alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 151.04-3 Initial inspection. ( a ) The initial inspection which may consist of a series of inspections during the construction of an unmanned barge shall include a complete inspection of the structure, auxiliary machinery, and equipment. The inspection shall be such as to insure that the arrangement, materials, and scantlings of the hull structure, tanks and pressure vessels and their appurtenances comply with applicable regulations of this chapter and with the requirements of this part.
( b ) [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.365 Liquid overpressurization protection. ( a ) Except as noted in paragraph (b) of this section, a containment system requiring closed or restricted gauging must: ( 1 ) Be designed to withstand the maximum pressure that develops during an overfill of the densest cargo endorsed for the containment system; or
( 2 ) Have an overflow control system that meets § 153.408; or
( 3 ) Meet the requirements specified by the Commandant (CG-ENG).
( b ) A containment system requiring restricted gauging, except for those cargoes that reference §§ 153.525 or 153.527, may be equipped with a spill valve that: ( 1 ) Meets ASTM F 1271 (incorporated by reference, see § 153.4); and
( 2 ) Limits the maximum pressure during liquid overfill at a specified cargo loading rate to that which the containment system is able to withstand (see §§ 153.294(b) and 152.977(b)).
[CGD 78-128, 47 FR 21208, May 17, 1982, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4782, Feb. 3, 1983; CGD 88-032, 56 FR 35827, July 29, 1991; USCG-2000-7790, 65 FR 58463, Sept. 29, 2000]
**EXHIBIT 31.2**Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) CertificationI, Michael P. Muldowney, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Nextera Enterprises, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablelikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date:August 11, 2006         By: /s/ Michael P. Muldowney           Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer)
Commission for Lawyer 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 10, 2013

No. 04-12-00816-CV

Daniel A. BASS,

Appellant

v.

COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-19911

The Honorable Mollee Bennett Westfall, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed by August 28, 2013. Neither the brief nor a motion 

for extension of time has been filed. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause in 

writing within fifteen days from the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed 

for want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a).

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of September, 2013.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer
     of Belcrest Capital Fund LLC (the "Fund"), that:

(a)  the  quarterly  Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June
     30, 2003 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
     13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund
     for such period.



Date:  August 14 , 2003



                                        /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.
                                        -----------------------
                                        Thomas E. Faust Jr.
                                        Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 13 (Thursday, January 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 3599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1203]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 13 / Thursday, January 20, 2011 / 
Notices

[[Page 3599]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service

Renewal of the Advisory Committee on Biotechnology and 21st 
Century Agriculture

AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary, Research, Education, and 
Economics, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Secretary of Agriculture intends to renew the Advisory 
Committee on Biotechnology and 21st Century Agriculture (AC21) for a 2-
year period.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions should be addressed to 
Michael Schechtman, Designated Federal Official, telephone (202) 720-
3817; fax (202) 690-4265; e-mail michael.schechtman@ars.usda.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Advisory Committee Purpose: USDA supports the responsible 
development and application of biotechnology within the global food and 
agricultural system. Biotechnology intersects many of the policies, 
programs and functions of USDA. The charge for the AC21 is two-fold: To 
examine the long-term impacts of biotechnology on the U.S. food and 
agriculture system and USDA; and to provide guidance to USDA on 
pressing individual issues, identified by the Office of the Secretary, 
related to the application of biotechnology in agriculture. The AC21 
will meet in Washington, DC, up to four (4) times per year.

Catherine Woteki,
Under Secretary for Research, Education, Economics.
[FR Doc. 2011-1203 Filed 1-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
```
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.526 Toxic vapor detectors. ( a ) When Table 1 refers to this section, a tankship must have two toxic vapor detectors, at least one of which must be portable, each able to measure vapor concentrations in the range of the time weighted average (TWA) for the cargo. The portable detector may be a direct reading detector tube instrument. These vapor detectors may be combined with those required by § 153.465.
( b ) When the toxic vapor detectors required by paragraph (a) of this section are not available and the cargo referenced to this section is transferred through a cargo pumproom, the tankship must meet § 153.336(b).
[CGD 78-128, 47 FR 21210, May 17, 1982]
§ 96.10 Prerequisites to obtain block grant funds. ( a ) Except where prescribed elsewhere in this rule or in authorizing legislation, no particular form is required for a State's application or the related submission required by the statute. For the maternal and child health block grant, the application shall be in the form specified by the Secretary, as provided by section 505(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 705(a)).
( b ) The certifications required by the community services, primary care, preventive health and health services, alcohol and drug abuse and mental health services, and low-income home energy assistance block grant statutes to be made by the State's chief executive officer must be made by that individual personally, or by an individual authorized to make such certifications on behalf of the chief executive officer.
( c ) Effective beginning in fiscal year 2001, submission dates for applications under the social service and low-income home energy assistance block grant programs are: ( 1 ) for the social services block grant, States and territories which operate on a Federal fiscal year basis, and make requests for funding from the Department, must insure that their applications (pre-expenditure reports) for funding are submitted by September 1 of the preceding fiscal year unless the Department agrees to a later date. States and territories which operate their social services block grant on a July 1-June 30 basis, must insure that their applications are submitted by June 1 of the preceding funding period unless the Department agrees to a later date.
( 2 ) for the low-income home energy assistance program, States and territories which make requests for funding from the Department must insure that their applications for a fiscal year are submitted by September 1 of the preceding fiscal year unless the Department agrees to a later date.
( d ) Effective beginning in fiscal year 2001, for the low-income home energy assistance program, States and territories which make requests for funding from the Department must insure that all information necessary to complete their applications is received by December 15 of the fiscal year for which they are requesting funds unless the Department agrees to a later date.
[47 FR 29486, July 6, 1982, as amended at 64 FR 55856, Oct. 15, 1999]
# Senate Floor Activity - Monday, March 11, 2024

**

----

## The Journal

## Certain Procedures Dispensed With

## Transaction of Morning Business

## Legislative Business (Monday, March 11)

 S.Res. 586

## Executive Business (Monday, March 11)

 PN1406

85

## Adjournment

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Floor Activity Summaries 

View previous floor activity files.Stream live Senate floor proceedings while a meeting is in progress.View past floor proceedings on CSPAN

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.

### Contact Your Senators 

Follow this guide on how to contact your senators by phone, postal mail, or on the web.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
  with the Quarterly Report of Artificial Life, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
  for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eberhard Schoneburg, chief
  executive officer and chief financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
  to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
  of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                    
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| |     |                                                                                                                                                    
| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:
  May 14, 2010

|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Eberhard
Schoneburg    
|Eberhard
   Schoneburg     
|Chief
Executive Officer and
|Chief
 Financial Officer   

22

---
# C_2011238EN.01000404.xml

| 13.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/4

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București (Romania) lodged on 26 May 2011 — SC Gran Via Moinești srl v Agenția Naționala de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF), Administrația Finanțelor Publice București

(Case C-257/11)

2011/C 238/08

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Curtea de Apel București

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SC Gran Via Moinești Srl

Applicant:

Defendants: Agenția Naționala de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF), Administrația Finanțelor Publice București

Defendants:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | In the light of Articles 167 and 168 of Directive 2006/112/EC (1) of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, can the purchase, by a commercial company liable for VAT, of a number of buildings scheduled for demolition, together with a plot of land, with a view to developing a residential complex on that land constitute a preparatory activity, that is to say, investment expenditure for the purposes of developing a residential complex, entitling that company to deduct the VAT on the purchase of the buildings? |
| --- | --- |

1.

In the light of Articles 167 and 168 of Directive 2006/112/EC (1) of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, can the purchase, by a commercial company liable for VAT, of a number of buildings scheduled for demolition, together with a plot of land, with a view to developing a residential complex on that land constitute a preparatory activity, that is to say, investment expenditure for the purposes of developing a residential complex, entitling that company to deduct the VAT on the purchase of the buildings?

1

| 2. | In the light of Article 185(2) of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, is the demolition of the buildings scheduled for demolition, which were purchased together with the plot of land, with a view to developing a residential complex on the land, subject to adjustment of the VAT on the purchase of the buildings? |
| --- | --- |

2.

In the light of Article 185(2) of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, is the demolition of the buildings scheduled for demolition, which were purchased together with the plot of land, with a view to developing a residential complex on the land, subject to adjustment of the VAT on the purchase of the buildings?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 21st Century
Holding Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Widdicombe, Chief
Executive Officer of 21st Century Holding Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of 21st Century Holding Company.


By:  /s/ Richard A. Widdicombe
------------------------------
Richard A. Widdicombe
Chief Executive Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.1866 Cargo hose connection: Transferring cargo.

No person may transfer cargo through a cargo hose connection unless the connection has the remotely controlled quick closing shut off valve required under § 154.538.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

PATRICIA L. WIESZCIECINSKI, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cv-12728 

v Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

 Magistrate Judge Patricia Morris 

DAVE LABRENZ and KAY COOPER, 

 Defendants. 

__________________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING 

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT SUA SPONTE 

 On July 11, 2014, Plaintiff Patricia Wieszciecinski filed a complaint against Defendants, 

alleging “Wrongful eviction 1 loss of ALL Real property”. Compl. at 2, ECF No. 1. 

Wieszciecinski further alleged that: 

His tenant in #8 is making it hard to live there. She is older and on SSI sheltering 

(3) homeless adults (1) w/child. The husband has flattened 2 of my tires and Kay 

Broke 3 screeens. also sold me a TV $50.00 that belongs to stoled my grill Noisy 

& filthy drugs involved[.] [sic throughout] 

Id. at 3. Wieszciecinski contends that this Court has jurisdiction because the United States 

Government is a Plaintiff in the case. Id. at 5. 

 On August 15, 2014, Magistrate Judge Patricia Morris issued a report recommending that 

Wieszciecinski’s complaint be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Judge Morris 

noted that although “Plaintiff’s purported basis for this court’s jurisdiction is that the U.S. 

Government is a Plaintiff . . . the United States is not a party to this action.” Rep. & Rec. 4, ECF 

No. 13. Moreover, Judge Morris determined that neither federal question jurisdiction nor 

1:14-cv-12728-TLL-PTM Doc # 15 Filed 09/08/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 66
- 2 - 

diversity of citizenship jurisdiction existed. Id. Accordingly, Judge Morris recommended 

dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Id. 

Although the Magistrate Judge’s report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may 

object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, 

neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the 

Magistrate Judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and 

recommendation waives any further right to appeal. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation 

(ECF No. 13) is ADOPTED. 

 It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff Wieszciecinski’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is 

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: September 8, 2014 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each party of record herein by first class U.S. mail on September 

8, 2014. 

 s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

 TRACY A. JACOBS 

1:14-cv-12728-TLL-PTM Doc # 15 Filed 09/08/14 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 67
October 25, 2012 

A.L Muldoon 

Transportation Industry Analyst 

Office Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

RE: Essential Air Service at Fort Wood 

Dear Mr. 

Thank you to the Joint Adv1sory Board to comment on the 

Essential Air Service submitted for air service at the Waynesville-St. Robert Regional Airport at 

Forney located on Fort Leonard Wood. As the civilian sponsors the existing joint use agreement 

on Fort Wood, the continuance of viable air service from the Fort Leonard Wood region is of 

prime concern to the cities Waynesville and St. Robert our regional neighbors. Our commitment 

to ;:1ir service to our communities led to a unique partnership between the cities of Waynesville, St. 

Robert and t-ort Leonard Wood which the format1on of Joint Airport Board. 

on a 

Airport Board unanimously 

D.B.A. lape Air. This board 

agreement with Cape Air as the 

pn·::sentations interested airlines, the Joint 

the service submitted by Hyannis Air Service 

like to see the implementation of a 4 year Essential Air Service 

31rline. 

As part of this recommendation, want to state that we rurrently pleased with the service that 

Capt> Air provides to our comm and their conspicuous edgerness to involved with community 

functions have been able to steadilv increa:>e through an aggressive marketing model 

and a willingness to address posed on a Joint Use airfield. 

On behalf of the and St. thank you for your continued support of the 

Essential Air Service program, 

Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or further input. 

Since~ely,L_ 

'f,P/i 

Tim Mann 

Chairman, Waynesville St. Robert Regional Airport Joint Advisory Board.