alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending February 25, 2006

|Filer                                 | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                                  
|------------------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN FLEETWOOD, THE | Member         | The First National Bank in Fleetwood (to be named Fleetwood Bank), Fleetwood, PA, to become a member of the Federal Reserve System.                                                       | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                            | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                     | Not applicable
|ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.     | * 3A3          | Orrstown Financial Services, Inc., Shippensburg, PA, to acquire The First National Bank of Newport, Newport, PA                                                                           | Newspaper:03/06/2006Federal Register:03/09/2006        
|Newspaper:                            | 03/06/2006    
|Federal Register:                     | 03/09/2006    
|TOWER BANCORP INC.                    | 4c8* 3A5       | Tower Bancorp, Inc., Greencastle, PA, to acquire FNB Financial Corporation, McConnellsburg, and its wholly own subsidiary, The First National Bank of McConnellsburg, McConnellsburg, PA. | Newspaper:03/12/2006Federal Register:03/13/2006        
|Newspaper:                            | 03/12/2006    
|Federal Register:                     | 03/13/2006    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>             5
<MULTIPLIER>          1,000
<CURRENCY>            US DOLLARS

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                             1
<CASH>                                  3,063
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                              21
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                               292
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        3,553
<PP&E>                                  3,105
<DEPRECIATION>                          1,153
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          7,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   1,269
<BONDS>                                     0
 <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                 3
<COMMON>                                   57
<OTHER-SE>                              5,931
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            7,260
<SALES>                                     5
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            5
<CGS>                                       5
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           2,047
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (1,979)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (1,979)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                          (1,979)
<EPS-BASIC>                            (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (0.37)




</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
International Imaging Systems, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, I, C.
Leo Smith, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     (1)  such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30,
          2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and;
     (2)  the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the quarter ended June 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of
          International Imaging Systems, Inc.

INTERNATIONAL IMAGING SYSTEMS, INC.

By: /s/ C. LEO SMITH
    -----------------------------------------
    C. Leo Smith, Chief Executive Officer and
    Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 15, 2006

                                     - 17 -
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-03267, 333-19095, 333-33043, 333-33045 on Form S-8 and 333-33057, 333-33061
on Form S-3 of DecisionOne Holdings Corp., of our reports dated September 4,
1998 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of DecisionOne Holdings Corp.
and DecisionOne Corporation for the year ended June 30, 1998.


Deloitte & Touche LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
September 24, 1998
EXHIBIT 99

                                  CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
       (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
                              United States Code)

         Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of GWL&A Financial Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003
(the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:       May 14, 2003  /s/ William T. McCallum
                           ____________________________________________________
                           William T. McCallum
                           President and Chief Executive Officer



Dated:       May 14, 2003  /s/ Mitchell T.G. Graye
                           ____________________________________________________
                           Mitchell T.G. Graye
                           Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed
as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order filed July 24, 2012

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 11

- 00679

- CR

CHRISTOPHER LEE STAN LEY , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Crim Ct at Law No 12 Harris County, Texas Trial Co urt Cause No. 1625671



### ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to T ex as R ule of App ellate P rocedure 34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State's Exhibit #7

.
The clerk of the Co Crim Ct at Law No 12 is directed to deliver to the C lerk of this court the original of State's Exhibit #7, on or before July 31, 2012

. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon co mpletion of inspection, to return the original of State's Exhibit #7, to the clerk
of the Co Crim Ct at Law No 12.

PER CURIAM
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-11-0000358 23-MAY-2011 09:54 AM SCAD-11-0000358

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs. VICKERY J. RUSSELL, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC 09-108-8831, 09-109-8832, 09-110-8833, 09-111-8834)

ORDER OF DISBARMENT (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.) Upon consideration of the Disciplinary Board’s report and recommendation to disbar Respondent Vickery J. Russell, Russell’s lack of objection thereto, and the record, it appears that in the representation of three clients and the investigation of the complaints, Russell violated Hawai ' i Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.3, Rule 1.4(a), Rule 1.15(a)(1), Rule 1.15(c), Rule 1.15(d), Rule 1.15(f)(3), Rule 1.16(d), Rule 3.4(e), Rule 8.4(a), Rule 8.4(c), and Rule 8.4(d), as well as Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai ' i (RSCH) Rule 17(d)(1). It further appears that the Respondent Vickery J. Russell cannot be found within the State and that she no longer maintains a practice in Hawai ' i and, therefore, the disbarment effective thirty (30) days after the entry of this order, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.16(c), would serve no purpose. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Russell is disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Hawai ' ieffective, notwithstanding Rule 2.16(c) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai ' i, immediately upon entry of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as a condition of reinstatement, in addition to the requirements of RSCH Rule 2.16, Russell shall pay restitution as follows: To Alan Cabos, the amount of $2,000.00; To Charlene P. Kuhia, the amount of $7,500.00; and To James Wayne Shamblin, the amount of $4,500.00. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in addition to any other requirements for reinstatement imposed by the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai ' i, Respondent Russell shall pay all costs of these proceedings as approved upon timely submission of a bill of costs and an opportunity to respond thereto, as prescribed by RSCH Rule 2. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, May 23, 2011. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

2
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of William E. Haxtun, *Executor, etc*.

Decree of surrogate reversed and executor ordered *to*appear and be examined. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2305 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate the diversity 

immigrant program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2009 

Mr. GOODLATTE (for himself, Ms. HERSETH SANDLIN, Mr. SMITH of Texas, 

Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. POE of Texas, Mr. HARPER, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. CONAWAY, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mrs. MILLER of Michigan, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. BILBRAY, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. 

BOOZMAN, Mr. FORTENBERRY, Mr. HELLER, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. 

SHERMAN, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. BARTLETT, Mr. SULLIVAN, and 

Mr. CANTOR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate 

the diversity immigrant program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as— 

5 (1) the ‘‘Security and Fairness Enhancement 

6 for America Act of 2009’’; or 

7 (2) the ‘‘SAFE for America Act’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2305 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF DIVERSITY IMMIGRANT PRO2 GRAM. 

3 (a) WORLDWIDE LEVEL OF DIVERSITY IMMI4 GRANTS.—Section 201 of the Immigration and Nation5 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a)— 

7 (A) by inserting ‘‘and’’ at the end of para8 graph (1); 

9 (B) by striking ‘‘; and’’ at the end of para10 graph (2) and inserting a period; and 

11 (C) by striking paragraph (3); and 

12 (2) by striking subsection (e). 

13 (b) ALLOCATION OF DIVERSITY IMMIGRANT VISAS.— 

14 Section 203 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1153) is amended— 

15 (1) by striking subsection (c); 

16 (2) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘(a), (b), or 

17 (c),’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) or (b),’’; 

18 (3) in subsection (e), by striking paragraph (2) 

19 and redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (2); 

20 (4) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘(a), (b), or 

21 (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) or (b)’’; and 

22 (5) in subsection (g), by striking ‘‘(a), (b), and 

23 (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) and (b)’’. 

24 (c) PROCEDURE FOR GRANTING IMMIGRANT STA25 TUS.—Section 204 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) is amend26 ed— 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2305 IH

1 (1) by striking subsection (a)(1)(I); and 

2 (2) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘(a), (b), or 

3 (c)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) or (b)’’. 

4 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 this section shall take effect on October 1, 2009. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Exhibit
23 Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 
 The Board
of Directors and Shareholders
 Matria
Healthcare, Inc.:
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-100977, 333-90822, 333-72516, 333-72512, 333-69347, 333-42856, 333-02283,
333-0117875, 333-01539, 333-126776, 333-126778 and 333-126779) on Form S-8 and
(No. 333-109488 and 333-116200) on Form S-3 of Matria Healthcare, Inc. of our
reports dated February 29, 2008, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Matria Healthcare, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and
comprehensive earnings (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the related financial statement
schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the 2007 Annual Report on Form
10-K of Matria Healthcare, Inc.  Our report with respect to the
financial statements refers to the adoption by the Company of the provisions of
Financial Accounting Standards Board No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes, as of January 1, 2007, Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior
Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements, as of January 1, 2006, and Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, as of
January 1, 2006.
 
 
 
 
 KPMG
LLP
 
 Atlanta,
Georgia
 February
29, 2008
#### THOMAS HASSALL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH *G.*DENELSBECK, DEFENDANT-PROSECUTOR.

Submitted October 12, 1928

Decided March 28, 1929.

Before Gummere, Chiee Justice, and Justice Parker.

Eor the plaintiff, *William A. Moore.*

For the defendant, *Harvey T. Satterthwaite.*

Per Curiam.

This is an action of deceit, the plaintiff claiming that the defendant fraudently induced him to buy and pay for certain stock in a small corporation by false representations touching the solvency and assets' of the company, and that thereafter the company became insolvent and was sold out by the receiver with no money remaining for division among the stockholders. The only reason argued is that the verdict was against the weight of evidence. We have examined the evidence with care and conclude that this ground is without substance. The question for the jury to determine was merely one of veracity as between the plaintiff and the defendant, and the jury resolved this question by determining it in favor of the plaintiff, and, as we think, with good reason.

The rule to show cause will therefore be discharged.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, Robert S. Herlin, President and Chief Executive Officer of Evolution Petroleum Corporation (the “Company”), certifies in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 13th day of September, 2011.

 
|   | /s/   ROBERT S. HERLIN                  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   | Robert   S. Herlin                      |
|   | President   and Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Evolution Petroleum Corporation and will be retained by Evolution Petroleum Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certificate is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to this Form 10-K and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-K.

 

----
§ 189.15-5 Alternate compliance. ( a ) In place of compliance with other applicable provisions of this subchapter, the owner or operator of a vessel subject to plan review and inspection under this subchapter for initial issuance or renewal of a Certificate of Inspection may comply with the Alternate Compliance Program provisions of 46 CFR part 8.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, a list of authorized classification societies, including information for ordering copies of approved classification society rules and supplements, is available from Commandant (CG-ENG), Attn: Office of Design and Engineering Systems, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509; telephone 202-372-1371 or fax 202-372-1925. Approved classification society rules and supplements are incorporated by reference into 46 CFR 8.110(b).
[74 FR 20419, May 4, 2009, as amended by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49240, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59789, Oct. 1, 2012; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60164, Sept. 30, 2013]
#### THE WEST SHORE RAILROAD COMPANY, PROSECUTOR, v. BOROUGH OF BEGOTA, HARLAN P. ROSS, BOROUGH CLERK OF THE BOROUGH OF BEGOTA, AND MICHAEL A. REIS, CHARLES D. WALKER AND ARTHUR B. SMITH, GENERAL BOARD OF ASSESSMENT COMMISSIONERS OF THE BOROUGH OF BEGOTA, DEFENDANTS.

Submitted May 18, 1929

Decided November 7, 1929.

Before Justices Teenci-iaed, Lloyd and Case.

For the prosecutor, *Wall, Haight, Carey & Hartpence.*

. For the defendants, *De Turóle & West.*

Pee Curiam.

This rule requires the borough to show cause why a writ of *certiorari*should not be allowed to review a certain assessment made against the prosecutor railroad company by the general board of assessment commissioners of the borough •and the resolution confirming the same passed by the borough council.

The assessment was confirmed on May 17th, 1928. The prosecutor did not apply for the writ until August 18th, 1928, more than three months after the date of confirmation of the commissioners’ report, and so the defendants contend that *973the writ should be denied because section 56 of chapter 195 of laws of 1921 provides: “That no *certiorari** * * shall be allowed or granted * * * to set aside any assessment or award made for any improvement after thirty days shall have elapsed from the date of the confirmation of such assessment or award.”

We think this would be so if the grounds urged for setting aside the assessment were merely some irregularity in the proceedings, or that the amount of the assessment was excessive, or that there was a mistake in the manner of making it. But this limitation does not apply and laches cannot be successfully urged where, as here, it is contended (among other things)—(1) that the property is not subject to assessment for local improvement; (2) that the assessment deprives the prosecutor of its property without just compensation, and (3) that it denies prosecutor due process of law and the equal protection of the laws, and where, as here, these questions are fairly debatable. *Delaware River, &c., Co.*v. *Township of Haddon,*5 *N. J. Mis. R.*210.

Without passing upon other questions suggested both for and against the allowance of the writ, we conclude that for present purposes the rule to show cause must be made absolute and the writ awarded.
# C_2012080EN.01002605.xml

| 17.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/26

---

Order of the General Court of 26 January 2012 — Symfiliosi v FRA

(Case T-397/11) (1)

1

2012/C 80/48

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.

1

---