alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2228 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to allow 

States to count certain students formerly identified as limited English 

proficient as being within the limited English proficient subgroup, and 

certain students formerly identified as students with disabilities as being 

within the students with disabilities subgroup. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 4, 2009 

Mr. BOOZMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to allow States to count certain students formerly identified as limited English proficient as being 

within the limited English proficient subgroup, and certain students formerly identified as students with disabilities as being within the students with disabilities subgroup. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2228 IH

1 SECTION 1. ALLOWING STATES TO COUNT CERTAIN STU2 DENTS FORMERLY IDENTIFIED AS LIMITED 

3 ENGLISH PROFICIENT OR AS STUDENTS 

4 WITH DISABILITIES AS CONTINUING TO BE 

5 MEMBERS OF THAT SUBGROUP. 

6 Section 1111(b)(2)(C)(v)(II) of the Elementary and 

7 Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

8 6311(b)(2)(C)(v)(II)) is amended— 

9 (1) in item (cc) by inserting before the semi10 colon the following: ‘‘, which may, at the discretion 

11 of the State, include students who no longer are 

12 identified as students with disabilities but who were, 

13 in any of the preceding three school years, identified 

14 as students with disabilities’’; and 

15 (2) in item (dd) by inserting before the semi16 colon the following: ‘‘, which may, at the discretion 

17 of the State, include students who no longer are 

18 identified as students with limited English pro19 ficiency but who were, in any of the preceding three 

20 school years, identified as students with limited 

21 English proficiency’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         710,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,000,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  7,730,413
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     16,362,933
<ALLOWANCE>                                    244,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,196,970
<DEPOSITS>                                  20,246,390
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,031,524
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             86,976
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,871,211
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,036,023)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              31,196,970
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 96,720
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               67,864
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                56,720
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               221,304
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              69,556
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              72,791
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          148,513
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  244,400
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                509,527
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (597,471)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   (597,471)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (597,471)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.52)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            (244,400)
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      (244,400)
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
In the Interest of D.R. and J.B., ) children. ) ________________________________ ) ) L.D., ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-2256 ) DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND ) FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM ) PROGRAM, ) ) Respondents. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed August 2, 2019. Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Pasco County; James R. Stearns, Judge. Ita M. Neymotin, Regional Counsel and Africa F. Altidor, Assistant Regional Counsel, New Port Richey, for Petitioner. Bernie McCabe, State Attorney, and Leslie M. Layne, Assistant State Attorney, Clearwater, for Respondent Department of Children and Families. Thomasina F. Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals and Joanna- 2 -

Summers Brunell, Senior Attorney, Tallahassee, for Respondent Guardian ad Litem Program. PER CURIAM.

Denied.

KELLY, LaROSE, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
§ 179.210 Collision bulkhead. ( a ) A vessel of more than 19.8 meters (65 feet) in length must have a collision bulkhead.
( b ) A vessel of not more than 19.8 meters (65 feet) in length must have a collision bulkhead if it: ( 1 ) Carries more than 49 passengers;
( 2 ) Operates on exposed waters;
( 3 ) Is of more than 12.2 meters (40 feet) in length and operates on partially protected waters; or
( 4 ) Is constructed of wood on or after March 11, 2001, and operates in cold water.
( c ) A double-ended ferry required to have a collision bulkhead must have a collision bulkhead at each end of the vessel.
H. R. 2131 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine 

An Act 

To amend the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 to reauthorize 

the United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF UNITED STATES ADVISORY 

COMMISSION ON PUBLIC DIPLOMACY. 

Section 1334 of the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring 

Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 6553) is amended by striking ‘‘October 

1, 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘October 1, 2010’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,035,392
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         117,298,459
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,347,070
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     50,582,199
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                     0
<LOANS>                                         95,459,167
<ALLOWANCE>                                        827,148
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 154,504,877
<DEPOSITS>                                     127,892,728
<SHORT-TERM>                                             0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                792,640
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           215,284
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,104,225
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 154,504,877
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,747,258
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  773,350
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    60,426
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,581,034
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,136,848
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,150,395
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,430,639
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       45,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                       0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,182,697
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    362,132
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         362,132
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    362,132
<CHANGES>                                          362,132
<NET-INCOME>                                       223,225
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.11
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        3.86
<LOANS-NON>                                            505
<LOANS-PAST>                                             0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   791,897
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       12,877
<RECOVERIES>                                         3,128
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  827,148
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               827,148
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                  0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1


<PAGE>


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


I,  Michael  J.  Smith,  Chief  Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Cybernet Internet Services International, Inc. (the "Company"), certify pursuant
to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

   (1)  the  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q  of the Company for the quarterly
        period  ended  March 31, 2003  (the  "Report")  fully  complies with the
        requirements of Section 13(a) of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934
        (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));  and

   (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of  the
        Company.


Dated:  July  29,  2003


                               /s/  Michael  J.  Smith
                               ----------------------------------
                               Michael  J.  Smith
                               Chief  Executive  Officer  and
                               Chief  Financial  Officer

           ----------------------------------------------------------

A  signed  original  of  this  written  statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  has  been  provided to Cybernet Internet Services
International,  Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by  Cybernet  Internet  Services
International,  Inc.  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its  staff  upon  request.
Exhibit 32.1   Certification  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Optimized Transportation Management, Inc.  (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  DATE: August 23, 2010  BY:/s/ Kevin P. Brennan Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  This certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for any other purpose. It is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Optimized Transportation Management, Inc.  and will be retained by Optimized Transportation Management, Inc.  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 10.17


Summary of Guaranty  Agreement by and between Shenzhen  Branch,  Industrial Bank
and Shenzhen High-Tech Investment Service Co. ("Shenzhen High-Tech") dated as of
March 10, 2004.

         Shenzhen  High-Tech  signed a guaranty on March 10, 2004 in relation to
the Loan  Agreement as summarized in Exhibit  10.16.  According to the guaranty,
the  guarantor  undertakes  to assume the liability of Shenzhen BAK Battery Co.,
Ltd., subject to the maximum security amount of RMB 20,000,000 Yuan.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

TRAVIUS M. CATO , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3411

[ February 14, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Laura Johnson , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2016

- CF

- 010119

- AXXX

- WB

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Brad R. Schlesinger, Assistant Publ ic Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley B

. Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allan R. Geesey, Assistant Atto rney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

W ARNER , D AMOORGIAN and L EVINE , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
##### 



Exhibit 23 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Matria Healthcare, Inc.: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-100977,
333-90822, 333-72516, 333-72512, 333-69347, 333-42856, 333-02283,
333-117875 and 333-01539) on Form S-8 and (Nos. 333-109488
and 333-116200) on Form S-3 of Matria Healthcare, Inc. of our reports dated March 14,
2005, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Matria Healthcare, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders
equity and comprehensive earnings (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2004, and the related financial statement schedule, managements
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004,
which reports appear in the 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Matria Healthcare, Inc. (KPMG LLP)
 Atlanta, Georgia
March 14, 2005
CROSSROADS LIQUIDATING TRUST 8-K


 


Exhibit 10.1


 





FIRST
AMENDMENT TO LIQUIDATING TRUST AGREEMENT


 


THIS
FIRST AMENDMENT TO LIQUIDATING TRUST AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is dated as of June 23, 2020 (the “Effective
Date”), by Crossroads Liquidating Trust, a Maryland statutory trust (the “Trust”) and Andrew Dakos, Phillip
Goldstein and Gerald Hellerman (collectively, the “Trustees”).


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS,
on June 23, 2017 (the “Effective Date”), Crossroads Capital, Inc. and the Trustees, entered into that certain Liquidating
Trust Agreement (the “Agreement”) of the Trust;


 


WHEREAS,
pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Agreement, the Trustees have the right to continue the existence of the Trust beyond the three-year
term if the Trustees reasonably determine that an extension is necessary to fulfil the purposes of the Trust;


 


WHEREAS,
the Trustees have reasonably determined that an extension is necessary to fulfil the purposes of the Trust; and


 


WHEREAS,
the Trustees desire to extend the duration of the Trust to expire on or before December 31, 2020.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the Trustees hereby amend the Agreement as follows:


 


		1.	Section
                                         4.1 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:



 


4.1





 


Duration.
The existence of the Trust shall terminate upon the earliest of (a) the liquidation and distribution of the net proceeds
of all of the Trust Assets as provided in Section 5.7, or (b) December 31, 2020. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
the Trustees may continue the existence of the Trust beyond December 31, 2020 if the Trustees reasonably determine that an extension
is necessary to fulfill the purposes of the Trust.


 


		2.	Miscellaneous.



 


(a)   
The Agreement, as hereby modified, shall continue in full force and effect, subject to the terms and conditions thereof. Any
defined terms not otherwise defined herein shall have those meanings as defined in the Agreement.


 


(b)    This
Amendment shall be construed in accordance with the Laws of the State of Maryland.


 


(c)   
Any signatures of this Amendment transmitted by facsimile or other electronic means shall be deemed original signatures.


 


(d)   
If any term or provision hereof is held invalid or unenforceable, to any extent, then the remaining terms and provisions hereof
shall not be affected thereby, but each term and provision shall be valid and be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law.


 


 


[Signature
page follows.]


 




    	 	 	 



    	 



    

 


       IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Trustees have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.





	 	CROSSROADS LIQUIDATING TRUST
	 	 
	 	 
	 	/s/ Ben H. Harris	 
	 	By:
Ben H. Harris, Administrator
	 	 
	 	 
	 	TRUSTEES:
	 	 
	 	 
	 	/s/ Andrew Dakos	 
	 	Andrew Dakos
	 	 
	 	/s/ Phillip Goldstein	 
	 	Phillip
Goldstein
	 	 
	 	/s/ Gerald Hellerman	 
	 	Gerald
Hellerman
# C_2011113EN.01001902.xml

| 9.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/19

---

Action brought on 16 February 2011 — Shang v OHIM (Justing)

(Case T-103/11)

2011/C 113/38

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tiantian Shang (Rome, Italy) (represented by A. Salerni, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the contested provision. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested provision.

| — | Alter the decision taken by OHIM and recognise the right of seniority enjoyed by national mark RM 2006C002075 in relation to Community trade mark 008391202, including the name and symbol, with all the effects thus entailed as provided for in Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trade mark, as replaced by Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Alter the decision taken by OHIM and recognise the right of seniority enjoyed by national mark RM 2006C002075 in relation to Community trade mark 008391202, including the name and symbol, with all the effects thus entailed as provided for in Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trade mark, as replaced by Regulation No 207/2009.

| — | In the alternative, given that both the national and the Community mark share at the very least a common name element, consisting in the word ‘Justing’, recognise that the name element of the mark, or the name ‘Justing’, has a right of seniority, extending to it the retroactive effects of Community registration, with the possible exclusion solely of the graphic illustration surrounding the name. |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative, given that both the national and the Community mark share at the very least a common name element, consisting in the word ‘Justing’, recognise that the name element of the mark, or the name ‘Justing’, has a right of seniority, extending to it the retroactive effects of Community registration, with the possible exclusion solely of the graphic illustration surrounding the name.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the word element ‘Justing’ (registration application No 8 391 203) for goods and services in Classes 18 and 25, in respect of which it is claimed that the national figurative mark (Italian registration No 1 217 203), which also contains the word element ‘Justing’, has a right of seniority

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejected the application claiming seniority of the national figurative mark on the ground that the Italian mark and the Community mark are not the same.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Misapplication of Article 34 of Regulation No 207/2009 and infringement of Directive 98/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 on the legal protection of designs.

Pleas in law:

---