alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOSEPH JONES,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 14-CV-14484

vs. HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

J. WIERMAN and ALFRED JONES,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE

JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [DOC. 38]

This matter is before the court on plaintiff Joseph Jones’s action alleging that

defendant Jennifer Wierman was deliberately indifferent to Jones’s serious medical

needs in her provision of medical care to him while he was incarcerated at the G.

Robert Cotton Correctional Facility in Jackson, Michigan (“JCF”). Plaintiff’s claims arise

out of the fact that he suffered an injury prior to being incarcerated, had been prescribed

certain medication to manage his pain, and that the JCF medical staff prescribed him

Tylenol as opposed to his desired medication. Plaintiff sued defendant nurse

practitioner Wierman because she determined what medication he received and he

sued defendant Alfred Jones because he denied a grievance appeal that plaintiff

submitted regarding the medication change. The court previously granted defendant

Alfred Jones’s motion for summary judgment. 

This matter is presently before the court on Magistrate Judge Grand’s report and

recommendation addressing defendant Wierman’s motion for summary judgment. 

Magistrate Judge Grand recommends that defendant Wierman’s motion for summary

-1-

2:14-cv-14484-GCS-DRG Doc # 40 Filed 11/07/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 329
judgment be granted because plaintiff fails to show that defendant Wierman violated his

Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. Plaintiff did not

file objections to the report and recommendation within the established time period. 

The court has reviewed the file, record, and magistrate judge's report and

recommendation.

The court agrees with the analysis conducted by the magistrate judge, and

therefore accepts his recommendation that defendant Wierman’s motion for summary

judgment be GRANTED.

Dated: November 7, 2016

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

November 7, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also

on Joseph Jones #139995, 42605 Orchard,

Clinton Township, MI 48036.

s/Barbara Radke

Deputy Clerk

-2-

2:14-cv-14484-GCS-DRG Doc # 40 Filed 11/07/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 330
Exhibit 99.5

GRAPHIC

| |  | PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered AccountantsPO Box 82
Royal Trust Tower, Suite 3000
Toronto Dominion Centre
Toronto, Ontario
Canada M5K 1G8
Telephone+1 416 863 1133
Facsimile+1 416 365 8215
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consent of Independent Auditors

We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Alliance Atlantis Communications Inc. ('Company') of our auditors' report dated March 20,
2006 relating to the consolidated financial statements, our auditors' report dated March 20, 2006 relating to the schedule of reconciliation to generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States of America and our comments by auditors on Canada-USA reporting differences dated March 20, 2006 included in the 2005 Annual Report on Form 40-F.

GRAPHIC

March
20, 2006

PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the Canadian firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the other member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each
of which is a separate and independent legal entity.

---
# C_2008218EN.01001701.xml

| 27.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 218/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 218/17

---

Public service obligation

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 218/08)

Pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes the Åland Provincial Government has decided to renew the public service obligation (OJ C 93, 21.4.2006, p. 4) in respect of scheduled air services operated between Mariehamn/Åland (MHQ) and Stockholm/Arlanda (ARN).

The renewed public service obligation shall apply, with the following amendments, as of 1 March 2009.

In all other respects the public service obligation published on 21 April 2006 shall apply.

MODIFICATION

Minimum number of flights

From 1 March 2009 to 29 February 2012, the minimum number of lights from Monday to Friday must be at least 2 round trips per day. There will be no service on weeks falling entirely within the month of July.

Timetable

The flight must land at ARN from Monday to Friday by no later than 7.00.

---
N

Sea Floor off San Diego, California

Coronado Bank Coronado Bank

San Diego La Jolla San Diego La Jolla

La Jolla Canyon

La Jolla Canyon

Loma Sea Valley

Loma Sea Valley

La

Jolla

Fan Valley
Place 

Stamp 

Here

Ocean-floor image generated from multibeam-bathymetry data 

acquired by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS); Woods Hole 

Oceanographic Institution; Scripps Institution of Oceanography; 

California State University, Monterey Bay; and Fugro Pelagos. 

To learn more, visit http://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/2007/2959/.

View eastward. Elevations color coded, from purple (deep) to pale blue 

(shallow). Lower right: ridge capped by Coronado Bank is separated from 

the continental shelf by Loma Sea Valley. Left of center: La Jolla submarine 

canyon and fan with meandering channel. Land from satellite imagery 

draped over USGS digital elevation models (DEMs). Distance across 

bottom of image is about 30 km (20 mi); vertical exaggeration is 2X. 

U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

GIP 87

2009
# C_2012126EN.01002701.xml

| 28.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/27

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 February 2012 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-3/11) (1)

1

(Civil service - Officials - Social security - Accident - Request for a document to be placed on the accident file - Request refused - Measure not having an adverse effect - Manifest inadmissibility)

2012/C 126/50

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the implied decision rejecting the applicant’s request of 15 March 2010 and the claim for compensation for the damage suffered.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay all the costs.

| 3. | Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay to the Tribunal the sum of EUR 2 000. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay to the Tribunal the sum of EUR 2 000.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 9.4.2011, p. 22.

1

---
§ 111.51-5 Protection of vital equipment. ( a ) The coordination of overcurrent protective devices must be demonstrated for all potential plant configurations.
( b ) Protective relays and overcurrent protective devices must be installed so that: ( 1 ) A short-circuit on a circuit that is not vital to the propulsion, control, or safety of the vessel does not trip equipment that is vital; and
( 2 ) A short-circuit on a circuit that is vital to the propulsion, control, or safety of the vessel is cleared only by the protective device that is closest to the point of the short-circuit.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

In re:

Bankr. No. 13-53846 (Chapter 9)

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, HON. STEVEN W. RHODES

Debtor.

__________________________________/

CORNELL E. SQUIRES, Civil Action No. 14-cv-14923

HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

Appellant,

v.

CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, et al.,

Appellees.

__________________________________/

ORDER DENYING APPELLANT’S “MOTION FOR ADOPTION AND 

DESIGNATION STATEMENT OF DRCEA,” “MOTION OBJECTION TO THE

DISMISSAL,” AND “MOTION TO QUASH DISMISSAL”

This is matter is presently before the Court on appellant’s “motion for adoption and

designation statement of DRCEA, because associate is a member” [docket entry 19], “motion

objection to the dismissal and notice of adjudicative facts of bias Rule 201,” [docket entry 20] and

“motion to quash dismissal” [docket entry 21]. Although appellant does not properly title his

motions, the Court construes the substance of these motions as a motion for rehearing pursuant to

Fed. R. Bank. P. 8022, which states “[t]he motion must state with particularity each point of law or

fact that the movant believes the district court or BAP has overlooked or misapprehended and must

argue in support of the motion.” 

Appellant’s motions do not state with particularity each point of law or fact that

2:14-cv-14923-BAF-RSW Doc # 22 Filed 02/18/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 310
1

 Appellant, however, does raise one new legal argument. In his “Motion to Quash

Dismissal,” appellant argues that Fed. R. Civ. P. 18 allows him to adopt DRCEA’s designated

bankruptcy record. This is not the case and this rule has no bearing on this appeal as it speaks to the

number of claims that a litigant can bring against a party.

2

appellant believes the Court overlooked. In fact, appellant’s motions are nearly incomprehensible.

Nevertheless, it appears that appellant’s motions are a second attempt at rehashing previously raised

arguments1

 that have been addressed in the Court’s Order of Dismissal dated January 30, 2015. The

Court is well aware of appellant’s affiliation with DRCEA. But regardless of appellant’s affiliation

with DRCEA, the bankruptcy rules are clear: appellant was required to timely designate the record

in his own, individually-filed appeal. Appellant failed to do so and he cannot simply adopt the

record designated by appellants in another City of Detroit bankruptcy appeal.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that appellant’s “motion for adoption and designation statement

of DRCEA, because associate is a member” [docket entry 19], “motion objection to the dismissal

and notice of adjudicative facts of bias Rule 201” [docket entry 20], and “motion to quash dismissal”

[docket entry 21] are denied.

S/Bernard A. Friedman 

Dated: February 18, 2015 BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

Detroit, Michigan SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2:14-cv-14923-BAF-RSW Doc # 22 Filed 02/18/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 311
Exhibit 99.2

Consent from Myers Norris Penny LLP for December 31, 2004 and 2003







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We hereby consent to the use in this Annual Report on form 20-F of Birch Mountain Resources Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2005 of our report dated February 25, 2005 (except for notes 3 and 8 of such report, which are dated as of July 25, 2005) with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Birch Mountain Resources Ltd., as at and for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.



/s/ Meyers Norris Penny LLP

Calgary, Canada

Chartered Accountants

March 23, 2006
# CE2009295EN.01016301.xml

| 4.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 295/163 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 295/163

---

Wednesday 3 September 2008Classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures ***I

P6_TA(2008)0392

European Parliament legislative resolution of 3 September 2008 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, and amending Directive 67/548/EEC and Regulation (EC) No1907/2006 (COM(2007)0355 — C6-0197/2007 — 2007/0121(COD))

2009/C 295 E/40

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2007)0355),

having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0197/2007),

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A6-0140/2008),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

---

Wednesday 3 September 2008P6_TC1-COD(2007)0121

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading of 3 September 2008 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No .../2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.)

---
§ 169.673 Installation of wiring for power and lighting circuits. ( a ) Wiring must be run as high as practicable above the bilges.
( b ) Wiring, where subject to mechanical damage, must be protected.
( c ) A wiring joint or splice must be mechanically secure and made in a junction box or enclosure.
( d ) Unless a splice is made by an insulated pressure wire connector, it must be thoroughly soldered and taped with electrical insulating tape or the soldered joint must be otherwise protected to provide insulation equivalent to that of the conductors joined.
( e ) Where ends of stranded conductors are to be clamped under terminal screws, they must be formed and soldered unless fitted with pressure terminal connectors.
( f ) Conductors must be protected from overcurrent in accordance with their current-carrying capacities.
( g ) Conductors supplying motors and motor operated appliances must be protected by a separate overcurrent device that is responsive to motor current. This device must be rated or set at not more than 125 percent of the motor full-load current rating.
( h ) On metallic vessels the enclosures and frames of all major electrical equipment must be permanently grounded to the metal hull of the vessel by the mounting bolts or other means. Cable armor must not be used as the normal grounding means.
( i ) On nonmetallic vessels, the enclosures and frames of major electrical equipment must be bonded together to a common ground by a normally noncurrent carrying conductor.
( j ) For grounded systems the negative polarity of the supply source must be grounded to the metal hull or, for nonmetallic vessels, connected to the common ground.
( k ) On a nonmetallic vessel, where a ground plate is provided for radio equipment it must be connected to the common ground.
( l ) For grounded systems, hull return must not be used except for engine starting purposes.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Loral Space & Communications Ltd. for the nine months
ended December 31, 1996, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,180,752
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,210,307
<PP&E>                                          20,254
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,315
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,699,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,131
<BONDS>                                        583,292
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        459
<COMMON>                                         1,911
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,067,699
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,699,326
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,787
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,284
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,498
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,912
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,877
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,877
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04


</TABLE>
§ 176.645 AHE Procedure. ( a ) To complete the underwater survey you must— ( 1 ) Perform a general examination of the underwater hull plating and a detailed examination of all hull welds, propellers, tailshafts, rudders, and other hull appurtenances;
( 2 ) Examine all sea chests;
( 3 ) Remove and inspect all sea valves in the presence of a marine inspector once every five years;
( 4 ) Remove all passengers from the vessel when the sea valves are being examined, if required by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI);
( 5 ) Allow access to all internal areas of the hull for examination, except internal tanks that carry fuel (unless damage or deterioration is discovered or suspect), sewage, or potable water. Internal sewage and potable water tanks may be examined visually or by non-destructive testing to the satisfaction of the attending marine inspector; and
( 6 ) Meet the requirements in § 176.650 of this part.
( b ) A marine inspector may examine any other areas deemed necessary by the OCMI.
( c ) If the AHE reveals significant deterioration or damage to the vessel's hull plating or structural members, the OCMI must be immediately notified. The OCMI may require the vessel be drydocked or otherwise taken out of service to further assess the extent of damage or to effect permanent repairs if the assessment or repairs cannot be completed to the satisfaction of the OCMI while the vessel is waterborne.
[USCG-2000-6858, 67 FR 21086, Apr. 29, 2002, as amended at 69 FR 47384, Aug. 5, 2004]
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128744 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

JOHN H. DETAR,

Plaintiff, 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

v SC: 128744 Justices 

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, 

Defendant. 

 AGC: 3465/04 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered. 

Relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested 

relief. 

s1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
<PAGE>   1

EXCITE, INC                                                        EXHIBIT 21.01
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME                                JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION       PERCENT OWNED
-------------------------           -----------------------------       -------------
<S>                                 <C>                                 <C>
MatchLogic, Inc.                    Delaware, USA                            100%

The McKinley Group, Inc.            Delaware, USA                            100%

Excite UK Limited                   United Kingdom                           100%

Netbot, Inc.                        Delaware, USA                            100%

E-Media Limited                     Ontario, Canada                          100%

Excite Japan Co. LTD                Japan                                     50%
</TABLE>
§ 185.516 Life jacket placards. ( a ) Placards containing instructions for the donning and use of the life jackets aboard the vessel must be posted in conspicuous places that are regularly accessible and visible to the crew and passengers.
( b ) If the cognizant OCMI determines that there is no suitable mounting surface aboard the vessel, the life jacket placards need not be posted but must be carried aboard the vessel and be available to the crew and passengers for familiarization.
###### Editorial Note on Part 153

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 153.1104 Draining of cargo hose: Categories A, B, C, and D.

Before a cargo hose used in discharging an NLS from a ship's cargo tank is disconnected, the hose must be drained back to the transfer terminal unless the tank unloading the cargo has a waiver under § 153.483 or § 153.491.

[CGD 81-101, 53 FR 28975, Aug. 1, 1988 and 54 FR 12629, Mar. 28, 1989]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit 10.9.1


                                  AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     This Amendment (the "Amendment") to the Agreement dated as of April 5,
1996 (the "Agreement"), between Loral Space & Communications Ltd. and
Bernard L. Schwartz, is made and is effective as of March 1, 1998.

     1.   The first sentence of Section 3(a) of the Agreement is hereby
amended to read as follows:

     "For services rendered by Schwartz during the term of this Agreement, the
     Company shall pay to Schwartz a base salary at the rate of $956,300 per
     year (adjusted as provided in Section 3(b)), for the period commencing on
     the Distribution Date to February 28, 1998, and a base salary at the rate
     of $1,600,000 per year (adjusted as provided in Section 3(b)), commencing
     on March 1, 1998."

     2.   This Amendment shall be construed in accordance with and governed by
the laws of the State of New York.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the
date set forth above.


                                              Loral Space & Communications Ltd.


                                              By: /s/ Eric J. Zahler
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                      Eric J. Zahler
                                                      Senior Vice President

                                                  /s/ Bernard L. Schwartz
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                      Bernard L. Schwartz