alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending February 18, 2006

|Filer                              | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             | End of Comment Period                          
|---------------------------------- | ----------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|FRONTIER BANCSHARES, INC.          | * 3A1       | Frontier Bancshares, Inc., Austin, Texas, and Frontier BN, Inc., Henderson, Nevada, to become bank holding companies by acquiring 100 percent of The First National Bank of Holland, Holland, Texas.                                                                        | Newspaper:03/13/2006Federal Register:03/13/2006
|Newspaper:                         | 03/13/2006 
|Federal Register:                  | 03/13/2006 
|TEXAS INDEPENDENT BANCSHARES, INC. | * 3A5       | Texas Independent Bancshares, Inc., Texas City, Texas, and T.I.B. Delaware, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware, to acquire by merger Southeast Bancorp of Texas, Inc., Winnie, Texas, and indirectly acquire SEBOT, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware, and Gulf Coast Bank, Winnie, Texas. | Newspaper:03/11/2006Federal Register:03/10/2006
|Newspaper:                         | 03/11/2006 
|Federal Register:                  | 03/10/2006 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for Second Quarter of 2006 (April 1, 2006 - June 30, 2006)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 249.11 Confidentiality. ( a ) If the data submitted under this rule contain information that the submitter considers to be commercial or financial information and privileged or confidential, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), the submitter shall assert a claim of exemption at the time the data are submitted. The claim shall be made in a letter contained in a sealed enveloped marked “Confidential Information,” addressed to the Secretary, Maritime Administration. The submitter shall stamp or mark “confidential” on the top of each page containing information claimed to be confidential.
( b ) In claiming an exemption under FOIA, the submitter must state the basis for such action, including supporting information showing: ( 1 ) That the information claimed to be confidential is a trade secret or commercial or financial information in accordance with statutory and decisional authority; and
( 2 ) that measures have been taken by the submitter of the information to ensure that the information has not been disclosed or otherwise made available to the public, or, if the information has been disclosed or otherwise becomes available to the public, why such disclosure or availability does not compromise the confidential nature of the information.
( c ) In the event of a subsequent request for any portion of the data under the FOIA, those submissions not so claimed by the submitter will be disclosed, and those so claimed will be subject to the initial determination by the Secretary, Maritime Administration.
( d ) If the Secretary makes a determination unfavorable to the submitter, the submitter will be advised that MARAD will not honor the request for confidentiality at the time of any request for production of information under the FOIA by third parties.
# C_2011211EN.01002801.xml

| 16.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/28

---

Action brought on 12 May 2011 — International Engine Intellectual Property Company v OHIM (PURE POWER)

(Case T-248/11)

2011/C 211/60

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: International Engine Intellectual Property Company, LLC (Warrenville, United States) (represented by: C. Thomas and B. Reiter, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 February 2011 in case R 2310/2010-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 February 2011 in case R 2310/2010-2;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings;

| — | Set a date for an oral hearing for the case that findings of the General Court are not possible without an oral hearing. |
| --- | --- |

—

Set a date for an oral hearing for the case that findings of the General Court are not possible without an oral hearing.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘PURE POWER’ for goods in class 12

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Trade Marks Department: Refused the application

Decision of the Trade Marks Department:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b), (c) and 7(2) of Council Regulation No 207/2009 as well as the ‘general principles of trademark law’, as the Board of Appeal found that the mark applied for was of descriptive character for the goods in respect of which registration was sought and devoid of any distinctiveness.

Pleas in law:

---
#  

# **Exhibit 23.1**

#  

# CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

#  

To the Board of Directors

Northern California Bancorp Inc.

Monterey, California

 

 

Wehereby consent to the use in the 10-KSB for the Northern CaliforniaBancorp Inc. of our report dated February 15, 2005 relating to thefinancial statements of the Northern California Bancorp Inc. as of December 31,2004 and 2003 and for the three years then ended.

 

 
| /s/ Hutchinson and Bloodgood, LLP |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|
| Watsonville, California           |
| March 17, 2005               |

 

 

1

----
# C_2011340EN.01003103.xml

| 19.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/31

---

Action brought on 26 September 2011 — France v Commission

(Case T-511/11)

2011/C 340/62

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: French Republic (represented by: E. Belliard, G. de Bergues, J. Gstalter and J. Rossi, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

By its application, the applicant asks the Court to annul decision C(2011) 4973 final of the European Commission concerning State aid No C 46/2003 relating to contributions to the Association nationale interprofessionnelle du bétail et des viandes (Interbev). The Commission considered that the voluntary contributions that had become compulsory, levied by Interbev, constituted State aid compatible with the internal market.

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law, the first of which is essentially identical or similar to that relied on in Case T-478/11 France v Commission.

France

Commission

The second plea alleges a breach by the Commission of its obligation to conduct the administrative procedure within a reasonable time.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          4,320
<SECURITIES>                                    1,990
<RECEIVABLES>                                  33,825
<ALLOWANCES>                                    5,442
<INVENTORY>                                    14,655
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               52,429
<PP&E>                                        170,689
<DEPRECIATION>                                 87,749
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                143,888
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         305,948
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            1
<OTHER-SE>                                  (168,219)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  143,888
<SALES>                                        73,274
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               73,274
<CGS>                                          52,414
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  71,994
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  182
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (1,353)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             15,102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (12,651)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (1,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (11,651)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0


</TABLE>
#### § 201.43 Service by parties.

All documents, when tendered for filing should show that service has been made upon all parties to the proceeding. Such service shall be made by delivering one copy to each party in person or by mailing by first-class mail properly addressed with postage prepaid. When a party has appeared by attorney or other representative, service upon such attorney or other representative will be deemed service upon the party. All documents served by mail preferably should be mailed in sufficient time to reach the parties on the date on which the original is due to be filed and should be air mailed if addressee is more than 300 miles distant.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 11
Federal Reserve Bank of: Dallas

## Filings received during the week ending January 14, 2006

|Filer                                   | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      | End of Comment Period                          
|--------------------------------------- | ----------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|CITIZENS BANKSHARES OF SPRINGHILL, INC. | CIC         | Notice by Citizens Bankshares of Springhill, Inc., ESOP, Springhill, Louisiana, and Argent Trust, A Division of National Independent Trust Co., Trustee, Ruston, Louisiana, to retain ownership and control of 10.53 percent of Citizens Bankshares of Springhill, Inc., Springhill, Louisiana, and indirectly Citizens Bank & Trust Company, Springhill, Louisiana. | Newspaper:01/24/2006Federal Register:01/27/2006
|Newspaper:                              | 01/24/2006 
|Federal Register:                       | 01/27/2006 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 185.260 Reports of potential vessel casualty. ( a ) An owner, charterer, managing operator, or agent of a vessel shall immediately notify either of the following Coast Guard offices if there is reason to believe the vessel is lost or imperiled: ( 1 ) The Coast Guard district rescue coordination center (RCC) cognizant over the area in which the vessel was last operating; or
( 2 ) The Coast Guard search and rescue authority nearest to where the vessel was last operating.
( b ) Reasons for belief that a vessel is in distress include, but are not limited to, lack of communication with or nonappearance of the vessel.
( c ) The owner, charterer, managing operator, or agent notifying the Coast Guard under paragraph (a) of this section, shall provide the name and identification number of the vessel, a description of the vessel, the names or number of individuals on board, and other information that may be requested by the Coast Guard.
§ 176.615 Underwater Survey in Lieu of Drydocking (UWILD). ( a ) The Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI), may approve an underwater survey instead of a drydock examination at alternating intervals if your vessel is— ( 1 ) Less than 15 years of age;
( 2 ) A steel or aluminum hulled vessel;
( 3 ) Fitted with an effective hull protection system; and
( 4 ) Described in § 176.600(b) or (c) of this part.
( b ) For vessels less than 15 years of age, you must submit an application for an underwater survey to the OCMI at least 90 days before your vessel's next required drydock examination. The application must include— ( 1 ) The procedure for carrying out the underwater survey;
( 2 ) The time and place of the underwater survey;
( 3 ) The method used to accurately determine the diver's or remotely operated vehicle's (ROV) location relative to the hull;
( 4 ) The means for examining all through-hull fittings and appurtenances;
( 5 ) The condition of the vessel, including the anticipated draft of the vessel at the time of survey;
( 6 ) A description of the hull protection system; and
( 7 ) The name and qualifications of any third party examiner.
( c ) If your vessel is 15 years old or older, the cognizant District Commander, may approve an underwater survey instead of a drydock examination at alternating intervals (UWILD). You must submit an application for an underwater survey to the OCMI at least 90 days before your vessel's next required drydock examination. You may be allowed this option if— ( 1 ) The vessel is qualified under paragraphs (a)(2) through (4) of this section;
( 2 ) Your application includes the information in paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(7) of this section; and
( 3 ) During the vessel's drydock examination, preceding the underwater survey, a complete set of hull gaugings was taken and they indicated that the vessel was free from appreciable hull deterioration.
( d ) After the drydock examination required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the OCMI submits a recommendation for future underwater surveys, the results of the hull gauging, and the results of the Coast Guards' drydock examination results to the cognizant District Commander for review.
[USCG-2000-6858, 67 FR 21084, Apr. 29, 2002]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the
"Form 10-QSB") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").

     I, Tracey A. Welsh, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of the Issuer, certify that:

     (i)  the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
          78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

Dated: November 14, 2005


                                        /s/ Tracey A. Welsh
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Tracey A. Welsh
                                        Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
                                        Officer and Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,482
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              26
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,390
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            45,520
<LOANS>                                        165,057
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,776
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 219,726
<DEPOSITS>                                     170,366
<SHORT-TERM>                                    15,016
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,215
<LONG-TERM>                                      7,486
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,237
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,643
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 219,726
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,281
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  693
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     6
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,980
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,636
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,958
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,022
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      105
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,266
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    793
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         594
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       594
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,797
<LOANS-PAST>                                       329
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,832
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      171
<RECOVERIES>                                        10
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,776
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,776
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>