alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Nextera Enterprises, Inc.
(the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

      (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: November 5, 2004

                                        By: /s/ Michael P. Muldowney
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        President and Chief Financial Officer
                                        (Principal Executive Officer and
                                        Principal Financial Officer)

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.

                                       22
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Bobby Yazdani, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Saba Software, Inc. (the
Company) hereby certify, as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: January 9, 2009



By:

/s/    BOBBY YAZDANIBobby Yazdani Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
#### § 170.190 Stability test procedure modifications.

The authorized Coast Guard representative present at a stability test may allow a deviation from the requirements of §§ 170.180 and 170.185 if the representative determines that the deviation would not decrease the accuracy of the test results.

[CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51218, Sept. 30, 1997, as amended by USCG-2007-0030, 75 FR 78084, Dec. 14, 2010]
§ 169.235 Permission required. ( a ) Repairs or alterations to the hull, machinery, or equipment which affects the safety of the vessel may not be made without the knowledge and approval of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
( b ) Drawings, sketches or written specifications describing the alterations in detail must be submitted to the OCMI. Proposed alterations must be approved by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, before work is started.
( c ) Drawings are not required for repairs or replacements in kind.
#### § 176.818 Sanitary inspection.

At each inspection for certification and at every other vessel inspection, quarters, toilet and washing spaces, galleys, serving pantries, lockers, and similar spaces may be examined to determine that they are serviceable and in a sanitary condition.
#### Same *v.*Philip Schmitt, *Appellant*.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2288 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2288

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend Public Law 106-392 to maintain annual base funding for the 
Upper Colorado and San Juan fish recovery programs through fiscal year 
                                 2023.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Endangered Fish Recovery Programs 
Improvement Act of 2010''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF FISH RECOVERY PROGRAMS.

     Section 3(d)(2) of Public Law 106-392 (114 Stat. 1604 and 1605) is 
amended by inserting at the end the following: ``For fiscal years 2012 
through 2023, there are hereby authorized to be appropriated such sums 
as may be necessary to provide for the annual base funding for the 
Recovery Implementation Programs above and beyond the continued use of 
power revenues to fund the operation and maintenance of capital 
projects and monitoring.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 18, 2010.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2288

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend Public Law 106-392 to maintain annual base funding for the 
Upper Colorado and San Juan fish recovery programs through fiscal year 
                                 2023.
```
# C_2014395EN.01003102.xml

| 10.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 395/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 395/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 September 2014 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission

(Case T-498/11) (1)

((Public service contracts - Tender procedure - Renovation of a website - Rejection of a tenderer’s tender - Award of contract to another tenderer - Action for annulment - Obligation to state reasons - Award criteria - Manifest errors of assessment - Claim for damages))

(2014/C 395/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, M. Dermitzakis and N. Theologou, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude and F. Moro, Agents, assisted by P. Wytinck and T. Ruys, lawyers)

Re:

Application (i) for annulment of the decision of the Publications Office of the European Union rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant concerning a supply of services relating to the revamping of the website of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and of the decision to award the contract to another tenderer, and (ii) for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 26.11.2011.

---
# C_2011340EN.01004201.xml

| 19.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/42

---

Action brought on 29 August 2011 — ZZ and Others v Court of Justice

(Case F-84/11)

2011/C 340/87

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ZZ and Others (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the Court of Justice rejecting the applicants’ request for payment of the allowance for continuous work or shiftwork provided for in Article 1 of Council Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 300/76 of 9 February 1976 determining the categories of officials entitled to allowances for shiftwork, and the rates and conditions thereof (OJ 1976 L 38, p. 1) and damages

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment of the Appointing Authority’s decision of 17 May 2011 rejecting the applicants’ request of 17 January 2011 for, first, payment of the allowance for shiftwork provided for in Article 1 of Council Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 300/76 of 9 February 1976, as most recently amended by Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) of 11 December 2006, and, second, compensation for the damage caused by the Appointing Authority’s failure to reply to their first or to their second request within the statutory time-limit and its failure to indicate the available remedies in the express rejection which caused the loss of their chance to succeed in legal proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the Appointing Authority’s decision of 17 May 2011 rejecting the applicants’ request of 17 January 2011 for, first, payment of the allowance for shiftwork provided for in Article 1 of Council Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 300/76 of 9 February 1976, as most recently amended by Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) of 11 December 2006, and, second, compensation for the damage caused by the Appointing Authority’s failure to reply to their first or to their second request within the statutory time-limit and its failure to indicate the available remedies in the express rejection which caused the loss of their chance to succeed in legal proceedings;

| — | Order the Court of Justice to pay to each applicant a sum of EUR 10 700,76 as compensation for their material damage and a sum of EUR 3 000 each for non-material damage; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Court of Justice to pay to each applicant a sum of EUR 10 700,76 as compensation for their material damage and a sum of EUR 3 000 each for non-material damage;

| — | Order the Court of Justice to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Court of Justice to pay the costs.

---
§ 167.55-1 Draft marks and draft indicating systems. ( a ) All vessels must have draft marks plainly and legibly visible upon the stem and upon the sternpost or rudderpost or at any place at the stern of the vessel as may be necessary for easy observance. The bottom of each mark must indicate the draft.
( b ) The draft must be taken from the bottom of the keel to the surface of the water at the location of the marks.
( c ) In cases where the keel does not extend forward or aft to the location of the draft marks, due to a raked stem or cut away skeg, the draft must be measured from a line projected from the bottom of the keel forward or aft, as the case may be, to the location of the draft marks.
( d ) In cases where a vessel may have a skeg or other appendage extending locally below the line of the keel, the draft at the end of the vessel adjacent to such appendage must be measured to a line tangent to the lowest part of such appendage and parallel to the line of the bottom of the keel.
( e ) Draft marks must be separated so that the projections of the marks onto a vertical plane are of uniform height equal to the vertical spacing between consecutive marks.
( f ) Draft marks must be painted in contrasting color to the hull.
( g ) In cases where draft marks are obscured due to operational constraints or by protrusions, the vessel must be fitted with a reliable draft indicating system from which the bow and stern drafts can be determined.
[CGD 89-037, 57 FR 41824, Sept. 11, 1992]
Page 1 of 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, Civil No. 4:14-cv-11764 

vs. Honorable Linda V. Parker 

ONE (1) PIPER CHEYENNE PA-42-1000 Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen 

AIRCRAFT, BEARING TAIL NUMBER N3SP, 

SERIAL NUMBER 42-5527018, INCLUDING 

ALL SETS OF KEYS, FLIGHT LOGS AND 

MAINTENANCE LOGS; 

 Defendant in Rem. 

___________________________________________/ 

ORDER TO TERMINATE ATTORNEY STEVEN MICHAEL CHAIT 

AS PARTY/DEFENDANT 

The Court being fully advised in the premises; 

Attorney Steven M. Chait represents Claimant, Chase Air, Inc. Upon 

electronically filing the Claim on behalf of Chase Air, Inc., Steven Michael Chait was 

erroneously entered as Defendant in the above case, therefore: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Steven Michael Chait be terminated from case 

as a Party/Defendant. 

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that Chase Air, Inc., be added to the 

docket as a Party/Claimant. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

s/ Linda V. Parker 

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

Dated: August 20, 2014 

4:14-cv-11764-LVP-RSW Doc # 12 Filed 08/20/14 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 56
**EXHIBIT
      32**











**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL**


**OFFICER
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Carey G. Birmingham, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
      Report of International Test Systems, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter
      ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
      in
      such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
      condition and results of operations of International Test Systems,
      Inc.





Date:
      May
      11, 2007





By: */s/
      Carey G. Birmingham*


Carey
      G.
      Birmingham,


Chief
      Executive Officer and


Principal
      Accounting Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel, Racial Difference in Stroke.                    

*Date:*                         January 25-26, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         7:30 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites Hotel, 2300 Woodcrest Place, Birmingham, AL 35209.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Katherine Woodbury, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd, Suite 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, (301) 496-5980,                         *kw47o@nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 5, 2007.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-177 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.532 Valves: Cargo tank MARVS greater than 69 kPa gauge (10 psig). ( a ) Except connections for tank safety relief valves and except for liquid level gauging devices other than those under §§ 154.536 and 154.1310, liquid and vapor connections on a cargo tank with a MARVS greater than 69 kPa gauge (10 psig) must have, as close to the tank as practical, a: ( 1 ) Stop valve capable of local manual operation; and
( 2 ) A remotely controlled quick-closing shut-off valve.
( b ) If the nominal pipe size of a liquid or vapor connection is less than 50 mm (2 in.), an excess flow valve may be substituted for the quick-closing valve under paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) One valve may be substituted for the manual controlled stop valve and the remotely controlled quick-closing shut-off valve required under paragraph (a) of this section if that valve: ( 1 ) Meets §§ 154.540 and 154.544; and
( 2 ) Is capable of local manual operation.
2:14-cv-11767-LJM-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 1 of 12 Pg ID 1
2:14-cv-11767-LJM-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 2 of 12 Pg ID 2
2:14-cv-11767-LJM-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 3 of 12 Pg ID 3
2:14-cv-11767-LJM-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 4 of 12 Pg ID 4
2:14-cv-11767-LJM-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 5 of 12 Pg ID 5
2:14-cv-11767-LJM-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 6 of 12 Pg ID 6
2:14-cv-11767-LJM-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 7 of 12 Pg ID 7
2:14-cv-11767-LJM-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 8 of 12 Pg ID 8
2:14-cv-11767-LJM-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 9 of 12 Pg ID 9
2:14-cv-11767-LJM-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 10 of 12 Pg ID 10
2:14-cv-11767-LJM-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 11 of 12 Pg ID 11
2:14-cv-11767-LJM-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 05/02/14 Pg 12 of 12 Pg ID 12
#### § 182.100 Intent.

This part contains requirements for the design, construction, installation, and operation of propulsion and auxiliary machinery, piping and pressure systems, steering apparatus, and associated safety systems. Machinery and equipment installed on each vessel must be suitable for the vessel and its operation and for the purpose intended. All machinery and equipment must be installed and maintained in such a manner as to afford adequate protection from causing fire, explosion, machinery failure, and personnel injury.
# C_2019044EN.01005101.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/51

---

Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — CB v Commission

(Case T-619/11) (1)

((State aid - German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying losses forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market - Annulment of the contested measure by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2019/C 44/65)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: CB (represented by: initially, T. Hackemann and H. Horstkotte, then, T. Hackemann and F. von Bredow, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Adam, then, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially T. Henze, K. Petersen and R. Kanitz, then, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and K. Stranz and finally, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and S. Eisenberg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel) (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 26).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

| 2. | The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by CB; |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by CB;

| 3. | The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 39, 11.2.2012.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2131 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2131

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine

                                 An Act

 
  To amend the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 to 
 reauthorize the United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF UNITED STATES ADVISORY COMMISSION ON 
PUBLIC DIPLOMACY.
    Section 1334 of the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 
1998 (22 U.S.C. 6553) is amended by striking ``October 1, 2009'' and 
inserting ``October 1, 2010''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```