alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Figure 5 data from Sather et al., Baseline ambient gaseous ammonia concentrations in the Four Corners area and eastern Oklahoma, USA, J. Environ. Monit ., 2008, 10, 1319-1325.

Passive ammonia data time series for the Four Corners area sites; 3-week integrated samples; ending dates 1/3/08 for Southern Ute and 1/22/08 for Mesa Verde NP.

units=ppb

ending date (2007) Substation Farmington Airport Navajo Lake Southern Ute Mesa Verde NP

2-Jan 0.6 1.5 0 0.7 0.1

23-Jan 0.5 1.4 0 0.8 0

13-Feb 0.5 1.8 0.2 0.9 0.4

6-Mar 0.2 0.5 0 0.3 0

27-Mar 0.5 1.4 0.2 0.7 0.1

17-Apr 0.5 1.1 0.1 0.6 0.2

8-May 0.8 1.3 0.4 1.5 0.3

29-May 0.6 1.3 0.3 1 0.2

19-Jun 0.5 1.1 0.2 0.8 0.3

10-Jul 0.8 1.3 0.4 1.2 0.3

31-Jul 2.1 2.9 0.5 1.5 0.6

21-Aug 1.5 2.4 0.3 0.9 0.5

11-Sep 1.4 1.6 0.3 0.8 0.2

2-Oct 1.8 1.7 0.2 0.7 0.2

23-Oct 3.5 1.1 0.2 0.6 0.2

13-Nov 3 1.4 0 0.4 0

4-Dec 1.1 1.6 0.2 0.9 0.1

31-Dec 0.5 1.1 0.1 0.6 0

AVERAGE 1.133333333 1.472222222 0.2 0.827777778 0.205555556

estimated ammonia background per month (ppb)

Mesa Verde NP (avg) Four Corners area (5 site average)

Jan 0 0.5 January estimate uses Jan 23 (end date) data averages

Feb 0.2 0.5 February estimate uses Feb 13 and Mar 6 data averages

Mar 0.1 0.6 March estimate uses Mar 27 data averages

Apr 0.3 0.7 April estimate uses Apr 17 and May 8 data averages

May 0.2 0.7 May estimate uses May 29 data averages

Jun 0.3 0.7 June estimate uses Jun 19 and Jul 10 data averages

Jul 0.6 1.5 July estimate uses Jul 31 data averages

Aug 0.5 1.1 August estimate uses Aug 21 data averages

Sep 0.2 0.9 September estimate uses Sept 11 and Oct 2 data averages

Oct 0.2 1.1 October estimate uses Oct 23 data averages

Nov 0.1 0.9 November estimate uses Nov 13 and Dec 4 data averages

Dec 0.1 0.5 December estimate uses Jan 2 and Dec 31 data averages

AVERAGE 0.876587302

Mesa Verde NP (max) Four Corners area (5 site max.)

Jan 0 1.4 January estimate uses Jan 23 (end date) data max.

Feb 0.4 1.8 February estimate uses Feb 13 and Mar 6 data max.

Mar 0.1 1.4 March estimate uses Mar 27 data max.

Apr 0.3 1.5 April estimate uses Apr 17 and May 8 data max.

May 0.2 1.3 May estimate uses May 29 data max.

Jun 0.3 1.3 June estimate uses Jun 19 and Jul 10 data max.

Jul 0.6 2.9 July estimate uses Jul 31 data max.

Aug 0.5 2.4 August estimate uses Aug 21 data max.

Sep 0.2 1.8 September estimate uses Sept 11 and Oct 2 data max.

Oct 0.2 3.5 October estimate uses Oct 23 data max.

Nov 0.1 3 November estimate uses Nov 13 and Dec 4 data max.

Dec 0.1 1.5 December estimate uses Jan 2 and Dec 31 data max.

AVERAGE 1.738439153
§ 163.002-17 Instructions and marking. ( a ) *Instruction plates or placards.* Each pilot hoist must have instructions that show its method of operation and lubrication of its working parts. The instructions must be on one or more corrosion-resistant plates, or must be weatherproof placards. The instructions must be attached to the hoist. Each instruction must be in English or must have understandable symbols or pictograms. The operator of the hoist must be able to see and read the operating instructions when operating the hoist control lever. The lubricating instructions must state the recommended lubricants for the temperature range in which the hoist is designed to operate. The temperature range must be stated in both degrees Celsius and Fahrenheit.
( b ) *Marking of controls.* Each control on a pilot hoist and each position of the control must be identified by a marking on the hoist.
( c ) *Marking of gauges.* Each gauge on a pilot hoist must be marked with its normal operating range.
( d ) *Manual.* Each pilot hoist must have a manual of installation instructions, operating instructions, maintenance and repair instructions, a lubrication chart, a parts list, a list of sources of repair parts, and a log for keeping maintenance records. Each manual must be in English.
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.1 Page 1 of 24
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.2 Page 2 of 24
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.3 Page 3 of 24
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.4 Page 4 of 24
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.5 Page 5 of 24
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.6 Page 6 of 24
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.7 Page 7 of 24
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.8 Page 8 of 24
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.9 Page 9 of 24
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.10 Page 10 of 24
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.11 Page 11 of 24
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.12 Page 12 of 24
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.13 Page 13 of 24
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.14 Page 14 of 24
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.15 Page 15 of 24
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.16 Page 16 of 24
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.17 Page 17 of 24
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.18 Page 18 of 24
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.19 Page 19 of 24
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.20 Page 20 of 24
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.21 Page 21 of 24
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.22 Page 22 of 24
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.23 Page 23 of 24
Case 2:14-cv-14305-NGE-MKM ECF No. 1 filed 11/07/14 PageID.24 Page 24 of 24
###### Editorial Note on Part 153

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 153.462 Static discharges from inert gas systems.

An inert gas system on a tank that carries a flammable or combustible cargo must not create static arcing as the inert gas is injected into the tank.
# C_2013178EN.01000802.xml

| 22.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/8

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2013 — Sanco v OHIM — Marsalman (Representation of a chicken)

(Case T-249/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark representing a chicken - Earlier national figurative mark representing a chicken - Relative ground for refusal - Similarity between goods and services - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 178/14

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sanco, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: A. Segura Roda, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Marsalman, SL (Barcelona, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 February 2011 (Case R 1073/2010-2), concerning opposition proceedings between Sanco, SA and Marsalman, SL

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 17 February 2011 (Case R 1073/2010-2); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 17 February 2011 (Case R 1073/2010-2);

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders OHIM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 204, 9.7.2011.

1

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 153

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 153.294 Marking of piping systems.

(a) Each cargo piping system must be marked with the designation number of the cargo tank it serves at each hose connection, valve, and blind in the piping system. The markings must be in characters at least 5 cm (approx. 2 in.) high.

(b) Every hose connection of a cargo piping system must be marked with the cargo piping system's working pressure required by § 38.10-10(a) of this chapter.[4]

###### Footnotes -
  153.294

[4] See § 153.280 of the part.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel, April 18, 2007, 9 a.m. to April 19, 2007, 5 p.m., Courtyard by Marriott Rockville, 2500 Research Boulevard, Rockville, MD, 20850 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on March 28, 2007, Volume 72, Number 59.                

The date of the meeting was changed to May 9-10, 2007. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: April 5, 2007.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-1846  Filed 4-13-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C_2012073EN.01001403.xml

| 10.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/14

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria), lodged on 30 November 2011 — T-Mobile Austria GmbH v Verein für Konsumenteninformation

(Case C-616/11)

2012/C 73/26

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant on a point of law: T-Mobile Austria GmbH

Appellant on a point of law:

Respondent on a point of law: Verein für Konsumenteninformation

Respondent on a point of law:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 52(3) of Directive 2007/64/EC (1) to be interpreted as meaning that it is also applicable to the contractual relationship between a mobile phone operator, as payee, and that operator’s private customer (the consumer), as payer? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 52(3) of Directive 2007/64/EC (1) to be interpreted as meaning that it is also applicable to the contractual relationship between a mobile phone operator, as payee, and that operator’s private customer (the consumer), as payer?

1

| 2. | Are a cash payment form signed by the payer in person and/or the procedure for ordering transfers based on a signed cash payment form and the agreed procedure for ordering transfers through online banking (telebanking) to be regarded as ‘payment instruments’ within the meaning of Article 4.23 and Article 52(3) of Directive 2007/64/EC? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Are a cash payment form signed by the payer in person and/or the procedure for ordering transfers based on a signed cash payment form and the agreed procedure for ordering transfers through online banking (telebanking) to be regarded as ‘payment instruments’ within the meaning of Article 4.23 and Article 52(3) of Directive 2007/64/EC?

| 3. | Is Article 52(3) of Directive 2007/64/EC to be interpreted as precluding the application of provisions of national law which prohibit a payee from levying charges in general and from levying different charges for different payment instruments in particular? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Is Article 52(3) of Directive 2007/64/EC to be interpreted as precluding the application of provisions of national law which prohibit a payee from levying charges in general and from levying different charges for different payment instruments in particular?

---

(1)  Directive 2007/64/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on payment services in the internal market, amending Directives 97/7/EC, 2002/65/EC, 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 97/5/EC (OJ 2007 L 319, p. 1).

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED 3/31/00 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          95,464
<SECURITIES>                                    31,043
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                       660
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               164,546
<PP&E>                                          12,139
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,687
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 183,498
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,206
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           538
<OTHER-SE>                                     157,754
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   183,498
<SALES>                                         38,167
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,167
<CGS>                                           18,382
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,382
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,726
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,689
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,748
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,056
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,692
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,692
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1   Certification  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Optimized Transportation Management, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  DATE: August 14, 2009  BY:/s/ Kevin P. Brennan Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  This certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard set forth therein, and not for any other purpose. It is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Optimized Transportation Management, Inc. and will be retained by Optimized Transportation Management, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Amendment of Stock Option Agreement with Edward C. Nafus



 Exhibit 10.67 
  
 AMENDMENT OF STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT 
  
 This Amendment of Stock Option Agreement is entered into as of the 11 day of January, 2005, between EDWARD C. NAFUS (the
“Optionee”) and CSG SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation. 
  
 * * * 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Optionee have entered into an Incentive Stock Option Agreement (the “ISO Agreement”) relating to a Stock Option granted to the Optionee by the Company under the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (the
“1996 Plan”) of the Company on March 5, 2003, covering 43,904 shares of Common Stock of the Company; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Optionee desire to amend the ISO Agreement as provided in this Amendment; and 
  
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph 21 of the 1996 Plan, the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors has approved this Amendment and directed that it be executed on behalf of the Company; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Optionee agree as follows: 
  

1. Paragraph 2 of the ISO Agreement hereby is amended by adding thereto at the end thereof the following additional sentence: 
  
 “If the Optionee remains in the continuous employ of the Company
through December 31, 2005, then on January 1, 2006, the Option automatically shall become immediately exercisable in full without regard to the preceding provisions of this Paragraph 2 relating to the exercisability of the Option in
installments.” 
  
 2. As amended by this Amendment, the ISO
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Optionee have executed this Amendment to Stock Option Agreement as of the date first above written. 
  

			
	CSG SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC., a
	Delaware corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Neal C. Hansen


	 	 	Neal C. Hansen, Chairman of the Board
	 	 	and Chief Executive Officer
		
	 	 	 /s/ Edward C. Nafus


	 	 	Edward C. Nafus, Optionee
Editorial Note on Part 162
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 162.050-33 Bilge alarm: Design specification. ( a ) This section contains requirements that apply to bilge alarms.
( b ) Each bilge alarm must be designed to meet the requirements for an oil content meter in § 162.050-25(b) through (f) and 162.050-25(i), and the requirements in this section.
( c ) Each bilge alarm must have a device that produces a warning signal, and a signal that can be used to actuate stop valves in a vessel's fixed piping system, when— ( 1 ) the oil content of the mixture being measured by the bilge alarm exceeds 15 ppm ±5 ppm, and
( 2 ) malfunction, breakdown, or other failure of the bilge alarm occurs.
( d ) Each bilge alarm must have a ppm display. Emulsions and/or the type of oil must not affect the ppm display. Calibrating the bilge alarm must not be necessary once installed on board the vessel, however, onboard testing in accordance with the manufacturer's operating instructions is permitted for the purposes of checking instrument drift and repeatability of the instrument reading, as well as the ability to re-zero the instrument. The accuracy of the readings must at all times remain within the limits described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
( e ) Each bilge alarm must be designed so that it displays each change in oil content of the mixture it is measuring within 5 seconds after the change occurs.
( f ) Access to the bilge alarm must require the breaking of a seal, except when— ( 1 ) Re-zeroing the instrument;
( 2 ) Checking the instrument drift; or
( 3 ) Checking the repeatability of the instrument reading.
( g ) Each bilge alarm must activate its alarm whenever clean water is used for cleaning or zeroing purposes.
( h ) The bilge alarm must record date, time, alarm status, and operating status of the 15 ppm bilge separator. The recording device must also store data for at least 18 months and be able to display or print a protocol. In the event the 15 ppm bilge alarm is replaced, means must be provided to ensure the data recorded remains available on board for 18 months.
[CGD 76-088a, 44 FR 53359, Sept. 13, 1979, as amended by USCG-2004-18939, 74 FR 3391, Jan. 16, 2009]
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.117-4 Approval procedures. ( a ) Manufacturers that desire type approval should submit a written notice to the Commandant (CG-ENG-4) describing the product and its intended uses. The Commandant will evaluate this information and notify the manufacturer of the product's suitability for testing. The manufacturer should then contract directly with an accepted independent laboratory to perform the required tests and inspections.
( b ) Upon completion of the required testing and inspections, the manufacturer must submit either a written request for type approval to the Commandant (CG-ENG-4), United States Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, or electronically submit a request to *typeapproval@uscg.mil*. The request must indicate the name and address of the manufacturer, all product designations, and the address of all manufacturing facilities. The request must include a copy of the final fire test report and the production inspection procedures. From the information submitted, the Commandant determines whether or not the product is acceptable for type approval. If the product is determined to be acceptable, a type approval certificate valid for a 5-year period will be issued. If the product is not accepted, the manufacturer will be notified of the reasons why.