alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012025EN.01006702.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/67

---

Action brought on 3 October 2011 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-99/11)

(2012/C 25/128)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the implied decision of the Commission rejecting the applicant’s claim for payment of salary arrears for the period from 1 June 2005 to 21 July 2010.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Civil Service Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decision issued by — or, in any event, attributable to — the Commission, rejecting — howsoever and whether in whole or in part — the claims set out in the application of 20 August 2010, sent to the appointing authority on 20 August 2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision issued by — or, in any event, attributable to — the Commission, rejecting — howsoever and whether in whole or in part — the claims set out in the application of 20 August 2010, sent to the appointing authority on 20 August 2010;

| — | annul, quatenus opus est, Note Ares(2011)217354 as registered on 28 February 2011 and received by the applicant on 6 April 2011 at the earliest; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul, quatenus opus est, Note Ares(2011)217354 as registered on 28 February 2011 and received by the applicant on 6 April 2011 at the earliest;

| — | annul the decision issued by the Commission rejecting, howsoever, the claims set out in the complaint of 24 February 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision issued by the Commission rejecting, howsoever, the claims set out in the complaint of 24 February 2011;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
§ 169.221 Initial inspection for certification. ( a ) The initial inspection includes an inspection of the hull structure, yards, masts, spars, rigging, sails, machinery, and equipment, including unfired pressure vessels.
( b ) The initial inspection of a vessel being newly constructed or converted normally consists of a series of inspections during the construction or conversion.
( c ) The inspection ensures that the vessel and its equipment comply with the regulations in this subchapter to the extent they are applicable to the vessel being inspected, and are in accordance with approved plans. The inspection also ensures that the materials, workmanship and condition of all parts of the vessel and its machinery and equipment are in all respects satisfactory for the service intended, and that the vessel is in possession of a valid certificate issued by the Federal Communications Commission, if required.
( d ) Before construction is started, the owner, operator, or builder must develop plans indicating the proposed arrangement and construction of the vessel. This list of plans to be developed and the required disposition of these plans are set forth in § 169.305.
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.138-4 Approval procedures. ( a ) Manufacturers that desire type approval should submit a written notice to the Commandant (CG-ENG-4) describing the product and its intended uses. The Commandant will evaluate this information and notify the manufacturer of the product's suitability for testing. The manufacturer should then contract directly with an accepted independent laboratory to perform the required tests and inspections.
( b ) Upon completion of the required testing and inspections, the manufacturer must submit either a written request for type approval to the Commandant (CG-ENG-4), United States Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, or electronically submit a request to *typeapproval@uscg.mil .* The request must indicate the name and address of the manufacturer, all product designations, and the address of all manufacturing facilities. The request must include a copy of the final fire test report and the production inspection procedures. From the information submitted, the Commandant determines whether or not the product is acceptable for type approval. If the product is determined to be acceptable, a type approval certificate valid for a 5-year period will be issued. If the product is not accepted, the manufacturer will be notified of the reasons why.
\ 

Airport Manager 

Santa iVlonicu Airport 

3223 Donald D~1ug!as Loop South. Suite 3 

Santa Monica. CA 90405 

Dear Mr. Trimbo111: 

Thank you for your letter dolled May 7 200J, concl'!rning Santa Monica Airport (SMO) and your 

n.:quc:.t fix h.:deral A\'i<1Lion Administration (PAA) appro\'al or reimbursement for project costs 

under an Airport lmpro\·emcnt Program (AlP) grant agreement. 

As you know, on June 2. I ~c)-l, the city of Santa Monica applied for a federal grant to linancc 

and eonstnlct proposed projects at SMO. On June 29, 1994, the city accepted ll grant offer with 

a maximun1 federal oblig<Jtion of S 1,604.700 to accomplish the projects. The specific grant is 

identified as No. AlP 3-06-0239-06. Two construction contracts were required to accomplish the 

work description with the physical completion of the last contract in the March 2002 timcfhmlc. 

Upon payment by FAA of the maximum S 1.604, 700 federal share to the city and the physical completion of the projects' construction, the grant <lgrcemcnt was fimmcially and 

administratively closed. Subsequently, the city submitted a request to amend the grant 

agreement increasing the fc{lcral oblig<llion by 15%), or 5240,600. 

l3ascd on the information provided by the city, FAA is processing the documentation to reopen 

the grant to amend the gmnt agreement, thereby increasing tile maximum U.S. obligation. The 

grunt amendment should be offered to the city once the additional federal funds become 

available. 

II' you ha,·c any questions, please contact Mark !VlcClardy. Acting Manager, Airports Di\'ision, at 

(31 0) 725-3600. 

Sincerely. 

William C. Withycombe 

Regional Administrator 

cc: AWP-1, AWP-600A, AWP-620A, AWP-621
EXHIBIT 23.2

                          Independent Auditors' Consent

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-81677) pertaining to the ARCA Corporation 1999 Dual Stock Option
Plan of our report dated July 21, 1999, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Agate Technologies, Inc. included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-KSB) for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and year ended December
31, 1998.



     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
     /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Jose, California
July 11, 2000
#### Louis Stern and another, *Administrators, etc., Respondents, v.*Joseph E. Newburger, *Appellan*t.

Order reversed, without costs. Opinion by

Brady, J.
#### § 144.720 Crew rest consideration.

The condition of the crew accommodations must consider the importance of crew rest. Factors to consider include vibrations, ambient light, noise levels, and general comfort. Every effort must be made to ensure that quarters help provide a suitable environment for sleep and off-duty rest.
§ 92.7 Designation and responsibilities of a Section 1557 Coordinator. ( a ) *Section 1557 Coordinator and designees.* A covered entity that employs fifteen or more persons must designate and authorize at least one employee, a “Section 1557 Coordinator,” to coordinate the covered entity's compliance with its responsibilities under section 1557 and this part in its health programs and activities, including the investigation of any grievance communicated to it alleging noncompliance with section 1557 or this part or alleging any action that would be prohibited by section 1557 or this part. As appropriate, a covered entity may assign one or more designees to carry out some of these responsibilities, but the Section 1557 Coordinator must retain ultimate oversight for ensuring coordination with the covered entity's compliance with this part.
( b ) *Responsibilities of a Section 1557 Coordinator.* A covered entity must ensure that, at minimum, the Section 1557 Coordinator: ( 1 ) Receives, reviews, and processes grievances, filed under the grievance procedure as set forth in § 92.8(c);
( 2 ) Coordinates the covered entity's recordkeeping requirements as set forth in § 92.8(c);
( 3 ) Coordinates effective implementation of the covered entity's language access procedures as set forth in § 92.8(d);
( 4 ) Coordinates effective implementation of the covered entity's effective communication procedures as set forth in § 92.8(e);
( 5 ) Coordinates effective implementation of the covered entity's reasonable modification procedures as set forth in § 92.8(f); and
( 6 ) Coordinates training of relevant employees as set forth in § 92.9, including maintaining documentation required by such section.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 213 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 213

      To repeal the sunset of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 
    Reconciliation Act of 2001 with respect to the expansion of the 
           adoption credit and adoption assistance programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2009

 Mr. Wilson of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To repeal the sunset of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 
    Reconciliation Act of 2001 with respect to the expansion of the 
           adoption credit and adoption assistance programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Adoption Tax Relief Guarantee Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SUNSET OF EXPANSION OF ADOPTION CREDIT AND ADOPTION 
              ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS.

    Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act 
of 2001 shall not apply to section 202 of such Act (relating to 
expansion of adoption credit and adoption assistance programs).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2013 (the "Form 10-Q") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").



I, Tracey A. Welsh, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer of the Issuer, certify that to my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: August 13, 2013 |                                                             
|---------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |                                                             
|                       | /s/ Tracey A. Welsh                                         
|                       | Tracey A. Welsh                                             
|                       | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2170 

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to establish a program to provide 

covered institutions loans for conversion to use of biomass for energy 

generation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2009 

Mr. FORTENBERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to establish a program 

to provide covered institutions loans for conversion to 

use of biomass for energy generation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LOAN PROGRAM FOR CONVERSION TO BIO4 MASS ENERGY GENERATION. 

5 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary of Agriculture 

6 shall establish a program to provide zero-interest loans to 

7 covered institutions for capital costs for converting to the 

8 use of biomass for energy generation. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2170 IH

1 (b) USE OF LOAN FUNDS.—The Secretary shall en2 sure that a covered institution receiving a loan under the 

3 program established under subsection (a) will use woody 

4 biomass for not less than 75 percent of the energy genera5 tion resulting from the conversion to the use of biomass 

6 for such generation. 

7 (c) REVOLVING FUND.— 

8 (1) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established in 

9 the Treasury a revolving fund for the program es10 tablished under subsection (a). 

11 (2) USE OF AMOUNTS IN FUND.—The Sec12 retary shall use the amounts in the revolving fund 

13 established under paragraph (1) to carry out the 

14 program established under subsection (a). 

15 (3) DEPOSITS.—The Secretary shall deposit 

16 amounts received as payment on loans provided 

17 under the program established under subsection (a) 

18 into the revolving fund established under paragraph 

19 (1). 

20 (4) INITIAL DEPOSIT.—Of the funds of the 

21 Commodity Credit Corporation, the Secretary shall 

22 make available $100,000,000 to the revolving fund 

23 established under paragraph (1). 

24 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2170 IH

1 (1) COVERED INSTITUTION.—The term ‘‘cov2 ered institution’’ means— 

3 (A) an institution of higher education (as 

4 defined in section 101 of the Higher Education 

5 Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001)); 

6 (B) a public or private elementary or sec7 ondary school; or 

8 (C) a hospital. 

9 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

10 the Secretary of Agriculture. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
RB

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0393

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JUSTIN DEAN KALINA,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including February 11, 2024, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

January 4 2024

01/04/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0393
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.047-3 Materials. ( a ) *General.* All components used in the construction of buoyant vests must meet the applicable requirements of subpart 164.019 of this chapter. The requirements for materials specified in this section are minimum requirements, and consideration will be given to the use of alternate materials in lieu of those specified. Detailed technical data and samples of all proposed alternate materials must be submitted for approval before those materials are incorporated in the finished product.
( b ) *Kapok.* The kapok shall be all new material complying with Subpart 164.003 of this subchapter and shall be properly processed.
( c ) *Fibrous glass.* The fibrous glass shall comply with the requirements of specification MIL-B-2766.
( d ) *Envelope.* The buoyant vest envelope, or cover, shall be made from 39′′, 2.85 cotton jeans cloth, with a thread count of approximately 96 × 64. The finished goods shall weigh not less than 4.2 ounces per square yard, shall have a thread count of not less than 94 × 60, and shall have a breaking strength of not less than 85 pounds in the warp and 50 pounds in the filling. Other cotton fabrics having a weight and breaking strength not less than the above will be acceptable. There are no restrictions as to color, but the fastness of the color to laundering, water, crocking and light shall be rated “good” when tested in accordance with Federal Test Method Standard No. 191, Methods 5610, 5630, 5650, and 5660.
( e ) *Pad covering.* The covering for the buoyant pad inserts shall be flexible vinyl film not less than 0.006′′ in thickness meeting the requirements of Federal Specification L-P-375 for Type I or II, class 1, film.
( f ) *Tie tapes and body strap loops.* The tie tapes and body strap loops for an adult or child size buoyant vest specified by this subpart must be 3 ⁄ 4-inch cotton webbing meeting the requirements in military specification MIL-T-43566 (Class I) for Type I webbing. (f-1) *Body straps.* The complete body strap assembly, including hardware, must have a breaking strength of 150 pounds for an adult size and 115 pounds for a child size. The specifications for the webbing are as follows: ( 1 ) For an adult size vest, the webbing must be 1 inch.
( 2 ) For a child size vest, the webbing must be three-fourth inch and meet the requirements of military specification MIL-W-530 for Type IIa webbing. (f-2) *Reinforcing tape.* The reinforcing tape around the neck of a buoyant vest specified by this subpart must be 3 ⁄ 4-inch cotton tape weighing 0.18 ounce or more per linear yard and having a minimum breaking strength of 120 pounds.
( g ) [Reserved]
( h ) *Thread.* Each thread must meet the requirements of subpart 164.023 of this chapter. Only one kind of thread may be used in each seam.
[CGFR 65-37, 30 FR 11581, Sept. 10, 1965, as amended by CGD 72-90R, 37 FR 10836, May 31, 1972; CGD 73-130R 39 FR 20684, June 13, 1974; CGD 78-012; 43 FR 27154, June 22, 1978; CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4782, Feb. 3, 1983; CGD 84-068, 58 FR 29493, May 20, 1993]
Exhibit 10.21
 Execution Copy
Senior Management
 
  
 Grant Date Company Optionee
 Stock
 Plan
  Grant of Option . Option Period Option Share Number Code
 Deferred Compensation Account Deferred Compensation
Account Target Exercise Price




---



##### 



provided however provided however further provided however
   -2-




---



##### 



Spread Value Zone
    Exercise of Options
     -3-




---



##### 



Vesting Date Vesting Periods
  Termination of Employment
    -4-




---



##### 



Method of Exercising Option
 Mature Shares
  -5-




---



##### 



Issuance of Shares .
 Non-Transferability .
 Rights as Stockholder .
 Compliance with Law . ab initio
 -6-




---



##### 



provided however
 Notice .
 Binding Effect .
 Governing Law .
 Plan .
 -7-




---



##### 



LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.By:Name:
    
    Michael B. TargoffTitle:
    
    CEO and PresidentAccepted:OptioneeAddressSocial Security Number
 -8-
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-20780 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

CURTIS SCOTT,

 Defendant. 

_________________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT CURTIS SCOTT’S 

RENEWED MOTION TO SUPPRESS (ECF #61) 

 On December 9, 2014, a grand jury indicted Defendant Curtis Scott 

(“Scott”) on one count of making a false statement to a federal agent in violation of 

18 U.S.C. § 1001. Scott thereafter filed three motions to suppress certain evidence 

gathered by law enforcement officers during their investigation. (See ECF ## 15-

17.) On August 5, 2015, this Court entered an Opinion and Order denying Scott’s 

motions to suppress. (See ECF # 37.) 

 On November 24, 2015, a grand jury returned a first superseding indictment 

against Scott. (See ECF # 45.) The new indictment adds two counts against Scott: 

(1) carjacking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2119(1) and §2 and (2) using a firearm in 

connection with a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) and §2. 

(See id.) Scott has now filed a renewed motion to suppress (the “Renewed Motion 

2:14-cr-20780-MFL-DRG Doc # 62 Filed 01/25/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 569
2 

to Suppress”). (See ECF #61.) The Renewed Motion to Suppress seeks to 

suppress the same evidence that was the subject of Scott’s original motions to 

suppress. (See id.) Scott has not advanced any new arguments in favor of 

suppression. Instead, Scott says that he has filed the Renewed Motion to Suppress 

solely to make clear in the record that he is seeking to suppress the evidence that 

was the subject of his original motions to suppress with respect to all three charges 

now brought against him. 

 For all of the reasons explained in the Court’s Opinion and Order denying 

the original motions to suppress (see ECF #37), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 

the Renewed Motion to Suppress (ECF #61) is DENIED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

Dated: January 25, 2016 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on January 25, 2016, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113 

2:14-cr-20780-MFL-DRG Doc # 62 Filed 01/25/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 570
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.151-61 Maintenance instructions. ( a ) The liferaft manufacturer shall make maintenance instructions available in English to purchasers of inflatable liferafts approved by the Coast Guard, to enable vessel operators to meet SOLAS Chapter III, Regulation 36 (III/36).
( b ) The maintenance instructions required by paragraph (a) of this section must include— ( 1 ) A checklist for use in monthly, external, visual inspections of the packed liferaft;
( 2 ) An explanation of the requirements for periodic servicing of the liferaft by an approved servicing facility; and
( 3 ) A log for maintaining records of inspections and maintenance.
[CGD 85-205, 62 FR 25547, May 9, 1997, as amended by USCG-2010-0048, 76 FR 62999, Oct. 11, 2011]