alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012209EN.01000402.xml

| 14.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/4

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundespatentgericht (Germany), lodged on 3 May 2012 — Sumitomo Chemical Co. Ltd

(Case C-210/12)

2012/C 209/06

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundespatentgericht

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Appellant: Sumitomo Chemical Co. Ltd

Appellant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1610/96 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 concerning the creation of a supplementary protection certificate for plant protection products (1) to be interpreted as not precluding the grant of a supplementary protection certificate for a plant protection product if a valid marketing authorisation was granted in accordance with Article 8(4) of Directive 91/414/EEC? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1610/96 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 concerning the creation of a supplementary protection certificate for plant protection products (1) to be interpreted as not precluding the grant of a supplementary protection certificate for a plant protection product if a valid marketing authorisation was granted in accordance with Article 8(4) of Directive 91/414/EEC?

1

| 2. | If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative:
  Is it necessary under Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1610/96 for the marketing authorisation to be still in force at the time of application for the certificate? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative:

Is it necessary under Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1610/96 for the marketing authorisation to be still in force at the time of application for the certificate?

| 3. | If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative:
  Is Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1610/96 to be interpreted as meaning that an application can be lodged even before the period mentioned in that provision starts to run? |
| --- | --- |

3.

If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative:

Is Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1610/96 to be interpreted as meaning that an application can be lodged even before the period mentioned in that provision starts to run?

---

(1)  OJ 1996 L 198, p. 30.

1

---
§ 128.420 Keel cooler installations. ( a ) Except as provided by this section, each keel cooler installation must comply with § 56.50-96 of this chapter.
( b ) Approved metallic flexible connections may be located below the deepest-load waterline if the system is a closed loop below the waterline and if its vent is located above the waterline.
( c ) Fillet welds may be used in the attachment of channels and half-round pipe sections to the bottom of the vessel.
( d ) Short lengths of approved non-metallic flexible hose fixed by metallic or non-metallic hose-clamps may be used at machinery connections if— ( 1 ) The clamps are of a corrosion-resistant material;
( 2 ) The clamps do not depend on spring tension for their holding power; and
( 3 ) Two of the clamps are used on each end of the hose, except that one clamp may be used on an end expanded or beaded to provide a positive stop against hose slippage.
( 4 ) The clamps are resistant to vibration, high temperature, and brittleness.
[CGD 82-004 and CGD 86-074, 62 FR 49331, Sept. 19, 1997, as amended by USCG-2000-7790, 65 FR 58463, Sept. 29, 2000]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

# Date and Time:

Wednesday, May 23, 2007, 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time.

# Place:

Clarence M. Mitchell, Jr. Conference Room on the Ninth Floor of the EEOC Office Building, 1801 “L” Street, NW., Washington, DC 20507.

# Status:

The meeting will be open to the public.

# Matters to be Considered:

*Open Session:*

1. Announcement of Notation Votes, and

2. Achieving Work/Family Balance: Employer Best Practices for Workers with Caregiving Responsibilities

# Note:

                        In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the meeting will be open to the public observation of the Commission's deliberations and voting. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC Commission meetings in the                         **Federal Register**                        , the Commission also provides a recorded announcement a full week in advance on future Commission sessions.)                    

Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at any time for information on these meetings. The EEOC provides sign language interpretation at Commission meetings for the hearing impaired. Requests for other reasonable accommodations may be made by using the voice and TTY numbers listed above. 

# Contact Person for More Information:

Stephen Llewellyn, Acting Executive Officer on (202) 663-4070.

This Notice Issued May 14, 2007.

Stephen Llewellyn,

Acting Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 07-2453 Filed 5-14-07; 1:24 pm]

BILLING CODE 6570-01-M
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pac-West Telecomm, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2003 (the Report), I,
Wallace W. Griffin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| |                                                                                               
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Wallace W. Griffin

Wallace W. Griffin
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
March 17, 2003





---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pac-West Telecomm, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2003 (the Report), I,
H. Ravi Brar, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| |                                                                      
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ H. Ravi Brar

H. Ravi Brar
Chief Financial Officer
March 17, 2003
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending February 10, 2007

|Filer                   | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                      | End of Comment Period                                  
|----------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|FIA CARD SERVICES, N.A. | Investment     | FIA Card Services, N.A., Wilmington, Delaware, to make a series of investments in four subsidiaries. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:              | Not applicable
|Federal Register:       | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending December 2, 2006

|Filer              | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------ | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|FIRST CAPITAL BANK | * Branch       | First Capital Bank, Glen Allen, Virginia, proposes to establish a branch at 901 East Cary Street, Richmond, Virginia. | Newspaper:12/15/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:         | 12/15/2006    
|Federal Register:  | Not applicable
|MIDDLEBURG BANK    | * Branch       | Middleburg Bank, Middleburg, Virginia, proposes to establish a branch at 8383 West Main Street, Marshall, Virginia.   | Newspaper:12/08/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:         | 12/08/2006    
|Federal Register:  | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2467 

To provide for semiannual actuarial studies of the FHA mortgage insurance 

program of the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2009 

Mr. LYNCH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To provide for semiannual actuarial studies of the FHA 

mortgage insurance program of the Secretary of Housing 

and Urban Development. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FHA Enhanced Over5 sight Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SEMIANNUAL ACTUARIAL STUDIES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (4) of section 202(a) 

8 of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1708(a)(4)) is 

9 amended— 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2467 IH

1 (1) in the paragraph heading, by striking ‘‘AN2 NUAL’’ and inserting ‘‘SEMIANNUAL’’; 

3 (2) in the first sentence— 

4 (A) by striking ‘‘annually’’ and inserting 

5 ‘‘semiannually’’; and 

6 (B) by inserting before the period at the 

7 end the following: ‘‘as of September 30 and 

8 March 31 of each fiscal year’’; and 

9 (3) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘annu10 ally’’ and inserting ‘‘for each such semiannual 

11 study’’; and 

12 (4) in the third and fourth sentences, by strik13 ing ‘‘The report’’ each place such term appears and 

14 inserting ‘‘Each such report’’. 

15 (b) INITIAL REPORT.—The first semiannual report 

16 on the financial position of the Mutual Mortgage Insur17 ance Fund required by section 202(a)(4) of the National 

18 Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1708(a)(4)), as amended by sub19 section (a) of this section, shall be submitted with respect 

20 to such position as of the first September 30 or March 

21 31 occurring after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Case 2:15-cv-11222-SFC-DRG ECF No. 44-2, PageID.773 Filed 05/02/16 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:15-cv-11222-SFC-DRG ECF No. 44-2, PageID.774 Filed 05/02/16 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:15-cv-11222-SFC-DRG ECF No. 44-2, PageID.775 Filed 05/02/16 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:15-cv-11222-SFC-DRG ECF No. 44-2, PageID.776 Filed 05/02/16 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 10.5


 


DESCRIPTION OF
EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN 

AND SUMMARY FORMS OF NOTICE


 


Date:                                          


To:                                                    


From:                                        


Re:                               Executive
Incentive Plan for FY     


 


The Board of Directors has approved our Executive Incentive Plan for FY
      . 
Your annual target bonus under this plan is      %
of your annual base salary.  The
provisions of the plan are listed below:


 


• Payout
requires achievement of both plan revenue and operating profit for the Company.


• We must
also have a positive operating profit for payout.


• This year
we will divide the plan into both a quarterly and an annual plan (both based on
the above criteria).


• 50% of
your target incentive will be for the quarterly plan (i.e., 1/8 per quarter) and
50% of your target incentive will be for the annual plan.


 





















 


Date:                                          


To:                                                    


From:                                        


Re:                               Your
FY      Compensation Plan


 


Attached is your compensation plan for FY     .  The Board of Directors recently approved this
in the           
meeting.  In addition, you are eligible
to participate in the Corporate Executive Incentive plan with a target bonus of
     % of your annual base salary.  The criteria for the corporate plan are as
follows:


 


• Measurement
will be on an annual basis.


• Payout
requires achievement of both annual revenue and operating profit plan.


• We must
have a positive operating profit for payout.


 


2
|   |  i. | The                  report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act 1934;                  and |
|--------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |  ii. | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  January                22,                2008 |   | /s/              THOMAS A.              WAGNER                                           |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                             |   | Name:              Thomas A. Wagner                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |   |
|                                                             |   | Title:              Chief Financial              Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |   |
|                                                             |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |   |
#### Pierson, Appellant, v. Wilton, Appellee.

Appellate Pbactice — Weight oe Evidence.

Where there is testimony in the record to support the conclusions reached by the court below, the judgment will not be disturbed on the ground that it is not sustained by the evidence.

*Appeal from the County Court of Pitkin County.*

Mr. Wil. O’Brien, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Richmond, P. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action to recover for services rendered. It was originally commenced before a justice of the peace of Pitkin county, where judgment was rendered for Samuel Wilton, appellee. Thereafter on appeal the cause was tried in the county court and judgment rendered for the sum of $104.41. To reverse this judgment this appeal was prosecuted to the supreme court, and by order of that court transferred to this.

The sole ground relied upon is that the evidence does not sustain the judgment. It is sufficient fop us to say that after reading the abstract we are of the opinion that there is testimony to support the conclusions reached by the justice of the, peace and the county judge, and that under the innumerable decisions of the supreme court, as well as a large number of decisions by this" court, we are not warranted in disturbing the judgment.

The judgment will be affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

SOUTHWEST METALS, 

INC., et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CITY OF DETROIT, et al. , 

 Defendants. 

 

Case No. 2:15-cv-11080 

District Judge Marianne O. Battani 

Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti 

___________________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY (DE 35) 

 Defendants filed the instant motion on July 28, 2016, asking the Court to 

compel Plaintiffs to provide complete responses to their first set of interrogatories 

and requests for production of documents. (DE 35.) Plaintiffs filed a response on 

August 11, 2016, asserting that the discovery at issue had been or would be 

provided. (DE 40.) Plaintiffs also pointed out that Defendants failed to seek 

concurrence prior to filing the motion, in violation of Eastern District of Michigan 

Local Rule 7.1. On August 26, 2016, Defendants filed an amended statement of 

unresolved issues indicating that Plaintiffs had provided documents that were 

likely responsive to the discovery requests. (DE 50.) 

Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 54, PageID.978 Filed 08/26/16 Page 1 of 3
2 

 This matter came before me for a hearing on August 26, 2016, at which 

counsel for Plaintiffs, Nabih H. Ayad, and counsel for Defendants, Eric B. Gaabo, 

appeared. During the hearing, Mr. Gaabo represented that there remained only one 

outstanding discovery request to which Defendants were awaiting response. 

Specifically, interrogatory 2b sought the “name, title, address, and telephone 

number, all members, officers, shareholders and employees” of Southwest Metals 

from 2010 to the present. Mr. Gaabo indicated that Defendants were still awaiting 

a response as to the employees. Mr. Ayad informed the Court that the information 

could be provided to Plaintiffs as early as the following week. 

 Accordingly, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED IN PART to the extent 

that Plaintiffs are required to provide a response to interrogatory 2b as it relates to 

the employees of Southwest Metals from 2010 to the present, and DENIED IN 

PART AS MOOT as to the remainder of the motion. (DE 35.) Plaintiffs shall 

provide this information to Defendants ON OR BEFORE AUGUST 2, 2016. 

Additionally, the parties are reminded of their duty pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 7.1 

to seek concurrence prior to filing a motion and to certify in the motion that such 

concurrence was sought. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 54, PageID.979 Filed 08/26/16 Page 2 of 3
3 

Dated: August 26, 2016 s/Anthony P. Patti 

 Anthony P. Patti 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 54, PageID.980 Filed 08/26/16 Page 3 of 3
§ 27.305 What are the requirements for fire-extinguishing equipment on towing vessels in ocean or coastal service whose construction was contracted for on or after August 27, 2003? ( a ) You must carry on your towing vessel both— ( 1 ) The minimum number of hand-portable fire extinguishers required by subpart 25.30 of this part; and
( 2 ) An approved 160-B or 100 lb. CO2 extinguisher, regardless of rating, to protect the engine room.
( b ) You must have a fixed fire-extinguishing system installed to protect the engine room of the vessel.
( c ) This section does not apply to any towing vessel pushing a barge ahead, or hauling a barge alongside, when the barge's coastwise or Great Lakes route is restricted (as indicated on its certificate of inspection), so that the barge may operate “in fair weather only, within 12 miles of shore,” or with words to that effect.
[USCG-2000-6931, 69 FR 34069, June 18, 2004, as amended by USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48246, July 22, 2016]