alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.077-25 Manufacturer records. ( a ) Each manufacturer of hybrid PFD's must keep the records required by § 159.007-13 of this chapter, except that they must be retained at least 120 months after the month in which the inspection or test was conducted.
( b ) Each record required by § 159.007-13 of this chapter must also include the following information: ( 1 ) For each test, the serial number of the test instrument used if there is more than one available.
( 2 ) For each test and inspection, the identification of the samples used, the lot number, the approval number, and the number of PFD's in the lot.
( 3 ) For each lot rejected, the cause for rejection, any corrective action taken, and the final disposition of the lot.
( c ) The description or photographs of procedures and apparatus used in testing is not required for the records prescribed in § 159.077-13 of this chapter as long as the manufacturer's procedures and apparatus meet the requirements of this subpart.
( d ) Each manufacturer of hybrid PFD's must also keep the following records: ( 1 ) Records for all materials used in production including the following: ( i ) Name and address of the supplier.
( ii ) Date of purchase and receipt.
( iii ) Lot number.
( iv ) Certification meeting § 160.077-11(a)(4).
( 2 ) A copy of this subpart.
( 3 ) Each document incorporated by reference in § 160.077-9.
( 4 ) A copy of the approved plans and specifications.
( 5 ) The approval certificate.
( 6 ) Calibration of test equipment, including the identity of the agency performing the calibration, date of calibration, and results.
( e ) The records required by paragraph (d)(1) of this section must be kept for at least 120 months after preparation. All other records required by paragraph (d) of this section must be kept for at least 60 months.
Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 50 FR 33935, Aug. 22, 1985, § 160.077-25(a) and (e) were added. These paragraphs contain information collection and recordkeeping requirements that will not become effective until approval has been given by the Office of Management and Budget.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Section1350 Certification**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer ofNextera Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i)  theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterlyperiod ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii)  theinformation contained in the Report fairly represents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  November 14, 2007 |                            |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                     | By:  /s/ Antonio Rodriquez |   |
|                     | Chief  Financial Officer        |
|                     | (Principal  Financial Officer)  |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelyto accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not beingfiled for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of theCompany, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0001007020
<NAME> INTEGRATED SYSTEMS CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,286
<SECURITIES>                                     1,743
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,680
<ALLOWANCES>                                       282
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,399
<PP&E>                                           5,829
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,348
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,297
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,405
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,451
<SALES>                                         30,576
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,576
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,045
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,699
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,346
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,346
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 162
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 162.039-6 Examinations, tests, and inspections. ( a ) Full examinations, tests, and inspections to determine the suitability of a product for listing and labeling, and to determine conformance of labeled product to the applicable requirements are conducted by the recognized laboratory. Whenever any work is being done on components or the assembly of such product, the manufacturer shall notify the recognized laboratory in order that an inspector may be assigned to the factory to conduct such examinations, inspections, and tests as to satisfy himself that the quality assurance program of the manufacturer is satisfactory, and that the labeled product is in conformance with the applicable requirements.
( b ) Manufacturers of listed or labeled marine type semiportable fire extinguishers shall maintain quality control of the materials used, manufacturing methods, and the finished product so as to meet the applicable requirements, and shall make sufficient inspections and tests of representative samples of the extinguishers and various components produced to maintain the quality of the finished product. Records of tests conducted by the manufacturer shall be made available to the laboratory inspector or to the Coast Guard marine inspector, or both, for review upon request.
( c ) Followup check tests, examinations, and inspections of product listed and labeled as a “marine type” semiportable fire extinguisher acceptable to the Commandant as approved for use on merchant vessels and motorboats may be conducted by the Coast Guard, as well as by the recognized laboratory.
( d ) The laboratory inspector, or the Coast Guard merchant marine inspector assigned by the Commander of the District in which the factory is located, or both, shall be admitted to any place in the factory where work is being done on listed or labeled product, and either or both inspectors may take samples of parts or materials entering into construction, of final assemblies, for further examinations, inspections, or tests. The manufacturer shall provide a suitable place and the apparatus necessary for the performance of the tests which are done at the place of manufacture.
§ 112.43-1 Switches. An emergency lighting system must not have a switch, except: ( a ) In a distribution panel;
( b ) As required in § 112.43-7; or
( c ) In a circuit that serves a hazardous space such as a paint room or cargo handling room if the switch is located outside of the hazardous location.
[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15267, Apr. 8, 1982, as amended by CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28287, June 4, 1996]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the "Form
10-QSB") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").

      I, Jose' A. Infante, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Issuer, certify that:

      (i)   the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
            U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      (ii)  the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

Dated: May 16, 2005

                                         /s/ Jose' A. Infante
                                         --------------------
                                         Jose' A. Infante
                                         Chairman, President and Chief Executive
                                         Officer
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-216 

________________________________________________________________________ 

EDUCATION 

 Memorandum of Understanding 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and INDONESIA 

Signed at Jakarta February 16, 2009 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 INDONESIA 

 Education 

Memorandum of understanding signed 

 at Jakarta February 16, 2009; 

 Entered into force February 16, 2009.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          90,184
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  278,724
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               384,738
<PP&E>                                         272,047
<DEPRECIATION>                                 103,724
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 570,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          397,113
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,562
<OTHER-SE>                                     171,133
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   570,808
<SALES>                                        286,301
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               286,301
<CGS>                                          168,270
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  168,270
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,160,774
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,679
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,048,113)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                     (26,824)
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,074,937)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
Joe tEatou -:Mayor 

£ao/aife Snields - City Cferl{_ 

(J)aflie{rfuc~r- }lttomey 

qeorge o/ia - City Judge 

April30, 2012 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

City of (}JooneviCU 

203 !Nortft 'Main Street 

moonevi{fe, 'Mississippi 38829 

a:fto11e (662) 728-6810 

Pax_(662) 728-0319 

Chief, EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

Office of Aviation 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Tupelo Regional Airpm1 (TUP) 

Docket DOT-OST-2009-0305 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

(f)avitf <Bofen -fPro cfem 

'}{aroftff£aton -}lftferma11 

9darft:McCoy -}lldenuall 

Wilda <Pound's -jlfd'erman 

Jeff1ttJi{{iams- }lfd'enuatt 

I am writing in supp011 of Silver Aitways' proposal to pl'Ovide commercial air service to the 

Tupelo Regional Airp011. Citizens from Booneville depend on the Tupelo Regional Airport for 

their air service. It is very important to our local economy for air service to continue in and out 

of Tupelo. We believe Silver Airways' interline ticketing and baggage agreements with Delta 

Airlines make this option very attractive to om· citizens. In addition the 30 to 50 seat aircraft are 

much more desirable than the 8 seat aircraft offered by Air Choice One. We are excited about 

this chance to return to profitability. Thank you for considering our citizens in your 

deliberations. 

or Joe Eaton 

ty of Booneville
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                      15,483,440
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  666,359
<ALLOWANCES>                                    69,543
<INVENTORY>                                  5,016,372
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,309,349
<PP&E>                                       3,979,711
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,686,478
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,445,497
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       104,160
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,601,048
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,686,478
<SALES>                                      6,338,685
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,286,418
<CGS>                                        4,362,640
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,863,503
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               761,968
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (170,021)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                830,968
<INCOME-TAX>                                   331,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   499,168
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05


</TABLE>
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 17-11784

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 0:13-cv-62260-JIC

NORMA OLMO, 

NELSON OLMO, 

 Plaintiffs-Appellants,

 versus

DAVOL, INC., 

C.R. BARD, INC., 

 Defendants-Appellees.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(February 7, 2018)

Before MARCUS, ANDERSON, and HULL, Circuit Judges.

Case: 17-11784 Date Filed: 02/07/2018 Page: 1 of 2 
2

PER CURIAM: 

We have had the benefit of oral argument and have carefully reviewed the 

briefs and the summary judgment record in this case. The learned intermediary 

doctrine provides that the manufacturer’s duty to warn runs to the physician, not 

directly to the patient. If the physician had independent knowledge of the risk that 

caused the plaintiff’s injuries – substantially the same knowledge as an adequate 

warning should have communicated – then the plaintiff cannot prevail on a failureto-warn claim. Christopher v. Cutter Laboratories, 53 F.3d 1184, 1192 (11th Cir. 

1995). We agree with the district court that the physician who implanted the 

instant patch had such independent knowledge. With respect to the patch that was 

implanted in plaintiff, there is insufficient evidence that the ring in the patch 

buckled.

For the foregoing reasons, including reasons fully explained at oral 

argument, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Case: 17-11784 Date Filed: 02/07/2018 Page: 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.133-17 Marking and labeling. ( a ) Each hook body of a release mechanism must be marked with a plate or label permanently affixed in a conspicuous place readily accessible for inspection and sufficiently durable to withstand continuous exposure to environmental conditions at sea for the life of the release mechanism.
( b ) The plate or label must be in English, but may also be in other languages.
( c ) The plate or label must contain the— ( 1 ) Manufacturer's name and model identification;
( 2 ) Name of the independent laboratory that witnessed the prototype or production tests;
( 3 ) Serial number of the release mechanism;
( 4 ) U.S. Coast Guard approval number;
( 5 ) Month and year of manufacture;
( 6 ) Safe working load of the release mechanism; and
( 7 ) Word “SOLAS.”
## United States Court of App eals F O R T H E E I G H T H

C I R C U I T

__ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 1- 27 31

__ __ __ __ __ _ Ri ck ey Geor ge , * * App el la nt , * * App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s v. * Dis tri ctCo ur t fo r th e * East ern Dis tri ctof Ark an sa s. Dav idMi ll er; Tam

m y San de rs ; Arc hi e * W es tm or el an d; Does , all co un ty * [UNPUBLISHED] em pl oyees t ha t s ig ne d a ffi da vi ts ag ai ns t * pl ai nt iff Ric ke y Geor ge , * * App el le es . *

__ __ __ __ __ _ Subm it te d: Marc h 9 , 20 12 Fi le d: Marc h 1 4, 2 01 2

__ __ __ __ __ _ Befo re LOKEN, BOW MAN, an d B ENTON, Ci rcu itJu dg es .

__ __ __ __ __ _ PER CURI AM. Ri ck ey Geo rg e ap pe al s fro m th e or de r of th e Dis tri ct Co ur t di sm is si ng hi s pr o 1 se co m pl ai nt
. Afte r care fu l de no vo rev ie w, se e Mo or e v. Si m s, 20 0 F.3 d 11 70 , 11 71 (8 th Ci r. 20 00 ) (p er cu ria m ), we affi rm f o r t h e r eas on s st at ed by t he Dis tri ct Co urt. See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ The Hon or ab le Su sa n W eb be r Wri g h t , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e 1 East ern Dis tri ctof Ark an sa s.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.170-23 Procedure for approval of design, material, or construction change. ( a ) Each change in design, material, or construction from the plans approved under 46 CFR 159.005-13 and § 160.170-13(h) of this subpart must be approved by the Commandant before being used in any production release mechanism. The manufacturer must submit any such change following the procedures in § 160.170-9 of this subpart, but documentation on items that are unchanged from the plans approved under 46 CFR 159.005-13 and § 160.170-13(h) of this subpart need not be resubmitted.
( b ) Unless determined by the Commandant to be unnecessary, a prototype release mechanism with each change described in paragraph (a) of this section must be made and tested according to the procedures for new approvals in §§ 160.170-9 through 160.170-13 of this subpart.
( c ) Determinations of equivalence of design, construction, and materials will be made by the Commandant only.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.021-3 Materials, workmanship, construction and performance requirements. ( a ) *Materials.* The materials shall conform strictly to the specifications and drawings submitted by the manufacturer and approved by the Commandant. The color of the tube shall be red. Flare compositions containing sulphur shall not contain more than 2.6 percent of potassium chlorate or an equivalent amount of any other chlorate. Flare compositions containing chlorates in any quantity shall not contain any ammonium salts.
( b ) *Workmanship.* Hand red flare distress signals shall be of first class workmanship and shall be free from imperfections of manufacture affecting their appearance or that may affect their serviceability. Moistureproof coatings shall be applied uniformly and shall be free from pinholes or other visible defects which would impair their usefulness.
( c ) *Construction.* The casing shall be fitted and secured to the handle with not less than a 25 mm (1 in.) overlap and shall be attached to the handle in such a manner that failure of the joint will not occur during tests, ignition, or operation. The plug shall be securely affixed in the casing to separate the flare composition from the wooden handle. The flare composition shall be thoroughly mixed and be uniformly compressed throughout to preclude variations of density which may adversely affect uniformity of its burning characteristics. The cap shall have a lap fit of not less than 25 mm (1 in.) over the end of the casing and flare composition to entirely and securely protect the exposed surface of the igniter button and end of flare composition and casing, and shall have an inner shoulder so constructed that it is mechanically impossible for the inner surface of the cap to come in contact with the igniter button. The cap shall be securely attached to the casing in such manner as to preclude its accidental detachment. The cap shall be provided on its top with a friction striking material which shall, by a pull of the tear strip, be entirely exposed for striking the friction igniter button. The igniter button shall be non-water soluble or be protected from moisture by a coating of some waterproof substance, and shall be raised or exposed in such manner as to provide positive ignition by the friction striker. The igniter button shall be firmly secured in or on the top of the flare composition; the arrangement shall be such that the ignition will be transmitted to the flare composition. The assembled flare, consisting of tear strip, cap, casing, and handle, shall be sealed and treated to protect the flare from deterioration by moisture. The protective waterproof coating shall be applied so none adheres to the friction striking surface. Special consideration will be given to alternate waterproofing of the signal by means of a water-resistant coating on the signal plus packaging in a sealed plastic waterproof bag satisfactory to the Commandant.
( d ) *Performance.* Signals shall meet all the inspection and test requirements contained in § 160.021-4.