alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.5

GRAPHIC

---

| |  | PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered AccountantsPO Box 82
Royal Trust Tower, Suite 3000
Toronto Dominion Centre
Toronto, Ontario
Canada M5K 1G8
Telephone +1 416 863 1133
Facsimile +1 416 365 8215
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consent of Independent Auditors

We
hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Alliance Atlantis Communications Inc. ("Company") of our auditors' report dated March 28, 2005 relating to
the consolidated financial statements. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Company's registration statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-13284 and 333-9586) of our auditors' report dated March 28, 2005 on
the Company's financial statements included in the 2004 Annual report on Form 40F.

GRAPHIC

March
28, 2005

PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the Canadian firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the other member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International
Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.

---



GRAPHIC

---

| |  | PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered AccountantsPO Box 82
Royal Trust Tower, Suite 3000
Toronto Dominion Centre
Toronto, Ontario
Canada M5K 1G8
Telephone +1 416 863 1133
Facsimile +1 416 365 8215
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consent of Independent Auditors

We
hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Alliance Atlantis Communications Inc. (the "Company") of our auditors' report dated August 10, 2005
relating to the schedule of reconciliation to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and our comments by auditors on Canada-U.S.A. reporting differences dated
March 28, 2005 relating to the consolidated financial statements. We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Company's registration statements on Form S-8 (File
Nos. 333-13284 and 333-9586) of our auditors report dated August 10, 2005 on the Company's schedule of reconciliation to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of
America and our comments by auditors on Canada-USA reporting difference dated August 10, 2005 both of which are included in the 2004 Annual Report on Form 40-F.

GRAPHIC

August
10, 2005

PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the Canadian firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the other member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International
Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.

---



QuickLinks
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1122 

CA 11-00320 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, PERADOTTO, AND LINDLEY, JJ. 

 

COLLEEN O’BRIEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LARRY J. BAINBRIDGE AND FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE 

SYSTEM, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS.

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

 

BURDEN, GULISANO & HICKEY, LLC, BUFFALO (SARAH HANSEN OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS. 

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (JOHN A. COLLINS OF COUNSEL),

FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

 

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie

County (Timothy J. Drury, J.), entered September 14, 2010 in a

personal injury action. The order denied the motion of defendants for

summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied the cross motion

of plaintiff for partial summary judgment on the issue of serious

injury. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as

it denied defendants’ motion is unanimously dismissed and the order is

affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in O’Brien v Bainbridge ([appeal No. 2] ___

AD3d ___ [Nov. 18, 2011]). 

Entered: November 18, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACOCUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors

Northern California Bancorp Inc.

Monterey, California

 

We hereby consent to the use in the 10-K for the Northern California Bancorp Inc. of our report dated April 11, 2011 relating to the financial statements of the Northern California Bancorp Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the three-year period ended December 31, 2009.

 

 
| */s/   Hutchinson and Bloodgood LLP* |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 |   |
| Glendale,   CA                       |   |
| April 11,   2011                |   |

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 164

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 164.023-1 Scope.

This subpart contains performance requirements, acceptance tests, and production testing and inspection requirements for thread used in the construction of personal flotation devices (PFDs) approved under part 160 of this subchapter. Manufacturers must also comply with the requirements of subpart 164.019 of this chapter.
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C SECTION 1350)








The undersigned, as the Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer of Matria Healthcare, Inc., certifies that, to
the best of his knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2007, which accompanies this certification fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Matria Healthcare, Inc. at the dates and for the periods
indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and shall not be
relied upon for any other purpose.





This 29th day of
February 2008.





/s/
Parker H.
Petit


Parker H.
Petit


Chairman
of the Board and


Chief
Executive Officer

















A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Matria Healthcare, Inc. and will be
retained by Matria Healthcare, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.





The information in this Exhibit 32.1
shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be
expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.139-3 Testing, marking, and inspection requirements. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76705 , Sept. 18, 2024.
( a ) Automatic fire dampers that are installed in A-class divisions that are submitted for type approval must be tested for fire resistance under Annex 1, Part 3 of the FTP Code (incorporated by reference, see § 164.139-2). Such devices must also be tested in accordance with Appendix A-II of IMO Resolution A.754(18) (incorporated by reference, see § 164.139-2).
( b ) All testing and inspections required by this subpart must be performed by an independent laboratory accepted by the Coast Guard under subpart 159.010 of this chapter. A list of independent laboratories accepted as meeting subpart 159.010 of this chapter is available online at *http://psix.uscg.mil/EQLabs/Default.aspx .*
( c ) The independent laboratory must perform an initial factory inspection to select the test specimens and establish the materials of construction, chemical make-up, dimensions, tolerances and other related factors needed to confirm product consistency during follow-up production inspections.
( d ) Production inspections must be performed by the independent laboratory in accordance with subpart 159.007 of this chapter at least annually to confirm that no changes have been made to the product that may adversely affect its fire performance as a fire damper.
( e ) The independent laboratory must prepare production inspection procedures and a report of the results of the fire testing program, and shall furnish the manufacturer with three copies of each upon completion of the required testing.
( f ) Materials approved under this subpart must be shipped in packaging that is clearly marked with the name of the manufacturer, product designation, date of manufacture, batch or lot number, and Coast Guard type approval number.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**I, Frank A. D’Amelio, Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of Lucent Technologies Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K ofLucent Technologies Inc. (the “registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: December 14, 2005/s/ Frank A. D’Amelio Executive Vice President and       Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
§ 182.445 Fill and sounding pipes for fuel tanks. ( a ) Fill pipes for fuel tanks must be not less than 40 millimeters (1.5 inches) nominal pipe size.
( b ) There must be a means of accurately determining the amount of fuel in each fuel tank either by sounding, through a separate sounding pipe or a fill pipe, or by an installed marine type fuel gauge.
( c ) Where sounding pipes are used, their openings must be at least as high as the opening of the fill pipe and they must be kept closed at all times except during sounding.
( d ) Fill pipes and sounding pipes must be so arranged that overflow of liquid or vapor cannot escape to the inside of the vessel.
( e ) Fill pipes and sounding pipes must run as directly as possible, preferably in a straight line, from the deck connection to the top of the tank. Such pipes must terminate on the weather deck and must be fitted with shutoff valves, watertight deck plates, or screw caps, suitably marked for identification. Gasoline fill pipes and sounding pipes must extend to within one-half of their diameter from the bottom of the tank. Diesel fill pipes and sounding pipes may terminate at the top of the tank.
( f ) A vessel of not more than 19.8 meters (65 feet), carrying not more than 12 passengers, with a gasoline fuel system built in accordance with ABYC H-24 (incorporated by reference; see 46 CFR 175.600), or 33 CFR 183, subpart J, or with a diesel fuel system built in accordance with ABYC H-33 (incorporated by reference; see 46 CFR 175.600), will be considered as meeting the requirements of this section.
( g ) Where a flexible fill pipe section is necessary, suitable flexible tubing or hose having high resistance to salt water, petroleum oils, heat and vibration, may be used. Such hose must overlap metallic pipe ends at the least 11 ⁄ 2 times the pipe diameter and must be secured at each end by clamps. The flexible section must be accessible and as near the upper end of the fill pipe as practicable. When the flexible section is a nonconductor of electricity, the metallic sections of the fill pipe separated thereby must be joined by a conductor for protection against generation of a static charge when filling with fuel.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 986, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65208, Oct. 31, 2008]
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.106-4 Approval procedures. ( a ) Manufacturers that desire type approval should submit a written notice to the Commandant (CG-ENG-4) describing the product and its intended uses. The Commandant will evaluate this information and notify the manufacturer of the product's suitability for testing. The manufacturer should then contract directly with an accepted independent laboratory to perform the required tests and inspections.
( b ) Upon completion of the required testing and inspections, the manufacturer must submit either a written request for type approval to the Commandant (CG-ENG-4), United States Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, or electronically submit a request to *typeapproval@uscg.mil*. The request must indicate the name and address of the manufacturer, all product designations, and the address of all manufacturing facilities. The request must include a copy of the final fire test report and the production inspection procedures. From the information submitted, the Commandant determines whether or not the product is acceptable for type approval. If the product is determined to be acceptable, a type approval certificate valid for a 5-year period will be issued. If the product is not accepted, the manufacturer will be notified of the reasons why.
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Biofield Corp. (the "Company")
for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Covered Report"), I, Steven Waszak, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify
that:





The
Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





The
information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this certificate as of this 13th day of April
2009.




s/  Steven Waszak
# C_2013225EN.01008303.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/83 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/83

---

Order of the General Court of 14 June 2013 — SRF v Council

(Case T-407/11) (1)

1

2013/C 225/188

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.

1

---
# C_2012217EN.01002401.xml

| 21.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/24

---

Order of the General Court of 4 June 2012 — Eurofer v Commission

(Case T-381/11) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Environment - Directive 2003/87/EC - Free allocation of greenhouse gas emission quotas from 2013 - Commission decision determining the product benchmark to be applied for the calculation of the allocation of emission quotas - Fourth paragraph of Article 263 of the TFEU - Lack of individual concern - Regulatory instrument containing implementation measures - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 217/50

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Europäischer Wirtschaftsverband der Eisen- und Stahlindustrie (Eurofer) ASBL (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Altenschmidt and C. Dittrich, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Wilms, K. Herrmann and K. Mifsud-Bonnici, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission Decision 2011/278/EU of 27 April 2011 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 130, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no need to rule on the application for leave to intervene of Euroalliages. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to rule on the application for leave to intervene of Euroalliages.

| 3. | Europäischer Wirtschaftsverband der Eisen- und Stahlindustrie (Eurofer) ASBL is ordered to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim relief. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Europäischer Wirtschaftsverband der Eisen- und Stahlindustrie (Eurofer) ASBL is ordered to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim relief.

---

(1)  OJ C 269, 10.9.2011.

1

---
#### Horatio F. Averill, *Appellant, v.*George H. Tilden and another, *Respondents*.

Order of reference settled.
# C_2011347EN.01003402.xml

| 26.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/34

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 28 September 2011 — Safa Nicu Sepahan v Council

(Case T-384/11 R)

(Application for interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Application for interim measures - Lack of urgency)

2011/C 347/61

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Safa Nicu Sepahan Co. (Isfahan, Iran) (represented by: A. Bahrami, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented initially by: A. Vitro and R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro, and subsequently by: R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro and I. Gurov, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for interim measures, including suspension of operation of point 19 of Table B of Annex I to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 503/2011 of 23 May 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 136, p. 26), in so far as the list of persons and entities whose funds and economic resources are frozen includes an entity designated under the name of ‘Safa Nicu’.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
Case 1:14-cv-14413-TLL-PTM ECF No. 1, PageID.1 Filed 11/18/14 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:14-cv-14413-TLL-PTM ECF No. 1, PageID.2 Filed 11/18/14 Page 2 of 14
Case 1:14-cv-14413-TLL-PTM ECF No. 1, PageID.3 Filed 11/18/14 Page 3 of 14
Case 1:14-cv-14413-TLL-PTM ECF No. 1, PageID.4 Filed 11/18/14 Page 4 of 14
Case 1:14-cv-14413-TLL-PTM ECF No. 1, PageID.5 Filed 11/18/14 Page 5 of 14
Case 1:14-cv-14413-TLL-PTM ECF No. 1, PageID.6 Filed 11/18/14 Page 6 of 14
Case 1:14-cv-14413-TLL-PTM ECF No. 1, PageID.7 Filed 11/18/14 Page 7 of 14
Case 1:14-cv-14413-TLL-PTM ECF No. 1, PageID.8 Filed 11/18/14 Page 8 of 14
Case 1:14-cv-14413-TLL-PTM ECF No. 1, PageID.9 Filed 11/18/14 Page 9 of 14
Case 1:14-cv-14413-TLL-PTM ECF No. 1, PageID.10 Filed 11/18/14 Page 10 of 14
Case 1:14-cv-14413-TLL-PTM ECF No. 1, PageID.11 Filed 11/18/14 Page 11 of 14
Case 1:14-cv-14413-TLL-PTM ECF No. 1, PageID.12 Filed 11/18/14 Page 12 of 14
Case 1:14-cv-14413-TLL-PTM ECF No. 1, PageID.13 Filed 11/18/14 Page 13 of 14
Case 1:14-cv-14413-TLL-PTM ECF No. 1, PageID.14 Filed 11/18/14 Page 14 of 14