alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

RALPH H. BOOTH, II, an individual, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:15-cv-11760-RHC-APP 

 Hon. Robert H. Cleland 

 vs. 

TIMOTHY SAMMONS, INC., 

an inactive New York company; and 

TIMOTHY SAMMONS LTD., 

an England and Wales limited company, 

and TIMOTHY SAMMONS, an individual, 

 Defendants. 

ABBOTT NICHOLSON, P.C. 

By: William D. Gilbride, Jr. (P36830) 

And: Sarah L. Harwood (P74931) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

300 River Place, Suite 3000 

Detroit, Michigan 48207-4225 

Phone: (313) 566-2500 

Fax: (313) 566-2502 

wdgilbride@abbottnicholson.com 

slharwood@abbottnicholson.com 

 

EX PARTE ORDER TO ALLOW SERVICE 

OF PROCESS BY SUBSTITUTED MEANS. 

 This matter having come before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion 

for Alternate Service, and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises; 

NOW, THEREFORE 

2:15-cv-11760-RHC-APP Doc # 10 Filed 08/14/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 83
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion for Alternate 

Service shall be and is hereby GRANTED; 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff may effectuate service of process 

upon Defendant TIMOTHY SAMMONS, INC., in the following manner: 

A. By sending the Summons and copy of the Complaint, by email to the 

email domain address, tss@timothy-sammons.com; and 

B. By sending the Summons and a copy of the Complaint through first 

class mail to 2209 Merrick Road, Suite 100, Merrick, NY 11566 and 

19 East 66th Street, New York, NY 10065. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 14, 2015 

S/Robert H. Cleland 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Order prepared by: 

ABBOTT NICHOLSON, P.C. 

William D. Gilbride, Jr. (P36830) 

Sarah L. Harwood (P74931) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

300 River Place, Suite 3000 

Detroit, Michigan 48207-4225 

(313) 566-2500 / (313) 566-2502 Fax 

wdgilbride@abbottnicholson.com 

slharwood@abbottnicholson.com 

4830-6904-7078, v. 1 

2:15-cv-11760-RHC-APP Doc # 10 Filed 08/14/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 84
Form of Bonus Election Agreement



 Exhibit 10.3 
  
 BONUS ELECTION AGREEMENT 
  
 This Bonus Election Agreement (“Bonus Election Agreement”) is entered into by and between Camden National Corporation (the “Company”)
and
                                        
(“Participant”), who is an eligible employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, pursuant to the terms of the Company’s Management Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) which is a component plan of the Camden National
Corporation 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. The Plan provisions are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety and supersede any conflicting provisions contained in this Bonus Election Agreement. Neither this Bonus Election Agreement
nor the Plan shall be construed as giving Participant any right to continue to be employed by or perform services for the Company or any subsidiary or affiliate thereof. 
  
 1. ELECTION TO RECEIVE RESTRICTED SHARES 
  
 Participant [CHECK ONE]              is required to or
             elects to receive restricted shares of the Company’s Common Stock (“Restricted Shares”) in lieu of [CHECK ONE]
             10 percent or              20 percent of Participant’s annual incentive bonus which is based upon
services to be performed during the calendar year specified in Section 2. Participant will be fully vested in the Restricted Shares two years after the date such Restricted Shares are awarded, provided that Participant has maintained employment with
the Company or any of its subsidiaries for such two-year period. 
  
 2.
ELECTION PERIOD 
  
 This election is entirely contingent
on the amount of the annual incentive bonus actually awarded with respect to              and each succeeding calendar year until Participant makes a new election or revokes this
election as described below. This Bonus Election Agreement must be received by the Company no later than December 31 of the calendar year prior to the calendar year during which the annual incentive bonus will be paid, or by such other time or times
selected by the Administrator in its sole discretion. and will become irrevocable on such date. This Bonus Election Agreement will remain in effect for all subsequent years until Participant makes a new Bonus Election Agreement or revokes this Bonus
Election Agreement. 
  

			
	CAMDEN NATIONAL CORPORATION	 	PARTICIPANT
		
	                                      
                                        
                          	 	                                      
                                        
                          
		
	Name:
                                        
                                        
            	 	Name:
                                        
                                        
            
		
	Title:
                                        
                                        
              	 	Title:
                                        
                                        
              
		
	Date Received:
                                        
                                      	 	Date:
LOS_ANGELES/#10535.1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

CHRISTOPHER D. FRENTZOS, on behalf of 

himself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, INC., aka 

NAVIENT DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

LOAN SERVICING,

Defendant.

No. 2:15-cv-11518-GER-MKM

Judge Gerald E. Rosen

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties to dismiss 

this case with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the entire 

case is dismissed with prejudice as to the named Plaintiff, and without prejudice as to the 

putative class. Each party shall bear its own costs and expenses.

Dated: November 20, 2015 s/Gerald E. Rosen

Chief Judge, United States District Court

Case 2:15-cv-11518-GER-MKM ECF No. 18 filed 11/20/15 PageID.204 Page 1 of 1
§ 28.345 Electrical standards for vessels less than 79 feet (24 meters) in length. ( a ) A vessel less than 79 feet (24 meters) in length with an alternating current electrical distribution system may comply with the requirements of ABYC E-8 and either paragraph (c) or (d) of this section, as applicable, in lieu of meeting the requirements of §§ 28.350 through 28.370.
( b ) A vessel less than 79 feet (24 meters) in length with a direct current system may comply with the requirements of ABYC E-1, ABYC E-9, and either paragraph (c) or (d) of this section, as applicable, in lieu of meeting the requirements of §§ 28.350 through 28.370.
( c ) In addition to paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, the vessel may comply with the requirements of NFPA 302, chapters 7 and 8.
( d ) In addition to paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, the vessel may comply with the requirements of 33 CFR part 183, subpart I and § 28.370.
# C_2011282EN.01002302.xml

| 24.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/23

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 29 July 2011 — Cemex and Others v Commission

(Case T-292/11 R)

(Interim measures - Competition - Request for information Article 18(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Application for suspension of application - Lack of urgency)

2011/C 282/48

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Cemex S.A.B. de C.V. (Monterrey, Mexico), New Sunward Holding BV (Amsterdam, The Netherlands), Cemex España, SA (Madrid, Spain), CEMEX Deutschland AG (Ratingen, Germany), Cemex UK (Egham, Surrey, United Kingdom), CEMEX Czech Operations s.r.o. (Prague, Czech Republic), Cemex France Gestion (Rungis, France) and CEMEX Austria AG (Langenzersdorf, Austria) (represented by: J. Folguera Crespo, P. Vidal Martínez, H. González Durántez and B. Martínez, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier, F. Castilla Contreras and C. Hödlmayr, acting as Agents, assisted by J. Rivas, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of application of Commission Decision C(2001) 2360 final of 30 March 2011 in proceedings pursuant to Article 18(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (Case COMP/39.520 — Cement and related products).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for suspension of application is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for suspension of application is rejected.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
§ 201.181 General matters. ( a ) In general, the functions of the Administration involve hearing procedures comparable to those of a court and accordingly parties to proceedings before the Administration and persons representing these parties are expected to conduct themselves with honor and dignity. For the same reasons, the members of the Administration and those of its employees who participate with the Administration in the determination of formal proceedings are expected to conduct themselves with the same fidelity to standards of propriety that characterizes a court and its staff. The standing and the effectiveness of the Administration are in direct relation to the observance by it, its staff and the parties and attorneys appearing before it of the highest of judicial and professional ethics.
( b ) It is essential in cases to be determined after notice and hearing and upon a record, or in any other cases which the Administration by order may designate, that the judicial character of the Administration be recognized and protected. As a consequence, from the time of the filing of an application or a petition which can be granted by the Administration only after notice and opportunity for hearing, or in the case of other matters from the time of notice by the Administration that such matters shall be determined after notice and opportunity for hearing, no ex parte communications, as hereinafter defined, are to constitute or be considered part of the record on which the final decision is to be predicated.
#### § 168.05-10 Subdivision and stability.

Each vessel must meet the applicable requirements in Subchapter S of this chapter.

[CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51010, Nov. 4, 1983]
2:15-cr-20093-MOB-APP Doc # 12 Filed 02/09/15 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 78
2:15-cr-20093-MOB-APP Doc # 12 Filed 02/09/15 Pg 2 of 5 Pg ID 79
2:15-cr-20093-MOB-APP Doc # 12 Filed 02/09/15 Pg 3 of 5 Pg ID 80
2:15-cr-20093-MOB-APP Doc # 12 Filed 02/09/15 Pg 4 of 5 Pg ID 81
2:15-cr-20093-MOB-APP Doc # 12 Filed 02/09/15 Pg 5 of 5 Pg ID 82
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of Axonyx Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Gosse B. Bruinsma, M.D, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
|   | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Gosse B. Bruinsma, M.D.           |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Gosse B. Bruinsma, M.D                |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

November 8, 2005 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.1

                                  IDACORP, Inc.
                               Idaho Power Company
                        NEO 2005 Base Compensation Table

                                            Current Base          New Base
Name                 Title                Compensation ($)    Compensation ($)
----                 -----                ----------------    ----------------

Jan B. Packwood      President and             580,000             630,000
                     Chief Executive
                     Officer, IDACORP
                     and Chief
                     Executive Officer,
                     Idaho Power

J. LaMont Keen       Executive Vice            350,000             380,000
                     President, IDACORP
                     and President and
                     Chief Operating
                     Officer, Idaho
                     Power

Darrel T. Anderson   Senior Vice               210,000             240,000
                     President -
                     Administrative
                     Services and Chief
                     Financial Officer,
                     IDACORP and Idaho
                     Power

Thomas R. Saldin     Senior Vice               250,000             250,000
                     President, General
                     Counsel and
                     Secretary, IDACORP
                     and Idaho Power

James C. Miller      Senior Vice               250,000             270,000
                     President of Power
                     Supply, Idaho Power


A. Bryan Kearney     Vice President and        183,000             193,000
                     Chief Information
                     Officer, IDACORP
                     and Idaho Power
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001007800
<NAME> SIPEX CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,355
<SECURITIES>                                    42,484
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,282
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,280
<INVENTORY>                                     23,128
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,731
<PP&E>                                          49,137
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,303
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,694
<BONDS>                                            413
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           218
<OTHER-SE>                                     104,883
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,795
<SALES>                                         89,820
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,820
<CGS>                                           57,227
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,227
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,402
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   617
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,680
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,419
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,099
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,099
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

On May 7, 2018, Kanee Goode filed a pro se motion to vacate her sentence under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2255. (ECF No. 280.) She claims defense counsel was constitutionally ineffective in numerous 

respects, including that “counsel failed to file a notice of appeal after sentencing.” (Id.) The Court 

ordered the government to file a response (ECF No. 283), the government did so (ECF No. 287), 

and the Court ordered an evidentiary hearing limited to the issue of whether Goode’s trial counsel 

ignored Goode’s instruction to file a notice of appeal (ECF No. 289). Now, the government has 

filed a motion asking to waive attorney-client privilege so that the government can interview 

Goode’s counsel about the ineffective assistance of counsel claim she raises. (ECF No. 293.) 

“To be sure, litigants cannot hide behind the [attorney-client] privilege if they are relying 

upon privileged communications to make their case.” In re Lott, 424 F.3d 446, 454 (6th Cir. 2005). 

Thus, the attorney-client privilege “may be implicitly waived by claiming ineffective assistance of 

counsel or by otherwise raising issues regarding counsel’s performance.” Id. at 452–53. But 

“[i]mplied waivers are consistently construed narrowly,” and “[c]ourts must impose a waiver no 

broader than needed to ensure the fairness of the proceedings before it.” Id. at 453 (internal 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 

v. 

 

KANEE GOODE, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 15-20007 

Honorable Laurie J. Michelson 

ORDER GRANTING GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO WAIVE 

ATTORNEY/CLIENT PRIVILEGE [293] 
2 

quotation marks and citations omitted). Thus, “the waiver in habeas cases should be limited to the 

extent necessary to litigate a petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims.” Id. at 454 

(quoting Mason v. Mitchell, 293 F.Supp. 2d 819, 823–24 (N.D. Ohio 2003). 

Here, the government asks to waive Goode’s attorney-client privilege, “so that the 

government can conduct an interview of trial counsel and obtain any necessary information . . . 

limited to the issues presented in claim One of the § 2255 petition.” (ECF No. 293, PageID.4328.) 

The Court finds that the government’s request is necessary to litigate Goode’s ineffective 

assistance of counsel claim and that this narrow waiver is no broader than necessary. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the government’s motion to have the court 

waive the attorney/client privilege is GRANTED to the extent that the government will be 

permitted to question Goode’s counsel limited to the issues of effective assistance of counsel raised 

in Goode’s § 2255 petition. 

SO ORDERED. 

s/Laurie J. Michelson 

LAURIE J. MICHELSON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Date: December 4, 2018 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record 

and/or pro se parties on this date, December 4, 2018, using the Electronic Court Filing system 

and/or first-class U.S. mail. 

s/William Barkholz 

Case Manager
#### § 702.16 Attendance of news media at public sessions.

Reasonable access for coverage of public sessions shall be provided to the various communications media, including newspapers, magazines, radio, newsreels, and television, subject to the physical limitations of the room in which the session is held and consideration of the physical comfort of Commission members, staff, and witnesses. However, no witnesses shall be televised, filmed, or photographed during the session nor shall the testimony of any witness be broadcast or recorded for broadcasting if the witness objects.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         867,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               37,937,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,035,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,755,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            42,604,000
<PP&E>                                      92,329,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              39,345,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             111,774,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       24,038,000
<BONDS>                                    128,077,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       21,441,000
<PREFERRED>                                 19,591,000
<COMMON>                                       995,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (86,940,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               111,774,000
<SALES>                                     71,997,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            71,997,000
<CGS>                                       50,596,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               50,596,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            23,056,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,532,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (8,187,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (1,653,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (6,534,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (5.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (5.24)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 3 

2:14-cv-11700-PDB-MJH Doc # 1-4 Filed 04/29/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 106
Exhibit 3 - Head Diagnosis Appendix

Rico 

Event

Claim 

Number Provider Group Physician Name DOL 1st DX of head injury Prior 

he

3 22B063010 Tete Oniango 11/10/2009 1/4/2010 

11 22B019145 Tete Oniango 7/27/2009 1/15/2010 12 22B127918 Michigan Visiting Physicians Martin Quiroga / Ram Gunabalan 1/6/2010 1/20/2010 

8 22B076391 Choice House Call Martin Quiroga 12/14/2009 4/21/2010 

144 22B141543 Mundy Pain Clinic Martin Quiroga 4/23/2010 5/20/2010 

17 22B161602 Medical Evaluations James Beale 6/18/2010 6/24/2010 19 22B174406 James Beale / Deibre Claiborne 7/3/2010 7/22/2010 

142 22K360278 Mundy Pain Clinic Martin Quiroga 2/25/2010 8/17/2010 

30 22K360544 Choice House Call Martin Quiroga 9/1/2010 9/22/2010 29 22K360543 Choice House Call Martin Quiroga 9/1/2010 10/20/2010 

145 22B149710 Mundy Pain Clinic Martin Quiroga 5/18/2010 10/26/2010 

31 22C405855 Choice House Call Martin Quiroga / Andrew Ruden 10/16/2010 10/27/2010 

34 22C422110 Medical Evaluations James Beale 11/30/2010 12/16/2010 

147 22B149519 Mundy Pain Clinic Andrew Ruden / M. Awaisi 5/17/2010 2/8/2011 

37 22K360674 Medical Evaluations James Beale 2/22/2011 3/10/2011 50 22010J933 Nidal Jaboor 2/25/2011 3/23/2011 

38 22K360732 James Beale 3/15/2011 3/24/2011 

152 22010T773 Mundy Pain Clinic Sean Hoban 3/27/2011 4/7/2011 150 22K360769 Mundy Pain Clinic Martin Quiroga 4/2/2011 4/12/2011 

46 22K360796 James Beale, Md James Beale 4/13/2011 4/28/2011 

154 22016C997 Tarik Wasfie 5/6/2011 5/26/2011 

64 22169T632 Irwin Lutwin 7/28/2012 8/3/2012 

63 2219M406 Aida Khalil 4/14/2012 8/16/2012 

203 222G13017 Sean Hoban 3/1/2013 4/12/2013 

200 222D49433 Sean Hoban / Irwin Lutwin 2/9/2013 5/31/2013 

205 2218N5705 Sean Hoban 4/19/2013 5/31/2013 

86 22281N424 James Beale / Nidal Jboor 4/18/2013 6/7/2013 

202 22266P032 Sean Hoban 3/6/2013 6/21/2013 

Page 1 of 1

2:14-cv-11700-PDB-MJH Doc # 1-4 Filed 04/29/14 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 107