alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee will hold a meeting on April 12, 2007 at the U.S. Forest Service Office, 35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA, 96150. This Committee, established by the Secretary of Agriculture on December 15, 1998 (64 FR 2876), is chartered to provide advice to the Secretary on implementing the terms of the Federal Interagency Partnership on the Lake Tahoe Region and other matters raised by the Secretary.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held April 12, 2007, beginning at 1 p.m. and ending at 4 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the U.S. Forest Service Office, 35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA, 96150.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Arla Hains, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit, Forest Service, 35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150, (530) 543-2773.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Items to be covered on the agenda include: (1) A public hearing on the Lake Tahoe Federal Advisory Committees' Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act Round 8 project recommendations; and, (2) the Lake Tahoe Federal Advisory Committee Communications Plan. All Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend at the above address. Issues may be brought to the attention of the Committee during the open public comment period at the meeting or by filing written statements with the secretary for the Committee before or after the meeting. Please refer any written comments to the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit at the contact address stated above.

Dated: March 29, 2007.

Terri Marceron,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 07-1670 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2193 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2193

 To prohibit the Secretary of Defense from implementing any policy to 
prevent or place undue restriction on the sale of intact spent military 
 small arms ammunition casings to domestic manufacturers of small arms 
      ammunition that are approved under trade security controls.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2009

 Mr. Chaffetz introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Secretary of Defense from implementing any policy to 
prevent or place undue restriction on the sale of intact spent military 
 small arms ammunition casings to domestic manufacturers of small arms 
      ammunition that are approved under trade security controls.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Affordable Reloaded Munitions Supply 
(ARMS) Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE RESTRICTION ON SALE OF 
              INTACT SPENT MILITARY SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION CASINGS.

    The Secretary of Defense may not implement any policy that would 
prevent or place undue restriction on the sale of intact spent military 
small arms ammunition casings to domestic manufacturers of small arms 
ammunition that are approved under trade security controls.
                                 <all>
```
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending January 7, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
124 STAT. 2494 PUBLIC LAW 111–234—AUG. 16, 2010 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4275: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 111–444 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Apr. 14, considered and passed House. 

Aug. 5, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–234 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the annex building under construction for the Elbert P. Tuttle United 

States Court of Appeals Building in Atlanta, Georgia, as the ‘‘John C. Godbold 

Federal Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The annex building under construction for the United States 

courthouse located at 56 Forsyth Street in Atlanta, Georgia, known 

as the Elbert P. Tuttle United States Court of Appeals Building, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘John C. Godbold Federal 

Building’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the annex building referred 

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John 

C. Godbold Federal Building’’. 

Approved August 16, 2010. 

Aug. 16, 2010 

[H.R. 4275] 


dkrause on GSDDPC29PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
# C_2013156EN.01001301.xml

| 1.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt — Germany) — Magdeburger Mühlenwerke GmbH v Finanzamt Magdeburg

(Case C-129/12) (1)

1

(Regional aid scheme - Investment in the processing and marketing of agricultural products - Commission decision - Incompatibility with the internal market - Abolition of incompatible aid - Time at which aid is granted - Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations)

2013/C 156/19

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Magdeburger Mühlenwerke GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt Magdeburg

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt — Interpretation of Commission Decision 1999/183/EC of 20 May 1998 concerning State aid for the processing and marketing of German agricultural products which might be granted on the basis of existing regional aid schemes (OJ 1999 L 60, p. 61) — Obligation on Germany to repeal the existing aid schemes which are inconsistent with the framework proposed by the Commission in its communication concerning such aid — Temporal scope of that obligation — Possibility for the Member State concerned to not repeal the aid in question for investments envisaged before the expiration of the period for the implementation of the decision and before the publication of the intention of the Member State to repeal the aid for such investments where the investment in question has been made after the implementation of the decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2 of Commission Decision 1999/183/EC of 20 May 1998 concerning State aid for the processing and marketing of German agricultural products which might be granted on the basis of existing regional aid schemes must be interpreted as precluding the grant of investment aid concerning milling in relation to which the binding investment decision was made before the expiration of the period afforded to the Federal Republic of Germany to comply with that decision or before the publication in the Bundessteuerblatt of the measures taken to that effect, when the delivery of the capital asset and the determination and disbursement of the subsidy took place only after the expiration of that period or that publication, if the time at which an investment subsidy is considered to be granted is only after the expiration of that period. It is for the referring court to determine when an investment subsidy, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, must be considered to be granted, by taking account of all the conditions laid down by national law for obtaining the aid in question and ensuring that the prohibition laid down in Article 2(1) of Decision 1999/183 is not circumvented.

---

(1)  OJ C 174, 16.6.2012.

1

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 24, 2009 

d0217 

Order 

 

February 24, 2009 

137247(16) 

DAVID SHOPE, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137247 

 COA: 284276 

WCAC: 07-000039 

A.D. TRANSPORT EXPRESS, INC., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November 

25, 2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order 

was entered erroneously.
EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-39777 and 333-39779)  pertaining to the 1996 Equity Incentive
Plan and the 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and in the Registration Statement
(Form S-4 No.  333-53421) and related  Prospectus,  of our report dated July 17,
1998 with  respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and  schedule of
Arterial Vascular Engineering, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A)
for the year ended June 30, 1998.


                                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Palo Alto, California
October 8, 1998
EXHIBIT  32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Stephen M. Siedow, the Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chief Financial Officer of EQUICAP, INC. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY, that:

     1.   The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December
          31, 2003 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement
this 17th day of February, 2004.


                                            By:  /s/  Stephen M. Siedow
                                               --------------------------------
                                                      Stephen M. Siedow
                                                      Chief Executive Officer,
                                                      President and
                                                      Chief Financial Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to EQUICAP, INC. and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or it staff upon request.
|                                                                          |   | Years      Ended October 31, |      |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|-----------|
|                                                                          |   | 2009                         |      |   | 2008 |   |
| Net      income (loss)                                                        |   | $                            | 3,291,066 |   |   | $ | (2,597,294 | ) |
|                                                                          |   |                         |      |   |   |   |   |   |
| BASIC      EARNINGS (LOSS):                                                   |   |                         |      |   |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted      average number of common shares outstanding                     |   |                         | 5,441,462 |   |   |   | 5,476,173 |   |
|                                                                          |   |                         |      |   |   |   |   |   |
| Basic      earnings (loss) per common share                                   |   | $                            | .60       |   |   | $ | (.47 | ) |
|                                                                          |   |                         |      |   |   |   |   |   |
| DILUTED      EARNINGS (LOSS):                                                 |   |                         |      |   |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted      average number of common shares outstanding                     |   |                         | 5,441,462 |   |   |   | 5,476,173 |   |
| Warrants      – common stock equivalents                                |   |                         | -         |   |   |   | - |   |
|                                                                          |   |                         |      |   |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted      average number of common shares outstanding – as adjusted |   |                         | 5,441,462 |   |   |   | 5,476,173 |   |
|                                                                          |   |                         |      |   |   |   |   |   |
| Diluted      earnings (loss) per common share                                 |   | $                            | .60       |   |   | $ | (.47 | ) |
EXHIBIT 32.1




STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE




SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




The undersigned, Andrew Gordon, is the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Coffee Holding Co., Inc. (the “Company”).




This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended October 31, 2010 (the “Report”).




By execution of this statement, I certify that:




A)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); andB)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.




This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Coffee Holding Co., Inc. and will be retained by Coffee Holding Co., Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






Date:  February 28, 2011
By:
/s/ Andrew GordonAndrew GordonPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive and Accounting Officer)
# C_2012319EN.01000802.xml

| 20.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/8

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2012 — Sogepi Consulting y Publicidad v OHIM (ESPETEC)

(Case T-72/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark ESPETEC - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive nature - Lack of distinctiveness - Lack of distinctiveness acquired by use - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 319/13

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sogepi Consulting y Publicidad, SL (Vic, Spain) (represented by: initially by: J. de Oliveira Vaz Miranda Sousa, T. Barceló Rebaque and N. Esteve Manasanch, and subsequently by: J. de Oliveira Vaz Miranda Sousa and N. Esteve Manasanch)

Applicant:

Defendant: OHIM (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 November 2010 (Case R 312/2010-2) concerning an application for registration of the word mark ESPETEC as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Sogepi Consulting y Publicidad, SL to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Sogepi Consulting y Publicidad, SL to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 9.4.2011.

1

---
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit __________________________ 

AUTOMOTIVE BODY PARTS ASSOCIATION, 

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, 

Defendant - Appellee

__________________________ 

2018-1613 

__________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Michigan in No. 2:15-cv-10137-LJMRSW, Judge Laurie J. Michelson. 

__________________________ 

JUDGMENT 

__________________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been considered, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 

AFFIRMED

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 11, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

Peter R. Marksteiner 

Clerk of Court 

Case 2:15-cv-10137-LJM-RSW ECF No. 84 filed 07/11/19 PageID.3318 Page 1 of 1 Case: 18-1613 Document: 53 Page: 1 Filed: 07/11/2019
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending September 9, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending July 1, 2006

|Filer              | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                         | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------ | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|EAST WEST BANK     | * Branch       | East West Bank, Pasadena, California, to establish a branch facility at 135 N. Los Robles Avenue, Pasadena, California. | Newspaper:06/27/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:         | 06/27/2006    
|Federal Register:  | Not applicable
|PACIFIC STATE BANK | * Branch       | Pacific State Bank, Stockton, California, to establish a branch facility at 501 W. Kettleman Lane, Lodi, California.    | Newspaper:07/10/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:         | 07/10/2006    
|Federal Register:  | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us