                   Singapore
MStar Pty Ltd.                                South Africa
InterTrans Logistics AG                       Switzerland
i2 Technologies (Taiwan) Inc.                 Taiwan
i2 Technologies, Limited                      United Kingdom
i2 Technologies International Services, Inc.  United States
InterTrans Logistics Corp.                    United States
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                      MATRIA HEALTHCARE, INC. SUBSIDIARIES
                                 March 25, 2002

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       Jurisdiction of
             Name                                                      Incorporation
             ----                                                      -------------
<S>                                                                    <C>
*Clinical-Management Systems, Inc.                                     Georgia
*Diabetes Management Services, Inc.                                    South Carolina
Diabetes Acquisition, Inc.                                             Georgia
         Gainor Medical Acquisition Company                            Georgia
         Diabetes Management Solutions, Inc.                           Delaware
         Diabetes Self Care, Inc.                                      Virginia
         Facet Technologies, L.L.C.                                    Georgia
         Facet Technologies Limited                                    United Kingdom
         Matria Holding GmbH                                           Germany (LLC)
         eu- Medical GmbH                                              Germany (LLC)
         Dia Real GmbH & Co. KG                                        Germany (LLC)
Matria of New York, Inc.                                               New York
Matria Healthcare Puerto Rico, Inc.                                    Puerto Rico
Matria Laboratories, Inc.                                              Delaware
*National Reproductive Medical Centers, Inc.                           Delaware
         *Infertility Management Services, Inc.                        Delaware
         *PFCC Liquidation Corp.                                       California
         *PFPC Liquidation Corp.                                       California
         *PFMG Liquidation Corp.                                       California
*Perinatal Services Nederland B.V.                                     Nederlands
*Q Liquidation Corp.                                                   Delaware
*Shared Care, Inc.                                                     Georgia
</TABLE>

*Inactive

Note: The above subsidiaries (except for Perinatal Services Nederland B.V. and
Matria Healthcare Puerto Rico, Inc., both in which Matria owns a 51% interest)
are directly or indirectly 100% owned by Matria Healthcare, Inc.
#### § 201.93 Review of ruling, appeal.

The order of the presiding officer denying a motion for summary disposition shall be subject to interlocutory appeal under the provisions of § 201.123. An order granting a motion for summary disposition is automatically reviewable by the Administration in accordance with the provisions of § 201.133 and shall not be final until acted upon by the Administration.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1993 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1993

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the first-time 
                           homebuyer credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2009

 Mr. Courtney introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the first-time 
                           homebuyer credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``First-Time Homebuyer Credit 
Extension Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER CREDIT.

    (a) Extension of Credit.--Subsection (h) of section 36 of the 
Internal Revenue Code is amended by striking ``December 1, 2009'' and 
inserting ``January 1, 2011''.
    (b) Extension of Waiver of Recapture.--Subparagraph (D) of section 
36(f)(4) of such Code is amended--
            (1) by striking ``December 31, 2008, and before December 1, 
        2009'' and inserting ``April 8, 2008, and before January 1, 
        2011'', and
            (2) in the heading by striking ``for purchases in 2009''.
    (c) Election To Treat Purchase in Prior Year.--Subsection (g) of 
such Code is amended to read as follows:
    ``(g) Election To Treat Purchase in Prior Year.--For purposes of 
this section (other than subsections (c) and (f)(4)(D)), a taxpayer may 
elect to treat a purchase of a principal residence--
            ``(1) after December 31, 2008, and before January 1, 2010, 
        as made on December 31, 2008, and
            ``(2) after December 31, 2009, and before January 1, 2011, 
        as made on December 31, 2009.''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```