alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM JUNE
     30, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
     TO SUCH
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001007047
<NAME>                        Arterial Vascular Engineering, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          25,036
<SECURITIES>                                    62,192
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,080
<INVENTORY>                                      7,302
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,265
<PP&E>                                          24,334
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,575
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 147,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,779
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                     138,169
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   147,979
<SALES>                                         79,420
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,420
<CGS>                                           16,217
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,217
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,932
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,461
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,711
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,750
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.69
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Wendy A. Hocking, Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

Wendy A. Hocking,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 07-1488 Filed 3-22-07; 4:43 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
#### William E. Williams, *Respondent, v.*Frank R. Sherwin, *Appellant*.

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.106-2 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this subpart with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material is available for inspection at the U.S. Coast Guard, Office of Design and Engineering Standards (CG-ENG), 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, and is available from the sources listed below. It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html*.
( b ) International Maritime Organization (IMO) Publishing, 4 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR, United Kingdom, +44 (0)20 7735 7611, *http://www.imo.org*. ( 1 ) 2010 FTP Code, International Code for Application of Fire Test Procedures, 2010 (Resolution MSC.307(88)), 2012 Edition (“FTP Code”), IBR approved for § 164.106-3(a).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
§ 177.820 Seating. ( a ) A seat must be provided for each passenger permitted in a space for which the fixed seating criterion in § 176.113(b)(3) of this subchapter has been used to determine the number of passengers permitted.
( b ) A seat must be constructed to minimize the possibility of injury and avoid trapping occupants.
( c ) Installation of seats must provide for ready escape.
( d ) Seats, including fixed, temporary, or portable seats, must be arranged as follows: ( 1 ) An aisle of not more than 4.572 meters (15 feet) in overall length must be not less than 610 millimeters (24 inches) in width.
( 2 ) An aisle of more than 4.572 meters (15 feet) in overall length must be not less than 760 millimeters (30 inches) in width.
( 3 ) Where seats are in rows, the distance from seat front to seat front must be not less than 760 millimeters (30 inches) and the seats must be secured to a deck or bulkhead.
( 4 ) Seats used to determine the number of passengers permitted, in accordance with § 176.113(b)(3) of this chapter, must be secured to the deck, bulkhead, or bulwark.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 961, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by USCG-2010-0759, 75 FR 60004, Sept. 29, 2010]
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.29

Voyager One, Inc.
859 West End Court - Suite I
Vernon Hills, IL 60061
Phone: (847) 984-6200
Fax: (847) 984-6201

December 13, 2004                                   SENT BY FAX AND REGULAR MAIL
                                                    ----------------------------

Troy Rillo
Senior Vice President
Cornell Capital Partners, LP
101 Hudson Street-Suite 3700
Jersey City, NJ   07302

RE:    Voyager One, Inc.-Registration Statement SB-2/A

Dear Troy:

Pursuant to your recent request, this will confirm that Voyager One, Inc. agrees
that if the number of shares of common stock registered pursuant to the
Securities Purchase Agreement and documents executed in connection therewith in
the registration statement filed on August 26, 2004 and subsequent amendments
thereto drops below a two for one share coverage of the outstanding $1,100,000
convertible debentures held by Cornell Capital Partners, L.P. and Trey
Resources, Inc. and their assignees and successors based on an average closing
bid price for any 10 consecutive trading days ("reference price") after the
registration statement referred to above is declared effective by the SEC, then
Voyager One, Inc. will promptly file a new registration statement seeking to
register an additional amount of shares equal to five times coverage based on
the "reference price," one-half of the shares to be registered for Cornell
Capital Partners, L.P. and one-half of the shares to be registered for Trey
Resources, Inc.

Voyager One, Inc. further agrees to provide Cornell Capital Partners, L.P. with
draft responses to numbers 1 through 3, inclusive, and 5 through 8, inclusive,
of the SEC's second set of comments by Wednesday, December 15, 2004.

Voyager One, Inc. shall use its best efforts to file the second amendment to the
SB-2 filed on August 26, 2004 by Monday, December 20, 2004.

This will further confirm that the terms of this letter supersede the terms of
the letter dated November 19, 2004, a copy of which is attached hereto, and that
the terms indicated therein are null and void.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Sebastien C. DuFort
-----------------------

Sebastien DuFort
President

Accepted: /s/ Mark A. Angelo                        12/15/04
          --------------------------------          ---------------------------
          Mark A. Angelo-Portfolio Manager          Date
          Cornell Capital Partners, L.P.
§ 194.20-17 Compressed gases. ( a ) Nonflammable compressed gases (excluding oxygen) may be securely stowed in the storeroom: *Provided,* That no more than eight (8) cylinders total are stowed simultaneously in the same chemical storeroom.
( b ) Flammable compressed gases and oxygen shall be stowed in accordance with 49 CFR part 176, subpart H.
( c ) Compressed gas cylinders shall have valve protection in accordance with 49 CFR 173.301(g) and shall be safely stowed in a vertical position in suitable racks.
[CGFR 67-83, 33 FR 1151, Jan. 27, 1968, as amended by CGD 86-033, 53 FR 36027, Sept. 16, 1988]
Oct 20 , 2015

1 A dditional information Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 2819

Registered Owner Name s :

Hawaiian Electric Companies to include

Hawaiian Electric Company (HECO)

Maui Electric Company (MECO)

Hawaii Electric Light Company (HELCO)

Aircraft Description:

Quadcopter

Aircraft Builder:

DJI

Year Manufactured:

2015

Aircraft Model Designation:

Inspire

Engine Model:

DJI3510

Maximum Weight :

6.5 lbs Registered Owner Name s :

Hawaiian Electric Companies to include

Hawaiian Electric Company (HECO)

Maui Electric Company (MECO)

Hawaii Electric Light Company (HELCO)

Aircraft Description:

Quadcopter

Aircraft Builder:

DJI

Year Manufactured:

2015

Aircraft Model Designation:

Phantom 3 professional DJP3P

Engine Model:

DJI 2312/960KV

Maximum Weight :

2.8 lbs

HECO, MECO, and HELCO, is requesting to add two additional Unmanned Aircraft models

from DJI. See above, full explanation of Unmanned Aircraft we wish to include in our request for

exemption. DJI has already received mu ltiple approvals for Section 333, such as Exemption No

. 11278, 11225, and S 11252

.

There will be no change in the condition and reasons relative to public interest and safety.

None of our operations would change; we are just requesting to add additional Unmanned

Aircraft to our ex emption for greater flexibility.

Thank you for your time, and please direct all questions and concerns to Ms. Joanne

Williamson at Hawaiian Electric Company: joanne.williamson@hawaiianelectric.com
§ 197.404 Responsibilities of the diving supervisor. ( a ) The diving supervisor shall— ( 1 ) Be fully cognizant of the provisions of this subpart;
( 2 ) Be fully cognizant of the provisions of the operations manual required by § 197.420;
( 3 ) Insure that diving operations conducted from a vessel or facility subject to this subpart meet the regulations in this subpart;
( 4 ) Prior to the commencement of any commercial diving operation, provide the report required by § 197.402 to the person-in-charge;
( 5 ) Coordinate with the person-in-charge any changes that are made to the report required by § 197.402; and
( 6 ) Promptly notify the person-in-charge of any diving related casualty, accident, or injury.
( b ) The diving supervisor is in charge of the planning and execution of the diving operation including the responsibility for the safety and health of the dive team.
§ 272.16 Non-compliance with survey requirements. MARAD may disallow any one or more M&R claims otherwise eligible for subsidy if an Operator fails to: ( a ) Contact the appropriate Region Office as required by § 272.14(a);
( b ) Comply with provisions of § 272.14(c)(1) with respect to repair specifications, or to make the vessel reasonably available for inspection before its next sailing; or
( c ) Comply with any other requirement specified in this subpart B.
§ 169.313 Means of escape. ( a ) Except as provided by paragraph (f) of this section, there must be at least two means of escape from all areas generally accessible to persons onboard. At least one means of escape must be independent of watertight doors and lead directly to the open deck. Windows and windshields of sufficient size and proper accessibility may be used as one avenue of escape.
( b ) The two means of escape must be as widely separated as practical to minimize the possibility of one incident blocking both escapes.
( c ) Except as provided by paragraph (d) of this section, a vertical ladder and deck scuttle may not be designated as one of the means of escape.
( d ) A vertical ladder and deck scuttle may be used as a second means of escape if— ( 1 ) The primary means of escape is an enclosed stairtower or stairway;
( 2 ) The installation of two stairways is impracticable;
( 3 ) The scuttle is located where it cannot be interfered with; and
( 4 ) The scuttle is fitted with a quick-acting release and a hold-back to hold the scuttle in an open position.
( e ) The required means of escape must not have locking devices.
( f ) Where the length of the compartment is less than 12 feet, one vertical means of escape is acceptable provided that— ( 1 ) There is no source of fire in the space, such as a galley stove, heater, etc., and the vertical escape is remote from the engine or fuel tank space, and
( 2 ) The arrangement is such that the installation of two means of escape does not materially improve the safety of the vessel or those on board.
( g ) Dead end corridors or the equivalent, more than 40 feet in length are prohibited.
( h ) Each means of escape must be of adequate size to accommodate rapid evacuation.
( i ) Each vertical ladder must have rungs that are: ( 1 ) At least 16 inches in length;
( 2 ) Not more than 12 inches apart, uniform for the length of the ladder;
( 3 ) At least 3 inches from the nearest permanent object in back of the ladder; and
( 4 ) Except when unavoidable obstructions are encountered, there must be at least 41 ⁄ 2 inches clearance above each rung.
[CGD 83-005, 51 FR 896, Jan. 9, 1986, as amended by USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58287, Sept. 29, 2014]
###### Editorial Note on Part 199

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 199 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59789, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 199.600 General.

This subpart sets out specific exemptions and alternatives to requirements in subparts A, B, C, D, and E of this part for vessels not subject to SOLAS.
west virginia department of environmental protection

Appendix C.3

Secondary Organic Aerosol Module

Modifications in CMAQ

Promoting a healthy environment.

WV Regional Haze SIP Appendix C.3 - 1
[This page intentionally left blank.]

WV Regional Haze SIP Appendix C.3 - 2
WV Regional Haze SIP Appendix C.3 - 3
WV Regional Haze SIP Appendix C.3 - 4
WV Regional Haze SIP Appendix C.3 - 5
WV Regional Haze SIP Appendix C.3 - 6
WV Regional Haze SIP Appendix C.3 - 7
WV Regional Haze SIP Appendix C.3 - 8
WV Regional Haze SIP Appendix C.3 - 9
WV Regional Haze SIP Appendix C.3 - 10
WV Regional Haze SIP Appendix C.3 - 11
WV Regional Haze SIP Appendix C.3 - 12
WV Regional Haze SIP Appendix C.3 - 13
WV Regional Haze SIP Appendix C.3 - 14
WV Regional Haze SIP Appendix C.3 - 15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

 SOUTHERN DIVISION 

WANDA JEAN BICKERSTAFF, 

Plaintiff, 

CASE NO. 2:15-CV-10917 

JUDGE DAVID M. LAWSON 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANTHONY P. PATTI 

 v. 

COMMISSIONER OF 

SOCIAL SECURITY, 

Defendant. 

 / 

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SUPPLEMENT HER MARCH 12, 

2015 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT 

PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS (DE 2) 

A. Background 

On March 12, 2015, Wanda Jean Bickerstaff filed a complaint (DE 1 at 1-2) 

for judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s January 30, 2015 

decision.1 On the same day, she also filed an application (DE 2) to proceed in 

 

1 Plaintiff’s social security number appears twice on the first page of the complaint. 

As acknowledged in this Court’s Procedures Governing the Electronic Availability 

and Redaction of Transcripts, “amendments to the Federal Civil and Criminal Rules 

of Procedure that took effect on December 1, 2007, require that personal 

identification information be redacted from documents filed with the court - 

individuals’ Social Security numbers, names of minor children, financial account 

numbers, dates of birth, and, in criminal cases, home addresses.” 

2:15-cv-10917-DML-APP Doc # 4 Filed 04/13/15 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 6
district court without prepaying fees or costs.2

 Although each of these filings was 

electronically filed by attorney Steven V. Harthorn (P47735), attorney Harthorn’s 

signature does not appear on either the complaint or the application. 

B. Discussion 

This case has been referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters. DE 3. 

Having reviewed Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (DE 2), the 

Court concludes that it is not in a position to rule at this time. The form application 

(AO 240) asks for amounts of money, but Plaintiff’s March 12, 2015 application 

(DE 2) does not supply this information. See DE 2 ¶¶ 3, 6 & 8. Moreover, the 

form application asks for the names of those persons dependent upon Plaintiff for 

support, her relationship with each person and how much she contributes to their 

support. However, Plaintiff writes only, “J.B. Tran[s]por[ta]tion to & from 

appointm[illegible] care for son.” See DE 2 ¶ 7. 

C. Order 

Upon consideration, the application to proceed in district court without 

prepaying fees or costs (DE 2) is HELD IN ABEYANCE. Within ten (10) days of 

the date of this order, Plaintiff SHALL file a supplemental application which fully 

answers the questions asked, preferably with the assistance of her counsel. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

2 The civil case filing fee is $400.00. 

2:15-cv-10917-DML-APP Doc # 4 Filed 04/13/15 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 7
Dated: April 13, 2015 s/Anthony P. Patti 

ANTHONY P. PATTI 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record 

on April 13, 2015, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail. 

 s/ Michael Williams 

 Case Manager to the 

 Honorable Anthony P. Patti 

2:15-cv-10917-DML-APP Doc # 4 Filed 04/13/15 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 8
#### § 201.23 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 153

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 153.364 Venting system supports.

Supports for a vent system must meet § 38.10-10(c) of this chapter.
#### WICKHAM HAVENS, INCORPORATED, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MARTIN HAAS AND FRIEDA HAAS, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Submitted May term, 1929

Decided November 14, 1929.

Before Justices Trenchard, Lloyd and Case.

Eor the plaintiff-appellant, *Ilowe & Davis.*

Eor the defendants-respondents, *Michael T. & Hugh G. Barrett.*

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on an instructed verdict for the defendants in the Essex County Circuit Court.

The complaint contained two counts. The first is based on two promissory notes given by the defendants to the plaintiff. The second is based on the failure of the defendants to complete, by paying the balance of the purchase price, the performance of the contract for the purchase of a tract of land by the defendants from the plaintiff. On the trial the court struck out the second count. From that ruling no appeal was taken. The trial then proceeded on the remaining count based on the promissory notes. Defendants’ answer admitted the making of the notes sued upon and set up the defense of fraud in that the plaintiff was alleged to have represented that the notes were not to become due unless title *1036to the real estate was delivered by the plaintiff and accepted by the defendants, and that the defendants had never received title and that the plaintiff had never tendered a deed; and that there was nothing due on the notes. The execution and delivery of the notes having been admitted, plaintiff put the notes in evidence and rested. The defendants thereupon put in their proof tending to support the defense set up in the answer. At the close of the case the court held that there was a failure of consideration; that the contract regarding the sale of the real estate embraced the note transaction; that the plaintiff’s correct method for relief was to sue for a breach of the contract of sale, and the court accordingly directed a verdict for the defendants. Plaintiff alleges error therein and argues the same under point one of the brief.

In the case of *McCormack*v. *Williams,*88 *N. J. L.*170, it was held by the Court of Errors and Appeals (Walker, C.) that our Negotiable Instrument act *(Comp. 8tat., p.*3734) provides in section 24 that every negotiable instrument shall be deemed *prima facie*to have been issued for a valuable consideration, and that every person whose signature appears thereon is deemed to have become a party thereto for value, and that when the plaintiff proved the notes in suit, offered them and rested, he established a *prima facie*case which entitled him to go to the jury. We consider that the instant case is- within that ruling and that the court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant. This conclusion makes it unnecessary to consider the remaining points.

The judgment is therefore reversed.