alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
December II, 2012 

Colleen Cripps, Administrator 

Nevada Division of Environmental Protection 

901 South Stewart Street, Suite 4001 

Carson City, Nevada 8970 l-5249 

Air 

CLARK COUNTY • DEPARTMENT OF AIR QUALITY 

4701 W. Russell Road Suite 200 ·Las Vegas, NV 89118-2231 

(702) 455-5942 • Fax (702) 383-9994 

Lewis Wallen meyer Director • Tina Gingras Assistant Director 

Re: Clark County Nitrogen Dioxide Infrastructure State Implementation Plan 

Dear Dr. Cripps: 

The Clark County Department of Air Quality is pleased to submit the Clark County Nitrogen Dioxide 

Infrastructure Stale Implementation Plan (N02 I-SIP) for inclusion in the Nevada Nitrogen Dioxide 

Infrastructure State Implementation Plan. This Plan satisfies the requirements of Sections 11 0( a)( I) and (2) 

of the Clean Air Act. 

The submittal includes two paper copies and two electronic copies (including attachments). Please forward 

one printed and one electronic copy to the Region 9 office of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 

We certify that the electronic copy is an exact duplicate of the original paper copy. 

If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Jean-Paul Huys at (702) 455-1684. 

Sincerely, 

Lewt

f;l~ s Wallenmeyer 

Director 

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 

Susan Brager, Chair • Steve Sisolak, Vice-Chairman 

Larry Brown • Tom Collins • Chris Giunchigliani 

Mary Beth Scow • Lawrence Weekly 

Don Burnette, County Manager 
Dr. Colleen Cripps 

December 6, 2012 

Page 2 

Attachment: 

Clark County Nitrogen Dioxide Infrastructure State Implementation Plan 

cc: Dennis Ransel, Planning Manager, DAQ 

Rob Bamford, Chief, Bureau of Air Quality Planning, NDEP 

Adele Malone, Supervisor, NDEP
#### § 630.660 Recipient.

*Recipient* means any individual, corporation, partnership, association, unit of government (except a Federal agency) or legal entity, however organized, that receives an award directly from a Federal agency.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PRIVATE BUSINESS, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,138
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,484
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,237
<PP&E>                                          11,535
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,896
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,848
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (32,552)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,896
<SALES>                                         41,919
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,919
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,852
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,750
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,835
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,915
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,447
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       468
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
# C_2011282EN.01005101.xml

| 24.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/51

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 July 2011 — Alari v Parliament

(Case F-38/11) (1)

1

(Staff case - Officials - Promotion - 2009 promotion exercise - Transfer from one institution to another during promotion exercise in which the official would have been promoted in his institution of origin - Institution with competence to decide on promotion of the transferred official)

2011/C 282/95

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gianluigi Alari (Bertrange, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J. N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Alves and M. Ecker, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant in the 2009 promotion exercise.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Tribunal:

| 1. | dismisses the action as manifestly lacking any foundation in law; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action as manifestly lacking any foundation in law;

| 2. | orders the European Parliament to pay the applicant’s costs and to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the European Parliament to pay the applicant’s costs and to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 179 of 18.06.11, p. 22

1

---
Argued and submitted February 28,

conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing April 17, 1996

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*RICHARD DOYLE BAKER, *Appellant.*

(93-1290C2; CA A89333)

914 P2d 717

Louis R. Miles, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing. *State v. McFee,*136 Or App 160, 901 P2d 870, *rev allowed*322 Or 362 (1995).
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2228 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2228

 To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to allow 
States to count certain students formerly identified as limited English 
proficient as being within the limited English proficient subgroup, and 
 certain students formerly identified as students with disabilities as 
         being within the students with disabilities subgroup.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 2009

 Mr. Boozman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to allow 
States to count certain students formerly identified as limited English 
proficient as being within the limited English proficient subgroup, and 
 certain students formerly identified as students with disabilities as 
         being within the students with disabilities subgroup.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALLOWING STATES TO COUNT CERTAIN STUDENTS FORMERLY 
              IDENTIFIED AS LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENT OR AS STUDENTS 
              WITH DISABILITIES AS CONTINUING TO BE MEMBERS OF THAT 
              SUBGROUP.

    Section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v)(II) of the Elementary and Secondary 
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311(b)(2)(C)(v)(II)) is amended--
            (1) in item (cc) by inserting before the semicolon the 
        following: ``, which may, at the discretion of the State, 
        include students who no longer are identified as students with 
        disabilities but who were, in any of the preceding three school 
        years, identified as students with disabilities''; and
            (2) in item (dd) by inserting before the semicolon the 
        following: ``, which may, at the discretion of the State, 
        include students who no longer are identified as students with 
        limited English proficiency but who were, in any of the 
        preceding three school years, identified as students with 
        limited English proficiency''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 169.113 Right of appeal.

Any person directly affected by a decision or action taken under this part, by or on behalf of the Coast Guard, may appeal therefrom in accordance with subpart 1.03 of this chapter.

[CGD 88-033, 54 FR 50381, Dec. 6, 1989]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          14,974
<SECURITIES>                                       482
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,436
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,467
<PP&E>                                          14,429
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  96,786
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,029
<BONDS>                                            104
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          5
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    58,046
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,453
<CGS>                                           10,135
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,291
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (13,654)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (5,302)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (10,294)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,249)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
II 

Calendar No. 201 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2004 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

NOVEMBER 4, 2009 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4282 Beach Street in Akron, Michigan, as 

the ‘‘Akron Veterans Memorial Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AKRON VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 4282 Beach Street in Akron, 

6 Michigan, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Akron 

7 Veterans Memorial Post Office’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2004 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Akron Veterans Me5 morial Post Office’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 201 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2004 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postrial Post Office’’. Akron, Michigan, as the ‘‘Akron Veterans Memo- al Service located at 4282 Beach Street in 

NOVEMBER 4, 2009 

Reported without amendment 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 151.03-41 Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI).

This term means any person from the civilian or military branch of the Coast Guard designated as such by the Commandant and who, under the superintendence and direction of the Coast Guard District Commander, is in charge of an inspection zone for the performance of duties with respect to the enforcement and administration of Subtitle II of Title 46, U.S. Code, Title 46 and Title 33 U.S. Code, and regulations issued under these statutes.

[CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51209, Sept. 30, 1997]
§ 115.812 Pressure vessels and boilers. ( a ) Pressure vessels must be tested and inspected in accordance with part 61, subpart 61.10, of this chapter.
( b ) Periodic inspection and testing requirements for boilers are contained in § 61.05 in subchapter F of this chapter.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 892, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51348, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-1999-4976, 65 FR 6505, Feb. 9, 2000]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2




                               DURLAND & COMPANY
                         ------------------------------
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                         ------------------------------

              Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
PICK Communications Corp.
Miami, Florida


We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statement on Form S-8
of PICK Communications Corp. of our report dated April 29, 1998, relating to the
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for
the year ended December 31, 1997, which report appears in the December 31, 1999
Annual Report on Form 10-K of PICK Communications Corp.


                                               /s/ Durland & Company, CPAs, P.A.
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Durland & Company, CPAs, P.A.




Palm Beach, Florida
July 6, 2000
Editorial Note on Part 162
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 162.018-4 Construction and workmanship. ( a ) Safety relief valves shall be of either the internal or external spring-loaded type, suitable for the intended service.
( b ) Safety relief valve body, base, bonnet and internals shall be designed for a pressure of not less than the set-pressure of the valve.
( c ) All safety relief valves shall be so constructed that the failure of any part cannot obstruct the free and full discharge of vapors from the valve.
( d ) The nominal size of a safety relief valve shall be the inside diameter of the inlet opening to the individual valve disk. No safety relief valve shall be smaller than 3 ⁄ 4 inch nor larger than 6 inches. Safety relief valves shall have flanged or welded end inlet connections and either flanged or screwed outlet connections, except outlets exceeding 4 inches in diameter shall be flanged.
( e ) Safety relief valves shall be of the angle or straight-through type, fitted with side or top outlet discharge connections.
( f ) ( 1 ) Springs shall not show a permanent set exceeding 1 percent of their free length 10 minutes after being released from a cold compression test closing the spring solid.
( 2 ) Springs may not be re-set for any pressure more than 10 percent above or 10 percent below that for which the valve is marked.
( 3 ) If the operating conditions of a valve are changed so as to require a new spring under paragraph (f)(2) of this section for a different pressure, the valve shall be adjusted by the manufacturer or his authorized representative.
( g ) The design and construction of safety relief valves shall permit easy access for inspection and repair.
( h ) Safety relief valves shall be tapped for not less than 1 ⁄ 4 inch pipe size drain at the lowest practicable point where liquid can collect.
[CGFR 52-43, 17 FR 9540, Oct. 18, 1952]
###### Editorial Note on Part 160

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 160.132-3 Definitions.

In addition to the definitions in the IMO LSA Code (incorporated by reference, see § 160.132-5 of this subpart), in this subpart, the term:

*Commandant* means the Chief of the Lifesaving and Fire Safety Standards Division. Address: Commandant (CG-ENG-4), Attn: Lifesaving and Fire Safety Division, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509; telephone 202-372-1392 or fax 202-372-1924.

*Independent laboratory* has the same meaning as 46 CFR 159.001-3. A list of accepted independent laboratories is available from the Commandant and online at *http://cgmix.uscg.mil.*

*Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI)* means an officer of the Coast Guard designated as such by the Commandant and who fulfills the duties described in 46 CFR 1.01-15(b). The “cognizant OCMI” is the OCMI who has immediate jurisdiction over a vessel or geographic area for the purpose of performing the duties previously described.

*SOLAS* means the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as amended.

[USCG-2010-0048, 76 FR 62979, Oct. 11, 2011, as amended by USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60158, Sept. 30, 2013]
#### § 175.112 Specific applicability for individual parts.

At the beginning of certain parts of this subchapter, a more specific application is given for all or particular portions of that part. This application sets forth the type, size, service, or age of a vessel to which certain portions of that part apply or particular dates by which an existing vessel must comply with certain portions of that part.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.024-2 Type. ( a ) Pistol-projected parachute red flare distress signals specified by this subpart shall be of one type which shall consist essentially of a cartridge having centered primer, propelling charge, and projectile consisting of a case, delay element, expelling charge, and pyrotechnic candle attached to a parachute by shroud lines; the cartridge to be of such dimensions that it can be fitted into and fired from a signal pistol with chamber and bore dimensions within the limits provided by Figure 160.028-2(a) of subpart 160.028 of this chapter.
( b ) [Reserved]
# C_2013063EN.01001803.xml

| 2.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 January 2013 — Gollnisch v Parliament

(Joined Cases T-346/11 and T-347/11) (1)

1

(Privileges and immunities - Member of the European Parliament - Decision to waive immunity - Activity unconnected with the duties of a Member of the European Parliament - Procedure for waiving immunity - Decision not to defend the privileges and immunities - No longer any interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 63/36

Language of the cases: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bruno Gollnisch (Limonest, France) (represented by: G. Dubois, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: R. Passos, D. Moore and K. Zejdová, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, action for annulment of a decision adopted by the European Parliament on 10 May 2011 to waive the immunity of the applicant, and application for compensation for the non-material damage suffered by the applicant in connection therewith and, second, action for annulment of the decision not to defend the immunity of the applicant, adopted by the European Parliament on 10 May 2011, and application for compensation for the non-material damage suffered by the applicant in connection therewith.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the action for annulment and the application for compensation in Case T-346/11; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action for annulment and the application for compensation in Case T-346/11;

| 2. | rules that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action for annulment in Case T-347/11; |
| --- | --- |

2.

rules that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action for annulment in Case T-347/11;

| 3. | dismisses the application for compensation in Case T-347/11; |
| --- | --- |

3.

dismisses the application for compensation in Case T-347/11;

| 4. | orders Bruno Gollnisch to pay the costs, including those relating to the applications for interim measures in Cases T-346/11 and T-347/11. |
| --- | --- |

4.

orders Bruno Gollnisch to pay the costs, including those relating to the applications for interim measures in Cases T-346/11 and T-347/11.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.

1

---
### MANDATE



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00048

- CV

Jamie Genender and Critter Stuff, LLC, Appellant s

v. USA Store Fixtures, LLC, Appellee Appealed from the Co unty Civil Court

at Law No

. 1 of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1016718). Opinion delivered by Justice McCally. Justices Brown and Wise also participating.

TO THE COUNTY CIVIL COURT AT LAW NO

. 1 OF HARRIS COUNTY,
GREETINGS: Before our Court of Appeals on December 23, 2014 , the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment was determined. Our Court of Appeals made its order in these words: This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, USA Store Fixtures, LLC

, signed October 16, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore REFORM the judgment of the court below to delete the following paragraph from the judgment: It is hereby ORDERED that Jamie Michele Genender and Critter Stuff, L.L.C., jointly and severally, pay to USA Store Fixtures the amount of $38,000, representing the reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees in this case and a contingent award of attorneys’ fees in the amount of $20,000 if this case is appealed to the Court of Appeals, and $20,000 if this case is appealed to the Supreme Court
of Texas. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED except as modified in this judgment. We order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.
We further orde r this decision certified below for observance. WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.
WITNESS , the Hon. Kem Thompson Frost , Chief Justice of our Fo urteenth Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Houston, March 6, 2015

.