alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2330 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 3, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to carry out a study 

to determine the suitability and feasibility of establishing 

Camp Hale as a unit of the National Park System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

HR 2330 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Camp Hale Study 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY OF THE SUITABILITY 

5 AND FEASIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING CAMP 

6 HALE AS A UNIT OF THE NATIONAL PARK 

7 SYSTEM. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior, act9 ing through the Director of the National Park Service 

10 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Secretary’’), shall com11 plete a special resource study of Camp Hale to deter12 mine— 

13 (1) the suitability and feasibility of designating 

14 Camp Hale as a separate unit of the National Park 

15 System; and 

16 (2) the methods and means for the protection 

17 and interpretation of Camp Hale by the National 

18 Park Service, other Federal, State, or local govern19 ment entities or private or nonprofit organizations. 

20 (b) STUDY REQUIREMENTS.—The Secretary shall 

21 conduct the study in accordance with section 8(c) of Pub22 lic Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5(c)). 

23 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date 

24 on which funds are made available to carry out this Act, 

25 the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Natural 

26 Resources of the House of Representatives and the ComVerDate Nov 24 2008 23:40 Jun 03, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2330.RFS H2330

smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

HR 2330 RFS 

1 mittee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate 

2 a report containing— 

3 (1) the results of the study; and 

4 (2) any recommendations of the Secretary. 

5 SEC. 3. EFFECT OF STUDY. 

6 Nothing in this Act shall affect valid existing rights, 

7 including— 

8 (1) all interstate water compacts in existence on 

9 the date of the enactment of this Act (including full 

10 development of any apportionment made in accord11 ance with the compacts); 

12 (2) water rights decreed at the Camp Hale site 

13 or flowing within, below, or through the Camp Hale 

14 site; 

15 (3) water rights in the State of Colorado; 

16 (4) water rights held by the United States; and 

17 (5) the management and operation of any res18 ervoir, including the storage, management, release, 

19 or transportation of water. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 2, 2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Hemlock Semiconductor

Corporation,

Plaintiff(s),

v. Case No. 1:15−cv−11236−TLL−PTM

Hon. Thomas L. Ludington

Kyocera Corporation,

Defendant(s).

NOTICE TO PARTIES REGARDING CONSOLIDATED CASE

 To comply with the Order of Consolidation entered in this case on 03/08/2016 by Judge

Thomas L. Ludington, filings from this point forward will only be made in case number

15−11236 and all other cases will be closed.

 The following documents that are not currently filed in the designed lead case MUST BE

REFILED IN THE LEAD CASE WITHIN SEVEN DAYS OF THIS NOTICE:

• Pending Motions

• Responses, Replies and Supplemental Briefs to pending motions

Counterclaims, Cross Claims or Third−Party Complaints that have not been answered

by all parties (answering parties will not need to re−file answers from the member

cases)

• 

 All original deadlines and hearings remain in effect, unless otherwise notified by judge's

chambers.

Certificate of Service

 I hereby certify that on this date a copy of the foregoing notice was served upon the parties

and/or counsel of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail.

s/ S. Schoenherr 

Deputy Clerk

Dated: March 11, 2016

1:15-cv-11236-TLL-PTM Doc # 83 Filed 03/11/16 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 3940
#### § 204.1 Scope and procedure for filing claims.

This part prescribes the requirements and procedure for administrative settlement of claims against the United States, involving the Maritime Administration, under the Federal Tort Claims Act, based on death, personal injury, or damage to or loss of property. The controlling regulations are promulgated by the Department of Justice at 28 CFR Part 14—Administrative Claims Under Federal Tort Claims Act. These regulations supplement those of the Department of Justice and provide specific guidance regarding claims processing in the Maritime Administration.
#### Daniel J. Noyes, *Executor, etc., Appellant, v.*The New York Savings Bank and Lewis H. Bailey, *as Executer, etc., Respondents*.

Order modified by adding thereto a direction that the money be paid into court by the savings bank to abide the further order of the court, without prejudice to the bond required by the order, and witb leave to tire savings bank to make such application as it shall be advised for relief from the action.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001070677
<NAME> US XCHANGE, L.L.C.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      10,463,257
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,032,748
<ALLOWANCES>                                   259,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,588,043
<PP&E>                                     118,280,214
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,474,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             204,653,348
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,650,704
<BONDS>                                    202,400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    60,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (77,397,357)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               204,653,348
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,339,437
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,524,023
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,933,844
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (20,808,245)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (20,808,245)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (20,808,245)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 25.30-15 Fixed fire extinguishing systems. ( a ) When a fixed fire extinguishing system is installed, it must be a type approved or accepted by the Commandant (CG-ENG-4) or the Commanding Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Center.
( b ) If the system is a carbon-dioxide type, then it must be designed and installed in accordance with subpart 76.15 of part 76 of subchapter H (Passenger Vessels) of this chapter.
( c ) If the system is an automatic sprinkler system then it must be designed and installed in accordance with Chapter 25 of NFPA 13 (incorporated by reference, see § 25.01-3).
[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48245, July 22, 2016]
#### Charles N. Brown and others, *Appellants, v.*Norman W. Dodge and others, *Respondents.*

The judgments in favor of' Fonda & Howard and Dodge, Miggs & Oo., respectively, reversed, and new trial as between them and the owner ordered in the Onondaga County Court, costs of this appeal to abide event. In all other respects the judgments are affirmed. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.
#### § 170.080 Stability booklet.

Before issuing an original certificate of inspection, the following number of copies of the stability booklet required by § 170.110 must be submitted for approval; three copies for plan review being conducted by the Coast Guard Marine Safety Center.

[CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51217, Sept. 30, 1997, as amended by USCG-2007-0030, 75 FR 78083, Dec. 14, 2010]
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of SoundView Technology
Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mark F. Loehr,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

    (1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
       Company.

<Table>
<S>                                                         <C>
                                                            /s/ MARK F. LOEHR
                                                            ---------------------------------
                                                            Mark F. Loehr
                                                            CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
</Table>

November 14, 2002
Editorial Note on Part 199
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 199 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59789, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 199.280 Survival craft embarkation and launching arrangements. ( a ) Each lifeboat must be arranged to be boarded and launched directly from the stowed position.
( b ) Each davit-launched liferaft must be arranged to be boarded and launched from a position immediately adjacent to the stowed position or from a position where, under § 199.130(c)(4), the liferaft is transferred before launching.
( c ) Cargo vessels of 20,000 tons gross tonnage or more must carry lifeboats that are capable of being launched, using painters if necessary, with the vessel making headway at speeds up to 5 knots in clam water.
( d ) All survival craft required for abandonment by the total number of persons on board must be capable of being launched with their full complement of persons and equipment within 10 minutes from the time the abandon-ship signal is given.
( e ) On a tank vessel carrying crude oil, product, chemicals, or liquefied gases, notwithstanding the requirements of § 199.150(c), each launching appliance, together with its lowering and recovery gear, must be arranged so that the fully equipped survival craft the launching appliance serves can be safely lowered on the lower side of the vessel at the angle of heel after damage calculated in accordance with— ( 1 ) The International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as amended by the Protocol of 1978 (MARPOL 73/78), in the case of an oil tanker;
( 2 ) The International Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships carrying Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk (incorporated by reference, see § 199.05), in the case of a chemical tanker; or
( 3 ) The International Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk (incorporated by reference, see § 199.05), in the case of a gas carrier.
[CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25313, May 20, 1996, as amended by USCG-1999-6216, 64 FR 53229, Oct. 1, 1999; USCG-2020-0107, 87 FR 68310, Nov. 14, 2022]
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                          AERIAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                  SUBSIDIARIES OF AERIAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                    STATE OF
                                                                                 INCORPORATION
LEGAL NAME                                                                      OR ORGANIZATION
------------------------------------------------------------------------------  ----------------
<S>                                                                             <C>
APT Columbus, Inc.............................................................      Delaware
APT Kansas City, Inc..........................................................      Delaware
APT Tampa/Orlando, Inc........................................................      Delaware
APT Minneapolis, Inc..........................................................      Delaware
APT Houston, Inc..............................................................      Delaware
APT Pittsburgh Limited Partnership............................................      Delaware
APT Operating Company, Inc....................................................      Delaware
APT Pittsburgh General Partner, Inc...........................................      Delaware
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 88 (Tuesday, May 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2245]



[[Page 26199]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 4 Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel (Including the States of Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, 
Ohio, Tennessee, and Wisconsin)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 4 Committee of the Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel will be conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, June 19, 2007, at 10 a.m., 
Central Time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Ann Delzer at 188-912-1227, or 
(414) 231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 4 Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel 
will be held Tuesday, June 19, 2007, at 10 a.m., Central Time via a 
telephone conference call. You can submit written comments to the Panel 
by faxing the comments to (414) 231-2363, or by mail to Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel, Stop 1006MIL, PO Box 3205, Milwaukee, WI 53201-3205, or 
you can contact us at http://www.improveirs.org. This meeting is not 
required to be open to the public, but because we are always interested 
in community input we will accept public comments. Please contact Mary 
Ann Delzer at 188-912-1227 or (414) 231-2360 for dial-in information.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: April 27, 2007.
John Fay,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 07-2245 Filed 5-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-M
§ 197.452 Oxygen cleaning. The diving supervisor shall ensure that equipment used with oxygen or oxygen mixtures greater than 40 percent by volume is cleaned of flammable materials— ( a ) Before being placed into service; and
( b ) After any repair, alteration, modification, or suspected contamination.
§ 169.545 Markings. ( a ) Each personal flotation device must be marked with the vessel's name.
( b ) Where PFDs are stowed so that they are not readily visible to persons onboard, the containers in which they are stowed must be marked “adult personal flotation devices” or “child personal flotation devices”, as appropriate, and with the number contained therein, in at least 1-inch letters and figures.
( c ) Each personal flotation device carried on vessels certificated for exposed or partially protected waters service must have a light approved under subpart 161.012 of this chapter. The light must be securely attached to the front shoulder area of the personal flotation device.
( d ) Each personal flotation device must have at least 200 sq. cm. (31 sq. in.) of retroreflective material attached on its front side and at least 200 sq. cm. on its back side. If the personal flotation device is reversible, retroreflective material must be applied as described above on both sides.
( e ) Retroreflective material required by this section must be Type I material that is approved under subpart 164.018 of this chapter.
AMENDMENT TO THE MATRIA HEALTHCARE, INC.
                 1996 DIRECTORS' NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLAN
             APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON FEBRUARY 24, 1998
                     AND BY THE STOCKHOLDERS ON MAY 18, 1998

          Paragraph 5(b) of the Matria Healthcare, Inc. 1996 Directors'
         Non-qualified  Stock  Option  Plan is hereby  amended by  deleting  the
         second  sentence  therein  and  substituting   therefor  the  following
         sentence:

                  "Beginning  with the first  annual  meeting  of the  Company's
                  stockholders  following the Initial Grant Date and  thereafter
                  at  each   subsequent   annual   meeting   of  the   Company's
                  stockholders,  each  Outside  Director  who  continues  as  an
                  Outside  Director  immediately   following  each  such  annual
                  meeting  shall be granted an option to purchase  10,000 shares
                  of Stock  ("Subsequent  Grant");  provided  that no Subsequent
                  Grant shall be made to any Outside Director who has not served
                  as an Outside Director of the Company,  as of the time of such
                  annual meeting, for at least one year."

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  undersigned  has executed this  Amendment on
behalf of Matria Healthcare, Inc. effective May 18, 1998.

                                            MATRIA HEALTHCARE, INC.


                                            By_________________________________
                                              Donald R. Millard, President
# C_2014462EN.01000202.xml

| 22.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Welmory sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Gdańsku

(Case C-605/12) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 44 - Concept of ‘fixed establishment’ of the recipient of a supply of services - Place where services are deemed to be supplied to taxable persons - Intra-Community transaction))

(2014/C 462/03)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Welmory sp. z o.o.

Applicant:

Defendant: Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Gdańsku

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

A first taxable person who has established his business in one Member State, and receives services supplied by a second taxable person established in another Member State, must be regarded as having a ‘fixed establishment’ within the meaning of Article 44 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as amended by Council Directive 2008/8/EC of 12 February 2008, in that other Member State, for the purpose of determining the place of taxation of those services, if that establishment is characterised by a sufficient degree of permanence and a suitable structure in terms of human and technical resources to enable it to receive the services supplied to it and use them for its business, which is for the referring court to ascertain.

---

(1)  OJ C 79, 16.3.2013.

1

---
§ 296.24 Subsequent awards of MSP Operating Agreements. ( a ) MARAD intends to ensure that all available MSP Operating Agreements are fully utilized at all times in order to maximize the benefit of the MSP. Accordingly, when an MSP Operating Agreement becomes available through termination by the Secretary or early termination by the MSP contractor, and no transfer under 46 U.S.C. 53105(e) is involved, MARAD will reissue the MSP Operating Agreement pursuant to the following criteria: ( 1 ) The proposed vessel shall meet the requirements for vessel eligibility in 46 U.S.C. 53102(b);
( 2 ) The applicant shall meet the vessel ownership and operating requirements for priority in 46 U.S.C. 53102(c); and
( 3 ) Priority will be assigned on the basis of vessel type established by military requirements specified by the Secretary of Defense. After consideration of military requirements, priority shall be given to an applicant that is a United States citizen under section 50501 of this title.
( b ) MARAD shall allow an applicant at least 30 days to submit an application for a new MSP Operating Agreement.
( c ) MARAD and USTRANSCOM will determine if the applications received form an adequate pool for award of a reissued MSP Operating Agreement. If so, MARAD will award a reissued MSP Operating Agreement from that pool of qualified applicants in its discretion according to the procedures of paragraph (a) of this section, subject to approval of the Secretary of Defense. MARAD and USTRANSCOM may decide to open a new round of applications. MARAD shall provide written reasons for denying applications. In as much as MSP furthers a public purpose and MARAD does not acquire goods or services through MSP, the selection process for award of MSP Operating Agreements does not constitute an acquisition process subject to any procurement law or the Federal Acquisition Regulations.
[82 FR 56897, Dec. 1, 2017]
§ 34.25-1 Application—T/ALL. ( a ) Where a water spray extinguishing system is installed, the provisions of this subpart, with the exception of § 34.25-90, shall apply to all installations contracted for on or after January 1, 1964. Installations contracted for prior to January 1, 1964, shall meet the requirements of § 34.50-90.
#### § 272.44 Dates.

The dates noted on the letters or notifications sent to the Operator by officials of the Region Office, any Director or any other official or MARAD, pursuant to the provisions of this part, shall be conclusive for the purposes of determining the timeliness of any requests for review made under the provisions of this part.