alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013147EN.01001802.xml

| 25.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 April 2013 — IPK International v Commission

(Case T-671/11) (1)

1

(Financial assistance for an ecological tourism project - Repayment of the amounts recovered - Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of the earlier decision cancelling the assistance - Compensatory interest - Default interest - Calculation)

2013/C 147/32

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: IPK International — World Tourism Marketing Consultants GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: C. Pitschas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Dintilhac, G. Wilms and G. Zavvos, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for partial annulment of the Commission’s decision of 14 October 2011 (ENTR/R1/HHO/lsa — entre.r.l(2011)1183091) to pay to the applicant a total amount of EUR 720 579,90, including the sum of EUR 158 618,27 by way of compensatory interest

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the Commission’s decision of 14 October 2011 (ENTR/R1/HHO/lsa — entre.r.l(2011)1183091) in so far as it limits the amount of interest to be paid to IPK International — World Tourism Marketing Consultants GmbH to EUR 158 618,27; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the Commission’s decision of 14 October 2011 (ENTR/R1/HHO/lsa — entre.r.l(2011)1183091) in so far as it limits the amount of interest to be paid to IPK International — World Tourism Marketing Consultants GmbH to EUR 158 618,27;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 3.3.2012.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

**We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-03703, 333-27009, 333-28147, 333-53667, 333-85791, 333-36478, 333-40038, 333-43838, 333-67868, 333-85884, 333-109314, 333-115143 and 333-132473) on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-132663, 333-96341, 333-31342,333-127722 333-59106 and 333-49180) on Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement Nos. 333-132663, 333-96341, 333-31342, 333-127722 and 333-59106, and on Amendments No. 2 and No. 3 to Registration Statement No. 333-59106, of ourreport dated March 30, 2007 relating to the 2006 and 2005 consolidated financial statements of i2 Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the 2006change in the method of accounting for stock based payments to conform to FASB Statement No. 123(R),*****Share-Based Payment*****) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of i2.**

**/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP**

**Dallas, Texas**

**March 14, 2008**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNITED
PAN-EUROPE COMMUNICATIONS N.V. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> EUROS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                0,87958
<CASH>                                         199,115
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  246,144
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (36,138)
<INVENTORY>                                    159,540
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               740,475
<PP&E>                                       2,928,936
<DEPRECIATION>                               (499,774)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,740,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,920,166
<BONDS>                                      4,452,355
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       441,247
<OTHER-SE>                                     211,147
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,740,625
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               695,466
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (896,597)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (484,465)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,474,506)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (475)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,475,031)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,475,031)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.38)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 96 (Friday, May 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2483]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 14th meeting of the American Health 
Information Community in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. App.) The American Health Information 
Community will advise the Secretary and recommend specific actions to 
achieve a common interoperability framework for health information 
technology (IT).

DATES: June 12, 2007, from 8:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. (EDT).

ADDRESSES: Hubert H. Humphrey building (200 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 800.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: visit http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will include a presentation by 
the Chronic Care Workgroup on Recommendations; and update on the 
Standards Roadmap and the Healthcare Information Technology Standards 
Panel; a report from the AHIC Standing Committee of the Whole on the 
AHIC Successor; and a report on the AHIC Recommendations Implementation 
Status.
    A Web cast of the Community meeting will be available on the NIH 
Web site at: http://www.videocast.nih.gov/.
    If you have special needs for the meeting, please contact (202) 
690-7151.

    Dated: May 10, 2007.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 07-2483 Filed 5-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          73,498                 113,737
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,969,485               1,630,098
<ALLOWANCES>                                    67,866                  51,915
<INVENTORY>                                  4,972,064               2,102,756
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               430,775                  88,512
<PP&E>                                       1,836,396               1,188,789
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,131,640               1,024,343
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,029,900               4,707,010
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,987,456               2,718,398
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     4,678,419                 212,500
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,029,900               4,707,010
<SALES>                                     18,636,604              13,620,736
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,636,604              13,620,736
<CGS>                                       14,351,214              10,174,434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,351,214              10,174,434
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                  65,651
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              68,657                  80,328
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,600,361               1,328,423
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,671                 152,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,571,683               1,161,746
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                 119,000
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,571,683               1,280,746
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.56                    0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56                    0.65
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0215 CITY OF MISSOULA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. JOHN RAY ADAMS ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 28 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 21 2020

08/21/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0215
# C_2012243EN.01000301.xml

| 11.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/3

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Saarbrücken (Germany), lodged on 10 May 2012 — Lokman Emrek v Vlado Sabranovic

(Case C-218/12)

2012/C 243/04

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Saarbrücken

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Lokman Emrek

Appellant:

Respondent: Vlado Sabranovic

Respondent:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | In cases in which a trader’s internet presence satisfies the ‘directing’ requirement, does Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 (1) require, as a further unwritten condition, that the consumer was induced to enter into the contract by the website operated by the trader and consequently that the internet presence must be a causal factor in regard to the conclusion of the contract? |
| --- | --- |

1.

In cases in which a trader’s internet presence satisfies the ‘directing’ requirement, does Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 (1) require, as a further unwritten condition, that the consumer was induced to enter into the contract by the website operated by the trader and consequently that the internet presence must be a causal factor in regard to the conclusion of the contract?

1

| 2. | In so far as a causal link between the ‘directing’ requirement and the conclusion of the contract is necessary: does Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation No 44/2001 also require that the contract was concluded as a distance contract? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In so far as a causal link between the ‘directing’ requirement and the conclusion of the contract is necessary: does Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation No 44/2001 also require that the contract was concluded as a distance contract?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1).

1

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LEDELL HAMMOND,

Plaintiff, No. 15-12051

v. District Judge Paul D. Borman

Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

CITY OF TROY, ET AL.,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER 

Before the Court is Plaintiff Ledell Hammond’s Motion for Scheduling Order for

Discovery [Doc. #20].

Defendants Troy Police Department and 52-4 District Court have each filed

motions to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiff’s responses to these motions are

due on October 22, 2015. It would be prudent to stay discovery pending resolution of

these dispositive motions. Therefore,

Plaintiff’s motion for scheduling order [Doc. #20] is DENIED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE.

Discovery is STAYED pending final decision on the Defendants’ motions to

dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/R. Steven Whalen 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Dated: October 8, 2015

2:15-cv-12051-PDB-RSW Doc # 47 Filed 10/08/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 306
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on

October 8, 2015, electronically and/or by U.S. mail.

s/C. Ciesla 

Case Manager 

2:15-cv-12051-PDB-RSW Doc # 47 Filed 10/08/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 307
**EXHIBIT 99.14****CONSENT OF EXPERT**     Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Cameco Corporation (the“Company”) to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.     I hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name under the heading “The NuclearBusiness — Reserves and Resources” in the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year endedDecember 31, 2006, dated March 30, 2007 (the “AIF”), under the heading “Qualified Persons” inManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation for the yearended December 31, 2006 (the “MD&A”) and in the 40-F, and to disclosure of a scientific andtechnical nature pursuant to which I have acted in a supervisory capacity under the heading “TheNuclear Business — Reserves and Resources” of the AIF and under the heading “Qualified Persons” inthe MD&A.Sincerely,*/s/ Cameron Chapman*
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN – SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MICHAEL REGAN, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:15-cv-10045-GCS-MJH 

-vs- Judge: George Caram Steeh 

 Magistrate Judge: 

CHERF & GREENUP, P.C., 

 Defendant. 

 / 

CARL SCHWARTZ (P70335) 

LYNGKLIP & ASSOCIATES 

CONSUMER LAW CENTER, PLLC 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

24500 Northwestern Highway, Suite 206

Southfield, MI 48075 

(248) 208-8864 

Carl@MichiganConsumerLaw.com 

WILLIAM C. SCHAEFER (P26495) 

DRIGGERS, SCHULTZ & HERBST, P.C. 

Attorneys for Defendant 

2600 W. Big Beaver Road, Suite 550 

Troy, MI 48084 

(248) 649-6000 / (248) 649-6442 (fax) 

wschaefer@driggersschultz.com 

 / 

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS TO ANY PARTY 

NOW COMES the above named parties, having stipulated to entry of an Order dismissing 

the above-entitled action with prejudice and without costs to any party; and with the court being 

otherwise fully advised in the premises; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed with 

prejudice and without costs as to any party; 

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND ORDERED. 

 s/George Caram Steeh 

 U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: June 22, 2015 

 

Case 2:15-cv-10045-GCS-MJH ECF No. 12 filed 06/22/15 PageID.32 Page 1 of 2
2

Parties hereby stipulate to entry of the above order. 

LYNGKLIP & ASSOCIATES 

CONSUMER LAW CENTER, PLLC 

By: /S/ Carl Schwartz_______________ 

CARL SCHWARTZ (P70335) 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

24500 Northwestern Highway 

Suite 206 

Southfield, MI 48075 

(248) 208-8864 

Carl@MichiganConsumerLaw.com

DRIGGERS, SCHULTZ & HERBST, P.C. 

By: /S/ William C. Schaefer _____________ 

 William C. Schaefer (P26495) 

Attorney for Defendant 

2600 W. Big Beaver Road 

Suite 550 

Troy, MI 48084 

(248) 649-6000/(248) 649-6442 Fax 

wschaefer@driggersschultz.com 

Case 2:15-cv-10045-GCS-MJH ECF No. 12 filed 06/22/15 PageID.33 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 31, 2014

p0127

Order 

Clerk

January 31, 2014

147786

CHARLES ANTHONY HURST,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 147786

COA: 313231

Branch CC: 12-060288-AH

LAKELAND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

WARDEN,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 20, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
1 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

 SOUTHERN DIVISION 

WILLIAM E. POWELL, 

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 2:15-CV-11616 

JUDGE PAUL D. BORMAN 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANTHONY P. PATTI 

 v. 

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, 

Defendant. 

 

ORDER CONSTRUING PLAINTIFF’S SEPTEMBER 28, 2015 MOTION 

(DE 19) AS A MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A CASE MANAGEMENT 

SCHEDULING ORDER and GRANTING SUCH MOTION 

This case is one of three Plaintiff has filed in this Court against the Internal 

Revenue Service.1

 Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit pro se on May 5, 2015. (DE 

1.) He is proceeding in forma pauperis. (See DEs 2, 6 & 7.) 

This case has been referred to me for all pretrial matters. (See DE 13.) 

Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s September 28, 2015 request for the Court 

to require a meet and confer report. (DE 19.) In support of his request, Plaintiff 

cites Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) (“Conference of the Parties; Planning for Discovery.”) 

and E.D. Mich. LR 16.3 (“Alternative Dispute Resolution: General Provisions”). 

 

1 See also Powell v. IRS, Case No. 2:14-cv-12626-SFC-MJH and Powell v. IRS, 

2:15-cv-11033-PDB-APP. 

2:15-cv-11616-PDB-APP Doc # 21 Filed 10/28/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 105
2 

Upon consideration, Plaintiff’s September 28, 2015 motion (DE 19) is 

CONSTRUED as a motion for entry of a case management scheduling order and is 

GRANTED. Accordingly, the parties shall confer and develop a proposed 

discovery plan as contemplated by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). This proposed plan shall 

be filed with the Court no later than Tuesday, November 10, 2015. Once the 

Court receives the parties’ proposed plan, it will enter a case management 

scheduling order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 28, 2015 s/Anthony P. Patti 

 Anthony P. Patti 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record 

on October 28, 2015, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail. 

 s/Michael Williams 

 Case Manager for the 

 Honorable Anthony P. Patti 

2:15-cv-11616-PDB-APP Doc # 21 Filed 10/28/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 106
#### § 296.1 Purpose.

This part prescribes regulations implementing the provisions of Subtitle C, Maritime Security Fleet Program, Title XXXV of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004, the Maritime Security Act of 2003 (MSA 2003), governing Maritime Security Program (MSP) payments for vessels operating in the foreign trade or mixed foreign and domestic commerce of the United States allowed under a registry endorsement issued under 46 U.S.C. 12105. The MSA 2003 provides for joint responsibility between the Department of Defense (DOD) and the Department of Transportation (DOT) for administering the law. These regulations provide the framework for the coordination between DOD and DOT in implementing the MSA 2003. Implementation of the MSA 2003 has been delegated by the Secretary of Transportation to the Maritime Administrator, U.S. Maritime Administration and by the Secretary of Defense to the Commander, U.S. Transportation Command, respectively.
EXHIBIT 99.5
 Contractual Cash Obligations
 Due inLess Than
    
    Due in
    
    Due inAs at December 31, 2008
    
    
    
    
    
    1
    
    1 - 3
    
    4 - 5
    
    Due After(Cdn$ millions)
    
    Total
    
    Year
    
    Years
    
    Years
    
    5 YrsLong-term debt
    
    
    1,042
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    442
    
    
    
    302
    
    
    
    298BPLP capital lease 1
    
    
    181
    
    
    
    10
    
    
    
    25
    
    
    
    31
    
    
    
    115Interest on long-term debt
    
    
    142
    
    
    
    33
    
    
    
    46
    
    
    
    35
    
    
    
    28Interest on BPLP capital lease 1
    
    
    81
    
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    24
    
    
    
    20
    
    
    
    24Provision for reclamation
    
    
    556
    
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    35
    
    
    
    23
    
    
    
    485Other liabilities
    
    
    216
    
    
    
    15
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    199Unconditional product purchase obligations
2, 3
    
    
    1,158
    
    
    
    176
    
    
    
    354
    
    
    
    536
    
    
    
    92Total contractual cash obligations
    
    
    3,376
    
    
    
    260
    
    
    
    927
    
    
    
    948
    
    
    
    1,241
 
 1
    
    Represents Cameco Corporations proportionate share of Bruce Power Limited
Partnerships (BPLP) capital lease obligation.2
    
    Denominated in US dollars, converted to Canadian dollars at the December 31, 2008
rate of Cdn$1.2246.3
    
    Virtually all of Cameco Corporations product purchase obligations are under
long-term, fixed-price arrangements. Commercial Commitments
 As at December 31, 2008(Cdn$ millions)
    
    Total amounts committedStandby letters of credit 1
    
    
    429BPLP guarantees 2
    
    
    82Total commercial commitments
    
    
    511
 
 1
    
    The standby letters of credit maturing in 2009 were issued with a one-year term and
will be automatically renewed on a year-by-year basis until the underlying obligations are
resolved. These obligations are primarily the decommissioning and reclamation of Cameco
Corporations mining and conversion facilities. As such, the letters of credit are expected
to remain outstanding well into the future.2
    
    At December 31, 2008, Cameco Corporations total commitment for financial assurances
given on behalf of BPLP was estimated to be Cdn$82 million. Refer to note 24 in the 2008
consolidated audited financial statements.