alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 674.7 Exception for serendipitous finds.

A person who makes a serendipitous discovery of a meteorite in Antarctica which could not have been reasonably anticipated, may collect the meteorite for scientific research purposes, provided that the meteorite is collected in the manner most likely to prevent contamination under the circumstances, and provided that the meteorite is otherwise handled, documented and curated in accordance with the requirements of § 674.5.
#### Anne Lavalle, *Appellant, v.*Patrick Skelly, Respondent.

Motion denied.
----

Exhibit 13.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Amendment No. 2 to the annual reportof Birch Mountain Resources Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year endedDecember 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the "Report"), I, John A. Clarke , Vice President, Finance andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

Date: May 29, 2008

|   |   | */s/  John A. Clarke  *                                       |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | **Name: John A. Clarke,**                                                    |
|   |   | Title: Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer    |
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 10418 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

–

Appellee ,

v.
TY ERIC PAGE , Defendant

– Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:12

- CR

- 83

- 1

Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ty Eric Page has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Page h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 16, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-10418 Document: 00512503665 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/16/2014No. 13

- 10418

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-10418 Document: 00512503665 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/16/2014
# C_2015046EN.01004201.xml

| 9.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014 — Austria v Commission

(Case T-251/11) (1)

1

((State aid - Electricity - Aid for energy-intensive businesses - Austrian Green Electricity Act - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Concept of State aid - State resources - State imputability - Selective nature - General Block Exemption Regulation - Misuse of power - Equal treatment))

(2015/C 046/50)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Austria (represented by: C. Pesendorfer, J. Bauer, acting as Agents, assisted by T. Rabl, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: V. Kreuschitz and T. Maxian Rusche, then by T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented initially by: S. Behzadi-Spencer and S. Ossowski, then by S. Behzadi-Spencer and L. Christie, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2011/528/EU of 8 March 2011 on State Aid C-24/09 (ex N 446/08) — State aid for energy-intensive businesses under the Green Electricity Act in Austria (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 42).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 232, 6.8.2011.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.372 Gauges and vapor return for cargo vapor pressures exceeding 100 kPa (approx. 14.7 psia). When table 1 references this section, the containment system must have a: ( a ) Tank pressure gauge at the point where cargo flow is controlled during transfer; and
( b ) Vapor return connection.
[CGD 73-96, 42 FR 49027, Sept. 26, 1977; 42 FR 57126, Nov. 1, 1977, as amended by CGD 81-078, 50 FR 21173, May 22, 1985]
# C_2012058EN.01000502.xml

| 25.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/5

---

Appeal brought on 19 December 2011 by Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana, S. Coop. Galega against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 5 October 2011 in Case T-421/10 Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana, S. Coop. Galega v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and María Constantina Sotelo Ares

(Case C-649/11 P)

2012/C 58/07

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana, S. Coop. Galega (represented by: I. Temiño Ceniceros, Abogado)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and María Constantina Sotelo Ares

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the appeal admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the appeal admissible;

| — | set aside in full the judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2011 in Case T-421/10; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside in full the judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2011 in Case T-421/10;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

| 1. | Infringement by the General Court of the duty to state reasons and, in particular, of Article 36 of Protocol (No 3) on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, in conjunction with Article 53 thereof. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Infringement by the General Court of the duty to state reasons and, in particular, of Article 36 of Protocol (No 3) on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, in conjunction with Article 53 thereof.

| 2. | Infringement of the rights of defence of Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana, S. Coop. Galega and of the right to a fair hearing and, in particular, of Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Infringement of the rights of defence of Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana, S. Coop. Galega and of the right to a fair hearing and, in particular, of Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

| 3. | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009 (1) of 26 February 2009. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009 (1) of 26 February 2009.

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
§ 176.620 Description of the Alternative Hull Examination (AHE) Program for certain passenger vessels. The Alternative Hull Examination (AHE) Program provides you with an alternative to a drydock examination by allowing your vessel's hull to be examined while it remains afloat. If completed using only divers, this program has four steps: the application process, the preliminary examination, the pre-survey meeting, and the hull examination. If the vessel is already participating in the program, or if a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) is used during the program, the preliminary exam step may be omitted. Once you complete these steps, the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI), will evaluate the results and accept the examination as a credit hull exam if the vessel is in satisfactory condition. If only divers are used for the underwater survey portion of the examination process, you may receive credit for a period of time such that subsequent AHEs would be conducted at intervals of twice in every five years, with no more than three years between any two AHEs. The OCMI may waive an underwater survey in accordance with § 176.655(d) provided that the interval does not exceed five years between any two underwater surveys. If an underwater ROV is used as the predominate method to examine the vessel's underwater hull plating, you may receive credit up to five years. At the end of this period, you may apply for further participation under the AHE Program. Note to § 176.620 :
The expected hull coverage when using an ROV must be at least 80 percent.
[USCG-2000-6858, 69 FR 47384, Aug. 5, 2004]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

__________________________________________ 

) 

DJAMEL AMEZIANE, ) 

 ) 

 Petitioner, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) Civil Action No. 05-392 (ESH) 

 ) 

BARACK OBAMA, et al., ) 

 ) 

 ) 

 Respondents. ) 

__________________________________________) 

ORDER 

Upon consideration of Respondents’ Motion for Continuance of the October 7, 2013 

hearing [Dkt. No. 325], and considering the current furloughs of Justice Department attorneys, 

including those assigned to Guantanamo cases, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is 

GRANTED, and that the hearing scheduled for October 7, 2013 is VACATED. The Court will, 

however, proceed to decide the motion for release expeditiously. 

SO ORDERED. 

 /s/ 

 ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE 

 United States District Judge 

Date: October 2, 2013
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.665 Welding procedures.

Welding procedure tests for cargo tanks for a design temperature colder than 0 °C (32 °F), process pressure vessels, and piping must meet § 54.05-15 and Subpart 57.03 of this chapter.
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Park Place Entertainment Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Wallace R. Barr, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to thebest of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated the  15th day of May 2003        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
|                                   |
| /s/ WALLACE R. BARR                    |   |
| Wallace R. Barr                        |
| President and Chief Executive Officer, |
| Park Place Entertainment Corporation   |

 

----

*      The signed original of this written statementhas been retained by Park Place Entertainment Corporation and will be furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION


OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES OXLEY ACT








In connection with the Annual Report of Euro Group of Companies, Inc. (formerly ICT Technologies, Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 10-/A for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew Eracleous, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) The Report of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/  Andrew Eracleous


-----------------------------------


Andrew Eracleous


November 19, 2010











These certifications are being furnished pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, shall not be deemed to be filed as part of the periodic report described herein nor shall they be deemed filed by Euro Group of Companies, inc. for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of


1934,as amended.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.023-7 Procedure for approval. ( a ) Signals are approved by the Coast Guard under the procedures in subpart 159.005 of this chapter.
( b ) [Reserved]
---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
  PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Barry MacNeil, Chief Financial Officer of Trans-Orient
  Petroleum Ltd. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
  2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report for the fiscal year ended July
        31, 2004 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
        and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of the Company.                                                   

| | By:    | /s/ Barry MacNeil      
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Barry MacNeil          
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | June 24, 2005          

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
  and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on
  Form 20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company
  and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
  20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
  except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
  purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
  "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
  reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
  Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates
  it by reference.

---
#### Hiram Dillenbeck, *Respondent, v.*Ambrose Gray, and others, Appellants.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, on the ground that the case involves questions of law which ought to be reviewed by that court.
#### Mary A. Warner, *as Landlord, Respondent, v.*Mercy Henderson, *as Tenant, Appellant*.

Judgment of the County Court and of the Justices’ Court reversed, with costs. Opinion by

Haight, J.
Exhibit 32.1

Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George G. Andrews, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ George G. AndrewsGeorge G. Andrews, Chief Executive Officer and Director


August 14, 2009
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Artificial Life, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Eberhard Schoeneburg, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Eberhard Schoeneburg

Eberhard Schoeneburg
Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer
November 14, 2002
# C_2012138EN.01003103.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/31

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 7 July 2011 — Bracalente v Commission

(Case F-20/11)

(Civil service - Persons claiming the status of official or servant of the European Union - Action - Manifestly inadmissible - Failure to comply with preliminary procedure)

(2012/C 138/70)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Gianpaolo Bracalente (Ispra, Italy) (represented by: S. Costantino, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Re:

The applicant’s request to be granted the status of servant of the European Union.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Bracalente shall bear his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Bracalente shall bear his own costs.

---
§ 172.225 Calculations. ( a ) Each vessel must be shown by design calculations to meet the survival conditions in § 172.245 in each condition of loading and operation, assuming the damage specified in § 172.230.
( b ) When doing the calculations required by paragraph (a) of this section, the virtual increase in the vertical center of gravity due to a liquid in a space must be determined by calculating either— ( 1 ) The free surface effect of the liquid with the vessel assumed heeled five degrees from the vertical; or
( 2 ) The shift of the center of gravity of the liquid by the moment of transference method.
( c ) In calculating the free surface effect of consumable liquids, it must be assumed that, for each type of liquid, at least one transverse pair of wing tanks or a single centerline tank has a free surface. The tank or combination of tanks selected must be those having the greatest free surface effect.
( d ) When doing the calculations required by paragraph (a) of this section, the buoyancy of any superstructure directly above the side damage must not be considered. The unflooded parts of superstructures beyond the extent of damage may be considered if they are separated from the damaged space by watertight bulkheads and no progressive flooding of these intact spaces takes place.
#### § 167.40-20 Deep-sea sounding apparatus.

Nautical school ships shall be equipped with an efficient or electronic deep-sea sounding apparatus. The electronic deep-sea sounding apparatus required shall be installed, kept in working order, and ready for immediate use.

[CGFR 58-10, 23 FR 4686, June 26, 1958, as amended by CGD 75-074, 42 FR 5964, Jan. 31, 1977; CGD 95-027, 61 FR 26010, May 23, 1996]
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thinkpath, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Declan
A. French, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.



November 11, 2003                            By: /s/ Declan A. French
                                                ---------------------------
                                             Name: Declan A. French
                                             Title: Chief Executive Officer