alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 75 (Thursday, April 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1934]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 75 / Thursday, April 19, 2007 / 
Notices

[[Page 19679]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


California Coast Provincial Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The California Coast Provincial Advisory Committee (CCPAC) 
will meet for one day on April 25, 2007 in Ukiah, California. The 
purpose of the meeting is to discuss issues relating to implementing 
the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP).

DATES: The meeting will be held from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. on April 25, 
2007.

ADDRESSES: Bureau of Land Management Field Office, 2550 North State 
Street, Ukiah, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Allen, Committee Coordinator, 
USDA, Six Rivers National Forest, 1330 Bayshore Way, Eureka, CA 95501 
(707) 441-3557 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2f44424e43434a416f495c01494a4b015a5c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="660d0b070a0a030826001548000302481315">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda topics to be covered include: (1) 
Forest Service Planning Rules; (2) Survey and Manage Update; (3) 
National Park Service Centennial Initiative; (4) Monitoring Program 
Update; (5) Lacks Creek Project; (6) Regional Interagency Ecosystem 
Committee (RIEC) Decisions; (7) Aquatic Conservation Strategy; and (7) 
NWFP Update.
    The meeting is open to the public. Public input opportunity will be 
provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the 
Committee at that time.

    Dated: April 13, 2007.
William Metz,
Deputy Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 07-1934 Filed 4-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 169.567 Portable fire extinguishers.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at [89 FR 76706](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/89-FR-76706), Sept. 18, 2024.

(a) The minimum number of portable fire extinguishers required on each vessel is determined by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, in accordance with Table [169.567(a)](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-169.567#p-169.567(a)) of this section and other provisions of this subpart.

Table [169.567](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-169.567)(a)—Required Portable Fire Extinguishers

| Space | Portable fire extinguishers | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Minimum required rating | Quantity and location |
| Propulsion machinery space without fixed extinguishing system | 40-B:C | 2. |
| Propulsion machinery space with fixed extinguishing system | 40-B:C | 1 in the vicinity of the exit. |
| Living space and open boats | 2-A | 1 per 1,000 cubic foot of space. |
| Galley (without fixed system) | 40-B:C | 1 per 500 cubic foot. |
| Spare Units | 2-A | 10 percent of the required number rounded up. |
| | 40-B:C | 1. |

(b) Table [169.567(a)](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-169.567#p-169.567(a)) of this section indicates the minimum required classification for each space listed. Extinguishers with larger numerical ratings or multiple letter designations may be used if the extinguishers meet the requirements of the table.

(c) All portable fire extinguishers installed on vessels must be of an approved type.

(d) Portable fire extinguishers must be stowed in a location convenient to the space protected.

(e) Portable fire extinguishers must be installed and located to the satisfaction of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.

(f) Portable fire extinguishers which are required to be protected from freezing must not be located where freezing temperatures may be expected.

[CGD 83-005, [51 FR 897](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/51-FR-897), Jan. 9, 1986; [51 FR 3785](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/51-FR-3785), Jan. 30, 1986, as amended by USCG-2014-0688, [79 FR 58287](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/79-FR-58287), Sept. 29, 2014; USCG-2012-0196, [81 FR 48295](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/81-FR-48295), July 22, 2016]
### Drone/UAS Practice Group

# ANTONELLI 

# LAW

U.S . Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 35 E Wacker Drive Suite 1875 Chicago, IL 6060 1 Tel. 312.201.8310 Jeffrey( cvAntoncl l i-Law.cOin June 26,2015

Re: Amendment to Leading Edge Technologies Exemption No. 11797 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0261 Dear Sir or Madam: I am writing to inform you regarding the business entity of my client, Leading Edge Technologies
. This company is a Corporation, not a Limited Liability Company
. I have enclosed the Articles of Incorporation with this letter for your reference. I request that you update the Exemption to reflect the company' s true name. If we can provide any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us at 312- 201-8310 or via email at Jeffrev(a )Antonclli-Lavv·.com.

Attorneys for Lea effrey J. Antonelli Amelia Niemi

# Office of the Minnesota Secretary of State Minnesota Business Corporation/Articles of Incorporation Minnesota Statutes, 302A The individual(s) listed below who is (are each) 18 years ofage or older, hereby adopt(s) the following Articles ofIncorporation:
Article 1 CORPORATE NAME: Leading Edge Technologies, Inc. Article 2 REGISTERED OFFICE AND AGENT(S), IF ANY AT THAT OFFICE: Name Address : 524 Main Street South Winnebago MN 56098 USA Article 3 MAXIMUM SHARES THE CORPORATION MAY ISSUE: 

### toooo Article 4 INCORPORATOR(S): Name: Address: Robert D. Weerts 524 Main Street South Winnebago MN 56098

DURATION: PERPETUAL Ifyou submit an attachment, it will be incorporated into this document. Ifthe attachment conflicts with the information specifically set forth in this document, this document supersedes the data referenced in the attachment. By typing my name, I, the undersigned, certify that Iam signing this document as the person whose signature is required, or as agent oftheperson(s) whose signature would be required who has authorized me to sign this document on his/her behalf, or in both capacities. I further certify that Ihave completed all requiredfields, and that the information in this document is true and correct and in compliance with the applicable chapter of Minnesota Statutes. Iunderstand that by signing this document Iam subject to the penalties of perjury as setforth in Section 609.48 as if Ihadsigned this document under oath. SIGNED BY: 

### Robert D. 

### Weerts MAILING ADDRESS: None Provided EMAIL FOR OFFICIAL NOTICES: bobweerts @ bluevalleysod.com

### Work Item 725379500029 Original File Number 725379500029 STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE FILED 01/08/2014 11:59 PM

Mark Ritchie Secretary of State
**Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 October 2012 – Pelckmans Turnhout

(Case C-559/11)**

Articles 92(1) and 103(1), and first subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure – Directive 2005/29/EC – Unfair commercial practices – National legislation prohibiting the opening of an establishment seven days a week

1.                     *Approximation of laws – Unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices – Directive 2005/29 – Scope – National legislation
prohibiting the opening of an establishment seven days a week – Legislation which does not pursue objectives related to consumer
protection – Not included (European Parliament and Council Directive 2005/29) (see paras 20-24, operative part)*

2.                     *Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Reference which does not set out the reasons justifying a referral
to the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility (Art. 267 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 92 and
103(1)) (see paras 28-31)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rechtbank van koophandel te Antwerpen – Interpretation of Articles 34 TFEU, 35 TFEU, 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU and of Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) (OJ 2005 L 149, p. 22) – Concept of business-to-consumer commercial practices – Opening of an establishment seven days a week and advertising of that practice. |

**Operative part**

Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial
practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of
the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council
(‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) must be interpreted as meaning that it does not apply to national legislation, such
as that at issue in the main proceedings, which does not pursue objectives related to consumer protection.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the Annual Report of First Federal Bancshares ofArkansas, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

a)              The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

b)             The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of and for theperiod covered by the Report.
| Date:  |   | February 28, 2007 |   | /s/ Larry J. Brandt                      |
|--------|--------|-------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|   |   |              |   | Larry J. Brandt  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Order entered December 19, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00954
- CV
IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF LORIE R UTH BAKER

AND GREGORY JOSEPH F INSTER On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 17
- 13669



### O RDER The clerk’s and reporter’s record are overdue. By letter dated October 31, 2018, Dallas County District Clerk informed the Court that the record had bee n prepared but was being held for nonpayment. In the letter, Ms. Pitre acknowledges that appellant filed an affidavit of inability to pay on September 13, 2018. She further states that her office “will honor the affidavit for all requests filed on or aft er this date.” We ORDER Ms. Pitre to file the clerk’s record by December 28, 2018

. See T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 145(c).
We ORDER Glenda Finkley, Official Court Reporter for the 256th Judicial District Court, to file the reporter’s record by January 18, 2019

. See T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 145(c).
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Pitre, Ms. Finkley, and all parties. /s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.057-1 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) The following are incorporated by reference into this subpart: ( 1 ) “The Color Names Dictionary” in *Color: Universal Language and Dictionary of Names,* National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 440, December 1976.
( 2 ) “Development of a Laboratory Test for Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Smoke Signals,” National Bureau of Standards Report 4792, July 1956.
( b ) NBS Special Publication 440 may be obtained by ordering from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 (Order by SD Catalog No. C13.10:440).
( c ) NBS Report 4792 may be obtained from the Commandant (CG-ENG), Attn: Office of Design and Engineering Systems, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509.
( d ) Approval to incorporate by reference the materials listed in this section was obtained from the Director of the Federal Register on November 1 and 29, 1979. The materials are on file in the Federal Register library.
[CGD 76-048a, CGD 76-048b, 44 FR 73091, Dec. 17, 1979, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4782, Feb. 3, 1983; CGD 88-070, 53 FR 34536, Sept. 7, 1988; CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50467, Sept. 29, 1995; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50733, Sept. 27, 1996; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49237, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60157, Sept. 30, 2013]
220241706.1 47665/177885

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

D-14 KUTUB MESIWALA, M.D., 

 Defendant. 

 / 

No. 2:13-20892 

Honorable George Caram Steeh 

STIPULATED ORDER ADJOURNING SENTENCING DATE 

The United States and Defendant Kutub Mesiwala jointly stipulate and agree 

that the date of Defendant’s sentencing be adjourned from October 1, 2018 at 2:30 

p.m. until February 28, 2018 at 2:30 p.m. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Malisa Dubal (with consent) 

Malisa Dubal 

Assistant Deputy Chief 

U.S. Department of Justice 

Criminal Division, Fraud Section 

1400 New York Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

Phone: (202) 660-2001

Malisa.dubal@usdoj.gov

Counsel for United States 

/s/ Martin E. Crandall 

Martin E. Crandall 

500 Woodward Avenue, Suite 3500 

Detroit, MI 48226 

Phone: (313) 965-8413 

mcrandall@clarkhill.com

Counsel for Defendant Kutub Mesiwala

Dated: September 12, 2018 

Case 2:13-cr-20892-GCS-RSW ECF No. 477 filed 09/14/18 PageID.3477 Page 1 of 2
220241706.1 47665/177885

Having considered the Stipulation of the parties, and the Court being fully 

advised of the circumstances, 

IT IS ORDERED that the date of Defendant’s sentencing be adjourned 

from October 1, 2018 at 2:30 p.m. until February 28, 2018 at 2:30 p.m. 

Dated: September 14, 2018 s/George Caram Steeh 

Hon. George Caram Steeh 

United States District Judge 

Case 2:13-cr-20892-GCS-RSW ECF No. 477 filed 09/14/18 PageID.3478 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of the Final Accounting of Swane Autrop.

Decree of surrogate adjudging illegitimacy of appellants reversed, with new trial granted. Opinion by

Cullen, J.;

Dykman, J., dissenting.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.023-2 Type. ( a ) Hand combination flare and smoke distress signals specified by this subpart shall be of the type described in specification MIL-S-18655.
( b ) [Reserved]
# C_2012126EN.01001702.xml

| 28.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/17

---

Order of the General Court of 8 March 2012 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-126/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Social security - Reimbursement of medical expenses - Act adversely affecting an official - Implied refusal - Duty to state reasons - Appeal in part manifestly unfounded and in part manifestly inadmissible)

2012/C 126/35

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Curall and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment delivered by the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (single judge) on 14 December 2010 in Case F-1/10 Marcuccio v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, seeking the annulment in part of that judgment.

Marcuccio

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed in part as manifestly inadmissible and in part as manifestly devoid of any basis in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed in part as manifestly inadmissible and in part as manifestly devoid of any basis in law.

| 2. | The cross-appeal is dismissed in part as manifestly inadmissible and in part as manifestly devoid of any basis in law. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The cross-appeal is dismissed in part as manifestly inadmissible and in part as manifestly devoid of any basis in law.

| 3. | Mr Luigi Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Mr Luigi Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in the appeal.

| 4. | Each party shall bear its own costs of the cross-appeal. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Each party shall bear its own costs of the cross-appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 120, 16.4.2011.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       5,002,238
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  919,269
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,899,939
<PP&E>                                       2,700,103
<DEPRECIATION>                                 882,421
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,150,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,982,889
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       102,434
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,065,413
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,150,736
<SALES>                                          6,750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,521,204
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,145,636
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               252,356
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,547
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,891,335)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,891,335)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,891,335)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.29)


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 162
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 162.060-16 Changes to an approved ballast water management system (BWMS). ( a ) The manufacturer of a BWMS that is approved by the Coast Guard must notify the Commanding Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Center (MSC), in writing of any change in design or intended operational conditions of the BWMS.
( b ) The notification required by paragraph (a) of this section must include— ( 1 ) A description of the change and its advantages; and
( 2 ) An indication of whether or not the original BWMS will be discontinued.
( c ) After receipt of the notice and information, the Coast Guard will notify the manufacturer, in writing, of any tests or evaluations that must be conducted, and then determine if BWMS recertification and/or modification is required. The manufacturer may appeal this determination to the Director of Commercial Regulations. Contact Commandant (CG-5PS), Attn: Director of Commercial Regulations, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509.
[USCG-2001-10486, 77 FR 17311, Mar. 23, 2012, as amended by USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60161, Sept. 30, 2013]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
PowerCerv Corporation


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
S-8 Nos. 333-3960, 333-50621 and 333-90827) pertaining to the PowerCerv
Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan and (Form S-8 No. 333-90825) pertaining to
Stock Option Agreements of our report dated January 20, 2000, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of PowerCerv Corporation
included in the Annual Report (Form 10K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.


                                   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Tampa, Florida
April 13, 2001
#### § 118.600 Fire axe.

A vessel of more than 19.8 meters (65 feet) in length must have at least one fire axe located in or adjacent to the primary operating station.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 22-5176 September Term, 2022

1:21-cv-01665-TJK

Filed On: August 1, 2023 [2010589]

End Citizens United PAC, 

 Appellant

v.

Federal Election Commission, 

 Appellee

M A N D A T E

In accordance with the judgment of June 9, 2023, and pursuant to Federal Rule

of Appellate Procedure 41, this constitutes the formal mandate of this court.

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy

Deputy Clerk

Link to the judgment filed June 9, 2023

USCA Case #22-5176 Document #2010589 Filed: 08/01/2023 Page 1 of 1