alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                     9
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                         0001070517
<NAME>                                        LONG ISLAND FINANCIAL CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                                    U.S. DOLLARS


<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1.000
<CASH>                                        5,721
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                        1,329
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                              0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   121,380
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        339
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          319
<LOANS>                                       134,647
<ALLOWANCE>                                   1,913
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                275,054
<DEPOSITS>                                    208,797
<SHORT-TERM>                                  5,516
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           3,514
<LONG-TERM>                                   39,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      18
<OTHER-SE>                                    18,209
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                275,054
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               5,633
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             5,028
<INTEREST-OTHER>                              23
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              10,684
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            4,208
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            5,691
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         4,993
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                 150
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               4,144
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               1,506
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  1,001
<EPS-BASIC>                                   .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .61
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                3.46
<LOANS-NON>                                   266
<LOANS-PAST>                                  209
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                              0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              1,475
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                 127
<RECOVERIES>                                  415
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             1,913
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          1,913
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                       0





</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Achillion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael D. Kishbauch, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: May 9, 2007 |  | /s/ Michael D. Kishbauch             
|                   |  | Michael D. Kishbauch                 
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
September 4, 2015

Mr. Tim Weston

President

TLW PRODUCTIONS, Inc.

401 Whitney Avenue, Suite 110

Gretna, LA 70056

Dear Mr. Weston:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

§§ 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 

30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We received your June 12, 2015, exemption request on behalf of TLW PRODUCTIONS, Inc. 

filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−2402, but we are unable to process your request any further. 

Your petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to 

consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,965
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,836
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,071
<PP&E>                                          62,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,710
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 742,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,940
<BONDS>                                        401,235
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     199,856
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   742,290
<SALES>                                        116,082
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               116,082
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  107,622
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,548
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,966
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,054)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,425)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,629)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,629)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
### FW: AECC Pettyjohn, Mary to: Bates, Mike, Davis, Anthony , McCorkle, Mark, Rheaume, Thomas, Brown, Derrick , Spencer, Stuart 10/09/2012 10:22 AM

Cc: Guy Donaldson, Dayana Medina, Erik Snyder, Michael Feldman, Joe Kordzi, Barbara Nann
From: "Pettyjohn, Mary" <PETTYJOHN@adeq.state.ar.us> To: "Bates, Mike" <BATES@adeq.state.ar.us>, "Davis, Anthony" <DavisA@adeq.state.ar.us>, "McCorkle, Mark" <MAC@adeq.state.ar.us>, "Rheaume, Thomas" <RHEAUME@adeq.state.ar.us>, "Brown, Derrick" <brownd@adeq.state.ar.us>, "Spencer, Cc: Guy Donaldson/R6/USEPA/US@EPA, Dayana Medina/R6/USEPA/US@EPA, Erik Snyder/R6/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Feldman/R6/USEPA/US@EPA, Joe Kordzi/R6/USEPA/US@EPA, Barbara Nann/R6/USEPA/US@EPA 3 attachments

FYI From: Jacquelyn Barbot [mailto:jbarbot@mwlaw.com] On Behalf Of Walter Wright Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 11:57 AM To: Pettyjohn, Mary Cc: P. E. Curtis Q. Warner (cwarner@aecc.com); Jeremy Jewell; Stephen Cain; MGoldsten@trniityconsultants.com Subject: AECC Dear Ms. Pettyjohn: Please find attached the BART Five Factor Analysis - NOx Analysis for Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation and Bailey and McClellan Generating Stations. Please let me know if you would like this in any other form such as a hard copy/bound, etc. I would be happy to send it in any other form you need. Thanks for your assistance.

Walter [cid:image001.jpg@01CDA54B.D12E38D0] Walter G. Wright, Jr. T 501.688.8839 | C 501.231.8228 | F 501.688.8807 wwright@mwlaw.com<mailto:wwright@mwlaw.com> | MitchellWilliamsLaw.com 425 W. Capitol Ave. | Ste. 1800 | Little Rock, AR 72201 Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.C.

______________________________________________________ IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Any federal tax advice contained in this communication, including attachments and enclosures, is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein. Confidentiality Notice: This electronic mail transmission and any attachment may constitute an attorney-client communication that is privileged at law. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying it, and notify the sender by reply e-mail or by calling (501) 688-8800 Little Rock, AR (479) 464-5650 Rogers, AR (512) 480-5100 Austin, TX or (212) 292-4884 New York, NY, so that our address record can be corrected.

_____________________________________________________

_
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.447 Allowable stress.

(a) An independent tank type B designed from bodies of revolution must have allowable stresses[3] determined by the following formulae:

σm≤f

σL≤1.5 f

σb≤1.5 F

σL + σb≤1.5 F

σm + σb≤1.5 F

where:

σm = equivalent primary general membrane stress[4]

σL = equivalent primary local membrane stress4

σb = equivalent primary bending stress4

f = the lesser of (σB/A) or (σY/B)

F = the lesser of (σB/C) or (σY/D)

A, B, C, and D = stress factors in Table 2.

[4] See Appendix A for equivalent stress.

| | Nickel steel and carbon manganese steel values | Austenitic steel values | Aluminum alloy values |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Stress factors: | | | |
| A | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| B | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| C | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| D | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |

Table 2—Values for Stress Factors

(b) An independent tank type B designed from plane surfaces must have allowable stresses specially approved by the Commandant (CG-ENG).

[CGD 74-289, 44 FR 26009, May 3, 1979, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4782, Feb. 3, 1983]

###### Footnotes -
  154.447

[3] See Appendix B for stress analyses definitions.
§ 112.45-1 Visible indicators. There must be visible indicators in the machinery space to show; ( a ) When an emergency battery is discharging; and
( b ) When the automatically controlled emergency power source is supplying the emergency loads.
- 2616
- 2617
- 2618
Editorial Note on Part 107
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59780, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 107.205 Alternate compliance. ( a ) In place of compliance with other applicable provisions of this subchapter, the owner or operator of a vessel subject to plan review and inspection under this subchapter for initial issuance or renewal of a Certificate of Inspection may comply with the Alternate Compliance Program provisions of part 8 of this chapter.
( b ) For the purposes of this section, a list of authorized classification societies, including information for ordering copies of approved classification society rules and supplements, is available at Coast Guard Headquarters. Contact Commandant (CG-ENG), Attn: Office of Design and Engineering Systems, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509; telephone 202-372-1372 or fax 202-372-1925. Approved classification society rules and supplements are incorporated by reference into 46 CFR 8.110(b).
[CGD 95-010, 62 FR 67536, Dec. 24, 1997, as amended by USCG-1999-5004, 64 FR 30439, June 8, 1999; USCG-2004-18884, 69 FR 58348, Sept. 30, 2004; USCG-2006-25697, 71 FR 55746, Sept. 25, 2006; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49233, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60151, Sept. 30, 2013]
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.077-6 Approval procedures. ( a ) *General.* Subpart 159.005 of this chapter contains the approval procedures. Those procedures must be followed, excepted as modified in this paragraph. ( 1 ) Preapproval review under §§ 159.005-5 and 159.005-7 may be omitted if a similar design has already been approved.
( 2 ) The information required in all three subparagraphs of § 159.005-5(a)(2) must be included in the application.
( 3 ) The application must also include the following: ( i ) The type of performance (i.e. Donned Type I, Type II or Type III) that the PFD is designed to provide.
( ii ) Any special purpose(s) for which the PFD is designed and the vessel(s) or type(s) of vessel on which its use is planned.
( iii ) Buoyancy and torque tolerances to be allowed in production.
( iv ) The text of any optional marking to be provided in addition to required text.
( v ) The manual required by § 160.077-29 (UL 1517 text may be omitted in this submission).
( vi ) The size range of wearers that the device is intended to fit.
( 4 ) The description of quality control procedures required by § 159.005-9 of this chapter to be submitted with the test report may be omitted as long as the manufacturer's planned quality control procedures comply with § 160.077-23.
( b ) *Waiver of tests.* If a manufacturer requests that any test in this subpart be waived, one of the following must be provided to the Commandant as justification for the waiver: ( 1 ) Acceptable test results on a PFD of sufficiently similar design.
( 2 ) Engineering analysis showing that the test is not applicable to the particular design or that by design or construction the PFD cannot fail the test.
( c ) *Alternative Requirements.* A PFD that does not meet requirements in this subpart may still be approved if the device— ( 1 ) Meets other requirements prescribed by the Commandant in place of or in addition to requirements in this subpart; and
( 2 ) Provides at least the same degree of safety provided by other PFD's that do comply with this subpart.
[CGD 78-174, 50 FR 33928, Aug. 22, 1985, as amended by CGD 78-174A, 51 FR 4351, Feb. 4, 1986. Redesignated and amended by CGD 78-174, 60 FR 2491, Jan. 9, 1995]
# C_2016048EN.01009801.xml

| 8.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/98 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/98

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 18 December 2015 — De Nicola v EIB

(Case F-128/11) (1)

1

((Civil Service - EIB staff - Appraisal - 2010 staff report - Contested - Internal procedures - Conditions - Withdrawal - Action - Lack of locus standi - Reasonable time - Failure to comply - Manifestly inadmissible))

(2016/C 048/112)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Isola, laywer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: G. Nuvoli and T. Gilliams, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application seeking, firstly, annulment of the e-mail messages and decisions of the EIB concerning the administrative procedure relating to the applicant’s performance appraisal for 2010, secondly, annulment of the decision whereby the President of the EIB refused to instigate the settlement procedure before the Conciliation Board, thirdly, annulment of the applicant’s annual appraisal for 2010 in so far as it does not award him ‘exceptional performance’ or ‘very good performance’ and does not propose his promotion to Function D and, finally, an order that the EIB pay compensation for the material and non-material damage sustained.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr De Nicola shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Investment Bank. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr De Nicola shall bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Investment Bank.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 3.3.2012, p. 21.

1

---
# C_2013046EN.01002801.xml

| 16.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/28

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 20 November 2012 — Ghiba v Commission

(Case F-10/11) (1)

1

(Civil service - Internal competition - Non-admission to participate in a competition - Eligibility conditions - Concept of services attached to the Commission)

2013/C 46/52

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dorina Maria Ghiba (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially B. Eggers and P. Pecho, acting as Agents, then B. Eggers, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and J. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Civil service — Annulment of the decision of the selection board for competition COM/INT/EU2/AST3 to reject the applicant’s candidature on the ground that it did not meet the eligibility requirements stipulated in the notice of competition.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mrs Ghiba to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mrs Ghiba to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 26.3.2011, p. 14.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2
------------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of Zomex  Distribution,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Peter Buckley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Peter Buckley
-----------------------
Peter Buckley
Chief Financial Officer


November 29, 2004
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Peter E. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of Saba Software, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certify, as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. 

 

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

 

Date: April 14, 2005
#### § 2555.200 Application.

Except as provided in §§ 2555.205 through 2555.235(a), these Title IX regulations apply to every recipient and to each education program or activity operated by such recipient that receives Federal financial assistance.
Editorial Note on Part 162
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 162.039-8 Termination of listing or labeling. ( a ) Listing or labeling as a marine type semiportable fire extinguisher acceptable to the Commandant as approved for use on inspected vessels or motorboats may be terminated, withdrawn, canceled, or suspended by written notice to the recognized laboratory from the Commandant, or by written notice to the manufacturer from the recognized laboratory or from the Commandant under the following conditions: ( 1 ) When the manufacturer does not desire to retain the service.
( 2 ) When the listed product is no longer being manufactured.
( 3 ) When the manufacturer's own program does not provide suitable assurance of the quality of the listed or labeled product being manufactured.
( 4 ) When the product manufactured no longer conforms to the current applicable requirements.
( b ) [Reserved]