Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Notices 27151 

1Commissioner Okun did not participate. 

2Commissioner Williamson dissented with 

respect to the adequacy of the respondent interested 

party group response, finding that the respondent 

interested party group response was inadequate. 

Commission Williamson also found that other 

circumstances warranted conducting full reviews. 

WYOMING 

Albany County 

Mountain View Hotel, 2747 WY 130, 

Centennial, 07000541 

[FR Doc. E7–9171 Filed 5–11–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–51–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–409 and 731–

TA–909 (Review)] 

Low Enriched Uranium From France 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of Commission 

determinations to conduct full five-year 

reviews concerning the antidumping 

and countervailing duty orders on low 

enriched uranium (‘‘LEU’’) from France. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice that it will proceed with full 

reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)) to determine whether 

revocation of the antidumping and 

countervailing duty orders on LEU from 

France would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. A schedule for the reviews will be 

established and announced at a later 

date. For further information concerning 

the conduct of these reviews and rules 

of general application, consult the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207). 

DATES: Effective Date: April 9, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these reviews may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 

9, 2007, the Commission determined 

that it should proceed to full reviews in 

the subject five-year reviews pursuant to 

section 751(c)(5) of the Act.1 The 

Commission found that both the 

domestic and respondent interested 

party group responses to its notice of 

institution (72 F.R. 144, January 3, 2007) 

were adequate.2 A record of the 

Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, 

and any individual Commissioner’s 

statements will be available from the 

Office of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s Web site. 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to section 207.62 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 8, 2007. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–9148 Filed 5–11–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

Manufacturer of Controlled 

Substances; Notice of Application 

Pursuant to § 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of 

the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 

this is notice that on September 5, 2006, 

Noramco Inc., 1440 Olympic Drive, 

Athens, Georgia 30601, made 

application by renewal to the Drug 

Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 

be registered as a bulk manufacturer of 

the basic classes of controlled 

substances listed in schedule I and II: 

Drug Schedule 

Codeine-N-Oxide (9053) .............. I 

Morphine-N-Oxide (9307) ............. I 

Amphetamine (1100) .................... II 

Methylphenidate (1724) ................ II 

Codeine (9050) ............................. II 

Dihydrocodeine (9120) ................. II 

Hydromorphone (9150) ................ II 

Hydrocodone (9193) ..................... II 

Morphine (9300) ........................... II 

Thebaine (9333) ........................... II 

Opium, raw (9600) ....................... II 

Opium poppy (9650) .................... II 

Alfentanil (9737) ........................... II 

Sufentanil (9740) .......................... II 

Carfentanil (9743) ......................... II 

Fentanyl (9801) ............................ II 

The company plans to manufacture 

small quantities of the Schedule I 

controlled substances for internal 

testing; the Schedule II controlled 

substances will be manufactured in bulk 

for distribution to its customers. 

Any other such applicant, and any 

person who is presently registered with 

the DEA to bulk manufacture such a 

substance, may file comments or 

objections to the issuance of the 

proposed registration pursuant to 21 

CFR 1301.33(a). 

Any such written comments or 

objections being sent via regular mail 

should be addressed, in quintuplicate, 

to the Drug Enforcement 

Administration, Office of Diversion 

Control, Federal Register Representative 

(ODL), Washington, DC 20537, or any 

being sent via express mail should be 

sent to Drug Enforcement 

Administration, Office of Diversion 

Control, Federal Register Representative 

(ODL), 2401 Jefferson Davis Highway, 

Alexandria, Virginia 22301; and must be 

filed no later than July 13, 2007. 

Dated: May 7, 2007. 

Joseph T. Rannazzisi, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 

Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–9200 Filed 5–11–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–09–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Parole Commission 

[(Public Law 94–409) (5 U.S.C. 552b)] 

Record of Vote of Meeting Closure 

I, Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Chairman of 

the United States Parole Commission, 

was present at a meeting of said 

Commission, which started at 

approximately 1:30 p.m., on Thursday, 

April 26, 2007, at the U.S. Parole 

Commission, 5550 Friendship 

Boulevard, 4th Floor, Chevy Chase, 

Maryland 20815. The purpose of the 

meeting was to decide four petitions for 

reconsideration pursuant to 28 CFR 

2.27. Five Commissioners were present, 

constituting a quorum when the vote to 

close the meeting was submitted. 

Public announcement further 

describing the subject matter of the 

meeting and certifications of General 

Counsel that this meeting may be closed 

by vote of the Commissioners present 

were submitted to the Commissioners 

prior to the conduct of any other 

business. Upon motion duly made, 

seconded, and carried, the following 

Commissioners voted that the meeting 

be closed: Edward F. Reilly, Jr., 

Cranston J. Mitchell, Deborah A. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
27152 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Notices 

Spagnoli, Isaac Fulwood, Jr., and 

Patricia Cushwa. 

In witness whereof, I make this official 

record of the vote taken to close this 

meeting and authorize this record to be 

made available to the public. 

Dated: April 27, 2007. 

Edward F. Reilly, Jr., 

Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission. 

[FR Doc. 07–2379 Filed 5–9–07; 4:24 pm] 

BILLING CODE 4410–01–M 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[ SGA/DFA–PY 06–14] 

Preparing Ex-Offenders for the 

Workplace Through BeneficiaryChoice Contracting; Solicitation for 

Grant Applications (SGA) 

AGENCY: Employment and Training 

Administration (ETA), Labor. 

ACTION: Notice; amendment. 

SUMMARY: The Employment and 

Training Administration published a 

document in the Federal Register on 

April 16, 2007, announcing the 

availability of funds and solicitation for 

grant applications to address the 

specific workforce challenges of exoffenders and produce positive 

outcomes with a particular focus on 

employment and reduced recidivism. 

The document is hereby amended. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Melissa Abdullah, Grants Management 

Specialist, Telephone (202) 693–3346. 

Amendment 

In the Federal Register of April 16, 

2007, in FR Volume 72, Number 72: 

1. On page 19027, in the middle 

column, Part I, Service Model, the 

following is added: Grants must be for 

a geographically-defined city or local 

community that serves participants 

within that area. 

2. On page 19028, in the left column, 

Part I, Services Coordinator, stated the 

following: Perform all other aspects of 

managing the Federal grant-including 

fiscal controls and responsibility. This section is amended to add: The 

applicant and fiscal agent for this grant 

must be the same organization. 

3. On page 19032, starting in the left 

column, Part II (3) Other Eligibility 

Requirements, Beneficiary Eligibility, 

stated the following: Individuals aged 

18 to 29 who have been convicted of a 

Federal or State crime through the adult 

criminal justice system, are returning 

from a State institution, and are not 

currently enrolled in a traditional 

program may be served by these grants. This sentence is replaced with: 

Individuals aged 18 to 29 who have 

been convicted of a Federal or State 

crime through the adult criminal justice 

system and are returning from a State or 

Federal institution may be served by 

these grants. 4. On page 19032, in the right column, 

Part IV (2) Content and Form of 

Application Submission, stated the 

following: The additional materials may 

not exceed (15) fifteen pages in addition 

to the Technical Proposal. This sentence is replaced with: The 

additional materials may not exceed 

(20) twenty pages in addition to the 

Technical Proposal. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of 

May, 2007. 

Eric Luetkenhaus, 

Grant Officer, Employment & Training 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–9172 Filed 5–11–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Workforce Investment Act of 1998 

(WIA); Notice of Incentive Funding 

Availability for Program Year (PY) 2005 

Performance; Correction 

AGENCY: Employment and Training 

Administration, Department of Labor. 

ACTION: Notice; correction. 

SUMMARY: The Employment and 

Training Administration (ETA) 

published in the Federal Register on 

April 30, 2007, an announcement from 

the Department of Labor, in 

collaboration with the Department of 

Education, regarding which states are 

eligible to apply for Workforce 

Investment Act (WIA) (Pub. L. 105–220, 

29 U.S.C. 2801 et seq.) incentive awards 

under WIA section 503. The April 30, 

2007, announcement did not include 

the complete list of states; the list is 

now revised to include all eligible 

states. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Karen A. Staha or Traci DiMartini, U.S. 

Department of Labor, Employment and 

Training Administration, Office of 

Performance and Technology, 200 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Room S–

5206, Washington, DC 20210. 

Telephone number: 202–693–3031 (this 

is not a toll-free number). Fax: 202–693–

3490. E-mail: staha.karen@dol.gov or 

dimartini.traci@dol.gov. Information 

may also be found at the ETA 

Performance Web site: http:// 

www.doleta.gov/performance. 

Correction 

In the Federal Register published on 

April 30, 2007, in the third column, on 

page 21307, corrected the DATES caption 

to read: 

DATES: The ten eligible states must submit 

their applications for incentive funding to the 

Department of Labor by June 14, 2007. 

On page 21308, in the chart published 

in the second and third columns, the 

eligible states and amount of each award 

is revised to read: 

State Amount of 

award 

1. Arizona ............................... $1,478,972 

2. Delaware ............................ 912,966 

3. Illinois .................................. 3,000,000 

4. Iowa .................................... 1,079,834 

5. Massachusetts .................... 1,500,386 

6. Missouri .............................. 1,627,366 

7. Oregon ................................ 1,522,101 

8. Tennessee .......................... 1,757,992 

9. Virginia ................................ 1,623,378 

10. Washington ....................... 1,850,193 

On page 21310, the PY 2005–06 

Exceeded State Performance Levels 

chart (see Appendix) was revised to 

indicate that Washington State is 

eligible for an incentive under WIA title 

IB, Adult Education and Family Literacy 

Act, and Perkins Act criteria. 

Dated: May 10, 2007. 

Emily Stover DeRocco, 

Assistant Secretary for Employment and 

Training. 

APPENDIX

State 

PY 2005–06 Exceeded State Performance Levels 

WIA (Title I) AEFLA (Adult 

Education) 

Perkins Act 

(Vocational 

Education) 

WIA Title I; 

AEFLA; 

Perkins Act 

Alabama ........................................................................................................... X X ........................ ........................

Alaska .............................................................................................................. ........................ ........................ X ........................


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES