alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### 25

**OFFICE OF**  **THE Al-l-ORNEY**  **GENERAL OF~TEXAS**  **AUSTIN aRovER**  **SEIJSRS AIlDI** **” CI**  **QD(cnAL**‘3 &

Honorable Joe I).

Br~wnlne, pace 2 :

“2. l&t Is 'roadmaint&anag or batternmnt *e?k* althin the pro,qiaiona'ofthe Apt? Otherwise state4;would thework, say, to create a three lane highway Of *whatformerly was a two lane highway be 'roadmair,tenanoeor betterment world exempt from the requireffienta of the A&? :~ou.ld the work, my, to change the road 

### rr0= an earth gra46a road to a surfaoed road be *rod malntenanoe or betterment work* exempt from the requirements of the Ao.t? “3; 

### mm2.a statutes, Art. 2368a, requires oompttitive **bidding~ror** oondtructitiaa materials. i&y the.

Comtdssioners* Court l&&t the bidding to..materials

from a gartia;ilar loaallty by designating its geographical name, *BLankrilb ~Gravel*,~ormust th% &ravel or other material, not patented, be speoiiied by other charaoter-

_. .fetice&o 8s to permit~blda on other like

lua'tsrials

from other geo&raphioal &ocat.ion?*'

:Be&Ion 19,Artlole 32718, V. L G. S., providea:

' 'After the first day or January, 1938, it shall ~~b~'&lawfulror th%s State, or.for any OS its polltloal ddloislons, for allgaaunty, dty, or'td+n,,t6 @a$age : ~.i@;the

oonetruetionof eny'public rork~inrolving.pr& ieesiona1 engineering;'rhereyublio.'bealth,"publio,-: ' -~,;~ welfare or .publlosafety is invOlvea,, unless the"' engineering plane and speoifications ana eatbate have .beenprepared by, and tha engineering 'oonstrua-. tiorfs tO.ba executed under the direct supervision **.or** a registeradpr0re8sionai anginasr; p333qiuea, that nothing inthis Aat shall be held t0 apglg to any publlo.wotik

wherein the aentemplated expenditure for the aompletedprojeot does not exceed Three Thousand(~3,000.00)Dollara. Provided, that this Aot ahall not apply t.0 any road aainteniinoe or betterment work undertaken by t&e County comrnlssionera' Court."
We note that in the above c;uotedseotioa, the provisions OS the Aot 8re not applloablewhen the work is ?road.maintenanae or betterment work" undertaken by the County Commiasloners* Cour,t. In the oaae of Dallas County et al vs. ?lowman, '(Sup.Ct.) ?I S-3..23. . .
‘: 

### 32
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 25, 2013

h0617 

# Order

Clerk June 25, 2013

146308

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146308

COA: 310515

Wayne CC: 08

- 009824

- FC

LAMAR CLINTON CRAIG,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 8, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, b ecause the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 17925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1766]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Loan Repayment Program--Meeting 1.
    Date: May 1-2, 2007.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Ellen S. Buczko, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge 
Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-2676, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6b0e091e081100045a2b05020a020f45050203450c041d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ddb8bfa8bea7b6b2ec9db3b4bcb4b9f3b3b4b5f3bab2ab">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)


    Dated: April 4, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1766 Filed 4-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0001007020
<NAME> INTEGRATED SYSTEMS CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           8,730
<SECURITIES>                                     2,537
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,787
<ALLOWANCES>                                       196
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,812
<PP&E>                                           4,365
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,430
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,844
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,084
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            46
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,844
<SALES>                                         30,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,607
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,691
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,270
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,266
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,004
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,004
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.19

Summary of Loan  Agreement by and between  Shenzhen BAK Battery Co.,  Ltd.  (the
"Company")  and  Longgang   Division,   Shenzhen   Development  Bank  ("Shenzhen
Development Bank") dated as of April 1, 2004.

         The contract  number for this  agreement is Shenfa  Longgang  Daizi NO.
200403055.  The contract term is April 1, 2004 to April 1, 2005,  and the amount
of credit to be extended by Shenzhen  Development Bank is RMB 100,000,000  Yuan.
This agreement is  conditioned  upon the execution of the  Comprehensive  Credit
Facilities  Agreement as summarized in Exhibit  10.12.  Remedies in the event of
breach of contract include the suspension of unused credit,  the calling back of
the loan principal in whole or part before  maturity,  the imposition of penalty
interest and compound interest and compensation for loss. The agreement provides
that the loan shall not be used by the Company for the  distribution  of profits
and that the Company cannot mortgage its new factory and dormitory  buildings to
a third party.  In the event that any of the foregoing  should  occur,  the loan
becomes mature immediately.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 73 (Tuesday, April 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1913]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500.1]


In the Matter of Certain Companies Quoted on the Pink Sheets: 
Amerossi EC, Inc., Irwin Resources, Inc., Peopleline Telecom, Inc.; 
Order of Suspension of Trading

April 13, 2007.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
the issuers listed below. As set forth below for each issuer, questions 
have arisen regarding the adequacy and accuracy of publicly 
disseminated information concerning, among other things: (1) The 
companies' assets, (2) the companies' business operations, (3) the 
companies' current financial condition, and/or (4) financing 
arrangements involving the issuance of the companies' shares.
    1. Amerossi EC, Inc. is a Wyoming company with offices in Bangkok, 
Thailand. Questions have arisen regarding the adequacy and accuracy of 
press releases concerning the company's operations.
    2. Irwin Resources, Inc., is a Delaware company with offices in 
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Questions have arisen regarding 
the adequacy and accuracy of press releases concerning the company's 
current financial condition, management, operations, and transactions 
involving the issuance of the company's shares.
    3. Peopleline Telecom, Inc. is a Nevada company based in Los 
Angeles, California. Questions have arisen regarding the adequacy and 
accuracy of press releases concerning the company's operations and 
concerning stock promoting activity.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the companies listed above.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the 
companies listed above is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT, 
April 13, 2007, through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on April 26, 2007.

    By the Commission.
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-1913 Filed 4-13-07; 12:56 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
§ 131.580 Servicing of inflatable liferafts, inflatable lifejackets, inflatable buoyant apparatus, and inflated rescue boats. ( a ) An inflatable liferaft or inflatable buoyant apparatus must be serviced at a facility specifically approved by the Commandant for the particular brand, and in accordance with servicing procedures meeting the requirements of part 160, subpart 160.151, of this chapter— ( 1 ) No later than the month and year on its servicing sticker affixed under 46 CFR 160.151-57(n), except that servicing may be delayed until the next scheduled inspection of the vessel, provided that the delay does not exceed 5 months; and
( 2 ) Whenever the container is damaged or the container straps or seals are broken.
( b ) Each inflatable lifejacket and hybrid inflatable lifejacket or work vest must be serviced: ( 1 ) Within 12 months of its initial packing; and
( 2 ) Within 12 months of each subsequent servicing, except that servicing may be delayed until the next scheduled inspection of the OSV, provided that the delay does not exceed 5 months.
( c ) Each inflatable lifejacket must be serviced in compliance with subpart 160.176 of this chapter.
( d ) Each hybrid inflatable lifejacket or work vest must be serviced in accordance with the manual provided under § 160.077-29 of this chapter.
( e ) Repair and maintenance of inflatable rescue boats must follow the manufacturers' instructions. Each repair, except an emergency repair made aboard the vessel, must be made at a servicing facility approved by the Commandant (CG-ENG).
[CGD 82-004 and CGD 86-074, 62 FR 49340, Sept. 19, 1997, as amended by USCG-2002-11118, 67 FR 58541, Sept. 17, 2002; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59782, Oct. 1, 2012]
# C_2015262EN.01001501.xml

| 10.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2015 — Polytetra v OHIM — EI du Pont de Nemours (POLYTETRAFLON)

(Case T-660/11) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark POLYTETRAFLON - Earlier Community word mark TEFLON - No genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Final product incorporating a component - Use of the earlier mark in respect of the final products of third parties - Duty to state reasons))

(2015/C 262/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Polytetra GmbH (Mönchengladbach, Germany) (represented by: R. Schiffer, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: EI du Pont de Nemours and Company (Wilmington, United States) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 September 2011 (Case R 2005/2010-1) concerning opposition proceedings between EI du Pont de Nemours and Company and Polytetra GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 29 September 2011 (Case R 2005/2010-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 29 September 2011 (Case R 2005/2010-1);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Polytetra GmbH; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Polytetra GmbH;

| 3. | Orders EI du Pont de Nemours and Company to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders EI du Pont de Nemours and Company to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 3.3.2012.

1

---
§ 195.07-5 Ocean, coastwise, or Great Lakes service. ( a ) Vessels in ocean, coastwise, or Great Lakes service shall be fitted with anchors, chains, and hawsers which shall be in general agreement with the standards established by the American Bureau of Shipping, see subpart 188.35 of part 188 of this subchapter.
( b ) In addition to the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, the following requirements and alternatives also apply: ( 1 ) The American Bureau of Shipping rules relating to anchor equipment are mandatory, not a guide.
( 2 ) Vessels under 200 feet (61 meters) in length and with an American Bureau of Shipping equipment number of less than 150 may be equipped with either: ( i ) One anchor of the tabular weight and one-half the tabulated length of anchor chain listed in the applicable standard, or
( ii ) Two anchors of one-half the tabular weight with the total length of anchor chain listed in the applicable standard provided both anchors are in a position that allows for ready use at all times and the windlass is capable of heaving in either anchor.
( c ) Standards of other recognized classification societies may be used, in lieu of those established by the American Bureau of Shipping, upon approval by the Commandant.
[CGFR 67-83, 33 FR 1156, Jan. 27, 1968, as amended by CGD 87-013, 53 FR 20624, June 6, 1988]
§ 167.65-35 Use of auto pilot. Except as provided in 33 CFR 164.15, when the automatic pilot is used in— ( a ) Areas of high traffic density;
( b ) Conditions of restricted visibility; and
( c ) All other hazardous navigational situations, the master shall ensure that— ( 1 ) It is possible to immediately establish human control of the ship's steering:
( 2 ) A competent person is ready at all times to take over steering control; and
( 3 ) The changeover from automatic to manual steering and vice versa is made by, or under, the supervision of the officer of the watch.
[CGFR 75-074, 42 FR 5964, Jan. 17, 1977]
# C_2011232EN.01001901.xml

| 6.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/19

---

Action brought on 31 May 2011 — European Commission v Czech Republic

(Case C-269/11)

(2011/C 232/31)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Lozano Palacios and M. Šimerdová, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Czech Republic

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by permitting travel agencies, pursuant to Paragraph 89 of Law No 235/2004 Coll. on Value Added Tax, to apply the special scheme for travel agents to the provision of travel services to persons other than travellers, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 306 to 310 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by permitting travel agencies, pursuant to Paragraph 89 of Law No 235/2004 Coll. on Value Added Tax, to apply the special scheme for travel agents to the provision of travel services to persons other than travellers, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 306 to 310 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax

| — | order the Czech Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Czech Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In the Czech Republic the special scheme of VAT for travel agents introduced by Articles 306 to 310 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC is applied not only to supplies provided by travel agents to travellers but also to supplies provided to persons other than travellers. Pursuant to Paragraph 89 of Law No 235/2004 Coll. on Value Added Tax, the special scheme is also applied in the Czech Republic where a travel service is provided to a legal person which sells that service on to other travel agents. In the opinion of the Commission, that is contrary to the provisions of Articles 306 to 310 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC, which require the special scheme for travel agents to be used only in cases where a travel service is supplied to a traveller. The wording of Articles 306 to 310 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC, and the objective which those provisions pursue, support the position of the Commission.

---
§ 194.20-5 Ventilation. ( a ) Chemical storerooms shall be equipped with a power ventilation system of exhaust type. The system shall have a capacity sufficient to effect a complete change of air in not more than 4 minutes based upon the volume of the compartment. ( 1 ) Power ventilation units shall have nonsparking impellers and shall not produce a source of vapor ignition in either the compartment or the ventilation system associated with the compartment.
( 2 ) This ventilation system shall be independent of any other ventilation system. It shall serve no other space in the vessel. It shall be of watertight construction.
( 3 ) Inlets to exhaust ducts shall be provided and located at points where concentration of vapors may be expected. Ventilation exhaust outlets shall terminate more than 6 feet from any opening to the interior part of the vessel and from any possible source of vapor ignition. Terminals shall be fitted with acceptable flame screens.
( 4 ) The control for the power ventilation system shall be conveniently located and marked in a manner to clearly identify the purpose of the control.
( b ) Provisions shall be made so that the chemical storeroom will be ventilated before it is entered. An Indicator shall be provided outside the space to show that ventilation is being provided. In addition, the storeroom shall be marked “Danger—Ventilate Before Entering.”
§ 189.30-1 General or partial survey. ( a ) A survey, either general or partial, according to the circumstances, shall be made every time an accident occurs or a defect is discovered which affects the safety of the vessel or the efficacy or completeness of its lifesaving appliances, firefighting or other equipment, or whenever any important repairs or renewals are made. The survey shall be such as to insure that the necessary repairs or renewals have been effectively made, that the material and the workmanship of such repairs or renewals are in all respects satisfactory, and that the vessel complies in all respects with the regulations in this subchapter.
90° W.

88° W.

88° W. 86° W.

86° W.

84° W.

84° W.

82° W.

82° W.

80° W.

80° W.

78° W.

78° W.

76° W.

76° W.

74° W.

34° N.

36° N.

36° N.

38° N.

38° N.

40° N.

40° N.

42° N.

32° N.

 

34° N.

EXPLANATION

Appalachian basin

Black Warrior basin

Dunkard basin

Pocahontas basin

Wartburg basin

Eastern Interior (Illinois) basin

Gulf Coastal Plain

Northern edge of Cretaceous onlap

Fault

Arch or dome—Dashed where inferred

0 25 50 75 100 MILES

0 50 100 150 KILOMETERS

 Cincinnati arch 

 Findlay arch 

Lexington dome

Pine Mountain thrust fault

Mississippi embayment

Nashville dome

Allegheny structural front

Allegheny structural front

CONNECTICUT

NEW YORK

PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

ILLINOIS

NORTH CAROLINA

SOUTH CAROLINA

DELAWARE

WEST VIRGINIA

MISSISSIPPI

ALABAMA

GEORGIA

MICHIGAN

OHIO

VIRGINIA

KENTUCKY

INDIANA

NEW

JERSEY

TENNESSEE

Figure 3. Location of major structural features and the regional basins within the Appalachian basin. Boundaries of the Appalachian, Dunkard, and Pocahontas basins are modified 

from USGS National Oil and Gas Assessment province boundaries. Partial coverage of the Black Warrior basin, Gulf Coastal Plain, and the Eastern Interior (Illinois) basin are from 

the same source. The northeast-trending Allegheny structural front generally defines the eastern edge of the Appalachian basin and separates the Appalachian basin and the Valley 

and Ridge province. The Black Warrior basin contains coal resources that have historically been included within the Appalachian basin coal resource base. The basin occurs within 

the structural recess between the Appalachian and Ouachita Mountains (off the map to the west of the Mississippi embayment). The Black Warrior basin is bounded to the east by 

the western edge of the Appalachians and to the south and west by Cretaceous and Tertiary sediments of the Mississippi embayment and the Gulf Coastal Plain. These sediments 

onlap and cover Pennsylvanian rocks to the south and west of the Black Warrior basin. 

U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010−5152

0 25 50 75 100 MILES