alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Resolutions of Board of Directors and Governance and Nominating Committee



 Exhibit 10(a) 
  
 Resolutions Adopted by the Board of Directors on January 25, 2005: 
  
 RESOLVED that effective January 1, 2005: 
  

	 	•	 	the fee for each Board and committee meeting, in person or by teleconference, be increased from $1,500 to $1,600; 

  

	 	•	 	the annual cash retainer fee paid to each director be increased from $50,000 to $65,000; 

  

	 	•	 	the annual cash retainer fee paid to the chair of the Audit and Examination Committee be increased from $20,000 to $25,000; 

  

	 	•	 	the annual cash retainer fee paid to the chair of the Human Resources Committee be increased from $10,000 to $20,000; and 

  

	 	•	 	the annual cash retainer fee paid to each of the chairs of the Credit, Finance, and Governance and Nominating Committees be increased from $10,000 to $15,000.


  
 Resolutions Adopted by the Governance and Nominating
Committee on January 25, 2005: 
  
 RESOLVED that effective
January 1, 2005, the Fair Market Value of the formula stock award payable under paragraph 1 of Section A of Article V of the Directors Stock Compensation and Deferral Plan (the “Plan”), to each Non-Employee Director who has served as a
director of the Company for at least the entire month of April in any year and is elected as a director at the annual meeting of stockholders held that year, shall be increased from $50,000 to $65,000. 
  
 RESOLVED that effective January 1, 2005, the Fair Market Value of the formula
stock award payable under paragraph 2 of Section A of Article V of the Plan, to each Non-Employee Director who first joins the Board after the annual meeting of stockholders in any year but on or before September 30 in such year, shall be increased
from $50,000 to $65,000. 
  
 RESOLVED that effective January 1,
2005, the Fair Market Value of the formula stock award payable under paragraph 3 of Section A of Article V of the Plan, to each Non-Employee Director who first joins the Board on or after October 1 in any year but on or before March 31 of the
following year, shall be increased from $25,000 to $32,500.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 69 (Wednesday, April 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18210-18214]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1789]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[DoD-2007-OS-0033]


U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Proposed Rules Changes

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Changes to the Rules of Practice and 
Procedure of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the following proposed changes to Rule 
24 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure, United States Court of 
Appeals for the Armed Forces for public notice and comment. New 
language is in bold print. Language to be deleted is marked by a 
strikethrough.

DATES: Comments on the proposed changes must be received by May 2007.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and or 
RIN number and title, by any of the fallowing methods:
    Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Following 
the instructions for submitting comments.
    Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160 Defense 
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number of Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for the 
Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other 
submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at http://regulations.gov as they are received without change, including personal 
identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William A. DeCicco, Clerk of the 
Court, telephone (202) 761-1448, ext. 600.

    Dated: April 5, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Liaison Officer, DoD.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 18211]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN11AP07.003


[[Page 18212]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN11AP07.004


[[Page 18213]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN11AP07.005


[[Page 18214]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN11AP07.006

[FR Doc. 07-1789 Filed 4-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C?>
# C_2014045EN.01001501.xml

| 15.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 December 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg — Austria) — Zentralbetriebsrat der gemeinnützigen Salzburger Landeskliniken Betriebs GmbH v Land Salzburg

(Case C-514/12) (1)

1

(Freedom of movement for workers - Article 45 TFEU - Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 - Article 7(1) - National legislation providing for account to be taken only of a proportion of the periods of service completed with employers other than Land Salzburg - Restriction of freedom of movement for workers - Justifications - Overriding reasons in the public interest - Objective of rewarding loyalty - Administrative simplification - Transparency)

2014/C 45/26

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landesgericht Salzburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Zentralbetriebsrat der gemeinnützigen Salzburger Landeskliniken Betriebs GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Land Salzburg

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Landesgericht Salzburg — Interpretation of Article 45 TFEU and Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (OJ 2011 L 141, p. 1) — Remuneration of contractual civil servants of a Member State — National legislation providing for account to be taken of all periods of service completed with a specific public employer, but for account to be taken of only a proportion of the periods of service completed after a certain age with other public or private employers.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 45 TFEU and Article 7(1) of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union must be interpreted as precluding national legislation under which, in determining the reference date for the purposes of the advancement of an employee of a local or regional authority to the next pay step in his grade, account is to be taken of all uninterrupted periods of service completed with that authority, but of only a proportion of any other periods of service.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 2.3.2013.

1

---
§ 169.642 Vital systems. For the purpose of this part, the following are considered vital systems— ( a ) A marine engineering system identified by the OCMI as being crucial to the survival of the vessel or to the protection of the personnel on board; and
( b ) On vessels greater than 120 feet in length— ( 1 ) Bilge system;
( 2 ) Ballast system;
( 3 ) Fire protection system;
( 4 ) Fuel oil system; and
( 5 ) Steering and steering control system.
#### § 185.530 Responsibilities of licensed individuals.

Nothing in the emergency instructions or a station bill required by this subpart exempts any licensed individual from the exercise of good judgment in an emergency situation.
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Stephen L. Day, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DOVER SADDLERY, INC.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 15, 2007 /s/  Stephen L. Day   Stephen L.  Day   President, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)
#### MARY BELAWSKY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. GEORGE N. THOMAS, DEFENDANT.

Argued October 2, 1929

Decided October 29, 1929.

Before Justices Parker, Black and Bodine. ..

Eor the plaintiffs, *Cole & Cole*and *Adolph Stern.*

Eor the defendant, *Leroy W. Loder.*

Per Curiam.

The complaint in this case charges the defendant, a practicing physician, with performing an operation upon Mary Belawsky without her consent and a further charge, that the operation was unskillfully and negligently performed. The trial resulted in a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiffs obtained a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted, alleging newly discovered evidence. This evidence was obtained by an autopsy, after the death of the plaintiff, Mary Belawsky. The autopsy revealed, so it is claimed, that no ventral suspension operation was done or performed. Evidence was taken under the rule which has been submitted to the court for our consideration. A reading of the evidence leads us to the conclusion that the rule should be discharged. The rules under which a new trial will be granted, on the ground of newly discovered evidence, are fully and quite thoroughly discussed in this court, in the case of *Hoban*v. *Sandford, &c., Co.,*64 *N. J. L.*426. Under that case we find no sufficient reason for disturbing the verdict of the jury.

The rule to show cause is therefore discharged.
§ 35.35-4 Insulating flange joint or nonconductive hose—TB/ALL. ( a ) A vessel's cargo hose string or vapor recovery hose must use an insulating flange or one continuous length of nonconductive hose between the vessel and the shore transfer facility. For each vapor recovery hose or cargo hose string, only one insulating flange or non-conductive hose must be provided. See 33 CFR 154.2101(g).
( b ) The insulating flange must be inserted at the jetty end and take all reasonable measures to ensure the connection will not be disturbed. The hose must be suspended to ensure the hose-to-hose connection flanges do not rest on the jetty deck or other structure that may render the insulating flange ineffective or short circuited by contact with external metal or through the hose handling equipment.
( c ) The insulating flange must be inspected and tested at least annually, or more frequently if necessary due to deterioration caused by environmental exposure, usage, and damage from handling. After installation, the insulation reading between the metal pipe on the shore side of the flange and the end of the hose or metal arm when freely suspended must not be less than 1,000 ohms. A suitable DC insulation tester must be used.
[USCG-1999-5150, 78 FR 42641, July 16, 2013]
to.D sraT

FS,

7

%tj .T qi ova

R. PRO'^^G

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 10

1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101-3140

December 5, 2013

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Final Review: "The Kent, Seattle, and Tacoma, WA, Second 10-Year Limited

Maintenance Plan for PM to"

FROM: Jeff Hunt, Air Quality Planner

TO: Debra Suzuki, Unit Manager

Air Programs Unit

In a letter dated November 20, 2013, from Kate Kelly, Director of the EPA Region 10 Office of

Air, Waste, and Toxics, the EPA stated:

We have reviewed the draft version of the Kent, Seattle, and Tacoma, WA, Second 10-

Year Limited Maintenance Plan for PM, 0 to identify potential deficiencies prior to final

submission for approval by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). We have

concluded that the draft version sent to the EPA on September 27, 2013, would likely be

approvable into the Washington State Implementation Plan. However, the EPA will

make a final decision based on our review of the complete State Implementation Plan that

is submitted following your public process and after consideration of any comments we

receive as part of the Environmental Protection Agency public process.

On November 29, 2013, the EPA received a final version of the State Implementation Plan (SIP)

revision submitted by the Department of Ecology (Ecology). Ecology received two comments

during the public comment period. The first comment related generally to the burning of coal in

Asia, but did not raise issues germane to the plan. The second comment requested that Ecology

expand the Kent maintenance area boundary to include their neighborhood and to revise the

current episodic burn ban program to a permanent ban on wood burning. I believe Ecology's

responses to both comments were appropriate and adequate, and Ecology made no changes to the

final plan as a result of the comments.

Based on my review of the final plan and the comments received, I recommend moving forward

a proposed approval based on the sample Federal Register notice included as part of the EPA's

November 20, 2013, review of the draft submission.

OFFICE OF

AIR. WASTE. AND TOXICS
SAT (concerns) (03/12/2015):

Analogs: 

Related Ca

Migration 

PBT rating: P2B1T2 

Health: 2 Inhalation 

Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 225 ppb), XB Testing 

(Testing desired)
# Loyalty Day, 2007

America was founded by patriots who risked their lives to bring freedom to our Nation. Today, our citizens are grateful for our Founding Fathers and confident in the principles that lead us forward. On Loyalty Day, we celebrate the blessings of freedom and remember our responsibility to continue our legacy of liberty. 

Our Nation has never been united simply by blood, birth, or soil, but instead has always been united by the ideals that move us beyond our background and teach us what it means to be Americans. We believe deeply in freedom and self-government, values embodied in our cherished documents and defended by our troops over the course of generations. Our citizens hold the truths of our founding close to their hearts and demonstrate their loyalty in countless ways. We are inspired by the patriotic service of the men and women who wear our Nation's uniform with honor and decency. The military spouses and families who stand by their loved ones represent the best of the American spirit, and we are profoundly grateful for their sacrifice. Our country is strengthened by the millions of volunteers who show deep compassion toward their neighbors in need. All citizens can express their loyalty to the United States by flying the flag, participating in our democracy, and learning more about our country's grand story of courage and simple dream of dignity. 

The Congress, by Public Law 85-529, as amended, has designated May 1 of each year as “Loyalty Day.” This Loyalty Day, and throughout the year, I ask all Americans to join me in reaffirming our allegiance to our Nation. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim May 1, 2007, as Loyalty Day. I call upon the people of the United States to participate in this national observance and to display the flag of the United States on Loyalty Day as a symbol of pride in our Nation.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirtieth  day of April, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 07-2218

Billing code 3195-01-P
# H o

# u l t 

# o n 

# Ba

# n d o ff 

# Ma

ll ii 

## se e tt II 

# n d ii 

## a n s Trr ii 

# b a ll 

## L a

# n d s 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 Miles



### Map Created by Christina Stringer February 

### 18 2013 Data Source Base 

### Map Bing Maps Tribal Boundaries 

## US 2010 Census Trust 

### Lands
§ 404.100 Ratemaking and annual reviews in general. ( a ) The Director establishes base pilotage rates by a full ratemaking pursuant to §§ 404.101 through 404.110, which is conducted at least once every 5 years and completed by March 1 of the first year for which the base rates will be in effect. Base rates will be set to meet the goal specified in § 404.1(a).
( b ) In the interim years preceding the next scheduled full rate review, the Director will adjust base pilotage rates by an interim ratemaking pursuant to §§ 404.101 through 404.110.
( c ) Each year, the Director will announce whether the Coast Guard will conduct a full ratemaking or interim ratemaking procedure.
[USCG-2017-0903, 83 FR 26193, June 5, 2018]
§ 194.15-5 Ventilation. ( a ) Operations, reactions or experiments which produce toxic, noxious or corrosive vapors shall be conducted under a suitably installed fume hood. The fume hood shall be equipped with an independent power exhaust ventilation system which terminates so as to prevent fumes from entering other portions of the vessel. The exhaust system of the fume hood shall be compatible with the ventilation system of the laboratory to prevent fumes from backing-up within the fume hood system. The terminals shall be equipped with acceptable flame screens.
( b ) Chemical laboratories shall be equipped with power ventilation system of the exhaust type serving the entire laboratory for use in the event of spills or other emergencies. The system shall have a capacity sufficient to effect a complete change of air in not more than 4 minutes based upon the volume of the compartment. ( 1 ) Power ventilation units shall have nonsparking impellers and shall not produce a source of vapor ignition in either the compartment or the ventilation system associated with the compartment.
( 2 ) The power ventilation system shall be interlocked with any other ventilation or air-conditioning system serving the laboratory in a manner to prevent the circulation of vapors to other spaces.
( 3 ) This ventilation system shall be independent of any other ventilation system in the vessel. It shall serve no other space. It shall be of watertight construction.
( 4 ) Ventilation exhaust outlets shall terminate more than 6 feet from any opening to the interior part of the vessel and from any possible source of vapor ignition.
( 5 ) The control for the power ventilation system shall be conveniently located and marked in a manner to clearly identify the purpose of the control.
( c ) Ventilation of air conditioning systems serving the chemical laboratory shall be designed so that air cannot be recirculated into an accommodation space.
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.503 Piping and piping system components: Protection from movement. Where thermal movement and movements of the cargo tank and the hull structure may cause stresses that exceed the design stresses, the piping and piping system components and cargo tanks must be protected from movement by: ( a ) Offsets;
( b ) Loops;
( c ) Bends;
( d ) Mechanical expansion joints including: ( 1 ) Bellows;
( 2 ) Slip joints;
( 3 ) Ball joints; or
( e ) Other means specially approved by the Commandant (CG-ENG).
[CGD 74-289, 44 FR 26009, May 3, 1979, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4782, Feb. 3, 1983]
#### The Westchester Gas-Light Company of the City of Yonkers, *Appellant, v.*The Yonkers Gas-Light Company, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.;

Dykman, J., not sitting.
Exhibit 23.1




                         Consent of Independent Auditors



The Board of Directors
Spurlock Industries, Inc.


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-09659 on Form S-8 of Spurlock Industries,  Inc. of our report dated February
12, 1999 relating to the  consolidated  balance  sheets of Spurlock  Industries,
Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and the related consolidated statements of
operations,  stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended, which
report  is  included  in this  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K for the year  ended
December 31, 1998 of Spurlock Industries, Inc.




/s/ Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P.
Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P.

Richmond, Virginia
March 25, 1999
# C_2013108EN.01001808.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/18

---

Order of the President of the Court of 8 January 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-48/12) (1)

1

2013/C 108/44

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 17.3.2012.

1

---
Exhibit 99.4
                             Selected Information
                      Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2000-A
                           through December 31, 2000
                    ----------------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

           Class A-1        Class A-2        Class A-3        Class A-4        Class A-5        Class B          Class C
           6.035%           6.217%           6.82%            7.09%            7.19%            7.37%            7.75%
           Asset            Asset            Asset            Asset            Asset            Asset            Certificates
           Backed           Backed           Backed           Backed           Backed           Backed
           Notes            Notes            Notes            Notes            Notes            Notes
           ------------     ------------     ------------     ------------     ------------     -----------      ------------



<S>        <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>               <C>            <C>

Principal
Paid       $155,000,000.00  $377,000,000.00  $287,892,371.43  $          0.00  $          0.00   $          0.00 $          0.00

Interest
Paid       $    906,389.79  $  7,804,792.76  $ 47,675,443.44  $ 50,309,458.33  $  8,973,072.07   $  5,320,812.42 $  3,197,473.50

---------------
Total Servicing Fees Paid:  $ 19,733,877.41



</TABLE>