alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1884 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the participation 

of optometrists in the National Health Service Corps scholarship and 

loan repayment programs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2009 

Mr. GORDON of Tennessee (for himself, Mr. PITTS, Mr. BOUCHER, and Mr. 

OLVER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for 

the participation of optometrists in the National Health 

Service Corps scholarship and loan repayment programs, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Health Serv5 ice Corps Improvement Act of 2009’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

HR 1884 IH 

1 SEC. 2. PARTICIPATION OF OPTOMETRISTS IN NATIONAL 

2 HEALTH SERVICE CORPS. 

3 (1) PRIMARY HEALTH CARE SERVICES.—Sec4 tion 331 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 254d) is amended— 

6 (A) in subsection (a)(3)(D), by striking 

7 ‘‘or mental health,’’ and inserting ‘‘optometry, 

8 or mental health,’’; and 

9 (B) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ‘‘and 

10 physician assistants’’ and inserting ‘‘optom11 etrists, and physician assistants’’. 

12 (2) SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM.—Section 338A of 

13 the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254l) is 

14 amended— 

15 (A) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘and 

16 physician assistants’’ and inserting ‘‘optom17 etrists, and physician assistants’’; and 

18 (B) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ‘‘or 

19 other health profession’’ and inserting ‘‘optom20 etry, or other health profession’’. 

21 (3) LOAN REPAYMENT PROGRAM.— 

22 (A) PARTICIPATION.—Section 338B of the 

23 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254l–1) 

24 is amended— 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

HR 1884 IH 

1 (i) in subsection (a)(1), by striking 

2 ‘‘and physician assistants’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘optometrists, and physician assistants’’; 

4 (ii) in subsection (b)(1)(A), by strik5 ing ‘‘or another health profession’’ and in6 serting ‘‘optometry, or another health pro7 fession’’; and 

8 (iii) in subsections (b)(1)(B) and 

9 (b)(1)(C)(ii), by striking the term ‘‘or 

10 other health profession’’ each place such 

11 term appears and inserting ‘‘optometry, or 

12 other health profession’’. 

13 (B) PERIOD OF OBLIGATED SERVICE.— 

14 Clauses (ii) and (iii) of section 338C(b)(5)(C) 

15 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 

16 254m(b)(5)(C)) are amended by striking the 

17 term ‘‘or other health profession’’ each place 

18 such term appears and inserting ‘‘optometry, or 

19 other health profession’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7977** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
FURMAN JONES, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Lacy H. Thornburg , District Judge. ( 3:03

- cr - 00063

- LHT

- 1 )

Submitted : August 1, 2014 Decided: August 13, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Furman Jones, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se. Robert John Gleason , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Furman Jones, Jr., seeks to appeal his conviction and

sentence. At the time Jones’ judgment of conviction was entered on the docket, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure required a defendant in a criminal case to file his notice of appeal within ten days of the entry of judgm ent. Fed. R. App. P.
4(b)(1)(A) (i) . With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause, the district court may grant an extension of up to thirty days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes , 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985). The district court entered judgment on January 25,
2005

. Jones filed his notice of appeal on December 10, 2013

. Because Jones failed to file a timely notice of appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period, we dism iss the appeal as untimely. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

* We note that the appeal period in a criminal case is not a jurisdictional provision, but, rather, a claim

- processing rule. Bowles v. R ussell , 551 U.S. 205, 209

- 14 (2007); Rice v. Rivera , 617 F.3d 802, 810 (4th Cir. 2010); United States v. Urutyan , 564 F.3d 679, 685 (4th Cir. 2009). Because Jones’ appeal is inordinately late, and its consideration is not in the best interest of judicial economy, we exercise our inherent power to dismiss it. United States v. Mitchell , 518 F.3d 740, 744, 750 (10th Cir. 2008).3 before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
DISMISSED
- 3040
- 3041
- 3042
- 3043
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                       LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS LTD.

          COMPUTATION OF DEFICIENCY OF EARNINGS TO COVER FIXED CHARGES

                  AND RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COVER FIXED CHARGES
                         (in thousands, except ratios)
                                  (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                           ------------------------------------
                                                             1999        1998          1997
                                                           --------    --------    ------------
<S>                                                        <C>         <C>         <C>
Earnings:
  Income (loss) before income taxes, equity in net loss
     of affiliates and minority interest.................  $(62,138)   $(25,628)     $126,982
  Plus fixed charges:
     Interest expense....................................   173,612     111,334        37,871
     Interest component of rent expense(1)...............     9,953       6,600         4,400
  Less capitalized interest..............................    84,315      60,125        22,641
                                                           --------    --------      --------
Earnings available to cover fixed charges................  $ 37,112    $ 32,181      $146,612
                                                           ========    ========      ========
Fixed charges(2).........................................  $229,044    $172,619      $ 78,568
                                                           ========    ========      ========
Deficiency of earnings to cover fixed charges............  $191,932    $140,438
                                                           ========    ========
Ratio of earnings to cover fixed charges.................                                 1.9x
                                                                                     ========
</TABLE>

---------------
(1) The interest component of rent expense is deemed to be approximately 25% of
    total rent expense.

(2) Fixed charges include preferred dividends as adjusted for the Company's
    effective tax rate. The effective tax rate for 1999 excludes the effect of a
    $34 million tax benefit affecting the utilization of Loral CyberStar's
    pre-acquisition loss carryforwards.
---

List of Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries

|Name                           | Jurisdiction     | Business                                            | % of Ownership
|------------------------------ | ---------------- | --------------------------------------------------- | --------------
|                               |                  |                                                     |               
|DLJ Management Corp.           | Canada           | Management, accounting and
      reporting services | 100%          
|                               |                  |                                                     |               
|Orient Petroleum (NZ) Limited  | New Zealand      | Oil and gas exploration                             | 100%          
|                               |                  |                                                     |               
|Orient Petroleum (PNG) Limited | Papua New Guinea | Oil and gas exploration                             | 100%          

---
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

Editorial Note on Subpart 151.50 of Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart 151.50 of part 151 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, and CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996.

§ 151.50-80 Nitric acid (70% or less). ( a ) Tanks, cargo piping, valves, fittings, and flanges (where exposed to the acid) must be lined with nitric acid resistant rubber or fabricated from nitric acid resistant stainless steel. See § 151.15-3(f)(2).
( b ) During cargo transfer, a water hose must be connected to a water supply, ready for immediate use. Any leakage or spillage of acid must be immediately washed down. This requirement can be met by facilities provided from shore.
( c ) Nitric acid contaminated by other chemicals, oils, solvents, etc. may not be transported in bulk without an authorization from the Commandant (CG-ENG).
[CGD 80-001, 46 FR 63280, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4781, Feb. 3, 1983; CGD 88-100, 54 FR 40041, Sept. 29, 1989]
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.1802 Certificates, letters and endorsements: Foreign flag vessels. ( a ) No person may operate on the navigable waters of the United States a foreign flag vessel, whose flag administration issues IMO Certificates, unless the vessel has: ( 1 ) An IMO Certificate issued by the flag administration that is endorsed with the name of the cargo that it is allowed to carry, and, except when entering United States waters to be examined as required by § 154.150, a Certificate of Compliance1 issued by the Coast Guard endorsed under this part with the name of the cargo that it is allowed to carry; or
( 2 ) Special approval under § 154.30.
( b ) No person may operate on the navigable waters of the United States a foreign flag vessel, whose flag administration does not issue IMO Certificates, unless the vessel has: ( 1 ) Except when entering United States waters to be examined as required by § 154.150, a Certificate of Compliance[1] issued by the Coast Guard endorsed under this part with the name of the cargo it is allowed to carry; or
( 2 ) Special approval under § 154.30.
( c ) No person may operate on the navigable waters of the United States a foreign flag vessel unless the vessel has onboard the following plans and information which except for the certificates under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, are in English: ( 1 ) The vessel's Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate and Cargo Ship Safety Equipment Certificate issued under the International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea, 1974.
( 2 ) A description and schematic plan of the arrangement for inerting cargo tanks, hold spaces, and interbarrier spaces.
( 3 ) A description of the cargo tank gauging equipment.
( 4 ) A description and instruction manual for the calibration of the cargo leak detector equipment.
( 5 ) A schematic plan that shows the locations of leak detectors and sampling points.
( 6 ) If the vessel carries methane, a description of the systems for cargo temperature and pressure control. (See §§ 154.703 through 154.709).
[CGD 74-289, 44 FR 26009, May 3, 1979, as amended by CGD 81-052, 50 FR 8735, Mar. 5, 1985; CGD 77-069, 52 FR 31631, Aug. 21, 1987; CGD 90-008, 55 FR 30663, July 26, 1990] Footnotes -
154.1802
[1] Until the Certificate of Compliance form is developed, the Letter of Compliance with a Subchapter O endorsement for the carriage of liquefied gases will serve the purpose of the endorsed Certificate of Compliance.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Equicap, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Peter Wang, the President and
acting Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 C.F.R. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the company.




Date:  September
21, 2010





By:
              /s/ Peter WangPresident





This
Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
C.F.R. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Act 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Zhongchai Machinery, Inc. and will be retained by Zhongchai
Machinery, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.042-4 Inspection. ( a ) Life raft skids covered by this subpart are not subject to inspection at the place of manufacture, but are inspected on the basis of this specification during the annual or other inspection of the vessel upon which they are placed.
( b ) [Reserved]
1 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

 SOUTHERN DIVISION 

TREMAIN VERNON JONES (#412981), 

Plaintiff, 

CASE NO. 4:14-CV-13153 

JUDGE LINDA V. PARKER 

MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANTHONY P. PATTI 

 v. 

LYNN PARRISH, et al., 

Defendants. 

 / 

ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE MOTION 

DEADLINES 

Tremain Vernon Jones (#412981) is currently incarcerated at the MDOC’s 

Ojibway Correctional Facility (OCF) in Marenisco, Michigan. On August 14, 

2014, while incarcerated at Michigan Reformatory (RMI), Plaintiff filed the instant 

lawsuit against fifty-two (52) defendants. Following the Court’s September 25, 

2015 opinion and order (DE 48), only thirteen (13) defendants remain: Parrish, 

Kimball, Ryan, Walker, Bolton, Bradley, McKee, Franks, Schooley, Heyns, 

MDOC, Curtis and Russell. 

This case has been referred for pretrial matters. (DE 14.) Upon 

consideration, the Court imposes the following deadlines: 

4:14-cv-13153-LVP-APP Doc # 51 Filed 10/02/15 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 970
2 

1. DISCOVERY: Discovery may proceed and must be completed on or 

before May 31, 2016. Depositions of any persons who are 

incarcerated may proceed on such terms and conditions as the 

institution shall impose. The Court advises the parties that the 

discovery completion date requires that discovery requests be made 

sufficiently in advance to permit timely response. The Court further 

advises that motions relating to discovery, if any, shall be filed within 

the discovery period unless it is impossible or impracticable to do so.

2. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS: Defendants must file any motion raising 

the defense of qualified immunity on or before March 31, 2016. If 

Defendants do not file a motion raising the defense of qualified 

immunity, the defense may still be raised at trial, but cannot be raised 

by way of a pre-trial motion unless Defendants first demonstrate 

exceptional circumstances. The Court’s granting of a petition for 

recruitment of pro bono counsel for Plaintiff, if ever, or the setting of a 

date for trial or evidentiary hearing, do not constitute exceptional 

circumstances. 

 The parties shall file all other dispositive motions, if any, on or before 

July 31, 2016. The Court expects the parties to conduct any 

4:14-cv-13153-LVP-APP Doc # 51 Filed 10/02/15 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 971
3 

discovery that may be needed to address any potential motion for 

summary judgment within the discovery period set forth above. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: October 2, 2015 s/Anthony P. Patti 

Anthony P. Patti 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing was sent to parties of record on 

October 2, 2015, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail. 

 s/Michael Williams 

 Case Manager for the 

 Honorable Anthony P. Patti 

4:14-cv-13153-LVP-APP Doc # 51 Filed 10/02/15 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 972
Testimony ofDr. Jonathan Arnon July 29, 2014 Docket ID: EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0602
My name is Dr. Jonathan Arnon. I recently retired after a career as a systems engineer for a major defense contractor. Inmy student days, I worked for two ofthe pioneers of climate research, Dr. Suki Manabe atNOAA and Dr. Jim Hansen atNASA.
Today, these scientists are known for theirwarnings ofthe dangers ofclimate change. Who can forget the Bush administration's efforts to silence Dr. Hansen? But when I worked for them, they werejust starting to develop their mathematical models and computer simulations ofEarth's atmosphere. In the 1970s, supercomputers builtby IBM and Amdahl became powerful enough to run these massive simulations, with students like me to program them. Dr. Manabe's equations modeled the atmosphere, the oceans, and the interactions between them at the surface. (That last partwas the most complex.) Dr. Hansen sought the general principles that could explain atmospheric phenomena on every planet, including Earth.

These scientists didn't start theirresearch with preconceived notions or a point ofview to advocate. They ran theirmodels and drew conclusions from the results. I remember one ofDr. Manabe's experiments. He flattened the HimalayaMountains to observe the effect
on monsoons. (Don'ttry that at home.) Afteryears ofstudy, they both concluded that increased carbon dioxide, caused byburning fuels, deforestation, and destruction of aquatic life from pollution, would cause harmful changes to Earth's climate.

The rules we are discussing today won't solvethese problems, butthey are an important step. And they give ourcountry credibility in internationalforums. When we talk to Brazil about deforestation, or China abouttheir pollution that's reaching ourWest Coast, it helps tobe able to say that America's doing its part.

Thank you.
§ 115.630 The Alternative Hull Examination (AHE) Program application. If your vessel meets the eligibility criteria in § 115.625 of this part, you may apply to the AHE Program. You must submit an application at least 90 days before the requested hull examination date to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI) who will oversee the survey. The application must include— ( a ) The proposed time and place for conducting the hull examination;
( b ) The name of the participating diving contractor and underwater remotely operated vehicle (ROV) company which must be accepted by the OCMI under § 115.650;
( c ) The name and qualifications of the third party examiner. This person must be familiar with the inspection procedures and his or her responsibilities under this program. The OCMI has the discretionary authority to accept or deny use of a particular third party examiner using the criteria established in 46 CFR 114.400;
( d ) A signed statement from your vessel's master, chief engineer, or the person in charge describing the vessel's overall condition, level of maintenance, known or suspected damage, underwater body cleanliness (if known), and the anticipated draft of the vessel at the time of the examination;
( e ) Plans or drawings that illustrate the external details of the hull below the sheer strake;
( f ) A detailed plan for conducting the hull examination in accordance with §§ 115.645 and 115.650 of this part, which must address all safety concerns related to the removal of sea valves during the inspection; and
( g ) A preventative maintenance plan for your vessel's hull, its related systems and equipment.
[USCG-2000-6858, 67 FR 21080, Apr. 29, 2002, as amended by USCG-2000-6858, 69 FR 47383, Aug. 5, 2004]
#### § 122.100 General requirement.

A vessel must be operated in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and in such a manner as to afford adequate precaution against hazards that might endanger the vessel and the persons being transported.
Editorial Note on Part 162
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 162.050-3 Definitions. As used in this subpart— *15 ppm separator* means a separator that is designed to remove enough oil from an oil-water mixture to provide a resulting mixture that has an oil concentration of 15 ppm or less.
*Bilge alarm* means an instrument that is designed to measure the oil content of oily mixtures from machinery space bilges and fuel oil tanks that carry ballast and activate an alarm at a set concentration limit and record date, time, alarm status, and operating status of the 15 ppm separator.
*Independent laboratory* means a laboratory that— ( 1 ) Has the equipment and procedures necessary to approve the electrical components described in §§ 162.050-21(b) and 162.050-25(c), or to conduct the test described in § 162.050-37(a); and
( 2 ) Is not owned or controlled by a manufacturer, supplier, or vendor of separators, oil content meters, or bilge alarms.
Oil content meter or meter means a component of the oil discharge monitoring and control system that is designed to measure the oil content of cargo residues from cargo tanks and oily mixtures combined with these residues.
*PPM* means parts per million by volume of oil in water.
*Response time* means the time elapsed between an alteration in the sample being supplied to the bilge alarm and the ppm display showing the correct response.
[USCG-2004-18939, 74 FR 3382, Jan. 16, 2009]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
PowerCerv Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 333-3960) on Form S-8 of PowerCerv Corporation of our report dated January
26, 1998, except with respect to Notes 9(c) and 10(c) which are as of February
25, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of PowerCerv Corporation
and subsidiary as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows and related
schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1997, which report appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K
of PowerCerv Corporation.


/s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Tampa, Florida
March 30, 1998