alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019044EN.01005002.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/50

---

Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — VMS Deutschland v Commission

(Case T-613/11) (1)

((State aid - German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying losses forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market - Annulment of the contested measure by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2019/C 44/64)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: VMS Deutschland Holdings GmbH (Darmstadt, Germany) (represented by: initially, D. Pohl, G. Burwitz, M. Maier and P. Werner, then, D. Pohl and G. Burwitz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Adam, then, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially T. Henze, K. Petersen and R. Kanitz, then, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and K. Stranz and finally, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and S. Eisenberg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel) (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 26).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action;

| 2. | The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by VMS Deutschland Holdings GmbH; |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by VMS Deutschland Holdings GmbH;

| 3. | The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Varsity Group Inc. (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                    |  |                  |  |                                                                   
|------------------- |  | ---------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    | 
|Dated: May 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Eric J. Kuhn
|                    |  |                  |  | Eric J. Kuhn Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Denise Nitti

Plaintiff,

v.

Asset Acceptance, LLC

Defendant.

Case No. 2:14-cv-14900-AC-RSW

Judge: Avern Cohn

Magistrate Judge: R. Steven Whalen

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Now comes Plaintiff, through counsel, to notify the Court that the parties 

have reached a settlement. The parties are currently working on facilitating the 

settlement. Plaintiff expects to dismiss this case within sixty days.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

By: s/ David M. Menditto____ 

David M. Menditto

Attorney for Plaintiff

Hyslip & Taylor, LLC, LPA

1100 W. Cermak Rd., Suite B410

Chicago, IL 60608

Phone: 312-380-6110

Email: davidm@fairdebt411.com

Illinois Bar No. 6216541

Case 2:14-cv-14900-AC-RSW ECF No. 11, PageID.40 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 17, 2015, I electronically filed the foregoing 

Notice. Service of this filing will be made by the Court’s CM/ECF System upon 

the following:

Theodore W. Seitz

Dykema Gossett, PLLC

201 Townsend Street, Suite 900

Lansing, MI 48933

Counsel for:

Asset Acceptance, LLC

 

s/ David M. Menditto

Case 2:14-cv-14900-AC-RSW ECF No. 11, PageID.41 Filed 03/17/15 Page 2 of 2
§ 143.565 Electrical overcurrent protection other than generators and motors. ( a ) *General requirement.* Power and lighting circuits on towing vessels must be protected by suitable overcurrent protection.
( b ) *Specific requirements.* ( 1 ) Cable and wiring used in power and lighting circuits must have overcurrent protection that opens the circuit at the standard setting closest to 80 percent of the manufacturer's listed ampacity. Overcurrent protection setting exceptions allowed by NFPA's National Electrical Code (NEC), Article 240 (incorporated by reference, see § 136.112 of this subchapter) may be employed.
( 2 ) If the manufacturer's listed ampacity is not known, tables referenced in Article 310.15(B) of the NEC (incorporated by reference, see § 136.112 of this subchapter) must be used, assuming a temperature rating of 75 °C and an assumed temperature of 50 °C for machinery spaces and 40 °C for other spaces.
( 3 ) Overcurrent protection devices must be installed in a manner that will not open the path to ground in a circuit; only ungrounded conductors must be protected. Overcurrent protection must be coordinated such that an overcurrent situation is cleared by the circuit breaker or fuse nearest to the fault.
( 4 ) Each transformer must have protection against overcurrent that meets Article 450 of the NEC (incorporated by reference, see § 136.112 of this subchapter).
( 5 ) On a towing vessel, other than an excepted vessel as defined in § 136.110 of this subchapter, essential systems and non-essential systems must not be on the same circuit or share the same overcurrent protective device.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b)
      AND 15d-14(b)**




**(Section 906
      Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002)**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of International Imaging Systems, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Li Gaihong, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge and belief:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of
                the
                Company.




Date:
                November 13, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                Li GaihongLi
                Gaihong, Chief Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Financial Officer)




This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
      of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59783, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 148.310 Seed cake. ( a ) This part does not apply to solvent-extracted rape seed meal, pellets, soya bean meal, cotton seed meal, or sunflower seed meal that— ( 1 ) Contains a maximum of 4 percent vegetable oil and a maximum of 15 percent vegetable oil and moisture combined; and
( 2 ) As far as practical, is free from flammable solvent.
( b ) This part does not apply to mechanically expelled citrus pulp pellets containing not more than 2.5 percent oil and a maximum of 14 percent oil and moisture combined.
( c ) Before loading, the seed cake must be aged per the instructions of the shipper.
( d ) Before loading, the shipper must give the master or person in charge of a barge a certificate from a competent testing laboratory stating the oil and moisture content of the seed cake.
( e ) The seed cake must be kept as dry as practical at all times.
( f ) If the seed cake is solvent-extracted, it must be— ( 1 ) As free as practical from flammable solvent; and
( 2 ) Stowed in a mechanically ventilated hold.
( g ) For a voyage with a planned duration greater than 5 days, the vessel must be equipped with facilities for introducing carbon dioxide or another inert gas into the hold.
( h ) Temperature readings of the seed cake must be taken at least once in every 24-hour period. If the temperature exceeds 55 °C (131 °F) and continues to increase, ventilation to the cargo hold must be discontinued. If heating continues after ventilation has been discontinued, carbon dioxide or the inert gas required under paragraph (g) of this section must be introduced into the hold. If the seed cake is solvent-extracted, the use of inert gas must not be introduced until fire is apparent, to avoid the possibility of igniting the solvent vapors by the generation of static electricity.
( i ) Seed cake must be carried under the terms of a Special Permit issued by the Commandant (CG-ENG-5) per subpart B of this part if— ( 1 ) The oil was mechanically expelled; and
( 2 ) It contains more than 10 percent vegetable oil or more than 20 percent vegetable oil and moisture combined.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 (the
"Form 10-Q") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").



I, Tracey A. Welsh, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary and Treasurer of the Issuer, certify that to my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
                                         13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
                                         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 14, 2017



| | /s/ Tracey A. Welsh                                                    
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Tracey A. Welsh                                                        
| | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
# Notice of Intention To Enter Into a Free Trade Agreement With Panama

Consistent with section 2105(a)(1)(A) of the Trade Act of 2002, I have notified the Congress of my intention to enter into a free trade agreement with the Republic of Panama.

                        Consistent with section 2105(a)(1)(A) of that Act, this notice shall be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

[FR Doc. 07-1647

Billing code 3195-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MICHAEL MILES, Individually, 

 Plaintiff, CASE NO.: 4:15-cv-10130 

 HON. TERRENCE G. BERG 

v. MAG. ELIZABETH A. STAFFORD 

THE BON-TON DEPARTMENT 

STORES, INC., a Pennsylvania 

Corporation, 

 Defendant. 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL 

________________________________________________________________ 

OWEN B. DUNN, JR. (P66315) AUDREY J. FORBUSH (P41744) 

LAW OFFICE OF OWEN B. DUNN, JR. PLUNKETT COONEY 

Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant 

The Ottawa Hills Shopping Center Plaza One Financial Center 

4334 W. Central Avenue – Suite 222 111 E. Court Street – Suite 1B 

Toledo, OH 43615 Flint, MI 48502 

(419) 241-9661 (810) 342-7014 

(419) 241-9737 – fax (810) 232-3159 – fax 

dunnlawoffice@sbcglobal.net aforbush@plunkettcooney.com

__________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the 

parties hereto, through their respective counsel, that the above-entitled cause of 

action be dismissed with prejudice, and without costs, interest or attorney fees to 

either party. 

Case 4:15-cv-10130-TGB-EAS ECF No. 6 filed 03/11/15 PageID.19 Page 1 of 2
By /s/Owen B. Dunn, Jr. (w/consent) By /s/ Audrey J. Forbush 

 OWEN B. DUNN, JR. (P66315) AUDREY J. FORBUSH (P41744) 

 Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

 

 Upon the reading and filing of the foregoing stipulation of the parties; and 

the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled cause of action be and 

the same is hereby dismissed with prejudice, and without costs, interest or attorney 

fees to either party. 

 This resolves the last pending claims in this matter and closes the case. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

 s/Terrence G. Berg 

 TERRENCE G. BERG 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: March 11, 2015 

 Flint, Michigan 

Case 4:15-cv-10130-TGB-EAS ECF No. 6 filed 03/11/15 PageID.20 Page 2 of 2
# C_2016098EN.01006202.xml

| 14.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/62

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 January 2016 — Schwander v Commission

(Case F-138/11) (1)

1

(2016/C 098/81)

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 3/3/2012, p. 24.

1

---
MIE (Rev. 9/09) Order Re: Disqualification of Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Plaintiff(s), Case No. 

v. Honorable

Defendant(s).

/

ORDER RE: DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455, I hereby DISQUALIFY myself from the above-styled case.

IT IS ORDERED that in accordance with E.D. Mich. LR 83.11(d), this case be reassigned by blind draw

to another judge of this court.

Date:

U.S. District Judge

Pursuant to this order, this case is reassigned to Judge .

Case assignment credit will be given to the appropriate Judicial Officers.

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on this date a copy of the foregoing Order was served upon the parties and/or counsel

of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail.

Date:

Deputy Clerk

Bryan Robbins and Marvin Feiges,

Coca-Cola Company,

14-50538

Matthew F. Leitman

April 28, 2014

Bernard A. Friedman

April 28, 2014 s/ S Schoenherr

s/Matthew F. Leitman

Matthew F. Leitman

Case 2:14-mc-50538-AC-DRG ECF No. 2, PageID.163 Filed 04/28/14 Page 1 of 1
Argued and submitted December 13, 1995,

affirmed in part; reversed and remanded for reconsideration in part January 24, 1996

#### In the Matter of the Compensation of Benjamin G. Santos, Claimant. Benjamin G. SANTOS, *Petitioner, v.*CARYALL TRANSPORT and SAIF Corporation, *Respondents.*

(WCB 93-11469; CA A86201)

909 P2d 903

Donald M. Hooton argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Schneider, Hooton.

Michael O. Whitty, Special Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed as to rating of impairment; reversed and remanded for reconsideration of temporary disability award. *Volk v. America West Airlines,*135 Or App 565, 899 P2d 746 (1995).
§ 169.608 Non-integral keel cooler installations. ( a ) Hull penetrations for non-integral keel cooler installations must be made through a cofferdam or at a sea chest.
( b ) Non-integral keel coolers must be suitably protected against damage from debris and grounding by recessing the unit into the hull or by the placement of protective guards.
( c ) Each non-integral keel cooler hull penetration must be equipped with a shutoff valve.
[CGD 83-005, 51 FR 896, Jan. 9, 1986, as amended by USCG-2000-7790, 65 FR 58464, Sept. 29, 2000]
MIE 1 

Revised 09/18

Order of the Court to Continue Supervision 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

for the 

Eastern District of Michigan 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

 DARRICK ADAMS Crim. No.: 15CR20106-002 

On 07/22/2021 the Court authorized the issuance of a supervised release warrant based upon a violation petition 

citing violations of supervision. The issues of the violations were heard in Court on 02/28/2022, and the Court 

made the following finding: 

CONTINUE SUPERVISED RELEASE AND DISCHARGE AS SCHEDULED WITH RESTITUTION 

OWING. 

In light of the supervised releasee's compliance with the Court-ordered conditions of supervision since the 

violation hearing on 02/28/2022, the probation department recommends that the Court dispose of the violation 

matter and continue supervision. 

Respectfully submitted, 

s/Sarah A. Reinkensmeyer

Senior United States Probation Officer 

ORDER OF THE COURT

Pursuant to the above, it is ordered that the pending violation matter be resolved and 

supervision in this case be continued. All conditions imposed at the time of 

sentencing, along with any subsequent modifications to those conditions, remain in 

effect. 

Dated this 1st Day of March, 2022. 

s/Matthew F. Leitman

Matthew F. Leitman 

United States District Judge 

Case 2:15-cr-20106-MFL-MKM ECF No. 894, PageID.4264 Filed 03/01/22 Page 1 of 1
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cr-20520 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

 

LAMONT M. SAPP, 

 

Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION 

FOR COMPASSIONATE RELEASE (ECF No. 81) 

 On September 14, 2020, the Court held a hearing on Defendant Lamont 

Sapp’s motion for compassionate release. (See Mot., ECF No. 81.) For the reasons 

stated on the record during the motion hearing, Sapp’s motion is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

       s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

Dated: September 14, 2020 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on September 14, 2020, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/ Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (810) 341-9764 

Case 2:14-cr-20520-MFL-RSW ECF No. 99 filed 09/14/20 PageID.743 Page 1 of 1
#### § 127.600 Applicability.

This subpart applies to OSVs of at least 6,000 GT ITC (500 GRT if GT ITC is not assigned).
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG, LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8) pertaining to the Incentive Stock Option Plan, 1995 Stock Incentive
Plan for Employees and Consultants Option Agreements, Amended and Restated 1996
Stock Plan, 1997 Stock Plan and 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option Plan,
Stock Option Agreement and Warrant Agreement of Delta Internet Services, Inc.
and in the related Prospectuses, of Concentric Network Corporation of our
report dated January 25, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule of Concentric Network Corporation
included in this annual report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
1998.
 
                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
San Jose, California
January 25, 1999
2:14-cr-20568-VAR-RSW Doc # 7 Filed 05/29/13 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 17
2:14-cr-20568-VAR-RSW Doc # 7 Filed 05/29/13 Pg 2 of 5 Pg ID 18
2:14-cr-20568-VAR-RSW Doc # 7 Filed 05/29/13 Pg 3 of 5 Pg ID 19
2:14-cr-20568-VAR-RSW Doc # 7 Filed 05/29/13 Pg 4 of 5 Pg ID 20
2:14-cr-20568-VAR-RSW Doc # 7 Filed 05/29/13 Pg 5 of 5 Pg ID 21
# C_2013038EN.01002003.xml

| 9.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2012 — Natura Selection v OHIM — Ménard (natura)

(Case T-461/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark natura - Prior Community word mark NATURA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 38/35

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Natura Selection, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: E. Sugrañes Coca, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. García Murillo and D. Botis, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Ernest Ménard SA (Bourseul, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 June 2011 (Case R 2454/2010-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Ernest Ménard SA and Natura Selection, SL.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Natura Selection, SL to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Natura Selection, SL to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 340, 19.11.2011.

1

---
#### § 112.35-5 Manually started emergency systems.

Manually started emergency lighting and power systems must be activated by one manual operation, such as the manual operation of a switch from an “off” to an “on” position, to cause the emergency system to supply its connected loads.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.174-25 Production testing. ( a ) Thermal protective aid production testing is conducted under the procedures in this section and subpart 159.007 of this chapter.
( b ) One out of every 100 thermal protective aids produced must be given a complete visual examination. The sample must be selected at random from a production lot of 100 thermal protective aids and examined by or under the supervision of the independent laboratory. The sample fails if the visual examination shows that the aid does not conform to the approved design.
( c ) If a defect in the thermal protective aid is detected upon visual examination, 10 additional samples from the same lot must be selected at random and examined for the defect.
( d ) If one or more of the 10 samples fails the examination, each thermal protective aid in the lot must be examined for the defect for which the lot was rejected. Only thermal protective aids that are free of defects may be sold as Coast Guard approved.
[CGD 84-069b, 51 FR 19343, May 29, 1986; 51 FR 20650, June 6, 1986]
#### In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Peter M. Baum, *Executor, etc*.

Decree affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.