Your web browser is not supported You're using Internet Explorer, some features might not work. Please switch to another browser like Chrome, Firefox, or Edge for a better experience.


An official website of the United States government Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Federal Election Commission | United States of America Calendar
           Glossary
          Search
              Search


Menu
      Home
      Campaign finance data
        All data
            Raising
            Spending
            Loans and debts
            Filings and reports
            Candidates
            Committees
            Bulk data
            Campaign finance statistics
        Find elections. Search by state or ZIP code
          Look up contributions from specific individuals
      Help for candidates and committees
        All compliance resources
            Guides
            Forms
            Dates and deadlines
            Trainings
        Learn about electronic filing
          Find and contact your committee's analyst
      Legal resources
        All legal resources
            Advisory opinions
            Enforcement
            Statutes
            Legislation
            Regulations
            Court cases
            Policy and other guidance
        Search across legal resources
          Search guidance documents
      About
        All about the FEC
            News and announcements
            Commission meetings
            Mission and history
            Leadership and structure
            Reports about the FEC
            Careers
            Working with the FEC
            Contact
        Introduction to campaign finance and elections


- Home
- ›
      FEC Record: Litigation
- ›
      Stop Hillary PAC v. FEC (District court 2015)

FEC Record: Litigation*Stop Hillary PAC v. FEC* (District court 2015)December 29, 2015 On December 21, 2015, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia denied plaintiffs Stop Hillary PAC and Dan Backer's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The plaintiffs had sought an interim order enjoining the FEC from taking any action to enforce the naming restriction for unauthorized political committees in section 52 U.S.C. § 30102(e)(4) against plaintiffs throughout the duration of their lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of that provision. The plaintiffs had also sought to enjoin the FEC from enforcing section 30102(e)(4) either facially or as applied to nonconnected political committees with names that clearly and unambiguously oppose a candidate. The court held that the plaintiffs did not show a likelihood of success on the merits of their claims that the naming restrictions for unauthorized political committees in 52 U.S.C. § 30102(e)(4) and 11 CFR 102.14 are a content-based restriction on speech or violate their First Amendment rights. **Background**            The Federal Election Campaign Act (the "Act") states that "any political committee which is not an authorized committee [of a federal candidate]...shall not include the name of any candidate in its name." 52 U.S.C. § 30102(e)(4). Commission regulations further state that any political committee that is not the authorized committee of a candidate shall not include the name of any candidate in its name, which also includes "any name under which a committee conducts activities, such as solicitations or other communications, including a special project name or other designation." 11 CFR 102.14(a). However, Commission regulations state that an unauthorized committee may include the name of a candidate in the title of a special project name or other communication if the title clearly and unambiguously shows opposition to the named candidate. 11 CFR 102.14(b)(3). Plaintiff Stop Hillary PAC is a nonconnected, unauthorized committee that maintains a non-contribution account (Hybrid PAC). Its stated mission is "to engage in political advocacy, make political contributions and expenditures, and organize supporters to help stop Hillary Rodham Clinton from becoming President of the United States." Plaintiff Dan Backer serves as its attorney and treasurer. The committee registered with the FEC on May 16, 2013. After Hillary Rodham Clinton registered as a candidate for president in April 2015, the FEC asked Stop Hillary PAC and Mr. Backer to amend the committee’s Statement of Organization so that its name would not include the name of a federal candidate. Mr. Backer and Stop Hillary PAC refused to change the committee’s name. On September 22, 2015, the plaintiffs filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia challenging the Act and Commission regulations' naming restrictions. On October 6, 2015, the plaintiffs filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction asking the court to prohibit the FEC from taking any action to enforce section 30102(e)(4) against plaintiffs throughout the duration of their lawsuit and from enforcing the political committee naming requirements either facially or as applied to non-connected political committees with names that clearly and unambiguously oppose a candidate. **District court decision**            The court explained that "a party 'seeking a preliminary injunction must establish that 1) he is likely to succeed on the merits; 2) he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief; 3) the balance of the equities tips in his favor; and 4) an injunction is in the public interest.'" The court held that the plaintiffs did not show a likelihood of success on the merits to justify granting the Motion for Preliminary Injunction. In this case, the plaintiffs claimed that a political committee's name is a protected form of political speech, and that the naming restrictions impose a substantial burden on their First Amendment rights without furthering an important or compelling government interest. However, the court held that there was no showing that the Act restricts plaintiffs' speech or that the naming restrictions were enacted because of the content of their speech. The court first recounted the naming restrictions' long history of alleviating "the constant public confusion surrounding [PACs]." The court noted that, prior to the naming restrictions, the name of unauthorized PACs could contain a candidate's name without being authorized or endorsed by that candidate. "The voting public would mistake such unauthorized PACs as a candidate's official authorized PAC, resulting in misdirected campaign contributions and increased voter confusion." The court found that such confusion is still likely and "is exactly why 30102(e)(4)'s mandate why should not be disturbed." The court rejected the plaintiffs' argument that section 30102(e)(4) is content based and subject to strict scrutiny and, citing Citizens United and McConnell, explained that section 30102(e)(4)  "'does not prevent anyone from speaking.'" The court found that, on the contrary, the naming restrictions allow unauthorized PACs "all forms of political speech" by allowing them "[the freedom] to discuss candidates—even by using a candidate's name—throughout their website, solicitations, special projects and various other communications," and even in the titles of their special projects "if the title clearly and unambiguously shows opposition to the named candidate." The court pointed out that the only area where the plaintiffs are not allowed to use a candidate's name is in the official title of the unauthorized PAC. The court found this "narrow and specific" requirement does not prohibit speech but limits potential confusion about which person, group or candidate the PAC represents and ensures transparency. Instead, the court found section 30102(e)(4) requires "exacting" or intermediate scrutiny since it is part of the Act's disclosure regime. The court found the naming restrictions are "tailored to the governmental interest of limiting confusion, fraud and abuse of the political process." "Further, the fact that the government's interest only impedes on Plaintiffs' ability to include a candidate's name in its title alone, further demonstrates that 30102(e)(4) is the least restrictive means of accomplishing the government's interest for transparency in PACs." Given the court's finding that the naming restrictions for unauthorized political committees are disclosure requirements that are substantially related to important government interests, the court found the plaintiffs unable to satisfy the first prong required for a preliminary injunction. The court also briefly noted that, in light of the fact that the requirements only require plaintiff Stop Hillary PAC to change its official committee name, it was not convinced that plaintiffs would suffer irreparable harm if the Motion is not granted or that the balance of hardships tips in the plaintiffs' favor. The court noted that, despite having to change the PAC's name, the plaintiffs are afforded, under the statute, "the unique ability to retain their official website, Facebook, and Twitter page." Finally, the court noted that, with the election approaching, "it is not in the public's interest to upend a statute that was created for the very purpose of ensuring the public are clearly informed." **Resources:** *Stop Hillary PAC v. FEC*litigation page            *Record*article: Pursuing America's Greatness v. FEC (District Court)


Read next: Commission recommends legislative changes to Congress
 Related: Explore campaign finance data »


This information is not intended to replace the law or to change its meaning, nor does this information create or confer any rights for or on any person or bind the Federal Election Commission or the public. The reader is encouraged also to consult the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (52 U.S.C. 30101 et seq.), Commission regulations (Title 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations), Commission advisory opinions and applicable court decisions.


About
          Careers
          Press
          Contact
   Privacy and security policy
          Plain language
          Accessibility statement
          Strategy, budget and performance
 No FEAR Act
          Open government
          Protected Voices
          USA.gov
          Inspector General
 FOIA
          OpenFEC API
          GitHub repository
          Release notes
          FEC.gov status


Federal Election Commission
 The FEC's Twitter page
            The FEC's YouTube page Sign up for FECMail
 This information is produced and disseminated at U.S. taxpayer expense.


Hide glossary Glossary Search terms