alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 169.675 Generators and motors. ( a ) Each generator and motor must be fitted with a nameplate of corrosion-resistant material marked with the following information as applicable: ( 1 ) Name of manufacturer.
( 2 ) Manufacturer's type and frame designation.
( 3 ) Output in kilowatts or horsepower rating.
( 4 ) Kind of rating (continuous, intermittent, etc.).
( 5 ) Revolutions per minute at rated load.
( 6 ) Amperes at rated load.
( 7 ) Voltage.
( 8 ) Frequency if applicable.
( 9 ) Number of phases, if applicable.
( 10 ) Type of winding (for direct-current motors).
( b ) Each vessel of more than 65 feet in length having only electrically driven fire and bilge pumps must have two generators. One of these generators must be driven by a means independent of the auxiliary propulsion plant. A generator that is not independent of the auxiliary propulsion plant must meet the requirements of § 111.10-4(c) of this chapter.
( c ) Each generator and motor must be in a location that is accessible, adequately ventilated, and as dry as practicable.
( d ) Each generator and motor must be mounted as high as practicable above the bilges to avoid damage by splash and to avoid contact with low lying vapors.
( e ) Each motor for use in a location exposed to the weather must be of the watertight or waterproof type or must be enclosed in a watertight housing. The motor enclosure or housing must be provided with a check valve for drainage or a tapped hole at the lowest part of the frame for attaching a drain pipe or drain plug.
( f ) Except as provided in paragraphs (g) and (h) of this section, each generator and motor for use in a machinery space must be designed for an ambient temperature of 50 degrees C. (122 degrees F.).
( g ) A generator or motor may be designed for an ambient temperature of 40 degrees C. (104 degrees F.) if the vessel is designed so that the ambient temperature in the machinery space will not exceed 40 degrees C. under normal operating conditions.
( h ) A generator or motor designed for 40 degrees C. may be used in a 50 degrees C. ambient location provided it is derated to 80 percent of full load rating, and the rating or setting of the overcurrent device is reduced accordingly. A nameplate specifying the derated capacity must be provided for each motor and generator.
( i ) A voltmeter and an ammeter must be provided that can be used for measuring voltage and current of each generator that is in operation. For each alternating-current generator a means for measuring frequency must also be provided. Additional control equipment and measuring instruments must be provided, if needed, to ensure satisfactory operation of each generator.
§ 900.404 Adoption. ( a ) The Commission may adopt a draft or final EIS or portion thereof (see 40 CFR 1506.3), including a programmatic EIS, prepared by another agency.
( b ) If the actions covered by the original EIS and the proposal are substantially the same, the Commission shall recirculate it as a final statement. Otherwise, the Commission shall treat the statement as a draft and recirculate it except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) Where the Commission is a cooperating agency, it may adopt the EIS of the lead agency without recirculating it when, after an independent review of the EIS, the Commission concludes that its comments and suggestions have been satisfied.
( d ) When the Commission adopts an EIS which is not final within the agency that prepared it, or when the action it assesses is the subject of a referral under 40 CFR part 1504, or when the EIS's adequacy is the subject of a judicial action which is not final, the Commission shall so specify.
§ 189.20-25 Chemical and explosive hazards. ( a ) If installed, the marine inspector shall examine the laboratories, storerooms, magazines, vans, and chests to insure that hazards are minimized.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Contracted Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John L. Corn, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/John L. Corn



JOHN L. CORN

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

Contracted Services, Inc.



March 31, 2008
###### Editorial Note on Part 160

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 160.151-9 Independent laboratory.

Tests and inspections that this subpart requires to be conducted by an independent laboratory must be conducted by an independent laboratory accepted by the Coast Guard under subpart 159.010 of part 159 of this chapter to perform such tests and inspections. A list of accepted laboratories is available from the Commandant.
Editorial Note on Part 161
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 161 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49238, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 161.011-10 EPIRB approval. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76703 , Sept. 18, 2024.
( a ) The Coast Guard approves the class of EPIRB's listed in § 161.011-5(a) of this subpart.
( b ) An application for type approval or type acceptance of an EPIRB should be submitted to the FCC in accordance with Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 2. When requested by the FCC, the Coast Guard reviews the test results in the application that concern installation and automatic operation (if required) of the EPIRB. The Coast Guard provides the results of the review to the manufacturer, and to the FCC for its use in acting upon the application.
( c ) Upon notification of the FCC type acceptance or type approval, the Commandant (CG-ENG) issues a certificate of approval for the EPIRB.
[CGD 80-024, 49 FR 40409, Oct. 16, 1984, as amended by CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50467, Sept. 29, 1995; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50734, Sept. 27, 1996]
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.049-6 Marking. ( a ) Each buoyant cushion must have the following information clearly marked in waterproof lettering: ( 1 ) In letters that can be read at a distance of 2 feet: Type IV Personal Flotation Device. Inspected and tested in accordance with U.S. Coast Guard regulations. (Name of buoyant material) buoyant material provides a minimum buoyant force of 20 lb. Dry out thoroughly when wet. Approved for use on recreational boats only as a throwable device. U.S. Coast Guard Approval No. 160.049/(assigned manufacturer's No.)/(Revision No.); (Model No.). (Name and address of manufacturer or distributor.). (Lot No.). (Size; width, thickness, and length, including both top and bottom for trapezoidal cushions.).
( 2 ) In letters that are distinctively set off or larger than all other marking, and are at least one-fourth of an inch in height: WARNING: DO NOT WEAR ON BACK
( b ) *Waterproofness of marking.* Marking for buoyant cushions shall be sufficiently waterproof so that after 72 hours submergence in water, it will withstand vigorous rubbing by hand while wet without the printed matter becoming illegible.
[CGFR 65-37, 30 FR 11588, Sept. 10, 1965, as amended by CGFR 70-143, 35 FR 19964, Dec. 30, 1970; CGD 72-163R, 38 FR 8119, Mar. 28, 1973; CGD 75-008, 43 FR 9771, Mar. 9, 1978; CGD 92-045, 58 FR 41608, Aug. 4, 1993; CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51213, Sept. 30, 1997]
G-10(A) Applications and Solicitations Model Form (Credit Cards) 

Interest Rates and Interest Charges 

Annual Percentage Rate [Purchase rate] 

(APR) for Purchases 

[Description that rate varies and how it is determined, if applicable] 

APR for Balance Transfers [Balance transfer rate] 

[Description that rate varies and how it is determined, if applicable] 

[Statement about balance transfer fee and cross reference, if applicable] 

[Payment allocation notice, if applicable] 

APR for Cash Advances [Cash advance rate] 

[Description that rate varies and how it is determined, if applicable] 

[Statement about cash advance fee and cross reference, if applicable] 

[Payment allocation notice, if applicable] 

Penalty APR and When it 

Applies 

[Penalty rate] 

[Description of events that may result in the penalty rate] 

[Description of how long penalty rate may apply] 

[Minimum Interest 

Charge]/[Minimum 

Charge] 

[Description of minimum interest charge or minimum charge] 

Grace Period on 

Purchases 

[Description of grace period for purchases or statement that no grace period applies] 

Website for Additional 

Information 

[Reference to Board’s website] 

Fees 

[Annual Fee]/[Set-up and 

Maintenance Fees] 

[Notice of available credit, if applicable] 

[Description of fees for availability or issuance of credit, such as an annual fee, if 

applicable] 

Transaction Fees 

• Balance Transfer 

• Cash Advance 

[Description of balance transfer fee] 

[Description of cash advance fee] 

Penalty Fees 

• Late Payment 

• Over-the-Credit Limit 

• Returned Payment 

[Description of late payment fee] [Cross reference to penalty rate, if applicable] 

[Description of over-the-credit limit fee] [Cross reference to penalty rate, if applicable] 

[Description of returned payment fee] [Cross reference to penalty rate, if applicable] 

Other Fees 

• Required [insert name 

of required insurance, 

or debt cancellation or 

suspension coverage] 

[Description of cost of insurance, or debt cancellation or suspension plans] [Cross 

reference to additional information, if applicable] 

Balance Computation Method: [Description of balance computation method]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 5, 2016

No. 04-16-00288-CV

CHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION D/B/A CHRISTUS SPOHN 

HOSPITAL ALICE,

Appellant

v.

Aundria HINOJOSA and Florencio Hinojosa, V, Individually as Wrongful Death Beneficiaries 

of Florencio Hinojosa, VI, Deceased and on Behalf of Florencio Hinojosa, VI, deceased,

Appellees

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-07-54935-CV

Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding

ORDER

 Appellant’s reply brief is due August 15, 2016. Appellant has filed an unopposed motion 

to extend time to file the reply brief by ten days. We GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER

appellant to file the reply brief on or before August 25, 2016.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of August, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# C_2013156EN.01004102.xml

| 1.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 April 2013 — Peek & Cloppenburg v OHIM — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek & Cloppenburg)

(Case T-507/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark Peek & Cloppenburg - Earlier national commercial name Peek & Cloppenburg - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 156/76

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Peek & Cloppenburg KG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: initially S. Abrar, then P. Lange, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Peek & Cloppenburg (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: A. Renck, V. von Bomhard, T. Heitmann, M. Petersenn, lawyers, and I. Fowler, solicitor)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 February 2011 (Case R 262/2005-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Peek & Cloppenburg and Peek & Cloppenburg KG.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Peek & Cloppenburg KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Peek & Cloppenburg KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 362, 10.12.2011.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         2834411
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   378822
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       100873692
<DEPRECIATION>                                  480809
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               104387289
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4587297
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         32150
<OTHER-SE>                                    25985765
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 104387289
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2425695
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1388365
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              967363
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  69967
<INCOME-TAX>                                     69967
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              69967
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     69967
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
  LORAL
    SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
    COMPUTATION OF DEFICIENCY OF EARNINGS TO COVER FIXED
    CHARGES
  Successor Registrant



Predecessor RegistrantFor the Period



For the PeriodOctober 2,



January 1,Year Ended


2005 to



2005 to



Year Ended



Year Ended



Year EndedDecember 31,


December 31,



October 1,



December 31,



December 31,



December 31,2006


2005



2005(3)



2004



2003



2002Income (loss) from continuing
    operations before income taxes, equity income (losses) in
    affiliates and minority interest

$
30,117


$
(5,395
)


$
(65,570
)


$
(207,852
)


$
(368,355
)


$
(237,540
)Plus fixed charges:Interest expense


25,961



4,408




3,982




3,904




28,223




51,185Interest component of rent
    expense(1)


6,824



1,625




4,949




9,059




10,402




15,380Less: capitalized interest


(2,512
)












(957
)



(14.143
)



(10,293
)Earnings available to cover fixed
    charges

$
60,390


$
638



$
(56,639
)


$
(195,846
)


$
(343,873
)


$
(181,268
)Fixed
    charges(2)

$
(73,767
)

$
(8,700
)


$
(8,931
)


$
(12,963
)


$
(45,345
)


$
(155,751
)Deficiency of earnings to cover
    fixed charges

$
13,377


$
8,062



$
65,570



$
208,809



$
389,218



$
337,019     (1)
    
    The interest component of rent expense is deemed to be
    approximately 25% of total rent expense.(2)
    
    For 2006, dividends on the Loral Skynet Preferred Stock have
    been
    grossed-up
    using a normalized effective tax rate of 39.5%.(3)
    
    Does not reflect the effect of the gain on the discharge of
    pre-petition obligations and fresh-start adjustments, and the
    interest expense and income tax benefit recognized in connection
    with the Plan of Reorganization.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). E N / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T MAR K T . MUR R AY , P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. K R A I G N E W M A N ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 35702 D . C. N o . 3 : 0 7 - c v - 0 5 2 1 5 - RBL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on R ona l d B . L e i ght on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry16, 2010 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , G O U L D , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M a rk T . M urr a yappe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s s um m a ryj udgm e nt i n f a vorof de f e nda ntK r a i g N e w m a n i n M urr a y ’ s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng m al i ci ou s prose cut i on . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 28 U . S . C . § 1 29 1. W e r evi ew 

# FI LED MA R 05 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSE N / Res ea r ch 08- 35702 2 d e n o v o s u m m a ryju d g m e n t o n th e b a s is o f qu a lif ie dim m u n ity . Cas e v . Ki t s ap C ou nt y Sheri f f’s D ep’t , 2 4 9 F. 3 d9 2 1 , 9 2 5 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 1 ) . W e a f f i rm. T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r lyc o n c lu d e dth a t N e w m a n h a dq u a lif ie dim m u n ity fr om M urray’ s c l ai m of m al i ci ou s prose cut i on because the re cord i nd i ca t es that th e r e w a s p r o b ab le c au s e to is s u e as e a r c h w a rr a n t a n da rr e s t M u rr a y . See Mi l l s v . G raves , 9 3 0 F .2 d7 2 9 , 7 3 1 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 1 ) ( n o tin g th a t “[ q u a lif ie d ] im m u n ityw ill b e l o sto n l y w h ere th e w arran tap p l i cat i o n i s so l ack i n g i n i n d i ci a o f p ro b ab l e cau se as t o render offi ci albel i ef i n i t s e xi st ence un re as on abl e” ). A FFI R M ED .
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the
"Form 10-Q") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").

     I, Heather D. Brolick, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer,
certify that to my knowledge:

     (i)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

Dated: November 14, 2008


                                        /s/ Heather D. Brolick
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Heather D. Brolick
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 1997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-188]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice; Announcing an Open Meeting of the 
Board of Directors

Time and Date: The meeting of the Board of Directors is scheduled to 
begin at 10 a.m. on Thursday, January 18, 2007.

Place: Board Room, First Floor, Federal Housing Finance Board, 1625 Eye 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006.

Status: The meeting will be open to the public.

Matter to be Considered:
    Appointment of Federal Home Loan Bank Directors.

Contact Person For More Information: Shelia Willis, Paralegal 
Specialist, Office of General Counsel, at 202-408-2876 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3f48565353564c4c7f5957595d11585049"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="80f7e9ecece9f3f3c0e6e8e6e2aee7eff6">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 12, 2007.

    By the Federal Housing Finance Board.
John P. Kennedy,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 07-188 Filed 1-12-07; 3 pm]
BILLING CODE 6725-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

RYAN BROWN, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 14-13922 

OAKLAND COUNTY JAIL, HON. TERRENCE G. BERG 

 HON. R. STEVEN WHALEN 

Defendant. 

 / 

OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION (DKT. 26) 

This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen’s 

August 12, 2016 Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 26), recommending that 

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute (Dkt. 19) be DENIED. 

The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. 

The law provides that either party may serve and file written objections “[w]ithin 

fourteen days after being served with a copy” of a report and recommendation. 

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district court will make a “de novo determination of those 

portions of the report . . . to which objection is made.” Id. Where, as here, neither 

party objects to the report, the district court is not obligated to independently 

review the record. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985). The Court will 

therefore accept the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation of August 12, 2016 

as this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. 

4:14-cv-13922-TGB-RSW Doc # 29 Filed 09/06/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 96
2 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Whalen’s Report 

and Recommendation of August 12, 2016 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to 

Prosecute is DENIED. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 6, 2016 s/Terrence G. Berg 

TERRENCE G. BERG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that this Order was electronically submitted on September 6, 

2016, using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to all parties. 

 s/A. Chubb 

Case Manager 

4:14-cv-13922-TGB-RSW Doc # 29 Filed 09/06/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 97