alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2174 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2174

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 18 Main Street in Howland, Maine, as the ``Clyde Hichborn Post 
                               Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2009

   Mr. Michaud (for himself and Ms. Pingree of Maine) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 18 Main Street in Howland, Maine, as the ``Clyde Hichborn Post 
                               Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLYDE HICHBORN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 18 Main Street in Howland, Maine, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Clyde Hichborn Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Clyde 
Hichborn Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 385.62 Grant and cooperative agreements: Standard general provisions. ( a ) MarAd has adopted two standard general provisions which apply to grant and cooperative agreements, respectively, and said provisions are hereby incorporated by reference into these regulations.[2]
( b ) MarAd reserves the right to amend or to render inapplicable any portion of the particular standard general provisions required for any particular grant or cooperative agreement: *Provided,* That such modification shall be accomplished only by means of an explicit statement in the special provisions executed by MarAd and a particular recipient.
Footnotes -
385.62
[2] A copy of both such incorporated provisions accompany this regulation and are on file in the Office of the Federal Register.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          38,660
<SECURITIES>                                    27,291
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,194
<ALLOWANCES>                                       200
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,388
<PP&E>                                           2,792
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,335
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  99,864
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,840
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           180
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,092
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    99,864
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,951
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,303
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   137
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,762
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,905
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,857
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,857
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
        

</TABLE>
# C_2014078EN.01001101.xml

| 15.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/11

---

Order of the General Court of 21 January 2014 — Bricmate v Council

(Case T-596/11) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Dumping - Imports of ceramic tiles originating in China - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Absence of individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility)

2014/C 78/21

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bricmate AB (Stockholm, Sweden) (represented by: C. Dackö, A. Willems and S. De Knop, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix and B. Driessen, acting as Agents, assisted initially by G. Berrisch and A. Polcyn, and subsequently by A. Polcyn, lawyers)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. França and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents); Cerame-Unie AISBL (Brussels, Belgium); Asociación Española de Fabricantes de Azulejos y Pavimentos Cerámicos (ASCER) (Castellón de la Plana, Spain); Confindustria Ceramica (Sassuolo, Italy); Casalgrande Padana SpA (Casalgrande, Italy); Etruria Design Srl (Modena, Italy) (represented by: V. Akritidis and Y. Melin, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 917/2011 of 12 September 2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of ceramic tiles originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2011 L 238, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as being inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

| 2. | Bricmate AB shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Bricmate AB shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

| 3. | The European Commission shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The European Commission shall bear its own costs.

| 4. | Cerame-Unie AISBL, Asociación Española de Fabricantes de Azulejos y Pavimentos Cerámicos (ASCER), Confindustria Ceramica, Casalgrande Padana SpA and Etruria Design Srl shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Cerame-Unie AISBL, Asociación Española de Fabricantes de Azulejos y Pavimentos Cerámicos (ASCER), Confindustria Ceramica, Casalgrande Padana SpA and Etruria Design Srl shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.

1

---
#### § 167.01-20 OMB control numbers assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

(a) *Purpose.* This section collects and displays the control numbers assigned to information collection and recordkeeping requirements in this subchapter by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). The Coast Guard intends that this section comply with the requirements of 44 U.S.C. 3507(f), which requires that agencies display a current control number assigned by the Director of the OMB for each approved agency information collection requirement.

(b) *Display.*

| 46 CFR part or section where identified or described | Current OMB control No |
| --- | --- |
| § 167.15-35 | 1625-0032 |
| § 167.65-38 | 1625-0064 |
| § 167.65-42 | 1625-0064 |

[CGD 88-072, 53 FR 34298, Sept. 6, 1988, as amended by CGD 89-037, 57 FR 41824, Sept. 11, 1992; USCG-2004-18884, 69 FR 58350, Sept. 30, 2004]
#### James M. Randall, *Appellant, v.*Aaron W. Dunbar and others, *Respondents*.

Order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
Exhibit 31.2
I, Dallas G. Smiley, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Citizens FirstFinancial Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrantand have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 29, 2004           /s/ Dallas G. Smiley      Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     UNAUDITED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE PERIOD  ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 THAT
     WERE WERE FILED WITH THE  COMPANY'S  REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED
     IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>         0001071355
<NAME>        Premier Brands, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1
<CURRENCY>                                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         72,591
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               72,591
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 72,591
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          85,782
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        4,208
<OTHER-SE>                                    (17,399)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   72,591
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                6,409
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,409)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,409)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,409)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.002)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.002)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>








                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lakes Entertainment, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lyle
Berman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




                                                     /s/Lyle Berman
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Lyle Berman
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     November 12, 2003
#### § 30.10-5b Cargo control station—TB/ALL.

The term *cargo control station* means a location that is manned during cargo transfer operations for the purpose of directing or controlling the loading or unloading of cargo.

[CGD 74-127, 41 FR 3842, Jan. 26, 1976]
#### § 382.1 Scope.

The regulations in this part prescribe the type of information that shall be submitted to the Maritime Administration (MARAD) by operators interested in carrying bulk and packaged preference cargoes, and the method for calculating fair and reasonable rates for the carriage of dry (including packaged) and liquid bulk preference cargoes on U.S.-flag commercial vessels, except vessels engaged in liner trades, which is defined as service provided on an advertised schedule, giving relatively frequent sailings between specific U.S. ports or ranges and designated foreign ports or ranges.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of TorreyPines Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Craig Johnson, Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Craig JohnsonCraig JohnsonVice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


November 12, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 4263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01413]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[Certification Notice--231;]

Notice of Filing of Self-Certification of Coal Capability Under 
the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act

AGENCY: Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of filing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  On December 18, 2014, Calpine Mid Merit II, LLC, York Energy 
Center--Block 2, as owner and operator of an additional new base load 
electric powerplant, submitted a coal capability self-certification to 
the Department of Energy (DOE) pursuant to Sec.  201(d) of the 
Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978 (FUA), as amended, and 
DOE regulations in 10 CFR 501.60, 61. FUA and regulations thereunder 
require DOE to publish a notice of filing of self-certification in the 
Federal Register. 42 U.S.C. 8311(d) and 10 CFR 501.61(c).

ADDRESSES:  Copies of coal capability self-certification filings are 
available for public inspection, upon request, in the Office of 
Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, Mail Code OE-20, Room 8G-
024, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 
20585.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Christopher Lawrence at (202) 586-
5260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Title II of FUA, as amended (42 U.S.C. 8301 
et seq.), provides that no new base load electric powerplant may be 
constructed or operated without the capability to use coal or another 
alternate fuel as a primary energy source. Pursuant to FUA in order to 
meet the requirement of coal capability, the owner or operator of such 
a facility proposing to use natural gas or petroleum as its primary 
energy source shall certify to the Secretary of Energy (Secretary) 
prior to construction, or prior to operation as a base load electric 
powerplant, that such powerplant has the capability to use coal or 
another alternate fuel. Such certification establishes compliance with 
FUA section 201(a) as of the date it is filed with the Secretary. 42 
U.S.C. 8311.
    The following owner of a proposed additional new base load electric 
powerplant has filed a self-certification of coal-capability with DOE 
pursuant to FUA section 201(d) and in accordance with DOE regulations 
in 10 CFR 501.60, 61:

Owner: Calpine Mid Merit II, LLC, York Energy Center--Block 2
Capacity: 760 megawatts (MW)
Plant Location: York County, Peach Bottom Township, Pennsylvania
In-Service Date: On or before June 1, 2017

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 22, 2015.
Brian Mills,
Director, Permitting and Siting, Office of Electricity Delivery and 
Energy Reliability.
[FR Doc. 2015-01413 Filed 1-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
#### § 189.25-15 Lifesaving equipment.

For inspection procedures of lifesaving appliances and arrangements, see subchapter W (Lifesaving Appliances and Arrangements) of this chapter.

[CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25312, May 20, 1996]
# C_2011152EN.01002701.xml

| 21.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/27

---

Action brought on 18 March 2011 — Sport Eybl & Sports Experts v OHIM — Seven (SEVEN SUMMITS)

(Case T-179/11)

2011/C 152/48

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sport Eybl & Sports Experts GmbH (Wels, Austria) (represented by: S. Fürst, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Seven SpA (Leinì, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Overrule the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 January 2011 in case R 364/2010-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Overrule the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 January 2011 in case R 364/2010-4;

| — | Fix the total amount of costs to be paid by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

—

Fix the total amount of costs to be paid by the defendant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘SEVEN SUMMITS’, in colours blue and red, for amongst others goods in class 18 — Community trade mark application No 6307243

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 3489234 of the figurative mark ‘Seven’, for goods in classes 16 and 18; Community trade mark registration No 4783866 of the figurative mark ‘7Seven’, for goods in classes 16 and 18

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal wrongly determined the existence of likelihood of confusion.

Pleas in law:

---