alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
V 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 224 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain entries of newspaper 

printing presses and components thereof. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Ms. SHEA-PORTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain 

entries of newspaper printing presses and components 

thereof. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LARGE NEWSPAPER PRINTING PRESSES AND 

4 COMPONENTS THEREOF. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, U.S. 

6 Customs and Border Protection shall, not later than 90 

7 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, liquidate 

8 or reliquidate entries from Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho, Ltd. 

9 of large newspaper printing presses and components there10 of, whether assembled or unassembled, during the period 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 224 IH

1 September 1, 1997, through August 31, 1998, at the anti2 dumping duty rate of 59.67 percent, in accordance with 

3 the final results of the changed circumstances review con4 ducted by the International Trade Administration of the 

5 Department of Commerce for such entries (Case No. A– 

6 588–837; 71 Fed. Reg. 11590; March 8, 2006), plus any 

7 applicable interest that is due. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: May 4, 2015 

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR–2013-0602 

FROM: Melanie King, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

SUBJECT: April 28, 2015 Consultation with Navajo Nation and Salt River Project Regarding 

Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants 

SUMMARY 

A consultation was held between EPA and the attendee(s) listed below on April 28, 2015, to 

discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan Supplemental Proposal for Existing Power Plants in Indian 

Country and U.S. Territories. The Clean Power Plan Supplemental Proposal was issued on October 28, 

2014, and published in the Federal Register on November 4, 2014. 

ATTENDEES 

Navajo Nation (in person) 

Stephen Etsitty 

Harrison Tsosie 

April Quinn 

Jim Staudt 

Jill Grant 

Bethany Fisher 

Derek Dyson 

Greg Jones 

Simon Boyce 

Anthony Peterman 

Eugene Quintana 

Raju Bisht 

Navajo Nation (by phone) 

Greg Kelly 

Sam Woods 

Martin Ashley 

Michelle Henry 

Arvin Mitchell 

Bidtah Becker 

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (by phone) 

David Palumbo 

EPA (in person)

Janet McCabe 

William Niebling 

EPA (by phone)

Amy Zimpfer 

Ann Lyons 

Anita Lee 

Deborah Jordan 

Greg Green 

Chebryll Edwards 

Angela Hackel 

Melanie King 

Kevin Culligan 

Nate Topham 

Rick Vetter
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,933,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,954,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (140,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,714,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,887,000
<PP&E>                                     134,400,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (46,716,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             115,383,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,271,000
<BONDS>                                     43,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (18,856,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               115,383,000
<SALES>                                    119,433,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           119,433,000
<CGS>                                      100,579,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              109,689,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               216,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,181,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (648,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (648,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (648,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)


</TABLE>
Case 5:14-cv-13535-JCO-RSW   ECF No. 1, PageID.1   Filed 09/11/14   Page 1 of 8

Case 5:14-cv-13535-JCO-RSW   ECF No. 1, PageID.2   Filed 09/11/14   Page 2 of 8

Case 5:14-cv-13535-JCO-RSW   ECF No. 1, PageID.3   Filed 09/11/14   Page 3 of 8

Case 5:14-cv-13535-JCO-RSW   ECF No. 1, PageID.4   Filed 09/11/14   Page 4 of 8

Case 5:14-cv-13535-JCO-RSW   ECF No. 1, PageID.5   Filed 09/11/14   Page 5 of 8

Case 5:14-cv-13535-JCO-RSW   ECF No. 1, PageID.6   Filed 09/11/14   Page 6 of 8

Case 5:14-cv-13535-JCO-RSW   ECF No. 1, PageID.7   Filed 09/11/14   Page 7 of 8

Case 5:14-cv-13535-JCO-RSW   ECF No. 1, PageID.8   Filed 09/11/14   Page 8 of 8
1:14-cv-14122-TLL-PTM Doc # 52 Filed 04/21/15 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 1953
1:14-cv-14122-TLL-PTM Doc # 52 Filed 04/21/15 Pg 2 of 8 Pg ID 1954
1:14-cv-14122-TLL-PTM Doc # 52 Filed 04/21/15 Pg 3 of 8 Pg ID 1955
1:14-cv-14122-TLL-PTM Doc # 52 Filed 04/21/15 Pg 4 of 8 Pg ID 1956
1:14-cv-14122-TLL-PTM Doc # 52 Filed 04/21/15 Pg 5 of 8 Pg ID 1957
1:14-cv-14122-TLL-PTM Doc # 52 Filed 04/21/15 Pg 6 of 8 Pg ID 1958
1:14-cv-14122-TLL-PTM Doc # 52 Filed 04/21/15 Pg 7 of 8 Pg ID 1959
1:14-cv-14122-TLL-PTM Doc # 52 Filed 04/21/15 Pg 8 of 8 Pg ID 1960
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Flexible Solutions International, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB/A (Amendment No. 2) of the Company for the quarter ended
June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  December 5, 2005                 /s/ DANIEL B. O'BRIEN
                                        ---------------------
                                        Daniel B. O'Brien
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer





































                                        1
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.1150 Distribution of dry chemical. ( a ) All locations on the above deck cargo area and the cargo piping outside that cargo area must be protected by: ( 1 ) At least two dry chemical hand hose lines; or
( 2 ) At least one dry chemical hand hose line and one dry chemical monitor.
( b ) At least one dry chemical storage unit and hand hose line or monitor must be at the after end of the cargo areas.
( c ) Each cargo loading and discharge manifold must be protected by at least one dry chemical monitor.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of FFD Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Trent
B. Troyer, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Trent B. Troyer
-------------------------------------
Trent B. Troyer
President and Chief Executive Officer
September 29, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to FFD Financial Corporation and will be retained by FFD Financial
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### § 167.45-10 Couplings on fire hose.

The couplings on fire hose shall be of brass, copper, or composition material. All hydrants shall be provided with suitable spanners.
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.445 Design vapor pressure.

If the surfaces of an independent tank type B are mostly flat surfaces, the Po must not exceed 69 kPa gauge (10 psig).
a . Basic Levee (above).

b. Bank Levee (above).

Enclosure 3, Figure 1 : Typical Levee Cross Section s . The purpose of these illustrations is to define terms. These illustrations do not include appurtenant structures and do not represent all possible levee configurations. Analysis such as detailed in Enclosure 3, Paragraph 5.b.2 (above in Enclosure 3 ) ma y or may not show the prism to be smaller than the existing levee cross section

.
From:ETCA 901 685 2261 03/19/2013 09:04 #413 P.002/003
2005 Performance Goals




	





Exhibit 10.2







2005 PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN






The maximum award for each officer under the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (AICP) for the 2005 performance year will be derived from eight measurement criteria—four measurement criteria for the Company's oil and gas business, which account for 80% of the maximum AICP award, and four measurement criteria for the Company's chemical business, which account for 20% of the maximum AICP award. Performance under the measurement criteria is determined by comparing actual results to budget.




The four measurement criteria for the Company's oil and gas business for 2005 are: (1) Operating Cash Flow Per Barrel of Oil Equivalent (weighted 40% of the oil and gas component of the AICP award); (2) Production Volume (weighted 20%); (3) Production Replacement Rate (weighted 20%); and (4) Unit Finding, Development and Acquisition Costs (weighted 20%).

 



The four measurement criteria for the Company's chemical business for 2005 are: (1) Cash Flow Return on Average Capital Employed (weighted 40% of the chemical component of the AICP award); (2) Titanium Dioxide Sales Volume (weighted 20%); (3) Cash Cost per Tonne of Titanium Dioxide Sold (weighted 20%); and (4) Operating Profit (weighted 20%).
#### § 115.930 Equivalents.

In accordance with Chapter I (General Provisions) Regulation 5, of SOLAS, the Commandant may accept an equivalent to a particular fitting, material, appliance, apparatus, or any particular provision required by the SOLAS regulations if satisfied that such equivalent is at least as effective as that required by the regulations. An owner or managing operator of a vessel may submit a request for the acceptance of an equivalent following the procedures in § 114.540 of this subchapter. The acceptance of an equivalent must be indicated on the vessel's SOLAS Passenger Ship Safety Certificate.

[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 892, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51047, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2007-0030, 75 FR 78082, Dec. 14, 2010]
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.552 Cargo hose: Compatibility. Liquid and vapor cargo hoses must: ( a ) Not chemically react with the cargo; and
( b ) Withstand design temperature.
G-10(E) Applications and Solicitations Sample (Charge Cards)

Payment Information

All charges made on this charge card are due and payable when you receive your periodic statement. 

Fees 

Annual Fee $50

Transaction Fees 

• Balance Transfer Either $5 or 3% of the amount of each transfer, whichever is greater (maximum fee: 

$100). 

• Cash Advance Either $5 or 3% of the amount of each cash advance, whichever is greater. 

Penalty Fees

• Late Payment $31 if balance is less than or equal to $1,000; 

$35 if balance is more than $1,000 

• Over-the-Credit Limit $30 

• Returned Payment $30
§ 86.18 Amendments to conform to statutory exemptions. ( a ) Nothing in this part shall be construed to force or require any individual or hospital or any other institution, program, or activity receiving Federal funds to perform or pay for an abortion.
( b ) Nothing in this part shall be construed to require or prohibit any person, or public or private entity, to provide or pay for any benefit or service, including the use of facilities, related to an abortion. Nothing in the preceding sentence shall be construed to permit a penalty to be imposed on any person or individual because such person or individual is seeking or has received any benefit or service related to a legal abortion.
( c ) This part shall be construed consistently with, as applicable, the First Amendment to the Constitution, Title IX's religious exemptions (20 U.S.C. 1681(a)(3) and 1687(4)), the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (42 U.S.C. 2000b *et seq.*), and provisions related to abortion in the Church Amendments (42 U.S.C. 300a-7), the Coats-Snowe Amendment (42 U.S.C. 238n), section 1303 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18023), and appropriation rider provisions relating to abortion, to the extent they remain in effect or applicable, such as the Hyde Amendment (*e.g.,* Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2019, Pub. L. 115-245, Div. B, secs. 506-07), the Helms Amendment (*e.g.,* Continuing Appropriations Act, 2019, Pub. L. 116-6, Div. F, Title III), and the Weldon Amendment (*e.g.,* Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2019, Pub. L. 115-245, Div. B, sec. 507(d)).
[85 FR 37243, June 19, 2020]
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.151-33 Marking and labeling. ( a ) Whatever other languages they may be in, markings required on each inflatable liferaft and its container must be in English.
( b ) The markings required on the liferaft container under IMO LSA Code, as amended by Resolution MSC.293(87), Chapter IV/4.2.6.3 (incorporated by reference, see § 160.151-5 of this subpart) must be on a plate or label sufficiently durable to withstand continuous exposure to environmental conditions at sea for the life of the liferaft. In addition, the container must be marked with the— ( 1 ) Manufacturer's model identification; and
( 2 ) U.S. Coast Guard approval number.
( c ) In addition to the markings required on the inflatable liferaft under IMO LSA Code, as amended by Resolution MSC.293(87), Chapter IV/4.2.7.1, the liferaft must be marked with the— ( 1 ) Manufacturer's model identification;
( 2 ) Lot number; and
( 3 ) U.S. Coast Guard approval number.
[CGD 85-205, 62 FR 25547, May 9, 1997, as amended by USCG-2010-0048, 76 FR 62999, Oct. 11, 2011; USCG-2010-0048, 77 FR 9865, Feb. 21, 2012]
# C_2011072EN.01003602.xml

| 5.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/36

---

Action brought on 6 January 2011 — Soukup v Commission

(Case F-1/11)

2011/C 72/59

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Zdenek Soukup (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: E. Boigelot and S. Woog, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the selection board of Open Competition EPSO/AD/144/09 not to enter the applicant on the reserve list and the decision to enter another candidate on that list, and compensation for the material and non-material damage thereby suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the selection board of Open Competition EPSO/AD/144/09 of 27 April 2010 taken after re-examination of the applicant's oral test, confirming his results in the latter, namely a mark below the minimum required and, consequently, the decision not to enter him on the reserve list; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the selection board of Open Competition EPSO/AD/144/09 of 27 April 2010 taken after re-examination of the applicant's oral test, confirming his results in the latter, namely a mark below the minimum required and, consequently, the decision not to enter him on the reserve list;

| — | Annul the decision of the selection board of Open Competition EPSO/AD/144/09 to admit another candidate to the written and oral tests and, subsequently, to enter him/her on the reserve list of that competition; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the selection board of Open Competition EPSO/AD/144/09 to admit another candidate to the written and oral tests and, subsequently, to enter him/her on the reserve list of that competition;

| — | Annul all the operations carried out by the selection board as from the stage at which the irregularities complained of occurred; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul all the operations carried out by the selection board as from the stage at which the irregularities complained of occurred;

| — | Order the defendant to pay, by way of compensation for material and non-material damage and the adverse effect on the applicant's career, the sum of EUR 25 000, subject to increase or decrease in the course of the proceedings, plus interest at the rate of 7 % per annum as from 28 June 2010, the date of the complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay, by way of compensation for material and non-material damage and the adverse effect on the applicant's career, the sum of EUR 25 000, subject to increase or decrease in the course of the proceedings, plus interest at the rate of 7 % per annum as from 28 June 2010, the date of the complaint;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 160

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 160.010-2 Definitions.

*Buoyant apparatus.* Buoyant apparatus is flotation equipment (other than lifeboats, liferafts, and personal flotation devices) designed to support a specified number of persons in the water, and of such construction that it retains its shape and properties and requires no adjustment or preparation for use. The types of buoyant apparatus generally in use are the box-float type and the peripheral-body type defined in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.

*Box-float.* Box-float is buoyant apparatus of a box-like shape.

*Commandant* means the Commandant (CG-ENG-4), Attn: Lifesaving and Fire Safety Division, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509.

*Peripheral-body.* Peripheral body is buoyant apparatus with a continuous body in the shape of either an ellipse or rectangle with a circular, elliptical, or rectangular body cross-section.

*Inflatable buoyant apparatus.* An inflatable buoyant apparatus is flotation equipment that depends on inflated compartments for buoyancy and is designed to support a specified number of persons completely out of the water.

[CGD 79-167, 47 FR 41372, Sept. 20, 1982, as amended by CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50733, Sept. 27, 1996; CGD 85-205, 62 FR 25545, May 9, 1997; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49237, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2010-0048, 76 FR 62974, Oct. 11, 2011; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60156, Sept. 30, 2013]
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.439 Tank design. An independent tank type A must meet the deep tank standard of the American Bureau of Shipping published in “Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels”, 1981, and must: ( a ) Withstand the internal pressure determined under § 154.407;
( b ) Withstand loads from tank supports calculated under §§ 154.470 and 154.471; and
( c ) Have a corrosion allowance that meets § 154.412.
[CGD 74-289, 44 FR 26009, May 3, 1979, as amended by CGD 77-069, 52 FR 31630, Aug. 21, 1987]
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.176-7 Independent laboratories. A list of independent laboratories which have been accepted by the Commandant for conducting or supervising the following tests and inspections required by this subpart, may be obtained from the Commandant: ( a ) Approval tests.
( b ) Production tests and inspections.
( c ) Inspection of approved servicing facilities.
( d ) Testing of materials for the purpose of making the certification required by § 160.176-8(a)(3) of this part.
# C_2012039EN.01000801.xml

| 11.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/8

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 9 November 2011 — Société d’Exportation de Produits Agricoles SA (SEPA) v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

(Case C-562/11)

(2012/C 39/12)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Société d’Exportation de Produits Agricoles SA (SEPA)

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

Question referred

Must a penalty be imposed on an exporter who makes a request for a refund, providing a correct explanation of the facts relevant to the grant of the export refund, although no right to a refund actually exists in relation to the relevant exportation? (1)

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3665/87 of 27 November 1987 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of export refunds on agricultural products (OJ 1987 L 351, p. 1) as amended by Commission Regulation No 495/97 of 18 March (OJ 1997 L 77, p. 12)

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.1840 Protective clothing.

The person in charge of cargo transfer shall ensure that each person involved in a cargo transfer operation, except those assigned to gas-safe cargo control rooms, wears protective clothing.