alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CONRAD'S.

Tue Express & Total Car Care

S2954 WALKER ROAD INVOICE NO: 4131449
jale Type: C AVON LAKE, OH 44012 WORK ORDER: 777558
. (440) 933-GEM0 S35 Pr Vivdi/si4
SERVICE
cust Nuws a Phone Nos: 448-897-2525
SRIAN HASSETT Car Model: 2229 Chrysler 3aa "4
{2678 ADMIRAL?S WAY Car Color: BLACK
License Not FVF7Giz OH ©
WON LAKE, OH 44012 VwI.Ne: ECSLASSVESHS751a3

Technicians FOOSE Mileage: 83254
‘romiseds 11/11/14
Writer: ROBERT CROW
ieve Adv: ROBERT CROW

eaeite’ Pipd ogi Bese Extended
Product Code & Description Labor Parts Ext Dise Total
43 1 LUBE, OIL & FILTER - GooD
- FFa4 - 1a. we 14.95 19.95
$5 GFF OLL. CHANGE -5. ae

| Lube steering components where applicable
_! Inspect appropriate fluids and advise

—! Lube all door hinges

| Set air pressure in tires

_! Install reminder sticker on windshield.

_!

i
1
|
1,
i
Il Reset O11 Service Light where applicable

ia 1 NAPSFI27@G6QMF-~-PRO SELECT OIL FILTER

2) 4 TIRE ROTATION ~ AUTO (EACH)
4861 3. 5a = ie
TIRE ROTATION — FREE (EACH) ~3. 5a

3) i TOTAL TIRE REPAIR - Lifetime Labor & Parts
TTR 195.95 » Ba
FREE TOTAL TIRE REPAIR ~19.95

L/F,4,L/R TIRES ARE LEAKING...CHECK AND ADVISE
HREERELALLE RES HE RARE E ELE LEK LE LKE KERR EREERER.
CHECK TPMS SENSORE FOR CORROSION. .ADVISE
14) 1 TPMS SENSOR - 12 Mth/12,@0@ Lbr/24 Mth/24, 000 Parts
4150 19.95 9.95
$1@ OFF ANY SERVICE OVER #100 ~1, aia |

TEMS SENSOR
14B 1 Q@58258-TPMS SENSOR 89.95) 83.95

TODAY WE PREFORMED A FULL SERVICE OIL/FILTER
CHANGE AND TIRE ROTATION. WE TOPFED OFF ALL

PLAINTIFF’S

eat



Ine Express & Total Car Care

- PAGE &
32954 WALKER ROAD INVOICE NOs alsi449
ale Type: C AVON LOKE, OH 44212 WORK ORDER: 7277558
(4408) 933-6600 S35 PM LL/La/sl4
SERVICE
meee Prige son Extended
ine Qty Product Code & Description Labor Total

FLUIDS AND SET TIRE PRESSURES...

HAHKLR ARERR AKAN LH SHELL LRH EN ALERE NLL EUR ERE EH

WE FOUND BOTH RIMS TO HAVE RIM LEAKS CLEANED
AND RESEALED. RECHECKED FOUND TPS SENSOR TO
BE LEAKING. ADVISED CUSTOMER REPLACED TEMS
SENSOR RECHECKED OK NOW...

ERRELE ARERR LEE NER ER KER EE LEER EEE R HERR REE RE
TPMS SYSTEM WILL RELEARN IT SELF. TPMS LisHT
WILL BE ON FOR ABOUT @@ MILES OR SO UNTIL
SYSTEM LEARNS POSITION. TPMS WILL RESET ITSELF
LIGHT ON UNTIL IT RESETS.....

TPMS SENSOR CORRODED LEAKING AIR. SEVERE
CORROSION...

EREKEE RARER EGE EEL LERE SELLER REL ENE L EE EE

Thank you for choosing Conrads

Parts 9 104, 3a
Labor: 14.95
Rewards Certificatess BS. BaCR
Shop Supply Fees 8.54
6 5@ % Sales Taxz 6.78
Invoiced by: Jeremy D. Vinee Invoice Totals Tia. ai
Amcunt Paids MASTRORD/VISA/DISCUR Lim. di
erie —— oe Balance Duer sia

CUSTOMER ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPD OF VEHICLE AND ACCEPTANCE oF
LIMITED WARRANTY ATED OM REVERSE SIDE

Print Names KaestzT_

IF YOU ARE NOT ima SATISFIED, CALL Kevin Fu MeCall,
THE STORE LEADER, AT (440) 9353-660R.

Signature:
§ 170.245 Foam flotation material. ( a ) Installation of foam must be approved by the OCMI.
( b ) If foam is used to comply with § 171.070(d), § 171.095(c), or § 173.063(e) of this subchapter, the following applies: ( 1 ) Foam may be installed only in void spaces that are free of ignition sources.
( 2 ) The foam must comply with NPFC MIL-P-21929B (incorporated by reference; see 46 CFR 170.015), including the requirements for fire resistance.
( 3 ) A submergence test must be conducted for a period of at least 7 days to demonstrate whether the foam has adequate strength to withstand a hydrostatic head equivalent to that which would be imposed if the vessel were submerged to its margin line.
( 4 ) The effective buoyancy at the end of the submergence test must be used as the buoyancy credit; however, in no case will a credit greater than 55 lbs per cubic foot (881 kilograms per cubic meter) be allowed.
( 5 ) The structure enclosing the foam must be strong enough to accommodate the buoyancy of the foam.
( 6 ) Piping and cables must not pass through foamed spaces unless they are within piping and cable trunks accessible from both ends.
( 7 ) Sample specimens must be prepared during installation and the density of the installed foam must be determined.
( 8 ) Foam may be installed adjacent to fuel tanks if the boundary between the tank and space has double continuous fillet welds.
( 9 ) MIL-P-21929B is incorporated by reference into this part.
( 10 ) The results of all tests and calculations must be submitted to the OCMI.
( 11 ) Blocked foam must— ( i ) Be used in each area that may be exposed to water; and
( ii ) Have a protective cover approved by the OCMI.
[CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51010, Nov. 4, 1983, as amended by CGD 83-005, 51 FR 923, Jan. 9, 1986; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65203, Oct. 31, 2008]
##### 



(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of and for the period covered by this Report.
 Dated: May 14, 2007
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Mark S. AllioMark S. AllioChairman of the Board, President andChief Executive OfficerDated: May 14, 2007
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Therese Ann LiutkusTherese Ann Liutkus, CPATreasurer and Chief Financial Officer
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00149-CV

DARRYL HEFFNER, Appellant

V.

TIMOTHY HEFFNER, MATTHEW 

HEFFNER, AND JONATHAN HEFFNER,

Appellees

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 235th District 

Court

of Cooke County (CV21-00248)

April 13, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice 

Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PLANET HOLLYWOOD INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR THE THIRTY-NINE
WEEKS ENDED SEPTEMBER 29, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-1996
<CASH>                                          63,342
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     15,431
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               115,879
<PP&E>                                         243,981
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,577
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 375,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,271
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,057
<OTHER-SE>                                     295,401
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   375,893
<SALES>                                        260,060
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               274,231
<CGS>                                           70,318
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  216,266
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,037
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,508
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,420
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,498
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 10,421
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,501
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23<F1>
<FN>
<F1>RESTATED PURSUANT TO SEC REGULATION S-K, ITEM 601, 
TO CONFORM TO SFAS NO. 128. "EPS-PRIMARY" DENOTES BASIC EPS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2215 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 202
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2215

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                            November 4, 2009

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 140 Merriman Road in Garden City, Michigan, as the ``John J. Shivnen 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHN J. SHIVNEN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 140 Merriman Road in Garden City, Michigan, shall be known 
and designated as the ``John J. Shivnen Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John J. 
Shivnen Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 202

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2215

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 140 Merriman Road in Garden City, Michigan, as the ``John J. Shivnen 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 4, 2009

                       Reported without amendment
```
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.01
 
                             PRISM SOLUTIONS, INC.
 
                       COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
               (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                       ------------------------------------------
                                                          1995           1996            1997
                                                       ----------     -----------     -----------
<S>                                                    <C>            <C>             <C>
Basic and diluted:
  Weighted average common shares outstanding for the
     period..........................................   1,799,290      11,219,156      13,868,960
  Common equivalent shares pursuant to Staff
     Accounting Bulletin No. 83......................   1,246,278         256,179              --
                                                        ---------      ----------      ----------
Shares used in per share calculation.................   3,045,568      11,475,335      13,868,960
                                                        =========      ==========      ==========
Net loss.............................................  $   (2,738)    $    (1,839)    $   (16,152)
                                                        =========      ==========      ==========
Net loss per share...................................  $    (0.90)    $     (0.16)    $     (1.16)
                                                        =========      ==========      ==========
</TABLE>
#### Sylvester E. Brown, Respondent, *v.*Joseph F. Crawford, *Appellant*.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Haight, J.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NetSolve, Incorporated (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Kenneth C. Kieley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    Kenneth C. KieleyName: Kenneth C. KieleyTitle:   Chief Financial Officer




August 13, 2004

---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Sec. 2 Amount of bond.

The amount of the bond must be governed by the amount of monies advanced or value of slop chest property entrusted, and shall, at all times, not be less than the value of slop chest property entrusted plus advances of monies for which a satisfactory accounting has not been made.
#### § 201.118 Witness fees; expenses of taking depositions.

Witnesses whose depositions are taken pursuant to the regulations in this part, and the officer taking such deposition, shall severally be entitled to the same fees and mileage as are paid in the courts of the United States. All expenses of taking such depositions shall be paid by the party at whose instance the deposition is taken.
United States District Court 

Eastern District of Michigan (Detroit) 

Stephanie K. Carney, ) Civil No.: 2:15-cv-11032-MAG-RSW 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) Mark A. Goldsmith 

 ) United States District Judge 

 ) 

v. ) R. Steven Whalen 

 ) United States Magistrate Judge 

 ) 

Carolyn W. Colvin, ) 

Acting Commissioner of the ) 

Social Security Administration, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

Order Granting Stipulated Motion for Remand Under Sentence Six of 42 

U.S.C. § 405(g) 

 Plaintiff and Defendant have stipulated that this case be remanded under 

sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Accordingly, it is ordered that this case is 

remanded under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for a de novo hearing before an 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Dated: May 26, 2015 s/Mark A. Goldsmith 

 Detroit, Michigan MARK A. GOLDSMITH 

 United States District Judge 

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any 

unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail 

addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on May 26, 2015. 

 s/Carrie Haddon 

 Case Manager 

2:15-cv-11032-MAG-RSW Doc # 8 Filed 05/26/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LASHAWN YOUNG, 

Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cv-11028

Honorable Marianne O. Battani

v. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford

METROPOLITAN LIFE 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant. 

____________________________/

ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF’S BRIEFING

SCHEDULE

On May 19, 2015, the Court held a scheduling conference in this 

case, and ordered that the administrative record be filed by July 6, 2015, 

and that cross-motions for summary judgment be filed by today, September 

4, 2015. This morning, Defendant filed a supplement to the administrative 

record, consisting of twenty-seven pages of internal correspondence. To 

prevent prejudice to Plaintiff, the Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiff may 

either delay his submission of his motion for summary judgment until 

September 18, 2015, or, (as he is pro se and will not receive this order via 

electronic filing) may have until September 18, 2015, to supplement his 

motion based on the supplemental administrative record. 

2:15-cv-11028-MOB-EAS Doc # 28 Filed 09/04/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 737
2

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 4, 2015 s/Elizabeth A. Stafford

 ELIZABETH A. STAFFORD

 United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES REGARDING OBJECTIONS

The parties’ attention is drawn to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), which 

provides a period of fourteen (14) days from the date of receipt of a copy of 

this order within which to file objections for consideration by the district 

judge under 28 U.S. C. §636(b)(1). 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon 

counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF 

System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses 

disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on September 4, 2015.

s/Marlena Williams 

MARLENA WILLIAMS

Case Manager

2:15-cv-11028-MOB-EAS Doc # 28 Filed 09/04/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 738
EXHIBIT 10.6


Summary of Purchase Agreement by and between Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. (the
"Company") and Luhua Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. ("Luhua") dated as of April
14, 2004.

         The  contract  number for this  agreement  is  WI-040204-LHKJ/04.  This
agreement does not include an exact quantity to be purchased by the Company. The
quantity is to be determined at the time of each  purchase.  From September 2003
to September 2004, the purchase volume was RMB 74,046,804.72  Yuan. In the event
of breach of  contract,  the  breaching  party  must pay  damages  equal to five
percent (5%) of the total contract value during the term of the agreement.
Exhibit 10.4


FORM OF DEFERRAL ELECTIONS FOR [GRANT YEAR]
-------------------------------------------
PERFORMANCE-BASED RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT AWARD
---------------------------------------------


IN-SERVICE DISTRIBUTION:
------------------------

I elect to defer receipt of my entire [Grant Year] grant of restricted share
units after they vest until _______________________________________, which is a
specific date between the first Compensation Committee meeting in January [one
year following Grant Year] and ten (10) years after such meeting.

I understand that this election may only be modified if, at least twelve (12)
months prior to the initial deferral date indicated above, I elect to further
defer receipt of my entire grant to a specific date between the first
Compensation Committee meeting in January [one year following Grant Year] and
ten (10) years after such meeting that is at least five (5) years after my
initial deferral date.


---------------------------------              ---------------------------------
Signature                                      Date




POST-TERMINATION DISTRIBUTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN DEATH OR DISABILITY:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

I elect to defer receipt of my entire [Grant Year] grant of restricted share
units after they vest until _________________________________ after termination
of my employment for reasons other than death or disability, which is a time
between six (6) months after my separation from service and three (3) years
after my separation from service.

I understand that this election is irrevocable.


---------------------------------              ---------------------------------
Signature                                      Date




POST-TERMINATION DISTRIBUTION DUE TO DISABILITY:
------------------------------------------------

I elect to defer receipt of my entire [Grant Year] grant of restricted share
units after they vest until _________________________________ after termination
of my employment due to disability, which is a time between my separation from
service and three (3) years after my separation from service.

I understand that this election is irrevocable.


---------------------------------              ---------------------------------
Signature                                      Date


<PAGE>


POST-TERMINATION DISTRIBUTION DUE TO DEATH:

I elect to defer receipt of my entire [Grant Year] grant of restricted share
units after they vest until _________________________________ after termination
of my employment due to death, which is a time between my separation from
service and three (3) years after my separation from service.

I understand that this election is irrevocable.


---------------------------------              ---------------------------------
Signature                                      Date
You are here: EPA Home Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention Pollution Prevention & Toxics Existing Chemicals Identifying Priority Chemicals for Review

As part of EPA’s comprehensive approach to enhance the Agency’s current chemicals management program, EPA plans to use a two-step process to identify priority chemical substances for review and assessment under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). EPA’s goal is to identify priority chemicals for near-term evaluation, not to screen and prioritize the entire TSCA Inventory of approximately 84,000 chemicals. EPA held a webinar and is hosting an online discussion forum to get public input on the prioritization factors and data sources the Agency is planning to use in this process. To help structure public input, EPA has posted a discussion guide describing the two-step process EPA plans to use to identify priority chemicals for review and requesting input on the prioritization factors and data sources to be used for this purpose. Read the discussion guide (PDF). (8 pp. 38 kb, About PDF)

. EPA conducted a webinar on September 7, 2011 to present the process and discuss the prioritization factors and data sources. Read the webinar slides (PDF). (15 pp. 230 kb, About PDF)

. EPA has also opened a discussion forum on the EPA website to allow people to share their thoughts online. The discussion forum will remain open for input through 5:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time on September 21, 2011, and all information posted to the forum will remain accessible for reading after posts are no longer being accepted. After the discussion forum closes, a summary of the discussion at the webinar and copies of all postsmade through the online discussion forum will be placed in the docket for this activity, EPA-HQOPPT-2011-0516, which will be available at http://www.regulations.gov. 

## Existing Chemicals http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/chemprioritizations.html Last updated on Wednesday, September 14, 2011 Identifying Priority Chemicals for Review | Existing Chemicals | OPPT | ... http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/chemprioritizations.html

1 of 1 9/29/2011 9:42 AM