alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thinkpath, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 17, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kelly Hankinson, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

3)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

4)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.



     May 17, 2004                       By: /s/ Kelly Hankinson
                                            Name: Kelly Hankinson
                                            Title: Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 62 (Monday, April 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15706-15707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1611]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel; DD90 Special Emphasis Panel 
(SEP).
    Date: April 19, 2007.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Conference Room 3146, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Katrina L. Foster, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Inst on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism, National 
Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm. 3037, Rockville, MD 
20852, 301-442-3037, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83e8e2f7f1eaede2c3eee2eaefadedeaebade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="046f6570766d6a654469656d682a6a6d6c2a636b72">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


[[Page 15707]]


    Dated: March 26, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1611 Filed 3-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[ARTICLE] 5
[CIK] 0001006762
[NAME] ARCA CORP.
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   YEAR
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1997
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1997
[CASH]                                          61,550
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                    8,740
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                               199,494
[PP&E]                                       3,558,201
[DEPRECIATION]                                 181,765
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                               3,664,601
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                          249,912
[BONDS]                                      3,422,568
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                           206
[OTHER-SE]                                   (158,085)
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                 3,664,601
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                               744,586
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                  745,677
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                     0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                             324,402
[INCOME-PRETAX]                              (325,493)
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                          (325,493)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                162,926
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                 (162,567)
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                    (.10)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                    (.10)
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of CEO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Retail Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert D. Parks as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.X.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.



|/s/ ROBERT D. PARKS              
|---------------------------------
|                                 
|Name:         Robert D. Parks    
|Chief Executive Officer          
|Date:            November 7, 2003
|                                 



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Abatement Order filed October 25 , 2016.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00378

- CV

____________ W & T OFFSHORE INC. , Appellant

V.

LUKE MEYERS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 74366



### ABATEMENT ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due June 14, 2016

. See Tex. R. App. P.
35.1. The record was not filed. On June 23, 2016, the court reporter, Cynthia Montalvo, filed a motion for extension of time to file the record which was granted until July 14, 2016. Again, the record was not filed. On July 26, 2016, this court ordered the court reporter to file the reco rd within 30 days. When the court reporter failed to file the record as ordered, on September 2, 2016, this court ordered the courtreporter to file the record within 30 days, and instructed the court reporter that if the

record was not filed, the court w ould order the trial court to conduct a hearing to
determine the reason for failure to file the record. The record has not been filed with
the court. The court reporter has filed a motion for extension of time until November 3, 2016. The trial and ap pellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely as ordered, we deny the request and issue the following order.

We direct t he judge of the 152nd District Court to conduct a hearing at which the court reporter, appellant’s counsel, and appellee’s counsel shall participate (a) to determine the reason for failure to file the record; (b) to establish a date certain when the report er’s record will be filed, and (c) to make findings as to whether the court reporter should be held in contempt of court for failing to file the reporter’s record timely as ordered. We order the court to prepare a record, in the form of a reporter’s

recor d, of the hearing. The judge shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward to this court a supplemental clerk’s record
containin g the findings and conclusions. The hearing record and supplemental
clerk’s re cord shall be filed with the clerk of this court within 30 days of the date of
this order.
The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. If the court reporter files the recordprior to the date set for the hearing, the appeal will be reinstated and the trial court

need not hold a hearing.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Busby, Donovan, and Brown.
# C_2013046EN.01003002.xml

| 16.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/30

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 11 December 2012 — Vienne v Parliament

(Case F-97/11) (1)

1

(Civil service - Financial rules - Family allowances - Household allowance - End of entitlement to household allowance - Dissolution of marriage)

2013/C 46/58

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Philippe Vienne (Moutfort, Luxembourg) (represented by: P. Nelissen Grade and G. Leblanc, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Ecker and S. Alves, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Civil service — Application for annulment of the decision of the Parliament as to the date on which change of marital status took effect to be taken into consideration for the purposes of withdrawing the household allowance following the civil judgment declaring the applicant’s divorce

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Vienne to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Vienne to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 26.11.11, p. 47.

1

---
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

 

 ) 

CHRISTOPHER VAN HOLLEN, JR., ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) Civ. No. 11-cv-00766-ABJ 

 ) 

 v. ) 

 ) STATUS REPORT 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

 ) 

STATUS REPORT OF DEFENDANT FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Pursuant to the Court’s Orders of October 9, 2012 and October 10, 2012, the Federal 

Election Commission (“Commission” or “FEC”) hereby notifies the Court of an initial decision 

regarding the petition for rulemaking filed with the FEC by the Center for Individual Freedom 

(“CFIF”) on October 5. This decision is the first of several steps that could lead to a revised 

regulation: 

1. Today, the Commission voted 6-0 to publish a Notice of Availability (“NOA”) in 

the Federal Register soliciting public comment in support of or opposition to CFIF’s request for 

a rulemaking. The publishing of an NOA is a routine procedure described in the Commission’s 

regulations and is not an indication as to whether the Commission will ultimately decide to 

undertake a rulemaking. 11 C.F.R. § 200.3. 

2. The Commission will consider the merits of CFIF’s petition after the comment 

period of sixty days has concluded. 11 C.F.R. § 200.3(d). At that time, the Commission will 

determine, based on the comments and other relevant information, whether to initiate a 

rulemaking. 11 C.F.R. § 200.4. 

Case 1:11-cv-00766-ABJ Document 70 Filed 10/18/12 Page 1 of 3
2

3. If the Commission decides to initiate a rulemaking, it will publish a notice of 

proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register and seek comments from the public. 5 U.S.C. 

§ 553(b), (c). If the Commission decides not to initiate a rulemaking, it will publish a notice of 

such disposition in the Federal Register and explain the grounds for its decision. 11 C.F.R. 

§ 200.4(b). 

4. If the Commission publishes a notice of proposed rulemaking, it may also hold a 

public hearing. 5 U.S.C. § 553(c). 

5. After consideration of any public comments received and other relevant 

information, the Commission will decide whether to issue a revised regulation and will explain 

the basis for its decision. 5 U.S.C. § 553(c). 

The Commission also hereby notifies the Court that it opposes the motion to establish a 

briefing schedule filed by CFIF on October 15, 2012 (Docket No. 69) because establishing a 

briefing schedule at this time would be premature in view of CFIF’s own pending petition for 

rulemaking. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Anthony Herman 

General Counsel 

Lisa J. Stevenson (D.C. Bar No. 457628) 

Deputy General Counsel – Law 

David Kolker (D.C. Bar No. 394558) 

Associate General Counsel 

Harry J. Summers 

Assistant General Counsel 

Holly J. Baker 

Attorney 

Case 1:11-cv-00766-ABJ Document 70 Filed 10/18/12 Page 2 of 3
3

/s/ Seth Nesin 

Seth Nesin 

Attorney 

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

999 E Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20463 

Telephone: (202) 694-1650 

Fax: (202) 219-0260 

October 18, 2012 

Case 1:11-cv-00766-ABJ Document 70 Filed 10/18/12 Page 3 of 3
###### Editorial Note on Part 153

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 153.921 Explosives.

No person may load, off-load, or carry a cargo listed in this part on board a vessel that carries explosives unless he has the prior written permission of the Commandant (CG-ENG).

[CGD 73-96, 42 FR 49027, Sept. 26, 1977, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4782, Feb. 3, 1983]
# C_2012025EN.01006601.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/66

---

Order of the General Court of 30 November 2011 — Leopardi Dittajuti v OHIM — Llopart Vilarós (CONTE LEOPARDI DITTAJUTI)

(Case T-303/11) (1)

(2012/C 25/126)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

Mario Papizzo, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Experian Information Solutions, 

Inc., et al., 

Defendants. 

________________________________/

Case No. 14-cv-14211 

Hon. Judith E. Levy 

Mag. Judge R. Steven Whalen 

ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION 

SOLUTIONS, INC. WITH PREJUDICE AND 

WITHOUT COSTS OR FEES 

The Court having received the parties’ Stipulation, and being 

otherwise fully advised in the premises, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Experian Information 

Solutions, Inc. shall be dismissed from this matter with prejudice and 

without costs, fees or sanctions to either party. 

Dated: June 16, 2015 s/Judith E. Levy 

Ann Arbor, Michigan JUDITH E. LEVY 

United States District Judge 

Case 5:14-cv-14211-JEL-RSW ECF No. 27 filed 06/16/15 PageID.112 Page 1 of 1
# C_2011089EN.01002502.xml

| 19.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/25

---

Action brought on 28 January 2011 — Run2Day Franchise v OHIM — Runners Point (Run2)

(Case T-64/11)

2011/C 89/49

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Run2Day Franchise BV (Utrecht, Netherlands) (represented by: H.J. Koenraad, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Runners Point Warenhandels GmbH (Recklinghausen, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 November 2010 in case R 349/2010-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 November 2010 in case R 349/2010-1;

| — | Order the defendant, and if applicable the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, to bear the costs of the proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant, and if applicable the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, to bear the costs of the proceedings;

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘Run2’, for goods and services in classes 18, 25 and 35 — Community trade mark application No 6517502

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 3800448 of the word mark ‘RUN2DAY’, for goods and services in classes 25, 28 and 35; Community trade mark registration No 3832458 of the figurative mark in colours ‘RUN2DAY’, for goods and services in classes 25, 28 and 35; Benelux trade mark registration No 811897 of the figurative mark in colours ‘RUN2DAY’, for goods and services in class 25

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the decision of the Opposition Division and rejected the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal wrongly assessed that there was no likelihood of confusion.

Pleas in law:

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 164

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 164.006-6 Alternative materials.

Products approved under approval series 164.106 may be used where products approved under this subpart are required.

[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48280, July 22, 2016]
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59783, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 148.325 Wood chips; wood pellets; wood pulp pellets. ( a ) This part applies to wood chips and wood pulp pellets in bulk that may oxidize, leading to depletion of oxygen and an increase in carbon dioxide in the cargo hold.
( b ) No person may enter a cargo hold containing wood chips, wood pellets, or wood pulp pellets, unless— ( 1 ) The atmosphere in the cargo hold has been tested and contains enough oxygen to support life; or
( 2 ) The person entering the cargo hold is wearing the appropriate self-contained breathing apparatus.
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
  
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 
 As
Adopted Pursuant to
 
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Sands, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Michael L. Wynhoff,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 that:
  (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as
applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and
  (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 Dated:
      February 18, 2008
              /s/
      Michael L.
      WynhoffMichael
      L. WynhoffChief
      Executive Officer
 
  
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Pacific Sands, Inc. and will be retained by Pacific Sands, Inc and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name                                    State of Incorporation     Date of Incorporation       Status
----                                    ----------------------     ---------------------       ------
<S>                                     <C>                        <C>                         <C>
Big City NY, Inc.                       New York                   November 26, 1997           Wholly-owned by
                                                                                               VillageWorld.com, Inc.

Bagel Partners, Inc.                    Delaware                   May 7, 1996                 Wholly-owned by
                                                                                               VillageWorld.com, Inc.


Intelligent Computer Solutions, Inc.    New York                   October 21, 1994            Wholly-owned by
                                                                                               VillageWorld.com, Inc.

Village Net, Inc.                       New York                   June 6, 1995                Wholly-owned by
                                                                                               VillageWorld.com, Inc.
</TABLE>


                                                                              39