alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-07-006] 

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

United States International Trade Commission. 

# Time and Date:

April 19, 2007 at 11 a.m. 

# Place:

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000. 

# Status:

Open to the public. 

# Matters to be Considered:

1. Agenda for future meetings: none. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Inv. No. 731-TA-921 (Review) (Folding Gift Boxes from China)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before April 30, 2007.) 

                        5. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-707-709 (Second Review) (Certain Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from Argentina, Brazil, and Germany)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before May 2, 2007).                               ( print page 18668)    

6. Outstanding action jackets: none. 

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: April 10, 2007. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 07-1868 Filed 4-11-07; 12:55 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
§ 169.831 Emergency position indicating radio beacon (EPIRB). The master shall ensure that— ( a ) The EPIRB required in § 169.555 of this subchapter is tested monthly, using the integrated test circuit and output indicator, to determine that it is operative; and
( b ) The EPIRB's battery is replaced after the EPIRB is used and before the marked expiration date.
Argued and submitted October 20, 1995,

affirmed April 17,

petition for review denied June 18, 1996 (323 Or 483)

#### LEO F. MORRICAL, JR., *Appellant, v.*Carlton ZENON, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, *Respondent.*

(92C-12343; CA A86694)

914 P2d 1143

Arnold W. Poole waived oral argument and filed the brief for appellant.

Ann F. Kelley, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Katherine H. Waldo, Assistant Attorney General.

Before Deits, Presiding Judge, and De Muniz and Haselton, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*445PER CURIAM

Petitioner filed 55 claims for post-conviction relief. The post-conviction court dismissed the claims, finding that the petition was frivolous and filed in bad faith. The court awarded attorney fees to defendant under ORCP 17 C (1993)1 and ORS 20.105(1). Petitioner assigns error only to the award of fees, arguing that the court failed to make the analysis of bad faith under ORS 20.105 required by *Mattiza v.*Foster, 311 Or 1, 10, 803 P2d 723 (1990).

However, even if petitioner is correct that the court failed to make sufficient findings under ORS 20.105, it also cited ORCP 17 C (1993) as a basis for the award of attorney fees. The trial court stated that petitioner’s claims had no basis in fact and not “one scintilla” of proof, and that petitioner was not credible. Its formal findings included that the majority of petitioner’s claims were not founded in fact or law, were not made in good faith, and were made in bad faith. Petitioner makes no argument that those findings do not support an award under ORCP 17. Those findings show that the reason for the sanction was a violation of ORCP 17 A.2*Toney v. Armenakis,*139 Or App 464, 912 P2d 911 (1996).

Affirmed.

1

 ORCP 17 was substantially amended by Oregon Laws 1995, chapter 618, section 4. Those amendments do not apply here to the November 1994 award of fees.

2

 Under ORCP 17 A (1993), the signature on a pleading was a certificate that the person signing believes that the pleading is “well grounded in fact and is warranted by existing law[.]”
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, DanielDrummond, Chief Excecutive Officer of UAGH, Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)

the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter endedMarch 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and

(2)

theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

Date:   May 14, 2009

*/s/ Daniel Drummond        *

Daniel Drummond

Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act hasbeen furnished to UAGH, Inc. and will be retained by UAGH, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
§ 159.007-13 Production inspections and tests: Records. ( a ) The manufacturer must have a completed record with the following information for each production inspection and test: ( 1 ) The time, date and place of each inspection and test.
( 2 ) The name and title of each person performing, supervising and witnessing the inspections or tests.
( 3 ) The performance data for each test required in the applicable subpart, including a description of each failure.
( 4 ) A description or photographs of the procedures and apparatus used in the inspections or tests.
( b ) The manufacturer must retain each record under this section for at least 60 months after the month in which the inspection or test was conducted.
( c ) The records must be made available for examination by the Commandant upon request.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2215 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

140 Merriman Road in Garden City, Michigan, as the ‘‘John J. Shivnen 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2009 

Mr. MCCOTTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 140 Merriman Road in Garden City, Michigan, 

as the ‘‘John J. Shivnen Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JOHN J. SHIVNEN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 140 Merriman Road in Garden 

6 City, Michigan, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘John J. Shivnen Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2215 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John J. Shivnen Post 

3 Office Building’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### § 172.095 Intact longitudinal stability.

Each tank barge must be shown by design calculations to have a longitudinal metacentric height (GM) in feet (meters) in each condition of loading and operation, at least equal to the following:

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC01MR91.026/EC01MR91.026_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC01MR91.026/EC01MR91.026_original_size.png)

where—

L = LOA in feet (meters)

d = draft in feet (meters).
#### § 166.05 Course of study for deck students.

The course of study for deck students shall include (a) all the instructions in the rudiments of seamanship and navigation necessary to equip the student fully with the theoretical knowledge required for the proper discharge of the duties developing upon able seaman; (b) a thorough practical training in the mechanics of all operations incident to the sailing and management of a vessel insofar as such operations form a part of the duties of able seamen.
Editorial Note on Part 162
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 162.060-32 Testing and evaluation requirements for active substances, preparations, and relevant chemicals. ( a ) A ballast water management system (BWMS) may not use an active substance or preparation that is a pesticide unless the sale and distribution of such pesticide is authorized under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) for use in ballast water treatment prior to submission to the Coast Guard for approval of the BWMS. This requirement does not apply to the use of active substances or preparations generated solely by the use of a device (as defined under FIFRA) onboard the same vessel as the ballast water to be treated.
( b ) The manufacturer of a BWMS that uses an active substance or preparation that is not a pesticide, or that uses a pesticide that is generated solely by the use of a device (as defined under FIFRA) onboard the same vessel as the ballast water to be treated, must prepare an assessment demonstrating the effectiveness of the BWMS for its intended use, appropriate dosages over all applicable temperatures, hazards of the BWMS, and means for protection of the environment, and public health. This assessment must accompany the application package submitted to the Coast Guard.
#### § 142.300 Excepted vessels.

Excepted vessels, as defined in § 136.110 of this subchapter, need not comply with the provisions of §§ 142.315 through 142.330.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 5 (Friday, January 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 1110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X10-850108]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

 [Public Notice 6862]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Marina Abramovic: The Artist Is Present''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Marina Abramovic: The Artist Is Present,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of 
Modern Art, New York, NY, from on or about March 14, 2010, until on or 
about May 31, 2010, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues 
yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of 
these Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 4, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-146 Filed 1-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.051-9 Design and performance of A and B inflatable liferafts. To obtain Coast Guard approval, each A and B inflatable liferaft must comply with the requirements in subpart 160.151, with the following exceptions: ( a ) *Capacity (IMO LSA Code chapter IV/4.1.2.1).* The carrying capacity must be not less than four persons.
( b ) *Markings (IMO LSA Code, chapter IV/4.2.6.3).* The type of equipment pack must be identified as “A” or “B”, respectively, instead of “SOLAS A” or “SOLAS B”. No “SOLAS” markings may appear on the container.
[CGD 85-205, 62 FR 25546, May 9, 1997. Redesignated and amended by USCG-2010-0048, 76 FR 62975, 62976, Oct. 11, 2011]
# C_2012151EN.01002901.xml

| 26.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/29

---

Order of the General Court of 27 March 2012 — European Goldfields v Commission

(Case T-261/11) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - State aid - Subsidy granted by the Greek authorities in favour of the mining company Ellinikos Xrysos consisting of the transfer of the Cassandra mines at a price lower than the real market value and exemption from taxes on that transaction - Decision declaring the aid unlawful and ordering its recovery, with interest - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 151/47

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Goldfields Ltd (Whitehorse, Yukon (Canada)) (represented by: K. Adamantopoulos, E. Petritsi, E. Trova and P. Skouris, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier and D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

APPLICATION for the annulment of Commission Decision 2011/452/EU of 23 February 2011 on the State aid C 48/08 (ex NN 61/08) implemented by Greece in favour of Ellinikos Xrysos SA (OJ 2011 L 193, p. 27).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as being inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

| 2. | European Goldfields Ltd shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

European Goldfields Ltd shall pay the costs.

| 3. | There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene by Ellinikos Xrysos AE Metalleion kai Viomixanias Xrysou. |
| --- | --- |

3.

There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene by Ellinikos Xrysos AE Metalleion kai Viomixanias Xrysou.

---

(1)  OJ C 219, 23.7.2011.

1

---
§ 122.520 Abandon ship and man overboard drills and training. ( a ) The master shall conduct sufficient drills and give sufficient instructions to make sure that all crew members are familiar with their duties during emergencies that necessitate abandoning ship or the recovery of persons who have fallen overboard.
( b ) An abandon ship drill must be conducted as follows: ( 1 ) Each member of the crew shall participate in at least one abandon ship drill each month; and
( 2 ) If more than 25% of the crew have not participated in an abandon ship drill on board that particular vessel or sister vessel in the previous month, a drill must be conducted before the vessel gets underway with passengers aboard.
( c ) Each abandon ship drill must include: ( 1 ) Summoning the crew to report to assigned stations and prepare for assigned duties;
( 2 ) Summoning passengers on a vessel on an overnight voyage to areas of refuge or embarkation stations and ensuring that they are made aware of how the order to abandon ship will be given;
( 3 ) Checking that life jackets are correctly donned;
( 4 ) Operation of any davits used for launching liferafts; and
( 5 ) Instruction on the automatic and manual deployment of survival craft.
( d ) Each abandon ship drill must, as far as practicable, be conducted as if there were an actual emergency.
( e ) Each rescue boat required in accordance with § 117.210 of this subchapter must be launched with its assigned crew aboard and maneuvered in the water as if during the actual man overboard situation; ( 1 ) Once each month, if reasonable and practicable; but
( 2 ) At least once within a 3 month period before the vessel gets underway with passengers.
( f ) Onboard training in the use of davit launched liferafts must take place at intervals of not more than 3 months on a vessel with a davit launched liferaft.
( g ) Abandon ship and man overboard drills and training shall be logged or otherwise documented for review by the Coast Guard upon request. The drill entry shall include the following information: ( 1 ) Date of the drill and training; and
( 2 ) General description of the drill scenario and training topics.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 935, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51353, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58283, Sept. 29, 2014]
MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: April 7, 2011 Conference Call with Senator Snowe’s Office and Katahdin Paper 

on the 2011 NHSM Final Rule

FROM: Tab Tesnau

Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery 

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329 

 

On April 7, 2011, EPA participants were scheduled to call members of Senator Olympia 

Snowe’s office and Katahdin Paper to discuss their issues and concerns with the final rule 

entitled, “Identification of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials That are Solid Waste,” which 

was published in the Federal Register on March 21, 2011 (76 FR 15456). This is referred to as 

the 2011 NHSM Final Rule. 

During that conference call, attendees expressed concerns with the rule’s characterization of 

several NHSMs and potential impacts to the Katahdin Paper company. 

EPA asked clarifying questions regarding the information presented. 

Expected or Invited Meeting Attendants:

Members of Senator Olympia Snow’s Office 

Representatives from Katahdin Paper 

Jim Berlow, EPA 

Randy Deitz, EPA 

George Faison, EPA
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.018-5 Specifications and standards incorporated by reference. ( a ) The following federal and military specifications and standards are incorporated by reference into this subpart: ( 1 ) Federal Specification L-P-375 C (April 23, 1970), entitled “Plastic Film, Flexible, Vinyl Chloride”, as amended by Amendment 2 of December 2, 1976.
( 2 ) Federal Specification L-S-300 B (July 12, 1974), entitled “Sheeting and Tape, Reflective: Nonexposed Lens, Adhesive Backing.”
( 3 ) Federal Specification CCC-C-426 D (August 12, 1970), entitled “Cloth, Drill, Cotton.”
( 4 ) Federal Specification CCC-C-443 E (December 2, 1974), entitled “Cloth, Duck, Cotton (Single and Plied Filling Yarns, Flat).”
( 5 ) Federal Test Method Standard 141a (September 1, 1965), entitled “Paint, Varnish, Lacquer and Related Materials; Methods of Inspection, Sampling and Testing.” (Method 6141 “Washability of Paints”, and Method 6142 “Scrub Resistance” as amended May 1, 1974).
( 6 ) Federal Test Method Standard 370 (March 1, 1977), entitled “Instrumental Photometric Measurements of Retroreflective Materials and Retroreflective Devices.”
( 7 ) Military Specification MIL-C-17415 E (April 16, 1964), entitled “Cloth, Coated, and Webbing, Inflatable Boat and Miscellaneous Use”, as amended by Amendment 5 of April 26, 1976.
( 8 ) Military Specification MIL-R-21607 D (August 5, 1976), entitled “Resins, Polyester, Low Pressure Laminating, Fire-retardant.”
( 9 ) Military Specification MIL-C-43006 E (March 24, 1978), entitled “Cloth and Strip Laminated, Vinyl Nylon High Strength, Flexible.”
( b ) The Federal standards may be obtained from the General Services Administration, Federal Acquisition Service, Office of the FAS Commissioner, 2200 Crystal Drive, 11th Floor, Arlington, VA 22202; telephone 703-605-5400. The Military Specifications may be obtained from the Military Specifications and Standards, Standardization Documents Order Desk, Building 4D, 700 Robbins Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094, *https://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/ .”* These materials are also on file in the Federal Register library.
( c ) Approval to incorporate by reference the materials listed in this section was obtained from the Director of the Federal Register on June 14, 1979.
( d ) When changes are made to a specification or standard incorporated by reference into this subpart, the effective date for its use will be the effective date set by the issuing authority unless otherwise determined by the Coast Guard.
[CGD 76-028, 44 FR 38786, July 2, 1979, as amended by USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60162, Sept. 30, 2013]
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 4- 30 03

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Am arjitSin gh ; M an

jitKaur ; Dri pi nd er Si ng h ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lPeti ti on er s

v. Lore tt a E. Ly

nc h, Att orne y

Gene ral of t he Uni te d S ta te s 1 ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lResp on de nt

__ __ __ __ __ __ Pet it io n fo r Rev ie w of a n Ord er o f th e Bo ardof I m

m ig rat io n Ap pe al s

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: May 5, 20 15 Fi le d: May 14, 2 01 5 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, MURPHY, an d GRUENDER, Ci rcu itJu dg es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM. Am arjit Si ng h, hi s wife Ma nj it K au r, an d th ei r so n Drip in de r Si ng h, na ti ve s an d ci ti zen s of In di a, pe ti ti on fo r rev ie w of a de ci si on of th e Bo ard of Im m ig rat io n
Lore tt a E. Ly

nc h is subs ti tu te d fo r he r pr ed eces so r, Eric H. Hol de r, Jr ., as th e 1 Att orne y Gene ral of t he Uni te d S ta te s. Se e Fed . R. App . P. 43 (c)( 2)
.App eal s (BIA) de nyin g th ei r fo urth m ot io n to r e o p e n r em ov al pr oc eed in gs . Afte r

care fu l rev ie w, we co nc lu de th at th e BIA did no t abu se it s di sc ret io n in de nyin g th e m ot io n as un ti m el y an d nu m eri cal ly ba rred
. Se e Zh en g v. Muk as ey , 52 3 F.3 d 89 3 (8 th Ci r. 20 08 ). Acco rd in gl y , we den y th e p et it io n fo r rev ie w. Se e 8t h C ir. R . 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2
-