alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
99.7



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. §1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the amended annual report of Westport
Innovations Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F/A for the period ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David R. Demers, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|March 27, 2014 | /s/ David R. Demers    
|-------------- | -----------------------
|               |                        
|               | David R. Demers        
|               | Chief Executive Officer



This certification accompanies this amended annual report
on Form 40-F/A pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.
§ 92.204 Accessibility of information and communication technology for individuals with disabilities. ( a ) A covered entity must ensure that its health programs and activities provided through information and communication technology are accessible to individuals with disabilities, unless doing so would result in undue financial and administrative burdens or a fundamental alteration in the nature of the health programs or activities. If an action required to comply with this section would result in such an alteration or such burdens, a covered entity shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that, to the maximum extent possible, individuals with disabilities receive the benefits or services of the health program or activity provided by the covered entity.
( b ) A recipient or State Exchange shall ensure that its health programs and activities provided through websites and mobile applications comply with the requirements of section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, as interpreted consistent with title II of the ADA (42 U.S.C. 12131 through 12165).
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.1115 Discharge. ( a ) The discharge density of each water spray system must be at least: ( 1 ) 10000 cm3/m2/min. (0.25 gpm/ft.2) over each horizontal surface; and
( 2 ) 4000 cm3/m2/min. (0.10 gpm/ft.2) against vertical surface, including the water rundown.
( b ) The water spray protection under § 154.1110 (d) and (e) must cover an area in a horizontal plane extending at least 0.5 m (19 in.) in each direction from the pipes, fittings, and valves, or the area of the drip tray, whichever is greater.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Housing Finance Board

# Time and Date:

The meeting of the Board of Directors is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. on Thursday, January 18, 2007. 

# Place:

Board Room, First Floor, Federal Housing Finance Board, 1625 Eye Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006. 

# Status:

The meeting will be open to the public. 

# Matter to be Considered:

*Appointment of Federal Home Loan Bank Directors.*

# Contact Person For More Information:

                        Shelia Willis, Paralegal Specialist, Office of General Counsel, at 202-408-2876 or                         *williss@fhfb.gov.*

Dated: January 12, 2007. 

By the Federal Housing Finance Board. 

John P. Kennedy, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 07-188 Filed 1-12-07; 3 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
# C_2011139EN.01003001.xml

| 7.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/30

---

Action brought on 21 January 2011 — Mariën v Commission

(Case F-5/11)

2011/C 139/55

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Peter Mariën (Elsene, Belgium) (represented by: B. Theeuwes and F. Pons, attorneys)

Applicant:

Defendant: European commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decision of Head of the EU Delegation to Afghanistan which ordered to members of this Delegation to leave their hotel and to move into a housing compound of the EU.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision contained in the e-mail message of January 11, 2011 of EU Special Representative and Head of the EU Delegation to Afghanistan ordering the Applicant to relocate on January 14, 2011 to the residential compound in Kabul, Afghanistan; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision contained in the e-mail message of January 11, 2011 of EU Special Representative and Head of the EU Delegation to Afghanistan ordering the Applicant to relocate on January 14, 2011 to the residential compound in Kabul, Afghanistan;

| — | order the Commission to bear all costs relating to the temporary residence measures; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to bear all costs relating to the temporary residence measures;

| — | order the Commission to pay an indemnity of 10 000 euros to the Applicant for the psychological stress and harm caused; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay an indemnity of 10 000 euros to the Applicant for the psychological stress and harm caused;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

---
# C_2012065EN.01000401.xml

| 3.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/4

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano (Italy) on 30 November 2011 — Criminal proceedings against Vincenzo Veneruso

(Case C-612/11)

2012/C 65/07

Language of the case: Italian

Referring Court

Referring Court

Tribunale di Milano

Party in the main proceedings

Party in the main proceedings

Vincenzo Veneruso

Questions referred

Questions referred

Do Articles 43 EC and 49 EC on freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services in the sporting bets industry authorise national legislation establishing a monopoly regime and a system of concessions and authorisations which, in the context of a given number of concessions, makes provision for:

| (a) | the existence of a general tendency to protect the holders of concessions granted during an earlier period on the basis of a procedure which unlawfully excluded some of the operators; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the existence of a general tendency to protect the holders of concessions granted during an earlier period on the basis of a procedure which unlawfully excluded some of the operators;

| (b) | the presence of provisions which de facto guarantee the maintenance of commercial positions acquired at the end of a procedure which unlawfully excluded some of the operators (as, for example, the prohibition on new concession holders from installing their counters at less than a given distance from those already existing; and |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the presence of provisions which de facto guarantee the maintenance of commercial positions acquired at the end of a procedure which unlawfully excluded some of the operators (as, for example, the prohibition on new concession holders from installing their counters at less than a given distance from those already existing; and

| (c) | the fixing of hypotheses for the expiry of the concession and the acquisition of guarantees of a very high amount, such hypotheses including that in which the concessionnaire directly or indirectly operates cross-border gaming activities comparable with those forming the subject-matter of the concession? |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the fixing of hypotheses for the expiry of the concession and the acquisition of guarantees of a very high amount, such hypotheses including that in which the concessionnaire directly or indirectly operates cross-border gaming activities comparable with those forming the subject-matter of the concession?

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Section1350 Certification**

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, the undersigned officer of Nextera Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”)hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(i)  the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Reportfairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: May 15, 2007 |
|--------------------|
|               |
|               | By:   /s/  Joseph J. Millin |   |
|               | President |
|               | (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

----
Order entered March 31, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01431-CV

TOWN OF HIGHLAND PARK, Appellant

V.

TIFFANY RENEE MCCULLERS, INDIVIDUALLY AND FOR THE 

BENEFIT OF CALVIN

MARCUS MCCULLERS AND CALVIN BENNETT MCCULLERS AND 

ANF OF C.J., MINOR, AND

SONYA HOSKINS, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-08709

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s March 27, 2020 unopposed motion for an 

extension of time to file appellant’s opening brief. We GRANT the motion and 

ORDER appellant’s opening brief to be filed on or before April 13, 2020.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
Case 2:14-cv-14907-PDB-EAS ECF No. 9 filed 03/09/15 PageID.18 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.139-4 Approval procedures. ( a ) Manufacturers that desire type approval should submit a written notice to the Commandant (CG-ENG-4) describing the product and its intended uses. The Commandant will evaluate this information and notify the manufacturer of the product's suitability for testing. The manufacturer should then contract directly with an accepted independent laboratory to perform the required tests and inspections.
( b ) Upon completion of the required testing and inspections, the manufacturer must submit either a written request for type approval to the Commandant (CG-ENG-4), United States Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, or electronically submit a request to *typeapproval@uscg.mil .* The request must indicate the name and address of the manufacturer, all product designations, and the address of all manufacturing facilities. The request must include a copy of the final fire test report and the production inspection procedures. From the information submitted, the Commandant determines whether or not the product is acceptable for type approval. If the product is determined to be acceptable, a type approval certificate valid for a 5-year period will be issued. If the product is not accepted, the manufacturer will be notified of the reasons why.
Exhibit 10.1

    

     

    

    RESIGNATION by

    The Director, CEO 

    of

    SEEDO CORP.

    

    

    The following is a true copy of the Director, and Chief Executive Officer’s Resignation from the Corporation, held this 24th day of
      June, 2020;

     

    WHEREAS the undersigned was appointed as Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and has served in said capacity to
      date, he has determined at this time to formally RESIGN and renounce all further corporate designation or affiliation with SEEDO CORP.

    

    

    
      At present, there are no other Board or Executive Officers. I shall remain interim Director and Chief Executive Officer until the very next Shareholder’s Meeting, at which time the Shareholders shall choose the new officers of the Company. Upon
        the new Board’s election, this Resignation shall become immediately effective, and my Resignation shall take effect, and shall serve to sever any and all official ties, duties, obligations or liabilities regarding SEEDO CORP. 

      

      

      

    

    
      	
              
                DATED: 24th June, 2020 

              

            


    

     

    

    
      
        
                      

          ____________________
          
            
              Zohar Levy, Dir., CEO

              SEEDO CORP.
Document

Exhibit 10.17
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This First Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement effective December 29, 2017 (the “Employment Agreement”)(the “Agreement”) by and between Everi Payments Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and wholly owned subsidiary of Everi Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Everi Holdings”), and Harper H. Ko (the “Executive”) is made as of April 1, 2020 (the “Effective Date”).
R E C I T A L S
A.The Company desires to amend the Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment and Executive is willing to continue employment on the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment.


B.The Company and Executive (together, the “Parties”) wish to enter into the Amendment.


AMENDMENT


NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing recitals and in consideration of the commitments set forth below, the Parties agree as follows:


1. Definitions and Interpretation.  Except as otherwise provided herein, capitalized terms used in this Amendment shall have the definitions set forth in the Agreement amended hereby.


2.Terms of the Agreement.  Except as expressly modified hereby, all terms, conditions and provisions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.


3.Conflicting Terms.  In the event of any inconsistency or conflict between the Agreement and this Amendment, or the applicable form of agreement of any Equity Awards, including the Restricted Stock Agreement, and this Amendment, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall govern and control.
4.Entire Agreement. This Amendment and the Agreement constitute the entire and exclusive agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof.  All previous discussions and agreements with respect to the subject matter are superseded by the Agreement and this Amendment.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


5.Amendments.  


a.Section 2.5:  The phrase “in a quantity and” is hereby deleted and the phrase “and Chief Operating Officer” hereby is inserted in their entirety into the first sentence of Section 2.5, such that the amended sentence reads as follows:
“Executive will be eligible to receive restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance awards, stock options or other equity awards with a frequency substantially similar to those regularly awarded to other members of the Company’s senior executive management, other than the Chief 
Page 1 of 2








Executive Officer and or Chief Operating Officer, (each, an “Equity Award”) under the applicable equity incentive plan of Everi Holdings as then in effect (the “Plan”), as determined by the Compensation Committee.”
  
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this Agreement as of the date first set forth above.
 
 
												
	EVERI PAYMENTS INC.		 	EXECUTIVE
	 		 	 
	By:	/s/ Michael D. Rumbolz	 	/s/ Harper H. Ko
	 	Michael D. Rumbolz	 	Harper H. Ko
	 	Chief Executive Officer	 	 


 


Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2162 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2162

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 14, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 123 11th Avenue South in Nampa, Idaho, as the ``Herbert A Littleton 
                           Postal Station''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HERBERT A LITTLETON POSTAL STATION.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 123 11th Avenue South in Nampa, Idaho, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Herbert A Littleton Postal Station''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Herbert A 
Littleton Postal Station''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 13, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Barry L. Lazarus, the Chief Financial Officer of Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                   



|    |                        
|--- | -----------------------
|    | /s/ BARRY L. LAZARUS   
|    |                        
|By: | Barry L. Lazarus       
|    | Chief Financial Officer
|    | Date: November 7, 2004
2:14-mj-30554-DUTY Doc # 25 Filed 02/11/15 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 38
2:14-mj-30554-DUTY Doc # 25 Filed 02/11/15 Pg 2 of 5 Pg ID 39
2:14-mj-30554-DUTY Doc # 25 Filed 02/11/15 Pg 3 of 5 Pg ID 40
2:14-mj-30554-DUTY Doc # 25 Filed 02/11/15 Pg 4 of 5 Pg ID 41
2:14-mj-30554-DUTY Doc # 25 Filed 02/11/15 Pg 5 of 5 Pg ID 42
# C_2013129EN.01001801.xml

| 4.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 March 2013 — Event v OHIM — CBT Comunicación Multimedia (eventer EVENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS)

(Case T-353/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark eventer EVENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS - Earlier national word mark Event - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 129/34

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Event Holding GmbH & Co. KG (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: G. Schoenen and V. Töbelmann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: CBT Comunicación Multimedia (Getxo, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 March 2011 (Case R 939/2010-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Event Holding GmbH & Co. KG and CBT Comunicación Multimedia, SL

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Event Holding GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Event Holding GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.

1

---