alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### JENNIE LARKEN, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM, PLAINTIFF, v. EDITH LLOYD ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Submitted January term, 1929

Decided May 8, 1929.

Before Justices Black, Campbell and Case.

Eor the rule, *William, B. Stites.*

Contra, *Michael Breithopf.*

Pee Ctjexam.

This action was brought to recover compensation for personal injuries resulting in the death of plaintiff’s decedent. The injuries occurred to the decedent while he was riding a motorcycle driven by his son along Van Burén Place in the township of North Bergen. The defendant Edith Lloyd was the owner and the defendant Joseph C. Williams was the driver of the automobile which, in collision with the motorcycle, caused the injuries. Negligence of the defendants is alleged in the complaint.

The trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for $7,875. The defendants obtained a rule to show cause and, having filed seven reasons for the granting of a new trial, rely on four of them in their brief. We have considered the points thus argued and the evidence relating thereto but find no substantial reason for disturbing the verdict of the jury.

The rule to show cause is therefore discharged, with costs.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-135402) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-158376) of First Federal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc. of our report dated March 16, 2011 on the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2010 and for year ended December 31, 2010, which includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 
| /s/   BKD, LLP          |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Little   Rock, Arkansas |   |
| March 16,   2011   |   |

 

----
§ 122.510 Emergency instructions. ( a ) The master and crew of a vessel will be familiar with the content of and have mounted at the operating station, emergency instructions containing the actions to be taken in the event of fire, flooding, heavy weather, or man overboard conditions.
( b ) Except when in the judgment of the cognizant OCMI the operation of a vessel does not present one of the hazards listed, the emergency instruction placard should contain at least the applicable portions of the “Emergency Instructions” listed in § 122.512. The emergency instructions must be designed to address the particular equipment, arrangement, and operation of each individual vessel.
( c ) If the cognizant OCMI determines that there is no suitable mounting surface aboard the vessel, the emergency instructions need not be posted but must be carried aboard the vessel and be available to the crew for familiarization.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         535,211                  43,391
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  503,875                 448,015
<ALLOWANCES>                                    34,645                  30,569
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,090,527                 540,138
<PP&E>                                         338,480                 303,634
<DEPRECIATION>                                  88,551                  62,866
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,792,082              10,360,320
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          384,237                 243,414
<BONDS>                                        337,342                 370,697
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                 357,903
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         8,553                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,948,003               8,272,349
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,792,082              10,360,320
<SALES>                                      1,071,008                 785,372
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,071,008                 785,372
<CGS>                                          626,149                 465,776
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  626,149                 465,776
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               156,158                 114,809
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,784                   8,163
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,123                   4,760
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                286,445                 200,548
<INCOME-TAX>                                   139,213                 102,229
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            147,288                  98,319
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   147,288                  98,319
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.17                    0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17                    0.14


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

JEFFREY AARON, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 15-11014 

 Honorable Victoria A. Roberts 

JACKIE DYER, et al., 

 Defendants. 

___________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

FOR TRANSMISSION OF RECORD [Doc. 115] 

On January 12, 2017, a jury returned a verdict in favor of Defendants, finding no 

cause of action. The Court entered Judgment to that effect on January 17. All post-trial 

motions have been resolved, and Plaintiff recently filed a notice of appeal. 

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion for transmission of the trial 

record/transcript. [Doc. 115]. Specifically, Plaintiff seeks a copy of the transcript for jury 

selection proceedings/voir dire. 

The issues Plaintiff raises on appeal are not frivolous, and his appeal is taken in 

good faith. See Foster v. Ludwick, 208 F. Supp. 2d 750, 765 (E.D. Mich. 2002) (“good 

faith” requires showing that the issues are arguable on the merits and not frivolous; it 

does not require a showing of probable success on the merits). 

The jury selection proceedings are at the heart of Plaintiff’s appeal, and the 

transcript of those proceedings is necessary for resolution of Plaintiff’s appeal. Plaintiff, 

however, cannot afford to order the jury selection transcript. 

Because the transcript of jury selection proceedings is necessary to decide the 

issues on appeal, and Plaintiff’s appeal is taken in good faith and is not frivolous, the 
2 

Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for transmission of the record [Doc. 115] and 

ORDERS that the transcript be furnished at the government’s expense. 

IT IS ORDERED. 

 S/Victoria A. Roberts 

 Victoria A. Roberts 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: October 23, 2017
# C_2011113EN.01001502.xml

| 9.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/15

---

Action brought on 3 February 2011 — Sogepi Consulting y Publicidad v OHIM (ESPETEC)

(Case T-72/11)

2011/C 113/31

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sogepi Consulting y Publicidad, SL (Vic, Spain) (represented by J.P. de Oliveira Vaz Miranda Sousa, T. Barceló Rebaque and N. Esteve Manasanch, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant requests the Court to:

| — | annul and revoke the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 November 2010, in Case R 312/2010-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul and revoke the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 November 2010, in Case R 312/2010-2;

| — | as a consequence allow registration of Community trade mark No 7.114.572 ‘ESPETEC’; and |
| --- | --- |

—

as a consequence allow registration of Community trade mark No 7.114.572 ‘ESPETEC’; and

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘ESPETEC’, for goods in Class 29

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Refusal of the mark applied for

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1), since the term ‘ESPETEC’ is not devoid of distinctive character when considered independently of the goods applied for and infringement of Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 given the distortion and incorrect assessment of the evidence of use on the market of the mark ‘ESPETEC’.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1)

1

---
2:15-cr-20241-AJT-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 09/05/14 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 1
2:15-cr-20241-AJT-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 09/05/14 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 2
2:15-cr-20241-AJT-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 09/05/14 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 3
Case 2:15-cv-11660-RHC-RSW   ECF No. 1-1   filed 05/08/15    PageID.6    Page 1 of 19

Case 2:15-cv-11660-RHC-RSW   ECF No. 1-1   filed 05/08/15    PageID.7    Page 2 of 19

Case 2:15-cv-11660-RHC-RSW   ECF No. 1-1   filed 05/08/15    PageID.8    Page 3 of 19

Case 2:15-cv-11660-RHC-RSW   ECF No. 1-1   filed 05/08/15    PageID.9    Page 4 of 19

Case 2:15-cv-11660-RHC-RSW   ECF No. 1-1   filed 05/08/15    PageID.10    Page 5 of 19

Case 2:15-cv-11660-RHC-RSW   ECF No. 1-1   filed 05/08/15    PageID.11    Page 6 of 19

Case 2:15-cv-11660-RHC-RSW   ECF No. 1-1   filed 05/08/15    PageID.12    Page 7 of 19

Case 2:15-cv-11660-RHC-RSW   ECF No. 1-1   filed 05/08/15    PageID.13    Page 8 of 19

Case 2:15-cv-11660-RHC-RSW   ECF No. 1-1   filed 05/08/15    PageID.14    Page 9 of 19

Case 2:15-cv-11660-RHC-RSW   ECF No. 1-1   filed 05/08/15    PageID.15    Page 10 of 19

Case 2:15-cv-11660-RHC-RSW   ECF No. 1-1   filed 05/08/15    PageID.16    Page 11 of 19

Case 2:15-cv-11660-RHC-RSW   ECF No. 1-1   filed 05/08/15    PageID.17    Page 12 of 19

Case 2:15-cv-11660-RHC-RSW   ECF No. 1-1   filed 05/08/15    PageID.18    Page 13 of 19

Case 2:15-cv-11660-RHC-RSW   ECF No. 1-1   filed 05/08/15    PageID.19    Page 14 of 19

Case 2:15-cv-11660-RHC-RSW   ECF No. 1-1   filed 05/08/15    PageID.20    Page 15 of 19

Case 2:15-cv-11660-RHC-RSW   ECF No. 1-1   filed 05/08/15    PageID.21    Page 16 of 19

Case 2:15-cv-11660-RHC-RSW   ECF No. 1-1   filed 05/08/15    PageID.22    Page 17 of 19

Case 2:15-cv-11660-RHC-RSW   ECF No. 1-1   filed 05/08/15    PageID.23    Page 18 of 19

Case 2:15-cv-11660-RHC-RSW   ECF No. 1-1   filed 05/08/15    PageID.24    Page 19 of 19
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2330 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to carry out a study to determine 

the suitability and feasibility of establishing Camp Hale as a unit of 

the National Park System. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2009 

Mr. LAMBORN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to carry out a study 

to determine the suitability and feasibility of establishing 

Camp Hale as a unit of the National Park System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Camp Hale Study 

5 Act’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2330 IH

1 SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY OF THE SUITABILITY 

2 AND FEASIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING CAMP 

3 HALE AS A UNIT OF THE NATIONAL PARK 

4 SYSTEM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior, act6 ing through the Director of the National Park Service 

7 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Secretary’’), shall com8 plete a special resource study of Camp Hale to deter9 mine— 

10 (1) the suitability and feasibility of designating 

11 Camp Hale as a separate unit of the National Park 

12 System; and 

13 (2) the methods and means for the protection 

14 and interpretation of Camp Hale by the National 

15 Park Service, other Federal, State, or local govern16 ment entities or private or nonprofit organizations. 

17 (b) STUDY REQUIREMENTS.—The Secretary shall 

18 conduct the study in accordance with section 8(c) of Pub19 lic Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5(c)). 

20 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date 

21 on which funds are made available to carry out this Act, 

22 the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Natural 

23 Resources of the House of Representatives and the Com24 mittee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate 

25 a report containing— 

26 (1) the results of the study; and 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2330 IH

1 (2) any recommendations of the Secretary. 

2 SEC. 3. EFFECT OF STUDY. 

3 Nothing in this Act shall affect valid existing rights 

4 or the exercise of such rights, including— 

5 (1) all interstate water compacts in existence on 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act (including full 

7 development of any apportionment made in accord8 ance with the compacts); 

9 (2) water rights decreed at the Camp Hale site 

10 or flowing within, below, or through the Camp Hale 

11 site; 

12 (3) water rights in the State of Colorado; 

13 (4) water rights held by the United States; 

14 (5) the management and operation of any res15 ervoir, including the storage, management, release, 

16 or transportation of water; and 

17 (6) the ability, subject to compliance with law18 ful existing local, State, and Federal regulatory re19 quirements, to construct and operate that infrastruc20 ture determined necessary by those with decreed 

21 water rights to develop and place to beneficial use 

22 such rights. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Powerhouse Technologies Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Greg Duffell, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Greg Duffell
----------------------------
Greg Duffell, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
April 19, 2004
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 9
Federal Reserve Bank of: Minneapolis

## Filings received during the week ending May 6, 2006

|Filer                 | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                    | End of Comment Period                              
|--------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|PLAZA PARK STATE BANK | * Branch       | Plaza Park State Bank, Waite Park, Minnesota, to establish a branch at Northwest Professional Center, 2351 Connecticut Avenue, Sartell, Minnesota. | Newspaper:04/28/2006Federal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:            | 04/28/2006    
|Federal Register:     | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
* * We grant Kona Associates L.L.C. ’ s request for amendment of the exemption granted by Order 2004

- 8

- 8, to the extent necessary to increase the number of members allowed to participate in the Kona Shuttle program from 120 to 150

. Except to the e xtent authorized here, t he authority granted remains subject to the condi tions of Order 2004

- 8

- 8. Approved under assigned authority on May 2 , 201 4 **

Director, Office of International Aviation
U.S. Geological Survey

ASIA

Satellite Image Atlas

of Glaciers of the World

Professional Paper 1386 – F
Cover: A Landsat MSS false-color composite image of the ice caps on 

Northern Savernaya Zemlya, Russian High Arctic, acquired 22 July 1975. 

The 5,575 square kilometer Lednik Akademii Nauk (upper right) is the 

largest ice cap in the archipelago. See page F101.
Williams and Ferrigno, Eds. – Satellite Image Atlas of Glaciers of the World ASIA – USGS / PP 1386 – F
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.171-3 Incorporation by reference. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76702 , Sept. 18, 2024.
( a ) Certain materials are incorporated by reference into this subchapter with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. The Office of the Federal Register publishes a table, “Material Approved for Incorporation by Reference,” which appears in the Finding Aids section of this volume. In that table is found citations to the particular sections of this part where the material is incorporated. To enforce any edition other than the one listed in paragraph (b) of this section, notice of change must be published in the Federal Register and the material made available. All approved material is on file at the Office of the Federal Register, Washington, DC 20408, and at Coast Guard Headquarters. Contact Commandant (CG-ENG-4), Attn: Lifesaving and Fire Safety Division, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509.
( b ) The materials approved for incorporation by reference in this subpart are:
American Society for Testing and Materials *100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.* ASTM B 117-97, Standard Practice for Operating Salt Spray (Fog) Apparatus—160.171-17 ASTM C 177-85 (1993), Standard Test Method for Steady-State Heat Flux Measurements and Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Guarded-Hot-Plate Apparatus—160.171-17 ASTM C 518-91, Standard Test Method for Steady-State Heat Flux Measurements and Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus—160.171-17 ASTM D 975-98, Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel Oils—160.171-17 ASTM D 1004-94a, Standard Test Method for Initial Tear Resistance of Plastic Film and Sheeting—160.171-17 Federal Standards Specification Unit (WFSIA) *Regional Office Building, Room 6039, 7th and D Streets SW, Washington, DC 20407.* National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 440—Color, Universal Language and Dictionary of Names; December 1976. Federal Test Method Standard No. 191a dated July 20, 1978, Method 5304.1, Abrasion Resistance of Cloth, Oscillatory Cylinder (Wyzenbeek) Method, dated July 9, 1971. Federal Standard No. 751a, Stitches, Seams, and Stitchings, dated January 25, 1965. Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. *12 Laboratory Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3995.* UL 1191, First Edition (Standard for Components for Personal Flotation Devices), as revised March 29, 1977.
[CGD 84-069a, 52 FR 1188, Jan. 12, 1987, as amended by CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50467, Sept. 29, 1995; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50733, Sept. 27, 1996; CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51048, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-1999-5151, 64 FR 67184, Dec. 1, 1999; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49237, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60159, Sept. 30, 2013]
###### Editorial Note on Part 287

#### Editorial Note:

The regulations contained in this part were codified by the Internal Revenue Service in Treasury Decision 6820, 30 FR 6030, Apr. 29, 1965. For text see also 26 CFR part 2.

#### § 287.25 Assessment and collection of deficiencies.

Any additional tax, including the 1.1 percent amount imposed by section 511(i) of the Act, due on account of withdrawal from a construction reserve fund, or failure to comply with section 511 of the Act or the regulations in this part, is collectible as a deficiency. Interest upon such deficiency will run from the date the withdrawal or noncompliance occurs. The amount of any deficiency, including interest and additions to the tax, determined as a result of such withdrawal or noncompliance, may be assessed, or a proceeding in court for the collection thereof may be begun without assessment, at any time and without regard to any period of limitations or any other provisions of law or rule of law, including the doctrine of res judicata.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26412-26413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2299]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the 
Neurotransporters, Receptors, and Calcium Signaling Study Section, June 
7, 2007, 8:30 a.m. to June 8, 2007, 5 p.m., Grand Hyatt San Francisco, 
345 Stockton Street, San Francisco, CA 94108 which was published in the 
Federal Register on April 20, 2007, 72 FR 19941-19942.
    The meeting will be held on June 7, 2007, 8:30 a.m. to 7 p.m. The 
meeting location remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.


[[Page 26413]]


    Dated: May 2, 2007.
Judith Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2299 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
5:14-cr-20804-JCO-DRG Doc # 20 Filed 01/23/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 184
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 37

 38

★ 39

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/26

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.97 N 77.02 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■ ■

■ ■

★

●

●

●

●

★

● ● ●

●