alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 246 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 246

 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to exempt elementary and 
 secondary schools from the fee imposed on employers filing petitions 
    with respect to non-immigration workers under the H-1B program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2009

   Mr. Gene Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to exempt elementary and 
 secondary schools from the fee imposed on employers filing petitions 
    with respect to non-immigration workers under the H-1B program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM FILING FEES FOR SCHOOLS.

    (a) In General.--Section 214(c)(9)(A) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(c)(9)(A)) is amended by inserting ``an 
employer that is a public or private elementary or secondary school 
and'' after ``(excluding''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply to 
petitions filed under section 214(c)(1) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act on or after such date and before October 1, 2001.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                            DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                     2,026,932
<SECURITIES>                                               8,068,310
<RECEIVABLES>                                                773,512
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  45,513
<INVENTORY>                                                2,054,542
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          14,762,080
<PP&E>                                                     8,581,981
<DEPRECIATION>                                             4,070,057
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            24,196,875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      1,218,298
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                       3,157
<OTHER-SE>                                                22,553,044
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              24,196,875
<SALES>                                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           2,656,259
<CGS>                                                      1,165,293
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             18,562,588
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           1,430,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        (1,033,328)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (14,873,001)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (14,873,001)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (14,873,001)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              (0.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (0.50)
        


</TABLE>
§ 195.30-5 General. ( a ) Each self-contained breathing apparatus must be of the pressure-demand, open-circuit type, approved by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) and by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), and have at a minimum a 30-minute air supply, a full facepiece, and a spare charge.
( b ) All equipment shall be maintained in an operative condition, and it shall be the responsibility of the master and chief engineer to ascertain that a sufficient number of the crew are familiar with the operation of the equipment.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-10628 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

VERSATA SOFTWARE, INC. et al.

 Defendants. 

_________________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO MODIFY THE 

COURT’S JULY 2, 2015, PROTECTIVE ORDER (ECF #29) 

On June 30, 2015, Plaintiff Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) filed an 

emergency motion for a protective order. (See ECF #19.) The Court held a 

hearing on Ford’s motion on July 2, 2015. (See Dkt.) It thereafter issued an order 

granting Ford’s motion in part and denying it in part (the “Order”). (See ECF #25.) 

Among other things, the Order provides: 

If and to the extent Defendant Versata Software, Inc. 

(“Versata”) (or any of its agents) desires to interview any 

individuals not employed by Ford Motor Company 

(“Ford”) who performed work for Ford on matters related 

to this litigation, Versata (or its agents) shall send the 

potential interviewee a letter stating its desire to conduct 

the interview and asking the potential interviewee if he or 

she agrees to be interviewed. Such a letter shall be 

delivered to the potential interviewee not less than four 

business days before any proposed interview. 

2:15-cv-10628-MFL-EAS Doc # 42 Filed 09/02/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 986
2 

(Id. at ¶1, Pg. ID 703-704.) Versata initially accepted the Court’s condition that it 

provide advance notice to a potential interviewee, but it has now filed a motion to 

amend the Order to eliminate that requirement. (See ECF #29.) 

 For the reasons stated in Ford’s response to Versata’s motion (see ECF #37), 

the Court does not believe that the Order should be amended or that the advancenotice requirement should be eliminated. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that Versata’s Motion to Amend (ECF #29) is DENIED. 

       s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: September 2, 2015 

 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on September 2, 2015, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113

2:15-cv-10628-MFL-EAS Doc # 42 Filed 09/02/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 987
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NetSolve, Incorporated (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kenneth C. Kieley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    KENNETH C. KIELEYName:

Kenneth C. KieleyTitle:

Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary




November 14, 2003



|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### § 193.30-1 Application.

Automatic sprinkling systems must comply with Chapter 25 of NFPA 13 (incorporated by reference, see § 193.01-3).

[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48302, July 22, 2016]
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-20780 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

CURTIS SCOTT, 

 Defendant. 

_________________________________/ 

ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING REGARDING 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL (ECF #144) 

Currently pending is Curtis Scott’s Motion for New Trial (the “Motion”). (See 

ECF #144.) Scott’s appointed counsel filed the Motion on February 17, 2017. (See 

id.) The Government responded to the Motion on March 1, 2017. (See ECF #148.) 

Scott then filed his own pro se addendum to the Motion on March 22, 2017. (See 

ECF #162.) The Government then responded to the pro se addendum on May 2, 

2017. (See ECF #167.) 

 In its responses, the Government contends that the Motion and the pro se 

addendum were untimely under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33(b)(2) 

because they were not filed within 14 days after the verdict. (See ECF #148 at Pg. 

ID 2515-22.) However, this Court has the authority to extend the 14-day deadline 

in Rule 33(b)(2) if Scott’s alleged failure to comply with the deadline was because 

of “excusable neglect.” See U.S. v. Munoz, 605 F.3d 359, 367-68 (6th Cir. 2010) 
2 

(citing Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(b)); see also United States v. Arny, 831 F.3d 725, 731 n.3 

(6th Cir. 2016). 

Neither party has addressed whether the Court should extend the deadline and 

excuse Scott’s allegedly late filing of the Motion and pro se addendum because the 

purported tardy filing was the result of excusable neglect. The Court HEREBY 

ORDERS each party to file a supplemental brief that addresses the following issue: 

Whether Scott’s alleged failure to comply with the 

deadline in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33(b)(2) 

was the result of excusable neglect. In their supplemental 

briefs, the parties shall apply the factors stated by the 

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in 

U.S. v. Munoz, 605 F.3d at 368-74. 

The Court attaches a copy of the Munoz decision to this Order to ensure that Scott 

has immediate access to the decision and can begin working on his supplemental 

brief right away. (See Exhibit A.) Both Scott and the Government shall file their 

supplemental briefs by no later than May 26, 2017. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

Dated: May 4, 2017 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 
3 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on May 4, 2017, by electronic means and/or ordinary 

mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113
Submitted on record and brief November 7, 1995,

reversed and remanded January 3, 1996

#### Tyrone W. WATERS, *Appellant, v.*John BUNNELL, Acting Sheriff of Multnomah County, Oregon, *Respondent.*

(950433109; CA A88476)

909 P2d 214

Garrett A. Richardson filed the brief for appellant.

No appearance by respondent.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.

WARREN, P. J.

*379WARREN, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing, *sua sponte,*his petition for a writ of *habeas corpus.*ORS 34.370(6). We review for errors of law, *Bedell v. Schiedler,*307 Or 562, 564, 770 P2d 909 (1989), and reverse and remand.

We assume the truth of all well-pleaded allegations and all reasonable inferences that may be drawn in favor of plaintiff. *Weidner v. Zenon,*124 Or App 314, 862 P2d 550 (1993).

Only one issue that plaintiff raises presents a potentially proper basis for *habeas corpus*relief:

> “I further allege that while in custody at the Multnomah County Jail Facilities officers refused my right to medical care and reinjured my back and refused to comply with doctors orders of no work, lifting, bending, twisting, and lower tier bunk only.”

A condition that exposes an inmate to a serious health hazard justifies *habeas corpus*relief. *Bedell.*Plaintiff alleges that he is under a doctor’s order that restricts his activities and limits him to sleeping on a lower bunk. Plaintiff also alleges that he has a back condition that was£ ‘reinjured. ’ ’ The permissible inferences are that plaintiff has a back injury serious enough that a doctor has prescribed medical treatment by ordering plaintiff to refrain from certain activities; that plaintiffs injury was aggravated because jail officers refused to provide conditions consistent with plaintiffs medical restrictions; and that plaintiff was denied medical care when his condition was aggravated. Liberally construed, plaintiffs petition alleges that he is not receiving prescribed medical care.

In *Voth v. Maass,*120 Or App 574, 852 P2d 969 (1993), we said that the denial of *prescribed*medical treatment triggered *habeas corpus*relief. In *Voth,*we inferred that plaintiffs medical condition constituted an immediate, ongoing and serious health hazard because medical treatment had been prescribed but was denied. 120 Or App at 576. On that ground, we concluded that the denial of plaintiffs prescribed *380treatment warranted immediate judicial scrutiny. *Id.*Therefore, plaintiffs allegations, if proven, may entitle him to *habeas corpus*relief. ORS 34.362(2).

Reversed and remanded.
EXHIBIT 21.1

i2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|                                             |  |               
|-------------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|i2 Technologies Pty Ltd                      |  | Australia     
|i2 Technologies N.V.                         |  | Belgium       
|i2 Technologies (Canada), Inc.               |  | Canada        
|Beijing i2 Technologies Company Ltd.         |  | China         
|i2 Technologies A/S                          |  | Denmark       
|i2 Technologies Finland Oy Ltd.              |  | Finland       
|i2 Technologies SARL                         |  | France        
|Aspect Development Germany GmbH              |  | Germany       
|i2 Technologies, GmbH                        |  | Germany       
|i2 Technologies India Private Limited        |  | India         
|i2 Technologies S.r.l.                       |  | Italy         
|Aspect Development K.K.                      |  | Japan         
|i2 Technologies Japan, Inc.                  |  | Japan         
|i2 Technologies Korea, Ltd.                  |  | Korea         
|i2 Technologies (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd           |  | Malaysia      
|i2 de Mexico S. de R.L.C.V.                  |  | Mexico        
|i2 Technologies (Netherlands) B.V.           |  | Netherlands   
|FreightMatrix.com Europe B.V.                |  | Netherlands   
|i2 Technologies PTE Ltd.                     |  | Singapore     
|MStar SA (Pty) Ltd.                          |  | South Africa  
|i2 Technologies SL                           |  | Spain         
|i2 Technologies (Schweiz) GmbH               |  | Switzerland   
|i2 Technologies Taiwan, Inc.                 |  | Taiwan        
|i2 Technologies Limited                      |  | United Kingdom
|ec-Content, Inc.                             |  | California    
|RightWorks Corporation                       |  | California    
|Aspect Development International, Inc.       |  | Delaware      
|i2 Technologies International Services, Inc. |  | Delaware      
|FreightMatrix.com, Inc.                      |  | Delaware      
|i2 Federal, Inc.                             |  | Delaware      
|i2 Technologies US, Inc.                     |  | Nevada
These pages have been removed as TSCA Confidential Business Information.
Exhibit 21.1

                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF
                              THE YORK GROUP, INC.

             SUBSIDIARY                               STATE OF INCORPORATION
             ----------                               ----------------------
    Colonial Guild, Ltd.                                    West Virginia
    Dixie Vault Company, Inc.                               Alabama
    Dixie Vault Trade Company, Inc.                         Delaware
    Doody Trade Company, Inc.                               Delaware
    Elder Davis Trade Company, Inc.                         Delaware
    Elder Davis, Inc.                                       Indiana
    Gorham Bronze, Ltd.                                     South Carolina
    Oregon Brass Works                                      Oregon
    Sheidow Bronze Corporation                              West Virginia
    T.Y.G. Company, Inc.                                    Delaware
    T.Y.G. Trade Company, Inc.                              Delaware
    T.Y.G. Trade II Company, Inc.                           Delaware
    The Doody Group, Inc.                                   Delaware
    The Williamsburg Companies, Inc.                        West Virginia
    The York Children's Foundation                          Texas
    West Point Casket Company, Inc.                         Delaware
    West Point Trade Company, Inc.                          Delaware
    York Acquisition Corp.                                  Delaware
    York Agency, Inc.                                       Delaware
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Florida Business BancGroup,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Marti J. Warren,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
         of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the
         report.





Date:  August 12, 2003                      By:  /s/ Marti J. Warren
      -------------------------------            -------------------------------
                                                 Marti J. Warren,
                                                   Principal Financial Officer
#### § 177.620 Ventilation of machinery and fuel tank spaces.

In addition to the requirements of this subpart, ventilation systems for spaces containing machinery or fuel tanks must comply with the requirements of part 182 of this chapter.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26392]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2275]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Chronic Care 
Workgroup Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 16th meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Chronic Care Workgroup in accordance with the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.)

DATES: June 5, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW, Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 4090. Please bring photo ID for entry to a 
Federal building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/
chroniccare/

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Workgroup will discuss barriers to 
availability of care in the virtual setting. The meeting will be 
available via Web cast. For additional information, go to: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/chroniccare/cc_instruct.html

    Dated: April 30, 2007.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 07-2275 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
§ 327.25 Contents of a claim. ( a ) A valid claim will contain the following: ( 1 ) Identification of the Maritime Administration as the agency whose act or omission gave rise to the claim;
( 2 ) The full name and mailing address of the claimant. If this mailing address is not claimant's residence, the claimant shall also include residence address;
( 3 ) The date, time, and place of the incident giving rise to the claim;
( 4 ) The amount claimed, in a sum certain, supported by independent evidence of property damage or loss, personal injury, or death, as applicable together with supporting medical records and a HIPPA compliant medical waiver for each treating physician or hospital;
( 5 ) A detailed description of the incident giving rise to the claim and the factual basis upon which it is claimed the Maritime Administration is liable for the claim;
( 6 ) A description of any property damage or loss, including the identity of the owner, if other than the claimant, as applicable;
( 7 ) The nature and extent of the injury, as applicable;
( 8 ) The full name, title, if any, and address of any witness to the incident and a brief statement of the witness' knowledge of the incident;
( 9 ) A description of any insurance carried by the claimant or owner of the property and the status of any insurance claim arising from the incident; and
( 10 ) An agreement by the claimant to accept the total amount claimed in full satisfaction and final settlement of the claim, lien or subrogation claim on the claimed amount, or any assignment of the claim.
( b ) A claimant or duly authorized agent or legal representative must sign in ink a claim and any amendment to that claim. The claim shall include a statement that the information provided is true and correct to the best of the claimant's knowledge, information, and belief. If the person's signature does not include the first name, middle initial, if any, and surname, that information must be included in the claim. A married woman must sign her claim in her given name, *e.g.,* “Mary A. Doe,” rather than “Mrs. John Doe.”