alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Foster v. People.

*Criminal evidence. "Burglary—evidence of theft of articles not named in indictment. Objection*— *to evidence on untenable ground.*

At the trial of an indictment for burglary in the third degree, in entering and taking from a store certain articles, the fact that certain cigars which were not mentioned in the indictment, had disappeared with the articles set forth, was allowed to he proved. *Held,*that the evidence, was admissible as a circumstance showing the nature and extent of the burglary.

A box of, burglars’ tools were introduced by the prosecution. The prisoner objected on the ground that the prisoner was in no way proven to be connected with them, which was not a fact. *Held,*that a motion to strike out the testimony oí a witness describing these tools, made after the prosecution had rested, was properly denied.

Ebbob to the court of general sessions of the city and county of New York, to review the conviction of Thomas Poster, for burglary in the third degree.

*Wm. F. Howe,*for' plaintiff in error.

*Benjamin H. Phelps,*for the people.

Daniels, J.

The head-note states the only points passed upon in the opinion.

*Judgment affirmed.*
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 82 (Monday, April 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21271-21277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2106]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[FDA 225-07-8001]


Memorandum of Understanding Between the National Cancer Institute 
and the Food and Drug Administration

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is providing notice of 
a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between FDA and the National Cancer 
Institute (NCI), part of the National Institutes of Health of the 
Department of Health and Human Services. The purpose of this MOU is to 
establish a formal collaboration between FDA and NCI regarding 
proteomics science and technology to accelerate proteomics technology 
development and application in clinical settings. FDA and NCI intend to 
collaborate in areas involving proteomics such as: Sample collection, 
preparation, storage and processing; bioinformatics and data analysis; 
discovery and validation of biomarkers; and surrogate biomarkers of 
cancer development and drug response, including standardization among 
technology platforms and assay standards development.

DATES: The agreement became effective April 5, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Francis Kalush, Center for Devices and Radiological Health (HFZ-440), 
Food and Drug Administration, 2098 Gaither Rd., Rockville, MD 20850, 
240-276-0996, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ed8b9f8c838e849ec3868c81989e85ad8b898cc385859ec38a829b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c2a4b0a3aca1abb1eca9a3aeb7b1aa82a4a6a3ecaaaab1eca5adb4">[email protected]</span></a>.
    or Henry Rodriguez, Office of the Director, (MSC-2580), National 
Cancer Institute, 31 Center Dr., rm. 10A52, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-
496-1550.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 20.108(c), which 
states that all written agreements and MOUs between FDA and others 
shall be published in the Federal Register, the agency is publishing 
notice of this MOU.

    Dated: April 20, 2007.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30AP07.017


[[Page 21272]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30AP07.018


[[Page 21273]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30AP07.019


[[Page 21274]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30AP07.020


[[Page 21275]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30AP07.021


[[Page 21276]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30AP07.022


[[Page 21277]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30AP07.023

[FR Doc. 07-2106 Filed 4-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-C


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2013156EN.01004003.xml

| 1.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2013 — Luna v OHIM — Asteris (Al bustan)

(Case T-454/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community figurative mark Al bustan - Earlier national figurative mark ALBUSTAN - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 57(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 156/74

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luna International Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Asteris Industrial and Commercial Company SA (Athens, Greece)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 May 2011 (Case R 1358/2008-2), concerning invalidity proceedings between Asteris Industrial and Commercial Company SA and Luna International Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Luna International Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Luna International Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 319, 29.10.2011.

1

---
#### § 159.001-2 Right of appeal.

Any person directly affected by a decision or action taken under this subchapter, by or on behalf of the Coast Guard, may appeal to the Deputy for Operations Policy and Capabilities (CG-DCO-D) as provided in § 1.03-15 of this chapter.

[CGD 93-055, 61 FR 13927, Mar. 28, 1996, as amended by CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50733, Sept. 27, 1996; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012]
# C_2011282EN.01000202.xml

| 24.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/2

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 20 June 2011 — Grattan plc v The Commissioners of Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs

(Case C-310/11)

2011/C 282/03

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Grattan plc

Applicant:

Defendant: The Commissioners of Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

In relation to the period before 1 January 1978, does a taxable person have a directly effective right under Article 8(a) of the Second Council Directive of 11 April 1967 (67/228/EEC (1)), and/or the principles of fiscal neutrality and of equal treatment, to treat the basis of assessment of a supply of goods as retrospectively reduced where, after the time of that supply of goods, the recipient of the supply received a credit from the supplier which the recipient then elected either to take as a payment of money, or as a credit against amounts owed to the supplier in respect of supplies of goods to the recipient that had already taken place?

1

---

(1)  Second Council Directive 67/228/EEC of 11 April 1967 on the harmonisation of legislation of Member States concerning turnover taxes — Structure and procedures for application of the common system of value added tax

1

OJ 71, p. 1303

---
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.3

                                STATE OF DELAWARE
                       CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

-     THE UNDERSIGNED, desiring to form a limited partnership pursuant to the
      Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, 6 Delaware Code, Chapter
      17, do/does hereby certify as follows:

-     FIRST: The name of the limited partnership is FNB Financial Services, LP.

-     SECOND: The address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is
      103 Foulk Road, Suite 200, in the City of Wilmington, County of New
      Castle, State of Delaware, 19803. The name of the Registered Agent at such
      address is Entity Services Group, LLC #9272016.

-     THIRD: The name and mailing address of the general partner is as follows:

                    Regency Consumer Financial Services Inc.
                            103 Foulk Road, Suite 202
                           Wilmington, Delaware 19803

-     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of
      Limited Partnership of FNB Financial Services, LP as of December 3, 2004.

                                        Regency Consumer Financial Services Inc.

                                        /s/ Donald W. Phillips, Jr.
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        By:  Donald W. Phillips, Jr.
                                        Its: President

                                                GENERAL PARTNER
# C_2011103EN.01002401.xml

| 2.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/24

---

Action brought on 26 January 2011 — Kraft Foods Global Brands v OHIM — Fenaco (SUISSE PREMIUM)

(Case T-60/11)

2011/C 103/42

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kraft Foods Global Brands LLC (Northfield, USA) (represented by M. de Justo Bailey, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Fenaco Genossenschaft (Berne, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 November 2010, in Case R 522/2010-1, and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 November 2010, in Case R 522/2010-1, and

| — | Order the defendant and the co-defendant to bear the cost of the procedure. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant and the co-defendant to bear the cost of the procedure.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: Fenaco Genossenschaft.

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark applied for: Figurative mark ‘SUISSE PREMIUM’ for goods and services of Classes 30, 31 and 42.

Community trade mark applied for:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the Applicant.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Figurative mark ‘PREMIUM’ for goods of Class 30.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition dismissed.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1), as there is a likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
# C_2011238EN.01003401.xml

| 13.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/34

---

Action brought on 21 June 2011 — Morelli v OHIM — Brambilla (Partito della Libertà)

(Case T-322/11)

2011/C 238/58

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Raffaello Morelli (Livorno, Italy) (represented by: G.Brenelli, lawyer

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Michela Vittoria Brambilla (Milan, Italy

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the First Board of Appeal’s decision of 17 May 2011 and that of the Opposition Division of 14 May 2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the First Board of Appeal’s decision of 17 May 2011 and that of the Opposition Division of 14 May 2010;

| — | declare that the applicant’s opposition to the application for registration of a trade mark No 6.203.012 is upheld and refuse the application for that mark; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the applicant’s opposition to the application for registration of a trade mark No 6.203.012 is upheld and refuse the application for that mark;

| — | order Ms Michela Vittoria Brambilli to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Ms Michela Vittoria Brambilli to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Michela Vittoria Brambilla.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the word element ‘Partito della Libertà’ (application for registration No 5.6203.012), for goods and services in classes 9, 14, 16, 24, 25, 35, 36, 38, 41, 42 and 45.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Raffaello Morelli

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Domain name ‘partitodellaliberta.it’, assigned by the Autorità proposta all’assegnazione dei domini ‘it’ to Raffaello Morelli on 9 August 2004, which the opponents claimed was used in the course of trade for goods and services in classes 16, 35, 38, 41 and 45

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Misapplication of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark, incorrect appraisal of ‘use in the course of trade’ with reference to a name used in the sphere of politics and incorrect appraisal of the documents proving business use of the earlier sign.

Pleas in law:

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of clarification of a report prepared for the draft environmental impact statement for the Tongass Land and Resource Management Plan Amendment.

# SUMMARY:

                        A clarification to the Timber Markets Update and Analysis of an Integrated Southeast Alaska Forest Products Industry prepared for the Tongass Land and Resource Management Plan Amendment Draft Environmental Impact Statement is available for review and comment on the following Web site:                         *http://tongass-fpadjust.net/​Documents/​McDowellGroupLetter-2006.pdf.*

# DATES:

Any comments on this report may be included with those on Tongass Land and Resource Management Plan Draft Environmental Impact Statement. The 90-day comment period began on January 12, 2007. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Lee Kramer, Project Team Leader, Forestry Science Laboratory, 2770 Sherwood Land, Suite 2A, Juneau, AK 99801-8545, phone: (907) 586-8811, ext. 225, or e-mail                         *lkramer@fs.fed.us.*                         Additional information is available on the Tongass Forest Plan Adjustment Internet site at                         *www.tongass-fpadjust.net.*

Dated: January 10, 2007.

Paul K. Brewster,

Deputy Regional Forester.

[FR Doc. 07-200  Filed 1-18-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0001007020
<NAME> INTEGRATED SYSTEMS CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,505
<SECURITIES>                                        97
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,761
<ALLOWANCES>                                       307
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,430
<PP&E>                                           5,409
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,020
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,432
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,230
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,156
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,432
<SALES>                                         19,098
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,098
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,912
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,415
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,014
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,401
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,401
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16


</TABLE>
#### Owen Taffany, *Appellant, v.*The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, *Respondent*.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Gil- ' bert, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.1806 Regulations on board.

No person may operate a U.S. flag vessel unless a copy of this part and a copy of Part 35 of this chapter are on board.
§ 190.15-10 Ventilation for closed spaces. ( a ) All enclosed spaces within the vessel shall be properly vented or ventilated. Means shall be provided to close off all vents and ventilators.
( b ) Means shall be provided for stopping all fans in ventilation systems serving the chemical laboratories, scientific laboratories, chemical storerooms, and machinery spaces and for closing all doorways, ventilators, and annular spaces around funnels and other openings to such spaces, from outside these spaces, in case of fire.
( c ) See §§ 194.15-5 and 194.20-5 of this subchapter for ventilation of chemical laboratories, scientific laboratories, and storerooms.
Case 5:15-cv-10141-JEL-APP ECF No. 1, PageID.1 Filed 01/14/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 5:15-cv-10141-JEL-APP ECF No. 1, PageID.2 Filed 01/14/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 5:15-cv-10141-JEL-APP ECF No. 1, PageID.3 Filed 01/14/15 Page 3 of 3
# C_2013055EN.01001001.xml

| 23.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/10

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 January 2013 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-54/11) (1)

1

(ERDF - Reduction of financial assistance - Aid for the operational programme falling within Objective 1 (2000-2006) concerning the region of Andalucía (Spain) - Article 39(3)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 - Three-month period - Directive 93/36/EEC - Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a tender notice)

2013/C 55/15

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented initially by: M. Muñoz Pérez, subsequently by S. Martínez-Lage Sobredo, and finally by A. Rubio González and N. Díaz Abad, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Steiblytė and J. Baquero Cruz, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 7700 final of 16 November 2010 reducing the assistance from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) to the Objective 1 integrated operational programme for Andalucía (2000-2006), in so far as it imposes a financial correction of 100 % on the ERDF-financed expenditure for contracts no 2075/2003 and no 2120/2005.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 12.3.2011.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2344 Received in Senate (RDS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2344

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 10, 2009

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend section 114 of title 17, United States Code, to provide for 
agreements for the reproduction and performance of sound recordings by 
                              webcasters.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Webcaster Settlement Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF AGREEMENTS.

    Section 114(f)(5) of title 17, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ``2008'' and inserting 
        ``2008, the Webcaster Settlement Act of 2009,'';
            (2) in subparagraph (E)(iii), by striking ``to make 
        eligible nonsubscription transmissions and ephemeral 
        recordings''; and
            (3) in subparagraph (F), by striking ``February 15, 2009'' 
        and inserting ``at 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on the 30th day 
        after the date of the enactment of the Webcaster Settlement Act 
        of 2009''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 9, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```