alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014052EN.01001102.xml

| 22.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 December 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Association Vent De Colère! Fédération nationale and Others v Ministre de l’Écologie, du Développement durable, des Transports et du Logement, Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de l’Industrie

(Case C-262/12) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - State aid - Concept of ‘intervention by the State or through State resources’ - Wind-generated electricity - Obligation to purchase at a price higher than the market price - Offsetting in full - Charges payable by final consumers of electricity)

2014/C 52/17

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Association Vent De Colère! Fédération nationale, Alain Bruguier, Jean-Pierre Le Gorgeu, Marie-Christine Piot, Eric Errec, Didier Wirth, Daniel Steinbach, Sabine Servan-Schreiber, Philippe Rusch, Pierre Recher, Jean-Louis Moret, Didier Jocteur Monrozier

Applicants:

Defendants: Ministre de l’Écologie, du Développement durable, des Transports et du Logement, Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de l’Industrie

Defendants:

Intervener: Syndicat des énergies renouvelables

Intervener:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Conseil d’État (France) — Interpretation of Article 87 EC, now Article 107 TFEU — Concept of intervention by the State or through State resources — Obligation to purchase wind-generated electricity at a price higher than the market price — Additional costs offset in full — Change in the method of financing that offsetting — Charges payable by final consumers of electricity.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 107(1) TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that a mechanism for offsetting in full the additional costs imposed on undertakings because of an obligation to purchase wind-generated electricity at a price higher than the market price that is financed by all final consumers of electricity in the national territory, such as that resulting from Law No 2000-108 of 10 February 2000 on the modernisation and development of the public electricity service, as amended by Law No 2006-1537 of 7 December 2006 on the energy sector, constitutes an intervention through State resources.

---

(1)  OJ C 243, 11.8.2012

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.10 Procedures for requesting alternatives and waivers; termination of waivers. ( a ) The Coast Guard considers allowing the use of an alternative in place of a requirement in this part if— ( 1 ) The person wishing to use the alternative sends a written application to the Commandant (CG-ENG) explaining— ( i ) The requirement in this part that would not be met and the reason why;
( ii ) The alternative the person proposes to be substituted; and
( iii ) How the alternative would ensure a level of safety and pollution protection at least equal to that of the requirement for which the alternative would substitute;
( 2 ) The alternative does not substitute an operational standard for a design or equipment standard; and
( 3 ) The Commandant (CG-ENG) determines that the alternative provides a level of protection for purposes of safety and pollution at least equal to the requirement in this part.
( b ) The Coast Guard considers granting a waiver of a requirement for which this part allows a waiver if the person wishing the waiver sends a written application to the Commandant (CG-ENG) that includes— ( 1 ) A citation of the regulation that allows the waiver; and
( 2 ) Any information and pledges that the regulation requires to be submitted with the application for the waiver.
( c ) The Commandant notifies the applicant in writing— ( 1 ) Whether any further information is necessary to evaluate the request for an alternative or waiver; and
( 2 ) Of the outcome of the request for an alternative or waiver.
( d ) A waiver issued under this part terminates if any— ( 1 ) Information required to be supplied with the application for the waiver changes;
( 2 ) Pledges required to be supplied with the application for the waiver are repudiated;
( 3 ) Restrictions or procedures applying to operations under the waiver are violated; or
( 4 ) Requirements in the section of this part authorizing the waiver are violated.
[CGD 81-101, 52 FR 7780, Mar. 12, 1987]
§ 143.205 General. ( a ) Machinery and electrical systems must be designed and maintained to provide for safe operation of the towing vessel and safety of persons onboard under normal and emergency conditions.
( b ) The crew of each towing vessel must demonstrate the ability to operate the primary and auxiliary machinery and electrical systems for which they are responsible, and to do so under normal and emergency conditions. This includes, but is not limited to, responses to alarms and restoration of propulsion and steering in the event of failure.
( c ) Propulsion machinery, including main engines, reduction gears, shafting, bearings, and electrical equipment and systems, must: ( 1 ) Be maintained to ensure proper operation;
( 2 ) Be suitable for route and service; and
( 3 ) Have suitable propulsion controls to provide the operator full control at each operating station.
( d ) Repairs and minor alterations to existing towing vessels must be made in accordance with this part. New installations that are not replacements in kind must comply with the requirements of subpart C of this part, if applicable.
~ Fly a 4 point square box clockwise and rotate the phantom in the direction of travel.

----- ~ r----- ~ . ~
. ~

. ~
. ~
. ~ 

# , • . +~ 

# -------- ~ 

# --------- i ` ,,,, ` • ,,,,,• 

### ~ © Fly a circle counter-clockwise and keep the aircraft nose pointed in the direction of travel. Be sure to keep the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible.

„ 

# _-----
~ 

# ---__ _

. ,
~

,

. -



# --- 

# ► -------- -" ®

~ Fly a circle counter-clockwise with the aircraft nose • pointed at the center of the circle. Be sure to keep the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible.

• ~ 

## -L ~ 

# =

~_~~~~-- ---- I --- 

## -_ .odt ~ • ~ 

### , - , ~ 

### , ' =- -jl ~ 

### , . ~ 

# ,,a- - 

# , FU O 

# ~ - — — — — — • -- — ®

# ~ Fly a figure 8 without rotating the Phantom. Be sure to keep the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible.

• ` , ; 

# ~ ' ® $ 

# -------,__

~ •

` -'- 

# ~ ------- 

# ~ Fly a Figure 8 with the aircraft nose of the Phantom pointed in the direction of travel. Be sure to keep the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible. 

# r~ . 

## ~~ 

# h r~ ' — ' 

# A ffi

. ~ 

# 7 F T , ® $

.. 

# ~ -- 

# ~ -------



# ~ Fly Figure 8 patterns while experimenting with different orientations. For example, aircraft nose always pointed in a given direction or opposite/left/right the direction of travel. etc. Be sure to keep the altitude thesame and the circle as uniform as possible.

'- ~ 

# -' •,- ~y;'~~ --~ 

# ------_ ~ 

# ` _ - -

- ® $ 'I----- ~ -- ---------- ~,

•~ 

# _ ` ~ •~ ~ ~' ~ 

# . - 

# I ■ 1 ' --- ~ 

# -------- 

# r i

~ o ~ 

## ►

~~ 

# I I

# ~ Return Home & Land Mode Be sure you are in a large open area. Before you take off, make sure you have a good GPS lock by ensuring your LED indicators are flashing Green. Fly the Phantom at least 50ft away from your take off point. Turn off the Remote Controller. The Phantom will enter it 's failsafe Return-To-Home Mode. Let the Phantom finisf, it "s routine and land itself within 2 rneters of the take off point.

= uar

----- 

## ► - - - - - - - - - 

# ~ T o >< cQgo ,
~ 

# . ° 

# ® .

~ 15 meters ~ ®



## ~ ~ ® 

# © Intercepting Return Home & Land Mode Be sure you are in a large open area. Before you take off, make sure you have a good GPS lock by ensuring your LED indicators are flashing Green. Fly the Phantom 50ft away from your take off point. Turn off the Remote Controller. The Phantom will enter it "s failsafe Return-To-Home Mode. When the Phantom is returning home, you can intercept RTH Mode by switching the Sl Switch from the top position to the middle or lower position, then continue flying the Phantom.

i nrrr - - - - ► - - - - - 0



# • ® ~~. ~
~ 15 meters ~ ~ • 

# go

,~ 

# . ~ 

### ~ 

# o.,.. 

### Copyright:2014 DJl.lnnovations. AII Rights Reserved. ~
. ~
# C_2014253EN.01000301.xml

| 4.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 June 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — X BV (C-24/12), TBG Limited (C-27/12) v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Joined Cases C-24/12 and C-27/12) (1)

1

((Free movement of capital - Restrictions - Payment of dividends from a Member State to an overseas territory of the same State - Scope of EU law - Special European Union-OCTs arrangements))

2014/C 253/03

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: X BV (C-24/12), TBG Limited (C-27/12)

Applicant:

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Requests for a preliminary ruling — Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Interpretation of Articles 63 TFEU and 64 TFEU — Territorial scope — Movements of capital from a Member State to one of its overseas territories — Whether or not the overseas territory is to be regarded as a third country

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

EU law must be interpreted as not precluding a tax measure of a Member State which restricts movements of capital between that Member State and its own overseas country and territory whilst pursuing the objective of combating tax avoidance in an effective and proportionate manner.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 31.3.2012.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.660 Pipe welding. ( a ) Pipe welding must meet part 57 of this chapter.
( b ) Longitudinal butt welds, in piping that does not meet a standard or specification under § 56.60-1 of this chapter, and girth butt welds must meet the following: ( 1 ) Butt welds of pipes made from carbon, carbon manganese, or low alloy steels must meet § 56.50-105 of this chapter, including the requirements for post-weld heat treatment.
( 2 ) Except for piping inside an independent cargo tank type A, B, or C, butt welds must be 100% radiographically tested if the design temperature is lower than −10 °C (14 °F), and: ( i ) The wall thickness is greater than 10 mm (0.394 in.); or
( ii ) The nominal pipe diameter is greater than 100 mm (nominal 4 in.).
( 3 ) If Table 4 references this section, butt welds for deck cargo piping exceeding 75 mm (3 in.) in diameter must be 100% radiographically tested.
( 4 ) Butt welds of pipes not meeting paragraph (b)(2) or (b)(3) of this section must meet the non-destructive testing requirements under Subpart 56.95 of this chapter.
# C_2011145EN.01003302.xml

| 14.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/33

---

Action brought on 17 March 2011 — Häfele v OHIM (Infront)

(Case T-166/11)

2011/C 145/55

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Häfele GmbH & Co. KG (Nagold, Germany) (represented by M. Eck and J. Dönch, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 January 2011 in Case R 1711/2010-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 January 2011 in Case R 1711/2010-1;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘Infront’ for goods in Classes 6 and 20

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: rejection of the application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1) as the Community trade mark in question has distinctive character, is not descriptive and is not a designation which has become customary

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1)

1

---
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-10628 

 (consolidated with Case No. 15-11624) 

v. Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

VERSATA SOFTWARE, INC., et al, 

 Defendants. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE PARTIES’ 

JOINT MOTIONS TO SET CALENDAR DATES (ECF ## 482, 571) 

 On May 5, 2018, and on December 14, 2018, the parties filed joint motions to 

set calendar dates for the remainder of this action. (See ECF ## 482. 571.) The Court 

has reviewed the motions and the parties’ respective positions regarding the case 

calendar. Given the complex nature of this action, the time required for the Court to 

review, hold hearings, and rule on both currently-pending and forthcoming motions 

in this action (including multiple summary judgment motions), and in consideration 

of the other civil, criminal, and multi-district-litigation cases on the Court’s docket, 

the Court concludes that the dates proposed by Plaintiff Ford Motor Company in the 

December 14, 2018, joint motion are the most appropriate calendar dates for the 

remainder of this action. 

 Accordingly, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the 

joint motions and adopts the following calendar dates: 

3 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: January 8, 2019 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on January 8, 2019, by electronic means and/or ordinary 

mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (810) 341-9764
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             283
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      400
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (117)
<INVENTORY>                                         58
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   825
<PP&E>                                           8,595
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (870)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              680
<BONDS>                                          5,380
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,768
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,887
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,479
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,793
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   260
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    30
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 214
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    150
<INCOME-TAX>                                        67
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 83
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        83
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1896]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis 
Panel, R03/R21 SEP.
    Date: July 11, 2007.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Zoe E. Huang, MD, Health Science Administrator, 
Extramural Programs, National Library of Medicine, Rockledge 1 
Building, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20892-7968, 
301-594-4937, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94fce1f5faf3eed4f9f5fdf8bafafdfcbaf3fbe2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="38504d59565f42785559515416565150165f574e">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 11, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1896 Filed 4-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Elizabeth Fish and Frothingham Fish, *Administrators, etc., Appellants, v.*E. Judson Hawley, *Respondent, Impleaded, etc*.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.

Landon, J., not acting.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CRESTLINE CAPITAL CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AS OF THE TWENTY-FOUR WEEK PERIOD ENDED JUNE 16, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-16-2000
<CASH>                                          44,726
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,561
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         806,159
<DEPRECIATION>                                  70,770
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,023,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        413,335
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           224
<OTHER-SE>                                     403,721
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,023,031
<SALES>                                      2,182,977
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,182,977
<CGS>                                        2,124,992
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,124,992
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,405
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,673
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,775
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,668
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,107
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,107
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.23


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.007-3 Conditions of approval. ( a ) Structural insulation shall be of such quality as to successfully meet the requirements for an incombustible material as set forth in subpart 164.009 of this part.
( b ) Structural insulation shall be of such quality and thickness as to successfully pass all of the tests set forth in § 164.007-4, and the retests required by § 164.007-8.
( c ) The product shall be so marked as to be readily identifiable to an inspector in the field. The marking shall include the Coast Guard approval number.