alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Central Federal Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 13, 2007
    /s/ Mark S. AllioMark S. AllioChairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer 30.
**RB** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 3 - 0 393 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. JUSTIN DEAN KALINA ,

Defendant and Appellan

t . **GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appell ee ’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appell ee is gran ted an extension of time to and including February 11 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court January 4 2024

01/04/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0393
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending April 1, 2006

|Filer                          | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------------------ | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------
|CHICOPEE BANCORP, INC.         | * 3A1          | Chicopee Bancorp, Inc., Chicopee, Massachusetts, to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100% of the common stock of Chicopee Savings Bank, Chicopee, Massachusetts, which is converting from mutual to stock form.                  | Newspaper:04/14/2006Federal Register:04/17/2006    
|Newspaper:                     | 04/14/2006    
|Federal Register:              | 04/17/2006    
|INVESTORS BANK & TRUST COMPANY | Other Foreign  | Investors Bank & Trust Company, Boston, Massachusetts, to establish an Edge Corporation, Investors International Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts, pursuant to section 25A of the Federal Reserve Act and section 211.5 of Regulation K. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:04/21/2006
|Newspaper:                     | Not applicable
|Federal Register:              | 04/21/2006    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 22 

To amend chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, to allow the United 

States Postal Service to pay its share of contributions for annuitants’ 

health benefits out of the Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mr. MCHUGH (for himself and Mr. DAVIS of Illinois) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 

Reform 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, to 

allow the United States Postal Service to pay its share 

of contributions for annuitants’ health benefits out of 

the Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GOVERNMENT CONTRIBUTIONS FOR POSTAL 

4 ANNUITANTS’ HEALTH BENEFITS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8906(g)(2)(A) of title 5, 

6 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘shall through 

7 September 30, 2016, be paid by the United States Postal 

8 Service, and thereafter’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 22 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall be effective as of October 1, 2008. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
# C_2014093EN.01000901.xml

| 29.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 February 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat des Landes Oberösterreich (Austria)) — Proceedings initiated by Susanne Sokoll-Seebacher

(Case C-367/12) (1)

1

(Freedom of establishment - Public health - Article 49 TFEU - Pharmacies - Adequate supply of medicinal products to the public - Operating authorisation - Territorial distribution of pharmacies - Establishment of limits essentially based on a demographic criterion - Minimum distance between pharmacies)

2014/C 93/13

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat des Landes Oberösterreich

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Susanne Sokoll-Seebacher

Third party: Agnes Hemetsberger, successor to Susanna Zehetner

Third party:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat des Landes Oberösterreich — Interpretation of Article 49 TFEU and Articles 16 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Member State's rules which make the award of a concession to operate a pharmacy subject to an assessment of the needs of the market based on a number of complex and almost unforeseeable criteria.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 49 TFEU, in particular the requirement that the desired objective be achieved in a consistent manner, must be interpreted as precluding legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which lays down, as an essential criterion for determining whether a need for the establishment of a new pharmacy exists, a rigid limit on the ‘people remaining to be served’, where the competent authorities cannot depart from that limit to take account of particular local geographical conditions.

---

(1)  OJ C 331, 27.10.2012.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, DanielDrummond, Chief Excecutive Officer of UAGH, Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)

the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter endedDecember 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and

(2)

theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

Date:  March 26, 2009

*/s/ Daniel Drummond        *

Daniel Drummond

Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act hasbeen furnished to UAGH, Inc. and will be retained by UAGH, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Denise Nitti

Plaintiff,

v.

Asset Acceptance, LLC

Defendant.

Case No. 2:14-cv-14900-AC-RSW

District Judge: Avern Cohn

Magistrate Judge: R. Steven Whalen

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE

Now come the parties, through counsel, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 

41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby dismiss the present action with prejudice, each party to bear 

its own costs.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

Hyslip & Taylor, LLC, LPA

By: /s/ David M. Menditto

David M. Menditto

1100 W. Cermak Rd., Suite B410

Chicago, IL 60608

Telephone: 312-380-6110

Email: davidm@fairdebt411.com

Illinois Bar No. 6216541

Attorney for Plaintiff

Date: April 21, 2015

Dykema Gossett, PLLC

By: /s/ Theodore W. Seitz

Theodore W. Seitz

201 Townsend Street, Suite 900

Lansing, MI 48993

Telephone: 517-374-9149

Email: tseitz@dykema.com

Michigan Bar No. P60320

Attorney for Defendant

Date: April 21, 2015

Case 2:14-cv-14900-AC-RSW ECF No. 12, PageID.42 Filed 04/21/15 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on April 21, 2015, I electronically filed the foregoing 

Stipulation through the court’s CM/ECF system, which will perfect service upon 

the following:

Theodore W. Seitz

Dykema Gossett, PLLC

201 Townsend Street, Suite 900

Lansing, MI 48933

Counsel for:

Asset Acceptance, LLC

/s/ David M. Menditto

Case 2:14-cv-14900-AC-RSW ECF No. 12, PageID.43 Filed 04/21/15 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                  AS ADDED BY
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Florida Business BancGroup,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, A. Bronson
Thayer, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
         of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the
         Report.

Date: November 5, 2003                 By: /s/ A. Bronson Thayer
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           A. Bronson Thayer, Chairman and Chief
                                              Executive Officer
----

----

| Dated      as of February 27, 2008     |   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                   |   |   |
|                                   |   |   |
| /s/  Joseph      L. Sullivan |   |   |
| Joseph      L. Sullivan                |   |   |
|                                   |   |   |
| /s/  Patrick      J. Goodman |   |   |
| Patrick      J. Goodman                |   |   |
|                                   |   |   |
| /s/      Eulogio Wilfredo G. Sarmago   |   |   |
| Eulogio      Wilfredo G. Sarmago       |   |   |
|                                   |   |   |
| /s/  Trinity      S. Gatuz   |   |   |
| Trinity      S. Gatuz                  |   |   |
|                                   |   |   |
| /s/  Belinda      E. Dugan   |   |   |
| Belinda      E. Dugan                  |   |   |
|                                   |   |   |
| /s/  Suzy      Lyn A. Bayona |   |   |
| Suzy      Lyn A. Bayona                |   |   |
|                                   |   |   |
| /s/  P.      Eric Connor     |   |   |
| P.      Eric Connor                    |   |   |
|                                   |   |   |
|                                   |   |   |
|                                   |   |   |
|                                   |   |   |
|                                   |   |   |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

COREY HINTON, #646238,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 2:15-CV-10687

HONORABLE DENISE PAGE HOOD

ROBERT NAPEL,

Respondent.

_______________________________/

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PETITIONER’S

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AS TO EXPANSION OF RECORD

This is a habeas case brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Corey Hinton

(“Petitioner”) was convicted of felony murder, Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.316, felon

in possession of a firearm, Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.224f, and possession of a firearm

during the commission of a felony, Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.227b, following a jury

trial in the Wayne County Circuit Court. He was sentenced to life imprisonment

without parole, a concurrent term of one to seven and one-half years imprisonment,

and a consecutive term of two years imprisonment on those convictions. In his

pleadings, Petitioner raises claims concerning the non-production of a witness and the

admission of his prior testimony, the jury instructions, the composition of the jury, and

the effectiveness of trial and appellate counsel.

The Court previously denied Petitioner’s motions to expand the record to add

his own affidavit and mental health records, which he believes are relevant to his

2:15-cv-10687-DPH-PTM Doc # 16 Filed 05/24/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1790
ineffective assistance of counsel claims. Petitioner now seeks reconsideration of that

decision requesting that the Court expand the record to include his pre-sentence

investigation report (“PSIR”), which he asserts was part of the state court record. To

the extent that Petitioner asks the Court to consider the PSIR and other information

that was actually part of the state court record, his request for reconsideration is

granted. To the extent that Petitioner asks the Court to consider medical records or

any other information that was not itself part of the state court record, his request for

reconsideration is denied. The United States Supreme Court has made clear that

federal habeas review under 28 U.S.C. §2254(d) is “limited to the record that was

before the state court that adjudicated the claim on the merits.” Cullen v. Pinholster,

563 U.S. 170, 181 (2011). Accordingly, the Court grants in part and denies in part

Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration (Dkt. # 15).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S/Denise Page Hood 

Denise Page Hood

Chief Judge, United States District Court

Dated: May 24, 2016

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of

record on May 24, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/LaShawn R. Saulsberry 

Case Manager

2

2:15-cv-10687-DPH-PTM Doc # 16 Filed 05/24/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1791
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2266 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2266

 To delay for 1 year the date for compliance with certain regulations 
prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury and the Board of Governors 
  of the Federal Reserve System under subchapter IV of chapter 53 of 
                     title 31, United States Code.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 2009

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To delay for 1 year the date for compliance with certain regulations 
prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury and the Board of Governors 
  of the Federal Reserve System under subchapter IV of chapter 53 of 
                     title 31, United States Code.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reasonable Prudence in Regulation 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DELAY IN APPLICATION OF REGULATION.

    Notwithstanding any provision of part 233 of title 12, Code of 
Federal Regulations (also known as Regulation GG) or of part 132 of 
title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, jointly prescribed by the Board 
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Secretary of the 
Treasury, respectively (to implement subchapter IV of chapter 53 of 
title 31, United States Code), the date by which compliance with such 
regulations is required shall be extended from December 1, 2009, to 
December 1, 2010.
                                 <all>
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2259 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to strengthen the post-employment 

restrictions for Members of Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2009 

Ms. KOSMAS (for herself and Mr. POSEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to strengthen the 

post-employment restrictions for Members of Congress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop the Revolving 

5 Door in Washington Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. POST-EMPLOYMENT RESTRICTIONS FOR MEMBERS 

7 OF CONGRESS. 

8 Section 207(e) of title 18, United States Code, is 

9 amended by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the fol10 lowing: 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2259 IH

1 ‘‘(1) MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND ELECTED

2 OFFICERS OF THE HOUSE.— 

3 ‘‘(A) MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.—Any per4 son who is a Member of Congress and who, 

5 within 2 years after that person leaves office, 

6 knowingly makes, with the intent to influence, 

7 any communication to or appearance before any 

8 Member, officer, or employee of either House of 

9 Congress or any employee of any other legisla10 tive office of the Congress, on behalf of any 

11 other person (except the United States) in con12 nection with any matter on which such former 

13 Member of Congress seeks action by a Member, 

14 officer, or employee of either House of Con15 gress, in his or her official capacity, shall be 

16 punished as provided in section 216 of this title. 

17 ‘‘(B) OFFICERS OF THE HOUSE.—Any per18 son who is an elected officer of the House of 

19 Representatives and who, within 1 year after 

20 that person leaves office, knowingly makes, with 

21 the intent to influence, any communication to 

22 or appearance before any Member, officer, or 

23 employee of the House of Representatives, on 

24 behalf of any other person (except the United 

25 States) in connection with any matter on which 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2259 IH

1 such former elected officer seeks action by a 

2 Member, officer, or employee of either House of 

3 Congress, in his or her official capacity, shall be 

4 punished as provided in section 216 of this 

5 title.’’. 

6 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

7 The amendment made by section 1 shall apply to in8 dividuals who leave office or employment to which such 

9 amendments apply on or after the date of the enactment 

10 of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Bobby Yazdani, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Saba Software, Inc. (the
Company) hereby certify, as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: January 12, 2007



By:

/s/ BOBBY YAZDANIBobby YazdaniChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
###### Editorial Note on Part 164

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 164.009-23 Factory inspection.

The Coast Guard does not inspect noncombustible materials approved under this subpart on a regular schedule. However, the Commander of the Coast Guard District in which a factory is located may detail a marine inspector at any time to visit a factory where a noncombustible material is manufactured to conduct an inspection of the manufacturing and quality control procedures and to select representative samples of the material for examination or tests to verify that the material is as stated in the original application for approval. The manufacturer is advised in advance of the time of testing samples selected and may witness the tests upon request.