alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 197.310 Air compressor system. A compressor used to supply breathing air to a diver must have— ( a ) A volume tank that is— ( 1 ) Built and stamped in accordance with section VIII, division 1 of the ASME Code with— ( i ) A check valve on the inlet side;
( ii ) A pressure gage;
( iii ) A relief valve; and
( iv ) A drain valve; and
( 2 ) Tested after every repair, modification, or alteration to the pressure boundaries as required by § 197.462;
( b ) Intakes that are located away from areas containing exhaust fumes of internal combustion engines or other hazardous contaminants;
( c ) An efficient filtration system; and
( d ) Slow-opening shut-off valves when the maximum allowable working pressure of the system exceeds 500 psig.
# C_2013071EN.01002705.xml

| 9.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/27

---

Order of the General Court of 16 January 2013 — Centre national de la recherche scientifique v Commission

(Case T-167/11) (1)

1

2013/C 71/45

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 145, 14.5.2011.

1

---
# C_2011120EN.01001601.xml

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/16

---

Action brought on 23 February 2011 — Mizuno v OHIM — Golfino (G)

(Case T-101/11)

2011/C 120/37

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mizuno Corp. (Osaka, Japan) (represented by: T. Raab and H. Lauf, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Golfino AG (Glinde, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 December 2010 in Case R 821/2010-1 in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 December 2010 in Case R 821/2010-1 in its entirety;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark containing the letter ‘G’ together with other symbols, for goods in Class 25

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Golfino AG

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the figurative mark containing the letter ‘G’ together with a plus sign, for goods and services in Classes 18, 25 and 35

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was rejected

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was granted and the application was rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and indirectly of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1) as there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2012 - 0039 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM144AD

SBCN SBF100 - 53 - 115, R02 --- 6/21/11 SBCN SBF100 - 53 - 115, R01 --- 6/17/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### § 249.3 Amounts of insurance.

MARAD will inform the owner of each vessel that is subsidized or covered by vessel obligation guarantees, prior to initial placement and at least annually thereafter, of the minimum amount of insurance required to be placed on the vessel.
§ 184.210 Heating equipment. ( a ) Each heater must be so constructed and installed as to prevent contact with combustible materials such as towels and clothing.
( b ) Each electric space heater must be provided with a thermal cutout to prevent overheating.
( c ) Each heater element of an electric space heater must be of an enclosed type, and the element case or jacket must be made of a corrosion resistant material.
§ 179.350 Openings in the side of a vessel below the bulkhead or weather deck. ( a ) On a vessel operating on exposed or partially protected waters, an opening port light is not permitted below the weather deck unless the sill of the port light is at least 760 millimeters (30 inches) above the deepest load waterline.
( b ) A port light must have an inside, hinged dead cover regardless of whether the port light is or is not capable of being opened.
( c ) Except for engine exhausts, each inlet or discharge pipe that penetrates the hull below a line drawn parallel to and at least 150 millimeters (6 inches) above the deepest load waterline must have means to prevent water from entering the vessel if the pipe fractures or otherwise fails.
( d ) A positive action valve or cock that is located as close as possible to the hull is an acceptable means for complying with paragraph (c) of this section.
( e ) If an inlet or discharge pipe is inaccessible, the means for complying with paragraph (c) of this section must be a shut-off valve that is: ( 1 ) Operable from the weather deck or any other accessible location above the bulkhead deck; and
( 2 ) Labeled at the operating point for identity and direction of closing.
( f ) Any connecting device or valve in a hull penetration must not be cast iron.
( g ) Each plug cock in an inlet or discharge pipe must have a means, other than a cotter pin, to prevent its loosening or removal from the body.
EXHIBIT 10.1

        DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATION PAYABLE TO NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS

     Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee of the
Board of Directors of American Express Company, on January 24, 2005, the Board
approved the payment of the following compensation to each non-management
director of the Board in respect of his/her service on the Board:

     o   an annual retainer of $64,000; provided, however, that this amount
         shall be reduced by $16,000 if the Director does not attend at least
         75% of the meetings of the Board and meetings of the committees on
         which the Director serves;

     o   2,225 Share Equivalent Units (SEUs) to be awarded under the 2003
         Share Equivalent Unit Plan for Directors upon the Director's election
         or reelection to the Board at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders;

     o   an annual retainer of $20,000 for the chair of the Audit Committee,
         $15,000 for the chair of the Compensation and Benefits Committee and
         $10,000 for the Directors who chair the other committees of the
         Board;

     o   an annual retainer of $5,000 for each member of the Audit
         Committee; and

     o   reimbursement of customary expenses for attending Board, committee
         and shareholder meetings.

     Pursuant to the Company's Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors and
Advisors, each non-management director may elect to defer receipt of 50% or
100% of the compensation payable to the Director for any given year. In
accordance with the Director's instructions, amounts deferred are credited
either to an account that has a crediting schedule based on the Company's
return on equity (the "ROE-Based Option") or an account linked to the
performance of the Company's common stock (the "Stock-Based Option"). Amounts
deferred for which the Director has chosen the ROE-based Option are credited
or debited with interest equivalents at a rate determined pursuant to a
schedule established under the Company's Pay-for-Performance Deferral Program
for senior management that is based on the reported annual return on equity of
the Company. Amounts deferred for which the Director has chosen the
Stock-Based Option are converted hypothetically into units equivalent to the
shares of the Company's common stock ("SEUs"), determined by dividing the
amount of deferred compensation in each calendar quarter by the average market
price of the Company's common stock for the last ten trading days of the
calendar quarter. Amounts deferred for which the Director has chosen the
Stock-Based Option are also credited with dividend equivalents in the form of
additional SEUs on any dividend payment date.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

 Change in meeting location.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the 11th meeting of the American Health Information Community in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.) The American Health Information Community will advise the Secretary and recommend specific actions to achieve a common interoperability framework for health information technology (IT).

# DATES:

January 23, 2007, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

# NEW ADDRESSES:

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, The G.V. “Sonny” Montgomery Veterans Conference Center, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        visit                         *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic.html.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will include presentations by the Consumer Empowerment, Biosurveillance, Confidentiality, Privacy and Security, and Quality Workgroups on their Recommendations and also a demonstration of prototypes of the Nationwide Health Information Network (NHIN).

                    A Web cast of the Community meeting will be available on the NIH Web site at:                     *http://www.videocast.nih.gov/​.*

If you have special needs for the meeting, please contact (202) 690-7151.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 07-218  Filed 1-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
Amendment No. 5 to the Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. Restated 1988 Nonqualified Stoc



 EXHIBIT 10.27.5 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. FIVE TO THE 
 ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO. RESTATED 1988 NONQUALIFIED 
 STOCK OPTION PLAN 
  
 THIS AMENDMENT NO. FIVE to the ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO. 1988
NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLAN (as restated January 22, 1998), dated January 22, 2004, is made by Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). 
  
 WHEREAS, the Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. 1988 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) was adopted by the
Company’s Board of Directors and approved by the Company’s Stockholders in 1988; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company’s Board of Directors has determined that the Plan should be amended to limit the number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock to be granted under the Plan at less than fair market
value to 500,000 shares over the life the Plan. 
  
 NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and in order to reflect the approval of the Board of Directors of the Company: 
  
 1. Section 6 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 
  
 “The purchase price per share of Common Stock subject to an option shall be fixed by the Committee. In no event shall
options for more than 500,000 shares of Common Stock be granted under the Plan at less than fair market value over the life of the Plan.” 
  
 2. Except as expressly amended and supplemented by this Amendment, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its President and Secretary to
execute this Amendment No. Five to the Restated Plan as of the 22nd day of January, 2004. 
  

			
	 ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ J. Patrick Gallagher, Jr.

	 	 	 J. Patrick Gallagher, Jr.
 President



  

	
	 ATTEST:

	
	 /s/ John C. Rosengren

	 John C. Rosengren
 Secretary
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest R. M. B and G. R. B., children v. Department of Family 

and Protective Services

Appellate case number: 01-14-00495-CV

01-14-00499-CV

Trial court case number: 2013-02934J

Trial court: 313th District Court of Harris County

These are related appeals filed by each of the parents of the minor children. We 

previously granted an extension for the appellant in 01-14-00499-CV until September 8, 2014 to 

file appellant’s brief.

We are now in receipt of a request for extension of time to file appellant’s brief in 01-14-

00495-CV. To the extent possible, we would like for the briefing schedules in each of these 

appeals to remain the same. Therefore, we grant, in part, the request for extension filed on 

September 2, 2014 in cause number 01-14-00495-CV. The deadline for each appellant to file a 

brief in these appeals is now September 12, 2014. Due the 180 day deadline for the Court to 

bring these cases to resolution, no further extensions of the September 12, 2014 deadline will be 

considered.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 4, 2014
# C_2011194EN.01001801.xml

| 2.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/18

---

Action brought on 21 April 2011 — Caventa AG v OHIM — Anson’s Herrenhaus (BERG)

(Case T-225/11)

2011/C 194/29

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant(s): Caventa AG (Rekingen, Switzerland) (represented by: J. Krenzel, lawyer)

Applicant(s):

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Anson’s Herrenhaus KG (Düsseldorf, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 February 2011 in Case R 740/2010-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 February 2011 in Case R 740/2010-1;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Caventa AG.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘BERG’ for goods in Classes 25 and 28 (Application No 7 124 084).

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Anson’s Herrenhaus KG.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Word mark ‘Christian Berg’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 18, 25 and 35 (Community trade mark No 3 383 676), the opposition being directed against registration for goods in Classes 25 and 28.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) since there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks in question.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (Consolidated Version) (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
Submitted on record and briefs December 8, 1995,

reversed and remanded with instructions January 17,1996

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Preston E. Jones, Claimant. Preston E. JONES, *Petitioner, v.*QUIMBY TRUCKING and SAIF Corporation, *Respondents.*

(WCB 91-13579; CA A79747)

909 P2d 895

James L. Edmunson filed the brief for petitioner.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Steve Cotton, Special Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondents.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Hasel-ton, Judges.

DEITS, P. J.

*505DEITS, P. J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board denying his request for a hearing on the ground that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the case. We remand for reconsideration by the Director.

Claimant suffered a compensable injury to his back in 1986. In 1991, his attending physician, Dr. Flanagan, asked SAIF to approve palliative care for claimant. SAIF refused to approve the treatment. Flanagan then requested the medical director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services (Department)1 to approve the treatment. The medical director concluded that the treatment should not be allowed. Claimant then asked the Director of the Department to review the matter. The Director refused to do so on the ground that only the attending physician may request review by the Director. Claimant then requested a hearing before the Board’s hearings division. The referee held that the hearings division did not have jurisdiction over noncom-pensable palliative care disputes and dismissed claimant’s request for hearing. The Board affirmed the referee’s order.

Claimant seeks review of the Board’s order. He first argues that, during the pendency of this petition for judicial review, the pertinent statute was amended to allow a claimant to request the Director to review a dispute involving noncompensable palliative care. ORS 656.245(l)(c)(J). Accordingly, he requests that we remand the case to the Director for reconsideration under the new law.

We agree with claimant’s argument, as does SAIF. The new version of the statutes clearly is applicable here. *Volk v. America West Airlines,*135 Or App 565, 899 P2d 746 (1995). Because claimant was not given the procedural protections to which he is now entitled under the amended statutes, we remand the case to the Board to remand to the Director for reconsideration.

Reversed and remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Board with instructions to remand to the Director for reconsideration.

1

 At that time, the agency was known as the Department of Insurance and Finance.
Exhibit 10.17 

 

**AMENDMENT I**

**TO FLORIDA BUSINESSBANCGROUP, INC.**

**2000 KEY EMPLOYEE STOCK COMPENSATION PROGRAM**

 

At Florida BusinessBancGroup, Inc.’s 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the shareholders approved an amendment to the2000 Key Employee Stock Compensation Program (“Program”). The amendment increased the number of shares reserved for issuance upon the exercise of options from 76,500 to 196,500 shares. Therefore, Article 3 of the General Provisions of theProgram now states: 

 

***Article 3. MaximumNumber of Shares Subject to the Program.*** The maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock available pursuant to the Plans, subject to adjustment as provided in Article 6 hereof, shall be 196,500 shares of Common Stock. If any of theoptions granted under this Program expire or terminate for any reason before they have been exercised in full, the unpurchased shares subject to those expired or terminated options shall again be available for the purposes of the Program.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
2000 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND JUNE 30, 2000 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS OF STUDIO CITY HOLDINGS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          63,445
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          53,312
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,061
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,714,612
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      5,187,411
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,006,220
<PREFERRED>                                      1,383
<COMMON>                                     5,061,077
<OTHER-SE>                                  (9,134,081)<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,714,612
<SALES>                                             50
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               180,312
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             159,090
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (339,352)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (339,352)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (339,352)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.011)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.011)
<FN>
<F1>ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL - 1,392,737, DEFICIT ACCUMULATED DURING DEVELOPMENT
STAGE (3,298,818), LESS SPECIAL DISTRIBUTION TO STOCKHOLDER (NOTE 3) -
(7,226,000), AND TREASURY STOCK - (2,000).
</FN>


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.036-2 Type. ( a ) Handheld rocket-propelled parachute red flare distress signals specified by this subpart shall be of one type which shall consist essentially of a completely self-contained device which can be fired from the hand to provide a rocket-propelled parachute red flare distress signal.
( b ) [Reserved]