alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008130EN.01000901.xml

| 28.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/9

---

Ex post publicity of Eurostat grants in 2007

Ex post

(2008/C 130/04)

In accordance with Article 110(2) of the Financial Regulation and Article 169 of its implementing rules, the public is hereby informed of the actions subsidised by Eurostat in the year 2007.

The electronic file showing the actions concerned can be found in list form on the EUROPA server (http://europa.eu.int). You can access this list via ‘Services’, ‘Grants’, ‘Statistics’, ‘Eurostat Grants’ and the file ‘List of grants awarded in 2007’.

List of grants awarded in 2007

The list gives the file number, the unit concerned, the name and country of the beneficiaries, the title of the action, the amount of the grant and the rate of Community co-financing for the action.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

AHMED NAGI, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

JOHN F. KERRY, 

 Defendant. 

/ 

CIVIL NO. 2:14cv13948 

HON. AVERN COHN 

MAG. JUDGE DAVID R. GRAND 

STIPULATED ORDER DISMISSING CASE

On January 26, 2015, the U.S. Department of State issued a passport to Plaintiff 

Ahmed Nagi. Plaintiff and Defendant (“the Parties”) agree that issuance of the passport 

renders this case moot. Accordingly, the Parties, by and through their undersigned 

attorneys, jointly stipulate and agree, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

41(a)(1)(A)(ii), to dismissal of this action with prejudice. The Parties agree to bear their 

own costs and fees. 

SO ORDERED. 

 

 s/Avern Cohn 

 AVERN COHN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: January 22, 2015 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of 

record on this date, January 22, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. 

 s/Sakne Chami 

 Case Manager, 313-234-5160 

2:14-cv-13948-AC-DRG Doc # 10 Filed 01/27/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 39
2 

Dated: January 27, 2015 Respectfully submitted, 

COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC 

RELATIONS, MICHIGAN 

/s/ Lena Masri (by CAD with consent via 

email on 01/27/15) 

LENA F. MASRI (P73461) 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

21700 Northwestern Hwy, Ste. 815 

Southfield, MI 48075 

Phone: (248) 559-2247 

lmasri@cair.com 

JOYCE R. BRANDA 

Acting Assistant Attorney General 

WILLIAM C. PEACHEY 

Director

s/ Craig A. Defoe 

CRAIG A. DEFOE 

Indiana Bar No. 2707849 

Trial Attorney 

United States Department of Justice 

Office of Immigration Litigation 

District Court Section 

P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station 

Washington, D.C. 20044 

(202) 532-4114 

(202) 305-7000 (fax) 

craig.defoe@usdoj.gov 

Attorneys for Defendant 

2:14-cv-13948-AC-DRG Doc # 10 Filed 01/27/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 40
21st Century
Holding Company





EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-


OXLEY
ACT





In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of 21st Century
Holding Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Peter J. Prygelski, III, Chief
Financial Officer of 21st Century
Holding Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 21st
      Century Holding Company.





By:  /s/ Peter J. Prygelski,
      IIIPeter
      J. Prygelski, III, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
      Officer)
              August
      16, 2010
§ 16.220 Periodic testing requirements. ( a ) Except as provided by paragraph (c) of this section and § 10.227(g) of this chapter, an applicant must pass a chemical test for dangerous drugs for— ( 1 ) An original issuance of a license, COR, MMD, or MMC;
( 2 ) The first issuance, raise of grade, or renewal of an officer endorsement on a merchant mariner credential;
( 3 ) A raise of grade of a license or COR;
( 4 ) The first endorsement as an able seaman, lifeboatman, qualified member of the engine department, or tankerman; or
( 5 ) A reissuance of a credential with a new expiration date. The applicant must provide the results of the test to the Coast Guard Regional Examination Center (REC) at the time of submitting an application. The test results must be completed and dated not more than 185 days before submission of the application.
( b ) Unless excepted under paragraph (c) of this section, each pilot required by this subchapter to receive an annual physical examination must pass a chemical test for dangerous drugs as a part of that examination, and provide the results to the Coast Guard. Applicants need not submit additional copies of their annual chemical test for dangerous drugs pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section if the applicant submitted passing results of a chemical test for dangerous drugs to the Coast Guard within 12 months of the date of application.
( c ) An applicant need not submit evidence of passing a chemical test for dangerous drugs required by paragraph (a) or (b) of this section if he or she provides satisfactory evidence that he or she has— ( 1 ) Passed a chemical test for dangerous drugs required by this part within the previous six months with no subsequent positive chemical tests during the remainder of the 6-month period; or
( 2 ) During the previous 185 days been subject to a random testing program required by § 16.230 for at least 60 days and did not fail or refuse to participate in a chemical test for dangerous drugs required by this part.
( d ) Except as provided by paragraph (b) of this section, an applicant is required to provide the results of only one chemical test for dangerous drugs when multiple transactions are covered by or requested in a single application.
[CGD 91-223, 60 FR 4525, Jan. 23, 1995, as amended by USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11264, Mar. 16, 2009; USCG-2018-0874, 84 FR 30883, June 28, 2019]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 51 (Friday, March 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 12612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1324]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

Date & Time: Thursday, March 22, 2007, at 10 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (ninth floor).

Status: This meeting will be open to the public.

Items to be discussed: 
    Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Advisory Opinion 2007-01: Senator Claire McCaskill and McCaskill 
for Auditor by counsel, Marc E. Elias and Caroline P. Goodson.
    Draft Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Standards of Conduct.
    Draft Final Rules on Best Efforts in Administrative Fines 
Challenges.
    Policy Regarding Self-Reporting of Campaign Finance Violations (Sua 
Sponte Submissions).
    Bush/Cheney '04 Audit.
    Clark for President, Inc.
    Policy Statement Regarding Internal Controls.
    Management and Administrative Matters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-1324 Filed 3-14-07; 2:42 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2014 (the "Form 10-Q") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").



I, Tracey A. Welsh, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer of the Issuer, certify that to my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 15, 2014



| | /s/ Tracey A. Welsh                                          | 
| | ------------------------------------------------------------ | 
| | Tracey A. Welsh                                              | 
| | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Theodore A. Boutacoff,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of IRIDEX Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2011 (i) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of IRIDEX Corporation.

Date: March 24, 2011



By:

/s/    THEODORE A.
BOUTACOFFName:

Theodore A. BoutacoffTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
-1- 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case No. 14-cr-30542-1 

Honorable Gershwin A. Drain 

v. 

 

CLIRIM MUHADRI, 

 Defendant. 

 / 

STIPULATION TO ALLOW INTERPRETER TO ACCOMPANY 

ATTORNEY TO VISIT DEFENDANT 

Upon the reading and filing of the attached Stipulation, and the Court being fully advised 

in the premises; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Wayne County Sheriff Department allow Akim 

Perovic, or any interpreter from Pallero Translations, to accompany Attorney ALVIN C. 

SALLEN for any and all jail visits with his client CLIRIM MUHADRI 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: November 10, 2014 

 /s/Gershwin A Drain 

 Hon. Gershwin A. Drain 

 United States District Court Judge 

 

2:14-cr-20692-GAD-DRG Doc # 9 Filed 11/10/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 20
-2- 

2:14-cr-20692-GAD-DRG Doc # 9 Filed 11/10/14 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 21
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 31

                    Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification

I, Michael P. Muldowney, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nextera Enterprises,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosures
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

 Date: November 5, 2004

                                        By: /s/ Michael P. Muldowney
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        President and Chief Financial Officer
                                        (Principal Executive Officer and
                                        Principal Financial Officer)

                                       21
#### MABEL KOSTURKO ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. JAMES ANTON WISSE, DEFENDANT.

Submitted May term, 1929

Decided October 21, 1929.

Before Gummeee, Chief Justice, and Justices Kalisch and Campbell.

Eor the rule, *Peter J. McGinnis.*

*Oontra, Jacob Schneider.*

Pee Cueiam.

This was an action seeking to recover damages alleged to have been caused by the negligent operation of a motor car by the defendant. The trial of the issue resulted in a verdict in favor of the defendant below.

By the present rule the plaintiffs seek to have such finding against them set aside for the reason, as urged, that it is against the weight of the evidence.

We conclude that the proofs presented such a question as not to warrant the setting aside of the settlement thereof and finding thereon by the jury.

The rule is therefore discharged.
Exhibit 32.1

Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George G. Andrews, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ George G. AndrewsGeorge G. Andrews, Chief Executive Officer and Director


August 16, 2010
§ 115.804 Machinery. At each initial and subsequent inspection for certification of a vessel, the owner or managing operator shall be prepared to conduct tests and have the vessel ready for inspections of machinery, fuel, and piping systems, including the following: ( a ) Operation of the main propulsion machinery both ahead and astern;
( b ) Operational test and inspection of engine control mechanisms including primary and alternate means of starting machinery;
( c ) Inspection of all machinery essential to the routine operation of the vessel including generators and cooling systems;
( d ) External inspection of fuel tanks and inspection of tank vents, piping, and pipe fittings;
( e ) Inspection of all fuel systems;
( f ) Operational test of all valves in fuel lines by operating locally and at remote operating positions;
( g ) Operational test of all overboard discharge and intake valves and watertight bulkhead pipe penetration valves;
( h ) Operational test of the means provided for pumping bilges; and
( i ) Test of machinery alarms including bilge high level alarms.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2229 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2229

 To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to allow 
  States to adopt alternate and modified standards for students with 
                             disabilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 2009

 Mr. Boozman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to allow 
  States to adopt alternate and modified standards for students with 
                             disabilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALLOWING STATES TO ADOPT ALTERNATE AND MODIFIED STANDARDS 
              FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES.

    Section 1111(b)(1) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
1965 (20 U.S.C. 6311(b)(1)) is amended by striking subparagraph (B) and 
inserting the following:
                    ``(B) Same standards.--
                            ``(i) In general.--The academic standards 
                        required by subparagraph (A) shall be the same 
                        academic standards that the State applies to 
                        all schools and children in the State, except 
                        as provided in clause (ii).
                            ``(ii) Students with disabilities.--The 
                        State may apply alternate and modified academic 
                        standards to students with disabilities who, 
                        consistent with the student's individualized 
                        education program, and based on the student's 
                        disability and level of performance, should be 
                        provided opportunities to achieve grade-level 
                        proficiency beyond a given school year. The 
                        alternate and modified academic standards shall 
                        reflect ambitious annual goals for attainment 
                        by the students with disabilities.''.
                                 <all>
```
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-630.2 

________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT 

Article 98 

 Agreement between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MAURITIUS 

Signed at Washington June 25, 2003 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
MAURITIUS 

International Criminal Court: Article 98 

Agreement signed at Washington June 25, 2003; 

 Entered into force June 30, 2003.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.058-3 Materials, workmanship, construction and performance requirements. ( a ) The materials, construction, workmanship, general and detail requirements shall conform to the requirements of the specification listed in § 160.058-1(a)(1), except as otherwise specifically provided by this subpart.
( b ) [Reserved]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Automotive Body Parts

Association,

Plaintiff(s),

v. Case No. 2:15−cv−10137−LJM−MJH

Hon. Laurie J. Michelson

Ford Global Technologies, LLC,

Defendant(s),

ORDER OF REFERENCE TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

IT IS ORDERED that this matter is referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3), for the following purpose(s):

• Conduct settlement conference

 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Companion Case: 15−10394 Referred As Well.

s/Laurie J. Michelson 

Laurie J. Michelson

United States District Judge

Certificate of Service

 I hereby certify that on this date a copy of the foregoing notice was served upon the parties

and/or counsel of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail.

s/K Jackson 

Case Manager

Dated: October 14, 2016

2:15-cv-10137-LJM-SDD Doc # 37 Filed 10/14/16 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 555
#### Nancy E. Bradley, *Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v.*Nelson A. Mirick, Appellant.

Motion for reargument denied. (See 81 N. Y., 260 ; 27 id., 9; 22 Wend., 526.)