alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George G. Andrews, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 14, 2005



/s/ George G. AndrewsGeorge G. Andrews, President and Director(Principal Executive Officer)




18
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Excite,
Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          45,366
<SECURITIES>                                    16,239
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,014
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,422)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               148,518
<PP&E>                                          57,452
<DEPRECIATION>                                (21,515)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 220,673
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,038
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        813
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                     142,534
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   220,673
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,360
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               160,062
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,772
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,862
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (37,559)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (37,559)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (37,559)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.79)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.79)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>
For purposes of this exhibit, primary means basic. In June 1998, the Board of
Directors declared a two-for-one stock split which was in the form of a 100%
stock dividend. In accordance with Regulation S-K Item 601, prior period
financial data schedules have not been restated for the stock split.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,668 
<SECURITIES>                                         0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,742  
<ALLOWANCES>                                       839  
<INVENTORY>                                     57,022  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               128,061  
<PP&E>                                         125,483  
<DEPRECIATION>                                  59,698  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 222,701  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,802  
<BONDS>                                        100,000  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0  
<PREFERRED>                                        521  
<COMMON>                                             3  
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,153  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   222,701  
<SALES>                                        211,598  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               211,598  
<CGS>                                          157,299  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,011  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    88  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,276  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,868)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,455)  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,413)  
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0  
<CHANGES>                                            0  
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,413)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0  
                                              


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.115-19 Operating instructions and information for the ship's training manual. ( a ) Each winch must have instructions and information for the ship's training manual that use the symbols from IMO Res. A.760(18) (incorporated by reference, see § 160.115-5 of this subpart) to describe the location and operation of the winch.
( b ) The instructions and information required by paragraph (a) of this section may be combined with similar material for survival craft and rescue boats, and their complete launching systems.
( c ) The winch manufacturer must make operating instructions and information required by paragraph (a) of this section available in English to the purchaser of a winch approved by the Coast Guard.
§ 175.115 Applicability to offshore supply vessels. ( a ) Existing OSVs of more than 15 but less than 100 gross tons are subject to inspection under this subchapter. New OSVs of more than 15 but less than 100 gross tons are subject to inspection under subchapter L of this chapter.
( b ) Each existing OSV permitted grandfathering under paragraph (a) of this section must complete construction and have a Certificate of Inspection by March 16, 1998.
[CGD 82-004, CGD 86-074, 62 FR 49355, Sept. 19, 1997]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cr-20780 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

CURTIS SCOTT, 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT’S APPEARANCE 

On March 14, 2019, the Court scheduled an in-person status conference in this 

action for April 1, 2019, at 11:00 a.m. (See Notice, ECF #482.) Defendant Curtis 

Scott is ordered to personally appear at that conference. (See id.) Through this order, 

the United States Marshals Service is authorized to use the minimum amount of 

force necessary to ensure Scott’s appearance in Court for the scheduled status 

conference. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: March 27, 2019 
 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on March 27, 2019, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (810) 341-9764
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

PARRISH REDD,

Plaintiff, No. 14-14340

v. District Judge Marianne O. Battani

Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

TERRANCE VAILS, ET AL.,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER 

Plaintiff Parrish Redd, having filed a pro se civil complaint, now moves for

appointment of pro bono counsel [Doc. #76].

Unlike criminal cases, there is no constitutional or statutory right to the

appointment of counsel in civil cases. Rather, the Court requests members of the bar to

assist in appropriate cases. In Lavado v. Keohane, 992 F.2d 601, 605-606 (6 Cir. 1993), th

the Sixth Circuit noted that “[a]ppointment of counsel in a civil case is not a

constitutional right. It is a privilege that is justified only by exceptional circumstances.”

(Internal quotations and citations omitted).

It is the practice of this Court to defer any attempt to obtain counsel for pro se civil

Plaintiffs until after motions to dismiss or motions for summary judgment have been

denied. Under this Court’s scheduling order, motions to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c)

-1-

2:14-cv-14340-MOB-RSW Doc # 77 Filed 05/19/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 462
are not due until June 20, 2016, and motions for summary judgment are not due until

January 6, 2017. At this point, Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel is premature. If

Plaintiff’s claims ultimately survive dispositive motions, he may renew his motion for

appointment of counsel at that time.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel [Docket #76]

is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

s/R. Steven Whalen 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Date: May 19, 2016

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on

May 19, 2016, electronically and/or by U.S. mail.

s/Carolyn M. Ciesla 

Case Manager to the 

Honorable R. Steven Whalen

-2-

2:14-cv-14340-MOB-RSW Doc # 77 Filed 05/19/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 463
§ 167.30-5 Proceeding to another port for repairs. ( a ) The Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, may issue a permit to proceed to another port for repairs, if in his judgment it can be done with safety. In the issuance of such a permit the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, will state upon its face, the conditions upon which it is granted.
( b ) When a nautical school ship obtains a permit from the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, to go to another port for repairs, the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, shall so notify the Coast Guard District Commander, and state the repairs to be made. The Coast Guard District Commander shall notify the Coast Guard District Commander of the district where such repairs are to be made, furnishing him a copy of the report indicating the repairs ordered.
(logo)PRUDENTIAL HOME MORTGAGE      The Prudential Home Mortgage Company, Inc.
                                    7485 New Horizon Way
                                    Frederick, MD 21701
                                    301 696-7900


December 31, 1995


As of and for the year ended  December 31, 1995,  The  Prudential  Home Mortgage
Company,  Inc. had complied in all material  respects with the minimum servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association  of America's  Uniform
Single  Attestation  Program for  Mortgage  Bankers with respect to its mortgage
servicing  operations.  As of and for  the  same  period,  The  Prudential  Home
Mortgage  Company,  Inc. had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and  omissions
policy in the amount of $178 million.



                            /s/Marvin I. Moskowitz
                            Marvin Moskowitz
                            Chief Executive Officer and Director

                            /s/Jerry Halbrook
                            Jerry Halbrook
                            Executive Vice President, Senior Financial Officer &
                            Controller

                            /s/Brian Bartlett
                            Brian Bartlett
                            Vice President








                     An Affiliate of The Prudential Insurance Company of America
                     doing business as P.H. Mortgage Company, Inc. in Ohio
Proclamation 8126 of April 17, 2007

# Honoring the Victims of the Tragedy at Virginia Tech

Our Nation grieves with those who have lost loved ones at Virginia Tech. We hold the victims in our hearts. We lift them up in our prayers, and we ask a loving God to comfort those who are suffering.

As a mark of respect for the victims of the senseless acts of violence perpetrated on Monday, April 16, 2007, by the authority vested in me as President of the United States by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby order that the flag of the United States shall be flown at half-staff at the White House and upon all public buildings and grounds, at all military posts and naval stations, and on all naval vessels of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia and throughout the United States and its Territories and possessions until sunset, Sunday, April 22, 2007. I also direct that the flag shall be flown at half-staff for the same length of time at all United States embassies, legations, consular offices, and other facilities abroad, including all military facilities and naval vessels and stations.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this seventeenth day of April, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first.



[FR Doc. 07-1984 Billing code 3195-01-P
Argued and submitted September 18, 1995,

reversed and remanded February 7, 1996

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Duane B. Meeker, Claimant. Duane B. MEEKER, *Petitioner, v.*CORNELL MFG. and Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation, *Respondents.*

(93-01214; CA A86082)

910 P2d 1175

Susan Frank argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief were Gregory A. Bunnell and Pozzi Wilson & Atchison.

Alexander D. Libmann argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded. *Carroll v. Boise Cascade Corp.,*138 Or App 610, 910 P2d 1111 (1996).
CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------


     To my knowledge, this Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
2003,  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the  information  contained in this Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of Peoples Bankcorp, Inc.



                                   By: /s/ Robert E. Wilson
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Robert E. Wilson
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
                                       (Duly Authorized and Principal Executive,
                                       Accounting and Financial Officer)

Date: May __, 2003
#### Smith v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

When it is shown that more than a year has elapsed since an appeal was taken, and neither the original papers, nor copies of the same, have been filed in this court, and it is further shown that no abstract or brief was served or filed for nearly a year after the appeal was taken, and no sufficient explanation or excuse is offered for the delay, this court will dismiss the appeal.

(Syllabus by the Court.

Opinion filed April 13, 1893.)

Appeal from circuit court, Moody county. Hon. P. R. Aikens, Judge.

*Lynn & Sullivan, Palmer & Bogde,*and *F. E. Gill,*for appellants.

*Winsor & Kittredge,*and *H. H. Field,*for respondents.

Corson, J.

A motion was made in this court by the defendant and respondent for an order dismissing the appeal. Prom the affidavits served and filed, and the records of this court, it appears that the judgment from which the appeal was taken was rendered on June 16, 1891, and that the notice of appeal and undertaking on appeal were served upon the attorneys for respondent on March 31, 1892. It further appears that neither the original papers, nor copies thereof, have ever been filed in this court, and that neither an abstract nor brief was served on the respondent’s attorneys, or filed in this court, prior to March 11, 1893. We think that, upon the facts shown by the respondent, the motion should be granted. The rules of this court contemplate that a party appealing must proceed with diligence in bringing his case to a hearing in this court. When the appeal is perfected more than 30 days before the commencement of a term of this court, the appellant is required to see that the original papers, or copies, are filed in this court at least 15 days prior to the commencement of the term, and to serve and file an abstract and brief at least 20 days before the commencement of the term. In this case, although *31the appeal was taken on March 31, 1892, — more than one year ago, — neither the original papers, nor copies, have yet been filed in this court; and although the October, 1892, term of this court was held several months after the appeal was taken, yet no abstract or brief was served until March 14th of the present year, when they were promptly returned as not served in time. Notice of the motion seems to have been duly served upon the attorneys for the appellant, but no explanation or excuse is offered for the delay shown. The respondent is therefore entitled to have the appeal dismissed, but without prejudice. Bank v. Crouch, (S. D.) 53 N. W. Rep. 862; Himebaugh v. Same, Id. It is therefore ordered that the appeal be dismissed, without prejudice.
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of and for the period covered by this Report.
 Dated:  August 13, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Mark S. AllioMark S. AllioChairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive OfficerDated:  August 13, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Therese Ann LiutkusTherese Ann Liutkus, CPATreasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2014 (the "Form 10-Q") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").



I, Tracey A. Welsh, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer of the Issuer, certify that to my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 14, 2014



| | /s/ Tracey A. Welsh                                         
| | ------------------------------------------------------------
| | Tracey A. Welsh                                             
| | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.077-1 Scope. ( a ) This specification contains requirements for approving hybrid inflatable personal flotation devices (hybrid PFDs).
( b ) Under this chapter and 33 CFR part 175, certain commercial vessels and recreational boats may carry Type I, II, or III hybrid PFDs to meet carriage requirements. Type V hybrid PFDs may be substituted for other required PFDs if they are worn under conditions prescribed in their manual as required by § 160.077-29 and on their marking as prescribed in § 160.077-31. For recreational boats or boaters involved in a special activity, hybrid PFD approval may also be limited to that activity.
( c ) Unless approved as a Type I SOLAS Lifejacket, a hybrid PFD on an inspected commercial vessel will be approved only— ( 1 ) As work vest; or
( 2 ) For the special purpose stated on the approval certificate and PFD marking.
( d ) A hybrid PFD may be approved for adults, weighing over 40 kg (90 lb); youths, weighing 23-40 kg (50-90 lb); small children, weighing 14-23 kg (30-50 lb); or for the size range of persons for which the design has been tested, as indicated on the PFD's label.
( e ) This specification also contains requirements for— ( 1 ) Manufacturers and sellers of recreational hybrid PFD's to provide an information pamphlet and owner's manual with each PFD; and
( 2 ) Manufacturers of commercial hybrid PFD's to provide a user's manual.
[CGD 78-174, 50 FR 33928, Aug. 22, 1985, as amended by CGD 78-174, 60 FR 2486, Jan. 9, 1995]
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zomex Distribution, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter Buckley, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:				(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and				(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|      /s/ Peter Buckley |
| **Peter Buckley**                               |
| **President and Chief Executive Officer**       |

----