alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**HOME | 	  ABOUT US | 	  CONTACT | 	  REGIONAL MANAGERS**Nautical Charts & Pubs****Surveys & Wrecks****GIS & Other Products****Research & Development****Customer Service****Business Opportunities****Education****Chart: 12243          Edition: 14          Edition Date: November 2009          Clear Dates: NM - 12/17/2011     LNM - 12/13/2011**Download RNCNotice ListingFind A Chart Site-  **Click the +/- buttons and drag the slider tool (solid triangle) 				to zoom in and out.** 
-  **Click the arrow buttons to pan left/right and up/down.** 
-  **Drag 				the navigation box in the upper left hand corner to move around 				the chart image.								This chart display or derived product can be used as a planning or analysis tool and may not be used as a navigational aid. 								NOTE: Use the official, full scale NOAA nautical chart for real navigation whenever possible.  These are available from authorized 				NOAA nautical chart sales agents.  Screen captures of the on-line viewable charts available here do NOT fulfill chart carriage 				requirements for regulated commercial vessels under Titles 33 and 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations.								Adobe Flash Player		  		is required to view the chart image.				Powered by Zoomify.** 
Privacy  |  Disclaimer  |  NOAA's National Ocean Service  |  NOAA  |  U.S. Department of Commerce **
# C_2012025EN.01004001.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/40

---

Appeal brought on 24 November 2011 by Regione Puglia against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 14 September 2011 in Case T-84/10 Regione Puglia v Commission

(Case C-586/11 P)

(2012/C 25/75)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Regione Puglia (represented by: F. Brunelli and A. Aloia, avvocati)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

| — | Set aside the order made on 14 September 2011 by the General Court, notified to the appellant on 15 September 2011, declaring that the action in Case T-84/10 is inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the order made on 14 September 2011 by the General Court, notified to the appellant on 15 September 2011, declaring that the action in Case T-84/10 is inadmissible;

| — | Accordingly, analyse the substance of the case and, consequently, annul Decision C(2009) 10350 of the European Commission of 22 December 2009 concerning ‘the lifting of the suspension of interim payments from the European Regional Development Fund relating to the programme to which this decision refers’, confirming the validity and applicability only of the provision made in Article 4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Accordingly, analyse the substance of the case and, consequently, annul Decision C(2009) 10350 of the European Commission of 22 December 2009 concerning ‘the lifting of the suspension of interim payments from the European Regional Development Fund relating to the programme to which this decision refers’, confirming the validity and applicability only of the provision made in Article 4;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant alleges, first, procedural irregularities in the proceedings before the court at first instance, which were seriously detrimental to the appellant, namely the omission of the oral procedure provided for in Article 114(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.

Second, the appellant claims that the General Court infringed Community law, first, by misinterpreting the fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU and Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, (1) in conjunction with Article 4(2) and (3) TFEU and Article 5(3) TFEU, and, second, failing to state adequate grounds for its findings, in breach of Article 81 of its Rules of Procedure.

---

(1)  OJ 1999 L 161, p. 1.

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1504]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Emphasis Panel, Anesthetics: Cellular and Molecular 
Actions.
    Date: April 19, 2007.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of General Medical Sciences, Natcher 
Building, 45 Center Drive, Room 3AN-18, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Brian R. Pike, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center 
Drive, Room 3AN18, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-3907, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4030292b2232002d21292c6e2e29286e272f36"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="95e5fcfef7e7d5f8f4fcf9bbfbfcfdbbf2fae3">[email protected]</span></a>.


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 20, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1504 Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2008101EN.01002301.xml

| 23.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/23

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on Mergers given at its meeting of 19 November 2007 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/M.4662 — Syniverse/BSG

Rapporteur: France

(2008/C 101/07)

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees that the proposed concentration by which the undertaking Syniverse Technologies, Inc. acquires control of the wireless business of BSG constitutes a concentration within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation and that the Commission has become competent to review this concentration following the referral according to Article 4(5) of the Merger Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees that the proposed concentration by which the undertaking Syniverse Technologies, Inc. acquires control of the wireless business of BSG constitutes a concentration within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation and that the Commission has become competent to review this concentration following the referral according to Article 4(5) of the Merger Regulation.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees that there is a relevant product market for GSM roaming data clearing services. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees that there is a relevant product market for GSM roaming data clearing services.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees that it can be left open for the purposes of the present case whether the relevant geographic market is to be considered EEA wide or global in scope. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees that it can be left open for the purposes of the present case whether the relevant geographic market is to be considered EEA wide or global in scope.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees that the proposed concentration does not lead to concerns with respect to unilateral effects. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees that the proposed concentration does not lead to concerns with respect to unilateral effects.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee agrees that the proposed concentration does not lead to concerns with respect to coordinated effects. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees that the proposed concentration does not lead to concerns with respect to coordinated effects.

| 6. | The Advisory Committee agrees that the proposed concentration would not significantly impede effective competition in the common market or a substantial part of it and that therefore the proposed concentration can be declared compatible with the common market and the EEA agreement. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The Advisory Committee agrees that the proposed concentration would not significantly impede effective competition in the common market or a substantial part of it and that therefore the proposed concentration can be declared compatible with the common market and the EEA agreement.

---
#### § 144.305 Stability standards for a new vessel.

Each new vessel must meet the applicable stability requirements of part 170 and, if applicable, of part 173, subpart E, of this chapter in addition to the requirements in the following table:

| Each new vessel certificated to operate on— | Must meet the requirements of— |
| --- | --- |
| (a) Protected waters | § 170.173(e)(2) of this chapter. |
| (b) Partially protected waters | §§ 170.170 and 170.173(e)(1) of this chapter. |
| (c) Exposed waters or that is assigned a load line | §§ 170.170 and 174.145 of this chapter. |

Table 144.305—Stability Standards for a New Vessel
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.805 Vent masts. Relief valves or common vent headers from relief valves must discharge to a vent mast that: ( a ) Discharges vertically upward;
( b ) Has a rain cap or other means of preventing the entrance of rain or snow;
( c ) Has a screen with 25mm (1 inch) wire mesh or bars not more than 25mm (1 in.) apart on the discharge port;
( d ) Extends at least to a height of B/3 or 6m (19.7 ft.), whichever is greater, above the weather deck and 6m (19.7 ft.) above the working level;
( e ) For a cargo tank, does not exhaust cargo vapors within a radius of B or 25m (82 ft.), whichever is less, from any forced or natural ventilation intake or other opening to an accommodation, service, control station, or other gas-safe space, except that for vessels less than 90m (295 ft.) in length, shorter distances may be specially approved by the Commandant (CG-OES);
( f ) For a containment system, except a cargo tank, does not exhaust vapor within a radius of 10m (32.8 ft.) or less from any forced or natural ventilation intake or other opening to an accommodation, service, control station, or other gas-safe space;
( g ) Has drains to remove any liquid that may accumulate; and
( h ) Prevents accumulations of liquid at the relief valves.
[CGD 74-289, 44 FR 26009, May 3, 1979, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4782, Feb. 3, 1983]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            5,986
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    64,835
<ALLOWANCES>                                        974
<INVENTORY>                                      61,791
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                148,366
<PP&E>                                          138,867
<DEPRECIATION>                                   66,990
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  253,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            70,052
<BONDS>                                         100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                         521
<COMMON>                                              2
<OTHER-SE>                                       27,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    253,072
<SALES>                                         230,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                230,074
<CGS>                                           163,843
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    59,361
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     88
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               10,765
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   9,795
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2,608
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               7,187
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      7,187
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0



</TABLE>
# C_2016287EN.01003601.xml

| 8.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/36

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 24 June 2016 —Simpson v Council

(Case F-142/11 RENV) (1)

1

((Civil service - Referral back to the Tribunal after setting aside - Officials - Upgrade - Decision not to award the applicant grade AD 9 after he had passed a grade AD 9 open competition - Obligation to state grounds - Equal treatment - Manifest error of assessment - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure - Action manifestly unfounded))

(2016/C 287/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Erik Simpson (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and E. Rebasti, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for the annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 9 after he had been successful in competition EPSO/AD/113/07 ‘Heads of unit (AD 9) in the field of translation having Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovak and Slovene as their main language’, and an application for damages.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Simpson shall bear his own costs in Cases F-142/11, T-130/14 P and F-142/11 RENV respectively and pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union in Case F-142/11. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Simpson shall bear his own costs in Cases F-142/11, T-130/14 P and F-142/11 RENV respectively and pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union in Case F-142/11.

| 3. | The Council of the European Union shall bear its own costs in Cases T-130/14 P and F 142/11 RENV. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Council of the European Union shall bear its own costs in Cases T-130/14 P and F 142/11 RENV.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 3/3/2012, p. 26 (initial case).

1

---
§ 618.535 Effect of state or local law or other requirements. ( a ) *Prohibitory requirements.* The obligation to comply with §§ 618.500 through 618.550 is not obviated or alleviated by the existence of any State or local law or other requirement that imposes prohibitions or limits upon employment of members of one sex that are not imposed upon members of the other sex.
( b ) *Benefits.* A recipient that provides any compensation, service, or benefit to members of one sex pursuant to a State or local law or other requirement shall provide the same compensation, service, or benefit to members of the other sex.
# C_2008017EN.01000401.xml

| 24.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 17/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 17/4

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1628/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to national regional investment aid

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 17/03)

| Aid No | XR 59/07 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Spain |
| Region | Extremadura |
| Title of aid scheme or the name of the undertaking receiving ad hoc aid supplement | Incentivos Extremeños a la Inversión |
| Legal basis | Decreto no 20/2007, de 6 de febrero, por el que se establece un régimen de incentivos industriales extremeños a la inversión para el tejido empresarial de esta Comunidad Autónoma (D.O.E. no 18 de 13 de febrero)
  Decreto no 21/2007, de 6 de febrero, por el que se establece un régimen de incentivos agroindustriales extremeños en el ámbito de la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura (D.O.E. no 18 de 13 de febrero) |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Annual budget | EUR 28,5 million |
| Maximum aid intensity | 40 % |
| In conformity with Article 4 of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 14.2.2007 |
| Duration | 31.12.2013 |
| Economic sectors | All sectors eligible for regional investment aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Junta de Extremadura |
| Paseo de Roma, s/n |
| E-06800 Mérida–Badajoz |
| E-mail: dge.eci@juntaextremadura.net |

Aid No

XR 59/07

Member State

Spain

Region

Extremadura

Title of aid scheme or the name of the undertaking receiving ad hoc aid supplement

ad hoc

Incentivos Extremeños a la Inversión

Legal basis

Decreto no 20/2007, de 6 de febrero, por el que se establece un régimen de incentivos industriales extremeños a la inversión para el tejido empresarial de esta Comunidad Autónoma (D.O.E. no 18 de 13 de febrero)

o

o

Decreto no 21/2007, de 6 de febrero, por el que se establece un régimen de incentivos agroindustriales extremeños en el ámbito de la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura (D.O.E. no 18 de 13 de febrero)

o

o

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Annual budget

EUR 28,5 million

Maximum aid intensity

40 %

In conformity with Article 4 of the Regulation

Date of implementation

14.2.2007

Duration

31.12.2013

Economic sectors

All sectors eligible for regional investment aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Junta de Extremadura

Paseo de Roma, s/n

E-06800 Mérida–Badajoz

E-mail: dge.eci@juntaextremadura.net

Internet address of the publication of the aid scheme

http://doe.juntaex.es/pdfs/doe/2007/180O/07040022.pdf

http://doe.juntaex.es/pdfs/doe/2007/180O/07040021.pdf

Other information

—

---
- 3131
- 3132
- 3133
- 3134
- 3135
# C_2011331EN.01000801.xml

| 12.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/8

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg (Germany) lodged on 16 August 2011 — Katja Ettwein v Finanzamt Konstanz

(Case C-425/11)

2011/C 331/12

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Katja Ettwein

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt Konstanz

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Are the provisions of the Agreement of 21 June 1999 (1) between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons (BGBl. II 2001, 810 et seq.), which was passed as a Law by the Bundestag on 2 September (BGBl. II 2001, 810) and entered into force on 1 June (‘the Agreement on free movement’), in particular Articles 1, 2, 11, 16 and 21 thereof and Articles 9, 13 and 15 of Annex I thereto, to be interpreted as precluding a rule under which spouses who live in Switzerland and are subject to taxation in the Federal Republic of Germany on their entire taxable income cannot be granted joint assessment, regard being had to the ‘splitting’ regime?

1

---

(1)  Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons — Final Act — Joint Declarations — Information relating to the entry into force of the seven Agreements with the Swiss Confederation in the sectors free movement of persons, air and land transport, public procurement, scientific and technological cooperation, mutual recognition in relation to conformity assessment, and trade in agricultural products, OJ 2002 L 114, p. 6.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.440 Allowable stress. ( a ) The allowable stresses for an independent tank type A must: ( 1 ) For tank web frames, stringers, or girders of carbon manganese steel or aluminum alloys, meet σB/2.66 or σY/1.33, whichever is less; and
( 2 ) For other materials, be specially approved by the Commandant (CG-ENG).
( b ) A greater allowable stress than required in paragraph (a)(1) of this section may be specially approved by the Commandant (CG-ENG) if the equivalent stress (σc) is calculated from the formula in appendix A of this part.
( c ) Tank plating must meet the American Bureau of Shipping's deep tank standards, for an internal pressure head that meets § 154.439(a), published in “Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels”, 1981.
[CGD 74-289, 44 FR 26009, May 3, 1979, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4782, Feb. 3, 1983; CGD 77-069, 52 FR 31630, Aug. 21, 1987]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Bobby Yazdani, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Saba Software, Inc. (the
Company) hereby certify, as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: April 8, 2009



By:

/s/     BOBBY YAZDANIBobby YazdaniChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board