alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013189EN.01002203.xml

| 29.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/22

---

Order of the General Court of 16 May 2013 — BybyOKD v Commission

(Case T-559/11) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - State aid - Sale by the Czech Republic of its minority shareholding in the company OKD as part of a privatisation - Decision finding no State aid - Professional association - No individual concern - Concept of party concerned - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 189/46

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sdružení nájemníků BybyOKD.cz (Ostrava, Czech Republic) (represented by: R. Pelikán, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision C(2011) 4927 final of 13 July 2011 concerning the sale to Karbon Invest a.s. of the minority shareholding of the Czech State in OKD a.s. and declaring that that sale did not constitute State aid (State aid No SA.25076 (2011/NN) (OJ 2011 C 225, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Sdružení nájemníků BybyOKD.cz shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Sdružení nájemníků BybyOKD.cz shall pay the costs.

| 3. | There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of RPG Industries Limited. |
| --- | --- |

3.

There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of RPG Industries Limited.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 14.1.2012.

1

---
§ 143.570 Electrical grounding and ground detection. ( a ) An ungrounded distribution system must be provided with a ground detection system located at the main switchboard or distribution panel that provides continuous indication of circuit status to ground, with a provision to temporarily remove the indicating device from the reference ground.
( b ) A dual voltage or grounded electrical distribution system must have the neutral suitably grounded. There must be only one connection to ground, regardless of the number of power sources. This connection must be at the main switchboard or distribution panel.
( c ) On a metallic towing vessel, a grounded distribution system must be grounded to the hull. This grounded system must be connected to a common, non-aluminum ground plate. The ground plate must have only one connection to the main switchboard or distribution panel, and the connection must be readily accessible for examination.
( d ) On a nonmetallic towing vessel, all electrical equipment must be grounded to a common ground. Multiple ground plates bonded together are acceptable.
( e ) Each grounding conductor of a cable must be identified by one of the following means: ( 1 ) Green braid or green insulation; or
( 2 ) Stripping the insulation from the entire exposed length of the grounding conductor.
( f ) A towing vessel's hull may not carry current as a conductor, except for an impressed-current cathodic-protection system or a battery system used to start an engine.
( g ) Cable armor may not be used to ground electrical equipment or systems.
( h ) Each receptacle outlet and attachment plug for a portable lamp, tool, or similar apparatus operating at 100 or more volts must have a grounding pole and a grounding conductor in the portable cord.
( i ) In a grounded distribution system, only grounded, three-prong appliances may be used. This does not apply to double-insulated appliances or tools and appliances of 50 volts or less.
§ 194.05-5 Chemicals in the chemistry laboratory. ( a ) Small working quantities of chemical stores in the chemistry laboratory which have been removed from the approved shipping container need not be marked or labeled as required by 49 CFR part 172. Reagent containers in the laboratory shall be marked to show at least the following: ( 1 ) Common chemical name.
( 2 ) Hazards, if any; e.g., flammable, poison, etc.
( b ) In the interest of facilitating scientific activities, no restrictions are intended which will limit the variety of chemical stores which may be used in the chemical laboratory. With the knowledge and approval of the master, the laboratory supervisor may be responsible for stowage and use of materials within the laboratory and chemical storeroom.
( c ) Reagent containers shall be properly secured against shifting and spillage. Insofar as practical all reagents shall be stowed in suitable, unbreakable containers.
[CGFR 67-83, 33 FR 1151, Jan. 27, 1968, as amended by CGD 86-033, 53 FR 36027, Sept. 16, 1988]
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 151.40-10 Operational requirements.

Control systems, required by Table 151.05 shall be provided with an audible or visual high cargo temperature or high cargo pressure alarm which is discernible at the towboat. The alarm shall operate when either the pressure or the temperature exceeds the operating limits of the system. The alarm may monitor either pressure or temperature, but must be independent of the control system.
# C_2013377EN.01002002.xml

| 21.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 377/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 377/20

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 November 2013 — Bartha v Commission

(Case F-104/11) (1)

1

(Civil Service - Open competition EPSO/AD/56/06 - Reopening of the competition procedure - Measures of execution of the judgment in Case F-50/08)

2013/C 377/45

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gabór Bartha (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P. Homoki, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall, B. Bottka, A, Sipos, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of EPSO decision to reopen the procedure for open competition EPSO/AD/56/06 and the decision of the selection board relating to the results of competition EPSO/AD/56/06 — Administrator grade A5 with Hungarian citizenship and payment of compensation

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Bartha to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Bartha to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2013, p. 68.

1

---
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cr-20780 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

CURTIS SCOTT, 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANT’S MOTION 

FOR A COURT ORDER REQUIRING THE RELEASE OF HIS MEDICAL 

RECORDS (ECF #532) 

On May 15, 2019, Defendant Cutis Scott filed a motion in which he requested 

that the Court enter an order requiring the Wayne County Jail to send him certain 

medical records. (See Mot., ECF #532.)1

 At the May 10, 2019, on-the-record status 

conference, Scott’s (now terminated) counsel informed Scott that based on her 

review of the matter, he does not need a court order to obtain the medical records 

that he requests. Instead, Scott need only fill out certain forms requesting the 

records. Counsel has now provided the required forms to Scott for him to complete 

and return to her. (See ECF #531.) She has pledged to send the completed 

                                                            

1

 Scott also requested in this motion that the Court terminate the appearance of his 

counsel, Kimberly Stout. (See Mot., ECF #532.) The Court granted that portion of 

Scott’s motion in a separate written order. (See Order, ECF #535.) 
2 

documents, with the required check for the records, to the Wayne County Jail after 

Scott completes the forms and returns them to her. If Scott follows this process – a 

procedure that he acknowledged on the record at the May 10, 2019, status conference 

was an appropriate way for him to obtain the records – he will be able to obtain the 

records without a court order. 

For all of these reasons, Scott has not shown that a court order is necessary. 

Accordingly, his request for such an order is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: May 16, 2019 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on May 16, 2019, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (810) 341-9764
#### § 169.743 Portable magazine chests.

Portable magazine chests must be marked in letters at least 3 inches high: “PORTABLE MAGAZINE CHEST—FLAMMABLE—KEEP LIGHTS AND FIRE AWAY.”
|Household Finance Corporation                                          |               
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------
|Household Consumer Loan Corporation                                    |               
|Household Consumer Loan Trust 1996-1                                   |               
|**********************************************************************
|                                                                       |               
|Original Principal Class A                                             | 638,400,000.00
|Number of Class A Bonds (000's)                                        | 638,400.00    
|Original Principal Class B                                             | 136,244,640.00
|Number of Class B Bond (000's)                                         | 136,244.64    
|Original Principal Certificates                                        | 25,455,360.00 
|Number of Certificate Bond (000's)                                     | 25,455.36     
|                                                                       |               
|Distribution Date                                                      |               
|Days                                                                   |               
|                                                                       |               
|CLASS A                                                                |               
|Principal Distribution                                                 |               
|Interest Distribution                                                  |               
|                                                                       |               
|                                                                       |               
|CLASS B                                                                |               
|Principal Distribution                                                 |               
|Interest Distribution                                                  |               
|                                                                       |               
|                                                                       |               
|CERTIFICATES                                                           |               
|Principal Distribution                                                 |               
|Interest Distribution                                                  |
###### Editorial Note on Part 160

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 160.151-1 Scope.

This subpart prescribes standards, tests, and procedures for approval by the Coast Guard of inflatable liferafts. This subpart does not apply to any inflatable liferaft approved by the Commandant before November 10, 2011, so long as the liferaft satisfies the annual servicing requirements set forth in 46 CFR 160.151-57.

[USCG-2010-0048, 76 FR 62996, Oct. 11, 2011, as amended by 76 FR 70062, Nov. 10, 2011]
- 4454
- 4455
- 4456
- 4457
- 4458
- 4459
- 4460
- 4461
- 4462
- 4463
- 4464
- 4465
- 4466
- 4467
- 4468
- 4469
- 4470
- 4471
- 4472
- 4473
- 4474
- 4475
- 4476
- 4477
- 4478
- 4479
- 4480
- 4481
- 4482
- 4483
- 4484
- 4485
- 4486
- 4487
- 4488
- 4489
# C_2011269EN.01005001.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/50

---

Action brought on 20 June 2011 — Brainlab v OHIM (BrainLAB)

(Case T-326/11)

2011/C 269/111

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Brainlab AG (Feldkirchen, Germany) (represented by J. Bauer, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 April 2011 in Case R 1596/2010-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 April 2011 in Case R 1596/2010-4;

| — | Refer the case back to the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) for a decision on the question whether all due care was taken in respect of the renewal of the relevant Community trade mark BrainLAB, No 1 290 113; |
| --- | --- |

—

Refer the case back to the Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) for a decision on the question whether all due care was taken in respect of the renewal of the relevant Community trade mark BrainLAB, No 1 290 113;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark BrainLAB for goods and services in Classes 9, 10 and 42

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the department ‘Register and associated databases’: Dismissal of the application for restitutio in integrum as regards the time-limit for filing the request for renewal and paying the renewal fee

Decision of the department ‘Register and associated databases’:

restitutio in integrum

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the application for restitutio in integrum and finding that Community trade mark No 1 290 113 had expired

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

restitutio in integrum

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 81 of Regulation No 207/2009 as it was not possible for any of the parties, in spite of all due care required by the circumstances having been taken, to comply with a time-limit vis-à-vis the defendant, as a result of which the loss of a right occurred and the two-month time-limit for the filing of the application for restitutio in integrum was complied with.

Pleas in law:

restitutio in integrum

---
# C_2012025EN.01006903.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/69

---

Action brought on 25 October 2011 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-113/11)

(2012/C 25/134)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the implied decision of the Commission rejecting the applicant’s claim for payment of salary arrears for August 2010

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Civil Service Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decision issued by — or, in any event, attributable to — the Commission, rejecting — howsoever and whether in whole or in part — the claims set out in the application of 30 August 2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision issued by — or, in any event, attributable to — the Commission, rejecting — howsoever and whether in whole or in part — the claims set out in the application of 30 August 2010;

| — | declare that Note Ares (2011)217354 is legally non-existent or, in the alternative, annul that measure (in either case, quatenus opus est); |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that Note Ares (2011)217354 is legally non-existent or, in the alternative, annul that measure (in either case, quatenus opus est);

| — | annul the decision issued by the Commission rejecting, howsoever, the claims set out in the complaint of 14 March 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision issued by the Commission rejecting, howsoever, the claims set out in the complaint of 14 March 2011;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information derived from
financial statements included in OnePoint Communications Corp.'s quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 1999 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                    5,013
<RECEIVABLES>                                   3,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                      389
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               10,052
<PP&E>                                         17,962
<DEPRECIATION>                                  3,034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 75,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          15,428
<BONDS>                                        88,751
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          35,000
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           10
<OTHER-SE>                                      5,370
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   75,250
<SALES>                                        15,080
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               15,080
<CGS>                                          15,096
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  15,096
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               33,432
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             11,489
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (46,968)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (46,968)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                20,506
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (26,462)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (26,462)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (26,462)


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Migo Software, Inc. (the “ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      I,
      Kent Heyman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.






/s/
                Kent HeymanKent
                HeymanChief
                Executive Officer
                March
                  27, 2007




A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
        the
        Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
        upon request.
  The
        foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
        Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be considered filed
        as
        part of the Form 10-K. ****
# THE NAVAJO NATION BEN SHELLY 

### PRESIDENT REX LEE JIM 

### VICE PRESIDENT

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIO N AGE N CY OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PO BOX 339 WI DOW ROCK ARIZONA 86515 Office: 9 2 8/ 871-769 2 Fax: 9 2 8 / 871-7996 h ttp ://www. n ava j o n a ti one p a.org VIA 

### EMAIL August 28,2014 Janet McCabe E n v ironmental Protect io n Agency Acting Assistant Administrator Air a nd Radiation Docket Ma il code : 2822T 1200 P en n sy l va nia Ave nu e NW Washi ngto n , D C 20460 

### R E: Confi rm atio n of Gove rnm e nt-to- Gover nm e n t Co n s ultation wit h the U.S. Environmenta l Protection Agency ("USEPA") on September 15 , 2014 R ega r ·din g USEPA's Proposed C lean Power Plan for Exist in g Power Plants a nd A nti cipated Supp lemental Rulemaking D ear Ms. McCabe: T hi s letter is to co nfirm th e Navajo Nat ion 's participation in the govern me nt- to-gove rnm ent con s ultation wi th USEPA concern in g USE PA 's propo sed cl ea n power pl a n for existi ng power plants an d ant icipated s upp lementa l ruling , w hi c h i s sc he duled fo r Monday, September 15, 2014 at I pm in Sa nta Fe, NM. P l ease co ntac t m e via ema i l to confirm the exact locatio n for thi s meeting. I ca n be reached at s t ep h e nb etsitty @ navajo

- n s n. gov. I fyou have any questio n s, p l ease fee l f ree to contact me v i a e mail or at 928-871-7800
.

Sincere



### ~ 

# !!\(/ (

**tephe~** Etsitty Execut ive Directo r