alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012025EN.01007001.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/70

---

Action brought on 8 November 2011 — ZZ v Commission.

(Case F-117/11)

(2012/C 25/136)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Vogel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the Office for administration and payment of individual rights determining the applicant’s retirement pension rights and of the calculation of the number of years of pensionable service to be taken into account to determine those rights.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision adopted by the appointing authority on 28 July 2011 rejecting the complaint made by the applicant on 3 June 2011, seeking annulment of the general implementing provisions of Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations, adopted on 3 March 2011, in particular Article 9 of those general provisions, and which the appointing authority considered to be directed against the individual decision notified to the applicant on 24 May 2011, proposing a new calculation of the years of pensionable service corresponding, in the Community pension scheme, to the actuarial equivalent of the retirement pension rights acquired by the applicant under the Belgian national scheme; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision adopted by the appointing authority on 28 July 2011 rejecting the complaint made by the applicant on 3 June 2011, seeking annulment of the general implementing provisions of Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations, adopted on 3 March 2011, in particular Article 9 of those general provisions, and which the appointing authority considered to be directed against the individual decision notified to the applicant on 24 May 2011, proposing a new calculation of the years of pensionable service corresponding, in the Community pension scheme, to the actuarial equivalent of the retirement pension rights acquired by the applicant under the Belgian national scheme;

| — | in so far as it is necessary, annul also the abovementioned decision of 24 May 2011 and, if necessary, pursuant to Article 277 of the EEC Treaty, the general implementing provisions of 3 March 2011, in particular Article 9 of those provisions; |
| --- | --- |

—

in so far as it is necessary, annul also the abovementioned decision of 24 May 2011 and, if necessary, pursuant to Article 277 of the EEC Treaty, the general implementing provisions of 3 March 2011, in particular Article 9 of those provisions;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
#### JACK I. STONE AND SIDNEY KULICK, PLAINTIFFS, v. HENRY J. DEWARNS, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, GUARDIAN AD LITEM, HENRY DEWARNS, DEFENDANT.

Submitted January 25, 1929

Decided October 14, 1929.

*872Before Gummebe, Chief Justice, and Justices Paekeb and Bodine.

Eor the plaintiffs, *Aaron L. Simon.*

Eor the defendant, *George E. Cutley.*

Peb Cueiam.

This case arises out of a collision between two automobiles on the Hudson county boulevard. The plaintiff Stone with plaintiff Kulick as a passenger was going south; and the defendant, who was headed north, proceeded to turn to the west to his own léft into a street called Traphagen street, which turn would take him across the front of the Stone car. Each driver undertook to cast the blame upon the other, but the fact is that the Stone car hit the defendant’s car on the right run board. Stone sued for damage to his car and loss of profits from its use, and Kulick sued for personal injuries. The defendant counter-claimed against Stone for damages to defendant’s car. The jury found no cause of action for either plaintiff against the defendant, and no cause of action for defendant on his counter-claim. There is no rule to show cause as to Stone.

Eor the plaintiff Kulick it is argued on this rule that inasmuch as the jury found against Dewarns’ counter-claim they necessarily found that the defendant was guilty of contributory negligence, leading to the conclusion, and in support of this testimony, was admitted to show that the defendant agreed to pay for the damage to Stone’s car. This argument seems sound unless we are to take the verdict as meaning that the jury considered neither party to have been negligent. The testimony, however, hardly supports any such theory of the case, and in our judgment, the rule as to Kulick should be made absolute. The ease is ngt unlike *Hoffman*v. *Smith and*Apgar, 6 *N. J. Mis. R.*1090; and the legal situation of the plaintiff is similar to that discussed in *Lange*v. *New York, Susquehanna and Western Railroad Co.,*89 *N. J. L.*604.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.ss1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Trans-Orient Petroleum Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended July 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date January 30, 2004 (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated January 30, 2004

|"Peter Loretto"                       
|--------------------------------------
|                                      
|Peter Loretto, Chief Executive officer
|                                      
|"Garth Johnson"                       
|                                      
|Garth Johnson, Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 20-F or as a separate disclosures document.

---
#### Alida F. Flint, *Appellant, v.*Calvin H. Bell and others, *Respondents*.

Motion for reargument denied.
#### § 169.826 Steering, communications and control.

The master shall test the vessel's steering gear, signaling whistle, engine controls, and communications equipment prior to getting underway.
# C_2014380EN.01000502.xml

| 27.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 380/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 380/5

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2014 — Greece v Commission

(Case T-425/11) (1)

1

((State aid - Greek casinos - System providing for a levy of 80 % of the admissions of different amounts - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market - Concept of State aid - Advantage))

2014/C 380/06

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: P. Mylonopoulos and K. Boskovits, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, H. van Vliet and M. Konstantinidis, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2011/716/EU of 24 May 2011, on State aid to certain Greek casinos C–16/10 (ex NN 22/10, ex CP 318/09) implemented by the Hellenic Republic (OJ 2011 L 285, p. 25).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | annuls Commission Decision 2011/716/EU of 24 May 2011, on State aid to certain Greek casinos C–16/10 (ex NN 22/10, ex CP 318/09) implemented by the Hellenic Republic; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annuls Commission Decision 2011/716/EU of 24 May 2011, on State aid to certain Greek casinos C–16/10 (ex NN 22/10, ex CP 318/09) implemented by the Hellenic Republic;

| 2. | orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Hellenic Republic. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Hellenic Republic.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.

1

---
#### Christian Pfeiffer and others, *Appellants, v.*Patrick Moore and others, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.133-21 Operation and maintenance instructions. ( a ) Each release mechanism must have operation and maintenance instructions that— ( 1 ) Follows the general format and content specified in IMO MSC.1 Circ. 1205 (incorporated by reference, see § 160.133-5 of this subpart); and
( 2 ) Includes a checklist for use in monthly, external visual inspections of the release mechanism.
( b ) The release mechanism manufacturer must make the manual required by paragraph (a) of this section available in English to purchasers of a release mechanism approved by the Coast Guard.
( c ) The operation and maintenance instructions required by paragraph (a) of this section may be combined with similar material for survival craft and rescue boats, and their launching systems.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2017 (the "Form 10-Q") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").



I, Heather D. Brolick, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Issuer, certify that to my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
                                         13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
                                         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 15, 2017



| | /s/ Heather D. Brolick               
| | -------------------------------------
| | Heather D. Brolick                   
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.170-17 Marking and labeling. ( a ) Each hook body of a release mechanism must be marked with a plate or label permanently affixed in a conspicuous place readily accessible for inspection and sufficiently durable to withstand continuous exposure to environmental conditions at sea for the life of the release mechanism.
( b ) The plate or label must be in English, but may also be in other languages.
( c ) The plate or label must contain the— ( 1 ) Manufacturer's name and model identification;
( 2 ) Name of the independent laboratory that witnessed the prototype or production tests;
( 3 ) Serial number of the release mechanism;
( 4 ) U.S. Coast Guard approval number;
( 5 ) Month and year of manufacture;
( 6 ) Safe working load of the release mechanism;
( 7 ) Number of the test certificate in accordance with IMO Revised recommendation on testing, part 2/6.2.2 (incorporated by reference, see § 160.170-5 of this subpart); and
( 8 ) Word “SOLAS.”
# C_2013225EN.01008304.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/83 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/83

---

Order of the General Court of 10 June 2013 — Barloworld v Commission

(Case T-459/11) (1)

1

2013/C 225/189

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 305, 15.10.2011.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The MONY Group Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard Daddario, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The MONY Group Inc., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that (1) the Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The MONY Group Inc.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    RICHARD DADDARIO
|Richard Daddario       



May 10, 2004



This statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to
the Report.
§ 108.451 CO2 storage. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each cylinder of a CO2 system must be outside each space protected by the system and in a location that would be accessible if a fire occurred in any space protected by the system.
( b ) A CO2 system that has a CO2 supply of 136 kilograms (300 pounds) or less may have one or more cylinders in the space protected by the system if the space has a heat detection system to activate the system automatically in addition to the remote and manual controls required by this subpart.
( c ) Each space that contains cylinders of a CO2 system must be ventilated and designed to prevent an ambient temperature of more than 54 °C. (130 °F.)
( d ) Each cylinder in a CO2 system must be securely fastened, supported, protected from damage, in an accessible location, and capable of removal from that location.
( e ) Each unit must have a means for weighing cylinders of a CO2 system.
( f ) A cylinder in a CO2 system may not be mounted in a position that is inclined more than 30° from a vertical position, except that a cylinder having flexible or bent siphon tubes may be mounted in a position that is inclined up to 80° from the vertical. The bottom of each cylinder when mounted must be at least 5 centimeters (2 inches) from the deck.
( g ) If a cylinder does not have a check valve on its independent cylinder discharge, it must have a plug or cap to close the outlet when the cylinder is moved.
[CGD 73-251, 43 FR 56808, Dec. 4, 1978, as amended by CGD 84-044, 53 FR 7749, Mar. 10, 1988]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael C. Frederick, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                                                             
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|DATE: May 11, 2007 |  |  |  | BY: |  | /s/ Michael C. Frederick                                    
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Michael C. Frederick                                        
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
§ 131.875 Lifejackets, immersion suits, and ring buoys. ( a ) Each lifejacket, immersion suit, and ring life buoy must be marked in block capital letters with the vessel's name.
( b ) Each container for lifejackets and immersion suits must be marked in letters and numbers at least 50 millimeters (2 inches) high with the number, identity, or IMO symbol specified by IMO Resolution A.760(18), and size of the items stowed inside.
( c ) Each ring buoy on a vessel in ocean service must be marked in block capital letters with the name of the port whose marking on the stern of the vessel is required by § 67.123 of this chapter.
( d ) Each stowage site for a ring buoy must be marked “LIFE BUOY” or marked with the IMO symbol.
( e ) Each lifejacket must be marked with Type I retro-reflective material approved under subpart 164.018 of this chapter. The arrangement of the retro-reflective material must comply with IMO Resolution A.658(16).
( f ) Each ring life buoy must be marked with Type I or II retro-reflective material approved under subpart 164.018 of this chapter. The arrangement of the retro-reflective material must comply with IMO Resolution A.658(16).
# C_2012025EN.01003301.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/33

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikrateias lodged on 3 November 2011 — Enosis Epangelmation Asfaliston Ellados (EEAE), Sillogos Asfalistikon Praktoron Nomou Attikis (SPATE), Panellinios Sillogos Asfalistikon Simboulon (PSAS), Sindesmos Ellinon Mesiton Asfaliseon (SEMA), Panellinios Sindesmos Sintoniston Asfalistikon Simboulon (PSAS) v Ipourgos Anaptixis and Omospondias Asfalistikon Sillogon Ellados

(Case C-555/11)

(2012/C 25/61)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Simvoulio tis Epikrateias (Council of State)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Enosis Epangelmation Asfaliston Ellados (Hellenic Association of Insurance Professionals, EEAE), Sillogos Asfalistikon Praktoron Nomou Attikis (Attica Association of Insurance Agents, SPATE), Panellinios Sillogos Asfalistikon Simboulon (Hellenic Association of Insurance Advisors, PSAS), Sindesmos Ellinon Mesiton Asfaliseon (Hellenic Insurance Broker Association, SEMA), Panellinios Sindesmos Sintoniston Asfalistikon Simboulon (Hellenic Association of Insurance Advisor Coordinators, PSAS).

Defendants: Ipourgos Anaptixis (Minister for Development), Omospondias Asfalistikon Sillogon Ellados (Federation of Hellenic Insurance Associations)

Question referred

Does the provision of the second subparagraph of Article 2(3) of Directive 2002/92/EC, which states: ‘These activities (those listed in the first subparagraph of that provision) when undertaken by an insurance undertaking or an employee of an insurance undertaking who is acting under the responsibility of the insurance undertaking shall not be considered as insurance mediation’, mean that an employee of an insurance undertaking who does not have the qualifications required under Article 4(1) of that directive is permitted to pursue the activity of insurance mediation on an incidental basis, and not as his main professional activity, even if that employee does not have an employment relationship with the undertaking, which however supervises his actions, or does the directive permit that activity to be pursued only within the framework of an employment relationship?

---
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.136-4 Approval procedures. ( a ) Manufacturers that desire type approval should submit a written notice to the Commandant (CG-ENG-4) describing the product and its intended uses. The Commandant will evaluate this information and notify the manufacturer of the product's suitability for testing. The manufacturer should then contract directly with an accepted independent laboratory to perform the required tests and inspections.
( b ) Upon completion of the required testing and inspections, the manufacturer must submit either a written request for type approval to the Commandant (CG-ENG-4), United States Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, or electronically submit a request to *typeapproval@uscg.mil*. The request must indicate the name and address of the manufacturer, all product designations, and the address of all manufacturing facilities. The request must include a copy of the final fire test report and the production inspection procedures. From the information submitted, the Commandant determines whether or not the product is acceptable for type approval. If the product is determined to be acceptable, a type approval certificate valid for a 5-year period will be issued. If the product is not accepted, the manufacturer will be notified of the reasons why.
EX-10.14





 Exhibit 10.14 

Spousal Consent Letter 
 I, Lili Sun, with
ID number of [REDACTED], am the legal spouse of Leslie Yu (passport number [REDACTED]). 
 To my knowledge: (i) Leslie Yu entrusted me to hold 25.7264%
equity in Beijing Quhuo Technology Co., Ltd.; and (ii) Leslie Yu entrusted me to sign the Exclusive Call Option Agreement, the Power of Attorney and the Equity Interest Pledge Agreement with Beijing Quhuo Information
Technology Co., Ltd. and other shareholders of Beijing Quhuo Technology Co., Ltd. on August 23, 2019 (The foregoing agreements and any subsequent written amendment, supplement or confirmation (if any) made by the parties thereto are hereinafter
collectively referred to as the “Quhuo VIE Agreements”). 
 I hereby confirm and irrevocably undertake that: 

 

	1.	 The equity of Beijing Quhuo Technology Co., Ltd. that Leslie Yu entrusted me to hold (the
“Equity”) and all rights and interests carried by it are personal assets of Leslie Yu, and not joint property of Leslie Yu and me. I do not enjoy any rights and interests of the Equity, nor will I raise any claim or file any
lawsuits with respect to such Equity or any interest carried by it in the future; 


  

	2.	 The Equity will be disposed of in accordance with the Quhuo VIE Agreements that Leslie Yu entrusted me to sign.
I undertake that I will fully cooperate at any time in the performance of the Quhuo VIE Agreements. 


  

	3.	 I undertake that I have never participated, and will not actually participate, in the management or other
voting matters of Beijing Quhuo Technology Co., Ltd. 


  

	4.	 I undertake and warrant that in no event I will have any action or move, whether direct or indirect, active or
passive, which may contradict the purpose or intention of the Quhuo VIE Agreements; and 


  

	5.	 I further undertake that if I actually acquire any equity in Beijing Quhuo Technology Co., Ltd. (including but
not limited to the equity held by me on behalf of Leslie Yu) for any reason, I shall be bound by the Quhuo VIE Agreements and fulfil my obligations under the Quhuo VIE Agreements as a shareholder of Beijing Quhuo Technology Co., Ltd., and for this
purpose, I will sign a series of written documents in the same form and with the same content as that of the Quhuo VIE Agreements at any time the Beijing Quhuo Information Technology Co., Ltd. requests. 



This consent letter shall enter into force immediately upon signature by me and shall remain in force. 

I hereby make the above undertakings. 
  

			
	Signature:	 	 /s/ Lili Sun

	
	Date: August 23, 2019
#### § 169.817 Master to instruct ship's company.

The master shall conduct drills and give instructions as necessary to insure that all hands are familiar with their duties as specified in the station bill.