alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.142-2 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this subpart with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material is available for inspection at the U.S. Coast Guard, Office of Design and Engineering Standards (CG-ENG), 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, and is available from the sources listed below. It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html*.
( b ) International Maritime Organization (IMO) Publishing, 4 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR, United Kingdom, +44 (0)20 7735 7611, *http://www.imo.org*. ( 1 ) 2010 FTP Code, International Code for Application of Fire Test Procedures, 2010 (Resolution MSC.307(88)), 2012 Edition (“FTP Code”), IBR approved for § 164.142-3(a).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
# C_2011179EN.01002201.xml

| 18.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/22

---

Action brought on 5 April 2011 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-36/11)

2011/C 179/37

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (Etterbeck, Belgium) (represented by: T. Bontinck and S. Woog, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

First, annulment of the decision not to extend the applicant’s contract beyond its expiry date and, consequently, reinstatement of the applicant in his duties as from 1 November 2010. Second, an order that the Commission pay to the applicant a sum of EUR 10 000 in compensation for non-material damage suffered and to bear the financial costs incurred in the pre litigation procedure.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision contained in the note of 30 August 2010 informing the applicant that his contract would not be extended beyond its expiry date; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision contained in the note of 30 August 2010 informing the applicant that his contract would not be extended beyond its expiry date;

| — | consequently, reinstate the applicant in his duties in the delegation to Albania as from 1 November 2010 and order the defendant to pay his remuneration retrospectively. Failing such reinstatement, order the defendant to pay unemployment allowances until the applicant is again in employment; |
| --- | --- |

—

consequently, reinstate the applicant in his duties in the delegation to Albania as from 1 November 2010 and order the defendant to pay his remuneration retrospectively. Failing such reinstatement, order the defendant to pay unemployment allowances until the applicant is again in employment;

| — | withdraw the contested decision and any document linked to this procedure from the applicant’s personal file; |
| --- | --- |

—

withdraw the contested decision and any document linked to this procedure from the applicant’s personal file;

| — | order the Commission to pay to the applicant the sum of EUR 10 000 in compensation for the non-material damage suffered, subject to increase in the course of proceedings, and to bear the financial costs incurred in the pre-litigation procedure; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay to the applicant the sum of EUR 10 000 in compensation for the non-material damage suffered, subject to increase in the course of proceedings, and to bear the financial costs incurred in the pre-litigation procedure;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
§ 15.515 Compliance with certificate of inspection. ( a ) Except as provided by § 15.725 of this part, no vessel may be navigated unless it has in its service and onboard the crew complement required by the COI.
( b ) Any time passengers are embarked on a passenger vessel, the vessel must have the crew complement required by the COI, whether the vessel is underway, at anchor, made fast to shore, or aground. However, the master may allow reduced crew for limited or special operating conditions subject to the approval of the OCMI.
( c ) No vessel subject to inspection under 46 U.S.C. 3301 will be navigated unless it is under the direction and control of an individual who holds an appropriate license or officer endorsement on his or her MMC.
[USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 78002, Dec. 24, 2013]
§ 163.003-1 Scope. ( a ) This subpart contains standards and approval and production tests for a pilot ladder used on a merchant vessel to embark and disembark pilots and other persons when away from the dock.
( b ) The requirements in this subpart apply to a pilot ladder designed for use along a vertical portion of a vessel's hull.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

LESLEE SILVERMAN TABAS AND RICHARD S. TABAS,

Petitioners

v.

MAIN LINE HEALTH, INC., LANKENAU

HOSPITAL A/K/A LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER, JOHN J. LYNCH, III, DANIEL C. LAZOWICK, D.O., JEROME SANTORO, M.D., THOMAS P. SOLLECITO, D.M.D., PHILLIP D. ROBINSON, FACHE W. RANDALL RUSSELL, M.D., MAIN LINE HEALTH HOME CARE AND HOSPICE,

MOUNTAIN LAUREL RISK RETENTION GROUP, INC.,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 470 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of January, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the annual  report on Form  10-KSB of Biofield  Corp.  (the
"Company")  for the year ended  December 31, 2006, as filed with the  Securities

and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Covered  Report"),  I, Michael J. Antonoplos,  Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company,  pursuant to 18

U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:



The Covered  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



The information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have  executed this  certificate  as of this 22nd day of
October 2007.



/s/ Michael J. Antonoplos

Michael J. Antonoplos

Chief Executive Officer and Director
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (the "Amendment") to the Annual Report of Ticketmaster
Entertainment, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (together
with the Amendment, the "Report"), we, Irving Azoff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Brian Regan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:



Date: April 30, 2009

/s/IRVING AZOFF Irving Azoff Chief Executive OfficerDate: April 30, 2009

/s/BRIAN REGAN Brian Regan Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1898]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Commission on Digestive Diseases, June 18, 2007, 9 a.m. to June 19, 
2007, 12 p.m., Sheraton Crystal City, 1800 Jefferson Davis Highway (Rt. 
1), Grand Ballroom C, Arlington, VA 22202 which was published in the 
Federal Register on March 28, 2007, 72 FR 14597.
    To elaborate on times and dates of the meeting: June 18, 2007 from 
9 a.m. until 5 p.m. and on June 19, 2007 from 9 a.m. until 12 noon. The 
meeting is open to the public.

    Dated: April 11, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1898 Filed 4-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RANDY A. HAMDAN, an individual, Case No. 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM

Hon. Gershwin A. Drain

Plaintiff,

v.

MATT FINSTON, an individual

Defendant.

HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS PLLC

Michael F. Wais (P45482)

Jeff A. Hoover (P71447) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

450 West Fourth Street

Royal Oak, MI 48067-2557

(248) 645-1483

mwais@howardandhoward.com

jhoover@howardandhoward.com

VOLUNTARY NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO 

FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)

Plaintiff, Randy A. Hamdan, by and through counsel, Howard & Howard Attorneys, 

PLLC, hereby submits his Voluntary Notice of Dismissal Without Prejudice pursuant to FRCP 

41(a)(1)(A).

Respectfully Submitted,

Dated: September 5, 2014 By: /s/ Michael F. Wais

Michael F. Wais (P45482)

Jeffrey A. Hoover (P71447) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

450 West Fourth Street

Royal Oak, MI 48067

(248) 645-1483

Email: mwais@howardandhoward.com

Case 2:14-cv-12949-GAD-MKM ECF No. 3 filed 09/05/14 PageID.64 Page 1 of 1
§ 180.72 Personal flotation devices carried in addition to life jackets. ( a ) Equipment carried under this section is not acceptable in lieu of any portion of the required number of approved life jackets and must not be substituted for the approved life jackets required to be worn during drills and emergencies.
( b ) Wearable marine buoyant devices that include “ski vests,” “boating vests,” and “fishing vests,” approved in accordance with § 160.064 in subchapter Q of this chapter, or other standard specified by the Commandant, may be carried as additional equipment.
( c ) Buoyant work vests approved in accordance with § 160.053 in subchapter Q of this chapter, or other standard specified by the Commandant, may be carried as additional equipment for use of persons working near or over the water.
( d ) Commercial hybrid personal flotation devices (PFD) approved in accordance with § 160.077 of this chapter, or other standard specified by the Commandant, may be carried as additional equipment for use of persons working near or over the water. Each commercial hybrid PFD must be: ( 1 ) Used, stowed, and maintained in accordance with the procedures set out in the manual required for these devices under § 160.077-29 in subchapter Q of this chapter and any limitation(s) marked on them; and
( 2 ) Of the same or similar design and have the same method of operation as each other hybrid PFD carried on board.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.052-4 Materials—nonstandard vests. ( a ) *General.* All materials used in nonstandard buoyant vests must be equivalent to those specified in § 160.052-3 and be obtained from a supplier who furnishes an affidavit in accordance with the requirement in § 160.052-3(a).
( b ) *Cover.* A vinyl-dip coating may be allowed for the covering of the vest instead of a fabric envelope if the coating meets the requirements in § 160.055-5(b)(2) of this chapter except there is no color restriction.
( c ) *Reinforcing tape.* When used, the reinforcing tape around the neck shall be 3 ⁄ 4′′ cotton tape weighing not less than 0.18 ounces per linear yard having a minimum breaking strength of not less than 120 pounds.
[CGFR 65-37, 30 FR 11588, Sept. 10, 1965, as amended by CGD 72-90R, 37 FR 10837, May 31, 1972; 37 FR 11774, June 14, 1972, CGD 72-163R, 38 FR 8120, Mar. 28, 1973]
#### § 167.01-1 Basis and purpose of part.

The rules and regulations in this part are prescribed and apply to public nautical school ships, except vessels of the Navy or Coast Guard. It is the intent of the regulations in this part to provide minimum standards for vessels used as nautical school ships in accordance with the various inspection statutes and to obtain their correct and uniform application. This part is not applicable to civilian nautical school ships.

[CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51216, Sept. 30, 1997]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

PEGGY MALLOY SOLACK,

MICHAEL SOLACK, AND

JONATHAN MATHIS,

Case No. 15-cv-10084

Hon. Marianne O. Battani

Plaintiffs,

v.

OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE, INC,

BEAUMONT HEALTH, AND

MORRIS COTTON,

Defendants.

GOLD STAR LAW, P.C. BUTZEL LONG, P.C.

MAIA E. JOHNSON (P40533) REBECCA S. DAVIES (P52728)

DAVID A HARDESTY (P38609) Attorneys for Defendants

Attorneys for Plaintiff 150 W. Jefferson Ave., Ste. 100

2701 Troy Center Dr., Ste. 400 Detroit, MI 48226

Troy, Michigan 48084 (313) 225-7028

(248) 275-5200 davies@butzel.com

mjohnson@goldstarlaw.com

dhardesty@goldstarlaw.com

STIPULATED ORDER TO DISMISS CASE WITH

 PREDJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS

Plaintiffs, individually and by their attorneys, and Defendant stipulate to

entry by the Court of an order containing the text appearing below:

Based upon the stipulation of the parties to this action submitted to this

Court, IT IS ORDERED that the Complaint is dismissed with prejudice and each

Case 2:15-cv-10084-MOB-RSW ECF No. 25 filed 06/07/17 PageID.378 Page 1 of 2
party to bear their own costs and attorney fees. The Court retains jurisdiction to

vacate this Order upon good cause shown that settlement has not been completed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the entry of this Order resolves the last

pending claim and closes the case.

STIPULATED BY:

/s/ David A. Hardesty

David A. Hardesty 

Plaintiffs’ Counsel

/s/ Rebecca S. Davies (with permission)

Rebecca S. Davies

Defendants’ Counsel

SO ORDERED:

Date: June 7, 2017 s/Marianne O. Battani

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

United States District Judge

2

Case 2:15-cv-10084-MOB-RSW ECF No. 25 filed 06/07/17 PageID.379 Page 2 of 2
# C_2011269EN.01002702.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/27

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Breda (Netherlands) lodged on 27 June 2011 — A. T. G. M. Van de Ven & M. A. H. T. Van de Ven-Janssen v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V.

(Case C-315/11)

2011/C 269/51

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank Breda

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants:

| | A. T. G. M. Van de Ven |
| --- | --- |

A. T. G. M. Van de Ven

| | M. A. H. T. Van de Ven-Janssen |
| --- | --- |

M. A. H. T. Van de Ven-Janssen

Defendant: Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V.

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is a right to compensation in case of delay, as described in Article 7 of Regulation No 261/2004, (1) consistent with the last sentence of Article 29 of the Montreal Convention, (2) given the fact that, according to the first sentence of Article 29 of the Montreal Convention, actions for damages founded in contract, in tort or otherwise, can only be brought subject to the conditions and such limits of liability as are set out in the Montreal Convention? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is a right to compensation in case of delay, as described in Article 7 of Regulation No 261/2004, (1) consistent with the last sentence of Article 29 of the Montreal Convention, (2) given the fact that, according to the first sentence of Article 29 of the Montreal Convention, actions for damages founded in contract, in tort or otherwise, can only be brought subject to the conditions and such limits of liability as are set out in the Montreal Convention?

1

2

| 2. | If a right to compensation in case of delay, as described in Article 7 of Regulation No 261/2004, is not consistent with Article 29 of the Montreal Convention, are any limitations then imposed in respect of the moment when the ruling of the Court of Justice enters into effect as regards the present case and/or in general? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If a right to compensation in case of delay, as described in Article 7 of Regulation No 261/2004, is not consistent with Article 29 of the Montreal Convention, are any limitations then imposed in respect of the moment when the ruling of the Court of Justice enters into effect as regards the present case and/or in general?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1)

1

(2)  See Council Decision 2001/539/EC of 5 April 2001 on the conclusion by the European Community of the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air (the Montreal Convention) (OJ 2001 L 194, p. 38)

2

---
EXHIBIT 12B TO THE

FORM 20-F of

BIRCH MOUNTAIN RESOURCES LTD.

Dated June 24, 2003



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002



CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER









BIRCH MOUNTAIN RESOURCES LTD.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Birch Mountain Resources Ltd.

(the "Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002 as

filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the

"Report"), I, Donald L. Dabbs, Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant

to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



June 24, 2003





| | /s/Donald L. Dabbs
                        Donald L. Dabbs,
        Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 287.110 Who is eligible to receive assistance or services under a Tribe's NEW Program? ( a ) A Tribe must specify in its NEW Program plan the population and service area to be served. In cases where a Tribe designates a service area for its NEW Program that is different from its Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) service area, an explanation must be provided.
( b ) A Tribe must include eligibility criteria in its plan and establish internal operating procedures that clearly specify the criteria to be used to establish an individual's eligibility for NEW services. The eligibility criteria must be equitable.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ROBERT JAMISON, #526783,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 2:14-CV-14913

v. HONORABLE VICTORIA A. ROBERTS

LARRY JOE WEEKS, ET AL.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

In December, 2014, Michigan prisoner Robert Jamison (“Plaintiff’) filed a pro se Prisoner

Civil Rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that he was coerced into taking a

polygraph examination by Morenci Police Chief Larry Joe Weeks and FBI agents and that he was

subject to excessive force by a Morenci police officer. At the time he instituted this action, Plaintiff

did not pay the required filing and administrative fees, nor did he properly apply to proceed without

prepayment of those fees. Under the provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, if a

prisoner wishes to proceed in forma pauperis, i.e., without prepayment of the filing fee, the prisoner

must file a certified trust account statement and an affidavit of indigence. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2);

McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 605 (6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds,

LaFountain v. Harry, 716 F.3d 944, 951 (6th Cir. 2013). Plaintiff did not do so. Consequently, the

Court issued a deficiency order requiring him to either pay the filing and administrative fees or

submit a properly completed application with supporting documents to proceed without prepayment

of the fees within 30 days – by February 12, 2015. The order provided that if Plaintiff did not do

so, his case would be dismissed. Plaintiff failed to correct the deficiency within the allotted time.

2:14-cv-14913-VAR-MKM Doc # 5 Filed 02/23/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 12
Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Prisoner Civil Rights

Complaint. The Court makes no determination as to the merits of the case. Lastly, the Court

concludes that appeal from this decision cannot be taken in good faith. This case is closed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S/Victoria A. Roberts

VICTORIA A. ROBERTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: February 23, 2015

2

2:14-cv-14913-VAR-MKM Doc # 5 Filed 02/23/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 13
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 08902

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name Description

x 08902\08902_Checklist.xlsx EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

08902\08902_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

08902\08902_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 08902\08902_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08902\08902_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08902\08902_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08902\08902_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08902\08902_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08902\08902_PartF.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08902\08902_PartG.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08902\08902_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

08902\Certification Statement Plant ID 08902.pdf Plant certification statement

x 08902\Supplemental Documents\08902_A5-2 Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08902\Supplemental Documents\08902_A5-3 wb-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08902\Supplemental Documents\08902_D3-1 Pond-1 D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08902\Supplemental Documents\08902_D3-1 Pond-2 D-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08902\Supplemental Documents\08902_Submittal Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.