alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> BD
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,377
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,610
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                             37,713
<PP&E>                                           1,085
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 111,789
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                      25,000
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                              23,973
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            71
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,379
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   111,789
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                3,108
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                             1,820
<COMMISSIONS>                                    7,218
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                    1,412
<FEE-REVENUE>                                    1,539
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 739
<COMPENSATION>                                   7,973
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,769
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         584
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       584
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

DOROTHY MAE ROSS,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No: 15-11674

HON. MARIANNE O. BATTANI 

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC,

ET AL.

 Defendants.

____________________________________/

NOTICE OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

 

You are hereby scheduled to appear on FEBRUARY 24, 2016 at 3:30 p.m. , in the

Courtroom of the Honorable Marianne O. Battani, 277 U.S. Courthouse, 231 W. Lafayette,

Detroit, Michigan, for a scheduling conference on the above case. 

THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE WILL BE AUTOMATICALLY

CANCELLED, AND COUNSEL SHOULD NOT APPEAR, IF THE JOINT

DISCOVERY PLAN IS ELECTRONICALLY FILED PRIOR TO THE

SCHEDULED CONFERENCE DATE. A SCHEDULING ORDER WILL

AUTOMATICALLY BE ISSUED BY THE COURT UPON RECEIPT OF THE

FILED PLAN. 

 PLEASE DO NOT CALL TO CONFIRM THIS PROCEDURE. 

Prior to the date of the scheduling conference, Plaintiff is directed to convene a

meeting with all counsel for the purpose of preparing a joint discovery plan in accordance

with FED.R.CIV.P. 26(f). The joint discovery plan may be submitted to the Court at the

conference or electronically filed as noted below. In the event the parties cannot agree on a plan,

each side must submit a proposed plan at the conference.

Counsel should be prepared to discuss the following during the conference:

1. A brief summary of the case and issues;

2. Subject matter jurisdiction;

3. Relationship, if any, to other cases;

4. Amount of time necessary for the discovery process - generally three to four

months from the date of answer is allowed in the ordinary case;

5. Necessity of amendments to pleadings, additional parties, third-party complaints,

1

2:15-cv-11674-MOB-MJH Doc # 7 Filed 02/04/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 31
expert testimony, et cetera;

6. Anticipated motions;

7. Use of Case Evaluation (see LR 16.3) or other methods of alternate dispute

resolution.

PLEASE NOTE:

CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS: Pursuant to LR 83.4. Counsel should complete and

electronically file, where appropriate, the Disclosure of Corporate Affiliations form.

CASE EVALUATION: If the parties consent to Case Evaluation under LR 16.3, the Consent to

Case Evaluation form must be electronically filed.

DISCOVERY: Counsel should commence the discovery process immediately and not wait for

receipt of the Scheduling Order. Parties are bound by FED.R.CIV.P. 30(d)(2) concerning

depositions and FED.R.CIV.P. 33(a) limiting the number of interrogatories.

PRETRIAL PRACTICES and FORMS:

Required forms and pretrial practices for Judge Battani are available on the District Court

website (copy and paste link below).

http://www.mied.uscourts.gov/index.cfm?pageFunction=chambers&judgeid=1

Date: February 3, 2016 s/Kay Doaks 

Case Manager

 313-234-2627

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

I certify that a copy of this order was served electronically upon all parties of record.

 s/Kay Doaks 

 Case Manager

 

Dated: February 4, 2016 

2

2:15-cv-11674-MOB-MJH Doc # 7 Filed 02/04/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 32
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRAACTED FROM
PCD INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR PERIOD ENDED JUNE 28, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                          21,141
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,195
<ALLOWANCES>                                       234
<INVENTORY>                                      2,911
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,101
<PP&E>                                          10,665
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,131
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,973
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,144
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            59
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,770
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,973
<SALES>                                         13,450
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,450
<CGS>                                            6,990
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,990
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,748
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,248
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,569
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,679
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,679
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2485 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2485

 To amend title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 
1968 to include nongovernmental and volunteer firefighters, ground and 
 air ambulance crew members, and first responders for certain benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2009

Mr. Ellison (for himself, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Mr. Carson of Indiana, 
     Mr. Peterson, Mr. Walz, Mr. Welch, Mr. Tonko, and Ms. Clarke) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 
1968 to include nongovernmental and volunteer firefighters, ground and 
 air ambulance crew members, and first responders for certain benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BENEFITS FOR CERTAIN NONGOVERNMENTAL EMERGENCY SERVICE 
              OFFICERS.

    Section 1204 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796b) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (7) by striking ``employee'' and inserting 
        ``or nongovernmental employee or volunteer''; and
            (2) in paragraph (9)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (B)(ii), by striking ``or'' 
                after the semicolon;
                    (B) in subparagraph (C)(ii), by striking the period 
                at the end and inserting ``; or''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) a nongovernmental employee or volunteer--
                            ``(i) of a fire department, ground or air 
                        ambulance service, or first responder or rescue 
                        squad, which is licensed or recognized by the 
                        State or local government; and
                            ``(ii) who is performing official duties 
                        serving the public in fire suppression, rescue, 
                        or emergency medical and ambulance services.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRIS PLUNKETT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 558 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BILLY MARTIN,

Petitioner,

v.

RANDY HAAS, 

Respondent. 

 /

Case Number: 5:14-CV-14079

HON. JOHN CORBETT O’MEARA

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT

This Court transferred Petitioner Billy Martin’s pro se petition for a writ of habeas

corpus, filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth

Circuit as a successive petition. Now before the Court is Petitioner’s Motion for Relief

from Judgment. 

Petitioner seeks relief from judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4). Rule

60(b)(4) provides for relief in circumstances where the underlying judgment is void. 

Antoine v. Atlas Turner, Inc., 66 F.3d 105, 108 (6th Cir. 1995). “A judgment is void under

60(b)(4) ‘if the court that rendered it lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, or of the

parties, or if it acted in a manner inconsistent with due process of law.’” Id., quoting In

re Edwards, 962 F.2d 641, 644 (6th Cir. 1992). Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that

this Court lacked jurisdiction over his habeas corpus petition or over the parties or that

this court acted in a manner inconsistent with due process. 

5:14-cv-14079-JCO-RSW Doc # 8 Filed 08/07/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 49
Accordingly, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s Motion for Relief from Judgment

(dkt. # 6). 

SO ORDERED. 

s/John Corbett O’Meara 

United States District Judge

Date: August 7, 2015

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties

of record on this date, August 7, 2015, using the ECF system and/or ordinary mail.

s/William Barkholz 

Case Manager

2

5:14-cv-14079-JCO-RSW Doc # 8 Filed 08/07/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 50
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

 

I, Robert M. Little, Jr., certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

/s/ Robert M. Little, Jr.                      

Robert M. Little, Jr.

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Rick Berry, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.      The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.      The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ RICK
BERRY


Rick
Berry


Chief
Financial Officer





November
9, 2010





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sanders Morris Harris
Group Inc. and will be retained by Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

JAMIEL VAUGHN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 15-10907 

OFFICER STEVEN TOWNSEND, 

Defendant. 

 / 

ORDER CANCELLING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

The parties have filed a 26(f) discovery plan, stating: 

The parties have not commenced discovery by any agreement. We recommend 

that the Court enter a general discovery order allowing Plaintiff to obtain discovery 

regarding Officer Townsend’s traffic stop and Garrity Hearing regarding the 

incident. This is a standard case, and thus discovery should be completed by 

September 17, 2015. 

 The court accepts the parties’ suggestion and will enter a scheduling order 

accordingly. The parties also offered that “. . . they are interested in promptly resolving 

this matter. We request that facilitation be conducted to resolve this case.” The court will 

schedule a telephone conference after about 45 days of discovery to further discuss 

facilitation. 

IT IS ORDERED that the April 16, 2015 scheduling conference is CANCELLED. 

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

 ROBERT H. CLELAND 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

2:15-cv-10907-RHC-RSW Doc # 7 Filed 04/14/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 21
Dated: April 14, 2015 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record 

and/or pro se parties on this date, April 14, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. 

 S/Lisa Wagner 

 Case Manager and Deputy Clerk 

 (313) 234-5522 

2:15-cv-10907-RHC-RSW Doc # 7 Filed 04/14/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 22
Exhibit
10.69
 THIRD AMENDMENT TO LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
     EXTENSION.
  FEES AND EXPENSES
  RATIFICATION
  -1-




---



##### 



REAFFIRMATION
  AUTHORITY
    -2-




---



##### 



BORROWERS:
DOVER SADDLERY, INC.
(a Delaware Corporation) /s/  Michael W. Bruns

Witness
    
    By:
    
    /s/    Stephen L. Day

Name:  Stephen L. Day
Title:  its CEO and PresidentDOVER SADDLERY, INC.
(a Massachusetts Corporation)/s/  Michael W. Bruns

Witness
    
    By:
    
    /s/    Stephen L. Day

Name:  Stephen L. Day
Title:  DirectorSMITH BROTHERS, INC./s/  Michael W. Bruns

Witness
    
    By:
    
    /s/    Stephen L. Day

Name:  Stephen L. Day
Title:  DirectorDOVER SADDLERY RETAIL, INC./s/  Michael W. Bruns

Witness
    
    By:
    
    /s/    Stephen L. Day

Name:  Stephen L. Day
Title:  Director
 -3-




---



##### 



OLD DOMINION ENTERPRISES, INC./s/  Michael W. Bruns

Witness
    
    By:
    
    /s/    Stephen L. Day

Name:  Stephen L. Day

Title:  DirectorDOVER SADDLERY DIRECT, INC./s/  Michael W. Bruns

Witness
    
    By:
    
    /s/    Stephen L. Day

Name:  Stephen L. Day
Title:  DirectorLENDER:RBS CITIZENS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONWitness
    
    By:
    
    /s/    Lori A. Chandonnais

Name:  Lori A. Chandonnais 
Title:  Senior Vice President
 -4-
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50135

Conference Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KEITH VERNON HOSTER,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. W-91-CR-168-1

- - - - - - - - - -

(October 18, 1995)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Keith Hoster has appealed the district court's denial of his

motion to reduce his prison term, which he requested on authority

of 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We affirm.

Hoster asserts, based on Amendment 484 to the Sentencing

Guidelines, § 2D1.1, comment. (n.1), that the 110 pounds of

phenylacetic acid should not have been included in the total drug

quantity used to determine his base offense level. He reasons

that acid is not a "drug" but a "chemical," which cannot be

counted because it never was processed into amphetamine. Hoster
No. 95-50135

-2-

asserts that this court's opinion on his direct appeal

erroneously provided a "made up" method to allow such

calculation, in violation of the Guidelines. 

Amendment 484 is not applicable to Hoster's sentence because

the phenylacetic acid was not and was not treated as a "mixture

or substance containing a detectable amount of the controlled

substance," to quote a footnote to the Drug Quantity Table,

U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c). The district court properly considered

Hoster's purchase of phenylacetic acid as relevant conduct. 

U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(a)(2); see United States v. Hoster, 988 F.2d

1374, 1379 (5th Cir. 1993). 

Hoster's contention that this court decided his direct

appeal incorrectly is foreclosed by rules of stare decisis. 

First, a panel of this court may not overrule a prior dispositive

panel decision unless there has been a superseding decision of

the court sitting en banc or of the Supreme Court. United States

v. Crouch, 51 F.3d 480, 483 (5th Cir. 1995). Furthermore, a

panel of this Court will "follow the prior decisions in a case as

the law of that case" unless "(i) the evidence on a subsequent

trial was substantially different, (ii) controlling authority has

since made a contrary decision of the law applicable to such

issues, or (iii) the decision was clearly erroneous and would

work a manifest injustice." Alberti v. Klevenhagen, 46 F.3d

1347, 1351 n.1 (5th Cir. 1995) (citation and quotation marks

omitted). Accordingly, this court will not reexamine any issue

of law which the court determined upon Hoster's direct appeal.

AFFIRMED.
2:15-cv-10677-RHC-MJH Doc # 20 Filed 10/13/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 599
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned  hereby certifies in her capacity as Chief Financial  Officer of
Belcrest Capital Fund LLC (the "Fund"), that:

     (a)  the  Quarterly  Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended
          September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
          of Section 13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
          and

     (b)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  the  results  of
          operations of the Fund for such period.


Dated:  November 14, 2002


                                                    /s/ Michelle A. Alexander
                                                    -------------------------
                                                    Michelle A. Alexander
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
§ 28.855 Electrical distribution systems. ( a ) Each electrical distribution system which has a neutral bus or conductor must have the neutral bus or conductor grounded.
( b ) A grounded electrical distribution system must have only one connection to ground. This ground connection must be at the switchboard.