alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

                  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
    States Code)

        Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of GWL&A Financial Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

        The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2003 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:         November 13, 2003    /S/ William T. McCallum
                                    __________________________________________
                                    William T. McCallum
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated:         November 13, 2003    /S/ Mitchell T.G. Graye
                                    __________________________________________
                                    Mitchell T.G. Graye
                                    Executive Vice President and
                                    Chief Financial Officer

        The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed
as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2011194EN.01001403.xml

| 2.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/14

---

Action brought on 4 April 2011 — COMPLEX v OHIM — Kajometal (KX)

(Case T-206/11)

2011/C 194/22

Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: COMPLEX S.A. (Łódź, Poland) (represented by: R. Rumpel, legal adviser)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kajometal s.r.o. (Dolny Kubin, Slovakia)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare the action to be well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the action to be well founded;

| — | annul the decision delivered by the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) on 21 January 2011 in Case R 864/2010-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision delivered by the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) on 21 January 2011 in Case R 864/2010-2;

| — | replace the contested decision by a decision refusing registration of the mark KX, No 61225405; |
| --- | --- |

—

replace the contested decision by a decision refusing registration of the mark KX, No 61225405;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Kajometal s.r.o.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: word mark KX for goods in Class 7

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community word mark CX, No 3 588 241, registered for goods in Class 7, Community figurative mark CX PRECISION BEARINGS, No 397 932 , registered for goods in Class 7

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: misapplication of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009, (1) in that there is a likelihood of confusion as between the conflicting marks.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
§ 183.324 Dual voltage generators. ( a ) A dual voltage generator installed on a vessel shall be of the grounded type, where: ( 1 ) The neutral of a dual voltage system must be solidly connected at the switchboard's neutral bus; and
( 2 ) The neutral bus shall be connected to ground.
( b ) The neutral of a dual voltage system must be accessible for checking the insulation resistance of the generator to ground before the generator is connected to the bus.
( c ) Ground detection must be provided that: ( 1 ) For an alternating current system, meets § 111.05-27 in subchapter J of this chapter; and
( 2 ) For a direct current system, meets § 111.05-29 in subchapter J of this chapter.
§ 197.484 Notice of casualty. ( a ) In addition to the requirements of subpart 4.05 of this chapter and 33 CFR 146.30, the person-in-charge shall notify the Officer-in-Charge, Marine Inspection, as soon as possible after a diving casualty occurs, if the casualty involves any of the following: ( 1 ) Loss of life.
( 2 ) Diving-related injury to any person causing incapacitation for more than 72 hours.
( 3 ) Diving-related injury to any person requiring hospitalization for more than 24 hours.
( b ) The notice required by this section must contain the following: ( 1 ) Name and official number (if applicable) of the vessel or facility.
( 2 ) Name of the owner or agent of the vessel or facility.
( 3 ) Name of the person-in-charge.
( 4 ) Name of the diving supervisor.
( 5 ) Description of the casualty including presumed cause.
( 6 ) Nature and extent of the injury to persons.
( c ) The notice required by this section is not required if the written report required by § 197.486 is submitted within 5 days of the casualty.
[CGD 76-009, 43 FR 53683, Nov. 16, 1978, as amended by CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50469, Sept. 29, 1995]
**Exhibit 10.1**

 

[PARK PLACE ENTERTAINMENT(R) LETTERHEAD]

 

Dated as of March 24, 2003

 

Mr. Harry C. Hagerty, III

Park Place EntertainmentCorporation

Park Place and the Boardwalk

Atlantic City, New Jersey 08401

 

Re:          **Amendmentof Employment Agreement Dated March 14, 2002**

 

Dear Harry:

 

In consideration of the termsand conditions contained in the referenced Employment Agreement (the“Employment Agreement”), Park Place Entertainment Corporation (the “Company”and/or “Employer”) and you hereby amend said Employment Agreement as follows:

 

**Paragraph 3A - Compensation:**Effective as of March 24, 2003, your annual salary shall be adjusted to$750,000 for each twelve month period through the remainder of the Term of yourEmployment Agreement with the Company. During the Term, the Base Salary shall be reviewed for possible increaseannually in accordance with the Company’s then applicable merit policies,although any determination to increase the Base Salary shall be within theCompany in its sole discretion.

 

All other terms and conditionsof the referenced agreement shall remain unchanged.

 
| Very truly yours,              |
|--------------------------------|
|                           |
|                           | /s/ Wallace R. Barr |   |
| Wallace R. Barr, President and |
| Chief Executive Officer        |

 

Agreed to:

 
| /s/ Harry C.  Hagerty, III |                |
|----------------------------|---------------------|
| Harry C.  Hagerty, III     |
|                       |
| Dated:                     |   6/16/03 |   |
|                            |                     |  |

 

----
AVAQMD Rule 107 B - 3

Final Staff Report, 06/15/12
EX-10.1






AMENDMENT 2005-1




CORINTHIAN COLLEGES, INC. 2004 NEW-HIRE AWARD PLAN




WHEREAS, Corinthian Colleges, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), maintains the
Corinthian Colleges, Inc. 2004 New-Hire Award Plan (the “Plan”);




WHEREAS, the Company has the right to amend the Plan; and



WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to decrease the number of shares of its common
stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Common Stock”), that is currently available for award
purposes under the Plan so that the aggregate shares available under the Plan equals 265,000 shares
of Common Stock.



NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Section 1.4.2 of the Plan be, and it hereby is, amended
and restated to read in its entirety as follows effective as of the date hereof:




“1.4.2 Share Limits. The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be
delivered pursuant to Awards granted to Eligible Employees under this Plan (the “Share
Limit”) is equal to 265,000 shares. The Share Limit is subject to adjustment as
contemplated by Section 1.4.3 and Section 6.3.”



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its duly authorized officer to execute this
Amendment 2005-1 on this 26th day of January, 2005.




CORINTHIAN COLLEGES, INC.




By: /s/ Stan A. Mortensen




	 	 	 	Print Name: Stan A. Mortensen

Title: Senior Vice President and General Counsel
Order entered November 23, 2016

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 16

- 01335

- CR

No. 05

- 16

- 01357

- CR

EX PARTE MICHAEL CHA RLES MCDERMOTT

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No s. 380

- 80439

- 2015, 380

- 80437

- 2015



### O RDER

We VACATE our order of November 18, 2016 setting scheduling in these appeals

because the appellate cause number for cause no. 05

- 16

- 01357

- CR was incorrect on the order.

We issue this order to reset scheduling on these appeals.

The Court is in r e ce ipt of a pp e l l a nt’s not i c es of a p p ea l f r om the tri a l c ourt ’ s ord e rs

denying relief on his pretrial a ppl i ca t i ons for w r it of h a b e a s c orpus. These are ac c e le ra t e d

a pp e a ls and are g ov e rn e d b y T e x a s R ule of App e l l a te P r o c e dure 3 1.

W e ORDER the tri a l c ourt to pr e p a r e c e rtifi ca t ions of a pp e l l a nt’s r i g ht to a pp ea l a nd t o

file them with i n TEN D A Y S of the d a te of th i s ord e r. S e e T E X

. R

. A PP

. P

. 25.2 (a ), ( d );

Cortez v . Sta t e

, 420 S

. W .3d 803 ( T e x . Crim. App. 2013 )

.

W e ORDER the Col l in Coun t y Distri c t Cle r k to file the c le r k’s r e c o rd s b y

December 12, 2016

. We ORDER that the clerk’s records contain copies of the indictments, thedocuments related to the applications for writ of h abeas corpus, the trial court’s orders, and the

trial court’s certifications of appellant’s right to appeal.

We ORDER the court reporter to file, by December 12, 2016 , either the reporter’s

record or written verification that no hearing was conducted.

W e ORDER a pp e l l a nt t o file his bri e f b y January 3, 2017

. W e ORDER the S tate

to file i t s bri e f b y January 24, 2017

. A ft e r t h e r ec o rds a nd b ri e fs h a ve b ee n fil e d, t h e Court

will not i f y the p a rti e s of the submis s ion date a nd p a n e l.

W e DI R ECT the Cl e rk to s e nd c opies of th i s ord e r to the Hono ra b l e Benjamin N. Smith

,

Pr e sid i ng Jud g e, 380th J udici a l Distri c t Court; Karla Kimbrell

, O f f ici a l C ourt R e port e r, 380th

J udici a l Distri c t C ourt; Lynne Finley, Collin C ou n t y Distri c t C le r k; and c ouns e l for a l l pa r t i e s.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7646

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JASON O’BRYAN MACKEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,

District Judge. (CR-96-114)

Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 4, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jason O’Bryan Mackey, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert,

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jason O’Bryan Mackey appeals from a district court’s order

denying relief on his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion. We dismiss

the appeal as untimely. Mackey did not file his notice of appeal

within the ten-day appeal period or the subsequent thirty-dayextension period after the district court’s order. Fed. R. App. P.

4(b); United States v. Breit, 754 F.2d 526, 528-29 (4th Cir. 1985)

(ten-day appeal period set forth in Fed. R. App. P. 4(b) applies to

Rule 35 motions). Consequently, we are without jurisdiction to

hear the appeal. We deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
# C_2016048EN.01004101.xml

| 8.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Martinair Holland v Commission

(Case T-67/11) (1)

1

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European airfreight market - Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) - Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport - Obligation to state reasons))

(2016/C 048/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Martinair Holland NV (Haarlemmermeer, Netherlands) (represented by: R. Wesseling, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by S. Noë, N. von Lingen and C. Giolito, and subsequently by S. Noë, C. Giolito and A. Dawes, acting as Agents, and by B. Doherty, Barrister)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 7694 final of 9 November 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport (Case COMP/39258 — Airfreight), in so far as it concerns the applicant, or, at the very least, for annulment of Article 5(b) of that decision, in so far as it imposes a fine on the applicant, or for the reduction of that fine.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2010) 7694 final of 9 November 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport (Case COMP/39258 — Airfreight), in so far as it concerns Martinair Holland NV; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2010) 7694 final of 9 November 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport (Case COMP/39258 — Airfreight), in so far as it concerns Martinair Holland NV;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those of Martinair Holland. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those of Martinair Holland.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 26.3.2011.

1

---
PUBLIC LAW 111–217—AUG. 3, 2010 124 STAT. 2369 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4861: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Apr. 26, considered and passed House. 

July 14, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–217 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1343 West 

Irving Park Road in Chicago, Illinois, as the ‘‘Steve Goodman Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. STEVE GOODMAN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 1343 West Irving Park Road in Chicago, Illinois, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Steve Goodman Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Steve Goodman Post Office Building’’. 

Approved August 3, 2010. 

Aug. 3, 2010 

[H.R. 4861] 


kgrant on DSKHRRP4G1PROD with PUBLAW
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Long Island Physician Holdings
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Paul Kolker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                                /s/ Paul Kolker
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Paul Kolker,
                                                President, Chairman of the Board
                                                (Principal Executive Officer)
                                                January 31, 2006

This certification accompanies the above-described Report on Form 10-K/A
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except
to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
CENTRAL FEDERAL CORPORATIONExhibit 31.2Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of the Chief Financial OfficerI, Therese Ann Liutkus, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Central Federal Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the small business issuer, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small businessissuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board ofdirectors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting.          Date: November 13, 2006 /s/ Therese Ann Liutkus         Therese Ann Liutkus, CPA    Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 169.223 Subsequent inspections for certification.

An inspection for renewal of a certificate of inspection includes an inspection of the structure, machinery, yards, spars, masts, rigging, sails, and equipment. The inspection ensures that the vessel is in satisfactory condition, fit for the service intended and complies with the applicable regulations in this subchapter.