alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2 

I, James Leslie Pilkington, CEO, certify that: 

1.              I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Secure Blue, Inc.; 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue          statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make          the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements          were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly          report; 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information          included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the          financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as          of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4.              I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and          procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the          registrant and we have: 

    a)                 designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure          controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that          material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others          within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this quarterly          report is being prepared; 

    b)                 evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness          of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered          by this report based on such evaluation; and 

    c)                 disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control          over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent          fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to          materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial          reporting; and 

5.              I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over          financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee          of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent          function): 

    a)                 all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation          of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to          adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and          report financial information; and 

    b)                 any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees          who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over          financial reporting. 

Date: December 15, 2003
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Amber Kloha Mansfield, 

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

Case No. 14-11766

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ARTHUR J. TARNOW

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

ELIZABETH A. STAFFORD

 /

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [21]

AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [16]; DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [19]; AND REMANDING CASE

TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER

PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THE R&R [21]

On April 17, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued an R&R [21] recommending

that the Court grant in part and deny in part Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment

[16], deny Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [19], and remand the case to

the social security commissioner for further proceedings. Neither party has filed any

objection to the R&R [21].

The Court having reviewed the record, the R&R [21] is hereby ADOPTED

and is entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court.1

 Accordingly,

1

 The Court adopts the R&R [21] save for the last sentence of the Standard of Review

section on page twenty-one, which appears to contain a typographical error contradicting the rest

of the analysis. The Court adopts the conclusion that the ALJ’s result was not supported by

substantial evidence, as explained throughout the R&R [21] and as succinctly stated on page

thirty-four of the R&R [21].

2:14-cv-11766-AJT-EAS Doc # 22 Filed 05/12/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1078
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [16] is

GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary

Judgment [19] is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the Social

Security Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the R&R [21].

SO ORDERED.

s/Arthur J. Tarnow

ARTHUR J. TARNOW

SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: May 12, 2015

2/2

2:14-cv-11766-AJT-EAS Doc # 22 Filed 05/12/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1079
###### Editorial Note on Part 160

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 160.135-3 Definitions.

In addition to the definitions in the IMO LSA Code (incorporated by reference, see § 160.135-5 of this subpart), in this subpart, the term:

*Commandant* means the Chief of the Lifesaving and Fire Safety Standards Division. Address: Commandant (CG-ENG-4), Attn: Lifesaving and Fire Safety Division, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509; telephone 202-372-1392 or fax 202-372-1924.

*Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic (FRP)* means a composite structural material formed by electrical-grade glass fibers in Coast Guard accepted catalyst activated resin.

*Full load* means the weight of the complete lifeboat including all required equipment, provisions, fuel, and the number of persons for which it is approved. This is also known as the “condition B” weight.

*Independent laboratory* has the same meaning as 46 CFR 159.001-3. A list of accepted independent laboratories is available from the Commandant and online at *http://cgmix.uscg.mil.*

*Light load* means the weight of the complete lifeboat empty and does not include fuel, required equipment, or the equivalent weight of persons. This is also known as the “condition A” weight.

*Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI)* means an officer of the Coast Guard designated as such by the Commandant and who fulfills the duties described in 46 CFR 1.01-15(b). The “cognizant OCMI” is the OCMI who has immediate jurisdiction over a vessel or geographic area for the purpose of performing the duties previously described.

*Positive Stability* means the condition of a lifeboat such that when it is displaced a small amount in any direction from upright, it returns on its own to the position before displacement.

*SOLAS* means the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as amended.

[USCG-2010-0048, 76 FR 62987, Oct. 11, 2011, as amended by USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60159, Sept. 30, 2013]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19547-19548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1897]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Cancellation of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of the cancellation of the National Library 
of Medicine Special Emphasis Panel, July 11, 2007, 8:30 a.m. to July 
11, 2007, 5 p.m., Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 
Military Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015 which was published in the 
Federal Register on March 28, 2007, 72 FR 14599.


[[Page 19548]]


    Dated: April 11, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1897 Filed 4-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09
- 14
- 00 247
- CR

____________________ EBONY LIVING, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_____________________________________ _____________________________ On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 293812

_____________________________________ _____________________________ ORDER After this Court issued its opinion , in which we dismissed the appeal as untimely, appellant Ebony Living filed a motion for re consideration . In the motion for reconsideration, Living argues that her attorney hand delivered a notice of appeal “to the C lerk of the County Court at Law No. 2 for filing[,]” but “[o]n or about May 23, 2014[,] it was discovered that the Notice of Appeal filed on April 8, 2014[,] was not processed by the trial court in a timely manner.” Living contends “[t]his was an oversight by all parties and was not intentionally and knowingly done.”2 The appellate record bef ore this Court is insufficient to establish that Living filed her notice of appeal on April 8, 2014. It is ORDERED that the trial court conduct a hearing to determine whether Living timely filed her notice of appeal

. For this purpose the trial court shall conduct such hearings as may be n ecessary, make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and prepare a record of the proceeding . The trial court may receive evidence in the form of affidavits made under penalty of p erjury or sworn testimony before the trial court at the hearing. The record of the hearing, including any orders and findings of the trial judge, as well as any affidavits or other exhibits received by the trial
court, shall be filed in the Court of Appeal s by August 25 , 2014

. ORDER ENTERED July 24 , 20 14

. PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT MICHIGAN

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, )

)

Plaintiff, ) Civil Case No. 2:15-cv-10285-LJM-DRG

) Honorable Laurie J. Michelson

v. ) Magistrate Judge David R. Grand

)

JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address )

69.136.133.109, )

)

Defendant. )

)

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Plaintiff, Malibu Media, LLC, by and through undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 26(c), hereby moves for entry of a Protective Order in the form attached hereto as 

Exhibit A and in support states:

1. For good cause shown, the district court may grant a protective order requiring 

that “a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information not 

be revealed or be revealed only in a specified way.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1)(G). 

2. On May 15, 2015, Plaintiff served its First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for 

Production on Defendant. Within its discovery requests, Plaintiff seeks forensically sound 

copies of Defendant’s hard drives and examination of same. Defendant intends on producing his 

computer devices, but only after entry of a protective order. 

3. The Parties have conferred and agreed on entry of a protective order. The parties 

stipulate and agree to the terms set forth in the Stipulate Protective Order For Production of Date 

on Defendant’s Computer Hard Drive in order to protect privileged and non-relevant information 

on the Defendant’s hard drives while allowing Plaintiff access to any relevant non-privileged 

2:15-cv-10285-LJM-DRG Doc # 10 Filed 06/03/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 66
information. See Stipulate Protective Order For Production of Date on Defendant’s Computer 

Hard Drive, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”. 

4. Accordingly, Plaintiff respectfully requests this Court enter a Protective Order in 

the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Malibu Media, LLC, respectfully requests this Court enter a 

Protective Order in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.

Dated: June 3, 2015

Respectfully submitted, 

NICOLETTI LAW, PLC 

By: /s/ Paul J. Nicoletti

Paul J. Nicoletti, Esq. (P-44419) 

33717 Woodward Ave, #433 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

Tel: (248) 203-7800 

E-Fax: (248) 928-7051 

Email: pauljnicoletti@gmail.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on June 3, 2015, I electronically filed the foregoing document with 

the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF and that service was perfected on all counsel of record and 

interested parties through this system. 

By: /s/ Paul J. Nicoletti

2:15-cv-10285-LJM-DRG Doc # 10 Filed 06/03/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 67
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RICHARD CROWELL,

Plaintiff,

 Case No. 15-10690 

v. District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow

 Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

BADAWI ABDELLATIF,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On February 23, 2015, Plaintiff Richard K. Cromwell (“Plaintiff”), a Michigan

Department of Corrections (“MDOC”) inmate currently housed at the Macomb Correctional

Facility, filed a pro se civil complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the

Court is Plaintiff’s motion for dismissal of Defendant Badawi Abdellatif (“Defendant”)

without prejudice [Doc. #31], which has been referred for a Report and Recommendation

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On August 27, 2015, Defendant filed a response,

stating that he had no objection to the motion to dismiss him without prejudice [Doc. #32]. 

Because Defendant does not object, I recommend that Plaintiff’s motion [Doc. #31] be

GRANTED, dismissing Defendant Badawi Abdellatif WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed within fourteen (14)

days of service of a copy hereof as provided for in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich. LR

-1-

2:15-cv-10690-AJT-RSW Doc # 33 Filed 10/06/15 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 422
72.1(d)(2). Failure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of

appeal. Thomas v Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985); Howard v

Secretary of HHS, 932 F.2d 505 (6 Cir. 1991); United States v Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6 Cir. th th

1981). Filing of objections which raise some issues but fail to raise others with specificity

will not preserve all the objections a party might have to this Report and Recommendation. 

Willis v Secretary of HHS, 931 F.2d 390, 401 (6 Cir. 1991); Smith v Detroit Fed’n of th

Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6 Cir. 1987). Pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR th

72.1(d)(2), a copy of any objections is to be served upon this Magistrate Judge.

Any objections must be labeled as “Objection #1,” “Objection #2,” etc.; any objection

must recite precisely the provision of this Report and Recommendation to which it pertains. 

Not later than fourteen (14) days after service of an objection, the opposing party must file a

concise response proportionate to the objections in length and complexity. The response must

specifically address each issue raised in the objections, in the same order and labeled ad

“Response to Objection #1,” “Response to Objection #2,” etc.

 s/R. Steven Whalen 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Dated: October 6, 2015

-2-

2:15-cv-10690-AJT-RSW Doc # 33 Filed 10/06/15 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 423
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on

October 6, 2015, electronically and/or by U.S. mail.

s/C. Ciesla 

Case Manager 

-3-

2:15-cv-10690-AJT-RSW Doc # 33 Filed 10/06/15 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 424
§ 119.458 Portable fuel systems. ( a ) Portable fuel systems, including portable tanks and related fuel lines and accessories, are prohibited except where used for portable dewatering pumps or outboard motor installations.
( b ) The design, construction and stowage of portable tanks and related fuel lines and accessories must meet the requirements of ABYC H-25, “Portable Gasoline Fuel Systems for Flammable Liquids,” or other standard specified by the Commandant.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 922, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51352, Sept. 30, 1997]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Declan French, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Thinkpath Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30,
2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Thinkpath Inc.


Date:  August 20, 2007                     By:  /s/ Declan French
                                                -----------------------
                                                Name:    Declan French
                                                Title:   Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Thinkpath Inc. and will be retained by Thinkpath Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2011340EN.01004102.xml

| 19.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/41

---

Action brought on 17 August 2011 — ZZ and Others v Parliament

(Case F-82/11)

2011/C 340/85

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ZZ and Others (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for a declaration that the elections to the Staff Committee of the Parliament, and the European Parliament’s failure to take action in respect of the various illegalities that affected the electoral process, is unlawful.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that the elections to the Staff Committee of the European Parliament which were held between 27 October and 24 November 2010 are unlawful; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the elections to the Staff Committee of the European Parliament which were held between 27 October and 24 November 2010 are unlawful;

| — | declare that the European Parliament’s failure to take action in respect of the various illegalities that affected the electoral process are unlawful; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the European Parliament’s failure to take action in respect of the various illegalities that affected the electoral process are unlawful;

| — | annul the implied decision of the Secretary General of the Parliament of 20 May 2011 rejecting the applicants’ complaint of 20 January 2011 requesting annulment of the results of the elections to the Staff Committee announced on 19 November 2010 and the results published on 23 and 24 November and 10 December 2010, and that fresh elections be held or at least a second round of voting; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the implied decision of the Secretary General of the Parliament of 20 May 2011 rejecting the applicants’ complaint of 20 January 2011 requesting annulment of the results of the elections to the Staff Committee announced on 19 November 2010 and the results published on 23 and 24 November and 10 December 2010, and that fresh elections be held or at least a second round of voting;

| — | order the Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Parliament to pay the costs.

---
Exhibit 32.2

                       CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, John Stephens, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, of Biofield
Corp. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December
     31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
     78o(d)); and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 30, 2004       By: /s/ John D. Stephens
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               John D. Stephens
                               Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
                               (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.171-7 Approval procedures. ( a ) *General.* An immersion suit is approved by the Coast Guard under the procedures in subpart 159.005 of this chapter.
( b ) *Approval testing.* Each approval test must be conducted in accordance with § 160.171-17 or § 160.171-19.
( c ) *Approval of child size and oversize adult suits.* No child size or oversize adult sized suit will be approved unless the adult size of the suit has been approved.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

                    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in                     *United States*                     v.                     *Jack and Chris Barnhill,*                     Case No. 4:07-cv-00994-RBH, was lodged with the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina on April 12, 2007. This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the United States against the Defendants pursuant to Section 301(a) of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. 1311(a), to obtain injunctive relief from and impose civil penalties against the Defendants for filling wetlands without a permit.                

                    The proposed Consent Decree resolves these allegations by requiring the Defendants to restore the impacted areas and to pay a civil penalty. The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of publication of this notice. Please address comments to Emery Clark, Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, Wachovia Building, Suite 500, 1441 Main Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201 and refer to                     *United States*                     v.                     *Jack and Chris Barnhill,*                     Case No. 4:07-cv-00994-RBH.                

The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, 901 Richland Lane, Columbia, South Carolina.

                    In addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be viewed on the World Wide Web at                     *http://www.usdoj.gov/​enrd/​open.html.*

Stephen Samuels,

Assistant Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 07-1995 Filed 4-20-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-15-M