alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011130EN.01002502.xml

| 30.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/25

---

Action brought on 14 March 2011 — Robe v Council

(Case T-147/11)

2011/C 130/51

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gogo Joachim Robe (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) (represented by: G. Collard, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, concerning the applicant, Mr Gogo Joachim ROBE, Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011, published on 15 January 2011 in the Official Journal of the European Union, are not justified in fact, |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, concerning the applicant, Mr Gogo Joachim ROBE, Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011, published on 15 January 2011 in the Official Journal of the European Union, are not justified in fact,

| — | consequently,






  — | annul Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

consequently,

—

annul Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011;

| — | alternatively, order that the name of Mr Gogo Joachim ROBE be removed from the lists annexed to that regulation and to that decision. |
| --- | --- |

—

alternatively, order that the name of Mr Gogo Joachim ROBE be removed from the lists annexed to that regulation and to that decision.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments raised by the applicant are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-137/11 Guiai Bi Poin v Council.

Guiai Bi Poin

Council

---
EXHIBIT 10.33



 











Exhibit 10.33




THIRD AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT OF

MARK G. KACHUR




     This Third Amendment to Employment Agreement of Mark G. Kachur, effective nunc pro tunc
November 30, 2004, hereby amends the Employment Agreement, dated December 1, 2000, entered into
by Mark G. Kachur and CUNO Incorporated, as follows:




     Paragraph 1 is deleted in its entirety and is replaced with new Paragraph 1 as follows:




1. Employment, Contract Period. During the period specified in this Section 1, the Company
shall employ Executive, and Executive shall serve the Company, on the term and subject to
the conditions set forth herein. The term of Executive’s employment hereunder shall
commence as of December 1, 2000 (the “Effective Date”) and, subject to prior termination as
provided in Section 6 hereof, shall continue through June 1, 2005 (the “Expiration Date”).
The term of Executive’s employment hereunder is sometimes hereinafter referred to as the
“Contract Period.”




Paragraph 3(a) is deleted in its entirety and is replaced with new Paragraph 3(a) as follows:



(a) Base Salary. The Corporation shall pay Executive a base salary at an annual rate of not less
than $550,000 paid at least on a monthly basis. The annual rate of base salary may be increased at
the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Committee”). If increased, the
annual rate of base salary may not thereafter be decreased during the term of this Agreement.




Paragraph 3(b), is deleted in its entirety and is replaced with new Paragraph 3(b), as
follows:




     (b) Annual Incentive Compensation. The Corporation may pay Executive an annual bonus
under the provisions of the Company’s Management Incentive Plan and the Executive Management
Incentive Plan or any successor plans but only if and when authorized by the Committee. The
Executive’s combined annual incentive compensation target shall be 100% of his base salary.




The following is added to the end of Paragraph 3(c), as amended:




The Company
shall grant to Executive, on January 17, 2005, a total of 18,228 restricted shares of the Company’s Common Stock pursuant to the Company’s 1996 Stock Incentive Plan,
and, subject to the conditions of the restriction, such shares shall vest December 1, 2008.



     The remainder of the Employment Agreement, unaffected by this Third Amendment, shall remain in
full force and effect.



 









 





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Third Amendment to Employment Agreement of Mark
G. Kachur, effective nunc pro tunc November 30, 2004.

	 	 	 
	
EXECUTIVE
	 	CUNO INCORPORATED
	 	 	 
	
/s/ Mark G. Kachur


MARK G. KACHUR
	 	/s/ John A. Tomich


JOHN A. TOMICH

General Counsel and Secretary
	
January 14, 2005
	 	January 14, 2005
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending June 10, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
# C_2019187EN.01005701.xml

| 3.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/57

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 April 2019 — Deutsche Post v Commission

(Case T-388/11) (1)

(State aid - Postal services - Funding of additional salary and social costs relating to some of the staff of Deutsche Post by means of subsidies and revenue generated by remuneration for price-regulated services - Decision to extend the formal investigation procedure - Decision finding that there was new aid at the end of the preliminary investigation phase - Action for annulment - Challengeable act - Interest in bringing proceedings - Admissibility - Consequences of the annulment of the final decision - Obligation to state reasons)

(2019/C 187/60)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Post AG (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: J. Sedemund, T. Lübbig and M. Klasse, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Grespan, T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: UPS Europe SPRL/BVBA, formerly UPS Europe NV/SA (Brussels, Belgium); and United Parcel Service Deutschland Sàrl & Co. OHG, formerly UPS Deutschland Inc. & Co. OHG (Neuss, Germany) (represented initially by T. Ottervanger and E. Henny, and subsequently by T. Ottervanger and R. Wojtek, lawyers)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2011) 3081 final of 10 May 2011 extending the formal investigation procedure laid down in Article 108(2) TFEU on State aid C 36/07 (ex NN 25/07) granted by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of Deutsche Post, a summary of which has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ 2011 C 263, p. 4).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the plea of inadmissibility; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the plea of inadmissibility;

| 2) | Annuls Commission Decision C(2011) 3081 final of 10 May 2011 extending the formal investigation procedure laid down in Article 108(2) TFEU on State aid C 36/07 (ex NN 25/07) granted by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of Deutsche Post; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Annuls Commission Decision C(2011) 3081 final of 10 May 2011 extending the formal investigation procedure laid down in Article 108(2) TFEU on State aid C 36/07 (ex NN 25/07) granted by the Federal Republic of Germany in favour of Deutsche Post;

| 3) | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and those incurred by Deutsche Post AG; |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and those incurred by Deutsche Post AG;

| 4) | Orders UPS Europe SPRL/BVBA and United Parcel Service Deutschland Sàrl & Co. OHG each to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4)

Orders UPS Europe SPRL/BVBA and United Parcel Service Deutschland Sàrl & Co. OHG each to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 80 (Thursday, April 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20911-20912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2054]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Second Meeting, Special Committee 213 Enhanced Flight Vision 
Systems/Synthetic Vision System (EFVS/SVS)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 213, Enhanced Flight Vision 
Systems/Synthetic Vision System (EFVS/SVS).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
second meeting of RTCA Special Committee 213, Enhanced Flight Vision 
Systems/Synthetic Vision System (EFVS/SVS).

DATES: The meeting will be held May 22-24, 2007 from 9 a.m.-5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org for directions.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 213 meeting. The agenda will 
include:
    <bullet> May 22:
    <bullet> Opening Plenary Session (Welcome, Introductions, and 
Administrative Remarks, Agenda Review).
    <bullet> Review SC-213 Objectives, Action Items, and SC-213 Web 
site and document content.
    <bullet> Review initial reports from WG 1, and WG 2, and status of 
WG 3 for helicopters.
    <bullet> SVS/EVS Technology update.
    <bullet> Afternoon: WG 1 and WG 2 meeting for task assignments.
    <bullet> May 23:
    <bullet> Morning: Continued WG 1 and WG 2 task assignment.
    <bullet> Afternoon: Establish date/place for next meeting.
    <bullet> Review action items and define next steps/task for MASPS 
development.
    <bullet> May 24 a.m.:
    <bullet> WG 1 meeting.
    <bullet> WG 2 meeting.

[[Page 20912]]

    <bullet> Closing Plenary Session (Other Business, Establish Agenda, 
Adjourn).
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 18, 2007.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 07-2054 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

PARTS CLEANING TECHNOLOGIES 

OF ILLINOIS, INC., et al., 

 Plaintiffs, Case No. 15-cv-10657 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

THOMAS LISOTA, et al., 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________/ 

ORDER TO PERSONALLY APPEAR AT STATUS CONFERENCE 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties and their counsel shall 

personally appear at the United States District Court, Theodore Levin U.S. 

Courthouse, 231 W. Lafayette Blvd., Room 1013, Detroit, Michigan, on Monday, 

September 26, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. for a status conference before the Honorable 

Matthew F. Leitman.

       s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: September 2, 2016 

2:15-cv-10657-MFL-MKM Doc # 29 Filed 09/02/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 394
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on September 2, 2016, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113

2:15-cv-10657-MFL-MKM Doc # 29 Filed 09/02/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 395
Opinion issued October 2, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00451-CV

———————————

IN RE S. C. MAXWELL FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, LTD., Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, S.C. Maxwell Family Partnership, LTD., has filed a petition for writ 

of mandamus challenging the trial court’s order denying relator’s motion to 

transfer venue in the underlying case.* We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Massengale, Brown, and Huddle.

 

*

The underlying case is Thomas Kent and Nancy Kent v. S.C. Maxwell Family 

Partnership, LTD., cause number 35517, pending in the 335th District Court of 

Washington County, Texas, the Honorable Carson Campbell presiding.
* District Judge of the Central District of Illinois, sitting

by designation.

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 01-10144

_____________________

JOHN TRICKETT,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

A. G. EDWARDS & SONS INC.; ET AL.,

Defendants,

A. G. EDWARDS & SONS INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:98-CV-2912-M

_________________________________________________________________

January 11, 2002

Before JOLLY and PARKER, Circuit Judges, and MILLS,* District

Judge.

PER CURIAM:**

We have reviewed the record and studied the briefs in this

case, and we find no reversible error. Although we think that the

district court erred in setting aside the jury’s determination that

Trickett ratified A.G. Edwards’ conduct, this error makes no

difference in the ultimate judgment. The jury determined that
2

Trickett’s claim under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act

(“DTPA”), TEX. BUS. & COM. CODE ANN. § 17.46, formed an independent

basis for the award of damages and attorneys’ fees. Because

ratification does not provide a defense to a DTPA claim, the

failure of Trickett’s negligence and fiduciary breach claims based

on the jury’s finding of ratification does not affect the amount of

the final award and consequently does not require a reversal of the

district court’s judgment.

We also conclude that the evidence, viewed in the light most

favorable to Trickett, supports the jury’s finding that A.G.

Edwards did not provide Trickett with a level of expertise

consistent with Lanier Lafitte’s representations. The district

court therefore correctly held that the jury’s finding of a DTPA

violation is adequately supported in the record.

Finally, we find no principle of Texas law that precludes the

damage award in this case, which essentially provided a remedy to

make Trickett whole. Thus, under the circumstances of this case,

the district court did not err in allowing the jury to base its

award on the value of the shares that Trickett was forced to sell

to pay the cost of exercising the options, measured at the time of

the trial. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-39777 and 333-39779)  pertaining to the 1996 Equity Incentive
Plan and the 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and in the Registration Statement
(Form S-4 No.  333-53421) and related  Prospectus,  of our report dated July 17,
1998 with  respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and  schedule of
Arterial Vascular  Engineering,  Inc., included in the Annual Report, as amended
for the year ended June 30, 1998.


                                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Palo Alto, California
November 6, 1998
#### § 184.702 Pollution prevention equipment and procedures.

A vessel must comply with the applicable design, equipment, personnel, procedures, and record requirements of 33 CFR parts 151, 155, and 156.
EXHIBIT 10.16


Summary of Loan  Agreement by and between  Shenzhen BAK Battery Co.,  Ltd.  (the
"Company") and Shenzhen Branch,  Industrial Bank ("Industrial Bank") dated as of
March 11, 2004.

         The contract  number for this agreement is Xingyin Shen Yewu Sanjian Zi
2004 No. 003.  The contract  term is March 11, 2004 to March 11,  2005,  and the
amount of credit to be extended by Industrial  Bank is RMB  20,000,000  Yuan. In
the event of breach of contract,  the agreement  provides for the  correction of
such breach of contract within a certain period of time,  preventing the Company
from drawing on the loan,  termination of the agreement,  the payment of overdue
and compound interest and the payment of litigation fees.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-03267, 333-19095, 333-33043, 333-33045 on Form S-8 and 333-33057, 333-33061
on Form S-3 of DecisionOne Holdings Corp. of our reports dated August 15, 1997
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A1 of DecisionOne Holdings
Corp. and DecisionOne Corporation for the year ended June 30, 1997.


Deloitte & Touche LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
October 8, 1997
Reference Number 

5884186PS0388W6YM 

0544400060ZLV72VL 

854338203FS8000Z5 

55541860705RDYDOX 

554328608008VV90MO 

054830709L YM RPT4L 

564891561545KOSHD 

841517877845AKOJ10 

895848561561894KOH 

1871556189456SAMKL 

1542202074TWWZV48 

2564894185189LKDFID 

4545754784KOHUIOS 

2564561023184102315 

14547847586KDDL564 

55542818705RASDOX 

289189194ASDS8744 

178105417841045784 

045148714518979874 

8456152156181SDSA 

31289105205648AWD 

04518478415615ASD 

0547810544898718AF 

05648941 32168480 P 

054894561564ASDW 

5648974891AD98156 

Trans Date 

2/22 

2/24 

2/25 

2/25 

2/25 

2/25 

2/25 

2/25 

2/26 

2/26 

2/26 

2/27 

2/27 

2/28 

2/28 

3/1 

3/1 

3/2 

3/4 

3/5 

3/11 

3/11 

3/15 

3/16 

3/17 

3/19 

Post Date 

2/23 

2/25 

2/25 

2/26 

2/26 

2/26 

2/26 

2/26 

2/27 

2/27 

2/26 

2/28 

3/1 

3/1 

2/28 

3/2 

3/3 

3/4 

3/5 

3/6 

3/12 

3/16 

3/17 

3/17 

3/18 

3/20 

Description of Transaction or Credit 

Store #1 

Store #2 

Pymt Thank You 

Store #3 

Store #4 

Store #5 

Store #6 

Store #7 

Store #8 

Store #9 

Cash Advance 

Store #10 

Balance Transfer 

Store #11 

Cash Advance 

Store #12 

Store #13 

Store #14 

Store #13 

Store #15 

Store #16 

Store #17 

Store #18 

Store #19 

Store #20 

Store #21 

Amount 

$2.05 

$12.11 

$450.00­

$4.63 

$114.95 

$7.35 

$14.35 

$40.35 

$27.68 

$124.76 

$121.50 

$32.87 

$785.00 

$14.76 

$196.50 

$3.76 

$13.45 

$2.35 

$13.45­

$25.00 

$7.34 

$10.56 

$24.50 

$8.76 

$14.23 

$23.76 

I Fees 

9525156489SFD4545Q 2/23 2/23 Late Fee $35.00 

564156156470JSNDS 2/26 2/26 Cash Advance Fee $5.00 

84151564SADS8745H 2/27 2/27 Balance Transfer Fee $23.55 

256489156189451516L 2/28 2/28 Cash Advance Fee $5.90 

TOTAL FEES FOR THIS PERIOD $69.45 

Interest Charged 

Interest Charge on Purchases $6.31 

Interest Charge on Cash Advances $4.58 

TOTAL INTEREST FOR THIS PERIOD $10.89 

G-18(A) Periodic Statement Transactions; Interest Char2es; Fees Sample 

Transactions

2012 Totals Year-to-Date 

Total fees charged in 2012 $90.14 


Total interest charged in 2012 $18.27
## Run of EPA's NONROAD model for recreational marine Date of run: 8/6/2015

yearid monthid dayid pollutantidfueltype sector scc US tons of fuel/day days in month Tons per day US tons of fuel/month 2015 1 2 99 1 11'2282010005' 4,887 31 1,396 2015 1 5 99 1 11'2282010005' 838 31 598 61,841 2015 2 2 99 1 11'2282010005' 5,411 28 1,546 2015 2 5 99 1 11'2282010005' 928 28 663 61,841 2015 3 2 99 1 11'2282010005' 24,437 31 6,982 2015 3 5 99 1 11'2282010005' 4,189 31 2,992 309,206 2015 4 2 99 1 11'2282010005' 25,252 30 7,215 2015 4 5 99 1 11'2282010005' 4,329 30 3,092 309,206 2015 5 2 99 1 11'2282010005' 24,437 31 6,982 2015 5 5 99 1 11'2282010005' 4,189 31 2,992 309,206 2015 6 2 99 1 11'2282010005' 73,813 30 21,089 2015 6 5 99 1 11'2282010005' 12,654 30 9,038 903,832 2015 7 2 99 1 11'2282010005' 71,432 31 20,409 2015 7 5 99 1 11'2282010005' 12,245 31 8,747 903,832 2015 8 2 99 1 11'2282010005' 71,432 31 20,409 2015 8 5 99 1 11'2282010005' 12,245 31 8,747 903,832 2015 9 2 99 1 11'2282010005' 25,252 30 7,215 2015 9 5 99 1 11'2282010005' 4,329 30 3,092 309,206 2015 10 2 99 1 11'2282010005' 24,437 31 6,982 2015 10 5 99 1 11'2282010005' 4,189 31 2,992 309,206 2015 11 2 99 1 11'2282010005' 25,252 30 7,215 2015 11 5 99 1 11'2282010005' 4,329 30 3,092 309,206 2015 12 2 99 1 11'2282010005' 4,887 31 1,396 2015 12 5 99 1 11'2282010005' 838 31 598 61,841

4,752,254tons
Density of gasoline 0.733 g/cm3 Based on 2014 Alliance survey data

1,553,770,804 gallons
EXHIBIT 99.1

                               TALK VISUAL CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Talk Visual  Corporation (the "Company") Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harley L. Rollins,
Chief  Executive  Offer and Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1). The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2). The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: March 28, 2003         By:      /s/ HARLEY L. ROLLINS
                                      ---------------------------
                                          Harley L. Rollins
                                          Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Chief Financial Officer