alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### JOSEPH KENNEDY ET AL., PARTNERS, ETC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. PETER GOD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Submitted May term, 1929

Decided June 21, 1929.

*583Before Justices Pabkek, Black and Bodike.

For the plaintiffs-respondents, *Simon Bnglander.*

For the defendant-appellant, *Harry L. Brittingham*and *George D. Mulligan.*

Pee Curiam.

This suit was brought in the First District Court of Newark. The state of demand sets up a contract made August 30th, 1928, between the parties to furnish and install the following forced draft equipment, viz.: “Two [2] 600 Essex blowers with two [2] automatic boiler controls at No. 459 High St., Newark, N. J.; which I agree to pay six hundred [$G00] dollars, to be paid in live equal monthly payments, first payment Oct. loth. Discount 10%.” “The Essex Coal Economies Company guarantees that when the above equipment is installed, it will be *mechanically*perfect.” The plaintiffs completed the contract and waives any excess over $500. The plaintiffs before installing examined the premises and advised the size and style of blower to be installed. The trial court found there was nothing the matter with the blowers, and that under normal conditions they worked all right, but the complaint arose from the fact the defendant had not informed the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs had failed to discover for themselves that at the base of the chimney into which the flue from the blowers led, there was an incinerator, which was in operation part of the time, and when so operating with the blowers made them work unsatisfactorily. The trial of the case by the court without a jury resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for $500. We concur in the result reached by the trial court and agree with the .reasons therefore given by Judge MacMahon in the memorandum filed by him. The judgment of the First District Court of Newark is therefore affirmed, with costs.
§ 170.290 Free surface correction for damage stability calculations. ( a ) When doing the damage stability calculations required by this subchapter, the virtual increase in the vessel's vertical center of gravity due to liquids in tanks must be determined by calculating— ( 1 ) For each type of consumable liquid, the free surface effect of at least one transverse pair of wing tanks or a single centerline tank; and
( 2 ) The free surface effect of each partially filled tank containing other than consumable liquids.
( b ) For the purpose of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the tank or combination of tanks selected must be those having the greatest free surface effect.
( c ) When doing the calculations in paragraph (a) of this section, the free surface effect of a liquid in a tank must be determined by— ( 1 ) Assuming the vessel is heeled five degrees from the vertical; or
( 2 ) Calculating the shift of the center of gravity of the liquid in the tank by the moment of transference method.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Michael Martini, Chief Financial Officer of Saba Software, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertify, as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. 

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,“filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

Date: October 10, 2007
§ 169.721 Storm sails and halyards (exposed and partially protected waters only). ( a ) Unless clearly unsuitable, each vessel must have one storm trysail of appropriate size. It must be sheeted independently of the boom and must have neither headboard nor battens.
( b ) Each vessel having headsails must also have one storm head sail of appropriate size and strength.
( c ) Each vessel must have at least two halyards, each capable of hoisting a sail.
Skip to content

Search ETA

Subscribe to E-mail Updates

UNITED STATESDEPARTMENT OF LABOR

A to ZSite MapFAQsFormsAbout DOLContact UsEspañol

        - About ETA
        - Find Job &        Career Info
        - Business &        Industry
        - Workforce        Professionals
        - Grants &        Contracts
        - ETA Library
        - Foreign Labor        Certification
        - Performance        & Results
        - Regions &        States

 Email this page
 Email this page

 ETA Home

About OPDRLegislation & Regulations        - Legislation
        - Regulations
        - ETA Advisories
Research        - Publication Database
        - Publication Order Form
        - 5 Year Research Plan
        - Research Conferences

Acrobat ReaderAdobe's PDF-to-HTML conversion tool

# ETA Research Publication Database

The research Publication Database provides access to a collection of research and evaluation reports commissioned by ETA to help guide the workforce invesment system in administring effective programs that have at their core the goals of enhanced employement opportunity and business. Please see the How To Receive Copies of Printed Publications section below to request hardcopy publications. Hard copies, if available, can also be requested from the abstract page.

**Search        :  ****Advanced Search**

View the Complete List of Research Publications

Public Use Datasets
            - Public Workforce System Dataset
            - Workforce Investment Act (WIA) Net Impact Evaluation Dataset
            - Project GATE (Growing America Through Entrepreneurship) Final Evaluation Dataset

How to Request Copies of Printed Publications

You may request to receive a hard copy of certain publications, when available, by any of the following methods
            - Request publications online using the:  ETA Publication Order Form
            - Written requests using the  ETA Hardcopy Publication Order Form  should be mailed to:     Division of Policy, Legislation and Regulation          Office of Policy Development and Research          Employment and Training Administration          U.S. Department of Labor          200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.          Room N-5641          Washington, D.C. 20210 
            - Contact the publication order line at: (202) 693-3666

Freedom of Information ActPrivacy & Security StatementDisclaimersCustomer SurveyImportant Web Site Notices

**Employment and Training Administration** www.doleta.govContact Us
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49223, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60144, Sept. 30, 2013.

§ 2.01-1 Applications for inspections. ( a ) *Application forms.* ( 1 ) Applications for inspections of vessels required to be inspected under subtitle II, title 46 of the U.S. Code, title 46 and title 33 U.S. Code, or under 50 U.S.C. 198 shall be made by the master, owner, or agent on the following Coast Guard forms which are obtainable from the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, at any local U.S. Coast Guard Sector Office. ( i ) CG-3752—Application for Inspection of U.S. Vessel.
( ii ) CG-986—Application for Inspection of Foreign Vessel.
( 2 ) These applications require information on name and type of vessel, nature of employment and route in which to be operated, and place where and date when the vessel may be inspected.
( b ) *To whom submitted.* The completed form must be submitted to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, in the Marine Inspection Zone within which the inspection is to be conducted.
( c ) *New vessels.* Applications for inspection of new vessels must be preceded by the submission of applicable drawings or prints in accordance with the specific requirements in subchapters D (Tank Vessels), E (Load Lines), F (Marine Engineering), H (Passenger Vessels), I (Cargo and Miscellaneous Vessels), J (Electrical Engineering), K (Small Passenger Vessels Carrying More Than 150 Passengers Or With Overnight Accommodations For More Than 49 Passengers), L (Offshore Supply Vessels), O (Certain Bulk Dangerous Cargoes), S (Subdivision and Stability), and T (Small Passenger Vessels) of this chapter applicable to that particular type of vessel or type of service in which the vessel is proposed to be operated.
( d ) *Foreign-built vessels.* ( 1 ) Those foreign-built vessels which are specifically authorized by public or private laws to engage in the coastwise trade, and those foreign-built vessels which are documented to engage in the foreign trade shall be inspected and certificated as required by law and/or the regulations in this chapter which are applicable to their class and employment.
( 2 ) Foreign-built vessels are not permitted to engage in the U.S. coastwise trade (domestic trade) unless specifically authorized by law. Therefore, when foreign-built vessels are intended for use in the coastwise trade as defined by the U.S. Customs Service, such vessels will not be inspected and certificated unless specifically authorized by law to engage in coastwise trade.
[CG870FR 65-50, 30 FR 16604, Dec. 30, 1965, as amended by CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51006, Nov. 4, 1983; CGD 91-030, 60 FR 13563, Mar. 13, 1995; CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51041, Sept. 30, 1997; CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51194, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36329, July 2, 2007]
§ 189.35-5 Tests. ( a ) An installation load test and safety assessment shall be conducted by the owner or operator. Section 189.35-13 may be used as a guide for the safety assessment. It shall be the responsibility of the owner or operator to notify the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, of the time and place of the installation tests when occurring in a port of the United States to permit a marine inspector to witness the tests if desired. Subsequent owner or operator conducted tests may be required at the time of the vessel's inspection periods if a visual examination or review of the equipment record reveals evidence of an unsafe condition. Tests should normally consist of exercising the equipment as a unit with a proof load 25 percent in excess of the equipment's normal working load, however manufacturer's design limitations should not be exceeded. Consideration shall be given to the plans of loading when conducting these tests. Braking, safety and limiting devices shall be tested whenever feasible.
# C_2013114EN.01002102.xml

| 20.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/21

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 February 2013 — Ellinika Nafpigia AE v European Commission

(Case C-246/12 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - State aid - Shipbuilding - Decision declaring aid measures incompatible with the common market - Protection of the essential interests of national security - Competition conditions in the internal market)

2013/C 114/31

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Ellinika Nafpigia AE (represented by: I. Drosos and V. Karagiannis, dikigori)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Urraca Caviedes and M. Konstantinidis, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 March 2012 in Case T-391/08 Ellinika Nafpigia v Commission dismissing an action for the partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 3118 final of 2 July 2008 declaring incompatible with the common market aid granted by the Greek authorities in favour of Ellinika Nafpigia (Hellenic Shipyards ‘HSY’), in the context of amendments to the initial investment plan relating to the restructuring of that shipyard (State aid C 16/2004 (ex NN 29/2004, CP 71/2002 and CP 133/2005))

Ellinika Nafpigia

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Ellinika Nafpigia AE to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ellinika Nafpigia AE to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 200, 7.7.2012.

1

---
#### § 27.102 Incorporation by reference.

(a) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register—in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce any edition other than that specified in paragraph (b) of this section, the Coast Guard must publish notice of the change in the Federal Register and make the material available for inspection. All approved material is available at the Coast Guard Headquarters. Contact Commandant (CG-ENG), Attn: Office of Design and Engineering Systems, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509. The material is also available from the sources indicated in paragraph (b) of this section, or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.*

(b) The material approved for incorporation by reference in this part and the sections affected are:

| American Boat and Yacht Council (ABYC), 613 Third Street, Suite 10, Annapolis, MD 21403 | |
| --- | --- |
| H-25-1986—Portable Fuel Systems for Flammable Liquids | 27.211 |
| H-33-1989—Diesel Fuel Systems | 27.211 |
| National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02269-9101 | |
| NFPA 302-1998—Fire Protection Standard for Pleasure, and Commercial Motorcraft | 27.211 |
| NFPA 750—Standard on Water Mist Fire Protection Systems, 2003 edition | 27.101 |
| NFPA 2001—Standard on Clean Agent Fire Extinguishing Systems, 2000 edition | 27.101 |
| Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001 | |
| SAE J1475-1984—Hydraulic Hose Fitting for Marine Applications | 27.211 |
| SAE J1942-1989—Hose and Hose Assemblies for Marine Applications | 27.211 |

[USCG-2000-6931, 69 FR 34069, June 18, 2004, as amended by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49226, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2010-0759, 75 FR 60002, Sept. 29, 2010; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60146, Sept. 30, 2013]
# C_2013171EN.01000901.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie van België — Belgium) — Rose Marie Bark v Galileo Joint Undertaking, in liquidation

(Case C-89/12) (1)

1

(Joint undertakings - Contracts concluded with members of staff - Applicable rules - Regulation (EC) No 876/2002)

2013/C 171/15

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van Cassatie van België

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Rose Marie Bark

Applicant:

Defendant: Galileo Joint Undertaking, in liquidation

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Hof van Cassatie van België — Interpretation of Article 11(2), of the Statutes of the Galileo Joint Undertaking, set out in the annex to Council Regulation (EC) No 876/2002 of 21 May 2002 setting up the Galileo Joint Undertaking (OJ 2002 L 138, p. 1) — Fixed-term contracts concluded with members of staff — Contracts based on ‘employment of other staff of the European Communities’ — Mandatory provisions of the Staff Regulations on the conditions for compensation

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 11(2) of the Statutes of the Galileo Joint Undertaking, set out in the annex to Council Regulation (EC) No 876/2002 of 21 May 2002 setting up the Galileo Joint Undertaking, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1943/2006 of 12 December 2006 must be interpreted as meaning that the conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities and, in particular, the salary rates defined therein, do not apply to members of staff of Galileo who have fixed-term contracts.

---

(1)  OJ C 133, 5.5.2012.

1

---
EXHIBIT 99.18

CONSENT OF EXPERT

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the Form
40-F) of Cameco Corporation (the Corporation) to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

I hereby consent to reference to my name and my involvement in the preparation of, or supervision of the preparation of, scientific and
technical information in the following instances:



| | (a) | under the headings Operations and Projects  Uranium Operating Properties  Inkai, Mineral Reserves and Resources  and Governance  Interest of Experts in the
Corporations Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2016 dated March 23, 2017 for the Inkai property; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | under the headings Our Operations and Projects  Uranium Operating Properties  Inkai and Mineral Reserves and Resources in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation for the year ended December 31, 2016 dated February 9, 2017 for the Inkai property,
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(collectively the Technical Information) in the Form 40-F, and to the inclusion and incorporation by
reference of information derived from the Technical Information in the Form 40-F.

I also hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of such Technical Information in the registration statements (Nos. 333-11736, 333-6180 and
333-139165) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Stock Option Plan, registration statement (No. 333-196422) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Employee Share Ownership Plan and registration statement (No. 333-200678) on Form F-10.

Sincerely,



|                    |  |                                                                           
|------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Stuart B. Soliz
|Name:               |  | Stuart B. Soliz, P. Geo.                                                  
|Title:              |  | Principal Geologist, Power Resources, Inc. (operating as Cameco Resources)

Date: March 23, 2017
# C_2011347EN.01004406.xml

| 26.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/44

---

Order of the General Court of 11 October 2011 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — BA&SH (ba&sh)

(Case T-23/11) (1)

1

2011/C 347/82

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  C 80, 12.3.2011.

1

---
#### § 308.503 Rate schedules.

Rate schedules published by the Maritime Administrator may be obtained from an underwriting agent. All rate schedules are subject to change by the Maritime Administrator at any time without notice. If no rate is published for a voyage on which war risk coverage is available, the Maritime Administrator will name a rate through an underwriting agent upon application.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**Exchange
      Act Rule 15d-14(b) and**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      of Astrata Group Incorporated (the ”Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period
      ending August 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on
      the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas A. Wagner, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to
      Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:





i.
            The
                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act 1934;
                and





ii.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








A
      signed original of this written
      statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
      acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
      within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
      906,
      has been provided to Astrata Group Incorporated and will be retained by Astrata
      Group Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.





Dated:
                  October 12, 2007
              /s/THOMAS
                  A. WAGNER
 Name:
        Thomas A. Wagner
 Title:
        Chief Financial Officer
§ 298.22 Amortization of Obligations. ( a ) Generally, after delivery or completion of Shipyard Project, and until maturity of the Obligations, provisions of the Trust Indenture or other part of the Documentation require you to make periodic payment of principal and interest on the Obligations.
( b ) Usually, the payment of principal (amortization) must be made semi-annually, but in no event less frequently than on an annual basis, and in either case the amortization must be in equal payments of principal (level principal), unless MARAD approves the periodic payment of a constant aggregate amount, comprised of both interest and principal components that are variable in amount (level payment). No other method of amortization will be allowed that would reduce the amount of periodic amortization below that determined under the level principal or level payment basis at any time prior to maturity of the obligations, except where a third-party expert approved or engaged by MARAD conducts an independent analysis and review of a project and structure of an obligation and demonstrates that such other method is in the best interests of the United States.
[65 FR 45152, July 20, 2000, as amended at 67 FR 61282, Sept. 30, 2002; 88 FR 86612, Dec. 14, 2023]
§ 169.677 Equipment protection and enclosure. ( a ) Except as provided in this section, all electrical equipment including motors, generators, controllers, distribution panels, consoles, etc., must be at least dripproof and protected.
( b ) Equipment mounted on a hinged door of an enclosure must be constructed or shielded so that no live parts of the door mounted equipment will be exposed to accidental contact by a person with the door open and the circuit energized.
( c ) Any cabinet, panel, or box containing more than one source of potential in excess of 50 volts must be fitted with a sign warning personnel of this condition and identifying the circuits to be disconnected to remove all the potentials in excess of 50 volts.
( d ) Each distribution panelboard must be enclosed.