alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2








Certification
Pursuant to


Exchange
Act Rule 15d-14(b) and


18
U.S.C. Section 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Astrata Group Incorporated (the ”Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending November 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas A. Wagner, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:





i.
            The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act 1934;
and





ii.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Astrata Group Incorporated and will be
retained by Astrata Group Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







Dated:  January
      14, 2009
            /s/THOMAS A.
      WAGNER
              Name: Thomas
      A. Wagner
              Title:   Chief
      Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PLANET HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 28, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1997
<CASH>                                           9,089
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,584
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,500)
<INVENTORY>                                     42,612
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               101,010
<PP&E>                                         360,616
<DEPRECIATION>                                (37,667)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 505,559
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,579
<BONDS>                                         70,491
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,090
<OTHER-SE>                                     337,451
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   505,559
<SALES>                                        447,310
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               475,125
<CGS>                                          124,808
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  470,140
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,212
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,954
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,258
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,258
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
        

</TABLE>
Attachment 4 Presentation Slides Summary HOVENSA

## Summary 

# HOVENSA PEOPLEFUELINGA BRIGHTER FUTURE • HOVENSA refinery operation depends on use of residual fuel oil • Fuel oil must be simultaneouslyfired with gas in the same heater • NOx emissions levels even from best combination burner technology affected by manyfactors - Firebox temperature - Air preheat - Nitrogen content of fuel (typical .3 or 

### .4% N in resid) • Combination burners at HOVENSA cannot achieve emissions levels for oil proposed due to these factors and short averaging period proposed • NOx emissions are not ratable in combination burners - Not an issue for HOVENSA because only oil or gas is burned in a given combination burner • Gas with emergency oil can come close to proposed NOx levels on gas, but cannot optimize oil gun for lower NOx from oil

- HOVENSA does not use this configuration Friday April 17, 2009 1

## Recommendations 

# HOVENSA PEOPLEFUELINGA BRIGHTER FUTURE • Cofired heaterdefinition needs to reflect that heater is using gas and oil simultaneously, not individual burners • Create at leasttwo cofired heatersubcategories - Air preheat - Natural draft • Could create an emergency backup standard, if needed by other refiners • Averaging time needs to be longeror emissions standard increases • Emissions standard needs to account fortypical nitrogen content in residual fuels • Emissions standard needs to accountfor operational variability and limited data on Low NOx combination burners Friday April 17,2009 2

## BOT Emissions limits • Air Preheat Cofired Heater - Oil: .60 Ibs/MMBtu (HHV) - Gas .15 Ibs/MMBtu (HHV) • Natural Draft Cofired Heater - Oil 

### .40 Ibs/MMBtu (HHV) - Gas 

### .10 Ibs/MMBtu (HHV) • Emergency - TBD 

# HOVENSA PEOPLEFUELINGA BRIGHTER FUTURE

• Caveat: Burner spacing orfirebox height limitations could make Low NOx Combination burners unusable in some heaters

- Essential to retain case by case option Friday April 17, 2009 3
Case 2:14-cv-14808-AC-MJH ECF No. 13 filed 04/02/15 PageID.39 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:14-cv-14808-AC-MJH ECF No. 13 filed 04/02/15 PageID.40 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

ANTHONY PAGLIA, 

Case No. 2:15-cv-10904-AC-MJH 

Plaintiff, Judge Avern Cohn 

-v- 

 

BRUCE MILNES, INC., 

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., and 

WS AFTERMARKET SERVICES CORPORATION, 

Defendants. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND 

WITHOUT COSTS AS TO ALL PARTIES 

 At a session of said Court held in the 

City of Detroit, County of Wayne, 

State of Michigan on: July 13, 2015 

PRESENT: Hon. Avern Cohn 

 U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

This matter having come on through the stipulation of the parties and the 

Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises; 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any and all claims that have been plead 

or could have been plead as part of the Complaint are dismissed with prejudice and 

without costs as to all parties, as the parties agreed to a written settlement in this 

matter; 

2:15-cv-10904-AC-MJH Doc # 17 Filed 07/13/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 85
2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order resolves all pending claims 

plead in the above captioned matter and closes the case in its entirety. 

s/Avern Cohn 

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Dated: July 13, 2015 

 

AGREED AS TO FORM: 

_/s/ Adam G. Taub_(w/permission)_ /s/ Coriann Gastol 

Adam G. Taub (P48703) Eric R. Bowden (P63118) 

Attorney for Plaintiff Coriann Gastol (P74904) 

17200 West 10 Mile Road, Suite 200 Attorneys for Defendants Marty 

Southfield, MI 48075 Feldman Chevrolet, Inc. and JP 

(248) 746-3790 Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. 

adamgtaub@clgplc.net 40701 Woodward Ave, Suite 50 

 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304 

 (248) 645-9300 

 erb@colombopc.com 

 cg@colombopc.com 

/s/ Theodore J. Greeley (w/permission) 

Lori McAllister (P39501) 

Theodore J. Greeley (P77862) 

Attorneys for Defendant WS Aftermarket 

Services Corporation 

Dykema Gossett PLLC 

201 Townsend Street, Suite 900 

Lansing, MI 48933 

Telephone: (517) 374-9100 

Facsimile: (855) 256-1484 

2:15-cv-10904-AC-MJH Doc # 17 Filed 07/13/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 86
#### CHARLES S. SCHULTZ & SON, INCORPORATED, A CORPORATION, RESPONDENT, v. MAX AND STANLEY H. KLIPPER, APPELLANTS.

Submitted October 12, 1928

Decided April 11, 1929.

Before Gummebe, Chief Justice, and Justice Pabkee.

For the appellants, *Julius J. Seiden.*

Por the respondents, *Isaac Gross.*

Pee Cubiam.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment. So far as we can discover, no attempt is made to set up any defense on the merits, the suggestion being that if the court concludes that if the orderly course of procedure was not followed, the judgment should be reversed irrespective of merits. Without passing on this proposition, we have examined the record, and conclude that there was no irregularity which should vitiate the judgment.

*392After the filing of the answer there was a notice of motion to strike it ont and for judgment, returnable March 9th.' The usual affidavits were attached. The printed case does not show whether the motion was argued on March 9 th.' It does show a rule dated March 16th, extending until that date *(i. e.j,*March 16th), the time of plaintiff to reply or to; make any motion addressed to the answer. It seems to be claimed that, this rule was improvident for some reason not clearly disclosed; but in any event we learn from the ride entered on April 4th that the motion was made on March 16th, that defendants' refused to submit any affidavits on the merits, that the answer is sham, “and due notice of the motion to strike out having been served upon the defendants,” judgment was ordered entered accordingly.

The first point, as we understand it, is that the notice of motion to strike out was given after expiration of time to reply—ergo, the notice is ineffective. *Sed non sequitur.*As we read the rules, failure to reply in due time is no bar to motion for summary judgment, except that such motion normally precedes reply. Rule 30. That was the situation in this case. As to the motion being delayed until March 16th, we find nothing to indicate that- defendants challenged that step. Their counsel were present on the 16th, and contented themselves with refusing to go into the merits, though they had sufficient opportunity to do so. We must presume that the motion noticed for'the 9th was properly continued to the 16th; there is no allegation to the contrary, and merely an intimation in the brief that no further notice was given. The fact that counsel were present on the 16th is in aid of the presumption. • ■

■■ It is not denied that the answer was sham, and the- argument now ma,de' indicates that the appeal is frivolous. ■' Let the judgment be affirmed. ■ . • • ■ .
#### William Shutter, *Appellant, v.*Walter E. Ward, *Respondent*.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied, with ten dollars costs.
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.1000 Applicability.

Sections 154.1005 through 154.1020 apply to flammable cargo and ammonia carriers.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

Certification

Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2008 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert M. Little, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of            2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| /s/Robert M. Little, Jr. |
|--------------------------|
| Robert M. Little, Jr.    |
| Chief Financial Officer  |
| March 27, 2009           |
|                     |
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 24.1




         The undersigned hereby makes, constitutes and appoints Stephen J.
Felice, Thomas J. Fitzpatrick and Thomas M. Molchan, each of them acting alone,
his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for him in his name, place and stead, in any
and all capacities, to execute and cause to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 1998 of DecisionOne Corporation and any amendents thereto pursuant to
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with all exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith, and hereby ratifies and confirms all that
said attorney-in-fact or his substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.




Dated: September 17, 1998                         /s/ Peter T. Grauer*
                                                  ----------------------------
                                                  /s/ Peter T. Grauer

* Identical powers-of-attorney (other than the signature blocks) were executed
  by Giles D. Harlow, Kirk B. Wortman and Richard C. Yancey.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                     COMPUTATION OF SHARES USED IN COMPUTING
                           NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                               Year Ended December 31,
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                          1994          1995           1996
                                       ---------      ---------      --------- 
<S>                                    <C>            <C>            <C>
Common shares, beginning of period     4,681,183      4,681,183      4,685,306
Common stock equivalents                       0              0        697,534
SAB shares (1)                            79,675         79,675         98,209
Treasury stock buyback                    (3,187)        (3,187)       (87,809)
Weighted average shares issued                 0          2,056      1,956,716
                                       ---------      ---------      ---------
                                       4,757,671      4,759,727      7,349,956
                                       =========      =========      =========
</TABLE>





(1)  In accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 83 ("SAB" No. 83"),
     issuance of Common Stock equivalents (common stock, stock options) one year
     prior to the initial filing date of the registration statement at share
     prices below the public offering price of $9.50 per share, are considered
     to have been made in anticipation of the public offering and have been
     included as if the shares were outstanding for all periods presented until
     issued and outstanding using the treasury stock method.


                                       42
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2013-1031

 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM155AD

AOT 24L001-13 --- 7/25/13

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
Exibit 10.1




	





Performance Criteria
for the 2003-2005 and 2004-2006 Cycles

under the
Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan 



        For
the 2003-2005 and 2004-2006 cycles, the performance criteria under the Company’s
Long-Term Incentive Plan, which were determined by the Compensation Committee of the
Company’s Board of Directors, relate to improvements in earnings per share and return
on invested capital.
§ 176.665 Notice and plans required. ( a ) The owner or managing operator shall notify the cognizant OCMI as far in advance as possible whenever a vessel is to be hauled out or placed in a drydock or slipway in compliance with § 176.600 or to undergo repairs or alterations affecting the safety of the vessel, together with the nature of any repairs or alterations contemplated. Hull repairs or alternations that affect the safety of the vessel include but are not limited to the replacement, repair, or refastening of planking, plating, or structural members including the repair of cracks.
( b ) Whenever a vessel is hauled out or placed in a drydock or slipway in excess of the requirements of this subpart for the purpose of maintenance, including, but not limited to, changing a propeller, painting, or cleaning the hull, no report need be made to the cognizant OCMI.
( c ) The owner or managing operator of each vessel that holds a Load Line Certificate shall make plans showing the vessel's scantlings available to the Coast Guard marine inspector whenever the vessel undergoes a drydock examination, internal structural examination, or an underwater survey or whenever repairs or alterations affecting the safety or seaworthiness of the vessel are made to the vessel's hull.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 953, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51356, Sept. 30, 1997. Redesignated and amended by USCG-2000-6858, 67 FR 21084, 21087, Apr. 29, 2002; USCG-2006-25697, 71 FR 55747, Sept. 25, 2006]
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.2  


 
 

Form of 2005 STIP Participant Notice    
    


[ADELPHIA
LOGO] 


[Date]



[Name]



Dear
[Name], 


        Congratulations!
We are pleased to confirm your participation in the 2005 Adelphia Communications Short-Term Incentive Plan (STIP). The 2005 STIP was approved by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors on January 26, 2005. The plan is a key component of your total compensation package. 



        We
need to maintain a sharp focus on our goals and objectives throughout 2005. In particular, we must continue to improve operational and financial performance regardless of the outcome
of the dual path process. Whether it's a complete sale, partial sale or an emergence track that we ultimately pursue, our customers, constituents and employees will be better served if Adelphia
proceeds from a position of strength fostered by improved performance. 


        For
you, the 2005 STIP means an opportunity to earn ___% of your salary, subject to proration for changes in salary, and/or time in the plan. 


        A
summary of the plan is attached for your review. Please take time to read and understand it. Think about what you can personally do to improve results and help all of us achieve our
goals. Think about how we can better serve our customers, and how you can lead your team to improve the business and to meet our 2005 objectives. 


        Congratulations
again and thank you for your continued commitment and good work. 


Sincerely,




	



Bill Schleyer

Chairman and CEO	
 	



Ron Cooper

President and COO	
 	

 





Attachment












QuickLinks


Form of 2005 STIP Participant Notice
Exhibit 31.4



Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Vice President of Accounting



I, James R. Edmondson, certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Highlands Bankshares, Inc.



2.   Based on my  knowledge,  this  report  does not  contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this report;



3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present in all  material respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.   The registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,  including its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by  others  within  those entities,  particularly  during the period in which this   report is being prepared;



(b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)  disclosed  in  this   report  any  change  in the  registrant's internal  control  over  financial reporting  that  occurred  during  the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,  the registrant's  internal control  over financial reporting; and



5.   The registrant's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,  based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)  all significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to record,  process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)  any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over financial reporting.





Date: March 26, 2005

/s/ James R. Edmondson

James R. Edmondson

Vice President of Accounting
**Exhibit 32.4**

 

Certification

Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2007 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, James R. Edmondson, Vice President of Accounting of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

/s/ James R. Edmonson

James R. Edmondson

Vice President of Accounting

March 26, 2008