alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 55 (Thursday, March 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 13503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1406]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Arthritis and 
Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Loan 
Repayment.
    Date: April 30, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Democracy One, 6701 
Democracy Boulevard, 800, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Charles H. Washabaugh, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, NIAMS/NIH, 6701 Democracy Blvd, Room 
816, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-1501, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 15, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1406 Filed 3-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
Order entered December 22 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00577
- CR DAVID WAYNE CAHILL, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380
- 81088
- 2012



### O RDER
The Court REINSTATE S the appeal. On December 17, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s brief had not been filed. We have now received appellant’s brief, together with an
extensio n motion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the December 17, 2015 order requiring findings.
We GRANT appellant’s December 17, 2015 motion to extend time to file his brief and
ORDER appellant’s brief filed as of the date of thi s order.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
§ 130.330 Charts and nautical publications. ( a ) Except as provided by paragraph (b) or (c) of this section, as appropriate for the intended voyage, each vessel must carry adequate and up-to-date— ( 1 ) Charts of large enough scale to make safe navigation possible;
( 2 ) U.S. Coast Pilot or similar publication;
( 3 ) Coast Guard Light List;
( 4 ) Tide Tables published by the National Ocean Service;
( 5 ) Local Notice or Notices to Mariners; and
( 6 ) Current Tables published by the National Ocean Service, or a river-current publication issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or by a river authority, or both.
( b ) Any vessel may carry, instead of the complete publications listed in paragraph (a) of this section, extracts from them for areas it will transit.
( c ) When operating in foreign waters, a vessel may carry an appropriate foreign equivalent of any item required by paragraph (a) of this section.
# National Former Prisoner of War Recognition Day, 2007

The men and women of the United States Armed Forces have made great sacrifices to defend our Nation. They have triumphed over brutal enemies, liberated continents, and answered the prayers of millions around the globe. On National Former Prisoner of War Recognition Day, we honor the brave individuals who put service above self and were taken captive while protecting America and advancing the cause of freedom. 

Throughout our Nation's conflicts, American prisoners of war have defied ruthless enemies and endured tremendous hardships as they braved captivity. Their strength showed the power and resilience of the American spirit and the indomitable character of our men and women in uniform. Their sacrifices are a great example of courage, devotion, and love of country. 

Our Nation's former prisoners of war have helped secure the priceless gift of freedom for all our citizens, and we will always be grateful to them and their families. On National Former Prisoner of War Recognition Day and throughout the year, we honor the American heroes who have been taken as prisoners of war and remember their legacy of bravery and selflessness. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim April 9, 2007, as National Former Prisoner of War Recognition Day. I call upon the people of the United States to join me in honoring the service and sacrifices of all American prisoners of war. I call upon Federal, State, and local government officials and private organizations to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fifth day of April, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 07-1776

Billing code 3195-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         143,750                 129,099
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  950,987                 531,969
<ALLOWANCES>                                    68,734                  27,318
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,219,217                 732,007
<PP&E>                                       2,485,646                 344,701
<DEPRECIATION>                                 230,677                  94,294
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,399,557              10,450,566
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          622,608                 324,782
<BONDS>                                      3,638,369                 248,238
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        11,157                   8,553
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,670,993               8,655,568
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,399,557              10,450,566
<SALES>                                      2,789,224               1,689,724
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,789,224               1,689,724
<CGS>                                        1,535,456                 973,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,535,465                 973,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               510,725                 219,530
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                15,298                   7,098
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             114,851                   1,881
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                626,612                 495,712
<INCOME-TAX>                                   343,374                 236,956
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            283,238                 258,756
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   283,238                 258,756
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.26                    0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26                    0.30


</TABLE>
# C_2011282EN.01001102.xml

| 24.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/11

---

Action brought on 12 July 2011 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-369/11)

2011/C 282/21

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: E. Montaguti and H. Støvlbæk, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Article 6(3) and Annex II of Directive 91/440/EEC (1), as amended, and with Articles 4(2), 14(2), 4(1), 30(3) and 30(1) of Directive 2001/14/EC (2), the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under those provisions. |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Article 6(3) and Annex II of Directive 91/440/EEC (1), as amended, and with Articles 4(2), 14(2), 4(1), 30(3) and 30(1) of Directive 2001/14/EC (2), the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under those provisions.

1

2

| — | order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission’s complaints concern the independence of the body carrying out essential functions in the matter of access to infrastructure and the imposition of dues for railway access and the powers and autonomy of the body regulating the railway sector.

The Commission argues that the regime governing the exercise by the infrastructure manager of essential functions concerning access to the infrastructure does not provide sufficient guarantees that that manager operates independently of the holding company of the group of which it forms part, which also includes the main railway undertaking on the market.

Moreover, given that it is for the Minister for Transport to determine dues for access to the network, whereas the infrastructure manager can only make a proposal on the matter and has only the operating duty of calculating the dues actually payable by a single railway undertaking, the latter is deprived of an essential management tool, in contrast with the requirement for independent management.

Finally, the necessary full independence of the body for regulating all railway undertakings has not yet been assured, since the staff of the regulatory body consists of officials of the Ministry of Transport and the latter continues to exercise a decisive influence on the holding company of the group which includes the main Italian railway undertaking, and thus also on the latter.

---

(1)  OJ 1991 L 237, p. 25.

1

(2)  OJ 2001 L 75, p. 29.

2

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Cr. No. 14-cr-20446

v.

Hon. Robert H. Cleland

KHALIL HADDAD, 

 

Defendant.

 /

APPLICATION FOR TRAVEL EXPENSES

On July 30, 2014, Khalil Haddad was charged with Government Program

Fraud. See Indictment, R. 1, Pg ID 1-2. On September 4, 2014, Haddad was

found to be indigent and the court appointed the Federal Defender Office pursuant

to the Criminal Justice Act. See Appointment Order, R. 10, Pg ID 18. Mr.

Haddad resides in Buda, Texas. On Monday, December 19th, 2014, Mr. Haddad

will need to be in Court here in the Eastern District of Michigan for a 3:30 p.m.

hearing. Counsel would also like to consult with the defendant for at least one

hour prior to the hearing. As a result, the defendant respectfully requests that this

Honorable Court order the U.S. Marshal to furnish him with non-custodial

transportation to and from Buda, Texas to Detroit, Michigan (round-trip) for

purposes of appearing in Court on Friday, December 19th.

Case 2:14-cr-20446-RHC-RSW ECF No. 19, PageID.38 Filed 12/10/14 Page 1 of 3
Respectfully submitted,

s/Todd Shanker

 Counsel for Khalil Haddad

613 Abbott, 5th floor

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 967-5879

December 9, 2014 email: todd_shanker@fd.org

Case 2:14-cr-20446-RHC-RSW ECF No. 19, PageID.39 Filed 12/10/14 Page 2 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Cr. No. 14-cr-20446

v.

Hon. Robert H. Cleland

KHALIL HADDAD, 

 

Defendant.

 /

ORDER FOR TRAVEL EXPENSES

Upon the application of Defendant, Khalil Haddad, for Travel Expenses,

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4285, and the Court being apprised of Defendant's

indigence; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the U.S. Marshal furnish Defendant

Khalil Haddad with non-custodial transportation to and from Buda, Texas to

Detroit, Michigan (round trip) for purposes of appearing in Court on the afternoon

of Friday, December 19th for consultation with counsel and for a hearing before

the Honorable Judge Robert H. Cleland.

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

 HONORABLE ROBERT H. CLELAND

United States District Judge

Entered: December 10, 2014 

Case 2:14-cr-20446-RHC-RSW ECF No. 19, PageID.40 Filed 12/10/14 Page 3 of 3
§ 140.801 Towing gear. The owner, managing operator, master or officer in charge of a navigational watch of a towing vessel must ensure the following: ( a ) The strength of each component used for securing the towing vessel to the tow and for making up the tow is adequate for its intended service.
( b ) The size, material, and condition of towlines, lines, wires, push gear, cables, and other rigging used for making up a tow or securing the towing vessel to a tow must be appropriate for: ( 1 ) The horsepower or bollard pull of the vessel;
( 2 ) The static loads and dynamic loads expected during the intended service;
( 3 ) The environmental conditions expected during the intended service; and
( 4 ) The likelihood of mechanical damage.
( c ) Emergency procedures related to the tow have been developed and appropriate training provided to the crew for carrying out their emergency duties.
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-135402on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 6, 2009, relating to thefinancial statements of First Federal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc., andthe effectiveness of First Federal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc.’s internalcontrol over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof First Federal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc. for the year ended December 31,2008.

 

 
| /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP |
|-------------------------------|
| Little  Rock, AR              |
| March 6,  2009           |

 

----
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 D0 48 8 . MAHMOUD HAFEZ v . THE STATE.

M ah m o u d Hafez s eek s d i s cret i on ary rev i ew o f t h e t ri al co urt ’ s o rd er d en y i n g

h i s ex t rao rd i n ary m ot i o n fo r n ew t ri al . W e l ack ju ri sd i ct i o n becau s e t h e ap p l i cat i o n

i s u n t i m el y

. An ap p l icat i o n fo r di s cret i o n ary ap p eal m u s t b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s o f t h e

en t ry o f t h e o r d er o r ju d g m en t t o b e ap p eal ed

. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (d ). Th e

req u i rem en t s o f OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 are ju ri s d ict i o n al

, an d t h i s Co urt can no t accep t an

ap p li cat io n fo r ap peal n ot m ad e i n co m p l i an ce t h erewi th

. See Bo yl e v. S t at e , 1 9 0 Ga.

Ap p

. 7 3 4 (3 8 0 SE2 d 5 7 ) (1 9 8 9 ). Here, t he t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er was en t ered o n M ay 1 8,

2 0 1 5

, a n d Hafez fi l ed h i s ap p li cat i o n o n J u n e 2 9

, 2 0 1 5

, wh ich was 4 2 d ay s l at er.

Th erefo re, t h e ap p l i cat i o n i s un t i m el y , an d it i s h ereb y D I S M I S S E D fo r l ack o f

ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 07/27/2015 July 27, 2015
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 1 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 2 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 3 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 4 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 5 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 6 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 7 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 8 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 9 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 10 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 11 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 12 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 13 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 14 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 15 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 16 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 17 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 18 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 19 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 20 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 21 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 22 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 23 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 24 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 25 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 26 of 27
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 1 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 27 of 27
SUNSHINE ACT NOTICES
 

AGENCY: FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M
 

DATE & TIME: THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 3,2011, AT 10:00 A.M. 

PLACE: 999 E STREET, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. (NINTH FLOOR) 

STATUS: THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. 

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 

Correction and Approval of Minutes for January 20, 2011 

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Georgia Federal Elections 

Committee 

Kucinich for President, Inc. -- Statement of Reasons -- Repayment Determination upon 

Administrative Review 

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Kansas Republican Party 

Management and Administrative Matters. 

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language 

interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Shawn Woodhead 

Werth, Commission Secretary, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the 

hearing date. 

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:	 Judith Ingram, Press Officer 

Telephone: (202) 694-1220 

Signed:	 Shawn Woodhead Werth 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission 

Received at the Federal Register: January 26, 2011
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6170

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAVID HILL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1)

Submitted: June 25, 2024 Decided: June 28, 2024

Before RICHARDSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Hill, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6170 Doc: 17 Filed: 06/28/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

David Hill appeals the district court’s order denying, pursuant to a prior prefiling 

injunction, Hill’s request for leave to file a motion for discovery, to submit supplemental 

citations, and for an expedited ruling on previously filed postjudgment motions. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the court’s ruling. Accordingly, we 

affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Hill, No. 1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1 (E.D. 

Va. Jan. 29, 2024). We grant Hill’s motion for leave to file an oversized informal brief, 

but deny Hill’s motion for remand to the district court with instructions to vacate the 

prefiling injunction and adjudicate the postjudgment motions Hill filed prior to imposition 

of the prefiling injunction.

∗

 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗ As to the latter issue, we note that another panel of this court recently issued an 

unpublished opinion denying Hill’s request for mandamus relief as related to those pending 

motions, but encouraged the district court to act as expeditiously as possible in resolving 

the motions. See In re Hill, No. 24-1182, 2024 WL 1715107, at *1 (4th Cir. Apr. 22, 2024). 

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6170 Doc: 17 Filed: 06/28/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Center for Public Integrity, |

|

Plaintiff, |

|

v. | Civil Action No. 17-1162 (CRC)

| ECF

Federal Election Commission, |

|

Defendant. |

PLAINTIFF’S STATEMENT ADDRESSING DEFENDANT’S STATEMENT OF 

MATERIAL FACTS AS TO WHICH THERE IS NO GENUINE DISPUTE

AND PLAINTIFF’S STATEMENT OF GENUINE ISSUES 

Plaintiff does not contest Defendant’s Statement of Material Facts as to Which There Is 

No Genuine Issue except that, to the extent that Defendant’s Statement asserts that Defendant or 

its agents reached certain legal conclusions or determinations, Plaintiff does not necessarily 

agree that those conclusions or determinations are correct.

There exists a genuine issue as to whether the withheld documents contain any 

reasonably segregable nonexempt information. Defendant’s Statement, at ¶ 4, asserts that the

“fourteen pages of responsive emails ... did not contain any reasonably segregable nonexempt 

information, pursuant to FOIA Exemption 5.” The Declaration of Katie A. Higginbotham states, 

at ¶ 6, that “[t]he Administrative Law Team concluded that the remaining 14 pages of documents 

... should not be released pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(5), because the information was covered 

by the deliberative process privilege and did not contain any reasonably segregable non-exempt 

information. The Commission’s Chief FOIA Officer concurred in these determinations.” 

Defendant has not submitted evidence to support these conclusions.

Case 1:17-cv-01162-CRC Document 13-1 Filed 09/28/17 Page 1 of 2
Respectfully submitted,

/S/

Peter Newbatt Smith 

D.C. Bar #458244

Center for Public Integrity

910 17th Street, N.W., 7th Floor

Washington, DC 20006-2606

202-481-1239

psmith@publicintegrity.org

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 1:17-cv-01162-CRC Document 13-1 Filed 09/28/17 Page 2 of 2