alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.11


Summary of Guaranty  Contract of Maximum Amount by and among Longgang  Division,
Shenzhen  Branch,  Agricultural  Bank of  China,  Development  and  Construction
(Group)  Company  Limited by Shares  ("Changchun  Co") of  Changchun  Economic &
Technology  Development  District,  Jilin Provincial  Huaruan Technology Company
Limited by Shares  ("Huaruan  Company")  and  Xiangqian  Li dated as of April 5,
2004.

         Changchun Co, Huaruan  Company and Mr. Li signed a guaranty on April 5,
2004  in  relation  to  the  Comprehensive   Credit  Facilities  Agreement  (the
"Agreement") as summarized in Exhibit 10.10. As guarantor, Changchun Co, Huaruan
Company and Mr. Li undertake to assume  joint and several  responsibilities  for
the obligation of Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd. under the Agreement, subject to
the maximum security  amounts of RMB 100,000,000  Yuan, RMB 100,000,000 Yuan and
RMB 200,000,000  Yuan,  respectively.  The guaranty has a term of two (2) years,
commencing  from the  maturity of the  obligations  of Shenzhen BAK Battery Co.,
Ltd. under the Agreement.
EXHIBIT 10.1 



Summary of Hudson
Highland Group, Inc. 2005 Incentive Compensation Program 



The following is a summary of the
material terms of the Hudson Highland Group, Inc. (the “Company”) 2005
Incentive CompensationProgram:  



	• 	The
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company annually sets bonus
performance targets to reflect the growth in the Company’s earnings before income
tax, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) year over year. EBITDA is
calculated net of bonuses payable under the program. 






	• 	The
bonus payable to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer will be equal to 2% of the
Company’s EBITDA, but will be payable only if the EBITDA performance target for the
Company is achieved. 






	• 	The
bonuses payable to the Company’s business unit heads will be paid upon the
achievement of EBITDA performance targets for their respective business areas (80%) and
the Company (20%). Bonuses for achievement in excess of the target will be paid equal to
2% of their respective business unit’s EBITDA. There will not be a cap on the amount
of the bonuses payable to the heads of the Company’s business units. 






	• 	The
bonuses payable to the executive officers of the Company (other than the Chief Executive
Officer) will be paid based on the achievement of an EBITDA performance target for the
Company. The bonus payable to individual executive officers of the Company (other than
the Chief Executive Officer) will be capped at 200% of such executive officer’s
respective targeted annual bonus. 






	•  	Except
with respect to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, 50% of the targeted bonus for
each participant will be paid if threshold levels of the EBITDA performance targets are
achieved.
#### Alexander M. Holmes, *Respondent, v.*D. Sackett Moore, *as Administrator, etc., Appellant.*

Four cases; judgment affirmed, in each, with costs. Order appealed from affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements in each. Opinion by

Bockes, J.
#### § 13.129 Quick-reference table for tankerman endorsements.

Table 1 to [§ 13.129](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-13.129) provides a guide to the requirements for various tankerman endorsements. Provisions in the reference sections are controlling.

Table 1 to [§ 13.129](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-13.129)

| Category | Minimum age | Physical required | Service | Recency of service | Proof of service | Firefighting | Cargo training | English language |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Tankerman-PIC Subpart B | 18; 13.201(a) | Yes; Part 10, subpart C | 13.203 | 13.123 | 13.205 | 13.201(c)(3) | 13.201(c)(4) | 13.201(d). |
| Tankerman-PIC (Barge) Subpart C | 18; 13.301(a) | Yes; Part 10, subpart C | 13.303 | 13.123 | 13.305 | 13.301(c)(3) | 13.301(c)(4) | 13.301(d). |
| Tankerman-Assistant Subpart D | 18; 13.401(a) | Yes; Part 10, subpart C | 13.401(e)(2) | 13.123 | 13.405 | 13.401(d) | 13.401(e)(1) | 13.401(f). |
| Tankerman-Engineer Subpart E | 18; 13.501(a) | Yes; Part 10, subpart C | 13.503 | 13.123 | 13.505 | 13.501(c)(3) | 13.501(c)(4) | 13.501(d). |
| Restricted Tankerman-PIC | 18; 13.111(b) | Yes; Part 10, subpart C | 13.111(b) | 13.111(b) | 13.111(b) | 13.111(b) | No | 13.111(b). |
| Restricted Tankerman-PIC (Barge) | 18; 13.111(c) | Yes; Part 10, subpart C | 13.111(c) | 13.111(c) | 13.111(c) | 13.111(c) | No | 13.111(c). |
| Restricted Tankerman-PIC (Barge), Facility | 18; 13.111(d)(1) | Yes; Part 10, subpart C | 13.111(d)(4) | No | 13.111(d)(4) | No | No | 13.111(d)(5). |

[USCG-2004-17914, [78 FR 77995](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/78-FR-77995), Dec. 24, 2013]
[Letterhead of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.]
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3


                        REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We have examined the accompanying management's assertion that, as of December
31, 1997, Bank One, Texas, N.A. maintained effective internal control over the
servicing of motor vehicle retail installment sale contracts for the Banc One
Auto Grantor Trust 1996-A.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
obtaining an understanding of the internal control over the loan servicing
process, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of the
internal control, and such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, errors or
irregularities may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any
evaluation of the internal control over the loan servicing process to future
periods are subject to the risk that the internal control may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies and procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Bank One, Texas, N.A. maintained
effective internal control over the servicing of motor vehicle retail
installment sale contracts for the Banc One Auto Grantor Trust 1996-A as of
December 31, 1997, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based upon
criteria established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO) as described in Internal Control--Integrated
Framework.

                                                     /s/Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.



Columbus, Ohio
March 27, 1998



<PAGE>




                       Assertion by Bank One, Texas, N.A.




Bank One, Texas, N.A. services the motor vehicle retail installment sale
contracts for the Banc One Auto Grantor Trust 1996-A. Bank One, Texas, N.A.
maintained effective internal control over the loan servicing for the Banc One
Auto Grantor Trust 1996-A as of December 31, 1997, based upon criteria
established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO) as described in Internal Control--Integrated Framework.










/s/Jeff Stewart              /s/Paul H. Jones        /s/Joseph A. Pietrangelo
--------------------------   --------------------    ---------------------------
Jeff Stewart                 Paul H. Jones           Joseph A. Pietrangelo
Divisional Controller        National Consumer Loan  Senior Vice President
Southern Region Accounting   Servicing Manager       National Operations Manager
# C_2009134DE.01004402.xml

| 13.6.2009 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 134/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2009

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 134/44

---

Berichtigung der Stellungnahme der Europäischen Zentralbank vom 6. Januar 2009 zu einem Vorschlag für eine Verordnung des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über grenzüberschreitende Zahlungen in der Gemeinschaft (CON/2009/1)

(

  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 21 vom 28. Januar 2009

  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 21 vom 28. Januar 2009

Seite 2, Nummer 1.2:

anstatt:

| „1.2. | Aus der Entwicklung von SEPA ergibt sich, dass Systeme zur Meldung von Zahlungsbilanzdaten, die hauptsächlich auf Zahlungsverkehrsdaten basieren, im Hinblick auf Zahlungen in Euro innerhalb der EU nicht in ihrer derzeitigen Form weitergeführt werden können. Die Reform dieser Systeme könnte nicht nur wesentlich geringere Berichtspflichten für Banken beinhalten, sondern auch eine Erhöhung der Berichtslast für Nichtbanken, die so weit wie möglich beschränkt werden sollte (z.B. durch die Anwendung ordnungsgemäßer Umfrage- und Stichprobenverfahren). ...“ |
| --- | --- |

„1.2.

Aus der Entwicklung von SEPA ergibt sich, dass Systeme zur Meldung von Zahlungsbilanzdaten, die hauptsächlich auf Zahlungsverkehrsdaten basieren, im Hinblick auf Zahlungen in Euro innerhalb der EU nicht in ihrer derzeitigen Form weitergeführt werden können. Die Reform dieser Systeme könnte nicht nur wesentlich geringere Berichtspflichten für Banken beinhalten, sondern auch eine Erhöhung der Berichtslast für Nichtbanken, die so weit wie möglich beschränkt werden sollte (z.B. durch die Anwendung ordnungsgemäßer Umfrage- und Stichprobenverfahren). ...“

muss es heißen:

| „1.2. | Aus der Entwicklung von SEPA ergibt sich, dass Systeme zur Meldung von Zahlungsbilanzdaten, die hauptsächlich auf Zahlungsverkehrsdaten basieren, im Hinblick auf Zahlungen in Euro innerhalb der EU nicht in ihrer derzeitigen Form weitergeführt werden können. Die Reform dieser Systeme könnte nicht nur wesentlich geringere Berichtspflichten für Banken beinhalten (1), sondern auch eine Erhöhung der Berichtslast für Nichtbanken, die so weit wie möglich beschränkt werden sollte (z. B. durch die Anwendung ordnungsgemäßer Umfrage- und Stichprobenverfahren). ... |
| --- | --- |

„1.2.

Aus der Entwicklung von SEPA ergibt sich, dass Systeme zur Meldung von Zahlungsbilanzdaten, die hauptsächlich auf Zahlungsverkehrsdaten basieren, im Hinblick auf Zahlungen in Euro innerhalb der EU nicht in ihrer derzeitigen Form weitergeführt werden können. Die Reform dieser Systeme könnte nicht nur wesentlich geringere Berichtspflichten für Banken beinhalten (1), sondern auch eine Erhöhung der Berichtslast für Nichtbanken, die so weit wie möglich beschränkt werden sollte (z. B. durch die Anwendung ordnungsgemäßer Umfrage- und Stichprobenverfahren). ...

---

(1)  Im Einklang mit Artikel 1 Absatz 3 des Verordnungsvorschlags werden Banken dennoch verpflichtet sein, über ihre eigenen grenzüberschreitenden finanziellen und nichtfinanziellen Transaktionen zu berichten.“

1

---
EXHIBIT 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        I, Harry Masuda, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Hyperbaric Systems on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Hyperbaric Systems.

Date: August 14, 2002                   By:  /s/ Harry Masuda
                                        ----------------------------
                                        Name:    Harry Masuda
                                        Title:   Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, CRIMINAL NO. 14-20724 

v. HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH

WASFI HADDAD, 

Defendant.

 /

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S LETTER REQUEST

FOR A RECONSIDERATION OF SENTENCE

Following the entry of judgment in this case, defendant’s attorney forwarded a

letter asking for the court to consider a sentence that would allow defendant to work and

ultimately avoid a term of confinement pursuant to 7 U.S.C. § 2024(b). While the

defendant may not have cited the statute at the sentencing hearing, he did ask the court

to consider a non-custodial sentence, and the court was aware of its authority to fashion

such a sentence. The government has filed a response to the letter and properly points

out that defendant is barred by his Rule 11 agreement accepted by the court. Clearly,

the court found that a custodial sentence is required in light of the sentencing factors

that apply.

Accordingly, defendant’s letter request is denied.

Dated: July 15, 2015

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2:14-cr-20724-GCS-RSW Doc # 13 Filed 07/15/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 68
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

July 15, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marcia Beauchemin

Deputy Clerk

2:14-cr-20724-GCS-RSW Doc # 13 Filed 07/15/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 69
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION of Chief Executive Officer of Penhall International Corp. I, John T. Sawyer, certify that:  (1)
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Penhall International Corp. (the Company)(2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;(3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;(4)
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e for the
Company and we have:  (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the
Companys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Companys
most recent fiscal that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the Companys internal control over financial
reporting; and  (5)
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the
Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the
Companys ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the Companys internal
controls over financial reporting. May 17, 2004 /s/ JOHN T. SAWYER John T. Sawyer
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          42,113
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,006,464
<ALLOWANCES>                                   423,939
<INVENTORY>                                     72,303
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,278,197
<PP&E>                                       1,540,419
<DEPRECIATION>                                 197,576
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,501,548
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,460,011
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,500,000
<COMMON>                                        10,852
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,004,105)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,501,548
<SALES>                                      4,708,151
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,708,151
<CGS>                                        4,666,064
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,666,064
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,252,872
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             3,034,645
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              97,373
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,345,222)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (20,748)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,324,474)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,324,474)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.59)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Election Assistance Commission

# AGENCY:

United States Election Assistance Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting for EAC Board of Advisors.

# DATE AND TIME:

Monday, January 22, 2007, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. and Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 8:30 a.m.-3 p.m.

# PLACE:

Four Points Sheraton, 1201 K Street, NW., (12th & K Streets, NW.), Washington, DC 20005, (202) 289-7600.

# PURPOSE:

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) Board of Advisors, as required by the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA), will meet and receive updates on EAC projects and activiteis and discuss other relevant matters pertaining to the administration of Federal elections. The Board will receive updates on the following subjects: EAC's voting system certification and laboratory accreditation program; activities of the Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC) regarding the voluntary voting system guidelines; HAVA financial reporting schedules; EAC's audit process; EAC's Election Duty survey and EAC's Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA) survey. The Board will also discuss other election administration and administrative matters.

This meeting will be open to the public.

# PERSON TO CONTACT OUR INFORMATION:

Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 566-3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,

Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-21 Filed 1-3-07; 4:23 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

______________________________________________________________________________

LINDA L. HAVNER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 14–cv-12895

v ) MAGISTRATE: R. STEVEN WHALEN 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, )

)

Defendant. ) ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF

) ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE 

) EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT

______________________________________________________________________________

This matter having come before the Court upon the parties’stipulation to attorneyfees under

the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), and the Court being fully advised in the premises;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted an award in the total amount

of $2,868.00, in full satisfaction and settlement of any and all claims Plaintiff may have under the

under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Any fees paid belong to Plaintiff

and not his attorney and can be offset to satisfy pre-existing debt that the litigant owes the United

States under Astrue v Ratliff, 2010 WL 2346547 (June 14, 2010).

After the Court enters this award, if counsel for the parties can verify that Plaintiff owes no

pre-existing debt subject to offset, the Defendant will direct that the award be made payable to

Plaintiff’s attorney pursuant to an EAJA assignment duly signed by Plaintiff and counsel.

s/R. Steven Whalen 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Date: November 5, 2015

4:14-cv-12895-RSW Doc # 25 Filed 11/05/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 593
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on

November 5, 2015, electronically and/or by U.S. mail.

s/C. Ciesla 

Case Manager 

2

4:14-cv-12895-RSW Doc # 25 Filed 11/05/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 594