alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 90.34 Agency reports. Each agency shall submit to the Secretary not later than December 31 of each year, beginning in 1979, a report which: ( a ) Describes in detail the steps taken during the preceding fiscal year to carry out the Act; and
( b ) Contains data on the frequency, type, and resolution of complaints and on any compliance reviews, sufficient to permit analysis of the agency's progress in reducing age discrimination in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the agency; and
( c ) Contains data directly relevant to the extent of any pattern or practice of age discrimination which the agency has identified in any programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the agency and to progress toward eliminating it; and
( d ) Contains evaluative or interpretative information which the agency determines is useful in analyzing agency progress in reducing age discrimination in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the agency; and
( e ) Contains whatever other data the Secretary may require.
[44 FR 33776, June 12, 1979, as amended at 70 FR 24321, May 9, 2005]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                            9,909
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            3,267
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                      0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                      0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      16,103
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                                0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                  0
<LOANS>                                         268,560
<ALLOWANCE>                                       1,679
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  316,585
<DEPOSITS>                                      220,237
<SHORT-TERM>                                     24,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               2,989
<LONG-TERM>                                      33,073
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                             28
<OTHER-SE>                                       34,223
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  316,585
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  20,300
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 1,171
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    385
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 21,856
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                9,226
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               11,807
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            10,049
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       480
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   11
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   8,827
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2,132
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        2,132
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1,192
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.58
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    0.036
<LOANS-NON>                                         435
<LOANS-PAST>                                        134
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    314
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     250
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  1,256
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        57
<RECOVERIES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 1,679
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              1,679
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             179



</TABLE>
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000560

23-DEC-2015

09:55 AM
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.1102 Handling and disposal of NLS residue: Categories A, B, C, and D. ( a ) Except those Category A NLS residues that must be discharged under paragraph (c) of this section, NLS residue from an NLS whose vapor pressure is 5 kPa (50 mbar) or less at 20 °C (68 °F) must be— Note to paragraph ( a
):
The Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act allows specific liquids to be discharged to the sea under permits issued by the EPA.
( 1 ) Unloaded to any consignee;
( 2 ) Returned to the shipper;
( 3 ) Discharged to a reception facility;
( 4 ) Retained on the ship; or
( 5 ) Discharged to the sea under § 153.1126 or § 153.1128.
( b ) Except those Category A NLS residues that must be discharged under paragraph (c) of this section, NLS residue from an NLS whose vapor pressure is greater than 5 kPa (50 mbar) at 20 °C must be— ( 1 ) Handled in the same way as the NLS residue under paragraph (a) of this section; or
( 2 ) Ventilated following a ventilation procedure in the approved Procedures and Arrangements Manual. Note:
The Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 *et seq*) allows states to regulate emissions from tank ventilation. There may be other regulations, both local and Federal, that affect the use of tank ventilation for safety or environmental purposes.
( c ) NLS residue containing Category A NLS in pumproom bilges and in spill trays at the manifold must be discharged to a reception facility.
[CGD 81-101, 52 FR 7785, Mar. 12, 1987, as amended by CGD 81-101, 53 FR 28975, Aug. 1, 1988 and 54 FR 12629, Mar. 28, 1989]
----

*go to a larger version of Plate 6 (5.5MB)**go to metadata for this field activity, A-1-98-HW*

----

----

----

SusanA. Cochran

U.S. Department of the Interior,U.S.Geological Survey,Western RegionCoastal and Marine Geology
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 14-20587

Honorable Sean F. Cox

Marquan Franklin Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

On December 8, 2015, Defendant Marquan Leroy Franklin filed a Motion to Vacate, Set

Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, claiming ineffective assistance of trial

counsel. (Doc. # 25). Franklin’s motion was subsequently referred to Magistrate Judge R.

Steven Whalen pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). 

On December 9, 2016, Magistrate Judge Whalen issued a Report and Recommendation,

wherein he notes that Franklin had voluntarily opted to dismiss his § 2255 motion. (Doc. # 48,

R&R). Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Franklin’s § 2255 motion be

dismissed. 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d)(2), a party objecting to the

recommended disposition of a matter by a Magistrate Judge must file objections to the R&R

within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the R&R. “The district judge to

whom the case is assigned shall make a de novo determination upon the record, or after

additional evidence, of any portion of the magistrate judge’s disposition to which specific written

2:14-cr-20587-SFC-RSW Doc # 49 Filed 01/18/17 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 219
objection has been made.” Id. 

The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired and the docket reflects that neither

party has filed objections to the R&R. The Court hereby ADOPTS the December 9, 2016 R&R. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Franklin’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct

Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DISMISSED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S/Sean F. Cox 

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge

Dated: January 18, 2017

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on

January 18, 2017, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Jennifer McCoy 

Case Manager

2:14-cr-20587-SFC-RSW Doc # 49 Filed 01/18/17 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 220
21st Century Holding Company

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION  OF  CHIEF  FINANCIAL  OFFICER  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  302  OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, James G. Jennings III, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-Q/A of 21st Century Holding
Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
      disclosures  controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,  including
      its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
      entities,  particularly  during the  period in which this  report is being
      prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions  about  the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,  as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c)  Disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
      control over  financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially  affected,  or is reasonably
      likely to  materially  affect,  the  registrant's  internal  control  over
      financial reporting; and;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
      operation  of  internal   control  over  financial   reporting  which  are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: December 9, 2005.


/s/ James G. Jennings, III

Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Peter E. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of Saba Software, Inc. (the Company) hereby
certify, as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: April 14, 2006



By:

/s/ Peter E. Williams IIIPeter E. Williams IIIChief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MALCOLM BEATON, 

 

 Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 

 14-CV-13590 

vs. 

 Honorable Patrick J. Duggan 

CITY OF ALLEN PARK, et al., 

 

 Defendants. 

_____________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT JOYCE PARKER’S MOTION FOR 

PROTECTIVE ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY 

 This is a First Amendment retaliation case. Plaintiff Malcolm Beaton is 

suing (1) the City of Allen Park, (2) its mayor, William Matakas, and (3) its 

emergency manager, Joyce Parker. There are two dispositive defense motions 

presently pending: a motion to dismiss, filed by Defendant Parker on December 

23, 2014, and a motion for summary judgment, filed by Defendants City of Allen 

Park and Matakas on January 7, 2015. Both motions are fully briefed. 

 In addition, Defendant Parker filed a motion for protective order on 

December 23, 2014, urging the Court to stay discovery in this case pending the 

resolution of the two presently-pending dispositive motions. Plaintiff opposes a 

stay of discovery. The Court has reviewed the briefs submitted by the parties and 

concludes that a stay of discovery pending resolution of the two presently-pending 

2:14-cv-13590-PJD-MKM Doc # 36 Filed 02/20/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 379
2 

defense motions is appropriate, especially because Defendant Parker asserts in her 

motion to dismiss that she is entitled to qualified immunity. See Hahn v. Star 

Bank, 190 F.3d 708, 719 (6th Cir. 1999) (“Trial courts have broad discretion and 

inherent power to stay discovery until preliminary questions that may dispose of 

the case are determined.”); Criss v. City of Kent, 867 F.2d 259, 261 (6th Cir. 1988) 

(“[D]iscovery in litigation against government officials should be halted until the 

threshold question of immunity is resolved.”). Accordingly, Defendant Parker’s 

motion for protective order is GRANTED and discovery is STAYED until further 

order of the Court. 

 SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 20, 2015 s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Copies to: 

Raymond Guzall , III, Esq. 

Audrey J. Forbush, Esq. 

Denise C. Barton, Esq. 

Erik A. Grill, Esq. 

2:14-cv-13590-PJD-MKM Doc # 36 Filed 02/20/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 380
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 2 (Thursday, January 4, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-00003]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 2 / Thursday, January 4, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 451]]


                Proclamation 8096 of December 29, 2006

                
To Extend Nondiscriminatory Treatment (Normal 
                Trade Relations Treatment) to the Products of Vietnam

                By the President of the United States of America

                A Proclamation

                1. Vietnam has demonstrated a strong desire to build a 
                friendly and cooperative relationship with the United 
                States and has been found to be in full compliance with 
                the freedom of emigration requirements under title IV 
                of the Trade Act of 1974 (the ``1974 Act'') (19 U.S.C. 
                2431 et seq.).

                2. Pursuant to section 4002 of H.R. 6111, signed on 
                December 20, 2006, I hereby determine that chapter 1 of 
                title IV of the 1974 Act (19 U.S.C. 2431-2439) should 
                no longer apply to Vietnam.

                NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the 
                United States of America, acting under the authority 
                vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the 
                United States of America, including but not limited to 
                section 4002 of Public Law 109-432 do proclaim that:

                1. Nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade relations 
                treatment) shall be extended to the products of 
                Vietnam, which shall no longer be subject to chapter 1 
                of title IV of the 1974 Act.

                2. The extension of nondiscriminatory treatment to the 
                products of Vietnam shall be effective as of the date 
                of signature of this proclamation.

                3. All provisions of previous proclamations and 
                Executive Orders that are inconsistent with this 
                proclamation are superseded to the extent of such 
                inconsistency.

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 
                twenty-ninth day of December, in the year of our Lord 
                two thousand six, and of the Independence of the United 
                States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

[FR Doc. 07-00003
Filed 1-3-07; 11:03 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.230 Type I system. A type I containment system must meet the following requirements: ( a ) The vessel must meet the requirements in subpart F of part 172 of this chapter for a type I hull.
( b ) Except as described in § 153.235: ( 1 ) It may be no closer to the tankship's shell than 76 cm (approx. 29.9 in.); and
( 2 ) It may not be located in any part of the tankship subject to the damage described in Table 172.135 of this chapter for: ( i ) Collision Penetration, Transverse extent; and
( ii ) Grounding Penetration, Vertical extents from the baseline upward.
[CGD 73-96, 42 FR 49027, Sept. 26, 1977, as amended by CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51009, Nov. 4, 1983]
# C_2011226EN.01001701.xml

| 30.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/17

---

Appeal brought on 30 May 2011 by the European Commission against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Third Chamber) on 22 March 2011 in Case T-369/07 Republic of Latvia v European Commission

(Case C-267/11 P)

2011/C 226/32

Language of the case: Latvian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: E. White and I. Rubene)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Republic of Latvia, Republic of Lithuania, Slovak Republic, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Set aside the judgment under appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the judgment under appeal.

| — | Order the Republic of Latvia to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Republic of Latvia to pay the costs.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

The single ground of appeal is based on a failure to respect the three-month time-limit laid down in Article 9(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC. (1)

1

The Commission considers that, in its analysis, the General Court treated the first and second sentences of Article 9(3) as one and, consequently, that its interpretation is not in line with the objectives laid down in that paragraph.

That interpretation of Article 9(3) of the directive is contrary to the interpretation which the General Court adopted in another case, in which it rightly considered that the second sentence of Article 9(3) constituted a separate legal basis.

In its interpretation of Article 9(3) of the directive, the Commission relies on the literal wording of the provision, which is fully in line with the objective pursued by that provision. Consequently, if the Commission rejects the national allocation plan notified by a Member State, the latter will be required to amend that plan taking account of the Commission's objections and will not be able to execute the plan until the Commission has approved the amendments, for which there is no time-limit.

The Commission notes that the contested decision was a decision on the amendments to the national allocation plan and not on the notified national allocation plan itself.

However, given that the General Court did not consider that the second sentence of Article 9(3) of the directive established a different procedure, it found itself required to consider the notified amendments as notification of a new national allocation plan and, as a result, required to apply the three-month time-limit incorrectly.

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 275, p. 32.

1

---
§ 15.855 Cabin watchmen and fire patrolmen. ( a ) On vessels carrying passengers at night, the master or person in charge must ensure that a suitable number of watchmen are in the vicinity of the cabins or staterooms and on each deck, to guard against and give alarm in case of fire or other danger.
( b ) On a fish processing vessel of more than 100 GRT, there must be a suitable number of watchmen trained in firefighting onboard when hot work is being done, to guard against and give alarm in case of a fire.
( c ) For the watchmen described in paragraph (a) of this section, the owner or operator of an uninspected passenger vessel not more than 300 GRT may substitute the use of fire detectors, heat detectors, smoke detectors, and high-water alarms with audible- and visual-warning indicators, in addition to other required safety alarms, only when each of the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) Fire detectors are located in each space containing machinery or fuel tanks per § 181.400(c) of this chapter.
( 2 ) All grills, broilers, and deep-fat fryers are fitted with a grease extraction hood per § 181.425 of this chapter.
( 3 ) Heat and/or smoke detectors are located in each galley, public accommodation space, enclosed passageway, berthing space, and all crew spaces.
( 4 ) High-water alarms are located in each space with a through hull fitting below the deepest load waterline, a machinery space bilge, bilge well, shaft alley bilge, or other space subject to flooding from sea water piping within the space, and a space below the waterline with non-watertight closure such as a space with a non-watertight hatch on the main deck.
( 5 ) Each alarm has an audible- and visual-alarm indicator located at the normal operating station and, if the normal operating position is not continually manned and not navigating underway, in an alternate location that must provide the crew, and may at all times provide the passengers, immediate warning of a hazardous condition.
( 6 ) The vessel is underway for no more than 12 hours in any 24-hour period, and the master of the vessel has chosen to operate with less than a three-watch system in accordance with § 15.705 of this part.
[CGD 81-059, 52 FR 38652, Oct. 16, 1987, as amended by USCG-1999-5040, 67 FR 34767, May 15, 2002; USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 78008, Dec. 24, 2013]