Your web browser is not supported You're using Internet Explorer, some features might not work. Please switch to another browser like Chrome, Firefox, or Edge for a better experience.


An official website of the United States government Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Federal Election Commission | United States of America Calendar
           Glossary
          Search
              Search


Menu
      Home
      Campaign finance data
        All data
            Raising
            Spending
            Loans and debts
            Filings and reports
            Candidates
            Committees
            Bulk data
            Campaign finance statistics
        Find elections. Search by state or ZIP code
          Look up contributions from specific individuals
      Help for candidates and committees
        All compliance resources
            Guides
            Forms
            Dates and deadlines
            Trainings
        Learn about electronic filing
          Find and contact your committee's analyst
      Legal resources
        All legal resources
            Advisory opinions
            Enforcement
            Statutes
            Legislation
            Regulations
            Court cases
            Policy and other guidance
        Search across all legal resources
          Search guidance documents
      About
        All about the FEC
            News and announcements
            Commission meetings
            Mission and history
            Leadership and structure
            Reports about the FEC
            Careers
            Working with the FEC
            Contact
        Introduction to campaign finance and elections


- Home
- ›
      FEC Record: Litigation
- ›
      Wagner et. al., v. FEC (District court November 2012)

FEC Record: Litigation*Wagner, et. al., v. FEC* (District court November 2012)November 14, 2012 On November 2, 2012, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia upheld the Federal Election Campaign Act’s (the Act’s) long-standing prohibition on federal contractors making contributions in connection with federal elections and granted the
    Commission’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiffs had challenged the prohibition as violating both the First Amendment and the equal-protection guarantee in the Fifth Amendment. The court rejected both arguments in its decision. Background The Act prohibits federal government contractors from making contributions, either directly or indirectly, to any political party, committee or candidate for public office, or to any person for any political purpose or use. 2 U.S.C. §441c. Plaintiffs
    Wendy E. Wagner, Lawrence M.E. Brown and Jan W. Miller are individuals each with federal contracts for personal services. So long as they remain under contract with the federal government, Section 441c prohibits them from making contributions to candidates,
    parties or other political committees. The plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction in January 2012, which the court denied on April 16, 2012. Following that decision, both the plaintiffs and the Commission filed motions for summary judgment. Court decision First amendment.The plaintiffs alleged that Section 441c’s ban on contributions by federal contractors is not justified by a sufficiently important governmental interest, and that there is a lack of evidence that contractor contributions lead
    to corruption. The court rejected both of those arguments, concluding that the ban is closely drawn to the government’s interest in preventing actual and apparent corruption, and noting that Congress enacted the ban in 1940 following a scandal that involved federal
    contractors and quid pro quo corruption. The court also cited scandals in states that permit contributions from contractors, concluding that “their experiences substantiate the corruption worries that attend contributions by government contractors.” The plaintiffs also argued that the ban is both over-inclusive and under-inclusive because it covers contributions made by all federal contractors, but not others who received federal grants, loans or guarantees, or who seek government political positions
    such as ambassadorships. The court rejected those arguments, concluding that the decision to prohibit contributions from all federal contractors, but to exclude others from the ban is the prerogative of Congress. Equal protection.The plaintiffs challenged Section 441c as violating the equal-protection guarantee in the Fifth Amendment because they claimed that they were similarly situated to several groups that can make such contributions. Plaintiffs noted
    that while individual contractors cannot make contributions, corporate contractors are free to establish a federal political action committee (also known as a separate segregated fund, or SSF) for the purpose of making contributions. The plaintiffs
    also noted that employees, officers and shareholders of corporate contractors could make contributions using their personal funds. Finally, the plaintiffs argued that they are held to a different standard than that of federal employees, many of whom
    may make contributions to candidates and parties. The court held that individual contractors are not similarly situated under the law to corporate contractors’ PACs or their officials, who are legally distinct from the corporation. The court also rejected the comparison to federal employees, noting that
    it is not clear that contractors are more restricted than federal employees, and that in any event, “[t]he dissimilar roles of contractors and employees...justify the distinct regulatory schemes the Government has fashioned.” The court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and granted the Commission’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiffs have appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Resources:  Wagner v. FEC litigation page
 Author
          Myles MartinIcon of email being sentPublic Affairs Specialist


Read next: Stop This Insanity Inc., et al. v. FEC (District court ruling)
 Related: Explore campaign finance data »


This information is not intended to replace the law or to change its meaning, nor does this information create or confer any rights for or on any person or bind the Federal Election Commission or the public. The reader is encouraged also to consult the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (52 U.S.C. 30101 et seq.), Commission regulations (Title 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations), Commission advisory opinions and applicable court decisions.


About
          Careers
          Press
          Contact
   Privacy and security policy
          Plain language
          No FEAR Act
          Strategy, budget and performance
 Open government
          Protected Voices
          USA.gov
          Inspector General
          FOIA
 OpenFEC API
          GitHub repository
          Release notes
          FEC.gov status


Federal Election Commission
 The FEC's Twitter page
            The FEC's YouTube page Sign up for FECMail


Hide glossary Glossary Search terms