Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 95 / Thursday, May 17, 2007 / Notices 27811 

Dated: May 9, 2007. 

Sara Hisel-McCoy, 

Acting Director, Collection Strategies 

Division. 

[FR Doc. E7–9504 Filed 5–16–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–8315–6] 

Clean Air Act Operating Permit 

Program; Petition To Object to Title V 

Permits for Potlatch Corporation’s 

Clearwater Wood Products Facility, 

Idaho Pulp and Paperboard Division, 

and Consumer Products Division, 

Lewiston, ID 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of final order on petition 

to object to state operating permits 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Clean Air Act 

(CAA) section 505(b)(2) and 40 CFR 

70.8(d), the EPA Administrator signed 

an order dated May 7, 2007, denying a 

petition to object to state operating 

permits issued by the Idaho Department 

of Environmental Quality to Potlatch 

Corporation’s Clearwater Wood 

Products Facility, Idaho Pulp and 

Paperboard Division, and Consumer 

Products Division, all located in 

Lewiston, Idaho (Potlatch permits). This 

order constitutes final action on the 

petition submitted by Mr. Mark 

Solomon, representing the Idaho 

Conservation League, Friends of the 

Clearwater, and himself, on February 7, 

2003, requesting that EPA object to the 

issuance of the Potlatch permits. 

Pursuant to section 505(b)(2) of the 

CAA, any person may seek judicial 

review in the United States Court of 

Appeals for the appropriate circuit 

within 60 days of this notice under 

section 307 of the CAA. 

ADDRESSES: Copies of the final order, the 

petition, and all pertinent information 

relating thereto are on file at the 

following location: Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 10, Office of 

Air, Waste, and Toxics (AWT–107), 

1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 

98101. The final order is also available 

electronically at the following Web site: 

http://www.epa.gov/region07/programs/ 

artd/air/title5/petitiondb/ 

petitiondb.htm. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Doug Hardesty, Office of Air, Waste and 

Toxics, EPA Region 10, telephone (208) 

378–5759, e-mail 

hardesty.doug@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Clean 

Air Act affords EPA a 45-day period to 

review and object to, as appropriate, 

operating permits proposed by state 

permitting authorities. Section 505(b)(2) 

of the CAA authorizes any person to 

petition the EPA Administrator within 

60 days after the expiration of this 

review period to object to a state 

operating permit if EPA has not done so. 

Petitions must be based only on 

objections to the permit that were raised 

with reasonable specificity during the 

public comment period provided by the 

state, unless the petitioner demonstrates 

that it was impracticable to raise these 

issues during the comment period or 

that the grounds for the objection or 

other issue arose after the comment 

period. 

On February 7, 2003, EPA received a 

petition from Mr. Mark Solomon, 

representing the Idaho Conservation 

League, Friends of the Clearwater, and 

himself, requesting that EPA object to 

the issuance of the Potlatch permits. 

The petition alleged that: (1) The three 

Potlatch divisions should be covered by 

a single Title V operating permit; and (2) 

IDEQ used the wrong model in 

determining the ambient air quality 

impacts of the Potlatch facilities. The 

order explains the reasons behind EPA’s 

decision to deny the petition for 

objection on all grounds. 

Ronald Kreizenbeck, 

Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 10. 

[FR Doc. 07–2439 Filed 5–16–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–M 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–8316–2] 

Gulf of Mexico Program Citizens 

Advisory Committee Meeting 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of meeting. 

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463), EPA 

gives notice of a meeting of the Gulf of 

Mexico Program (GMP) Citizens 

Advisory Committee (CAC). 

For information on access or services 

for individuals with disabilities, please 

contact Gloria Car, U.S.EPA, at (228) 

688–2421 or car.gloria@epa.gov. To 

request accommodation of a disability, 

please contact Gloria Car, preferably at 

least 10 days prior to the meeting, to 

give EPA as much time as possible to 

process your request. 

DATES: The meeting will be held on 

Tuesday, June 19, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 

4:30 p.m. and Wednesday, June 20, 

2007, from 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 

the River House, Stennis Space Center, 

Mississippi 39529, (228) 688–3726. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gloria D. Car, Designated Federal 

Officer, Gulf of Mexico Program Office, 

Mail Code EPA/GMPO, Stennis Space 

Center, MS 39529–6000 at (228) 688–

2421. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

proposed agenda includes the following 

topics: Gulf of Mexico Program Updates; 

Presentation on Liquified Natural Gas 

Facilities; Nature Conservancy 

Presentation; Priority Interests of the 

Citizens Advisory Committee; Citizens 

Advisory Committee membership 

status. 

The meeting is open to the public. 

Dated: May 10, 2007. 

Gloria D. Car, 

Designated Federal Officer. 

[FR Doc. E7–9505 Filed 5–16–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[MM Docket No. 93–8; DA 07–2005] 

Commission Seeks To Update the 

Record for a Petition for 

Reconsideration Regarding Home 

Shopping Stations 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the 

Commission seeks to update the record 

for a Petition for Reconsideration filed 

by the Center for the Study of 

Commercialism (CSC), concerning 

stations that air home shopping 

programming and their status. The 

Commission seeks comment on CSC’s 

argument that the Commission failed to 

consider in its public interest analysis 

the significant amount of commercial 

programming broadcast by home 

shopping stations; on the specific issues 

concerning how home shopping stations 

serve the people in their communities, 

including the elderly and homebound; 

on CSC’s assertion that the Commission 

failed to consider information relevant 

to one of three statutory factors, i.e., 

competing demands for the spectrum; 

and on CSC’s assertion that the Cable 

Act requires the Commission to 

consider non-broadcast uses in its 

analysis of competing demands for 

spectrum. The Commission would like 

to update the record for this proceeding 

before ruling on the petition. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES