alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 287
Editorial Note: The regulations contained in this part were codified by the Internal Revenue Service in Treasury Decision 6820, 30 FR 6030, Apr. 29, 1965. For text see also 26 CFR part 2.

§ 287.9 Valuation of securities in fund. ( a ) *Equipment values.* In cases where securities are deposited in the fund in lieu of cash, or are purchased with cash on deposit in the fund, or are substituted for securities in the fund, the value of such securities must not be less than the amount of cash in lieu of which they are so deposited or with which they are so purchased, or the value at the time of deposit of the securities for which they were so substituted. If the securities on deposit in the fund are replaced by cash from the general funds of the taxpayer, the amount of cash to be deposited in the fund in lieu thereof shall be not less than the amount at which such securities were valued at the time of their deposit in the fund.
( b ) *Determination of value.* ( 1 ) For the purpose of determining the amount in the fund, the value of securities shall be their “market value” (which shall be the basis for determining value, unless otherwise agreed to by the administration) and shall be determined in the following manner: ( i ) In instances where no actual purchase is involved, such as the initial deposit of securities in the fund in lieu of cash, the last sales price thereof on the principal exchange on the day the deposit was made shall be deemed to be the “market value” thereof, or, if no such sales were made, the “market value” thereof will be determined by the Administration on such basis as it may deem to be fair and reasonable in each case.
( ii ) In instances where the purchase of securities with cash on deposit in the fund is involved, “market value” shall be the gross price paid (adjusted for accrued interest); *Provided,* That if such securities are purchased otherwise than upon a registered exchange the price shall be within the range of transactions on the exchange on the date of such purchase, or, if there were no such transactions, then the “market value” thereof will be determined by the Administration on such basis as it may deem to be fair and reasonable in each case.
( 2 ) Purchase-money obligations secured by mortgages on vessels sold or irrevocable commitments to finance the construction or acquisition of new vessels which are deposited in the construction reserve fund as provided in § 287.13 ordinarily will be considered as equivalent to their face value.
§ 385.34 Responsibility for issuing solicitations for proposals or applications. ( a ) It is MarAd policy to favor solicitation of proposals or applications, where discretionary assistance awards are available, in preference to relying on unsolicited proposals, in order to maximize opportunities for open participation by the public in MarAd assistance awards.
( b ) The Awards Officer shall be responsible for issuing solicitations, announcements, or the like, which call for the submission of proposals and applications by a certain due date which, if favorably acted upon by MarAd, may result in assistance awards.
# C_2013108EN.01001302.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/13

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 7 February 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Tivoli — Italy) — Antonella Pedone v N

(Case C-498/12) (1)

1

(Preliminary references - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Requirement of link with European Union law - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

2013/C 108/26

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Tivoli

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Antonella Pedone

Applicant:

Defendant: N

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale di Tivoli — Interpretation of Article 47(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, read in conjunction with Article 6 TEU and Article 52(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Legal aid — National legislation providing that consultancy fees are to be reduced by half where the client has been granted legal aid

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the questions referred for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunale di Tivoli (Italy).

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.

1

---
#### Francis E. Burrows, *Plaintiff, v.*Nathaniel K. Thompson, *Defendant*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Brady, P. J.
#### § 3.03-1 Vessels subject to the requirements of this part.

The regulations in this part are applicable to U.S. flag vessels desiring designation as oceanographic research vessels in accordance with 46 U.S.C. 2101.

[CGD 77-081, 46 FR 56202, Nov. 16, 1981, as amended by CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51195, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2005-22329, 70 FR 57183, Sept. 30, 2005; USCG-2023-0759, 89 FR 22948, Apr. 3, 2024]
CERTIFICATE OFSERVICE



### I, James W. Tello, hereby certify that

### I caused the Application of Miami Air International, Inc., for an Emergency Exemption, previously filed in Docket DOT

-OST

-2012

-0082, and served by first class mail on May 18,2012, on the service list accompanying that application, to be s a1 service by e-mail on May 22,2012 in accordance with t 

# r I" James W. ~ellou Service List 40

-Mile Air, Leif Wilson Air Excursions, Mike Loverink Alaska Central Express, John Seamon AIaska Central Express, Mike Bergt Alaska Central Express, Steve Endlich Alaska Seaplanes, Craig Loken Arctic Circle, Robert Hajducovich Bering Air, James Rowe Frontier Flying, Bob Hajducovich Grant Aviation, Bruce McGlasson Hageland, Mike Hageland Homer Air Iliamna Air Taxi, Tim Laporte Inland Aviation, Stephen Hill Island Air Service (Redemption) Katmai Air, Sonny Peterson Lynden Air Cargo, Judy McKenzie FortyMi@,APTAIaska.net - mloverink@yahoo.com john@ACEAirCargo.com MBergt@gci.net endlich@aceaircargo.com AKSeaplanes@Alaska.com bob@FrontierFlying.com Jim@BeringAir.com bob@FrontierFlying.com BMcGlasson@FlyGrant.com MikeH@POBox.Alaska.net Andy Smircich homerair@alaska.net 

### iliamnaairtaxi@starband.net Dom~inland@yahoo.com stanford@alaska.com

Judy@,lac.lvnden.comNorthern Air Cargo, David Karp dkarp@nac.aero Pacific Airways, Stephen Montanus stevem@flypacificairways.com PenAir, Orin Seybert orin@Penair.com PM Air, d/b/a Promech, Marc Sessoms 

### Marcsessoms@promechair.com Servant Air, Wes Osowski wosowski@servantair.com Smokey Bay, Claire McCann smba@Alaska.net Spernak Airways, Miek Spemak france@mtaonline.net Tanana Air Service (Bidzy), Brian Martin 

### wingnut@mcgrathAlaska.net Taquan Air Service. Brien Salazaar brien@taquanair.com Tatonduk, Owner, Robert Everts REverts@evertsair.com Wings ofAlaska (Seaport), Bob Jacobsen WingsAk@AOL.COM Wings of Alaska, Michelle Donohue 

### michelle@wingsofalaska.com Warbelows Air Ventures, Arthur Warbelow art@warbelows.com Wright Air Service, Bob Bursiel bbursiel@,alaska.net Yute (Flight Alaska), TimVottis TimVoWs@FltAlaska.net
§ 380.11 Designation of American Great Lakes Vessels. The Secretary shall designate a vessel as an American Great Lakes vessel if— ( a ) The vessel is documented under the laws of the United States;
( b ) ( 1 ) The vessel is not more than 6 years old, and not less than 1 year old, on the effective date of the designation; or
( 2 ) The vessel is not more than 11 years old, and not less than 1 year old, on the effective date of the designation, and the Secretary determines that suitable vessels are not available for providing the type of service for which the vessel will be used after designation;
( c ) The vessel has not been previously designated as an American Great Lakes vessel; and
( d ) The person who will be the owner of the vessel at the time of such designation agrees to enter into an agreement with the Secretary which provides that if the Secretary determines that the vessel is necessary to the defense of the United States, the United States Government shall have, during the 120-day period following the date of any revocation of such designation an exclusive right to purchase the vessel for a price equal to— ( 1 ) The approximate world market value of the vessel; or
( 2 ) The cost of the vessel to the owner less an amount representing reasonable depreciation of the vessel, whichever is greater.
2:15-cr-20007-LJM-DRG   Doc # 258   Filed 06/22/17   Pg 1 of 2    Pg ID 3203

2:15-cr-20007-LJM-DRG   Doc # 258   Filed 06/22/17   Pg 2 of 2    Pg ID 3204
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2504 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2504

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an increase in 
  the annual amount authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of 
   Veterans Affairs to carry out comprehensive service programs for 
                           homeless veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2009

  Mr. Teague introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an increase in 
  the annual amount authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of 
   Veterans Affairs to carry out comprehensive service programs for 
                           homeless veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AMOUNT AUTHORIZED TO BE APPROPRIATED FOR 
              COMPREHENSIVE SERVICE PROGRAMS FOR HOMELESS VETERANS.

    Section 2013 of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``fiscal year 2007'' and inserting ``fiscal 
        year 2010''; and
            (2) by striking ``$150,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$200,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.4



RENEWAL OF



EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN



DREW K. HOSTETTER AND



SUSQUEHANNA BANCSHARES, INC.



As of February 28, 2004, the employment of Drew K. Hostetter is hereby deemed to be renewed for three (3) years under the terms and conditions per the Employment Agreement dated March 12, 2001 (but effective as
of February 28, 2001), as amended.



The base salary as per
Section 4.1 will be $313,920.00 per year.



|                      |  |  |  |                        |  |                                    |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------- |  | 
|                      |  |  |  |                        |  | SUSQUEHANNA BANCSHARES, INC.      
|Attest:               |  |  |  |                        |  |                                   
|                      |  |  | 
|/s/ Lisa M. Cavage    |  |  |  | By:                    |  | /s/ Edward Balderston, Jr.        
|Secretary and Counsel |  |  |  | Edward Balderston, Jr.
|                      |  |  |  |                        |  | EVP & Chief Administrative Officer
|                      |  |  | 
|[SEAL]                |  |  |  |                        |  |
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 243 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require the arbitration of 

initial contract negotiation disputes, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2009 

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require the 

arbitration of initial contract negotiation disputes, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Labor Relations First 

5 Contract Negotiations Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INITIAL CONTRACT DISPUTES. 

7 Section 8 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

8 U.S.C. 158) is amended by adding at the end the following 

9 new subsection: 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

HR 243 IH 

1 ‘‘(h)(1) If, not later than 60 days after the certifi2 cation of a new representative of employees for the pur3 pose of collective bargaining, the employer of the employ4 ees and the representative have not reached a collective 

5 bargaining agreement with respect to the terms and condi6 tions of employment, the employer and the representative 

7 shall jointly select a mediator to mediate those issues on 

8 which the employer and the representative cannot agree. 

9 ‘‘(2) If the employer and the representative are un10 able to agree upon a mediator, either party may request 

11 the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service to select 

12 a mediator and the Federal Mediation and Conciliation 

13 Service shall upon the request select a person to serve as 

14 mediator. 

15 ‘‘(3) If, not later than 30 days after the date of the 

16 selection of a mediator under paragraph (1) or (2), the 

17 employer and the representative have not reached an 

18 agreement, the employer or the representative may trans19 fer the matters remaining in controversy to the Federal 

20 Mediation and Conciliation Service for binding arbitra21 tion.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
§ 194.20-19 Piping and electrical requirements. ( a ) Piping, electrical equipment, and wiring shall not be installed within or pass through a chemical storeroom except as required for the chemical storeroom itself.
( b ) The electrical installation shall be in accordance with the applicable requirements of Subchapter J (Electrical Engineering) of this chapter for Class I, Division 1, Group C hazardous locations.
#### § 197.520 Performance standard.

No person may be subjected to a personal exposure in excess of the permissible exposure limits unless respiratory protection is used.
#### The Bowery National Bank of New York, *Respondent, v.*James Kehoe, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc*.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
<PAGE>

                           CENTRAL FEDERAL CORPORATION
                                  Exhibit 32.2
                           Section 1350 Certifications

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Central Federal Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Therese
Ann Liutkus, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: August 13, 2004                    By: /s/ Therese Ann Liutkus
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Therese Ann Liutkus, CPA
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              (Principal Financial Officer)

                                                                             29.
§ 193.15-16 Lockout valves. ( a ) A lockout valve must be provided on any carbon dioxide extinguishing system protecting a space over 6,000 cubic feet in volume and installed or altered after [July 9, 2013. “Altered” means modified or refurbished beyond the maintenance required by the manufacturer's design, installation, operation and maintenance manual.
( b ) The lockout valve must be a manually operated valve located in the discharge manifold prior to the stop valve or selector valves. When in the closed position, the lockout valve must provide complete isolation of the system from the protected space or spaces, making it impossible for carbon dioxide to discharge in the event of equipment failure during maintenance.
( c ) The lockout valve design or locking mechanism must make it obvious whether the valve is open or closed.
( d ) A valve is considered a lockout valve if it has a hasp or other means of attachment to which, or through which, a lock can be affixed, or it has a locking mechanism built into it.
( e ) The master or person-in-charge must ensure that the valve is locked open at all times, except while maintenance is being performed on the extinguishing system, when the valve must be locked in the closed position.
( f ) Lockout valves added to existing systems must be approved by the Commandant as part of the installed system.
[USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33893, June 7, 2012]
## In the Court of Appeals Second Ap pellate District of Texas at F ort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 21

- 00378

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 325th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 325

- 704950

- 21
Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr 

### I N THE 

### I NTEREST OF 

### C.R., A 

### C HILD2 MEMORA NDUM OPINION Appella nt S. R., proceedin g pro se, at tem pt s to appeal fr om an “ Order Denyi ng Re quest for Recusal ” signed by the pre siding judge of the E ighth Adm inistrative Jud icial R egion
. See generally Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a, 18b (b)
. We notified S.R. of our

co n cern that we lack jurisd iction over th is appeal bec aus e the “ Order Denyi ng Re quest for Recusal ” did not appear to be a final judgment or appealable inter locutory order. We informed h er that unless she or any par ty desiring to con t in ue the appeal file d a r esponse wi thin ten days show ing grounds f or co ntinuing the appeal, we would di smiss i t for want of jurisdiction
. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3 (a), 44.3. Ten days have passed, and w e have received n o response. “ An order denying a motion to recu se may be reviewe d o nly for an abuse of di scretion on appeal from the final judgment .” Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a(j)(1 )(A ) (emphasis added). The trial

- court clerk has informed us that there is no final judgment in this

case. Ac cordingly, we dismiss th e appeal for want of jurisdic tion
. See Tex. R . App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); Tex. R. Civ. P. 18 a(j )(1)(A); Thay er v. Thayer , Nos. 02

- 14

- 00025

- CV, 02

- 14

- 00026

- CV, 2014 WL 982433, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth Mar. 13, 2014, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op.) (explaining that an order denyi ng a recusal m otion is not

an appealabl e interlocutory order and m ay be reviewed o nly “on appeal from the final judgment” (quoting Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a(j)(1)(A))).3 /s/ Elizabeth Kerr Elizabeth Kerr Justice Delivered: April 21, 2022
§ 32.40-10 Location of crew spaces—T/ALL. ( a ) Crew quarters must not be located farther forward in the vessel than a vertical plane located at 5 percent of the vessel's length abaft the forward side of the stem at the designed summer load water line. However, for vessels in other than ocean or coastwise service, this distance need not exceed 8.5 meters (28 feet). For the purposes of this paragraph, the vessel's length must be as defined in § 43.15-1 of subchapter E (Load Lines) of this chapter. Unless approved by the Commandant, no section of the deck head of the crew spaces may be below the deepest load line.
( b ) There must be no direct communication, except through solid, close fitted doors or hatches between crew spaces and chain lockers, or machinery spaces.
#### § 201.146 Receipt of documents after hearing.

Documents to be submitted for the record after the close of the hearing will not be received in evidence except upon ruling of the presiding officer. Such documents when submitted shall be accompanied by proof that copies have been served upon all parties, who shall have an opportunity to comment thereon; and shall be received not later than ten (10) days after the close of the hearing except for good cause shown, and not less than ten (10) days prior to the date set for filing briefs. Exhibit numbers should be assigned by counsel or the party. In computing the time within which to file such documents or other writings the five (5) additional days provided in § 201.54 shall not apply. Documents which are submitted but do not comply with the provisions of this rule will be filed in the correspondence section of the docket.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Columbia Futures Fund and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       7,486,167
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,496<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,664,223<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,664,223<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              (52,971)<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               406,336
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (459,307)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (459,307)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (459,307)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $29,537 and due from DWR
of $11,959.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $136,560.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $20,606, accrued
management fees of $25,172 and administrative expenses payable
of $87,331.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $(42,366),
net change in unrealized of $(197,728) and interest income of
$187,123.
</FN>


</TABLE>