alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Filed 12/21/10 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2010 ND 242

City of Grand Forks, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Roland Clifford Riemers, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20100107

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Lawrence E. Jahnke, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Stacey Ann Dahl, Assistant City Prosecutor, 311 South 4th Street, Suite 103, Grand Forks, N.D. 58201, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Roland Clifford Riemers, self-represented, P.O. Box 14702, Grand Forks, N.D. 58208; submitted on brief.

City of Grand Forks v. Riemers

No. 20100107

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Roland Riemers appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of driving without liability insurance in violation of Grand Forks City Ordinance 8-0205, which prohibits a person from driving a motor vehicle in Grand Forks without liability insurance and requires the person, upon request during the investigation of an accident or within twenty days of the request, to provide satisfactory evidence of a liability policy.  Riemers argues the city ordinance is unconstitutional, the district court erred in not dismissing the criminal complaint for lack of service of process, a law enforcement officer had no legal authority to require Riemers to provide proof of insurance, the court erred in admitting evidence that Riemers did not have liability insurance, the court erred in instructing the jury, and the court erred in denying Riemers’ motion for a directed verdict.  We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Dale V. Sandstrom
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”), as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Rick
      Berry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                RICK BERRYRick
                BerryChief
                Financial Officer




May
      12,
      2008




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. and will be retained by Sanders Morris Harris
      Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
# C_2012089EN.01001301.xml

| 24.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/13

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 9 January 2012 — Colloseum Holding AG v Levi Strauss & Co.

(Case C-12/12)

2012/C 89/20

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Colloseum Holding AG

Applicant:

Defendant: Levi Strauss & Co.

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

Is Article 15(1) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that:

1

| 1. | a trade mark which is part of a composite mark and has become distinctive only as a result of the use of the composite mark can be used in such a way as to preserve the rights attached to it if the composite mark alone is used? |
| --- | --- |

1.

a trade mark which is part of a composite mark and has become distinctive only as a result of the use of the composite mark can be used in such a way as to preserve the rights attached to it if the composite mark alone is used?

| 2. | a trade mark is being used in such a way as to preserve the rights attached to it if it is used only together with another mark, the public sees independent signs in the two marks and, in addition, both marks are registered together as a trade mark? |
| --- | --- |

2.

a trade mark is being used in such a way as to preserve the rights attached to it if it is used only together with another mark, the public sees independent signs in the two marks and, in addition, both marks are registered together as a trade mark?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
§ 28.335 Fuel systems. ( a ) *Applicability.* Except for the components of an outboard engine or portable bilge pump, each vessel must meet the requirements of this section.
( b ) *Portable fuel systems.* Portable fuel systems including portable tanks and related fuel lines and accessories are prohibited except where used for outboard engines or portable bilge pumps. The design, construction, and stowage of portable tanks and related fuel lines and accessories must meet the requirements of ABYC H-25.
( c ) *Fuel restrictions.* Except for outboard engines, the use of fuel other than bunker C or diesel is prohibited. An installation using bunker C must comply with the requirements of subchapter F of this chapter.
( d ) *Vent pipes for integral fuel tanks.* Each integral fuel tank must meet the requirements of this paragraph. ( 1 ) Each fuel tank must be fitted with a vent pipe connected to the highest point of the tank terminating in a 180 degree (3.14 radians) bend on a weather deck and fitted with a flame screen.
( 2 ) Except where provision is made to fill a tank under pressure, the net cross-sectional area of the vent pipe for a fuel tank must not be less than 0.484 square inches (312.3 square millimeters).
( 3 ) Where provision is made to fill a tank under pressure, the net cross-sectional area of the vent pipe must not be less than that of the fill pipe.
( e ) *Fuel piping.* Except as permitted in paragraph (e)(1) and (e)(2) of this section, each fuel line must be seamless and must be of steel, annealed copper, nickel-copper, or copper-nickel. Each fuel line must have a wall thickness of not less than that of 0.035 inch (0.9 millimeters) except that: ( 1 ) Aluminum piping is acceptable on an aluminum hull vessel provided it is installed outside the machinery space and is at least Schedule 80 in thickness; and
( 2 ) Nonmetallic flexible hose is acceptable but must— ( i ) Not be used in lengths of more than 30 inches (0.82 meters);
( ii ) Be visible, easily accessible, and must not penetrate a watertight bulkhead;
( iii ) Be fabricated with an inner tube and a cover of synthetic rubber or other suitable material reinforced with wire braid.
( iv ) Be fitted with suitable, corrosion resistant, compression fittings; and
( v ) Be installed with two clamps at each end of the hose, if designed for use with clamps. Clamps must not rely on spring tension and must be installed beyond the bead or flare or over the serrations of the mating spud, pipe, or hose fitting.
( f ) A fuel line subject to internal head pressure from fuel in the tank must be fitted with a positive shutoff valve located at the tank which is operable from a safe location outside the space in which the valve is located.
( g ) A vessel less than 79 feet (24 meters) in length may comply with one of the following standards in lieu of the requirements of paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section. ( 1 ) ABYC H-33.
( 2 ) Chapter 5 of NFPA 302.
( 3 ) 33 CFR chapter I, subchapter S (Boating Safety).
###### Editorial Note on Part 160

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 160.046-1 Scope.

This subpart applies to emergency provisions approved to be carried in lifeboats and liferafts, in accordance with 46 CFR 199.175(b)(22).
# C_2013225EN.01005202.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/52

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 May 2013 — (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Pordenone — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Fidenato Giorgio

(Case C-542/12) (1)

1

(Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure - Directive 2002/53/EC - Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species - Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) entered in the common catalogue - Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 - Article 20 - Existing products - Directive 2001/18/EC - Article 26a - Measures to avoid the accidental presence of genetically modified organisms)

2013/C 225/93

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Pordenone (Italy)

Criminal proceedings against

Criminal proceedings against

Fidenato Giorgio

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale di Pordenone — Interpretation of Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC (OJ 2001 L 106, p. 1) — National legislation making the cultivation of GMOs, entered in the common catalogue of varieties, subject to an authorisation procedure to avoid the accidental presence of genetically modified organisms in other crops (principle of coexistence)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

European Union law must be interpreted as meaning that the cultivation of genetically modified organisms such as maize varieties MON 810 cannot be made subject to a national authorisation procedure, where the use and marketing of those varieties are authorised under Article 20 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed, and where those varieties have been entered in the common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species provided for in Council Directive 2002/53/EC of 13 June 2002 on the common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species, as amended by Regulation No 1829/2003. Article 26a of Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC, as amended by Directive 2008/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008, must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from opposing the cultivation on its territory of such genetically modified organisms on the ground that obtaining a national authorisation would constitute a coexistence measure to avoid the accidental present of genetically modified organisms in other crops.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 2.3.2013.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 99.10****CONSENT OF EXPERT**     Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the “40-F”) of Cameco Corporation (the“Company”) to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.     I hereby consent to the use of and reference to my name under the heading “The NuclearBusiness — Reserves and Resources” in the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year endedDecember 31, 2007, dated March 28, 2008 (the “AIF”), under the heading “Qualified Persons” inManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation for the yearended December 31, 2007 (the “MD&A”) and in the 40-F, and to disclosure of a scientific andtechnical nature pursuant to which I have acted in a supervisory capacity under the heading “TheNuclear Business — Reserves and Resources” of the AIF and under the heading “Qualified Persons” inthe MD&A.Sincerely,     */s/         Alain Mainville*  Name:  Alain Mainville  Title:  Director, Mineral Resources Management, Cameco Corporation  Date: March 31, 2008
Jurisdiction of Incorporation orEntity
    
    OrganizationSapient Canada Inc.
    
    CanadaSapient Corporation Private Limited
    
    IndiaSapient GmbH
    
    GermanySapient Government Services, Inc.
    
    DelawareSapient Limited
    
    United KingdomSapient Netherlands B.V.
    
    The NetherlandsSapient Securities Corporation
    
    MassachusettsSapient Sweden AB
    
    SwedenSapient Switzerland AG
    
    SwitzerlandPlanning Group International, Inc.
    
    FloridaDerivatives Consulting Group LLC
    
    New YorkThe Derivatives Consulting Group Limited
    
    United KingdomDerivatives Consulting (UK) Limited
    
    United KingdomDerivatives Consulting Group (Holdings) Limited
    
    United KingdomDerivatives Consulting Group (Singapore) Pte Limited
    
    SingaporeDerivatives Consulting Group (HK) Pte Limited
    
    Hong KongA Plus Studio Ltd
    
    United KingdomEngine Room Studio, Inc.
    
    New YorkLeft Blue Sky Inc.
    
    New YorkLeftBlueSky Ltd
    
    United KingdomMook Limited
    
    United KingdomNitro Group Pty Ltd
    
    AustraliaNitro Hong Kong Limited
    
    Hong KongNitro Limited
    
    United KingdomSapient Asia Holdings Luxembourg S.a.r.l.
    
    LuxembourgSapient (BVI) Limited
    
    British Virgin Islands




---



##### 



Jurisdiction of Incorporation orEntity
    
    OrganizationSapient Consulting Private Limited
    
    IndiaSapient (Gibraltar) Limited
    
    GibraltarSapient Holdings Luxembourg S.a.r.l.
    
    LuxembourgSapient International GmbH
    
    SwitzerlandSapient Mauritius Holdings Ltd
    
    Republic of MauritiusSapientNitro Pty Ltd
    
    AustraliaSapientNitro USA, Inc.
    
    DelawareSapient Operations Luxembourg S.a.r.l.
    
    LuxembourgShanghai Nitro Advertising Co. Limited
    
    ChinaShanghai Nitro Consulting Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaNitro LLC
    
    Russia
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-QSB
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             829
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,017
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     11,356
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         15,265
<ALLOWANCE>                                        227
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,771
<DEPOSITS>                                      20,159
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                248
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  32,771
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    545
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  359
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   371
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,275
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 474
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 474
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              801
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      202
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,313
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (693)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        (432)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (432)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.33)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.73
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    24
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  227
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               227
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
# C_2014315EN.01004401.xml

| 15.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/44

---

Order of the President of the Court of 5 June 2014 — El Corte Inglés, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Emilio Pucci International BV

(Case C-578/12 P) (1)

1

2014/C 315/71

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 46, 16.2.2013.

1

---
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2344 

AN ACT 

To amend section 114 of title 17, United States Code, to 

provide for agreements for the reproduction and performance of sound recordings by webcasters. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2344 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Webcaster Settlement 

3 Act of 2009’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF AGREEMENTS. 

5 Section 114(f)(5) of title 17, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘2008’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘2008, the Webcaster Settlement Act 

9 of 2009,’’; 

10 (2) in subparagraph (E)(iii), by striking ‘‘to 

11 make eligible nonsubscription transmissions and 

12 ephemeral recordings’’; and 

13 (3) in subparagraph (F), by striking ‘‘February 

14 15, 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘at 11:59 p.m. Eastern 

15 time on the 30th day after the date of the enactment 

16 of the Webcaster Settlement Act of 2009’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 9, 2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2344 

AN ACT 

To amend section 114 of title 17, United States 

webcasters. tion and performance of sound recordings by Code, to provide for agreements for the reproduc-
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NetSolve, Incorporated (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, David D. Hood, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/     David D. HoodName: David D. HoodTitle:   President and Chief Executive Officer




August 13, 2004

---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### § 173.062 Drainage of weather deck.

The weather deck of each sailing school vessel must be provided with drainage in accordance with the requirements in subpart H of part 171 of this subchapter or subpart D of part 178 in subchapter T of this chapter.

[CGD 83-005, 51 FR 925, Jan. 9, 1986, as amended by CGD 85-080, 61 FR 946, Jan. 10, 1996]
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.019-17 Recognized laboratory. ( a ) *General.* A laboratory may be designated as a recognized laboratory under this subpart if it is— ( 1 ) Accepted by the Coast Guard as an independent laboratory under subpart 159.010 of this subchapter; and
( 2 ) Established in the inspection of factory production, listing, and labeling, by having an existing program and standards for evaluation, listing, and marking components, that are acceptable to the Commandant.
( b ) *Designated recognized laboratories.* A current listing of recognized laboratories is available from the Commandant upon request.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22
- 50733 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Leon Johnson,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:21
- CR
- 267 - 1

**_________________________ _____**  Before **Higginbotham, Graves,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Leon Johnson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Johnson has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the r elevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 12, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-50733 Document: 00516783263 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/12/2023No. 22
- 50733

2 concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further res ponsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 22-50733 Document: 00516783263 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/12/2023
#### § 28.1115 Waiver request and approval records.

The Coast Guard will maintain a record of citizenship waiver requests and approvals. Approvals will be documented for the applicable vessel(s) in the Coast Guard's vessel information database.