alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information derived from financial
statements included in OnePoint Communications Corp.'s quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             157
<SECURITIES>                                     4,619
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,711
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,126
<PP&E>                                          18,040
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,444
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,875
<BONDS>                                         88,725
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           35,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,370
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,890
<SALES>                                          9,123
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,123
<CGS>                                            9,227
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,227
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,813)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,813)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 20,506
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,307)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (9,307)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (9,307)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
I, Joseph T. Slechta, the President, Chief Executive Officer, PrincipalFinancial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of L.A.M. Pharmaceutical, Corp.,certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of L.A.M.Pharmaceutical, Corp.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) intentionally omitted;
c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of the internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   October 13, 2004 */s/ Joseph T. Slechta*  Joseph T. Slechta, President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
13
#### § 177.340 Alternate design considerations.

When the structure of vessel is of novel design, unusual form, or special materials, which cannot be reviewed or approved in accordance with § 177.300, § 177.310 or § 177.315, the structure may be approved by the Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center, when it can be shown by systematic analysis based on engineering principles that the structure provides adequate safety and strength. The owner shall submit detailed plans, material component specifications, and design criteria, including the expected operating environment, resulting loads on the vessel, and design limitations for such vessel, to the Marine Safety Center.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

 Certifications by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant
               to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") by Humboldt Bancorp (the "Company"), the
undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Dated: March 29, 2004                      /s/  Robert M. Daugherty
       -------------                       ------------------------
                                           Robert M. Daugherty
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") by Humboldt Bancorp (the "Company"), the
undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Dated: March 29, 2004                       /s/ Patrick J. Rusnak
       -------------                        ---------------------
                                            Patrick J. Rusnak
                                            Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of the Petition of Mary Baker and Others for the Appointment of a Trustee, etc.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs' and disbursements. Opinion by

Hardin, J.
#### THOMPSON PINCKNEY, Respondent, *v.*ANDREW R. SMITH, Appellant.

*Surrogate*— *sale of real estate of a deceased person*— service *of the citation upon an infant*— a *special guardian cannot h& appointed until the infant has been*served— *the oi'der of sale is void if the infant has not leen served.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of tlie plaintiff, entered upon the trial of this action by the court without a jury.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover of the defendant, who is the administrator of the estate of Hiram R. Wood, deceased, the sum of $881.50 paid by the plaintiff to the said defendant as a part of the purchase-price of a house and lot in the city of Brooklyn sold by the defendant as such administrator, under an order •of the surrogate of the county of Otsego, to pay debts, on the ground that the proceedings before the surrogate were defective, and that he did not acquire jurisdiction of the person of the infant heir.

The court at General Term said: “ The surrogate did not obtain jurisdiction of the person of the infant heir of Hiram R. Wood, whose lands were ordered sold,. The petition of the administrator was presented to the surrogate on the 2d day of March, 1880. The petition stated that Hiram R. Wood was the sole heir and was under fourteen years of age. The surrogate, upon this petition, made an order that all persons show cause against the petitioner on the 26th of April, 1880. This order vras duly published, but was not served on the infant. On the return day of this order the surrogate appointed Andrew R. Smith special guardian for the infant, and he admitted service of the citation ‘for said infant.’ The proof was then taken and the proceedings adjourned to the 10th of May, 1880. On the 26th of April, 1880, a copy of this order, *525returnable tbe 26th of April, 1880, was taken and the return day was erased, and the new adjourned day inserted and was then served upon the *infant;*no new order to show cause was entered or made. On the 10th of May, upon this proof of service and without any further proof of the facts showing a sale to be necessary, an order of sale was made. The infant, when the proof was taken against his inheritance, had not been served with process and had no legal guardian. The order served upon him was not in fact an order and it was too late to be of service. The object of the statute requirement of service upon the infant was such as to enable him to have some one appointed to defend Mm before any evidence should be taken. The giving him notice afterwards would not have that result. The order of sale did not give power to the administrator to divest the title of the infant and the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.”

*■James A.*Lynes, for the appellant.

*David*Barnett, for the respondent.

Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Gilbert, J., concurred; Dykman, J., not sitting.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-2968

___________________________ In re: BankAmerica Corporation

------------------------------ Michael B. Minton Movant Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________ Submitted: March 27, 2020 Filed: April 1, 2020 [Unpublished]

____________ Before SHEPHERD, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Michael Minton, the trustee of the Jack W. Minton Living Trust, appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his 2018 motion seeking payment from a 2002 class action settlement fund. Having carefully reviewed the record and the arguments on appeal,

1 The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion and

declining to reopen litigation in the case. See Penn v. Iowa State Bd. of Regents, 999 F.2d 305, 307 (8th Cir. 1993) (district courts have duty and power to manage their dockets and this court will not intervene absent abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
Exhibit 99.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Barry L. Lazarus, the Chief Financial Officer of Inland Retail Real Estate Trust Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/S/______________________________

Name: Barry L. Lazarus

Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 14, 2002
EXHIBIT 99.8

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of Cameco Corporation

We consent to
the use of our reports, included in this annual report on Form 40-F, each dated February 7, 2014, with respect to:



| |  | our Auditors Report on the consolidated statements of financial position of Cameco Corporation (the Corporation) as at December 31, 2013, December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2012, the
consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012;
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) on the consolidated statements of financial position of the
Corporation as at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for the years then ended; and
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Corporations internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of such reports in the registration statements (Nos. 333-11736, 333-6180 and 333-139165) on Form S-8 for the
Cameco Corporation Stock Option Plan, registration statement (No. 333-139324) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Employee Share Ownership Plan and registration statement (No. 333-181577) on Form F-10.

As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, Cameco Corporation has changed its method of accounting for interests in joint arrangements
and employee benefits for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 due to the adoption of IFRS 11  Joint Arrangements and IAS 19R  Employee Benefits and as a result, includes the presentation of the statement of
financial position as at January 1, 2012.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Accountants

Saskatoon, Canada

February 27, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27622]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2393]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Adoption of the U.S. Air Force Final Environmental 
Impact Statement and Approval of the Federal Aviation Administration 
Record of Decision for the New Mexico Training Range Initiative (NMTRI)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Adoption of the U.S. Air Force (USAF) Final 
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and Approval of the FAA Record of 
Decision (ROD).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is announcing its Adoption of the United States Air 
Force (USAF) Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the New 
Mexico Training Range Initiative and approval of the FAA Record of 
Decision (ROD). The New Mexico Training Range Initiative (NMTRI) is the 
USAF initiative to create airspace that allows mainly F-16 and aircrews 
to receive much needed realistic combat training while maximizing their 
training time. NMTRI includes the Pecos MOA complex.

DATES: Effective Date: May 7, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Federal Aviation Administration, Central Services Area, 
System Support Group, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Nan Terry, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Central Services Area, System Support Group, 2601 
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137, (817) 222-5594.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The USAF, lead agency for NMTRI, published 
availability of the Final EIS on October 20, 2006 in the Federal 
Register (Volume 71, Number 203, Pages 61967-61968), in accordance with 
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) as amended. The 
determinations on the project are outlined in the FAA's ROD, which was 
approved on May 4, 2007.
    For copies of the USAF Final Environmental Impact Statement, 
contact: Ms. Sheryl Parker at (757) 764-9334. A copy of the FAA 
Adoption and Record of Decision can be obtained by contacting Ms. Nan 
Terry in the For Further Information section above.

    Issued in Washington, DC, or May 7, 2007.
Edith V. Parish,
Acting Manager, Environmental Programs Group, System Operations 
Airspace & Aeronautical Information Management, Air Traffic 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 07-2393 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
2:15-mj-30198-DUTY Doc # 1 Filed 04/22/15 Pg 1 of 4 Pg ID 1
2:15-mj-30198-DUTY Doc # 1 Filed 04/22/15 Pg 2 of 4 Pg ID 2
2:15-mj-30198-DUTY Doc # 1 Filed 04/22/15 Pg 3 of 4 Pg ID 3
2:15-mj-30198-DUTY Doc # 1 Filed 04/22/15 Pg 4 of 4 Pg ID 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cr-20315 

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

GALE BRIAN GILSON, 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING 

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA 

AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT 

On November 5, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris conducted a 

plea hearing pursuant to Defendant’s consent. The Magistrate Judge issued her report on 

November 6, 2015, recommending that this Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty. 

Although the Magistrate Judge’s report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may 

object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, 

neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the 

Magistrate Judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and 

recommendation waives any further right to appeal. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, 

ECF No. 21, is ADOPTED. 

 It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s plea of guilty is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 

Plea Agreement, ECF No. 20, is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT. 

1:15-cr-20315-TLL-PTM Doc # 23 Filed 11/20/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 92
Dated: November 20, 2015 s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on November 20, 2015. 

 s/Michael A. Sian 

 MICHAEL A. SIAN, Case Manager 

1:15-cr-20315-TLL-PTM Doc # 23 Filed 11/20/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 93
§ 31.10-21a Periodic gauging of tank vessel midbodies more than 30 years old that carry certain oil cargoes—TB/ALL. ( a ) As used in this section, the term “midbody” means the 40-percent midship length (0.40L) of the tank vessel. The age of the midbody is determined from its year of original construction.
( b ) Midbodies of all tank vessels certificated to carry a pollution category I oil cargo listed in 46 CFR table 30.25-1 must undergo an initial gauging survey and periodic regauging surveys as follows: ( 1 ) An initial midbody gauging survey must be accomplished no later than the next drydocking inspection after the midbody becomes 30 years old.
( 2 ) Regaugings: ( i ) Midbodies of double hull tank vessels, or single hull tank vessels with independent tanks, that operated in fresh water at least 6 months in every 12-month period since the last drydock examination must be regauged at intervals not exceeding 10 years;
( ii ) Midbodies of all other tank vessels must be regauged at intervals not exceeding 5 years.
( c ) The midbody gauging survey must be comprised of at least three transverse (girth) belts of deck, bottom, side, inner hull, trunk, and longitudinal bulkhead plating and attached longitudinal members. The number and specific locations of the gauging points shall be to the satisfaction of the Officer in Charge of Marine Inspection (OCMI).
( d ) Except as provided in paragraph (f) of this section, within 60 days of the vessel's required compliance date the owner or operator shall submit the following to the OCMI that issued the vessel's current Certificate of Inspection: ( 1 ) The gauging survey results.
( 2 ) An engineering analysis signed by a registered Professional Engineer licensed by any state of the United States or the District of Columbia, or signed by a Coast Guard-approved organization, that— ( i ) Certifies the vessel's compliance with the minimum section modulus and plating thickness requirements of subpart 32.59 of this chapter; or
( ii ) Proposes structural repairs and/or modifications that will bring the vessel up to the required strength standards.
( e ) The vessel owner or operator shall keep a permanent copy of the Coast Guard-approved gauging report available for inspection by the OCMI.
( f ) Instead of the submittals required by paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, current classification with the American Bureau of Shipping or another recognized classification society, or a load line certificate issued in accordance with the International Convention on Load Lines or the International Voyage Load Line Act, may be submitted as evidence of compliance with the requirements of this section.
[CGD 91-209, 58 FR 52602, Oct. 8, 1993]