alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,323                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       59                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,463                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,149                       0
<PP&E>                                           9,668                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,561)                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,653                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,038                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               84                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            91                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,785                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,653                       0
<SALES>                                            637                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   637                       0
<CGS>                                              312                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      312                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,682                   7,466
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 377                     856
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,128)                 (8,120)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,128)                 (8,120)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,181)                 (8,149)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.42)                  (1.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.42)                  (1.39)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading

# TIME AND DATE:

11 a.m., Friday, February 2, 2007.

# PLACE:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Surveillance Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-225 Filed 1-17-07; 11:27 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
[Civ. No. 11155.

First Appellate District, Division Two.

June 29, 1939.]

#### ARTHUR H. DeGUIRE, Appellant, v. THE POLICE COMMISSION OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Respondents.

Hubbard & Hubbard for Appellant.

John J. O’Toole, City Attorney, and Walter A. Dold, Chief City Attorney, for Respondents.

SPENCE, J.

This is a companion case to *Christal*v. *Police Commission,*Civil Number 11003 *(ante,*p. 564 [92 Pac. (2d) *577416]), and *Roche*v. *Police Commission,*Civil Number 11002 *(ante,*p. 574 [92 Pac. (2d) 422]), the opinions in which last-named cases have been this day filed. It is submitted upon the same record as the Christal case. Appellant relies in part upon the points raised in the companion cases but as to said points, no further discussion is required.

In this case, appellant had refused to be sworn before the grand jury but, at a later date and after he had been ordered to do so by the superior court, he submitted to examination before that body. Thereafter he was tried before the police commission and was dismissed from the police department. He appeals from the judgment of the superior court which denied him any relief.

We find no headings in appellant’s brief other than “Statement of Pacts” and “Argument”. Such headings do not show “the nature of the question to be presented or the point to be made”. (Rule VIII, sec. 2, Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal.) The only point which appellant apparently seeks to raise, in addition to those points raised in the companion eases, is that he should not have been dismissed for his refusal to testify before the grand jury as he acted upon the advice of counsel. Appellant cites no authority to show the materiality of the fact that he acted upon the advice of counsel and we know of none. It is entirely probable that some of the officers involved in the companion cases likewise acted upon the advice of counsel but their refusal to testify nevertheless constituted a violation of their duty as police officers and conduct unbecoming police officers. The police commission had the power to dismiss said officers for such violation of duty, and there is nothing to show that it abused its discretion in so doing.

The judgment is affirmed.

Nourse, P. J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Joyce Reece and Zachary Pettit

Appellate case number: 01-21-00014-CV

Trial court case number: 2017-49867

Trial court: 281st District Court of Harris County

Relators, Joyce Reece and Zachary Pettit, have filed a petition for a writ of 

mandamus. The Court requests a response to the petition from the real party in interest. 

The response, if any, is due to be filed with this Court no later than 20 days of the date 

of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _____/s/ April Farris_____

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___January 21, 2021____
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2344 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2344

 To amend section 114 of title 17, United States Code, to provide for 
agreements for the reproduction and performance of sound recordings by 
                              webcasters.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2009

 Mr. Inslee (for himself, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Boucher, Ms. Zoe Lofgren of 
  California, and Ms. Eshoo) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 114 of title 17, United States Code, to provide for 
agreements for the reproduction and performance of sound recordings by 
                              webcasters.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Webcaster Settlement Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF AGREEMENTS.

    Section 114(f)(5) of title 17, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ``2008'' and inserting 
        ``2008, the Webcaster Settlement Act of 2009,'';
            (2) in subparagraph (E)(iii), by striking ``to make 
        eligible nonsubscription transmissions and ephemeral 
        recordings''; and
            (3) in subparagraph (F), by striking ``February 15, 2009'' 
        and inserting ``at 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on the 30th day 
        after the date of the enactment of the Webcaster Settlement Act 
        of 2009''.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 22, 2019

izm

Order 

Clerk

July 22, 2019

159845 (6)

RANDY HOLLOWAY, 

Plaintiff, 

v SC: 159845

AGC: 16-1322 

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, 

Defendant. __________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the June 26, 

2019 order is denied because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously. 

Within 21 days of the date of this order, Plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of the Court the 

initial partial filing fee of $21.00; submit a copy of the June 26, 2019 order; and refile a 

copy of the pleadings as ordered. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the 

administrative dismissal of Appellant’s appeal.
2 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on July 29, 2019, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (810) 341-9764
#### Oliver French, *Respondent, v.*Harlow C. Le Roy, *Appellant*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Hardin, J.
# Dutch-American Friendship Day, 2007

On Dutch-American Friendship Day, we celebrate our longtime friendship with the Kingdom of the Netherlands and honor the many Dutch Americans who have made significant contributions to our country. 

Our close partnership with the Netherlands dates back to the founding of our Nation, and it remains among our oldest continuous relationships. Many of the Pilgrims first sailed for the New World from a Dutch port, and when a small American warship approached the island of St. Eustatius in 1776, the Dutch port there gave the American flag its first friendly gun salute. A few years later, the Netherlands became one of the first nations to recognize the independence of the United States of America. The United States and the Netherlands are continuing that tradition of close cooperation in the 21st century, working together to bring hope and liberty to places where it has long been denied. 

Dutch Americans have enriched the American experience and have helped write our history, strengthen our character, and shape our society. Today, we pay tribute to our allies in the Netherlands and recognize the proud citizens of Dutch ancestry who call America home. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim April 19, 2007, as Dutch-American Friendship Day. I encourage all Americans to celebrate our country's Dutch heritage and the many ways Dutch Americans have strengthened our Nation. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this nineteenth day of April, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 07-2058

Billing code 3195-01-P
§ 28.390 Means of escape. ( a ) Each space which is used by an individual on a regular basis or which is generally accessible to an individual must have at least two widely separated means of escape. At least one of the means of escape must be independent of watertight doors. Subject to the restrictions of this section, means of escape include normal exits and emergency exits, passageways, stairways, ladders, deck scuttles, and windows.
( b ) At least one of the means of escape from each space must provide a satisfactory route to weather.
( c ) Each door, hatch or scuttle used as a means of escape must be capable of being opened by one individual, from either side, in both light and dark conditions, must open towards the expected direction of escape from the space served, and if a watertight door be of the quick acting type.
( d ) Each deck scuttle which serves as a means of escape, must be fitted with a quick-acting release and a device to hold the scuttle in an open position.
( e ) Each foothold, handhold, ladder, or similar structure, provided to aid escape, must be suitable for use in emergency conditions and must be of rigid construction.
( f ) A window or windshield of sufficient size and proper accessibility may be used as one of the required means of escape from an enclosed space.
[CGD 88-079, 56 FR 40393, Aug. 14, 1991, as amended by USCG-2008-0906, 73 FR 56509, Sept. 29, 2008]
# C_2013367EN.01001901.xml

| 14.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/19

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție — Romania) — Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală v SC Rafinăria Steaua Română SA

(Case C-431/12) (1)

1

(Taxation - Value added tax - Refund of excess VAT by set-off - Annulment of set-off decision - Obligation to pay default interest to the taxable person)

2013/C 367/32

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală

Applicant:

Defendant: SC Rafinăria Steaua Română SA

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție — Interpretation of Article 183 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1) — Refund of excess VAT by set-off — Obligation on the tax authorities to pay default interest where the set-off decisions are annulled by a court

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 183 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as precluding a situation in which a taxable person, having made a claim for refund of excess input value added tax over the value added tax which it is liable to pay, cannot obtain from the tax authorities of a Member State default interest on a refund made late by those authorities in respect of a period during which administrative measures precluding the refund, which were subsequently annulled by a court ruling, were in force.

---

(1)  OJ C 399, 22.12.2012.

1

---
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   Exhibit 99.1


                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT


To the Board of Directors of Fifth Third Bank and
Harris Trust and Savings Bank, Trustee

We have examined the accompanying management assertion (Attachment A) about
Fifth Third Bank's (the "Bank") compliance with the minimum servicing standards
identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, except for standards I4, III3, III4,
III6, V2, V3, V4, VII1 which are not applicable, as of December 31, 1996 and for
the period from September 25, 1996 to December 31, 1996, pursuant to the Pooling
and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 25, 1996. Management is
responsible for the Bank's compliance with those applicable minimum servicing
standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Bank's compliance with the
applicable minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as
we consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Bank's compliance with minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Bank complied with the
applicable aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of December 31, 1996
and for the period from September 25, 1996 to December 31, 1996 is fairly
stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche, LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio
March 7, 1997


<PAGE>   2


                                                                   Attachment A


March 5, 1997

Deloitte & Touche, LLP
250 East Fifth Street
P.O. Box 5340
Cincinnati, Ohio  45201-5340


As of December 31, 1996 and for the period from September 25, 1996 to December
31, 1996, Fifth Third Bank (the "Bank") has complied in all material respects
with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers, to the extent that such servicing standards are applicable to the
servicing obligations pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as
of September 25, 1996.

Due to the nature of the above mentioned trust, minimum servicing standards I4,
III3, III4, III6, V2, V3, V4, VII1 are not applicable and, accordingly, the Bank
has not made an attempt to comply with those standards.

Sincerely,

Fifth Third Bank


/s/ P. Michael Brumm
-------------------------------
P. Michael Brumm, Executive Vice President

/s/ Roger Dean
-------------------------------
Roger Dean, Controller
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

IRON WORKERS’ LOCAL NO. 25 PENSION 

FUND; IRON WORKERS’ UNION NO. 25 

INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT RETIREMENT FUND; 

IRON WORKERS’ HEALTH FUND OF 

EASTERN MICHIGAN; IRON WORKERS’ 

LOCAL NO. 25 VACATION PAY FUND; and 

IRON WORKERS’ APPRENTICESHIP FUND OF 

EASTERN MICHIGAN, Trust Funds Established 

and Administered Pursuant to Federal Law, 

 Plaintiffs, Case No.: 2:02-cv-72744 

 Hon. Terrence G. Berg 

v. 

TOWER STEEL ERECTORS, INC., a 

Michigan Corporation; and JOHN 

WARDELL, an Individual, 

 

 Defendants. 

_______________________________________/ 

AsherKelly, PLLC 

DAVID J. SELWOCKI (P51375) 

MATTHEW I. HENZI (P57334) 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

25800 Northwestern Hwy., Suite 1100 

Southfield, MI 48075 

(248) 746-2759 

dselwocki@asherkellylaw.com

mhenzi@asherkellylaw.com

______________________________________/ 

 

ORDER OF RENEWED JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS 

TOWER STEEL ERECTORS, INC. AND JOHN WARDELL 

 This matter having come before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Ex-Parte Motion 

Case 2:02-cv-72744-TGB ECF No. 82, PageID.104 Filed 03/17/23 Page 1 of 2
2 

to Renew Judgment against Defendants Tower Steel Erectors, Inc. and John 

Wardell, and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order of Renewed Judgment by 

Default entered on March 22, 2013 is hereby renewed and entered against 

Defendants Tower Steel Erectors, Inc. and John Wardell in the amount of 

$78,521.67, for the remaining balance on the Judgment plus Judgment interest. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/s/Terrence G. Berg_________________ 

 HON. TERRENCE G. BERG 

 United States District Court Judge 

Dated: March 17, 2023 

 

W2619381.DOC 

Case 2:02-cv-72744-TGB ECF No. 82, PageID.105 Filed 03/17/23 Page 2 of 2
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 6
Federal Reserve Bank of: Atlanta

## Filings received during the week ending August 5, 2006

|Filer                               | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|ORION BANK                          | * Branch       | Orion Bank, Naples, Florida, to establish a branch located at 1715 Cape Coral Parkway West, Cape Coral, Florida.                                                                   | Newspaper:08/14/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                          | 08/14/2006    
|Federal Register:                   | Not applicable
|PIEDMONT COMMUNITY BANK GROUP, INC. | * 3A1          | Piedmont Community Bank Group, Inc., Gray, Georgia, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the outstanding shares of Piedmont Community Bank, Gray, Georgia. | Newspaper:08/12/2006Federal Register:08/31/2006    
|Newspaper:                          | 08/12/2006    
|Federal Register:                   | 08/31/2006    
|SUNTRUST BANK                       | * Branch       | SunTrust Bank, Atlanta, Georgia, to establish a branch located at 15225 Collier Boulevard, Naples, Florida, to be known as the Pebblebrooke Office.                                | Newspaper:08/11/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                          | 08/11/2006    
|Federal Register:                   | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us