alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2****Section 1350 Certification**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Nextera Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:     (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date:November 14, 2006       By: /s/ Michael P. Muldowney     Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer    (Principal Financial Officer)  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2010 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to allow States to regulate tow 

truck operations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2009 

Mr. MORAN of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to allow States 

to regulate tow truck operations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State and Local Preda5 tory Towing Enforcement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REGULATION OF TOW TRUCK OPERATORS. 

7 Section 14501(c)(2)(C) of title 49, United States 

8 Code, is amended by striking ‘‘the price of’’ and all that 


SMARTINEZ on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2010 IH

1 follows through ‘‘transportation is’’ and inserting ‘‘the 

2 regulation of tow truck operations’’. 

Æ 


SMARTINEZ on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Case 2:14-cv-14028-MFL-PJK ECF No. 1, PageID.1 Filed 10/20/14 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:14-cv-14028-MFL-PJK ECF No. 1, PageID.2 Filed 10/20/14 Page 2 of 11
Case 2:14-cv-14028-MFL-PJK ECF No. 1, PageID.3 Filed 10/20/14 Page 3 of 11
Case 2:14-cv-14028-MFL-PJK ECF No. 1, PageID.4 Filed 10/20/14 Page 4 of 11
Case 2:14-cv-14028-MFL-PJK ECF No. 1, PageID.5 Filed 10/20/14 Page 5 of 11
Case 2:14-cv-14028-MFL-PJK ECF No. 1, PageID.6 Filed 10/20/14 Page 6 of 11
Case 2:14-cv-14028-MFL-PJK ECF No. 1, PageID.7 Filed 10/20/14 Page 7 of 11
Case 2:14-cv-14028-MFL-PJK ECF No. 1, PageID.8 Filed 10/20/14 Page 8 of 11
Case 2:14-cv-14028-MFL-PJK ECF No. 1, PageID.9 Filed 10/20/14 Page 9 of 11
Case 2:14-cv-14028-MFL-PJK ECF No. 1, PageID.10 Filed 10/20/14 Page 10 of 11
Case 2:14-cv-14028-MFL-PJK ECF No. 1, PageID.11 Filed 10/20/14 Page 11 of 11
#### Eliza Bloom, *Respondent, v.*David S. Paige, *as Executor, etc., Appellant*.

Order modified by striking out the additional allowance and the costs of opposing the motion, and as modified affirmed, without costs.
A-9 Model Consent Form for Overdraft Services
 

EXPLANATION OF OVERDRAFT COVERAGE 

Your Right to Request Overdraft Coverage 

We will not pay your overdrafts for ATM withdrawals and debit card purchases you make at a 

store, online, or by telephone, unless you tell us you want overdraft coverage for these transactions. 

Even if you do not request overdraft coverage for ATM withdrawals and debit card purchases, we 

may still pay your overdrafts for other types of transactions, including checks. 

Having overdraft coverage does not guarantee that we will pay your overdrafts. If we decide to pay an 

overdraft, you will be charged fees as described below. 

Overdraft coverage differs from other overdraft services we offer, such as linking your account to another 

account with us or an overdraft line of credit. See below for more information, including how to contact 

us if you want overdraft coverage to apply to your ATM withdrawals and debit card purchases. 

Overdraft Fees 

 We will charge you a fee of [up to] [$__] each time we pay an overdraft. 

 We will also charge you a fee of [$__] for each day your account remains overdrawn. 

 [There is no limit on the daily fees we can charge you for overdrawing your account.] 

Other Ways We Can Cover Your Overdrafts 

We offer other ways of covering your overdrafts that may be less expensive, such as linking your account 

to another account with us or an overdraft line of credit. Contact us to learn more about these options. 

How to Request Overdraft Coverage or Get More Information 

To request overdraft coverage for your ATM withdrawals and debit card purchases, or for information 

about other alternatives we offer for covering overdrafts, please: 

 Contact us at 1-8xx-xxx-xxxx. 

 Contact us at [insert Internet address]. 

 Complete the form below and mail it to [insert address]. 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

___ I want overdraft coverage for my ATM withdrawals and debit card purchases. 

Printed Name: _________________________
 

Date: _________________________
 

Account Number: _________________________
5/1/2002

responses is adequate. If there were no comments made during the notice 

period or at the hearing, please indicate N/A to the left.
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

(Electronic Format)

TECHNICAL MATERIALS

Note: All documents and forms should be in electronic format.

Not

Attached Attached N/A

RULE EVALUATION FORM: See instructions for completing the Rule 

Evaluation Form and the accompanying sample form.

NON-EPA TEST METHODS: Attach all test methods that are referenced in 

your rule that do not appear in 40 CFR 51, 60, 61, 63, or have not been 

previously submitted to EPA. EPA methods used in other media such as 

SW846 for solid waste are not automatically approved for air pollution 

applications. Submittal of test methods that are not EPA-approved should 

include the information and follow the procedure described in Region 9’s “Test 

Method Review & Evaluation Process.”

MODELING SUPPORT: Provide if appropriate. In general, modeling support is 

not required for VOC and NOx rules to determine their impacts on ozone 

levels. Modeling is required where a rule is a relaxation that affects large 

sources (> 100 TPY) in an attainment area for SO2, directly emitted PM10, 

CO, or NOx (for NO2 purposes). In cases where EPA is concerned with the 

impact on air quality of rule revisions which relax limits or cause a shift in 

emission patterns in a nonattainment area, a reference back to the approved 

SIP will be sufficient provided the approved SIP accounts for the relaxation 

and provided the approved SIP used the current EPA modeling guidelines. If 

current EPA modeling guidelines were not used, then new modeling may be 

required.

ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATIONS FROM 

EPA POLICIES: The District staff report or other information included with the 

submittal should discuss all potential relaxations or deviations from RACT, 

RACM, BACT, BACM, enforceability, attainment, RFP, or other relevant EPA 

requirements. This includes, for example, demonstrating that exemptions or 

emission limits less stringent than the presumptive RACT (e.g., a CTG) meet 

EPA’s 5 percent policy, and demonstrating that all source categories 

exempted from a RACM/BACM rule are de minimus according to EPA’s 

RACM/BACM policy.

ADDITIONAL MATERIALS: Provide District staff reports and any other 

supporting information concerning development of the rule or rule changes. 

This information should explain the basis for all limits and thresholds 

contained in the rule.
#### Scott v. Stevenson.

Evidence— *declarations of assumed agent not admissible to bind principal.*

In an action upon a promissory note the defenses were that plaintiff was not a *bona fide*holder, and payment to the payee while he was the owner. Plaintiff gave evidence that she received the note from H., who represented to her that he was sent with it from the payee. There was no evidence of the authority of H. to transfer the note to plaintiff. *Held,*that declarations made by H. to plaintiff, at the time he gave her the note, were not admissible. *Marvin*v. *Wilber,*52 N. Y. 270.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the verdict of a jury.

The action was brought by Lovella Scott against Daniel Stevenson upon a promissory note.

*Charles Hughes,*for appellant.

*E. F. Bullard,*for respondent.

*706Countryman, J.

The only question passed upon in the opinion is fully set forth in the head-note.

*Judgment reversed and new tried granted.*
# C_2012287EN.01004001.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/40

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 10 July 2012 — AV v Commission

(Case F-4/11) (1)

1

(Civil service - Temporary agent - Recruitment - Medical cover deferment - Retroactive application of medical cover deferment - Opinion of invalidity committee)

2012/C 287/72

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: AV (Cadrezzate, Italy) (represented by: A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of decisions to defer medical cover in respect of the applicant as provided for by Article 32 of the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Union and not to grant him entitlement to the invalidity allowance.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | annuls the decision of 12 April 2010 whereby the European Commission deferred medical cover in respect of AV as provided for by Article 32 of the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annuls the decision of 12 April 2010 whereby the European Commission deferred medical cover in respect of AV as provided for by Article 32 of the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Union;

| 2. | annuls the decision of the European Commission of 16 April 2010 in so far as it denied AV entitlement to the invalidity allowance; |
| --- | --- |

2.

annuls the decision of the European Commission of 16 April 2010 in so far as it denied AV entitlement to the invalidity allowance;

| 3. | orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by AV. |
| --- | --- |

3.

orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by AV.

---

(1)  OJ C 179 18.6.2011, p. 21.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         224,054
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,147,634
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    908,974
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,070,242
<PP&E>                                       1,667,064
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,060
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,145,163
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          157,251
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,432
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,856,018
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,145,163
<SALES>                                        108,496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,496
<CGS>                                           71,448
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,448
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                87,166
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (50,118)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (50,918)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (50,918)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.026)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.026)


</TABLE>
# C_2009317EN.01013201.xml

| 23.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/132 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/132

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Amended proposal for a Council Directive on pure-bred breeding animals of the bovine species’

COM(2009) 235 final — 2006/0250 (CNS)

(2009/C 317/25)

On 26 June 2009 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Articles 37 and 94 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the

Amended proposal for a Council Directive on pure-bred breeding animals of the bovine species (Codified Version)

Amended proposal for a Council Directive on pure-bred breeding animals of the bovine species (Codified Version)

COM(2009) 235 final — 2006/0250 (CNS).

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion, adopted on 15 February 2007 (1), it decided, at its 455th plenary session, held on 15-16 July 2009 (meeting of 15 July 2009), by 185 votes in favour, one vote against and four abstentions to issue an opinion endorsing the proposal and to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.

1

th

Brussels, 15 July 2009.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Mario SEPI

---

(1)  Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Proposal for a Council Directive on pure-bred breeding animals of the bovine species (codified version) - OJ C 97 on 28.4.2007, p. 13.

1

Proposal for a Council Directive on pure-bred breeding animals of the bovine species (codified version)

---
EX-4.2





 Exhibit 4.2 
  





 












 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
  

									
	    TEN COM	  	-	  	as tenants in common	  		  	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT -                             
Custodian                            
	    TEN ENT	  	-	  	as tenants by the entireties	  		  	                                      
              (Cust)                          
       (Minor)
	    JT TEN	  	-	  	as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common 	  		  	
                          
                          under Uniform Gifts to Minors

 

                          
                                      Act  
                            

                          
                                         
       (State)


 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 

For Value Received,
                                         
            hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 
  

	
	   PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER  

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE

	    

  

	
	  
 (PLEASE
PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)

	
	  

	
	  

	
	                                     
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                    Shares
	of the stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
	                                     
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                Attorney
	to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.

  

	
	
Dated                 
                                         
 


  

			
		  	  
 NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE(S) TO
THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.


  

			
	Signature(s) Guaranteed
		
	By                                    
                                         
                                	 	
	The Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an eligible guarantor institution (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions with membership in an approved Signature Guarantee Medallion Program), pursuant to SEC
Rule 17Ad-15.	 	


  
  

COLUMBIA PRINTING SERVICES, LLC - www.stockinformation.com
Continued Airworthiness Notification to the International Community

To: Civil Aviation Authorities Date: March 25, 2016

From: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

New England Region, ANE-100

Engine & Propeller Directorate

1200 District Avenue

Burlington, MA 01803

Subject: This message is to advise you of the FAA’s ongoing activities related to the fracture of 

the high-pressure turbine (HPT) stage 2 hub affecting International Aero Engines AG (IAE) 

V2522-A5, V2524-A5, V2525-D5, V2527M-A5, V2527-A5, V2527E-A5, V2528-D5, V2530-

A5, and V2533-A5 turbofan engines.

Accident/ Incident Description: We received a report of the fracture of the HPT stage 2 hub 

during flight, which resulted in an in-flight shutdown, an undercowl fire, and smoke in the cabin. 

The incident involved an Airbus A320-232 airplane on a revenue flight. The National 

Transportation Safety Board issued Factual Report NTSB No. ENG14IA028 on October 14, 

2015, which indicated improper machining in the manufacture of the HPT stage 2 hub. 

Subsequent investigation of the HPT stage 1 hub found similar manufacturing defects.

Aircraft/ Engine Make, Model and Series: Airbus A319, A320, A321 and McDonnell 

Douglas MD-90 airplanes powered by (IAE) V2522-A5, V2524-A5, V2525-D5, V2527M-A5, 

V2527-A5, V2527E-A5, V2528-D5, V2530-A5, and V2533-A5 turbofan engines.

U.S.-registered fleet: 668 turbofan engines. Worldwide fleet: About 3,000 turbofan engines.

Operators: Air New Zealand, American Airlines, Asiana, All Nippon Airways, British 

Airways, China Eastern, China Southern, Delta Air Lines, Germanwings, JetBlue Airways, 

Lufthansa, Philippine Airlines, Spirit Airlines, United Airlines, and numerous others.

Ongoing activities: The FAA is issuing an airworthiness directive (AD) to mandate the 

inspection and replacement of suspect HPT stage 1 and stage 2 hubs.

Next update, if any: None.

Directorate Contact:

Brian Kierstead, Aerospace Engineer,

Engine Certification Office, Engine & Propeller Directorate

email: brian.kierstead@faa.gov

phone: 781-238-7772

fax: 781-238-7199
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WILLIAM SNELL,

Plaintiff, Case No. 14-13661

v. District Judge Denise Page Hood

Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

 

ORDER

On March 18, 2015, Plaintiff filed a request for an extension of time to file a

motion for summary judgment, originally due on January 15, 2015 [Docket #11]. On the

same day, he filed the motion for summary judgment [Docket #10]. 

Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time [Docket #11] is hereby GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/R. Steven Whalen 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dated: March 25, 2015

2:14-cv-13661-DPH-RSW Doc # 13 Filed 03/25/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 304
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on

March 25, 2015, electronically and/or by U.S. mail.

s/Carolyn M. Ciesla

Case Manager 

2:14-cv-13661-DPH-RSW Doc # 13 Filed 03/25/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 305
21st Century
Holding Company





EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT





In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of 21st Century
Holding Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Peter J. Prygelski, III,
Chief Financial Officer of 21st Century
Holding Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
                    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
                    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      21st
      Century Holding
Company.





By:  /s/ Peter J. Prygelski,
      IIIPeter
      J. Prygelski, III, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
      Officer)
                November
      15, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 67 (Monday, April 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 17568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1737]



[[Page 17568]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel, Review of K05 Applications.
    Date: May 7, 2007.
    Time: 1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Beata Buzas, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 
National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm 3041, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 301-443-0800, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ef8d8d9a958e9caf828e8683c1818687c1888099"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cdafafb8b7acbe8da0aca4a1e3a3a4a5e3aaa2bb">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 2, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1737 Filed 4-6-07; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>