alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
              32.2**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
              PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF
              THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C SECTION 1350)**
 
 
 The
              undersigned, as the Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
              of Matria
              Healthcare, Inc., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and
              belief, the
              Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006,
              which
              accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements
              of Section
              13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained
              in
              the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
              financial
              condition and results of operations of Matria Healthcare, Inc. at the
              dates and
              for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant
              to
              Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)
              and shall
              not be relied upon for any other purpose.
 
 This
              20 th day of
              March 2007.
 
 
 /s/
              Jeffrey L. Hinton
 Jeffrey
              L. Hinton
 Senior
              Vice-President and
 Chief
              Financial Officer
 
 
 
 
 
 A
              signed
              original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
              document
              authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
              that appears
              in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
              required
              by Section 906, has been provided to Matria Healthcare, Inc. and will
              be
              retained by Matria Healthcare, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
              and Exchange
              Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 The
              information in this Exhibit 32.2 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
              Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor
              shall it be
              deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities
              Act of 1933,
              except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such
              filing.
#### Brown v. Brown.

Appeal by plaintiff from an order at special term, opening a judgment.

The action was brought by Charlotte E. Brown against Henry Brown for a divorce.

*Chas. W. Dayton,*for appellant.

*H. F. Anderson,*for respondent.

Barnard, P. J.

The order was reversed on the ground that the proof on which judgment was obtained was sufficient to sustain it, and that the moving papers did not show a sufficient excuse for the default.

*Order reversed.*
Order entered May 31, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01437-CR

No. 05-18-01438-CR

No. 05-18-01439-CR

No. 05-18-01440-CR

No. 05-18-01441-CR

No. 05-18-01442-CR

No. 05-18-01443-CR

No. 05-18-01444-CR

DANIEL BARRY STEFFEN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 199-83863-2017. 199-83864-2017, 199-83865-2017,

199-83866-2017, 199-83867-2017, 199-83868-2017, 199-83869-2017 & 199-84131-2017

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s May 17, 2019 second motion to extend the time to file 

appellant’s brief. We GRANT IN PART the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed on or 

before June 17, 2019. If appellant’s brief is not filed by June 17, 2019, these appeals may be 

abated for the trial court to make findings in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 38.8.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-4265 

___________

Gabriel Chehadeh; Chedco *

Development, Inc., a Minnesota *

corporation, *

*

Plaintiffs, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Roffe Containers, Inc., a dissolved *

Minnesota corporation; David Thomas, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Defendants-Appellees, *

*

Jerry Aamot, *

*

Defendant-Appellant, *

*

George Corbey; Donald Scott; *

Aamot/Thomas Partnership, a *

Minnesota partnership, *

*

Defendants-Appellees. *

*

___________

Submitted: November 20, 1997

Filed: December 12, 1997

___________

Before BEAM, HEANEY, and BRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

___________
The Honorable Jonathan Lebedoff, United States Magistrate Judge for the

1

District of Minnesota, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent

of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-

PER CURIAM.

Jerry Aamot appeals from the district court's order which compelled Aamot to 1

transfer his entire interest in Roffe Container, Inc., (Roffe) to Roffe for $179,806.00,

less the $40,000 in attorney fees and costs awarded Roffe; compelled Aamot to return

all sums paid by Chedco Development, Inc., pursuant to a purported stock transfer

agreement; and dismissed Aamot's remaining claims.

After carefully reviewing the record and the parties' submissions, we conclude

that the district court did not err. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

 ATTEST:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF THE JPM COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
     IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BE REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         969
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  21,755
<ALLOWANCES>                                   358
<INVENTORY>                                    37,227
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               65,753
<PP&E>                                         31,164
<DEPRECIATION>                                 11,389
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 124,560
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          29,461
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     38,873
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   124,560
<SALES>                                        166,314
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               166,314
<CGS>                                          138,512
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  138,512
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               178
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               101
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,912
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                8,978
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,245
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            5,296
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   5,296
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .70


</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JENNIFER ELIZABETH DIAZMARTINEZ, 

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 15-71114

Agency No. A076-359-558

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 13, 2016**

Before: FARRIS, TALLMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Jennifer Elizabeth Diaz-Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions 

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, 

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 18 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-71114

(“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for 

substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 

1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008), and review de novo due process contentions, 

Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir. 2008). We dismiss in 

part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Diaz-Martinez’s contentions as to the 

agency’s finding that she was convicted of a particularly serious crime because she 

did not exhaust them before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-

78 (9th Cir. 2004). We therefore dismiss the petition as to Diaz-Martinez’s 

asylum and withholding of removal claims.

Similarly, we lack jurisdiction to consider Diaz-Martinez’s ineffective

assistance of counsel claim because she did not exhaust it in the form of a motion 

to reopen before the BIA. See Ontiveros-Lopez v. INS, 213 F.3d 1121, 1124 (9th 

Cir. 2000) (“We . . . require an alien who argues ineffective assistance of counsel 

to exhaust his administrative remedies by first presenting the issue to the BIA.”); 

Puga v. Chertoff, 488 F.3d 812, 815-16 (9th Cir. 2007) (acknowledging a motion 

to reopen is not a remedy as of right, and requiring administrative exhaustion of an 

ineffective assistance of counsel claim).
3 15-71114

Finally, substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of DiazMartinez’s CAT claim because she failed to establish it is more likely than not she 

would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if 

returned to Mexico. See Silaya, 524 F.3d at 1073. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
§ 32.40-35 Hospital space—T/ALL. ( a ) Each vessel which in the ordinary course of its trade makes voyages of more than 3 days duration between ports and which carries a crew of 12 or more, must be provided with a hospital space. This space must be situated with due regard to the comfort of the sick so that they may receive proper attention in all weathers.
( b ) The hospital must be suitably separated from other spaces and must be used for the care of the sick and for no other purpose.
( c ) The hospital must be fitted with berths in the ratio of 1 berth to every 12 members of the crew or portion thereof who are not berthed in single occupancy rooms, but the number of berths need not exceed 6.
( d ) The hospital must have a toilet, washbasin, and bathtub or shower conveniently situated. Other necessary suitable equipment such as a clothes locker, a table, and a seat must be provided.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2415 

To require the Federal Government to use purchases of goods or services 

through the Federal supply schedules for the purpose of meeting certain 

contracting goals for participation by small business concerns owned 

and controlled by service-disabled veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2009 

Mr. ADLER of New Jersey (for himself and Mr. LANCE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Government to use purchases of 

goods or services through the Federal supply schedules 

for the purpose of meeting certain contracting goals for 

participation by small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2415 IH

1 SECTION 1. USE OF FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULES BY FED2 ERAL GOVERNMENT TO MEET CONTRACTING 

3 GOALS FOR PARTICIPATION BY SMALL BUSI4 NESS CONCERNS OWNED AND CONTROLLED 

5 BY SERVICE-DISABLED VETERANS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Office of Federal Procure7 ment Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 401 et seq.) is amended by 

8 adding at the end the following new section: 

9 ‘‘SEC. 45. FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULES. 

10 ‘‘Notwithstanding any law or regulation relating to 

11 the Federal supply schedules of the General Services Ad12 ministration, a contracting officer of an executive agency 

13 shall use purchases of goods or services through the Fed14 eral supply schedules for a fiscal year for the purpose of 

15 meeting the Government-wide goal for that fiscal year 

16 under section 15(g)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 

17 U.S.C. 644(g)(1)) for participation by small business con18 cerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans.’’. 

19 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

20 in section 1(b) of such Act is amended by adding at the 

21 end the following new item: 

‘‘45. Federal supply schedules.’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 99.11

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report of Cameco Corporation (the Company) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tim Gitzel, President &
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |     |  |                |  |                                      
| |  | --- |  | -------------- |  | -------------------------------------
| |  | By: |  | /s/ Tim Gitzel
| |  |     |  | Name:          |  | Tim Gitzel                           
| |  |     |  | Title:         |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

February 22, 2013
SUPPLEMENT
    NO. 1 TO CONFIDENTIAL
    PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUMDATED
    OCTOBER 2007   The Confidential Private Placement Memorandum of Fusion Telecommunications International, Inc. (the "Company") dated October, 2007 (the "Memorandum") is supplemented as hereinafter set forth. Defined terms in this Supplement have the meanings ascribed to them in the Memorandum.  Proceeds Received As
    of December 7, 2007, the initial termination date of the offering described
    in the Memorandum, the Cornpany had sold 2,936,321 Shares (and Warrants to
    purchase 1,468,161 Shares), and received gross proceeds from such sales of
    $1,475,000. The Company then elected to extend the Offering and sold an additional
    5,855,173 Shares (and Warrants to purchase 2,927,590 Shares), and received
    additional gross proceeds of $1,788,000.  Extension
    of Offering Period In order to provide us with necessary working capital, the Company has determined to further extend the Offering Period of the Offering described in the Memorandum to the earlier to occur of (i) the determination by the Company to terminate the Offering Period, (ii) the sale of all Shares covered by the Memorandum, (iii) June 30, 2008.  Issuance
    of Shares Subject to AMEX Listing Approval  The issuance of additional Shares in this Offering, including Shares issuable on exercise of the Warrants, is subject to receipt of listing approval by the American Stock Exchange.  Recent Events On
    or about April 18, 2008, we borrowed an aggregate of $300,000 from our Chairman
    ($150,000) and our Treasurer ($150,000), to provide us with additional working
    capital. Repayment of the loans, which mature on May 18, 2008 and bear interest
    at the rate of 10% per annum, is secured by the receivables of the Company.  Additional Information A copy of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, is attached as an exhibit hereto.   Other Information



  SectionFof the Subscription Rights Agreement
    is hereby modified to reflect that any and all notices to the Company should
    be copied to Schneider Weinberger&Beilly
    LLP, 2200 Corporate Blvd., N.W., Suite 210, Boca Raton, Florida 33431,Attn:Steven I. Weinberger, Esq.



ThisSupplement should be readinconjunction with and shall become a part of the Memorandum. Except as modified hereby, all of the terms and conditions of the Memorandum remain in full force and effect.



  The
    date of this Supplement is April 18, 2008
# C_2011252EN.01005805.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/58

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 17 June 2011 — Nieminen v Council

(Case F-8/11) (1)

1

2011/C 252/134

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 26.3.2011, p. 14.

1

---
#### MICHAEL GRAMS, PLAINTIFF, v. STERN BROTHERS, INCORPORATED, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.

Submitted October 13, 1928

Decided March 20, 1929.

Before Justices Trenchard, Kalisch and Lloyd.

For the rule, *John W. Lyness*and *Edward A. MarTcley.*

*Contra, Walter L. Glenney (Edwin F. Smith*and *Raymond Dawson,*of counsel).

Per Curiam.

This case was tried at the Middlesex Circuit, the jury returning a verdict against the defendant in favor of the plaintiff for $500.

The plaintiff obtained this rule to show cause why that verdict should not be set aside as inadequate, and the only question argued here is whether or not the verdict is inadequate.

The action was for personal injuries to the plaintiff alleged to have been caused by the negligence of a servant of the defendant in the operation of an automobile which struck the plaintiff. The accident occurred September 1st, 1927, while the plaintiff was attempting to cross Bound Brook road, in the borough of Middlesex in Middlesex county.

We have examined with care the testimony in relation to damages. It would serve no useful purpose to set it forth in detail. Our conclusion is that we cannot say that the verdict is so small as to justify us in saying that it is inadequate.

The rule to show cause will be discharged.
#### Libertus Van Bokkelein, Respondent, *v.*Myron H. Mills, Appellant.

Motion for reargument and for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied.

Smith, J., not participating in the decision.
2:15-cv-11572-PDB-RSW Doc # 8 Filed 03/02/16 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 52
2:15-cv-11572-PDB-RSW Doc # 8 Filed 03/02/16 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 53
2:15-cv-11572-PDB-RSW Doc # 8 Filed 03/02/16 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 54
STA TE OF TEXAS 

## vs . JO LYNN MURPHY N O . 1 2· 1 5 ·00092- C R § INTHE § § TWELFTH C OU RT § § OF APPEALS
MOTIO N TO DISMISS APP E AL T O THE HONORABLE JUSTI CE S OF SAID COURT: Now comes JO L YNN MU RPHY , Appellant in the above s tyled and numbered
case, before the decision in this Court has bee n de li ver ed, and respectfully move s this Court to withdraw appellant' s notice of appeal and di s mi ss this appeal, p u rsuant to Rule 42.2 of t h e T exas Ru l es of Appellate Procedure

. Respectf ull y s u bmi tte d,
Law Office of Jame s Huggler 100 

### E. Ferguson, Suite 805 T y ler , Texa s 75702 Te l: (903) 593·2400 Fax : (903) 593·3830 ACCEPTED 12-15-00092-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 4/22/2015 4:39:40 PM CATHY LUSK CLERKCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify t h at on April 21, 2015, a true and correct co p y of the above and foregoing document was se rv ed on the District Attorney's Office, Smith County, 100 N. Broadway , 4th Floor, Tyler, Texas 75702, by h a nd delivery

.STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF SMITH § § §
AFFIDAVIT BEFORE ME , the undersign e d authority , on this day per so nally a ppear e d Jam es Huggl e r, who afte r being duly s worn sta ted: "I am t he attorney for the appella n t in the above numbered and entitled cau se. I h ave read the foregoing Motion to Dismiss Appea l a nd swear that all of the allegations of fact contained therein are true an d correct."

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME on Apr il 21, 2014, to certify which witness my h a nd and seal of office.**,, ,,** **;:;: ''** **,** AM I E JANE GONZA LEZ**.,~ :-::J(;;** **:-;** N o t ary Pub l ic

. Sta t e of T exas ;._ ..;;

..**~/ !**  M y Comm i ss i on Exp i res ·**--.. :,** **~f i\** **~~ "**  Ju l y 1 9

. 20 1 8 ' " "' Notary Public, State ofT
§ 180.25 Additional requirements. ( a ) Each item of lifesaving equipment carried on board a vessel but not required under this part, must be approved by the Commandant.
( b ) The cognizant Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI) may require a vessel to carry specialized or additional lifesaving equipment if: ( 1 ) The OCMI determines the conditions of the voyage render the requirements of this part inadequate; or
( 2 ) The vessel is operated in Arctic, Antarctic, or other severe conditions not covered under this part.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Henry R. Carabelli, President and Chief Executive Officer of Pac-West Telecomm, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



1. The Company's Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 15th day of August, 2003.







|/s/Henry R.Carabelli
Henry R. Carabelli
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2288 

To amend Public Law 106–392 to maintain annual base funding for the 

Upper Colorado and San Juan fish recovery programs through fiscal 

year 2023. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2009 

Mr. SALAZAR (for himself, Ms. MARKEY of Colorado, Mr. LUJA ́N, Ms. 

DEGETTE, Mr. HEINRICH, Mr. POLIS of Colorado, Mrs. LUMMIS, and 

Mr. TEAGUE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend Public Law 106–392 to maintain annual base 

funding for the Upper Colorado and San Juan fish recovery programs through fiscal year 2023. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Endangered Fish Re5 covery Programs Improvement Act of 2009’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2288 IH

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF FISH RECOVERY PRO2 GRAMS. 

3 Section 3 of Public Law 106–392 (114 Stat. 1602) 

4 is amended in subsection (d)(2) in the fourth sentence, 

5 by striking ‘‘2011’’ and inserting ‘‘2023’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS