alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2480 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2480

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten

                                 An Act

 
To improve the accuracy of fur product labeling, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Truth in Fur Labeling Act of 2010''.
SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF EXEMPTION TO FUR PRODUCT LABELING REQUIREMENTS 
FOR PRODUCTS CONTAINING RELATIVELY SMALL QUANTITIES OR VALUES OF FUR.
    (a) In General.--Section 2(d) of the Fur Products Labeling Act (15 
U.S.C. 69(d)) is amended by striking ``; except that'' and all that 
follows through ``contained therein''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date that is 90 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
SEC. 3. EXEMPTION FOR DISCRETE SALES BY NON-RETAILERS.
    Section 3 of the Fur Products Labeling Act (15 U.S.C. 69a) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) No provision of this Act shall apply to a fur product--
        ``(1) the fur of which was obtained from an animal through 
    trapping or hunting; and
        ``(2) when sold in a face to face transaction at a place such 
    as a residence, craft fair, or other location used on a temporary 
    or short term basis, by the person who trapped or hunted the 
    animal, where the revenue from the sale of apparel or fur products 
    is not the primary source of income of such person.''.
SEC. 4. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION REVIEW OF FUR PRODUCTS NAME GUIDE.
    Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Federal Trade Commission shall publish in the Federal Register 
notice of, and an opportunity to comment on, a review of the Fur 
Products Name Guide (16 CFR 301.0).
SEC. 5. PAYGO COMPLIANCE.
    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending July 15, 2006

|Filer                         | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                       | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|BRYAN FAMILY MANAGEMENT TRUST | * 3A3          | Bryan Family Management Trust and Bryan Heritage Limited Partnership, both of Bryan, Texas, to acquire additional shares up to 51% of The First National Bank of Bryan, Bryan, Texas. | Newspaper:07/28/2006Federal Register:08/07/2006    
|Newspaper:                    | 07/28/2006    
|Federal Register:             | 08/07/2006    
|PLAINSCAPITAL BANK            | * Branch       | PlainsCapital Bank, Lubbock, Texas, to establish a branch to be located at 150 East Sonterra Boulevard, San Antonio, Texas 78258.                                                     | Newspaper:07/14/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                    | 07/14/2006    
|Federal Register:             | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 91 (Friday, May 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26799-26800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2329]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program, 
Scientific Advisory Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice is published in accordance with Section 10(a)(2) 
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463). The topic of 
the meeting on June 13-14, 2007 are to review new start and continuing 
research and development projects requesting Strategic Environmental 
Research and Development Program funds in excess of $1M. This meeting 
is open to the public. Any interested person may attend, appear before, 
or file statements with the Scientific Advisory Board at the time and 
in the manner permitted by the Board.

DATES: June 13, 2007 from 8:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. and June 14 8:30 a.m. 
to 12:40 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Century House Clarion Hotel, 997 New Loudon Road, Latham, NY 
12110.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Misa Jensen, SERDP Program Office, 
901 North Stuart Street, Suite 303, Arlington, VA or by telephone at 
(703) 696-2126.

[[Page 26800]]

    Dated: May 7, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-2329 Filed 5-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending December 9, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
N. Y. SUPERIOR COURT.

#### Walling agt. The Mayor, &c., of the City of New York.

*Special Term,*

*August,*1875.

*Liability of the corporation of New York to pay expenses for extraditing*„ *fugitive oriminals.*

Tlie city of New York is not liable to third persons, with whom they have no privity of contract, for payment of the expenses incurred in extraditing fugitive criminals from another state, although the bill is approved by the district attorney of the county.

The remedy is against the district attorney, whose duty it is to recover himself against the city, by taking the necessary steps, and furnishing the necessary evidence under the statute.

Demurrer to complaint.

This suit is brought to recover $903.22, the alleged expense • of extraditing two fugitive criminals from California.

Speir, *J*.

The plaintiff was employed by the district attorney to execute a requisition made by the governor of this state upon the governor of the state of California, for the extradition of two fugitive criminals. The district attorney approved the bill as justly due, which amounted to $903.22. The bill was presented to the comptroller for payment, and refused on the ground that, under the law, the district attorney might recover the amount claimed as a charge against the county, but that his employe could not. With some hesitation I think the demurrer should be upheld. The relation of employer and employe does not exist between the plaintiff and defendants. Ho privity of contract between *384them. When the statute under both subdivisions of the third section speaks of “ expenses necessarily incurred,” or *“*moneys necessarily expended ” by the district attorney or any county officer, it clearly contemplates that the county shall have the ^sanction of the official’s oath as to what constitutes the “ necessity ” of the outlay. If this plaintiff has a cause of action it must arise by ordinary contract between him and defendants, and he would not be called upon to prove the necessity of the services performed. The city would be forced to pay any charge made by any person other than its official officers, and consequently without the checks and safeguards contemplated by the law. The remedy is against the , district attorney, whose duty it is, I think, to recover himself against the city, by taking the necessary steps and furnishing the necessary evidence under the statute. Judgment for defendants.
#### § 202.11 Ex parte communications.

Oral or written communications with the Department concerning a matter subject to Secretarial review under section 6.01 of Department Order 117-A, unless otherwise provided by law or by order, rule, or regulation of the Department, shall be deemed ex parte communications and shall not be part of the record and shall not be considered in making any recommendation, decision or action; *Provided, however,* That this rule shall not apply to customary informal communications with Department counsel, including discussions directed toward the development of a stipulation or settlement between parties; communications of a nature deemed proper in proceedings in U.S. Federal courts; and communications with Department counsel which merely inquire as to procedures or the status of a proceeding without discussing issues or expressing points of view. Any written communication subject to the above stated rule received by the Department shall be placed in the correspondence file of the case, which is available for public inspection. If an oral communication subject to the above stated rule is received, a memorandum setting for the substance of the conversation shall be made and placed in the correspondence file.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 78 (Tuesday, April 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2022]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

Availability of Non-Exclusive, Exclusive License or Partially 
Exclusive Licensing of U.S. Patent Concerning Parachute With Skirt 
Reefing System

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 37 CFR part 404.6, announcement is made of 
the availability for licensing of U.S. Patent No. US 7,195,205 B1 
entitled ``Parachute with Skirt Reefing System'' issued March 27, 2007. 
This patent has been assigned to the United States Government as 
represented by the Secretary of the Army.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jeffrey DiTullio at U.S. Army 
Soldier Systems Center, Kansas Street, Natick, MA 01760, Phone: (508) 
233-4184 or E-mail: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Any licenses granted shall comply with 35 
U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR Part 404.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-2022 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
```
Exhibit 5 

2:14-cv-11700-PDB-MJH Doc # 1-6 Filed 04/29/14 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 117
NPI Registry Provider Details

https://npiregistry.cms.hhs.gov/NPPESRegistry/NPIRegistrySearch.do[4/30/2013 8:56:58 AM]

Back to Results

The information for the Organization you selected is displayed. The NPI Registry data was last updated on 04/29/2013.

NOTE: Some health care providers reported SSN or IRS ITIN information in sections of the NPI application that contain

information that is required to be disclosed under FOIA. For example, an incorporated individual may have reported an SSN as

the EIN of the corporation. To protect the privacy of this individual, we have temporarily suppressed the EIN, and we have made

every attempt to locate and remove SSN and IRS ITIN information from being displayed in any of the other information provided

below.

Organization Information:

Organization Name

(LBN): POINTE PHYSICAL THERAPY

EIN: <temporarily suppressed>

Organization Subpart: NO

Authorized Official Information:

Name: GIGI JOHN RPT

Title/Position: PRESIDENT

Phone Number: 5867745006

NPI Information:

NPI: 1285954107

Entity Type: 2-ORGANIZATION

Enumeration Date: 06/02/2010

Last Update Date: 06/02/2010

Replacement NPI:

Deactivation Date:

Reactivation Date:

Provider Business Mailing Address:

Address: 17200 E 10 MILE RD STE 130 

EASTPOINTE, MI 48021-3349

Phone Number: 5867745006

Fax Number:

Provider Business Practice Location Address:

Address: 17200 E 10 MILE RD STE 130 

EASTPOINTE, MI 48021-3349

Phone Number: 5867745006

Home Help

2:14-cv-11700-PDB-MJH Doc # 1-6 Filed 04/29/14 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 118
NPI Registry Provider Details

https://npiregistry.cms.hhs.gov/NPPESRegistry/NPIRegistrySearch.do[4/30/2013 8:56:58 AM]

Primary

Taxonomy Selected Taxonomy State License Number

YES 193400000X Single Specialty Group

111N00000X - CHIROPRACTOR

Issuer Number State Issuer

Fax Number:

Organization Taxonomy:

Other Provider Identifier:

Back to Results

2:14-cv-11700-PDB-MJH Doc # 1-6 Filed 04/29/14 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 119
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2511 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2511

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to require 
 the use of science assessments in the calculation of adequate yearly 
                   progress, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 2009

   Mr. Ehlers (for himself, Mr. Holt, and Mr. Honda) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                                 Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to require 
 the use of science assessments in the calculation of adequate yearly 
                   progress, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Science Accountability Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. SCIENCE ASSESSMENTS AND ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS.

    Section 1111(b) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)(G)(i), by striking ``mathematics and 
        reading or language arts'' and inserting ``mathematics, reading 
        or language arts, and (beginning in the 2010-2011 school year) 
        science''; and
            (2) in paragraph (3)(C)(vii), by striking ``mathematics, 
        and reading or language arts'' and inserting ``mathematics, 
        reading or language arts, and (beginning in the 2011-2012 
        school year) science''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 327.44 Actions by claimant. ( a ) *Form of claim.* The claim should meet the requirements of § 327.44.
( b ) *Presentation.* The claim must be presented in writing to the Office of Chief Counsel, Attn: Chief Counsel, Maritime Administration, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
# C_2013225EN.01005801.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/58

---

Order of the President of the Court of 20 March 2013 — Fruit of the Loom, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Blueshore Management SA

(Case C-392/12) (1)

1

2013/C 225/119

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 355, 17.11.2012.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32

JACKSONVILLE BANCORP, INC.

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Enacted Pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jacksonville
Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
period covered by the Report.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 3, 2012 |  | /s/ Stephen C. Green                 
|                     |  | Stephen C. Green                     
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     | 
|Date: August 3, 2012 |  | /s/ Valerie A. Kendall               
|                     |  | Valerie A. Kendall                   
|                     |  | Executive Vice President             
|                     |  | and Chief Financial Officer          



50
500 New Jersey Avenue, NW

7 th Floor Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 408

- 9494 April 8, 2011

Ms. Gina McCarthy

Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20460

Re: Meeting Request and Response to EPA Memorandum

Dear Ms. McCarthy:

For the past several months, representatives of the Portland Cement Association (PCA) have appreciated the opportunity to meet with you and your staff to discuss PCA’s pending Petition for Reconsideration and Request for Administrative Stay addressing the portland cement

natio nal emission standard for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP). These conversations have been productive and afforded all a better understanding of our respective views and have resulted

in several clarifications and corrections. We are at a critical time w here our mutual discussions have progressed to the point that we urge EPA to make a final decision to grant PCA’s petition for reconsideration and stay, both in light of recent discussions with the Agency that continue to
affirm the vulnerabilities in EPA’ s rulemaking and in light of the upcoming litigation in the D.C. Circuit, where we anticipate briefing will begin shortly. To this end, we respectfully request a meeting with you at the earliest opportunity to bring final resolution to these matters.

In recent weeks, we have worked constructively with EPA staff to convey our views on the interplay between the NESHAP and the commercial and industrial solid waste incinerator (CISWI) rule. These conversations have led to a fruitful exchange of information t hat reaffirm the concerns in our petition. As part of this dialogue, I attach PCA’s preliminary response to the information contained in the memorandum from Keith Barnett dated March 21, 2011 and supporting documents (the “Cold End Memorandum” ), which f urther supports PCA’s petition

for reconsideration.

EPA’s Cold End Memorandum takes the position that “combustion does not occur in the cold end of a cement kiln,” thereby suggesting that only 18 kilns are CISWI units. This unduly narrow interpretation of Section 129(g), compounded by incorrect assumptions regarding the classification of alternative fuels, results in a much larger number of kilns potentially subject to the CISWI rule. In sum, the memorandum does not resolve our concerns and serves only to provide further evidence that the Portland Cement NESHAP must be reconsidered, stayed, and synchronized with reconsideration of the CISWI and solid waste definition rules.2

PCA believes it is time to visit with you to bring PCA’s petition for reconsidera tion and stay to closure in light of these recent developments and upcoming court action. I may be reached at (202) 408

- 9494 or aohare@cement.org to discuss arrangements for a meeting.

Sincerely,

Andrew T. O’Hare Vice President, Regulatory Affairs

cc: Peter Tsirigotis, EPA Steven Silverman, EPA Keith Barnett, EPA Daniel Dertke, DOJ
Exhibit 99.02


        Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
                   Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I,  the
undersigned  Chief  Financial Officer of  Pop  N  Go,  Inc.  (the
"Company"),  hereby  certify, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the
Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-Q of the Company  for  the  quarter
ended  June  30,  2002  (the "Report") fully  complies  with  the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange  Act  of
1934   and  that  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.


By:   /s/ Melvin Wyman
          ---------------
          Melvin Wyman
          Chief Financial Officer

Date:     August 15, 2002