alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, George L. Ball, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and





2. 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/ GEORGE L. BALLGeorge
      L. BallChief
      Executive Officer





August 9,
2010





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sanders Morris Harris
Group Inc. and will be retained by Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### § 188.10-13 Coast Guard District Commander.

This term means an officer of the Coast Guard designated as such by the Commandant to command all Coast Guard activities within the officer's district, which include the inspections, enforcement, and administration of Subtitle II of Title 46, U.S. Code, Title 46 and Title 33 U.S. Code, and regulations issued under these statutes.

[CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51219, Sept. 30, 1997]
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-225 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION 

Earth Sciences 

 Memorandum of Understanding 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and AUSTRALIA 

Signed at Reston and Sydney 

February 2 and 25, 2009 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 AUSTRALIA 

 Scientific Cooperation: Earth Sciences 

 Memorandum of understanding signed 

 at Reston and Sydney February 2 and 25, 2009; 

 Entered into force February 25, 2009.
- 1 - 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director and 

Associate General Counsel 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

1212 New York Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

202.842.4184 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

December 21, 2011 

via email and regulations.gov 

Esta Rosenberg 

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Notice of Dormancy (Various U.S.-Mexico Routes) 

Dockets DOT-OST-2010-0133, DOT-OST-2010-0196, DOT-OST-2010-0230 

 

Dear Ms. Rosenberg: 

Delta hereby provides notice to the Department that it has ceased own-metal operations on the 

following U.S.-Mexico routes: 

U.S. Point Mexican Point Docket Number Issue Date

Minneapolis/St. Paul Mexico City DOT-OST-2010-0133 5/27/2010

Austin Cancun DOT-OST-2010-0196 8/6/2010

San Antonio Cancun DOT-OST-2010-0196 8/6/2010

Memphis Mexico City DOT-OST-2010-0230 9/14/2010

Delta has no objection to the withdrawal of its own-metal designation on these routes. 

 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

cc: Service List 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 A copy of the foregoing has been served this 21st day of December, 2011 upon the 

following persons via email: 

Carrier Name Email Address 

Alaska Marshall Sinick msinick@ssd.com 

American Carl Nelson carl.nelson@aa.com 

Frontier/Republic Bob Cohn robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com 

Frontier/Republic Pat Rizzi patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com 

JetBlue Jonathan Hill jhill@dowlohnes.com 

JetBlue Robert Land robert.land@jetblue.com 

Southwest/AirTran Bob Kneisley bob.kneisley@wnco.com 

Spirit Airlines David Kirstein dkirstein@yklaw.com 

Spirit Airlines Joanne Young jyoung@yklaw.com 

Sun Country John Fredericksen John.Fredericksen@suncountry.com 

United/Continental Dan Weiss dan.weiss@united.com 

United/Continental Jonathan Linde jonathan.linde@united.com 

United/Continental Steve Morrissey steve.morrissey@united.com 

US Airways Benjamin Slocum benjamin.slocum@usairways.com 

US Airways Howard Kass howard_kass@usairways.com 

USA 3000 Pierre Murphy pmurphy@lopmurphy.com 

Virgin America Barbara Russell barbara.russell@virginamerica.com 

brian.hedberg@dot.gov 

info@airlineinfo.com
# C_2012273EN.01000902.xml

| 8.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/9

---

Order of the General Court of 3 July 2012 — Ghreiwati v Council

(Case T-543/11) (1)

1

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against Syria - Withdrawal from the list of persons concerned - Action for annulment - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 273/15

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Emad Ghreiwati (Al Maliki, Syria) (represented by: P.-F. Gaborit, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M.-M. Joséphidès and B. Driessen, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by S. Bartelt and E. Cujo, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment, first, of Council Regulation (EU) No 878/2011 of 2 September 2011 amending Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2011 L 228, p. 1), and of Council Decision 2011/522/CFSP of 2 September 2011 amending Decision 2011/273/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2011 L 228, p. 16) and, second, of Council Regulation (EU) No 950/2011 of 23 September 2011 amending Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2011 L 247, p. 3), and of Council Decision 2011/628/CFSP of 23 September 2011 amending Decision 2011/273/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2011 L 247, p. 17), in so far as the applicant is named in the list of persons subject to the restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

| 2. | The Council of the European Union is ordered to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Council of the European Union is ordered to pay the costs;

| 3. | The European Commission is ordered to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The European Commission is ordered to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 355, 3.12.2011.

1

---
# C_2013367EN.01001601.xml

| 14.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/16

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 24 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Hannover — Germany) — Samantha Elrick v Bezirksregierung Köln

(Case C-275/12) (1)

1

(Citizenship of the Union - Articles 20 TFEU and 21 TFEU - Right of free movement and residence - National of a Member State - Studies pursued in another Member State - Education or training grant - Conditions - Duration of course greater than or equal to two years - Obtaining a vocational qualification)

2013/C 367/26

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Hannover

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Samantha Elrick

Applicant:

Defendant: Bezirksregierung Köln

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Verwaltungsgericht Hannover — Interpretation of Articles 20 and 21 TFEU — Entitlement to a ‘BAföG’ education or training grant — Member State legislation providing for such entitlement in respect of a certain course, of one year’s duration, pursued in that Member State, but excluding such entitlement for a comparable course pursued in another Member State

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 20 TFEU and 21 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, that makes the award of an education or training grant, to a national resident in that Member State, for a course pursued in another Member State, subject to the requirement that the course in question lead to a vocational qualification equivalent to that provided by a vocational school in the State awarding the grant, following a course of at least two years’ duration, whereas an education or training grant would have been awarded if the national had chosen to undertake, in the State awarding the grant, a course equivalent to that which she wished to pursue in another Member State, and which is of less than two years’ duration.

---

(1)  OJ C 250, 18.8.2012.

1

---
#### Henry C. Rhodes and others, Appellants, *v.*Peter June and others, *Respondents*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Dykman, J., not sitting.
§ 327.20 Admiralty Jurisdiction Extension Claims: Required claims. ( a ) Pursuant to 46 U.S.C. 30101(c) of the Admiralty Extension Act (AEA), administrative claims involving the extension of admiralty jurisdiction to cases of damage or injury on land caused by a Maritime Administration vessel on navigable waters must be presented in writing to the Maritime Administration in accordance with §§ 327.20 through 327.34 prior to institution of a court action thereon.
( b ) A civil action against the United States for injury or damage done or consummated on land by a vessel on navigable waters may not be brought until the earlier occurrence of either the denial of the claim by the Maritime Administration or the presumptive denial of the claim which arises 6 months after the claim has been presented in writing to the Maritime Administration. 46 U.S.C. 30101(c)(2). Note that the 6 month period of review will not begin until a valid claim is filed pursuant to § 327.25.
( c ) Proceedings against the United States pursuant to the requirements of the AEA and these regulations is the exclusive remedy available against the United States of America, acting by and through the Maritime Administration, with respect to such injuries and damages.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,662
<SECURITIES>                                     6,415
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,160
<ALLOWANCES>                                       121
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,051
<PP&E>                                           3,505
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,847
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,477
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           105
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,551
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,265
<SALES>                                          6,860
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,327
<CGS>                                            1,027
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,991
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,361
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 508
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,517)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       183
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,700)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,700)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.65)


</TABLE>
`EX-11



ICY SPLASH FOOD AND BEVERAGE, INC.

STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
              (UNAUDITED)





                                   THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,    NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,

                                          2001             2000             2001              2000
                                      -----------       -----------      -----------       -----------


BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Net profit (loss)                     $     1,060       $   (19,812)      $  (16,117)      $  (52,234)
                                      -----------       -----------      -----------      -----------

Weighted average shares outstanding     6,628,228         6,600,000        6,609,513        6,600,000
                                      -----------       -----------      -----------      -----------

Basic earnings per share              $      --         $      --        $      --        $   (.01)
                                      ===========       ===========      ===========      ===========
Diluted earnings per share:

Net profit (loss)                     $     1,060       $   (19,812)      $  (16,117)      $  (52,234)
                                      -----------       -----------      -----------      -----------
Weighted average and dilutive shares:
 Weighted average shares outstanding    6,628,228         6,600,000        6,609,513        6,600,000
 Dilutive shares
  (Antidilutive in 2001 & 2000)              --                --               --               --
                                      -----------       -----------      -----------      -----------
                                        6,628,228         6,600,000        6,609,513        6,600,000
                                      -----------       -----------      -----------      -----------

Diluted earnings per share            $      --         $      --        $      --        $   (.01)
                                      ===========       ===========      ===========      ===========










10`
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2480 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2480

    To improve the accuracy of fur product labeling, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2009

   Mr. Moran of Virginia (for himself, Mrs. Bono Mack, Mr. Moore of 
Kansas, Mr. Brown of South Carolina, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Cohen, Mr. George 
   Miller of California, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Farr, Mr. McCotter, Mr. 
   Hinchey, Mr. Kucinich, Mr. Sherman, Mr. King of New York, and Mr. 
   Platts) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To improve the accuracy of fur product labeling, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Truth in Fur Labeling Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF EXEMPTION TO FUR PRODUCT LABELING REQUIREMENTS 
              FOR PRODUCTS CONTAINING RELATIVELY SMALL QUANTITIES OR 
              VALUES OF FUR.

    (a) In General.--Section 2(d) of the Fur Products Labeling Act (15 
U.S.C. 69(d)) is amended by striking ``; except that'' and all that 
follows through ``contained therein''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date that is 90 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.

SEC. 3. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION REVIEW OF FUR PRODUCTS NAME GUIDE.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Federal Trade Commission shall publish in the Federal Register 
notice of, and an opportunity to comment on, a review of the Fur 
Products Name Guide (16 C.F.R. 301.0).

SEC. 4. STATE AUTHORITY TO REGULATE LABELING OF FUR PRODUCTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 12 of the Fur Products Labeling Act (15 
U.S.C. 69(j)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``The provisions of'' and inserting ``(a) 
        The provisions of''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Nothing in this Act shall preclude or deny any right of any 
State or political subdivision thereof to adopt or enforce any 
provision of State or local law that provides more restrictive labeling 
requirements for fur products than what is provided for in this Act.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date that is 90 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2422 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 134
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2422

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 16, 2009

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

                             July 30, 2009

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 2300 Scenic Drive in Georgetown, Texas, as the ``Kile G. West Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. KILE G. WEST POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2300 Scenic Drive in Georgetown, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``KileG. West Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Kile G. 
West Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 134

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2422

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 2300 Scenic Drive in Georgetown, Texas, as the ``Kile G. West Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 30, 2009

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### § 308.507 Security for payment of premiums.

Clause 21 of the policy requires the assured to maintain with the Maritime Administrator a collateral deposit fund or a surety bond, to secure the payment of the premiums, in an amount which shall at all times exceed the unpaid premiums on all risks which have attached under the policy. The minimum amount of the fund or of the surety bond shall be $1,000. Clause 21 also provides that, within seven (7) days from the time knowledge comes to the assured that the amount of the deposit or the surety bond is insufficient to meet the requirements of Clause 21, the assured shall deposit additional collateral or increase the surety bond in an amount not less than double the amount of such insufficiency, and for a sum which shall be a multiple of $500. If the assured fails to increase the deposit or the surety bond within the seven (7) day period, the policy automatically becomes void at the end of the seven (7) day period except as to risks which have attached prior to that date. The procedure for establishing a collateral deposit fund is prescribed in § 308.509, and the procedure for posting and maintaining a surety bond is prescribed in § 308.510. An application for the issuance of an open cargo policy shall be ineffective unless a collateral deposit fund is established and maintained, or a surety bond is posted and maintained, in accordance with the provisions of this section and § 308.510.
##### 



(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of and for the period covered by this Report.
 Dated:  May 12, 2006
    By:
    /s/ Mark S. AllioMark S. AllioChairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive OfficerDated:  May 12, 2006
    By:
    /s/ Therese Ann LiutkusTherese Ann Liutkus, CPATreasurer and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 296.4 Waivers.

In General—In special circumstances, and for good cause shown, the procedures prescribed in this part may be waived in writing by the Secretary, by mutual agreement of the Secretary in consultation with the SecDef, and the Contractor, so long as the procedures adopted are consistent with the MSA 2003 and with the objectives of these regulations.
§ 195.11-1 Application. ( a ) The provisions of this subpart shall apply to all vessels.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.135-23 Procedure for approval of design, material, or construction change. ( a ) Each change in design, material, or construction from the plans approved under 46 CFR 159.005-13 and § 160.135-13(h) of this subpart must be approved by the Commandant before being used in any production lifeboat. The manufacturer must submit any such change following the procedures in § 160.135-9 of this subpart, but documentation on items that are unchanged from the plans approved under 46 CFR 159.005-13 and § 160.135-13(h) of this subpart need not be resubmitted.
( b ) Unless determined by the Commandant to be unnecessary, a prototype lifeboat with each change described in paragraph (a) of this section must be made and tested according to the procedures for new approvals in §§ 160.135-9 through 160.135-13 of this subpart.
( c ) Determinations of equivalence of design, construction, and materials will be made by the Commandant only.
#### § 201.185 Effective date and applicability of rules.

The regulations in this part shall become effective October 23, 1964, and shall apply only to cases which are designated for hearing on or after October 23, 1964: *Provided, however,* That the regulations in this part shall be applicable to cases designated for hearing prior to October 23, 1964, if consolidated with a case designated for hearing on or after that date. All other cases designated for hearing prior to October 23, 1964, shall be governed by the rules in effect immediately prior to such date.