alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 181 (Monday, September 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58074-58075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23999]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7590]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Sanja Ivekovi[cacute]: Sweet Violence''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Sanja Ivekovi[cacute]: Sweet Violence,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of

[[Page 58075]]

Modern Art, New York, New York, from on or about December 18, 2011, 
until on or about March 26, 2012, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 12, 2011.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-23999 Filed 9-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
G-19 Checks Accessing a Credit Card Sample 

Interest and Fee Information 

APR for Check 

Transactions 

1.7% (Intro. APR through your November 2007 billing cycle) 

After November 2007, you will be charged the APR for Cash Advances, currently 

21.99%. 

Fee Either $5 or 3% of the amount of each transfer, whichever is greater. 

Grace Period There is no grace period for transactions you make with these checks; we will begin 

charging interest on the transaction date.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Friday, May 25, 2007.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

Surveillance Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-1957 Filed 4-16-07; 4:11 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
#### Lyman S. Ellis, *Respondent, v.*Orson C. Brown and Daniel Lane, *Appellants*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
§ 185.340 Vessels carrying vehicles. ( a ) Automobiles or other vehicles must be stowed in such a manner as to permit both passengers and crew to get out and away from the vehicles freely in the event of fire or other disaster. The decks, where necessary, must be distinctly marked with painted lines to indicate the vehicle runways and the aisle spaces.
( b ) The master shall take any necessary precautions to see that automobiles or other vehicles have their motors turned off and their emergency brakes set when the vessel is underway, and that the motors are not started until the vessel is secured to the landing. In addition, a vehicle at each end of a line of vehicles or next to a loading ramp must have its wheels securely blocked, while the vessel is being navigated.
( c ) The master shall have appropriate “NO SMOKING” signs posted and shall take all necessary precautions to prevent smoking or carrying of lighted or smoldering pipes, cigars, cigarettes, or similar items in the deck area assigned to automobiles or other vehicles.
( d ) The master shall, prior to getting underway, ensure that vehicles are properly distributed consistent with the guidance in the vessel's stability letter and Certificate of Inspection, if applicable.
§ 171.115 Specific applicability. ( a ) Sections 171.116, 171.117, and 171.118 apply to each vessel of 100 gross tons or more.
( b ) Section 171.119 applies to each vessel under 100 gross tons.
[CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51017, Nov. 4, 1983, as amended by CGD 85-080, 61 FR 945, Jan. 10, 1996; 62 FR 51353, Sept. 30, 1997]
#### § 172.240 Permeability of spaces.

When doing the calculations required in [§ 172.225](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-172.225),

(a) The permeability of a floodable space, other than a machinery or cargo space, must be assumed as listed in Table [172.240](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-172.240);

(b) Calculations in which a machinery space is treated as a floodable space must be based on an assumed machinery space permeability of 85% unless the use of an assumed permeability of less than 85% is justified in detail; and

(c) Calculations in which a cargo space that is completely filled is considered flooded must be based on an assumed cargo space permeability of 60% unless the use of an assumed permeability of less than 60% is justified in detail. If the cargo space is not completely filled, a cargo space permeability of 95% must be assumed unless the use of an assumed permeability of less than 95% is justified in detail.

Table [172.240](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-172.240)—Permeability

| Spaces and tanks | Permeability (percent) |
| --- | --- |
| Storeroom spaces | 60 |
| Accommodations spaces | 95 |
| Voids | 95 |
| Consumable liquid tanks | 1 95 or 0 |
| Other liquid tanks | 2 95 or 0 |
| Cargo (completely filled) | 60 |
| Cargo (empty) | 95 |
| Machinery | 85 |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1 Whichever results in the more disabling condition. | |
| 2 If tanks are partially filled, the permeability must be determined from the actual density and amount of liquid carried. | |
§ 167.60-1 Issuance by Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection. ( a ) Every nautical school ship shall be inspected annually and if in the opinion of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, the nautical school ship can be operated safely, he shall issue a certificate of inspection with the following endorsement: “Nautical School Ship” in lieu of the classification “Passenger vessel”, “cargo vessel”, etc.
( b ) When a nautical school ship, in the opinion of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, may be navigated on the waters of any ocean or the Gulf of Mexico more than 20 nautical miles offshore, the route shall be designated on certificate of inspection as “Ocean”.
( c ) When a nautical school ship, in the opinion of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, may be navigated on the waters of any ocean or the Gulf of Mexico 20 nautical miles or less offshore, the route shall be designated on the certificate of inspection as “Coastwise”.
( d ) Documented vessels of 500 gross tons or more, certificated for ocean or coastwise service, which do not comply with the requirements of SOLAS 74 for cargo vessels shall have their certificate of inspection endorsed “Domestic Voyages Only.”
[CGFR 51-11, 16 FR 3218, Apr. 12, 1951, as amended by CGFR 69-127, 35 FR 9982, June 17, 1970; CGD 90-008, 55 FR 30663, July 26, 1990; USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58286, Sept. 29, 2014]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-50620 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALFONSO MARTINEZ-PERALES, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-00-CR-77-OG

- - - - - - - - - - April 12, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Alfonso Martinez-Perales appeals his sentence following his guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Martinez argues that his sentence should not have exceeded the two-year maximum sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Martinez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000).No. 00-50620 - 2 - Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 120 S. Ct. at 2362; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001)

. Martinez’s argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , 523 U.S. at 235. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is granted. AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

SERGEI KOVALEV,

Petitioner

v.

BORIS RUBINSTEIN, DMD, GRACE WOO, 

DMD, YES DENTAL, P.C., HEALTH 

PARTNERS PLANS, INC., WILLIAM S. 

GEORGE, AVESIS, INC. AND CHRIS 

SWANKER,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 165 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of October, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                            LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
                                  (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                 FOR THE YEAR       FOR THE YEAR        FOR THE YEAR      FOR THE YEAR       FOR THE NINE
                                     ENDED              ENDED               ENDED             ENDED          MONTHS ENDED
                                 SEPTEMBER 30,      SEPTEMBER 30,       SEPTEMBER 30,     SEPTEMBER 30,      SEPTEMBER 30,
                                     2000               1999                1998              1997               1996
                                --------------     --------------      --------------    --------------     ------------
<S>                            <C>                <C>                  <C>              <C>                <C>
Income From Continuing Operations
 Before Income Taxes and Losses
  From Equity Investments .......   $3,030              $4,801              $2,127              $1,219              $229
Less Interest
 Capitalized During
  the Period ....................       20                  20                  17                  14                14

Add Fixed Charges ...............      667                 612                 441                 393               273
                                    ------              ------              ------              ------              ----
 Total Earnings .................   $3,677              $5,393              $2,551              $1,598              $488
Fixed Charges
Total Interest Expense
 Including
 Capitalized Interest ...........   $  434              $  428              $  298              $  281              $210
Interest Portion of
  Rental Expenses ...............      233                 184                 143                 112                63
                                    ------              ------              ------              ------              ----
 Total Fixed Charges ............   $  667              $  612              $  441              $  393              $273

Ratio of Earnings to
  Fixed Charges .................      5.5                 8.8                 5.8                 4.1               1.8
</TABLE>


         Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the
         current year presentation.
Editorial Note on Part 162
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 162.028-7 Procedure for listing and labeling. ( a ) Manufacturers having models of extinguishers they believe are suitable for marine service may make application for listing and labeling of such product as a “marine-type” portable fire extinguisher by addressing a request directly to a recognized laboratory. The laboratory will inform the submitter as to the requirements for inspection, examinations, and testing necessary for such listing and labeling. All costs in connection with the examinations, tests, inspections, listing, and labeling are payable by the manufacturer.
( b ) [Reserved]
[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48278, July 22, 2016]
§ 196.05-5 Charts and nautical publications. As appropriate for the intended voyage, all vessels except barges, and vessels operating exclusively on rivers, must carry adequate and up-to-date— ( a ) Charts;
( b ) Sailing directions;
( c ) Coast pilots;
( d ) Light lists;
( e ) Notices to mariners;
( f ) Tide tables;
( g ) Current tables; and
( h ) All other nautical publications necessary.[1]
[CGD 75-074, 42 FR 5965, Jan. 31, 1977] Footnotes -
196.05-5
[1] For United States vessels in or on the navigable waters of the United States, see 33 CFR 164.33.
The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, Chief Judge, United States District Court 1

for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-2983

___________

Angela Rosamond, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

MCX Transport, Inc.; Joe Estes * [UNPUBLISHED]

Langley, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: January 6, 1999

 Filed: January 13, 1999 

___________

Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Angela Rosamond appeals from a jury verdict awarding her damages against

MCX Transport, Inc. Rosamond challenges certain evidentiary rulings by the district

court and its exclusion of a proffered jury instruction. Having carefully reviewed the 1

record and the parties& submissions on appeal, we conclude that the challenged

evidentiary rulings were not an abuse of the district court’s discretion and that the
-2-

court’s exclusion of the instruction in question did not violate Arkansas law.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit
31.2





I, Alan
Chaffee, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of SARS Corporation;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
small business issuer and have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;




b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting; and





5. The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business
issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are likely to adversely affect
the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and




b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.

















Dated: February
19,
2008                                                                                    
By: /s/ Alan
Chaffee


Alan Chaffee


Its: Interim Chief Financial
Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 164

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 164.207-1 Scope.

This subpart prescribes requirements for approval of fire-resisting divisions for high-speed craft as required by the International Code of Safety for High-Speed Craft (HSC Code).
§ 189.20-1 Prerequisite of certificate of inspection. ( a ) The initial inspection is a prerequisite of the issuance of the original certificate of inspection.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0649

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

TYLER FREDERICK ERICKSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 21, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 15 2022

08/15/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0649
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.514 Piping: Electrical bonding. ( a ) Cargo tanks or piping that are separated from the hull structure by thermal isolation must be electrically bonded to the hull structure by a method under paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) A pipe joint or a hose connection fitting that has a gasket must be electrically bonded by a method under paragraph (c) of this section that bonds: ( 1 ) Both sides of the connection to the hull structure; or
( 2 ) Each side of the connection to the other side.
( c ) An electrical bond must be made by at least one of the following methods: ( 1 ) A metal bonding strap attached by welding or bolting.
( 2 ) Two or more bolts that give metal to metal contact between the bolts and the parts to be bonded.
( 3 ) Metal to metal contact between adjacent parts under designed operating conditions.
#### T. L. Marrin, appellee, v. John A. Randall, Receiver, appellant. R. N. Hayward, appellee, v. John A. Randall, Receiver, appellant. E. G. Martz, appellee, v. John A. Randall, Receiver, appellant.

Filed November 13, 1915.

Nos. 18368, 18370, 18371.

Appeal from the district court for Grant county: James N. Paul, Judge.

*Reversed.*

*Burkett, Wilson & Brown,*for appellant.

*D. F. Osgood, contra.*

Letton, J.

These cases involve the same question decided in *Alden Mercantile Co. v. Randall, ante,*p. 44, and for the reasons set forth in that opinion the judgment of the district court is

Reversed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PowerHouse Technologies Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jay Elliot, Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Jay Elliot
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   December 20, 2005