alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011362EN.01001703.xml

| 10.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 362/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 362/17

---

Action brought on 26 September 2011 — Peek & Cloppenburg v OHIM — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek & Cloppenburg)

(Case T-506/11)

2011/C 362/25

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Peek & Cloppenburg KG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: S. Abrar, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Peek & Cloppenburg (Hamburg, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 February 2011 in Case R 53/2005-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 February 2011 in Case R 53/2005-1;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘Peek & Cloppenburg’ for goods in Class 25

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Peek & Cloppenburg

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: another earlier sign, namely the company name ‘Peek & Cloppenburg’, which is valid in Germany

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 as the use of the subsequent mark ‘Peek & Cloppenburg’ may not be prohibited and there is no right to prohibit use throughout Germany under Paragraph 12 of the Markengesetz (Law on Trade Marks), and infringement of the first part of the first sentence of Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 as the Board of Appeal should have waited for a decision of the German Federal Court of Justice and the res judicata of a judgment in the German proceedings to have the trade mark removed from the register.

Pleas in law:

res judicata

---
EXHIBIT
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”),
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
      Ben
      T. Morris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1. The
      Report
      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      BEN
      T. MORRIS


Ben
      T.
      Morris


Chief
      Executive Officer








November
      8, 2006




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. and will be retained by Sanders Morris Harris
      Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 162

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 162.017-5 Marking.

(a) Each valve shall be legibly marked with the style, type or other designation of the manufacturer, the size, pressure and vacuum setting and name or registered trademark of the manufacturer and Coast Guard approval number. The minimum wording for showing the approval number shall be “USCG/162.017/* *” or “USCG 162.017-* *”.

(b) [Reserved]

[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18908, Dec. 18, 1968, as amended by USCG-2001-10224, 66 FR 48620, Sept. 21, 2001]

###### Footnotes -
  162.017-5

- * Number to be assigned by the Commanding Officer, USCG Marine Safety Center.
Editorial Note on Part 199
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 199 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59789, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 199.60 Communications. ( a ) *Radio lifesaving appliances.* Radio lifesaving appliance installations and arrangements must meet the requirements of 47 CFR part 80.
( b ) *Emergency position indicating radiobeacons (EPIRB) and search and rescue transponders (SART).* Each EPIRB and SART should have the name of the vessel plainly marked or painted on its label, except for EPIRBs or SARTs in an inflatable liferaft or permanently installed in a survival craft.
( c ) *Distress signals.* Each vessel must— ( 1 ) Carry not less than 12 rocket parachute flares approved under approval series 160.136; and
( 2 ) Stow the flares on or near the vessel's navigating bridge.
( d ) *Onboard communications and alarm systems.* Each vessel must meet the requirements for onboard communications between emergency control stations, muster and embarkation stations, and strategic positions on board. Each vessel must also meet the emergency alarm system requirements in subchapter J of this chapter, which must be supplemented by either a public address system or other suitable means of communication.
#### ISABEL M. McGRATH AND WILLIAM A. McGRATH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. OLIVER FRAKE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Decided October 16, 1929.

Before Gummeee, Chief Justice, and Justices Parker and Bodine.

Eor the defendant-appellant, *Applegate, Stevens, Foster, Leonard & Reussille.*

Eor the plaintiffs-appellees, *Cook & Stout.*

Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs recovered judgments against the defendant. The sole ground of appeal is that the trial judge improperly charged the jury with respect to contributory negligence. We think that the trial judge correctly charged the point. *Durant*v. *Palmer,*29 *N. J. L.*544 (at *p.*547).

The judgment will be affirmed.
# C_2014052EN.01001201.xml

| 22.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 December 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France)) — Frédéric Hay v Crédit agricole mutuel de Charente-Maritime et des Deux-Sèvres

(Case C-267/12) (1)

1

(Directive 2000/78/EC - Equal treatment - Collective agreement which restricts a benefit in respect of pay and working conditions to employees who marry - Exclusion of partners entering into a civil solidarity pact - Discrimination based on sexual orientation)

2014/C 52/18

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Frédéric Hay

Applicant:

Defendant: Crédit agricole mutuel de Charente-Maritime et des Deux-Sèvres

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Cour de cassation (France) — Interpretation of Article 2(2)(b) of Council Directive No 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16) — Admissibility of a national collective agreement which reserves an advantage in respect of pay and working conditions to employees who marry and excludes from the benefit of that advantage same-sex partners who have entered into a civil solidarity pact — Discrimination based on sexual orientation — Possibility of justifying indirect discrimination by a legitimate, appropriate and necessary aim.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(2)(a) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation must be interpreted as precluding a provision in a collective agreement, such as the one at issue in the main proceedings, under which an employee who concludes a civil solidarity pact with a person of the same sex is not allowed to obtain the same benefits, such as days of special leave and a salary bonus, as those granted to employees on the occasion of their marriage, where the national rules of the Member State concerned do not allow persons of the same sex to marry, in so far as, in the light of the objective of and the conditions relating to the grant of those benefits, that employee is in a comparable situation to an employee who marries.

---

(1)  OJ C 250, 18.8.2012.

1

---
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending November 19, 2005

|Filer                       | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | End of Comment Period                                  
|--------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------
|ISRAEL SALT INDUSTRIES LTD. | 4c8            | Notice by Bank Hapoalim B.M., Arison Holdings Ltd. and Israel Salt Industries Ltd. all of Tel Aviv, Israel to acquire Investec USA, New York, NY and thereby engage in nonbanking activities pursuant to Sections 225.28(b)(6), (7) and (8) of Regulation Y. | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                  | Not applicable
|Federal Register:           | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
# C_2012138EN.01004007.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/40

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 7 December 2011 — Svitana v Parliament

(Case F-35/11) (1)

(2012/C 138/105)

Language of the case: Slovakian

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 16.7.2011, p. 33.

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****2010 census, quarterly reportto Congress [electronic resource].**
 
SuDoc Number:C 1.99:C 32/

Item Number:0128-A-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000861931
 
2009: AugDec | 2010: FebMay | 2011: Jan
 
March 24, 2020
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending August 5, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
Exhibit
      32.2








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”), as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Rick
      Berry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financialcondition
                  and results of operations of the
                  Company.








/s/
      RICK
      BERRY


Rick
      Berry


Chief
      Financial Officer





August
      8,
      2005




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. and will be retained by Sanders Morris Harris
      Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
EXHIBIT 99


                       INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT


The Board of Directors
Catskill Financial Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial
condition of Catskill Financial Corporation and subsidiary (the Company)
as of September 30, 1996 and 1995, and the related statements of operations,
changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended September 30, 1996. These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial 
statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on
a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well
as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe
that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of Catskill Financial Corporation and subsidiary at September 30,
1996 and 1995, and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30,
1996, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, as
of October 1, 1994 the Company adopted the provisions of the Financial
Accounting Standards Board's Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities"
which changed its method of accounting for investment securities.


                                                      KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                                      Albany, New York

                                                      November 1, 1996
Case 2:14-cv-14907-PDB-EAS   ECF No. 1   filed 12/29/14    PageID.1    Page 1 of 4

Case 2:14-cv-14907-PDB-EAS   ECF No. 1   filed 12/29/14    PageID.2    Page 2 of 4

Case 2:14-cv-14907-PDB-EAS   ECF No. 1   filed 12/29/14    PageID.3    Page 3 of 4

Case 2:14-cv-14907-PDB-EAS   ECF No. 1   filed 12/29/14    PageID.4    Page 4 of 4
Case 2:15-cv-10956-MAG-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.1 Filed 03/12/15 Page 1 of 15
Case 2:15-cv-10956-MAG-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.2 Filed 03/12/15 Page 2 of 15
Case 2:15-cv-10956-MAG-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.3 Filed 03/12/15 Page 3 of 15
Case 2:15-cv-10956-MAG-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.4 Filed 03/12/15 Page 4 of 15
Case 2:15-cv-10956-MAG-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.5 Filed 03/12/15 Page 5 of 15
Case 2:15-cv-10956-MAG-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.6 Filed 03/12/15 Page 6 of 15
Case 2:15-cv-10956-MAG-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.7 Filed 03/12/15 Page 7 of 15
Case 2:15-cv-10956-MAG-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.8 Filed 03/12/15 Page 8 of 15
Case 2:15-cv-10956-MAG-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.9 Filed 03/12/15 Page 9 of 15
Case 2:15-cv-10956-MAG-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.10 Filed 03/12/15 Page 10 of 15
Case 2:15-cv-10956-MAG-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.11 Filed 03/12/15 Page 11 of 15
Case 2:15-cv-10956-MAG-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.12 Filed 03/12/15 Page 12 of 15
Case 2:15-cv-10956-MAG-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.13 Filed 03/12/15 Page 13 of 15
Case 2:15-cv-10956-MAG-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.14 Filed 03/12/15 Page 14 of 15
Case 2:15-cv-10956-MAG-MKM ECF No. 1, PageID.15 Filed 03/12/15 Page 15 of 15
Methyl Bromide Inventory

Values are for the amount of inventory at the end of that year.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2042 

To authorize additional appropriations to the National Institutes of Health 

for research on the early detection of and the reduction of mortality 

rates attributed to breast cancer. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2009 

Mrs. LOWEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To authorize additional appropriations to the National Institutes of Health for research on the early detection of 

and the reduction of mortality rates attributed to breast 

cancer. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Better Screening Test 

5 for Women Act’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2042 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR RE2 SEARCH ON BREAST CANCER BY THE NA3 TIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH. 

4 Subsection (b) of section 402A of the Public Health 

5 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 282a) is amended— 

6 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘OFFICE OF

7 THE DIRECTOR’’ and inserting ‘‘OFFICE OF THE DI8 RECTOR; ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATIONS OF APPRO9 PRIATIONS’’; 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘Of the amount authorized to be 

11 appropriated’’ and inserting the following: 

12 ‘‘(1) OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR.—Of the 

13 amount authorized to be appropriated’’; and 

14 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(2) ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATIONS OF APPRO16 PRIATIONS.— 

17 ‘‘(A) RESEARCH ON BREAST CANCER.— 

18 For the purpose of conducting and supporting 

19 clinical research and related activities under 

20 section 417(c)(1)(B) concerning early detection 

21 and screening methods for breast cancer, there 

22 are authorized to be appropriated $55,000,000 

23 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014. 

24 Such authorization of appropriations is in addi25 tion to any other authorization of appropria26 tions that is available for such purpose. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2042 IH

1 ‘‘(B) RESEARCH ON EFFECTS OF EARLY

2 DETECTION OF BREAST CANCER.—For the pur3 pose of conducting and supporting research and 

4 data collection regarding the link between early 

5 detection of breast cancer and reduction of mor6 tality rates attributed to breast cancer, there 

7 are authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 

8 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014. 

9 Such authorization of appropriations is in addi10 tion to any other authorization of appropria11 tions that is available for such purpose.’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
§ 169.715 Radio. ( a ) Radiotelegraph and radiotelephone installations are required on certain vessels. Details of these requirements and the details of the installations are contained in regulations of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in Title 47, Code of Federal Regulations, part 83.
( b ) A valid certificate issued by the FCC is evidence that the radio installation is in compliance with the requirements of that agency.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the "Form
10-Q") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").

     I, Tracey A. Welsh, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of the Issuer, certify that to my knowledge:

     (i)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

Dated: August 14, 2008

                                        /s/ Tracey A. Welsh
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Tracey A. Welsh
                                        Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
                                        Officer and Treasurer


                                      -36-