Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 83 / Tuesday, May 1, 2007 / Notices 23805 

Futures Trading Commission, Three 

Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20581. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 

accordance with the Privacy Act of 

1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, and the 

Commission’s implementing 

regulations, 17 CFR part 146, the 

Commission is publishing a description 

of a new system of records. The new 

system contains records related to 

visitors to the Commission. 

The new system of records, as 

required by 5 U.S.C. 552a(r) of the 

Privacy Act, will be submitted to the 

Committee on Government Oversight 

and Reform of the U.S. House of 

Representatives, the Committee on 

Governmental Affairs of the U.S. Senate, 

and the Office of Management and 

Budget, pursuant to Appendix I to OMB 

Circular A–130, ‘‘Federal Agency 

Responsibilities for Maintaining 

Records About Individuals,’’ dated 

February 20, 1996 (61FR6435). 

Accordingly, the Commission is giving 

notice of the establishment of the 

following system of records: 

CFTC–43 

SYSTEM NAME: 

Visitor Information System. 

SYSTEM LOCATION: 

The system is located in the Office of 

the Executive Director, Office of 

Management Operations, Commodity 

Futures Trading Commission, Three 

Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20581. 

CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE

SYSTEM: 

Visitors to the CFTC. 

CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: 

Information from personal identity 

records, such as driver’s license, 

passport, or Federal/Military ID; the 

number of the printed badge issued; 

location, date, and time of entry; 

company affiliation of visitor; name and 

phone number of the employee visited; 

and the purpose of the visit. 

AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM: 

The Federal Property and 

Administrative Services Act of 1949 (63 

Stat. 377), as amended; Homeland 

Security Presidential Directive 12 

(HSPD–12), Policy for a Common 

Identification Standard for Federal 

Employees and Contractors, August 27, 

2004. 

PURPOSE: 

The purpose of this information is to 

verity the identify of visitors in order to 

protect the employees and property of 

the Commission, verify that visitors 

entering the property are authorized to 

do so, and track the time, date, and 

location of the visitor so that, in the 

event of emergency, the agency can 

account for all the people in its space. 

ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE

SYSTEM: 

Information in this system may be 

disclosed in accordance with the 

General Statement of Routine Uses. 

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING, 

RETRIEVING, SAFEGUARDING ACCESS, RETAINING, 

AND DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: 

STORAGE: 

Computer records are stored in a 

stand-alone database. Paper reports from 

the system are kept in a locked file. 

RETRIEVABILITY: 

By date, and by visitor name. 

SAFEGUARDS: 

In addition to general building 

security, access to the visitor database is 

protected by password. The system, as 

a stand-alone database, is not accessible 

through the CFTC network. Reports are 

kept in a locked file with limited key 

access. 

RETENTION AND DISPOSAL: 

Records will be retained for three 

months and then purged. 

SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS: 

Tammy Semega, Deputy Director, 

Office of the Executive Director, Office 

of Management Operations, Commodity 

Futures Trading Commission, Three 

Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20581. 

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE: 

Individuals seeking to determine 

whether this system of records contains 

information about themselves, or 

seeking access to records about 

themselves in the system of records, or 

contesting the content of records about 

themselves contained in this system of 

records should address written inquiry 

to the FOI Privacy and Sunshine Acts 

Compliance Staff, Commodity Futures 

Trading Commission, Three Lafayette 

Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20581. 

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: 

The individual on whom the record is 

maintained. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 25, 

2007. 

Eileen Donovan, 

Acting Secretary of the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 07–2117 Filed 4–30–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6351–01–M 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Army 

Preparation of a Real Property 

Exchange Environmental Impact 

Statement (EIS), West Los Angeles, CA 

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice of intent. 

SUMMARY: The United States Army 

Reserve (USAR) will prepare an EIS to 

analyze the impacts of a real property 

exchange. This Real Property Exchange 

Program is conducted under the 

authority of 10 U.S.C. 18240, as 

amended. This legislation permits DoD 

to convey certain real property assets of 

reserve components to a State, local 

government, local authority, or private 

parties in exchange for land and real 

property improvements, existing and/or 

to be constructed, including utilities, 

equipment, and furnishings for the 

replacement facilities. Approximately 

10 acres with two, two-story USAR 

Center buildings (Holderman and 

Munemori Halls) and a detached 

maintenance building will be exchanged 

for new construction or real property 

improvements at the USAR facilities 

located at (1) Bell; (2) Miramar Marine 

Corps Air Station, located in San Diego; 

and (3) March USAR Center located in 

Riverside. The exchange property being 

offered by the Federal Government for 

development by the private sector is 

located at the Southeast corner of 

Wilshire Boulevard and Federal Avenue 

in the Southwestern portion of Los 

Angeles County and is approximately 13 

miles west of downtown Los Angeles. 

The parcel is bounded on all sided by 

the city of Los Angeles, and is centrally 

located in the western part of Los 

Angeles County. It is immediately 

surrounded by the communities of 

Westwood, Brentwood, Sawtelle, and 

West Los Angeles, which are all part of 

the city of Los Angeles. Additionally, 

Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, and Pacific 

Palisades are all within 5 miles of the 

subject property. The EIS will discuss in 

detail the 10-acre parcel to be 

exchanged and all reasonable 

alternatives including, but not limited 

to, the (1) No Action Alternative and (2) 

Army Exchange with NonGovernmental Development alternatives 

on the exchanged property. New 

construction or real property 

improvements that will occur at the 

three USAR facilities will be covered by 

separate National Environmental Policy 

Act (NEPA) documentation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patricia Ryan at (562) 795–2356 or by email at patricia.e.ryan@usar.army.mil. 


rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
23806 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 83 / Tuesday, May 1, 2007 / Notices 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: An EIS 

will be prepared in accordance with 

NEPA to address any environmental or 

socioeconomic impacts associated with 

the real property exchange. The EIS will 

examine a wide range of resource areas, 

including, but not limited to, land use, 

air quality, traffic, noise, biological 

resources, cultural resources, 

socioeconomics, utilities, hazardous and 

toxic substances, and cumulative 

environmental effects. Air quality and 

traffic effects are believed at this time to 

be the areas with greatest potential for 

impact. 

All reasonable alternatives, including 

a No Action Alternative (as required by 

NEPA), will be developed and analyzed 

in the EIS. The range of alternatives will 

include several redevelopment 

scenarios. During the scoping process, 

other alternatives may be developed for 

consideration. The EIS will analyze 

each alternative’s impact on the natural 

and cultural environments at the West 

Los Angeles facility and the 

surrounding area. Mitigation measures 

will also be considered in the EIS. 

Tribal, federal, state and local 

agencies, and the public are invited to 

participate in the scoping process for 

the preparation of the EIS. The scoping 

process will help identify additional 

possible alternatives, potential 

environmental impacts, and key issues 

of concern to be analyzed in the EIS. 

Scoping meetings will be held in 

convenient locations near the West Los 

Angeles facility. Notification of the 

times and locations for the scoping 

meetings will be published in local 

newspapers. To ensure scoping 

comments are fully considered in the 

draft EIS, comments and suggestions 

should be received within the 30-day 

scoping period. 

Dated: April 17, 2007. 

Addison D. Davis, IV, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army 

(Environment, Safety and Occupational 

Health). 

[FR Doc. 07–2135 Filed 4–30–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3710–07–M 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Army; Corps of 

Engineers 

Intent To Prepare a Draft 

Environmental Impact Statement With 

an Integrated Feasibility Report for the 

Chesapeake Bay Shoreline Erosion 

Study, MD 

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. 

Army Corps of Engineers, DOD. 

ACTION: Notice of intent. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

National Environmental Policy Act 

(NEPA), the Baltimore District, U.S. 

Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), will 

conduct a review of the 1990 

Chesapeake Bay Shoreline Erosion 

Study to investigate shoreline erosion 

and related sediment management 

measures which could be undertaken to 

protect the water and land resources of 

the Chesapeake Bay watershed and 

achieve the water quality conditions 

necessary to protect the Bay’s living 

resources. USACE will prepare a Draft 

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 

and integrated feasibility report 

documenting study findings and plan 

formulation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Questions about the proposed DEIS with 

integrated feasibility report can be 

addressed to Mr. Kevin Luebke, U.S. 

Army Corps of Engineers, ATTN: 

CENAB–PL–P, 10 South Howard Street, 

P.O. Box 1715, Baltimore, MD 21203– 

1715, telephone 410–962–6141; e-mail 

address: Kevin.Luebke@usace.army.mil; 

or Mr. Christopher Spaur, same address, 

telephone 410–962–6134; e-mail 

address: 

Christopher.C.Spaur@usace.army.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: USACE is 

conducting this review in partnership 

with the Maryland Department of 

Natural Resources (DNR). The 1990 

study evaluated erosive conditions 

along the Chesapeake Bay shoreline 

where publicly owned property and/or 

infrastructure were threatened. The 

1990 study also investigated sources of 

sediment from shoreline that contribute 

to shoaling of public navigation 

channels. 

Several efforts have been completed 

to date in the review. Conditions of the 

Maryland shoreline have been 

inventoried by the Virginia Institute of 

Marine Science and summary data and 

maps are now available on the 

worldwide Web at http:// 

ccrm.vims.edu/gisdatabases.html. Wave 

energy has been modeled regionally for 

the study area shoreline by USACE. The 

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service prepared 

a planning aid report identifying 

shoreline-dependent animal and plant 

species and important habitats. Efforts 

currently underway include: (1) 

Conducting a statistical analysis of 

historic shoreline change rates, modeled 

shoreline wave energy, and current 

shoreline to correlate relationships 

between these variables; (2) Forecasting 

shoreline areas likely to be vulnerable to 

future erosion; (3) Characterizing tidal 

tributary shoreline segments vulnerable 

to boat wake erosion; and (4) 

Formulating shoreline ecosystem 

restoration and public property and 

infrastructure storm/flood damage 

reduction projects for implementation 

by USACE, DNR, and other agencies or 

organizations. Engineering feasibility, 

economic costs and benefits, and 

environmental impacts will be 

considered in formulating projects. 

Additionally, the study partners, in 

conjunction with Md. Dept. of the 

Environment (MDE), initiated 

preparation of an updated shoreline 

erosion control handbook for waterfront 

property owners. 

Study products will comprise 

components of a shoreline management 

master plan DNR and MDE are 

developing for the state of Maryland. 

The master plan would address issuance 

of stabilization permits for shoreline 

property owners, shoreline habitat 

restoration and conservation, and 

coastal flood and erosion hazard 

reduction. The USACE EIS and 

integrated feasibility report will provide 

an overview of the master plan and 

include environmental compliance 

documentation for specific projects 

USACE may pursue. Projects to be 

pursued independently by others would 

require separate environmental 

compliance efforts to be undertaken by 

other agencies and organization. 

The study will be conducted in 

compliance with Sections 401 and 404 

of the Clean Water Act, Section 7 of the 

Endangered Species Act, the Clean Air 

Act, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Coordination Act, Section 106 of the 

National Historic Preservation Act, 

Prime and Unique Farmlands, the 

Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 

Conservation and Management Act, and 

the National Pollutant Discharge 

Elimination System Act. All appropriate 

documentation (i.e., coordination letters 

and public and agency comments) will 

be obtained and included as part of the 

EIS. As part of the EIS process, 

recommendations of projects will be 

based on an evaluation of the probable 

impact of the proposed activity on the 

public interest. The decision will reflect 

the national concern for the protection 

and utilization of important resources. 

The benefit, which may reasonably be 

expected to accrue from the proposal, 

will be balanced against its reasonably 

foreseeable detriments. 

It is expected that public release of 

the DEIS and integrated feasibility 

report will occur in Summer 2009. 

Brenda S. Bowen, 

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 07–2114 Filed 4–30–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3710–41–M 


rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS