alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2011 – Campailla v Commission**

**(Case C-265/11 P)**

Appeal – Formal requirements – Representation by a lawyer – Manifest inadmissibility

Procedure – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Application lodged without the assistance of a lawyer – Putting in order by means of a later application – Not permissible – No breach of the right to an effective remedy, of the right to access to an impartial tribunal or of the right to have the
case fairly heard (Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 19, third para., and 21, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court
of Justice, Arts 37(1), first para., and 38(3)) (see paras 7-9)

**Re:**

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Appeal brought against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 March 2011 in Case T-429/09 | Campailla | v | Commission | by which that court dismissed the applicant’s claim for damages seeking to have made good the damage supposedly sustained in consequence of the Commission’s refusal to take action in a dispute between the applicant and the Cameroonian State – Admissibility – Essential procedural requirements – Compulsory representation of natural or legal persons by a lawyer authorised to practise before the courts or tribunals of a Member State. |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Mr Campailla’s appeal is inadmissible. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | The case is removed from the register of the Court of Justice of the European Union. |
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the
"Form 10-QSB") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").

I,       Tracey A. Welsh, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
         Issuer, certify that:

         (i)      the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii)     the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Issuer.

Dated: November 14, 2003

                                   /s/ Tracey A. Welsh
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Tracey A. Welsh
                                   Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
                                   Officer
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.040-6 Marking and labeling. ( a ) The appliance shall be permanently and legibly marked by die-stamping or raised letters with the model designation of the appliance, the manufacturer's serial number for the appliance, the official Coast Guard approval number, and the name of the manufacturer. The rocket-projectiles shall be legibly marked with the name of the manufacturer, the model designation, the official Coast Guard approval number, and month and year manufactured. Primer-ejector cartridges shall be permanently and legibly marked with the name of the manufacturer, and the model designation, the official Coast Guard approval number, and the month and year manufactured.
( b ) The containers of new service lines shall bear the name of the manufacturer, date of manufacture, and a statement to the effect that in all respects the line meets the requirements of this subpart for service lines. Line faking boxes and reels shall bear the name of the manufacturer.
Note:
Compliance with the labeling requirements of this section does not relieve the manufacturer of the responsibility of complying with the label requirements of 15 U.S.C 1263, the Federal Hazardous Substances Act.
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.108-2 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this subpart with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material is available for inspection at the U.S. Coast Guard, Office of Design and Engineering Standards (CG-ENG), 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, and is available from the sources listed below. It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html*.
( b ) International Maritime Organization (IMO) Publishing, 4 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR, United Kingdom, +44 (0)20 7735 7611, *http://www.imo.org*. ( 1 ) 2010 FTP Code, International Code for Application of Fire Test Procedures, 2010 (Resolution MSC.307(88)), 2012 Edition (“FTP Code”), IBR approved for § 164.108-3(a).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.028-4 Approval and production tests. ( a ) *Approval test.* An independent laboratory accepted by the Commandant under § 159.010 of this chapter must test three pistols in accordance with the operational test in paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) *Production inspections and tests.* Production inspections and tests of each pistol must be conducted under the procedures in § 159.007 of this chapter. Each pistol which passes the production inspections and tests must be stamped with the letters “P.T.” Each pistol which fails the test must not be represented as meeting this subpart or as being approved by the Coast Guard. ( 1 ) *Inspections and tests by the manufacturer.* The manufacturer's quality control procedures must include the inspection of the pistols during production, and inspection of the finished pistols, to determine that the pistols are being produced in accordance with the approved plans. Each pistol must be tested in accordance with the operational test in paragraph (c) of this section, except that checking of the chamber and bore dimensions is not required.
( 2 ) *Inspections and tests by an independent laboratory.* An independent laboratory accepted by the Commandant under § 159.010 of this Chapter must inspect and test three pistols at least one each year. The inspection must determine that the pistols are being produced in accordance with the approved plans. The test must be in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Operational test.* The operational test must be conducted as follows: ( 1 ) Check the chamber and bore dimensions of the pistol.
( 2 ) Fire a dummy cartridge simulating a normal signal in size and weight, but with a charge double the normal charge.
( 3 ) Fire a normal signal.
( 4 ) Recheck the chamber and bore dimensions.
( 5 ) The pistol must fire the signal properly, must not have any visible deformation or damage as a result of the test, and must not have any change in the chamber and bore dimensions.
# C_2016038EN.01004701.xml

| 1.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/47

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 December 2015 — Greece and Ellinikos Chrysos v Commission

(Cases T-233/11 and T-262/11) (1)

1

((State aid - Mining sector - Aid granted by the Greek authorities to the mining company Ellinikos Chrysos - Contract for the transfer of a mining operation at a price below the real market value and exemption from taxes on that transaction - Decision declaring the aid measures unlawful and ordering recovery of the aid - Concept of advantage - Private investor test))

(2016/C 038/60)

Languages of the case: Greek and English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: P. Mylonopoulos, V. Asimakopoulos, G. Kanellopoulos and A. Iosifidou, acting as Agents) (Case T-233/11); and Ellinikos Chrysos AE Metalleion kai Viomichanias Chrysou (Kifissia, Greece) (represented initially by K. Adamantopoulos, E. Petritsi, E. Trova and P. Skouris, and subsequently by K. Adamantopoulos, E. Trova, P. Skouris and E. Roussou, lawyers) (Case T-262/11)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier and D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision 2011/452/EU of 23 February 2011 on the State aid C 48/08 (ex NN 61/08) implemented by Greece in favour of Ellinikos Chrysos AE (OJ 2011 L 193, p. 27).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Joins Cases T-233/11 and T-262/11 for the purposes of the judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Joins Cases T-233/11 and T-262/11 for the purposes of the judgment;

| 2. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the actions;

| 3. | In Case T-233/11, orders the Hellenic Republic to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

3.

In Case T-233/11, orders the Hellenic Republic to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 4. | In Case T-262/11, orders Ellinikos Chrysos AE Metalleion kai Viomichanias Chrysou to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

4.

In Case T-262/11, orders Ellinikos Chrysos AE Metalleion kai Viomichanias Chrysou to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 204, 9.7.2011.

1

---
[Civ. No. 6152.

Third Appellate District.

June 27, 1939.]

#### R E. COLE, Appellant, v. STATE PERSONNEL BOARD, etc., et al., Respondents.

Albert E. Sheets for Appellant.

Earl Warren, Attorney-General, and Ralph H. Cowing, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondents.

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying to petitioner herein a writ of mandate against the State Personnel Board et al., to compel the reinstatement of petitioner to his position in the division of highways, Department of Public Works.

Prior to the expiration of the probationary term of petitioner he received a notice attempting to dismiss him from the department. The facts in regard to the notice of dismissal are similar to the procedure used in the attempt to terminate the employment of Frank Kelly, discussed in the case of *Kelly*v. *State Personnel Board,*31 Cal. App. (2d) 443 [88 Pac. (2d) 264].

For the reasons therein stated, the judgment herein is reversed, and the petitioner reinstated to the position held by bim as highway maintenance foreman of district six' in the division of highways, Department of Public Works.

Let the peremptory writ of mandate issue by the trial court, as prayed for.
§ 169.711 Emergency lighting. ( a ) Each vessel must be equipped with a suitable number of portable battery lights.
( b ) Each vessel of 100 gross tons and over must satisfy the emergency lighting requirements for a miscellaneous self-propelled vessel as contained in part 112 of this chapter.
( c ) Each vessel of less than 100 gross tons that has accommodation spaces located below the main deck must have permanently installed lighting which is connected to a single emergency power source or permanently installed, relay-controlled, battery-operated lanterns. The lighting or lanterns must be fitted along the avenues of escape, in the wheelhouse, and in the engine compartment. ( 1 ) A single emergency power source, if provided, must be independent of the normal power source and must be either a generator or a storage battery.
( d ) The emergency power source and batteries for individual, battery-operated, lanterns must have the capacity to supply all connected loads simultaneously for at least 6 hours of continuous operations. If the emergency lighting is provided by battery power, then an automatic battery charger that maintains the battery(s) in a fully charged condition must be provided.
( e ) The emergency lighting system must be capable of being fully activated from a single location.
Page 1 of 11 

POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT 

Case Number: P020659 Assessor: Wormell 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES 

Scenario#: 1 Number of Release Sites: 

Release Activity: Manufacture 

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE 

Total Releases: 

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) 

Release Days/yr: 

Per Site Release: 

(kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) 

Remarks: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 11
POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Page 2 of 11 

CASE NUMBER:P020659 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 11
POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Page 3 of 11 

CASE NUMBER:P020659 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 11
Page 4 of 11 

POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT 

Case Number: P020659 Assessor: Wormell 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES 

Scenario#: 2 Number of Release Sites: 

Release Activity: Processing/Use 

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE 

Total Releases: 

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) 

Release Days/yr: 

Per Site Release: 

(kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) 

Remarks: 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 11
POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Page 5 of 11 

CASE NUMBER:P020659 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 11
POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Page 6 of 11 

CASE NUMBER: P020659 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 11
POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Page 7 of 11 

CASE NUMBER:P020659 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 11
POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Page 8 of 11 

CASE NUMBER:P020659 

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 11
Page 9 of 11 

POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT 

Case Number: P020659 Assessor: Wormell 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES 

Scenario#: 3 Number of Release Sites: 

Release Activity: Processing/Use 

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE 

Total Releases: 

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) 

Release Days/yr: 

Per Site Release: 

(kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) 

Remarks: 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 11
POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Page 10 of 11 

CASE NUMBER:P020659 

EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 11
POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Page 11 of 11 

CASE NUMBER: P020659 

EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 11
Editorial Note on Part 162
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 162.050-4 Incorporation by reference: Where can I get a copy of the publications mentioned in this part? ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this subpart with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce any edition other than that specified in paragraph (b) of this section, the Coast Guard must publish a notice of change in the Federal Register and the material must be available to the public. All approved material is available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .* Also, it is available for inspection at Coast Guard Headquarters. Contact Commandant (CG-ENG), Attn: Office of Design and Engineering Systems, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509, telephone 202-372-1379, and is available from the sources indicated in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *American Society for Testing and Materials* 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. ( 1 ) ASTM D2777-98, Standard Practice for Determination of Precision and Bias of Applicable Test Methods of Committee D-19 on Water (“ASTM D2777-98”), incorporation by reference approved for § 162.050-15.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( c ) *International Organization for Standardization (ISO)* 1, rue de Varembé, Case postale 56, CH-1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland (Internet: *http://www.iso.org):* ( 1 ) International Standard ISO 8217 Third edition 2005-11-01, Petroleum products—Fuels (class F)—Specifications of marine fuels (“ISO 8217”), incorporation by reference approved for § 162.050-20.
( 2 ) International Standard ISO 9377-2 First edition 2000-10-15, Water Quality—Determination of hydrocarbon oil index—Part 2: Method using solvent extraction and gas chromatography (“ISO 9377-2”), incorporation by reference approved for § 162.050-39.
( d ) *Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., (UL)* 12 Laboratory Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3995 ( 1 ) Underwriters Laboratories Standard 913 (as revised April 8, 1976), incorporation by reference approved for §§ 162.050-21, 162.050-25.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[USCG-2004-18939, 74 FR 3383, Jan. 16, 2009, as amended by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49238, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60160, Sept. 30, 2013]
# C_2013046EN.01003101.xml

| 16.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/31

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 December 2012 — Ntouvas v ECDC

(Case F-107/11) (1)

1

(Civil service - Contract staff - 2010 appraisal procedure - Application for annulment of the appraisal report)

2013/C 46/60

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ioannis Ntouvas (Sundbyberg, Sweden) (represented by: E. Mylonas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (represented by: R. Trott, Agent, and D. Waelbroeck, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Civil service — Application for annulment of the applicant’s appraisal report for the period of 1 January to 31 December 2010

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action;; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;;

| 2. | Orders Mr Ntouvas to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Ntouvas to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2012, p. 69.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2146 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2146

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the additional 
      standard deduction for State and local real property taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2009

Mrs. Halvorson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the additional 
      standard deduction for State and local real property taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ADDITIONAL STANDARD DEDUCTION FOR STATE AND 
              LOCAL REAL PROPERTY TAXES.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (C) of section 63(c)(1) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``2008 or 2009'' 
and inserting ``2008, 2009, 2010, or 2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6894

DAVID BARKSDALE, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; STAUNTON CORRECTIONAL CENTER; SANDRA EARLY, Nurse; MARSHALL, Nurse, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-331-R) Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 20, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Barksdale, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: David Barksdale, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. The district court’s dismissal without prejudice is not appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers’ Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). A dismissal without prejudice is a final order only if “‘no amendment [in the complaint] could cure the defects in the plaintiff’s case.’” Id. at 1067 (quoting Coniston Corp. v. Village of Hoffman Estates , 844 F.2d 461, 463 (7th Cir. 1988)). In ascertaining whether a dismissal without prejudice is reviewable in this court, the court must determine “whether the plaintiff could save his action by merely amending his complaint.” Domino Sugar, 10 F.3d at 1066-67. In this case, Barksdale may move in the district court to reopen his case and to file an amended complaint specifically alleging facts sufficient to state a claim under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983. Therefore, the dismissal order is not appealable. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Part 162
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 162.050-17 Separator test rig. ( a ) This section contains requirements for test rigs used in approval testing of separators. A diagram of a typical test rig is shown in Figure 162.050-17(a). FIGURE 162.050-17(a)—SEPARATOR TEST RIG
( b ) Each mixture pump on a test rig must— ( 1 ) Be a centrifugal pump capable of operating at 1,000 revolutions per minute or more;
( 2 ) Have a delivery capacity of at least 1.5 times the maximum throughput at which the separator being tested is designed to operate;
( 3 ) Have a maximum delivery pressure that is equal to or greater than the maximum influent pressure at which the separator is designed to operate; and
( 4 ) Have either bypass piping to its suction side or a throttle valve or orifice on its discharge side.
( c ) The inlet piping of the test rig must be sized so that— ( 1 ) Influent water flows at a Reynolds Number of at least 10,000;
( 2 ) The influent flow rate is between one and three meters per second; and
( 3 ) Its length is at least 20 times its inside diameter.
( d ) Each sample point on a test rig must meet the design requirements described in Figure 162.050-17(d) and must be in a vertical portion of the test rig piping.
FIGURE 162.050-17(d)—SAMPLE POINT [CGD 76-088a, 44 FR 53359, Sept. 13, 1979, as amended by USCG-2004-18939, 74 FR 3384, Jan. 16, 2009]