alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RE: Tennessee Democratic Party Interim Audit Report 

Neil P. Reiff to: RHarris@fec.gov 03/11/201410:13 AM 

History: This message has been replied to and forwarded. 

Sorry, I forgot to hi t send on the email yesterday, here i s our short 

response: 

The TNDP's omission of Levin schedules L on it s Post-General Report was 

inadvertent. The information for those schedules were entered into the TNDP's 

compliance software for inclusion on the post-general report. However, the 

software (NGP) requires that a box be checked within the software to 

affirmatively include the Schedule L's so that the schedules are not included 

when there i s no Levin activit y or funds i n a Levin account. As thi s was the 

firs t time i n several years that the TNDP had reportable Levin activity , the 

committee had forgotten to check the box to include this information i n the 

report and did not realiz e that had done so unti l i t was brought to the 

attention of the committee. Once thi s was brought to the TNDP's attention, 

the committee immediately checked the box and file d an amended report. 

Nei l P. Reiff 

Sandler, Reiff,Young s Lamb, P.C. 

1025 Vermont Ave, NW 

Suite 300 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

w. (202) 479 - lll l 

f. (202) 479 - 1115 

This message i s intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which 

i t i s addressed and may contain Information that i s privileged, confidential 

and exempt from disclosure. I f the reader of thi s message i s not the intended 

recipient or any enployee or agent responsible for delivering the message to 

the Intended recipient, you are hereby notifie d that any dissemination, 

distribution , or copying of thi s communication i s strictl y prohibited. I f you 

have received thi s communication i n error, please notify us immediately by 

email. Thank you for your cooperation. 

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements irq>osed 

by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained i n thi s 

communication (including any attachments) i s not intended or written to be 

used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the 

Internal Revenue Code or (ii ) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another 

party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
§ 11.418 Service requirements for master of ocean or near-coastal self-propelled vessels of less than 500 GRT. ( a ) The minimum service required to qualify an applicant for an endorsement as master of ocean or near-coastal self-propelled vessels of less than 500 GRT is— ( 1 ) Three years total of service on ocean or near-coastal waters. Service on Great Lakes and inland waters may substitute for up to 18 months of the required service. Two years of the required service must have been as a master, mate, or equivalent position while holding a license or MMC endorsement as master, mate, or operator of uninspected passenger vessels. One year of the required service as master, mate, or equivalent position must have been on vessels of more than 50 GRT; or
( 2 ) One year of service on vessels of more than 50 GRT on ocean or near-coastal waters as a master or mate of self-propelled vessels, or master or mate of towing vessels while holding a license or MMC endorsement as mate of ocean self-propelled vessels of less than 500 GRT.
( b ) The holder of a license or MMC endorsement as master or mate (pilot) of towing vessels authorizing service on oceans or near-coastal routes is eligible for an endorsement as master of ocean or near-coastal self-propelled vessels of less than 500 GRT after both 1 year of service as master or mate of towing vessels on oceans or near-coastal routes and completion of a limited examination.
( c ) A person holding this endorsement may qualify for an STCW endorsement, according to §§ 11.307, 11.309, 11.311, 11.313, and 11.315 of this part.
§ 143.550 Steering systems. ( a ) Steering systems must meet ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels under 90 Meters (295 Feet) in Length (incorporated by reference, see § 136.112 of this subchapter), Part 4, Chapter 3, Section 3.
( b ) Steering systems on new towing vessels operating exclusively on rivers or intracoastal waterways may meet ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels for Service on Rivers and Intracoastal Waterways (incorporated by reference, see § 136.112 of this subchapter), Part 4, Chapter 2, Section 3.
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.15 Conditions under which the Coast Guard issues a Certificate of Inspection or Certificate of Compliance. ( a ) The Coast Guard issues the endorsed Certificate of Inspection required under § 153.900 for a United States ship to carry a hazardous material or NLS listed in Table 1 if— ( 1 ) The person wishing the Certificate of Inspection applies following the procedures under § 153.8; and
( 2 ) The ship meets the design and equipment requirements of this part and— ( i ) Subchapter D of this chapter if the hazardous material or NLS is flammable or combustible; or
( ii ) Either Subchapter D or I of this chapter, at the option of the ship owner, if the hazardous material or NLS is non-flammable or non-combustible.
( b ) The Coast Guard issues the endorsed Certificate of Compliance required under § 153.900 for a foreign ship to carry a hazardous material or NLS listed in Table 1 if— ( 1 ) The person wishing the Certificate of Compliance follows the procedures under § 153.9;
( 2 ) The ship has an IMO Certificate issued by its Administration and endorsed with the name of the hazardous material or NLS if the ship's Administration is signatory to MARPOL 73/78;
( 3 ) The ship meets the requirements of this part applying to United States ships and § 30.01-5(e) of this chapter if the ship's Administration is not signatory to MARPOL 73/78; and
( 4 ) The ship meets any additional design and equipment requirements specified by the Commandant (CG-ENG).
[CGD 81-101, 52 FR 7780, Mar. 12, 1987]
EX-10.39





 Exhibit 10.39 

AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This Amendment No. 3 (the “Amendment”) to that certain Employment Agreement, dated April 8, 2016 as amended
February 8, 2017 and April 6, 2018 (the “Employment Agreement”), by and between Steven Rychnovsky (the “Executive”) and Adgero Biopharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company’’), is effective as of April 6, 2020. 
 WHEREAS, the Employment Agreement, sets forth the
terms and conditions of Executive’s employment with the Company; 
 WHEREAS, the Term (as defined in the Employment Agreement)
will expire on April 8, 2020; 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement to extend the Term
until April 8, 2021; 
 WHEREAS, Section 5.3 of the Employment Agreement provides that the Employment Agreement may be
amended pursuant to an instrument in writing between the Company and Executive. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and Executive hereby
agree that the Employment Agreement shall be amended as follows: 
 1. The first sentence of Section 1.2 of the Employment Agreement is
hereby amended and restated to read as follows: 
 “The employment relationship hereunder shall be for the period commencing on the
Effective Date and, subject to earlier termination as provided in ARTICLE 4, ending on the fifth (5th) anniversary of the Effective Date (the “Term”).” 

 

	 	2.	 This Amendment shall supersede all prior agreements, whether oral or written, between the parties with respect
to the subject matter herein. 


  

	 	3.	 Except as amended herein, the Employment Agreement, shall remain in full force and effect.



  

	 	4.	 This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which is deemed to be an original but all of
which together will constitute one and the same instrument. This Amendment may be delivered via facsimile or scanned “PDF” which shall be an original for all purposes. 



[Signature Page Follows] 












 IN WITHNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of this 6th day of April, 2020. 
  

			
	Adgero Biopharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.
	
	 /s/ John Liatos

	Name: John Liatos
	Title: President & CFO
	
	Executive
	
	 /s/ Steven Rychnovsky

	Steven Rychnovsky


 [Signature Page to Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement]
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Implant Sciences Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Glenn D. Bolduc, President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Glenn D. BolducGlenn D. BolducPresident, Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 7, 2011







This certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or our staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 153

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 153.1003 Prohibited carriage in deck tanks.

When Table 1 refers to this section, cargoes may not be carried in deck tanks.

[CGD 95-900, 60 FR 34050, June 29, 1995]
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Kevin M. Sharpe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   |   |   |                                         |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | /s/ KEVIN M. SHARPE                          |
|   |   |   |                                              |
|   |   |   | **Kevin M. Sharpe, Chief Financial Officer** |

August 14, 2003

18
SUNSHINE ACT NOTICES

AGENCY: FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M

DATE & TIME: THURSDAY, MARCH 8, 2007, at 10:00 A.M.
PLACE: 999 E STREET, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. (NINTH FLOOR)
STATUS: THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.

THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE AGENDA:
Report of the Audit Division on Kucinich for President, Inc.

Report of the Audit Division on LaRouche in 2004.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: _ Mr. Robert Biersack
Press Officer
Telephone: (202)694-1220

Signed: Vn, YL. eae

Mary W. Ddve
Secretary ¢f the Commission

Transmitted to the FEDERAL REGISTER: March 1, 2007
Publication Date: March 5, 2007
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of FFD Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Trent
B. Troyer, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Trent B. Troyer
----------------------------------------
Trent B. Troyer
President and Chief Executive Officer
September 28, 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

REAPPOINTMENT TO THE COMMITTEE 

ON RULES OF EVIDENCE

:

:

:

:

NO. 775

SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5

th day of September, 2018, William M. Davis, Esquire, 

Philadelphia, is hereby reappointed as a member of the Committee on the Rules of 

Evidence for a term of three years, commencing October 1, 2018.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Andrew Hayward Jackson, Jr. v. Fort Bend County, Fort Bend 

County Drainage District, Fort Bend County Emergency 

Service District No. 7, Fort Bend County Fresh Water Supply 

District No. 01, Fort Bend County General Fund, and Fort 

Bend County Independent School District

Appellate case number: 01-22-00880-CV

Trial court case number: 21-DCV-282688

Trial court: 240th District Court of Fort Bend County

Appellant, Andrew Hayward Jackson, Jr., filed a notice of appeal from the trial 

court’s October 25, 2022 final judgment. On December 19, 2022, appellant filed a “Motion 

for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis,” requesting that he be permitted to proceed on

appeal without payment of costs. Appellant’s motion was denied on January 5, 2023, 

because the motion did not state whether appellant was permitted to proceed without 

payment of costs in the trial court; nor did appellant’s motion reflect that he filed an 

affidavit of indigence or Statement of Inability to Pay Costs in the trial court. See TEX. R.

CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(b). Further, appellant’s motion to this Court also did not 

include a Statement of Inability to Pay Costs, or any other evidence of indigency. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 20.1(c). 

On January 17, 2023, appellant filed a “Motion for Reconsideration to Proceed In 

Forma Pauperis.” With his motion, appellant attached a completed Statement of Inability 

to Pay Costs, stating that he is currently incarcerated by the Texas Department of Criminal 

Justice, Institutional Division, and has no income. The Court concludes that this is 

sufficient evidence of appellant’s inability to afford payment of costs on appeal.

Accordingly, appellant’s “Motion for Reconsideration to Proceed In Forma 

Pauperis” is granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(b), (c). The Clerk of this Court is 

directed to make an entry in this Court’s records that appellant is permitted to 

proceed on appeal without payment of costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(a); TEX. R. APP.

P. 20.1.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ April Farris__________

  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: ___January 24, 2023_____
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<CIK>     0001070371
<NAME>     FETCHOMATIC GLOBAL INTERNET INC.
<MULTIPLIER>     1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUL-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                          AUG-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                     981,294
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              199,960
<ALLOWANCES>                              (104,871)
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         1,096,121
<PP&E>                                   1,661,616
<DEPRECIATION>                            (222,885)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           3,008,169
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      477,423
<BONDS>                                  2,359,478
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    54,203
<OTHER-SE>                                 117,065
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             3,008,169
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         8,993,197
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         170,947
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (9,164,144)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (9,164,144)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                            (9,164,144)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.170)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.170)


</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 10524 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
KEVIN D. HUDSON , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05

- CR

- 121

- 1

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Kevin D. Hudson appeals the district court’s judgment revoking his two terms of supervised release. For the first time on appeal, h e argues that the district court violated his constitutional right to confront witnesses when it allowed the probation officer to testify about the out

- of

- court statements of his mother and sister. We review this newly raised argument for plain error only. See Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). To establish plain error,

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 22, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-10524 Document: 00513921787 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/22/2017No. 16

- 10524

2 Hudson must show a forfeited error that is clear or obvious and t hat affects his substantial rights. See id . If he makes such a showing, this court has the discretion to correct the error but will do so only if it seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial pr oceedings. See id

. T he out

- of

- court statements by Hudson’s mother and sister were irrelevant to the determination whether Hudson violated any of the conditions of his supervised release. Hudson pleaded true to each of the allegations in the revocation petition. T he Government int roduced the evidence in order to rebut Hudson’s proffered justifications for possessing and using controlled substances. The right to confrontation did not apply b ecause the hearsay testimony related to the revocation sentence rather than the decision to revoke supervised release. See Morrissey v. Brewer , 408 U.S. 471, 489 (1972) ; United States v. Beydoun , 469 F.3d 102, 108 (5th Cir. 2006); United States v. Giang Ho , 598 F. App’x 317, 318 (5th Cir. 2015)

. Therefore, the district court did not commit clear or obvious error when it admitted the hearsay testimony. See Puckett , 556 U.S. at 135

. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED

. Case: 16-10524 Document: 00513921787 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/22/2017
# C_2008131EN.01000501.xml

| 29.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/5

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 131/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 6.3.2008 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | N 66/08 |
| Member State | France |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Prolongation du régime cadre existant d'aide aux entreprises pour la protection de l'environnement |
| Legal basis | Programmes opérationnels pour la mise en œuvre des objectifs «compétitivité régionale et emploi» et «coopération territoriale», contrats de projet «État-région» |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Environmental protection |
| Form of aid | Direct grant, Soft loan, Interest subsidy |
| Budget | Annual budget: EUR 20 million |
| Intensity | — |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2008 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Agence de l'environnement et de la maîtrise de l'énergie (ADEME), collectivités publiques décentralisées (régions, départements, communes et leurs groupements) |
| Other information | — |

Date of adoption of the decision

6.3.2008

Reference number of the aid

N 66/08

Member State

France

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Prolongation du régime cadre existant d'aide aux entreprises pour la protection de l'environnement

Legal basis

Programmes opérationnels pour la mise en œuvre des objectifs «compétitivité régionale et emploi» et «coopération territoriale», contrats de projet «État-région»

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Environmental protection

Form of aid

Direct grant, Soft loan, Interest subsidy

Budget

Annual budget: EUR 20 million

Intensity

—

Duration

Until 31.12.2008

Economic sectors

All sectors

Name and address of the granting authority

Agence de l'environnement et de la maîtrise de l'énergie (ADEME), collectivités publiques décentralisées (régions, départements, communes et leurs groupements)

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

---