alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 90 (Thursday, May 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2315]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration


Environmental Impact Statement: Greene County, PA

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Cancellation of the Notice of Intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice rescinds the previous Notice of Intent (issued 
November 28, 1994) to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for 
improvements of a portion of U.S. Route 19 (U.W. 19) in Franklin 
Township, Greene County, Pennsylvania.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David W. Cough, P.E., Director of 
Operations, Federal Highway Administration, Pennsylvania Divsion 
Office, 228 Walnut Street, Room 508, Harrisburg, PA 17101-1720, 
Telephone (717) 221-3411--OR--R. Alan Bailey, P.E., Assistant District 
Executive, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, District 12-0, 
825 North Gallatin Avenue Extension, Uniontown, PA 15401, Telephone 
(724) 439-7259.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional public meetings and environmental 
analyses have indicated that all project alternatives can be down-
scoped with little or no significant impact to the environment. An 
Environmental Assessment will be pursued, based on a revised project 
scoping.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, 
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing 
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on 
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)

    Dated: May 3, 2007.
James A. Cheatham,
FHWA Division Administrator, Harrisburg, PA.
[FR Doc. 07-2315 Filed 5-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-M
Exhibit 21 - Subsidiaries of Affinity Technology Group, Inc.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                        <C>                                 <C>
         Name                               Jurisdiction of Incorporation       Percent Owned
         ----                               -----------------------------       -------------

Affinity Bank Technology Corporation                 Delaware, USA                    100%

Affinity Clearinghouse Corporation                   Delaware, USA                    100%

Affinity Credit Corporation                          Delaware, USA                    100%

Affinity Processing Corporation                      Delaware, USA                    100%

Affinity Mortgage Technology Corporation             Delaware, USA                    100%

decisioning.com, Inc.                                Delaware, USA                    100%

Multi Financial Services, Inc.                       Delaware, USA                    100%
</TABLE>

                                       47
#### § 28.165 Injury placard.

Each vessel must have posted in a highly visible location accessible to the crew a placard measuring at least 5 inches by 7 inches (127 millimeters by 178 millimeters) which reads:

### Notice

### Report All Injuries

United States law, 46 United States Code 10603, requires each seaman on a fishing vessel, fish processing vessel, or fish tender vessel to notify the master or individual in charge of the vessel or other agent of the employer regarding any illness, disability, or injury suffered by the seaman when in service to the vessel not later than seven days after the date on which the illness, disability, or injury arose.
#### JAMES E. DESMOND ET AL., PROSECUTORS, v. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELIZABETH ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Argued October term, 1928

Decided January 19, 1929.

Before Justices Mintubn, Black and Campbell.

Eor the prosecutors, *James C. Connolly.*

Eor the defendants, *Edward Nugent.*

Pee Cueiam.

A rule to show cause was allowed in this case, why a writ of *certiorari*should not be allowed to review the legality of an ordinance of the city council authorizing the issuance of $50,000 playground bonds of the city of Elizabeth, adopted June 5th, 1928, and all resolutions and proceedings relating thereto; providing for the erection and construction by the city council of the city of a natatorium in the city and to he paid for from the fund created from the sale of said bonds.

Our examination of the testimony sent up with the rule and a reading of the full and satisfactory briefs submitted lead us to the conclusion that the points urged by the prosecutors are not tenable. The rule to show cause should be discharged. The rule is therefore discharged.
§ 327.49 Effect of other payments to claimant. The total amount to which the claimant may be entitled is normally computed as follows: ( a ) The total amount of the loss, damage, or personal injury suffered for which the United States is liable, less any payment the claimant has received from the following sources: ( 1 ) The military member or civilian employee who caused the incident;
( 2 ) The military member's or civilian employee's insurer; and
( 3 ) Any joint tort-feasor or insurer.
( b ) No deduction is generally made for any payment the claimant has received by way of voluntary contributions, such as donations of charitable organizations.
§ 196.80-1 Master's responsibility. ( a ) It shall be the responsibility of the master to have prepared, signed, and prominently posted in conspicuous locations, operating procedures, plans, and safety precautions for all operations involving the use of explosives.
( b ) The operating procedures referred to in paragraph (a) of this section shall include and set forth the special duties and stations of appropriate qualified persons for various operations involving the use of explosives. Assignment of such persons shall be commensurate with their experience and training.
( c ) A copy of the operating procedures, plans and safety precautions required by paragraph (a) of this section and all subsequent changes or revisions shall be forwarded to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, issuing the certificate of inspection for review.
Exhibit 32.1







Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Securities and Exchange Commission


450 Fifth Street, N.W


Washington, D.C. 20549





Ladies and Gentlemen:





The certification set forth below is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Raptor Pharmaceutical Corp. (the “Company”) and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) or its staff upon request.





Christopher M. Starr, Ph.D., the Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, and Kim R. Tsuchimoto, the Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, each certify that:







1.
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and






2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Raptor Pharmaceutical Corp.




This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 15th day of July, 2010.








By: /s/ Christopher M. Starr


Christopher M. Starr, Ph.D.


Chief Executive Officer and Director


(Principal Executive Officer)








By:  /s/ Kim R. Tsuchimoto


Kim R. Tsuchimoto


Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer


(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
(ORDER LIST: 555 U.S.)

FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2008 

APPEAL- JURISDICTION NOTED 

08-205 CITIZENS UNITED V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

 In this case probable jurisdiction is noted. 

CERTIORARI GRANTED

08-22 CAPERTON, HUGH M., ET AL. V. A.T. MASSEY COAL CO., ET AL. 

08-67 YEAGER, F. SCOTT V. UNITED STATES 

08-192 ABUELHAWA, SALMAN K. V. UNITED STATES 

 The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. 

08-5274 DEAN, CHRISTOPHER M. V. UNITED STATES 

 The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma

 pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted.
# C_2014253EN.01000401.xml

| 4.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 May 2014 — Armando Álvarez SA v European Commission

(Case C-36/12 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Plastic industrial bags market - Attribution to the parent company of the infringement committed by the subsidiary - Obligation to state reasons))

2014/C 253/05

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Armando Álvarez SA (represented by: M. Troncoso Ferrer, E. Garayar Gutiérrez and C. Ruixo Claramunt, abogados)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Castilla Contreras and F. Castillo de la Torre, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 November 2011 in Case T-78/06 Álvarez v Commission dismissing an application for annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2005) 4634 final of 30 November 2005 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.354 — Industrial bags) concerning a cartel on the market for plastic industrial bags, and, in the alternative, for a reduction of the fine imposed on Armando Álvarez

Álvarez

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Armando Álvarez SA to pay the costs of this appeal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Armando Álvarez SA to pay the costs of this appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 24.3.2012.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NetSolve, Incorporated (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth C. Kieley, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Kenneth C. KieleyName:

Kenneth C. KieleyTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




August 12, 2003



|* |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supreme Court of the United States

Office of the Clerk

Washington, DC 20543-0001

January 12, 2015

Clerk

United States Court of Appeals for the District of 

Columbia Circuit

333 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20001

Re: Stop This Insanity, Inc. Employee Leadership Fund, et al.

v. Federal Election Commission

No. 14-391

(Your No. 13-5008)

Dear Clerk:

The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case:

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Sincerely,

Scott S. Harris, Clerk

Scott S. Harris

Clerk of the Court

(202) 479-3011

USCA Case #13-5008 Document #1531537 Filed: 01/12/2015 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED  IN  THE  ACCOMPANYING  REGISTRATION
STATEMENT  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          10,894
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,647
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (252)
<INVENTORY>                                        419
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,134
<PP&E>                                             889
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (132)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,697
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,491
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,981
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,697
<SALES>                                          6,266
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,266
<CGS>                                            2,026
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (519)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,696)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,696)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,696)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.66)
        


</TABLE>
Logged onto EDMS as public logon:: preferences Find Documents

Document Search Public Records Req
Help About EDMS FAQ Troubleshooting Guides & Manuals Contact Us What's New? D ocument Search EDMS documents are not viewable in the latest version of Chrome. Click here for more details.

AI Lookup A I TEMPO Activity Number
Date Between 

### 

- Description 

##   Document ID Media 

## 

 Accident Prevention Air Quality Asbestos Biosolids Ground Wate r Hazardous Waste Inactive & Abandoned Sites Document Type 

## 

 Anal y tical Data Boards and Commissions Compliance Correspondence-Internal Correspondence-Receive d Correspondence-Sent Financial Function 

## 

 Agency Governance Air Emissions Inventory Air Modeling Air Monitoring and Analysis Air Planning Air Stack and Tank Testin g Aquifer Evaluation and Protection Document Subtype 

## 

 ADVF Agreement/Contract Air Annual Application Application-Personal Affidavit Assessment/Investigation

Run Count Reset 

## Page 1 of 1 EDMS @ LOUISIANA DEQ

12/23 / 201 5 http://edms.deq.louisiana .gov/app/doc/querydef.aspx
235_Export

min_date max_date Hourly _Hg_Fluegas_Conc Units AvgOfFluegas_Flowrate_scfh 8/24/2009 8/25/2009 3.034 μg/dscm 9378981.836 8/25/2009 8/28/2009 3.856 μg/dscm 9127291.932 8/28/2009 8/30/2009 4.033 μg/dscm 9006927.43

Page 1235_Export

AvgOfFluegas_Temperature_F AvgOfHeat_Input_MMBtu/hr AvgOfAverage_Load 275.65 530.6818182 53.72727273 273.3356164 490.4520548 49.12191781 274.61 485.225 49.19833333

Page 2235_Export

SumOfOperating_Time Moisture_Fraction 22 0.08 73 0.08 59.83333333 0.08

Page 3
From: Costello Insurance insure@aviationi.com

Subject: U A V Insurance and Edward Roberts

Date: May 27, 2015 at 3:55 PM

T

o: Hunter@iroberts.com

FM: COSTELLO INSURANCE

T O: ED W ARD ROBE R TS

Dear M r

. Roberts,

Thank you for completing a request for U A V/Drone insurance information from our website. I am pleased to

provide the following information for your consideration.

1. The aviation insurance companies I represent are not yet ready/willing to o f fer physical

damage (hull) 

### coverage for U A Vs or Drones. In short, no coverage on the aircraft. Just

liability coverage for the negligent operation of the insured aircraft.

2. Nor are they prepared to o f fer coverage for the camera. Y ou may be able to get this

coverage via a 

### floater policy to your homeowne r ’ s or business insurance.

3. Currentl y

, they are willing to o f fer liability coverage based on acceptable underwriting

information.

4. 

### The aircraft must have a business or commercial use.

The most competitive quotes I’ve been seeing for this use are:

$500,000 combined single limit of bodily injury and property damage for $595 per yea r

.

$1,000,000 combined single limit of bodily injury and property damage for $995 per yea r

.

If the aircraft will be used for Business and/or Aerial Photography for Hire and either of the above indication s

interest you please advise and I’ll approach my insurance company for a solid quote.

Note: There is little point in approaching our insurance carriers for quotes until you are close to needing the

coverage. When ready please return to our website, click on the Drone/U A V site, then click on the survey lin k

in the center of the home page. Please complete the survey as we need to send it to our insurance carrier for

a quote.

Thank you for the opportunity to be of assistance!

Best regards,



# Pat

Pat Costello

480

- 968

- 7746

800

- 528

- 6483

480

- 967

- 3828 Fax

insure @ aviationi.com O f fice Email

ww w .aviationi.com W ebsite
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.01


                        LIST OF REGISTRANT'S SUBSIDIARIES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                          Percentage Owned
Name                                      Jurisdiction of Organization                     by Registrant
----                                      ----------------------------                     -------------
<S>                                       <C>                                             <C>
Prism Data Warehouse Solutions Limited               England                                     100%

Prism Solutions Iberica S.L.                         Spain                                       100

Prism Solutions GmbH                                 Germany                                     100

Prism Solutions SARL                                 France                                      100

Prism Solutions Netherlands BV                       Holland                                     100

Prism Solutions Asia Pacific Pty Ltd.                Australia                                   100

Prism Solutions Asia Pacific Ltd.                    New Zealand                                 100

Prism Solutions Hong Kong Ltd.                       Hong Kong                                   100

Prism Solutions Singapore Ltd.                       Singapore                                   100

Prism Solutions Mexico                               Mexico                                      100

Prism Solutions Canada                               Canada                                      100
</TABLE>
#### § 30.10-5a Cargo area—TB/ALL.

The term *cargo area* means that part of a vessel that includes the cargo tanks and other tanks into which cargo or cargo vapors are intentionally introduced, holds containing these tanks, all intervening space within, between, below, or outboard of these tanks or holds, and the deck area over the length and beam of the vessel above these tanks, holds, or spaces.

[CGD 74-127, 41 FR 3842, Jan. 26, 1976]
<Page>

                                                                     Exhibit 3.3

                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                    OF THE
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                           PINNACLE GLOBAL GROUP, INC.

    Pursuant to Article 4.04 of the Texas Business Corporation Act, the
undersigned corporation (the "Corporation") adopted the following Articles of
Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation:

                                  ARTICLE ONE

    The name of the Corporation is Pinnacle Global Group, Inc.

                                  ARTICLE TWO

    The following amendment to the Articles of Incorporation was adopted by
the shareholders of the Corporation on May 22, 2001:

        ARTICLE ONE of the Corporation's Articles of Incorporation is amended
    to read in its entirety as follows:

                                  ARTICLE ONE

                                     Name
                                     ----

    The name of the Corporation is SANDERS MORRIS HARRIS GROUP INC.


                                 ARTICLE THREE

    The number of shares of the Corporation outstanding at the time of
adoption of the amendment was 15,761,546 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par
value, and the number of shares entitled to vote on the amendment was
15,248,426 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value.

<Page>

                                  ARTICLE FOUR

    14,045,102 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value, were voted for the
amendment and 79,588 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value, were voted
against the amendment.

                                  ARTICLE FIVE

    The amendment does not effect a change in the stated capital of the
Corporation.

    DATED: May 22, 2001

                                       PINNACLE GLOBAL GROUP, INC.


                                       By: /s/ Robert E. Garrison II
                                          --------------------------------------
                                           Robert E. Garrison II,
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer










                                       2