alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Douglas T. Watson, certify that: 

1.   I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A ofDigital Video Systems, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant'sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant'smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 29, 2004 

/s/ Douglas T. Watson
#### § 381.5 Fix American-flag tonnage first.

Each department or agency having responsibility under the Cargo Preference Act of 1954 shall cause each full shipload of cargo subject to said act to be fixed on U.S.-flag vessels prior to any fixture on foreign-flag vessels for at least that portion of all preference cargoes required by that Act and the Food Security Act of 1985 to be shipped on U.S.-flag vessels, computed by purchase authorization or other quantitative unit satisfactory to the agency involved and the Maritime Administration, except where such department or agency determines, with the concurrence of the Maritime Administration, that (a) U.S.-flag vessels are not available at fair and reasonable rates for U.S.-flag commercial vessels, or (b) that there is a substantially valid reason for fixing foreign-flag vessels first.

[G.O. 103, Amdt. 2, 36 FR 19254, Oct. 1, 1971, as amended at 57 FR 13047, Apr. 15, 1992]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 95 (Thursday, May 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 27823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2430]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Integrated Preclinical/Clinical 
Program for HIV Topical Microbicides.
    Date: June 7-8, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton/Washington, DC/Rockville, Executive Meeting 
Center, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Clayton C. Huntley, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID/DHHS, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-2570, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#791a110c170d151c0039171018101d57171011571e160f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="beddd6cbd0cad2dbc7fed0d7dfd7da90d0d7d690d9d1c8">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 8, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2430 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 32.60-25 Living quarters—TB/ALL.

For living quarters the partitions and sheathing shall be of an approved fire resistive construction. The specification for incombustible materials is in subchapter Q (Specifications) of this chapter.

[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16671, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51198, Sept. 30, 1997]
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                  MORRISON FRESH COOKING, INC.
                   DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

      THIS  FIRST AMENDMENT is made on this 31st day of December,
1996, by MORRISON FRESH COOKING, INC. (the "Primary Sponsor"),  a
corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
Georgia.

                      W I T N E S S E T H:

      WHEREAS,  the Primary Sponsor maintains the Morrison  Fresh
Cooking, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan"), which  was
established by indenture dated March 7, 1996;

      WHEREAS,  Ruby Tuesday, Inc. is the successor  to  Morrison
Restaurants Inc. which effected that certain plan of distribution
involving  the  distribution to its stockholders of  all  of  the
outstanding  shares  of common stock, respectively,  of  Morrison
Fresh   Cooking,  Inc.  and  Morrison  Health  Care,  Inc.   (the
"Distributions"); and

      WHEREAS,  the  Primary Sponsor desires to  amend  the  Plan
primarily  to  clarify  how the Distributions  will  affect  Plan
participation by certain former employees of Morrison Restaurants
Inc.  who  did  not continue in the employment of Morrison  Fresh
Cooking, Inc. immediately following the Distributions;

      NOW,  THEREFORE,  the  Plan  is hereby  amended,  effective
immediately, as follows:

1.   By adding a new Section 1.11A, as follows:

           "1.11A  `Distributions' means the distributions by MRI
     to  its  stockholders  of all of the outstanding  shares  of
     common stock, respectively, of Morrison Fresh Cooking,  Inc.
     and Morrison Health Care, Inc."

2.   By adding a new Section 1.15A, as follows:

          "1.15A  `Former Morrison Employee' means an employee of
     MRI  at  any  time  prior  to  the  effective  date  of  the
     Distributions who did not continue in the employ of Morrison
     Fresh Cooking, Inc. immediately after the Distributions, but
     who  subsequently has been hired by Morrison Fresh  Cooking,
     Inc."

3.   By  adding  a  new  final clause to the  final  sentence  of
     Section 3.3(c), as follows:

     ";  provided,  however, with respect to any Former  Morrison
     Employee,  periods  of employment with MRI  or  any  of  its
     affiliates  completed on or prior to the effective  date  of
     the Distributions shall be disregarded."

     Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain
in full force and effect as prior to this First Amendment.

      IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF, the Primary Sponsor has  caused  this
First Amendment to be executed as of the day and year first above
written.


                              MORRISON FRESH COOKING, INC.



                              By:  /s/ Ronnie L. Tatum
                                    Ronnie L. Tatum
                              Title:  Chief Executive Officer


ATTEST:



/s/ Mitchell S. Block
 Mitchell S. Block
Title:  Secretary

     [CORPORATE SEAL]
§ 31.10-17 Annual and periodic inspections—TB/ALL. ( a ) *Annual inspection.* Your vessel must undergo an annual inspection within 3 months before or after each anniversary date, except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section. ( 1 ) You must contact the cognizant OCMI to schedule an inspection at a time and place which he or she approves. No written application is required.
( 2 ) The scope of the annual inspection is the same as the inspection for certification but in less detail unless the cognizant marine inspector finds deficiencies or determines that a major change has occurred since the last inspection. If deficiencies are found or a major change to the vessel has occurred, the marine inspector will conduct an inspection more detailed in scope to ensure that the vessel is in satisfactory condition and fit for the service for which it is intended. If your vessel passes the annual inspection, the marine inspector will endorse your vessel's current Certificate of Inspection.
( 3 ) If the annual inspection reveals deficiencies in your vessel's maintenance, you must make any or all repairs or improvements within the time period specified by the OCMI.
( 4 ) Nothing in this subpart limits the marine inspector from conducting such tests or inspections he or she deems necessary to be assured of the vessel's seaworthiness.
( b ) *Periodic inspection.* Your vessel must undergo a periodic inspection within 3 months before or after the second or third anniversary of the date of your vessel's Certificate of Inspection. This periodic inspection will take the place of an annual inspection. ( 1 ) You must contact the cognizant OCMI to schedule an inspection at a time and place which he or she approves. No written application is required.
( 2 ) The scope of the periodic inspection is the same as that for the inspection for certification, as specified in § 31.10-15(b). The OCMI will ensure that the vessel is in satisfactory condition and fit for the service for which it is intended. If your vessel passes the periodic inspection, the marine inspector will endorse your vessel's current Certificate of Inspection.
( 3 ) If the periodic inspection reveals deficiencies in your vessel's maintenance, you must make any or all repairs or improvements within the time period specified by the OCMI.
( 4 ) Nothing in this subpart limits the marine inspector from conducting such tests or inspections he or she deems necessary to be assured of the vessel's seaworthiness.
[USCG-1999-4976, 65 FR 6499, Feb. 9, 2000]
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 89 (Monday, May 9, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 26583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2011-9613]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

15 CFR Part 774

[Docket No. 110106012-1013-01]
RIN 0694-AF04

Implementation of the Understandings Reached at the 2010 
Australia Group (AG) Plenary Meeting and Other AG-Related 
Clarifications and Corrections to the EAR

Correction

    In rule document 2011-9613 appearing on pages 22017-22019 in the 
issue of April 20, 2011, make the following correction:

PART 774--[CORRECTED]

Supplement No. 1 to Part 774--[Corrected]

    On page 22019, in the first column, instruction 4.c. is corrected 
to read as follows:
    c. By removing the phrase ``Glass or glasslined (including 
vitrified or enameled coatings),'' where it appears in paragraph g.4, 
and adding in its place the phrase ``Glass (including vitrified or 
enameled coating or glass lining);'' and

[FR Doc. C1-2011-9613 Filed 5-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9613-P
```
§ 197.450 Breathing gas tests. The diving supervisor shall insure that— ( a ) The output of each air compressor is tested and meets the requirements of § 197.340 for quality and quantity by means of samples taken at the connection point to the distribution system— ( 1 ) Every 6 months; and
( 2 ) After every repair or modification.
( b ) Purchased supplies of breathing mixtures supplied to a diver are checked before being placed on line for— ( 1 ) Certification that the supply meets the requirements of § 197.340; and
( 2 ) Noxious or offensive odor and oxygen percentage;
( c ) Each breathing supply system is checked, prior to commencement of diving operations, at the umbilical or underwater breathing apparatus connection point for the diver, for noxious or offensive odor and presence of oil mist; and
( d ) Each breathing supply system, supplying mixed-gas to a diver, is checked, prior to commencement of diving operations, at the umbilical or underwater breathing apparatus connection point for the diver, for percentage of oxygen.
§ 38.15-20 Remote shutdowns—TB/ALL. ( a ) All machinery associated with cargo loading, unloading, or cooling shall be capable of being shut down from a remote location. This location may be the station from which the cargo handling is controlled or such other location outside the cargo area as is acceptable to the Commandant.
( b ) [Reserved]
**EXHIBIT 99.7**I, O. Kim Goheen, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 40-F of Cameco Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. The issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and theaudit committee of issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 30, 2007           */s/ O. Kim Goheen*    O. Kim Goheen    Senior Vice-President &
#### CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE v. THOMPSON.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 5, 1912.)

No. 2,251.

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Florida.

E. P. Axtell and O. D. Rinehart, for plaintiff in error.

Wm. W. Dewhurst and George C. Bedel) (Horatio Bisbee, on the brief), for defendant in error.

Before PARDEE ami McCORMICK, Circuit Judges, and MAXEY, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

A majority of the judges are of opinion that the assignments of error based upon the six-months limitation found in the charter of the city of St. Augustine are not well taken. All agree that otherwise the case was correctly ruled, and should be affirmed; and it is so ordered.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2435 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2435

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the tax-free 
   treatment for distributions from individual retirement plans for 
                          charitable purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2009

  Ms. Kosmas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the tax-free 
   treatment for distributions from individual retirement plans for 
                          charitable purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``IRA Charitable Giving Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TAX-FREE DISTRIBUTIONS FROM INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT 
              PLANS FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSES.

    Subparagraph (F) of section 408(d)(8) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by striking ``December 31, 2009'' and inserting 
``December 31, 2010''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 201.111 Contents of order.

The order issued authorizing the taking of a deposition will state the name and address of each witness or a general description sufficient to identify him or the particular class or group to which he belongs, the matters concerning which the witness may be questioned, the place where, the time when, and the officer before whom the deposition is to be taken, any or all of which may or may not be the same as set forth in the motion filed. If the deposition is to be taken upon written interrogatories, a list of the interrogatories will accompany the order.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 

SOLUTIONS, U.S.A., INC., 

 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-11254 

 Honorable Victoria A. Roberts 

v. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford 

 

LOWERY CORPORATION d/b/a APPLIED 

IMAGING SYSTEMS, INC., et al., 

 

 Defendants. 

___________________________________/ 

ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTION [ECF No. 394] WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

 On June 21, 2019, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford entered an order 

granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff’s motion to compel. In relevant part, Judge 

Stafford held that no more requests for production of documents or interrogatories will be 

permitted except for discrete requests as follow-ups to depositions. 

 On July 5, 2019, the Individual Defendants filed an objection to that provision of 

the order; they say the limit on discovery should not apply to them, but only Applied 

Imaging, and they should be allowed to continue to submit requests for production and 

interrogatories to Plaintiff as they deem necessary. 

 In their objection, the Individual Defendants “submit that Judge Stafford likely did 

not intend for the Order to apply to them, but that [it] is unclear as written.” 

 Based on this statement, the Court finds that the appropriate action would be for 

the Individual Defendants to file a motion for clarification from Magistrate Judge Stafford. 

If Individual Defendants disagree with the clarification, they may renew their objection. 
2 

 If the Individual Defendants file renewed objections, they must set forth with 

particularity all written discovery they believe is outstanding and/or that they wish to 

request from Plaintiff. The deadline for fact discovery has passed. Discovery has been 

extended many times. Although Magistrate Judge Stafford is allowing depositions to 

proceed beyond the deadline and discrete post-deposition written discovery, this does 

not justify a broad license to continue fact discovery indefinitely. It is time for this case to 

proceed to the next stages, and Magistrate Judge Stafford’s limit on continued fact 

discovery appears reasonable. The Individual Defendants must make a substantial 

showing for this Court to find otherwise. 

The Individual Defendants’ objection is OVERRULED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

IT IS ORDERED. 

 S/ Victoria A. Roberts 

 Victoria A. Roberts 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: July 16, 2019