alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT ITEM31.1**

SECTION 302CERTIFICATION

I, Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr. certify that:

1.          Ihave read this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Northern California Bancorp,Inc.;

2.          Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.          Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.          Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)             designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;

b)            evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofthe end of the period (the “Evaluation Date”); and

c)             presentedin this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.          Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee orregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)             allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)            anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 
| Date: March 22, 2007 | ** ** | **/s/ Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr.** | ** ** |
|----------------------|------------|-------------------------------------|------------|
|                 |       | Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr.         |
|                 |       | Chairman of the Board &         |
|                 |       | Chief Executive Officer             |

 

----
#### Elsbeth M. Szag, Respondent, *v.*Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Appellant.

(Argued February 7, 1910;

decided February 15, 1910.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 21,1909, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and affirming an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s negligence.

The motion was made upon the grounds that the exceptions *613presented no question of law for review, and that the appeal had been taken for purpose of delay only.

*Ralph S. Kent*for motion.

*Frank Rumsey*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
Exhibit 23.2




              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS





We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of Spurlock  Industries,  Inc. dated August 6, 1996 of our
report  dated  January 17, 1997  (except for Note 2, for which the date is March
13, 1998), relating to the financial statements of Spurlock Industries,  Inc. as
of December 31, 1996.



                                        /s/ Winter, Scheifley & Associates, P.C.
                                        Winter, Scheifley & Associates, P.C.
                                        Certified Public Accountants

April 17, 1998
Englewood, Colorado
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending March 4, 2006

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|EAST PENN BANK    | * Branch       | East Penn Bank, Emmaus, PA, to establish a branch office at 2985 Macarthur Road, Whitehall Township, Lehigh County, PA. | Newspaper:03/14/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 03/14/2006    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

Jeffrey E. Platt, CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Penhall International Corp.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Jeffrey E. Platt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Jeffrey E. Platt Jeffrey E. Platt
Chief Financial Officer
February 17, 2004

The foregoing certification is furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               3
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    49835
<ALLOWANCES>                                       455
<INVENTORY>                                      50577
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                107019
<PP&E>                                          250150
<DEPRECIATION>                                   22996
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  388062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            57809
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       18694
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    388062
<SALES>                                         393696
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                393696
<CGS>                                           361465
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   361465
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               22803
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7181)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2729)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4452)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4452)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21.1
 PRG-SCHULTZ INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 SUBSIDIARIES
 Company
    
    Jurisdiction of OrganizationPRG-Schultz USA, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaThe Profit Recovery Group Asia, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG-Schultz Australia, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG-Schultz Belgium, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG-Schultz Canada, LLC
    
    GeorgiaThe Profit Recovery Group Costa Rica, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaThe Profit Recovery Group New Zealand, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaThe Profit Recovery Group Netherlands, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaThe Profit Recovery Group Mexico, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG-Schultz France, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaThe Profit Recovery Group Germany, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaThe Profit Recovery Group South Africa, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG-Schultz Switzerland, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaThe Profit Recovery Group Italy, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaThe Profit Recovery Group Spain, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG-Schultz Portugal, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG International, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG USA, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG-Schultz Scandinavia, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG-Schultz Japan, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG-Schultz Puerto Rico, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG-Schultz Chile, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG-Schultz Europe, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaPRG-Schultz Brasil, LLC
    
    GeorgiaThe Profit Recovery Group Holdings Mexico, S de RL de CV
    
    MexicoThe Profit Recovery Group Servicios Mexico S de RL de CV
    
    MexicoThe Profit Recovery Group de Mexico S de RL de CV
    
    MexicoThe Profit Recovery Group Argentina S.A.
    
    ArgentinaProfit Recovery Brasil Ltda.
    
    BrazilPRG-Schultz International PTE LTD
    
    SingaporePRG-Schultz Suzhou Co Ltd.
    
    ChinaPRG-Schultz CR s.r.o.
    
    Czech RepublicPRGFS, Inc.
    
    DelawareHS&A Acquisition  UK Inc.
    
    TexasMeridian Corporation Limited
    
    Jersey (Channel Islands)Tamebond Limited
    
    United KingdomJA Ewing, Inc.
    
    New YorkPRG-Schultz Ireland LTD
    
    IrelandPRG-Schultz UK Limited
    
    United KingdomPRG-Schultz Canada Corp.
    
    CanadaPRG-Schultz (Deutschland) GmbH
    
    Germany




---



##### 



Company
    
    Jurisdiction of OrganizationPRG-Schultz Nederland B.V.
    
    NetherlandsPRG-Schultz Italia SRL
    
    ItalyPRG-Schultz Puerto Rico
    
    Puerto RicoPRG-Schultz Peru S.R.L.
    
    PeruPRG-Schultz Colombia Ltda.
    
    ColumbiaPRG-Schultz Svenska AB
    
    SwedenPRG-Schultz Venezuela. S. R. L.
    
    VenezuelaPRG-Schultz Polska Sp. z o.o
    
    PolandHoward Schultz & Associates (Asia) Limited
    
    Hong KongHS&A International PTE LTD
    
    SingaporePRG-Schultz (Thailand) Limited
    
    ThailandHoward Schultz de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoPRGDS, LLC
    
    GeorgiaPRGTS, LLC
    
    Georgia
# C_2012227EN.01003701.xml

| 28.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/37

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 13 June 2012 — Davids v Commission

(Case F-105/11) (1)

1

(Civil Service - Temporary agents - Temporary agent occupying a permanent post - Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract - Discretion of the administration - Article 8 of the CEOS - Article 4 of the Decision of the Director General of OLAF of 30 June 2005 on a new policy for the engagement and use of OLAF's temporary agents - Maximum duration of temporary staff contracts - Abuse of rights)

2012/C 227/61

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hans Davids (Doorn, Netherlands) (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the Director-General of OLAF to reject the applicant’s request for the extension of the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff within the meaning of Article 2(b) of the Conditions of Employment

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 7.1.12, p. 26.

1

---
Case 2:14-cv-11691-LJM-MKM ECF No. 291, PageID.7489 Filed 02/10/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:14-cv-11691-LJM-MKM ECF No. 291, PageID.7490 Filed 02/10/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:14-cv-11691-LJM-MKM ECF No. 291, PageID.7491 Filed 02/10/20 Page 3 of 3
**Order of the President of the General Court of 11 May 2011 – Cahier and Others v Council and Commission**

**(Case T-195/11 R)**

Interim proceedings – Non-contractual liability – Application for interim measures – Inadmissible in part – No urgency

1.                     *Application for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Conditions for admissibility – Action brought against
the measure forming the subject-matter of the application for suspension – Action for suspension of a provision of a regulation
– Main action limited to a claim for compensation – Inadmissibility (Art. 278 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court,
Art. 104(1)) (see para. 13)*

2.                     *Application for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Interim measures – Conditions for granting – Urgency
– Serious and irreparable damage – Financial loss – Claim for interim relief submitted by several applicants – Burden of proof
(Arts 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 104(2)) (see paras 15-20)*

3.                     *Application for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Interim measures – Conditions for granting – Serious
and irreparable damage – Alleged loss arising from measures imposing pecuniary obligations at national level – National rights
of action – Effect (Arts 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU) (see paras 21-22)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for interim measures and suspension of operation of Article 28 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine (OJ 1999 L 179, p. 1), as maintained in force by Article 128(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 of 29 April 2008 on the common organisation of the market in wine, amending Regulations (EC) No 1493/1999, (EC) No 1782/2003, (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 3/2008 and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 2392/86 and (EC) No 1493/1999 (OJ 2008 L 148, p. 1). |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Costs are reserved. |
EXHIBIT 32.1

                        ICY SPLASH FOOD & BEVERAGE, INC.
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Icy Splash Food &
Beverage, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), the undersigned, Joseph Aslan, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company and Charles Tokarz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Icy Splash Food & Beverage, Inc. and will be retained by Icy Splash
Food & Beverage, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

Date:  December 2, 2005
                                           /s/ Joseph Aslan
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           Joseph Aslan
                                           Chief Executive Officer


                                           /s/ Charles Tokarz
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           Charles Tokarz
                                           Chief Financial Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2432 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the deduction for 

State and local sales taxes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2009 

Ms. KOSMAS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the deduction for State and local sales taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Sales Tax Relief 

5 Act’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2432 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF ELECTION TO DEDUCT STATE AND 

2 LOCAL SALES TAXES. 

3 Subparagraph (I) of section 164(b)(5) of the Internal 

4 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘January 

5 1, 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2011’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
§ 176.800 Inspection standards. ( a ) A vessel is inspected for compliance with the standards required by this subchapter. Machinery, equipment, materials, and arrangements not covered by standards in this subchapter may be inspected in accordance with standards acceptable to the cognizant OCMI as good marine practice.
( b ) In the application of inspection standards due consideration must be given to the hazards involved in the operation permitted by a vessel's Certificate of Inspection. Thus, the standards may vary in accordance with the vessel's area of operation or any other operational restrictions or limitations.
( c ) The published standards of classification societies and other recognized safety associations may be used as guides in the inspection of vessels when such standards do not conflict with the requirements of this subchapter.
#### ROBERT J. CARROLL v. HAROLD B. MICKENS.

Decided April 16, 1929.

Before Mr. Justice Parker, at chambers.

Eor the plaintiff, *Harold A. Price.*

For the defendant, *Garret C. Ilouman.*

Memorandum by

Parker, J.

When this rule was argued I had the impression that‘the suit was based on an alleged fraudulent conversion by defendant of an automobile entrusted to him to sell and account in an agreed manner for the proceeds. That' would have amounted to embezzlement or something closely akin to it, and would have been essentially fraudulent. *Seidel*v. *Peschkaw,*27 *N. J. L.*427, 432; *Truax*v. *Pennsylvania Railroad Co.,*56 *Id.*277; *Haggerty*v. *Badkin,*72 *N. J. Eq.*475, 491; 5 *C. J.*450, &c.

But an examination of the complaint in this case (which was not before me at the argument) shows that it is founded upon the “sale and delivery” of an automobile upon the agreement of the defendant to secure and deliver to plaintiff a new car, at which time plaintiff was to pay him $100 in addition to the old car already sold and delivered.

This is mere broken promise, which normally involves nothing fraudulent. Occasionally in equity we meet a case *410in which the proof shows an existing intent at the time of the promise, not to keep it *(Bowker*v. *Cunningham,*78 *N. J. Fq.*458), and perhaps this might hold good in certain cases even at law. See *Wolters*v. *Fidelity Co.,*73 *N. J. L.*57, 61; 26 *C. J.*1093. But I need not pursue this line of thought, because I find nothing in the evidence to satisfy me that the defendant willfully misrepresented his intent, and the fact that he bought an automobile without paying for it means nothing by way of fraud.

The rule to show cause will be discharged, but without costs.
# C_2014372EN.01001301.xml

| 20.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 372/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 372/13

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 September 2014 — Éditions Odile Jacob v Commission

(Case T-471/11) (1)

1

((Competition - Concentrations - Book publishing market - Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the common market subject to sale of assets - Decision approving the purchaser of the assets sold - Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of the initial decision concerning the same procedure - Legal interest in bringing proceedings - Breach of Article 266 TFEU - Failure to comply with the commitments imposed by the conditional clearance decision - Distinction between conditions and obligations - Principle of non-retroactivity - Assessment of the prospective purchaser - Purchaser’s independence from the seller - Misuse of power - Obligation to state reasons))

2014/C 372/16

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Éditions Odile Jacob SAS (Paris, France) (represented initially by O. Fréget, M. Struys and L. Eskenazi, then by O. Fréget, L. Eskenazi and D. Béranger and lastly by O. Fréget and L. Eskenazi, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito, O. Beynet and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Lagardère SCA (Paris, France) (represented by: A. Winckler, F. de Bure, J.-B. Pinçon and L. Bary, lawyers); and Wendel (Paris) (represented by: M. Trabucchi, F. Gordon and A. Gosset-Grainville, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C (2011) 3503 of 13 May 2011, adopted in Case COMP/M.2978 — Lagardère/Natexis/VUP following the judgment of 13 September 2010 in Éditions Odile Jacob v Commission (T-452/04, ECR, EU:T:2010:385), by which the Commission once again approved Wendel Investissement as purchaser of the assets sold pursuant to the commitments attached to the Commission’s decision of 7 January 2004 authorising the concentration Lagardère/Natexis/VUP.

Éditions Odile Jacob

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Éditions Odile Jacob SAS to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Éditions Odile Jacob SAS to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 305, 15.10.2011.

1

---