alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012399EN.01002103.xml

| 22.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/21

---

Order of the General Court of 23 October 2012 — Chivas v OHIM — Glencairn Scotch Whisky (CHIVAS LIVE WITH CHIVALRY)

(Case T-180/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Opposition withdrawn - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 399/39

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Chivas Holdings (IP) Ltd (Paisley, Renfrewshire, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Carboni, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Glencairn Scotch Whisky Co. Ltd (Glasgow, United Kingdom) (represented by: K. Lumsdaine, Solicitor)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 January 2011 (Case R 1262/2010-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Glencairn Scotch Whisky Co. Ltd and Chivas Holdings (IP) Ltd.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant and the intervener are each ordered to bear their own costs and to pay half the costs incurred by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant and the intervener are each ordered to bear their own costs and to pay half the costs incurred by the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ C 152, 21.5.2011.

1

---
#### In Re Leonard F. Aldrich's Will.

May Term, 1908.

Present: Rowell, C. J., Tyler, Munson, and Watson, JJ.

Opinion filed July 27, 1908.

*Equity*— Wills—Construction—Necessary *Parties*— Beneficiaries *of Trust Estate*— Municipal *Corporations and Inhabitants Thereof Distinguished.*

Where a wiil made the inhabitants of certain municipalities beneficiaries of a trust estate, those beneficiaries are necessary parties to a bill in equity to construe the will, although the municipal corporations accepted service and appeared by their solicitor; since such corporations are not the same as their respective inhabitants, and do not bear the same relation to the will.

Appeal in Chancery. Heard at the March Term, 1908, Washington County, *Hall,*Chancellor. Bill dismissed. The orator appealed.

This is a bill for the construction of the will of Leonard A. Aldrich, brought by the Aldrich Public Library, a corporation organized under No. 207, Acts 1898, as trustee under said will of certain property thereby given in trust for the purchase of a lot in the city of Barre and the erection and.maintenance thereon of a suitable building “to be occupied and used for a public library for the inhabitants within the limits of” the city of Barre and the town of Barre. The other pertinent facts are stated in the opinion.

*309
      *jEdivard W. Bisbee*for the orator.

*J. Ediuard Carver*for the town of Barre and the city of Barre.

Watson, J.

By the will the inhabitants of both the city of Barre and the town of Barre constitute the *cestuis que trust*of the trust estate of which the orator is trustee, but they are not made parties to the bill and are not before the court. No one was in form made defendant, although the city and town respectively accepted service of the bill, and have appeared by their solicitor. Yet these corporations are not the same as the inhabitants thereof and do not bear the same relation to the will. The *cestuis que trust*have the equitable and ultimate interest to be affected by a decree upon the question presented by the bill. Consequently they are necessary parties. Story Eq. PI. Sec. 207.

The decree will therefore be reversed pro forma and cause remanded that the orator may act as it may be advised.

*Decree reversed pro forma and cause remanded.*
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of and for the period covered by theReport. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  August      10, 2009 | /s/ Gilbert J. Pomar,III                   |
|---------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                  | Gilbert      J. Pomar, III                 |
|                                  | President      and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                  |                                       |
| Date:  August      10, 2009 | /s/ Valerie A. Kendall                     |
|                                  | Valerie      A. Kendall                    |
|                                  | Executive      Vice President              |
|                                  | and      Chief Financial Officer           |

----
Editorial Note on Part 287
Editorial Note: The regulations contained in this part were codified by the Internal Revenue Service in Treasury Decision 6820, 30 FR 6030, Apr. 29, 1965. For text see also 26 CFR part 2.

§ 287.22 Time extensions for expenditure or obligation. ( a ) *Extensions.* The Administration, upon application and a showing of proper circumstances, ( 1 ) may allow an extension of time within which deposits shall be expended or obligated, not to exceed one year, and upon a second application received before the expiration of the first extension, may allow an additional extension not to exceed one year, and
( 2 ) may allow an extension or extensions of time within which five percent of the construction shall have been completed as provided in § 287.21 not to exceed one year in the aggregate, and
( 3 ) may allow any other extensions that may be provided by amendment to the Act.
( b ) *Application required.* A taxpayer seeking an extension of time shall make application therefor, and transmit it with an appropriate statement of the circumstances, including the reasons justifying the requested extension or extensions, and appropriate documents in substantiation of the statement, to the Administration. The Administration will notify the Commissioner of Internal Revenue of any extension granted. In case an application for extension is denied, the taxpayer will be liable for delay as though no application had been made.
###### Editorial Note on Part 164

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 164.019-3 Definitions.

*Acceptance* means certification by the Coast Guard that a component is suitable for use in the manufacture of Coast Guard-approved PFDs.

*Commandant* means the Chief of the Lifesaving and Fire Safety Division, Office of Engineering and Design Standards, U.S. Coast Guard. Address: Commandant (CG-ENG-4), Attn: Lifesaving and Fire Safety Division, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509; telephone 202-372-1392.

*Component manufacturer* means either a component manufacturer or supplier seeking acceptance of a component, or a component manufacturer or supplier who has obtained acceptance of a component.

*Inspector* means a Coast Guard marine inspector, authorized representative of the Coast Guard, or a recognized laboratory representative.

*Non-standard component* means a PFD component which is equivalent in performance to a standard component.

*PFD Type* means the performance type designation as indicated in 33 CFR part 175 and this subchapter.

*Standard component* means a PFD component which complies in all respects with the material, construction, and performance requirements of a subpart of this part or part 160 of this chapter.

*Use Code* means an alphanumeric code assigned by the Commandant (CG-ENG-4) to a PFD component to designate the PFD Type(s) in which it may be used. Assigned Use Codes are listed in table 164.019-3.

| Use code | PFD type acceptable for use |
| --- | --- |
| 1 | I, II, and III. |
| 2 | II and III. |
| 3 | III. |
| 4B | IV (all Ring Buoys). |
| 4BC | IV (Buoyant Cushions). |
| 4RB | IV (Recreational Ring Buoys only). |
| 5 | Wearable Type V (intended use must be specified). |
| 5H | V (Hybrid). |
| 5R | V (Recreational Style). |
| 5SB | V (Sailboard vests). |
| 5WV | V (Work vests). |
| 6 | Special, limited, or restricted use. |
| Suffix A | Adult only. |
| Suffix C | Child only. |

Table 164.019-3

[CGD 84-068, 58 FR 29494, May 20, 1993, as amended by CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50467, Sept. 29, 1995; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50734, Sept. 27, 1996; USCG-2006-25697; 71 FR 55747, Sept. 25, 2006; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49238, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60162, Sept. 30, 2013]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 87 (Monday, May 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 25767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2238]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), announcement is made of a Health Care 
Policy and Research Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting.
    A Special Emphasis Panel is group of experts in fields related to 
health care research who are invited by the Agency for Healthcare 
Research and Quality (AHRQ), and agree to be available, to conduct on 
an as needed basis, scientific reviews of applications for AHRQ 
support. Individual members of the Panel do not attend regularly-
scheduled meetings and do not serve for fixed terms or a long period of 
time. Rather, they are asked to participate in particular review 
meetings which require their type of expertise.
    Substantial segments of the upcoming SEP meeting listed below will 
be closed to the public in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, section 10(d) of 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2 and 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(6). Grant applications for ``Ambulatory Care Patient Safety 
Proactive Risk Assessment (P20),'' are to be reviewed and discussed at 
this meeting. These discussions are likely to reveal personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications. 
This information is exempt from mandatory disclosure under the above-
cited statutes.

    SEP Meeting on: Ambulatory Care Patient Safety Proactive Risk 
Assessment (P20).
    Date: May 21-22, 2007 (Open on May 21 from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. 
and closed for the remainder of the meeting).
    Place: John M. Eisenberg Building, AHRQ Conference Center, 540 
Gaither Road, Rockville, Maryland 20850.
    Contact Person: Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members, 
agenda or minutes of the non-confidential portions of this meeting 
should contact Mrs. Bonnie Campbell, Committee Management Officer, 
Office of Extramural Research, Education and Priority Populations, 
AHRQ, 540 Gaither Road, Room 2038, Rockville, Maryland 20850, 
Telephone (301) 427-1554.
    Agenda items for this meeting are subject to change as 
priorities dictate.

    Dated: April 23, 2007.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. 07-2238 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
```

[111th Congress Public Law 229]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 2483]]

Public Law 111-229
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To increase the flexibility of the Secretary of Housing and Urban 
   Development with respect to the amount of premiums charged for FHA 
        single family housing mortgage insurance, and for other 
            purposes. <<NOTE: Aug. 11, 2010 -  [H.R. 5981]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUMS.

    (a) Flexibility.--Subparagraph (B) of section 203(c)(2) of the 
National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1709(c)(2)(B)) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding clause (i)--
                    (A) by striking ``shall'' and inserting ``may''; and
                    (B) by striking ``0.50 percent'' and inserting ``1.5 
                percent''; and
            (2) in clause (ii), by striking ``shall be in an amount not 
        exceeding 0.55 percent'' and inserting ``may be in an amount not 
        exceeding 1.55 percent''.

    (b) Implementation.--The <<NOTE: Notice. Federal 
Register, publication. 12 USC 1709 note. Effective date.>> Secretary may 
adjust the amount of any initial or annual premium charged pursuant to 
subsection (a) through notice published in the Federal Register or 
mortgagee letter. Such notice or mortgagee letter shall establish the 
effective date of any premium adjustment therein.
SEC. 2. <<NOTE: Deadline.>> CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY.

    The Assistant Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban 
Development who is the Federal Housing Commissioner shall appear before 
the Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs of the Senate and 
the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives 
within 270 days after the enactment

[[Page 124 STAT. 2484]]

of this Act to discuss the finances, including premiums, of the Federal 
Housing Administration.

    Approved August 11, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5981:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            July 30, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 4, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
# C_2008127EN.01000801.xml

| 24.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/8

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant positions given at its meeting of 23 November 2007 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/39.165 — Flat Glass

(2008/C 127/10)

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amount of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amount of the fines.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the increase of the fine to ensure a sufficient deterrent effect. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the increase of the fine to ensure a sufficient deterrent effect.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the reduction of the fines based on the 2002 Leniency Notice. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the reduction of the fines based on the 2002 Leniency Notice.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
Skip to contents

----

 Previous 

Next 
Main Menu 

#  Audits of the Federal Reserve System

The Board of Governors, the Federal Reserve Banks, andthe Federal Reserve System as a whole are all subject to several levelsof audit and review. The Board's financial statements, and itscompliance with laws and regulations affecting those statements, areaudited annually by an outside auditor retained by the Board's Officeof Inspector General. The Office of Inspector General also conductsaudits, reviews, and investigations relating to the Board's programsand operations as well as to Board functions delegated to the ReserveBanks.

The Reserve Banks' financial statements are audited annually byan independent outside auditor retained by the Board of Governors. Inaddition, the Reserve Banks are subject to annual examination by theBoard. As discussed in the chapter "Federal Reserve Banks," theBoard's examination includes a wide range of ongoing oversightactivities conducted on and off site by staff of the Board's Divisionof Reserve Bank Operations and Payment Systems.

Federal Reserve operations are also subject to review by theGovernment Accountability Office.

Return to top 

----

HomeReports to the CongressAccessibilityContact usLast update: December 21, 2007
# C_2011355EN.01003002.xml

| 3.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/30

---

Action brought on 28 September 2011 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-94/11)

2011/C 355/53

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: H. Mannes, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of EPSO to resume open competition EPSO/AD/26/05 and to call the applicant back for a fresh oral test, and annulment of the decision to exclude him from that competition on the ground of his failure to attend that test.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the defendant’s decisions of 11 February and 12 August 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the defendant’s decisions of 11 February and 12 August 2011;

| — | Declare the invitation of 14 January 2011 to the oral test unlawful; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the invitation of 14 January 2011 to the oral test unlawful;

| — | Rule that a mere repeat of the applicant’s test is not appropriate to remedy the fundamental procedural defects found at the time of the applicant’s earlier action; |
| --- | --- |

—

Rule that a mere repeat of the applicant’s test is not appropriate to remedy the fundamental procedural defects found at the time of the applicant’s earlier action;

| — | Rule that the defendant has the power to put the applicant on the reserve list even without a repeat of the test; |
| --- | --- |

—

Rule that the defendant has the power to put the applicant on the reserve list even without a repeat of the test;

| — | Rule that the defendant must adequately compensate the applicant for the disadvantage suffered by reason of the lapse of time and must avoid any discrimination in comparison with the successful candidates; |
| --- | --- |

—

Rule that the defendant must adequately compensate the applicant for the disadvantage suffered by reason of the lapse of time and must avoid any discrimination in comparison with the successful candidates;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings;

| — | As a precaution, an order for judgment in default. |
| --- | --- |

—

As a precaution, an order for judgment in default.

---
§ 190.10-45 Weather deck communications. ( a ) Vertical communication shall be provided between the various weather decks by means of permanent inclined ladders.
Exhibit 32.1




Certification Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002













Securities
and Exchange Commission






450 Fifth
Street, N.W






Washington,
D.C. 20549






Ladies
and Gentlemen:






The
certification set forth below is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”), and with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Raptor Pharmaceutical
Corp. (the “Company”), whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless
of any general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.






Christopher
M. Starr, Ph.D., the Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company and Kim
R. Tsuchimoto, the Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the
Company each certify that:











1.
            this
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act;
      and2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Raptor
      Pharmaceutical Corp.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 14th day
of January, 2010.











By: /s/ Christopher M.
Starr






Christopher
M. Starr, Ph.D.






Chief
Executive Officer and Director













By: /s/ Kim R.
Tsuchimoto






Kim R.
Tsuchimoto






Chief
Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer






(Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
§ 28.275 Acceptance criteria for instructors and course curricula. ( a ) A Fishing Vessel Safety Instructor shall submit a detailed course curriculum that relates directly to the contingencies listed in § 28.270(a), or a letter certifying the use of the “Personal Survival and Emergency Drills Course,” a national standard curriculum, to the cognizant OCMI. This document can be ordered through the U.S. Marine Safety Association (USMSA), 5050 Industrial Road, Farmingdale, NJ 07727; telephone: (732) 751-0102; fax: (732) 751-0508; or e-mail: *usmsa@usmsa.org .* For the criteria of Fishing Vessel Safety Instructor, the following documentation shall be provided to the cognizant OCMI: ( 1 ) Proof of at least 1 year of experience in a marine related field and experience that relates directly to the contingencies listed in § 28.270(a) including— ( i ) Experience as an instructor; or
( ii ) Training received in instructional methods; or
( 2 ) A valid license or officer endorsement issued by the Coast Guard authorizing service as master of uninspected fishing industry vessels and proof of experience that relates directly to the contingencies listed in § 28.270(a) including— ( i ) Experience as an instructor; or
( ii ) Training received in instructional methods; or
( 3 ) A valid license or officer endorsement issued by the Coast Guard authorizing service as a master of inspected vessels of 100 gross tons or more and proof of experience that relates directly to the contingencies listed in § 28.270(a) including— ( i ) Experience as an instructor; or
( ii ) Training received in instructional methods.
( b ) Each OCMI will issue a letter of acceptance to all qualified individuals and will maintain a list of accepted instructors in his/her zone.
( c ) Letters of acceptance shall be valid for a period of 5 years.
( d ) Fishing Vessel Safety Instructors or the organization providing training shall issue documents to Fishing Vessel Drill Conductors upon successful completion of all required training.
[CGD 96-046, 61 FR 57275, Nov. 5, 1996, as amended by CGD 96-046, 62 FR 46677, Sept. 4, 1997; USCG-2001-10224, 66 FR 48619, Sept. 21, 2001; USCG-2004-18884, 69 FR 58344, Sept. 30, 2004; USCG-2008-0906, 73 FR 56509, Sept. 29, 2008; USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11264, Mar. 16, 2009; USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58279, Sept. 29, 2014; USCG-2020-0304, 85 FR 58282, Sept. 18, 2020]