alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

          - 16 CFR Part 1407 

# AGENCY:

Consumer Product Safety Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

This document corrects Figures 1 and 3 of the final rule requiring manufacturers to label portable generators with performance and technical data related to performance and safety. 

# DATES:

This correction is effective May 14, 2007 and applies to any portable generator manufactured or imported on or after that date. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Timothy P. Smith, Project Manager, Division of Human Factors, Directorate for Engineering Sciences, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland; telephone (301) 504-7691; or e-mail                         *tsmith@cpsc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## The Correction 

                    On January 12, 2007, the Commission issued a final rule requiring manufacturers to label portable generators with performance and technical data related to performance and safety. 72 FR 1443. Figures 1 and 3 of the final rule were incorrect. This notice corrects Figures 1 and 3 so that each reflects the requirements in the text of the final rule. For clarity, while Figure 2 remains unchanged, all three Figures are provided in this correction. Because this correction is a technical correction, notice and comment is unnecessary.[1] 

# List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 1407

      - Consumer protection
      - Labeling

Accordingly, in rule FR Doc. 07-80 published January 12, 2007 (72 FR 1443), correct Figures 1 through 3 to part 1407 as published in 72 FR 1443 to read as follows: 
      ( print page 2185)    

Dated: January 12, 2007. 

Todd Stevenson, 

Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission. 

# Footnotes

1.                             Section 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 07-193 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
#### Francis McLaughlin, *Respondent, v.*George W. Campbell and George A. Thayer, *Appellants*.

Judgment and. order denying new trial reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Gilbert, J.
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.007-7 Analysis of results. ( a ) When only one sample is tested, the results of the test shall be binding and no analysis by the Coast Guard will be undertaken.
( b ) When more than one sample of the same density material is tested simultaneously and the results are not exact, the Coast Guard may analyze the results. Data from the tests may be analyzed to determine the minimum thickness to meet the requirements of § 164.007-5(a).
( c ) Consideration will be given to correction for inaccurate furnace control in accordance with § 164.007-4(d)(4).
[CGFR 69-72, 34 FR 17498, Oct. 29, 1969; 34 FR 19030, Nov. 29, 1969]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MICHAEL MILES, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SYBRA, LLC, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 14-CV-14673 

Hon. Laurie J. Michelson 

Magistrate Judge Mona Majzoub 

STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff and Defendant, through 

their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that this action shall be dismissed with 

prejudice, with each party to bear his or its own costs and attorneys’ fees, except as 

specified to the contrary in the parties’ written settlement agreement resolving this 

matter. The parties respectfully request that the Court retain jurisdiction over this 

action for the limited purpose of enforcing the terms of the written settlement 

agreement. 

 

Case 2:14-cv-14673-LJM-MKM ECF No. 6, PageID.19 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 2
 2 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED with 

PREJUDICE and the Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action for the limited 

purpose of enforcing the terms of the written settlement agreement. 

SO ORDERED. 

s/Laurie J. Michelson 

LAURIE J. MICHELSON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: February 12, 2015 

Agreed as to form and content. 

/s/ Owen B. Dunn, Jr. (w/consent) /s/James F. Hermon 

Owen B. Dunn, Jr. James F. Hermon 

Counsel for Plaintiff Counsel for Defendant 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing document was served on the 

attorneys and/or parties of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on February 12, 2015. 

 s/Jane Johnson 

Case Manager to 

 Honorable Laurie J. Michelson 

Case 2:14-cv-14673-LJM-MKM ECF No. 6, PageID.20 Filed 02/12/15 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6505

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM TIMOTHY KEMPH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, 

District Judge. (2:06-cr-00159-AWA-JEB-1)

Submitted: July 28, 2016 Decided: August 2, 2016

Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Timothy Kemph, Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott 

Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

William Timothy Kemph appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Kemph, 

No. 2:06-cr-00159-AWA-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 21, 2016 &

entered Mar. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 670.9 Antarctic Conservation Act enforcement exception.

Paragraphs (a) through (d) of § 670.4 shall not apply to acts carried out by an Antarctic Conservation Act Enforcement Officer (designated pursuant to 45 CFR 672.3) if undertaken as part of the Antarctic Conservation Act Enforcement Officer's official duties.
Exhibit 4.2

 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated June 26, 2020, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2022 contained in Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-237230) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned
report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.




	 	/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP






 


Chicago, Illinois


June 26, 2020
#### George A. Coe, Respondent, *v.*David Bearup, *Appellant*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 77 (Monday, April 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20176]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1981]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Departmental Offices; Renewal of the Treasury Borrowing Advisory 
Committee of the Bond Market Association and Name Change to the 
Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee of the Securities Industry and 
Financial Markets Association

ACTION: Notice of renewal and name change.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. 2), with the concurrence of the 
General Services Administration, the Secretary of the Treasury has 
determined that renewal of the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee of 
The Bond Market Association (the ``Committee'') is necessary and in the 
public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on 
the Department of the Treasury by law.
    Effective November 1, 2006, the name of the Bond Market Association 
was changed to the Securities Industry and Financial Markets 
Association following the merger of the Securities Industry Association 
and the Bond Market Association. Hence, the name of the Committee has 
been changed to reflect this merger. The new name is the Treasury 
Borrowing Advisory Committee of the Securities Industry and Financial 
Markets Association.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karthik Ramanathan, Director, Office 
of Debt Management (202) 622-2042.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the Committee is to provide 
informed advice as representatives of the financial community to the 
Secretary of the Treasury and Treasury staff, upon the Secretary of the 
Treasury's request, in carrying out Treasury responsibilities for 
federal financing and public debt management.
    The Committee meets to consider special items on which its advice 
is sought pertaining to immediate Treasury funding requirements and 
pertaining to longer term approaches to manage the national debt in a 
cost-effective manner. The Committee usually meets immediately before 
the Treasury announces each mid-calendar quarter funding operation, 
although special meetings also may be held.
    Membership consists of 10-15 individuals who are experts in the 
government securities market and who are involved in senior positions 
in debt markets as institutional investors, investment advisors, or as 
dealers in government securities.
    The Designated Federal Official for the Advisory Committee is the 
Director of the Office of Debt Management. The Treasury Department is 
filing copies of the Committee's renewal charter with appropriate 
committees in Congress.

    Dated: April 17, 2007.
Anthony W. Ryan,
Assistant Secretary, Financial Markets.
[FR Doc. 07-1981 Filed 4-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4811-42-M
#### Alfred Stout and others, *Respondents, v.*Lewis M. Smith, *Appellant*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40669

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAMIRO GARCIA-CARDENAS

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:07-CR-989-ALL

Before KING, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ramiro Garcia-Cardenas (Garcia) appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction for being found in the United States unlawfully

following deportation and for possession with intent to distribute marijuana.

The district court sentenced Garcia to 60 months of imprisonment and four years

of supervised release but did not specify whether this sentence applied to both

offenses for which he was convicted.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 2, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-40669

2

Garcia argues that the district court’s sentence is an improper general

sentence and that the term of supervised release imposed for his illegal reentry

offense exceeded the statutory maximum of three years. See Benson v. United

States, 332 F.2d 288 (5th Cir. 1964); 18 U.S.C. § 3583(b)(2). The Government

contends that the district court’s sentence is proper because it imposed a fouryear term of supervised release for the drug offense and did not impose any term

of supervised release for the illegal reentry offense. Alternatively, the

Government argues that any error did not effect Garcia’s substantial rights.

Because the district court’s judgment is unclear and the imposition of a

sentence exceeding the statutory maximum is an illegal sentence and constitutes

plain error, see United States v. Sias, 227 F.3d 244, 246 (5th Cir. 2000), we order

a LIMITED REMAND to the district court to clarify the sentence imposed as to

each count of conviction. Once the district court issues such clarification, the

case shall be returned to this court for further proceedings. This court retains

jurisdiction over this case for all other purposes.
§ 142.325 Fire pumps, fire mains, and fire hoses. Each towing vessel must have either a self-priming, power-driven, fixed fire pump, a fire main, and hoses and nozzles in accordance with paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section; or a portable pump, and hoses and nozzles, in accordance with paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section. ( a ) A fixed fire pump must be capable of: ( 1 ) Delivering water simultaneously from the two highest hydrants, or from both branches of the fitting if the highest hydrant has a Siamese fitting, at a pitot-tube pressure of at least 344 kilopascals (kPa) (50 pounds per square inch (psi)), and a flow rate of at least 300 liters per minute (lpm) (80 gallons per minute (gpm)); and
( 2 ) Being energized remotely from a safe place outside the engine room and at the pump.
( b ) All suction valves necessary for the operation of the fire main must be kept in the open position or capable of operation from the same place where the remote fire pump control is located.
( c ) The fire main must have a sufficient number of fire hydrants with attached hose to allow a stream of water to reach any part of the machinery space using a single length of fire hose.
( d ) The hose must be a lined commercial fire hose 15 meters (50 feet) in length, at least 40 millimeters (1.5 inches) in diameter, and fitted with a nozzle made of corrosion-resistant material capable of providing a solid stream and a spray pattern.
( e ) The portable fire pump must be self-priming and power-driven, with: ( 1 ) A minimum capacity of at least 300 LPM (80 gpm) at a discharge gauge pressure of not less than 414 kPa (60 psi), measured at the pump discharge;
( 2 ) A sufficient amount of lined commercial fire hose 15 meters (50 feet) in length, at least 40 mm (1.5 inches) in diameter and immediately available to attach to it so that a stream of water will reach any part of the vessel; and
( 3 ) A nozzle made of corrosion-resistant material capable of providing a solid stream and a spray pattern.
( f ) The pump must be stowed with its hose and nozzle outside of the machinery space.
# C_2014421EN.01004602.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/46

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 10 July 2014 — CG v EIB

(Case F-103/11) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Staff of the EIB - Psychological harassment - Inquiry procedure - Decision of the President not to act on a complaint - Opinion of the committee of inquiry - Incorrect definition of psychological harassment - Intentional nature of the conduct - Finding of conduct and symptoms constituting psychological harassment - Search for the causal link - Absence - Inconsistency of the opinion of the committee of inquiry - Manifest error of assessment - Maladministration - Obligation of confidentiality - Protection of personal data - Action for compensation))

2014/C 421/64

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CG (represented initially by: N. Thieltgen, and subsequently by: J.-N. Louis and D. de Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: EIB (represented by: G. Nuvoli and T. Gilliams, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the form of order sought by the applicant: European Data Protection Supervisor (represented initially by: I. Chatelier and H. Kranenborg, and subsequently by: I. Chatelier and A. Buchta, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the form of order sought by the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the President of the EIB not to take any action following the inquiry concerning alleged psychological harassment and to annul the final conclusion of the committee of inquiry and claim for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the President of the European Investment Bank of 27 July 2011; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the President of the European Investment Bank of 27 July 2011;

| 2. | Orders the European Investment Bank to pay CG the sum of EUR 35  000; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Investment Bank to pay CG the sum of EUR 35  000;

| 3. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 4. | Orders the European Investment Bank to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by CG; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Investment Bank to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by CG;

| 5. | Orders the European Data Protection Supervisor, intervener, to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders the European Data Protection Supervisor, intervener, to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 7.1.2012, p. 25.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Premier Farnell plc (the "Company") on
Form 20-F for the year ended February 1, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such
officer's knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
            Report.

Date: May 13, 2004

                                           /s/ JOHN R. HIRST
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John R. Hirst
                                           Chief Executive (principal executive
                                           officer)

                                           /s/ ANDREW C. FISHER
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Andrew C. Fisher
                                           Finance Director (principal financial
                                           officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Premier Farnell plc and will be retained by Premier Farnell plc and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Lewis C. Wilson, *Appellant, v.*James Gordon Bennett, *Respon*dent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Brady, J.
§ 140.500 General. ( a ) No later than July 22, 2019, the owner or managing operator must implement a health and safety plan. The health and safety plan must document compliance with this part and include recordkeeping procedures.
( b ) The owner, managing operator, or master must ensure that all persons on board a towing vessel comply with the health and safety plan.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

VERSATA SOFTWARE, INC. et al., 

 Plaintiffs, Case No. 15-cv-10628 

 (consolidated with Case No. 15-11264) 

v. Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED PENDING MOTIONS 

 Based on the stipulation of the parties (see ECF No. 1117), and for the reasons 

stated in the motions, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the unopposed motions 

pending at docket numbers 1081, 1084, 1087, 1110, and 1112 are GRANTED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: November 15, 2023 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on November 15, 2023, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Ryan 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5126 

Case 2:15-cv-10628-MFL-EAS ECF No. 1120, PageID.96746 Filed 11/15/23 Page 1 of 1
# C_2019044EN.01005001.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/50

---

Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — Treofan Holdings and Treofan Germany v Commission

(Case T-612/11) (1)

((State aid - German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying losses forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market - Annulment of the contested measure by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2019/C 44/63)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Treofan Holdings GmbH (Raunheim, Germany), Treofan Germany GmbH & Co. KG (Neunkirchen, Germany) (represented by: J de Weerth, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Adam, then, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially T. Henze, K. Petersen and R. Kanitz, then, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and K. Stranz and finally, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and S. Eisenberg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel) (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 26).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

| 2. | The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by Treofan Holdings GmbH and Treofan Germany GmbH & Co. KG; |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by Treofan Holdings GmbH and Treofan Germany GmbH & Co. KG;

| 3. | The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.

---