alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-10628 

 (consolidated with Case No. 15-11624) 

v. Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

VERSATA SOFTWARE, INC. et al.

 Defendants. 

_________________________________/ 

ORDER REFERRING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE (ECF #328) 

 On January 12, 2018, Plaintiff Ford Motor Company filed a motion to strike 

the expert reports of Defendant Versata Software Inc.’s expert witnesses Drs. Malek 

and Shamos.1

 (See ECF #328.) Pursuant to the Court’s December 21, 2017, Order 

(see ECF #326), the Court’s Order Appointing Special Master (see ECF #230), and 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 53, the Court hereby REFERS Ford’s motion to 

Special Master Lawrence Graham for a report and recommendation. In Mr. 

Graham’s report, the Court asks him to, among other things, offer his 

                                                            

1

 Ford did not attach all of the exhibits to its motion on the Court’s public docket, in 

part because some of these exhibits include confidential information. Within seven 

days of this Order, Ford shall file all of the exhibits to its motion to strike with the 

Court. To the extent any of the exhibits contain confidential information, Ford may 

file the confidential portions of those exhibits under seal, subject to a future review 

of their confidentiality by the Court. 
2 

recommendation with respect to whether PDO-R2 is accused in this action and 

whether PDO-R2 is relevant to Versata’s claims. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

Dated: January 18, 2018 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on January 18, 2018, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (810) 341-9764
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice as required by 42 CFR 83.12(e) of a decision to evaluate a petition to designate a class of employees at the Nevada Test Site, Mercury, Nevada, to be included in the Special Exposure Cohort under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. The initial proposed definition for the class being evaluated, subject to revision as warranted by the evaluation, is as follows:

*Facility:*                         Nevada Test Site.                    

*Location:*                         Mercury, Nevada.                    

*Job Titles and/or Job Duties:*                         All workers at the Rainier Mesa, including areas 12, 16, and 20.                    

*Period of Employment:*                         March 1, 1966 through December 31, 1990.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Larry Elliott, Director, Office of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *OCAS@CDC.GOV*.                    

Dated: April 13, 2007.

John Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 07-2002 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-M
|   | (1) | Such      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2010, fully      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year      ended February 28, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Next 1 Interactive,      Inc.  |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      June 10, 2010 | /s/ William      Kerby           |   |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------|--------|
|                     | William      Kerby               |   |
|                     | Principal      Executive Officer |   |

----
#### Alexander Rich, *Respondent, v.*Simon Saloman and Emanuel Saloman, *Appellants*.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
# C_2012013EN.01001603.xml

| 14.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/16

---

Action brought on 31 October 2011 — Atlas v OHIM — Couleurs de Tollens-Agora (ARTIS)

(Case T-558/11)

2012/C 13/35

Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Atlas sp. z o.o. (Łódź, Republic of Poland) (represented by: R. Rumpel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Couleurs de Tollens-Agora S.a.s. (Clichy, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the action well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the action well founded;

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 July 2011, served on the applicant on 7 September 2011, in Case R 1253/2010-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 July 2011, served on the applicant on 7 September 2011, in Case R 1253/2010-1;

| — | in the alternative, amend the contested decision by granting registration of the mark ‘ARTIS’; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, amend the contested decision by granting registration of the mark ‘ARTIS’;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Atlas sp. z o.o.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: word mark ‘ARTIS’ for goods in Classes 2 and 17 — application No 6158761

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Couleurs de Tollens-Agora S.a.s.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: French word mark ‘ARTIS’ registered under No 93 484 880 for goods in Classes 1 and 19

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: opposition upheld

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (1) with regard to establishing the similarity of the trade marks and the likelihood of confusion on the part of consumers

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
#### § 190.03-1 General.

Each vessel must comply with the applicable requirements in Subchapter S of this chapter.

[CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51053, Nov. 4, 1983]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

Criminal No. 14-mj-30499

v.

D-2 Raphael Appollo Robinson,

D-3 Devante Dayzon Evans,

Defendants.

MOTION AND BRIEF FOR LEAVE TO

DISMISS COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Rule 48(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United 

States of America hereby moves for leave to dismiss without prejudice the 

complaint against Defendants Raphael Apollo Robinson and Devante Dayzon 

Evans. In this case, the government needs additional time

1) to develop and obtain evidence sufficient to establish defendants' guilt 

beyond a reasonable doubt; 

2) to investigate the full extent of the offenses in question and identify all 

other individuals who should be held criminally responsible for the 

offenses; or

3) to decide whether criminal prosecution of defendants for the offenses in 

question is in the public interest.

Case 2:14-mj-30499-DUTY ECF No. 29, PageID.49 Filed 11/07/14 Page 1 of 3
See generally United States v. Lovasco, 431 U.S. 783,790-96 (1977); 18 U.S.C. § 

3161(d)(1). The government’s ability to prosecute this case properly would be 

substantially impaired were it required to proceed to indictment or information 

within the 30-day period prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 

3161(b), 3161(h). Accordingly, the government requests leave to dismiss the 

complaint without prejudice.

Respectfully submitted,

BARBARA L. McQUADE

United States Attorney

s/Carl Gilmer-Hill 

Assistant United States Attorney

211 W. Fort Street, Suite 2001

Detroit, MI 48226

Carl.Gilmer-Hill@usdoj.gov

(313) 226-9585

Bar#CA161939

Dated: November 7, 2014 

Case 2:14-mj-30499-DUTY ECF No. 29, PageID.50 Filed 11/07/14 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on Friday, November 07, 2014, I electronically filed the 

foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which 

will send notification of such filing to the following:

Mark J. Kriger - mkriger@sbcglobal.net 

Maria Mannarino – mmannarino@comcast.net 

I further certify that I have mailed by United States Postal Service the 

document to the following non-CM/ECF participants:

Enter N/A or non-ECF party

s/Carl D. Gilmer-Hill 

Assistant United States Attorney

211 W. Fort Street, Suite 2001

Detroit, MI 48226

Carl.Gilmer-Hill@usdoj.gov

(313) 226-9585

Case 2:14-mj-30499-DUTY ECF No. 29, PageID.51 Filed 11/07/14 Page 3 of 3
2:15-mj-30194-DUTY Doc # 1 Filed 04/22/15 Pg 1 of 4 Pg ID 1
2:15-mj-30194-DUTY Doc # 1 Filed 04/22/15 Pg 2 of 4 Pg ID 2
2:15-mj-30194-DUTY Doc # 1 Filed 04/22/15 Pg 3 of 4 Pg ID 3
2:15-mj-30194-DUTY Doc # 1 Filed 04/22/15 Pg 4 of 4 Pg ID 4
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Central Federal Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date:      August 13, 2008
    /s/ Therese Ann LiutkusTherese Ann Liutkus, CPATreasurer and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.2





Certification
Pursuant to


Exchange
Act Rule 15d-14(b) and


18
U.S.C. Section 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Astrata Group Incorporated
(the ”Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Thomas A. Wagner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





i.
            The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act 1934;
and





ii.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been provided to Astrata Group Incorporated and will be retained by Astrata
Group Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.







Dated:  July
      21, 2008
            /s/
      THOMAS A.
      WAGNERName: Thomas A.
      WagnerTitle: Chief
      Financial Officer
Meeting with the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association with EPA

Purpose: To Discuss Proposed Modifications to IUR rule October 5, 2010 Attendees: Jim Cooper, NPRA; Jeff Gunnulfsen, NPRA, Ward Penberthy, EPA; Jim Willis, EPA; Sara Hisel

- McCoy, E PA; Karen Hoffman, EPA

On October 5, 2010, EPA met with the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association (NPRA) to discuss some of the proposed modifications to the Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule. NPRA is a national trade association that represen ts U.S. refiners and petrochemical manufacturers. During the meeting, EPA answered questions that clarified several of the proposed requirements. Topics discussed include: the IUR electronic reporting software and the opportunity

for testing and training; whether the Agency considered proposing the optional (instead of mandatory ) use of the reporting tool; the dy namic nature of chemicals manufactured in the U.S. and its effect on production volume from y ear to y ear. For the reporting of processing and use i nformation, NPRA commented on the burden associated with eliminating the 300,000 lb. reporting threshold and the replacement of the "readily obtainable" reporting standard with the more stringent "known to or reasonably ascertainable by " reporting standard

.

________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

 On April 24, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel Defendants to produce certain 

healthcare request forms. (Dkt. 162.) Defendants responded. (Dkt. 164.) As Plaintiffs requested 

that the Court decide their motion on an expedited basis, the Court set a hearing on the motion 

for today, June 1, 2016. 

 Prior to going on the record, the Court held a conference with all counsel during which 

the parties agreed to resolve the motion informally. Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, the Court 

HEREBY ORDERS: 

(1) Defendants are to provide Plaintiffs’ counsel a copy of the “Routine Dental 

Appointment” list maintained at each correctional facility without any identifying 

medical information by June 14, 2016; 

(2) All lists are to be designated “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” and the lists (and the information 

the lists contain) are to be disclosed only to (1) counsel of record in this case and (2) staff 

ROBERT JOHANNES, and 

MICHAEL WORONIECKI, 

individually, and on behalf of all other 

similarly situated prisoners, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 

v. 

 

HEIDI WASHINGTON, Director of the 

Michigan Department of Corrections, and 

DALTON SANDERS, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 14-11691 

Honorable Laurie J. Michelson 

Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub 

ORDER RESOLVING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL [162] 

Case 2:14-cv-11691-LJM-MKM ECF No. 166, PageID.4811 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 2
2 

of counsel of record insofar as disclosure to staff is absolutely necessary to assist counsel 

with this case; 

(3) Counsel and staff who have become privy to the information on the lists shall not share 

that information with anyone; 

(4) Plaintiff Johannes’ claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 

(5) Dalton Sanders is DISMISSED from this case as the only remaining claims against him 

were Johannes’; and 

(6) No motions shall be filed in this case until Plaintiffs file an amended complaint consistent 

with this Court’s order of April 19, 2016 (Dkt. 161). 

SO ORDERED. 

s/Laurie J. Michelson 

LAURIE J. MICHELSON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 Dated: June 2, 2016 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing document was served on the attorneys 

and/or parties of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on June 2, 2016. 

 s/Jane Johnson 

Case Manager to 

 Honorable Laurie J. Michelson 

Case 2:14-cv-11691-LJM-MKM ECF No. 166, PageID.4812 Filed 06/02/16 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6023
KEITH WILLIAM DEBLASIO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-3640-JFM) Submitted: March 31, 1997 Decided: April 22, 1997 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith William DeBlasio, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* We also deny DeBlasio's motion for appointment of counsel. 2 PER CURIAM: Keith Williams DeBlasio appeals from the district court's order dismissing his claims against the United States under theFederal Torts Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error in its dismissal of DeBlasio's action. We therefore affirm on the reasoning of the district court, DeBlasio v. United States, No. CA-96-3640-JFM (D. Md. Dec. 4, 1996), but modify to reflect that the dismissal of all claims is without prejudice for DeBlasio to file a complaint against the appropriate individuals. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
#### § 179.340 Trunks.

Where a trunk (*i.e.*, an enclosed passageway through a deck or bulkhead) is installed, it must comply with the requirements of § 179.360(a)(1) and with the requirements of § 171.113 in subchapter S of this chapter.
PLANET HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
         Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-31683, No. 333-31685 and No. 333-66659)
         and on Form S-3 (No. 333-67101 and No. 333-67467) of Planet Hollywood
         International, Inc. of our report dated March 26, 1999 which is
         incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended.

         PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

         Orlando, Florida
         April 8, 1999
###### Editorial Note on Part 161

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 161 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49238, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 161.011-1 Purpose.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76703, Sept. 18, 2024.

This subpart prescribes approval requirements for emergency position indicating radiobeacons (EPIRB).

[39 FR 10139, Mar. 18, 1974]
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-11499-BAF-MJH

JOHN DOE, subscriber assigned IP address

69.245.115.6,

Defendant.

/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

WITH PREJUDICE OF JOHN DOE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, Plaintiff has settled this matter with John Doe

(“Defendant”). Pursuant to the settlement agreement’s terms, Plaintiff hereby voluntarily

dismisses Defendant from this action with prejudice. John Doe was assigned the IP address

69.245.115.6. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) Defendant John Doe has neither answered

Plaintiff’s Complaint nor filed a motion for summary judgment.

Consistent herewith Plaintiff consents to the Court having its case closed for

administrative purposes.

Dated: August 4, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Paul J. Nicoletti

Paul J. Nicoletti

pauljnicoletti@gmail.com

NICOLETTI LAW, PLC

33717 Woodward Avenue, Suite #433

Birmingham, Michigan 48009

Phone: (248) 203-7800

Attorney for Plaintiff

2:15-cv-11499-BAF-MJH Doc # 6 Filed 08/04/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 52
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 4, 2015, I electronically filed the foregoing document with

the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF and that service was perfected on all counsel of record and

interested parties through this system.

By: /s/ Paul J. Nicoletti_______

Paul J. Nicoletti

2:15-cv-11499-BAF-MJH Doc # 6 Filed 08/04/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 53
#### § 201.16 Authority for representation.

Any individual acting in a representative capacity in any proceeding before the Administration may be required by the Administration or the Presiding Officer to show his authority to act in such capacity.