alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  April      13, 2009 | /s/ Meetesh Patel                                                     |
|--------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 | Meetesh      Patel                                                    |
|                                 | President,      Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial  Officer |

----
#### Henrietta H. Wright, *Respondent, v.*Bank of the Metropolis, *Appellant.*

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide event, Opinion by

Haight, J.
#### § 169.568 xxx

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76707, Sept. 18, 2024.
#### Stephen C. Johnson, *Respondent, v.*The New York, Ontario and Western Railway Company, *Appellant*.

Judgment and order reversed, new trial granted and costs to abide event. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
#### William Holmes, *Respondent, v.*Elias H. Dunham, *Appellant.*

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Mem. by

Learned, P. J.
EXHIBIT 32



<PAGE>



      In connection with the Quarterly Report of L.A.M. Pharmaceutical Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Joseph T. Slechta,
the President, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects  the  financial  condition  and results of the
               Company.


                             By: /s/ Joseph T. Slechta
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                 Joseph T. Slechta,  President,  Chief Executive
                                 Officer and Principal Financial Officer



November 13, 2003
2:15-cr-20308-MFL-MKM Doc # 18 Filed 12/07/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 45
#### § 201.143 Exceptions to rulings of presiding officer unnecessary.

Formal exceptions to rulings of the presiding officer are unnecessary. It is sufficient that a party, at the time the ruling of the presiding officer is made or sought, makes known the action which he desires the presiding officer to take or his objection to an action taken, and his grounds therefor.
**Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 February 2012 — Verenigde Douaneagenten v Commission

(Case T-32/11)**

Customs union — Imports of raw cane sugar from the Netherlands Antilles — Post‐clearance recovery of import duties — Request for remission of import duties — Article 220(2)(b) and Article 239 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Infringement of essential procedural requirements

1.                     *Own resources of the European Union — Post-clearance recovery of import or export duties — Conditions for not taking account
of import duties set out in Article 220(2)(b) of the Community Customs Code — Burden of proof (Council Regulation No 2913/92,
Art. 220(2)(b)) (see paras 26, 27, 36)*

2.                     *Actions for annulment — Grounds — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — To be considered of the Court’s own
motion (Art. 263 TFEU) (see paras 48, 49)*

3.                     *Own resources of the European Union — Repayment or remission of import duties — Application of the fairness clause instituted
by Article 239 of the Community Customs Code (Council Regulation No 2913/92, Arts 220(2) and 239) (see paras 50‐52)*

4.                     *Own resources of the European Union — Repayment or remission of import duties — Application of the fairness clause instituted
by Article 239 of the Community Customs Code (Council Regulation No 2913/92, Arts 220(2) and 239; Commission Regulation No 2454/93,
Arts 871 and 905) (see paras 53‐55)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 6754 final of 1 October 2010 finding that there should be post-clearance recovery of import duties and that remission of those duties is not justified in a particular case (REC 02/09). |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Annuls Commission Decision C(2010) 6754 final of 1 October 2010 in so far as it determines that the remission of import duties in the sum of EUR 531 985.59, pursuant to Article 239 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, is not justified; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
Case 2:15-cv-11707-GAD-EAS ECF No. 11, PageID.149 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:15-cv-11707-GAD-EAS ECF No. 11, PageID.150 Filed 09/30/15 Page 2 of 2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending December 30, 2006

|Filer                                   | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                                
|--------------------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|CUMBERLAND VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION | CIC           | Notice by Jerry D. Greer to gain control of Cumberland Valley Financial Corporation, London, Kentucky, and indirectly gain control of Cumberland Valley National Bank & Trust                                             | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                              | Not available
|Federal Register:                       | Not available
|FIRST NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION    | CIC           | Notice by Jerry D. Greer and Garth Rex Greer to gain control of, First National Financial Corporation, Manchester, Kentucky, and indirectly gain control of First National Bank, Manchester, Kentucky                     | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                              | Not available
|Federal Register:                       | Not available
|PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION               | * 3A5         | Park National Corporation, Newark, Ohio, to acquire 100 percent of Vision Bancshares, Inc., Panama City, Florida, and thereby indirectly acquire Vision Bank, Gulf Shores, Alabama, and Vision Bank, Panama City, Florida | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:01/26/2007   
|Newspaper:                              | Not available
|Federal Register:                       | 01/26/2007   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### James E. Martinhoff, *Appellant, v.*Ann Martinhoff, *Executrix, etc.,*and another, *Respondents*.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending January 27, 2007

|Filer                | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                          
|-------------------- | ----------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|FAMILY BANCORP, INC. | * 3A1       | Family Bancorp, Inc., San Antonio, Texas, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of The First National Bank of Refugio, Refugio, Texas. | Newspaper:02/17/2007Federal Register:02/16/2007
|Newspaper:           | 02/17/2007 
|Federal Register:    | 02/16/2007 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### § 308.104 Additional war risk insurance.

Owners or charterers may obtain, on an excess basis, additional war risk insurance in such amounts as desired and such insurance shall not inure to the benefit of the Maritime Administrator as underwriter.
Exhibit 32.3



Certification

Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert M. Little, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Robert M. Little, Jr.

Robert M. Little, Jr.

Chief Financial Officer

March 26, 2005
Exhibit 10.17 

On February 27, 2009, the Board of Directors of the Registrant approved discretionary grants of non-qualified stock options, vesting one-third on February 27, 2012, one-third on February 27, 2013, andone-third on February 27, 2014, to each of Messrs. Agnone, Alter, DeSoto, Hepburn, Hoffman, Miller, Morello, Newkam, Rose, Ulsh, Weaver, Wiest and Zimmerman and Mss. Piersol and Sears, all of whom are non-employee members of the Board. Thegrants were in amount of 3,000 per director and were granted with an exercise price of $8.77 per share (the closing price per share of the Registrant’s common stock on grant date). Further, each non-employee member of the Board was granted1,000 shares of restricted stock, vesting one-third on February 27, 2010, one-third on February 27, 2011, and one-third on February 27, 2012.
Exhibit 12.1  I, Martin Cotter, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Portrush Petroleum Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the Annual Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.   Date: June 27, 2008  /s/ Martin Cotter Martin Cotter, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Page 1 , 2/2/2015



### Y6

- Scout A NNUAL AND 

### 5

- H OUR 

### I NSPECTIONS

Inspection and Maintenance Programs, in accordance with, § 21.195(d)(1), are required for the continued experimental airworthiness certification of the UAS to be used for market surveys, sales demonstrations, and customer crew training.

(A) Review current software version release notes and verify backwards compatibility.

(B) Each person performing an annual or 5

- hour inspection shall, before that inspection, remove or open all necessary inspection/access covers, plates and cowling. Maintenance inspector shall thoroughly clean the aircraft and motors.

(C) Each person performing an annual or 5

- hour inspection shall inspect the following components of the fuselage and hull group: 1. Fuselage

— for deterioration, distortion, other evidence of failure, and defective or insecure attachment of fittings. 2. Systems and components

— for improper installation, apparen t defects, and unsatisfactory operation.

(D Each person performing an annual or 5

- hour inspection shall inspect components of the motors as follows: 1. Studs and nuts

— for improper torqueing and obvious defects. 2. Motor mount

— for cracks, looseness of mounting, and looseness of motor to mount. 3. Flexible vibration dampeners

— for poor condition and deterioration. 4. Accessories

— for apparent defects in security of mounting. 5. All systems

— for improper installation, poor general condition, defects, and insecure attachment. 6. Cowling

— for cracks, and defects.

(E) Each person performing an annual or 5

- hour inspection shall inspect the following components of the landing gear group: 1. All units

— for poor condition and insecurity of attachment. 2. Extruded aluminum tubing and members

— f or undue or excessive wear fatigue, and distortion. 3. Struts

— for insecure attachment and obvious or apparent defects.

(F) Each person performing an annual or 5

- hour inspection shall inspect (where applicable) the following components of the propeller group: 1. Propeller assembly

— for cracks, nicks and binding. 2. Bolts for improper torqueing. 3. Control mechanisms

— for improper operation, insecure mounting.

(G) Each person performing an annual or 5

- hour inspection shall inspect the following components of the radio group: 1. Radio and electronic equipment

— for improper installation and insecure mounting. 2. Wiring and conduits

— for improper routing, insecure mounting, and obvious defects. 3. Bonding and shielding

— for improper installation and poor condition. 4. Antenna including t railing antenna

— for poor condition, insecure mounting, andPage 2 , 2/2/2015

improper operation.

(H) Each person performing an annual or 5

- hour inspection shall inspect each installed miscellaneous item that is not otherwise covered by this listing for im proper installation and improper operation.
EXHIBIT 99.1

       CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                                  SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of A.M.S.
Marketing, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, I, Alfred M.
Schiffrin, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
A.M.S. Marketing, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:

        (1)    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
               September 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of
               section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
               and

        (2)    the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
               for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of A.M.S Marketing, Inc.



                                         /s/ Alfred M. Schiffrin
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Alfred M. Schiffrin
                                         President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                         Chief Financial Officer

November 7, 2002
#### MANUFACTURERS TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. MAX WECHSLER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Decided October 16, 1929.

Before Gummere, Chief Justice, and Justices Parker, and Bodine.

Por the defendant-appellant, *Cohen & Klein.*

Por the plaintiff-appellee, *John D. Craven.*

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff brought suit on a note purchased for value and before maturity made by the Mohawk Metal Toy Company, Incorporated, of which the defendant, Max Wechsler, was president, to the order of The Perdinand Strauss Corporation endorsed both by the payee and Wechsler individually. The note was duly protested for non-payment and notice of dishonor was given to all save the endorser, Max Wechsler, who is the defendant in this action.

It appears that prior to maturity of the note Wechsler, a creditor, filed a petition in insolvency in the United States District Court against the Mohawk Metal Toy Company, Incorporated, seeking the appointment ,of a receiver and alleging insolvency. The court below held the act of Wechsler an implied waiver of notice of dishonor under section 109 of the Negotiable Instrument act adopted in this state. The answer was struck and summary judgment entered. Section 26 of the Practice act.

It is to be noted that the endorser Wechsler, when he filed *887the receivership bill in the United States District Court alleging under oath insolvency, put it beyond the power of the corporate maker of which he was president to meet the note at maturity. Further, he knew before maturity that an injunction procured at his instance made it impossible for the maker to pay the note. He knew, therefore, that the note would not and could not be met because of his acts. Such conduct constituted a waiver of notice. *O’Bannon Co.*v. Curran, 129 *App. Div.*91.

Some question is raised as to the lack of proof of plaintiff’s title to the note. On this point the proofs do show that the Ferdinand Strauss Corporaion was a regular customer of the plaintiff and upon the endorsement in its corporate name made by its vice-president the note was discounted and the proceeds placed to its credit. This is enough.

The judgment will be affirmed.