alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0001007020
<NAME> INTEGRATED SYSTEMS CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           2,479
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,272
<ALLOWANCES>                                       200
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,067
<PP&E>                                           2,133
<DEPRECIATION>                                     721
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,586
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,740
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            35
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,811
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,586
<SALES>                                         21,024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,024
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,746
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 113
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,245
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,395
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,850
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,850
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30


</TABLE>
#### McMurry, Committee v. Mimms, et al.

(Decided February 25, 1919.)

Appeal from Todd Circuit Court.

Appeal and Error — Agreed Judgment. — A party, who makes no defense to an action, and by his answer, makes no issue, and agrees, that the judgment may be rendered, will not be heard upon appeal from it.

W. B. REEVES for appellant.

JAS. R. MALLORY for appellees.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Hurt

Dismissing appeal.

*409This is an appeal from a judgment rendered against a person, of unsound mind, and her committee. The committee appeared and filed answer for himself and his ward, in the circuit court, and appears for the ward upon this appeal. No issue was made in the circuit court. The allegations, of the petition, were not denied l.y the answer, hut, the averments of the petition, were, affirmatively alleged to he true, hy the answer, and the relief sought in the petition, was agreed to, hy the answer. No relief was sought in the answer of any kind, hut, it was expressly averred, that the defendants, appellants, here, had no cause of complaint. The committee, having agreed to the judgment appealed from, can not, now, he heard upon an appeal from the judgment. An action, in which no issues are made, and all the parties agree, and the judgment rendered is in accordance with the agreed facts, does not present anything for the determination of a court of review. The committee does not seem, however, to occupy a disinterested position, between his own interests and those of his ward, and a guardian *ad litem*was not appointed to represent her. The appeal, is therefore dismissed, hut without prejudice to any right of the ward, if any, she has.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 65 (Thursday, April 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16799-16800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1695]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the Public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Initial Review 
Group; Subcommittee A--Cancer Centers.
    Date: April 24, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Gail J. Bryant, MD., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Resources and Training Review Branch, Division of 
Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive 
Blvd., Room 8107, MSC 8328, Bethesda, MD 20892-8328, (301) 402-0801, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d8bfbaebe8ac98b6b1b0f6bfb7ae"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="06616435367246686f6e28616970">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 16800]]


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 27, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Officer of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1695 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending May 6, 2006

----

Regulations And PoliciesHome Equity Lending  -- to hold four public hearings under the authority of the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act of 1994 and request for public comment (Docket No. OP-1253).					-Approved, May 1, 2006 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: May 11, 2006
#### § 167.65-60 Examination of boilers and machinery by engineer.

It shall be the duty of an engineer when he assumes charge of the boilers and machinery of a nautical school ship to examine the same forthwith and thoroughly, and if he finds any part thereof in bad condition, he shall immediately report the facts to the master, owner, or agent, and to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, of the district, who shall thereupon investigate the matter and take such actions as may be necessary.
Argued and submitted October 30, 1995,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration January 3, 1996

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of James W. Jones, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Willamina Lumber Company, *Petitioners, v.*James W. JONES, *Respondent.*

(WCB 93-06575; CA A86428)

908 P2d 853

Julene Quinn argued the cause for petitioners. On the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and David L. Runner, Assistant Attorney General.

James L. Edmunson filed the brief for respondent.

*484-aBefore Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*485PER CURIAM

SAIF seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that claimant’s preexisting facio-scapulohumeral muscular dystrophy has been made worse by his employment and is therefore compensable.

 The Board found that claimant’s employment is the major contributing cause of the worsening of his preexisting condition. That finding is supported by substantial evidence. As amended by the legislature in 1995, ORS 656.802(2) provides:

> “If the occupational disease claim is based on the worsening of a preexisting disease or condition pursuant to ORS 656.005(7), the worker must prove that employment conditions were the major contributing cause of the *combined condition and pathological worsening of the disease.”*(Emphasis supplied.)

The amendment is applicable to all cases pending on review. *Volk v. America West Airlines,*135 Or App 565, 899 P2d 746 (1995). The Board’s opinion does not make a determination as to whether employment conditions were the major contributing cause of claimant’s combined condition. Accordingly, the case is remanded for reconsideration.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.007-6 Test report. ( a ) The test report required shall contain at least the following: ( 1 ) Name of manufacturer.
( 2 ) Purpose of test.
( 3 ) Test conditions and date of test.
( 4 ) Description of the panel tested giving the details of the assembly comprising a steel plate, insulation (thickness and density) spacer strips and fastening and the method of mounting the panel assembly in the test furnace.
( 5 ) Complete time-temperature data, including initial temperature, for each thermocouple together with curves of average temperature for the unexposed surface of the insulation and the thermocouple recording the highest temperature. In addition, for § 164.007-9(g)(2), complete time-temperature data consisting of a numerical time-temperature table for each furnace and each surface of insulation thermocouple together with the initial temperature of each thermocouple.
( 6 ) A log maintained by the owner relative to deflections, cracking or loosening of the insulation, smoke or gas emission, glow, flame emission, and any other important data. The time of each observation should be noted.
( 7 ) Photographs of both sides of the panel before and after testing.
( 8 ) Summary of test results.
( b ) [Reserved]
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with thequarterly report of TorreyPines Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), I, Craig Johnson, Vice President, Finance, ChiefFinancial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to my knowledge:

1.             theReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.             theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        |   | /s/ Craig  Johnson                                               |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Craig Johnson                                                    |
|   |   | Vice President,  Finance, Chief Financial Officer  and Secretary |
|   |   | (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer)                    |

 

August 13, 2007

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

“This certificationaccompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before orafter the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporationlanguage contained in such filing.”

----
Exhibit 32.2
------------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zomex Distribution, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter
Buckley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Peter Buckley
-------------------------------
Peter Buckley
Chief Financial Officer

May 20, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the 15th meeting of the American Health Information Community Population Health and Clinical Care Connections Workgroup [formerly Biosurveillance Workgroup] in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.).

# DATES:

May 16, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. [Eastern].

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building, (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090 (please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​population/​*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Workgroup will continue its discussion on how to facilitate the flow of reliable health information among population health and clinical care systems necessary to protect and improve the public's health.

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional information, go to:                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​population/​pop_​instruct.htm*.                

Dated: April 16, 2007.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 07-2006 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2098 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the look-through 

treatment of payments between related controlled foreign corporations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2009 

Mr. TANNER (for himself, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, and Mr. BOUSTANY) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the look-through treatment of payments between related 

controlled foreign corporations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF LOOK-THROUGH TREATMENT 

4 OF PAYMENTS BETWEEN RELATED CON5 TROLLED FOREIGN CORPORATIONS. 

6 Subparagraph (C) of section 954(c)(6) of the Inter7 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘Janu8 ary 1, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2015’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
§ 184.100 General requirement. ( a ) Vessel control systems and other miscellaneous systems and equipment required by this part must be suitable for the purposes intended.
( b ) The cognizant Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI) may require navigation, control, or communications equipment, in excess of the equipment specifically required by this part, on a vessel that is of a novel design, operates at high speeds in restricted or high traffic areas, operates in a dynamically supported mode, or operates on extended routes or in remote locations.
July 20, 2017

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

FREDDY GARCIA, Appellant

NO. 14-16-00242-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The 

record reveals error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment REVERSED 

and REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# C_2011252EN.01003901.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/39

---

Action brought on 30 June 2011 — Getty Images v OHIM (PHOTOS.COM)

(Case T-338/11)

2011/C 252/87

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Getty Images (US), Inc. (Seattle, United States) (represented by: P.G. Olson, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 April 2011 in case R 1831/2010-2; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 April 2011 in case R 1831/2010-2; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘PHOTOS.COM’ for goods and services in classes 9, 42 and 45 — Community trade mark application No 8549991

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Partially refused the application for a Community trade mark

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) in conjunction with Article 7(3) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal: (i) wrongly found that the mark applied for describes the goods/services for which registration was sought; (ii) erred by disregarding the fact that the applicant’s domain name registration corresponds to the mark applied for and has an effect on the assessment of the mark’s distinctive character; and (iii) wrongly assessed that the documentation was insufficient to document that the mark had acquired distinctiveness and based its decision on misunderstanding and misconception of the evidence presented. Infringement of the principles of equal treatment and legitimate expectation, as the Board of Appeal wrongly rejected the importance of the fact that OHIM has accepted the applicant’s trademark ‘PHOTOS.COM’ for similar goods and services in a prior application.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2012089EN.01002201.xml

| 24.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 February 2012 — Peeters Landbouwmachines v OHIM — Fors MW (BIGAB)

(Case T-33/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark BIGAB - Absolute ground for refusal - No bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 89/35

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Peeters Landbouwmachines BV (Etten-Leur, Netherlands) (represented by: P. Claassen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: AS Fors MW (Saue, Estonia) (represented by M. Nielsen and J. Hansen, lawyers), intervener before the General Court

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 November 2010 (Case R 210/2010-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Peeters Landbouwmachines BV and AS Fors MW.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Peeters Landbouwmachines BV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Peeters Landbouwmachines BV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 12.3.2011.

1

---