alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael C. Frederick,
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of
and for the period covered by the Report.

DATE: August 14, 2003                 BY: /s/ Michael C. Frederick
      ------------------                  -----------------------
                                          Michael C. Frederick
                                          Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
                                            Officer and Treasurer
                                          (Principal Financial and Accounting
                                            Officer)






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to First Capital, Inc. and will be retained by First Capital, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.283 Valving for cargo piping. ( a ) Except as described in this section, a cargo line must have a deck operable, manual stop valve: ( 1 ) In each tank which the line serves; and
( 2 ) At each cargo hose connection point.
( b ) The valve required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section may be in a cargo pumproom at the pumproom bulkhead if the cargo tank the cargo line serves is adjacent to the pumproom.
( c ) The valve required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section may be on the weatherdeck if: ( 1 ) The weatherdeck is the top of the tank;
( 2 ) The line goes through the weatherdeck into the tank; and
( 3 ) The valve is at the point where the line penetrates the weatherdeck.
( d ) The valve required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section may be outside the tank if: ( 1 ) The tank is an independent tank; and
( 2 ) The valve is at the point where the line penetrates the tank.
( e ) The discharge line of an intank cargo pump need not have the valve required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( f ) If the cargo exerts a gravity head pressure on a valve required by this section, the valve must be a positive shutoff valve that meets § 56.50-60(d) of this chapter.
[CGD 73-96, 42 FR 49027, Sept. 26, 1977, as amended by CGD 78-128, 47 FR 21208, May 17, 1982]
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 1 of 39 Pg ID 1
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 2 of 39 Pg ID 2
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 3 of 39 Pg ID 3
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 4 of 39 Pg ID 4
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 5 of 39 Pg ID 5
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 6 of 39 Pg ID 6
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 7 of 39 Pg ID 7
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 8 of 39 Pg ID 8
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 9 of 39 Pg ID 9
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 10 of 39 Pg ID 10
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 11 of 39 Pg ID 11
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 12 of 39 Pg ID 12
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 13 of 39 Pg ID 13
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 14 of 39 Pg ID 14
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 15 of 39 Pg ID 15
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 16 of 39 Pg ID 16
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 17 of 39 Pg ID 17
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 18 of 39 Pg ID 18
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 19 of 39 Pg ID 19
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 20 of 39 Pg ID 20
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 21 of 39 Pg ID 21
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 22 of 39 Pg ID 22
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 23 of 39 Pg ID 23
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 24 of 39 Pg ID 24
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 25 of 39 Pg ID 25
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 26 of 39 Pg ID 26
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 27 of 39 Pg ID 27
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 28 of 39 Pg ID 28
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 29 of 39 Pg ID 29
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 30 of 39 Pg ID 30
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 31 of 39 Pg ID 31
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 32 of 39 Pg ID 32
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 33 of 39 Pg ID 33
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 34 of 39 Pg ID 34
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 35 of 39 Pg ID 35
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 36 of 39 Pg ID 36
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 37 of 39 Pg ID 37
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 38 of 39 Pg ID 38
2:14-cv-14772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 12/17/14 Pg 39 of 39 Pg ID 39
INDEX OF EXHIBITS

1. Request for tax clearance for Southwest Metals

2. “Crackdown in a Detroit Stripped of Metal Parts,” New York Times, March 

15, 2015

3. “Scrappers Decimate Detroit’s Southwestern High School Just Two Years 

After it Closed,” MLive, March 13, 2014

4. “Scrappers Take Anything of Value from DPS Sites,” Detroit News, 

November 10, 2010

5. “9 Ways Scrappers are Destroying Detroit Area,” Motor City Muckraker, 

April 11, 2014

6. Scrap Metal Regulatory Act, MCL 445.421 – 445.443

7. Chapter 49, Article 8 of the Detroit City Code, sections 49-8-1 through 49-8-

28

8. DPD report re Case No. 1207300394

9. DPD report re Case No. 1209030248

10. DPD report re Case No. 1208280280

11. DPD Report re Case No. 1301030071

12. DPD Investigator’s Report re Case No. 1305050069 and related documents

13. DPD Report re Case No. 1309200268

14. DPD report re Case No. 1403210278

15. DPD Investigator’s Report prepared on or about March 21, 2014 involving 

tipster

16. DPD report re Case No. 140321020278

Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16, PageID.347 Filed 04/07/15 Page 1 of 3
17. DPD report re Case No. 1408070309

18. DPD report re Case No. 1409040312

19. DPD Investigator’s Report re Case No. 1411070300.6

20. DPD report re Case No. 1502090237

21. Detroit Police Department summary noting that in 9 out of 20 total cases 

involving the sale of stolen non-ferrous metals in 2014, the sellers stated that 

the sold to Southwest Metals and/or the investigation eventually led to 

Southwest Metals. 

22.Proposed Pre-Hearing Conference Summary, describing 24 separate incidents 

involving various legal violations occurring at Southwest Metals since 2011

23.BSEED letter dated March 31, 2014 noting City’s intent to revoke Southwest 

Metal’s business license 

24.BSEED letter dated March 31, 2014 noting City’s intent to revoke Southwest 

Metal’s business license

25. Emerald Casino, Inc. v Jaffe, 2005 U.S. Dist LEXIS 24261 (N.D. Ill Oct. 17, 

2005)

26. Upfront Tavern & Grill v City of Chicago, 1994 U.S. Dist LEXIS 6780

27. Sergeant McKay summary of police activity in 2014

28.Khan v City of Flint, 2010 Mich App LEXIS 2340, at pages *10 - *12, 

reversed on other grounds, 490 Mich 851 (2011)

29. Stoll v City of Detroit, 2002 Mich App LEXIS 426

30. Big Valley Corp. v Weinrib, 1997 Mont. Dist. LEXIS 650 (Mont Dist. Ct. 

1997)

31.Police reports regarding arrests of James Pratt of Lafayette Recycling and 

Marshall Wilson of Detroit Iron & Metal

Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16, PageID.348 Filed 04/07/15 Page 2 of 3
32. Letters of notice of intent to revoke or decline to renew business licenses of 

Lafayette Recycling, Detroit Iron & Metal, and Basic Recycling

Case 2:15-cv-11080-MOB-APP ECF No. 16, PageID.349 Filed 04/07/15 Page 3 of 3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 -0649 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TYLER FREDERICK ERICKSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 21, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 15 2022

08/15/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0649
#### Abram L. Soudder, *Appellant, v.*Almon T. Burrows, *Respondent*.

Order affirmed, with the dollars' costs and disbursements. Mem. by

Landon, J.
Editorial Note on Part 199
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 199 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59789, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 199.202 Rescue boats. ( a ) Each passenger vessel of 500 tons gross tonnage and over must carry on each side of the vessel at least one rescue boat approved under approval series 160.156 that is equipped as specified in table 199.175 of this part.
( b ) Each passenger vessel of less than 500 tons gross tonnage must carry at least one rescue boat approved under approval series 160.156 that is equipped as specified in table 199.175 of this part.
( c ) A lifeboat is accepted as a rescue boat if, in addition to being approved under approval series 160.135, it is also approved under approval series 160.156.
#### Anthera Manufacturing Company, *Respondent, v.*William H. Burton and another, *Appellants.*

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to abide event.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.132-21 Operation and maintenance instructions. ( a ) Each davit must have operation and maintenance instructions that— ( 1 ) Follows the general format and content specified in IMO MSC.1 Circ. 1205 (incorporated by reference, see § 160.132-5 of this subpart); and
( 2 ) Includes a checklist for use in monthly, external visual inspections of the davit.
( b ) The davit manufacturer must make the manual required by paragraph (a) of this section available in English to the purchaser of a davit approved by the Coast Guard.
( c ) The operation and maintenance instructions required by paragraph (a) of this section may be combined with similar material for survival craft and rescue boats, and their complete launching systems.
# C_2014462EN.01002101.xml

| 22.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 November 2014 — Volvo Trademark v OHIM — Hebei Aulion Heavy Industries (LOVOL)

(Case T-525/11) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark LOVOL - Earlier Community word and figurative marks and earlier national figurative marks VOLVO - Relative ground for refusal - Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2014/C 462/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Volvo Trademark Holding AB (Gothenburg, Sweden) (represented by: M. Treis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Hebei Aulion Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (Zhangjiakou, China) (represented by: A. Alejos Cutuli, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 June 2011 (Case R 1868/2010-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Volvo Trademark Holding AB and Hebei Aulion Heavy Industries Co., Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Volvo Trademark Holding AB to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Volvo Trademark Holding AB to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 355, 3.12.2011.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEPTEMBER
30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,761
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   296
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     18,402
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         41,651
<ALLOWANCE>                                        623
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  65,803
<DEPOSITS>                                      58,174
<SHORT-TERM>                                       183
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                534
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,193
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,719
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  65,803
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,232
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  644
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    51
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,927
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,342
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,352
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,575
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      127
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (1)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,414
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,124
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,124
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       814
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.07
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       336
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   508
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       99
<RECOVERIES>                                        86
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  622
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               622
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            622


</TABLE>
#### Isaac S. Newton, *Respondent, v.*Birdsell Yale, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Boardman, J.;

Landon, J., dissenting. *<*
EXHIBIT 13.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report for Fiscal 2008 Ended December 31, 2008 of Portrush Petroleum Corporation, a company organized under the British Columbia Corporations Act(the Company) on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Martin Cotter, President/CEO/CFO and Director of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or

15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and result of operations

of the Company.



/s/ Martin Cotter

Martin Cotter, President/CEO/CFO/Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

(Principal Financial Officer)



Date: June 23, 2009
§ 180.71 Life jackets. ( a ) An adult life jacket must be provided for each person carried on board a vessel.
( b ) In addition, a number of child size life jackets equal to at least 10% of the number of persons permitted on board must be provided, or such greater number as necessary to provide a life jacket for each person being carried that is smaller than the lower size limit of the adult life jackets provided to meet this section, except that: ( 1 ) Child-size life jackets are not required if the vessel's Certificate of Inspection is endorsed for the carriage of adults only; or
( 2 ) When all “extended size” life preservers (those with a lower size limit for persons of 1,195 millimeters (47 inches) in height or weighing 20.4 kilograms (45 pounds)) are carried on board, a minimum of only 5% additional child size devices need be carried.
( c ) Except as allowed by paragraph (d) of this section, each life jacket must be approved in accordance with either § 160.002, § 160.005, or § 160.055 in subchapter Q of this chapter, or other standard specified by the Commandant, including, but not limited to, approval series 160.155 or 160.176.
( d ) Cork and balsa wood life jackets previously approved in accordance with § 106.003, or 160.004 in subchapter Q of this section, on board an existing vessel prior to March 11, 1996, may continue to be used to meet the requirements of this section until March 11, 1999, provided the life jackets are maintained in good and serviceable condition.
( e ) Each life jacket carried on board the vessel must be marked in accordance with § 185.604 of this chapter.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 975, Jan. 10, 1996; 61 FR 24464, May 15, 1996, as amended by CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51050, Sept. 30, 1997; 62 FR 51357, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2015-0867, 80 FR 62470, Oct. 16, 2015]
# C_2012025EN.01006904.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/69

---

Action brought on 7 November 2011 — ZZ v European Commission

(Case F-116/11)

(2012/C 25/135)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: A. Salerno, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to admit the applicant to the assessment tests under EPSO competition EPSO/AD/207/11.

Forms of order sought

| — | annul the contested decision, |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision,

| — | order the Commission to pay the applicant EUR 10 000 by way of compensation for non-pecuniary damage as a result of the contested decision. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the applicant EUR 10 000 by way of compensation for non-pecuniary damage as a result of the contested decision.

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
Meeting with the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association with EPA 

Purpose: To Discuss Proposed Modifications to IUR rule

October 5, 2010

Attendees: Jim Cooper, NPRA; Jeff Gunnulfsen, NPRA, Ward Penberthy, EPA; Jim 

Willis, EPA; Sara Hisel-McCoy, EPA; Karen Hoffman, EPA

On October 5, 2010, EPA met with the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association (NPRA) 

to discuss some of the proposed modifications to the Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule. 

NPRA is a national trade association that represents U.S. refiners and petrochemical 

manufacturers. During the meeting, EPA answered questions that clarified several of the 

proposed requirements. Topics discussed include: the IUR electronic reporting software and the 

opportunity for testing and training; whether the Agency considered proposing the optional 

(instead of mandatory) use of the reporting tool; the dynamic nature of chemicals manufactured 

in the U.S. and its effect on production volume from year to year. For the reporting of processing 

and use information, NPRA commented on the burden associated with eliminating the 300,000 

lb. reporting threshold and the replacement of the "readily obtainable" reporting standard with 

the more stringent "known to or reasonably ascertainable by" reporting standard.

________________________
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2090 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 431 State Street in Ogdensburg, New York, 

as the ‘‘Frederic Remington Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

HR 2090 RFS

1 SECTION 1. FREDERIC REMINGTON POST OFFICE BUILD2 ING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 431 State Street in Ogdensburg, 

5 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Fred6 eric Remington Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Frederic Remington 

11 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS