alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011355EN.01000902.xml

| 3.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/9

---

Action brought on 22 September 2011 — European Commission v French Republic

(Case C-485/11)

2011/C 355/15

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bordes and G. Braun, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: French Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that by introducing an additional charge on operators of electronic communications by Article 33 of Law No 2009-258 of 5 March 2009 on audiovisual communication, (1) the French Republic failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 12 of Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services. (2) |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that by introducing an additional charge on operators of electronic communications by Article 33 of Law No 2009-258 of 5 March 2009 on audiovisual communication, (1) the French Republic failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 12 of Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services. (2)

1

2

| — | order the French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its action, the Commission questions the compatibility of Article 302 bis KH of the General Tax Code, introduced par Article 33 of Law No 2009-258 of 5 March 2009 on audiovisual communication and the new public television service, with the Authorisations Directive. By imposing a charge on undertakings operating an electronic communications network or providing an electronic communications service under the general authorisation, the defendant infringes in particular Article 12 of the directive. The Commission does not accept the argument of the national authorities that Article 12 relates solely to charges which the States may impose ‘in respect of’ the issue of a licence or a process linked to the procedure of authorising operators of electronic communications. According to the applicant, the objective of Article 12 is in fact to encompass any form of ‘administrative’ charge, in other words linked to all costs engendered by the management, monitoring and enforcement of the authorisation scheme, and not only those linked to the issue of authorisation.

---

(1)  JORF No 0056, p. 4321.

1

(2)  OJ 2002 L 108, p. 21.

2

---
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4686

_____________________________

MARCUS L. MURPHY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

John L. Miller, Judge.

October 23, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, ROBERTS, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Marcus L. Murphy, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### § 169.549 Ring lifebuoys and water lights.

(a)

(1) The minimum number of life buoys and the minimum number to which water lights must be attached must be in accordance with the following table:

| Length of vessel | Minimum number of buoys | Minimum number of buoys with waterlights attached |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Under 100 | 2 | 1 |
| 100 feet to less than 200 ft | 4 | 2 |
| 200 feet to less than 300 ft | 6 | 2 |
| 300 feet to less than 400 ft | 12 | 4 |
| 400 feet to less than 600 ft | 18 | 9 |

Table 169.549(a)(1)

(2) One lifebuoy on each side of a vessel must have an attached line at least 15 fathoms in length.

(b) All lifebuoys must be placed where they are readily accessible. They must be capable of being readily cast loose.

(c)

(1) All ring lifebuoys must be approved under subpart 160.050 or 160.064 of this chapter and be international orange in color.

(2) Each water light must be approved under subpart 161.010 of this chapter.
# C_2008150EN.01000301.xml

| 17.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 150/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 150/3

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 150/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 30.4.2008 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | N 14/08 |
| Member State | United Kingdom |
| Region | Scotland |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Broadband in Scotland — Extending Broadband Reach |
| Legal basis | Section 53 of the Scotland Act 1998 |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Regional development, Sectoral development |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: GBP 3,4 million |
| Intensity | 60 % |
| Duration | 1.4.2008-31.3.2013 |
| Economic sectors | Post and telecommunications |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Scottish Government |
| Meridian Court, 2nd Floor |
| 5 Cadogan Street |
| Glasgow G2 6AT |
| United Kingdom |

Date of adoption of the decision

30.4.2008

Reference number of the aid

N 14/08

Member State

United Kingdom

Region

Scotland

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Broadband in Scotland — Extending Broadband Reach

Legal basis

Section 53 of the Scotland Act 1998

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Regional development, Sectoral development

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: GBP 3,4 million

Intensity

60 %

Duration

1.4.2008-31.3.2013

Economic sectors

Post and telecommunications

Name and address of the granting authority

Scottish Government

Meridian Court, 2nd Floor

5 Cadogan Street

Glasgow G2 6AT

United Kingdom

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

---
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.22 Foreign flag vessel: Certificate of Compliance endorsement application. ( a ) A person who desires an endorsed Certificate of Compliance to meet § 154.1802(a) of this part for a foreign flag vessel, whose flag administration issues IMO Certificates, must submit to the Commanding Officer (MSC), Attn: Marine Safety Center, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7430, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7430, in a written or electronic format, an application that includes the following: ( 1 ) The vessel's valid IMO Certificate.
( 2 ) A description of the vessel.
( 3 ) Specifications for the cargo containment system.
( 4 ) A general arrangement plan of the vessel.
( 5 ) A midship section plan of the vessel.
( 6 ) Schematic plans of the liquid and vapor cargo piping.
( 7 ) A firefighting and safety plan.
( 8 ) If the applicant is requesting an endorsement for the carriage of ethylene oxide, a classification society certification that the vessel meets § 154.1725(a) (4), (5), and (7).
( 9 ) If the vessel is a new gas vessel, or an existing vessel that does not meet § 154.12 (b), (c), or (d)— ( i ) A certification from a classification society that the vessel— ( A ) Has enhanced grades of steel meeting § 154.170 (b)(1) and (b)(2) for crack arresting purposes in the deck stringer, sheer strake, and bilge strake; and
( B ) Meets § 154.701, or if the vessel carries methane, meets § 154.703, by having the capability of cargo tank pressure and temperature control without venting; and
( ii ) The vessel's valid SOLAS Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate and Cargo Ship Safety Equipment Certificate.
( 10 ) Any additional plans, certificates, and information needed by the Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center to determine whether or not the vessel meets this part.
( b ) A person who desires an endorsed Certificate of Compliance to meet § 154.1802(b) for a foreign flag vessel, whose flag administration does not issue IMO Certificates, must submit to the Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center the plans, calculations, and information under § 154.15(b).
[CGD 77-069, 52 FR 31626, Aug. 21, 1987, as amended by CGD 88-070, 53 FR 34535, Sept. 7, 1988; CGD 89-025, 54 FR 19571, May 8, 1989; CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995; 60 FR 54106, Oct. 19, 1995; USCG-2005-23172, 70 FR 75734, Dec. 21, 2005; USCG-2007-29018, 72 FR 53967, Sept. 21, 2007; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60155, Sept. 30, 2013; USCG-2016-0498, 82 FR 35092, July 28, 2017]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINI

Alexandria Division

STOP RECKLESS ECONOMIC

INSTABILITY CAUSED BY

DEMOCRATS, elal.

Plaintiffs,

v.

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

Defendant.

Civil Action No. l:14-cv-00397 (AJT/IDD)

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend and/or Supplement

Complaint [Dkt. No. 36]. This matter has been fully briefed by the parties and can be resolved

without oral argument, as such argument would not aid the decisional process. Accordingly, it is

hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend and/or Supplement Complaint [Dkt. No.

36] is GRANTED.

The Clerk is directed to forward copies ofthis Order to all counsel of record.

ENTERED this 24,h day ofJuly 2014.

Alexandria, Virginia vilm- 7s/.

Ivan D. Davis

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:14-cv-00397-AJT-IDD Document 47 Filed 07/24/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID# 475
# C_2014071EN.01001701.xml

| 8.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2014 — Streng v OHIM — Gismondi (PARAMETRICA)

(Case T-495/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark PARAMETRICA - Earlier national word mark parameta - Relative ground for refusal - Failure to produce evidence in the language of the opposition proceedings - Rule 19(2) and (3) and Rule 98(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)

(2014/C 71/28)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Michael Streng (Erding, Germany) (represented by: A. Pappert, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Fulvio Gismondi (Rome, Italy) (represented by: A. Masetti Zannini de Concina, G. Petrocchi, M. Bucarelli and F. Bellan, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 July 2011 (Case R 1348/2010-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Michael Streng and Mr Fulvio Gismondi.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Michael Streng to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Michael Streng to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 26.11.2011.

---
§ 169.686 Shore power. If a shore power connection is provided it must meet the following requirements: ( a ) A shore power connection box or receptacle and a cable connecting this box or receptacle to the main distribution panel must be permanently installed in an accessible location.
( b ) The shore power cable must be provided with a disconnect means located on or near the main distribution panel.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                  5
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
<CURRENCY>                                 U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,090
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,110
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,150
<INVENTORY>                                     38,246
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,835
<PP&E>                                          53,998
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 293,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,743
<BONDS>                                         92,050
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                     144,445
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   293,770
<SALES>                                        219,581
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               219,581
<CGS>                                          105,856
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,856
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,291
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,688
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,678
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,010
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,010
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.19
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       6
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER> 1
   <NAME> BELCREST CAPITAL FUND LLC


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                    2,147,679,630
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                   2,249,319,916
<RECEIVABLES>                            21,731,699
<ASSETS-OTHER>                           162,559
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,271,214,174
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                 0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                  535,000,000
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                8,432,696
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                      543,432,696
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                          0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                 0
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                    14,995,354
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                    5,148,858
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                   0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                  0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                 0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                 117,651,909
<NET-ASSETS>                             1,727,781,478
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                        20,801,786
<INTEREST-INCOME>                        1,459,567
<OTHER-INCOME>                           0
<EXPENSES-NET>                           18,427,991
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                  3,833,362
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                 3,497,013
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                87,239,579
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                    94,569,960
<EQUALIZATION>                           0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                    0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                  9,946,573
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>              100,077
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                      0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                   1,183,578,643
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                  0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                    1,974,308
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       11,815,778
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                          18,427,991
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                     1,190,634,033
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                    105.69
<PER-SHARE-NII>                          0.39
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                  9.14
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                     0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                     0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                      115.22
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                          3.12


</TABLE>
!"#!$%%&'(&)

 *+" ,,   

    $     




		
 

    -.,."/+" $    

   


	
	
	
	
	
0	






	
0	



	

 *+" ,, 1."2,!3).24!"25 6+"/7 82"9+28": !";<)79=8.3.56

3.24. ,>6"! ,.2 82!>3 !, 8.?./.3+7. !"!@@22!"A2,+>3. !!44!2.)79A2

B! !" !!@4.7?#!$C; 8.<B! !"=$)79,./ 8.B! !"!"D>".E%F%%$G" 8.

2+@./+6)792.3./ 8.B! !"!" 8.?756,32 +22@+$*>32>+"  !H!+)>.

I;5!, 8.J" ./K + .2-2 3 !>3 ,!3 8.-2 3 !,!>@5+ 8.?7A2!44!2 !"L+2

/>.!"D>".%%%F%%$7."+22>@": 8.?7L+2."  ./ ! 83..+// !"+/+62 !3.24!"/

>"/.3)>.C;/!, 8.?./.3+)>.2!,*3!./>3./>. ! 8."../,!3@+2.3.5.+>2.

!, 8.?7A2/.,+> +"63.24!"2.56 8.?7L+2/>."!+ .3 8+"D>".%I%F%%5.+>2.!,

 8." .3."":L..M."/$2 8.?7A2@.@!3+"/>@"!44!2 !"L+2<"! ,./L 8" 8.

43.235./ @. 8.!>3 @+6 3.+  8.NBO! !"+2!"././$=-$-$$H)I;5$

 -+ ./PD>6%F%F%%

).24. ,>62>5@ ./

QRQSTUVWTXYZ[V\]^^^^^

K >+3 $B*8+

;-$$_+3#!$`F'%(%a

bcdefghhijkilllmnibobpqjrsetuvwxyezlv{hl{hh|c}efq~m




	
			

	

 !""

	#"""$

%&'"($")*++,+

-&'"(+))*+""

	./	
	



012345667897:::;<70=0>?8@A3BCDEFG3H:DI6:I66J1K36?L;
	
		

	


							
	 	!			 			"	# 		

  	$ 	%	&##	"	'()(*()(	$	&	+		,-	

	

$ 	%	&##	

./	$	)	0(%(	

12	3&	456	

	

787	9:;<=:	>?	@ABC<DE		

)	&(	+*	

	

FGHI	JKLLMNOMPPPQRMFSF			TUNVWIXY	Z			[\]I^	PZ_LP_LL			`GaI	Q	Ub	Q
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-21269 and 333-26973) pertaining to the:

     White Pine Software, Inc. Stock Option Plan (1992),

     White Pine Software, Inc. Stock Option Plan (1993),

     White Pine Software, Inc. Stock Option Plan (1994),

     White Pine Software, Inc. Stock Option Plan (1995),

     Letter Agreement between White Pine Software, Inc. and Richard Kennerly
     delivered as of April 16, 1996,

     White Pine Software, Inc. 1996 Incentive and Nonqualified Stock Option
     Plan,

     White Pine Software, Inc. 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

of our report dated February 1, 2000, except for Note 10, as to which the
date is February 29, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of White Pine Software, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form
10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Manchester, New Hampshire
March 24, 2000
§ 188.15-1 Conditions under which equivalents may be used. ( a ) Where in this subchapter it is provided that a particular fitting, material, appliance, apparatus, or equipment, or type thereof, shall be fitted or carried in a vessel, or that any particular provision shall be made or arrangement shall be adopted, the Commandant may accept in substitution therefor any other fitting, material, apparatus, or equipment, or type thereof, or any other arrangement: *Provided,* That he shall have been satisfied by suitable trials that the fitting, material, appliance, apparatus, or equipment, or type thereof, or the provision or arrangement is at least as effective as that specified in this subchapter.
( b ) In any case where it is shown to the satisfaction of the Commandant that the use of any particular equipment, apparatus, or arrangement not specifically required by law is unreasonable or impracticable, the Commandant may permit the use of alternate equipment, apparatus, or arrangement to such an extent and upon such conditions as will insure, to his satisfaction, a degree of safety consistent with the minimum standards set forth in this subchapter.
# C_2013171EN.01002701.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 April 2013 — Boehringer Ingelheim International v OHIM (RELY-ABLE)

(Case T-640/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - International registration designating the European Community - Word mark RELY-ABLE - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Ground included for sake of completeness)

2013/C 171/52

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH (Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, A. Renck and C. Steudtner, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 September 2011 (Case R 756/2011-4) concerning the international registration designating the European Community of the word sign RELY-ABLE.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 58, 25.2.2012.

1

---