alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.29


                               RESTATED EXHIBIT B

-     Reimbursement for reasonable expenses incurred in Employee's three House
      hunting trips to Knoxville all in accordance with the Company's expense
      reimbursement policies. (a).

-     Packing, Transportation and reasonable Insurance thereon by a Team Health
      approved mover of household goods (a).

-     Reimbursement for up to 45 days of temporary housing payments in
      Knoxville, TN while Employee simultaneously maintain a residence in
      Brentwood, TN and up to an additional 45 days of temporary housing once
      Employee and his family have relocated to Knoxville, TN. This
      reimbursement is subject to the Company's expense reimbursement policies.

-     Employee will be reimbursed for the costs for up to 90 days storage in
      Knoxville, TN of Employee's household goods.

-     Employer will reimburse Employee up to a maximum of fifty thousand
      ($50,000) dollars for the customary closing costs associated with
      Employee's sale of his residence in Brentwood, TN, and his purchase of a
      residence in the Knoxville, TN area, including any costs associated with
      either residence related to (i) real estate commissions, (ii) interest or
      points, or (iii) attorneys fees. (a)

-     As additional consideration for the execution of this Agreement by
      Employee and Employees performance in accordance with this Agreement, and
      in lieu of Employer assuming any risk for the sale of Employee's current
      residence, Employer agrees to pay Employee One Hundred Thousand ($100,000)
      dollars as a bonus, one half to be paid within 10 days after the Effective
      Date and the other half on or before December 31, 2004.

This Restated Exhibit B is acknowledged as a replacement to the former Exhibit B
to the Employment Agreement between Greg Roth and Team Health, dated as of
October 4, 2004.

Dated this 28th day of January, 2005.

S/ Lynn Massingale            S/ Gregory S. Roth
Team Health by Lynn           Gregory S. Roth
Massingale, Chief Executive
Officer

-----------------------------

      (a)   Grossed up for Federal Income Taxes.



                                       3
,

,

Faulk, Scott (OSn

From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Hi there,

Tanja Fransen <mtwxgirl@gmail.com>

Monday, July 22, 2013 11:16 AM

EAS(OST)

Montana EASComments

em JUt: I 0 2: 3S

I just read the proposals for EAS service in eastern Montana, and am disappointed to see that one airline didn't

even bid on a route to Glasgow, MT.

http://www.easflights.com/20 13/071and-montana -is-outl#more-89 5

http://www ..airlineinfo.com/ostpdf88/153 ,pdf

I think one of the reasons Silver Airways struggled in Glasgow, MT was their flight schedules, They left too

late in the morning to make some of the connections they needed in Billings to larger cities like Denver, Salt

Lake and Minneapolis. And, on the return trip, they also had some odd hours, which would mean you had to sit

in the airport for a long time for that evening flight in to Glasgow. It generally made more sense to drive to

Williston, ND or Billings, MT to avoid these huge waiting times between flights. I know many people who

opted to drive 150 to 275 miles to catch a flight elsewhere rather than sit in the Billings airport for 4-6 hours at a

time.

I have been on many flights in my 12 years living here. There are some flights that are pretty empty, but the

overwhelming majority of them have at least 60-75% capacity. And during hunting season, I've many times

offered to leave.my luggage behind in Billings to be delivered later because the seats were full and we had

reached our weight limits.

I've visited with and assisted people who have gone to Billings for the day for medical issues, or appointments.

Sometimes a 4.5 hour car ride is too much for them.

I can tell all the sob stories you have already heard, but in the end it is called ESSENTIAL Air Service, because

it is essentialto our livelihoods and our economy to have a way to get to larger cities in less time.

Thank you for this consideration,

Tanja Fransen

Glasgow, MT

1
# C_2014112EN.01002801.xml

| 14.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 February 2014 — Pêra-Grave v OHIM — Fundação Eugénio de Almeida (QTA S. JOSÉ DE PERAMANCA)

TA

(Case T-602/11) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark QTA S. JOSÉ DE PERAMANCA - Earlier national figurative marks VINHO PERA-MANCA TINTO, VINHO PERA-MANCA BRANCO and PÊRA-MANCA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

TA

2014/C 112/36

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Pêra-Grave — Sociedade Agrícola, Unipessoal Lda (Evora, Portugal) (represented by: J. de Oliveira Vaz Miranda Sousa, lawyer)

Applicant:

da

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Fundação Eugénio de Almeida (Evora) (represented by: B. Braga da Cruz and J. Pimenta, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 September 2011 (Case R 1797/2010-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Fundação Eugénio de Almeida and Pêra-Grave — Sociedade Agrícola, Unipessoal Lda.

da

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Pêra-Grave — Sociedade Agrícola, Unipessoal Lda to pay the costs, including the costs necessarily incurred by Fundação Eugénio de Almeida for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Pêra-Grave — Sociedade Agrícola, Unipessoal Lda to pay the costs, including the costs necessarily incurred by Fundação Eugénio de Almeida for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

da

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.1



                        Amendment to Employment Agreement

     AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment"), dated as of May 31,
1999, between California Federal Bank, A Federal Savings Bank, (the "Company")
successor by merger to First Nationwide Bank, A Federal Savings Bank, ("FNB")
and Christie S. Flanagan (the "Executive").

     FNB and the Executive entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of
June 1, 1996 (the "Agreement"), which agreement was subsequently assumed by the
Company by operation of law in connection with the merger of FNB with and into
the Company on January 3, 1997.

     The Company and the Executive do hereby wish to extend the term of the
Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment.

     Accordingly, the Company and the Executive hereby agree as follows:

                                   Agreements

     1. Amendment. Paragraph 2.1 of the Agreement is amended in its entirety to
read as follows:

        "2.1 The Term. The term of the Executive's employment under this
        Agreement (the "Term") shall commence June 1, 1996 and shall end on
        July 31, 1999."

     2. No other Amendments. The balance of the provisions of the Agreements
are not altered by this Amendment and remain in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to Employment
Agreement as of the date first above written.

                                        CALIFORNIA FEDERAL BANK
                                        A Federal Savings Bank

                                        /s/ Gerald J. Ford
                                        ----------------------------
                                    By: Gerald J. Ford
                                        Chairman of the Board and
                                        Chief Executive Officer


                                        /s/ Christie S. Flanagan
                                        ----------------------------
                                        Christie S. Flanagan
Household Finance Corporation                                   
Household Consumer Loan Corporation                             
Household Consumer Loan Trust 1996-1                            
*********************************************                   

                                                                
Original Principal Class A                        638,400,000.00
Number of Class A Bonds (000's)                       638,400.00
Original Principal Class B                        136,244,640.00
Number of Class B Bond (000's)                        136,244.64
                                                                
Distribution Date                                 Total 1998
Days                                                            
                                                                
CLASS A                                                         
Principal Distribution                            145,903,977.33
Principal Payment Factor (per 1,000 Bond)          228.546330401
                                                                
Interest Distribution                              17,526,156.76
Interest Payment Factor (per 1,000 Bond)            27.453253073
                                                                
                                                                
CLASS B                                                         
Principal Distribution                                      0.00
Principal Payment Factor (per 1,000 Bond)            0.000000000
                                                                
Interest Distribution                               8,591,996.34
Interest Payment Factor (per 1,000 Bond)            63.063004444
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105
- 2498

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION April 15, 2011 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with Volvo FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer TO: Docket EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2010
- 0162 This memorandum documents a meeting held on Wednesday , March 9 , 201 1 b etween Volvo, EPA, and DOT . The attendees included: Volvo: Tony

Greszler, Joe Schmidt, and Tim Suder EPA: By ron Bunker , Cle Jackson, Angela Cullen , Chuck Moulis, Allen Duncan, and Houshun Zh ang. DOT : Coralie Cooper The discussion focused on the 2011 baseline for manufacturers that choose the alternative engine standard. Specifically , we discussed the po tential for manufacturers to establish an artificially high 2011 baseline standard in order to game the alternative engine standard. Also discussed were approaches to prevent this potential problem, such as in

- use confirmatory testing.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, Criminal No. 15-cr-20106-02 

Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

 

D2, DARRICK ADAMS, 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER ALLOWING LAPTOP INTO PLACE OF DETENTION

 Upon Defendant’s need to view electronic discovery material in the facility 

housing defendant, and the Court being aware of the refusal of detention facilities to 

allow a laptop into their facility without a court order; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that attorney Colleen Fitzharris shall be allowed 

to visit defendant at his place of incarceration and enter the facility with a laptop 

computer for purposes of reviewing discovery material in the above-captioned 

matter. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a private and confidential area shall be 

provided for the inmate visit. 

/s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: October 25, 2021 

Case 2:15-cr-20106-MFL-MKM ECF No. 875, PageID.4160 Filed 10/25/21 Page 1 of 2
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on October 25, 2021, by electronic means and/or ordinary 

mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (810) 341-9764

Case 2:15-cr-20106-MFL-MKM ECF No. 875, PageID.4161 Filed 10/25/21 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2
------------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of Zomex  Distribution,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Peter Buckley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Peter Buckley
-----------------------
Peter Buckley
Chief Financial Officer

November 15, 2004
§ 197.312 Breathing supply hoses. ( a ) Each breathing supply hose must— ( 1 ) Have a maximum working pressure that is equal to or exceeds— ( i ) The maximum working pressure of the section of the breathing supply system in which used; and
( ii ) The pressure equivalent of the maximum depth of the dive relative to the supply source plus 100 psig;
( 2 ) Have a bursting pressure of four times its maximum working pressure;
( 3 ) Have connectors that— ( i ) Are made of corrosion-resistant material;
( ii ) Are resistant to accidental disengagement; and
( iii ) Have a maximum working pressure that is at least equal to the maximum working pressure of the hose to which they are attached; and
( 4 ) Resist kinking by— ( i ) Being made of kink-resistant materials; or
( ii ) Having exterior support.
( b ) Each umbilical must— ( 1 ) Meet the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section; and
( 2 ) Be marked from the diver or open bell end in 10-foot intervals to 100 feet and in 50-foot intervals thereafter.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Dear Randy, John, Mel and Dennis,

Thank you again for taking the time to meet with us on short notice. As we had discussed I am attaching a brief on the issues we found with 6540J (please see FAA 6540 issues.pdf). I hope that we have been able to expand on the topics to include how these issues are against precedent or do not follow FAR's to hopefully make your jobs easier to facilitate a quick resolution.

On the subject of the Me-262. The Sanders Aeronautics crew is awaiting word to come to the local FSDO and MIDO to instruct them to inspect the aircraft. Currently the GVT is complete and they are working on the slats, so it is a good time for the local representatives to schedule a visit if it is still wanted. Please let me know where we stand on the inspection when you get a chance.

I am sure that we all are happy to see that we are getting close to the finish line on this project. 

Thank you again for all of your time, effort and support.

Warmest Regards,

Rob Collings
§ 194.05-11 Flammable solids and oxidizing materials—Detail requirements. ( a ) Flammable solids and oxidizing materials used as chemical stores and reagents are governed by subparts 194.15 and 194.20.
( b ) Oxidizing materials used as blasting agents are regulated by the appropriate portions of 49 CFR parts 172, 173, and 176.
[CGFR 67-83, 33 FR 1151, Jan. 27, 1968, as amended by CGD 86-033, 53 FR 36027, Sept. 16, 1988; 53 FR 46872, Nov. 21, 1988]
----

See Figure 4 for view orientation. There are no visible high-backscatter dredged-material deposits.  Scale across bottom of image is about 5 km.

Top of pageBeginning of OFR 00-124URL: http://geopubs.wr.usgs.gov/open-file/of00-124/fig5.htmlMaintainer: SusanA. CochranLast modified: 12 Dec 2000
U.S. Department of the Interior,U.S.Geological Survey,Western RegionCoastal and Marine Geology
§ 194.10-5 Type and location. ( a ) *Integral magazines.* ( 1 ) Magazines shall be of permanent construction located below the freeboard deck and where practicable below the waterline.
( 2 ) Magazines shall not be located in horizontal proximity to or below accommodation spaces.
( 3 ) Magazines shall not be located adjacent to the collision bulkhead, nor in bearing with a bulkhead forming the boilerroom, engineroom, gallery, or other high fire hazard area boundary. If it is necessary to construct the magazine in proximity to these areas, a cofferdam space of at least 2 feet shall be provided between the bulkhead or deck involved and the magazine. Such a cofferdam shall be provided with suitable ventilation and shall not be used for storage purposes.
( b ) *Magazine vans.* ( 1 ) Magazine vans may be installed on deck in a location protected from boarding seas. The location selected shall not impair access to accommodations or other spaces necessary to the safe working and navigation of the vessel and shall not be within 15 feet of ventilation terminals emitting warm air or hazardous vapors, such as from galleys and pumprooms, or within 10 feet of any unshielded radio apparatus or antenna lead.
( 2 ) Magazine vans may be installed below decks in holds provided the hold location meets the location requirements for integral magazines. The cofferdam requirement of paragraph (a)(3) of this section is considered as fulfilled if the van is of steel construction. Holds so utilized shall not be used for stowage of other hazardous materials covered by 49 CFR parts 171-179. The stowage of other explosives or oxidizing materials in the same hold is permitted in accordance with the requirements of 49 CFR part 176.
( c ) *Magazine chests.* ( 1 ) Magazine chests shall be located on the weather decks in a position suitable for jettisoning the contents.
( 2 ) Magazine chests shall be set off at least 4 inches from decks and deckhouse.
( 3 ) Magazine chests shall not be located within 15 feet of ventilation terminals emitting warm air or hazardous vapors, such as from galleys and pumprooms.
( 4 ) Magazine chests intended for the stowage of blasting caps, detonators, or boosters, in addition to the requirements in this paragraph, shall not be stowed within 10 feet of any unshielded radio apparatus or antenna leads.
[CGFR 67-83, 33 FR 1151, Jan. 27, 1968, as amended by CGD 86-033, 53 FR 36027, Sept. 16, 1988]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on March 8, 2007, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (“IEEE”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, 17 new standards have                           ( print page 25782)                        been initiated and 8 existing standards are being revised. More detail regarding these changes can be found at                     *http://standards.ieee.org/​standardswire/​sba/​02-27-07.html.*

                    On September 17, 2004, IEEE filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 64105).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 9, 2006. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on December 22, 2006 (71 FR 77061).                

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 07-2226 Filed 5-4-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.201-3 Testing, marking, and inspection requirements. ( a ) Fire-resisting materials for high-speed craft that is submitted for type approval must be tested in accordance with Annex 1, Part 10 of the FTP Code (incorporated by reference, see § 164.201-2).
( b ) All testing and inspections required by this subpart must be performed by an independent laboratory accepted by the Coast Guard under subpart 159.010 of this chapter. A list of independent laboratories accepted as meeting subpart 159.010 of this chapter is available online at *http://psix.uscg.mil/EQLabs/Default.aspx*.
( c ) The independent laboratory must perform an initial factory inspection to select the test specimens and establish the materials of construction, chemical make-up, dimensions, tolerances, and other related factors needed to confirm product consistency during follow-up production inspections.
( d ) Production inspections must be performed by the independent laboratory in accordance with subpart 159.007 of this chapter at least annually to confirm that no changes have been made to the product that may adversely affect its fire performance as a fire resisting material for high speed craft.
( e ) The independent laboratory must prepare production inspection procedures and a report of the results of the fire-testing program, and must furnish the manufacturer with three copies of each upon completion of the required testing.
( f ) Materials approved under this subpart must be shipped in packaging that is clearly marked with the name of the manufacturer, product designation, date of manufacture, batch or lot number, and Coast Guard type approval number.