Your web browser is not supported You're using Internet Explorer, some features might not work. Please switch to another browser like Chrome, Firefox, or Edge for a better experience.


An official website of the United States government Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Federal Election Commission | United States of America Calendar
           Glossary
          Search
              Search


Menu
      Home
      Campaign finance data
        All data
            Raising
            Spending
            Loans and debts
            Filings and reports
            Candidates
            Committees
            Bulk data
            Campaign finance statistics
        Find elections. Search by state or ZIP code
          Look up contributions from specific individuals
      Help for candidates and committees
        All compliance resources
            Guides
            Forms
            Dates and deadlines
            Trainings
        Learn about electronic filing
          Find and contact your committee's analyst
      Legal resources
        All legal resources
            Advisory opinions
            Enforcement
            Statutes
            Legislation
            Regulations
            Court cases
            Policy and other guidance
        Search across all legal resources
          Search guidance documents
      About
        All about the FEC
            News and announcements
            Commission meetings
            Mission and history
            Leadership and structure
            Reports about the FEC
            Careers
            Working with the FEC
            Contact
        Introduction to campaign finance and elections


- Home
- ›
      FEC Record: Litigation
- ›
      Stop This Insanity Inc., et al. v. FEC (District court ruling)

FEC Record: Litigation*Stop This Insanity Inc., et al. v. FEC* (District court ruling)November 13, 2012 On November 5, 2012, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia denied a request for a preliminary injunction and dismissed a suit filed by Stop This Insanity, Inc. (STI), its separate segregated fund (SSF) and potential contributors. The suit challenged the Commission’s application of the Federal Election Campaign Act (the Act) in its response to STI’s advisory opinion request (AOR). Background In its AOR, STI asked if it could establish a non-contribution account associated with its existing SSF — Stop This Insanity, Inc. Employee Leadership Fund (the Leadership Fund). The Leadership Fund would solicit unlimited contributions for its non-contribution
    account from members of its restricted class, as well as other individuals, political committees, corporations and labor organizations. Those contributions would be used to fund independent expenditures. The Commission could not reach a majority response.
    See AOR 2012-01. STI, the Leadership Fund and a group of potential contributors challenged the Commission’s application of the limits on contributions to political committees, the individual biennial contribution limit, the ban on corporate contributions and the restrictions
    on SSF solicitations as an unconstitutional limit on their First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and association. See 2 U.S.C. §§ 441a(a)(1)(C), 441a(a)(3), 441b(a) and 441b(b)(4)(A)(i). The plaintiffs sought preliminary and permanent injunctive
    relief and a declaratory judgment. District court’s decision The court denied the plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction and granted the Commission’s motion to dismiss the case. Throughout its opinion, the court sought to distinguish STI’s claims from those in earlier cases, such as EMILY’s List and SpeechNow, which contributed to the development of the so-called hybrid nonconnected PACs the Leadership Fund sought to emulate. Among other things, the court noted that the Leadership Fund is an SSF, rather than a nonconnected PAC. Unlike a nonconnected PAC, an SSF may receive unlimited and undisclosed administrative support from its sponsoring corporation or labor organization.
    In exchange, the SSF must limit its solicitations to a restricted class of individuals associated with the connected organization. The court rejected STI’s challenge to that restriction, concluding that “SSFs are creatures of statute—they were crafted by Congress to enjoy certain benefits that other, non-connected PACs cannot enjoy, and it is therefore eminently reasonable and important
    for connected PACs to abide by Congress’s countervailing restriction on the universe of people to whom SSFs’ solicitations may be directed.” The court further explained that, “Granting the plaintiffs the relief they request would force the FEC to
    ignore the congressionally mandated limits on the fundraising activities of SSFs without a sound constitutional basis for doing so.” The court also questioned whether a hybrid PAC could effectively avoid the appearance of corruption that serves as a rationale for contribution limits: “When a single entity is allowed to make both limited direct contributions and unlimited independent
    expenditures, keeping the bank accounts for those two purposes separate is simply insufficient to overcome the appearance that the entity is in cahoots with the candidates and parties that it coordinates with and supports.” Accordingly, the court
    concluded that, “Insofar as the Leadership Fund chooses to remain as a single entity that engages in both direct candidate contributions and express advocacy communications, ... the Leadership Fund may not solicit contributions beyond the limits on
    such solicitations contained in 2 U.S.C. § 441b(b)(4) and ... also may not accept any contributions in excess of the limits contained in 2 U.S.C. §§ 441a(a)(1)(C) and 441a(a)(3).” Finally, the court rejected the plaintiffs’ argument that the statute’s restrictions would cause it irreparable harm, finding it “highly dubious in light of the numerous alternative ways that the plaintiffs could engage in unlimited political speech.” Resources:  Stop This Insanity memorandum opinion [PDF]
    Stop This Insanity litigation page
    AOR 2012-01
 Author
          Alex Knott


Read next: Herron for Congress v. FEC (District court)
 Related: Explore campaign finance data »


This information is not intended to replace the law or to change its meaning, nor does this information create or confer any rights for or on any person or bind the Federal Election Commission or the public. The reader is encouraged also to consult the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (52 U.S.C. 30101 et seq.), Commission regulations (Title 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations), Commission advisory opinions and applicable court decisions.


About
          Careers
          Press
          Contact
   Privacy and security policy
          Plain language
          No FEAR Act
          Strategy, budget and performance
 Open government
          Protected Voices
          USA.gov
          Inspector General
          FOIA
 OpenFEC API
          GitHub repository
          Release notes
          FEC.gov status


Federal Election Commission
 The FEC's Twitter page
            The FEC's YouTube page Sign up for FECMail


Hide glossary Glossary Search terms