alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 11.705 Route familiarization requirements. ( a ) The Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI) has jurisdiction and determines within the range limitations specified in this section, the number of roundtrips required to qualify an applicant for a particular route, considering the following: ( 1 ) The geographic configuration of the waterway.
( 2 ) The type and size of vessels using the waterway.
( 3 ) The abundance or absence of aids to navigation.
( 4 ) The background lighting effects.
( 5 ) The known hazards involved, including waterway obstructions or constrictions such as bridges, narrow channels, or sharp turns.
( 6 ) Any other factors unique to the route that the OCMI deems appropriate.
( b ) An applicant holding no other deck officer endorsement seeking an endorsement as first-class pilot must furnish evidence of having completed a minimum number of roundtrips, while serving as quartermaster, wheelsman, able seaman, apprentice pilot, or in an equivalent capacity, standing regular watches at the wheel or in the pilot house as part of routine duties, over the route sought. Evidence of having completed a minimum number of roundtrips while serving as an observer, properly certified by the master and/or pilot of the vessel, is also acceptable. The range of roundtrips for an endorsement is a minimum of 12 roundtrips and a maximum of 20 roundtrips. An applicant may have additional routes added to the first-class pilot endorsement by meeting the requirements in paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) An applicant who currently holds a deck officer license or MMC endorsement seeking an endorsement as first-class pilot for a particular route must furnish evidence of having completed the number of roundtrips over the route, specified by the OCMI, within the range limitations of this paragraph, for the particular grade of existing license or MMC endorsement held. The range of roundtrips for an endorsement is a minimum of eight roundtrips and a maximum of 15 roundtrips.
( d ) Unless determined impracticable by the OCMI, 25 percent of the roundtrips required by the OCMI under this section must be made during the hours of darkness.
( e ) One of the roundtrips required by the OCMI under this section must be made over the route within the 6 months immediately preceding the date of application.
[USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 77909, Dec. 24, 2013, as amended by USCG-2004-17914, 79 FR 55657, Sept. 17, 2014]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William W. Harrod, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|DATE: August 13, 2007 |  |  |  | BY: |  | /s/ William W. Harrod                
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | William W. Harrod                    
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*Thomas Gilmore, v. James Callahan, *Justice,*etc.

Motion for reargument denied.
#### § 112.55-5 Emergency lighting loads.

When supplying emergency lighting loads, the storage battery initial voltage must not exceed the standard system voltage by more than 5 percent.
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.437 General.

An independent tank type A must meet § 154.438 through § 154.440.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

PARRISH REDD,

Plaintiff, Case No. 14-14340

Hon. Marianne O. Battani

v.

 

TERRANCE VAILS, et al., 

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S THIRD EMERGENCY MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Plaintiff filed a pro se complaint alleging copyright infringement in November

2014. The Court referred the case to United States Magistrate Judge R. Steven

Whalen for all pretrial proceedings. On April 13, 2015, Magistrate Judge Whalen issued

a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s

Third Emergency Motion for Default Judgment as to Chris Hugan and Marty Peters.

 In his Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge informed the parties

that objections to the R&R needed to be filed “within fourteen (14) days of service” and

that a party’s failure to file objections would waive any further right of appeal. (Doc. No.

55 at 3). No objection has been filed. 

The Court agree with the analysis and recommendation contained in the R&R. In

light of the fact that Hugan and Peters have timely answered the complaint; the Court

ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation and DENIES Plaintiff’s motion.

2:14-cv-14340-MOB-RSW Doc # 66 Filed 06/11/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 417
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: June 11, 2015 s/Marianne O. Battani 

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's ECF System to their

respective email addresses or First Class U.S. mail to the non-ECF participants on June 11, 2015.

s/ Kay Doaks 

Case Manager

2

2:14-cv-14340-MOB-RSW Doc # 66 Filed 06/11/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 418
# C_2016048EN.01003601.xml

| 8.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2015 — Deutsche Lufthansa and Others v Commission

(Case T-46/11) (1)

1

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European airfreight market - Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of the pricing of airfreight services (imposition of fuel and security surcharges, refusal to pay commission on surcharges) - Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and Switzerland on Air Transport - Obligation to state reasons))

(2016/C 048/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Deutsche Lufthansa AG (Cologne, Germany); Lufthansa Cargo AG (Frankfurt am Main, Germany); and Swiss International Air Lines AG (Basel, Switzerland) (represented initially by S. Völcker, F. Louis, E. Arsenidou and A. Israel, and subsequently by S. Völcker and J. Orogolas, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by M. Kellerbauer, S. Noë and N. von Lingen, and subsequently by S. Noë and A. Dawes, acting as Agents, and by J. Anderson, Barrister)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Articles 1 to 4 of Commission Decision C(2010) 7694 final of 9 November 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport (Case COMP/39258 — Airfreight).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Articles 1 to 4 of Commission Decision C(2010) 7694 final of 9 November 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport (Case COMP/39258 — Airfreight), in so far as they concern Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Lufthansa Cargo AG and Swiss International Air Lines AG; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Articles 1 to 4 of Commission Decision C(2010) 7694 final of 9 November 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport (Case COMP/39258 — Airfreight), in so far as they concern Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Lufthansa Cargo AG and Swiss International Air Lines AG;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those of Deutsche Lufthansa, Lufthansa Cargo and Swiss International Air Lines. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those of Deutsche Lufthansa, Lufthansa Cargo and Swiss International Air Lines.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 12.3.2011.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.540 Quick-closing shut-off valves: Emergency shut-down system. The quick-closing shut-off valves under §§ 154.530, 154.532, and 154.538 must have an emergency shut-down system that: ( a ) Closes all the valves;
( b ) Is actuated by a single control in at least two locations remote from the quick-closing valves;
( c ) Is actuated by a single control in each cargo control station under § 154.320; and
( d ) Has fusible elements at each tank dome and cargo loading and discharge manifold that melt between 98 °C (208 °F) and 104 °C (220 °F) and actuate the emergency shut-down system.
§ 108.447 Piping. ( a ) Each pipe, valve, and fitting in a CO2 system must have a bursting pressure of at least 420 kilograms per square centimeter (6,000 pounds per square inch).
( b ) All piping for a CO2 system of nominal size of 19.05 millimeters (3 ⁄ 4 inch) inside diameter or less must be at least Schedule 40 (standard weight) and all piping of nominal size over 19.05 millimeters (3 ⁄ 4 inch) inside diameter must be at least Schedule 80 (extra heavy).
( c ) Each pipe, valve, and fitting made of ferrous materials in a CO2 system must be protected inside and outside from corrosion.
( d ) Each CO2 system must have a pressure relief valve set to relieve between 168 and 196 kilograms per square centimeter (2,400 and 2,800 pounds per square inch) in the distribution manifold or other location that protects the piping when all branch line shut off valves are closed.
( e ) The end of each branch line in a CO2 system must extend at least 50 millimeters (2 inches) beyond the last discharge outlet and be closed with a cap or plug.
( f ) Piping, valves, and fittings in a CO2 system must be securely supported and protected from damage.
( g ) Each CO2 system must have drains and dirt traps located where dirt or moisture can accumulate in the system.
( h ) Discharge piping in a CO2 system may not be used for any other purpose except as part of a fire detection system.
( i ) Piping in a CO2 system that passes through accommodation spaces must not have drains or other openings within these spaces.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          13,430
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     18,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,900
<PP&E>                                           9,838
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,784
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,887
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,361
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,248
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,514,967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             100,776
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,045,877)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,712,010)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,712,010)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.69)
                                             

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.028-3 Materials, workmanship, construction, and performance requirements. ( a ) *Materials.* The materials used in signal pistols shall conform strictly to the specifications and drawings submitted by the manufacturer and approved by the Commandant. In general, all parts shall be corrosion-resistant or properly protected against corrosion. The ejection mechanism shall be of material possessing excellent wearing qualities.
( b ) *Workmanship.* Signal pistols shall be of first class workmanship and shall be free from imperfections of manufacture affecting their serviceability or appearance.
( c ) *Construction and performance requirements. (Pistols intended for signals meeting Subpart 160.024).* Signal pistols shall be of rugged construction and shall operate satisfactorily in firing and ejecting pistol-projected parachute red flare distress signals of the type covered by Subpart 160.024. The ejection mechanism shall be of sturdy design capable of withstanding rough and repeated usage. The overall size and weight of signal pistols should be kept to a minimum consistent with adequate strength and safety. When the pistol is cocked and the trigger is pulled, the firing pin shall project between 1.52 mm and 2.54 mm (0.060 in. and 0.100 in.) beyond the face plate of the frame. When the barrel is locked in the firing position, the barrel chamber shall be not more than 0.25 mm (0.010 in.) from the face plate of the frame.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.42


May 8, 2002

Pulitzer Inc.
900 North Tucker Blvd.
St. Louis, MO  63101

Dear Sirs/Madams:

At your request, we have read the description included in your Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended
March 31, 2002, of the facts relating to the Company's change in its newsprint
inventory valuation practice from the last-in, first-out method to the first-in,
first-out method. We believe, on the basis of the facts so set forth and other
information furnished to us by appropriate officials of the Company, that the
accounting change described in your Form 10-Q is to an alternative accounting
principle that is preferable under the circumstances.

We have not audited any consolidated financial statements of Pulitzer Inc. and
its consolidated subsidiaries as of any date or for any period subsequent to
December 30, 2001. Therefore, we are unable to express, and we do not express,
an opinion on the facts set forth in the above-mentioned Form 10-Q on the
related information furnished to us by officials of the Company, or on the
financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of Pulitzer Inc. and
its consolidated subsidiaries as of any date or for any period subsequent to
December 30, 2001.

Yours truly,


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
#### § 169.535 Required equipment for lifefloats.

Each lifefloat must be equipped in accordance with Table [169.535](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-169.535). The equipment is described in [§ 169.537](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-169.537).

Table [169.535](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-169.535)

| Letter identification and Item | Number required for each lifefloat | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Exposed and partially protected water | Protected water |
| (a) Boathook | 1 | 1 |
| (b) Lifeline | 1 | 1 |
| (c) Paddles | 4 | 4 |
| (d) Painter | 1 | 1 |
| (e) Water light | 1 | None |
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERALRESERVE SYSTEM

 Date: March 22, 2006 

 To: Board of Governors 

 From: Governor Olson 

Subject: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Implementing New Risk-Based Capital Framework 

in the United States 

 Attached are a memorandum and a draft UFederalU URegisterU notice that present a notice of 

proposed rulemaking (NPR) implementing a new risk-based capital adequacy framework based 

on the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s 2005 revised capital accord. The NPR would 

be published jointly by the four federal banking agencies in the UFederalU URegisterU after all of the 

agencies have completed their internal review and approval procedures, including for the OCC 

and the OTS, review by the Office of Management and Budget. 

The Committee on Supervisory and Regulatory Affairs has reviewed the proposal and I 

believe it is ready for the Board’s consideration at an open Board meeting on March 30. If the 

Board approves the NPR on March 30, a draft would be posted on the Board’s website, allowing 

public access to the document pending the completion of the agencies’ review processes. 

Attachment 

Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<CIK>                         0001070543
<NAME>                        WILLOW GROVE BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,036
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           9,359
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     82,702
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        345,131
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,990
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 452,929
<DEPOSITS>                                     375,448
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,237
<LONG-TERM>                                     10,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,501
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 452,929
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 20,221
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,208
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                23,429
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,472
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,063
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,366
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      351
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,888
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,921
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,505
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,505
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.60
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,343
<LOANS-PAST>                                         5
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,348
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,665
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       26
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,990
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,990
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            799
        


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.174-23 Marking. ( a ) Each thermal protective aid must be marked with the words “Thermal Protective Aid,” the name of the manufacturer, the model, the date of manufacture or a lot number from which the date of manufacture may be determined, and the Coast Guard approval number.
( b ) Each storage case must be marked with the words “Thermal Protective Aid” or the thermal protective aid must have a similar marking which is visible through a transparent storage case.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofArtificial Life, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank Namyslik, chief financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company.

 

Date: August 5, 2010

 

/s/ Frank Namyslik  

Frank Namyslik

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

27

 

----
§ 690.120 Evaluation and disposition of applications and proposals for research to be conducted or supported by a Federal department or agency. ( a ) The department or agency head will evaluate all applications and proposals involving human subjects submitted to the Federal department or agency through such officers and employees of the Federal department or agency and such experts and consultants as the department or agency head determines to be appropriate. This evaluation will take into consideration the risks to the subjects, the adequacy of protection against these risks, the potential benefits of the research to the subjects and others, and the importance of the knowledge gained or to be gained.
( b ) On the basis of this evaluation, the department or agency head may approve or disapprove the application or proposal, or enter into negotiations to develop an approvable one.