alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Carl B. Webb, President and Chief Executive Officer of Triad Financial Corporation, certifythat:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Triad Financial Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c. Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the company’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thecompany’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.              /s/ Carl B. Webb   Carl B. Webb   President and Chief Executive Officer   Dated: November 13, 2006
§ 190.01-90 Vessels contracted for prior to March 1, 1968. ( a ) Existing structure previously approved will be considered satisfactory so long as it is maintained in good condition to the satisfaction of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection. Minor repairs and alterations may be made to the same standards as the original construction.
( b ) Conversions, major alterations, new installations, and replacements, shall meet the applicable specifications in this subpart for new vessels.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 20350)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; National Children's Study—West Coast Review.                    

*Date:*                         May 19-21, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         2 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         Hilton Washington DC/Rockville (Prev Double Tree), 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Hameed Khan, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6902,                         *khanh@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: April 18, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2026  Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
##### 



(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
for the period covered by this Report.
 Dated: November 13, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Mark S. AllioMark S. AllioChairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive OfficerDated:  November 13, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Therese Ann LiutkusTherese Ann Liutkus, CPATreasurer and Chief Financial Officer
 32.
Case 2:13-cr-20913-PDB-DRG ECF No. 79 filed 04/20/16 PageID.480 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:13-cr-20913-PDB-DRG ECF No. 79 filed 04/20/16 PageID.481 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:13-cr-20913-PDB-DRG ECF No. 79 filed 04/20/16 PageID.482 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:13-cr-20913-PDB-DRG ECF No. 79 filed 04/20/16 PageID.483 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:13-cr-20913-PDB-DRG ECF No. 79 filed 04/20/16 PageID.484 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:13-cr-20913-PDB-DRG ECF No. 79 filed 04/20/16 PageID.485 Page 6 of 6
# C_2011186EN.01003302.xml

| 25.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/33

---

Action brought on 20 April 2011 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-27/11)

2011/C 186/61

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Levi, M. Vandenbussche and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decisions of the defendant refusing to authorise medical benefits requested by the applicant for his son, his wife and himself.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the contested decisions and, as necessary, the decision of the AECE rejecting the complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decisions and, as necessary, the decision of the AECE rejecting the complaint;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
_______________________________________ __ 

# Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan



### October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 128744 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly 

### JOHN H. DETAR, Plaintiff, Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,



### v SC: 128744 Justices



### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant. AGC: 3465/04

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e complaint for superintendi ng control is considered. Relief is DENIED, because the Court is not p ersuaded that it should grant the requested relief.

s1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the financial statements of Globe Manufacturing Corp. for the six months ended
June 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                        4,320
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                33,825
<ALLOWANCES>                                  5,442
<INVENTORY>                                  14,655
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             50,438
<PP&E>                                      170,689
<DEPRECIATION>                               87,749
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              141,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       305,948
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          1
<OTHER-SE>                                (170,210)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                141,897
<SALES>                                      73,274
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             73,274
<CGS>                                        52,414
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                71,994
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                182
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           15,102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (14,004)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (1,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                               (13,004)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0


</TABLE>
January 26, 2015

Mr. Paul Gretch

Director, Office of International Aviation

United States Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: American Airlines’ Application for an Exemption 

(Miami, Florida – Monterrey, Mexico)

(Docket DOT-OST-2015-0008)

Dear Mr. Gretch:

We have polled the air carriers on the attached service list regarding 

American Airlines’ Application for an Exemption (MIA-MTY). We received no 

objections.

Accordingly, we respectfully request expedited allocation of the Exemption 

requested in the Application.

Sincerely, 

Howard Kass

Vice President – Regulatory Affairs

Robert A. Wirick,

Managing Director, Regulatory and 

International Affairs

Abigail Donovan

Director, Congressional and Federal Affairs

1101 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20036 (202) 326-5153 Fax: (202) 898-4810
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that, on January 26, 2015, I caused to be served a copy of the 

foregoing Letter by email upon those addressees listed below:

englets@state.gov (Department of State)

cristinasa@state.gov (Department of State)

brian.hedberg@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

todd.homan@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

peter.irvine@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

laura.remo@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

brett.kruger@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

john.allen@faa.gov (Federal Aviation Administration)

dan.weiss@united.com (United)

steve.morrissey@united.com (United)

gmurphy@crowell.com (Counsel for United)

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com (Delta)

jhill@cooley.com (Counsel for JetBlue and Hawaiian)

perkmann@cooley.com (Counsel for JetBlue and Hawaiian)

jeremy.ross@alaskaair.com (Alaska)

dheffernan@cozen.com (Counsel for Alaska)

jyoung@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit)

dkirstein@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit)

bob.kneisley@wnco.com (Southwest)

leslie.abbott@wnco.com (Southwest)

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com (Sun Country)

thomas.ting@suncountry.com (Sun Country)

matwood@cozen.com (Counsel for Frontier)

stephen.lachter@lachterlaw.com (Counsel for Frontier)

rpommer@atlasair.com (Atlas)

anita.mosner@hklaw.com (Counsel for UPS)

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com (Counsel for UPS)

barbara.russell@virginamerica.com (Virgin America)

john.varley@virginamerica.com (Virgin America)

______________________

Abigail Donovan
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 63 (Tuesday, April 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 15934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1630]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Secretary


List of Countries Requiring Cooperation With an International 
Boycott

    In order to comply with the mandate of section 999(a)(3) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is 
publishing a current list of countries which require or may require 
participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within 
the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).
    On the basis of the best information currently available to the 
Department of the Treasury, the following countries require or may 
require participation in, or cooperation with, and international 
boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986).

Kuwait
Lebanon
Libya
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Syria
United Arab Emirates
Yemen, Republic of

    Iraq is not included in this list, but its status with respect to 
future lists remains under review by the Department of the Treasury.

    Dated: March 28, 2007.
John L. Harrington,
Acting International Tax Counsel (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 07-1630 Filed 4-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Subcommittee G—Education, June 26, 2007, 8 a.m. to June 27, 2007, 5 p.m., Gaithersburg Marriott Washingtonian Center, 204 Boardwalk Place, Gaithersburg, MD 20878 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 16, 2007, 72FR19006.                

The meeting has been rescheduled to a one day meeting that will occur on June 26, 2007. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: April 23, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-2131  Filed 4-30-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C_2014253EN.01000701.xml

| 4.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 June 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Fermo — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against M

(Case C-398/12) (1)

1

((Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement - Article 54 - ‘Ne bis in idem’ principle - Scope - Order made by a court of a Contracting State finding that there is no ground to refer a case to a trial court because of insufficient evidence - Possibility of reopening the criminal investigation in the case where new facts and/or evidence come to light - Concept of person whose trial has been ‘finally disposed of’ - Criminal prosecution in another Contracting State of the same person in respect of the same acts - Preclusion of further prosecution and application of the ne bis in idem principle))

2014/C 253/09

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Fermo

Party in the criminal proceedings in the main action

Party in the criminal proceedings in the main action

M

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale di Fermo — Interpretation of Article 54 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement — ‘Ne bis in idem’ principle — Concept of ‘person whose trial has been finally disposed of’ — Final decision of no case to answer made by a court of a Member State

Ne bis in idem

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 54 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders, signed in Schengen (Luxembourg) on 19 June 1990, must be interpreted as meaning that an order making a finding that there is no ground to refer a case to a trial court which precludes, in the Contracting State in which that order was made, the bringing of new criminal proceedings in respect of the same acts against the person to whom that finding applies, unless new facts and/or evidence against that person come to light, must be considered to be a final judgment, for the purposes of that article, precluding new proceedings against the same person in respect of the same acts in another Contracting State.

---

(1)  OJ C 355, 17.11.2012.

1

---
# C_2016027EN.01007501.xml

| 25.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/75 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/75

---

Order of the General Court of 25 November 2015 — Missir Mamachi di Lusignano and Others v Commission

(Case T-494/11) (1)

1

(2016/C 027/94)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  C 331, 12.11.2011.

1

---
#### Tamer M. Duel, *Respondent, v.*Albert M. White and Charilla R. White, his *wife, Appellants, Impleaded, etc*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Boardman, J.
§ 170.120 Stability letter. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each vessel must have a stability letter issued by the Coast Guard before the vessel is placed into service. This letter sets forth conditions of operation.
( b ) A stability letter is not required if the information can be placed on the Certificate of Inspection or the Load Line Certificate.
[CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51010, Nov. 4, 1983, as amended by CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51217, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2007-0030, 75 FR 78084, Dec. 14, 2010]
EXHIBIT 10.24




---



##### 



Very truly yours,
TRIAD FINANCIAL CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Carl WebbName:Title: TRIAD FINANCIAL WAREHOUSE SPECIAL
PURPOSE LLCBy:
    /s/ Carl WebbName:Title: 2




---



##### 



TRIAD AUTOMOBILE RECEIVABLES WAREHOUSE TRUSTBy:
    /s/ Carl WebbName:Title: Agreed and Accepted:
CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS REALTY CORP.By:Name:Title: 3




---



##### 








---



##### 



Notice of Warehouse Borrowing
  
  Agreement
          5




---



##### 



Very truly yours,
Triad Automobile Receivables Warehouse Trust,
BorrowerBy:Name:Title:
    1 
 1
    
    To be signed by Owner Trustee or a Responsible Officer
of Administrator. 6
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Advisory Committee on CARES Business Plan Studies has scheduled a meeting on February 9, 2007, at VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Livermore Division, Building 90, NHCU Dining Room, 4951 Arroyo Road, Livermore, CA. The meeting will convene at 9 a.m. and conclude at 4:30 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on proposed business plans at those VA facility sites identified in May 2004 as requiring further study by the Capital Asset Realignment for Enhanced Services (CARES) Decision document.

The objective of the meeting is to provide the Secretary with advice regarding the final selection of a business planning option from those previously selected by the Secretary for further study. An analysis of the business planning options completed by the VA contractor is to be presented prior to their submission to the VA. The agenda will also accommodate public commentary on the options.

                    Interested persons may attend and present oral or written statements to the Committee. For additional information regarding the meeting, please contact Mr. Jay Halpern, Designated Federal Officer, (00CARES), at 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, by phone at (202) 273-5994, or by e-mail at                     *jay.halpern@hq.med.va.gov.*

Dated: January 10, 2007.

By Direction of the Secretary.

E. Philip Riggin,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-183 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M