alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 3.2



Ross Miller
Secretary of State
202 North Carson Street, Suite 1
Carson City, Nevada 89701-4299
(775) 684 5708
Website: secretaryofstate.biz




Certificate of Amendment

(PURSUANT TO NRS 78.385 and 78.390)Use Black Ink Only  DO NOT HIGHLIGHT
     ABOVE SPACE IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLYCertificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
For Nevada Profit Corporations
(Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After Issuance of Stock)1. Name of corporation:Octillion Corp.2. The articles have been amended as follows (provide article numbers, if available):
A.  Article I is amended to read as follows in its entirety:

The name of the Corporation is New Energy Technologies, Inc. (the Corporation).3.   The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such greater proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote by classes or series, or as may be required by the provisions of the  articles of incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is:  51.8%4. Effective date of filing (optional): 12/17/085. Officer Signature (required):

/X/Meetesh Patel
Signature of Officer






*If any proposed amendment would alter or change any preference or any relative or other right given to any class or series of outstanding shares, then the amendment must be approved by the vote, in addition to the affirmative vote otherwise required, of the holders of shares representing a majority of the voting power of each class or series affected by the amendment regardless of limitations or restrictions on the voting power thereof.IMPORTANT:Failure to include any of the above information and submit the proper fees may cause this filing to be rejected.This form must be accompanied by appropriate fees.
     Nevada Secretary of State Profit
Revised :  7-1-08






1

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NetSolve, Incorporated (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David D. Hood, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David D. HoodName: David D. Hood Title: President and Chief Executive Officer




September 9, 2003



*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1185246
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1359424
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2544670
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2344670
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                      199800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2544670
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Skip to main content

National Institutes of Health

sML

        - Home
        - Health Info
        - Research
        - Funding
        - News & Events
        - About Us
        - A–Z Index

HomeHealth InfoHearing, Ear Infections, and DeafnessMore About Cochlear Implants

# More About Cochlear Implants 

            - Print this page
            - Order free publications
            - Find other organizations

## Related Topics:

          - Cochlear Implants 
          - American Sign Language 
          - Cochlear Implants in Adults and Children, Consensus Statement 
          - Communication Considerations for Parents of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children 
          - Risk of Bacterial Meningitis in Children with Cochlear Implants 
          - VideoCast — Cochlear Implants: Past, Present, and Future 
          - Why NIDCD Does Research: Helping People with Hearing Loss (video) 

## Also Available In:

          - Spanish
§ 28.870 Emergency source of electrical power. ( a ) The following electrical loads must be connected to an independent emergency source of power capable of supplying all connected loads continuously for at least three hours: ( 1 ) Navigation lights;
( 2 ) Fire protection and detection systems;
( 3 ) Communications equipment;
( 4 ) General alarm system; and
( 5 ) Emergency lighting;
( b ) The emergency power source must be aft of the collision bulkhead, outside of the machinery space, and above the uppermost continuous deck.
( c ) An emergency source of power supplied solely by storage battery must also meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) Each battery must be a lead-acid or alkaline type and be able to withstand vessel pitch, vibration, roll, and exposure to a salt water atmosphere;
( 2 ) A battery cell must not spill electrolyte when the battery is inclined at 30 degrees from the vertical;
( 3 ) Each battery installation must be in a battery room, in a box on dock, or in a well ventilated compartment. The batteries must be protected from falling objects;
( 4 ) Each battery tray must be secured to prevent shifting with the roll and pitch of the vessel and lined with a material that is corrosion resistant to the electrolyte of the battery;
( 5 ) Each battery bank installation must be fitted with its own drip-proof charging system; and
( 6 ) Each deck box used for battery storage must be weathertight, and have holes near the top to allow gas to escape.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan



### January 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 

### 132376 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 132376 COA: 269176 Kent CC: 00-011664-FC ANTONIO GARCIA-DORANTES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 11, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

p0122 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 29, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NetSolve, Incorporated (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David D. Hood, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    DAVID D. HOODName: Title:

David D. Hood President and Chief Executive Officer




November 14, 2003



|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
128123 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 128123 COA: 250683 Wayne CC: 03-001006-01 JAMES CALVIN SISTRUNK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to app eal the February 10, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0123 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 30, 2006

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 78 (Tuesday, April 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2038]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Pediatric Clinical Trial.
    Date: April 27, 2007.
    Time: 3 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Patricia A. Haggerty, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7194, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 
301-435-0288, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c4aca5a3a3a1b6b0b484aaaca8a6adeaaaadaceaa3abb2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7c141d1b1b190e080c3c1214101e1552121514521b130a">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 83.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 16, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2038 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending March 10, 2007

----

Bank Holding CompaniesIndustrial Bank of Taiwan Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan, and IBT Holdings Corp., Cerritos, California  -- to become bank holding companies and to acquire EverTrust Bank, City of Industry.					-Approved, March 9, 2007 					

EnforcementBanco de la Nacion Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina, and its New York branch  -- written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the New York State Banking Department.					-Announced, March 6, 2007 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: March 15, 2007
#### § 194.10-35 Labeling.

(a) Labeling shall be in 3-inch block type lettering. Letters shall be red or white, whichever provides the better contrast against the background. On small chests the labeling size may be reduced to that consistent with the size of the chest so that the inscription may be placed in its entirety on the side or top.

(b) The access door to magazines and magazine vans shall bear the inscription:

### MAGAZINE

### KEEP OPEN LIGHTS AND FIRE AWAY

### KEEP DOOR CLOSED

### REMOVE MATCHES AND LIGHTERS PRIOR TO ENTERING

(c) Magazine chests shall be marked in a conspicuous location, preferably the top, with the inscription:

### MAGAZINE CHEST

### KEEP OPEN LIGHTS AND FIRE AWAY

(d) Magazine chests used for blasting caps, detonators, or boosters shall be marked in a conspicuous location with the inscription as appropriate:

### BLASTING CAP LOCKER

or

### DETONATOR LOCKER

or

### BOOSTER LOCKER

### KEEP OPEN LIGHTS AND FIRE AWAY

(e) Magazine van, unless specifically approved as a portable magazine under provisions of 49 CFR 176.137 shall bear the additional statements on each side:

### MAGAZINE

### WARNING

### DO NOT LIFT WITH CONTENTS

(f) Control locations for magazine sprinkler systems, in addition to the operating instructions required by § 76.20-20 of Subchapter H (Passenger Vessels) of this chapter shall bear the inscription:

### MAGAZINE SPRINKLER CONTROL

[CGFR 67-83, 33 FR 1151, Jan. 27, 1968, as amended by CGD 86-033, 53 FR 36027, Sept. 16, 1988; CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51051, Sept. 30, 1997]
# C_2014175EN.01003302.xml

| 10.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/33

---

Order of the President of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of 7 February 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove — Slovakia) — SKP k.s. v Ján Bríla

(Case C-460/12) (1)

1

2014/C 175/42

Language of the case: Slovak

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 46, 16. 2. 2013.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.7

Voyager One, Inc.
859 West End Court - Suite I
Vernon Hills, IL 60061
Phone: (847) 984-6200
Fax: (847) 984-6201

December 31, 2004                                       HAND DELIVERED
                                                        --------------

Mr. John Lichter
President/CEO
Quest Manufacturing, Inc.
2503 Spring Ridge Drive
Unit F
P.O. Box 430
Spring Grove, IL  60081

RE:  Repayment of proceeds pursuant to Asset Purchase Agreement

Dear Mr. Lichter:

Pursuant to Paragraph 5(b)(2) of the Asset Purchase Agreement between Quest
Manufacturing, Inc. and Silicon Film Technologies, Incorporated, dated February
1, 2003, the outstanding balance of $305,000 is to be payable to Quest
Manufacturing, Inc no later than December 31, 2004. This unpaid balance has
accrued interest at 6% per annum. This will confirm that you have agreed, on
behalf of Quest Manufacturing, Inc. to extend the payment date to March 31,
2005. The outstanding balance will continue to accrue interest at the rate of
six percent (6%) per annum. Please confirm this agreement by signing and dating
this letter below.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Sebastien C. DuFort

Sebastien DuFort
President
Voyager One, Inc.

I, John Lichter, President and CEO of Quest Manufacturing, Inc., hereby confirm
that I have extended the payment due date of outstanding funds of $305,000 plus
interest as indicated above to March 31, 2005

 12/31/04                    /s/ John Lichter
----------------            -----------------------------
Date                                John Lichter
                                    President/CEO
                                    Quest Manufacturing

SD/cap
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

VICKIE WALLACE,

 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 15-11839

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

 /

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the court’s “Opinion and Order (1) Overruling Plaintiff’s

Objections; (2) Adopting the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation; (3)

Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment; and (4) Granting Defendant’s Motion

for Summary Judgment” dated August 19, 2016,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of

Defendant Commissioner of Social Security and against Plaintiff Vickie Wallace. Dated

at Detroit, Michigan, this 19th day of August 2016.

 DAVID J. WEAVER

 CLERK OF THE COURT

S/ Lisa Wagner 

By: Lisa Wagner, Case Manager

 to Judge Robert H. Cleland

2:15-cv-11839-RHC-APP Doc # 19 Filed 08/19/16 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 557
§ 28.565 Water on deck. ( a ) Each vessel with bulwarks must comply with the requirements of this section.
( b ) Except for a vessel that operates on protected waters, the residual righting energy, “b” in Figure 28.565, must not be less than the water on deck heeling energy, “a” in Figure 28.565.
( c ) The water on deck heeling energy must be determined assuming the following: ( 1 ) The deck well is filled to the top of the bulwark at its lowest point and the vessel heeled to the angle at which this point is immersed;
( 2 ) Water does not run off through the freeing ports;
( 3 ) Vessel trim and displacement are constant and equal to the values of the vessel without the water on deck; and
( 4 ) Water in the well is free to run-off over the top of the bulwark.
( d ) The residual righting energy is the righting energy from the value where the righting arm equals the water on deck heeling arm up to the lesser of the values of 40° (0.70 radians) of heel or the downflooding angle.
§ 195.09-1 Application. ( a ) The provisions of this subpart shall apply to all vessels.
#### Joseph E. Tyler, *Appellant,*v. Oliver P. Rose, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinions by

Learned, P. J., and Boardman, J.;

Bookes, J., dissenting.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 30, 2020

No. 04-19-00721-CV

Rufina Reyes YANEZ,

Appellant

v.

AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CVK001146D3

Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The appellant’s brief was originally due February 14, 2020. This court has granted 

appellant several extensions to file the appellant’s brief. Our order on the appellant’s last motion 

advised counsel that no further extensions would be granted without a timely motion that (1) 

demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the 

efforts counsel has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable 

assurance that the brief will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline. 

Appellant’s motion states counsel is self-quarantined after being exposed to COVID-19. 

Although the motion demonstrates extraordinary circumstances, the motion fails to advise the 

court of counsel’s efforts to complete appellant’s brief, and to reasonably assure the court the 

brief will be completed by the requested extended deadline given counsel’s circumstances. 

Appellant’s motion also fails to contain a certificate of conference stating “the filing 

party conferred, or made a reasonable attempt to confer, with all other parties about the merits of 

the motion and whether those parties oppose the motion” and to identify “the number of previous 

extensions granted regarding the item in question.” See Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.5(b)(1).

We therefore take no action on appellant’s motion at this time. Instead, we ORDER

appellant to file a supplemental or amended motion satisfying the above-mentioned requirements 

within 10 days of this order.
_______________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of April, 2020.

______________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court