alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.156-17 Marking and labeling. ( a ) Each rescue boat must be marked with a plate or label permanently affixed to the hull in a conspicuous place readily accessible for inspection and sufficiently durable to withstand continuous exposure to environmental conditions at sea for the life of the rescue boat.
( b ) The plate or label must be in English, but may also be in other languages.
( c ) The plate or label must contain the— ( 1 ) Name and address of the manufacturer;
( 2 ) Manufacturer's model identification;
( 3 ) Name of the independent laboratory that witnessed the prototype or production tests;
( 4 ) Serial number of the rescue boat;
( 5 ) U.S. Coast Guard approval number;
( 6 ) Month and year of manufacture;
( 7 ) Material of hull construction;
( 8 ) Number of persons for which the rescue boat is approved;
( 9 ) Light load and full load (condition A and condition B weight); and
( 10 ) Word “SOLAS.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001070680
<NAME> GRAND CENTRAL FINANCIAL CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,422
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      3,395
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          38,367
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            36,129
<LOANS>                                         81,100
<ALLOWANCE>                                        373
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,366
<DEPOSITS>                                      74,530
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                820
<LONG-TERM>                                     44,142
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,855
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 137,366
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,969
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,704
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   152
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,825
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,541
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,539
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,286
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        3
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   6
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,356
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    104
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         104
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       101
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.53
<LOANS-NON>                                        200
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   369
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  373
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               290
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             83


</TABLE>
§ 169.222 Scope of inspection for certification. Items normally included in an Inspection for Certification are: ( a ) Structure.
( b ) Watertight integrity.
( c ) Pressure vessels and appurtenances.
( d ) Piping.
( e ) Auxiliary machinery.
( f ) Steering apparatus.
( g ) Electrical installations.
( h ) Lifesaving appliances.
( i ) Navigation equipment.
( j ) Fire detecting and extinguishing systems.
( k ) Pollution prevention equipment.
( l ) Sanitary conditions.
( m ) Fire hazards.
( n ) Verification of valid certificates issued by the Federal Communications Commission.
( o ) Lights and signals required by navigation rules.
( p ) Bilge and ballast systems.
( q ) Rigging, yards, masts, spars, and sails.
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.500 Cargo and process piping standards.

The cargo liquid and vapor piping and process piping systems must meet the requirements in §§ 154.503 through 154.562, Subparts 56.01 through 56.35, §§ 56.50-20 and 56.50-105, and Subparts 56.60 through 56.97 of this chapter.
#### John Delmers, *Respondent, v.*George Brown, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Hardin, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       6
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER> 5
   <NAME> BELCREST CAPITAL FUND LLC


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                    4,974,948,034
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                   5,635,836,615
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,956,524
<ASSETS-OTHER>                              37,885,331
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           5,687,678,470
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                             0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                  1,530,357,759
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                   97,398,294
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                      1,627,756,053
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                          4,059,922,417
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                             0
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                       31,851,040
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                       33,007,386
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                            0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                              0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                   674,510,419
<NET-ASSETS>                             4,059,922,417
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                           74,860,983
<INTEREST-INCOME>                            8,054,033
<OTHER-INCOME>                              53,631,381
<EXPENSES-NET>                             144,619,883
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                    (8,073,486)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                     2,584,280
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                  293,096,799
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                      287,607,593
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                            0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                        4,427,990
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                              0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                (1,156,346)
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                     139,309,886
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                            0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                       10,173,462
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          77,094,216
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                            147,601,961
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                     3,991,427,079
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                           118.78
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                 (0.25)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                           8.94
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                               0.0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                          0.0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                             127.47
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   4.83


</TABLE>
# C_2013026EN.01004703.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/47

---

Order of the General Court of 26 November 2012 — MIP Metro v OHIM — Real Seguros (real,- BIO)

(Case T-549/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Revocation of earlier national trade marks - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 26/94

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Real Seguros, SA (Porto, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 August 2011 (Case R 115/2011-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Real Seguros, SA and MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

| 2. | The parties shall bear their own costs incurred before the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The parties shall bear their own costs incurred before the General Court.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 7.1.2012.

1

---
#### § 174.090 Permeability of spaces.

When doing the calculations required in [§ 174.065](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-174.065)—

(a) The permeability of a floodable space, other than a machinery space, must be as listed in Table [174.090](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-174.090); and

(b) Calculations in which a machinery space is treated as a floodable space must be based on an assumed machinery space permeability of 85%, unless the use of an assumed permeability of less than 85% is justified in detail.

Table [174.090](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-174.090)—Permeability

| Spaces and tanks | Permeability (percent) |
| --- | --- |
| Storeroom spaces | 60. |
| Accommodation spaces | 95. |
| Voids | 95. |
| Consumable liquid tanks | 95 or 0.1 |
| Other liquid tanks | 95 or 0.2 |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1 Whichever results in the more disabling condition. | |
| 2 If tanks are partially filled, the permeability must be determined from the actual density and amount of liquid carried. | |
# C_2008316EN.01001701.xml

| 11.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 316/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 316/17

---

Notice to economic operators — Import licensing arrangements for textile and clothing products originating in China into the Community — Changes from 1 January 2009

(2008/C 316/06)

By the present notice, Community operators are informed of the following practical issues concerning imports of textile and clothing products originating in China from 1 January 2009.

The current regime of double checking surveillance system of imports for the product categories originating in China listed in Annex V to the Council Regulation (EEC) No 3030/93 of 12 October 1993 on common rules of imports of certain textile products from third countries (1) will expire on 31 December 2008.

1

From 1 January 2009, the release into free circulation of textile and clothing products originating in China will no longer require any import licence or surveillance document regardless of their date of shipment.

---

(1)  OJ L 275, 8.11.1993, p. 1.

1

---
§ 170.001 Applicability. ( a ) This subchapter applies to each vessel that is— ( 1 ) Contracted for on or after March 11, 1996, except where specifically stated otherwise; and
( 2 ) Either— ( i ) Inspected under another subchapter of this chapter, or is a foreign vessel that must comply with the requirements in subchapter O of this chapter; or
( ii ) Required by either subchapter C or subchapter E of this chapter to meet applicable requirements contained in this subchapter.
( b ) Each vessel contracted for before March 11, 1996 may be constructed in accordance with the regulations in effect at the time. However, any alterations or repairs must be done in accordance with § 170.005.
( c ) Certain regulations in this subchapter apply only to limited categories of vessels. Specific applicability statements are provided at the beginning of those regulations.
[CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51010, Nov. 4, 1983, as amended by CGD 89-037, 57 FR 41825, Sept. 11, 1992; CGD 85-080, 61 FR 943, Jan. 10, 1996; USCG-2007-0030, 75 FR 78082, Dec. 14, 2010]
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, AlexFerries, Chief Financial Officer of UAGH, Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)

the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter endedSeptember 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and

(2)

theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

Date:  November 14, 2008

*/s/ Alex Ferries*

Daniel Drummond

Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act hasbeen furnished to UAGH, Inc. and will be retained by UAGH, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
# C_2012006EN.01002801.xml

| 7.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/28

---

Action brought on 27 October 2011 — ZZ v EIB

(Case F-115/11)

2012/C 6/53

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: N. Thieltgen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Investment Bank

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the President of the EIB not to appoint the applicant but another candidate to the post of head of a division within the EIB and a claim for damages.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the President of the EIB not to appoint the applicant to the post of Head of the Risk Policy and Pricing Division within the Credit Risk Directorate of the Risk Management Directorate and not to have awarded him the post of Head of the Risk Policy and Pricing Division within the Credit Risk Directorate of the Risk Management Directorate; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the President of the EIB not to appoint the applicant to the post of Head of the Risk Policy and Pricing Division within the Credit Risk Directorate of the Risk Management Directorate and not to have awarded him the post of Head of the Risk Policy and Pricing Division within the Credit Risk Directorate of the Risk Management Directorate;

| — | direct the EIB to take the necessary measures in order to put in place a lawful procedure for filling the post; |
| --- | --- |

—

direct the EIB to take the necessary measures in order to put in place a lawful procedure for filling the post;

| — | find the EIB liable vis-à-vis the applicant in respect of the unlawfulness of the decision to appoint another candidate to the contested post; |
| --- | --- |

—

find the EIB liable vis-à-vis the applicant in respect of the unlawfulness of the decision to appoint another candidate to the contested post;

| — | order the EIB to pay compensation to make good the material and non-material damage suffered by the applicant, together with default interest:






  — | non-material damage: EUR 50 000; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

order the EIB to pay compensation to make good the material and non-material damage suffered by the applicant, together with default interest:

—

non-material damage: EUR 50 000;

| — | material damage in respect of loss of earnings: EUR 436 100; |
| --- | --- |

—

material damage in respect of loss of earnings: EUR 436 100;

| — | order the EIB to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the EIB to pay the costs.

---
NO. 07-06-0366-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JANUARY 23, 2007

______________________________

CARLOS A.L. VAUGHN, APPELLANT

V.

BRUCE ZELLER, JOE NUNN AND KATHY SKINNER, APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE 320TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 092479-00-D; HONORABLE DON EMERSON, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Carlos A.L. Vaughn filed a notice of appeal from a summary judgment in favor of

appellees. The trial court clerk’s record was filed on November 3, 2006. By letter dated

December 20, 2006, the clerk of this court notified Vaughn that appellant’s brief was due

December 4, 2006, but had yet to be filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a), 38.8. The letter

further advised Vaughn that the appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of

prosecution if the brief, or a response reasonably explaining the failure to file a brief with
2

a showing that appellees had not been injured by the delay, was not filed by January 2,

2007. No brief, motion for extension or other response has been received. 

Accordingly, we now dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and failure to

comply with a directive of the court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(b), (c). 

James T. Campbell

 Justice
§ 171.140 Drainage of a flush deck vessel. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the weather deck on a flush deck vessel must be watertight and have no obstruction to overboard drainage.
( b ) Each vessel with a flush deck may have solid bulwarks in the forward one-third length of the vessel if— ( 1 ) The bulwarks do not form a well enclosed on all sides; and
( 2 ) The foredeck of the vessel has sufficient sheer to ensure drainage aft.
[CGD 85-080, 62 FR 51354, Sept. 30, 1997]
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2361 

To require the accreditation of English language training programs, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2009 

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts (for himself and Mr. SMITH of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the accreditation of English language training 

programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACCREDITATION OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE 

4 TRAINING PROGRAMS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 101(a) of the Immigra6 tion and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)) is amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (15)(F)(i), by striking ‘‘a lan8 guage’’ and inserting ‘‘an accredited language’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following: 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2361 IH

1 ‘‘(52) The term ‘accredited language training pro2 gram’ means a language training program that is accred3 ited by an accrediting agency recognized by the Secretary 

4 of Education.’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para7 graph (2), the amendments made by subsection (a) 

8 shall— 

9 (A) take effect on the date that is 180 

10 days after the date of the enactment of this 

11 Act; and 

12 (B) apply with respect to applications for 

13 a nonimmigrant visa under section 

14 101(a)(15)(F)(i) of the Immigration and Na15 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(F)(i)) that 

16 are filed on or after the effective date described 

17 in subparagraph (A). 

18 (2) TEMPORARY EXCEPTION.— 

19 (A) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding sec20 tion 101(a)(15)(F)(i) of the Immigration and 

21 Nationality Act, as amended by subsection (a), 

22 during the 3-year period beginning on the date 

23 of the enactment of this Act, an alien seeking 

24 to enter the United States to pursue a course 

25 of study at a language training program that 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2361 IH

1 has been certified by the Secretary of Home2 land Security and has not been accredited or 

3 denied accreditation by an entity described in 

4 section 101(a)(52) of such Act may be granted 

5 a nonimmigrant visa under such section 

6 101(a)(15)(F)(i). 

7 (B) ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT.—An 

8 alien may not be granted a nonimmigrant visa 

9 under subparagraph (A) if the sponsoring insti10 tution of the language training program to 

11 which the alien seeks to enroll does not— 

12 (i) submit an application for the ac13 creditation of such program to a regional 

14 or national accrediting agency recognized 

15 by the Secretary of Education within 1 

16 year after the date of the enactment of this 

17 Act; and 

18 (ii) comply with the applicable accred19 iting requirements of such agency. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.171-19 Approval testing for child size immersion suit. A child size suit must pass the following tests: ( a ) The stability test prescribed in § 160.171-17(c)(8), except that only six children need be used as test subjects and they can be of either sex. The subjects must be within the ranges of weight and height prescribed in § 160.171-9(m). The heaviest subject must weigh at least 10 kg (22 lb.) more than the lightest subject. During this test the face seal, neck and chin fit are evaluated and must be comparable to the fit of the corresponding adult size suit on an adult.
( b ) The buoyancy test prescribed in § 160.171-17(g).
( c ) The body strength test prescribed in § 160.171-17(k) except that the cylinders must be 50 mm (2 in.) in diameter and the test weight must be 55 kg (120 lb.).