alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.037-1 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) The following are incorporated by reference into this subpart: ( 1 ) “The Color Names Dictionary” in *Color: Universal Language and Dictionary of Names,* National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 440, December 1976.
( 2 ) “Development of a Laboratory Test for Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Smoke Signals,” National Bureau of Standards Report 4792, July 1956.
( b ) NBS Special Publication 440 may be obtained by ordering from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 (Order by SD Catalog No. C13.10:440).
( c ) NBS Report 4792 may be obtained from Coast Guard Headquarters. Contact Commandant (CG-ENG), Attn: Office of Design and Engineering Systems, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509.
( d ) Approval to incorporate by reference the materials listed in this section was obtained from the Director of the Federal Register on November 1 and 29, 1979. The materials are on file in the Federal Register library.
[CGD 76-048a, CGD 76-048b, 44 FR 73085, Dec. 17, 1979, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4782, Feb. 3, 1983; CGD 88-070, 53 FR 34535, Sept. 7, 1988; CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50467, Sept. 29, 1995; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50733, Sept. 27, 1996; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49237, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60156, Sept. 30, 2013]
§ 96.42 General procedures and requirements. ( a ) An Indian tribe or tribal organization applying for or receiving direct funding from the Secretary under a block grant program shall be subject to all statutory and regulatory requirements applicable to a State applying for or receiving block grant funds to the extent that such requirements are relevant to an Indian tribe or tribal organization except where otherwise provided by statute or in this part.
( b ) A tribal organization representing more than one Indian tribe will be eligible to receive block grant funds on behalf of a particular tribe only if the tribe has by resolution authorized the organization's action.
( c ) If an Indian tribe or tribal organization whose service population resides in more than one State applies for block grant funds that, by statute, are apportioned on the basis of population, the allotment awarded to the tribe or organization shall be taken from the allotments of the various States in which the service population resides in proportion to the number of eligible members or households to be served in each State. If block grant funds are required to be apportioned on the basis of grants during a base year, the allotment to the Indian tribe or tribal organization shall be taken from the allotment of the State whose base year grants included the relevant grants to the tribe or organization.
( d ) The audit required under the block grant programs shall be conducted by an entity that is independent of the Indian tribe or tribal organization receiving grant funds from the Secretary.
( e ) Beginning with fiscal year 1983, any request by an Indian tribe or tribal organization for direct funding by the Secretary must be submitted to the Secretary, together with the required application and related materials, by September 1 preceding the Federal fiscal year for which funds are sought. A separate application is required for each block grant. After the September 1 deadline, tribal applications will be accepted only with the concurrence of the State (or States) in which the tribe or tribal organization is located.
( f ) A State receiving block grant funds is not required to use those funds to provide tangible benefits (e.g., cash or goods) to Indians who are within the service population of an Indian tribe or tribal organization that received direct funding from the Department under the same block grant program for the same fiscal year. A State, however, may not deny Indians access to intangible services funded by block grant programs (e.g., treatment at a community health center) even if the Indians are members of a tribe receiving direct funding for a similar service. A tribe receiving direct block grant funding is not required to use those funds to provide tangible benefits to non-Indians living within the tribe's service area unless the tribe and the State(s) in which the tribe is located agree in writing that the tribe will do so.
[47 FR 29486, July 6, 1982, as amended at 52 FR 37966, Oct. 13, 1987; 64 FR 55857, Oct. 15, 1999]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DANIEL ERICKSEN,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 15-CV-10088

v. HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH

JOHN DOE, #1, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (Doc. 18)

Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim this Bivens action

arising out of plaintiff’s search and seizure at the United States’ border with Canada as a

result of which Customs and Border Protection officers found marijuana and drug

paraphernalia in plaintiff’s vehicle. Defendants’ brief in support of their motion to dismiss

is 20 pages. Plaintiff filed a 93-page response without leave of court to file a brief in excess

of 25 pages as provided for in Local Rule 7.1(d)(3). The court entered an order striking the

improvidently filed brief. Plaintiff has filed a motion for reconsideration, stating that the

complexity of the issues involved require the filing of a 93-page brief. Having considered

plaintiff’s argument, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff may file a brief of no more than 50 pages

to be filed on or before May 15, 2015.

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 1, 2015

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

May 1, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marcia Beauchemin

Deputy Clerk

2:15-cv-10088-GCS-MJH Doc # 19 Filed 05/01/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 234
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Belcrest Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                       
|   



|Date: August 9, 2007
|--------------------



| | /s/ Andrew C. Frenette
Andrew C. Frenette
Chief Financial Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Notice 

AGENCY: FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

DATE & TIME: THURSDAY, DECEMBER 6, 2012 AT 10:00 A.M. 

PLACE: 999 E STREET, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. (NINTH FLOOR) 

STATUS: THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. 

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 

Correction and Approval of the Minutes for the Meeting of November 15, 2012 

Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-34: Freedom PAC and Friends of Mike H 

Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-35: Global Transaction Services Group, Inc. 

Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-36: Green Party of Connecticut 

Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-37: Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. 

Proposed Final Audit Report on Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party 

(A09-08) 

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on McCain-Palin 2008, Inc. and 

McCain-Palin Compliance Fund, Inc. 

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Limited Liability Partnerships 

Management and Administrative Matters 

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language 

interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Shawn Woodhead 

Werth, Secretary and Clerk, at (202)694-1 040, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting 

date. 

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: 

Signed: 

Shawn Woodhead Werth 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission 

Submitted: November 29, 2012 

Judith Ingram, Press Officer 

Telephone: (202) 694-1220
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Veterans' Disability Benefits Commission has scheduled a meeting for May 9-11, 2007, at the Doubletree Hotel Washington, 1515 Rhode Island Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. On May 9-10, the sessions will begin at 8:30 a.m. and end at 5 p.m. each day. On May 11, the session will begin at 8:30 a.m. and end at 3 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Commission is to carry out a study of the benefits under the laws of the United States that are provided to compensate and assist veterans and their survivors for disabilities and deaths attributable to military service.

The agenda for the meeting will feature updates on the progress of the studies being conducted by the Center for Naval Analyses (CNA) and the Institute of Medicine (IOM). There will be additional discussions with CNA on topics of ongoing research and analyses, and the IOM Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Compensation Committee will provide an overview of its final report. The Commission will receive presentations on several draft Issue Papers in various stages of development and discuss the composition of sections of the Commission's final report.

                    Interest persons may attend and present oral statements to the Commission on May 9. Oral presentations will be limited to five minutes or less, depending on the number of participants. Interested parties may also provide written comments for review by the Commission prior to the meeting or at any time, by e-mail to                     *veterans@vetscommission.com*                     or by mail to Mr. Ray Wilburn, Executive Director, Veterans' Disability Benefits Commission, 1101 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20004.                

Dated: April 24, 2007.

By Direction of the Secretary:

E. Philip Riggin,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-2108 Filed 4-30-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
#### Charles C. Moore, *Respondent, v.*William L. Allison, *Appel*lant.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted. Order of reference vacated. Opinion by

Gilbert, J.
#### George Jackson and another, *Respondents, v.*Horace D. Tupper and others, *Appellants.*

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

Jeffrey E. Platt, CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Penhall International Corp.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jeffrey E. Platt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Jeffrey E. Platt













The foregoing certification is furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
# C_2013359EN.01001103.xml

| 7.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/11

---

Order of the General Court of 21 October 2013 — Lyder Enterprises v CPVO — Liner Plants (1993) (SOUTHERN SPLENDOUR)

(Case T-367/11) (1)

1

(Plant varieties - Application for a Community plant variety right for the plant variety SOUTHERN SPLENDOUR - Objections - Rejection of the application by the Board of Appeal of the CPVO - Competence of the CPVO - Taking of evidence - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2013/C 359/20

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Lyder Enterprises Ltd (Auckland, New Zealand) (represented by: G.J. Pickering, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, lawyers)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the CPVO, intervener before the General Court: Liner Plants (1993) Ltd (Waitakere, New Zealand) (represented by: P.S. Jonker, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the CPVO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Board of Appeal of the CPVO of 4 May 2011 (Case A 7/2010), concerning the grant of a Community plant variety right for the plant variety SOUTHERN SPLENDOUR

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Lyder Enterprises Ltd shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Lyder Enterprises Ltd shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.

1

---
Swanson, Brian (OST) 

From: 

S~nt'i 

To: 

Subject: 

Carol Rodseth < rodseth@charter.net> 

Monday, August 13, 2012 10:51 AM 

Swanson, Brian (OST) 

Best choice for Brainerd air service 

3 2: I 0 

Please choose Skywest. I fly out of Brainerd frequently as a resident here. Skywest suits the needs of our community 

better than the other options. 

Thank you. Carol Rodseth, 5880 Parkwood Court, Baxter, MN
Exhibit 10.4

                                                                 January 1, 2005
The Board of Directors
Frontier Staffing, Inc.
22 Latigo Road
Durango, CO 81301

Gentlemen:

     The undersigned, are the owners of Common Shares, $.001 par value per share
(the "Shares"), of Frontier Staffing, Inc., a Nevada Corporation (the
"Company"). On January 30, 2004, the undersigned entered into an Agreement
whereby the undersigned agreed to refrain from selling or otherwise transferring
the Shares, except as provided in said Agreement.

     For value received, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the
undersigned, each for himself, his successors and assigns undertakes,
represents, covenants and agrees with and for the benefit of the Company, to
extend the term of said Agreement through January 31, 2006. All other terms and
conditions of said Agreement remain the same.


<PAGE>



     In Witness whereof, the undersigned have individually executed this
Agreement on the day and date first above given.

/s/ Clarence Downs                               /s/ Matthew Gregarek
-------------------------------                  -------------------------------
Clarence Downs                                   Matthew Gregarek

/s/ David Gregarek                               /s/ R.L. Cowell
-------------------------------                  -------------------------------
David Gregarek                                   R.L. Cowell


                                                Huttner 1999 Partnership, Ltd

                                            By   /s/ General Partner
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 General Partner

     Frontier Staffing, Inc. covenants and agrees to do any act or thing
necessary and proper to enforce said Agreement and this amended Agreement.
Frontier Staffing, Inc.

                                            By   /s/ Authorized Officer
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Authorized Officer
                                        1
<PAGE>


                                    EXHIBIT A



Name                                                 Number of Shares
----                                                 ----------------
Clarence Downs                                          6,400,000
Matthew Gregarek                                          350,000
David Gregarek                                            380,000
R.L. Cowell                                               300,000
Huttner 1999 Partnership, Ltd                             950,000

                                        2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Case No. 2:14-mc-51522

Hon. Bernard A. Friedman

v

MARK APSEY,

Defendant,

and

STATE OF MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,

Garnishee.

/

APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT

The United States of America, Plaintiff, makes application in accordance 

with 28 U.S.C. §3205(b)(1) and 18 U.S.C §3613(a) to the Clerk of the United 

States District Court to issue a Writ of Garnishment upon the judgment entered 

against the Defendant, MARK APSEY, Social Security Number ***-**-2547, 

whose last known address is: 1738 Heron Ridge Dr., Bloomfield Hills, MI, 48302

in Case No. 12CR20545 01 in the amount of $20,100.00, plus post judgment 

interest at the rate of 0%. The sum of $0 has been credited to the judgment debt, 

leaving a total balance due of $20,100.00 (without the post-judgment accrual of 

interest) as of November 5, 2014. Demand for payment of the above-stated debt 

2:14-mc-51522 Doc # 1 Filed 11/06/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1
FX

was made upon the debtor not less than 30 days from November 5, 2014, and 

debtor has failed to satisfy the debt.

The Garnishee is believed to owe or will owe money or property to the 

judgment debtor, or is in possession of property of the debtor, and said property is 

a nonexempt interest of the debtor.

The name and address of the Garnishee or his authorized agent is:

Michigan Department of Treasury

Third Party Withholding Unit

P.O. Box 30785

Lansing, Michigan 48909

Respectfully submitted,

BARBARA L. McQUADE

United States Attorney

s/T.N. Ziedas 

T.N. ZIEDAS

Assistant United States Attorney

U. S. Attorney’s Office

211 W. Fort Street, Ste. 2001

Detroit, MI 48226 (313) 226-9573

peter.ziedas@usdoj.gov

Dated: November 5, 2014 [P34653]

2:14-mc-51522 Doc # 1 Filed 11/06/14 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 2
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 87 (Monday, May 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 25781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2233]



[[Page 25781]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Digital Body Development System

    Notice is hereby given that, on March 19, 2007, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Digital Body Development 
System (``DBDS'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) 
the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and 
objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identifies of the parties 
to the venture are: Altarum, Ann Arbor, MI; American Tooling Center, 
Madison Heights, MI; Atlas Tool, Inc., Roseville, MI; Center for 
Automotive Research, Ann Arbor, MI; CogniTens, Wixom, MI; Ford Motor 
Company, Dearborn, MI; General Motors, Warren, MI; Riviera Tool 
Company, Grand Rapids, MI; UGS PLM Solutions, Southfield, MI. The 
general area of DBDS's planned activity is to develop a decision 
support system that combines optical metrology, a finite element based 
assembly simulation engine, and intelligent agent based problem solving 
technology to enable the implementation of a virtual functional build 
methodology where designers and vehicle launch teams will be able to 
identify problems in assembly builds and make better problem solving 
decisions faster and understand the quality, cost, and timing impacts 
of those decisions.

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-2233 Filed 5-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8501

LEAMON L. TATUM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION; DIVISION OF

CORRECTION; RICHARD LANHAM, Commissioner,

Department of Correction; WILLIAM L. SMITH,

Warden, Maryland House of Correction; M.

MAGWOOD, Sergeant; CHARLES WHIMS, Dietary

Supervisor,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA95-2362-S)

Submitted: March 26, 1996 Decided: April 10, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leamon L. Tatum, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber,

Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Tatum v. Maryland House of Correction, No. CA-95-2362-S (D.

Md. Nov. 30, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED