alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MICHAEL KITCHEN,

Plaintiff,

vs Case No: 14-12883

Honorable Victoria A. Roberts

DANIEL HEYNS, ET AL,

Defendants.

___________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On May 5, 2015, Magistrate Judge Grand issued a Report and Recommendation

(“R&R”) recommending the Court grant Defendant MDOC’s Motion to Sever. On June

19, 2015, Plaintiff filed objections.

In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court

has reviewed de novo the R&R and Plaintiff’s objections. The Court agrees with

Magistrate Judge Grand’s conclusion.

The Court ADOPTS the R&R and GRANTS Defendant’s motion. Plaintiff can

continue his First and Fourteenth Amendment claims - and corresponding Michigan

Constitutional claims - against Defendants LaCroix, Maciejewski, Finco, Stephenson,

Steece, Gambati, and Hightower. The remainder of Plaintiff’s claims against

Defendants Heyns, Russell, Bauman, Schram, Prunick, Hursh, Tenuta, Seymour,

Stasewich, Eubanks, Russell, Fleury, Hill, Lindemuth, and Immel are dismissed without

prejudice.

2:14-cv-12883-VAR-DRG Doc # 63 Filed 08/11/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 676
IT IS ORDERED.

 /s/ Victoria A. Roberts 

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

Dated: August 11, 2015

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this

document was served on the attorneys of

record and Michael Kitchen by electronic

means or U.S. Mail on August 11, 2015.

s/Linda Vertriest 

Deputy Clerk

2:14-cv-12883-VAR-DRG Doc # 63 Filed 08/11/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 677
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of June 14, 2007 and October 4, 2007 meetings.

# SUMMARY:

This notice sets forth the date of the June 14, 2007 and October 4, 2007 meetings of the Gettysburg National Military Park Advisory Commission.

# DATE:

The public meetings will be held on June 14, 2007 and October 4, 2007 from 7 a.m. to 9 p.m.

*Location:*                         The meetings will be held at the Cyclorama Auditorium, 125 Taneytown Road, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania 17325.                    

*Agenda:*                         The June 14, 2007 meeting in addition to the following consists of Nomination of Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson for the 2007 Year, then at both the June 14, 2007 and October 4, 2007 meetings there will be Sub-Committee Reports from the Historical, Executive, and Interpretive Committees; Federal Consistency Reports Within the Gettysburg Battlefield Historic District; Operational Updates on Park Activities which include an update on the new Visitor Center/Museum Complex, also on the Wills House project, Landscape Rehabilitation, and the Shuttle System; and the Citizen's Open Forum where the public make comments and ask any questions on any park activity.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John A. Latschar, Superintendent, Gettysburg National Military Park, 97 Taneytown Road, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania 17325.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meetings will be open to the public. Any member of the public may file with the Commission a written statement concerning agenda items. The Statement should be addressed to the Gettysburg National Military Park Advisory Commission, 97 Taneytown Road, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania 17325.

Dated: March 9, 2007.

Dr. John A. Latschar,

Superintendent, Gettysburg NMP/Eisenhower NHS.

[FR Doc. 07-1864 Filed 4-13-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-JT-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      385
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (127)
<INVENTORY>                                         50
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   812
<PP&E>                                           8,705
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (934)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              675
<BONDS>                                          5,319
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,805
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,922
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,758
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,721
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   375
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    48
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 321
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    265
<INCOME-TAX>                                       114
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                150
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       150
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49


</TABLE>
# C_2015046EN.01004202.xml

| 9.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2014 — Xeda International v Commission

(Case T-269/11) (1)

1

((Plant protection products - Active substance ethoxyquin - Non-inclusion in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC - Withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance - Regulation (EC) No 2229/2004 - Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 - Accelerated assessment procedure - Manifest error of assessment - Rights of the defence - Proportionality - Legitimate expectations))

(2015/C 046/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Xeda International SA (Saint-Andiol, France) (represented by: C. Mereu and K. Van Maldegem, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi, G. von Rintelen and P. Ondrůšek, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision 2011/143/EU of 3 March 2011 concerning the non-inclusion of ethoxyquin in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and amending Commission Decision 2008/941/EC (OJ 2011 L 59, p. 71).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Xeda International SA to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for interim relief. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Xeda International SA to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for interim relief.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 16.7.2011.

1

---
# C_2014135EN.01003601.xml

| 5.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/36

---

Order of the General Court of 10 March 2014 — Hemofarm v OHIM — Laboratorios Diafarm (HEMOFARM)

(Case T-411/11) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 135/45

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hemofarm AD farmaceutsko-hemijska industrija Vršac (Vršac, Serbia) (represented by: D. Cañadas Arcas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Laboratorios Diafarm, SA (Barberà del Vallès, Spain) (represented by: E. Sugrañes Coca, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 May 2011 (Case R 298/2010-4), concerning an opposition procedure between Laboratorios Diafarm, SA and Hemofarm AD farmaceutsko-hemijska industrija Vršac.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | All the parties are ordered to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

All the parties are ordered to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 22.10.2011.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.32 Equivalents. ( a ) A vessel that fails to meet the standards in this part for an endorsement on a Certificate of Inspection or a Certificate of Compliance may meet an alternate standard if the Commandant (CG-ENG) finds that the alternate standard provides an equivalent or greater level of protection for the purpose of safety.
( b ) The Commandant (CG-ENG) considers issuance of a finding of equivalence to the standard required by this part if the person requesting the finding submits a written application to the Commandant (CG-ENG) that includes— ( 1 ) A detailed explanation of the vessel's characteristics that do not meet the requirements in this part; and
( 2 ) An explanation of how each substituted standard would enable the vessel to meet a level of safety that would be equivalent to or greater than the standard in this part.
( c ) Operational methods or procedures may not be substituted for a particular fitting, material, appliance, apparatus, item, or type of equipment required in this part.
<PAGE>

                           CENTRAL FEDERAL CORPORATION
                                     Ex-32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Central Federal Corporation (the
"Corporation") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David C. Vernon, Chairman, President and CEO of the Corporation, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Corporation.


Dated:  August 14, 2003                By:   /s/ David C. Vernon
                                             -----------------------------
                                             David C. Vernon
                                             Chairman, President and CEO
                                             (Principal Executive Officer)


                                                                             22.
# C_2011186EN.01002802.xml

| 25.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/28

---

Action brought on 5 April 2011 — MB System v Commission

(Case T-209/11)

2011/C 186/53

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: MB System GmbH & Co. KG (Nordhausen, Germany) (represented by: G. Brüggen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Commission Decision K(2010) 8289 final of 14 December 2010 on State aid No C 38/2005 (ex NN 52/2004) granted by Germany to the Biria Group; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Decision K(2010) 8289 final of 14 December 2010 on State aid No C 38/2005 (ex NN 52/2004) granted by Germany to the Biria Group;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law: wrong assessment of the facts through the classification of the undertaking as an undertaking in difficulty; |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law: wrong assessment of the facts through the classification of the undertaking as an undertaking in difficulty;

| 2. | Second plea in law: failure to apply the 1999 Guidelines for State aid for rescue and restructuring in the classification of the undertaking as an undertaking in difficulty and examination of the value of the ‘binding comfort letter’; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law: failure to apply the 1999 Guidelines for State aid for rescue and restructuring in the classification of the undertaking as an undertaking in difficulty and examination of the value of the ‘binding comfort letter’;

| 3. | Third plea in law: insufficient grounds for diverging from the 1999 Guidelines for State aid for rescue and restructuring in the classification as an undertaking in difficulty and examination of the value of the ‘binding comfort letter’; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law: insufficient grounds for diverging from the 1999 Guidelines for State aid for rescue and restructuring in the classification as an undertaking in difficulty and examination of the value of the ‘binding comfort letter’;

| 4. | Fourth plea in law: error of assessment in the calculation of the amount of State aid to be recovered as a result of failure to assess the ‘binding comfort letter’ in the calculation of the amount of State aid to be recovered. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Fourth plea in law: error of assessment in the calculation of the amount of State aid to be recovered as a result of failure to assess the ‘binding comfort letter’ in the calculation of the amount of State aid to be recovered.

---
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-129 

________________________________________________________________________ 

WEAPONS 

Proliferation 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and BULGARIA 

Signed at Washington June 17, 2008 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 BULGARIA 

 Weapons: Proliferation 

Agreement signed at Washington June 17, 2008; 

 Entered into force January 29, 2009. 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
# C_2008258EN.01000801.xml

| 10.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/8

---

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2008/C 258/04)

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1), following which no request for a review was lodged, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will shortly expire.

1

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (2).

2

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Integrated electronic compact fluorescent lamps (CFL-i) | People's Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 1205/2007 (OJ L 272, 17.10.2007, p. 1) and extended to imports of the same product consigned from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the Republic of the Philippines | 18.10.2008 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Integrated electronic compact fluorescent lamps (CFL-i)

People's Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 1205/2007 (OJ L 272, 17.10.2007, p. 1) and extended to imports of the same product consigned from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the Republic of the Philippines

18.10.2008

---

(1)  OJ C 99, 19.4.2008, p. 45.

1

(2)  OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1.

2

---
# C_2012049EN.01002501.xml

| 18.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/25

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 22 December 2011 — Al-Chihabi v Council

(Case T-593/11 R)

(Interim relief - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Syria - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Application for interim measures - No urgency - No serious and irreparable damage)

2012/C 49/45

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fares Al-Chihabi (Aleppo, Syria) (represented by: L. Ruessmann and W. Berg, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for, in essence, the suspension of operation of Council Decision 2011/522/CFSP of 2 September 2011 amending Decision 2011/273/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2011 L 228, p. 16), Council Regulation (EU) No 878/2011 of 2 September 2011 amending Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2011 L 228, p. 1), Council Decision 2011/684/CFSP of 13 October 2011 amending Decision 2011/273/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2011 L 269, p. 33) and Council Regulation (EU) No 1011/2011 of 13 October 2011 amending Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2011 L 269, p. 18), to the extent that those measures affect the applicant.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
----

Compare to Plates 7 and 8 for details of seafloor morphology. Note the high-backscatter submerged reef and terrace outer edges. A high-backscatter lava flow is visible north and west of the disposal site. Compare to Figures 24, 25, 26, 27, and 28.  Sun Illumination for land: azimuth 345 degrees; angle 45 degrees.

*go to a larger version of Figure 23 (3.8MB)**go to metadata for this field activity, A-1-98-HW*

----

----

----

SusanA. Cochran

U.S. Department of the Interior,U.S.Geological Survey,Western RegionCoastal and Marine Geology
§ 180.210 Rescue boats. ( a ) A vessel of more than 19.8 meters (65 feet) in length must carry at least one rescue boat unless the cognizant OCMI determines that: ( 1 ) The vessel is sufficiently maneuverable, arranged, and equipped to allow the crew to recover a helpless person from the water;
( 2 ) Recovery of a helpless person can be observed from the operating station; and
( 3 ) The vessel does not regularly engage in operations that restrict its maneuverability.
( b ) A vessel of not more than 19.8 meters (65 feet) in length is not required to carry a rescue boat unless: ( 1 ) The vessel carries passengers on an open or partially enclosed deck; and
( 2 ) The cognizant OCMI determines that the vessel is designed, arranged, or involved in operations so that the vessel itself cannot serve as an adequate rescue craft.
( c ) In general, a rescue boat must be a small, lightweight boat with built-in buoyancy and capable of being readily launched and easily maneuvered. In addition, it must be of adequate proportion to permit taking an unconscious person on board without capsizing.
( d ) On a vessel of more than 19.8 meters (65 feet) in length operating on protected waters, a rescue boat approved under approval series 160.056 is acceptable in meeting the intent of this section. On a vessel of more than 19.8 meters operating on exposed or partially protected waters, a rescue boat approved under approval series 160.156 is acceptable in meeting the intent of this section. On a vessel of not more than 19.8 meters (65 feet) in length, a required rescue boat must be acceptable to the cognizant OCMI.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 975, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51357, Sept. 30, 1997; 62 FR 64306, Dec. 5, 1997]
Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

# District: 4
Federal Reserve Bank of: Cleveland

## Filings received during the week ending November 26, 2005

|Filer | Filing Type | Filing Proposal | End of Comment Period
|----- | ----------- | --------------- | ---------------------
|NONE 

## Availability of CRA Public Evaluations

|Institution / Location | RSSDID | Exam Date | CRAPublic Date | CRARating | Exam Method
|---------------------- | ------ | --------- | -------------- | --------- | -----------
|NONE                  

## CRA Examinations scheduled for First Quarter of 2006 (January 1, 2006 - March 31, 2006)

|Institution | Location
|----------- | --------

Release dates | Full version (300 KB PDF)Actions by the Board | Actions 
  under delegated authority
  Applications and reports:Boston
 |
New York
 |
Philadelphia
 |
Cleveland
 |
Richmond
 |
Atlanta
Chicago
 |
St. Louis
 |
Minneapolis
 |
Kansas City
 |
Dallas
 |
San Francisco

---

Home Banking information and regulation  Accessibility Contact 
  us