alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending February 11, 2006

|Filer                             | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                             
|--------------------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. | * 3A3         | Orrstown Financial Services, Inc., Shippensburg, PA, to acquire The First National Bank of Newport, Newport, PA                                                                           | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:03/09/2006
|Newspaper:                        | Not available
|Federal Register:                 | 03/09/2006   
|TOWER BANCORP INC.                | 4c8* 3A5      | Tower Bancorp, Inc., Greencastle, PA, to acquire FNB Financial Corporation, McConnellsburg, and its wholly own subsidiary, The First National Bank of McConnellsburg, McConnellsburg, PA. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:03/13/2006
|Newspaper:                        | Not available
|Federal Register:                 | 03/13/2006   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
#### James C. Jewett and others, *Appellants, v.*William C. Pickersgill *Respondent*.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
#### Ibikunle Sunday FAYEMI, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Muriel K. OFFERMAN, in his individual capacity; Ron Starling, in his individual capacity; David J. Adinolf, in his individual capacity, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 03-7828.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 19, 2004.

Decided: June 2, 2004.

*481Ibikunle Sunday Fayemi, Appellant pro se.

Before WILLIAMS, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Ibikunle Sunday Fayemi appeals from a district court judgment summarily dismissing as barred by the statute of limitations his civil rights action against North Carolina officials charging that money was seized in violation of his right to due process. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We agree with the district court that the action is barred by the statute of limitations. Accordingly, we affirm.

We review a § 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal de novo. *De’Lonta v. Angelone,*330 F.3d 630, 633 (4th Cir.2003). There is no statute of limitations provided in § 1983; rather, federal courts apply the forum state’s “most analogous” statute of limitations, generally the statute applicable to personal injury actions. *See Owens v. Okure,*488 U.S. 235, 109 S.Ct. 573, 102 L.Ed.2d 594 (1989); *Wilson v. Garcia,*471 U.S. 261, 276, 105 S.Ct. 1938, 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985). However, the date the cause of action accrues is determined under federal law. *National Adver. Co. v. City of Raleigh,*947 F.2d 1158, 1162 (4th Cir.1991). In North Carolina, the statute of limitations for actions under 42 U.S.C.1983 (2000) is three years. *Love v. Alamance County Bd. of Educ.,*757 F.2d 1504, 1506 (4th Cir.1985). Under federal law, a cause of action accrues and the statute of limitations commences “when the plaintiff possesses sufficient facts about the harm done to him that reasonable inquiry will reveal his cause of action.” *See Nasim v. Warden, Md. House of Corr.,*64 F.3d 951, 955 (4th Cir.1995).

We find the cause of action accrued at least by July 15, 1999, if not earlier, when Fayemi was informed by the district court that the money was turned over to the North Carolina Department of Revenue. Because Fayemi’s action was filed no earlier than July 24, 2003, that action is barred by the three-year statute of limitations.

Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
§ 174.015 Intact stability. ( a ) Except as provided in § 174.020, in each condition of loading and operation, each barge must be shown by design calculations to have an area under the righting arm curve up to the angle of maximum righting arm, the downflooding angle, or 40 degrees, whichever angle is smallest, equal to or greater than— ( 1 ) 15 foot-degrees (4.57 meter-degrees) for ocean and Great Lakes winter service; and
( 2 ) 10 foot-degrees (3.05 meter-degrees) for lakes, bays, sounds, and Great Lakes summer service.
( b ) For the purpose of this section, downflooding angle means the static angle from the intersection of the vessel's centerline and waterline in calm water to the first opening that does not close watertight automatically.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 09454

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name Description

x 09454\09454_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09454\09454_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

09454\09454_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 09454\09454_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09454\09454_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09454\09454_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09454\09454_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09454\09454_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

09454\Certification Statement_09454.pdf Plant certification statement

x 09454\Follow-up\Follow-up_1st_reviewer_02-01-11.pdf Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 09454\Supporting Documentation\09454_PartA_A5-2_map-1_Avon Lake.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09454\Supporting Documentation\09454_PartA_A5-3_Avon Lake.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09454\Supporting Documentation\09454_PartD_D3-1_Avon Lake.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09454\09454_Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
EXHIBIT 10.10


Summary of Comprehensive  Credit  Facilities  Agreement of Maximum Amount by and
between  Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. (the  "Company") and Longgang  Division,
Shenzhen Branch, Agricultural Bank of China ("Agricultural Bank of China") dated
as of April 5, 2004.

         The contract  number for this  agreement is Shenzhen  Longgang  Nongyin
Shouzi No.  200402370001.  The contract  term is April 5, 2004 to April 5, 2005,
and the amount of credit to be  extended  by  Agricultural  Bank of China is RMB
200,000,000  Yuan.  Remedies  in the  event of breach of  contract  include  the
adjustment of the credit  amount,  the  suspension of credit,  the imposition of
punitive interest and overdue interest, an increase of guarantee deposit and the
call back of principal and interest before maturity. The agreement also provides
that the Company cannot make a distribution to its shareholders  before the loan
is paid in full.  It also provides that the Company must grant a mortgage to the
Agricultural  Bank of China  upon  obtaining  a  certificate  of  title  for Bak
Industrial Park.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>                                  5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-2000
<CASH>                                           7,164
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,905
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    102,274
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               193,194
<PP&E>                                          33,827
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 317,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          141,156
<BONDS>                                        176,327
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           55,128
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (121,287)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   317,861
<SALES>                                        408,220
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               408,220
<CGS>                                          328,469
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  328,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,293
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (30,057)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,201
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (35,254)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (9,194)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (44,448)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (688.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (688.38)



</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

NANCY GUCWA, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JEFFREY LAWLEY, ET AL.,

Defendants.

Case No. 15-10815

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT

JUDGE ARTHUR J. TARNOW

MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANTHONY P.

PATTI

 /

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT AGER’S REQUEST TO ADJOURN HEARING [68]

All Defendants in this case have filed Motions to Dismiss [Dkt. #27, 32, 33,

34, 36]. On September 30, 2015, the Court scheduled a hearing on the Motions to

Dismiss for November 16, 2015. On that date, the Court held a status conference

with counsel for all parties and adjourned the hearing, to be rescheduled after

counsel reported a decision by a workers’ compensation agency. On January 20,

2016, Plaintiffs’ counsel sent the Court an update on the workers’ compensation

proceedings and a request to promptly reschedule the hearing. On January 26,

2016, the Court set a new hearing on the Motions to Dismiss for March 11, 2016. 

1 of 2

2:15-cv-10815-AJT-APP Doc # 71 Filed 02/25/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 961
On February 23, 2016, the Court entered a Stipulated Order [69] replacing

attorney Joseph Wright with attorney Dale Robinson (of the same firm) as counsel

for Defendant Ager. The same day, attorney Robinson filed, on Defendant Ager’s

behalf, a Request to Adjourn Hearing [68]. Robinson explains that he needs time

to familiarize himself with this case and that he is scheduled to be out of the state

on the date of the hearing. Later that day, Plaintiffs filed a Response [70] opposing

Defendant Ager’s request to adjourn the hearing. 

The Court declines to adjourn the hearing. Although the Court attempts to

accommodate the scheduling preferences of counsel, it is not obligated to do

so—particularly with respect to preferences raised shortly before an already

scheduled hearing. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Ager’s Request to Adjourn Hearing [68] is

DENIED. A hearing on Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss [27, 32, 33, 34, 36] remains

scheduled for March 11, 2016. 

SO ORDERED.

s/Arthur J. Tarnow 

Arthur J. Tarnow

Dated: February 25, 2016 Senior United States District Judge

2:15-cv-10815-AJT-APP Doc # 71 Filed 02/25/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 962
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

 Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

On Friday, April 6, 2007 (72 FR 17136), the Department of Defense published a notice of a meeting of the President's Commission on Care for America's Returning Wounded Warriors. This notice makes corrections to that notice as follows:

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON SUBMITTING STATEMENTS CONTACT:

                        Col. Denise Dailey                               ( print page 18209)                            or Adrianne Holloway, toll free (Change from previous submission) 877-588-2035 or Fax statements (703) 588-2046.                    

## 13 April 2007

#### (Change from previous submission)

On 13 April a Sub-Committee of the Commission will visit Bethesda, Naval Hospital. All other information remains unchanged.

Dated: April 5, 2007.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.

[FR Doc. 07-1790 Filed 4-10-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
#### Samuel L. Jones, Appellant, *v.*George B. Dusenberre, *Respondent*.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Opinion by

Hardin, J.;

Smith, P. J., not voting.
SUPREME COURT.

#### John Murphy and another, appellants, agt. James F. Keyes, impleaded, &c., respondent.

*General Term, October*30, 1874.

*Stipulation to stay.*

A stipulation to stay proceedings under a judgment until the appeal from the same should he determined is to he interpreted reasonably, and an order to set aside execution issued in violation of the terms of such stipulation should he affirmed.

Daniels, *J.*

— Mo doubt can be entertained but that, the reasonable import of the stipulation stayed the proceedings in this and the other cause pending in this court, upon an • appeal being taken from the judgment recovered in the superior court. That appeal was taken, and from that time this and the other cause in this court were to abide its event. The tenor and effect of the stipulation was that all proceedings in these causes should remain suspended until that appeal should be determined. The order setting aside the executions issued in violation of the terms of the stipulation was right, and it should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs to the respondent and disbursements on the appeal.

Davis, P. J., and Lawrence, J., concurred.
|   | Jurisdiction      of |
|--------|----------------------|
| Name   | Incorporation        |

| Matria      Health Enhancement Company                               | Delaware                                          |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                 | Quality      Oncology, Inc.                       | Delaware |
|                                                                 | Miavita,      Inc.                                | Georgia |
|                                                                 | WinningHabits,      Inc.                          | Delaware |
|                                                                 | *WinningHabits      GP, Inc.                      | Delaware |
|                                                                 | *WinningHabits      LP, Inc.                      | Delaware |
|                                                                 | *WinningHabits.com,      Ltd.                     | Texas |
|                                                                 | *Matria      Case Management, Inc.                | Georgia |
| Matria      Women’s and Children’s Health, LLC (formerly |
| Matria      Healthcare, Inc.)                                        | Delaware                                          |
|                                                                 | Matria      of New York, Inc.                     | New      York |
|                                                                 | Matria      Healthcare of Illinois, Inc.          | Georgia |
|                                                                 | *National      Reproductive Medical Centers, Inc. | Delaware |
| *Diabetes      Acquisition, Inc.                                     | Georgia                                           |
|                                                                 | *Diabetes      Self Care, Inc.                    | Virginia |
|                                                                 | *Matria      Laboratories, Inc.                   | Delaware |
| *Shared      Care, Inc.                                              | Georgia                                           |

----
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 45, PageID.523 Filed 07/19/16 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 45, PageID.524 Filed 07/19/16 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 45, PageID.525 Filed 07/19/16 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 45, PageID.526 Filed 07/19/16 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:14-cv-13005-AC-MKM ECF No. 45, PageID.527 Filed 07/19/16 Page 5 of 5
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 229 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 229

      To provide for the retention of the name of Mount McKinley.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2009

Mr. Ryan of Ohio (for himself and Ms. Sutton) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To provide for the retention of the name of Mount McKinley.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RETENTION OF NAME OF MOUNT MCKINLEY.

    Notwithstanding any other authority of law, the mountain located 63 
degrees 04 minutes 12 seconds north, by 151 degrees 00 minutes 18 
seconds west shall continue to be named and referred to for all 
purposes as Mount McKinley.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    In accordance with § 271.25 of its rules regarding availability of information (12 CFR part 271), there is set forth below the domestic policy directive issued by the Federal Open Market Committee at its meeting held on March 20-21, 2007.1

                    The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output.  To further its long-run objectives, the Committee in the immediate future seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with maintaining the federal funds rate at an average of around 5                    1/4                     percent.                

By order of the Federal Open Market Committee, April 12, 2007.

Vincent R. Reinhart,

Secretary, Federal Open Market Committee.

# Footnotes

1.                             Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee meeting on March 20-21, 2007, which includes the domestic policy directive issued at the meeting, are available upon request to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 20551.  The minutes are published in the Federal Reserve Bulletin and in the Board's annual report.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 07-1942 Field 4-16-07; 1:46 pm]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S