AFS-12-432-E July 30, 2012

Exemption No. 5100K Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-10857

Mr. Steven Pennington

Executive Director Department of Defense Policy Board on Federal Aviation 1480 Defense Pentagon Washington, DC 20301-1480

Dear Mr. Pennington:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 5100, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions

and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated May 14, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of the Department of Defense (DOD) for an extension of Exemption No. 5100, as amended. That exemption from §§ 91.117(a) and (b), 91.159(a), and 91.209(a)(1) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows the DOD to conduct air operations in support of drug law enforcement and traffic interdiction w ithout meeting certain requirements pertaining to (1) aircraft speed, (2) cruising altitudes for flights conducted under visual flight rules, and (3) the use of aircraft position lights and anticollision light systems.

In your petition, you requested that this exemption be extended for 3 years. The FAA finds that since this is a long standing exemption it will grant that request.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.2

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to DOD.

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 5100, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the conditions and

limitations listed below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. The pilot of an aircraft engaged in operations authorized herein is not relieved from the requirements of § 91.113.

2. Operations under this exemption are authorized only to the extent necessary for the interdiction aircraft to obtain positive identification of, and maintain visual contact with, a suspect aircraft.

3. The pilot shall ensure that a dedicated observer, in addition to the pilot, is on board the petitioner’s aircraft.

a. That observer’s sole responsibility shall be to assist the pilot in seeing and avoiding other traffic; or

b. When use of a dedicated observer in the interdiction aircraft is not possible due to aircraft configuration, the use of primary radar equipment that is capable of detecting all aircraft operating in the vicinity of the DOD aircraft, or a dedicated spotter aircraft with a qualified observer on board, may be used to assist the pilot of the interdiction aircraft in seeing and avoiding other aircraft.

i. Spotter aircraft or aircraft having onboard primary radar equipment for the purpose of detecting other aircraft must maintain two-way radio communications with the interdiction aircraft to provide the pilot of the interdiction aircraft with advisories regarding the relative positions of

other aircraft in the area.

ii. Spotter aircraft and primary radar surveillance aircraft shall be operated for the sole purpose of detecting other aircraft in the vicinity and advising the pilot of the interdiction aircraft of potential collision hazards and shall not be engaged in the interdiction operation.

4. Operations in noncompliance with § 91.209(a)(1) are authorized only for those aircraft engaged in air interdiction operations and only when one of the following alternative means of deriving traffic information is used:

a. Primary radar equipment capable of detecting all aircraft operating within the vicinity of the DOD interdiction aircraft; or3

b. Spotter aircraft operating in a position to visually detect other aircraft in the vicinity of the interdiction aircraft.

i. Interdiction aircraft must maintain two-way radio communications with the spotter aircraft or the primary radar surveillance aircraft for the purpose of receiving traffic information regarding other aircraft operating in the vicinity.

ii. Only DOD interdiction aircraft are authorized to operate without lighted position/anti-collision lights. Any other aircraft used by the DOD as spotter aircraft or primary radar surveillance aircraft must be operated in compliance with § 91.209(a).

iii. Interdiction aircraft shall operate the aircraft’s position lights to the maximum extent practical and may only operate without lights when necessary to avoid detection by elements engaged in illegal drug

activities.

5. The pilot of an interdiction aircraft shall:

a. Establish two-way radio communication with the appropriate air traffic control (ATC) tower before entering a Class B, Class C, or Class D airspace area;

b. Comply with all instructions and clearance from the tower; and

c. Maintain two-way radio communication with the tower while in those airspace

areas.

6. The DOD shall ensure that all pilots and crewmembers who will conduct airborne drug interdiction operations are thoroughly briefed and have a complete understanding of the conditions and limitations of this exemption.

7. The DOD shall ensure that all aircraft used to conduct operations under this exemption are equipped with a Mode C transponder and that the transponder is operated on the appropriate code or as assigned by ATC.

8. The pilot of an interdiction aircraft may not operate at an altitude in noncompliance with § 91.159(a) within a Class B or Class C airspace area unless specifically authorized by the ATC facility having jurisdiction over that airspace.

9. This exemption is not valid for operations outside the United States.4

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 5100, as amended, to September 30, 2015, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John Duncan Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service