alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 173.095 Towline pull criterion. ( a ) In each towing condition, each vessel must be shown by design calculations to meet the requirements of either paragraph (b) or (c) of this section.
( b ) The vessel's metacentric height (GM) must be equal to or greater than the following: where— N = number of propellers. P = shaft power per shaft in horsepower (kilowatts). D = propeller diameter in feet (meters). s = that fraction of the propeller circle cylinder which would be intercepted by the rudder if turned to 45 degrees from the vessel's centerline. h = vertical distance from propeller shaft centerline at rudder to towing bitts in feet (meters). Δ = displacement in long tons (metric tons). f = minimum freeboard along the length of the vessel in feet (meters). B = molded beam in feet (meters). K = 38 in English units. K = 13.93 in metric units.
( c ) When a heeling arm curve, calculated in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section, is plotted against the vessel's righting arm curve— ( 1 ) Equilibrium must be reached before the downflooding angle; and
( 2 ) The residual righting energy must be at least 2 foot-degrees (.61 meter-degrees) up to the smallest of the following angles: ( i ) The angle of maximum righting arm.
( ii ) The downflooding angle.
( iii ) 40 degrees.
( d ) The heeling arm curve specified in paragraph (c) of this section must be calculated by the following equation: where— HA = heeling arm. θ = angle of heel. N, P, D, K, s, h, and Δ are as defined in paragraph (b) of this section.
( e ) For the purpose of this section, downflooding angle means the static angle from the intersection of the vessel's centerline and waterline in calm water to the first opening that does not close watertight automatically.
( f ) For the purpose of this section, at each angle of heel, a vessel's righting arm may be calculated considering either— ( 1 ) The vessel is permitted to trim free until the trimming moment is zero; or
( 2 ) The vessel does not trim as it heels.
[CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51045, Nov. 4, 1983, as amended at 88 FR 10032, Feb. 16, 2023 ]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MICHAEL A. WILLIS,

Petitioner, Civil Action No. 02-CV-72436

vs. HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

MARY BURGHUIS,

Respondent.

____________________/

ORDER TRANSFERRING PETITIONER’S

“COMPLAINT FOR EQUITABLE RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT”

TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

Petitioner has filed a document in this matter entitled “Complaint for Equitable Relief

from Judgment in the Exercise of this Court’s Inherent Article III Powers and/or Motion for Relief

from Judgment” [docket entry 116]. Petitioner asks, among other things, that the Court “re-open

the inquiry into the Petition For A Writ Of Habeas Corpus,” allow him to amend his petition and to

conduct discovery, and hold an evidentiary hearing. Id. at 14.

The Court denied the petition in this matter in 2011 [docket entries 101, 102]. In

2012, the court of appeals denied petitioner’s application for a certificate of appealability [docket

entry 109]. In 2014, the court of appeals denied petitioner’s motion for leave to file a second or

successive petition [docket entry 112]. Since then, petitioner has filed various motions (e.g., to

amend, for discovery, for sanctions, for an evidentiary hearing), all of which this Court has denied. 

The instant “complaint for equitable relief” appears to be an unauthorized second or

successive habeas petition. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that petitioner’s “complaint for equitable relief” [docket entry 116]

2:02-cv-72436-BAF-PJK Doc # 135 Filed 09/02/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 4442
is hereby transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1631. See In re Sims, 111 F.3d 45, 47 (6th Cir. 1997).

S/ Bernard A. Friedman________

BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: September 2, 2016

Detroit, Michigan

2

2:02-cv-72436-BAF-PJK Doc # 135 Filed 09/02/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 4443
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 70 (Thursday, April 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 18479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1839]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Notice of Sunshine Act Meeting

Date and Time: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 at 10 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: This meeting will be closed to the public.

Items to be Discussed:
    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.


Date and Time: Thursday, April 19, 2007 at 10 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (ninth floor).

Status: This meeting will be open to the public.

Items to be Discussed:
    Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Advisory Opinion 2007-04: Atlatl, Inc. by Duke Williams, Chief 
Executive Officer.
    Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Hybrid Ads.
    Final Report for Gephardt for President, Inc.
    Management and Administrative Matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-1839 Filed 4-10-07; 3:10 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
#### § 169.650 General.

All vessels must be provided with a satisfactory arrangement for draining any compartment, other than small buoyancy compartments, under all practical conditions. Sluice valves are not permitted in watertight bulkheads except as specified in § 169.652(a).
# C_2013189EN.01001903.xml

| 29.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of of 17 May 2013 — Bulgaria v Commission

(Case T-335/11) (1)

1

(EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Single area payment - ‘Disadvantaged areas’ - Complementary national direct payments - Operation of the geographic information system and of the identification system for agricultural parcels - Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 - Proportionality - Legal certainty - obligation to state reasons)

2013/C 189/38

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Bulgaria (represented by: E. Petranova and T. Ivanov, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi, D. Dimov, G. Koleva and D. Stefanov, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision 2011/244/EU of 15 April 2001, on excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2011 L 102, p. 33), as regards the Republic of Bulgaria

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Bulgaria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Bulgaria to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 331, 12.11.2011.

1

---
PUBLIC LAW 111–208—JULY 27, 2010 124 STAT. 2253 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4840: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Mar. 19, 21, considered and passed House. 

May 25, considered and passed Senate, amended. 

July 14, House concurred in Senate amendments. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–208 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1981 Cleveland 

Avenue in Columbus, Ohio, as the ‘‘Clarence D. Lumpkin Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CLARENCE D. LUMPKIN POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 1981 Cleveland Avenue in Columbus, Ohio, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Clarence D. Lumpkin Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Clarence D. Lumpkin Post Office’’. 

Approved July 27, 2010. 

July 27, 2010 

[H.R. 4840] 


kgrant on DSKHRRP4G1PROD with PUBLAW
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.060-6 Construction—nonstandard vests. ( a ) *General.* The construction methods used for a nonstandard buoyant vest must be equivalent to the requirements in § 160.060-5 for standard vests and also meet the requirements specified in this section.
( b ) *Sizes.* Each nonstandard vest must contain the following volume of unicellular polyethylene foam buoyant material, determined by the displacement method: ( 1 ) Five hundred cubic inches or more for the adult size, for persons weighing over 90 pounds.
( 2 ) Three hundred and fifty cubic inches or more for a child medium size, for children weighing from 50 to 90 pounds.
( 3 ) Two hundred and twenty-five cubic inches or more for children weighing less than 50 pounds.
( c ) *Arrangement of buoyant material.* The buoyant material in a nonstandard vest must: ( 1 ) Be arranged to hold the wearer in an upright or backward position with head and face out of water;
( 2 ) Have no tendency to turn the wearer face downward in the water; and
( 3 ) Be arranged so that 70 to 75 percent of the total is located in the front of the vest.
( d ) *Neck opening.* Each cloth covered nonstandard vest must have at the neck opening: ( 1 ) A gusset; or
( 2 ) Reinforcing tape.
( e ) *Adjustment, fit, and donning.* Each nonstandard vest must be made with adjustments to: ( 1 ) Fit a range of wearers for the type designed; and
( 2 ) Facilitate donning time for an uninitiated person.
[CGD 72-163R, 38 FR 8122, Mar. 28, 1973]
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

Editorial Note on Subpart 151.50 of Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart 151.50 of part 151 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, and CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996.

§ 151.50-41 Carbon disulfide (carbon bisulfide). ( a ) All openings shall be in the top of the tank.
( b ) Loading lines shall terminate near the bottom of the tank.
( c ) A standard ullage opening shall be provided for secondary and emergency sounding.
( d ) If a cargo discharge pump is used, it shall be inserted through a cylindrical well extending from the tank top to a point near the tank bottom. A blanket of water shall be formed in this well before attempting pump removal.
( e ) Water or inert gas displacement may be used for discharging cargo provided the cargo system is designed for the expected pressure and temperature. This method for discharging may be used with pressure type tanks only.
( f ) Adequate natural ventilation shall be provided for the voids around the cargo tanks while the vessel is under way. During loading and unloading, forced ventilation shall be used. The forced ventilation shall be of sufficient capacity to provide a complete change of air within each void space every 5 minutes. The ventilating fan shall be of nonsparking construction.
( g ) Because of its low ignition temperature and the close clearances required to arrest its flame propagation, carbon disulfide (*carbon bisulfide*) requires safeguards beyond those required for any electrical hazard groups.
( h ) The requirements of § 151.50-40 are also applicable to the shipment of carbon disulfide (*carbon bisulfide*).
[CGFR 70-10, 35 FR 3714, Feb. 25, 1970, as amended by CGD 88-100, 54 FR 40040, Sept. 29, 1989]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case Number: 14-cr-20789 

 v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

D-1 ZACHARY RICHARD WILKS, 

a/k/a ZACHARY RICHARD CHAMBERLAIN, 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING 

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA 

AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT 

On March 18, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris conducted a plea 

hearing pursuant to Defendant’s consent. The Magistrate Judge issued her report on March 19, 

2015, recommending that this Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty. 

Although the Magistrate Judge’s report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may 

object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, 

neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the 

Magistrate Judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and 

recommendation waives any further right to appeal. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, 

ECF No. 29, is ADOPTED. 

 It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s plea of guilty is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 

Plea Agreement, ECF No. 28, is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT. 

Dated: April 7, 2015 s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

1:14-cr-20789-TLL-PTM Doc # 33 Filed 04/07/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 146
PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on April 7, 2015. 

 s/Karri Sandusky 

 Karri Sandusky, Acting Case Manager 

1:14-cr-20789-TLL-PTM Doc # 33 Filed 04/07/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 147
§ 122.524 Fire fighting drills and training. ( a ) The master shall conduct sufficient fire drills to make sure that each crew member is familiar with his or her duties in case of a fire.
( b ) A fire drill must be conducted at least once each month.
( c ) Each fire drill must include: ( 1 ) Summoning passengers on a vessel on an overnight voyage to areas of refuge or embarkation stations;
( 2 ) Summoning the crew to report to assigned stations and to prepare for and demonstrate assigned duties; and
( 3 ) Instructions in the use and location of fire alarms, extinguishers, and any other fire fighting equipment on board.
( d ) Each fire drill must, as far as practicable, be conducted as if there were an actual emergency.
( e ) Fire fighting drills and training shall be logged or otherwise documented for review by the Coast Guard upon request. The drill entry shall include the following information: ( 1 ) Date of the drill and training; and
( 2 ) General description of the drill scenario and training topics.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 935, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51353, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58284, Sept. 29, 2014]
# C_2013123EN.01002801.xml

| 27.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/28

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 13 March 2013 — Mendes v Commission

(Case F-125/11) (1)

1

(Civil service - Open competition - Non-admission to the assessment tests - Administration’s duty to interpret complaints in a spirit of openness - Amendment to the vacancy notice after holding the admission tests - Principle of legitimate expectations - Legal certainty)

2013/C 123/49

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Isabel Mendes (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rogrigues and A. Blot, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul the decision not to admit the applicant to the assessment tests in competition EPSO/AST/111/10

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | annuls the decision of the selection board of open competition EPSO/AST/111/10 of 7 April 2011 not to admit the applicant to the assessment tests; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annuls the decision of the selection board of open competition EPSO/AST/111/10 of 7 April 2011 not to admit the applicant to the assessment tests;

| 2. | orders the European Commission to pay EUR 2 000 to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the European Commission to pay EUR 2 000 to the applicant;

| 3. | dismisses the application as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

3.

dismisses the application as to the remainder;

| 4. | orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 3.3.2012, p. 21.

1

---
Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Michael L. Krall, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Pure Bioscience.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and
have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
     including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
     within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
     is being prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
     controls and procedures; and presented in this report our conclusions about
     the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
     of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
     internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
     business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
     fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
     affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
     issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and


5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
     internal control over financial reporting.


Date: October 29, 2004


/s/ Michael L. Krall
--------------------
Michael L. Krall
President and Chief Executive Officer



<PAGE>
#### § 169.329 Storm rails.

Suitable storm rails or hand grabs must be installed where necessary in all passageways, at deckhouse sides, and at ladders and hatches where persons might have normal access.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

DARLA HUNT,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO: 14-CV-13774-DT

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant.

 /

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order Adopting the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denying

plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment entered this date,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be, and hereby is

GRANTED in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Dated: March 9, 2016 S/Lisa Wagner 

LISA G. WAGNER, CASE MANAGER AND

DEPUTY CLERK TO THE HONORABLE

ROBERT H. CLELEND 

2:14-cv-13774-RHC-APP Doc # 20 Filed 03/09/16 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 516
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Wallace R. Barr, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:



|Dated the 7th day of May 2004                                                                        |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                                                                     |  | 
|/s/WALLACE R. BARRWallace R. Barr
President and Chief Executive Officer,
Caesars Entertainment, Inc. |  | 

---



QuickLinks