alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 84 (Wednesday, May 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 24321]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2145]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Advisory Child Health and Human Development Council.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The intramural programs and projects and the 
discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the intramural programs and 
projects, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Advisory Child Health and Human 
Development Council; NACHHD Subcommittee on Planning and Policy.
    Date: May 11, 2007.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate the Division of Intramural 
Research site visit reports.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 31, 31 Center 
Drive, Room 2A48, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Susanne Strickland, Acting Deputy Director for 
Science Policy, Analysis & Communication, NICHD/NIH/DHHS, 31 Center 
Drive, Suite 2A-18, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-3440.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the Executive 
Secretary's need for confirmation from subcommittee members on their 
availability to participate in this meeting.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www.nichd.nih.gov/about/nachhd.htm, where an agenda and 
any additional information for the meeting will be posed when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 24, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2145 Filed 5-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00071-CR

VICTOR HAMILTON

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

361st District Court of Brazos County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 09-02517-CRF-361

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 7, 2014.
### NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1113 TOTES-ISOTONER CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in case no. 07-0001, Chief Judge Jane A. Restani, Judge Donald C. Pogue, and Judge Judith M. Barzilay. ON MOTION Before MOORE Circuit Judge. ORDER Wolff Shoe moves for leave to file a brief amicus curiae and to participate at oral argument. The United States opposes. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) Wolff Shoe's motion for leave to file a brief amicus curiae is granted.(2) Wolff Shoe's motion to participate in oral argument is denied without

prejudice to renewal. FOR THE COURT 

# APR 2 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date
cc: Curtis W. Knauss, Esq. John M. Peterson, Esq. Reginald T. Blades, Jr., Esq. s20 Jan Horbaly Clerk 

### FILED eOURT OF APPEA Ft/ THE FEDERAL C IRCUIT " APR 0 2 2009 JRN aUtiona CLERK

2009-1113 2
#### FLORENCE STRUENING, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC., PLAINTIFF, v. WENDELIN NAGEL ET UX., DEFENDANTS.

Argued January 18, 1929

Decided January 30, 1929.

Before Justices Mintukn, Black and Campbell.

Eor the plaintiff, *Palmer & Cooper.*

Eor the defendants, *Heine & Laird.*

*154Per Curiam.

This suit was brought to recover damages under the Death act. The plaintiff’s intestate, Joseph E. Herold, on September 9th, 1927, was riding a bicycle northerly along Center street, approaching Irving avenue, in the town of South Orange, Few Jersey. He was struck by the defendant Wendelin Nagel, who was operating an automobile in a northerly direction, along Center street approaching Irving avenue, causing the injuries from which he died. The trial resulted in a verdict for the defendants, hence, a rule to show cause was allowed on behalf of the plaintiff. There are four reasons alleged for the granting of a new trial; first and second, error by the trial court in refusing to charge the plaintiff’s seventh and tenth requests to charge; third and fourth, the verdict of the jury is contrary to, and against the weight of the evidence. As we read the record none of these reasons are tenable. The record presents simply questions of fact. There is evidence on which the jury could and did base their verdict. The sharp question in the case is did the plaintiff’s intestate, while riding on the bicycle ahead of the defendant’s automobile, along Center street, turn sharply to his left in front of the defendants’ moving automobile ? Eeeord, page 60.

We find no sufficient reason for disturbing the verdict of the jury, the rule to show cause is, therefore, discharged.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,382,418
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               750,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 14,264,819
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         944,986
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           948,052
<LOANS>                                     17,195,468
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (170,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,611,385
<DEPOSITS>                                  30,111,208
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            139,764
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,395,240
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,965,173
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              36,611,385
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                743,963
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              391,393
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                66,444
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,201,800
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             428,696
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             429,623
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          772,177
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  171,075
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (662)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,083,127
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (428,184)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    (428,184)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (273,739)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.40)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.80
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,075
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              170,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           170,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Quality-assurance data forroutine water analyses by the U.S. Geological Survey Laboratory in Troy, NewYork [electronic resource].**
 
1991-93 | 1993-95| 1995-97 | 1997-99 | 1999-01 | 2001-03 | 2003-05 | 2005-07
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.76/5:
Item Number:0624-H-05 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000733497
 
January 16, 2020
# National Day of Prayer, 2007

A prayerful spirit has always been an important part of our national character, and it is a force that has guided the American people, given us strength, and sustained us in moments of joy and in times of challenge. On this National Day of Prayer, we acknowledge God's grace and ask for His continued guidance in the life of our Nation. 

Americans of many faiths and traditions share a common belief that God hears the prayers of His children and shows grace to those who seek Him. Following the tragedy at Virginia Tech, in towns all across America, in houses of worship from every faith, Americans have joined together to pray for the lives that were lost and for their families, friends, and loved ones. We hold the victims in our hearts and pray for those who suffer and grieve. There is a power in these prayers, and we can find comfort in the grace and guidance of a loving God. 

At this important time in our history, we also pray for the brave members of our Armed Forces and their families. We pray for their safety, for the recovery of the wounded, and for the peace we all seek. 

The Congress, by Public Law 100-307, as amended, has called on our Nation to reaffirm the role of prayer in our society and to respect the freedom of religion by recognizing each year a “National Day of Prayer.” 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim May 3, 2007, as a National Day of Prayer. I ask the citizens of our Nation to give thanks, each according to his or her own faith, for the freedoms and blessings we have received and for God's continued guidance, comfort, and protection. I invite all Americans to join in observing this day with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twentieth day of April, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 07-2059

Billing code 3195-01-P
§ 185.115 Applicability; preemptive effect. ( a ) An existing vessel need not comply with the hull marking requirements in § 185.602(c) until completion of a vessel's first drydock required by § 176.600 of this subchapter, which occurs after March 11, 1996.
( b ) An existing vessel need not comply with the marking requirement in §§ 185.604 and 185.610, where the size and contents of the markings required by these sections vary from the size and contents of required markings on lifesaving equipment, watertight doors, and watertight hatches on the vessel prior to March 11, 1996, until the existing markings are no longer legible as determined by the cognizant Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI).
( c ) An existing vessel need not comply with the requirements of §§ 185.514, 185.516, and 185.604(i) until completion of the first inspection for certification that occurs after March 11, 1996.
( d ) The regulations in this part have preemptive effect over State or local regulations in the same field.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 1005, Jan. 10, 1996; 61 FR 24465, May 15, 1996, as amended by USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33892, June 7, 2012]
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Florida Business BancGroup, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Marti J. Warren, Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  |                                             
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|                      |  |  | 
|Date: August 10, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    MARTI J. WARREN
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Marti J. Warren, Principal Financial Officer
# C_2012273EN.01000901.xml

| 8.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/9

---

Order of the General Court of 9 July 2012 — Pigui v Commission

(Case T-382/11) (1)

1

(Action for failure to act - Position taken - Application for directions to be issued - Manifest inadmissibility)

2012/C 273/14

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cristina Pigui (Strejnic, Romania) (represented by: M. Alexe, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Enegren and D. Roussanov, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for failure to act, seeking a declaration that the European Commission unlawfully failed to define its position on the applicant’s request, first, to initiate, pursuant to Articles 4 and 15 of Decision No 1720/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 November 2006 establishing an action programme in the field of lifelong learning (OJ 2006 L 327, p. 45), an investigation into the Online Master organised by the European Online Academy (EOA), founded by the Centre international de formation européenne (CIFE), in cooperation with the Jean Monnet Chair at the University of Cologne (Germany), and, second, to take all measures provided for by Article 6 of that decision in order to prevent further illegal conduct, to restore the situation ab initio of those persons affected by such illegal conduct or, at least, in so far as the applicant is concerned, and, lastly, to withdraw the funding for that Master if it fails to comply with key human rights principles, to which reference is made in Article 1(3)(i) of that decision, and relevant principles of European Union law.

ab initio

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Cristina Pigui shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Cristina Pigui shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6616

LLOYD STEVEN LANE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM R. BARKER; EMILIO PAGAN; RONALD

GODWIN; BILLY YARD BATTEN; MITCH LOWERY;

THEODORE SWANN; MIKE WALKER; G. WAYNE SPEARS;

JOHN WILLIAMS; LARRY MATHIS; MALCOLM L.

DEBNAM; MELISSA SELLARS; OFFICER LAMM,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

J. R. HUNT; KATHY MERCER; LINWOOD TEDDER; KIM

EDWARDS; LINDA MIASTO; J. COLEMAN; PATRICIA

MABREY; MARGARET WILLIAMSON; WILLIAM BRITT;

RAY JERNIGAN; HENRY CAMBELL; ANTHONY SINGLETARY; RANDY CRIBB; HENRY CORR STEVENS; CAROL

WHITAKER; JOHN R. MILLS; CLIFTON DAVENPORT;

C. R. LINCOLN; LARRY W. MOORE; LYNN PHILLIPS;

JAMES L. MILLER; FRANKLIN E. FREEMAN, JR.;

J. A. DOBBIN; PAT CHAVIS,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-93-431-5-CT-H)

Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 5, 1996
2

Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lloyd Steven Lane, Appellant Pro Se. William Dennis Worley, NORTH

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lane v. Barker,

No. CA-93-431-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 1996). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Editorial Note on Part 161
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 161 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49238, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 161.006-1 Applicable specifications. ( a ) The following specifications, of the issue in effect on the date motor lifeboat searchlights are manufactured, form a part of this subpart: ( 1 ) Navy Department specifications: 42S5—Screws, machine, cap and set, and nuts. 43B11—Bolts, nuts, studs, and tap-rivets (and materials for same).
( 2 ) Federal specification: QQ-B-611—Brass, Commercial; bars, plates, rods, shapes, sheets, and strip.
( 3 ) Standards of ASTM: ASTM B 117-97, Standard Practice for Operating Salt Spray (Fog) Apparatus—161.006-5 ASTM B 456-95, Standard Specification for Electrodeposited Coatings of Copper Plus Nickel Plus Chromium and Nickel Plus Chromium—161.006-4 You may obtain these standards from The American Society for Testing and Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.
( 4 ) Underwriters' Laboratories, Inc.: Standard for flexible cord and fixture wire, third edition, October, 1935.
( b ) Copies of the above specifications shall be kept on file by the manufacturer, together with the approved plans and certificate of approval.
[CGFR 49-43, 15 FR 127, Jan. 11, 1950, as amended by USCG-1999-5151, 64 FR 67185, Dec. 1, 1999]
###### Editorial Note on Part 153

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 153.190 Stability requirements.

Each vessel must meet the applicable requirements in Subchapter S of this chapter.

[CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51009, Nov. 4, 1983. Redesignated by CGD 81-101, 52 FR 7780, Mar. 12, 1987]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

AMER ARAJ, 

 Defendant. 

 

Case No. 2:15-cv-10298 

District Judge Gerald E. Rosen 

Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti

___________________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST 

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (DE 13) 

 This matter is before the Court for consideration of Defendant Amer Araj’s 

request for appointment of a public defender. (DE 13.) For the reasons that 

follow, Defendant’s motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

I. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS 

 This is a copyright infringement case, in which Plaintiff alleges that 

Defendant used the BitTorrent file distribution network to copy and distribute 

twenty-two pieces of copyrighted work. To date, Defendant has proceeded pro se 

in this action. He filed the instant request on June 30, 2015, stating only that he 

“would like to request a court appointed public defender, as I cannot afford one.” 

(DE 13.) 

2:15-cv-10298-GER-APP Doc # 15 Filed 06/30/15 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 67
2

II. ANALYSIS 

Although Defendant styles his motion as one for appointment of counsel, 

the Court does not have the authority to appoint a private attorney (or a public 

defender) for Plaintiff in this civil matter. Dewitt v. Corizon, 760 F.3d 654, 657 

(6th Cir. 2014) (“[t]here is no right to recruitment of counsel in federal civil 

litigation . . . .”). The Supreme Court has held that there is a presumption that “an 

indigent litigant has a right to appointed counsel only when, if he loses, he may be 

deprived of his physical liberty.” Lassiter v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 452 U.S. 18, 26-

27 (1981). 

 Applying the foregoing authority, Defendant has not described any 

circumstances to justify a request for appointment of counsel. Accordingly, at this 

time, Defendant’s motion to appoint counsel is DENIED WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE. (DE 13.) Defendant may petition the Court for the recruitment of 

pro bono counsel if this case survives dispositive motion practice, proceeds to 

trial, or if other circumstances demonstrate such a need in the future. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 30, 2015 s/Anthony P. Patti 

 Anthony P. Patti 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

2:15-cv-10298-GER-APP Doc # 15 Filed 06/30/15 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 68
3

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record 

on June 30, 2015, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail. 

 s/ Michael Williams 

 Case Manager to the 

Honorable Anthony P. Patti 

 

2:15-cv-10298-GER-APP Doc # 15 Filed 06/30/15 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 69
§ 167.65-70 Reports of accidents, repairs, and unsafe boilers and machinery by engineers. ( a ) Before making repairs to a boiler of a nautical school ship the engineer in charge shall report, in writing, the nature of such repairs to the nearest Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, where such repairs are to be made.
( b ) And it shall be the duty of all engineers when an accident occurs to the boilers or machinery in their charge tending to render the further use of such boilers or machinery unsafe until repairs are made, or when, by reason of ordinary wear, such boilers or machinery have become unsafe, to report the same to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, immediately upon the arrival of the nautical school ship at the first port reached subsequent to the accident, or after the discovery of such unsafe condition by said engineer.