alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
• 1

' . I ^""v l Buildin g Sustainabl e Brand s an d Businesse s 

# IIASPIH E

INTElllSENC i

Marc h 5 , 201 0 Th e Honorabl e Ra

yLaHoo d ^ i Secretar yr- ^ Unite d State s Departmen t o fTransportatio n v: | 120 0 NewJerse

yAvenue , S

E Washington , D.C . 2059 0 ^^^ S Subject : Haned a Combinatio n Service s Allocatio n Proceedin g DOT-OST-2010-001&.

_S Dea rSecretar

yLaHood : A s a dedicate d trave l partne ro fAmerica n Airlines , I a m writin g i n support o fAmerican' s applicatio n t o provid e ne wservic e fro m NewYork' s Joh n F . Kenned yInternationa l Airpor t an d Lo s Angele s Internationa l Airpor t t o Toky o Internationa l Airpor t a t Haneda . I recogniz e an d applau d yo u an d th e Obam a administratio n fo ryour : uccess las t Decembe r i n reachin g a landmar k

Ope n Skit s agreemen t wit h Japan , whic h open s c p Haned a t o servic e b yU.S . airlines . I encourag e you rselectio n o fAmerica n Airline s t o provid e nonsto p servic e fro m NewYor k an d Lo s Angele s t o Haned a i n orde rt o provid e a n essentia l connectio n betwee n thre e o fth e vvorli! ' financis ! ?n d commerc e centers . Recen: : events , includ . ; g th e successfu l preservatio n o fJapa n Airlines ' oneworl d Allianc e membership , K.^v

e underscore d American' s stron g commitmen t t o th e trans-Pacifi cmarkst . Amerira n i s likewis e committe d t o NewYor k an d Lo s Angle s - bot h vita l foca l point s o f business , trade , entertainment , technolog yan d educatio n - providin g unsurpasse d ai r servic e since th e mid-1900 s 3ot h th e NewYor k

anr O to s Angele s metr o area s wil l gai n significan t economi cbenefit s fro m thes e propose d ne wriights , a s wil l American' s customers an d employees . However , w e nee d you rhel p t o make th e JFK/Haned a connectio n a reality . Therefore , i Sirongl yurg e yo u t o sa yYE S t o America n Airline s an d it s reques t fo rslot s t o fl y fro m Ken.ied yt o HaiiL-da ! ' Sincerely ,

NatsiSv^W . LipsCt ; I . • •

ASPIR E Intelligenc e LL C ' 75 0 Thir d Avenu e #94 1 NewYork , N Y1001 7 Phone : 212-527-754 0 •Fax ; 212-504-819 2 •E-mail : info@aspireintelligence.co m

'iS;=' ' •V.- , •, / r*. .
#### § 167.45-25 Fire mains and hose connections.

All pipes used as mains for conducting water from fire pumps on nautical school ships shall be of steel, wrought iron, brass, or copper with wrought iron brass, or composition hose connections.
§ 147A.25 Entry. ( a ) No person may enter the spaces that immediately adjoin the space that is fumigated during fumigation unless entry is for emergency purposes or the space is tested and declared safe for human occupancy by a marine chemist or other qualified person and is inspected under § 147A.21(a)(2) or § 147A.23(d).
( b ) If entry is made for emergency purposes: ( 1 ) No person may enter the space that is fumigated or any adjoining spaces during fumigation unless he wears the personal protection equipment for the fumigant that is in use;
( 2 ) No person may enter the space that is fumigated unless the entry is made by a two person team; and
( 3 ) No person may enter the space that is fumigated unless he wears a lifeline and safety harness and each life-line is tended by a person who is outside the space and who is wearing the personal protection equipment for the fumigant that is in use.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to Section 10(a), Public Law 92-462, as amended, notice is hereby given of a forthcoming subcommittee site visit of the President's Commission on America's Returning Wounded Warriors. The purpose of the subcommittee site visit is to gather information.

# DATES:

Tuesday, 8 May 2007.

*Location:*                         Richmond, Virginia, McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 1201 Broad Rock Blvd, Phone 804-675-5000.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Col. Denise Daily, 703-588-0439.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

None.

# Note:

Exact order and topics may vary.

Dated: April 19, 2007.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.

[FR Doc. 07-2041 Filed 4-24-07; 8:45am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 40438 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MILJAN VILLALOBOS

- ALEMAN , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:19

- CR

- 7

- 1

Before CLEMENT, GRAVES, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Miljan Villalobos

- Aleman has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Villalobos

- Aleman h as not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant p art s of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 31, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-40438 Document: 00515253903 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/31/2019No. 19

- 40438

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from furt her responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 19-40438 Document: 00515253903 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/31/2019
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco

#   Board Actions 

## Actions taken during the week ending November 12, 2005

----

Bank Holding CompaniesBank of Montreal, Montreal, Canada; Harris Financial Corp., Chicago; Illinois, and Harris Bankcorp, Inc.  -- to acquire Edville Bankcorp, Inc., Villa Park, Illinois, and its subsidiary, Villa Park Trust & Savings Bank.					-Approved, November 10, 2005 					Sky Financial Group, Inc., Bowling Green, Ohio  -- to acquire Falls Bank, Stow, a state-chartered savings bank.					-Approved, November 9, 2005 					

EnforcementPlanters Bank and Trust Company, Staunton, Virginia  -- written agreement dated March 19, 2004, terminated October 28, 2005.					-Announced, November 7, 2005 					Virginia Heartland Bank, Fredericksburg, Virginia  -- written agreement dated March 19, 2004, terminated October 28, 2005.					-Announced, November 7, 2005 					

FormsForms  -- final Board review to extend without revision the Recordkeeping and Disclosure Requirements in Connection with Regulation M (Consumer Leasing).					-Approved, November 7, 2005 					

Testimony And StatementsBasel II Implementation and Revisions to Basel I  -- statement by Governor Bies before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.					-Published, November 10, 2005 					

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)  Board Actions | Actions   under delegated authority  Applications and reports received:Boston | New York | Philadelphia   | Cleveland | Richmond   | AtlantaChicago | St. Louis | Minneapolis   | Kansas City | Dallas   | San Francisco
Home | Banking information and regulationAccessibility | Contact   usLast update: November 17, 2005
SR

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0305

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL JOSEPH HOWARD,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including June 5, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response 

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

April 30 2020

04/30/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0305
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of Nursing Research Special Emphasis Panel, March 5, 2007, 5:30 p.m. to March 5, 2007, 6 p.m., Crowne Plaza Hotel, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20910 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 30, 2007, FR 07-359.                

The meeting date was changed from March 5, 2007 to April 11, 2007. The meeting begins at 7:30 a.m. and ends at 3 p.m. The meeting location changed from Crowne Plaza Hotel, Silver Spring to 6701 Democracy Blvd, Bethesda. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: April 2, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-1734 Filed 4-6-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# Senate Floor Activity - Monday, April 1, 2024

**

----

## Adjournment

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Floor Activity Summaries 

View previous floor activity files.Stream live Senate floor proceedings while a meeting is in progress.View past floor proceedings on CSPAN

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.

### Contact Your Senators 

Follow this guide on how to contact your senators by phone, postal mail, or on the web.
#### § 183.392 Radiotelephone installations.

A separate circuit, with overcurrent protection at the main distribution panel, must be provided for each radiotelephone installation.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**OF PATINA OIL & GAS CORPORATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.ss.1350**

 

1. I, Thomas J. Edelman, Chief Executive Officer of Patina Oil & Gas Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify to the best of my knowledge that the accompanying report on Form 10-K for the annualperiod ending December 31, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Report”) by the Company fully complies with the requirements ofthat section. 

 

2. I further certify to the best of my knowledge that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

The foregoing certification isbeing furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosuredocument. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Patina Oil & Gas Corporation and will be retained by Patina Oil & Gas Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 174.335 Watertight doors. ( a ) Each hopper dredge must have sliding watertight doors (Class 3) approved under § 170.270 of this chapter if the sill for the door is— ( 1 ) Installed below the bulkhead deck; and
( 2 ) Less than 24 inches above the final waterline as shown by the calculations required by § 174.310 in each damage condition up to and including the maximum amount of assumed damage.
( b ) Each hopper dredge must have sliding watertight doors (Class 3) approved under § 170.270 of this chapter, or quick acting hinged watertight doors (Class 1) approved under the same subpart if the sill of the watertight door is— ( 1 ) Installed below the bulkhead deck; and
( 2 ) Greater than 24 inches above the final waterline as shown by the calculations required by § 174.310 in each damage condition up to and including the maximum amount of assumed damage.
[CGD 76-080, 54 FR 36977, Sept. 6, 1989, as amended by CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50468, Sept. 29, 1995]
UNITED STATES DISTRlCT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRlCT OF COLUMBIA Srp ·!J 

I 0 1; iJL, I .. 

I It Jt/ 

DEMOCRATIC SENATORJAL 

CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE, 

Plaintiff, 

,. 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, 

Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 96-2184 (JHG) 

vf1LED 

..__ 

SEP 2 6 1996 

ORDER 

CLERK U.S. DIS fHIC I COURT 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

Upon c:cnsid~:ration of the Plaintiffs Motion for Expedited Consideration and To 

Shorten Time, tJ1e defendant's opposition, the parties' arguments at the Status Conference 

held this date, and the entire record in this matter, it is hereby 

ORDERED that the FEC shall file its answer, its opposition to the plaintiffs 

summary judgment moti on and its supporting chronology on or before October 3, 1996; it 

IS 

FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall file its reply, if any, not later than 

October I 0, 1996; it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that all papers are to be served by hand delivery to the 

opposing side on the date that such papers are filed with the Court; it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that should the parties propose that pot1ions of their 

filings be placed under seal, they shall identify those portions on a line-by-line, word-by-
word basis and identify with particularity in an accompanying motion to seal with 

associated memorandum of law why such lines or words must be placed under seal. As 

the Court stated in open Court, sealing is disfavored and should be requested sparingly. 

However, if the parties move to seal portions of their filings, redacted copies of those 

filings for the public docket shall also be filed ~ anc1 ;t ir 

FllRTIIER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall file its unredacted complaint under 

seal. Afkr comidc,·at-ion of the pending motion for summary judgm~nt, the Co·uri ·n-·ill 

review whether the sealing of this complaint and other sealed filings, if any, as well 

a~ the sealed of filings in the related case, Civ. No. 95-349, should be lifted. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

September 26, 1996. 

2 

~. u ;~, L 

JdYCE HENS GREEN "'=----

United States District Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration 

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. 

# ACTION:

Notice of RTCA Special Committee 214, Data Communications—Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) & Single European Sky ATM Research Initiatives. 

# SUMMARY:

The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a first meeting of RTCA Special Committee 214, Data Communication—Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) & Single European Sky ATM Research Initiatives. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held June 5-7, 2007 from 9 a.m.-5 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 833-9434; Web site                         *http://www.rtca.org*                         for directions.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (P.L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for a Special Committee 214 meeting. The agenda will include: 

*June 5-7:*

                    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in the                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                     section. Members of the public may present a written statement to the committee at any time.                 

      ( print page 26448)    
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 27, 2007. 

Francisco Estrada C., 

RTCA Advisory Committee. 

[FR Doc. 07-2271 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.176 Longitudinal contiguous hull structure. ( a ) The longitudinal contiguous hull structure of a vessel having cargo containment systems without secondary barriers must meet the standards of the American Bureau of Shipping published in “Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels”, 1981.
( b ) The longitudinal contiguous hull structure of a vessel having cargo containment systems with secondary barriers must be designed for a temperature that is: ( 1 ) Colder than the calculated temperature of this hull structure when: ( i ) The temperature of the secondary barrier is the design temperature; and
( ii ) For any waters in the world except Alaskan waters, the ambient cold condition of: ( A ) Five knots air at −18 °C (0 °F); and
( B ) Still sea water at 0 °C (32 °F); or
( iii ) For Alaskan waters the ambient cold condition of: ( A ) Five knots air at −29 °C (−20 °F); and
( B ) Still sea water at −2 °C (28 °F); or
( 2 ) Maintained by the heating system under § 154.178, if, without heat, the contiguous hull structure is designed for a temperature that is colder than the calculated temperature of the hull structure assuming the: ( i ) Temperature of the secondary barrier is the design temperature; and
( ii ) Ambient cold conditions of still air at 5 °C (41 °F) and still sea water at 0 °C (32 °F).
[CGD 74-289, 44 FR 26009, May 3, 1979, as amended by CGD 77-069, 52 FR 31630, Aug. 21, 1987]
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.



### S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee, UNPUBLISHED August 5, 2021

v No. 351789

Washtenaw Circuit Court

MARCUS TYREE LASHAWN WALKER, LC No. 17

- 000800

- FC

Defendant

- Appellant.

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v No. 352198

Washtenaw Circuit Court
RICO MONTEZ CHANDLER, LC No. 19

- 000073

- FC

Defendant

- Appellant.

Before: F ORT H OOD , P.J., and M ARKEY and G LEICHER , JJ.

G LEICHER

, J. ( concurring )

I concur with the affirmance of both defendants’ convictions. I write separately to suggest that the prosecutor’s questioning of defendant Rico Chandler regarding statements made by

defendant Marcus Wa lker constitute d a violation of the rule announced in Bruton v United States

, 391 US 123; 88 S Ct 1620; 20 L Ed 2d 476 (1968). During defendant Chandler’s cross

examination, t he prosecutor specifically and repeatedly referenced defendant Walker’s testimon y that Chandler had shot and killed the victim. This was not only prosecutorial misconduct, as my colleagues point out, but also a violation of Chandler’s Confrontation Clause rights. To his great credit, the assistant prosecuting attorney who argued thi s case conceded that a Bruton error had

been committed.

The prosecution used Walker’s statements against Chandler in an unmistakable manner. By asking at the outset of the cross

- examination whether Chandler was “present in the courtroom- 2

-

and

. . . heard t hat your very own co

- Defendant, Mr. Walker, told the police that you told them that you shot and killed Dominque Lee,” the prosecutor introduced Walker’s statement. This was an undisguised attempt at an end

- run around Bruton , and in my view the error is indistinguishable. Chandler’s counsel did not object. I would hold that the use of Walker’s testimony constituted plain error and obviously violated Chandler’s Sixth Amendment rights. See United States v

Powell , 732 F3d 361

, 378

- 379 (CA 5, 2013).

Nevertheless, the evidence marshalled against Chandler was substantial and compelling. Although th e introduction of Walker’s statement was plain error and substantially affected the fairness of the proceedings, I am convinced th at the violation of Chandler’s constitutional right was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Even absent the Bruton error, no reasonable probability exists that Chandler would have been acquitted. On this basis, I concur with the majority’s

resolution of Chandler’s appellate arguments

.

/s/ Elizabeth L. Gleicher