alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       6
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER> 1
   <NAME> BELCREST CAPITAL FUND LLC


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                    5,143,196,291
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                   5,623,154,533
<RECEIVABLES>                            39,156,391
<ASSETS-OTHER>                           44,236,512
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           5,706,547,436
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                 0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                  1,589,192,705
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                96,668,141
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                      1,685,860,846
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                          4,020,686,590
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                 0
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                    32,246,846
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                    33,007,386
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                   0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                  0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                 0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                 514,991,363
<NET-ASSETS>                             4,020,686,590
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                        61,148,812
<INTEREST-INCOME>                        4,364,543
<OTHER-INCOME>                           26,976,310
<EXPENSES-NET>                           88,421,490
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                  4,068,175
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                 40,825,992
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                152,432,872
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                    197,327,037
<EQUALIZATION>                           0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                    3,971,841
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                  0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>              760,540
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                      0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                   100,074,059
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                  0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                    6,656,742
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       49,252,685
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                          88,421,490
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                     3,966,912,762
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                    118.78
<PER-SHARE-NII>                          0.12
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                  5.90
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                     0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               (0.12)
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                     0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                      124.68
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                          4.49


</TABLE>
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-34945) and in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Nos. 333-19769,  333-19885,  333-19953 and 333-24315) of The JPM Company of
our report  dated  January 24, 2001  relating to the  financial  statements  and
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Philadelphia, PA
January 24, 2001
# C_2011370EN.01001702.xml

| 17.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/17

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Lecce (Italy) lodged on 13 October 2011 — Criminal proceedings against Abdoul Khadre Mbaye

(Case C-522/11)

2011/C 370/29

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Giudice di Pace di Lecce

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Abdoul Khadre Mbaye

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does Article 2(2)(b) of Directive 2008/115/EC (1) preclude the possible application of that directive even when the national legislation (Article 10a of Legislative Decree 286/98) penalises an illegal entry or stay by expulsion as an alternative to criminal law sanctions? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does Article 2(2)(b) of Directive 2008/115/EC (1) preclude the possible application of that directive even when the national legislation (Article 10a of Legislative Decree 286/98) penalises an illegal entry or stay by expulsion as an alternative to criminal law sanctions?

1

| 2. | Does the Community directive on the return of third-country nationals preclude criminal sanctions where a foreign national is merely unlawfully present on national territory, regardless of whether the administrative return procedure provided for by the national legislation and by the directive itself has been completed? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does the Community directive on the return of third-country nationals preclude criminal sanctions where a foreign national is merely unlawfully present on national territory, regardless of whether the administrative return procedure provided for by the national legislation and by the directive itself has been completed?

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98.

1

---
# C_2014292EN.01002901.xml

| 1.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2014 — Telefónica de España and Telefónica Móviles España v Commission

(Case T-151/11) (1)

1

((State aid - Public service broadcasting - Aid planned by Spain for RTVE - Alteration of the funding scheme - Replacement of advertising revenues by new taxes on television and telecommunication operators - Decision declaring the new funding scheme compatible with the internal market - Procedural rights - New aid - Alteration of the existing aid scheme - Fiscal measure constituting the method by which the aid measure is financed - Tax necessarily hypothecated to the aid - Direct impact of the revenue of the tax on the amount of the aid - Proportionality - Duty to state reasons))

2014/C 292/34

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Telefónica de España, SA (Madrid, Spain); and Telefónica Móviles España, SA (Madrid) (represented by: F. González Díaz and F. Salerno, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Valero Jordana and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented initially by M. Muñoz Pérez, subsequently by S. Centeno Huerta and N. Díaz Abad, subsequently by N. Díaz Abad, and lastly by M. Sampol Pucurull, abogados del Estado); and Corporación de Radio y Televisión Española, SA (RTVE) (Madrid) (represented by A. Martínez Sánchez, A. Vázquez-Guillén Fernandez de la Riva and J. Rodríguez Ordóñez, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission Decision 2011/1/EU of 20 July 2010 on the State aid scheme C 38/09 (ex NN 58/09) which Spain is planning to implement for Corporación de Radio y Televisión Española (RTVE) (OJ 2011 L 1, p. 9).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Telefónica de España, SA and Telefónica Móviles España, SA shall bear their own costs and pay jointly the costs incurred by the European Commission and Corporación de Radio y Televisión Española, SA (RTVE). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Telefónica de España, SA and Telefónica Móviles España, SA shall bear their own costs and pay jointly the costs incurred by the European Commission and Corporación de Radio y Televisión Española, SA (RTVE).

| 3. | The Kingdom of Spain shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Kingdom of Spain shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 145, 14.5.2011.

1

---
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2328 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a credit against 

income tax for the installation of residential micro-combined heat and 

power property. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2009 

Mr. HIGGINS (for himself, Mr. REICHERT, Mr. ARCURI, and Mr. MCHUGH) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 

credit against income tax for the installation of residential micro-combined heat and power property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESIDENTIAL ENERGY EFFICIENT PROPERTY 

4 CREDIT TO INCLUDE MICRO-COMBINED HEAT 

5 AND POWER GENERATING EQUIPMENT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.— 

7 (1) ALLOWANCE OF CREDIT.—Subsection (a) of 

8 section 25D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

9 (relating to allowance of credit) is amended by strikVerDate Nov 24 2008 06:53 May 09, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2328.IH H2328

jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2328 IH

1 ing ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph (4), by striking 

2 the period at the end of paragraph (5) and inserting 

3 ‘‘, and’’, and by adding at the end the following new 

4 paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(6) 30 percent of the qualified micro-combined 

6 heat and power property expenditures made by the 

7 taxpayer during such year.’’. 

8 (2) QUALIFIED MICRO-COMBINED HEAT AND

9 POWER PROPERTY EXPENDITURES DEFINED.—Sub10 section (d) of section 25D of such Code (relating to 

11 definitions) is amended by adding at the end the fol12 lowing new paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(6) QUALIFIED MICRO-COMBINED HEAT AND

14 POWER PROPERTY EXPENDITURE.—The term ‘quali15 fied micro-combined heat and power property ex16 penditure’ means any expenditure for an integrated, 

17 cogenerating building heating and electrical power 

18 generation system which— 

19 ‘‘(A) has a full load design total fuel use 

20 efficiency in the production of heat and elec21 tricity of not less than 80 percent, 

22 ‘‘(B) operates with a rated capacity of at 

23 least 1 kilowatt, but not more than 30 kilo24 watts, of electricity, 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2328 IH

1 ‘‘(C) is manufactured, installed, and oper2 ated in accordance with applicable government 

3 and industry standards, 

4 ‘‘(D) is capable of being connected to the 

5 local electric power distribution system, and 

6 ‘‘(E) generates electricity for use in con7 nection with a dwelling unit located in the 

8 United States used as a residence by the tax9 payer.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

12 December 31, 2008. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
EXIHIBIT  32.1








STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




The undersigned, Andrew Gordon, is the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Coffee Holding Co., Inc. (the “Company”).




This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2010 (the “Report”).




By execution of this statement, I certify that:




A)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and




B)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.




This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Coffee Holding Co., Inc. and will be retained by Coffee Holding Co., Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:  January 31, 2011

/s/ Andrew GordonAndrew GordonPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive and Accounting Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, § 

§ 

 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant § CASE NO. 15-10628-MFL-EAS 

 § 

v. § (Consolidated with 

 § Case No. 15-11624-MFL-EAS) 

VERSATA SOFTWARE, INC., f/k/a § Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

TRILOGY SOFTWARE, INC., § 

TRILOGY DEVELOPMENT § 

GROUP, INC., AND TRILOGY, INC., § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

 § 

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. 

__________________________________________________________________ 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

TRANSCRIPT REDACTION REQUEST 

Before the Court is Defendant’s Transcript Redaction Request to redact 

portions of the transcript of the July 24, 2018 Motion Hearing (Dkt. #519). Versata 

has submitted a Redaction Request dated August 27, 2018, identifying eight portions 

of the transcript to be redacted. These portions related to discussion of Versata’s 

financial information and trade secrets. Having considered the matter, the Court 

GRANTS the request. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant’s Transcript Redaction 

Request is GRANTED and the Court Reporter is directed to redact the portions of 

the transcript identified in Versata’s Redaction Request form. 
2 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the transcript of motions hearings held 

on July 24, 2018, at Docket #519 be sealed. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: September 18, 2018 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on September 18, 2018, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (810) 341-9764
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.013-1 Scope. ( a ) This subpart contains performance requirements, acceptance tests, and production testing and inspection requirements for polyethylene foam used in the construction of personal flotation devices (PFDs) approved under part 160 of this subchapter. Manufacturers shall also comply with the requirements of subpart 164.019 of this chapter.
( b ) All polyethylene foams accepted under this subpart are non-standard components. Acceptance of polyethylene foam prior to being incorporated into finished PFDs, or during the course of manufacture, shall in no case be construed as a guarantee of the acceptance of the finished PFD.
# C_2015198EN.01002701.xml

| 15.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 April 2015 — Staelen v Ombudsman

(Case T-217/11) (1)

1

((Non-contractual liability - Treatment by the Ombudsman of a complaint concerning the improper management of the list of suitable candidates for a general competition - Investigatory powers - Due diligence - Loss of opportunity - Non-pecuniary damage))

(2015/C 198/35)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Claire Staelen (Bridel, Luxembourg) (represented initially by L. Levi, M. Vandenbussche and A. Blot, subsequently by F. Wies and A. Hertzog and lastly by V. Olona, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Ombudsman (represented by: G. Grill, acting as Agent, assisted by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for damages seeking to obtain compensation for harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the approach taken by the European Ombudsman in the treatment of her complaint concerning the improper management of the list of suitable candidates for General Competition EUR/A/151/98, on which she appeared as a successful candidate.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders the European Ombudsman to pay compensation of EUR 7  000 to Ms Claire Staelen; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders the European Ombudsman to pay compensation of EUR 7  000 to Ms Claire Staelen;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the Ombudsman to bear half of his own costs and to pay half of those of Ms Staelen; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Ombudsman to bear half of his own costs and to pay half of those of Ms Staelen;

| 4. | Orders Ms Staelen to bear half of her own costs and to pay half of those of the Ombudsman. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Ms Staelen to bear half of her own costs and to pay half of those of the Ombudsman.

---

(1)  OJ C 204, 9.7.2011.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.028-5 Marking. ( a ) *General.* Each signal pistol shall be permanently and legibly marked with its serial number, Coast Guard approval number, and the name and address of the manufacturer.
( b ) [Reserved]
# C_2013377EN.01002001.xml

| 21.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 377/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 377/20

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 23 October 2013 — Gomes Moreira v ECDC

(Case F-80/11) (1)

1

(Civil Service - Temporary staff - Anticipated termination of a fixed-term contract - Breach of trust - Disciplinary misconduct)

2013/C 377/44

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Joaquim Paulo Gomes Moreira (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (represented by: A. Ammon, Agent, initially, and subsequently R. Trott, Agent, D. Waelbroek and A. Duron, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision to terminate the applicant’s contract for disciplinary reasons and for payment of a sum by way of compensation for the material and non-material harm allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 11 October 2010 in so far as it suspended the applicant from his duties; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 11 October 2010 in so far as it suspended the applicant from his duties;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 319, 29.10.2011, p. 30.

1

---
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Case No.: 5:15-CV-10261 

 Plaintiff, Hon. John Corbett O’Meara 

 

-v- 

 

MELISSA LEBOWITZ, 

 Defendant, 

 . 

____________________________________________/ 

 

 ORDER DISMISSING CASE 

 

Pursuant to the stipulation filed by the parties on February 3, 2015, and the Court being 

otherwise fully advised in the premises: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the matter is dismissed with prejudice and without 

costs to either party. 

Date: February 3, 2015 s/John Corbett O’Meara 

 United States District Judge 

Case 5:15-cv-10261-JCO-MKM ECF No. 4, PageID.10 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thinkpath, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Declan A. French,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.



     May 20, 2005                   By: /s/ Declan A. French
                                        ---------------------
                                             Name: Declan A. French
                                             Title: Chief Executive Officer
#### § 172.155 Specific applicability.

This subpart applies to each tankship that has on board a bulk liquefied gas listed in Table 4 of part 154 of this chapter as cargo, cargo residue, or vapor.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

DONYELL HACKETT, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No. 2:15-cv-10682-RHC-RSW 

GOCH & SONS TOWING, INC, 

 Defendant. 

______________________________________/ 

ADAM G. TAUB (P-48703) 

Adam G. Taub & Associates Consumer Law Group, PLC 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

17200 West 10 Mile Road, Suite 200 

Southfield, MI 48075 

248-746-3790 

adamgtaub@clgplc.net

JAMES R. AUSTIN (P-43400) 

Law Offices of James R. Austin, P.C. 

Attorneys for Defendant 

6880 Thayer Lake Dr. 

Alden, MI 49612 

248-909-4752 

jaustin@jaustinlaw.com 

______________________________________/ 

STIPULATED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT 

WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS 

At a session of said Court, held in the City 

of Detroit, County of Wayne, State of Michigan, 

on August 17, 2015. 

PRESENT: Hon. Robert H. Cleland 

 US District Court Judge 

 This matter having been brought to be heard upon the stipulation of the parties, through 

counsel, the Court otherwise being fully advised as to the premises, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint in the above-captioned cause of 

Case 2:15-cv-10682-RHC-RSW ECF No. 9 filed 08/17/15 PageID.25 Page 1 of 2
action is dismissed as to all parties with prejudice and without costs to any party. 

 This Order disposes of the last pending claim and closes the case. 

 s/Robert H. Cleland 

 US District Court Judge 

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: 

/s/ Adam G. Taub . 

Adam G. Taub (P-48703) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

/s/ James R. Austin . 

James R. Austin (P-43400) 

Attorney for Defendant 

Drafted by: 

James R. Austin (P-43400) 

Law Offices of James R. Austin, PC 

6880 Thayer Lake Dr. 

Alden, MI 49612 

248-909-4752 

Case 2:15-cv-10682-RHC-RSW ECF No. 9 filed 08/17/15 PageID.26 Page 2 of 2