Your web browser is not supported You're using Internet Explorer, some features might not work. Please switch to another browser like Chrome, Firefox, or Edge for a better experience.


An official website of the United States government Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Federal Election Commission | United States of America Calendar
           Glossary
          Search
              Search


Menu
      Home
      Campaign finance data
        All data
            Raising
            Spending
            Loans and debts
            Filings and reports
            Candidates
            Committees
            Bulk data
            Campaign finance statistics
        Find elections. Search by state or ZIP code
          Look up contributions from specific individuals
      Help for candidates and committees
        All compliance resources
            Guides
            Forms
            Dates and deadlines
            Trainings
        Learn about electronic filing
          Find and contact your committee's analyst
      Legal resources
        All legal resources
            Advisory opinions
            Enforcement
            Statutes
            Legislation
            Regulations
            Court cases
            Policy and other guidance
        Search across all legal resources
          Search guidance documents
      About
        All about the FEC
            News and announcements
            Commission meetings
            Mission and history
            Leadership and structure
            Reports about the FEC
            Careers
            Working with the FEC
            Contact
        Introduction to campaign finance and elections


- Home
- ›
      FEC Record: Litigation
- ›
      Pursuing America’s Greatness v. FEC (District court)

FEC Record: Litigation*Pursuing America’s Greatness v. FEC* (District court)September 29, 2015 On September 24, 2015, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia denied a motion by Pursuing America's Greatness (PAG) for a preliminary injunction to prevent the Commission from enforcing against it restrictions on unauthorized committees’ use of a candidate’s name. **Background**            PAG is a nonconnected independent expenditure-only committee (Super PAC) supporting Governor Mike Huckabee’s 2016 campaign for president. PAG controls a website and a Facebook page that use Gov. Huckabee’s name and indicate PAG's support for his candidacy. PAG maintains, however, that it does not intend to use these pages to solicit contributions to PAG or otherwise engage in fundraising activities. The Federal Election Campaign Act (the Act) states that "any political committee which is not an authorized committee [of a federal candidate]...shall not include the name of any candidate in its name." 52 U.S.C. § 30102(e)(4). Commission regulations further state that any political committee that is not the authorized committee of a candidate shall not include the name of any candidate in its name, which also includes "any name under which a committee conducts activities, such as solicitations or other communications, including a special project name or other designation." 11 CFR 102.14(a). Commission regulations, however, do state that an unauthorized committee **may** include the name of a candidate in the title of a special project name or other communication if the title clearly and unambiguously shows **opposition** to the named candidate. 11 CFR 102.14(b)(3). On July 27, 2015, Pursuing America’s Greatness (PAG) filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia challenging Commission regulations at 11 CFR 102.14 and a recently-issued advisory opinion (AO 2015-04 (Collective Actions PAC)) that restrict an unauthorized committee’s use of a candidate’s name in the committee’s special projects including websites supporting that candidate, and seeking a preliminary injunction to prevent the Commission from enforcing those restrictions against PAG. PAG maintains that the challenged restrictions are an unconstitutional violation of its First Amendment guarantee of freedom of speech. It also challenged AO 2015-04 as invalid under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). **District Court Decision**            The district court found that PAG failed to demonstrate that it is likely to succeed on the merits of its APA and First Amendment claims and declined to grant the motion for a preliminary injunction that would prevent the Commission from enforcing those restrictions against PAG. *APA Challenge.*PAG challenged the naming restrictions under the Administrative Procedure Act as arbitrary and capricious and in excess of the Commission’s statutory authority. PAG argued that the Commission’s naming restrictions were promulgated based on concerns about fraud and confusion in fundraising activities. PAG contended that it will not conduct fundraising activities through its websites and social media pages, and that the Commission’s application of the rules to PAG is arbitrary, capricious and contrary to law. The district court rejected PAG's suggestion that the naming restrictions could only extend to special*fundraising*projects, explaining that the rulemaking record supported the Commission's concern for confusion in all types of communications, and not just fundraising solicitations.*Slip op.* at 15. For example, the court noted that the Facebook page PAG controls itself contained numerous comments that were directly addressed to the candidate supported by PAG, thus illustrating confusion by readers about whether the committee operating the Facebook page was authorized by the candidate. *Slip op.*at 18. In examining the Commission's past deliberations on the naming restriction, the district court found there was "a rational connection between the facts found" by the FEC during the rulemaking processes and "the choice[s] made" by the FEC in promulgating the current version of 11 CFR 102.14 and issuing AO 2015-04. The court also found that there is no indication that the Commission’s interpretation of section 102.14 in AO 2015-04 is contrary to law or to the agency’s intent at the time it revised the regulation. Thus, the court found that PAG did not establish that it is likely to succeed in its case on the merits of its APA claim. *First Amendment Challenge.*PAG also argued that prohibiting it from using a candidate’s name in the name of its websites and other social media platforms when the name of such media do not clearly show opposition to that named candidate amounts to an unconstitutional prior restraint, in violation of the First Amendment. PAG further argued that the exception in 11 CFR 102.14(b)(3), which permits an unauthorized committee to use a federal candidate’s name in a special project name that clearly and unambiguously shows opposition to the named candidate, renders the general naming requirements an unconstitutional content-based restriction on speech, which should not withstand strict scrutiny. The court disagreed, stating that the naming restrictions in question are "part and parcel of FECA’s disclosure regime" and "‘substantially related to the government’s interests in limiting confusion, fraud, and abuse’" by "‘serv[ing] to clarify the candidate-authorization status of political committees.’" *Slip op.* at 23, 29. The court again pointed to the above-referenced public comments posted on the Facebook page PAG controls as an example of the need for such a regulation that avoids confusion as to whether the communication is made by a campaign or not by restricting the use of a candidate's name by an unauthorized committee in its name or the names or titles of its communications or projects. Moreover, as the naming restriction does not actually prevent the committee from supporting or opposing candidates, but merely from using the name of a candidate in the name of the committee or the names of its special projects, the court noted that it only "minimally burdens political committee speech" while satisfying legitimate government interests in ensuring the public knows "who is speaking about a candidate shortly about an election" (*Citizens United*, 558 U.S. at 369) and limiting "the possibility of fraud, confusion and abuse in federal elections." The court thus found that the naming restrictions satisfied constitutional scrutiny. Because the court found that PAG's claims did not establish a likelihood of success for its challenge to the naming restrictions of 11 CFR 102.14 and AO 2015-04, it declined to grant PAG's motion for an injunction to enjoin the Commission from enforcing those restrictions on PAG and its projects and communications. The court also briefly addressed the other factors needed to prevail on a preliminary injunction, noting the reliance by PAG on its First Amendment claims was insufficient to demonstrate that: PAG would suffer irreparable injury if the injunction was not granted;            PAG had established that the balance of equities tips in its favor; and            The public interest would be furthered by the issuance of the injunction. PAG filed a notice of appeal on September 28, 2015, with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. **Resources:** *Pursuing America's Greatness v. FEC* litigation page            *Record*article on AO 2015-04
 Author
          Dorothy YeagerSr. Communications Specialist


Read next: AO 2015-06: Contributions from a candidate to a foreign candidate
 Related: Explore campaign finance data »


This information is not intended to replace the law or to change its meaning, nor does this information create or confer any rights for or on any person or bind the Federal Election Commission or the public. The reader is encouraged also to consult the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (52 U.S.C. 30101 et seq.), Commission regulations (Title 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations), Commission advisory opinions and applicable court decisions.


About
          Careers
          Press
          Contact
   Privacy and security policy
          Plain language
          No FEAR Act
          Strategy, budget and performance
 Open government
          Protected Voices
          USA.gov
          Inspector General
          FOIA
 OpenFEC API
          GitHub repository
          Release notes
          FEC.gov status


Federal Election Commission
 The FEC's Twitter page
            The FEC's YouTube page Sign up for FECMail


Hide glossary Glossary Search terms