alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Retail Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Barry L. Lazarus, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.X.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.



|/s/ BARRY L. LAZARUS             
|---------------------------------
|                                 
|Name:          Barry L. Lazarus  
|Chief Financial Officer          
|Date:            November 7, 2003
|                                 



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 65 (Thursday, April 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 16806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1671]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Notice of a Meeting

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of a meeting 
of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 
(SAMHSA) Advisory Committee for Women's Service on April 24, 2007.
    The meeting is open to the public and will include a presentation 
on SAMHSA's Children and Families activities; and discussions on 
SAMHSA's policy issues and programs relating to women.
    Attendance by the public will be limited to the space available. 
Public comments are welcome. Please communicate with the Committee's 
Executive Secretary, Ms. Carol Watkins (see contact information below) 
to make arrangements to comment or to request special accommodations 
for persons with disabilities.
    Substantive program information, a summary of the meeting, and a 
roster of Council members will be available as soon as possible after 
the meeting, either by accessing the SAMHSA Committee's Web site, 
https://www.nac.samhsa.gov, or by contacting Ms. Watkins. The 
transcript for the meeting will also be available on the SAMHSA 
Committee's Web site within three weeks after the meeting.

    Committee Name: SAMHSA Advisory Committee for Women's Service.
    Date/Time/Type: Tuesday, April 24, 2007, from 9 a.m. to 12 noon: 
Open.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Hotel, 100 Heron Boulevard, Cambridge, 
Maryland 21613.
    Contact: Carol Watkins, Executive Secretary, SAMHSA Advisory 
Committee for Women's Services, 1 Choke Cherry Road, Room 8-1002, 
Rockville, Maryland 20857, Telephone: (240) 276-2254; Fax: (240) 
276-1024 and e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bad9dbc8d5d694cddbced1d3d488fac9dbd7d2c9db94d2d2c994ddd5cc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a4c7c5d6cbc88ad3c5d0cfcdca96e4d7c5c9ccd7c58accccd78ac3cbd2">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: March 30, 2007.
Toian Vaughn,
SAMHSA Committee Management Officer
[FR Doc. 07-1671 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 167.05-25 Nautical school ship.

The term *nautical school ship* means a vessel operated by or in connection with a nautical school or an educational institution under Section 13 of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 1986.

[CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25311, May 20, 1996]
EXHIBIT 32.2    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
------------    OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Long Island Financial Corp., (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas
Buonaiuto, Vice President & Secretary-Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.

                                         /s/ Thomas Buonaiuto
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Thomas Buonaiuto
                                         Vice President & Secretary - Treasurer
                                         May 13, 2005
---

List of Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries



|Name                           | Jurisdiction     | Business                                            | % of Ownership
|------------------------------ | ---------------- | --------------------------------------------------- | --------------
|                               |                  |                                                     |               
|DLJ Management Corp.           | Canada           | Management, accounting and
      reporting services | 100%          
|                               |                  |                                                     |               
|Orient Petroleum (NZ) Limited  | New Zealand      | Oil and gas exploration                             | 100%          
|                               |                  |                                                     |               
|Eastern Petroleum (NZ) Limited | New Zealand      | Oil and gas exploration                             | 100%          
|                               |                  |                                                     |               
|Orient Petroleum (PNG) Limited | Papua New Guinea | Oil and gas exploration                             | 100%          

---
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.1816 Cargo location plan. The master shall ensure that: ( a ) A cargo location plan is prepared that gives: ( 1 ) The location and number of each cargo tank; and
( 2 ) The name of the cargo in each tank;
( b ) One cargo location plan is kept with the sets of cargo information cards required under § 154.1814; and
( c ) The cargo names in the cargo location plan do not differ from the names of the cargoes listed in Table 4.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL LEE HUDSON,

Defendant.

 /

Case No. 14-20662

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

ORDER EXTENDING TIME

FOR COMPETENCY EVALUATIONS

On November 13, 2014, this Court entered an Order committing Defendant to

the custody of the Attorney General to be hospitalized for treatment in a suitable

facility for a period not to exceed four (4) months. The Court has received a letter

from the Bureau of Prisons dated May 15, 2015 to which is attached a Forensic

Evaluation Report. Based on the Forensic Evaluation Report, this Court believes

that Defendant should continue to be hospitalized for treatment for a period not to

exceed four (4) months from the date of this Order.

2:14-cr-20662-GCS-MKM Doc # 19 Filed 05/21/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 33
SO ORDERED.

Date: May 21, 2015

s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Brandon M. Bolling, AUSA

Rafael C. Villarruel, FDO

Warden Kenny Atkinson

2

2:14-cr-20662-GCS-MKM Doc # 19 Filed 05/21/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 34
Editorial Note on Part 161
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 161 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49238, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 161.012-7 Construction. ( a ) Each light must be designed to be attached to a PFD without damaging the PFD or interfering with its performance.
( b ) Each light and its power source must be designed to be removed and replaced without causing damage to the PFD.
( c ) The storage life of the power source of a light must be twice as long as the period between the date of manufacture and the expiration date of the power source.
( d ) Each light, prior to activation, must be capable of preventing leakage from its container of any chemicals it contains or produces.
( e ) Each component of a light must be designed to remain serviceable in a marine environment for at least as long as the storage life of the light's power source.
( f ) No light may have a water pressure switch.
( g ) Each light must be designed so that when attached to a PFD, its light beam, at a minimum, is visible in an arc of 180 degrees above or in front of the wearer.
( h ) Each light, including its power source, must fit into a cylindrical space that is 150 mm (6 in.) long and 75 mm (3 in.) in diameter.
( i ) Each light, including its power source, must not weigh more than 225g (8 oz.).
( j ) Each light that is designed to operate while detached from a PFD must have a lanyard that can be used to connect it to the PFD. The lanyard must be at least 750 mm (30 in.) long.
( k ) Each light designed to operate while detached from a PFD must be capable of floating in water with its light source at or above the surface of the water.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I,William Slater, Chief Financial Officer of Saba Software, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certify, as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the bestof my knowledge: 

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2010 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companyat the dates and for the periods indicated. 

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission. 

Date: April 9, 2010
###### Editorial Note on Part 164

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 164.111-1 Scope.

This subpart prescribes requirements for approval of draperies, curtains, and other suspended textiles as required by the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS).
§ 140.905 Official logbooks. ( a ) A towing vessel of the United States, except one on a voyage from a port in the United States to a port in Canada, is required by 46 U.S.C. 11301 to have an official logbook if the vessel is: ( 1 ) On a voyage from a port in the United States to a foreign port; or
( 2 ) Of at least 100 gross tons and on a voyage between a port in the United States on the Atlantic Ocean and one on the Pacific Ocean.
( b ) The Coast Guard furnishes, without fee, to masters of vessels of the United States, the official logbook as Form CG-706B or CG-706C, depending on the number of persons employed as crew. The first several pages of this logbook list various acts of Congress governing logbooks and the entries required in them.
( c ) When a voyage is completed, or after a specified time has elapsed, the master must file the official logbook containing required entries with the cognizant OCMI at or nearest the port where the vessel may be.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 24, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-51174

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OVIDIO MESA-DELUNA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-02-CR-51-ALL

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ovidio Mesa-Deluna appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. MesaDeluna contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)

define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction

that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a

separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been

alleged in his indictment. Mesa-Deluna maintains that he pleaded
No. 02-51174

-2-

guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under

8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the

two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for

that offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Mesa-Deluna acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
###### Editorial Note on Part 160

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 160.115-11 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 153

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 153.209 Bilge pumping systems.

Bilge pumping systems for cargo pumprooms, slop tanks, and void spaces separated from cargo tanks by only a single bulkhead must be entirely within the locations allowed containment systems in § 153.234.
§ 171.050 Passenger heel requirements for a mechanically propelled or a non-self propelled vessel. ( a ) Each mechanically propelled or non-self propelled vessel other than a pontoon vessel must be shown by design calculations, in each condition of loading and operation, to have a metacentric height (GM) in feet (meters) of not less than the value given by the following equation: GM = [(W/Δ)(2 ⁄ 3)(b)]/(tan(T)) Where— Δ = displacement of the vessel in long (metric) tons. W = total weight in long (metric) tons of persons other than required crew, including personal effects of those persons expected to be carried on the vessel. T = 14 degrees or the angle of heel at which the deck edge is first submerged, whichever is less; and b = distance in feet (meters) from the centerline of the vessel to the geometric center of the passenger deck on one side of the centerline.
( b ) The criteria specified in paragraph (a) of this section are limited in application to the conditions of loading and operation of vessels for which the righting arm (GZ) at the angle (T), calculated after the vessel is permitted to trim free until the trimming moment is zero, is not less than the minimum metacentric height (GM) calculated in paragraph (a) of this section multiplied by sin(T). In conditions not meeting this requirement, the Coast Guard Marine Safety Center requires calculations in addition to those in this section.
( c ) A vessel that complies with the requirements for passenger ships contained in the International Code of Intact Stability, 2008 (2008 IS Code) (incorporated by reference, see § 171.012) need not comply with paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section. Vessels complying with the 2008 IS Code must use the Assumed Average Weight per Person obtained according to § 170.090 of this title to be exempt from the other requirements of this section.
[USCG-2007-0030, 75 FR 78085, Dec. 14, 2010]
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.1330 Liquid level alarm system: Independent tank type C. Independent tanks type C need not have the high liquid level alarm system under § 154.1325 if: ( a ) The tank volume is less than 200 m3 (7,060 ft.3); or
( b ) The tank can withstand the maximum possible pressure during loading, that pressure is below the relief valve setting, and overflow of the tank cannot occur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from Balance Sheet,
Statement of Operations, Statement of Cash Flows and Notes thereto incorporated
in Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         170,893
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     74,406
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               260,299
<PP&E>                                           7,986
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,833)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 447,057
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,323,192
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,745
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,422,994
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   447,057
<SALES>                                        221,959
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               221,959
<CGS>                                          245,716
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  245,716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,206,696
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,494,028
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,724,481)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,724,481)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (57,099)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,781,580)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.69)


</TABLE>
#### William P. Roome, *v.*Thomas Riley, *Sheriff, etc*.

Motion granted, without costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
#### § 15.405 Familiarity with vessel characteristics.

Each credentialed crewmember must become familiar with the relevant characteristics of the vessel appropriate to his or her duties and responsibilities prior to assuming those duties and responsibilities. As appropriate, these may include, but are not limited to, general arrangement of the vessel, maneuvering characteristics, proper operation of the installed navigation equipment, proper operation of firefighting and lifesaving equipment, stability and loading characteristics, emergency duties, and main propulsion and auxiliary machinery, including steering gear systems and controls.
No. 6164.

#### Jeff Cravey et al. *v.*The State.

Soma Facias—'Unlawfully Selling Mortgaged Property—Bail Bond which, recites the offense as “unlawfully selling mortgaged property” describes no offense against the law of this State, and can. not be made the basis of a final judgment in a scire facias proceeding.

Appeal from the District Court of San Saba. Tried below before the Hon. A. W. Moursund.

*85Opinion delivered June 30, 1888.

The opinion discloses the cases. Five hundred dollars was the amount of the bail involved.

*W. B. Dunham,*for the appellant:

The bond is invalid because it recites no offense against the law. The recital is that the principal stands charged by indictment with “unlawfully selling mortgaged property.”

In order that such a sale should be an offense it must appear that the sale was fraudulent, and that the property was personal property.’

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Hurt, Judge.

Scire facias. The bond made the basis of the final judgment recites that the principal stands charged by indictment with the offense of “unlawfully selling mortgaged property.”

This recites no offense against the law, and hence the bail bond is invalid and will not support a judgment.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is dismissed.

*Reversed and dismissed,.*
#### § 159.001-5 Correspondence and applications.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76701, Sept. 18, 2024.

Unless otherwise specified, all correspondence and applications in connection with approval and testing of equipment and materials must be addressed to: Commandant (CG-ENG-4), Attn: Lifesaving and Fire Safety Division, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509; telephone 202-372-1392 or fax 202-372-1924.

[USCG-2006-25697, 71 FR 55747, Sept. 25, 2006, as amended by ; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60156, Sept. 30, 2013]
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.017-1 Scope. ( a ) This subpart contains standards and approval and production tests for chain ladders used on a merchant vessel to get on and off the vessel in an emergency.
( b ) The requirements in this subpart apply to a chain ladder designed for use along a vertical portion of a vessel's hull.