alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012303EN.01000701.xml

| 6.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/7

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 July 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gyulai Törvényszék — Hungary) — HERMES Hitel és Faktor Zrt v Nemzeti Földalapkezelő Szervezet

(Case C-16/12) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - General principles of European Union law - Forestry Act - Lack of connection to European Union law - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

2012/C 303/13

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Gyulai Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: HERMES Hitel és Faktor Zrt

Applicant:

Defendant: Nemzeti Földalapkezelő Szervezet

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Gyulai Törvényszék — Interpretation of the general principles of European Union law — Mortgage loan contract concluded between a financial establishment and a public body — Legislative amendment declaring non-transferable certain forested areas which were previously traded — Amendment preventing public auction of the property mortgaged following legal proceedings brought by a creditor for non-performance of the contract by the debtor

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Gyulai Törvényszék (Hungary), by decision of 4 January 2012

---

(1)  OJ C 126, 28.4.2012.

1

---
New Jersey Department of Labor, Workmen’s Compensation Bureau.

#### JACOB THOMAS, PETITIONER, v. HUGH SIMANTON, RESPONDENT.

Testimony in this case shows that the petitioner was a night watchman in the garage of respondent * * *. While pushing a wheelbarrow loaded with ashes up an incline in the rear of the respondent’s garage he slipped, and while falling struck the lower righ-hand side of his stomach on the wheelbarrow. He was immediately stricken with a severe sharp pain, and as soon as possible he proceeded as best he could to the office telephone, a distance of about one hundred and ten feet, for the purpose of calling a doctor. As he was about to telephone, Dr. Young drove his car into respondent’s garage and petitioner explained the situation to him. Dr. Young immediately drove him to his office, and having examined him, diagnosed the ease as hernia.

Dr. Young’s sworn statement admitted in evidence states, among other things, *“he*was tender over the hernia, but it was easily reduced,” which conclusively proves there must have been a previous descent of said hernia. Dr. Young then took the petitioner to his home where petitioner.notified his employer of the accident. In accordance with Dr. Young’s recommendation the petitioner entered Easton Hospital and was operated on for hernia ■ * * *.

In view of the facts which developed at the trial of this claim, I' am of the opinion that this case is to be classified from paragraph 11 (X) of the Compensation laws. The defense of the respondent in this matter seems to rest wholly on the contention that there was no prostration experienced *441by the petitioner immediately following this alleged accident. In taking this stand the respondent errs in that he is failing to use the word “prostration” in the manner described by the statute. By referring to said paragraph 11 (X) of the Compensation law, it will be noted that the term “prostration” is not used without some modification. It states very definitely that the prostration must be to the extent that the employe is compelled to cease work immediately.

In the case at bar the testimony shows that the petitioner ceased work immediately after the occurrence of the accident because of the severe pain which he had, and while still in distress, suffering intensely, he proceeded to call a doctor. It is evident from the testimony that the petitioner ceased work because of his pain and prostration and immediate need of medical aid.

The full five elements of paragraph 11 (X) of the Compensation law have been met, namely:

1. The descent of hernia shall immediately follow the cause;

*2.*There must be severe pain in the hernial region;

3. There must be such prostration as to compel the employe to cease work immediately;

4. That these facts must be conveyed to the employer within twenty-four hours;

5. The physical distress must be such as to require the attendance of a physician within twenty-four hours.

The petitioner is entitled to an award.

* * * *%*v * ifc ❖ ❖

W. E. Stubbs, *Deputy Commissioner.*
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A0 93 8 . YOUNG v

. THE STATE.

Th e ab o v e-s t y l ed ap p eal was d ock et ed i n t h i s Co u rt o n F e b r u ary 5

, 2 0 1 6.

Pu rs u an t t o Ru l e 2 3 (a) o f t h e Co u rt of Ap p eal s , Ap p el l an t W i l li e Y o u n g was

req u i red t o fi l e a b ri ef an d en um erat i o n o f erro rs i n t h is Co u rt b y Feb ru ary 2 5

, 2 0 1 6.

As of t h e d at e o f th is o rd er, Yo u n g h as n o t fi l ed a bri ef o r en u m erat i o n o f erro rs , an d

h as n ot fi l ed a m o ti o n fo r ex t en s i o n fo r g o o d cau s e.

Th erefo re, t h i s ap peal i s DISM ISSED. See Co u rt o f A p p eal s Ru les 7, 1 3 an d

2 3 (a).

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 03/14/2016 March 14, 2016
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas H. Aasen, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.



|                       |  |  |  |                                                                                           
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ THOMAS H. AASEN                                                                       
|                       |  |  |  | Thomas H. AasenExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand Chief Business Officer

This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or
the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to
the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Rick Berry, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ RICK BERRYRick
      BerryChief
      Financial Officer





August
10, 2009





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sanders Morris Harris
Group Inc. and will be retained by Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-1773 Filed 4-5-05; 2:28 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
_______________________________________ __ ___________________ __________________

___________________ __________________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 5, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

Chief Justice
129152(64) Michael F. Cavanagh 129154(89) Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices SC 129152 v CoA 247718 Wayne CC 02-05202 CEDRIC PIPES, Defendant-Appellee.

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, SC 129154 v CoA 247719 Wayne CC 02-05202 JULIAN DALE KEY, Defendant-Appellee.

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by plaintiff-appellant for
extension to December 21, 2005 of the time for filing their brief and appendix is
considered, and it is GRANTED.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 5, 2006

Clerk
Exhibit 4.1


 





 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

18925 Base Camp Road

Monument, Colorado 80132


June 26, 2020


 


Advisors Disciplined Trust 2022


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


BNY Atlantic Terminal


2 Hanson Place, 12th Floor


Brooklyn, New York 11217


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 2022 (the
“Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined
the Registration Statement File No. 333-237230 for the above captioned Fund. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement
of the references to Advisors Asset Management, Inc. as evaluator.


You are hereby
authorized to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	/s/ ALEX R. MEITZNER
	 		Alex R. Meitzner
	 		Senior Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PLANET HOLLYWOOD FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 29, 1996,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                          49,831
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,697
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     20,604
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,873
<PP&E>                                         273,960
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,852
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 401,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,322
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,075
<OTHER-SE>                                     311,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   401,260
<SALES>                                        347,436
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               373,364
<CGS>                                           93,426
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  293,737
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,037
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,874
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 75,716
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,636
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 10,421
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,659
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

A.T., a Child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-1454

[April 11, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; John J. Parnofiello, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2023-CJ000139-XXXX-MB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine Austin, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

 SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

 Case No. 15-mj-30085 

v. 

AL-HAMZAH MOHAMMAD JAWAD, 

Defendant. 

__________________________________/ 

 

STIPULATED ORDER FOR TEMPORARY RELEASE 

OF DEFENDANT BY USMS TO CUSTODY OF FBI AND ERO 

The parties in this matter anticipate that this case will be resolved by a 

pretrial diversion agreement which will include the defendant’s consensual 

removal to Iraq. In order to obtain the necessary travel documents, the defendant 

is required to appear in person at the Iraqi consulate. Accordingly, the parties 

agree and request that the Court order the release of the defendant from the custody 

of the United States Marshals Service (USMS) to the custody of the Federal 

Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO), 

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, on Friday, February 19, 2016, from 

9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. for purposes of the defendant’s appearance at the Iraqi 

consulate. The FBI and ERO will return the defendant to the USMS at or before 

2:15-mj-30085-DUTY Doc # 15 Filed 02/17/16 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 29
2 

5:00 p.m. on February 19, 2016, after the conclusion of the application process at 

the Iraqi consulate. 

Respectfully submitted, 

BARBARA L. MCQUADE 

United States Attorney 

s/Cathleen M. Corken s/Todd Shanker with consent 

CATHLEEN M. CORKEN TODD SHANKER 

Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Al-Hamzah Mohammad Jawad 

211 W. Fort Street Federal Defender Office 

Suite 2001 613 Abbott, 5th Floor 

Detroit, MI 48226 Detroit, MI 48226 

Date: February 12, 2016

2:15-mj-30085-DUTY Doc # 15 Filed 02/17/16 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 30
ORDER 

 After reading the above stipulation, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States Marshals Service 

(USMS) will release custody of the defendant to the custody of the Federal Bureau 

of Investigation (FBI) and Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO), U.S. 

Immigration and Customs Enforcement, on Friday, February 19, 2016, from 9:00 

a.m. to 5:00 p.m. for purposes of the defendant’s appearance at the Iraqi consulate. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the FBI and ERO will return the defendant to 

the custody of the U.S. Marshals Service at or before 5:00 p.m. on February 19, 

2016. 

 

 

 s/ Mona K. Majzoub 

Mona K. Majzoub 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Entered: February 17, 2016 

2:15-mj-30085-DUTY Doc # 15 Filed 02/17/16 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 31
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
            OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C SECTION 1350)

      The undersigned, as the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
of Matria Healthcare, Inc., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and
belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005,
which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Matria Healthcare, Inc. at the
dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.

      This 15th day of March 2006.

                                    /s/ Parker H. Petit
                                   --------------------------------
                                    Parker H. Petit
                                    Chairman of the Board and
                                    Chief Executive Officer

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Matria
Healthcare, Inc. and will be retained by Matria Healthcare, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

      The information in this Exhibit 32.1 shall not be deemed "filed" for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor
shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in
such filing.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

DONNA FOSTER, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-11368 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

COMMISSIONER OF 

SOCIAL SECURITY, 

 Defendant. 

_________________________________/ 

ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT (ECF #18) AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF #14) 

In this action, Plaintiff Donna Foster (“Plaintiff”) challenges the denial of 

her applications for disability benefits. (See Compl., ECF #1.) Plaintiff and the 

Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) have now filed cross-motions for 

summary judgment. (See ECF ## 14, 18.) 

On July 15, 2016, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued a Report and 

Recommendation recommending that the Court grant Defendant’s motion and 

deny Plaintiff’s motion (the “R&R”). (See ECF #23.) At the conclusion of the 

R&R, the Magistrate Judge informed the parties that if they wanted to seek review 

of his recommendation, they needed to file specific objections with the Court 

within fourteen days. (See id. at 20-21, Pg. ID 1371-72.) 

2:15-cv-11368-MFL-RSW Doc # 24 Filed 08/10/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1373
2 

Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the R&R. The failure to file 

objections to an R&R waives any further right to appeal. See Howard v. Sec'y of 

Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of 

Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to 

object to an R&R releases the Court from its duty to independently review the 

matter. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). 

Accordingly, because Plaintiff has failed to file any objections to the R&R, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation to grant 

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is ADOPTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that (1) Defendant's Motion for Summary 

Judgment (ECF #18) is GRANTED and (2) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary 

Judgment (ECF #14) is DENIED. 

       s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: August 10, 2016 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on August 10, 2016, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113 

2:15-cv-11368-MFL-RSW Doc # 24 Filed 08/10/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1374