alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

John T. Sawyer, CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Penhall International Corp.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John T. Sawyer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ John T. Sawyer













The foregoing certification is furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
§ 176.806 Electrical. At each initial and subsequent inspection for certification of a vessel, the owner or managing operator shall be prepared to conduct tests and have the vessel ready for inspection of electrical equipment and systems, including the following: ( a ) Inspection of all cable as far as practicable without undue disturbance of the cable or electrical apparatus;
( b ) Test of circuit breakers by manual operation;
( c ) Inspection of fuses including ensuring the ratings of fuses are suitable for the service intended;
( d ) Inspection of rotating electrical machinery essential to the routine operation of the vessel;
( e ) Inspection of all generators, motors, lighting fixtures and circuit interrupting devices located in spaces or areas that may contain flammable vapors;
( f ) Inspection of batteries for condition and security of stowage;
( g ) Operational test of electrical apparatus, which operates as part of or in conjunction with a fire detection or alarms system installed on board the vessel, by simulating, as closely as practicable, the actual operation in case of fire; and
( h ) Operational test of all emergency electrical systems.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Tyrek Neal , Appellant

No. 06

- 23

- 00142

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 76th District Court of Camp County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CF

- 21

- 02862 ). Panel consists of C hief Justice Stevens and Justices van Cleef and Rambin. Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Stevens

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court below. We affirm the judgment of conviction o f the trial co urt. We note that the appellant, Tyrek Neal , has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 12 , 2024 BY ORDER OF THE COURT SCOTT E. STEVENS CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          11,968
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,546
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (21,235)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,699
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,534
<PP&E>                                          47,103
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (30,238)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  97,034
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,193
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           364
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    97,034
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               135,215
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,385
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               175,627
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,662
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,083
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (101,542)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (101,542)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (101,542)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.78)
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 287
Editorial Note: The regulations contained in this part were codified by the Internal Revenue Service in Treasury Decision 6820, 30 FR 6030, Apr. 29, 1965. For text see also 26 CFR part 2.

§ 287.2 Scope of section 511 of the Act and the regulations in this part. ( a ) *Applicability of regulations.* The regulations prescribed in this part— ( 1 ) Apply to gain realized from the sale or loss of vessels, earnings from the operation of vessels, and interest (or otherwise) with respect to amounts previously deposited in the construction reserve fund, for a taxable year beginning after December 31, 1964, and
( 2 ) Apply to the expenditure, obligation, or withdrawal, during a taxable year beginning after December 31, 1964, of any deposits of gain, earnings, and interest (or otherwise) of the character referred to in paragraph (a)(1) of this section without regard to the taxable year in which the deposits were made.
( b ) *Nonrecognition and accumulation.* Section 511 of the Act provides, under conditions specified, for the nonrecognition, for income and excess-profits tax purposes, of the gain realized from the sale or indemnification for loss of certain vessels including certain vessels in the course of construction, or shares therein. It also permits the accumulation of the proceeds of such sales or indemnification and of certain earnings without liability under part I (section 531 and following), subchapter G, chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, and the regulations thereunder (26 CFR 1.531 through 1.537-1 (Income Tax Regulations)).
( c ) *Availability of benefits.* The benefits of section 511 of the Act are available to any citizen as defined in paragraph (a)(4) of § 287.1, who, during any taxable year owns, in whole or in part, a vessel or vessels within the scope of § 287.3. A citizen operating such a vessel or vessels owned by any other person or persons can derive no benefit from the provisions relating to the nonrecognition of gain from the sale or loss of such vessel or vessels so owned, but may establish a construction reserve fund in which he may deposit earnings from the operation of such vessel or vessels.
( d ) *Applicability of section 511.* Section 511 of the Act applies only with respect to sales or losses of vessels within the scope of § 287.3 or in respect of earnings derived from the operation of such vessels. A loss to be within section 511 of the Act must be an actual or constructive total loss. Whether there is a total loss, actual or constructive, will be determined by the Administration.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending December 30, 2006

|Filer                     | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | End of Comment Period                                
|------------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.  | * 3A3         | Franklin Resources, Inc., San Mateo, California, to retain control of 24.4 percent of First Chicago Bancorp, and thereby indirectly retain control of its subsidiary, First Chicago Bank & Trust, both of Chicago, Illinois.                                                                                                                    | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not available
|Newspaper:                | Not available
|Federal Register:         | Not available
|PRINEVILLE BANCORPORATION | CIC           | Notice by Stuart J. Shelk, Jr., Linda S. Shelk, Clark J. Shelk Trust UA, Anne Marie Shelk Trust UA, and John B. Shelk Trust UA, Powell Butte, Oregon, to increase their ownership to 10.58 percent, collectively, in Prineville Bancorporation and thereby indirectly control its subsidiary, Community First Bank, both of Prineville, Oregon. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:01/03/2007   
|Newspaper:                | Not available
|Federal Register:         | 01/03/2007   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                           AERIAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                   SUBSIDIARIES OF AERIAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             STATE OF
                                                          INCORPORATION
                                                                OR
        LEGAL NAME                                         ORGANIZATION
        ----------                                         ------------
<S>                                                       <C>
        APT Operating Company, Inc.                          Delaware
        APT Columbus, Inc.                                   Delaware
        APT Kansas City, Inc.                                Delaware
        APT Tampa/Orlando, Inc.                              Delaware
        APT Minneapolis, Inc.                                Delaware
        APT Houston, Inc.                                    Delaware
        APT Pittsburgh Limited Partnership                   Delaware
        APT Pittsburgh General Partner, Inc.                 Delaware
</TABLE>
Exhibit
        32
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 **PURSUANT
        TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 **(SUBSECTIONS
        (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)**
 
 Pursuant
        to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)
        of
        section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
        undersigned officers of Fusion Telecommunications International, Inc., a
        Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
        knowledge, that:
 
 The
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, (the "Form
        10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
        or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
        in
        the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Dated:
        August 15, 2005      /s/
        Marvin S. Rosen
 Marvin
        S.
        Rosen
 Chairman
        of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 Dated:
        August 15, 2005      /s/
        Barbara Hughes
 Barbara
        Hughes
 Vice
        President of Finance and
        Principal Accounting and Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.21

CONSENT OF EXPERT

Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the Form
40-F) of Cameco Corporation (the Corporation) to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

I hereby consent to reference to my name and my involvement in the preparation of, or supervision of the preparation of, scientific and
technical information in the following instances:



| | (a) | under the headings Operations and Projects  Uranium Operating Properties  McArthur River/Key Lake, Mineral Reserves and Resources  and Governance  Interest of
Experts in the Corporations Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2016 dated March 23, 2017 for the McArthur River/Key Lake properties; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | under the headings Our Operations and Projects  Uranium Operating Properties  McArthur River mine/Key Lake mill and Mineral Reserves and Resources in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation for the year ended December 31, 2016 dated February 9, 2017 for the McArthur River/Key Lake properties,
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(collectively the Technical Information) in the Form 40-F, and to the inclusion and incorporation by
reference of information derived from the Technical Information in the Form 40-F.

I also hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of such Technical Information in the registration statements (Nos. 333-11736, 333-6180 and
333-139165) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Stock Option Plan, registration statement (No. 333-196422) on Form S-8 for the Cameco Corporation Employee Share Ownership Plan and registration statement (No. 333-200678) on Form F-10.

Sincerely,



|                            |  |                                                       
|--------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|/s/        Thomas Saruchera
|Name:                       |  | Thomas Saruchera, P. Eng.                             
|Title:                      |  | Technical Superintendent, Key Lake, Cameco Corporation
|                            | 
|Date:                       |  | March 23, 2017
# C_2013032EN.01001702.xml

| 2.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/17

---

Order of the General Court of 4 December 2012 — Lenz v Commission

(Case T-78/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Public service - Officials - Social security - Reimbursement of the costs of treatment provided by a ‘Heilpraktiker’ - Obligation to state reasons - Distortion of the facts)

2013/C 32/26

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Erika Lenz (Osnabrück, Germany) (represented by: V. Lenz and J. Römer, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 14 December 2010 in Case F-80/09 Lenz v Commission [2010] ECR II-A-1-0000, and seeking that that judgment be set aside

Lenz

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Ms Erika Lenz is to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Erika Lenz is to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 103, 2.4.2011.

1

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 

 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, 

v. 

VERSATA SOFTWARE, INC., 

F/K/A TRILOGY SOFTWARE, 

INC., ET AL., 

 Defendants/Counter-Claimants. 

Case No. 15-10628-MFL-EAS 

(consolidated with Case No. 15-cv-11624) 

Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED 

MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION 

Having considered Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Exceed Page 

Limitation, and finding good cause thereof: 

The Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a Reply in Support 

of the Motion to Stay all Proceedings Pending Inter Partes Review that does not 

exceed eight (8) pages. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 /s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: June 30, 2016 

2:15-cv-10628-MFL-EAS Doc # 118 Filed 06/30/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 4938
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on June 30, 2016, by electronic means and/or ordinary 

mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113 

2:15-cv-10628-MFL-EAS Doc # 118 Filed 06/30/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 4939
Exhibit 23.1

Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors

Siebel Systems, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration
statements on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-47062, 333-68041 and 333-91777) and Forms S-8
(Nos. 333-07983, 333-22763, 333-40437, 333-53369, 333-72969, 333-85007, 333-
94243, 333-41792, 333-49986, 333-51018, 333-52998, 333-55406, 333-59526, 333-
72218 and 333-75052) of Siebel Systems, Inc. of our report dated January 20,
2003, except as to Note 14, which is as of February 13, 2003, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Siebel Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2001 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which report
appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Siebel Systems,
Inc.  Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting for goodwill.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Mountain View, California
   March 13, 2003

---
§ 25.25-17 Survival craft requirements for uninspected passenger vessels of at least 100 gross tons. ( a ) Each uninspected passenger vessel of at least 100 gross tons must have adequate survival craft with enough capacity for all persons aboard and must meet one of the following requirements: ( 1 ) An inflatable liferaft must be approved under 46 CFR part 160, subparts 160.051 or 160.151, and be equipped with an applicable equipment pack or be approved by another standard specified by the Commandant. Inflatable liferafts must be serviced at a servicing facility approved under 46 CFR part 160, subpart 160.151.
( 2 ) An inflatable buoyant apparatus must be approved under 46 CFR part 160, subpart 160.010 or under another standard specified by the Commandant. An inflatable buoyant apparatus must be serviced at a servicing facility approved under 46 CFR part 160, subpart 160.151.
( b ) If the vessel carries a small boat or boats, the capacity of the small boat or boat(s) may be counted toward the survival craft capacity required by this part. Such small boat or boat(s) must meet the requirements for safe loading and floatation in 33 CFR part 183.
[USCG-1999-5040, 67 FR 34776, May 15, 2002]
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of First Federal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc.(the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), theundersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

a)              The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

b)             The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

 
| Date:  | March 6, 2009 | /s/ Sherri R. Billings  |
|--------|--------------------|-------------------------|
|   |               | Sherri R. Billings      |
|   |               | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
# C_2014253EN.01000302.xml

| 4.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 May 2014 — Plásticos Españoles SA (ASPLA) v European Commission

(Case C-35/12 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Plastic industrial bags market - Single and continuous infringement))

2014/C 253/04

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Plásticos Españoles SA (ASPLA) (represented by: E. Garayar Gutiérrez, M. Troncoso Ferrer and E. Abril Fernández, abogados)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Castilla Contreras and F. Castillo de la Torre, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 November 2011 in Case T-76/06 ASPLA v Commission dismissing an application for annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2005) 4634 final of 30 November 2005 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.354 — Industrial bags) concerning a cartel on the market for plastic industrial bags, and, in the alternative, for a reduction of the fine imposed on ASPLA

ASPLA

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Plásticos Españoles SA (ASPLA) to pay the costs of this appeal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Plásticos Españoles SA (ASPLA) to pay the costs of this appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 24.3.2012.

1

---