alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2321 

To continue the application of certain procedures in the House of Representatives applicable to Medicare funding legislation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2009 

Mr. BRADY of Texas (for himself, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BOUSTANY, Ms. 

GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida, Ms. FALLIN, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, 

Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. HERGER, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. 

LAMBORN, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. 

OLSON, Mr. PENCE, Mr. PITTS, Mrs. SCHMIDT, Mr. SHADEGG, and Mr. 

SHIMKUS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Rules 

A BILL 

To continue the application of certain procedures in the 

House of Representatives applicable to Medicare funding 

legislation, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Warning Act 

5 of 2009’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2321 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONTINUED APPLICATION OF MEDICARE-RELATED 

2 PROVISION. 

3 Section 803 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Im4 provement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 

5 108–173) shall apply during the remainder of the One 

6 Hundred and Eleventh Congress (notwithstanding section 

7 3(e) of House Resolution 5 of the One Hundred Eleventh 

8 Congress, as adopted on January 6, 2009). 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2423 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2423

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, as the ``George P. Kazen 
 Federal Building and United States Courthouse'', and to designate the 
jury room in that Federal building and United States courthouse as the 
                   ``Marcel C. Notzon II Jury Room''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2009

  Mr. Cuellar (for himself, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, and Mr. McCaul) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, as the ``George P. Kazen 
 Federal Building and United States Courthouse'', and to designate the 
jury room in that Federal building and United States courthouse as the 
                   ``Marcel C. Notzon II Jury Room''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BUILDING DESIGNATION.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building and United States courthouse 
located at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``George P. Kazen Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building and 
United States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 
to be a reference to the ``George P. Kazen Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. JURY ROOM DESIGNATION.

    (a) Designation.--The jury room located in the Federal building and 
United States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be known and 
designated as the ``Marcel C. Notzon II Jury Room''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the jury room referred 
to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Marcel 
C. Notzon II Jury Room''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect on the first day on which George P. 
Kazen is no longer serving as a Federal judge.
                                 <all>
```
§ 28.205 Fireman's outfits and self-contained breathing apparatus. ( a ) Each vessel that operates with more than 49 individuals on board must be equipped with at least two fireman's outfits stowed in widely separated locations.
( b ) Each vessel that uses ammonia as a refrigerant must be equipped with at least two self-contained breathing apparatuses.
( c ) A fireman's outfit must consist of one self-contained breathing apparatus with lifeline attached, one flashlight, a rigid helmet, boots, gloves, protective clothing, and one fire axe.
( d ) At least one spare air bottle must be provided for each self-contained breathing apparatus.
( e ) Each self-contained breathing apparatus must be approved by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) and by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), have as a minimum a 30 minute air supply, and a full facepiece.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0001007020
<NAME> INTEGRATED SYSTEMS CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                             517
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,230
<ALLOWANCES>                                       215
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,626
<PP&E>                                           1,540
<DEPRECIATION>                                     853
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,558
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,877
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            35
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,333
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,558
<SALES>                                          7,065
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,065
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,603
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,484
<INCOME-TAX>                                       683
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                846
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       846
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01

                      WORLDTALK COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Worldtalk Corporation:

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-32925) on Form S-8 of Worldtalk Corporation of our report dated February 3,
1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Worldtalk Corporation and
subsidiary as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, and the
related schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 1997, annual report
on Form 10-K of Worldtalk Corporation.

                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Mountain View, California
March 27, 1998

                                        2
#### § 221.83 Witnesses.

A Party may present the testimony of any witness either through a personal appearance or through a written statement. The Party may request the assistance of the Hearing Officer in obtaining the personal appearance of a witness. The request must be in writing and state the reasons why a written statement would be inadequate, the issue or issues to which the testimony would be relevant, and the substance of the expected testimony. If the Hearing Officer determines that the personal appearance of the witness may materially aid in the decision on the case, the Hearing Officer will seek to obtain the witness' appearance. The Hearing Officer may move the hearing to the witness' location, accept a written statement, or accept a stipulation in lieu of testimony.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>             5
<MULTIPLIER>          1,000
<CURRENCY>            US DOLLARS

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          15,168
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       24
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        297
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,714
<PP&E>                                           3,239
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,249
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,291
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              916
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          3
<COMMON>                                            71
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,284
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,291
<SALES>                                             64
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    64
<CGS>                                              245
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,058
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,330)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        88
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,418)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,418)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.78)




</TABLE>
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2168 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to suspend the penalty on 

underpayments of Federal income tax for unemployed individuals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2009 

Mr. DUNCAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to suspend 

the penalty on underpayments of Federal income tax 

for unemployed individuals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF PENALTY ON UNDERPAY4 MENTS OF FEDERAL INCOME TAX FOR UNEM5 PLOYED INDIVIDUALS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6662 of the Internal Rev7 enue Code of 1986 (relating to imposition of accuracy-re8 lated penalty on underpayments) is amended by adding 

9 at the end the following new subsection: 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2168 IH

1 ‘‘(f) SUSPENSION OF PENALTY FOR UNEMPLOYED

2 INDIVIDUALS.—In the case of an individual who receives 

3 unemployment compensation (as defined in section 85(b) 

4 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) during a taxable 

5 year beginning in 2008 or 2009, subsection (a) shall not 

6 apply with respect to any underpayment of tax required 

7 to be shown on the return for such taxable year unless 

8 such underpayment is still outstanding on the date which 

9 is 2 years after the due date (including extensions) for 

10 filing such return.’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

13 December 31, 2007. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

------------------------------------------------------x 

RS INTERNATIONAL LLC, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 - against - 

 

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et ano., 

 

 Defendants. ORDER

------------------------------------------------------x 

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 14-CV-6371 (ILG) (RER) 

 

 Counterclaim-Plaintiff, 

 - against - 

RS INTERNATIONAL LLC, 

 Counterclaim-Defendant. 

------------------------------------------------------x 

GLASSER, Senior United States District Judge: 

 Plaintiff RS International LLC (“RS”) brings this action against the Ford Motor 

Company (“Ford”) and Premier Ford NY, Inc. (“Premier”; together, “defendants”), 

alleging that they violated Section 43 of the Lanham Act, codified at 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), 

and New York General Business Law (“GBL”) § 349 by using RS’s “ROYAL SHIELD” 

trademark in connection with extended warranty services. Pending before the Court is 

defendants’ unopposed motion for (1) partial summary judgment as to all claims against 

Premier and the GBL claim against Ford and (2) transfer of venue to the district court in 

either the Eastern District of Michigan (where Ford is headquartered) or the District of 

Massachusetts (where RS is headquartered). 

 The Court has reviewed the evidence submitted in support of defendants’ motion 

and determined that they have met their burden of establishing that they are entitled to 

2:15-cv-11114-VAR-RSW Doc # 3 Filed 03/25/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 29
2 

the relief that they seek as a matter of law for the reasons they have set forth in their 

papers. See Vt. Teddy Bear Co. v. 1-800 BEARGRAM Co., 373 F.3d 241, 243-44 (2d Cir. 

2004). The motion is therefore GRANTED. All claims against Premier and the GBL 

claim against Ford are dismissed. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and in the interest of 

justice, the Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this case to the United States District 

Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in accordance with the procedures set forth in 

Local Civil Rule 83.1 and to close the matter here as soon as that transfer is complete. 

 SO ORDERED. 

Dated: Brooklyn, New York 

 March 23, 2015 

 /s/ 

 I. Leo Glasser 

 Senior United States District Judge 

2:15-cv-11114-VAR-RSW Doc # 3 Filed 03/25/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 30
#### KATHERINE B. WOOLLEY, PLAINTIFF, v. MEYER TRAUB ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Decided November 8, 1929.

Before Gummebe, Chief Justice, and Justices Kalisch and Campbell.

Eor the rule, *Howard Ewart.*

Contra, *Harry E. Newman.*

Pee Cubiam.

Plaintiff brought suit to recover compensation for injuries received by her in a collision between a car of the defendant Nisselson, which was being driven by the other defendant Traub, and a car belonging to one Pearl, in which she was riding when the collision occurred. The trial resulted in a *1000verdict in her favor, the jury awarding her $500. Considering this award grossly inadequate, she applied to the trial court of a rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside and a new trial granted with respect to damages only. This application was granted and a rule to that effect was entered.

The only matter before us under the limitation of the rule is whether or not the plaintiff’s contention is justified. The proofs satisfy us that it is, and that a new trial should be ordered because of the gross inadequacy of the verdict. It is of course settled that this court is not bound by the limitations contained in the rule to show cause, but we see no reason for directing a new trial upon the whole case.

The rule to show cause will be made absolute, and the new trial limited to the question of the compensation to which the plaintiff is entitled, by reason of her injuries.
#### § 30.01-15 Effective date of regulations—TB/ALL.

The regulations in this subchapter are not retroactive in effect unless specifically made so at the time the regulations are issued. Changes in specification requirements of articles of equipment, or materials used in construction of tank vessels, shall not apply to such items which have been passed as satisfactory until replacement shall become necessary, unless a specific finding is made that such equipment or material used is unsafe or hazardous and has to be removed from tank vessels.

[CGFR 65-50, 30 FR 16657, Dec. 30, 1997, as amended by CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51197, Sept. 30, 1997]
# C_2011211EN.01003401.xml

| 16.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/34

---

Action brought on 23 May 2011 — ZZ v European Investment Bank

(Case F-58/11)

2011/C 211/69

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant(s): ZZ (represented by: B. Cortese, C. Cortese and F. Spitaleri, lawyers)

Applicant(s):

Defendant: European Investment Bank

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decisions of the EIB to increase the contributions of the applicants to the pensions system, and reparation of the non-material harm suffered by the applicants.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decisions of the European Investment Bank as set out in the applicants’ salary slips for February 2011, which increase the applicants’ contribution to the pensions system, by increasing the basis for calculation (the salary subject to deduction) of that contribution, on the one hand, and of the calculation coefficient, expressed as a percentage of that salary subject to deduction, on the other. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decisions of the European Investment Bank as set out in the applicants’ salary slips for February 2011, which increase the applicants’ contribution to the pensions system, by increasing the basis for calculation (the salary subject to deduction) of that contribution, on the one hand, and of the calculation coefficient, expressed as a percentage of that salary subject to deduction, on the other.

| — | Order the Bank to pay a symbolic sum of EUR 1, by way of compensation for the non-material harm suffered by the applicants; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Bank to pay a symbolic sum of EUR 1, by way of compensation for the non-material harm suffered by the applicants;

| — | Order the European Investment Bank to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Investment Bank to pay the costs.

---
§ 197.205 Availability of standards. ( a ) Several standards have been incorporated by reference in this subchapter. The incorporation by reference has been approved by the Director of the Federal Register under the provisions of 1 CFR part 51.
( b ) The standards are available from the appropriate organizations whose addresses are listed below: ( 1 ) American National Standards Institute, 11 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036.
( 2 ) American Society of Mechanical Engineers, United Engineering Center, 345 East 47th Street, New York, NY 10017.
[CGD 76-009, 43 FR 53683, Nov. 16, 1978, as amended by CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50735, Sept. 27, 1996]
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


Vincam Human Resources, Inc.
Vincam Human Resources, Inc. I
Vincam Human Resources, Inc. II
Vincam Human Resources, Inc. III
Vincam Human Resources, Inc. IV
Vincam Human Resources, Inc. V
Vincam Human Resources, Inc. VI
Vincam Human Resources, Inc. XII
Vincam Human Resources of Michigan, Inc.
Vincam Occupational Health Systems, Inc.
Personnel Resources, Inc.
Vincam Insurance Services, Inc.
Vincam Practice Management, Inc.
American Pediatric Systems, Inc.
Psych/Care, Inc.
Vincam/Staff Administrators, Inc.(Colorado company, doing business as Staff
Administrators, Inc.)
Vincam/Staff Administrators of Western Colorado, Inc. (Colorado company, doing
business as Staff Administrators of Western Colorado, Inc.)
Staff Administrators of CO, Inc. (Colorado company)
Staff Administrators of California, Inc. (Colorado company)

---------
Unless otherwise indicated, the companies listed above are incorporated in
Florida.
§ 126.250 Period of validity for a Certificate of Inspection. ( a ) A Certificate of Inspection is valid for 5 years.
( b ) A Certificate of Inspection may be suspended and withdrawn or revoked by the cognizant OCMI at any time for noncompliance with the requirements of this subchapter or other applicable laws.
[CGD 82-004 and CGD 86-074, 62 FR 49324, Sept. 19, 1997, as amended by USCG-1999-4976, 65 FR 6505, Feb. 9, 2000]
Unassociated Document


Advaxis, Inc.

212 Carnegie Center, Suite 206

Princeton, NJ 08540











                                                                                 January 12, 2005




Mr. Robert Harvey

c/o Harvest Advaxis, LLC

30052 Aventura, Suite C

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688




Dear Robert:

 



This will confirm the agreement of Advaxis, Inc., a Colorado Corporation (the “Company”) to grant your request to be allowed to participate as an observer at all meetings of the Board of Directors including receipt of written documents, reports and presentations provided to the Directors of the Company and to receive copies of written consents of the Directors at the time presented to the Directors for their consideration. Your participation as an observer is based the desire of the Company to have the benefit of your financial sophistication and experience in connection with a
proposed financing of the Company through the offering and sale of its equity or debt of the Company. 




Your participation however is based on your understanding that as an observer you will be subject to the same limitations and obligations to which the Directors are subject with respect to confidentiality of information and with respect to transactions in the securities of the Company.




You shall be responsible for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by you in connection with your attendance at the meetings of the Board as an observer.




Your right to be an observer shall terminate on August 31, 2005 unless on or before that date Harvest Advaxis, LLC (“Harvest”) invests an additional $5 million of equity capital in the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, the Company shall not be required to accept an equity investment from Harvest or any other investor, on certain terms or any terms; provided, however that upon mutual agreement of Company and you, in writing, the term of this agreement may extend for an additional one year period.





	
	 	 	 
	





	 



If the foregoing correctly sets forth our agreement kindly execute, at the place indicated, and return a copy of this letter



 


 


	 	 	Very truly yours 	 
	 	 	/s/ J. Todd Derbin              	 
	 	 	J. Todd Derbin 	 
	 	 	
President and Chief Executive Officer
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Agreed and accepted: 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	By: /s/ Robert Harvey                     	 	 	 
	Robert Harvey