alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**I, Cynthia K. Christy-Langenfeld, Chief Executive Officer of Lucent Technologies Inc., certifythat:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Lucent Technologies Inc. (the “registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in this case) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: December 14, 2006/s/Cynthia K. Christy-Langenfeld
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Brian G. Williams,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 14-14693

Mortgage Electronic Registration, Honorable Sean F. Cox

Systems, Inc., et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING 

3/26/15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

Plaintiff filed this action asserting claims against multiple Defendants. On January 21,

2015, Defendant REDC, LLC (“REDC”) fled a Motion to Dismiss. That motion was referred to

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Stafford for a Report and Recommendation.

On March 26, 2015, Magistrate Judge Stafford filed a Report and Recommendation

(Docket Entry No. 21) wherein she recommends that the Court grants REDC’s Motion to

Dismiss.

Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), a party objecting to the recommended disposition of a

matter by a Magistrate Judge must filed objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after

being served with a copy of the R&R. “The district judge to whom the case is assigned shall

make a de novo determination upon the record, or after additional evidence, of any portion of the

magistrate judge’s disposition to which specific written objection has been made.” Id. 

The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired and the docket reflects that neither

1

2:14-cv-14693-SFC-EAS Doc # 22 Filed 04/15/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 469
party has filed objections to the R&R. The Court hereby ADOPTS the March 26, 2015 R&R. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant REDC’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED

and all claims asserted against Defendant REDC are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

S/Sean F. Cox 

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge

Dated: April 15, 2015

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on

April 15, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Jennifer McCoy 

Case Manager

2

2:14-cv-14693-SFC-EAS Doc # 22 Filed 04/15/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 470
§ 137.305 Documenting compliance for the TSMS option. The owner or managing operator of a towing vessel, who has selected the TSMS option, must document compliance with this subpart as follows: ( a ) For vessels under the external survey program, provide objective evidence of compliance with § 137.310.
( b ) For vessels under the internal survey program, provide objective evidence of compliance with § 137.315.
( c ) Provide objective evidence that the vessel has undergone a drydock and internal structural examination, including options permitted in § 137.320 or § 137.322.
AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Eastern District of Michigan

Iron Workers Local 25 Pension Fund, et

al.,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 2:14−cv−13460−AJT−MKM

Hon. Arthur J. Tarnow

City Steel, Incorporated, et al.,

Defendant.

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: City Steel, Incorporated

 A lawsuit has been filed against you.

 Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) - or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R.

Civ. P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) - you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney,

whose name and address are:

David J. Selwocki

25800 Northwestern Highway

Suite 1000

Southfield, MI

48075−1000

If you fail to respond, judgment by default may be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You

also must file your answer or motion with the court.

DAVID J. WEAVER, CLERK OF COURT By: s/ D. Worth 

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Date of Issuance: September 8, 2014

2:14-cv-13460-AJT-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 09/08/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 8
AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action

Summons and Complaint Return of Service

Case No. 2:14−cv−13460−AJT−MKM

Hon. Arthur J. Tarnow

A copy of the Summons and Complaint has been served in the manner indicated below:

Name of Defendant Served: City Steel, Incorporated

Date of Service:

Method of Service

Personally served at this address:

Left copies at defendant's usual place of abode with (name of person):

Other (specify):

Returned unexecuted (reason):

Service Fees: Travel $ Service $ Total $ 

Declaration of Server

I declare under the penalty of perjury that the information contained in this Return of Service is true and correct.

Name of Server:

Signature of Server:

Date:

Server's Address:

2:14-cv-13460-AJT-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 09/08/14 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 9
§ 60.14 Reporting civil judgments related to the delivery of a health care item or service. ( a ) *Who must report.* Federal and state attorneys and health plans must report civil judgments against health care practitioners, providers, or suppliers related to the delivery of a health care item or service (regardless of whether the civil judgment is the subject of a pending appeal). If a government agency is party to a multi-claimant civil judgment, it must assume the responsibility for reporting the entire action, including all amounts awarded to all the claimants, both public and private. If there is no government agency as a party, but there are multiple health plans as claimants, the health plan which receives the largest award must be responsible for reporting the total action for all parties.
( b ) *What information must be reported.* Entities described in paragraph (a) of this section must report the information as required in § 60.13(b) of this part.
( c ) *What information may be reported, if known.* Entities described in paragraph (a) of this section should report, if known the information as described in § 60.13(c) of this part.
( d ) *Access to documents.* Each state must provide the Secretary (or an entity designated by the Secretary) with access to the documents underlying the actions described in paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) of this section, as may be necessary for the Secretary to determine the facts and circumstances concerning the actions and determinations for the purpose of carrying out section 1921.
( e ) *Sanctions for failure to report.* Any health plan that fails to report information on a civil judgment required to be reported under this section will be subject to a civil money penalty (CMP) of not more than $25,000 for each such adverse action not reported. Such penalty will be imposed and collected in the same manner as CMPs under subsection (a) of section 1128A of the Social Security Act. The Secretary will provide for publication of a public report that identifies those government agencies that have failed to report information on civil judgments as required to be reported under this section.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**R.S.,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 43 WM 2015** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 16th day of September, 2015, the Petition for Leave to File** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal** Nunc Pro Tunc **is** DENIED

**,** WITHOUT PREJUDICE **to**

**Petitioner’s right to seek similar relief through the P ost Conviction Relief Act.**  See **42**

**Pa.C.S. §9545(b) (stating that, in general, a Post Co nviction Relief Act petition shall be** 

**filed within one year of the date of when the judgm ent of sentence becomes final).**
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

PATRICIA LYNN WIESZCIECINSKI, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cv-14695 

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

 

ALBERT ALFRED GOULETTE, et al., 

 Defendants. 

__________________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING 

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 

 On December 11, 2014, Plaintiff Wieszciecinski filed a pro se Complaint1

 alleging a 

number of sundry causes of action. Plaintiff makes no discernible factual allegations in her 

complaint. The only matter contained in her complaint is the cause of action boxes she checked 

on the civil cover sheet, and the single attached page on which she has written the names and 

addresses of various individuals and, it appears, identified a wrongful death cause of action. ECF 

No. 1. 

On January 8, 2015, Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris issued a report recommending 

that Plaintiff’s Complaint be dismissed sua sponte because Plaintiff does not allege any basis for 

this Court’s jurisdiction. Rep. & Rec. 3, ECF No. 5. Judge Morris notes that Defendants are all 

citizens of Michigan and Plaintiff does not allege a federal cause of action. Id. 

The Magistrate Judge’s report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may object to 

and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report. Neither 

Plaintiff nor Defendants filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the Magistrate 

 

1

 The Complaint was, inexplicably, docketed as a notice of removal. 

1:14-cv-14695-TLL-PTM Doc # 9 Filed 05/08/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 22
- 2 - 

Judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. Thomas v. 

Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and recommendation 

waives any further right to appeal. 

Plaintiff did not file any objections. This could perhaps be explained by the fact that she 

was not served with the Report, which was returned undeliverable. ECF No. 8. All parties have 

an obligation to provide the Court with notice of new contact information. E.D. MICH. L.R. 11.2. 

A party’s noncompliance with Local Rule 11.2 can result in appropriate sanctions, including 

dismissal. Id. Since Plaintiff’s case is to be dismissed on other grounds, no sanctions will be 

imposed. As a practical matter, however, this order cannot be served upon her since she no 

longer has a current address listed on the docket. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, 

ECF No. 5, is ADOPTED. 

 It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE. 

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: May 8, 2015 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on May 8, 2015. 

 s/Karri Sandusky 

 Karri Sandusky, Acting Case Manager 

1:14-cv-14695-TLL-PTM Doc # 9 Filed 05/08/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 23
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1817 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1817

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
116 North West Street in Somerville, Tennessee, as the ``John S. Wilder 
                         Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. JOHN S. WILDER POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 116 North West Street in Somerville, Tennessee, shall be 
known and designated as the ``John S. Wilder Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John S. 
Wilder Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 60 (Thursday, March 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1542]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Confidentiality, 
Privacy, and Security Workgroup Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the ninth meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Confidentiality, Privacy, and Security Workgroup 
in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
5 U.S.C., App.).

DATES: April 12, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.

ADDRESSES: Hubert H. Humphrey Building (200 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 705A (please bring photo ID for 
entry to a Federal building).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/confidentiality/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Workgroup Members will continue 
discussing its working hypothesis, and its evaluation of the privacy 
and security protections for participants in an electronic health 
information exchange network at a local, state, regional, or nationwide 
level.
    The meeting will be available via Web cast at http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/cps_instruct.html.

    Dated: March 22, 2007.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 07-1542 Filed 3-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
```
#### § 167.05-10 Commandant.

This term means Commandant of the Coast Guard.
#### Annie Lynch, Appellant, *v.*The Shanley Company, Respondent.

(Argued May 7, 1907;

decided May 21, 1907.)

*Lynch*v. *Shanley Co.,*112 App. Div. 305, affirmed.

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered July 11, 1906, which reversed a judgment in favor of plain*635tiff entered upon, a verdict and aii order denying a motion for a hew trial and granted a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been caused through defendant’s negligence.

*Marston Wiles*and *WathamAel Wiles*for appellant.

*Soger B. Wood, George Gordon Battle*and *Frederich F. Fishel*for respondent.

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts;, no opinion.

Concur: Gray, O’Brien, Vann, Werner and Chase, JJ. Absent: Cullen, Ch. J. Not voting: Willard Bartlett, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,803
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,440
<PP&E>                                         982,091
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,614
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,271,472
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          274,421
<BONDS>                                      1,448,870
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,800
<OTHER-SE>                                     135,219
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,271,472
<SALES>                                         29,018
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,018
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  106,495
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               154,725
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,837
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (239,391)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (239,391)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (236,785)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)




</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alliance Atlantis Communications Inc. (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the year
ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Lazzarato, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|                |  | By: | /s/DAVID LAZZARATOName: David Lazzarato
Title: Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
|--------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|March 20, 2006.

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2

PROTALIX BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Protalix BioTherapeutics, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Yossi Maimon, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, ‘‘filed’’ with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: March 17, 2008

/s/ Yossi Maimon
Yossi Maimon
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---
|EXHIBIT 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Belcrest Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                            



|Date: November 9, 2009
|----------------------



|/s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.Thomas E. Faust Jr.Chief Executive Officer
|-----------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.