alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 172.005 Applicability. This part applies to each vessel that carries one of the following cargoes in bulk: ( a ) Grain.
( b ) A cargo listed in Table 30.25-1 of this chapter.
( c ) A cargo regulated under 33 CFR part 157.
( d ) A cargo listed in Table 151.01-10(b) of this chapter.
( e ) A cargo listed in Table I of part 153 of this chapter.
( f ) A cargo listed in Table 4 of part 154 of this chapter.
( g ) Any dry bulk cargo carried in a new Great Lakes vessel.
[CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51040, Nov. 4, 1983, as amended by CGD 80-159, 51 FR 33059, Sept. 18, 1986]
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACOCUNTING FIRM

#  

Tothe Board of Directors

NorthernCalifornia Bancorp Inc.

Monterey,California

 

Wehereby consent to the use in the 10-K for the Northern California Bancorp Inc.of our report dated March 29, 2010 relating to the financial statements ofthe Northern California Bancorp Inc. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 andfor the three-year period ended December 31, 2009.

 

 

*/s/Hutchinson and Bloodgood LLP*

 

Glendale,CA

March 29,2010

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATION





I, Andrew Gordon, certify that:




1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended October 31, 2010 of Coffee Holding Co., Inc.;
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 
 (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
 (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the quarterly report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant internal control over financial reporting; and
 All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  February 28, 2011
By:
/s/ Andrew GordonAndrew GordonPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive and Accounting Officer)
#### § 174.350 Specific applicability.

This subpart applies to each new ship of 500 gross tons or over, as calculated by the International Convention on Tonnage Measurement of Ships, 1969, designed primarily for the carriage of dry cargoes, including roll-on/roll-off ships and integrated tug and barges (ITBs) when operating as a combined unit.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

OCALA DIVISION

MARIBETH SCHONBERG and STEVEN E.

SCHONBERG,

Plaintiffs,

-vs- Case No. 5:09-cv-534-Oc-10GRJ

Civil Officer BERNIE SANDERS, Agent of

the U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders Principal

Campaign Committee, a/k/a "Friends of

Bernie Sanders," et al., ,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

O R D E R

The Plaintiffs have filed today a Complaint entitled “Plaintiffs’ Complaint for

Emergency Injunction, Damages, and Motion for Declaratory Judgment” (Doc. 1). Though

not denominated as such, the Plaintiffs are essentially seeking a temporary restraining

order under Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 and Rules 4.05 and 4.06 of the Local Rules of the Middle

District of Florida, without complying with the requirements of the rules governing

emergency injunctive relief. Additionally, with respect to those requirements, it does not

appear: (1) that the Plaintiffs are threatened with such imminent harm that notice and an

opportunity to be heard by the Defendants is impracticable; or (2) that the Plaintiffs have

demonstrated a likelihood of ultimate success on the merits.
2

It therefore follows that the Plaintiffs’ application for emergency injunctive relief (Doc.

1), Notice Requesting Emergency Three-Judge Court (Doc. 3), and Emergency Motion to

Shorten Time and for Leave to File a Reply (Doc. 4) are all DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DONE and ORDERED at Ocala, Florida this 3rd day of December, 2009.

Copies to: Counsel of Record
# C_2011282EN.01004702.xml

| 24.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/47

---

Action brought on 4 August 2011 — Iberdrola v Commission

(Case T-431/11)

2011/C 282/87

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Iberdrola, SA (Bilbao, Spain) (represented by: J. Ruiz Calzado, M. Núñez-Müller and J. Domínguez Pérez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul Article 1(1) of the decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 1(1) of the decision;

| — | in the alternative, annul Article 1(4) and (5) of the decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul Article 1(4) and (5) of the decision;

| — | in the further alternative, annul Article 4 of the decision, or amend its scope as appropriate, and |
| --- | --- |

—

in the further alternative, annul Article 4 of the decision, or amend its scope as appropriate, and

| — | order the Commission to pay all the costs arising from these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay all the costs arising from these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

This action has been brought against the Commission's Decision of 12 January 2011 in Case No C 45/2007 (ex NN 51/2007, ex CP 9/2007), on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions implemented by Spain.

The pleas in law and main arguments are those raised in Case T-429/11 BBVA v Commission.

BBVA

Commission

---
§ 190.15-90 Vessels contracted for prior to March 1, 1968. ( a ) Existing arrangements previously approved will be considered satisfactory so long as they are maintained in good condition to the satisfaction of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection. Minor repairs and alterations may be made to the same standards as the original design: *Provided,* That in no case will a greater departure from the standards of §§ 190.15-5 through 190.15-15 be permitted than presently exists.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                       LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS LTD.

          COMPUTATION OF DEFICIENCY OF EARNINGS TO COVER FIXED CHARGES
                  AND RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COVER FIXED CHARGES
                         (in thousands, except ratios)
                                  (Unaudited)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                 YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                             --------------------------------
                                                               2001        2000       1999
                                                             ---------   --------   ---------
<S>                                                          <C>         <C>        <C>
Earnings:
  Loss before income taxes, equity in net loss of
     affiliates, minority interest, Globalstar related
     impairment charges, cumulative effect of accounting
     change and extraordinary gain.........................  $(160,274)  $(56,843)  $ (62,138)
  Plus fixed charges:
     Interest expense......................................    207,027    187,918     173,718
     Interest component of rent expense(1).................     15,717     15,665       9,953
  Less capitalized interest................................     23,097     17,082      84,315
                                                             ---------   --------   ---------
Earnings available to cover fixed charges..................  $  41,311   $129,658   $  37,218
                                                             =========   ========   =========
Fixed charges(2)...........................................  $ 303,487    271,111     228,293
                                                             =========   ========   =========
Deficiency of earnings to cover fixed charges..............  $ 264,114    141,453     191,075
                                                             =========   ========   =========
</Table>

---------------
(1) The interest component of rent expense is deemed to be approximately 25% of
    total rent expense.

(2) Preferred dividends have not been adjusted for income taxes, due to the
    composition of the taxing jurisdictions underlying the Company's operations
    and the resulting impact on the Company's effective tax rate.
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.142-4 Approval procedures. ( a ) Manufacturers that desire type approval should submit a written notice to the Commandant (CG-ENG-4) describing the product and its intended uses. The Commandant will evaluate this information and notify the manufacturer of the product's suitability for testing. The manufacturer should then contract directly with an accepted independent laboratory to perform the required tests and inspections.
( b ) Upon completion of the required testing and inspections, the manufacturer must submit either a written request for type approval to the Commandant (CG-ENG-4), United States Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, or electronically submit a request to *typeapproval@uscg.mil*. The request must indicate the name and address of the manufacturer, all product designations, and the address of all manufacturing facilities. The request must include a copy of the final fire test report and the production inspection procedures. From the information submitted, the Commandant determines whether or not the product is acceptable for type approval. If the product is determined to be acceptable, a type approval certificate valid for a 5-year period will be issued. If the product is not accepted, the manufacturer will be notified of the reasons why.
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59783, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 148.405 Sources of ignition. ( a ) Except in an emergency, no welding, burning, cutting, chipping, or other operations involving the use of fire, open flame, sparks, or arc-producing equipment, may be performed in a cargo hold containing a Table 148.10 material or in an adjacent space.
( b ) A cargo hold or adjacent space must not have any flammable gas concentrations over 10 percent of the LFL before the master may approve operations involving the use of fire, open flame, or spark- or arc-producing equipment in that hold or adjacent space.
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.1010 Electrical equipment in gas-dangerous space or zone. ( a ) Except as allowed in this section, electrical equipment must not be installed in a gas-dangerous space or zone.
( b ) Intrinsically safe electrical equipment and wiring may be in a gas-dangerous space or zone.
( c ) A submerged cargo pump motor may be in a cargo tank if: ( 1 ) Low liquid level, motor current, or pump discharge pressure automatically shuts down power to the pump motor if the pump loses suction;
( 2 ) There is an audible and visual alarm at the cargo control station that actuates if the motor shuts down under the requirements of paragraph (c)(1) of this section; and
( 3 ) There is a lockable circuit breaker or lockable switch that disconnects the power to the motor.
( d ) A supply cable for a submerged cargo pump motor may be in a hold space.
( e ) A hold space that has a tank that is not required to have a secondary barrier under § 154.459 may only have: ( 1 ) Through runs of cable;
( 2 ) Explosion-proof lighting fixtures;
( 3 ) Depth sounding devices in gas-tight enclosures;
( 4 ) Log devices in gas-tight enclosures; and
( 5 ) Impressed current cathodic protection system electrodes in gas-tight enclosures.
( f ) A space that is separated by a gastight steel boundary from a hold space that has a cargo tank that must have a secondary barrier, under the requirements of § 154.459, may only have: ( 1 ) Through runs of cable;
( 2 ) Explosion-proof lighting fixtures;
( 3 ) Depth sounding devices in gastight enclosures;
( 4 ) Log devices in gastight enclosures;
( 5 ) Impressed current cathodic protection system electrodes in gastight enclosures;
( 6 ) Explosion-proof motors that operate cargo system valves or ballast system valves; and
( 7 ) Explosion-proof bells for general alarm systems.
( g ) A cargo handling room may only have: ( 1 ) Explosion-proof lighting fixtures; and
( 2 ) Explosion-proof bells for general alarm systems.
( h ) A space for cargo hose storage may only have: ( 1 ) Explosion-proof lighting fixtures; and
( 2 ) Through runs of cable.
( i ) A space that has cargo piping may only have: ( 1 ) Explosion-proof lighting fixtures; and
( 2 ) Through runs of cable.
( j ) A gas-dangerous zone on the weather deck may only have: ( 1 ) Explosion-proof equipment that is for the operation of the vessel; and
( 2 ) Through runs of cable.
( k ) A space, except those under paragraphs (e) through (j) of this section, that has a direct opening to a gas-dangerous space or zone may only have the electrical equipment allowed in the gas-dangerous space or zone.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                          50,741
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,589
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,909
<PP&E>                                          28,213
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 332,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,488
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           323
<OTHER-SE>                                     315,194
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   332,418
<SALES>                                         35,803
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,707
<CGS>                                           11,546
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,546
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,261
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,707
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,707
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00875-CV

Herbert Allen SMITH and Missy Rene Smith,

Appellants

v.

SAN ANTONIO HOUSING AUTHORITY FOUNDATION, INC.

d/b/a San Antonio Housing Authority a/k/a SAHA,

Appellee

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-CI-18484

Honorable David A. Berchelmann, Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 5, 2011

DISMISSED

Appellants have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion contains a certificate 

of service to appellee, which has not opposed the motion. Therefore, we grant the motion and 

dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Costs of the appeal are taxed against 

appellants.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2016 (the "Form 10-Q") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").



I, Heather D. Brolick, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Issuer, certify that to my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 15, 2016



| | /s/ Heather D. Brolick               
| | -------------------------------------
| | Heather D. Brolick                   
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
<Page>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<Table>
<Caption>

                                                        Percentage of    State of Incorporation
      Parent                       Subsidiary             Ownership         or Organization
------------------------    --------------------------  --------------   ----------------------
<S>                         <C>                            <C>                  <C>
Yonkers Financial           The Yonkers Savings and        100%                 Federal
Corporation                 Loan Association, FA

The Yorkers Savings and     Yonkers Financial Services     100%                 New York
Loan Association, FA        Corporation

The Yonkers Savings and     Yonkers REIT, Inc.             100%                 New York
Loan Association, FA
</Table>
# C_2011282EN.01005202.xml

| 24.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/52

---

Action brought on 20 July 2011 — ZZ v Court of Auditors

(Case F-69/11)

2011/C 282/99

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Court of Auditors

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision of the Court of Auditors not to appoint the applicant to the post of Director of the Directorate for Human Resources and to appoint another candidate to that post

Form of orders sought

Form of orders sought

| — | Annulment of the decision of the Court of Auditors to appoint another person to the to the post of Director of the Directorate for Human Resources and not to appoint the applicant to that post; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the decision of the Court of Auditors to appoint another person to the to the post of Director of the Directorate for Human Resources and not to appoint the applicant to that post;

| — | in so far as is necessary, annul the decision rejecting the complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

in so far as is necessary, annul the decision rejecting the complaint;

| — | order the Court of Auditors to pay compensation for the material damage suffered consisting in the loss of financial rights connected to the contested decisions (including career and pension rights) and, therefore, the payment of those rights with effect from 1 January 2001; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Court of Auditors to pay compensation for the material damage suffered consisting in the loss of financial rights connected to the contested decisions (including career and pension rights) and, therefore, the payment of those rights with effect from 1 January 2001;

| — | order that the Court of Auditors pay symbolic damages of one euro as compensation for the non-material damage; |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the Court of Auditors pay symbolic damages of one euro as compensation for the non-material damage;

| — | order the Court of Auditors to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Court of Auditors to pay the costs.

---