alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013009EN.01003403.xml

| 12.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/34

---

Order of the President of the Court of 22 October 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen — Sweden) — Eva-Marie Brännström, Rune Brännström v Ryanair Holdings plc

(Case C-150/12) (1)

1

2013/C 9/59

Language of the case: Swedish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 157, 2.6.2012.

1

---
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 4:15-cv-11502-TGB-APP

JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address

98.209.124.170,

Defendant.

/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

WITH PREJUDICE OF JOHN DOE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, Plaintiff has settled this matter with John Doe

(“Defendant”). Pursuant to the settlement agreement’s terms, Plaintiff hereby voluntarily

dismisses Defendant from this action with prejudice. John Doe was assigned the IP address

98.209.124.170. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) Defendant John Doe has neither

answered Plaintiff’s Complaint nor filed a motion for summary judgment.

Consistent herewith Plaintiff consents to the Court having its case closed for

administrative purposes.

Dated: August 31, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Paul J. Nicoletti

Paul J. Nicoletti

pauljnicoletti@gmail.com

NICOLETTI LAW, PLC

33717 Woodward Avenue, Suite #433

Birmingham, Michigan 48009

Phone: (248) 203-7800

Attorney for Plaintiff

4:15-cv-11502-TGB-APP Doc # 8 Filed 08/31/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 56
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 31, 2015, I electronically filed the foregoing document

with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF and that service was perfected on all counsel of

record and interested parties through this system.

By: /s/ Paul J. Nicoletti_______

Paul J. Nicoletti

4:15-cv-11502-TGB-APP Doc # 8 Filed 08/31/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 57
§ 203.5 Types of hearings. ( a ) *Oral Evidentiary Hearing:* If, upon review of the application, answers, petitions to intervene and replies, the Administration determines that the proceeding involves a disputed issue of material fact which cannot be resolved on the basis of available information of record, and that the case is anticipated to involve the submission of extensive evidence, or the Administration determines that it is otherwise appropriate, the Administration may issue an order referring the case to an Administrative Law Judge for oral evidentiary hearing. Such hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures set out in 46 CFR part 201. The Administration may resolve issues of intervention in such order or refer such issues to the Administrative Law Judge. The burden of establishing that there is a disputed issue of material fact is upon the party seeking the oral evidentiary hearing.
( b ) *Hearing on Submission of Written Evidence and Argument:* If, upon review of the application, answers, petitions to intervene and replies, the Administration determines that the proceeding involves a disputed issue of material fact which cannot be resolved on the basis of available information of record, but which is not anticipated to involve the submission of extensive evidence, the Administration may fulfill the hearing requirement in sections 605(c) and 805(a) of the Act by rendering a decision solely on the merits of papers submitted, provided that a full and true disclosure of the facts is made and such procedure is fair to all parties. The Administration may, in its discretion, direct the submission of briefs on legal issues together with evidence in written form, and/or the holding of oral argument before the Administration prior to issuing its final decision on the proceeding.
( c ) *Show Cause Proceeding:* If, upon review of the application, answers, petitions to intervene and replies, the Administration determines that the proceeding does not or is not likely to involve a disputed issue of material fact or that if such facts exist they can be resolved on the basis of available information subject to official notice, and if the case is not anticipated to involve the submission of extensive evidence, the Administration may determine to handle the matter by show-cause proceeding. In that event, it will issue a decision setting out its tentative conclusions on all of the matters of fact and law at issue in the proceeding. A Notice summarizing such decision shall be published in the Federal Register in accordance with 46 CFR 201.72. Interested persons may file comments, including support or rebuttal for any matter officially noticed, within 30 days of the date of service of the tentative decision and responses to such comments shall be filed within ten days thereafter unless a shorter or longer period is provided by the Administration for such comments and answers.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1298

NATHAN ANDREW GROVES; JOEL STROUD,

Plaintiffs – Appellants,

v.

DARLINGTON SOUTH CAROLINA, THE CITY OF,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(4:08-cv-00402-TLW)

Submitted: November 9, 2011 Decided: December 8, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joel F. Stroud, JOEL F. STROUD, Chesterfield, South Carolina, 

for Appellants. J. Scott Kozacki, WILLCOX, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, 

P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

The Appellants, Nathan Andrew Groves and Joel Flake 

Stroud, appeal the district court’s order adopting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary 

judgment in favor of the Appellee and rendering the Appellee’s 

pending motions moot, and the magistrate judge’s order denying 

the Appellants’ motion to transfer the case to another division 

of the district court. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

and magistrate judge’s orders. We also deny the Appellants’ 

motion to expedite the decision as moot. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT**

**ITEM 31.2**

 

SECTION 302CERTIFICATION

 

I, Bruce N. Warner certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSBof Northern California Bancorp, Inc.;

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.         The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.         The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee orregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)              all significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)             any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  March 26, 2008 | /s/  Bruce N. Warner         |
|----------------------------|------------------------------|
|                       | Bruce N. Warner              |
|                       | Chief Financial Office       |
|                       | Principal Accounting Officer |

 

----
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, George L. Ball, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.      The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.      The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ GEORGE L.
  BALL


George L.
Ball


Chief
Executive Officer





November
9, 2010





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sanders Morris Harris
Group Inc. and will be retained by Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# C_2014045EN.01001401.xml

| 15.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) — United Kingdom) — Eli Lilly and Company Ltd v Human Genome Sciences Inc

(Case C-493/12) (1)

1

(Medicinal products for human use - Supplementary protection certificate - Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 - Article 3 - Conditions for obtaining such a certificate - Concept of a ‘product protected by a basic patent in force’ - Criteria - Wording of the claims of the basic patent - Precision and specificity - Functional definition of an active ingredient - Structural definition of an active ingredient - European Patent Convention)

2014/C 45/24

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

High Court of Justice (Chancery Division)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Eli Lilly and Company Ltd

Applicant:

Defendant: Human Genome Sciences Inc

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Interpretation of Article 3(a) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (OJ 2009 L 152, p. 1) — Conditions for obtaining a certificate — Concept of a ‘product protected by a basic patent in force’ — Criteria for assessment — Application of criteria to products not composed of a combination of medicinal products and medical devices

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(a) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products must be interpreted as meaning that, in order for an active ingredient to be regarded as ‘protected by a basic patent in force’ within the meaning of that provision, it is not necessary for the active ingredient to be identified in the claims of the patent by a structural formula. Where the active ingredient is covered by a functional formula in the claims of a patent issued by the European Patents Office, Article 3(a) of that regulation does not, in principle, preclude the grant of a supplementary protection certificate for that active ingredient, on condition that it is possible to reach the conclusion on the basis of those claims, interpreted inter alia in the light of the description of the invention, as required by Article 69 of the Convention on the Grant of European Patents and the Protocol on the interpretation of that provision, that the claims relate, implicitly but necessarily and specifically, to the active ingredient in question, which is a matter to be determined by the referring court.

---

(1)  OJ C 9, 12.1.2013.

1

---
EXHIBIT 21
                       SUBSIDIARIES  OF  THE  COMPANY

Name                State of Incorporation     Date of Incorporation      Status
----               -----------------------     ---------------------      ------

Big  City  NY,  Inc.     New York           November 26, 1997    Wholly-owned by
                                                         VillageWorld.com,  Inc.

Bagel  Partners, Inc.    Delaware           May 7, 1996          Wholly-owned by
                                                         VillageWorld.com,  Inc.

Intelligent  Computer
Solutions,  Inc.         New  York          October 21, 1994    Wholly-owned  by
                         VillageWorld.com,  Inc.

Village  Net,  Inc.      New  York          June 6, 1995         Wholly-owned by
                                                         VillageWorld.com,  Inc.

Biometrics  2000  Acquisition
Corporation              New  York          November 10, 2003   Wholly-owned  by
                                                         VillageWorld.com,  Inc.

<PAGE>
#### § 131.940 Marine sanitation device.

Each vessel with installed toilet facilities must have a marine sanitation device in compliance with 33 CFR part 159.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Stephen L. Day, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DOVER SADDLERY, INC.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 13, 2007 /s/ Stephen L. Day   Stephen L. DayPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director*(Principal Executive Officer)*
§ 188.05-1 Vessels subject to requirements of this subchapter. ( a ) This subchapter is applicable to all U.S.-flag vessels indicated in Column 6 of Table 2.01-7(A) to the extent prescribed by applicable laws and the regulations in this subchapter, except as follows: ( 1 ) Any foreign vessel.
( 2 ) Any vessel operating exclusively on inland waters which are not navigable waters of the United States.
( 3 ) Any vessel while laid up and dismantled and out of commission.
( 4 ) With the exception of vessels of the U.S. Maritime Administration, any vessel with title vested in the United States and which is used for public purposes.
( b ) [Reserved]
[CGFR 67-83, 33 FR 1113, Jan. 27, 1968, as amended at 42 FR 49027, Sept. 26, 1977; 43 FR 968, Jan. 5, 1978; CGD 77-081, 46 FR 56204, Nov. 16, 1981; CGD 86-033, 53 FR 36026, Sept. 16, 1988; 53 FR 46871, Nov. 21, 1988; CGD 90-008, 55 FR 30664, July 26, 1990; USCG-1999-5040, 67 FR 34800, May 15, 2002; USCG-2008-1107, 74 FR 63664, Dec. 4, 2009; 78 FR 56612, Sept. 13, 2013; USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58288, Sept. 29, 2014]
Case 2:15-cv-11520-MAG-APP ECF No. 7, PageID.21 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:15-cv-11520-MAG-APP ECF No. 7, PageID.22 Filed 05/27/15 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

** **

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

                In connection with the Quarterly Report ofEvercel, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report"), I, Garry A. Prime, President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                1)             The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

                2)             The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/Garry A. Prime                                       Garry A. PrimePresident and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 18, 2003
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.110-2 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this subpart with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material is available for inspection at the U.S. Coast Guard, Office of Design and Engineering Standards (CG-ENG), 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, and is available from the sources listed below. It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html*.
( b ) International Maritime Organization (IMO) Publishing, 4 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR, United Kingdom, +44 (0)20 7735 7611, *http://www.imo.org*. ( 1 ) 2010 FTP Code, International Code for Application of Fire Test Procedures, 2010 (Resolution MSC.307(88)), 2012 Edition (“FTP Code”), IBR approved for § 164.110-3(a).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
#### § 169.679 Wiring for power and lighting circuits.

Wiring for each power and lighting circuit must meet subpart 111.60 of this chapter.
1:14-cv-14122-TLL-PTM Doc # 28 Filed 02/17/15 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 898
1:14-cv-14122-TLL-PTM Doc # 28 Filed 02/17/15 Pg 2 of 6 Pg ID 899
1:14-cv-14122-TLL-PTM Doc # 28 Filed 02/17/15 Pg 3 of 6 Pg ID 900
1:14-cv-14122-TLL-PTM Doc # 28 Filed 02/17/15 Pg 4 of 6 Pg ID 901
1:14-cv-14122-TLL-PTM Doc # 28 Filed 02/17/15 Pg 5 of 6 Pg ID 902
1:14-cv-14122-TLL-PTM Doc # 28 Filed 02/17/15 Pg 6 of 6 Pg ID 903
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.064-7 Recognized laboratory. ( a ) A manufacturer seeking Coast Guard approval of a product under this subpart shall follow the approval procedures of subpart 159.005 of this chapter, and shall apply for approval directly to a recognized independent laboratory. The following laboratories are recognized under § 159.010-7 of this part, to perform testing and approval functions under this subpart: Underwriters Laboratories, 12 Laboratory Drive, P.O. Box 13995, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3995, (919) 549-1400.
( b ) Production oversight must be performed by the same laboratory that performs the approval tests unless, as determined by the Commandant, the employees of the laboratory performing production oversight receive training and support equal to that of the laboratory that performed the approval testing.
[CGD 93-055, 61 FR 13931, Mar. 28, 1996]
# C_2014315EN.01002601.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/26

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 June 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal do Trabalho do Porto — Portugal) — Sindicato Nacional dos Profissionais de Seguros e Afins v Fidelidade Mundial — Companhia de Seguros, SA

(Case C-264/12) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - National legislation establishing salary reductions for certain public sector workers - No implementation of EU law - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court of Justice))

2014/C 315/39

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal do Trabalho do Porto

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sindicato Nacional dos Profissionais de Seguros e Afins

Applicant:

Defendant: Fidelidade Mundial — Companhia de Seguros, SA

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union manifestly lacks jurisdiction with regard to the request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal do Trabalho do Porto (Portugal), made by decision of 22 May 2012 (Case C-264/12).

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 14.7.2012.

1

---