26644 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 90 / Thursday, May 10, 2007 / Notices 

on private lands and Bureau of Land 

Management lands leased to the City of 

Santa Fe. The Forest Service and Bureau 

of Land Management are joint lead 

agencies for this project; the Department 

of Interior Bureau of Reclamation 

(contributing funds), City of Santa Fe, 

and Santa Fe County are cooperating 

agencies. The City of Santa Fe, Santa Fe 

County, and Las Companas Limited 

Partnership are the ‘‘Project 

Applicants.’’ The proposed Buckman 

Water Diversion Project is designed to 

address the immediate need for a 

sustainable means of accessing water 

supplies for the Project Applicants. 

Most of the water would be derived 

from the San Juan-Chama Project, a U.S. 

Bureau of Reclamation inter-basin 

transfer project. The remainder would 

be ‘‘native’’ water rights owned by the 

Project Applicants, and diverted from 

the Rio Grande. The Project Applicants 

propose to construct and operate a 

surface water diversion facility at the 

Rio Grande near the western terminus of 

Buckman Road located within the Santa 

Fe National Forest, near the existing 

Buckman Well Field. The water would 

be pumped to the Santa Fe vicinity, 

where it would serve municipal and 

community water supply customers. 

The Buckman Water Diversion is 

proposed to be constructed with the 

capacity necessary to meet the near-term 

need for water, based on physical, 

technical, and environmental 

limitations. The proposed project has an 

independent use from the long-term 

water management strategy being 

undertaken by the City and the County. 

On July 22, 2002, the BLM and Forest 

Service published a Notice of Intent to 

prepare an EIS for the Buckman Water 

Diversion Project in the Federal 

Register. Scoping meetings were held in 

August and September 2002. Issues and 

concerns identified during scoping and 

throughout the NEPA process were 

addressed in the Draft EIS. On 

December 17, 2004, the BLM and Forest 

Service published the Notice of 

Availability of the Draft EIS for this 

project in the Federal Register. The 60- 

day comment period ended on February 

14, 2005. Thirteen (13) comments were 

received from individuals, 

organizations, and agencies. Specific 

comment responses are provided in the 

FEIS, and issues and concerns raised 

during the review and prior to 

completion of the FEIS are addressed in 

the FEIS. 

The Buckman Water Diversion Project 

FEIS provides detailed analyses of the 

No Action Alternative, the Proposed 

Action, and several alternatives. The No 

Action Alternative would result in the 

agencies not authorizing permits for the 

construction and operation of a water 

diversion and associated infrastructure. 

The Proposed Action includes a 

diversion structure at the Rio Grande; 

water transmission facilities, including 

pumps and booster station buildings, 

water tanks, settling ponds and pipes; 

water treatment facilities; electric power 

improvements; and road improvements 

necessary to build and operate the 

facilities. While analyzing the Proposed 

Action, it was determined that there 

were alternatives for different 

infrastructure, and the effects of these 

alternatives were analyzed for possible 

inclusion in a composite preferred 

alternative. Therefore, three sediment 

facility alternatives, two raw water 

pipeline alternatives, three treated water 

pipeline alternatives, and two power 

upgrade alternatives were analyzed in 

detail. The FEIS discloses details of 

these infrastructural alternatives and the 

environmental consequences of 

implementing them. 

The BLM’s and Forest Service’s 

Preferred Alternative is to authorize 

rights-of-way and easements to the 

Applicants so that they may construct, 

operate, and maintain the road 

improvements and major facilities and 

their locations as described in the 

Proposed Action, plus one of the 

alternatives for each of the following: 

the sediment facility, the raw water 

pipeline, the treated water pipeline, and 

the power upgrade facility. The 

Preferred Alternative also includes 

mitigation and monitoring requirements 

to protect resources. The Preferred 

Alternative will avoid disturbance to the 

historic Buckman town site, minimize 

visual impacts on viewers from White 

Rock Overlook and along Buckman 

Road, and avoid creating new utility 

corridors. The alternatives, including 

the agencies’ Preferred Alternative, 

conform to existing laws and 

regulations, and provide for resource 

protection. 

In compliance with Section 7(c) of the 

Endangered Species Act, as amended, 

the FEIS includes a biological 

assessment for the purpose of 

identifying endangered or threatened 

species, which may be affected by the 

Preferred Alternative. A Biological 

Opinion is forthcoming and will be 

included in the formulation of the final 

decision. 

Dated: March 12, 2007. 

Sam Des Georges, 

BLM–Taos Field Office Manager. 

Daniel J. Jiron, 

Santa Fe National Forest, Forest Supervisor. 

[FR Doc. 07–2303 Filed 5–9–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–FB–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

[AZ–910–0777–XP–241A] 

State of Arizona Resource Advisory 

Council Meeting 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Arizona Resource Advisory 

Council Meeting notice. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Federal Land Policy and Management 

Act and the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act of 1972, the U.S. 

Department of the Interior, Bureau of 

Land Management, Arizona Resource 

Advisory Council (RAC), will meet on 

June 8, 2007, in Phoenix, Arizona, at the 

Bureau of Land Management (BLM) 

National Training Center located at 9828 

North 31st Avenue in Phoenix from 8 

a.m. and conclude at 4:30 p.m. Morning 

agenda items include: Review of the 

March 8, 2007, Meeting Minutes for 

RAC and RRAC business; BLM State 

Director’s Update on Statewide Issues; 

Presentations on Proposed Tri-State 

Shooting Range and Arizona Water 

Rights; RAC Questions on BLM Field 

Managers Rangeland Resource Team 

Proposals; and, Reports by RAC 

Working Groups. A public comment 

period will be provided at 11:30 a.m. on 

June 8, 2007, for any interested publics 

who wish to address the Council on 

BLM programs and business. 

Under the Federal Recreation 

Enhancement Act, the RAC has been 

designated the Recreation Resource 

Advisory Council (RRAC), and has the 

authority to review all BLM and Forest 

Service (FS) recreation fee proposals in 

Arizona. The afternoon meeting agenda 

on June 8, will include discussion and 

review of the Recreation Enhancement 

Act (REA) Working Group Report, 

updated 4th Quarter Schedule of Fiscal 

Year 2007 BLM and FS recreation fee 

proposals, and two FS fee proposals in 

Arizona: 

(1) Alto Pit OHV Use Area (Prescott 

National Forest): Ten minutes from 

downtown Prescott, and 2 hours from 

Phoenix and Flagstaff, this fee proposal 

would add a campground fee at a rate 

of $10 per night per campsite for single 

sites and $20 per night for a double site. 

Improvements include 10 single family 

sites and one double family site, three 

toilets, picnic tables, fire rings, loading 

and unloading area, 9 miles of internal 

designated trail system, additional 

external connection trails, 20 acres of 

designated cross county area, children’s 

OHV play area, and year-round on site 

host. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 90 / Thursday, May 10, 2007 / Notices 26645 

(2) Haigler Canyon Campground and 

Day Use Area (Tonto National Forest): 

Proposed $6 per vehicle fee for 

overnight camping and day-use at 

Haigler Canyon Recreation Site near 

Young, Arizona. Major improvements 

will increase facilities and services 

available to the public. Fee revenues 

will be used for the continued operation 

and maintenance. A quality, waterbased recreational experience will be 

provided for day-users, campers, hikers, 

and anglers. The site will include 

developed campsites and day-use areas 

plus space for campground hosts. 

Fourteen campsites will be provided 

with a picnic table, fire ring with 

cooking surface, and a tent pad. 

Campsites will offer hardened sites for 

tent trailers and tents. Walk-in 

campsites will be part of developed 

campsites. Day-use facilities will 

provide parking for 10–15 vehicles, 

picnic tables, and barbecue grills. 

Following the FS and BLM proposals, 

the RRAC will open the meeting to 

public comments on the fee proposals. 

After completing their RRAC business, 

the BLM RAC will reconvene to provide 

recommendations to the RAC 

Designated Federal Official on the fee 

proposals and discuss future RAC 

meetings and locations. 

DATES: Effective Date: May 8, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Deborah Stevens, Bureau of Land 

Management, Arizona State Office, One 

North Central Avenue, Suite 800, 

Phoenix, Arizona 85004–4427, 602–

417–9215. 

Michael Taylor, 

Acting State Director. 

[FR Doc. 07–2316 Filed 5–9–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–32–M 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–604] 

In the Matter of Certain Sucralose, 

Sweeteners Containing Sucralose, and 

Related Intermediate Compounds 

Thereof; Notice of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Institution of investigation 

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

April 6, 2007, under section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Tate & Lyle 

Technology Limited of London, United 

Kingdom and Tate & Lyle Sucralose, 

Inc. of Decatur, Illinois. Supplemental 

letters were filed on April 13, April 18, 

April 23, and April 25, 2007. The 

complaint, as supplemented, alleges 

violations of section 337 in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain sucralose, sweeteners containing 

sucralose, and related intermediate 

compounds thereof by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 5,470,969, 5,034,551, 

4,980,463, 5,498,709, and 7,049,435. 

The complaint, as supplemented, 

further alleges that an industry in the 

United States exists as required by 

subsection (a)(2) of section 337. 

The complainants request that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

general exclusion order and permanent 

cease and desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint and 

supplement, except for any confidential 

information contained therein, are 

available for inspection during official 

business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) 

in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 

20436, telephone 202–205–2000. 

Hearing impaired individuals are 

advised that information on this matter 

can be obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server at http:// 

www.usitc.gov. The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://www.usitc.gov/secretary/ 

edis.htm. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Anne M. Goalwin, Esq., Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, telephone (202) 

205–2574. 

Authority: The authority for institution of 

this investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2006). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

May 7, 2007, ordered that—

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain sucralose, 

sweeteners containing sucralose, and 

related intermediates compounds 

thereof by reason of infringement of one 

or more of claims 20–26, 28, and 29 of 

U.S. Patent No. 5,470,969; claims 1–4 

and 11–22 of U.S. Patent No. 5,034,551; 

claims 1–3 and 16–18 of U.S. Patent No. 

4,980,463; claims 8, 9, and 13 of U.S. 

Patent No. 5,498,709; and claim 1 of 

U.S. Patent No. 7,049,435; and whether 

an industry in the United States exists 

as required by subsection (a)(2) of 

section 337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainants are—Tate & Lyle 

Technology Limited, Sugar Quay, Lower 

Thames Street, London EC3R 6DQ, 

United Kingdom. 

Tate & Lyle Sucralose, Inc., 2200 East 

Eldorado Street, Decatur, IL 62525. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint, as supplemented, 

is to be served: 

AIDP, Inc., 17920 East Ajax Circle, City 

of Industry, California 91748. 

Beijing Forbest Chemical Co., Ltd, Room 

2 1801, Building 2, Yard 3, District 1, 

Fangqunyuan, Fangzhuang, Fengtai 

District, Beijing 100078, People’s 

Republic of China. 

Beijing Forbest Trade Co., Ltd., Room 2 

1801, Building 2, Yard 3, District 1, 

Fangqunyuan, Fangzhuang, Fengtai 

District, Beijing 100078, People’s 

Republic of China. 

Forbest International USA, LLC, 131 

Fieldcrest Avenue, Suite B, Edison, 

New Jersey 08873. 

Changzhou Niutang Chemical Plant Co., 

Ltd., No. 51 Yanzhang Road, Niutang 

Town, Changzhong, Jiangsu 213263, 

People’s Republic of China. 

U.S. Niutang Chemical, Inc., 2913 

Saturn Street, Unit G, Brea, California 

92821. 

CJ America, Inc., 3470 Wilshire Blvd, 

Suite 930, Los Angeles, California 

90010. 

Fortune Bridge Co. Inc., 137 Meacham 

Ave, Elmont, New York 11003. 

Garuda International, Inc., 638 

Industrial Drive, Exeter, California 

93221. 

Gremount International Co., Ltd., Rm. 

2107, Plaza A, Freetown Center, No. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES