alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: skolo@ncemch.org [mailto:skolo@ncemch.org] On Behalf Of Sarah Kolo

Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 12:38 PM

To: Robert Chew

Subject: Re: Safety Net Dental Clinic Manual Question

Hello, again, Rob,

Thanks for your patience! I reached the original author and he sent information about your 

questions.

(1) I was wondering where the start-up cost information comes from, 

particularly for the “Construction”, “Large Equipment” and “Supplies, 

Instruments and Small Equipment” categories. I see in the footnote that the data 

was collected in 2004 but I was wondering if you had any information about the 

source of the information (is it survey data or were the cost figures determined 

through equipment costs provided by vendors?).

The cost of the equipment was obtained from equipment suppliers Henry Schein 

and ADEC. The equipment list was the one used by the Indian Health Service 

when they construct a new facility. This was for large and small equipment as 

well as supplies. The prices had been adjusted for inflation up until 2010.

(2) Is there information for the “Construction”, “Large Equipment” and 

“Supplies, Instruments and Small Equipment” categories that are broken out into 

more specific line items? For example, do you have information on what 

equipment is included in the “Large Equipment” category and how much each 

piece of equipment cost when the table was put together?

When we were originally designing the site we were going to have all of the 

materials on the attached lists included on the site. But it was decided that this 

was too much information. Attached are various tables that I worked up and they 

include all equipment including dental vacuum system and air compressor. 

Hope this helps, Rob. Let me know if you would like further information.

Sarah Kolo

National Maternal and Child Oral Health Resource Center

Georgetown University

Box 571272

Washington, DC 20057-1272

(202) 784-9553
sk22@georgetown.edu

www.mchoralhealth.org
# Comments and Responses

# List of Reviewers
###### Editorial Note on Part 160

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 160.132-11 [Reserved]
§ 140.635 Navigation assessment. ( a ) The officer in charge of a navigational watch must conduct a navigation assessment for the intended route and operations prior to getting underway. The navigation assessment must incorporate the requirements of pilothouse resource management of § 140.640, assess operational risks, and anticipate and manage workload demands. At a minimum, this assessment must consider: ( 1 ) The velocity and direction of currents in the area being transited;
( 2 ) Water depth, river stage, and tidal state along the route and at mooring location;
( 3 ) Prevailing visibility and weather conditions and changes anticipated along the intended route;
( 4 ) Density (actual and anticipated) of marine traffic;
( 5 ) The operational status of pilothouse instrumentation and controls, to include alarms, communication systems, variation and deviation errors of the compass, and any known nonconformities or deficiencies;
( 6 ) Air draft relative to bridges and overhead obstructions taking tide and river stage into consideration;
( 7 ) Horizontal clearance, to include bridge transits;
( 8 ) Lock transits;
( 9 ) Navigation hazards such as logs, wrecks or other obstructions in the water;
( 10 ) Any broadcast notice to mariners, safety or security zones or special navigation areas;
( 11 ) Configuration of the vessel and tow, including handling characteristics, field of vision from the pilothouse, and activities taking place onboard;
( 12 ) The knowledge, qualifications, and limitations of crewmembers who are assigned as members on watch and the experience and familiarity of crewmembers with the towing vessels particulars and equipment; and
( 13 ) Any special conditions not covered above that impact the safety of navigation.
( b ) The officer in charge of a navigational watch must keep the navigation assessment up-to-date to reflect changes in conditions and circumstances. This includes updates during the voyage or trip as necessary. At each change of the navigational watch, the oncoming officer in charge of the navigational watch must review the current navigation assessment for necessary changes.
( c ) The officer in charge of a navigational watch must ensure that the navigation assessment and any updates are communicated to other members of the navigational watch.
( d ) A navigation assessment entry must be recorded in the TVR, official log, or in accordance with the TSMS applicable to the vessel. The entry must include the date and time of the assessment, the name of the individual making the assessment, and the starting and ending points of the voyage or trip that the assessment covers.
Note to § 140.635. Certain towing vessels subject to § 140.635 are also subject to the voyage planning requirements of 33 CFR 164.80.
Case 1:11-cv-00766-ABJ Document 65 Filed 09/18/12 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-00766-ABJ Document 65 Filed 09/18/12 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-00766-ABJ Document 65 Filed 09/18/12 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-00766-ABJ Document 65 Filed 09/18/12 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:11-cv-00766-ABJ Document 65 Filed 09/18/12 Page 5 of 5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

Case No. 13-20892

vs.

HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

TOUSIF KHAN (D-15),

Defendant.

___________________________________/

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S DISCOVERY MOTIONS

WITHOUT PREJUDICE [DOCS. 290, 291, AND 292] AND

ORDERING THE RETENTION AND PRESERVATION OF ROUGH NOTES

This matter has come before the court on defendant Tousif Khan’s motion for

production or retention of rough notes, motion to compel discovery and motion for

disclosure of impeaching information. For the reasons stated on the record, the three

discovery motions are denied without prejudice. The government is ordered, and has

agreed, to make sure that the agents retain and preserve the rough notes made during

the course of the investigation in this case.

Dated: March 23, 2015

S/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

March 23, 2015 by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Marcia Beauchemin

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:13-cr-20892-GCS-RSW ECF No. 333, PageID.1959 Filed 03/23/15 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Wallace R. Barr, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

Dated
the 6th day of August 2004

/s/WALLACE R. BARRWallace R. Barr
President and Chief Executive Officer,
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.


---



QuickLinks
§ 169.815 Emergency signals. ( a ) The station bill must set forth the various signals used for calling the ship's company to their stations and for giving instructions while at their stations.
( b ) On vessels of 100 gross tons and over the following signals must be used. ( 1 ) The first alarm signal must be a continuous blast of the vessel's whistle for a period of not less than 10 seconds supplemented by the continuous ringing of the general alarm bells for not less than 10 seconds.
( 2 ) For dismissal from fire alarm stations, the general alarm must be sounded three times supplemented by three short blasts of the vessel's whistle.
( 3 ) The signal for boat stations or boat drill must be a succession of more than six short blasts, followed by one long blast, of the vessel's whistle supplemented by a comparable signal on the general alarm bells.
( 4 ) For dismissal from boat stations, there must be three short blasts of the whistle.
( c ) Where whistle signals are used for handling the lifeboats, they must be as follows: ( 1 ) To lower lifeboats, one short blast.
( 2 ) To stop lowering the lifeboats, two short blasts.
§ 185.512 Recommended emergency instructions format. An emergency instruction placard containing the following information will satisfy the requirements of § 185.510. ( a ) *Emergency instructions* — ( 1 ) *Rough weather at sea, crossing hazardous bars, or flooding.* ( i ) Close all watertight and weathertight doors, hatches, and airports to prevent taking water aboard or further flooding in the vessel.
( ii ) Keep bilges dry to prevent loss of stability due to water in bilges. Use power driven bilge pump, hand pump, and buckets to dewater.
( iii ) Align fire pumps to use as bilge pump if possible.
( iv ) Check all intake and discharge lines, which penetrate the hull, for leakage.
( v ) Passengers must remain seated and evenly distributed.
( vi ) Passengers must don life jackets if the going becomes very rough, the vessel is about to cross a hazardous bar, or when otherwise instructed by the master.
( vii ) Never abandon the vessel unless actually forced to do so.
( viii ) If assistance is needed follow the procedures on the emergency broadcast placard posted by the radiotelephone.
( ix ) Prepare survival craft (life floats, (inflatable) rafts, (inflatable) buoyant apparatus, boats) for launching.
( 2 ) *Man overboard.* ( i ) Throw a ring buoy overboard as close to the person as possible.
( ii ) Post a lookout to keep the person overboard in sight.
( iii ) Launch rescue boat and maneuver to pick up person in the water, or maneuver the vessel to pick up the person in the water.
( iv ) Have crew member put on life jacket, attach a safety line to him or her, and have him or her stand by jump into the water to assist the person overboard if necessary.
( v ) If person is not immediately located, notify Coast Guard and other vessels in vicinity by radiotelephone.
( vi ) Continue search until released by Coast Guard.
( 3 ) *Fire.* ( i ) Cut off air supply to fire—close items such as hatches, ports, doors, ventilators, and louvers, and shut off ventilation system.
( ii ) Cut off electrical system supplying affected compartment if possible.
( iii ) If safe, immediately use portable fire extinguishers at base of flames for flammable liquid or grease fires or water for fires in ordinary combustible materials. Do not use water on electrical fires.
( iv ) If fire is in machinery spaces, shut off fuel supply and ventilation and activate fixed extinguishing system if installed.
( v ) Maneuver vessel to minimize effect of wind on fire.
( vi ) If unable to control fire, immediately notify the Coast Guard and other craft in the vicinity by radiotelephone.
( vii ) Move passengers away from fire, have them put on life jackets, and if necessary, prepare to abandon the vessel.
( b ) [Reserved]
# C_2013359EN.01001102.xml

| 7.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/11

---

Order of the General Court of 9 October 2013 — Zinātnes, inovāciju un testēšanas centrs v Commission

(Case T-259/11) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Phare programme - Project concerning the development of a centre for innovation and testing of construction products - Commission decision to undertake recovery of part of the sums paid - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 359/19

Language of the case: Latvian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Zinātnes, inovāciju un testēšanas centrs (Jelgava, Latvia) (represented by: E. Darapoļskis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. van Nuffel and A. Sauka, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought by the association Zinātnes, inovāciju un testēšanas centrs in accordance with Article 263 TFEU, seeking annulment of the Commission’s decision notified to the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Latvia by letter dated 16 November 2010.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The application for access to Commission documents is also dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The application for access to Commission documents is also dismissed.

| 3. | Zinātnes, inovāciju un testēšanas centrs shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Zinātnes, inovāciju un testēšanas centrs shall pay the costs.

| 4. | There is no need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene from the Republic of Latvia and the Republic of Lithuania. |
| --- | --- |

4.

There is no need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene from the Republic of Latvia and the Republic of Lithuania.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 76 (Friday, April 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 20015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1948]



[[Page 20015]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


National Research Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the National Research 
Advisory Council will hold a meeting on Monday, May 7, 2007, in room 
900 at the Greenhoot Cohen Building, 1722 I Street, NW., Washington, 
DC. The meeting will convene at 8 a.m. and end at 3 p.m. The meeting is 
open to the public.
    The purpose of the Council is to provide external advice and review 
for VA's research mission. The May 7 meeting agenda will include a 
review of the VA research portfolio, a summary of current budget 
allocations and a discussion of information security. The Council will 
also provide feedback on the direction/focus of VA's research 
initiatives.
    Any member of the public who expects to attend the meeting or wants 
additional information should contact Jay A. Freedman, PhD, Designated 
Federal Officer, at (202) 254-0267. Oral comments from the public will 
not be accepted at the meeting. Written statements or comments should 
be transmitted electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f8929981d69e8a9d9d9c959996b88e99d69f978e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="49232830672f3b2c2c2d242827093f28672e263f">[email protected]</span></a> or mailed to Dr. 
Freedman at Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Research and 
Development (12), 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420.

    Dated: April 16, 2007.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-1948 Filed 4-19-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 183.380 Overcurrent protection. ( a ) Overcurrent protection must be provided for each ungrounded conductor for the purpose of opening the electric circuit if the current reaches a value that causes an excessive or dangerous temperature in the conductor or conductor insulation.
( b ) The grounded conductor of a circuit must not be disconnected by a switch or circuit breaker, unless the ungrounded conductors are simultaneously disconnected.
( c ) A conductor of a control, interlock, or indicator circuit, such as a conductor for an instrument, pilot light, ground detector light, or potential transformer, must be protected by an overcurrent device.
( d ) Conductors must be protected in accordance with their current carrying capacities. If the allowable current carrying capacity does not correspond to a standard device size, the next larger overcurrent device may be used provided it does not exceed 150 percent of the conductor current carrying capacity.
( e ) Steering gear control system circuits must be protected against short circuit.
( f ) Each steering gear feeder circuit must be protected by a circuit breaker that meets the requirements of § 58.25-55 in subchapter F of this chapter.
( g ) Each lighting branch circuit must be protected against overcurrent either by fuses or circuit breakers rated at not more than 30 amperes.
( h ) Overcurrent devices capable of carrying the starting current of the motor must be installed to protect motors, motor conductors, and control apparatus against: ( 1 ) Overcurrent due to short circuits or ground faults; and
( 2 ) Overload due to motor running overcurrent, in accordance with § 111.70-1 in subchapter J of this chapter. A protective device integral with the motor, which is responsive to both motor current and temperature, may be used.
( i ) An emergency switch must be provided in the normally ungrounded main supply conductor from a battery. The switch must be accessible and located as close to the battery as practicable.
( j ) Disconnect means must be provided on the supply side of and adjacent to all fuses for the purpose of de-energizing the fuses for inspection and maintenance purposes.
( k ) If the disconnect means is not within sight of the equipment that the circuit supplies, means must be provided for locking the disconnect device in the open position.
( l ) Fuses must be of the cartridge type only and be listed by Underwriters Laboratories or another independent laboratory recognized by the Commandant.
( m ) Each circuit breaker must meet UL 489 (incorporated by reference; see 46 CFR 175.600) or other standard specified by the Commandant, and be of the manually reset type designed for: ( 1 ) Inverse time delay;
( 2 ) Instantaneous short circuit protection; and
( 3 ) Switching duty if the breaker is used as a switch.
( n ) Each circuit breaker must indicate whether it is in the open or closed position.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 997, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51050, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2002-13058, 67 FR 61279, Sept. 30, 2002; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65210, Oct. 31, 2008]
# C_2012006EN.01002501.xml

| 7.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/25

---

Action brought on 10 October 2011 — ZZ v Parliament

(Case F-101/11)

2012/C 6/45

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: E. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the selection board in the open competition EPSO/AD/188/10 — INTERPRETERS for BULGARIAN (BG) of 30 June 2011 not to include the applicant on the reserve list for that competition and an application for damages for material and non-material damage.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the selection board in the open competition EPSO/AD/188/10 — INTERPRETERS for BULGARIAN (BG) of 30 June 2011 taken after re-examination of the applicant’s tests, confirming her results in them and, consequently, the decision not to include her on the reserve list; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the selection board in the open competition EPSO/AD/188/10 — INTERPRETERS for BULGARIAN (BG) of 30 June 2011 taken after re-examination of the applicant’s tests, confirming her results in them and, consequently, the decision not to include her on the reserve list;

| — | annul the decision of the selection board in the open competition EPSO/AD/188/10 — INTERPRETES for BULGARIAN (BG) of 31 May 2011 to include the applicant on the reserve list for that competition; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the selection board in the open competition EPSO/AD/188/10 — INTERPRETES for BULGARIAN (BG) of 31 May 2011 to include the applicant on the reserve list for that competition;

| — | annul all actions of the selection board subsequent to the stage when the contested irregularities occurred; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul all actions of the selection board subsequent to the stage when the contested irregularities occurred;

| — | order the defendant to pay, as damages for material and non-material damage and harm to the applicant’s career, a sum of EUR 15 000, subject to increase or reduction in the course of the proceedings, together with interest at the annual rate of 7 % from the date of this action; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay, as damages for material and non-material damage and harm to the applicant’s career, a sum of EUR 15 000, subject to increase or reduction in the course of the proceedings, together with interest at the annual rate of 7 % from the date of this action;

| — | order the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 160

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 160.170-3 Definitions.

In addition to the definitions in the IMO LSA Code (incorporated by reference, see § 160.170-5 of this subpart), in this subpart, the term:

*Commandant* means the Chief of the Lifesaving and Fire Safety Standards Division. Address: Commandant (CG-ENG-4), Attn: Lifesaving and Fire Safety Division, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509; telephone 202-372-1392 or fax 202-372-1924.

*Full load* means the weight of the complete rescue boat including all required equipment, provisions, fuel (if applicable), and the number of persons for which it is approved. This is also known as the “condition B” weight.

*Independent laboratory* has the same meaning as 46 CFR 159.001-3. A list of accepted independent laboratories is available from the Commandant and online at *http://cgmix.uscg.mil.*

*Light load* means the weight of the complete rescue boat empty and does not include fuel, required equipment, or the equivalent weight of persons. This is also known as the “condition A” weight.

*Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI)* means an officer of the Coast Guard designated as such by the Commandant and who fulfills the duties described in 46 CFR 1.01-15(b). The “cognizant OCMI” is the OCMI who has immediate jurisdiction over a vessel or geographic area for the purpose of performing the duties previously described.

*SOLAS* means the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as amended.

[USCG-2010-0048, 76 FR 63007, Oct. 11, 2011, as amended by USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60159, Sept. 30, 2013]