alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, DanielDrummond, Chief Excecutive Officer of UAGH, Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)

the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter endedSeptember 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and

(2)

theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

Date:   November 12, 2009

*/s/ Daniel Drummond        *

Daniel Drummond

Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act hasbeen furnished to UAGH, Inc. and will be retained by UAGH, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
#### Mary Wood Currie and another, *Respondents, v.*Robert H. Riley and another, *Appellants*.

Judgment modified as directed in opinion, and affirmed as modified. Opinion

*Per Curiam.*
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 21.1




                         List of Subsidiaries of Issuer


                                                           Percentage of Shares
                                                              Owned by Issuer
                                                          ----------------------

Micro-Filtration, Inc.; incorporated in Michigan                   100%
Numation  Inc.; incorporated in Michigan                            90%
Numatech Inc.; incorporated in Michigan                             88%
I.A.E. Incorporated; incorporated in Michigan                      100%
Ultra Air Products, Inc.; incorporated in Michigan                 100%
Microsmith, Inc.; incorporated in Arizona                          100%
Numatics B.V.; organized in the Netherlands                        100%
Numatics S.A. de C.V.; organized in Mexico                          99%
Numatics S.A.R.L.; organized in France                              99%
Numatics Ltd.; organized in the United Kingdom                      99%
Numatics Ltd.; organized in Canada                                 100%
NAC Beteilingungs GmbH; organized in Germany                       100%
Numatics GmbH; organized in Germany                                100%
Numatics K.F.T.; organized in Hungary                              100%
Numatics Ltd; organized in Taiwan                                   91%
Numatics S.R.L.; organized in Italy                                 99%
Empire Air Systems, Inc.; incorporated in New York                 100%
Numatics Spain S.L.; organized in Spain                            100%
Exhibit 21 - Subsidiaries of Affinity Technology Group, Inc.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                      <C>                                 <C>
                     Name                         Jurisdiction of Incorporation           Percent Owned
--------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- ---------------------------

    Affinity Bank Technology Corporation                 Delaware, USA                       100%

     Affinity Clearinghouse Corporation                  Delaware, USA                       100%

         Affinity Credit Corporation                     Delaware, USA                       100%

       Affinity Processing Corporation                   Delaware, USA                       100%

  Affinity Mortgage Technology Corporation               Delaware, USA                       100%

            decisioning.com, Inc.                        Delaware, USA                       100%

       Multi Financial Services, Inc.                    Delaware, USA                       100%
</TABLE>


                                       48
Exhibit 32


Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") by Nevstar Gaming and
Entertainment, Inc. the undersigned hereby certifies that:

       1.    The Report complies in all material respects with the requirements
             of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
             as amended, and

       2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Registrant.


                                        /s/ William O. Fleischman
                                        ___________________
                                        Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
§ 197.456 Breathing supply hoses. ( a ) The diving supervisor shall insure that— ( 1 ) Each breathing supply hose is pressure tested prior to being placed into initial service and every 24 months thereafter to 1.5 times its maximum working pressure;
( 2 ) Each breathing supply hose assembly, prior to being placed into initial service and after any repair, modification, or alteration, is tensile tested by— ( i ) Subjecting each hose-to-fitting connection to a 200 pound axial load; and
( ii ) Passing a visual examination for evidence of separation, slippage, or other damage to the assembly;
( 3 ) Each breathing supply hose is periodically checked for— ( i ) Damage which is likely to affect pressure integrity; and
( ii ) Contamination which is likely to affect the purity of the breathing mixture delivered to the diver; and
( 4 ) The open ends of each breathing supply hose are taped, capped, or plugged when not in use.
( b ) To meet the requirements of paragraph (a)(3) of this section, each breathing supply hose must be— ( 1 ) Carefully inspected before being shipped to the dive location;
( 2 ) Visually checked during daily operation; and
( 3 ) Checked for noxious or offensive odor before each diving operation.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

vs Case No: 15-10993

Honorable Victoria A. Roberts

UNIVERSAL REHAB SERVICES, INC.,

PHYSIOFLEX, PLLC, AHMAD T.

ABULABON, P.T., SUMMIT MEDICAL

GROUP, PLLC and DAVID JANKOWSKI, D.O.,

Defendants.

______________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION

Defendants Universal Rehab Services, Inc.’s (“Universal”), PhysioFlex, PLLC

(“PhysioFlex”), and Ahmad Abulabon’s (collectively, the “Universal Defendants”) filed a

Motion for Extension of Time To Respond to State Farm’s Discovery Requests (Doc.

#59). Plaintiff responded. The Court held a telephone status conference on January 7,

2015. Attending were Kathy Josephson, Andrew Welker and Thomas Cranmer

representing the Plaintiff; Gerard Mantese and Alex Blum representing the Universal

Defendants and Peter Joelson and Gary Blumberg representing Defendants Summit

Medical and David Jankowski, D.O.

Based on the discussion held, the Motion is GRANTED.

The Universal Defendants must serve their responses to all pending State Farm

discovery requests on or before January 25, 2016.

If objections are contained in the responses, the Universal Defendants must state

1

2:15-cv-10993-VAR-APP Doc # 62 Filed 01/08/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1634
completely the basis for the objections. Boilerplate objections will not be acceptable.

IT IS ORDERED.

 /s/ Victoria A. Roberts 

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

Dated: January 8, 2016

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this

document was served on the attorneys of

record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

January 8, 2016.

s/Linda Vertriest 

Deputy Clerk

2

2:15-cv-10993-VAR-APP Doc # 62 Filed 01/08/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1635
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 1997
FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,785
<SECURITIES>                                    40,752
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,279
<ALLOWANCES>                                       375
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,001
<PP&E>                                           4,436
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,407
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,365
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,407
<SALES>                                         36,543
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,543
<CGS>                                           19,703
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,703
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,042
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,744
<INCOME-TAX>                                       583
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,161
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,161
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25


</TABLE>
THC MACT FLOOR ANALYSES

Company Location Kiln Average Kiln Type In-line raw millTXI Midlothian Kiln 5 5.83 preheater/calciner yesHolcim Trident Kiln #1 5.69 wet noSuwannee Branford, FL Kiln 5.68 preheater/calciner yesHolcim Mason City Kiln #3 10.90 long dry noLehigh Union Bridge E02-001 4.69 preheater/calciner yesHolcim Mason City Kiln #2 11.07 long dry noTitan Pennsuco Kiln 12.81 preheater/calciner yesTitan Roanoke, VA Kiln 5 12.93 preheater/calciner yesHolcim Theodore, AL Kiln #1 23.74 preheater/calciner yesHolcim Portland, CO Kiln #4 44.97 preheater/calciner yesHolcim Midlothian, TX Kiln #1 51.59 preheater/calciner yesHolcim Devil's Slide, UT Kiln #1 51.91 preheater/calciner yesHolcim Midlothian, TX Kiln #2 62.82 preheater/calciner yesHolcim Dundee

Kiln #1 and Kiln #2 Combined 748.15 wet no
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending February 18, 2006

----

Regulations And PoliciesNontraditional Mortgage Products  -- extension to March 29, 2006, of the comment period on proposed interagency guidance on nontraditional residential mortgage products.					-Announced, February 17, 2006 					Regulation Y  -- final amendments to increase the asset-size threshold for defining small bank holding companies and to modify the criteria for determining eligibility under the Board's small bank holding company policy statement and capital guidelines (Docket No. R-1235).					-Approved, February 16, 2006 					

Testimony And StatementsMonetary Policy Objectives  -- statement by Chairman Bernanke before the House Committee on Financial Services, February 15, and the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, February 16, 2006.					-Authorized, February 13, 2006 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: February 23, 2006
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1
 PRG-SCHULTZ INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 SUBSIDIARIES
 Company
    
    Jurisdiction of OrganizationPRG-Schultz USA, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaThe Profit Recovery Group Asia, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG-Schultz Australia, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG-Schultz Belgium, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG-Schultz Canada, LLC
    
    GeorgiaThe Profit Recovery Group Costa Rica, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaThe Profit Recovery Group New Zealand, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaThe Profit Recovery Group Netherlands, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaThe Profit Recovery Group Mexico, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG-Schultz France, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaThe Profit Recovery Group Germany, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaThe Profit Recovery Group South Africa, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG-Schultz Switzerland, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaThe Profit Recovery Group Italy, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaThe Profit Recovery Group Spain, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG-Schultz Portugal, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG International, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG USA, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG-Schultz Scandinavia, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG-Schultz Japan, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG-Schultz Puerto Rico, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG-Schultz Chile, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG-Schultz Europe, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaThe Profit Recovery Group Holdings Mexico, S de RL de CV
    
    MexicoThe Profit Recovery Group Servicios Mexico S de RL de CV
    
    MexicoThe Profit Recovery Group de Mexico S de RL de CV
    
    MexicoThe Profit Recovery Group Argentina S.A.
    
    ArgentinaPRG do Brasil Ltda.
    
    BrazilPRG-Schultz International PTE LTD
    
    SingaporePRG-Schultz Suzhou Co Ltd.
    
    ChinaPRG International CR s.r.o.
    
    Czech RepublicPRGFS, Inc.
    
    DelawareHS&A Acquisition  UK Inc.
    
    TexasMeridian Corporation Limited
    
    Jersey (Channel Islands)Tamebond Limited
    
    United KingdomJA Ewing, Inc.
    
    New YorkPRG-Schultz Ireland LTD
    
    IrelandPRG-Schultz UK Ltd.
    
    United KingdomPRG-Schultz Canada Corp.
    
    CanadaPRG-Schultz (Deutschland) GmbH
    
    GermanyPRG-Schultz Nederland B.V.
    
    Netherlands




---



##### 



Company
    
    Jurisdiction of OrganizationPRG-Schultz Italia SRL
    
    ItalyPRG-Schultz Puerto Rico
    
    Puerto RicoPRG-Schultz Peru S.R.L.
    
    PeruPRG-Schultz Colombia Ltda
    
    ColumbiaPRG-Schultz Svenska A. B.
    
    SwedenPRG-Schultz Venezuela S. R. L.
    
    VenezuelaPRG-Schultz Polska Sp. Zo. O.
    
    PolandHoward Schultz & Associates (Asia) Limited
    
    Hong KongHS&A International PTE LTD
    
    SingaporePRG-Schultz (Thailand) Co., Limited
    
    ThailandHoward Schultz de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoPRGDS, LLC
    
    GeorgiaPRGTS, LLC
    
    Georgia
#### Cornelius Fonda, *Landlord, etc., Respondent v.*Frank S. Peters, *Tenant, etc., Appellant*.

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
PCD INC.'S FORM 10-K FOR PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY FROM REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             652
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     7198
<ALLOWANCES>                                       367
<INVENTORY>                                       5479
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 15052
<PP&E>                                           29089
<DEPRECIATION>                                   11547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  114786
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            27962
<BONDS>                                          28800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            86
<OTHER-SE>                                       57938
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    114786
<SALES>                                          51838
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 51838
<CGS>                                            27983
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    27983
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 18219
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4591
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1078
<INCOME-TAX>                                       399
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                679
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       679
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08


</TABLE>
§ 140.670 Use of auto pilot. Except for towing vessels in compliance with requirements in 33 CFR 164.13(d), when an automatic pilot is used in areas of high traffic density, conditions of restricted visibility, or any other hazardous navigational situations, the master must ensure that: ( a ) It is possible to immediately establish manual control of the ship's steering;
( b ) A competent person is ready at all times to take over steering control; and
( c ) The changeover from automatic to manual steering and vice versa is made by, or under, the supervision of the officer in charge of the navigational watch.
#### Amanda Lakey, Appellant, *v.*Lewis Scott, *Respondent, Impleaded,*etc.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, WA 98101-3140

OFFICE OF ECOSYSTEMS, TRIBAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS 

### CERTIFIED MAIL
- RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Paul Henson, State Supervisor U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office' 2600 S.E. 98thAve, Ste 100 Portland, OR97266
Re: Request for Concurrence from USFWS on EPA Determination that Site Designation of the Siuslaw River Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Sites is ''Not Likelyto Adversely Affect" Listed Threatened orEndangered Species
DearMr. Henson: The U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency (EPA), Region 10, has had an opportunity to examine whether its proposed action to designate two ocean dredged material disposal sites pursuant to Section 102(c) ofthe Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act, as amended (MPRSA), 33 U.S.C. §§ 1401 to 1445, nearthe mouth ofthe Siuslaw River offthe coast of Oregon will impact species listed as endangered orthreatened pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531 to 1544. Based onthe ;;tttached Biological Assessment, EPA, Region 10, has determined that the proposed action to designate the Siuslaw Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Sites will not likely adversely affect designated species under USFWSjurisdiction occurringinthe area oradversely impact designated critical habitat for those species. For a complete species list, please referto Table 1 ofthe attached Biological Assessment. EPA, Region 10, requests your written concurrence that its proposed actionto designate the Siuslaw Ocean Dredged Material Disposal sites is not likelyto adversely affect listed threatened or endangered species under USFWSjurisdiction. EPA, Region 10, is also enclosing a draft ofthe Site Management and Monitoring Plan (SMMP) for your infonnation.
We are available for discussion ofthe topics and issues raised in this letter. Ifyou should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call JessicaWinklerofmy staffat (206) 553-7369. Sincerely,



# ;;WA/J4 {;r Richard B. Parkin, Acting Director Office ofEcosystems, Tribal and Public Affairs
Enclosures
§ 169.111 Administrative procedures. ( a ) Upon receipt of a written application for inspection, the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection assigns a marine inspector to inspect the vessel at a mutually agreed upon time and place.
( b ) The owner or a representative shall be present during the inspection.
( c ) If during the inspection, the vessel or its equipment is found not to conform to the requirements of law or the regulations in this subchapter, the marine inspector lists all requirements which have not been met and presents the list to the owner or a representative.
( d ) In any case where the owner of a vessel or his representative desires further clarification of, or reconsideration of any requirement placed against his vessel, he may discuss the matter with the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.34


                  SHARE (SYUSSHI-MOCHIBUN) ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT


GungHo Online Entertainment, Inc. (hereinafter called the "the Assignor") and
Gravity Corporation (hereinafter called the "Assignee") made and entered into
this Agreement as follows:

     The Assignor has agreed to transfer thirty (30) shares (syusshi-mochibun)
of RO Production Co., Ltd (hereinafter called the "RO") without compensation,
and the Assignee has agreed to receive the shares in accordance with the terms
and conditions defined as follows:

     1.   Shares Price: Yen 0 (One(1) share: Yen 0)

     2.   No later than Oct 31, 2004 the Assignor shall transfer the thirty (30)
          shares (syusshi-mochibun) of RO Production Co., Ltd. to the Assignee.

     3.   In case that the share transferring successes between the parties, the
          Assignor shall report in an official form within 24 hours to ROP with
          the fixed date for share transferring to the Assignee, and also shall
          submit the copied document(s) to the Assignee.

     4.   In case that the Assignor fails executing the above mandatory report
          within the designated period of times, subrogating the Assignor, the
          Assignee may make such report(s) with the Assignor's name on, and may
          report to ROP. The Assignor shall not claim for such activities to be
          done by the Assignee.

In witness whereof, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
in duplicate.



Date: October 25, 2004
Assignor: GungHo Online Entertainment, Inc.
Principal Office: 16, Kanda-Nishikicho 1-Chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan
By: /s/ Kazuki Morishita
Name: Kazuki Morishita
Title: Representative Director


Assignee: Gravity Corporation
Principal Office: 6F, Shingu Bldg., 620-2, Shinsa-Dong, Kangnam-Ku,
Seoul, 135-894, Korea
By: /s/ Richard Hyonkook Kim
Name: Richard Kim
Title: Representative Director