alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 1
Federal Reserve Bank of: Boston

## Filings received during the week ending November 12, 2005

|Filer               | Filing Type | Filing Proposal                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | End of Comment Period                          
|------------------- | ----------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|BUTLER BANCORP, MHC | * 3A1* 3A3  | Application by Butler Bancorp, MHC and Butler Bancorp, Inc., both of Lowell, Massachusetts, to become a mutual bank holding company and a stock bank holding company, respectively, by acquiring Butler Bank, Lowell, Massachusetts, pursuant to section 3(a)(1) and section 3(a)(3) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. | Newspaper:10/15/2005Federal Register:10/14/2005
|Newspaper:          | 10/15/2005 
|Federal Register:   | 10/14/2005 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for     Quarter of

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------
|NONE       

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:
Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us
§ 189.35-1 Application. ( a ) The requirements of this subpart shall apply to all weight handling gear installed on oceanographic research vessels except weight handling gear designated to handle primary lifesaving equipment. Weight handling gear designated for this use shall meet the applicable portions of Subchapter I (Cargo and Miscellaneous Vessels) of this chapter.
( b ) Weight handling gear placed under the inspection and testing required for cargo gear by the classification society or cargo gear bureaus recognized in Subchapter I (Cargo and Miscellaneous Vessels) of this chapter may be considered as having met the intent of this subpart.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Plaintiff,

vs.

Case Number:

Honorable

Defendant.

/

STATEMENT OF DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS

AND FINANCIAL INTEREST

Pursuant to LR 83.4, makes the following disclosure:

[NOTE: A negative report, if appropriate, is required.]

1. Is said corporate party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation?

Yes No

If the answer is ''Yes'', list below the identity of the parent corporation or affiliate and

the relationship between it and the named party:

2. Is there a publicly owned corporation or its affiliate, not a party to the case, that has

a substantial financial interest in the outcome of the litigation?

Yes No

If the answer is ''Yes'', list the identity of such corporate or affiliate and the nature of

the financial interest:

Signature of Counsel Date

(Rev. 5-99)

4:14-cv-11649-LVP-PJK Doc # 2 Filed 04/28/14 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 12
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.049-3 Materials. ( a ) *General.* All components used in the construction of buoyant cushions must meet the applicable requirements of subpart 164.019.
( b ) *Unicellular plastic foam.* The unicellular plastic foam shall be all new material complying with the requirements of Specification subpart 164.015 for Type A or B foam.
( c ) *Cover.* Cotton fabrics and coated upholstery cloth meeting the minimum requirements set forth in paragraphs (c) (1) and (2) of this section, are acceptable for use as covers for buoyant cushions. Vinyl-dip coating meeting the requirements set forth in paragraph (c)(3) of this section will also be acceptable. Alternate materials will be given special consideration. Pro rata widths of like construction will be acceptable. ( 1 ) *Cotton fabrics.* Cotton fabrics shall comply with the requirements of Federal Specification CCC-C-426 for Type I, Class 3 material.
( 2 ) *Coated upholstery cloth.* Coated upholstery cloth shall comply with the requirements of Federal Specification CCC-A-700.
( 3 ) *Vinyl-dip.* The vinyl-dip coating shall comply with the coating requirements of § 160.055-5(b)(2) except there are no color restrictions.
( 4 ) *Adhesive.* The adhesive shall be an all-purpose waterproof vinyl type. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. EC-870 or EC-1070, United States Rubber Co. M6256, Herculite Protective Fabrics Corp. CVV, Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. R.828, or equal, are acceptable.
( 5 ) *Reinforcing fabric.* The reinforcing fabric shall be type II, class I, laminated vinyl-nylon high strength cloth in accordance with the requirements of Specification MIL-C-43006.
( d ) *Grab Straps.* The grab straps shall be of materials permitted for the cover, or approved equivalent.
( e ) *Thread.* Each thread must meet the requirements of subpart 164.023 of this chapter. Only one kind of thread may be used in each seam.
( f ) *Welting.* The welting where used may be of any fiber or plastic material suitable for the purpose.
[CGFR 65-37, 30 FR 11586, Sept. 10, 1965, as amended by CGFR 70-143, 35 FR 19964, Dec. 30, 1970; CGD 78-012, 43 FR 27154, June 22, 1978; CGD 84-068, 58 FR 29493, May 20, 1993]
#### Daniel W. Powers, *Respondent, v.*John H. Carpenter, *Appel*lant.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.
§ 139.165 Documentation. ( a ) Each TPO must retain the results of each survey or audit conducted under its approval, including: ( 1 ) The names of the auditors and/or surveyors;
( 2 ) The results of each audit or survey conducted; and
( 3 ) Documentation showing continuing actions relative to an audit or survey, such as resolution of deficiencies and non-conformities.
( b ) Each TPO must also retain the results of audits of their organization conducted by the Coast Guard.
( c ) Records required by this part must be retained for a period of 5 years.
[CAGAN-MCAFEE LETTERHEAD]

Exhibit 10.4

May 5,
2004

Mr. Robert
S. Herlin
Chief Executive Officer NATURAL GAS SYSTEMS, INC.Two Memorial City Plaza
820 Gessner, Suite 1340
Houston, TX 77024
Fax: 713-935-0199

RE:    Addendum
I to CMCP Advisory Agreement

Dear
Bob,

We
are pleased that Natural Gas Systems, Inc. (the "Company") previously engaged Cagan McAfee Capital Partners, LLC ("CMCP"), pursuant to our engagement agreement, dated on September 23,
2003 (the "Engagement Agreement"), as its financial advisor with respect to various matters involving the business of the Company (the "Advisory Services"). We have enjoyed working with you and look
forward to an expanded relationship with the Company as we continue in our efforts to raise capital and establish strategic relationships for the Company.

This
Addendum I memorializes the previous verbal understanding of the partiers and expands the Advisory Services offered by CMCP to include the services of Laird Q. Cagan, as a registered
representative of Chadbourn Securities, NASD broker-dealer.

The
following supplemental provisions are hereby incorporated into the Engagement Agreement between the parties (all other paragraphs remain unchanged), effective as of April 15, 2004:



1

---





We
are pleased to accept this expanded engagement and look forward to continued work with you. Please confirm that the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding of our agreement by signing
and returning to us a copy of this letter.

| |  | Respectfully,                     
| |  | ----------------------------------
| |  | CAGAN MCAFEE CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC
| |  | By:                               

Accepted
and agreed to as of the date set forth above:

NATURAL GAS SYSTEMS, INC.

|By: |  | Robert S. Herlin
Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------- |  | 

2

---



QuickLinks
# C_2012080EN.01001902.xml

| 17.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/19

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 25 January 2012 — Euris Consult v Parliament

(Case T-637/11 R)

(Application for interim measures - Public services contract - Tendering procedure - Services of translation into Maltese - Rejection of a tender - Arrangements for communication - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Loss of opportunity - Lack of serious and irreparable damage - Lack of urgency)

2012/C 80/33

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Euris Consult Ltd (Floriana, Malta) (represented by: F. Moyse, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: L. Darie and F. Poilvache, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the decision of the European Parliament of 18 October 2011 in the tendering procedure (MT/2011/EU) for the provision of translation services into Maltese (OJ S 56 090372) and rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
# C_2011252EN.01001902.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/19

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione (Italy) lodged on 9 June 2011 — Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze and Agenzia delle Entrate v Elsacom N.V.

(Case C-294/11)

2011/C 252/35

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Corte Suprema di Cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze and Agenzia delle Entrate

Applicants:

Defendant: Elsacom N.V.

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is the period of six months from the end of the calendar year in which value added tax became chargeable, being the time allowed for taxable persons not established in the territory of the country to submit an application for refund of that tax — as laid down in the last sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 7(1) of Eighth Council Directive 79/1072/EEC (1) of 6 December 1979 — a mandatory time-limit, that is to say, a time-limit non-compliance with which results in forfeiture of the right to a refund?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1979 L 331, p. 11.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001070680
<NAME> GRAND CENTRAL FINANCIAL CORP.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,545
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           7,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      3,217
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          36,899
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            35,281
<LOANS>                                         83,130
<ALLOWANCE>                                        364
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 138,572
<DEPOSITS>                                      74,079
<SHORT-TERM>                                     7,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,368
<LONG-TERM>                                     38,287
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,819
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 138,572
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,568
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,553
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   159
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,280
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,344
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,217
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,063
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  10
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,011
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    293
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         293
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       238
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.28
<LOANS-NON>                                        291
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   369
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       10
<RECOVERIES>                                         5
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  364
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               263
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            101


</TABLE>
§ 169.809 Charts and nautical publications. As appropriate for the intended voyage, all vessels must carry adequate and up-to-date— ( a ) Charts;
( b ) Sailing directions;
( c ) Coast pilots;
( d ) Light lists;
( e ) Notices to mariners;
( f ) Tide tables; and
( g ) Current tables.
#### The City of Brooklyn *ex rel.*C. A. M. Stadlmair, *Respondent, v*Charles A. Willard and Patrick Hefferman, *Appellants*.

Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.1830 Warning sign. ( a ) The master shall ensure that a vessel transferring cargo, while fast to a dock or while at anchor in port, displays a warning sign: ( 1 ) At the gangway facing the shore so that the sign may be seen from the shore; and
( 2 ) Facing outboard towards the water so that the sign may be seen from the water.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, each warning sign must have the following words: ( 1 ) Warning.
( 2 ) Dangerous Cargo.
( 3 ) No Visitors.
( 4 ) No Smoking.
( 5 ) No Open Lights.
( c ) Each letter in the words on the sign must: ( 1 ) Be block style;
( 2 ) Be black on a white background;
( 3 ) Be 7.6 cm (3 in.) high;
( 4 ) Be 5.1 cm (2 in.) wide, except for “M” and “W” which must be 7.6 cm (3 in.) wide, and the letter “I” which may be 1.3 cm (1 ⁄ 2 in.) wide; and
( 5 ) Have 1.3 cm (1 ⁄ 2 in.) stroke width.
( d ) The spacing between letters must be: ( 1 ) 1.3 cm (1 ⁄ 2 in.) between letters of the same word on the sign;
( 2 ) 5.1 cm (2 in.) between words;
( 3 ) 5.1 cm (2 in.) between lines; and
( 4 ) 5.1 cm (2 in.) at the borders of the sign.
( e ) The words “No Smoking” and “No Open Lights” may be omitted when the cargoes on board a vessel are not flammable.
( f ) When a vessel carries or transfers vinyl chloride, the warning sign under paragraph (b) of this section must also have the words “Cancer Suspect Agent.”
# C_2011113EN.01001601.xml

| 9.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/16

---

Action brought on 14 February 2011 — Formica v OHIM — Silicalia (CompacTop)

(Case T-82/11)

2011/C 113/32

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Formica, SA (Galdakao, Spain) (represented by: A. Goméz López, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Silicalia, SL (Valencia, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant requests the Court to:

| — | declare as not being in accordance with Regulation EC No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark the decision of 9 December 2010 of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM, in Case R 1083/2010-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare as not being in accordance with Regulation EC No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark the decision of 9 December 2010 of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM, in Case R 1083/2010-1;

| — | allow registration of the complex Community trade mark No 6 524 243 CompacTop, in Class 20; and |
| --- | --- |

—

allow registration of the complex Community trade mark No 6 524 243 CompacTop, in Class 20; and

| — | order the defendant and, if appropriate, the intervener, to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant and, if appropriate, the intervener, to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Formica

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘CompacTop’ for goods in Class 20.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Silicalia, SL

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community and national figurative marks containing the word elements ‘COMPACquartz’, ‘COMPACMARMOL&QUARTZ’ and ‘COMPAC MARMOL&QUARTZ’ for goods and services in Classes 19, 27, 35, 37 and 39.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1) since there is no similarity or likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1)

1

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LISA ROCHELLE LINEBARGER,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 14-14501

HON. MARIANNE O. BATTANI

v. 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 

SECURITY,

Defendant.

_________________________/

OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

AND REMANDING FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS

Plaintiff Lisa Linebarger brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g),

challenging the final decision of the Commissioner denying her applications for

supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. Plaintiff filed the claim on

May 5, 2008, alleging disability since that date. The case was before this Court for review

in 2012 and remanded for further proceedings. 

After remand, a second administrative hearing was held, and in her Decision, dated

November 18, 2013, the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) concluded that Plaintiff was not

disabled. The Appeals Council denied review, and Linebarger timely filed this action for

judicial review of the Commissioner's decision. The case was referred to Magistrate Judge

David R. Grand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. 

In a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") dated October 9, 2015, Magistrate Judge

Grand recommended that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be denied and that

2:14-cv-14501-MOB-DRG Doc # 18 Filed 01/14/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 696
Plaintiff's motion be granted to the extent it seeks remand and denied to the extent it seeks

an award of benefits. In his Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge informed

the parties that objections to the R&R needed to be filed within 14 days of service and that

a party’s failure to file objections would waive any further right of appeal. (Doc. No. 17 at

21). Neither party filed an objection. Moreover, this Court agrees with the thorough

analysis contained in the R&R. 

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation, DENIES

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, GRANTS IN PART Plaintiff’s Motion for

Summary Judgment, and REMANDS this matter further proceedings consistent with the

R&R pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: January 14, 2016 s/Marianne O. Battani 

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's ECF System to their respective

email addresses or First Class U.S. mail to the non-ECF participants on January 14, 2016.

s/ Kay Doaks 

Case Manager

2

2:14-cv-14501-MOB-DRG Doc # 18 Filed 01/14/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 697
§ 119.400 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart applies to all propulsion and auxiliary machinery installations of the internal combustion piston type.
( b ) Where no specific fuel designation exists, the requirements of this subpart are applicable to all types of fuels and machinery.