alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
New Jersey Department of Labor, Workmen’s Compensation Bureau.

#### STEPHEN SIPOS, PETITIONER, v. C. V. KEIMS SONS, INCORPORATED, RESPONDENT.

* * * *

Petitioner alleges that he sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with respondent on January 20th, 1928, at which time his wages were $50 a week. Petitioner states that while moving a barrel his foot slipped . on the floor and in an effort to save himself from falling he put out his right hand, which struck the floor. He claims that as a result thereof he sustained in. excess of fifteen per cent, of total permanent disability of his right hand. He admits that he did not stop work because of this accident and continued working for six weeks thereafter, at which time his employment was terminated with respondent for reasons which have no bearing whatever on this accident. Shortly after, his employment was terminated he became ill from grippe or something similar which he admits had no connection whatsoever with the said alleged accident and he further admits that any and all results of said illness have no connection whatsoever with said alleged accident. Sometime after March 12th, 1928, he had a tooth removed and admits that that condition or any results therefrom had and have nothing to do with his said alleged accident. He admits that whatever disability there was and is because of said alleged accident is confined solely to his right hand and is advised by the physicians who treated him that said disability in all probability will disappear in time. It is admitted by the petitioner that there was no temporary disability arising out of his alleged accident.

*831Respondent denies that petitioner sustained the accident he alleges or any accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with respondent. Respondent further denies that petitioner sustained any permanent disability from the accident he alleges. Respondent, however, for the purpose of disposing of this case finally and completely, and taking into consideration all the injuries alleged to have been sustained by petitioner as a result of his said alleged accident, including any and all ultimate results of any and all said alleged injuries, and further taking into consideration petitioner’s admissions as stated and basing this settlement primarily on these things, is willing to settle the entire matter for fifteen per cent, of total permanent disability of his right hand, amounting to twenty-two and a half weeks at $17 a week; of this amount ten per cent, of total permanent disability, amounting to fifteen weeks at $17 a week has already been paid petitioner in accordance with the informal award of this bureau, leaving a balance of seven and a half weeks at $17 a week. Respondent further agrees that it will pay $22.50 of whatever counsel fee is allowed petitioner’s attorney.

# $ $ $ * * *

Charles E. Corbin, *Deputy Commissioner.*
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 1 of 24 Pg ID 1
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 2 of 24 Pg ID 2
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 3 of 24 Pg ID 3
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 4 of 24 Pg ID 4
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 5 of 24 Pg ID 5
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 6 of 24 Pg ID 6
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 7 of 24 Pg ID 7
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 8 of 24 Pg ID 8
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 9 of 24 Pg ID 9
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 10 of 24 Pg ID 10
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 11 of 24 Pg ID 11
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 12 of 24 Pg ID 12
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 13 of 24 Pg ID 13
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 14 of 24 Pg ID 14
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 15 of 24 Pg ID 15
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 16 of 24 Pg ID 16
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 17 of 24 Pg ID 17
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 18 of 24 Pg ID 18
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 19 of 24 Pg ID 19
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 20 of 24 Pg ID 20
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 21 of 24 Pg ID 21
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 22 of 24 Pg ID 22
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 23 of 24 Pg ID 23
2:15-cr-20094-MOB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 02/19/15 Pg 24 of 24 Pg ID 24
Exhibit 32.1



Certification

Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Highlands Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Samuel L. Neese, Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Samuel L. Neese

Samuel L. Neese

Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer

March 31, 2006
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 19, 2022

No. 04-22-00658-CV

Michael R. VOORHIES and Norelle Voorhies,

Appellants

v.

TOWN OF HOLLYWOOD PARK, TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022-CI-02380

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was due on October 14, 2022, but has not been filed. On October 19, 

2022, the trial court clerk filed a notification of late record, notifying this court that the clerk’s 

record has not been filed because appellants have failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the 

clerk’s fee for preparing the record. It is therefore ORDERED that appellants provide written 

proof to this court within ten (10) days of the date of this order that either (1) the clerk’s fee has 

been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellants are entitled to 

appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. It is further ORDERED that the clerk’s record must be 

filed no later than ten (10) days after the date appellants’ written proof is filed with this court. If 

appellants fail to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of 

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of October, 2022.

_________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
# C_2011103EN.01002702.xml

| 2.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/27

---

Action brought on 18 February 2011 — BIA Separations v Commission

(Case T-88/11)

2011/C 103/47

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: BIA Separations d.o.o. (Ljubljana, Slovenia) (represented by: G. Berrisch, lawyer, and N. Chesaites, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the Commission’s implicit decision of 10 December 2010 rejecting the applicant’s confirmatory application for access to Commission Decision on the Co-operation Agreement between the European Community and the European Investment Bank in respect of the Risk-sharing Finance Facility (C(2008) 2181) and the Draft Commission Decision on amending the Co-operation Agreement between the European Community and the European Investment Bank in respect of the Risk-sharing Finance Facility (C(2008) 8058); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission’s implicit decision of 10 December 2010 rejecting the applicant’s confirmatory application for access to Commission Decision on the Co-operation Agreement between the European Community and the European Investment Bank in respect of the Risk-sharing Finance Facility (C(2008) 2181) and the Draft Commission Decision on amending the Co-operation Agreement between the European Community and the European Investment Bank in respect of the Risk-sharing Finance Facility (C(2008) 8058);

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law alleging that the Commission violated Article 296 TFEU by failing to respond to the applicant’s confirmatory request for access to information within the prescribed time-limit laid down in Article 8(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (1).

1

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43

1

---
#### Andrew Kehn, *Appellant, v.*The People of the State of New York, *Respondent*.

Award affirmed, without costs, according to memorandum of Boardman, J. Order to be settled by

Boardman, J.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

                       INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Lycos, Inc.:

  We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-47677, 333-51593, 333-61821 and 333-87779) on Form S-8, the
registration statements (Nos. 333-60101, 333-61413 and 333-85989) on Form S-3
and the registration statement (333-88749) on Form S-4 of Lycos, Inc. of our
report dated August 17, 1999 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Lycos, Inc. as of July 31, 1999, and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended July 31, 1999,
which report appears in the July 31, 1999, annual report on Form 10-K of
Lycos, Inc.

                                          /s/ KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
October 29, 1999
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                  MODACAD, INC.



MAURIZIO VECCHIONE and LEE FREEDMAN certify that:

1.   They are the  president  and  chief  financial  officer,  respectively,  of
     MODACAD, INC., a California corporation (the "Corporation").

2.   The  following  amendment  of the articles of  incorporation  has been duly
     approved by the Board of Directors of the Corporation.

3.   The  following  amendment  of the articles of  incorporation  has been duly
     approved by the required vote of the  shareholders  of the  Corporation  in
     accordance with Section 902 of the California Corporations Code. The number
     of  outstanding  shares of the sole class of shares  entitled  to vote with
     respect to the amendment was 7,401,515,  and the number of shares voting in
     favor  of  the  amendment  equaled  or  exceeded  the  vote  required.  The
     percentage vote required was more than 50%.

4.   Article 1 of the articles of incorporation is hereby amended to read in its
     entirety as follows:

                                       "I
              The name of this corporation is STYLECLICK.COM INC."

5.   This certificate of amendment shall become effective on July 19, 1999.

     We  declare  under  penalty  of  perjury  under  the  laws of the  State of
California  that the matters set forth in this  certificate are true and correct
of our own knowledge.

Date:  July 16, 1999
                                          /s/ MAURIZIO VECCHIONE
                                          ----------------------------------
                                          MAURIZIO VECCHIONE, President


                                          /s/ LEE FREEDMAN
                                          ----------------------------------
                                          LEE FREEDMAN, Chief Financial Officer
# C_2014439EN.01000301.xml

| 8.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 439/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 439/3

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Rita van Caster, Patrick van Caster v Finanzamt Essen-Süd

(Case C-326/12) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Free movement of capital - Article 63 TFEU - Taxation of income from investment funds - Investment fund’s obligations to communicate and publish certain information - Flat-rate taxation of income from investment funds which do not comply with communication and publication obligations))

(2014/C 439/03)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Rita van Caster, Patrick van Caster

Applicants:

Defendant: Finanzamt Essen-Süd

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 63 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding national legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings which provides that the failure by a non-resident investment fund to comply with the obligations to communicate and publish certain information required by that legislation, which are applicable without distinction to resident and non-resident investment funds alike, resulting in the flat-rate taxation of the income which the taxpayer earns from that investment fund, since that legislation does not allow the taxpayer to provide evidence or information that could prove the actual size of that income.

---

(1)  OJ C 303, 6.10.2012.

1

---
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6902 Filed 10/07/18 Page 1 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6903 Filed 10/07/18 Page 2 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6904 Filed 10/07/18 Page 3 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6905 Filed 10/07/18 Page 4 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6906 Filed 10/07/18 Page 5 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6907 Filed 10/07/18 Page 6 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6908 Filed 10/07/18 Page 7 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6909 Filed 10/07/18 Page 8 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6910 Filed 10/07/18 Page 9 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6911 Filed 10/07/18 Page 10 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6912 Filed 10/07/18 Page 11 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6913 Filed 10/07/18 Page 12 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6914 Filed 10/07/18 Page 13 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6915 Filed 10/07/18 Page 14 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6916 Filed 10/07/18 Page 15 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6917 Filed 10/07/18 Page 16 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6918 Filed 10/07/18 Page 17 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6919 Filed 10/07/18 Page 18 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6920 Filed 10/07/18 Page 19 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6921 Filed 10/07/18 Page 20 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6922 Filed 10/07/18 Page 21 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6923 Filed 10/07/18 Page 22 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6924 Filed 10/07/18 Page 23 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6925 Filed 10/07/18 Page 24 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6926 Filed 10/07/18 Page 25 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6927 Filed 10/07/18 Page 26 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6928 Filed 10/07/18 Page 27 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6929 Filed 10/07/18 Page 28 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6930 Filed 10/07/18 Page 29 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6931 Filed 10/07/18 Page 30 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6932 Filed 10/07/18 Page 31 of 32
Case 2:15-cr-20217-SJM-APP ECF No. 262-19, PageID.6933 Filed 10/07/18 Page 32 of 32
Editorial Note on Part 199
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 199 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59789, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 199.240 Muster stations. Each passenger vessel must, in addition to meeting the requirements of § 199.110, have muster stations that— ( a ) Are near the embarkation stations, unless a muster station is also an embarkation station;
( b ) Permit ready access to the embarkation station, unless a muster station is also an embarkation station; and
( c ) Have sufficient room to marshal and instruct passengers and special personnel.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending August 5, 2006

|Filer             | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                | End of Comment Period                                  
|----------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|SKY BANK          | Foreign Branch | Sky Bank, Salineville, Ohio, to establish a foreign branch in GeorgeTown, Grand Cayman Island, Cayman Islands, pursuant to Section 211.3(b)(2) of Regulation K | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:        | Not applicable
|Federal Register: | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location            | RSSDID | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|--------------------------------- | ------ | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|SAINT HENRY BK, SAINT HENRY, OHIO | 568126 | 05/22/2006 | 07/31/2006     | S         | Small Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
**Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 October 2011 – GS v Parliament and Council**

**(Case T-149/11)**

Action for annulment – Regulation (EU) No 1210/2010 – Right of the Member States to refuse the reimbursement of euro coins unfit for circulation – No direct concern – Inadmissible

Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Whether directly concerned – Criteria – Provision of a regulation giving Member States the right to refuse reimbursement of certain euro coins unfit for circulation
– Applicant not directly concerned – Inadmissibility (Art. 230, fourth para., EC; Arts 263, fourth para., TFEU and 288, second para., TFEU; European Parliament
and Council Regulation No 1210/2010) (see paras 18-19, 24-25, 28)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for annulment of the second sentence of Article 8(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1210/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2010 concerning authentication of euro coins and handling of euro coins unfit for circulation (OJ 2010 L 339, p. 1). |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | GS Gesellschaft für Umwelt- und Energie-Serviceleistungen mbH is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament and by the Council of the European Union. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | There is no need to adjudicate on the Kingdom of Spain’s application for leave to intervene. |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          20,529
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,810
<ALLOWANCES>                                       232
<INVENTORY>                                      2,608
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,804
<PP&E>                                           9,716
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,379
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,750
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            59
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,647
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,456
<SALES>                                         26,857
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,857
<CGS>                                           14,457
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    40
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,680
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,895
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,785
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,785
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.76
        

</TABLE>