alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011226EN.01003102.xml

| 30.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/31

---

Action brought on 12 May 2011 — ZZ v European Commission

(Case F-56/11)

2011/C 226/62

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision to downgrade the applicant by two grades in the same function group.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority of 6 July 2010 downgrading the applicant by two grades in the same function group following the decision of the Appointing Authority of 16 November 2009 opening disciplinary proceedings against the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority of 6 July 2010 downgrading the applicant by two grades in the same function group following the decision of the Appointing Authority of 16 November 2009 opening disciplinary proceedings against the applicant;

| — | Order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
§ 171.112 Watertight door openings. ( a ) The opening for a watertight door must be located as high in the bulkhead and as far inboard as practicable.
( b ) No more than one door, other than a door to a bunker or shaft alley, may be fitted in a main transverse watertight bulkhead within spaces containing the following: ( 1 ) Main and auxiliary propulsion machinery.
( 2 ) Propulsion boilers.
( 3 ) Permanent bunkers.
§ 169.601 General. ( a ) The regulations in this subpart contain requirements for the design, construction and installation of machinery on sailing school vessels.
( b ) Machinery must be suitable in type and design for the purpose intended. Installations of an unusual type and those not addressed by this subpart are subject to the applicable regulations in Subchapter F (Marine Engineering) and Subchapter J (Electrical Engineering) of this chapter.
( c ) The use of liquefied inflammable gases, such as propane, methane, butane, etc., as fuel, except for cooking purposes, is prohibited.
# C_2011130EN.01001702.xml

| 30.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/17

---

Action brought on 2 March 2011 — Gbagbo v Council

(Case T-119/11)

2011/C 130/31

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Simone Gbagbo (Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire) (represented by: J. –C. Tchikaya, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011 amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire, and Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire, to the extent that they concern the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011 amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire, and Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire, to the extent that they concern the applicant;

| — | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments raised by the applicant are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-118/11 Attey v Council.

Attey

Council

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

SEAN MICHAEL RYAN,

Petitioner,

Case No. 14-11611

v.

Honorable Linda V. Parker

WILLIAM SMITH,

Respondent.

_______________________________/

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO 

REOPEN HABEAS CORPUS PETITION (ECF NO. 93)

Michigan prisoner Sean Michael Ryan (“Petitioner”) filed a pro se habeas 

corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his state court convictions for 

seven counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Michigan 

Compiled Laws Section 750.520b(1)(a) (penetration of a person under thirteen 

years of age). On May 16, 2017, this Court issued an opinion and order 

concluding that Petitioner is not entitled to habeas relief and declining to issue 

Petitioner a certificate of appealability. (ECF No. 80.) Petitioner’s attempt to 

appeal the decision to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals was unsuccessful when 

that court also denied Petitioner a certificate of appealability. (ECF No. 85.) The 

United States Supreme Court denied his petition for the writ of certiorari on June 

11, 2018. (ECF No. 90.) Petitioner has tried, unsuccessfully, to resurrect his 

Case 4:14-cv-11611-LVP-MKM ECF No. 94, PageID.1492 Filed 08/30/21 Page 1 of 3
habeas petition (see ECF No. 92), and now asks this Court to reopen the petition to 

reargue his Fourth Amendment and ineffective assistance of counsel claims 

“[b]ecause [t]he ruling that this honorable court made the first time were contrary 

to the rule of stare decisis and was also contrary to the clearly established law of 

the United States Supreme Court” (ECF No. 93).

Neither the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals nor the United States Supreme 

Court agree with Petitioner’s assessment of this Court’s May 16, 2017 decision. 

Petitioner has exhausted the avenues available to challenge that decision and the 

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 prevents him from pursuing 

an amended or second petition here. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A).

For those reasons,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion to reopen his habeas petition is 

DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that these habeas proceedings are closed and 

Petitioner shall file no additional motions under this case number.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

s/ Linda V. Parker

LINDA V. PARKER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: August 30, 2021

Case 4:14-cv-11611-LVP-MKM ECF No. 94, PageID.1493 Filed 08/30/21 Page 2 of 3
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of

record and/or pro se parties on this date, August 30, 2021, by electronic and/or

U.S. First Class mail.

s/Aaron Flanigan

Case Manager

Case 4:14-cv-11611-LVP-MKM ECF No. 94, PageID.1494 Filed 08/30/21 Page 3 of 3
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. No. 94-9152. Margery A. MORSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. NATIONAL INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.; Pan American Life Insurance Company; The Shaw Agency; Scott Hankins, Defendants-Appellees. April 11, 1996. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (No. 1:92-cv-2686-RLV), Robert L. Vining, Jr., Judge. ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion February 12, 1996, 11th Cir., 1996, 74 F.3d 1135). Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, and KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be r eheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO
SENTRON INC.'S REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 2, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                                 14,144
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          26,443
<ALLOWANCES>                                            1,367
<INVENTORY>                                            16,029
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       59,438
<PP&E>                                                  6,667
<DEPRECIATION>                                          2,910
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        140,164
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  50,262
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                   99
<OTHER-SE>                                             88,894
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          140,164
<SALES>                                                98,763
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       98,763
<CGS>                                                  61,621
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          61,621
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        2,823
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          260
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      1,060
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         9,405
<INCOME-TAX>                                            3,686
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     5,719
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                            5,719
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.59
        

</TABLE>
§ 194.10-15 Magazine van construction. ( a ) Vans shall be of substantial metal construction. Their interior shall be insulated with an approved incombustible insulation to the standards required for A-15 divisional bulkheads as prescribed in part 72 of Subchapter H (Passenger Vessels) of this chapter. The interior shall be lined flush with incombustible materials.
( b ) Lighting fixtures, if installed, shall be of an approved type equipped with globes and guards. All electrical installations shall meet the applicable requirements of Subchapter J (Electrical Engineering) of this chapter. The electrical terminals for connections to the ship's electrical system shall be of watertight construction and bear a label plate denoting the power requirement of the van.
( c ) Access doors and ventilation closures shall be of watertight construction. Doors shall be provided with means whereby they may be securely locked.
( d ) Vans shall be provided with suitable pads and clips for securing to the deck and for installation of wire rope sway braces.
( e ) Vans shall bear a label plate stating light weight, gross weight and weight of explosives. Gross weight shall not exceed 250 pounds per square foot of deck area.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 12, 2017

a0906 

# Order

Clerk September 12, 2017

154108(90)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154108

COA: 322195

Wayne CC: 13

- 009830

- FC

SHAROC RICHARDSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 2, 2017

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appea r that the order was

entered erroneously.
Exhibit 10.5

AMENDMENT NUMBER FOUR

to the

EDS 1998 SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIRMENT PLAN

Section 6.2(a) of the EDS
1998 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the Plan) provides that the Compensation and Benefits Committee (the Committee) of the Board of Directors of Electronic Data Systems Corporation, a Delaware corporation
(EDS), may amend the Plan at any time. In accordance with that authority the Committee amended the Plan on October 20, 2005 in the manner set forth below. This is the fourth amendment to the Plan, with the first, second and third
amendments having been adopted on October 20, 2003, February 3, 2004 and July 23, 2004, respectively.

1.
Section 3.1(a) is deleted in its entirety and is replaced with the following new Section 3.1(a):



| | (a) | be designated as a Participant by the Compensation and Benefits Committee, which designation is reflected on the attached Schedule A, as amended from time to time.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. This Amendment is effective October 20, 2005.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment Number Four is executed on this 31stday of July, 2006.



COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATIONFOR THE COMMITTEE:/S/ M.E. PAOLUCCIMichael E. Paolucci, Secretary
# - dep

west virginia 

### department of environmental protection Di visio n of A ir Qualit y 60 I 57 "' Stree t SE Charle s t on, WV 25304 Phone 304 /926 -0475 • FA X : 304/926 -047 9

M s. Diana Es her, Director Air Protection Division USEPA Region III 1650 Arch Street (3APOO) Philadelphi a, PA 19103-2029

Dear Ms. Es her: Junel0 , 2011 Earl Ray Tomb lin , Gove rno r Rand y C. Huffm an , Ca bin et Secreta!)' www.dep.wv
.gov

RE: Propo s ed Air Qua lity Rule s for 20 12 Legislative Session

Enclosed i s a notice of public comment period a nd public hearin gs, a nd a copy of t e n (1 0) proposed a ir qua li ty rules: 45 C SR8 , 45CSR14 , 45 C SR16, 45CSR18 , 45CSR19 , 45 C SR25 , 45CSR30 , 45CSR34, 45CSR35 and 45CSR42 for the West Virg ini a Dep artment of Environmental Protection , Div i s ion ofAir Quality (DAQ). Once the s e rule s hav e been authori ze d and promul gated by the W es t Virg inia Le g i s lature, the DAQ i s proposing to adopt them in the Spring of2012. Please note the DAQ wi ll accept written comments on the proposed rules up to and including July 11 , 20 11. In additi on, the age ncy wi ll rec eive ora l comments at a public hearing to be held on July 11 ,2 011 , beginning at 6:00p.m. The a ttached public notice describes which rule s the agency is propo s in g and what action the DAQ intend s to request of the U
. S. E nvironmental Protection Agency upon the authorization a nd promulgation of the rules in the Spring of 2012. Plea se s ubmit any written co mments to my attention at th e above a ddress, or fee l free to ca ll me with any qu es tion s regardin g this matter at ( 3 04) 926-0462.

JAB / jlm E nclo s ures Dir ec tor

Promoting a healthy environment.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 12
Federal Reserve Bank of: San Francisco

## Filings received during the week ending November 4, 2006

|Filer              | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                      | End of Comment Period                              
|------------------ | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|ALTA ALLIANCE BANK | * Branch       | Alta Alliance Bank, Oakland, California, to establish a mobile branch courier service to serve the counties of Contra Costa, Alameda, and San Francisco, California. | Newspaper:11/06/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:         | 11/06/2006    
|Federal Register:  | Not applicable
|COUNTY BANK        | * Branch       | County Bank, Merced, California, to establish a branch facility at 1305 Main Street, Newman, California.                                                             | Newspaper:11/03/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:         | 11/03/2006    
|Federal Register:  | Not applicable
|PLACER SIERRA BANK | * Branch       | Placer Sierra Bank, Auburn, California, to establish a branch facility at 2051 Arena Boulevard, Sacramento, California.                                              | Newspaper:11/10/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:         | 11/10/2006    
|Federal Register:  | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
# C_2013063EN.01001505.xml

| 2.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/15

---

Order of the President of the Court of 11 December 2012 — European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria

(Case C-307/12) (1)

1

2013/C 63/29

Language of the case: Bulgarian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 295, 29.9.2012.

1

---
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, George L. Ball, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ GEORGE L. BALLGeorge
      L. BallChief
      Executive Officer





August
10, 2009





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sanders Morris Harris
Group Inc. and will be retained by Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
§ 196.15-55 Requirements for fuel oil. ( a ) It shall be the duty of the chief engineer to cause an entry in the log to be made of each supply of fuel oil received on board, stating the quantity received, the name of the vendor, the name of the oil producer, and the flashpoint (closed cup test) for which it is certified by the producer.
( b ) It shall be the further duty of the chief engineer to cause to be drawn and sealed and suitably labeled at the time the supply is received on board, a half-pint sample of each lot of fuel oil. These samples shall be preserved until the particular supply of oil is exhausted.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Fusion Telecommunications International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

> 
**FUSION TELECOMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC.**

November 15, 2010             By: / s / **MATTHEW D. ROSEN**

                                                 Matthew D. Rosen

                                                 Chief Executive Officer

November 15, 2010             By: / s / **GORDON HUTCHINS, JR.**

                                                 Gordon Hutchins, Jr.

                                                 President, Chief Operating Officer, and Acting Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
#### § 28.840 Means for stopping pumps, ventilation, and machinery.

All electrically driven fuel oil transfer pumps, fuel oil unit and service pumps, and ventilation fans shall be fitted with remote controls from a readily accessible position outside of the space concerned so that they may be stopped in the event of fire occurring in the compartment in which they are located. These controls shall be suitably protected against accidental operation or tampering and shall be suitably marked.