alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 173.054 Watertight subdivision and damage stability standards for new sailing school vessels. ( a ) Each new sailing school vessel which has a mean length greater than 75 feet (22.8 meters) *or* which carries more than 30 persons must comply with— ( 1 ) Section 179.210(a) of this chapter;
( 2 ) Sections 171.070 through 171.073; and
( 3 ) Section 171.080 for Type II subdivision and damage stability.
( b ) Each new sailing school vessel which has a mean length of 75 feet (22.8 meters) or less and carries more than 30 persons must comply with either— ( 1 ) Section 179.210(a) of this chapter and § 179.220 of this chapter; or
( 2 ) Section 171.040(a)(1), §§ 171.070 through 171.073, and § 171.080.
( c ) Each new sailing school vessel which does not carry more than 30 persons must have a collision bulkhead unless it has a mean length less than 40 feet (12.2 meters) and is certificated for protected or partially protected waters service only.
[CGD 83-005, 51 FR 924, Jan. 9, 1986, as amended by CGD 85-080, 61 FR 946, Jan. 10, 1996]
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2012 - 0146 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM115AD

605 - 35 - 001 --- 1/31/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
§ 177.1030 Operating station visibility. ( a ) Windows and other openings at the operating station must be of sufficient size and properly located to provide an adequate view for safe navigation in all operating conditions.
( b ) Glass or other glazing material used in windows at the operating station must have a light transmission of not less than 70 percent according to Test 2 of ANSI Z 26.1 (incorporated by reference, see 46 CFR 175.600) and must comply with Test 15 of ANSI Z 26.1 for Class I Optical Deviation.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 961, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65206, Oct. 31, 2008]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending January 14, 2006

|Filer                     | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                                 
|------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|FIFTH THIRD BANK          | * Branch       | Application by Fifth Third Bank, Grand Rapids, Michigan to establish a bank branch at 4801 Norton Healthcare Boulevard, Louisville, Kentucky | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                | Not available 
|Federal Register:         | Not applicable
|FIFTH THIRD BANK          | * Branch       | Application by Fifth Third Bank, Grand Rapids, Michigan to establish a bank branch at 11511 State Road 82, Ft. Meyers, Florida               | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                | Not available 
|Federal Register:         | Not applicable
|NATIONAL CITY CORPORATION | * 3A5          | National City Corporation, Cleveland, Ohio to acquire Forbes First Financial Corporation,St. Louis, Missouri                                 | Newspaper:01/30/2006Federal Register:01/30/2006       
|Newspaper:                | 01/30/2006    
|Federal Register:         | 01/30/2006    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|TWIN VALLEY BK, WEST ALEXANDRIA, OHIO | 381026 | 10/24/2005 | 12/22/2005     | S         | Small Bank 
|WESBANCO BK, WHEELING, WEST VIRGINIA  | 645625 | 08/01/2005 | 01/04/2006     | O         | Large Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit 32.1   Certification  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Optimized Transportation Management, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  DATE: November 12, 2009  BY: /s/ Kevin P. Brennan Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  This certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for any other purpose. It is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Optimized Transportation Management, Inc. and will be retained by Optimized Transportation Management, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 6, 2018

No. 04-18-00815-CV

IN RE Monica Martinez RAMIREZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice 

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

On November 21, 2018, this court denied relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. On 

December 4, 2018, relator filed a motion requesting en banc reconsideration. After considering 

the motion, relator’s motion is hereby DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on December 6, 2018.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of December, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2004EM5-00428, styled In the Interest of M.J.A., A Child, pending in the 

407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Richard Price presiding.
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Garth Johnson, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Trans-Orient
    Petroleum Ltd for the fiscal period ending July 31, 2002.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
    necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
    under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
    the period covered by this annual report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
    financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in
    all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
    and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
    in this annual report;

4.  The Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
    for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
    defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and
    have:

    (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
         that material information relating to the registrant, including
         its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
         within those entities, particularly during the period in which
         this annual report is being prepared;

    (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure
         controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
         the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date");

         and

    (c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based
         on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
    based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and
    the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons
    performing the equivalent function):

    (a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
         internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's
         ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
         and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material
         weaknesses in internal controls; and

    (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
         management or other employees who have a significant role in
         the Registrant's internal controls; and

6.  The Registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:              January 29, 2003


"Garth Johnson"
-----------------
Garth Johnson,
Interim President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-41400 Conference Calendar

LARRY EDWARD HUDDLESTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus GAIL FALCO, Assistant District Attorney for Collin County; CHARLES PALMER, Assistant Attorney General for the State of Texas; GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:99-CV-174

-------------------- June 16, 2000 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Larry Edward Huddleston, prisoner number 04147-010, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous. The district court determined that the suit lacked any arguable basis in law, as the defendants were entitled to immunity. Huddleston has failed to brief this issue. See YoheyNo. 99-41400 -2- v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993); Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(9). This appeal should thus be dismissed as frivolous. Because the appeal is dismissed for failure to brief, Huddleston’s motion to expand the record is denied. This dismissal of a frivolous appeal following the district court’s dismissal of the lawsuit as frivolous constitutes two strikes against Huddleston for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). If one other district court action or appeal filed by Huddleston is dismissed as frivolous, he will be barred from bringing a civil action or appeal as a prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. 5TH C IR . R. 42.2. MOTION TO EXPAND THE RECORD DENIED. SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
5:14-cr-20804-JCO-DRG Doc # 5 Filed 09/24/14 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 14
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          61,455                 106,910
<SECURITIES>                                    26,299                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,774                   1,249
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (738)                    (58)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                98,126                 111,189
<PP&E>                                          22,461                   7,216
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,630                   1,323
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 804,669                 416,725
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,573                  11,618
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           850                     715
<OTHER-SE>                                     781,743                 402,873
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   804,669                 416,725
<SALES>                                        105,303                  27,873
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               105,303                  27,873
<CGS>                                           78,158                  13,863
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  230,098                  42,195
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   272                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4,163)                    (54)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (120,904)                (14,268)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       464                   2,951
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (121,368)                (17,219)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (121,368)                (17,219)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.59)                  (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.59)                  (0.38)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Garry Prime, the principal executive officer, certifythat:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Evercel,Inc. (the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrantand have:

a)   designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

b)   evaluatedthe effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions above the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)   disclosedin this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theRegistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee ofRegistrant's board of directors:

a)   allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)   anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financialreporting; 

Date: August 14, 2003

/s/ Garry Prime                      Garry PrimeChief Executive Officer
# STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

In the matter of 

### State ofConnecticut Department ofPublic Works TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDERNO. 8130 MODIFICATION

TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDER MODIFICATION 

### In the matterofa Trading Agreement and Orderbetween the CommissionerofEnvironmental Protection ("Commissioner") and the Commissioner ofthe Department ofPublic Works ("DPW"). WHEREAS, the Commissioner and DPW, having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading Agreement and Order No. 8130 issued on October 18, 1996, do now, 

### by mutual 

### agreement, modify paragraphs C.l., C.l.C., C.l.F., CA. 

### and C.Il. as follows: 1. Change the second date specified in paragraph C.l. from May I, 1999 to May 1,2003. 2. Change the date specified in paragraph C.I.C. from May I, 1999 to May 1,2003. 

### J. Replace paragraph C.l.F. as follows: No later than March 1 ofthe years 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 include with its alU1ual emissions report to the Conunissioner, NOx emissions and ERCs used for the previous (:alendar year, in monthly increments; 4. Change the date specified in paragraph CA. from May 1, 1999 to May 1,2003. 5. Change the date specified in paragraph C.II. from May 1, 1999 to May 1,2003.
-.AII other terms and conditions ofTrading Agreement and OrderNo. 8130 issued by the

Commissioner acting under Sections 22a-6, 22a-171, 22a-174, 22a-176, 22a-l77 and 22a-l78 of the COlU1ecticut General Statutes shall remain in effect.

# [nitials:~ ?9 Elm ( Printed on Recycled Paper) Sireer • Jiillrord. CT 06106· 512? hllp:/lde**p,srile_el.~J** "" Eq",al Opport",,,ily Employu

### •

The State ofColU1ecticut Department ofPublic 

### Works 

### 2 TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDERNO. 8130 MODIFICATION



### ecticut Department ofPublic Works

TR AnSOD c\mmiSSiQDO'\r 

### The tate Signature: Type Name: The State ofConnecticut Department ofPublic Works ereby consents to the entry ofthis 

### modification to the TradingAgreement and Orderwitlxlutflurther notice.

Type Title:
Date: nnecticut



### 1999. 

### Entered as amodification ofan Order ofthe Commissioner ofEnvironmental Protection numbered 8130 this 

## _----=:;2.-:..:::.!.1

__ day of

Arthur 

### J. Rocque, Jr. 

### Commissioner TOWN OF NEWTOWN LAND RECORDS MAILED CERTIFIED MAIL,

_ RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Certified Document No.
#### Roundtree, et al. v. Meadors, et al.

(Decided January 24, 1919.)

Appeal from Whitley Circuit Court.

Appeal and Error — Omissions in Record — Effect.—Where portions of the evidence, bearing upon the-questions involved, are omitted from the record on appeal, the judgment will be affirmed.

STEPHENS & STEELY for appellants.

ROSE & POPE for appellees.

Opinion op the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

In February, 1914, Mary Roundtree and her husband, Eugene Roundtree, purchased from Alec Cornelius a farm located in Whitley county. The purchase price was $3,500.00, of which, the sum of $2,245.65 was paid in cash, and the balance was represented by two notes, one for $627.35, payable February 4, 1915, and the other for $627.00, payable February 4, 1916, secured by "a lien on the property. On July 11,1914, Mary Roundtree and her *48husband conveyed this farm to Hampton Mea,dors in consideration of the conveyance to them of a farm owned by Meadors, and Ms agreement to discharge the lien notes on the Cornelius farm;

This action was brought by the Roundtrees against Hampton Meadors and wife, and Maynard Meadors, a brother of Hampton Meadors, to set aside the transaction on the ground that Eugene Roundtree was an infant when the conveyance was made, and that the conveyance was obtained from plaintiffs by covin, misrepresentation and fraud. On final hearing, the chancellor held that plaintiffs were not entitled to the relief prayed for, and rendered judgment dismissing the petition. Plaintiffs appeal.

It appears from the clerk’s certificate that four depositions, which were read and considered on the hearing below, are omitted from the record. Where portions of the evidence, bearing upon the questions involved,' are omitted from the record on appeal, the judgment will be affirmed. First State Bank of Irvington, v. Richardson, 167 Ky. 771, 181 S. W. 611; Bryant v. Stephens, 175 Ky. 367, 194 S. W. 327.

Judgment affirmed.