alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Earnest Mathis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mycom Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
         is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
         this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:   August 21, 2006


                                  /s/ Earnest Mathis
                                  ------------------
                                  Earnest Mathis, Chief Executive Officer




<PAGE>
Argued and submitted January 24,

reversed February 14, 1996

#### In the Matter of the Marriage of Rhonda E. SIMPSON, nka Rhonda E. Johnson, *Petitioner, and*Gregory J. SIMPSON, *Respondent.*STATE OF OREGON ex rel Rhonda E. JOHNSON, *Respondent, v.*Gregory J. SIMPSON, *Appellant.*

(84-6-123; CA A87465)

910 P2d 1180

Michael J. Clancy argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

J. Gary McClain argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Mundorff, McClain & Korvac.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Edmonds and Armstrong, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*153PER CURIAM

Husband appeals from a judgment in a contempt proceeding. We reverse.

Husband and wife were divorced under a judgment that was entered on November 20, 1984. The judgment awarded wife an equitable lien in the amount of $5,000 “due and payable on or before November 19, 1994.” Wife never renewed the judgment and it expired, pursuant to ORS 18.360(1),1 on November 20, 1994. Wife initiated a contempt proceeding to enforce the lien in December 1994. The trial court held that the lien was enforceable. We disagree. Because payment of the lien was due before the expiration of the judgment, the “savings clause” in ORS 18.360(2)2 does not apply, and the lien expired with the judgment on November 20, 1994.

Reversed.

1

 ORS 18.360(1) provides, in part, that “[w]henever after the entry of a judgment, a period of 10 years elapses, the judgment and any docketed or recorded lien thereof shall expire.”

2

 ORS 18.360(2) provides that, when a dissolution judgment requires the payment of money on a date ten or more years from the date of the judgment, the part of the judgment that requires that payment does not expire until ten years after the date on which the payment becomes due, even though the balance of the judgment would expire in ten years if not renewed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,772
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             439
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               135,440
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     36,104
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          49,765
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            50,091
<LOANS>                                        470,295
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,695
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 718,628
<DEPOSITS>                                     520,543
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             11,891
<LONG-TERM>                                     49,478
<COMMON>                                            95
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     136,621
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 718,628
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 17,390
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,814
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   468
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                20,672
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               9,386
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,745
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,927
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      360
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   2
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 12,421
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,379)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        (855)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (855)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.61
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,803
<LOANS-PAST>                                         3
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,335
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,533
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      350
<RECOVERIES>                                       152
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,695
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,102
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            593
        

</TABLE>
### SERVE D MARC H 31 , 201 0

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C IN TH EMATTE RO F 

### RAYMOND H . FESSLE R FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10WP000 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S No . FAA-2010-002 0 

### DEFIOFIBANSPOiMiO N

> 3 0



### ORDE R Bot hpartie s hav e submitte dthei r respectiv e position s o n Venue . WHEREFORE , th e submission s havin g bee n readan dconsidere di t b e an di s hereb y ORDERE D a s follows : Venu e shal l b e Pocatell o o r Boise , ID dependin g o n th e availability o f court facilties .

Richar dC . Goodwi n U.S . Administrativ e Law Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No . CP10WP000 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W.* ^ Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suite 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Eri c A , Seitz , Respondent' s Attorne y 82 0 Mililan i Street , Suit e 71 4 Honolulu , H I 9681 3 TEL : 808-533-743 4 Christophe r

I . Merrill , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l Western-Pacifi c Region , AWP- 7 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 9200 7 Lo s Angeles, C A 90009-200 7 TEL : 310-725-710 5 FAX : 310-725-681 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r

202-366-213 9 Legal Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Hearin g Docket , Federa l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Buildin g - Roo m 2014, Washington

, D C 20591 , Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430.
§ 133.140 Stowage of rescue boats. ( a ) Rescue boats must be stowed as follows: ( 1 ) Each rescue boat must be ready for launching in not more than 5 minutes.
( 2 ) Each rescue boat must be in a position suitable for launching and recovery.
( 3 ) Each rescue boat must be stowed in a way that neither the rescue boat nor its stowage arrangements will interfere with the operation of any survival craft at any other launching station.
( b ) Each rescue boat must be provided a means for recharging the rescue boat batteries from the OSV's power supply at a supply voltage not exceeding 50 volts.
( c ) Each inflated rescue boat must be kept fully inflated at all times.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Achillion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Mary Kay Fenton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 7, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Mary Kay Fenton    
|                   |  |  |  | Mary Kay Fenton        
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 131.893 Watertight doors and watertight hatches.

Each watertight door in a bulkhead that must be watertight in compliance with the requirements in part 174 of this chapter, and each watertight hatch, must be marked on both sides in letters at least 50 millimeters (2 inches) high that state the following: “WATERTIGHT DOOR—KEEP CLOSED EXCEPT FOR PASSAGE” or “WATERTIGHT HATCH—KEEP CLOSED WHEN NOT IN USE”.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

GENELLE TRISCHLER,

Case No. 14-12867

Plaintiff,

Paul D. Borman

United States District Judge

v.

Patricia T. Morris

United States Magistrate Judge

COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S AMENDED REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 16);

(2) GRANTING DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 14); 

(3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 12)

On June 30, 2015, Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris issued a Report and

Recommendation addressing the cross motions for summary judgment in this action. (ECF No.

15, Report and Recommendation; ECF No. 15, Amended Report and Recommendation).1

 In the

Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that this Court grant Defendant

Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment and deny Plaintiff’s motion for summary

judgment. 

Having thoroughly reviewed the Report and Recommendation and there being no timely

objections from either party pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the

Court will adopt the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.

1

 The Magistrate Judge then issued an Amended Report and Recommendation on August

19, 2015 to correct a mistype on the first page of the Report but did not alter the Report and

Recommendation in any other way. (ECF No. 16). 

2:14-cv-12867-PDB-PTM Doc # 17 Filed 08/24/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 951
Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Amended Report and

Recommendation (ECF No. 16), GRANTS Defendant Commissioner’s Motion for Summary

Judgment (ECF No. 14), DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF. No. 12), and

DISMISSES this action with PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Paul D. Borman 

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: August 24, 2015

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party

of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on August 24, 2015.

s/Deborah Tofil 

Case Manager

2

2:14-cv-12867-PDB-PTM Doc # 17 Filed 08/24/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 952
EPA CLIMATE CHANGE TESTIMONY, 

C~ 

MAYA JEFFERSON, 

7/29/14 

MY NAME IS MYA JEFFERSON AND I AM A STUDENT AT THE SAUL AGRICULTURAL 

C'Iy:LePlv(Lima:III_\Q07:IIe~ 

INITIALLY I WANT TO THANK PRESIDENT OBAMA FOR TAKING ACTION TO 

PROTECT OUR FUTURE. REDUCING CARBON EMISSIONS THROUGH HIS CLIMATE 

ACTION PLAN AND HIS ENCOURGAING CLEAN ENERGY OFFERS A PROMISING 

DIRECTION FOR THE FUTURE. 

AS A YOUNG PERSON I WANT CLEAN AIR, CLEAN WATER AND CLEAN LANDS. 

I WANT CLEAN GREEN JOBS, AND GREEN TECHNOLOGICAL CAREERS TO DECEASE 

UNEMPLOYMENT WHILE PROTECTING THE ENVIROMENT. 

I WANT A FUTURE THAT IS SUSTAINABLE. MY GENERATION DID NOT CREATE THIS 

PROBLEM BUT WITH YOUR SUPPORT WE CAN BE PART OF THE SOLUTION . 

THANK YOU
§ 129.315 Power sources for OSVs. ( a ) The requirements of this section apply to OSVs between 100 GRT and 500 GRT or less than 6,000 GT ITC instead of those in subpart 111.10 of this chapter.
( b ) If a generator provides electrical power for any system identified as a vital system by § 128.130(a) of this subchapter, at least two power-generating sets must be provided. At least one set must be independent of the main propulsion plant. A generator not independent of the main propulsion plant must comply with § 111.10-4(d) of this chapter. With any one generating set stopped, the remaining set or sets must provide the power necessary for the loads required by this section.
[CGD 82-004 and CGD 86-074, 62 FR 49332, Sept. 19, 1997, as amended by USCG-2012-0208, 79 FR 48937, Aug. 18, 2014]
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.077-7 Procedure for approval of design or material revision. ( a ) Each change in design, material, or construction of an approved PFD must be approved by the Commandant before being used in any production of PFDs.
( b ) Determinations of equivalence of design, construction, and materials may be made only by the Commandant.
[CGD 78-174, 60 FR 2492, Jan. 9, 1995]
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b)
      AND 15d-14(b)**




**(Section 906
      Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002)**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of International Imaging Systems, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      John Vogel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
      and belief:





(1) the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of the operation of the
      Company.








/s/ *John Vogel*


John
      Vogel


Chief
      Executive Officer


International
      Imaging Systems, Inc.





This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
      of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
BRENTWOOD^ 

-TRAVEL ' 

February 24, 2010 :}-^T QFl;--.PORTAIION 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary , i •••if; 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Wasiiington, D.C. 20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

As a dedicated travel partner of American Airlines, I am writing in support of American's 

application to provide new service from New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport 

and Lbs Ahgeles International Airport to Tokyo International Airport at Haneda. 

I recognize, and applaud you and the Obama administration for your success last December 

in reaching a landmark Open Skies agreement with Japan, which opens up Haneda to 

service by U.S. airlines. 

1 encourage your selection of American Airlines to provide nonstop service from New York 

and Los Angeles to Haneda in order to provide an essential connection between three of the 

world's largest financial and commerce centers. 

Recent events, including the successful preservation of Japan Airlines' oneworld Alliance 

membership, have underscored American's strong commitment to the trans-Pacific market. 

American is likewise committed to New York and Los Angeles - both vital focal points of 

business, trade, entertainment, technology and education - providing unsurpassed air 

service since the mid-1900s 

Both the New York and Los Angeles metro areas will gain significant economic benefits from 

these proposed new flights, as will American's customers and employees. However, we 

need your help to make the JFK & LAX/Haneda connection a reality. 

Therefore, I strongly urge you to say yes to American Airlines and its request for slots to fly 

from Kennedy and Los Angeles to Haneda! 

Sincere, 

Stephanie Turner, CTC 

President 

Brentwood Travel 

St. Louis, Missouri
----

Top of pageBeginning of OFR 00-124URL: http://geopubs.wr.usgs.gov/open-file/of00-124/fig1.htmlMaintainer: Susan A. CochranLast modified: 12 Dec 2000
U.S. Department of the Interior,U.S.Geological Survey,Western RegionCoastal and Marine Geology
#### § 108.113 Structural standards.

Except as provided in § 108.109, each unit must meet the structural standards of the American Bureau of Shipping's *Rules for Building and Classing Offshore Mobile Drilling Units, 1978.*
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.625 Design temperature below 0 °C (32 °F) and down to −165 °C (−265 °F).

Pipes, tubes, forgings, castings, bolting, and nuts for cargo and process piping for a design temperature below 0 °C (32 °F) and down to −165 °C (−265 °F) must meet § 56.50-105 of this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         626,675                  23,805
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  433,780                 285,320
<ALLOWANCES>                                    31,838                  14,510
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,111,434                 328,635
<PP&E>                                         329,866                 175,198
<DEPRECIATION>                                  80,131                  58,315
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,813,132               6,953,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          318,734                 147,947
<BONDS>                                        398,915                   2,215
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         8,553                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,897,134               6,295,431
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,813,132               6,953,897
<SALES>                                        473,735                 329,608
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               473,735                 329,608
<CGS>                                          298,574                 212,267
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  298,574                 212,267
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                77,615                  53,462
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,002                   3,391
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,202                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 95,252                  63,855
<INCOME-TAX>                                    47,627                  32,535
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             47,660                  31,442
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    47,660                  31,442
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06                    0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06                    0.04
        

</TABLE>