alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

T.M., A CHILD

,

Petitioner

,

v. Case No. 5D 17

- 3372

S TATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent

. ________________________________/

Opinion filed November 17, 2017

Petition for Belated Appeal A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Robert Wesley, Public Defender

, Orlando, and Stephanie N. Osman, Assistant Public Defender, Or lando, for Petitioner

.
No appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed

with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the

, September 25, 2017

disp ositions and sentence s in C ase N o. 2016

- CJ

- 004393

- A

- O

, in the Circuit Court in

and for Orange County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)( 6 )(D).

PETITION GRANTED

.

COHEN, C.J., PALMER and BERGER, JJ., concur.
August 25, 2016



### JUDGMENT



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF E .J.S. AND A.R.S., CH ILDREN

________________________________ Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the order signed by the court below on May 23, 2016. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of t his appeal be paid by appellant Sara Elizabeth Slaughter

. We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 151.03-27 Gas free.

Free from dangerous concentrations of flammable or toxic gases.
- 1 - 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

SHERYL HUBBELL, 

 Plaintiff, 

 CASE NO. 14-13897 

 v. HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH 

 

FEDEX SMARTPOST, INC., 

 Defendant. 

_____________________________/ 

ORDER PERMITTING DEFENDANT’S 

EXPERT WITNESS AND REOPENING DISCOVERY 

On January 9, 2017, the Court held a pretrial conference. For the 

reasons stated on the record, the trial is adjourned until June 1, 2017. This 

timeline alters the Court’s proportionality analysis in its prior opinion and 

order excluding defendant’s expert witness, Dr. Nitin Paranjpe. (Doc. 46). 

Therefore, for the reasons stated on the record, the Court sets aside its 

prior ruling on Paranjpe’s testimony and will permit him to testify for 

defendant. 

The Court will reopen discovery for the limited purpose of permitting 

plaintiff to depose Paranjpe before April 30, 2017. Plaintiff may also select 

2:14-cv-13897-GCS-MKM Doc # 57 Filed 01/10/17 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1514
- 2 - 

her own expert witness to rebut Paranjpe. Any such witness must be 

named and a report furnished no later than 60 days before the scheduled 

trial date. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: January 10, 2017 

 s/George Caram Steeh 

 GEORGE CARAM STEEH 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on 

January 10, 2017, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. 

s/Marcia Beauchemin 

Deputy Clerk

2:14-cv-13897-GCS-MKM Doc # 57 Filed 01/10/17 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1515
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Foreign Agricultural Service 

# AGENCY:

Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

The Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS), terminated the certification of a petition for trade adjustment assistance (TAA) on December 12, 2006, that was filed by a group of Florida avocado producers. Florida avocado producers are no longer eligible for TAA benefits in fiscal year 2007.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Upon investigation, the Administrator determined that U.S. producer prices for fresh Florida avocados were 39 percent higher than the base five-year average price. Therefore, producer prices were no longer a contributing factor for program eligibility—a requirement for TAA program eligibility and therefore insufficient grounds to re-certify this petition.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jean-Louis Pajot, Coordinator, Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers, FAS, USDA, (202) 720-2916, e-mail:                         *trade.adjustment@fas.usda.gov.*

Dated: January 5, 2007.

W. Kirk Miller,

Acting, Administrator Foreign Agricultural Service.

[FR Doc. 07-148 Filed 1-11-07; 4:17 pm]

BILLING CODE 3410-10-M
Exhibit 10.31


 


Debt Transfer Agreement


 


[Unofficial English Translation]


 


Party A: BRIDGETIME LIMITED (Transferor)


 


Party B: Minfei Bao (Creditor)


 


Party C: UTIME LIMITED (Transferee)


 


Whereas,


 


		1.	As of March 31, 2019, the balance due to Party B from Party A is US$984,000.



 


By consensus
of the Parties, Party A, Party B and Party C agree as follows:


 


		I.	Party C agrees to assume the debt of US$984,000 owed by Party A to Party B without consideration.
Upon the assuming of the debt, Party C shall repay the debt due to Party B.



 


		II.	If Party C breaches this Agreement, it shall be liable for the breach of agreement to Party A.



 


		III.	In the event of disputes or litigation arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the
Parties agree that such dispute shall be first negotiated in an amicable way; if the dispute cannot be settled through such negotiation,
any party may bring a lawsuit in the court where Party A is located.



 


		IV.	This Agreement shall be provided in triplicates, with each party holding one copy and the three
copies are in full force and effect.



 


		V.	This Agreement shall enter into force after all parties
have signed or sealed properly.



 


	Party A:	 	Party B:	 	Party C:
	 	 	 	 	 
	For an on behalf of BRIDGETIME LIMITED	 	/s/ Minfei
    Bao	 	UTime
    Limited (Seal Affixed)
	 	 	 	 	/s/ Minfei
    Bao
	/s/ Weihuang
    Chen	 	 	 	 
	Authorised Signature(s)	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Date:	 	Date:	 	Date: March 31, 2019
EXHIBIT 32.1

                         PROTALIX BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection  with the periodic report of Protalix  BioTherapeutics,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  I, David Aviezer,  President
and Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  hereby  certify  as of the date
hereof,  solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This  Certification  has not been,  and shall not be  deemed,  "filed"  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: March 28, 2007

/s/ David Aviezer
-----------------------------------------------
David Aviezer, Ph.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer
HealthFirst Amalgam Recovery Program

Contact HealthFirst

800.331.1984

As an ADA Member, you deserve the best that dentistry has to offer. Why should your amalgam waste solution be

any different? Introducing HealthFirst's Amalgam Recovery Program, the only solution of its kind in the industry.

Our program offers ADA Members exclusive savings (up to 33% off MSRP) that can't be found anywhere else. But

that's not all. With our program, you also receive: HealthFirst's Amalgam Recovery Program offers ADA Members

a cost-effective, worry-free compliance solution with exclusive, members-only pricing.

A complete recovery solution that meets the ADA's recommended best practices for the responsible handling of

amalgam waste.

Features the Rebec Environmental CatchHG® amalgam separator, the most durable and long-lasting separator

in the industry, with hardware guaranteed to last the lifetime of your practice.

Ensures just one collector recycle per year, and provides wastewater fine indemnification of up to $500. Never

worry about hidden recycling fees or expensive fines again.

Automatic reminders from The OnTraQ® Compliance Manager improve your practice's level of compliance,

ensuring team member participation in proper handling of amalgam waste. You'll also get certificates of

participation, so you'll always have proof of your process.

Chair-side traps and filters uniquely suited to your practice, and ADA Approved amalgam buckets to contain all

of your amalgam waste properly.

Stay compliant, protect the environment, and save money, all at the same time.

Call today, and speak with a HealthFirst Compliance Counselor to get a custom quote for the unique needs of your

Visit Site
practice.

ADA Business Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a ADA Business Resources is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the American Dental Association.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6831

ALKEIM D. HOWARD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

CARL MANIS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:18-cv-01041-TSE-TCB)

Submitted: November 19, 2019 Decided: November 22, 2019

Before WILKINSON and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alkeim D. Howard, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Alkeim D. Howard seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief 

on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists 

would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or 

wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that 

the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Howard has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MARK SHARRARD, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 14-14212 

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL HON. TERRENCE G. BERG 

SECURITY, HON. PATRICIA T. MORRIS 

Defendant. 

 / 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. 15) 

This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris’ July 31, 

2015 Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 15), recommending that Plaintiff’s motion 

for summary judgment (Dkt. 12) be DENIED, that Defendant’s motion for 

summary judgment (Dkt. 14) be GRANTED, and that the Commissioner be 

AFFIRMED. 

The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. 

The law provides that either party may serve and file written objections “[w]ithin 

fourteen days after being served with a copy” of the report and recommendations. 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district court will make a “de novo determination of those 

portions of the report report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to 

which objection is made.” Id. Where, as here, neither party objects to the report, the 

district court is not obligated to independently review the record. See Thomas v. 

Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149–52 (1985). The Court has reviewed and will accept the 

4:14-cv-14212-TGB-PTM Doc # 16 Filed 08/21/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 757
   

2 

Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation of July 31, 2015, as this Court’s findings 

of fact and conlcusions of law. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Patricia T. 

Morris’ Report and Recommendation of July 31, 2015 (Dkt. 15) is ACCEPTED and 

ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment 

(Dkt. 12) is DENIED, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 14) is 

GRANTED, and the findings and conclusions of the Commissioner are 

AFFIRMED. 

SO ORDERED. 

s/Terrence G. Berg 

TERRENCE G. BERG 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: August 21, 2015 

Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that this Order was electronically submitted on August 21, 2015, using the 

CM/ECF system, which will send notification to each party. 

 By: s/A. Chubb 

Case Manager 

4:14-cv-14212-TGB-PTM Doc # 16 Filed 08/21/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 758
Feoegie eH

ovr
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA “and

/ 47 PY "9p

NATIONAL REPUBLICAN
CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 96-2295

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION,

EILED

OCT 23 9%

ORDER CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
PISTRICT OF COLUMEA

In accordance with the proceedings in open court of October

Defendant.

Veer veveve vv vr nr

23, 1996, it is, this Zed aay of October, 1996,

ORDERED, that plaintiff promptly file a motion for partial
summary judgment on the issue of defendant’s unrcoacsenable delay
in determining whether to make a Reason-to-Believe finding with
respect to plaintiff’s complaints in MURS 4307, 4328, and 4338,
in accordance with 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a) (2); and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, that defendant respond to such motion
within the time allowed therefor by D.D.C. Rule 108(b), or such
further time as the Court may allow for cause shown; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, that the Stipulation and Protective order

cf Octeber 17, 1996. shall apply to all materials subject to the

confidentiality provisions of 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a) (22) (A) submitted

in support of and in opposition to said motion; and it is

- er Me
! Ay F



FURTHER ORDERED, that all other proceedings herein,
including plaintiff's motion to expedite discovery and

defendant’s motion for a protective order, are stayed pending

further order of Court.

mas Penfield Jackson
U.S. District Judge
§ 15.1030 New York and New Jersey. The following U.S. navigable waters located within the States of New York and New Jersey when the vessel is making an intra-port transit, to include, but not limited to, a movement from a dock to a dock, from a dock to an anchorage, from an anchorage to a dock, or from an anchorage to an anchorage, within the following listed operating areas: ( a ) East River from Execution Rocks to New York Harbor, Upper Bay;
( b ) Hudson River from Yonkers, New York to New York Harbor, Upper Bay;
( c ) Raritan River from Grossman Dock/Arsenal to New York Harbor, Lower Bay;
( d ) Arthur Kill Channel;
( e ) Kill Van Kull Channel;
( f ) Newark Bay;
( g ) Passaic River from Point No Point to Newark Bay;
( h ) Hackensack River from the turning basin to Newark Bay; and
( i ) New York Harbor, Upper and Lower Bay.
Note to § 15.1030 :
“Intra-port transit” as used in this section includes the movement of a foreign-trade vessel inbound from sea from the point where a State-licensed pilot ceases providing pilotage to another point within the identified areas (*i.e.*, a dock or anchorage). Likewise, intra-port transit also includes the movement of a foreign-trade vessel outbound to sea from a point within the identified areas (*i.e.*, a dock or anchorage) to the point where a State licensed pilot begins providing pilotage.
[CGD 92-061, 60 FR 24796, May 10, 1995, as amended by USCG-2004-18884, 69 FR 58344, Sept. 30, 2004]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Education

###### Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools 

# For Further Information Contact:

                         Dana Carr, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 3E332, Washington, DC 20202-6450. Telephone: (202) 260-0823 or by e-mail:                         *dana.carr@ed.gov.*

If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339. 

Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on request to the program contact person listed in this section. 

## VIII. Other Information 

*Electronic Access to This Document:*                         You may view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the                         **Federal Register**                        , in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site:                         *www.ed.gov/​news/​fedregister*

To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530. 

# Note:

                            The official version of this document is the document published in the                             **Federal Register**                            . Free Internet access to the official edition of the                             **Federal Register**                             and the Code of Federal Regulations is available on GPO Access at:                             *http://www.gpoaccess.gov/​nara/​index.html*.                         

Dated: March 21, 2007. 

Deborah A. Price, 

Assistant Deputy Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools. 

[FR Doc. 07-1465 Filed 3-23-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 21st Century
Holding Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Widdicombe,
Chief Executive Officer of 21st Century Holding Company, hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         21st Century Holding Company.


By:  /s/ Richard A. Widdicombe
----------------------------------------------
Richard A. Widdicombe, Chief Executive Officer
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2153 

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to increase the extent 

to which State law is used in determining whether a criminal conviction 

under State law is sufficient to deny a person the right to ship, transport, 

possess, or receive a firearm. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 28, 2009 

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to 

increase the extent to which State law is used in determining whether a criminal conviction under State law 

is sufficient to deny a person the right to ship, transport, 

possess, or receive a firearm. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Second Amendment 

5 Restoration Act’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2153 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITED RESTORATION OF FIREARMS RIGHTS 

2 UNDER STATE LAW. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 921(a)(20) of title 18, 

4 United States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

5 ‘‘(20) The term ‘‘crime punishable by imprisonment 

6 for a term exceeding one year’’ does not include— 

7 ‘‘(A) any Federal or State offenses pertaining 

8 to antitrust violations, unfair trade practices, re9 straints of trade, or other similar offenses relating 

10 to the regulation of business practices; or 

11 ‘‘(B) any State offense classified by the laws of 

12 the State as a misdemeanor and punishable by a 

13 term of imprisonment of 2 years or less, or by an 

14 indeterminate sentence. 

15 What constitutes a conviction of such a crime shall be de16 termined in accordance with the law of the jurisdiction in 

17 which the proceedings were held. Any conviction which has 

18 been expunged or set aside, or for which a person has been 

19 pardoned, has had civil rights restored, or has not lost 

20 civil rights, shall not be considered a conviction for pur21 poses of this chapter, except to the extent that the pardon, 

22 expungement, or restoration of civil rights, or State or 

23 Federal law, expressly provides that the person may not 

24 ship, transport, possess, or receive any firearm.’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2153 IH

1 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub2 section (a) shall apply to proceedings brought or pending 

3 before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS