alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

TERRENCE BANKS, 

 Petitioner, 

v 

GEORGE STEPHENSON, 

 Respondent. 

 /

No. 2:14-cv-13566

HON. LAURIE J. MICHELSON 

MAG. R. STEVEN WHALEN 

 

ORDER 

 This case involves a habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The 

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit having issued an order vacating in part this 

Court’s earlier order and remanding the case to this Court, Banks v. Stephenson, No. 17-1894, 

(6th Cir. Jan. 3, 2019), with “directions to grant habeas relief limited to vacating Banks’s 

conviction for assault with intent to do great bodily harm,” 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that habeas relief is GRANTED to the limited degree 

detailed by the Sixth Circuit and this case is REMANDED to the Third Circuit Court, Wayne 

County, Michigan, for further proceedings consistent with the Sixth Circuit’s order, Banks v. 

Stephenson, No. 17-1894, (6th Cir. Jan. 3, 2019). 

s/Laurie J. Michelson 

LAURIE J. MICHELSON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Date: February 25, 2019 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record 

and/or pro se parties on this date, February 25, 2019, using the Electronic Court Filing system 

and/or first-class U.S. mail. 

s/William Barkholz 

Case Manager
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,979,828
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         158,350
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               900,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 19,623,434
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     87,900,409
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,253,489
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             115,167,629
<DEPOSITS>                                  90,763,620
<SHORT-TERM>                                13,930,426
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            696,468
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,585,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,871,211
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,679,096)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             115,167,629
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,016,580
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              857,854
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               116,129
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,990,563
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,255,019
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,773,211
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,217,352
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  408,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,527,066
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (426,511)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   (426,511)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (426,511)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.36)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.56
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             (852,000)
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    7,011
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          (1,253,489)
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                       (1,253,489)
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-6, PageID.368 Filed 04/07/15 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-6, PageID.369 Filed 04/07/15 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-6, PageID.370 Filed 04/07/15 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16-6, PageID.371 Filed 04/07/15 Page 4 of 4
#### Charles White and Michael McEvoy, *Respondents, v.*J. Brander Matthews, *Appellant*.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event unless plaintiffs, within twenty days, stipulate to reduce the judgment as indicated in opinion, in which case judgment affirmed without costs to either party. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.042-3 Construction. ( a ) The trackways of the skids shall be constructed of 6′′ × 31 ⁄ 2′′ × 1 ⁄ 2′′ structural angles, or of material of approved shape and equivalent strength, inclined approximately 60 degrees from the horizontal. The trackways shall be spaced 8′-4′′ from the inside of the 31 ⁄ 2′′ vertical leg of one trackway angle to the inside of the 31 ⁄ 2′′ vertical leg of the other trackway angle. The inside of the 6′′ leg of the trackway angles shall form the skid surface for the life raft. The trackways shall be supported by a substantial structure suitable for stowing a Type A life raft at a 60-degree angle without having the raft project over the side of the vessel.
( b ) The lower end of the life raft shall be supported by a base plate so arranged as to permit launching of the raft by a quick release assembly.
( c ) All bearing surfaces of the quick release mechanism shall be constructed of non-corrosive metal. Alemite fittings shall be provided to insure positive lubrication of all bearing surfaces.
Order entered May 6 , 2020

In The



### Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 01307

- CR

JOHN FRANCIS KENNEDY

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 59th Jud icial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 069725

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s May 1, 2020 second motion to extend the

time to file appellant’s brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appell ant’s

brief filed on or before May 8, 2020

.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1A

                       REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements
of AXENT Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1998,
and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998, which
financial statements are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have
also audited the financial statement schedule listed in Item 14 herein.

     In our opinion, this financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in
all material respects, the information required to be included herein.



                                               PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


Washington, D.C.
January 26, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PLANET HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE TWENTY-SIX
WEEKS ENDED JUNE 29, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1997
<CASH>                                          40,416
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,891
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     22,392
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               113,761
<PP&E>                                         326,036
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,621
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 463,462
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,718
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,086
<OTHER-SE>                                     358,025
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   463,462
<SALES>                                        216,583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               223,539
<CGS>                                           58,578
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  187,094
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (5,450)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,021)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,916
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,094
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,822
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25<F1>
<FN>
<F1>RESTATED PURSUANT TO SEC REGULATION S-K, ITEM 601, TO CONFORM TO
SFAS NO. 128. "EPS-PRIMARY" DENOTES BASIC EPS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

168) IV-C-135 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:21:00 AM Sheet 168 of 232 
. gj^ 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

*X-*fiK-~ T&-C--/3LS 

OCT 1 I 1988 

Mr. Jira J, toztsi, Director 

Multinational 8u9iue*-s Servicas, Inc. 

11 Dupont Circla 

Washington, SC 2003ft 

Oaar «c . TOSSIIJ 

X am writing in response to the ceaaents you provided io 

your lette r of S«?pt«®b«t 22, 1988 concerning ©or proposal to 

require onboard roluslinq controls ia new gafloUne-fttelad 

v-ahlcl<is an-4 trucks. As you know, osona non-attaimaant is 

currently thia country's soat praasine. air •gaa.lity profolasu Wa 

nave and will continue to parlors* a t no rough and objective 

analysis of the options available to ua to control atftiasiena 

contr tout ino. to tha osona problaai. "Shile ** do not naceasarily 

agrea vith some of your stated positions on thi a tseaa, ve 

appreciate your input an4 vil l ba farte r conaidering tha 

points you raised as w« devalop a Final aula. Again, than* yoa 

tor vour cot-saents. 

Sincerely yours, 

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY" * 

RICHARD D. WILSON 

Hichard D. Wilson 

Director, Qlxice of Mobile Sources 

c c j Docket A-87-11 

Docket A-85-2 1 

4 ^ ^ 

: * ^ 

<&
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

_______________________________

MARY ANN MCBRIDE, et al., )

 )

Plaintiffs, )

 ) Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-11222

v. )

 ) Hon. Sean F. Cox

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT ) Mag. David R. Grand

OF CORRECTIONS, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

______________________________ )

INDEX OF EXHIBITS

Exhibit Description

AAAA. Exhibit G.1 to Richard Ray’s Expert Report

BBBB. MDOC Policy Directive for Prisoner Telephone Use (Effective 

January 1, 2009)

CCCC. Settlement Agreement in Jarboe, et al v. Maryland Department 

of Public Safety and Correctional Services (DPSCS), et al, U.S. 

District Court of Maryland Case No. 1:12-cv-00572-ELH

DDDD. Settlement Agreement Between Defendants the Commonwealth 

of Kentucky et al. and Plaintiffs Oscar Adams and Michael 

Knights (May 18, 2015)

EEEE. Settlement Agreement Between the United States of America 

and Nueces County, Texas Under the Americans with 

Disabilities Act (January 30, 2015)

FFFF. Settlement Agreement Between the United States of America 

and Merced County, California Under the Americans with 

Disabilities Act (July 20, 2015)

Case 2:15-cv-11222-SFC-DRG ECF No. 89-1, PageID.3768 Filed 05/05/17 Page 1 of 2
2

GGGG. Settlement Agreement Between the United States of America 

and Pennington County, South Dakota Under the Americans 

with Disabilities Act (June 1, 2015)

HHHH. Excerpts from MDOC Prisoner Medical Records (filed under

seal)

IIII. Grievance URF-13-10-3091-28E

JJJJ. Grievance WHV-13-04-1591-12D1

KKKK. Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ First Set of Requests for 

Production of Documents (November 13, 2015)

Case 2:15-cv-11222-SFC-DRG ECF No. 89-1, PageID.3769 Filed 05/05/17 Page 2 of 2
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

LOG OF MEETING

SUBJECT: Meeting of ASTM F15.21 Sling Carrier Subcommittee

DATE OF MEETING: 17 December 2014

LOG ENTRY SOURCE: Hope E.J. Nesteruk, ESHF

DATE OF LOG ENTRY: 31 December 2014

LOCATION: Rockville, MD (phone)

CPSC ATTENDEE(S): Hope Nesteruk, Tim Smith, Max Sanborn, Barbara 

Little

NON-CPSC ATTENDEE(S): Rochelle Price, Sling Rings; Lisa Trofe, JPMA; 

Cory Campbell, DECA, Inc.; Susan Gmeiner, Maya Wrap; Sean Oberle, 

Product Safety Letter.

SUMMARY OF MEETING:

The meeting was called to discuss options for modifying the test torso that is specified in 

F2907. The task group discussed the “BOB” torso that is used in the F2236 versus 

specifying the exterior surface of the torso currently used in F2907. After discussions, 

the task group arrived at covering the existing torso with fabric, such as the fabric 

specified in to close test crash test dummies in FMVSS 213.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 91 (Friday, May 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2326]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR


Committee Establishment: United States Geological Survey--Climate 
Change Science Program Committee for Synthesis and Assessment Product 
1.2: Past Climate Variability and Change in the Arctic and at High 
Latitudes

AGENCY: U.S. Geological Survey, Interior.

ACTION:  Establishment of a Federal Advisory Committee

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is published in accordance with Section 9(a) of 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (Pub. L. 92-463). Following 
consultation with the General Services Administration, notice is hereby 
given that the Secretary of the Interior has established the U.S. 
Geological Survey--Climate Change Science Program Committee for 
Synthesis and Assessment Product 1.2: Past Climate Variability and 
Change in the Arctic and at High Latitudes.
    The Climate Change Science Program (CCSP), a consortium of Federal 
agencies performing climate science, has established a synthesis and 
assessment (S&A) program as a part of its Strategic Plan. There are 21 
S&A products to be administered by 13 Federal agencies over a 5-year 
period. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), a participant in the CCSP, 
is responsible for three S&A products. S&A product 1.2: Past Climate 
Variability and Change in the Arctic and at High Latitudes is the 
subject of this proposed Federal Advisory Committee.
    The primary function of the Committee is to synthesize and assess 
the state of knowledge on past climate variability at high latitudes 
and communicate this information to the USGS. Committee members will 
meet and discuss issues relating to the study design, research 
methodology, data sources and quality, and study findings. The 
Committee will draft a report that will serve as the CCSP definitive 
document on current knowledge pertaining to the topic of past climate 
variability at high latitudes. Membership will consist of non-Federal 
scientists who are recognized as experts in the climate science 
community.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joan J. Fitzpatrick, U.S. Geological 
Survey, Box 25046, Denver Federal Center, MS-980, Denver, Colorado 
80225-0046 (Phone Number: 303-236-7881).

    Dated: May 1, 2007.
Dirk Kempthorne,
Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 07-2326 Filed 5-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4311-AM-M
**Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2012 —
Notermans v Boddenberg

(Case C-114/11)**

Articles 18 EC and 39 EC — Motor vehicles — Use in one Member State of a private motor vehicle registered in another Member State — That vehicle taxed in the first Member State on its first use on the national road network — Vehicle taken at the time of moving to the first Member State and used for both private use and for going to the place of
work situated in the second Member State

Freedom of movement for persons — Workers — Equal treatment — Worker employed in one Member State and having transferred his residence to another Member State (Art. 39 EC) (see para.
33, operative part)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Interpretation of Articles 18 EC and 39 EC (now Articles 21 TFEU and 45 TFEU) — National rules requiring payment of a registration tax on the first use of a vehicle on the national road network — Liability to that tax of a person who has transferred residence from another Member State, is a national of that Member State and uses, on a permanent basis, a vehicle registered there, and included in the transfer of residence, for purposes of private and work-related use involving work-related travel to that other Member State. |

**Operative part**

Article 39 EC must be interpreted as not precluding legislation of a Member State that requires its residents who have moved
from another Member State and have brought with them a vehicle registered in that latter Member State, on the first use of
that vehicle on the national road network, to pay a tax normally due on the registration of a vehicle in the first Member
State, when that vehicle is essentially used permanently in the territory of that first Member State, even if that use includes
journeys by those residents to their place of work in the second Member State.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

July 20, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Goodyear

FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on January 31, 2011 between Goodyear, DOT, and

EPA and included the following individuals:

Goodyear: Sim Ford, Richard Scavuzzo

DOT: Lixin Zhao

EPA: Jeff Cherry, Joseph Bachman, and Angela Cullen

The discussion focused on sharing information related to the following:

 Speed limited tires

 Tire development process
§ 90.32 Review of agency policies and administrative practices. ( a ) Each agency shall conduct a review of age distinctions it imposes on its recipients by regulations, policies, and administrative practices. The purpose of this review is to identify how age distinctions are used by each Federal agency and whether those age distinctions are permissible under the Act and implementing regulations.
( b ) No later than 12 months from the date the agency published its final regulations, the agency shall publish, for public comment, a report in the Federal Register containing: ( 1 ) The results of the review conducted under paragraph (a) of this section;
( 2 ) A list of the age distinctions contained in regulations which are to be continued;
( 3 ) The justification under the requirements of the Act and these regulations for each age distinction to be continued;
( 4 ) A list of the age distinctions not contained in regulations but which will be adopted by regulation under the Administrative Procedure Act using the notice and comment procedures specified in 5 U.S.C. 553; and
( 5 ) A list of the age distinctions to be eliminated.
( c ) Beginning with the effective date of an agency's final regulations, the agency may not impose a new age distinction unless the age distinction is adopted by regulation under the Administrative Procedure Act using the notice and comment procedures specified in 5 U.S.C. 553.
( d ) Beginning 12 months after the publication of its age discrimination regulations, an agency may not continue an existing age distinction, unless the age distinction has already been adopted by regulation or is adopted by regulation under the Administrative Procedure Act using the notice and comment procedures specified in 5 U.S.C. 553.
§ 184.510 Recommended emergency broadcast instructions. The following emergency broadcast instructions, when placed on a placard, will satisfy the requirement contained in § 184.506 for an emergency broadcast placard: ( a ) Emergency Broadcast Instructions. ( 1 ) Make sure your radiotelephone is on.
( 2 ) Select 156.8 MHz (channel 16 VHF) or 2182 kHz. (Channel 16 VHF and 2182 kHz on SSB are for emergency and calling purposes only.)
( 3 ) Press microphone button and, speaking slowly—clearly—calmly, say: ( i ) “MAYDAY—MAYDAY—MAYDAY” for situations involving Immediate Danger to Life and Property; or
( ii ) “PAN—PAN—PAN” for urgent situations where there is No Immediate Danger to Life or Property.
( 4 ) Say: “THIS IS (INSERT VESSEL'S NAME), (INSERT VESSEL'S NAME), (INSERT VESSEL'S NAME), (INSERT VESSEL'S CALL SIGN), OVER.”
( 5 ) Release the microphone button briefly and listen for acknowledgment. If no one answers, repeat steps 3 & 4.
( 6 ) If there is no acknowledgment, or if the Coast Guard or another vessel responds, say: “MAYDAY” OR “PAN”, (INSERT VESSEL'S NAME).”
( 7 ) DESCRIBE YOUR POSITION using latitude and longitude coordinates, or range and bearing from a known point.
( 8 ) STATE THE NATURE OF THE DISTRESS.
( 9 ) GIVE NUMBER OF PERSONS ABOARD AND THE NATURE OF ANY INJURIES.
( 10 ) ESTIMATE THE PRESENT SEAWORTHINESS OF YOUR VESSEL.
( 11 ) BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR VESSEL: (INSERT LENGTH, COLOR, HULL TYPE, TRIM, MASTS, POWER, ANY ADDITIONAL DISTINGUISHING FEATURES).
( 12 ) Say: “I WILL BE LISTENING ON CHANNEL 16/2182.”
( 13 ) End message by saying: “THIS IS (INSERT VESSEL'S NAME & CALL SIGN).”
( 14 ) If your situation permits, stand by the radio to await further communications with the Coast Guard or another vessel. If no answer, repeat, then try another channel.
( b ) [Reserved]
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 1002, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by USCG-2010-0759, 75 FR 60004, Sept. 29, 2010]
#### § 97.10 What is a consolidated grant?

As used in this part, a *consolidated grant* means a grant award to an insular area, the funds of which are derived from the allocations under two or more of the programs specified in § 97.12.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00149

- CV

D ARRYL H EFFNER

, Appellant

V

.

T IMOTHY H EFFNER

, M ATTHEW

H EFFNER

, AND J ONATHAN H EFFNER

, Appellees §

§

§

§ On Appeal fro m the 235th District

Court

of Cooke County ( CV21

- 00248 )

April 13, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice

Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered tha t the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth