alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.491 Waiver of certain equipment for dedicated cargo tanks. ( a ) The Coast Guard waives §§ 153.440(a)(3), 153.480, 153.481, 153.482, and 153.488 and endorses a ship's Certificate of Inspection or Certificate of Compliance allowing a cargo tank to carry a single, specific NLS cargo and no other cargo if the ship's owner— ( 1 ) Requests a waiver following the procedures in § 153.10; and
( 2 ) Pledges in writing that while any waiver is in effect the cargo tank will— ( i ) Carry only the NLS cargo listed on the Certificate of Inspection or Certificate of Compliance;
( ii ) Carry no cargo other than the NLS; and
( iii ) Not be washed or ballasted unless the wash water or ballast water is discharged to a reception facility.
( b ) The Coast Guard waives §§ 153.470 and 153.490(a)(2) if— ( 1 ) The ship's owner requests a waiver following the procedures in § 153.10;
( 2 ) The Coast Guard has issued a waiver to each of the ship's NLS cargo tanks under paragraph (a) of this section; and
( 3 ) The ship's owner adds to the ship's operational manual any provisions for preventing NLS discharge specified by the Commandant (CG-ENG) as a condition for issuing the waiver.
[CGD 81-101, 52 FR 7781, Mar. 12, 1987, as amended by CGD 81-101, 53 FR 28975, Aug. 1, 1988 and 54 FR 12629, Mar. 28, 1989]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the amended  Quarterly  Report of Natural  Nutrition,  Inc.,
formerly CSI Business  Finance,  Inc.,  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the
quarterly  period  ended  September  30, 2006 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the
capacities  and on the date indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date:   November 29, 2006               By:     /s/ Timothy J Connolly
                                                --------------------------
                                        Name:   Timothy J Connolly
                                        Title:  Chief Executive Officer

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authentications,   acknowledging,  or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2010128EN.01014701.xml

| 18.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 128/147 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 128/147

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network’

(Recast)

COM(2009) 391 final — 2009/0110 (COD)

(2010/C 128/28)

On 11 September 2009, the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 156 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the

Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network (Recast)

Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network (Recast)

COM(2009) 391 final – 2009/0110 (COD).

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided unanimously, at its 457th plenary session of 4 and 5 November 2009 (meeting of 4 November) to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 4 November 2009

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Mario SEPI

---
#### § 122.614 Portable watertight containers for distress flares and smoke signals.

Portable watertight containers for distress flares and smoke signals shall be of a bright color, and containers shall be clearly marked in legible contrasting letters at least 12.7 millimeters (0.5 inches) high: “DISTRESS SIGNALS”.
§ 133.170 Line-throwing appliance. ( a ) *General.* Each OSV must have a line-throwing appliance that is approved under approval series 160.031 or 160.040.
( b ) *Stowage.* The line-throwing appliance and its equipment must be readily accessible for use.
( c ) *Additional equipment.* Each OSV must carry the following equipment for the line-throwing appliance: ( 1 ) The equipment on the list provided by the manufacturer with the approved appliance.
( 2 ) An auxiliary line that— ( i ) For an appliance approved under approval series 160.040, is at least 450 meters (1,500 feet) long;
( ii ) For an appliance approved under approval series 160.031, is at least 150 meters (500 feet) long;
( iii ) Has a breaking strength of at least 40 kiloNewtons (9,000 pounds-force); and
( iv ) Is, if synthetic, a dark color or certified by the manufacturer to be resistant to deterioration from ultraviolet light.
#### Richmond Putnam, *Respondent, v.*Alphonso Matthewson and another, *Appellant*.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered before another referee, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.
| | CERTIFICATION | EXHIBIT 31.2
| | ------------- | ------------

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

|I, Barry L. Lazarus, certify that:
|----------------------------------
|                                  
|1.                                
|                                  
|2.                                
|                                  
|3.                                
|                                  
|4.                                
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|5.                                
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  
|                                  



|Date: | May 7August 7, 2004    
|----- | -----------------------
|      |                        
|      | /s/ BARRY L. LAZARUS   
|      |                        
|By:   | Barry L. Lazarus       
|      | Chief Financial Officer
# C_2012006EN.01001702.xml

| 7.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/17

---

Order of the General Court of 9 November 2011 — Glaxo Group v OHIM — Farmodiética (ADVANCE)

(Case T-243/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Applicant represented by a lawyer who is a not a third person - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 6/32

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Glaxo Group Ltd (Greenford, United Kingdom) (represented by: O. Benito and C. Mansell, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Farmodiética — Cosmética, Dietética e Produtos Farmacêuticos, Lda (Estarda de S. Marcos, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

da

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 February 2011 (Case R 665/2010-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Farmodiética — Cosmética, Dietética e Produtos Farmacêuticos, Lda and Glaxo Group Ltd.

da

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Glaxo Group Ltd shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Glaxo Group Ltd shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 194, 2.7.2011.

1

---
Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Reply Brief Page 1 No. 07-15-00128-CV

___________________________________________________
LE NGUYEN, Appellant

v.

ELENA LOPEZ, Individually and as of Represen tative of and on behalf of THE ESTATE OF JEANETTE LOPEZ and CARISTINA AND MIGUEL LE RMA, Individually and on behalf of BERNICE LERMA, a minor, and on behalf of all known heirs;

Appellees

___________________________________________________
APPELLANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF

___________________________________________________
TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

LE NGUYEN, Appellant, moves this Court to gran t an extension of time to file her Reply

Brief to the Appellee’s Brief, and respectfully states:

1. Le Nguyen’s Reply Brief is due to be filed with this Court on August 31, 2015,

which is prior to submission on September 1, 2015.

2. Le Nguyen seeks an extension of ti me until Tuesday, September 8, 2015, to file

her Reply Brief, and a similar extension fo r submission of the case until Wednesday,

September 9, 2015.

3. This extension of time is necessary because counsel for Nguyen has scheduling

conflicts in other proceedings wh ich have delayed preparation of the reply brief. No previous

extension has been requested by Appellant Nguyen for filing the reply brief.

4. Counsel for Appellee does not oppose this request for extension. ACCEPTED 07-15-00128-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS

AMARILLO, TEXAS 8/31/2015 6:23:29 PM Vivian Long, ClerkAppellant’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Reply Brief Page 2 For these reasons, Appellant, LE NGUYEN, request s that this Court grant an extension of

time for Appellant to File her Reply Brief unt il September 8, 2015, and to extend the date for

submission of the case until September 9, 2015, together with any other relief to which she may

be entitled.

Dated: August 31, 2015. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Joyce W. Lindauer Joyce W. Lindauer State Bar No. 21555700 Joyce Lindauer, PLLC 12720 Hillcrest Suite 625 Dallas, TX 75230 Telephone (972) 503-4033 Fax (972) 503-4034 Joyce@joycelindauer.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Joyce W. Lindauer, certify that a true copy of the foregoing pleading was served upon the following, on the 31 st day of August, 2015:

Charles Chad Baruch The Law Office of Chad Baruch 3201 Main Street Rowlett, Texas 75088

R. Douglass Scott Law Office of Craig Zimmerman 3901 Arlington Heights Blvd., Suite 200 Arlington, Texas 76018 Mohammad Said Modjarrad Abusaad & Said Law Firm 212 West Spring Valley Road Richardson, TX 75081

Annette Loyd Vanicek 4528 W. Vickery Blvd., Suite 202 Fort Worth, TX 76107

/s/ Joyce W. Lindauer Joyce W. Lindauer
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation of our reports dated May 6, 1997, on our audits
of the consolidated financial statements of Workgroup Technology Corporation as
of March 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the years ended March 31, 1997, 1996 and
1995 which reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8, File Nos. 333-
09161 and 333-11869.



                                            COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Boston, Massachusetts
June 27, 1997
|                                                                     |   | Years Ended October 31, |      |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|-----------|
|                                                                     |   | 2010                    |      |   | 2009 |   |
| Net income (loss)                                                        |   | $                       | 2,389,361 |   |   | $ | 3,291,066 |   |
|                                                                     |   |                    |      |   |   |   |   |   |
| BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS):                                                   |   |                    |      |   |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                     |   |                    | 5,463,837 |   |   |   | 5,441,462 |   |
|                                                                     |   |                    |      |   |   |   |   |   |
| Basic earnings (loss) per common share                                   |   | $                       | .44       |   |   | $ | .60 |   |
|                                                                     |   |                    |      |   |   |   |   |   |
| DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS):                                                 |   |                    |      |   |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                     |   |                    | 5,463,837 |   |   |   | 5,441,462 |   |
| Contingent shares – common stock equivalents                       |   |                    | 10,000    |   |   |   | - |   |
|                                                                     |   |                    |      |   |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – as adjusted |   |                    | 5,468,439 |   |   |   | 5,441,462 |   |
|                                                                     |   |                    |      |   |   |   |   |   |
| Diluted earnings (loss) per common share                                 |   | $                       | .44       |   |   | $ | .60 |   |
###### Editorial Note on Part 153

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 153.1112 Prewash for tanks containing Category A NLS residue.

Unless § 153.1114 allows the prewash to be omitted, a cargo tank that unloads a Category A NLS cargo must be prewashed following the procedures in § 153.1120.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Housing Finance Board

# Time and Date:

The open meeting of the Board of Directors is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. on Tuesday, March 27, 2007. The closed portion of the meeting will follow immediately the open portion of the meeting. 

# Place:

Board Room, First Floor, Federal Housing Finance Board, 1625 Eye Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006. 

# Status:

The first portion of the meeting will be open to the public. The final portion of the meeting will be closed to the public. 

# Matters to be Considered at the Open Portion:

Final Rule: Federal Home Loan Bank Appointive Directors. 

Proposed Rule: Financial Interests of Appointive Directors. 

# Matter to be Considered at the Closed Portion:

Periodic Update of Examination Program Development and Supervisory Findings. 

# Contact Person for More Information:

                        Shelia Willis, Paralegal Specialist, Office of General Counsel, at 202-408-2876 or                         *williss@fhfb.gov.*

Dated: March 20, 2007. 

By the Federal Housing Finance Board. 

Neil R. Crowley,

Acting General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 07-1453 Filed 3-21-07; 9:19 am] 

BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

**ANNUALSERVICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

**WORLDFINANCIAL NETWORK NATIONAL BANK**

 

**WORLDFINANCIAL NETWORK CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorizedrepresentative of World Financial Network National Bank, as Servicer (“WFN”),pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 17,1996 (as may be amended and supplemented from time to time, the “Agreement”),among WFN, as Servicer, and The Bank of New York Midwest Trust Company, asTrustee, does hereby certify that:

 

1.               WFN is, as of the date hereof,Servicer under the Agreement. Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respectivemeanings as set forth in the Agreement.

 

2.               The undersigned is a ServicingOfficer who is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliverthis Certificate to Trustee.

 

3.               A review of the activities ofServicer during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, and of itsperformance under the Agreement was conducted under my supervision.

 

4.               Based on such review, Servicer has,to the best of my knowledge, performed in all material respects its obligationsunder the Agreement throughout such year and no default in the performance ofsuch obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in paragraph5.

 

5.               The following is a description ofeach default in the performance of Servicer’s obligations under the provisionsof the Agreement known to me to have been made by Servicer during the fiscalyear ended December 31, 2003, which sets forth in detail (i) the nature ofeach such default, (ii) the action taken by Servicer, if any, to remedy eachsuch default and (iii) the current status of each such default:  if applicable, insert “None.”

 

NONE

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 30thday of March, 2004.

 

 
|   | **WORLD  FINANCIAL NETWORK NATIONAL BANK,** |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   | as Servicer,                                |   |
|   |                                        |   |
|   | By                                          |  /s/ Daniel T.  Groomes |   |
|   |                                        |   |
|   | Name: Daniel T.  Groomes                    |   |
|   | Title: President                            |   |
|        |                                             |  |  |

 

----
§ 170.160 Specific applicability. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section, this subpart applies to each vessel.
( b ) This subpart does not apply to any of the following vessels unless the stability of the vessel is questioned by the OCMI: ( 1 ) A deck cargo barge that complies with the requirements in § 174.020 of this chapter.
( 2 ) A tank vessel that only carries a product listed in § 30.25-1 of this chapter and that is— ( i ) Less than 150 gross tons; or
( ii ) A tank barge that operates only in river or lakes, bays, and sounds service.
( 3 ) A sailing school vessel that is an open boat that complies with the requirements in § 173.063(e) of this subchapter.
( c ) This subpart does not apply to the following vessels: ( 1 ) A tank barge that carries a product listed in Table 151.05 of this chapter.
( 2 ) A mobile offshore drilling unit.
( 3 ) A vessel that performs one of the simplified stability proof tests described in subpart C of part 178 of this chapter.
( d ) A vessel that complies with § 170.165 of this part need not comply with §§ 170.170 and 170.173 of this part.
[CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51010, Nov. 4, 1983, as amended by CGD 83-005, 51 FR 923, Jan. 9, 1986; CGD 85-080, 61 FR 944, Jan. 10, 1996; USCG-2007-29018, 72 FR 53968, Sept. 21, 2007; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49239, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2007-0030, 75 FR 78084, Dec. 14, 2010]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

In Re Case No. 2:14−cv−14826−LPZ−DRG

Salvatore Cipriano, Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff

Magistrate Judge David R. Grand

NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF BANKRUPTCY APPEAL

 Pursuant to the Bankruptcy Rules, notice is hereby given that a Bankruptcy Appeal was

received on 12/19/2014 and assigned the case number and judicial officers as noted above.

 The bankruptcy court case number is 14−48527.

 The adversary proceeding number is 14−4957.

Dated: December 19, 2014

Certificate of Service

 I hereby certify that on this date a copy of the foregoing notice was served upon the parties

and/or counsel of record by electronic means or first class U.S. mail.

DAVID J. WEAVER, CLERK OF COURT

By: s/V. Lung 

Deputy Clerk

2:14-cv-14826-LPZ-DRG Doc # 2 Filed 12/19/14 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 18
#### § 169.101 Purpose; preemptive effect.

The regulations in this part set forth uniform requirements which are suited to the particular characteristics and specialized operations of sailing school vessels as defined in Title 46, United States Code section 2101(30). The regulations in this part have preemptive effect over State or local regulations in the same field.

[CGD 83-005, 51 FR 896, Jan. 9, 1986, as amended by USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33889, June 7, 2012]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case Number: 14-cr-20788 

 v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

 Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris 

JESSE HERNANDEZ, 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING 

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA 

AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT 

On April 28, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris conducted a plea 

hearing pursuant to Defendant’s consent. The Magistrate Judge issued her report the next day, 

April 29, 2015, recommending that this Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty. 

Although the Magistrate Judge’s report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may 

object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, 

neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the 

Magistrate Judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and 

recommendation waives any further right to appeal. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation 

(ECF No. 18) is ADOPTED. 

 It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s plea of guilty is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 

Plea Agreement (ECF No. 17) is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT. 

Dated: May 19, 2015 s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

1:14-cr-20788-TLL-PTM Doc # 22 Filed 05/19/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 82
PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on May 19, 2015. 

 s/Karri Sandusky 

 Karri Sandusky, Acting Case Manager 

1:14-cr-20788-TLL-PTM Doc # 22 Filed 05/19/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 83