alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008255EN.01000801.xml

| 8.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/8

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2008/C 255/08)

| 1. | As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below. |
| --- | --- |

1.

As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Community producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Community producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Community producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), J-79 4/23, B-1049 Brussels (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

| 4. | This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96.









  Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Bed Linen (cotton type) | Pakistan | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 397/2004 (OJ L 66, 4.3.2004, p. 1) as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 695/2006 (OJ L 121, 6.5.2006, p. 14) | 5.3.2009 |

4.

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96.

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Bed Linen (cotton type)

Pakistan

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 397/2004 (OJ L 66, 4.3.2004, p. 1) as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 695/2006 (OJ L 121, 6.5.2006, p. 14)

5.3.2009

---

(1)  OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1.

1

(2)  Fax (32-2) 295 65 05.

2

---
amndmtoptnagrmt Ex 10-3




AMENDING AGREEMENT

To The

OPTION AGREEMENT 







THIS AGREEMENT made effective as of the 24th day of January, 2005




BETWEEN:




PRODUCTION SPECIALTIES CO., INC., a body corporate, incorporated under the laws of the State of California;




(hereafter “Optionor”)




- and -




BAROLA OIL & GAS CO. INC., a body corporate, incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada.




(hereafter “Optionee”)




WHEREAS:




A.     Optionor and Optionee entered into an Option Agreement dated April 1, 2003



B.     On or about September 30, 2004, Optionor and Optionee orally agreed to extend the Option period and Termination Date of the Option Agreement.






C.     The parties now desire to memorize their earlier oral agreement entered.







NOW THEREFORE in consideration of premises and mutual covenants hereinafter set forth and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by each party, the parties agree as follows:



   1.      Paragraph 1 titled “Effective Date and Option Period” is hereby amended and restated in full as follows:




“1.01  This Agreement is effective from the date written above to the date on which the Prospect Wells are ready for drilling or 24 months, whichever occurs first (the “Option Period”)”



   2.      Paragraph 4 titled ‘Exercise of Option” is hereby amended and restated in full as follows:




“4.01 The option shall be exercised, if at all, by the giving on written notice (the “Exercise Notice”) by the Optionee to the Optionor stating of the Optionee’s election to acquire the Subject Interest, including the actual interest percentage to be purchased at any time during the Option Period and for a period ending ten business days following receipt by the Optionee of written notice from the Optionor stating that the wells are ready for drilling or ten business days following the expiry of 24 months from the date of 

 





	 	 	 
	






 

this agreement (collectively the “Termination Date”).  It is and has been understood that in the event a "better offer" is tendered at any time beginning April 1, 2003 


This Amending Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which, including a facsimile copy thereof, shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF this agreement has been executed as of the day and year first above written.




PRODUCTION SPECIALTIES CO., INC.










Per  /s/ Dero Parker

       Dero Parker










BAROLA OIL & GAS CO. INC.










Per   /s/ Henry Starek

         Henry Starek
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2215 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2215

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 140 Merriman Road in Garden City, Michigan, as the ``John J. Shivnen 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHN J. SHIVNEN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 140 Merriman Road in Garden City, Michigan, shall be known 
and designated as the ``John J. Shivnen Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John J. 
Shivnen Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 23, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2215

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 140 Merriman Road in Garden City, Michigan, as the ``John J. Shivnen 
                        Post Office Building''.
```
Editorial Note on Part 199
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 199 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59789, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 199.40 Evaluation, testing and approval of lifesaving appliances and arrangements. ( a ) Each item of lifesaving equipment required by this part to be carried on board the vessel must be approved.
( b ) Each item of lifesaving equipment carried on board the vessel in addition to those required by this part must— ( 1 ) Be approved; or
( 2 ) Be accepted by the cognizant OCMI for use on the vessel.
( c ) The Commandant (CG-ENG) may accept a novel lifesaving appliance or arrangement if it provides a level of safety equivalent to the requirements of this part and the appliance or arrangement— ( 1 ) Is evaluated and tested in accordance with IMO Resolution A.520(13), Code of Practice for the Evaluation, Testing and Acceptance of Prototype Novel Life-saving Appliances and Arrangements; or
( 2 ) Has successfully undergone evaluation and tests that are substantially equivalent to those recommendations.
( d ) During the vessel's construction and when any modification to the lifesaving arrangement is done after construction, a vessel owner must obtain acceptance of lifesaving arrangements from the Commandant (Marine Safety Center).
( e ) The OCMI may accept substitute lifesaving appliances other than those required by this part except for— ( 1 ) Survival craft and rescue boats; and
( 2 ) Survival craft and rescue boat launching and embarkation appliances.
( f ) Acceptance of lifesaving appliances and arrangements will remain in effect unless— ( 1 ) The OCMI deems their condition to be unsatisfactory or unfit for the service intended; or
( 2 ) The OCMI deems the crew's ability to use and assist others in the use of the lifesaving appliances or arrangements to be inadequate.
[CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25313, May 20, 1996, as amended by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49241, Sept. 25, 2009]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BENNY ROBINSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant.

 /

Case No. 2:15-cv-11377

HONORABLE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (document no. 17),

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (document no. 13), AND

GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (document no. 16) 

The Social Security Administration denied Plaintiff Benny Robinson’s application for

disability benefits. Admin. Record, ECF No. 11. After the Social Security Appeals Council

confirmed the decision to deny benefits, Robinson appealed. The Court referred the matter

to Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris and the parties filed cross-motions for summary

judgment. ECF Nos. 13, 16. Magistrate Judge Morris issued a Report and

Recommendation (“Report”) recommending that the Court deny Robinson’s motion and

grant the Commissioner’s motion. Report, ECF No. 17.

Civil Rule 72(b) governs review of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 

De novo review of the magistrate judge’s findings is only required if the parties “serve and

file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations.” Fed. R. Civ.

P. 72(b)(2). Because neither party filed objections, de novo review of the Report's

conclusions is not required. After reviewing the record, the Court finds that the magistrate

judge’s conclusions are factually based and legally sound. Accordingly, the Court will adopt

2:15-cv-11377-SJM-PTM Doc # 19 Filed 05/17/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 355
the Report's findings, deny Robinson's motion for summary judgment, and grant the

Commissioner's motion for summary judgment.

ORDER

WHEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation (document no. 17) is ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (document

no. 13) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment

(document no. 16) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED.

s/Stephen J. Murphy, III 

STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III

United States District Judge

Dated: May 17, 2016

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or

counsel of record on May 17, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Carol Cohron 

Case Manager

2

2:15-cv-11377-SJM-PTM Doc # 19 Filed 05/17/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 356
#### Elizabeth Snyder *v.*Sylvester Snyder and others.

Order denying motion for security affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.
#### § 188.10-3 Approved container.

This term means a container which is properly labeled, marked and approved by DOT for the commodity which it contains.

[CGFR 67-83, 33 FR 1113, Jan. 27, 1968, as amended by CGD 86-033, 53 FR 36026, Sept. 16, 1988]
```

[Federal Register: January 28, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 18)]
[Notices]               
[Page 4526]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28ja10-24]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

 
Bureau for Democracy, Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance; 
Office of Food for Peace; Announcement of FFP Response to Zimbabwe 
Country Specific Guidance Comments; Notice

    Pursuant to the Food for Peace Act of 2008, notice is hereby given 
that the FFP Response to Zimbabwe Country Specific Guidance Comments 
will be available to interested parties for general viewing.
    For individuals who wish to review, the FFP Response to Zimbabwe 
Country Specific Guidance Comments will be available via the Food for 
Peace Web site: http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/humanitarian_assistance/ffp/zimbab.html on or about February 2, 2010. Interested 
parties can also receive a copy of the FFP Response to Zimbabwe Country 
Specific Guidance Comments by contacting the Office of Food for Peace, 
U.S. Agency for International Development, RRB 7.06-152, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20523-7600.

Juli Majernik,
Grants Manager, Policy and Technical Division, Office of Food for 
Peace, Bureau for Democracy, Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-1777 Filed 1-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
#### § 201.78 Petition for leave to intervene.

A petition for leave to intervene may be filed in any proceeding before the Administration. The petition will be granted by the presiding officer if the proposed intervenor establishes that it has a substantial interest in the proceeding and will not unduly broaden the issues therein or unduly delay the proceeding. All such petitions shall be filed prior to the opening of the prehearing conference, or if none is held, before the commencement of hearing, unless petitioner shows good cause for allowing the petition at a later time. Intervention petitions shall be served in the same manner as other petitions, and shall be subject to answer. Intervention petitions will be granted where necessary to protect substantial interests of the petitioner and where intervention will not materially broaden the issues. A person granted permission to intervene becomes a party to the proceeding.
#### § 174.010 Specific applicability.

Each barge that carries cargo above the weather deck must comply with this subpart.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 5 (Tuesday, January 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-23]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS


Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 18 January 2007, at 10 a.m. in the Commission's offices at the 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion affecting the 
appearance of Washington, DC, may include buildings, parks and 
memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: http://www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding 
the agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address or call 202-504-2200. Individuals requiring sign 
language interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact the 
Secretary at least 10 days before the meeting.

    Dated in Washington, DC, 28 December 2006.
Thomas Luebke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-23 Filed 1-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
Order entered November 26 , 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00958

- CV

LAKEITH AMIR

- SHARIF, Appellant

V.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY & PROTECTIVE SERVICES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Co urt

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 09

- 7655



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 21, 2014 objection to panel members.

Appellant’s motion is DENIED as moot.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
October25, 2012 

### A.L Muldoon Transportation IndustryAnalyst Office Aviation Analysis U.S. Department 

### ofTransportation

RE: Essential Air Service at Fort Wood



### Dear Mr.

Thank you 

### to theJoint Adv1sory Board to comment on the Essential Air Service submitted for air service atthe Waynesville-St. Robert Regional Airport at Forney located on Fort Leonard Wood. As the civilian sponsors the existingjoint use agreement on Fort Wood, the continuance ofviable air service from the Fort Leonard Wood region is of prime concern to the cities Waynesville and St. Robert our regional neighbors. Ourcommitment to ;:1ir service 

### to our communities 

### led to a unique partnership between the 

### cities ofWaynesville, 

### St. Robert and t-ort Leonard Wood which the format1on of Joint Airport Board.
on a Airport Board unanimously 

### D.B.A. lape 

### Air. This board agreement 

### with Cape Air as the 

### pn·::sentations interested airlines, 

### the Joint the service submitted 

### by Hyannis Air Service like to see the implementation ofa 4 

### year Essential Air Service

31rline. As 

### part ofthis recommendation, want to state thatwe 

### rurrently pleased with the service that Capt> Air providesto our comm and their conspicuous 

### edgerness to involvedwith community functions have been able to steadilv increa:>e through an aggressive marketing model and a willingness to address 

### posed on aJoint Use airfield. 

### On behalfofthe 

### and St. thank you foryour continued supportofthe Essential Air Service program, Please feel free to contact us 

### ifyou have any questions or 

### further input.

# Since~ely,L_ 

# 'f,P/i Tim 

### Mann Chairman, Waynesville St. Robert Regional Airport JointAdvisory Board.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

ADAM KNOLL , Petitioner ,

v.
STATE OF FLORIDA , Respondent

.
No

. 4D2 2

- 2 710
[ March 16, 2023 ]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeen th Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ernest A. Kollra, Jr. , Judge ; L.T. Case No s

. 04

- 1508 1CF 1 0A, 04

- 16178CF10A

. Adam Knoll , Miami , pro se

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Picard , Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee

.
P ER C URIAM

. Affirmed

.
G ROSS , D AMOORGIAN and Forst , J J ., concur.

* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

The defendant remaining for trial, Chaka Castro, has been charged in a Second Superseding 

Indictment with, among other things, participating in a RICO conspiracy to commit a series of 

home robberies and aiding and abetting the use of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence. (See 

R. 96.) 

After several adjournments, the parties were ready once again to start trial on March 11, 

2019. But one week prior, on March 4, 2019, one of the three Government lawyers on the trial 

team learned that her father had passed away. A few days later, she resigned from the trial team 

that she had been a part of for four years. And the Government then filed an Emergency Motion 

to Continue Trial for 90 days. 

For the reasons stated more fully on the record on March 18, 2019 during the Court’s oral 

ruling, the Government’s motion is GRANTED IN PART. The trial is hereby rescheduled for May 

7, 2019 at 8:30 am. The joint jury instructions and verdict form shall be submitted no later than 

April 22, 2019 and exhibit binders by April 30, 2019. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 

v. 

 

CHAKA CASTRO, D-1, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 15-cr-20200 

Honorable Laurie J. Michelson 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART GOVERNMENT’S EMERGENCY MOTION TO 

CONTINUE TRIAL [318] AND GRANTING MOTION IN LIMINE TO 

INTRODUCE DEFENDANT’S STATEMENTS [308] 
2 

Also for the reasons set forth in the Government’s motion and the Court’s ruling, the time 

period from March 25, 2019, through May 7, 2019, shall be deemed excludable delay under the 

Speedy Trial Act. The Court finds, specifically in consideration of 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) 

and 3161(h)(7)(B)(i), that the ends of justice served by allowing a more limited continuance 

outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 

It is further ordered for the reasons stated on the record that the Government’s Motion in 

Limine to Allow Government to Introduce Defendant’s Statements (ECF No. 308) is GRANTED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

s/Laurie J. Michelson 

LAURIE J. MICHELSON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Date: March 19, 2019 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record 

on this date, March 19, 2019, using the Electronic Court Filing system. 

s/William Barkholz 

Case Manager
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WANDA FAY OVERTON,

Plaintiff,

vs Case No: 15-11750

Honorable Victoria A. Roberts

CAROLYN COLVIN,, Acting

Commission of Social Security,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

ORDER

On November 5, 2015, Magistrate Judge Stafford issued a Report and

Recommendation [Doc.14], recommending that Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed with

prejudice for failure to prosecute and for lack of merit. Neither party filed objections

within the fourteen day period pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. 

Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice.

Judgment will enter in favor of Defendant.

IT IS ORDERED.

S/Victoria A. Roberts

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

Dated: November 30, 2015

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this

document was served on the attorneys of

record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

November 30, 2015.

S/Linda Vertriest 

Deputy Clerk

2:15-cv-11750-VAR-EAS Doc # 15 Filed 11/30/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 950