alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 6047

WAKEEL ABDUL

- SABUR , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Glen E. Conrad, Senior District Judge. ( 7:20

- cv - 00501

- GEC

- PMS )

Submitted : May 25, 2021 Decided: May 28, 2021

Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Wakeel Abdul

- Sabur , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Wakeel Abdul

- Sabu r appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he sought to challenge his 46

- month sentence for mailing a threatening communication, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 876, by way of the savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255

. Pursuant to § 2255(e), a prisoner may challenge his sentence in a traditional writ of habeas corpus pursuant to § 2241 if a § 2255 motion would be inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention. [Section] 2255 is inadequate and ineffect ive to test the legality of a sentence when: (1) at the time of sentencing, settled law of this circuit or the Supreme Court established the legality of the sentence; (2) subsequent to the prisoner’s direct appeal and first § 2255 motion, the aforementione d settled substantive law changed and was deemed to apply retroactively on collateral review; (3) the prisoner is unable to meet the gatekeeping provisions of § 2255(h)(2) for second or successive motions; and (4) due to this retroactive change, the senten ce now presents an error sufficiently grave to be deemed a fundamental defect.
United States v. Wheeler , 886 F.3d 415, 429 (4th Cir. 2018).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Abdul

- Sabur’s motion for summary disposition and affirm the district court’s dismissal of the § 2241 petition

. Abdul

- Sabur v. United States , No. 7:20

- cv - 00501

- GEC

- PMS (W.D. Va . Dec. 22, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case 2:15-cv-12309-SFC-RSW ECF No. 4, PageID.100 Filed 07/21/15 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:15-cv-12309-SFC-RSW ECF No. 4, PageID.101 Filed 07/21/15 Page 2 of 2
#### § 184.704 Marine sanitation devices.

A vessel with installed toilet facilities must have a marine sanitation device that complies with 33 CFR part 159.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 3.2.1
FORM NO. 7a                                         Registration No. EC 12558






                                     BERMUDA



                            CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT OF
                     MEMORANDUM OF INCREASE OF SHARE CAPITAL


        THIS IS TO CERTIFY that a Memorandum of Increase of Share Capital
                                       of

                        LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS LTD.

   was delivered to the Registrar of Companies on the 27th day of May, 1997 in

      accordance with section 45(3) of the Companies Act 1981 ("the Act").



                                                 Given under my hand this 29th

                                                 day of May, 1997




                                                 for Registrar of Companies


Capital prior to increase: US$9,007,500.00

Amount of increase:        US$   200,000.00

Present Capital:           US$9,207,500.00
#### The President, etc., of the Delaware and Hudson Canal Company, *Appellant, v.*Liflet Harris, *Respondent*.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Landon, J.;

Learned, P. J., not acting.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending July 8, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.13    
    


 
 

IHS INC.
  2004 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN    
    
    2004 RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD    
    


        Unless defined in this Restricted Stock Award (this "Award Document"), capitalized terms will have the same
meanings ascribed to them in the IHS Inc. 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as may be amended from time to time, the "Plan"). 



        Pursuant
to Section 8 of the Plan, you have been granted restricted Shares on the following terms and subject to the provisions of the Plan, which is incorporated by reference. In
the event of a conflict between the provisions of the Plan and this Award Document, the provisions of the Plan will prevail. 



	Participant:	 	Jerre Stead
	

Total Number of Shares Granted:	
 	

200,000 Shares
	

Fair Market Value per Share:	
 	

$8.61 per Share
	

Total Fair Market Value of Award:	
 	

$1,722,000
	

Grant Date:	
 	

December 23, 2004
	

Vesting Schedule:	
 	

1/3rd will vest on November 30, 2005, another 1/3rd will vest on November 30, 2006 and the last 1/3rd will vest on
November 30, 2007; provided, however, that in the event of a Change in Control, this Award shall vest in full and be free of restrictions, and you will participate in the acquisition to the extent
of and in the same manner as all other stockholders of the Company; and provided further that in the event of your death or termination of employment due to your Disability (as defined in Exhibit A attached), this Award shall vest in full and be free of restrictions.





        By
your signature and the signature of the Company's representative below, you and the Company agree that these Shares are granted under and governed by the terms and conditions of the
Plan and the terms and conditions set forth in the attached as Exhibit A. 



	
RECIPIENT	
 	

 	
 	
IHS INC.
	

/s/  JERRE L. STEAD      
	
 	

 	
 	

By:	

/s/  S. AUXER      

	Jerre L. Stead
 Print Name	 	 	 	Title:	Senior Vice President IHS Inc.














QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.13


IHS INC. 2004 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN 2004 RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD
EXHIBIT 99(b)

       CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection with the Annual Report of Lexington B&L Financial Corp. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"), I, William J.
Huhmann, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Sec.1350,  as  added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company  as  of  and  for  the  period covered by the Report.


                                              /s/ William  J. Huhmann
                                              -----------------------
Date:  November 27, 2002                           William J. Huhmann
                                                   President and Chief Financial
Officer


<PAGE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending April 28, 2007

|Filer             | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|MANHATTAN BANCORP | * 3A1         | Manhattan Bancorp to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Bank of Manhattan, N.A. (In Organization), both of El Segundo, California. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:05/21/2007
|Newspaper:        | Not available
|Federal Register: | 05/21/2007   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 32



Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Relating to a Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements



I, William J. Reuter, Chief Executive Officer, and Drew K. Hostetter, Chief Financial Officer, of Susquehanna Bancshares, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that, based on my knowledge:



(1) The Companys periodic report containing financial statements on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 9, 2004    |  |  |  |                        
|                        |  | 
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |  |  |  | CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
|                        |  | 
|/s/ William J. Reuter   |  |  |  | /s/ Drew K. Hostetter  
|William J. Reuter       |  |  |  | Drew K. Hostetter
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-0599 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NE-19-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update 

accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspect LPT shaft 

and CVT Support 

Assy.

8.0 $ 680.00 $ 680.00 71 $48,280.00

Replace CVT 

Support Assy.

$ 0.00 $3,080 $3,080.00 71 $218,680.00

Replace LPT shaft $ 0.00 $126,900 $126,900.00 2 $253,800.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $520,760

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated 

Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty 

costs):

Note 1: Assumes 50% of 359 suspect disks are still in service; also assumes 50% of 180 

disks in active service are in US engines; therefore, approximately 90 disks will require 

FPI and EC inspections and an average of one disk will be rejected and will require a

replacement 
Note 2: Assumes an average of two re-inspections by FPI and EC before the disk is 

retired. One disk will be removed from service for the entire re-inspection cycle of 89 

and 88 engines respectively. 

Note 3: Cost does not include engine disassembly, inspection, and consumables incurred 

during normal periodic hot section engine inspection. Cost does not include consumables 

during unscheduled engine removals.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain

for either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements 

for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
December 11, 2012

MEMORANDUM

From: William H. Maxwell EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01)

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234

Subject: Meeting with Environmenta l Integrity Project (EIP)

Attendees :

Eric Schaeffer, Environmental Integrity Project Whitney Ferrell, Environmental Integrity Project William Maxwell, EPA Paul Versace, EPA

Discussion :

A general discussion was held regarding clarifying questions from Environmental Integrity Project on the proposed Mercury and Air Toxics Sta ndards (MATS) reconsideration issues.
|List of Foreign Margin Stocks
The Board publishes the *List of Foreign Margin Stocks* on a semiannually basis, provided the composition of the List has changed during the previous six months (see March 3, 2004, press release).The List of Foreign Margin Stocks consists of foreign equity securities that have met the eligibility criteria of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System under its Regulation T and are thus  eligible for margin treatment at brokers and dealers on the same basis as domestic margin securities. Additional foreign equity securities are also eligible for margin treatment (see About).Notice
It is unlawful for any person to cause any representation to be made that inclusion of a security on the List of Foreign Margin Stocks indicates that the Board or the Securities and Exchange Commission has in any way approved such security or transaction therein.  Also, any reference to the Board in connection with the List of Foreign Margin Stocks or any securities thereon in an advertisement or similar communication is unlawful.March 3, 2004, press release | September 15, 2003, list |
About
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|HomeAccessibility |
Contact UsLast update: June 21, 2016
EX-10.3






EXHIBIT 10.3




NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION




Base Salaries



Effective January 1, 2005, the independent members of the Company’s Board of Directors approved
increases to the annual base salaries for the following named executive officers of the Company as
follows:



	 	 	 	 	 
	Bobby S. Shackouls
	 	$	1,025,000	 
	Randy L. Limbacher
	 	$	550,000	 
	Steven J. Shapiro
	 	$	550,000	 







L. David Hanower $ 450,000



2001 Performance Share Unit Plan



Effective January 25, 2005, the Compensation Committee vested the below listed number of
performance share units previously granted to the following named executive officers of the Company
resulting in the below listed payouts:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Named Executive Officer	 	Number of Units Vested	 	Payout
	Bobby S. Shackouls
	 	 	200,000	 	 	$	8,632,000	 
	Randy L. Limbacher
	 	 	62,500	 	 	$	2,697,500	 
	Steven J. Shapiro
	 	 	62,500	 	 	$	2,697,500	 
	L. David Hanower
	 	 	50,000	 	 	$	2,158,000	 
	John A. Williams
	 	 	50,000	 	 	$	2,158,000	 







2005 Performance Share Unit Plan



Effective January 26, 2005, the Compensation Committee granted the below listed number of
performance share units to the following named executive officers of the Company:



	 	 	 	 	 
	Named Executive Officer	 	Number of Units Granted
	Bobby S. Shackouls
	 	 	200,000	 
	Randy L. Limbacher
	 	 	70,000	 
	Steven J. Shapiro
	 	 	70,000	 
	L. David Hanower
	 	 	55,000	 
	John A. Williams
	 	 	55,000
Exhibit 32.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Octillion Corp. (the Company) on the Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harmel S. Rayat, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(i)

the Report filed by the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)

The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                       |  |                 |  |                                        
|---------------------- |  | --------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|                       |  | OCTILLION CORP.
|                       |  |                 |  |                                        
|Date:  January 9, 2008 |  | By:             |  | /s/ Harmel S. Rayat                    
|                       |  |                 |  | Harmel S. Rayat
Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 31.01-1 Inspections required—TB/ALL, preemptive effect. ( a ) Every tank vessel subject to the regulations in this subchapter shall be inspected every 5 years or more often, if necessary, by the Coast Guard to see that the hull, boilers, machinery, equipment, apparatus for storage, and appliances of the vessel comply with marine inspection laws, and the regulations in this subchapter, and when applicable, subchapters E, F, J, O, Q, S, and W of this chapter and 33 CFR parts 155 and 157.
( b ) Tank vessels which are laid up, dismantled, and out of commission are exempt from inspections required by law or regulations in this subchapter, provided that such vessels are cleaned of all cargo residue and maintained in a gas free condition.
( c ) For inspection and tests of tanks containing certain dangerous cargoes in bulk, see part 98 and subchapter O of this chapter.
( d ) The regulations in this part have preemptive effect over State or local regulations in the same field.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16662, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGFR 70-10, 35 FR 3709, Feb. 25, 1970; CGD 80-009, 48 FR 36458, Aug. 11, 1983; CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51006, Nov. 4, 1983; CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25286, May 20, 1996; CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51043, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-1999-4976, 65 FR 6499, Feb. 9, 2000; USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33872, June 7, 2012]