alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Rancho Santa Monica Developments Inc. - Exhibit 10.7





 PROMISSORY NOTE 

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned hereby promises
  to pay to or to the order of Monica Galan-Rios (the "Vendor") of Calle 1st
  de Mayo s/n Manzana 18, Lote 3, Col Nueva Obrera, Coatzacoalcos, Veracruz, Mexico,
  C.P. 96598 on November 29, 2006, the principal sum of $50,000 (US) together
  with interest thereon at the rate of 12% per annum from the date hereof. 

 The undersigned waives presentment, demand, notice, protest
  and notice of dishonour and all other demands and notices in connection with
  the delivery, acceptance, performance, default or enforcement of this Promissory
  Note. 

 The undersigned agrees this Promissory Note may be negotiated,
  assigned, discounted, or pledged by the Vendor and in every case payment will
  be made to the holder of this Promissory Note instead of the Vendor upon notice
  being given by the holder to the undersigned, and no holder of this Promissory
  Note will be affected by the state of accounts between the undersigned and the
  Vendor or by any equities existing between the undersigned and the Vendor and
  will be deemed to be a holder in due course and for the value of the Promissory
  Note held by him. 

 DATED at Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, this 29th
  day of November, 2004. 

	RANCHO SANTA MONICA DEVELOPMENTS INC.
    	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Per: /s/ Graham G. Alexander 	 
	Graham G. Alexander, President
# AVA NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Beverly Eaves Perdue Dee Freeman Governor Secretary December 1, 2011

Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming Regional Administrator U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency Region4 61 ForsythStreet, SW Atlanta, GA 30303-3104
SUBJECf: NCConcurrence with NPL Listing; Holcomb Creosote Co. Yadkinville, YadkinCounty, NC 27055 EPA ID: NCD 024 900 987
Deru· Ms. Fleming,
I run writing inresponse to your requestfor the state ofNorth Carolina's position regarding the proposedlisting ofthe Holcomb Creosote, Co. site onthe National Priorities List (NPL).
The State of North Carolina agrees that the site poses a significant tlu·eat to the publichealth and the env:iJ:onment. Therefore, we supportthe EnvironmentalProtection Agency's efforts to propose this site for inclusionon the NPL.
North Carolina appreciates the EPA's continued assistance to protect the state's public health and the environment. If you have any questions or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact Dexter Matthews, Director of the North Carolina Division ofWaste Management, at (919) 707-8238.

cc: Dexter Matthews, NC DWM Jack Butler, NCDWM Jim Bateson, NCDWM FranklinHill, US EPA Region 4 Cathy Amoroso, US EPA Region 4 1601 Mail Service Cenler, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699·1601 Phone: 919-707-8600 I lnlernel: hllp:/lportal.nC<lenr.org

# N~~hCarolina An Equal Cpportun.:ty\AffirmativaAction Emp!oyef- 50% Recycled\ 10% Post Coosuroor Paper 

# ;vaturallu
§ 28.400 Radar and depth sounding devices. ( a ) Each vessel must be fitted with a general marine radar system for surface navigation with a radar screen mounted at the operating station.
( b ) Each vessel must be fitted with a suitable echo depth sounding device.
§ 31.10-5 Inspection of new tank vessels—TB/ALL. ( a ) *Plans.* Triplicate copies of contract plans and specifications shall be forwarded to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, in whose district the construction will take place, for submission to the Commanding Officer (MSC), Attn: Marine Safety Center, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7430, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7430, for approval, but if the tank vessel is to be classed, such plans and specifications shall first be approved by a recognized classification society. If the plans and specifications are found to be in substantial agreement with the regulations in this chapter, they shall be approved, properly stamped and dated and distributed as follows: One set to owner or builder; one set to Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, of the district in which the vessel is to be built; and one set shall be retained at the Marine Safety Center. If such plans and specifications are not approved, the Marine Safety Center shall notify the owner or builder promptly wherein they fail to comply with the regulations in this chapter. For list of electrical plans see subchapter J (Electrical Engineering) of this chapter. ( 1 ) The plans and specifications shall include the arrangement of the cargo gear. Prior to submission to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, plans and specifications for cargo gear shall be approved by either a recognized classification society or the International Cargo Gear Bureau, Inc., whose home office is located at 321 West 44th Street, New York, NY 10036, on the Internet at *http://www.icgb.com .*
( 2 ) For vessels of 100 meters (328 feet) or more in length contracted for on or after September 7, 1990, a plan must be included which shows how visibility from the navigation bridge will meet the standards contained in § 32.16-1 of this subchapter.
( b ) *Inspection.* During construction, and upon completion of each tank vessel, it shall be inspected by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, to determine whether it has been built in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, and, if so, a certificate of inspection endorsed as a permit for the carriage of flammable or combustible liquids in bulk for the proper grade or grades of cargo shall be issued to the vessel or its owner.
( c ) *Certificate of class may be accepted.* In the event such tank vessel is classed by the American Bureau of Shipping or other recognized classification society, the approved plans and certificates of such society may be accepted by the Coast Guard as evidence of the structural efficiency of the hull and reliability of machinery, except as otherwise provided for by law and the rules and regulations in this subchapter.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16662, Dec. 30, 1965] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 31.10-5, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov*.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMAITON EXTRACTED FROM UB&T
FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,201,438
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,865,926
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                32,415
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 10,465,620
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     26,837,664
<ALLOWANCE>                                  (341,714)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,567,535
<DEPOSITS>                                  36,158,873
<SHORT-TERM>                                   585,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            507,559
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,255,525
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,011,857
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              42,567,535
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,852,882
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              585,383
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                97,641
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,535,906
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,180,678
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,183,030
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,352,876
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   52,250
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              27,668
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,258,086
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                364,215
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     364,215
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   264,242
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .59
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     3.5
<LOANS-NON>                                        206
<LOANS-PAST>                                       348
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   312
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       33
<RECOVERIES>                                        10
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  341
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               341
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            341
        

</TABLE>
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

DAVID PARSONS, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

GC SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 2:15-cv-11446 

STIPULATION FOR FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

AS TO DEFENDANT GC SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 

COMES NOW Plaintiff David Parsons (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant GC Services Limited 

Partnership (“GC Services”) (collectively GC Services, with the Plaintiff, are the “Parties”), by 

and through the undersigned counsel and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), file this Stipulation 

for Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice. By submission of this Stipulation for Final Order 

of Dismissal with Prejudice, the submitting party represents that all parties consent to its entry. 

Pursuant to this stipulation, the Parties stipulate and agree to entry of the Agreed Final Order of 

Dismissal with Prejudice by which: 

1. An agreement for a stipulated dismissal with prejudice has been reached between the 

Parties in the matter styled David Parsons v. GC Services Limited Partnership (Civ. 

Action No. 2:15-cv-11446 (E.D.Mich.). 

2. All of Plaintiff’s claims and causes of action are being dismissed, on the merits, with 

prejudice as to GC Services. 

3. This stipulation and dismissal completely terminates the above-captioned matter 

against all Parties. Each Party will bear its/her own attorneys’ fees, costs and 

expenses. 

2:15-cv-11446-GCS-MKM Doc # 14 Filed 09/10/15 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 31
2 

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, on this 3rd day of 

September, 2015, by and between Plaintiff David Parsons and Defendant GC Services Limited 

Partnership that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, this action be dismissed, on the merits, with 

prejudice, that Plaintiff dismisses his claims against Defendant GC Services Limited Partnership, 

with each party to bear his or its own attorney’s fees, costs and expenses incurred. 

/s/ Ryan Lee 

Ryan Lee 

Krohn & Moss, Ltd 

10474 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 405 

Los Angeles, CA 90025 

Phone: (323) 988-2400 ext. 241 

Fax: (866) 861-1390 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

rlee@consumerlawcenter.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff David Parsons 

/s/ Carlos A. Ortiz 

Carlos A. Ortiz 

cortiz@hinshawlaw.com 

Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP 

222 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 300 

Chicago, IL 60601 

Telephone: (312) 704-3000 

Facsimile: (312) 704-3001 

Attorney for Defendant 

 GC Services Limited Partnership 

 

2:15-cv-11446-GCS-MKM Doc # 14 Filed 09/10/15 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 32
3 

ORDER 

 Based on the stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing therefore, 

 IT IS ORDERED that this action be, and hereby is, DISMISSED, ON THE MERITS, 

WITH PREJUDICE, each side to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees. 

. 

 

SO ORDERED: 

DATE: September 10, 2015 s/George Caram Steeh 

 GEORGE CARAM STEEH 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

1091859/23292056v.1 

2:15-cv-11446-GCS-MKM Doc # 14 Filed 09/10/15 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 33
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-QSB
for the period ended June 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,405
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 7,276
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     11,245
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                          8,075
<ALLOWANCE>                                        130
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,472
<DEPOSITS>                                      16,853
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                213
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,393
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  29,472
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    240
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  167
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   282
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   689
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 223
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 223
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              466
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      106
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    874
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (503)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        (503)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (315)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.24)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.70
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    24
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  130
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               130
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Submitted on petitioner’s motion for reconsideration filed September 20,

reconsideration allowed; opinion (136 Or App 612, 902 P2d 137 (1995)) modified; reversed and remanded for reconsideration February 14, 1996

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Therese L. Petkovich, Claimant. Therese L. PETKOVICH, *Petitioner, v.*SAFEWAY STORES, INC., *Respondent.*

(93-07299; CA A84646)

911 P2d 362

Linda C. Love and Craine & Love for motion.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*155PER CURIAM

Claimant moves for reconsideration of our decision, *Petkovich v. Safeway Stores, Inc.,*136 Or App 612, 902 P2d 137 (1995), contending that we erred in determining that 1995 amendments to ORS 656.726(3)(f)(D) apply to her case. We allow the motion, modify our opinion and reverse and remand for reconsideration.

Claimant is correct that the amendments to ORS 656.726(3)(f)(D) do not apply to her case. *See*1995 Or Laws, ch 332, § 66(4). Thus, we reexamine claimant’s argument that the Workers’ Compensation Board erred in calculating her permanent partial disability award. In calculating claimant’s award, the Board applied OAR 436-35-310(2) (March 13, 1992), which provided that, when a claimant had returned to regular work, the adaptability factor was assigned a value of zero.

Claimant argues that OAR 436-35-310(2) (March 13, 1992) conflicts with ORS 656.726(3)(f)(A) and is invalid. Claimant is correct. *Carroll v. Boise Cascade Corp.,*138 Or App 610, 910 P2d 1111 (1996). Hence the Board erred in calculating claimant’s permanent partial disability award.

Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified. Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.
#### In the Matter of John C. Bray.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
###### Editorial Note on Part 160

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 160.151-25 Additional equipment for inflatable liferafts.

The manufacturer may specify additional equipment to be carried in inflatable liferafts if the equipment is identified in the manufacturer's approved drawings and if the packing and inspection of the equipment is covered in the servicing manual. Any such additional equipment for which performance or approval standards are prescribed in this part or in 47 CFR part 80 must comply with those standards.
EXHIBIT 14.2




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We  hereby  consent  to  the   incorporation  by  reference  in  the
            registration  statement  of Cimatron  Ltd. on Form S-8,  file number
            333-12458 and each  prospectus  constituting a part thereof,  of our
            report  dated  February  24, 2002 with  respect to the  consolidated
            financial  statements of Cimatron  Ltd. for the year ended  December
            31, 2001, which report is included in the Annual Report on Form 20-F
            of Cimatron Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2003.





/s/ ZIV HAFT
  Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
  BDO Member Firm




Tel Aviv, Israel
  June 30, 2004

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 127 (Tuesday, July 2, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 39730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15756]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

[CMS-1459-CN]

Medicare Program; Notification of Closure of Teaching Hospitals 
and Opportunity To Apply for Available Slots; Correction

AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

ACTION: Correction notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a typographical error that appeared in 
the notice published in the Federal Register on May 31, 2013 entitled 
``Notification of Closure of Teaching Hospitals and Opportunity to 
Apply for Available Slots.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Miechal Lefkowitz, (212)-616-2517.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    In FR Doc. 2013-12952 of May 31, 2013 (78 FR 32663), there was a 
typographical error that is identified and corrected in the Correction 
of Errors section below.

II. Summary of Errors

    On pages 32663 and 32664 in the May 31, 2013 Federal Register 
notice, we inadvertently made a typographical error when we misspelled 
the name of the city in which one of the closed teaching hospitals was 
located. Specifically, we stated that Montgomery Hospital was located 
in ``Morristown, PA,'' instead of ``Norristown, PA.''

III. Correction of Errors

    In FR Doc. 2013-12952 of May 31, 2013 (78 FR 32663), make the 
following corrections:
    1. On page 32663, third column, first full paragraph, line 4, the 
location ``Morristown, PA'' is corrected to read, ``Norristown, PA''.
    2. On pages 32663 and 32664, in the table titled ``Teaching 
Hospitals Closure,'' the third column (City and State), line 2, the 
location ``Morris-town, PA'' is corrected to read ``Norristown, PA.''

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.773, 
Medicare--Hospital Insurance; and Program No. 93.774, Medicare--
Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)

    Dated: June 25, 2013.
Jennifer M. Cannistra,
Executive Secretary to the Department, Department of Health and Human 
Services.
[FR Doc. 2013-15756 Filed 7-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
```
§ 294.31 Payments. ( a ) *Amount payable.* A TSP Operating Agreement will provide for each Fleet Vessel, an annual payment, subject to the availability of appropriations, equal to $6,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2022 to 2035. This amount will be paid in equal monthly installments at the end of each month. The annual amount payable will not be reduced except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) *Reductions in amount payable.* The annual amount otherwise payable under a TSP Operating Agreement will be reduced on a pro rata basis for each day less than 320 days in a fiscal year that a Fleet Vessel is not operated in accordance with § 294.23(a)(1) through (3).
( c ) *No payment.* ( 1 ) Regardless of whether the Agreement Holder has or will operate the Fleet vessel for 320 days a year, the Agreement Holder will not be paid: ( i ) For any day in which the TSP Vessel is engaged in transporting more than 7,500 tons of civilian bulk preference cargoes pursuant to 46 U.S.C. 55302(a), 55305, or 55314 (using the United States standard of short tons, which is equivalent to 6,803.85 metric tons or 6,696.75 long tons);
( ii ) During a period in which the Agreement Holder participates in noncontiguous domestic trade, unless that Agreement Holder is a Section 50501 Citizen, applying the 75 percent ownership requirement of that Section;
( iii ) For any days in which the Agreement Holder operates a TSP Vessel that is 15 years or older which is not enrolled in their classification society's CAP or is not maintaining a CAP rating of 2 or better;
( iv ) For any day in which the Agreement Holder operates a TSP Vessel that is in excess of 20 years of age;
( v ) For days in excess of 30 days in a fiscal year in which a vessel is drydocked or undergoing survey, inspection, or repair, unless, prior to the expiration of the vessel's 30-day drydock and repair period, the Agreement Holder obtains approval from MARAD for an extension beyond 30 days;
( vi ) For any day in which the Agreement Holder does not, at the request of the Administrator, carry up to two United States Merchant Marine Academy cadets onboard; and
( vii ) If the Agreement Holder does not operate or maintain the Fleet Vessel in accordance with the terms of the TSP Operating Agreement.
( 2 ) To the extent that non-payment days under paragraph (c) of this section are known, Agreement Holder payments will be reduced at the time of the current billing. The daily reduction amounts will be based on the annual amounts in paragraph (a) of this section divided by 365 days (366 days in leap years) and rounded to the nearest cent.
( 3 ) MARAD may require, for good cause, that a portion of the funds payable under this section be withheld if the provisions of § 294.23(a) have not been met.
( 4 ) Amounts owed to MARAD for reductions applicable to a prior billing period must be electronically transferred using MARAD's prescribed format, or the amount owed can be credited to MARAD by offsetting amounts payable in future billing periods.