alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013325EN.01003201.xml

| 9.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Netherlands v Commission

(Case T-343/11) (1)

(EAGGF - Guarantee Section - Expenditure excluded from financing - Fruits and vegetables - Exclusion of financing of costs of printing on packaging - Non-compliance with criteria for recognising a producers’ organisation - Exclusion of expenses of all members of the producers’ organisation in question - Proportionality)

(2013/C 325/53)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C. Wissels, M. de Ree, B. Koopman and C. Schillemans, subsequently by C. Wissels, M. de Ree and C. Schillemans, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet and P. Rossi, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision 2011/244/EU of 15 April 2011 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2011 L 102, p. 33) in so far as it concerns certain expenditure incurred by the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-10200

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DONALD GENE RHOADES,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:00-CR-226-1-Y

-------------------- November 29, 2001

Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Donald Gene Rhoades appeals from his jury conviction for

conspiracy to manufacture over 50 grams of methamphetamine.

Rhoades argues that there is no evidence of an agreement

between him and any person to manufacture methamphetamine. He also

argues that there was insufficient evidence that he intended to

manufacture more than 50 grams of methamphetamine. We have

reviewed the trial testimony and hold that the jury could have

rationally concluded beyond a reasonable doubt t hat Rhoades was

aware of Larry Robinson’s intention to manufacture methamphetamine;No. 01-10200

-2-

that, with this knowledge, he attempted to procure a necessary

ingredient for Robinson to make the drugs; and that the conspiracy

intended to produce more than 50 grams of methamphetamine. U nited

States v. Gonzales , 79 F.3d 413, 423 (5th Cir. 1996).

Rhoades also challenges the calculation of his offense level

based his intent to manufacture more than 50 grams of

methamphetamine. The district court’s determination of drug

quantity need be supported by only a preponderance of the evidence.

United States v. Gaytan , 74 F.3d 545, 558 (5th Cir. 1996). As

discussed above, the evidence supports the jury’s finding, based on

the much stricter reasonable doubt standard, that Rhoades intended

to manufacture more than 50 grams of drugs. Accordingly, the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
# C_2013189EN.01001803.xml

| 29.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2013 — Nath Kalsi v OHIM — American Clothing Associates (RIDGE WOOD)

(Case T-80/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark RIDGE WOOD - Earlier Community figurative mark River Woods North-Eastern Suppliers - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 189/35

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Dwarka Nath Kalsi and Ajit Nath Kalsi (Agra, India) (represented by: J. Schmidt, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: K. Klüpfel, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: American Clothing Associates (Evergem, Belgium) (represented by: C. De Keersmaeker, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 November 2010 in Case R 599/2010-1, relating to opposition proceedings between, on the one hand, American Clothing Associates and, on the other hand, Dwarka Nath Kalsi and Ajit Nath Kalsi

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 19 November 2010 (Case R 1073/2010-2) in so far as it concerns goods in Class 24 covered by the mark applied for and the services ‘processing and finishing of skins, leather, furs and textiles’ in Class 40 and covered by the earlier mark No 2785459; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 19 November 2010 (Case R 1073/2010-2) in so far as it concerns goods in Class 24 covered by the mark applied for and the services ‘processing and finishing of skins, leather, furs and textiles’ in Class 40 and covered by the earlier mark No 2785459;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders Dwarka Nath Kalsi and Ajit Nath Kalsi, and OHIM to each pay their own costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Dwarka Nath Kalsi and Ajit Nath Kalsi, and OHIM to each pay their own costs;

| 4. | Orders American Clothing Associates to pay its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders American Clothing Associates to pay its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 103, 2.4.2011.

1

---
5:14-cv-14370-JEL-MKM   Doc # 1-1   Filed 11/13/14   Pg 1 of 14    Pg ID 4

5:14-cv-14370-JEL-MKM   Doc # 1-1   Filed 11/13/14   Pg 2 of 14    Pg ID 5

5:14-cv-14370-JEL-MKM   Doc # 1-1   Filed 11/13/14   Pg 3 of 14    Pg ID 6

5:14-cv-14370-JEL-MKM   Doc # 1-1   Filed 11/13/14   Pg 4 of 14    Pg ID 7

5:14-cv-14370-JEL-MKM   Doc # 1-1   Filed 11/13/14   Pg 5 of 14    Pg ID 8

5:14-cv-14370-JEL-MKM   Doc # 1-1   Filed 11/13/14   Pg 6 of 14    Pg ID 9

5:14-cv-14370-JEL-MKM   Doc # 1-1   Filed 11/13/14   Pg 7 of 14    Pg ID 10

5:14-cv-14370-JEL-MKM   Doc # 1-1   Filed 11/13/14   Pg 8 of 14    Pg ID 11

5:14-cv-14370-JEL-MKM   Doc # 1-1   Filed 11/13/14   Pg 9 of 14    Pg ID 12

5:14-cv-14370-JEL-MKM   Doc # 1-1   Filed 11/13/14   Pg 10 of 14    Pg ID 13

5:14-cv-14370-JEL-MKM   Doc # 1-1   Filed 11/13/14   Pg 11 of 14    Pg ID 14

5:14-cv-14370-JEL-MKM   Doc # 1-1   Filed 11/13/14   Pg 12 of 14    Pg ID 15

5:14-cv-14370-JEL-MKM   Doc # 1-1   Filed 11/13/14   Pg 13 of 14    Pg ID 16

5:14-cv-14370-JEL-MKM   Doc # 1-1   Filed 11/13/14   Pg 14 of 14    Pg ID 17
EX-10.2





 Exhibit 10.2 
  





 
 Gregory Case 
 Aon Corporation

 United States 
 June 19, 2020 

International Assignment: Chicago, Illinois to London, England 

Dear Greg, 
 This letter serves to amend your international
assignment letter effective July 1, 2016 governing the terms of your international assignment from Chicago, Illinois to London, England (your “International Assignment Letter”). 

Pursuant to this letter, the term of your international assignment shall be extended an additional one year, through June 30, 2021. 

Except as otherwise expressly modified herein, the terms of the International Assignment Letter, and your acknowledgment and acceptance thereof, shall
continue in full force and effect. 
 Please confirm acceptance of the terms and conditions of this letter by signing below and returning a copy of the
signed letter to me. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	 /s/ Lisa Stevens

	Lisa Stevens
	Chief People Officer
	
	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	
	 /s/ Gregory Case

	Gregory Case
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Daniel Mckinney, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Asia Properties, Inc. hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the report on Form 10Q of Asia Properties, Inc., for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Asia Properties, Inc..

Date: December 10, 2009.

Daniel Mckinney (Principal Executive Officer)Chief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Dallas Buyers Club, LLC, )

)

) Case No.: 2:14-cv-14806-MFL-EAS

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

) 

DOES 1-19, )

 ) 

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff hereby files this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal, without prejudice, as to all remaining Defendants identified in Plaintiff’s Complaint 

that have not already been dismissed. This terminates the matter.

DATED: June 9, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

By: s/Paul J. Nicoletti

Paul Nicoletti (P-44419)

NICOLETTI LAW, PLC

33717 Woodward Avenue, Ste. #433

Birmingham, MI 48009

Landline: (248) 203-7800

eFax: (248) 928-7051

Email: pauljnicoletti@gmail.com

http://www.nicolettilawplc.com 

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF 

DALLAS BUYERS CLUB, LLC

2:14-cv-14806-MFL-EAS Doc # 9 Filed 06/09/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 55
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.006-2 Grades. ( a ) Deck coverings shall be of but one grade as specified in this subpart, and shall be known as “an approved deck covering.”
( b ) [Reserved]
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**529 CA 13-01301**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

LAURA LANKENAU, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

PATRICK K. BOLES, M & S LEASING CO., LLC, DEENA LANKENAU AND DOUGLAS LANKENAU, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

SMITH, SOVIK, KENDRICK & SUGNET, P.C., SYRACUSE (EDWARD J. SMITH, III, OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
RUPP, BAASE, PFALZGRAF, CUNNINGHAM & COPPOLA LLC, BUFFALO (MELISSA L. VINCTON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS PATRICK K. BOLES AND M & S LEASING CO., LLC.
BURKE, SCOLAMIERO, MORTATI & HURD, LLP, ALBANY (MARK G. MITCHELL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS DEENA LANKENAU AND DOUGLAS LANKENAU.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered June 25, 2013. The order denied the motion of plaintiff for leave to reargue her motion to dismiss certain affirmative defenses of defendants.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City , 167 AD2d 983, 984).

Entered: July 11, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 99.2

                      JOINT CO-CEO/CFO CERTIFICATE REQUIRED

               UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Each of the undersigned, the Co-Chief Executive Officers and the Chief
Financial Officer of CoolBrands International Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Company's report on Form 40-F for
the fiscal year ended August 31, 2002, (the "Annual Report"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: January 17, 2003

                                           /s/ David J. Stein
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           David J. Stein
                                           Co-Chief Executive Officer


                                           /s/ Richard E. Smith
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           Richard E. Smith
                                           Co-Chief Executive Officer


                                           /s/ Gary P. Stevens
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           Gary P. Stevens
                                           Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 164

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 164.139-1 Scope.

This subpart prescribes requirements for approval of fire dampers as required by the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS).
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 151.03-31 Headquarters.

Commandant (CG-5P), Attn: Assistant Commandant for Prevention, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7501, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7501

[CGFR 70-10, 35 FR 3714, Feb. 25, 1970, as amended by CGD 88-070, 53 FR 34535, Sept. 7, 1988; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60155, Sept. 30, 2013]
§ 11.514 Service requirements for national endorsement as second assistant engineer of steam, motor, and/or gas turbine-propelled vessels. ( a ) The minimum service required to qualify an applicant for endorsement as second assistant engineer of steam, motor, and/or gas turbine-propelled vessels is— ( 1 ) One year of service as an assistant engineer, while holding a license or MMC endorsement as third assistant engineer; or
( 2 ) One year of service while holding a license or MMC endorsement as third assistant engineer, which includes— ( i ) A minimum of 6 months of service as third assistant engineer; and
( ii ) Additional service as a qualified member of the engine department, calculated on a two-for-one basis.
( b ) A person holding this endorsement may qualify for an STCW endorsement, according to §§ 11.327, 11.329, and 11.333 of this part.
#### Emma J. Dargin, *Respondent, v.*George W. Decker and others, *Appellants, Impleaded with*Palmer B. Wells, *Responde*nt.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Brady, J.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 58 (Tuesday, March 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14312]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1489]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Board of Governors; Sunshine Act Meeting

Board Votes to Close March 16, 2007 Meeting

    At its teleconference meeting on March 14, 2007, the Board of 
Governors of the United States Postal Service voted unanimously to 
close to public observation its meeting scheduled for March 16, 2007, 
in Washington, DC, via teleconference. The Board determined that prior 
public notice was not possible.

Item Considered: Postal Regulatory Commission Opinion and Recommended 
Decision in Docket No. R2006-1, Postal Rate and Fee Charges.

General Counsel Certification: The General Counsel of the United States 
Postal Services has certified that the meeting was properly closed 
under the Government in the Sunshine Act.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for information about the 
meeting should be addressed to the Secretary of the Board, Wendy A. 
Hocking, at (202) 268-4800.

Wendy A. Hocking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-1489 Filed 3-22-07; 4:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)Certification**

I, Joseph J. Millin,certify that:

1.               I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NexteraEnterprises, Inc.;

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

a)              designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosures controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b)             evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)              disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting  that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)              all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)             any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  May 15, 2007 |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
|                     | By:   /s/ Joseph J. Millin |   |
|                     | President |
|                     | (Principal  Executive Officer) |

 

----
§ 13.303 Service requirements. Each applicant for a tankerman-PIC (barge) endorsement for DL or LG must meet the requirements of either paragraphs (a) and (b) or paragraph (c) of this section. ( a ) Each applicant must present evidence of— ( 1 ) At least 60 days of service, whether by shore-based or by vessel-based personnel, on one or more tank vessels certified to carry DL or LG appropriate to the endorsement applied for; or
( 2 ) At least 6 months of closely related service directly involved with tank barges appropriate to the endorsement applied for; and
( b ) Participation, under the supervision of a tankerman-PIC or tankerman-PIC (barge), in at least 10 transfers of liquid cargo in bulk of the classification desired on any tank vessel, including at least— ( 1 ) Five loadings and five discharges;
( 2 ) Two commencements of loading and two completions of loading; and
( 3 ) Two commencements of discharge and two completions of discharge.
( c ) Each applicant already holding an MMD or MMC endorsed tankerman-PIC (barge) for DL and seeking an endorsement for LG, or the converse, must— ( 1 ) Provide evidence of at least half the service required by paragraph (a) of this section; and
( 2 ) Comply with paragraph (b) of this section, except that he or she need provide evidence of only three loadings and three discharges along with evidence of compliance with paragraphs (b)(2) and (3) of this section.
[CGD 79-116, 60 FR 17142, Apr. 4, 1995, as amended by CGD 79-116, 62 FR 25134, May 8, 1997; USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11260, Mar. 16, 2009; USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 77996, Dec. 24, 2013]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0160

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ANDREW LAIN GIBBS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 27, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 20 2021

08/20/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0160
JULIAN CHRISTOPHER 

HOWARD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-3088

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 29, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Levy County.

Mary Day Coker, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Joanna Aurica Mauer, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Angela R. Hensel, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, RAY, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.