alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 96 (Friday, May 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28096]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2474]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision

[AC-11: OTS No. H4392]


Abington Savings Bank, Abington Mutual Holding Company, Abington 
Community Bancorp, Inc., and Abington Bancorp, Inc., Jenkintown, PA; 
Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on May 14, 2007, the Managing Director, 
Examinations and Supervision--Operations, Office of Thrift Supervision 
(OTS), or her designee, acting pursuant to delegated authority, 
approved the application of Abington Mutual Holding Company and 
Abington Savings Bank, Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, to convert to the 
stock form of organization. Copies of the application are available for 
inspection by appointment (phone number: 202-906-5922 or e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#35654057595c561b7c5b535a757a61661b61475054461b525a43"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d181a4b3bdb8b2ff98bfb7be919e8582ff85a3b4b0a2ffb6bea7">[email protected]</span></a>) at the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20552, and OTS Northeast Regional Office, 
Harborside Financial Center Plaza Five, Suite 1600, Jersey City, NJ 
07311.

    Dated: May 15, 2007.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Sandra E. Evans,
Legal Information Assistant.
[FR Doc. 07-2474 Filed 5-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 190.05-3 Fire hazards to be minimized. ( a ) The general construction of the vessel shall be such as to minimize fire hazards.
§ 193.15-15 Piping. ( a ) The piping, valves, and fittings shall have a bursting pressure of not less than 6,000 pounds per square inch.
( b ) All piping, in nominal sizes not over 3 ⁄ 4 inch shall be at least Schedule 40 (standard weight) and in nominal sizes over 3 ⁄ 4 inch, shall be at least Schedule 80 (extra heavy).
( c ) All piping valves, and fittings of ferrous materials shall be protected inside and outside against corrosion unless specifically approved otherwise by the Commandant.
( d ) A pressure relief valve or equivalent set to relieve between 2,400 and 2,800 pounds per square inch shall be installed in the distribution manifold or such other location as to protect the piping in the event that all branch line shutoff valves are closed.
( e ) All dead-end lines shall extend at least 2 inches beyond the last orifice and shall be closed with cap or plug.
( f ) All piping, valves, and fittings shall be securely supported, and where necessary, protected against injury.
( g ) Drains and dirt traps shall be fitted where necessary to prevent the accumulation of dirt or moisture. Drains and dirt traps shall be located in accessible locations where possible.
( h ) Piping shall be used for no other purpose except that it may be incorporated with the fire-detecting system.
( i ) Piping passing through living quarters shall not be fitted with drains or other openings within such spaces.
( j ) Installation test requirements are: ( 1 ) Upon completion of the piping installation, and before the cylinders are connected, a pressure test shall be applied as set forth in this paragraph. Only carbon dioxide or other inert gas shall be used for this test.
( 2 ) The piping from the cylinders to the stop valves in the manifold shall be subjected to a pressure of 1,000 pounds per square inch. With no additional gas being introduced to the system, it shall be demonstrated that the leakage of the system is such as not to permit a pressure drop of more than 150 pounds per square inch per minute for a 2-minute period.
( 3 ) The individual branch lines to the various spaces protected shall be subjected to a test similar to that described in the preceding subparagraph with the exception that the pressure used shall be 600 pounds per square inch in lieu of 1,000 pounds per square inch. For the purpose of this test, the distribution piping shall be capped within the space protected at the first joint ahead of the nozzles.
( 4 ) In lieu of the tests prescribed in the preceding paragraphs in this paragraph, small independent systems protecting spaces such as emergency generator rooms, lamp lockers, chemical storerooms, etc., may be tested by blowing out the piping with air at a pressure of at least 100 pounds per square inch.
# C_2013304EN.01000302.xml

| 19.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/3

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 July 2013 — Diadikasia Symvouloi Epicheiriseon AE v European Commission, EU Delegation to Turkey, Central Finance & Contracts Unit (CFCU)

(Case C-520/12 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance - Public procurement - Project for the enlargement of the European Turkish Business Centres Network - Decision not to award the project - Application for damages for the alleged losses - National decision - No involvement by European Union bodies)

2013/C 304/05

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Diadikasia Symvouloi Epicheiriseon AE (represented by: A. Krystallidis, avocat)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Aresu and F. Erlbacher, acting as Agents), EU Delegation to Turkey, Central Finance & Contracts Unit (CFCU)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 September 2012 in Case T-369/11 Diadikasia Symbouloi Epicheiriseon AE v European Commission, Central Finance & Contracts Unit (CFCU) and Delegation of the European Union to Turkey, by which the General Court dismissed an application for damages seeking compensation for harm allegedly suffered by the applicant following a decision by the Delegation of the European Union to Turkey not to award the applicant the contract to carry out the project ‘Enlargement of the European Turkish Business Centers Network to Sivas, Antakya, Batman and Van’ (EuropeAid/128621/D/SER/TR) — Inadmissibility — Lack of jurisdiction

Diadikasia Symbouloi Epicheiriseon AE

European Commission, Central Finance & Contracts Unit (CFCU) and Delegation of the European Union to Turkey

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Diadikasia Symvouloi Epicheiriseon AE to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Diadikasia Symvouloi Epicheiriseon AE to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.

1

---
§ 35.30-1 Warning signals and signs—TB/ALL. ( a ) *Red warning signals.* During transfer of bulk cargo while fast to a dock, a red signal (flag by day and electric lantern at night) shall be so placed that it will be visible on all sides. While transferring bulk cargo at anchor, a red flag only shall be displayed.
( b ) *Warning sign at gangway.* A sign shall be displayed to warn persons approaching the gangway, while a vessel is moored or anchored unless it is empty and gas-freed. The sign shall state in letters not less than 2 inches high substantially as follows: Warning No open lights. No smoking. No visitors.
( c ) *Warning sign in radio room.* A sign shall be placed in radio room warning against the use of radio equipment during transfer of Grade A, B, or C liquids, except by permission of senior deck officer.
( d ) [Reserved]
( e ) Additional placards or signs required in connection with the movement of certain open hopper type barges are described in § 35.01-45.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16704, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGFR 70-143, 35 FR 19905, Dec. 30, 1970; CGD 73-96, 42 FR 49024, Sept. 26, 1977; CGD 73-243, 45 FR 18000, Mar. 20, 1980]
§ 221.61 Compliance. ( a ) This subpart describes procedures for the administration of civil penalties that the Maritime Administration may assess under 46 U.S.C. 31309, 31330, and 56101, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 336.
( b ) Pursuant to 46 U.S.C. 31309, a general penalty of not more than $25,548 may be assessed for each violation of chapter 313 or 46 U.S.C. subtitle III administered by the Maritime Administration, and pursuant to the regulations in this part a person violating 46 U.S.C. 31329 is liable for a civil penalty of not more than $63,991 for each violation. A person who charters, sells, transfers, or mortgages a vessel, or an interest therein, in violation of 46 U.S.C. 56101(e) is liable for a civil penalty of not more than $25,712 for each violation.
[84 FR 37070, July 31, 2019, as amended at 88 FR 1124, Jan. 6, 2023; 88 FR 89559, Dec. 28, 2023]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of i2 Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jackson L. Wilson, Jr., Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|                                                   
|/s/ Jackson L. Wilson, Jr.                         
|Jackson L. Wilson, Jr.                             
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer March 10, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ROBERT ANDERSON,

Plaintiff, Case Number 15-11727

v. Honorable David M. Lawson

Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

KEVIN ALLEN JUTZY, M.D., RAUL

TUMNADA, P.A., and BADAWI 

ABELLATIF, M.D.,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, AND 

GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY 

DEFENDANTS BADAWI ABELLATIF AND RAUL TUMADA

Presently before the Court is the report issued on February 2, 2017 by Magistrate Judge R.

Steven Whalen pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that the Court construe the motion

to dismiss by defendants Badawi Abellatif and Raul Tumada as one for summary judgment, that the

Court should grant it, and that Abellatif and Tumada be dismissed without prejudice. Although the

magistrate judge’s report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may object to and seek

review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, no objections have been

filed thus far. The parties’ failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any

further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir.

1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the Court from its

duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the

Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [dkt.

#50] is ADOPTED.

2:15-cv-11727-DML-RSW Doc # 52 Filed 02/22/17 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 353
It is further ORDERED that the motion to dismiss by defendants Badawi Abellatif and Raul

Tumada [dkt. #34] is construed as one for summary judgment and is GRANTED. The claims

against defendants Badawi Abellatif and Raul Tumada are DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE. 

s/David M. Lawson 

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

Dated: February 22, 2017

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on February 22, 2017.

s/Susan Pinkowski 

SUSAN PINKOWSKI

-2-

2:15-cv-11727-DML-RSW Doc # 52 Filed 02/22/17 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 354
Dear Mr. McArthur: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition 

(Docket No. FAA−2015−2931). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s) (i.e., fixed-wing, rotorcraft, 

lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the 

maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the 

aircraft manual(s).

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or 

electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any 

further, we must receive the information described above by 11/11/15. If we do not receive the 

information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4549.

Sincerely,

/s/

Michael J. Cameron

Program Analyst
#### § 32.70-10 Cofferdams—TB/ALL.

Tank vessels carrying Grade A, B, or C liquids shall be required to conform to the construction requirements in regard to vertical cofferdams in § 32.65-15, except that a dry cargo compartment shall be considered to be equivalent to a cofferdam, and except as provided for in § 32.70-20.
#### § 31.40-15 Cargo Ship Safety Radio Certificate—T/ALL.

Every tankship equipped with a radio installation on an international voyage must have a Cargo Ship Safety Radio Certificate. Each radio installation must meet the requirements of the Federal Communication Commission and the International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea.

[USCG-1999-4976, 65 FR 6500, Feb. 9, 2000]
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1122 CA 11-00320**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, PERADOTTO, AND LINDLEY, JJ.

COLLEEN O’BRIEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LARRY J. BAINBRIDGE AND FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

BURDEN, GULISANO & HICKEY, LLC, BUFFALO (SARAH HANSEN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS.

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (JOHN A. COLLINS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy J. Drury, J.), entered September 14, 2010 in a personal injury action. The order denied the motion of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied the cross motion of plaintiff for partial summary judgment on the issue of serious injury.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied defendants’ motion is unanimously dismissed and the order is affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in O’Brien v Bainbridge ([appeal No. 2] ___ AD3d ___ [Nov. 18, 2011]).

Entered: November 18, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND OTHER
INTERNALLY GENERATED REPORTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         31,339
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         20
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               21,375
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    115,961
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           15,360
<LOANS>                                        228,476
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (3,354)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 423,649
<DEPOSITS>                                     378,630
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            5,564
<LONG-TERM>                                    5,316
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       28,405
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,734
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 423,649
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                19,186
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              4,648
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               1,406
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               25,240
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             8,024
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             8,345
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          16,895
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  1,046
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (235)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                28,494
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,878
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,607
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.83
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 0
<LOANS-NON>                                    767
<LOANS-PAST>                                   282
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               3,055
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  (1,076)
<RECOVERIES>                                   329
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              3,354
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1,084
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        2,270


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1





Certification


Pursuant
To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Highlands Bankshares, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2009 to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Samuel L. Neese, Executive
Vice President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/Samuel L. Neese


Samuel L.
Neese


Executive
Vice President and Chief Executive Officer


April 14,
2010
# C_2012013EN.01001903.xml

| 14.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/19

---

Action brought on 7 November 2011 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM

(Case T-571/11)

2012/C 13/41

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: E. Seijo Veiguela, lawyer, and J. L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Groupe Chez Gerard Restaurants Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 July 2011 in Case R 1946/2010-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 July 2011 in Case R 1946/2010-1;

| — | Order the defendant and, where appropriate, the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs, if that other party appears and contests the action. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant and, where appropriate, the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs, if that other party appears and contests the action.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Groupe Chez Gerard Restaurants Ltd.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘CLUB GOURMET’ for goods in Classes 16, 21, 29, 30, 32 and 33.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Applicant.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National figurative mark ‘CLUB DEL GOURMET, EN ... El Corte Inglés’, applications for the national word mark ‘EL SITIO DEL GOURMET’ and for the national and Community trade marks ‘CLUB DEL GOURMET’ for services in Class 35.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 as there is a likelihood of confusion between the trade marks at issue.

Pleas in law:

---
---

---

Exhibit 13

CERTIFICATION OF THE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF 
FINANCIAL OFFICER

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of Cimatron Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), we, Dan Haran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ilan Erez,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: June 28, 2007

| |  | By /s/ Dan Haran
Dan HaranPresident and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | By /s/ Ilan Erez
Ilan ErezChief Financial Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------



---

---