alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2532 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2532

To amend the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 to increase 
   the limitation on the amount of community development block grant 
        assistance that may be used to provide public services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 2009

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 to increase 
   the limitation on the amount of community development block grant 
        assistance that may be used to provide public services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Community Development Block Grant 
Improvement Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN CDBG PUBLIC SERVICES CAP.

    Paragraph (8) of section 105(a) of the Housing and Community 
Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5305(a)(8)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``15 per centum'' each place such term 
        appears and inserting ``50 percent''; and
            (2) by striking ``unless such unit'' and all that follows 
        through ``yields the higher amount''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 99.21****CONSENT OF EXPERT**     Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Cameco Corporation (the“Company”) to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.     I hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name under the heading “Centerra GoldInc. — Reserves and Resources” in the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year endedDecember 31, 2007, dated March 28, 2008 (the “AIF”) and in the 40-F, and to disclosure of ascientific and technical nature pursuant to which I have acted in a supervisory capacity under theheading “Centerra Gold Inc. — Reserves and Resources” of the AIF.     Sincerely,
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 48808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20351]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

    The following notice of scheduled meetings is published pursuant to 
the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-
409, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

Agency Holding the Meetings

    Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Times and Dates

    The Commission has scheduled meetings for the following dates:
    October 4, 2011 at 9:30 a.m.
    October 18, 2011 at 9:30 a.m.
    November 1, 2011 at 9:30 a.m.
    November 17, 2011 at 9:30 a.m.

Place

    Three Lafayette Center, 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC. Lobby 
Level Hearing Room (Room 1000).

STATUS: Open.

Matters To Be Considered

    The Commission has scheduled these meetings to consider various 
rulemaking matters, including the issuance of proposed rules and the 
approval of final rules. The Commission may also consider and vote on 
dates and times for future meetings. Agendas for each of the scheduled 
meetings will be made available to the public and posted on the 
Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov at least seven (7) days 
prior to the meeting. In the event that the times or dates of the 
meetings change, an announcement of the change, along with the new time 
and place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: David A. Stawick, Secretary of the 
Commission, 202-418-5071.

David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-20351 Filed 8-5-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40446 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE LUIS SANCHEZ-ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:03-CR-706-ALL

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Luis Sanchez-Ortiz raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            This certification is being filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  This certification is included solely for the purpose of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not to be used for any other purpose.  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Asia Properties, Inc., for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, I, Daniel S. Mckinney, hereby certify in my capacity as an officer of Asia Properties, Inc., that to my knowledge:

            1.  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Asia Properties, Inc., for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2.  The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Asia Properties, Inc., for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Asia Properties, Inc.,

Date: February 17, 2005                                                By:                                                                               

Daniel S. Mckinney, President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Director (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
# C_2012303EN.01000803.xml

| 6.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/8

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 July 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Revere — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Majali Abdel

(Case C-75/12) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - No description of the main proceedings - manifestly inadmissible)

2012/C 303/17

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Giudice di Pace di Revere

Party in the main proceedings

Party in the main proceedings

Majali Abdel

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Giudice di Pace di Revere — Interpretation of Articles 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 15 and 16 of Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98) and Article 4(3) TEU — National legislation imposing a fine on a foreign national who has entered national territory illegally or has stayed there illegally — Whether it is permissible to regard illegal stay as a criminal offence — Whether it is possible to substitute for the fine an order for immediate expulsion for a period of at least five years or a measure restricting freedom (‘permanenza domiciliare’) — Member States’ obligations during the period for transposition of a directive

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Revere (Italy), by decision of 26 January 2012, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 21.4.2012.

1

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MAURICE ODELL DRAKE,

Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-11800

Paul D. Borman

v. United States District Judge

COMMISSIONER OF R. Steven Whalen

SOCIAL SECURITY, United States Magistrate Judge

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER (1) ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE R. STEVEN WHALEN’S MAY 31, 2016

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 18), (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 16), (3) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 17), AND

(4) AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER

On May 31, 2016 Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen issued a Report and Recommendation

to deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary

Judgment, and affirm the findings of the Commissioner. (ECF No. 18, Report and

Recommendation.) Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely

objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Report

and Recommendation, DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 16), GRANTS

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 17), and AFFIRMS the findings of the 

Commissioner.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Paul D. Borman 

PAUL D. BORMAN

Dated: June 30, 2016 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

2:15-cv-11800-PDB-RSW Doc # 19 Filed 06/30/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 523
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or

party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on June 30, 2016.

s/Deborah Tofil 

Case Manager

2

2:15-cv-11800-PDB-RSW Doc # 19 Filed 06/30/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 524
§ 182.620 Auxiliary means of steering. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, a vessel must be provided with an auxiliary means of steering that is: ( 1 ) Of adequate strength;
( 2 ) Capable of moving the rudder from 15 degrees on one side to 15 degrees on the other side in not more than 60 seconds with the vessel at one-half its maximum service speed ahead, or 7 knots, whichever is greater; and
( 3 ) Controlled from a location that permits safe maneuvering of the vessel and does not expose the person operating the auxiliary means of steering to personnel hazards during normal or heavy weather operation.
( b ) A suitable hand tiller may be acceptable as the auxiliary means of steering where satisfactory to the cognizant OCMI.
( c ) An auxiliary means of steering need not be provided if: ( 1 ) The main steering gear and its controls are provided in duplicate;
( 2 ) Multiple screw propulsion, with independent pilothouse control for each screw, is provided, and the vessel is capable of being steered using pilothouse control;
( 3 ) No regular rudder is fitted and steering action is obtained by a change of setting of the propelling unit; or
( 4 ) Where a rudder and hand tiller are the main steering gear.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 986, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51050, Sept. 30, 1997]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 87 (Monday, May 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 25756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2280]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date and Time: Thursday, May 17, 2007, 10 a.m.-1 p.m.

Place: U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave., NW., 
Suite 150, Washington, DC 20005 (Metro Stop: Metro Center).

Agenda: The Commission will receive updates on the activities of the 
following: The EAC Standards Board; the EAC Board of Advisors; and the 
EAC Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC). The Commission 
will consider other administrative matters.
    This meeting will be open to the public.

For Further Information Contact: Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 566-
3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-2280 Filed 5-3-07; 3:40 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M
#### Eliza Jane Guion, *Appellant, v.*Isaac Clark, *Respondent*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Gilbert, J.;

Dykman, J., not sitting.
#### § 113.43-1 Applicability.

This subpart applies to each vessel of 1600 gross tons and over that has power driven main or auxiliary steering gear.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending August 5, 2006

----

Bank Holding CompaniesTrustmark Corporation, Jackson, Mississippi  -- to merge with Republic Bancshares of Texas, Inc., Houston, Texas, and acquire its subsidiary, Republic National Bank.					-Approved, August 2, 2006 					

Regulations And PoliciesEmployment of Noncitizens  -- publication for comment of an interim rule that would revise the Rules Regarding Equal Opportunity to permit a limited group of noncitizen employees to have access to confidential supervisory information.					-Approved, July 29, 2006 					(AC)Fair Credit Reporting Act  -- joint report to Congress on compliance with the consumer dispute provisions of the act.					-Approved, August 4, 2006 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: August 10, 2006
---

---

EXHIBIT 8.1

Subsidiaries

|ENTITY                                   | PLACE OF INCORPORATION
|---------------------------------------- | ----------------------
|                                         |                       
|Cimatron Technologies, Inc.              | United States         
|Cimatron Technologies Inc.               | Canada                
|Cimatron GmbH                            | Germany               
|Cimatron Sarl                            | France                
|Cimatron UK Ltd.                         | United Kingdom        
|Microsystem Srl *                        | Italy                 
|Cimatron Japan K.K                       | Japan                 
|Cimatron Technologies (P) Ltd            | India                 
|Cimatron (Beijing) Technology Co. Ltd.   | China                 
|Cimatron (Guangzhou) Technology Co. Ltd. | China                 
|Korea Cimatron Technologies Co. Ltd.**   | Korea                 

|* | As
of July 1st, 2005 we hold 27.5% of the outstanding share capital of
Microsystem, pursuant to the agreements we signed with Microsystem and its shareholders.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|** | We
hold only 30% of the shares of this joint venture, which we formed in Korea together with
JY Solutec Co., LTD.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
# C_2013252EN.01005003.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/50

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 24 June 2013 — Mateo Pérez v Commission

(Case F-144/11) (1)

(Civil Service - General competition - Application for annulment of a corrigendum to a notice of competition - Corrigendum not providing for conditions excluding the applicant - No act having adverse effects - Non-admission to selection tests - Admissibility - Time-limits for bringing actions - Lateness - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2013/C 252/92)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Carlos Mateo Pérez (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: I. Ruiz García, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision not to admit the applicant to the selection tests following publication of a corrigendum to the notice of competition annulling the eliminatory mark for situational judgment test (d).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | The European Commission shall bear its own costs and the costs of Mr Mateo Pérez arising as from 14 March 2012, the date on which the defence was lodged. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission shall bear its own costs and the costs of Mr Mateo Pérez arising as from 14 March 2012, the date on which the defence was lodged.

| 3. | Mr Mateo Pérez shall bear his own costs arising before 14 March 2012. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Mr Mateo Pérez shall bear his own costs arising before 14 March 2012.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 65, 3.3.2012, p. 27.

---
### THE A-JlxlxDENEY 

## GENECBBE ’ TEXAS

Honorable

L. R. Thom$~_m CountyAuditor * Taylor County Abilene,

Texas Ds+r. sir: op~nicm No. 04p23 Re: Whether voters liv:ng at Lake Kirby in the city of Abilene may vote'.Zima

city election POW request for an opinion whereinyou state +~bat L&e K'irby'is

located sppra~imately

three miles from the, city limits 01 Abilene, but has been anhexed tathe city and is com@+d theretoby a narrow strip of land and whereinyou ask if a pa?$y livingat Lake Kirby is entitledto vote at:cityelections,-has been received

by this office.~ You aYe advisedthat a person who is otherwise

qual%fied

and liveswithin the corporate

limits of the city of Abilene is entitled to vote at' 8 city election. Of.course,

we do not have before us and are n&..passing upon the validity

of the ordinance

of annexation. Yours very truly

ATTclRlw G!3NmAL

OF TEXAS s/Richard H.'Cocke
By RichardH. Co&e

Assistant

APPROVED: s/,W. F. Moore ATTORNEYGENE3ALOFTEXW
Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-15-00080-CV

Carolyn Sovann 

v.

Houston Housing Authority

NO. 1055785 IN THE CO CIVIL CT AT LAW NO 4 OF HARRIS COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE

CLK RECORD

FILING

$10.00

$23.00

$195.00

02/05/2015

02/05/2015

01/26/2015

PAID

PAID

NOT PAID

ANT

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are 

$228.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby 

certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my 

hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the 

First District of Texas, this July 24, 2015.
§ 197.342 Buoyancy-changing devices. ( a ) A dry suit or other buoyancy-changing device not directly connected to the exhaust valve of the helmet or mask must have an independent exhaust valve.
( b ) When used for SCUBA diving, a buoyancy-changing device must have an inflation source separate from the breathing gas supply.
§ 202.5 Replies and requests that review not be exercised—content. Replies and requests that review not be exercised shall contain in the order here indicated— ( a ) A reference to the decision, report, order, or action of the Board;
( b ) A concise statement of the interests of the party submitting the paper;
( c ) Where deemed necessary by the submitting party, a concise summary statement of the case explicitly pointing out any inaccuracy or omission in the statement of the other side, with references to the record where appropriate;
( d ) A listing of the reasons why review should not be exercised, each reason set forth in a separate, numbered paragraph;
( e ) The argument generally amplifying the material in paragraph (d) of this section and, in addition, specifically replying to the points of law, policy and fact presented by the other side (each stated separately) citing the authorities, statutes, and other material relied upon by the submitting party;
( f ) A conclusion, specifying with particularity the action which the submitting party believes the Secretary should take.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         490,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,857,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  243,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    43,000
<INVENTORY>                                    130,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,735,000
<PP&E>                                       2,941,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,134,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,609,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          773,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,000
<COMMON>                                       179,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,564,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,609,000
<SALES>                                      1,475,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,475,000
<CGS>                                          197,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,430,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                848,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            848,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   848,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05



</TABLE>