alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008227EN.01001801.xml

| 4.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/18

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 227/07)

| Reference number of the aid | XT 73/08 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Spain |
| Region | La Rioja |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Programa Estratégico de Comercio Exterior |
| Legal basis | Orden 16/2008, de 3 de junio de 2008, de la Consejería de Industria, Innovación y Empleo, por la que se aprueban las bases reguladoras de la concesión de subvenciones por la Agencia de Desarrollo Económico de La Rioja destinadas al programa estratégico de comercio exterior, en régimen de concurrencia competitiva (B.O.R. no 75/2008, de 7 de junio) |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Budget | Annual budget: EUR 0,15 million |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Article 4(2)-(7) of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 7.6.2008 |
| Duration | 31.12.2013 |
| Objective | Specific training |
| Economic sectors | All sectors eligible for training aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Agencia de Desarrollo Económico de La Rioja |
| Muro de la Mata, 13-14 |
| E-26071 Logroño |

Reference number of the aid

XT 73/08

Member State

Spain

Region

La Rioja

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Programa Estratégico de Comercio Exterior

Legal basis

Orden 16/2008, de 3 de junio de 2008, de la Consejería de Industria, Innovación y Empleo, por la que se aprueban las bases reguladoras de la concesión de subvenciones por la Agencia de Desarrollo Económico de La Rioja destinadas al programa estratégico de comercio exterior, en régimen de concurrencia competitiva (B.O.R. no 75/2008, de 7 de junio)

o

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Budget

Annual budget: EUR 0,15 million

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Article 4(2)-(7) of the Regulation

Date of implementation

7.6.2008

Duration

31.12.2013

Objective

Specific training

Economic sectors

All sectors eligible for training aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Agencia de Desarrollo Económico de La Rioja

Muro de la Mata, 13-14

E-26071 Logroño

Dirección Internet publicación régimen de ayuda:

http://www.larioja.org/npRioja/default/defaultpage.jsp?idtab=449883

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 151.03-49 Sounding tube.

This is an unperforated tube fitted to an ullage hole, secured so as to be vapor tight to the underside of the tank top open at the bottom, and extending to within 18 inches or less of the bottom of the tank.
A-9(B) Model Opt-Out Form for Periodic Statements
 

You have the right to tell us not to pay overdrafts for ATM withdrawals and debit card 

purchases you make at a store, online, or by telephone. [If you do, we will decline these 

transactions if you do not have enough money in your account to cover them.] As a result, you 

may pay fewer overdraft fees. 

To opt out of our overdraft coverage, or for information about alternatives we offer for covering 

overdrafts (including linking this account to another account with us), contact us at 1-8xx-xxxxxxx or [insert Internet address].
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: September 18, 2014 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR

–2013
- 0602 FROM: Ray

Saracino , EPA Region 9 SUBJECT: September 12, 2014 M eeting with CA Legislature staff Regarding Proposed

Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants
**SUMMARY** A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on September 12, 2014 to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants
. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants wa s proposed on June 2 , 2014 and published in the Federal Register on June 18, 2014. **ATTENDEES** External Stakeholders Kip Lipper, Consultant to President Pro Tempore Don Perata Four others legislative aides/advisors EPA Deborah Jordan, R9 **Attachment** File: CA Legislature 111(d)_ 091214_Jordan
§ 703.2 Functions. Under the Commission's charter each Advisory Committee shall: ( a ) Advise the Commission in writing of any knowledge or information it has of any alleged deprivation of the right to vote and to have the vote counted by reason of color, race, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or that citizens are being accorded or denied the right to vote in Federal elections as a result of patterns or practices of fraud or discrimination;
( b ) Advise the Commission concerning matters related to discrimination or a denial of equal protection of the laws under the Constitution and the effect of the laws and policies of the Federal Government with respect to equal protection of the laws;
( c ) Advise the Commission upon matters of mutual concern in the preparation of reports of the Commission to the President and the Congress;
( d ) Receive reports, suggestions, and recommendations from individuals, public and private organizations, and public officials upon matters pertinent to inquiries conducted by the Advisory Committee;
( e ) Initiate and forward advice and recommendations to the Commission upon matters that the Advisory Committee has studied;
( f ) Assist the Commission in the exercise of its clearinghouse function and with respect to other matters that the Advisory Committee has studied;
( g ) Attend, as observers, any open hearing or conference that the Commission may hold within the State.
§ 185.202 Notice of casualty. ( a ) Immediately after the addressing of resultant safety concerns, the owner, agent, master, or person in charge of a vessel involved in a marine casualty shall notify the nearest Sector Office, Marine Inspection Office, or Coast Guard Group Office whenever a vessel is involved in a marine casualty consisting of: ( 1 ) An unintended grounding, or an unintended strike of (allision with) a bridge;
( 2 ) An intended grounding, or an intended strike of a bridge, that creates a hazard to navigation, the environment, or the safety of a vessel, or that meets any criterion of paragraphs (a)(3) through (a)(7) of this section;
( 3 ) Loss of main propulsion or primary steering, or any associated component or control system, that reduces the maneuverability of the vessel;
( 4 ) An occurrence materially and adversely affecting the vessel's seaworthiness or fitness for service or route, including but not limited to fire, flooding, failure of or damage to fixed fire extinguishing systems, lifesaving equipment, auxiliary power generating equipment, or bilge pumping systems;
( 5 ) Loss of life;
( 6 ) Injury that requires professional medical treatment (treatment beyond first aid) and, if the person is engaged or employed on board a vessel in commercial service, which renders the individual unfit to perform his or her routine duties; or
( 7 ) An occurrence not meeting any of the above criteria but causing property damage in excess of $25,000. This damage includes the cost of labor and material to restore the property to its condition before the occurrence, but does not include the cost of salvage, cleaning, gas freeing, drydocking, or demurrage.
( b ) A vessel is excluded from the requirements of paragraphs (a)(5) and (a)(6) of this section with respect to the death or injury of shipyard or harbor workers when such accidents are not the result of either a vessel casualty (e.g., collision) or a vessel equipment casualty (e.g., cargo boom failure) and are subject to the reporting requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 1904.
( c ) Notice given as required by § 185.203 satisfies the requirement of this section if the marine casualty involves a hazardous condition.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 1005, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36331, July 2, 2007]
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

Editorial Note on Subpart 151.50 of Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart 151.50 of part 151 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, and CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996.

§ 151.50-13 Propylene oxide. ( a ) ( 1 ) Pressure vessel cargo tanks shall meet the requirements of Class II pressure vessels.
( 2 ) Cargo tanks shall be designed for the maximum pressure expected to be encountered during loading, storing and discharging the cargo but in no case shall the design pressure of pressure vessel tanks be less than thirty (30) pounds per square inch gauge. The tank shell and heads shall not be less than 5 ⁄ 16-inch thick.
( b ) When propylene oxide is carried on board a vessel, piping systems in propylene oxide service shall not be used for any other product and shall be completely separate from all other systems. The piping system shall be designed so that no cross connection may be made through inadvertence.
( c ) Each safety relief valve shall be set to start to discharge at not less than 30 pounds per square inch gauge, nor more than the design pressure of the tank.
( d ) Filling density shall not exceed 80 percent.
( e ) ( 1 ) The cargo shall be shipped under a suitable protective padding, such as nitrogen gas. Other gases proposed for use as padding may be given consideration by the Commandant. Original charging only of protective gas padding at the loading facility is not considered adequate. A sufficient amount of spare padding gas as approved by the Commandant shall be provided on the vessel in order to maintain the proper concentration of the gas in the event of normal leakage or other losses.
( 2 ) Any padding gas selected should be at least 98 percent pure and free of reactive materials.
( f ) Prior to loading, a sample from the cargo tank will be taken to insure that the pad gas will meet the requirements of paragraph (e) of this section and that the oxygen content of the vapor space will be not more than 2 percent maximum. If necessary, a sample will be taken after loading to insure the vapor space meets this requirement.
( g ) The cargo piping shall be subjected to a hydrostatic test of 11 ⁄ 2 times the maximum pressure to which they may be subjected in service.
( h ) The Commandant may permit the transportation of propylene oxide in other than pressure vessel type tanks if it is shown to his satisfaction that a degree of safety is obtained consistent with the minimum requirements of this subpart.
( i ) The provisions of § 151.50-10 shall be complied with as a requirement for shipping propylene oxide.
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.1325 Liquid level alarm system: All cargo tanks. Except as allowed under § 154.1330, each cargo tank must have a high liquid level alarm system that: ( a ) Is independent of the liquid level gauging system under § 154.1305;
( b ) Actuates quick-closing valves under §§ 154.530, 154.532, and 154,538 or a stop valve in the cargo tank loading line to prevent the tank from becoming 100 percent liquid full and without causing the pressure in the loading lines to exceed the design pressure; and
( c ) Actuates an audible and visual alarm at the cargo control station at the liquid level at which the valves under paragraph (b) of this section are actuated or at some lower liquid level.
Order filed February 28, 2017

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00478

- CR NO. 14

- 16

- 00479

- CR

____________ MIGUEL ANGEL SAENZ , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 405th District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 14CR3080 & 14CR3117



### ORDER
Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant has made known to this Court his desire to review the reco rd and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).
Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 405th District Court to afford appellant an opportunity to view the trial rec ord in accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before March 14, 2017 ; that theclerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant

is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that date.

PER CURIAM
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 28, 2010 

Order 

 

April 28, 2010 

140625 & (40) 

ST. JOSEPH MERCY OAKLAND a/k/a 

TRINITY HEALTH-MICHIGAN, 

 Plaintiff Counter 

 Defendant-Appellant, 

 SC: 140625 

V CoA: 286946 

 Oakland CC: 04-059636-CK 

DETROIT OSTEOOPATHIC HOSPITAL 

CORPORATION, d/b/a BI-COUNTY 

COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, a/k/a HENRY 

FORD HEALTH SYSTEMS and ANDREA 

ABESSINIO, 

 Defendant Counter 

 Plaintiffs-Appellees. 

_________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by the attorneys for the 

parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered and, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with 

prejudice and without costs.
§ 174.220 Hatches and coamings. ( a ) Each hatch exposed to the weather must be watertight, except that the following hatches may be only weathertight: ( 1 ) Each hatch on a watertight trunk that extends at least 430 millimeters (17 inches) above the weather deck.
( 2 ) Each hatch in a cabin top.
( b ) Each hatch cover must— ( 1 ) Have securing-devices; and
( 2 ) Be attached to the hatch frame or coaming by hinges, captive chains, or other devices to prevent its loss.
( c ) Each hatch that provides access to quarters or to accommodation spaces for crew members or offshore workers must be capable of being opened and closed from either side.
( d ) Except as provided by paragraph (e) of this section, a weathertight door with a permanent watertight coaming at least 380 millimeters (15 inches) high must be installed for each opening in a deckhouse or companionway that— ( 1 ) Gives access into the hull; and
( 2 ) Is in an exposed place.
( e ) If an opening in a deckhouse or companionway has a Class-1 watertight door installed, the height of the watertight coaming need only accommodate the door.
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 2
Federal Reserve Bank of: New York

## Filings received during the week ending March 25, 2006

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 119.422 Integral and non-integral keel cooler installations. ( a ) A keel cooler installation used for engine cooling must be designed to prevent flooding.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (e), a shutoff valve must be located where the cooler piping penetrates the shell, as near the shell as practicable, except where the penetration is forward of the collision bulkhead.
( c ) The thickness of the inlet and discharge connections, outboard of the shutoff values required by paragraph (b) of this section, must be at least Schedule 80.
( d ) Short lengths of approved nonmetallic flexible hose, fixed by two hose clamps at each end of the hose, may be used at machinery connections for a keel cooler installation.
( e ) Shutoff valves are not required for integral keel coolers. A keel cooler is considered integral to the hull if the following conditions are satisfied: ( 1 ) The cooler structure is fabricated from material of the same thickness and quality as the hull;
( 2 ) The flexible connections are located well above the deepest subdivision draft;
( 3 ) The end of the structure is faired to the hull with a slope no greater than 4 to 1; and
( 4 ) Full penetration welds are employed in the fabrication of the structure and its attachment to the hull.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 922, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by USCG-2000-7790, 65 FR 58462, Sept. 29, 2000]
# C_2011089EN.01002201.xml

| 19.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/22

---

Action brought on 24 January 2011 — Fraas v OHIM (Dark grey, light grey, black, beige, dark red and light red coloured checked pattern)

(Case T-50/11)

2011/C 89/44

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: V. Fraas GmbH (Helmbrechts-Wüstenselbitz, Germany) (represented by G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 November 2010 in Case R 1316/2010-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 November 2010 in Case R 1316/2010-4;

| — | Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark representing a dark grey, light grey, black, beige, dark red and light red coloured checked pattern for goods in Classes 18, 24, and 25

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Rejection of the application

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1), as the Community trade mark at issue has distinctive character, and infringement of Articles 75 and 76 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal did not examine the extensive factual and legal submissions of the applicant.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
----

Map shows volcanic or slump features and drowned reef platforms, pinnacle reefs, and moats on down current side of reefs.  Compare to shaded-relief map in Plate 3 and backscatter maps in Figures 12 and 13, and Plate 4.  Note that large bedforms are visible in Plate 3 but do not appear in Figure 11 owing to map scale.  Sun illumination: azimuth 345 degrees; angle 45 degrees.

*go to larger versionof Figure 11 (2.4MB)**go to metadata for this field activity, A-1-98-HW*

----

----

----

SusanA. Cochran

U.S. Department of the Interior,U.S.Geological Survey,Western RegionCoastal and Marine Geology
#### FRANCES S. DILATUSH ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. JACOB PROWN ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Submitted May term, 1929

Decided October 21, 1929.

Before Gummere, Chief Justice, and Justices Kalisch and Campbell.

Eor the rule, *C. Gasewell Heine.*

Contra, *Harold McDermott*and *Theodore D. Parsons.*

Per Curiam.

The only reason urged for setting aside the verdicts of the plaintiffs Anna H. Dilatush and E. Louise Dilatush is that they are excessive. We do not find them to be so. Both received painful injuries, some of which are permanent.

The rule is discharged.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 15, 2018

No. 04-18-00089-CR

Brandon Edward COLEMAN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR7012

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellate counsel’s motions to withdraw are GRANTED. Since appellant is indigent, 

new appellate counsel must be appointed. It is therefore ORDERED that these appeals are 

ABATED to the trial court. See Duncan v. State, 653 S.W.2d 38, 40 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983) 

(holding that appellate courts may abate appeals so that trial court can assure appellant has 

effective assistance of counsel). The trial court is ORDERED to appoint new appellate counsel 

and to cause the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record in each of these appeals no 

later than July 2, 2018, containing documentation of such appointment. After the supplemental 

clerk’s records are filed, the appeals will be reinstated on the docket of this court, and a new 

deadline will be set for the filing of appellant’s brief. Appellant’s motion for extension of time 

to file appellant’s brief is MOOT.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of June, 2018.
___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court