alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the
"Form 10-QSB") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").

     I, Heather D. Brolick, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer,
certify that:

     (i)  the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
          78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

Dated: November 14, 2006


                                        /S/ Heather D. Brolick
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Heather D. Brolick
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


                                      -36-
## Record of Contacts

FDMS Docket No. FAA-2010-0436

With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been di scussed (e.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

TCCA 

### Richard Topham 10/16/09 Concurred.

Bombardier 

### Chester Liburski 10/16/09 Concurred.

RAA Dave Lotterer 

### 10/16/09 Concurred.
EXHIBIT 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY OF EDS DIRECTOR

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned Director
of Electronic Data Systems Corporation, a Delaware corporation, which will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, an Annual Report for 2005 on Form 10-K,
hereby constitutes and appoints Michael H. Jordan, Jeffrey M. Heller, Robert H. Swan and Storrow M. Gordon his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power to act without the others, to execute such Form 10-K and any and all
amendments thereto on behalf of the undersigned in the capacity indicated.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of
Attorney effective as of February 7, 2006.



/S/ W. ROY DUNBARDirector/S/ ROGER A. ENRICODirector/S/ S. MALCOLM GILLISDirector/S/ RAY J. GROVESDirector/S/ ELLEN M. HANCOCKDirector/S/ RAY L. HUNTDirector/S/ EDWARD A. KANGASDirector/S/ R. DAVID YOSTDirector




---

POWER OF ATTORNEY OF EDS DIRECTOR

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned Director of Electronic Data Systems Corporation, a Delaware corporation, which will file with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, an Annual Report for 2005 on Form 10-K, hereby constitutes and appoints Michael H. Jordan, Robert H. Swan and Storrow M.
Gordon his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power to act without the others, to execute such Form 10-K and any and all amendments thereto on behalf of the undersigned in the capacity indicated.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney effective as of February 28, 2006.



/S/ JEFFREY M. HELLERDirector
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOSEPH JONES,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 14-CV-14484

vs. HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

J. WIERMAN and ALFRED JONES,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE

JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [DOC. 30]

This matter is before the court on plaintiff Joseph Jones’s action alleging that

defendants violated his rights while he was incarcerated at the G. Robert Cotton

Correctional Facility in Jackson, Michigan (“JCF”). Plaintiff’s claims arise out of the fact

that he had suffered an injury prior to being incarcerated, had been prescribed certain

medication to manage his pain, and that the JCF medical staff prescribed him Tylenol

as opposed to his desired medication. Plaintiff sued defendant nurse practitioner

Wierman because she determined what medication he received and he sued defendant

Alfred Jones because he denied a grievance appeal that plaintiff submitted regarding

the medication change. Defendants Alfred Jones [doc. 24] and Wierman [doc. 25] each

filed motions for summary judgment. 

This matter is presently before the court on Magistrate Judge Grand’s report and

recommendation addressing defendant Alfred Jones’s motion for summary judgment. 

Magistrate Judge Grand recommends that defendant Jones’s motion for summary

judgment should be granted because plaintiff fails to show that defendant Jones was

-1-

2:14-cv-14484-GCS-DRG Doc # 33 Filed 07/18/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 288
personally involved in the alleged unconstitutional activity - the actual decision by

plaintiff’s medical treaters to deny certain medication in favor of other medication. 

Plaintiff did not file objections to the report and recommendation within the established

time period.1 The court has reviewed the file, record, and magistrate judge's report and

recommendation.

The court agrees with the analysis conducted by the magistrate judge, and

therefore accepts his recommendation that defendant Jones’s motion for summary

judgment be GRANTED.

Dated: July 18, 2016

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

July 18, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also on 

Joseph Jones #139995, 28473 Jahns Rd.

Roseville, MI 48066.

s/Barbara Radke

Deputy Clerk

1

Plaintiff submitted a letter to the court on July 7, 2016 in which he describes the

pain treatment he received after being released from JCF [doc. 32]. This letter might be

construed as a response to Magistrate Judge Grand’s order to show cause in relation to

defendant Wierman’s motion for summary judgment. The letter does not address

the legal issues raised by defendant Jones, and will not be construed by the court as

objections to the report and recommendation relating to Jones’s motion for summary

judgment.

-2-

2:14-cv-14484-GCS-DRG Doc # 33 Filed 07/18/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 289
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending November 5, 2005

|Filer               | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|BUTLER BANCORP, MHC | * 3A1* 3A3    | Application by Butler Bancorp, MHC and Butler Bancorp, Inc., both of Lowell, Massachusetts, to become a mutual bank holding company and a stock bank holding company, respectively, by acquiring Butler Bank, Lowell, Massachusetts, pursuant to section 3(a)(1) and section 3(a)(3) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:10/14/2005
|Newspaper:          | Not available
|Federal Register:   | 10/14/2005   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
**Exhibit10.3.1**

 

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENTTO THE 1999 STOCK PLAN OFUNIVERSAL ACCESS GLOBAL HOLDINGS INC.**

** **

Universal Access Global Holdings Inc. (the“Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue ofDelaware General Corporation Law, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

 

FIRST: That the Corporation’s 1999 Stock Plan (the “Plan”) be, and hereby is,amended by inserting the following as the new last two sentences of paragraph 1of Section 3 of the Plan:

 

Notwithstanding the forgoing,the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Plan in2004 is increased from 500,000 to 1,250,000 shares.  This increase does not modify the number of authorized sharesthat may be issued under the Plan in subsequent years.

 

SECOND: That in accordance with Section 15(a) of the Plan the Board ofDirectors of the Corporation through its Compensation Committee adopted theforegoing amendment at a meeting held on March 15, 2004, and directed thatsuch amendment be submitted to the stockholders of the Corporation entitled tovote thereon for their consideration, approval and adoption thereof.

 

THIRD: That in accordance with Section 15(b) of the Plan the stockholdersof the Corporation entitled to vote thereon approved the foregoing amendment atthe Corporations 2004 annual stockholders meeting held on May 27, 2004.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, beingthe Secretary of the Corporation, for the purpose of amending the Plan inaccordance with the applicable provisions of the Plan, under penalties of perjurydoes hereby declare and certify that this is the act and deed of theCorporation and that the facts stated herein are true, and accordingly hashereunto signed this Amendment to the Plan as of May 27, 2004.

 

 
|   | UNIVERSAL ACCESS GLOBAL HOLDINGS INC. |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |                                  |
|   | By:                                   | /S/ Richard L. Monto |
|   |                                  |   |
|   |                                  | Richard L. Monto, Secretary |

 

----
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**264 KA 10-01364**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
JOSEPH V. COSTANTINO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ROBERT L. KEMP OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DOUGLAS A. GOERSS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Deborah A. Haendiges, J.), rendered March 25, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal contempt in the second degree. It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed ( see People v Griffin , 239 AD2d 936).

Entered: March 25, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2373 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2373

 To amend part B of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to restore 
 payments for home oxygen therapy through the beneficiary's period of 
                             medical need.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2009

   Mr. Price of Georgia (for himself and Mr. Shuler) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
  Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend part B of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to restore 
 payments for home oxygen therapy through the beneficiary's period of 
                             medical need.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Home Oxygen Patient Protection Act 
of 2009''.

SEC. 2. RESTORING OXYGEN EQUIPMENT RENTAL PAYMENT UNDER MEDICARE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1834(a)(5) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395m(a)(5)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``(E), and (F)'' and 
        inserting ``and (E)''; and
            (2) by striking subparagraph (F).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall 
apply to individuals receiving oxygen equipment before, on, or after 
December 31, 2005.
                                 <all>
```
§ 179.320 Watertight bulkheads. ( a ) Each watertight bulkhead must be of sufficient strength to be capable of remaining watertight with a head of water to the top of the bulkhead.
( b ) Each watertight bulkhead must extend to the bulkhead deck and be installed in one plane without steps or recesses insofar as is reasonable and practicable. Any steps or recesses permitted must comply with the applicable subdivision requirements in this subchapter.
( c ) The number of penetrations in a watertight bulkhead must be minimized. A penetration in a watertight bulkhead must be as high and as far inboard in the bulkhead as practicable, and made watertight.
( d ) Sluice valves are not permitted in watertight bulkheads.
# C_2012258EN.01001902.xml

| 25.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2012 — Wall v OHIM — Bluepod Media Worldwide (bluepod MEDIA)

(Case T-227/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark bluepod MEDIA - Earlier Community figurative mark blue spot and earlier international and national word marks BlueSpot - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 258/34

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Wall AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: A. Nordemann and T. Boddien, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Bluepod Media Worldwide Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 February 2011 (Case R 301/2010-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Wall AG and Bluepod Media Worldwide Ltd

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Wall AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Wall AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 194, 2.7.2011.

1

---
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7210

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. SHAPAT AHDAWAN NABAYA, a/k/a Norman Abbott , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. M. Hannah Lauck , District Judge. ( 3:17

- cr
- 00003

- MHL

- 1 )

Submitted : January 19, 2021 Decided: January 22, 2021

Before AGEE, WYNN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya was convicted of retaliating against a federal officer by false claim and making a false statement in bankruptcy , and the district court sentenced him to 71 months’ imprisonment. In March 2019, we affirmed Nabaya’s criminal judgment on direct appeal. United States v. Nabaya , 765 F. App’x 895, 902 (4th Cir. 2019) (No. 18

- 4134). Nabay a has now filed a second notice of appeal of the same criminal judgment. Because we previously affirmed this criminal judgment, we dismiss the appeal as duplicative. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pr esented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.105-3 Testing, marking, and inspection requirements. ( a ) Each deck assembly submitted for type approval must be tested for non-combustibility under Annex 1, Part 1 and then tested for fire resistance under Annex 1, Part 3 of the FTP Code (incorporated by reference, see § 164.105-2).
( b ) All testing and inspections required by this subpart must be performed by an independent laboratory accepted by the Coast Guard under subpart 159.010 of this chapter. A list of independent laboratories accepted as meeting subpart 159.010 of this chapter is available online at *http://psix.uscg.mil/EQLabs/Default.aspx*.
( c ) The independent laboratory must perform an initial factory inspection to select the test specimens and establish the materials of construction, chemical make-up, dimensions, tolerances, and other related factors needed to confirm product consistency during follow-up production inspections.
( d ) Production inspections must be performed by the independent laboratory in accordance with subpart 159.007 of this chapter at least annually to confirm that no changes have been made to the product that may adversely affect its fire performance as a deck assembly.
( e ) The independent laboratory must prepare production inspection procedures and a report of the results of the fire testing program, and must furnish the manufacturer with three copies of each upon completion of the required testing.
( f ) Materials approved under this subpart must be shipped in packaging that is clearly marked with the name of the manufacturer, product designation, date of manufacture, batch or lot number, and Coast Guard type approval number.
EXHIBIT 13.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Portrush Petroleum Corporation, a company organized under the British Columbia Corporations Act (the Company) on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Martin P. Cotter, President/CEO/Director of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or

15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and result of operations

of the Company.



/s/ Martin P. Cotter

Martin P. Cotter, President/CEO/CFO/Director





Date: July 7, 2005
<PAGE>

                           CENTRAL FEDERAL CORPORATION
                                  Exhibit 32.1
                           Section 1350 Certifications

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Central Federal Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Mark S. Allio, Vice Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Therese Ann Liutkus, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: August 15, 2005                      By: /s/ Mark S. Allio
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Mark S. Allio
                                                Vice Chairman of the Board,
                                                President and Chief Executive
                                                Officer

Dated: August 15, 2005                      By: /s/ Therese Ann Liutkus
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Therese Ann Liutkus, CPA
                                                Treasurer and Chief Financial
                                                Officer

                                                                             32.
§ 184.220 Cooking equipment. ( a ) Doors on a cooking appliance must be provided with hinges and locking devices to prevent accidental opening in heavy seas.
( b ) A cooking appliance must be installed to prevent movement in heavy seas.
( c ) For a grill or similar type of cooking appliance, means must be provided to collect grease or fat and to prevent its spillage on wiring or the deck.
( d ) Grab rails must be installed on a cooking appliance when determined by the cognizant OCMI to be necessary for safety.
( e ) Sea rails, with suitable barriers to prevent accidental movement of cooking pots, must be installed on a cooking range.
( f ) Electric connections for a cooking appliance must be dripproof.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 1002, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51358, Sept. 30, 1997]
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

DATE & TIME: THURSDAY, APRIL 20, 2017 AT 10:00 A.M. 

PLACE: 999 E STREET, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. (NINTH FLOOR)

STATUS: THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Colorado Republican 

Committee (CRC) (A13-12)

Draft Advisory Opinion 2016-23: Socialist Workers Party

Management and Administrative Matters

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language 

interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Dayna C. Brown,

Secretary and Clerk, at (202)694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Signed: _____________________________________

Dayna C. Brown

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission

Submitted: April 13, 2017
#### Arnold T. Niver, *Respondent, v.*Melville M. Crane, and Ellie M. Crane, *Appellan*ts.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.