alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Reclamation

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

As required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given that the Yakima River Basin Conservation Advisory Group, Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project, Yakima, Washington, established by the Secretary of the Interior, will hold a public meeting. The purpose of the Conservation Advisory Group is to provide technical advice and counsel to the Secretary of the Interior and Washington State on the structure, implementation, and oversight of the Yakima River Basin Water Conservation Program. 

# DATES:

Thursday, May 24, 2007, 10 a.m.-4 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

Bureau of Reclamation Office, 1917 Marsh Road, Yakima, Washington. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Walt Larrick, Acting Manager, Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project, 1917 Marsh Road, Yakima, Washington, 98901; 509-575-5848, extension 209. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of the meeting will be to review the option of using the acquired habitat lands to mitigate the impacts that occur from the planned conservation measures and develop recommendations. This meeting is open to the public.

Dated:  March 21, 2007. 

Walter Larrick,

Acting Program Manager, Pacific Northwest Region.

[FR Doc. 07-1833 Filed 4-20-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-MN-M
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2008208EN.01001301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 15.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 208/13 |

---

EU-27 ethyl alcohol balance for 2007

(Established on 10 July 2008 in accordance with Article 2 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003)

(2008/C 208/06)

| | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | EU-27 ethyl alcohol balance [(1)](#ntr1-C_2008208EN.01001301-E0001) for 2007 (Established on 10 July 2008 in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2008208EN.01001301-E0002) ) | | | Hectolitres of pure alcohol |
| 1. | Initial stock | | | 11 372 902 |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Agricultural origin | | | |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Non-agricultural origin | | | |
| 2. | Production | | | 39 226 999 |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Agricultural origin | | | | 33 045 474 |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Non-agricultural origin | | | | 6 181 525 |
| 3. | Imports[(2)](#ntr2-C_2008208EN.01001301-E0002) | | | 11 210 189 |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | 0 % duty | | | | 2 699 136 |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Reduced duty | | | | 0 |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | 100 % duty | | | | 8 511 053 |
| 4. | Total resources | | | 61 810 090 |
| 5. | Exports | | | 539 693 |
| 6. | Internal consumption | | | 47 540 467 |
| | Agricultural origin | Non-agricultural origin | Total |
| Food use | 9 030 093 | 0 | 9 030 093 |
| Industrial use | 7 358 351 | 6 027 198 | 13 385 549 |
| Fuel | 20 810 000 | 53 864 | 20 863 864 |
| Other | 4 216 459 | 44 502 | 4 260 960 |
| Total | 41 414 903 | 6 125 564 | |
| 7. | Final Stock | | | 13 729 930 |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Agricultural origin | | | |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | Non-agricultural origin | | | |
| Sources: Communications from the Member States/Eurostat Comext. | | | | |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2008208EN.01001301-E0001)  Includes only products falling within CN codes 2207 10, 2207 20, 2208 90 91 and 2208 90 99.

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2008208EN.01001301-E0002)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 2336/2003 of 30 December 2003 introducing certain detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 670/2003 laying down specific measures concerning the market in ethyl alcohol of agricultural origin ([OJ L 346 of 31.12.2003, p. 19](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2003_346_R_TOC)).

Sources: Communications from the Member States/Eurostat Comext.

---
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460



### APR 25 m OFFICEOF AIR AND RADIATION Dr. David C. Moody, Manager Carlsbad Field Office U.S. Department

of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad,

NM 88221 Dear Dr. Moody: This letter transmits

the Environmental

Protection

Agency's (EPA) 40 CFR 194.8 Guidance

Document

(EP A Docket No. A-98-49, II-A4-62). The guidance describes the process that EP A uses to conduct

wastecharacterization

(WC) programinspections at the U.S. Department

of Energy's (DOE) transuranic (TRU) wastesites

to establish

baseline compliance

decisions

for disposal

ofTRU waste

at the WasteIsolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). The objectiveof this document is to ~nsure

that responsible

individuals understand EP A's process

for the baseline

inspections

and compliance

decisions,

based on the requirements

of 40 CFR 194.8. EP

A believes

that this guidance

will assist

the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) andTRU wastegenerator sitesin preparing

for EP A inspections and approvals.The CBFO staff hasagreed to share an electronic

copy of this guidance with the TRU wastegenerator sites. Please contactRajani Joglekar

(202-343-9462)

or Ed Feltcom (202-343-9462) if you haveany questions. 

# 1 / 

# I / 

# 4 J~' 'v Bonnie Gitlin, Acting Director Radiation Protection Division Enclosure

cc (Electronic Distribution): A. Holland, CBFO K. Watson,

CBFO R. McCallister, CBFO

IntemetAddress(URL) 8 http:/~.epa.goy

RecycledlRecyclable 8 Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% PostconSUrTlef, Process ChIome Free Recycled Paper
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00250-CV

IN RE ALLBRITE CONSTRUCTORS OF TEXAS, INC.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 6, 2015

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On April 27, 2015, relator Allbrite Constructors of Texas, Inc. filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus and a motion for temporary relief pending a ruling on the mandamus petition. The court 

has considered the petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled 

to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and the motion for temporary 

relief are denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 392309, styled Allbrite Constructors of Texas, Inc. v. Tempel Builders, Inc. 

and John Doe, pending in the County Court at Law No. 2, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Karen Crouch 

presiding.
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.449 Model test. The following analyzed data of a model test of structural elements for independent tank type B must be submitted to the Commandant (CG-ENG) for special approval: ( a ) Stress concentration factors.
( b ) Fatigue life.
[CGD 74-289, 44 FR 26009, May 3, 1979, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4782, Feb. 3, 1983]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2138

ROY L. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ALTERNATIVE BEHAVIORAL SERVICES, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-03-903) Submitted: January 26, 2005 Decided: February 22, 2005 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roy L. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Warren David Harless, CHRISTIAN & BARTON, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Roy L. Williams appeals the district court order awarding summary judgment in favor of Alternative Behavioral Services on Williams’s claim of employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s thorough opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. Alternative Behavioral Servs. , No. CA-03-903 (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.451 Design vapor pressure.

The Po (kPa) of an independent tank type C must be calculated by the following formula:

Po = 196 + AC(ρ) 3⁄2

where:

A = 1.813 (σm/ΔσA)2;

σm = design primary membrane stress;

ΔσA = (allowable dynamic membrane stress for double amplitude at probability level Q = 10−8) 53.9 MPa (7821 psi) for ferritic and martensitic steels and 24.5 MPa (3555 psi) for 5083-0 aluminum;

C = a characteristic tank dimension that is the greatest of h, 0.75b, or 0.45 l;

where:

h = the height of the tank or the dimension in the vessel's vertical direction, in meters;

b = the width of the tank or the dimension in the vessel's transverse direction; in meters; and

l = the length of the tank or the dimension in the vessel's longitudinal direction, in meters; and

ρ = the specific gravity of the cargo.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 65 (Thursday, April 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 16770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1672]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Business Board; Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Business Board (DBB) will meet in open session on 
Thursday, April 26th at the Pentagon, Washington, DC, from 8:05 a.m. to 
8:50 a.m. The mission of the DBB is to advise the Secretary of Defense 
on effective strategies for implementation of best business practices 
of interest to the Department of Defense. At this meeting, the Board 
will deliberate on findings from three task groups: Task Group on 
Review of Prior DBB Supply Chain Reports, Task Group on Tooth-to-Tail 
Analysis, and Task Group on Developing a Framework for Analyzing 
Executive Level Compensation. Copies of DRAFT Task Group presentations 
will be made available on April 18th by contacting the DBB Office. 
Members of the public who wish to provide input to the board should 
submit written comments by 5 p.m., Monday, April 23rd to allow time for 
distribution to the Board members prior to the meeting. Additionally, 
those who wish to attend the meeting must contact the Defense Business 
Board no later than Noon on Monday, April 23rd, for further information 
about escort arrangements in the Pentagon.

DATES: Thursday, April 26th, 8:05 a.m. to 8:50 a.m.

ADDRESSES: 1155 Defense Pentagon, Room 3C288, Washington, DC 20301-
1155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Defense Business Board, 1155 Defense 
Pentagon, Room 3C288, Washington, DC 20301-1155, via e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#26424340434855434453554f4843555544494754421466495542084b4f4a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cbafaeadaea5b8aea9beb8a2a5aeb8b8a9a4aab9aff98ba4b8afe5a6a2a7">[email protected]</span></a> or via phone at (703) 697-2168.

    Dated: March 30, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.
[FR Doc. 07-1672 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### JOHN J. HARRIS, TRADING AS JOHN J. HARRIS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PLAINTIFF, v. C. H. EARLE, INCORPORATED, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.

Submitted May term, 1929

Decided November 7, 1929.

Before Justices Tbenchakd, Lloyd and Case.

*962Eor the rule, *Higbee & Higbee.*

Gontra, *Edward S. Sharpless.*

Per Curiam.

This is defendant’s rule for new trial based on reasons that the verdict is contrary to and inconsistent with the pleadings, that the verdict is contrary to and inconsistent with the judge’s charge, and that it is against the weight of the evidence.

The contention of the defendant on the first point is that while the complaint alleges one form of contract, the recovery was on another form. The action was to recover rental of a steam shovel belonging to the plaintiff, and for certain wage claims which had been assigned to the plaintiff. The complaint alleged that the rental of the shovel was for the period of one month with an option to extend it for a longer time, and that during the time the defendant was using the shovel it was agreed that the extended period should be for the two additional months.

The defense was a denial of the contract as set forth in the complaint and contended that the real contract was that the shovel should be paid for at the rate of $500 per month while actually used. The whole arrangement was oral. Plaintiff’s proof tended to show that there was initially a three months’ contract at $500 per month. This came in without objection. The judge submitted the question to the jury on that issue and the jury found a verdict for the plaintiff for $983.13. This award to the plaintiff was for practically the whole amount claimed.

The substantial ground of criticism being that the proofs differed from the complaint and the case having been tried on both sides without objection, with the evidence varying slightly from the allegations in the pleadings, the defendant has on this phase of the case no cause for complaint.

Our reading of the record convinces us that the verdict is neither contrary to the weight of the evidence nor to the charge of the court.

The rule for new trial will be discharged.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 77 (Monday, April 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2031]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

United States Parole Commission

Public Announcement: Pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine 
Act (Pub. L. 94-409) [5 U.S.C. Section 552b]

Agency Holding Meeting: Department of Justice, United States Parole 
Commission.

Date and Time: 11:30 a.m., Thursday, April 26, 2007.

Place: U.S. Parole Commission, 5550 Friendship Boulevard, 4th Floor, 
Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815.

Status: Closed.

Matters Considered: The following matters will be considered during the 
closed portion of the Commission's Business Meeting:
    Petitions for reconsideration involving four original jurisdiction 
cases pursuant to 28 CFR 2.27.

Agency Contact: Thomas W. Hutchison, Chief of Staff, United States 
Parole Commission, (301) 492-5990.

    Dated: April 18, 2007.
Rockne Chickinell,
General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-2031 Filed 4-19-07; 8:44 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
```
#### § 174.050 Stability on bottom.

Each bottom bearing unit must be designed so that, while supported on the sea bottom with footings or a mat, it continually exerts a downward force on each footing or the mat when subjected to the forces of wave and current and to wind blowing at the velocities described in § 174.055(b)(3).
###### Editorial Note on Part 148

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59783, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 148.11 Hazardous or potentially dangerous characteristics.

(a) General. When Column 5 refers to a code for a hazardous material or PDM, the meaning of that code is set forth in this section.

(b) Table of Hazardous or Potentially Dangerous Characteristics.

| Code | Hazardous or potentially dangerous characteristic |
| --- | --- |
| 1 | Contact with water may cause heating. |
| 2 | Contact with water may cause evolution of flammable gases, which may form explosive mixtures with air. |
| 3 | Contact with water may cause evolution of toxic gases. |
| 4 | If involved in a fire, will greatly intensify the burning of combustible materials. |
| 5 | A major fire aboard a vessel carrying this material may involve a risk of explosion in the event of contamination (*e.g.,* by a fuel oil) or strong confinement. If heated strongly will decompose, giving off toxic gases that support combustion. |
| 6 | These mixtures may be subject to self-sustaining decomposition if heated. Decomposition, once initiated, may spread throughout the remainder, producing gases that are toxic. |
| 7 | Toxic if swallowed and by dust inhalation. |
| 8 | Harmful and irritating by dust inhalation. |
| 9 | Highly corrosive to steel. |
| 10 | Powerful allergen. Toxic by ingestion. Skin contact or inhalation of dust may cause severe irritation of skin, eyes, and mucous membranes in some people. |
| 11 | May be susceptible to spontaneous heating and ignition. |
| 12 | Liable to cause oxygen depletion in the cargo space. |
| 13 | Liable to emit methane gas which can form explosive mixtures with air. |
| 14 | Dust forms explosive mixtures with air. |
| 15 | May present substantial danger to the public health or welfare or the environment when released into the environment. Skin contact and dust inhalation should be avoided. |
| 16 | Combustible. Burns with dense black smoke. Dust may cause skin and eye irritation. |
| 17 | Radiation hazard from dust inhalation and contact with mucous membranes. |
| 18 | Susceptible to fire from sparks and open flames. |
| 19 | May self-heat slowly and, if wet or containing an excessive proportion of unoxidized oil, ignite spontaneously. |
| 20 | Fire may produce irritating or poisonous gases. |
| 21 | Dust may contain toxic constituents. |
| 22 | Lead nitrate and lead sulfide are hazardous substances; see code 15 of this table and § 148.270. |
| 23 | Hazardous substance when consisting of pieces having a diameter less than 100 micrometers (0.004 in.); see code 15 of this table and § 148.270. |
| 24 | Cargo subject to liquefaction. |
| 25 | Subject to liquefaction if average particle size of cargo is less than 10 mm (.394 in.). |
| 26 | This entry is considered a Marine Pollutant in accordance with 49 CFR 172.101 Appendix B. |
| 27 | This entry is considered a certain dangerous cargo in accordance with 33 CFR 160.202. |

[75 FR 64591, Oct. 19, 2010, as amended by USCG-2005-21869, 80 FR 5336, Jan. 30, 2015]
•1 

'. I ^""v l Building Sustainable Brands and Businesses 

I IASPIHE 

INTElllSENC i 

March 5, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood ^ i 

Secretary r-^ 

United States Department of Transportation v: | 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 ^^^S 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-001&._ S 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

As a dedicated travel partner of American Airlines, I am writing in support of American's 

application to provide new service from New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport 

and Los Angeles International Airport to Tokyo International Airport at Haneda. 

I recognize and applaud you and the Obama administration for your: uccess last December 

in reaching a landmark Open Skits agreement with Japan, which opens cp Haneda to service 

by U.S. airlines. 

I encourage your selection of American Airlines to provide nonstop service from New York 

and Los Angeles to Haneda in order to provide an essential connection between three of the 

vvorli!' financis! ?nd commerce centers. 

Recen:: events, includ. ;g the successful preservation of Japan Airlines' oneworld Alliance 

membership, K.^ve underscored American's strong commitment to the trans-Pacific markst. 

Ameriran is likewise committed to New York and Los Angles - both vital focal points of 

business, trade, entertainment, technology and education - providing unsurpassed air 

service since the mid-1900s 

3oth the New York anrO tos Angeles metro areas will gain significant economic benefits from 

these proposed new riights, as will American's customers and employees. However, we need 

your help to make the JFK/Haneda connection a reality. 

Therefore, i Sirongly urge you to say YES to American Airlines and its request for slots to fly 

from Ken.iedy to HaiiL-da! ' 

Sincerely, 

NatsiSv^W. LipsCt; 

I. •• 

ASPIRE Intelligence LLC ' 

750 Third Avenue #941 New York, NY 10017 

Phone: 212-527-7540 • Fax; 212-504-8192 • E-mail: info@aspireintelligence.com 

'iS;='' • V.-, • , / r*..
§ 163.002-15 Performance. ( a ) Each pilot hoist must have sufficient performance capability to pass the approval tests in § 163.002-21.
( b ) [Reserved]
Order entered May 6 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00860
- CV
LINDA HENDERSON , Appellant

V. ALTURA REALTY LLC , Appellee On Appeal from the County Court a t Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 21
- 03582
- E

O RDER By letter dated March 31, 2022 we n otified appellant her brief was not in compliance with rule 38 of the T exas Rules of Appellate Procedure and directed
her to file a n amended bri e f with ten days. Appella nt declined to do so.
Acc ordingly, we ORDER the app eal submi tted on appel lant ’ s March 29, 2022 amended brief. Appellee ’ s brief is due THIRTY DAYS from the dat e of this order./s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE