alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Morrison Health Care, Inc.
  
  Exhibit 23            Consent of Independent Auditors
  
  
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
  10-K) of Morrison Health Care, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated
  June 19, 1997, included in the 1997 Annual Report to Stockholders of
  Morrison Health Care, Inc. and Subsidiaries.
  
  Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Morrison
  Health Care, Inc. and Subsidiaries listed in Item 14(a).  This schedule
  is the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility
  is to express an opinion based on our audits.  In our opinion, the
  financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in
  relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents
  fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
  
  We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
  Statements of Morrison Health Care, Inc. and Subsidiaries listed below
  of our report dated June 19, 1997, with respect to the consolidated
  financial statements incorporated herein by reference, and our report
  included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial
  statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
  Morrison Health Care, Inc. and Subsidiaries.
  
  
  
    -Registration  Statement No. 333-2098 on Form S-8 dated March 8, 1996
      and related Prospectus
    -Registration  Statement No. 333-2100 on Form S-8 dated March 8, 1996
      and related Prospectus
    -Registration  Statement No. 333-2102 on Form S-8 dated March 8, 1996
      and related Prospectus
    -Registration  Statement No. 333-2104 on Form S-8 dated March 8, 1996
      and related Prospectus
    -Registration  Statement No. 333-2106 on Form S-8 dated March 8, 1996
      and related Prospectus
    -Registration  Statement No. 333-2108 on Form S-8 dated March 8, 1996
      and related Prospectus
    -Registration  Statement No. 333-4504 on Form S-8 dated May 3, 1996
      and related Prospectus
    -Registration  Statement No. 333-4508 on Form S-8 dated May 3, 1996
      and related Prospectus
    -Registration  Statement No. 333-20197 on Form S-8 dated January 22, 1997
      and related Prospectus



  /s/Ernst & Young LLP
          
  August 20, 1997
  Atlanta, Georgia
Editorial Note on Part 162
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 162.060-14 Information requirements for the ballast water management system (BWMS) application. ( a ) A complete BWMS application must contain all of the following information: ( 1 ) The name and location of the independent laboratory conducting approval tests and evaluations.
( 2 ) Two sets of plans describing the BWMS, as specified in 46 CFR 159.005-12.
( 3 ) An Operation, Maintenance, and Safety Manual for the BWMS that meets the requirements in § 162.060-38 of this subpart.
( 4 ) A bill of materials showing all components and specifications of the BWMS.
( 5 ) A list of any systems or components of the BWMS that may require certification as marine portable tanks.
( 6 ) A list of any pressure vessels used as a part of the BWMS, along with a description of the pressure vessel building standard, or code, or why the pressure vessel should be considered exempt from any requirements. Manufacturers must also submit detailed pressure vessel plans if they intend to fabricate pressure vessels, heat exchangers, evaporators, and similar appurtenances.
( 7 ) Documentation of all necessary approvals, registrations, and other documents or certifications required for any active substances, preparations, or relevant chemicals used by the BWMS. The documentation must include the following: ( i ) A list of any active substances, preparations, or relevant chemicals that are used, produced, generated as a byproduct, and/or discharged in association with the operation of the BWMS.
( ii ) A list of all limitations or restrictions that must be complied with during the approval testing and evaluations, including any water quality limits established by the Environmental Protection Agency, States, or tribes, under the Clean Water Act.
( 8 ) A detailed description of Quality Control procedures, in-process and final inspections, tests followed in manufacturing the item, and construction and sales record keeping systems.
( 9 ) The completed Test Report required by § 162.060-34 of this subpart prepared and submitted by the IL.
( b ) The completed application must be sent by the manufacturer to the Commanding Officer (MSC), Attn: Marine Safety Center, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7430, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7430, or by email to *msc@uscg.mil ”.*.
( c ) If examination of the application reveals that it is incomplete, the Coast Guard will return it to the applicant with an explanation.
( d ) Additional information, including electronic submission criteria, is available at *http://homeport.uscg.mil/msc .*
[USCG-2001-10486, 77 FR 17311, Mar. 23, 2012, as amended by USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60161, Sept. 30, 2013; USCG-2016-0498, 82 FR 35093, July 28, 2017; USCG-2018-0874, 84 FR 30883, June 28, 2019]
# C_2013055EN.01001301.xml

| 23.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/13

---

Order of the General Court of 18 December 2012 — Hungary v Commission

(Case T-320/11) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Point from which time starts to run - Out of time - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 55/23

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hungary (represented by: M. Fehér, K. Szíjjártó and K. Veres, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. von Rintelen and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision 2011/192/EU of 28 March 2011 excluding from EU financing certain expenditure incurred by Hungary under the programme for the support for pre-accession measures for agriculture and rural development (Sapard) in 2004 (OJ 2011 L 81, p. 14).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Hungary is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Hungary is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.

1

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 15-CR-20126-001

 vs. HON. ARTHUR J. TARNOW

FADI HASSAN HAMMOUD,

Defendant.

______________________________/

EXHIBITS TO 

DEFENDANT, FADI HASSAN HAMMOUD’S,

SENTENCING MEMORANDUM

A. Letter from CPA, Carl Masi

B. Letter from Hassan F. Hammoud

C. Letter from Maya Makhzoum

D. Letter from Fadia Moussa

E. Letter from Ibrahim Tanana

F. Letter from Robert Ankeny

Case 2:15-cr-20126-AJT-APP ECF No. 26-1 filed 05/15/17 PageID.115 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT ITEM 31.2**

 

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

 

I,Bruce N. Warner certify that:

 

1.         I have read this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Northern CaliforniaBancorp, Inc.;

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4.         The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;

 

b)             evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period (the “EvaluationDate”); and

 

c)              presented in this annual report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.         The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee or registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

a)              all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identifiedfor the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)             any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and

 

 
| Date: March 23, 2006 | /s/ Bruce N. Warner           |   |
|----------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                 | Bruce N. Warner               |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer & |
|                 | Principal  Accounting Officer |

 

----
# C_2013071EN.01001602.xml

| 9.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2013 — Germans Boada v OHIM (Manual tile-cutting machine)

(Case T-25/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for a Community three-dimensional mark - Manual tile-cutting machine - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Lack of distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Articles 75 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009 - Equal treatment)

2013/C 71/24

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Germans Boada, SA (Rubí, Spain) (represented by: J. Carbonell Callicó, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 October 2010 (Case R 771/2010-1), relating to an application for registration of the three-dimensional sign representing a manual tile-cutting machine as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Germans Boada, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Germans Boada, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 12.3.2011.

1

---
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending November 5, 2005

----

Board OperationsDivision of Information Technology  -- appointment of Jill Coss Rosen as Assistant Director with oversight for a new branch, National Information Center Systems.					-Approved, October 25, 2005 					(AC)Equal Employment Opportunity  -- publication for comment of an interim rule to amend the Board's Rules Regarding Equal Opportunity to clarify the limitations on the employment of noncitizens in positions having access to sensitive information (Docket No. OP-1239).					-Approved, October 19, 2005 					(AC)Office of Board Members  -- appointment of Brian J. Gross as Special Assistant to the Board for Congressional Liaison.					-Approved, October 31, 2005 					

Discount RatesDiscount and Advance Rates  -- increase in the primary credit rate from 4-3/4 percent to 5 percent by twelve Federal Reserve Banks.					-Approved, November 1, 2005 					

Reserve Bank ServicesFederal Reserve Priced Services  -- private sector adjustment factor for 2006.					-Approved, November 2, 2005 					Federal Reserve Priced Services  -- 2006 fee schedules for priced services and electronic access.					-Approved, November 2, 2005 					

Testimony And StatementsEconomic Outlook  -- statement by Chairman Greenspan before the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress.					-Published, November 3, 2005 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: November 10, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 12 (Friday, January 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-208]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM


Senior Executive Service: Performance Review Board Members

AGENCY: Selective Service System.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the appointment of members of the 
Selective Service System (SSS) Performance Review Board (PRB).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Verona C. Ballard, Human Resources 
Division, Selective Service System, 1515 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 
22207, 703-605-4040.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 5 CFR 430.310 requires each agency to 
establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of 
Personnel Management, one or more Senior Executive Service (SES) 
performance review boards. The board reviews and evaluates the initial 
appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the supervisor, and 
considers recommendations to the appointing authority regarding the 
performance of the senior executive. Because the SSS is a small 
independent Federal agency, the members of the SSS's PRB are being 
drawn from other Federal agencies.
    The following executives have been appointed to the SSS Performance 
Review Board:

Lawrence Roffee, Executive Director, US Access Board;
Gary Thatcher, Associate Director, International Broadcast Bureau;
Debra Carr, Associate Deputy Staff Director, US Commission on Civil 
Rights.

    Dated: January 16, 2007.
William A. Chatfield,
Director.
[FR Doc. 07-208 Filed 1-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8015-01-M
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Keith Schonerstedt

, * From the 104 th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 2 2911 B

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 1

- 00 18 6

- CR * February 3 , 20 2 2

The State of Texas

, * Per Curiam Memorand um Opinion

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has considered Keith Schonerstedt’s motion to dismiss this appeal

and concludes that the motion should be granted

. Therefore, in accordance with

this court ’ s opi nion, the appeal is dismissed

.
# C_2013225EN.01003202.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/32

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 May 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria — Hungary) — Alakor Gabonatermelő és Forgalmazó Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Észak-alföldi Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága

(Case C-191/12) (1)

1

(Non-repayment of the entirety of value added tax unduly paid - National legislation precluding repayment of VAT because it has been passed on to a third party - Compensation in the form of aid covering a fraction of the non-deductible VAT - Unjust enrichment)

2013/C 225/54

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Kúria

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Alakor Gabonatermelő és Forgalmazó Kft.

Applicant:

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Észak-alföldi Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Kúria Budapest — Interpretation of European Union law relating to the common system of value added tax — Deduction of input VAT — Aid from State funds for an acquisition of goods, also financing the non deductible VAT on the acquisitions — National legislation precluding repayment of tax on the ground that it has been passed on to a third party

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The principle of repayment of taxes levied in a Member State in infringement of the rules of EU law must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude that State from refusing to repay part of the value added tax, the deduction of which had been precluded by a national measure contrary to European Union law, on the ground that that part of the tax had been subsided by aid granted to the taxable person and financed by the European Union and by that State, provided that the economic burden relating to the refusal to deduct value added tax has been completely neutralised, which is for the national court to determine.

---

(1)  OJ C 243, 11.8.2012.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5

<S>                                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                      2,116,016
<SECURITIES>                                                1,474,949
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 818,720
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  105,076
<INVENTORY>                                                 1,224,532
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            6,479,980
<PP&E>                                                      8,681,723
<DEPRECIATION>                                              5,759,953
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             13,129,528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       1,842,742
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                        3,196
<OTHER-SE>                                                 10,667,784
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               13,129,528
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            2,874,901
<CGS>                                                       2,262,468
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              15,341,287
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              754,940
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           (371,750)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (12,094,636)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (12,094,636)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (12,094,636)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (0.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (0.41)





</TABLE>
§ 194.15-17 Compressed gases other than inert gases. ( a ) When, in consideration for a particular operation, compressed gases are needed within the laboratory, the cylinders may be temporarily installed in the laboratory, provided no more than one (1) cylinder of each gas is in the laboratory simultaneously. When transporting compressed gas cylinders to, from, or within the vessel, the cylinder valves shall be capped or otherwise protected in accordance with 49 CFR 173.301(g).
( b ) Cylinders temporarily installed in the laboratory shall be securely stowed for sea. Appropriate safety signs shall be displayed and safety precautions observed.
( c ) Oxygen and acetylene cylinders for use in ship's maintenance shall not be stored in the laboratory.
( d ) Systems providing gas for Bunsen burners or similar semipermanent/permanent installations shall be installed in accordance with subpart 195.03 of part 195.
[CGFR 67-83, 33 FR 1151, Jan. 27, 1968, as amended by CGD 86-033, 53 FR 36027, Sept. 16, 1988; USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58289, Sept. 29, 2014]
§ 189.40-1 Definitions relating to hull examinations. As used in this part— ( a ) *Drydock examination* means hauling out a vessel or placing a vessel in a drydock or slipway for an examination of all accessible parts of the vessel's underwater body and all through-hull fittings.
( b ) *Internal structural examination* means an examination of the vessel while afloat or in drydock and consists of a complete examination of the vessel's main strength members, including the major internal framing, the hull plating, voids, and ballast tanks, but not including cargo or fuel oil tanks.
( c ) *Underwater survey* means the examination, while the vessel is afloat, of all accessible parts of the vessel's underwater body and all through-hull fittings.
[CGD 84-024, 52 FR 39656, Oct. 23, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 32232, Aug. 24, 1988; CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51220, Sept. 30, 1997]