alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the sixth meeting of the American Health Information Community Personalized Healthcare Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.)

# DATES:

June 7, 2007, from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. [Eastern Daylight Time].

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090 (please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​healthcare/​*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Workgroup will discuss possible common data standards to incorporate interoperable, clinically useful genetic laboratory test data, family history information, and analytical tools into Electronic Health Records (EHR) to support clinical decision-making for the health care provider and patient.

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional information, go to:                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​healthcare/​phc_​instruct.html.*

Dated: April 31, 2007.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordination for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 07-2274 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 8, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-1361

Lower Tribunal Nos. F20-6666 & F19-8825

________________

Keschener Destin,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Laura Shearon Cruz, Judge.

Keschener Destin, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, GORDO, and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The order denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed. 
2

Upon the Court’s own motion, the appeal of the trial court’s order denying 

appellant’s pro se motion to dismiss is hereby dismissed as an appeal taken 

from a non-final, non-appealable order. See Charlemagne v. State, 207 So. 

3d 237 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (unpublished table decision).

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.
§ 195.03-1 Installation and details. ( a ) The installation of all systems of a marine engineering nature, together with the details of design, construction, and installation, shall be in accordance with the requirements of Subchapter F (Marine Engineering) of this chapter. Systems of this type include the following:
Steering Systems. Bilge and Ballast Systems. Tank Vent and Sounding Systems. Overboard Discharges and Shell Connections. Pipe and Pressure Systems. Liquefied Petroleum Gas Systems.
#### Sec. 18 Group classification.

In the preparation of specifications, Job Orders, Supplemental Job Orders and WORKSMALREP Contracts costs by Group Numbers as set forth and described below are to be inserted thereon:

| Number | Classification |
| --- | --- |
| 41 | *Maintenance Repairs* (deck, engine and stewards department repairs resulting from wear and tear). |
| 42 | *Original installation of, repairs to, and removal of national defense features.* |
| 44 | *Conversions* (conversion of vessels to troop carriers, hospital ships, and for other special purposes). |
| 51 | *Alterations, Additions and Betterments* (additional equipment, such as, spar decks, heavy lift equipment, change of cargo or passenger space, increasing speed of vessel, and structural changes). |
| 52 | *Strengthening of Newly Constructed Vessels* (strengthening of vessels according to program). |
| 54 | *Damage Repairs* (claimed as a result of enemy action, heavy weather, stranding, collision, fire, stevedore damage, ice damage, and other damages). |
| | **Note:** All items chargeable to each separate casualty to be properly identified and segregated both with respect to casualty and cost. |
| 63 | *Builders' and Vendors' Guaranty Work* (repairs and replacements chargeable to builders and vendors of equipment—separate cost to be furnished for each item). |
| 64 | *Repair Contractors' Guarantee Items* (repairs to correct deficiencies due to faulty workmanship and/or materials incident to prior repairs performed under provisions of Master Repair Contract where responsible contractor did not effect the necessary corrections). |
| 65 | *Other Costs* (temporary lights, garbage disposal, tugs to shift vessel while in contractors' yard, and other miscellaneous work requiring distribution of costs over more than one group). |
| 66 | *Miscellaneous Expenses Applicable to Voyage Operating Expense* (removal of cargo debris, fresh water when not required for testing purposes, cleaning cargo and other tanks where no repairs or alterations are involved, and other similar expenses). |
| 67 | *Preparation of Vessels for Lay-up* (stripping, draining and preservation. No repairs to be included in this grouping). |
§ 137.200 Documenting compliance for the Coast Guard inspection option. A towing vessel subject to this subchapter and choosing the Coast Guard inspection option, or required to have the Coast Guard inspection option, must undergo an annual inspection within 3 months before or after the COI anniversary date. ( a ) Owners and managing operators must contact the cognizant Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI) to schedule an inspection at a time and place the OCMI approves. No written application is required.
( b ) Annual inspections will be similar to the inspection for certification but will cover less detail unless the marine inspector finds deficiencies or determines that a major change has occurred since the last inspection. If the marine inspector finds deficiencies or finds that a major change to the vessel has occurred, he or she will conduct a more detailed inspection to ensure that the vessel is in satisfactory condition and fit for the service for which it is intended. If the vessel passes the annual inspection, the Coast Guard will endorse the vessel's current Certificate of Inspection (COI).
( c ) If the annual inspection reveals the need, the owner or managing operator must make any or all repairs or improvements within the time period specified by the OCMI. The OCMI may use Form CG-835, “Notice of Merchant Marine Inspection Requirements,” to record deficiencies discovered during the inspection. The OCMI will then give a copy of the completed form to the master of the vessel.
( d ) Nothing in this subpart limits the marine inspector from conducting any tests or inspections he or she deems necessary to be assured of the vessel's seaworthiness or fitness for its route and service.
Editorial Note on Part 199
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 199 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59789, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 199.250 Drills. ( a ) An abandon-ship drill and a fire drill, as described in § 199.180, must be conducted on each passenger vessel at least weekly.
( b ) The entire crew does not have to be involved in every drill, but each crewmember must participate in an abandon-ship drill and a fire drill each month.
( c ) Passengers and special personnel must be strongly encouraged to attend abandon-ship and fire drills.
#### FRANCES C. ROGERS, PLAINTIFF, v. PUBLIC SERVICE RAILWAY COMPANY, DEFENDANT.

Decided May 4, 1929.

Before Gummeke, Chief Justice, and Justice Pabkeb.

For the rule, *Henry H. Fryling.*

*Contra, James W. Rea, Jr.*

Pee Cukiam.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover compensation for personal injuries suffered by her and for damage done to her automobile resulting from a collision with a trolley car of the defendant in June, 1926, at about nine o’clock in the evening. The trial resulted in a verdict in her favor, the jury awarding her $1,200.

Our examination of the evidence sent up with the rule satisfies us that, on her own testimony, the collision is shown to have been the result in part, if not altogether, of her own negligence.

For this reason, the rule to show cause will be made absolute.
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.109-2 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this subpart with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material is available for inspection at the U.S. Coast Guard, Office of Design and Engineering Standards (CG-ENG), 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, and is available from the sources listed below. It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html*.
( b ) International Maritime Organization (IMO) Publishing, 4 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR, United Kingdom, +44 (0)20 7735 7611, *http://www.imo.org*. ( 1 ) 2010 FTP Code, International Code for Application of Fire Test Procedures, 2010 (Resolution MSC.307(88)), 2012 Edition (“FTP Code”), IBR approved for § 164.109-3(a).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-26517, 333-34652 and 333-51133 on Form S-3, No. 333-46407 on Form S-4 and
Nos. 333-14863, 333-61723, 333-49091 and 333-49922 on Form S-8 of Loral Space &
Communications Ltd. (a Bermuda company) of our reports with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Loral Space & Communications Ltd. and
Globalstar, L.P. and the consolidated financial statement schedule of Loral
Space & Communications Ltd., appearing in or incorporated by reference in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Loral Space & Communications Ltd. for the year
ended December 31, 2000.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
San Jose, California
March 27, 2001
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

638 

CA 13-01521 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

RESETARITS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, 

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

ELIZABETH PIERCE OLMSTED, M.D. CENTER FOR THE 

VISUALLY IMPAIRED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, 

AND EPO-STOVROFF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORP., 

DEFENDANT. 

------------------------------------------------ 

ELIZABETH PIERCE OLMSTED, M.D. CENTER FOR THE 

VISUALLY IMPAIRED AND EPO-STOVROFF HOUSING 

DEVELOPMENT FUND CORP., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS,

V

 

PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, 

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

 

JAECKLE FLEISCHMANN & MUGEL, LLP, BUFFALO (BEVERLY S. BRAUN OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (ANDREW O. MILLER OF

COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy

J. Walker, A.J.), entered May 15, 2013. The order, among other

things, granted that part of plaintiff’s motion seeking summary

judgment against defendant Elizabeth Pierce Olmstead, M.D. Center for

the Visually Impaired. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed 

without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988;

Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; CPLR

5501 [a] [1]). 

Entered: June 20, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
# Jewish American Heritage Month, 2007

The faith and hard work of Jewish Americans have played an integral role in shaping the cultural fabric of America. During Jewish American Heritage Month, we celebrate the vital contributions of Jewish Americans to our Nation.

Throughout our history, Jewish Americans have contributed to the strength of our country and the preservation of our values. The talent and imagination of these citizens have helped our Nation prosper, and their efforts continue to remind us of America's gift of religious freedom and the blessings of God's steadfast love. Jewish Americans have worked to promote civil rights and build bridges of mutual understanding among the world's religions. Their deep commitment to faith and strong ties to family enrich our country and set a positive example for others.

This month is also a time to recognize the sacrifices of Jewish Americans who serve our Nation in the Armed Forces. These brave men and women are dedicated to freedom's cause, and all those who live in freedom live in their debt.

Jewish American Heritage Month is an opportunity to honor the accomplishments of Jewish-American citizens and to remember that our Nation is a melting pot of cultures. I join all Americans in celebrating the rich Jewish heritage and the many ways Jewish Americans contribute to a bright future for our country.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 2007 as Jewish American Heritage Month. I call upon all Americans to observe this month with appropriate programs and activities to honor Jewish Americans across the country.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirtieth day of April, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 07-2217

Billing code 3195-01-P
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Mike L. Wilhelms, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Triad FinancialCorporation, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Triad Financial Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c. Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.              /s/ Mike L. Wilhelms   Mike L. Wilhelms   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   Dated: November 9, 2007
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6020
DANIEL E. FELIX, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusRON ANGELONE, Director, Department of Corrections, Virginia; D. LAWSON, Warden, Greensville Correctional Center; D. WILLIAMS, Corrections Officer, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-94-1638-AM) Submitted: June 12, 1997 Decided: June 17, 1997 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel E. Felix, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Theresa Bowers, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Felix v. Angelone , No. CA-94-1638-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 15, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Order filed December 4, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

___________

NO. 01-14-00182-CR

____________

WARIS NADIR SUBLET, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 262nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1378742

ORDER
This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of Defendant’s Exhibit #45 

and Defendant’s Exhibit #45-A.

The exhibit clerk of the 262nd District Court is directed to deliver to the 

Clerk of this court the original of Defendant’s Exhibit #45 and Defendant’s Exhibit 

#45-A, on or before December 9, 2014. The Clerk of this court is directed to 

receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of 

this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the 

original of Defendant’s Exhibit #45 and Defendant’s Exhibit #45-A, to the clerk of 

the 262nd District Court.

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2131 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2131

 To amend the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 to 
 reauthorize the United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2009

  Ms. Watson (for herself, Mr. Butterfield, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr. 
Connolly of Virginia, Ms. Moore of Wisconsin, Mr. Hare, Ms. Fudge, Ms. 
 Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Mr. Kucinich, 
Mr. Cleaver, Mr. Carnahan, Ms. Berkley, and Ms. Kilpatrick of Michigan) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                            Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 to 
 reauthorize the United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF UNITED STATES ADVISORY COMMISSION ON 
              PUBLIC DIPLOMACY.

    Section 1334 of the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 
1998 (22 U.S.C. 6553) is amended by striking ``October 1, 2009'' and 
inserting ``October 1, 2011''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2011252EN.01003602.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/36

---

Action brought on 21 June 2011 — UCP Backus y Johnston v OHIM (Shape of a bottle)

(Case T-323/11)

2011/C 252/82

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Unión de Cervecerías Peruanas Backus y Johnston SAA (Lima, Peru) (represented by E. Armijo Chávarri, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare the action against the Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office of 23 March 2011 in Case R 2238/2010-2 to be brought in due form and time, and |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the action against the Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office of 23 March 2011 in Case R 2238/2010-2 to be brought in due form and time, and

| — | Following the appropriate procedural steps, give judgment annulling the abovementioned decision and expressly order the Office to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Following the appropriate procedural steps, give judgment annulling the abovementioned decision and expressly order the Office to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Three-dimensional trade mark consisting in the shape of a bottle (application No 8.592.081) for goods in Class 32 (‘beer’)

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Application refused.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Incorrect interpretation and application of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark.

Pleas in law:

---
Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 6/3/15

Regional Airline Association 6/3/15

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 6/3/15

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 6/3/15
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Mark Wilhelm, * From the 161st District

 Court of Ector County,

 Trial Court No. B-37,085.

Vs. No. 11-13-00358-CR * May 22, 2014

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal 

should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal 

is dismissed.