alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 141.225 Alternate arrangements or equipment. ( a ) Alternate arrangements or equipment to comply with this part may be approved in accordance with § 136.115 of this subchapter.
( b ) If a Towing Safety Management System (TSMS) is applicable to the towing vessel, alternative means for complying with §§ 141.340, 141.350, and 141.360 may be approved by a third-party organization (TPO) and documented in the TSMS applicable to the vessel.
( c ) The Coast Guard may approve a novel lifesaving appliance or arrangement as an equivalent if it has performance characteristics at least equivalent to the appliance or arrangement required under this subchapter, and if it has been evaluated and tested under IMO Resolution A.520(13) (incorporated by reference, see § 136.112 of this subchapter). Requests for evaluation of novel lifesaving appliances must be sent to the Commandant (CG-ENG).
( d ) The cognizant OCMI may require a towing vessel to carry specialized or additional lifesaving equipment if: ( 1 ) He or she determines that the conditions of the voyage render the requirements of this part inadequate; or
( 2 ) The towing vessel is operated in globally remote areas or severe environments not covered under this part. Such areas may include, but are not limited to, polar regions, remote islands, areas of extreme weather, and other remote areas where timely emergency assistance cannot be anticipated.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b)
      AND 15d-14(b)**


**(Section 906
      Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002)**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of International Imaging Sytems, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert
      Scherne, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
      and belief:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of
                the
                Company.




/s/  *Robert
      Scherne*


Robert
      Scherne


Chief
      Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)


International
      Imaging Systems, Inc.





This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
      of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|EXHIBIT 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Belcrest Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                       



|Date: August 10, 2009
|---------------------



| | /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.Thomas E. Faust Jr.Chief Executive Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 140.100 Purpose.

This part contains the health, safety, and operational requirements for towing vessels and the crewmembers serving onboard them.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 60 (Thursday, March 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1529]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on CARES Business Plan Studies; Notice of 
Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Advisory 
Committee on CARES Business Plan Studies has scheduled a meeting on 
April 17, 2007, at Montrose VA Medical Center, Building 15, Room 7, 
2094 Albany Post Road, Montrose, New York. The meeting will convene at 
4 p.m. and conclude at 7 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice to the Secretary 
of Veterans Affairs on proposed business plans at those VA facility 
sites identified in May 2004 as requiring further study by the Capital 
Asset Realignment for Enhanced Services (CARES) Decision document.
    The objective of the meeting is for the CARES contractor to present 
the business plan options, for the VA Montrose and Castle Point 
campuses, recommended to VA for further study and those selected by VA. 
The Committee will provide recommendations to the contractor regarding 
issues to be addressed in the Stage 2 study of the options selected by 
VA. The agenda will accommodate public commentary on the issues to be 
addressed in Stage 2 of the CARES study.
    Interested persons may attend and present oral or written 
statements to the Committee. For additional information regarding the 
meeting, please contact Mr. Jay Halpern, Designated Federal Officer, 
(00CARES), at 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, by phone 
at (202) 273-5994, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5c363d2572343d302c392e321c342d72313938722a3d723b332a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5933382077313835293c2b3719312877343c3d772f38773e362f">[email protected]</span></a>.


    Dated: March 22, 2007.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-1529 Filed 3-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
OKLAHOMA 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

STEVEN A. THOMPSON 	 BRAD HENRY 

Execulive Director OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 	 Governor

February 22,2008 

Koch Nitrogen Co. 


Attn: Mr. Cody Greenfield 


1619 S. 78th. 


Enid, OK 73072 


. Subject: 	 Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Waiver 


Enid Nitrogen Plant 


Dear Mr. Greenfield: 

The Oklahoma Department ofEnvironmental Quality (ODEQ) received a BART waiver 

request for the reference~ site on December 1, 2006. . 

After the technical review, the ODEQ is approving a waiver for the Enid Plant. This 

waiver is based on facility BART sources which are not expecte4 to cause or contribute 

to 'visibility impacts at Class I areas based on submitted modeling. 

While ODEQ has approved the waiver, the waiver is subject to EPA and public comment 

during the Regional Haze State Implementation Program (SIP) approval process. 

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If we may be of further service, please 

contact Phillip Fielder (405) 702-4100. 

707 NORTH ROBINSON, P.O. BOX 1677, OKlAHOMA CITY, OKlAHOMA 73101 c1677 

printed on recycled paper with soy ink 

o
# C_2013114EN.01004603.xml

| 20.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/46

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 21 February 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-113/11) (1)

1

(Civil service - Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure - Application lodged by fax within the time-limit for bringing proceedings - Lawyer’s hand-written signature different from that on the original application received by post - Action lodged out of time - Manifestly inadmissible)

2013/C 114/70

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and J. Banquero Cruz, Agents, and A. Dala Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Civil service — Application for annulment of the Commission’s implied decision rejecting the applicant’s claim for payment of arrears of remuneration owing for the month of August 2010.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2012, p. 69.

1

---
#### § 144.405 Fire hazards to be minimized.

Each vessel must be designed and constructed to minimize fire hazards insofar as reasonable and practicable.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2173 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2173

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 4, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1009 Crystal Road in Island Falls, Maine, as the ``Carl B. Smith 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CARL B. SMITH POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1009 Crystal Road in Island Falls, Maine, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Carl B. Smith Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Carl B. 
Smith Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.554 Cargo hose: Bursting pressure.

Cargo hose that may be exposed to the pressure in the cargo tank, the cargo pump discharge, or the vapor compressor discharge must have a bursting pressure of at least five times the maximum working pressure on the hose during cargo transfer.
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.970 Cargo transfer piping. The person in charge of cargo transfer shall ensure that: ( a ) Cargo is transferred to or from a cargo tank only through the tankship's cargo piping system;
( b ) Vapor not returned to shore through the tankship's vapor return system is discharged at the height required for the cargo's vent riser in Table 1, and
( c ) All cargo vapor is returned to shore through the valved connection on the venting system if: ( 1 ) The cargo requires closed gauging, is referenced to § 153.372 or is referenced to § 153.525;
( 2 ) The transfer terminal has vapor return equipment; and
( 3 ) In his estimation the vapor return equipment is adequate to handle the vapor expected from the tank.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BIG GUY’S PINBALL, LLC

Case No. 2:14-CV-14185-VAR-RSW

Plaintiff,

Honorable VICTORIA A. ROBERTS

v. U.S. District Judge, Presiding

JIMMY LIPHAM, Honorable R. STEVEN WHALEN

U.S. Magistrate Judge, Referral

Defendant.

 /

NOTICE THAT BRIEFING WILL RESUME

REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION (ECF#21/22)

Plaintiff, through their counsel and pursuant to the Court’s Order Temporarily Staying

Proceedings (ECF#30), hereby notify the Court and Defendant that briefing with respect to

Defendant’s Motion (ECF#21/22) will resume. Pursuant to said order, Plaintiff’s will file their

response on or before April 14, 2015. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Robert Farr, attorney for Plaintiff, certifies that on March 31, 2015 I filed (a) Plaintiff’s

Notice that Briefing Will Resume Regarding Defendant’s Motion (ECF#21/22), and (b) this

Certificate of Service via the Court’s CM/ECF system, which will provide notice and service of

those documents upon all parties via their counsel of record. 

ROBERT A. FARR, PLLC

By: s/ Robert Farr (P61597) 

Attorney for Plaintiff

1050 Shiawassee Circle

Howell, Michigan 48843

(248) 703-0662

March 31, 2015 rfarr@rfarrlaw.com

2:14-cv-14185-VAR-RSW Doc # 31 Filed 03/31/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 252
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.806 Capacity of pressure relief valves. Pressure relief valves for each cargo tank must have a combined relief capacity, including the effects of back pressure from vent piping, headers, and masts, to discharge the greater of the following with not more than a 20% rise in cargo tank pressure above the set pressure of the relief valves: ( a ) The maximum capacity of an installed cargo tank inerting system if the maximum attainable working pressure of the cargo tank inerting system exceeds the set pressure of the relief valves.
( b ) The quantity of vapors generated from fire exposure that is calculated under § 54.15-25 of this chapter.
89–008 

111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 111–566 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION (H. 

CON. RES. 301) DIRECTING THE PRESIDENT, PURSUANT TO SECTION 5(c) 

OF THE WAR POWERS RESOLUTION, TO REMOVE THE UNITED STATES 

ARMED FORCES FROM PAKISTAN 

JULY 26, 2010.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1556] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1556, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H. Con. Res. 301, the 

‘‘Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove the United States Armed Forces from 

Pakistan,’’ under a closed rule. The resolution provides one hour of 

debate in the House with 30 minutes to be controlled by Rep. 

Kucinich and 30 minutes to be equally divided and controlled by 

the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs. The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of the concurrent resolution. The resolution provides 

that the concurrent resolution shall be considered as read. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

Although the rule waives all points of order against consideration 

of the concurrent resolution, the committee is not aware of any 

points of order. The waiver is prophylactic. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with REPORTS
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.040-2 Type and size. ( a ) Impulse-projected rocket type line-throwing appliances required by this subpart shall be of a type consisting essentially of a pistol or launcher, which can be hand held and hand directed, or suitably supported and hand directed.
( b ) Impulse-projected rocket type line-throwing appliances shall weigh (complete with one rocket, bridle, and leader) not to exceed 16 kg (35 lb.) and shall be of a size easily manageable by one person.
( c ) Alternate arrangements which meet the performance requirements of this subpart will be given special consideration. Line-throwing appliances meeting the requirements of MIL-L-45505 Type I will be considered as meeting the requirements of this subpart subject to approval of the Commandant.
On appellant’s petition for reconsideration filed March 20,

petition for reconsideration allowed; opinion (139 Or App 446, 912 P2d 921) modified and adhered to as modified May 1,

petition for review denied September 24, 1996 (324 Or 229)

#### STATE OF OREGON, *Respondent, v.*TIMOTHY ALAN HINKHOUSE, *Appellant.*

(C9309-36386; CA A84175)

915 P2d 489

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Peter Gartlan, Deputy Public Defender, for petition.

Before Riggs, Presiding Judge, and Landau and Leeson, Judges.

LANDAU, J.

*576LANDAU, J.

Defendant petitions for reconsideration of our opinion, *State v. Hinkhouse,*139 Or App 446, 912 P2d 921 (1996), in which we affirmed his convictions on multiple counts of attempted murder and attempted first-degree assault. Defendant had challenged the trial court’s denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal, arguing that the evidence failed to show that he intended to kill or to cause serious bodily injury. The state argued that the evidence, which showed that defendant knowingly engaged in repeated unprotected sexual intercourse with a number of victims while HIV positive, was sufficient to support the trial court’s ruling. We agreed with the state and affirmed.

Defendant now argues that, in the course of our opinion, we referred to a hearsay statement from a presentence investigation report relied upon by one of the state’s experts to the effect that defendant intended to spread his disease to others, and that such evidence may not be considered in evaluating the trial court’s ruling. We assume, for the sake of argument, that the hearsay statement may not be considered as substantive evidence of defendant’s intent to commit murder and first degree assault. We nevertheless conclude that the evidence set out in detail in the balance of our previous opinion is sufficient to enable a jury to conclude, beyond a reasonable doubt, that defendant intended to cause serious bodily injury and death.

Petition for reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

DATE & TIME: THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2017 AT 10:00 A.M. 

PLACE: 999 E STREET, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. (NINTH FLOOR)

STATUS: THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Proposed Final Audit Report on the Conservative Campaign Committee (A13-15)

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Kansas Democratic Party 

(KDP) (A13-08)

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on Kind for Congress Committee 

(KFCC) (A15-02)

Management and Administrative Matters

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language 

interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Dayna C. Brown,

Acting Secretary and Clerk, at (202)694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting 

date.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Signed: _____________________________________

Dayna C. Brown

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission

Submitted: February 2, 2017
EXHIBIT 4.7.1

                  Schedule of Omitted Documents in the Form of
                    Exhibit 4.7, including Material Detail in
                  Which Such Documents Differ from Exhibit 4.7


1.       Warrant to purchase 5,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price
         of $1.25 per share issued to Dian Griesel, dated May 1, 1998; become
         exercisable on July 1, 1998.

2.       Warrant to purchase 5,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price
         of $1.50 per share issued to Dian Griesel, dated May 1, 1998; become
         exercisable on October 1, 1998.

3.       Warrant to purchase 4,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price
         of $1.75 per share issued to Jacqueline Resto, dated May 1, 1998;
         become exercisable on January 1, 1999.

4.       Warrant to purchase 1,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price
         of $1.75 per share issued to Takashi Crum, dated May 1, 1998; become
         exercisable on January 1, 1999.

         The form of the documents listed above does not differ in material
detail from the form of Exhibit 4.7 except with respect to the name of the
holder, the exercise price and the date the warrant becomes exercisable.


<PAGE>