alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008019EN.01001201.xml

| 25.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/12 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------- |

---

Summary of Community decisions on marketing authorizations in respect of medicinal products from 1 December 2007 to 31 December 2007

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
( 1 )
or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
( 2 )
)

(2008/C 19/05)

—   Issuing, maintenance or modification of a national marketing authorisation

| Date of the decision | Name(s) of the medicinal product | Holder(s) of the marketing authorization | Member State concerned | Date of notification |
| ------------------------- | -------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------- | ----------------------- |
| 18.12.2007 | Tracleer | Actelion Registration Ltd BSI Building 13th Floor 389 Chiswick High Road London W4 4AL United Kingdom | Actelion Registration Ltd | BSI Building 13th Floor |
| Actelion Registration Ltd | | | | |
| BSI Building 13th Floor | | | | |
| 389 Chiswick High Road | | | | |
| London W4 4AL | | | | |
| United Kingdom | | | | |
| 18.12.2007 | Silapo | STADA Arzneimittel AG Stadastraße 2-18 D-61118 Bad Vilbel | STADA Arzneimittel AG | Stadastraße 2-18 |
| STADA Arzneimittel AG | | | | |
| Stadastraße 2-18 | | | | |
| D-61118 Bad Vilbel | | | | |
| 18.12.2007 | Retacrit | HOSPIRA Enterprises B.V. Taurusavenue 19-21b 2132 LS Hoofddorp Nederland | HOSPIRA Enterprises B.V. | Taurusavenue 19-21b |
| HOSPIRA Enterprises B.V. | | | | |
| Taurusavenue 19-21b | | | | |
| 2132 LS Hoofddorp | | | | |
| Nederland | | | | |
| 19.12.2007 | MabCampath | Genzyme Europe B.V. Gooimeer 10 1411 DD Naarden Nederland | Genzyme Europe B.V. | Gooimeer 10 |
| Genzyme Europe B.V. | | | | |
| Gooimeer 10 | | | | |
| 1411 DD Naarden | | | | |
| Nederland | | | | |

---

( 1 )  OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p. 67.

( 2 )  OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p. 1.

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TRAVIUS M. CATO,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3411 

[February 14, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Laura Johnson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2016-CF-010119-

AXXX-WB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Brad R. Schlesinger, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allan R. Geesey, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
    We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8, No. 33-48833) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan, 1996 Non-Employee
Directors' Stock Option Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan, of our report
dated January 12, 1997, with respect to the financial statements included in
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.
 
    Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of FemRx, Inc.
listed in item 14(a)2. This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.
 
                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Palo Alto, California
March 21, 1997
 
                                       44
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 65 (Thursday, April 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 16762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1670]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee will hold a 
meeting on April 12, 2007 at the U.S. Forest Service Office, 35 College 
Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA, 96150. This Committee, established by the 
Secretary of Agriculture on December 15, 1998 (64 FR 2876), is 
chartered to provide advice to the Secretary on implementing the terms 
of the Federal Interagency Partnership on the Lake Tahoe Region and 
other matters raised by the Secretary.

DATES: The meeting will be held April 12, 2007, beginning at 1 p.m. and 
ending at 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the U.S. Forest Service Office, 
35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA, 96150.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arla Hains, Lake Tahoe Basin 
Management Unit, Forest Service, 35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 
96150, (530) 543-2773.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Items to be covered on the agenda include: 
(1) A public hearing on the Lake Tahoe Federal Advisory Committees' 
Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act Round 8 project 
recommendations; and, (2) the Lake Tahoe Federal Advisory Committee 
Communications Plan. All Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee 
meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens are encouraged to 
attend at the above address. Issues may be brought to the attention of 
the Committee during the open public comment period at the meeting or 
by filing written statements with the secretary for the Committee 
before or after the meeting. Please refer any written comments to the 
Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit at the contact address stated above.

    Dated: March 29, 2007.
Terri Marceron,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 07-1670 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### ANNA B. MALONE ET AL., RELATORS, v. MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF JERSEY CITY ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

Decided November *4,*1929.

*956Before Gummere, Chief Justice, and Justice Parker.

Eor the relators, *Marie A. Sullivan.*

Eor the respondents, *Frank J. Reardon*and *Mark Town*send, *Jr.*

Per Curiam.

The relators, Anna B. Malone and Harry Goldowsky, by this proceeding seek to compel the municipality of Jersey City to issue to Goldowsky a permit for the erection of a forty-six family brick apartment house upon a plot of ground located on Jewett avenue, Jersey City, of which Mrs. Malone is the owner. The two relators entered into a contract for the sale of this plot of ground by Mrs. Malone to Goldowsky, and the latter subsequent to the execution of the contract applied for the permit to erect the apartment house. The application was denied upon the ground that a large majority of the property owners in the neighborhood had protested against the erection of such a building. The relators thereupon applied for and were allowed an alternative writ of *mandamus*to review the validity of this municipal action.

In our opinion the refusal to grant the permit was proper even if the reason upon which such refusal was based was not sound. As has already been stated, the applicant for the permit was not the owner of the land, but merely held a contract for its purchase. Normally no one but the owner or a person authorized by him to do so has a right to erect a building upon a plot of ground owned by the former. No such right vests in a person holding a contract for the purchase of the tract. He may default in the performance of his con*957tract. So, too, the owner may for good cause refuse to perform it on his part. In order to entitle an applicant to the granting of a permit to erect a building upon the land of another, it is necessary for him to show that he had a present right to erect such a building on that land. This case is barren of any proof that such a right was conferred upon Goldowsky by Mrs. Malone; and such fundamental fact not having been shsown to exist, the refusal to grant the permit was proper.

The defendants are entitled to judgment upon the demurrer to their return.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 17942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1774]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Notice of Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Thursday, April 12, 2007.

Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

Status: Open.

Matters to be Considered: 
    1. Quarterly Insurance Fund Report.
    2. Proposed Rule: Part 708b of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, 
Disclosure of Merger Related Compensation.
    3. Proposed Rule: Section 701.3 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, 
Member Inspection of Credit Union Books, Records, and Minutes.

Recess: 11:15 a.m.

Time and Date: 11:30 a.m., Thursday, April 12, 2007.

Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: 
    1. One (1) Administrative Action under Section 206 of the Federal 
Credit Union Act. Closed pursuant to Exemptions (8), (9)(A)(ii), and 
(B).
    2. Part 703 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Pilot Program Request. 
Closed pursuant to Exemptions (4) and (8).
    3. One (1) Personnel Matter. Closed pursuant to Exemptions (2) and 
(6).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 07-1774 Filed 4-5-07; 4:07 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-M
§ 190.25-10 Storm rails. ( a ) On vessels in ocean and coastwise service, suitable storm rails shall be installed in all passageways and at the deckhouse sides where persons on board might have normal access. Storm rails shall be installed on both sides of passageways which are 6 feet or more in width.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

December 26, 2012

h1217

Order 

December 26, 2012

145438

ROBERT A. KRUEGER and PHYLLIS

G. KRUEGER,

Petitioners-Appellees,

v SC: 145438

COA: 302246

MTT: 00-342850

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,

Respondent-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 29, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                     5
       
<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                  DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                        4,118,031
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 139,190
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  35,000
<INVENTORY>                                                   43,868
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              4,307,222
<PP&E>                                                        1,111,327
<DEPRECIATION>                                                500,232
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                5,161,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         678,706
<BONDS>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                      6,344
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   265
<OTHER-SE>                                                    4,411,619
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  5,161,964
<SALES>                                                       2,370,318
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              2,746,029
<CGS>                                                         1,380,670
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 6,289,095
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              4,867,933
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            40,492
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (3,543,066)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (3,543,066)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 (3.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (3.33)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2011252EN.01001802.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/18

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands), lodged on 9 June 2011 — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v TNT Freight Management (Amsterdam) BV

(Case C-291/11)

2011/C 252/33

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Appellant:

Respondent: TNT Freight Management (Amsterdam) BV

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Should Note 1(g) to Chapter 30 of the Harmonised System, read in conjunction with Note 1(b) to Chapter 35 of the Harmonised System, be interpreted as meaning that blood albumin, which itself has no therapeutic or prophylactic effect but which has been produced with a view to, and is essential for, the preparation of products which do have a therapeutic or prophylactic effect, and which by its nature can be used only for that purpose, has been prepared for therapeutic or prophylactic uses within the meaning of that note?

---
# C_2013038EN.01002401.xml

| 9.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/24

---

Order of the General Court of 11 December 2012 — Atlas Transport v OHIM — Hartmann (ATLAS TRANSPORT)

(Case T-584/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for revocation - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 38/42

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Atlas Transport GmbH (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: U. Hildebrandt, K. Schmidt-Hern and B. Weichhaus, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Alfred Hartmann (Leer, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 September 2011 (Case R 2262/2010-1), relating to revocation proceedings between Mr Alfred Hartmann and Atlas Transport GmbH.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no further need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The parties are to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The parties are to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.

1

---
UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

SOUTHWEST METALS, INC., a Michigan

corporation, and JOSEPH FAWAZ, an

individual,

Plaintiffs, 

v.

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHAEL E.

DUGGAN, Mayor of Detroit, in his official

capacity, DETROIT POLICE

DEPARTMENT, JAMES CRAIG, Detroit

Police Chief, in his official capacity, SGT.

REBECCA McKAY, in her individual and

official capacities, KEVIN JONES, City of

Detroit Business License Center Manager,

in his official capacity, and CITY OF

DETROIT BUSINESS LICENSE CENTER,

jointly and severally,

Defendants.

_______________________ __________/

CASE NO. 2:15-cv-11080

HON. MARIANNE O. BATTANI

SCHEDULING ORDER 

On April 29, 2015, the Court heard oral argument on and considered Plaintiffs’

Supplement to Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. 19) disputing

their right to continue operating as a business. The parties are to file dispositive

motions within 14 days of the conclusion of the administrative hearings related to

Plaintiffs’ business license, but no later than July 1, 2015. The Court will file a notice of

hearing along with a briefing schedule at that point. Thereafter, trial is tentatively set for

September 15, 2015. To the extent that the current order interferes with the order

entered on April 16, 2015, to stay all further proceedings, the April 16 order is vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 22, PageID.523 Filed 05/21/15 Page 1 of 2
Date: May 21, 2015 s/Marianne O. Battani 

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's ECF System to their

respective email addresses or First Class U.S. mail to the non-ECF participants on May 21, 2015.

s/ Kay Doaks 

Case Manager

2

Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 22, PageID.524 Filed 05/21/15 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE KATZ
DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS PRESENTED IN THE COMPANY'S
FORM 10-KSB FOR THE ANNUAL PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       3,428,175
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,216,386
<ALLOWANCES>                                    94,738
<INVENTORY>                                     69,328
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,877,403
<PP&E>                                       3,568,853
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,667,408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,379,346
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,425
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,071,536
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,667,408
<SALES>                                     15,565,919
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,565,919
<CGS>                                        7,997,418
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,425,896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               332,179
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              67,421
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                743,005
<INCOME-TAX>                                   940,181<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (197,176)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (197,176)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>THE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES INCLUDES A ONE-TIME CHARGE OF $660,000 RELATING
TO ADDITIONAL FEDERAL AND STATE INCOME TAXES APPLICABLE TO TEMPORARY DIFFERENCES
IN THE RECOGNITION OF INCOME AND EXPENSES FOR FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING AND INCOME
TAX REPORTING AT MARCH 26, 1996.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
## MAY 

## f 

## 4 Z01Z

Ms. Sara KendaH Chairwoman. National Advisory Coundl for Environmental Polil:y

and Technology \Vork-Force Issues \Vorkgroup Vice President. Corporate Atfairs and Sustainability \Veycrhacuscr Company P.O. Box 9777. MS CH3 J26 Federal**\\'ay~** \Vashingtun 98063-9777

Dear Ms. Kendall:

Ioiler my sincerest appreciation to you and your colleagues on**th~** National Advisory Council tor Environmental Policy and Technology f(.lf your substantial time and effort in addressing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's charge to assist with 'vork-forcc planning. leadership**development~** diversity and talent management. The council developed four advice letters containing more than 30 recommendations on critical**issues~** including the scientific and technical competencies necessary to meet tomorrow's challenges: strategies to obtain and retain scientitic and technical**expertise~** and recommendations ftlrattracting. retaining and building the superiorexecuth·c leadership talent needed torOne EPA and beyond.

Iasked NACEPT to 

### \Vork on this charge because I\Vantcd your external pcrspecth·e on these challenging and important issues. The productsrepresent thoughtful and well-researched advice by council members who have a key stake in our success.

Indeed, your advice is already having an impact on our work. The EPA has integrated several ofyour work-force planning recommendations into its work-force planning processes, critical occupations and competencies. The EPA is building the infrastntcture and systems necessary to promote collaboration. partncring and knowledge sharing in support ofOne EPA. In**addition~** the agency has begun to implement the council's recommendations on diversity and inclusion. On March 16,**2012~** the EPA submitted its DiversityandInclusion Strategic Plan to the Office ofPersonnel Management for approval. I have every confidence that the agency's work in this area will be strongeras a result ofthis plan and your related recommendations.

The EPA is currently analyzing your other recommendations. Your thoughtful adYice is spurring us to re-examine some ofourpriorities and to reconsider some ofour fiscal choicesto ensurethat ourwork lon:e will be successful now and 

### in the future. Should you have any questions orneed additional**infonnation~** please contact Craig E. Hooks. assistant administrator for the Office ofAdministration and Resources !V1anagement, at (202) 564-4606 or hooks.craigti!cpa.gnv.Thank you once again for your hard work and valuable contributions. Ultimald). your dTorts \vill st:rve to strengthen the EPA·s work force. leading to improved humanhealth, environmental protection and sustainability ofthe agent:)·sdTorts. \Ve will keep you apprised ofourprogress as we continue to \\Ork with NACEPT on other charges and challenges.