alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending March 4, 2006

|Filer                                     | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  | End of Comment Period                                 
|----------------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------
|STATE EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF UKRAINE, INC. | FBSEA          | Export-Import Bank of Ukraine ("EXIM Bank")Kiev, Ukraine, to establish a representative office in New York, New York, pursuant to Section 10(a) of the International Banking
Act of 1978, as amended, and Section 211.24(a)(1) of Regulation K. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                                | Not available 
|Federal Register:                         | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location         | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------ | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|BANK OF NY, NEW YORK, NEW YORK | 541101 | 05/16/2005 | 02/22/2006     | S         | Large Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Argued and submitted October 4,

appeal dismissed November 29, 1995

#### DELWAYNE THOMPSON, *Appellant, v.*Robert PRINSLOW, Marion County Sheriff, *Respondent.*

(93C12433; CA A82831)

906 P2d 310

Garrett Richardson argued the cause for appellant. On the brief was Christopher J. Shine, Multnomah Defenders, Inc.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*184PER CURIAM

Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. In his petition, he alleged that he had received inadequate assistance of counsel at his probation revocation proceeding.1 The claims petitioner raises on appeal have become moot, because he has completed the 180-day sentence imposed upon revocation. Our review of petitioner’s claims will have no practical effect on the rights of the parties involved. *Brumnett v. PSRB,*315 Or 402, 405, 848 P2d 1194 (1993); *State v. Chase,*120 Or App 523, 851 P2d 637 (1993).

Appeal dismissed.

1

 On March 22, 1993, petitioner was convicted of menacing, a misdemeanor offense, after entering a guilty plea. The court suspended execution of the 180-day sentence and placed petitioner on probation for 24 months. The court revoked petitioner’s probation and imposed the suspended sentence on July 9,1993, based on petitioner’s admissions that he violated his probation conditions.
Appendix A
Appendix A
Appendix A
Appendix A
Appendix A
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.2  


 
 

EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
  PARAMETERS OF AWARDS OF STOCK OPTIONS AND RESTRICTED SHARES    
    


	1.
	structure
two types of equity based awards:



	a.
	Performance Shares: Restricted Shares the vesting of which is based on the Corporation achieving agreed performance targets
("Performance Shares")



	i.
	These
Performance Shares will be earned over a defined performance period, with an additional period of time for vesting after the performance period



	ii.
	The
primary target for the Performance Shares will be based on the Net Income of the Corporation over a defined period



	iii.
	No
dividends will be accrued on the Performance Shares during the period during which the performance targets are measured. Following the performance period, and prior
to the full vesting of the Performance Shares, the dividends that would otherwise have been paid on the Performance Shares will not be paid but will be accrued until the vesting of the shares






	b.
	Options with Dividend Equivalent Rights ("ODERs") which vest after four years, contingent on the recipient's continued employment by the
Corporation, and have a ten year term



	c.
	Both
the Performance Shares and the ODERs will be subject to forfeiture prior to their vesting by a recipient that (i) terminates his employment with the Corporation without
Good Reason, and (ii) whose employment by the Corporation is terminated for Cause.






	2.
	award
these instruments as follows:



	a.
	Executive
and Senior Officers: annual awards of ODERs and Performance Shares, with two year performance targets and two year cliff vesting of the earned performance shares



	b.
	Other
Managers: periodic awards of ODERs only



	c.
	New
hires and other special situations are eligible to receive awards consistent with their positions in the Corporation as recommended by the Chief Executive Officer of the
Corporation and approved by the Compensation Committee.






	3.
	ownership
guidelines



	a.
	the
Board will establish ownership guidelines for the Corporation's Directors and Officers; Directors and Officers should own shares of the Corporation's common stock equal to a
multiple of the recipient's respective annual compensation as follows: 









	 
	 	 
	 	multiple
 

	i.	 	CEO	 	five
	ii.	 	Executive Officers	 	three
	iii.	 	Senior Officers	 	two
	iv.	 	Other Managers	 	n.a.






	b.
	the
Chief Executive Officer will recommend to the Board the portion of shares issued to managers under the Incentive Plan that the Corporation expects the managers to retain, after
providing for the sale of sufficient shares by the managers to meet their tax liabilities relative to the awards of the shares, with the target retention percentage expected to be not less than 60% of
the net, after tax value of shares received. 




ADOPTED,
AS AMENDED, BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON DECEMBER 16, 2004 











QuickLinks


EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN PARAMETERS OF AWARDS OF STOCK OPTIONS AND RESTRICTED SHARES
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2230 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a tax credit for 

teachers and principals who work in certain low income schools. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 4, 2009 

Mr. BOOZMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

a tax credit for teachers and principals who work in 

certain low income schools. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Teacher Tax Credit 

5 Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CREDIT FOR EDUCATORS IN CERTAIN ELEMENTARY 

7 OR SECONDARY SCHOOLS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subpart A of part IV of sub9 chapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 

10 1986 (relating to nonrefundable personal credits) is 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2230 IH

1 amended by inserting after section 25D the following new 

2 section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 25E. EDUCATORS IN CERTAIN ELEMENTARY AND 

4 SECONDARY SCHOOLS. 

5 ‘‘(a) ALLOWANCE OF CREDIT.—In the case of an eli6 gible educator, there shall be allowed as a credit against 

7 the tax imposed by this chapter for a taxable year an 

8 amount equal to $2,000. 

9 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section— 

10 ‘‘(1) ELIGIBLE EDUCATOR.—The term ‘eligible 

11 educator’ means, with respect to any taxable year, 

12 an individual who is a teacher, instructor, counselor, 

13 principal, or aide in any of grades kindergarten 

14 through 12 in an eligible elementary or secondary 

15 school for at least 900 hours during a school year. 

16 ‘‘(2) ELIGIBLE ELEMENTARY OR SECONDARY

17 SCHOOL.—The term ‘eligible elementary or sec18 ondary school’ means any school that is eligible for 

19 schoolwide assistance under section 1114(a)(1) of 

20 title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education 

21 Act of 1965.’’. 

22 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

23 for subpart A of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 

24 of such Code is amended by inserting after the item relat25 ing to section 25D the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 25E. Educators in certain elementary and secondary schools.’’. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2230 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2008. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending July 29, 2006

|Filer                         | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|FIRST HAWLEY BANCSHARES, INC. | CIC           | Jon W. Neumann, Hawley, Minnesota, to gain control of First Hawley Bancshares, Inc., Hawley, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly gain control of First National Bank, Hawley, Minnesota. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:08/18/2006
|Newspaper:                    | Not available
|Federal Register:             | 08/18/2006   
|TCF FINANCIAL CORPORATION     | * 3A3         | TCF Financial Corporation, Wayzata, Minnesota, proposes to acquire 100% of TCF National Bank Arizona, Mesa, Arizona, a de novo bank.                                                   | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:08/21/2006
|Newspaper:                    | Not available
|Federal Register:             | 08/21/2006   
|U.S. BANCORP                  | * 3A5         | U.S. Bancorp, Minneapolis, Minnesota, to acquire 100 percent of Vail Banks, Inc., Avon, Colorado, and thereby indirectly acquire WestStar Bank, Vail, Colorado.                        | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:07/31/2006
|Newspaper:                    | Not available
|Federal Register:             | 07/31/2006   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
----

----

Preamble

Table of Contents
          - Introduction 
          - Scope 
          - Qualification 
          - Calculation of Tier 1 Capital and Total Qualifying Capital 
          - Calculation of Risk-Weighted Assets 
          - Operational Risk 
          - Disclosure 

List of Acronyms

Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis

Paperwork Reduction Act

Plain Language

OCC Executive Order 12866

OTS Executive Order 12866 Determination

OCC Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 Determination

OTS Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 Determination

Proposed Regulatory Text

Table of Contents
        - Part I
        - General Provisions
        - Part II
        - Qualifying Capital
        - Part III
        - Qualification
        - Part IV
        - Risk-Weighted Assets for General Credit Risk
        - Part V 
        - Risk-Weighted Assets for Securitization Exposures
        - Part VI
        - Risk-Weighted Assets for Equity Exposures
        - Part VII
        - Risk-Weighted Assets for Operational Risk
        - Part VIII
        - Disclosure

List of Subjects

Authority and Issuance

OCC

Federal Reserve

FDIC

OTS

OCC

Federal Reserve

FDIC

OTS

Billing Codes

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4) (UMRA) requires cost-benefit and other analyses for a rule that would include any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any one year.  The current inflation-adjusted expenditure threshold is $119.6 million.  The requirements of the UMRA include assessing a rule�s effects on future compliance costs; particular regions or State, local, or tribal governments; communities; segments of the private sector; productivity; economic growth; full employment; creation of productive jobs; and the international competitiveness of U.S. goods and services.  The proposed rule qualifies as a significant regulatory action under the UMRA because its Federal mandates may result in the expenditure by the private sector of $119.6 million or more in any one year.  As permitted by section 202(c) of the UMRA, the required analyses have been prepared in conjunction with the Executive Order 12866 analysis document titled Regulatory Impact Analysis for Risk-Based Capital Standards:  Revised Capital Adequacy Guidelines.  The analysis is available on the Internet at http://www.occ.treas.gov/law/basel.htm under the link of �Regulatory Impact Analysis for Risk-Based Capital Standards: Revised Capital Adequacy Guidelines (Basel II), Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, International and Economic Affairs (2006)�.

Basel II Capital AccordNotice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR)

----

HomeBanking information and regulationAccessibilityContact us
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending April 15, 2006

|Filer                                  | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                            | End of Comment Period                                  
|-------------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------
|Boardwalk Bancorp, Inc                 | 3A1            | Boardwalk Bancorp, Inc, Linwood, NJ, to form a bank holding company by acquiring 100% of the voting shares of Boardwalk Bank, Linwood, NJ. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                             | Not applicable
|Federal Register:                      | Not applicable
|ROYAL BANCSHARES OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC. | * 3A3          | Royal Bancshares of Pennsylvania, Inc., Narberth, PA, to acquire Royal Asian Bank, Philadelphia.                                           | Newspaper:05/12/2006Federal Register:05/15/2006        
|Newspaper:                             | 05/12/2006    
|Federal Register:                      | 05/15/2006    

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Central Federal Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 12, 2006
    
    /s/ Therese Ann LiutkusTherese Ann Liutkus, CPATreasurer and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 130.420 Controls.

Each piece of machinery under automatic control must have an alternative manual means of control.
§ 195.11-25 Loading and stowage. ( a ) Vans required to be inspected and bearing a current inspection stamp may be accepted for loading and stowage by the master of the vessel who shall insure that the van is in good condition. ( 1 ) Vans containing scientific equipment and nonhazardous stores may be accepted by the master of the vessel subject to his inspection to determine that electrical and pressure connections are in good condition and adequate for the service intended.
( b ) The master shall insure that all vans are securely stowed and attached to the vessel to prevent shifting in a seaway. Portable vans to be occupied during the vessel's operation shall be securely attached to the vessel by welding, bolting, or equivalent means.
( c ) Vans shall be located with due regard to access and to prevent recirculation of the discharge from the exhaust systems of the vessel.
( d ) The loading of vans shall be in accordance with the stability requirements of the vessel.
( e ) Prior to a vessel's departure, an entry shall be made in the official logbook for each portable van placed on board that such van and its stowage are in compliance with the applicable requirements in this subchapter.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2344 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 10, 2009 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend section 114 of title 17, United States Code, to 

provide for agreements for the reproduction and performance of sound recordings by webcasters. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

HR 2344 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Webcaster Settlement 

3 Act of 2009’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF AGREEMENTS. 

5 Section 114(f)(5) of title 17, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘2008’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘2008, the Webcaster Settlement Act 

9 of 2009,’’; 

10 (2) in subparagraph (E)(iii), by striking ‘‘to 

11 make eligible nonsubscription transmissions and 

12 ephemeral recordings’’; and 

13 (3) in subparagraph (F), by striking ‘‘February 

14 15, 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘at 11:59 p.m. Eastern 

15 time on the 30th day after the date of the enactment 

16 of the Webcaster Settlement Act of 2009’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 9, 2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS