Opinion issued August 9, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-12-00537-CV

———————————

WILLIAM D. WILSON, SR., Appellant

V.

AMERICAN BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS SUPPLY COMPANY, INC. 

D/B/A ABC SUPPLY CO., INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 967030

MEMORANDUM OPINION

William D. Wilson, Sr. brought this restricted appeal from a post-answer 

default judgment rendered in favor of appellee American Builders & Contractors 
2

Supply Company, Inc. d/b/a ABC Supply Co., Inc. (“ABC Supply”). To prevail 

on a restricted appeal, the appellant must show: (1) he filed notice of the restricted 

appeal within six months after the judgment was signed; (2) he was a party to the 

underlying lawsuit; (3) he did not participate in the hearing that resulted in the 

judgment complained of and did not timely file any postjudgment motions or 

requests for findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (4) error is apparent on the 

face of the record. Ins. Co. of Pa. v. Lejeune, 297 S.W.3d 254, 255 (Tex. 2009) 

(per curiam); Alexander v. Lynda’s Boutique, 134 S.W.3d 845, 848 (Tex. 2004); 

see also TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(c), 30.

The parties have not yet filed briefs in this case, but they have submitted an 

“Agreed Motion to Set Aside the Judgment and Remand for New Trial.” 

According to the agreed statement of the procedural history of this case and this 

Court’s review of the record, all four requirements for relief via a restricted appeal 

have been met: (1) Wilson filed a notice of appeal within six months after the date 

the trial court signed the default judgment; (2) Wilson was a party to the 

underlying lawsuit; (3) Wilson did not participate in the hearing on ABC Supply’s 

motion for default judgment, which was the dispositive trial setting in this case; 

and (4) error is apparent on the face of the record because the trial court rendered a 

default judgment in favor of ABC Supply without notice of the motion for default 

judgment or notice of the hearing on the motion for default judgment being given 
3

to Wilson.1 See Peralta v. Heights Med. Ctr., Inc., 485 U.S. 80, 84, 108 S. Ct. 896, 

899 (1988) (stating that failure to give notice of proceeding that will be accorded 

finality is violation of due process); Mabon Ltd. v. Afri-Carib Enters., Inc., No. 09-

0715, 2012 WL 539385, at *4 (Tex. Feb. 17, 2012) (per curiam) (“Entry of a postanswer default judgment against a defendant who did not receive notice of the trial 

setting or dispositive hearing constitutes a denial of due process under the 

Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.”); see also LBL Oil Co. 

v. Int’l Power Servs., Inc., 777 S.W.2d 390, 390–91 (Tex. 1989) (per curiam) 

(holding same in writ of error context); Yuen v. Fisher, 227 S.W.3d 193, 199 (Tex. 

App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.) (“Because the record establishes that 

Fisher had no actual or constructive notice of the default judgment hearing, we 

conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in setting aside the default 

judgment.”).

 

1 Although ABC Supply’s motion for default judgment contains a certificate of 

service, this certificate states that the motion was mailed to “William E. Wilson” 

at an address in Lorena, Texas. ABC Supply’s first amended petition, the citation 

for this petition, and the “Certificate of Last Known Address for Defendant 

William D. Wilson, Sr.” all list Wilson’s mailing address as an address in China 

Springs, Texas. The record does not contain a notice of hearing relating to ABC 

Supply’s motion for default judgment.
4

We therefore reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand this cause 

for further proceedings. All pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes.