alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.009-1 General. ( a ) This subpart contains— ( 1 ) Procedures for approval of noncombustible materials used in merchant vessel construction;
( 2 ) The test and measurements required for approval of materials; and
( 3 ) A list of noncombustible materials for which specific approval under this subpart is not required.
( b ) The test and measurements described in this subpart are conducted by a laboratory designated by the Commandant. The following laboratories are so designated:
Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., 333 Pfingsten Road, Northbrook, IL 60062 Dantest, National Institute for Testing and Verification, Amager Boulevard 115, DK 2300 Copenhagen S., Denmark [CGD 74-129, 41 FR 41701, Sept. 23, 1976, as amended by CGD 86-035, 54 FR 36316, Sept. 1, 1989]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief
Financial Officer of Thinkpath Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that to the
best of my knowledge:

           (a)       The Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
                     period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report"), to which
                     this certification is attached as an exhibit, fully
                     complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (b)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                     all material respects, the financial condition and results
                     of operations of the Company.



/s/  Kelly Hankinson
-----------------------
Kelly Hankinson
Chief Financial Officer



November 19, 2002
-----------------------
#### § 176.704 Breaking of safety valve seals.

The owner, managing operator, or master shall notify the cognizant OCMI as soon as practicable after the seal on a boiler safety valve on a vessel is broken.
###### Editorial Note on Part 164

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 164.018-13 Production inspections.

The Coast Guard does not inspect retroreflective material approved under this subpart on a regular schedule. However, the Commandant may select samples and conduct tests and examinations whenever necessary to determine whether retroreflective material is being manufactured in compliance with the requirements of this subpart.
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Central Federal Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 16, 2010
    /s/ Therese Ann LiutkusTherese Ann Liutkus, CPAPresident, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
§ 183.530 Hazardous areas. ( a ) Electrical equipment in spaces containing machinery powered by, or fuel tanks for, gasoline or other fuels having a flashpoint of 43.3 °C (110 °F) or lower must be explosion-proof or ignition-protected, or be part of an intrinsically safe system.
( b ) Electrical equipment in lockers used to store paint, oil, turpentine, or other flammable liquids must be explosion-proof or be part of an intrinsically safe system.
( c ) Explosion-proof equipment and intrinsically safe systems must meet the requirements of § 111.105 in subchapter J of this chapter.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 997, Jan. 10, 1996; 61 FR 24465, May 15, 1996]
#### § 167.40-40 Radar.

All mechanically propelled vessels of 1,600 gross tons and over in ocean or coastwise service must be fitted with a marine radar system for surface navigation. Facilities for plotting radar readings must be provided on the bridge.

[CGFR 75-074, 42 FR 5964, Jan. 31, 1977]
# C_2011319EN.01001002.xml

| 29.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/10

---

Action brought on 1 September 2011 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-450/11)

2011/C 319/18

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Afonso and L. Lozano Palacios, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by applying the special VAT scheme for travel agents to travel services sold to persons other than travellers, as provided for by Decree-Law No 221/85 of 3 July 1985, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 306 to 310 of the VAT Directive. (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by applying the special VAT scheme for travel agents to travel services sold to persons other than travellers, as provided for by Decree-Law No 221/85 of 3 July 1985, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 306 to 310 of the VAT Directive. (1)

1

| — | Order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission considers that, in so far as the Portuguese Republic applies the special scheme in question to the services supplied by travel agents to other travel agents or to other persons liable to VAT other than travellers, its application of that scheme is not consistent with the provisions of the European Union legislation in that field, since in accordance with the VAT Directive the special scheme must be applied only to services supplied to travellers.

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

1

---
----

See Figure 7 for view orientation.  Note that there are no visible dredged material deposits.  Scale across bottom of image is about 14.5 km. VE = 3x.

----

----

----

SusanA. Cochran

U.S. Department of the Interior,U.S.Geological Survey,Western RegionCoastal and Marine Geology
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

EDUARDO PEREZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-2038

[March 16, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Daliah H. Weiss, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2019-CF008460-AXXX-WB.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant 

Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, 

West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **3 -**  **2153**

MICHAEL GODBEY , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. IREDELL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INCORPORATED , Defendant

- Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Wes tern District of North Carolina , a t Statesville
. Richard L. Voorhees, D istrict Judge. ( 5:12

- cv - 00004

- RLV

- DSC )

Submitted : May 23 , 2014 Decided: July 25, 2014

Before MOTZ and THACKER , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by u n published per curiam opinion
.
Robert M. Elliot, ELLIOT MORGAN PARSONAGE, PLLC, Winston

- Salem, North Carolina; Mary C. Vargas, Michael S. Stein, STEIN & VARGAS, LLP, Frederick, Maryland; Marc P. Charmatz, Caroline E. Jackson, NATI ONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE DEAF LAW AND ADVOCACY CENTER, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellant. Deborah Whittle Durban, Columbia, South Carolina, Donald R. Pocock, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, Winston

- Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublish ed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2

- PER CURIAM: In the present appeal, Michael Godbey ( Godbey ), a male in his mid

- 30s who has been deaf since birth , challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Iredell Memorial Hospital, Inc. ( Iredell ) with respect to his claim for money damages under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (the Act), 29 U.S.C. § 794(a). According to Godbey , Iredell violated section 504 of the Act by failing to ensure effective communication between himself and Iredell staff while a patient at Iredell on s ix occasions in 2010 and on one occasion in 2011. Section 504 of the Act provides that “[n]o otherwise qualified individual with a disability in the Unite d States

. . . shall, solely by reason of her or his disability, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistan ce . . . .” 29 U.S.C.
§ 794(a). In granting summary judgment in favor of Iredell, th e district court held that , although “a genuine issue of fact has been presented as to multiple instances of [Iredell’s] failure to communicate effectively with [Godbey][ ,]” Godbey failed to create a genuine issue of material fact that such failure was caused by Iredell being deliberately indifferent to Godbey’s need to effectively communicate with Iredell staff about his- 3

- medical condition and medical treatment. Godbey v. Iredell Mem’l Hosp. , No. 5:12

- cv - 00004

- RLV

- DSC, 2013 WL 4494708 , at * 7 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 19, 2013). We affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Id. , at *1

- 8. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presen ted in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense; Missile Defense Agency (MDA)/

# ACTION:

Notice of closed meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Missile Defense Advisory Committee will meet in closed session on May 3-4, 2007, in Washington, DC.

                        The mission of the Missile Defense Advisory Committee is to provide the Department of Defense advice on all matters relating to missile defense, including system development, technology, program maturity and readiness of configurations of the Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) to enter the acquisition process. At this meeting, the Committee will receive classified briefings by                               ( print page 20515)                            intelligence officials concerning estimated future developments.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        COL David R. Wolf, Designated Federal Official (DFO) at                         *david.wolf@mda.mil,*                         phone/voice mail (703) 695-6438, or mail at 7100 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-7100.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been determined that this Missile Defense Advisory Committee meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, the meeting will be closed to the public.

Dated: April 18, 2007.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Office, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 07-2042 Filed 4-24-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
#### § 169.689 Demand loads.

Demand loads must meet § 111.60-7 of this chapter except that smaller demand loads for motor feeders are acceptable if the cable is protected at or below its current-carrying capacity.
2:02-cv-72394-VAR Doc # 1 Filed 06/11/02 Pg 1 of 17 Pg ID 1
2:02-cv-72394-VAR Doc # 1 Filed 06/11/02 Pg 2 of 17 Pg ID 2
2:02-cv-72394-VAR Doc # 1 Filed 06/11/02 Pg 3 of 17 Pg ID 3
2:02-cv-72394-VAR Doc # 1 Filed 06/11/02 Pg 4 of 17 Pg ID 4
2:02-cv-72394-VAR Doc # 1 Filed 06/11/02 Pg 5 of 17 Pg ID 5
2:02-cv-72394-VAR Doc # 1 Filed 06/11/02 Pg 6 of 17 Pg ID 6
2:02-cv-72394-VAR Doc # 1 Filed 06/11/02 Pg 7 of 17 Pg ID 7
2:02-cv-72394-VAR Doc # 1 Filed 06/11/02 Pg 8 of 17 Pg ID 8
2:02-cv-72394-VAR Doc # 1 Filed 06/11/02 Pg 9 of 17 Pg ID 9
2:02-cv-72394-VAR Doc # 1 Filed 06/11/02 Pg 10 of 17 Pg ID 10
2:02-cv-72394-VAR Doc # 1 Filed 06/11/02 Pg 11 of 17 Pg ID 11
2:02-cv-72394-VAR Doc # 1 Filed 06/11/02 Pg 12 of 17 Pg ID 12
2:02-cv-72394-VAR Doc # 1 Filed 06/11/02 Pg 13 of 17 Pg ID 13
2:02-cv-72394-VAR Doc # 1 Filed 06/11/02 Pg 14 of 17 Pg ID 14
2:02-cv-72394-VAR Doc # 1 Filed 06/11/02 Pg 15 of 17 Pg ID 15
2:02-cv-72394-VAR Doc # 1 Filed 06/11/02 Pg 16 of 17 Pg ID 16
2:02-cv-72394-VAR Doc # 1 Filed 06/11/02 Pg 17 of 17 Pg ID 17
#### § 178.115 Applicability to existing vessels.

Except where specifically stated otherwise, an existing vessel must comply with the intact stability and seaworthiness regulations which were applicable to the vessel on March 10, 1996, or, as an alternative, the vessel may comply with the regulations in this part.

[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 966, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by USCG-2007-0030, 75 FR 78087, Dec. 14, 2010]
| 1. | this Amendment No.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Raptor Pharmaceutical Corp. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |   |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| By: /s/ Christopher M. Starr         |   |
| Christopher M. Starr, Ph.D.          |
| Chief Executive Officer and Director |
| (Principal Executive Officer)        |
|                                                                                         |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| By: /s/ Georgia Erbez                                                                        |   |   |
| Georgia Erbez                                                                                |
| Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer                                             |
| (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
Exhibit 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-18265 and Registration Statement No. 333-11896 of Biofield Corp. on Form S-8
and Form SB-2, respectively, of our report dated April 15, 2005 (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating
to Biofield Corp.'s ability to continue as a going concern and includes an
emphasis of matter paragraph concerning Biofield Corp.'s status as a Development
Stage Enterprise) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Biofield
Corp. for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 and to the reference to us
under the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus, which is part of such
Registration Statement.

/s/ RUSSELL BEDFORD STEFANOU MIRCHANDANI LLP

New York, New York
May 4, 2005
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Onyx Acceptance Corporation
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Don P. Duffy, EVP, CFO and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  |                                                                                                            
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ DON P. DUFFY                                                                                           
| |  |                                                                                                            
| |  | Name: Don P. Duffy
Title: Executive Vice President,CFO and Principal Financial Officer
Date: March 28, 2003

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
and not for any other purpose.
<PAGE>
                           CENTRAL FEDERAL CORPORATION
                                  Exhibit 32.1
                           Section 1350 Certifications

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Central Federal Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Mark S. Allio, Vice Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Therese Ann Liutkus, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Dated: May 13, 2005               By: /s/ Mark S. Allio
                                      -----------------------------------
                                      Mark S. Allio
                                      Vice Chairman of the Board, President and
                                      Chief Executive Officer




Dated: May 13, 2005               By: /s/ Therese Ann Liutkus
                                      -----------------------------------
                                      Therese Ann Liutkus, CPA
                                      Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                                                              26
5:14-cr-20804-JCO-DRG Doc # 18 Filed 12/18/14 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 177
5:14-cr-20804-JCO-DRG Doc # 18 Filed 12/18/14 Pg 2 of 6 Pg ID 178
5:14-cr-20804-JCO-DRG Doc # 18 Filed 12/18/14 Pg 3 of 6 Pg ID 179
5:14-cr-20804-JCO-DRG Doc # 18 Filed 12/18/14 Pg 4 of 6 Pg ID 180
5:14-cr-20804-JCO-DRG Doc # 18 Filed 12/18/14 Pg 5 of 6 Pg ID 181
5:14-cr-20804-JCO-DRG Doc # 18 Filed 12/18/14 Pg 6 of 6 Pg ID 182
Document

EXHIBIT 10.1


PATTERSON COMPANIES, INC.
SUMMARY OF MATERIAL TERMS OF
MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2020


The Company’s named executive officers are eligible for annual incentives, payable in cash, under the Management Incentive Compensation Plan (the “MICP”). The MICP payout targets, which are achieved if the Company meets certain goals set out in the annual operating plan, are approved by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Committee”) each year. The MICP performance measures and their weightings are also approved by the Committee each year. The Committee also reviews and approves a schedule that details the required Company performance and resulting MICP payouts for each performance measure. If the threshold performance goals are met, MICP payouts equal at least 50% of target. The Committee maintains the discretion to vary from the formula to decrease an MICP payout. Actual MICP payouts, which can vary from 0 to 175% of target, are delivered after the Company’s results are known and applied to the MICP.