alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dismissed; Opinion Filed June 27, 2019.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00374
- CV
JOHN CHARLES SEGOVIA , Appellant

V. PAMELA DIBBLES , Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 18
- 06003
- E 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Carlyle The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this cas e are past due. By postcard
dated March 29, 2019, w e notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appe al. Also by postcard dated March 29, 2019, we informed appellant the docketing statement in this case was due. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the docketing statement within ten days might result in the dismissal of this appeal without further
notice. By letter dated May 16, 2019, w e informed appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or to provide written documentation appellant had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs within ten days

. We– 2

–

cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further
notice. To date, appellant ha s not paid the filing fee, provided the required documentation, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regard ing the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b) , (c).

190374F.P05 /Cory L. Carlyle/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE– 3

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT
JOHN CHARLES SEGOVIA, Appellant
No. 05

- 19

- 00374

- CV V. PAMELA DIBBLES, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 18

- 06003

- E. Opinion delivered by Justice Carlyle. Justices Myers and Molberg participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee PAMELA DIBBLES recover her costs of this appeal from appellant JOHN CHARLES SEGOVIA.

Judgment entered this 27 th day of June, 2019.
# C_2013038EN.01001902.xml

| 9.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2012 — Commission v Strack

(Joined Cases T-197/11 P and T-198/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Access to documents - Articles 26 and 26a of the Staff Regulations - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Jurisdiction of the Civil Service Tribunal - Inadmissibility of the action at first instance - No act adversely affecting an official - Article 90(a) of the Rules of Procedure)

2013/C 38/32

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: P. Costa de Oliveira and B. Eggers, Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Guido Strack (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Two appeals brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2011 in Case F-121/07 Strack v Commission (2011) ECR-SC I-A-1-0000 and II-A-1-0000 and seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Strack

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Joins Cases T-197/11 P and T-198/11 P for the purposes of the present judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Joins Cases T-197/11 P and T-198/11 P for the purposes of the present judgment;

| 2. | Sets aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2011 in Case F-121/07 Strack v Commission (2011) ECR I-A-1-0000 and II-A-1-0000 in so far as that Tribunal considered itself to have jurisdiction to hear and determine an action for annulment against a decision adopted under Regulation No 1049/2001; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Sets aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2011 in Case F-121/07 Strack v Commission (2011) ECR I-A-1-0000 and II-A-1-0000 in so far as that Tribunal considered itself to have jurisdiction to hear and determine an action for annulment against a decision adopted under Regulation No 1049/2001;

| 3. | Dismisses the appeal in Case T-198/11 P; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the appeal in Case T-198/11 P;

| 4. | Orders Mr Guido Strack to bear his own costs in Cases T-197/11 P and T-198/11 P and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in Case T-198/11 P; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Mr Guido Strack to bear his own costs in Cases T-197/11 P and T-198/11 P and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in Case T-198/11 P;

| 5. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs in Case T-197/11 P; |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs in Case T-197/11 P;

| 6. | Orders Mr Strack to pay the Civil Service Tribunal EUR 2 000 in order to reimburse part of the costs which that latter had to incur. |
| --- | --- |

6.

Orders Mr Strack to pay the Civil Service Tribunal EUR 2 000 in order to reimburse part of the costs which that latter had to incur.

---

(1)  OJ C 186, 25.6.2011.

1

---
Proclamation 8120 of April 5, 2007

# Pan American Day and Pan American Week, 2007

Each year on Pan American Day and during Pan American Week, we underscore our commitment to supporting the citizens in the Pan American community, strengthening democracy in the Western Hemisphere, and advancing the cause of peace worldwide.

In 1890, the International Union of American Republics was established to promote cooperation among the Americas. Today, the United States and our neighbors in the Western Hemisphere are a community linked by common values, shared interests, and the close bonds of family and friendship. As the expansion of freedom continues in our region, the democratic nations of the Western Hemisphere are working together to build a safer and more prosperous society and to ensure that all the people of the Americas have the opportunity to achieve their dreams.

My Administration is working to advance the cause of social justice in the Pan American region, and we are committed to supporting our neighbors' efforts to meet the needs of their citizens. In 2004, we created the Millennium Challenge Corporation to provide increased aid to nations that govern justly, invest in the education and health of their people, and promote economic freedom. We are working with the citizens of the Pan American community to expand economic opportunity through debt relief and to encourage reforms through such mechanisms as the North America Free Trade Agreement, the Chile Free Trade Agreement, and the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement. These agreements facilitate the flow of trade and help establish market economies. We have also recently notified the Congress of our intention to enter into a free trade agreement with Panama and signed free trade agreements with Peru and Colombia. These agreements will generate export opportunities for the United States and benefit the people of Panama, Peru, and Colombia by providing economic opportunity and helping to strengthen democratic institutions. By working with our democratic neighbors to build strong and vibrant economies, we are helping the citizens of the Western Hemisphere realize the promise of a free and just society.

The ties between the democratic nations of the Western Hemisphere are deep and lasting, and together we can continue our great strides toward freedom and prosperity for people everywhere.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim April 14, 2007, as Pan American Day and April 8 through April 14, 2007, as Pan American Week. I urge the Governors of the 50 States, the Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the officials of other areas under the flag of the United States of America to honor these observances with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fifth day of April, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first.



[FR Doc. 07-1775 Billing code 3195-01-P
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending November 12, 2005

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
# C_2013313EN.01002302.xml

| 26.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2013 — Makhlouf v Council

(Case T-383/11) (1)

1

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Syria - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Restrictions on entry into, or transit through, the territory of the European Union - Rights of defence - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Fundamental rights)

2013/C 313/44

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Eyad Makhlouf (Damascus, Syria) (represented: initially by P. Grollet and G. Karouni, and subsequently by G. Karouni and C. Rygaert, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: G. Étienne and R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and S. Pardo Quintillán, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Implementing Decision 2011/302/CFSP of 23 May 2011 implementing Decision 2011/273/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2011 L 136, p. 91), of Council Decision 2011/782/CFSP of 1 December 2011 concerning restrictive measures against Syria and repealing Decision 2011/273/CFSP (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 56), and of Council Decision 2012/739/CFSP of 29 November 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Syria and repealing Decision 2011/782/CFSP (OJ 2012 L 330, p. 21), in so far as those acts concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Eyad Makhlouf to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Eyad Makhlouf to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7986

ELIZABETH MARIE RUSHING FLOYD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DAVID A. BROWN, an individual; ROBERT POTTER, an individual; RICHARD VOORHEES, an individual; THOMAS WIDMAN, an individual, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. H. Brent McKnight, District Judge. (CA-03-554-MCK) Submitted: February 24, 2005 Decided: March 9, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elizabeth Marie Rushing Floyd, Appellant Pro Se. James Michael Sullivan, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Elizabeth Marie Rushing Floyd appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to vacate the court’s September 24, 2004, order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Floyd v. Brown , No. CA-03-554-MCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 22, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Central Federal Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 13, 2007
    /s/ Therese Ann LiutkusTherese Ann Liutkus, CPATreasurer and Chief Financial Officer 31.
# C_2008245EN.01002801.xml

| 26.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/28

---

Corrigendum to Commission notice pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 — Modification by Italy of the public service obligation in respect of the scheduled air service between Pantelleria-Trapani

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 230 of 9 September 2008
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 230 of 9 September 2008

(2008/C 245/08)

On page 17, the text of the notice should read as follows:

‘In accordance with Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes, the Italian Government has decided to modify the public service obligation in respect of the scheduled air services between Pantelleria and Trapani, published in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 112 of 12 May 2006 and amended in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 141 of 26 June 2007 and
  Official Journal of the European Union C 121 of 17 May 2008.

In accordance with point 2.4(c) of the public service obligation, the fares are revised as follows:

| Route | Revised fare
  (excluding VAT) |
| --- | --- |
| Pantelleria-Trapani or vice versa | EUR 26,53 |

Route

Revised fare

(excluding VAT)

Pantelleria-Trapani or vice versa

EUR 26,53

The other requirements of the public service obligation published in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 112 of 12 May 2006 remain unchanged.’

---
§ 182.730 Nonferrous metallic piping materials. ( a ) Nonferrous metallic piping materials are acceptable for use in the following: ( 1 ) Non-vital systems;
( 2 ) Aluminum fuel piping, if of a minimum of Schedule 80 wall thickness on an aluminum hulled vessel;
( 3 ) Aluminum bilge, ballast, and firemain piping on an aluminum hulled vessel;
( 4 ) If acceptable to the cognizant OCMI, nonferrous metallic piping with a melting temperature above 927 °C (1,700 °F) may be used in vital systems that are deemed to be galvanically compatible; and
( 5 ) Other uses specifically accepted by the cognizant OCMI.
( b ) Where nonferrous metallic material is permitted for use in piping systems by this subpart, the restrictions in this paragraph apply: ( 1 ) Provisions must be made to protect piping systems using aluminum alloys in high risk fire areas due to the low melting point of aluminum alloys;
( 2 ) Provisions must be made to prevent or mitigate the effect of galvanic corrosion due to the relative solution potentials of copper, aluminum, and alloys of copper and aluminum, which are used in conjunction with each other, steel, or other metals and their alloys;
( 3 ) A suitable thread compound must be used in making up threaded joints in aluminum pipe to prevent seizing. Pipe in the annealed temper must not be threaded;
( 4 ) The use of aluminum alloys with a copper content exceeding 0.6 percent is prohibited; and
( 5 ) The use of cast aluminum alloys in hydraulic fluid power systems must be in accordance with the requirements of § 58.30-15(f) in subchapter F of this chapter.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN, NORTHERN DIVISION

R.L. Ross

Plaintiff,

v.

Donald Bachand, et.al.,

Defendant.

No. 1:14-cv-14122

Judge Thomas L. Ludington

NOTICE OF APPEAL

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Notice is hereby given that Pro Se Plaintiff, R.L. Ross, in the above 

named case, hereby appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the 

Sixth Circuit from the Order Granting Defendants Motion to Dismiss (ECF 

#51) entered in this action on April 20, 2015. 

Pro Se Plaintiff

R.L. Ross

Date: April 27, 2015 /s R.L. Ross

29106 Glencastle Drive

Farmington Hills, MI 48336

(248) 721-9760

1:14-cv-14122-TLL-PTM Doc # 54 Filed 04/27/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1962
1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that I electronically filed the NOTICE OF APPEAL with the 

Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which will automatically notify 

the attorneys of the Defendants.

Pro Se Plaintiff

R.L. Ross

Date: April 27, 2015 /s R.L. Ross

29106 Glencastle Drive

Farmington Hills, MI 48336

(248) 721-9760

1:14-cv-14122-TLL-PTM Doc # 54 Filed 04/27/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1963
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway,

 Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 28, 2009 

d0921 

Order 

 

September 28, 2009 

139071 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139071 

 COA: 291252 

Genesee CC: 08-022431-FH; 

DONALD DEE SCOTT, JR., 07-021547-FH 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 5, 2009 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 188.10-25 Explosive.

This term means a chemical compound or mixture, the primary purpose of which is to function by explosion; *i.e.*, with substantially instantaneous release of gas and heat. Explosives are discussed in more detail in 49 CFR parts 171-179.

[CGFR 67-83, 33 FR 1113, Jan. 27, 1968, as amended by CGD 86-033, 53 FR 36026, Sept. 16, 1988]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

    Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of ComBanc, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Paul G. Wreede, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

                  (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                        section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                        1934, as amended; and

                  (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                        in all material respects, the financial condition and
                        results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Paul G. Wreede
-------------------
Paul G. Wreede, President and Chief Executive Officer

August 13, 2004

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.