alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                       |                     |              
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------- | -------------
|Household Finance Corporation                                          |                     |              
|Household Consumer Loan Corporation                                    |                    
|Household Consumer Loan Trust 1996-1                                   | Total 2001 Payments
|**********************************************************************
|                                                                       |                     |              
|Original Principal Class A                                             | 638,400,000.00      |              
|Number of Class A Bonds (000's)                                        | 638,400.00          |              
|Original Principal Class B                                             | 136,244,640.00      |              
|Number of Class B Bond (000's)                                         | 136,244.64          |              
|Original Principal Certificates                                        | 25,455,360.00       |              
|Number of Certificate Bond (000's)                                     | 25,455.36           |              
|                                                                       |                     |              
|Class A  Principal Distribution                                        |                     | 39,349,738.97
|Class A  Interest Distribution                                         |                     | 4,912,575.47 
|                                                                       |                     |              
|Class B  Principal Distribution                                        |                     | 26,495,809.06
|Class B  Interest Distribution                                         |                     | 3,575,678.54 
|                                                                       |                     |              
|Certificates  Principal Distribution                                   | 2,649,580.91       
|Certificates  Interest Distribution                                    |                     | 385,754.51   
|                                                                       |                     |              
|                                                                       |                     |
#### Thomas Kelly, Respondent, *v.*James J. McMahon, Appellant.

Order apipealed from affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
#### Joseph Schantz and others, *Appellants, v.*Henry Schantz, *Respondent*.

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Held, that the order striking the cause from the circuit calendar is not appealable.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
        


       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                   0
<SECURITIES>                       185,251
<RECEIVABLES>                      859,048
<ALLOWANCES>                       (15,000)
<INVENTORY>                      3,014,183
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 5,029,846
<PP&E>                           3,318,732
<DEPRECIATION>                  (1,965,875)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   8,669,852
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            3,546,707
<BONDS>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                         4,126,392
<OTHER-SE>                         921,785
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     5,048,177
<SALES>                         12,287,973
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                12,287,973
<CGS>                            7,013,069
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    5,018,584
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     4,824
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  74,852
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    261,144
<INCOME-TAX>                       (38,200)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                299,344
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    299,344
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                       299,344
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                         .13
        

        

</TABLE>
#### STANTON M. PASCAL ET AL., PARTNERS, ETC., APPELLEES, v. MONROE D. HESS, APPELLANT.

Argued October 1, 1929

Decided October 15, 1929.

Before Justices Paekek, Black and Bodine.

Eor the appellant, *Lionel P. Kristeller (Saul J. Zuclcer,*on the brief).

Eor the appellee, *George Furst.*

Pee Ctjeiam:.

The controlling question is whether the trial court erred in directing a verdict for plaintiff.

Plaintiffs are stock brokers and sued for a balance of $187.50 claimed to be due them from defendant in a stock transaction. The state of demand was in two counts, the first based on the theory of having purchased the sotck for defendant at his request, defendant’s refusal to take the stock *885and reimburse them ior their cash outlay and commission, and a net loss sustained on their resale of the stock for defendant’s account. The second count was based on the theory of a direct contract of sale and purchase between plaintiffs and defendant, and the refusal of defendant to accept and pay for the stock. At the trial plaintiffs were required to elect on which count they would proceed, and without objecting, elected to proceed on the first, and waived the second. Their claim was therefore restricted to the theory of the first count.

It may well be, though we do not decide the point, that the jury would have been justified in finding that the transaction was of the nature set up in the first count. But wo do decide, that they would have been legally justified on the evidence in saying that it was a direct contract of sale between the parties, which would probably be unenforceable on account of the statute of frauds. The written statement by plaintiffs to defendant confirms a “sale to him.” Their own letter threatening resale and suit speaks of stock “which we sold to you some days ago.” Their final statement after resale and claiming a balance reads in part, “we have sold to you one hundred shares,” &c. The testimony of one of the partners may be taken as treating the matter in the -same way. Plaintiffs did not report purchase price plus commission, and did not charge a commission on resale.

We consider that in the face of such evidence as this, it was clearly erroneous to direct a verdict for the plaintiffs. The judgment will therefore be reversed to the end that a new trial be had.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 78 (Tuesday, April 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20321]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2014]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management


Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument Advisory 
Committee

AGENCIES: Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture; and Bureau of 
Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meetings of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains 
National Monument Advisory Committee for 2007 and 2008.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 
(FACA), the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument 
Advisory Committee (Monument Advisory Committee) will meet as indicated 
below.

DATES: 
    <bullet> March 3, 2007.
    <bullet> June 2, 2007.
    <bullet> September 8, 2007.
    <bullet> December 1, 2007.
    <bullet> March 1, 2008.
    <bullet> June 7, 2008.
    <bullet> September 6, 2008.
    <bullet> December 6, 2008.
    All meetings of the Monument Advisory Committee will start at 9 
a.m. and conclude at 1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Meetings of the Monument Advisory Committee will be held at 
the Palm Desert City Council Chambers, 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm 
Desert, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Foote, Monument Manager, Santa 
Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument, c/o Bureau of Land 
Management, P.O. Box 581260, North Palm Springs, CA 92258; phone (760) 
251-4800.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Meetings of the Monument Advisory Committee 
focus on implementation of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains 
National Monument Management Plan. A public comment period, when 
members of the public may address the Monument Advisory Committee, will 
occur at 11 a.m. during each meeting. Written comments may be sent to 
the Monument Manager at the address listed above. All meetings are open 
to the public; however, transportation, lodging, and meals are the 
responsibility of the participating public.

    Dated: February 9, 2007.
Laurie Rosenthal,
District Ranger, Forest Service, San Jacinto Ranger District, San 
Bernardino National Forest.
    Dated: February 9, 2007.
John R. Kalish,
Acting Field Manager, Bureau of Land Management, Palm Springs-South 
Coast Field Office.
    Dated: February 9, 2007.
Jim Foote,
Monument Manager, Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National 
Monument.
[FR Doc. 07-2014 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Bank of South Carolina 10-K

 

 

**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors

Bank of South Carolina Corporation

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statementon Form S-3 of our report dated March 10, 2014, relating to our audit of the consolidated balance sheet of Bank of South CarolinaCorporation and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2013 and related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders’equity and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K and tothe reference to our Firm under the heading “Experts” in the Registration Statement.
J ULIE O ETTINGER M ANAGING D IRECTOR –I NTERNATIONAL & R EGULATORY A FFAIRS (202) 296-2370 (202) 296-2869 F AX

JULIE

. OETTINGER @ UNITED

. COM

March 26, 2010 Esta Rosenberg, Chief U.S. Carrier Licensing Division U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Notice of United Air Lines, Inc. and Croatia Airlines

Docket DOT-OST-2007-28897

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

Pursuant to the blanket Statement of Author ization granted to United Air Lines, Inc. (“United”) and Croatia Airlines on March 22, 2010 in the above-referenced docket, United hereby notifies the Department of the display of Croatia Airlines’ “OU*” designator code on flights operated by United from Chicago, Illinoi s to Brussels, Belgium (ORD-BRU) and Rome, Italy (ORD-FCO). The display of the OU* designator code on the ORD-BRU service will commence on or after April 25, 2010 and on the ORD-FCO seasonal servi ce on or after May 1,

2010.

Respectfully submitted,

Julie Oettinger Managing Di rector—International & Regulatory Affairs

cc: Service ListCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing document on all persons

named below by causing a copy to be sent via email.

byerlyjr@state.gov

carl.nelson@aa.com donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

hkamen@coair.com howard_kass@usairways.com john.allen@faa.gov

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

david.heffernan@wilmerhale.com

Annalei Avanceña Advisor—Regulatory Affairs

DATED: March 26, 2010
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet,

and Strip From Brazil, China, Thailand,

and the United Arab Emirates

Investigation Nos. 731-TA-1131-1134 (Preliminary)

Publication 3962 November 2007

Washington, DC 20436
U.S. International Trade Commission

Robert A. Rogowsky

Director of Operations

COMMISSIONERS

Address all communications to

Secretary to the Commission

United States International Trade Commission

Washington, DC 20436

Deanna Tanner Okun

Shara L. Aranoff, Vice Chairman

Daniel R. Pearson, Chairman

Charlotte R. Lane

Irving A. Williamson

Dean A. Pinkert

Staff assigned

Jim McClure, Investigator

Raymond L. Cantrell, Industry Analyst

William L. Greene, Economist

John Ascienzo, Accountant

Steven Hudgens, Senior Statistician

Rhonda Hughes, Attorney

George L. Deyman, Supervisory Investigator
U.S. International Trade Commission

Washington, DC 20436

November 2007

www.usitc.gov

Publication 3962

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet,

and Strip From Brazil, China, Thailand,

and the United Arab Emirates

Investigation Nos. 731-TA-1131-1134 (Preliminary)
#### § 249.1 Purpose.

This part prescribes certain regulations governing the placement of marine hull insurance on vessels built or operated with subsidy or covered by vessel obligation guarantees issued pursuant to Title XI of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended (Act). (46 U.S.C. 1271-1279)
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2254 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify presumptions relating 

to the exposure of certain veterans who served in the vicinity of the 

Republic of Vietnam. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2009 

Mr. FILNER (for himself, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. KAGEN, Mr. 

LATHAM, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. HALL of New 

York, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. REYES, Mr. PASTOR of Arizona, Mr. ORTIZ, 

Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. TIM MURPHY

of Pennsylvania, and Mr. PLATTS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify presumptions relating to the exposure of certain veterans who 

served in the vicinity of the Republic of Vietnam. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Agent Orange Equity 

5 Act of 2009’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2254 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF PRESUMPTIONS OF EXPOSURE 

2 FOR VETERANS WHO SERVED IN THE VICIN3 ITY OF THE REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM. 

4 (a) CLARIFICATION.—Section 1116 of title 38, 

5 United States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) in subsections (a)(1) and (f), by striking ‘‘a 

7 veteran who, during active military, naval, or air 

8 service, served in the Republic of Vietnam during 

9 the period beginning on January 9, 1962, and end10 ing on May 7, 1975’’ and inserting ‘‘a veteran de11 scribed in subsection (g)’’; and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub13 section: 

14 ‘‘(g) A veteran described in this subsection is a vet15 eran who— 

16 ‘‘(1) during active military, naval, or air serv17 ice— 

18 ‘‘(A) served in the Republic of Vietnam 

19 (including the inland waterways, ports, and har20 bors of such Republic, the waters offshore of 

21 such Republic, and the airspace above such Re22 public) during the period beginning on January 

23 9, 1962, and ending on May 7, 1975; or 

24 ‘‘(B) served in Johnston Island during the 

25 period beginning on April 1, 1972, and ending 

26 on September 30, 1977; or 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2254 IH

1 ‘‘(2) received the Vietnam Service Medal or the 

2 Vietnam Campaign Medal.’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 subsection (a) shall take effect as of September 25, 1985. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 15

- 00442

- CR

Randy Eugene Smith

v. The State of Texas

On a ppeal from the 24th District Court of Calhoun County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2013

- 08

- 7364

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this c ause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 14, 2016
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

# ACTION:

Quarterly meeting notice. 

# SUMMARY:

On April 10, 2007 (72 FR 17881), the Department of Defense published a notice with the subject heading “Department of Defense Task Force on the Future of Military Health Care” which should have read “Board of Regents of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences”. This notice corrects the title for that notice.  All other information remains unchanged.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION AND BASE ACCESS PROCEDURES CONTACT:

 Janet S. Taylor, Designated Federal Officer.

Dated: April 23, 2007.

L.M. Bynum, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.

[FR Doc. 07-2072 Filed 4-24-07; 10:49 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Declan A. French, Chief Executive Officer of Thinkpath Inc., certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thinkpath Inc.;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
         untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
         necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
         under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
         the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
         information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
         material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
         cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
         this quarterly report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
         establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
         defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
         we have:

                  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
         that material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
         is being prepared;

                  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
         controls and procedures as of a date within 45 days prior to the filing
         date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

                  c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
         the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
         our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
         on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
         audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

                  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
         internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability
         to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

                  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
         management or other employees who have a significant role in the
         registrant's internal controls.


Date: August 22, 2005
                                            /S/ DECLAN FRENCH
                                            -----------------

                                            Declan A. French
                                            Chief Executive Officer
§ 163.003-27 Production tests and examination. ( a ) *General.* Each ladder produced under Coast Guard approval must be tested in accordance with this section and subpart 159.007 of this chapter. Steps that fail testing may not be marked with the Coast Guard approval number and each assembled ladder that fails testing may not be sold as Coast Guard approved.
( b ) *Test No. 1: Steps.* Steps must be separated into lots of 100 steps or less. Steps of different types must be placed in separate lots. One step from each lot must be selected at random and tested as described in § 163.003-21(c)(2) except that supports are placed under the step at the points where it would be attached to suspension members in an assembled ladder. If the step fails the test, ten more steps must be selected at random from the lot and tested. If one or more of the ten steps fails the test, each step in the lot must be tested. No step that has any residual deflection after the test may be used in a ladder represented by the manufacturer as Coast Guard approved.
( c ) *Test No. 2: Ladders.* Assembled ladders must be separated into lots of 20 ladders or less. One ladder must be selected at random from the ladders in each lot. The ladder selected must be at least 3 m (10 ft.) long or, if each ladder in the lot is less than 3 m long, a ladder of the longest length in the lot must be selected. The ladder must be tested as prescribed in § 163.003-21(c)(3) except that only a 3 m section of the ladder need be subjected to the static load. If the ladder fails the test, each other ladder in the lot must be tested.
( d ) *Independent laboratory.* Each production test must be conducted or supervised by an independent laboratory. However, if a test is performed more than 4 different times per year, laboratory participation is required only 4 times per year. If the laboratory does not participate in all tests, the times of laboratory participation must be as selected by the laboratory. The times selected must provide for effective monitoring throughout the production schedule.
( e ) *Visual examination.* The visual examination described in § 163.003-21(b) must be conducted as a part of each production test.
[CGD 74-140, 46 FR 63291, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended by USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58286, Sept. 29, 2014]