alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012065EN.01002301.xml

| 3.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/23

---

Action brought on 2 December 2011 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-131/11)

2012/C 65/42

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers,)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision to transfer pension rights acquired before entry into service with the Commission on the basis of the recalculated proposal of the PMO

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 15 June 2011 annulling and replacing the proposal for transfer of the applicant’s pension rights in the context of his request under Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations, which comprises a new proposal calculated on the basis of the GIP adopted on 3 March 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 15 June 2011 annulling and replacing the proposal for transfer of the applicant’s pension rights in the context of his request under Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations, which comprises a new proposal calculated on the basis of the GIP adopted on 3 March 2011;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

Versata Software, Inc., f/k/a Trilogy 

Software, Inc., Versata Development 

Group, Inc., and Trilogy, Inc., 

 Plaintiffs

v. 

Ford Motor Company, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 15-10628-MFL-EAS 

(consolidated with Case No. 15-cv-11624) 

Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

ORDER GRANTING FORD’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO 

TAKE DE BENE ESSE DEPOSITION OF MR. MARTIN PIPOLY 

Upon review and consideration of Ford Motor Company’s Unopposed Motion 

for Leave to take de bene esse deposition of Mr. Martin Pipoly, the Court GRANTS 

the motion. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Ford’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to 

Take de bene esse Deposition of Mr. Martin Pipoly is GRANTED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

/s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: September 1, 2022 

Case 2:15-cv-10628-MFL-EAS ECF No. 894, PageID.59636 Filed 09/01/22 Page 1 of 2
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on September 1, 2022, by electronic means and/or ordinary 

mail. 

 s/Holly A. Ryan 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5126

Case 2:15-cv-10628-MFL-EAS ECF No. 894, PageID.59637 Filed 09/01/22 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

**OF**

**WORLD FINANCIALNETWORK NATIONAL BANK, AS SERVICER OF**

**WORLD FINANCIALNETWORK CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST**

 

This certification is provided pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the annual reporton Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the “Form 10-K”) of WorldFinancial Network Credit Card Master Trust (the “Registrant”).

 

I,  Ivan Szeftel, the Chief Executive Officer of the Servicer of theRegistrant certify that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(i) the Form 10-K fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

 

(ii) the information contained in the Form10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| Dated:   March 31, 2003 |                                    |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                         |                                    |
|                         |  /s/  Ivan Szeftel                 |   |
|                         | Name: Ivan Szeftel                      |
|                         | Chief Executive Officer of the Servicer |

 

 

Subscribed and sworn to before me

this 31st day of March, 2003.

 

 
| /s/ Notary             |   |
|------------------------|--------|
| Name:                  |
| Title: Notary Public   |
| My commission expires: |

 

----
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of and for the period covered by this Report.
 Dated:  May 14, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Mark S. AllioMark S. AllioChairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive OfficerDated:  May 14, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Therese Ann LiutkusTherese Ann Liutkus, CPATreasurer and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2288 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 399
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2288

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2010

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend Public Law 106-392 to maintain annual base funding for the 
Upper Colorado and San Juan fish recovery programs through fiscal year 
                                 2023.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Endangered Fish Recovery Programs 
Improvement Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF FISH RECOVERY PROGRAMS.

    Section 3(d)(2) of Public Law 106-392 (114 Stat. 1604 and 1605) is 
amended by inserting at the end the following: ``For fiscal years 2012 
through 2023, there are hereby authorized to be appropriated such sums 
as may be necessary to provide for the annual base funding for the 
Recovery Implementation Programs above and beyond the continued use of 
power revenues to fund the operation and maintenance of capital 
projects and monitoring.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 18, 2010.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                       Calendar No. 399

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2288

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend Public Law 106-392 to maintain annual base funding for the 
Upper Colorado and San Juan fish recovery programs through fiscal year 
                                 2023.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 19, 2010

                 Read twice and placed on the calendar
```
#### First National Bank of Elmira and Elijah B. Smith, *Respondents, v.*John T. Rathbun and Newton P. Fassett, *Executors, etc., Appellants,*and John T. Rathbun.

Order of General Term, as entered by defendant, set aside as not according to decision, and order entered by plaintiff directed to stand, with ten dollars costs to plaintiff.
# C_2013336EN.01002201.xml

| 16.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/22

---

Order of the General Court of 9 September 2013 — Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria v Commission

(Case T-429/11) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - State aid - Aid scheme permitting tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and not ordering the recovery of the aid - Act entailing implementing measures - Lack of individual concern - Lack of status as an actual recipient under the aid scheme - No obligation to repay the aid - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 336/44

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, SA (Bilbao, Spain) (represented by J. Ruiz Calzado, M. Núñez Müller and J. Domínguez Pérez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by R. Lyal, C. Urraca Caviedes and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2011/282/EU of 12 January 2011 on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions No C 45/07 (ex NN 51/07, ex CP 9/07) implemented by Spain (OJ 2011 L 135, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, SA is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, SA is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.

1

---
#### § 16.115 Penalties.

Violation of this part is subject to the civil penalties set forth in 46 U.S.C. 2115. Any person who fails to implement or conduct, or who otherwise fails to comply with the requirements for chemical testing for dangerous drugs as prescribed under this part, is liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 for each violation. Each day of a continuing violation will constitute a separate violation.

[USCG-2000-7759, 66 FR 42968, Aug. 16, 2001]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-8501
LEAMON L. TATUM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION; DIVISION OF CORRECTION; RICHARD LANHAM, Commissioner, Department of Correction; WILLIAM L. SMITH, Warden, Maryland House of Correction; M. MAGWOOD, Sergeant; CHARLES WHIMS, Die tary Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA95-2362-S) Submitted: March 26, 1996 Decided: April 10, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leamon L. Tatum, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tatum v. Maryland House of Correction , No. CA-95-2362-S (D. Md. Nov. 30, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2012013EN.01001902.xml

| 14.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/19

---

Action brought on 7 November 2011 — Oetker Nahrungsmittel v OHIM (La qualité est la meilleure des recettes)

(Case T-570/11)

2012/C 13/40

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dr. August Oetker Nahrungsmittel KG (Bielefeld, Germany) (represented by: F. Graf von Stosch, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Grand Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 July 2011 in Case R 1798/2010-G; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Grand Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 July 2011 in Case R 1798/2010-G;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘La qualité est la meilleure des recettes’ for goods in Classes 16, 29, 30 and 32.

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Partial refusal of the application.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009, since the Community trade mark concerned is distinctive.

Pleas in law:

---
#### Daniel W. Travis, *Respondent, v.*Elbert P. James, Appellant.

Order affirmed, for non-submission of papers according to order of General Term.
§ 194.20-15 Chemical stores other than compressed gases. ( a ) Flammable liquids are excluded from the storeroom unless contained in properly marked and labeled metal safety cans not in excess of 5 gallons of each kind. Refer to subpart 194.05 for applicable requirements governing quantities greater than 5 gallons.
( b ) Combustible liquids in approved portable drums, barrels or containers not in excess of 55 gallons of each kind may be stored in the storeroom. Refer to subpart 194.05 for applicable requirements governing quantities greater than 55 gallons.
( c ) Containers when used for dispensing flammable and combustible liquids shall be equipped with automatic closing valves.
( d ) Poisons listed in 49 CFR part 172 may be stored in approved containers in the chemical storeroom.
( e ) Explosives and oxidizing materials not for use in the chemical laboratory shall not be stored in the chemical storeroom.
( f ) Chemical stores specifically mentioned in 49 CFR part 172 may be carried in the chemical storeroom.
[CGFR 67-83, 33 FR 1151, Jan. 27, 1968, as amended by CGD 86-033, 53 FR 36027, Sept. 16, 1988]
§ 178.320 Intact stability requirements—non-sailing vessels. ( a ) As permitted by § 178.310(c) of this part, the following vessels may undergo the simplified stability proof test detailed in § 178.330 of this part, in the presence of a Coast Guard marine inspector, if they do not have tumblehome at the deck, measured amidships, that exceeds 2 percent of the beam: ( 1 ) Monohull vessels; and
( 2 ) Flush deck catamaran vessels which are not pontoon vessels and carry not more than 49 passengers.
( b ) As permitted by § 178.310(c) of this part, a self-propelled pontoon vessel may undergo the pontoon simplified stability proof test detailed in § 178.340 of this part, in the presence of a Coast Guard marine inspector, if it satisfies all of the following requirements: ( 1 ) The vessel carries not more than 49 passengers and does not make international voyages;
( 2 ) The vessel operates on Protected Waters only;
( 3 ) The vessel is constructed with only one deck;
( 4 ) The buoyant hull volume consists of two symmetric, fully enclosed hulls;
( 5 ) The cross section of each hull is circular or of wall-sided construction without tumblehome, and constant for at least 90 percent of the length of the hull;
( 6 ) The hulls contain no machinery or tanks;
( 7 ) The portion of the deck accessible to passengers does not extend beyond— ( i ) The outboard edge of the hulls, and
( ii ) The forward or the aft end of the hulls;
( 8 ) There is no deck more than 0.15 meters (6 inches) above any point on any of the buoyant hulls;
( 9 ) The distance between the centerlines of the hulls is not less than 1.83 meters (6 feet); and
( 10 ) Each hull has a beam or diameter, as applicable, of not less than 0.61 meters (2 feet).
( c ) For a vessel that carries not more than 49 passengers, carries no deck cargo, and is otherwise eligible to undergo the simplified stability proof test detailed in § 178.330 or § 178.340 of this part, the authority issuing the stability letter may— ( 1 ) Dispense with the requirements of the simplified stability proof test in § 178.330 or § 178.340 of this part when the vessel's stability can be adequately assessed by alternate means giving due consideration to each item that impacts a vessel's stability characteristics which include, but are not limited to, the form, arrangement, construction, number of decks, route, and operating restrictions of the vessel; or
( 2 ) Authorize a change in the requirements of the simplified stability proof test in either § 178.330 or § 178.340 of this part, when necessary to adequately assess the vessel's stability.
[USCG-2007-0030, 75 FR 78088, Dec. 14, 2010]
High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS) | High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge | OPPT | US EPA

http://iaspub.epa.gov/hpvis/ServSubmissionPrint[6/15/2011 10:52:39 AM]

You are here: EPA Home Prevention, Pesticides & Toxic Substances Pollution Prevention & Toxics High

Production Volume (HPV) Challenge High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS) Submission Report

High Production Volume Information

System (HPVIS)

Contact Us Search: All EPA This Area

Submission Report

Submission Information

Submission ID :

25419498

Submission Name : 64665572 - 1H-Benzotriazole, 4or 5-methyl-, sodium

salt

AR Number : 

Chemical Information

CAS Number : 64665-57-

2

Ninth Collective Index Name : 1H-Benzotriazole, 4(or 5)-methyl-, sodium

salt

Submitter Information

Submitter's Name : Orphan

Address : 

City : 

State : VA

ZIP/Postal Code: 

Country: 

Type of Submitter : Company

Technical Point of Contact Information

Technical Point of Contact : 

Title : 

Phone Number : 

Fax Number : 

E-Mail Address : 

Additional Technical Point of Contact Information

Technical Point of Contact : 

Title : 

Phone Number : 

Fax Number : 

E-Mail Address : 

Sponsor Information

Sponsor's Name : Orphan Chemical

Address : 

City : 

State : VA

ZIP/Postal Code : 

Country : US

Phone Number : 

Share
High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS) | High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge | OPPT | US EPA

http://iaspub.epa.gov/hpvis/ServSubmissionPrint[6/15/2011 10:52:39 AM]

EPA Home Privacy and Security Notice Contact Us

http://iaspub.epa.gov/hpvis/ServSubmissionPrint

Print As-Is

Last updated on Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Fax Number : 

E-Mail Address : 

Type of Sponsor : Company

Technical Point of Contact Information

Technical Point of Contact : 

Title : 

Phone Number : 

Fax Number : 

E-Mail Address :
§ 190.10-1 Application. ( a ) The provisions of this subpart, with the exception of § 190.10-90, shall apply to all vessels other than non-self-propelled vessels of less than 300 gross tons, contracted for on or after March 1, 1968.
( b ) Vessels contracted for prior to March 1, 1968, shall meet the requirements of § 190.10-90.
( c ) Non-self-propelled vessels of less than 300 gross tons shall not be subject to the provisions of this subpart.
# C_2013344EN.01002002.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/20

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 October 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — BKK Mobil Oil Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts v Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs eV

(Case C-59/12) (1)

1

(Directive 2005/29/EC - Unfair commercial practices - Scope - Misleading information circulated by a health insurance fund which is part of the statutory social security system - Fund established as a public law body)

2013/C 344/34

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: BKK Mobil Oil Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts

Applicant:

Defendant: Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs eV

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Bundesgerichtshof — Interpretation of Article 3(1) of Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (the ‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) (OJ 2005 L 149, p. 22) in conjunction with Article 2(d) of the same directive — Scope — ‘Commercial practices’ and ‘trader’ — Advertisements of a statutory health insurance fund containing misleading information in relation to the drawbacks flowing from a potential change of health insurance fund for its clients.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (the ‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’), must be interpreted to the effect that a public law body charged with a task of public interest, such as the management of a statutory health insurance fund, falls within the persons covered by the directive.

---

(1)  OJ C 138, 12.5.2012.

1

---
§ 182.610 Main steering gear. ( a ) A vessel must be provided with a main steering gear that is: ( 1 ) Of adequate strength and capable of steering the vessel at all service speeds;
( 2 ) Designed to operate at maximum astern speed without being damaged or jammed; and
( 3 ) Capable of moving the rudder from 35 degrees on one side to 30 degrees on the other side in not more than 28 seconds with the vessel moving ahead at maximum service speed.
( b ) Control of the main steering gear, including control of any necessary associated devices (motor, pump, valve, etc.), must be provided from the operating station.
( c ) The main steering gear must be designed so that transfer from the main steering gear or control to the auxiliary means of steering required by § 182.620 can be achieved rapidly. Any tools or equipment necessary to make the transfer must be readily available.
( d ) The operating station must be arranged to permit the person steering to have the best possible all around vision.
( e ) Strong and effective rudder stops must be provided to prevent jamming and damage to the rudder and its fittings. These stops may be structural or internal to the main steering gear.
( f ) In addition to meeting the requirements of paragraphs (a) through (e) of this section, a vessel with a power driven main steering gear must be provided with the following: ( 1 ) A disconnect switch located in the steering compartment, and instantaneous short circuit protection for electrical power and control circuits sized and located in accordance with § 58.25-55(d) of this chapter. Overload protection is prohibited;
( 2 ) An independent rudder angle indicator at the operating station;
( 3 ) An arrangement that automatically resumes operation, without reset, when power is restored after a power failure;
( 4 ) A manual means to center and steady the rudder(s) in an emergency; and
( 5 ) A limit switch to stop the steering gear before it reaches the rudder stops required by paragraph (e) of this section.
( g ) In addition to meeting the requirements of paragraphs (a) through (f) of this section, a vessel more than 19.8 meters (65 feet) in length with a power driven main steering gear must be provided with the following: ( 1 ) A visual means, located at the operating station, to indicate operation of the power units; and
( 2 ) Instructions for transfer procedures from the main steering gear or control to the auxiliary means of steering required by § 182.620, posted at the location where the transfer is carried out.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 986, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51358, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58288, Sept. 29, 2014]