alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 199
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 199 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59789, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 199.214 Immersion suits and thermal protective aids. ( a ) Each passenger vessel must carry at least three immersion suits approved under approval series 160.171 for each lifeboat on the vessel.
( b ) In addition to the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section, each passenger vessel must carry a thermal protective aid approved under approval series 160.174 for each person not provided with an immersion suit.
( c ) The immersion suits and thermal protective aids required under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section are not required if the passenger vessel operates only on routes between 32 degrees north and 32 degrees south latitude.
#### § 389.1 Purpose.

This part prescribes regulations implementing the provisions of section 417 of Public Law 108-293, which grants the Secretary of Transportation, acting through the Maritime Administrator, the authority to review and approve applications for determination of availability of coastwise-qualified vessels. Owners or operators of proposed platform jackets may submit information regarding a specific platform jacket transport, placement and/or launch project, following the procedures set forth in this regulation, in order for the Maritime Administration to determine whether a suitable coastwise-qualified vessel is available for the project. If the agency determines that a project owner has registered as required herein and sought in good faith to meet its transportation needs using U.S. flag vessels in compliance with the Jones Act, and that a suitable coastwise qualified vessel is not available, then a foreign launch barge may be used.
# C_2011331EN.01002602.xml

| 12.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/26

---

Action brought on 15 September 2011 — Bena Properties v Council

(Case T-490/11)

2011/C 331/51

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bena Properties Co. SA (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul (i) Council Decision 2011/273/CFSP of 9 May 2011 concerning restrictive measures against Syria, in so far as those measures concern the applicant, and (ii) the subsequent Implementing Decisions 2011/302/CFSP of 23 May 2011 and 2011/367/CFSP of 23 June 2011 in so far as they include its name in the list of persons and entities referred to in Articles 3 and 4 of Decision 2011/273/CFSP; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul (i) Council Decision 2011/273/CFSP of 9 May 2011 concerning restrictive measures against Syria, in so far as those measures concern the applicant, and (ii) the subsequent Implementing Decisions 2011/302/CFSP of 23 May 2011 and 2011/367/CFSP of 23 June 2011 in so far as they include its name in the list of persons and entities referred to in Articles 3 and 4 of Decision 2011/273/CFSP;

| — | annul Council Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 of 9 May 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria and the subsequent measures implementing it (Implementing Regulation (EU) No 504/2011 of 23 May 2011 and corrigendum to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 504/2011 published on 24 June 2011), in so far as those measures concern the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 of 9 May 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria and the subsequent measures implementing it (Implementing Regulation (EU) No 504/2011 of 23 May 2011 and corrigendum to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 504/2011 published on 24 June 2011), in so far as those measures concern the applicant;

| — | order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law, which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-433/11, Makhlouf v Council. (1)

Makhlouf

Council

1

---

(1)  OJ C 290, 1.10.2011, p. 14.

1

---
§ 28.105 Lifesaving equipment—general requirements. ( a ) In addition to the requirements of this subpart, each commercial fishing industry vessel must comply with the requirements of part 25, subpart 25.25 of this chapter.
( b ) Except as provided in § 28.120(d), each item of lifesaving equipment carried on board a vessel to meet the requirements of this part must be approved by the Commandant. Equipment for personal use which is not required by this part need not be approved by the Commandant.
Exhibit 32.2

                                  Certification
                       Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of  Highlands  Bankshares,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the period  ending  December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
James T. Riffe, Chief Operations Officer of the Company,  certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
         Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/S/ James. T. Riffe
----------------------------
James T. Riffe
Chief Operations Officer
March 26, 2004


This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  Sec.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

[A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Highlands  Bankshares,  Inc.  and will be  retained  by  Highlands
Bankshares,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.]
#### § 184.300 Ground tackle and mooring lines.

A vessel must be fitted with ground tackle and mooring lines necessary for the vessel to be safely anchored or moored. The ground tackle and mooring lines provided must be satisfactory for the size of the vessel, the waters on which the vessel operates, subject to the approval of the cognizant OCMI.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; Nutrition and Prevention, Care and Treatment of HIV/AIDS.                    

*Date:*                         May 30-31, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, (301) 435-6680,                         *skandasa@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 1, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2289 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 197.530 Persons other than employees. ( a ) Before a nonemployee (other than Federal, state, and local government personnel) engages in a benzene operation on a vessel in which the person is likely to be exposed to benzene in excess of the PELs, that person must certify that— ( 1 ) That person has had, within the previous 12 months, at least one medical examination in compliance with § 197.560 or 29 CFR 1910.1028;
( 2 ) The physician who performed or who supervised the latest medical examination in compliance with paragraph (a)(1) of this section did not recommend that that person be excluded from areas where personal exposure may exceed the action level;
( 3 ) All respirators and personal protective clothing and equipment that will be used by that person while on the vessel meet the requirements of § 197.550(b) and § 197.555(c) or of 29 CFR 1910.1028; and
( 4 ) All respirators that will be used by that person while on the vessel have been fitted and fit tested in accordance with § 197.550 (c) and (d) or with 29 CFR 1910.1028. Note:
The employer need not furnish the required respirators and personal protective clothing and equipment to nonemployees.
( b ) The certification required by paragraph (a) of this section must be in writing, list the items in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(4) of this section, reference 46 CFR 197.530, state the date of the certification, and be signed by the person making the certification. A sample certification form is contained in appendix F of this subpart.
( c ) Before the nonemployee making the certification engages in a benzene operation on a vessel, that person or a representative of the entity which employs that person must show a copy of the certification to the person in charge of the vessel and the person in charge must examine the certification to ensure compliance with the requirements of this section.
§ 294.15 Initial award of TSP Operating Agreements. ( a ) *Number of agreements.* The Secretary, in concurrence with SecDef, may award up to ten TSP Operating Agreements for the operation of product tank vessels from among those applications submitted by qualified Applicants. If the Secretary and SecDef are unable to select ten vessels for inclusion in the Fleet from their initial review of applications, they may accept additional applications for review to ensure that the Secretary can award ten TSP Operating Agreements.
( b ) *Vessel selection priority.* In consideration of the applications, the Secretary and SecDef will consider each Applicant's vessel(s)'s qualifications as they relate to subpart B and will give priority to applications based on the criteria in paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this section: ( 1 ) Vessel capabilities, as established by SecDef;
( 2 ) Applicant's record of vessel ownership and operation of tanker vessels; and
( 3 ) Applicant's citizenship, with preference for section 50501 citizens.
( c ) *Consideration of applications requesting an age waiver.* If an Applicant applies for a TSP Operating Agreement under the provisions of § 294.15, the Secretary and SecDef will consider: ( 1 ) Whether the vessel is enrolled in its class society's CAP and has maintained a rating equivalent to ABS CAP 2 or better;
( 2 ) The vessel priority factors in § 294.15(b) for both the proposed non-compliant vessel and the vessel proposed to replace the non-compliant vessel within the initial 30 months of the TSP Operating Agreement; and
( 3 ) The feasibility of the Applicant's plan to obtain and operate the compliant replacement vessel within the initial 30 months of the TSP Operating Agreement.
( d ) *Notification to Applicants.* After the Secretary, in concurrence with SecDef, has selected those vessels to be included in the Fleet, the Secretary will notify all Applicants as to whether their applications were successful or unsuccessful. ( 1 ) For each successful application, the Secretary will extend an offer to the Applicant to enter into one or more TSP Operating Agreements, based on the number of vessels selected from the Applicant's application for inclusion into the Fleet. Successful Applicants will have up to 90 days in which to accept or decline the Secretary's offer.
( 2 ) For each unsuccessful application, the Secretary will inform the Applicant of the reason(s) why the application was unsuccessful.
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Central Federal Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date:      November 12, 2010
    /s/ Therese Ann LiutkusTherese Ann Liutkus, CPAPresident, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
§ 32.40-1 Application—TB/ALL. ( a ) The provisions of this subpart, except § 32.40-60 and § 32.40-65, apply to all tankships of 100 gross tons and over constructed on or after June 15, 1987.
( b ) Tankships of less than 100 gross tons and manned tank barges must meet the requirements of § 32.40-60.
( c ) Tankships of 100 gross tons and over constructed prior to June 15, 1987, must meet the requirements of § 32.40-65.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A of DOVER SADDLERY, INC. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers
certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                |  |  |  |                              
|----------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|/s/ Stephen L. Day                              |  |  |  | /s/ David R. Pearce          
|                                                |  | 
|Stephen L. Day                                  |  |  |  | David R. Pearce              
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)                   |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
|                                                |  | 
|Date: June 5, 2013                              |  |  |  | Date: June 5, 2013
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending April 22, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 32.2 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Octillion Corp. (the Company) on the Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harmel S. Rayat, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (i) the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.  OCTILLION CORP.Date:  April 10, 2007By:/s/ Harmel S. RayatHarmel S. Rayat
Chief Financial Officer  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STEPHEN KEREKES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. HARRY STEIN AND MAX EPSTEIN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Submitted January 25, 1929

Decided October 14, 1929.

Before Gummeke, Chief Justice, and Justices Pakkek and Bodine.

For the plaintiff-appellee, *Mark H. Stein.*

For the defendants-appellants, *I. Faerber Coldenhorn.*

*865Pee Curiam.

We find no ground of appeal in this case which, is adequate to support a reversal, even if it be assumed that there was legal error at the trial. The first, second, third, fifth, sixth and tenth point to no ruling by the trial court. The fourth, seventh and eighth are merely general charges of error without any specification of the ruling. The ninth reads as follows:

“Because the action being for trover and a conversion, the value of the stock sought to be replevied should have been determined as to the date of the conversion and not as of the date of the trial.”

This also is insufficient as failing to point out the precise error attempted to be reviewed. We may add that it does not seem to be founded upon any valid exception.

Our courts have many times pointed out the necessity of assigning some ruling of the trail court in point of law or in the admission or rejection of evidence, and also of quoting *verbatim,*any portion of the charge to which exception was taken and which is alleged for error. A late case on this point is *State*v. Blaine, 104 *N. J. L.*325; *Rothstein’s Inc.*v. *Rothstein,*143 *Atl. Rep.*366; 6 *N. J. Adv. R.*1460.

The judgment will be affirmed.