alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                        FRED MEYER, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)
                                   (Unaudited)


                                                           12 Weeks Ended                   28 Weeks Ended
                                                       ----------------------           ----------------------
                                                       Aug. 16,       Aug. 17,          Aug. 16,       Aug. 17,
                                                          1997           1996              1997           1996
                                                        ------         ------            ------         ------
<S>                                                    <C>            <C>               <C>             <C>    
Weighted average number of
  shares outstanding................................... 26,717         26,722            26,607         26,713

Weighted average number of
  shares under option..................................  2,684          4,218             2,880          3,935

Shares assumed to have been
  purchased under the
  treasury stock method...............................  (1,297)        (2,237)           (1,547)        (2,039)
                                                       -------        -------           -------         -------
Weighted average number of
  common and common equivalent
  shares outstanding..................................  28,104         28,703            27,940          28,609
                                                       =======        =======           =======         =======

Net income ........................................... $19,120        $15,173           $32,379         $24,617
                                                       =======        =======           =======         =======

Earnings per common share.............................    $.68           $.53             $1.16            $.86
                                                       =======        =======           =======         =======
</TABLE>
§ 38.01-5 Certificate of inspection—TB/ALL. ( a ) The certificate of inspection shall be endorsed for the carriage of liquefied flammable gases as follows: Inspected and approved for the carriage of liquefied flammable gases (1) at a pressure not to exceed ___ p.s.i., and (2) at temperatures not less than __ °F.
( b ) Tanks approved to carry cargoes at below ambient temperatures shall have the applicable limiting temperatures indicated on the certificate. Tanks designed to carry cargoes only at ambient temperatures should have the word “ambient” entered in these spaces.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter
Ended September 30, 2010 (the "Report") by American Medical Alert Corp.
("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
  and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Registrant.





Date:  November
15, 2010





/s/ Jack RhianJack
      RhianChief
      Executive Officer andPresident




A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to American Medical Alert Corp. and will be retained by American
Medical Alert Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

STATE OF INDIANA,

Plaintiff,

v.

AMERICAN FURUKAWA, INC., ET AL.

Defendants.

Case Nos. 2:13-cv-00105; 2:15-cv12309

Judge: Hon. Sean F. Cox 

Magistrate Judge: Hon. R. Steven 

Whalen

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY 

DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff State of

Indiana (“Plaintiff”) hereby gives notice of its voluntary dismissal with prejudice of Defendants

K&S Wiring Systems, Inc., Sumitomo Electric Wiring Systems, Inc., Sumitomo Wiring Systems

(USA), Inc., Sumitomo Wiring Systems, Ltd., and Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. (together,

the “Sumitomo Defendants”), with each Party to bear its own fees and costs. None of the

Sumitomo Defendants has filed an answer or motion for summary judgment with respect to any

complaint filed by Plaintiff in this action.

Dated: March 14, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Kevin Abraham Rynbrandt

Kevin Abraham Rynbrandt

Rynbrandt & Associates PLLC

1000 Front Avenue, N.W.

Grand Rapids, MI 49504

Indiana Attorney General’s Office

Indiana Government Building South

302 West Washington Street

5th Floor

Indianapolis, IN 46204

Case 2:15-cv-12309-SFC-RSW ECF No. 39, PageID.288 Filed 03/14/22 Page 1 of 3
2

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 2:15-cv-12309-SFC-RSW ECF No. 39, PageID.289 Filed 03/14/22 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 14th day of March, 2022, I caused a true and correct copy of 

the foregoing NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL to be electronically filed with the 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all 

counsel of record.

/s/ Kevin Abraham Rynbrandt

Case 2:15-cv-12309-SFC-RSW ECF No. 39, PageID.290 Filed 03/14/22 Page 3 of 3
§ 402.320 Working rules. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76354 , Sept. 17, 2024.
( a ) Sections 401.320(d)(2) and (6) of this chapter require that voluntary associations of U.S. Registered Pilots authorized to establish pilotage pools agree to submit Working Rules for approval of the Director and that they will coordinate their pool operations with Canada on a reciprocal basis. The following approved Working Rules are on file in the office of the Director and are available for public inspection by any person properly and directly concerned: ( 1 ) The Working Rules and Dispatching Procedures for the designated waters of District No. 1 adopted by the St. Lawrence Seaway Pilots' Association, Inc., Cape Vincent, N.Y., dated May 1, 1980, amended to March 24, 1999.
( 2 ) The Working Rules and Dispatch Procedures for the undesignated waters of District No. 1 adopted by the St. Lawrence Seaway Pilots' Association, Inc., Cape Vincent, N.Y., dated July 27, 1982.
( 3 ) The Working Rules, Dispatching Procedures, and General Rules of District No. 2 adopted by the Lakes Pilots Association, Inc., Port Huron, MI., dated March 30, 1999.
( 4 ) The Working Rules for District No. 3, adopted by the Western Great Lakes Pilots Association, LLP, Superior, WI., dated February 24, 2001 amended to February 28, 2007.
( b ) [Reserved]
[USCG-2008-0906, 73 FR 56511, Sept. 29, 2008]
§ 190.20-1 Application. ( a ) Except as noted below, the provisions of this subpart apply to all vessels contracted for on or after March 1, 1968.
( b ) Vessels contracted for prior to March 1, 1968, must meet the requirements of § 190.20-90.
#### § 351.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to set forth the criteria necessary for depositories of funds under all programs authorized by the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended (46 U.S.C. 1101 *et seq.*) (Act).

[38 FR 8061, Mar. 28, 1973]
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2016-3696

Directorate Identifier: 2015NM113AD

A320-27-1242 --- 2/9/15

47145-27-17, R1 --- 7/21/15

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          64,346
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  376,657
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,302
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               444,161
<PP&E>                                         115,156
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,703
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 643,569
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          319,888
<BONDS>                                         32,914 
<COMMON>                                           346
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     310,094
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   643,569
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,133,151
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  773,450
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               196,521
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   805
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,089
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 55,820
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,876
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,944
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,944
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .99
        

</TABLE>
#### EDWIN FARRELL v. HERBERT E. NELSON.

Decided November 4, 1929.

Before Gummebe, Chief Justice, and Justices Pabkeb and Bobine.

Eor the rule, *George F. Seymour, Jr.*

*Conira, Edmund A. Hayes.*

Peb Cubiam.

The plaintiff, a boy six years old, while crossing a street in the town of Dunellen in front of the public school where he was a pupil, was struck by a taxicab belonging to the defendant and being driven by the latter’s employe. The suit was brought to recover compensation for the injuries received by *958the plaintiff. The trial resulted in a verdict in favor of the boy of $3,000. The defendant thereupon applied for a rule to show cause why this verdict should not be set aside and a new trial granted. As a result of the application the court granted the rule limiting, however, the grounds to be considered upon the return thereof to two points: First, whether or not the verdict was against the weight of the evidence; and second, whether or not it was excessive.

Counsel for the defendant contends before us that the verdict, which necessarily was based upon the ground that the accident was the result of the negligence of the driver of the defendant’s taxicab and was not contributed to by the plaintiff, was contrary to the weight of the evidence. Our examination of the testimony sent up with the rule satisfied us that we should not interfere with the verdict upon this ground.

The only other question before us for consideration under the limitation of the rule is whether the award was excessive. Our consideration of the testimony with relation to the injuries received by the plaintiff satisfies us that we ought not to interfere with the verdict upon the ground stated; that is, that it is clearly excessive.

The rule to show cause will be discharged.
ICY SPLASH FOOD AND BEVERAGE, INC.

STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,                            2000             1999
                                                    -----------      -----------

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Net (loss) income                                   $   (23,049)     $     1,785
                                                    -----------      -----------

Weighted average shares outstanding                   6,600,000        6,600,000
                                                    -----------      -----------

Basic earnings per share
                                                    $      --        $      --
                                                    ===========      ===========
Diluted earnings per share:

Net (loss) income                                   $   (23,049)     $     1,785
                                                    -----------      -----------

Weighted average and dilutive shares:
    Weighted average shares outstanding               6,600,000        6,600,000
    Dilutive shares (Antidilutive in 2000)                 --            950,000
                                                    -----------      -----------
                                                      6,600,000        7,550,000
                                                    -----------      -----------

Diluted earnings per share                          $      --        $      --
                                                    ===========      ===========
§ 38.10-15 Safety relief valves—TB/ALL. ( a ) Each tank shall be fitted with or (subject to approval by the Commandant) connected to one or more safety relief valves designed, constructed and flow tested for capacity in conformance with subpart 162.017 or 162.018 of subchapter Q (Specifications) of this chapter.
( b ) Safety relief valves conforming to subpart 162.017 of subchapter Q (Specifications) of this chapter may be used on tanks for a maximum pressure of 10 pounds per square inch gage. Safety relief valves conforming to subpart 162.018 of subchapter Q (Specifications) of this chapter may be used for any pressure.
( c ) The safety relief valves shall have a combined relieving capacity to discharge the greater of the following with not more than 20 percent rise in pressure (in the tank) above the maximum allowable pressure: ( 1 ) The vapors evaporated by an ambient air temperature of 115 °F. plus the maximum flow rate of the cargo filling pipes or,
( 2 ) The vapors generated under fire exposure computed using the formulas of § 54.15-25(c) of subchapter F (Marine Engineering) of this chapter.
( d ) The safety relief valves shall meet the arrangement and inspection requirements of § 54.15-25 of subchapter F (Marine Engineering) of this chapter.
( e ) Means shall be provided to protect nonpressure vessel tanks from excessive external pressure.
( f ) Void spaces between the primary and secondary barriers of nonpressure vessel type tanks shall be protected by relief devices. The relief setting shall not be higher than the void test pressure, and shall not exceed 90 percent of the setting of the safety relief valve protecting the primary tank.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18807, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58280, Sept. 29, 2014]
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                         5
<CIK>                             0001071157
<NAME>                            SPORTSMAN'S WHOLESALE COMPANY

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     03-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                  5,096
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                          19,502
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                             6,457
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       31,055
<PP&E>                                 28,381
<DEPRECIATION>                         (3,833)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         55,603
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   7,926
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                  160
<OTHER-SE>                             47,517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           55,603
<SALES>                                 1,631
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        1,631
<CGS>                                   1,314
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           1,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       15,859
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (15,542)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                          (15,542)
<EPS-BASIC>                             .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                             .03


</TABLE>
§ 194.15-19 Electrical. ( a ) All electrical equipment located within 18 inches of the deck of the chemical laboratory shall be in accordance with the applicable requirements of Subchapter J (Electrical Engineering) of this chapter for Class I, Division 2, hazardous locations. Electrical equipment located 18 inches or more above the deck may be of a type suitable for wet or dry locations in accordance with Subchapter J.
# C_2013225EN.01005706.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/57

---

Order of the President of the Court of 27 March 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-330/12) (1)

1

2013/C 225/117

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 287, 22.9.2012.

1

---
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 26, 2011

h0919 

# Order

September 26, 2011

142416(33)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142416 COA: 298318 MICHAEL TODD DAVIS, Maco mb CC: 2006-001180-FH Defendant-Appellant. 2006 -001181-FH; 2006-001182-FH 2006-001183-FH ; 2006-001528-FH

___________________ _________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s July 25, 2011 order is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          61,491
<SECURITIES>                                    93,387
<RECEIVABLES>                                  126,033
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,406
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               295,145
<PP&E>                                          50,080
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,964
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 339,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          103,801
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                     234,957
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   339,224
<SALES>                                        230,961
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               361,916
<CGS>                                            7,959
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  331,571
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (6,917)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,640
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 179
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,262
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,279
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,983
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,983
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 129 (Monday, July 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 38285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2014-15386]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Microgrid Competition

Correction

    In notice document 2014-15386 beginning on page 37303 in the issue 
of Tuesday, July 1, 2014, make the following correction:
    On page 37306, in the third column, under ``IX. Contact 
Information,'' starting in the second line, 
Microgrid;Competition@hq.doe.gov should read 
MicrogridCompetition@hq.doe.gov.

[FR Doc. C1-2014-15386 Filed 7-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
#### § 310.67 Academy regulations.

The Superintendent of the Academy is delegated authority to issue all regulations necessary for the accomplishment of the Academy's mission.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.3 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Cameco Corporation (the Company) on Form 40-F
for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Gerald W. Grandey, President & Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. By:
    
    /s/ Gerald W. GrandeyGerald W. GrandeyPresident & Chief Executive Officer
 March 15, 2005
#### John R. Magruder, *Respondent, v.*The Terrible Mining Company, *Appellant*.

Order affirmed with ten dollar’s costs and disbursements. Opinion

*Per Curiam.*
Editorial Note on Part 356
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 356 appear at 68 FR 5576, Feb. 4, 2003.

§ 356.9 Tiered ownership structures. Non-Citizens may not own or control, either directly through the first tier of ownership or in the aggregate through an interest in other entities at various tiers, more than 25% of the interest in an entity which owns a Fishing Industry Vessel. The prohibition against Non-Citizens owning or controlling more than 25%, in the aggregate, of the interest in an entity that owns a Fishing Industry Vessel means, for example, that: ( a ) Non-Citizens that own or control a 25% stake in the ownership entity of a Fishing Industry Vessel at the first tier may not have any interest whatsoever in any entity that is being relied upon to establish the required 75% U.S. Citizen ownership; and
( b ) Non-Citizens that own or control less than a 25% stake at the first tier may participate in the ownership and control of other entities that are being relied upon to establish the required 75% U.S. Citizen ownership and control at the first tier. However, the total ownership and control by Non-Citizens of the entity owning a Fishing Industry Vessel may not exceed 25% in the aggregate as computed by MARAD.