April 2 8 , 2015



### Petitioning for Exemption under Section 333 **For**

**Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc.**

**Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Office** 

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**800 Independence Avenue, SW**

**Washington, DC 20591**

**U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operation**

**West Building Ground Floor, Room w12**

**- 140** 

**1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE**

**Washington, DC 2059 0** 

Re: Request for exemption from multiple regulatory provisions to allow the use of small

unmanned aerial systems on land controlled by **Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc.**

to assist in the safe evaluation , inspection of roof and construction proj ects and aerial

photography and video op erations for our clients.

**Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc.** respectfully requests an exemption from

several provisions of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) to permit the

use of small unmanned aerial sys tems ( UAS) to assist in the safe evaluation , inspection

of properties and aerial photography and video operations for our clients.

This request is motivated primarily by the desire to maximize safety in infrastructure

and operations.

While an exemption wo uld not eliminate the current need for in

- person visual inspection

required by various federal regulatory departments, it would allow **Allied Roofing and**

**Sheet Metal Inc.**

to broadly evaluate assets and operations with UA , resulting in a safer and more efficient

infrastructure network. Accordingly, the grant of an exemption is consistent with Congress’

intent, reflected in Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012

(Modernization Act),

1 that safe systems be permitted in the national airspace prior to the issuance of final

regulations governing

general use of these systems.

1 P.L. 112

- 95, 126 Stat 11, February 14, 2012.

2 Section 333(b) (2) specifically contemplates that the FAA may issue a certificate of

waiver upon a finding that a type

of UAS, as a result of its size, weight, speed, operational capacity, proximity to airports and

populated areas, andoperations within visual line of sight do not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the

public or pose a threat to national

security.

**Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc.**

**Robert Borowski,**

**President**

**2801 NW 55th Ct, Bay 5W**

**Fort Lauderdale, Fl 33309**

TEL 954 485 5922

FAX 954 485 5912

Robertb@alliedroofing.cc

www.AlliedRoofingFl.com

**Background Information**

**Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc.** is a fully licensed and insured roofing contractor

company,

serving all of South Florida

. We use Safe Operations of UA for inspections, Aero

- Photography and Video of our R oofing

and Construction projects

. We understand that regulations and p rocedures must be strictly followed always for safety

of people

in ground and to no affect the safety of aerospace system.

**Operations** :

Roof Inspection , photography and video capture usage.

Construction Site Inspection. Photography and video capture usage.

**Regulatory Basis for Exemption Request**

In addition to the waiver authority provided in §333 of the Modernization Act, the FAA

may grant an exemption under 49 U.S.C. §44701(f) if it has determined that such an

exemption is in the public interest. The FAA has imposed a separate requirement in its

procedural regulations, providing that the petitioner shall explain why granting t he

exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide at least

an equivalent level of safety as compliance with the underlying regulation. In this case,

approval of this exemption would advance the public interest by significant ly enhancing

the safety and efficiency of operations and by providing the FAA with

valuable user experience on UA in a context with appreciable economic and societal

benefits. As described more fully below, the requested exemption would permit the

operatio n of UA under tightly controlled conditions, thus ensuring that operations will

not have an adverse impact on safety.

Additionally, the sheer amount of assets and the widely dispersed locations

– in many

instances far from sizeable population centers

– m eans that visual inspection in allinstances by company personnel can be inefficient. Aerial analysis by traditional fixed

wing aircraft is impractical because the required altitudes for safe flight reduce visibility

below meaningful levels

– it is simply not possible to see all asset anomalies from such

heights. Helicopters present better vantage points; however manned helicopters are much

more costly, subject to human safety and carry highly explosive jet fuel making them

imprac tical for deployment. By us ing UA for supplemental asset evaluation, I Allied Roofing

and Sheet Metal Inc.

will be able to substantially upgrade its capacity to detect and address issues with the

right

- of

- way and other assets before they become a problem for safe operations. Thus, t he

use of UA has the potential to improve efficiency, resulting in faster and safer delivery

of goods, energy & natural resources vital to the U.S. economy.

**Granting an Exemption will not Adversely Affect Safety**

Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc. note that there is no applicable standard for an

equivalency determination. Some

have argued that the appropriate standard is that for model aircraft, noting that their

operations, if conducted for recreational purposes, would fall completely within the

allowable operations for model aircraft. We believe it is difficult to argue that there is

sufficient correlation between model operations controlled by the Academy of Model

Aeronautics and the ones contemplated by Me . At the same time, it is clear that

eq uivalency cannot be established for traditional, manned civil aircraft because the design

and use profiles be tween traditional aircraft and UA are simply too different. As such,

we believe it makes more sense to focus on why the contemplated operations wou ld not

adversely affect safety, which is all that §11.81(e) requires.

Granting an exemption will not adversely affect safety. Allied **Roofing and Sheet Metal**

**Inc**

. contemplate conducting UA operations over client owned or controlled land,

solely during daylight hours, at altitudes well below that which would pose a risk to

other aircraft. In general, UA operations are intended to be conducted in areas distant from

both congested areas and airports.

Moreover, because of the inherent risks presen ted by standard infrastructure

operations, our clients have already taken steps to secure property against unauthorized

public access. For example, substantial stretches of pipeline, utilities, railroad track and

oil production sites are fenced, elevated, or otherwise secured to prevent access. Other

long stretches of infrastructure are, as noted above, in very remote wilderness areas. The

nature of operations anticipated by Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc. r equires that the UA

be

flown at relatively lo w altitudes and relatively low speeds. Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal

Inc.

expect that in most instances, the UA will be flown less than 75 feet from the highest

stru cture

along the path of the UA

. Accordingly, the risk of interference with another aircraf t is minimal. Allied Roofing and

Sheet Metal Inc.

also plans to conduct UA operations at least three miles from any public airports (includingheliports). In the event an operation needs to be conducted closer to an airport, Allied

Roofing and Sheet

Metal Inc. will inform the airport operator and airport air traffic control tower of the

contemplated

operation and will comply with any directions issued by air traffic control at that airport.

Approval of exemptions all owing commercial operations of UA in the infrastructure

aerial inspection industry will enhance safety by reducing risk. Conventional operations,

using jet or piston power aircraft, operate at extremely low altitudes just feet from the

subject being inspected and in extreme proximity to pe ople and structures; and present

the risks associated with vehicles that weigh in the neighborhood of 4,000lbs., carrying

large amounts of jet A or other fuel (140 gallons for jet helicopters). Such aircraft must

fly to and from the inspection site. In con trast, a UA weighing fewer than 55 lbs. and

powered by batteries eliminates virtually all of that risk given the reduced mass and lack

of combustible fuel carried on board. The UA is carried to the inspection site. The

UA will carry no passengers or crew a nd, therefore, will not expose them to the risks

associated with manned aircraft flights.

The operation of small UAs, weighing less than 55 lbs., conducted in the strict

conditions outlined above, will provide an equivalent level of safety supporting the grant

of the exemptions requested herein, including 333 Aircraft Exemption Status exempting

the applicant from conventional aircraft requirements and allowing commercial

operations. These lightweight aircraft operate at slow speeds, close to the ground, and in

a controlled environment and, as a result, are far safer than conventional operations

conducted with turbine helicopters operating in close proximity to the ground and people.

The safety of those on the ground is protected by the fact that no one will be allowed into

the area without the permission of the company. Security will be established for the flight

area as part of the pre

- flight control. Each individual within the secur e area will be

briefed prior to flight and will consent to being in the area. All others will be excluded

from the area.

**Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc.** will operate the UA within visual line

- of

- sight (i.e.,

no more

than approximately 0.5 miles from the manipulator of the controls, or pilot in command

(PIC)).

PIC will conduct at least three t ake

- offs and landings with the UA on which he or she is

trained every 90 days.

PIC’s will establish their qualifications thru a combination of a e ronautical knowledge,

UAS airmanship skills, and verification through testing of flight ability before any

operations have commenced.

Depending on the type of operation, additional ground

- based visual observers may be

employed as well.

These observers will be within constant visual line of sight and in constant contact with the

PIC.

The visual

observers will assist the PI C in avoiding objects near the UA

There are no standards fo r either Private or Commercial UA pilot certificates. The safeoperation an d control of the UA as described in this application does not depend on the

type of FAA license held by the PIC. Given the restricted and controlled airspace within

which operations will take place, the key factors needed by the PIC are knowledge of the

ai rspace within which the operation will take place and how that airspace fits into the

National Airspace System (NAS). That knowledge can be and is gained primarily

through ground school and not through flight training in fixed wing or rotor aircraft, nor

i s it dependent on the acquisition of a commercial or private pilot’s certificate. Those

certificates demonstrate knowledge of the factors and skills needed for the safe operation

of those types of aircraft (fixed wing or rotorcraft). It cannot be assumed t hat a

commercial pilot, approved to operate a helicopter or fixed wing aircraft, has the skill or

ability to safely operate a small unmanned aerial vehicle, operating at 400 AGL or lower,

within strictly controlled pre

- approved airspace. Besides knowledge of airspace

regulations, dexterity in th e control and operation of the UA acquired from actual

operation of the aircraft is the most important factor in establishing an equivalent level of

safety.

If the PIC has acquired the necessary knowledge of airspace requirements, the relevant

issues are (1) where the aircraft will be flown, (2) the size of the aircraft relative to what

is being used today to accomplish the same mission, and (3) what precautions will be

taken to ensure the safety of those in the area of operation. We propose that the PIC has

at least an FAA Private Pilots Cer tificate ; the aircraft be operated within a secure

environment;

and that no one be allowed to enter the secure environment

unless they ar e part of the operation, have been fully briefed of the risks prior to

operation of the UA , and have consented to the risks associated with being in the

operating area. Sh ould there be a mishap, the UA being flown pose significantly less of

a threat than t he helicopters and fixed wing aircraft now being employed because they are

a fraction of the size, carry no flammable fuel, do not carry crew or passengers, and pose

an infinitesimal risk to others. This is in stark contrast to conventional aircraft that a re

flown to the site, carry explosive fuel, carry passengers and crew, and operate in a much

larger area.

From a practical standpoint, there are relatively few licensed full

- scale aircraft pilots who

are als o qualified to fly the type of UA that are utilized for infrastructure image

- capture

operations. There are even fewer commer cial pilots that can fly these UA

– to the point

that to do both is considered rare. Assuming that it is unlikely for a company to find a

pilot that has both qualifi cations, that company would either have to source a qualified

UA pilot to train and obtain a commercial certificate, or find a commercial certificated

pilot who woul d be willing to learn to fly a UA to the competency level required for

professional use.

M inimum requirements for the PIC include:

1) Private Pilot’s license;

2) A minimum of 200 flight cycles and 25 hours of total time as a U ASrotorcraft

pilot and at least 10 hours logged as a U A pilot with a similar UA type

(single blade or multirotor);

3) A minimum of 5 hours as UA pilot with the make and model of sUAS to be

utilized for operations under the exemption and 3 take offs and landings in thepreceding 90 days;

4) Have undergone a qualification process as specified in the Flight Operations &

Procedures Manual consisting of a knowledge & skill test of the aircraft to be

used.

Another consideration supporting the certificate requirement is that pilots holding a

private pilot certificate are subject to security screening by the Department of Home land

Security. This requirement should ameliorate security concerns over UAS operations

under this exemption.

Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc. intends to use commercially available UA Components

for UA . These

UA systems will be tested for quality & safe ty in our test facility before being

deployed to the field. The UA is less than 55 lbs. fully loaded, carries neither a pilot

nor passenger, and operates exclusively within a secured area. We have a routine

maintenan ce schedule to verify that the UA will r emain in safe and operational

condition.

Please see **Appendix B** , for Specific Types of UA

. Notes Regarding: 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H

In accordance with the statutory criteria provided in

Section 333 of PL 112

-- - 95 in reference to 49 USC 44704, and in consideration of

t he size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the aircraft and its

operation, we request that this aircraft exemption meets the conditions of S ection 333.

Therefore, if granted Section 333 relief of 14 CFR part 21, and any associated noise

C ertification and testing requirements of part 36, is not necessary.

Notes Regarding: 14 C.F.R. § 45.23 (b). Marking of the Aircraft

Given the size of the sUAV, two

- inch lettering will be impossible. UA

W ill be identified by serial number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47,

A nd have identification (N

-- - Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR P art 45,

Subpart C.

Markings will be as large as practicable.

Notes Regarding: 14 CFR § 91.7(a) Civil Aircraft Airworthiness

our request is based on the fact that no airworthiness certificate will be issued for

the UA

. our UA will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with

14 CFR part 21, Subpart H. Based on the fact that an airworthiness certifica te will not be

issued, exemption from § 91.7(a) is not necessary.

Notes Regarding: 14 CFR § 91.9(b)(2) Civil aircraft flight manual, marking & placard

Certifications required, the original intent of these regulations was to display an aircraft’s

airworthin ess, certification, and registration documents so they would be easily available

to inspectors and passengers. Based on the FAA Memorandum subject “Interpretation

regarding whether certain required documents may be kept at an unmanned aircraft’s

control st ation,” dated August 8, 2014, the requested relief from 14 CFR §§ 91.9(b)(2)

and 91.203(a) and (b) is not necessary.

Notes Regarding: §91.109 Flight instruction; Simulated instrument & certain flight tests

Small UA , by their design, do not have fully funct ional dual controls. Flight control is

accomplished through the use of a control box that communicates with the aircraft viaradio communications. Aircraft being considered for use by **Allied Roofing and Sheet**

**Metal Inc.** allow the UA

Instructor to place the aircraft into ‘loiter’ mode (fixed altitude stationary hold). In the

event of the student losing control, the UA Instructor can quickly and via alternate

equipment (equipment not in the hands of the student) place the aircraft into a mode that

then allows the instructor to bring the aircraft back into control and back to the

predetermined

and/or safe landing location.

Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc. does not describe training scenarios in which a dual set

of controls would be

utilized or required, i.e. dual flight instruction, provided by a flight instructor or other

company

- designated individual, that would require that individual to have fully

functioning dual controls. Rather, **Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc.** evaluates the

qualification of its PIC s based on

their experience with the UA to be operated and verifies through testing, in lieu of

formalized training. As such, **Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc**

. does not seek relief from

14 CFR § 91.109.

Notes Regarding § 14 CFR 91.119(b)

Relief from § 14 CFR 91.119(b), operation over congested areas, is not applicable,

because the **Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc**

. operations will only be conducted within

the secured area described

herein.

**Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc. Safety Operations &**  **Procedures Overview:**

Technology Considerations:

Best

- in

- class, tried and proven technologies that are in advanced iterations. Software from

highly

- reputable industry partners will include features:

1. Auto descent (landing) if communication signal were to be severed. If the UA

loses communications, the sUAS will have capability to return to a pre

- determined

location within the Security Perimeter and land.

2. Auto descent (landing) if battery were to drop lower than nominal level.

3. Flights will be terminated at 25% battery power reserve.

4. Live video for operator gives real

- time positioning feedback. In other words, we

can monitor the scene from the vehicle's perspective for collision avoidance, and to

maintain spatial orientation.

5. The UA will have the capability to abort a flight in case of unpredicted obstacles

or emergencies.

6. On

- Screen

- Display (OSD) contains operating information to ascertain vehicle

health at all times: speed, altitude, num ber of GPS satellites (when available),

heading and voltage.

7. GPS lock supplies for return

- to

- home (RTH). Should Command and Control (C2)

link failures occur (highly improbable), vehicle returns automatically to the point of

launch.

8. Altitude infor mati on will be provided to the UA pilot via a digitally encodedtelemetric data feed, which downlinks from the aircraft to a ground

- based on

- screen

display. This altitude information will be generated by equipment installed on board

the aircraft, using GPS triangulation, or digitally encoded barometric altimeter, or

radio altimeter, or any combination thereof. Prior to each flight, a zero altitude

initiation point will be established and confirmed for accuracy by the pilot.

Mechanical/P hysical:

1. We will fly line

- of

- sight (LOS) only. The vehicle will always remain in direct LOS

to the pilot, thus eliminating the concern of signal severance (flying behind

objects/walls).

2. The UA will weigh less than 55 lbs and travel at less than 50 kn ots.

3. Batteries should far exceed the capacity required for actual flight time.

4. Flights will be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet AGL.

5. Fireproof bags for storage and charging of high capacity Lipo batteries on

- site.

6. UA

O perated un der this exemption will be marked in accordance with 14 CFR part 45

O r as otherwise authorized by the FAA.

Personnel:

1. Spotters ensure safe operation and act as a redundant set of eyes for operators

(pilot, gimbal op, director)

2. Radio spectrum analysis for interference on the frequencies utilized for vehicle

control/communication.

3. A briefing will be cond ucted in regard to the planned UAS operations prior to

each day’s activities. It will be mandatory that all personnel who will be performing

duties w ithin the boundaries of the safety perimeter be present for this briefing.

4. The operator will obtain the consent of all persons involved in the UA operations

and ensure that only consenting persons will be allowed within 100 feet of the flight

operations

. 5. Observer and pilot will at all times be able to communicate by voice.

6. Written and/or oral permission from the relevant property holders will be obtained.

7. Pilot and observer will have been trained in operation of UAS generally and

received up

- to

- date information on the particular UAS to be operated.

Operations:

1. The unmanned aircraft (UA) must weigh less than 55 pounds (25 Kg),

including energy source(s) and equipment. Operations authorized by this petition

of exemption are limited to th e following aircraft described in Appendix B.

Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition

amendment to this request.

2. The UA may not be flown at a ground speed exceeding 50 knots.

3. Flights must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground

level (AGL), as indicated by the procedures specified in the operator’s manual.

All altitudes reported to ATC must be in feet AGL.

4. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at al l

times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device

other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA

- issued medicalcertificate.

5. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The VO may be used to

satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS

capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times.

6. The operator’s manual included as Appendix C and this petition of exemption

must be maintained and made availabl e to the Administrator upon request. If a

discrepancy exists between the conditions and limitations in this exemption and

the procedures outlined in the operator’s manual, the conditions and limitations

herein take precedence and must be followed. Otherwis e, the operator must

follow the procedures as outlined in its operator’s manual.

The operator may update or revise its operator’s manual. It is the operator’s

responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised documents

to the Administrator upon request. The operator must also present updated and

revised documents if it petitions for extension or amendment. If the operator

determines that any update or revision would affect the basis for which the FAA

grants this petition f or exemption, then the operator must petition for amendment

to their exemption. The FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS

- 80) may be

contacted if questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the operator’s

manual.

7. Prior to each flight the PIC must insp ect the UA to ensure it is in a condition

for safe flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation

of the UA , the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary

maintenanc e has been performed and the UA is found to be in a condition for

safe flight. The Ground Control Station, if utilized, must be included in the

preflight inspection. All maintenance and alterations must be properly

documented in the aircraft records.

8. Any UA that has undergone maintenance or alter ations that affect the UA

operation or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component,

must undergo a functional test flight in accordance with the operator’s manual.

The PIC who conducts the functional test flight must make an ent ry in the UA

aircraft records of the flight. The requirements and procedures for a functional test

flight and aircraft record entry must be added to the operator’s manual.

9. The operator must follow the manufacturer’s UA aircraft/component,

maintenance, o verhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements.

When unavailable, aircraft maintenance/component/overhaul, replacement, and

inspection/maintenance requirements must be established and identified in the

operator’s manual. At a minimum, requir ements for the following must be

included in the operator’s manual:

a. Actuators / Servos;

b. Transmission (single rotor);

c. Powerplant (motors);

d. Propellers;

e. Electronic speed controller;

f. Batteries;

g. Mechanical dynamic components (single rotor);

h. Remote command and control;i. Ground control station (if used); and

j. Any other components as determined by the operator;

10. The Pilot In Command (PIC) must possess at least a private pilot certificate

The PIC must also meet the flight review requir ements specified in 14 CFR § 61.56

in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate.

11. Prior to operations conducted for the purpose of infrastructure inspections, the

PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent w ith 14 CFR §

61.51(b), a minimum of 200 flight cycles and 25 hours of total time as a UAS

rotorcraft pilot and at least 10 hours logged as a UAS pilot with a similar UAS

type (single blade or multirotor). Prior documented flight experience that was

obtaine d in compliance with applicable regulations may satisfy this requirement.

Training, proficiency, and experience

- building flights can also be conducted

under this petition of exemption to accomplish the required flight cycles and flight

time. During trainin g, proficiency, and experience

- building flights, all persons not

essential for flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must

operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with

14 CFR § 91.119.

12. Prior to operations conducted for the purpose of infrastructure inspection, the

PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 CFR §

61.51(b), a minimum of five hours as UAS pilot operating the make and model of

UAS to be utilized for operations under the exemption and three take

- offs and

three landings in the preceding 90 days. Training, proficiency, experiencebuilding,

and take

- off and landing currency flights can be conducted under this

petition of exemption to accomplish the require d flight time and 90 day currency.

During training, proficiency, experience

- building, and take

- off and landing

currency flights all persons not essential for flight operations are considered

nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with appropriate distance from

nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

13. Prior to any flight operations authorized by this petition of exemption, the PIC

and VO must have successfully completed a qualification process, as outlined in

the operator’s manual. A s this is a requirement stipulated by the operator, the test

must be developed and implemented by a qualified person designated at the sole

discretion of the operator. A record of completion of this qualification process

must be documented and made availab le to the Administrator upon request.

14. Prior to operations conducted for the purpose of infrastructure inspection, a flight

demonstration, administered by an operator

- approved and

- qualified pilot must be

successfully completed and documented. This docu mentation must be available for

review upon request by the Administrator. Because the knowledge and airmanship

test qualifications have been developed by the operator, and there are no established

practical test standards that support a jurisdictional FAA FSDO evaluation and

approval of company designated examiners, the petitioner will conduct these tests in

accordance with the operator’s manual.

15. The UA may not be operated directly over any person, except authorized and

consenting personnel, below an al titude that is hazardous to persons or property on

the surface in the event of a UAS failure or emergency.

16. Regarding the distance from participating persons, the operator’s manual hassafety mitigations for authorized and consenting personnel. At all t imes, those

persons must be essential to the operations.

17. Regarding distance from nonparticipating persons, the operator must ensure that

no persons are allowed within 500 feet of the area except those consenting to be

involved and necessary for the infrastructure inspection operations. This provision

may be reduced to no less than 200 feet if it would not adversely affect safety and the

Administrator has approved it. For example, an equivalent level of safety may be

determined by an aviation safety inspector’s evaluation of the infrastructure

inspection area to note terrain features, obstructions, buildings, safety barriers, etc.

Such barriers may protect nonparticipating persons (observers, the public, news

media, etc.) from de bris in the event of an accident.

18. If the UA loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UA must return to a

pre

- determined location within the security perimeter and land or be recovered in

accordance with the operator’s manual.

19. The UA must a bort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or

emergencies in accordance with the operator’s manual.

20. Each UA operation must be completed with 25% battery power remaining.

21. The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) issued C ertificate of

Waiver or Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under this petition

of exemption. This COA will also require the operator to request a Notice to Airman

(NOTAM) not more than 72 hours in advance, but not less than 48 hours pri or to the

operation.

22. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must be identified by

serial number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification

(N

- Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Ma rkings must

be as large as practicable.

23. The operator must develop procedures to document and maintain a record of the

UA maintenance, preventative maintenance, alterations, status of

replacement/overhaul component parts, and the total time in service o f the UA

. These procedures must be added to the operator’s manual.

24. Each UA operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer

Safety Bulletins.

2 5. The operator must develop UA technician qualification criteria. These criteria

must be added to the operator’s manual.

26. The preflight inspection section in the operator’s manual must be amended to

include the following requirement: The preflight inspection must account for all

discrepancies, i.e. inoperable components, items, or equip ment, not covered in the

relevant preflight inspection sections of the operator’s manual.

27. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for operation

and control of the UA must comply with the Federal Communications Commission

(FCC) o r other appropriate government oversight agency requirements.

28. At least three days before scheduled infrastructure inspection, the operator of the

UA affected by this exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local

FSDO with jurisdiction over the area of proposed infrastructure inspection. The 3

- day

notification may be waived with the concurrence of the FSDO.

The plan of activitiesm ust include at least the following:a. Dates and times for all flights;

b. Name and phone nu mber of the op erator for the UA infrastructure

inspection operations conducted under this petition of exemption;

c. Name and phone number of the person responsible for the on

- scene

operation of the UA ;

d. Make, model, and serial or N

- number of UAS to be used;

e. Name an d certificate number of UAS PICs involved in the infrastructure

inspection event;

f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property

owners and/or local officials to conduct the infrastructure inspection event;

the list of those who gav e permission must be made available to the inspector

upon request;

g. Signature of exemption

- holder or representative; and

h. A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area,

city, town, county, and/or state over which infrastructure inspection will be

conducted and the altitudes essential to accomplish the operation.

29. The documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to

the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is o perating.

These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law

enforcement official upon request.

30. The UA must remain clear and yield the right of way to all other manned

operations and activities at all times (including, but not limit ed to, ultralight vehicles,

parachute activities, parasailing activities, hang gliders, etc.).

31. UA operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1.

All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC).

F lights under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized.

32. The UA may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

33. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

34. The UA may not operate in Class B, C, or D airspace without written approval

from the FAA. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of the geographic

center of a non

- towe red airport as denoted on a current FAA

- published aeronautical

chart unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is obtained, and the

operation is conducted in accordance with a NOTAM as required by the operator’s

COA. The letter of agreeme nt with the airport management must be made available to

the Administrator upon request.

35. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be r eported

to the FAA’s UAs Integration Office (AFS

- 80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be

reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions

contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov. Further flight operations may not

be conducted until the incident, accident, or transgression is reviewed by AFS

- 80 and

authorization to resume operations is provided.

**Support for Petition for Exemption**In accordance with the procedural requirements of 14 C.F.R. §11.81, **Allied Roofing and**

**S heet Metal Inc.** 

provides the following information:

**Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc.**

**Robert Borowski,**

**President**

**2801 NW 55th Ct, Bay 5W**

**Fort Lauderdale, Fl 33309**

**TEL 954 485 5922**

**FAX 954 485 5912**

**Robertb@alliedroofing.cc**

**www.AlliedRoofingFl.com**

**Regulatory Provisions from which Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc.** 

**seeks an Exemption**

Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc. believes it may need an exemption from the following

provisions to conduct the contemplated operations. In some instances, relief is needed

because relief from another provision renders compliance with the regulation at hand

infeasible.

333 Aircraft Exem ption Status

14 C.F.R. §61.113(a) and (b)

14 C.F.R. §91.119(c)

14 C.F.R. §91.121

14 C.F.R. §91.151

14 C.F.R. §91.405(a)

14 C.F.R. §91.407(a)

14 C.F.R. §91.409(a)(1)&(2)

14 C.F.R. §91.417(a)&(b)

**Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc.** believes an exemption is only needed from the

above

- listed regulatory provisions.

To the extent that the FAA believes that additional relief is required for **Allied Roofing and**

**Sheet Metal Inc.**

to conduct the operations described here, we request an exem ption from any such

regulatory provisions as well.

14 C.F.R. §91.417(a) imposes certain maintenance record keeping requirements “as

applicable”.

Since none of the underlying requirements (e.g., inspection intervals) can be met and will

require an exemptio n, **Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc.** believes a separate exemption

should

not be required for §91.417(a).

**The Extent of Requested Relief and the Reasons Relief is Needed**

**Section 333 Aircraft Exemption Status:**Section 333 of the Modernization Act authorizes the FAA to exempt aircraft from the

requirement for an airworthiness certificate based on a consideration of the size, weight,

speed, operational capability of the particular UA , as well as its proximity to airports and

populated areas. An analy sis of these criteria demonstrates that the UA operated without

an

airworthiness certificate in the areas and under the conditions contemplated by

**Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc.** will be at least as safe, or safer, than a conventional

aircraft

(fixed wing or rotorcraft) operating with an airworthiness certificate without the

conditions

proposed in this request.

The UA is less than 55 lbs. fully loaded, carries neither a pilot nor passenger, and operates

exclusively within a secured area. Unlike other civil aircraft, operations under this

exemption

will be tightly controlled and monitored by the operator and observer. Operations will be

conducted in compliance with the FAA and with local public safety requirements to provide

security for the area of op eration as is now done with conventional equipment,

infrastructure,

bridge and out building evaluation. These safety enhancements provide an expanded

degree

of safety to the inspectors over conventional operations. Lastly, application of these same

criteri a demonstrates that there is no credible threat to nat ional security posed by the UA

, due to its size, speed of operation, location of operation, lack of explosive materials and

inability to carry a substantial external load.

Given the size and limited ope rating area associated with the aircraft to be utilized by the

Applicant, this meets the requirements of an equivalent level of safety under Part 11 and

Section 333 of the Reform Act. The Federal Aviation Act (49 U.S.C.§44701 (f)) and

Section 333 of the Re form Act both authorize the FAA to exempt aircraft from the

requirement for an airworthiness certificate, upon consideration of the size, weight,

speed, operational capability, and proximity to airports and populated areas of the

particular UA. In all case s, an analysis of these criteria demonstrates that the UAS

operated without an airworthiness certificate, in the restricted environment and under the

conditions proposed will be at least as safe, or safer, than a conventional aircraft (fixed

wing or rotorc raft) operating with an airworthiness certificate without the restrictions and

conditions proposed.

14 C.F.R. §61.113(a) and (b)

**§61.113 Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command.**

(a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) through (h) of this section, no person

who holds a private pilot certificate may act as pilot in command of an aircraft

that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire; nor may that

person, for compensation or hire, act as pilot in command of an aircraft.

(b) A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as pilot in command of

an aircraft in connection with any business or employment if:

(1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and

(2) The aircraft does not carry pass engers or property for compensation orhire.

**Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc.** will conduct the UA operations. The UA will fly at

altitudes well below the permissible limits for other civil aircraft, eliminating the risk to

other aircraft

.

**§91.119 Minimum safe altitudes: General.** 

Except when necessary for takeoff or landing, no person may operate an

aircraft

below the following altitudes:

(c) Over other than congested areas. An altitude of 500 feet above the surface,

except over open water or spars ely populated areas. In those cases, the aircraft

may not be operated closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or

structure.

**Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc.** submits that the only relief it requires from §91.119

is from the minimum altitudes listed in paragraph (c). Relief is required from paragraph (c)

for fixed wing

operations because asset evaluation conducted at 500 feet or higher is insufficiently

distinct to be meaningful. Since operations at this altitude also pose a heightene d risk of

collision with another aircraft, safety can only be assured through the grant of an

exemption.

14 C.F.R. 91.121

**14 C.F.R. §91.121 Altimeter Settings**

This regulation requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising

altitude by reference to an altimeter that is set “...to the elevation of the departure

airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.”

As the U A may not have a barometric altimeter, but instead a GPS altitude read

out, an exemption may be needed. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by the

operator, pursuant to the Manual and Safety Check list, confirming the altitude of the

launch site shown on the GPS altitude indicator before flight.

Altitude infor mation will be provided to the UA pilot via a digitally encoded telemetric

data feed, which downlinks from the aircraft to a ground

- based on

- screen display. This

altitude information will be generated by equipment installed on board the aircraft, using

GPS triangulation, or digitally e ncoded barometric altimeter, or radio altimeter, or any

combination thereof. Prior to each flight, a zero altitude initiation point will be established

and confirmed for accuracy by the pilot.

14 C.F.R. 91.151

**§91.151 Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions.** 

(a) No person may begin a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless

(considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly

to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed

–(1) During t he day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes.

(b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless

(considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly

to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to

fly after that for at least 20 minutes.

Operating the UA in a pre

- defined area with less than 30 minutes of reserve

fuel does not raise the type of risk contemplated by §91.151, i.e., that an aircraft could

run out of fuel in the event it has to be flown to an alternate airport or circle the planned

airport in the event of unanticipated conditions.

We believe that a 25% battery reserve is more than sufficient to meet this objecti ve

14 C.F.R. 91.405(a), 91.407(a) (1), 14 C.F.R. 91.409(a) (1)&(2) and 14 C.F.R. 91.417(a) & (b)

**§91.405 Maintenance required.**

Each owner or operator of an aircraft

– (a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and

shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this

section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter;

**§91.407 Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance,**

**rebuilding, or alteration.**

(a) No person may operate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance,

rebuilding, or alteration unless

– (1) It has been approved for return to service by a person authorized under

§43.7 of this chapter;

**§91.409 Inspections.**

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate

an aircraft unless, within the preceding 12 calendar months, it has had __

(1) An annual inspection in accordance with part 43 of this chapter and has

been approved for return to service by a person authorized by §43.7 of this

chapter; or

(2) An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in

accordance with part 21 of this chapter.

**§91.417 (a) & (b)**

**Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc.** believes that an exemption from these three

maintenance

requirements is appropriate because the FAA has not developed maintenance standards

that would allow

an operator to meet the part 91 maintenance requirements. In particular, there are no

individuals auth orized by the FAA to approve a UA for return to service under

§91 .407(a) or to conduct the initial airworthiness and annual return to service inspections

required by §91.409(a). **Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc.** will maintain the aircraft as

instructedin the owner’s manual and ASTM F2909, where applicable, and will not operate the aircraft

until it has

reasonably determined that any needed repairs have been made. However, because of the

technical impossibility of meeting the requirements of §§91.405(a), 407(a), 409(a) and

417(a)&(b), we believe an exemption from thes e provisions is appropriate.

Please do not hesitate to contact me at the phone number or via the e

- mail address

provided above should you have any questions or concerns.

Respectfully submitted,

**Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc.**

**Robert Borowski,**

**President**

**2801 NW 55th Ct, Bay 5W**

**Fort Lauderdale, Fl 33309**

**TEL 954 485 5922**

**FAX 954 485 5912**

**Robertb@alliedroofing.cc**

**www.AlliedRoofingFl.com**

Summary for Federal Register Publication

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11, the following summary is provided for publication in the

Federal Register should the FAA determine that publication is needed.

Petitioner: **Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc.**

Sections of 14 C.F.R . Affected:

333 Aircraft Exemption Status

14 C.F.R. §61.113(a) and (b)

14 C.F.R. §91.119(c)

14 C.F.R. §91.121

14 C.F.R. §91.151

14 C.F.R. §91.405(a)

14 C.F.R. §91.407(a)

14 C.F.R. §91.409(a)

14 C.F.R. §91.417(a)&(b)

Description of Relief Sought:

Petitioner seeks relief from the requirements of 333 Aircraft Exemption Status, 14

C.F.R., 61.113(a)&(b)), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151, 91.405(a), 91.407(a), 91.409(a), and

91.417(a)&(b) to conduct UA operations over our Client’s owned or controlled

land, solely durin g daylight hours. UA operations are intended to be conducted

in areas remote from both congested areas and airports. The nature of operations

anticipated by Allied Roofing and Sheet Metal Inc. requires that the UA be flown at

relatively low altitudes.**GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS**

AGL Above Ground Level

AOI Area of Interest

ATC Air Traffic Control

ATO Air Traffic Organization

AV Aerial Vehicle

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

COA Certificate Of Authorization

FAA Federal Aviation Administration

FAR Federal A viation Regulation

GCS Ground Control Station

GPS Global Positioning System

LOL Loss Of Link

NAS National Airspace System

NOTAM Notice To Airman

PIC Pilot In Command

Section 333 FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333

SO Safety Observer

SOP Standard Operating Procedures

UA Unmanned Aircraft

UAS Unmanned Aircraft System

VFR Visual Flight Rules

VLOS Visual Line Of Site

VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions

VTOL Vertical Take

- Off and Landing

**Specific type(s),**  **make, and**  **model**

**DJI Phantom**  **2 Vision +**  **(owned)**

**Also we are Planning to Purchase**

**DJI Phantom 3**

**DJI Inspire 1**

**See Attached**  **Picture of o u**  **r DJI**  **Phantom 2**  **Vision + and a PDF**  **document**

**with Manual and specs for**  **DJI Phantom 2 Vision +**