alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013108EN.01000802.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/8

---

Order of the Court of 29 November 2012 — Václav Hrbek v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd, formerly The Outdoor Group Ltd

(Case C-42/12 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(1)(b) - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Figurative mark - Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier trade mark - Appeal clearly inadmissible and clearly unfounded)

2013/C 108/15

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Václav Hrbek (represented by: M. Sabatier, avocat)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent), Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd, formerly The Outdoor Group Ltd (represented by: M.S. Malynicz, Barrister)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 November 2011 in Case T-434/10 Hrbek v OHIM — Outdoor Group (ALPINE PRO SPORTSWEAR & EQUIPMENT), by which the General Court of the European Union dismissed the action brought by the appellant against Decision R 1441/2009-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 July 2010, rejecting the action brought against the decision of the opposition division partially refusing registration of the figurative mark comprising the word elements ‘ALPINE PRO SPORTSWEAR & EQUIPMENT’ for goods in Classes 18, 24, 25 and 28 in the context of the opposition made by the holder of the Community figurative mark comprising the word element ‘alpine’ for goods in Classes 18 and 25 — Interpretation and application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Likelihood of confusion

Hrbek

OHIM — Outdoor Group (ALPINE PRO SPORTSWEAR & EQUIPMENT)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Václav Hrbek is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Václav Hrbek is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 31.3.2012.

1

---
**EXHIBIT ITEM 32.2**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

The certification set forth below is being submittedto the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complyingwith Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

March 26, 2008

 

Bruce N. Warner, the Chief FinancialOfficer of Northern California Bancorp, Inc. certifies:

 

i.                              that this annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

ii.                           that information contained annual reporton Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations  of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.

 
|   | /s/ Bruce N. Warner           |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | Bruce  N. Warner              |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  and  |
|   | Principal  Accounting Officer |

#  

----
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2408 

AN ACT 

To expand the research and awareness activities of the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 

Diseases and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention with respect to scleroderma, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2408 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Scleroderma Research 

3 and Awareness Act of 2010’’. 

4 SEC. 2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUS5 CULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES; 

6 SCLERODERMA RESEARCH EXPANSION. 

7 Part B of title IV of the Public Health Service Act 

8 (42 U.S.C. 284 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end 

9 the following: 

10 ‘‘SEC. 409K. SCLERODERMA RESEARCH. 

11 ‘‘The Director of NIH may expand, intensify, and co12 ordinate the activities of the National Institutes of Health 

13 with respect to scleroderma, with particular emphasis on 

14 the following: 

15 ‘‘(1) Research focused on the etiology of 

16 scleroderma and the development of new treatment 

17 options. 

18 ‘‘(2) Clinical research to evaluate new treat19 ments options. 

20 ‘‘(3) Basic research on the relationship between 

21 scleroderma and secondary conditions such as pul22 monary hypertension, gastroparesis, Raynaud’s phe23 nomenon, Sjo ̈gren’s Syndrome, and other diseases as 

24 determined by the Director.’’. 
3 

•HR 2408 EH

1 SEC. 3. PROMOTING PUBLIC AWARENESS OF 

2 SCLERODERMA. 

3 Part P of title III of the Public Health Service Act 

4 (42 U.S.C. 280g et seq.) is amended by adding at the end 

5 the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 399V–5. PROMOTING PUBLIC AWARENESS OF 

7 SCLERODERMA. 

8 ‘‘The Secretary may carry out an educational cam9 paign to increase public awareness of scleroderma. Print, 

10 video, and Web-based materials distributed through this 

11 campaign may include— 

12 ‘‘(1) basic information on scleroderma and its 

13 symptoms; and 

14 ‘‘(2) information on— 

15 ‘‘(A) the incidence and prevalence of 

16 scleroderma; 

17 ‘‘(B) diseases and conditions affiliated with 

18 scleroderma; or 

19 ‘‘(C) the importance of early diagnosis and 

20 treatment of scleroderma.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 30 

(legislative day September 29), 2010. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2408 

AN ACT 

To expand the research and awareness activities of 

scleroderma, and for other purposes. Disease Control and Prevention with respect to skeletal and Skin Diseases and the Centers for the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculo-
Exhibit 23.1











CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT


CERTIFIED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS














We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-83618 on Form S-3D Highlands Bankshares, Inc. of our report dated April 13,
2010 related to the consolidated balance sheets of Highlands Bankshares, Inc.
and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two
years in the period ended December 31, 2009. Such report is included in the
Highlands Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiary 2009 Annual Report to Stockholders,
which is filed as exhibit 13.1 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009.














CERTIFIED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTANTS














Bluefield,
West Virginia


April 13,
2010
§ 24.05-1 Vessels subject to the requirements of this subchapter. ( a ) This subchapter is applicable to all vessels indicated in column 5 of table 2.01-7(a), and is applicable to all such U.S.-flag vessels, and to all such foreign-flag vessels, except as follows: ( 1 ) Any vessel operating exclusively on inland waters which are not navigable waters of the United States.
( 2 ) Any vessel while laid up and dismantled and out of commission.
( 3 ) With the exception of vessels of the U.S. Maritime Administration, any vessel with title vested in the United States and which is used for public purposes.
[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16650, Dec. 30, 1965] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 24.05-1, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
# C_2014052EN.01001202.xml

| 22.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2013 — Telefónica SA v European Commission

(Case C-274/12 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Action for annulment - Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - Right to bring an action - Standing to bring proceedings - Natural or legal persons - Act of individual concern to them - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures - Decision declaring a State aid scheme incompatible with the common market - Right to effective judicial protection)

2014/C 52/19

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Telefónica SA (represented by: J. Ruiz Calzado and J. Domínguez Pérez, abogados, and M. Núñez Müller, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: P. Němečková and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 March 2012 in Case T-228/10 Telefónica v Commission by which the General Court dismissed as inadmissible an action for annulment of Article 1(1) of Commission Decision 2011/5/EC of 28 October 2009 on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions C 45/07 (ex NN 51/07, ex CP 9/07) implemented by Spain (OJ 2011 L 7, p. 48).

Telefónica

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Telefónica SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Telefónica SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 227, 28.7.2012.

1

---
# C_2013147EN.01001603.xml

| 25.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 April 2013 — GRP Security v Court of Auditors

(Case T-87/11) (1)

1

(Arbitration clause - Public service contracts - Surveillance and security services for the buildings of the Court of Auditors - Action for annulment - Decision to unilaterally terminate the contract with application for payment of damages and interest - Measure of a contractual nature - Lack of reclassification of the action - Inadmissibility - Decision to impose a penalty of exclusion for three months - Interest in bringing proceedings - Rights of defence - Serious breach of obligations - Principle that penalties must have a proper legal basis - Misuse of powers - Proportionality)

2013/C 147/28

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: GRP Security (Bertrange, Luxembourg) (represented by: initially by G. Osch, then by C. Arendt and M. Larbi, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Court of Auditors of the European Union (represented by: initially by T. Kennedy, J.-M. Stenier and J. Vermer, then by T. Kennedy and J. Vermer, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, application for annulment of the decision of the Court of Auditors of 14 January 2011 to unilaterally terminate the framework service contract ‘Various security services’ (LOG/2026/10/02) and to apply for payment of damages and interest and, secondly, application for annulment of the decision of 14 January 2011 to impose a penalty of exclusion

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders GRP Security to pay the costs, including those relating to the applications for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders GRP Security to pay the costs, including those relating to the applications for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 120, 16.4.2011.

1

---
### **January 2001:**

# 21st CenturyPreview

**You will needAdobeAcrobat Readerto view these files.**

### Message from theCommandant

## Restoring Readiness: pages2-5

### Page 2

### Page 3

### Page 4

### Page 5

## Deepwater CapabilityReplacement Project: pages 6-11

### Page 6

### Page 7

### Page 8

### Page 9

### Page 10

### Page 11

## Homeland Security: pages12-13

### Page 12

### Page 13

## People: pages 14-19

### Page 14: Standing theWatch

### Page 15

### **Page 16: EnlistedRating Guide**

### **Page17**

### Page 18: Officerinsignia

### Page 19: CWOinsignia

## Coast Guard Missions: pages 20-23

### Page 20

### Page 21

### Page 22

### Page 23

## Coast Guard Inventory: pages 24-30

### Page 24

### Page 25

### Page 26

### Page 27

### Page 28

### Page 29

### Page 30

## Map of Today's Coast Guard: pages 32-33

### Page 32

### Page 33

## Area/District Overviews: pages 34-42

### Atlantic Area - 5thDistrict (p 34)

### 1st District (p35)

### 7th District (p36)

### 8th Distict (p37)

### 9th District (p38)

### Pacific Area - 11thDistrict (p 39)

### 13th District (p40)

### 14th District (p41)

### 17th District (p42)

 

### Organizational Chart(p 43)

 

### Financial information(p 44)

 

### Coast Guard ExecutiveManagement (p 45)

[USCG Home Page]Pleaseprovide questions/comments to US Coast GuardBackto magazine
Número Identificador

RES2024___________________

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico

TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES

PANEL VII

SALVADOR L. ALEMAÑY 

CALDERÓN

Recurrida

v.

METRO GUAYNABO 

DEV, LLC

Peticionaria

KLCE202400089

CERTIORARI

Procedente del 

Tribunal de Primera 

Instancia, Sala 

Superior de 

Bayamón

Caso Núm.:

BY2023CV06955

(401)

Sobre:

DAÑOS Y OTROS

Panel integrado por su presidenta, la Jueza Domínguez Irizarry, la

Jueza Grana Martínez y el Juez Pérez Ocasio.

Grana Martínez, Jueza Ponente

RESOLUCIÓN

En San Juan, Puerto Rico, a 26 febrero de 2024.

El 23 de enero de 2024, Metro Guaynabo Dev, LLC instó el 

presente recurso de certiorari y Urgente moción en auxilio de 

jurisdicción. En el recurso nos solicitó que revisáramos la Orden

emitida por el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de 

Bayamón, del 18 de enero de 2024, y notificada el día 19 del mismo 

mes y año, así como el Mandamiento emitido y notificado el 22 de 

enero de 2024. Mediante el referido dictamen, el foro primario 

ordenó la anotación preventiva de prohibición de enajenar en el 

Registro de la Propiedad sobre cierto inmueble perteneciente a la 

apelante. Ese mismo día, emitimos Resolución en la que declaramos 

ha lugar la moción en auxilio, paralizamos los procedimientos ante 

el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala de Bayamón, y concedimos 

un término de diez (10) días a la parte recurrida para expresarse 

sobre el recurso.

El 22 de febrero del presente año, Metro Guaynabo Dev. LLC

presentó Solicitud de Desistimiento con Perjuicio en el que informa 

que el 21 de febrero de 2024 se presentó un aviso de desistimiento
KLCE202400089 2

con perjuicio en el referido caso, en virtud de la Regla 39.1(a)(1) de 

Procedimiento Civil, 32 LPRA Ap. V. De conformidad, solicita el 

desistimiento del caso con perjuicio.

Habiendo la parte promovente del recurso presentado aviso de 

desistimiento, la controversia presentada ante nuestra 

consideración se ha tornado académica, por lo que ordenamos su 

desestimación de conformidad con la Regla 83(B)(5) del Reglamento

del Tribunal de Apelaciones, 4 LPRA Ap. XXII-B, R. 83.

Lo acordó el Tribunal y lo certifica la Secretaria del Tribunal 

de Apelaciones.

Lcda. Lilia M. Oquendo Solís

Secretaria del Tribunal de Apelaciones
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2477 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2477

   To provide for an extension of the authority of the Secretary of 
   Homeland Security to regulate the security of chemical facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 19, 2009

  Mr. Dent (for himself, Mr. Daniel E. Lungren of California, and Mr. 
   Souder) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for an extension of the authority of the Secretary of 
   Homeland Security to regulate the security of chemical facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chemical Facility Security 
Authorization Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY TO 
              REGULATE THE SECURITY OF CHEMICAL FACILITIES.

    Section 550(b) of the Department of Homeland Security 
Appropriations Act, 2007 (Public Law 109-295; 6 U.S.C. 121 note) is 
amended by striking ``three years after the date of enactment of this 
Act'' and inserting ``on October 1, 2012''.
                                 <all>
```
Form of Letter Agreement



  
 Exhibit 10.9

  
 MERCATOR PARTNERS ACQUISITION CORP. 
  
                     , 2005 
  
 Mercator Capital L.L.C. 
 One Fountain Square, 
 11911 Freedom Drive, Suite 1080, 
 Reston, Virginia 20190 
  
 Gentlemen: 
  
 This letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (“Effective Date”) of the
registration statement for the initial public offering (“IPO”) of the securities of Mercator Partners Acquisition Corp. (“Company”) and continuing until (the “Termination Date”) the earlier of the consummation by the
Company of a “Business Combination” or the distribution of the Company’s “Trust Fund” (as such terms are described in the Company’s IPO prospectus), Mercator Capital L.L.C. shall make available to the Company certain
office and administrative services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at One Fountain Square, 11911 Freedom Drive, Suite 1080, Reston, Virginia 20190. In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay Mercator Capital L.L.C.
the sum of $7,500 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	MERCATOR PARTNERS ACQUISITION CORP.
		
	By:	 	 
	 	 	 Name:

	 	 	 Title:



  

			
	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:
	
	MERCATOR CAPITAL L.L.C.
		
	By:	 	 
	 	 	 Name:

	 	 	 Title:
Case 2:15-cv-12312-MOB-EAS ECF No. 56-13, PageID.1604 Filed 09/23/16 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:15-cv-12312-MOB-EAS ECF No. 56-13, PageID.1605 Filed 09/23/16 Page 2 of 2
PUBLIC LAW 111–215—JULY 30, 2010 124 STAT. 2347 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 3372 (H.R. 5301): 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 111–539 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure) 

accompanying H.R. 5301. 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 111–209 (Comm. on Environment and Public Works). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

July 14, considered and passed Senate. 

July 29, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–215 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To modify the date on which the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 

Agency and applicable States may require permits for discharges from certain 

vessels. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO NORMAL OPERATION OF 

VESSELS. 

Section 2(a) of Public Law 110–299 (33 U.S.C. 1342 note) is 

amended by striking ‘‘during the 2-year period beginning on the 

date of enactment of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘during the period 

beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending 

on December 18, 2013’’. 

Approved July 30, 2010. 

July 30, 2010 

[S. 3372] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

SECTION 302CERTIFICATION

 

I,Bruce N. Warner certify that:

 

1.               I have read this annual report on Form 10-KSBof Northern California Bancorp, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this annual reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for theregistrant and have:

 

d)             designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;

 

e)              evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period(the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

f)                presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee or registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

4.               all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identifiedfor the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

5.               any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significantchanges in internal controls or in other factors that could significantlyaffect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.

 
| Date: March 19, 2004 | /s/ Bruce N. Warner                                         |   |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      | Bruce N. Warner                                             |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer &  Principal Accounting Officer |

 

----
# C_2012174EN.01002303.xml

| 16.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/23

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 23 April 2012 — Hassan v Council

(Case T-572/11 RII)

(Interim relief - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Syria - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Application for interim relief - Fresh application - Absence of new facts - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 174/39

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Samir Hassan (Damas, Syria) (represented by: É. Morgan de Rivery and E. Lagathu, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Kyriakopoulou and M. Vitsentzatos, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for interim relief, in particular an application for suspension of operation of the restrictive measures instituted by the Council against Syria, in so far as those measures affect the applicant.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim relief is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim relief is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---