alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dock Operations M-30 West Building Ground FloorW-12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington DC 20590; 3

United 

### States ofAmerica Department ofTransportation Office ofSecretary Washington DC



### RE: DocketDOS-OST-1997-2605 Monday, April 08,2013

.. ,:·

...,..,**~"'-~,)** (:,..,·:::: The Eastern Plains Economic Development Corporation, a five county Economic Development**District~and** Certified Regional Development Corporation located in southeastern Montana would like 

### to express its support for the continuation ofEssential Air Service to the Montana Communities ofMiles City 

### and Lewistown.

The economic well being ofthese communities in a state as vast as Montana with greattravel distances will take a huge hit ifair service is terminated. The increasing population and business environment due to the economic boom from oil activity is prevalent in every community in the EAS service 

### area and 

### creating an increasing need for 

### essential air service 

### from ourregional communities. 

### Ourcommunities need 

### air service 

### as partofour economic lifeline and 

### medical services for our 

### citizens.

We encourage you to continue the EAS allowing our communities time 

### to make a plan of action to increase our passenger hoardings, work with the airlines 

### to bettermarket their services, and to research possible changes to flight times that wouldbetter fit the needs for the business community and meet the needs of making connecting flights 

### in Billings. This will allow both communities and others in ourBAS service area to research how we could structure the timeliness offlights as well as consider a Denver destination for the Southern most communities as part ofthe BAS package. Boardings were well above minimum requirements for those southern communities with Denver service.

Termination ofthe Miles City 

### and Lewistown communities could 

### severely jeopardize the current BAS service 

### to the seven communities in Central and 

### Eastern Montana. It 

### is conceivable we could lose this service for everyone. This network of communities has worked together for manyyears tocreate a successful EAS. Not one ofthe communities 

### in the

### EAS service area wants to see one ofour neighbors lose their service. We know the Joss would significantly affect the c<>mmunity and the group of BAS communities.

Thankyou for considering our request toNOT enforce the Order ofShow Cause atthis time and give the EAS task force time to work on this problem. We believe a solution to this problem can be fowtd for both the northern and southern communities in our EASarea.

# s~~

# ~ruttru Executive Director
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending December 2, 2006

|Filer                                 | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|GULFPORT BANCSHARES OF DELAWARE, INC. | * 3A1         | Gulfport Bancshares of Delaware,Inc., Wilmington, Delaware, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of Gulfport Bancshares, Inc., Clute, Texas, and indirectly acquire Brazos National Bank, Richwood, Texas. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:12/29/2006
|Newspaper:                            | Not available
|Federal Register:                     | 12/29/2006   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 141.200 General provisions. ( a ) Unless otherwise specified, all lifesaving equipment must be approved by the Commandant under the approval series specified in each section. Lifesaving equipment for personal use which is not required by this part need not be approved by the Commandant.
( b ) A listing of approved equipment and materials may be found at *https://cgmix.uscg.mil/equipment*. Each cognizant Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI) may be contacted for information concerning approved equipment and materials.
( c ) Equipment requirements are based on the area in which a towing vessel is operating, not the route for which it is certificated. However, the towing vessel must be equipped per the requirements of its certificated route at the time of certification.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending July 8, 2006

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                      | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|SUN AMERICAN BANK | * Branch       | Sun American Bank, Miami, Florida, to establish a branch located at 221 Miracle Mile, Coral Gables, Florida, to be known as the Miracle Mile Branch. | Newspaper:07/12/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 07/12/2006    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT FENNELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 4 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of July, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### § 188.10-69 Scientific laboratory.

This term means those spaces on board an oceanographic research vessel used primarily for scientific experimentation or research, and are so identified.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case Number: 15-cr-20314 

 v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

 Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris 

SAMUEL LEE CURNEY, 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING 

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA 

AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT 

On July 29, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris conducted a plea 

hearing pursuant to Defendant’s consent. The Magistrate Judge issued her report the next day, 

July 30, 2015, recommending that this Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty. 

Although the Magistrate Judge’s report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may 

object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, 

neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the 

Magistrate Judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and 

recommendation waives any further right to appeal. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation 

(ECF No. 13) is ADOPTED. 

 It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s plea of guilty is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 

Plea Agreement (ECF No. 12) is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT. 

Dated: August 24, 2015 s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

1:15-cr-20314-TLL-PTM Doc # 15 Filed 08/24/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 63
PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on August 24, 2015. 

 s/Karri Sandusky 

 Karri Sandusky, Acting Case Manager 

1:15-cr-20314-TLL-PTM Doc # 15 Filed 08/24/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 64
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             362,685    
<SECURITIES>                                             0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,222,277 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        12,981 
<INVENTORY>                                        530,183 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,535,734 
<PP&E>                                          12,043,300 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,890,414 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,401,431 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,365,116 
<BONDS>                                          9,598,315 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                                 0 
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,268,043 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,401,431 
<SALES>                                         24,725,077 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,725,077 
<CGS>                                           19,597,991 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,413,629 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    12,981 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 627,799 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (177,044)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (152,304)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (24,740)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0 
<CHANGES>                                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                                       (24,740)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0 
                                               


</TABLE>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending November 4, 2006

|Filer             | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                          
|----------------- | ----------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|BEACON BANCORP    | * 3A5* 3A3  | Application by Beacon Bancorp, Taunton, Massachusetts to acquire Randolph Bancorp, Stoughton, Massachusetts and its subsidiary bank, Randolph Savings Bank, Randolph, Massachusetts, pursuant to sections 3(a)(3) and 3(a)(5) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. | Newspaper:11/30/2006Federal Register:12/01/2006
|Newspaper:        | 11/30/2006 
|Federal Register: | 12/01/2006 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Monetary Policy Report to the Congress; logo includes title and image of the U.S. CapitolJuly 20, 2000, ReportSection 1:
Monetary Policy and the Economic Outlook  

Section 2:
Economic and Financial Developments in 2000Full Report:

PDF (265 KB) | ASCII (96 KB)Home |
News and events |
Monetary policy
Accessibility | Contact UsLast update: July 20, 2000, 10:00 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRAACTED FROM
PCD INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR PERIOD ENDED MARCH 29, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                          20,747
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,345
<ALLOWANCES>                                       236
<INVENTORY>                                      2,862
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,810
<PP&E>                                          10,108
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,756
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,365
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            59
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,062
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,486
<SALES>                                          6,217
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,217
<CGS>                                            3,264
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,264
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,356
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,858
<INCOME-TAX>                                       683
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,175
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,175
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18


</TABLE>
# C_2013344EN.01002902.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/29

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 September 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de commerce, Brussels — Belgium) — Christian Van Buggenhout and Ilse Van de Mierop, acting as liquidators in the insolvency of Grontimmo SA v Banque Internationale à Luxembourg SA

(Case C-251/12) (1)

1

(Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 - Insolvency proceedings - Article 24(1) - Honouring an obligation ‘for the benefit of a debtor that is subject to insolvency proceedings’ - Payment made to a creditor of that debtor)

2013/C 344/50

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal de commerce, Brussels

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Christian Van Buggenhout and Ilse Van de Mierop, acting as liquidators in the insolvency of Grontimmo SA

Applicant:

Defendant: Banque Internationale à Luxembourg SA

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal de commerce de Bruxelles — Interpretation of Article 24 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings (OJ 2000 L 160, p. 1) — Payment made to a creditor of the insolvent debtor, at the request of the latter, in the absence of publication of the decision opening insolvency proceedings in another Member State — Discharge of agent acting in good faith — The scope rationae personae — Definition of ‘for the benefit of the debtor’ including solely payments made to the insolvent debtor or also payments made to its creditors

rationae personae

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 24(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings must be interpreted as meaning that a payment made at the behest of a debtor subject to insolvency proceedings to one of the latter’s creditors does not fall within the scope of that provision.

---

(1)  OJ C 200, 7.7.2012.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6418

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

DAVID CARROLL, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., 

Senior District Judge. (1:94-cr-00519-1) 

Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: July 1, 2009 

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

David Carroll, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 David Carroll appeals the district court’s orders 

denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed 

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and his motion to 

convene a three-judge district court. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny 

Carroll's motion to remand and affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. United States v. Carroll, No. 1:94-cr00519-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 7, 2009). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
#### § 201.140 Records in other proceedings.

When any portion of the record before the Administration in any proceeding other than the one being heard is offered in evidence, a true copy of such portion shall be presented for the record in the form of an exhibit unless the parties represented at the hearing stipulate upon the record that such portion may be incorporated by reference.
# C_2013344EN.01005502.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/55

---

Order of the General Court of 1 October 2013 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission

(Case T-554/11) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Financing by the European Union of certain projects in Tunisia, in the framework of the EuropeAid programme - Development of an integrated IT system for the Tunisian judiciary - Recovery by the Commission of debts payable to Tunisia by a third party - Debit note - Acts inseparable from the contract - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissible)

2013/C 344/98

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, M. Dermitzakis, and N. Theologou, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bordes and S. Bartelt, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision refusing to settle sums allegedly payable and requiring repayment of the sum of EUR 281 270,00 paid in the framework of the implementation of the contract EuropeAid/124378/D/SER/TN (No 2007/145-464), communicated to the applicant by letter dated 8 August 2011 (C&F/2011/D/001101), and also of debit note 3241108036, received by the applicant on 17 August 2011, and of all the Commission’s related decisions

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE, in addition to bearing its own costs, shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE, in addition to bearing its own costs, shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 370, 17.12.2011.

1

---
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*Ross E. *Terry, v.*William S. Mould and others.

Conviction of relator by board of excise affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Gilbert, J.