alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012194EN.01002001.xml

| 30.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 May 2012 — Nijs v Court of Auditors

(Case T-184/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Disciplinary measures - Disciplinary procedure - Removal from post with entitlement to old-age pension - Articles 22a and 22b of the Staff Regulations - Requirement for precision in the appeal - New plea in law - Effective judicial protection - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - No obligation on the court to raise of its own motion a plea alleging infringement of the principle that action must be taken within a reasonable period)

2012/C 194/32

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Bart Nijs (Bereldange, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Rollinger and P.-F. Onimus, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Court of Auditors of the European Union (represented by: T. Kennedy, J. Vermer and K. Zavřelová, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 13 January 2011 in Case F-77/09 Nijs v Court of Auditors, not published in the ECR, seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Nijs

Court of Auditors

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mr Bart Nijs to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Court of Auditors of the European Union in the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Bart Nijs to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Court of Auditors of the European Union in the appeal proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 18.6.2011.

1

---
SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN DIGITAS AND DAVID KENNY



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
  
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT dated as of January 21, 2005 between Digitas Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), and David W. Kenny (the “Executive”). 
  
 WHEREAS,
the Executive is currently employed as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, under an Employment Agreement dated January 6, 1999, as amended on February 1, 2000 (collectively, the “Agreement”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has authorized certain severance provisions in
respect of senior executives of the Company, and the parties hereto consider it appropriate that the Agreement be amended to reflect such provisions; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Executive agree to the following amendment to the Agreement. Defined terms used in this Amendment shall have the same meanings as in
the Agreement. 
  
 1. Section 4(d)(i) of the Agreement is deleted and replaced
with the following: 
  
 “(i)     For a
period of twenty-four months after the Date of Termination, the Company shall continue to pay the Executive (A) the Base Salary at the rate in effect immediately before the Date of Termination (but, in the case of a termination by the Executive for
Good Reason, disregarding any reduction thereof that was the basis for such termination) and (B) a bonus amount (the “Bonus Amount”) equal to two times (2x) the average of the annual bonuses paid to the Executive for the three years
immediately preceding the year of the Date of Termination. If no bonus was paid to the Executive for the year immediately preceding the year of the Date of Termination, the Bonus Amount shall be calculated at fifty percent (50%) of the Base Salary
multiplied by two (2x); 
  
 2. Section 4(d) of the Agreement is amended to include
the following section following subsection (v): 
  
 “(vi)     Restricted stock previously granted to the Executive shall become vested immediately.” 
  
  
 [REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and Company have executed this Amendment as of the date
set forth above. 
  
 EXECUTIVE 
  
  
 /s/    David W. Kenny 

	 	


 David W. Kenny 
  
  
 DIGITAS INC. 
  
  
 /s/    Anne Drapeau 

	 	


 Anne Drapeau, Chief People Officer
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.144-2 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this subpart with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material is available for inspection at the U.S. Coast Guard, Office of Design and Engineering Standards (CG-ENG), 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, and is available from the sources listed below. It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html*.
( b ) International Maritime Organization (IMO) Publishing, 4 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR, United Kingdom, +44 (0)20 7735 7611, *http://www.imo.org*. ( 1 ) 2010 FTP Code, International Code for Application of Fire Test Procedures, 2010 (Resolution MSC.307(88)), 2012 Edition (“FTP Code”), IBR approved for § 164.144-3(a).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
Order entered December 10, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 01282 - CV IN RE HILLVIEW VILLA GE, LP AND FIRESIDE CUSTOM HOMES, LLC, Relators

O rigina l Proceeding from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429 - 04442 - 2018



### O RDER Before Justices Lang

- Miers, Fillmore, and Stoddart Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.

/s/ CRA IG STODDART JUSTICE
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.940 Standards for marking of cargo hose. No person may mark a hose assembly as meeting the standards of this section unless the hose assembly meets the following requirements: ( a ) Each hose assembly must have: ( 1 ) Fully threaded connections;
( 2 ) Flanges that meet ANSI B16.5, B16.24, or B16.31; or
( 3 ) Class 1 quick-disconnect couplings that comply with ASTM F 1122 (incorporated by reference, see § 153.4), and are marked “C1-1.”
( b ) Each hose assembly must be marked with the: ( 1 ) Date of manufacture;
( 2 ) Working pressure described in paragraph (d) of this section;
( 3 ) Date of the last test made as prescribed in paragraph (e) of this section; and
( 4 ) Manufacturer's recommended maximum and minimum temperatures.
( c ) A cargo hose assembly must have a minimum bursting pressure as stated by the manufacturer of at least 5152 kPa gauge (approx. 750 psig).
( d ) The working pressure marked on a hose must meet the following: ( 1 ) Be at least 1030 kPa gauge (approx. 150 psig).
( 2 ) Not exceeded 20 per cent (one-fifth) of the manufacturer's stated bursting pressure.
( 3 ) Not exceed the manufacturer's recommended working pressure.
( 4 ) Not exceed the test pressure used in the latest test under paragraph (e)(3) of this section.
( e ) A cargo hose assembly must be inspected and tested by placing it in a straight, horizontal position so that its entire external surface is accessible. It must be ascertained that the hose assembly: ( 1 ) Has no loose covers, kinks, bulges, soft spots, and no gouges, cuts, or slashes that penetrate any hose reinforcement;
( 2 ) Has no external and, to the extent internal inspection is possible with both ends of the hose open, no internal deterioration; and
( 3 ) Does not burst, bulge, leak, or abnormally distort under static liquid pressure at least as great as the recommended working pressure.
[CGD 73-96, 42 FR 49027, Sept. 26, 1977, as amended by CGD 78-128, 47 FR 21211, May 17, 1982; CGD 88-032, 56 FR 35827, July 29, 1991; USCG-2000-7790, 65 FR 58463, Sept. 29, 2000; USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58284, Sept. 29, 2014]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the audited
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1998 and the
audited statement of
income for the twelve months then ended contained in the report
on Form 10-K for
the twelve months ended December 31, 1998, of Batteries
Batteries, Inc. and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             330
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,714
<ALLOWANCES>                                       563
<INVENTORY>                                      9,452
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,484
<PP&E>                                           1,336
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,951
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,669
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,669
<SALES>                                         51,454
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,454
<CGS>                                           35,419
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,419
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,684
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 790
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,441)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (379)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,061)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 176.306 Stability letter.

When, in accordance with § 178.210 of this chapter, a vessel must be provided with a stability letter, the stability letter must be posted under glass or other suitable transparent material, such that all pages are visible, at the operating station of the vessel. If posting is impracticable, the stability letter must be kept on board in a weathertight container readily available for use by the crew and display to passengers and others on request.

[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 953, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51049, Sept. 30, 1997]
§ 172.047 Specific applicability. This section applies to each tank barge that carries, in independent tanks described in § 151.15-1(b) of this chapter, a cargo listed in Table 30.25-1 of this chapter that is a— ( a ) Liquefied flammable gas; or
( b ) Flammable liquid that has a Reid vapor pressure in excess of 25 pounds per square inch (172.4 KPa).
# C_2012032EN.01001501.xml

| 4.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/15

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 25 November 2011 — Christoph Becker v Société Air France SA

(Case C-594/11)

2012/C 32/27

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Amtsgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Christoph Becker

Applicant:

Defendant: Société Air France SA

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is a passenger entitled to compensation under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) if the departure time of a flight has been delayed for a period of time falling within the limits defined in Article 6(1) of the regulation, but the flight arrives at the final destination at least three hours after the scheduled time of arrival?

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      12,423,300                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    112,700                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,691,700                       0
<PP&E>                                       5,966,000                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,040,000)                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,635,500                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,304,000                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,600                       0
<COMMON>                                        70,800                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,790,300                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,635,500                       0
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,660,500               4,113,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             782,800                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,373,400)             (3,997,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,373,400)             (3,997,500)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,376,200)             (3,997,500)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.02)                  (0.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.02)                  (0.96)


</TABLE>
# C_2011340EN.01004202.xml

| 19.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/42

---

Action brought on 29 August 2011 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-85/11)

2011/C 340/88

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, A.Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the Commission’s decision not to promote the applicant to Grade AST 5 from 1 March 2009 in the 2009 promotion exercise

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment of the Commission’s decision not to promote the applicant to Grade AST 5 from 1 March 2009 in the 2009 promotion exercise; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the Commission’s decision not to promote the applicant to Grade AST 5 from 1 March 2009 in the 2009 promotion exercise;

| — | Order the Commission do pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission do pay the costs.

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 153

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 153.565 Special requirement for temperature sensors.

If a cargo listed in table 1 of this part refers to this section, temperature sensors must be used to monitor the cargo pump temperature to detect overheating due to pump failures, when carrying that cargo.

[CGD 94-900, 59 FR 45139, Aug. 31, 1994]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of TorreyPines Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Evelyn A. Graham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Evelyn A. GrahamEvelyn A. GrahamChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


August 11, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 70 (Thursday, April 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 18509]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1805]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Ninth Meeting, RTCA Special Committee 204: 406 MHz Emergency 
Locator Transmitters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 204 meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 204: 406 MHz Emergency Locator 
Transmitters.

DATES: The meeting will be held on May 16-17, 2007, from 8:30 a.m. to 
4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., Colson Board Room, 
1828 L Street, NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC, 20036-5133.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC, 20036-5133; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax 
(202) 833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 202 meeting. The agenda will 
include:
    <bullet> May 16-17:
    <bullet> Opening Session (Welcome, Introductory and Administrative 
Remarks, Agenda Overview).
    <bullet> Approval of Summary for the Eighth meeting held on 16-17 
January 2007, RTCA Paper No. 029-07/SC 204-021.
    <bullet> EUROCAE ELT Status.
    <bullet> Committee Presentations, Discussion, Recommendations.
    <bullet> Revisions/Updates to DO-204--Minimum Operational 
Performance Standards for 406 MHz Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELT).
    <bullet> Any New Items Discussions.
    <bullet> Open Actions Items.
    <bullet> Closing Session (Other Business, Assignment/Review of 
Future Work, Establish Agenda, Date and Place of Next Meeting, Closing 
Remarks, Adjourn).
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 3, 2007.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 07-1805 Filed 4-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
§ 172.160 Definitions. As used in this subpart— ( a ) Length or L means the load line length (LLL).
( b ) *MARVS* means the Maximum Allowable Relief Valve Setting of a cargo tank.
**IN THE SUPREME COUR T**  **OF THE STATE OF MONTANA** No. DA 22

- 0667 MONTANA DEMOCRATIC PARTY and MITCH BOHN, WESTERN NATIVE VOICE, et al., MONTANA YOUTH ACTION, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellees,
v. CHRISTI JACOBSEN, in her official capacity as Montana Secretary of State, Defendant and Appellant. **ORDER GRANTING SCHOLARS OF STATE CONSTITUTIONAL**

**LAW LEAVE TO APPEAR AS**  **AMICI CURIAE** Pursuant to the Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Amici Curiae Brief filed by Professors Miria m Seifter and Robert Yablo n of the State Democracy Research Initiative at the University of Wisconsin Law School, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The Amicus B rief filed by the proposed A mici on July 7, 2023, shall be lodged by the Clerk o f the Supreme Court and served by Amici on all parties
.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 12 2023

07/12/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0667