alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,352
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,896
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,056
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,064
<LOANS>                                     20,230
<ALLOWANCE>                                    170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,075
<DEPOSITS>                                  22,089
<SHORT-TERM>                                     0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            332
<LONG-TERM>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,653
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              25,075
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                411
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               26
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                24
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               461
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             254
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             254
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          207
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   11
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                147
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 64
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      43
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .32
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                3.40
<LOANS-NON>                                     11
<LOANS-PAST>                                     0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 11
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               169
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   11
<RECOVERIES>                                     1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              170
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           170
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0
        

</TABLE>
§ 131.905 Statutory penalties. ( a ) The marine-safety statutes and other statutes impose criminal and civil penalties for violating the applicable provisions of this subchapter. Possible sanctions include: ( 1 ) Assessment and collection of civil monetary penalty.
( 2 ) Criminal prosecution, where no loss of life results.
( 3 ) Criminal prosecution for manslaughter, where loss of life results from violating marine-safety statutes or regulations or from misconduct, negligence, or inattention to duty.
( 4 ) Libel against vessel.
( b ) 46 U.S.C. Chapter 77 allows, in addition to the foregoing, the suspension or revocation of credentials licenses, certificates, or documents issued by the Coast Guard, for incompetence, misconduct, or negligence or for violating marine-safety statutes or regulations.
[CGD 82-004 and CGD 86-074, 62 FR 49340, Sept. 19, 1997, as amended by USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11266, Mar. 16, 2009]
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.902 Expiration and invalidation of the Certificate of Compliance. ( a ) The Certificate of Compliance shows its expiration date.
( b ) The endorsement of a Certificate of Compliance under this part is invalid if the vessel does not have a valid IMO Certificate of Fitness.
( c ) The endorsement on a Certificate of Compliance invalidated under paragraph (b) of this section, becomes valid again once the ship has the IMO Certificate of Fitness revalidated or reissued.
Note:
See § 153.809 for procedures for having a Certificate of Compliance reissued.
[CGD 81-101, 52 FR 7784, Mar. 12, 1987; CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995; 60 FR 54106, Oct. 19, 1995; CGD 95-027, 61 FR 26009, May 23, 1996]
# C_2013313EN.01002202.xml

| 26.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2013 — Besselink v Council

(Case T-331/11) (1)

1

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Draft Council Decision authorising the Commission to negotiate the Accession Agreement of the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms - Exception relating to the protection of the public interest as regards international relations - Partial access - Obligation to state reasons - Application for measures of organisation of procedure or inquiry - Inadmissible)

2013/C 313/42

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Leonard Besselink (Utrecht, Netherlands) (represented by: O. Brouwer, J. Blockx and E. Raedts, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented: initially by C. Fekete, P. Plaza García and J. Herrmann, and subsequently by P. Plaza García, J. Herrmann and B. Driessen, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Paasivirta and P. Costa de Oliveira, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Council Decision of 1 April 2011 refusing access in full to document 9689/10, containing a draft Council Decision authorising the Commission to negotiate the Accession Agreement of the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the Council Decision of 1 April 2011 refusing full access to document 9689/10 in that it refuses access to Negotiating Directive No 5 and to the undisclosed parts of the requested document, which set out the principles laid down in the EU Treaty that should govern negotiations for the accession of the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950, or which only set out the questions to be addressed in the negotiations; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the Council Decision of 1 April 2011 refusing full access to document 9689/10 in that it refuses access to Negotiating Directive No 5 and to the undisclosed parts of the requested document, which set out the principles laid down in the EU Treaty that should govern negotiations for the accession of the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950, or which only set out the questions to be addressed in the negotiations;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.

1

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****United States--east coast,Virginia, Pamunkey and Mattaponi Rivers [and] York River, Yorktown to West Point[electronic resource].**
 
p0|p1|
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.418/7:12243/990

Item Number: 0191-B-13(online)

CGP systemNumber:000861637
August 17, 2018
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.072-1 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart establishes standards for distress flags for boats.
( b ) [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Certification of Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Pure Bioscience (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB/A as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael L. Krall, Chief Executive Officer
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

March 5, 2004                    /s/ Michael L. Krall
-------------------              -----------------------------------
                                 Michael L. Krall
                                 Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
§ 111.105-39 Additional requirements for vessels carrying vehicles with fuel in their tanks. Each vessel that carries a vehicle with fuel in its tank must meet the requirements of ABS Marine Vessel Rules (incorporated by reference; see 46 CFR 110.10-1), section 5C-10-4/3, except as follows: ( a ) If the ventilation requirements of ABS Steel Vessel Rules section 5-10-4/3 are not met, all installed electrical equipment must be suitable for a Class I, Division 1; Zone 0; or Zone 1 hazardous location.
( b ) If the vessel is fitted with an approved fixed gas detection system set at 25 percent the LEL, each item of the installed electrical equipment must meet the requirements for a Class I, Division 1; Class I, Division 2; Zone 0; Zone 1; or Zone 2 hazardous location.
[CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28285, June 4, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 23909, May 1, 1997; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65200, Oct. 31, 2008; USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16367, Mar. 16, 2023]
#### MARIO FOGLIO ET AL., RELATORS, v. MAYOR, ETC., CITY OF UNION CITY ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

Argued May 1, 1929

Decided July 18, 1929.

*680Before Justices Mintuen, Black and. Campbell.

For the relators, *Robert H. Brenner.*

For the respondents, *Andreiv 0. Wiltreich.*

Pee Curiam.

This is an application for a *mandamus*to compel the issuance of a building permit to relators to make certain alterations to a presently existing building on 100 New York avenue, in the city of Union Citjr, by moving such building forward to the street line, from which it noAV sets back thirty feet, and building an addition thereto.

We find nothing in the facts before us legally justifying the refusal to issue the permit in question and an order for the issuance of a peremptory *mandamus*as prayed for may be taken and entered.
# OK ir: ;44L IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 21-0005

IN RE THE MOTION OF LORNE

## arm DAUENHAUER FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

# FILED MAR i 6 2021
Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Suprerne Court 

## Staelo'ffbAlltra

Lorne Otto Dauenhauer has filed a motion for admission to the Bar ofthe State of Montana pursuant to Rule V ofthe Rules for Admission,Admission on Motion. The Bar Admissions Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Dauenhauer has provided the necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion under Rule V. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions Administrator,Lorne Otto Dauenhauer may be sworn in to the practice oflaw in the State ofMontana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office ofthe Clerk ofthe Montana Supreme Court. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to Petitioner and to the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this I L.'day ofMarch,2021.

ChiefJust' 03/16/2021

Case Number: PR 21-0005II—; / A 4 -) V. 4%--- Justices
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2173 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2173

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1009 Crystal Road in Island Falls, Maine, as the ``Carl B. Smith 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CARL B. SMITH POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1009 Crystal Road in Island Falls, Maine, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Carl B. Smith Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Carl B. 
Smith Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2173

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1009 Crystal Road in Island Falls, Maine, as the ``Carl B. Smith 
                             Post Office''.
```
**Exhibit 99.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**OF**

**WORLD FINANCIALNETWORK NATIONAL BANK, AS SERVICER OFWORLD FINANCIAL NETWORK CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST**

 

This certification is providedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies theannual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the “Form10-K”) of World Financial Network Credit Card Master Trust (the “Registrant”).

 

I,  Daniel Groomes, the Chief Financial Officer of the Servicer of theRegistrant certify that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(i) the Form 10-K fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

 

(ii) the information contained in the Form10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| Dated:   March 31, 2003 |                    |   |
|------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                         |                    |   |
|                         | /s/ Daniel T. Groomes   |   |
|                         | Name: Daniel T. Groomes |   |
|                         | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

 

Subscribed and sworn to before me

this 31th day of March, 2003.

 

 
| /s/Notary              |   |
|------------------------|--------|
| Name:                  |
| Title: Notary Public   |
| My commission expires: |

 

----
§ 800.302 Review of applications. ( a ) *Determinations.* OPM will determine if an applicant meets the requirements of this part. If OPM determines that an applicant meets the requirements of this part, OPM may accept the applicant to enter into contract negotiations with OPM to participate in the MSP Program.
( b ) *Requests for additional information.* OPM may request additional information from an applicant before making a decision about whether to enter into contract negotiations with that applicant to participate in the MSP Program.
( c ) *Declination of application.* If, after reviewing an application to participate in the MSP Program, OPM declines to enter into contract negotiations with the applicant, OPM will inform the applicant in writing of the reasons for that decision.
( d ) *Discretion.* The decision whether to enter into contract negotiations with a health insurance issuer who has applied to participate in the MSP Program is committed to OPM's discretion.
( e ) *Impact on future applications.* OPM's declination of an application to participate in the MSP Program will not preclude the applicant from submitting an application for a subsequent year to participate in the MSP Program.
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 151.03-37 Maximum allowable working pressure.

The maximum allowable working pressure shall be as defined in section VIII of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.

[CGFR 70-10, 35 FR 3714, Feb. 25, 1970, as amended by CGD 85-061, 54 FR 50965, Dec. 11, 1989]
# C_2013189EN.01002001.xml

| 29.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2013 — Restoin v OHIM (EQUIPMENT)

(Case T-356/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark EQUIPMENT - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)

2013/C 189/39

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Restoin (Paris, France) (represented by: A. Alcaraz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Chamber of the Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 April 2011 (Case R 1430/2010-4), concerning an application for registration of the word mark EQUIPMENT as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Restoin to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Restoin to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 269, 1.9.2011.

1

---
Exhibit 10.37

Mr. Charles
Bracken

3
May 2002

Re:
Bonus Payments

Dear
Charlie,

Pursuant
to our prior agreement, on termination of your employment for any reason other than gross misconduct, the Company agreed to pay in a cash bonus, any shortfall between
US$1,000,000 and your cumulative realized pre-tax gain on exercise and sale of all vested options ("Shortfall Bonus") during your employment and within the option exercise period after
termination. The Company desires to incent you to remain in the employment of the Company and you desire to receive a portion of the Shortfall Bonus prior to the end of your employment. Therefore, the
Company will agree to pay you a pro rata portion of the Shortfall Bonus ("Partial Bonus") prior to the termination of your employment, provided that you agree to the following:



If
you are in agreement with the above, please indicate by signing below and returning the enclosed copy of this letter and the payment will be processed through the payroll.

Yours
sincerely,

Ton
Tuijten
Senior Vice President & General Counsel

| | AGREED AND ACCEPTED                  
| | -------------------------------------
| | /s/CHARLES BRACKENMr. Charles Bracken

May
3, 2002

1

---

QuickLinks
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.151-43 Conditions at servicing facilities. ( a ) Each facility must maintain a room to service inflatable liferafts that— ( 1 ) Is clean;
( 2 ) Is fully enclosed;
( 3 ) Has enough space to service the number of liferafts likely to be present for service at one time;
( 4 ) Has a ceiling high enough to hold and allow overturning of a fully inflated liferaft of the largest size to be serviced, or is furnished with an equally efficient means to facilitate the inspection of bottom seams;
( 5 ) Has a smooth floor that will not damage a liferaft, can be easily cleaned, and is kept clean and free from oil, grease, and abrasive material;
( 6 ) Is well lit but free from direct sunlight;
( 7 ) Is arranged to maintain an even temperature and low humidity in each area where liferafts are pressure tested, including by mechanical air-conditioning equipment in climates where it is necessary;
( 8 ) Is arranged so that stored liferafts are not subjected to excessive loads and, if stacked one directly on top of another, does not have them stacked more than two liferafts high;
( 9 ) Is efficiently ventilated but free of drafts; and
( 10 ) Is a designated no-smoking area.
( b ) In addition to the room required by paragraph (a) of this section, each facility must maintain areas or rooms for storage of liferafts awaiting servicing, repair, or delivery; for repair and painting of reinforced plastic containers; for storage of pyrotechnics and other materials, such as spare parts and required equipment; and for administrative purposes.