alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice as required by 42 CFR 83.12(e) of a decision to evaluate a petition to designate a class of employees at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, Richland, Washington, to be included in the Special Exposure Cohort under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. The initial proposed definition for the class being evaluated, subject to revision as warranted by the evaluation, is as follows:

*Facility:*                         Hanford Nuclear Reservation.                    

*Location:*                         Richland,Washington.                    

*Job Title and/or Job Duties:*                         All former Dupont production workers in the 100 area and the 300 area and all 200 area production workers and all guards and construction workers.                    

*Period of Employment:*                         January 1, 1943 through September 1, 1946 for former Dupont production workers in the 100 and 300 areas and December 1, 1944 through September 1, 1946 for all 200 area production workers and all guards and construction workers.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Larry Elliott, Director, Office of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *OCAS@CDC.GOV*.                    

Dated: January 12, 2007.

John Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 07-194 Filed 1-18-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-M
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 1-4, PageID.31 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 1-4, PageID.32 Filed 03/23/15 Page 2 of 2
§ 190.10-20 No means for locking doors. ( a ) No means shall be provided for locking door giving access to either of the two required means of escape except that crash doors or locking devices, capable of being easily forced in an emergency, may be employed provided a permanent and conspicuous notice to this effect is attached to both sides of the door. This paragraph shall not apply to outside doors to deckhouses where such doors are locked by key only and such key is under the control of one of the vessel's officers.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending September 30, 2006

|Filer                      | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                             
|-------------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|MARLBOROUGH BANCSHARES MHC | * 3A1* 3A3    | Application by Marlborough Bancshares, MHC and Marlborough Bancshares, Inc., both of Marlborough, Massachusetts, to become a mutual bank holding company and stock bank holding company, respectively, by acquiring Marlborough Savings Bank, Marlborough, Massachusetts, pursuant to sections 3(a)(1)and 3(a)(3)of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:10/12/2006
|Newspaper:                 | Not available
|Federal Register:          | 10/12/2006   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BRAD C. BOSWELL , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 1107

[ March 17, 2021 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County ; Michael C. Heisey

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 472009CF000171B

.

Brad C. Boswell, Bristol, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Upon review of the record and Ap pellant ’ s brief filed on November 30, 2020, the trial court ’ s order denying Appellant ’ s post

- conviction motion is
affirmed.

Affirmed.

L EVINE
, C

. J., G ERBER and F ORST
, J J., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2008085EN.01000701.xml

| 4.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/7

---

Declaration by the Government of Malta pursuant to Article 5 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community

(2008/C 85/05)

Legislation and schemes as referred to in Article 4(1) and (2) of the Regulation

For the sole and specific purposes of the application of Article 43a and 51a of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, the pensions payable under the following legislation:

| 1. | the Pensions Ordinance (Cap. 393); |
| --- | --- |

1.

the Pensions Ordinance (Cap. 393);

| 2. | the Police Act (Cap. 164); |
| --- | --- |

2.

the Police Act (Cap. 164);

| 3. | the Prisons Act (Cap. 260); |
| --- | --- |

3.

the Prisons Act (Cap. 260);

| 4. | the Malta Armed Forces Act (Cap. 220), |
| --- | --- |

4.

the Malta Armed Forces Act (Cap. 220),

are to be considered as ‘special schemes for civil servants’ within the meaning of Article 1(ja) of the said Regulation.

The inclusion of the above-mentioned pensions within the scope of the Regulation is without prejudice to the definition of such schemes as ‘service pensions’ for the purposes of the application of the Social Security Act (Cap. 318).

---
#### § 30.10-11 Coastwise—TB/C.

Under this designation shall be included all tank vessels normally navigating the waters of any ocean or the Gulf of Mexico 20 nautical miles or less offshore.
# C_2012006EN.01002201.xml

| 7.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/22

---

Action brought on 31 October 2011 — Nycomed v OHIM — Bayer Consumer Care (ALEVIAN DUO)

(Case T-561/11)

2012/C 6/40

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nycomed GmbH (Konstanz, Germany) (represented by: A. Ferchland, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bayer Consumer Care AG (Basel, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 July 2011 in case R 1953/2010-1, and dismiss the opposition; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 July 2011 in case R 1953/2010-1, and dismiss the opposition; and

| — | Order the opponent to bear the costs and fees of both the proceedings before the Opposition Division and the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the opponent to bear the costs and fees of both the proceedings before the Opposition Division and the appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘ALEVIAN DUO’, for goods in class 5 — Community trade mark application No 6303201

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 786863 of the word mark ‘ALEVE’, for goods in class 5

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the decision of the Opposition Division

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal wrongly assessed the existence of likelihood of confusion between the opposing marks.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2012073EN.01001402.xml

| 10.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/14

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 9 November 2011 — Consulta Regionale Ordine Ingegneri della Lombardia and Others v Comune di Pavia

(Case C-564/11)

2012/C 73/25

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Consulta Regionale Ordine Ingegneri della Lombardia, Ordine degli Ingegneri della Provincia di Brescia, Ordine degli Ingegneri della Provincia di Como, Ordine degli Ingegneri della Provincia di Cremona, Ordine degli Ingegneri della Provincia di Lecco, Ordine degli Ingegneri della Provincia di Lodi, Ordine degli Ingegneri della Provincia di Milano, Ordine degli Ingegneri della Provincia di Pavia, Ordine degli Ingegneri della Provincia di Varese

Applicants:

Defendant: Comune di Pavia

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts and, in particular, Article 1(2)(a) and (d), Article 2 and Article 28 thereof and Categories 8 and 12 of Annex II thereto, preclude national legislation under which it is possible for written agreements to be entered into by two awarding authorities for scientific and technical consulting studies and services for the drafting of the measures making up the municipal town and country planning programme, as defined by the national and regional legislation for the sector, the financial consideration for which does not, by definition, represent true remuneration, in so far as the administrative authority responsible for carrying out this task may act as an economic operator?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 13 (Monday, January 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-233]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Transportation and Related Equipment Technical Advisory 
Committee; Notice of Open Meeting

    The Transportation and Related Equipment Technical Advisory 
Committee will meet on February 7, 2007, 9:30 a.m., in the Herbert C. 
Hoover Building, Room 6087B, 14th Street between Pennsylvania & 
Constitution Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the 
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration with 
respect to technical questions that affect the level of export controls 
applicable to transportation and related equipment or technology.

Agenda

    1. Welcome and Introductions.
    2. Regulatory Overview.
    3. Missile Technology Control Regime.
    4. Wassenaar Experts Group Meeting.
    5. Report on Status of Composite Materials Working Group.
    6. Report by AIA on Export Control Reform Proposals.
    7. Presentation of Papers and Comments by Public.
    8. Follow-up on Open Action Items.
    9. Closing Comments.
    The meeting will be open to the public and a limited number of 
seats will be available. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent 
time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the 
Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any time before or 
after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public 
presentation materials to Committee members, the Committee suggests 
that presenters forward the public presentation materials to Yvette 
Springer at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2c755f5c5e45424b495e6c4e455f0248434f024b435a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="94cde7e4e6fdfaf3f1e6d4f6fde7baf0fbf7baf3fbe2">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:  Ms. Springer on (202) 482-2813.

    Dated: January 17, 2007.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-233 Filed 1-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 42 (Monday, March 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1016]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

Sunshine Act Meeting

ACTION: Notice of a Partially Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of 
the Export-Import Bank of the United States

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Time and Place: Thursday, March 8, 2007 at 9:30 a.m. The meeting will 
be held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20571.

Open Agenda Item: Small Business Committee Resolution (Amendment).

Public Participation: The meeting will be open to public participation 
for Item No. 1 only.

Further Information: For further information, contact; Office of the 
Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571 (Telephone 
202-565-3957).

Howard A. Schweitzer,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 07-1016 Filed 3-1-07; 3:07 pm]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
```
#### LOUIS F. BOTJER, PLAINTIFF, v. SHERMAN DENNIS ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Submitted October 13, 1928

Decided March 20, 1929.

Before Justices Teenchabd, Kalisch and Lloyd.

Eor the rule, *Wall, Haight, Carey & Hartpence*and *Slolces, McDermott & Hartshorne.*

*Contra, William B. Stites.*

Pee Cueiam.

This is defendants’ rule to show cause why the venue should not be changed from the county of Hudson, where it laid in the complaint, to the county of Monmouth.

We have examined the depositions taken pursuant to the rule and laid before us. The result of our examination is that we are persuaded that the defendants are entitled to have the case tried in Monmouth county, and for that purpose to have the venue changed to that county.

Accordingly, it will be ordered that the venue be changed to the county of Monmouth.
1 | Page

AYAD LAW, P.L.L.C.

645 Griswold St., Ste. 2202

DETROIT MICHIGAN 48226

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

SOUTHWEST METALS Inc., a 

Michigan corporation, and JOSEPH FAWAZ,

an individual, 

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No.: 15-CV-11080

Hon. Marianne O. Battani

Mag. Anthony P. Patti

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHAEL E. 

DUGGAN, Mayor of Detroit, in his official 

capacity, DETROIT POLICE 

DEPARTMENT, JAMES CRAIG, 

Detroit Police Chief, in his official capacity, 

SGT. REBECCA McKAY in her 

individual and official capacities, KEVIN 

JONES, City of Detroit Business License 

Center Manager, in his official capacity, 

CITY OF DETROIT BUSINESS 

LICENSE CENTER, jointly and 

severally.

Defendants.

AYAD LAW, PLLC CITY OF DETROIT LAW DEPARTMENT

NABIH H. AYAD (P59518) ERIC B. GAABO (P39213)

Attorney for Plaintiffs Attorney for Defendant City of Detroit

645 Griswold St., Ste. 2202 Coleman A. Young Municipal Center

Detroit, MI 48226 2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 500

Phone: (313) 983-4600 Detroit, MI 48226

Fax: (313) 983-4665 (313) 237-5052

Email: nayad@ayadlaw.com gaabe@detroitmi.gov

STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 64, PageID.1103 Filed 01/25/17 Page 1 of 3
2 | Page

AYAD LAW, P.L.L.C.

645 Griswold St., Ste. 2202

DETROIT MICHIGAN 48226

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the 

parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree to the

voluntary dismissal of the above entitled action with prejudice. 

 /s/ Eric Gaabo (w/ consent)_____

Eric Gaabo

Coleman A. Young Municipal Center

2 Woodward Avenue, Suite 500

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 237-5052

E-mail: gaabe@detroitmi.gov

_/s/ Nabih H. Ayad_________

Nabih Ayad

645 Griswold St., Ste. 2202

Detroit, MI 48226

Phone: (313) 983-4600

Fax: (313) 983-4665

Email: nayad@ayadlaw.com 

Dated: January 25, 2017 

Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 64, PageID.1104 Filed 01/25/17 Page 2 of 3
3 | Page

AYAD LAW, P.L.L.C.

645 Griswold St., Ste. 2202

DETROIT MICHIGAN 48226

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on the 25th day of January, 2017, he 

served the foregoing Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice upon all 

parties via the court’s ECF system. 

/s/ Nabih H. Ayad

Nabih H. Ayad

Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 64, PageID.1105 Filed 01/25/17 Page 3 of 3
# C_2014421EN.01000401.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Almer Beheer BV, Daedalus Holding BV v Van den Dungen Vastgoed BV, Oosterhout II BVBA

(Case C-441/12) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Company law - Directive 2003/71/EC - Article 3(1) - Obligation to publish a prospectus when securities are offered for sale to the public - Enforced sale of securities))

2014/C 421/05

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Almer Beheer BV, Daedalus Holding BV

Applicants:

Defendants: Van den Dungen Vastgoed BV, Oosterhout II BVBA

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(1) of Directive 2003/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading and amending Directive 2001/34/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/11/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008, must be interpreted as meaning that the obligation to publish a prospectus prior to any offer of securities to the public is not applicable to an enforced sale of securities, such as that at issue in the main proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 9, 12.1.2013.

1

---
Exhibit 23.2








Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors


Huawei Marine Systems Co., Limited:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-217274, 333-213107, 333-207266 and 333-207470) and on Form S-8 (No. 333-218835 and 333-198727) of HC2 Holdings, Inc. of our report dated April 2, 2018, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of Huawei Marine Systems Co., Limited and its subsidiary as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes, which report appears in the December 31, 2017 annual report on Form 10-K/A of HC2 Holdings, Inc.


Our report dated April 2, 2018 contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the accompanying consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2015 of Huawei Marine Systems Co., Limited were not audited, reviewed, or compiled by us and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on them.





/s/ KPMG Huazhen LLP


Shenzhen, the People’s Republic of China


April 2, 2018