alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013046EN.01001801.xml

| 16.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 January 2013 — Kokomarina v OHIM — Euro Shoe Group (interdit de me gronder IDMG)

(Case T-568/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Community - Figurative mark interdit de me gronder IDMG - Earlier Benelux word mark DMG - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Genuine use of the earlier mark disputed for the first time before the General Court)

2013/C 46/32

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kokomarina (Concarneau, France) (represented by: C. Charrière-Bournazel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Euro Shoe Group (Beringen, Belgium) (represented by: I. Vernimme, lawyer

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 July 2011 (Case R 1814/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Euro Shoe Unie and Kokomarina

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Kokomarina to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Kokomarina to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 14.1.2012.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 162
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 162.050-11 Marking. ( a ) Each separator, oil content meter, and bilge alarm manufactured under Coast Guard approval must be plainly marked by the manufacturer with the information listed in paragraph (b) of this section. The marking must be securely fastened to the item.
( b ) Each marking must include the following information: ( 1 ) Name of the manufacturer.
( 2 ) Name or model number of the item.
( 3 ) If the item is a separator, the maximum throughput and the maximum influent pressure at which the separator is designed to operate.
( 4 ) The month and year of completion of manufacture.
( 5 ) The manufacturer's serial number for the item.
( 6 ) The Coast Guard approval number assigned to the item in the certificate of approval.
( 7 ) A list of bilge cleaners, solvents, and other chemical compounds that do not impair operation of the item.
( 8 ) If the item is an oil content meter, the oils for which use has been approved.
( 9 ) If the item is a separator that uses replaceable filter or coalescer elements, the part numbers of the elements.
[CGD 76-088a, 44 FR 53359, Sept. 13, 1979, as amended by USCG-2004-18939, 74 FR 3383, Jan. 16, 2009]
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 4 - 0175 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 4 -NM - 014 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### CF - 2014 - 04 **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s , list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the co mments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
§ 171.072 Calculation of permeability for Type II subdivision. When doing calculations to show compliance with § 171.070, the following uniform average permeabilities must be assumed: ( a ) 85 percent in the machinery space.
( b ) 60 percent in the following spaces: ( 1 ) Tanks that are normally filled when the vessel is in the full load condition.
( 2 ) Chain lockers.
( 3 ) Cargo spaces.
( 4 ) Stores spaces.
( 5 ) Mail or baggage spaces.
( c ) 95 percent in all other spaces.
[CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51017, Nov. 4, 1983, as amended by USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58287, Sept. 29, 2014]
§ 131.835 Portable fire extinguishers. ( a ) Except as provided by paragraph (b) of this section, ach portable fire extinguisher must be marked with a number, and the site of its stowage must be marked with a corresponding number at least 13 millimeters (1 ⁄ 2-inch) high.
( b ) If only one type and size of portable fire extinguisher is carried, the number may be omitted.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.002-2 Size and models. Each life preserver specified in this subpart is to be a: ( a ) Model 3, adult, 24 ounces kapok; or
( b ) Model 5, child, 16 ounces kapok.
[CGD 72-163R, 38 FR 8118, Mar. 28, 1973]
Bank of South Carolina 10-K



Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 USC 1350 (Section 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



I, Sheryl G. Sharry, Chief Financial Officer/Executive
Vice President of Bank of South Carolina Corporation (the “Company”), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based
upon a review of the annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2013 of the Company (the “report):



| | 1. | the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                          
| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     



|Date: February 27, 2014 |     |                                                 
|----------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------
|                        |     |                                                 
|                        | BY: | /s/Sheryl G. Sharry                             
|                        |     | Sheryl G. Sharry                                
|                        |     | Chief Financial Officer/Executive Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      19,018,697
<SECURITIES>                                 2,843,101
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,804,833
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,233,121
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,731,839
<PP&E>                                      10,396,114
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,665,594
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,248,090
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,997,755
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,745,777
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,248,090
<SALES>                                     49,778,611
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            49,778,611
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               40,394,191
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,384,420
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,941,622
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,442,798
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,442,798
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .82


</TABLE>
Filed  #C20499-98
January  5,  2001
In  the  office  of
Dean  Heller
Secretary  of  State

                       CERTIFICATE OF REVERSE STOCK SPLIT
                                       FOR
                        FETCHOMATIC GLOBAL INTERNET INC.

The  undersigned  President and Secretary of FETCHOMATIC GLOBAL INTERNET INC., a
Nevada  corporation  (the  "Corporation"),  hereby  certify  for the purposes of
Nevada  Revised  Statute  78.209  as  follows:

1.     The  Board  of  Directors of the Corporation has unanimously approved, by
written  consent,  dated  December 14, 2000, a six (6) for one (1) reverse stock
split  (the  "Reverse  Stock Split") of the Corporation's authorized, issued and
outstanding  common  stock.

2.     The  total  authorized  number  of  shares  of the Corporation before the
effective  date of the Reverse Stock Split was Two Hundred Million (200,000,000)
shares  of  common  stock  with  a  par  value  of  $0.001.

3.     The  total  authorized  number  of shares after the effective date of the
Reverse  Stock  Split  shall  be Thirty Three Million Three Hundred Thirty Three
Thousand  Three  Hundred  Thirty Four (33,333,334) shares of common stock with a
par  value  of  $0.001.

4.     The Corporation shall issue one (1) share of common stock in exchange for
every six (6) shares of common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to
the  effective  date  of  the  Reverse  Stock  Split.

5.     Stockholders  who would otherwise be entitled to a fractional share shall
be  issued  an  additional  fraction  of  a  share as is necessary to increase a
fractional  share  to  a  full  share.

6.     The  approval  of  the stockholders of the Corporation is not required to
effect  the  Reverse  Stock  Split.

7.     The  Reverse  Stock  Split  shall  be  effective  on  the  date that this
Certificate  is  filed  with  the  Nevada  Secretary  of  State.

Dated  this  5th  day  of  January,  2001.


/s/  Jeffrey  D.  Welsh                 /s/  Lindsay  Lent
JEFFREY  D.  WELSH,  President          LINDSAY  LENT,  Secretary

This  instrument  was  acknowledged  before me on January 5, 2001, by JEFFREY D.
WELSH,  known  or  proved  to  be  the  person  executing  the above instrument.

/s/  Sharon  L.  Faulkner
Notary  Public

This  instrument was acknowledged before me on January 5, 2001, by LINDSAY LENT,
known  or  proved  to  be  the  person  executing  the  above  instrument.

/s/  Terry  D.  Millichamp
Notary  Public
**Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 July 2011 – Djédjé v Council**

**(Case T-351/11)**

Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire – Action for annulment – Time-limit for bringing an action – Out of time – Clear inadmissibility

1.                     *Actions for annulment – Time-limits – Matter of public policy – Examination by the EU judicature of its own motion (Art. 263,
sixth para., TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 102(1) and (2)) (see paras 9-10)*

2.                     *Actions for annulment – Time-limits – Starting point – Publication date of the measure in question (Arts 263, fourth and sixth
paras, TFEU and 275, second para., TFEU; Council Regulation No 560/2005; Council Decision 2010/656) (see para. 14)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for annulment, first, of Council Decision 2011/221/CFSP of 6 April 2011 amending Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 93, p. 20), and, secondly, of Council Regulation (EU) No 330/2011 of 6 April 2011 amending Regulation No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 93, p. 10), in so far as they concern the applicant. |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The action is dismissed. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Mr Alcide Djédjé is ordered to bear his own costs. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for accelerated procedure and priority judgment. |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-02-2000
<CASH>                                           6,221
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  107,105
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    116,904
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               240,608
<PP&E>                                          36,186
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 370,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          161,564
<BONDS>                                        173,399
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           51,809
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (82,079)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   370,483
<SALES>                                        308,986
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               308,986
<CGS>                                          233,503
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  233,503
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,582
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (603)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,540
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,143)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (8,206)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13,349)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (219.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (219.52)



</TABLE>
# C_2019044EN.01004901.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/49

---

Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — Wagon Automotive Nagold v Commission

(Case T-610/11) (1)

((State aid - German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying losses forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market - Annulment of the contested measure by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2019/C 44/62)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Wagon Automotive Nagold GmbH (Nagold, Germany) (represented by: initially, T. Hackemann and H. Horstkotte, then, T. Hackemann and F. von Bredow, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Adam, then R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially T. Henze, K. Petersen and R. Kanitz, then, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and K. Stranz and finally, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and S. Eisenberg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel) (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 26).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

| 2. | The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by Wagon Automotive Nagold GmbH; |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by Wagon Automotive Nagold GmbH;

| 3. | The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.

---
§ 175.124 Requirements for DUKW Amphibious Passenger Vessels. No later than January 9, 2024, all operators of a DUKW amphibious passenger vessel, as defined in 46 CFR 175.400, must: ( a ) Modify the DUKW amphibious passenger vessel to either: ( 1 ) Remove the canopies and any window coverings installed for waterborne operations, and require that all passengers wear a lifejacket approved by the Coast Guard, as described in part 180 of this subchapter, before the onset of waterborne operations of the DUKW amphibious passenger vessel; or
( 2 ) Install a canopy that does not restrict horizontal or vertical escape by passengers in the event of flooding or sinking.
( b ) Reengineer the DUKW amphibious passenger vessel to permanently close all unnecessary access plugs and reduce all through-hull penetrations to the minimum number and size necessary for the safe operation or maintenance of the DUKW amphibious passenger vessel.
( c ) Install an independently powered electric bilge pump(s) with a minimum total pumping capacity of: GPM = 3600 × A × √H Where— GPM = The minimum total pumping capacity in gallons per minute. A = The area (in square feet) of the largest hull penetration below a line drawn parallel to and at least 6 inches (150 millimeters) above the deepest load waterline. √H = The square root of the vertical distance in feet from the center of the penetration to the deepest load waterline.
( d ) Install in the DUKW amphibious passenger vessel not fewer than 4 independently powered bilge alarms.
( e ) Conduct an in-water inspection of the DUKW amphibious passenger vessel after each time a through-hull penetration of such vessel has been removed or uncovered.
( f ) Verify through an in-water inspection the watertight integrity of the DUKW amphibious passenger vessel at the outset of each waterborne departure of such vessel.
( g ) Install within the passenger compartment LED lights capable of operating underwater that activate automatically to aid with emergency egress.
[USCG-2023-0243, 88 FR 62301, Sept. 11, 2023]
Exhibit 31.1

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Daniel S. Mckinney, certify that:

```
 
```

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Asia Properties, Inc.

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

 

4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

 

c.  Presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

 

5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.  All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls that could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

 

6.  I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 

 

Date:  February 17, 2005                                                By:                                                                               

Daniel S. Mckinney, President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Director (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)