alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 26334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2282]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Red Rock Ranger District, Coconino National Forest, AZ

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Cancellation notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 26, 2007, a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an 
environmental impact statement for an Outfitter and Guide Management 
Plan on the Red Rock Ranger District was published in the Federal 
Register (71 FR 4346-4348). The 2006 NOI is hereby rescinded.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Nagiller, NEPA Coordinator, 
Coconino National Forest, 1824 S. Thompson St., Flagstaff, AZ, 86001, 
telephone (928) 527-3413.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Red Rock Ranger district is currently 
completing an assessment of the special use program. This assessment 
will be used in the future development of a new proposed action for 
management of outfitter and guide permits.

    Dated: April 30, 2007.
Joseph P. Stringer,
Deputy Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 07-2282 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
§ 170.260 Class 2 doors; permissible locations. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, a Class 2 door is permitted only if— ( 1 ) Its sill is above the deepest load line; and
( 2 ) It is not a door described in § 170.265(d).
( b ) If passenger spaces are located below the bulkhead deck, Class 2 doors with sills below the deepest load line may be used if— ( 1 ) The number of watertight doors located below the deepest load line that are used intermittently during operation of the vessel does not exceed two, and;
( 2 ) The doors provide access to or are within spaces containing machinery.
( c ) If no passenger spaces are located below the bulkhead deck, Class 2 doors may be used if the number of watertight doors located below the deepest load line that are used intermittently during operation of the vessel does not exceed five.
( d ) In determining whether Class 2 doors are allowed under paragraph (c) of this section, the watertight doors at the entrance to shaft tunnels need not be counted. If Class 2 doors are allowed under paragraph (c) of this section, the doors at the entrance to shaft tunnels may also be Class 2.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of TorreyPines Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Neil M. Kurtz, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Neil M. Kurtz, M.D.Neil M. Kurtz, M.D. President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


August 12, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
#### § 189.25-5 Application for a Certificate of Inspection.

You must submit a written application for an inspection for certification to the cognizant OCMI. To renew a Certificate of Inspection, you must submit an application at least 30 days before the expiration of the tank vessel's current certificate. You must use Form CG-3752, Application for Inspection of U.S. Vessel, and submit it to the OCMI at, or nearest to, the port where the vessel is located. When renewing a Certificate of Inspection, you must schedule an inspection for certification within the 3 months before the expiration date of the current Certificate of Inspection.

[USCG-1999-4976, 65 FR 6509, Feb. 9, 2000]
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 243 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 243

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require the arbitration of 
     initial contract negotiation disputes, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 2009

   Mr. Gene Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require the arbitration of 
     initial contract negotiation disputes, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Labor Relations First Contract 
Negotiations Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. INITIAL CONTRACT DISPUTES.

    Section 8 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 158) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(h)(1) If, not later than 60 days after the certification of a 
new representative of employees for the purpose of collective 
bargaining, the employer of the employees and the representative have 
not reached a collective bargaining agreement with respect to the terms 
and conditions of employment, the employer and the representative shall 
jointly select a mediator to mediate those issues on which the employer 
and the representative cannot agree.
    ``(2) If the employer and the representative are unable to agree 
upon a mediator, either party may request the Federal Mediation and 
Conciliation Service to select a mediator and the Federal Mediation and 
Conciliation Service shall upon the request select a person to serve as 
mediator.
    ``(3) If, not later than 30 days after the date of the selection of 
a mediator under paragraph (1) or (2), the employer and the 
representative have not reached an agreement, the employer or the 
representative may transfer the matters remaining in controversy to the 
Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service for binding arbitration.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### ALMA MICHELSEN, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM, PLAINTIFF, v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT.

Decided January 16, 1929.

Before Gum. mere, Chief Justice, and Justices Parker and Katzenbach.

For the rule, *Edward A. Markley*and *Charles W. Broadhurst.*

*Contra, Alexander Simpson.*

*118Pee Cukiam.

The present suit is brought under the statute entitled “An act to provide for the recovery of damages in cases where the death of a person is caused by wrongful act, neglect or default.” *(Comp. Stat., p.*1907.)

The plaintiff’s husband, Axel Michelson, while engaged in the service of the Frederick Snare Corporation, was directed by his employer to assist in unloading two carloads of poles, which belonged to it and which had been transported over the defendant’s railroad. While engaged in this work, the poles, by reason of the negligence of the defendant company, fell upon him, so injuring him that he died shortly afterward. The trial of the case resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, the award being $46,800. The present rule was thereupon allowed, and we are now asked to make it absolute upon the sole ground that the verdict is excessive.

The decedent at the time of his death was forty j^ears old, and was earning $57.50 per week; 'that is, approximately $3,000 a year. The interest on the amount awarded at six per cent, would be over $2,800 annually; that is, as much as the earnings of the decedent had he continued in good health permanently, and it be assumed that the expenses incurred for his own maintenance were not less than $200. In other words, the wife and the next of kin, consisting of four children, will have as much annually from the investment of this fund as would have come to them if the husband and father had continued to live, and will, in addition have the total principal of the award. In view of this fact, we consider that the contention of the defendant is entirely justified; in other words, that the verdict is clearly excessive, for the statute referred to limits the amount of the recovery to the pecuniary loss sustained by the widow and next of kin of the decedent.

If the plaintiff will consent to accept a reduction of the award to $25,000, she may enter judgment for that amount. Otherwise the rule to show cause will be made absolute.
# C_2013079EN.01001502.xml

| 16.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2013 — Coin v OHIM — Dynamiki Zoi (Fitcoin)

(Case T-272/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark Fitcoin - Earlier national, Community and international figurative marks coin - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 79/27

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Coin SpA (Venice, Italy) (represented by: P. Perani and G. Ghisletti, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: Ó. Mondéjar Ortuño, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Dynamiki Zoi AE (Athens, Greece)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 February 2011 (Case R 1836/2010-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Coin SpA and Dynamiki Zoi AE.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 21 February 2011 (Case R 1836/2010-2) in so far as it rejected the opposition as regards the ‘Clothing, including footwear and slippers’ in Class 25; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 21 February 2011 (Case R 1836/2010-2) in so far as it rejected the opposition as regards the ‘Clothing, including footwear and slippers’ in Class 25;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay a third of the costs incurred by Coin SpA; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay a third of the costs incurred by Coin SpA;

| 4. | Orders Coin to bear two-thirds of its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Coin to bear two-thirds of its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 226, 30.7.2011.

1

---
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Lyle Berman, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Lakes Entertainment, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant, and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant.’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: December 16, 2005 /s/ Lyle Berman         Lyle Berman    Chief Executive Officer
§ 189.01-15 Temporary certificate. ( a ) If necessary to prevent delay of the vessel, a temporary certificate of inspection, Form CG-854, shall be issued pending the issuance and delivery of the regular certificate of inspection. Such temporary certificate shall be carried in the same manner as the regular certificate and shall in all ways be considered the same as the regular certificate of inspection which it represents.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 12 (Friday, January 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2528]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-194]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; Decision 
to Evaluate a Petition To Designate a Class of Employees at Hanford 
Nuclear Reservation, Richland, WA, To Be Included in the Special 
Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice 
as required by 42 CFR 83.12(e) of a decision to evaluate a petition to 
designate a class of employees at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, 
Richland, Washington, to be included in the Special Exposure Cohort 
under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program 
Act of 2000. The initial proposed definition for the class being 
evaluated, subject to revision as warranted by the evaluation, is as 
follows:
    Facility: Hanford Nuclear Reservation.
    Location: Richland,Washington.
    Job Title and/or Job Duties: All former Dupont production workers 
in the 100 area and the 300 area and all 200 area production workers 
and all guards and construction workers.
    Period of Employment: January 1, 1943 through September 1, 1946 for 
former Dupont production workers in the 100 and 300 areas and December 
1, 1944 through September 1, 1946 for all 200 area production workers 
and all guards and construction workers.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Elliott, Director, Office of 
Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, 
OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). 
Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#06494547554645424528414950"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="abe4e8eaf8ebe8efe885ece4fd">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 12, 2007.
John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 07-194 Filed 1-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending February 11, 2006

|Filer                               | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|WESSAGUSSETT MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY | * 3A1* 3A3    | Application by Wessagussett Mutual Holding Company and Wessagussett Bancorp, Inc., both of Weymouth, Massachusetts, to become a mutual bank holding company and a stock bank holding company, respectively (collectively, the Applicants), by acquiring Weymouth Bank, Weymouth, Massachusetts, pursuant to sections 3(a)(1) and 3(a)(3) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:02/27/2006
|Newspaper:                          | Not available
|Federal Register:                   | 02/27/2006   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, Civil Case 15-10878 

 Hon: John Corbett O’Meara 

v 

 

NINE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED 

SEVENTY-TWO DOLLARS AND 

FORTY-FOUR CENTS ($9,872.44) IN 

U.S. CURRENCY FROM PNC BANK 

ACCOUNT # 4249974239; NINETEEN THOUSAND 

FIVE HUNDRED EIGHTY-NINE DOLLARS 

AND NINETY-SIX CENTS ($19,589.96) IN 

U.S. CURRENCY FROM PNC BANK ACCOUNT 

#4252591423; ONE THOUSAND NINE 

HUNDRED FIFTY-EIGHT DOLLARS AND 

THIRTEEN CENTS ($1,958.13) IN U.S. 

CURRENCY FROM PNC BANK ACCOUNT 

#4256692571; TWO THOUSAND FOUR 

HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS 

($2,425.00) IN U.S. CURRENCY FROM 

PNC BANK ACCOUNT #4272820502; AND 

THIRTY-SIX THOUSAND THREE 

HUNDRED EIGHTEEN DOLLARS 

AND TWENTY-FOUR CENTS 

($36,318.24) IN U.S. CURRENCY FROM 

PNC BANK ACCOUNT #4255376227, 

 

 Defendants in Rem. 

___________________________________________/ 

5:15-cv-10878-JCO-MKM Doc # 13 Filed 05/28/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 61
2 

ORDER STAYING CIVIL FORFEITURE PROCEEDING 

This matter having come before the Court on the Government’s Unopposed 

Motion for Entry of Order Staying Civil Forfeiture Proceeding, and the Court 

being fully advised in the premises; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case shall be stayed until August 27, 

2015. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that after the stay is lifted, the parties shall 

have a reasonable time to conclude discovery and file dispositive motions prior to 

any pretrial or trial proceedings. 

Date: May 28, 2015 s/John Corbett O’Meara 

 United States District Judge 

5:15-cv-10878-JCO-MKM Doc # 13 Filed 05/28/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 62