alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

____________ No. 13

- 2558

____________ UNIT ED STATES OF AMERICA

v. TRIST AN GREEN,

Appellant

____________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania District Judge: Honorable Christopher C. Conner M.D. Pa. No. 1

- 08

- cr - 00041

- 001

____________ Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

January 14, 2014 Before: AMBRO, HARDIMAN and GREENAWAY, JR. Circuit Judges

.

(Filed: January 16, 2014 )

____________ OPINION

____________ HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge

. Tristan Green appeals an order of the District Court revoking his supervised release following his conviction s in a subsequent federal case

. While on supervised2

release, Green was char ged in September 2011 with one count of armed bank robbery and one count of use of a firearm during a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(1)(A), 2113(a), 2113(d), and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Based on these charge s , the United States Probation Offi ce petitioned for revocation of Green’s supervised release. Green was tr ied before a jury and convicted of both armed robbery and use of a firearm during a crime of violence

. Consequently, t he District Court revoked Green’s supervised release, sentencing h im to 24 mont hs’ imprisonment

. Green appealed the District Court’s order re voking his supervised release. In doing so, however, Green acknowledged that “the outcome of the instant appeal is wholly dependent upon the outcome of 13

- 2056.” Because we affirmed Green’s convictions in 13

- 2056 on November 14, 2013, United States v. Green , 2013 WL 6017425, we will affirm the order of the District Court revok ing Green’s supervised release in this case

.
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Central Federal Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 14, 2007
    
    
    
    /s/ Mark S. AllioMark S. AllioChairman of the Board, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32**






**CERTIFICATION**




By
      signing below, each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that, to his or her knowledge, (i) this report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lincoln
      Bancorp.




Signed
      this 10 th day of
      May, 2007.




CHIEF
                FINANCIAL OFFICER:
            
            CHIEF
                EXECUTIVE OFFICER:By:
            /s/
                John M. Baer
            
            By:
            /s/
                Jerry R. EngleJohn
                M. Baer
            
            
            Jerry
                R. EngleSecretary
                and Treasurer
            
            
            President
                and Chief Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Lincoln Bancorp and will be retained by
      Lincoln Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 151.02-5 Design of unmanned barges. ( a ) In order not to inhibit design and application, the Commandant may approve vessels of novel design, both new and for conversion, after it is shown to his satisfaction that such a vessel is at least as safe as any vessel which meets the standards required by this part.
( b ) [Reserved]
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Mike L. Wilhelms, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Triad FinancialCorporation, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Triad Financial Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c. Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.              /s/ Mike L. Wilhelms   Mike L. Wilhelms   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   Dated: August 14, 2007
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.1



Amendment to Employment Agreement
This Amendment to the Employment Agreement (the “Amendment”), is entered into as of May 28, 2019, by and between Mark Howell (the “Executive”) and ProPetro Holding Corp., a Texas corporation (together with any of its subsidiaries and Affiliates as may employ the Executive from time to time, and any successor(s) thereto, the Company”, and together with the Executive, the “Parties”).
WHEREAS, the Parties entered into that certain Employment Agreement dated as of February 17, 2017 (the “Employment Agreement”);
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Employment Agreement as hereinafter provided;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth below, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
1.    Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Employment Agreement, the Executive shall be entitled to perform his responsibilities and duties outside of Midland, Texas; provided that the Executive shall still be required to work from Midland, Texas as reasonably needed to serve the Company’s interests.
2.    None of the changes to the Employment Agreement or the Executive’s employment arrangement provided for herein constitute Good Reason (as defined in the Employment Agreement) or Cause (as defined in the Employment Agreement).
3.    Except as modified by the foregoing, the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
4.    This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.
[Signature page follows]
 












IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date and year first above written.
PROPETRO HOLDING CORP.






By:     /s/ Dale Redman______________ 
 Name: Dale Redman
 Title: Chief Executive Officer






MARK HOWELL






/s/ Mark Howell______________


Signature Page to the
Amendment to Employment Agreement for Mark Howell
§ 167.01-7 Ocean or unlimited coastwise vessels on inland and Great Lakes routes. ( a ) Vessels inspected and certificated for ocean or unlimited coastwise routes shall be considered suitable for navigation insofar as the provisions of this subchapter are concerned on any inland route, including the Great Lakes.
[CGFR 59-10, 24 FR 3240, Apr. 25, 1959]
#### Clark v. Donaldson.

*Reference—admission by referee of testimony subject to objection.*

Where evidence which was objected to was admitted by a referee subject to objection, and the referee never decided the objection, but no objection was taken to the course of the referee, *held,*that the party objecting to the evidence must be deemed to have assented to the course of the referee, and there was no error within the case of *Sharpe*v. *Freeman,*45 N. Y. 802.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee.

The action was brought by Thomas 0. Clark against James Donaldson for rent of a stable.

*W. P. Richardson*and *John A. Foster,*for appellant.

*Francis Tillou,*for respondent.

Davis, P. J,

The question involved was principally of fact. The only material point passed upon in the opinion is fully given in the headnote.

*Judgment affirmed.*
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.170 Outer hull steel plating. ( a ) Except as required in paragraph (b) of this section, the outer hull steel plating, including the shell and deck plating must meet the material standards of the American Bureau of Shipping published in “Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels” 1981.
( b ) Along the length of the cargo area, grades of steel must be as follows: ( 1 ) The deck stringer and sheer strake must be at least Grade E steel or a grade of steel that has equivalent chemical properties, mechanical properties, and heat treatment, and that is specially approved by the Commandant (CG-ENG).
( 2 ) The strake at the turn of the bilge must be Grade D, Grade E, or a grade of steel that has equivalent chemical properties, mechanical properties, and heat treatment, and that is specially approved by the Commandant (CG-ENG).
( 3 ) The outer hull steel of vessels must meet the standards in § 154.172 if the hull steel temperature is calculated to be below −5 °C (23 °F) assuming: ( i ) For any waters in the world, the ambient cold conditions of still air at 5 °C (41 °F) and still sea water at 0 °C (32 °F);
( ii ) For cargo containment systems with secondary barriers, the temperature of the secondary barrier is the design temperature; and
( iii ) For cargo containment systems without secondary barriers, the temperature of the cargo tank is the design temperature.
[CGD 74-289, 44 FR 26009, May 3, 1979, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4782, Feb. 3, 1983; CGD 77-069, 52 FR 31630, Aug. 21, 1987]
Cite as 2022 Ark. 40

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

IN RE ARKANSAS BOARD OF LAW 

EXAMINERS

Opinion Delivered: February 17, 2022

PER CURIAM

Blake Clardy of Springdale is appointed to the Arkansas Board of Law Examiners for 

a six-year term concluding on February 17, 2028. Mr. Clardy will be a representative of the 

Third Congressional District and replaces Christopher May, whose term has expired.

The Court extends its sincere appreciation to Mr. Clardy for accepting appointment 

to this important board. The Court also expresses its gratitude to Mr. May for his dedicated 

service to the board.
Order filed September 5, 2013

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00688

- CV

____________ SU BURBAN FARMS, INC. and PARK ON WESTVIEW AP AR T MENT S, LP , Appellant s
V.
CHAMPION ENERGY SERV ICES, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 2

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1002750



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed August 19, 2013 . Our review has determined
that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk’ s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c)

. The record reflects that appellants filed a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law on June 12, 2013, but the request is not included in the record.2

The Harris County Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on
or before Septe mber 23, 2013 , containing appellants ’ request for findings of fact
and conclusions of law filed June 12, 2013

. If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified sta tement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
Editorial Note on Part 199
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 199 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59789, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 199.110 Survival craft muster and embarkation arrangements. ( a ) Each muster station must have sufficient space to accommodate all persons assigned to muster at that station. One or more muster stations must be close to each embarkation station.
( b ) Each muster station and embarkation station must be readily accessible to accommodation and work areas.
( c ) Each muster station and embarkation station must be adequately illuminated by lighting with power supplied from the vessel's emergency source of electrical power.
( d ) Each alleyway, stairway, and exit giving access to a muster and embarkation station must be adequately illuminated by lighting that is capable of having its power supplied by the vessel's emergency source of electrical power.
( e ) Each davit-launched and free-fall survival craft muster station and embarkation station must be arranged to enable stretcher cases to be placed in the survival craft.
( f ) Each launching station, or each two adjacent launching stations, must have an embarkation ladder as follows: ( 1 ) Each embarkation ladder must be approved under approval series 160.117 or be a rope ladder approved under approval series 160.017.
( 2 ) Each embarkation ladder must extend in a single length from the deck to the waterline with the vessel in its lightest seagoing condition under unfavorable conditions of trim and with the vessel listed not less than 15 degrees either way.
( 3 ) Provided that there is at least one embarkation ladder on each side of the vessel, the OCMI may permit additional embarkation ladders to be other approved devices that provide safe and rapid access to survival craft in the water.
( 4 ) The OCMI may accept other safe and effective means of embarkation for use with a liferaft required under § 199.261(e).
( g ) If a davit-launched survival craft is embarked over the edge of the deck, the craft must be provided with a means for bringing it against the side of the vessel and holding it alongside the vessel to allow persons to safely embark.
( h ) If a davit-launched survival craft is not intended to be moved to the stowed position with persons on board, the craft must be provided with a means for bringing it against the side of the vessel and holding it alongside the vessel to allow persons to safely disembark after a drill.
[CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25313, May 20, 1996, as amended by USCG-1998-4442, 63 FR 52192, Sept. 30, 1998; 63 FR 52819, Oct. 1, 1998]
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2201 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2201

To amend part B of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide a 
    floor of 1.0 for the practice expense and for the work expense 
  geographic practice cost indices (GPCI) under the Medicare Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2009

Mr. Braley of Iowa (for himself, Mr. Smith of Nebraska, Mr. Barrow, Mr. 
Teague, Mr. Boucher, and Mr. Kind) introduced the following bill; which 
 was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition 
  to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend part B of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide a 
    floor of 1.0 for the practice expense and for the work expense 
  geographic practice cost indices (GPCI) under the Medicare Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Equity and Accessibility 
Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. MEDICARE GPCI FLOORS.

    (a) Floor of 1.0 for Practice Expenses.--Section 1848(e)(1) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-4(e)(1)) is amended by inserting 
after subparagraph (E) the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(F) Floor at 1.0 for practice expense index.--
                After calculating the practice expense index in 
                subparagraph (A)(ii), for purposes of payment for 
                services furnished on or after January 1, 2010, the 
                Secretary shall increase the practice expense 
                geographic index to 1.00 for any locality for which 
                such practice expense geographic index is less than 
                1.00.''.
    (b) Extension of Floor of 1.0 for Work Expenses.--Subparagraph (E) 
of such section is amended by striking ``and before January 1, 2010,''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 185.724 Quarterly inspections. ( a ) Each winch control apparatus of a launching appliance on a vessel, including motor controllers, emergency switches, master switches, and limit switches, must be examined once in each 3 months.
( b ) The examination required by paragraph (a) of this section must include the removal of drain plugs and the opening of drain valves to make sure that enclosures are free of water.