alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,992
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,896)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,926
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,497
<PP&E>                                         103,644
<DEPRECIATION>                                (45,686)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 125,232
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,959
<BONDS>                                        131,362
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           21,573
<PREFERRED>                                     23,417
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (88,067)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   125,232
<SALES>                                         49,857
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,857
<CGS>                                           33,843
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,843
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,577
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   301
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,952
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,786
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,634
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,152
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,152
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.78)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1****Exhibit 31.1 Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002****CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**I, Ralph Schmitt, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sipex Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.       /s/ Ralph Schmitt Ralph Schmitt    Chief Executive Officer    March 30, 2007
# F **ourth Court of Appeals**

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 5, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00288

- CV

CHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION D/B/A CHRISTUS SPOHN

HOSPITAL ALICE,

Appellant

v.

Aundria HINOJOSA and Florencio Hinojosa, V, Individually as Wrongful Death Beneficia ries

of Florencio Hinojosa, VI, Deceased and on Behalf of Florencio Hinojosa, VI, deceased,

Appellees

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15

- 07

- 54935

- CV

Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s reply brief is due A ugust 15, 2016. Appellant has filed an unopposed motion

to extend time to file the reply brief by ten days. We GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER

appellant to file the reply brief on or before August 25, 2016.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 5th day of August, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.057-5 Marking. ( a ) *Directions for use.* Each floating orange smoke distress signal shall be plainly and indelibly marked in black lettering not less than 3 mm (1 ⁄ 8 in.) high “Approved for daytime use only”, and in black lettering not less than 5 mm (3 ⁄ 16 in.) high with the word “Directions”. Immediately below shall be similarly marked in black lettering not less than 3 mm (1 ⁄ 8 in.) high in numbered paragraphs, and in simple and easily understood wording, instructions to be followed to make the device operative. Pasted-on labels are not acceptable.
( b ) *Other markings.* ( 1 ) There shall be embossed or die-stamped, in the outer container in figures not less than 5 mm (3 ⁄ 16 in.) high, numbers, indicating the month and year of manufacture, thus: “6-54” indicating June 1954. The outer container shall also be plainly and indelibly marked with the commercial designation of the signal, the words “Floating Orange Smoke Distress Signal (15 minutes)”, name and address of the manufacturer, the Coast Guard Approval No., the service life expiration date (month and year to be entered by the manufacturer), the month and year of manufacture and the lot number.
( 2 ) In addition to any other marking placed on the smallest packing carton or box containing floating orange smoke distress signals, such cartons or boxes shall be plainly and indelibly marked to show the service life expiration date, the month and year of manufacture, and the lot number.
( 3 ) The largest carton or box in which the manufacturer ships signals must be marked with the following or equivalent words: “Keep under cover in a dry place.”
( c ) *Marking of expiration date.* The expiration date must be not more than 42 months from the date of manufacture.
Note:
Compliance with the labeling requirements of this section does not relieve the manufacturer of the responsibility of complying with the label requirements of 15 U.S.C. 1263, the Federal Hazardous Substances Act.
#### Same, *Appellant, v.*Same, *Respondent.*

Order reversed and motion for leave to amend granted, without terms or costs. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
§ 180.68 Distress flares and smoke signals. ( a ) *Oceans, coastwise, limited coastwise, and Great Lakes routes.* A vessel on an oceans, coastwise, limited coastwise, or Great Lakes route must carry— ( 1 ) Six hand red flare distress signals approved in accordance with § 160.021 in subchapter Q of this chapter, or other standard specified by the Commandant, including, but not limited to, approval series 160.121; and
( 2 ) Six hand orange smoke distress signals approved in accordance with § 160.037 in subchapter Q of this chapter, or other standard specified by the Commandant.
( b ) *Lakes, bays, and sounds, and rivers routes.* A vessel on a lakes, bays, and sounds, or rivers route must carry: ( 1 ) Three hand red flare distress signals approved in accordance with § 160.021 in subchapter Q of this chapter, or other standard specified by the Commandant; and
( 2 ) Three hand orange smoke distress signals approved in accordance with § 160.037 in subchapter Q of this chapter, or other standard specified by the Commandant.
( c ) *Substitutions.* ( 1 ) A rocket parachute flare approved in accordance with § 160.036 in subchapter Q of this chapter, or other standard specified by the Commandant may be substituted for any of the hand red flare distress signals required under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section.
( 2 ) One of the following may be substituted for any of the hand orange smoke distress signals required under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section: ( i ) A rocket parachute flare approved in accordance with § 160.036 in subchapter Q of this chapter, or other standard specified by the Commandant.
( ii ) A hand red flare distress signal approved in accordance with § 160.021 in subchapter Q of this chapter, or other standard specified by the Commandant, including, but not limited to, approval series 160.121.
( iii ) A floating orange smoke distress signal approved in accordance with § 160.022 in subchapter Q of this chapter, or other standard specified by the Commandant, including, but not limited to, approval series 160.122.
( d ) *Exemption for vessels on short runs.* A vessel operating on short runs limited to approximately 30 minutes away from the dock is not required to carry distress flares and smoke signals under this section.
( e ) *Stowage.* Each flare carried to meet this section must be stowed in one of the following: ( 1 ) A portable watertight container marked as required by § 185.614 of this chapter, carried at the operating station; or
( 2 ) A pyrotechnic locker secured above the freeboard deck, away from heat, in the vicinity of the operating station.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 975, Jan. 10, 1996; 61 FR 20557, May 7, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51357, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2015-0867, 80 FR 62470, Oct. 16, 2015]
Presidential Documents

20417 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 78 

Tuesday, April 24, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8127 of April 19, 2007 

Small Business Week, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

During Small Business Week, we honor small business owners and workers 

for their important role in ensuring that America remains the economic 

leader of the world. Every day, our Nation’s small businesses help enhance 

the lives of our citizens and lead the way in an economy distinguished 

by low unemployment, sustained job creation, and one of the fastest growth 

rates of any major industrialized nation. 

To help extend our Nation’s prosperity, my Administration is committed 

to continuing the pro-growth economic policies that encourage enterprise 

and make America the best place in the world to do business. Our economy 

has created more than 7 million new jobs since major tax relief was enacted 

in 2003, and we are working to keep taxes low to help small businesses 

continue to expand. We are taking steps to make health care more affordable 

and available for small business owners and employees by encouraging 

Health Savings Accounts, supporting Association Health Plans legislation, 

and proposing a standard tax deduction for health insurance. My Administration is also committed to ensuring that small businesses can compete in 

the global economy. 

By continuing to expand trade, we can open new markets for American 

products, lower prices for consumers, and create better American jobs. 

Small businesses are the lifeblood of cities and towns across the country, 

and we salute small business owners, entrepreneurs, and employees for 

enhancing our communities and expanding opportunities for all. The hard 

work and ingenuity of our Nation’s small business men and women are 

helping to sustain America’s economic strength. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim April 22 through April 

28, 2007, as Small Business Week. I call upon the people of the United 

States to observe this week with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and 

programs that celebrate the accomplishments of small business owners and 

their employees and encourage the development of new small businesses. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRD0
20418 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 24, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this nineteenth day 

of April, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 07–2057 

Filed 4–23–07; 9:29 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRD0GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05477

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 05477\05477_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05477\05477_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

05477\05477_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05477\05477_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05477\05477_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05477\05477_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05477\05477_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05477\05477_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05477\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\05477_ D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05477\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\05477_ MAP-1.bmp Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05477\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\05477_ WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05477\05477_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the financial statements of Globe Manufacturing Corp. for the quarter ended
March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                        3,261
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                40,828
<ALLOWANCES>                                  3,022
<INVENTORY>                                  15,414
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             60,783
<PP&E>                                      169,391
<DEPRECIATION>                               85,766
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              153,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       306,514
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          1
<OTHER-SE>                                (159,049)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                153,900
<SALES>                                      41,480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             41,480
<CGS>                                        28,799
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                38,023
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (186)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            7,487
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,844)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (2,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,844)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0


</TABLE>
§ 197.336 Pressure piping. Piping systems that are not an integral part of the vessel or facility, carrying fluids under pressures exceeding 15 psig must— ( a ) Meet the ANSI Code;
( b ) Have the point of connection to the integral piping system of the vessel or facility clearly marked; and
( c ) Be tested after every repair, modification, or alteration to the pressure boundaries as set forth in § 197.462.
#### Arthur v. Griswold.

*Practice—when action in tort*surmves—severance— *Waiver.*

After judgment in favor of plaintiff against G-. and others, in an action for tort pending an appeal, *G.*died. His executors procured an order substituting them as defendants. The appeal was prosecuted by them, and a judgment ordering a new trial obtained. *Held,*(1) that the action did not abate as to ■ Gt. (2 R. S 448; *Haight*v. *Hay,*19 N. Y. 464); (3) that as the survivors could not, in an action of this nature, be united with the representatives of *G.,*the proper motion would be for a severance of the action *(Union Bank*v. *Mott,*27 N. Y. 633); (3) but under the circumstances the order of substitution would not be vacated on the application of the representatives of Q-.

Appeal by plaintiff from an order at special term, vacating an order substituting Elizabeth H. Griswold and others, executrix, etc., of John A. Griswold, deceased, as defendants, in the place of said testator.

The action was brought by William Arthur against said testator and others, for alleged fraud, etc., for in relation to a corporation. The plaintiff recovered judgment from which defendants appealed. Pending appeal, John A. Griswold died, and his personal representatives procured an order substituting them as defendants. After a new trial had been granted, said personal representatives procured the order appealed from.

*C. A. Hand,*for appellant.

*Wm. C. Holbrook,*for respondents.

Tappen, J.

The points passed upon in the opinion are fully given in the • head-note.

*Order reversed.*
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.520 Special requirements for carbon disulfide. A containment system carrying carbon disulfide must meet the following: ( a ) Each cargo pump must be of the intank type and encased within a cylindrical well that extends from the top of the tank to a point no more than 10 cm (approx. 4 in.) above the bottom of the tank.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) The cargo piping and venting systems must be completely independent of those for other cargo.
( d ) Pressure relief valves must be made of type 304 or 316 stainless steel.
[CGD 73-96, 42 FR 49027, Sept. 26, 1977, as amended by CGD 78-128, 47 FR 21209, May 17, 1982]
<PAGE>

                           CENTRAL FEDERAL CORPORATION
                                  Exhibit 32.2
                           Section 1350 Certifications

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Central Federal Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Therese Ann Liutkus, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: May 14, 2004                   By: /s/ Therese Ann Liutkus
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Therese Ann Liutkus, CPA
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          (Principal Financial Officer)

                                                                             24.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

BEAU DARRELL HEIMER,

Case No. 14-cv-14473

Plaintiff, Hon. Victoria A. Roberts

v.

COMPANION LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER TRANSFERRING VENUE

Beau Darrell Heimer sues Companion Life Insurance Company under ERISA to

enforce an insurance policy.

Venue in a federal question case lies in the district in which any defendant

resides or in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim

occurred. 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). A district court may transfer a case sua sponte pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Carver v. Knox County, 887 F.2d 1287, 1291 (6th Cir.1989).

Section 1404(a) permits a change of venue to any other district where it might have

been brought for the convenience of parties and witnesses as well as in the interest of

justice. 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). A court considering sua sponte transfer of venue should

inform the parties of its considerations and allow the parties an opportunity to be heard

on the matter. Moore v. Rohm & Haas Co., 446 F.3d 643, 647 (6th Cir.2006).

After consulting with the parties counsel, the Court believes that venue is proper

in the Western District of Michigan. The events that give rise to this case transpired in

the Western District of Michigan, and the parties and witnesses are located there.

1

2:14-cv-14473-VAR-MJH Doc # 12 Filed 03/26/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 54
Accordingly, this matter is transferred to the Western District of Michigan

pursuant to § 1406.

IT IS ORDERED.

s/Victoria A. Roberts

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

Dated: March 26, 2015

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this

document was served on the attorneys of record

by electronic means or U.S. Mail on March 26,

2015.

s/Linda Vertriest 

Deputy Clerk

2

2:14-cv-14473-VAR-MJH Doc # 12 Filed 03/26/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 55