alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2094 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to increase the per resident 

payment floor for direct graduate medical education payments under 

the Medicare Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2009 

Mr. PASCRELL (for himself, Mr. MORAN of Kansas, and Mr. YOUNG of Alaska) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to increase 

the per resident payment floor for direct graduate medical education payments under the Medicare Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Physician Training 

5 Promotion Act of 2009’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2094 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASING TO 100 PERCENT OF THE LOCALITY 

2 ADJUSTED NATIONAL AVERAGE PER RESI3 DENT AMOUNT THE PAYMENT FLOOR FOR DI4 RECT GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION PAY5 MENTS UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM. 

6 Section 1886(h)(2)(D)(iii) of the Social Security Act 

7 (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(h)(2)(D)(iii)) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘70 percent,’’; and 

9 (2) by inserting after ‘‘85 percent,’’ the fol10 lowing: ‘‘for the cost reporting period beginning dur11 ing fiscal year 2009 shall not be less than 90 per12 cent, for the cost reporting period beginning during 

13 fiscal year 2010 shall not be less than 95 percent, 

14 and for the cost reporting period beginning during 

15 fiscal year 2011 shall not be less than 100 percent,’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 22 (Thursday, February 2, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 5649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-959]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Software Assurance 
will meet in closed session on February 23 and 24, 2006; at Science 
Applications International Corporation (SAIC), 4001 N. Fairfax Drive, 
Arlington, VA. This meeting is to chart the direction of the study and 
begin assessing the current capabilities and vulnerabilities of DoD 
software.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they 
affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these 
meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will: Assess the risk 
that DoD runs as a result of foreign influence on its software and to 
suggest technology and other measures to mitigate the risk.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been 
determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern 
matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, the 
meetings will be closed to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LCDR Clifton Phillips, USN, Defense 
Science Board, 3140 Defense Pentagon, Room 3C553, Washington, DC 20301-
3140, via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="680b04010e1c070646180001040401181b28071b0c46050104">[email protected]</a>, or via phone at (703) 
571-0083.

    Dated: January 27, 2006.
Linda Bynum,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 06-959 Filed 2-1-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of San West, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2009, I, Bryan Britton, Chief Financial Officer of San West, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.

Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of San West, Inc.

Dated: November 12, 2009.

/s/ Bryan Britton

Bryan Britton, Chief Financial Officer of
    San West, Inc.
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION



In connection with this quarterly report of Saba Software,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2003 (the Report), I, Geno Tolari, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and
for the periods indicated.
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: April 14, 2003



By:

/s/    GENO P. TOLARIGeno Tolari Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Bobby Yazdani, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Saba Software, Inc. (the Company) hereby certify, as of the date hereof, solely for
purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2003 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                     |  |     |  |                            
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: April 14, 2004 |  |     |  |                            
|                     |  | By: |  | /s/ Bobby Yazdani          
|                     |  |     |  | Bobby Yazdani              
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer and
|                     |  |     |  | Chairman of the Board
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.801 Pressure relief systems. ( a ) Each cargo tank that has a volume of 20m3 (706 ft.3) or less must have at least one pressure relief valve.
( b ) Each cargo tank that has a volume of more than 20m3 (706 ft.3) must have at least two pressure relief valves of the same nominal relieving capacity.
( c ) Each pressure relief valve must: ( 1 ) Meet Subpart 162.018 of this chapter or, if the valve is also capable of vacuum relief and the MARVS is 69 kPa gauge (10 psig) or less, Subpart 162.017 of this chapter, and have at least the capacity required under § 154.806;
( 2 ) Not be set for a higher pressure than the MARVS;
( 3 ) Have a fitting for sealing wire that prevents the set pressure from being changed without breaking the sealing wire;
( 4 ) Be fitted on the cargo tank to remain in the vapor phase under conditions of 15° list and of 0.015 L trim by both the bow and stern;
( 5 ) Vent to a vent mast under § 154.805, except a relief valve may vent to a common tank relief valve header if the back pressure is included in determining the required capacity under § 154.806;
( 6 ) Not vent to a common header or common vent mast if the relief valves are connected to cargo tanks carrying chemically incompatible cargoes;
( 7 ) Not have any stop valves or other means of isolating the cargo tank from its relief valve unless: ( i ) The stop valves are interlocked or arranged so that only one pressure relief valve is out of service at any one time;
( ii ) The interlock arrangement automatically shows the relief valve that is out of service; and
( iii ) The other valves have the relieving capacity required under § 154.806, or all relief valves on the cargo tank are the same size and there is a spare of the same size, or there is a spare for each relief valve on a cargo tank.
( d ) The pressure relief system must: ( 1 ) If the design temperature is below 0 °C (32 °F), be designed to prevent the relief valve from becoming inoperative due to ice formation; and
( 2 ) Be designed to prevent chattering of the relief valve.
[CGD 74-289, 44 FR 26009, May 3, 1979; 44 FR 59234, Oct. 15, 1979]
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

Editorial Note on Subpart 151.50 of Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart 151.50 of part 151 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, and CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996.

§ 151.50-36 Argon or nitrogen. ( a ) A cargo tank that contains argon or nitrogen and that has a maximum allowable working pressure of 172 kPa (25 psig) or greater must have one of the following arrangements: ( 1 ) A refrigeration system that keeps the tank pressure below the safety relief valve operating pressure when ambient temperatures are 46 °C (115 °F) air and 32 °C (90 °F) water.
( 2 ) A relief valve or pressure control valve that maintains the tank pressure below the setting of the tank's required safety relief valve in ambient temperatures of 46 °C (115 °F) air and 32 °C (90 °F) water.
( b ) A cargo tank with a maximum allowable working pressure of less than 172 kPa (25 psig) is approved by the Commandant (CG-ENG) on a case by case basis.
( c ) Section 151.50-30 also applies to the carriage of argon or nitrogen.
[CGD 88-100, 54 FR 40040, Sept. 29, 1989]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas H. Aasen, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end
of the period covered by the Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.



|                   |  |                                           
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2009 |  | /s/ THOMAS H. AASEN                       
|                   |  | Thomas H. Aasen                           
|                   |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
1

 A notice of a Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing by LeShon V. Stewart, one of the

applicants, is included in the application materials. Stewart submitted no

documentation showing the status of the bankruptcy, but Deutsche Bank Trust Co.

maintains that it filed a motion for relief from the stay of bankruptcy, which was

granted on August 25, 2014.

Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15D0050. JOHN K. BUAHIN et al. v. DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST

COMPANY.

In this dispossessory action, Deutsche Bank Trust Co. filed a motion to compel

payment of rent into the registry of the court, which the trial court granted on

September 2, 2014. On September 10, 2014, the applicants filed this application for

discretionary appeal, arguing that the superior court erred when it granted a writ of

possession. However, the applicants have not included an order granting a writ of

possession in their application materials.

1

The only order submitted in the application materials is the order granting

Deutsche Bank Trust Co.’s motion to compel payment of rent. As to that order, the

application is untimely. Generally, an application for discretionary appeal must be

filed within 30 days of entry of the order sought to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35

(d). But the underlying subject matter of an appeal controls over the relief sought in

determining the proper appellate procedure. Rebich v. Miles, 264 Ga. 467, 467-468

(448 SE2d 192) (1994). OCGA § 44-7-56 provides that an appeal from any

dispossessory judgment must be filed within seven days of the date the judgment was

October 02, 2014
entered. See Ray M. Wright, Inc. v. Jones, 239 Ga. App. 521 (521 SE2d 456) (1999).

Here, the application was not filed until eight days after entry of this order.

Accordingly, this application is untimely, and it is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

10/02/2014
#### HUDSON COUNTY BUS OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION ET AL. v. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS ET AL.

Submitted October term, 1928

Decided January 3, 1929.

Before Justices Mintuen, Black and Campbell.

Por the rule, *Barison & Barison.*

Contra, *William H. Speer*and *John W. Queen.*

Pee Cdeiam.

We have reached the conclusion that the writ applied for should not he allowed.

The rule to show cause is therefore discharged.
IIB 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1641 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 27, 2009 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To amend the National Trails System Act to provide for 

a study of the Cascadia Marine Trail. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1641 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF TRAIL FOR STUDY. 

2 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the 

3 ‘‘Cascadia Marine Trail Study Act’’. 

4 (b) DESIGNATION OF TRAIL FOR STUDY.—Section 

5 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 

6 1244(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(ll) Cascadia Marine Trail, a series of 

8 water trail routes encompassing approximately 2,300 

9 miles of shoreline in the State of Washington, ex10 tending from Point Roberts near the Canadian bor11 der to the southern reach of Puget Sound near 

12 Olympia. In conducting the study, the Secretary 

13 shall coordinate with appropriate Federal, State, 

14 local, tribal, and private entities, and may evaluate 

15 sites of recreational, scenic, or historic significance 

16 near the Cascadia Marine Trail for potential inclu17 sion in the Trail. The Secretary shall also consider 

18 what activities may be limited by the designation, in19 cluding existing activities, hunting, boating, or pro20 posed infrastructure improvements.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 26, 

2009. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
§ 137.325 General conduct of examination. ( a ) When conducting an examination of a towing vessel as required by this subpart, the surveyor must determine whether any defect, deterioration, damage, or modifications of the hull and related structure and components may adversely affect the vessel's seaworthiness or fitness or suitability for its route or service.
( b ) The examination must address the items in § 137.330 as applicable, and must include: ( 1 ) Access to internal spaces as appropriate;
( 2 ) A visual examination of the external structure of the vessel to confirm that the condition is properly maintained; and
( 3 ) A visual examination to confirm that unapproved modifications were not made to the vessel.
( c ) The thoroughness and stringency of the examination will depend upon the condition of the vessel.
( d ) The owner or managing operator must notify the cognizant OCMI when the condition of the vessel may create an unsafe condition.
( e ) The cognizant OCMI may require the owner or managing operator to provide for the attendance of a surveyor or auditor from a TPO to assist with verifying the vessel's compliance with the requirements in this subpart.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

EDWARD ANTHONY, *

* No. 14

- 680

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. * Filed: October 28, 2014

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation ; influenza (“flu”)

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * vaccine; shoulder injury related to

* vaccine administration; SIRVA

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Richard Gage

, Richard Gage, P.C.

, Cheyenne, WY

, for p etitioner;

Gordon E. Shemin , United States Dep ’ t of Justice, Washington, DC, for

r espondent.

UNPUBLISHED RULING FINDING ENTITLEMENT 1

On July 30, 2094

, Edward Anthony filed a petition under the National

Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

— 10 through 34 (2006), alleging

that he suffered a chronic left shoulder injury related to h is receipt of an influenza

(“flu”) vaccination in his left shoulder on October 31 , 2011.

In her Rule 4 (c) rep ort, respondent stated that she “ recommends that

compensation be awarded .” Resp’t ’s Rep’t , filed Oct. 28, 2014

, at 1

. Respondent

add ed that the Division of Vaccine Injury Compensation, U.S. Department of

Health and Human Services, has reviewed the facts of this case and has concluded

that the alleged injury , lasting for more than six months, “ is consistent with a

shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (‘SIRVA’)

, ” and thus that

1 T he E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17,

2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b),

the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical inf ormation or other

information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special

master will appear in the document posted on the website.2

“ pet itioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.”

Id. at 4 (citations omitted).

Special masters may determine whether a petitioner is entitled to

compensation based upon the record. A hearing is not required. 42 U.S.C. §

300 aa

- 13; Vaccine Rule 8(d). Based upon a review of the record as a whole, the

undersigned finds that petitioner has established that he is entitled to compensation

for h is injury

.

Accordingly, Mr. Anthony is entitled to compensation. T he process for

quantifying the amount of damages to which Mr. Anthony is entitled will be

discussed at the status conference previously set for Wednesday, November 5,

2014 at 3:30 P.M. Eastern Time

. 2

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Mary Hol mes , at (202) 357

-

63 53

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s /Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master

2 In anticipation of the status conference, petitioner shall begin gathering the m aterials

respondent requests in her Rule 4 Report. Resp’t ’s Rep’t at 4

- 5

.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-159]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


Pathways Group, Inc. (n/k/a Bicoastal Communications, Inc.); 
Order of Suspension of Trading

January 12, 2007.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Pathways Group, Inc. (n/k/a Bicoastal Communications, Inc.) because it 
has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 
2000.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in securities of the 
above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST on 
January 12, 2007, through 11:59 p.m. EST on January 26, 2007.

    By the Commission.
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-159 Filed 1-12-07; 11:25 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P