alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

20697 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 79 

Wednesday, April 25, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8130 of April 20, 2007 

National Crime Victims’ Rights Week, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

National Crime Victims’ Rights Week is an opportunity to underscore our 

commitment to protecting the rights of crime victims and to recognize those 

who bring hope and healing to these individuals and their families. During 

this week, we especially remember and mourn the victims of the senseless 

acts of violence at Virginia Tech. A grieving Nation honors the innocent 

lives lost in this tragedy, and we pray for the families of the victims. 

My Administration is committed to helping safeguard our communities and 

to ensuring that the rights of those who have been victimized by crime 

are protected. My Family Justice Center Initiative, announced in 2003, is 

now providing assistance and services for victims of domestic violence 

at centers nationwide. Additionally, last year I signed into law the Adam 

Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, which helps protect our 

youth by increasing the penalties for crimes against children and creating 

a National Child Abuse Registry. My Administration also supports a Crime 

Victims’ Rights Amendment to the Constitution to further protect the basic 

rights of crime victims. 

During National Crime Victims’ Rights Week and throughout the year, we 

remember and are grateful to our Nation’s victim service providers, volunteers, law enforcement, and community organizations that support victims 

of crime through their commitment and compassion. To find out more 

information about victims’ rights and volunteer opportunities, individuals 

may visit www.crimevictims.gov. Together, we can help ensure that crime 

victims have the rights and protections they deserve. 

NOW, THEREFORE I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim April 22 through April 

28, 2007, as National Crime Victims’ Rights Week. I encourage all Americans 

to help raise awareness and promote the cause of victims’ rights in their 

communities. 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with NOTICES4
20698 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 25, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twentieth day 

of April, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 07–2066 

Filed 4–24–07; 8:52 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with NOTICES4GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
Order entered November 15, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00504-CV

CARLETTA GUILLORY, ET AL., Appellants

V.

WILLIAM E. DIETRICH, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 94304-CC2

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ November 13, 2018 unopposed motion for an extension of 

time to file a reply brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to December 14, 2018.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
----

*go to a larger version of Plate 7 (5.3MB)**go to metadata for this field activity, A-1-98-HW*

----

----

----

SusanA. Cochran

U.S. Department of the Interior,U.S.Geological Survey,Western RegionCoastal and Marine Geology
# C_2011120EN.01001203.xml

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/12

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 2 March 2011 — Westfälisch-Lippischer Sparkassen -und Giroverband v Commission

(Case T-22/11 R)

(Application for interim measures - Manifestly inadmissible)

2011/C 120/31

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Westfälisch-Lippischer Sparkassen -und Giroverband (Münster, Germany) (represented by: A.Rosenfeld and I. Liebach, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, B. Martenczuk and T. Maxian Rusche, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the Commission’s decision of 21 December 2010 C(2010) 9525 final State aid, MC 8/2009 and C 43/2009 — Germany — WestLB transfers, in so far as it follows that Westdeutsche Immobilien Bank AG’s new operations after 15 February 2011 must be terminated.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for suspension of operation is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for suspension of operation is rejected.

| 2. | There is no need to adjudicate on Westdeutsche Immobilien Bank AG’s application for leave to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to adjudicate on Westdeutsche Immobilien Bank AG’s application for leave to intervene.

| 3. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Costs are reserved.

---
#### Wise Memorial Hospital Association, appellant, v. Lacey E. Peyton, appellee.

Filed November 13, 1915.

No. 18416.

Husband and Wife: Necessaries: Liability oe Husband. A husband who is living apart from his wife and is paying temporary alimony awarded to her by the court in a suit for divorce is not liable to a third person for necessaries furnished to her, the former being chargeable with knowledge of those facts, and the adequacy of the temporary alimony not being subject to question by a stranger.

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: George A. Day, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*John M. Maofarland*and *A. J. Einnersley,*for appellant.

*Brome &*Brome, *W. J. Connell*and *J. E. von*Dorn, *contra.*

Rose, J. •

Between May 21, 1912, and June 4, 1912, Cordelia Peyton was a patient in plaintiff’s hospital, and this is an action against her husband to recover a balance of $85 for hospital services and medicines. The case was dismissed, and plaintiff has appealed. .

The substance of the defense pleaded is: Though defendant was the husband of the patient, she was living apart from him. A suit on her behalf for a divorce and for alimony was pending. She had been awarded a temporary allowance of $75 a month which he had paid regularly. He never obligated himself to pay his wife’s indebtedness to the hospital. The defense thus outlined is fully established by the evidence and justifies the dismissal of the action. A husband who is living apart from his wife and is paying temporary alimony awarded to her by the court in a suit for divorce is not liable to a third person for necessaries furnished to her, the former being *49chargeable with knowledge of those facts, and the adequacy of the temporary alimony not being subject to question by a stranger. *Hare v.*Gibson, 32 Ohio St. 33. The judgment is right and is

Affirmed.

Fawcett, J., not sitting.
```

[Federal Register: January 11, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 6)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 1269]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr11ja10-1]                         


========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================



[[Page 1269]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 980

[Doc. No. AMS-FV-08-0018; FV08-980-1 C]

 
Vegetable Import Regulations; Modification of Potato Import 
Regulations; Correction

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service is correcting a final rule 
that appeared in the Federal Register of December 10, 2009. The rule 
modified the import regulations for Irish potatoes and made minor 
administrative changes to the potato, onion, and tomato import 
regulations to update informational references. This document corrects 
two Code of Federal Regulation citations in the informational 
references that were cited incorrectly.

DATES: Effective Date: January 11, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barry Broadbent or Gary D. Olson, 
Northwest Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration 
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1220 SW. Third Avenue, 
Suite 385, Portland, OR 97204; Telephone: (503) 326-2724, Fax: (503) 
326-7440, or E-mail: Barry.Broadbent@usda.gov or GaryD.Olson@usda.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. AMS-FV-08-0018; FV08-980-1 FR in 
the Federal Register of Thursday, December 10, 2009 (74 FR 65390), the 
following corrections are made:


Sec.  980.117  [Corrected]

0
1. On page 65394, in the second column, amendatory instruction 5(c) is 
revised to read ``Amend paragraph (h) by removing the references `(7 
CFR 2851.3195 through 2851.3209),' `(7 CFR 2851.3955 through 
2851.3970),' and `(7 CFR 2851.2830 through 2851.2854)' and by adding in 
their places the references `(7 CFR 51.3195 through 51.3209),' `(7 CFR 
51.3955 through 51.3970),' and `(7 CFR 51.2830 through 51.2854)', 
respectively.''

    Dated: January 6, 2010.
David R. Shipman,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-314 Filed 1-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
```
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3170

___________

United States of America, *

*

Plaintiff-Appellee, *

*

v. *

* Appeal from the United States

William H. Weddell; * District Court for the District

* of South Dakota.

Defendant, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Yankton Sioux Tribe, Marty, South *

Dakota, *

*

Garnishee-Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: May 11, 1999

Filed: May 20, 1999

___________

Before McMILLIAN, HEANEY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Yankton Sioux Tribe appeals the district court's denial of the Tribe's motion to

dismiss the Government's postjudgment garnishment of a tribal employee under the

Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act on the basis of the Tribe's sovereign immunity.

Having reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we are satisfied the district court's

ruling that the Act waives the Tribe's sovereign immunity was correct. We also
-2-

conclude that an extended discussion is not warranted. We thus affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 78 (Tuesday, April 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2036]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Eye Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; NEI Loan Repayment Program Applications.
    Date: May 1, 2007.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 11 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Anne E. Schaffner, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Research, National Eye 
Institute, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, MSC 9300, Bethesda, MD 
20892-9300, (301) 451-2020, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8c9cddbe8c6cdc186c6c1c086cfc7de"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5f3e3a2c1f313a367131363771383029">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, 
Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 17, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-2036 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
- 2576
- 2577
- 2578
- 2579
- 2580
- 2581
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 3
Federal Reserve Bank of: Philadelphia

## Filings received during the week ending February 4, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 189.43-1 When required. ( a ) Each fuel oil tank with at least one side integral to the vessel's hull and located within the hull (“integral fuel oil tank”) is subject to inspection as provided in this section. The owner or operator of the vessel shall have the tanks cleaned out and gas freed as necessary to permit internal examination of the tank or tanks designated by the marine inspector. The owner or operator shall arrange for an examination of the fuel tanks of each vessel during an internal structural examination at intervals not to exceed five years.
( b ) Integral non-double-bottom fuel oil tanks need not be cleaned out and internally examined if the marine inspector is able to determine by external examination that the general condition of the tanks is satisfactory.
( c ) Double-bottom fuel oil tanks on vessels less than 10 years of age need not be cleaned out and internally examined if the marine inspector is able to determine by external examination that the general condition of the tanks is satisfactory.
( d ) All double-bottom fuel oil tanks on vessels 10 years of age or older but less than 15 years of age need not be cleaned out and internally examined if the marine inspector is able to determine by internal examination of at least one forward double-bottom fuel oil tank, and by external examination of all other double-bottom fuel oil tanks on the vessel, that the general condition of the tanks is satisfactory.
( e ) All double-bottom fuel oil tanks on vessels 15 years of age or older need not be cleaned out and internally examined if the marine inspector is able to determine by internal examination of at least one forward, one amidships, and one aft double-bottom fuel oil tank, and by external examination of all other double-bottom fuel oil tanks on the vessel, that the general condition of the tanks is satisfactory.
[CGD 84-024, 52 FR 39657, Oct. 23, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 32232, Aug. 24, 1988]
# C_2013071EN.01001702.xml

| 9.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2013 — Fon Wireless v OHIM — nfon (nfon)

(Case T-283/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark nfon - Earlier Community trade mark fon and earlier national word mark FON - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Application for alteration)

2013/C 71/26

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fon Wireless Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented initially by F. Brandolini Kujman, and then by L. Montoya Terán, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: nfon AG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: S. Schweyer, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 March 2011 (Case R 1017/2009-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Fon Wireless Ltd and nfon AG.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | alters the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 18 March 2011 (Case R 1017/2009-4) to the effect that the action brought by nfon AG before the Board of Appeal is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

alters the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 18 March 2011 (Case R 1017/2009-4) to the effect that the action brought by nfon AG before the Board of Appeal is dismissed;

| 2. | orders OHIM to bear its own costs and those incurred by Fon Wireless Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders OHIM to bear its own costs and those incurred by Fon Wireless Ltd;

| 3. | orders nfon to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

orders nfon to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.

1

---
§ 167.43-20 Shipboard inspections. ( a ) Each work vest shall be subject to examination by a marine inspector to determine its serviceability. If found to be satisfactory, it may be continued in service, but shall not be stamped by a marine inspector with a Coast Guard stamp. If a work vest is found not to be in a serviceable condition, then such work vest shall be removed from the vessel. If a work vest is beyond repair, it shall be destroyed or mutilated in the presence of a marine inspector so as to prevent its continued use as a work vest.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.066-1 Type. ( a ) Red aerial pyrotechnic distress signals specified by this subpart must be either self-contained or pistol launched, and either meteor or parachute assisted type.
( b ) [Reserved]
§ 672.20 Initial decision. ( a ) *Filing and contents.* The Presiding Officer shall issue and file with the Hearing Clerk an initial decision as soon as practicable after the period for filing reply briefs, if any, has expired. The initial decision shall contain findings of fact, conclusions regarding all material issues of law or discretion, the reasons for the findings and conclusions, a recommended civil penalty assessment or other sanction, if appropriate, and a proposed final order. Upon receipt of an initial decision, the Hearing Clerk shall forward a copy to all parties, and shall send the original, along with the record of the proceeding, to the Director.
( b ) *Amount of civil penalty.* If the Presiding Officer determines that a violation has occurred, he shall set the dollar amount of the recommended civil penalty in the initial decision in accordance with any criteria set forth in the Act, and must consider any civil penalty guidelines issued by NSF. If the Presiding Officer decides to assess a penalty different in amount from the penalty recommended in the complaint, he shall set forth in the initial decision the specific reasons for the increase or decrease. The Presiding Officer shall not raise a penalty from that recommended in the complaint if the respondent has defaulted.
( c ) *Effect of initial decision.* The initial decision of the Presiding Officer shall become the final order of the Agency within forty-five (45) days after its service upon the parties and without further proceedings unless ( 1 ) an appeal to the Director is filed by a party to the proceedings; or
( 2 ) the Director elects, sua sponte, to review the initial decision.
( d ) *Motion to reopen a hearing.* A motion to reopen a hearing to take further evidence must be made no later than twenty (20) days after service of the initial decision on the parties and shall ( 1 ) state the specific grounds upon which relief is sought;
( 2 ) state briefly the nature and purpose of the evidence to be adduced;
( 3 ) show that such evidence is not cumulative; and
( 4 ) show good cause why such evidence was not adduced at the hearing. The motion shall be made to the Presiding Officer and filed with the Hearing Clerk. Parties shall have ten (10) days following service to respond. The Presiding Officer shall grant or deny such motion as soon as practicable. The conduct of any proceeding which may be required as a result of the granting of any motion to reopen shall be governed by the provisions of the applicable sections of these rules. The filing of a motion to reopen a hearing shall automatically stay the running of all time periods specified under these Rules until such time as the motion is denied or the reopened hearing is concluded.