alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015155EN.01002201.xml

| 11.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 March 2015 — Belgium v Commission

(Case T-538/11) (1)

1

((State aid - Public health - Aid granted to finance screening tests for transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE) in bovine animals - Decision declaring aid to be partly compatible and partly incompatible with the internal market - Action for annulment - Adversely affecting act - Admissibility - Notion of advantage - Notion of selectivity))

(2015/C 155/24)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: C. Pochet and J.-C. Halleux, acting as Agents, assisted by L. Van den Hende, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by H. van Vliet and S. Thomas, and subsequently by H. van Vliet and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2011/678/EU of 27 July 2011 concerning the State aid for financing screening of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE) in bovine animals implemented by Belgium (State aid C 44/08 (ex NN 45/04)) (OJ 2011 L 274, p. 36).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 26.11.2011.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32



     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I,  Carey  G.  Birmingham,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly  Report  of  International  Test  Systems, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the
fiscal  quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934 and that
information  contained  in  such  Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of International Test
Systems,  Inc.

 Date: September 8, 2006

                                     By: /s/ Carey G. Birmingham
                                     ---------------------------
                                     Carey G. Birmingham,
                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                     Principal Accounting Officer

<PAGE>
Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for 

the Oil and Gas Extraction Point Source Category 

DATABASE REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2014-0598

DCN: SGE01184.A15 

Attachment file will be sent on CD.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DONALD BETHEA,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 22 EM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of April, 2017, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
# C_2012200EN.01001601.xml

| 7.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Sport Eybl & Sports Experts v OHIM — Seven (SEVEN SUMMITS)

(Case T-179/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark SEVEN SUMMITS - Earlier Community figurative mark Seven - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 200/32

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sport Eybl & Sports Experts GmbH (Wels, Austria) (represented by: S. Fürst, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Seven SpA (Leinì, Italy) (represented by: D. Sindico, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 January 2011 (Case R 364/2010-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Seven SpA and Sport Eybl & Sports Experts GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Sport Eybl & Sports Experts GmbH to pay its own costs and to bear those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and by Seven SpA. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Sport Eybl & Sports Experts GmbH to pay its own costs and to bear those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and by Seven SpA.

---

(1)  OJ C 152, 21.5.2011.

1

---
# C_2011232EN.01002101.xml

| 6.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/21

---

Action brought on 9 June 2011 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-293/11)

(2011/C 232/33)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafillou and C. Soulay)

Defendant: Hellenic Republic

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by applying the special VAT scheme for travel agents in cases where the travel services have been sold to a person other than the traveller, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 306 to 310 of Directive 2006/112/EC; (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by applying the special VAT scheme for travel agents in cases where the travel services have been sold to a person other than the traveller, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 306 to 310 of Directive 2006/112/EC; (1)

| — | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The scheme for travel agents applies only to services which are supplied directly to travellers, in accordance with the directive’s wording in most languages. Even the English version, which uses, at one point only, the term ‘customer’, would not make sense unless it related solely to travellers. The same conclusion results from a combined reading of all the relevant provisions (systemic argument). A historic interpretation also supports the same conclusion, since the VAT directive merely codified the Sixth Directive, without altering its content. So far as concerns a teleological interpretation, what is important is that double taxation of agents in certain Member States not be allowed (by the exclusion of deductions in the event of extended application of the scheme for travel agents). Any shortcoming of the directive cannot be corrected by individual States without its text being officially amended.

---

(1)  OJ L 347, 11.12.2006.

---
# C_2012032EN.01001303.xml

| 4.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/13

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf (Germany), lodged on 16 November 2011 — Novartis AG v Actavis Deutschland GmbH & Co KG, Actavis Ltd.

(Case C-574/11)

2012/C 32/24

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Novartis AG

Applicant:

Defendants: Actavis Deutschland GmbH & Co KG, Actavis Ltd.

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Are Articles 4 and 5 of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that the protection conferred by a supplementary protection certificate, which has been granted for a single active ingredient (in this case, Valsartan), extends to a form which contains a combination of active ingredients featuring that single active ingredient (in this case, Valsartan + Hydrochlorothiazide)?

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (Codified version), OJ 2009 L 152, p. 1.

1

---
§ 90.14 Exceptions to the rules against age discrimination. Normal operation or statutory objective of any program or activity. A recipient is permitted to take an action, otherwise prohibited by § 90.12, if the action reasonably takes into account age as a factor necessary to the normal operation or the achievement of any statutory objective of a program or activity. An action reasonably takes into account age as a factor necessary to the normal operation or the achievement of any statutory objective of a program or activity, if: ( a ) Age is used as a measure or approximation of one or more other characteristics; and
( b ) The other characteristic(s) must be measured or approximated in order for the normal operation of the program or activity to continue, or to achieve any statutory objective of the program or activity; and
( c ) The other characteristic(s) can be reasonably measured or approximated by the use of age; and
( d ) The other characteristic(s) are impractical to measure directly on an individual basis.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

DARRELL REESE,

Petitioner

v.

THE PROTHONOTARY OF THE PA.

SUPREME COURT,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 84 EM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20 th day of October , 2022, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and the Application for an

Immediate Hearing are DENIED.
# C_2008256EN.01001001.xml

| 9.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/10

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid for employment

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 256/05)

| Aid No | XE 35/08 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Poland |
| Region | Świętokrzyskie |
| Title of aid scheme | Uchwała nr IX/10/07 Rady Miejskiej w Starachowicach z dnia 16 lipca 2007 r. w sprawie przyjęcia „Programu Pomocy Przedsiębiorcom Na Zatrudnienie” |
| Legal basis | Art. 18 ust. 2 pkt 8, art. 40 ust.1, art. 41 ust. 1 oraz art. 42 ustawy z dn. 8 marca 1990 r. o samorządzie gminnym (tekst jednolity: Dz.U. z 2001 r. nr 142 poz. 1591 ze zm.), art. 7 ust. 3 ustawy z dn. 12 stycznia 1991 r. o podatkach i opłatach lokalnych (tekst jednolity: Dz.U. z 2006 r. nr 121 poz. 844 ze zm.) |
| Budget | Annual budget: EUR 0,16 million
  Overall budget: — |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Articles 4(2)-(5), 5 and 6 of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 23.10.2007 |
| Duration | 30.6.2008 |
| Objective | Art. 4: Creation of employment |
| Economic sectors | All Community sectors (1) eligible for employment aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Prezydent Miasta Starachowice |
| ul. Radomska 45 |
| PL-27-200 Starachowice |

Aid No

XE 35/08

Member State

Poland

Region

Świętokrzyskie

Title of aid scheme

Uchwała nr IX/10/07 Rady Miejskiej w Starachowicach z dnia 16 lipca 2007 r. w sprawie przyjęcia „Programu Pomocy Przedsiębiorcom Na Zatrudnienie”

Legal basis

Art. 18 ust. 2 pkt 8, art. 40 ust.1, art. 41 ust. 1 oraz art. 42 ustawy z dn. 8 marca 1990 r. o samorządzie gminnym (tekst jednolity: Dz.U. z 2001 r. nr 142 poz. 1591 ze zm.), art. 7 ust. 3 ustawy z dn. 12 stycznia 1991 r. o podatkach i opłatach lokalnych (tekst jednolity: Dz.U. z 2006 r. nr 121 poz. 844 ze zm.)

Budget

Annual budget: EUR 0,16 million

Overall budget: —

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Articles 4(2)-(5), 5 and 6 of the Regulation

Date of implementation

23.10.2007

Duration

30.6.2008

Objective

Art. 4: Creation of employment

Economic sectors

All Community sectors (1) eligible for employment aid

1

Name and address of the granting authority

Prezydent Miasta Starachowice

ul. Radomska 45

PL-27-200 Starachowice

---

(1)  With the exception of the shipbuilding sector and other sectors subject to special rules in regulations and directives governing all State aid within the sector.

1

---
Exhibit 31.1

  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
                        AS AMENDED AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert S. Herlin, Chief Executive Officer of Natural Gas Systems, Inc.,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Natural Gas Systems,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's Board of
Directors:

      a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



Date: September 27, 2005

/s/   ROBERT S. HERLIN
-----------------------------
      Robert S. Herlin
      Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-30882

Summary Calendar

_____________________

MAC SALES INC., ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

KENNETH P. CHOINA, SR.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH MULE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

E. I. DuPONT de NEMOURS & COMPANY,

Defendant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(89-CV-4571)

_________________________________________________________________

February 7, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Joseph Mule appeals the denial of his motion for permission to

intervene as of right pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 24(a)(2). We

DISMISS the appeal.
- 2 -

I.

The denial of intervention as of right is reviewed de novo.

United States v. Franklin Parish School Bd., 47 F.3d 755, 758 (5th

Cir. 1995). And, an applicant for such intervention pursuant to

Rule 24(a)(2) must satisfy all of the following four requirements:

(1) the applicant must file a timely

application; (2) the applicant must claim an

interest in the subject matter of the action;

(3) the applicant must show that disposition

of the action may impair or impede the

applicant's ability to protect that interest;

and (4) the applicant's interest must not be

adequately represented by existing parties to

the litigation.

Id. at 756.

Mule claimed that he was entitled to intervene because,

pursuant to a contract, he owned a one-third interest in the claim

of the plaintiff, Kenneth P. Choina, Sr., against the defendant, E.

I. DuPont de Nemours & Company. The district court held that,

"[t]o the extent that Mule has a contractual interest in [Choina's]

claim, [Choina's] aggressive prosecution of his claim adequately

protects Mule's interest"; and that Mule's claim against Choina
- 3 -

should be pursued in state court. We agree. 

III.

We have "only provisional jurisdiction to hear an appeal from

the denial of a motion to intervene as of right". United States v.

Franklin Parish School Bd., 47 F.3d at 758. Once we determine

"that the motion to intervene as of right is without merit, the

appropriate remedy is to dismiss for lack of appellate

jurisdiction". Id. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED.
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Central Federal Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
    5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors:
   Dated: October 28, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Mark S. AllioMark S. AllioVice Chairman of the Board, President andChief Executive Officer
 31.
###### Editorial Note on Part 160

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 160.135-1 Scope.

This subpart prescribes standards, tests, and procedures for seeking Coast Guard approval of a lifeboat.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

Denise Nitti 

 Plaintiff, 

 

v. 

Asset Acceptance, LLC 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 2:14-cv-14900-AC-RSW 

 District Judge: Avern Cohn 

Magistrate Judge: R. Steven Whalen 

 

 ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

 This matter having come before the Court on the Stipulation of Dismissal 

with Prejudice submitted by the parties; 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned case is hereby 

dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and fees. 

 s/Avern Cohn 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

DATED: April 21, 2015 

 

 

Case 2:14-cv-14900-AC-RSW ECF No. 13, PageID.44 Filed 04/21/15 Page 1 of 1
#### THE STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION AND PHILIP G. HYER, PLAINTIFFS, v. ISAAC R. STRAGER, DEFENDANT.

Decided November 8, 1929.

Before Gummere, Chief Justice, and Justices Kalisch and Campbell.

Eor the rule, *M. Casewell Heine.'*

*Contra, Harold McDermott.*

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff Hyer, who was an employe of the state highway commission, was run down and injured by an automobile of the defendant while engaged in his work of supervising the construction of the state highway in the town of Eanwood. He brought suit against the defendant to recover compensation for injuries thus received by him. The highway commission joined as a co-plaintiff, claiming that they were entitled to recover from the defendant moneys - that they had been compelled to pay Hyer under the Workmen’s Compensation act. When the case came on to be tried, however, the *999state highway commission submitted to a voluntary nonsuit, and the case proceeded solely upon the claim of Hyer against the defendant. The trial resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, the award to him being $5,000.

The only ground upon which we are asked to make the present rule absolute is that this award is excessive. Our examination of the testimony sent up with the rule leads us to the conclusion, that this contention is without merit, and that the award is a reasonable one.

The rule to show cause will be discharged.
#### § 185.208 Accidents to machinery.

The owner, managing operator, or master shall report damage to a boiler, unfired pressure vessel, or machinery that renders further use of the item unsafe until repairs are made, to the OCMI at the port in which the casualty occurred or nearest the port of first arrival, as soon as practicable after the damage occurs.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE01010

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.