alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 249.7 Approval. ( a ) Approval of the applicant will be based upon an assessment of the applicant's financial condition and solvency, its rating by an accepted international rating service, suitability of the regulatory regime under which the applicant must operate in its home country, and on the principle of reciprocal non-discrimination. MARAD will not approve access to the U.S. hull insurance market, if U.S. insurers are denied similar access to the hull insurance market in the applicant's home country.
( b ) MARAD will publish in the Federal Register each Notice of Application received from foreign underwriters described in § 249.5(c), affording interested persons an opportunity to bring to MARAD's attention any discriminatory laws or practices relating to the placement of marine hull insurance which might exist in the applicant's country of domicile.
( c ) In granting approval, MARAD will consider all materials available to it, and may impose reasonable terms and conditions upon any such approvals granted.
( d ) Upon approval, applicant will be required to establish and maintain for the benefit of its U.S. policyholders a U.S. trust fund in the amount of at least $1.5 million, such amount to be reviewed periodically (but not more frequently than annually), and adjusted as appropriate. This requirement may be satisfied by means of an appropriate irrevocable letter of credit.
( e ) All policies, at the time of issuance, shall contain the latest American Institute of Marine Underwriters' forms, or equivalent, as approved by MARAD.
( f ) All policies issued by foreign underwriters shall include New York Suable Clause or Service of Suit (USA) Clause.
( g ) ( 1 ) To maintain approval, foreign underwriters, other than those specified in § 249.5(b), shall, in addition to retaining the high rating from an accepted international rating service, file annual financial statements in the same level of detail as required for original approval. Such statements shall be due within 120 days after the close of the underwriter's annual accounting period.
( 2 ) In addition, a new affidavit concerning the lack of discriminatory laws or practices related to hull insurance in the underwriter's home market, as described in § 249.6(c)(3), shall be filed annually at the same time as the financial statements.
( h ) Since there is no annual reapproval required, foreign underwriters which are approved shall agree to submit additional information, as requested by MARAD, if it has reason to believe there has been a change in the underwriter's financial status or business practices which could affect the quality of its security. Failure to provide such information on a timely basis could result in immediate withdrawal of the authorization to write hull insurance on MARAD program vessels.
Exhibit 10.29

                          FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
           MORRISON HEALTH CARE, INC. 1996 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

      THIS FIRST  AMENDMENT  is made this 26th day of June,  1996,  by  Morrison
Health Care,  Inc., a corporation  duly organized and existing under the laws of
the State of Georgia (hereinafter called the "Company").

                           W I T N E S S E T H:

      WHEREAS,  the Company  maintains the Morrison Health Care, Inc. 1996
Stock  Incentive Plan under an indenture  which was adopted as of February
23, 1996 (the "Plan"); and

      WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to reflect increases in the
number of shares authorized for issuance thereunder and to increase the limit on
the  number of shares  that may be the  subject  of awards  granted  to  certain
executives during any single fiscal year of the Company; and

      WHEREAS,  the Board of  Directors  of the Company has duly  approved
and authorized these amendments to the Plan;


      NOW, THEREFORE, the Company does hereby amend the Plan as follows:


1. By deleting,  effective  March 26, 1996, the first sentence of Section 2.2 in
its entirety and by substituting therefor the following:

      "Subject to adjustment in accordance  with Section 5.2,  750,000 shares of
      Stock (the  `Maximum  Plan Shares') are hereby  reserved  exclusively  for
      issuance pursuant to Stock Incentives."

2. By deleting,  effective  June 26, 1996,  the first sentence of Section 2.2 in
its entirety and by substituting therefor the following:

      "Subject to adjustment in accordance  with Section 5.2,  850,000 shares of
      Stock (the  `Maximum  Plan Shares') are hereby  reserved  exclusively  for
      issuance pursuant to Stock Incentives."

3. By deleting,  effective March 26, 1996, the number "100,000" where it appears
in the last  sentence of Section  2.4 and by  substituting  therefor  the number
"300,000".

4. Except as specifically  amended  hereby,  the Plan shall remain in full force
and effect as prior to the adoption of this First Amendment.

5.  Notwithstanding  the  foregoing,  the  adoption of this First  Amendment  is
subject to the approval of the stockholders of the Company and in the event that
the  stockholders  of the Company fail to approve such  adoption  within  twelve
months of March 26, 1996, the adoption of this First Amendment shall be null and
void.

      IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the Company has caused  this First  Amendment  to be
executed on the day and year first above written.


                                    MORRISON HEALTH CARE, INC.

                             By: /s/Glenn Davenport
                             Title: President and Chief Executive Officer


ATTEST:

By: /s/John E. Fountain
Title:  Secretary


      (CORPORATE SEAL)
§ 28.820 Fire pumps, fire mains, fire hydrants, and fire hoses. ( a ) Each vessel must be equipped with a self-priming, power driven fire pump connected to a fixed piping system. This pump must be capable of delivering an effective stream of water from a hose connected to the highest outlet. The minimum capacity of the power fire pump shall be 50 gallons per minute at a pressure of not less than 60 pounds per square inch at the pump outlet. ( 1 ) If multiple pumps are installed, they may be used for other purposes provided at least one pump is kept available for use on the fire system at all times.
( 2 ) In addition, each vessel must be fitted with a portable fire pump having a minimum capacity of that specified in paragraph (a) of this section, capable of producing a stream of water having a throw of at least 12 meters (39.4 feet) from the nozzle, and capable of being connected to National Standard Fire Hose of the size utilized on board the vessel. If a vessel already has on board a portable pump satisfying the bilge system requirements of § 28.255(d), no additional portable pump is required as long as the portable pump is of sufficient size/capacity, and is properly equipped to handle both fire fighting and flood control.
( b ) Each vessel must have a sufficient number of fire hydrants to reach any part of the vessel using a single length of hose.
( c ) Each fire hydrant must have at least one length of fire hose connected to the outlet at all times, a spanner, and a hose rack or other device for stowing the hose at all times. ( 1 ) All parts of the firemain located on exposed decks shall either be protected against freezing or be fitted with cutout valves and drain valves.
( 2 ) Firehose shall not be used for any other purpose other than fire extinguishing, drills, and testing.
( 3 ) Each length of fire hose must be a minimum of 3.83 centimeters (11 ⁄ 2”) diameter lined commercial fire hose and be fitted with a nozzle made of corrosion resistant material capable of providing a solid stream and a spray pattern.
[CGD 94-025, 60 FR 54444, Oct. 24, 1995, as amended by USCG-2010-0759, 75 FR 60002, Sept. 29, 2010]
Exhibit 10.3



RENEWAL OF



EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN



GREGORY A. DUNCAN AND



SUSQUEHANNA BANCSHARES, INC.



As of February 28, 2004, the employment of Gregory A. Duncan is hereby deemed to be renewed for three (3) years under the terms and conditions per the Employment Agreement dated March 12, 2001 (but effective as
of February 28, 2001), as amended.



The base salary as per
Section 4.1 will be $316,020.00 per year.



|                      |  |  |  |                        |  |                                    |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------- |  | 
|                      |  |  |  |                        |  | SUSQUEHANNA BANCSHARES, INC.      
|Attest:               |  |  |  |                        |  |                                   
|                      |  |  | 
|/s/ Lisa M. Cavage    |  |  |  | By:                    |  | /s/ Edward Balderston, Jr.        
|Secretary and Counsel |  |  |  | Edward Balderston, Jr.
|                      |  |  |  |                        |  | EVP & Chief Administrative Officer
|                      |  |  | 
|[SEAL]                |  |  |  |                        |  |
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                         Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350

       In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Astrata Group  Incorporated
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Trevor Venter,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, to the best of
my  knowledge,  pursuant to Exchange Act Rule  15d-14(b)  and 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

       i.     The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       ii.    The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
              operations of the Company.

       A signed original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  required by Section 906, has been  provided to Astrata Group
Incorporated and will be retained by Astrata Group Incorporated and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated:  July 15, 2005

                                           /S/ TREVOR VENTER
                                           -------------------------------
                                           Name:  Trevor Venter
                                           Title:  Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 
 Certification
Pursuant to
 Exchange
Act Rule 15d-14(b) and
 18
U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Astrata Group Incorporated
(the ”Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Thomas A. Wagner, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 i.
              The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act 1934;
and
 
 ii.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Astrata Group Incorporated and will be
retained by Astrata Group Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 Dated:  October
      14, 2008
              
              /s/ THOMAS A.
      WAGNERName:
      Thomas A. WagnerTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer
§ 308.6 Period of interim binders, updating application information and new applications. ( a ) All existing interim binders remain in full force and effect without the necessity of re-application or the payment of additional fees so long as the Secretary of Transportation's authority to provide such insurance has been extended and is continuous.
( b ) Assureds under interim binders are required to notify MARAD's underwriting agent annually, by June 30th, of any change in the information provided in their original binder applications including, but not limited to, change of address, vessel name or vessel characteristics.
( c ) New applications for interim binders on American vessels, with necessary attachments (as specified in § 308.3), as well as checks for the binder fees prescribed made payable to “Maritime Administration, Department of Transportation,” shall be filed with the MARAD's underwriting agent. All interim binders on American vessels shall become effective as of the date of determination of eligibility by MARAD.
( d ) New applications for interim binders on U.S. citizen-owned or controlled foreign-flag vessels, with necessary attachments (as specified in § 308.3), as well as checks for the binder fees prescribed made payable to “Maritime Administration, Department of Transportation,” shall be filed for review in accordance with eligibility requirements specified in § 308.2, and mailed to MARAD's underwriting agent. All interim binders on foreign-flag vessels will become effective on the date the owner's contract of commitment is executed by MARAD.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Michael J. Hluchaniuk’s Report and 

Recommendation. (Dkt. 17.) At the conclusion of his Report and Recommendation, Magistrate 

Judge Hluchaniuk notified the parties that they were required to file any objections within 

fourteen days of service, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2) and Eastern 

District of Michigan Local Rule 72.1(d), and that “[f]ailure to file specific objections constitutes 

a waiver of any further right of appeal.” (Report & Recommendation at 28.) No objections were 

filed. 

In United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949–50 (6th Cir. 1981), the Sixth Circuit 

established a rule of procedural default, holding that “a party shall file objections with the district 

court or else waive right to appeal” and that “a party shall be informed by the magistrate [judge] 

that objections must be filed within ten days or further appeal is waived.” In Thomas v. Arn, 474 

U.S. 140, 144 (1985), the Supreme Court held that this rule violates neither the Federal 

Magistrates Act nor the federal constitution. Thus, the Court finds that the parties’ failure to 

object is a procedural default, waiving review of the magistrate judge’s findings by this Court. 

COREY HARVEY, 

 Plaintiff, 

 

v. 

 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 14-cv-14949 

Honorable Laurie J. Michelson 

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Hluchaniuk 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [13], 

DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [15], AND 

REMANDING FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS 

2:14-cv-14949-LJM-MJH Doc # 18 Filed 12/07/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 444
2 

See Thomas, 474 U.S. at 149 (explaining that Sixth Circuit’s waiver-of-appellate-review rule 

rested on the assumption “that the failure to object may constitute a procedural default waiving 

review even at the district court level”); Garrison v. Equifax Info. Servs., LLC, No. 10-13990, 

2012 WL 1278044, at *8 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 16, 2012) (“The Court is not obligated to review the 

portions of the report to which no objection was made.” (citing Thomas, 474 U.S. at 149–52)). 

The Court therefore finds that the parties have waived further review of the Report and 

accepts the Magistrate Judge’s recommended disposition. It follows that Plaintiff’s Motion for 

Summary Judgment (Dkt. 13) is GRANTED and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment 

(Dkt. 15) is DENIED. The Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED and this matter shall be 

REMANDED for further consideration consistent with the Report and Recommendation, 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 

 SO ORDERED. 

s/Laurie J. Michelson 

LAURIE J. MICHELSON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 Dated: December 7, 2015 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing document was served on the attorneys 

and/or parties of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on December 7, 2015. 

 s/Jane Johnson 

Case Manager to 

 Honorable Laurie J. Michelson 

2:14-cv-14949-LJM-MJH Doc # 18 Filed 12/07/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 445
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending January 21, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Icon GuideHelp

----

### Local Navigation

----

    - EPA Home
    - Privacy and Security Notice
    - Contact Us
# C_2012151EN.01001802.xml

| 26.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/18

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Burgos (Spain) lodged on 5 March 2012 — La Retoucherie de Manuela, S.L. v La Retoucherie de Burgos, S.C.

(Case C-117/12)

2012/C 151/32

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Audiencia Provincial de Burgos

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: La Retoucherie de Manuela, S.L.

Applicant:

Defendant: La Retoucherie de Burgos, S.C.

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Should the words ‘premises and land from which the buyer has operated during the contract period’ used in Article 5(b) of [Commission] Regulation [(EC) No] 2790/1999 (1) be understood as meaning that they are limited to the place or physical space from which goods were sold or services provided while the agreement was in effect or can they apply to the entire territory in which the purchaser operated during the contract period? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Should the words ‘premises and land from which the buyer has operated during the contract period’ used in Article 5(b) of [Commission] Regulation [(EC) No] 2790/1999 (1) be understood as meaning that they are limited to the place or physical space from which goods were sold or services provided while the agreement was in effect or can they apply to the entire territory in which the purchaser operated during the contract period?

1

| 2. | In the event that the Court rules in favour of the first interpretation, in the case of a franchise agreement which allocates a specific territory to the franchisee, can the words ‘premises and land’ refer to the territory in which the franchisee has operated during the contract period? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In the event that the Court rules in favour of the first interpretation, in the case of a franchise agreement which allocates a specific territory to the franchisee, can the words ‘premises and land’ refer to the territory in which the franchisee has operated during the contract period?

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 2790/1999 of 22 December 1999 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices (OJ 1999 L 336, p. 21).

1

---
**FUSION TELECOMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES**

----

**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Fusion Telecommunications International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:                 The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.          

|                     | **FUSION TELECOMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC.**                                                                                         |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Date: May 15, 2009 |  

 

 

By: /s/ MATTHEW D. ROSEN                    Matthew D. Rosen                    Chief Executive Officer |

| Date: May 15, 2009 |  

 

 

BY: /s/ BARBARA HUGHES                    Barbara Hughes                    Chief Financial Officer |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.