alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.10

                                  790 COLORADO
                        FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE ("First Amendment") is entered as of
the 14th day of April, 1997, by and between BPG PASADENA, L.L.C.
("Landlord"), a Delaware Limited Liability Company, and CITYSEARCH, INC.
("Tenant"), a Delaware corporation.

THE PARTIES ENTER THIS FIRST AMENDMENT on the basis of the following facts,
understandings and intentions:

A.    Landlord and Tenant entered a 790 Colorado Office Lease ("Lease"), dated
      as of September 30, 1996, pursuant to which Tenant leased from Landlord a
      portion of the premises ("Premises") located at 790 East Colorado Blvd.,
      Pasadena, California. All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have
      the meanings ascribed to them in the Lease.

B.    Landlord and Tenant desire to amend the Lease to extend the Lease
      Expiration Date and the termination right by four (4) months.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereto agree as follows:

1.    TERM EXPIRATION DATE. The term expiration date is March 31, 2002.

2.    TERMINATION CLAUSE. Lessee may terminate the Lease after 40 months,
      subject to: (a) no material default of Lease; (b) nine (9) months prior
      written notice; (c) payment of five (5) months Base Rental; and (d)
      payment of all unamortized Lessee improvement provided by Lessor and
      unamortized Lease commissions paid by Lessor at 12% interest rate. The
      Lease Commencement Date was November 15, 1996 making the first effective
      date that the Lease can be terminated as March 16, 2000.

3.    FULL FORCE AND EFFECT. Except as amended hereby, the terms, covenants
      and conditions contained in the Lease shall remain in full force and
      effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment as
of the date first above written.

                                        "Lessor"
                                        BPG PASADENA, L.L.C.,
                                        a Delaware Limited Liability Company


                                        By: /s/ Michael D. Barber
                                           ----------------------------------
                                              Its: Managing Member


                                        "Lessee"
                                        CITYSEARCH, INC.
                                        a Delaware Corporation


                                        By:  /s/ Bradley Ramberg
                                           ----------------------------------

                                            Its: CFO  5/6/97
                                               ------------------------------
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
for the period covered by this Report.
 Dated:  August 16, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Eloise L. MackusEloise L. Mackus, Esq.Interim Chief Executive OfficerDated: August 16, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Therese Ann LiutkusTherese Ann Liutkus, CPAPresident, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2016222EN.01001901.xml

| 20.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/19

---

Order of the General Court of 19 April 2016 — ETAD v Commission

(Case T-419/11) (1)

((State aid - Annulment of the contested measure - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 222/22)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Etaireia Akiniton Dimosiou AE (ETAD), formerly Ellinika Touristika Akinita AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Frangakis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, H. van Vliet and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Elliniko Kazino Kerkyras AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Frangakis, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou AE OTA — Loutraki AE — Klab Otel Loutraki Kazino Touristikes kai Xenodocheiakes Epicheiriseis AE (Loutraki, Greece) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission Decision 2011/716/EU of 24 May 2011 on State aid to certain Greek casinos C 16/10 (ex NN 22/10, ex CP 318/09) implemented by the Hellenic Republic (OJ L 285, p. 25).

Operative part of the order

The Court hereby orders:

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | The European Commission shall pay its own costs and pay those incurred by Etaireia Akiniton Dimosiou AE (ETAD) and Elliniko Kazino Kerkyras. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission shall pay its own costs and pay those incurred by Etaireia Akiniton Dimosiou AE (ETAD) and Elliniko Kazino Kerkyras.

| 3. | Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou AE OTA — Loutraki AE — Klab Otel Loutraki Kazino Touristikes kai Xenodocheiakes Epicheiriseis AE shall pay their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou AE OTA — Loutraki AE — Klab Otel Loutraki Kazino Touristikes kai Xenodocheiakes Epicheiriseis AE shall pay their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.

---
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2266 

To delay for 1 year the date for compliance with certain regulations prescribed 

by the Secretary of the Treasury and the Board of Governors of the 

Federal Reserve System under subchapter IV of chapter 53 of title 

31, United States Code. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2009 

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To delay for 1 year the date for compliance with certain 

regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury 

and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 

System under subchapter IV of chapter 53 of title 31, 

United States Code. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reasonable Prudence 

5 in Regulation Act’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2266 IH

1 SEC. 2. DELAY IN APPLICATION OF REGULATION. 

2 Notwithstanding any provision of part 233 of title 12, 

3 Code of Federal Regulations (also known as Regulation 

4 GG) or of part 132 of title 31, Code of Federal Regula5 tions, jointly prescribed by the Board of Governors of the 

6 Federal Reserve System and the Secretary of the Treas7 ury, respectively (to implement subchapter IV of chapter 

8 53 of title 31, United States Code), the date by which 

9 compliance with such regulations is required shall be ex10 tended from December 1, 2009, to December 1, 2010. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report of Loral Space &Communications Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for theperiod ending December 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Michael B. Targoff, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.     /s/ MICHAEL B. TARGOFF       *Michael B. Targoff* *Chief Executive Officer*March 28, 2006
# C_2008232EN.01003601.xml

| 10.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/36

---

Communication from the Minister for Economic Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands on the basis of Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

(2008/C 232/12)

The Minister for Economic Affairs hereby gives notice that an application has been received for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block E12 as indicated on the map appended as Annex 3 to the Mining Regulation (Mijnbouwregeling) (Government Gazette (Staatscourant) 2002, No 245).

Mijnbouwregeling

Staatscourant

With reference to the Directive mentioned in the introduction and Article 15 of the Mining Act (Mijnbouwwet) (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees (Staatsblad) 2002, No 542), the Minister for Economic Affairs hereby invites interested parties to submit a competing application for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block E12 of the Dutch continental shelf.

Mijnbouwwet

Staatsblad

The Minister for Economic Affairs is the competent authority for the granting of authorisations. The criteria, conditions and requirements referred to in Articles 5(1), 5(2) and 6(2) of the abovementioned Directive are set out in the Mining Act (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees 2002, No 542).

Applications may be submitted during the 13 weeks following the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union and should be sent to:

Official Journal of the European Union

| The Minister for Economic Affairs |
| --- |
| For the attention of J.C. De Groot, Director for the Energy Market |
| ALP/562 |
| Bezuidenhoutseweg 30 |
| Postbus 20101 |
| 2500 EC Den Haag |
| Nederland |

The Minister for Economic Affairs

For the attention of J.C. De Groot, Director for the Energy Market

ALP/562

Bezuidenhoutseweg 30

Postbus 20101

2500 EC Den Haag

Nederland

Applications received after the expiry of this period will not be considered.

A decision on the applications will be taken not later than 12 months after this period has expired.

Further information can be obtained from the following telephone number: (31-70) 379 77 62 (contact person: E.J. Hoppel).

---
§ 170.105 Applicability. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this subpart applies to each vessel.
( b ) This subpart does not apply to any of the following vessels unless the stability of the vessel is questioned by the OCMI: ( 1 ) A deck cargo barge that complies with the requirements in § 174.020 of this chapter.
( 2 ) A tank vessel that only carries a product listed in § 30.25-1 of this chapter and that is less than 150 gross tons.
( 3 ) A tank barge that— ( i ) Operates only in rivers or lakes, bays, and sounds service;
( ii ) Does not have to meet 33 CFR part 157, subpart B; and
( iii ) Only carries a product listed in § 30.25-1 of this chapter.
( 4 ) A sailing school vessel that is an open boat that complies with the requirements in § 173.063(e) of this subchapter.
( 5 ) A small passenger vessel inspected under subchapter T of this chapter if § 178.210(c) of this chapter is applicable.
[CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51010, Nov. 4, 1983, as amended by CGD 83-005, 51 FR 923, Jan. 9, 1986; CGD 85-080, 61 FR 944, Jan. 10, 1996; USCG-2007-0030, 75 FR 78084, Dec. 14, 2010]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

Ford Motor Company, 

 Plaintiff/ 

 Counter-Defendant, 

v. 

Versata Software, Inc., f/k/a Trilogy 

Software, Inc., Versata Development 

Group, Inc. and Trilogy, Inc., 

 Defendants/ 

 Counter-Plaintiffs. 

Case No. 15-10628-MFL-EAS 

(consolidated with Case No. 15-cv-11624) 

Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING THE REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPECIAL MASTER (DKT. 725) 

Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion requesting leave to amend the 

briefing schedule relating to the Special Master’s R&R. Having considered the 

matter, the Court GRANTS the Motion. Ford’s 10-page Objection to the R&R 

(attached as Ex. A to the motion for leave) is due March 4, 2020. Versata’s 10-page 

Response to Ford’s Objection and Motion to Adopt the R&R shall be due March 19, 

2020 and Ford’s reply shall be due March 26, 2020. 

/s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: March 5, 2020 
2 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on March 5, 2020, by electronic means and/or ordinary 

mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (810) 341-9764
§ 185.502 Crew and passenger list. ( a ) The owner, charterer, managing operator, or master of the following vessels must keep a correct list of the names of all persons that embark on and disembark from the vessel: ( 1 ) A vessel making a coastwise or oceans voyage where: ( i ) Passengers embark or disembark from the vessel to another vessel or port other than at the port of origin; or
( ii ) Passengers are carried overnight;
( 2 ) A vessel making a voyage of more than 300 miles on the Great Lakes, except from a Canadian to a United States port; and
( 3 ) A vessel arriving from a foreign port, except at a United States Great Lakes port from a Canadian Great Lakes port.
( b ) The master of a vessel required to prepare a crew and passenger list by paragraph (a) of this section shall see that the list is prepared prior to departing on a voyage. The list must be communicated verbally or in writing ashore at the vessel's normal berthing location or with a representative of the owner or managing operator of the vessel. The crew and passenger list shall be available to the Coast Guard upon request.
§ 172.105 Extent of damage. For the purpose of § 172.103, design calculations must include both side and bottom damage, applied separately. Damage must consist of the most disabling penetration up to and including penetrations having the following dimensions: ( a ) Side damage must be assumed to be as follows: ( 1 ) Longitudinal extent—6 feet (183 centimeters).
( 2 ) Transverse extent—30 inches (76 centimeters).
( 3 ) Vertical extent—from the baseline upward without limit.
( b ) Bottom damage must be assumed to be 15 inches (38 centimeters) from the baseline upward.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.076-1 Scope. ( a ) This subpart contains structural and performance standards for approval of inflatable recreational personal flotation devices (PFDs), as well as requirements for production follow-up inspections, associated manuals, information pamphlets, and markings.
( b ) Inflatable PFDs approved under this subpart rely entirely upon inflation for buoyancy.
[CGD 94-110, 60 FR 32848, June 23, 1995, as amended by USCG-2011-0076, 77 FR 19942, Apr. 3, 2012]
# C_2011311EN.01004501.xml

| 22.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/45

---

Action brought on 30 August 2011 — Longevity Health Products v OHIM — Weleda Trademark (MENOCHRON)

(Case T-473/11)

2011/C 311/84

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Longevity Health Products, Inc. (Nassau, Bahamas) (represented by: J. Korab, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Weleda Trademark AG (Arlesheim, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Weleda Trademark AG (Arlesheim, Switzerland)

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare the action by the company Longevity Health Products Inc. admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the action by the company Longevity Health Products Inc. admissible;

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 July 2011 in Case R 2345/2010-4 and reject the opposition by Weleda Trademark AG to the trade mark registration CTM 005050752; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 July 2011 in Case R 2345/2010-4 and reject the opposition by Weleda Trademark AG to the trade mark registration CTM 005050752; and

| — | order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to bear the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Longevity Health Products, Inc.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘MENOCHRON’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 5 and 35.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Weleda Trademark AG

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Word mark ‘MENODORON’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 5 and 44.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: The opposition was upheld.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeal was dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8 of Regulation No 207/2009, (1) because there is no likelihood that the marks at issue would be confused.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
# C_2011282EN.01000801.xml

| 24.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/8

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven (Netherlands) lodged on 6 July 2011 — G. Brouwer v Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken, Landbouw en Innovatie

(Case C-355/11)

2011/C 282/14

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: G. Brouwer

Appellant:

Respondent: Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken, Landbouw en Innovatie

Respondent:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Directive 91/629/EEC (1) be interpreted as meaning that the management requirements within the meaning of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (2) arising out of that directive are also applicable to calves which are kept confined by a farmer in the context of a dairy farming operation? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Directive 91/629/EEC (1) be interpreted as meaning that the management requirements within the meaning of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (2) arising out of that directive are also applicable to calves which are kept confined by a farmer in the context of a dairy farming operation?

1

2

| 2. | If that question is answered in the negative, does the fact that a Member State has implemented that directive by means of legislation which declares the aforementioned requirements to be nevertheless applicable to such calves, give grounds, in the event of an infringement of those requirements in that Member State, for deeming a reduction or exclusion under Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 to be necessary? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If that question is answered in the negative, does the fact that a Member State has implemented that directive by means of legislation which declares the aforementioned requirements to be nevertheless applicable to such calves, give grounds, in the event of an infringement of those requirements in that Member State, for deeming a reduction or exclusion under Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 to be necessary?

---

(1)  Council Directive of 19 November 1991 laying down minimum standards for the protection of calves (OJ 1991 L 340, p. 28).

1

(2)  Council Regulation of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulations (EEC) No 2019/93, (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001, (EC) No 1454/2001, (EC) 1868/94, (EC) No 1251/1999, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1673/2000, (EEC) No 2358/71 and (EC) No 2529/2001 (OJ 2003 L 270, p. 1).

2

---
#### Henry A. Dillaye, *Appellant, v.*Simeon Rouse and others, *Respondents*.

New trial denied and judgment ordered for the defendants on the verdict.
<Page>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

    WHEREAS, Lucent Technologies Inc., a Delaware corporation (hereinafter
referred to as the 'Company'), proposes to file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2001; and

    WHEREAS, the undersigned is a Director and/or Officer of the Company, as
indicated below his or her signature:

    NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints John A.
Kritzmacher, as attorney for and in the name, place and stead of the
undersigned, and in the capacity of the undersigned as a Director and/or Officer
of the Company, as indicated, to execute and file such Form 10-K and any
amendments or supplements thereto, hereby giving and granting to said attorney,
full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
whatsoever requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as
fully, to all intents and purposes, as the undersigned might or could do if
personally present at the doing thereof, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said attorney may or shall lawfully do, or cause to be done, by virtue
hereof.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney this
19th day of December, 2001.

<Table>
<S>                                            <C>
By: /s/ HENRY B. SCHACHT                       By: /s/ FRANK A. D'AMELIO
    .........................................  .............................................
   Name:  Henry B. Schacht                        Name:  Frank A. D'Amelio
   Title: Chairman of the Board and               Title: Executive Vice President
          Chief Executive Officer                        Chief Financial Officer

By: /s/ PAUL A. ALLAIRE                        By: /s/ BETSY S. ATKINS
    .........................................  .............................................
   Name:  Paul A. Allaire                         Name:  Betsy S. Atkins
   Title: Director                                Title: Director

By: /s/ CARLA A. HILLS                         By: /s/ FRANKLIN A. THOMAS
    .........................................  .............................................
   Name:  Carla A. Hills                          Name:  Franklin A. Thomas
   Title: Director                                Title: Director

By: /s/ JOHN A. YOUNG
    .........................................
   Name:  John A. Young
   Title: Director
</Table>

                                      120