alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment No. 2 to AHCA Contract


 Exhibit 10.1 
  

			
	WELL CARE HMO, INC.	 	Medicaid HMO Contract
	d/b/a STAYWELL HEALTH PLAN OF FLORIDA	 	 

  
  
 AHCA CONTRACT NO. FA522 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2

  
 THIS CONTRACT, entered into between STATE OF FLORIDA, AGENCY
FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, hereinafter referred to as the “Agency” and WELL CARE HMO, INC., d/b/a STAYWELL HEALTH PLAN OF FLORIDA, hereinafter referred to as the “Vendor”, is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	1.	Standard Contract, the first paragraph is hereby amended to change the Vendor’s address to the following: 

  
 8735 Henderson Road, Ren 2 
 Tampa, FL 33634 
  

	2.	Standard Contract, Section III.C.2 is hereby amended to change the contract manager’s name, address and telephone number to the following: 

  
 Pearl Blackburn 
 Well Care HMO, Inc., d/b/a Staywell Health Plan of Florida 
 8735 Henderson Road, Ren 2 
 Tampa, FL 33634 
 (813) 243-2970 
  

	3.	Standard Contract, Section III.E.1 is hereby amended to change the mailing address to the following: 

  
 Well Care HMO, Inc., d/b/a Staywell Health Plan of Florida 
 Attn: Regulatory Affairs 
 P.O. Box 25735

 Tampa, FL 33622-5736 
  

	4.	Standard Contract, Section III.E.2 is hereby amended to change the contact person and street address to the following: 

  
 Pearl Blackburn 
 8735 Henderson Road, Ren 2 
 Tampa, FL 33634

  

	5.	This amendment shall begin on December 3, 2004, or the date on which the amendment has been signed by both parties, whichever is later. 

  
 All provisions in the Contract and any attachments thereto in conflict with
this amendment shall be and are hereby changed to confirm with this amendment. 
  
 All provisions not in conflict with this amendment are still in effect and are to be performed at the level specified in the Contract. 
  
 AHCA Contract No. FA522, Amendment No. 2, Page 1 of 3 







			
	WELL CARE HMO, INC.	 	Medicaid HMO Contract
	d/b/a STAYWELL HEALTH PLAN OF FLORIDA	 	 

  
 This amendment and all
its attachments are hereby made a part of the Contract. 
  
 This
amendment cannot be executed unless all previous amendments to this Contract have been fully executed. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this 2 page amendment (including all attachments) to be executed by their officials thereunto duly authorized. 
  

							
	 WELL CARE HMO, INC.,
 d/b/a
STAYWELL HEALTH
 PLAN OF FLORIDA
	 	 STATE OF FLORIDA, AGENCY FOR
 HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION

		
	SIGNED	 	SIGNED
	BY:	 	 /s/ TODD S. FARHA

	 	BY:	 	 /s/ ALAN LEVINE


	NAME:	 	Todd S. Farha	 	NAME:	 	Alan Levine
				
	TITLE:	 	Chief Executive Officer	 	TITLE:	 	Secretary
		
	DATE:12/27/04	 	DATE:1/14/05

  
 THE REMAINDER OF
THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY 
  
 AHCA Contract No.
FA522, Amendment No. 2, Page 2 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at December 31, 1999 and the Statement of Operations for the
Year Ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          65,039
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  119,012
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               184,051
<PP&E>                                       4,133,496
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,641,058
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 676,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              523
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     675,966
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   676,489
<SALES>                                        384,352
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               386,378
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               110,506
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                275,872
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            275,872
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   275,872
<EPS-BASIC>                                      24.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    24.14


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.409 High level alarms. When Table 1 refers to this section or requires a cargo to have a closed gauging system, the cargo's containment system must have a high level alarm: ( a ) That gives an audible and visual alarm before the tank fills to 97 percent of its capacity;
( b ) That can be seen and heard where cargo transfer is controlled and on the open deck;
( c ) Whose operation can be checked prior to each loading; and
( d ) That must be marked as described in § 153.408(c)(6) with the legend “HIGH LEVEL ALARM.”
[CGD 78-128, 47 FR 21209, May 17, 1982; 47 FR 27293, June 24, 1982]
§ 136.115 Equivalents. ( a ) The Coast Guard may approve any arrangement, fitting, appliance, apparatus, equipment, calculation, information, or test that provides a level of safety equivalent to that established by any specific provision of this subchapter. Submit requests for approval to the Coast Guard via the cognizant OCMI. The Marine Safety Center may require engineering evaluations and tests to verify the equivalence.
( b ) The Coast Guard may accept compliance with the provisions of SOLAS applicable to the vessel's size and route (incorporated by reference, see § 136.112), as an equivalent to specific requirements of this subchapter. Submit requests for a determination of equivalency for a particular vessel to the Coast Guard via the cognizant OCMI.
( c ) Alternative compliance arrangement provisions related to SMSs are contained in § 138.225 of this subchapter.
( d ) Alternate compliance arrangements must be documented within the TSMS applicable to the vessel.
§ 310.5 Personnel. ( a ) *Selection and appointment of Superintendent and faculty by State authorities.* ( 1 ) The State shall select and appoint the Superintendent of a School in accordance with qualifications established by appropriate State authorities. The State shall notify the Maritime Administrator whenever a new Superintendent is appointed and furnished with appropriate background information on the appointee for informational purposes.
( 2 ) The State shall appoint faculty members in disciplines other than engineering and navigation on the basis of the same criteria used in the employment of such personnel in State-supported colleges and universities throughout the State. Faculty members in navigation and engineering courses, including steam and diesel, shall meet appropriate academic and practical experience standards adopted by the school and approved by the Administration.
( b ) *Personnel for Training Ships* — ( 1 ) *Commanding Officer.* The Commanding Officer shall hold a valid Master's Ocean, Unlimited Tonnage license including Radar Observer endorsement issued by the United States Coast Guard and shall have served at least two (2) years as Master, Chief Officer, Commanding Officer, or Executive Officer either (i) on oceangoing vessels under the authority of said Master's Ocean, Unlimited Tonnage license, or (ii) in the case of sea service as a member of the Uniformed Services of the United States, on ships accepted by the United States Coast Guard as equivalent for qualifying service for issue of a Master's Ocean, Unlimited Tonnage license.
( 2 ) *Chief Engineer.* The Chief Engineer must hold a valid Chief Engineer's (Steam) Ocean, Unlimited Horsepower license, issued by the United States Coast Guard and have served as Chief Engineer of an oceangoing steamship of comparable horsepower to that of the particular Training Ship.
( 3 ) *Watch Officers.* Both Deck and Engineer Watch Officers in charge of a watch, underway, shall hold valid Ocean, Unlimited Tonnage licenses, issued by the United States Coast Guard, in their particular field.
( 4 ) *Radio Officers.* During each training cruise the Training Ship shall have assigned one or more radio officers holding a valid license issued by the United States Coast Guard, in accordance with its regulations.
( 5 ) *Licensed Engineer.* When a Training Ship boiler is in operation, there shall be a Licensed Engineer qualified to stand the watch aboard at all times.
( c ) *Insignia for officers and other School personnel.* The State may furnish insignia for officers and other school personnel, other than officers of the United States Navy, United States Naval Reserve, United States Maritime Service and United States Coast Guard.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 2133-0010) (Sec. 204(b), Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended (46 U.S.C. 1114(b)); Pub. L. 97-31 (August 6, 1981); 49 CFR 1.66 (46 FR 47458, Sept. 28, 1981))
[46 FR 37694, July 22, 1981, as amended at 47 FR 25530, June 14, 1982; 49 FR 13365, Apr. 4, 1984]
#### Henry R. Wilkinson, *Plaintiff, v.*James Gill, *Defendant*.

Order affirmed, without costs, and without prejudice to a further application, as suggested in the opinion. Opinion by

Brady, J.
**EXHIBIT 99.18****CONSENT OF EXPERT**Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Cameco Corporation (the“Company”) to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.I hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name under the heading “The NuclearBusiness — Reserves and Resources” in the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year endedDecember 31, 2006, dated March 30, 2007 (the “AIF”), under the heading “Qualified Persons” inManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation for the yearended December 31, 2006 (the “MD&A”) and in the 40-F, and to disclosure of a scientific andtechnical nature pursuant to which I have acted in a supervisory capacity under the heading “TheNuclear Business — Reserves and Resources” of the AIF and under the heading “Qualified Persons” inthe MD&A.Sincerely,*/s/ Dave Crawford*
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

###### Editorial Note on Subpart 151.50 of Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart 151.50 of part 151 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, and CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996.

#### § 151.50-1 General.

Special requirements found in this subpart pertain to specific cargoes and to similar groups of cargoes. These requirements are in addition to and take precedence over any other requirements found in these regulations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    49373
<ALLOWANCES>                                       455
<INVENTORY>                                      50414
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                100942
<PP&E>                                          247913
<DEPRECIATION>                                   22225
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  376795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            60414
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        9253
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    376795
<SALES>                                         388990
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                388990
<CGS>                                           357914
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   357914
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               24356
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9965)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (9965)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9965)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 45.181 Load line exemption requirements for the Burns Harbor and Milwaukee routes. Barges operating on the Burns Harbor and Milwaukee routes may be conditionally exempted from load line assignment provided that the following requirements are met: ( a ) *Registration.* Before the barge's first voyage onto Lake Michigan, the owner or operator must register the barge in writing with the Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Unit Chicago, 555A Plainfield Road, Willowbrook, IL, 60527. The registration may be faxed to MSU Chicago in advance at (630) 986-2120, with the original following by mail. The registration may be in any form, but must be signed by the owner or operator. No load line exemption certificate will be returned. However, the registration will be kept on file.
( b ) The registration must include the following information: ( 1 ) Barge name and official documentation number;
( 2 ) Owner and operator (points-of-contact, company addresses and telephone numbers);
( 3 ) Service route (Milwaukee and/or Burns Harbor);
( 4 ) Design type (covered/uncovered hopper, deck, etc.);
( 5 ) External dimensions;
( 6 ) Types of cargo; and
( 7 ) Place built and original delivery date.
( c ) The registration must include a statement certifying that: ( 1 ) The barge has been designed and built to at least the minimum scantlings of the ABS River Rules which were in effect at the time of construction; and
( 2 ) The owner or operator agrees to maintain the barge in serviceable condition and comply with the applicable provisions of 46 CFR part 45, subpart E.
( d ) *Expiration.* Registration is valid only until the earliest of the following events: ( 1 ) The tenth anniversary of the delivery date (for barges on the Milwaukee route),
( 2 ) The barge no longer is fit for this service (due to damage), or
( 3 ) The barge changes ownership or operators (registration is not transferable to new owners or operators; the barge must be re-registered if it is to continue in Lake Michigan service).
( e ) *Notification.* The owner or operator of an exempted barge must notify the OCMI of the transfer of ownership or change of operator, withdrawal from Lake Michigan service (due to damage, age, or other circumstances), or other disposition of the barge.
[USCG-1998-4623, 67 FR 19690, Apr. 23, 2002, as amended by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36330, July 2, 2007; 75 FR 70604, Nov. 18, 2010]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM COMPUMED,
INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          24,000
<SECURITIES>                                 5,017,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  626,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   211,000
<INVENTORY>                                    112,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,709,000
<PP&E>                                       7,675,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,601,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,159,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,160,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        83,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,159,000
<SALES>                                        578,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               652,000
<CGS>                                          324,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  397,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               904,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              85,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   649,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Lothrop *& a. v.*Locke.

' A declaration in replevin alleging an unlawful caption of a chattel is not • supported by proof of an unlawful detention.

Replevin, for a piano. The declaration alleged that the defendant unlawfully took the piano. Plea, *non*cepit, with a brief statement that the piano was the property of one M. The evidence tended to show that M., who was the defendant’s daughter, hired the piano of the plaintiffs, and had possession of it during several years. She paid $50 as rent, and for the same purpose gave the plaintiffs a note which her father had given her, upon which the plaintiffs have received $35. Before the commencement of this action the plaintiffs demanded the piano. The defendant moved for a nonsuit, which the court refused; and the defendant excepted. The cause was taken from the jury, and the questions raised by the exception were reserved.

*Copeland*JEdgerly, for the defendant.

Wheeler, for the plaintiffs.

Smith, J.

The plea of *non cepit*put in issue the unlawful taking only. *Carter*v. Piper, 57 N. H. 217. The piano came rightfully into the possession of the defendant’s daughter by a lease from the plaintiffs. It does not appear what the terms of the lease were, nór whether it had expired, nor whether she had forfeited her right to the possession of the piano by failure to comply with its terms. The general property in the piano remained in the plaintiffs, and as between them and the defendant he had no right to the possession. It does not appear that he ever had the possession of the instrument, or had it in his power to deliver it to the plaintiffs when demanded. 2 Gr. Ev., s. 644. There was no evidence of an unlawful taking, as alleged. The demand and refusal, at the most, were only evidence of a prior conversion. The motion for a nonsuit should have been granted. *Carter*v. Piper, 57 N. H. 217. The plaintiffs now ask to amend by alleging an unlawful detention. This motion will be heard at the trial term, and, if granted, the defendant will of course be entitled to change ■his plea to meet the amendment, and the cause will stand for trial.

*Case discharged.*

Eoster, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
#### Taylor v. Wilson.

(Decided March 25, 1919.)

Appeal from Carlisle Circuit Court.

1. Quieting Title — Actual Possession. — An action to quiet title does not lie against a defendant who is in the actual possession of the land.

2. Judgment-Actions at Daw — Suits in Equity. — “A judgment given against a plaintiff on the single ground that he has mistaken his remedy or form of action is no har to his subsequent action brought in proper form.” ’

JOHN K. HENDRICK and SHELBOURNE *&*SHELBOURNE for appellant.

JOHN E. KANE for appellee.

Response to Petition por Rehearing

by Judge Sampson.

(For original opinion see 182 Ky. 592.)

The. judgment of the circuit court dismissed the petition of the plaintiff Taylor, appellant here, for the reason that she was not in the actual possession of the land at the time of the commencement of the action, following the .rule of this court, often announced, that an 'action io quiet title does not lie against a defendant who is in the actual possession of land, claiming it as his own. As the evidence conclusively proved that appellee Wilson was in the actual possession of the land in controversy at the time the suit was instituted, and the appellant virtually admitted that she was not in the actual posses*696sion, the judgment was affirmed by this court. The proper .remedy in such cases is by ejectment.

While Mrs. Taylor was not entitled to maintain an action to quiet title, she could have maintained an action in ejectment. The judgment below did not go to the merits, but only dismissed plaintiff’s petition. Such a judgment, though affirmed by this court, does not prejudice the right of Mrs. Taylor to institute and maintain the proper kind of action. “A judgment given against a plaintiff on the single ground that he has mistaken his remedy or form of action, is no bar to his subsequent action brought in the proper form. ” 2nd Black on Judgments, 715; 1st Freeman on Judgments, secs. 260, 265; City of Covington v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., 112 S. W. 862; Rice v. West, 42 S. W. 116, 19 Ky. L. R. 832.

If appellant, Mrs. Taylor, would otherwise have a right of action in ejectment to recover the land in controversy that cause is not prejudicially affected by the judgment in the preceding case to quiet title for the reasons above stated, and that judgment can not be pleaded as *res judicata.*