alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 162
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 162.161-2 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this subpart with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce any edition other than that specified in this section, the Coast Guard must publish a notice of change in the Federal Register and the material must be available to the public. All approved material is available for inspection at Coast Guard Headquarters. Contact Commandant (CG-OES), Attn: Office of Operating and Environmental Standards, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509. The material is also available from the sources indicated in this section, and is available from the sources listed below. It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( b ) International Maritime Organization (IMO), Publications Section, 4 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR, United Kingdom, telephone + 44 (0)20 7735 7611, *www.imo.org .* ( 1 ) MSC/Circ. 848, Revised Guidelines for The Approval of Equivalent Fixed Gas Fire-Extinguishing Systems, as Referred to in SOLAS 74, for Machinery Spaces and Cargo Pump-Rooms (June 8, 1998), (“MSC/Circ. 848”), IBR approved for § 162.161-6.
( 2 ) MSC.1/Circ. 1267, Amendments to Revised Guidelines for the Approval of Equivalent Fixed Gas Fire-Extinguishing Systems, as Referred to in SOLAS 74, for Machinery Spaces and Cargo Pump-Rooms (MSC/Circ. 848) (June 4, 2008), (“MSC.1/Circ. 1267”), IBR approved for § 162.161-6.
( c ) National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471, telephone 617-770-3000, *http://www.nfpa.org .* ( 1 ) NFPA 2001, Standard on Clean Agent Fire Extinguishing Systems, 2008 Edition, (“NFPA 2001”), IBR approved for §§ 162.161-1 and 162.161-3.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( d ) Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. (UL), 333 Pfingsten Road, Northbrook, IL 60062, telephone 847-272-8800, *www.ul.com .* ( 1 ) UL 2127, Standard for Safety forInert Gas Clean Agent Extinguishing System Units (Revised March 22, 2001), (“UL 2127”), IBR approved for §§ 162.161-5, 162.161-6 and 162.161-7.
( 2 ) UL 2166, Standard for Safety for Halocarbon Clean Agent Extinguishing System Units (Revised March 22, 2001), (“UL 2166”), IBR approved for §§ 162.161-5, 162.161-6 and 162.161-7.
[USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33886, June 7, 2012, as amended by USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60161, Sept. 30, 2013]
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**ANNUAL SERVICER’SCERTIFICATE**

 

**WORLD FINANCIALNETWORK NATIONAL BANK**

 

**WORLD FINANCIALNETWORK CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST**

 

                The undersigned, a duly authorizedrepresentative of World Financial Network National Bank, as Servicer("WFN"), pursuant to the Second Amendment and Restated Pooling andServicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2001 (as may be amended andsupplemented from time to time, the "*Agreement*"),among WFN Credit Company, LLC, as Transferor, WFN, as Servicer, and BNY MidwestTrust Company (successor to the corporate trust administration of Harris Trustand Savings Bank, successor to The Bank of New York), as Trustee, does herebycertify that:

 

1.     WFNis, as of the date hereof, Servicer under the Agreement.  Capitalized terms used in this Certificatehave their respective meanings as set forth in the Agreement.

 

2.     Theundersigned is a Servicing Officer who is duly authorized pursuant to theAgreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to Trustee.

 

3.     Areview of the activities of Servicer during the fiscal year ended December 31,2002, and of its performance under the Agreement was conducted under mysupervision.

 

4.     Basedon such review, Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, performed in allmaterial respects its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year andno default in the performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuingexcept as set forth in *paragraph 5*.

 

5.     Thefollowing is a description of each default in the performance of Servicer’sobligations under the provisions of the Agreement known to me to have been madeby Servicer during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, which sets forth indetail (i) the nature of each such default, (ii) the action taken by Servicer,if any, to remedy each such default and (iii) the current status of each suchdefault:  if applicable, insert “None.”

 

NONE

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasduly executed this Certificate this

 

28th day of March , 2003

 

 

 
|   | **WORLD FINANCIAL NETWORK NATIONAL BANK,** |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   | as Servicer,                               |
|   |                                       |
|   | By                                         | /s/ Daniel  T. Groomes |   |
|   |                                       |
|   | Name: Daniel  T. Groomes                   |
|   | Title:  President                          |

 

----
§ 96.2 Definitions. ( a ) *Secretary* means the Secretary of Health and Human Services or his designee.
( b ) *Department* means the Department of Health and Human Services.
( c ) *Reconciliation Act* means the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981 (Pub. L. 97-35).
( d ) *State* includes the fifty States, the District of Columbia, and as appropriate with respect to each block grant, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and for purposes of the block grants administered by agencies of the Public Health Service, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Republic of Palau.
[47 FR 29486, July 6, 1982, as amended at 52 FR 37965, Oct. 13, 1987; 64 FR 55856, Oct. 15, 1999]
#### Bernard Grimes, *Appellant, v.*The People of the State of New York, *Respondent*.

Same as last case.
# C_2014039EN.01002001.xml

| 8.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/20

---

Order of the General Court of 10 December 2013 — Carbunión v Council

(Case T-176/11) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - State aid - Decision on aid intended to facilitate the closure of uncompetitive coal mines - Partial annulment - Non-severability - Inadmissibility)

2014/C 39/33

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Federación Nacional de Empresarios de Minas de Carbón (Carbunión) (Madrid (Spain)) (represented by: K. Desai, Solicitor, S. Cisnal de Ugarte and M. Peristeraki, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented initially by: F. Florindo Gijón and A. Lo Monaco, and subsequently by: F. Florindo Gijón and K. Michoel, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by É. Gippini Fournier, L. Flynn and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for partial suspension of operation of Council Decision 2010/787/EU of 10 December 2010 on State aid to facilitate the closure of uncompetitive coal mines (OJ 2010 L 336, p. 24)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as being inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

| 2. | The Federación Nacional de Empresarios de Minas de Carbón (Carbunión) shall, in addition to bearing its own costs, pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Federación Nacional de Empresarios de Minas de Carbón (Carbunión) shall, in addition to bearing its own costs, pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures.

| 3. | The European Commission shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The European Commission shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 152, 21.5.2011.

1

---
# C_2011370EN.01001602.xml

| 17.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/16

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 26 September 2011 — IBIS S.r.l. v PARTIUM ’70 Műanyagipari Zrt.

(Case C-490/11)

2011/C 370/27

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: IBIS S.r.l.

Applicant:

Defendant: PARTIUM ’70 Műanyagipari Zrt.

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Are the provisions of Article 45(1) and (2) of Council Regulation 44/2001/EC (1) of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters to be interpreted as meaning that a court in the Member State in which recognition is sought may, in the appeal procedure under Article 45, refuse an application for a declaration of enforceability of a foreign judgment if the certificate referred to in Article 54 of that Regulation was issued without the conditions contained in Article 66(2)(a) or (b) thereof having been met? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are the provisions of Article 45(1) and (2) of Council Regulation 44/2001/EC (1) of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters to be interpreted as meaning that a court in the Member State in which recognition is sought may, in the appeal procedure under Article 45, refuse an application for a declaration of enforceability of a foreign judgment if the certificate referred to in Article 54 of that Regulation was issued without the conditions contained in Article 66(2)(a) or (b) thereof having been met?

1

| 2. | If so, how is Article 35(3) of that Regulation to be interpreted in relation to the application of Article 66 thereof? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If so, how is Article 35(3) of that Regulation to be interpreted in relation to the application of Article 66 thereof?

| 3. | Does Article 1(2)(d) of the Regulation [permit] the possibility of refusal of an application for a declaration of enforceability on the basis of the certificate issued by the court of origin, if it is apparent from the judgment in respect of which the certificate was issued that there is an arbitration clause? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Does Article 1(2)(d) of the Regulation [permit] the possibility of refusal of an application for a declaration of enforceability on the basis of the certificate issued by the court of origin, if it is apparent from the judgment in respect of which the certificate was issued that there is an arbitration clause?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1).

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                      9
<LEGEND>   THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VALLEY RIDGE FINANCIAL CORP. AND
SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000

<S>                                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                     4,916
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                           2,600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>               18,785
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                   84,487
<ALLOWANCE>                                1,182
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           115,647
<DEPOSITS>                                94,536
<SHORT-TERM>                                 401
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          688
<LONG-TERM>                                8,000
<COMMON>                                   4,961
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                 5,665
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           115,647
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            7,805
<INTEREST-INVEST>                          1,128
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             208
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           9,142
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         3,161
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         3,523
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      5,618
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                117
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            11
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            5,011
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            1,580
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 1,580
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                               1,214
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               2.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 0
<LOANS-NON>                                  155
<LOANS-PAST>                                 560
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           1,109
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                100
<RECOVERIES>                                  56
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          1,182
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         535
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      647



</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 28, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 66538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2016-22887]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2016-0315; FRL-9952-72-Region 4]

Air Plan Approval; Georgia; Prong 4--2008 Ozone, 2010 NO2, SO2, 
and 2012 PM2.5

Correction

    In rule document 2016-22887 beginning on page 65899 in the issue of 
Monday, September 26, 2016, make the following correction:
    On page 65899, in the second column, under the DATES heading, in 
the first through third lines of that paragraph, '' [insert date 30 
days after date of publication in the Federal Register].'' should read 
``October 26, 2016''.

[FR Doc. C1-2016-22887 Filed 9-27-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 1301-00-D
```
SERVED: JUNE 11, 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

.WASHINGTON, DC '-.; IN THE MATTERS OF

COLGAN AIR, INC. FAA DOCKETNOS. CP09EA0002 AND CP09EA0005 (Civil Penalty Actions) FDMS NOS. FAA-2009-0025 AND FAA-2009-0028

NOTICE OF PREHEARING CONFERENCE A Prehearing Telephone Conference is scheduled on Wednesday, July 31, 2013, at 2:30 p.m., EasternTime. All parties should be prepared to discuss all issues andfacts at issue. Each party shall ensure that the Judge receives all documents that have been exchanged and that have not already beenprovidedto the Judge by Wednesday, July 24, 2013. Pursuant to Section 556 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 

### § 556(c)(8), eachparty shall be represented by
someone who has authority to negotiate concerning resolution ofall issues incontroversy.
SO ORDERED.

ChiefAdministrative.
..·Law J**~** Attachment

- Service List' <

FAA DocketNos. CP09EA0002 & CP09EA0005 (Civil Penalty Actions)

SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl0001 ONE COPY (VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL, FOLLOWING FAXED COURTESY COPY) Mark A. Dombroff& Charles W. Ryan, III,



### Respondent's Counsel DOMBROFF GILMORE JAQUES &

FRENCH, P.C. 1676 International Drive- Penthouse McLean, VA 22102 TEL: 703-336-8700 FAX: 703-336-8750 W. Chris Harrison, 

### Counsel for PinnacleAirlines, Corp. In-House Counsel Pilmacle Airlines, Corp. 40 S. Main Street, 14thFloor Memphis, TN 38103 TEL: 901-348-2483 Colgan Air, Inc., 

### Respondent One Commerce Square 40 S. Main St. Memphis, TN 38103 Christian L. Lewerenz, 

### Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, EAL-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3273 FAX: 718-995-5699 The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder,



### Chief Administrative LawJudge U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofHearings, M-20, RoomE12-320 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2142 FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expeditedcourier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 lnqependence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.

### -2-
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.1340 Temperature measuring devices. ( a ) Each cargo tank must have devices that measure the temperature: ( 1 ) At the bottom of the tank; and
( 2 ) Near the top of the tank and below the maximum liquid level allowed under § 154.1844.
( b ) Each device required by paragraph (a) must have a readout at the cargo control station.
( c ) Except for independent tanks type C, each cargo containment system for a design temperature colder than −55 °C (−67 °F) must have temperature measuring devices that meet the following: ( 1 ) The number and location of the devices must be specially approved by the Commandant (CG-OES).
( 2 ) The devices must be within the cargo tank's insulation or on the adjacent hull structure.
( 3 ) Each device must show the temperature continuously or at regular intervals of one hour or less.
( 4 ) Each device must actuate an audible and visual alarm at the cargo control station and a remote group alarm in the wheelhouse before the temperature of the steel of the adjacent hull structure is cooled below the lowest temperature allowed for the steel under § 154.172.
( d ) For each cargo tank with a design temperature colder than −55 °C (−67 °F), the number and arrangement of the devices that show the temperature of the tank during cool down procedures must be specially approved by the Commandant (CG-OES).
[CGD 74-289, 44 FR 26009, May 3, 1979, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4782, Feb. 3, 1983]
EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned  hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive  Officer of
Belcrest Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

(a)  the  Quarterly  Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
     31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund
     for such period.

Date:  May 10, 2005


                                /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.
                                -----------------------
                                Thomas E. Faust Jr.
                                Chief Executive Officer




A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to the Fund  and will be  retained  by the Fund and  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.156-19 Operating instructions and information for the ship's training manual. ( a ) Each rescue boat must have instructions and information for the ship's training manual, that use the symbols from IMO Res. A.760(18) (incorporated by reference, see § 160.156-5 of this subpart) to describe the location and operation of the rescue boat.
( b ) The instructions and information required by paragraph (a) of this section may be combined with similar material for survival craft and rescue boats, and their launching systems.
( c ) The rescue boat manufacturer must make the instructions and information required by paragraph (a) of this section available— ( 1 ) In English to purchasers of a rescue boat approved by the Coast Guard; and
( 2 ) In the form of an instruction placard providing simple procedures and illustrations for operation of the rescue boat. The placard must be not greater than 36 cm (14 in) by 51 cm (20 in), and must be made of durable material and suitable for display near installations of rescue boats on vessels.
# C_2013352EN.01001301.xml

| 30.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/13

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2013 — TF1 v Commission

(Case T-275/11) (1)

1

(State aid - Public service broadcasting - Aid proposed by the French authorities for France Télévisions - Annual budgetary grant - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market - Article 106(2) TFEU - Strict interdependence of a tax and an aid measure)

2013/C 352/23

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Télévision française 1 (TF1) (Boulogne-Billancourt, France) (represented initially by J.-P Hordies and C. Smits, and subsequently by J. Vogel, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and D. Grespan, Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented initially by M. Muñoz Pérez, then by S. Centeno Huerta and subsequently by N. Díaz Abad, Abogados del Estato); French Republic (represented initially by G. de Bergues and J. Gstalter, and subsequently by D. Colas and J. Rossi, Agents); and France Télévisions (Paris, France) (represented by: J.-P. Gunther and A. Giraud, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2011/140/EU of 20 July 2010 on State Aid C-27/09 (ex N 34/B/09) Budgetary grant for France Télévisions which the French Republic plans to implement in favour of France Télévisions (OJ 2011 L 59, p. 44).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Télévision française 1 (TF1) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and by France Télévisions; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Télévision française 1 (TF1) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and by France Télévisions;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain and the French Republic each to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain and the French Republic each to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 232, 6.8.2011.

1

---