NCHS Data Brief ■ No. 24 ■ November 2009

u.s. department of health and human services

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Health Statistics

Born a Bit Too Early: Recent Trends in Late Preterm Births

Joyce A. Martin, M.P.H.; Sharon Kirmeyer, Ph.D.; Michelle Osterman, M.H.S.; and Ruth A. Shepherd, M.D.

Key findings

•	 The U.S. late preterm birth 

rate rose 20% from 1990 

to 2006. If the late preterm 

rate had not risen from the 

1990 level, more than 50,000 

fewer infants would have been 

delivered late preterm in 2006. 

•	 On average, more than 900 

late preterm babies are born 

every day in the United States, 

or a total of one-third of

1 million infants (333,461).

•	 Increases in late preterm 

births are seen for mothers of 

all ages, and for non-Hispanic 

white and Hispanic mothers. 

The rate for black mothers 

declined during the 1990s, 

but has been on the rise since 

2000.

•	 Late preterm birth rates rose 

for all U.S. states, but declined 

in the District of Columbia. 

•	 The percentage of late 

preterm births for which 

labor was induced more than 

doubled from 1990 to 2006; 

the percentage of late preterm 

births delivered by cesarean 

also rose markedly.

The preterm (less than 37 weeks of gestation) birth rate rose by more than 20 

percent in the United States between 1990 and 2006 (1). Most of this increase 

was among infants born toward the end of the preterm period, at 34 to 36 full 

weeks of pregnancy, or during the period known as “late preterm” (1,2). 

Although babies born before the 34th week of pregnancy are at the greatest 

risk of early death and life-long morbidity (3), it is becoming increasingly 

recognized that infants born late preterm are less healthy than infants born 

later in pregnancy (4–9). Late preterm babies are more likely than term babies 

to suffer complications at birth such as respiratory distress (4,9); to require intensive and prolonged hospitalization (4,8); to incur higher medical costs (5); 

to die within the first year of life (3,7,8); and to suffer brain injury that can

result in long-term neurodevelopmental problems (6). Accordingly, increased 

high levels of late preterm births are an important public health issue.

This data brief is on births in singleton deliveries, which make up the bulk of 

all newborns (96.6 percent in 2006).

Keywords: gestational age • state-specific late preterm birth rates

What are the recent trends in late preterm births?

The rate of infants born late preterm rose 20 percent, from 6.8 to 8.1 percent 

from 1990 to 2006 (Figure 1).

Year

Percent

1Late preterm. NOTE: Singleton births only.

SOURCE: CDC/NCHS, National Vital Statistics System.

Figure 1. Birth rates at 34, 35, 36, and total 34 to 36 weeks of gestation:

United States, 1990–2006 

0

2

4

6

8

10

Total 34–36 weeks1

36 weeks

35 weeks

34 weeks

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
NCHS Data Brief ■ No. 24 ■ November 2009

■  2  ■

Put another way, 1 of every 15 babies born in 1990 was delivered late preterm compared with 

about 1 of 12 infants in 2006. 

Rates rose for each gestational week from 34 to 36 weeks, with the largest increases for late 

preterm births delivered at 36 weeks (Figure 1). For the period 1990 to 2006, births at 34 weeks 

increased from 1.3 to 1.4 percent, births at 35 weeks from 2.1 to 2.3 percent, and births delivered 

at 36 weeks from 3.4 to 4.4 percent. 

On average, more than 900 late preterm babies are born every day in the United States; or a total 

of one-third of 1 million (333,461) late preterm infants in 2006. 

If the late preterm birth rate for 2006 were the same as that for 1990, about 50,000 fewer infants 

would have been delivered late preterm in 2006 alone.

Have late preterm births increased among mothers of all ages? 

Late preterm birth rates have risen among mothers of all ages from 1990 to 2006, including teenage mothers (up 5 percent) (Figure 2). 

Among mothers in age groups 25 years and over, late preterm birth rates increased by more than 

20 percent from 1990 to 2006.

Younger (under age 20 years) and older (40 years and over) mothers are the most likely to have a 

late preterm baby.

What are the trends in late preterm birth rates by race and Hispanic origin?

Late preterm births climbed by one-third among non-Hispanic white mothers from 1990 to 2006 

(from 5.5 to 7.4 percent) (Figure 3).

Rates for Hispanic mothers increased, but more modestly, by 11 percent, from 7.4 to 8.2 percent. 

Years of age

Percent

NOTE: Singleton births only.

SOURCE: CDC/NCHS, National Vital Statistics System.

Figure 2. Late preterm birth rates by age of mother: United States, 1990, 2000, and 2006

0

6

7

8

9

10

11

1990 2000 2006

Less than 20 20–24 25–29 30–34 35–39 40 and over

9.1

8.9

9.6

7.1

7.5

8.4

6.0

6.8

7.6

6.0

6.7

7.5

6.9

7.5

8.5

8.0

9.0

10.0
NCHS Data Brief ■ No. 24 ■ November 2009

■  3  ■

Among non-Hispanic black mothers, late preterm birth rates trended downward during much 

of the 1990s, but rose from 2000 to 2006. As a result, there was essentially no change in the 

percentage of non-Hispanic black late preterm births in 1990 (11.1 percent) compared with 2006 

(11.0 percent).

In 2006, non-Hispanic black mothers were about 50 percent more likely than non-Hispanic white 

mothers and one-third more likely than Hispanic mothers to have a late preterm delivery.

Have late preterm births increased in all parts of the country? 

Increases	in	late	preterm	birth	rates	are	seen	across	the	United	States;	rates	rose	significantly	

between 1990–1991 and 2005–2006 for all states (Figure 4). The only area to report a decline was 

the District of Columbia (see table).

Rates increased by 20 percent or more for more than one-half of all states. Among these, rates 

rose	by	30	to	39	percent	in	eight	states,	and	40	percent	or	more	in	five	states.	

For combined years 2005–2006, late preterm birth rates ranged from under 6 percent in Connecticut and Vermont to more than 10 percent in Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi.

Figure 3. Late preterm birth rates by race and Hispanic origin of mother: United States, 1990–2006 tnecreP

Year

NOTE: Singleton births only.

SOURCE: CDC/NCHS, National Vital Statistics System.

12

10

8

6

0

Non-Hispanic black

Hispanic

Non-Hispanic white All births

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

Table. Late preterm singleton birth rates, by state: United States, 1990–1991 and 2005–2006

1990–1991 2005–2006 Percent change 1990–

1991 to 2005–2006

total 6.80 8.11 19

alabama 8.07 10.64 32

alaska 5.98 7.28 22

arizona 6.85 8.92 30

arkansas 8.20 8.93 9

california 6.59 6.87 4

colorado 6.37 7.79 22

connecticut 5.69 5.92 4
NCHS Data Brief ■ No. 24 ■ November 2009

■  4  ■

Table. Late preterm singleton birth rates, by state: United States, 1990–1991 and 2005–2006

1990–1991 2005–2006 Percent change 1990–

1991 to 2005–2006

Delaware 6.99 8.72 25

District of Columbia 11.39 9.62 -16

Florida 7.37 8.85 20

Georgia 7.88 9.18 16

Hawaii 6.79 7.80 15

Idaho 5.77 7.49 30

Illinois 7.24 8.16 13

Indiana 6.29 8.48 35

Iowa 5.65 7.34 30

Kansas 6.24 7.81 25

Kentucky 6.98 9.93 42

Louisiana 8.90 10.44 17

Maine 4.70 6.78 44

Maryland 7.01 8.20 17

Massachusetts 4.75 6.80 43

Michigan 6.74 7.79 16

Minnesota 5.36 6.66 24

Mississippi 9.50 12.23 29

Missouri 7.03 8.36 19

Montana 5.56 7.81 40

Nebraska 5.57 7.68 38

Nevada 7.48 9.31 24

New Hampshire 4.58 6.23 36

New Jersey 6.77 7.44 10

New Mexico 7.15 9.06 27

New York 6.70 7.52 12

North Carolina 7.74 8.54 10

North Dakota 5.60 7.37 32

Ohio 6.73 8.20 22

Oklahoma 6.75 8.80 30

Oregon 5.40 6.73 25

Pennsylvania 6.39 7.17 12

Rhode Island 6.25 7.65 22

South Carolina 7.75 9.72 26

South Dakota 5.87 8.13 39

Tennessee 8.13 9.39 15

Texas 7.41 8.95 21

Utah 5.89 7.61 29

Vermont 4.92 5.70 16

Virginia 6.99 7.66 10

Washington 5.59 6.98 25

West Virginia 6.32 9.63 53

Wisconsin 5.92 7.18 21

Wyoming 7.12 8.57 20
NCHS Data Brief ■ No. 24 ■ November 2009

■  5  ■

Why has the late preterm birth rate increased in recent years? 

Many factors may have contributed to this rise (9). The reasons are not clear; however, we do 

know that the way labor and delivery is managed has also changed over this period. 

Although it is not possible to know whether an infant would be born late preterm if the birth was 

not induced or delivered by cesarean, recent studies suggest that the increasing use of induction of 

NOTE: Singleton births only.

SOURCE: CDC/NCHS, National Vital Statistics System.

Figure 4. Percent change in late preterm rates by state: United States, 1990–1991 and 2005–2006

AK

HI

Increased more than 40.0 percent

Increased 30.0 to 39.9 percent

Increased 20.0 to 29.9 percent

NH

DC

RI

NJ

DE

MD

MA

MS

LA

UT

CA

AZ NM

TX

GA

FL

ID

OR

MT

SD

ND

SC

NV

AL

IA

MN

WI

ME

CT

NE

VA

OH

PA

IL

MI

WA

KS

CO

IN

KY

WV

NC TN

VT

AR OK

NY

MO

WY

NYC

Increased 10.0 to 19.9 percent

Increased less than 9.9 percent

Decreased

Year

Percent

NOTES: Singleton births only. Induction of labor rates are for vaginal births only.

SOURCE: CDC/NCHS, National Vital Statistics System.

Figure 5. Induction of labor and cesarean delivery rates among late preterm births: United States, 1990–2006

0

10

20

30

40

Cesarean

Induced

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
NCHS Data Brief ■ No. 24 ■ November 2009

■  6  ■

labor and cesarean delivery at 34–36 weeks has influenced the upswing in the late preterm birth

rate (10,11).

The percentage of late preterm vaginal births for which labor was induced more than doubled 

between 1990 and 2006, climbing from 7.5 to 17.3 percent (Figure 5). The percentage of late 

preterm births delivered by cesarean also rose substantially, by 46 percent, from 23.5 to 34.3 

percent (Figure 5). 

Summary

The number and rate of babies born just 1 to 3 weeks short of “term” has risen substantially in recent years. This increase has not been offset by a decline in births delivered at less than 34 weeks; 

early term (37 to 39 weeks) births have risen, but births at longer gestations of 40 weeks or more 

have declined. From 1990 to 2006 increases in late preterm singleton births are seen among 

women of all ages, among non-Hispanic white and Hispanic infants (the rate for non-Hispanic 

black births declined during the 1990s, but has been on the rise since 2000), and in all U.S. states 

(except the District of Columbia). The percentages of late preterm births for which labor was 

induced or which were delivered by cesarean have also risen markedly. 

The rise in late preterm births is important because these infants are developmentally and physiologically immature and suffer more health complications and have higher death rates than 

infants born at term (12). Preliminary birth data for 2007 suggest a small decline in the overall 

late preterm birth rate from the 2006 level (from 8.1 to 8.0 percent) (13), but it is too soon to tell 

if this small change represents the beginning of a longer term shift in trends in late preterm births. 

Definitions

Preterm birth rate: The number of births delivered at less than 37 completed weeks of gestation 

per 100 total births.

Late preterm birth rate: The number of births delivered at 34 to 36 completed weeks of gestation 

per 100 total births.

Term births: Births delivered at 37 to 41 completed weeks of gestation.

Multiple birth rate: The number of twin and triplet and higher order multiple births per 1,000 

total births.

Induction of labor: Initiation of uterine contractions by medical or surgical means for the purpose 

of delivery before the spontaneous onset of labor (i.e., before labor has begun).

Cesarean: Extraction of the infant, placenta, and membranes through an incision in the maternal 

abdominal and uterine walls.

Data sources and methods

This report contains data from the Natality Data File from the National Vital Statistics System 

(NVSS). The vital statistics natality file includes information for all births occurring in the United

States. 
NCHS Data Brief ■ No. 24 ■ November 2009

■  7  ■

The natality files include information on a wide range of maternal and infant demographic and

health characteristics for babies born in the United States. Data may also be accessed from the 

interactive data access tool, VitalStats.

This data brief is on births in singleton deliveries, which make up the bulk of all newborns (96.6 

percent in 2006). Births in multiple deliveries are excluded because of the very different gestational age patterns, trends, and birth outcomes of multiple births compared with singletons (1).

The primary measure used to determine gestational age is the interval between the first day of

the mother’s last normal menstrual period (LMP) and the date of birth. The clinical or obstetric 

estimate of gestation is substituted where the LMP is missing or inconsistent with birthweight (1). 

The excess number of 2006 late preterm births for 2006 is calculated by applying the 1990 birth 

rates for individual gestational weeks 34, 35, and 36 to the total number of 2006 singleton births. 

The estimated number of births is then subtracted from the observed or reported number and 

numbers for the individual weeks totaled. 

About the authors

Joyce A. Martin, Sharon Kirmeyer, and Michelle Osterman are with the Centers for Disease 

Control and Prevention’s National Center for Health Statistics, Division of Vital Statistics, Reproductive Statistics Branch. Ruth A. Shepherd, M.D., FAAP, is with the Kentucky Department of 

Health.

References

1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al. Births: Final data for 2006. National vital statistics 

reports; vol 57 no 7. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2008. 

2. Davidoff MJ, Dias T, Damus K, et al. Changes in the gestational age distribution among U.S. 

singleton births: Impact on rates of late preterm birth, 1992 to 2002. Semin Perinatol 30(1):8–15. 

2006.

3. Mathews TJ, MacDorman MF. Infant mortality statistics from the 2005 period linked birth/infant death data set. National vital statistics reports; vol 57 no 2. Hyattsville, MD: National Center 

for Health Statistics. 2008.

4. Arnon S, Dolfin T, Litmanovitz I, et al. Preterm labour at 34–36 weeks of gestation: Should it

be arrested? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 15(3):252–6. 2001.

5. Wang ML, Dorer DJ, Fleming MP, et al. Clinical outcomes of new-term infants. Am Acad 

Pediatr 114(2):372–6. 2004.

6. Adams-Chapman I. Neurodevelopmental outcome of the late preterm infant. Clin Perinatol 

33(4):947–64. 2006.

7. Tomashek KM, Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Davidoff MJ, et al. Differences in mortality between 

late-preterm and term singleton infants in the United States, 1995–2002. Pediatrics 151(5):450–6. 

2007.
NCHS Data Brief ■ No. 24 ■ November 2009

8. Ramachandrappa A, Jain L. Health issues of the late preterm infant. 

Pediatr Clin North Am 56(3):565–77. 2009.

9. Engle WA, Kominiarek MA. Late preterm infants, early term infants and 

timing of elective deliveries. Clin Perinatol 35(2):325–41. 2008.

10. Fuchs K, Wapner R. Elective cesarean section and induction and their 

impact on late preterm births. Clin Perinatol 33(4):793–800. 2006.

11. Bettegowda VR, Dias T, Davidoff MJ, et al. The relationship between 

cesarean delivery and gestational age among U.S. singleton births. Clin 

Perinatol 35(2):309–23. 2008. 

12. Engle WA, Tomashek KM, Wallman C, et al. “Late preterm” infants: A 

population at risk. Pediatrics 120(6):1390–1401. 2007.

13. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: Preliminary data for 2007. 

National vital statistics reports; vol 57 no 12. Hyattsville, MD: National 

Center for Health Statistics. 2009.

Suggested citation

Martin JA, Kirmeyer S, Osterman M, Shepherd RA. Born a bit too early: Recent trends 

in late preterm births. NCHS data brief, no 

24. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for 

Health Statistics. 2009.

Copyright information

All material appearing in this report is in 

the public domain and may be reproduced 

or copied without permission; citation as to 

source, however, is appreciated.

National Center for Health 

Statistics

Edward J. Sondik, Ph.D., Director

Jennifer H. Madans, Ph.D., Associate 

Director for Science

Division of Vital Statistics

Charles J. Rothwell, M.S., Director

U.S. Department of

Health & Human Services

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Center for Health Statistics

3311 Toledo Road

Hyattsville, MD 20782

Official Business

Penalty for Private Use, $300

To receive this publication regularly, contact the 

National Center for Health Statistics by

calling 1–800–232–4636

E-mail: cdcinfo@cdc.gov

Internet: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs

ISSN 1941-4927 (Print ed.)

ISSN 1941-4935 (Online ed.)

CS207710

T35480 (11/2009)

DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 2010–1209

First Class mAIL

Postage & Fees Paid 

CDC/NCHS

Permit No. G-284