alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 32.1


    Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of ComBanc, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Jason R. Thornell, VP/Controller of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

                         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                             section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                             Act of 1934, as amended; and

                         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
                             presents, in all material respects, the financial
                             condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Jason R. Thornell
--------------------------------
Jason R. Thornell, VP/Controller

October 27, 2004

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the
extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2011130EN.01002202.xml

| 30.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/22

---

Action brought on 11 March 2011 — Ahouma v Council

(Case T-138/11)

2011/C 130/43

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Brouha Nathanaël Ahouma (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) (represented by: G. Collard, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, concerning the applicant, Mr Brouha Nathanaël AHOUMA, Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011, published on 15 January 2011 in the Official Journal of the European Union, are not justified in fact, |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, concerning the applicant, Mr Brouha Nathanaël AHOUMA, Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011, published on 15 January 2011 in the Official Journal of the European Union, are not justified in fact,

| — | consequently,






  — | annul Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

consequently,

—

annul Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011;

| — | alternatively, order that the name of Mr Brouha Nathanaël AHOUMA be removed from the lists annexed to that regulation and to that decision. |
| --- | --- |

—

alternatively, order that the name of Mr Brouha Nathanaël AHOUMA be removed from the lists annexed to that regulation and to that decision.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments raised by the applicant are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-137/11 Guiai Bi Poin v Council.

Guiai Bi Poin

Council

---
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-14, PageID.426 Filed 04/07/15 Page 1 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-14, PageID.427 Filed 04/07/15 Page 2 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-14, PageID.428 Filed 04/07/15 Page 3 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-14, PageID.429 Filed 04/07/15 Page 4 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-14, PageID.430 Filed 04/07/15 Page 5 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-14, PageID.431 Filed 04/07/15 Page 6 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-14, PageID.432 Filed 04/07/15 Page 7 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-14, PageID.433 Filed 04/07/15 Page 8 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-14, PageID.434 Filed 04/07/15 Page 9 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-14, PageID.435 Filed 04/07/15 Page 10 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-14, PageID.436 Filed 04/07/15 Page 11 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-14, PageID.437 Filed 04/07/15 Page 12 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-14, PageID.438 Filed 04/07/15 Page 13 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-14, PageID.439 Filed 04/07/15 Page 14 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-14, PageID.440 Filed 04/07/15 Page 15 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-14, PageID.441 Filed 04/07/15 Page 16 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-14, PageID.442 Filed 04/07/15 Page 17 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-14, PageID.443 Filed 04/07/15 Page 18 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-14, PageID.444 Filed 04/07/15 Page 19 of 19
Exhibit 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of RedHand International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Simon P. Thurlow as President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                                By /s/ Simon P. Thurlow
                                                   --------------------
                                                Simon P. Thurlow, President

November 24, 2004
§ 185.315 Verification of vessel compliance with applicable stability requirements. ( a ) After loading and prior to departure and at all other times necessary to assure the safety of the vessel, the master shall determine that the vessel complies with all applicable stability requirements in the vessel's trim and stability book, stability letter, Certificate of Inspection, and Load Line Certificate, as the case may be. The vessel may not depart until it is in compliance with these requirements.
( b ) In order to fulfill the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section and avoid overloading the vessel, the master must take into account the total weight of passengers, crew, and variable loads.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 1005, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by USCG-2007-0030, 75 FR 78092, Dec. 14, 2010]
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

ALEX H. GOMEZ, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-4987 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed February 2, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Thomas Krug, Judge. Michael Gonzalez and Henry Gonzalez of Law Office of Michael Gonzalez, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
CASANUEVA, KELLY, and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 21



GENSYM CORPORATION



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT





|                                 |  |                              
|-------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Name                             |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|                                 | 
|Gensym International Corporation |  | Delaware                     
|                                 | 
|Gensym Securities Corporation    |  | Massachusetts                
|                                 | 
|Gensym Holding Company           |  | Delaware                     
|                                 | 
|Gensym B.V.                      |  | The Netherlands              
|                                 | 
|Gensym GmbH                      |  | Germany                      
|                                 | 
|Gensym S.A.                      |  | France                       
|                                 | 
|Gensym Ltd.                      |  | United Kingdom               
|                                 | 
|Gensym Srl.                      |  | Italy                        
|                                 | 
|Gensym MENA                      |  | Tunisia                      
|                                 | 
|Gensym AB                        |  | Sweden                       
|                                 | 
|Gensym Japan Corporation         |  | Japan
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Mike L. Wilhelms, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Triad FinancialCorporation, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Triad Financial Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:   a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;   b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   c. Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the company’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/ Mike L. Wilhelms Mike L. WilhelmsSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDated: May 12, 2006
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3400

_____________________________

DESHAWN GREEN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Jack M. Schemer, Judge.

May 2, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, WINOKUR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Deshawn Green, pro se, Appellant.
2

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Daniel R. Krumbholz, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sanders Morris Harris GroupInc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003(the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof, I, Ben T. Morris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.  The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  BEN  T. MORRIS |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| Ben T.  Morris                |
| Chief  Executive Officer      |

 

 

November 12,2003

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. and willbe retained by Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RITA NILEWONYAN FARYEN,

Plaintiff, No. 14-CV-14664-DT

vs. Hon. Gerald E. Rosen

UNITED MACHINING, INC.,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

At a session of said Court, held in

 the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan

on September 19, 2016

PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen

 United States District Judge

This pro se employment discrimination matter having come before the Court on the

August 16, 2016 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie

Dawkins Davis recommending that the Court grant the Motion for Summary Judgment filed

byDefendant United Machining, Inc. (“UMI”) in February 2016; and Plaintiff having timely

filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and Defendant UMI having responded;

and the Court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation,

Plaintiff’s Objections, Defendant’s Response, and the Court’s entire file of this action, and

having concluded that, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation,

Defendant’s motion should be granted and this case should, accordingly be dismissed in its

2:14-cv-14664-GER-SDD Doc # 54 Filed 09/19/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1145
entirety,

NOW,THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation of August 16, 2016 [Dkt. # 51] be, and hereby is, adopted by this

Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s

Report and Recommendation, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. # 39, 41]

hereby is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Motion against defendant Discovery

Document” [Dkt. # 40] and “Motion to Amend Against Defendant Discovery” [Dkt. # 44]

are DENIED as MOOT.

Accordingly,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint be, and hereby is,

DISMISSED in its entirety, with prejudice.

s/Gerald E. Rosen 

United States District Judge

Dated: September 19, 2016

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or

counsel of record on September 19, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Julie Owens 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5135

2:14-cv-14664-GER-SDD Doc # 54 Filed 09/19/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1146
Exhibit 4 

2:14-cv-11700-PDB-MJH Doc # 1-5 Filed 04/29/14 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 108
2:14-cv-11700-PDB-MJH Doc # 1-5 Filed 04/29/14 Pg 2 of 9 Pg ID 109
2:14-cv-11700-PDB-MJH Doc # 1-5 Filed 04/29/14 Pg 3 of 9 Pg ID 110
2:14-cv-11700-PDB-MJH Doc # 1-5 Filed 04/29/14 Pg 4 of 9 Pg ID 111
2:14-cv-11700-PDB-MJH Doc # 1-5 Filed 04/29/14 Pg 5 of 9 Pg ID 112
2:14-cv-11700-PDB-MJH Doc # 1-5 Filed 04/29/14 Pg 6 of 9 Pg ID 113
2:14-cv-11700-PDB-MJH Doc # 1-5 Filed 04/29/14 Pg 7 of 9 Pg ID 114
2:14-cv-11700-PDB-MJH Doc # 1-5 Filed 04/29/14 Pg 8 of 9 Pg ID 115
2:14-cv-11700-PDB-MJH Doc # 1-5 Filed 04/29/14 Pg 9 of 9 Pg ID 116
Page 1 of 4

Request for amendment to FAA Exemption 333

Exemption No. 14220 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-4895 

Contact: 

Richard Tulloch 

President 

Yovem LLC 

623.205.0712 

www.yovem.com

LLC
Page 2 of 4

To whom it may concern: 

Date: 01/24/16 

Re: Exemption No. 14220 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-4895 

Yovem LLC is requesting amendments to their exemption 333 as listed and described below. The 

purpose for the amendments is to be able to offer additional services that will allow Yovem LLC to be 

competitive as company. Each amendment will serve to increase the efficiency and functionality a 

company needs to grow. 

1. Addition Aircraft 

Yovem LLC would like to add an additional UASs to the existing exemption. The new crafts are the 

DJI’s Inspire series. 

Manufacturer: DJI 

• This additional aircrafts meets all weight, speed and other criteria spelled out in exemption No.

14220. 

• The DJI Inspire series allows the operator to remove and upgrade the camera per the manufacturer. 

• The DJI Inspire series will only be use for operations listed in Exemption No. 14220 or any 

approved operations in this amendment. 

• All DJI Inspire documents and manuals will be attached and send with this amendment. 

2. Additional Operations Using UASs 

Yovem LLC would like to add additional operations using UAS to our existing exemption. 

Additional operations would include conducting aerial photography and videography using approved 

unmanned aircraft system (UAS) for. 

• Agriculture 

 A. Crop Monitoring 

 B. Live Stock Monitoring 

• Inspections 

 A. Roof Inspections 

 B. Solar Panel Inspections 

 C. Civil Infrastructures Inspections 
Page 3 of 4

 D. Electrical Infrastructures Inspections 

 E. Terrain Inspections 

 F. Real Estate and Commercial Properties 

• Construction 

 A. Construction Planning 

 B. Construction Progress Monitoring 

 C. Job Site Monitoring 

 D. Surveying 

 E. Aerial Mapping 

• Appraisals 

 A. Insurance Appraisals 

 B.Insurance Claims 

 C. Real Estate Appraisal 

 D. Property And Land Appraisals 

• Media 

 A. Traffic Watch 

 B. Journalism 

• Disaster Relief 

• Security 

 A. Large Commercial Buildings 

 B. Factors 

 C. Power plants 

• Weddings 

• Events 
Page 4 of 4

3. Relief from limitation No. 6 Visual Observer (VO) requirement. 

Yovem LLC request the removal of the Visual Observer (VO) requirements when operating in rural 

areas or ares not congested by people or buildings. Certain jobs such as surveying, aerial mapping and 

even farming can be conducted safely without a visual observer. Removal of this particular limitation 

will help Yovem LLC be more competitive by reducing cost and transferring that extra savings to our 

customers. 

Sincerely, 

Richard Tulloch 

CEO 

Yovem LLC 

3
<PAGE>   1

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1

                                     TO THE

                        LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS LTD.

                             2000 STOCK OPTION PLAN



         This Amendment No. 1 (the "Amendment") to the Loral Space &
Communications Ltd. 2000 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") is made effective as of
this 29th day of November, 2000.

         Pursuant to resolutions of the Executive Committee of the Board of
Directors of Loral Space & Communications Ltd. (the "Company") dated November
29, 2000, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

         1.       Section 3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended by increasing to
22,000,000 the number of shares of the Company's Common Stock, par value $0.01
per share, reserved for issuance under the Plan.

         Except as expressly provided herein, the terms and conditions of the
Plan shall remain unchanged.




                                LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS LTD.



                                By:  /s/ Avi Katz
                                      Name:  Avi Katz
                                      Title:    Vice President, General Counsel
                                                and Secretary
#### Emerson Day, *as Commissioner, etc., of Town of Royalton, Appellant, v.*Fayette Day, *as Commissioner, etc., of Town of Hartland,*Respondent.

Leave granted to appeal to the Court of Appeals on the ground that the case involves a question of law which ought to be reviewed by that court.
# C_2008216EN.01001601.xml

| 23.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 216/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/16

---

Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 27 Member States applicable as from 1 September 2008

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1))

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1))

(2008/C 216/06)

Base rates calculated in accordance with the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6). Depending on the use of the reference rate, the appropriate margins have still to be added as defined in this Communication. For the discount rate this means that a margin of 100 basis points has to be added. The Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 of 30 January 2008 amending the implementing Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 foresees that, unless otherwise provided for in a specific decision, the recovery rate will also be calculated by adding 100 basis points to the base rate.

| From | To | AT | BE | BG | CY | CZ | DE | DK | EE | EL | ES | FI | FR | HU | IE | IT | LT | LU | LV | MT | NL | PL | PT | RO | SE | SI | SK | UK |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.9.2008 | ... | 4,59 | 4,59 | 6,70 | 4,59 | 4,20 | 4,59 | 5,55 | 6,43 | 4,59 | 4,59 | 4,59 | 4,59 | 8,58 | 4,59 | 4,59 | 6,10 | 4,59 | 9,44 | 4,59 | 4,59 | 6,42 | 4,59 | 11,02 | 5,49 | 4,59 | 4,34 | 5,66 |
| 1.7.2008 | 31.8.2008 | 4,59 | 4,59 | 6,70 | 4,59 | 4,20 | 4,59 | 4,81 | 6,43 | 4,59 | 4,59 | 4,59 | 4,59 | 8,58 | 4,59 | 4,59 | 6,10 | 4,59 | 9,44 | 4,59 | 4,59 | 6,42 | 4,59 | 11,02 | 4,75 | 4,59 | 4,34 | 5,66 |

From

To

AT

BE

BG

CY

CZ

DE

DK

EE

EL

ES

FI

FR

HU

IE

IT

LT

LU

LV

MT

NL

PL

PT

RO

SE

SI

SK

UK

1.9.2008

...

4,59

4,59

6,70

4,59

4,20

4,59

5,55

6,43

4,59

4,59

4,59

4,59

8,58

4,59

4,59

6,10

4,59

9,44

4,59

4,59

6,42

4,59

11,02

5,49

4,59

4,34

5,66

1.7.2008

31.8.2008

4,59

4,59

6,70

4,59

4,20

4,59

4,81

6,43

4,59

4,59

4,59

4,59

8,58

4,59

4,59

6,10

4,59

9,44

4,59

4,59

6,42

4,59

11,02

4,75

4,59

4,34

5,66

---