alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      1565
<PP&E>                                              193961
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (110299)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       85527
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               535223
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                              9883
<OTHER-SE>                                         (459579)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         85527
<SALES>                                             181000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    181000
<CGS>                                              (216870)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     (1395297)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (494813)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  (12964)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (1938944)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (1938944)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.21)
        



</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit 

No. 20-40132 

Conference Calendar 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Jaime Azpeitia-Rodriguez, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 7:19-CR-2012-1 

Before King, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges. 

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jaime AzpeitiaRodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Azpeitia-Rodriguez has not filed a response. We 

*

 Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

May 17, 2021 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 20-40132 Document: 00515864598 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/17/2021
No. 20-40132 

2 

have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from 

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 20-40132 Document: 00515864598 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/17/2021
###### Editorial Note on Part 162

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 162.050-39 Measurement of oil content.

The collection and testing of all samples of oil in water from the required test will be accomplished in accordance with ISO 9377-2 (2000), Water Quality—Determination of hydrocarbon oil index-Part 2: Method Using solvent extraction and Gas Chromatography (incorporated by reference, see § 162.050-4).

[USCG-2004-18939, 74 FR 3393, Jan. 16, 2009]
# C_2014039EN.01002701.xml

| 8.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/27

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 12 December 2013 — BV v Commission

st

(Case F-133/11) (1)

1

(Civil service - Appointment - Candidates entered on reserve lists for competitions the notice for which was published prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations - Classification in grade - Principle of equal treatment - Discrimination on grounds of age - Freedom of movement for persons)

2014/C 39/48

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: BV (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: P. Goergen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener: Council of the European Union (represented by: J. Herrmann and A.F. Jensen, Agents)

Intervener:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the Commission’s decision classifying the applicant — entered on the reserve list for competition EPSO/A/17/04, the notice for which was published prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations — at Grade AD 6, step 2, pursuant to less advantageous provisions.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders BV to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders BV to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 133, 5.5.2013, p. 29.

1

---
#### § 108.430 General.

Automatic sprinkler systems must comply with Chapter 25 of NFPA 13 (incorporated by reference, see § 108.101).

[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48266, July 22, 2016]
#### § 130.250 Mooring and towing equipment for OSVs of less than 100 gross tons.

Each OSV of less than 100 gross tons must be fitted with mooring and towing equipment meeting the applicable requirements for small passenger vessels in § 184.300 of this chapter.
Editorial Note on Part 161
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 161 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49238, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 161.013-11 Prototype test. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76704 , Sept. 18, 2024.
( a ) Each manufacturer must test a prototype light identical to the lights to be certified prior to the labeling required by § 161.013-13.
( b ) If the prototype light fails to meet any of the general performance requirements of § 161.013-3 the lights must not be certified under this subpart.
( c ) Each manufacturer must: ( 1 ) Forward the test results within 30 days to the Commandant (CG-ENG), Attn: Office of Design and Engineering Systems, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509; and
( 2 ) Retain records of the test results for at least 5 years, or as long as the light is manufactured and certified, whichever is longer.
[CGD 76-183a, 44 FR 73054, Dec. 17, 1979, as amended by CGD 88-070, 53 FR 34536, Sept. 7, 1988; CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50467, Sept. 29, 1995; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50734, Sept. 27, 1996; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60160, Sept. 30, 2013]
# C_2011186EN.01003702.xml

| 25.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/37

---

Action brought on 2 May 2011 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-53/11)

2011/C 186/71

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, E. Marchal and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to list the applicant as a successful candidate in competition EPSO/AD/168/09-PL.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the selection board in competition EPSO/AD/168/09-PL not to list the applicant as a successful candidate in that competition; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the selection board in competition EPSO/AD/168/09-PL not to list the applicant as a successful candidate in that competition;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
Editorial Note on Part 150
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 150 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59783, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 150.150 Exceptions to the compatibility chart. The Commandant (CG-ENG-5) authorizes, on a case by case basis, exceptions to the rules in this subpart under the following conditions: ( a ) When two cargoes shown to be incompatible in Figure 1 meet the standards for a compatible pair in Appendix III, or
( b ) When two cargoes shown to be compatible in Figure 1 meet the standards for an incompatible pair in Appendix III.
Appendix I contains cargoes which have been found to be exceptions to Figure 1, the Compatibility Chart. [CGD 83-047, 50 FR 33038, Aug. 16, 1985, as amended at CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50731, Sept. 27, 1996]
Stephen E. Earle MD and 

Stephen E. Earle MD s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 28, 2014

No. 04-13-00753-CV

Robert SCHRADE,

Appellant

v.

Stephen E. EARLE MD and Stephen E. Earle MD PA,

Appellees

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-03779

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Motion for 

Rehearing is GRANTED. The motion for rehearing is due on July 31, 2014.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of July, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.142-3 Testing, marking, and inspection requirements. ( a ) Bedding components that are submitted for type approval must be tested for qualities of resistance to the ignition and propagation of flame of Annex 1, Part 9 of the FTP Code (incorporated by reference, see § 164.142-2).
( b ) All testing and inspections required by this subpart must be performed by an independent laboratory accepted by the Coast Guard under subpart 159.010 of this chapter. A list of independent laboratories accepted as meeting subpart 159.010 of this chapter is available online at *http://psix.uscg.mil/EQLabs/Default.aspx*.
( c ) The independent laboratory must perform an initial factory inspection to select the test specimens and establish the materials of construction, chemical make-up, dimensions, tolerances, and other related factors needed to confirm product consistency during follow-up production inspections.
( d ) Production inspections must be performed by the independent laboratory in accordance with subpart 159.007 of this chapter at least annually to confirm that no changes have been made to the product that may adversely affect its fire performance as a bedding component.
( e ) The independent laboratory must prepare production inspection procedures and a report of the results of the fire testing program, and must furnish the manufacturer with three copies of each upon completion of the required testing.
( f ) Materials approved under this subpart must be shipped in packaging that is clearly marked with the name of the manufacturer, product designation, date of manufacture, batch or lot number, and Coast Guard type approval number.
SUNSHINE ACT NOTICES
 

AGENCY: FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M
 

DATE & TIME: TUESDAY, JUNE 15, 2010, AT 10:00 A.M. 

PLACE: 999 E STREET, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 

STATUS: THIS MEETING WILL BE CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC. 

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. § 437g. 

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. § 437g, § 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C. 

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration. 

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee. 

****** 

DATE & TIME: WEDNESDAY, JUNE 16,2010, AT 11 :00 A.M.
 

PLACE: 999 E STREET, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. (NINTH FLOOR)
 

STATUS: THIS HEARING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.
 

AUDIT HEARING: GEORGIA FEDERAL ELECTIONS COMMITTEE. 

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language 

interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Darlene Harris, 

Deputy Commission Secretary, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the 

hearing date. 

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:	 Judith Ingram, Press Officer 

Telephone: (202) 694-1220 

Signed: 

Darlene 

£I~~ Harris 

Deputy Secretary of the Commission 

Received at the FEDERAL REGISTER: June 8,2010
----

----

----

----

SusanA. Cochran

U.S. Department of the Interior,U.S.Geological Survey,Western RegionCoastal and Marine Geology
# C_2013038EN.01001901.xml

| 9.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2012 — pelicantravel.com v OHIM — Pelikan (pelican)

(Case T-136/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community figurative mark pelikan - Absolute ground for refusal - No bad faith on the part of the applicant - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 38/31

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: pelicantravel.com s.r.o. (Bratislava, Slovakia) (represented by: M. Chlipala, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Pelikan Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (Hanover, Germany) (represented by: A. Nordemann, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 December 2010 (Case R 1428/2009-2) relating to invalidity proceedings between pelicantravel.com s.r.o. and Pelikan Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders pelicantravel.com s.r.o. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders pelicantravel.com s.r.o. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 139, 7.5.2011.

1

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 14, 2018

a1211 

# Order

Clerk December 14, 2018

156463

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 156463

COA: 338921

Wayne CC: 15

- 003518

- FC

JOSHUA MAURICE ROBINSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 28, 2017 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT appellate counsel, Tracie Gittleman,

to file a supplemental brief addressing the reason for her failure to file an applicati on for

leave to appeal in the Court of Appeals on the defendant’s behalf within the deadlines set

forth in MCR 7.205(G)(3), which led to the defendant losing his right to direct first

- tier

review of his plea

- based conviction. Counsel shall file the supple mental brief within 28

days of the date of this order.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.
N. Y. COMMON PLEAS.

#### Francis W. Holbrook, appellant, agt. Matthew T. Brennan, Sheriff, respondent.

*At a special term, of the court of common pleas of the city and county of New York, held at the County Court-house, New York city, December*31, 1874.

*Exception to swreties in undertaking.*

On appeal from the general term of the marine court to this court, the undertaking required should be according to sections 854 and 356 of the Code.

*Present*— *Hon.*Chas. P. Daly, *Chief Judge.*

A motion herein founded on affidavit of Charles H. Smith, Jr., and order to show cause why an order should not be made adjudging irregular and void the respondent’s notice of exception to the surety, and form of undertaking given pursuant to sections 354 and 356 of the Code, by the appellant herein on appeal to this court from the judgment rendered at the general term of the marine court of the city of New York, upon the grounds that the same is contrary to the practice of this court and is not sustained by the provisions of the Code, and to stay all proceedings upon and pursuant to such notice.

After hearing *Charles H. Smith, Jr.,*for appellant, in support of the motion, who cited Code, sections 354 and 356, McAdam’s Pr., 277, and *H. W. Bookstaver,*for respondent, in opposition, who cited Laws of'1872, chapter 629, and Laws of 1874, chapter 545, it is ordered that the motion be granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          41,746
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,746
<PP&E>                                         453,716
<DEPRECIATION>                                 369,043
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,874,686
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       162,575
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,892,813)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   126,419
<SALES>                                        324,329
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               324,329
<CGS>                                          192,343
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  945,974
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (662,645)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (662,645)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (662,645)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 162
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 162.039-7 Procedure for listing and labeling. ( a ) Manufacturers having models of extinguishers they believe are suitable for marine service may make application for listing and labeling of such product as a “marine type” semi-portable fire extinguisher by addressing a request directly to a recognized laboratory. The laboratory will inform the submitter as to the requirements for inspections, examinations, and testing necessary for such listing and labeling. All costs in connection with the examinations, tests, and inspections, listings and labelings are payable by the manufacturer.
( b ) [Reserved]
[CGFR 65-9, 30 FR 11487, Sept. 8, 1965, as amended by USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48279, July 22, 2016]
# C_2012379EN.01003401.xml

| 8.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/34

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 13 September 2012 — Markland v Europol

(Case F-34/11) (1)

1

(Civil Service - Europol staff - Temporary staff contract - Application of the CEOS - Grading - Action manifestly unfounded)

2012/C 379/55

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Saskia Jane Markland (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented by: N.D. Dane, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol) (represented by: D. Neumann, D. El Khoury and J. Arnould, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision to place the applicant in grade AST 5.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.

| 2. | Ms Markland shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the European Police Office. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Markland shall bear her own costs and pay those incurred by the European Police Office.

---

(1)  OJ C 204, 9.7.11, p. 30.

1

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CYNTHIA GREEN,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 14-14280 

v.

HONORABLE DENISE PAGE HOOD

NATIONWIDE ARBITRATION

SERVICES, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO OPEN DISCOVERY

On April 23, 2015, Plaintiff Cynthia Green filed a Motion to Open Discovery

Pursuant to Rule 26(d)(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure prior to the parties holding

a Rule 26(f) conference. The Court denies the motion since Plaintiff requested and

received Clerk’s Entries of Default as to all four Defendants in this action: 

Nationwide Arbitration Services, LLC, Cooper Financial, LLC, Mark Gray and

Matthew Marcucci. (Doc. Nos. 11, 12, 13, 14, 15) Once a default has been entered

by the Clerk under Rule 55(a), all of a Plaintiff’s well-pleaded allegations are deemed

admitted. American Auto. Ass’n v. Dickerson, 995 F. Supp. 2d 753, 756 (6th Cir.

2015). Since all well-pleaded allegations in Plaintiff’s Complaint are deemed

2:14-cv-14280-DPH-DRG Doc # 17 Filed 05/22/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 61
admitted, there is nothing to discover at this juncture of the proceedings and Rule

26(d)(1) is not applicable.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Open Discovery Pursuant to Rule

26(d)(1) (Doc. No. 16) is DENIED. 

S/Denise Page Hood 

Denise Page Hood

United States District Judge

Dated: May 22, 2015

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of

record on May 22, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/LaShawn R. Saulsberry 

Case Manager

2

2:14-cv-14280-DPH-DRG Doc # 17 Filed 05/22/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 62