# C_2008311EN.01003401.xml

| 5.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/34

---

REPORT

REPORT

on the annual accounts of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States for the financial year 2007 together with the Agency's replies

(2008/C 311/06)

CONTENTS

| 1-2 | INTRODUCTION |
| --- | --- |

1-2

| 3-6 | STATEMENT OF ASSURANCE |
| --- | --- |

3-6

| 7-12 | OBSERVATIONS |
| --- | --- |

7-12

Tables 1 to 4

The Agency's replies

The Agency's replies

INTRODUCTION

| 1. | The European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Members States (hereinafter referred to as the Agency) was created by Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 of the Council of 26 October 2004 (1). The Agency's main task is to coordinate Member States' activities in the field of management of external borders (support for operational cooperation, technical and operational assistance, risk analysis). |
| --- | --- |

1.

The European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Members States (hereinafter referred to as the Agency) was created by Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 of the Council of 26 October 2004 (1). The Agency's main task is to coordinate Member States' activities in the field of management of external borders (support for operational cooperation, technical and operational assistance, risk analysis).

1

| 2. | Table 1 summarises the Agency's competences and activities. Key data taken from the financial statements drawn up by the Agency for the financial year 2007 are presented in Tables 2, 3 and 4 for information purposes. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Table 1 summarises the Agency's competences and activities. Key data taken from the financial statements drawn up by the Agency for the financial year 2007 are presented in Tables 2, 3 and 4 for information purposes.

Table 1

Tables 2, 3 and 4

STATEMENT OF ASSURANCE

| 3. | This Statement is addressed to the European Parliament and the Council in accordance with Article 185(2) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 (2); it was drawn up following an examination of the Agency's accounts, as required by Article 248 of the Treaty establishing the European Community. |
| --- | --- |

3.

This Statement is addressed to the European Parliament and the Council in accordance with Article 185(2) of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 (2); it was drawn up following an examination of the Agency's accounts, as required by Article 248 of the Treaty establishing the European Community.

2

| 4. | The Agency's accounts for the financial year ended 31 December 2007 (3) were drawn up by its Executive Director, pursuant to Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004, and sent to the Court, which is required to give a Statement of Assurance on their reliability and on the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Agency's accounts for the financial year ended 31 December 2007 (3) were drawn up by its Executive Director, pursuant to Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004, and sent to the Court, which is required to give a Statement of Assurance on their reliability and on the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions.

3

| 5. | The Court conducted its audit in accordance with the IFAC and ISSAI (4) International Auditing Standards and Codes of Ethics, insofar as these are applicable in the European Community context. The audit was planned and performed to obtain reasonable assurance that the accounts are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Court conducted its audit in accordance with the IFAC and ISSAI (4) International Auditing Standards and Codes of Ethics, insofar as these are applicable in the European Community context. The audit was planned and performed to obtain reasonable assurance that the accounts are reliable and that the underlying transactions are legal and regular.

4

| 6. | The Court has thus obtained a reasonable basis for the Statement set out below:

  Reliability of the accountsThe Agency's accounts for the financial year ended 31 December 2007 are, in all material respects, reliable.Legality and regularity of the underlying transactionsThe transactions underlying the Agency's annual accounts, taken as a whole, are legal and regular.Without qualifying the above statements the Court draws attention to the observation in paragraph 8. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The Court has thus obtained a reasonable basis for the Statement set out below:

Reliability of the accountsThe Agency's accounts for the financial year ended 31 December 2007 are, in all material respects, reliable.Legality and regularity of the underlying transactionsThe transactions underlying the Agency's annual accounts, taken as a whole, are legal and regular.Without qualifying the above statements the Court draws attention to the observation in paragraph 8.

Reliability of the accountsThe Agency's accounts for the financial year ended 31 December 2007 are, in all material respects, reliable.Legality and regularity of the underlying transactionsThe transactions underlying the Agency's annual accounts, taken as a whole, are legal and regular.Without qualifying the above statements the Court draws attention to the observation in paragraph 8.

OBSERVATIONS

| 7. | Frontex's 2007 budget amounted to 42,1 million euro, as compared with 19,2 million euro for the previous year. This large increase was the result of 19,9 million euro being added to the initial budget of 22,2 million euro by the budget authorities in August 2007. The main expenses for operating activities concerned the coordination of joint operations regarding land, sea and air borders, risk assessments and training. The Agency's budget is mainly financed by subsidies from the Commission. 38,4 million euro of the 2007 commitment appropriations were consumed, including 13,3 million euro that were paid out and 22,4 million euro that were carried over. Non-automatic carry-overs amounted to 0,3 million euro. Unused appropriations of 6,4 million euro were cancelled. The appropriations carried over from the preceding year amounted to 11,8 million euro and 4,7 million euro of these were cancelled. Overall, nearly 70 % of the appropriations available for 2007 were not spent. This high level of carry-overs and cancellations indicates significant weaknesses in the programming and monitoring of the Agency's activities. |
| --- | --- |

7.

Frontex's 2007 budget amounted to 42,1 million euro, as compared with 19,2 million euro for the previous year. This large increase was the result of 19,9 million euro being added to the initial budget of 22,2 million euro by the budget authorities in August 2007. The main expenses for operating activities concerned the coordination of joint operations regarding land, sea and air borders, risk assessments and training. The Agency's budget is mainly financed by subsidies from the Commission. 38,4 million euro of the 2007 commitment appropriations were consumed, including 13,3 million euro that were paid out and 22,4 million euro that were carried over. Non-automatic carry-overs amounted to 0,3 million euro. Unused appropriations of 6,4 million euro were cancelled. The appropriations carried over from the preceding year amounted to 11,8 million euro and 4,7 million euro of these were cancelled. Overall, nearly 70 % of the appropriations available for 2007 were not spent. This high level of carry-overs and cancellations indicates significant weaknesses in the programming and monitoring of the Agency's activities.

| 8. | Commitments carried over to 2008 pertaining to grant agreements linked to operational activities (Title III) amounted to 18,4 million euro. A substantial part of these commitments were made on the basis of excessive costs estimations (5). As a consequence, it is likely that the budgetary surplus to be reimbursed to the Commission disclosed in the balance-sheet at the end of the year is understated. The financial impact, however, cannot be quantified with sufficient precision until the grant agreements concerned are closed. |
| --- | --- |

8.

Commitments carried over to 2008 pertaining to grant agreements linked to operational activities (Title III) amounted to 18,4 million euro. A substantial part of these commitments were made on the basis of excessive costs estimations (5). As a consequence, it is likely that the budgetary surplus to be reimbursed to the Commission disclosed in the balance-sheet at the end of the year is understated. The financial impact, however, cannot be quantified with sufficient precision until the grant agreements concerned are closed.

5

| 9. | Other reasons for the increase in carry-overs were that the partner countries were often very late in sending their final requests for reimbursement and that the Agency encountered difficulties in meeting payment deadlines. |
| --- | --- |

9.

Other reasons for the increase in carry-overs were that the partner countries were often very late in sending their final requests for reimbursement and that the Agency encountered difficulties in meeting payment deadlines.

| 10. | The high amount of cash detained by the Agency stays unused on excessively low interest bearing bank accounts (6) as no treasury management policy exists. |
| --- | --- |

10.

The high amount of cash detained by the Agency stays unused on excessively low interest bearing bank accounts (6) as no treasury management policy exists.

6

| 11. | An analysis of the Register of exceptions (7) clearly shows recurrent problems in the Agency's commitment system. Budgetary commitments were made after legal commitments (25 cases with a total amount of 1,5 million euro) and grant agreements with the partner countries were signed for actions already started or even closed (33 exceptions for a total amount of 8,6 million euro). |
| --- | --- |

11.

An analysis of the Register of exceptions (7) clearly shows recurrent problems in the Agency's commitment system. Budgetary commitments were made after legal commitments (25 cases with a total amount of 1,5 million euro) and grant agreements with the partner countries were signed for actions already started or even closed (33 exceptions for a total amount of 8,6 million euro).

7

| 12. | The rules applied for the implementing measures to the Staff Regulations concerning the minimum number of years of experience required for a given position differ from those agreed between the Agencies and the European Commission (8). This was at odds with the principle of equal treatment. |
| --- | --- |

12.

The rules applied for the implementing measures to the Staff Regulations concerning the minimum number of years of experience required for a given position differ from those agreed between the Agencies and the European Commission (8). This was at odds with the principle of equal treatment.

8

This report was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 24 and 25 September 2008.

For the Court of Auditors

Vítor Manuel da SILVA CALDEIRA

President

---

(1)  OJ L 349, 25.11.2004, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

2

(3)  These accounts were drawn up on 13 June 2008 and received by the Court on 27 June 2008.

3

(4)  International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) and International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions (ISSAI).

4

(5)  For 11 grant agreements closed in 2007, the Court estimated that the costs were overestimated by 30 % in average. The commitments carried over to 2008 could therefore be overestimated by an amount of approximately 5,5 million euro.

5

(6)  The funds are not only unused but also largely unproductive as they are placed on an account bearing only 0,7 % interest.

6

(7)  The Agency introduced the Register of Exceptions on 1 April 2007. The first entry was made on 30 May 2007. At 31 December 2007, the Register contains 64 exceptions linked to the operational activities.

7

(8)  As laid down in Article 110 of the Staff Regulations. For example, only 8 years of experience is required by the Agency for an AD 10 post whilst in all other Agencies 12 years is the norm.

8

---

Table 1

The European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders — Frontex (Warsaw)

| Areas of Community competence deriving from the Treaty | Competences of the Agency as defined in Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 | Governance | Resources made available to the Agency in 2007

  (2006) | Products and services supplied in 2007 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| The Community policy in this area aims at developing common standards and procedures with regard to carrying out checks on persons crossing the external borders of the Member States; furthermore measures should be taken to ensure cooperation between the relevant departments of the administrations of the Member States in the areas covered by this title, as well as between the Member States and the Commission.

  (Articles 62(2)(a) and 66 of the Treaty) | Objectives

  Frontex was established with a view to improving the integrated management of the external borders of the Member States of the EU.
  Frontex must:






  (a) | facilitate and render more effective the application of existing and future Community measures relating to the management of external borders. |

Areas of Community competence deriving from the Treaty

Competences of the Agency as defined in Council Regulation (EC) No 2007/2004

Governance

Resources made available to the Agency in 2007

(2006)

Products and services supplied in 2007

The Community policy in this area aims at developing common standards and procedures with regard to carrying out checks on persons crossing the external borders of the Member States; furthermore measures should be taken to ensure cooperation between the relevant departments of the administrations of the Member States in the areas covered by this title, as well as between the Member States and the Commission.

(Articles 62(2)(a) and 66 of the Treaty)

Objectives

Frontex was established with a view to improving the integrated management of the external borders of the Member States of the EU.

Frontex must:

(a)

facilitate and render more effective the application of existing and future Community measures relating to the management of external borders.

| (b) | ensure the coordination of Member States' actions in the implementation of those measures, thereby contributing to an efficient, high and uniform level of control on persons and surveillance of the external borders of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

ensure the coordination of Member States' actions in the implementation of those measures, thereby contributing to an efficient, high and uniform level of control on persons and surveillance of the external borders of the Member States.

| (c) | provide the Commission and the Member States with the necessary technical support and expertise in the management of the external borders and promote solidarity between Member States. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

provide the Commission and the Member States with the necessary technical support and expertise in the management of the external borders and promote solidarity between Member States.

Main tasks:

| (1) | to coordinate operational cooperation between Member States in the field of management of external borders; |
| --- | --- |

(1)

to coordinate operational cooperation between Member States in the field of management of external borders;

| (2) | to assist Member States on training of national border guards and establish common training standards; |
| --- | --- |

(2)

to assist Member States on training of national border guards and establish common training standards;

| (3) | to carry out risk analysis; |
| --- | --- |

(3)

to carry out risk analysis;

| (4) | to follow up on the development of research in control and surveillance; |
| --- | --- |

(4)

to follow up on the development of research in control and surveillance;

| (5) | to assist Member States in circumstances requiring increased technical and operational assistance; |
| --- | --- |

(5)

to assist Member States in circumstances requiring increased technical and operational assistance;

| (6) | to provide Member States with the necessary support in organising joint return operations. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

to provide Member States with the necessary support in organising joint return operations.

1.   Management Board

Composed of:

| — | One representative from each Member State; |
| --- | --- |

—

One representative from each Member State;

| — | Two representatives from the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

—

Two representatives from the Commission;

| — | One representative per Schengen associated country (Norway, Iceland) with a limited right to vote. |
| --- | --- |

—

One representative per Schengen associated country (Norway, Iceland) with a limited right to vote.

2.   Executive Director

Appointed, on a proposal by the Commission, by the Management Board.

3.   External audit

European Court of Auditors.

4.   Discharge authority

Parliament acting on recommendation from the Council.

Final budget for 2007

42,2 (19,2) million euro

Community contribution:

40,1 million euro or 97,2 % (18,9 million euro or 98,8 %)

Contribution from the UK & IE:

0,8 million euro or 1,9 % (0,2 million euro or 1,2 %)

Contribution from SAC:

0,9 million euro or 2,1 %

Staff numbers at 31 December 2007

In the Establishment Plan: 49 (28)

Temporary staff 48 (25)

Total staff number: 132 (72)

+84 (47) other staff (seconded national experts, contract staff, auxiliaries).

Assigned to the following tasks:

| — | operational: 103 (43) |
| --- | --- |

—

operational: 103 (43)

| — | administrative: 29 (29) |
| --- | --- |

—

administrative: 29 (29)

Risk analysis:

2 General/Annual Assessments were produced;

21 Tailored Assessments were finalised or are due to be finalised by end Q1 2008;

40 Analytical ex-ante assessments of Frontex Joint Operations were issued;

2 Law Enforcement and 3 public bulletins were produced.

The system for regular exchange of information (Incident Reporting System-IRS, Monthly Analytical Reports and Monthly Statistical reports) within Frontex Risk Analysis Network was launched.

Operational cooperation:

25 Frontex coordinated joint operations were held; 7 Pilot projects were launched.

Assistance to the MS':

Frontex assisted Member States in 10 of their return operations on their request and coordinated and co-financed 9 return operations of Member States.

Assistance return operations:

Frontex coordinated and co-financed 9 return operations of Member States.

Training:

Within the framework of 13 projects 39 meetings were held or co-financed. During 38 training sessions of different durations, 600 border guards of different level were trained.

Research & development:

8 reports and bulletins were published;

5 workshops on R&D issues were held;

9 projects were initiated; some of them are still ongoing;

18 meeting, conferences, or seminars were attended.

Cooperation with non-EU partner countries:

The Management Board mandated Frontex to negotiate working arrangements with 5 countries (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Cape Verde, Egypt, Moldavia, Georgia);

Working arrangement with Ukraine was signed;

Involvement of Russia and Ukraine in 2 IBM seminars;

Ukraine was involved in 5 Frontex pilot projects.

Cooperation with Europol and other relevant organisations:

Frontex contributed to Europol's ‘Organised Crime Threat Assessment’ (‘OCTA’).

The established working level cooperation with numerous organisations (e.g. IOM, UNHCR, OLAF, Eurojust) was further maintained and utilized.

Source: Information submitted by the Agency.

Table 2

Frontex- European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders (Warsaw) — Implementation of the budget for the financial year 2007

| (1000 euro) |
| --- |
| Revenue | Expenditure |
| Source of revenue | Revenue entered in the final budget for the financial year | Revenue collected | Allocation of expenditure | Final budget appropriations | Appropriations carried over from the previous financial year |
| final | committed | paid | carried over | cancelled | available | paid | cancelled |
| Community subsidies | 40 980 | 40 991 | Title I
  Staff | 9 387 | 7 767 | 6 332 | 1 435 | 1 620 | 1 065 | 417 | 648 |
| Other subsidies | 1 170 | 820 | Title II
  Administration | 5 267 | 4 018 | 1 765 | 2 593 (1) | 909 (1) | 931 | 726 | 205 |
| Other revenue | p.m. | 9 | Title III
  Operating activities | 27 496 | 26 599 | 5 214 | 18 399 | 3 884 | 9 778 | 5 942 | 3 836 |
| Total | 42 150 | 41 820 | Total | 42 150 | 38 384 | 13 312 | 22 426 | 6 413 | 11 774 | 7 085 | 4 689 |
| Source: Data supplied by the Agency. This table summarises the data provided by the Agency in its annual accounts. Revenue collected and payments are estimated on a cash basis. |

(1000 euro)

Revenue

Expenditure

Source of revenue

Revenue entered in the final budget for the financial year

Revenue collected

Allocation of expenditure

Final budget appropriations

Appropriations carried over from the previous financial year

final

committed

paid

carried over

cancelled

available

paid

cancelled

Community subsidies

40 980

40 991

Title I

Staff

9 387

7 767

6 332

1 435

1 620

1 065

417

648

Other subsidies

1 170

820

Title II

Administration

5 267

4 018

1 765

2 593 (1)

909 (1)

931

726

205

Other revenue

p.m.

9

Title III

Operating activities

27 496

26 599

5 214

18 399

3 884

9 778

5 942

3 836

Total

42 150

41 820

Total

42 150

38 384

13 312

22 426

6 413

11 774

7 085

4 689

Source: Data supplied by the Agency. This table summarises the data provided by the Agency in its annual accounts. Revenue collected and payments are estimated on a cash basis.

Table 3

The European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders (Warsaw) — Economic outturn account for the financial year 2007 and 2006

| (1000 euro) |
| --- |
| | 2007 | 2006 |
| Operating revenue |
| Community subsidies | 30 439 | 15 129 |
| Contribution from countries | 1 738 | 226 |
| Miscellanous | 127 | 26 |
| Total (a) | 32 304 | 15 381 |
| Operating expenditure |
| Staff expenditure | 4 090 | 860 |
| Fixed asset-related expenditure | 78 | 7 |
| Other administrative expenditure | 4 931 | 613 |
| Operational expenditure | 20 887 | 4 349 |
| Total (b) | 29 986 | 5 829 |
| Surplus /(deficit) from operating activities (c = a – b) | 2 318 | 9 552 |
| Financial operations expenditure (d) | 1 | 5 |
| Surplus/(deficit) from non-operating activities (e = – d) | –1 | –5 |
| Economic result for the year (f = c + e) | 2 317 | 9 547 |
| Source: Data supplied by the Agency. This table summarises the data provided by the Agency in its annual accounts: these accounts are drawn up on an accrual basis. |

(1000 euro)

2007

2006

Operating revenue

Community subsidies

30 439

15 129

Contribution from countries

1 738

226

Miscellanous

127

26

Total (a)

32 304

15 381

Operating expenditure

Staff expenditure

4 090

860

Fixed asset-related expenditure

78

7

Other administrative expenditure

4 931

613

Operational expenditure

20 887

4 349

Total (b)

29 986

5 829

Surplus /(deficit) from operating activities (c = a – b)

2 318

9 552

Financial operations expenditure (d)

1

5

Surplus/(deficit) from non-operating activities (e = – d)

–1

–5

Economic result for the year (f = c + e)

2 317

9 547

Source: Data supplied by the Agency. This table summarises the data provided by the Agency in its annual accounts: these accounts are drawn up on an accrual basis.

Table 4

The European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders (Warsaw) — Balance sheet at 31 December 2007 and 2006

| (1000 euro) |
| --- |
| | 2007 | 2006 |
| Non-current assets |
| Intangible fixed assets | 103 | 0 |
| Tangible fixed assets | 588 | 31 |
| Current assets |
| Short-term prefinancing | 40 | 0 |
| Short-term receivables | 1 457 | 75 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 32 637 | 14 236 |
| Total assets | 34 825 | 14 342 |
| Current liabilities |
| Provisions for risks and charges | 75 | 84 |
| Accounts payable | 22 886 | 4 711 |
| Total liabilities | 22 961 | 4 795 |
| Net assets | 11 864 | 9 547 |
| Reserve |
| Accumulated surplus/deficit | 9 547 | 0 |
| Economic result for the year | 2 317 | 9 547 |
| Net capital | 11 864 | 9 547 |
| Source: Data supplied by the Agency. This table summarises the data provided by the Agency in its annual accounts: these accounts are drawn up on an accrual basis. |

(1000 euro)

2007

2006

Non-current assets

Intangible fixed assets

103

0

Tangible fixed assets

588

31

Current assets

Short-term prefinancing

40

0

Short-term receivables

1 457

75

Cash and cash equivalents

32 637

14 236

Total assets

34 825

14 342

Current liabilities

Provisions for risks and charges

75

84

Accounts payable

22 886

4 711

Total liabilities

22 961

4 795

Net assets

11 864

9 547

Reserve

Accumulated surplus/deficit

9 547

0

Economic result for the year

2 317

9 547

Net capital

11 864

9 547

Source: Data supplied by the Agency. This table summarises the data provided by the Agency in its annual accounts: these accounts are drawn up on an accrual basis.

---

(1)  Includes non-automatic carry-overs of 340 000 euro.

Source: Data supplied by the Agency. This table summarises the data provided by the Agency in its annual accounts. Revenue collected and payments are estimated on a cash basis.

---

THE AGENCY'S REPLIES

| 7. | The 19,9 million euro increase of the budget is based on two amendments:






  (1) | 12,8 million euro of the initial budget were frozen by the Budget Authority and were effectively made available in June 2007 only; and thus commitments were only possible in the second half of 2007. |
| --- | --- | --- |

7.

The 19,9 million euro increase of the budget is based on two amendments:

(1)

12,8 million euro of the initial budget were frozen by the Budget Authority and were effectively made available in June 2007 only; and thus commitments were only possible in the second half of 2007.

| (2) | 7 million euro were made available by the Commission in June 2007 in order to be used especially for Sea Border operations. As these operations require the availability of vessels and aircrafts from Member States and, due to their complexity, oblige to an important and time consuming effort of coordination, commitments could only be made late in 2007. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

7 million euro were made available by the Commission in June 2007 in order to be used especially for Sea Border operations. As these operations require the availability of vessels and aircrafts from Member States and, due to their complexity, oblige to an important and time consuming effort of coordination, commitments could only be made late in 2007.

This situation affected the volume of payments in 2007 and led to significant carry-overs.

However, the Agency underlines that the monitoring of the expenditure has improved significantly in 2007. Monthly budget implementation reports have been prepared and are distributed to the management.

| 8. | The estimation of costs is a complex issue and a stricter budget management is going to be implemented to solve this problem. Frontex started to build up the centralised record for technical equipment (CRATE). This record lists equipment from Member States that can be used during joint operations and is linked to a common cost calculation method (REM). The REM concept will be used and assessed during 2008/2009 and shall lead to a more efficient use of the budgetary allocation. In addition Frontex started to introduce phases into its long term operations, aiming to ease the budget management. |
| --- | --- |

8.

The estimation of costs is a complex issue and a stricter budget management is going to be implemented to solve this problem. Frontex started to build up the centralised record for technical equipment (CRATE). This record lists equipment from Member States that can be used during joint operations and is linked to a common cost calculation method (REM). The REM concept will be used and assessed during 2008/2009 and shall lead to a more efficient use of the budgetary allocation. In addition Frontex started to introduce phases into its long term operations, aiming to ease the budget management.

| 9. | Frontex and Member States have agreed in the Framework Partnership Agreement (FPA) that the Member State will send in claims for reimbursement within 45 days after the action has ended. However, given the difficulties of Member States to collect all invoices in due time, the Agency does not refuse payment in case a claim is received later than 45 days. The Executive Director made the members of the Management Board repeatedly aware of this problem during their meetings.
  Since early 2008, reminders are sent systematically to participating Member States.
  Starting mid 2008 Frontex will distribute to all Member States on a monthly basis an overview of all the payments.
  In addition, Frontex units/sectors are informed on a monthly basis on pending invoices. |
| --- | --- |

9.

Frontex and Member States have agreed in the Framework Partnership Agreement (FPA) that the Member State will send in claims for reimbursement within 45 days after the action has ended. However, given the difficulties of Member States to collect all invoices in due time, the Agency does not refuse payment in case a claim is received later than 45 days. The Executive Director made the members of the Management Board repeatedly aware of this problem during their meetings.

Since early 2008, reminders are sent systematically to participating Member States.

Starting mid 2008 Frontex will distribute to all Member States on a monthly basis an overview of all the payments.

In addition, Frontex units/sectors are informed on a monthly basis on pending invoices.

| 10. | The Agency will try to re-negotiate with its bank the conditions and examine if other banks may offer better conditions. |
| --- | --- |

10.

The Agency will try to re-negotiate with its bank the conditions and examine if other banks may offer better conditions.

| 11. | As the development until the end of June 2008 showed no improvements in absolute numbers of exceptions reported, an action plan was developed; this action plan is aiming at improving the situation by e.g. setting deadlines to Member States for forwarding to the agency budget estimation on their co-financing to establish the final amount for grants in order to avoid ex-post signatures. Other measures envisaged are the setting up of a commitment monitoring system for Project managers and eventually the use of an IT supported tool. |
| --- | --- |

11.

As the development until the end of June 2008 showed no improvements in absolute numbers of exceptions reported, an action plan was developed; this action plan is aiming at improving the situation by e.g. setting deadlines to Member States for forwarding to the agency budget estimation on their co-financing to establish the final amount for grants in order to avoid ex-post signatures. Other measures envisaged are the setting up of a commitment monitoring system for Project managers and eventually the use of an IT supported tool.

| 12. | The Agency applied the principles in analogy with Article 31, paragraph 2 of the Staff Regulations which stipulates that in order to address specific needs of the Institutions, labor market conditions prevailing in the Community may also be taken into account when recruiting.
  The Agency must attract highly qualified specialists in various fields and particular in law enforcement and therefore needs to offer an attractive grading and salary for the posts in question taking into account the negative impact of the correction coefficient for salaries applied for Poland. |
| --- | --- |

12.

The Agency applied the principles in analogy with Article 31, paragraph 2 of the Staff Regulations which stipulates that in order to address specific needs of the Institutions, labor market conditions prevailing in the Community may also be taken into account when recruiting.

The Agency must attract highly qualified specialists in various fields and particular in law enforcement and therefore needs to offer an attractive grading and salary for the posts in question taking into account the negative impact of the correction coefficient for salaries applied for Poland.

---