alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2226 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2226

                       To rescind certain funds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 2009

Mr. Turner (for himself, Mrs. Schmidt, and Mr. Boehner) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                       To rescind certain funds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Warren County National Debt 
Reduction Act''.

SEC. 2. PURPOSE.

    The purpose of this bill is to ensure that stimulus funding, which 
was rejected by the Warren County Ohio Board of Commissioners on March 
17, 2009, because it was not needed, is returned to the treasury to 
reduce the national debt to be inherited by future generations.

SEC. 3. RESCISSION.

    There is hereby rescinded $373,000 to be derived from the amount 
apportioned to the State of Ohio under section 5311 of title 49, United 
States Code, and made available from division A of title XII of Public 
Law 111-5, under the heading ``Federal Transit Administration, Transit 
Assistance''.
                                 <all>
```
APPENDIX 1 

FIGURES 
Figure 1. General Location Map with Federal Coal Leases and LBA Tracts 
Figure 2. West Antelope II LBA Tract Alternatives 
Figure 3. West Antelope II North and South Tract Selected Configurations
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
for the period covered by this Report.
 Dated:  August 14, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Mark S. AllioMark S. AllioChairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive OfficerDated:  August 14, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Therese Ann LiutkusTherese Ann Liutkus, CPATreasurer and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TIMOTHY HENES,

Plaintiff, Case No. 14-11715

Hon. Marianne O. Battani

v.

 Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub

ROSCOMMON COUNTY JAIL, 

et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT 

AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM 

AGAINST DEFENDANT VIGUILLA WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Plaintiff Timothy Henes filed this civil rights action, seeking relief under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983, on April 24, 2014. On June 2, 2014, the Court referred this matter to Magistrate

Judge Mona K. Majzoub for all pretrial matters (Doc. No. 20). Defendants filed a Motion

for Summary Judgment on September 11, 2014 (Doc. No. 29). 

In her Report and Recommendation, dated June 12, 2015, Magistrate Judge

Majzoub recommended that Defendants’ motion be granted. In addition, she

recommended that Plaintiff’s claims against defendant Viguilla be dismissed without

prejudice for failure to serve pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). The Magistrate Judge

informed the parties that objections to the Report and Recommendation must be filed within

fourteen days of service and that a party’s failure to file objections would waive any further

right of appeal. (Doc. No. 46 at 13). 

2:14-cv-11715-MOB-MKM Doc # 47 Filed 08/18/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 240
No objection has been filed. Moreover, the Courts finds the analysis thoroughly

recounted the allegations and properly applied the governing law in reaching the

recommendation to grant Defendants’ motion. In addition, Plaintiff’s failure to serve Viguilla

in a timely manner warrants dismissal without prejudice. 

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations and

GRANTS Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s

claims against Defendant Viguilla without prejudice. This matter is DISMISSED it its

entirety. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: August 18, 2015 s/Marianne O. Battani 

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's ECF System to their respective

email addresses or First Class U.S. mail to the non-ECF participants on August 18, 2015.

s/ Kay Doaks 

Case Manager

2

2:14-cv-11715-MOB-MKM Doc # 47 Filed 08/18/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 241
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.312 Ventilation system standards. A cargo handling space ventilation system must meet the following: ( a ) A ventilation system exhaust duct must discharge no less than 10 m (approx. 32.8 ft) from openings into or ventilation intakes for, accommodation or service spaces.
( b ) A ventilation system must not recycle vapors from ventilation discharges.
( c ) Except for the space served by the ventilation duct, a ventilation duct must not pass through a machinery room, an accommodation space, or working spaces.
( d ) A ventilation system must be operable from outside the space it ventilates.
( e ) A ventilation system must be sized to change the air in the ventilated space at least 30 times per hour.
( f ) A ventilation system must not allow air to stagnate in any part of a ventilated space.
( g ) A ventilation system must be able to exhaust air from both above and below the deck plates of a ventilated space.
Home » **North American Environmental Atlas**

## North American Environmental Atlas

### Mapping North America's Shared Environment

January 29, 20104 pages

## North American Environmental Atlas

### Mapping North America's Shared Environment

January 29, 20104 pages
----

Backscatter data is draped over shaded-relief data. Site is located between lava flow to the west and reef edge to the east. Note the sparse nature of the high-backscatter dredged material deposit.  The scale across the bottom on the image is about 3 km.  Vertical exaggeration = 15x.

----

----

----

SusanA. Cochran

U.S. Department of the Interior,U.S.Geological Survey,Western RegionCoastal and Marine Geology
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2154 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2154

 To amend chapter 15 of title 5, United States Code, to provide for an 
 additional, limited exception to the provision prohibiting a State or 
 local officer or employee from being a candidate for elective office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 28, 2009

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend chapter 15 of title 5, United States Code, to provide for an 
 additional, limited exception to the provision prohibiting a State or 
 local officer or employee from being a candidate for elective office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCEPTION TO PROHIBITION.

    (a) In General.--Section 1503 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``Section''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b)(1) Section 1502(a)(3) does not prohibit any State or local 
officer or employee from being a candidate for any office of any local 
unit of general purpose government which has a population of less than 
100,000 (determined in accordance with regulations under section 
1302(d) based on the most recent population data available under 
section 183(a) of title 13).
    ``(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term `local unit of 
general purpose government' has the meaning given such term by section 
184 of title 13.''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendments.--(1) The heading for 
section 1503 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting 
``and certain other'' before ``candidacies permitted''.
    (2) The table of sections for chapter 15 of title 5, United States 
Code, is amended by striking the item relating to section 1503 and 
inserting the following:

``1503. Nonpartisan and certain other candidacies permitted.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                             SIEBEL SYSTEMS, INC.
            STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                            1997          1996         1995
                                        ------------  ------------ ------------
                                        (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S>                                     <C>           <C>          <C>
Net income (loss)...................... $     (2,427) $      5,025 $        317
                                        ============  ============ ============
Weighted average shares outstanding....       34,428        24,800       16,148
Dilutive potential common shares.......          --          8,931        8,903
                                        ------------  ------------ ------------
Shares used in net income (loss) per
 diluted share computation.............       34,428        33,731       25,051
                                        ============  ============ ============
Net income (loss) per diluted share.... $      (0.07) $       0.15 $       0.01
                                        ============  ============ ============
Net income (loss) per basic share...... $      (0.07) $       0.20 $       0.02
                                        ============  ============ ============
</TABLE>
--------
Notes:
Potential common shares of 5,822,000 are not included in the computation of
net loss per diluted share in 1997 as the effect would be anti-dilutive.
 
Potential common shares include convertible preferred stock, as if converted,
in 1996 and 1995 and common stock options, using the treasury stock method,
for all periods presented.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND> 
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS 
ON PAGES F-2 THROUGH F-3 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001005530
<NAME>                        Merit Behavioral Care Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         47,375
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  30,379
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,996
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               80,535
<PP&E>                                         89,017
<DEPRECIATION>                                 21,137
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 344,801
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          88,663
<BONDS>                                        253,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       284
<OTHER-SE>                                     (29,766)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   344,801
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               457,830
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  361,684
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               25,869
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             23,826
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (22,201)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,332)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (16,869)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      (1,012)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (17,881)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
2:15-cr-20019-MFL-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 01/15/15 Pg 1 of 19 Pg ID 1
2:15-cr-20019-MFL-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 01/15/15 Pg 2 of 19 Pg ID 2
2:15-cr-20019-MFL-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 01/15/15 Pg 3 of 19 Pg ID 3
2:15-cr-20019-MFL-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 01/15/15 Pg 4 of 19 Pg ID 4
2:15-cr-20019-MFL-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 01/15/15 Pg 5 of 19 Pg ID 5
2:15-cr-20019-MFL-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 01/15/15 Pg 6 of 19 Pg ID 6
2:15-cr-20019-MFL-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 01/15/15 Pg 7 of 19 Pg ID 7
2:15-cr-20019-MFL-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 01/15/15 Pg 8 of 19 Pg ID 8
2:15-cr-20019-MFL-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 01/15/15 Pg 9 of 19 Pg ID 9
2:15-cr-20019-MFL-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 01/15/15 Pg 10 of 19 Pg ID 10
2:15-cr-20019-MFL-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 01/15/15 Pg 11 of 19 Pg ID 11
2:15-cr-20019-MFL-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 01/15/15 Pg 12 of 19 Pg ID 12
2:15-cr-20019-MFL-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 01/15/15 Pg 13 of 19 Pg ID 13
2:15-cr-20019-MFL-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 01/15/15 Pg 14 of 19 Pg ID 14
2:15-cr-20019-MFL-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 01/15/15 Pg 15 of 19 Pg ID 15
2:15-cr-20019-MFL-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 01/15/15 Pg 16 of 19 Pg ID 16
2:15-cr-20019-MFL-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 01/15/15 Pg 17 of 19 Pg ID 17
2:15-cr-20019-MFL-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 01/15/15 Pg 18 of 19 Pg ID 18
2:15-cr-20019-MFL-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 01/15/15 Pg 19 of 19 Pg ID 19
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Central Federal Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date:      August 13, 2008
    /s/ Mark S. AllioMark S. AllioChairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.30 [Reserved]
# C_2013026EN.01006903.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/69

---

Order of the General Court of 14 November 2012 — S & S Szlegiel Szlegiel i Wiśniewski v OHIM — Scotch & Soda (SODA)

(Case T-590/11) (1)

1

2013/C 26/137

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Dallas Buyers Club, LLC, )

)

) Case: No. 14-cv-11649

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

) 

Does 1-11, )

 ) 

Defendants. )

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE THIRD PARTY SUBPOENAS 

PRIOR TO A RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d)(1), and upon the attached: (1) Memorandum of Law in 

support of this motion; and (2) Declaration of Daniel Macek in support of this motion, Plaintiff 

respectfully moves for entry of an order granting it leave to serve third party subpoenas prior to a 

Rule 26(f) conference (the “Motion”). A proposed order is attached for the Court’s convenience.

DATED: May 8, 2014 Respectfully submitted,

By : /s/ Paul J. Nicoletti

Paul Nicoletti (P-44419)

NICOLETTI LAW, PLC

33717 Woodward Avenue, Ste. #433

Birmingham, MI 48009

Landline: (248) 203-7800

eFax: (248) 928-7051

Email: pauljnicoletti@gmail.com

http://www.nicolettilawplc.com

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF 

DALLAS BUYERS CLUB, LLC

4:14-cv-11649-LVP-PJK Doc # 3 Filed 05/08/14 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 13
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-82,653-01, WR-82,653-02, 82,653-03 & 82,653-04

EX PARTE TERRY CLARK SHELTON, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. W09-20518-U(A), W09-73040-U(A), W10-21198-U(A) & W10-55874-U(A)

IN THE 291 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT ST

FROM DALLAS COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted in four causes

of aggravated robbery, and sentenced to imprisonment for fifty years in each cause.

The trial court signed orders designating issues on July 10, 2014. After 180 days from the

daythe writ applications were served on the State, the writ applications were forwarded to this Court.

TEX. R. APP. P. 73.5. 

Applicant has alleged facts which, if true, could entitle him to relief. We remand these
applications to the 291 District Court of Dallas County to allow the trial judge to complete an st

evidentiary investigation and enter findings of fact and conclusions of law.

These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. 

The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: February 4, 2015

Do not publish
First Amendment to Employment Agreement


 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 The Employment Agreement
effective as of January 1, 2004, by and between SUSQUEHANNA BANCSHARES, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Company”), and VALLEY FORGE ASSET MANAGEMENT CORP., a Pennsylvania corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company (“VFAM”), on the one side, and BERNARD A. FRANCIS, JR., an adult individual (the “Employee”), on the other side, is hereby amended as follows: 
  
 1. Paragraph 3 is amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
  
 3. Period of Employment. Unless terminated earlier pursuant to subparagraph 7.3, 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, 10.5
or 10.7 hereof, the period of employment shall commence on the effective date of this Agreement and end on the third December 31 next following the date of this Agreement (as the same may be extended pursuant to this paragraph, the “Period of
Employment”). If written election not to renew by either party is not received by the other party by (a) November 1 of the year of the effective date of this Agreement, or (b) November 1 any subsequent year, if this Agreement has previously
been extended pursuant to this paragraph 3, then the Period of Employment will be automatically extended by one year. 
  
 2. As so amended, said Employment Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed. 






 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and intending to be legally bound, the parties have executed this First Amendment as
of the 18th day of January, 2005. 
  

									
	 	 	 	 	SUSQUEHANNA BANCSHARES, INC.	 	 
					
	Attest:	 	 /s/ James H. Foster

	 	By:	 	 /s/ Edward Balderston, Jr.

	 	 
	 	 	Assistant Secretary	 	 	 	Executive Vice President	 	 
				
	 	 	 	 	VALLEY FORGE ASSET MANAGEMENT CORP.	 	 
					
	Attest:	 	 /s/ Kelly C. Malloy

	 	By:	 	 /s/ James E. Gibson

	 	 
	 	 	Secretary	 	 	 	Chief Operating Officer	 	 
				
	 	 	 	 	EMPLOYEE	 	 
					
	Witness:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 /s/ Kelly C. Malloy

	 	 	 	 /s/ Bernard A. Francis, Jr.

	 	(Seal)