alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 189.55-15 Procedure for submittal of plans. ( a ) As the relative location of shipyards, design offices, and Coast Guard offices vary throughout the country, no specific routing will be required in the submittal of plans. In general, one of the following procedures would apply, but in a particular case, if a more expeditious procedure can be used, there will be no objection to its adoption. ( 1 ) The plans may be submitted to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, in the district in which the vessel is to be built. This procedure will be most expeditious in the case of those offices where personnel and facilities are available for examination and approval of plans locally.
( 2 ) The plans may be submitted by visitors directly to the Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center, U.S. Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593, or transmitted by mail to: Commanding Officer (MSC), Attn: Marine Safety Center, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7430, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7430, in a written or electronic format. Information for submitting the VSP electronically can be found at *http://www.uscg.mil/HQ/MSC .* In this case, the plans will be returned directly to the submitter, with a copy of the action being forwarded to the interested Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
( 3 ) In the case of classed vessels, upon specific request by the submitter, the American Bureau of Shipping will arrange to forward the necessary plans to the Coast Guard indicating its action thereon. In this case, the plans will be returned as noted in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
[CGFR 67-83, 33 FR 1118, Jan. 27, 1968] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 189.55-15, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
§ 171.017 One and two compartment standards of flooding. ( a ) *One compartment standard of flooding.* A vessel is designed to a one compartment standard of flooding if the margin line is not submerged when the total buoyancy between each set of two adjacent main transverse watertight bulkheads is lost.
( b ) *Two compartment standard of flooding.* A vessel is designed to a two compartment standard of flooding if the margin line is not submerged when the total buoyancy between each set of three adjacent main transverse watertight bulkheads is lost.
Appliance Standards - Commercial Unitary Air Conditioners - Framework Document Public Meeting

Search Help More Search Options Search

EERE Information Center

Commercial Unitary Air 

Conditioners and Heat Pumps

Framework Document Public 

Meeting

Date: October 1, 2001

Purpose: The purpose of this meeting was to hear the views of interested 

persons on the issues and process involved in a rulemaking to consider 

energy efficiency standards for commercial unitary air conditioners and 

heat pumps. The Department of Energy considered the views presented 

and comments submitted in formulating its approach in the rulemaking. 

The following documents are available as Adobe Acrobat PDFs. Download 

Acrobat Reader.

Public Meeting Materials:

● Notice of public workshop and availability of the Framework 

Document Commercial Unitary Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps 

Energy Efficiency Standards (PDF 51 KB) 

● Agenda

Meeting Presentations

● Introduction, (PDF 240 KB) 

● Market and Technology Assessment, (PDF 240 KB) 

● Screening Analysis, (PDF 150 KB) 

● Engineering Analysis, (PDF 181 KB) 

● Life-Cycle Cost Analysis, (PDF 181 KB) 

● Consumer Subgroup Analysis, (PDF 79 KB) 

● National Energy Saving and Net Present Value Analysis, (PDF 125 

KB) 

● Manufacturer Impact Analysis, (PDF 106 KB) 

● Employment Impact, (PDF 75 KB) 

● Utility Impact Analysis, (PDF 89 KB) 

● Environmental Analysis, (PDF 79 KB) 

Framework Document

● Framework Document (PDF 125 KB) 

Printable Version

http://www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/cuac_framework_meeting.html (1 of 2)11/10/2005 7:00:45 AM

EE-RM-STD-01-375 COMMENT 02RR
Appliance Standards - Commercial Unitary Air Conditioners - Framework Document Public Meeting

Webmaster | Security & Privacy | Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home

U.S. Department of Energy

Content Last Updated: 07/28/2004

http://www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/cuac_framework_meeting.html (2 of 2)11/10/2005 7:00:45 AM

EE-RM-STD-01-375 COMMENT 02RR
###### Editorial Note on Part 150

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59783, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 150.140 Cargoes not listed in Table 1 or 2.

A cargo of hazardous material not listed in Table I or II must be handled as if incompatible with all other cargoes until the Commandant CG-ENG-5) (Telephone 202-372-1420) assigns the hazardous material to a compatibility group. (Table I lists cargoes alphabetically while Table II lists cargoes by compatibility group).

[CGD 83-047, 50 FR 33038, Aug. 16, 1985, CGD 86-100, 52 FR 21037, June 4, 1987; CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 19955; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50731, Sept. 27, 1996; USCG-2006-25697, 71 FR 55746, Sept. 25, 2006; USCG;-2013-0423, 85 FR 21674, Apr. 17, 2020]
**EXHIBIT 11**

 

Statement Reference Computation of Per ShareEarnings

 

Primary earnings (loss) per share amounts were computed on the basis ofthe weighted average number of shares of common stock during the year.  The weighted average number of shares usedfor this computation was 1,528,268 for 2003, 1,483,493 for 2002 and 1,469,489for 2001, and 1,479,520 for 2000, and 1,422,287 for 1999.

 

Fully diluted earnings (loss) per share amounts were computed on thebasis of the weighted average number of shares of common stock and common stockequivalents outstanding during the year. Common stock equivalents include employee stock options.  The weighted average number of shares usedfor this computation was 1,796,859, 1,744,082, 1,701,827, 1,705,258 and1,702,585, in 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.

 

----
§ 169.207 Period of validity for a Certificate of Inspection. ( a ) A Certificate of Inspection is valid for 5 years.
( b ) Certificates of inspection may be revoked, or suspended and withdrawn by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, at any time for noncompliance with the provisions of this subchapter or requirements established thereunder.
[CGD 83-005, 51 FR 896, Jan. 9, 1986, as amended by USCG-1999-4976, 65 FR 6507, Feb. 9, 2000]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cr-20627 

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

D-4 JUAN DELGADO, JR., 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING 

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA 

AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT 

On July 14, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris conducted a plea 

hearing pursuant to Defendant’s consent. The Magistrate Judge issued her report on July 21, 

2016, recommending that this Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty. 

Although the Magistrate Judge’s report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may 

object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, 

neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The failure to file objections waives any 

right to appeal the magistrate judge’s findings that Defendant was competent to enter a plea, and 

that the plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily, without coercion, and with a basis in fact. 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, 

ECF No. 91, is ADOPTED. 

 It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s plea of guilty is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 

Plea Agreement, ECF No. 89, is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT. 

1:14-cr-20627-TLL-PTM Doc # 96 Filed 09/23/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 375
- 2 - 

Dated: September 23, 2016 s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on September 23, 2016. 

 s/Michael A. Sian 

 MICHAEL A. SIAN, Case Manager 

1:14-cr-20627-TLL-PTM Doc # 96 Filed 09/23/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 376
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

**Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Universal Access Global Holdings Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.**

 

 
| Dated:  May 14, 2004 | /S/ Brian W. Coderre                 |   |
|--------------------------------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                           | Name: Brian W. Coderre               |
|                           | Title: Chief Financial Officer  |

 

1

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 160

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 160.170-11 [Reserved]
# C_2013108EN.01002202.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 February 2013 — Caventa v OHIM — Anson’s Herrenhaus (BERG)

(Case T-225/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark BERG - Earlier Community word mark Christian Berg - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 108/59

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Caventa AG (Rekingen, Switzerland) (represented initially by: J. Krenzel, then by T. Stein and A. Segler, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by: R. Manea, then by D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Anson's Herrenhaus KG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: O Löffel and P. Lange, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 February 2011 (Case R 740/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Anson’s Herrenhaus KG and Caventa AG.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Caventa AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Caventa AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 194, 2.7.2011.

1

---
# C_2011238EN.01003801.xml

| 13.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/38

---

Corrigendum to the notice in the Official Journal in Case T-242/11

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 211 of 16 July 2011, p. 27
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 211 of 16 July 2011, p. 27

2011/C 238/67

The notice in the Official Journal concerning Case T-242/11, Kaltenbach & Voigt v OHIM (3D eXam), is to read as follows:

Kaltenbach & Voigt

OHIM (3D eXam)

Action brought on 9 May 2011 — Kaltenbach & Voigt v OHIM (3D eXam)

(Case T-242/11)

2011/C 238/67

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Kaltenbach & Voigt GmbH (Biberach an der Riß, Germany) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 March 2011 in case R 2361/2010-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 March 2011 in case R 2361/2010-2;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark in words “3D eXam” for goods in class 10

Decision of the Examiner: Refused the protection of the international registration to the European Union pursuant to Article 7(1)(b), (c) and Article 7(2) CTMR

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Council Regulation No 207/2009 and the failure to take into account prior national registrations/grants of protection, as the International registration at issue: (i) is not purely descriptive, and; (ii) exhibits distinctiveness as the relevant public will consider the sign “3D eXam” as an indication of trade origin.

---
# C_2012025EN.01005203.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/52

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 24 November 2011 — Éditions Jacob v Commission

(Case T-471/11 R)

(Application for interim measures - Competition - Concentration of enterprises - Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the common market subject to sale of assets - Annulment by the General Court of the initial decision on the Commission’s approval of the purchaser of the sold assets - Application for suspension of operation of the decision on the further approval of the same purchaser - No urgency - Weighing of interests)

(2012/C 25/103)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Éditions Odile Jacob SA (Paris, France)) (represented by: O. Fréget, M. Struys and L. Eskenazi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito, O. Beynet and S. Noë, agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2011) 3503 of 13 May 2011 on the approval of Wendel Investissement SA as the purchaser of the assets sold in accordance with Commission Decision 2004/422/EC of 7 January 2004 declaring a concentration compatible with the common market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/M.2978 — Lagardère/Natexis/VUP)),

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated statement of financial condition and the consolidated statement of
income and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,891
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             330
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                15,510
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     43,147
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          54,921
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            55,027
<LOANS>                                        493,046
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,763
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 628,219
<DEPOSITS>                                     429,004
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,377
<LONG-TERM>                                     49,263
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            95
<OTHER-SE>                                     138,335
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 628,219
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 26,668
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,159
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,002
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                31,829
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              13,451
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,531
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           16,298
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      785
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   2
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 16,405
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,284
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         765
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       765
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.83
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,636
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,306
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,533
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      769
<RECOVERIES>                                       214
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,763
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,942
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            821
        

</TABLE>
§ 169.527 Required equipment for lifeboats. ( a ) All lifeboats must be equipped in accordance with table 1 to 46 CFR 199.175 except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) The following equipment must be carried in addition to the equipment required under 46 CFR 199.175: ( 1 ) Cover;
( 2 ) Ditty bag; and
( 3 ) Mast and sail.
( c ) If operating on protected waters, lifeboat equipment need only to consist of the following: ( 1 ) Boathook—(1);
( 2 ) Bucket—(1);
( 3 ) Fire extinguisher—(2) U.S. Coast Guard-approved Type B:C (motor propelled lifeboats only);
( 4 ) Hatchet—(1);
( 5 ) Lifeline—(1);
( 6 ) Oar unit—(1);
( 7 ) Painter—(1);
( 8 ) Plug—(1);
( 9 ) Oarlock unit—(1); and
( 10 ) Toolkit (motor propelled lifeboats only).
[USCG-2020-0107, 87 FR 68306, Nov. 14, 2022; 88 FR 51737, Aug. 4, 2023]
§ 171.118 Automatic ventilators and side ports. ( a ) An automatic ventilator must not be fitted in the side of a vessel below the bulkhead deck unless approved by the Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center.
( b ) The design and construction of each gangway, cargo and coaling port, and similar opening in the side of a vessel must be approved by the Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center.
( c ) In no case may the lowest point of any gangway, cargo and coaling port, or similar opening be below the deepest subdivision load line.
[CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51017, Nov. 4, 1983, as amended by CGD 88-070, 53 FR 34537, Sept. 7, 1988]
#### § 188.10-9 Chemical storeroom.

This term refers to any compartment specifically constructed or modified for the stowage of chemical stores and so designated and identified.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2319 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2319

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make all veterans 
   eligible for home loans under the veterans mortgage revenue bond 
                                program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2009

Mr. Blumenauer (for himself, Mr. Filner, Mrs. Davis of California, Mr. 
Schrader, Mr. Walden, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Wu, Mr. Kind, Mr. Kagen, Mr. Al 
Green of Texas, and Mr. Young of Alaska) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make all veterans 
   eligible for home loans under the veterans mortgage revenue bond 
                                program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans' Home Loan Improvement Act 
of 2009''.

SEC. 2. ALL VETERANS MADE ELIGIBLE FOR HOME LOANS UNDER VETERANS 
              MORTGAGE REVENUE BOND PROVISIONS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (4) of section 143(l) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
            ``(4) Qualified veteran.--For purposes of this subsection, 
        the term `qualified veteran' means any veteran who served on 
        active duty.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to financing provided after the date of the enactment of this Act under 
issues issued before, on, or after such date.
                                 <all>
```