alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 159.005-9 Approval inspections and tests. ( a ) Each manufacturer of equipment or material that is required to be subjected to approval inspections and tests must— ( 1 ) If the applicable subpart requires the equipment or material to be inspected or tested, have the approval inspections or tests performed;
( 2 ) If the applicable subpart requires the equipment or material to be inspected or tested by an independent laboratory, insure that a laboratory accepted by the Commandant performs or supervises the approval inspections or tests;
( 3 ) Bear all costs of the approval inspections and tests;
( 4 ) If requested, advise the Commandant of the time, date, and place of each approval inspection or test, or both, before the inspection or test is performed; and
( 5 ) After completion of the approval inspections and tests, submit to the Commandant— ( i ) A test report that meets § 159.005-11;
( ii ) At least two sets of specifications of the material as inspected or tested or at least two sets of plans of the equipment as inspected or tested that meet § 159.005-12; and
( iii ) A description of the quality control procedures that will be in effect during the production of the equipment or material.
( b ) [Reserved]
[CGD 76-048, 44 FR 73043, Dec. 17, 1979, as amended by USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58285, Sept. 29, 2014]
# C_2011331EN.01001302.xml

| 12.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/13

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 14 September 2011 — SIA ‘Garkalns’ v Rīgas dome

(Case C-470/11)

2011/C 331/23

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Referring court

Augstākās tiesas Senāts

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: SIA ‘Garkalns’

Appellant:

Respondent: Rīgas dome

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 49 EC and the related obligation of transparency be interpreted as meaning that the use, in a law that has been enacted publicly and in advance, of an imprecise legal concept such as ‘substantial impairment of the interests of the State and of the residents of the administrative area concerned’ — a concept which has to be defined in each individual case in which it applies with the help of interpretative guidelines but which at the same time allows a degree of flexibility in the assessment of restrictions on the freedom to provide services — is compatible with the permissible restrictions on that freedom?

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I,
Michael C. Frederick, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                   |  |     |  |                                                                                                                               
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|DATE: May 13, 2004 |  | BY: |  | /s/ Michael C. Frederick                                                                                                      
|                   |  |     |  | Michael C. Frederick Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### § 168.10-1 Nautical school vessels.

The term *nautical school vessel* means a vessel operated by or in connection with a nautical school or an educational institution under Section 13 of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 1986.

[CGD 84-069, 61 FR 25312, May 20, 1996]
#### § 708.2 Policy.

It is the policy of the Commission to apply the procedures in the regulations in this part uniformly and consistently in the collection of internal debts from its current and former employees.
EXHIBIT 23.2
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-11453, 333-65204, 333-67799, 333-74772,333-91964) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-71238) of Onyx Acceptance Corporationof our report dated February 13, 2003, except for the effects ofthe restatement described in Note 2 for which the date isMarch 30, 2004, relating to the financial statements as of andfor each of the two years ended December 31, 2002, which appearsin this Form 10-K.
**PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP**
Orange County, California
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting;
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
controls over financial reporting.
 Dated:  December __, 2009
    By:
    /s/   David Bruce HongDavid Bruce HongChief Executive Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.1755 Nitrogen.

Except for deck tanks and their piping systems, cargo containment systems and piping systems carrying nitrogen must be specially approved by the Commandant (CG-OES).

[CGD 74-289, 44 FR 26009, May 3, 1979, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4782, Feb. 3, 1983]
MIE 1A 

Revised 07/12

Order of the Court to Continue Supervision 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

for the 

Eastern District of Michigan 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

Damon D. Easley Crim. No.: 14-CR-20771-01 

On 05/06/2015 the Court authorized the issuance of a supervised release summons based upon a violation 

petition citing violations of supervision. The issues of the violations were heard in Court on 05/27/2015, and 

the Court made the following findings: 

X Guilty of violating the following conditions of supervision: 

1. Violation of Mandatory Condition: The defendant shall not unlawfully possess a controlled 

substance. 

2. Violation of Standard Condition No. 3: The defendant shall answer truthfully all inquiries by the 

probation officer and follow the instructions of the probation officer. 

3. Violation of Standard Condition No. 5: The defendant shall work regularly at a lawful occupation, 

unless excused by the probation officer for schooling, training, or other acceptable reasons. 

 The following special conditions of supervision are added: 

1. The offender shall reside at a Residential Reentry Center (RRC), CTC West, for up to 120 days. The 

offender shall abide by all rules and regulations of the RRC and subsistence is waived due to the 

offender’s lack of income. Personal passes may be approved by the probation officer. 

2. Zero Tolerance. 

Respectfully submitted, 

s/Ann R. Smith 

Sr. United States Probation Officer 

(313) 234-5461 

ORDER OF THE COURT

Pursuant to the above, it is ordered that the pending violation matter be resolved and 

supervision in this case be continued. All conditions imposed at the time of 

sentencing, along with any subsequent modifications to those conditions, remain in 

effect. 

Dated this 3rd Day of June, 2015. 

s/Matthew F. Leitman 

Matthew F. Leitman 

United States District Judge 

2:14-cr-20771-MFL Doc # 9 Filed 06/03/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 44
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 151.45-3 Manning.

Except as provided for in this section, barges need not be manned unless in the judgment of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, such manning is necessary for the protection of life and property and for safe operation of the vessel. Vessels requiring manning for safe operation shall be subject to additional requirements as determined by the Commandant. Towing vessels, while towing barges which are not required to be manned, shall be provided with and have on board the information card required by § 151.45-2(e)(3). This card shall be in the possession of the master or person in charge.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2063 

To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 to use repaid 

Troubled Asset Relief Program funds to pay down the public debt, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2009 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 

2008 to use repaid Troubled Asset Relief Program funds 

to pay down the public debt, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PUBLIC DEBT REDUCTION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title I of the Emergency Eco5 nomic Stabilization Act of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5201 et seq.) 

6 is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 137. PUBLIC DEBT REDUCTION. 

8 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Each time a financial institution 

9 makes a repayment of assistance provided under this title, 


jbell on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2063 IH

1 the Secretary shall transfer such repayment to the special 

2 account established by section 3113(d) of title 31, United 

3 States Code. 

4 ‘‘(b) TARP AUTHORIZATION REDUCTION.—Each 

5 time a financial institution makes a repayment of assist6 ance provided under this title, the authorization to pur7 chase authority under section 115 shall be reduced by a 

8 corresponding dollar amount.’’. 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of con10 tents for such Act is amended by inserting after the item 

11 relating to section 136 the following new item: 

‘‘137. Public debt reduction.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.010-5 Buoyant apparatus with plastic foam buoyancy. ( a ) Buoyant apparatus with plastic foam buoyancy must have a plastic foam body with an external protective covering. The body may be reinforced as necessary to meet the tests in § 160.010-7.
( b ) Plastic foam used in the construction of buoyant apparatus must be a unicellular type accepted by the Commandant (CG-ENG-4) as meeting one of the following: ( 1 ) Subpart 164.015 of this chapter.
( 2 ) MIL-P-19644C (incorporated by reference, see § 160.010-1 of this subpart).
( 3 ) MIL-P-21929B (incorporated by reference, see § 160.010-1 of this subpart).
( 4 ) MIL-P-40619A (incorporated by reference, see § 160.010-1 of this subpart).
( c ) The external protective covering must be— ( 1 ) Fibrous-glass-reinforced plastic, constructed of a polyester resin listed on the current Qualified Products List for MIL-P-21607E(SH) (incorporated by reference, see § 160.010-1 of this subpart), or accepted by the Commandant (CG-ENG-4) as meeting MIL-P-21607;
( 2 ) Elastomeric vinyl accepted by the Commandant (CG-ENG-4) as meeting § 160.055-3(j) of this chapter; or
( 3 ) Any other material accepted by the Commandant (CG-ENG-4) as providing equivalent protection for the body of the apparatus.
[CGD 79-167, 47 FR 41372, Sept. 20, 1982, as amended by CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50733, Sept. 27, 1996. Redesignated by CGD 85-205, 62 FR 25545, May 9, 1997, as amended by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49237, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2010-0048, 76 FR 62975, Oct. 11, 2011]
**Exhibit 23.01**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports datedOctober 11, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of IDT Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2011. We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of IDT Corporation on the following Forms S-3 (File No. 333-53719, effective May 27, 1998, File No. 333-61565, effective August 14, 1998, FileNo. 333-71991, effective April 16, 1999, File No. 333-77395, effective April 29, 1999, File No. 333-80133, effective June 7, 1999, File No. 333-86261, effective August 31, 1999, File No. 333-104286,effective March 19, 2004, File No. 333-115403, effective May 12, 2004, and File No. 333-119190, effective September 22, 2004) and Forms S-8 (File No. 333-73167, effective March 1, 1999, File No. 333-100424,effective October 8, 2002, File No. 333-105865, effective June 5, 2003, File No. 333-116266, effective June 8, 2004, File No. 333-130287, effective December 13, 2005, File No. 333-130288, effectiveDecember 13, 2005, File No. 333-130562, effective December 21, 2005, File No. 333-146718, effective October 15, 2007, and File No. 333-154257, effective October 14, 2008). 

 

October 11, 2011
#### § 122.900 Penalty for violations.

Violation of the provisions of this subchapter will subject the violator to the applicable penalty provisions of Subtitle II of Title 46, United States Code.

[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 935, Jan. 10, 1996; 61 FR 20556, May 7, 1996]
- 3147
- 3148
- 3149
- 3150
- 3151
- 3152
- 3153
- 3154
- 3155
- 3156
- 3157
- 3158
- 3159
- 3160
- 3161
- 3162
- 3163
- 3164
- 3165
- 3166
- 3167
- 3168
- 3169
- 3170
- 3171
- 3172
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 151.04-7 Nondestructive testing. ( a ) Before nondestructive testing may be conducted to meet § 151.04-5 (d) and (l), the owner shall submit a proposal to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection that includes— ( 1 ) The test methods and procedures to be used all of which must meet section V of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (1986);
( 2 ) Each location on the tank to be tested; and
( 3 ) The test method and procedure to be conducted at each location on the tank.
( b ) If the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection rejects the proposal, the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection informs the owner of the reasons why the proposal is rejected.
( c ) If the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection accepts the proposal, then the owner shall ensure that— ( 1 ) The proposal is followed; and
( 2 ) Nondestructive testing is performed by personnel meeting ASNT “Recommended Practice No. SNT-TC-1A (1988), Personnel Qualification and Certification in Nondestructive Testing.”
( d ) Within 30 days after completing the nondestructive test, the owner shall submit a written report of the results to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
[CGD 85-061, 54 FR 50966, Dec. 11, 1989]
#### § 169.255 Sanitary inspection.

At each inspection for certification, periodic inspection, and annual inspection quarters, toilet and washing spaces, galleys, serving pantries, lockers, etc., are examined to determine that they are serviceable and in a sanitary condition.

[CGD 83-005, 51 FR 896, Jan. 9, 1986, as amended by USCG-1999-4976, 65 FR 6508, Feb. 9, 2000]
Case 2:14-mj-30499-DUTY ECF No. 1, PageID.1 Filed 09/26/14 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:14-mj-30499-DUTY ECF No. 1, PageID.2 Filed 09/26/14 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:14-mj-30499-DUTY ECF No. 1, PageID.3 Filed 09/26/14 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:14-mj-30499-DUTY ECF No. 1, PageID.4 Filed 09/26/14 Page 4 of 4
# C_2011311EN.01001503.xml

| 22.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/15

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 27 May 2011 — Dansk Funktionærforbund, Serviceforbundet, acting on behalf of Frank Frandsen v Cimber Air A/S

(Case C-266/11)

2011/C 311/24

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Referring court

Vestre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Dansk Funktionærforbund, Serviceforbundet, acting on behalf of Frank Frandsen

Applicant:

Defendant: Cimber Air A/S

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Council Directive 2000/78/EC (1) to be interpreted as meaning that the prohibition on all forms of discrimination on grounds of age precludes national rules from upholding a collective agreement between an airline company and the trade organisation representing that company’s pilots which provides for compulsory retirement at 60 years of age, when that agreement provision, which applied also before the entry into force of the Council Directive and before the entry into force of the national implementing legislation, has as its purpose the protection of aviation safety on the basis of a general consideration of reduced performance ability with age, without a specific assessment of the individual pilot’s performance ability, but such that the individual pilot may apply to be allowed to continue in his employment for a year at a time following approval by a committee made up of employer and employee representatives?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 162
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 162.027-2 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce any edition other than that specified in this section, the Coast Guard must publish a notice of change in the Federal Register and the material must be available to the public. All approved material is available for inspection at the U.S. Coast Guard, Office of Design and Engineering Standards (CG-ENG), 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, and is available from the sources listed below. It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( b ) ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428, 877-909-2786, *http://www.astm.org .* ( 1 ) ASTM F1546/F1546 M-96 (Reapproved 2012), Standard Specification for Fire Hose Nozzles, approved May 1, 2012, (“ASTM F 1546”), IBR approved for §§ 162.027-3(a) through (c), and 162.027-4(a) and (d).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( c ) National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169, 617-770-3000, *http://www.nfpa.org*. ( 1 ) NFPA 1964 Standard for Spray Nozzles, 2008 Edition, effective December 31, 2007, IBR approved for §§ 162.027-3(a) through (c), and 162.027-4(a) and (d).
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48277, July 22, 2016]
# C_2012025EN.01003104.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/31

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Rheinland-Pfalz (Germany) lodged on 24 October 2011 — Helga Petersen, Peter Petersen v Finanzamt Ludwigshafen

(Case C-544/11)

(2012/C 25/57)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Rheinland-Pfalz

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Helga Petersen, Peter Petersen

Defendant: Finanzamt Ludwigshafen

Question referred

Is a legal provision compatible with Article 49 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (in the version of the Nice Treaty signed on 26 February 2001; now Article 56 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) if it makes a tax exemption for income of an employee who is taxable in Germany dependent on the employer being established in Germany, but does not provide for such exemption if the employer is established in another EU Member State?

---