alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                        ICY SPLASH FOOD & BEVERAGE, INC.
    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Icy Splash Food & Beverage, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Charles Tokarz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Icy Splash Food & Beverage, Inc. and will be retained by Icy Splash
Food & Beverage, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

Date:  November 22, 2004

 /s/ Charles Tokarz
Charles Tokarz
Chief Financial Officer
Base Salaries and Annual Incentive Plan


 EXHIBIT 10.3 
  
 BASE SALARIES AND ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN TARGETS 
 FOR CERTAIN EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 
  

										
	 Executive Officer

	  	New Base Salary*

	  	Percentage Increase from 2004

	 	 	 2005 Annual Incentive
 Plan Target Percentage**

	 
	 W. Matt Ralls
Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial
Officer
	  	$	420,000	  	5.0	%	 	65	%
	 James L. McCulloch
Senior Vice President
and General Counsel
	  	$	340,000	  	4.6	%	 	65	%
	 Marion M. Woolie
Senior Vice President,
Operations
	  	$	335,000	  	4.7	%	 	65	%
	 Roger B. Hunt
Senior Vice President,
Marketing
	  	$	315,000	  	5.0	%	 	60	%



	*	These base salaries do not go into effect until April 1, 2005. 


	**	Expressed as a percentage of annual base salary.
# C_2020433EN.01004101.xml

| 14.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 433/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 433/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2020 — France and IFP Énergies nouvelles v Commission

(Joined Cases T-479/11 RENV and T-157/12 RENV) (1)

(State aid - Oil exploration - State aid scheme implemented by France - Implied and unlimited guarantee conferred by IFPEN by the grant of the status of EPIC - Advantage - Presumption of the existence of an advantage - Proportionality)

(2020/C 433/50)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant in Case T-479/11 RENV: French Republic (represented by: P. Dodeller, acting as Agent)

Applicant in Case T-157/12 RENV: IFP Énergies nouvelles (Rueil-Malmaison, France) (represented by: E. Lagathu and É. Barbier de La Serre, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and D. Grespan, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision of 29 June 2011 on State aid granted by France to the Institut Français du Pétrole (Case C 35/08 (ex NN 11/08)) (OJ 2012 L 14, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Article 5(3) and (4) and Article 6(1) in so far as it concerns the maximum impact of the State guarantee as estimated in Article 5(3) and (4) of Commission Decision 2012/26/EU of 29 June 2011 on State aid granted by France to the Institut Français du Pétrole (Case C 35/08 (ex NN 11/08); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 5(3) and (4) and Article 6(1) in so far as it concerns the maximum impact of the State guarantee as estimated in Article 5(3) and (4) of Commission Decision 2012/26/EU of 29 June 2011 on State aid granted by France to the Institut Français du Pétrole (Case C 35/08 (ex NN 11/08);

| 2. | Dismisses the actions as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the actions as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission, the French Republic and IFP Énergies nouvelles each to bear their own costs in Cases T-479/11 and T-157/12; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission, the French Republic and IFP Énergies nouvelles each to bear their own costs in Cases T-479/11 and T-157/12;

| 4. | Orders the French Republic, IFP Énergies nouvelles and the Commission each to bear their own costs in Case C-438/16 P; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the French Republic, IFP Énergies nouvelles and the Commission each to bear their own costs in Case C-438/16 P;

| 5. | Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission in Case T-479/11 RENV; |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission in Case T-479/11 RENV;

| 6. | Orders IFP Énergies nouvelles and the Commission each to bear their own costs in Case T-157/12 RENV. |
| --- | --- |

6.

Orders IFP Énergies nouvelles and the Commission each to bear their own costs in Case T-157/12 RENV.

---

(1)  OJ C 340, 19.11.2011.

---
#### § 197.400 Applicability.

Diving operations may only be conducted from a vessel or facility subject to the subpart if the regulations in this subpart are met.
#### § 294.29 Billing procedures.

All Agreement Holders must submit a voucher to the Maritime Administration for payment. For Agreement Holders operating under more than one TSP Operating Agreement, the Agreement Holder may submit a single monthly voucher applicable to all its TSP Operating Agreements. Each voucher submission must include a certification that the vessel(s) for which payment is requested were operated in accordance with § 294.23(a) and applicable TSP Operating Agreements. All submissions must be forwarded to the Tanker Security Program, Maritime Administration, via email to *sealiftsupport@dot.gov.* Payments will be paid and processed under the terms and conditions of the Prompt Payment Act, 31 U.S.C. 3901, *et seq.*
Exhibit 32.2



Certification

Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James T. Riffe, Executive Vice President and Cashier of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ James T. Riffe

James T. Riffe

Executive Vice President and Cashier

March 31, 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

MATTHEW LEON VAUGHN,

Defendant-Petitioner.

 /

Case No. 15-20134

Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED 

IN FORMA PAUPERIS [46]

This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner Matthew Leon Vaughn's application

to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. (Dkt. # 46). As noted in the Court's July 25, 2018

Order, the Court declined to issue a certificate of appealability because the arguments

raised in Petitioner's Section 2255 motion are without merit and because Petitioner failed

to make a substantial showing that his constitutional rights were compromised. (Dkt. # 43,

Pg ID 294). The Court finds that any appeal of the July 25, 2018 Order and Judgment

would be frivolous and would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3);

Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962); McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d

601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997) (overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199

(2007)). The Court therefore DENIES Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis

on appeal.

For the reasons set forth above,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner Matthew Leon Vaughn's application to proceed in

forma pauperis (Dkt. # 46) is DENIED. 
SO ORDERED.

S/Nancy G. Edmunds 

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge

Dated: August 27, 2018

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of

record on August 27, 2018, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Lisa Bartlett

Case Manager

2
ACCEPTED 11-17-00094-cv ELEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS 6/1/2017 2:56:08 PM SHERRY WILLIAMSON

CLERK
#### § 188.01-1 Purpose of regulations.

The purpose of the regulations in this subchapter is to set forth uniform minimum requirements for oceanographic research vessels designated in accordance with § 3.10-1 of this title and subject to Coast Guard inspection requirements. The regulations are necessary to carry out the provisions of applicable laws governing inspection and certification of oceanographic research vessels and have the force of law.

[CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51219, Sept. 30, 1997]
2:14-cv-14636-SJM-RSW Doc # 4-2 Filed 12/08/14 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 27
2:14-cv-14636-SJM-RSW Doc # 4-2 Filed 12/08/14 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 28
2:14-cv-14636-SJM-RSW Doc # 4-2 Filed 12/08/14 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 29
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHARLES EDKINS,

Plaintiff, No. 15-10615

v. District Judge Matthew F. Leitman

Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER

On February 18, 2015, Plaintiff Charles Edkins filed a pro se civil complaint under

the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b). Before the Court is his Plaintiff’s

September 23, 2015 renewed motion to appoint counsel and for an extension of time to

respond to Defendant Scott Kevin Dubois’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. #25]. 

As noted in my earlier order, it is the practice of this Court to defer any attempt to

obtain counsel for pro se civil Plaintiffs until after motions to dismiss or motions for

summary judgment have been denied. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is

currently pending. Docket #22. Therefore, at this stage of the proceedings, Plaintiff’s

request for counsel is premature.

Plaintiff also requests an extension of 120 days to respond to Defendant Scott Kevin

Dubois’ September 4, 2015 motion for summary judgment. The Court acknowledges that 1

Plaintiff’s inexperience in legal matters justifies an extension but finds that a 120-day

1

Plaintiff asks for the 120-day extension to respond Docket nos. 21 and 22. However, Docket

#21 is a stipulation to the dismissal by another Defendant. Plaintiff need not respond to

Docket #21. 

-1-

2:15-cv-10615-MFL-RSW Doc # 27 Filed 09/30/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 224
extension is unwarranted. Plaintiff is therefore granted an additional 45-day extension to

respond to Defendant’s motion. 

Plaintiff’s renewed motion to appoint counsel is DENIED without prejudice. His

motion for an extension of time to respond to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is

GRANTED in part. Plaintiff is hereby ordered to respond by December 11, 2015. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/R. Steven Whalen 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dated: September 30, 2015

Certificate of Service

I certify that a copy of this document was served upon parties of record on

September 30, 2015 via electronic or postal mail. 

/s/C. Ciesla 

CASE MANAGER

-2-

2:15-cv-10615-MFL-RSW Doc # 27 Filed 09/30/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 225
| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of and for the period covered by the                Report. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date:                August 13, 2007  |  /s/                Gilbert J. Pomar, III             |
|--------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                             |  Gilbert J. Pomar, III                                |
|                                             |  President and Chief Executive                Officer |

|  Date:                August 13, 2007 |  /s/                Valerie A. Kendall      |
|--------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                                       |  Valerie A. Kendall                         |
|                                       |  Executive Vice President                   |
|                                       |  and Chief Financial                Officer |
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C SECTION 1350) The undersigned, as the Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Matria Healthcare,
Inc., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2004, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained
in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Matria Healthcare, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The
foregoing certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. Section 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. This 14th day of March 2005. /s/ Stephen M. MengertStephen M. MengertVice-President, Finance andChief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to Matria Healthcare, Inc. and will be retained by Matria Healthcare, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information in this Exhibit 32.2 shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference
in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific
reference in such filing.
# C_2011282EN.01002303.xml

| 24.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/23

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 29 July 2011 — Holcim (Deutschland) and Holcim v Commission

(Case T-293/11 R)

(Interim relief - Competition - Request for information - Article 18(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Application for stay of execution - Lack of urgency)

2011/C 282/49

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Holcim AG (Hamburg, Germany) and Holcim Ltd (Rapperswil-Jona, Switzerland) (represented by: P. Niggemann and K. Gaßner, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Kellerbauer, R. Sauer and C. Hödlmayr, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for a stay of execution of Commission Decision C(2011) 2363 final of 30 March 2011 concerning a proceeding pursuant to Article 18(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (Case COMP/39.520 — Cement and related products)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim relief is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim relief is rejected.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period
ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, George L. Ball, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ GEORGE L. BALLGeorge
      L. BallChief
      Executive Officer




February
18, 2010





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sanders Morris Harris
Group Inc. and will be retained by Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 32

ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Electronic Data Systems Corporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), Michael H. Jordan, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert H. Swan, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ MICHAEL H. JORDAN                                 
|Michael H. Jordan Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
|March 8, 2006                                         
|                                                      
|/S/ ROBERT H. SWAN                                    
|Robert H. Swan                                        
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  
|March 8, 2006                                         

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending December 17, 2005

|Filer                       | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                             
|--------------------------- | ------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------
|NEW RICHMOND BANCORPORATION | CIC           | Interagency Notice of Change in Bank Control filed by Mr. Jay L. Dunlap, Lincoln, NB acting as attorney and agent on behalf of Mark Dunlap to vote 58.25 shares or 55.48% of the outstanding voting shares of New Richmond Bancorporation, New Richmond, OH. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:12/23/2005
|Newspaper:                  | Not available
|Federal Register:           | 12/23/2005   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                 | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|-------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|COMMERCIAL & SVG BK, MILLERSBURG, OHIO | 189129  | 06/20/2005 | 10/26/2005     | S         | Large Bank 
|CROGHAN COLONIAL BK, FREMONT, OHIO     | 362717  | 03/07/2005 | 06/06/2005     | O         | Large Bank 
|EXCHANGE BK, LUCKEY, OHIO              | 43324   | 06/06/2005 | 09/06/2005     | S         | Small Bank 
|NORTH SIDE B&TC, CINCINNATI, OHIO      | 615217  | 11/29/2004 | 12/13/2005     | NI        | Large Bank 
|WHITAKER BK, LEXINGTON, KENTUCKY       | 1445943 | 05/16/2005 | 09/08/2005     | S         | Large Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
# C_2014129EN.01001702.xml

| 28.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2014 — American Express Marketing & Development v OHIM (IP ZONE)

(Joined Cases T-102/11 and T-369/12 to T-371/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Applications for Community word marks IP ZONE, EUROPE IP ZONE, IP ZONE EUROPE and EUROPEAN IP ZONE - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2014/C 129/21)

Language of the cases: English

Parties

Applicant: American Express Marketing & Development Corp. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: V. Spitz, A. Gaul, T. Golda and S. Kirschstein-Freund, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo and P. Bullock, acting as Agents)

Re:

Actions brought against the decisions of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 December 2010 (Case R 1125/2010-2) and 12 June 2012 (Cases R 1451/2011-2, R 1452/2011-2 and R 1453/2011-2) concerning applications for registration of the sign IP ZONE and of the signs EUROPE IP ZONE, IP ZONE EUROPE and EUROPEAN IP ZONE, respectively, as Community trade marks.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions;

| 2. | Orders American Express Marketing & Development Corp. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders American Express Marketing & Development Corp. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 130, 30.4.2011.

---