alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.174-11 Performance. ( a ) *Thermal protection.* The thermal protective aid must be designed to protect against loss of body heat as follows: ( 1 ) The thermal conductivity of the material from which the thermal protective aid is constructed must be not more than 0.25 W/(m−°K).
( 2 ) The thermal protective aid must prevent evaporative heat loss.
( 3 ) The aid must function properly at an air temperature of −30 °C (−22 °F) to + 20 °C (68 °F).
( b ) *Donning Time.* Each thermal protective aid must be designed to enable a person to don the aid correctly within one minute after reading the donning and use instructions described in § 160.174-15(a).
( c ) *Storage Temperature.* A thermal protective aid must not be damaged by storage in its storage case at any temperature between −30 °C (−22 °F) and + 65 C (149 °F).
( d ) *In water performance.* The thermal protective aid must be designed to permit the wearer to remove it in the water within two minutes, if it impairs ability to swim.
( e ) *Water penetration.* The fabric from which the thermal protective aid is constructed must maintain its watertight integrity when supporting a column of water 2 meters high.
( f ) *Oil resistance.* Each thermal protective aid must be designed to be useable after 24 hours exposure to diesel oil.
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.964 Discharge by gas pressurization. The person in charge of cargo transfer may not authorize cargo discharge by gas pressurization unless: ( a ) The tank to be offloaded has an SR or PV venting system;
( b ) The pressurization medium is either the cargo vapor or a nonflammable, nontoxic gas inert to the cargo; and
( c ) The pressurizing line has: ( 1 ) A pressure reducing valve whose setting does not exceed 90% of the tank's relief valve setting and a manual control valve between the pressure reducing valve and the tank; or
( 2 ) For an inert gas medium: ( i ) A safety relief valve with a cross sectional flow area at least equal to that of the pressurizing line and whose relieving pressure does not exceed 90 percent of the tank's relief valve setting;
( ii ) A manual control valve between the safety relief valve and the tank; and
( iii ) A check valve between the manual control valve and the tank.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-1017 

________________________________________________________________________ 

TRADE 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MALDIVES 

Signed at Male October 17, 2009 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 MALDIVES 

 Trade 

Agreement signed at Male October 17, 2009; 

 Entered into force October 17, 2009. 

 


NOTE: Text of first line on this page appears to be a duplication.
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 151.55-1 General. ( a ) This section provides special requirements for the materials of construction of equipment that may come into contact with various cargoes. Table 151.05 contains specific requirements for various cargoes.
( b ) Copper, copper alloys, zinc, and aluminum shall not be used as materials of construction for tanks, pipelines, valves, fittings, and other items of equipment that may come in contact with the cargo liquid or vapor. (Equivalent to § 151.56-1(a),(b), and (c).)
( c ) Copper, copper alloys, zinc, galvanized steel, and mercury shall not be used as materials of construction for tanks, pipelines, valves, fittings, and other items of equipment that may come in contact with the cargo liquid or vapor. (Equivalent to § 151.56-1(b),(c), and (g).)
( d ) Aluminum, magnesium, zinc, and lithium shall not be used as materials of construction for tanks, pipelines, valves, fittings, and other items of equipment that may come in contact with the cargo liquid or vapor. (Equivalent to § 151.56-1(a),(c), and (d).)
( e ) Copper and copper bearing alloys shall not be used as materials of construction for tanks, pipelines, valves, fittings, and other items of equipment that may come in contact with the cargo liquid or vapor. (Equivalent to § 151.56-1(b).)
( f ) Aluminum or copper or alloys of either shall not be used as materials of construction for tanks, pipelines, valves, fittings, and other items of equipment that may come in contact with the cargo vapor or liquid. (Equivalent to § 151.56-1(a) and (b).)
( g ) Aluminum, stainless steel, or steel covered with a suitable protective lining or coating shall be used as materials of construction for tanks, pipelines, valves fittings, and other items of equipment that may come in contact with the cargo liquid or vapor. (Equivalent to § 151.58-1(a).)
( h ) Alkaline or acidic materials, such as caustic soda or sulfuric acid, should not be allowed to contaminate this cargo.
( i ) For concentrations of 98 percent or greater, aluminum or stainless steel shall be used as materials of construction. For concentrations of less than 98 percent, 304L or 316 stainless steel shall be used as materials of construction.
( j ) Zinc, alloys that have more than 10 percent zinc by weight, and aluminum may not be used as materials of construction for tanks, pipelines, valves, fittings, and other items of equipment that may come in contact with cargo liquid or vapor. (Equivalent to § 151.56-1(a) and (c).)
[CGFR 70-10, 35 FR 3714, Feb. 25, 1970, as amended by CGD 73-275R, 41 FR 3087, Jan. 21, 1976; CGD 75-223, 42 FR 8378, Feb. 10, 1977; CGD 88-100, 54 FR 40041, Sept. 29, 1989]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1943]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Amended Notice

AGENCY: United States Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

Date and Time: Wednesday, April 18, 2007, 1 p.m.-4 p.m.

Place: Westin Crown Center, Room: Washington Park 3, One East Pershing 
Road, Kansas City, Missouri 64108, (816) 474-4400.

Agenda: The Commission will receive a presentation on and consider 
adopting a Spanish translation glossary of election terminology. The 
Commission will elect a vice-chair and will receive a presentation on 
the development of its election management guidelines. The Commission 
will also consider other administrative matters.
    This meeting will be open to the public.

Person to Contact for Information: Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 
566-3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-1943 Filed 4-16-07; 1:46 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cr-20780 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

CURTIS SCOTT, 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT’S APPEARANCE 

On May 1, 2019, the Court scheduled an in-person status conference in this 

action for May 10, 2019, at 9:30 a.m. (See Notice, ECF #520.) Defendant Curtis 

Scott is ordered to personally appear at that conference. (See id.) Through this order, 

the United States Marshals Service is authorized to use the minimum amount of 

force necessary to ensure Scott’s appearance in Court for the scheduled status 

conference. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: May 8, 2019 
 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on May 8, 2019, by electronic means and/or ordinary 

mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (810) 341-9764
No. 6181.

#### John Dailey v. The State.

Opinion delivered May 11, 1889.

1. Playing Cards, Etc.—Information.—A “gin” is not one of the places or houses designated by the statute as a “public place.” To charge the offense of playing cards in a public place, “to wit, a gin,” the information should have charged the facts which constituted the gin a public place.

•2. Same—Pact Case.—The information charged that the accused played the cards in Starkey’s gin. The proof was that he played cards in a fence corner, in a pasture and in a room near Starkey’s gin, but not at the gin. *Held,*insufficient to support a conviction.

Appeal from the District Court of San Saba. Tried below before the Hon. A. W. Moursund

The penalty assessed against the appellant was a fine of ten •dollars.

The opinion discloses the nature of the case.

No brief .for the appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Willson, Judge.

This conviction is not supported by the evidence in the record. Defendant is charged in the indictment with playing cards at a public place, to wit? at Starkey’s gin. It was not proved that he played cards at said gin.

Furthermore, the indictment is bad. A gin is not one of the places or houses designated by the statute as *public;*wherefore it was necessary to allege in the indictment the facts which made it a public place. (Tummins v. The State, 18 Texas Ct. App., 12.)

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution is dismissed.

*Reversed and*dismissed.
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.110-3 Testing, marking, and inspection requirements. ( a ) Continuous Ceilings (B-0 and B-15) (SOLAS) submitted for type approval must be tested for non-combustibility under Annex 1, Part 1, and then tested for fire resistance under Annex 1, Part 3, Appendix 2, of the FTP Code (incorporated by reference, see § 164.110-2).
( b ) All testing and inspections required by this subpart must be performed by an independent laboratory accepted by the Coast Guard under subpart 159.010 of this chapter. A list of independent laboratories accepted as meeting subpart 159.010 of this chapter is available online at *http://psix.uscg.mil/EQLabs/Default.aspx*.
( c ) The independent laboratory must perform an initial factory inspection to select the test specimens and establish the materials of construction, chemical make-up, dimensions, tolerances, and other related factors needed to confirm product consistency during follow-up production inspections.
( d ) Production inspections must be performed by the independent laboratory in accordance with subpart 159.007 of this chapter at least annually to confirm that no changes have been made to the product that may adversely affect its fire performance as a continuous ceiling.
( e ) The independent laboratory must prepare production inspection procedures and a report of the results of the fire testing program, and must furnish the manufacturer with three copies of each upon completion of the required testing.
( f ) Materials approved under this subpart must be shipped in packaging that is clearly marked with the name of the manufacturer, product designation, date of manufacture, batch or lot number, and Coast Guard type approval number.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Stacie Chism,

Plaintiff,

v.

ITT Educational Services, Inc. d/b/a ITT

Technical Institute; and DOES 1-10, inclusive,

Defendant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action No.: Case No. 2:14-cv-13574-

PDB-MKM

HON. Paul D. Borman

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT AND VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)

Stacie Chism (“Plaintiff”), by Plaintiff’s attorney, hereby withdraws the complaint and

voluntarily dismisses this action, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i).

Dated: December 4, 2014

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Sergei Lemberg______

Sergei Lemberg, Esq.

LEMBERG LAW, L.L.C.

A Connecticut Law Firm

1100 Summer Street, 3rd Floor

Stamford, CT 06905

Telephone: (203) 653-2250

Facsimile: (203) 653-3424

Attorneys for Plaintiff:

Stacie Chism

Case 2:14-cv-13574-PDB-MKM ECF No. 3 filed 12/04/14 PageID.9 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on December 4, 2014, a true and correct copy of the foregoing

Notice of Withdrawal of Complaint and Voluntary Dismissal of Action was served electronically

by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Electronic Document Filing

System (ECF) and mailed by first-class mail, postage prepaid to the parties listed below:

ITT Educational Services, Inc. d/b/a ITT Technical Institute

13000 North Meridian Street

Carmel, Indiana 46032

By_/s/ Sergei Lemberg____

 Sergei Lemberg

Case 2:14-cv-13574-PDB-MKM ECF No. 3 filed 12/04/14 PageID.10 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,604
<SECURITIES>                                     9,571
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,687
<ALLOWANCES>                                       353
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,275
<PP&E>                                           8,849
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,873
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,628
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,060
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,628
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,614
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,925
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  70
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,853
<INCOME-TAX>                                       748
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,105
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,105
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.19
 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
OF
NEXTERA ENTERPRISES, INC.
(Employee)
 Company  Optionee
      DEFINITIONS
  Section 1.1 Agreement
 Agreement
 Section 1.2 Option
 Option
 Section 1.3 Plan
 Plan




---



##### 



GRANT OF OPTION
 Section 2.1 Grant of Option
 
 Section 2.2 Purchase Price
  Section 2.3 Grant Date
 Grant Date
 Section 2.4 Consideration to Company
   PERIOD OF EXERCISABILITY
 Section 3.1 Commencement of Exercisability
     2




---



##### 



Section 3.2 Duration of Exercisability
  Section 3.3 Expiration of Option
      Section 3.4 Acceleration of Exercisability
   EXERCISE OF OPTION
 Section 4.1 Person Eligible to Exercise
  3




---



##### 



Section 4.2 Partial Exercise
  Section 4.3 Manner of Exercise
  Exhibit A
     provided however
  4




---



##### 



Section 4.4 Conditions to Issuance of Stock Certificates
       Section 4.5 Rights as Stockholder
   OTHER PROVISIONS
 Section 5.1 Administration
  5




---



##### 



Section 5.2 Option Not Transferable
  Section 5.3 Shares to Be Reserved
  Section 5.4 Notices
  Section 5.5 Titles
  Section 5.6 Construction
  6




---



##### 



Section 5.7 Conformity to Securities Laws
  Section 5.8 Amendments
  Section 5.9 Incorporation of Plan
   
 NEXTERA ENTERPRISES, INC.,
a Delaware corporationByName:Title:Print Name:OptioneeAddress
 7




---



##### 



Exhibit A
 NEXTERA ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTICE OF EXERCISE OF OPTION
 
  Type of
    
    Date
    
    Number of
    
    Option
    
    PaymentOption
    
    Granted
    
    Shares
    
    Price
    
    DueX
    
    =
  
 
  
 
 
 Date
    
    Optionees Signature
 INSIDER TRADING (Section 10b-5) REMINDERS
 You may be subject to additional legal restrictions and requirements. Contact the Companys legal
counsel with any questions.
# C_2015056EN.01001401.xml

| 16.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 December 2014 — Si.mobil v Commission

(Case T-201/11) (1)

1

((Competition - Abuse of dominant position - Slovenian mobile telephone services market - Decision rejecting a complaint - Case being dealt with by the competition authority of a Member State - No EU interest))

(2015/C 056/18)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Si.mobil telekomunikacijske storitve d.d. (Ljubljana, Slovenia) (represented by: P. Alexiadis and E. Sependa, Solicitors, and subsequently by P. Alexiadis, P. Figueroa Regueiro and A. Melihen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito, B. Gencarelli and A. Biolan, and subsequently by C. Giolito and A. Biolan, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Republic of Slovenia (represented by: T. Mihelič Žitko and V. Klemenc, acting as Agents); and Telekom Slovenije d.d. formerly Mobitel, telekomunikacijske storitve d.d. (Ljubljana, Slovenia) (represented by: J. Sladič and P. Sladič, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2011) 355 final of 24 January 2011 rejecting the applicant’s complaint concerning infringements of Article 102 TFEU allegedly committed by Mobitel on a number of wholesale and retail mobile telephone markets (Case COMP/39.707 — Si.mobil/Mobitel).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Si.mobil telekomunikacijske storitve d.d. to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission and by Telekom Slovenije d.d; |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Si.mobil telekomunikacijske storitve d.d. to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission and by Telekom Slovenije d.d;

| 3) | Orders the Republic of Slovenia to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders the Republic of Slovenia to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 160, 28.5.2011.

1

---
|EXHIBIT 32.2
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Belcrest Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                       
|   



|Date: August 8, 2008
|--------------------



| | /s/ Andrew C. FrenetteAndrew C. FrenetteChief Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.