alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       6,488,324
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,243,582
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,325,478
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,601,057
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,925,781
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,893,999
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,601,057
<SALES>                                     23,343,111
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,834,260
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            28,080,902
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,912,579)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,912,579)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (670)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Lycos, Inc.:
 
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 333-13715) on Form S-8 of Lycos, Inc. of our report dated August 23, 1997
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Lycos, Inc. as of July 31, 1997
and 1996 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and cash flows for the years ended July 31, 1997 and 1996 and for the
period from Inception (June 1, 1995) to July 31, 1995, which report appears in
the July 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Lycos, Inc.
 
                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
Boston, Massachusetts
August 23, 1997
# C_2014112EN.01003201.xml

| 14.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/32

---

Order of the General Court of 12 February 2014 — Cofra v OHIM — O2 (can do)

(Joined Cases T-162/11 and T-163/11) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 112/42

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cofra Holding (Zug, Switzerland) (represented initially by: K.-U. Jonas and J. Bogatz, and subsequently by M. Viefhues, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by: K. Klüpfel, and subsequently by A. Schifko, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: O2 Holdings Ltd (Slough, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Müller and F. Fottner, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Two actions brought against two decisions of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 January 2011 (Cases R 242/2009-4 and R 246/2009-4), relating to opposition proceedings between ALDEMA AG and O2 Holdings Ltd, on the one hand, and between C&A Mode KG and O2 Holdings Ltd, on the other.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the actions. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the actions.

| 2. | The applicant and the intervener are ordered to pay their own costs and each shall pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant and the intervener are ordered to pay their own costs and each shall pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ C 139, 7.5.2011.

1

---
§ 137.335 Underwater survey in lieu of drydocking. ( a ) This section applies to all towing vessels subject to this subchapter. If a TSMS is applicable to the vessel, the TSMS may include policies and procedures for employing and documenting an underwater survey in lieu of drydocking (UWILD). A vessel is eligible for UWILD if the Coast Guard determines that: ( 1 ) There is no obvious damage or defect in the hull adversely affecting the seaworthiness or fitness for the vessel's route or service;
( 2 ) The vessel has been operated satisfactorily since the last drydocking;
( 3 ) The vessel is less than 15 years of age;
( 4 ) The vessel has a steel or aluminum hull; and
( 5 ) The vessel is fitted with a hull protection system.
( b ) The owner or managing operator must submit an application to the cognizant OCMI at least 90 days before the vessel's next required drydock examination. The application must include: ( 1 ) The procedure for carrying out the underwater survey;
( 2 ) The time and place of the underwater survey;
( 3 ) The method used to accurately determine the diver's or the remotely operated vehicle's location relative to the hull;
( 4 ) The means for examining all through-hull fittings and appurtenances;
( 5 ) The condition of the vessel, including the anticipated draft of the vessel at the time of the survey;
( 6 ) A description of the hull protection system; and
( 7 ) The names and qualifications of all personnel involved in conducting the UWILD.
( c ) If a vessel is 15 years of age or older, the Commandant may approve a UWILD at alternating intervals provided that: ( 1 ) All provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section are complied with, except that the vessel does not need to be less than 15 years of age; and
( 2 ) During the vessel's drydock examination preceding the underwater survey, a complete set of hull gauging was taken which indicated that the vessel was free from hull deterioration.
# C_2016222EN.01003901.xml

| 20.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/39

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 4 May 2016 — Dun v Commission

(Case F-131/11) (1)

((Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Pensions - Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Pension rights acquired, prior to entering the service of the EU, under a national pension scheme - Transfer to the EU pension scheme - Proposal by the AECE concerning the crediting of pensionable years not immediately accepted by the person concerned - New proposal concerning the crediting of pensionable years based on new general implementing provisions - Concept of an act having adverse effect - Manifest inadmissibility - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure))

(2016/C 222/50)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Peter Dun (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: initially, D. de Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and S. Orlandi, lawyers, then D. de Abreu Caldas, J.-N. Louis and S. Orlandi, lawyers, and lastly, J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, D. Martin and J. Baquero Cruz, Agents, then J. Currall and G. Gattinara, Agents, then G. Gattinara, Agent, and lastly, G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision, made on the basis of the PMO’s recalculated proposal, to transfer the applicant’s pension rights acquired prior to entering the service of the Commission.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Peter Dun shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Peter Dun shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 3/3/2012, p. 23.

---
§ 197.320 Diving ladder and stage. ( a ) Each diving ladder must— ( 1 ) Be capable of supporting the weight of at least two divers;
( 2 ) Extend 3 feet below the water surface;
( 3 ) Be firmly in place;
( 4 ) Be available at the dive location for a diver to enter or exit the water unless a diving stage or bell is provided; and
( 5 ) Be— ( i ) Made of corrosion-resistant material; or
( ii ) Protected against and maintained free from injurious corrosion.
( b ) Each diving stage must— ( 1 ) Be capable of supporting the weight of at least two divers;
( 2 ) Have an open-grating platform;
( 3 ) Be available for a diver to enter or exit the water from the dive location and for in-water decompression if the diver is— ( i ) Wearing a heavy-weight diving outfit; or
( ii ) Diving outside the no-decompression limits, except when a bell is provided; and
( 4 ) Be— ( i ) Made of corrosion-resistant material; or
( ii ) Protected against and maintained free from injurious corrosion.
§ 16.401 Employee Assistance Program (EAP). The employer shall provide an Employee Assistance Program (EAP) for all crewmembers. The employer may establish the EAP as a part of its internal personnel services or the employer may contract with an entity that will provide EAP services to a crewmember. Each EAP must include education and training on drug use for crewmembers and the employer's supervisory personnel as provided below: ( a ) *EAP education program:* Each EAP education program must include at least the following elements: display and distribution of informational material; display and distribution of a community service hot-line telephone number for crewmember assistance, and display and distribution of the employer's policy regarding drug and alcohol use in the workplace.
( b ) *EAP training program:* An EAP training program must be conducted for the employer's crewmembers and supervisory personnel. The training program must include at least the following elements: the effects and consequences of drug and alcohol use on personal health, safety, and work environment; the manifestations and behavioral cues that may indicate drug and alcohol use and abuse; and documentation of training given to crewmembers and the employer's supervisory personnel. Supervisory personnel must receive at least 60 minutes of training.
Exhibit 23.02

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the use, in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of IDT Corporation of our report dated October 6, 2011 on our audit of the balance sheet of American Shale Oil, LLC (A Development Stage Company) as of July 31, 2011 and the related statement of operations,
members (deficit) interest and cash flows for the year then ended.



|                          
|--------------------------
|                          
|/s/ Zwick and Banyai, PLLC
|                          
|Zwick and Banyai, PLLC    
|Southfield, Michigan      

October 11, 2011
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of QualMark Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
D. Johnston, President & Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods
                  presented in the Report.

/s/ Charles D. Johnston
------------------------------------
Charles D. Johnston
President & Chief Executive Officer
March 26, 2004

In connection with the Annual Report of QualMark Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony
A. Scalese Chief Financial Officer & Principal Accounting Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods
                  presented in the Report.

/s/ Anthony A. Scalese
-------------------------------------
Anthony A. Scalese
Chief Financial Officer & Principal Accounting Officer
March 26, 2004

A signed original of these written statements required by section 906 have been
provided to QualMark Corporation and will be retained by QualMark Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BRENT MOHLMAN,

Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 15-11085

Honorable Gerald E. Rosen

v. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford

 

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL

TRUST COMPANY, Trustee for

LONG BEACH MORTGAGE

LOAN TRUST 2006-1, 

Defendant. 

__________________________________/

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S SUR-REPLY [R. 18] AND REQUIRING 

PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD 

NOT BE IMPOSED FOR REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF LOCAL RULES

Defendant filed a motion to dismiss on March 31, 2015. [R. 3]. The 

motion is fully briefed – as Plaintiff Brent Mohlman responded [R. 15] and 

Defendant filed a reply brief [R. 17]. The Honorable Gerald E. Rosen 

referred Defendant’s motion to dismiss to this Court for report and 

recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). [R. 11]. 

On June 30, 2015, Mohlman filed a 12-page sur-reply brief without 

leave of Court, in violation of the Local Rules of this District. [R. 18]. The 

Local Rules do not provide a non-moving party the right to file a sur-reply to 

the movant’s reply brief; such a pleading is only permitted by obtaining 

2:15-cv-11085-GER-EAS Doc # 19 Filed 06/30/15 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 641
leave of Court. Furthermore, the text of a reply brief may not exceed seven 

pages. E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(d)(3)(B). Mohlman failed to seek leave of Court 

before filing his sur-reply, and the text of his brief exceeds the page limit. 

Mohlman’s sur-reply [R. 18] is STRICKEN.

This is the third time Mohlman’s counsel has violated the Local Rules 

while briefing Defendant’s motion to dismiss. [See R. 12, 14]. The Court 

previously warned counsel “that any continued failure to comply with the 

Court’s local rules will result in an order to show cause why sanctions 

should not be imposed pursuant to LR 11.1 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c).” [R. 

14, PgID 486]. 

Thus, the Court orders Mohlman’s counsel to show cause in writing 

by July 10, 2015 why sanctions should not be imposed for repeated 

violations of the Local Rules of this District. Counsel must appear for a 

show cause hearing on Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. 

IT IS ORDERED. 

s/Elizabeth A. Stafford

ELIZABETH A. STAFFORD

United States Magistrate Judge

Dated: June 30, 2015

2

2:15-cv-11085-GER-EAS Doc # 19 Filed 06/30/15 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 642
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served 

upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF 

System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses 

disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on June 30, 2015.

s/Marlena Williams 

MARLENA WILLIAMS

Case Manager

3

2:15-cv-11085-GER-EAS Doc # 19 Filed 06/30/15 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 643
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

J AND J SPORTS

PRODUCTIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

METROPOLITAN LIFE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

Case No. 2:14-cv-11694

Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub

Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti

(Settlement)

___________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALLOW 

REPRESENTATIVE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE (DE 54)

This matter is scheduled for a settlement conference on October 14, 2016. 

On October 3, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion to allow its representative, who is

based in California, to appear at the conference by telephone, in order to limit

expences in this potentially cost-shifting case. (DE 54.) On October 6, 2016,

Defendants filed a notice of concurrence in Plaintiff’s motion. (DE 55.) Plaintiff’s

motion is GRANTED as unopposed and in order to limit costs. Plaintiff is

cautioned, however, that the individual appearing by telephone must have complete

settlement authority. Plaintiff’s local counsel must appear in person, although its

national counsel may appear by phone, at his option.

2:14-cv-11694-MKM Doc # 56 Filed 10/07/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 426
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 7, 2016 s/Anthony P. Patti 

Anthony P. Patti

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record

on October 7, 2016, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail.

s/Michael Williams

Case Manager for the 

Honorable Anthony P. Patti

2

2:14-cv-11694-MKM Doc # 56 Filed 10/07/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 427
May 15 , 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MICHAEL JOSEPH SNOWD EN , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00586

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard ON REMAND from the Court of Criminal Appeals on the transcript of the record of the court below. The record reveals no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment be AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Lyle Berman, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Lakes Entertainment, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant, and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: December 16, 2005 /s/ Lyle Berman           Lyle Berman      Chief Executive Officer