alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 144.155 Verification of compliance with design standards for a sister vessel.

(a) Verification of compliance required by § 144.135 is not required for a sister vessel, provided that:

(1) The original vessel has been verified as complying with this part;

(2) The owner authorizes the use of the plans for the original vessels for the new construction of the sister vessel;

(3) The standards used in the design and construction of the original vessel have not changed since the original verification of compliance;

(4) The sister vessel is built to the same verified plans, drawings, schematics, calculations, and other documents and equipped with machinery of the same make and model as the original vessel, and has not been subsequently modified;

(5) The sister vessel is built in the same shipyard facility as the original vessel; and

(6) For a sister vessel subject to a stability standard, that the conditions in Table 144.155 of this section are met:

| If— | Then— |
| --- | --- |
| (i) The delivery date of the sister vessel is not more than 2 years after a previous stability test date of either the original vessel or an earlier sister vessel, | The approved lightweight characteristics of that earlier vessel are adopted by the sister vessel; |
| (ii) Paragraph (a)(6)(i) of this section does not apply, and the lightweight characteristics determined from a deadweight survey of the sister vessel are shown to meet both the following criteria: (A) the lightweight displacement differs by not more than 3 percent of the earlier vessel's lightweight displacement, and (B) the longitudinal center of gravity (LCG) differs by not more than 1 percent of the length between perpendiculars (LBP) of the earlier vessel's LCG, | The vertical center of gravity (VCG) of the earlier vessel is adopted by the sister vessel and used with the lightweight displacement and LCG determined from the deadweight survey of the sister vessel; |
| (iii) Neither paragraph (a)(6)(i) nor (ii) of this section apply because both the criteria in paragraphs (a)(6)(ii)(A) and (B) of this section are not met and lightweight characteristics were determined from a stability test on either the original vessel or a sister vessel, | The vessel must undergo a stability test in accordance with 46 CFR part 170, subpart F; |
| (iv) No vessel of the class of sister vessels previously underwent a stability test, | One vessel of the class must undergo a stability test in accordance with 46 CFR part 170, subpart F, and each sister vessel to which a stability standard applies must meet either paragraph (a)(6)(ii) or (iii) of this section. |

Table 144.155

(b) A statement that verifies sister vessel status for each element of paragraph (a) of this section from an individual or entity meeting the requirements of § 144.140 must be retained and produced upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

HAROLD WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff, Civil Action No.: 14-12820

Honorable Victoria A. Roberts

v. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford

 

DANIEL HARRIS, et. al. 

Defendants. 

__________________________________/

ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT

The Court held a settlement conference on February 3, 2015, which 

led the parties to agree to a settlement that was placed on the record. A 

status conference was held on June 3, 2015, during which the parties 

acknowledged that they had not taken the necessary steps toward 

executing the settlement. With the parties’ agreement, the Court set the 

following schedule:

• Plaintiff’s counsel must send via U.S. mail a revised settlement 

agreement to Defendant Daniel Harris by June 10, 2015;

• Within three days of receiving the revised settlement agreement, 

Harris must sign the agreement and return it to defense counsel;

• Upon receipt of the signed settlement agreement, Plaintiff’s counsel 

must turn over the titles of Harris’s vehicles to him;

2:14-cv-12820-VAR-MJH Doc # 19 Filed 06/04/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 86
• Upon receipt of the signed settlement agreement, Plaintiff’s counsel 

must also notify the Court, which will then recommend that an order 

of dismissal be entered that retains the Court’s jurisdiction for the 

limited purpose of enforcing the settlement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Elizabeth A. Stafford

ELIZABETH A. STAFFORD

United States Magistrate Judge

Dated: June 4, 2015

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES REGARDING OBJECTIONS

The parties’ attention is drawn to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), which 

provides a period of fourteen (14) days from the date of receipt of a copy of 

this order within which to file objections for consideration by the district 

judge under 28 U.S. C. §636(b)(1). 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served 

upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF 

System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses 

disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on June 4, 2015.

s/Marlena Williams

MARLENA WILLIAMS

Case Manager

2

2:14-cv-12820-VAR-MJH Doc # 19 Filed 06/04/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 87
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      14,949,714
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,193,732
<ALLOWANCES>                                    32,847
<INVENTORY>                                  9,305,027
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,794,809
<PP&E>                                       7,310,740
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,603,107
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,376,342
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        69,607
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,748,034
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,561,141
<SALES>                                     39,143,625
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            48,528,385
<CGS>                                       25,937,444
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,116,160
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,825,861
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             475,805
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,124,725
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,369,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,124,725
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,755,525
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          11,789
<SECURITIES>                                    14,880
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,231
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,015
<PP&E>                                           4,707
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,222
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,285
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           203
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,668
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,222
<SALES>                                         79,521
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,521
<CGS>                                           22,101
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,005
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,376)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,108)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,358)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,358)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)


</TABLE>
§ 15.1040 Massachusetts. The following U.S. navigable waters located within the State of Massachusetts when the vessel is in transit, but not bound to or departing from a port within the following listed operating areas: ( a ) Cape Cod Bay south of latitude 41°48′54′′ N;
( b ) The Cape Cod Canal; and
( c ) Buzzards Bay east of a line extending from the southernmost point of Wilbur Point (latitude 41°34′55′′ N longitude 70°51′15′′ W) to the easternmost point of Pasque Island (latitude 41°26′55′′ N longitude 70°50′30′′ W).
[CGD 92-061, 60 FR 24796, May 10, 1995, as amended by USCG-1998-4442, 63 FR 52189, Sept. 10, 1998]
- 2492
- 2493
- 2494
- 2495
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations as of and for
the nine months ended September 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         498,048
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  919,573
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,610,171
<PP&E>                                          29,138
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,861,498
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          624,178
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,371
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,222,704
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,861,498
<SALES>                                      2,011,615
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,019,774
<CGS>                                        1,420,009
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,420,009
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,198,750
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,753
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (635,738)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,473
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (638,211)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)



</TABLE>
§ 119.510 Bilge piping system. A vessel must be provided with a piping system that meets § 56.50-50 in subchapter F of this chapter, with the following exceptions: ( a ) The space forward of the collision bulkhead need not be fitted with a bilge suction line when the arrangement of the vessel is such that ordinary leakage may be removed from this compartment by the use of a hand portable bilge pump or other equipment, and such equipment is provided; and
( b ) The vessel need not comply with § 56.50-50(f) in subchapter F of this chapter.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 922, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51047, Sept. 30, 1997]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Achillion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Mary Kay Fenton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 3, 2009 |  | /s/ Mary Kay Fenton    
|                      |  | Mary Kay Fenton        
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
2:14-cv-14051-SFC-RSW   Doc # 1   Filed 10/21/14   Pg 1 of 9    Pg ID 1

2:14-cv-14051-SFC-RSW   Doc # 1   Filed 10/21/14   Pg 2 of 9    Pg ID 2

2:14-cv-14051-SFC-RSW   Doc # 1   Filed 10/21/14   Pg 3 of 9    Pg ID 3

2:14-cv-14051-SFC-RSW   Doc # 1   Filed 10/21/14   Pg 4 of 9    Pg ID 4

2:14-cv-14051-SFC-RSW   Doc # 1   Filed 10/21/14   Pg 5 of 9    Pg ID 5

2:14-cv-14051-SFC-RSW   Doc # 1   Filed 10/21/14   Pg 6 of 9    Pg ID 6

2:14-cv-14051-SFC-RSW   Doc # 1   Filed 10/21/14   Pg 7 of 9    Pg ID 7

2:14-cv-14051-SFC-RSW   Doc # 1   Filed 10/21/14   Pg 8 of 9    Pg ID 8

2:14-cv-14051-SFC-RSW   Doc # 1   Filed 10/21/14   Pg 9 of 9    Pg ID 9
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.021-6 Container. ( a ) *General.* Containers for stowage of hand red flare distress signals in lifeboats and life rafts on merchant vessels are not required to have specific approval or to be of special design, but they shall meet the following test for watertightness when closed, and shall be capable of being opened and reclosed hand-tight to meet the same watertightness test. The materials shall be copper, brass, bronze, or equally corrosion-resistant to salt water and spray. The type container illustrated by Figure Number 160.021-6(a) is recommended for most purposes.
( b ) *Watertightness test for containers.* Whenever a question arises as to the watertightness of a container, the following test may be made to determine whether it is satisfactory in this respect. Open the container, remove the contents, insert colored blotting paper as a lining, re-close container as tightly as possible by hand (no wrenches or special tools permitted), submerge container with top about 30 cm (1 ft.) below the surface of the water for two hours, remove container from water, wipe off excess moisture on outside, then open the container and examine the blotting paper and entire interior for evidence of moisture penetration. If any moisture or water is evidenced, the container is not satisfactory.
( c ) *Marking of container.* Containers shall be embossed or bear a brass or equivalent corrosion-resistant nameplate, or otherwise be suitably and permanently marked, to plainly show in letters not less than 13 mm (1 ⁄ 2 in.) high the following wording: “HAND RED FLARE DISTRESS SIGNALS”. No additional marking which might cause confusion as to the contents shall be permitted. The vessel's name ordinarily is painted or branded on equipment such as this container, and nothing in this subpart shall be construed as prohibiting same.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

No. 14-20533

Plaintiff,

District Judge Patrick J. Duggan

vs.

Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

PENKO NAYDENOV,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR BOND

Defendant Penko Naydenov is charged by information with use or control of a

scanning receiver, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(8). When he first appeared on a

criminal complaint, he was released on a $10,000 unsecured bond. On July 17, 2014, a

petition requesting a bond violation hearing was submitted to Magistrate Judge David

Grand, and a hearing was set for August 11, 2014. However, the hearing did not go

forward. Instead Defendant enrolled in and completed inpatient substance abuse treatment

at the Sacred Heart Rehabilitation Center. Defendant had previously been in treatment at

Sacred Heart as a condition of bond, but left the facility without permission on three

occasions to use heroin. He previously absconded from the facility and did not complete

the treatment regimen. 

Defendant appeared for arraignment on the information on September 8, 2014. At

that time, Judge Grand continued bond with a “zero tolerance” condition regarding use of

-1-

2:14-cr-20533-PJD-RSW Doc # 37 Filed 02/09/15 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 83
heroin or other illegal controlled substances. Based on Defendant’s subsequent use of

heroin, in violation of his bond conditions, Judge Duggan cancelled bond and issued a

warrant for Defendant’s arrest on September 18, 2014. The Defendant was arrested on the

warrant on October 20, 2014.

Before the Court at this time is Defendant’s Motion for Bond [Doc. #31], which

has been referred for hearing and determination pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). A

hearing was held on February 5, 2015. Having heard the arguments and proffers of

counsel for the respective parties, and having considered the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C.

§ 3142(g), including Defendant’s history of non-compliance with his conditions of bond 

and his serious and intractable heroin addiction, the Court finds that the government has

carried its burden of showing by a preponderance of the evidence that there are no

conditions or combinations thereof that will reasonably assure the Defendant’s

appearance as required, and has shown by clear and convincing evidence that there are no

conditions or combinations thereof that will reasonably assure that Defendant will not be

a danger to himself if released.

-2-

2:14-cr-20533-PJD-RSW Doc # 37 Filed 02/09/15 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 84
Therefore, for these reasons and the reasons stated on the record on February 5,

2015, Defendant’s motion for bond [Doc. #31] is DENIED.

This order may be appealed de novo to the District Judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/R. Steven Whalen 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dated: February 9, 2015

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on

February 9, 2015, electronically and/or by U.S. mail.

s/Carolyn M. Ciesla

Case Manager 

-3-

2:14-cr-20533-PJD-RSW Doc # 37 Filed 02/09/15 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 85
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Michael I. Roth, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The MONY Group Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosures controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):



a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



Date: May 10, 2004



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL I. ROTH            
|Michael I. Roth                   
|Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.901 Atmospheric control within cargo tanks and cargo piping systems. ( a ) Each vessel must have a piping system for purging each cargo tank and all cargo piping.
( b ) The piping system must minimize the pocketing of gas or air remaining after purging.
( c ) For cargo tanks certificated to carry flammable gases, the piping system must allow purging the tank of flammable vapors before air is introduced and purging the tank of air before the tank is filled with cargo.
( d ) Each cargo tank must have: ( 1 ) Gas sampling points at its top and bottom; and
( 2 ) Gas sampling line connections that are valved and capped above the deck.