Your web browser is not supported You're using Internet Explorer, some features might not work. Please switch to another browser like Chrome, Firefox, or Edge for a better experience.


An official website of the United States government Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Federal Election Commission | United States of America Calendar
           Glossary
          Search
              Search


Menu
      Home
      Campaign finance data
        All data
            Raising
            Spending
            Loans and debts
            Filings and reports
            Candidates
            Committees
            Bulk data
            Campaign finance statistics
        Find elections. Search by state or ZIP code
          Look up contributions from specific individuals
      Help for candidates and committees
        All compliance resources
            Guides
            Forms
            Dates and deadlines
            Trainings
        Learn about electronic filing
          Find and contact your committee's analyst
      Legal resources
        All legal resources
            Advisory opinions
            Enforcement
            Statutes
            Legislation
            Regulations
            Court cases
            Policy and other guidance
        Search across all legal resources
          Search guidance documents
      About
        All about the FEC
            News and announcements
            Commission meetings
            Mission and history
            Leadership and structure
            Reports about the FEC
            Careers
            Working with the FEC
            Contact
        Introduction to campaign finance and elections


- Home
- ›
      FEC Record: Litigation
- ›
      The Real Truth About Abortion (f/k/a Real Truth About Obama, Inc.) v. FEC and U.S. Department of Justice (Appeals Court ruling)

FEC Record: Litigation*The Real Truth About Abortion (f/k/a Real Truth About Obama, Inc.) v. FEC and U.S. Department of Justice* (Appeals Court ruling)June 20, 2012 On June 12, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld Federal Election Commission legal definitions and policies regarding the disclosure of certain information by the nonprofit The Real Truth About Abortion (RTAA) – formerly
    known as The Real Truth About Obama, Inc. RTAA asserted the Commission’s definition of “express advocacy” and approach to determining whether a group is a “political committee” under the Federal Election Campaign Act (Act) were vague, overbroad, and violated the First and Fifth Amendments to
    the Constitution. However, the court’s three-judge panel stated the Commission’s definition of express advocacy is consistent with relevant Supreme Court decisions, and the Commission’s political committee determinations represent “a sensible approach”
    that “does not unlawfully deter protected speech.” Background RTAA, a nonprofit “527” corporation, challenged the constitutionality of several regulations that it believed would require the group to register as a political committee and disclose its fundraising and spending practices for political advertisements. RTAA argued that the Commission was overly broad and vague in its definition of “expressly advocating” in 11 CFR 100.22(b) as well as its approach to determining whether an organization qualifies as a “political committee” under the Act (“political committee
    status”). See 2 U.S.C. §431(4). It also challenged the application of these regulations and the methodology as they apply to two RTAA radio ads mentioning then-Senator Barack Obama. During the 2008 presidential campaign, RTAA planned to disburse over $1,000 to air the two ads, which
    might have brought RTAA within the statutory definition of “political committee.” Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals decision Express advocacy. The court held that the Commission’s definition of “express advocacy” is consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion in FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.    In that opinion, the Justices held that a communication susceptible of no reasonable interpretation other than as an appeal to vote for or against a candidate is the "functional equivalent of express advocacy." The Appeals Court determined that the Commission’s regulation, which requires that “reasonable minds [cannot] differ” about an advertisement’s message, was similar to the standard from Wisconsin Right to Life. The court determined that the constitutionality of 11 CFR 100.22(b) was not called into question by the decision in Citizens United v. FEC. It further noted that
    the Commission’s regulation “does not restrain speech; it only implicates the requirement for disclosing specified information.” Political committee status.The Act defines a "political committee" as any "committee, club, association, or other group of persons" that makes more than $1,000 in political expenditures or receives more than $1,000 in contributions during a calendar
    year. 2 U.S.C. § 431(4)(a). In Buckley v. Valeo, the Supreme Court limited the application of this definition to groups whose “major purpose” is the nomination or election
    of candidates. Following Buckley, the Commission adopted a method of determining a group’s “major purpose” on a case-by-case basis, by examining, for example, a group’s political activities, such as spending on a particular electoral or issue-advocacy campaign,
    and the group’s public statements and documents. The court ruled that the Commission’s methodology was “a sensible approach to determining whether an organization qualifies for PAC status.” The decision also states that the Commission’s approach is constitutional because its “multi-factor, major-purpose
    test is consistent with Supreme Court precedent and does not unlawfully deter protected speech.” “We conclude that the Commission had good and legal reasons for taking the approach it did,” the court’s opinion states. “The determination of whether the election or defeat of federal candidates for office is the major purpose of an organization, and
    not simply a major purpose, is inherently a comparative task, and in most instances it will require weighing the importance of some of a group’s activities against others.” U.S. District Court for Appeals for the Fourth Circuit: 11-1760. Resources:  The Real Truth About Abortion (f/k/a Real Truth About Obama, Inc.) v. FEC and U.S. Department of Justice  litigation page
 Author
          Alex Knott


Read next: AO 2012-11: Two of nonprofit's ads expressly advocate
 Related: Explore campaign finance data »


This information is not intended to replace the law or to change its meaning, nor does this information create or confer any rights for or on any person or bind the Federal Election Commission or the public. The reader is encouraged also to consult the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (52 U.S.C. 30101 et seq.), Commission regulations (Title 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations), Commission advisory opinions and applicable court decisions.


About
          Careers
          Press
          Contact
   Privacy and security policy
          Plain language
          No FEAR Act
          Strategy, budget and performance
 Open government
          Protected Voices
          USA.gov
          Inspector General
          FOIA
 OpenFEC API
          GitHub repository
          Release notes
          FEC.gov status


Federal Election Commission
 The FEC's Twitter page
            The FEC's YouTube page Sign up for FECMail


Hide glossary Glossary Search terms