alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.3





Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer



I, Robert M. Little, Jr., certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Highlands Bankshares, Inc.

2.   Based on my  knowledge,  this  report  does not  contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this report;

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present in all  material respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,  including its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by  others  within  those entities,  particularly  during the period in which this   report is being prepared;

(b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)  disclosed  in  this   report  any  change  in the  registrant's internal  control  over  financial reporting  that  occurred  during  the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,  the registrant's  internal control  over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,  based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  all significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to record,  process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)  any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over financial reporting.





Date: March 31, 2006



/s/ Robert M. Little, Jr.

----------------------------------------------------

Robert M. Little, Jr.

Chief Financial Officer
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

V.

V.C.M.

DOB: 2/22/03,

Appellant,

Respondent.

No. 75743-1-1

DIVISION ONE

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

FILED: DEC 1 8 2017

cr.

PER CURIAM. The State appeals an order sealing V.C.M.'s records

following his completion of a deferred disposition and the dismissal of his

conviction for possession of marijuana. The State contends, and V.C.M.'s

counsel on appeal agrees, that "[t]he trial court violated RCW 13.40.127 and

RCW 13.50.260 by sealing the Respondent's juvenile criminal case file upon

successful completion of a deferred disposition before the Respondent's

eighteenth birthday." Appellant's brief at 1. The State's contention and V.C.M.'s

concession are controlled by our recent decision in State v. H.Z.-B., Wn. App.

, P.3d (2017) (holding that statutes pertaining to record sealing and

deferred dispositions indicate that juvenile record should be sealed when case is

dismissed and do not prohibit sealing until juvenile's eighteenth birthday). In light

of H.Z.B., it is unnecessary to reach V.C.M.'s contention that trial counsel was

ineffective for failing to argue an alternative basis for sealing the record.

Affirmed.

For the Court:

)3: ,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

JULIE M. DONAHUE,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

MEDICAL FINANCIAL 

SOLUTIONS 

Defendant.

Case No. 15−cv−11299 

Hon. Linda V. Parker 

 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

NOW COMES the Parties, Julie M. Donahue (“Plaintiff”), and Medical 

Financial Solutions (“Defendant”) presenting this stipulation of dismissal, as follows: 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, having reached a settlement in this 

matter, the Parties respectfully request that this Honorable Court enter an Order 

dismissing the case with prejudice. 

Dated: September 23, 2015

SO STIPULATED:

With consent: 

By: /s/A. Stephen Ramadan By: /s/ Dana Perminas 

A. Stephen Ramadan (P41892) Dana Perminas (IL # 6298057) 

Attorney for Plaintiffs 166 W. Washington, Suite 300 

22201 Harper Ave., Ste. 102 Chicago, IL 60602 

St. Clair Shores, MI 48080 Messer, Stilp & Strickler, Ltd. 

(586) 441-3239 (312) 334-3476 

steveramadan@gmail.com Perminas@messerstilp.com 

 Attorney for Defendant 

4:15-cv-11299-LVP-EAS Doc # 19 Filed 09/23/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 33
 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

 

JULIE M. DONAHUE, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. Case No. 15−cv−11299

 Hon. Linda V. Parker 

MEDICAL FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, 

 Defendant. 

 _______________________________________________/ 

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

IT IS ORDERED that this matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

 s/ Linda V. Parker 

 LINDA V. PARKER 

 U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: September 23, 2015 

4:15-cv-11299-LVP-EAS Doc # 19 Filed 09/23/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 34
[CAGAN-MCAFEE LETTERHEAD]

Exhibit 10.3

September 23,
2003

Mr. Robert
S. Herlin
Chief Executive Officer NATURAL GAS SYSTEMS, INC.3 Raydon Lane
Houston, TX 77024

Dear
Bob,

We
are pleased that Natural Gas Systems, Inc. (the "Company") desires to engage Cagan McAfee Capital Partners, LLC
("CMCP") as its financial advisor with respect to various matters involving the business of the Company (the "Advisory
Services").We look forward to working with you and your management team, and have set forth below the agreed upon terms of our involvement.





1

---











2

---







We
are pleased to accept this engagement and look forward to working with you on this matter. Please confirm that the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding of our agreement by signing and
returning to us a copy of this letter.

| |  | Very truly yours,                 
| |  | ----------------------------------
| |  | CAGAN MCAFEE CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC
| |  | By:                               

3

---



Accepted
and agreed to as of the date set forth above:

NATURAL GAS SYSTEMS, INC.

|By |  | Robert S. Herlin
Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------- |  | 

4

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1893]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel Design, Synthesis and Preclinical Testing of 
Potential Treatment Agents for Drug Addiction.
    Date: May 8, 2007.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Jury's Washington Hotel, 1500 New Hampshire Avenue, 
Washington, DC 20036.
    Contact Person: Mark Swieter, PhD, Chief, Training and Special 
Projects Review Branch, Office of Extramural Affairs, National 
Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Suite 
220, Bethesda, MD 20892-8401, (301) 435-1389, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6d001e555d152d030405430a021b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="670a145f571f27090e0f49000811">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Initial 
Review Group Health Services Research Subcommittee.
    Date: June 5-6, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Fairmont Washington, DC, 2401 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20037.
    Contact Person: Meenaxi Hiremath, PhD, Health Scientist 
Administrator, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on 
Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, 6101 Executive 
Blvd., Suite 220, MSC 8401, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7964, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fc9194cfc5ce9bbc929594d29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="92fffaa1aba0f5d2fcfbfabcf5fde4">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS).

    Dated: April 10, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1893 Filed 4-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Order of the General Court of 13 July 2011 – N’Guessan v Council**

**(Case T-352/11)**

Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire – Action for annulment – Time-limit for bringing an action – Out of time – Clear inadmissibility

1.                     *Actions for annulment – Time-limits – Matter of public policy – Examination by the EU judicature of its own motion (Art. 263,
sixth para., TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 102(1) and (2)) (see paras 11-12)*

2.                     *Actions for annulment – Time-limits – Starting point – Publication date of the measure in question (Arts 263, fourth and sixth
paras, TFEU and 275, second para., TFEU; Council Regulation No 560/2005; Council Decision 2010/656) (see para. 16)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for annulment, first, of Council Decision 2011/221/CFSP of 6 April 2011 amending Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 93, p. 20), and, secondly, of Council Regulation (EU) No 330/2011 of 6 April 2011 amending Regulation No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 93, p. 10), in so far as they concern the applicant. |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The action is dismissed. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Mr Affi Pascal N’Guessan is ordered to bear his own costs. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for accelerated procedure and priority judgment. |
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of and for the period covered by theReport. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  May      14, 2010 | /s/ Price W. Schwenck           |
|------------------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                               | Price      W. Schwenck          |
|                               | Chief      Executive Officer    |
|                               |                            |
| Date:  May      14, 2010 | /s/ Valerie A. Kendall          |
|                               | Valerie      A. Kendall         |
|                               | Executive      Vice President   |
|                               | and      Chief FinancialOfficer |

----
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-930 

________________________________________________________________________ 

NUCLEAR SAFETY 

 Memorandum of Understanding 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and AUSTRALIA 

Signed at Vienna September 30, 2008 

with 

Addenda 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
AUSTRALIA 

Nuclear Safety 

 Memorandum of understanding signed 

 at Vienna September 30, 2008; 

 Entered into force September 30, 2008. 

 With addenda.
#### Charles A. Danolds, *Respondent, v.*The People of the State of New York, *Appellant*.

Award of State Board of Audit affirmed, with costs and disbursements of this appeal to the respondent^ Opinion by

Mullin, P. J.
#### HILLSIDE BUS OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION ET AL. v. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS ET AL.

Submitted October term, 1928

Decided January 3, 1929.

Before Justices Mintürn, Black and Campbell.

'For the rule, *Nicholas 8. Schloeder.*

Contra, *William R. Speer*and *John W. Queen.*

Per Curiam.

We find that the writ applied for should not be allowed. 'The rule to show cause is therefore discharged.
Case 2:15-cv-11074-DML-DRG ECF No. 16 filed 03/30/18 PageID.986 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:15-cv-11074-DML-DRG ECF No. 16 filed 03/30/18 PageID.987 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:15-cv-11074-DML-DRG ECF No. 16 filed 03/30/18 PageID.988 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:15-cv-11074-DML-DRG ECF No. 16 filed 03/30/18 PageID.989 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:15-cv-11074-DML-DRG ECF No. 16 filed 03/30/18 PageID.990 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:15-cv-11074-DML-DRG ECF No. 16 filed 03/30/18 PageID.991 Page 6 of 6
§ 171.122 Watertight integrity above the margin line in a vessel of 100 gross tons or more. ( a ) For the purpose of this section, a partial watertight bulkhead is one in which all portions are not watertight.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, the bulkhead deck or a deck above it must be weathertight.
( c ) Partial watertight bulkheads or web frames must be located in the immediate vicinity of main transverse watertight bulkheads to minimize as much as practicable the entry and spread of water above the bulkhead deck.
( d ) If a partial watertight bulkhead or web frame is located on the bulkhead deck in order to comply with paragraph (c) of this section, the joint between it and the shell and bulkhead deck must be watertight.
( e ) If a partial watertight bulkhead does not line up with a main transverse watertight bulkhead below the bulkhead deck, the bulkhead deck between them must be watertight.
( f ) Each opening in an exposed weather deck must— ( 1 ) Have a coaming that complies with the height requirements in table 171.124(d); and
( 2 ) Have a means for closing it weathertight.
( g ) Each port light located between the bulkhead deck and the next deck above the bulkhead deck must have an inside dead cover than can be secured watertight.
[CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51017, Nov. 4, 1983, as amended by CGD 85-080, 61 FR 945, Jan. 10, 1996; 62 FR 51354, Sept. 30, 1997]
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. JOHN MOHR, Respondent, *v.*THE BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS, Appellant.

*Police commissioners*— power *of; to try, and remove members of the force*— the *testimony must be taken before at least one of the commissioners who unite in the removal.*

Appeal from an order of the Special Term, reversing the action ■of the commissioners, and reinstating the relator.

Charges were made against the respondent of conduct unbecoming .-an officer, and they were investigated on December 31,1879, before Charles F. MacLean, then one of the police commissioners of the city of New York. The board of police commissioners, however, did not act on the charges and the proceedings consequent upon them until April of the following year, when, at a meeting of the commissioners, the board, then consisting of Messrs. French, Wheeler, Yoorhis and Nichols, Mr. MacLean being no longer a ■commissioner, the relator was removed.

On his application made at the Special Term, this determination ■of the board was annulled, and he was reinstated. From the order ■declaring such resfilt this appeal is taken.

The court at General Term said: “We have held that the ¡examination may be conducted in these matters before one commis*463sioner, and submitted by him to the others; but we have not declared in any case that the testimony may be taken before a commissioner and a removal had after he shall have Ceased to be a member of the board, and therefore by commissioners none of whom participated in the investigation or trial. We went far enough when it was declared that one commissioner might take the testimony. We think it would be a violation of the statute conferring the power of investigation or trial and removal, to hold that it could be done by commissioners, neither of whom actually participated in the investigation, and neither of whom knew anything about it or its incidents, except what could be derived from the minutes of the proceedings which took place before a person who, at the time of their action, had ceased to be one of their body. It is essential that at least one of the commissioners acting upon the charges shall be present during the investigation of them, so that a part of the tribunal shall have participated in the trial.”

*Frank A.*Irish, for the appellant.

*Douglas A. levien, Jr.,*for the respondent.

Opinion by

Brady, P. J.;

Daniels and Barker, JJ., concurred.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
DCD_ECFNotice@dcd.uscour

ts.gov

07/03/2008 03:03 PM

To DCD_ECFNotice@dcd.uscourts.gov

cc

bcc

Subject Activity in Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR SPEECHNOW.ORG et al 

v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Amended Complaint

This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT 

RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.

***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States 

policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to 

receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required 

by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later 

charges, download a copy each document during this first viewing. However, if the 

referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply.

U.S. District Court

District of Columbia

Notice of Electronic Filing

The following transaction was entered on 7/3/2008 at 3:01 PM and filed on 7/2/2008 

Case Name: SPEECHNOW.ORG et al v. FEDERAL ELECTION 

COMMISSION

Case Number: 1:08-cv-248

Filer: SPEECHNOW.ORG

DAVID KEATING

FRED M. YOUNG, JR

EDWARD H. CRANE, III

BRAD RUSSO

SCOTT BURKHARDT

Document 

Number: 33(No document attached) 

Docket Text:

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION filed 

by SPEECHNOW.ORG, DAVID KEATING, FRED M. YOUNG, JR, EDWARD H. 

CRANE, III, BRAD RUSSO, SCOTT BURKHARDT.(nmw, ) 

1:08-cv-248 Notice has been electronically mailed to: 

J. Gerald Hebert JGHEBERT@COMCAST.NET, ghebert@campaignlegalcenter.org
Steve Nicholas Hajjar shajjar@fec.gov, dkolker@fec.gov, sgarr@fec.gov

Robert William Bonham, III rbonham@fec.gov, dkolker@fec.gov, dnutwell@fec.gov, 

hsummers@fec.gov, kdeeley@fec.gov, litigation@fec.gov, sgarr@fec.gov, vgraham@fec.gov

David Brett Kolker dkolker@fec.gov, sgarr@fec.gov, vgraham@fec.gov

Kevin Deeley kdeeley@fec.gov, dkolker@fec.gov, sgarr@fec.gov, vgraham@fec.gov

Steven Simpson ssimpson@ij.org, BSmith@law.capital.edu, bgall@ij.org, 

mdarner@campaignfreedom.org, paralegal@ij.org, psherman@ij.org, rfrese@ij.org, 

shoersting@campaignfreedom.org

Michael P. Darner (Terminated) mdarner@campaignfreedom.org

1:08-cv-248 Notice will be delivered by other means to:: 

Stephen M. Hoersting 

CENTER FOR COMPETITIVE POLITICS

124 S. West Street

Suite 201

Alexandria, VA 22314

Bradley A. Smith 

CENTER FOR COMPETITIVE POLITICS

124 S. West Street

Suite 201

Alexandria, VA 22314
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.115-21 Operation and maintenance instructions. ( a ) Each winch must have operation and maintenance instructions that— ( 1 ) Follows the general format and content specified in IMO MSC.1 Circ. 1205 (incorporated by reference, see § 160.115-5 of this subpart); and
( 2 ) Includes a checklist for use in monthly, external visual inspections of the winch.
( b ) The winch manufacturer must make the manual required by paragraph (a) of this section available in English to the purchaser of a winch approved by the Coast Guard.
( c ) The operation and maintenance instructions required by paragraph (a) of this section may be combined with similar material for survival craft and rescue boats, and their complete launching systems.
#### § 166.10 Course of study for engineering students.

The course of study for engineering students shall include (a) all the instruction necessary to fully equip the student with the theoretical knowledge required for the proper discharge of the duties developing upon qualified members of the engine department; (b) a thorough practical training in the mechanics of all operations incident to the sailing and management of a vessel insofar as such operations form a part of the duties of qualified members of the engine department.
§ 24.15-1 Conditions under which equivalents may be used. ( a ) Where in this subchapter it is provided that a particular fitting, material, appliance, apparatus, or equipment, or type thereof, shall be fitted or carried in a vessel, or that any particular provision shall be made or arrangement shall be adopted, the Commandant may accept in substitution therefor any other fitting, material, apparatus, or equipment, or type thereof, or any other arrangement: *Provided,* That he shall have been satisfied by suitable trials that the fitting, material, appliance, apparatus, or equipment, or type thereof, or the provision or arrangement is at least as effective as that specified in this subchapter.
( b ) In any case where it is shown to the satisfaction of the Commandant that the use of any particular equipment, apparatus, or arrangement not specifically required by law is unreasonable or impracticable, the Commandant may permit the use of alternate equipment, apparatus, or arrangement to such an extent and upon such conditions as will insure to his satisfaction, a degree of safety consistent with the minimum standards set forth in this subchapter.