alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Appellant had an appointed attorney, but later filed a written waiver of the right to counsel. 1

See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 1.051(g) (West Supp. 2007). Appellant’s original attorney

thereafter served as stand-by counsel until he was allowed to withdraw and was replaced by

another attorney. Appellant personally conducted the defense at trial. He filed a pro se notice

of appeal and did not request counsel on appeal. Appellant was provided a copy of the appellate

record.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00527-CR

Merlon Hines, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 299TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-04-302710, HONORABLE JON N. WISSER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Following a bench trial, appellant Merlon Hines was found guilty of aggravated

sexual assault. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.021 (West Supp. 2007). The court assessed

punishment, enhanced by previous felony convictions, at imprisonment for life.

Appellant represents himself on appeal, as he did at trial. His brief on appeal was

1

originally due in March 2007. On appellant’s motion, the time for filing was extended three times,

the last extension being to November 16, 2007. On December 11, 2007, after no brief was filed and

no further extension of time was requested, the Court ordered appellant to tender his brief for filing
2

no later than January 4, 2008. The order advised appellant that if he did not file a brief as ordered,

the appeal would be submitted for decision without a brief. No brief has been received. See Tex. R.

App. P. 38.8(b)(4) (consideration of appeal without briefs).

We have examined the record and find no fundamental error or other matter that

should be considered in the interest of justice. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. 

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson

Affirmed

Filed: February 27, 2008

Do Not Publish
#### LIGHTNER *v.*THE STATE.

The evidence in this case fails to support the verdict, and a new trial should have been granted upon that ground.

Submitted October 16,

Decided November 7, 1906.

Accusation of misdemeanor. Before Judge Crisp. City court of Dawson. June 8, 1906.

*W. II. Gurr*and *J. G.*Paries, for plaintiff in error.

*M. J.*Yeomans, solicitor, contra.

Atkinson, J.

The defendant was tried for a misdemeanor, there being two counts in the accusation, one charging him with fornication, and the other with adultery and fornication. Upon the'trial it appeared that the defendant, a white.man, traveling with his child, and a mulatto woman, whom he claimed to be his nurse,' spent nights at residences along the way. On two occasions the three slept in one room. On one of these occasions there were two beds, *564and both appeared the next morning to have been occupied. This was at the residence of a negro. On the other occasion there was-but one bed, while a pallet was made before the fire for the woman. This was at the residence of white jDeople. At this house it was-proposed by the wife of the host to let the woman sleep on a pallet in the kitchen, but the defendant “preferred that' she occupy the same room with him and the baby.” TJpon the foregoing evidence the defendant was found guilty. He moved for a new trial, and the motion being overruled, the defendant comes to this court-assigning error upon the judgment overruling his motion for new trial'.

The evidence at best affords ground for suspicion of the guilt of the accused. There is no direct evidence showing criminal intercourse between the defendant and the woman, and the circumstances are not such as to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis than that of the guilt of the accused. The verdict should have been set aside upon the ground, contained in the motion, that there was-no evidence to support it.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
§ 189.01-2 When required. ( a ) Except as noted in this subpart or subpart 189.05 of this part, no vessel subject to inspection and certification shall be operated without a valid certificate of inspection.
[CGFR 67-83, 33 FR 1118, Jan. 27, 1968. Redesignated by USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33892, June 7, 2012]
G-17(B) Account-opening Sample

Interest Rates and Interest Charges

Annual Percentage Rate 

(APR) for Purchases 

8.99%

This APR will vary with the market based on the Prime Rate. 

APR for Balance 

Transfers 

 0.00% (Intro. APR through your December 2007 billing cycle) 

15.99% (APR after December 2007) 

Balance transfer fees will also apply (see Fees section below). 

Notice Regarding Interest Charges: Your introductory APR applies only to 

balance transfers, not to purchases. During the introductory period we will apply 

your payments to transferred balances before we apply them to any purchases you 

make. You will be charged interest on all purchases until your entire balance has

been paid off completely, including transferred balances. 

APR for Cash Advances 21.99%

This APR will vary with the market based on the Prime Rate. 

Cash advance fees will also apply (see Fees section below). 

Penalty APR and When it 

Applies 

28.99%

This APR may be applied to the entire balance on your account if you: 

1) Make a late payment twice in a six-month period; 

2) Go over your credit limit twice in a six-month period; 

3) Make a payment that is returned; or 

4) Do any of the above on another account that you have with us. 

How Long Will the Penalty APR Apply?: If your APRs are increased for any of 

these reasons, the Penalty APR will apply until you make six consecutive minimum 

payments when due and do not exceed your credit limit during that time period.

Minimum Interest Charge If you are charged interest, the charge will be no less than $1.00. 

Grace Period If you pay your entire balance in full each month, you have at least 25 days after the 

close of each period to pay your balance on purchases without being charged interest. 

There is no grace period for cash advances and balance transfers.

Website for Additional 

Information 

To learn more about factors to consider when applying for or using a credit card, visit 

the website of the Federal Reserve Board at http://www.frb.gov/location. 

Fees 

Annual Fee None

Transaction Fees 

• Balance Transfer Either $5 or 3% of the amount of each transfer, whichever is greater (maximum fee: 

$100). 

• Cash Advance Either $5 or 3% of the amount of each cash advance, whichever is greater. 

• Foreign Transaction 2% of each transaction in U.S. dollars

Penalty Fees

• Late Payment $29 if balance is less than or equal to $1,000; 

$35 if balance is more than $1,000 (Your APRs may also increase; see Penalty APR 

section above.) 

• Over-the-Credit Limit $29 (Your APRs may also increase; see Penalty APR section above.)

• Returned Payment $35 (Your APRs may also increase; see Penalty APR section above.)

Other Fees 

• Required Account 

Protector Plan

$0.79 per $100 of balance at the end of each statement period. See back for details.

How We Will Calculate Your Balance: We use a method called "average daily balance (including new purchases)." 

See your account agreement for more details. 

Billing Rights: Information on your rights to dispute transactions and how to exercise those rights is provided in your 

account agreement.
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- :J.-0 \5 - ~ (o3l- lOft/-,v M- J../Cf-A.b 

Directorate Identifier: -AD 

(l,vou make dumges to the l'alues in the tah/e below. you must ensure tlte totals update accordingly. (( 

they do not, click (or l'ah) into und then out 1!{the changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

replacement) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost 

Do not include on- (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet 

condition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Check Drain 2.0 '< I'( (!II 

Valves $0 I 71J (It) 90 • I ~. ;,~.I !i(l 

Eddy Current 

5.0 \ f'' Oil $0 I '..:: 00 90 '<; _' ''' Ill) Inspction 

Pressure Check 

3.0 Inspection , "'5:' ()I) $0 " ' ' (lf) 90 ~ l """~. l.J ._,ri.l}l' 

'; () ()() \ () ( )() ,. :1 nu 

') tl.OO ) 0. (J( I ' o oo 

\ () I )II ' 0 ! !I I ' '!, II 00 

<., 0 ()() o on fill(! 

\ 11 on ' tJ no ' (J i ill 

I \ 0,()(1 ,, n no -:. q (1(1 

" () ()q '· ()i(l II 'Ill 

~· II O!l ' l) (;() ' () ,)() 

•, > () .! J( I ' (1, I f 1 II ll(l 

' i \ 0.00 j \ 0 PO ., (1, {\(I 

i ') (I ()() ' I \ 0 ()() ~ (1(10 

\ ()'()(I l ', ll.Oil '> II II(J 

s ()()I) \ n.on o no 

'. () {)() ' (I ()(I \ (I (1(1 

()_1)(1 ' (!'Ill " IiilO 

'• () ()(I \ /l ( '() n 011 

'• (l ()() ' ()I (I 111'1 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $76,500 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: ~ 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and closeup) 

' , .no '• ( 11() 

·~ 11011 ', • 1 Ill' 

', lr.ll(l ' II II( I 

" {l ,i )() ' ·' () I ill 
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? . 

YES* D NO IZI 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? . , 

YES* D NO IZI 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. '- ' 

YES D NO IZI 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? -

YES* D NO [8] 

*Explanation: 

DO NOT DELETE PAGE BREAK
#### § 171.075 [Reserved]
User Manual exceeds 10.5 Megbytes, but can be found at:

http://download.dji innovations.com/downloads/inspire_1/en/Inspire_1_User_Manual_v1.0_en.pdf
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 78 (Tuesday, April 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20338-20339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2005]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Electronic Health 
Records Workgroup Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 20339]]

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 16th meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Electronic Health Records Workgroup in accordance 
with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., 
App.).

DATES: May 22, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. [Eastern].

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building, (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 4090. Please bring photo ID for entry to a 
Federal building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/healthrecords/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Workgroup will continue its discussion 
on ways to achieve widespread adoption of certified EHRs, minimizing 
gaps in adoption among providers.
    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional 
information, go to: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/healthrecords/ehr_instruct.html.

    Dated: April 16, 2007.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 07-2005 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
# C_2013079EN.01001601.xml

| 16.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2013 — Polyelectrolyte Producers Group and Others v Commission

(Case T-368/11) (1)

1

(REACH - Transitional measures concerning the restrictions on the placing on the market and use of acrylamide for grouting applications - Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Proportionality - Obligation to state reasons)

2013/C 79/28

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Polyelectrolyte Producers Group (Brussels, Belgium); SNF SAS (Andrézieux-Bouthéon, France); and Travetanche Injection SPRL (Brussels) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem and R. Cana, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Oliver and E. Manhaeve, Agents, assisted by K. Sawyer, Barrister)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C. Wissels, M. Noort and B. Koopman, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) No 366/2011 of 14 April 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards Annex XVII (Acrylamide) (OJ 2011 L 101, p. 12).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Polyelectrolyte Producers Group, SNF SAS and Travetanche Injection SPRL to bear the costs they have incurred in the main proceedings and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Polyelectrolyte Producers Group, SNF SAS and Travetanche Injection SPRL to bear the costs they have incurred in the main proceedings and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders Travetanche Injection to pay the costs relating to the proceedings for interim measures; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Travetanche Injection to pay the costs relating to the proceedings for interim measures;

| 4. | Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 162
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 162.050-5 Contents of application. ( a ) An application for approval of a separator, oil content meter, or a bilge alarm must contain the following information: ( 1 ) A brief description of the item submitted for approval.
( 2 ) The name and address of the applicant and its manufacturing facility.
( 3 ) A detailed description of quality control procedures, in-process and final inspections and tests followed in manufacturing the item, and construction and sales record keeping systems maintained.
( 4 ) Arrangement drawings and piping diagrams of the item that give the information prescribed by § 56.01-10(d) of this chapter.
( 5 ) Detailed electrical plans of the type described in § 110.25-1 of this chapter.
( 6 ) An operating and maintenance manual containing detailed and easily understandable instructions on installation, operation, calibration, zeroing, and maintenance of the item.
( 7 ) For each monitor and bilge alarm and each control on a separator, the vibration test report described in § 162.050-37.
( 8 ) For each oil content meter, a statement of whether it is to be used with crude oils, refined products, or both.
( 9 ) A list of the substances used in operating the item that require certification under part 147 of this chapter as articles of ships' stores and supplies.
( 10 ) The name of the facility to conduct approval testing.
( 11 ) If the applicant intends to use a test rig other than a test rig of the facility, a detailed description of the rig.
( b ) An applicant may incorporate by reference in his application information that he has submitted in a previous application.
[44 FR 53359, Sept. 13, 1979, as amended by USCG-1999-6216, 64 FR 53228, Oct. 1, 1999; USCG-2004-18939, 74 FR 3383, Jan. 16, 2009]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 5
Federal Reserve Bank of: Richmond

## Filings received during the week ending December 3, 2005

|Filer                           | Filing Type    | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                        | End of Comment Period                                  
|------------------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|ATLANTIC BANCSHARES, INC.       | * 3A1          | Atlantic Bancshares, Inc., Bluffton, South Carolina, to become a bank holding company through the acquisition of 100% of the voting securities of Atlantic Community Bank, Bluffton, South Carolina (in organization). | Newspaper:12/16/2005Federal Register:12/27/2005        
|Newspaper:                      | 12/16/2005    
|Federal Register:               | 12/27/2005    
|CITIZENS BANK AND TRUST COMPANY | Premises       | Citizens Bank & Trust Company, Blackstone, Virginia, to increase its investment in bank premises in the amount of $95,000.                                                                                             | Newspaper:Not applicableFederal Register:Not applicable
|Newspaper:                      | Not applicable
|Federal Register:               | Not applicable

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location                             | RSSDID  | Exam Date  | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|-------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|COMMERCEFIRST BK, ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND              | 2897736 | 08/15/2005 | 11/14/2005     | S         | Small Bank 
|PUTNAM CTY BK, HURRICANE, WEST VIRGINIA            | 417626  | 08/08/2005 | 11/09/2005     | S         | Large Bank 
|RIVER CITY BK, MECHANICSVILLE, VIRGINIA            | 3267185 | 08/15/2005 | 11/10/2005     | S         | Small Bank 
|SOUTHERN CMNTY B&TC, WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA | 2514547 | 06/27/2005 | 09/29/2005     | S         | Large Bank 

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 176.700 Permission for repairs and alterations. ( a ) Repairs or alterations to the hull, machinery, or equipment that affect the safety of the vessel must not be made without the approval of the cognizant OCMI, except during an emergency. When repairs are made during an emergency, the owner, managing operator, or master shall notify the OCMI as soon as practicable after such repairs or alternations are made. Repairs or alterations that affect the safety of the vessel include, but are not limited to: replacement, repair, or refastening of deck or hull planking, plating, and structural members; repair of plate or frame cracks; damage repair or replacement, other than replacement in kind, of electrical wiring, fuel lines, tanks, boilers and other pressure vessels, and steering, propulsion and power supply systems; alterations affecting stability; and repair or alteration of lifesaving, fire detecting, or fire extinguishing equipment.
( b ) The owner or managing operator shall submit drawings, sketches, or written specifications describing the details of any proposed alterations to the cognizant OCMI. Proposed alterations must be approved by the OCMI before work is started.
( c ) Drawings are not required to be submitted for repairs or replacements in kind.
( d ) The OCMI may require an inspection and testing whenever a repair or alteration is undertaken.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 76 (Friday, April 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20006]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1940]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2007-14]


Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petitions for exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a certain petition seeking 
relief from specified requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this 
notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and participation in, 
this aspect of FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this 
notice nor the inclusion of omission of information in the summary is 
intended to affect the legal status of any petition or its final 
disposition.

DATES: Comments on petitions received must identify the petition docket 
number involved and must be received on or before May 10, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the petition to the Docket Management 
System, U.S. Department of Transportation, Room Plaza 401, 400 Seventh 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001. You must identify the docket 
number FAA-2007-27705 at the beginning of your comments. If you wish to 
receive confirmation that the FAA received your comments, include a 
self-addressed, stamped postcard.
    You may also submit comments through the Internet to http://dms.dot.gov. You may review the public docket containing the petition, 
any comments received, and any final disposition in person in the 
Dockets Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, except 
Federal holidays. The Dockets Office (telephone 1-800-647-5527) is on 
the plaza level of the NASSIF Building at the Department of 
Transportation at the above address. Also, you may review public 
dockets on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frances Shaver (202-267-9681), Office 
of Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal Aviation Administration, 800 
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591-3356 or Tyneka Thomas 
(202-267-7626), Office of Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591-
3356.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91.

    Issued in Washington, DC., on April 5, 2007.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petitions for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2007-27705.
    Petitioner: CareFlite.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 43(h)(i).
    Description of Relief Sought: The exemption, if granted, would 
allow trained CareFlite medical crew members to remove the Propaq mount 
without requiring the pilot to shut down the aircraft and perform the 
function.
[FR Doc. 07-1940 Filed 4-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M