alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 42.09-15 Surveys by the American Bureau of Shipping or assigning authority. ( a ) *General.* Before issuing a certificate or placement of load line marks on a vessel, the assigning and issuing authority shall make an initial or periodic survey of the vessel as required by this subchapter. A load line survey report shall be made, reflecting information and facts based on initial surveys, including required and special elements as may be deemed necessary by the assigning authority or the Commandant.
( b ) *Initial survey.* An initial survey shall be made before the vessel is put in service or the first time the assigning authority is requested to survey a vessel. The survey shall include a complete examination of its structure and equipment insofar as required by the applicable requirements in this subchapter. This survey shall be such as to ensure that the arrangements, materials, scantlings, and subsequent placement of load line marks fully comply with applicable requirements.
( c ) *Periodical survey.* A periodical survey shall be made at intervals not exceeding five (5) years from an initial or previous periodic survey. The survey shall be similar to the initial survey insofar as extent and purpose are concerned. ( 1 ) If the load line marks are found to be correct for the condition the vessel is then in, the assigning and issuing authority shall issue a new load line certificate, valid for such time as the condition of the vessel then warrants but in no case for a period of longer than 5 years. If, after a survey has been passed, a loadline certificate can not be issued before the current certificate expires, the current certificate may be extended by an endorsement in accordance with the requirements contained in § 42.07-45(d). This endorsement of the assigning authority shall be placed on the back of the certificate, as shown on the forms in subpart 42.50. However, if there have been alterations which affect the vessel's freeboards, such extension shall not be granted. This prohibition is the same as in Article 19(2) of the 1966 Convention.
( 2 ) The periodical survey, including certificate extension or reissue, for a vessel holding an international load line exemption certificate for more than one voyage, shall be the same as for any other vessel covered by this section except for load line marks. However, other conditions specified in the exemption certificate shall be verified.
( d ) *Annual surveys for endorsements.* Vessels subject to initial and periodic surveys shall have annual surveys, within 3 months either way of the certificate's anniversary date. The annual surveys shall be made by and prove satisfactory to the assigning and issuing authority prior to executing the required annual endorsements on load line certificates or exemption certificates. The scope shall be as defined in § 42.09-40 and such as to ensure that the applicable load line marks are found to be correct for the condition the vessel is then in.
[CGFR 68-60, 33 FR 10056, July 12, 1968, as amended by CGFR 68-126, 34 FR 9012, June 5, 1969; CGD 73-49R, 38 FR 12290, May 10, 1973]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending May 20, 2006

|Filer                    | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | End of Comment Period                                
|------------------------ | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|FIFTH THIRD BANK         | * Branch       | Fifth Third Bank, Cincinnati, OH to establish a branch at 790 Gardner Road, Springboro, OH.                                                                                                                                                         | Newspaper:05/09/2006Federal Register:Not applicable  
|Newspaper:               | 05/09/2006    
|Federal Register:        | Not applicable
|Sir Barton Bancorp, Inc. | * 3A1          | Application by Sir Barton Bancorp, Inc., Lexington, KY to form a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of First National Bank of Lexington, Lexington, KY pursuant to Section 3(a)(1) of the Bank Holding Company Act. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:               | Not available 
|Federal Register:        | Not available 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Third Quarter of 2006 (July 1, 2006 - September 30, 2006)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### Hamilton Rose, *as Administrator, etc., Appellant, v.*Helen M. Warren and others, *Respondents*.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 15 (Wednesday, January 24, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3102-3103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-213]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 25

[IB Docket 06-160; DA 07-25]

Processing Applications in the Direct Broadcast Satellite 
Service; Feasibility of Reduced Orbital Spacing for Provision of Direct 
Broadcast Satellite Service in the United States

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of reply comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 18, 2006, the Commission released a Notice of 
Proposed Rulemaking (71 FR 56923, September 28, 2006) (NPRM) in the 
proceeding captioned above. The NPRM seeks comment from the public on 
proposed licensing procedures and service rules for satellites 
providing Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS) service. The NPRM also seeks 
comment on licensing non-nine-degree-spaced DBS applications.
    On December 22, 2006, SES Americom, Inc. filed a Motion for 
Extension of Time, requesting the Commission to extend the reply 
comment filing deadline in this proceeding. SES Americom, Inc. stated 
that an extension would enable the parties to the proceeding to provide 
a more complete record for review, considering the important policy and

[[Page 3103]]

technical issues raised in the proceeding.
    The Commission concurred that the issues raised in the proceeding 
are complex, technical, and of great importance to the DBS service and 
to direct-to-home satellite consumers throughout the United States. 
Thus, the Commission granted SES Americom, Inc.'s request, and extended 
the reply comment pleading deadline to January 25, 2007. The Commission 
stated that the public interest will be served by the extension to 
enable the filing of a more complete record in this proceeding.
    Accordingly, pursuant to section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, 47 
CFR 1.46, the request of SES Americom, Inc. is granted.
    The deadline for filing reply comments in this proceeding is 
extended to January 25, 2007.
    This action is taken under delegated authority pursuant to sections 
0.51 and 0.261 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 0.51, 0.261.

Federal Communications Commission.
Robert G. Nelson,
Chief, Satellite Division, International Bureau.
[FR Doc. 07-213 Filed 1-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NetSolve, Incorporated (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth C. Kieley, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    Kenneth C. KieleyName: Kenneth C. Kieley Title: Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary




February 12, 2004



|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### § 169.507 Responsibility of master.

The master or operator shall ensure that the lifeboats, liferafts, davits, falls, personal flotation devices, and other lifesaving appliances are at all times ready for use, and that all equipment required by the regulations in this subchapter is provided, maintained, serviced, and replaced as indicated.
§ 28.895 Loadlines. ( a ) A fish tender vessel of not more than 500 gross tons, engaged in the Aleutian trade, is not subject to the loadline provisions of 46 U.S.C. Chapter 51 if it is not on a foreign voyage and the vessel: ( 1 ) Operated in this trade before September 8, 1990; or
( 2 ) Was purchased to be used in this trade before September 8, 1990 and entered into service before June 1, 1992; and
( 3 ) Has not undergone a major conversion; and
( 4 ) Has not had a loadline assigned at any time before November 16, 1990.
( b ) The exemption from the loadline provision of 46 U.S.C. Chapter 51 set forth in paragraph (a) of this section expires on January 1, 2003.
§ 3.05-3 Oceanographic research vessel. “An oceanographic research vessel is a vessel which the U.S. Coast Guard finds is employed exclusively in one or more of the following: ( a ) Oceanographic instruction;
( b ) Limnologic instruction;
( c ) Oceanographic research; or,
( d ) Limnologic research.”
# C_2013178EN.01000902.xml

| 22.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/9

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2013 — Masottina v OHIM — Bodegas Cooperativas de Alicante (CA’MARINA)

(Case T-393/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark CA’ MARINA - Earlier Community word mark MARINA ALTA - Relative ground for refusal - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2013/C 178/16

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Masottina SpA (Cornegliano, Italy) (represented by: N. Schaeffer, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Bodegas Cooperativas de Alicante, Coop. V. (Petrel, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action seeking the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 May 2011 (Case R 518/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Bodegas Cooperativas de Alicante, Coop. V. and Masottina SpA.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Masottina SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Masottina SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.

1

---
# C_2008317EN.01000201.xml

| 12.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/2

---

Commission communication on the enquiry and registration under Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) of substances that were lawfully on the market before 1 June 2008 but which do not have phase-in status

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 317/02)

Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) requires that substances that do not fall under the definition of ‘phase-in substance’ that are manufactured or imported into the Community, on their own, in preparations or in articles, in quantities of one tonne or more per year are registered as from 1 June 2008 in accordance with Article 10 of the REACH Regulation.

Prior to the registration of non phase-in substances, an enquiry to the European Chemicals Agency — as foreseen under Article 26 of the REACH Regulation — is required. It is noted that the provisions of the REACH Regulation governing the enquiry process entered into force on 1 June 2008. It follows that it was impossible in practice for a non phase-in substance to be registered on 1 June 2008. In addition, it is also noted that the regulation containing the test methods for use under REACH, in accordance with Article 13(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, was only adopted on 30 May 2008.

Some substances that have been lawfully manufactured and/or placed on the market before 1 June 2008 may not qualify as ‘phase-in substances’ under Article 3(20) of the REACH Regulation. To avoid disruptions of trade and manufacturing activities regarding such substances, and provided that it is demonstrated that the substance was legally on the Community market before 1 June 2008, potential registrants are reminded of the obligation to submit an enquiry to the European Chemicals Agency. For any specific information item missing, the registrant will provide a justification. The missing information will be submitted without undue delay.

---
Exhibit 99.1

               Statement Furnished Pursuant to Section 906 of the
               Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

      The undersigned, Andrew Gordon is the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Coffee Holding Co., Inc. (the "Company").

      This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
October 31, 2002 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that:

            A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

            B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that
this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended.

      Dated: February 12, 2003                  /s/ Andrew Gordon
                                                ---------------------------
                                                Andrew Gordon
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 78 (Tuesday, April 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2039]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Cellular and Inflammatory 
Anaphylaxis Pathways.
    Date: May 22, 2007.
    Time: 11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, Room 3118, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sujata Vijh, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-0985, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#087e6162607b48666169616c26666160266f677e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5026393a3823103e393139347e3e39387e373f26">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 18, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2039 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of the Executors, etc., of MARY H. VERPLANCK, Deceased.

*Final accounting*— *the surrogate may construe the provisions of a*will, *so far as may be necessary to enable him to make a proper decree for the distribution of the estate.*

Appeal from a decree of the surrogate of Dutchess county, made on the final settlement of the accounts of the executors of Mary H. Verplanck, deceased.

The court at General Term said: “I am of opinion that the surrogate had jurisdiction to pass on the validity and interpretation of the various provisions of the will, so far as was necessary to make a proper decree of distribution. Otherwise, it is plain that any party in interest, by raising a controversy, could prevent a distribution of the estate by the surrogate. I cannot find that such power has ever been denied. In *Grill*v. *Brouwer*(47 N. Y., 549), the' Court of Appeals, upon an appeal from a surrogate’s decree of *610distribution, passed upon the question whether a legacy under the terins of the will had lapsed. In *Orton*v. *Orton*(3 ICeyes, 486), on a similar appeal, it was determined whether, under the terms of the will, a legacy to the widow abated ratably with other legacies. On a like appeal in *Ferrer*v. *Pyne*(81 N. Y., 281), a question, identical with the one involved in this case, was determined.

“ If there had been any doubt in the minds either of the profession or the court concerning the jurisdiction of the surrogate in this matter, I think the point would have been made in some of the cases- cited.”

*George■ IP*Forster, for the executors.

*Malcolm G'amgjbell,*for J. H. Hobart.

*S. A.*Brewster, for Mary 0. Hobart.

*Henry He Forest Weelces,*for Mary H. Hare, Elizabeth C. Hare, Chandler Hare and others.

Opinion by

Cullen, J.

Present — Barnard, P: J., Hykman and Cullen, JJ.

Decree of surrogate modified according to opinion.- Order to be settled by Cullen, J.
§ 31.05-1 Issuance of certificate of inspection—TB/ALL. ( a ) When a tank vessel is found to comply with all applicable regulations, including the applicable provisions of subchapters E, F, J, O, Q, S, and W of this chapter and of 33 CFR parts 104, 155, and 157, the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection will issue a certificate of inspection to the vessel or to its owners.
( b ) Certificates of inspection for tank vessels shall be similar in form to certificates issued to other cargo vessels, and in addition to the manning requirements and waters over which they may be operated, they shall be appropriately endorsed *Inspected and approved for the carriage of flammable or combustible liquids of Grade A, B, C, D, or E* (as the case may be), and such endorsement shall serve as a permit for such vessel to operate. The endorsement for the carriage of liquefied flammable gases is set forth in § 38.01-5 of this subchapter.
( c ) The certificate of inspection shall be delivered to the master or owner of the tank vessel to which it relates.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16662, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGD 73-96, 42 FR 49024, Sept. 26, 1977; CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51006, Nov. 4, 1983; CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25286, May 20, 1996; USCG-2003-14749, 68 FR 39314, July 1, 2003]