alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”),
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
      Ben
      T. Morris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                BEN T. MORRISBen T. Morris
                Chief Executive
                  Officer




November
      9, 2007




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. and will be retained by Sanders Morris Harris
      Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              18,123
<SECURITIES>                                        32,683
<RECEIVABLES>                                       11,041
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (1,422)
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    84,742
<PP&E>                                              57,577
<DEPRECIATION>                                      11,394
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     224,225
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               22,524
<BONDS>                                            170,739
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              2
<COMMON>                                                20
<OTHER-SE>                                          28,288
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       224,225
<SALES>                                              9,546
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     9,546
<CGS>                                                6,528
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        6,528
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    13,291
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11,118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (21,391)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         3,814
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (17,577)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     12,743
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (4,834)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.21)



</TABLE>
§ 32.50-15 Cargo piping on tank vessels constructed on or after July 1, 1951—TB/ALL. ( a ) On all tank vessels, the construction or conversion of which is started on or after July 1, 1951, the cargo piping shall be: ( 1 ) A fixed cargo piping system shall be installed on a tank vessel carrying Grade A, B, or C cargo. The piping shall be arranged so as to avoid excessive stresses at the joints. For sizes exceeding 2 inches in diameter, flanged, welded, or other approved types of joints shall be employed. Packing material shall be suitable for the cargo carried. Connections at bulkheads shall be made so that the plating does not form part of a flanged joint. Piping may be carried through bunker spaces and deep tanks provided it is run through a pipe tunnel. The tunnel may be omitted where the pipe is extra heavy, all joints are welded, and bends are installed to provide for expansion and contraction.
( 2 ) Tank vessels carrying only Grades D and E cargo may use a portable piping system in lieu of a fixed piping system meeting the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, provided: ( i ) The hose complies with 33 CFR 154.500 or the portable piping complies with part 56 of this chapter;
( ii ) The connections comply with 33 CFR 156.130;
( iii ) A shutoff valve is at or near the point of entry into the tank;
( iv ) Except for the carriage of animal fats and vegetable oils, the system has a closure which forms a vapor-tight seal on the tank opening through which the cargo is transferred, is bolted or dogged in place, and has the hose and drop line connected to it; and
( v ) Except for the carriage of animal fats and vegetable oils, the system has a metallic drop line which complies with 46 CFR 153.282.
( 3 ) Cargo piping shall not pass through spaces containing machinery where sources of vapor ignition are normally present: *Provided,* That, in special cases the Commandant may permit the piping to pass through such spaces if Grade E liquids only are involved.
( b ) Valve operating rods in cargo tanks shall be solid, except that tank barges having plug cocks inside the cargo tanks may have operating rods of extra heavy pipe with the annular space between the lubricant tube and the pipe wall sealed with a nonsoluble material to prevent penetration of the cargo. Valve operating rods shall be of ample size, well guided and supported, and attached to the valve stems in a manner so as to prevent the operating rods from working loose. Where the operating rods pass through a deck, gastight stuffing boxes shall be fitted. The leads of operating rods shall be as direct as possible. Valves shall be of suitable design for the intended service.
( c ) All cargo loading and discharge hose connections shall be fitted with valves or blind flanges.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16671, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGD 80-009, 48 FR 36458, Aug. 11, 1983]
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

RICKEY BILLS, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case No. 15-cv-11414 

v. Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

PAUL KLEE, et al. 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER (1) CONDITIONALLY APPOINTING COUNSEL AND 

 (2) STAYING CASE FOR PERIOD OF 120 DAYS 

Plaintiff Rickey Bills is a state inmate in the custody of the Michigan 

Department of Corrections (the “MDOC”). In this prisoner civil-rights action, Bills 

alleges that certain employees of the MDOC violated his constitutional rights. More 

specifically, Bills claims that Defendants Renee Diver and Vaughn Stewart 

intentionally interfered with his access to the courts. The case is now ready for trial. 

(See Certificate of Completion, ECF No. 127.) 

Unlike criminal cases, there is no constitutional or statutory right to the 

appointment of counsel in civil cases. See Lavado v. Keohane, 992 F.2d 601, 605-

606 (6th Cir. 1993). However, this district has a procedure in which cases are 

referred to a Pro Bono Committee that requests members of the bar to assist in 

Case 2:15-cv-11414-MFL-DRG ECF No. 138, PageID.1513 Filed 07/06/23 Page 1 of 2
2 

appropriate cases. This Court believes that Bills would benefit from the assistance 

of appointed pro bono counsel for the purposes of assisting him at trial. 

Accordingly, this case is REFERRED to the Pro Bono Committee. Bills is 

conditionally granted appointment of counsel provided that the committee is 

successful in enlisting pro bono counsel. The Court will also STAY this action for 

a period of 120 days while the committee attempts to obtain pro bono counsel. If 

pro bono counsel is not obtained within 120 days, the stay will be lifted, counsel will 

not be appointed, and Bills will need to proceed pro se at trial if he cannot retain 

counsel at his own expense. 

Upon the completion of the Pro Bono Committee’s efforts to find trial counsel 

for Bills, the Court will promptly set a status conference with all parties to set a 

mutually convenient trial date. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: July 6, 2023 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on July 6, 2023, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Ryan 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5126 

Case 2:15-cv-11414-MFL-DRG ECF No. 138, PageID.1514 Filed 07/06/23 Page 2 of 2
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

JAMES HONORABLE, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-10190 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

COMMISSIONER OF 

SOCIAL SECURITY, 

 Defendant. 

_________________________________/ 

ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF #16), 

(2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

(ECF #12), (3) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT (ECF #15), AND (4) REMANDING PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM 

FOR BENEFITS FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS 

On November 19, 2015, Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris issued a Report 

and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Court grant Plaintiff James 

Honorable’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF #12) and deny the Defendant 

Commissioner of Social Security's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF #15). 

(See R&R, ECF #16.) The Magistrate Judge further recommended that Plaintiff’s 

claim for disability insurance benefits be remanded to the Commissioner of Social 

Security for further proceedings consistent with the R&R. (See id.) The R&R 

stated that the parties could object to and seek review of the recommendation 

within fourteen days. (See id. at 19-20, Pg. ID 590-591.) 

2:15-cv-10190-MFL-PTM Doc # 17 Filed 12/28/15 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 592
2 

Neither party has objected to the R&R. Failure to file objections to the 

R&R waives any further right to appeal. See Howard v. Sec'y of Health and 

Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers 

Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to 

the Magistrate Judge’s R&R releases the Court from its duty to independently 

review the matter. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The Court has 

nevertheless reviewed the R&R and agrees with the findings and conclusions of 

the Magistrate Judge. 

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's 

November 19, 2015, Report and Recommendation (ECF #16) is ADOPTED as the 

Opinion of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the 

R&R, that (1) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF #12) is 

GRANTED, (2) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF #15) is 

DENIED, and (3) Plaintiff’s claim for benefits is REMANDED for further 

proceedings consistent with this Order and the Report and Recommendation. 

       s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: December 28, 2015 

2:15-cv-10190-MFL-PTM Doc # 17 Filed 12/28/15 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 593
3 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on December 28, 2015, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113 

2:15-cv-10190-MFL-PTM Doc # 17 Filed 12/28/15 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 594
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

                Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
         of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of
                          Title 18, United States Code)

         Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of GWL&A Financial Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2004 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:     November 12, 2004     /s/   William T. McCallum
                                 -------------------------------------------
                                 William T. McCallum
                                 President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated:     November 12, 2004    /s/   Mitchell T.G. Graye
                               ---------------------------------------------
                                Mitchell T.G. Graye
                                Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
                                Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
Skip to contents

----

 Previous 

Next 
Main Menu 

# Litigation        

During 2006, the Board of Governors was a party in two      lawsuits or appeals filed that year and was a party in five other cases      pending from previous years, for a total of seven cases; in 2005, the      Board had been a party in a total of thirteen cases. As of December 31,      2006, five cases were pending.

*Price v. Bernanke*, No. 06-1569 (D.D.C., filed      September 8, 2006), is an employment discrimination action.

*Texas State Bank v. United States*, No. 05-1168 (U.S.      Supreme Court, filed March 10, 2006), was an appeal of a decision of      the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissing an action      challenging on constitutional grounds the failure to pay interest on      reserve accounts held at Federal Reserve Banks. On June 19, 2006, the      Supreme Court denied *certiorari.* 126 S. Ct. 2889.

*Inner City Press/Community on the Move v. Board of      Governors*, No. 05-6162 (Second Circuit, filed November 21, 2005),      is an appeal of the district court's order (No. 04-CV-8337, 380 F.      Supp. 2d 211 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)) granting in part and denying in part the      Board's motion for summary judgment in a Freedom of Information Act      case. On September 11, 2006, the court of appeals affirmed in part and      reversed in part the ruling of the district court, and remanded the      case. 463 F.3d 239.

*Price v. Bernanke*, No. 05-5361 (D.C. Circuit, filed      September 29, 2005), was an appeal of an order of the district court      (No. 04-CV-0973, 374 F. Supp. 2d 177) dismissing an employment      discrimination action. On December 15, 2006, the court of appeals      affirmed the district court's dismissal. 470 F.3d 384.

*Barnes v. Greenspan*, No. 04-CV-1989 (CKK) (D.D.C.,      filed November 15, 2004), is a case under the Age Discrimination in      Employment Act.

*Jones v. Greenspan*, No. 04-CV-1696 (RMU) (D.D.C.,      filed October 4, 2004), is an employment discrimination action. On      December 13, 2005, the district court granted in part and denied in      part the Board's motion to dismiss and for summary judgment. 402 F.      Supp. 2d 294.

*Artis v. Greenspan*, No. 01-0400 (D.D.C., filed      February 22, 2001), is an employment discrimination action. An      identical action, No. 99-2073 (EGS) (D.D.C., filed August 3, 1999), was      consolidated with this action on August 15, 2001. 

Return to top 

----

HomeReports to the CongressAccessibilityContact usLast update: December 21, 2007
EPA and PMAA Meeting

December 5, 2013

Attendees

EPA – Linda Gerber, Paul Miller, Liz McDermott, Carolyn Hoskinson, Mark Barolo, Venu 

Ghanta, Randy Deitz, Raquel Snyder, Pat Hammond

PMAA – Rob Underwood, Mark Morgan

Bjornson Oil Co. – Matt Bjornson

ND Petroleum Marketers – Mike Rud

Kelley Fuels Inc – Vern Kelley

Senator Hoeven – Shawn Affolter

EPA and PMAA met to discuss a number of issues from the proposed revisions to the UST 

regulations. The discussion was primarily about compatibility.
From: Bahner, Mark A. 

Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 1:31 PM

To: Putney.David@epamail.epa.gov

Cc: Green, David A.

Subject: ICR responses PM analysis

Hi David,

Attached is a PM analysis workbook, based on responses to the PAL ICR. It does not have some plants 

(e.g., Ormet) because there hasn’t been time to get all the data entered. The workbook contains a 

summary table, as well as the detailed data.

From the summary table, it seems clear that there is no way to easily establish a MACT floor for PM, 

based on the responses. The responses have many pieces of data that appear simply wrong:

1) Rio Tinto Alcan claims 100 percent collection efficiency for their bake furnace control, and 95% 

for their potlines; I think this is almost certainly an attempt to say that the collection system for 

the bake furnace delivers 100 percent of the emissions to the control system, and the potline 

hoods transfer 95% of the emissions from the pots to the control systems rather than claims 

regarding the control device removal efficiency.

2) Alcoa, Rockdale has a concentration of 648 mg/dscf, which is far higher than anyone else, and is 

simply not believable (there would be tremendous visible emissions from such a source).

3) Alcoa Massena East has a concentration of 0.0006 mg/dscf, which is much lower than anyone 

else. It is potentially believable, but would definitely need further investigation.

In addition to those issues, there is the problem that none of the plants (except Alcoa-Intalco Ferndale) 

report PM emissions from the roof vents (because those weren’t asked for in the ICR). Alcoa-Intalco 

reports them because they control their emissions from the roof vents with a wet scrubber (which has a 

claimed particulate efficiency of 80 percent.

Finally, presumably we would want to have a MACT value in terms of lb/ton of aluminum. Therefore, the 

concentrations would need to be converted into lb/ton of aluminum in order to be used. Since each plant 

may have many potline primary control devices with varying flow rates, this effort would take some time 

(i.e., it almost certainly couldn’t be completed today).

Best wishes,

Mark 

Mark A. Bahner

RTI, International

P.O. Box 12194, 3040 Cornwallis Road

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194

Phone: (919) 541-6016 

Fax: (919) 541-7155 

Email: bahner@rti.org 

Internet: http://www.rti.org
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Case No. 14-20804

v. HON. JOHN CORBETT O'MEARA

KAI XU,

Defendant.

 /

MOTION TO SUBMIT EXHIBITS TO 

GOVERNMENT’S SENTENCING MEMORANDUM UNDER SEAL

On April 8, 2016, the government filed a sentencing memorandum. (R. 32.)

The United States now respectfully requests that Exhibits A, G, H, and I be 

received by the Court under seal. The government asks that these exhibits be 

received under seal because they contain sensitive information.

Respectfully submitted, 

BARBARA McQUADE 

United States Attorney 

s/Sara D. Woodward 

SARA D. WOODWARD 

Deputy Chief, General Crimes Unit

Assistant United States Attorney 

211 West Fort, Suite 2001 

Detroit, Michigan 48226 

April 8, 2016 (313) 226-9180 

5:14-cr-20804-JCO-DRG Doc # 33 Filed 04/08/16 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 297
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SUNSTAR
HEALTHCARE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT FOR JULY 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,348
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       16
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,150
<PP&E>                                             469
<DEPRECIATION>                                     107
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,650
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,319
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,245
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,650
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,079
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,390)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (0)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,390)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     822
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,567)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.85)
        

</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION      OF CEO AND CFO**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of                the                Company. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                August 14, 2006 | /s/                Matthew D. Rosen                  |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  | Matthew                D. Rosen                      |
|                                  | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                  |                                                 |
|                                  |                                                 |
|                                  |                                                 |
| Dated:                August 14, 2006 | /s/                Barbara Hughes                    |
|                                  | Barbara                Hughes                        |
|                                  | Chief                Financial Officer               |