alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012319EN.01000901.xml

| 20.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/9

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 September 2012 — Euro-Information v OHIM (EURO AUTOMATIC PAIEMENT)

(Case T-497/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark EURO AUTOMATIC PAIEMENT - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive nature - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 319/15

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Euro-Information — Européenne de traitement de l’information (Strasbourg, France) (represented by: A. Grolée, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 July 2011 (Case No R 370/2011-2), concerning an application to register the word mark EURO AUTOMATIC PAIEMENT as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Euro-Information — Européenne de traitement de l’information to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Euro-Information — Européenne de traitement de l’information to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 370, 17.12.2011.

1

---
|For immediate release
|---------------------



|The Federal Reserve Board on Thursday announced its approval of the applications under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act by the Desjardins Group, Montreal, Canada; Federation des caisses Desjardins du Quebec, Levis, Canada; La Caisse centrale Desjardins du Quebec, Montreal, Canada; and Desjardins FSB Holdings, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware, to become bank holding companies through the conversion of their existing thrift, Desjardins Federal Savings Bank, Hallandale, Florida, to a national bank that would operate as Desjardins Bank, N.A., also in Hallandale.
      Attached is the Board's Order relating to this action.
      Attachment (57 KB PDF)
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2003 Orders on banking applications

---
#### § 169.517 Rescue boat.

All vessels certificated for exposed or partially protected waters service must have a suitable motor rescue boat, except when a motor lifeboat is provided or when, in the opinion of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, the vessel is of such design and operating characteristics that the vessel itself provides a satisfactory man overboard rescue platform.
§ 193.10-1 Application. ( a ) The provisions of this subpart, with the exception of § 193.10-90, shall apply to all vessels contracted for on or after March 1, 1968.
( b ) Vessels contracted for prior to March 1, 1968, shall meet the requirements of § 193.10-90.
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2341 

For the relief of Paul Green. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2009 

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Paul Green. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING APPLICATION 

4 FOR CHILD’S INSURANCE BENEFIT AND 

5 LUMP-SUM DEATH BENEFIT UNDER TITLE II 

6 OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT. 

7 If an application for a child’s insurance benefit under 

8 section 202(d) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 402(d)) is filed by or on behalf of Paul Green of Walnut 

10 Street in Newton, Massachusetts, during the 1-year period 

11 following the date of the enactment of this Act— 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2341 IH

1 (1) the application shall be deemed, for pur2 poses of section 202(d) of such Act, to have been 

3 filed during the month in which his mother, Marie 

4 Pendola Giardina (Social Security account number 

5 000–00–2579), died; and 

6 (2) the application shall be deemed to be an ap7 plication for a lump-sum death benefit under section 

8 202(i) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 402(i)), and for pur9 poses of such section 202(i), to have been filed in 

10 the month during which his mother, Marie Pendola 

11 Giardina, died. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
§ 196.15-1 Application. ( a ) The provisions of this subpart shall apply to all vessels.
§ 171.111 Penetrations and openings in watertight bulkheads in vessels of 100 gross tons or more. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (f) of this section, each opening in a watertight bulkhead must have a means to close it watertight.
( b ) Except in a machinery space, the means for closing each opening may not be by bolted portable plates.
( c ) If a main transverse watertight bulkhead is penetrated, the penetration must be made watertight. Lead or other heat sensitive materials must not be used in a system that penetrates a main transverse watertight bulkhead if fire damage to this system would reduce the watertight integrity of the bulkhead.
( d ) A main transverse watertight bulkhead must not be penetrated by valves or cocks unless they are a part of a piping system.
( e ) If a pipe, scupper, or electric cable passes through a main transverse watertight bulkhead, the opening through which it passes must be watertight.
( f ) A main transverse watertight bulkhead may not have non-watertight penetrations below the bulkhead deck unless— ( 1 ) The margin line is more than 9 inches (23 centimeters) below the bulkhead deck at the intersection of the margin line and the line formed by the intersection of the plane of the main transverse watertight bulkhead and the shell; and
( 2 ) Making all penetrations watertight is impracticable.
( g ) Penetrations approved in accordance with paragraph (f) of this section must comply with the following: ( 1 ) The bottom of the penetration must not be located— ( i ) More than 24 inches (61 centimeters) below the bulkhead deck; nor
( ii ) Less than 9 inches (23 centimeters) above the margin line.
( 2 ) The penetration must not be located outboard from the centerline more than 1 ⁄ 4 of the beam of the vessel measured— ( i ) On the bulkhead deck; and
( ii ) In the vertical plane of the penetration.
( h ) No doors, manholes, or other access openings may be located in a watertight bulkhead that separates two cargo spaces or a cargo space and a permanent or reserve bunker.
# C_2013225EN.01003201.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/32

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 June 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial de Braga — Portugal) — Impacto Azul Lda v BPSA 9 — Promoção e Desenvolvimento de Investimentos Imobiliários SA, Bouygues Imobiliária — SGPS Lda, Bouygues Immobilier SA, Aniceto Fernandes Viegas, Óscar Cabanez Rodriguez

(Case C-186/12) (1)

1

(Freedom of establishment - Restrictions - Joint and several liability of parent companies vis-à-vis the creditors of their subsidiaries - Exclusion of parent companies having their seat in another Member State - No restriction)

2013/C 225/53

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Judicial de Braga

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Impacto Azul Lda

Applicant:

Defendants: BPSA 9 — Promoção e Desenvolvimento de Investimentos Imobiliários SA, Bouygues Imobiliária — SGPS Lda, Bouygues Immobilier SA, Aniceto Fernandes Viegas, Óscar Cabanez Rodriguez

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal Judicial de Braga — Interpretation of Article 49 TFEU — Restrictions on freedom of establishment — National rules excluding the joint and several liability of parent companies vis-à-vis the creditors of their subsidiary companies for those parent companies having their seat in another Member State

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 49 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which excludes the application of the principle of the joint and several liability of parent companies vis-à-vis the creditors of their subsidiaries to parent companies having their seat in the territory of another Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 217, 21.7.2012.

1

---
§ 195.09-5 General. ( a ) All scientific equipment shall be designed to good commercial standards for such appliances, where applicable. Their electrical and pressure connections to the ship's supply shall be designed to marine standards.
( b ) It shall be the responsibility of the owner to assure that the scientific equipment and their electrical or pressure connections to the ship's supply are maintained in such a manner as to be free of personnel hazards which may be caused by shock, temperature extremes, and moving parts.
Exhibit 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of RedHand International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended 3/31/2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Simon
P. Thurlow as President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                                     By /s/ Simon P. Thurlow
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Simon P. Thurlow, President

November 24, 2004
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case Number: 14-cr-20789 

 v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

D-2 DEQUINDRE LEBRANDON 

DONALD, a/k/a D.Q., 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING 

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA 

AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT 

On March 17, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris conducted a plea 

hearing pursuant to Defendant’s consent. The Magistrate Judge issued her report on March 17, 

2015, recommending that this Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty. 

Although the Magistrate Judge’s report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may 

object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, 

neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the 

Magistrate Judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and 

recommendation waives any further right to appeal. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, 

ECF No. 24, is ADOPTED. 

 It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s plea of guilty is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 

Plea Agreement, ECF No. 23, is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT. 

Dated: April 7, 2015 s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

1:14-cr-20789-TLL-PTM Doc # 34 Filed 04/07/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 148
PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on April 7, 2015. 

 s/Karri Sandusky 

 Karri Sandusky, Acting Case Manager 

1:14-cr-20789-TLL-PTM Doc # 34 Filed 04/07/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 149
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE JPM COMPANY

The JPM Company of Delaware, a Delaware corporation
JPM Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Denron, Inc., a California corporation
JPM Cable Assembly PTE, LTD., a Singapore corporation
JPM Czech Republic Spol S.R.O., a Czech Republic corporation
JPM Deutschland GmbH, a Federal Republic of Germany corporation
The JPM Company of Mexico, S.A. de C.V., a Mexico corporation
Electronica Pantera S.A. de C.V., a Mexico corporation
The JPM Company of Canada, a Canada corporation
Antrum Interface 725 Ltd., a Canada corporation
Ulmin S.A., an Uruguay corporation
Datalink Participacoes S/C Ltda., a Brazil corporation
AF Datalink Equipamentos de Telecomunicacoes Ltda., a Brazil corporation
JPM Hong Kong Ltd., a Hong Kong corporation
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Bobby Yazdani, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Saba Software, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certify, as of the date hereof, solely forpurposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company atthe dates and for the periods indicated. 

 

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

 

Date: October 15, 2004
# No. 03-16-00718-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN 

### IN RE VOLKSWAGEN CLEAN DIESEL LITIGATION: TCAA ENFORCEMENT CASE
On Petition for Permissive Interlocutory Appeal from MDL No. 15-0844, pending in the 353rdJudicial District Court Travis County, Texas 

### JEFFERSON COUNTY'S NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL AND DESIGNATION OF LEAD COUNSEL ON APPEAL
TO THE HONORABLE COURT OFAPPEALS: Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 6, Appellee Jefferson County files this Notice of Appearance of Counsel and Designation ofLead Counsel on Appeal as follows: I. Appellee designates the following attorneys as counsel on appeal: KATHLEEN KENNEDY Chief, Civil Division Texas Bar No. 00798314 Jefferson County Criminal District Attorney's Office Jefferson County, Texas I085 Pearl Street, 3rd Floor

Beaumont, Texas 77701

Phone: 409 835 8577

Fax: 409 784 5893 kkennedy @co .jefferson .tx .us

1 ACCEPTED 03-16-00718-CV 13659091 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/8/2016 8:20:20 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKAnthony F. Constant Texas Bar No. 04711000 Special Counsel Constant Law Firm 800 N. Shoreline Blvd., Ste. 2700 South Corpus Christi, TX 78401 Telephone: (361) 698-8000 Telecopier: (361) 887-8010 office@constantlawfirm.com
2. LEAD COUNSEL designation. Pursuant to TEX. R. APP
. P. 6.1, Appellee hereby designates Anthony F. Constant office@constantlawfirm.com as LEAD COUNSEL on appeal. 3. Appellee respectfully requests that the Court and other counsel in this case note this designation and send all further correspondence, orders, or other communications to Anthony F. Constant. Respectfully submitted, By: Isl Anthony F. Constant Anthony F. Constant State Bar No. 04711000 Constant Law Firm

2 800 N. Shoreline Blvd., Ste. 2700 South Corpus Christi, TX 78401 Telephone: (361) 698-8000 Telecopier: (361) 887-8010 office@constantlawfirm.com ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE JEFFERSON COUNTYCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on November 81h a copy ofthe foregoing Notice was served upon all counsel ofrecord registered with the Electronic Filing Service for this matter in compliance with the Texas Rules ofAppellate Procedure.

3 IslAnthony F. Constant Anthony F. Constant office @constantlawfirm
.com
Sec. 19 Ship Repair Summaries. ( a ) Ship Repair Summaries shall be prepared on Form MA-159 by the General Agents and local offices of the Authority covering all work performed under their respective jurisdiction and submitted to the District Ship Repair and Maintenance office involved. The summaries must be properly identified and contain the correct cost breakdown as set forth in this order. If the summary covers work other than repairs related to a voyage, the summary must so state, e.g., reactivation, lay-up, idle status, etc. The District Ship Repair and Maintenance office shall review the summaries and supports to ascertain that they have been properly prepared in all respects. The originals of all summaries unsupported shall be forwarded by the District offices to the Chief, Operating Cost Control Branch, Office of Ship Operations, National Shipping Authority, Washington, DC, and two copies each of all summaries one of which is to be supported by one copy each of job orders, supplemental job orders, invitation for bids, specifications, invoices, itemized prices, completion certificates, ABS invoices and reports, purchase orders, price warehouse delivery tickets, property removal notices, WORKSMALREP Contracts, a statement that bid, performance and payment bonds were received and approved, abstract of bids containing the list of contractors invited to bid and response of each, an explanation of the basis for an award when the contract is not awarded to lowest bidder, listing of scrap, salvageable material and equipment removed from a vessel, etc., shall be forwarded to the Chief, Division of Ship Repair and Maintenance, Washington, DC. ( 1 ) Within 60 days after termination of the respective voyages for work awarded by General Agents.
( 2 ) Within 30 days after completion of all work awarded by the Local Offices within a port area.
( b ) In the event invoices for particular services are not available such as, American Bureau of Venders Inspectors fees, the summary is nevertheless to be prepared as outlined in this order and estimated costs for the missing billings set forth on the summary. Upon receipt of said invoices a supplementary summary shall promptly be prepared and distributed as outlined in this section.
( c ) If no work is performed under a General Agent's jurisdiction for a particular voyage, the General Agent must submit for distribution as stated herein a repair summary stating across the face that no repairs, either foreign or domestic, were performed for the particular voyage involved.
Exhibit 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8,  No.  333-93007  and  333-80097)Talk  Visual  Corporation  1999 Stock
Compensation Plan, as amended,  of our report dated March 30, 2000, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Talk Visual Corporation, included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 1999, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Mayer Rispler & Company,P.C.


Brooklyn, New York
March 30, 2000

                                       57
# C_2012331EN.01002203.xml

| 27.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2012 — Video Research USA, v OHIM (VR)

(Case T-267/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Community figurative mark VR - Failure to apply for renewal of the mark - Cancellation of the mark upon expiry of the registration - Application for restitutio in integrum - Article 81 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

(2012/C 331/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Video Research USA, Inc. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: B. Brandreth, Barrister)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM, of 8 March 2011 (Case R 1187/2010-2), relating to an application for restitutio in integrum.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Video Research USA, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Video Research USA, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 16.7.2011.

---
[No. 3505.]

#### Frantz Stores Co. v. Wright.

1. Fraudulent *Conveyances*— Evidence. A creditor, knowing his debtor to be insolvent, accepts goods in satisfaction of his debt, paying the debtor in money the difference between the amount of the debt and the value of the goods. Such payment is only evidence of a fraudulent intent on his part, and not necessarily conclusive.

2. *Appeals*— Finding *on Sufficient Evidence,*will not be reviewed.

*Appeal from Boulder County Court.*Hon. E. J. Ingram, Judge.

Messrs. Miller, Barnd *&*Williams, for appellant.

Messrs. Hawkins & Downer, Mr. L. O. Hawkins, for appellee.

Cunningham, Judge.

Plaintiff brought its action against John and Nellie Wilson in a justice of the peace court, on a money demand, A writ of attachment was sued *171out, and a levy made thereunder on certain personal property, as the property of John and Nellie Wilson. Wright intervened, claiming title to the goods in virtue of a bill of sale from the Wilsons to himself. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, intervenor, Wright, appealed to the county court, where, on a trial to the court without a jury, he prevailed.

1. It is contended by the appellant thát the sale and transfer of the goods from the Wilsons to Wright was fraudulent, and wholly void as to plaintiff, who was a creditor, and if not wholly void, at least partially void. Wright claimed to be a creditor of the Wilsons, and that he took the goods in payment for a debt they owed him, and paid them a small balance in cash for the goods. Plaintiff contends that even though the debtor may prefer a creditor, that where one creditor takes goods in payment of a debt, and pays a balance in cash, where he knows of the insolvent condition of his creditor, the whole transaction becomes void as to the other creditors. We think this contention is not sound. The payment of the money, under such circumstances, is but evidence of fraud, and not necessarily conclusive of the question.

*Otis v. Rose et*al., Colo. App., 449; 48 Pac. 967.

2. The trial judge, after hearing the evidence, which was conflicting on practically all of the material points, found that there was no fraud in the sale and transfer of the goods by the Wilsons to Wright, and upheld the same.

We can not say, as a matter of law, that the evidence, viewed in the most favorable light to the *172intervenor, is not sufficient to sustain the findings of the trial judge in this behalf, and the judgment based thereon.

*Otis v. Rose et al., supra. First National Bank v. Kavanaugh,*7 Colo. App., 160; 43 Pac., 217. *Roberts v. Larson et al.,*48 Colo., 120; 109 Pac., 261.

There is no law question fairly involved, and the only error discussed is the alleged insufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment.

The judgment will stand affirmed.

*Affirmed.*