alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011269EN.01004903.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/49

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 13 July 2011 — Petroci v Council

(Case T-160/11 R)

(Interim measures - Common Foreign and Security Policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire - Freezing of funds - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No need to adjudicate in the main proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 269/110

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Société nationale d’opérations pétrolières de la Côte d’Ivoire Holding (Petroci Holding) (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) (represented by: M. Ceccaldi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and A. Vitro, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for interim measures seeking, under Article 278 TFEU, suspension of operation of (i) Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011 amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 36) and (ii) Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for interim measures.

| 2. | The Council of the European Union shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Council of the European Union shall pay the costs.

---
COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST FOR 8-HOUR OZONE RACT SIP SUBMITTAL

Planning Area: Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District

Title 40 CFR, Part 51, Appendix V –

Criteria for Determining the Completeness 

of Plan Submissions

Enclosed Notes

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS

2.1(a) Submittal Letter from Governor's 

Designee X See ARB Executive Order S-11-0012.

2.1(b) Evidence of Adoption X

See Northern Sierra Air Quality 

Management District Board Resolution 

2011-02 as certified by Board Clerk

2.1(c) Legal Authority Citation X See ARB Executive Order S-11-0012

2.1(d) Copy of :

a. Attainment Plan

b: Contingency Measures

Not applicable

2.1(e) Evidence of Compliance with State's 

Procedural Requirements X

See Northern Sierra Air Quality 

Management District Board Resolution 

2011-02 as certified by Board Clerk 

and ARB Executive Order S-11-0012

2.1(f) Evidence of Public Notice Consistent with 

40 CFR part 51.102 X See Attachments 

2.1(g) Certification of Public Hearing in 

Accordance with Notice X See Attachments

2.1(h) Compilation of Public Comments and 

Responses

There were no comments, see District 

cover letter.

2.2(a) Identification of Regulated Pollutant Not applicable.

2.2(b) Identification of Attainment Area/Status Not applicable.

2.2(c) Estimate of Plan's Impact on Emissions Not applicable.

2.2(d) Demonstration that Plan 

Approval/Implementation Protects 

NAAQS 

Not applicable.

2.2(e) Modeling Support Not applicable.

2.2(f)- Compliance/Enforcement and 

2.2(i) Justification Not applicable.
# C_2014292EN.01003001.xml

| 1.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2014 — Siemens v Commission

(Case T-223/11) (1)

1

((Arbitration clause - Contract for the loan of fissile material intended for the Joint Research Centre’s Ispra site - Non-performance of the contract - Default interest))

2014/C 292/35

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Siemens AG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: J. Risse, R. Harbst and H. Haller, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and W. Mölls, acting as Agents, and by R. Van der Hout and A. Krämer, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action based on an arbitration clause seeking an order for reimbursement by the Commission of all or part of the costs of reprocessing fissile material incurred by the applicant in the context of the performance of Contract No AG 2052 relating to the lending of fissile material intended for the Joint Research Centre site in Ispra (Italy), and for default interest.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Siemens AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Siemens AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 194, 2.7.2011.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.049-4 Construction and workmanship. ( a ) *General.* This specification covers buoyant cushions of the box type filled with unicellular plastic foam buoyant material. Such cushions consist essentially of a buoyant insert contained in an outer cover fitted with grab straps. The primary purpose of such cushions is to provide buoyancy to aid a person in keeping afloat in the water. Buoyant cushions providing less than 20 pounds buoyancy or less than 2 inches in thickness will not be acceptable.
( b ) *Cover.* One piece of material each for the top and bottom shall be stitched together to form the cover except that piecing of the cover material will be allowed provided it is for decorative purposes only. Gusset or boxing materials shall be of not more than two pieces. If more than one piece of material is used for the top, bottom, boxing or gusset, they shall be attached by a double row of stitching of the type shown in Federal Standard No. 751, for Seam types SSw-2 or LSb-2. The top and bottom may be of any of the materials permitted for the cover, but the boxing or gusset shall be a cotton fabric as specified by § 160.049-3(b)(1) or other equivalent material of a porous nature. Nonporous materials will not be permitted for the boxing or gusset, but coated upholstery cloth specified by § 160.049-3(c)(2), perforated to permit adequate draining and drying will be acceptable.
( c ) *Buoyant material.* A buoyant insert for a buoyant cushion must comply with the requirements in paragraph (c) (1) and (2) of this section and may be: ( 1 ) Molded in one piece; or
( 2 ) Built up from sheet material if it is formed from: ( i ) Three pieces or less in each layer, cemented together with an all-purpose vinyl adhesive such as or equivalent to U.S. Rubber No. M-6256 or Minnesota Mining No. EC-870 and No. EC-1070;
( ii ) Three layers or less that may be cemented; and
( iii ) Staggered butts and seams of adjacent layers.
( d ) *Grab Straps.* Grab straps shall be attached as shown on Dwg. No. 160,049-1 and shall finish 20 inches long and 1 inch wide at opposite ends. The grab straps, if formed from cover material shall be folded and stitched together so as to produce a double thickness with raw edges turned under. Other means will be given special consideration.
( e ) *Seams and stitching.* Seams shall be constructed with not less than a 3 ⁄ 8-inch border between the seam and the edge of the cover materials. All stitching shall be a lock stitch, 7 to 9 stitches per inch, except as follows: Chain stitching 6 to 8 stitches per inch with 20/4 thread on top and 40/3 thread on the bottom, will be acceptable in constructing grab straps.
( f ) *Workmanship.* All cushions shall be of first class workmanship and shall be free from defects materially affecting their appearance or serviceability. Cushions classified as “seconds” or “irregular” will not be acceptable under this specification.
[CGFR 65-37, 30 FR 11586, Sept. 10, 1965, as amended by CGD 72-163R, 38 FR 8119, Mar. 28, 1973]
#### William B. Fitch, *as Survivor, etc., Respondent, v.*William J. Best, *Appellant, Impleaded, etc*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Rumsey, J.
Exhibit
4.1


 


SHARE
CERTIFICATE


 


	Number of certificate	 	Number of shares
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 







 


ALE
GROUP HOLDING LIMITED


 


COMPANY
NUMBER [NUMBER]


 


This
is to certify that [Name] of [Address] is the registered holder of [Number] [Share Class] shares of [Value] each being [partly
paid to the extent of [amount in words] [amount in numerals] per share]]/[fully paid][and numbered [number]] in the above-named
company, subject to the memorandum and articles of association of the company.


 


[Transfer
date]


 


	 	 	 
	Director	 	 Director/Secretary
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MICHAEL KELSCH, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

FRANKLIN COLLECTION SERVICE 

INC., 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 2:14-cv-14228 

Hon. Judge Victoria A. Roberts 

Mag. Judge Michael J. Hluchaniuk 

STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

 Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 

Plaintiff Michael Kelsch and Defendant Franklin Collection Service Inc., through 

their undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree, that the above-captioned action be 

dismissed with prejudice. The parties further agree that each side shall bear their 

own attorney’s fees and costs. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 S/Victoria A. Roberts 

 United States District Judge 

January 14, 2015

Case 2:14-cv-14228-VAR-MJH ECF No. 7 filed 01/14/15 PageID.34 Page 1 of 2
Stipulated and Agreed: January 9, 2015 

/s/ Gary D. Nitzkin (w/consent) /s/ Charity A. Olson 

Gary D. Nitzkin (P41155) Charity A. Olson (P68295) 

Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant 

Michigan Consumer Credit Lawyers Olson Law Group 

22142 W. Nine Mile Rd. 2723 S. State Street, Suite 150 

Southfield, MI 48033 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 

(248) 353-2882 (734) 222-5179 

gary@micreditlawyer.com colson@olsonlawpc.com 

Case 2:14-cv-14228-VAR-MJH ECF No. 7 filed 01/14/15 PageID.35 Page 2 of 2
18210 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 11, 2007 / Notices 

Requests should contain individual’s 

full name, Social Security Number 

(SSN), current address, and telephone 

number. 

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES: 

DIA’s rules for accessing records, for 

contesting contents and appealing 

initial agency determinations are 

published in DIA Regulation 12–12 

‘‘Defense Intelligence Agency Privacy 

Program’’; 32 CFR part 319—Defense 

Intelligence Agency Privacy Program; or 

may be obtained from the system 

manager. 

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: 

From subject individuals and DIA’s 

security files and Human Resources 

Management System. 

EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM: 

None. 

[FR Doc. 07–1791 Filed 4–10–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[DoD–2007–OS–0033] 

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed 

Forces Proposed Rules Changes 

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Changes to 

the Rules of Practice and Procedure of 

the United States Court of Appeals for 

the Armed Forces. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

following proposed changes to Rule 24 

of the Rules of Practice and Procedure, 

United States Court of Appeals for the 

Armed Forces for public notice and 

comment. New language is in bold 

print. Language to be deleted is marked 

by a strikethrough. 

DATES: Comments on the proposed 

changes must be received by May 2007. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by docket number and or RIN 

number and title, by any of the 

fallowing methods: 

Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Following the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Mail: Federal Docket Management 

System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon, 

Washington, DC 20301–1160. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name and 

docket number of Regulatory 

Information Number (RIN) for the 

Federal Register document. The general 

policy for comments and other 

submissions available for public 

viewing on the Internet at http:// 

regulations.gov as they are received 

without change, including personal 

identifiers or contact information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

William A. DeCicco, Clerk of the Court, 

telephone (202) 761–1448, ext. 600. 

Dated: April 5, 2007. 

L.M. Bynum, 

Alternate OSD Federal Liaison Officer, DoD. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 11, 2007 / Notices 18211 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with NOTICESEN11AP07.003</GPH>
18212 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 11, 2007 / Notices 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with NOTICESEN11AP07.004</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 11, 2007 / Notices 18213 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with NOTICESEN11AP07.005</GPH>
18214 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 11, 2007 / Notices 

[FR Doc. 07–1789 Filed 4–10–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with NOTICESEN11AP07.006</GPH>
###### Editorial Note on Part 148

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59783, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 148.30 Records of special permits issued.

A list of all special permits issued, and copies of each, are available from the Commandant (CG-ENG-5).
EXHIBIT  32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
Pursuant  to  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned  officers  of Network Installation Corporation, a Nevada corporation
(the  "Company"),  does  hereby  certify,  to  such  officer's  knowledge, that:
The  Quarterly Report for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the "Form 10-QSB") of
the  Company  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form
10-QSB  fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and
results  of  operations  of  the  Company.


/s/  Michael  Cummings
--------------------------------------
Michael  Cummings
Chief  Executive  Officer
Dated:  August  23,  2004

/s/  Michael  Novielli
--------------------------------------
Michael  Novielli
Interim  Chief  Financial  Officer  and  Controller
Dated:  August  23,  2004
1 District Judge for the Eastern District of Louisiana,

sitting by designation.

 

2 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-10853

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent-Appellee,

versus

ALONZO RICHARD,

Petitioner-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:94-CV-1531-H

- - - - - - - - - -

August 16, 1996

Before DAVIS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges, and FALLON,1 District

Judge.

PER CURIAM:2

Alonzo Richard has filed a motion to proceed in forma

pauperis on appeal of the district court’s denial of his motion

to vacate, correct, or set aside his sentence under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255. Richard's affidavit filed in support of his IFP

application is sufficient to demonstrate that he is economically
 

3 Richard has also filed a “Motion for Determination of

Status” alleging for the first time that the indictment was

fatally defective. Richard has not shown plain error as the

indictment refers to and tracks the language of the statute that

Richard was convicted of violating. See United States v.

Armstrong, 951 F.2d 626, 628 (5th Cir. 1992); Douglass v. United

Serv. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996)(en banc). 

Richard’s motion is DENIED. 

eligible to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Because Richard

raises arguable points on appeal, we grant his in forma pauperis

application.

Richard contends that his trial counsel was ineffective in

that he conceded Richard’s guilt on two counts in his closing

argument. It was a reasonable trial strategy for counsel to

concede Richard’s guilt on the counts for which the evidence of

his guilt was overwhelming in order to successfully challenge the

other charges. United States v. Wilks, 46 F.3d 640, 641 (7th

Cir. 1995); United States v. Tabares, 951 F.2d 405, 409 (1st Cir.

1991).

Richard also contends that his counsel was ineffective for

failing to object to the trial court’s jury instruction

concerning the elements of 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a). The record

indicates that the trial court’s instruction tracked the language

of the statute and the indictment. Richard’s counsel was not

ineffective for failing to raise a meritless claim. Mendiola v.

Estelle, 635 F.2d 487, 491 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981).3

For the reasons stated above, the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
§ 139.145 Suspension of approval. ( a ) The Coast Guard may suspend the approval of a TPO approved under this part whenever the Coast Guard determines that the TPO does not comply with the provisions of this part. The Coast Guard must: ( 1 ) Notify the TPO in writing of the intention to suspend the approval;
( 2 ) Provide the details of the TPO's failure to comply with this part; and
( 3 ) Advise the TPO of the time period, not to exceed 60 days, within which the TPO must correct its failure to comply with this part. If the TPO fails to correct its failure to comply with this part within the time period allowed, the approval will be suspended.
( b ) The Coast Guard may also partially suspend the approval of a TPO, using the process described in paragraph (a) of this section. This may include suspension of an individual auditor or surveyor or suspension of the authority of the TPO to carry out specific duties whenever the Coast Guard determines that the provisions of this part are not complied with.
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.1831 Persons in charge of transferring liquid cargo in bulk or preparing cargo tanks. ( a ) The owner and operator of the vessel, and his or her agent, and each of them, shall ensure that— ( 1 ) Enough “Tankerman-PICs” or restricted “Tankerman-PICs”, and “Tankerman-Assistants”, authorized for the classification of cargo carried, are on duty to safely conduct a transfer of liquid cargo in bulk or a cool-down, warm-up, gas-free, or air-out of each cargo tank;
( 2 ) Each transfer of liquid cargo in bulk, and each cool-down, warm-up, gas-free, or air-out of a cargo tank, is supervised by a person designated as a person in charge of the transfer that possesses the qualifications required by 33 CFR 155.710;
( 3 ) On each foreign tankship, the person in charge of either a transfer of liquid cargo in bulk or a cool-down, warm-up, gas-free, or air-out of a cargo tank possesses the qualifications required by 33 CFR 155.710;
( 4 ) When cargo regulated under this part is being transferred, the person in charge of the transfer has received special training in the particular hazards associated with the cargo and in all special procedures for its handling; and
( 5 ) On each foreign vessel, the person in charge understands his or her responsibilities as described in this subchapter.
( b ) Upon request by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, in whose zone the transfer will take place, the owner and operator of the vessel, and his or her agent, and each of them, shall provide documentary evidence that the person in charge has received the training specified by paragraph (a)(4) of this section and is capable of competently performing the procedures necessary for the cargo.
[CGD 79-116, 60 FR 17158, Apr. 4, 1995]
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Loral
Space & Communications Ltd. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Richard J. Townsend,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |                                                         
| | --------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ RICHARD J. TOWNSEND                                 
| |                                                         
| | Richard J. Townsend                                     
| | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
    Officer

March 15, 2004
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 55 (Thursday, March 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13556-13557]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1392]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Veterans' Disability Benefits Commission, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Veterans' 
Disability Benefits Commission has scheduled a meeting for April 19-20, 
2007 in the Almas Temple, adjacent to the Hamilton Crowne Plaza Hotel, 
at 1315 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. The meeting will begin at 
8:30 a.m. and end at 5 p.m. each day. The meeting is open to the 
public.
    The purpose of the Commission is to carry out a study of the 
benefits under the laws of the United States that are provided to 
compensate and assist veterans and their survivors for disabilities and 
deaths attributable to military service.
    The agenda for the meeting will feature updates on the progress of 
the studies being conducted by the Center for Naval Analyses (CNA) and 
the Institute of Medicine (IOM). The Commission will receive 
presentations on CNA's preliminary survey results and several draft 
Issue Papers in various stages of development. There will be additional 
discussions with CNA on the topic of earned income, employment and 
compensation. The Commission will also receive comments from interested 
parties on the research topics approved for study and analysis by the 
Commission on October 14, 2005, and posted on the Commission's Web site 
during March 2007 for public comment.
    Interested persons may attend and present oral statements to the 
Commission on April 19. Oral presentations will be limited to five

[[Page 13557]]

minutes or less, depending on the number of participants. Interested 
parties may also provide written comments for review by the Commission 
prior to the meeting or at any time by e-mail to 
[email protected] or by mail to Mr. Ray Wilburn, Executive 
Director, Veterans' Disability Benefits Commission, 1101 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20004.

    Dated: March 14, 2007.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-1392 Filed 3-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
```
#### § 176.1 Preemptive effect.

The regulations in this part have preemptive effect over State or local regulations in the same field.

[USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33890, June 7, 2012]