alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.1101 Procedures for getting a Surveyor: Approval of Surveyors. ( a ) At least 24 hours before a Surveyor is needed, the person wishing the services of a Surveyor must contact the Captain of the Port or the Sector Office that has jurisdiction over the port at which the Surveyor will be needed to— ( 1 ) Arrange for the Coast Guard to provide a Surveyor; or
( 2 ) Inform the Coast Guard of the selection of a Surveyor from one of the organizations accepted by the Coast Guard to provide Surveyors.
( b ) Organizations may be accepted by the Coast Guard to provide Surveyors if they— ( 1 ) Are engaged, as a regular part of their business, in performing inspections or tests of bulk liquid cargo tanks or bulk liquid cargo handling equipment;
( 2 ) Are familiar with the references in § 153.0(b) and with the requirements of this part;
( 3 ) Are not controlled by the owners or operators of ships needing the services of the Surveyors or the facilities at which those ships would unload cargo;
( 4 ) Are not dependent on Coast Guard acceptance under this section to remain in business; and
( 5 ) Sign a Memorandum of Understanding with the Coast Guard.
( c ) Each application for acceptance as a Surveyor must be submitted to the Commandant (CG-ENG) and must contain the following: ( 1 ) The name and address of the organization, including subsidiaries and divisions, requesting acceptance by the Coast Guard to provide Surveyors.
( 2 ) A statement that the organization is not controlled by the owners or operators of ships needing the services of Surveyors or the facilities at which these ships would unload, or a full disclosure of any ownership or controlling interest held by such parties.
( 3 ) A description of the experience and qualifications of the personnel who would be performing the function of Surveyor.
( 4 ) A statement that the persons who will be performing the function of Surveyor have been trained in and are familiar with the requirements of Annex II and the regulations in this part.
( 5 ) A statement that the Coast Guard may verify the information submitted in the application and may examine the persons who will be performing the function of Surveyor to determine their qualifications.
( d ) The acceptance of an organization may be terminated by the Commandant if the organization fails to properly perform or supervise the inspections required in this part.
[CGD 81-101, 52 FR 7785, Mar. 12, 1987, as amended by USCG-2006-25556, 72 FR 36330, July 2, 2007]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Advisory Committee on CARES Business Plan Studies has scheduled a meeting for April 10, 2007 at the Canandaigua VA Medical Center, Building 5, Auditorium, 40 Fort Hill Avenue, Canandaigua, New York. The meeting will convene at 1 p.m. and conclude at 4 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on proposed business plans at those VA facility sites identified in May 2004 as requiring further study by the Capital Asset Realignment for Enhanced Services (CARES) Decision document.

The objective of the meeting is to provide the Secretary with advice regarding the final selection of a business planning option to modernize the medial center from those options previously selected by the Secretary for further study. An analysis of the business planning options completed by the VA contractor will be presented for Committee review in preparation for submitting the Committee's final recommendations to VA. The agenda will also accommodate public commentary on the options.

                    Interested persons may attend and present oral or written statements to the Committee. For additional information regarding the meeting, please contact Mr. Jay Halpern, Designated Federal Officer, (00CARES), at 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, by phone at (202) 273-5994, or by e-mal at                     *jay.halpern@hq.med.va.gov.*

Dated: March 16, 2007.

By direction of the Secretary.

E. Philip Riggin,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-1428 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
#### Felicite S. Riddle, Respondent, *v.*Bernarr A.Macfadden, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.

Reported below, 130 App. Div. 898.

(Argued January 3, 1910;

decided January 11, 1910.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 9, 1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for the unauthorized publication of plaintiff’s portrait.

The motion was made upon the ground that the appeal was not taken within the time required by law.

*Rufus L. Weaver*for motion.

*Paris S. Russell*opposed.

Motion denied, without costs, but without prejudice to an application on the argument to dismiss the appeal for lack of permission.
#### Schofield v. McGregor.

Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment in favor of defendant, entered upon the verdict of a jury.

The action was brought in Dutchess county by Frederick K. Schofield and others, comprising the board of education of school district No. 3 of the town of Fishkill, against John McGregor, for a breach of contract.

*Anthony & Losey,*for appellants.

*H. H. Hustis,*for respondent.

Talcott, J.

The jury found as a fact that there was no breach of the contract on the part of defendant, and the verdict was sustained. No question of law was involved.

*Judgment affirmed.*
#### ELMER YEAGER ET UX., PLAINTIFFS, v. ATLANTIC CITY AND SHORE RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT.

Decided November 8, 1929.

Before Gummeke, Chief Justice, and Justices Kalisch and Campbell.

Por the rule, *Bourgeois & Coulomb.*

*Contra, Samuel Morris.*

*1001Pee Curiam.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs, Elmer Yeager and Laura Yeager, his wife, to recover compensation for damages sustained by them, when the defendant’s trolley car crashed into the rear of the husband’s automobile, in which they were riding. The jury brought in a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, awarding the husband $2,000 and the wife $500.

The only ground upon which we are asked to set aside these awards is that they were plainly excessive. Our examination of the testimony relating to the character of the injuries received by the respective plaintiffs, the medical expenses incurred by the husband by reason thereof, the loss of wages by the husband, and the cost of repairing his automobile satisfies us that the award to him was a reasonable one. The character of the injuries received by the wife in the collision justified the award made to her, in our opinion.

The rule to show cause will be discharged.
###### Editorial Note on Part 160

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 160.077-17 Construction and Performance—Type I and Commercial Hybrid PFD.

(a) *General.* Each commercial hybrid PFD must meet—

(1) Paragraph (b) of this section; and

(2) Section 160.077-15, except § 160.077-15(a)(2)(iii) and § 160.077-15(c)(1)(i).

(b) *Additional requirements.* Each commercial hybrid PFD must—

(1) Be able to pass the tests in § 160.077-21;

(2) Not present a snag hazard when properly worn;

(3) When worn inflated, have a visible external surface area of at least 1300 sq. cm (200 sq. in.) in front and 450 sq. cm (70 sq. in.) in back that are primarily vivid reddish orange as defined by sections 13 and 14 of the “Color Names Dictionary”;

(4) Have at least one inflation chamber, except that a hybrid PFD approved as a SOLAS lifejacket must have at least two inflation chambers;

(5) Have at least one manual inflation mechanism.

(6) Have at least one automatic inflation mechanism that inflates at least one chamber; and

(7) Not require second stage donning after inflation.

(8) If approved for adults, be universally sized as specified in § 160.077-15(b)(7).

(9) Commercial hybrid PFDs employing closures with less than 1600 N (360 lb) strength, must have at least two closures that meet UL 1517, Section 22.1.

(10) Each commercial hybrid PFD must have an attachment for a PFD light securely fastened to the front shoulder area. The location should be such that if the light is attached it will not damage or impair the performance of the PFD.

(11) In the deflated and the inflated condition, provide buoyancies of at least the values in Table 160.077-17(b)(11).

| | Adult | Youth | Small child |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Inherent buoyancy (deflated condition): | | | |
| Type I | 70 N (15.5 lb) | 50 N (11 lb) | 40 N (9 lb) |
| Type V | 60 N (13 lb) | 34 N (7.5 lb) | N/A |
| Total buoyancy (inflated condition): | | | |
| Type I | 130 N (30 lb) | 80 N (18 lb) | 67 N (15 lb) |
| Type V | 100 N (22 lb) | 67 N (15 lb) | N/A |

Table 160.077-17(b)(11)—Minimum Buoyancy of Type I and Commercial Hybrid PFDs

[CGD 78-174, 50 FR 33928, Aug. 22, 1985, as amended by CGD 78-174, 60 FR 2487, Jan. 9, 1995]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LARRY MAZE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 281 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LARRY MAZE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 282 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LARRY MAZE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 283 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of July, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of First Federal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc. (the “Registrant”)on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

a)              TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

b)             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of and forthe period covered by the Report.

 

 
|   | /s/Larry J. Brandt                |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|   | Larry J. Brandt                   |
|   | President/Chief Executive Officer |

 

Date: February 28, 2005

 

----
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

Civil Action No.

2:14-cv-14-13710

Hon. SEAN F. COX

v.

R.G. & G.R. HARRIS FUNERAL 

HOMES, INC.,

Defendant.

__________________________________________________________________

DEFENDANT R.G. & G.R. HARRIS FUNERAL 

HOMES, INC'S., PRELIMINARY LAY

WITNESS LIST

NOW COMES the Defendant, R.G. & G.R. HARRIS FUNERAL HOMES, 

INC, by and through its attorney, KIRKPATRICK LAW OFFICES, P.C., and for its 

Preliminary Lay Witness List state as follows:

1. Thomas F. Rost

2. Ms. Dolores Nemeth

3. Ryan Kish

4. Shannon Kish

5. Troy Shaffer

6. Cody Higley

7. Tia Macklin

8. Individual known to Defendant as Anthony Stephens

9. Steven Rost

2:14-cv-13710-SFC-DRG Doc # 31 Filed 09/01/15 Pg 1 of 4 Pg ID 381
2

10. Donna Stephens

11. George Crawford

12. Any medical personnel that treated Stephens, including but not limited to any 

doctor, psychologist, psychiatrist, health care professional, and any person who have

evaluated, assessed or treated Stephens

13. Cecelia M. Hanchon, LMSW 

14. REPRESENTATIVES, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES, AND/OR RECORDS 

CUSTODIANS

OF R.G. & G.R. HARRIS FUNERAL HOMES, INC. 

15. Jason Wright

16. Shajini Khan

17. Family members of Stephens

18. Any witnesses identified by Plaintiff in response to any outstanding or future 

discovery requests

19. All witnesses listed on Plaintiff’s Witness List.

20. All persons identified by the parties in their deposition transcripts and answers 

to interrogatories.

21. Any necessary rebuttal witnesses.

22. Plaintiff reserves the right to list any additional witnesses as may become 

known through future discovery. 

Respectfully submitted,

JOEL J. KIRKPATRICK, P.C.

/s/ Joel J. Kirkpatrick

Joel J. Kirkpatrick

Attorney for Appellant

2:14-cv-13710-SFC-DRG Doc # 31 Filed 09/01/15 Pg 2 of 4 Pg ID 382
3

843 Penniman Ave. Suite 201

Plymouth, MI 48170

(734) 404 – 5710

(866) 241-4152 FAX

joel@joelkirkpatrick.com

Dated: September 1, 2015

2:14-cv-13710-SFC-DRG Doc # 31 Filed 09/01/15 Pg 3 of 4 Pg ID 383
4

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on September 1. 2015, a copy of the above filing was filed electronically via 

the ECF filing system. Notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court’s 

electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court’s system.

/s/ Joel J. Kirkpatrick

 JOEL J. KIRKPATRICK

2:14-cv-13710-SFC-DRG Doc # 31 Filed 09/01/15 Pg 4 of 4 Pg ID 384
§ 127.120 Procedure for submittal of plans. If a vessel is to be constructed, altered, or repaired, the plans, information, and calculations required by this part must be submitted— ( a ) To the OCMI in the zone where the vessel is to be constructed, altered, or repaired; or
( b ) By visitors to the Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center, U.S. Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593, or by mail to: Commanding Officer (MSC), Attn: Marine Safety Center, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7430, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7430, in a written or electronic format. Information for submitting the VSP electronically can be found at *http://www.uscg.mil/HQ/MSC .*
[USCG-2007-29018, 72 FR 53966, Sept. 21, 2007, as amended by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60154, Sept. 30, 2013; USCG-2016-0498, 82 FR 35092, July 28, 2017]
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OR 15d-14 OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
David Lazzarato, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

|Dated: August 11, 2005. |  |     |                                                                                                  
|----------------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | By: | /s/DAVID LAZZARATOName: David Lazzarato
Title: Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
# C_2011331EN.01001203.xml

| 12.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/12

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Dâmbovița — Secția civilă (Romania) lodged on 5 September 2011 — Victor Cozman v Teatrul Municipal Târgoviște

(Case C-462/11)

2011/C 331/21

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunalul Dâmbovița

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Victor Cozman

Applicant:

Defendant: Teatrul Municipal Târgoviște

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Article 1 of the First Additional Protocol to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms be interpreted as allowing the salaries of staff paid from public funds to be reduced by 25 %, pursuant to Article 1(1) of Law No 118/2010 laying down certain measures necessary to restore budgetary balance? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Article 1 of the First Additional Protocol to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms be interpreted as allowing the salaries of staff paid from public funds to be reduced by 25 %, pursuant to Article 1(1) of Law No 118/2010 laying down certain measures necessary to restore budgetary balance?

| 2. | If the answer is in the affirmative, is entitlement to salary an absolute right which the State may not make subject to any limitations? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer is in the affirmative, is entitlement to salary an absolute right which the State may not make subject to any limitations?

---
EXHIBIT 12

LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

COMPUTATION OF DEFICIENCY OF EARNINGS TO COVER COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS AND RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS (DOLLARS IN
MILLIONS) (UNAUDITED)

|                                                                                                 |  |  |  | FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, |       
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------------- | ------
|
|Income (loss)
from continuing operations before income taxes and losses from equity investments  |  |  |  | $                                 | (1,002
|Less:
interest capitalized during the period                                                     |  |  |  |                                   |      
|Add: Fixed
charges                                                                               |  |  |  |                                   | 461   
|Total
earnings (loss) to cover fixed charges                                                     |  |  |  |                                   | (541  
|Fixed
charges:                                                                                   |  |  |  |                                   |       
|Total
interest expense including capitalized interest                                            |  |  |  |                                   | 353   
|Interest
portion of rental expenses                                                              |  |  |  |                                   | 108   
|Total fixed
charges                                                                              |  |  |  |                                   | 461   
|Preferred
stock dividends and accretion                                                          |  |  |  |                                   | 103   
|Ratio of
earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividend requirements            |  |  |  |                                   |      
|Deficiency of
earnings to cover combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividend requirements |  |  |  | $                                 | 1,105 



Fixed charges consist of
interest expense on all indebtedness and that portion of operating lease rental expense that is representative of the interest factor. Preferred stock
dividend requirements consist of the amount of pre-tax earnings that is required to pay the dividends on outstanding preferred
stock.


---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2219 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2219

 To amend the Law Enforcement Pay Equity Act of 2000 to permit certain 
annuitants of the retirement programs of the United States Park Police 
  and United States Secret Service Uniformed Division to receive the 
    adjustments in pension benefits to which such annuitants would 
 otherwise be entitled as a result of the conversion of members of the 
 United States Park Police and United States Secret Service Uniformed 
  Division to a new salary schedule under the amendments made by such 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2009

 Mr. Platts (for himself and Mr. Van Hollen) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Law Enforcement Pay Equity Act of 2000 to permit certain 
annuitants of the retirement programs of the United States Park Police 
  and United States Secret Service Uniformed Division to receive the 
    adjustments in pension benefits to which such annuitants would 
 otherwise be entitled as a result of the conversion of members of the 
 United States Park Police and United States Secret Service Uniformed 
  Division to a new salary schedule under the amendments made by such 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Law Enforcement Pension 
Adjustment Equity Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. PERMITTING ADJUSTMENTS IN PENSION BENEFITS FOR UNITED STATES 
              PARK POLICE AND UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE UNIFORMED 
              DIVISION ANNUITANTS FOR PAYMENTS MADE IN 2007 AND 
              SUBSEQUENT YEARS.

    (a) In General.--Section 905(f) of the Law Enforcement Pay Equity 
Act of 2000 (sec. 5-561.02(f), D.C. Official Code) is amended by 
striking the period at the end and inserting the following: ``, for any 
payment made prior to January 1, 2009.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of the Law Enforcement Pay 
Equity Act of 2000.
                                 <all>
```