alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### JACOB ROSENTHAL, RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH ENGEL, APPELLANT.

Argued October 2, 1928

Decided March 11, 1929.

Before Justices Tbenchakd, Kalisch and Lloyd.

For the appellant, *Cohen & Klein.*

For the respondent, *David M. Litwin.*

*273Pee Cubiam.

This was an action in the Eirst District Court of Newark to recover on a check for $500 given to the defendant as deposit money at the execution of an agreement between the plaintiff as vendor and the defendant as purchaser for the sale of property in the city of Newark. The check was given on October 25th, 1927, and on the following day payment was stopped, defendant writing a letter stating that he could not go on with the transaction but giving no reason other than his inability to meet the payments. When the case came on for trial it was sought to show that the property was subject to encroachments of various kinds and this became an issue of fact as we think for the trial court. The case was heard by the judge without a jury, who gave judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals and files twelve specifications of determinations with which he is dissatisfied in point of law, the substance of which is that the court erred for various reasons in giving judgment for the plaintiff.

The crucial point in the case was whether the evidence so clearly established the existence of the encroachments as to require a finding by the trial judge in favor of the defendant on that issue. Our reading of the testimony convinces us that it was not of a character to justify the withdrawal of the question as one of fact. A surveyor who was called by the defendant gave testimony from which it might be inferred that the encroachments existed, but his testimony was based largely on an old survey which had not been proved and was far from conclusive that said encroachment did exist.

A tenement house inspector testified that there were violations of the tenement house law in the property but there was nothing to indicate that this could not have been removed at the time fixed for settlement.

Under the circumstances we think that the question presented was one of fact, which cannot be here reviewed and that the judgment cannot consequently be disturbed.

It is, therefore, affirmed.
# C_2013344EN.01003001.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/30

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Central Administrativo Sul — Portugal) — ITELCAR — Automóveis de Aluguer Lda v Fazenda Pública

(Case C-282/12) (1)

1

(Free movement of capital - Tax legislation - Corporation tax - Interest paid by a resident company on funds lent by a company established in a non-member country - Existence of ‘special relations’ between those companies - Thin capitalisation rules - No right of deduction in relation to interest on the part of the overall debt regarded as excessive - Interest deductible if paid to a company resident in the national territory - Tax evasion and avoidance - Wholly artificial arrangements - Arm’s length terms - Proportionality)

2013/C 344/51

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Central Administrativo Sul

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: ITELCAR — Automóveis de Aluguer Lda

Appellant:

Respondent: Fazenda Pública

Respondent:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal Central Administrativo Sul (Portugal) — Interpretation of Article 63 TFEU and Article 65 TFEU — Tax legislation — Corporation tax — Interest deductible on borrowing — National rules providing for deduction in the case of excessive indebtedness to a company established in the national territory but not in the case of excessive indebtedness to a company established in a non-member country

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 56 EC must be interpreted as meaning that, in the case of rules of a Member State which provide that, where interest applied to the part of an overall debt categorised as excessive has been paid by a resident company to a lending company established in a non-member country with which the borrowing company has special relations, it is not deductible as an expense for the purposes of determining taxable profit, but where such interest is paid to a resident lending company with which the borrowing company has special relations, it is deductible for those purposes, those rules are precluded where, if the lending company established in a non-member country does not have a shareholding in the resident borrowing company, they nevertheless presume that the overall debt owed by the borrowing company forms part of an arrangement designed to avoid the tax normally payable or where they do not make it possible, at the outset, to determine their scope with sufficient precision.

---

(1)  OJ C 250, 18.8.2012.

1

---
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-10-0040

SAT Date: 11/13/2009

Print Date: 4/20/2011

Related cases: CBI: Yes

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1 1

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

3 31

Exposure Based Review:

Health:

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: No exposures needed

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: 

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-10-0040

FATE: 

Solid 

S < 0.001 mg/L at 25 EC (E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 EC (E)

BP > 400 EC (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 0-90 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = low - v.strong
PBT Potential: P3B3

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl - rapid

Direct photolysis will be negl - rapid

Indirect photolysis will be negl - rapid

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is nil all routes (pchem); 

 No significant health concerns.

 Ecotox:

Test 

Organism

Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value *

daphnid _ chronic value *

algal _ chronic value *

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for neutral organic chemicals; 

SAR chemical class = MW>1,000,000; solid; log 

Kow >> 10 (P); S = negligible; pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active 

ingredients and nominal concentrations; DW hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and DW TOC 

<2.0 mg/L

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

NES *

SARs neutral organic chemicals

SAR Class

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
EXHIBIT  10.2

   BRITISH                          Ministry  of Employment and Investment
  COLUMBIA                              Energy  and  Minerals  Division
                                            Mineral  Titles  Branch

                              Mineral Tenure Number
                                Section 57 and 58

                              BILL OF SALE ABSOLUTE

Indicate  Type  of  Title:   MINERAL
               (Mineral  or  Placer)

MINING  DIVISION:    SIMILKAMEEN

SELLER          PURCHASER

I,  RICHARD  BILLINGSLEY             HENLEY  VENTURES  INC.
11114  147A  Street                  3rd  Floor  -  830  West  Pender  Street
Surrey,  B.C.                        Vancouver,  British  Columbia
V3R  3W2      604-868  2475          V6C  1J8

Client  Number:  139085

For  and  in  consideration  of  the  sum  of  ONE  dollars  ($1.00)

Paid  to  me,  do  hereby  sell the interest as specified below in the following
mineral  titles:

     CLAIM  NAME  OR  LEASE          TENURE          PERCENTAGE  OF
             TYPE                    NUMBER          TITLE  BEING  SOLD
             ----                    ------          ------------------

       RED  BIRD                      412526               100%
       RED  BIRD  1                   412527               100%
       RED  BIRD  2                   412528               100%
       RED  BIRD  3                   412529               100%
       RED  BIRD  4                   412530               100%
       RED  BIRD  5                   412531               100%

I  declare that I have a good title to these tenures and every right to sell the
same,  in  witness  whereof  I  have  today  signed  my  legal  name.

          July  28,  2004
          ---------------
                (Date)

          /s/  "Gaye  Richards"               /s/  "R.J.  Billingsley"
          ---------------------               ------------------------
        (Signature  of  Witness)              (Signature  of  Seller)

If  a  corporation,  either the corporate seal or signature of a signing officer
with  position  in  corporation  stated.
#### § 188.10-49 Numbered vessel.

This term means a vessel which is numbered under the provisions of 46 U.S.C. Chapter 123.

[CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51219, Sept. 30, 1997]
<PAGE>
 
                                 EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                                  LYCOS, INC.
                     COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE (1)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                     THREE MONTHS                 INCEPTION
                                        ENDED      YEAR ENDED   (JUNE 1, 1995)
                                       JULY 31,     JULY 31,     TO JULY 31,
                                         1996         1996           1995
                                     ------------  -----------  --------------
<S>                                  <C>           <C>          <C>
Common stock, beginning of period...  13,792,896    10,000,000    10,000,000
Cheap stock shares relating to SAB
 No. 83(2)..........................                 1,086,956     1,086,956
Weighted average common shares out-
 standing during the period.........                   979,651
Treasury stock buyback..............                   (74,192)      (74,192)
                                     -----------   -----------   -----------
                                      13,792,896    11,992,415    11,012,764
                                     ===========   ===========   ===========
Net loss............................ $(2,205,996)  $(5,087,838)  $  (105,381)
Primary net loss per share.......... $     (0.16)  $     (0.42)  $     (0.01)
                                     ===========   ===========   ===========
</TABLE>
--------
(1) Fully diluted net loss per share has not been separately presented, as the
    amounts would not be materially different from primary net loss per share.
(2) Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin
    No. 83, certain common and common equivalent shares issued by the Company
    during the twelve months immediately preceding the initial filing of the
    registration statement relating to the Company's initial public offering
    have been included in the calculation of weighted average shares, using
    the treasury stock method and the initial public offering price, as if
    these shares were outstanding for all periods prior to the initial public
    offering.
# C_2014184EN.01002104.xml

| 16.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/21

---

Order of the President of the Court of 26 February 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Werner Krieger v ERGO Lebensversicherung AG

(Case C-459/12) (1)

1

2014/C 184/28

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 9, 12.1.2013.

1

---
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.167 Filed 06/30/03 Page 1 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.168 Filed 06/30/03 Page 2 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.169 Filed 06/30/03 Page 3 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.170 Filed 06/30/03 Page 4 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.171 Filed 06/30/03 Page 5 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.172 Filed 06/30/03 Page 6 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.173 Filed 06/30/03 Page 7 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.174 Filed 06/30/03 Page 8 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.175 Filed 06/30/03 Page 9 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.176 Filed 06/30/03 Page 10 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.177 Filed 06/30/03 Page 11 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.178 Filed 06/30/03 Page 12 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.179 Filed 06/30/03 Page 13 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.180 Filed 06/30/03 Page 14 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.181 Filed 06/30/03 Page 15 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.182 Filed 06/30/03 Page 16 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.183 Filed 06/30/03 Page 17 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.184 Filed 06/30/03 Page 18 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.185 Filed 06/30/03 Page 19 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.186 Filed 06/30/03 Page 20 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.187 Filed 06/30/03 Page 21 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.188 Filed 06/30/03 Page 22 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.189 Filed 06/30/03 Page 23 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.190 Filed 06/30/03 Page 24 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.191 Filed 06/30/03 Page 25 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.192 Filed 06/30/03 Page 26 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.193 Filed 06/30/03 Page 27 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.194 Filed 06/30/03 Page 28 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.195 Filed 06/30/03 Page 29 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.196 Filed 06/30/03 Page 30 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.197 Filed 06/30/03 Page 31 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.198 Filed 06/30/03 Page 32 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-72802-GER ECF No. 32, PageID.199 Filed 06/30/03 Page 33 of 33
# C_2014409EN.01000502.xml

| 17.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 September 2014 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-527/12) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - State aid incompatible with the internal market - Obligation to recover - Article 108(2) TFEU - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Article 14(3) - Commission decision - Measures to be taken by the Member States))

2014/C 409/06

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and F. Erlbacher, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze and K. Petersen, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to take all necessary measures to recover from the beneficiary the State aid which was the subject of Commission Decision 2011/471/EU of 14 December 2010 on State aid granted by Germany to the Biria group (C 38/05 (ex NN 52/04)), the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 108(2) TFEU, Article 14(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of [Article 108 TFEU], and Articles 1 to 3 of that decision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to take all necessary measures to recover from the beneficiary the State aid which was the subject of Commission Decision 2011/471/EU of 14 December 2010 on State aid granted by Germany to the Biria group (C 38/05 (ex NN 52/04)), the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 108(2) TFEU, Article 14(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of [Article 108 TFEU], and Articles 1 to 3 of that decision;

| 2. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.

1

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

CHESTER BODMAN, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case No. 2:14-cv-14420 

v. District Judge David M. Lawson 

 Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti 

ARAMARK CORPORATION, et al., 

 

 Defendants. 

___________________________________/ 

ORDER TO PROVIDE THE CORRECT ADDRESS FOR DEFENDANTS 

Plaintiff, Chester Bodman, a state prisoner who is proceeding without the 

assistance of counsel, filed his complaint and application to proceed without 

prepayment of fees on November 18, 2014. (DE 1 and 2.) He brings his claims 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, alleging violations of the Due Process and Equal 

Protection clauses of the United States Constitution based on his allegedly 

wrongful termination as a food service worker at the Saginaw Correctional 

Facility. Plaintiff names as Defendants Deputy Warden Obell Thomas Winn, the 

Aramark Corporation, and Aramark employees Davre Davidson, Bob Marshall, 

Joseph Neubauer, Eric J. Foss, and Chrissy Sharp. 

2:14-cv-14420-DML-APP Doc # 21 Filed 04/09/15 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 104
2 

The Court granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed without prepayment of 

fees and ordered service by the U.S. Marshals on November 25, 2014. (DE 4.) 

Although Plaintiff did not provide addresses for the Defendants in his complaint, 

the U.S. Marshals attempted service on all Defendants, other than the Aramark 

Corporation, at the Saginaw Correctional Facility. On December 31, 2014, 

waivers of service were returned unexecuted as to Defendants Davidson, Sharp, 

Marshall, Neubauer, and Foss. (DE 14-18.) Each notice indicated that the 

Saginaw Correctional Facility could not accept service because it did not employ 

these Defendants. To date, Defendants Davidson, Sharp, Marshall, Neubauer, and 

Foss have not been served. 

 Plaintiff is therefore ORDERED to provide the Court with addresses for 

Defendants Davidson, Sharp, Marshall, Neubauer, and Foss so that service can 

again be attempted. Plaintiff is to provide the information to the Court in writing 

ON OR BEFORE MAY 1, 2015. Failure to provide this information could result 

in a Report and Recommendation that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants 

Davidson, Sharp, Marshall, Neubauer, and Foss be dismissed for failure to effect 

service under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Thereafter, the U.S. Marshals 

Service SHALL re-attempt service of the summons and Complaint upon these 

Defendants at the addresses provided by Plaintiff. 

2:14-cv-14420-DML-APP Doc # 21 Filed 04/09/15 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 105
3 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 9, 2015 s/Anthony P. Patti 

 Anthony P. Patti 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record 

on April 9, 2015, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail. 

 s/Michael Williams 

 Case Manager for the 

Honorable Anthony P. Patti 

(313) 234-5200 

2:14-cv-14420-DML-APP Doc # 21 Filed 04/09/15 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 106
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of L.A.M. Pharmaceutical Corp.
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Joseph T. Slechta,
the President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Chief
Accounting Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of his knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects the financial condition and results of the Company. October 13, 2004
    
    /s/ Joseph T. SlechtaJoseph T. Slechta, President, Chief Executive Officer,Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1819 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1819

  To amend the Digital Television Transition and Public Safety Act of 
2005 to extend the interoperable emergency communications grant program 
                       through fiscal year 2012.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 31, 2009

   Mr. Cao introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Digital Television Transition and Public Safety Act of 
2005 to extend the interoperable emergency communications grant program 
                       through fiscal year 2012.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

    Section 3006(a)(2) of the Digital Television Transition and Public 
Safety Act of 2005 is amended by striking ``2010'' and inserting 
``2012''.
                                 <all>
```
AVA 


NCDENR 


North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 

Beverly Eaves Perdue Dee Freeman 


Governor Secretary 


December 1, 2011 

Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region4 

61 Forsyth Street, SW 

Atlanta, GA 30303-3104 

SUBJECf: 	 NC Concurrence with NPL Listing; 

Holcomb Creosote Co. 

Yadkinville, YadkinCounty, NC 27055 

EPA ID: NCD 024 900 987 

Deru· Ms. Fleming, 

I run writing in response to your request for the state of North Carolina's position 

regarding the proposed listing of the Holcomb Creosote, Co. site on the National 

Priorities List (NPL). 

The State of North Carolina agrees that the site poses a significant tlu·eat to the 

public health and the env:iJ:onment. Therefore, we support the Environmental Protection 

Agency's efforts to propose this site for inclusion on the NPL. 

North Carolina appreciates the EPA's continued assistance to protect the state's 

public health and the environment. If you have any questions or require further 

assistance, please do not hesitate to contact Dexter Matthews, Director of the North 

Carolina Division of Waste Management, at (919) 707-8238. 

cc: 	 Dexter Matthews, NC DWM 

Jack Butler, NC DWM 

Jim Bateson, NC DWM 

Franklin Hill, US EPA Region 4 

Cathy Amoroso, US EPA Region 4 

1601 Mail Service Cenler, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699·1601 

Phone: 919-707-8600 I lnlernel: hllp:/lportal.nC<lenr.org N~~hCarolina An Equal Cpportun.:ty\AffirmativaAction Emp!oyef- 50% Recycled\ 10% Post Coosuroor Paper ;vaturallu