alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Kelly L. Hankinson, Chief Financial Officer of Thinkpath Inc., certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Thinkpath Inc.;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
         untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
         necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
         under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
         the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
         information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
         material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
         cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
         this quarterly report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
         establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
         defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
         we have:

                  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
         that material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
         is being prepared;

                  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
         controls and procedures as of a date within 45 days prior to the filing
         date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

                  c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
         the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
         our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
         on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
         audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

                  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
         internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability
         to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

                  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
         management or other employees who have a significant role in the
         registrant's internal controls.


Date: August 23, 2004
                                                  /S/ KELLY HANKINSON
                                                  Kelly L. Hankinson
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001070680
<NAME> GRAND CENTRAL FINANCIAL CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           5,066
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      3,716
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          39,852
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            37,490
<LOANS>                                         76,444
<ALLOWANCE>                                        371
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,476
<DEPOSITS>                                      78,587
<SHORT-TERM>                                       424
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                584
<LONG-TERM>                                     39,386
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,476
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 137,476
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,479
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  824
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   147
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,450
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 759
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,255
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,195
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   6
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,394
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (123)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       (123)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (81)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.43
<LOANS-NON>                                        103
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   369
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  371
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               371
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            110


</TABLE>
# C_2018042EN.01002402.xml

| 5.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/24

---

Order of the General Court of 28 November 2017 — Staelen v Ombudsman

(Case T-217/11 REV) (1)

1

((Non-contractual liability - Application for revision - Consequences of a subsequent judgment of the Court of Justice partially setting aside a judgment of the General Court - No new facts - Inadmissibility))

(2018/C 042/35)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Claire Staelen (Bridel, Luxembourg) (represented by: V. Olona, lawyer)

Applicant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Ombudsman (represented by: initially G. Grill, then L. Papadias, acting as Agents, and A. Duron and D. Waelbroeck, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Application for revision of the judgment of 29 April 2015, Staelen v Ombudsman (T-217/11, EU:T:2015:238)

Staelen

Ombudsman

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for revision is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for revision is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Ms Claire Staelen is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Claire Staelen is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 204, 9.7.2011.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 76 (Friday, April 20, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 19781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2004]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 76 / Friday, April 20, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 19781]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2007-16 of April 11, 
                2007

                
Presidential Determination on Waiver and 
                Certification of Statutory Provisions Regarding the 
                Palestine Liberation Organization Office

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to the authority and conditions contained in 
                section 534(d) of the Foreign Operations, Export 
                Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 
                2006, Public Law 109-102, as carried forward by the 
                Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, 
                Public Law 110-5, I hereby determine and certify that 
                it is important to the national security interests of 
                the United States to waive the provisions of section 
                1003 of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1987, Public Law 100-
                204.

                This waiver shall be effective for a period of 6 months 
                from the date hereof. You are hereby authorized and 
                directed to transmit this determination to the Congress 
                and to publish it in the Federal Register. 
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, April 11, 2007.

[FR Doc. 07-2004
Filed 4-19-07; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 79 (Wednesday, April 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2043]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Missile Defense Advisory Committee (MDAC)

AGENCY: Department of Defense; Missile Defense Agency (MDA).

ACTION:  Notice of closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Missile Defense Advisory Committee will meet in closed 
session on June 12-13, 2007, in Washington, DC.
    The mission of the Missile Defense Advisory Committee is to provide 
the Department of Defense advice on all matters relating to missile 
defense, including system development, technology, program maturity and 
readiness of configurations of the Ballistic Missile Defense System 
(BMDS) to enter the acquisition process. At this meeting, the Committee 
will receive classified briefings by intelligence officials concerning 
estimated future developments, as well as develop recommendations to be 
briefed to the Director, Missile Defense Agency.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: COL David R. Wolf, Designated Federal 
Official (DFO) at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3f5b5e49565b11485053597f525b5e11525653"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c2a6a3b4aba6ecb5adaea482afa6a3ecafabae">[email protected]</span></a>, phone/voice mail (703) 695-6438, 
or mail at 7100 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-7100.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with Section 10(d) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. 
App. II), it has been determined that this Missile Defense Advisory 
Committee meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and 
that, accordingly, the meeting will be closed to the public.

    Dated: April 18, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Office, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-2043 Filed 4-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

FRANCIS THOMAS, 

Plaintiff, 

 -vs- Case No. 5:15-CV-10783 

Hon. John Corbett O'Meara 

Magistrate Judge: Anthony P. Patti 

ANDY AUTO SALES, INC., et al.

Defendants. 

STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Having been advised by the parties that they have reached an agreement to 

settle the above-captioned matter and upon the stipulation of the parties; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint be dismissed as to all 

Defendants, with prejudice, and without costs to any party; and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the court shall retain jurisdiction only for 

the purpose of enforcing the settlement of this matter. 

Date: July 17, 2015 s/John Corbett O’Meara 

 United States District Judge 

Stipulated To By: 

5:15-cv-10783-JCO-APP Doc # 22 Filed 07/17/15 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 116
/s/ Carl Schwartz 

Carl Schwartz (P-70335) 

Attorney for Francis Thomas 

24500 Northwestern Highway, Ste. 206

Southfield, MI 48075 

(248) 208-8864 

Carl@MichiganConsumerLaw.Com 

 

/s/ Dalia R. Kejbou (w/consent) 

Dalia R. Kejbou (P-63428) 

Attorney for Defendants 

74 West Long Lake Rd., Ste. 203 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304 

(248) 646-1711 

kejboulaw@gmail.com 

 

Dated: July 17, 2015 

 

5:15-cv-10783-JCO-APP Doc # 22 Filed 07/17/15 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 117
Certificate of Service

 I, Carl Schwartz, hereby certify that this document, filed through the 

“Utilities” tab of the CM/ECF system, will be e-mailed to the following counsel of 

record: 

Dalia R. Kejbou, Esq. 

74 West Long Lake Rd., Ste. 203 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304 

(248) 646-1711 

kejboulaw@gmail.com 

 Respectfully Submitted, 

 LYNGKLIP & ASSOCIATES 

CONSUMER LAW CENTER, PLC 

 By: /s/ Carl Schwartz 

 Carl Schwartz (P-70335) 

 Attorney for Francis Thomas 

 24500 Northwestern Highway, Suite 206 

 Southfield, Michigan 48075 

 (248) 208-8864 

 Carl@MichiganConsumerLaw.Com 

Dated: June 3, 2015 

5:15-cv-10783-JCO-APP Doc # 22 Filed 07/17/15 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 118
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-K FILING.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,224
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,497
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,545
<INVENTORY>                                         48
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,369
<PP&E>                                           5,295
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,064
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,557
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,576
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,140
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,557
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,721
<CGS>                                            8,572
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,487
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    793
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                793
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       793
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06


</TABLE>
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Central Federal Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date:      May 14, 2008
    /s/ Therese Ann LiutkusTherese Ann Liutkus, CPATreasurer and Chief Financial Officer
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00071

- CR

VICTOR HAMILTON

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 361st District Court of Brazos County , Texas Trial Cause No. 09

- 02517

- CRF

- 361

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. August 7, 2014.
Skip to contents
 next Previous
 Next next
 Main Menu
 Office of Inspector General Activities
 The Board of Governors' Office of Inspector General
(OIG) functions in accordance with the Inspector General Act of 1978,
as amended. In addition to retaining an independent auditor each year
to audit the Board's financial statements, the OIG plans and conducts
audits, reviews, and investigations relating to the Board's programs
and operations and its delegated functions at the Federal Reserve
Banks. The OIG also reviews existing and proposed legislation and
regulations for their impact on the economy and efficiency of the
Board's programs and operations. It recommends policies, and it
supervises and conducts activities to promote economy and efficiency
and to prevent and detect waste, fraud, and abuse in Board and
Board-delegated programs and operations, as well as in activities
administered or financed by the Board. The OIG keeps the Congress and
the Chairman of the Board of Governors fully informed about serious
abuses and deficiencies and about the status of any corrective actions. During 2006, the OIG completed eight audits, reviews, and other
assessments and conducted a number of follow-up reviews to evaluate
action taken on earlier recommendations. The OIG also closed eight
investigations and performed numerous legislative and regulatory
reviews. OIG Audits, Reviews, and Assessments Completed during 2006
        Report title
          Month issuedExternal Quality Control
Review of the National Science Foundation Inspector General
  Audit
Organization
          FebruaryAudit of the FFIEC's
Financial Statements (Year Ended December 31,
2005)
          MarchInspection of the Board's Security
Services Unit
          MarchAudit of the Board's
Implementation of Electronic Authentication
Requirements
          MarchAudit of the Board's
Financial Statements (Year Ended December 31,
2005)
          MayAudit of the Board's Information
Security Program
          SeptemberSecurity
Control Review of the Common Document and Text Repository System (Internal Report)
          OctoberAudit of the
Board's Payroll Process
          December
 Return to top
 Home Reports to the Congress  Accessibility Contact us
NUMBER 13-09-00379-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

BRANDON MATT MCREYNOLDS, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 

of Victoria County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Brandon Matt McReynolds, was convicted of driving while intoxicated.

On June 20, 2008, appellant filed a notice of appeal by and through his attorney. On

February 11, 2010, this Court abated the appeal because no appellate brief had been filed,

ordered the trial court to determine whether appellant desired to prosecute this appeal and

instructed the trial court to make findings as to whether the appellant had abandoned his

appeal.
2

Based on the trial court hearing, the trial court judge recommends that the appeal

be dismissed. The trial court found that appellant is not represented by counsel, does not

want appointed counsel and does not want to pursue his appeal.

Although no written motion has been filed in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, based upon the appellant’s testimony at the hearing

that he does not want to continue his appeal, we conclude that good cause exists to

suspend the operation of Rule 42.2(a) in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2. Accordingly,

we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed the

25th day of March, 2010.