alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute of Nursing Research Special Emphasis Panel, April 18, 2007, 8 a.m. to April 19, 2007, 9 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 30, 2007, FR 07-360.                

The meeting changed from March 14-15, 2007 to April 18-19, 2007. The meeting place changed from Crowne Plaza Hotel, Silver Spring to 6701 Democracy, Bethesda. The new time begins at 7:30 p.m. to 9 p.m.on 4/18/07 and 7:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. on 4/19/07. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: April 2, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-1733  Filed 4-6-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 129.540 Remote stopping-systems on OSVs of 100 or more gross tons. ( a ) Except as provided by paragraph (b) of this section, each vessel must be fitted with remote stopping-systems that comply with subpart 111.103 of this chapter.
( b ) The following remote stopping-systems may substitute for remote stopping-systems that must comply with subpart 111.103 of this chapter: ( 1 ) For each propulsion unit, in the pilothouse.
( 2 ) For each discharge pump for bilge slop or dirty oil, at the deck discharge.
( 3 ) For each powered ventilation system, outside the space ventilated.
( 4 ) For each fuel-oil pump, outside the space containing the pump.
( 5 ) For each cargo-transfer pump for combustible and flammable liquid, at each transfer-control station.
( c ) Remote stopping-systems required by this section may be combined.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

TRIKA JEANNE MELLON,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO: 14-CV-14374-DT

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant.

 /

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order Adopting the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denying

plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment entered this date,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be, and hereby is

GRANTED in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Dated: March 9, 2016 s/Lisa Wagner 

Lisa Wagner, Case Manage to 

Judge Robert H. Cleland 

 

2:14-cv-14374-RHC-SDD Doc # 17 Filed 03/09/16 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 1085
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
<LEGEND>   THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
           THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE AND IS QUALIFIED
           IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

<S>                           <C>
<CURRENCY>                     US DOLLARS
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                            323,081
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     135,713
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                       462,591
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  992,184
<PP&E>                            162,755
<DEPRECIATION>                     74,208
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,202,263
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             609,450
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                       435,798
<COMMON>                        5,562,853
<OTHER-SE>                     (5,405,838)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,202,263
<SALES>                           616,101
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  616,101
<CGS>                             465,762
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   3,114,011
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (2,474,732)
<INCOME-TAX>                   (2,474,732)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (2,474,732)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                   (2,474,732)
<EPS-BASIC>                         (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.11)


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.1705 Independent tank type C. The following cargoes must be carried in an independent tank type C that meets § 154.701(a): ( a ) Ethylene oxide.
( b ) Methyl bromide.
( c ) Sulfur dioxide.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential  trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute  of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel, Infertility Treatment, Child Growth and Development to Age Three Years.                    

*Date:*                         April 23, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         Double Tree Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Hameed Khan, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator,  Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of  Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6902,                         *khanh@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 20, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-1503  Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

The Federal Communications Commission will hold an Open Meeting on the subjects listed below on Wednesday, January 17, 2007, which is scheduled to commence at 9:30 a.m. in Room TW-C305, at 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC. The Meeting will focus on presentations by senior agency officials regarding implementations of the agency's strategic plan and a comprehensive review of FCC policies and procedures. 

Presentations will be made in four panels:

Panel One will feature the Managing Director and the Chief of the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau. 

Panel Two will feature the Chiefs of the Enforcement Bureau and Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau. 

Panel Three will feature the Chiefs of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, Office of Engineering and Technology, and the International Bureau. 

Panel Four will feature the Chiefs of the Media Bureau, and Wireline Competition Bureau. 

                    Additional information concerning this meeting may be obtained from Audrey Spivack or David Fiske, Office of Media Relations, (202) 418-0500; TTY 1-888-835-5322. Audio/Video coverage of the meeting will be broadcast live with open captioning over the Internet from the FCC's Audio/Video Events web page at                     *http://www.fcc.gov/​realaudio.*

                    For a fee this meeting can be viewed live over George Mason University's Capitol Connection. The Capitol Connection also will carry the meeting live via the Internet. To purchase these services call (703) 993-3100 or go to                     *http://www.capitolconnection.gmu.edu.*

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 07-163 Filed 1-12-07; 11:49 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### Miller *v.*Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Appellant.

*Appeals—Order of common pleas affirming judgment of*justice— *Quashing appeal.*

No appeal lies from the judgment of the court of common pleas affirming on certiorari the judgment of a justice of the peace.

Argued Oct. 9, 1914.

Appeal, No. 3, Feb. T., 1915, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Clinton Co., Oct. T., 1913, No. 8, affirming judgment of justice of the peace in case of Mary R. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.

Before Rice, P. J., Orlady, Head, Henderson, Kephart and Trexler, JJ.

Appeal quashed.

Motion to quash appeal.

*Henry Hippie,*with him *Candor & Munson,*for appellant.

*E. Clinton Rhoads,*with him *Morris Wolf,*deputy attorney general, and *John C. Bell,*attorney general, for insurance commissioner.

November 16, 1914:

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

This action of assumpsit was begun before a justice of the peace. The summons was served upon George A. Johnson, local agent of the defendant company, at Lock Haven, Pa., at the office and place of the company for receiving premiums. Upon the return day, as shown by the justice’s transcript, George A. Johnson appeared before the justice and requested a continuance for the defendant until a later day, which was granted. Upon this later date the defendant did not appear and after judgment had been entered in the plaintiff’s favor a certiorari was sued out. The common pleas affirmed the *465judgment of the justice and thereupon this appeal was taken. A motion to quash is presented which, amongst other things, is based on the ground that the judgment of the common pleas is final. The precise question in all of its essential features was raised and considered by this court in Huntingdon and Broad Top Mountain Railroad v. Fluke, 32 Pa. Superior Ct. 126. Following the principle of that decision and of other cases therein cited we are led to the conclusion that the motion must prevail. The case of Murdy v. McCutcheon et ux., 95 Pa. 435, which is urged upon our attention by the appellant’s counsel, was therein considered and we are not required to say anything further than we said there with regard to the controlling effect of that decision. Section 22 of the Act of March 20, 1810, 5 Sm. L. 161, provides that “the judgment of the court of common pleas shall be final on all proceedings removed as aforesaid (by certiorari), by the said court, and no writ of error shall issue thereon.” “This prohibition, that has been on the statute books for over 100 years and has been found to. work well, ought not to be refined away by subtle and ingenious construction that is, in effect, a repudiation of it. It has been upheld and enforced in a multitude of cases. We have no authority, and, if we had, we would have no disposition, to tone down the vigor of its expression:” Home Protective Association v. Reese, 47 Pa. Superior Ct. 452.

The appeal is quashed at the costs of the appellant.
###### Editorial Note on Part 153

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 153.355 PV venting systems.

When Table 1 requires a PV venting system, the cargo tank must have a PV valve in its vent line. The PV valve must be located between the tank and any connection to another tank's vent line (such as a vent riser common to two or more tanks).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 14-MC-50983

v. HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH

ERNEST GARNER,

Defendant,

and

STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Garnishee.

 /

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST

FOR HEARING ABOUT THE GARNISHMENT

AND CLAIM FOR EXEMPTIONS (DOC. #4)

Defendant pleaded guilty to one count of Theft of Mail in violation of 18 U.S.C. §

1708, and was sentenced to a period of imprisonment for six months and ordered to pay

$177,916.97 in restitution. See United States v. Ernest Garner, 13-CR-20493 (Doc. 11). 

On July 24, 2014, the government filed a writ of continuing garnishment with the Michigan

Department of Treasury Third Party Withholding Unit, requesting “whether or not you have

in your custody, control or possession, any property owned by the debtor [defendant],

including non-exempt, disposable earnings.” The government seeks to garnish any

income, tax refunds or other payments due to the defendant from the state of Michigan. 

The matter is before the court on defendant’s request for a hearing about the garnishment

and his claim for exemptions. Defendant does not state a reason why he requests a

-1-

2:14-mc-50983-GCS Doc # 6 Filed 09/17/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 30
hearing, but he checked all 11 form exemptions from garnishment under 18 U.S.C. § 3613

as grounds for challenging the garnishment (Doc. 4).

The government responds that defendant is not entitled to a hearing because (1) he

failed to state any reason to support his request; and (2) defendant’s blanket claim of every

exemption under 18 U.S.C. § 3613 is without merit.

The government’s position is well-taken. A judgment debtor who challenges a writ

of garnishment has the burden of establishing entitlement to an exemption. United States

v. Sawaf, 74 F.3d 119, 122 (6th Cir. 1996). A tax refund, based on taxes withheld as the

result of employment, are not exempt from garnishment. United States v. Henderson, No.

13-CV-15146, 2014 WL 4209936, at *1 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 26, 2014). The defendant has not

raised a valid exemption or alleged failure to comply with statutory requirements, and,

therefore, is not entitled to a hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 17, 2014

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

September 17, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and

also on Ernest Tommie Garner, 30245 Matthew,

Westland, MI 48186.

s/Barbara Radke

Deputy Clerk

-2-

2:14-mc-50983-GCS Doc # 6 Filed 09/17/14 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 31
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17984-17985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1807]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration


Sunshine Act Meetings; Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of 
Directors

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
    Time and Date: April 24, 2007, 12 noon to 3 p.m., Eastern Daylight 
Time.
    Place: This meeting will take place telephonically. Any interested 
person may call Mr. Avelino Gutierrez at (505) 827-4565 to receive the 
toll free number and pass code needed to participate in this meeting by 
telephone.
    Status: Open to the public.
    Matters To Be Considered: The Unified Carrier Registration Plan 
Board of Directors (the Board) will continue its work in developing and 
implementing the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement and to 
that end, may consider matters properly before the Board.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Avelino Gutierrez, Chair, Unified 
Carrier Registration Board of Directors at (505) 827-4565.


[[Page 17985]]


    Dated: April 6, 2007.
William Quade,
Acting, Associate Administrator, Enforcement and Program Delivery.
[FR Doc. 07-1807 Filed 4-6-07; 2:50 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
#### HENRY BURRUANO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. PUBLIC SERVICE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, APPELLANT.

Decided February 4, 1929.

Before Justices Tbenchakd, Kalisch and Lloyd.

Eor the appellant, *Henry H. Fryling.*

Eor the appellee, *James F. F. O’Brien.*

Pee Cueiam.

There was a judgment below for the plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum of $50.

The defendant-appellant, by its servant, was operating a passenger bus along Springfield avenue, which vehicle struck a stone with such force as to hurl it from the street across the sidewalk and through the plate glass window of the barber shop of the plaintiff-appellee, causing damage to the plaintiff’s property therein.

That there was testimony that the stone was about six inches in size; that it reposed about four feet from the curb, in the roadway; there had been digging in the vicinity where the stone lay, and that the bus at the time it hit the stone was being propelled at a speed between eighteen and twenty miles an hour.

*170The appellant, in the brief of its counsel, concedes that the stone was lying in the roadway and was struck by the bus with its front tire, and hurled through the shop window of the plaintiff.

The ground relied on for a reversal of the judgment is, that the trial judge, at the close of the entire case, refused to find in favor of the defendant-appellant. The question presented was one of mixed law and fact. The accident happened in the daytime. The stone was lying on the surface of the roadway. The driver testified that he did not see the stone. If he had been on the alert to observe obstructions in the street, there can be no good legal excuse offered why he did not see it. He was propelling his bus at a speed from eighteen to twenty miles an hour in a neighborhood where the houses are close together, and at a place near which an excavation had been going on.

We think that the trial judge was warranted in finding that the driver was not in the exercise of that degree of care which a prudent person was called upon to exercise under the circumstances. *Geise*v. *Mercer Bottling*Co., 87 *N. J. L. 224.*

The fact, that the stone was hurled with such force from the place where it was lying in the roadway, so as to go through a plate glass window, and wound up its career by doing injury to the plaintiff’s property in the shop, leads to the inference that the bus must have been propelled at a high rate of speed, in order to give such impulse to the stone. If the driver had used ordinary prudence he would have seen the stone, and thus have governed the speed of his bus accordingly.

Judgment is affirmed, with costs.
§ 87.2 Applicability. This part applies to grants awarded in HHS social service programs governed by either the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements at 45 CFR part 75 or Block Grant regulations at 45 CFR part 96, except as provided in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. ( a ) *Discretionary grants.* This part is not applicable to the discretionary grant programs that are governed by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Charitable Choice regulations found at 42 CFR part 54a. This part is also not applicable to discretionary grant programs that are governed by the Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Charitable Choice regulations at 45 CFR part 1050, with the exception of §§ 87.1 and 87.3(k) through (m) and (o), which do apply to such CSBG discretionary grants. Discretionary grants authorized by the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act are also not governed by this part.
( b ) *Formula and block grants.* This part does not apply to non-discretionary and block grant programs governed by the SAMHSA Charitable Choice regulations found at 42 CFR part 54, or the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Charitable Choice regulations at 45 CFR part 260. Block grants governed by the CSBG Charitable Choice regulations at 45 CFR part 1050 are not subject to this part, with the exception of §§ 87.1 and 87.3(k) through (m) and (o), which do apply to such CSBG block grants. This part is not applicable to Child Care and Development Block Grants governed by 45 CFR part 98.
[81 FR 19426, Apr. 4, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 15721, Mar. 4, 2024]