UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-QSB

             [ X ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                  FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2007
                                       OR

              [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
                               OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

         FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ____________ TO ________________

                        COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-14813

                                 THINKPATH INC.

        (EXACT NAME OF SMALL BUSINESS ISSUER AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)


                           ONTARIO                  52-209027
                  --------------------------------------------
                (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
               INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) IDENTIFICATION NO.)

       16 FOUR SEASONS PLACE, SUITE 215, TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA M9B 6E5
               ---------------------------------------------------
               (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES) (ZIP CODE)

                                 (416) 622-5200
                               -------------------
                (ISSUER'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)

CHECK WHETHER THE ISSUER: (1) FILED ALL REPORTS REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY
SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT DURING THE PAST 12 MONTHS (OR FOR SUCH
SHORTER PERIOD THAT THE REGISTRANT WAS REQUIRED TO FILE SUCH REPORTS),
AND (2)
HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PAST 90 DAYS.
YES |X|         NO |_|

INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT IS A SHELL COMPANY
(AS DEFINED IN RULE 12B-2 OF THE EXCHANGE ACT)
YES | |        NO  |X|

AS OF MAY 21, 2007 THERE WERE 6,010,262 SHARES OF COMMON
STOCK, NO PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OUTSTANDING.

TRANSITIONAL SMALL BUSINESS DISCLOSURE FORMAT (CHECK ONE) YES | |     NO |X|




<PAGE>


                                 THINKPATH INC.

                 MARCH 31, 2007 QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB

                                TABLE OF CONTENTS



                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                                                                     Page Number


Item 1.  Financial Statements

             Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2007 and
             December 31, 2006.............................................. 4-5
             Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months
             ended March 31, 2007 and 2006..................................   6
             Interim Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
             for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and the year ended
             December 31, 2006..............................................   7
             Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months
             ended March 31, 2007 and 2006..................................   8
             Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements............ 9-30

Item 2.  Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation........ 31-46

Item 3.  Controls and Procedures............................................  46


                          PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings .................................................  46

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds........  47

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities ...................................  47

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders ...............  47

Item 5.  Other Information .................................................  47

Item 6.  Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K ..................................  47

         Signatures ........................................................  48






<PAGE>


ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS














                                 THINKPATH INC.


                    INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                              AS OF MARCH 31, 2007

                        (AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)









<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


THINKPATH INC.
INTERIM CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF MARCH 31, 2007 (UNAUDITED) AND DECEMBER 31, 2006
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)


                                                       3/31/2007     12/31/2006
                                                       ---------     ----------
                                                               $              $

                                     ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS
<S>                                                       <C>            <C>
      Cash                                                68,265         114,041
      Accounts receivable (note 5)                     2,764,510       2,150,413
      Prepaid expenses                                   121,321         132,814
                                                       ---------      ----------

                                                       2,954,096       2,397,268

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT (note 6)                          546,342         590,283

GOODWILL (note 7)                                      2,359,318       2,359,318

OTHER ASSETS (note 8)                                    273,681         302,508
                                                       ---------      ----------
                                                       6,133,437       5,649,377
                                                       =========      ==========










          The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim
                       consolidated financial statements.

</TABLE>


                                      -4-
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

THINKPATH INC.
INTERIM CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF MARCH 31, 2007 (UNAUDITED) AND DECEMBER 31, 2006
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)


                                                       3/31/2007     12/31/2006
                                                     -----------    -----------
                                                               $              $

                                  LIABILITIES

CURRENT LIABILITIES
<S>                                                  <C>            <C>
      Laurus revolving note (note 9)                   3,208,938      2,921,792
      Accounts payable (note 10)                       1,890,724      1,493,223
      Current portion of long-term debt (note 11)        940,662        824,709
                                                     -----------    -----------
                                                       6,040,324      5,239,724


      LONG-TERM DEBT (note 11)                           651,595        730,976
      CONVERTIBLE FINANCING - DERIVATIVES (note 9)       770,137        817,303
                                                     -----------    -----------

                                                       7,462,056      6,788,003
                                                     ===========    ===========
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (note 17)

                       STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)


CAPITAL STOCK (note 12)                               42,266,530     42,266,530

DEFICIT                                              (42,565,783)   (42,376,656)

ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS                  (1,029,366)    (1,028,500)
                                                     -----------    -----------
                                                      (1,328,619)    (1,138,626)
                                                     -----------    -----------
                                                       6,133,437      5,649,377
                                                     ===========    ===========








          The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim
                       consolidated financial statements.
</TABLE>


                                      -5-
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

THINKPATH INC.
INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2007 AND 2006
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)

                                                        Three months ended March 31,
                                                               2007          2006
                                                          ---------     ---------
                                                                  $             $

<S>                                                       <C>           <C>
REVENUE                                                   3,851,932     2,910,314

COST OF SERVICES                                          2,482,925     2,088,930
                                                          ---------     ---------
GROSS PROFIT                                              1,369,007       821,384
                                                          ---------     ---------
EXPENSES
      Administrative                                        664,985       605,426
      Selling                                               467,944       473,816
      Depreciation and amortization                         103,250        87,932
      Write down of property and equipment                    3,443          --
      Financing costs and mark-to-market adjustments          4,031      (124,208)
                                                          ---------     ---------
                                                          1,243,653     1,042,966
                                                          ---------     ---------

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INTEREST CHARGES AND INCOME TAXES      125,354      (221,582)

      Interest Charges                                      310,940       142,231
                                                          ---------     ---------
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES                                   (185,586)     (363,813)

      Income Taxes (note 13)                                  3,541         7,843
                                                          ---------     ---------
NET LOSS                                                   (189,127)     (371,656)
                                                          =========     =========

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON STOCK
      OUTSTANDING BASIC AND DILUTED                       9,826,082     4,369,147
                                                          =========     =========
NET LOSS PER WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON STOCK
      BASIC AND DILUTED                                       (0.02)        (0.09)
                                                          =========     =========



          The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim
                       consolidated financial statements.

</TABLE>


                                      -6-
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

THINKPATH INC.
INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2007 AND THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)


                                                  COMMON     PREFERRED                                                  ACCUMULATED
                                                   STOCK         STOCK         CAPITAL                                        OTHER
                                               NUMBER OF     NUMBER OF           STOCK                 COMPREHENSIVE  COMPREHENSIVE
                                                  SHARES        SHARES         AMOUNTS        DEFICIT           LOSS           LOSS
                                             --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                         <C>              <C>           <C>           <C>            <C>            <C>
Balance as of December 31, 2005                4,738,322                    40,486,219    (37,518,943)                     (949,673)
                                             ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========                   ===========

Net loss for the year                               --                            --       (4,857,713)    (4,857,713)

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
  Foreign currency translation adjustments                                                                   (78,827)       (78,827)
                                                                                                         -----------
Comprehensive loss                                                                                        (4,936,540)
                                                                                                         ===========

Common stock issued for acquisition            3,685,751                       763,000           --

Preferred stock issued for acquisition                              700        699,687           --

Common stock issued for services                 200,000                        68,000
                                                                                                 --

Accrued liabilities settled through the
issuance of common stock                       1,202,009                       249,624           --

                                             -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------                   -----------
Balance as of December 31, 2006                9,826,082            700     42,266,530    (42,376,656)                   (1,028,500)
                                             ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========                   ===========

Net loss for the period                             --                            --         (189,127)      (189,127)

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
  Foreign currency translation adjustments                                                                      (866)          (866)
                                                                                                         -----------

Comprehensive loss                                                                                          (189,993)
                                                                                                         ===========

                                             -----------    -----------    -----------    -----------                   -----------
Balance as of March 31, 2007                   9,826,082            700     42,266,530    (42,565,783)                   (1,029,366)
                                             ===========    ===========    ===========    ===========                   ===========







          The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim
                       consolidated financial statements.
</TABLE>


                                      -7-
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

THINKPATH INC.
INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2007 AND 2006
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)


                                                                  $           $
Cash flows from operating activities
<S>                                                        <C>         <C>
     Net loss                                              (189,127)   (371,656)

     Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
      cash used in operating activities:
     Depreciation and amortization                          103,250      87,932
     Amortization of deferred financing costs               115,655     142,105
     Mark-to-market of derivatives                         (280,407)   (266,313)
     Loss on extinguishment of debt                         168,783        --
     Write down of property and equipment                     3,443        --
     Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable            (612,489)     31,172
     Decrease in prepaid expenses                            11,542      22,913
     Increase in accounts payable                           398,234     148,283
                                                           --------   ---------
     Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities   (281,116)   (205,564)
                                                           --------   ---------

Cash flows from investing activities
     Purchase of property and equipment                     (16,473)     (5,470)

     Net cash used in investing activities                  (16,473)     (5,470)
                                                           --------   ---------
Cash flows from financing activities
     Proceeds from revolving financing facility             318,888        --
     Proceeds from convertible financing facility              --       165,891
     Deferred financing costs incurred                      (17,500)       --
     Repayment of long-term debt                            (46,415)    (20,072)
                                                           --------   ---------
     Net cash provided by financing activities              254,973     145,819
                                                           --------   ---------
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes             (3,160)     38,134
                                                           --------   ---------
Net decrease in cash                                        (45,776)    (27,081)
Cash
     Beginning of year                                      114,041     123,056
                                                           --------   ---------
     End of year                                             68,265      95,975
                                                           ========   =========

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH ITEMS:
     Interest paid                                          310,940     142,231
                                                           ========   =========
     Income taxes paid                                        3,541       7,843
                                                           ========   =========






          The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim
                       consolidated financial statements.
</TABLE>


                                      -8-
<PAGE>



THINKPATH INC.
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT MARCH 31, 2007
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)


1.   MANAGEMENT'S INTENTIONS AND GOING CONCERN

     Certain principal conditions and events are prevalent which indicate that
     there could be substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
     a going concern for a reasonable period of time. These conditions and
     events include significant recurring operating losses and working capital
     deficiencies. At March 31, 2007, the Company had a deficit of $42,565,783
     and has suffered recurring losses from operations.

     With insufficient working capital from operations, the Company's primary
     source of cash is a $4,000,000 financing facility with Laurus Master Fund,
     Ltd. ("Laurus"). At March 31, 2007, the balance on the facility was
     $3,706,218 (note 9). The facility consists of a revolving line of credit
     based on 90% of eligible accounts receivable which matures on June 27, 2008
     and bears interest at an annual rate equal to The Wall Street Journal prime
     rate plus 3%.

     As at May 18, 2007, management's plans to mitigate and alleviate its
     operating losses and working capital deficiencies include:

          a)   Raise additional working capital via convertible debt
          b)   Ongoing cost cutting measures as required to restore each office
               to profitability
          c)   Continued focus on securing customers with high growth potential,
               such as those in the aerospace and defense industries;
          d)   Complement organic growth with the acquisition of profitable
               engineering companies; and

     Although there can be no assurances, it is anticipated that continued cash
     flow improvements will be sufficient to cover current operating costs and
     will permit payments to certain vendors and interest payments on debt.
     Despite its negative working capital and deficit, the Company believes that
     its management has developed a business plan that if successfully
     implemented could substantially improve the Company's operational results
     and financial condition. However, the Company can give no assurances that
     its current cash flows from operations, if any, borrowings available under
     its financing facility with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., and proceeds from the
     sale of securities, will be adequate to fund its expected operating and
     capital needs for the next twelve months. The adequacy of cash resources
     over the next twelve months is primarily dependent on its operating
     results, and the closing of new financing, all of which are subject to
     substantial uncertainties. Cash flows from operations for the next twelve
     months will be dependent, among other factors, upon the effect of the
     current economic slowdown on sales, the impact of the restructuring plan
     and management's ability to implement its business plan. The failure to
     return to profitability and optimize operating cash flows in the short
     term, and close alternate financing, could have a material adverse effect
     on the Company's liquidity position and capital resources.


2.   SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

     a) Going Concern

     These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the going
     concern basis, which assumes the realization of assets and liquidation of
     liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The
     application of the going concern concept is dependent on the Company's
     ability to generate sufficient working capital from operations and external
     investors. These consolidated financial statements do not give effect to
     any adjustments should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern
     and, therefore, be required to realize its assets and discharge its
     liabilities in other than the normal course of business and at amounts
     differing from those reflected in the consolidated financial statements.
     Management plans to obtain sufficient working capital from operations and
     external financing to meet the Company's liabilities and commitments as
     they become payable over the next twelve months. There can be no assurance
     that management's plans will be successful. Failure to obtain sufficient
     working capital from operations and external financing will cause the
     Company to curtail operations. These consolidated financial statements do
     not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
     uncertainty.


     b) Principal Business Activities

     Thinkpath Inc. is an engineering services company which, along with its
     wholly-owned subsidiaries, Thinkpath US Inc. (formerly Cad Cam Inc.),
     Thinkpath Michigan Inc. (formerly Cad Cam of Michigan Inc.), Thinkpath
     Technical Services Inc. (formerly Cad Cam Technical Services Inc.) and The
     Multitech Group Inc. provides engineering, design, technical publications
     and staffing services to enhance the resource performance of clients. In
     addition, the Company owns 100% (unless otherwise noted) of the following
     companies which are currently inactive: Systemsearch Consulting Services
     Inc., International Career Specialists Ltd., Microtech Professionals Inc.,
     E-Wink Inc. (80%), Thinkpath Training Inc. (formerly ObjectArts Inc.),
     Thinkpath Training US Inc. (formerly ObjectArts US Inc.), TidalBeach Inc.
     and TBM Technologies Inc.


                                      -9-
<PAGE>

THINKPATH INC.
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT MARCH 31, 2007
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)


     c) Basis of consolidated financial statement presentation

     The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company
     and its controlled subsidiaries. The earnings of the subsidiaries are
     included from the date of acquisition for acquisitions accounted for using
     the purchase method. For subsidiaries acquired prior to June 30, 2001 and
     accounted for by the pooling of interest method, earnings have been
     included for all periods reported. All significant inter-company accounts
     and transactions have been eliminated.

     d) Cash and Cash Equivalents

     Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts from and to banks,
     and any other highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of three
     months or less. The carrying amounts approximate fair values because of the
     short maturity of those instruments.

     e) Other Financial Instruments

     The carrying amounts of the Company's other financial instruments
     approximate fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments
     or the current nature of interest rates borne by these instruments.

     f) Long-Term Financial Instruments

     The fair value of each of the Company's long-term financial assets and debt
     instruments is based on the amount of future cash flows associated with
     each instrument discounted using an estimate of what the Company's current
     borrowing rate for similar instruments of comparable maturity would be.

     g) Property and Equipment

     Property and equipment are recorded at cost and are amortized over the
     estimated useful lives of the assets principally using the declining
     balance method.

     The Company's policy is to record leases, which transfer substantially all
     benefits and risks incidental to ownership of property, as acquisition of
     property and equipment and to record the occurrences of corresponding
     obligations as long-term liabilities. Obligations under capital leases are
     reduced by rental payments net of imputed interest.

     h) Net Income (Loss) and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Weighted Average
     Common Stock

     Net income (Loss) per common stock is computed by dividing net income
     (loss) for the year by the weighted average number of common stock
     outstanding during the year.

     Diluted net income (loss) per common stock is computed by dividing net
     income (loss) for the year by the weighted average number of common stock
     outstanding during the year, assuming that all convertible preferred stock,
     stock options and warrants as described in note 12 were converted or
     exercised. Stock conversions, stock options and warrants which are
     anti-dilutive are not included in the calculation of diluted net income
     (loss) per weighted average common stock.

     The outstanding options and warrants as detailed in note 12 were not
     included in the computation of the diluted earnings per common share as the
     effect would be anti-dilutive. The earnings per share calculation (basic
     and diluted) does not include any common stock for common stock payable, as
     the effect would be anti-dilutive.


     i) Revenue

     The Company recognizes revenue under engineering service contracts when a
     contract has been executed, the contract price is fixed and determinable,
     delivery of services or products has occurred, and collection of the
     contract price is considered probable and can be reasonably estimated.
     Revenue is earned under time-and-materials, fixed-price and cost-plus
     contracts.

                                      -10-
<PAGE>

THINKPATH INC.
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT MARCH 31, 2007
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)



     The Company recognizes revenue on time-and-materials contracts to the
     extent of billable rates times hours delivered, plus expenses incurred. For
     fixed price contracts within the scope of Statement of Position 81-1,
     Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type
     Contracts (SOP 81-1), revenue is recognized on the percentage of completion
     method using costs incurred in relation to total estimated costs or upon
     delivery of specific products or services, as appropriate. For fixed
     price-completion contracts that are not within the scope of SOP 81-1,
     revenue is generally recognized as earned according to contract terms as
     the service is provided. The Company provides its customers with a number
     of different services that are generally documented through separate
     negotiated task orders that detail the services to be provided and the
     compensation for these services. Services rendered under each task order
     represent an independent earnings process and are not dependent on any
     other service or product sold. The Company recognizes revenue on cost-plus
     contracts to the extent of allowable costs incurred plus a proportionate
     amount of the fee earned, which may be fixed or performance-based. The
     Company considers fixed fees under cost-plus contracts to be earned in
     proportion to the allowable costs incurred in performance of the contract,
     which generally corresponds to the timing of contractual billings. The
     Company records provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts in
     the period in which those losses are identified.

     The Company considers performance-based fees under any contract type to be
     earned only when it can demonstrate satisfaction of a specific performance
     goal or it receive contractual notification from a customer that the fee
     has been earned. In all cases, the Company recognizes revenue only when
     pervasive evidence of an arrangement exists services have been rendered,
     the contract price is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably
     assured.

     Contract revenue recognition inherently involves estimation. From time to
     time, facts develop that requires the Company to revise the total estimated
     costs or revenues expected. In most cases, these changes relate to changes
     in the contractual scope of the work, and do not significantly impact the
     expected profit rate on a contract. The Company records the cumulative
     effects of any revisions to the estimated total costs and revenues in the
     period in which the facts become known.

     j) Goodwill

     In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
     Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141, "Business
     Combinations" and No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." Under
     the new rules, goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are no
     longer amortized but are reviewed annually for impairment.

     Separable intangible assets that are not deemed to have an indefinite life
     will continue to be amortized over their useful lives. The amortization
     provisions of SFAS No. 142 apply to goodwill and intangible assets acquired
     after June 30, 2001. With respect to goodwill and intangible assets
     acquired prior to July 1, 2001, the Company began applying the new
     accounting rules effective January 1, 2002.

     At December 31, 2006, the Company recorded a charge of $2,043,496 for the
     impaired goodwill of the Technical Publications and Engineering unit based
     on reduced cash flow estimates.

     At December 31, 2005, the Company recorded a charge of $1,459,691 for the
     impaired goodwill of the Technical Publications and Engineering unit based
     on reduced cash flow estimates.

     On an ongoing basis, absent any impairment indicators, the Company will
     perform a goodwill impairment test as of the end of the fourth quarter of
     every year.

     k) Income Taxes

     The Company accounts for income tax under the provision of SFAS No. 109,
     which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the
     expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the
     financial statement or tax returns.

     Deferred income taxes are provided using the liability method. Under the
     liability method, deferred income taxes are recognized for all significant
     temporary differences between the tax and financial statement bases of
     assets and liabilities.

     Effects of changes in enacted tax laws on deferred tax assets and
     liabilities are reflected as adjustments to tax expense in the period of
     enactment. Deferred tax assets may be reduced, if deemed necessary based on
     a judgmental assessment of available evidence, by a valuation allowance for
     the amount of any tax benefits which are more likely, based on current
     circumstances, not expected to be realized.

                                      -11-
<PAGE>
THINKPATH INC.
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT MARCH 31, 2007
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)



     l)  Foreign Currency

     The Company is a foreign private issuer and maintains its books and records
     of its Canadian companies in Canadian dollars (their functional currency).
     The financial statements of the Canadian companies are converted to US
     dollars as the Company has elected to report in US dollars consistent with
     Regulation S-X, Rule 3-20. The translation method used is the current rate
     method which is the method mandated by SFAS No. 52 where the functional
     currency is the foreign currency. Under the current method all assets and
     liabilities are translated at the current rate, stockholders' equity
     accounts are translated at historical rates and revenues and expenses are
     translated at average rates for the year.

     Due to the fact that items in the financial statements are being translated
     at different rates according to their nature, a translation adjustment is
     created. This translation adjustment has been included in accumulated other
     comprehensive income. Gains and losses on foreign currency transactions are
     included in financial expenses.


     m)  Use of Estimates

     The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with
     generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America
     requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain
     reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent
     assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements
     and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
     period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and these
     differences could be material. Estimates are used when recording accruals
     of expenses and revenue, allowance for doubtful accounts, and valuations of
     long-lived assets, goodwill and convertible financing derivatives. These
     estimates are reviewed periodically and as adjustments become necessary,
     they are reported in earnings in the period in which they become known.

     n) Long-Lived Assets

     On January 1, 1996, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 121,
     "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived
     Assets to be Disposed of". SFAS No. 121 requires that long-lived assets
     held and used by an entity be reviewed for impairment whenever events or
     changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may
     not be recoverable. Management used its best estimate of the undiscounted
     cash flows to evaluate the carrying amount and have reflected the
     impairment.

     In August 2001, FASB issued SFAS 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or
     Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." SFAS No. 144 addresses financial accounting
     and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. The
     Company adopted SFAS No. 144, effective January 1, 2002. The adoption of
     SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of
     operations or financial condition.

     o) Comprehensive Income

     In 1999, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 130 "Reporting
     Comprehensive Income". This standard requires companies to disclose
     comprehensive income in their financial statements. In addition to items
     included in net income, comprehensive income includes items currently
     charged or credited directly to stockholders' equity, such as the changes
     in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of securities and foreign
     currency translation adjustments.

     p) Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

     Effective January 1, 2006, the Company's stock based employee compensation
     plans are accounted for in accordance with the recognition and measurement
     provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("FAS") No. 123
     (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment ("FAS 123(R)"). See note 3 (c) for
     further details.

     q) Leases

     Leases are classified as either capital or operating. Those leases that
     transfer substantially all the benefits and risks of ownership of property
     to the Company are accounted for as capital leases. All other leases are
     accounted for as operating leases.

     Capital leases are accounted for as assets and are fully amortized on a
     straight-line basis over the lesser of the period of expected use of the
     assets or the lease term. Commitments to repay the principal amounts
     arising under capital lease obligations are included in current liabilities
     to the extent that the amount is repayable within one year, otherwise the
     principal is included in long term debt obligations. The capitalized lease
     obligation reflects the present value of future lease payments. The
     financing element of the lease payments is charged to interest expense in
     the consolidated statement of operations over the term of the lease.
     Operating lease costs are charged to administrative expense in the
     consolidated statement of operations on a straight-line basis.

                                      -12-
<PAGE>
THINKPATH INC.
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT MARCH 31, 2007
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)



     r) Recent Pronouncements

     In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement No. 154, "Accounting Changes and
     Error Corrections", applying to all voluntary accounting principle changes
     as well as the accounting for and reporting of such changes. SFAS No. 154
     requires voluntary changes in accounting principle be retrospectively
     applied to financial statements from previous periods unless such
     application is impracticable. SFAS No. 154 requires that changes in
     depreciation, amortization, or depletion methods for long-lived,
     non-financial assets must be accounted for as a change in accounting
     estimate due to a change in accounting principle. By enhancing the
     consistency of financial information between periods, the requirements of
     FASB 154 improves financial reporting. FASB 154 replaces APB Opinion No. 20
     and FASB 3. FASB 154 carries forward many provisions of Opinion 20 and FASB
     3 without change including those provisions related to reporting a change
     in accounting estimate, a change in reporting entity, correction of an
     error and reporting accounting changes in interim financial statements.
     FASB 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made
     in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005.

     In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, "Accounting for Certain
     Hybrid Financial Instruments" ("SFAS 155"). SFAS 155 allows any hybrid
     financial instrument that contains an embedded derivatives that otherwise
     would require bifurcation under SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
     Instruments and Hedging Activities" to be carried at fair value in its
     entirety, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. In addition,
     SFAS 155 requires that beneficial interests in securitized financial assets
     be analyzed to determine whether they are freestanding derivatives or
     contain an embedded derivative. SFAS 155 also eliminates a prior
     restriction on the types of passive derivatives that a qualifying special
     purpose entity is permitted to hold. SFAS 155 is applicable to new or
     modified financial instruments in fiscal years beginning after September
     15, 2006, though the provisions related to fair value accounting for hybrid
     financial instruments can also be applied to existing instruments. Early
     adoption, as of the beginning of an entity's fiscal year, is also
     permitted, provided interim financial statements have not yet been issued.
     The company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, that the
     adoption of SFAS 155 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

     In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 156, "Accounting for Servicing of
     Financial Assets-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140". This statement
     amends FASB Statement No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
     Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities", with respect to the
     accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing
     liabilities. This statement: (1) requires an entity to recognize a
     servicing asset or servicing liability each time it undertakes an
     obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing
     contract in any of the following situations: (a) a transfer of the
     servicer's financial assets that meets the requirements for sale
     accounting, (b) a transfer of the servicer's financial assets to a
     qualifying special-purpose entity in a guaranteed mortgage securitization
     in which the transferor retains all of the resulting securities and
     classifies them as either available-for-sale securities or trading
     securities in accordance with FASB Statement No. 115, "Accounting for
     Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities", (c) an acquisition or
     assumption of an obligation to service a financial asset that does not
     relate to financial assets of the servicer or its consolidated affiliates;
     (2) requires all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing
     liabilities to be initially measured at fair value, if practicable; (3)
     permits an entity to choose either of the following subsequent measurement
     methods for each class of separately recognized servicing assets and
     servicing liabilities: (a) Amortization method-Amortize servicing assets or
     servicing liabilities in proportion to and over the period of estimated net
     servicing income or net servicing loss and assess servicing assets or
     servicing liabilities for impairment or increased obligation based on fair
     value at each reporting date, or (b) Fair value measurement method-Measure
     servicing assets or servicing liabilities at fair value at each reporting
     date and report changes in fair value in earnings in the period in which
     the changes occur; (4) at its initial adoption, permits a one-time
     reclassification of available-for-sale securities to trading securities by
     entities with recognized servicing rights, without calling into question
     the treatment of other available-for-sale securities under Statement 115,
     provided that the available-for-sale securities are identified in some
     manner as offsetting the entity's exposure to changes in fair value of
     servicing assets or servicing liabilities that a servicer elects to
     subsequently measure at fair value; and (5) requires separate presentation
     of servicing assets and servicing liabilities subsequently measured at fair
     value in the statement of financial position and additional disclosures for
     all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. An
     entity should adopt this statement as of the beginning of its first fiscal
     year that begins after September 15, 2006. Earlier adoption is permitted as
     of the beginning of an entity's fiscal year, provided the entity has not
     yet issued financial statements, including interim financial statements,
     for any period of that fiscal year. The effective date of this Statement is
     the date an entity adopts the requirements of this statement.


     In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB
     Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an
     interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109" (FIN 48), which clarifies the
     accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. This Interpretation requires
     that we recognize in our financial statements the benefit of a tax position
     if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based
     on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN 48 become
     effective as of the beginning of our 2008 fiscal year, with the cumulative
     effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to
     opening retained earnings. The company is currently evaluating the impact
     that FIN 48 will have on its financial statements.


                                      -13-
<PAGE>
THINKPATH INC.
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT MARCH 31, 2007
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)


     In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, "Fair Value
     Measurements" (FAS 157), which defines fair value, establishes a framework
     for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value
     measurements. The provisions of FAS 157 become effective as of the
     beginning of the 2009 fiscal year. The company is currently evaluating the
     impact that FAS 157 will have on its financial statements.


      In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff
     Accounting Bulletin No. 108, "Considering the Effects of Prior Year
     Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
     Statements" (SAB 108), which addresses how to quantify the effect of
     financial statement errors. The provisions of SAB 108 become effective as
     of the end of the 2007 fiscal year. The company does not expect the
     adoption of SAB 108 to have a significant impact on its financial
     statements.


     In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 158, "Employers'
     Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans"
     ("SFAS 158") which requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or
     underfunded status of a defined benefit plan as an asset or liability in
     its consolidated balance sheet. Under SFAS 158, actuarial gains and losses
     and prior service costs or credits that have not yet been recognized
     through earnings as net periodic benefit cost will be recognized in other
     comprehensive income, net of tax, until they are amortized as a component
     of net periodic benefit cost. SFAS 158 is effective as of the end of the
     fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006 and shall not be applied
     retrospectively. The company is currently evaluating the impact that the
     adoption of SFAS 158 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

     In December 2006, the FASB issued FSP EITF 00-19-2, "Accounting for
     Registration Payment Arrangements." This FASB Staff Position ("FSP")
     addresses an issuer's accounting for registration payment arrangements.
     This FSP specifies that the contingent obligation to make future payments
     or otherwise transfer consideration under a registration payment
     arrangement, whether issued as a separate agreement or included as a
     provision of a financial instrument or other agreement, should be
     separately recognized and measured in accordance with FASB Statement No. 5,
     Accounting for Contingencies. The guidance in this FSP amends FASB
     Statements No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
     Activities , and No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
     Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity , and FASB Interpretation
     No. 45, Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees,
     Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others , to include scope
     exceptions for registration payment arrangements. This FSP further
     clarifies that a financial instrument subject to a registration payment
     arrangement should be accounted for in accordance with other applicable
     generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") without regard to the
     contingent obligation to transfer consideration pursuant to the
     registration payment arrangement. This FSP is effective immediately for
     registration payment arrangements and the financial instruments subject to
     those arrangements that are entered into or modified subsequent to the date
     of issuance of this FSP.


     For registration payment arrangements and financial instruments subject to
     those arrangements that were entered into prior to the issuance of this
     FSP, this guidance shall be effective for financial statements issued for
     fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, and interim periods within
     those fiscal years. Early adoption of this FSP for interim or annual
     periods for which financial statements or interim reports have not been
     issued is permitted. Early adoption of this FSP for interim or annual
     periods for which financial statements or interim reports have not been
     issued is permitted.


     In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, "The Fair Value Option
     for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of
     FASB Statement No. 115" (FAS 159). FAS 159 permits companies to choose to
     measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value
     that are not currently required to be measured at fair value and
     establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate
     comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes
     for similar types of assets and liabilities. The provisions of FAS 159
     become effective as of the beginning of the 2008 fiscal year. The company
     is currently evaluating the impact that FAS 159 will have on its financial
     statements.

     s) Advertising Costs

     Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.


                                      -14-
<PAGE>
THINKPATH INC.
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT MARCH 31, 2007
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)




     3.      STOCK OPTION PLANS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                              WEIGHTED AVERAGE
                                                                   OPTIONS      EXERCISE PRICE
                                                                   -------      --------------

<S>                                                          <C>                      <C>
     a)  Options outstanding at December 31, 2005                1,864,659                $.19
                                                                 =========
          Options forfeited during the year                       (25,000)               $0.27
          Options expired during the year                             (87)              $3,470
          Options granted during the year                               --
                                                                        --
          Options outstanding at December 31, 2006               1,839,572                $.19
                                                                 =========
          Options forfeited during the period                           --
          Options expired during the period                             --
          Options granted during the period                             --
                                                                        --
          Options outstanding at March 31, 2007                  1,839,572                $.19
                                                                 =========


          Options exercisable December 31, 2006                  1,839,572                $.19
          Options exercisable March 31, 2007                     1,839,572                $.19
          Options available for future grant December 31, 2006     162,102
          Options available for future grant March 31, 2007        162,102
</TABLE>



     b) Range of Exercise Prices at March 31, 2007

              OUTSTANDING    WEIGHTED AVERAGE        OPTIONS   WEIGHTED AVERAGE
                  OPTIONS      REMAINING LIFE    EXERCISABLE     EXERCISE PRICE
                  -------      --------------    -----------   ----------------


     $0.01      1,839,572                8.57     1,839,572               $0.19



     c) Change in Accounting Policy and Pro-forma net income

     At December 31, 2006, the Company has five stock-based employee
     compensation plans, which are described more fully in note 12(d). Effective
     January 1, 2006, the Company's plans are accounted for in accordance with
     the recognition and measurement provisions of Statement of Financial
     Accounting Standards ("FAS") No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
     ("FAS 123(R)"), which replaces FAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
     Compensation, and supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion ("APB")
     No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related
     interpretations. FAS 123(R) requires compensation costs related to
     share-based payment transactions, including employee stock options, to be
     recognized in the financial statements. In addition, the Company adheres to
     the guidance set forth within Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")
     Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 107, which provides the Staff's views
     regarding the interaction between SFAS No. 123(R) and certain SEC rules and
     regulations and provides interpretations with respect to the valuation of
     share-based payments for public companies.

     Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for similar transactions in
     accordance with APB No. 25 which employed the intrinsic value method of
     measuring compensation cost. Accordingly, compensation expense was not
     recognized for fixed stock options if the exercise price of the option
     equaled or exceeded the fair value of the underlying stock at the grant
     date.

                                      -15-
<PAGE>

THINKPATH INC.
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT MARCH 31, 2007
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)


     While FAS No. 123 encouraged recognition of the fair value of all
     stock-based awards on the date of grant as expense over the vesting period,
     companies were permitted to continue to apply the intrinsic value-based
     method of accounting prescribed by APB No. 25 and disclose certain
     pro-forma amounts as if the fair value approach of SFAS No. 123 had been
     applied. In December 2002, FAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
     Compensation-Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of SFAS No. 123, was
     issued, which, in addition to providing alternative methods of transition
     for a voluntary change to the fair value method of accounting for
     stock-based employee compensation, required more prominent pro-forma
     disclosures in both the annual and interim financial statements. The
     Company complied with these disclosure requirements for all applicable
     periods prior to January 1, 2006.

     In adopting FAS 123(R), the Company applied the modified prospective
     approach to transition. Under the modified prospective approach, the
     provisions of FAS 123(R) are to be applied to new awards and to awards
     modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the required effective date.
     Additionally, compensation cost for the portion of awards for which the
     requisite service has not been rendered that are outstanding as of the
     required effective date shall be recognized as the requisite service is
     rendered on or after the required effective date. The compensation cost for
     that portion of awards shall be based on the grant-date fair value of those
     awards as calculated for either recognition or pro-forma disclosures under
     FAS 123.

     There was no stock compensation expense for employee options recorded under
     FAS 123(R) in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three
     months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. There was no stock compensation
     expense for employee options recorded under APB No. 25 in the Consolidated
     Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
     2006.

     The Company previously accounted for options granted to its non-employee
     consultants using the fair value cost in accordance with FAS 123 and EITF
     No. 96-18. The adoption of FAS 123(R) and SAB 107 as of January 1, 2006,
     had no material impact on the accounting for non-employee awards. The
     Company continues to consider the additional guidance set forth in EITF
     Issue No. 96-18, "Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to
     Other Than Employees" ("EITF 96-18").

     There was no stock compensation expense related to non-employee options for
     the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.

     On February 28, 2007, the exercise price of 379,572 options issued to
     Laurus Master Fund, Ltd on June 27, 2005 was amended from $.0001 to $0.01
     per share. The options are exercisable at any time and in any amount and
     expire on June 27, 2015.

     There have been no options granted since 2005.


4.     ACQUISITIONS

     On June 30, 2006, the Company acquired The Multitech Group Inc. (TMG), an
     engineering services firm located in New Jersey, effective April 1, 2006.
     The purchase price of $2,798,750 was based on five times the audited 2005
     EBIT of TMG and was payable as follows: thirty percent in cash for a total
     of $839,625; twenty per cent in a two year subordinated note of $559,750
     bearing annual interest at US prime, payable quarterly and guaranteed by
     the Company; twenty-five per cent in the Company's common shares for a
     total consideration of $699,688 or 3,369,188 common shares; and,
     twenty-five per cent in the Company's preferred shares for a total
     consideration of $669,688 or 700 preferred shares which will be convertible
     into common shares after June 30, 2007. The acquisition was accounted for
     by the purchase method and the operations have been included in the
     consolidated operations from April 1, 2006.

     The net acquired assets were valued as follows:

     Current assets                                                  $965,977
     Property and equipment                                           378,715
     Cash surrender value of life insurance                            13,291
     Customer lists                                                   123,934
     Contracts                                                        489,294
     Liabilities assumed                                            (762,933)
                                                                    ---------
                                                                    1,208,278

     Less: consideration including acquisition costs                3,103,540
                                                                    ---------

     Goodwill                                                      $1,895,262
                                                                   ==========

     At December 31, 2006, the Company wrote off the goodwill of $1,895,262
     allocated to the acquisition of TMG, for impairment based on reduced cash
     flow estimates.


                                      -16-
<PAGE>
THINKPATH INC.
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT MARCH 31, 2007
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)




5.     ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
                                                    3/31/07            12/31/06
                                                    -------            --------
                                                          $                   $
     Accounts receivable                          2,965,542           2,366,916
     Less:  Allowance for doubtful accounts       (201,032)           (216,503)
                                                  ---------           ---------
                                                  2,764,510           2,150,413
                                                  =========           =========

     Allowance for doubtful accounts
     Balance, beginning of period                   216,503             201,876
     Provision                                        5,921              92,662
     Recoveries                                    (21,392)            (78,035)
                                                   --------            --------
     Balance, end of period                         201,032             216,503
                                                    =======             =======



6.      PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 3/31/07                         12/31/06
                                                    ----------------------------------------    ----------

                                                                   ACCUMULATED
                                                         COST     AMORTIZATION          NET           NET
                                                            $                $            $             $
<S>                                                   <C>              <C>           <C>           <C>
     Furniture and equipment                          215,002          161,563       53,439        56,997
     Computer equipment and software                4,015,605        3,533,198      482,407       518,130
     Leasehold improvements                            45,091           34,595       10,495        15,156
     Automobile                                        43,425           43,425           --            --
                                                       ------           ------      -------       -------
                                                    4,319,123        3,772,781      546,342       590,283
                                                    =========        =========      =======       =======

     Property and equipment
      under capital lease included in the above       126,092           97,008       29,084        37,105
                                                      =======           ======       ======        ======
</TABLE>


     Amortization of property and equipment for the three months ended March 31,
     2007 amounted to $56,894, including amortization of property and equipment
     under capital lease of $8,022.

     Amortization of property and equipment for the year ended December 31, 2006
     amounted to $312,189, including amortization of property and equipment
     under capital lease of $25,759.



7.      GOODWILL

     Goodwill is the excess of cost over the value of assets acquired over
     liabilities assumed in the purchase of the subsidiaries. Goodwill has been
     allocated to reporting units as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               3/31/07     12/31/06
                                                                               -------     --------
                                                                 ACCUMULATED
                                                  ACCUMULATED     IMPAIRMENT
                                           COST  AMORTIZATION         LOSSES         NET          NET
                                      ---------- ------------- -------------- ---------- ------------
                                              $             $              $          $            $
<S>                                <C>                 <C>          <C>        <C>          <C>
     Technical Publications &
     Engineering (Thinkpath US Inc.,
     TBM Technologies Inc. and The
     Multitech Group Inc.)            7,851,142       535,164      4,956,660  2,359,318    2,359,318
                                      ---------       -------      ---------  ---------    ---------
</TABLE>


     Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and
     Other Intangible Assets". This statement requires the Company to evaluate
     the carrying value of goodwill and intangible assets based on assumptions
     and estimates of fair value and future cash flow information. These
     assumptions reflect management's best estimates and may differ from actual
     results. If different assumptions and estimates are used, carrying values
     could be adversely impacted, resulting in write downs that could adversely
     affect the Company's earnings.

     On an ongoing basis, absent any impairment indicators, the Company expects
     to perform a goodwill impairment test as of the end of the fourth quarter
     of every year.

     Effective April 1, 2006, the Company acquired goodwill in the amount of
     $1,895,262 in connection to its acquisition of TMG (note 4) which has been
     allocated to the Technical Publications and Engineering reporting unit.

                                      -17-
<PAGE>

THINKPATH INC.
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT MARCH 31, 2007
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)


     At December 31, 2006, the Company performed its annual impairment test for
     goodwill by first comparing the carrying value of the net assets to the
     fair value of the Technical Publications and Engineering unit. The fair
     value was determined to be less than the carrying value, and therefore a
     second step was performed to compute the amount of the impairment. In this
     process, a fair value for goodwill was estimated, based in part on the fair
     value of the operations, and was compared to its carrying value. The
     shortfall of the fair value below carrying value was $2,043,496 which
     represents the amount of goodwill impairment.



8.    OTHER ASSETS
                                                         3/31/07      12/31/06
                                                         -------      --------
                                                               $             $

     Cash surrender value of life insurance                   --            --
     Deferred Financing Costs                            191,061       209,559
     Customer Lists                                       82,620        92,949
                                                          ------        ------

     Total                                               273,681       302,508
                                                         =======       =======

     Included in Other Assets are deferred financing costs related to the Laurus
     Convertible Financing Facility to be amortized over the three-year term of
     the debt, beginning July 1, 2005. Also included in Other Assets are
     customer lists related to the acquisition of The Multitech Group Inc. (note
     4) to be amortized over three years, beginning April 1, 2006.

     Amortization of other assets for the three months ended March 31, 2007
     amounted to $46,356. Amortization of other assets for the year ended
     December 31, 2006 amounted to $322,630.

     Previously included in Other Assets were contracts related to the
     acquisition of the The Multitech Group Inc. (note 4) which were being
     amortized over two years. At December 31, 2006, the contracts asset balance
     in the amount of $305,811 was determined to be impaired and written off.
     During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company received cash of
     $77,594 on the surrender value of life insurance policies held on two
     employees.



9.   LAURUS REVOLVING NOTE (CONVERTIBILE FINANCING) FACILITY

     On June 27, 2005, the Company closed a $3,500,000 convertible financing
     facility with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. ("Laurus"). The facility consisted
     of a secured convertible note ("Minimum Borrowing Note") based on 90% of
     eligible accounts receivable which matured on June 27, 2008 and bore
     interest at an annual rate equal to The Wall Street Journal prime rate plus
     3% ("contract rate") but never less than 8%. At closing, the Company
     received $2,100,000 in proceeds from the facility based on its eligible
     accounts receivable ("formula amount") and an additional $1,000,000
     ("overadvance") granted in excess of the formula amount. The overadvance
     bore interest at the prime rate as published by the Wall Street Journal
     plus 2% and held an expiration date of December 27, 2005. In the event that
     the overadvance was not repaid in full by this date, the interest rate was
     to increase by an additional 1% per month.

     Laurus had the option to convert into common stock at anytime all or any
     portion of the principal and interest and fees payable at a fixed
     conversion price as follows:

          -    first $1,000,000 in principal convertible at a fixed price of
               $0.40 (80% of the average price for 10 days prior to closing of
               debt);
          -    next $1,000,000 in principal convertible at a fixed price of
               $0.50 (100% of the average price for 10 days prior to closing of
               debt);
          -    and, any remaining principal convertible at a fixed price of
               $0.53 (105% of the average price for 10 days prior to closing of
               debt).

     Should the Company complete a subsequent financing at a lower price than
     the original issue, the conversion prices of the three tranches above would
     be adjusted to 80%, 100% and 105% of the new lower price. This feature
     would modify the number of shares that the Company would issue on
     conversion of the notes.

     The Company had the option of prepaying the note at any time by paying to
     the holder a sum of money equal to 130% of the principal amount of the
     note.

                                      -18-
<PAGE>
THINKPATH INC.
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT MARCH 31, 2007
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)



     In connection with the financing, the Company issued warrants to purchase
     up to 2,100,000 shares of its common stock with 1,050,000 at an exercise
     price of $0.55 per share and 1,050,000 at an exercise price of $0.60 per
     share. The warrants vested immediately and expire on June 27, 2011. The
     Company also issued options to purchase up to 379,572 shares of its common
     stock, no par value per share, at an exercise price of $.0001 per share.
     The options vested immediately and expire on June 27, 2015. On February 28,
     2007 the option price was amended from $0.0001 per share to $0.01 per
     share.

     The financing included a Registration Rights Agreement which prescribes
     that the Company shall have caused a registration statement to be filed
     with the SEC, in respect of the securities covered by the Minimum Borrowing
     Note, Warrants and Options within 30 days of closing and to cause the
     registrations to become effective within 90 days of closing. In the event
     that the Company failed to file such registration statement, the agreement
     also provided that the Company shall pay liquidated damages and interest to
     Laurus.

     The Company determined that the conversion option embedded in the note and
     the warrants and options attached to the note qualify as embedded
     derivatives under the guidance of SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
     Instruments and Hedging Activities" and EITF Issue No. 00-19, "Accounting
     for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled
     in, a Company's Own Stock" and as such should be accounted for separately
     at inception at their fair value and subsequently marked to market. The
     total of the embedded derivatives was separated from the debt based on the
     initial amount of $3,100,000. The initial value of the derivatives and
     "embedded derivatives" is offset against the Laurus financing and is being
     amortized over a 3-year period subject to the expected availability. The
     conversion right and interest adjustment clause found in the note were
     considered one embedded derivative and the warrants and options were each
     considered separate derivatives.

     As the embedded derivatives were not standard and are not publicly quoted,
     a combination of Black-Scholes methodologies and Monte Carlo simulations
     were used. Valuations were performed at each quarter end and the conversion
     option, warrants and options were each valued separately. For the valuation
     as of December 31, 2006 an assumption of 100% volatility was used and for
     the valuation at March 31, 2007, an assumption of 94.65% volatility was
     used.

     CONVERSION OPTION
     As the issue was a floating rate note, it was inferred that it would
     substantially always be equal to par ($3,100,000 USD). The implied number
     of conversion options would be derived by dividing the notional by the
     average conversion price. As shown in the table below, the conversion price
     was calculated using the weighted average conversion price for each
     tranche. This option was valued using a standard Black-Scholes model.

                                                                  WEIGHTED
             TRANCHE          NOTIONAL      CONVERSION PRICE       AVERAGE
             -------          --------      ----------------       -------
            Tranche 1         1,000,000            0.4             0.1290
            Tranche 2         1,000,000            0.5             0.1613
            Tranche 3         1,100,000           0.53             0.1881
                              -----------                      ---------------
              Total           3,100,000                            0.4784
                              ===========                      ===============

     The interest rate adjustment clause contained in the conversion option set
     that if the stock price exceeded the prevailing conversion price by a
     certain level, interest payments on the floating rate note would be
     reduced. This clause diminished the conversion options fair value as the
     holder would be penalized when the conversion option was in the money. The
     fair value for this clause is dependant on the expected behaviour of the
     prime rate and the Company's stock price. This clause was valued using a
     Monte Carlo simulation model using a mean reversion process to simulate the
     prime rate and a standard Geometric Brownian motion process for the
     Company's stock price.

     The 8% floor on interest rate clause contained in the conversion option was
     valued using a Monte Carlo simulation model with a mean reversion process
     to simulate the prime rate. As the value of the floor option was determined
     to be relatively insignificant ($29,000 liability as of December 31, 2005
     and $500 liability as of June 30, 2006 representing an impact on the fair
     value of 0.2% and .015% respectively for the valuations), it was ignored in
     the valuation of the conversion option. The 5% limitation upon issuance of
     shares was ignored in this valuation based on the assumption that it is a
     liquidity feature that would not significantly impact the valuation.

     WARRANTS AND OPTIONS
     Valuation of the warrants and options were performed separately using
     standard Black-Scholes methodology. As the Company would be required to
     issue new shares for these instruments it used a valuation with a dilution
     effect.

                                      -19-
<PAGE>
THINKPATH INC.
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT MARCH 31, 2007
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)



     AMENDMENTS
     On December 8, 2005, the Company and Laurus entered into an amendment of
     the Security Agreement pursuant to which Laurus agreed to waive (i) any
     event of default by the Company relating to the Company's non-payment of
     any liquidated damages associated with its non-filing of its Registration
     Statement and (ii) any liquidated damages associated with its non-filing of
     its Registration Statement that had accrued and were due and payable as of
     the date of December 8, 2005. In addition, the filing and effective dates
     for the Registration Statement were extended to January 31, 2006 and March
     30, 2006, respectively.

     The Company failed to file and cause to be effective a registration
     statement by March 30, 2006. Laurus agreed to waive the event of default
     and associated liquidated damages and to extend the filing deadline until
     July 1, 2006.

     On January 26, 2006, the Company and Laurus executed an Overadvance Side
     Letter whereby Laurus increased the overadvance amount on the revolving
     note to $1,200,000 ("Second Overadvance"). The second overadvance bore
     interest at the prime rate as published by the Wall Street Journal plus 2%.
     The second overadvance was to expire on July 27, 2006. In the event that
     the overadvance was not repaid in full by this date, the interest rate was
     to be increased by an additional 1% per month. In consideration of the
     Second Overadvance, the Company issued 500,000 additional common stock
     purchase warrants with an exercise price of $0.01 per share which expire on
     January 26, 2012. Using the standard Black-Scholes methodology, these
     warrants were valued to be $98,588 which is being offset against the Laurus
     financing and is being amortized over the remaining term of the debt. On
     March 30, 2007, the expiration date of these warrants was amended to
     January 26, 2026.

     On June 30, 2006, Laurus modified the terms of the convertible financing
     facility and removed the convertibility option, the interest adjustment
     clause and the conversion adjustment clause. In addition, the Registration
     Rights Agreement was modified so that the liquidated damages that may be
     charged for failure to file a registration statement at 2% per day shall no
     longer exceed 20% of the total debt owed to Laurus. Further, the
     Registration Rights Agreement was modified such that there must be an
     effective registration statement for the common stock issued upon the
     exercise of options and warrants since the convertibility option has been
     removed.

     The Company evaluated the modifications to the convertible financing
     facility under EITF Issue No. 96-19, "Debtor's Accounting for a
     Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments" and EITF Issue No. 05-07,
     "Accounting for Modifications to Conversion Options Embedded in Debt
     Instruments and Related Issues". ETIF Issue No. 96-19 requires the debtor
     to determine whether the present value of the cash flows, including changes
     in the fair value of an embedded conversion option upon modification of a
     convertible debt instrument, under the terms of the new debt instrument is
     at least 10% different from the present value of the remaining cash flows
     under the terms of the original instrument. Moreover, this EITF specifies
     that changes in the fair value of embedded conversion options should be
     incorporated in this analysis. This is reiterated in EITF Issue No. 05-7.
     Using the methodology proposed in EITF Issue No. 96-19, the fair value as
     of June 30, 2006 of the embedded conversion option was $388,264 (value of
     the embedded conversion option less value of the interest adjustment
     clause) and the present value of the "old" and "new" financing was
     $1,726,425 and $1,451,862 respectively. The Company concluded that the
     difference in cash flows was 16% and therefore that the "old" financing was
     extinguished.

     EITF Issue No. 96-19 requires that the new debt be recorded at fair value
     and that amount should be used to determine the debt extinguishment gain or
     loss to be recognized and effective rate of the new debt. Using an
     effective rate of 20%, the fair value of the new facility was determined to
     be $2,351,271 which results in a loss of $689,858 on extinguishment of debt
     based on the book value of the old facility of $1,661,413. This loss was
     included in financing costs at December 31, 2006 in the consolidated
     statement of operations.

     As the conversion right of the convertible financing facility was
     eliminated, the entire embedded derivative pertaining to the conversion
     option was reversed, resulting in a gain of $388,264. This gain was
     included in financing costs at December 31, 2006 in the consolidated
     statement of operations.

     The Company also evaluated the modifications to the Registration Rights
     Agreement, specifically the 2% liquidated damages clause under EITF Issue
     No. 00-19 to determine whether the warrants and options issued with the
     debt should be reclassed into equity from liabilities. According to EITF
     Issue No. 00-19, paragraph 16 "If a settlement alternative includes a
     penalty that would be avoided by a company under other settlement
     alternatives, the uneconomic settlement alternative should be disregarded
     in classifying the contract. In the case of delivery of unregistered
     shares, a discount from the value of the corresponding registered shares
     that is a reasonable estimate of the difference in fair values between
     registered and unregistered shares (that is, the discount reflects the fair
     value of the restricted shares determined using commercially reasonable
     means) is not considered a penalty."

     The Company concluded that the 20% cap added to the liquidated damages
     clause does not represent an economically reasonable difference between
     registered and unregistered shares as the cap is based on the notional
     amount of financing outstanding which no longer has a convertibility
     feature and therefore has no relation to the shares that could be issued
     upon the exercise of options and warrants. Moreover, the maximum potential
     penalty that could arise under this clause based on the total debt
     outstanding to Laurus at June 30, 2006 was approximately $980,000 which is
     significant as compared to the total value of the shares that could be
     issued under the outstanding warrants and options June 30, 2006 of
     approximately $960,000.

                                      -20-
<PAGE>
THINKPATH INC.
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT MARCH 31, 2007
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)


     Under the Security Agreement, the Company is also subject to a 2% penalty
     (with no cap) if its stock would stop trading for failure to make timely
     filings with the SEC. In consideration of this penalty, which could be
     interpreted as a form of net cash settlement, and the assessment of the
     liquidated damages clause, the Company concluded that the criteria for
     reclassification to equity in EITF 00-19 was not met and therefore the
     warrants and options would remain embedded derivatives.

     On November 15, 2006, the Company executed an Omnibus Amendment No. 1 with
     Laurus Master Fund, Inc., whereby Laurus agreed to postpone the December
     and January principal payments on the Term Note (note 12) to be paid
     instead on the Maturity Date of June 30, 2009. In addition, they agreed to
     increase the overadvance by $43,000 and extend the overadvance until
     December 31, 2007 with a repayment schedule beginning July 1, 2007. In
     consideration of these modifications, the Company issued 940,750 common
     stock purchase warrants to Laurus with an exercise price of $0.23 per share
     which expire on November 15, 2013. Laurus also agreed to waive any
     penalties for failure to file and effect a registration statement
     registering the shares underlying their common stock purchase warrants
     until March 1, 2007.

     The fair value of the warrants issued on November 15, 2006 was determined
     to be $190,848 and were allocated as follows: 368,904 warrants as
     compensation for the deferral of the two principal payments on the term
     loan ($74,839 in fair value) and 571,846 warrants for the increase in and
     extension of the over advance ($116,009 in fair value).

     The Company considered the additional modifications to the revolving credit
     facility and term loan and whether they should be accounted for under EITF
     96-19 or EITF 98-14. EITF 96-19 requires that modifications be evaluated by
     comparing the present value of the cash flows under the old debt with the
     present value of the cash flows under the new debt - both discounted at the
     effective interest rate of the old debt. The fair value of the additional
     warrants issued on the term loan ($74,839) is considered as a cash flow at
     inception of the new debt and as the difference was only 5% this
     modification was not considered an extinguishment of the old debt. As a
     result, there were no changes in the accounting required and the fair value
     of the additional warrants will be amortized over the remaining life of the
     term loan using the effective interest method.

     The revolving line of credit was modified such that the total borrowing
     capacity has been increased. Under EITF 98-14, the debtor should compare
     the product of the remaining term and the maximum available credit of the
     old arrangement with the borrowing capacity of the new arrangement. If the
     borrowing capacity of the new arrangement is greater than or equal to the
     borrowing capacity of the old arrangement, then any unamortized deferred
     costs, any fees paid to the creditor, and any third-party costs incurred
     should be associated with the new arrangement. Since the total borrowing
     capacity has increased as a result of the modifications, the fair value of
     the warrants associated with the overadvance would be deferred and
     amortized over the remaining term of the facility.

     In December 2006, the FASB issued FSP EITF 00-19-2, "Accounting for
     Registration Payment Arrangements." This FASB Staff Position ("FSP")
     addresses an issuer's accounting for registration payment arrangements.
     This FSP can significantly modify the accounting treatment for instruments
     that are subject to registration rights agreements such as the Company's
     warrants. The FSP essentially states that registration rights agreements
     that contain contingent obligations to make payments should be evaluated as
     a contingency under FAS 5. Furthermore, the FSP states that: "a financial
     instrument subject to a registration payment arrangement should be
     accounted for in accordance with other applicable generally accepted
     accounting principles (GAAP) without regard to the contingent obligation to
     transfer consideration pursuant to the registration payment arrangement."

     Prior to the application of this FSP, the Company determined the
     appropriate accounting for the warrants by considering both its ability to
     settle the warrants by issuing unregistered shares and to pay the
     liquidated damages. Considering both elements together, the Company
     concluded that because the registration rights agreement contained a 2% per
     month liquidated damages clause if the underlying shares were not
     registered with the SEC, that the provision of EITF 00-19 paragraph 14
     could not be met since it would be uneconomical to issue unregistered
     shares and to pay the penalty. Therefore, the warrants were considered
     liability instruments under EITF 00-19 and accounted for at fair value.

     Under the FSP, the Company had to evaluate whether the warrants could be
     settled in unregistered shares and that the 2% penalty payable in the event
     that the Company's shares are delisted is included in the scope of the FSP,
     then an impediment to classifying the warrants as equity instruments under
     FAS 133/EITF 00-19 would be removed. The next step in the analysis was to
     consider whether the warrants met the definition of a derivative under FAS
     133. In order for the warrants not to be considered an embedded derivative
     then they must a) be indexed to the Company's own stock and b) classified
     in stockholders' equity. The Company determined that since its functional
     currency is Canadian and the warrants are exercisable in US dollars, the
     warrants should be considered indexed to both the company's share price and
     the exchange rate. As the warrants do not qualify for the exemption in
     paragraph 11 (a) of FAS 133, they should continue to be recorded as
     liabilities at fair value, with the variations recorded in earnings.



                                      -21-
<PAGE>
THINKPATH INC.
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT MARCH 31, 2007
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)



     On February 28, 2007, the Company executed an Omnibus Amendment No. 2 with
     Laurus Master Fund, Inc., whereby Laurus amended the terms of the term loan
     (Note 11), increased the over advance to $1,690,000 and increased the
     stated amount of the revolver note to $3,650,000. The agreement also
     amended the exercise price of the options issued in June 2005 and the
     warrants issued in June 2006 from $0.0001 to $0.01. On March 21, 2007, the
     Company executed an Omnibus Amendment No. 3 with Laurus Master Fund, Inc.,
     whereby the revolver note was increased to $4,000,000. Any principal
     indebtedness outstanding on the revolver in excess of $3,650,000 will bear
     interest at an annual rate equal to The Wall Street Journal prime rate plus
     23% ("contract rate") but never less than 8%. In consideration of these
     modifications to the revolving facility, the Company issued 1,213,435
     common stock purchase warrants to Laurus with an exercise price of $0.01
     per share which expire on February 28, 2027.

     In accordance with EITF 98-14, the Company compared the product of the
     remaining term and the maximum available credit of the old arrangement with
     the borrowing capacity of the new arrangement. As the borrowing capacity of
     the new arrangement is greater than the borrowing capacity of the old
     arrangement, the fair value of the warrants associated with the revolver
     and over advance would be deferred and amortized over the remaining term of
     the facility.

     During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company amortized
     $115,655 of the initial value of the derivatives and embedded derivatives
     which are included in financing costs. During the year ended December 31,
     2006, the Company amortized $465,471 of the initial value of the
     derivatives and embedded derivatives which are included in financing costs.

     VALUATION RESULTS


         DERIVATIVE                           3/31/07          12/31/06
         ----------                           -------         ---------
         Warrants                            $730,889          $747,848
         Options                              $39,248           $69,455
                                              -------           -------
                                             $770,137          $817,303
                                             ========          ========

     The mark to market of the derivatives including the embedded derivatives at
     March 31, 2007 was credited to financing costs in the amount of $280,407.
     The mark to market of the derivatives including the embedded derivatives at
     the end of each period was credited to financing costs in the amount of
     $293,822.

     At the end of each period, the balance on the Laurus facility was as
     follows:

                                                        3/31/07        12/31/06
                                                        -------        --------
                                                              $               $
     Principal balance revolving note                 3,706,218       3,387,330
     Deferred Financing Costs                         (497,280)       (465,538)
                                                      ---------       ---------

     Total                                            3,208,938       2,921,792
                                                      =========       =========


10.  ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

     Included in accounts payable at the end of each period are the following:

                                                         3/31/07       12/31/06
                                                         -------       --------
                                                               $              $
     Trade payables                                      362,946        410,912
     Accrued payroll and payroll liabilities             626,421        369,455
     Accrued bonuses                                     104,927         75,987
     Accrued professional fees                           331,486        361,269
     Other                                               464,944        275,600
                                                         -------        -------

                                                       1,890,724      1,493,223
                                                       =========      =========


                                      -22-
<PAGE>

THINKPATH INC.
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT MARCH 31, 2007
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)


11.  LONG-TERM DEBT

     i) March 31, 2007

     On February 28, 2007, the Company executed an Omnibus Amendment No. 2 with
     Laurus Master Fund, Inc. (note 9), whereby Laurus agreed to postpone the
     March 2007 through to August 2007 principal payments with the postponed
     principal to be amortized equally over the remaining term of the loan
     beginning September 1, 2007. In addition, the exercise price of the
     warrants issued with the loan in June 2006 was amended from $0.0001to $0.01
     per share. In consideration of these modifications, the Company issued
     warrants to purchase up to 1,213,435 shares of the Company's common stock
     at $0.01 per share. The warrants expire on February 28, 2027.

     The warrants were valued at February 28, 2007 using standard Black-Scholes
     methodology with a dilution effect and determined to have a value of
     $116,641. (Risk free interest rate of 4.75%; volatility of 96.5%; weighted
     average expected life of 20 years; weighted average fair value per share of
     $0.155). In accordance with APB 14, the value of these warrants should be
     extracted from the total cash received and the difference ascribed to the
     secured debt and amortized over the remaining term of the loan.

     In accordance with EITF 96-19, these modifications to the debt have been
     evaluated by comparing the present value of the cash flows under the old
     debt with the present value of the cash flows under the new debt, both
     discounted at the effective interest rate of the old debt.

     For purposes of this calculation, the remaining cash flows as at February
     28, 2007 on the original term loan issued on June 30, 2006 were compared to
     modified cash flows on the term loan modified as of February 28, 2007. In
     this case, the allocated fair value of the additional warrants issued in
     November 15, 2006 and on February 28, 2007 ($74,839 and $116,641,
     respectively) were considered as a cash flow at inception of the new term
     loan.

      As the difference of 27% was greater than 10%, the modifications resulted
     in an extinguishment of the old debt. As a result, the modification is to
     be accounted for in the same manner as a debt extinguishment and all fees
     paid to or received from Laurus are to be associated with the
     extinguishment of the old debt instrument and included in determining the
     debt extinguishment gain or loss.

     In accordance with EITF 96-19, the new debt must be accounted for at fair
     value. In order to fair value the new term loan, the effective rate of the
     convertible debenture issued by the Company on May 10, 2007 was calculated
     and the conversion option was extracted in order to obtain an effective
     rate of approximately 24%. The resulting loss of $168,784 including the
     write off of the value attributed to the warrants as of February 28, 2007
     is included in financing costs in the consolidated statement of operations
     for the three months ended March 31, 2007.

     At March 31, 2007, the Company had five unsecured promissory notes
     outstanding to the shareholders of TMG totaling $559,750 with quarterly
     payments of $69,969 which were to start September 30, 2006. The notes bear
     interest at an annual rate equal to the Wall Street Journal prime rate and
     mature on June 30, 2008. The Company has not made any scheduled principal
     payments on the notes due to cash flow constraints. Included in interest
     expense in the consolidated statement of operations for the three months
     ended March 31, 2007 is $15,561 in accrued but unpaid interest and default
     penalties on the promissory notes.

     At March 31, 2007, the Company held various capital leases in the amount of
     $3,234 secured by property and equipment with various payment terms and
     interest rates ranging from 10-22%. These leases mature between April 2007
     and July 2007.



     ii) December 31, 2006

     On June 30, 2006, the Company reached a settlement with W. Terry Lyons with
     respect to the secured loan outstanding to him in the amount of $178,062
     including accrued interest. In consideration of a monetary payment by the
     Company of $100,000 and execution of a Full and Final Release, Lyons
     released the Company of all rights and debt held by him and forgave the
     balance of the loan of $78,062 which is included in debt forgiveness in the
     consolidated statement of operations at December 31, 2006.

     On June 30, 2006, the Company repaid the balance owing on an SBA loan held
     by TMG in the amount of $84,083 pursuant to the purchase agreement. This
     loan was personally guaranteed by the principal shareholders of TMG and
     collateralized by their personal residence and TMG's accounts receivables.

     On June 30, 2006, the Company repaid an Officer's Loan to the vendors of
     TMG in the amount of $349,624 with a cash payment of $100,000 and 1,202,009
     shares of the Company's common stock, no par value per share, for
     consideration of $249,624.

                                      -23-
<PAGE>

THINKPATH INC.
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT MARCH 31, 2007
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)



     On June 30, 2006, Laurus Master Fund Ltd. issued the Company a secured term
     loan in the amount of $1,400,000 of which the proceeds were used to fund
     the acquisition of TMG. The loan is payable monthly starting October 1,
     2006 in the amount of $42,424 per month. The loan bears interest at an
     annual rate equal to the Wall Street Journal prime rate plus 2%. The loan
     matures June 30, 2009. In connection with the financing, the Company issued
     Laurus a warrant to purchase up to 1,810,674 shares of the Company's common
     stock at $.0001 per share. Laurus is prohibited from selling any of the
     warrants until June 30, 2007 and thereafter is prohibited from selling an
     amount of shares in excess of 15% of the daily volume of trading of the
     Company's common stock on any day.

     The warrants issued with the term loan are subject to the modified
     Registration Rights Agreement (note 9) including the 2% liquidated damages
     clause and therefore are classified as embedded derivatives under EITF
     00-19. The warrants were valued as $304,763 as of June 30, 2006 using
     standard Black-Scholes methodology with a dilution effect. (Risk free
     interest rate of 5.38%; volatility of 142%; weighted average expected life
     of 10 years; weighted average fair value per share of $0.17). In accordance
     with APB 14, the value of these warrants should be extracted from the total
     cash received and the difference ascribed to the secured debt. Beginning
     July 1, 2006, the Company began amortizing the initial value of the
     embedded derivative over the three year term of the loan.

     On November 15, 2006, the Company executed an Omnibus Amendment No. 1 with
     Laurus Master Fund, Inc. (note 9), whereby Laurus agreed to postpone the
     December and January principal payments on the term note to be paid instead
     on the Maturity Date of June 30, 2009. The fair value of the warrants
     issued in consideration of this amendment was determined to be $74,839 and
     will be amortized over the remaining life of the term loan using the
     effective interest method.

     On June 30, 2006, the Company issued five unsecured promissory notes to the
     shareholders of TMG totaling $559,750 with quarterly payments of $69,969
     starting September 30, 2006. The notes bear interest at an annual rate
     equal to the Wall Street Journal prime rate and mature on June 30, 2008. At
     December 31, 2006, the Company had failed to make any scheduled principal
     payments on the notes due to cash flow constraints. Included in interest
     expense in the consolidated statement of operations at December 31, 2006,
     is $31,121 in accrued but unpaid interest and default penalties on the
     promissory notes.

     On June 30, 2006, the Company assumed a motor vehicle loan as a result of
     the acquisition of TMG in the amount of $11,160 with monthly payments of
     $372 for 36 months starting January 14, 2006. The loan was secured by the
     motor vehicle and bore interest at 7.5% per annum. The loan was to mature
     on January 14, 2009. In July 2006, this liability was assumed by a TMG
     employee.

     At December 31, 2006, the Company held various capital leases in the amount
     of $7,178 secured by property and equipment with various payment terms and
     interest rates ranging from 10-22%.


                                                           3/31/07      12/31/06
                                                           -------      --------
                                                                 $             $
     a) Included therein:

     Laurus Term Loan                                    1,272,727     1,315,151
     Promissory Notes - TMG                                559,750       559,750
     Capital Leases                                          3,234         7,178
                                                             -----         -----
                                                         1,835,711     1,882,079

     Less:  deferred financing costs on Laurus Term Loan   243,454       326,394
     Less:  current portion                                940,662       824,709
                                                           -------       -------

                                                           651,595       730,976
                                                           =======       =======

     b) Future principal payment obligations as at March 31, 2007, were as
        follows:

                          2007                    782,285
                          2008                    648,549
                          2009                    404,877
                          2010                         --
                          2011                         --
                                                ---------
                                                1,835,711
                                                =========

     c) Interest expense related to long-term debt for the three months ended
     March 31, 2007 was $48,788. Interest expense related to long-term debt for
     the year ended December 31, 2006 was $140,612.


                                      -24-
<PAGE>
THINKPATH INC.
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT MARCH 31, 2007
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)



12.    CAPITAL STOCK

       a)  Authorized Shares

           Unlimited   Common stock, no par value
           1,000,000   Preferred stock, issuable in series, rights to be
                       determined by the Board of Directors

     Effective June 29, 2005, the Company implemented a one-for-five thousand
     reverse split of its common stock. At the time of the reverse stock split,
     each five thousand shares of the Company's issued and outstanding common
     stock were combined into one share of its common stock. The reverse stock
     split did not change the number of authorized shares of the Company's
     common stock. The one-for-five thousand reverse split was approved by the
     Company's shareholders at its Annual General Meeting on April 22, 2005, and
     subsequently approved by its Board of Directors. All common share and per
     share amounts throughout these financial statements have been adjusted to
     give effect to this reverse stock split.

     b)  Issued Shares

     At December 31, 2005, the Company had a total of 4,738,322 shares of common
     stock issued and outstanding.

     On June 30, 2006, the Company issued 3,369,188 shares of its common stock,
     no par value per share, to the selling shareholders of TMG for a total
     consideration of $699,687. The Company also issued 1,202,009 shares of its
     common stock, no par value per share, to the Vendors of TMG as repayment of
     an Officer's Loan in the amount $249,624.

     On June 30, 2006, the Company issued 316,563 shares of its common stock, no
     par value per share, to Leventis Investments for a total consideration of
     $63,313 as partial payment of a buyer's fee for the TMG acquisition.

     On July 1, 2006, the Company issued 162,000 shares of its common stock, no
     par value, with "piggyback" registration rights to Financial Media
     Relations, LLC (FMR), a California company, for the purpose of developing
     and implementing a marketing and investor relations program and the
     provision of business development and strategic advisory services. The term
     of the agreement is six months beginning July 1, 2006 and also includes a
     monthly cash fee of $5,000. Subsequent to December 31, 2006, the Company
     notified FMR that it was terminating the contract and canceling the 162,000
     shares for FMR's failure to deliver any services.

     On July 21, 2006, the Company issued 200,000 shares of its common stock, no
     par value, as director compensation.

     At December 31, 2006, the Company had a total of 9,826,082 shares of common
     stock issued and outstanding.

     There were no shares of common stock issued during the three months ended
     March 31, 2007.

     c) Warrants

     For each of the periods presented, the following warrants for the purchase
     of one common share per warrant at the following prices per common share
     and expiry dates were outstanding:

    Number of warrants                Exercise price
        3/31/07          12/31/06         per share         Expiry date
    ------------ ----------------- ------------------ -------------------
        500,000           500,000              $0.41                2007
        100,000           100,000              $1.20                2007
            124               124            $200.00                2009
          2,400             2,400             $87.50                2009
            229               229              $1.25                2009
          1,714             1,714             $87.50                2010
          2,857             2,857             $43.75                2010
         13,333            13,333              $3.75                2010
          9,083             9,083              $1.25                2010
         47,388            47,388              $1.25                2011
         62,500            62,500              $1.00                2011
      1,050,000         1,050,000              $0.55                2011
      1,050,000         1,050,000              $0.60                2011
        940,750           940,750              $0.23                2013
      1,810,674         1,810,674              $0.01                2016
        500,000           500,000              $0.01                2026
      2,426,870                --              $0.01                2027
    ------------ ----------------- ------------------ -------------------

      8,517,922         6,091,052
    ------------ ----------------- ------------------ -------------------


                                      -25-
<PAGE>

THINKPATH INC.
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT MARCH 31, 2007
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)



     A summary of changes to number of issued warrants is as follows:

     Outstanding at December 31, 2005                        2,839,861
                                                           -----------
     Issued                                                  3,251,424
     Cancelled                                                      --
     Exercised                                                      --
     Expired                                                      (233)
                                                           -----------
     Outstanding at December 31, 2006                        6,091,052
                                                           ===========
     Issued                                                  2,426,870
     Cancelled                                                      --
     Exercised                                                      --
     Expired                                                        --
                                                           -----------
     Outstanding at March 31, 2007                           8,517,922
                                                           ===========


     As disclosed in note 9, on January 26, 2006, the Company issued 500,000
     additional common stock purchase warrants to Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. with
     an exercise price of $0.01 per share and expire on January 26, 2012. On
     March 30, 2007, the expiration date of these warrants was amended to
     January 26, 2026.

     As disclosed in note 11, on June 30, 2006, the Company issued 1,810,674
     common stock purchase warrants to Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. with an exercise
     price of $.0001 per share and which expire on June 30, 2016. Laurus is
     prohibited from selling any of the warrants until June 30, 2007 and
     thereafter is prohibited from selling an amount of shares in excess of 15%
     of the daily volume of trading of the Company's common stock on any day. On
     February 28, 2007 the exercise price of these warrants was amended to $0.01
     per share.

     As disclosed in note 9, on November 15, 2006, the Company issued 940,750
     common stock purchase warrants to Laurus Master Fund, Ltd with an exercise
     price of $.23 per share and which expire on November 15, 2013.

     As disclosed in note 9, on February 28, 2007, the Company issued 2,426,870
     common stock purchase warrants to Laurus Master Fund, Ltd with an exercise
     price of $.01 per share and which expire on February 28, 2027.


     d) Stock Options

     The Company's Board of Directors and shareholders have approved the
     adoption of the 1998 Stock Option Plan, 2000 Stock Option Plan, 2001 Stock
     Option Plan, 2002 Stock Option Plan and 2005 Stock Option Plan. Under the
     plans, a total of 2,001,674 options were authorized to be granted to
     officers, directors, consultants, key employees, advisors and similar
     parties who provide their skills and expertise to the Company. At March 31,
     2007, 1,839,572 options remain outstanding and 162,102 options are
     available for future grant. At December 31, 2006, 1,839,572 options remain
     outstanding and 162,102 options are available for future grant.

     The plans are administrated by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
     Directors, which determine among other things, those individuals who shall
     receive options, the time period during which the options may be partially
     or fully exercised, the number of common stock to be issued upon the
     exercise of the options and the option exercise price. The plans are
     effective for a period of ten years.

     Options granted to employees under the plans generally require a three-year
     vesting period, and shall be at an exercise price that may not be less than
     the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant. Options
     are non-transferable and if a participant ceases affiliation with the
     Company by reason of death, permanent disability or retirement at or after
     age 65, the option remains exercisable for one year from such occurrence
     but not beyond the option's expiration date. Other types of termination
     allow the participant 90 days to exercise the option, except for
     termination for cause, which results in immediate termination of the
     option.

     Any unexercised options that expire or that terminate upon an employee's
     ceasing to be employed by the Company become available again for issuance
     under the plans, subject to applicable securities regulation.

     The plans may be terminated or amended at any time by the Board of
     Directors, except that the number of common stock reserved for issuance
     upon the exercise of options granted under the plans may not be increased
     without the consent of the stockholders of the Company.

     On February 28, 2007, the exercise price of 379,572 options issued to
     Laurus Master Fund, Ltd on June 27, 2005 was amended from $.0001 to $0.01
     per share.

                                      -26-
<PAGE>
THINKPATH INC.
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT MARCH 31, 2007
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)



      e)  Preferred Stock

     On June 30, 2006, the Company issued 700 shares of Series D preferred stock
     to the Vendors of TMG for a total consideration of $669,689. The Series D
     preferred stock is convertible into common stock at the option of the
     holder, one year from issuance by dividing $669,689 by the market price of
     the Company's common stock prior to conversion.


  13.    DEFERRED INCOME TAXES AND INCOME TAXES

     a)  Deferred Income Taxes

     The components of the deferred tax liability benefit by source of
     temporary differences that gave rise to the benefit are as follows:

                                                          3/31/07       12/31/06
                                                          -------       --------
                                                                $              $

     Losses available to offset future income taxes     7,665,000      7,543,000
     Deferred costs and customer lists                     33,000         33,000
     Share and debt issue costs                            15,000         12,000
     Property and equipment                             1,009,000        999,000
                                                        ---------        -------
                                                        8,722,000      8,587,000

     Less:  valuation allowance                         8,722,000      8,587,000
                                                        ---------      ---------
                                                               --             --
                                                        =========      =========


     b)  Current Income Taxes

              Current income taxes consist of:
                                                          3/31/07       12/31/06
                                                          -------       --------
                                                                $              $
     Amounts calculated at statutory rates               (74,234)    (1,938,583)
                                                         --------    -----------

     Permanent differences                               (56,879)      1,063,826
     Valuation allowance                                  134,654        886,000
                                                          -------        -------
                                                           77,775      1,949,826
                                                           ------      ---------

     Current income taxes                                   3,541         11,243
     Deferred income taxes                                     --             --
                                                            -----         ------
     Income taxes                                           3,541         11,243
                                                            =====         ======


     Issue expenses totaling approximately $237,000 may be claimed at the rate
     of 20% per year until 2010. To the extent that these expenses create a
     loss, which are available to be carried forward for seven years for losses
     up to and including 2003 and for ten years commencing in 2004 from the year
     the loss is incurred. The Company has not reflected the benefit of
     utilizing non-capital losses totaling approximately $19,162,000, nor a
     capital loss totaling $750,000 in the future as a deferred tax asset as at
     March 31, 2007. As at the completion of the March 31, 2007 financial
     statements, management believed it was more likely than not that the
     results of future operations would not generate sufficient taxable income
     to realize the deferred tax assets.



14.  COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
                                                          3/31/07      12/31/06
                                                          -------      --------
                                                                $             $
     Net loss                                           (189,127)   (4,857,713)
     Other comprehensive loss
        Foreign currency translation adjustments            (866)      (78,827)
                                                            -----      --------

     Comprehensive loss                                 (189,993)   (4,936,540)
                                                        =========   ===========


     The foreign currency translation adjustments are not currently adjusted for
     income taxes since the Company is located in Canada and the adjustments
     relate to the translation of the financial statements from Canadian dollars
     into United States dollars done only for the convenience of the reader.

                                      -27-
<PAGE>

THINKPATH INC.
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT MARCH 31, 2007
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)



15.     SEGMENTED INFORMATION

     a) Revenue and Gross Profit by Geographic Area

                                                    Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                            2007           2006
                                                            ----           ----
                                                               $              $
     Revenue
       Canada                                            271,638        432,910
       United States of America                        3,580,294      2,477,404
                                                       ---------      ---------
                                                       3,851,932      2,910,314
                                                       =========      =========
     Gross Profit
       Canada                                            119,962        166,133
       United States of America                        1,249,045        655,251
                                                       ---------        -------
                                                       1,369,007        821,384
                                                       =========        =======

     b) Net Loss by Geographic Area
                                                    Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                            2007           2007
                                                            ----           ----
                                                               $              $
     Canada                                            (440,097)      (153,010)
     United States of America                            250,970      (218,646)
                                                         -------      ---------
                                                       (189,127)      (371,656)
                                                       =========      =========


     c)   Identifiable Assets by Geographic Area
                                                         3/31/07       12/31/06
                                                         -------       --------
                                                               $              $
     Canada                                              477,085        606,087
     United States of America                          5,656,352      5,043,290
                                                       ---------      ---------
                                                       6,133,437      5,649,377
                                                       =========      =========


     d) Revenues from Major Customers and Concentration of Credit Risk

     The consolidated entity had the following revenues from major customers:

     For the three months ended March 31, 2007, one customer had sales of
     $984,142, representing approximately 26% of total revenue.

     For the three months ended March 31, 2006, one customer had sales of
     $412,614, representing approximately 14% of total revenue.

     e)  Purchases from Major Suppliers

     There were no significant purchases from major suppliers.



16.    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

a) Lease Commitments

     Minimum payments under operating leases for premises occupied by the
     Company and its subsidiaries offices, located throughout Ontario, Canada
     and the United States, exclusive of most operating costs and realty taxes,
     as at March 31, 2007, for the next five years are as follows:

                             2007              236,016
                             2008              213,256
                             2009              140,477
                             2010               99,112
                             2011                   --
                                               -------
                                               688,861
                                               =======

     The lease commitments do not include an operating lease for premises in New
     York that the Company sub leased to Thinkpath Training LLC, the purchaser
     of the United States training division. Thinkpath Training LLC is a
     non-related company and its principal officer is the daughter of the
     Company's Chief Executive Officer, Declan French.

                                      -28-
<PAGE>

THINKPATH INC.
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT MARCH 31, 2007
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)


     In April 2006, the Company was notified by the purchaser that they had
     failed to meet their rent obligations and had accumulated rent arrears of
     approximately $80,000. The lessor filed a claim against Thinkpath Training
     LLC, the sub tenant, and the Company demanding that the rent arrears be
     paid and the premises vacated immediately. On June 1, 2006, a default
     judgment was awarded to the lessor and entered against the Company. On July
     7, 2006, the Company's motion to vacate the default judgment was denied. On
     July 27, 2006, the court agreed to the Company's motion to renew and
     reargue its prior motion seeking to vacate the default judgment on August
     23, 2006. Upon reargue on September 7, 2006, the court vacated the judgment
     and dismissed the petition. On September 21, 2006, the Company received
     notice from the landlord demanding payment of the current arrears of
     approximately $360,000 in unpaid rent and additional charges and its intent
     to commence legal proceedings against the Company in the event that such
     payment is not made. In March 2007, the Lessor filed a motion for summary
     judgment. The Company was granted an extension until May 2007, to have a
     hearing on this motion. The Company continues to defend this claim
     vigorously, although it is also working to reach a settlement with the
     Lessor. At March 31, 2007, the Company has accrued $100,000 related to this
     claim.

     The lease commitments do not include an operating lease for premises
     located in Brampton, Ontario that were vacated in February 2007. The
     Company has not made any payments on this lease since November 2006 and
     will attempt to negotiate a settlement with the landlord for early
     termination. The Company may be liable for a lease balance of $173,913
     which expires April 2008. The Company relocated its Canadian operations to
     Toronto, Ontario and entered a short-term sub lease which expires June 30,
     2007 with an option to renew for an indeterminate period. At March 31,
     2007, the Company has accrued $45,000 in rent expense to cover the period
     from November 2006 until February 2007.

     In February 2007, the Company provided the landlord of its Cincinnati
     office the required 120 days notice of its intent to terminate the lease.

     b) On November 3, 2005, the Company terminated the service agreement of the
     vendors of TBM Technologies Inc., acquired on January 17, 2005, for what it
     believes is a material breach of the agreement by the vendors. The vendors
     are seeking termination pay from the Company in the amount of approximately
     $40,000. The Company has filed a counterclaim for losses suffered as well
     as jeopardy to its reputation by the actions of the vendors. The Company
     has not accrued any costs related to this claim.

     c) The Company is party to various lawsuits arising from the normal course
     of business and its restructuring activities. No material provision has
     been recorded in the accounts for possible losses or gains. Should any
     expenditure be incurred by the Company for the resolution of these
     lawsuits, they will be charged to the operations of the year in which such
     expenditures are incurred.


17.    SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

     On April 19, 2007, the Company executed an agreement with John and Cecelia
     Kennedy which amends certain elements of the provision governing merger
     consideration in Section 2.7 of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as
     of June 29, 2006 among the Company, The Multitech Group, Inc., the
     Kennedy's and other parties. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the
     Kennedy's will return for cancellation 4,065,820 common shares, 595
     preferred shares and non-negotiable promissory notes in the aggregate
     amount of $475,788 issued upon execution of the Merger Agreement. In
     consideration of these events, the Company issued a promissory note in the
     amount of $800,000 payable over 60 months beginning January 2008 and
     bearing interest at annual rate of 6%.

     On May 10, 2007, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement
     with Trafalgar Capital Specialized Investment Fund, Luxembourg with respect
     to the purchase of up to $8,000,000 in 12% convertible debentures
     convertible into common shares pursuant to Regulation "S". The first
     debenture of $400,000 was issued by the Company on May 10, 2007 and is
     convertible at a 10% discount to the lowest of the daily volume weighted
     average price during the preceding 10 days and becomes due 2 years from its
     date of issuance. The Company also issued a Convertible Compensation
     Debenture Agreement, dated May 10, 2007 with respect to a debenture in the
     amount of $160,000 as a facility fee convertible under the same terms and
     also due 2 years from its date of issuance. In the event that Trafalgar
     fails to raise an additional minimum amount of $600,000 in convertible
     debentures, the Convertible Compensation Debenture Agreement will be
     cancelled. The Company also issued 250,000 shares of common stock, no par
     value, in consideration of a $40,000 facility fee.

     On May 14, 2007, the Company entered into a Service Agreement with ROI
     Group LLC, a Delaware corporation for the provision of investor relations
     services on behalf of the Company for a period of twelve months. Pursuant
     to the agreement, the Company is required to issue 240,000 shares of its
     common stock and provide cash payments of $10,000 per month for the
     duration of the agreement.

     On May 14, 2007, Blair Taylor resigned from the Company's Board of
     Directors which resignation was accepted in a resolution adopted during a
     meeting of the Board of Directors held on that day. Mr. Taylor did not have
     any disagreements with the Company or its Board of Directors. To fill the
     vacancy created, the directors appointed Judd Bedford until the next annual
     meeting of shareholders.

                                      -29-
<PAGE>
THINKPATH INC.
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS AT MARCH 31, 2007
(AMOUNTS EXPRESSED IN US DOLLARS)


18.     FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

     a) Credit Risk Management

     The Company is exposed to credit risk on the accounts receivable from its
     customers. In order to reduce its credit risk, the Company has adopted
     credit policies, which include the analysis of the financial position of
     its customers and the regular review of their credit limits. In some cases,
     the Company requires bank letters of credit or subscribes to credit
     insurance.

     b) Concentration of Credit Risk

     The Company's revenue is derived from customers of various industries and
     geographic locations reducing its credit risk. Where exposed to credit
     risk, the Company mitigates this risk by routinely assessing the financial
     strength of its customers, establishing billing arrangements and monitoring
     the collectibility of the account on an ongoing basis.

     c) Interest Risk

     The long-term debt bears interest rates that approximate the interest rates
     of similar loans. Consequently, the long-term debt risk exposure is
     minimal.

     d) Fair Value of Financial Instruments

     The carrying values of the accounts receivable and of the accounts payable
     on acquisition of subsidiary company approximates their fair values because
     of the short-term maturities of these items.

     The carrying amount of the long-term assets approximates the fair value of
     these assets.

     The fair value of the Company's long-term debt is based on the estimated
     quoted market prices for the same or similar debt instruments. The fair
     value of the long-term debt approximates the carrying value.

     The fair value of the Company's debt instruments with embedded derivatives
     are measured separately at the end of each period using a combination of
     Black-Scholes methodologies and Monte Carlo simulations. As the Company has
     no public rating or no public debt, it is very difficult to estimate the
     potential change of the credit spread between the issue date and valuation
     dates. Moreover, there is no evidence of any material event that could
     change significantly the credit spread of the issue. A constant credit
     spread equal to 300 basis points as per the issue date was therefore
     assumed in the valuation and current volatility rates were used. Changes in
     the fair value of derivates are charged to current earnings.


19.    COMPARATIVE FIGURES

     Certain figures in the March 31, 2006 financial statements have been
     reclassified to conform to the basis of presentation used at March 31,
     2007.

                                      -30-
<PAGE>






<PAGE>


ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION.

         The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction
with the financial statements and notes thereto and the other historical
financial information of Thinkpath Inc. contained elsewhere in this Form 10-QSB.
The statements contained in this Form 10-QSB that are not historical are
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, including statements regarding Thinkpath Inc.'s expectations,
intentions, beliefs or strategies regarding the future. Forward-looking
statements include Thinkpath Inc.'s statements regarding liquidity, anticipated
cash needs and availability and anticipated expense levels. All forward-looking
statements included in this Form 10-QSB are based on information available to
Thinkpath Inc. on the date hereof, and Thinkpath Inc. assumes no obligation to
update any such forward-looking statement. It is important to note that
Thinkpath Inc.'s actual results could differ materially from those in such
forward-looking statements. All dollar amounts stated throughout this Form
10-QSB are in United States dollars unless otherwise indicated. Unless otherwise
indicated, all reference to "Thinkpath," "us," "our," and "we," refer to
Thinkpath Inc. and its subsidiaries.

OVERVIEW

         Thinkpath provides engineering services including design, build,
drafting, technical publishing and documentation, and on-site engineering
support to customers in the defense, aerospace, automotive, material handling,
healthcare and manufacturing industries.

         We were incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada
in 1994. In September 1999, we acquired an engineering services company CadCam
Inc. and its two subsidiaries, CadCam Michigan Inc. and CadCam Technical
Services Inc. CadCam Inc. was founded in 1977.

         Our principal executive offices are located at 16 Four Seasons Place,
Toronto, Ontario, Canada and our website is WWW.THINKPATH.COM.

PLAN OF OPERATION

        We are focused on building relationships with customers in high growth
industries such as defense and aerospace. We believe we are poised to benefit
from the increased demand generated by aerospace and defense-related customers
who we expect will increasingly rely on our project engineering design,
expertise and technical staffing services. This year we will continue to
solidify our relationships to actively increase new business opportunities with
existing customers including General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, General
Electric, United Defense and TACOM. We intend to continue to grow organically as
well as through acquisitions over the next year. Acquisitions will be limited to
profitable engineering companies, which must have an immediate accretive impact.



                                      -31-
<PAGE>


                      STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS--PERCENTAGES
               FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2007 AND 2006

                                                                  Three Months
                                                                 Ended March 31,
                                                                  2007     2006
                                                                     %        %
REVENUE                                                            100      100

COST OF SERVICES                                                    64       72
                                                                   ---      ---
GROSS PROFIT                                                        36       28
EXPENSES
  ADMINISTRATIVE                                                    17       21
  SELLING                                                           12       16
  DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION                                      3        3
  WRITE DOWN OF PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT                               0        0
  FINANCING COSTS                                                    0       (4)
                                                                   ---      ---

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INTEREST CHARGES AND INCOME TAXES               3       (8)

  INTEREST CHARGES                                                   8        5
                                                                   ---      ---

LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES                                            (5)     (13)

INCOME TAXES                                                         0        0
                                                                   ---      ---

NET LOSS                                                            (5)     (13)
                                                                   ===      ===



                                      -32-
<PAGE>


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2007 COMPARED TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 2006

REVENUE
Our revenue is comprised of engineering services including the complete
planning, staffing, development, design, implementation and testing of a
project. It can also involve enterprise-level planning and project anticipation.
Our specialized engineering services include: design, build and drafting,
technical publications and documentation. We outsource our technical
publications and engineering services on both a time and materials and project
basis.

For the three months ended March 31, 2007 we derived 93% of our revenue in the
United States compared to 85% for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This
increase is a result of both the new sales from the TMG acquisition which is US
based and acquired effective April 1, 2006 and the decline in project sales in
Canada during the first quarter of 2007. Consolidated revenues for the three
months ended March 31, 2007 increased by $940,000 or 32% to $3,850,000 as
compared to $2,910,000 for the same period last year. This increase is largely
attributable to the acquisition of TMG which contributed $620,000 in
revenue in the first quarter of 2007. In addition, sales from one major customer
increased from $410,000 or 14% of total revenue to $980,000 or 26% of total
revenue.

COSTS OF SERVICES
The direct costs of engineering services include wages, benefits, software
training and project expenses. Costs of services for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 increased by $390,000 or 19% to $2,480,000 as compared to
$2,090,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This increase is related
to the aforementioned increase in revenue. As a percentage of revenue, the cost
of services for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was 64% compared to 72%
for the three months ended March 31, 2006.


GROSS PROFIT
Gross profit is calculated by subtracting all direct costs from net revenue.
Gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2007 increased by $550,000 or
67%. This increase is related to the increase in revenue. As a percentage of
revenue, gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2007 is 36% compared
to 28% for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This increase is a result of
significant overtime hours during the first quarter of 2007 which are charged to
the customer at higher rates as well as the collection of a direct
hardware/software fee on some projects.

EXPENSES
Total expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 increased by 19% or
$200,000 to $1,240,000 compared to $1,040,000 for the three months ended March
31, 2006.

ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Administrative expenses increased by $60,000 or 10% to $665,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2007 compared to $605,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2006. This increase is largely attributable to the acquisition of TMG
and the related administrative salaries, office expenses and insurance premiums.
These costs were not included in the first quarter of 2006 as the effective date
of the transaction was April 1, 2006. As a percentage of revenue, administrative
expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 were 17% compared to 21% for
the three months ended March 31, 2006. This decline is largely due to cost
reductions that were implemented in February 2007 including a 20% salary
reduction of the executive officers.


                                      -33-
<PAGE>


SELLING EXPENSES
Selling expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 were $470,000 which
is consistent with 2006. As a percentage of revenue, selling expenses for the
three months ended March 31, 2007 were 12% compared to 16% for the three months
ended March 31, 2006. This decrease, despite the addition of the new TMG sales
salaries, is largely due to a 10% salary reduction of all the general managers
as part of the aforementioned cost reductions implemented in February 2007.

DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
For the three months ended March 31, 2007, depreciation and amortization
expenses increased by $10,000, or 11%, to $100,000 compared to $90,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2006. The increase is largely attributable to the
amortization of $60,000 on additional capital assets and other assets including
contracts and customer lists acquired with the TMG acquisition. This increase
was offset by the decrease in depreciation expense on property and equipment as
many assets have either been fully amortized or written off as impaired at
December 31, 2006. As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and amortization
expense for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was 3%, which is consistent
with the same period in 2006.

WRITE DOWN OF PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
At March 31, 2007, we wrote down property and equipment in the amount of
approximately $3,000. The fair value of the impaired asset was generally
estimated by discounting the expected future cash flows of the individual
assets. Impairment was indicated by adverse change in market prices, current
period cash flow losses combined with a history of losses, or a significant
change in the manner in which the asset is to be used.

FINANCING COSTS AND MARK-TO-MARKET ADJUSTMENTS
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we amortized $115,000 of the
initial value of the derivatives and embedded derivatives attached to the Laurus
Master Fund, Ltd. revolving debt facility and term loan. At March 31, 2007, the
fair value of the derivatives and embedded derivatives were marked-to-market
with $280,000 credited to financing costs.


                                      -34-
<PAGE>


On February 28, 2007, we executed an Omnibus Amendment No. 2 with Laurus Master
Fund, Inc., whereby Laurus agreed to postpone the March 2007 through to August
2007 principal payments on the term loan with the postponed principal to be
amortized equally over the remaining term of the loan beginning September 1,
2007, increased the revolver over advance to $1,690,000 and increased the stated
amount of the revolver note to $3,650,000. The agreement also amended the
exercise price of the options issued in June 2005 and the warrants issued in
June 2006 from $0.0001 to $0.01. On March 21, 2007, we executed an Omnibus
Amendment No. 3 with Laurus Master Fund, Inc., whereby the revolver note was
increased to $4,000,000. Any principal indebtedness outstanding on the revolver
in excess of $3,650,000 will bear interest at an annual rate equal to The Wall
Street Journal prime rate plus 23% ("contract rate") but never less than 8%. In
consideration of these modifications to the revolving facility, we issued to
2,426,870 common stock purchase warrants to Laurus with an exercise price of
$0.01 per share which expire on February 28, 2027.

The warrants were valued at February 28, 2007 using standard Black-Scholes
methodology with a dilution effect and determined to have a value of $233,282.
In accordance with APB 14, the value of these warrants should be extracted from
the total cash received and the difference ascribed to the secured debt and
amortized over the remaining term of the loan.

In accordance with EITF 96-19, these modifications to the debt have been
evaluated by comparing the present value of the cash flows under the old debt
with the present value of the cash flows under the new debt, both discounted at
the effective interest rate of the old debt.

To assess the revisions to the term loan, the remaining cash flows as at
February 28, 2007 on the original term loan issued on June 30, 2006 were
compared to modified cash flows on the term loan modified as of February 28,
2007. In this case, the allocated fair value of the additional warrants issued
on November 15, 2006 and on February 28, 2007 were considered as a cash flow at
inception of the new term loan.

As the difference of 27% was greater than 10%, the modifications resulted in an
extinguishment of the old debt. As a result, the modification is to be accounted
for in the same manner as a debt extinguishment and all fees paid to or received
from Laurus are to be associated with the extinguishment of the old debt
instrument and included in determining the debt extinguishment gain or loss.

In accordance with EITF 96-19, the new debt must be accounted for at fair value.
In order to fair value the new term loan, the effective rate of the convertible
debenture issued to Trafalgar on May 10, 2007 was calculated and the conversion
option was extracted in order to obtain an effective rate of approximately 24%.
The resulting loss of $168,784 including the write off of the value attributed
to the warrants as of February 28, 2007 is included in financing costs in the
consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007.

                                      -35-
<PAGE>


To assess the revisions to the revolver, we compared the product of the
remaining term and the maximum available credit of the old arrangement with the
borrowing capacity of the new arrangement. As the borrowing capacity of the new
arrangement is greater than the borrowing capacity of the old arrangement, the
fair value of the warrants associated with the revolver and over advance would
be deferred and amortized over the remaining term of the facility.

During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we amortized $142,105 of the
initial value of the derivatives and embedded derivatives attached to the Laurus
Master Fund, Ltd. convertible debt financing closed on June 27, 2005. At March
31, 2006, the fair value of the derivates and embedded derivatives were
marked-to-market with a total of $266,313 credited to financing costs.

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INTEREST CHARGES AND INCOME TAXES
For the three months ended March 31, 2007, income before interest charges and
income taxes increased by $345,000 to income of $125,000, compared to a loss of
$220,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2006.

INTEREST CHARGES
For the three months ended March 31, 2007, interest charges increased by
$170,000, or 121%, to $310,000, from $140,000 for the three months ended March
31, 2006.

Included in interest charges for the three months ended March 31, 2007 is
$180,000 paid to Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. on the term loan and revolver
facility, $15,000 in interest and penalties on the outstanding TMG promissory
notes and $15,000 in interest on capital leases and miscellaneous charges. Also
included at March 31, 2007 is approximately $100,000 in accrued interest and
penalties for failure to file and effect a registration agreement underlying the
options and warrants of Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. as per the Registration Rights
Agreement executed in June 2005. Accumulated interest and penalties under this
agreement had been waived by Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. from the period October
2005 until March 1, 2007.

Included in the interest charges for the three months ended March 31, 2006 is
$110,000 paid on the revolving convertible note balance and overadvance with
Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. and $30,000 on various loans and leases.

LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES
For the three months ended March 31, 2007, loss before income taxes decreased by
$175,000, or 49%, to $185,000, as compared to $360,000 for the three months
ended March 31, 2006.

                                      -36-
<PAGE>

INCOME TAXES
Income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2007 were $3,500 compared to
$8,000 for the same period in 2006.

NET LOSS
For the three months ended March 31, 2007, net loss decreased by $180,000, or
49%, to a net loss of $190,000, compared to a net loss of $370,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2006.


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

With insufficient working capital from operations, our primary source of cash is
a revolving note facility with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.

On February 28, 2007, we executed an Omnibus Amendment No. 2 with Laurus Master
Fund, Inc., whereby the over advance was increased to $1,690,000 and the stated
amount of the revolver note was increased to $3,650,000. In consideration of
these modifications, the Company issued 2,426,870 common stock purchase warrants
to Laurus with an exercise price of $0.01 per share expiring on February 28,
2027.

On March 21, 2007, we executed an Omnibus Amendment No. 3 with Laurus Master
Fund, Inc., whereby the revolver note was increased to $4,000,000. Any principal
indebtedness outstanding on the revolver in excess of $3,650,000 will bear
interest at an annual rate equal to The Wall Street Journal prime rate plus 23%
("contract rate") but never less than 8%.

At March 31, 2007, the principal balance on the revolving note facility was
$3,706,218 including an overadvance position in the amount of $1,237,961.

At March 31, 2007, the balance on the term loan with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.
was $1,272,727. Pursuant to the Omnibus Amendment No. 2 with Laurus Master Fund,
Inc., Laurus agreed to postpone the March 2007 through to August 2007 principal
payments on the term note with the postponed principal to be amortized equally
over the remaining term of the loan beginning September 1, 2007.

At March 31, 2007, we had outstanding five unsecured promissory notes to the
shareholders of TMG totaling $559,750. Quarterly payments on the notes in the
amount of $69,969 were to have started September 30, 2006. The notes bear
interest at an annual rate equal to the Wall Street Journal prime rate and
mature on June 30, 2008. As at March 31, 2007, no principal or interest payments
had been made on he notes due to cash flow constraints.

At March 31, 2007, we held various capital leases in the amount of $3,234
secured by property and equipment with various payment terms and interest rates
ranging from 10-22%. These leases mature between April 2007 and July 2007.

At March 31, 2007, we had cash of $70,000, a working capital deficiency of
$3,090,000 and a cash flow deficiency from operations of $280,000. At March 31,
2006 we had cash of $95,000, a working capital deficiency of $1,100,000 and cash
flow from operations of $205,000.

                                      -37-
<PAGE>

At March 31, 2007, we had a cash flow deficiency from investing activities of
$20,000 related to the purchase of property and equipment. At March 31, 2006 we
had a cash flow deficiency from investing activities of $5,000 largely related
to the purchase of property and equipment.

At March 31, 2007 we had cash flow from financing activities of $250,000 largely
attributable to proceeds from the revolving facility with Laurus of $320,000
less deferred costs of $20,000 and debt repayment of $50,000. At March 31, 2006,
we had cash flow from financing activities of $145,000 attributable primarily to
proceeds from the convertible financing facility with Laurus of $165,000 less
debt repayment of $20,000.

Although we believe that our current working capital and cash flows from
continuing operations will be adequate to meet our anticipated cash requirements
for the next twelve months, we have accrued liabilities and potential
settlements of outstanding claims that may require additional funds. We will
have to raise these funds through equity or debt financing. There can be no
assurance that we will be able to close this financing or that additional
financing will be available or that such financing will be obtainable on terms
favorable to us and would not be dilutive.

Despite our recurring losses and negative working capital, we believe that we
have developed a business plan that, if successfully implemented, could improve
our operational results and financial condition. However, we can give no
assurances that our current cash flows from operations, if any, borrowings
available under our receivable discount facility, and proceeds from the sale of
securities, will be adequate to fund our expected operating and capital needs
for the next twelve months. The adequacy of our cash resources over the next
twelve months is primarily dependent on our operating results and the
effectiveness of a registration statement registering the shares underlying the
Laurus warrants which are subject to substantial uncertainties. Cash flow from
operations for the next twelve months will depend, among other things, upon the
effect of the current economic slowdown on our sales and management's ability to
implement our business plan. The failure to return to profitability and optimize
operating cash flow in the short term, and to successfully raise additional
financing, could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity position and
capital resources, which may force us to curtail our operations.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections", applying to all voluntary accounting principle changes as well as
the accounting for and reporting of such changes. SFAS No. 154 requires
voluntary changes in accounting principle be retrospectively applied to
financial statements from previous periods unless such application is
impracticable. SFAS No. 154 requires that changes in depreciation, amortization,
or depletion methods for long-lived, non-financial assets must be accounted for
as a change in accounting estimate due to a change in accounting principle. By
enhancing the consistency of financial information between periods, the
requirements of FASB 154 improves financial reporting. FASB 154 replaces APB
Opinion No. 20 and FASB 3. FASB 154 carries forward many provisions of Opinion
20 and FASB 3 without change including those provisions related to reporting a
change in accounting estimate, a change in reporting entity, correction of an
error and reporting accounting changes in interim financial statements. FASB 154
is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2005.

                                      -38-
<PAGE>

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, "Accounting for Certain Hybrid
Financial Instruments" ("SFAS 155"). SFAS 155 allows any hybrid financial
instrument that contains an embedded derivatives that otherwise would require
bifurcation under SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities" to be carried at fair value in its entirety, with changes in
fair value recognized in earnings. In addition, SFAS 155 requires that
beneficial interests in securitized financial assets be analyzed to determine
whether they are freestanding derivatives or contain an embedded derivative.
SFAS 155 also eliminates a prior restriction on the types of passive derivatives
that a qualifying special purpose entity is permitted to hold. SFAS 155 is
applicable to new or modified financial instruments in fiscal years beginning
after September 15, 2006, though the provisions related to fair value accounting
for hybrid financial instruments can also be applied to existing instruments.
Early adoption, as of the beginning of an entity's fiscal year, is also
permitted, provided interim financial statements have not yet been issued. We
are currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, that the adoption of SFAS
155 will have on our results of operations or financial position.

In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 156, "Accounting for Servicing of Financial
Assets-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140". This statement amends FASB
Statement No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities", with respect to the accounting for
separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. This
statement: (1) requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing
liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by
entering into a servicing contract in any of the following situations: (a) a
transfer of the servicer's financial assets that meets the requirements for sale
accounting, (b) a transfer of the servicer's financial assets to a qualifying
special-purpose entity in a guaranteed mortgage securitization in which the
transferor retains all of the resulting securities and classifies them as either
available-for-sale securities or trading securities in accordance with FASB
Statement No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities", (c) an acquisition or assumption of an obligation to service a
financial asset that does not relate to financial assets of the servicer or its
consolidated affiliates; (2) requires all separately recognized servicing assets
and servicing liabilities to be initially measured at fair value, if
practicable; (3) permits an entity to choose either of the following subsequent
measurement methods for each class of separately recognized servicing assets and
servicing liabilities: (a) Amortization method-Amortize servicing assets or
servicing liabilities in proportion to and over the period of estimated net
servicing income or net servicing loss and assess servicing assets or servicing
liabilities for impairment or increased obligation based on fair value at each
reporting date, or (b) Fair value measurement method-Measure servicing assets or
servicing liabilities at fair value at each reporting date and report changes in
fair value in earnings in the period in which the changes occur; (4) at its
initial adoption, permits a one-time reclassification of available-for-sale
securities to trading securities by entities with recognized servicing rights,
without calling into question the treatment of other available-for-sale
securities under Statement 115, provided that the available-for-sale securities
are identified in some manner as offsetting the entity's exposure to changes in
fair value of servicing assets or servicing liabilities that a servicer elects
to subsequently measure at fair value; and (5) requires separate presentation of
servicing assets and servicing liabilities subsequently measured at fair value
in the statement of financial position and additional disclosures for all
separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. An entity
should adopt this statement as of the beginning of its first fiscal year that
begins after September 15, 2006. Earlier adoption is permitted as of the
beginning of an entity's fiscal year, provided the entity has not yet issued
financial statements, including interim financial statements, for any period of
that fiscal year. The effective date of this Statement is the date an entity
adopts the requirements of this statement.

                                      -39-
<PAGE>


In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB
Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109" (FIN 48), which clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. This Interpretation requires that
we recognize in our financial statements the benefit of a tax position if that
position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the
technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN 48 become effective as
of the beginning of our 2008 fiscal year, with the cumulative effect of the
change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained
earnings. We are currently evaluating the impact that FIN 48 will have on our
financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements"
(FAS 157), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of
FAS 157 become effective as of the beginning of the 2009 fiscal year. We are
currently evaluating the impact that FAS 157 will have on our financial
statements.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 108, "Considering the Effects of Prior Year
Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements" (SAB 108), which addresses how to quantify the effect of financial
statement errors. The provisions of SAB 108 become effective as of the end of
the 2007 fiscal year. We do not expect the adoption of SAB 108 to have a
significant impact on our financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 158, "Employers' Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans" ("SFAS 158") which
requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a
defined benefit plan as an asset or liability in its consolidated balance sheet.
Under SFAS 158, actuarial gains and losses and prior service costs or credits
that have not yet been recognized through earnings as net periodic benefit cost
will be recognized in other comprehensive income, net of tax, until they are
amortized as a component of net periodic benefit cost. SFAS 158 is effective as
of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006 and shall not be
applied retrospectively. We are currently evaluating the impact that the
adoption of SFAS 158 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2006, the FASB issued FSP EITF 00-19-2, "Accounting for Registration
Payment Arrangements." This FASB Staff Position ("FSP") addresses an issuer's
accounting for registration payment arrangements. This FSP specifies that the
contingent obligation to make future payments or otherwise transfer
consideration under a registration payment arrangement, whether issued as a
separate agreement or included as a provision of a financial instrument or other
agreement, should be separately recognized and measured in accordance with FASB
Statement No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. The guidance in this FSP amends
FASB Statements No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, and No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity , and FASB Interpretation No. 45,
Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including
Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others , to include scope exceptions for
registration payment arrangements. This FSP further clarifies that a financial
instrument subject to a registration payment arrangement should be accounted for
in accordance with other applicable generally accepted accounting principles
("GAAP") without regard to the contingent obligation to transfer consideration
pursuant to the registration payment arrangement. This FSP is effective
immediately for registration payment arrangements and the financial instruments
subject to those arrangements that are entered into or modified subsequent to
the date of issuance of this FSP.

                                      -40-
<PAGE>


For registration payment arrangements and financial instruments subject to those
arrangements that were entered into prior to the issuance of this FSP, this
guidance shall be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. Early adoption of this FSP for interim or annual periods for which
financial statements or interim reports have not been issued is permitted. Early
adoption of this FSP for interim or annual periods for which financial
statements or interim reports have not been issued is permitted.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115" (FAS 159). FAS 159 permits companies to choose to measure
many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not
currently required to be measured at fair value and establishes presentation and
disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies
that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and
liabilities. The provisions of FAS 159 become effective as of the beginning of
the 2008 fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact that FAS 159 will
have on our financial statements.


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND POLICIES

On December 12, 2001, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued FR-60,
Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure about Critical Accounting Policies, which
encourages additional disclosure with respect to a company's critical accounting
policies, the judgments and uncertainties that affect a company's application of
those policies, and the likelihood that materially different amounts would be
reported under different conditions and using different assumptions.

Management is required to make certain estimates and assumptions during the
preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP.
These estimates and assumptions impact the reported amount of assets and
liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date
of the consolidated financial statements. They also impact the reported amount
of net earnings during any period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. Certain accounting policies and estimates have a more significant
impact on our financial statements than others, due to the magnitude of the
underlying financial statement elements.

CONSOLIDATION

Our determination of the appropriate accounting method with respect to our
investments in subsidiaries is based on the amount of control we have, combined
with our ownership level, in the underlying entity. Our consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of our parent company and our wholly-owned
subsidiaries. All of our investments are accounted for on the cost method. If we
had the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial
policies of a company, but did not control such company, we would account for
these investments on the equity method.

                                      -41-
<PAGE>



Accounting for an investment as either consolidated or by the equity method
would have no impact on our net income (loss) or stockholders' equity in any
accounting period, but would impact individual income statement and balance
sheet items, as consolidation would effectively "gross up" our income statement
and balance sheet. However, if control aspects of an investment accounted for by
the cost method were different, it could result in us being required to account
for an investment by consolidation or the equity method. Under the cost method,
the investor only records its share of the investee's earnings to the extent
that it receives dividends from the investee; when the dividends received exceed
the investee's earnings subsequent to the date of the investor's investment, the
investor records a reduction in the basis of its investment. Under the cost
method, the investor does not record its share of losses of the investee.
Conversely, under either consolidation or equity method accounting, the investor
effectively records its share of the investee's net income or loss, to the
extent of its investment or its guarantees of the investee's debt.


REVENUE RECOGNITION

We recognize revenue under engineering service contracts when a contract has
been executed, the contract price is fixed and determinable, delivery of
services or products has occurred, and collection of the contract price is
considered probable and can be reasonably estimated. Revenue is earned under
time-and-materials, fixed-price and cost-plus contracts.

We recognize revenue on time-and-materials contracts to the extent of billable
rates times hours delivered, plus expenses incurred. For fixed price contracts
within the scope of Statement of Position 81-1, Accounting for Performance of
Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts (SOP 81-1), revenue is
recognized on the percentage of completion method using costs incurred in
relation to total estimated costs or upon delivery of specific products or
services, as appropriate. For fixed price-completion contracts that are not
within the scope of SOP 81-1, revenue is generally recognized as earned
according to contract terms as the service is provided. We provide our customers
with a number of different services that are generally documented through
separate negotiated task orders that detail the services to be provided and the
compensation for these services. Services rendered under each task order
represent an independent earnings process and are not dependent on any other
service or product sold. We recognize revenue on cost-plus contracts to the
extent of allowable costs incurred plus a proportionate amount of the fee
earned, which may be fixed or performance-based. We consider fixed fees under
cost-plus contracts to be earned in proportion to the allowable costs incurred
in performance of the contract, which generally corresponds to the timing of
contractual billings. We record provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted
contracts in the period in which those losses are identified. We consider
performance-based fees under any contract type to be earned only when it can
demonstrate satisfaction of a specific performance goal or it receive
contractual notification from a customer that the fee has been earned. In all
cases, we recognize revenue only when pervasive evidence of an arrangement
exists services have been rendered, the contract price is fixed or determinable,
and collection is reasonably assured.

                                      -42-
<PAGE>



Contract revenue recognition inherently involves estimation. From time to time,
facts develop that requires us to revise the total estimated costs or revenues
expected. In most cases, these changes relate to changes in the contractual
scope of the work, and do not significantly impact the expected profit rate on a
contract. We record the cumulative effects of any revisions to the estimated
total costs and revenues in the period in which the facts become known.

CARRYING VALUE OF GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Prior to January 1, 2002, our goodwill and intangible assets were accounted for
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121,
Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed of. This statement required us to evaluate the carrying value of our
goodwill and intangible assets upon the presence of indicators of impairment.
Impairment losses were recorded when estimates of undiscounted future cash flows
were less than the value of the underlying asset. The determination of future
cash flows or fair value was based upon assumptions and estimates of forecasted
financial information that may differ from actual results. If different
assumptions and estimates were used, carrying values could be adversely
impacted, resulting in write-downs that would adversely affect our earnings. In
addition, we amortized our goodwill balances on a straight-line basis over 30
years. The evaluation of the useful life of goodwill required our judgment, and
had we chosen a shorter time period over which to amortize goodwill,
amortization expense would have increased, adversely impacting our operations.

Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. This statement requires
us to evaluate the carrying value of goodwill and intangible assets based on
assumptions and estimates of fair value and future cash flow information. These
assumptions and estimates may differ from actual results. If different
assumptions and estimates are used, carrying values could be adversely impacted,
resulting in write-downs that could adversely affect our earnings.

On an ongoing basis, absent any impairment indicators, we expect to perform a
goodwill impairment test as of the end of the fourth quarter of each year.

Effective April 1, 2006, we acquired goodwill in the amount of $1,895,262 in
connection to its acquisition of The Multitech Group which has been allocated to
the Technical Publications and Engineering reporting unit.

At December 31, 2006, we performed our annual impairment test for goodwill by
first comparing the carrying value of the net assets to the fair value of the
Technical Publications and Engineering unit. The fair value was determined to be
less than the carrying value, and therefore a second step was performed to
compute the amount of the impairment. In this process, a fair value for goodwill
was estimated, based in part on the fair value of the operations, and was
compared to its carrying value. The shortfall of the fair value below carrying
value was $2,043,496 which represents the amount of goodwill impairment.

                                      -43-
<PAGE>



FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION

The books and records of our Canadian operations are recorded in Canadian
dollars. The financial statements are converted to US dollars as we have elected
to report in US dollars consistent with Regulation S-X, Rule 3-20. The
translation method used is the current rate method which is the method mandated
by SFAS No. 52 where the functional currency is the foreign currency. Under the
current method all assets and liabilities are translated at the current rate,
stockholders' equity accounts are translated at historical rates and revenues
and expenses are translated at average rates for the year.

Due to the fact that items in the financial statements are being translated at
different rates according to their nature, a translation adjustment is created.
This translation adjustment has been included in accumulated other comprehensive
income.

There can be no assurance that we would have been able to exchange currency on
the rates used in these calculations. We do not engage in exchange rate-hedging
transactions. A material change in exchange rates between United States and
Canadian dollars could have a material effect on our reported results.


RISK FACTORS

Investors should carefully consider the risks described below before making an
investment decision. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the
only ones facing the Company. Additional risks not presently known to us or that
we currently believe are immaterial may also impair our business operations. If
any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or
operating results could be seriously impaired. This section should be read in
conjunction with the Financial Statements and Notes thereto, and Management's
Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation contained in this report.

If we are unable to compete effectively with existing or new competitors, the
loss of our competitive position could result in price reductions, fewer
customer orders, reduced revenues, reduced margins, reduced levels of
profitability, and loss of market share. If we are unable to manage our
inventory, we will not be able to satisfy customer demand. Our reliance on one
or a few suppliers for inventory components could delay shipments and increase
our costs. Our future operating results depend on our ability to purchase a
sufficient amount of components to meet the demands of our customers. Since we
may order components from suppliers in advance of receipt of customer orders for
our products that include these components, we could face a material inventory
risk. Our products may have quality issues that could adversely affect our sales
and reputation. We are dependent on significant customers, as noted in the
"CUSTOMERS" section set forth in Part I, Item 1 of our Annual Report on Form
10-KSB filed with the SEC on April 17, 2007.

We depend on key employees and face competition in hiring and retaining
qualified employees. Recent and proposed regulations related to equity
compensation could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain key
personnel.

                                      -44-
<PAGE>



We expect our quarterly revenues, cash flows and operating results to fluctuate
due to the large size and timing of some orders that can materially affect our
financial statements from quarter to quarter, either obscuring or presenting
trends that do or do not exist. This makes prediction of revenues, earnings and
working capital for each financial period especially difficult and uncertain and
increases the risk of unanticipated variations in quarterly results and
financial condition.

Our stock price can be volatile. Our stock price can be affected by many factors
such as quarterly increases or decreases in our earnings, speculation in the
investment community about our financial condition or results of operations,
technological developments, or the loss of key management or technical
personnel.


RECENT EVENTS

On April 19, 2007, we executed an agreement with John and Cecelia Kennedy which
amends certain elements of the provision governing merger consideration in
Section 2.7 of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of June 29, 2006 among
Thinkpath, The Multitech Group, Inc., the Kennedy's and other parties. Pursuant
to the terms of the agreement, the Kennedy's will return for cancellation
4,065,820 common shares, 595 preferred shares and non-negotiable promissory
notes in the aggregate amount of $475,788 issued upon execution of the Merger
Agreement. In consideration of these events, we issued a promissory note in the
amount of $800,000 payable over 60 months beginning January 2008 and bearing
interest at annual rate of 6%.

On May 10, 2007, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Trafalgar
Capital Specialized Investment Fund, Luxembourg with respect to the purchase of
up to $8,000,000 in 12% convertible debentures convertible into common shares
pursuant to Regulation "S". The first debenture of $400,000 was issued on May
10, 2007 and is convertible at a 10% discount to the lowest of the daily volume
weighted average price during the preceding 10 days and becomes due 2 years from
its date of issuance. We also issued a Convertible Compensation Debenture
Agreement, dated May 10, 2007 with respect to a debenture in the amount of
$160,000 as a facility fee convertible under the same terms and also due 2 years
from its date of issuance. In the event that Trafalgar fails to raise an
additional minimum amount of $600,000 in convertible debentures, the Convertible
Compensation Debenture Agreement will be cancelled. We also issued 250,000
shares of common stock, no par value, in consideration of a $40,000 facility
fee.

On May 14, 2007, we entered into a Service Agreement with ROI Group LLC, a
Delaware corporation for the provision of investor relations services for a
period of twelve months. Pursuant to the agreement, we are required to issue
240,000 shares of our common stock and provide cash payments of $10,000 per
month for the duration of the agreement.

                                      -45-
<PAGE>



On May 14, 2007, Blair Taylor resigned from our Board of Directors which
resignation was accepted in a resolution adopted during a meeting of the Board
of Directors held on that day. Mr. Taylor did not have any disagreements with us
or our Board of Directors. To fill the vacancy created, the directors appointed
Judd Bedford until the next annual meeting of shareholders.


ITEM 3. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure
controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. This evaluation
was done under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer. Based upon that
evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports
that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summerized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules
and forms.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls.

There were no significant changes in the Company's internal controls or in other
factors that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially
affect the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

                          PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, the Company may become involved in various lawsuits and legal
proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation
is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other
matters may arise from time to time that may harm the Company's business. Except
for the following, the Company is currently not aware of nor has any knowledge
of any such legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have, individually
or in the aggregate, a material adverse affect on our business, financial
condition or operating results:


                                      -46-
<PAGE>



In November 2002, we sold certain assets of our training division to Thinkpath
Training LLC ("Thinkpath Training"). Pursuant to this agreement, Thinkpath
Training assumed certain liabilities including the property lease in New York
for this division which expires August 31, 2006. In April 2006, we were notified
by the lessor that Thinkpath Training had failed to meet their rent obligations
and had rent arrears of approximately $80,000.

The lessor filed a claim against Thinkpath Training, the sub tenant, and
Thinkpath Inc. demanding that the rent arrears be paid and the premises vacated
immediately. On June 1, 2006, a default judgment was awarded to the lessor and
entered against us. On July 7, 2006, our motion to vacate the default judgment
was denied. On July 27, 2006, the court agreed to our motion to renew and
reargue our prior motion seeking to vacate the default judgment on August 23,
2006. Upon reargue on September 7, 2006, the court vacated the judgment and
dismissed the petition. On September 21, 2006, we received notice from the
landlord demanding payment of the current arrears of approximately $360,000 in
unpaid rent and additional charges and its intent to commence legal proceedings
against us in the event that such payment is not made. In March 2007, the lessor
filed a motion for summary judgment. We were granted an extension until May
2007, to have a hearing on this motion. We continue to defend this claim
vigorously, although we are also working to reach a settlement with the lessor.



ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALE OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

         None.


ITEM 3.  DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

         None.


ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

         None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

         None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

10.62 Service Agreement between Thinkpath Inc and ROI Group, LLC dated May 14,
      2007.

31.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





                                      -47-
<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.

                               THINKPATH INC.


Dated: May 21, 2007          By: /s/ Declan French       By: /s/ Kelly Hankinson
                             ---------------------       -----------------------
                             Declan French               Kelly L. Hankinson
                             Chief Executive Officer     Chief Financial Officer






                                      -48-