alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2

                                  Certification
                       Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of  Highlands  Bankshares,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the period  ending  December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
James T. Riffe, Chief Operations Officer of the Company,  certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         3.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         4.       The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/S/ James. T. Riffe
---------------------------
James T. Riffe
Chief Operations Officer
March 26, 2003


This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  Sec.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

[A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Highlands  Bankshares,  Inc.  and will be  retained  by  Highlands
Bankshares,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.]
NEW YORK SUPERIOR COURT.

#### Theodore Schmalholz agt. Gustavus Polhaus and Wife.

*General Term,*

*January,*1875.

*Appearance, when confers jurisdiction—parties in foreclosure case.*

Appearance by attorney is equivalent to personal service in the county in conferring jurisdiction upon this court.

Where the mortgagor of real estate has"parted with the equity of redemption in the mortgaged premises, he is not a proper party to a motion by the purchaser at the foreclosure sale, to set aside the sale for defect of ' title.

Neither is’ the mortgagor’s wife, who never executed the mortgage—the sale being made expressly subject to her inchoate right of dower — a proper party to such motion.

Appeal from a decision on a motion by plaintiff, as purchaser at a foreclosure sale, to set aside the sale for. defect of title.

Monell, *C. J*.

None of the objections to the title are sound.

The jurisdiction” of this court cannot be questioned. Its' general equity jurisdiction, under the provisions of the Code, was fully established in *Forrest*agt. *Forrest*(25 *N. Y. R.,*501), and in actions for the foreclosure of a mortgage, by the express terms of section 33 of the Code. In all eases it has jurisdiction when the party is served in the county. An appearance by attorney is equivalent to personal service *(Rule*14; *Schwinger*agt. *Hickox,*46 *How. Pr. R.,*114). The mortgagor having parted with the equity of redemp*60tion, had no interest which rendered it necessary that he should be made a party *(Denny*agt. *Clark,*16 *How. Pr. R.,*424; *Van Nest*agt. *Latson,*19 *Barb.,*604).

The mortgagor’s wife not having executed the mortgage could not be divested of her inchoate right of dower, and she was not, therefore, a necessary party to this motion.

Besides, the sale was expressly subject to such dower right. The pendency of the action to set aside the deed to Polhaus is not an objection which the purchaser can raise. That deed released the dower right of the mortgagor’s wife, and she is seeking to avoid it. The purchaser, however, had notice, at the time of sale, of the existence of such dower claim, and in express terms purchased subject to it.

The plaintiff may have an order for a resale of' the property. The sum deposited with the referee on the former sale cannot be ordered to be paid'to the plaintiff. It must abide the result of the sale under this order.

As another sale could have been had, under the terms of sale, this motion was not necessary.

Besides, the plaintiff could have applied for an order to compel the purchaser to complete the purchase.

The plaintiff, therefore, not to have costs of this motion.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

# AGENCY:

U.S. Geological Survey, Department of the Interior.

# ACTION:

Estaablishment of a Federal Advisory Committee. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice is published in accordance with Section 9(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (Pub. L. 92-643). Following consultation with the General Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the Secretary of the Interior has established the Advisory Committee for the United States Geological Survey—Climate Change Science Program for Synthesis and Assessment Product 4.2—Thresholds of Climate Change. The Climate Change Science Program (CCSP), a consortium of Federal agencies performing climate science, has established a synthesis and assessment (S&A) program as a part of its Strategic Plan. There are 21 S&A products to be administered by 13 Federal agencies over a 5-year period. The U.S. Geological Survey, a participant in the CCSP, is responsible for three S&A products. S&A product 4.2: Thresholds of Climate Change is the subject of this Federal Advisory Committee.

The primary function of the Committee is to synthesize and assess the state of knowledge on the topic of thresholds of climate change and communicate this information to the U.S. Geological Survey. Committee members will meet and discuss issues relating to the study design, research methodology, data sources and quality, and study findings. The Committee will draft a report that will serve as the CCSP definitive document on current knowledge pertaining to the topic of thresholds of climate change. Membership will consist of Federal and non-Federal scientists who are recognized as experts in the climate science community.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Colleen W. Charles, U.S. Geological Survey, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, MS 301, Reston, Virginia 20192; 703-648-4110.                         *colleen_charles@usgs.gov.*

Dated: May 1, 2007.

Dick Kempthorne, 

Secretary of the Interior.

[FR Doc. 07-2327 Filed 5-10-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4311-AM-M
#### § 201.55 Postponement of hearing.

Applications for postponement of any hearing date may be granted upon a showing of good cause on the part of the applicant. Answers to such applications are permitted.
Exhibit 10.4

 

TREBIA ACQUISITION CORP.

41 Madison Avenue, Suite 2020

New York, NY 10010

June 12, 2020

 

BGPT Trebia LP

41 Madison Avenue, Suite 2020

New York, NY 10010

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

This letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”)  of the registration statement (the “Registration Statement”)  for the initial public offering (the “IPO”)  of the securities of Trebia Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”)  and continuing until the earlier of (i) the completion by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”), BGPT Trebia LP shall take steps directly or indirectly to make available to the Company certain office space, secretarial and administrative services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 41 Madison Avenue, Suite 2020, New York, NY 10010 (or any successor location). In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay BGPT Trebia LP a sum of $10,000 per month, respectively, on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. BGPT Trebia LP hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) that may be established upon the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.

 


	
 
    	
 
    	
Very truly yours,
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
TREBIA ACQUISITION   CORP.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Tanmay   Kumar
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Tanmay Kumar
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Chief Financial Officer
    
	
AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
BGPT   TREBIA LP
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
Bridgeport Partners GP LLC, its general partner
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   Frank R. Martire, Jr.
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
Frank R. Martire, Jr.
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
Member
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   Frank Martire, III
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
Frank Martire, III
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
Member
#### John W. Stebbins, *as Assignee, etc., Appellant, v.*The Howe Machine Company, *Respondent.*

Judgment affirmed on the opinion of the late

Judge Gardner as referee.

Dwight, J., not sitting.
Submitted on record and briefs August 25,

affirmed December 27, 1995,

petition for review denied May 28, 1996 (323 Or 265)

#### CITY OF EUGENE, OREGON, *Respondent, v.*1979 280ZX, DATSUN, Oregon License No. TCL 860, VIN No. HGS130122481, *Defendant in rem, and*ROBERT HASH, *Appellant.*

(16-93-05896; CA A87776)

908 P2d 849

Robert Hash, *pro se,*filed the briefs for appellant.

F. Douglas Harcleroad, District Attorney, and Melinda C. Broome, Assistant District Attorney, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Hasel-ton, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*372PER CURIAM

Appellant’s property was forfeited in a proceeding that followed his criminal conviction. At the forfeiture proceeding, he claimed that the forfeiture was unconstitutional as an excessive fine/punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. *Austin v. United States,*509 US_, 113 S Ct 2801, 125 L Ed 2d 488 (1993). On appeal, he has abandoned that argument. Instead, he argues that the forfeiture proceeding violated the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy and relies on, *inter alia, U.S. v. $405,089.23 U.S. Currency,*33 F3d 1210 (9th Cir 1994). Appellant did not make that argument to the trial court, and we will not consider it for the first time on appeal.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 22 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 22

To amend chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, to allow the United 
States Postal Service to pay its share of contributions for annuitants' 
health benefits out of the Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2009

   Mr. McHugh (for himself and Mr. Davis of Illinois) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, to allow the United 
States Postal Service to pay its share of contributions for annuitants' 
health benefits out of the Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GOVERNMENT CONTRIBUTIONS FOR POSTAL ANNUITANTS' HEALTH 
              BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Section 8906(g)(2)(A) of title 5, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``shall through September 30, 2016, be 
paid by the United States Postal Service, and thereafter''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall be 
effective as of October 1, 2008.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 201.163 Request for extension of time for filing exceptions and replies thereto.

Requests for extension of time within which to file exceptions, and briefs in support thereof, or replies to exceptions shall conform to the applicable provisions of subpart E of this part. Except for good cause shown, such requests shall be filed and served not later than five (5) days before the expiration of the time fixed for the filing of such documents.
§ 27.201 What are the requirements for general alarms on towing vessels? ( a ) You must ensure that your vessel is fitted with a general alarm that: ( 1 ) Has a contact-maker at the operating station that can notify persons on board in the event of an emergency.
( 2 ) Is capable of notifying persons in any accommodation, work space, and the engine room.
( 3 ) Has installed, in the engine room and any other area where background noise makes a general alarm hard to hear, a supplemental flashing red light that is identified with a sign that reads: Attention General Alarm—When Alarm Sounds or Flashes Go to Your Station.
( 4 ) Is tested at least once each week.
( b ) You or the operator may use a public-address (PA) system or other means of alerting all persons on your towing vessel instead of a general alarm, if the system— ( 1 ) Is capable of notifying persons in any accommodation, work space, and the engine room;
( 2 ) Is tested at least once each week;
( 3 ) Can be activated from the operating station; and
( 4 ) Complies with paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 5 (Tuesday, January 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-25]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records

AGENCY: Defense Intelligence Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to Delete Systems of Records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Intelligence Agency is deleting five systems of 
records notices in its existing inventory of record systems subject to 
the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
February 8, 2007 unless comments are received that would result in a 
contrary determination.

ADDRESSES: Freedom of Information Office, Defense Intelligence Agency 
(DAN-1A), 200 MacDill Boulevard, Washington, DC 20340-5100.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Theresa Lowery at (202) 231-1193.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Intelligence Agency notices for 
systems of records subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), 
as amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are 
available from the address above.
    The specific deletions are set forth below. The proposed deletions 
are not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 
(5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or 
altered system report.

    Dated: January 3, 2007.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
Deletion
LDIA 0005

System name:
    Personnel Management Information System (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 
10613).
    Reason: The records contained in this system of records have been 
migrated into Defense Intelligence Agency's LDIA 05-0001, Human 
Resources Management System (HRMS).
LDIA 0015

System name:
    Biographic Sketch (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10613).
    Reason: Information no longer collected or maintained. Records have 
been destroyed.
LDIA

System name:
    Official Traveler Profile (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10613).
    Reason: Defense Intelligence Agency maintains these records under a 
Government-wide Privacy Act system of records notice, GSA/GOVT-4, 
Contracted Travel Services Program published in the Federal Register on 
December 20, 2004, at 69 FR 75980.
LDIA 0590

System name:
    Defense Intelligence Special Career Automated System (DISCAS) 
(February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10613).
    Reason: The records are maintained in Defense Intelligence Agency's 
LDIA 05-0001, Human Resources Management System (HRMS) published in the 
Federal Register on November 25, 2005 at 70 FR 71099.
LDIA 0813

System name:
    Bibliographic Data Index (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10613).
    Reason: Information no longer collected or maintained. Records have 
been destroyed and the permanent records were retired to the Washington 
National Records Center.

[FR Doc. 07-25 Filed 1-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 25, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 10-3136

v. (D. Kansas)

CHARLES LALIBERTE,

Defendant - Appellant.

(D.C. Nos. 6:10-CV-01059-WEB and 

6:07-CR-10022-WEB-4)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Before HARTZ, ANDERSON, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.

Charles Laliberte entered a conditional plea of guilty to conspiracy to

distribute a controlled substance, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his

motion to suppress evidence. On appeal we affirmed the denial. See United

States v. Laliberte, 308 F. App’x 295 (10th Cir. 2009). Mr. Laliberte then filed a

motion under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 to set aside his conviction. The motion was

denied by the district court, and Mr. Laliberte now seeks a certificate of

appealability (COA) to appeal that denial. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (requiring

COA to appeal denial of application). We deny a COA and dismiss the appeal.

Mr. Laliberte’s application for a COA and opening brief in this appeal is

rambling and incoherent. But it is clear that the gist of it relates to the search that

he challenged on his prior appeal. Although he contends that his attorney
-2-

rendered ineffective assistance, his pleading in this court does not mention any

specific lapse by his attorney. Rather, his arguments address the merits of his

suppression motion.

To obtain a COA in a § 2255 proceeding, the movant must make “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2). This standard requires “a demonstration that . . . includes showing

that reasonable jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the

petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues

presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Slack v.

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (internal quotation marks omitted). In other

words, the applicant must show that the district court’s resolution of the

constitutional claim was either “debatable or wrong.” Id.

Under that standard, Mr. Laliberte is not entitled to a COA. His argument

in this court is no more than a challenge to our ruling on his prior appeal. But we

will not consider an issue raised under § 2255 that we have resolved on a prior

appeal. See United States v. Prichard, 875 F.2d 789, 791 (10th Cir. 1989) (per

curiam) (“Absent an intervening change in the law of a circuit, issues disposed of

on direct appeal generally will not be considered on a collateral attack by a

motion pursuant to § 2255.”).

No reasonable jurist could debate that the district court erred in denying

Mr. Laliberte’s motion under § 2255.
-3-

We DENY the application for COA and dismiss the appeal. We also

DENY all pending motions.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Harris L Hartz

Circuit Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Clearinghouse Contract Review.                    

*Date:*                         June 5, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         7 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20817.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Helen Lin, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, NIH/NIAMS/RB, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800, Plaza One, Bethesda, MD 20817, 301-594-4952,                         *linh1@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: May 9, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2434 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M