18118 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 

§ 270.17 are paid on a prorated basis to 

the sector participants from whom those 

moneys were collected under § 270.20. 

[FR Doc. E7–6751 Filed 4–10–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–S 

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 

18 CFR Part 1310 

Administrative Cost Recovery 

AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority 

(TVA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: TVA is amending its 

administrative cost recovery regulations 

by eliminating cost recovery exemptions 

for the following: Conveyances of land 

pursuant to Section 4(k)(d) of the 

Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933, 

as amended (16 U.S.C. 831c(k)(d)); TVA 

phosphate land transactions; and 

permits and licenses for use of TVA 

land by distributors of TVA power. 

The implementation of this rule 

amendment will allow TVA to recover 

more of its administrative costs incurred 

in processing certain actions from those 

who directly benefit from the actions. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 11, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nancy Greer, Senior Manager, Process 

and Performance Management, (865) 

632–3339. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In order to 

help ensure that TVA land management 

and permitting activities are selfsustaining to the full extent possible, the 

agency is amending its administrative 

cost recovery regulations by eliminating 

certain mandatory cost recovery 

exemptions. This determination is 

consistent with the objectives of 

increasing efficiency and recovering the 

cost of government services from those 

who most directly benefit from the 

services. 

TVA is amending its administrative 

cost recovery regulation by eliminating 

the following exemptions: Conveyances 

of land pursuant to Section 4(k)(d) of 

the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 

1933, as amended (16 U.S.C. 831c(k)(d)); 

TVA phosphate land transactions; and 

permits and licenses for use of TVA 

land by distributors of TVA power. 

TVA is also amending the rule to 

reflect new organizational changes 

within the agency. The terms ‘‘Vice 

President of Land Management’’ or 

‘‘Manager of Power Properties’’ are to be 

amended to read ‘‘Senior Manager of the 

TVA organization that manages the 

land.’’

TVA published a proposed rule on 

April 14, 2006. TVA considers this final 

rule to be a nonsubstantive rule relating 

to agency management and public 

property pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2). 

However, TVA provided a thirty day 

public comment period to hear from any 

interested parties. No comments were 

received. Since this rule relates to 

services provided by the agency, a 

regulatory flexibility analysis is not 

required. 

List of Subjects in 18 CFR Part 1310 

Government property, Hunting. 

For the reasons set out in the 

preamble, TVA amends 18 CFR part 

1310 as follows: 

PART 1310—ADMINISTRATIVE COST 

RECOVERY 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 1310 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 831–831dd; 31 U.S.C. 

9701. 

■ 2. Revise paragraphs (a) introductory 

text and (b) of § 1310.2 to read as 

follows: 

§ 1310.2 Application. 

(a) General. TVA will undertake the 

following actions only upon the 

condition that the applicant pay to TVA 

such administrative charges as the 

Senior Manager of the TVA organization 

that administers the land or permit 

being considered (hereinafter 

‘‘responsible land manager’’), as 

appropriate, shall assess in accordance 

with § 1310.3; provided, however, that 

the responsible land manager may 

waive payment where he/she 

determines that there is a corresponding 

benefit to TVA or that such waiver is 

otherwise in the public interest. 

* * * * * 

(b) Exemption. An administrative 

charge shall not be made for the 

following actions: 

(1) Releases of unneeded mineral right 

options. 

(2) TVA mineral transactions. 

* * * * * 

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 831–831dd (2000 & 

Supp. III 2003). 

Dated: March 2, 2007. 

Kathryn J. Jackson, 

Executive Vice President, River System 

Operations & Environment and 

Environmental Executive, Tennessee Valley 

Authority. 

[FR Doc. 07–1702 Filed 4–10–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8120–08–M 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Food and Drug Administration 

21 CFR Part 524 

Ophthalmic and Topical Dosage Form 

New Animal Drugs; Mupirocin 

Ointment 

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, 

HHS. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug 

Administration (FDA) is amending the 

animal drug regulations to reflect 

approval of an abbreviated new animal 

drug application (ANADA) filed by 

Altana, Inc. The ANADA provides for 

veterinary prescription use of mupirocin 

ointment for the treatment of bacterial 

skin infections in dogs. 

DATES: This rule is effective April 11, 

2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

K. Harshman, Center for Veterinary 

Medicine (HFV–104), Food and Drug 

Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., 

Rockville, MD 20855, 301–827–0169, email: john.harshman@fda.hhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Altana, 

Inc., 60 Baylis Rd., Melville, NY 11747, 

filed ANADA 200–418 that provides for 

veterinary prescription use of MURICIN 

(mupirocin) Ointment 2% for the 

treatment of bacterial skin infections in 

dogs. Altana, Inc.’s MURICIN Ointment 

2% is approved as a generic copy of 

Pfizer, Inc.’s BACTODERM Ointment 

approved under new animal drug 

application (NADA) 140–839. The 

ANADA is approved as of March 8, 

2007, and the regulations are amended 

in 21 CFR 524.1465 to reflect the 

approval. 

In accordance with the freedom of 

information provisions of 21 CFR part 

20 and 21 CFR 514.11(e)(2)(ii), a 

summary of safety and effectiveness 

data and information submitted to 

support approval of this application 

may be seen in the Division of Dockets 

Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug 

Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 

1061, Rockville, MD 20852, between 9 

a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through 

Friday. 

The agency has determined under 21 

CFR 25.33(a)(1) that this action is of a 

type that does not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. Therefore, 

neither an environmental assessment 

nor an environmental impact statement 

is required. 

This rule does not meet the definition 

of ‘‘rule’’ in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with RULES