alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131327 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131327 

 COA: 269091 

Jackson CC: 04-005865-FH 

JONATHON PAUL RANUM, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 19, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
§ 34.15-25 Discharge outlets—T/ALL. ( a ) Discharge outlets shall be of an approved type.
#### § 385.9 Exceptions, deviations, or waivers.

Requests for exceptions, deviations, or waivers from the requirements of this part, unless exceptions are required by program legislation or program regulations, shall be submitted to the Grants Officer. Exceptions may be approved by the Grants Officer on matters within the scope of his authority, or obtained by said Grants Officer from higher authority within the Department of Transportation or from the Office of Management and Budget when required by law or other applicable Federal requirement.
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2480 

AN ACT 

To improve the accuracy of fur product labeling, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2480 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Truth in Fur Labeling 

3 Act of 2010’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF EXEMPTION TO FUR PRODUCT LA5 BELING REQUIREMENTS FOR PRODUCTS 

6 CONTAINING RELATIVELY SMALL QUAN7 TITIES OR VALUES OF FUR. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2(d) of the Fur Products 

9 Labeling Act (15 U.S.C. 69(d)) is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘; except that’’ and all that follows through ‘‘contained 

11 therein’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

13 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that is 90 days 

14 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

15 SEC. 3. EXEMPTION FOR DISCRETE SALES BY NON-RETAIL16 ERS. 

17 Section 3 of the Fur Products Labeling Act (15 

18 U.S.C. 69a) is amended by adding at the end the fol19 lowing: 

20 ‘‘(g) No provision of this Act shall apply to a fur 

21 product— 

22 ‘‘(1) the fur of which was obtained from an ani23 mal through trapping or hunting; and 

24 ‘‘(2) when sold in a face to face transaction at 

25 a place such as a residence, craft fair, or other loca26 tion used on a temporary or short term basis, by the 
3 

•HR 2480 EH

1 person who trapped or hunted the animal, where the 

2 revenue from the sale of apparel or fur products is 

3 not the primary source of income of such person.’’. 

4 SEC. 4. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION REVIEW OF FUR 

5 PRODUCTS NAME GUIDE. 

6 Not later than 90 days after the date of the enact7 ment of this Act, the Federal Trade Commission shall 

8 publish in the Federal Register notice of, and an oppor9 tunity to comment on, a review of the Fur Products Name 

10 Guide (16 CFR. 301.0). 

11 SEC. 5. PAYGO COMPLIANCE. 

12 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

13 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

14 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

15 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

16 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

17 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro18 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

19 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 28, 2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2480 

AN ACT 

To improve the accuracy of fur product labeling, 

and for other purposes.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending December 16, 2006

|Filer                          | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------------ | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|FIRST ARTESIA BANCSHARES, INC. | CIC           | Notice filed by The J.C. Gray Trust and Johnny C. Gray, as trustee, both of Artesia, New Mexico, and The T.L. Chandler Trust and Terry L. Chandler, as trustee, both of Carlsbad, New Mexico, to increase their ownership and control, from 7.04 percent to 42.74 percent, of First Artesia Bancshares, Inc., Artesia, New Mexico, and indirectly The First National Bank, Artesia, New Mexico. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:01/03/2007
|Newspaper:                     | Not available
|Federal Register:              | 01/03/2007   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
exv10w3



 






Exhibit 10.3




AGREEMENT NOT TO COMPETE




     As a condition to and in consideration of the award by MGIC Investment Corporation (the
“Company”) of shares of Restricted Stock (or Restricted Stock Units) pursuant to the 2002 Stock
Incentive Plan, to the individual signing this Agreement Not to Compete (hereinafter “Employee”),
Employee agrees that he will not render services to any competitor of the Company (a) during the
term of his employment and (b) for a period of one year after the termination of the Employee’s
employment, in the geographic area or areas (localized or national, as the case may be) in which he
was employed, assigned or otherwise worked on behalf of the Company, or a present or future parent,
subsidiary or affiliate of the Company (collectively, “Subsidiary”), during the three years prior
to the termination of his employment.



     For the purposes of this Agreement: (a) the term “competitor” means any company (regardless of
the form of its organization), including a proprietorship (i) engaged in the business of
guaranteeing or insuring mortgages in any geographic area in which the Company or any Subsidiary is
engaged in guaranteeing or insuring mortgages or (ii) engaged in any other business in which the
Company or any Subsidiary is engaged, in any geographic area in which the Company or any Subsidiary
is so engaged, but only if such business accounted for at least 10% of the revenues of the Company
and its subsidiaries, on a consolidated basis, during the twelve months preceding the month in
which the Employee’s employment terminated; and (b) the term “services” means services of the same
or similar nature to any services Employee rendered to the Company or subsidiaries during the
three-year period prior to Employee’s termination of employment.



     The provisions of this Agreement shall bind the Employee and inure to the benefit of the
Company, notwithstanding: (a) any termination of the Restricted Stock Award Agreement associated
with this Agreement, or any forfeiture of the related Restricted Stock (or Restricted Stock Units),
or (b) any issuance of shares to the Employee upon any termination of restrictions applicable to
any Restricted Stock or in settlement of any Restricted Stock Unit.



     The Employee acknowledges that the Company and each Subsidiary are third party beneficiaries
of this Agreement and each one is entitled to enforce the provisions of this Agreement by an action
for injunction, damages or both, and such other relief as may be proper.



     All terms capitalized in this Agreement shall have the respective meanings set forth in the
associated Restricted Stock Agreement, unless otherwise defined herein. The validity and
construction of this Agreement shall be governed by the internal laws of the State of Wisconsin
(excluding the conflict of laws provisions of such laws). This Agreement does not supersede or
modify any other agreement regarding non-competition of which the Company has the benefit.



     Dated: As of this ___day of ___, 200_.



	 	 	 
	

	 	

	

	 	Employee
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

BARBARA MITCHELL, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

ALLSTATE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-11707-GAD-EAS

 

STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY 

DISMISSAL OF ANY AND ALL OF 

PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS 

STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ANY AND ALL OF 

PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties, 

BARBARA MITCHELL and ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and their 

respective counsel that any and all of Plaintiff’s claims in the above-captioned 

matter are voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice, and without attorney’s fees, based 

on settlement of Plaintiff’s claims. F.R.C.P. 41(a). 

THIS IS A FINAL ORDER AND DISPOSES OF THIS CASE. 

SO ORDERED. 

Date: November 12, 2015 s/Gershwin A. Drain 

 Gershwin A. Drain 

 U.S. District Judge 

Case 2:15-cv-11707-GAD-EAS ECF No. 19, PageID.178 Filed 11/12/15 Page 1 of 2
Approved as to Form, Substance and Entry: 

/s/ Robert Heston 

Counsel for Plaintiff BARBARA 

MITCHELL 

/s/ Prerana R. Bacon 

Counsel for Defendant ALLSTATE 

INSURANCE COMPANY 

Dated: November 9, 2015 Dated: November 9, 2015 

 

Case 2:15-cv-11707-GAD-EAS ECF No. 19, PageID.179 Filed 11/12/15 Page 2 of 2
2:02-cv-72943-GCS Doc # 1 Filed 07/18/02 Pg 1 of 21 Pg ID 1
2:02-cv-72943-GCS Doc # 1 Filed 07/18/02 Pg 2 of 21 Pg ID 2
2:02-cv-72943-GCS Doc # 1 Filed 07/18/02 Pg 3 of 21 Pg ID 3
2:02-cv-72943-GCS Doc # 1 Filed 07/18/02 Pg 4 of 21 Pg ID 4
2:02-cv-72943-GCS Doc # 1 Filed 07/18/02 Pg 5 of 21 Pg ID 5
2:02-cv-72943-GCS Doc # 1 Filed 07/18/02 Pg 6 of 21 Pg ID 6
2:02-cv-72943-GCS Doc # 1 Filed 07/18/02 Pg 7 of 21 Pg ID 7
2:02-cv-72943-GCS Doc # 1 Filed 07/18/02 Pg 8 of 21 Pg ID 8
2:02-cv-72943-GCS Doc # 1 Filed 07/18/02 Pg 9 of 21 Pg ID 9
2:02-cv-72943-GCS Doc # 1 Filed 07/18/02 Pg 10 of 21 Pg ID 10
2:02-cv-72943-GCS Doc # 1 Filed 07/18/02 Pg 11 of 21 Pg ID 11
2:02-cv-72943-GCS Doc # 1 Filed 07/18/02 Pg 12 of 21 Pg ID 12
2:02-cv-72943-GCS Doc # 1 Filed 07/18/02 Pg 13 of 21 Pg ID 13
2:02-cv-72943-GCS Doc # 1 Filed 07/18/02 Pg 14 of 21 Pg ID 14
2:02-cv-72943-GCS Doc # 1 Filed 07/18/02 Pg 15 of 21 Pg ID 15
2:02-cv-72943-GCS Doc # 1 Filed 07/18/02 Pg 16 of 21 Pg ID 16
2:02-cv-72943-GCS Doc # 1 Filed 07/18/02 Pg 17 of 21 Pg ID 17
2:02-cv-72943-GCS Doc # 1 Filed 07/18/02 Pg 18 of 21 Pg ID 18
2:02-cv-72943-GCS Doc # 1 Filed 07/18/02 Pg 19 of 21 Pg ID 19
2:02-cv-72943-GCS Doc # 1 Filed 07/18/02 Pg 20 of 21 Pg ID 20
2:02-cv-72943-GCS Doc # 1 Filed 07/18/02 Pg 21 of 21 Pg ID 21
SUPREME COURT.

#### Hubert Houbie agt. Henry Volkening *et al.*

*New York, Special Term,*

*April,*1875.

*Tender? by a debio?' to his crédito?' mmt be ?nade if the crédito?' is within the state.*

A debtor is bound to seek his creditor in order to make a tender, if he be within the state.

In England the debtor is not bound to follow his creditor beyond the four seas to make a tender.

The plaintiff’s mortgagee having removed from the state and gone to reside in Europe, after the making and delivery of the bond and mortgage, and not having left any person within this state to receive the interest and installments as they became due, the defendant was relieved from the obligation to make a tender.

*Hugh Duffy,*for plaintiff.

*Van Schaick, Gillender &*Thompson, for defendant.

Van Brunt, J.

In the case of *Smith*agt. *Smith*(25 *Wend.,*405) the rule seems to be laid down that the debtor is bound to seek his creditor in order to make a tender, if he be within the state. If a contract is made in this state, between residents in this state, the presumption is that it is to be performed within this state; and it would be a great hardship to compel the debtor to travel all the world over=to make his tender. The rule has long been established in England that the debtor was not bound to. follow his creditor beyond the four seas to make a tender, and the same rule has been adopted in our state. The plaintiff having removed *170from the state and gone to reside in Europe, after the making and delivery of the bond and mortgage, and not having left any person within this state to receive the interest and installments as they became due, the defendant was relieved from the obligation to make a tender. The first information he had that the plaintiff had authorized any person in this state to act for him was by the service of the papers in this action, whereupon he made a tender of both principal due, and interest, to the attorney, which was refused. This tender was a good tender, and the lien of the mortgage became to that extent discharged *(Kortwright*agt. Cady, 21 *N*. *Y.,*343). But the defendant having failed to bring the money into court with his answer, the complaint cannot be dismissed, and the plaintiff is entitled to a money judgment for amount due, and interest, but without costs.-
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 98 (Tuesday, May 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 28715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2565]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


Agenda; Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date: 9:30 a.m., Wednesday, May 30, 2007.

Place: NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20594.

Status: The two items are open to the public.

Matters To Be Considered:
    7756B--Aircraft Accident Report--In-flight Separation of Right 
Wing, Flying Boat, Inc., doing business as Chalk's Ocean Airways Flight 
101, Grumman G-73T, N2969, Port of Miami, Florida, December 19, 2005.
    7883--Marine Accident Brief and Safety Recommendation Letters--
Grounding of Hong Kong-Registered Container Ship New Delhi Express, 
Kill Van Kull Waterway, New York Harbor, April 15, 2006.
    News Media Contact: Telephone: (202) 314-6100.
    Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Chris 
Bisett at (202) 314-6305 by Friday, May 25, 2007.
    The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by 
accessing a link under ``News & Events'' on the NTSB home page at 
http://www.ntsb.gov.

For More Information Contact: Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

    Dated: Friday, May 18, 2007.
Vicky D'Onofrio,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-2565 Filed 5-18-07; 1:58 pm]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
# C_2012217EN.01000502.xml

| 21.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/5

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 3 April 2012 — DMC Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH v Finanzamt Hamburg-Mitte

(Case C-164/12)

2012/C 217/09

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: DMC Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt Hamburg-Mitte

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is it compatible with Article 43 EC (or Article 49 TFEU) for a national provision to provide that, in the event of the contribution of partnership interests to a capital company, the business assets contributed must be assessed at their value as part of a going concern (and consequently, as a result of revealing undisclosed reserves, a capital gain arises for the transferor) where at the time of the non-cash contribution the Federal Republic of Germany has no right to tax in relation to the gain on the sale of the new company shares granted to the transferor in return for the contribution? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is it compatible with Article 43 EC (or Article 49 TFEU) for a national provision to provide that, in the event of the contribution of partnership interests to a capital company, the business assets contributed must be assessed at their value as part of a going concern (and consequently, as a result of revealing undisclosed reserves, a capital gain arises for the transferor) where at the time of the non-cash contribution the Federal Republic of Germany has no right to tax in relation to the gain on the sale of the new company shares granted to the transferor in return for the contribution?

| 2. | In the event that the first question must be answered in the negative: is the national provision compatible with Article 43 EC (or Article 49 TFEU) if the transferor is entitled to apply for the deferment, on an interest-free basis, of the tax arising as a consequence of revealing the undisclosed reserves, with the effect that the tax due on the gain may be paid in annual instalments, each of at least a fifth of the tax due, provided that the payment of the instalments is secured? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In the event that the first question must be answered in the negative: is the national provision compatible with Article 43 EC (or Article 49 TFEU) if the transferor is entitled to apply for the deferment, on an interest-free basis, of the tax arising as a consequence of revealing the undisclosed reserves, with the effect that the tax due on the gain may be paid in annual instalments, each of at least a fifth of the tax due, provided that the payment of the instalments is secured?

---
#### § 310.12-1 Form of Agreement.

The form of agreement between the Maritime Administrator and schools for annual maintenance and support payments, Federal student subsistence and incentive payments and fuel assistance under the 1958 Act and the Act may be obtained from the Office of Policy and Plans, Maritime Administration, 400 7th St., SW., Washington, DC 20590.

[70 FR 28833, May 19, 2005]
# Dor-osr

- \^^^ ' ^^ ^



# Star k County , Nort hDakot a OFFIC E O FTH E AUDITO R P C Bo x 13 0 .:: ^ i^r^.ii ^ Dickinson , Nort hDakot a58602-013 0 " ^ o^c> ^ Phone : (701 ) 456-763 0 ^ r^s S www.starkcountynd.co m^S ^ BOAR D O FCOMMISSIONER S AUDIT( » cd^ O DUANEWOL

FKA Y HAi* g '^"ZT ^ KE N ZANDE R^ ^ ^ JA Y ELKI N <-|[ } PET E KUNT Z - ^ RUS S HOF

F
Octobe r 18 , 201 0 Mr
. Denni s DeVan y U S Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s X-5 3 40 0 7 * S t S W Washingto n D.C
. 2059 0 M r DeVany ; Th e Star k Count y Commissio n ha s conferre dwit hth e Dickinso n Municipa l Airport Authorit y an dagree s wit hthei r recommendatio n for

Grea t Lake s Airline s t o continu e servic e for

th e Cit y o f

Dickinson
. Star k Count y i s i n th e heart

o f agrowin g econom y tha t i s bein g fuele db y th e energ y potentia l o f

Southwes t

ND
. Ai r servic e i s an integra l par t o f an y econom y an deve n mor e s o wit hagrowin g econom y suc ha s Stark County's
. Grea t

Lakes , ove r th e las t seventee n year s ha s improve dit s operation s t o mee t th e need s o f

Star k Count y an dha s becom e atruste dairline
. I urg e yo u t o continu e airlin e servic e wit h Great Lake s a s i t

i s crucia l for

Stark Count y t o hav e a n establishe dai r carrie r tha t meet s th e need s o f

th e growin g economy . I appreciat e all th e work

yo u an dyou r

staf f hav e don e t o establis han dretai n ai r servic e fo r

Star k County
. Sincerely ,
Duan e A
. Wolf

, Qrairma n Star k Coimty Commissio n
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             649
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            5619
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             848
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              1005
<LOANS>                                          45348
<ALLOWANCE>                                        201
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   61670
<DEPOSITS>                                       42237
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                671
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                       18749
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   61670
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   3350
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  723
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  4073
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                2333
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2333
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             1740
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       10
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   1144
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    685
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         685
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       461
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.91
<LOANS-NON>                                        601
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     67
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   201
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       10
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  201
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               201
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>