alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

                           JACKSONVILLE BANCORP, INC.
                      AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO STOCK OPTION PLAN


WHEREAS, this Corporation's Board of Directors approved a proposal to amend the
Corporation's Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") on March 6, 2002; and

WHEREAS, on April 24, 2002, at the Corporation's Annual Meeting, the amendment
to the Plan was approved by the Corporation's shareholders; and

WHEREAS, the amendment increases the number of shares of the Corporation's
common stock (the "Common Stock") reserved for issuance under the Plan by 15% of
the total number of shares subscribed for in the rights offering ending April
30, 2002; and

WHEREAS, the Corporation sold 225,000 units which resulted in the issuance of
450,000 shares of Common Stock in the rights offering thereby increasing the
number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Plan by 67,500.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Amendment is hereby adopted to evidence the amendment of the
Plan recommended by the Board of Directors and approved by the shareholders.

1.   Section 1.5 is hereby amended to read as follows:

     LIMITATION ON AWARDS. The aggregate number of shares of Common Stock
     reserved for issuance pursuant to the exercise of options, which may be
     granted or issued under the terms of the Plan may not exceed 220,099
     shares. The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be the
     subject of awards to an eligible participant may not exceed 40,000 shares
     (subject to adjustment under Section 5.2) during any fiscal year. Whenever
     any outstanding grant or portion thereof expires, is cancelled or forfeited
     or is otherwise terminated for any reason without having been exercised or
     vested, or without payment having been made in respect of the entire grant,
     the Common Stock allocable to the expired, forfeited, canceled or otherwise
     terminated portion of the grant may again be the subject of further grants
     hereunder.

2.   All other provisions of the plan shall not be affected hereby and shall
     remain in full force and effect.

Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.


/s/ Gilbert J. Pomar, III
-----------------------------------
Gilbert J. Pomar, III, President and
Chief Executive Officer
#### § 205.5 Contracts containing disputes article.

When a contract contains a disputes article, the disputes article will govern the bases for negotiating disputes regarding audit findings, interpretations, or decisions made by MARAD and any appeals.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

ALAN THIBAULT, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-11358 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

EDWARD WIERSZEWSKI, 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER ON MOTION HEARING 

On April 14, 2015, Plaintiff Alan Thibault (“Thibault”) filed this civil-rights 

action against Defendant Edward Wierszewski (“Wierszewski”). Among other 

things, Thibault alleges that Wierszewski wrongfully arrested him after 

Wierszewski mistakenly concluded that Thibault had been driving under the 

influence. (See Compl., ECF #1.) 

Wierszewski has now filed a motion seeking summary judgment (the 

“Summary Judgment Motion”). (See ECF #13.) Wierszewski also seeks to exclude 

the testimony of Thibault’s expert witness Marty Bugbee (“Bugbee”) (the “Motion 

to Exclude”). (See ECF #14.) 

Thibault filed responses to both motions. (See ECF ## 14, 15.) Thibault also 

filed a “notice” with the Court that purports to file Bugbee’s written expert report 

as an exhibit to Thibault’s response to the Summary Judgment Motion (the 

2:15-cv-11358-MFL-MJH Doc # 23 Filed 06/07/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 686
 2 

“Notice”). (See ECF #20.) In response to the Notice, Wierszewski filed a motion 

requesting leave to file a sur-reply addressing Bubee’s report (the “Motion for 

Leave”). (See ECF #21.) 

The Court held a hearing on all of the pending motions on June 6, 2016. For 

the reasons stated on the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Notice, 

including the expert report, is STRICKEN from the record, and the Court will not 

consider Bugbee’s expert report when ruling on the Summary Judgment Motion. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Leave is DENIED AS MOOT. 

In all other respects, the Court takes the Summary Judgment Motion and the 

Motion to Exclude under advisement. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

       s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: June 7, 2016 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on June 7, 2016, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113

2:15-cv-11358-MFL-MJH Doc # 23 Filed 06/07/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 687
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

PETER DURHAM and NOMSA DURHAM,

Plaintiffs, Case Number 15-11900

v. Honorable David M. Lawson

EQUITYEXPERTS.ORG, LLC,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On June 17, 2015, the parties filed with the Court a notice that they had reached a final

settlement of all claims in this matter. The case therefore will be dismissed.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and

without costs to any party. Any party may apply to reopen the matter to enforce the settlement

agreement on or before July 22, 2015.

s/David M. Lawson 

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

Dated: June 22, 2015

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on June 22, 2015.

s/Susan Pinkowski 

SUSAN PINKOWSKI

Case 2:15-cv-11900-DML-MKM ECF No. 6 filed 06/22/15 PageID.24 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 99.15****CONSENT OF EXPERT**     Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Cameco Corporation (the“Company”) to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.     I hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name under the heading “The NuclearBusiness — Reserves and Resources” in the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year endedDecember 31, 2006, dated March 30, 2007 (the “AIF”), under the heading “Qualified Persons” inManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation for the yearended December 31, 2006 (the “MD&A”) and in the 40-F, and to disclosure of a scientific andtechnical nature pursuant to which I have acted in a supervisory capacity under the heading “TheNuclear Business — Reserves and Resources” of the AIF and under the heading “Qualified Persons” inthe MD&A.Sincerely,*/s/ Gary Haywood*
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58855-58856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23252]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[AC 187-1H]

Schedule of Charges Outside the United States

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is announcing the

[[Page 58856]]

availability of Advisory Circular (AC) 187-1H which transmits an 
updated schedule of charges for services of FAA Flight Standards 
Aviation Safety Inspectors outside the United States. The advisory 
circular has been updated in accordance with the procedures listed in 
14 CFR Part 187, Appendix A.

DATES: This AC is effective on October 1, 2014.

ADDRESSES: How to obtain copies: A copy of this publication may be 
downloaded from: http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/
AdvisoryCircular/.pdf

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Tish Thompkins-Imafidon, Flight 
Standards Service, AFS-50, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202) 385-
8097.

    Issued in Washington, DC on September 25, 2014.
John Duncan,
Director, Flight Standards Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-23252 Filed 9-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.1210 Hold space, void space, cofferdam, and spaces containing cargo piping. ( a ) Each hold space, void space, cofferdam, and spaces containing cargo piping must have: ( 1 ) A fixed mechanical ventilation system; or
( 2 ) A fixed ducting system that has a portable blower that meets § 154.1205(i) and (j).
( b ) A portable blower in any personnel access opening must not reduce the area of that opening so that the opening does not meet § 154.340.
# C_2013313EN.01002201.xml

| 26.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — De Nicola v EIB

(Case T-264/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Civil service - EIB staff - Appraisal - Promotion - 2007 appraisal and promotion period - Decision of the Appeals Committee - Psychological harassment - Reasonable period - Claim for setting aside - Claim for damages)

2013/C 313/41

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Isola, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: initially by T. Gilliams and F. Martin, and subsequently by Gilliams and G. Nuvoli, acting as Agents, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) in Case F-59/09 De Nicola v EIB, not yet published in the ECR, seeking the setting aside of that judgment.

De Nicola

EIB

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) in Case F-59/09 De Nicola v EIB, in so far as it rejects Mr Carlo De Nicola’s claims seeking the annulment of the decision of the Appeals Committee of the European Investment Bank (EIB) and compensation for the damage he claims to have suffered as a result of his harassment by the EIB; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) in Case F-59/09 De Nicola v EIB, in so far as it rejects Mr Carlo De Nicola’s claims seeking the annulment of the decision of the Appeals Committee of the European Investment Bank (EIB) and compensation for the damage he claims to have suffered as a result of his harassment by the EIB;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the appeal;

| 3. | Refers the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Refers the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal;

| 4. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 16.7.2011.

1

---
2005 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

5-16-2005

USA v. Miller

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 02-4304

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Miller" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 1192.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/1192
 The Honorable John R. Gibson, Senior Circuit Judge for the United States Court of *

Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

NOT PRECEDENTIAL

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Case No: 02-4304

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Appellant

 v.

EARNEST MILLER,

a/k/a

PAUL JONES

a/k/a

EARNEST RUSSELL

_____________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Crim. No. 01 CR 00186)

District Judge: The Honorable Edwin M. Kosik

 

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

After Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Before: FUENTES, SMITH and GIBSON, Circuit Judges*

(Filed:May 16, 2005)

______________

OPINION OF THE COURT

________________
SMITH, Circuit Judge.

In an opinion filed on April 15, 2004, we agreed with the United States, the

appellant in this criminal appeal, and concluded that there were “no facts in this record to

support the District Court’s downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3 or U.S.S.G. §

5K2.0." Consistent with that determination, we vacated the judgment of the District

Court sentencing Earnest Miller to 41 months imprisonment. 

Miller filed a timely petition for writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court. After 

issuing its decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. __, 125 S.Ct. 738 (2005), the

Supreme Court granted Miller’s petition for writ of certiorari, vacated our judgment, and

remanded for further proceedings in light of Booker. 

Thereafter, the Clerk of this Court directed the parties in a notice dated March 3,

2005, to comment on the applicability of Booker. Neither party responded. Thus, it

appears that neither party seeks resentencing in accordance with Booker. For that reason,

we will affirm the judgment of sentence.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.23


                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


$  300,000.00                                            Date:  October 25, 2004

For value received the undersigned SUPERIOR GALLERIES, INC. (the "Promisor")
promises to pay to the order of STEPHEN GEHRINGER (the "Payee"),

At Beverly Hills, California or such other place as the Payee may designate in
writing, the sum of $ 300,000.00 with interest from October 25, 2004, on the
unpaid principal at the rate of 10.00% percent annually.

The unpaid principal and accrued interest shall be payable on demand. All
payments on this Note shall be applied first in payment of accrued interest and
any remainder in payment of principal.

This Note shall be secured by specific coins "Coin Collateral" from Superior's
rare coin inventory as listed in Exhibit A. The Coin Collateral may be held by
the Payee or another third party designated by the Payee.

If any one or more of the provisions of this Note is determined to be
unenforceable, in whole or in part, or any reason, the remaining provisions
shall remain fully operative.

All payments of principal and interest on this Note shall be paid in the legal
currency of the United States. Promisor waives presentment for payment, protest
and notice of protest and nonpayment of this Note.

No renewal or extension of this Note, delay in enforcing any right of the Payee
under this Note, or assignment by Payee of this Note shall affect the liability
of the Promisor. All rights for the Payee under this Note are cumulative and may
be excised concurrently or consecutively at the Payee's option.

This note shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
California.

Signed this 25th day of October 2004 at Beverly Hills, California.



By: /s/ Silvano A. DiGenova
    -----------------------
    Silvano A. DiGenova,
    Chief Executive Officer
#### § 201.89 Disqualification of presiding officer.

Any presiding officer may at any time withdraw if he deems himself disqualified, in which case another presiding officer will be designated. If a party to a proceeding, or his representative, files in good faith a timely and sufficient affidavit of personal bias or disqualification of a presiding officer, the Administration will determine the matter as a part of the record and decision in the case.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 65 (Thursday, April 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 16801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1680]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, Predoctoral Training at the 
Interface of the Behavioral and Biomedical Sciences.
    Date: April 10, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Meredith D. Temple-O'Connor, PhD, Office of 
Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, 
National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 3AN12C, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-2772, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a4d0c1c9d4c8c1cbc7c9e4c9c5cdc88acacdcc8ac3cbd2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c8bcada5b8a4ada7aba588a5a9a1a4e6a6a1a0e6afa7be">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, and Biological Chemistry 
Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental Biology Research; 
93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, Special Minority 
Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 30, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1680 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
MIE (Rev. 9/09) Order Re: Disqualification of Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Plaintiff(s), Case No. 

v. Honorable

Defendant(s).

/

ORDER RE: DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455, I hereby DISQUALIFY myself from the above-styled case.

IT IS ORDERED that in accordance with E.D. Mich. LR 83.11(d), this case be reassigned by blind draw

to another judge of this court.

Date:

U.S. District Judge

Pursuant to this order, this case is reassigned to Judge .

Case assignment credit will be given to the appropriate Judicial Officers.

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on this date a copy of the foregoing Order was served upon the parties and/or counsel

of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail.

Date:

Deputy Clerk

BARBARA MITCHELL

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY

15-11707

Robert H. Cleland

May 14, 2015

Gershwin A. Drain

May 15, 2015 s/ S Schoenherr

s/Robert H. Cleland

Robert H. Cleland

Case 2:15-cv-11707-GAD-EAS ECF No. 2, PageID.71 Filed 05/15/15 Page 1 of 1
§ 197.555 Personal protective clothing and equipment. ( a ) When the use of respirators in compliance with § 197.550 and the personal protective clothing and equipment in compliance with this section is chosen as the method or one of the methods required by § 197.545 to be used in meeting the performance standard, the clothing and equipment must meet the requirements of this section.
( b ) The employer shall provide employees with the necessary personal protective clothing and equipment without charge and shall ensure that the clothing and equipment are worn or used properly.
( c ) Employees must be provided with coveralls or a large apron, boots, gloves, and, if necessary, tight-fitting eye goggles to limit dermal exposure to, and prevent eye contact with, liquid benzene.
#### § 25.50-1 Criteria.

Each uninspected vessel must meet the garbage discharge, waste management plan, and placard requirements of [33 CFR part 151](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/part-151) applicable to the vessel.

Note:

[33 CFR 151.67](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-151.67) prohibits the discharge of plastic or garbage mixed with plastic into the sea or the navigable waters of the United States. “Plastic” and “garbage” are defined in [33 CFR 151.05](/on/2024-09-23/title-33/section-151.05).

[CGD 88-002A, [56 FR 8880](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/56-FR-8880), Mar. 1, 1991]
EXHIBIT 23.1

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the 
use of our report dated January 19, 1998, with respect to the 1997 and 1996 
financial statements and schedules of Able Telcom Holding Corp. included in the
Annual Report (form 10-K) for the year ended October 31, 1998 which is
incorporated by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3, No. 
333-22105 and Form S-8, No. 333-04377 pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option Plan
of Able Telcom Holding Corp.).

West Palm Beach, Florida                        Ernst & Young LLP
February 24, 1999
EXHIBIT 4.16.4

                                 March 19, 1999

Jeffrey E. Deavers
The Palladin Group, L.P.
195 Maplewood Avenue
Maplewood, NJ 07040


Re:      Able Telcom-Disposition of Series B Preferred Stock and Senior Notes
         and Transfer of the Obligations to Purchase Warrants held by The
         Palladin Group

Dear Jeff:

         I am writing to notify you of the termination of the Financing
Agreement by and between Able Telcom Holding Corp. and Cotton Communications,
Inc. dated February 17, 1999. In connection with the termination, Able has
agreed to:

o        Terminate the Non-Recourse Promissory Note made by Cotton and payable
         to Able;

o        Purchase all of the Series B Preferred Stock owned by Cotton;

o        Purchase the 12% Senior Subordinated Notes from Cotton; and

o        Assume any and all obligations of Cotton arising in connection with the
         purchase of the Warrants of Able held by The Palladin Group, as defined
         in the Purchase Agreement dated June 26, 1998, and pursuant to the
         Warrant Amendment dated February, 1999 ("Warrant Purchase
         Obligations").

<PAGE>

March 22, 1999
Page 2

         In light of the foregoing, we request that the members of The Palladin
Group designated below agree to look solely to Able Telcom for satisfaction of
any and all of Cotton Communications' Warrant Purchase Obligations.

                                        ABLE TELCOM HOLDING CORP.

                                        By:___________________________
                                           Edward Z. Pollock, In-House Counsel

Accepted and Agreed to:

HALIFAX FUND, LP
THE GLENEAGLES FUND COMPANY
PALLADIN OVERSEAS FUND LIMITED
COLONIAL PENN LIFE INSURANCE CORP.

_________________________
By:
Title:

PALLADIN SECURITIES, L.L.C.

_________________________
By:
Title:

PALLADIN PARTNERS L.L.P.

_________________________
By:
Title: