alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

L. TUCKER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

KANDULSKI, ET AL.,

Defendants. 

 /

Case No. 15-cv-11117 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

PATRICIA T. MORRIS

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [20] AS MOOT

On September 28, 2015, Plaintiff L. Tucker filed a Motion for Reconsideration [20] as to 

the Court’s Order Accepting and Adopting Report and Recommendations [16]. Plaintiff argues 

that he has proof of timely mailing of his Objection to Report and Recommendation [18], filed 

twelve days after the deadline for submission. Dkt. No. 20 at ¶ 4.1

 

Plaintiff’s motion has been rendered moot by the Court’s thoroughly consideration of 

Plaintiff’s Objection to Report and Recommendation [18] in its Opinion and Amended Order 

Accepting and Adopting Report and Recommendations [19], published prior to receipt of 

Plaintiff’s motion on September 28, 2015. 

 

1

 Plaintiff cites to Exhibits A–D; however, no exhibits were attached to the motion the Court received. The same day 

his Motion for Reconsideration was filed, he also filed a second Objection to Report and Recommendation [21], 

which has “Ex-A” written in the bottom margins. This second document was unable to be considered by the Court 

due to the poor quality of the original and illegibility. 

2:15-cv-11117-GAD-PTM Doc # 22 Filed 09/29/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 194
-2-

Accordingly, for the reasons discussed, the Court HEREBY DENIES Defendant’s 

Motion for Reconsideration [20] as MOOT. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 29, 2015 

 /s/Gershwin A Drain 

 HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN 

 United States District Court Judge

2:15-cv-11117-GAD-PTM Doc # 22 Filed 09/29/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 195
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection
with the quarterly report of TorreyPines Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Craig Johnson, Vice President,
Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 1.
  the Report
  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
  the
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Craig JohnsonCraig JohnsonVice
  President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary November 9,
2006 A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

EX-11
          2
             STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

ICY SPLASH FOOD AND BEVERAGE, INC.

STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
              (UNAUDITED)

                                          THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,      SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,

                                          2001             2000             2001              2000
                                      -----------       -----------      -----------       -----------

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Net profit (loss)                     $     2,473       $    (5,223)      $  (17,176)      $  (32,422)
                                      -----------       -----------      -----------      -----------

Weighted average shares outstanding     6,600,000         6,600,000        6,600,000        6,600,000
                                      -----------       -----------      -----------      -----------

Basic earnings per share              $      --         $      --        $      --        $      --
                                      ===========       ===========      ===========      ===========
Diluted earnings per share:

Net profit (loss)                     $     2,473       $    (5,223)      $  (17,176)      $  (32,422)
                                      -----------       -----------      -----------      -----------
Weighted average and dilutive shares:
 Weighted average shares outstanding    6,600,000         6,600,000        6,600,000        6,600,000
 Dilutive shares
  (Antidilutive in 2001 & 2000)              --                --               --               --
                                      -----------       -----------      -----------      -----------
                                        6,600,000         6,600,000        6,600,000        6,600,000
                                      -----------       -----------      -----------      -----------

Diluted earnings per share            $      --         $      --        $      --        $      --
                                      ===========       ===========      ===========      ===========

10
```
EXHIBIT 99.14
 CONSENT OF EXPERT
   (a)
    
    under the headings The Nuclear Business  Reserves and Resources, The Nuclear
Business  Mining Properties  Inkai, and Interest of Experts in the Corporations
Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2008 dated March 31, 2010 for
the Inkai property; and(b)
    
    under the headings Our Mineral Reserves and Resources  Mineral Reserves and
Resources and Qualified Persons in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation for the year ended December 31, 2008 dated February
23, 2010 for the Inkai property,
    /s/ Charles FoldenauerName:
    
    Charles Foldenauer, P. Eng.Title:
    
    General Deputy Director, Operations, Joint Venture Inkai Limited Liability PartnershipDate:
    
    March 31, 2010
#### § 169.745 Escape hatches and emergency exits.

Each escape hatch and other emergency exit must be marked on both sides using at least 1-inch letters: “EMERGENCY EXIT, KEEP CLEAR”, unless the markings are deemed unnecessary by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
#### HUGO VAN DOVER ESTATES, INCORPORATED, RELATOR, v. JERSEY CITY ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

Submitted October term, 1928

Decided January 3, 1929.

Before Justices Mintuen, Black and Campbell.

Eor the relator, *Aaron Gordon.*

Eor the respondents, *Frank J. Reardon.*

Peb Cubiam.

The application for the writ of *mandamus*is denied and the rule to show cause is discharged.
# C_2012133EN.01001902.xml

| 5.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/19

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 27 February 2012 — Herbert Schaible v Land Baden-Württemberg

(Case C-101/12)

2012/C 133/35

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Stuttgart

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Herbert Schaible

Applicant:

Defendant: Land Baden-Württemberg

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

The questions whether

| (a) | the claimant’s obligation to identify individual animals under Articles 3(1) and 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 21/2004, (1) |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the claimant’s obligation to identify individual animals under Articles 3(1) and 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 21/2004, (1)

1

| (b) | the claimant’s obligation of electronic identification of individual animals under the first subparagraph of Article 9(3) of Regulation (EC) No 21/2004 as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1560/2007, (2) and |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the claimant’s obligation of electronic identification of individual animals under the first subparagraph of Article 9(3) of Regulation (EC) No 21/2004 as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1560/2007, (2) and

2

| (c) | the claimant’s obligation to keep holding register C in accordance with Article 5(1) in conjunction with point B(2) of the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 21/2004 |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the claimant’s obligation to keep holding register C in accordance with Article 5(1) in conjunction with point B(2) of the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 21/2004

are compatible with higher-ranking European Union law and therefore valid are referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 21/2004 of 17 December 2003 establishing a system for the identification and registration of ovine and caprine animals and amending Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 and Directives 92/102/EEC and 64/432/EEC (OJ 2004 L 5, p. 8).

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1560/2007 of 17 December 2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 21/2004 as regards the date of introduction of electronic identification for ovine and caprine animals (OJ 2007 L 340, p. 25).

2

---
§ 380.23 Supervision of records. ( a ) Contractors and others subject to the provisions of this subpart shall designate, through formal action, the official company position by title, the incumbent of which shall be responsible for supervision of its document retention and disposal program. Immediately upon designation of the position, a copy of the formal action and name of the incumbent shall be filed with the Records Officer, Maritime Administration. MARAD will accept written or electronic options (such as facsimile and Internet) for transmission of required information, if practicable.
( b ) The person in charge of the retention and disposal program shall maintain a record of all books, records, and accounts held in storage, and in such form that the items and their location are readily identifiable. A copy of the written, or by electronic options (such as facsimile and Internet), if practicable, notification requesting permission to dispose of any books, records, and accounts, and the original approval from the Administration, as required in § 380.22(b), together with a statement showing date, place and method of disposal will suffice as a record of such disposed items. These retention and disposal records shall be available at all times for inspection by Administration officials and auditors.
[69 FR 61452, Oct. 19, 2004]
Morrison Health Care, Inc.

Exhibit 11 - STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)


                                ------------------------------
                                          Year ended
                                ------------------------------              
                                May 31, 1997      June 1, 1996 
                                                                  
Primary                                                           
Average shares outstanding.....      11,785             11,520        
                                                                  
                                                                  
Net effect of dilutive stock                      
options-based on the treasury 
stock method using average
market price...................          56                204 
                               ------------        -----------                
Total..........................      11,841             11,724        
                               ============        ===========                
Net income.....................     $10,286             $9,280        
                               ============        ===========               
Per share amount...............     $  0.87             $ 0.79         
                               ============        ===========
                   
Fully Diluted                                                     
Average shares outstanding.....      11,785             11,520        
                                                                  
Net effect of dilutive stock                                      
options-based on the treasury                     
stock method using the higher
of period-end or average
market price...................          97                204
                               ------------        -----------                
Total..........................      11,882             11,724    
                               ============        ===========
Net income.....................     $10,286             $9,280        
                               ============        ===========        
Per share amount...............     $  0.87             $ 0.79        
                               ============        ===========
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2016 (the "Form 10-Q") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").



I, Heather D. Brolick, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Issuer, certify that to my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 16, 2016



| | /s/ Heather D. Brolick               
| | -------------------------------------
| | Heather D. Brolick                   
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOHN CORRION,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Defendants.

 /

Case Number: 2:15-CV-11213

HON. VICTORIA A. ROBERTS

OPINION AND ORDER OF SUMMARY DISMISSAL

John Corrion is a state inmate incarcerated at the Oaks Correctional Facility in

Manistee, Michigan. He filed a pro se civil rights complaint challenging the state court’s

administration of the rules governing state court filing fees. Because Plaintiff was

enjoined from filing lawsuits in this Court without first obtaining leave of the presiding

judge, and such leave has not been requested or granted, the Court dismisses the

complaint. 

Plaintiff has been a frequent filer of civil rights complaints. In an Order entered in

a civil rights case filed by Plaintiff, District Judge George Caram Steeh reviewed

Plaintiff’s history of filing frivolous and malicious actions. See “Order Striking

Complaint,” Corrion v. Corrion, No. 12-15484 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 1, 2013). At the time

Judge Steeh summarized Plaintiff’s history, Plaintiff had filed at least twenty-eight

lawsuits in this Court, twenty of which were dismissed either for failure to pay the filing

2:15-cv-11213-VAR-RSW Doc # 4 Filed 04/16/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 55
fee after denial of leave to proceed in forma pauperis, or for bringing an action that was

frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim. Id. at 2. Judge Steeh held Plaintiff “is a

vexatious litigant who will not stop filing these actions absent action of the court” and

ordered Plaintiff barred from filing actions without first seeking leave of the presiding

judge. Id. at 3. Plaintiff failed to request or obtain permission to file this complaint. 

Therefore, Plaintiff is barred from initiating this action and DISMISSES the complaint. 

SO ORDERED. 

S/Victoria A. Roberts

VICTORIA A. ROBERTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: 4/16/2015

2

2:15-cv-11213-VAR-RSW Doc # 4 Filed 04/16/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 56
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: MIDLAND FUNDING LLC,

 

 Relator.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00078-CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

O R D E R

The Court has this day considered the Relator’s motion for emergency stay and concludes 

the motion should be GRANTED. Therefore, the County Court at Law No. 5 is directed to stay 

all proceedings in cause number 2014-CCV-01226, styled Miguel Marquez v. Midland Funding 

LLC (originally styled Midland Funding LLC v. Miguel Marquez), pending disposition of this

original proceeding or further order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of April, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Alex Ferries, Chief Financial Officer of UAGH, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: March 19, 2010  /s/ Alex Ferries Alex Ferries Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to UAGH, Inc. and will be retained by UAGH, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 99.2**
I, O. Kim Goheen, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Cameco Corporation;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report;
4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknessesin internal controls; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.
Date: March 15, 2005                                                                 /s/ O. Kim Goheen   O. Kim Goheen   Senior Vice-President & Chief Financial Officer
#### § 34.13-1 Application—T/ALL.

Steam smothering fire extinguishing systems are not permitted on vessels contracted for on or after January 1, 1962. Previously approved installations may be retained as long as they are maintained in good condition to the satisfaction of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
§ 144.200 Structural standards for an existing vessel. An existing vessel may be deemed by the OCMI, or TPO, to be in compliance with this subpart provided that either: ( a ) The vessel is built, equipped, and maintained to conform to the rules of a recognized classification society appropriate for the intended service and routes, but not classed; or
( b ) The vessel has been both in satisfactory service insofar as structural adequacy is concerned and does not cause the structure of the vessel to be questioned by either the OCMI, or TPO engaged to perform an audit or survey.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

 

CENTRAL ALARM SIGNAL, INC., a 

Michigan corporation, individually and as 

the representative of a class of similarlysituated persons, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

NEW YORK ASSOCIATES INC., 

STEVEN WATSTEIN and JOHN DOES 1-

10, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No: 2:15-CV-10681 

 

Hon. George Caram Steeh 

Magistrate Anthony P. Patti

PLAINTIFF’S CORRECTED NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff, CENTRAL ALARM SIGNAL, 

INC., through its undersigned attorneys, hereby voluntarily dismisses this action without 

prejudice. 

Respectfully submitted, 

CENTRAL ALARM SIGNAL, INC., individually 

and as the representative of a class of similarlysituated persons, 

By: s/Brian J. Wanca 

Brian J. Wanca 

ANDERSON + WANCA 

Brian J. Wanca 

Ryan M. Kelly 

3701 Algonquin Road, Suite 500 

Rolling Meadows, IL 60008 

Telephone: 847-368-1500 

Fax: 847-368-1501 

Case 2:15-cv-10681-GCS-APP ECF No. 17 filed 07/29/15 PageID.141 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on July 29, 2015, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk 

of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to all attorneys 

of record. 

 s/ Brian J. Wanca 

Case 2:15-cv-10681-GCS-APP ECF No. 17 filed 07/29/15 PageID.142 Page 2 of 2
#### David S. Paige, *Appellant, v.*William E. Waring, Respondent.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to abide event. *I*Opinion by

Brady, J.