alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In early July, new U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency 

regulations will be in effect in 

all states, regulating the export 

of spent lead acid batteries 

(SLABs).

The new requirements will apply 

to all U.S. auto battery recyclers 

and brokers that export SLABS, 

as described below: 

EPA530-F-10-007

April 2010

More information is available 

online at: 

http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/

hazard/international/oecd-slabrule.htm

ATTENTION 

AUTO BATTERY 

RECYCLERS & BROKERS

 • Guidance on preparing and 

 submitting notifi cations to export 

 SLABs for recycling 

 • Frequently asked questions

 • Final rule 

EPA contact: 

Laura Coughlan

Coughlan.Laura@epa.gov

• Starting on July 7, 2010, export shipments 

of SLABs will be PROHIBITED unless 

the exporter has 1) submitted a written 

notification to EPA and 2) obtained the 

receiving country’s consent.

• SLAB exporters are encouraged to 

submit notifications to EPA by early May or 

sooner if possible to avoid potential delays 

to export shipments. 

• EPA encourages exporters to allow 

sufficient time for the prospective 

country of import to review the proposed 

shipments. Some countries may receive a 

significant number of SLAB notifications 

and processing delays may occur.

EPA encourages recyclers and brokers to 

begin the notification process as soon as 

possible to ensure full compliance with the 

new requirements.
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Sterling H. McDonald, Chief Financial Officer of Evolution
Petroleum Corporation (the "Company"), certifies in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report")") pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley
Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
27th day of September, 2006.


                                                     /s/ STERLING H. McDONALD
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                         Sterling H. McDonald
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
# C_2014024EN.01001902.xml

| 25.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 December 2013 — JAS v Commission

(Case T-573/11) (1)

1

(Customs union - Imports of denim jeans - Fraud - Recovery a posteriori of the import duties - Article 13 of Regulation (EEC) No 1430/79 - Article 239 of the Customs Code - Application for remission of import duties - Particular case - Equity clause - Commission Decision)

2014/C 24/33

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: JAS Jet Air Service France (JAS) (Mesnil-Amelot, France) (represented by: T. Gallois and E. Dereviankine, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B.-R. Killmann, L. Keppenne and C. Soulay, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission Decision of 5 August 2011 finding that the remission of import duties is not justified in a particular case (Case REM 01/2008).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Jet Air Services France (JAS) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Jet Air Services France (JAS) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael C. Frederick, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                                                            
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|DATE: August 11, 2010 |  |  |  | BY: |  | /s/ Michael C. Frederick                                   
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Michael C. Frederick                                       
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand Treasurer
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
```

[111th Congress Public Law 214]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 2346]]

Public Law 111-214
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the 
 Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and 
       for other purposes. <<NOTE: July 30, 2010 -  [H.R. 5849]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF 
                              PROGRAMS UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS 
                              ACT AND THE SMALL BUSINESS 
                              INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958.

    (a) In General.--Section 1 of the Act entitled ``An Act to extend 
temporarily certain authorities of the Small Business Administration'', 
approved October 10, 2006 (Public Law 109-316; 120 Stat. 1742), as most 
recently amended by section 1 of Public Law 111-162 (124 Stat. 1129), is 
amended by striking ``July 31, 2010'' each place it appears and 
inserting ``September 30, 2010''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on July 30, 2010.

    Approved July 30, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5849:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            July 27, considered and passed House and Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 193.15-30 Alarms. ( a ) Space normally accessible to persons on board while the vessel is being navigated which are protected by a carbon dioxide extinguishing system and are required to be fitted with a delayed discharge system other than paint and lamp lockers and similar small spaces, shall be fitted with an approved audible alarm which will be automatically sounded when the carbon dioxide is admitted to the space. The alarm shall be conspicuously and centrally located and shall be marked as required by § 196.37-9 of this subchapter. Such alarms shall be so arranged as to sound during the 20-second delay period prior to the discharge of carbon dioxide into the space, and the alarm shall depend on no source of power other than the carbon dioxide.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS LEGEND CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                          10,530
<SECURITIES>                                     8,491
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,516
<ALLOWANCES>                                       286
<INVENTORY>                                         15
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,031
<PP&E>                                           9,836
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,445
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,514
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,497
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            70
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,574
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,514
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,886
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,034
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    64
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 221
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,216
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,553
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,663
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,663
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56


</TABLE>
# C_2013063EN.01001901.xml

| 2.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 January 2013 — Solar-Fabrik v OHIM (Premium XL and Premium L)

(Joined Cases T-582/11 and T-583/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Applications for the Community word marks Premium XL and Premium L - Absolute grounds for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 63/37

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Solar-Fabrik AG für Produktion und Vertrieb von solartechnischen Produkten (Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany) (represented by: M. Douglas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Two actions brought against two decisions of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 September 2011 (Case R 245/2011-1 and Case R 246/2011-1 respectively), concerning applications for registration as Community trade marks of the word sign Premium XL and the word sign Premium L respectively

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Joins Cases T-582/11 and T-583/11 for the purposes of the judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Joins Cases T-582/11 and T-583/11 for the purposes of the judgment;

| 2. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the actions;

| 3. | Orders Solar-Fabrik AG für Produktion und Vertrieb von solartechnischen Produkten to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Solar-Fabrik AG für Produktion und Vertrieb von solartechnischen Produkten to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.

1

---
# C_2013189EN.01002002.xml

| 29.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2013 — Iran Transfo v Council

(Case T-392/11) (1)

1

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment)

2013/C 189/40

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Iran Transfo (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: K. Kleinschmidt, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and J.-P. Hix, agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and T. Scharf, agents)

Re:

Re:

Annulment of Council Decision 2011/299/CFSP of 23 May 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 136, p. 65), in so far as that decision concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Council Decision 2011/299/CFSP of 23 May 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran, in so far as it concerns Iran Transfo; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Council Decision 2011/299/CFSP of 23 May 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran, in so far as it concerns Iran Transfo;

| 2. | Orders the effects of Decision 2011/299, in so far as it concerns Iran Transfo, to be maintained for a period which may not exceed two months and ten days from the date of delivery of this judgment; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the effects of Decision 2011/299, in so far as it concerns Iran Transfo, to be maintained for a period which may not exceed two months and ten days from the date of delivery of this judgment;

| 3. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Iran Transfo; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Iran Transfo;

| 4. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 290, 1.10.2011.

1

---
# C_2014135EN.01000501.xml

| 5.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 March 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif de Grenoble — France) — Margaretha Bouanich v Direction départementale des finances publiques de la Drôme

(Case C-375/12) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 63 TFEU - Free movement of capital - Article 49 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Tax on income of natural persons - Mechanism capping direct taxes by reference to income - Bilateral tax agreement for avoidance of double taxation - Taxation of dividends distributed by a company established in another Member State and already subject to a withholding tax - Failure to take into account or partial taking into account of the tax paid in the other Member State for the calculation of the tax cap - Article 65 TFEU - Restriction - Justification))

2014/C 135/05

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal administratif de Grenoble

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Margaretha Bouanich

Applicant:

Defendant: Direction départementale des finances publiques de la Drôme

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal administratif de Grenoble — Interpretation of Articles 49, 63 and 65 TFEU — National legislation on personal income tax imposing a cap on the proportion of direct tax payable by a taxpayer — Mechanism known as the ‘bouclier fiscal’ (tax shield) — Bilateral tax convention — Taxation of dividends distributed by a company established in another Member State and already subject to a withholding tax — Sums deducted at source partially taken into account for the calculation of the tax cap — Justification of such legislation on the grounds of the cohesion of the tax system, a balanced allocation of taxing powers between the Member States, or any other overriding reason in the public interest.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 49 TFEU, 63 TFEU and 65 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State under which, where a resident of that Member State who is a shareholder of a company established in another Member State receives dividends taxed in the two Member States and the double taxation is regulated by the imputation in the Member State of residence of a tax credit of an amount corresponding to the tax paid in the State of the distributing company, a mechanism capping various direct taxes at a certain percentage of income received during a year does not take into account, or takes only partially into account, the tax paid in the State of the distributing company.

---

(1)  OJ C 319, 20.10.2012.

1

---
§ 181.420 Pre-engineered fixed gas fire extinguishing systems. ( a ) A pre-engineered fixed gas fire extinguishing system must: ( 1 ) Be approved by the Commandant;
( 2 ) Be capable of manual actuation from outside the space in addition to automatic actuation by a heat detector;
( 3 ) Automatically shut down all power ventilation systems and all engines that draw intake air from within the protected space; and
( 4 ) Be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
( b ) A vessel on which a pre-engineered fixed gas fire extinguishing system is installed must have the following equipment at the operating station: ( 1 ) A light to indicate discharge;
( 2 ) An audible alarm that sounds upon discharge; and
( 3 ) A means to reset devices used to automatically shut down ventilation systems and engines as required by paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
( c ) Only one pre-engineered fixed gas fire extinguishing system is allowed to be installed in each space protected by such a system.
Exhibit 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Affinity  Technology  Group,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-K for the period ended  December 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Joseph A.  Boyle,  President,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ Joseph A. Boyle
Joseph A. Boyle
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer
      and Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2008


                                       51
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

Pasquale Longordo, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CBC Settlement Funding, LLC 

and Asta Funding, Inc., 

Defendants. 

________________________________/

Case No. 14-cv-14370 

Hon. Judith E. Levy 

Mag. Judge Mona K. Majzoub 

STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

This matter having been amicably resolved between the parties 

and the Court being fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above entitled cause of action 

is dismissed in its entirety as to all Defendants, with prejudice and 

without costs to any party. 

The Court retains jurisdiction only for the purposes of enforcing 

the settlement in this matter. This Order resolves all pending claims 

and closes the case. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5:14-cv-14370-JEL-MKM Doc # 13 Filed 06/10/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 63
Dated: June 10, 2015 s/Judith E. Levy 

Ann Arbor, Michigan JUDITH E. LEVY 

United States District Judge 

5:14-cv-14370-JEL-MKM Doc # 13 Filed 06/10/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 64
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 11 (Thursday, January 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-215]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Notice

Date and Time: Friday, January 26, 2007, 9 a.m.

Place: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Rm. 540, 
Washington, DC 20425.

Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda.
II. Approval of Minutes of December 14, Meeting.
III. Announcements.
IV. Adjourn.

Briefing Agenda

No Child Left Behind and Supplemental Educational Services.
    <bullet> Introductory Remarks by Chairman.
    <bullet> Speakers' Presentation.
    <bullet> Questions by Commissioners and Staff Director.

Contact Person for Further Information: Manuel Alba, Press and 
Communications, (202) 376-8582.

Kenneth L. Marcus,
Staff Director.
[FR Doc. 07-215 Filed 1-16-07; 3:03 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

JOHN P. GREINER, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cv-13979 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

CHARTER COUNTY OF MACOMB, 

MICHIGAN, a/k/a MACOMB COUNTY, et al., 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER TO APPEAR FOR HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL’S 

EMERGENCY MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY (ECF #91) 

On February 3, 2017, counsel for Plaintiff John P. Greiner filed an Emergency 

Motion for Withdrawal of Counsel (ECF #91). 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that counsel for the parties shall appear at the 

United States District Court, Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse, 231 W. Lafayette 

Blvd., Courtroom 237, Detroit, Michigan, on Wednesday, March 1, 2017 at 2:00 

p.m. for a hearing on plaintiff’s counsel’s motion. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Lance Mason shall serve a copy of this 

Order on Plaintiff by regular mail (and e-mail, if available) and shall file proof of 

such service with the Court. 

2:14-cv-13979-MFL-RSW Doc # 92 Filed 02/15/17 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1772
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff, John P. Greiner shall 

personally appear at the hearing on March 1, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: February 15, 2017 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on February 15, 2017, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113 

2:14-cv-13979-MFL-RSW Doc # 92 Filed 02/15/17 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1773
###### Editorial Note on Part 164

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 164.013-4 Samples submitted for acceptance.

*Application samples.* A product sample submitted for acceptance as required by § 164.019-7(c)(4) must consist of at least one square foot by the thickness of foam produced.