alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

EX-11
          2
             STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

ICY SPLASH FOOD AND BEVERAGE, INC.

STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
              (UNAUDITED)

THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,                            2001             2000
                                                    -----------      -----------

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Net loss                                            $   (19,649)     $   (27,199)
                                                    -----------      -----------

Weighted average shares outstanding                   6,600,000        6,600,000
                                                    -----------      -----------

Basic earnings per share
                                                    $      --        $      --
                                                    ===========      ===========
Diluted earnings per share:

Net loss                                            $   (19,649)     $   (27,199)
                                                    -----------      -----------

Weighted average and dilutive shares:
    Weighted average shares outstanding               6,600,000        6,600,000
    Dilutive shares (Antidilutive in 2001 & 2000)          --               --
                                                    -----------      -----------
                                                      6,600,000        7,550,000
                                                    -----------      -----------

Diluted earnings per share                          $      --        $      --
                                                    ===========      ===========

                                        10
```
Editorial Note on Part 161
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 161 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49238, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 161.002-10 Fire detection system control unit. ( a ) *General.* The fire detection system control unit must meet the requirements of § 111.01-9 of this chapter.
( b ) *Electrical supervision* —*Circuits.* The circuits must comply with Chapter 23 of NFPA 72 (incorporated by reference, see § 161.002-1), and must be Class A or Class X pathway.
[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48276, July 22, 2016]
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.151-35 Servicing. ( a ) *Inspection and repair.* Inflatable liferafts carried under the regulations in this chapter, and in chapter I of title 33 CFR, must be inspected periodically by a servicing facility approved by the Coast Guard, repaired as necessary, and repacked. Requirements for periodic inspection and repair of liferafts approved by the Coast Guard appear in §§ 160.151-37 through 160.151-57.
( b ) *Manufacturer's requirements.* To retain Coast Guard approval of liferafts, the manufacturer must: ( 1 ) Prepare a servicing manual or manuals complying with § 160.151-37 to cover each model and size of liferaft that the manufacturer produces. The manual or manuals must be submitted to the Commandant for approval.
( 2 ) At least once each year, issue a list of revisions to the manual or manuals, and issue a list of bulletins affecting the manual or manuals, that are in effect.
( 3 ) Make available to each servicing facility approved by the Coast Guard the manual or manuals, the revisions, the bulletins, the plans, and any unique parts and tools that may be necessary to service the liferaft. The plans may be either the manufacturing drawings, or special plans prepared especially for use by servicing technicians. They may be incorporated into the manual or manuals.
( 4 ) Have a training program complying with § 160.151-39 for the certification of servicing technicians.
( 5 ) Notify the OCMI for the zone in which the servicing facility is located whenever the manufacturer becomes aware of servicing at approved facilities that is not in accordance with the requirements of this subpart, or aware of falsification by an approved facility of records required by this subpart.
( c ) A manufacturer of liferafts not approved by the Coast Guard may establish servicing facilities approved by the Coast Guard for such liferafts in the United States if the manufacturer meets the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

VERSATA SOFTWARE, INC. et al., 

 Plaintiffs, Case No. 15-cv-10628 

 (consolidated with Case No. 15-11624) 

v. Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER (1) GRANTING VERSATA’S MOTION TO SEAL THE 

COURTROOM (ECF No. 942) AND (2) TERMINATING VERSATA’S 

MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION (ECF No. 920) 

On October 4, 2022, the Court heard argument on (1) Versata’s motion to seal 

the courtroom (ECF No. 942) and (2) Versata’s motion for clarification (ECF No. 

920). For the reasons explained on the record, the motions are resolved as follows: 

 Versata’s motion to seal the courtroom (ECF No. 942) is GRANTED on the 

narrowest grounds possible, for the least amount of time possible. More 

specifically, the Court will seal the courtroom only when the technical details 

of the alleged combination trade secrets are being discussed by witnesses Seth 

Krauss, Dr. Sam Malek, and Monty Myers. If Versata believes that the 

courtroom needs to be sealed during the testimony of any other witness, it may 

make an offer of proof for why the courtroom needs to be sealed at that time. 

Case 2:15-cv-10628-MFL-EAS ECF No. 951, PageID.61626 Filed 10/05/22 Page 1 of 2
2 

 During the hearing, Versata orally withdrew its motion for clarification (ECF 

No. 920). Based on Versata’s withdrawal of the motion, the Court 

TERMINATES the motion. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

Dated: October 5, 2022 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on October 5, 2022, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Ryan 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5126 

Case 2:15-cv-10628-MFL-EAS ECF No. 951, PageID.61627 Filed 10/05/22 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 72 (Monday, April 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1850]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, ``Stimulus Control in Mental 
Retardation''.
    Date: April 27, 2007.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Watergate, 2650 Virginia Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20037.
    Contact Person: Marita R. Hopmann, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health, and Human Development, 6100 Building, Room 5B01, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6911, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6e06011e030f0000032e030f07024000070640090118"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a2cacdd2cfc3cccccfe2cfc3cbce8ccccbca8cc5cdd4">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 5, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1850 Filed 4-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 169.825 Wearing of safety belts.

The master of each vessel shall ensure that each person wears an approved safety harness when aloft or working topside in heavy weather.
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-135402on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-158376 on Form S-3 of ourreports dated April 15, 2010, relating to the consolidated financialstatements of First Federal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc., and theeffectiveness of First Federal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc.’s internalcontrol over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof First Federal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc. for the year ended December 31,2009.

 

 
| /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP |
|------------------------------------|
| Little Rock, AR                    |
| April 15, 2010                |

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

RODNEY KING, 

 Petitioner, Case No. 14-cv-14627 

 Honorable Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

J.A. Terris, 

 Respondent. 

____________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION 

TO AMEND HIS HABEAS CORPUS PETITION 

Petitioner Rodney King (“Petitioner”) has filed a pro se petition for the writ of 

habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and a motion to amend the petition. The habeas 

petition and exhibits indicate that, following a jury trial in the United States District 

Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Petitioner was convicted of (1) possession with 

intent to distribute crack cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B), 

and (2) felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The trial 

court sentenced Petitioner as an armed career criminal1

 to two concurrent terms of 264 

months (twenty-two years) in prison and four years of supervised release. Petitioner 

alleges in his habeas petition that his sentence was improperly enhanced on the basis of 

two Ohio convictions for armed robbery and a Federal Youth Act conviction for bank 

                                                            

1

 Under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), “an individual who 

violates § 922(g)(1) and has three previous convictions for a violent felony is subject to a 

mandatory minimum penalty of 15 years imprisonment.” United States v. Welch, __ F.3d __, __, 

No. 13-4386, 2014 WL 6844935, at *1 (6th Cir. Dec. 5, 2014). 

2:14-cv-14627-MFL-PTM Doc # 8 Filed 01/14/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 180
robbery. In his motion to amend, Petitioner seeks permission to amend his habeas 

petition by attaching two excerpts from the Ohio Criminal Code, specifically Revised 

Code (R.C.) 2923.14 (“Relief from Disability”) and R.C. 2967.16 (“Final Release of 

Paroled Prisoners”). 

Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 

A party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course within: 

(A) 21 days after serving it, or 

(B) if the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required, 21 

days after service of a responsive pleading or 21 days after service of 

a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f), whichever is earlier. 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1). 

On January 12, 2015, the Court ordered respondent J.A. Terris to file a response to 

Petitioner’s habeas corpus petition. Respondent has not filed his responsive pleading as 

of today’s date. Therefore, under Rule 15(a)(1)(B), Petitioner is entitled to amend his 

pleading as a matter of course. Accordingly, his motion to amend his habeas petition to 

add two exhibits (ECF No. 4) is GRANTED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: January 14, 2015 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or 

counsel of record on January 14, 2015, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113 

2:14-cv-14627-MFL-PTM Doc # 8 Filed 01/14/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 181
§ 176.600 Drydock and internal structural examination intervals. ( a ) The owner or managing operator shall make a vessel available for drydock examinations, internal structural examinations, and underwater surveys (UWILD) required by this section.
( b ) If your vessel is operated on international voyages subject to SOLAS requirements, it must undergo a drydock examination once every 12 months unless it has been approved to undergo an underwater survey (UWILD) per § 176.615 of this part. If the vessel becomes due for a drydock examination or an internal structural examination during the voyage, it may lawfully complete the voyage prior to the examination if it undergoes the required examination upon completion of the voyage to the United States but not later than 30 days after the examination was due. If the vessel is due for an examination within 15 days of sailing on an international voyage from the United States port, it must undergo the required examination before sailing.
( c ) If your vessel is not operated on international voyages and does not meet the conditions in paragraph (d) of this section, it must undergo a drydock and internal structural examination as follows unless it has been approved to undergo an underwater survey (UWILD) per § 176.615 of this part: ( 1 ) A vessel that is exposed to salt water more than three months in any 12 month period since the last examination must undergo a drydock examination and an internal structural at least once every two years; and
( 2 ) A vessel that is exposed to salt water not more than three months in any 12 month period since the last examination must undergo a drydock examination and an internal structural examination at least once every five years.
( d ) Whenever damage or deterioration to hull plating or structural members that may affect the seaworthiness of a vessel is discovered or suspected, the cognizant OCMI may conduct an internal structural examination in any affected space including fuel tanks, and may require the vessel to be drydocked or taken out of service to assess the extent of the damage, and to effect permanent repairs. The OCMI may also decrease the drydock examination intervals to monitor the vessel's structural condition.
( e ) For a vessel that is eligible per § 115.625, and if the owner opts for an alternate hull examination with the underwater survey portion conducted exclusively by divers, the vessel must undergo two alternate hull exams and two internal structural exams within any five-year period. If a vessel completes a satisfactory alternate hull exam, with the underwater survey portion conducted predominantly by an approved underwater remotely operated vehicle (ROV), the vessel must undergo one alternate hull and one internal structural exam, within any five-year period. The vessel may undergo a drydock exam to satisfy any of the required alternate hull exams.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 953, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51356, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2000-6858, 67 FR 21084, Apr. 29, 2002]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 69 (Wednesday, April 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 18272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1804]



[[Page 18272]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service


Notice of Availability of the Proposed Notice of Sale for Outer 
Continental Shelf (OCS) Oil and Gas Lease Sale 204 in the Western Gulf 
of Mexico (GOM)

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability of the proposed Notice of Sale for 
proposed Sale 204.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The MMS announces the availability of the proposed Notice of 
Sale for proposed Sale 204 in the Western GOM OCS. This Notice is 
published pursuant to 30 CFR 256.29(c) as a matter of information to 
the public. With regard to oil and gas leasing on the OCS, the 
Secretary of the Interior, pursuant to section 19 of the OCS Lands Act, 
provides the affected States the opportunity to review the proposed 
Notice. The proposed Notice sets forth the proposed terms and 
conditions of the sale, including minimum bids, royalty rates, and 
rentals.

DATES: Comments on the size, timing, or location of proposed Sale 204 
are due from the affected States within 60 days following their receipt 
of the proposed Notice. The final Notice of Sale will be published in 
the Federal Register at least 30 days prior to the date of bid opening. 
Bid opening is currently scheduled for August 22, 2007.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed Notice of Sale for Sale 204 and 
a ``Proposed Sale Notice Package'' containing information essential to 
potential bidders may be obtained from the Public Information Unit, 
Gulf of Mexico Region, Minerals Management Service, 1201 Elmwood Park 
Boulevard, New Orleans, Louisiana 70123-2394. Telephone: (504) 736-
2519.

    Dated: April 6, 2007.
R. M. ``Johnnie'' Burton,
Director, Minerals Management Service.
[FR Doc. 07-1804 Filed 4-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-M
§ 167.40-1 Electrical installations. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided by law or regulation in this part, the electrical equipment may be considered acceptable if it complies with the requirements covered by any one of the following: ( 1 ) U.S. Navy Standard Construction Specifications currently in effect.
( 2 ) U. S. Coast Guard electrical engineering requirements in Subchapter J (Electrical Engineering) of this chapter.
( 3 ) Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) Standard No. 45, 1945 or 1948 Revision. These standards may be purchased from the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Inc. (IEEE), IEEE Service Center, 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08855.
( b ) Changes or alterations in the electrical installations of vessels now in service shall be in accordance with standards set forth in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Special attention shall be given by the inspectors in the examination of present installation to see that it is of such nature as to preclude any danger of fire, giving particular attention to wiring which is carried through wooden bulkheads, partitions, etc.
[CGFR 51-11, 16 FR 3218, Apr. 12, 1951, as amended by CGFR 52-43, 17 FR 9543, Oct. 18, 1952; USCG-1999-6216, 64 FR 53228, Oct. 1, 1999]
AFS-10-259-E 

Jul 02 2010 

 Exemption No. 9752A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2007-27018 

Mr. Michael B. Rahm 

Director of Operations 

NJI, Inc. 

108 Traders Cross, Suite 200 

Okatie, SC 29909 

Dear Mr. Rahm: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9752. 

It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions and 

limitations. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated April 27, 2010, and supplemental information dated May 26, 2010, you 

petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of NJI, Inc. (NJI), for an 

extension of Exemption No. 9752. That exemption from § 135.225(f) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows NJI to make instrument flight rules (IFR) takeoffs from 

foreign and military airports when the visibility is less than 1 statute mile or make an 

instrument approach when the visibility is less than 1⁄2 mile. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to NJI. 
2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9752 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Provisions of this exemption apply to Gulfstream IV, V, 450, and 550 aircraft only; 

2. Crews utilizing this exemption must have been trained and qualified to the 

standards specified under part 121, subparts N and O; and 

3. Airports at which NJI intends to utilize the provisions of this exemption must have 

had approach procedures developed in accordance with U.S. Terminal Instrument 

Procedures or International Civil Aviation Organization Procedure for Air 

Navigation Services-Aircraft Operations criteria. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9752 to September 30, 2012, 

unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 9752 remain the same. This letter must be 

attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 9752. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John W. McGraw 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
Order entered May 6, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01307-CR

JOHN FRANCIS KENNEDY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 069725

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s May 1, 2020 second motion to extend the 

time to file appellant’s brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s 

brief filed on or before May 8, 2020.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Kelly Hankinson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Thinkpath Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September
30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Thinkpath Inc.

Date:  November 19, 2007                    By: /s/ Kelly Hankinson
                                                -------------------
                                                Name:    Kelly Hankinson
                                                Title:   Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Thinkpath Inc. and will be retained by Thinkpath Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.