UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

KENNETH SMITH,

Petitioner,

v.

BONITA HOFFNER,

Respondent.

/

Case Number: 4:15-cv-11746

Hon. Linda V. Parker

OPINION AND ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

Petitioner Kenneth Smith (“Petitioner” or “Smith”), a Michigan state

prisoner, has filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons set forth below, the Court determines that this is a

successive habeas corpus petition and, therefore, orders it transferred to the United

States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 16311

 and 28

U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). 

1 28 U.S.C. § 1631 provides, in relevant part:

Whenever a civil action is filed in a court . . . and that

court finds that there is a want of jurisdiction, the court

shall, if it is in the interest of justice, transfer such action

or appeal to any other such court in which the action or

appeal could have been brought at the time it was filed or

noticed . . .

4:15-cv-11746-LVP-EAS Doc # 3 Filed 07/12/16 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 51
Smith challenges his 1990 convictions for first-degree murder, Mich. Comp.

Laws § 750.316, two counts of assault with intent to do great bodily harm less than

murder, Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.84, one count of armed robbery, Mich. Comp.

Laws § 750.529, and three counts of possession of a firearm during the

commission of a felony, Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.227b. In 1996, Smith filed a

habeas corpus petition in the United States District Court for the Western District

of Michigan challenging the same convictions challenged in this petition. The

petition was denied on the merits. See 11/26/97 Opinion and Order, Smith v.

Withrow, No. 4:96-cv-00184, dkt. # 36 (Enslen, J.). The Court certified for appeal

Smith’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim. See id. The Sixth Circuit Court of

Appeals, after certifying four additional claims for appellate review, affirmed the

district court’s denial of Smith’s habeas corpus petition. Smith v. Withrow, No. 97-

2319, 1999 WL 503473 (6th Cir. July 6, 1999).

Before a prisoner may file a habeas petition challenging a conviction already

challenged in a prior habeas petition, the prisoner must “move in the appropriate

court of appeals for an order authorizing the district court to consider the

application.” 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Smith’s prior habeas petition was

dismissed on the merits. Smith has not obtained from the Court of Appeals for the

Sixth Circuit authorization to file a successive petition in this court. When a

2

4:15-cv-11746-LVP-EAS Doc # 3 Filed 07/12/16 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 52
second or successive petition for habeas corpus relief is filed in the district court

without prior authorization, the district court must transfer the petition to the Court

of Appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. In re Sims, 111 F.3d 45, 47 (6th Cir.

1997).

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the District Court Clerk to transfer this

case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

SO ORDERED.

S/ Linda V. Parker

LINDA V. PARKER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: July 12, 2016

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record and/or

pro se parties on this date, July 12, 2016, by electronic and/or U.S. First Class mail.

S/ Kelly Winslow for Richard Loury 

Case Manager

3

4:15-cv-11746-LVP-EAS Doc # 3 Filed 07/12/16 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 53