alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ANTHONY CRANE RENTAL, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,214
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,249
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,795)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,038
<PP&E>                                         484,078
<DEPRECIATION>                                 117,928
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 428,792
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,189
<BONDS>                                        393,512
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,985
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   428,792
<SALES>                                         48,902
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,902
<CGS>                                           31,516
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,516
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,616
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,830
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,060)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       101
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,161)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,161)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-3775

___________ David E. Collins, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa. * David Scurr, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: September 13, 2000 Filed: September 19, 2000

___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, LAY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In1995, David E. Collins pleaded guilty to state drug-related charges and later filed an application for state postconviction relief, which was denied on December 19, 1996. Collins did not appeal the denial of his application for state postconviction relief. OnSeptember 9, 1998, Collins filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. The district court dismissed Collins's § 2254 petition, concluding the petition was not timely filed within the applicable one-year statute of limitations for § 2254 petitions. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) (Supp. IV 1998).-2-

Onappeal, Collins concedes his § 2254 petition was filed outside the one-year limitationperiod of § 2244(d), but argues the statute of limitations should have been equitably tolled due to his alleged mental incompetence. We disagree. "In the habeas context, equitable tolling is proper when '"extraordinary circumstances" beyond a prisoner's control make it impossible to file a petition on time,'" Paige v. United States , 171 F.3d 559, 561 (8th Cir. 1999) (quoted case omitted), circumstances which Collins has not alleged in this case. Instead, as the district court noted, Collins's "only response to [his habeas action's] untimeliness is he was suffering from apparent mental incompetency at the time of his plea [in 1995], and he needs to develop further how lon g his mental incompetency continued and whether it affected his ability to file a habeas petition." (Dist. Ct. Op. at 2-3.) These bald and unsupported assertions, however, relate to an instance of alleged mental incompetency that "occurred at a time [] remote to his [§ 2254 petition filing] deadline, and absent a showing that [Collins] diligently pursued his application [after the denial of state postconviction relief in December

1996] and still could not complete it on time [due to mental incompetency]," Fisher v. Johnson , 174 F.3d 710, 716 (5th Cir. 1999), Collins has failed to make the requiredthreshold showing of mental incompetency necessary to equitably toll the statute of limitations and excuse the late filing of his § 2254 petition. See id. at 715-16; Calderon v. United States Dist. Court , 163 F.3d 530, 541 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc) (stat ute of limitations was equitably tolled because record disclosed defendant had been having serious mental problems for many years), cert. denied , 526 U.S. 1060 (1999).
We thus affirm

the dismissal of Collins's § 2254 petition. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 111.70-1 General. ( a ) Each motor circuit, controller, and protection must meet the requirements of sections 4-8-2/9.17, 4-8-4/9.5 and 4-8-3/5 of ABS Marine Vessel Rules; sections 6-1-7/9.9 and 6-1-7/9.15 of the ABS MOU Rules; or IEC 60092-301:1980 (all three standards incorporated by reference; see 46 CFR 110.10-1), as appropriate, except for the following circuits: ( 1 ) Each steering gear motor circuit and protection must meet part 58, subpart 58.25, of this chapter.
( 2 ) Each propulsion motor circuit and protection must meet subpart 111.35 of this part.
( b ) In ungrounded three-phase alternating current systems, only two motor-running protective devices (overload coil or heater type relay within the motor and controller) need be used in any two ungrounded conductors, except when a wye-delta or a delta-wye transformer is used.
( c ) The motor disconnecting means must be an externally operable switch or circuit breaker.
[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15236, Apr. 8, 1982, as amended by CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28281, June 4, 1996; 62 FR 23909, May 1, 1997; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65199, Oct. 31, 2008; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60153, Sept. 30, 2013; USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16364, Mar. 16, 2023]
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

R.L.S. Rental Company, 

Inc,. dlb/a Mizzou Aviation 

v. 

City of Joplin, Missouri 

Complainant, FAA Docket No. 16-13-06 

Respondent. 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above-referenced 

complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport 

Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 16, subpart B, the date by 

which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to April 1, 2016. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this 

case. 

r ir 

cting Director, Office of Ai port Compliance 

and Management Analysis 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on February 3. 2016, I caused to be placed in the United States mail (first 

class mail, postage paid) a true copy of the Notice of Extension of Time addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainant: 

Shelley A. Ewalt 

McBreen & Kopko 

500 North Broadway 

Jericho, NY 11753 

Respondent: 

Mr. Peter Edwards 

602 South Main Street 

Joplin, MO 64801 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket, AGC-6 J 0 

FAA Airport Compliance and Field Operations, AC0-1 00 

Claudia Roberts 

Office of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis
§ 129.200 Design, installation, and maintenance. Electrical equipment on a vessel must be designed, installed, and maintained to— ( a ) Provide services necessary for safety under normal and emergency conditions;
( b ) Protect crew members, offshore workers, and the vessel from electrical hazards, including fire, caused by or originating in electrical equipment and electrical shock;
( c ) Minimize accidental personal contact with energized parts; and
( d ) Prevent electrical ignition of flammable vapors.
EXHIBIT 31.01A

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Peter E. Kalan, certify that:

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of CSG Systems International, Inc.; |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date:  | July 9, 2014 |   | /s/ Peter E. Kalan                    |
|--------|--------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |         |   | Peter E. Kalan                        |
|   |         |   | Chief Executive Officer and President |
# Image Gallery Gateway

        - Biological and Environmental Research
        - BER Document Access
        - Image Gallery
        - Research Highlights

        - Gallery Home
        - Image Use & Credits 
        - Resolutions & Downloading

## Gallery:       Chromosome Images 

Displaying 1	- 48 of 48 images

Chromosome 1

Chromosome 1

Chromosome 10

Chromosome 10

Chromosome 11

Chromosome 11

Chromosome 12

Chromosome 12

Chromosome 13

Chromosome 13

Chromosome 14

Chromosome 14

Chromosome 15

Chromosome 15

Chromosome 16

Chromosome 16

Chromosome 17

Chromosome 17

Chromosome 18

Chromosome 18

Chromosome 19

Chromosome 19

Chromosome 2

Chromosome 2

Chromosome 20

Chromosome 20

Chromosome 21

Chromosome 21

Chromosome 22

Chromosome 22

Chromosome 3

Chromosome 3

Chromosome 4

Chromosome 4

Chromosome 5

Chromosome 5

Chromosome 6

Chromosome 6

Chromosome 7

Chromosome 7

Chromosome 8

Chromosome 8

Chromosome 9

Chromosome 9

Chromosome X

Chromosome X

Chromosome Y

Chromosome Y

**Image Use and Credits**       Almost all the images on these pages are original      graphics created by the U.S. Department of Energy       Genomic Science program's  Biological and Environmental Research           Information System (BERIS). You will recognize BERIS images by      their credit lines.      Permission to use these graphics is not needed, but please      credit the U.S. Department of Energy Genomic Science program and       the website http://genomicscience.energy.gov. All other images were provided by third parties and not created by the      U.S. Department of Energy. You must contact the persons listed      in the credit lines before using those images.

    Please contact us with questions or feedback.

Internal PPTs and Gallery (login required)

### Image Resolutions

**Web (on-screen)**	      Resolution of 72 ppi, suitable for electronic use  when there is no text or fine detail.

**"Full-Size" or Medium Resolution (where available)**Resolution of 150 ppi,  suitable for electronic use   when  image contains text or fine  detail.

**Press Quality ("Hi Res")**Resolution of 300 ppi,  for use in documents that will be printed.

## Search for Images In           All Galleries: 

Webmaster      *      Disclaimer

This image gallery is a special feature of the genomicscience.energy.gov website administered by the Biological and Environmental Research           Information System (BERIS) for the       Office of      Biological and Environmental Research of the      U.S. Department of      Energy Office of Science.    

*Base url: http://genomicscience.energy.gov*
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2174 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2174

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 8, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 18 Main Street in Howland, Maine, as the ``Clyde Hichborn Post 
                               Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLYDE HICHBORN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 18 Main Street in Howland, Maine, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Clyde Hichborn Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Clyde 
Hichborn Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 7, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Minerals Management Service

# AGENCY:

Minerals Management Service, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of the proposed Notice of Sale for proposed Sale 204.

# SUMMARY:

The MMS announces the availability of the proposed Notice of Sale for proposed Sale 204 in the Western GOM OCS. This Notice is published pursuant to 30 CFR 256.29(c) as a matter of information to the public. With regard to oil and gas leasing on the OCS, the Secretary of the Interior, pursuant to section 19 of the OCS Lands Act, provides the affected States the opportunity to review the proposed Notice. The proposed Notice sets forth the proposed terms and conditions of the sale, including minimum bids, royalty rates, and rentals.

# DATES:

                        Comments on the size, timing, or location of proposed Sale 204 are due from the affected States within 60 days following their receipt of the proposed Notice. The final Notice of Sale will be published in the                         **Federal Register**                         at least 30 days prior to the date of bid opening. Bid opening is currently scheduled for August 22, 2007.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The proposed Notice of Sale for Sale 204 and a “Proposed Sale Notice Package” containing information essential to potential bidders may be obtained from the Public Information Unit, Gulf of Mexico Region, Minerals Management Service, 1201 Elmwood Park Boulevard, New Orleans, Louisiana 70123-2394. Telephone: (504) 736-2519.

Dated: April 6, 2007.

R. M. “Johnnie” Burton,

Director, Minerals Management Service.

[FR Doc. 07-1804  Filed 4-10-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-MR-M
#### Narcissus E. Chamberlain, *Appellant, v.*Thomas A. Chamberlain, Re*sponden*t.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Gilbert, J.
§ 91.12 Definitions of normal operation and statutory objective. For purposes of §§ 91.13 and 91.14, the terms *normal operation* and *statutory objective* shall have the following meaning: ( a ) *Normal operation* means the operation of a program or activity without significant changes that would impair its ability to meet its objectives.
( b ) *Statutory objective* means any purpose of a program or activity expressly stated in any Federal statute, State statute, or local statute or ordinance adopted by an elected, general purpose legislative body.
§ 81.131 Definitions. The definitions contained in § 80.13 of this subtitle apply to this part, unless the context otherwise requires, and the term *reviewing authority* as used herein includes the Secretary of Health and Human Services, with respect to action by that official under § 81.106. Transition provisions: (a) The amendments herein shall become effective upon publication in the Federal Register. ( b ) These rules shall apply to any proceeding or part thereof to which part 80 of this title as amended effective October 19, 1967 (published in the Federal Register for October 19, 1967), and as the same may be hereafter amended, applies. In the case of any proceeding or part thereof governed by the provisions of part 80 as that part existed prior to such amendment, and rules in this part 81 shall apply as if these amendments were not in effect.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 22, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50590 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LUIS RAYMUNDO HERNANDEZ-MACIAS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-03-CR-373-ALL-DB

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Luis Raymundo Hernandez-Macias appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Hernandez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Hernandez maintains that he pleadedNo. 03-50590 -2- guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Hernandez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Certification of Chief Financial Officer

In connection  with the Annual Report of Pure Bioscience (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Gary Brownell,  Chief Financial Officer certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

October 29, 2003                 /s/ Gary Brownell
-------------------              -----------------------------------
                                 Gary Brownell
                                 Chief Executive Officer