alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013009EN.01003602.xml

| 12.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 November 2012 — Phonebook of the World v OHIM — Seat Pagine Gialle (PAGINE GIALLE)

(Case T-589/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark PAGINE GIALLE - Absolute grounds for refusal - Distinctive character - Lack of descriptive character - No signs or indications which have become customary - Article 7(1)(b) to (d) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009)

2013/C 9/64

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Phonebook of the World (Paris, France) (represented by: A. Bertrand, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Seat Pagine Gialle SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: F. Jacobacci, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 August 2011 (Case R 1541/2010-2), relating to invalidity proceedings between Phonebook of the World and Seat Pagine Gialle SpA.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Phonebook of the World to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Phonebook of the World to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.

1

---
# C_2011252EN.01002602.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/26

---

Action brought on 5 July 2011 — European Commission v Czech Republic

(Case C-353/11)

2011/C 252/49

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: E. Manhaeve and M. Thomannová-Körnerová, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Czech Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt all the necessary legal and administrative measures necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2010/5/EU of 8 February 2010 amending Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council to include acrolein as an active substance in Annex I thereto (1), or in any event by failing to notify the Commission of such measures, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt all the necessary legal and administrative measures necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2010/5/EU of 8 February 2010 amending Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council to include acrolein as an active substance in Annex I thereto (1), or in any event by failing to notify the Commission of such measures, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Czech Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Czech Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The prescribed period for transposing the directive into domestic law expired on 31 August 2010.

---

(1)  OJ 2010 L 36, p. 24

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         517,852
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,497,639
<ALLOWANCES>                                    35,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,896,161
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,957,652
<PP&E>                                       4,843,569
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,295,342
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,899,865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,802,559
<BONDS>                                      2,379,501
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    15,145,037
<OTHER-SE>                                (11,427,232)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,899,865
<SALES>                                      5,272,547
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,272,547
<CGS>                                        4,357,010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,831,089
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                34,613
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             473,811
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,261,416)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,261,416)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.97)
        

</TABLE>
3 6 0 0

3 3 0 0

1 2 0 0

9 0

1 8 0 0

1 5 0 0

1 5 0 0

9 0 0

1 5 0 0

2 1 0 0

1 5 0 0

2 4 0 0

1 2 0 0

1 8 0 0

1 8 0 0

3 6 0 0

3 3 0 0

1 2 0 0

9 0

1 8 0 0

1 5 0 0

1 5 0 0

9 0 0

1 5 0 0

2 1 0 0

1 5 0 0

2 4 0 0

1 2 0 0

1 8 0 0

1 8 0 0

10 0

10 0

30 0

30 0

10 0

10 0

30 0

30 0

10

Catfish Lake

Bainbridge 

Island

 

Cottage Lake

Vasa Park

Saddle MntPrice Lake

Sunset Beach

Frigid Creek

SEATTLE

TACOMA

Puget Sound

SEATTLE UPLIFT

SEATTLE FAULT ZONE1

TACOMA FAULT ZONE1,2,3

HOOD

CANAL

FAU

LT1

SOUTH WHIDBEY ISLAND FAULT ZONE1,4,5

SADDLE MNT

FAULT ZONE1

123°15’ 123° 122°30’ 122°

47°19’

47°30’

47°50’

10 Miles

10 Km 1:400,000

INSET MAP 14: SUMMARY OF SHALLOW FAULT DEFORMATION DATA AND QUATERNARY

FAULT TRACES IN SEATTLE/TACOMA REGION, DRAPED OVER RESIDUAL AEROMAGNETIC ANOMALIES

 

 Holocene-active faults documented by

 paleoseismic studies 

 Quaternary-active faults

 (Holocene activity unknown or uncertain)

 1 USGS Quatermary Fault Database 

 2

Brocher and others, 2001 

 3Johnson and others, 2004c

 4Sherrod, and others, 2008

 5Kelsey and others, 2004

 

Sources for fault trace locations (also see Table 1):

 QUATERNARY FAULT TRACES

Johnson and others, 1999

Pratt and others, 1997

Johnson and others, 2004c

Deformation interpreted on 

seismic lines to result from motion 

on Quaternary fault systems

Contour lines denote thickness of 

unconsolidated Puget Sound basin deposits

(Jones, 1996)

Aeromagnetic lineament along 

South Whidbey Island Fault Zone

(Sherrod and others, 2008)

Locations of sharp gravity contrasts, 

estimated from gravity anomalies

Paleoseismic coastal 

Sherrod 1998, 2001:

 Uplifted site

 Subsided site

EXPLANATION

 LiDAR-identified fault scarp

Paleoseismic trench (see text

and Table 2 for references)

Residual Magnetic 

Anomaly (nT)

Blakely and others, 1999

7.8

3.6

2.0

1.1

0.5

0.0

-0.3

-0.6

-0.9

-1.2

-1.6

-2.1

-2.8

-4.2

-7.1

Magnitude 5.0 4.0 3.0 

Depth 0-35 km

Earthquakes 1970-present, Pacific 

Northwest Seismic Network (PNSN)
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2017 (the "Form 10-Q") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").



I, Heather D. Brolick, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Issuer, certify that to my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 14, 2017



| | /s/ Heather D. Brolick               
| | -------------------------------------
| | Heather D. Brolick                   
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2017 (the "Form 10-Q") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").



I, Tracey A. Welsh, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary and Treasurer of the Issuer, certify that to my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 14, 2017



| | /s/ Tracey A. Welsh                                                    
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Tracey A. Welsh                                                        
| | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
2:14-cv-14520-PDB-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 11/26/14 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 1
2:14-cv-14520-PDB-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 11/26/14 Pg 2 of 8 Pg ID 2
2:14-cv-14520-PDB-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 11/26/14 Pg 3 of 8 Pg ID 3
2:14-cv-14520-PDB-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 11/26/14 Pg 4 of 8 Pg ID 4
2:14-cv-14520-PDB-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 11/26/14 Pg 5 of 8 Pg ID 5
2:14-cv-14520-PDB-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 11/26/14 Pg 6 of 8 Pg ID 6
2:14-cv-14520-PDB-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 11/26/14 Pg 7 of 8 Pg ID 7
2:14-cv-14520-PDB-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 11/26/14 Pg 8 of 8 Pg ID 8
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2303 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the restriction 

on reducing Federal income tax refunds for past-due State income tax 

obligations of out-of-state residents in the case of States with reciprocal 

agreements with the Federal Government to reduce State income tax 

refunds for Federal income tax obligations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2009 

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia (for himself, Mr. RANGEL, and Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate 

the restriction on reducing Federal income tax refunds 

for past-due State income tax obligations of out-of-state 

residents in the case of States with reciprocal agreements 

with the Federal Government to reduce State income 

tax refunds for Federal income tax obligations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Tax Administra5 tion Assistance Act of 2009’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2303 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF RESTRICTION ON REDUCING FED2 ERAL INCOME TAX REFUNDS FOR PAST-DUE 

3 STATE INCOME TAX OBLIGATIONS OF OUT4 OF-STATE RESIDENTS IN THE CASE OF 

5 STATES WITH RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS 

6 WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO RE7 DUCE STATE INCOME TAX REFUNDS FOR 

8 FEDERAL INCOME TAX OBLIGATIONS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 6402(e) 

10 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

11 (1) by striking ‘‘Paragraph (1)’’ and inserting 

12 the following: 

13 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1)’’, and 

14 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub15 paragraph: 

16 ‘‘(B) EXCEPTION FOR STATES WHICH

17 HAVE RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS WITH SEC18 RETARY.—Subparagraph (A) shall not apply 

19 with respect to any State seeking an offset if 

20 such State has in effect a reciprocal agreement 

21 with the Secretary under which such State 

22 agrees to offset the amount of any overpayment 

23 of State income tax payable to any person by 

24 the amount of any Federal income tax obliga25 tion of such person under a program similar to 

26 the program described in paragraph (1).’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2303 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

3 of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
**OFFICE OF**  **THE AlTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN**  **QROVER SELLERS**  **&rro ”** **~n GENIRAI.** 



### ~&UT letter'of

October of this depaNnent. pmwnta the 

### quoeat - -- .
office1Hon. Oeorge ii. Cox - Page 2

Article 1003 of said statutes provides:

raon other 

### than an elector reafdent of the be appointed to any office by the city cowail.” Article 2927

### of eaid statutes prov,videe: *No

### person shall be eligible to anyState, county, precinct or rmqicipal ofi%% 

### in thie S,tate unlees he ahall be eligible to hold office under the Constitution of this State, andunlese he &all have 

### rseidsdin this Stats for the period*of twelve months*andsix months in the county, preofnet, or municipality, in which he offers himself aa a candidate, next preceding auygenafel or 8 u tlsen 

### of said county, 

### precinet ozmunicipality for snore r cial election, aad shall have.been au aotual bona fide than six munt.hsr 110person iAel&ible to hold office shall ever have kio -6 placed upon the ballot at anygerm-al or speciel eleation, or at 8ny prisary electSon where oandidates are selected under prlmry eleotion laws of 

### thh State; andA06UO&

%Mii&bb Candidate $httll 8Y6xbe voNd **UPOA** nowhave votes oouated for him, at anyeueh gemral, epeo~al; or px-imary61eotionr~ The qualifioatione for the office of 4.M health officer a pear to be preecrfbed by ganerel law, Article 1 o L $03 ar unamww .tana;ua.ge providea that **A0** pereon **0**de sup?a,, in c **tl-48~** 8n of the ofty &all. **be** appointed mWiz~ing, the **6krtUteS** quoted to ulearly expreae the intent of the togi;tslntuxe quaLlfications of individuals &hey than those nilnedin the Con&f-. tutioa to hold, any off&a of honor, truut OPeuoltment provided b the lawa of the State, (tortinber~y va; State; 2S3s. '8. 146,) Tie (ifflce of city health offher ia one of honor, truat andemolument

. R rovided by the lawa Ofthe Ytate &nd80held 

### LAour Opinion to you, o4 O-816 approved June 1, 1939.

In amwer to your question ~y’ouare respectfully advised that to be elfg;ible for 8p lntment do the 

### office of city health officer under the 

### general!lLiI ofthb 

### State a physiclgn must be M elwtor having #aided in such reurlcipaXi~y inore tksn six months. Tow% 

### very truly

BY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

______________________________________________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 14-20250

ALI ABDALLAH,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER TERMINATING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS

REQUESTING RECOMMENDATION TO A HALFWAY HOUSE 

Defendant Ali Abdallah, pleaded guilty to four counts of Hobbs Act robbery and 

brandishing a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence for his role in a series 

of 2014 armed robberies at gas stations in Detroit. (ECF No. 30.) On November 21, 

2014, the court sentenced him to 121 months imprisonment. (ECF No. 35, PageID.163.) 

Pending before the court are Defendant’s “Motion for Judicial Recommendation 

for Full Term Halfway House Recommendation” dated September 14, 2021 (ECF No. 

56), and his motion renewing the request filed on December 27, 2021, (ECF No. 63). In 

the motions, Defendant, who is 28, argues that he should be placed in a residential 

reentry program (“halfway house”) to serve the remainder of his sentence because 

medical conditions make him especially susceptible to COVID-19. (ECF No. 56, 

PageID.329.) A search of the Bureau of Prison’s online database, however, indicates 

that, as of June 2022, Defendant is no longer housed in a Federal prison and has 

already been assigned to a residential reentry facility in Michigan. See Find an Inmate, 

Federal Bureau of Prisons, https://www.bop.gov/mobile/find_inmate/ (last visited June

Case 2:14-cr-20250-RHC-RSW ECF No. 64, PageID.486 Filed 06/21/22 Page 1 of 2
2

17, 2022). Thus, the instant motions requesting transfer to a residential reentry facility 

are moot. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s “Motion for Judicial Recommendation for Full 

Term Halfway House Recommendation” (ECF No. 56) is TERMINATED AS MOOT.

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Renewed Motion (ECF No. 63) is 

TERMINATED AS MOOT.

 s/Robert H. Cleland / 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: June 21, 2022

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record 

on this date, June 21, 2022, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Lisa Wagner / 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(810) 292-6522

S:\Cleland\Cleland\AAB\Opinions and Orders\Criminal\14-20250.ABDALLAH.MotionToReduceSentance.AAB.docx

Case 2:14-cr-20250-RHC-RSW ECF No. 64, PageID.487 Filed 06/21/22 Page 2 of 2
# C_2011319EN.01002801.xml

| 29.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/28

---

Order of the General Court of 6 September 2011 — BFA v Council

(Case T-120/11) (1)

1

2011/C 319/58

Language of the case: French

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 130, 30.4.2011.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I,
William W. Harrod, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                   |  |     |  |                                                                                      
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|DATE: May 13, 2004 |  | BY: |  | /s/ William W. Harrod                                                                
|                   |  |     |  | William W. Harrod President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 09
- 00095
- CV
IN RE LAURA DOBBINS
Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION
After a jury verdict, which did not terminate the parent

- child relationship between Laura Dobbins and her child, Dobbins brought a peti tion for writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to enter a final order returning her child into her

care, control, and possession. Since the date of the filing of the petition for writ of mandamus, the child has been returned to Dobbins by the trial c ourt. We requested a response from the parties regarding the effect of the trial court’s ruling on this proceeding. The Texas Department of Family and Protective Services has filed a motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus asserting that it i s now moot since the trial court has granted all of the relief requested by the Relator. The Relator has filed no
response. When this Court cannot take any action that can e ffect the requested relief, and thus the order will have no practical result, we must dismiss the petition for writ of
mandamus as moot. Dow Chemical Co. v. Garcia , 909 S.W.2d 503, 505 (Tex. 1995) ; In re
Union Pac. R.R ., 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 940 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2004, orig. proceeding).In re Dobbins Page 2

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is granted, an d therefore the petition for writ
of mandamus is dismissed as moot.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Reyna , and Justice Davis Petition Dismissed Opinion delivered and filed on July 22, 2009 CV06
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-10200

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DONALD GENE RHOADES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:00-CR-226-1-Y

--------------------

November 29, 2001

Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Donald Gene Rhoades appeals from his jury conviction for

conspiracy to manufacture over 50 grams of methamphetamine. 

Rhoades argues that there is no evidence of an agreement

between him and any person to manufacture methamphetamine. He also

argues that there was insufficient evidence that he intended to

manufacture more than 50 grams of methamphetamine. We have

reviewed the trial testimony and hold that the jury could have

rationally concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that Rhoades was

aware of Larry Robinson’s intention to manufacture methamphetamine;
No. 01-10200

-2-

that, with this knowledge, he attempted to procure a necessary

ingredient for Robinson to make the drugs; and that the conspiracy

intended to produce more than 50 grams of methamphetamine. United

States v. Gonzales, 79 F.3d 413, 423 (5th Cir. 1996). 

Rhoades also challenges the calculation of his offense level

based his intent to manufacture more than 50 grams of

methamphetamine. The district court’s determination of drug

quantity need be supported by only a preponderance of the evidence.

United States v. Gaytan, 74 F.3d 545, 558 (5th Cir. 1996). As

discussed above, the evidence supports the jury’s finding, based on

the much stricter reasonable doubt standard, that Rhoades intended

to manufacture more than 50 grams of drugs. Accordingly, the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.