alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011347EN.01004701.xml

| 26.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/47

---

Action brought on 3 October 2011 — ZZ v Parliament

(Case F-97/11)

2011/C 347/89

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: P. Nelissen Grade and G. Leblanc, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the Parliament as to the date to be regarded as that on which the applicant’s change of marital status took effect for the purposes of withdrawing the household allowance following the civil judgment pronouncing the applicant’s divorce.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the appointing authority of 4 July 2011 partially dismissing the applicant’s complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the appointing authority of 4 July 2011 partially dismissing the applicant’s complaint;

| — | annul the decision of the appointing authority of 21 January 2011, notified by the Streamline administrative management application, to fix the date on which the change in the applicant’s marital status took effect as the date of the judgment pronouncing the divorce; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the appointing authority of 21 January 2011, notified by the Streamline administrative management application, to fix the date on which the change in the applicant’s marital status took effect as the date of the judgment pronouncing the divorce;

| — | indicate to the appointing authority the effects of the annulment of the contested decisions, and, in particular, the date to be taken as that on which the judgment pronouncing the applicant’s divorce from his ex-wife took effect, namely the date of the transcription of the judgment, which took place on 26 April 2011; |
| --- | --- |

—

indicate to the appointing authority the effects of the annulment of the contested decisions, and, in particular, the date to be taken as that on which the judgment pronouncing the applicant’s divorce from his ex-wife took effect, namely the date of the transcription of the judgment, which took place on 26 April 2011;

| — | order the Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Parliament to pay the costs.

---
Case 2:14-cv-13683-AC-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 09/23/14 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:14-cv-13683-AC-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 09/23/14 PageID.2 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:14-cv-13683-AC-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 09/23/14 PageID.3 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:14-cv-13683-AC-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 09/23/14 PageID.4 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:14-cv-13683-AC-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 09/23/14 PageID.5 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:14-cv-13683-AC-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 09/23/14 PageID.6 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:14-cv-13683-AC-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 09/23/14 PageID.7 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:14-cv-13683-AC-DRG ECF No. 1 filed 09/23/14 PageID.8 Page 8 of 8
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.480 Stripping quantity for Category B and C NLS tanks on ships built after June 30, 1986: Categories B and C. Unless waived under § 153.491, Category B and C NLS cargo tanks on each ship built after June 30, 1986 must have stripping quantities determined under § 153.1604 that are less than— ( a ) 0.15 m3 if Category B; and
( b ) 0.35 m3 if Category C.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.14



   FROM:    Sheldon Rose                         DATE:     November 13, 2000

     TO:    Morgan Brewer Securities, Inc.         RE:     Registration




================================================================================


      This memorandum is to acknowledge and confirm in writing the understanding
between The Rose Group Corporation of Nevada (the "Company") and Morgan Brewer
Securities, Inc. concerning the Financial Advisory Agreement between the
parties. This is to confirm that the Company will undertake to issue and
register an aggregate of 400,000 shares of the Company's common stock on the
Company's next registration statement on Form SB-2 to be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. However, of the 400,000 shares registered,
two hundred thousand shares will be held by the Company or its escrow agent and,
pursuant to the Financial Advisory Agreement, if the Company is not satisfied
with the services rendered by Morgan Brewer Securities, Inc. within the first
six months of its term, the Company has the right to cancel the agreement and
shall not be obligated to issue the outstanding two hundred thousand registered,
but unissued, shares of common stock.



                                          THE ROSE GROUP CORPORATION
                                             OF NEVADA


                                          By:  /s/ Sheldon R. Rose
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                 SHELDON R. ROSE, President




                                          MORGAN BREWER SECURITIES, INC.


                                          By:  /s/ A. Hager Bryant III
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                 A. HAGER BRYANT III, President
#### § 167.50-1 Hospital accommodations.

Each nautical school ship, which makes voyages of more than 3 days' duration between ports and carries 12 or more persons, shall be equipped with a compartment suitably separated from other spaces for hospital purposes, and such compartment shall have at least 1 bunk for every 12 persons allowed to be carried: *Provided,* That not more than 6 bunks shall be required in any case.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Derek Reed,

Plaintiff(s),

v. Case No. 5:14−cv−14842−JEL−RSW

Hon. Judith E. Levy

GFI HOLDINGS, LLC., et al.,

Defendant(s).

CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT

Party in Default: GFI HOLDINGS, LLC.

 The default of the party named above for failure to plead or otherwise defend is entered.

Certificate of Service

 I hereby certify that on this date a copy of the foregoing notice was served upon the parties

and/or counsel of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail.

DAVID J. WEAVER, CLERK OF COURT

By: s/ D. Worth 

Deputy Clerk

Dated: January 16, 2015

5:14-cv-14842-JEL-RSW Doc # 6 Filed 01/16/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 18
2:14-cr-20519-MOB-MKM Doc # 7 Filed 12/18/14 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 89
2:14-cr-20519-MOB-MKM Doc # 7 Filed 12/18/14 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 90
2:14-cr-20519-MOB-MKM Doc # 7 Filed 12/18/14 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 91
§ 120.530 Hazardous areas. ( a ) Electrical equipment in lockers used to store paint, oil, turpentine, or other flammable liquids must be explosion-proof or be part of an intrinsically safe system.
( b ) Explosion-proof equipment and intrinsically safe systems must meet the requirements of § 111.105 in subchapter J of this chapter.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40660 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus FERNANDO MORENO-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-97-CR-101-1

- - - - - - - - - - April 8, 1998 Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Fernando Moreno-Rodriguez appeals from his sentence for illegal reentry into the United States after his deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Moreno-Rodriguez argues that although he was charged with illegal reentry under § 1326(a) and § 1326(b)(2), he should not have been sentenced under § 1326(b)(2) because the indictment failed to allege that he had a prior aggravated felony conviction. His argument is foreclosed by the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , __ U.S.No. 97-40660 -2- __, 1998 WL 126904, at *3, *8 (U.S. Mar. 24, 1998). AFFIRMED.
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 151.01-2 Incorporation by reference.

(a) Certain standards and specifications are incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a). To enforce any edition other than the ones listed in paragraph (b) of this section, notice of change must be published in the Federal Register and the material made available to the public. All approved material is on file at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), and is available from the sources indicated in paragraph (b) of this section. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.*

(b) The standards and specifications approved for incorporation by reference in this part and the sections affected, are:

## American Society for Nondestructive Testing (ASNT)

4153 Arlingate Road, Caller #28518, Columbus, OH 43228-0518

ASNT “Recommended Practice No. SNT-TC-1A (1988), Personnel Qualification and Certification in Nondestructive Testing”151.04-7(c)(2)

## American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) International

Three Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990

ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section V, Nondestructive Examination (1986)151.04-7(a)(1)

## American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)

100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM D 4986-98, Standard Test Method for Horizontal Burning Characteristics of Cellular Polymeric Materials151.15-3

ASTM E 84-98, Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials—151.15-3

[CGD 85-061, 54 FR 50965, Dec. 11, 1989, as amended by USCG-1999-6216, 64 FR 53227, Oct. 1, 1999; USCG-1999-5151, 64 FR 67183, Dec. 1, 1999; 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004]
# C_2012025EN.01006801.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/68

---

Action brought on 11 October 2011 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-104/11)

(2012/C 25/130)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: P. Homoki, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of EPSO decision to reopen the procedure for open competition EPSO/AD/56/06 and the decision of the selection board relating to the results of competition EPSO/AD/56/06 — Administrator grade A5 with Hungarian citizenship and payment of compensation.

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of EPSO of 15 January 2011 relating to the reopening of the competition in respect of the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of EPSO of 15 January 2011 relating to the reopening of the competition in respect of the applicant;

| — | annul the decision of the EPSO selection board of 14 July 2011 relating to the results of competition EPSO/AD/56/06 — Administrator grade A5 with Hungarian citizenship; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the EPSO selection board of 14 July 2011 relating to the results of competition EPSO/AD/56/06 — Administrator grade A5 with Hungarian citizenship;

| — | order the defendant to pay fair compensation for the loss caused to the applicant by the measure annulled through the grant of monetary compensation; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay fair compensation for the loss caused to the applicant by the measure annulled through the grant of monetary compensation;

| — | in the alternative, order the defendant to establish a dialogue with the applicant with a view to attempting to reach an agreement offering the applicant fair compensation; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, order the defendant to establish a dialogue with the applicant with a view to attempting to reach an agreement offering the applicant fair compensation;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

MICHAEL MILES, Individually, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

LAKEVIEW HILLS COUNTRY 

CLUB, LTD., a Michigan Corporation, 

 Defendant. 

________________________________/

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

Case No. 14-cv-14702 

Honorable Linda V. Parker 

AMENDED STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

This matter having come before the Court on the Stipulation of the parties; 

the parties having entered into a Settlement Agreement and Release dated 

November 6, 2015 (the “Settlement Agreement”), and the Court being otherwise 

fully advised in the premises; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 

1. This action shall be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice and without 

costs or attorney fees to any party except as provided in the Settlement Agreement. 

2. The Court retains jurisdiction over this matter for the sole purpose of 

enforcing the terms of the Settlement Agreement, if necessary. 

 s/ Linda V. Parker 

 LINDA V. PARKER 

 U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 4:14-cv-14702-LVP-EAS ECF No. 22 filed 11/19/15 PageID.59 Page 1 of 2
 2 

Dated: November 19, 2015 

The parties to this action, by their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate to entry of 

the above Order. 

/s/ Owen B. Dunn, Jr. 

Owen B. Dunn, Jr. 

LAW OFFICE OF OWEN B. DUNN, JR. 

The Ottawa Hills Shopping Center 

4334 W. Central Avenue, Suite 222 

Toledo, OH 43615 

Telephone: (419) 241-9661 

Fax: (419) 241-9737 

Email: dunnlawoffice@sbcglobal.net 

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF 

/s/ Kevin A. Fanning 

Kevin A. Fanning 

Clark Hill PLC 

151 S. Old Woodward, Suite 200 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

248.642.9692 

Email: kfanning@clarkhill.com 

Attorneys for Lakeview Hills Country 

Club 

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT 

Case 4:14-cv-14702-LVP-EAS ECF No. 22 filed 11/19/15 PageID.60 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, March 5, 2007, 12 p.m. to March 5, 2007, 4 p.m. National Institutes of Health, 6130 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 11, 2007, 72 FR1335.                

The meeting notice is changed to reflect the date change from March 5, 2007 to April 13, 2007. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: April 5, 2007.

Anna Snouffer,

Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-1849  Filed 4-13-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
## Martin , Michae l (OST) i^)c)ck:e. 4 D o ^ ~ OST - QOO:i . ^ U ^7 U From : Salin a Manage r[slnnngr@mail.flygreatlakes.com ] ; I i . : v,!;.;iL; , Sent : Thursday , February18 , 201 0 2:4 0 P M To : EA S (OST ) Subject : RE:Grea t Lake s I n Salin a Dea rSir , M ynam e i s Sea n Franci s I a m th e Salin a statio n Managerfo rGrea t Lake s Airlines i n Salina . I wa s lookin g a t th e bid s fo rEA S fo rth e next 2 year s an d m yconcer n i s Security . Wit h Se a Port w e tak e al l pa xt o a n FB O an d the ywil l lan d a t a n FB O i n Kansa s Cit ythi s i s nic e fo rpassenger s bu t the ystil l nee d t o chec k i n agai n i n Kansa s Cit ywhic h isn' t a proble m fo rmos t pa xexcep t the yno wnee d t o chec k i n agai n an d g o throug h security . Grea t Lake s ha s som e problem s wit h o n tim e percentages , bu t wit h th e ne wbi d Grea t Lake s i s thinkin g ofhavin g 3 flight s a da yt o Denve ran d makin g Salin a th e startin g poin t s o ou ron-tim e woul d improv e greatly . B ypullin g ou t of Kansa s Cit ythi s woul d fre e u p mor e plane s an d mak e flyin g ou t o fSalin a mor e affordable . Denve ri s a bigge rhu b an d mor e accessibl e fo rpa xtravelin g ou t of Salin a an d mak e i t easie rfo rbusines s peopl e t o mak e plan s i n Denver . Man yof ou rpassenger s wh o d o fl you t of Salin a g o t o Kansa s Cit yan d o n t o Denve ro n Unite d o rFrontier . Whe n w e firs t starte d operatio n i n Salin a wit h Grea t Lake s w e ha d a 8:00a m fligh t t o Denve ran d w e wer e puttin g o n 8-1 0 passenger s a flight . Tha n Grea t Lake s change d tha t fligh t t o 1:00p m an d i t reall yhurt ou rnumbers . Wit h al l th e securit yissue s i n Americ a I woul d rathe rhav e TS Acheckin g al l bag s an d passenger s a s the yfl yknowin g tha t onc e i n th e ai rI ca n fee l mor e secur e abou t ou rpassenger s flyin g o n ou rairline . Eve n wit h th e problem s Grea t lake s ha s ha d kee p i n min d the ytoo k ove rmos t of Ai rMidwes t city s whe n th e pulle d ou t ofher e an d i t ca n b e ovenwhelmin g fo r an yairlin e t o jum p i n t o s o man ycity s a t onc e I stil l hav e fait h i n ou rAirlin e an d hop e the yar e awarde d th e bi d fo r2 mor e years . You rtrul y Sea n Francis/SL N
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.444 General.

An independent tank type B must be designed to meet §§ 154.445 through 154.449.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Barry L. Lazarus, the Chief Executive Officer of Inland Retail Real Estate Trust, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that, to my knowledge:

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | This quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 ("Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                     





|      | /s/ Barry L. Lazarus    | 
|----- | ----------------------- | 
|      |                         | 
|By:   | Barry L. Lazarus        | 
|      | Chief Executive Officer
|      |                         | 
|Date: | May 6, 2005             |
PUBLIC LAW 112–49—NOV. 7, 2011 125 STAT. 543 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2062: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 157 (2011): 

July 28, 30, considered and passed House. 

October 20, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 112–49 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 45 Meetinghouse Lane in Sagamore Beach, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Matthew A. Pucino Post 

Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. MATTHEW A. PUCINO POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 45 Meetinghouse Lane in Sagamore Beach, 

Massachusetts, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Matthew 

A. Pucino Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Matthew A. Pucino Post Office’’. 

Approved November 7, 2011. 

Nov. 7, 2011 

[H.R. 2062] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

CYNTHIA WOODS, 

Plaintiff, Case No. 2:14-cv-12896-LPZ-DRG 

v. Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff 

 

LAFONTAINE VOLKSWAGEN, INC., 

(d/b/a LAFONTAINE VOLKSWAGEN OF 

DEARBORN), MICHIGAN RECOVERY 

SERVICES, INC., BROWNSTOWN 

TOWNSHIP, OFFICER DOE, SARGENT DOE, 

Defendants. 

__________________________________________/ 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

 On December 9, 2014, this Court entered a stipulated order dismissing Plaintiff Cynthia 

Woods’ claims against Defendants LaFontaine Volkswagen, Inc., and Michigan Recovery 

Services, Inc., and submitting the claims to arbitration [dkt. # 18]. On January 23, 2015, the 

Court received a stipulated order of dismissal from Plaintiff dismissing all remaining claims 

against all remaining parties [dkt. # 19]. Pursuant to this stipulation, the matter will be dismissed 

with prejudice. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE. This is the final order in this matter and closes the case. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Bernard A. Friedman for 

 Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff 

 Date: January 27, 2015 United States District Court 

2:14-cv-12896-LPZ-DRG Doc # 20 Filed 01/27/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 144
#### Moses Parsons, *as Executor, etc., Respondent, v.*Robert Riby, Jr., *Appellant*.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Hardin, J.