USA CUN13 SOIL Strawberry Nursery Open Field -CA

Page 1 of 8

NOMINATING PARTY: The United States of America

FILE NAME: USA CUN13 SOIL STRAWBERRY NURSERY Open Field 

BRIEF DESCRIPTIVE TITLE OF NOMINATION:

Methyl Bromide Critical Use Nomination for Preplant Soil Use for Strawberry Nursery in Open 

Fields (Submitted in 2011 for the 2013 Use Season)

CROP NAME (OPEN FIELD OR PROTECTED): Strawberry Nursery Open Field

QUANTITY OF METHYL BROMIDE NOMINATED:

TABLE 1. QUANTITY OF METHYL BROMIDE NOMINATED

Year NOMINATION AMOUNT 

2013 3,752 kg

NOMINATING PARTY CONTACT DETAILS:

Contact Person: John Thompson

Title: Division Director

Address: Office of Environmental Policy

U.S. Department of State

2201 C Street, N.W. Room 2658

Washington, D.C. 20520

U.S.A.

Telephone: (202) 647-9799

Fax: (202) 647-5947

E-mail: thompsonje2@state.gov

Following the requirements of Decision IX/6 paragraph (a)(1) The United States of America has determined that the 

specific use detailed in this Critical Use Nomination is critical because the lack of availability of methyl bromide for 

this use would result in a significant market disruption. ■ Yes  No

Signature Name Date

Title: 

(Details on this page are requested under Decision Ex. I/4(7), for posting on the Ozone Secretariat website under 

Decision Ex. I/4(8).) 

In assessing nominations submitted in this format, TEAP and MBTOC will also refer to the original nomination on 

which the Party’s first-year exemption was approved, as well as any supplementary information provided by the 

Party in relation to that original nomination. As this earlier information is retained by MBTOC, a Party need not 

re-submit that earlier information. 
USA CUN13 SOIL Strawberry Nursery Open Field -CA

Page 2 of 8

CONTACT OR EXPERT(S) FOR FURTHER TECHNICAL DETAILS:

Contact/Expert Person: Jack Housenger

Title: Director

Address: Biological and Economic Analysis Division

Office of Pesticide Programs

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Mailcode 7503P

Washington, D.C. 20460

U.S.A.

Telephone: (703) 308-8200

Fax: (703) 308-7042

E-mail: Housenger.Jack@epa.gov

LIST OF DOCUMENTS SENT TO THE OZONE SECRETARIAT IN OFFICIAL NOMINATION PACKAGE:

1. PAPER DOCUMENTS: 

Title of paper documents and appendices

No. of pages Date sent to Ozone 

Secretariat

2. ELECTRONIC COPIES OF ALL PAPER DOCUMENTS: 

*Title of each electronic file (for naming convention see notes above)

No. of 

kilobytes 

Date sent to Ozone 

Secretariat

USA CUN13 SOIL STRAWBERRY NURSERY Open Field 

* Identical to paper documents
USA CUN13 SOIL Strawberry Nursery Open Field -CA

Page 3 of 8

METHYL BROMIDE CRITICAL USE RENOMINATION FOR 

PREPLANT SOIL USE (OPEN FIELD OR PROTECTED ENVIRONMENT)

STRAWBERRY NURSERY

1. SUMMARY OF THE NEED FOR METHYL BROMIDE AS A CRITICAL USE 

Methyl bromide has been the long-time standard in nurseries for the treatment of soils to achieve 

pest-free certification of nursery stock. The U.S. is nominating strawberry nurseries in 

California for a critical use exemption for methyl bromide for use in 2013 (Table 1). Currently

in California only methyl bromide and 1,3-D are specified treatments for nursery stock 

certification (e.g., CDFA, 2009—NIPM #7). By regulation, the use of 1,3-D is limited to soils 

where soil moisture and texture are amenable to nematicidal activity. According to the 

California Strawberry Nursery Association growers on sandy soils have been able to use 1,3-

D/chloropicrin mixtures as an approved treatment but the nomination is for the critical use of 

methyl bromide on 19 ha where 1,3-D is not an approved treatment, is not economically feasible 

or is limited by township caps. No other alternate strategies are approved for certification 

purposes.

The U.S. Government (USG) has reviewed all factors affecting transition rates in this sector.

Based on this assessment the transition rate has been greatly increased for this sector. For the 

area covered in this nomination, the USG believes that the narrative discussion included in this 

document is technically valid. The USG has nominated amounts of methyl bromide based only 

on those sub-sectors that cannot transition away from methyl bromide at the accelerated rate.

2. SUMMARIZE WHY KEY ALTERNATIVES ARE NOT FEASIBLE

California nurseries currently use methyl bromide on all of their land for transplants designated 

as quarantine pre-shipment (QPS), which makes up 99% of methyl bromide use by nurseries. 

For the 2013 season, methyl bromide continues to be critical for California strawberry nurseries 

for 22 ha of non-QPS uses where there are regulatory restrictions on 1,3-D and chloropicrin.

Regulations in California on the use of 1,3-D and chloropicrin restrict their use in some 

locations, such as clay soils and where township caps are in place. Research trials in California

have indicated that iodomethane/chloropicrin, 1,3-D/chloropicrin followed by dazomet, and 

chloropicrin followed by dazomet provided similar pest control in runner nurseries when 

compared to methyl bromide/chloropicrin (e.g., Fennimore et al., 2008a; Kabir et al., 2005). The 

use of low permeable films has improved efficacy of alternatives. 

3. IS THE USE COVERED BY A CERTIFICATION STANDARD?

The certification for strawberry nurseries (e.g., CDFA, 2009) located in California includes zero 

tolerance for damaging diseases and plant-parasitic nematodes in order to minimize the spread of 
USA CUN13 SOIL Strawberry Nursery Open Field -CA

Page 4 of 8

these pests to production fields. State authorities may determine appropriate measures to achieve 

pest-free designation. California describes methods to prepare field soils using methyl bromide 

or 1,3-D (CDFA, 2009—NIPM #7). California regulations (e.g., CDFA, 2009—NIPM #3) for 

nursery standards (reg. 3060.2-a) include:

“All nursery stock shall be kept ‘commercially’ clean with respect to established pests of general 

distribution. Commercially clean shall mean that pests are under effective control, are present 

only to a light degree, and that only a few of the plants in any lot or block of nursery stock or on 

the premises show any infestation or infection, and of these none show more than a few 

individuals of any insect, animal or weed pests, or more than a few individual infestations of any 

plant disease.” 

4. IF PART OF THE CROP AREA IS TREATED WITH METHYL BROMIDE, 

INDICATE THE REASON WHY METHYL BROMIDE IS NOT USED IN THE OTHER 

AREA, AND IDENTIFY WHAT ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES ARE USED TO 

CONTROL THE TARGET PATHOGENS AND WEEDS WITHOUT METHYL 

BROMIDE THERE.

All nurseries currently treat soils with methyl bromide. This nomination is only for 

approximately 1% of nursery soils not designated as QPS and where 1,3-D is not effective or 

available due to regulatory requirements of soil type, moisture, or township caps.

5. WOULD IT BE FEASIBLE TO EXPAND THE USE OF THESE METHODS TO 

COVER AT LEAST PART OF THE CROP THAT HAS REQUESTED USE OF 

METHYL BROMIDE? WHAT CHANGES WOULD BE NECESSARY TO ENABLE 

THIS?

As previously stated, methyl bromide is critical for the small number of non-QPS hectares that 

cannot be treated with 1,3-D due to soil type, moisture, or township caps. The USG has 

reviewed all factors affecting transition rates in this sector. Based on this assessment the 

transition rate has been greatly increased for most portions of this sector. For the area covered in 

this nomination, the USG believes that the narrative discussion included in this document is 

technically valid. The USG has nominated amounts of methyl bromide based only on those subsectors that cannot transition away from methyl bromide at the accelerated rate.

6. SUMMARY OF RECENT RESEARCH 

Research results for strawberry nurseries were not presented at the MBAO meeting in 2010. 

Previous research for the strawberry runner nurseries in California (e.g., Fennimore et al., 2008a; 

Kabir et al., 2005) has indicated that in research plots some alternatives appear to provide pest 

management levels comparable to traditional methyl bromide treatments. However, restrictions 

or lack of efficacy of 1,3-D has resulted in the critical need for methyl bromide for a small 

portion of California nurseries.
USA CUN13 SOIL Strawberry Nursery Open Field -CA

Page 5 of 8

Previous research (e.g., Larson and Shaw, 2007) suggested that inconsistent efficacy of 

alternatives remains the greatest problem for transition to alternatives by this industry (this was 

also the case for nurseries in Spain; see, e.g., Garcia-Mendez et al., 2007). Alternatives that have 

been evaluated in research trials over the past several years are 1,3-D/chloropicrin, 1,3-

D/chloropicrin + metam-sodium, 1,3-D and metam-sodium, and dazomet as a follow-up 

application to 1,3-D/chloropicrin or chloropicrin (Fennimore et al., 2008b). 

For the effective production of runner plants, weeds must be kept to a minimum. Recently a 

report on weed control was published (Fennimore et al., 2008a). Results indicated that 

iodomethane/chloropicrin, 1,3-D/chloropicrin followed by dazomet, chloropicrin followed by 

dazomet, and methyl bromide/chloropicrin all provided comparable weed control with similar 

hand-weeding costs. Costs of iodomethane for California nurseries were considered uncertain 

since it is not currently on the market for commercial use in California. A cost analysis for 

alternatives for California strawberry nurseries is presented in this document. 

The industry continues to refine protocols for effective alternatives, but this requires several 

seasons of data gathering. For example, the use of 1,3-D/chloropicrin followed by dazomet or 

chloropicrin followed by dazomet appeared more effective in nursery trials in California (Kabir 

et al., 2005) than previous nursery trials where chloropicrin was applied alone (Larson and 

Shaw, 2000). Fennimore et al. (2008b) found variable effects and indicated that further research 

is necessary to optimize the treatment regime. By optimizing methods identified through 

research alternative strategies are being identified. 

7. ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF ALTERNATIVES 

This study calculated net revenue as gross revenue minus operating costs. This is a good 

measure of the direct losses of income that may be suffered by the users. It should be noted that 

net revenue does not represent net income to the users. Net income, which indicates profitability

of an operation for an enterprise, is gross revenue minus the sum of operating and fixed costs. 

Net income is smaller than the net revenue measured in this study, often substantially so. We did

not include fixed costs because they are difficult to measure and verify.

The economic analysis of the strawberry nursery applications compared data on yields, crop 

prices, revenues and costs using methyl bromide and using alternative pest control regimens in 

order to estimate the loss of methyl bromide availability. The alternatives identified as 

technically feasible – in cases of low pest infestation1– for California are 1,3-D + chloropicrin 

followed by metam sodium. Iodomethane plus chloropicrin was registered in California on 

December of 2010. However, the rates are lower than those previously tested on strawberry

nursery plants and the buffers are up to 10 times larger than the rest of the U.S.

The economic factors that really drives the feasibility analysis for nursery stock production uses 

of methyl bromide are: (1) yield losses, referring to reductions in the quantity produced, (2) 

 

1

The USG does not request methyl bromide for use in areas of low to moderate pest pressure. Only cases where 

key pests are present at moderate to high levels require methyl bromide for pest pressure.
USA CUN13 SOIL Strawberry Nursery Open Field -CA

Page 6 of 8

increased production costs, which may be due to the higher-cost of using an alternative, 

additional pest control requirements, and/or resulting shifts in other production or harvesting 

practices (3) quality losses, which generally affect the quantity and price received for the goods, 

and (4) missed market windows due to plant back time restrictions, which also affect the quantity

and price received for the goods.

The economic reviewers then analyzed crop budgets for pre-plant sectors to determine the likely 

economic impact if methyl bromide were unavailable. Various measures were used to quantify

the impacts, including the following: 

(1) Loss per Hectare. For crops, this measure is closely tied to income. It is relatively easy to 

measure, but may be difficult to interpret in isolation.

(2) Loss per Kilogram of Methyl Bromide. This measure indicates the value of methyl 

bromide to crop production.

(3) Loss as a Percentage of Gross Revenue. This measure has the advantage that gross 

revenues are usually easy to measure, at least over some unit, e.g., a hectare of land or a storage 

operation. However, high value commodities or crops may provide high revenues but may also 

entail high costs. Losses of even a small percentage of gross revenues could have important 

impacts on the profitability of the activity.

(4) Loss as a Percentage of Net Operating Revenue. We define net cash revenues as gross 

revenues minus operating costs. This is a very good indicator as to the direct losses of income 

that may be suffered by the owners or operators of an enterprise. However, operating costs can 

often be difficult to measure and verify.

(5) Operating Profit Margin. We define operating profit margin to be net operating revenue 

divided by gross revenue per hectare. This measure would provide the best indication of the 

total impact of the loss of methyl bromide to an enterprise. Again, operating costs may be 

difficult to measure and fixed costs even more difficult, therefore fixed costs were not included 

in the analysis.

These measures represent different ways to assess the economic feasibility of methyl bromide 

alternatives for methyl bromide users, who are strawberry nursery producers in this case. 

Because producers (suppliers) represent an integral part of any definition of a market, we 

interpret the threshold of significant market disruption to be met if there is a significant impact 

on commodity suppliers using methyl bromide. The economic measures provide the basis for 

making that determination.

California strawberry nursery growers are not expected to see any yield or quality impacts with 

1,3-D/chloropicrin plus metam sodium (Table 2). But, the new registration of iodomethane plus 

chloropicrin in California is at a rate lower than those previously tested and may lead to yield 

and quality losses.
USA CUN13 SOIL Strawberry Nursery Open Field -CA

Page 7 of 8

TABLE 2. CALIFORNIA STRAWBERRY GROWERS ASSOCIATION : ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF METHYL BROMIDE 

ALTERNATIVES.

CALIFORNIA SGA METHYL BROMIDE

IODOMETHANE

(REG. DEC 2010)

1,3 D + PIC

FB METAM

PRODUCTION LOSS (%) 0% 0% 10%

 PRODUCTION PER HECTARE 372 372 235

* PRICE PER UNIT (US$) $ 110.23 $ 110.23 $ 110.23

= GROSS REVENUE PER HECTARE (US$) $ 41,019 $ 41,019 $ 36,918

- OPERATING COSTS PER HECTARE (US$)** $ 28,585 $ 43,295 $ 44,788

= NET REVENUE PER HECTARE (US$) $ 12,434 $ (2,276) $ (7,870)

LOSS MEASURES *

1. LOSS PER HECTARE (US$) $ 0 $ 14,710 $ 20.305

2. LOSS PER KILOGRAM OF METHYL BROMIDE 

(US$) $ 0 $ 55.85 $ 77.09

3. LOSS AS A PERCENTAGE OF GROSS REVENUE 

(%) 0% 36% 50%

4. LOSS AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET OPERATING 

REVENUE (%) 0% 118% 163%

5. OPERATING PROFIT MARGIN (%) 30% -6% -21%

**Note that the measures in the tables below must be interpreted carefully. Operating costs do not include fixed 

costs and net revenue equals gross revenue minus operating costs. Production numbers with iodomethane and the 

lower use rates in California are still pending.

8. RESULTANT CHANGES TO REQUESTED EXEMPTION QUANTITIES

TABLE 3: NOMINATION AMOUNT (2013)

 California

Strawberry 

Nursery Assoc. 

 Sector Total / 

Average

Quantity Requested for 2012: Amount (kgs) 4,690 4,690

Quantity Recommended by 

MBTOC/TEAP for 2012 :

Amount (kgs) 3,752 3,752

Amount (kgs) 3,752 3,752

Area (ha) 23 23

Rate 160 160

Transition from 2012 Baseline 

Adjusted Value

Percentage

(%)

0% 0%

Amount (kgs)

 3,752 3,752

Area (ha) 19 19

Rate 200 200

SECTOR

Quantity Approved by Parties 

for 2012:

Quantity Required for

2013 Nomination:

STRAWBERRY NURSERY
USA CUN13 SOIL Strawberry Nursery Open Field -CA

Page 8 of 8

CITATIONS

CDFA (California Department of Food and Agriculture). 2009. 

http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/phpps/PE/Nursery/NIPM.html

Regulation for nursery and seed inspection (NIPM #3), 

http://www.cdfa.ca.gov//phpps/PE/Nursery/pdfs/nipm_3_regs_nsy_sees_insp.pdf;

Approved treatment and handling procedures to ensure against nematode pest infestation of 

nursery stock (NIPM #7), http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/phpps/PE/Nursery/pdfs/NIPM_7.pdf ; 

CDFA Strawberry Registration and Certification Program, 

http://fpms.ucdavis.edu/Strawberry/CDFAStrawRegs.html

Fennimore, S. A., Haar, M. J., Goodhue, R. E., and Winterbottom, C. Q. 2008a. Weed control in 

strawberry runner plant nurseries with methyl bromide alternative fumigants. HortScience 

43(5):1495-1500.

Fennimore, S. A., Duniway, J. M., Browne, G. T., Martin, F. N., Ajwa, H. A., Westerdahl, B.B., 

Goodhue, R. E., Haar, M., and Winterbottom, C. 2008b. Methyl bromide alternatives 

evaluated for California strawberry nurseries. California Agriculture 62(2):62-67. 

http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3194&context=anrcs/californiaagric

ulture

Garcia-Mendez, E., De Cal, A., Melgarejo, P., Salto, T., Martinez-Beringola, M. L., Redondo, 

C., Martinez-Treceno, A., Becerril, M., Andrade, M. A., Medina, J. J., Soria, C., LopezAranda, J. M., and Garcia-Sinovas, D. 2007. Strawberry nurseries in Spain: alternatives to 

methyl bromide, 2006 results. Annual International Research Conference on Methyl 

Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions (2007). 

http://www.mbao.org/2007/Proceedings/063LopezArandaJSpainExperimentsNursery2006.pdf

Kabir, Z., Fennimore, S. A., Duniway, J. M., Martin, F. N., Browne, G. T., Winterbottom, C. Q., 

Ajwa, H. A., Westerdahl, B. B., Goodhue, R. E., and Haar, M. J. 2005. Alternatives to 

methyl bromide for strawberry runner plant production. HortScience 40(6):1709-1715.

Larson, K. D., and Shaw, D.V. 2007. Strawberry nursery soil fumigation and runner transplant 

fruit production. 2007 Annual International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide 

Alternatives and Emissions Reductions. 

http://www.mbao.org/2007/Proceedings/072LarsonKStrawberrynurserysoilfumigation.pdf

Larson, K. D., and Shaw, D.V. 2000. Soil Fumigation and Runner Plant Production: A Synthesis 

of 4 Yrs of Strawberry Nursery Field Trials. HortSci 35(4):642-646.