alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00396-CR

Domingo Villarreal

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 16FC-1703-E

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 20, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          14,464
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  161,106
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (12,500)
<INVENTORY>                                     22,320
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               228,623
<PP&E>                                         241,113
<DEPRECIATION>                                 112,208
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,614,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,654
<OTHER-SE>                                     549,734
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,614,932
<SALES>                                        497,188
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               497,188
<CGS>                                          310,189
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  310,189
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,238,809
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             123,571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,155,099)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,155,099)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,155,099)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.84)


</TABLE>
# C_2012109EN.01001303.xml

| 14.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/13

---

Order of the Judge of the General Court hearing applications for interim measures of 16 February 2012 — Morison Menon Chartered Accountants and Others v Council

(Case T-656/11 R)

(Interim relief - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Application for suspension of operation - No urgency)

2012/C 109/31

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Morison Menon Chartered Accountants (Dubai, United Arab Emirates); Morison Menon Chartered Accountants — Dubai Office (Dubai); and Morison Menon Chartered Accountants — Sharjah Office (Sharjah, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: H. Viaene, T. Ruys and D. Gillet, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M.-M. Joséphidès and S. Kyriakopoulou, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of, first, Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2001 of 1 December 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 11) and, second, Council Decision 2011/783/CFSP of 1 December 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 71), in so far as they add to the list of persons and entities whose funds and economic resources are to be frozen the entity known as ‘Morison Menon Chartered Accountants’.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 72 (Monday, April 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1841]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Cell 
Structure and Function Study Section, June 7, 2007, 8 a.m. to June 8, 
2007, 5:30 p.m., Admiral Fell Inn, 888 South Broadway, Baltimore, MD 
21231, which was published in the Federal Register on April 5, 2007, 72 
FR 16805-16806.
    The meeting will be held one day only June 7, 2007, 8 a.m. to 7 
p.m. The meeting location remains the same. The meeting is closed to 
the public.

    Dated: April 9, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1841 Filed 4-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             221
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      235
<ALLOWANCES>                                        84
<INVENTORY>                                         33
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   532
<PP&E>                                           6,124
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (799)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              411
<BONDS>                                          2,526
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,720
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,360
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,326
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,715
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   218
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    40
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  95
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    225
<INCOME-TAX>                                       101
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                121
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            2
<NET-INCOME>                                       119
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39


</TABLE>
§ 183.320 Generators and motors. ( a ) Each generator and motor must be: ( 1 ) In a location that is accessible, adequately ventilated, and as dry as practicable; and
( 2 ) Mounted above the bilges to avoid damage by splash and to avoid contact with low lying vapors.
( b ) Each generator and motor must be designed for an ambient temperature of 50 °C (122 °F) except that: ( 1 ) If the ambient temperature in the space where a generator or motor will be located will not exceed 40 °C (104 °F) under normal operating conditions, the generator or motor may be designed for an ambient temperature of 40 °C (104 °F); and
( 2 ) A generator or motor designed for 40 °C (104 °F) may be used in 50 °C (122 °F) ambient locations provided the generator or motor is derated to 80 percent of the full load rating, and the rating or setting of the overcurrent devices is reduced accordingly.
( c ) A voltmeter and an ammeter, which can be used for measuring voltage and current of a generator that is in operation, must be provided for a generator rated at 50 volts or more. For each alternating current generator, a means for measuring frequency must also be provided.
( d ) Each generator must have a nameplate attached to it containing the information required by Article 445 of NFPA 70 (incorporated by reference; see 46 CFR 175.600), and for a generator derated in accordance with paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the derated capacity.
( e ) Each motor must have a nameplate attached to it containing the information required by Article 430 of NFPA 70, and for a motor derated in accordance with paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the derated capacity.
( f ) Each generator must be protected by an overcurrent device set value not exceeding 115 percent of the generator full load rating.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 997, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65209, Oct. 31, 2008]
§ 196.35-1 Application. ( a ) Except as specifically noted, the provisions of this subpart shall apply to all manned vessels.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-20869 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARMANDO MACIN-HERRERA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-00-CR-359-1

- - - - - - - - - -

June 15, 2001

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Armando Macin-Herrera (Macin) appeals his conviction and

sentence following a guilty plea for illegal reentry following a 

deportation. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Macin argues that (1) he

should have received only a two-year sentence, because the

indictment failed to allege as an element of the offense that he

was an aggravated felon; and (2) the indictment was defective

because it failed to allege a general intent mens rea.

Macin acknowledges that his first argument is foreclosed by

the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United
No. 00-20869

-2-

States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue

for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v.

New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule

Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 487-90; United

States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert.

denied, 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). Macin’s argument is foreclosed. 

Macin challenges the alleged mens rea omission for the first

time on appeal. This court has upheld the sufficiency of an

indictment that contained substantially identical language to

Macin’s indictment. See United States v. Guzman-Ocampo, 236 F.3d

233, 239 n.13 (5th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, this argument is

foreclosed as well. Macin’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


    Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of ComBanc, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Paul G. Wreede, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

                         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                             section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                             Act of 1934, as amended; and

                         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
                             presents, in all material respects, the financial
                             condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Paul G. Wreede
------------------
Paul G. Wreede, President and Chief Executive Officer

August 8, 2003









                                       24
409 P.2d 119

#### STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Louis A. LOTT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 9627.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

Dec. 23, 1965.

*162Richards, Haga & Eberle, Boise, for appellant.

Allan G. Shepard, Atty. Gen., and Weldon S. Wood, Asst. Atty. Gen., Boise, for respondent.

*163McOUADE, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered against Louis A. Lott upon a jury verdict of guilty of burglary in the first degree.

Lott asserts that the evidence does not support the verdict or the judgment entered thereon. The uncontradicted evidence shows that in the early evening of February 5, 1963, a 1958 Ford four-door sedan without license plates was stolen from the premises of a Boise automobile sales agency. In addition, a license plate bearing the numbers 1A 8461 was stolen from another car which was located within the building occupied by the agency. A police officer testified that at approximately 9:30 on the evening of February 5, 1963, he saw the defendant driving a car of the above description, bearing a license plate marked 1A 8461, leaving the Boise area and proceeding easterly toward Mountain Home. The car was found the next day parked on the main street in Mountain Home.

Appellant contends that mere possession of recently stolen goods is not of itself sufficient evidence upon which to convict the possessor of those goods of the crime of burglary. The rule in this state is to the contrary. In our most recent opinion on this issue, State v. Haggard, 89 Idaho 217, 404 P.2d 580 (1965), we held that the defendant’s possession of recently stolen property was sufficient evidence upon which the jury could find him guilty of the crime of burglary.

 Appellant also contends that there is not sufficient evidence in the record to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the vehicle in defendant’s possession was the same vehicle stolen from the premises of the automobile agency. It is true that the identification of the.stolen automobile was less than conclusive. However, the evidence is conclusive that the stolen license plate was the same as the one seen by the policeman- on the car the. defendant; was driving a short time after the burglary. An *164owner of the automobile agency testified that the license plate was stolen from a car which was in the shop for repairs and identified the number of the plate. The policeman stated that when he saw the defendant on the evening of the burglary, he wrote down the license number of the car the defendant was driving. These numbers coincided with each other. This evidence sufficiently identifies the property in the possession of the defendant at that which was stolen from the agency.

The judgment below is affirmed.

McFADDEN, TAYLOR, SMITH and KNUDSON, JJ., concur.
§ 167.20-15 Scupper, sanitary and similar discharges. ( a ) All scupper, sanitary, and other similar discharges which lead through the ship's hull shall be fitted with efficient means for preventing the ingress of water in the event of a fracture of such pipes. The requirements do not apply to the discharges in the machinery space connected with the main and auxiliary engines, pumps, etc.
DYKEMA GOSSETTA PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY400 RENAISSANCE CENTERDETROIT, MICHIGAN 48243

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

Charles J. Taunt, Trustee 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bernard Glieberman, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 14-cv-14488 

Hon. Paul D. Borman 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW JOHN F. RHOADES AS COUNSEL AND 

REQUEST TO BE REMOVED FROM RECEIVING ELECTRONIC 

NOTICES 

John F. Rhoades, of the law firm of Dykema Gossett PLLC, respectfully 

requests this Court to withdraw his appearance as counsel on behalf of Plaintiff 

Charles J. Taunt in the above-captioned case. Plaintiff is and will continue to be 

represented by plaintiff’s counsel of record. 

John F. Rhoades also respectfully requests to be removed from receiving 

electronic notices on behalf of plaintiff at the following email address: 

jrhoades@dykema.com. 

Case 2:14-cv-14488-PDB-RSW ECF No. 71, PageID.1111 Filed 11/30/18 Page 1 of 3
2

DYKEMA GOSSETTA PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY400 RENAISSANCE CENTERDETROIT, MICHIGAN 48243

Dated: November 30, 2018 

Respectfully submitted, 

DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC

By:/s/ John F. Rhoades 

John F. Rhoades (P75575) 

400 Renaissance Center 

Detroit, MI 48243 

Tel. (313) 568-6800 

Fax (313) 568-6658 

jrhoades@dykema.com 

Case 2:14-cv-14488-PDB-RSW ECF No. 71, PageID.1112 Filed 11/30/18 Page 2 of 3
3

DYKEMA GOSSETTA PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY400 RENAISSANCE CENTERDETROIT, MICHIGAN 48243

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on November 30, 2018, I caused the foregoing to be 

electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using the 

ECF system which will send notification of such filing to counsel of record. 

/s/ John F. Rhoades 

John F. Rhoades (P75575) 

400 Renaissance Center 

Detroit, MI 48243 

Tel. (313) 568-6800 

Fax (313) 568-6658 

jrhoades@dykema.com

Case 2:14-cv-14488-PDB-RSW ECF No. 71, PageID.1113 Filed 11/30/18 Page 3 of 3
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 2476

FIJI ZAIRE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Claude M. Hilton , Senior District Judge. ( 1:19

- cv - 00873

- CMH

- TCB )

Submitted : September 29, 2020 Decided: October 14, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WILKINSON, Circuit Judge , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Monique Antonia Miles, OLD TOWNE ASSOCIATES, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Nat P. Calamis, Sarah W. Conkright , CARR MALONEY P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Fiji Zaire, a self

- identified African American woman with diabetes, appeals the district court’s order granting Episcopal Hi gh School ’s motion to dismiss her complaint alleging she was discriminated against and subjected to a hostile work environment because of her race and disability, and then retaliated against after complaining of the alleged unlawful treatment, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e

- 17; the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101

- 12213; and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. We have considered the parties’ argument s in conjunction with the record and find no revers ible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court

. See Zaire v. Episcopal High Sch. , No. 1:19

- cv - 00873

- CMH

- TCB ( E.D. Va

. Nov. 22 , 2019 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                          CENTRAL FEDERAL CORPORATION
                                  Exhibit 10.1
                   AMENDMENT TO SALARY CONTINUATION AGREEMENT
                                     CFBANK


This AMENDMENT TO SALARY CONTINUATION AGREEMENT (this "AMENDMENT") is entered
into and made effective as of April 21, 2005 between CFBank, a federally
chartered savings association located in Fairlawn, Ohio (the "COMPANY"), and
David C. Vernon, an Ohio resident (the "EXECUTIVE").

A.      The Company and the Executive entered into a Salary Continuation
        Agreement as of May 25, 2004 (the "AGREEMENT").

B.      The purpose of the Agreement is to provide specified benefits to the
        Executive, who contributes materially to the continued growth,
        development and future business success of the Company.

C.      The Agreement is unfunded for tax purposes and for purposes of Title I
        of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended from
        time to time, and the Company will pay the benefits under the Agreement
        from the Company's general assets.

D.      The Company and the Executive desire to clarify that payments under the
        Agreement will commence after the retirement of the Executive, which is
        scheduled to be February 28, 2008 under terms of the Employment
        Agreement between the Company and the Executive dated as of February 28,
        2003, as amended as of May 10, 2004 and as further amended as of
        December 16, 2004.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises set forth
in this Amendment, the Company and the Executive agree as follows:

1.      Section 1.13 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting "the
Executive's 66th birthday" and substituting "February 28, 2008" therefor.

2.      All provisions of the Agreement, other than as modified in this
Amendment, are hereby ratified and shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Association and the Executive have executed this
Amendment as of the day and year first written above.

THE COMPANY:                                         THE EXECUTIVE:

CFBANK
                                                     /s/ David C. Vernon
                                                     --------------------
By:      /s/ Thomas P. Ash                           David C. Vernon
         ------------------
Name in
Print:   Thomas P. Ash
         --------------------------
         For the Board of Directors






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                                                              23
§ 182.310 Installations. ( a ) Auxiliary machinery of the internal combustion piston type must comply with the provisions of this part.
( b ) Auxiliary machinery of the steam or gas turbine type will be given separate consideration and must meet the applicable requirements of subchapter F (Marine Engineering) of this chapter as determined necessary by the cognizant OCMI.
( c ) Auxiliary boilers and heating boilers and their associated piping and fittings will be given separate consideration and must meet the applicable requirements of subchapter F (Marine Engineering) of this chapter as determined necessary by the cognizant OCMI, except that heating boilers must be tested or examined every three years.
§ 128.220 Class II non-vital systems—materials and pressure design. ( a ) Except as provided by §§ 128.230, 128.240, and 128.320 of this subpart, a Class II non-vital piping-system need not meet the requirements for materials and pressure design of subchapter F of this chapter.
( b ) Piping for salt-water service must be of a corrosion-resistant material and, if ferrous, be hot-dip galvanized or be at least of extra-heavy schedule in wall thickness.
( c ) Each Class II non-vital piping-system must be certified by the builder as suitable for its intended service. A written certificate to this effect must be submitted with the plans required by § 127.110(d) of this subchapter.
( d ) The cognizant OCMI will review the particular installation of each system for the safety hazards identified in paragraphs (a), (b)(1), and (c) through (k) of § 56.50-1 of this chapter, and will add requirements as appropriate.