alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 108.525 Survival craft number and arrangement. ( a ) Each unit must carry the following: ( 1 ) Lifeboats installed in at least two widely separated locations on different sides or ends of the unit. The arrangement of the lifeboats must provide sufficient capacity to accommodate the total number of persons permitted on board if— ( i ) All the lifeboats in any one location are lost or rendered unusable; or
( ii ) All the lifeboats on any one side or end of the unit are lost or rendered unusable.
( 2 ) Liferafts arranged for float-free launching and having an aggregate capacity that will accommodate the total number of persons permitted on board.
( b ) In the case of a self-elevating unit where, due to its size or configuration, lifeboats can not be located in the widely separated locations required under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the OCMI may accept the following number and arrangement of survival craft: ( 1 ) Lifeboats with an aggregate capacity to accommodate the total number of persons permitted on board.
( 2 ) Liferafts served by launching appliances or marine evacuation systems of an aggregate capacity to accommodate the total number of persons permitted on board. These liferafts may be the float-free liferafts under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, or liferafts in addition to the float-free liferafts.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RICHARD KALLA, and

FIRST MONETARY GROUP,

Plaintiffs,

CASE NO. 14-CV-13930

v. HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH

DR. ROGER STANMORE,

METRO REALTY PARTNERS, LLC,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER RECOGNIZING BANKRUPTCY STAY AS TO DEBTOR-DEFENDANT

On November 17, 2014, defendant-debtor Roger Stanmore notified the court that

he has filed a Chapter 11 petition with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern

District of Alabama. The Bankruptcy Code imposes an automatic stay as to the debtordefendant, to protect such debtor from judicial action to recover a claim against it that arose

before the commencement of the bankruptcy case. 11 U.S.C. § 362(a).

IT IS ORDERED that the bankruptcy stay prevents further prosecution of the abovecaptioned case against defendant Stanmore only.

Dated: November 25, 2014

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

November 25, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and

also on debtor-defendant Roger Stanmore’s attorney Kevin

Heard at kheard@heardlaw.com.

s/Marcia Beauchemin

Deputy Clerk

2:14-cv-13930-GCS-MKM Doc # 7 Filed 11/25/14 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 28
Gila River Indian Community 

Department of Environmental Quality 

Air Program 

P.O. Box 97 Sacaton, Az. 85247 

Phone: (520) 562-2234 Fax: (520) 562-2245 

FAX TRANSMISSION 

From: SciM-Qf Tmv\s 

Date: 5 - qa& 

Re: b 17-0 COMW&+ WkJ 

Pages (including this page): 

cc: 

COMMENTS: 
GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

AIR PROGW 

MEMO 

DATE: May 27,2005 

TO: Mr. Danny French 

FROM: Janet Travis, Environmental Project Assoc 

RE: District 7 Community Meeting 

The GRIC Department of Environmental Quality is requesting placement on the agenda 

for the 6/20f05 Community meeting. The air program would like to present information 

on proposed ordinances that will regulate sources of air pollution withn the Community. 

We are particularly interested in comments on open burning. 

Please call me at 520-562-2234 ext. 286 if you have any questions. 
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT 

TIME : 05/27/2005 14:54 

NAME : DEPT DEQ 

FAX : 5205622245 

TEL : 5205622234 

DATE, TIME 

FAX NO. /NAME 

DURATION 

PAGE (S) RESULT 

MODE 

05/27 14:53 

15204303224 

00: 00: 26 

0 2 

OK 

STANDARD 

ECM 

Gdie River Indian Comaucnity 

Department of Environmental Quality 

Air Proprn 

P.O. Box 97 - Sacaton, Az. - 85247 

Phone: (520) 562-2234 Fax: (520) 562-2245 

FIX TRANSMISSION 

Dste: '&zy-= 

ne: G~[ZO G~~mui4-y ~5- 

Pages (including this page): ;3, 

cc:
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.8 Procedures for requesting an endorsed Certificate of Inspection. ( a ) When applying for the endorsed Certificate of Inspection that § 153.900 requires for a ship to carry a cargo listed in Table 1, the applicant must proceed as follows: ( 1 ) Send a letter to one of the Coast Guard offices listed in § 91.55-15 of this chapter that includes— ( i ) A request for the endorsed Certificate of Inspection;
( ii ) The name of the ship; and
( iii ) A list of the cargoes from Table 1 the applicant wishes the endorsement to allow.
( 2 ) Supply to the Coast Guard when requested— ( i ) Hull type calculations;
( ii ) The plans and information listed in §§ 54.01-18, 56.01-10, 91.55-5 (a), (b), (d), (g), and (h), and 110.25-1 of this chapter;
( iii ) A copy of the Procedures and Arrangements Manual required by § 153.490; and
( iv ) Any other ship information, including plans, design calculations, test results, certificates, and manufacturer's data, that the Coast Guard needs to determine if the ship meets this part.
( b ) The Coast Guard notifies the applicant in writing— ( 1 ) Whether any further information is necessary to evaluate the request for the endorsed Certificate of Inspection; and
( 2 ) Of the outcome of the request for the endorsed Certificate of Inspection.
( c ) The Coast Guard returns the Procedures and Arrangements Manual stamped “Approved” or indicating what corrections are necessary.
Note:
The procedures for requesting an IOPP Certificate are found in 33 CFR Part 151.
[CGD 81-101, 52 FR 7779, Mar. 12, 1987]
# C_2014071EN.01003001.xml

| 8.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/30

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 16 September 2013 — Faita v EESC

(Case F-92/11) (1)

(Civil service - Psychological harassment - Request for assistance - Grounds of a decision)

(2014/C 71/56)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Carla Faita (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) (represented by: M. Arsène and L. Camarena Januzec, acting as Agents, and by M. Troncoso Ferrer and F.-M. Hislaire, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the Economic and Social Committee refusing the applicant’s request for acknowledgement that she was the victim of misconduct, as a result of lack of assistance and a breach of the duty of care, and for measures to be taken in order to establish publicly the applicant’s merits and abilities, and a claim for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms Faita to bear her costs and to pay three-quarters of the costs incurred by the European Economic and Social Committee; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Faita to bear her costs and to pay three-quarters of the costs incurred by the European Economic and Social Committee;

| 3. | Orders the European Economic and Social Committee to bear one quarter of its costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Economic and Social Committee to bear one quarter of its costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 26.11.2011 p. 46.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BRIANNA JEFFERSON,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 14-13749

vs. Paul D. Borman

United States District Judge

UNITED CAR COMPANY, INC.,

Defendant.

_______________________________________/

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT

AGAINST UNITED CAR COMPANY, INC. (ECF NO. 18)

 This action arises from Plaintiff’s allegations that Defendant United Car Company, Inc.

violated the federal Truth-in-Lending-Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1601, et seq. (“TILA”) through its

practice of using “Purchase Spot Delivery Agreements”. Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint was

filed on behalf herself and on behalf of a putative class. (ECF No. 6). Defendant has failed to

defend or otherwise appear in this action and Plaintiff now moves this Court for entry of a

Default Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2). (ECF No. 18). As the

class has never been certified, Plaintiff has moved for an entry of default judgment only as to her

own claims. 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b) a judgment by default may be entered

against a defendant who has failed to plead or otherwise defend against an action. However, in

order to obtain judgment by default, the proponent must first request the clerk’s entry of default

pursuant to Rule 55(a). See In re Loeb, No. 06-13743, 2006 WL 3104598, at * 2 (E.D. Mich.

Oct. 31, 2006) (“[A] plain reading of Rule 55 demonstrates that entry of default by the clerk is a

2:14-cv-13749-PDB-MKM Doc # 22 Filed 10/30/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 119
prerequisite to an entry of default judgment.” (quoting Vongrabe v. Sprint PCS, 312 F. Supp. 2d

1313, 1318 (S.D. Cal. 2004))); Hanner v. City of Dearborn Heights, No. 07-15251, 2008 WL

2744860, at *1 (E.D. Mich. July 14, 2008) (finding same); see also 10A Charles Alan Wright,

Arthur R. Miller & Mary Kay Kane, Federal Practice & Procedure, § 2685 (3d ed. 2015) (“Prior

to obtaining a default judgment under either Rule 55(b)(1) or Rule 55(b)(2), there must be an

entry of default as provided by Rule 55(a).”)

In the instant case, Plaintiff previously filed a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment

which the Court denied finding Defendant had not been properly served. (ECF No. 16). In that

Opinion and Order, the Court explicitly set aside the previous clerk’s entry of default. (Id.). 

Plaintiff has now filed a renewed Motion for Entry of Default Judgment but has failed to request

or receive a clerk’s entry of default pursuant to Rule 55(a). Therefore, Plaintiff’s renewed

Motion for Entry of Default Judgment is procedurally improper and must be DENIED at this

time. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

s/Paul D. Borman 

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: October 30, 2015

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or

party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on October 30, 2015.

s/Deborah Tofil 

Case Manager

2

2:14-cv-13749-PDB-MKM Doc # 22 Filed 10/30/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 120
Editorial Note on Part 162
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 162.027-3 Design, construction, testing, and marking requirements. ( a ) Each combination solid stream and water spray firehose nozzle required to be approved under the provisions of this subpart must be of brass or bronze, except for hardware and other incidental parts, which may be of rubber, plastic, or stainless steel, and designed, constructed, tested, and marked in accordance with the requirements of ASTM F 1546 or NFPA 1964 (incorporated by reference, see § 162.027-2).
( b ) All inspections and tests required by ASTM F 1546 or NFPA 1964 must be performed by an independent laboratory accepted by the Coast Guard under subpart 159.010 of this chapter. A list of independent laboratories accepted by the Coast Guard as meeting subpart 159.010 of this chapter may be obtained by contacting the Commandant (CG-ENG-4).
( c ) The independent laboratory must prepare a report on the results of the testing and must furnish the manufacturer with a copy of the test report upon completion of the testing required by ASTM F 1546 or NFPA 1964.
[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48277, July 22, 2016]
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Belcrest Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge: (a)
     the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(b)
     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period. Date: November 5, 2010 /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.Thomas E. Faust Jr.Chief Executive Officer
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Subsidiaries of the Company
 Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction of IncorporationJDA Software Group, Inc.
    
    DelawareJDA Software, Inc.
    
    ArizonaJDA Worldwide, Inc.
    
    ArizonaJDA Software Services, Inc.
    
    DelawareManugistics, Inc.
    
    DelawareManugistics Holdings Delaware II, Inc.
    
    Delawarei2 Technologies, Inc.
    
    Delawarei2 Technologies International Services, Inc.
    
    DelawareFreightMatrix.com, Inc.
    
    DelawareJDA Technologies US, Inc.
    
    NevadaJDA Software Australia Pty Ltd
    
    AustraliaManugistics Australia PTY Limited
    
    Australiai2 Technologies Pty Ltd.
    
    AustraliaJDA Technologies N.V.
    
    BelgiumManugistics Benelux
    
    BelgiumJDA Solutions DO Brasil Ltda
    
    BrazilJDA Software Canada Ltd.
    
    CanadaBeijing JDA Technologies Company Ltd.
    
    ChinaJDA Chile S.A.
    
    ChileJDA International Limited
    
    England & WalesJDA Technologies Finland Oy Ltd.
    
    FinlandJDA Software France S.A.
    
    FranceManugistics Deutschland GmbH
    
    Germanyi2 Technologies, GmbH
    
    GermanyJDA Software Hong Kong Limited
    
    Hong KongJDA Hong Kong Limited
    
    Hong KongJDA Software India Private Limited
    
    Indiai2 Technologies India Private Limited
    
    IndiaJDA Software Italy S.r.L.
    
    ItalyJDA Software Japan Co. Ltd.
    
    JapanJDA Software Korea, Ltd.
    
    KoreaJDA Software Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.
    
    MalaysiaManu Solutions Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.
    
    MalaysiaJDA Software de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoJDA Servicios Profesionales, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoJDA Software Benelux B.V.
    
    NetherlandsJDA Netherlands C.V.
    
    NetherlandsStanley International Holding C.V.
    
    NetherlandsJDA Technologies (Netherlands) B.V.
    
    NetherlandsJDA Software Norway AS
    
    NorwayJDA Software Shanghai Co. Ltd.
    
    ShanghaiJDA Asia Pte. Ltd.
    
    SingaporeJDA Software Asia Pte. Ltd.
    
    Singaporei2 Technologies PTE Ltd.
    
    SingaporeJDA Software South Africa (Proprietary) Limited
    
    South AfricaScheduling Technology Group SouthAfrica (PTY) Limited
    
    South AfricaMStar SA (Pty) Ltd.
    
    South Africa




---



##### 



Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction of IncorporationJDA Incorporated Software Solutions, S.A.
    
    SpainJDA Software Nordic AB
    
    Swedeni2 Technologies Taiwan, Inc.
    
    Taiwani2 Technologies Limited
    
    United Kingdom
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.077-4 Type. ( a ) A hybrid PFD that successfully passes all applicable tests may be approved as a Type I, II, III, or V for various size ranges of persons weighing over 23 kg (50 lb), as Type I or II for persons weighing 14-23 kg (30-50 lb) or as Type I or II for other sizes. A Type V PFD has limitations on its approval.
( b ) The approval tests in this subpart require each Type V hybrid PFD to have at least the same performance as a Type I, II, or III PFD for adult and youth sizes or Type I or II PFD for child sizes.
( c ) A hybrid PFD may be approved for use on recreational boats, commercial vessels or both if the applicable requirements are met.
[CGD 78-174, 60 FR 2486, Jan. 9, 1995]
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-21-00200-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF

E.J.G., Z.M.G., AND M.B.G., CHILDREN

From the 13th District Court

Navarro County, Texas

Trial Court No. D18-27516-CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal. The Court grants the motion, and 

this appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Dismissal of this appeal does not 

prevent a party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. Id.

MATT JOHNSON

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and

Justice Rose1

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed August 26, 2021

1 The Honorable Jeff Rose, Former Chief Justice of the Third Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment of the 

Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 74.003, 75.002, 75.003.
In the Interest of E.J.G., Z.M.G., and M.B.G. Page 2

[CV06]
<PAGE>
Page 7                                               Exhibit 99.1






                  FORM OF ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE
                  -------------------------------------

                   (To be delivered on or before each
                 March 31 beginning with March 31, 1997,
               pursuant to Section 3.5 of the Pooling and 
                 Servicing Agreement referred to below)


                          FIRST OMNI BANK, N.A.
                                    
                FIRST OMNI BANK CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST

     The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of First
Omni Bank, N.A., as Servicer ("First Omni"), pursuant to the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 1996 (as may
be amended and supplemented from time to time, the "Agreement"),
among First Omni Bank, N.A., as Transferor and Servicer, and The
Bank of New York, as Trustee, does hereby certify that:

     1.  First Omni is, as of the date hereof, Servicer under the
Agreement.  Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their
respective meanings as set forth in the Agreement.

     2.  The undersigned is a Servicing Officer who is duly
authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this
Certificate to Trustee.

     3.  A review of the activities of Servicer during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1996, and of its performance under the
Agreement was conducted under my supervision.

     4.  Based on such review, Servicer has, to the best of my
knowledge, performed in all material respects its obligations
under the Agreement throughout such year and no default in the
performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing
except as set forth in paragraph 5.

     5.  The following is a description of each default in the
performance of Servicer's obligations under the provisions of the
Agreement known to me to have been made by Servicer during the
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
Page 8

fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, which sets forth in
detail(i)the nature of each such default, (ii) the action taken
by Servicer, if any, to remedy each such default and (iii) the
current status of each such default:  NONE




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this
Certificate this 24th day of March, 1997.



                     FIRST OMNI BANK, N.A.,        
                            Servicer        
                                    
                                    
                     By  /s/ Richard H. Welsh    
                        ------------------------  
                        Name:   Richard H. Welsh
                        Title:  V.P., Controller
MAT Release: “How To Save on Cooling Costs This Season”

Statepoint Media released the article “How to Save on Cooling Costs This 

Season” on July 12, 2010. Statepoint is a news service that editors and regional 

newspapers across the country can use as a resource for stories. They service 

the 1,600 daily; 7,000 weekly; 1,400 shopper and 1,300 specialty newspapers in 

the U.S.

Typically, a story distributed with Statepoint can expect to see around 60 – 100 

print placements. 

Released: Monday, July 12, 2010

Coverage to date:

Outlet Location Run Date Circulation

The Bag, 

online blog

Ohio 7/13/2010 47,485

Thomaston 

Times

Thomaston, 

GA

7/13/2010 5,000*

*Readership: 58,985

Pending Coverage:

Outlet Location Circulation

Bethel Citizen Bethel, ME 3,600

West Texas Tribune Abilene, TX 3,500

Transylvania Times Brevard, NC 8,280

Tylertown Times Tylertown, MS 3,963

Star-Ledger Newark, NJ 434,744

Ridgewood News Ridgewood, NJ 6,873

Gazette 

(Hawthorne)

Hawthornt, NJ 19,080

Fort Lee 

Suburbanite

West Paterson, 

NJ

5,001

Edgewater View Cresskill, NJ 5,292

Community News 

(Lodi)

Lodi, NJ 28,183

Community News 

(Garfield/Wallington)

Garfield, NJ 16,465

Community News Fair Lawn, NJ 59,016
(Fair Lawn)

Holyoke Enterprise Holyoke, CO 2,100

St. Petersburg 

Times

Saint Petersburg, 

FL

344,957

Coronado Eagle & 

Journal

Coronado, CA 12,500

LaFayette Sun LaFayette, AL 3,033

Stewartville Star Stewartville, MN 2,300

Bargaineer Zion, IL 36,000

Charleston 

Gazette/Sunday 

Gazette-Mail

Charleston, WV 40,671

Herald-Chronicle Winchester, TN 14,000

Ridgewood News Ridgewood, NJ 6,873

Hesperia Resorter Hesperia, CA 5,000

Lockhart PostRegisterLockhart, TX 4,022

Eagle Lake 

Headlight

Eagle Lake, TX 1,869

Frederick Press Frederick, OK 2,500

West Side Journal Port Allen, LA 2,473

Dawson News Dawson, GA 2,800

Loudoun TimesMirrorLeesburg, VA 18,468

Free Press (Diboll) Diboll, TX 3,713

Lee County Ledger Leesburg, GA 2,900

Calhoun Times and 

Gordon County 

News

Calhoun, GA 8,750

Alabama 

Messenger

Birmingham, AL 1,575

Galion Inquirer Galion, OH 3,848

De Kalb News New Boston, TX 3,100

Bowie News Bowie, TX 4,350

Bowie County 

Citizens Tribune

New Boston, TX 12,500

*Readership: 2,702,431

"Readership" is an estimate of the total number of readers potentially exposed to the story. It is 

calculated by multiplying total circulation by 2.3, the Newspaper Association of America's 

estimate of the national average for pass-along readership of daily newspapers.
#### § 111.33-11 Propulsion systems.

Each power semiconductor converter system in a propulsion system must meet sections 4-8-5/5.17.8 and 4-8-5/5.17.9 of ABS Marine Vessel Rules (incorporated by reference; see § 110.10-1 of this subchapter), except that each one for mobile offshore drilling units must meet the requirements in section 6-1-7/12 of ABS MOU Rules (incorporated by reference; see § 110.10-1 of this subchapter).

[USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16362, Mar. 16, 2023]
Process Flow Sheet(CBI ) Attachment 7 Pa g e 1/1 TS

- F444LK ( CBI )CBI