alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Artificial Life,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Eberhard Schoneburg, chief executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 11, 2010




/s/  Eberhard Schoneburg Eberhard
Schoneburg Chief Executive Officer




24


---
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

              (All Subsidiaries are Wholly Owned by the Registrant)


Arterial Vascular Engineering B.V. (The Netherlands)

Arterial Vascular Engineering Canada, Inc. (Canada)

AVE Espana, S.L. (Spain)

Arterial Vascular Engineering GmbH (Germany)

AVE International Sales, Inc. (Barbados)

AVE Italia, S.r.l. (Italy)

AVE Manufacturing, Inc. (California)

Proprietary Extrusion Technologies, Inc. (California)

Arterial Vascular Engineering PTE. LTD. (Singapore)

Arterial Vascular Engineering SARL (France)

Arterial Vascular Engineering (Schweiz) AG (Switzerland)

Arterial Vascular Engineering UK Limited (United Kingdom)

AVE Portugal S.A. (Portugal)

AVE Massachusetts, Inc. (Delaware)
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

ALAN M. BARTLETT, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 16-0807 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2003-008581-001

The Honorable David O. Cunanan, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Phoenix

By Diane Meloche

Counsel for Respondent

Alan M. Bartlett, Phoenix

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Michael J. Brown, Judge Jennifer B. Campbell and Judge 

Margaret H. Downie delivered the decision of the Court.

FILED 10-10-2017
STATE v. BARTLETT

Decision of the Court

2

PER CURIAM: 

¶1 Petitioner Alan M. Bartlett seeks review of the superior court's 

order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to 

Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner's first petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) 

(petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court's order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion. 

¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review and deny relief.
#### § 143.600 Alternative standards for vessels that move tank barges carrying oil or hazardous material in bulk.

In lieu of meeting §§ 143.585 through 143.595, a towing vessel may comply with Sections 7-5 (class ABCU) and 3-5 (class R2) of Part 4 of the ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels Under 90 Meters (295 Feet) in Length (incorporated by reference, see § 136.112 of this subchapter), except that a vessel that operates exclusively on rivers or intracoastal waterways does not need to comply with 4-7-4/3.9 and the automatic day tank fill pump requirement of 4-7-4/25.3.
#### § 126.460 Tanks for dry bulk cargo.

The owner shall ensure that tanks for dry bulk cargo that are pressure vessels are inspected for compliance with § 61.10-5(b) of this chapter.
###### Editorial Note on Part 153

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 153.936 Illness, alcohol, drugs.

The master shall ensure that no person participates in cargo related operations who appears to be intoxicated by alcohol or drugs or to be so ill as to be unfit for the particular operation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      11,111,316
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,957,343
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     169,949,099
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,759,556
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             182,216,217
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,759,556
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,112
<OTHER-SE>                                  67,038,646
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               182,216,217
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,526,697
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,309,936
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,656,161
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                560,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            560,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   560,600
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Retail Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert D. Parks as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Barry L. Lazarus, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.X.C.



|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.



|/s/ ROBERT D. PARKS    
|-----------------------
|                       
|Name:	Robert D. Parks  
|Chief Executive Officer
|Date:	August 8, 2003   
|                       
|                       
|/s/ BARRY L. LAZARUS   
|                       
|Name:	Barry L. Lazarus 
|Chief Financial Officer
|Date:	August  8, 2003  
|                       



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 179.230 [Reserved]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MORRIS WEATHERSPOON, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cv-12789 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

GEORGE LNU, et al. 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION 

(ECF #44) AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS 

FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (ECF ##33-37) 

 On January 9, 2015, Magistrate Judge David R. Grand issued a Report and 

Recommendation (the “R&R,” ECF #44) recommending that the Court deny 

Plaintiff Morris Weatherspoon’s Motions for Default Judgment as to Defendants 

George LNU, Angie LNU, Tammy LNU, Dr. Abdullateef, and LNU Woern (the 

“Motions for Default Judgment,” ECF ##33, 34, 35, 36, and 37). The R&R stated 

that the parties could object to and seek review of the recommendation within 

fourteen days. (See the R&R at 3, Pg. ID 319.) 

 No party has objected to the R&R. Failure to file objections to the R&R 

waives any further right to appeal. See Howard v. Sec’y of Health and Human 

Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers Local 

231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the 

2:14-cv-12789-MFL-DRG Doc # 45 Filed 02/04/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 320
2 

Magistrate Judge’s R&R releases the Court from its duty to independently review 

the matter. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The Court has 

nevertheless reviewed the R&R and agrees with the findings and conclusions of 

the Magistrate Judge. 

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s January 

9, 2015, R&R (ECF #44) is ADOPTED as the Opinion of this Court. IT IS 

FURTHER ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the R&R, that Defendant’s 

Motions for Default Judgment (ECF ##33, 34, 35, 36, and 37) are DENIED.

s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: February 4, 2015 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on February 4, 2015, by electronic means and/or ordinary 

mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113 

2:14-cv-12789-MFL-DRG Doc # 45 Filed 02/04/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 321
§ 122.330 Hatches and other openings. ( a ) Except when operating on lakes, bays, and sounds, or river routes in calm weather, all hatches and openings in the hull, except loading doors, of a vessel must be kept tightly closed except when being used.
( b ) All watertight doors in subdivision bulkheads must be kept tightly closed during the navigation of the vessel except when being used for transit between compartments.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the
"Form 10-Q") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").

     I, Tracey A. Welsh, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of the Issuer, certify that to my knowledge:

     (i)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

Dated: November 14, 2008


                                        /s/ Tracey A. Welsh
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Tracey A. Welsh
                                        Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
                                        Officer and Treasurer
#### § 173.007 Location of the hook load.

When doing the calculations required in this subpart, the hook load must be considered to be located at the head of the crane.
§ 169.215 Certificate of inspection amendment. ( a ) An amended certificate of inspection may be issued at any time by any Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection. The amended certificate of inspection replaces the original. An amended certificate of inspection may be issued to authorize and record a change in the character of a vessel or in its route, equipment, ownership, operator, etc., from that specified in the current certificate of inspection.
( b ) A request for an amended certificate of inspection must be made to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, by the master, operator, owner, or agent of the vessel at any time there is a change in the character of a vessel or in its route, equipment, ownership, operation etc., as specified in its current certificate of inspection.
( c ) The OCMI may require an inspection prior to the issuance of an amended certificate of inspection.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR REHEARING 

Cause numbers and style: 01–12–00995-CR; Richard v. State

Date motion filed: July 22, 2013

Party filing motion: Appellant

It is ordered that appellant’s motion for rehearing is denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Justice’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

 Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Bland.

Date: July 30, 2013
2:15-cv-10724-SJM-EAS   Doc # 26-1   Filed 07/25/16   Pg 1 of 1    Pg ID 336
# C_2014093EN.01002201.xml

| 29.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2014 — Oetker Nahrungsmittel v OHIM (La qualité est la meilleure des recettes)

(Case T-570/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark La qualité est la meilleure des recettes - Mark constituted by an advertising slogan - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctiveness - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2014/C 93/36

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dr. August Oetker Nahrungsmittel KG (Bielefeld, Germany) (represented by: F. Graf von Stosch, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: K. Klüpfel and A. Schifko, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Grand Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 July 2011 (Case R 1798/2010-G) concerning an application for registration of word sign La qualité est la meilleure des recettes as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Dr. August Oetker Nahrungsmittel KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Dr. August Oetker Nahrungsmittel KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 14.1.2012.

1

---
# C_2011139EN.01003003.xml

| 7.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/30

---

Action brought on 18 February 2011 — Mariën v EEAS

(Case F-15/11)

2011/C 139/57

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Peter Mariën (Elsene, Belgium) (represented by: B. Theeuwes and F. Pons, attorneys)

Applicant:

Defendant: European External Action Service

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decision of Head of the EU Delegation to Afghanistan which ordered to members of this Delegation to leave their hotel and to move into a housing compound of the EU.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision contained in the e-mail message of January 11, 2011 of EU Special Representative and Head of the EU Delegation to Afghanistan ordering the Applicant to relocate on January 14, 2011 to the residential compound in Kabul, Afghanistan; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision contained in the e-mail message of January 11, 2011 of EU Special Representative and Head of the EU Delegation to Afghanistan ordering the Applicant to relocate on January 14, 2011 to the residential compound in Kabul, Afghanistan;

| — | order the EEAS to bear all costs relating to the temporary residence measures; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the EEAS to bear all costs relating to the temporary residence measures;

| — | order the EEAS to pay an indemnity of 10 000 euros to the Applicant for the psychological stress and harm caused; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the EEAS to pay an indemnity of 10 000 euros to the Applicant for the psychological stress and harm caused;

| — | order the EEAS to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the EEAS to pay the costs of the proceedings.

---
§ 169.627 Compartments containing diesel fuel tanks. Unless they are adequately ventilated, enclosed compartments or spaces containing diesel fuel tanks and no machinery must be provided with a gooseneck vent of not less than 21 ⁄ 2 inches in diameter. The vent opening must not be located adjacent to possible sources of vapor ignition.
###### Editorial Note on Part 164

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 164.012-12 Recognized laboratory.

A recognized laboratory is one which is operated as a nonprofit public service and is regularly engaged in the examination, testing, and evaluation as to the safety of insulation and surfacing materials; which has an established factory inspection, listing, and labeling program; and which has standards for evaluating listing and labeling which are acceptable to the Commandant. The following laboratories are recognized:

Underwriters' Laboratories, Inc.

333 Pfingston Road

Northbrook, IL 60062-2096

[CGFR 70-143, 35 FR 19967, Dec. 30, 1970, as amended by USCG-1998-4442, 63 FR 52192, Sept. 30, 1998]
§ 178.340 Stability standards for pontoon vessels on protected waters. ( a ) A pontoon vessel meeting the applicability requirements of § 178.320 of this part must be in the condition described in § 178.330(a) of this part when the PSST is performed, except that fuel, water and sewage tanks should either be empty or filled to 100 percent capacity, whichever is more conservative.
( b ) A pontoon vessel must not exceed the limitations in paragraph (c) of this section when subjected to the greater of the following heeling moments: Mpc = [(W)(Bp−K)]/2; or Mw = (P) (A) (H) Where: Mpc = passenger and crew heeling moment in foot-pounds (kilogram-meters); W = the total weight of passengers and crew aboard (total test weight) in pounds (kilograms); Bp = the maximum transverse distance of the deck accessible to passengers in feet (meters); K = 2.0 feet (0.61 meters); Mw = Wind heeling moment in foot-pounds (kilogram-meters) P = Wind pressure of 7.5 pounds/square foot (36.6 kilograms/square meter); A = Area, in square feet (square meters), of the projected lateral surface of the vessel above the waterline (including each projected area of the pontoons, superstructure and area bounded by railings and structural canopies); and H = Height, in feet (meters), of the center of area (A) above the waterline, measured up from the waterline.
( c ) With the appropriate heeling moment applied to the most adversely affected side of the vessel, the remaining exposed cross-sectional area of the pontoon must be equal to or greater than both— ( 1 ) The cross-sectional area submerged due to the load shift (for an example, see Figure 178.340(c)(1) of this section); and
( 2 ) One-quarter of the cross-sectional area on one pontoon.
( d ) A pontoon vessel must also be tested to determine whether trimming moments will submerge the bow or stern of the buoyant hull. The top of any pontoon must not be submerged at any location, as indicated in Figure 178.340(d) of this section, with the total test weight (W) located on the centerline and positioned as far forward or aft on the deck as practicable, whichever position results in the least freeboard.
[USCG-2007-0030, 75 FR 78089, Dec. 14, 2010]
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Barry L. Lazarus, the Chief Financial Officer of Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                               



|    |                        
|--- | -----------------------
|    | /s/ BARRY L. LAZARUS   
|    |                        
|By: | Barry L. Lazarus       
|    | Chief Financial Officer
|    | Date: May 7, 2004