alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,644
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   585
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     17,796
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         30,290
<ALLOWANCE>                                        208
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,339
<DEPOSITS>                                      47,862
<SHORT-TERM>                                       115
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                294
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,193
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,875
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  54,339
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,088
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  733
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    85
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,907
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,109
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,109
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,797
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      115
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,067
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    592
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         592
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       472
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .89
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.11
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                        45
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   300
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    (269)
<RECOVERIES>                                        62
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  208
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               208
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            208


</TABLE>
# C_2013026EN.01004602.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/46

---

Order of the General Court of 19 October 2012 — Ellinika Nafpigeia and Hoern v Commission

(Case T-466/11) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - State aid - Shipbuilding - Aid granted by the Greek authorities to a shipyard - Measures implementing the Commission’s decision finding that the aid is incompatible with the common market and ordering that it be repaid - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 26/91

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Ellinika Nafpigeia AE (Skaramagka, Greece), and 2. Hoern Beteiligungs GmbH (Kiel, Germany) (represented by: K Chrysogonos and A. Mitsis, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and M. Konstantinidis, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission letter C(2010) 8274 final of 1 December 2010 relating to ‘State aid case CR 16/2004 — Implementation of the negative Decision with recovery concerning State aid in favour of [the company Ellinika Nafpigeia AE] — Invocation by Greece of Article 346 paragraph 1 (b) TFEU and proceedings under Article 348 paragraph 1 TFEU’, as supplemented by the documents and other material on the file of which the applicants became partially aware in June 2011.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no need to adjudicate on the application by Nafpigikes kai viomichanikes epicheiriseis Elefsinas for leave to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to adjudicate on the application by Nafpigikes kai viomichanikes epicheiriseis Elefsinas for leave to intervene.

| 3. | Ellinika Nafpigeia AE and 2. Hoern Beteiligungs GmbH shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Ellinika Nafpigeia AE and 2. Hoern Beteiligungs GmbH shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

| 4. | The applicant for leave to intervene, Nafpigikes kai viomichanikes epicheiriseis Elefsinas, shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The applicant for leave to intervene, Nafpigikes kai viomichanikes epicheiriseis Elefsinas, shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 331, 12.11.2011.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2013 (the "Form 10-Q") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").



I, Heather D. Brolick, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Issuer, certify that to my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 13, 2013



| | /s/ Heather D. Brolick               
| | -------------------------------------
| | Heather D. Brolick                   
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2012089EN.01002102.xml

| 24.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2012 — Verenigde Douaneagenten v Commission

(Case T-32/11) (1)

1

(Customs union - Imports of raw cane sugar from the Netherlands Antilles - Post-clearance recovery of import duties - Request for remission of import duties - Article 220(2)(b) and Article 239 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 - Infringement of essential procedural requirements)

2012/C 89/34

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Verenigde Douaneagenten BV (Rotterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: J. van der Meché and S. Moolenaar, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Bouyon and B. Burggraaf, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 6754 final of 1 October 2010 finding that there should be post-clearance recovery of import duties and that remission of those duties is not justified in a particular case (REC 02/09).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2010) 6754 final of 1 October 2010 in so far as it determines that the remission of import duties in the sum of EUR 531 985,59, pursuant to Article 239 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, is not justified; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2010) 6754 final of 1 October 2010 in so far as it determines that the remission of import duties in the sum of EUR 531 985,59, pursuant to Article 239 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, is not justified;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 103, 2.4.2011.

1

---
----

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with the Annual Reportof Golden Elephant Glass Technology, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"),on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Hong Tan, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to her knowledge: 

(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

April 15, 2009 

/S/ HONG TAN                                                                    **Hong Tan Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)**

[A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Golden Elephant Glass Technology, Inc. and willbe retained by Golden Elephant Glass Technology, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.] 

----
# C_2008188EN.01000401.xml

| 25.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 188/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 188/4

---

Legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

(2008/C 188/02)

| Document | Part | Date | Title |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| COM(2008) 372 | | 19.6.2008 | Proposal for a Council Decision on a Community position within the EU/Mexico Joint Council concerning the amendments to the Joint Council Decision No 2/2001 |
| COM(2008) 374 | | 19.6.2008 | Proposal for a Council Decision on a Community position within the EU/Mexico Joint Council concerning the amendments to the Joint Council Decision No 2/2000, as amended by Joint Council Decision No 3/2004 of 29 July 2004 |

Document

Part

Date

Title

COM(2008) 372

19.6.2008

Proposal for a Council Decision on a Community position within the EU/Mexico Joint Council concerning the amendments to the Joint Council Decision No 2/2001

COM(2008) 374

19.6.2008

Proposal for a Council Decision on a Community position within the EU/Mexico Joint Council concerning the amendments to the Joint Council Decision No 2/2000, as amended by Joint Council Decision No 3/2004 of 29 July 2004

These texts are available on EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

Dated: January 12, 2007.

Vicky D'Onofrio,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-185 Filed 1-12-07; 2:04 pm]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
§ 172.170 Damage stability calculations. ( a ) Each tankship must be shown by design calculations to meet the survival conditions in § 172.195 in each condition of loading and operation assuming the damage specified in § 172.175 for the hull type specified in Table 4 of part 154 of this chapter.
( b ) If a cargo listed in Table 4 of part 154 of this chapter is to be carried, the vessel must be at least the ship type specified in Table 4 of part 154 of this chapter for the cargo.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LOUIS AGOSTON,

Plaintiff, Case No. 14-14013

v. District Judge John Corbett O’Meara

Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,

INC., ET AL.,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER

On July 17, 2015, the Court entered a stipulated order dismissing Defendant

Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”). Therefore, Experian’s motion

to compel Plaintiff’s deposition [Doc. #38], which has been referred for hearing

and determination pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/R. Steven Whalen 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Date: August 12, 2015

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the

parties and/or counsel of record on August 12, 2015, by electronic means and/or

ordinary mail.

s/H. Monda in the absence of C. Ciesla

Case Manager

5:14-cv-14013-JCO-RSW Doc # 42 Filed 08/12/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 316
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.655 Stress relief for independent tanks type C. For a design temperature colder than −10 °C (14 °F), an independent tank type C of: ( a ) Carbon and carbon-manganese steel must be stress relieved by post-weld heat treatment under § 54.25-7 of this chapter or by mechanical stress relief under subpart 54.30 of this chapter; or
( b ) Materials other than carbon and carbon manganese steel must be stress relieved as required under part 54 of this chapter. The procedure for stress relieving must be specially approved by the Commandant (CG-OES).
Regular Totals (Operators)

Airport = JFK

Season = S

Operator = 0001(Exclude)

Status Date = 01/01/2010 (Current & Future)

12/21/2010 08:10:25

Query Parameters:
12/21/2010 08:10:25

Carrier

Regular Totals (Operators)

Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded Excludes FAA Held

JFK Season = SUMMER

PF7 Status Date = 01/01/2010 (Current & Future)

JFK

AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 127 

AAR ASIANA AIRLINES 1 

AEA AIR EUROPA 2 

AEW AEROSVIT AIRLINES 2 

AFL AEROFLOT 2 

AFR AIR FRANCE 7 

AIC AIR INDIA 7 

AJM AIR JAMAICA 6 

AMX AEROMEXICO 6 

ANA ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS 2 

AUA AUSTRIAN 2 

AVA AVIANCA 3 

AVI L'AVION/OPENSKIES 5 

AZA ALITALIA 6 

BAW BRITISH AIRWAYS 15 

BWA CARIBBEAN AIRLINES 5 

CAY CAYMAN AIRWAYS 2 

CCA AIR CHINA 3 

CES CHINA EASTERN AIRLINES 1 

CHQ CHAUTAUQUA 4 

CMP COPA AIRLINES 1 

COA CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 1 

COM COMAIR AIRLINES 146 

CPA CATHAY PACIFIC 6 

CPZ COMPASS AIRLINES 4 

DAL DELTA AIR LINES 248 

DHL DHL 4 

DLH DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA 6 

EGF AMR EAGLE HOLDING COPR. (FORMERLY 61 

EIN AER LINGUS 6 

ELY EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES 3 

ETD ETIHAD 2 

FDX FED EX 3 

FIN FINNAIR 2 

IBE IBERIA AIRWAYS 4 

ICE ICELANDAIR 2 

JAI JET AIRWAYS 2 

JAL JAPAN AIR LINES 2 

JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 363 

KAC KUWAIT AIRWAYS 1 

KAL KOREAN AIR 3 

KLM KLM ROYAL DUTCH 4 

LNE LAN ECUADOR 2 

LOT LOT - POLISH AIRLINES 4 

MSR EGYPT AIR 2 

MXA MEXICANA DE AVIACION 7 

NWA NORTHWEST AIRLINES 14 

QFA QANTAS AIRLINES 2 

QTR QATAR AIRWAYS 3 

RAM ROYAL AIR MAROC 2 

RPA REPUBLIC AIRLINES 3 

Page 2
12/21/2010 08:10:25

Carrier

Regular Totals (Operators)

Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded Excludes FAA Held

JFK Season = SUMMER

PF7 Status Date = 01/01/2010 (Current & Future)

JFK

SAA SOUTH AFRICAN AIRWAYS 2 

SCX SUN COUNTRY AIRLINES, INC. 4 

SIA SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED 2 

SWR SWISS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES (SWISSAIR 6 

TAI TACA AIRLINES 2 

TAM TAM BRAZILIAN AIRLINES 3 

TCF SHUTTLE AMERICA 6 

THY TURKISH AIRLINES, INC. 2 

UAE EMIRATES 4 

UAL UNITED AIRLINES 31 

UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 1 

USA US AIRWAYS 9 

VIR VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIR 7 

VRD VIRGIN AMERICA 17 

Page 3
§ 109.323 Manning of survival craft and supervision. ( a ) There must be a sufficient number of trained persons on board the survival craft for mustering and assisting untrained persons.
( b ) There must be a sufficient number of deck officers, able seamen, or certificated persons on board to operate the survival craft and launching arrangements required for abandonment by the total number of persons on board.
( c ) There must be one person placed in charge of each survival craft to be used. The person in charge must— ( 1 ) Be a deck officer, able seaman, or certificated person. The OCMI, considering the number of persons permitted on board, and the characteristics of the unit, may permit persons practiced in the handling and operation of liferafts or inflatable buoyant apparatus to be placed in charge of liferafts or inflatable buoyant apparatus;
( 2 ) Have another person designated second-in-command of each lifeboat permitted to carry more than 40 persons. This person should be a deck officer, able seaman, or certificated person; and
( 3 ) Have a list of the survival craft crew and must see that the crewmembers are acquainted with their duties. The second-in-command of a lifeboat must also have a list of the lifeboat crew.
( d ) There must be a person assigned to each motorized survival craft who is capable of operating the engine and carrying out minor adjustments.
( e ) The person in charge must make sure that the persons required under paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section are equitably distributed among the unit's survival craft.
[CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25302, May 20, 1996]
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.027-2 Type. ( a ) Each life float must meet the requirements in subpart 160.010 of this chapter for a peripheral body type buoyant apparatus designed so that persons supported are only partially immersed (180 N (40 lb.) of buoyancy per person required).
( b ) [Reserved]
**EXHIBIT ITEM 31.1**

 

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

 

I,Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr. certify that:

 

1.         I have read this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Northern CaliforniaBancorp, Inc.;

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4.         The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;

 

b)             evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period (the “EvaluationDate”); and

 

c)              presented in this annual report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.         The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee or registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

a)              all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and

 

b)             any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and

 

 
| Date: March 23, 2006 | /s/ Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr. |   |
|----------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                 | Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr.     |
|                 | Chairman of the Board &     |
|                 | Chief Executive Officer         |

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 153

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 153.501 Requirement for dry inert gas.

When Table 1 refers to this section, an inert gas system for the containment system must supply inert gas containing no more than 100 ppm water.