alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Powerhouse Technologies Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jay Elliot, Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Jay Elliot
----------------------------
Jay Elliot, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
April 19, 2004
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.037-5 Labeling and marking. ( a ) *Labeling.* Each hand orange smoke distress signal shall bear a label securely affixed thereto, showing in clear, indelible black lettering on an orange background, the following wording and information: (Company brand or style designation) Hand Orange Smoke Distress Signal For daytime use—50 seconds burning time Use Only When Aircraft or Vessel is Sighted Directions: Pull tape over top of cap. Remove cap and ignite flare by rubbing scratch surface on top of cap sharply across igniter button on head of signal. Caution: Stand with back to wind and point away from body when igniting or signal is burning. Service Life Expiration Date (Month and year to be inserted by manufacturer) (Month and year manufactured) (Lot No. ____). Manufactured by (Name and address of manufacturer). U.S. Coast Guard Approval No. ____.
( b ) *Marking of expiration date.* The expiration date must not be more than 42 months from the date of manufacture.
( c ) *Other marking.* ( 1 ) There shall be die-stamped, in the side of the wooden handle in figures not less than 3 mm (1 ⁄ 8 in.) high, numbers indicating the month and year of manufacture, thus: “6-54” indicating June, 1954.
( 2 ) In addition to any other marking place on the smallest packing carton or box containing hand orange smoke distress signals such cartons or boxes shall be plainly and permanently marked to show the service life expiration date, date of manufacture, and lot number.
( 3 ) The largest carton or box in which the manufacturer ships signals must be marked with the following or equivalent words: “Keep under cover in a dry place.”
Note:
Compliance with the labeling requirements of this section does not relieve the manufacturer of the responsibility of complying with the label requirements of 15 U.S.C. 1263, the Federal Hazardous Substances Act.
----

Exhibit 13.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the annual reportof Birch Mountain Resources Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year endedDecember 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the "Report"), I, John A. Clarke , Vice President, Finance andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

Date: May 22, 2008

|   |   | */s/  John A. Clarke  *                                       |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | **Name: John A. Clarke,**                                                    |
|   |   | Title: Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer    |
# C_2011269EN.01003601.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/36

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 7 July 2011 — O, S

(Case C-356/11)

2011/C 269/74

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Referring court

Korkein hallinto-oikeus

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: O, S

Appellants:

Other party: Maahanmuuttovirasto

Other party:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does Article 20 TFEU preclude a third-country national from being refused a residence permit because of lack of means of subsistence in a family situation in which a child who is a citizen of the Union is cared for by his spouse and the third-country national is not that child’s parent or carer? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does Article 20 TFEU preclude a third-country national from being refused a residence permit because of lack of means of subsistence in a family situation in which a child who is a citizen of the Union is cared for by his spouse and the third-country national is not that child’s parent or carer?

| 2. | If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative, must the effect of Article 20 TFEU be assessed differently if the third-country national who does not have a residence permit, his spouse, and the child who is cared for by the spouse and has Union citizenship live together? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative, must the effect of Article 20 TFEU be assessed differently if the third-country national who does not have a residence permit, his spouse, and the child who is cared for by the spouse and has Union citizenship live together?

---
§ 12.627 Requirements to qualify for an STCW endorsement for security awareness. ( a ) An applicant for an endorsement for security awareness must— ( 1 ) Present satisfactory documentary evidence, such as a certificate or letter signed by a company official, or a certificate of completion from a Coast Guard-accepted or Coast Guard-approved course, of meeting the requirements in 33 CFR 104.225;
( 2 ) Meet the physical examination requirements in 46 CFR, part 10, subpart C; and
( 3 ) Meet the safety and suitability requirements and the National Driver Registry review requirements in § 10.209(e) of this subchapter, unless the applicant has met these requirements within the previous 5 years in connection with another endorsement.
( b ) Until March 24, 2014, seafarers will be able to apply for an endorsement in security awareness by— ( 1 ) Having performed approved seagoing service for a period of at least 6 months in total during the preceding 3 years;
( 2 ) Having performed security functions considered to be equivalent to the seagoing service required in paragraph (b)(1) of this section; or
( 3 ) Successfully completing Coast Guard-accepted or Coast Guard-approved training.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE YORK GROUP, INC. 1998 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,449
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,978
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,854
<INVENTORY>                                     34,841
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,224
<PP&E>                                          87,514
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,288
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 209,264
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,915
<BONDS>                                         79,267
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            89
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,898
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   209,264
<SALES>                                        230,195
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               230,195
<CGS>                                          164,494
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  164,494
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,732
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,983
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,193
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,790
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,790
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.19
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

The certification setforth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solelyfor the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of theUnited States Code.

 

November 19, 2007

 

Bruce N. Warner, the Chief Financial Officer ofNorthern California Bancorp, Inc. certifies:

i.          that this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A, Amendment No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2006fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

ii.         that information contained annual reporton Form 10-KSB/A, Amendment No. 1for the year ended December 31, 2006 fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations  of Northern CaliforniaBancorp, Inc.

 

 
|   | /s/ Bruce N. Warner           |   |
|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   | Bruce N. Warner               |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  and  |
|   | Principal Accounting  Officer |

 

----
§ 15.501 Certificate of inspection. ( a ) The certificate of inspection (COI) issued by an Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI), to a vessel required to be inspected under 46 U.S.C. 3301 specifies the minimum complement of officers and crew necessary for the safe operation of the vessel.
( b ) The manning requirements for a particular vessel are determined by the OCMI after consideration of the applicable laws, the regulations in this part, and all other factors involved, such as: emergency situations, size and type of vessel, installed equipment, proposed routes of operation including frequency of port calls, cargo carried, type of service in which employed, degree of automation, use of labor saving devices, and the organizational structure of the vessel.
[CGD 81-059, 52 FR 38652, Oct. 16, 1987, as amended at CGD 81-059, 54 FR 149, Jan. 4, 1989; USCG-2006-24412, 81 FR 40100, June 20, 2016]
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.055-2 Type and model. Each life preserver specified in this subpart is a: ( a ) Standard, bib type, vinyl dip coated: ( 1 ) Model 62, adult (for persons weighing over 90 pounds); or
( 2 ) Model 66, child (for persons weighing less than 90 pounds); or
( b ) Standard, bib type, cloth covered; ( 1 ) Model 63, adult (for persons weighing over 90 pounds); or
( 2 ) Model 67, child (for persons weighing less than 90 pounds); or
( c ) Nonstandard, shaped type: ( 1 ) Model,1 adult (for persons weighing over 90 pounds); or
( 2 ) Model,[1] child (for persons weighing less than 90 pounds).
[CGD 72-163R, 38 FR 8121, Mar. 28, 1973, as amended by USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58285, Sept. 29, 2014] Footnotes -
160.055-2
[1] A model designation for each nonstandard life preserver is to be assigned by the manufacturer. That designation must be different from any standard lifesaving device designation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S AUDITED DECEMBER 31, 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              287156
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        49048
<ALLOWANCES>                                          3017
<INVENTORY>                                          25853
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   3034364
<PP&E>                                            11797896
<DEPRECIATION>                                      320091
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    15638389
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              2792066
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                            975
<COMMON>                                             32061
<OTHER-SE>                                         7441286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      15638389
<SALES>                                              90506
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   1165988
<CGS>                                               442710
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   6014033
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  663964
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (5954,719)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (5954719)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (5954719)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.23)



</TABLE>
# C_2009182EN.01007601.xml

| 4.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/76 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/76

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain components and characteristics of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors’ (Codified version)

COM(2008) 690 final — 2008/0213 COD

(2009/C 182/17)

On 8 December 2008 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 95 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain components and characteristics of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain components and characteristics of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors

(Codified version)

(Codified version)

COM(2008) 690 final — 2008/0213 COD.

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 450th plenary session of 14 and 15 January 2009 (meeting of 14 January), by 186 votes to one with seven abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 14 January 2009.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Mario SEPI

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

AHMED NAGI, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

JOHN F. KERRY, 

 Defendant. 

/ 

CIVIL NO. 2:14-13948 

HON. AVERN COHN 

MAG. JUDGE DAVID R. GRAND 

STIPULATED ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S DEADLINE FOR 

ANSWERING

Plaintiff Ahmed Nagi and Defendant John F. Kerry, by and through their 

undersigned attorneys, stipulate to entry of an order extending Defendant’s deadline to 

answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by 30 days, from December 29, 2014, to 

January 28, 2015. Accordingly, Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the 

Complaint no later than January 28, 2015. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: December 12, 2014 s/Avern Cohn 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

2:14-cv-13948-AC-DRG Doc # 9 Filed 12/12/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 37
2 

Dated: December 12, 2014 Respectfully submitted, 

COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC 

RELATIONS, MICHIGAN 

/s/ Lena Masri (by CAD with consent via 

email on 12/12/14) 

LENA F. MASRI (P73461) 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

21700 Northwestern Hwy, Ste. 815 

Southfield, MI 48075 

Phone: (248) 559-2247 

lmasri@cair.com 

JOYCE R. BRANDA 

Acting Assistant Attorney General 

WILLIAM C. PEACHEY 

Director

s/ Craig A. Defoe 

CRAIG A. DEFOE 

Indiana Bar No. 2707849 

Trial Attorney 

United States Department of Justice 

Office of Immigration Litigation 

District Court Section 

P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station 

Washington, D.C. 20044 

(202) 532-4114 

(202) 305-7000 (fax) 

craig.defoe@usdoj.gov 

Attorneys for Defendant 

2:14-cv-13948-AC-DRG Doc # 9 Filed 12/12/14 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 38
Editorial Note on Part 161
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 161 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49238, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 161.006-6 Procedure for approval. ( a ) *General.* Motor lifeboat searchlights are approved only by the Commandant (CG-ENG-4), Attn: Lifesaving and Fire Safety Division, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509. Correspondence relating to the subject matter of this specification shall be addressed to the Commander of the Coast Guard District in which the factory is located.
( b ) *Manufacturer's plans and specifications.* In order to obtain approval of motor lifeboat searchlights, submit detailed plans and specifications, including a complete bill of material, assembly drawings, and parts drawings descriptive of the arrangement and construction of the device, to the Commander of the Coast Guard District in which the factory is located. Each drawing shall have an identifying drawing number, date, and an identification of the device; and the general arrangement for assembly drawing shall include a list of all drawings applicable, together with drawing numbers and alteration numbers. The manufacturer will be advised whether or not the drawings and specifications appear satisfactory or what corrections appear necessary and then he may proceed with the construction of the pre-approval sample in accordance therewith. The pre-approval sample, together with four copies of the plans and specifications corrected as may be required, shall be forwarded to the Commandant via the Commander of the Coast Guard District in which the factory is located for inspection and tests. The cost of the tests is to be borne by the manufacturer.
[CGFR 49-43, 15 FR 127, Jan. 11, 1950, as amended by USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60160, Sept. 30, 2013]
# C_2012025EN.01004301.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/43

---

Appeal brought on 25 November 2011 against the Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 20 September 2011 in Case T-267/10 Land Wien v European Commission

(Case C-608/11 P)

(2012/C 25/80)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Land Wien (represented by: W.-G. Schärf, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court of Justice should:

| — | revise the order of the General Court of the European Union (Sixth Chamber) of 20 September 2011 in Case T-267/10 so as to take full account of the substance of its claim; |
| --- | --- |

—

revise the order of the General Court of the European Union (Sixth Chamber) of 20 September 2011 in Case T-267/10 so as to take full account of the substance of its claim;

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings at first instance and on appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings at first instance and on appeal.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

The appeal has been brought against the order to the General Court of 20 September 2011, by which that court dismissed the appellant's action seeking, essentially, the annulment of the Commission's decision of 25 March 2010 to discontinue the procedure relating to the appellant's complaint concerning a plan to expand units 3 an 4 of the Mochovce nuclear power plant in the Slovak Republic, and a declaration that the Commission has failed to act, within the meaning of Article 265 TFEU, since it failed to communicate all of the documents requested in that regard in infringement of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents. (1)

The General Court infringed the Euratom Treaty in failing to interpret it in the light of the TFEU. The General Court failed to recognise that the TFEU declares as a legally enforceable right the right of access to documents laid down in Article 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, on which the appellant may rely directly to obtain from the Commission all the information which it retained in relation to the expansion of the nuclear power station in Mochovce.

Contrary to what the General Court found, the Commission's letter in response to the question put by the appellant constitutes a challengeable decision for the purposes of Article 263 TFEU. This results from the settled case-law of the Court of Justice and in particular from its judgment of 11 November 1981 in Case 60/81 (IBM).

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43.

---
§ 167.40-45 Magnetic compass and gyrocompass. ( a ) All mechanically propelled vessels in ocean or coastwise service must be fitted with a magnetic compass.
( b ) All mechanically propelled vessels of 1,600 gross tons and over in ocean or coastwise service must be fitted with a gyrocompass in addition to the magnetic compass.
( c ) Each vessel must have an illuminated repeater for the gyrocompass required under paragraph (b) of this section that is at the main steering stand unless the gyrocompass is illuminated and is at the main steering stand.
[CGD 75-074, 42 FR 5964, Jan. 31, 1977]
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.419 Design vapor pressure.

The Po of an integral tank must not exceed 24.5 kPa gauge (3.55 psig) unless special approval by the Commandant (CG-ENG) allows a Po between 24.5 kPa gauge (3.55 psig) and 69 kPa gauge (10 psig).

[CGD 74-289, 44 FR 26009, May 3, 1979, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4782, Feb. 3, 1983]