alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2062 

AN ACT 

To amend the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to provide for 

penalties and enforcement for intentionally taking protected avian species, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2062 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Migratory Bird Treaty 

3 Act Penalty and Enforcement Act of 2009’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT OF MIGRATORY BIRD TREATY ACT. 

5 Section 6 of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 707) is amended by redesignating subsection (d) 

7 as subsection (e), and by inserting after subsection (c) the 

8 following new subsection: 

9 ‘‘(d)(1) Except in the case of hunting and other activ10 ity allowed under section 3, whoever in violation of this 

11 Act kills or wounds a migratory bird in an aggravated 

12 manner shall, in lieu of any penalty for such violation— 

13 ‘‘(A) for the first violation, be fined under title 

14 18, United States Code, imprisoned for not more 

15 than one year, or both; and 

16 ‘‘(B) for the second and any subsequent viola17 tion, be fined under title 18 of the United States 

18 Code, imprisoned for not more than 2 years, or both. 

19 ‘‘(2) The authority under section 3(k) of the Fish and 

20 Wildlife Improvement Act of 1978 (16 U.S.C. 742l(k)) ap21 plies with respect to a violation described in paragraph 

22 (1). 

23 ‘‘(3) For the purposes of this subsection the term ‘ag24 gravated manner’ means deliberately and in a manner 

25 that— 
3 

•HR 2062 EH

1 ‘‘(A) demonstrates indifference to the pain and 

2 suffering of the bird; or 

3 ‘‘(B) involves actions that would shock a rea4 sonable person.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 7, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2062 

AN ACT 

To amend the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to proother purposes. tionally taking protected avian species, and for vide for penalties and enforcement for inten-
- 2722
- 2723
- 2724
EXHIBIT 32



     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I,  Carey  G.  Birmingham,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly  Report  of  International  Test  Systems, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the
fiscal  quarter  ended  March  31,  2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934 and that
information  contained  in  such  Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of International Test
Systems,  Inc.

 Date: September 8, 2006

                                        By: /s/ Carey G. Birmingham
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Carey G. Birmingham,
                                            Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Principal Accounting Officer

<PAGE>
# C_2012157EN.01001203.xml

| 2.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 157/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 157/12

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 20 March 2012 — Schönberger v Parliament

(Case F-65/11) (1)

1

2012/C 157/22

Language of the case: German

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register, following amicable settlement.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 27.8.2011, p. 57.

1

---
<PAGE>   1
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Applied Graphics Technologies, Inc. on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-32121)
and on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-25059) of our report dated March 8, 1996
on our audits of the combined financial statements of the Predecessor Group to
Applied Graphics Technologies Inc. as of December 31, 1995 and for each of the
two years in the period ended December 31, 1995, which report is included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-KA.


                                         Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

                                         Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


New York, New York
August 27, 1997
G-17(A) Account-Opening Model Form

Interest Rates and Interest Charges 

Annual Percentage Rate 

(APR) for Purchases 

[Purchase rate] 

[Description that rate varies and how it is determined, if applicable] 

APR for Balance Transfers [Balance transfer rate] 

[Description that rate varies and how it is determined, if applicable] 

APR for Cash Advances [Cash advance rate] 

[Description that rate varies and how it is determined, if applicable] 

Penalty APR and When it 

Applies 

[Penalty rate] 

[Description of events that may result in the penalty rate] 

[Description of how long penalty rate may apply] 

[How to Avoid Paying 

Interest]/[Paying Interest] 

[Description of grace period for purchases, cash advances, balance transfers, or any 

other credit extended or statement that no grace period applies] 

[Minimum Interest 

Charge]/[Minimum 

Charge] 

[Description of minimum interest charge or minimum charge, if applicable] 

For Credit Card Tips from 

the Federal Reserve 

Board 

[Reference to Board’s website] 

Fees 

[Annual Fee]/[Set-up and 

Maintenance Fees] 

[Notice of available credit, if applicable] 

[Notice of right to reject plan, if applicable] 

[Description of fees for availability or issuance of credit, such as an annual fee, if 

applicable] 

Transaction Fees 

 Balance Transfer [Description of balance transfer fee] 

 Cash Advance [Description of cash advance fee] 

 Foreign Transaction [Description of foreign transaction fee] 

Penalty Fees 

 Late Payment [Description of late payment fee] 

 Over-the-Credit Limit [Description of over-the-credit limit fee] 

 Returned Payment [Description of returned payment fee] 

Other Fees 

 Required [insert name 

of required insurance, 

or debt cancellation or 

suspension coverage] 

[Description of cost of insurance, or debt cancellation or suspension plans] [Cross 

reference to additional information, if applicable] 

How We Will Calculate Your Balance: [Description of balance computation method] 

Loss of Introductory APR: [Circumstances in which introductory rate may be revoked and rate that applies if introductory 

 rate is revoked, if applicable] 

[Description that rate that applies after introductory rate is revoked varies and how it is 

determined, if applicable] 

Billing Rights: [Reference to account agreement for details on billing-error rights]
Home 
| Surveys
| OSS 
Accessibility | Contact Us

Last update: February 17, 2009
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 15-cr-20089-1 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

LAMHAL MOSES BELL, 

 Defendant. 

________________________________________________________________/ 

REVISED ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION REQUESTING A 

JUDICIAL RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING LENGTH OF 

RRC/HALFWAY HOUSE PLACEMENT (ECF No. 173)1

 On May 6, 2015, Defendant Lamhal Moses Bell pleaded guilty to three 

offenses: a Hobbs Act robbery on January 18, 2015, using a firearm during and in 

relation to a crime of violence (his Hobbs Act robbery on January 18, 2015), and a 

Hobbs Act robbery on February 1, 2015. (See Rule 11 Plea Agreement, ECF No. 55, 

PageID.136; Judgment, ECF No. 104, PageID.614.) Bell’s sentencing guidelines 

range was 141 to 155 months imprisonment. (See Rule 11 Plea Agreement, ECF No. 

55, PageID.138, 150.) On December 15, 2015, this Court sentenced Bell to 114 

months imprisonment: 30 months for each Hobbs Act robbery offense, to be served 

1

 This order corrects typographical errors in the Court’s initial order denying Bell’s 

motion. (See Order, ECF No. 175.) On page two of that order, the Court mistakenly 

referred to Bell as “Hobbs.” The Court has corrected that error in this revised order. 
2 

concurrently; and 84 months for using a firearm during and in relation to the first 

Hobbs Act robbery offense, to be served consecutively to his robbery counts. (See 

Judgment, ECF No. 104, PageID.614–615.) 

 On March 16, 2021, Bell filed a motion in which he requested that the Court 

recommend to the Bureau of Prisons that he be placed in a residential re-entry and/or 

halfway house 12 months prior to the end of his sentence. (See Mot., ECF No. 173.) 

Bell filed a similar motion less than a year ago, and the Court denied that motion in 

a written order. (See Order, ECF No. 168.) For all of the same reasons that the Court 

denied Bell’s initial motion for a recommendation, Bell’s current motion is 

DENIED. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: June 2, 2021 

 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on June 2, 2021, by electronic means and/or ordinary 

mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (810) 341-9761
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, David J. Kornder, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Patina Oil & Gas Corporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 9, 2004
# C_2011252EN.01005603.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/56

---

Action brought on 9 May 2011 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-55/11)

2011/C 252/125

Language of the cse: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the dispute

Subject-matter and description of the dispute

Annulment of the Commission’s decision to reduce the education allowance paid to the applicant by reason of the fact that his son receives financial aid from a Member State in the form of a bursary and a loan.

Forms of order sought

Forms of order sought

| — | Annul the decision to reduce the ‘education allowance’ paid to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision to reduce the ‘education allowance’ paid to the applicant;

| — | annul the decision concerning the retrospective retention of EUR 939,96, as shown by the applicant’s pay slip for October 2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision concerning the retrospective retention of EUR 939,96, as shown by the applicant’s pay slip for October 2010;

| — | annul the decision concerning the retrospective retention of EUR 936,96, as shown by the applicant’s pay slip for November 2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision concerning the retrospective retention of EUR 936,96, as shown by the applicant’s pay slip for November 2010;

| — | annul the Commission’s decision of 17 February 2011 expressly dismissing the complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission’s decision of 17 February 2011 expressly dismissing the complaint;

| — | repay to the applicant, with interest, the sums withheld from him; |
| --- | --- |

—

repay to the applicant, with interest, the sums withheld from him;

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
§ 169.738 Emergency lights. Each emergency light must be marked with a letter “E” at least 1 ⁄ 2 inch high.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

REBECCA ROMERO

, Appellant,

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS CWALT, INC.,
ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2007

- HY4, MORTGAGE PASS

- THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007

- HY4, Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 2

- 786

[ December 22, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fif t eenth Judic ial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Janis Brustares Keyser , Judge; L.T. Case No.

5020 14008738.

Gregory Light of Light & Gonzalez, PLLC, Plantation, for appellant.

Dariel Abrahamy of Greenspoon Marder LLP, Boca Raton, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS
, L EVINE an d C ONNER
, JJ

. , concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**EXHIBIT ITEM32.2**

SECTION 906CERTIFICATION

Thecertification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities and ExchangeCommission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code.

March22, 2007

BruceN. Warner, the Chief Financial Officer of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.certifies:

c.               that thisperiodic report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

d.              thatinformation contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of NorthernCalifornia Bancorp, Inc.

 

 
|        | /s/ Bruce N. Warner          |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   | Bruce N. Warner              |
|   | Chief Financial Officer and  |
|   | Principal Accounting Officer |

 

----
# C_2011130EN.01001502.xml

| 30.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/15

---

Action brought on 22 February 2011 — American Express Marketing & Development v OHIM (IP ZONE)

(Case T-102/11)

2011/C 130/27

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: American Express Marketing & Development Corp. (New York, United States) (represented by: V. Spitz, A. Gaul, T. Golda and S. Kirschstein-Freund, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 December 2010 in case R 1125/2010-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 December 2010 in case R 1125/2010-2;

| — | In the alternative, amend the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 December 2010 in case R 1125/2010-2, and rule that the appeal is justified; |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative, amend the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 December 2010 in case R 1125/2010-2, and rule that the appeal is justified;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings and of the proceedings before the Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings and of the proceedings before the Court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘IP ZONE’ for services in class 42

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Refused the application for a Community trade mark

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal found that the trade mark lacks the necessary distinctiveness and is descriptive with respect to the services in question.

Pleas in law:

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7653

OTAGWYN BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DR. MICHAEL JONES,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. 

(1:13-cv-02211-ELH)

Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 26, 2014

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Otagwyn Brown, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Otagwyn Brown appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Brown v. Jones, No. 1:13-cv-02211-ELH 

(D. Md. Sept. 3, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 169.203 Description.

The certificate of inspection issued to a vessel describes the vessel, the route which it may travel, the minimum manning requirements, the major lifesaving equipment carried, the minimum fire extinguishing equipment and life preservers required to be carried, the maximum number of sailing school students and instructors and the maximum number of persons which may be carried, the name of the owner and operator, and such conditions of operations as may be determined by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2009 

To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 to permit 

immediate repayment of direct capital investments received under the 

Troubled Asset Relief Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2009 

Mr. MCCLINTOCK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 

2008 to permit immediate repayment of direct capital 

investments received under the Troubled Asset Relief 

Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RIGHT OF REPAYMENT UNDER TARP. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title I of the Emergency Eco5 nomic Stabilization Act of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5201 et seq.) 

6 is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 


smartinez on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2009 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 137. RIGHT OF REPAYMENT. 

2 ‘‘Any financial institution that has received or re3 ceives a direct capital investment under this title shall, 

4 notwithstanding any other provision of law or any agree5 ment made by such institution, have the right to imme6 diately repay such direct capital investment, and the Sec7 retary shall unconditionally accept such a payment.’’. 

8 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of con9 tents for such Act is amended by inserting after the item 

10 relating to section 136 the following new item: 

‘‘137. Right of repayment.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
p.1 

OAR Box 1778 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

173) ll-E-24 

Docket Number: 

A-90-06 

Printed 10/28/2008 9:50:59 AM Sheet 173 of 276 
CONVERSATION RE 

TYPE 

• VISIT 

Location of Vitlt/Conftr«ne«: 

II-E-24 '//*/•?? 

« • •4..i.rnvnc 

Q INCOMINa 

'OUTQOINQ 

NAME OF PCRSONOl CONTACTED Of. IN CONTACT 

*•"« " /ttayF- j*t* iv-W rc, 

j ORGANIZATION (OIHce, dent., bureau, j TELEPHONE NO. 

SUBJECT 

_V/€.'f'C-6; • fpyX W^L-tt W 

ROUTII 

NAME/SVMBt 

Ji' 

Y.<_vt=-li* 

Vt*v Altrxk 

O.i J*** c 

SUMMARY 

-OfiZ£__ 

ILc-J&ttX V E P*^ lo**k in r*mJoWi~ A° "tU. r /•«{ u^ f 

p yt?v.*&& _t^. o JX\ i rA c "i \ -*• J 'X-J /Cay*..*, rn / w<^ wa^vsX ^ A o J f j ^j * _d_ j ; /i ' 

J L ajpgji,, w £ ('Co *V v zjoerrX t f .' 

U l w i "h i ' . f1*" -'Oo.<_ l',« ti/>:T . ^ . . 

^*'J *• ' l,)fl.i..U,l .(^l i|>„/r<'rn-,ii,4-l 

•set; :b*vi<|i»>i • lirn. Tf ? , " 1 -

>> 

I**!** * )' H ( 

-N^-.^.W V Y-cvXi*l»»* 0 ""•. ViX>(A. • . r 

<-j %'X*-as~y d <UsWi OrtJJ'V* r < <_KCt*-A.ayi<,«tJ' 

*i f J L j'Tftf'tjiwi rt^ni^—SJatih, r 

" ~ j « / hijiiH-. w +0A Y*J *XT *» ?*Arur\ -«W«r« , P/*> i.' rHr t 

CUrt ? -

d ) Opa** t y v/i*»l odtit>T-_* e| u «-.'>« 3 rJi f/iA i .. 1 ri*rv »r l cj n v i *M S""<*lftw H&**<mA} 

r 1 ea^n p, y ^|^>. pr*4f Ul> < t^t^^ y 

_)Jnr.n ; i/t'-^X*TJ ,-*t rv^f-rff/ry) - ?«*"*' C r^nJ" i it r utj't<_»Jti'*»»iL- v * •(** . enr. - '/ 

r<r(>y>X >=> 1U_ "r^u^v^'-Y f J*/ i 

y) Wi*Vl *i>* OC-aJTs- *7i^|-rf^«Xorv./ v«j>uL^'t" \v» Qj*f<r.n\y (*&*\sii>>rKp) ) v7<:r*^y»^ . 

ACTION REQUIRED 

NAME OF PERSON OOCUMCNTINO C0NVER3A 

ACTION TAKEN 

A.x 

SIONATURe k"X \ TITLE 

90371-101 .< u.__»PO IMS •4*l-J75/;0Z02 CONVERSATION RECORD oim«mofr or eiram