alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.1015 Lighting in gas-dangerous space. ( a ) Each gas-dangerous space that has lighting fixtures must have at least two branch circuits for lighting.
( b ) Each switch and each overcurrent protective device for any lighting circuit that is in a gas-dangerous space must open each conductor of the circuit simultaneously.
( c ) Each switch and each overcurrent protective device for lighting in a gas-dangerous space must be in a gas-safe space.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM THE  BALANCE  SHEETS  AND
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY'S  FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1997,  RESTATED  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER
31,  1996 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>                       
<MULTIPLIER>1,000                                   

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               2,250
<SECURITIES>                                        17,668
<RECEIVABLES>                                           60<F1> 
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                            340<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    20,574
<PP&E>                                               1,429<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      22,040
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                1,485
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            33,305
<OTHER-SE>                                             (58)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        22,040
<SALES>                                                 64
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        64
<CGS>                                                  668    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          668
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     4,551<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      51
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (8,780)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (8,780)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0  
<NET-INCOME>                                        (8,780)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (1.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.19)
<FN>
<F1>ITEM SHOWN NET OF ALLOWANCES, CONSISTENT WITH THE BALANCE
    SHEET PRESENTATION.
<F2>ITEM SHOWN NET OF DEPRECIATION, CONSISTENT WITH THE BALANCE
    SHEET PRESENTATION.
<F3>ITEM CONSISTS OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# C_2012058EN.01000402.xml

| 25.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/4

---

Action brought on 9 December 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-635/11)

2012/C 58/05

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J. Enegren and M. van Beek, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to ensure that, in the case of a company resulting from a cross-border merger which has its registered office in the Netherlands, the employees of establishments of that company that are situated in other Member States have the same entitlement to exercise participation rights as is enjoyed by the employees employed in the Netherlands, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under subparagraph (b) of Article 16(2) (introductory sentence and second part of the sentence) of Directive 2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies; (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to ensure that, in the case of a company resulting from a cross-border merger which has its registered office in the Netherlands, the employees of establishments of that company that are situated in other Member States have the same entitlement to exercise participation rights as is enjoyed by the employees employed in the Netherlands, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under subparagraph (b) of Article 16(2) (introductory sentence and second part of the sentence) of Directive 2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies; (1)

1

| — | order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

It is apparent from Article 16(2)(b) of Directive 2005/56/EC that the national law of the Member State in which the company resulting from the cross-border merger has its registered office must provide that employees of establishments of the company resulting from the cross-border merger that are situated in other Member States are to have the same entitlement to exercise participation rights in the company resulting from the cross-border merger as is enjoyed by those employees employed in the Member State in which that new company has its registered office.

Consequently, the national law transposing Directive 2005/56 must provide for all the situations envisaged in Article 16(2) of that directive.

This has not been the case in the Netherlands.

---

(1)  OJ 2005 L 310, p. 1.

1

---
§ 169.667 Switchboards. ( a ) Each switchboard must be in as dry a location as practicable, accessible, protected from inadvertent entry, and adequately ventilated. All uninsulated current carrying parts must be mounted on nonabsorbent, noncombustible, high dielectric insulating material.
( b ) Each switchboard must be— ( 1 ) Totally enclosed; and
( 2 ) Of the dead front type.
( c ) Each ungrounded conductor of a circuit must have at the point of attachment to the power source either— ( 1 ) A Circuit breaker; or
( 2 ) A switch and fuse.
( d ) Each switch other than one mounted on a switchboard must be of the enclosed type.
[CGD 83-005, 51 FR 896, Jan. 9, 1986, as amended by USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58287, Sept. 29, 2014]
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.554 Special requirements for acids. When Table 1 refers to this section: ( a ) Each containment system loading and discharge connection must have a spray shield;
( b ) Each cargo containment system must be separated from bunkers by double walls, such as a cofferdam and piping tunnels; and
( c ) Each vessel must have on board a means to determine whether cargo has leaked into the spaces adjacent to a cargo containment system.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.9




                                    AGREEMENT


GRAVITY Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "GRAVITY") and Sunny YNK Inc.
(hereinafter referred to as "Sunny") hereby enter into this Agreement in
connection with the Investment Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "Original
Agreement") dated February 19, 2002.


1.   In addition to paragraph 1 of the Article 7 of the Original Agreement, both
     parties shall jointly impress their official seals on the bank account that
     was opened in the name of Sunny (the "Account").


2.   The parties agree to allocate and distribute the interest accrued under the
     Account in accordance with the percentage of the Profit Allocation.


3.   The parties agree that the amount described in Article 6 (Investment
     Amount) of the Original Agreement is an advance payment made under the
     condition that GRAVITY shall provide the Game to Sunny for three years and
     that such amount shall be offset on a monthly basis against the monthly
     service fees.


4.   This Agreement shall take precedence over the Original Agreement. Matters
     not stipulated herein shall be governed by the Original Agreement.



February 21, 2002
#### § 185.614 Portable watertight containers for distress flares and smoke signals.

Portable watertight containers for distress flares and smoke signals shall be of a bright color, and containers shall be clearly marked in legible contrasting letters at least 12.7 millimeters (0.5 inches) high: “DISTRESS SIGNALS”.

[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 1005, Jan. 10, 1996; 61 FR 24465, May 15, 1996]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

MICHAEL MILES, 

Plaintiff, Case No. 15-11256-BC

v Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

GARLAND LODGE AND RESORT LLC,

Defendants.

__________________________________________/

ORDER DIRECTING SUBMISSION OF CLOSING

DOCUMENTS

On March 8, 2017, the Court received notice that the parties had reached a settlement

during a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Morris.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the parties are DIRECTED to submit closing 

documents via the Utilities function of CM/ECF on or before April 10, 2017.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: March 10, 2017

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on March 10, 2017.

s/Michael A. Sian 

MICHAEL A. SIAN, Case Manager

Case 1:15-cv-11256-TLL-PTM ECF No. 47 filed 03/10/17 PageID.1178 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.005-1 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) *Specifications and Standards.* This subpart makes reference to the following documents: ( 1 ) Federal Specification: L-P-375C—Plastic Film, Flexible, Vinyl Chloride.
( 2 ) Federal Standards: No. 191—Textile Test Methods. No. 751A—Stitches, Seams, and Stitchings.
( 3 ) Military Specification: MIL-W-530F—Webbing, Textiles, Cotton, General Purpose, Natural and in colors. MIL-R-2766B—Batt, Fibrous Glass, Lifesaving Equipment.
( b ) *Plans.* The following plans, of the issue in effect on the date life preservers are manufactured, form a part of this subpart: Dwg. No. 160.005-1: (Sheet 1) Cutting Pattern and General Arrangement (Adult). (Sheet 2) Alternate Stitching of Tapes and Webbing (Adult and Child). (Sheet 3) Pad Detail (Adult). (Sheet 4) Cutting Pattern and General Arrangement (Child). (Sheet 5) Pad Detail (Child).
( c ) *Copies on file.* Copies of the specifications and plans referred to in this section shall be kept on file by the manufacturer, together with the certificate of approval. They shall be kept for a period consisting of the duration of approval and 6 months after termination of approval. The Coast Guard plans may be obtained upon request from the Commandant (CG-ENG-4), Attn: Lifesaving and Fire Safety Division, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509. The Federal specifications and standards may be purchased from the Business Service Center, General Services Administration, Washington, DC 20407. The Military specifications may be obtained from the Military Specifications and Standards, Standardization Documents Order Desk, Building 4D, 700 Robbins Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094, *https://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/ .*
[CGFR 53-25, 18 FR 7862, Dec. 5, 1953, as amended by CGFR 65-16, 30 FR 10897, Aug. 21, 1965; CGD 78-012, 43 FR 27153, 27154, June 22, 1978; CGD 88-070, 53 FR 34535, Sept. 7, 1988; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60156, Sept. 30, 2013]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending January 21, 2006

|Filer                         | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                          | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------------- | ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|WATFORD CITY BANCSHARES, INC. | * 3A3         | Watford City Bancshares, Inc., Watford City, North Dakota, to acquire 100 percent of Elgin Bancshares, Inc., Elgin, North Dakota and thereby indirectly acquire Farmers State Bank, Elgin, North Dakota. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:02/03/2006
|Newspaper:                    | Not available
|Federal Register:             | 02/03/2006   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case Number: 15-cr-20148 

 v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

 Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris 

DAVID LEE WILSON 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING 

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA 

AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT 

On April 2, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris conducted a plea 

hearing pursuant to Defendant’s consent. The Magistrate Judge issued her report on that same 

day, recommending that this Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty. 

Although the Magistrate Judge’s report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may 

object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, 

neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the 

Magistrate Judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and 

recommendation waives any further right to appeal. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation 

(ECF No. 19) is ADOPTED. 

 It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s plea of guilty is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 

Plea Agreement (ECF No. 18) is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT. 

Dated: April 20, 2015 s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

1:15-cr-20148-TLL-PTM Doc # 22 Filed 04/20/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 93
PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on April 20, 2015. 

 s/Karri Sandusky 

 Karri Sandusky, Acting Case Manager 

1:15-cr-20148-TLL-PTM Doc # 22 Filed 04/20/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 94
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2343 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the partial payment 

requirement on submissions of offers-in-compromise. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2009 

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia (for himself and Mr. BOUSTANY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the partial payment requirement on submissions of offers-in-compromise. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tax Compromise Im5 provement Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF PARTIAL PAYMENT REQUIREMENT ON 

7 SUBMISSIONS OF OFFERS-IN-COMPROMISE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7122 of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subsection (c) 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2343 IH

1 and by redesignating subsections (d), (e), (f), and (g) as 

2 subsection (c), (d), (e), and (f), respectively. 

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

4 (1) Paragraph (3) of section 7122(d) of such 

5 Code is amended— 

6 (A) by inserting ‘‘and’’ at the end of the 

7 subparagraph (A), 

8 (B) by striking ‘‘, and’’ at the end of sub9 paragraph (B) and inserting a period, and 

10 (C) by striking subparagraph (C). 

11 (2) Subsection (f) of section 6159 of such Code 

12 is amended by striking ‘‘section 7122(e)’’ and insert13 ing ‘‘section 7122(d)’’. 

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to offers submitted after the date 

16 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
**This item contains materials that cannot**  **be**

**uploaded to the federal docket. A CD containing**

**files submitted to EPA with the extension .las is available by contacting**  **docket staff via email at**  **Docket_ORD@epamail.epa.gov**
#### § 189.60-35 Availability of Certificates.

The Convention certificates must be on board the vessel and readily available for examination at all times.

[USCG-1999-4976, 65 FR 6510, Feb. 9, 2000]
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Abilene Regional Medical Center, * From the 104th District

Court of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 25879

- B.

Vs. No. 11

- 14

- 00306

- CV * April 9, 2015

Stephanie Wilson, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has considered Abilene Region al Medical Center’s motion to

dismiss its appeal and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in

accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by

reason of this appeal are taxed against Abilene Regional Medical Center.
Non-Employee Director Cash Compensation Arrangements



 Exhibit 10.34 
  
 CONOR MEDSYSTEMS, INC. 
  
 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR CASH 
 COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS 
 (Effective January 19, 2005) 
  
 The following are the cash compensation arrangements for directors of Conor Medsystems, Inc. (the “Company”) who are not employees
of the Company. Directors who are employees of the Company do not receive compensation for their service on the Board and shall receive compensation only in their capacities as employees. The cash compensation arrangements are as follows:

  
 1. Each non-employee director is entitled to receive an
annual retainer fee of $20,000, plus a per meeting fee of $1,500. 
  
 2. Each member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is entitled to receive, in addition to his or her Board compensation, a per meeting fee of $500. 
  
 3. The Chair of each committee of the Board is entitled to receive, in
addition to his or her Board compensation and committee attendance fees, an annual retainer as follow: Chair of the Audit Committee—$7,500; Chair of the Compensation Committee—$5,000; and Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee—$5,000. 
  

 1
§ 172.205 Local damage. ( a ) Each tankship must be shown by design calculations to meet the survival conditions in paragraph (b) of this section in each condition of loading and operation assuming that local damage extending 30 inches (76 cm) normal to the hull shell is applied at any location in the cargo length:
( b ) The vessel is presumed to survive assumed local damage if it does not heel beyond the smaller of the following angles in the final stage of flooding: ( 1 ) 30 degrees.
( 2 ) The angle at which restoration of propulsion and steering, and use of the ballast system is precluded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      10,196,915
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  438,723
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,135,162
<PP&E>                                       1,151,142
<DEPRECIATION>                                 210,520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,693,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          761,840
<BONDS>                                        500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        93,106
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,338,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,693,360
<SALES>                                        439,423
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               439,423
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,213,166
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,124
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,385
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (707,309)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (707,309)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (707,309)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>