alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011139EN.01002202.xml

| 7.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/22

---

Action brought on 18 February 2011 — ASA v OHIM — Merck (FEMIFERAL)

(Case T-110/11)

2011/C 139/42

Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ASA Sp. z o.o. (Głubczyce, Poland) (represented by: M. Chimiak, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Merck Sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | set aside in its entirety the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 November 2010 in Case No R 0182/2010-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside in its entirety the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 19 November 2010 in Case No R 0182/2010-1;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘FEMIFERAL’ for goods in Class 5 — Application No 5320701

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Merck Sp. z o.o.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the national word mark ‘Feminatal’ and the national figurative mark containing the word element ‘feminatal’ for goods in Class 5.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: dismissal of the opposition.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: invalidation of the decision of the Opposition Division and dismissal of the application for the trade mark in its entirety.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Breach of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (1) by reason of the erroneous finding that the trade marks ‘Feminatal’ and ‘FEMIFERAL’ are similar to one another in a manner which is likely to mislead Polish consumers as to the origin of the goods, by reason of the misappraisal of the distinctive character of the prefix ‘femi’ and lack of regard for characteristics specific to Polish consumers and also the principles of the Polish language, as also by reason of the defective assessment of the similarity of the marks in all three aspects: visual, phonetic and conceptual.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (codified version) (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2337 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2337

 To direct the Secretary of Transportation to make grants for certain 
  transportation feasibility studies for southern New Mexico and west 
                                 Texas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2009

 Mr. Teague (for himself and Mr. Reyes) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Transportation to make grants for certain 
  transportation feasibility studies for southern New Mexico and west 
                                 Texas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Southwestern Transit Corridor 
Planning and Fuel Use Reduction Act''.

SEC. 2. RAIL RUNNER EXTENSION FEASIBILITY STUDY.

    The Secretary of Transportation shall make a grant to the New 
Mexico Mid Region Council of Governments to conduct, working in 
cooperation with the appropriate municipalities, metropolitan planning 
organizations, and rural planning organizations in New Mexico and 
Texas, a transportation corridor feasibility study to evaluate and 
provide recommendations regarding the costs, benefits, obstacles, 
impacts and feasibility of various transit technology, alignments, and 
funding options for extending the New Mexico rail runner express 
commuter rail service south from Belen, New Mexico, to El Paso, Texas, 
or to intermediate points.

SEC. 3. LAS CRUCES AND EL PASO FEASIBILITY STUDY.

    The Secretary of Transportation shall make a grant to the city of 
Las Cruces, New Mexico, and the city of El Paso, Texas, to conduct, in 
cooperation with the Las Cruces metropolitan planning organization and 
the El Paso metropolitan planning organization, a transportation 
corridor feasibility study to evaluate and provide recommendations 
regarding the costs, benefits, obstacles, impacts, and feasibility of 
various transit technology, alignments, and funding options for a 
public transit system, including the option of commuter rail, that 
would connect Las Cruces and El Paso.

SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555

July 16, 2002

NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2002-23: UNAUTHORIZED ADMINISTRATION OF 

 BYPRODUCT MATERIAL FOR MEDICAL USE

Addressees:

All medical licensees. 

Purpose:

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice (IN) to

remind licensees of the importance of appropriate authorization before administration of

byproduct material for medical use. It is expected that recipients will review this information for

applicability to their licensed activities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar

problems. However, suggestions contained in this IN are not new NRC requirements;

therefore, no specific action nor written response is required.

Description of Circumstances:

Over the past year, NRC has become aware of cases involving the deliberate unauthorized

administration of licensed material to humans. For example, on April 26, 2001, a nuclear

medicine technologist deliberately administered an unauthorized dose of technetium-99m

tagged methylene diphosphonate to a student. The student requested the administration of the

licensed material for a bone scan. The technologist performed the bone scan without prior

authorization from a physician. 

Discussion:

The regulations of 10 CFR Part 35 provide that only an authorized user physician, or someone

under the supervision of an authorized user, may administer licensed material for medical uses. 

In the case described above, the nuclear medicine technologist administered licensed material

without the approval of an authorized user. Such action by the technologist resulted in an

unnecessary radiation dose to the individual.

NRC expects licensees to ensure that their staff, including nuclear medicine technologists, and

other persons supervised by physicians, fully understand and adhere to the requirements

associated with the medical administration of licensed material. NRC will consider enforcement

actions for both licensees and their staff when NRC requirements are knowingly violated, as in

the case described above. 

ML021900592
IN 2002-23

Page 2 of 2

This IN notice requires no specific action nor written response. If you have any questions about

the information in this notice, please contact the technical contact listed below or the

appropriate regional office.

/RA/

Donald A. Cool, Director

Division of Industrial and 

 Medical Nuclear Safety

Office of Nuclear Material Safety

 and Safeguards

Attachments:

1. List of Recently Issued NMSS Information Notices

2. List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices 

Technical Contact: Anita L. Turner, Ph.D., NMSS

 (301) 415-5508

 E-mail: alt@nrc.gov
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 1 - 0 623 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. BRANDON JEROME LAMBRIGHT ,

Defendant and Appellant,

ORDER Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 6, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s Opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 31 2023

03/31/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0623
Order filed December 4, 2014

In The 

### Court of Appeals
For The 

### First District of Texas

___________ NO. 01
- 14
- 00182
- CR

____________ WARIS NADIR SUBLET , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 262nd Distr ict Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1378742



### ORDERThis court has determined, pursuant to T exas Rule of Appellate Procedure

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of Defendant ’ s Exhibit #45 and Defendant ’ s Exhibit #45

- A . The exhibit clerk of the 262nd District Court is di rected to deliver to the Clerk of this court the original of Defendant ’ s Exhibit #45 and Defendant ’ s Exhibit #45

- A , on or before December 9, 2014 . The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon complet ion of inspection, to return the original of Defendant ’ s Exhibit #45 and Defendant ’ s Exhibit #45

- A , to the clerk of the 262nd District Court.

PER CURIAM
#### § 169.259 Limitations of inspections.

The OCMI may require that a vessel and its equipment meet any test or inspection deemed necessary to determine that they are suitable for the service in which they are to be employed.
# C_2015228EN.01002501.xml

| 13.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/25

---

Order of the General Court of 21 May 2015 — Stichting Greenpeace Nederland and PAN Europe v Commission

(Case T-232/11) (1)

1

(2015/C 228/30)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 194, 2.7.2011.

1

---
----

Exhibit 13.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the annual report of Birch MountainResources Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report"), I, Douglas J. Rowe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

Date: April 4, 2007 

|   |   | */s/ Douglas J. Rowe*                                             |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | **Name: Douglas J. Rowe**                                         |
|   |   | Title:    President and    Chief Executive Officer |
# C_2012025EN.01003502.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/35

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Comercial Cluj (Romania) lodged on 14 November 2011 — SC Volksbank România SA v Andreia Câmpan and Ioan Dan Câmpan

(Case C-571/11)

(2012/C 25/68)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Comercial Cluj

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SC Volksbank România SA

Defendants: Andreia Câmpan and Ioan Dan Câmpan

Question referred

Having regard to the fact that, in accordance with Article 4(2) of Directive 93/13/EEC, (1) assessment of the unfair nature of contractual terms must relate neither to the definition of the main subject-matter of the contract nor to the adequacy of the price and remuneration, on the one hand, as against the services or goods supplied in exchange, on the other, in so far as these terms are in plain intelligible language,

and

given that, under Article 2(2)(a) of Directive 2008/48/EC, (2) the definition provided in Article 3(g) of that directive of ‘the total cost of the credit to the consumer’, which includes all the fees which the consumer is required to pay in connection with the credit agreement, does not apply for the purposes of determining the subject-matter of a credit agreement secured by a mortgage,

can the concepts of ‘subject-matter’ and/or of ‘price’, as used in Article 4(2) of Directive 93/13/EEC, be interpreted as meaning that a fee referred to by the parties as a ‘risk commission’, which is provided for under a credit agreement secured by a mortgage and which is calculated on the basis of ‘0.22% of the credit balance’ and payable monthly, throughout the entire period of validity of the credit agreement, on pre-determined repayment dates falls within the ‘subject-matter’ and/or ‘price’ of the credit agreement secured by mortgage?

---

(1)  Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29)

(2)  Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC (OJ 2008 L 133, p. 66)

---
<PAGE> 1



                                  Exhibit 10.4

              Employment Agreement between David P. Marchetti, Sr.
                  and Security Savings Association of Hazleton

                                                        

<PAGE> 2



Exhibit 10.4

         Mr.  Marchetti's  Employment  Agreement  is the same as the  Employment
Agreement in Exhibit 10.3,  which is incorporated  herein by reference except as
to:  (i) the  name of the  signatory,  which is  David  P.  Marchetti;  (ii) the
position  in Section 1, which is Vice  President  and Chief  Operating  Officer;
(iii) the signatory for the Association,  which is Richard C. Laubach;  (iv) the
guarantor for the Company,  which is Richard C.  Laubach;  and (v) the amount of
the base salary in Section 3(a), which is $75,000.
# C_2012058EN.01001001.xml

| 25.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/10

---

Order of the General Court of 11 January 2012 — Ben Ali v Council

(Case T-301/11) (1)

1

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in the light of the situation in Tunisia - Action for annulment - Time-limit for bringing proceedings - Out of time - No force majeure - No excusable error - Application for alteration of the contested measure - Claim for compensation - Manifest inadmissibility)

2012/C 58/18

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mehdi Ben Tijani Ben Haj Hamda Ben Haj Hassen Ben Ali (Tunis, Tunisia) (represented by: A. de Saint Remy, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented initially by A. Vitro and R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro, and subsequently by R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro and M. Bishop, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

First, action for annulment of Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 of 4 February 2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia (OJ 2011 L 31, p. 1), in so far as it concerns the applicant and, second, an application seeking an order for the Council to adopt certain derogations to the freezing of funds imposed by the regulation and a claim for damages for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The order is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The order is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Mehdi Ben Tijani Ben Haj Hamda Ben Haj Hassen Ben Ali is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Mehdi Ben Tijani Ben Haj Hamda Ben Haj Hassen Ben Ali is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

| 3. | There is no need to give a ruling on the application for leave to intervene by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

There is no need to give a ruling on the application for leave to intervene by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 226, 30.7.2011.

1

---
- 4520
- 4521
- 4522
- 4523
- 4524
- 4525
- 4526
- 4527
- 4528
- 4529
- 4530
- 4531
- 4532
- 4533
- 4534
- 4535
- 4536
- 4537
- 4538
- 4539
- 4540
- 4541
- 4542
- 4543
- 4544
- 4545
- 4546
- 4547
- 4548
- 4549
- 4550
- 4551
- 4552
- 4553
- 4554
- 4555
- 4556
- 4557
- 4558
- 4559
- 4560
- 4561
- 4562
- 4563
- 4564
- 4565
- 4566
- 4567
- 4568
- 4569
§ 119.320 Water heaters. ( a ) A water heater must meet the requirements of Parts 53 and 63 in subchapter F of this chapter if rated at not more than 689 kPa (100 psig) and 121 °C (250 °F), except that an electric water heater is also acceptable if it: ( 1 ) Has a capacity of not more than 454 liters (120 gallons):
( 2 ) Has a heat input of not more than 58.6 kilowatts (200,000 Btu per hour);
( 3 ) Is listed by Underwriters Laboratories (UL) under UL 174, “Household Electric Storage Tank Water Heaters,” UL 1453, “Electric Booster and Commercial Storage Tank Water Heaters,” or other standard specified by the Commandant; and
( 4 ) Is protected by a pressure-temperature relief device.
( b ) A water heater must meet the requirements of Parts 52 and 63 in subchapter F of this chapter if rated at more than 689 kPa (100 psig) or 121 °C (250 °F).
( c ) A water heater must be installed and secured from rolling by straps or other devices to the satisfaction of the cognizant OCMI.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 922, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51352, Sept. 30, 1997]
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, Robert S.Herlin, President and Chief Executive Officer of Evolution PetroleumCorporation (the “Company”), certifies in connection with the filing with theSecurities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tohis knowledge, that:

 

1. The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this certification as of the 27th day ofSeptember, 2010.

 
|   | /s/  ROBERT S. HERLIN                  |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Robert  S. Herlin                      |
|   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EvolutionPetroleum Corporation and will be retained by Evolution Petroleum Corporationand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.  The foregoing certificate isbeing furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to thisForm 10-K and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-K.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 11 (Thursday, January 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-143]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Availability for Non-Exclusive, Exclusive, or Partially Exclusive 
Licensing of U.S. Patent Concerning Advanced Video Controller System

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6 and 404.7, announcement is 
made of the availability for licensing of the invention set forth in 
U.S. Patent Application No. 11/313,050 entitled ``Advanced Video 
Controller System,'' filed on December 20, 2005. Foreign rights are 
also available. The United States Government, as represented by the 
Secretary of the Army, has rights in this invention.

ADDRESSES: Commander, U.S. Army Research Development and Engineering 
Command, ATTN: AMSRD-AMR-AS-PT-TR, Bldg 5400, Redstone Arsenal, AL 
358989-5000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For patent issues, Mr. George 
Winborne, Patent Attorney, (256) 955-8118. For licensing issues, Dr. 
Russ Alexander, Office of Research & Technology Applications, (256) 
955-6018.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The present invention pertains to a video 
game control system where the actual physical motion and orientation of 
a player is automatically replicated and appreciated in a video 
environment.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-143 Filed 1-17-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Matria Healthcare, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-72516, 333-72512, 333-69347, 333-42856, 333-02283, 333-01883 and 333-01539)
on Form S-8 of Matria Healthcare, Inc. of our report dated February 15, 2002,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Matria Healthcare, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, common shareholders' equity and comprehensive
earnings, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2001, and the related financial statement schedule, which report
appears in the 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Matria Healthcare, Inc.


                                                                  KPMG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 28, 2002
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Independent auditors� report onU.S. Customs and Border Protection�s FY ... consolidated financial statements**
 
SuDoc Number:HS 1.22/4:

Item Number:0520-B-37 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000857006
 
2009 | 2010 | 2011| 2012 | 2013 | 2014| 2015 | 2016
 
March 19, 2020