alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008219EN.01001701.xml

| 28.8.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 219/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 219/17

---

Final report of the Hearing Officer in Case COMP/M.4734 — Ineos/Kerling

(Pursuant to Articles 15 and 16 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)

(Pursuant to Articles 15 and 16 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)

(2008/C 219/14)

On 19 July 2007, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (‘the Merger Regulation’) by which the undertaking INEOS Group Limited (United Kingdom, ‘UK’), belonging to the INEOS Group (together ‘Ineos’), would acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Kerling ASA (‘Kerling’, Norway) belonging to the Norsk Hydro Group by way of purchase of shares.

After examination of the notification, the Commission found that the notified operation fell within the scope of the Merger Regulation and raised serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. Proceedings were initiated pursuant to Article 6(1)(c) of the Merger Regulation on 7 September 2007.

In response to the party's request to access to key documents in the file, the Commission services responded that in their view there were no key documents.

Following an in-depth market investigation, the Commission services concluded that the proposed transaction would not significantly impede effective competition in the common market and was therefore compatible with the common market and the EEA Agreement. Accordingly, no Statement of Objections was sent to the notifying party.

No queries or submissions have been made to me by the parties or any third party. The case does not call for any particular comments as regards the right to be heard.

Brussels, 24 January 2008.

Karen WILLIAMS

---
§ 137.310 External survey program. ( a ) The owner or managing operator of a towing vessel that has selected the TSMS option and who has chosen to demonstrates compliance through an external survey program must: ( 1 ) Have the vessel examined by a surveyor from a TPO at the intervals prescribed in § 137.300;
( 2 ) Ensure the examination is conducted in accordance with § 137.325;
( 3 ) Ensure the TSMS applicable to the vessel includes policies and procedures for complying with this section; and
( 4 ) Make the applicable sections of the TSMS available to the surveyor.
( b ) The drydock examination and internal structural examination must be documented in a report that contains the information required in § 137.135.
#### § 109.421 Report of repairs to boilers and pressure vessels.

Before making repairs, except normal repairs and maintenance such as replacement of valves or pressure seals, to boilers or unfired pressure vessels in accordance with § 50.05-10 of this chapter, the master or person in charge shall report the nature of the repairs to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Defense Industries International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Uri Nissani, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Uri Nissani
 Uri Nissani
 Chief Executive Officer




August 15, 2010
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

JACKSONVILLE DIVISION

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10-cv-1155-J-37JRK 

SAM KAZRAN a/k/a SAM KHAZRAWAN, et

al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment Against

Defendant 11-2001 LLC d/b/a Hyundai of North Jacksonville (“Defendant 11-2001 LLC”)

(Doc. No. 14; “Motion”), filed May 27, 2011.1

 In the Motion, Plaintiff is seeking a default

judgment against Defendant 11-2001 LLC because Defendant has failed to timely answer or

file a responsive pleading. See Motion at 1. On December 17, 2010, Plaintiff filed a

Complaint (Doc. No. 1) commencing this case. On February 16, 2011, service was effected

on Defendant 11-2001 LLC. See Affidavit of Service (Doc. No. 5), filed March 15, 2011. On

April 8, 2011, the Clerk entered default as to Defendant 11-2001 LLC. See Entry of Default

(Doc. No. 8). Upon review of the Motion, it is

ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendant 11-2001 LLC d/b/a

Hyundai of North Jacksonville (Doc. No. 14) is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT.

1 Plaintiff represents that a copy of the Motion was mailed to Defendant 11-2001 LLC’s

registered agent on May 27, 2011. See Certificate of Service (Doc. No. 14-3). 

Case 3:10-cv-01155-RBD-JRK Document 15 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 2 PageID 75
2. Defendant 11-2001 LLC d/b/a Hyundai of North Jacksonville shall have up to

and including July 15, 2011 to respond to the Motion, failing which the Court will treat the

Motion as unopposed. 

3. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to Defendant 11-2001 LLC

at the address provided below.

DONE AND ORDERED at Jacksonville, Florida on June 28, 2011.

wlg

Copies to:

Counsel of Record

Pro se party

Joelle Fisher

Registered Agent for 11-2001 LLC

Law Office of Robert Eckard

3110 Alternate U.S. 19 North

Palm Harbor, Florida 34682

-2-

Case 3:10-cv-01155-RBD-JRK Document 15 Filed 06/28/11 Page 2 of 2 PageID 76
Exhibit 8 List of Subsidiaries of CSR plc  Place of incorporation(or registration) andoperation


Proportion ofownership interest


Proportion ofvoting powerheld%


%Direct ownershipCambridge Silicon Radio Holdings Limited


UK



100



100Zoran Corporation


USA



100



100NordNav Technologies Aktiebolag


Sweden



100



100Indirect ownershipCambridge Silicon Radio Limited


UK



100



100APT Licensing Limited


UK



100



100UbiNetics (VPT) Limited


UK



100



100Cambridge Positioning Systems Limited


UK



100



100CSR Technology Holdings Inc.


USA



100



100CSR (Shanghai) Co. Limited


China



100



100CSR KK


Japan



100



100CSR Korea Limited


South Korea



100



100Cambridge Silicon Radio Sarl


France



100



100CSR (India) Private Limited


India



100



100CSR (Shenzhen) Co. Limited


China



100



100UbiNetics (Cayman Islands) Ltd


Cayman Islands



100



100UbiNetics (Hong Kong) Limited


Hong Kong



100



100UbiNetics (IP) Limited


UK



100



100CSR Technology Inc.


USA



100



100SiRF Technology Inc.


USA



100



100Enuvis Inc


USA



100



100Truespan Inc


USA



100



100CSR Technology Holdings China LLC


China



100



100Shanghai SiRF Technology Co Ltd


China



100



100CSR Technology (Cayman) Limited


Cayman Islands



100



100CSR Technology Singapore Pte Ltd


Singapore



100



100Cambridge Silicon Radio International LLC


USA



100



100CSR Technology (Germany) GmbH (formerly SiRF Technology GmbH)


Germany



100



100CSR Technology (India) Pvt Ltd (formerly SiRF Technology (India) Pvt Ltd)


India



100



100Centrality Limited


Cayman Islands



100



100SiRF Technology Korea LLC


Korea



100



100Zoran Microelectronics Ltd


Israel



100



100Zoran International, Inc.


USA



100



100Zoran Korea Ltd


South Korea



100



100Zoran Digital Technologies (Shenzen) Limited


China



100



100HMTF Acquisition (Bermuda) Ltd


Bermuda



100



100Auvitek International Ltd


Cayman Islands



100



100Zoran Asia Pacific Limited


Hong Kong



100



100Zoran (France) S.A.


France



100



100Zoran (Sweden) AB


Sweden



100



100Oak Technology LLC


USA



100



100Microtune Shanghai, Ltd


China



100



100Transilica Singapore Pte Ltd


Singapore



100



100Microtune (Hong Kong) Limited


Hong Kong



100



100Microtune (Taiwan) Ltd


Taiwan



100



100Zoran (UK) Limited


UK



100



100Zoran Taiwan Corporation


Taiwan



100



100Zoran Japan Corporation


Japan



100



100Zoran Technology GmbH


Germany



100



100Zoran GmbH


Germany



100



100
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report of Loral Space &Communications Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Bernard L. Schwartz, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.     /s/ BERNARD L. SCHWARTZ       *Bernard L. Schwartz* *Chief Executive Officer*March 14, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Bobby Yazdani, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Saba Software, Inc. (the
Company) hereby certify, as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: April 14, 2006



By:

/s/ Bobby YazdaniBobby YazdaniChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D C. 20460 

JUL 5 - 2011 .)FFICE OF 

AIR A D RAO,A-'ON 

Mr. Paul Bailey 

Senior Vice President 

Federal Affairs and Policy 

American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity 

601 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

Dear Mr. Bailey: 

Thank you for your letter of June 7, 20 II, requesting an extension of the public comment period for the 

proposed "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) from Coal- and Oilfired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units and Standards of Performance for Fossil-Fuel-Fired 

Electric Utility, Industrial-Commercial-Institutional, and Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional 

Steam Generating Units" (the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards rule), which was published in the 

Federal Register on May 3,2011. The proposal identified a public comment period of 60 days; that 

period would have ended on July 5, 2011. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, however, 

recently announced an extension of the comment period by 30 days to August 4. 

While we are extending the comment period, we are not seeking to extend the 

November 16, 20 II, deadline for signature of the final rule, and remain committed to meeting that 

deadline. 

The 30-day extension will provide the public with a 140-day period to review the proposal. As you 

know, interested parties were aware of the posting on March 16, 2011, of the signed proposal on the 

EPA's website (http://v/ww.epa.gov/ttnlatw/utility/utilitypg.html), along with much of the pertinent 

supporting documentation (including the analyses used in establishing the proposed emission limits and 

the technical support documents). The proposal was published a little over six weeks later, on May 3, 

marking the beginning of the formal public comment period. This will provide the public with 

approximately 140 days to review and provide written comments on the proposed rule and supporting 

documents. It will also provide at least 60 days for other documentation that was not posted on the 

website until after the proposed rule was signed. Due to the substantive issues specific to this 

rulemaking, this comment period is significantly longer than statutorily required. 

Internet Address (URL) • http /lWwwepa gov 


Rec yc led/Recyclable' Pnnted with Vegetable 0 11 8ased Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process ChlonTle Free Recycled Papel 

Again, you your letter. We look Trorn!<l,'n to the timely of your comments. 

j earthy 

Assistant Administrator
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1996 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1996

To prohibit the inclusion of earmarks in the Intelligence Authorization 
                       Act for Fiscal Year 2010.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2009

   Mr. Flake (for himself, Mr. Burton of Indiana, and Mr. McCotter) 
    introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Select 
              Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select)

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the inclusion of earmarks in the Intelligence Authorization 
                       Act for Fiscal Year 2010.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON INCLUSION OF EARMARKS IN THE INTELLIGENCE 
              AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010.

    (a) Prohibition.--No earmarks shall be included in the enactment of 
a bill authorizing intelligence activities for fiscal year 2010.
    (b) Earmark Defined.--In this section, the term ``earmark'' means a 
provision or report language providing, authorizing, or recommending a 
specific amount of discretionary budget authority, credit authority, or 
other spending authority for a contract, loan, loan guarantee, grant, 
loan authority, or other expenditure targeted to a specific State, 
locality, or congressional district, other than through a statutory or 
administrative formula-driven or competitive award process.
                                 <all>
```
|EXHIBIT 32.2
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Belcrest Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                            



|Date: November 9, 2009
|----------------------



|/s/ Andrew C. FrenetteAndrew C. FrenetteChief Financial Officer
|---------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Peter B. Cromwell and others, *Plaintiffs, v.*James W. Wiltsie and others, *Defendants*.

Order affirmed, with costs and dis-

bursements. Opinion by

Gilbert, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
#### § 617.14 Remedial action by recipients.

Where the Director finds that a recipient has discriminated on the basis of age, the recipient shall take any remedial action the Director may require to overcome the effects of the discrimination. If another recipient exercises control over the recipient that has discriminated, the Director may require both recipients to take remedial action.
#### § 126.180 Carriage of passengers.

No passengers as defined by 46 U.S.C. 2101(21)(B) may be carried aboard an OSV except in an emergency.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Applied Graphics Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kenneth Torosian, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

                                                /s/ KENNETH G. TOROSIAN
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                   Kenneth G. Torosian
                                                  Senior Vice President,
                                                 Chief Financial Officer,
                                                      and Treasurer

April 15, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 136.202 Certificate of Inspection phase-in period. ( a ) All owners or managing operators of more than one existing towing vessel required to have a COI by this subchapter must ensure that each existing towing vessel under their ownership or control is issued a valid COI according to the following schedule: ( 1 ) By July 22, 2019, at least 25 percent of the towing vessels must have valid COIs on board;
( 2 ) By July 20, 2020, at least 50 percent of the towing vessels must have valid COIs on board;
( 3 ) By July 19, 2021, at least 75 percent of the towing vessels must have valid COIs on board; and
( 4 ) By July 19, 2022, 100 percent of the towing vessels must have valid COIs on board.
( b ) All owners or managing operators of only one existing towing vessel required to have a COI by this subchapter must ensure the vessel has an onboard, valid COI by July 20, 2020.
( c ) A new towing vessel must obtain a COI before it enters into service.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board). 

# Date and Time: 

The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on April 12, 2007, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056. 

# ADDRESSES:

Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Parts of this meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited space available), and parts will be closed to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are: 

## Open Session 

### A. Approval of Minutes 

    - March 8, 2007 (Open).

### B. New Business—Reports 

    - Auditors' Report on FCS Building Association FY 2006 Financial Statements.

## Closed Session* 

    - FCS Building Association Audit Report.
    - OSMO Quarterly Report.

* Session Closed-Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and (9). 

Dated: April 5, 2007. 

Roland E. Smith, 

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board. 

[FR Doc. 07-1797 Filed 4-6-07; 12:24 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 151.45-6 Maximum amount of cargo. ( a ) Tanks carrying liquids or liquefied gases at ambient temperatures regulated by this subchapter shall be limited in the amount of cargo loaded to that which will avoid the tank being liquid full at 105 °F if insulated, or 115 °F if uninsulated. If specific filling densities are designated in Subpart 151.50 of this part, they shall take precedence over that noted above.
( b ) Refrigerated and semirefrigerated tanks shall be filled so that there is an outage of at least 2 percent of the volume of the tank at the temperature corresponding to the vapor pressure of the cargo at the safety relief valve setting. A reduction in the required outage may be permitted by the Commandant when warranted by special design considerations. Normally, then, the maximum volume to which a tank may be loaded is:
V *L* = 0.98*d* r *V* ÷ *d* *L* where: *V* *L* = Maximum volume to which tank may be loaded. *V* = Volume of tank. *d* r = Density of cargo at the temperature required for a cargo vapor pressure equal to the relief valve setting. *d* *L* = Density of cargo at the loading temperature and pressure.