alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 61 (Friday, March 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15137-15138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1567]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


The Health Department Subcommittee (HDS) of the Board of 
Scientific Counselors (BSC), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
(CDC), National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH)/Agency for Toxic 
Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR): Teleconference Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the CDC, NCEH/ATSDR announces the 
following teleconference meeting of the aforementioned subcommittee:
    Time and Date: 12:30 p.m.-2 p.m., April 23, 2007, Eastern Daylight 
Saving Time.
    Place: Century Center, 1825 Century Boulevard, Atlanta, Georgia 
30345.
    Status: Open to the public; teleconference access limited only by 
availability of telephone ports.
    Purpose: Under the charge of the BSC, NCEH/ATSDR, the HDS will 
provide the BSC, NCEH/ATSDR with advice and recommendations on local 
and State health department issues and concerns that pertain to the 
mandates and mission of NCEH/ATSDR.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include a review of the 
agenda; approval of minutes from the last conference call; a review 
``matrix'' for recommendations of workforce issues and science issues; 
a briefing on issues important to schools; pubic comment and the next 
steps for the HDS.
    Items are subject to change as priorities dictate.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: To participate in this teleconference 
meeting, please dial 877/315-6535 and enter conference code 383520. The 
public comment period is scheduled from 1:20 p.m.-1:30 p.m. Eastern 
Daylight Saving Time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shirley D. Little, Committee 
Management Specialist, NCEH/ATSDR, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, Mail Stop E-
28, Atlanta, GA 30303; telephone 404/498-0615; fax 404/498-0059; e-
mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1b6877726f6f777e5b787f78357c746d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0576696c71716960456661662b626a73">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for 
both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.


[[Page 15138]]


    Dated: March 23, 2007.
Elaine L. Baker,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 07-1567 Filed 3-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending October 29, 2005

|Filer               | Filing Type   | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                             
|------------------- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|BUTLER BANCORP, MHC | * 3A1* 3A3    | Application by Butler Bancorp, MHC and Butler Bancorp, Inc., both of Lowell, Massachusetts, to become a mutual bank holding company and a stock bank holding company, respectively, by acquiring Butler Bank, Lowell, Massachusetts, pursuant to section 3(a)(1) and section 3(a)(3) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. | Newspaper:Not availableFederal Register:10/14/2005
|Newspaper:          | Not available
|Federal Register:   | 10/14/2005   

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
From: Costello Insurance insure@aviationi.com

Subject: UAV Insurance and Edward Roberts

Date: May 27, 2015 at 3:55 PM

To: Hunter@iroberts.com

FM: COSTELLO INSURANCE 

TO: EDWARD ROBERTS

Dear Mr. Roberts,

Thank you for completing a request for UAV/Drone insurance information from our website. I am pleased to 

provide the following information for your consideration.

1. The aviation insurance companies I represent are not yet ready/willing to offer physical

damage (hull) coverage for UAVs or Drones. In short, no coverage on the aircraft. Just

liability coverage for the negligent operation of the insured aircraft.

2. Nor are they prepared to offer coverage for the camera. You may be able to get this

coverage via a floater policy to your homeowner’s or business insurance.

3. Currently, they are willing to offer liability coverage based on acceptable underwriting

information.

4. The aircraft must have a business or commercial use.

The most competitive quotes I’ve been seeing for this use are:

$500,000 combined single limit of bodily injury and property damage for $595 per year.

$1,000,000 combined single limit of bodily injury and property damage for $995 per year.

If the aircraft will be used for Business and/or Aerial Photography for Hire and either of the above indications 

interest you please advise and I’ll approach my insurance company for a solid quote.

Note: There is little point in approaching our insurance carriers for quotes until you are close to needing the 

coverage. When ready please return to our website, click on the Drone/UAV site, then click on the survey link 

in the center of the home page. Please complete the survey as we need to send it to our insurance carrier for

a quote.

Thank you for the opportunity to be of assistance! 

Best regards,

Pat

Pat Costello

480-968-7746

800-528-6483

480-967-3828 Fax 

insure@aviationi.com Office Email 

www.aviationi.com Website
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------


           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies
with  the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of  1934,  as  amended,  and  the  information  contained  in such report fairly
presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of
operations  of  the  Company.

This 25th day of March, 2003.



                                      /s/  Robert  G.  Peck
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Robert  G.  Peck
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer



                                      /s/  Harle  B.  Green
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Harle  B.  Green
                                      Chief  Financial  Officer


<PAGE>
# C_2013108EN.01002303.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 February 2013 — Laboratoire Bioderma v OHIM — Cabinet Continental (BIODERMA)

(Case T-427/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark BIODERMA - No infringement of the rights of the defence - Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009)

2013/C 108/62

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Laboratoire Bioderma (Lyon, France) (represented by: A. Teston, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Cabinet Continental (Paris, France) (represented by: J.-C. Brun, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 February 2011 (Case R 861/2009-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Cabinet Continental and Laboratoire Bioderma

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 28 February 2011 (Case R 861/2009-1) in so far as concerns dietetic substances adapted for medical use, in Class 5; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 28 February 2011 (Case R 861/2009-1) in so far as concerns dietetic substances adapted for medical use, in Class 5;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders Laboratoire Bioderma to bear its own costs and half of those incurred by OHIM and Cabinet Continental; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Laboratoire Bioderma to bear its own costs and half of those incurred by OHIM and Cabinet Continental;

| 4. | Orders OHIM and Cabinet Continental to bear half of their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders OHIM and Cabinet Continental to bear half of their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 298, 8.10.2011.

1

---
# C_2011331EN.01001303.xml

| 12.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/13

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 14 September 2011 — SIA ‘Cido Grupa’ v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

(Case C-471/11)

2011/C 331/24

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Referring court

Augstākās tiesas Senāts

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SIA ‘Cido Grupa’

Applicant:

Defendant: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the third subparagraph of Article 6(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 60/2004 (1) laying down transitional measures in the sugar sector by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia to be interpreted as meaning that, where an operator has been found to be in possession of an individual surplus of a product which may be classed as sugar within the meaning of Article 4, No 1, of the regulation, that operator is required to pay the State Treasury a sum which is calculated on the basis of the quantity of white sugar (Combined Nomenclature code 1701 99 10) corresponding to the sugar content of the product found in the operator’s possession, and not on the basis of the quantity of the actual product found in its possession (for example, sugar syrup)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the third subparagraph of Article 6(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 60/2004 (1) laying down transitional measures in the sugar sector by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia to be interpreted as meaning that, where an operator has been found to be in possession of an individual surplus of a product which may be classed as sugar within the meaning of Article 4, No 1, of the regulation, that operator is required to pay the State Treasury a sum which is calculated on the basis of the quantity of white sugar (Combined Nomenclature code 1701 99 10) corresponding to the sugar content of the product found in the operator’s possession, and not on the basis of the quantity of the actual product found in its possession (for example, sugar syrup)?

1

| 2. | In the calculation of that payment, are the highest import duty rates applicable to white sugar to be applied instead of those applicable to the actual product found in the operator’s possession? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In the calculation of that payment, are the highest import duty rates applicable to white sugar to be applied instead of those applicable to the actual product found in the operator’s possession?

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 9, p. 8.

1

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6346** 

ALTON EDWIN HILTON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. TRACY JOHNS, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis trict of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:09

- hc

- 02029

- D )

Submitted : October 19, 2010 Decided: October 26, 2010

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.

Al ton Edwin Hilton, Appellant Pro Se
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Alton Edwin Hilton , a federal prisoner, appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010 ) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hilton v. Johns , No. 5:09

- hc

- 02029

- D (E.D.N.C. March 1, 2010) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts a nd legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 66 (Friday, April 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 17159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1739]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice; Announcing a Partially Open Meeting 
of the Board of Directors

Time and Date: The open meeting of the Board of Directors is scheduled 
to begin at 10 a.m. on Wednesday, April 11, 2007. The closed portion of 
the meeting will follow immediately the open portion of the meeting.

Place: Board Room, First Floor, Federal Housing Finance Board, 1625 Eye 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006.

Status: The first portion of the meeting will be open to the public. 
The final portion of the meeting will be closed to the public.

Matters to be Considered at the Open Portion: Appointment to the Office 
of Finance Board of Directors.
    Waivers Concerning Preparation of Combined Financial Reports.

Matter to be Considered at the Closed Portion: Periodic Update of 
Examination Program Development and Supervisory Findings.

Contact Person for More Information: Shelia Willis, Paralegal 
Specialist, Office of General Counsel, at 202-408-2876 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f087999c9c998383b096989692de979f86"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6c1b050000051f1f2c0a040a0e420b031a">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: April 3, 2007.

    By the Federal Housing Finance Board.
Neil R. Crowley,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 07-1739 Filed 4-4-07; 12:53 pm]
BILLING CODE 6725-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 185.610 Watertight doors and watertight hatches.

Watertight doors and watertight hatches must be marked on both sides in clearly legible letters at least 25 millimeters (1 inch) high: “WATERTIGHT DOOR—KEEP CLOSED” or “WATERTIGHT HATCH—KEEP CLOSED”, unless such markings are deemed unnecessary by the cognizant OCMI.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 4 (Monday, January 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-21]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting for EAC Board of Advisors.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME: Monday, January 22, 2007, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. and Tuesday, 
January 23, 2007, 8:30 a.m.-3 p.m.

PLACE: Four Points Sheraton, 1201 K Street, NW., (12th & K Streets, 
NW.), Washington, DC 20005, (202) 289-7600.

PURPOSE: The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) Board of 
Advisors, as required by the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA), will 
meet and receive updates on EAC projects and activiteis and discuss 
other relevant matters pertaining to the administration of Federal 
elections. The Board will receive updates on the following subjects: 
EAC's voting system certification and laboratory accreditation program; 
activities of the Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC) 
regarding the voluntary voting system guidelines; HAVA financial 
reporting schedules; EAC's audit process; EAC's Election Duty survey 
and EAC's Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA) 
survey. The Board will also discuss other election administration and 
administrative matters.
    This meeting will be open to the public.

PERSON TO CONTACT OUR INFORMATION: Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 
566-3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-21 Filed 1-3-07; 4:23 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1967 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1967

   To prohibit funding organizations that support or participate in 
            coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 2009

Mr. Sensenbrenner (for himself and Mr. Smith of New Jersey) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit funding organizations that support or participate in 
            coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING ORGANIZATIONS THAT SUPPORT OR 
              PARTICIPATE IN COERCIVE ABORTION OR INVOLUNTARY 
              STERILIZATION.

    (a) Prohibition.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Secretary of State may not make a contribution, whether voluntary or 
assessed, to any organization or program that supports or participates 
in the management of a program of coercive abortion or involuntary 
sterilization.
    (b) Definition.--In this section, the term ``supports or 
participates in'' includes providing material, financial, or technical 
support to any government, agency, or nongovernmental organization that 
enforces or implements a program that includes coercive abortion or 
involuntary sterilization (or any government agency or nongovernmental 
organization that controls, is controlled by, or is under common 
control of such government or agency).
                                 <all>
```
# C_2012013EN.01001502.xml

| 14.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/15

---

Action brought on 30 September 2011 — Genebre v OHIM — General Electric (GE)

(Case T-520/11)

2012/C 13/32

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Genebre, SA (Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain) (represented by: D. Pellisé Urquiza, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: General Electric Company (Schenectady, United States of America)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare the application admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the application admissible;

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 July 2011 in Case R 20/2009-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 July 2011 in Case R 20/2009-4;

| — | Order that Community trade mark No 5 006 325 be granted in respect of all the goods and services for which registration was sought. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order that Community trade mark No 5 006 325 be granted in respect of all the goods and services for which registration was sought.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘GE’ for goods in Classes 6, 7, 9, 11 and 17.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: General Electric Company.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National and Community word marks ‘GE’ and Community figurative mark ‘GE’ for goods and services in Classes 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 25, 28, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43 and 44.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal upheld.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Plea in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009, since there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue and General Electric Company has not produced sufficient evidence to show that its marks had been put to genuine use.

Plea in law:

---