alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE> 1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Household Finance Corporation
Household Consumer Loan Corporation
Household Consumer Loan Trust 1996-1

<S>                                         <C>

Original Principal Class A     638,400,000.00
Number of Class A Bonds            638,400.00
(000's)
Original Principal Class B     136,244,640.00
Number of Class B Bond             136,244.64
(000's)
Original Principal Certificate  25,455,360.00
Number of Certificate Bond          25,455.36
(000's)

                                                  1999 Totals
CLASS A
Principal Distribution                              57,754,900.03
Interest Distribution                               10,404,547.86

CLASS B
Principal Distribution                              28,261,386.57
Interest Distribution                                7,387,505.60

Certificates
Principal Distribution                              14,516,892.73
Interest Distribution                                  924,523.68


</TABLE>
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
Data Series 525
EAARL Coastal       Topography�Gateway National Recreation Area, New Jersey and New York,       2009                  Acronyms and       Abbreviations       ACRONYM ORABBREVIATION            DEFINITION            ALPS            Airborne Lidar Processing             System            ASCII            American Standard Code for Information             Interchange            ASPRS            American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote             Sensing            BA            Bathymetry            BE            Bare Earth            CIR            Color Infrared            CLICK            Center for Lidar Information             Coordination and Knowledge            cm            Centimeter(s)            CMGP            Coastal and Marine Geology Program            DEM            Digital Elevation Model            DOQQ            Digital Orthophoto Quarter-Quadrangle            DSM            Digital Surface Model            DVD            Digital Versatile Disc            EAARL            Experimental Advanced Airborne Research Lidar            ESRI            Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.            FGDC            Federal Geographic Data Committee            FS            First Surface            GB            Gigabyte(s)            GeoTIFF            Georeferenced Tagged Image File Format            GIS            Geographic Information System            GPS            Global Positioning System            HTML            Hypertext Markup Language            kHz            Kilohertz            LAS            Log ASCII             Standard            lidar            Light Detection and Ranging            m            Meter(s)            NASA            National Aeronautics and Space           Administration            NAD83            North American Datum 1983            NAVD88            North American Vertical Datum 1988            nm            Nanometer(s)            NPS            National Park Service            RCF            Random-Consensus Filter            RGB            Red-Green-Blue            ST            Submerged Topography            TIF            Tagged Image File            USGS            U.S. Geological             Survey            UTM            Universal Transverse Mercator            WGS84            World Geodetic System 1984            XML            Extensible Markup Language
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: pubs.usgs.gov /ds/525/html/acronyms.htmlPage Contact Information: FeedbackPage Last Modified: Friday, 27-Aug-2010 09:50:36 EDT
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7954

MICHAEL T. SMITH,

 Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

KENNEY ATKINSON, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Aiken. David C. Norton, District Judge. 

(1:13-cv-02582-DCN)

Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: May 6, 2014

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael T. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael T. Smith, a federal prisoner, appeals the 

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the 

magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) 

petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Atkinson, No. 

1:13-cv-02582-DCN (D.S.C. Nov. 12, 2013). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Editorial Note on Part 162
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 162.039-2 Classification. ( a ) Portable and semi-portable extinguishers must be marked with a combined number and letter designation. The letter designates the general class of fire for which the extinguisher is suitable as identified in NFPA 10 (incorporated by reference, see § 162.039-1). The number indicates the relative extinguishing potential of the device as rated by UL 711 (incorporated by reference, see § 162.039-1).
( b ) [Reserved]
[CGFR 65-9, 30 FR 11487, Sept. 8, 1965, as amended by USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48279, July 22, 2016]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

# Date and Time:

Tuesday, April 17, 2007, 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time.

# Place:

Clarence M. Mitchell, Jr. Conference Room on the Ninth Floor of the EEOC Office Building, 1801 “L” Street, NW., Washington, DC 20507.

# Status:

The meeting will be open to the public.

# Matters to be Considered:

# Open Session:

1. Announcement of Notation Votes,

2. Perspectives on Work/Family Balance and the Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Laws, and

3. Headquarters Project Management and Relocation Services Contract.

# Note:

                        In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the meeting will be open to public observation of the Commission's deliberations and voting. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC Commission meetings in the                         **Federal Register**                        , the Commission also provides a recorded announcement a full week in advance on future Commission sessions.)                    

                    Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at any                           ( print page 17908)                        time for information on these meetings. The EEOC provides sign language interpretation at Commission meetings for the hearing impaired. Requests for other reasonable accommodations may be made by using the voice and TTY numbers listed above.                

# Contact Person for More Information:

Stephen Llewellyn, Acting Executive Officer on (202) 663-4070.

This Notice Issued April 6, 2007.

Stephen Llewellyn,

Acting Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 07-1799 Filed 4-6-07; 1:03 pm]

BILLING CODE 6570-06-M
§ 193.60-1 Application. ( a ) The provisions of this subpart shall apply to all vessels other than unmanned barges.
( b ) Unmanned barges are exempted from the requirements in this subpart. However, if such barges carry on board fire axes, then such equipment shall be in accordance with this subpart for manned barges.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Cellular and Inflammatory Anaphylaxis Pathways.                    

*Date:*                         May 22, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         11:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Room 3118, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sujata Vijh, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-0985,                         *vijhs@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: April 18, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2039  Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### The New York and Western Union Telegraph Company, *Appellant., v.*Hugh J. Jewett, as *Receiver, etc., Respondent*.

Order affirmed. Opinion by

Brady, J.
# C_2011226EN.01001802.xml

| 30.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/18

---

Action brought on 1 June 2011 — European Commission v Ireland

(Case C-279/11)

2011/C 226/35

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: P. Oliver, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Ireland

Defendant:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by failing to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment of this Court in Case C-66/06 Commission v Ireland, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 260 TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to take the necessary measures to comply with the judgment of this Court in Case C-66/06 Commission v Ireland, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 260 TFEU;

| — | order Ireland to pay to the Commission a lump sum of EUR 4 174,8 multiplied by the number of days between the ruling in Case C-66/06 and either compliance by Ireland with that ruling or the judgment in the present proceedings, whichever is the sooner; |
| --- | --- |

—

order Ireland to pay to the Commission a lump sum of EUR 4 174,8 multiplied by the number of days between the ruling in Case C-66/06 and either compliance by Ireland with that ruling or the judgment in the present proceedings, whichever is the sooner;

| — | order Ireland to pay to the Commission a penalty payment of EUR 33 080,32 from the date of the judgment in the present proceedings to the date of compliance by Ireland with the ruling in Case C-66/06; and |
| --- | --- |

—

order Ireland to pay to the Commission a penalty payment of EUR 33 080,32 from the date of the judgment in the present proceedings to the date of compliance by Ireland with the ruling in Case C-66/06; and

| — | order Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Ireland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Some two and a half years after the Court’s judgment of 20 November 2008, in case C-66/06, declaring that Ireland had not adopted measures fully transposing articles 2(1) and 4(2) to (4) of Council directive 85/337/EEC (1), Ireland has still failed to take the measures necessary to comply with that judgment. Therefore, the Commission proposes that Ireland should be ordered to pay a fine and a periodic penalty payment to reflect the serious nature of that infringement and its impact on the pursuit of the objectives pursued by the Community legislature.

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment

1

OJ L 175, p. 40

---
§ 184.620 Propulsion engine control systems. ( a ) A vessel must have two independent means of controlling each propulsion engine. Control must be provided for the engine speed, direction of shaft rotation, and engine shutdown. ( 1 ) One of the means may be the ability to readily disconnect the remote engine control linkage to permit local operation.
( 2 ) A multiple engine vessel with independent remote propulsion control for each engine need not have a second means of controlling each engine.
( b ) In addition to the requirements of paragraph (a), a vessel must have a reliable means for shutting down a propulsion engine, at the main pilothouse control station, which is independent of the engine's speed control.
( c ) A propulsion engine control system, including pilothouse control, must be designed so that a loss of power to the control system does not result in an increase in shaft speed or propeller pitch.
21st Century
Holding Company
  EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 21st Century
Holding Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Peter J. Prygelski, III,
Chief Financial Officer of 21st Century
Holding Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 21st
      Century Holding Company.





By:  /s/ Peter J. Prygelski,
      IIIPeter
      J. Prygelski, III, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
      Officer)
              May
      17, 2010
§ 190.15-1 Application. ( a ) The provisions of this subpart, with the exception of § 190.15-90, shall apply to all vessels other than non-self-propelled vessels of less than 300 gross tons, contracted for on or after March 1, 1968.
( b ) Vessels contracted for prior to March 1, 1968, shall meet the requirements of § 190.15-90.
( c ) Non-self-propelled vessels of less than 300 gross tons shall not be subject to the provisions of this subpart.
AO 450 (Rev. 7/99) Judgment in a Civil Case CLOSED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

MICHAEL CHIRCO and DOMINIC MOCERI,

Plaintiff,

v.

GATEWAY OAKS, LLC, et al.,,

Defendant.

/

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Case Number: 02-73188

Honorable 

 Decision by Court. This action came to hearing before the Court. The issues have been heard

and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment be entered for the Defendants and against the

Plaintiffs.

Pursuant to Rule (77d), FRCivP

Copies have been mailed to:

Julie Greenberg, Bernard Cantor, Douglas P. LaL. Robert J. Pineau, James J. Parks

Date 9/26/05 David Weaver, Clerk of Court

s/ Jonie Parker

Deputy Clerk

2:02-cv-73188-PDB Doc # 215 Filed 08/26/05 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 5387
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the "Form 10-Q") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").
 
 I, Tracey A. Welsh, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Issuer, certify that to my knowledge:
 
 (i)
the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (ii)
the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
 
 Dated: May 13, 2011
 
 /s/ Tracey A. Welsh
 Tracey A. Welsh
 Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
# C_2012287EN.01004003.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/40

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2012 — Cristina v Commission

(Case F-83/11) (1)

1

(Civil service - Open competition - Decision of the selection board in the competition not to admit the applicant to the tests - Remedies - Court action brought without waiting for a decision on the administrative complaint - Admissibility - Specific conditions for entry to the competition - Professional experience related to the nature of the duties)

2012/C 287/74

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alma Yael Cristina (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Blot and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the chairman of the selection board in competition EPSO/AST/112/10 — Assistants (AST 3) not to admit the applicant to the tests.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders Mrs Cristina to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mrs Cristina to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 340, 19.11.2011, p. 41.

1

---
15‐1630

Servin v. New World Network International

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

SUMMARY ORDER

RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT.    CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER

JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S

LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER

THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”).    A PARTY CITING A

SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the

Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40

Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 26th day of April, two thousand

sixteen.

   

PRESENT: ROBERT D. SACK,

RICHARD C. WESLEY,

GERARD E. LYNCH,

    Circuit Judges.   

_____________________________________

JEFFREY D. SERVIN, LEONARD J. BERWICK, OSAGE

CORP., DBA FIRST CITY COMMUNICATIONS INC.,   

Plaintiffs‐Appellants,

v.     15‐1630  

NEW WORLD NETWORK INTERNATIONAL, LTD.,

NEW WORLD NETWORK USA, INC., COLUMBUS

COMMUNICATIONS, LTD., BARCLAYS BANK PLC,

Defendants‐Appellees,
MORGAN STANLEY,   

     Defendant.

_____________________________________

FOR APPELLANT:    JEFFREY D. SERVIN, pro se, Philadelphia, PA.

FOR APPELLEES: DOUGLAS H. FLAUM (Joshua M. Bennett, Jenna E.

Browning, on the brief), Paul Hastings LLP, New York,

NY.

Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the

Southern District of New York (Koeltl, J.).

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED,

ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is

AFFIRMED.   

Plaintiff‐Appellant Jeffrey D. Servin (“Servin”), proceeding pro se, appeals

the District Court’s judgment dismissing his state law tort claims against

Defendants.    Plaintiffs‐Appellants Leonard J. Berwick and First City

Communications Inc.’s appeal was previously dismissed by this Court for failure

to file an appellate brief and appendix.    We assume the parties’ familiarity with

the underlying facts, the procedural history, and the issues presented for review.   
3 

We have considered all of Servin’s arguments and find them to be without

merit.    Accordingly, we AFFIRM for substantially the reasons stated in the

District Court’s thorough and comprehensive opinion below.   

       FOR THE COURT:   

Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk
# C_2013108EN.01002302.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 February 2013 — Nitrogénművek Vegyipari v Commission

(Case T-387/11) (1)

1

(State aid - Banking sector - Loans guaranteed by Hungary and granted by a development bank - Decision declaring the aid measures partly incompatible and ordering their recovery - Private investor test)

2013/C 108/61

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nitrogénművek Vegyipari Zrt. (Pétfürdő, Hungary) (represented by: Z. Tamás and M. Le Berre, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche, P. Němečková and C. Urraca Caviedes, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2011/269/EU of 27 October 2010 on State aid C-14/09 (ex NN 17/09) granted by Hungary to Péti Nitrogénművek Zrt. (OJ 2011 L 118, p. 9).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Nitrogénművek Vegyipari Zrt. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Nitrogénművek Vegyipari Zrt. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.

1

---