alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011130EN.01002101.xml

| 30.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/21

---

Action brought on 7 March 2011 — Kessé v Council

(Case T-132/11)

2011/C 130/40

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Feh Lambert Kessé (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) (represented by: G. Collard, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, concerning the applicant, Mr Feh Lambert KESSE, Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011, published on 15 January 2011 in the Official Journal of the European Union, are not justified in fact, |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, concerning the applicant, Mr Feh Lambert KESSE, Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011, published on 15 January 2011 in the Official Journal of the European Union, are not justified in fact,

| — | consequently,






  — | annul Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

consequently,

—

annul Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011;

| — | alternatively, order that the name of Mr Feh Lambert KESSE be removed from the lists annexed to that regulation and to that decision. |
| --- | --- |

—

alternatively, order that the name of Mr Feh Lambert KESSE be removed from the lists annexed to that regulation and to that decision.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments raised by the applicant are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-130/11 Gossio v Council.

Gossio v Council

---
**EXHIBIT23.1**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT’S CONSENT**

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements filed on Form S-8and Form S-3 of our report dated September 23, 2009, relating to thefinancial statements of Evolution Petroleum Corporation and subsidiariesappearing in the Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2009.

 

 
| /s/ Hein &  Associates LLP |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
| Hein &  Associates LLP     |   |
|                                |   |
| Houston, Texas                      |   |
| September 23, 2009             |   |

 

 

500 Dallas, Suite 2900

Houston, Texas 77002

Phone: 713-850-9814

Fax: 713-850-0725

www.heincpa.com

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOHN HOGSTON, 

Plaintiff,

Case No. 14-14458

v.

HONORABLE AVERN COHN

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 33)

AND

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REMAND (Doc. 26)

I.

This is a Social Security case. Plaintiff John Hogston appeals from the final

determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) that he is not

disabled and therefore not entitled to disability insurance benefits or supplemental

security income. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge for all pretrial

proceedings. (Doc. 3). Plaintiff and the Commissioner filed cross motions for summary

judgment. See Docs. 16, 18, 19, 23. Plaintiff also filed a motion for remand (Doc. 26). 

On June 256 2015, the magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation

(MJRR), recommending that plaintiff’s motion for remand be denied. (Doc. 33). 

II.

Neither party has filed objections to the MJRR and the time for filing objections

has passed. The failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any

2:14-cv-14458-AC-APP Doc # 34 Filed 07/21/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 958
further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d

1370, 1373 (6th Cir.1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's

report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the motions. Thomas v.

Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). 

However, the Court has reviewed the MJRR and agrees with the magistrate

judge. That is, plaintiff did not present new and material evidence which would require

a remand. Accordingly, the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are

ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Plaintiff’s motion for remand is

DENIED.

The parties’ cross motions for summary judgment continue before the magistrate

judge.

SO ORDERED.

S/Avern Cohn 

AVERN COHN

Dated: July 21, 2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 Detroit, Michigan

2

2:14-cv-14458-AC-APP Doc # 34 Filed 07/21/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 959
EXHIBIT 32.2

                        ICY SPLASH FOOD & BEVERAGE, INC.
    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Icy Splash Food & Beverage, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles
Tokarz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Icy Splash Food & Beverage, Inc. and will be retained by Icy Splash
Food & Beverage, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

Date:  August 20, 2004

 /s/ Charles Tokarz
Charles Tokarz
Chief Financial Officer
# C_2011130EN.01001503.xml

| 30.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/15

---

Action brought on 16 February 2011 — Apollo Tyres v OHIM — Endurance Technologies (ENDURACE)

(Case T-109/11)

2011/C 130/28

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Apollo Tyres AG (Baden, Switzerland) (represented by: S. Szilvasi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Endurance Technologies Pvt Ltd (Aurangabad, India)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 25 November 2010 in case R 625/2010-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 25 November 2010 in case R 625/2010-1;

| — | Order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘ENDURACE’, for goods in class 12 and services in classes 35 and 37 — Community trade mark application No 6419824

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 5819149 of the figurative mark ‘ENDURANCE’ and device in colours, for goods in class 12

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Partially rejected the Community trade mark application

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Rejected the applicant’s appeal and partially allowed the opponents’ request submitted under Article 8(3) RPBoA (1), and as a result partially rejected the Community trade mark application

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

1

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal wrongly found that there was likelihood of confusion.

Pleas in law:

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 216/96, of 5 February 1996, laying down the rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2082/2004, of 6 December 2004

1

---
#### § 167.65-65 Notice and reporting of casualty and voyage records.

The requirements for providing notice and reporting of marine casualties and for retaining voyage records are contained in part 4 of this chapter.

[CGD 84-099, 52 FR 47536, Dec. 14, 1987]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending October 22, 2005

|Filer               | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|BUTLER BANCORP, MHC | * 3A1* 3A3    | Application by Butler Bancorp, MHC and Butler Bancorp, Inc., both of Lowell, Massachusetts, to become a mutual bank holding company and a stock bank holding company, respectively, by acquiring Butler Bank, Lowell, Massachusetts, pursuant to section 3(a)(1) and section 3(a)(3) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:10/14/2005
|Newspaper:          | Not available
|Federal Register:   | 10/14/2005   
|SALEM FIVE BANCORP  | * 3A1* 3A3    | Section 3(a)(1) and 3(a)(3) application by Salem Five Bancorp, Salem, Massachusetts to become a mutual bank holding company through the acquisition of Salem Five Cents Savings Bank, Salem, Massachusetts, and immediately thereafter to acquire Heritage Co-operative Bank, Salem, Massachusetts.                                       | Newspaper:11/05/2005Federal Register:11/04/2005   
|Newspaper:          | 11/05/2005   
|Federal Register:   | 11/04/2005   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
07IGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

BRYAN ARVIDSON, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

OP 22-0407 

CAPTAIN BRADLEY BRAGG, Lewis 

& Clark County Detention Center, 

Respondent. 

AUG 1 6 2022 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme Court 

State of Montane 

ORDER 

Bryan Arvidson has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, indicating that his 

incarceration is illegal. He explains that he was arrested on October 1, 2021, and that he 

has been refused mental health services and an evaluation. He requests that he receive free 

mental health services as well as a new trial. According to his attachments, Arvidson has 

court-appointed counsel, per a March 3, 2022 letter. 

This Court secured a copy of the register of actions from the Lewis and Clark 

County District Court. In April 2022, Arvidson was tried on eleven felony charges, 

including mitigated deliberate homicide. Arvidson is currently awaiting sentencing. 

Arvidson's remedy is not with this Court, and it is not by means of a petition for 

habeas corpus. Habeas corpus affords an applicant an opportunity to challenge collaterally 

the legality of his present incarceration. Section 46-22-101(1), MCA; Lott v. State, 2006 

MT 279, ¶ 14, 334 Mont. 270, 150 P.3d. 337. The cause of Arvidson's incarceration is the 

criminal case for which he is awaiting sentencing and the issuance of the written, final 

judgment. 

Arvidson has appointed counsel to represent him in District Court. Arvidson should 

refrain from filing pleadings on his own behalf with this Court while he is represented by 

counsel in the District Court. M. R. App. P. 10(1)(c). 

08/16/2022

Case Number: OP 22-0407
Arvidson has not demonstrated that he is illegally incarcerated. Section 

46-22-101(1), MCA. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that Arvidson's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to: the Honorable Kathy Seeley, 

First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County; Angie Sparks, Clerk of District 

Court, Lewis and Clark County, under Cause No. DC-2021-475; Captain Bragg, Jail 

Commander; Leo Gallagher, Lewis and Clark County Attorney; Suzanne R. Sebum, 

Defense Counsel; counsel of record, and Bryan Arvidson personally. 

DATED this -‘4-1 ay of August, 2022. 

2 

Chief Justice
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Bureau of Industry and Security

The Transportation and Related Equipment Technical Advisory Committee will meet on May 2, 2007, 9:30 a.m., in the Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 6087B, 14th Street between Pennsylvania & Constitution Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration with respect to technical questions that affect the level of export controls applicable to transportation and related equipment or technology.

## Agenda

1. Welcome and Introductions.

2. Conduct Election of New Chairman.

3. Status Reports by Category Chairman.

4. Regulation Update.

5. Missile Technology Issues for TRANSTAC.

6. Wassenaar Results and Issues for TRANSTAC.

7. Proposals Consideration and Discussion.

8. Follow-up on Open Action Items.

9. Closing Comments.

                    The meeting will be open to the public and a limited number of seats will be available. Reservation are not accepted. To the extent time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any time before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public presentation materials to Committee members, the Committee suggests that presenters forward the public presentation materials to Yvette Springer at                     *Yspringer@bis.doc.gov.*

For more information contact Ms. Springer on (202) 482-2813.

Dated: April 25, 2007.

Yvette Springer,

Committee Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-2118 Filed 4-30-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-JT-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank of the United States

# ACTION:

Notice of a Partially Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

# Time and Place:

Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 9:30 a.m. The meeting will be held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.

# Open Agenda Item:

Revisions to the Economic Impact Procedures. 

# Public Participation:

The meeting will be open to public participation for Item No. 1 only.

# Further Information:

For further information, contact: Office of the Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571 (Telephone 202-565-3957).

Howard A. Schweitzer,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 07-1904  Filed 4-12-07; 3:24 pm]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LYNDON SCHEVECK

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

CITY OF BOISE , et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 17

- 35294

D.C. No. 1:16

- cv

- 00036

- EJL

- REB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho Edward J. Lodge , District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 18, 2017 **

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE , Circuit Judges

. Lyndon Scheveck appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismiss ing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging claims arising from his arrest . We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 22 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 1 7

- 35294

dismissal on the basis of the statute of limitations

. Canatella v. Van De Kamp , 486

F.3d 1 128, 1132 (9th Cir. 2007) . We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Scheveck’s action as time

- barred

because Scheveck did not submit to the court any document that function ed as a

complaint before the applicable statute of limitations had run

. See Idaho Code § 5

-

2 19(4) (two

- year statute of limitations for personal injury claims); Canatella

, 486

F .3 d at 1132 ( the forum state’s personal injury stat ute of limitations applies in

§ 1983 suits ) ; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 3 ( “A civil action is commenced by filing a

complaint with the court.”); cf. Hauschulz v. State, Dep’t of Corr. , 147 P.3d 94, 98

-

99 (Idaho Ct. App. 2006) ( holding that a filing explicitly intended to function as a

complaint and submitted to the court clerk’s office is sufficient to initiate action).

W e do not consider arguments or allegations raised for the first time on

appeal , including Scheveck’s contention regarding equitable estoppel

. See Smith v.

Marsh , 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999).

AFFIRMED.
#### § 169.705 Mooring equipment.

Each vessel must be fitted with ground tackle and hawsers deemed necessary by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, depending upon the size of the vessel and the waters on which it operates.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.151-45 Equipment required for servicing facilities. Each servicing facility approved by the Coast Guard must maintain equipment to carry out the operations described in the manufacturer's servicing manual approved in accordance with § 160.151-35(b)(1), including— ( a ) A set of plans, as specified in § 160.151-35(b)(3), for each inflatable liferaft to be serviced;
( b ) A current copy of this subpart;
( c ) A current copy of the manual approved in accordance with § 160.151-35(b)(1), including all revisions and bulletins in effect as indicated on the annual list issued in accordance with § 160.151-35(b)(2);
( d ) Hot presses (if applicable);
( e ) Safety-type glue pots or equivalents;
( f ) Abrasive devices;
( g ) A source of clean, dry, pressurized air; hoses; and attachments for inflating liferafts;
( h ) A source of vacuum; hoses; and attachments for deflating liferafts;
( i ) Mercury manometer, water manometer, or other pressure-measurement device or pressure gauge of equivalent accuracy and sensitivity;
( j ) Thermometer;
( k ) Barometer, aneroid or mercury;
( l ) Calibrated torque-wrench for assembling the inflation system;
( m ) Accurate weighing scale;
( n ) Repair materials and equipment, and spare parts as specified in the applicable manual, except that items of limited “shelf life” need not be stocked if they are readily available;
( o ) A complete stock of the survival equipment required to be stowed in the liferafts, except for items of equipment that are readily available;
( p ) A means for load-testing davit-launched liferafts, unless the facility services only non-davit-launched liferafts;
( q ) A supply of parts for all inflation components and valves specified in the applicable manual; and
( r ) A tool board that clearly indicates where each small tool is stored, or has an equivalent means to make sure that no tools are left in the liferaft when repacked.