alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 171.106 Wells in double bottoms. ( a ) This section applies to each vessel that has a well installed in a double bottom required by § 171.105.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section— ( 1 ) The depth of a well must be at least 18 inches (45.7 cm) less than the depth of the double bottom at the centerline; and
( 2 ) The well may not extend below the horizontal plane C illustrated in Figure 171.105.
( c ) A well may extend to the outer bottom of a double bottom at the after end of a shaft tunnel.
§ 139.135 Addition and removal of auditors and surveyors. ( a ) A TPO must maintain a list of current and former auditors and surveyors.
( b ) To add an auditor or surveyor, the TPO must submit that person's experience, background, and qualifications to the TVNCOE.
( c ) The TVNCOE must be notified when an auditor or surveyor is removed from employment.
###### Editorial Note on Part 160

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 160.151-51 Notice of approval.

If the cognizant OCMI determines that the servicing facility meets the applicable requirements of §§ 160.151-39 through 160.151-47, the OCMI notifies the facility that it is approved and notifies the Commandant. The Commandant issues an approval letter to the servicing facility with copies to the OCMI and to the manufacturer(s) whose liferafts the facility is approved to service. The letter will specify any limits on the approval, and will assign the facility's approval code for use on the inspection sticker required by § 160.151-57(m)(3). The Commandant will maintain a current list of approved facilities.
Order entered September 12, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 22
- 00859
- CV
DELORIS PHILLIPS , Appellant

V. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE DIVISION OF WORKERS

COMP ENSATION, ET AL , Appellee s On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 21
- 06299

O RDER Before the Court is court reporter Terri Etekochay’s September 8, 2022 request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record

. Because the deadline for filing the record has been suspended pending the Court’s determination of its jurisdiction over this appeal, we DENY the motion as premature . The Court will set a new deadline for the record should the Court de termine it has jurisdiction over the appeal.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 67 (Monday, April 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 17522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1740]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Board of Visitors, United States Military Academy (USMA)

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The notice of an open meeting scheduled for April 25, 2007 
published in the Federal Register on March 13, 2007 (72 FR 11337) has a 
new meeting location. The meeting will now be held in Room B318, 
Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Colonel Shaun T. Wurzbach, 
United States Military Academy, West Point, NY 10996-5000, (845) 938-
4200.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-1740 Filed 4-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.141-4 Approval procedures. ( a ) Manufacturers that desire type approval should submit a written notice to the Commandant (CG-ENG-4) describing the product and its intended uses. The Commandant will evaluate this information and notify the manufacturer of the product's suitability for testing. The manufacturer should then contract directly with an accepted independent laboratory to perform the required tests and inspections.
( b ) Upon completion of the required testing and inspections, the manufacturer must submit either a written request for type approval to the Commandant (CG-ENG-4), United States Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, or electronically submit a request to *typeapproval@uscg.mil .* The request must indicate the name and address of the manufacturer, all product designations, and the address of all manufacturing facilities. The request must include a copy of the final fire test report and the production inspection procedures. From the information submitted, the Commandant determines whether or not the product is acceptable for type approval. If the product is determined to be acceptable, a type approval certificate valid for a 5-year period will be issued. If the product is not accepted, the manufacturer will be notified of the reasons why.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

August 28, 2024

No. 04

- 24

- 00378

- CV

Karen GAFFORD

, Appellant

v.

Elizabeth BLISS

- GAFFORD

, Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2023

- CI

- 12948 Honorable Angelica Jimenez , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. We order appellant to pay the costs of this appeal.

It is so ORDERED on August 28, 2024

.

_____________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 28th day of August, 2024

.

_____________________________ Luz Estrada , Chief Deputy Clerk
# C_2013336EN.01002203.xml

| 16.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/22

---

Order of the General Court of 11 September 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-475/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Civil Service - Reimbursement of recoverable expenses - Lack of interest in bringing proceedings - Appeal manifestly inadmissible)

2013/C 336/46

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, Agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 20 June 2011 in Case F-67/10 Marcuccio v Commission ECR-SC I-A-0000 and II-0000, seeking to have that order set aside.

Marcuccio

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Luigi Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Luigi Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 22.10.2011.

1

---
§ 73.735-709 Annual reporting of outside activities. By September 10 of each year the approving official shall require a report from each person for whom outside work has been approved during the past year. The report shall show: ( a ) For the 12 months just past (ending August 31): ( 1 ) Whether the anticipated work was actually performed for the person or organization named in the request for approval;
( 2 ) Actual amount of time spent on the activity.
( b ) For the forthcoming 12 months (ending August 31): ( 1 ) Whether it is anticipated that the outside work will continue;
( 2 ) Whether any change is anticipated with respect to information supplied in accordance with the original request on which approval was based.
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.112-2 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this subpart with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material is available for inspection at the U.S. Coast Guard, Office of Design and Engineering Standards (CG-ENG), 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, and is available from the sources listed below. It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html*.
( b ) International Maritime Organization (IMO) Publishing, 4 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR, United Kingdom, +44 (0)20 7735 7611, *http://www.imo.org*. ( 1 ) 2010 FTP Code, International Code for Application of Fire Test Procedures, 2010 (Resolution MSC.307(88)), 2012 Edition (“FTP Code”), IBR approved for § 164.112-3(a).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Robert Crosson

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 14-13607

Commissioner of Social Honorable Sean F. Cox

Security,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING 

2/16/16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

Plaintiff filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging a final decision of the

Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for disabled child’s insurance benefits

under the Social Security Act. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Stafford

for determination of all non-dispositive motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Report

and Recommendation pursuant to § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). Thereafter, the parties filed motions

for summary judgment.

On February 16, 2016, Magistrate Judge Stafford issued a Report and Recommendation

(“R&R”) (Docket Entry No. 17) wherein she recommends that: 1) the Commissioner’s motion

be DENIED; 2) Plaintiff’s motion be GRANTED; and 3) the Commissioner’s decision be

REVERSED and REMANDED for an award of benefits pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §

405(g).

Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), a party objecting to the recommended disposition of a

1

2:14-cv-13607-SFC-EAS Doc # 18 Filed 03/07/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 615
matter by a Magistrate Judge must filed objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after

being served with a copy of the R&R. “The district judge to whom the case is assigned shall

make a de novo determination upon the record, or after additional evidence, of any portion of the

magistrate judge’s disposition to which specific written objection has been made.” Id. 

The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired and the docket reflects that neither

party has filed objections to the R&R. The Court hereby ADOPTS the February 16, 2016 R&R. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: 1) the Commissioner’s motion is DENIED; 2)

Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED; and 3) the Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED and

REMANDED for an award of benefits pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

S/Sean F. Cox 

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge

Dated: March 7, 2016

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on

March 7, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Jennifer McCoy 

Case Manager

2

2:14-cv-13607-SFC-EAS Doc # 18 Filed 03/07/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 616
<PAGE>   1
                                    EXHIBIT 11
                  STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               12/31/98 to
    Return on Equity and Assets               Annualized         6/30/99
                                             -------------   ----------------

<S>                                                <C>       <C>
    Return on average total assets                  (7.77)%            (3.88)%
    Return on average equity                       (23.45)            (11.73)
    Dividend payout ratio                                                N/A
    Average equity to average assets                                   33.12

    Statement of Per Share Earnings

    Net Loss                                                  $   (1,118,590)
                                                              ===============

    Average shares outstanding                                     1,162,265

    Basic and diluted loss per share                          $        (0.96)
                                                              ---------------
</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59783, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 148.145 Stowage and segregation for materials of Class 7. ( a ) Class 7 material listed in Table 148.10 of this part must be stowed— ( 1 ) Separate from foodstuffs; and
( 2 ) In a hold or barge closed or covered to prevent dispersal of the material during transportation.
( b ) [Reserved]
# C_2011211EN.01003301.xml

| 16.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/33

---

Action brought on 4 April 2011 — ZZ v European Parliament

(Case F-35/11)

2011/C 211/67

Language of the case: Slovak

Parties

Parties

Applicant(s): ZZ (represented by: J. Rybánsky, lawyer)

Applicant(s):

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the defendant to grant the applicant only half of the installation allowance to which he should be entitled.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the European Parliament (Individual Entitlements Unit) of 28 May 2010 on the grant of the installation allowance to the applicant in so far as it fixes the installation allowance at only one month’s basic salary and does not grant an installation allowance of two months’ basic salary; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the European Parliament (Individual Entitlements Unit) of 28 May 2010 on the grant of the installation allowance to the applicant in so far as it fixes the installation allowance at only one month’s basic salary and does not grant an installation allowance of two months’ basic salary;

| — | Annul the decision of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament of 6 January 2011 which rejects the complaint lodged by the applicant under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament of 6 January 2011 which rejects the complaint lodged by the applicant under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union;

| — | Order the Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Parliament to pay the costs.

---
#### § 113.10-7 Connection boxes.

Each connection box must be constructed in accordance with Type 4 or 4X of NEMA 250 or IP 56 of IEC 60529:2013 (both incorporated by reference; see 46 CFR 110.10-1) requirements.

[USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65201, Oct. 31, 2008; USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16369, Mar. 16, 2023]
2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 1 of 26    Pg ID 1

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 2 of 26    Pg ID 2

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 3 of 26    Pg ID 3

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 4 of 26    Pg ID 4

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 5 of 26    Pg ID 5

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 6 of 26    Pg ID 6

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 7 of 26    Pg ID 7

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 8 of 26    Pg ID 8

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 9 of 26    Pg ID 9

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 10 of 26    Pg ID 10

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 11 of 26    Pg ID 11

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 12 of 26    Pg ID 12

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 13 of 26    Pg ID 13

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 14 of 26    Pg ID 14

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 15 of 26    Pg ID 15

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 16 of 26    Pg ID 16

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 17 of 26    Pg ID 17

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 18 of 26    Pg ID 18

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 19 of 26    Pg ID 19

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 20 of 26    Pg ID 20

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 21 of 26    Pg ID 21

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 22 of 26    Pg ID 22

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 23 of 26    Pg ID 23

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 24 of 26    Pg ID 24

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 25 of 26    Pg ID 25

2:14-cv-13833-GCS-MJH   Doc # 1   Filed 10/03/14   Pg 26 of 26    Pg ID 26
# AVA NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Coastal Management Beverly Eaves Perdue Governor

James D. Giattina, Director Water Protection Division, Region 4 

### Braxton C. Davis Director February 24, 2012

Unites States Environmental Protection Agency AtlantaFederal Center 61 Forsyth Street Atlanta, GA 30303-8960 Dee Freeman 

### Secretary

SUBJECT: 

### CD12-016- Consistency Concurrence Concerning the Proposed Issuance ofTwo NPDES General Permits, North Carolina (DCM#20110188)
Dear Mr. Giattina: We received your consistency submission on December 14, 2011 concerning the proposed issuance bythe EPA oftwo NPDES General Permits for discharges incidental to the normal operation ofvessels, offshore, North Carolina. The deadline for completing the consistency review was extended, bymutual consent, to February 27, 2012. North Carolina's coastal zone management program consists of, but is not limitedto, the Coastal AreaManagement Act, the State's Dredge and Fill Law, Chapter 7 ofTitle 15A oftheNorth CarolinaAdministrative Code, and the land use plan ofthe County and/or local municipality in which the proposedproject is located. Itis the objective ofthe Division ofCoastal Management (DCM) to manage the State's coastal resources to ensure thatproposed Federal activities would be compatible with safeguarding and perpetuating the biological, social, economic, and aesthetic values ofthe State's coastal waters. To solicitpublic comments, DCM circulated a description ofthe proposed actionto State agencies that would have a regulatory interest. No comments asserting that the proposed activity would be inconsistent withthe State's coastal managementprogram were received. DCMhas reviewed the submitted informationpursuantto the management objectives and enforceable policies ofSubchapters 7H and 7M ofChapter 7 ofTitle 15A oftheNorth Carolina Administrative Code and concurs thatthe proposed Federal activity is consistent, to the

400 Commerce Ave., Morehead City, NC 28557-3421 Phone: 252-808-2808\ FAX: 252-247-3330 Internet: www.nccoastalmanaaement.net 

## OnehC 

## 1. Nort aro tna 

# )Vaturallg An Equal Opportunity IAffirmative Action Employermaximum extent practicable, withthe relevant enforceable policies ofNorth Carolina's coastal management program. Should the proposed action be modified, a revised consistency determination could be necessary. This might take the form ofeither a supplemental consistency determinationpursuantto 15 CFR 930.46, or a new consistency determination pursuant to 15 CFR930.36. Likewise, if further project assessments reveal environmental effects not previously considered by the proposed development, a supplemental consistency certification may be required. Ifyouhave any questions, please contact Stephen Rynas at 252-808-2808 x209. Thank you for your consideration ofthe North Carolina Coastal Management Program.
Sincerely,



# :f57#~ Doug Huggett Manager, Major Permits and Consistency Unit

Cc: JeffPoupart, NC Division ofWater Quality Marshall Hyatt, US Environmental Protection Agency

Page: 2
§ 167.25-1 Boilers, pressure vessels, piping and appurtenances. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided by law or regulations in this subpart, all vessels constructed or reconverted to use as nautical school ships on or after July 1, 1951, shall conform with one of the following standards for boilers, pressure vessels, piping and appurtenances: ( 1 ) Marine engineering regulations in parts 50 to 63, inclusive, of Subchapter F (Marine Engineering) of this chapter.
( 2 ) Navy Standard Construction Specifications in effect at time of construction or conversion.
( 3 ) U.S. Coast Guard Standard Construction Specifications in effect at time of construction or conversion.
( b ) The boilers, pressure vessels, and appurtenances shall be inspected initially under the provisions of part 52 of Subchapter F (Marine Engineering) of this chapter. All alterations, replacements or repairs on nautical school ships shall conform to the applicable standards in paragraph (a) of this section insofar as practicable.
[CGFR 51-11, 16 FR 3218, Apr. 12, 1951, as amended by CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18908, Dec. 18, 1968]
Case 2:02-cv-71871-NGE Document 256 Filed 07/19/04 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-71871-NGE Document 256 Filed 07/19/04 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-71871-NGE Document 256 Filed 07/19/04 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-71871-NGE Document 256 Filed 07/19/04 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-71871-NGE Document 256 Filed 07/19/04 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-71871-NGE Document 256 Filed 07/19/04 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-71871-NGE Document 256 Filed 07/19/04 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-71871-NGE Document 256 Filed 07/19/04 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-71871-NGE Document 256 Filed 07/19/04 Page 9 of 9
§ 142.205 Alternate standards. ( a ) Towing vessels in compliance with Chapter II-2 of SOLAS (incorporated by reference, see § 136.112 of this subchapter) will be deemed to be in compliance with this part.
( b ) Towing vessels that comply with other alternate standards, deemed by the Commandant to provide an equivalent level of safety and performance, will be in compliance with this part.
# C_2015026EN.01004501.xml

| 26.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/45

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 2 December 2014 — Erik Simpson v Council

(Case F-142/11 DEP) (1)

1

((Civil service - Procedure - Taxation of costs))

(2015/C 026/58)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Erik Simpson (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and A.F. Jensen, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Civil service — Application for annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 9 after he had passed Open Competition EPSO/AD/113/07 ‘Heads of Unit (AD 9) in the field of translation who have Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovak and Slovene as their main language’ and an application for compensation.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The total amount of costs to be reimbursed by the Council of the European Union to Mr Simpson by way of recoverable costs in Case F-142/11 is fixed in the amount of EUR 8  600, to be increased by any value added tax due on that amount.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 3.3.2012, p. 26.

1

---
§ 159.007-1 Purpose. ( a ) This subpart contains the procedures under which production inspections and tests of approved equipment or materials are to be performed under this subchapter.
( b ) [Reserved]