alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Communications Commission
 The following item has been deleted from the list of Agenda items scheduled for consideration at the Friday, November 3, 2006, Open Meeting. 4
Wireline Competition
*Title:*
                             AT&T Inc. and BellSouth Corporation Application for Transfer of Control (WC Docket No. 06-74).*Summary:*
                             The Commission will consider a Memorandum Opinion and Order regarding the transfer of control application of AT&T and BellSouth.
 Federal Communications Commission. William F. Canton, Deputy Secretary.


[FR Doc. 06-9114 Filed 11-3-06; 10:58 am] BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, *Defendants in Error, v.*Thomas Swan, *Plaintiff in Error*.

Conviction and judg^ ment reversed, and new trial ordered in the Court of Sessions of Ontario county, and proceedings remitted to that court. Opinion by

Hardin, J.
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Declan A. French, Chief Executive Officer of Thinkpath Inc., certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Thinkpath Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this quarterly report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
      material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
      flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      quarterly report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we
      have:

            a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;

            b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
      controls and procedures as of a date within 45 days prior to the filing
      date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

            c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
      our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
      committee of the registrant's board of directors:

            a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
      internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
      record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified
      for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal
      controls; and

            b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls.


Date: November 22, 2004                         /s/ Declan French
                                                -----------------------
                                                Declan A. French
                                                Chief Executive Officer
§ 175.110 General applicability. ( a ) Except as in paragraph (b) of this section, this subchapter applies to each vessel of less than 100 gross tons that carries 150 or less passengers, or has overnight accommodations for 49 or less passengers, and that— ( 1 ) Carries more than six passengers, including at least one for hire;
( 2 ) Is chartered with a crew provided or specified by the owner or the owner's representative and is carrying more than six passengers;
( 3 ) Is chartered with no crew provided or specified by the owner or the owner's representative and is carrying more than 12 passengers; or
( 4 ) If a submersible vessel, carries at least one passenger for hire; or
( 5 ) Is a ferry carrying more than six passengers. Note to paragraph ( a
):
For a vessel of less than 100 gross tons that carries more than 150 passengers or has overnight accommodations for more than 49 passengers, see subchapter K of this chapter.
( b ) This subchapter does not apply to: ( 1 ) A vessel operating exclusively on inland waters that are not navigable waters of the United States;
( 2 ) An oceanographic research vessel;
( 3 ) A boat forming part of a vessel's lifesaving equipment and that is not used for carrying passengers except in emergencies or during emergency drills;
( 4 ) A vessel of a foreign country that is a party to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as amended (SOLAS), to which the United States Government is currently a party, and that has on board a current valid SOLAS Passenger Ship Safety Certificate; or
( 5 ) A vessel of a foreign country, whose government has inspection laws approximating those of the United States and that by its laws accords similar privileges to vessels of the United States, which has on board a current valid certificate of inspection, permitting the carrying of passengers, issued by its government.
( c ) Irrespective of build date, a vessel to which this subchapter applies must meet 46 CFR 181.405, 181.450, 181.500, 185.364, and 185.420(b), if it is not a ferry, and if it— ( 1 ) Has overnight accommodations for passengers; or
( 2 ) Is operating on a Coastwise or Oceans route.
( d ) Irrespective of build date, a vessel to which this subchapter applies must meet 46 CFR 177.115(c), 177.500(n), 185.410(b), 185.507, and 185.515, if it is not a ferry and has overnight accommodations for passengers.
( e ) The requirements outlined in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section must be met no later than March 28, 2022, except for: ( 1 ) The requirements to implement 46 CFR 181.405, 181.450, and 181.500, which must be met no later than December 27, 2022; and
( 2 ) The requirements to implement 46 CFR 177.115(c) and 177.500(n), which must be met no later than December 27, 2023.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 947, Jan. 10, 1996; 61 FR 20557, May 7, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51355, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2008-1107, 74 FR 63664, Dec. 4, 2009; USCG-2021-0306, 86 FR 73172, Dec. 27, 2021]
44612906.2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

HEALTH ALLIANCE PLAN OF 

MICHIGAN, HAP PREFERRED, 

INCORPORATED, and ALLIANCE 

HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF 

MICHIGAN MUTUAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY, a 

Michigan nonprofit mutual insurance 

company, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-13788 

Judge: Hon. Denise Page Hood 

Magistrate Judge: Hon. David R. 

Grand 

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND 

RETENTION OF JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT 

Upon stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above 

matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs and attorney 

fees, except as otherwise stated in the confidential Settlement Agreement. 

This is a final order and closes the case; the Court, however, retains 

jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement. 

SO ORDERED, this day of , 2022. 

Case 2:14-cv-13788-DPH-DRG ECF No. 555, PageID.53811 Filed 08/25/22 Page 1 of 2
44612906.2 

____________________________ 

HON. Denise Page Hood 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Stipulated to and approved by: 

HONIGMAN LLP 

/s/ David A. Ettinger 

David A. Ettinger (P26537) 

660 Woodward Avenue 

2290 First National Bldg. 

Detroit, MI 48226 

(313) 465-7368 

dettinger@honigman.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Dated: August 25, 2022 

BODMAN PLC 

/s/ Thomas J. Rheaume, Jr. 

Thomas J. Rheaume, Jr. (P74422) 

6th Floor at Ford Field 

1901 St. Antoine St. 

Detroit, MI 48226 

(313) 259-7777 

trheaume@bodmanlaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Case 2:14-cv-13788-DPH-DRG ECF No. 555, PageID.53812 Filed 08/25/22 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Robert D. Parks, the Chief Executive Officer of Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                               





|    | /s/ ROBERT D. PARKS    
|--- | -----------------------
|    |                        
|By: | Robert D. Parks        
|    | Chief Executive Officer
|    | Date: August 7, 2004
Submitted on record and briefs January 17,

reversed and remanded for reconsideration February 7, 1996

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Walter C. Windom, Claimant. Walter C. WINDOM, *Petitioner, v.*DODGE LOGGING and SAIF Corporation, *Respondents.*

(WCB 93-05126; CA A85288)

910 P2d 1175

Floyd H. Shebley filed the brief for petitioner.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Julene M. Quinn, Special Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondents.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Haselton, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*131PER CURIAM

Petitioner argues that the Workers’ Compensation Board erred in holding that he was ineligible for vocational assistance because his claim was in “own motion” status. The statute pertinent to his petition, ORS 656.278, has been amended by Oregon Laws 1995, chapter 332. Because the amended version of the statute is applicable, we reverse and remand for reconsideration in the light of the new law. *Volk v. America West Airlines,*135 Or App 565, 899 P2d 746 (1995).

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.467 Submission of insulation information. The following insulation information must be submitted for special approval by the Commandant (CG-ENG): ( a ) Compatibility with the cargo.
( b ) Solubility in the cargo.
( c ) Absorption of the cargo.
( d ) Shrinkage.
( e ) Aging.
( f ) Closed cell content.
( g ) Density.
( h ) Mechanical properties.
( i ) Thermal expansion.
( j ) Abrasion.
( k ) Cohesion.
( l ) Thermal conductivity.
( m ) Resistance to vibrations.
( n ) Resistance to fire and flame spread.
( o ) The manufacturing and installation details of the insulation including: ( 1 ) Fabrication;
( 2 ) Storage;
( 3 ) Handling;
( 4 ) Erection; and
( 5 ) Quality control.
[CGD 74-289, 44 FR 26009, May 3, 1979, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4782, Feb. 3, 1983]
# C_2013377EN.01001201.xml

| 21.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 377/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 377/12

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 November 2013 — Europol v Kalmár

(Case T-455/11) (1)

1

(Appeal - Civil service - Europol staff - Fixed-term contracts - Dismissal - Statement of reasons - Rights of the defence - Financial compensation)

2013/C 377/27

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Police Office (Europol) (represented by: D. Neumann, D. El Khoury and J. Arnould, acting as Agents, and D. Waelbroeck and E. Antypas, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Andreas Kalmár (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: D. Coppens, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 26 May 2011 in Case F-83/09 Kalmár v Europol, not yet published in the ECR, and seeking to have that judgment set aside in part.

Kalmár

Europol

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the European Police Office (Europol) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Andreas Kalmár in the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Police Office (Europol) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mr Andreas Kalmár in the present proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 290, 1.10.2011.

1

---
§ 172.110 Survival conditions. ( a ) Paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section apply to a hopper barge and paragraphs (e) through (i) apply to all other tank barges.
( b ) A barge is presumed to survive assumed damage if it meets the following conditions in the final stage of flooding:
( c ) A hopper barge must not heel or trim beyond the angle at which— ( 1 ) The deck edge is first submerged; or
( 2 ) If the barge has a coaming that is at least 36 inches (91.5 centimeters) in height, the intersection of the deck and the coaming is first submerged, except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section.
( d ) A hopper barge must not heel beyond the angle at which the deck edge is first submerged by more than “fa” as defined in § 172.090(c).
( e ) Except as provided in paragraphs (h) and (i) of this section, each tank barge must not heel beyond the angle at which— ( 1 ) The deck edge is first submerged; or
( 2 ) If the barge has one or more watertight trunks, the deck edge is first submerged by more than “fa” as defined in § 172.090(c).
( f ) Except as provided in paragraphs (h) and (i) of this section, a tank barge must not trim beyond the angle at which— ( 1 ) The deck edge is first submerged; or
( 2 ) If the barge has one or more watertight trunks, the intersection of the deck and the trunk is first submerged.
( g ) If a tank barge experiences simultaneous heel and trim, the trim requirements in paragraph (f) of this section apply only at the centerline.
( h ) Except as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, in no case may any part of the actual cargo tank top be underwater in the final condition of equilibrium.
( i ) If a barge has a “step-down” in hull depth on either or both ends and all cargo tank openings are located on the higher deck level, the deck edge and tank top in the stepped-down area may be submerged.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Ronald W. Kisling, Chief Financial Officer of Saba Software, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certify, as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adoptingthe signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request. 

 

This Certification has not been, and shall not bedeemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

 

Date:October 15, 2003
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.072-5 Accelerated weathering test. ( a ) Condition the flag, folded to 1 ⁄ 16th its size or as packaged, whichever is smaller, by submersion in 5% by weight sodium chloride solution for 2 hours followed immediately by storage at 95% (±5) related humidity and 40 °C (±3°) (100 °F ±5°) for at least 15 days.
( b ) Unfold and suspend flag by the lines provided, secured through each grommet.
( c ) Subject the flag to alternate 3 minute cycles of 5% by weight sodium chloride solution at 55 degrees (±5°) C and air blasts of 40 knots at 55 degrees (±5°) C, perpendicular to and over the entire surface of one side of the flag, without interruption for a period of not less than 24 hours.
( d ) The flag fails the accelerated weathering test if ( 1 ) After conditioning, the flag cannot be unfolded without damage,
( 2 ) There is any tearing,
( 3 ) The flag does not retain its bright red/orange color,
( 4 ) The disc and square images no longer meet the requirements of § 160.072-3(a)(3) or,
( 5 ) There is any visible rot over more than 3% of the flag's surface.
#### § 169.249 Pressure vessels.

Pressure vessels must meet the requirements of part 54 of this chapter. The inspection procedures for pressure vessels are contained in subpart 61.10 of this chapter.
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.809 Procedures for having the Coast Guard examine a vessel for a Certificate of Compliance. The owner of a foreign flag vessel wishing to have the Coast Guard conduct a Certificate of Compliance examination, as required by § 153.808, must proceed as follows: ( a ) Notify the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection of the port where the vessel is to be inspected at least 7 days before the vessel arrives and arrange the exact time and other details of the examination. This notification is in addition to any other pre-arrival notice to the Coast Guard required by other regulations, but may be concurrent with the endorsement application in § 153.9, and must include— ( 1 ) The name of the vessel's first U.S. port of call;
( 2 ) The date that the vessel is scheduled to arrive;
( 3 ) The name and telephone number of the owner's local agent; and
( 4 ) The names of all cargoes listed in table 1 of this part that are on board the vessel.
( b ) Before the examination required by § 153.808 is begun, make certain that the following plans are on board the vessel and available to the Marine Inspector. These plans include— ( 1 ) A general arrangement (including the location of fire fighting, safety, and lifesaving gear);
( 2 ) A capacity plan;
( 3 ) A schematic diagram of cargo piping on deck and in tanks (including the location of all valves and pumps); and
( 4 ) A schematic diagram of cargo tank vent piping (including the location of relief valves and flame screens).
[CGD 95-027, 61 FR 26009, May 23, 1996]
**EXHIBIT ITEM32.1**

 

SECTION 906CERTIFICATION

 

The certification set forth below is beingsubmitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose ofcomplying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode.

 

March23, 2006

 

CharlesT. Chrietzberg, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of Northern CaliforniaBancorp, Inc. certifies:

 

a.               that thisperiodic report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b.              thatinformation contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of NorthernCalifornia Bancorp, Inc..

 

 
|   | /s/ Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr. |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|   | Charles T. Chrietzberg, Jr.     |
|   | Chief Executive Officer         |
|   | and President                   |

 

----
§ 111.05-3 Design, construction, and installation; general. ( a ) An electric apparatus must be designed, constructed, and installed to prevent any person from accidentally contacting energized parts.
( b ) Exposed, noncurrent-carrying metal parts of fixed equipment that may become energized because of any condition must be grounded.
( c ) In a grounded distribution system, only grounded, three-prong appliances may be used. Adaptors that allow an ungrounded, two-prong appliance to fit into a grounded, three-prong, receptacle must not be used. This does not apply to double-insulated appliances or tools and low voltage appliances of 50 volts or less.
( d ) If the installation of the electrical equipment does not ensure a positive ground to the metal hull or equivalent conducting body, the apparatus must be grounded to the hull with a grounding conductor.
[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15236, Apr. 8, 1982, as amended by USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16360, Mar. 16, 2023]
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                  REPORT AND CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
The Board of Directors
Siebel Systems, Inc.
 
  The audits referred to in our report dated January 21, 1998, except as to
Note 8 which is as of March 2, 1998, included the related financial statement
schedule as of December 31, 1997, and for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1997. The financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on the financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our
opinion, the financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the
basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in
all material respects the information set forth therein.
 
  We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-07983, 333-22763, and 333-40437) on Form S-8 of Siebel Systems, Inc.
and (Nos. 333-36967 and 333-40259) on Form S-3 of Siebel Systems, Inc. of our
reports dated January 21, 1998, except as to Note 8 which is as of March 2,
1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Siebel Systems, Inc. and
subsidiary as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, and related schedule,
which reports appear in the December 31, 1997, annual report on Form 10-K of
Siebel Systems, Inc.
 
                                              /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
San Jose, California
March 13, 1998