alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     The schedule contains summary financial inofrmation extracted from the
     financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2000 and is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,189
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,641
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,000
<INVENTORY>                                    222,385
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               293,215
<PP&E>                                          19,749
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,933
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 303,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          255,332
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,600
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,099
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   303,031
<SALES>                                        297,368
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               297,368
<CGS>                                          227,345
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  227,345
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                98,365
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,862
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (32,204)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       340
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (32,544)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (32,544)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0)



</TABLE>
#### § 196.37-13 Fire extinguishing system controls.

The control cabinets or spaces containing valves, manifolds, or controls for the various fire extinguishing systems must be marked in conspicuous red letters at least 2 inches high: “[CARBON DIOXIDE/CLEAN AGENT/FOAM—as appropriate] FIRE APPARATUS.”.

[USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33894, June 7, 2012]
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

DAVID SALEWSKE, 

 PLAINTIFF, 

V. 

TROTT & TROTT, PC, 

 DEFENDANT. 

Case No.: 1:14-CV-13980-TLL-PTM

Hon. Thomas L. Ludington 

Mag. Judge Patricia T. Morris 

STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

 Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the 

parties, through their undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree, that the abovecaptioned action be dismissed with prejudice. The parties further agree that each 

side shall bear their own attorney’s fees and costs. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: November 30, 2015 

Case 1:14-cv-13980-TLL-PTM ECF No. 18 filed 11/30/15 PageID.125 Page 1 of 2
2

Stipulated and Agreed: 

/s/ Brian P. Parker (w/consent) 

Brian P. Parker (P48617) 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

2000 Town Center, Ste. 1900 

Southfield, MI 48502 

Tel: (248) 642-6268 

brianparker@collectionstopper.com 

/s/ Charity A. Olson 

Charity A. Olson (P68295) 

Attorneys for Defendant 

2723 S. State St., Ste. 150 

Ann Arbor, MI 48104 

Tel: (734) 222-5179 

colson@olsonlawpc.com 

Dated: November 24, 2015 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on November 30, 2015. 

 s/Michael A. Sian 

 MICHAEL A. SIAN, Case Manager 

Case 1:14-cv-13980-TLL-PTM ECF No. 18 filed 11/30/15 PageID.126 Page 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Axial outside-diameter crackingaffecting thermally treated alloy 600 steam generator tubing [electronicresource].**
 
NoticeSupplement 01
 
SuDoc Number:Y 3.N 88:56-2/2002-21
Item Number:1051-H-08 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000737351
 
January 15, 2020
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

                Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
         of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of
                          Title 18, United States Code)

         Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of GWL&A Financial Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June
30, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q/A") of the Company fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:     May 11, 2004     /s/William T. McCallum
                            ----------------------
                            William T. McCallum
                            President and Chief Executive Officer



Dated:     May 11, 2004     /s/Mitchell T.G. Graye
                            ----------------------
                            Mitchell T.G. Graye
                            Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-Q/A or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff/Respondent,

v.

LAMARC PEACOCK,

Defendant/Petitioner.

 /

Case No. 15-20010-2

Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds 

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Court’s opinion and order denying Petitioner’s motion

to correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF no. 114), Petitioner’s motion is DENIED. 

SO ORDERED.

s/Nancy G. Edmunds 

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge

Dated: March 27, 2019

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon parties and counsel

of record on March 27, 2019, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Lisa Bartlett 

Case Manager
§ 28.130 Survival craft equipment. ( a ) *General.* Each item of survival craft equipment must be of good quality, effective for the purpose it is intended to serve, and secured to the craft.
( b ) *Inflatable liferafts.* Each inflatable liferaft must have one of the following equipment packs as shown by the markings on its container: ( 1 ) Coastal Service;
( 2 ) SOLAS B Pack (formerly “Limited Service”); or
( 3 ) SOLAS A Pack (formerly “Ocean Service”).
( c ) Each life float and buoyant apparatus must be fitted with a lifeline, pendants, a painter, and a floating electric water light approved under part 161 subpart 161.010 of this chapter.
( d ) *Other survival craft.* A vessel must not carry survival craft other than inflatable liferafts, life floats, inflatable buoyant apparatus, or buoyant apparatus, such as lifeboats or rigid liferafts, unless the survival craft and launching equipment comply with the requirements for installation, arrangement, equipment, and maintenance contained in 46 CFR part 199.
[CGD 88-079, 56 FR 40393, Aug. 14, 1991, as amended by CGD 84-069, 63 FR 52813, Oct. 1, 1998]
# C_2012319EN.01001002.xml

| 20.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/10

---

Order of the General Court of 6 September 2012 — Technion and Technion Research & Development Foundation v Commission

(Case T-657/11) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities - Letter notifying the applicant of the Commission’s intention to recover the adjusted sums pursuant to a research financing contract - Acts inseparable from the contract - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 319/18

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Technion — Israel Institute of Technology (Haifa, Israel) and Technion Research & Development Foundation Ltd (Haifa) (represented by: D. Grisay and D. Piccininno, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Calciu and F. Moro, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s letter of 19 October 2011 notifying the applicant of the issuing of a debit note for the reimbursement of the sum of EUR 97 106,72, corresponding to the amount of the adjusted sums for contract No 034984 (Mosaica), following the conclusions of the financial audit concerning, inter alia, that contract, concluded under the sixth framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities, contributing to the creation of the European research area and to innovation (2002 — 2006)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

| 2. | Technion — Israel Institute of Technology and Technion Research & Development Foundation Ltd are ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Technion — Israel Institute of Technology and Technion Research & Development Foundation Ltd are ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 73, 10.3.2012.

1

---
§ 201.158 Decisions, authority to make and kinds. To the presiding officer is delegated the authority to render initial or recommended decisions in all proceedings before him, including motions, petitions and other pleadings. Tentative or final decisions will be rendered by the Administration. The same officers who preside at the reception of evidence pursuant to section 7 of the Administrative Procedure Act shall render the initial or recommended decisions except where such officers become unavailable to the Administration, in which case another Presiding Officer will be designated to make such decision or certify the record to the Administration. Where the Administration requires the entire record in the case to be certified to it for initial decision, the Presiding Officer shall first recommend a decision, except that in rule making: ( a ) In lieu thereof the Administration may issue a tentative decision or any of its responsible officers may recommend a decision or
( b ) any such procedure may be omitted in any case in which the Administration finds upon the record that due and timely execution of its functions in the public interest imperatively and unavoidably so requires.
§ 28.405 Hydraulic equipment. ( a ) Each hydraulic system must be so designed and installed that proper operation of the system is not affected by back pressure in the system.
( b ) Piping and piping components must be designed with a burst pressure of not less than four times the system maximum operating pressure.
( c ) Each hydraulic system must be equipped with at least one pressure relieving device set to relieve at the system's maximum operating pressure.
( d ) All material in a hydraulic system must be suitable for use with the hydraulic fluid used and must be of such chemical and physical properties as to remain ductile at the lowest operating temperature likely to be encountered by the vessel.
( e ) Except for hydraulic steering equipment, controls for hydraulic equipment must be located where the operator has an unobstructed view of the hydraulic equipment and the adjacent working area.
( f ) Controls for hydraulic equipment must be so arranged that the operator is able to quickly disengage the equipment in an emergency.
( g ) Hydraulically operated machinery must be equipped with a holding device to prevent uncontrolled movement due to loss of hydraulic system pressure.
( h ) A nonmetallic flexible hose must only be used between two points of relative motion, including a pump and piping system, and must meet SAE J 1942.
( i ) Each nonmetallic flexible hose and hose assembly must be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's rating and guidelines and must be limited to a length of not more that 30 inches (0.76 meters) in an application not subject to torsional loading.
# C_2012331EN.01002102.xml

| 27.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 September 2012 — Since Hardware (Guangzhou) v Council

(Case T-156/11) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of ironing boards originating in China - Proceeding initiated against a single company - Market economy treatment - Three-month time-limit provided for in the second indent of Article 2(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Burden of proof - Determination of injury)

(2012/C 331/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Since Hardware (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd (Canton, China) (represented by: V. Akritidis and Y. Melin, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen, acting as Agent, B. O’Connor, Solicitor, and S. Gubel, lawyer)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Thomas and H. van Vliet, acting as Agents), Vale Mill (Rochdale) Ltd, (Rochdale, United Kingdom) and Colombo New Scal SpA, (Rovagnate, Italy) (represented by: G. Berrisch, lawyer, and N. Chesaites, Barrister)

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1243/2010 of 20 December 2010 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ironing boards originating in the People’s Republic of China produced by the Since Hardware (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd (OJ 2010 L 338, p. 22).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Since Hardware (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the Euorpean Union, Vale Mill (Rochdale) Ltd and Colombo New Scal SpA. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Since Hardware (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the Euorpean Union, Vale Mill (Rochdale) Ltd and Colombo New Scal SpA.

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 120, 16.4.2011.

---
§ 221.69 Hearing Officer. ( a ) The Hearing Officer shall have no responsibility, direct or supervisory, for the investigation of cases referred for the assessment of civil penalties.
( b ) The Hearing Officer shall decide each case on the basis of the evidence before him or her, and must have no prior connection with the case. The Hearing Officer is solely responsible for the decision in each case referred to him or her.
( c ) The Hearing Officer is authorized to administer oaths and issue subpoenas necessary to the conduct of a hearing, to the extent provided by law.
#### JOHN SMITH, PLAINTIFF, v. CYRIL BAER, DEFENDANT.

Submitted October 11, 1929

Decided December 13, 1929.

Before Justices Pakkee, Black and Bodine.

Por the rule, *Heine & Laird.*

*Contra, Feder &*Binzler.

Pee Curiam.

The plaintiff brought suit to recover compensation for injuries received in an automobile accident, and recovered a judgment of $3,500.

The suit was tried before the late Judge Newman. After his death, application was made to a Circuit judge for an order setting aside the verdict and granting a new trial. The course pursued seems to have been irregular, but the Circuit judge vacated the order and granted a rule for a new trial, which is now before us.

The defendant shows a defense upon the merits and that the case was tried in the absence of counsel actually engaged in other courts. We think the Circuit judge had power, though more than six days had expired from the entry of the verdict, to grant the rule to show cause before us. Since it appears that there was a defense on the merits and that counsel were unavoidably engaged in other courts, we will make the rule absolute, save in this, that the judgment already recovered shall stand as security to abide the outcome of the new trial.
|   | A) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or      78o(d)) and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | B) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of the dates and for the periods covered by the  Report. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  January      27, 2010 |   |                                                                                                                                    |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   | By:    | /s/ Andrew      Gordon                                                                                                             |   |
|                                   |   | Andrew      Gordon                                                                                                                      |   |
|                                   |   | President,      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive      Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |   |
|                                   |   |                                                                                                                                    |   |
#### § 201.30 Parties; how designated.

The term *party,* whenever used in these Rules, shall include any natural person, corporation, association, firm, partnership, trustee, receiver, agency, public or private organization, or governmental agency. A party requesting official action subject to these Rules shall be designated as *applicant.* A party whose petition for leave to intervene is granted pursuant to § 201.78 shall be designated as *intervenor.* Only a party as designated in this section may introduce evidence or examine witnesses at hearings.
§ 189.55-1 General. ( a ) The following list of required plans in § 189.55-5 is general in character, but includes all plans which normally show construction and safety features coming under the cognizance of the Coast Guard. In the case of a particular vessel, all of the plans enumerated may not be applicable and it is intended that only those plans and specifications be submitted as will clearly show the vessel's arrangements, construction and required equipment.
( b ) In the following list of required plans in § 189.55-5, the items which must be approved by the American Bureau of Shipping for vessels classed by that organization are indicated by an asterisk. When prints bearing record of such approval by the American Bureau of Shipping are forwarded to the Coast Guard they will in general be accepted as satisfactory except insofar as the law or the Coast Guard regulations contain requirements which are not covered by the American Bureau of Shipping.
###### Editorial Note on Part 153

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 153.808 Examination required for a Certificate of Compliance.

Before a vessel receives either an initial or a reissued Certificate of Compliance endorsed to carry a cargo from Table 1 of this part, the vessel must call at a U.S. port for an examination during which the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, determines whether or not the vessel meets the requirements of this chapter.

[CGD 81-052, 50 FR 8733, Mar. 5, 1985, as amended by CGD 95-027, 61 FR 26009, May 23, 1996]
# C_2012109EN.01001302.xml

| 14.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/13

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 13 February 2012 — Dansk Automat Brancheforening v Commission

(Case T-601/11 R)

(Interim measures - State aid - Danish law instituting lower duties for providers of online gaming - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of urgency - Weighing up of interests)

2012/C 109/30

Language of the case: Danish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dansk Automat Brancheforening (Fredericia, Denmark) (represented by: K. Dyekjær, T. Høg and J. Flodgaard, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Afonso and C. Barslev, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2011) 6499 final of 20 September 2011 on the measure No C 35/2010 (ex N 302/2010) which Denmark is planning to implement in the form of duties for online gaming in the Danish Gaming Duties Act

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zomex Distribution, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter Buckley, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:				(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and				(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| /s/ Peter Buckley                                 |
|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   |
| **Peter Buckley**                                 |
| **President and Chief Executive 								Officer** |

----