alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Irvin H. McBride and Frank W. Palmer, *Respondents, v.*John Read and Henry Brien, *Appellants, Impleaded, etc*.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending April 1, 2006

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                               | End of Comment Period                              
|----------------- | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|NEW CENTURY BANK  | * Branch       | New Century Bank, Phoenixville, PA, to establish a branch office at the Lincoln Court Shopping Center, Route 30, Malvern, PA. | Newspaper:04/07/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | 04/07/2006    
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|STERLING BK, MOUNT LAUREL, NEW JERSEY | 1819366 | 10/17/2005 | 03/22/2006     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
# C_2014009EN.01002202.xml

| 11.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 November 2013 — Heede v OHIM (Matrix-Energetics)

(Case T-313/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark Matrix-Energetics - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Relevant public - Date of the determination of the descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2014/C 9/35

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Günter Heede (Walldorf-Baden) (represented by: R. Utz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: K. Klüpfel, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 April 2011 (Case R 1848/2010-4) concerning the application for registration of the word sign Matrix-Energetics as a Community word mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Günter Heede to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Günter Heede to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1626

ANGELA GEORGES,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DOMINION PAYROLL SERVICES, LLC,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:16-cv-00777-MHL)

Submitted: February 1, 2019 Decided: February 7, 2019

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jameson Alec Goodell, Paul L. Warren, WARREN PLC, Norfolk, Virginia, for 

Appellant. Brian G. Muse, Faith A. Alejandro, SANDS ANDERSON PC, Richmond, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Angela Georges appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in 

favor of the Appellee on Georges’ claim alleging age discrimination. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. Georges v. Dominion Payroll Servs., LLC, No. 3:16-cv-00777-MHL 

(E.D. Va. May 4, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 (the "Form 10-Q") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").





I, Tracey A. Welsh, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Issuer, certify that to my knowledge:





(i)
the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii)
the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.





Dated: November 14, 2012








/s/ Tracey A. Welsh


Tracey A. Welsh


Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
##### 



Exhibit 21 MATRIA HEALTHCARE, INC. SUBSIDIARIES
March 10, 2005 Jurisdiction ofName
    
    IncorporationMatria Health Enhancement Co. (formerly Clinical-Management
Systems, Inc.)
    
    GeorgiaQuality Oncology, Inc.
    
    DelawareMatria Case Management, Inc. (formerly Options
Unlimited Division)
    
    New YorkMatria Womens and Childrens Health, Inc. (formerly
Matria Healthcare, Inc.)
    
    Delaware*Matria Healthcare Puerto Rico, Inc. (being dissolved)
    
    Puerto RicoMatria of New York, Inc.
    
    New YorkMatria Healthcare of Illinois, Inc.
    
    Georgia*National Reproductive Medical Centers, Inc.
    
    Delaware*Infertility Management Services, Inc.
    
    Delaware*PFCC Liquidation Corp. (formerly Pacific
Fertility Centers of California, Inc.)
    
    California*PFMG Liquidation Corp. (formerly
Pacific Fertility Medical Group, Inc.)
    
    California*PFPC Liquidation Corp. (formerly Pacific
Fertility Parenting Center, Inc.)
    
    CaliforniaDiabetes Acquisition, Inc.
    
    GeorgiaGainor Medical Acquisition Company
    
    Georgia*Diabetes Management Solutions, Inc. (formerly
USCI Healthcare Management Solutions, Inc.)
    
    Delaware*Diabetes Self Care, Inc.
    
    Virginia*Matria Laboratories, Inc.
    
    DelawareMatria Holding GmbH
    
    Germany (LLC)(65% held by Diabetes Acquisition, Inc.,
35% by Matria Healthcare, Inc.)
eu-Medical GmbH
    
    Germany (LLC)Dia Real GmbH & Co. KG
    
    Germany (LLC)Facet Technologies, LLC (formerly Gainor Medical
North America, L.L.C.)
    
    GeorgiaFacet Technologies Limited (formerly GainorMedical United Kingdom Europe Limited)
    
    United KingdomMHI Insurance Ltd.
    
    Vermont*Shared Care, Inc.
    
    Georgia
    Note: The above subsidiaries (except for Matria Healthcare Puerto Rico, Inc., in which
Matria owns a 51% interest and Matria Holding GmbH, in which Matria owns a 35% interest) are
directly or indirectly 100% owned by Matria Healthcare, Inc. Matria Sub List March 2005 After Reorganization
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Central Federal Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date:      November 12, 2010
    /s/ Eloise L. MackusEloise L. Mackus, Esq.Interim Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                       HEALTH SYSTEMS DESIGN CORPORATION

                       COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE

                    (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                1999       1998       1997
                                                              --------   --------   --------
<S>                                                           <C>        <C>        <C>
Net loss....................................................  $  (596)   $  (839)   $(3,856)
                                                              =======    =======    =======

Weighted average common shares outstanding:
    Basic...................................................    6,706      6,589      6,479
                                                              -------    -------    -------
    Diluted.................................................    6,706      6,589      6,479
                                                              -------    -------    -------

Net loss per common share, basic and diluted................  $ (0.09)   $ (0.13)   $ (0.60)
                                                              =======    =======    =======
</TABLE>

Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share:

    Basic net income (loss) per common share (Basic EPS) excludes dilution and
is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share
(Diluted EPS) reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock options
or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common
stock. The computation of Diluted EPS does not assume exercise or conversion of
securities that would have an antidilutive effect on net income per common
share. In periods where losses are recorded, common stock equivalents would
decrease the loss per share and are therefore not added to the weighted average
shares outstanding.
Case 5:14-cv-14260-JCO-RSW   ECF No. 1, PageID.1   Filed 11/05/14   Page 1 of 5

Case 5:14-cv-14260-JCO-RSW   ECF No. 1, PageID.2   Filed 11/05/14   Page 2 of 5

Case 5:14-cv-14260-JCO-RSW   ECF No. 1, PageID.3   Filed 11/05/14   Page 3 of 5

Case 5:14-cv-14260-JCO-RSW   ECF No. 1, PageID.4   Filed 11/05/14   Page 4 of 5

Case 5:14-cv-14260-JCO-RSW   ECF No. 1, PageID.5   Filed 11/05/14   Page 5 of 5
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1


<PAGE>


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Michael J. Smith, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Cybernet Internet Services International, Inc. (the "Company"), certify pursuant
to Section 906 of the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
          period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) of the SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
          (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated: September 30, 2003

                                      /s/ Michael J. Smith
                                      -----------------------------------
                                      Michael J. Smith
                                      Chief Executive Officer and
                                      Chief Financial Officer




                          -----------------------------


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Cybernet Internet Services International, Inc. and will be retained
by Cybernet Internet Services International, Inc.and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2053 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 525 

Magoffin Avenue in El Paso, Texas, as the ‘‘Albert 

Armendariz, Sr., United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2053 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The United States courthouse located at 525 

3 Magoffin Avenue in El Paso, Texas, shall be known and 

4 designated as the ‘‘Albert Armendariz, Sr., United States 

5 Courthouse’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

9 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

10 to be a reference to the ‘‘Albert Armendariz, Sr., United 

11 States Courthouse’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 9, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Declan French, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Thinkpath Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September
30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Thinkpath Inc.


Date:  November 19, 2007                    By: /s/ Declan French
                                                -----------------
                                                Name:    Declan French
                                                Title:   Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Thinkpath Inc. and will be retained by Thinkpath Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 167.15-1 Inspections required. ( a ) Before a vessel may be used as a nautical school ship, it shall be inspected by the Coast Guard to determine that the hull, boilers, machinery, equipment and appliances comply with the regulations in this part.
( b ) Every nautical school ship subject to the regulations in this part shall be inspected annually, or oftener if necessary, by the Coast Guard to determine that the hull, boilers, machinery, equipment and appliances comply with the regulations in this part.
( c ) Nautical school ships while laid up and dismantled and out of commission are exempt from any or all inspections required by law or regulations in this part.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN February 7, 1939
Honorable A. E. Hloke::son county Auditor Conroe, Texae
Dam Bdr.

Hlokerson2 Opinion x0. Q-187/ A \ He: Salaries of 2oputy Tax As$eesora and Collactors

,' “\~ 88 are in receipt of youS/.letteP of .?anuery qw:,tlnK opinion from ycv!rletter are as fol’lowa:

Asmaaor of

em&oykd h&e been deslgmated the heed of ?.hedepartment. 'Theeroployees OD.this list represent all of thr,

employees In this offloe. “For your information, the IWO Census Fives Monteonery County a population of 14,508. The 1939 valuation is $51,423,000." Ke dlreot your attention to Xrtlcle 3902, Kevleod Civil Statutes, wh:oh ro[<uletesthe salary oi' dep'ltlcs

and esoiritants

for district, oounty or Freoinot offiof.rs. We note from pour letter, (18etove quoted, that Uont@omery oounty haa a population of less than 25,000. This be!ny, true,, slont~o~nery

oounty offlcors' Zepu-Hon. A. E.'iilokerson, February '7,1939, Fai.e2
tIea*, aaaiatants' or clerks' salarieswould be covernedby Section 1 of Article 3902, and for YOUI! oonrenlencev;eset out said Section: "In oountieshavlnc a population of twentyfive t?.cusand(25,300)or less inhabltanrs, first assistant or chief deputy not to exceed Flghteen Hundred ($1800.00)Dollars per annum; other aeslatents deputies or clerks not to exoeed Firteen Hundred ~.$lSQOOOO) Dollars per annum each." From the lanoua.Te of the Article, as above c!ted,we are of the oplnicn, and you are SC advised, that eech o;Pthe officers named in aald Aot are entitled to one ch.lef deputy whose salarywill not exceed $1800,00)perannum. It further provides that the salarir,s of other assistants,deputies or olerks shall not exceed the aum of $1500.00 per mnLa. 'Thesalaries of all such deputies, assistants or clerks must be ?et by the Commissioners'Court.
Yc:urs vetzytruly

By (slsned) Geor.e F. Kirkpatrick

Assistant
GPK*FG APPROVED: (el.qed) Gerald C. Mann ATTO"nNEY

c-l?N-ERAL

OF TEXAS
#### Marcus Fleischauer, *Respondent, v.*John F. Doellner, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc*.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Ingalls, J.
§ 183.210 Protection from wet and corrosive environments. ( a ) Electrical equipment used in the following locations must be dripproof: ( 1 ) A machinery space;
( 2 ) A location normally exposed to splashing, water washdown, or other wet conditions within a galley, a laundry, or a public washroom or toilet room that has a bath or shower; or
( 3 ) Another space with a similar moisture level.
( b ) Electrical equipment exposed to the weather must be watertight.
( c ) Electrical equipment exposed to corrosive environments must be of suitable construction and corrosion-resistant.
Exhibit 10.5



 




Exhibit 10.5



RESTATED AMENDMENT

TO THE KEYCORP

EXCESS 401(K) SAVINGS PLAN




     WHEREAS, KeyCorp has established the KeyCorp Excess 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Plan”), a
nonqualified plan of deferred compensation for a certain select group of KeyCorp employees, and



     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of KeyCorp has authorized its Compensation Committee to permit
amendments to the Plan, and



     WHEREAS, in conjunction with the enactment of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of KeyCorp has determined it desirable to preserve
those earned and vested Plan benefits of December 31, 2004 in accordance with the law in effect
prior to the enactment of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, and accordingly, has authorized
the freezing of the Plan to preserve such benefits as of December 31, 2004, and



     WHEREAS, to effectuate a simplified administration of those December 31, 2004 vested and
frozen Plan benefits under the laws in effect prior to the enactment of the Act, as well as to
comply with the requirements of the Act with regard to those participant Plan benefits that have
not vested as of December 31, 2004, the Compensation Committee has accordingly directed the
establishment of a KeyCorp Second Excess 401(k) Savings Plan.



     NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to such action of the Compensation Committee, the Amendment to the
Plan is hereby restated to clarify that in conjunction with the freezing of all new contributions
and deferrals to the Plan, participants’ not vested Plan benefits as of December 31, 2004 shall be
transferred to the KeyCorp Second Excess 401(k) Savings Plan effective January 1, 2005, as follows:



	 	 	 
	          1.

	 	A new Article XIII has been added to the Plan
to provide the following:
	 
	

	 	“ARTICLE XIII

AMENDMENT TO FREEZE
	 
	

	 	13.1 No New Deferrals or Contributions. As of January 1, 2005 the
Plan shall be frozen with regard to all new accruals, deferrals, and
contributions to the Plan after December 31, 2004 and all Participants’ Plan
benefits that are earned and vested as of December 31, 2004 shall be
administered in accordance with the terms of the Plan as frozen and with the
requirements of the law in effect prior to the enactment of Section 409A of
the Code. In conjunction with the foregoing, all not vested Participant Plan
benefits as of December 31, 2004 shall be transferred to the KeyCorp Second
Excess 401(k) Savings Plan effective January 1, 2005 and shall be administered
in accordance with the requirements of the KeyCorp Second Excess 401(k)
Savings Plan.”
	 
	          2.

	 	The amendment set forth in Paragraphs 1 shall be effective as of December 31, 2004.
	 
	          3.

	 	Except as otherwise amended herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.







     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, KeyCorp has caused this Restated Amendment to the Plan to be executed by
its duly authorized officer on January 20, 2005, to be effective as of December 28, 2004.



	 	 	 
	

	 	KEYCORP
	 
	

	 	By: /s/ Thomas E. Helfrich
	

	 	 
	 
	

	 	Title: Executive Vice President
§ 169.564 Fixed extinguishing system, general. ( a ) A fixed carbon dioxide, Halon 1301, or clean agent extinguishing system must be installed to protect the following spaces: ( 1 ) Any vessel machinery or fuel tank space, except where the space is so open to the atmosphere as to make the use of a fixed system ineffective;
( 2 ) Any paint or oil room, or similar hazardous space; and
( 3 ) Any galley stove area on a vessel greater than 90 feet in length and certificated for exposed or partially protected water service.
( b ) Each fixed extinguishing system must be of an approved carbon dioxide, Halon 1301, halogenated, or clean agent type and installed to the satisfaction of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
[USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33890, June 7, 2012]