# C_2011347EN.01004603.xml

| 26.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/46 |
| ---------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | -------- |

---

Action brought on 28 September 2011 — ZZ v EIB

(Case F-95/11)

2011/C 347/88

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: N. Thieltgen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the implied decision by the EIB to alter the conditions of exercise and the nature of the applicant’s duties, and a claim for damages.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the implied decision by the EIB to alter the conditions of exercise and the nature of the applicant’s duties; |
| - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |

| — | direct the EIB to reinstate the applicant in a post in accordance with his grade and employment; |
| - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |

| — | declare the existence of administrative errors by the EIB; |
| - | ---------------------------------------------------------- |

| — | declare the EIB liable to the applicant in respect of the unlawfulness of the decision and the administrative errors; |
| - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |

| — | order the EIB to compensate the applicant for the material and non-material damage arising from the unlawful decision and administrative errors, plus interest for delay;
—
with regard to the unlawfulness of the decision:
—
for non-material damage, EUR 20 000; —
for material damage by way of loss of remuneration, EUR 113 100; with regard to the administrative errors:
—
for infringement by the EIB of its duty to have due regard for the welfare of officials and its duty of protection, EUR 119 100; —
for infringement of Article 42 of the Staff Regulations, EUR 10 000 | — | with regard to the unlawfulness of the decision:
—
for non-material damage, EUR 20 000; —
for material damage by way of loss of remuneration, EUR 113 100; with regard to the administrative errors:
—
for infringement by the EIB of its duty to have due regard for the welfare of officials and its duty of protection, EUR 119 100; —
for infringement of Article 42 of the Staff Regulations, EUR 10 000 | — | for non-material damage, EUR 20 000; | — | for material damage by way of loss of remuneration, EUR 113 100; | — | for infringement by the EIB of its duty to have due regard for the welfare of officials and its duty of protection, EUR 119 100; | — | for infringement of Article 42 of the Staff Regulations, EUR 10 000 |
| - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------- | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| — | with regard to the unlawfulness of the decision:
—
for non-material damage, EUR 20 000; —
for material damage by way of loss of remuneration, EUR 113 100; with regard to the administrative errors:
—
for infringement by the EIB of its duty to have due regard for the welfare of officials and its duty of protection, EUR 119 100; —
for infringement of Article 42 of the Staff Regulations, EUR 10 000 | — | for non-material damage, EUR 20 000; | — | for material damage by way of loss of remuneration, EUR 113 100; | — | for infringement by the EIB of its duty to have due regard for the welfare of officials and its duty of protection, EUR 119 100; | — | for infringement of Article 42 of the Staff Regulations, EUR 10 000 | | |
| — | for non-material damage, EUR 20 000; | | | | | | | | | | |
| — | for material damage by way of loss of remuneration, EUR 113 100; | | | | | | | | | | |
| — | for infringement by the EIB of its duty to have due regard for the welfare of officials and its duty of protection, EUR 119 100; | | | | | | | | | | |
| — | for infringement of Article 42 of the Staff Regulations, EUR 10 000 | | | | | | | | | | |

| — | order the EIB to pay the costs. |
| - | ------------------------------- |

---