26780 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 91 / Friday, May 11, 2007 / Notices 

1The violations charged occurred between 2003 

and 2004. The Regulations governing the violations 

at issue are found in the 2003–2004 versions of the 

Code of Federal Regulations (15 CFR part 730–774 

(2003–2004)). The 2006 Regulations govern the 

procedural aspects of the case. 

2Since August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse 

and the President, through Executive Order 13222 

of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), 

which has been extended by successive Presidential 

Notices, the most recent being that of August 2, 

2006 (71 FR 44,551 (Aug. 7, 2006)), has continued 

the Regulations in effect under the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–

1706 (2000)) (‘‘IEEPA’’). 

3EAR 99 is a designation for items subject to the 

Regulations that are not listed on the Commerce 

Control List. 

4The Iranian Transactions Regulations are 

currently codified in the Code of Federal 

Regulations at 31 CFR part 560 (2006). 

Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification 

I certify that the following action will 

not have a significant impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The major factors considered for this 

certification were: 

1. The action will not result in any 

additional reporting, recordkeeping or 

other compliance requirements for small 

entities other than the small 

organizations that will furnish the 

services to the Government. 

2. The action will result in 

authorizing small entities to furnish the 

services to the Government. 

3. There are no known regulatory 

alternatives which would accomplish 

the objectives of the Javits-WagnerO’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46–48c) in 

connection with the services proposed 

for addition to the Procurement List. 

End of Certification 

Accordingly, the following services 

are added to the Procurement List: 

Services 

Service Type/Location: Furniture Moving 

Services, U.S. Department of 

Agriculture—Forest Service, Region 8, 

1720 Peachtree Road, NW., Atlanta, GA. 

NPA: Bobby Dodd Institute, Inc., Atlanta, 

GA. 

Contracting Activity: U.S. Department of 

Agriculture—Forest Service, Atlanta, 

GA. 

Service Type/Location: Maintenance/ 

Custodial/Administrative Services, U.S. 

Department of Agriculture—Forest 

Service, Caribbean National Forest, Rio 

Grande, PR. 

NPA: The Corporate Source, Inc., New York, 

NY. 

Contracting Activity: U.S. Department of 

Agriculture, Forest Service, Cleveland, 

TN. 

Deletions 

On March 9, 2007 the Committee for 

Purchase From People Who Are Blind 

or Severely Disabled published notice 

(72 FR10641) of proposed deletions to 

the Procurement List. 

After consideration of the relevant 

matter presented, the Committee has 

determined that the products listed 

below are no longer suitable for 

procurement by the Federal Government 

under 41 U.S.C. 46–48c and 41 CFR 51–

2.4. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification 

I certify that the following action will 

not have a significant impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The major factors considered for this 

certification were: 

1. The action may result in additional 

reporting, recordkeeping or other 

compliance requirements for small 

entities. 

2. The action may result in 

authorizing small entities to furnish the 

products to the Government. 

3. There are no known regulatory 

alternatives which would accomplish 

the objectives of the Javits-WagnerO’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46–48c) in 

connection with the products deleted 

from the Procurement List. 

End of Certification 

Accordingly, the following products 

are deleted from the Procurement List: 

Products 

Perforator, Paper, Desk, 

NSN: 7520–01–431–6246—Perforator, Paper, 

Desk. 

NSN: 7520–01–431–6252—Perforator, Paper, 

Desk. 

NPA: Foothill Workshop for the 

Handicapped, Inc., Pasadena, CA. 

Contracting Activity: Office Supplies & Paper 

Products Acquisition Ctr, New York, NY. 

G. John Heyer, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. E7–9116 Filed 5–10–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6353–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

Action Affecting Export Privileges; 

Khalid Mahmood; In the Matter of 

Khalid Mahmood, 11505 Blue Ridge 

Drive, Beltsville, MD 20750, 

Respondent 

Order Relating to Khalid Mahmood 

The Bureau of Industry and Security, 

U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘BIS’’) 

has notified Khalid Mahmood 

(hereinafter referred to as ‘‘Mahmood’’) 

of its intention to initiate an 

administrative proceeding against 

Mahmood pursuant to Section 766.3 of 

the Export Administration Regulations 

(currently codified at 15 CFR parts 730–

774 (2006)) (‘‘Regulations’’) 1 and 

Section 13(c) of the Export 

Administration Act of 1979, as amended 

(50 U.S.C. app. sections 2401–2420 

(2000)) (‘‘Act’’),2 by issuing a proposed 

charging letter to Mahmood that alleged 

that Mahmood committed six violations 

of the Regulations. Specifically, the 

charges are: 

Charge 1 15 CFR 764.2(d)—

Conspiracy To Violate the Regulations 

Beginning in or about February 2003 

and continuing through in or about 

December 2004, Mahmood acted in 

concert with others, known and 

unknown, to do or bring about an act 

that violates the Regulations. The 

purpose of the conspiracy was to export 

lift truck parts (‘‘parts’’) items subject to 

the Regulations (‘‘EAR 99’’ 3) and the 

Iranian Transactions Regulations,4 from 

the United States to Iran without the 

required U.S. Government 

authorization. In furtherance of the 

conspiracy, Mahmood facilitated the 

export of parts from the United States 

through the United Arab Emirates 

(‘‘UAE’’) to Iran. Pursuant to Section 

746.7 of the Regulations, authorization 

was required from the Office of Foreign 

Assets Control, U.S. Department of 

Treasury (‘‘OFAC’’) before the parts 

could be exported to Iran. Failure to 

obtain authorization from OFAC is a 

violation of the Regulations. In so doing, 

Mahmood committed one violation of 

Section 764.2(d) of the Regulations. 

Charges 2–6 15 CFR 764.2(b)—

Causing the Export of Lift Truck Parts 

to Iran Without the Required 

Authorizations 

On five occasions between on or 

about March 28, 2003 and on or about 

December 18, 2003, Mahmood caused 

the doing of an act prohibited by the 

Regulations. Specifically, Mahmood 

coordinated the shipping of parts, items 

subject to the Regulations (‘‘EAR 99’’) 

and the Iranian Transactions 

Regulations, from the United States to 

Iran through the UAE without the 

required U.S. Government 

authorizations. Pursuant to Section 

560.204 of the Iranian Transactions 

Regulations, an export to a third country 

intended for transshipment to Iran is a 

transaction subject to the Iranian 

Transactions Regulations. Pursuant to 

Section 746.7 of the Regulations, 

authorization was required from OFAC 

for the shipment of the parts from the 

United States to Iran. Failure to obtain 

authorization from OFAC is a violation 

of the Regulations. By causing these 

exports in this manner, Mahmood 

committed five violations of Section 

764.2(b) of the Regulations. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 91 / Friday, May 11, 2007 / Notices 26781 

Whereas, BIS and Mahmood have 

entered into a Settlement Agreement 

pursuant to Section 766.18(a) of the 

Regulations whereby they agreed to 

settle this matter in accordance with the 

terms and conditions set forth therein, 

and 

Whereas, I have approved the terms of 

such Settlement Agreement; 

It is therefore ordered: 

First, that for a period of ten years 

from the date of entry of this Order, 

Khalid Mahmood, 11505 Blue Ridge 

Drive, Beltsville, MD 20750, and when 

acting for or on behalf of Mahmood, his 

representatives or agents (‘‘Denied 

Person’’) may not, directly or indirectly, 

participate in any way in any 

transaction involving any commodity, 

software, or technology (hereinafter 

collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) 

exported or to be exported from the 

United States that is subject to the 

Regulations, or in any other activity 

subject to the Regulations, including, 

but not limited to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, License Exception, or 

export control document; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the Regulations, or in any 

other activity subject to the Regulations; 

or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the Regulations, or in 

any other activity subject to the 

Regulations. 

Second, that no person may, directly 

or indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf 

of the Denied Person any items subject 

to the Regulations; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

the Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession, or control of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States, including financing or other 

support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Denied Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Denied Person of 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been exported from the United 

States; 

D. Obtain from the Denied Person in 

the United States any item subject to the 

Regulations with knowledge or reason 

to know that the item will be, or is 

intended to be, exported from the 

United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Denied 

Person, or service any item, of whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by the Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States. For purposes of this paragraph, 

servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification or 

testing. 

Third, that, after notice and 

opportunity for comment as provided in 

Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any 

person, firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to Mahmood by 

affiliation, ownership, control, or 

position of responsibility in the conduct 

of trade or related services may also be 

made subject to the provisions of the 

Order. 

Fourth, that this Order does not 

prohibit any export, reexport, or other 

transaction subject to the Regulations 

where the only items involved that are 

subject to the Regulations are the 

foreign-produced direct product of U.S.- 

origin technology. 

Fifth, that the proposed charging 

letter, the Settlement Agreement, and 

this Order shall be made available to the 

public. 

Sixth, that this Order shall be served 

on the Denied Person and on BIS, and 

shall be published in the Federal 

Register. 

This Order, which constitutes the 

final agency action in this matter, is 

effective immediately. 

Entered this 2nd day of May 2007. 

Darryl W. Jackson, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export 

Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 07–2322 Filed 5–10–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–OT–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

A–570–846 

Brake Rotors From the People’s 

Republic of China: Notice of Extension 

of the Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 11, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jennifer Moats or Blanche Ziv, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 8, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–5047 and (202) 

482–4207, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) received a timely request 

from Longkou Qizheng Auto Parts Co., 

Ltd. (‘‘Qizheng’’), in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.214(c), to conduct a 

semiannual new shipper review of the 

antidumping duty order on brake rotors 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’). See Notice of Antidumping 

Duty Order: Brake Rotors from the 

People’s Republic of China, 62 FR 18740 

(April 17, 1997). On November 30, 2006, 

the Department found that the request 

for review with respect to Qizheng met 

all of the regulatory requirements set 

forth in 19 CFR 351.214(b) and initiated 

a semiannual new shipper review of the 

antidumping duty order on brake rotors 

for the April 1, 2006, through September 

30, 2006, period. See Brake Rotors from 

the People’s Republic of China: 

Initiation of New Shipper Review, 71 FR 

69203 (November 30, 2006). On March 

8, 2007, the Department expanded the 

period of review (‘‘POR’’) of this 

semiannual new shipper review through 

October 30, 2006, to capture the entry 

corresponding to Qizheng’s first sale to 

the United States. See Memorandum to 

Wendy J. Frankel, Office Director, 

through Blanche Ziv, Program Manager, 

from Jennifer Moats, Analyst, Regarding 

Expansion of the Period of Review. 

Therefore, the POR for the semiannual 

new shipper review of Qizheng is April 

1, 2006, through October 30, 2006. The 

preliminary results are currently due no 

later than May 21, 2007. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES