MODIFY and AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed May 26, 2015.

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 1 4 - 00 877 - CR No. 05 - 14 - 00878 - CR No. 05 - 14 - 00879 - CR No. 05 - 14 - 00880 - CR REGINALD KEITH PINK , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial Distri ct Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F 0 9 - 55346 - T, F13 - 60732 - T, F13 - 60733 - T, F13 - 72123 - T 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Lang

- Miers, and Whitehill Opinion b y Justic e Lang

- Miers Reginal d Keith Pink appeals his convictions for robbery, two aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon offenses , and one aggravated assault on a public servant offense
. See T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . § § 22.02(a) (2) , 29.02(a) (2) , 29.03(a) (2) (West 2011) . The trial cour t assessed punishment , enhanced by two prior felony convictions, at life imprisonment in each case. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements o f Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there- 2
- are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 811

– 12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Couns el delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

– 21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts
a nd counsel in Anders cases). Appellant did , however, file several pro se motions. We have reviewed the record , counsel’s brief , and appellant’s pro se motions
. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 82 6

– 2 7 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate cou rt’s duty in Anders cases)
. We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal s . Although not an arguable issue, we note the judgments in cause nos. 05

- 14

- 00877

- CR and 05

- 14

- 00879

- CR do not correctly reflect appellant’s pleas to , nor the trial court’s findings
on , the enhancement paragraphs. In each case, appellant pleaded true to two enhancement paragraphs alleging prior felony convictions, and the trial court found the enhancement paragraphs true. The judgment adjudicating guilt in cause no. 05

- 14

- 00877

- CR contains no reference to the enhancement paragraphs and the judgment in cause no. 05

- 14

- 00879

- CR states “N/A” in the sections regarding the first enhancement paragraph. As a res ult, the judgments are incorrect. Accordingly, w e modify the judgment adjudicating guilt in cause no. 05

- 14

- 00877

- CR to show that appellant plea ded true to the first and second enhancement paragraphs and the trial court found the paragraphs are true. We modify the trial court’s judgment in cause no. 05

- 14

- 00879

- CR to show appellant pleaded true to the first enhancement paragraph and the trial court found the paragraph true. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. State , 865 S.W.2d 26, 27

– 28 (Tex. Crim. Ap p. 1993); Asberry v. State , 813 S.W.2d 526, 529

– 30 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 1991, pet. ref'd).- 3
- In cause nos. 05

- 14

- 00878

- CR and 05

- 14

- 00880

- CR, we affirm the trial court’s judgments. In cause nos. 05

- 14

- 00877

- CR and 05

- 14

- 00879

- CR, we affirm the trial court’s ju dgments as modified.

Do Not Publish T EX . R. A PP . P. 47 140877F.U05 /Elizabeth Lang

- Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE- 4
- 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
JUDGMENT
REGINALD KEITH PINK , Appellant No. 05

- 14

- 00877

- CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F09

- 55346

- T). Opinion delivered by Justice Lang

- Miers, Justices Francis and Whitehill participating.
Based on the Court’s opini on of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is MODIFIED as follows: Add section “Plea to 1st Enhancement Paragraph: True.” Add section “Plea to 2nd Enhancement /Habitual Paragraph: True.” Add section “Findings on 1st Enhancement Paragrap h: True.” Add section “Findings on 2nd Enhancement/Habitual Paragraph: True.” As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt.
Judgment entered May 26, 2015.- 5
- 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
JUDGMENT
REGIN ALD KEITH PINK , Appellant No. 05

- 14

- 00878

- CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F13

- 60732

- T). Opinion delivered by Justice Lang

- Miers, Justices Francis and Whitehil l participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED
. Judgment entered May 26, 2015.- 6
- 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
JUDGMENT
REGINALD KEITH PINK , Appellant No. 05

- 14

- 00879

- CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F13

- 60733

- T). Opinion delivered by Justice Lang

- Miers, Justices Francis and Whitehill participating.
Based on the Court’s op inion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is MODIFIED as follows: The section entitled “Plea to 1st Enhancement Paragraph” is modified to show “True.” The section entitled “Findings on 1st Enhancement Paragraph” is modified to show “True.” As modifie d, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment.
Judgment entered May 26, 2015.- 7
- 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
JUDGMENT
REGINALD KEITH PINK , Appellant No. 05

- 14

- 00880

- CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F13

- 72123

- T). Opinion delivered by Justice Lang

- Miers, Justices Francis and Whitehill participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED
.
Ju dgment entered May 26, 2015.