alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 07-12]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 604-6475.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 07-12 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: April 24, 2007.

L.M. Bynum,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 21229)          ( print page 21230)          ( print page 21231)          ( print page 21232)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 07-2094 Filed 4-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
§ 169.241 Machinery. ( a ) At each inspection for certification and periodic inspection, the marine inspector will examine and test the following items to the extent necessary, to determine that they are in proper operating condition and fit for the service for which they are intended: ( 1 ) *Engine starting system.* Alternate methods of starting are checked.
( 2 ) *Engine control mechanisms.* Mechanisms are operationally tested and visually examined.
( 3 ) *Auxiliary machinery.* All machinery essential to the routine operation of the vessel is checked.
( 4 ) *Fuel systems.* Tanks, tank vents and other appurtenances, piping and pipe fittings are examined. The fuel systems for the auxiliary propulsion engines and all other fuel systems installed are checked. All valves in the fuel lines are tested by operating locally and at remote operating positions.
( 5 ) *Sea valves and bulkhead closure valves.* All overboard discharge and intake valves are checked.
( 6 ) *Bilge and drainage systems.* The means provided for pumping bilges are operationally tested. All suction strainers are examined.
( b ) During all inspections special attention is paid to ensure that no fire hazards exist and that guards or protective devices are provided in all hazardous places.
[CGD 83-005, 51 FR 896, Jan. 9, 1986, as amended by USCG-1999-4976, 65 FR 6508, Feb. 9, 2000]
§ 195.35-10 Fireman's outfit. ( a ) Each fireman's outfit must consist of one self-contained breathing apparatus, one lifeline with a belt or a suitable harness, one flashlight, one flame safety lamp, one rigid helmet, boots and gloves, protective clothing, and one fire ax.
( b ) Every vessel shall carry at least two fireman's outfits. The fireman's outfits must be stored in widely separated, accessible locations.
[CGFR 69-72, 34 FR 17504, Oct. 29, 1969, as amended by CGD 75-074, 42 FR 5965, Jan. 31, 1977; CGD 86-036, 57 FR 48327, Oct. 23, 1992]
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.108-4 Approval procedures. ( a ) Manufacturers that desire type approval should submit a written notice to the Commandant (CG-ENG-4) describing the product and its intended uses. The Commandant will evaluate this information and notify the manufacturer of the product's suitability for testing. The manufacturer should then contract directly with an accepted independent laboratory to perform the required tests and inspections.
( b ) Upon completion of the required testing and inspections, the manufacturer must submit either a written request for type approval to the Commandant (CG-ENG-4) United States Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, or electronically submit a request to *typeapproval@uscg.mil*. The request must indicate the name and address of the manufacturer, all product designations, and the address of all manufacturing facilities. The request must include a copy of the final fire test report and the production inspection procedures. From the information submitted, the Commandant determines whether or not the product is acceptable for type approval. If the product is determined to be acceptable, a type approval certificate valid for a 5-year period will be issued. If the product is not accepted, the manufacturer will be notified of the reasons why.
§ 167.45-60 Emergency breathing apparatus and flame safety lamps. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76706 , Sept. 18, 2024.
Each nautical-school ship must be equipped with the following devices: ( a ) Two pressure-demand, open circuit, self-contained breathing apparatus, approved by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) and by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and having at a minimum a 30-minute air supply, a full face piece, and a spare charge for each. A self-contained compressed-air breathing apparatus previously approved under part 160, subpart 160.011, of this chapter may continue in use as required equipment if it was part of the vessel's equipment on November 23, 1992, and as long as it is maintained in good condition to the satisfaction of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
( b ) One flame safety lamp approved by the Coast Guard or Navy.
[CGD 86-036, 57 FR 48326, Oct. 23, 1992, as amended by CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51217, Sept. 30, 1997]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-11453, 333-65204, 333-67799, 333-74772,
333-91964) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-71238) of Onyx Acceptance
Corporation of our report dated February 13, 2003, relating to the financial
statements, which appears in this Form 10-K.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Orange County, California
March 28, 2003
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

         Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of GWL&A Financial Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
(the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:   August 13, 2003   /s/ William T. McCallum
                           -------------------------------------
                           William T. McCallum
                           President and Chief Executive Officer



Dated:   August 13, 2003   /s/ Mitchell T.G. Graye
                           -------------------------------------
                           Mitchell T.G. Graye
                           Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed
as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Numatics, Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John H.
Welker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
(S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

     (1)   that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. (S) 78m or 78o(d));
and

     (2)   that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                               /s/ John H. Welker
                                               ----------------------------
                                               John H. Welker
                                               Chief Executive Officer

                                               March 27, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements  for the six  months  ended  June 30,  1999 and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                           1,494
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  139,061
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    19,108
<INVENTORY>                                                    104,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               229,147
<PP&E>                                                          17,279
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   6,173
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 240,253
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          142,049
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                         6,600
<OTHER-SE>                                                      78,604
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   240,253
<SALES>                                                        315,014
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               315,014
<CGS>                                                          209,237
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   63,980
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   680
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 8,445
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               3,250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 38,547
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       680
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             37,867
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    37,867
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     0.01



</TABLE>
#### Harris Andrews, *Respondent, v.*Amasa Miles and Asa Miles, *Appellants*.

Judgment and order affirmed as to Amasa Miles, and reversed as to Asa Miles, and new trial ordered in Ontario County Court, with costs to abide the event. Opinion by

Hardin, J.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.5

SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES FOR AWARDS UNDER THE LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
OF CENTERPOINT ENERGY, INC.

Distributions pursuant to Performance Unit Awards and Performance Share Awards:

     o    for the 2002 - 2004 performance cycle are based on (i) a total
          shareholder return measure of CenterPoint Energy, Inc. compared to a
          peer group of companies in which at least 80% of revenues are
          generated from regulated operations (the "Total Shareholder Return
          Measure") and (ii) operating cash flow of CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
          ("Operating Cash Flow"), weighted 40% for the Total Shareholder Return
          Measure and 60% for Operating Cash Flow, for all participants other
          than those employed by Texas Genco Holdings, Inc. Distributions for
          participants employed by Texas Genco Holdings, Inc. are based on the
          Total Shareholder Return Measure, a combined goal based on controlling
          operations and maintenance expenses and capital expenditures and a
          goal based on limiting forced outages, weighted 25%, 40% and 35%,
          respectively;

     o    for the 2003 - 2005 performance cycle are based on the Total
          Shareholder Return Measure and Operating Cash Flow weighted 60% and
          40%, respectively, for all participants; and

     o    for the 2004 - 2006 performance cycle are based on a total shareholder
          return measure of CenterPoint Energy, Inc. compared to the companies
          in the S&P utility index for all participants.
4:14-cv-11764-LVP-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 1 of 18 Pg ID 1
4:14-cv-11764-LVP-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 2 of 18 Pg ID 2
4:14-cv-11764-LVP-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 3 of 18 Pg ID 3
4:14-cv-11764-LVP-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 4 of 18 Pg ID 4
4:14-cv-11764-LVP-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 5 of 18 Pg ID 5
4:14-cv-11764-LVP-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 6 of 18 Pg ID 6
4:14-cv-11764-LVP-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 7 of 18 Pg ID 7
4:14-cv-11764-LVP-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 8 of 18 Pg ID 8
4:14-cv-11764-LVP-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 9 of 18 Pg ID 9
4:14-cv-11764-LVP-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 10 of 18 Pg ID 10
4:14-cv-11764-LVP-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 11 of 18 Pg ID 11
4:14-cv-11764-LVP-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 12 of 18 Pg ID 12
4:14-cv-11764-LVP-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 13 of 18 Pg ID 13
4:14-cv-11764-LVP-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 14 of 18 Pg ID 14
4:14-cv-11764-LVP-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 15 of 18 Pg ID 15
4:14-cv-11764-LVP-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 16 of 18 Pg ID 16
4:14-cv-11764-LVP-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 17 of 18 Pg ID 17
4:14-cv-11764-LVP-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 18 of 18 Pg ID 18
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

 

BROVIA EVANS, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) Case No.: 2:15-CV-11300-BAF-MKM 

 ) 

STELLAR RECOVERY, INC., ) 

 ) 

 Defendant, ) 

DEFENDANT STELLAR RECOVERY, INC.’S 

FEDERAL RULE 7.1(a) CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

AND NOTIFICATION AS TO AFFILIATES

NOW COMES the Defendant, STELLAR RECOVERY, INC., through 

undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Rule 7.1(a) and (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, hereby submits its Corporate Disclosure Statement and states as follows: 

1. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a) provides: “A non-governmental corporate party to an 

action or proceeding in a district court must file two copies of a statement that identifies 

any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation that owns 10% or more of its 

stock or states that there is no such corporation.” 

 2. Stellar Recovery, Inc. is a Florida corporation. Stellar Recovery, Inc. is 

wholly privately owned. 

2:15-cv-11300-BAF-MKM Doc # 7 Filed 05/01/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 21
- 2 -

Respectfully Submitted, 

STEVEN A. SIMAN, P.C. 

/s/ Steven A. Siman 

Steven A. Siman (P20480) 

Attorneys for Defendant

3250 W. Big Beaver, Suite 344 

Troy, MI 48084-2902 

(248) 643-4700 

sas@simanlaw.net

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on this 1st day of May, 2015, I filed the foregoing 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF DEFENDANT STELLAR 

RECOVERY, INC. with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send 

notification of such filing to:

Jeffrey S. Hyslip 

1100 W. Cermak Rd., Suite B410 

Chicago, IL 60608 

jeffrey@lifetimedebtsolutions.com 

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF 

Respectfully Submitted, 

STEVEN A. SIMAN, P.C. 

/s/ Steven A. Siman 

Steven A. Siman (P20480) 

Attorneys for Defendant

3250 W. Big Beaver, Suite 344 

Troy, MI 48084-2902 

(248) 643-4700 

sas@simanlaw.net

2:15-cv-11300-BAF-MKM Doc # 7 Filed 05/01/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 22
#### § 196.37-9 Carbon dioxide and clean agent alarms.

Each extinguishing system using carbon dioxide or clean agent complying with 46 CFR subpart 95.16 must be conspicuously marked in an adjacent location: “WHEN ALARM SOUNDS VACATE AT ONCE. CARBON DIOXIDE OR CLEAN AGENT BEING RELEASED.”.

[USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33894, June 7, 2012]
§ 177.810 Overnight accommodations. ( a ) A berth must be provided for each passenger authorized to be carried in overnight accommodation spaces. Each berth must measure at least 1,880 millimeters (74 inches) by 610 millimeters (24 inches) and have at least 610 millimeters (24 inches) of clear space above.
( b ) Berths must not be located more than three high and must be constructed of wood, fiber reinforced plastic, or metal. A berth located more than 1520 millimeters (60 inches) above the deck must be fitted with a suitable aid for access.
( c ) The construction and arrangement of berths and other furniture must allow free and unobstructed access to each berth. Each berth must be immediately adjacent to an aisle leading to a means of escape from the accommodation space. An aisle alongside a berth must be at least 610 millimeters (24 inches) wide. An aisle joining two or more aisles in an overnight accommodation space must be at least 1,060 millimeters (42 inches) wide.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 961, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51050, Sept. 30, 1997]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50671 Summary Calendar

GERALD T. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus VICTOR RAUL RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-95-CV-637

- - - - - - - - - - October 30, 1997 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Gerald T. Armstrong (#1045673), a state prisoner, has applied for a certificate of appealability (“COA”) authorizing an appeal from the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. COA is DENIED as UNNECESSARY. See Green v. Johnson , 116 F.3d 1115, 1119-20 (5th Cir. 1997). Armstrong contends that retroactive application of Texas’s mandatory supervision statute, see Tex. Code Crim. Pro. art.No. 96-50671 -2- 42.18 (West Supp. 1997), violated the Ex Post Facto Clause. Armstrong contends that he was improperly forced to accept special release conditions such as sex-offender treatment and supervision fees and that he had been repeatedly incarcerated because he had breached those conditions. Armstrong argues that he initially asserted his claim in a civil rights action and would not have recast it as a habeas claim if he had not been ordered to do so by the district court. Armstrong also contends that retroactive application of a Texas Department of Criminal Justice (“TDCJ”) policy prohibiting restoration of good-time credits also violated the Ex Post Facto Clause. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing this claim as successive under Rule 9(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. See Duff-Smith v. Collins , 995 F.2d 545, 546 (5th Cir. 1993). Relief may not be had on the restoration-of-good-time-credits issue. See Hallmark v. Johnson , 118 F.3d 1073, 1079-80 (5th Cir. 1997). The district court’s judgment is
AFFIRMED.
# C_2012065EN.01002201.xml

| 3.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/22

---

Action brought on 2 December 2011 — ZZ and Others v Commission

(Case F-130/11)

2012/C 65/41

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ZZ and Others (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decisions transferring pension rights acquired before entry into Commission service on the basis of the re-calculated PMO proposal.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decisions annulling and replacing the proposals for transfer of the applicants’ pension rights pursuant to their application under Article 11(2) of Annex VIII of the Staff Regulations, which contain a new proposal calculated on the basis of the general implementing provisions adopted on 3 March 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decisions annulling and replacing the proposals for transfer of the applicants’ pension rights pursuant to their application under Article 11(2) of Annex VIII of the Staff Regulations, which contain a new proposal calculated on the basis of the general implementing provisions adopted on 3 March 2011;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, AlexFerries, Chief Financial Officer of UAGH, Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)

the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter endedMarch 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and

(2)

theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

Date:  May 14, 2009

*/s/ Alex Ferries*

Alex Ferries

Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act hasbeen furnished to UAGH, Inc. and will be retained by UAGH, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.