alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011355EN.01000802.xml

| 3.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/8

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg (Germany) lodged on 6 September 2011 — L v M

(Case C-463/11)

2011/C 355/13

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: L

Applicant:

Defendant: M

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does a Member State exceed the limits of its discretion under Article 3(4) and (5) of Directive 2001/42 (1) if, in respect of a municipality’s development plans which determine the use of small areas at local level and set the framework for future development consent of projects but do not fall within the scope of Article 3(2) of Directive 2001/42, it determines — having regard to the relevant criteria of Annex II to the directive — by specifying a particular type of development plan which is characterised by a threshold based on surface area and by a qualitative condition, that when drawing up such a development plan the procedural provisions on environmental assessment otherwise applicable to development plans are to be waived and also provides that an infringement of those procedural provisions which stems from the fact that the municipality has incorrectly assessed the qualitative condition is irrelevant for the legal validity of a development plan of that particular type?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (OJ 2001 L 197, p. 30).

1

---
§ 141.235 Inspection, testing, and maintenance. ( a ) All lifesaving equipment must be tested and maintained in accordance with the minimum requirements of § 199.190 of this chapter, as applicable, and the vessel's TSMS, if the vessel has a TSMS.
( b ) Inspections and tests of lifesaving equipment must be recorded in the TVR, official logbook, or in accordance with any TSMS applicable to the vessel. The following minimum information is required: ( 1 ) The dates when inspections and tests were performed, the number or other identification of each unit inspected and tested, the results of the inspections and tests, and the name of the crewmember, surveyor or auditor and any others conducting the inspections and tests; and
( 2 ) Receipts and other records documenting these inspections and tests must be retained for at least 1 year after the expiration of the COI and made available upon request.
#### Rufus Burnham, *Appellant, v.*Samuel W. Phelps and others, *Respondents*.

Judgment reversed, new trial granted and costs to abide event. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
§ 112.50-1 General. ( a ) The prime mover of a generator set must have: ( 1 ) All accessories necessary for operation and protection of the prime mover; and
( 2 ) A self-contained cooling system of a size that ensures continuous operation with 100 degrees F (37 degrees C) air.
( b ) The fuel used must have a flashpoint of not less than 110 degrees F (43 degrees C).
( c ) The room that has the generator set must have intake and exhaust ducts to supply adequate cooling air.
( d ) The generator set must be capable of carrying its full rated load within 45 seconds after cranking is started with the intake air, room ambient temperature, and starting equipment at O°C. The generator's prime mover must not have a starting aid to meet this requirement, except that a thermostatically-controlled electric water-jacket heater connected to the final emergency bus is permitted.
( e ) The generator set must start by hydraulic, compressed air, or electrical means.
( f ) The generator set must maintain proper lubrication when inclined to the angles specified in § 112.05-5(c), and must be arranged so that it does not spill oil under a vessel roll of 30 degrees to each side of the vertical.
( g ) The following automatic shutdowns are required for the generator set: ( 1 ) Overspeed; and
( 2 ) Operation of a fixed fire extinguishing system in the emergency generator room.
( h ) The following audible alarms are required for the generator set if the prime mover is a diesel engine: ( 1 ) Low oil pressure; and
( 2 ) High cooling water temperature.
( i ) If the prime mover is a gas turbine, it must meet the shutdown and alarm requirements in § 58.10-15(f) of this chapter.
( j ) An independent fuel supply must be provided for the prime mover.
( k ) Each emergency generator that is arranged to be automatically started must be equipped with a starting device with an energy-storage capability of at least six consecutive starts. A second, separate source of starting energy may provide three of the required six starts. If a second source is provided, the system need only provide three consecutive starts.
[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15267, Apr. 8, 1982, as amended by CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28287, June 4, 1996; USCG-2004-18884, 69 FR 58348, Sept. 30, 2004; USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16369, Mar. 16, 2023]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with
this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report of Loral Space & Communications Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the
period ending December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Avi Katz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | /s/ Avi Katz                          
| | --------------------------------------
| | Avi Katz                              
| | President, General Counsel & Secretary



April 10, 2014
§ 141.325 Survival craft equipment. ( a ) Each item of survival craft equipment must be of good quality, effective for the purpose it is intended to serve, and secured to the craft.
( b ) Each towing vessel carrying a lifeboat must carry equipment in accordance with § 199.175 of this chapter.
( c ) Each life float and rigid buoyant apparatus must be fitted with a lifeline, pendants, a painter, and floating electric water light approved under approval series 161.010.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         3,892
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  43,720
<ALLOWANCES>                                   8,411
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               49,397
<PP&E>                                         75,674
<DEPRECIATION>                                 15,204
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 727,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          40,067
<BONDS>                                        401,949
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     192,771
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   727,189
<SALES>                                        140,098
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               140,098
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  119,567
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,326
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             28,127
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,922)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (759)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,163)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,163)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
§ 12.813 Alternative means of compliance. ( a ) The owner or managing operator of a U.S. flag large passenger vessel seeking to employ non-resident aliens issued MMCs under this subpart may submit a plan to the Coast Guard, which, if approved, will serve as an alternative means of complying with the requirements of this subpart.
( b ) The plan must address all the elements contained in this subpart, as well as the related elements contained in § 15.530 of this subchapter, to the satisfaction of the Coast Guard.
LAZARO ANGEL

- BELLO

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FI LED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 1296

Opinion filed April 5, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Miguel A. Rosada of the Phoenix Law Firm, P.L., Jacksonville , for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pa te, Bureau Chief,

Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

ROBERTS, C.J., SWANSON and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 3 - 0 36 2 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 3 -NM - 0 30 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
§ 109.439 Crane certificates. The master or person in charge shall insure that the following certificates and records for each crane are maintained on the unit: ( a ) Each certificate issued by a crane certifying authority.
( b ) Each record and original certificate, or certified copy of a certificate, or manufacturers or testing laboratories, companies or organizations for— ( 1 ) Loose gear;
( 2 ) Wire rope; and
( 3 ) The annealing of wrought iron gear.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MERLE J. STOKES
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 14

- 945

[ January 9, 201 9 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Dan L. Vaughn , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 561991CF000970A

.

Diamond R. Litty, Public Defender, and Usha Maharajh, Assistant Public Defender, Stuart, for appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J.

Carne y, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING/CLARIFICATION

P ER C URIAM

.

We lift the stay entered on February 3, 201 7 , and withdraw our opinion on motion for rehearing and clarification, dated February 22, 201 7

.

We affirm. See Franklin v. State, 43 Fla. L. Weekly S556 (Fla. Nov. 8,

2018 ) ; State v. Michel , 43 Fla. L. Weekly S298 (Fla. July 12, 2018)

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS
, M AY and L EVINE
, JJ., concur.

* * *
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2016 (the "Form 10-Q") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").



I, Heather D. Brolick, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Issuer, certify that to my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 14, 2016



| | /s/ Heather D. Brolick               
| | -------------------------------------
| | Heather D. Brolick                   
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2174 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 18 Main Street in Howland, Maine, as the 

‘‘Clyde Hichborn Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2174 EH

1 SECTION 1. CLYDE HICHBORN POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 18 Main Street in Howland, 

4 Maine, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Clyde 

5 Hichborn Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Clyde Hichborn Post 

10 Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 7, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2174 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostMaine, as the ‘‘Clyde Hichborn Post Office’’. al Service located at 18 Main Street in Howland,
#### Mary L. Watkins *v.*George W. Childs.

January Term, 1906.

Present: Tyler, Munson, Watson, Haselton, Powers, and Miles, JJ„

Opinion filed November 3, 1906.

*Equity*— Jurisdiction—Bill *to Determine Boundaries.*

It is not the business of equity to try titles to real estate.

Where neither irreparable mischief, a multiplicity of suits, nor oppressive litigation is threatened, a dispute between independent proprietors of adjoining lands as to the true division line is not sufficient ground for the interposition of a court" of equity either *235to ascertain and fix such boundary, or to determine the question of title involved.

Appeal in Chancery, Grand Isle County. Heard at Chambers, April 22, 1905, on demurrer to the bill. *Rowell,*Chancellor. Demurrer sustained, bill adjudged insufficient and dismissed with costs, and case referred to a master to determine the injunction damages. The orator appealed. The opinion states the case.

*H. S. Peck*for the orator.

*Lee S. Tillotson*for the defendant.

Where a bill is framed with the sole purpose of obtaining an injunction, and no other grounds of equitable relief are alleged, upon dissolution of the injunction the bill will be dismissed. *Am. Live Stock etc. Co.*v. *Chicago Live Stock Co.,*143 111. 210, 18 D. R. A. 190; High, Injunctions, §1706.

Powers, J.

The bill shows that a controversy has arisen between the oratrix and the defendant as to the true location of the line dividing their adjoining lands in Grand Isle. That the defendant has, without right or authority, built a fence on a part of the line as he claims it, and threatens to complete the same along the entire length of the same, thereby cutting off a strip of her land several feet in width. There are allegations regarding a suit at law, but they add nothing to the equities of the bill. The prayer is for an injunction and “for such other and general relief as to the court shall seem meet.” A temporary injunction was issued and dissolved, and the case comes before us on the demurrer incorporated into the defend* ant’s answer.

*236Passing over the question whether this is anything more than an injunction bill which should be dismissed upon the dissolution of the injunction prayed for, we take up the question whether equity has, under the allegations, jurisdiction to determine the controversy referred to.

In answering this question in the negative, it is sufficient to'say that the law court affords the oratrix a plain and adequate remedy. The existence of a dispute as to the boundary between independent proprietors of adjoining lands does not afford sufficient ground for the interposition of a court o£ equity to ascertain and fix such boundary. *Walker*v. *Leslie, 90*Ky. 642. Nor will equity interfere to determine the question of title involved. 1 Pom. Eq. §177. “It is not the business of equity to try titles, and put one party out and another in.” *Frost*v. *Walls,*93 Me. 405.

Neither irreparable mischief, a multiplicity of suits, nor oppressive litigation is threatened, for the dispute can be settled in a single action of trespass.

*Decree affirmed and cause remanded.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the 15th meeting of the American Health Information Community Electronic Health Records Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.).

# DATES:

April 18, 2007, from 9:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. (Eastern Daylight Time).

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090. Please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​healthrecords/​.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Workgroup will continue its discussion on ways to achieve widespread adoption of certified EHRs, minimizing gaps in adoption among providers.

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional information, go to:                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​healthrecords/​ehr_​instruct.html.*

Dated: March 22, 2007.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 07-1541 Filed 3-28-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 151.58-1 Required materials. When one of the following paragraphs of this section is referenced in table 151.05, only those materials listed in that paragraph may be used in components that contact the cargo or its vapor: ( a ) Aluminum, stainless steel, or steel covered with a protective lining or coating. (See § 151.15-3(f)(2).)
( b ) - ( c ) [Reserved]
( d ) Solid austenitic stainless steel.
( e ) Stainless steel or steel covered with a suitable protective lining or coating. (See § 151.15-3(f)(2).)
[CGD 88-100, 54 FR 40041, Sept. 29, 1989]
|EXHIBIT 32.2
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer ofBelcrestCapital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | theQuarterlyReport of the Fund on Form10-Qfor thequarterendedSeptember 30, 2007(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                    
|   



|Date:November 9, 2007
|---------------------



| | /s/Andrew C. FrenetteAndrew C. FrenetteChief Financial Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.