alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Central Federal Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 16, 2009
    /s/ Therese Ann LiutkusTherese Ann Liutkus, CPATreasurer and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2015279EN.01002901.xml

| 24.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2015 — Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp v OHIM — Vincci Hoteles (NANU)

(Case T-89/11) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark NANU - Earlier Community word mark NAMMU - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 279/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: A. Nordemann and T. Boddien, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Vincci Hoteles, SA (Alcobendas, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 November 2010 (Case R 641/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Vincci Hoteles, SA and Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 113, 9.4.2011.

---
Exhibit 26 

2:14-cv-11700-PDB-MJH Doc # 1-27 Filed 04/29/14 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 308
2:14-cv-11700-PDB-MJH Doc # 1-27 Filed 04/29/14 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 309
Page, Eric 8/14/2012 12:00:00 PM

 1 A. I was part of it, but it wasn't -- they were -- Strategic

 2 Revenue Solutions approached the owners of the facility

 3 and then I was involved after that.

 4 Q. And who are the owners of the facility?

 5 A. Oakwood Health Systems, Oakwood Hospital, and Madras,

 6 M-a-d-r-a-s.

 7 Q. Okay. So you -- just to clarify, Oakwood Health Systems

 8 owns Maple Millennium?

 9 A. It's a partnership between Oakwood Health Systems and

10 Madras.

11 Q. And so Oakwood Health Systems and Madras are the

12 partners. Is that correct?

13 A. Uh-huh.

14 Q. And what is Madras?

15 A. It's a group of investors.

16 Q. Do you know how many investors?

17 A. The exact number, I do not know.

18 Q. Do you know approximately?

19 A. I believe two to four, but there might be some silent

20 investors and I just -- I don't want to speak to it for

21 sure.

22 Q. Okay. And what would give you the impression that there

23 would be silent investors?

24 A. Again, I don't know the complete set-up of Madras, so --

25 so I believe I misspoke, then. I'm saying there's two to

State Farm - Maple Millennium Unsigned Page 5 - 6

 5 

Page, Eric 8/14/2012 12:00:00 PM

 1 four but I don't know exactly their names so I don't want

 2 to say for sure.

 3 Q. Do you know any of the names of the two to four?

 4 A. Sure. Dr. Ram Gunabalan, G-u-n-a-b-a-l-a-n.

 5 Q. And I'm sorry, you said that's Ram?

 6 A. Ram.

 7 Q. R-o-m?

 8 A. R-a-m.

 9 Q. R-a-m.

10 A. Yeah.

11 Q. Ram Gunabalan?

12 A. Yeah.

13 Q. And he is, just to clarify, one of the investors of

14 Madras. Is that correct?

15 A. Yes. Yeah.

16 Q. Okay.

17 A. And then there's his partner and, again, I don't know the

18 exact name of it. That's why I don't know how many people

19 are involved in that. That's why I can't speak to it, so

20 -- but those two entities make up Madras.

21 Q. Okay. Do you know his partner?

22 A. No, I don't.

23 Q. Okay. But you know he has a partner?

24 A. Uh-huh.

25 Q. And how do you know he has a partner?

State Farm - Maple Millennium Unsigned Page 5 - 6

 6 

2:14-cv-11700-PDB-MJH Doc # 1-27 Filed 04/29/14 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 310
§ 179.212 Watertight bulkheads for subdivision and damage stability. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, each vessel must comply with the Type II subdivision and damage stability requirements of §§ 171.070 through 171.073 and 171.080 of this chapter if it meets one or more of the following criteria: ( 1 ) Is more than 19.8 meters (65 feet) in length;
( 2 ) Carries more than 49 passengers;
( 3 ) Is constructed of wood on or after March 11, 2001, and operates in cold water; or
( 4 ) Is constructed before January 1, 2009 and carries more than 12 passengers on an international voyage.
( b ) Vessels constructed on or after January 1, 2009 and carrying more than 12 passengers on an international voyage must comply with the applicable requirements of IMO Res. MSC.216(82) (incorporated by reference, see § 179.15) unless permitted otherwise.
( c ) As an alternative to complying with the Type II subdivision and damage stability requirements of §§ 171.070 through 171.073 and 171.080 of this chapter, a monohull vessel which undergoes a simplified stability proof test in accordance with § 178.330 of this chapter may comply with § 179.220 of this part.
( d ) For the purpose of demonstrating compliance with the Type II subdivision and damage stability requirements of §§ 171.070 through 171.073 and 171.080 of this chapter, the requirements of IMO Res. MSC.216(82) may be considered equivalent.
[USCG-2007-0030, 75 FR 78091, Dec. 14, 2010]
exv10w1



 






Exhibit 10.1




SUMMARY OF FISCAL YEAR 2006 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR CASH

COMPENSATION




     All directors who are not employees of the Company receive an annual retainer of $20,000
(increased from $15,000 in fiscal year 2005) for serving as a director of the Company. The
Chairman of the Board, who is not an employee of the Company, will continue to receive an annual
retainer of $50,000 for serving the Board as chairman. The Chairmen of the Audit Committee and
Compensation Committee receive annual retainers of $10,000 (increased from $5,000) and $5,000
(increased from $3,000), respectively. The Company also reimburses all directors for travel,
lodging and related expenses incurred in attending Board and committee meetings. Directors who are
not employees of the Company receive a fee of $1,500 per day (increased from $1,000) for each Board
or committee meeting attended in person, and $750 per day (increased from $500) for each Board or
committee meeting attended by phone conference, provided that no director shall receive attendance
fees with respect to more than two meetings which occur on the same day.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JEFFREY TODD KNUDSON,

Plaintiff, No. 14-14854

v. District Judge George Caram Steeh

Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

AMERICAN STEAMSHIP COMPANY,

ET AL., 

Defendants.

 /

ORDER

For the reasons and under the terms stated on the record on November 7, 2019,

Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Compel Defendants’ Financial Statements, Tax Returns and

Wage Information [ECF No. 212] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

The motion is GRANTED as follows:

-Defendants1 will produce what they refer to as their unaudited financial

statements.

-Defendants will produce their own financial documents that they provided to

GATX, their parent company, and which are therefore in Defendants’ constructive

possession. Defendants will request that GATX provide to them all financial information

that they forwarded to GATX in the years 2013 to 2019. If GATX represents that it does

not have responsive documents, or refuses to provide the documents to Defendants, the

Defendants will so inform counsel for Plaintiff.

1

 When referred to in the plural, “Defendants” applies to both American Steamship

Company and Liberty Steamship Company.

-1-
-The Plaintiff may also serve a non-party subpoena, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 45, on

GATX, requesting financial information regarding Defendants, including tax documents. 

GATX may redact from its tax documents any information not pertaining to Defendants.

Discovery is extended 30 days from the date of this Order solely for the purpose of

allowing Plaintiff to serve the Rule 45 subpoena.

The motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff’s request for the production of additional

wage and earnings information of similarly situated Liberty Steamship Company

employees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 7, 2019 s/R. Steven Whalen 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify on November 7, 2019 that I electronically filed the foregoing paper

with the Clerk of the Court sending notification of such filing to all counsel registered

electronically. I hereby certify that a copy of this paper was mailed to the following nonregistered ECF participants November 7, 2019.

s/Carolyn M. Ciesla 

Case Manager for the 

Honorable R. Steven Whalen 

-2-
2008 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

10-17-2008

Bond v. Beard

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 06-9002

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2008 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Bond v. Beard" (2008). 2008 Decisions. Paper 280.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008/280
PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

Nos. 06-9002 & 06-9003

 

JESSE BOND

Appellant (No. 06-9002)

v.

JEFFREY BEARD; WILLIAM STICKMAN; JOSEPH MAZURKIEWICZ;

THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA;

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA

Appellant (No. 06-9003)

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civil Action No. 02-cv-08592)

District Judge: Honorable John P. Fullam

 

Argued April 8, 2008

Before: AMBRO, SMITH and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed August 20, 2008)

ORDER AMENDING PRECEDENTIAL OPINION

AMBRO, Circuit Judge

IT IS NOW ORDERED that the published Opinion in the above case filed August

20, 2008, be amended as follows:

On page 9, in the second line of the block quote, replace the n-dash with an mdash.
2

On page 10, in the last line of the first partial paragraph, replace the n-dash with an

m-dash.

On page 10, in the last line, replace the n-dash with an m-dash.

On page 11, at the end of the second “Prosecutor” entry, replace the n-dash with an

m-dash.

On page 12, insert “[,]” after “At the defendant’s request” in the sixth line from the

bottom and after “After being challenged a second time” in the third line from the bottom.

On page 13, in the second-to-last line of the first partial paragraph, replace the

hyphen in “1821-1828” with an n-dash.

On page 23, note 10, second line, replace “498” with “488” (i.e., replace “9” with

“8”).

On page 29, in the second-to-last line of the paragraph beginning “Bond’s mother,

Queenie Victoria....”, replace the n-dash with an m-dash.

On page 31, in the second line of the paragraph headed “School Records”, replace

both n-dashes with m-dashes.

On page 33, in the first line of the second full paragraph, insert a comma after

“Ph.D.” to read “Allan Tepper, Ph.D., to evaluate Bond”.

By the Court,

/s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge

Dated: October 17, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.2

UGC EUROPE, INC.    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of UGC Europe, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles H.R. Bracken, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

Date:
November 13, 2003

| |  | By: | /s/CHARLES H.R. BRACKENCharles H.R. Bracken Chief Financial Officer
| |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 82 (Monday, April 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21206-21207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2099]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of New Fee Site; Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act 
(Title VIII, Pub. L. 108-447)

AGENCY: Tonto National Forest, USDA Forest Service

ACTION:  Notice of new fee site (Reference to previously published 
Federal Register document, Vol. 772, No. 12, Page 2490, January 19, 
2007).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Tonto National Forest plans to implement a $6 per vehicle 
fee for overnight camping and day-use at Haigler Canyon Recreation 
Site. This site is undergoing major improvements which will increase 
facilities and services available to the public once completed. Fees 
paid at similar recreation sites on the Tonto National Forest 
demonstrate that the public appreciates and enjoys the availability of 
developed recreation sites and is willing to pay reasonable fees for 
use of such sites. Funds from the fee revenue will be used for the 
continued operation and maintenance of Haigler Canyon Recreation Site.

DATES: Haigler Canyon will become available for recreation use in 
August, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Forest Supervisor, Tonto National Forest, 2324 E. McDowell 
Road, Phoenix, AZ 85006

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Killebrew, Recreation Fee 
Coordinator, 602-225-5239

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Recreation Lands Enhancement Act 
(Title VIII, Pub. L. 108-447) directed the Secretary of Agriculture to 
publish a six month advance notice in the Federal Register whenever new 
recreation fee areas are established.
    This new fee will be reviewed by a Recreation Resource Advisory 
Committee prior to a final decision and implementation. The Arizona 
Bureau of Land Management Resource Advisory Council serves as the 
Recreation Resource Advisory Committee for this project.
    The Tonto National Forest currently has over 50 recreation sites 
where use fees are charged. A business analysis has shown that people 
desire having this sort of recreation experience on the Tonto National 
Forest. A market analysis indicates that the $6 per vehicle fee is both 
reasonable and acceptable for camping and day-use at Haigler Canyon. 
Once the site is complete, visitors wanting to use facilities at 
Haigler Canyon Recreation

[[Page 21207]]

Site can obtain self-validating passes at more than 150 commercial 
vendors in central Arizona including at least three locations in 
Payson, Arizona or at any Tonto National Forest administrative office 
including the Payson and Pleasant Valley ranger stations. An on-site 
fee payment option may also be provided. Details about the Tonto fee 
program can be found at the Tonto National Forest Web site, http://www.fs.fed.us/r3/tonto or by calling 602-225-5200.

    Dated: April 24, 2006.
Gene Blankenbaker,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 07-2099 Filed 4-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### § 169.726 Radar reflector.

Each nonmetallic vessel less than 90 feet in length must exhibit a radar reflector of suitable size and design while underway.
# C_2014159EN.01000201.xml

| 26.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 159/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 159/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 April 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — United Kingdom) — Felixstowe Dock and Railway Company Ltd and Others v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs

(Case C-80/12) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom of establishment - Corporation tax - Tax relief - Groups of companies and consortia - National legislation permitting losses to be transferred between a company belonging to a consortium and a company that is a member of a group which are connected by a ‘link company’ that is a member of both the group and the consortium - Residence condition for the ‘link company’ - Discrimination on the basis of where the corporate seat is located - Ultimate group parent company established in a third State and owning the companies which are seeking to transfer losses through companies established in third States))

2014/C 159/02

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Felixstowe Dock and Railway Company Ltd, Savers Health and Beauty Ltd, Walton Container Terminal Ltd, WPCS (UK) Finance Ltd, AS Watson Card Services (UK) Ltd, Hutchison Whampoa (Europe) Ltd, Kruidvat UK Ltd, Superdrug Stores plc

Applicants:

Respondent: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs

Respondent:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — Interpretation of Articles 49 TFEU and 54 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Tax legislation — Corporation tax — Tax relief — National legislation permitting the transfer of losses sustained by a company that is established in the United Kingdom and owned by a consortium to a company established in the same State and belonging to a group of companies, subject to those two companies being connected through a link company which is a member of both the group and the consortium — Link company required to be established in the United Kingdom or to carry on a trade in the United Kingdom through a permanent establishment

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 49 TFEU and 54 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State under which it is possible for a resident company that is a member of a group to have transferred to it losses sustained by another resident company which belongs to a consortium where a ‘link company’ which is a member of both the group and the consortium is also resident in that Member State, irrespective of the residence of the companies which hold, themselves or by means of intermediate companies, the capital of the link company and of the other companies concerned by the transfer of losses, whereas that legislation rules out such a possibility where the link company is established in another Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 184, 23.6.2012.

1

---
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 99.1

                              CAUTIONARY STATEMENT


         Reality Interactive, Inc. (the "Company"), or persons acting on behalf
of the Company, or outside reviewers retained by the Company making statements
on behalf of the Company, or underwriters, from time to time make, in writing or
orally, "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. When used in conjunction with an identified
forward-looking statement, this Cautionary Statement is for the purpose of
qualifying for the "safe harbor" provisions of such sections and is intended to
be a readily available written document that contains factors which could cause
results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements. These factors
are in addition to any other cautionary statements, written or oral, which may
be made or referred to in connection with any such forward-looking statement.

         The following matter, among others, may have a material adverse effect
on the business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations or
prospects, financial or otherwise, of the Company. Reference to this Cautionary
Statement in the context of a forward-looking statement or statements shall be
deemed to be a statement that may cause actual results to differ materially from
those in such forward-looking statement or statements:

         DISCONTINUATION OF CURRENT OPERATIONS. The Company ceased its business
operations effective April 30, 1999. Management of the Company believes this
action was necessary in light of the Company's current liquidity needs and lack
of short-term revenue opportunities. The Company is currently exploring
potential uses for the Company in its current form as an inoperative public
company. In the meantime, the Company intends to comply with all SEC filing
requirements in order to maintain the Company's good standing under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In the event the Company is unable
to find a suitable acquisition or merger candidate or other suitable use for the
Company in the near future, the Company will be liquidated and its remaining
assets will be distributed to its creditors in satisfaction of its then-current
obligations and, if any assets remain thereafter, to its shareholders. There can
be no assurance that any such candidate or other suitable use for the Company or
its assets will be found.