alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### M A N D A T E

TO THE 117TH DISTRICT COURT of NUECES COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 21st day of

August, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Ramon Pena, Appellant,

v.

The State Of Texas Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-14-00120-CR (Tr.Ct.No. 08-CR-0359-B)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal,

concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court orders

the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

      

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 12th day of January, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7**  **6 53** 

OTAGWYN BROWN , Plaintiff

- Appell ant ,

v.

DR. MICHAEL JONES , Defendant

- Appell ee .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Ellen L. Hollander , District Judge. ( 1 : 13

- c v - 0 2211

- ELH )

Submitted : February 20, 2014 Decided: February 26, 2014

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges

.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Otagwyn Brown , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Otagwyn Brown appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (20 12 ). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Brown v. Jones , No. 1:13

- cv
- 02211

- ELH
(D. Md. Sept. 3, 2013) . We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal c ontentions are adequately presented in the

materials before th is court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with an Amendment to the Annual Report of Migo Software, Inc.,
      formerly known as PowerHouse Technologies Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kent
      Heyman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
      Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Kent HeymanKent
                HeymanChief
                Executive OfficerAugust 30, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Declan French, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Thinkpath Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September
30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Thinkpath Inc.


Date:  November 20, 2006           By:      /S/ DECLAN FRENCH
                                            -----------------
                                            Name:    Declan French
                                            Title:   Chief Executive Officer
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Belcrest Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                        
|   



|Date: July 13, 2007
|-------------------



| | /s/ Andrew C. Frenette
Andrew C. Frenette
Chief Financial Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

32
§ 129.570 Overfill protection. ( a ) This section applies to OSVs of at least 6,000 GT ITC (500 GRT if GT ITC is not assigned).
( b ) Each cargo oil tank with a capacity of 1,000 or more cubic meters (approximately 6,290 barrels) must have one overfill device that is permanently installed on each oil tank, with an intrinsically safe high-level alarm that meets the requirements of this section.
( c ) The high-level alarm and tank overfill alarm required by paragraph (b) of this section must— ( 1 ) Be independent of each other;
( 2 ) Alarm in the event of loss of power to the alarm system or failure of electrical circuitry to the tank level sensor; and
( 3 ) Be able to be checked at the tank for proper operation prior to each transfer or contain an electronic self-testing feature that monitors the condition of the alarm circuitry and sensor.
( d ) The high-level alarm required by paragraph (b) of this section must— ( 1 ) Alarm before the tank overfill alarm, but before the tank capacity goes below 95 percent;
( 2 ) Be appropriately marked at the indicator panel; and
( 3 ) Have audible and visible alarm indications that can be seen and heard on the vessel where oil transfer is controlled.
( e ) The tank overfill alarm required by paragraph (b) of this section must— ( 1 ) Be independent of the oil gauging system;
( 2 ) Alarm early enough to allow the person in charge of transfer operations to stop the transfer operation before the oil tank overflows;
( 3 ) Be appropriately marked at the indicator panel; and
( 4 ) Have audible and visible alarm indications that can be seen and heard on the vessel where oil transfer is controlled and in the cargo deck area.
[USCG-2012-0208, 79 FR 48937, Aug. 18, 2014]
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**  **18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**  **AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Homeland Security Capital Corporation
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed
      with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
      knowledge:




1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date:
                  March 31, 2008By:
              */s/
                  Michael T. Brigante*Name:
              Michael
                  T. BriganteTitle:
              Chief
                  Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Homeland Security Capital Corporation
      and
      will be retained by Homeland Security Capital Corporation and furnished to
      the
      U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
#### Amanda Lewis and others, *Appellants, v.*Frank Manning and Pierson D. Ogden, *Respondents*.

Order reversed, with costs. ' Opinion by

Eumsey, J.
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.008-2 Conditions of approval. ( a ) Bulkhead panel material shall be of such quality as to successfully meet the requirements for an incombustible material as set forth in subpart 164.009 of this part.
( b ) Bulkhead panels used in Class B-15 construction and as a component in Class A-30 or Class A-15 construction shall meet the thermal insulation requirements of § 164.008-4(a) for at least 15 minutes, and the integrity requirements of § 164.008-4(b) for at least 30 minutes.
( c ) Bulkhead panels for use as a component in Class A-60 construction shall meet the thermal insulation requirements of § 164.008-4(a) for at least 15 minutes and the integrity requirements of § 164.008-4(b) for at least 60 minutes.
( d ) The product shall be so marked as to be readily identifiable to an inspector in the field. The marking shall include the Coast Guard approval number.
( e ) The specimen to be tested shall be representative of the typical installation on board a vessel and any limitations shall be shown on the sketch required by § 164.008-7(a)(7).
( f ) The bulkhead panel shall successfully pass the retests required by § 164.008-6.
#### George C. Harrington, Administrator, *etc., of*Harriet E. Christy, *Deceased, Respondent, v.*Eugene M. Keteltas and Henry W. Clark, *Executors, etc., of*William A. Keteltas, *Deceased, Appellants*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Davis, R. J.
#### § 167.05-40 Underwater survey.

*Underwater survey* means the examination of the vessel's underwater hull including all through-hull fittings and appurtenances, while the vessel is afloat.

[USCG-2000-6858, 67 FR 21082, Apr. 29, 2002]
# C_2012089EN.01002903.xml

| 24.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/29

---

Order of the General Court of 9 February 2012 — Germany v Commission

(Case T-500/11) (1)

1

2012/C 89/50

Language of the case: German

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 355, 3.12.2011.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59783, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 148.60 Shipping papers. The shipper of a material listed in Table 148.10 of this part must provide the master or his representative with appropriate information on the cargo in the form of a shipping paper, in English, prior to loading. Information on the shipping paper must include the following: ( a ) The appropriate BCSN. Secondary names may be used in addition to the BCSN;
( b ) The identification number, if applicable;
( c ) The hazard class of the material as listed in Table 148.10 of this part or on the Special Permit for the material;
( d ) The total quantity of the material to be transported;
( e ) The stowage factor;
( f ) The need for trimming and the trimming procedures, as necessary;
( g ) The likelihood of shifting, including angle of repose, if applicable;
( h ) A certificate on the moisture content of the cargo and its transportable moisture limit for cargoes that are subject to liquefaction;
( i ) Likelihood of formation of a wet base;
( j ) Toxic or flammable gases that may be generated by the cargo, if applicable;
( k ) Flammability, toxicity, corrosiveness, and propensity to oxygen depletion of the cargo, if applicable;
( l ) Self-heating properties of the cargo, if applicable;
( m ) Properties on emission of flammable gases in contact with water, if applicable;
( n ) Radioactive properties, if applicable;
( o ) The name and address of the U.S. shipper (consignor) or, if the shipment originates in a foreign country, the U.S. consignee.
( p ) A certification, signed by the shipper, that bears the following statement: “This is to certify that the above named material is properly named, prepared, and otherwise in proper condition for bulk shipment by vessel in accordance with the applicable regulations of the U.S. Coast Guard.”
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.037-7 Procedure for approval. ( a ) Signals are approved by the Coast Guard under the procedures in subpart 159.005 of this chapter.
( b ) [Reserved]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case Number: 14-cr-20581 

 v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

JUSTIN PAUL HAUGHTON, 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING 

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA 

AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT 

On March 24, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris conducted a plea 

hearing pursuant to Defendant’s consent. The Magistrate Judge issued her report on March 24, 

2015, recommending that this Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty. 

Although the Magistrate Judge’s report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may 

object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, 

neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the 

Magistrate Judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and 

recommendation waives any further right to appeal. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, 

ECF No. 22, is ADOPTED. 

 It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s plea of guilty is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 

Plea Agreement, ECF No. 21, is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT. 

Dated: April 13, 2015 s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

1:14-cr-20581-TLL-PTM Doc # 25 Filed 04/13/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 95
PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on April 13, 2015. 

 s/Karri Sandusky 

 Karri Sandusky, Acting Case Manager 

1:14-cr-20581-TLL-PTM Doc # 25 Filed 04/13/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 96
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       6
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER> 5
   <NAME> BELCREST CAPITAL FUND LLC


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                    4,324,432,435
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                   4,444,201,019
<RECEIVABLES>                               25,852,885
<ASSETS-OTHER>                               4,311,401
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           4,474,365,305
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                             0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                  1,070,000,000
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                    7,734,712
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                      1,077,734,712
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                          3,396,630,593
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                             0
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                       32,170,401
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                        5,148,858
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                            0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                              0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                 (103,745,263)
<NET-ASSETS>                             3,396,630,593
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                           41,802,678
<INTEREST-INCOME>                            3,167,047
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                              36,641,703
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      8,328,022
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                     4,800,344
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                (134,157,593)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                    (121,029,227)
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                            0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                     27,242,741
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                  (221,198)
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                   2,852,427,758
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                            0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                        3,920,436
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          23,582,342
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                             37,804,076
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                     1,535,691,879
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                           105.69
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                   0.59
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                         (0.70)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                              0.00
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                         0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                             105.58
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   3.19


</TABLE>
# C_2008219EN.01001001.xml

| 28.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 219/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 219/10

---

View of the representative of the EFTA States concerning a preliminary draft decision relating to Case COMP/E-1/38.113 — Prokent/Tomra

Meeting on 27 March 2006 of the EC Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions

(2008/C 219/11)

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with Commission's conclusion as regards the gravity of the infringement. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with Commission's conclusion as regards the gravity of the infringement.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's conclusion as regards the starting amount of the fine. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's conclusion as regards the starting amount of the fine.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's conclusion as regards the duration of the infringement. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's conclusion as regards the duration of the infringement.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that there are no:






  1. | aggravating circumstances; |
| --- | --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that there are no:

1.

aggravating circumstances;

| 2. | attenuating circumstances. |
| --- | --- |

2.

attenuating circumstances.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines for the infringement of Article 82 of the EC Treaty. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines for the infringement of Article 82 of the EC Treaty.

| 6. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

| 7. | The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account all the other points raised during the discussion. |
| --- | --- |

7.

The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account all the other points raised during the discussion.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive and Acting Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer of Human BioSystems (the "Company"),  hereby certify, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company  for  the  quarter ended March 31, 2008  (the "Report") fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  and that information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: May 15, 2008

/s/Harry Masuda

Harry Masuda

Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.107-4 Approval procedures. ( a ) Manufacturers that desire type approval should submit a written notice to the Commandant (CG-ENG-4) describing the product and its intended uses. The Commandant will evaluate this information and notify the manufacturer of the product's suitability for testing. The manufacturer should then contract directly with an accepted independent laboratory to perform the required tests and inspections.
( b ) Upon completion of the required testing and inspections, the manufacturer must submit either a written request for type approval to the Commandant (CG-ENG-4), United States Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, or electronically submit a request to *typeapproval@uscg.mil*. The request must indicate the name and address of the manufacturer, all product designations, and the address of all manufacturing facilities. The request must include a copy of the final fire test report and the production inspection procedures. From the information submitted, the Commandant determines whether or not the product is acceptable for type approval. If the product is determined to be acceptable, a type approval certificate valid for a 5-year period will be issued. If the product is not accepted, the manufacturer will be notified of the reasons why.
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.1370 Pressure gauge and vacuum gauge marking.

Each pressure gauge and vacuum gauge under § 154.1335(a) must be marked with the maximum and minimum pressures that are specified on the vessel's certificate for the cargo carried.