Your web browser is not supported You're using Internet Explorer, some features might not work. Please switch to another browser like Chrome, Firefox, or Edge for a better experience.


An official website of the United States government Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Federal Election Commission | United States of America Calendar
           Glossary
          Search
              Search


Menu
      Home
      Campaign finance data
        All data
            Raising
            Spending
            Loans and debts
            Filings and reports
            Candidates
            Committees
            Bulk data
            Campaign finance statistics
        Find elections. Search by state or ZIP code
          Look up contributions from specific individuals
      Help for candidates and committees
        All compliance resources
            Guides
            Forms
            Dates and deadlines
            Trainings
        Learn about electronic filing
          Find and contact your committee's analyst
      Legal resources
        All legal resources
            Advisory opinions
            Enforcement
            Statutes
            Legislation
            Regulations
            Court cases
            Policy and other guidance
        Search across all legal resources
          Search guidance documents
      About
        All about the FEC
            News and announcements
            Commission meetings
            Mission and history
            Leadership and structure
            Reports about the FEC
            Careers
            Working with the FEC
            Contact
        Introduction to campaign finance and elections


- Home
- ›
      FEC Record: Litigation
- ›
      McCutcheon v. FEC: Supreme Court finds aggregate biennial limits unconstitutional

FEC Record: Litigation*McCutcheon v. FEC:* Supreme Court finds aggregate biennial limits unconstitutionalApril 15, 2014 On April 2, 2014, the Supreme Court issued a ruling in *McCutcheon v. FEC*that struck down the aggregate limits on the amount an individual may contribute during a two-year period to all federal candidates, parties and political action committees
    combined. By a vote of 5-4, the Court ruled that the biennial aggregate limits are unconstitutional under the First Amendment.  **Background** In 2012, Alabama resident Shaun McCutcheon and the Republican National Committee (together, plaintiffs) filed suit against the Commission challenging the Federal Election Campaign Act’s (the Act) biennial limits on an individual’s combined contributions
    to federal candidates, parties, and PACs. 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(3)(A) and (B).  By law, the biennial aggregate limits are indexed for inflation every two years. In 2011-12, the overall limit was $117,000, of which no more than $46,200 could go to federal candidates and $70,800 to PACs and party committees. Of the PAC/party total,
    no more than $46,200 could go to state and local party committees and PACs. The remainder was set aside for the national party committees.[FN1] Mr. McCutcheon contributed to 16 different federal candidates during the 2012 elections, complying with the base limits applicable to each (i.e., $2,500 per candidate, per election). He argued that the aggregate biennial limits prevented him from contributing
    to another 12 federal candidates and to a number of non-candidate political committees, including the Republican National Committee. The plaintiffs filed a complaint before a three-judge District Court, asserting that the aggregate limits were unconstitutional under the First Amendment. The District Court denied their motion for a preliminary injunction and granted the Commission’s
    motion to dismiss. The Supreme Court’s decision reverses the District Court’s decision and remands the case.  **Supreme Court decision** In the Court’s plurality opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, “The right to participate in democracy through political contributions is protected by the First Amendment, but that right is not absolute. Our cases have held that Congress may regulate
    campaign contributions to protect against corruption or the appearance of corruption. See, *e.g., Buckley v. Valeo*, 424 U.S. 1, 26-27 (1976) (*per curiam*).”  Roberts went on to write, “Congress may target only a specific type of corruption—‘*quid pro quo*’ corruption . . . Spending large sums of money in connection with elections, but not in connection with an effort to control the exercise of an officeholder’s
    official duties, does not give rise to *quid  pro quo* corruption. Nor does the possibility that an individual who spends large sums may garner ‘influence over or access to’ elected officials or political parties.” As a result, the Court concluded that “the aggregate limits on contributions do not further the only governmental interest this Court accepted as legitimate in *Buckley*. They instead intrude without justification on a citizen’s ability to exercise
    ‘the most fundamental First Amendment activities.’” While the Court’s decision removes the overall cap on individual contributions, it does not affect the Act’s base limits on individual contributions to federal candidate campaigns, PACs or party committees. Currently, individuals may contribute up to
    $2,600 per election to a federal candidate, $10,000 per calendar year to a state party committee, $32,400 per calendar year to a national party committee and $5,000 per calendar year to a PAC. The text of the Supreme Court’s opinion is available here. U.S. Supreme Court No. 12-536. 1*For 2013-14, the overall limit increased to $123,200, of which no more than  $48,600 could go to candidates and $74,600 to PACs and party committees.* **Resources:** The Supreme Court’s decision in *McCutcheon, et al. v. FEC* [PDF]
    *McCutcheon et al. v. FEC*litigation page
    Article: *James v. FEC*
 Author
          Alex  Knott


Read next: FEC to host May 21 seminar/webinar for trade associations, membership and labor organizations and their PACs (2014)
 Related: Explore campaign finance data »


This information is not intended to replace the law or to change its meaning, nor does this information create or confer any rights for or on any person or bind the Federal Election Commission or the public. The reader is encouraged also to consult the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (52 U.S.C. 30101 et seq.), Commission regulations (Title 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations), Commission advisory opinions and applicable court decisions.


About
          Careers
          Press
          Contact
   Privacy and security policy
          Plain language
          No FEAR Act
          Strategy, budget and performance
 Open government
          Protected Voices
          USA.gov
          Inspector General
          FOIA
 OpenFEC API
          GitHub repository
          Release notes
          FEC.gov status


Federal Election Commission
 The FEC's Twitter page
            The FEC's YouTube page Sign up for FECMail


Hide glossary Glossary Search terms