alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.112-3 Testing, marking, and inspection requirements. ( a ) Interior Finishes (Bulkheads and ceiling finishes) for SOLAS vessels submitted for type approval must be tested for surface flammability in Annex 1, Part 5, and the smoke density and toxicity criteria of Annex 1, Part 2, of the FTP Code (incorporated by reference, see § 164.112-2).
( b ) All testing and inspections required by this subpart must be performed by an independent laboratory accepted by the Coast Guard under subpart 159.010 of this chapter. A list of independent laboratories accepted as meeting subpart 159.010 of this chapter is available online at *http://psix.uscg.mil/EQLabs/Default.aspx*.
( c ) The independent laboratory must perform an initial factory inspection to select the test specimens and establish the materials of construction, chemical make-up, dimensions, tolerances, and other related factors needed to confirm product consistency during follow-up production inspections.
( d ) Production inspections must be performed by the independent laboratory in accordance with subpart 159.007 of this chapter at least annually to confirm that no changes have been made to the product that may adversely affect its fire performance as an interior finish.
( e ) The independent laboratory must prepare production inspection procedures and a report of the results of the fire testing program, and must furnish the manufacturer with three copies of each upon completion of the required testing.
( f ) Materials approved under this subpart must be shipped in packaging that is clearly marked with the name of the manufacturer, product designation, date of manufacture, batch or lot number, and Coast Guard type approval number.
# C_2019025EN.01003701.xml

| 21.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 November 2018 — Prosegur Compañía de Seguridad v Commission

(Case T-406/11) (1)

((State aid - Provisions concerning corporate tax allowing undertakings which are tax resident in Spain to amortise the goodwill resulting from the acquisition of shareholdings in undertakings which are tax resident abroad - Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Concept of State aid - Selectivity - Reference system - Derogation - Difference in treatment - Justification of the difference in treatment - Undertakings benefiting from the measure - Legitimate expectations))

(2019/C 25/46)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Prosegur Compañía de Seguridad, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: initially, J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro and M. Muñoz de Juan, and, subsequently, J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, R. Calvo Salinero and A. Lamadrid de Pablo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, C. Urraca Caviedes and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Article 1(1) and Article 4 of Commission Decision 2011/282/EU of 12 January 2011 on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions No C 45/07 (ex NN 51/07, ex CP 9/07) implemented by Spain (OJ 2011 L 135, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Prosegur Compañía de Seguridad, SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Prosegur Compañía de Seguridad, SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.

---
# C_2011179EN.01002103.xml

| 18.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/21

---

Action brought on 23 March 2011 — ZZ v Council

(Case F-30/11)

2011/C 179/36

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the applicant’s staff report for the period 1.1.2008 to 31.12.2008, and compensation for harm allegedly suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the CDR for 2008 and order the defendant to pay compensation for the harm suffered, provisionally estimated at EUR 5 000 and to be determined more precisely in the course of proceedings, and compensatory and late payment interest calculated at the rate of 6,75 % on the damages for material and non-material harm; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the CDR for 2008 and order the defendant to pay compensation for the harm suffered, provisionally estimated at EUR 5 000 and to be determined more precisely in the course of proceedings, and compensatory and late payment interest calculated at the rate of 6,75 % on the damages for material and non-material harm;

| — | order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

---
§ 140.805 Towing safety. Prior to getting underway, and giving due consideration to the prevailing and expected conditions of the trip or voyage, the officer in charge of the navigational watch for a towing vessel must ensure that: ( a ) The barges, vessels, or objects making up the tow are properly configured and secured;
( b ) Equipment, cargo, and industrial components on board the tow are properly secured and made ready for transit;
( c ) The towing vessel is safely and securely made up to the tow; and
( d ) The towing vessel has appropriate horsepower or bollard pull and is capable of safely maneuvering the tow.
1

Sutton, Tia

From: Sutton, Tia

Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 6:01 PM

To: 'Whiteman, Chad'

Cc: Hengst, Benjamin; Owens, Nicole

Subject: Aircraft GHG to OMB 6-9-15_clean.docx

Attachments: Aircraft GHG to OMB 6-9-15_clean.docx

Hi Chad, 

Clean version of the Aircraft package is attached. 

Thanks, 

 Tia
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MARC CARTER,

Plaintiff, Case Number 14-13502

v. Honorable David M. Lawson

ANDREW CARTER, JOSEPH

MONTGOMERY, NICHOLAS KRINGS,

and DEPUTY GALIMBERT,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING THE CASE

On March 29, 2017, the Court issued an opinion adopting the report and recommendation

of the magistrate judge and denying the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. On April 6,

2017, the magistrate judge filed a certification stating that all pretrial proceedings had been

completed and the matter was ready for trial. However, on April 18, 2017 the defendants filed a

notice of appeal of the Court’s decision denying their motion for summary judgment, and that appeal

remains pending before the Sixth Circuit.

The Court notes that there are no matters presently pending in this litigation that require the

Court’s attention, and, in any event, the Court is precluded from addressing any issues of substance

in the case until the defendants’ appeal is resolved. “The filing of a notice of appeal is an event of

jurisdictional significance — it confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district

court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal.” Griggs v. Provident

Consumer Disc. Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 (1982). “It is generally understood that a federal district court

and a federal court of appeals should not attempt to assert jurisdiction over a case simultaneously.” 

Ibid. In certain circumstances the district court may retain limited power to address aspects of the
case not involved in the appeal, but only when the court’s action “do[es] not threaten the orderly

disposition of the interlocutory appeal.” 16A Fed. Prac. & Proc. Juris. § 3949.1 (4th ed. 2016). 

Because there is no call for further action by the Court in this matter within the immediately

foreseeable future, the Court finds that it is prudent to administratively close the case for now. 

However, this closure shall not be construed as an adjudication on the merits of any claims or

defenses by any party.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case is CLOSED for administrative purposes without

prejudice pending the outcome of the defendants’ appeal. This closing does not constitute a decision

on the merits.

It is further ORDERED that upon the conclusion of the proceedings on appeal, any party

may file a motion to reopen the case and restore it to the active docket.

s/David M. Lawson

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

Dated: August 31, 2017

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on August 31, 2017.

s/Susan Pinkowski 

SUSAN PINKOWSKI

-2-
EXHIBIT 32.1      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Long Island Financial Corp., (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas
C. Manditch, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                         /s/ Douglas C. Manditch
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Douglas C. Manditch
                                             President & Chief Executive Officer
                                             November 14, 2005
<Page>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements on Form S-3 (File No.'s 333-89347, 333-85219, 333-85061, 333-42532
and 333-72282) and Form S-8 (File No.'s 333-45253, 333-64525, 333-46589,
333-52799, 333-72425, 333-79007, 333-52805, 333-56133, 333-08775, 333-37041,
333-33943, 333-18975, 333-18977, 333-08783, 333-81751, 333-87685, 333-88201,
333-87151, 333-84981, 333-80267, 333-08789, 333-08793, 333-08801, 333-23043,
333-42475, 333-31400, 333-31738, 333-40992, 333-43184 and 333-64188) of Lucent
Technologies Inc. of our report dated October 23, 2001, except for the fifth
paragraph of Note 10 and Note 19, as to which the date is November 20, 2001,
relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
NEW YORK, NEW YORK
DECEMBER 26, 2001

                                      119
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.1145 Dry chemical supply. ( a ) A vessel with a cargo carrying capacity less that 1000 m3 (35,300 ft.3) must have at least one self-contained dry chemical storage unit for the cargo area with an independent inert gas pressurizing source adjacent to each unit.
( b ) A vessel with a cargo carrying capacity of 1000 m3 (35,300 ft.3) or more must have at least two self-contained dry chemical storage units for the cargo area with an independent inert gas pressurizing source adjacent to each unit.
( c ) A vessel with bow and stern loading and discharge areas must have at least one self-contained dry chemical storage unit with an independent inert gas pressurizing source adjacent to the unit for each area.
( d ) Each dry chemical storage unit and associated piping must be designed for: ( 1 ) Sequential discharge of each hose line and each monitor for 45 seconds; and
( 2 ) Simultaneous discharge of all hose lines and monitors for 45 seconds.
( e ) Each fully charged dry chemical storage unit must have the greater of the following: ( 1 ) Enough dry chemical to provide for sequential discharge of each attached hose and monitor for 45 seconds.
( 2 ) Enough dry chemical to provide for simultaneous discharge of all attached hoses and monitors for 45 seconds.
#### John B. Grow, *Respondent, v.*Horace Gerlock and Adam J. Snell *et al., Appellants*.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Haight, J.
G-10(D) Applications and Solicitations Model Form (Charge Cards)

Payment Information 

[A statement that charges incurred through use of the charge card are due when the periodic statement is received] 

Fees 

[Annual Fee]/[Set-up and 

Maintenance Fees] 

[Notice of available credit, if applicable] 

[Description of fees for availability or issuance of credit, such as an annual fee, if 

applicable] 

Transaction Fees 

• Balance Transfer [Description of balance transfer fee] 

• Cash Advance [Description of cash advance fee] 

Penalty Fees 

• Late Payment [Description of late payment fee] 

• Over-the-Credit Limit [Description of over-the-credit limit fee] 

• Returned Payment [Description of returned payment fee]
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-4178 

_____________________________

DEMETRIS ANTUAN WALLACE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

William E. Davis, Judge.

April 12, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, M.K. THOMAS, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.170-19 Operating instructions and information for the ship's training manual. ( a ) In order to comply with SOLAS, each release mechanism must have instructions and information for the ship's training manual that use the symbols from IMO Res. A.760(18) (incorporated by reference, see § 160.170-5 of this subpart) to describe the location and operation of the winch.
( b ) The instructions and information required by paragraph (a) of this section may be combined with similar material for survival craft and rescue boats, and their launching systems.
( c ) The release mechanism manufacturer must make the instructions and information required by paragraph (a) of this section available— ( 1 ) In English to purchasers of release mechanisms approved by the Coast Guard; and
( 2 ) In the form of an instruction placard providing simple procedures and illustrations for operation of the release mechanism. The placard must be not greater than 36 cm (14 in) by 51 cm (20 in), and must be made of durable material and suitable for display inside a lifeboat and rescue boat, and near launching apparatuses on vessels.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

FREDERICK MICHAEL HARRIS, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:14-cv-14459 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

 

COMPUWARE CORPORATION, 

 Defendant. 

____________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF 

COUNT II AND FOR DISMISSAL OF COUNT III [ECF #3]

 The Court, having reviewed Defendant’s Motion for Partial Dismissal, the 

briefs of the parties, and heard oral argument from counsel for the parties on March 

24, 2015. For all of the reasons stated on the record at the conclusion of the hearing: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 12(d) of the Federal Rules 

of Civil Procedure, Defendant’s Motion for Partial Dismissal of Count II and for 

Dismissal of Count III [ECF #3] will be treated as one for summary judgment under 

Rule 56. Defendant will not be required to obtain leave of court under LR 7.1(b)(2) to 

file a motion for summary judgment at the conclusion of discovery in this matter. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Partial Dismissal 

[ECF #3] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: 

2:14-cv-14459-MFL-DRG Doc # 12 Filed 03/25/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 136
2

 As to Count II, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion, and the claims for 

failure to accommodate and retaliation under the Americans with Disabilities 

Act are dismissed with prejudice. Only the claim for disability discrimination in 

Count II will proceed to the discovery stage of the litigation. 

 As to Count III, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion, and the claim for a 

violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act will proceed to the 

discovery stage of the litigation. 

 No costs or attorney fees are awarded to either party. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 /s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: March 25, 2015 

Approved as to form: 

s/Rick J. Patterson with consent s/Susan D. Koval 

Rick J. Patterson (P55706) Susan D. Koval (P59297) 

Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant 

2:14-cv-14459-MFL-DRG Doc # 12 Filed 03/25/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 137
- 2158
- 2159
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 151.56-1 Prohibited materials. When one of the following paragraphs of this section is referenced in table 151.05, the materials listed in that paragraph may not be used in components that contact the cargo or its vapor: ( a ) Aluminum or aluminum alloys.
( b ) Copper or copper alloys.
( c ) Zinc, galvanized steel, or alloys having more than 10 percent zinc by weight.
( d ) Magnesium.
( e ) Lead.
( f ) Silver or silver alloys.
( g ) Mercury.
[CGD 88-100, 54 FR 40041, Sept. 29, 1989]
#### § 144.600 Ventilation for accommodations.

Each accommodation space on a vessel must be ventilated in a manner suitable for the purpose of the space.
#### § 169.622 Rudder angle indicators.

Each vessel must have a rudder angle indicator at the main steering location that meets the requirements of § 113.40-10 of this chapter, except where a tiller or direct mechanical linkage is the primary means of controlling the rudder.
§ 111.10-9 Ship's service supply transformers; two required. If transformers are used to supply the ship's service distribution system required by this subpart for ships and mobile offshore drilling units, there must be at least two installed, independent power transformers. With the largest transformer out of service, the capacity of the remaining units must be sufficient to supply the ship service loads. Note to § 111.10-9 :
A ship's service supply system would consist of transformers, overcurrent protection devices, and cables, and would normally be located in the system between a medium voltage bus and a low voltage ship's service switchboard. It is not the intent, nor is it required, that transformers fed by the ship's service switchboard, such as 480/120 transformers, be duplicated.
[CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28277, June 4, 1996; 61 FR 33045, June 26, 1996; USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16360, Mar. 16, 2023]
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.077-3 Required to be worn. ( a ) A Type V hybrid PFD may be used to meet the Coast Guard PFD carriage requirements of subpart 25.25 of this chapter, and 33 CFR part 175, only if the PFD is used in accordance with any requirements on the approval label. PFDs marked “REQUIRED TO BE WORN” must be worn whenever the vessel is underway and the intended wearer is not within an enclosed space.
( b ) If hybrid PFD's with the marking “REQUIRED TO BE WORN” are not worn under the conditions stated in paragraph (a) of this section, other approved PFD's will have to be provided to comply with the applicable carriage requirements in 33 CFR part 175 and subpart 25.25 of this chapter.
( c ) The following PFD's must be marked “REQUIRED TO BE WORN” as specified in § 160.077-31: ( 1 ) Each Type V recreational hybrid PFD.
( 2 ) Each Type V commercial hybrid PFD.
[CGD 78-174, 50 FR 33928, Aug. 22, 1985. Redesignated and amended by CGD 78-174, 60 FR 2486, Jan. 9, 1995]
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.057-7 Procedure for approval. ( a ) Signals are approved by the Coast Guard under the procedures in subpart 159.005 of this chapter.
( b ) [Reserved]
[ARTICLE] 5
[CIK] 0001006762
[NAME] ARCA CORP.
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   YEAR
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1998
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1998
[CASH]                                          81,142
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                   10,529
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                         00
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                               271,251
[PP&E]                                       3,604,182
[DEPRECIATION]                                 280,829
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                               3,681,648
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                          268,048
[BONDS]                                      3,390,429
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                           239
[OTHER-SE]                                   (112,247)
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                 3,681,648
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                               765,468
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                  559,971
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                    19
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                             300,315
[INCOME-PRETAX]                               (94,837)
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                           (94,837)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                  (94,837)
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                    (.04)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                    (.04)
</TABLE>