alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending February 4, 2006

|Filer                               | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | End of Comment Period                             
|----------------------------------- | ------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|Wessagussett Mutual Holding Company | * 3A1* 3A3    | Application by Wessagussett Mutual Holding Company and Wessagussett Bancorp, Inc., both of Weymouth, Massachusetts, to become a mutual bank holding company and a stock bank holding company, respectively (collectively, the Applicants), by acquiring Weymouth Bank, Weymouth, Massachusetts, pursuant to sections 3(a)(1) and 3(a)(3) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:02/27/2006
|Newspaper:                          | Not available
|Federal Register:                   | 02/27/2006   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 23

- 00373

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 271st District Court

Wise County, Texas

Trial Court No

. CV23

- 07

- 483

Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### B ILLY 

### W AYNE 

### W ASS



### , Appellant

V



### .

T ARA 

### L EE 

### M C 

### F ADDEN



### - W ASS 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered appellant ’ s “Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” We grant the

motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 4 2.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered : December 7, 2023
#### § 28.260 Electronic position fixing devices.

Each vessel 79 feet (24 meters) or more in length must be equipped with an electronic position fixing device capable of providing accurate fixes for the area in which the vessel operates.
Retainer Ring
Adjusts Height
of Disk
Assembly

Valve Neck

Seal

Bonnet

Edge of Disk
Caught Under
Lip of Seat

~

SS

Disk
Seat

Figure 2. Borg-Warner Check Valve Shown with
Disk Jammed in Open Position
§ 193.10-15 Piping. ( a ) All piping, valves, and fittings, shall meet the applicable requirements of Subchapter F (Marine Engineering) of this chapter.
( b ) All distribution cut-off valves shall be marked as required by § 196.37-10 of this subchapter.
( c ) For vessels on an international voyage, the diameter of the fire main shall be sufficient for the effective distribution of the maximum required discharge from two fire pumps operating simultaneously. This requirement is in addition to § 193.10-5(c). The discharge of this quantity of water through hoses and nozzles at a sufficient number of adjacent hydrants must be at a minimum Pitot tube pressure of 50 pounds per square inch.
[CGFR 67-83, 33 FR 1145, Jan. 27, 1968, as amended by CGD 75-031, 40 FR 48349, Oct. 15, 1975]
# C_2013225EN.01004802.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/48

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel de Nantes — France) — Adiamix v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances

(Case C-368/12) (1)

1

(Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure - Reference for a preliminary ruling - State aid - Commission Decision declaring an aid scheme incompatible with the common market - Recovery of aid - Assessment of the validity of an EU act - Lack of information on the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred - Manifest inadmissibility)

2013/C 225/84

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour administrative d’appel de Nantes

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Adiamix

Applicant:

Defendant: Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Cour administrative d’appel de Nantes — Validity of Commission Decision 2004/343/EC of 16 December 2003 on the aid scheme implemented by France for the takeover of firms in difficulty (OJ 2004 L 108, p. 38)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel de Nantes (France), by decision of 26 July 2012, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 295, 29.9.2012.

1

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOSEPH F. OLIVARES,

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 15-11630

ANN ARBOR HOUSING COMMISSION, HON. AVERN COHN

TAYLOR HOUSING COMMISSION,

and JOHN CARTER, 

Defendants.

___________________________________/

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO TRANSFER (Doc. 4)

I.

Plaintiff Joseph F. Olivares proceeding pro se, filed a complaint in state court

claiming a violation of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants removed the

case to federal court on the basis of federal question jurisdiction. As best as can be

gleaned from the complaint, plaintiff is a tenant at an Ann Arbor apartment using a

Section 8 voucher issued by the Ann Arbor Housing Commission. He takes issue with

inspections performed at his apartment, claiming they violate his due process rights.

Before the Court is plaintiff’s motion to transfer. (Doc. 4). Plaintiff asks that this

case be transferred to another judge in this district who has a case involving similar

issues, Olivares v. Beth Yaroch and Jennifer Hall, 13-12982. In other words, plaintiff

says the cases are companion. Defendants filed a response, Doc. 5, contending that

the cases are not similar and therefore a transfer is not warranted.

Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. First, reassignment of similar or companion cases

2:15-cv-11630-AC-MJH Doc # 6 Filed 06/19/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 69
is governed by E.D. Mich. LR 83.11(b)(7). Local Rule 83.11 provides that the judges,

not parties, determine whether cases are companion and does not contemplate a party

filing a motion such as the motion plaintiff filed. Second, a review of the complaints in

each case shows that they do not meet the requirements of companion cases.

SO ORDERED.

S/Avern Cohn

AVERN COHN

Dated: June 19, 2015 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 Detroit, Michigan

2

2:15-cv-11630-AC-MJH Doc # 6 Filed 06/19/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 70
#### § 202.8 Oral argument.

Generally, oral argument will not be necessary. However, the Secretary reserves the right to schedule such when he deems it desirable.
# C_2012065EN.01000502.xml

| 3.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/5

---

Appeal brought on 12 December 2011 by Council of the European Union against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 27 September 2011 in Case T-199/04: Gul Ahmed v Council of the European Union, supported by European Commission

(Case C-638/11 P)

2012/C 65/10

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, Agent, G. Berrisch, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Gul Ahmed Textile Mills Ltd, European Commission

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the contested judgment (judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2011 in case T-199/04 in so far as the General Court (i) annulled Regulation (EC) No 397/2004 (1) imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of cotton-type bed linen originating in Pakistan (‘Contested Regulation’) and (ii) ordered the Council to bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the Applicant); |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the contested judgment (judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2011 in case T-199/04 in so far as the General Court (i) annulled Regulation (EC) No 397/2004 (1) imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of cotton-type bed linen originating in Pakistan (‘Contested Regulation’) and (ii) ordered the Council to bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the Applicant);

1

| — | dismiss the third limb of the fifth plea of the Application; |
| --- | --- |

—

dismiss the third limb of the fifth plea of the Application;

| — | refer the case back to the General Court for the remainder of the Application; |
| --- | --- |

—

refer the case back to the General Court for the remainder of the Application;

| — | order the Applicant to pay the costs of the appeal; and |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Applicant to pay the costs of the appeal; and

| — | reserve costs for the proceedings before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

reserve costs for the proceedings before the General Court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Council submits that the General Court erred in finding that the abolition of the previous anti-dumping duties on bed linen from Pakistan and the implementation of a scheme of generalised tariff preferences in favour of Pakistan at the start of 2002 constituted ‘other factors’ within the meaning of Article 3(7) of the Basic Regulation. Consequently, the General Court erred in finding that in the present case the institutions committed a violation of Article 3(7) of the Basic Regulation because they failed to separate and distinguish the alleged injurious effects of these factors.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 397/2004 of 2 March 2004 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of cotton-type bed linen originating in Pakistan

1

OJ L 66, p. 1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,412,902
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             4,700,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 24,562,907
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       7,681,204
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         7,749,015
<LOANS>                                     36,464,131
<ALLOWANCE>                                    366,158
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              76,939,111
<DEPOSITS>                                  68,835,372
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            517,122
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,395,240
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,191,377
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               6,586,617
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,014,428
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,240,761
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                99,157
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,354,346
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,265,832
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,326,944
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,027,402
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  235,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              11,653
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,695,953
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                288,123
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     288,123
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   233,832
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.96
<LOANS-NON>                                     15,508
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               170,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   38,842
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              366,158
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           366,158
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JANE DOE,

Plaintiff,

v.

MAMOUN DABBAGH,

Defendant.

 /

Case No. 15-cv-10724

HONORABLE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III

ORDER TO MEDIATE

It is apparent to the Court that the parties would benefit from mediation. Both parties

have important reputation and privacy interests at stake in the litigation. The Court would

like to give both sides the opportunity to resolve their dispute privately, without the

transparency and publicity that attends litigation. The Court will therefore order the parties

to attend mediation with Patrick Seyferth, from the law firm Bush Seyferth & Page, PLLC,

pursuant to Local Rule 16.4. Upon receipt of this Order, the parties should immediately

contact Mr. Seyferth at seyferth@bsplaw.com.

SO ORDERED.

s/Stephen J. Murphy, III 

STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III

United States District Judge

Dated: February 16, 2016

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or

counsel of record on February 16, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Carol Cohron 

Case Manager

2:15-cv-10724-SJM-EAS Doc # 17 Filed 02/16/16 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 246
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 75 (Thursday, April 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19721-19722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1938]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO-200-0777-XZ-241A]

Notice of Meeting, Front Range Resource Advisory Council 
(Colorado)

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Front Range 
Resource Advisory Council (RAC), will meet as indicated below.

DATES: The meeting will be held May 23, 2007 from 9:15 a.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Holy Cross Abbey Community Center, 2951 E. Highway 50, Canon 
City, Colorado 81212.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken Smith, (719) 269-8500.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15 member Council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of 
planning and management issues associated with public land management 
in the Royal Gorge Field Office and San Luis Valley, Colorado. Planned 
agenda topics include: Manager updates on current land management Plan 
and a briefing on the Ford Creek Project. All meetings are open to the

[[Page 19722]]

public. The public is encouraged to make oral comments to the Council 
at 9:30 a.m. or written statements may be submitted for the Council's 
consideration. Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment 
and time available, the time for individual oral comments may be 
limited. Summary minutes for the Council Meeting will be maintained in 
the Royal Gorge Field Office and will be available for public 
inspection and reproduction during regular business hours within thirty 
(30) days following the meeting. Meeting Minutes and agenda (10 days 
prior to each meeting) are also available at: http://www.blm.gov/rac/co/frrac/co_fr.htm.

    Dated: April 13, 2007.
Roy L. Masinton,
Royal Gorge Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 07-1938 Filed 4-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-M
```
SERVED MARCH 31 , 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

RAYMOND H. FESSLER 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10WP0002 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2010-0020 

DEFIOFIBANSPOiMiON 

> 3 0 

ORDER 

Both parties have submitted their respective positions on Venue. 

WHEREFORE, the submissions having been read and considered it be and is 

hereby ORDERED as follows: 

Venue shall be Pocatello or Boise, ID depending on the availability of court 

facilties. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP10WP0002 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W.*^ 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Eric A, Seitz, Respondent's Attorney 

820 Mililani Street, Suite 714 

Honolulu, HI 96813 

TEL: 808-533-7434 

Christopher I. Merrill, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7105 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building - Room 

2014, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NOS. WR-82,653-01, WR- 82,653-02, 82,653-03 & 82,653-04
EX P ARTE TERRY CLARK SHE LTON, App licant
ON AP P LICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NOS. W09-20518-U(A) , W09-73040-U(A), W10-21198- U(A) & W10-55874- U(A)

IN THE 291 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

ST F ROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code o f C ri m i n al Procedur e, the cl er k o f t h e t ri al court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habea s corpus. E x parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted in four cause s of ag g ravated robbe ry , and sente nced to imprisonment for f ifty y ear s in eac h cause
. The trial c ourt signe d order s desig natingissues on J uly 10, 2014. After 180 day s from the day the writ applications wer e serve d on the State, the writ applications wer e forwa rded to this Court. T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.5. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts which, if true, could entitle him to relief
. We rema

nd theseapplications to the 291 District Court of Dallas County to allow the trial ju d ge t o co m p l et e an st evidentiar y investigation and enter

finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law. These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s of this orde r. A supplemental transcript c ontaining all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, alongwith the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be forwar ded to t his Court withi n 120 day s of the date of this order
. Any extensions of t ime shall be obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: Fe bruar

y 4, 2015 Do not publish
EXHIBIT
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”),
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
      Rick
      Berry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




1. The
      Report
      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/
      RICK
      BERRY


Rick
      Berry


Chief
      Financial Officer








November
      8, 2006




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Sanders Morris Harris Group Inc. and will be retained by Sanders Morris Harris
      Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.1

       Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                     Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of ComBanc, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Jason R. Thornell, AVP/Controller
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                           of 1934, as amended; and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Jason R. Thornell
---------------------
Jason R. Thornell, AVP/Controller

November 12, 2003

                                       24