alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 153

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 153.370 Minimum relief valve setting for ambient temperature cargo tanks.

The relief valve setting for a containment system that carries a cargo at ambient temperature must at least equal the cargo's vapor pressure at 46 °C (approx. 115 °F).

[CGD 81-078, 50 FR 21173, May 22, 1985]
§ 130.470 Fire alarms. ( a ) Each fire detector and control unit must be of a type specifically approved by the Commandant (CG-ENG).
( b ) No fire-alarm circuit for the engine room may contain a fire detector for any other space.
( c ) The number and placement of fire detectors must be approved by the cognizant OCMI.
[CGD 82-004 and CGD 86-074, 62 FR 49337, Sept. 19, 1997, as amended by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59782, Oct. 1, 2012]
EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------

The  undersigned,  a member of the Board of  Directors  and/or as  Officer of CE
CASECNAN  WATER AND  ENERGY  COMPANY,  INC.,  a  corporation  registered  in the
Republic of the Philippines  (the  "Company"),  hereby  constitutes and appoints
Douglas L.  Anderson  and Paul J.  Leighton and each of them as his/her true and
lawful   attorney-in-fact  and  agent,  with  full  power  of  substitution  and
resubstitution,  for and in his/her stead, in any and all capacities, to sign on
his/her  behalf the Company's  Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended
December  31, 2003 and to execute any  amendments  thereto and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto, and all other documents in connection therewith, with
the United  States  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  and  applicable  stock
exchanges,  with the full power and  authority  to do and perform each and every
act and thing  necessary or advisable to all intents and purposes as he might or
could  do  in  person,   hereby   ratifying   and   confirming   all  that  said
attorney-in-fact and agent or his/her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do
or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


Dated as of February 9, 2004.

/s/ David L. Sokol
-------------------
David L. Sokol



/s/ Patrick J. Goodman              /s/ David A. Baldwin
--------------------------          --------------------
Patrick J. Goodman                  David A. Baldwin



--------------------------          --------------------
Marivic Punzalan Espiritu           Jose Jaime Cruz



/s/ Linda B. Castillo
--------------------------          --------------------
Linda B. Castillo                   Jose R. Sandejas



--------------------------
Scott LaPrairie
###### Editorial Note on Part 148

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59783, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 148.400 Applicability.

Unless stated otherwise, the requirements of this subpart apply only to the shipment or loading of materials, listed in Table 148.10 of this part, for which Table 148.10 contains a reference to a section or paragraph of this subpart.
#### § 702.11 Special executive session.

If, during the course of a public session, evidence is submitted that was not previously presented at executive session and that the Commission determines may defame, degrade, or incriminate any person, the provisions of § 702.6 shall apply and such extensions, recesses or continuances of the public session shall be ordered by the Commission, as it deems necessary. The time and notice requirements of § 702.6 may be modified by the Commission provided reasonable notice of a scheduled executive session is afforded such person; the Commission may, in its discretion, strike such evidence from the record, in which case the provisions of § 702.6 shall not apply.
§ 115.625 Eligibility requirements for the Alternative Hull Examination (AHE) Program for certain passenger vessels. ( a ) Your vessel may be eligible for the AHE Program if— ( 1 ) It is constructed of steel or aluminum;
( 2 ) It has an effective hull protection system;
( 3 ) It has operated exclusively in fresh water since its last drydock examination;
( 4 ) It operates in rivers or protected lakes; and
( 5 ) It operates exclusively in shallow water or within 0.5 nautical miles from shore.
( b ) In addition to the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section, the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI) will evaluate the following information when determining your vessel's eligibility for the AHE Program: ( 1 ) The overall condition of the vessel, based on its inspection history;
( 2 ) The vessel's history of hull casualties and hull-related deficiencies; and
( 3 ) The AHE Program application, as described in § 115.630 of this part.
( c ) When reviewing a vessel's eligibility for the AHE program, the OCMI may modify the standards given by paragraph (a)(5) of this section where it is considered safe and reasonable to do so. In making this determination, the OCMI will consider the vessel's overall condition, its history of safe operation, and any other factors that serve to mitigate overall safety risks.
[USCG-2000-6858, 67 FR 21080, Apr. 29, 2002]
# C_2008265EN.01000201.xml

| 18.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 265/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 265/2

---

Communication from the Commission on the final percentage take-up for 2008 of rice import quotas provided for by Regulation (EC) No 1529/2007

(2008/C 265/02)

The final percentage take-up of each quota provided for in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1529/2007 of 21 December 2007 opening and providing for the administration in 2008 and 2009 of import quotas for rice originating in the African, Caribbean and Pacific States (ACP States) forming part of the Cariforum region and the overseas countries and territories (OCT) (1) for 2008 is established as follows:

1

| Origin/product | Order number | Final percentage take-up of the quota for 2008 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| States forming part of the Cariforum region (Article 1(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1529/2007)






  — | codes under CN 1006, except CN code 1006 10 10 |

Origin/product

Order number

Final percentage take-up of the quota for 2008

States forming part of the Cariforum region (Article 1(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1529/2007)

—

codes under CN 1006, except CN code 1006 10 10

09.4219

94,403 %

OCTs (Article 1(2)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 1529/2007)

| — | CN code 1006 |
| --- | --- |

—

CN code 1006

| (a) | Netherlands Antilles and Aruba |
| --- | --- |

(a)

Netherlands Antilles and Aruba

09.4189

18,957 %

| (b) | Least-developed OCTs |
| --- | --- |

(b)

Least-developed OCTs

09.4190

0 %

---

(1)  OJ L 348, 31.12.2007, p. 155.

1

---
June 15, 2015

Mr. Orly Bisquera

Microdesk Inc.

20 Pacifica Irvine, CA 92618

Dear Mr. Bisquera:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 4, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 2107), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59783, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 148.285 Metal sulfide concentrates. ( a ) When information given by the shipper under § 148.60 of this part indicates that the metal sulfide concentrate may generate toxic or flammable gases, the appropriate gas detection equipment from §§ 148.415 and 148.420 of this part must be on board the vessel.
( b ) No cargo hold containing a metal sulfide concentrate may be ventilated.
( c ) No person may enter a hold containing a metal sulfide concentrate unless— ( 1 ) The atmosphere in the cargo hold has been tested and contains sufficient oxygen to support life and, where the shipper indicates that toxic gas(es) may be generated, the atmosphere in the cargo hold has been tested for the toxic gas(es) and the concentration of the gas(es) is found to be less than the TLV; or
( 2 ) An emergency situation exists and the person entering the cargo hold is wearing the appropriate self-contained breathing apparatus.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

HOMER W. McCLARTY, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

C.R. BARD, INC., et al., 

Defendants. 

4:14-CV-13627-TGB-RSW 

HON. TERRENCE G. BERG 

ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY 

CLOSING CASE 

The Court having been advised that the parties have reached a 

settlement in principle in this and many other related cases throughout 

the country; 

And the parties having therefore requested a stay of discovery, 

deadlines, hearings, and all other proceedings for a period of 90 days to 

finalize settlement details and complete operative documents in this and 

other cases; 

And finding that the needs of judicial efficiency and effective case 

management would best be served by closing this case rather than having 

it remain dormant on the Court’s docket for an additional 90 days; 

Case 4:14-cv-13627-TGB-RSW ECF No. 39, PageID.3962 Filed 01/31/22 Page 1 of 2
2 

It is hereby ORDERED that this case shall be DISMISSED and 

ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED.

1 The parties may submit a 

stipulated judgment to be entered within the next 90 days. It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to 

enforce the terms of the settlement and to consider any post-judgment 

requests for fees or costs, should they be necessary. 

SO ORDERED this 31st day of January, 2022. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/Terrence G. Berg 

TERRENCE G. BERG 

United States District Judge 

1 The parties indicate that there is a “minimal” probability that this case 

may be subject to an opt-out of the final settlement. Notice of Settlement, 

ECF No. 38, PageID.3959. If this case does become subject to such an opt 

out, or if the settlement is otherwise not finalized, the parties may move 

the Court to reopen the case. 

Case 4:14-cv-13627-TGB-RSW ECF No. 39, PageID.3963 Filed 01/31/22 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Current Report of Mobile Reach International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 8K/A as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Joyce, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                            /s/  Charles Joyce
                                            ---------------------------------
                                                 Charles Joyce
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 June 14, 2005
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-7024

JAMES E. ROSE, JR.,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

RANDY DEMORY,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. 

Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (4:22-cv-01774-HMH)

Submitted: January 17, 2023 Decided: January 20, 2023

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James E. Rose, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7024 Doc: 10 Filed: 01/20/2023 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

James E. Rose, Jr., a state pretrial detainee, seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Rose’s 28 

U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and 

advised Rose that failure to file timely, specific objections to this recommendation could 

waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is 

necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the 

parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Martin v. Duffy, 858 

F.3d 239, 245 (4th Cir. 2017); Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 846-47 (4th Cir. 1985); see 

also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154-55 (1985). Although Rose received proper notice 

and filed timely objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation, he has waived 

appellate review because the objections were not specific to the particularized legal 

recommendations made by the magistrate judge. See Martin, 858 F.3d at 245 (holding 

that, “to preserve for appeal an issue in a magistrate judge’s report, a party must object to 

the finding or recommendation on that issue with sufficient specificity so as reasonably to 

alert the district court of the true ground for the objection” (internal quotation marks 

omitted)). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

deny Rose’s motion to consolidate. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7024 Doc: 10 Filed: 01/20/2023 Pg: 2 of 3
3

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7024 Doc: 10 Filed: 01/20/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theAnnual Report of MV Partners, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the periodended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Michael Vess, Co-PrincipalExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2. The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  April2, 2007
|        | By:    | /s/ J. Michael Vess            |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | J. Michael Vess                |
|   | Title: | Co-Principal Executive Officer |

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.1858 Cargo hose.

The person in charge of cargo transfer shall ensure that cargo hose used for cargo transfer service meets §§ 154.552 through 154.562.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.073-5 Certification. ( a ) The float-free link is not approved by the Coast Guard. The manufacturer of the link must certify that it meets all of the requirements of this subpart by application of the markings required in § 160.073-20.
( b ) If the manufacturer wants the link to be listed in the Coast Guard publication COMDTINST M16714.3 (Series), “Equipment Lists,” the manufacturer must send a letter requesting the listing to Commandant (CG-ENG), Attn: Office of Design and Engineering Systems, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509..
[CGD 79-167, 47 FR 41378, Sept. 20, 1982, as amended by CGD 88-070, 53 FR 34536, Sept. 7, 1988; CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50467, Sept. 29, 1995; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50733, Sept. 27, 1996; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49237, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60158, Sept. 30, 2013]
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2080 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the credit for 

nonbusiness energy property and to include biomass heating appliances 

in energy-efficient building property. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2009 

Mr. HODES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the credit for nonbusiness energy property and to include 

biomass heating appliances in energy-efficient building 

property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Renewable 

5 Biomass Heating Act’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2080 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION AND EXPANSION OF CREDIT FOR NON2 BUSINESS ENERGY PROPERTY. 

3 (a) EXTENSION OF CREDIT.—Paragraph (2) of sec4 tion 25C(g) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relat5 ing to termination) is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 

6 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2013’’. 

7 (b) EXPANSION OF ENERGY-EFFICIENT BUILDING

8 PROPERTY TO INCLUDE BOILERS AND FURNACES.—Sub9 paragraph (E) of section 25C(c)(3) of such Code (defining 

10 qualified energy efficiency improvements) is amended by 

11 striking ‘‘a stove’’ and inserting ‘‘biomass heating appli12 ance, including a stove, boiler and furnace,’’. 

13 (c) INCREASE IN LIMITATION AMOUNT.—Subsection 

14 (b) of section 25C of such Code (relating to limitation) 

15 is amended by striking ‘‘$1,500’’ and inserting ‘‘$6,000’’. 

16 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

18 December 31, 2009. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
§ 96.31 Audits. ( a ) *Basic rule.* Grantees and subgrantees are responsible for obtaining audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 (31 U.S.C. 7501-7507) and revised OMB Circular A-133, “Audits of State, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations.” The audits shall be made by an independent auditor in accordance with generally accepted Government auditing standards covering financial audits.
( b ) *Subgrantees.* State or local governments, as those terms are defined for purposes of the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996, that provide Federal awards to a subgrantee, expending $300,000 or more (or other amount as specified by OMB) in Federal awards in a fiscal year, shall: ( 1 ) Determine whether subgrantees have met the audit requirements of the Act. Commercial contractors (private for-profit and private and governmental organizations) providing goods and services to State and local governments are not required to have a single audit performed. State and local governments should use their own procedures to ensure that the contractor has complied with laws and regulations affecting the expenditure of Federal funds;
( 2 ) Determine whether the subgrantee spent Federal assistance funds provided in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. This may be accomplished by reviewing an audit of the subgrantee made in accordance with the Act or through other means (e.g., program reviews) if the subgrantee has not had such an audit;
( 3 ) Ensure that appropriate corrective action is taken within six months after receipt of the audit report in instances of noncompliance with Federal laws and regulations;
( 4 ) Consider whether subgrantee audits necessitate adjustment of the grantee's own records; and
( 5 ) Require each subgrantee to permit independent auditors to have access to the records and financial statements.
[62 FR 45963, Aug. 29, 1997]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from the Balance Sheet,
Statement of Operations, Statement of Cash Flows and notes thereto incorporated
in Part 1 of the 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                         208,344
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               544,615
<PP&E>                                         662,292
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,206,907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          801,685
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,756
<OTHER-SE>                                     364,466
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,206,907
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,411,110
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (6,411,110)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (6,411,110)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)



</TABLE>