alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# National Physical Fitness and Sports Month, 2007

National Physical Fitness and Sports Month is an opportunity to educate Americans about the importance of healthy habits and regular physical activity. During this annual observance, we renew our commitment to helping keep our citizens physically active, and we recognize the value of incorporating exercise and sports into our daily lives. 

Regular physical activity is vital to good health. By maintaining an active lifestyle, citizens can reduce their risk of developing chronic health conditions. Participating in outdoor activities and individual or team sports helps promote physical fitness. These activities also teach young people important life lessons, including teamwork, patience, and discipline. 

My Administration is committed to helping ensure the good health of all Americans. This year is the fifth anniversary of the HealthierUS initiative, which helps Americans improve their personal health and fitness and prevent disease. The President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports is spreading the message that a healthy America is a country that is physically active. Additionally, this year the Department of Health and Human Services and its partners launched a public awareness campaign to promote exercise and eating well to America's youth. This campaign encourages kids to “Be a Player: Get Up and Play an Hour a Day.” To find out other ways to improve health, Americans can visit fitness.gov or presidentschallenge.org. By making physical fitness a priority, our citizens can help prevent disease and live healthier lives. 

NOW, THEREFORE I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 2007 as National Physical Fitness and Sports Month. I call upon my fellow citizens to participate in athletic activities and make physical fitness a priority in their lives. I also encourage individuals, schools, and communities to celebrate this month with appropriate activities and programs.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this first day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 07-2219

Billing code 3195-01-P
§ 169.678 Main distribution panels and switchboards. ( a ) A distribution panel to which the generator leads are connected, and from which the electric leads throughout the vessel directly or indirectly receive their electric power is a switchboard.
( b ) Each switchboard must have a driphood or an equivalent means of protecting against falling liquid.
( c ) Nonconductive deck materials, mats, or gratings must be provided in front of each switchboard.
( d ) If the switchboard is accessible from the rear, nonconductive deck material, mats, or gratings must be provided in the rear of the switchboard.
( e ) Metal cases of instruments and secondary windings of instrument transformers must be grounded.
( f ) Each switchboard must be placed in a location that is accessible, adequately ventilated, and as dry as practicable. All uninsulated current carrying parts must be mounted on nonabsorbent, noncombustible, high dielectric insulating material.
( g ) Each switchboard must be of the dead front type.
( h ) Each switchboard must have front and, if accessible from the back, rear non-conducting hand rails except on vessels where the surrounding bulkheads and decks are of an insulating material such as fiberglass or wood.
§ 172.133 Character of damage. ( a ) If a type I hull is required, design calculations must show that the vessel can survive damage at any location.
( b ) Except as provided in § 153.7 of this chapter, if a type II hull is required, design calculations must show that a vessel— ( 1 ) Longer than 492 feet (150 meters) in length can survive damage at any location; and
( 2 ) Except as specified in paragraph (d) of this section, 492 feet (150 meters) or less in length can survive damage at any location.
( c ) If a Type III hull is required, design calculations must show that a vessel— ( 1 ) Except as specified in paragraph (d) of this section, 410 feet (125 meters) in length or longer can survive damage at any location; and
( 2 ) Less than 410 feet (125 meters) in length can survive damage at any location except to an aft machinery space.
( d ) A vessel described in paragraph (b)(2) or (c)(1) of this section need not be designed to survive damage to a main transverse watertight bulkhead bounding an aft machinery space. Except as provided in § 153.7 of this chapter, the machinery space must be calculated as a single floodable compartment.
[CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51040, Nov. 4, 1983, as amended by CGD 81-101, 52 FR 7799, Mar. 12, 1987]
§ 174.325 Equalization. When doing the calculations required by § 174.310 of this subpart— ( a ) Equalization arrangements requiring mechanical aids, such as valves, may not be assumed to be effective in reducing the angle of heel; and
( b ) Spaces joined by ducts may be assumed to be common spaces only if equalization takes place within 15 minutes after flooding begins.
MORRISON FRESH COOKING, INC.

EXHIBIT 11

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER-SHARE DATA)
                                                    Fiscal Year Ended
                                                May 31,   June 1,  June 3,
                                                 1997      1996     1995
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER COMMON AND COMMON
  EQUIVALENT SHARE

Average common shares outstanding.........       9,067     8,954     (1)
Average additional common shares
  issuable on exercise of dilutive
  stock options (computed by use of
  the "treasury stock method", at the               33   *
  average market price)...................
Number of shares used in computation of
  primary earnings per share..............       9,100   * 8,954    8,981

Net Income (Loss).........................      $2,732   ($9,894) $11,374

Primary earnings per common and
  common equivalent share.................       $0.30    ($1.10)   $1.27

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON AND
  COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE

Average common shares outstanding.........       9,067     8,954     (1)
Average additional common shares issuable
  on exercise of dilutive stock options
  (computed by use of the "treasury stock
  method", at the higher of period-end              33   *
  or average market price)................
Number of shares used in computation of
  fully diluted earnings per share........       9,100   * 8,954    8,981

Net Income (Loss).........................      $2,732   ($9,894) $11,374

Fully diluted earnings per common and
  common equivalent share.................       $0.30    ($1.10)   $1.27


*    Per APB 15, due to a net loss dilutive stock options are not reported
     because its effect is antidilutive.

(1)  Prior to the Distribution earnings per share was calculated based on
     the average number of MRI common shares outstanding adjusted for the
     1-for-4 distribution ratio.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the "Form 10-Q") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").





I, Tracey A. Welsh, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Issuer, certify that to my knowledge:





(i)
the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii)
the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.





Dated: August 14, 2012





/s/ Tracey A. Welsh


Tracey A. Welsh


Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
# C_2012032EN.01002903.xml

| 4.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/29

---

Action brought on 25 November 2011 — Eni v OHIM — EMI (IP) (ENI)

(Case T-599/11)

2012/C 32/61

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Eni SpA (Roma, Italy) (represented by: D. De Simone and G. Orsoni, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: EMI (IP) Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 September 2011 in case R 2439/2010-1; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 September 2011 in case R 2439/2010-1; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of all instances of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of all instances of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘ENI’, for goods and services in classes 1-4, 6-7, 9, 11, 14, 16-19, 22, 25 and 35 to 45 — Community trade mark application No 6488076

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 4197315 of the word mark ‘EMI’, for goods and services in classes 9, 16, 35, 38, 41 and 42; Community trade mark registration No 6167357 of the figurative mark ‘EMI’, for goods and services in classes 9, 16, 28, 35, 38, 41 and 42

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Partially upheld the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The applicant challenges the mentioned decision of the First Board of Appeal on the following three grounds: (i) erroneous and non-motivated finding of similarity of goods and services, based on the misunderstanding and misapplication of previous case-law on the point; (ii) erroneous interpretation and application of the Praktiker case, denoting a misunderstanding of its anti-monopolistic inspiring principles and in particular of the ratio that inspired the introduction of registrability of retail services; and (iii) erroneous finding of similarity of signs, and erroneous finding of likelihood of confusion.

Pleas in law:

---
26563

PROGRESS POLREP

I . HEADIN G

Date: 1/3/199 1 From : Mike Zimmernfa T o : Stephe n Luftwig , Region VII I Director ERD Subject: Midval e Sla g (NPL ) - Abandoned Lab Polrep: POLREP 6

I I . BACKGROUN D

Sit e No: 71 D.O. No: 57 Response Authority : CERCLA N P L Status: Proposed NP L Start Date: 12/12/199 0

 v v

Approval Status: Director Hazardous Wast e Management Divisio n Status of Actio n Memorandum: The signin g of the Actio n Memorandum

is pendin g review.

III . RESPONS E INFORMATIO N

A . Situatio n

T he Midval e Sla g NPL Sit e (proposed ) i s located at approximatel y

6 00 East , 7700 South, Midvale . The site is located jus t north of

t he Sharon Stee l NPL site. An analytical laboratory was observed

on the site containin g hazardous chemicals and a removal action

w as initiated (pleas e refer to previous Polreps for complet e

background information) .

Cold and snowy condition s continue at the site causing slight

weather related delays .

B. Action s Take n

T he EPS OSC , ERGS crew and TAT returned to the site on 1/2/1991. T he ERGS began lab packin g of containers by hazard clas s in the

gate building. The lab packin g process involves placin g the

chemicals (stil l in their origial containers) into 5 or 55-gallo n

drums with sawdust . Lab packin g of combustibles , flammables , ORM- E, acids , and poisons began in the gate building.

C. Next Steps

Continue lab packin g of chemicals . Complet e hazard categorizatio n

of remaining unknowns. Arrange for off-sit e disposal of

chemicals . Dispose of explosive compounds by detonatio n at the Sharo n Stee l site.
D. Key Issue s

Non e to report

I V . COS T INFORMATIO N

ERGS T A T E PA

Amount Budgeted

$ 100,000

50,000

25,000

Cost s

to Date

61,000

13,500

13,000

Balance

39,000

36,500

12,000

TOTAL 175,000 87,500 87,500
2004 ICG Performance Plan



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 2004 ICG Performance Plan 
 Summary

  

				
	 	  	Weighting

	 
	 Goal
	  	 	 
		
	 Quantitative Goals
	  	 	 
		
	 Individual Partner Company Performance :
	  	 	 
	 - Revenue performance [* * *]
	  	27	%
	 - Net Earnings performance [* * *]
	  	18	%
		
	   (Weight according to NAV of PCO relative to total/ Exclude positive/negative one-time contributors to Net Earnings)
	  	 	 
		
	 Repay/Refinance Convertible Note Balance
	  	20	%
		
	 Corporate Liquidity performance
	  	15	%
	 [* * *]
	  	 	 
		
	 Qualitative Goals
	  	10	%
		
	 - Performance/competency of partner company executives
	  	 	 
	 - Reaction to unforeseen market/business conditions
	  	 	 
	 - Budget performance
	  	 	 
	 - Shareholder returns
	  	 	 
	 - Emerging company performance
	  	 	 
		
	 Long-term strategic plan
	  	10	%


 [* * *]  Confidential treatment requested
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 86 (Friday, May 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 25323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2191]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Initial Review Group, Clinical and Treatment 
Subcommittee.
    Date: June 5-6, 2007.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Crown Plaza--Silver Spring, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver 
Spring, MD 20910.
    Contact Person: Katrina L Foster, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Inst on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism, National 
Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm. 3042, Rockville, MD 
20852, 301-443-4032, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#adc6ccd9dfc4c3ccedc0ccc4c183c3c4c583cac2db"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b2d9d3c6c0dbdcd3f2dfd3dbde9cdcdbda9cd5ddc4">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 26, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2191 Filed 5-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 183.378 Ungrounded systems.

Each ungrounded system must be provided with a suitably sensitive ground detection system located at the respective switchboard that provides continuous indication of circuit status to ground with a provision to momentarily remove the indicating device from the reference ground.

[CGD 85-080, 62 FR 51358, Sept. 30, 1997]
# C_2013260EN.01001002.xml

| 7.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 July 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te Leeuwarden — Netherlands) — Fiscale eenheid PPG Holdings BV cs te Hoogezand v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Noord/kantoor Groningen

(Case C-26/12) (1)

1

(Value added tax - Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC - Articles 17 and 13B(d)(6) - Exemptions - Deduction of input tax - Pension fund - Concept of ‘management of special investment funds’)

2013/C 260/18

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Gerechtshof te Leeuwarden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Fiscale eenheid PPG Holdings BV cs te Hoogezand

Applicant:

Defendant: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Noord/kantoor Groningen

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Gerechtshof te Leeuwarden — Interpretation of Articles 13B(d)(6) and 17 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) and of Articles 135(1)(g), 168 and 169 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 concerning the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1) — Deduction of input tax — Taxable person having, under national legislation on pensions, set up a pension fund in order to safeguard the pension rights of his employees as members of that fund — Deduction of input tax on services supplied to him for the purposes of the management of the pension fund

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 17 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment must be interpreted as meaning that a taxable person who has set up a pension fund in the form of a legally and fiscally separate entity, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, in order to safeguard the pension rights of his employees and former employees, is entitled to deduct the value added tax he has paid on services relating to the management and operation of that fund, provided that the existence of a direct and immediate link is apparent from all the circumstances of the transactions in question.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 31.3.2012.

1

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

D’ANDRE ALEXANDER,

Plaintiff, No. 15-10294

v. District Judge David M. Lawson

Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

A. HOFFMAN, FLAUGHER, O’NIEZEL,

JEFF STOLTENBER, ROZIER, PUTNAM

WELTERE, VITTITOW, TURNER, 

BURROWS, DONALD RICUMSTRICT,

O’BELL T. WINN, FREED, JAMES 

ZUMMER, TOM FINCO, PAYNE, ROBERT

NORTON, ROPELIJI, KARL LNU, 

THOMAS LNU, and VANSURMAN,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER

On January 23,2015, Plaintiff D’Andre Alexander, a prison inmate in the custody

of the Michigan Department of Corrections (“MDOC”), filed a pro se civil complaint

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, naming (or in some instances partially naming) 21

Defendants. The complaint and exhibits consume 152 pages. On January 27, 2015, the

Court, noting that Plaintiff had failed to file a sufficient number of copies for service, see

Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(1), ordered him to file 22 additional copies within 30 days. [Doc. #4].

Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion for an Order Directing Marquette Branch Prison

employees to Copy Plaintiff’s Complaint at their own Expense [Doc. #9], second motion

requesting the same relief [Doc. #11], and Motion to Extend Deadline for filing additional

copies [Doc. #13].

In the motion to extend [Doc. #13], Plaintiff explains that following his filing of

-1-

2:15-cv-10294-DML-RSW Doc # 14 Filed 04/13/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 198
prison grievances, his complaint was picked up for copying, and he received the copies on

March 17, 2015. The docket entries show that the deficiency has been corrected, and the

copies were provided to this Court on April 2, 2015.

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motions for the MDOC to make copies [Doc. #9 and Doc.

#11] are DENIED AS MOOT.

Plaintiff’s motion to extend deadline for filing copies [Doc. #13] is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/R. Steven Whalen 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dated: April 13, 2015

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on

April 13, 2015, electronically and/or by U.S. mail.

s/Carolyn M. Ciesla

Case Manager 

-2-

2:15-cv-10294-DML-RSW Doc # 14 Filed 04/13/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 199
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS**

The firm of W.D. Von Gonten & Co. consents to theuse of its name and to the use of its report regarding Evolution PetroleumCorporation Proved Reserves and Future Net Revenues “as of July 1, 2005 throughJuly 1, 2007” in the relevant pages of the 10-KSB of Evolution PetroleumCorporation for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.

W.D. Von Gonten & Co. has no interests inEvolution Petroleum Corporation or in any affiliated companies or subsidiariesand is not to receive any such interest as payment for such reports and hasno director, officer or employee otherwise connected with Evolution PetroleumCorporation. Evolution Petroleum Corporation does not employ us on a contingent basis.

Yours truly,

W.D. VON GONTEN & CO.

 

/s/ William D. Von Gonten, Jr.

 

By: William D. VonGonten, Jr.

TX #73244

Its: President

 

September 25, 2007

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6388

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAVE ANDRAE TAYLOR, a/k/a Indian, a/k/a Nicholas, a/k/a Spike,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:99-cr-00145-REP-2)

Submitted: July 18, 2017 Decided: August 9, 2017

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dave Andrae Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Gurney Wingate Grant, II, 

Katherine Lee Martin, Robert E. Trono, Assistant United States Attorneys, Heather Hart 

Mansfield, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia; 

Michael Arlen Jagels, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Dave Andrae Taylor appeals the district court’s order construing his second 

motion to reduce sentence based on Amendment 782 to the Guidelines as a motion to

reconsider and denying it for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

United States v. Taylor, No. 3:99-cr-00145-REP-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 6, 2017). We deny 

Taylor’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED