alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0001007020
<NAME> INTEGRATED SYSTEMS CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           9,517
<SECURITIES>                                       391
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,101
<ALLOWANCES>                                       194
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,754
<PP&E>                                           3,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,210
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,401
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,937
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,390
<SALES>                                         22,047
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,047
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,306
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,954
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,701
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,253
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,253
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30


</TABLE>
# C_2011347EN.01001501.xml

| 26.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/15

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from Tribunalul Argeș (Romania) lodged on 20 September 2011 — Mariana Budan v Romanian State — Ministerul Finanțelor Publice represented by the Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Argeș

(Case C-484/11)

2011/C 347/22

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunalul Argeș

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Mariana Budan

Applicant:

Defendant: Romanian State — Ministerul Finanțelor Publice (Ministry for Public Finance) represented by the Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice (Directorate General for Public Finance), Argeș

Defendant:

Intervener: Iulian-Nicolae Cujbescu

Intervener:

Question referred

Question referred

In the interpretation given by the Court of Justice of the European Union of the fundamental principles laid down by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and by the Treaties of the European Union — and in the absence of any domestic legislation (as result of the declaration that Article 5 of Law No 221/[2009] is unconstitutional) — are the applicant, Mariana Budan, ... and the intervener, Iulian-Nicolae Cujbescu ... entitled to compensation for non-material damage as victims of the Communist regime and now citizens of the European Union?

---
§ 182.425 Engine exhaust cooling. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, all engine exhaust pipes must be water cooled. ( 1 ) Vertical dry exhaust pipes are permissible if installed in compliance with §§ 177.405(b) and 177.970 of this chapter.
( 2 ) Horizontal dry exhaust pipes are permitted only if: ( i ) They do not pass through living or berthing spaces;
( ii ) They terminate above the deepest load waterline;
( iii ) They are so arranged as to prevent entry of cold water from rough or boarding seas;
( iv ) They are constructed of corrosion resisting material at the hull penetration; and
( v ) They are installed in compliance with §§ 177.405(b) and 177.970 of this chapter.
( b ) The exhaust pipe cooling water system must comply with the requirements of this paragraph. ( 1 ) Water for cooling the exhaust pipe must be obtained from the engine cooling water system or a separate engine driven pump.
( 2 ) Water for cooling the exhaust pipe, other than a vertical exhaust, must be injected into the exhaust system as near to the engine manifold as practicable. The water must pass through the entire length of the exhaust pipe.
( 3 ) The part of the exhaust system between the point of cooling water injection and the engine manifold must be water-jacketed or effectively insulated and protected in compliance with §§ 177.405(b) and 177.970 of this chapter.
( 4 ) Vertical exhaust pipes must be water-jacketed or suitably insulated as required by § 182.430(g).
( 5 ) When the exhaust cooling water system is separate from the engine cooling water system, a suitable warning device, visual or audible, must be installed at the operating station to indicate any reduction in normal water flow in the exhaust cooling system.
( 6 ) A suitable hull strainer must be installed in the circulating raw water intake line for the exhaust cooling system.
( c ) Engine exhaust cooling system built in accordance with the requirements of ABYC P-1 (incorporated by reference; see 46 CFR 175.600) will be considered as meeting the requirements of this section.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 986, Jan. 10, 1996; 61 FR 20557, May 7, 1996, as amended by USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65207, Oct. 31, 2008]
#### § 111.40-1 Panelboard standard.

Each panelboard must meet Section 9.10.1 of IEEE 45.1-2017 (incorporated by reference; see § 110.10-1 of this subchapter).

[USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16362, Mar. 16, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
PCD INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                          23,732
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,492
<ALLOWANCES>                                       242
<INVENTORY>                                      3,098
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,132
<PP&E>                                          11,332
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,553
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,246
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,327
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,246
<SALES>                                         21,527
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,527
<CGS>                                           11,140
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,140
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,279
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,934
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,562
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,372
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,372
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66
        

</TABLE>
§ 196.15-10 Sanitation. ( a ) It shall be the duty of the master and chief engineer to see that the vessel, and, in particular, the quarters are in a clean and sanitary condition. The chief engineer shall be responsible only for the sanitary condition of the engineering department.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - [Docket No. FAA-2007-23639]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The FAA is issuing a correction to the Notice published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on March 7, 2007 (72 FR 10292), Subject: Deadline for Notification to Use the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Sponsor, Cargo, and Nonprimary Entitlement Funds for FY 2006. That Notice announced May 1, 2007, as the deadline for each airport sponsor to notify the FAA that it will use its fiscal year 2007 entitlement funds to accomplish projects identified in the Airports Capital Improvement Plan that was formulated in the spring of 2006. This correction changes the fiscal year referenced in the subject from “2006” to “2007”.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Kendall Ball (                        *Kendall.Ball@faa.gov*), Airports Financial Assistance Division (APP-500), Office of Airport Planning                               ( print page 13551)                            and Programming, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, (202) 267-7436).                    

## Correction

In FR Doc. No. FAA-2007-23639 published on March 7, 2007 (72 FR 10292) make the following correction:

On Page 10292, in the subject correct “Fiscal Year 2006” to read “Fiscal Year 2007”.

Barry L. Molar,

Manager, Airports Financial Assistance Division.

[FR Doc. 07-1391 Filed 3-21-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
### U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

LOG OF MEETING

SUBJECT: Meeting of ASTM F15. 21 Sling Carrier Subcommittee

DATE OF MEETING: 17 December 2014

LOG ENTRY SOURCE: Hope E.J. Nesteruk, ESHF

DATE OF LOG ENTRY: 31 December 2014

LOCATION: Rockville, MD (phone)

CPSC ATTENDEE(S): Hope Nesteruk, Tim Smith, Ma x Sanborn , Barbara

Little

NON

- CPSC ATTENDEE(S): Rochelle Price, Sling Rings; Lisa Trofe, JPMA; Cory Campbell, DECA, Inc. ; Susan Gmeiner, Maya Wrap; Sean Oberle

, Product Safety Letter.

SUMMARY OF MEETING:

The meeting was called to discuss options for mod ifying the test torso that is specified in F2907. The task group discussed the “BOB” torso that is used in the F2236 versus specifying the exterior surface of the torso currently used in F2907. After discussions, the task group arrived at covering the ex isting torso with fabric, such as the fabric specified in to close test crash test dummies in FMVSS 213.
*********************************************
Household Finance Corporation
Household Consumer Loan Corporation
Household Consumer Loan Trust 1996-1
*********************************************
                                                         
Sum of 1/15/97 - 12/15/97
                                                                  
         
Distribution Dates

Ending Pool Principal Balance                              
3,965,949,127.56
Series 1996-1 Participation Invested Amount                  
568,703,793.21
Seller Amount                                                 
59,902,453.90
Remittances on the Participation                             
189,701,007.25
Optimum Monthly Principal                                    
144,613,373.92
Accelerated Principal Payment                                  
1,612,468.75
Ending Class A Note Security Balance                         
364,025,087.98
Ending Class B Note Security Balance                         
136,244,640.00
Ending Certificate Security Balance                           
25,455,360.00
Ending Overcollateralization Amount                           
42,978,705.24
Ending Class A Adjusted Balance                              
364,025,087.98
Ending Class B Adjusted Balance                              
136,244,640.00
Ending Certficate  Adjusted Balance                           
25,455,360.00
Ending Overcollateralization Amount                           
42,978,705.24
Class A Interest Paid                                         
25,980,282.99
Class B Interest Paid                                          
8,555,138.57
Certificate Yield Paid                                         
1,701,357.92
Class A Unpaid Interest                                           
     0.00
Class B Unpaid Interest                                           
     0.00
Cetificate Unpaid Yield                                           
     0.00
Class A Principal Paid                                       
146,225,842.66
Class B Principal Paid                                            
     0.00   
Certificate  Principal Paid                                       
     0.00
OC Principal Paid                                                 
     0.00
Total Charge-Offs:                                                
     0.00
Interest paid per $1,000 Class A                                  
    40.70
Principal paid per $1,000 Class A                                 
   229.05
Interest paid per $1,000 Class B                                  
    62.79
Interest paid per $1,000 Class B                                  
     0.00
Yield Paid per $1000 Certificate                                  
    66.84
Principal Paid per $1000 Certificate                              
     0.00
# C_2013304EN.01001602.xml

| 19.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2013 — Globula v Commission

(Case T-465/11) (1)

1

(Internal market in natural gas - Directive 2003/55/EC - Obligation on natural gas undertakings to organise a system of negotiated third party access to gas storage facilities - Decision of the Czech authorities granting the applicant a temporary exemption for its future underground gas storage facilities in Dambořice - Commission decision ordering the Czech Republic to withdraw the exemption decision - Time at which Directive 2003/55 takes effect)

2013/C 304/27

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Globula a.s. (Hodonín, Czech Republic) (represented by: M. Petite, D. Paemen, A. Tomtsis, D. Koláček and P. Zákoucký, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet and T. Scharf, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicants: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, J. Očková and T. Müller, Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicants:

Re:

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2011) 4509 of 27 June 2011 on the exemption of an Underground Gas Storage Facility in Dambořice from the internal market rules on third party access.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Decision C(2011) 4509 of the Commission of 27 June 2011 on the exemption of an Underground Gas Storage Facility in Dambořice from the internal market rules on third party access; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Decision C(2011) 4509 of the Commission of 27 June 2011 on the exemption of an Underground Gas Storage Facility in Dambořice from the internal market rules on third party access;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Globula a.s.; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Globula a.s.;

| 3. | Orders the Czech Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Czech Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 305, 15.10.2011.

1

---
#### WILLIAM S. VOORHEES, PLAINTIFF, v. BOICE RUNYON COMPANY, DEFENDANT.

Decided May *4,*1929.

Before Gummere, Chief Justice, and Justice Parker.

Eor the rule, *Charles Jones.*

*Contra, Farncis A. Gordon*and *David T. Wilentz.*

Per Curiam.

This action was brought to recover compensation for personal injuries. The plaintiff visited the lumber-yard of the defendant for the purpose of purchasing a board of a particular size and material. He was taken charge of by an employe of the defendant and shown to a bin in which such lumber was stored. The bin was part of a wooden shed, and the defendant’s servant called the attention of the plaintiff to a particular board in the pile that was there stored. The plaintiff was doubtful whether this board was just what he wanted, being uncertain as to its size, and he was then furnished with a rule by the defendant’s employe by which to measure this particular board. In order to reach it, the plaintiff walked across a flooring, or plank, in the bin, which broke after he had taken two or three steps, causing him tp fall. As the result of his fall he received the injuries for which he now seeks compensation. The trial terminated in jis favor, the jury awarding him $10,500.

*461The first contention, on behalf of the defendant is that the present rule should be made absolute because the trial court erroneously refused to nonsuit the plaintiff, and also denied a motion to direct a verdict in the defendant’s favor. Our examination of the evidence satisfies us that the refusal of each of these motions was proper.

It is further contended on behalf of the defendant that the finding by the jury that the accident was the result of negligence on the part of the defendant, and that the plaintiff did not contribute thereto by his own negligence, is contrary to the clear weight of the evidence. We cannot concur in this view.

It is further argued that the court erroneously refused to charge the jury certain requests submitted by the defendant. Our consideration of these requests leads us to the conclusion that the refusal of the court'to charge them as submitted was proper.

Lastly, it is contended that the verdict is excessive. An examination of the proofs bearing upon the character of the plaintiff’s injuries satisfies us that this contention is well founded.

If the plaintiff will consent to a reduction of the .verdict to $7,000, he may enter judgment for that amount; otherwise the rule to show cause will be made absolute.
§ 169.309 Structural standards. ( a ) Compliance with the standards established by a recognized classification society will, in general, be considered satisfactory evidence of the structural adequacy of a vessel.
( b ) Masts, posts and other supporting structures are to have adequate strength to withstand the highest loadings imposed by the sail systems during all normal and emergency conditions. Particular attention must be given to the integration of the masts and rigging into the hull structure. The hull structure must be adequately reinforced and stiffened locally to ensure sufficient strength and resistance to plate buckling.
( c ) The design, materials, and construction of masts, yards, booms, bowsprits, and standing rigging must be suitable for the intended service. Detailed calculations with respect to the strength of the sail system may be required. Approval by a recognized classification society may be considered satisfactory evidence of the adequacy of the sail system.
( d ) When scantlings differ from established standards and it can be demonstrated that a craft approximating the same size, power and displacement has been built to the proposed scantlings and has been in satisfactory service, insofar as structural adequacy is concerned, for a period of a least 5 years, the proposed scantling may be approved. A detailed structural analysis may be required.
( e ) Special consideration will be given to the structural requirements of vessels not contemplated by the standards of a recognized classification society and to the use of materials not specially included in these standards.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MICHAEL MILES,

Case No. 15-11042

Plaintiff, Hon. John Corbett O’Meara

v.

MOURAD RESTAURANTS INC.,

Defendant.

_______________________________________/

JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment is entered pursuant to the consent

decree and order dated September 24, 2015.

Date: September 24, 2015

DAVID WEAVER

Clerk, U.S. District Court

By: s/William Barkholz

Deputy Clerk

Approved:

s/John Corbett O'Meara

United States District Judge

Case 5:15-cv-11042-JCO-RSW ECF No. 14 filed 09/24/15 PageID.72 Page 1 of 1
§ 169.537 Description of equipment for lifefloats. ( a ) *Boathook.* Each boathook must be of the single hook ball point type. Boathook handles must be of clear grained white ash, or equivalent, not less than 6 feet long and 11 ⁄ 2 inches in diameter.
( b ) *Lifeline and pendants.* The lifeline and pendants must be as furnished by the manufacturer with approved life floats. Replacement lifelines and pendants must meet the requirements in subpart 160.010 of this chapter.
( c ) *Paddles.* Paddles must be not less than 5 feet long.
( d ) *Painter.* The painter must— ( 1 ) Be at least 30m (100 ft.) long, but not less than 3 times the distance between the deck on which the life float(s) are stowed and the light draft of the vessel,
( 2 ) Have a breaking strength of at least 6.7 KN (1500 lbs.), except that if the capacity of the life float is 50 persons or more, the breaking strength must be at least 13.4 KN (3000 lbs.),
( 3 ) Be of a dark color, if synthetic, or of a type certified to be resistant to deterioration from ultraviolet light, and
( 4 ) Be stowed in such a way it runs freely when the life float floats away from the sinking vessel.
( e ) *Water light.* The water light must be approved under subpart 161.010 of this chapter. The water light must be attached to the lifefloat by a 12-thread manila or equivalent synthetic lanyard 3 fathoms in length.
#### Mary N. Johnson, *as sole Executrix, etc., Respondent, v.*John I. Lawrence and others, *Appellants.*

Part of judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.