alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.001-1 Scope. ( a ) This subpart contains the general: ( 1 ) Characteristics of life preservers;
( 2 ) Approval procedures for life preservers; and
( 3 ) Production oversight requirements for life preservers.
( b ) Other subparts in this part specify the detailed requirements for standard type life preservers and may supplement the requirements in this subpart.
[CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51209, Sept. 30, 1997, as amended by USCG-2013-0263, 79 FR 56499, Sept. 22, 2014]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SUPERIOR SERVICES,  INC. AS OF AND FOR THE
TWELVE  MONTHS  ENDED  DECEMBER  31, 1996 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         23,657
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  25,916
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,223)
<INVENTORY>                                    800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               52,943
<PP&E>                                         242,724
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (93,499)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 256,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          41,987
<BONDS>                                        18,814
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       261
<OTHER-SE>                                     133,010
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   256,183
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               180,720
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  123,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1,655
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,617
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                26,217
<INCOME-TAX>                                   9,814
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            16,403
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   16,403
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .64
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

STUART C. IRBY COMPANY, 

Plaintiff,

v.

BAYVIEW ELECTRIC COMPANY, LLC,

Defendant. 

 /

Case No. 14-51092

ORDER GRANTING IN PART APPLICATION FOR RELIEF FROM 

LOCAL COUNSEL REQUIREMENT

On August 12, 2014, Plaintiff filed the present action to enforce a judgment

issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi. 

Plaintiff asks the court to waive its local counsel requirement which states: 

A member of the bar of this court who appears as attorney of record in the

district court and is not an active member of the State Bar of Michigan must

specify as local counsel a member of the bar of this court with an office in the

district. . . . On application, the court may relieve an attorney who is not an

active member of the State Bar of Michigan of the obligation to specify local

counsel.

E.D. Mich. Local R. 83.20(f)(1). On the assumption that the litigation in this court will be

entirely on the papers, the motion is granted. However, if in-court action is required, this

order shall not control, and Plaintiff will need to specify local counsel at that time. 

Accordingly, 

2:14-mc-51092-RHC-PJK Doc # 4 Filed 08/25/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 7
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Application for Relief from Local Counsel

Requirement” (Dkt. # 3) is GRANTED IN PART as specified above. 

 s/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: August 25, 2014

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, August 25, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 s/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C2 ORDERS\14-51092.STUARTIRBY.OrderGrantReliefLocalCounsel.jac.wpd

2

2:14-mc-51092-RHC-PJK Doc # 4 Filed 08/25/14 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 8
#### § 108.231 Application.

Sections 108.231 through 108.241 apply to each unit with a helicopter landing facility.
# C_2011139EN.01003002.xml

| 7.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/30

---

Action brought on 9 February 2011 — Vincent Bouillez and Others v Council

(Case F-11/11)

2011/C 139/56

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Vincent Bouillez (Overijse, Belgium) and Others (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the appointing authority not to promote the applicants to a higher grade for the promotions year 2010

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Council’s decision of 3 November 2010 dismissing the applicants’ complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Council’s decision of 3 November 2010 dismissing the applicants’ complaint;

| — | In so far as necessary, annul the decisions not to promote the applicants to a higher grade for the promotions year 2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

In so far as necessary, annul the decisions not to promote the applicants to a higher grade for the promotions year 2010;

| — | Order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council to pay the costs.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                          Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
NetLojix Communications, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
333-78963) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-30725, 333-53435, and 333-64769) on Form
S-8 of NetLojix Communications, Inc. (formerly AvTel Communications, Inc.) of
our report dated February 18, 2000, except as to Note 13, which is as of March
2, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of NetLojix Communications,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows and
related schedule, for each of the years in the three-year period ended December
31, 1999, which report appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form
10-K of NetLojix Communications, Inc.

                                    KPMG LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 27, 2000

                                      E-84
§ 144.515 One means of escape required. Only one means of escape is required from a space where: ( a ) The space has a deck area less than 30 square meters (322 square feet);
( b ) There is no stove, heater, or other source of fire in the space;
( c ) The means of escape is located as far as possible from a machinery space or fuel tank; and
( d ) If an accommodation space, the single means of escape does not include a deck scuttle or a ladder.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, No. 2:13-cr-20892 

v. 

 Honorable George Caram Steeh 

 

D-14 KUTUB MESIWALA, 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________/ 

STIPULATED ORDER TO ADJOURN SENTENCING DATE 

 The United States and Defendant Kutub Mesiwala, jointly stipulate and 

agree that the date for Defendant’s sentencing be adjourned from September 5, 

2017, until February 6, 2018. 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Stephen Cincotta 

Stephen Cincotta 

Trial Attorney 

U.S. Department of Justice 

Criminal Division, Fraud Section 

1400 New York Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

Phone: 202-355-5625 

Email: Stephen.cincotta@usdoj.gov 

Counsel for United States

/s/ Martin E. Crandall (with consent) 

Martin E. Crandall 

500 Woodward Avenue, Suite 3500 

Detroit, MI 48226 

Phone: (313) 965-8413 

Email: mcrandall@clarkhill.com 

Counsel for Defendant Kutub Mesiwala.

 

Dated: August 14, 2017 

2:13-cr-20892-GCS-RSW Doc # 464 Filed 08/14/17 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 3447
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s date for sentencing is adjourned from 

September 5, 2017, until February 6, 2018 at 2:30 p.m. 

SO ORDERED 

Dated: August 14, 2017 s/George Caram Steeh 

Hon. George Caram Steeh 

United States District Judge 

2:13-cr-20892-GCS-RSW Doc # 464 Filed 08/14/17 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 3448
#### § 690.119 Research undertaken without the intention of involving human subjects.

Except for research waived under § 690.101(i) or exempted under § 690.104, in the event research is undertaken without the intention of involving human subjects, but it is later proposed to involve human subjects in the research, the research shall first be reviewed and approved by an IRB, as provided in this policy, a certification submitted by the institution to the Federal department or agency component supporting the research, and final approval given to the proposed change by the Federal department or agency component.
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.3 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to prescribe rules for new and existing gas vessels.
--------------

......... 

SERVED: AUGUST 22, 2012 

...• , •.. I J ~r ji lUt_ . ·. ;: i:Jli, t:1'T~Jlrci.\IT ('JF 

:; ': ,, ',;, hit0t t·I"Dl'~'R.TA.f'QI\1 )i ~ l"l~ U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION : ·,·,:r-1

'· np~cqA·!·~OP-jl:' OFFICE OF HEARINGS I • .. 'I .,,, '· Ll I I I i j . 1.) 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SKYWEST AIRLINES 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0872 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretof~re designated as Case No. 2011NM060047) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 
........ 

-------------

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 1 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000

1

. 

Todd C. Emerson, Respondent's Counsel 

Director- Government and Legal Affairs 

SkyWest Airlines 

444 South River Road 

St. George, UT 84 790 

TEL: 435-634-3530 

FAX: 435-634-3505 

ONE COPY 

Jeffrey M. Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2161 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0872 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.174-3 Incorporation by reference. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76702 , Sept. 18, 2024.
( a ) Certain materials are incorporated by reference into this subchapter with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register. The Office of the Federal Register publishes a table, “Material Approved for Incorporation by Reference,” which appears in the Finding Aids section of this volume. In that table is found citations to the particular sections of this part where the material is incorporated and the date of the approval by the Director of the Federal Register. To enforce any edition other than the one listed in paragraph (b) of the section, notice of change must be published in the Federal Register and the material made available. All approved material is on file at the Office of the Federal Register, Washington, DC 20408, and at Coast Guard Headquarters. Contact Commandant (CG-ENG-4), Attn: Lifesaving and Fire Safety Division, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509, Washington, DC 20593-7126.
( b ) The materials approved for incorporation by reference in this subpart are:
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) *100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.* ASTM C 177-85 (1993), Standard Test Method for Steady-State Heat Flux Measurements and Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Guarded-Hot-Plate Apparatus—160.174-17 ASTM C 518-91, Standard Test Method for Steady-State Heat Flux Measurements and Thermal Transmission Properties by Means of the Heat Flow Meter Apparatus—160.174-17 ASTM D 975-98, Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel Oils—160.174-17 ASTM D 1004-94a, Standard Test Method for Initial Tear Resistance of Plastic Film and Sheeting—160.174-17 ASTM D 1518-85 (1990), Standard Test Method for Thermal Transmittance of Textile Materials—160.174-17 General Services Administration *Specification Unit (WFSIA), Regional Office Building, Room 6039, 7th and D Streets SW., Washington, DC 20407* Federal Standard No. 751a—Stitches, Seams, and Stitchings. National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 440—Color, Universal Language and Dictionary of Names.
[CGD 84-069b, 51 FR 19343, May 29, 1986, as amended by CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50467, Sept. 29, 1995; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50733, Sept. 27, 1996; CGD 97-057, 62 FR 51049, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-1999-6216, 64 FR 53228, Oct. 1, 1999; USCG-1999-5151, 64 FR 67184, Dec. 1, 1999; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49238, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60159, Sept. 30, 2013]
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-2028

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

William D. Marshall, also known as B.G.

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

____________

 Submitted: January 12, 2015

 Filed: March 17, 2015 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SMITH, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

William D. Marshall pled guilty to distributing cocaine base in violation of 21

U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B). He appeals as unreasonable the district court’s1

1

The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Arkansas.
within-Guidelines sentence of 140 months’ imprisonment. Having jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

Marshall does not challenge the Guidelines range of 140 to 175 months. He

claims his unfortunate childhood warrants a downward variance. This court reviews

a sentence’s reasonableness under a “deferential abuse-of-discretion” standard. Gall

v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 41 (2007). A district court “abuses its discretion when

it (1) fails to consider a relevant factor that should have received significant weight;

(2) gives significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor; or (3) considers only

the appropriate factors but in weighing those factors commits a clear error of

judgment.” United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc). 

This court reverses a district court’s sentence as substantively

unreasonable—“whether within, above, or below the applicable Guidelines

range”—only in the “unusual case.” Id. at 464 (internal quotation marks omitted). 

See United States v. Shirley, 720 F.3d 659, 665 (8th Cir. 2013) (“[A] sentence within

the guidelines is presumptively reasonable on appeal.”).

Declining to vary downward, the district court expressly considered the 18

U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. The court noted Marshall’s “unfortunate childhood” but

found it did not warrant a variance in light of his “very serious criminal history,” his

irresponsible behavior during supervision (including failing to attend drug tests and

lying to the court), his failed rehabilitation in community programs, and the

seriousness of selling cocaine. It was within the court’s “wide discretion” and

“substantial latitude” to determine the weight of these factors. See United States v.

Salazar-Aleman, 741 F.3d 878, 881 (8th Cir. 2013). Marshall relies on United States

v. Stokes, but does not point to any procedural errors on appeal. See United States v.

Stokes, 750 F.3d 767, 772 (8th Cir. 2014) (reversing sentence due to procedural error

when district court relied on government statement that had no factual support). The

-2-
district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Marshall to 140 months’

imprisonment.

The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________

-3-
§ 108.491 General. ( a ) Each portable and semi-portable fire extinguisher on a unit must be approved under subpart 162.028 or 162.039 of this chapter.
( b ) Vessels contracted for prior to August 22, 2016 must meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) Previously installed extinguishers with extinguishing capacities smaller than what is required in Table 108.495 of this subpart need not be replaced and may be continued in service so long as they are maintained in good condition to the satisfaction of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
( 2 ) All new equipment and installations must meet the applicable requirements in this subpart for new vessels.
[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48266, July 22, 2016]
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE



I, Joseph  Candelario,  hereby  certify that I am the First Vice President, Loan
Administration  of  Countrywide  Home  Loans,  Inc.,  fka,  Countrywide  Funding
Corporation,  and further  certify  with  respect to the  Pooling and  Servicing
Agreements for  Conventional  Residential  Fixed Rate & Adjustable Rate Mortgage
Loans (Inv. 977) by and among Norwest Bank of Minnesota and Countrywide  Funding
Corporation, as Servicer, as follows:

I have reviewed the activities and performance of the Servicer during the fiscal
year  ended  February  29,  1996  under  the  Agreement  and,  to the best of my
knowledge,  based on my review,  the Servicer has  fulfilled  all of its duties,
responsibilities  or  obligations  under  the Agreement through the fiscal year.



                                                   /s/Joseph Candelario  5-28-96
                                                   Joseph Candelario     Date
                                                   First Vice President
                                                   Loan Administration



                                                                         


                                                                         Inv.997
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Bobby Yazdani, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Saba Software, Inc. (the
Company) hereby certify, as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: October 10, 2007



By:

/s/ BOBBY YAZDANIBobby YazdaniChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.345 Air locks. ( a ) An air lock may be used for access from a gas-dangerous zone on the weather deck to a gas-safe space.
( b ) Each air lock must: ( 1 ) Consist of two steel doors, at least 1.5 m (4.9 ft.) but not more than 2.5 m (8.2 ft.) apart, each gasketed and tight when tested with a fire hose at not less 207 kPa gauge (30 psig);
( 2 ) Have self-closing doors with no latches or other devices for holding them open;
( 3 ) Have an audible and visual alarm on both sides which are actuated when both door securing devices are in other than the fully closed position at the same time;
( 4 ) Have mechanical ventilation in the space between the doors from a gas-safe area;
( 5 ) Have a pressure greater than that of the gas-dangerous area on the weather deck;
( 6 ) Have the rate of air change in the space between the doors of at least 8 changes per hour; and
( 7 ) Have the space between the doors monitored for cargo vapor leaks under § 154.1350.
( c ) In addition to the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, no gas-safe space on a liquefied flammable gas carrier may have an air lock unless the space: ( 1 ) Is mechanically ventilated to make the pressure in the space greater than that in the air lock; and
( 2 ) Has a means of automatically de-energizing all electrical equipment that is not explosion-proof in the space when the pressure in the space falls to or below the pressure in the air lock.
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MORRIS WEATHERSPOON, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cv-12789 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

GEORGE LNU, et al., 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________/ 

JUDGMENT 

In accordance with the Court’s Opinion and Order (1) Overruling Plaintiff’s Objections to 

the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, (2) Adopting the Magistrate Judge’s 

Recommended Disposition, (3) Granting Defendants Scheppelman and George’s Motion for 

Summary Judgment, and (4) Certifying that an Appeal Cannot Be Taken in Good Faith from this 

Order or from any of the Court’s Prior Orders Granting Summary Judgment, dated March 9, 2017, 

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and 

against Plaintiff. 

 DAVID J. WEAVER 

 CLERK OF COURT 

 By: s/Holly A. Monda 

 Deputy Clerk 

Approved: 

s/Matthew F. Leitman 

MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

United States District Judge 

Dated: March 9, 2017 

Detroit, Michigan 

2:14-cv-12789-MFL-DRG Doc # 143 Filed 03/09/17 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 996