alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
!

 "#$% & '(   &&!

))	*+ ,-!. /0""1   ( 

! -  222%3456%789:7;<8%=:> ( '!'

?@#A"/AB# &

& C@#A"/A ?







 7=78<,"B"#



D;=5<!:;E:;D<4:F

#BBB49:GG5<-DGG

-4FF5DE:G48,-4FF58:<D/B



F5@HIJKLMNOLPKLQRSIJTLUVWJXWJIUPWM

  !D85:%#/A9>A#/Y##



5D;D;=5<!:;E:;D<4:F,



ZD>5[55F9:F<D9<56[\]76=5;D4F2Z:E;584656:>5;<Z5D[:>5;5^5;5F9569D85%



]76=5;D4F4F^:;35635<ZD<4<ZD8[55F[;:7=Z<<:Z48D<<5F<4:F<ZD<2Z4G5Z5E;584656

:>5;<Z59D85,Z5:2F568<:9_4FD;=5<!:;E%48:2F5;8Z4E:^8<:9_F54<Z5;D^^59<56F:;

43ED9<56Z48659484:F8:F<Z59D85%:25>5;,ZD6Z5_F:2F:^Z48:2F5;8Z4E:^8<:9_4F<Z5

9:;E:;D<4:FD<<Z5<435,4<2:7G6ZD>5;5`74;56;5978DG7F65;<Z5!:65:^!:F679<^:;<Z5F4<56

<D<58]76=58,DF6<Z78,]76=5;D4F64;59<56<ZD<F:<4^\<Z5ED;<458:^<Z548875%



 6>48:;\E4F4:FY#,^;:3<Z5]76494DG!:F^5;5F95!:658:^!:F679<!:334<<55,

E;:>4658<Z5^:GG:24F==746DF95^:;D66;5884F=648`7DG4^49D<4:F<ZD<48F:<6489:>5;567F<4GD^<5;

Da76=5ZD8ED;<494ED<564FD9D85@



b ca76=58Z:7G66489G:85<:<Z5ED;<458<Z5^D9<8[5D;4F=:F648`7DG4^49D<4:FD8

8::FD8<Z:85^D9<8D;5G5D;F565>5F<Z:7=Z<ZD<3D\:997;D^<5;5F<;\:^D

659484:F%Z5ED;<4583D\<Z5F65<5;34F52ZD<;5G45^<Z5\3D\855_DF6D9:7;<

d24<Z:7<<Z5648`7DG4^456a76=5e24GG659465<Z5G5=DG9:F85`75F95,4^DF\,D;484F=

^;:3<Z5ED;<494ED<4:F:^<Z5648`7DG4^456a76=54F<Z55F<5;56659484:F%



 G<Z:7=Z 6>48:;\E4F4:FY#9:F<53EGD<58648`7DG4^49D<4:FD^<5;D!:7;<:^ EE5DG8

:;DGD;=735F<,<Z5!:334<<555fEGD4F56gb8c434GD;9:F8465;D<4:F2:7G6DEEG\2Z5FDa76=35F<

2D85F<5;564FD648<;49<9:7;<[\Da76=5DF64<48GD<5;G5D;F56<ZD<<Z5a76=52D8648`7DG4^456%h

Case 2:14-cv-14711-GAD-RSW ECF No. 28, PageID.133 Filed 08/05/21 Page 1 of 2
	






	
 

	 !""
"#""	!"$%"&		'	

("('"	)'*		!"!'		"	!"	"*"#

		'	+"+(	,
"	!"	*''+"	+

"-(	*!!"($%"

)"'

."/%0		1

#"	

Case 2:14-cv-14711-GAD-RSW ECF No. 28, PageID.134 Filed 08/05/21 Page 2 of 2
§ 90.42 What responsibilities do recipients and agencies have generally to ensure compliance with the Act? ( a ) A recipient has primary responsibility to ensure that its programs or activities are in compliance with the Age Discrimination Act and shall take steps to eliminate violations of the Act. A recipient also has responsibility to maintain records, provide information, and to afford access to its records to an agency to the extent required to determine whether it is in compliance with the Act.
( b ) An agency has responsibility to attempt to secure recipient compliance with the Act by voluntary means. This may include the use of the services of appropriate Federal, State, local, or private organizations. An agency also has the responsibility to enforce the Age Discrimination Act when a recipient fails to eliminate violations of the Act.
[44 FR 33776, June 12, 1979, as amended at 70 FR 24322, May 9, 2005]
EXHIBIT 12.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Joseph Albagli, Chief Executive Officer of VocalTec Communications Ltd.,
certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of VocalTec Communications
     Ltd.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
          by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
          procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control
          over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by
          the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
          likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over
          financial reporting; and


<PAGE>


5.   The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the company's internal
          control over financial reporting.

          Date: July 15, 2008

          /s/ Joseph Albagli
          ------------------
          Joseph Albagli
          Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial
Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned officer of Party City Corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
    the Company for the annual period ended June 28, 2003 (the
    Report) fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|
| | (ii) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                        



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ LINDA M. SILUK     
| |                        
| | Linda M. Siluk         
| | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.

Dated: September 26, 2003

36
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.280 Piping system design. ( a ) Each cargo piping system must meet the standards of Part 56 and §§ 38.10-1(b), 38.10-1(e), and 38.10-10(a) of this chapter.
( b ) Piping carrying cargo or cargo residue may not enter any machinery space except a cargo pumproom.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v

HERBERT T. FELTON, JR.,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 14-30265

ORDER SCHEDULING A DETENTION HEARING

A detention hearing in this case is scheduled as follows:

Place: United States District Court

 600 Church Street, Room 112

 Flint, Michigan

Date and Time:

June 10, 2014 at 3:00 P.M.

IT IS ORDERED: Pending the hearing, the defendant is to be detained in

the custody of the United States Marshal or any other authorized officer. The

custodian must bring the defendant to the hearing at the time, date, and place set

forth above.

Date: June 6, 2014 s/Michael Hluchaniuk

Michael Hluchaniuk

United States Magistrate Judge

1

Case 4:14-cr-20529-TGB-MJH ECF No. 6, PageID.8 Filed 06/06/14 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

The certification setforth below is being submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solelyfor the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18of the United States Code.

 

March 17, 2005

 

Bruce N. Warner, the Chief Financial Officer ofNorthern California Bancorp, Inc. certifies:

 

c.               that thisperiodic report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

d.              thatinformation contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of NorthernCalifornia Bancorp, Inc..

 

 
|   | /s/ Bruce N. Warner                                       |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Bruce  N. Warner                                          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer and  Principal Accounting Officer |

 

1

----
# C_2011282EN.01000302.xml

| 24.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/3

---

Action brought on 22 June 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Denmark

(Case C-323/11)

2011/C 282/05

Language of the case: Danish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: I. Hadjiyiannis and U. Nielsen, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Denmark

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to publish the final river basin management plans by 22 December 2009 and by failing to send the Commission copies thereof by 22 March 2010 and, in any event, by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of Denmark has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2000/60/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to publish the final river basin management plans by 22 December 2009 and by failing to send the Commission copies thereof by 22 March 2010 and, in any event, by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of Denmark has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2000/60/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy;

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Denmark to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Denmark to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Article 13(1), (2) and (6) of the Directive provides that the Member States were to adopt the laws and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the Directive by 22 December 2009 and to send the Commission copies thereof by 22 March 2010.

Since the Commission is not in possession of any information which enables it to establish that the necessary provisions have been adopted, the Commission must proceed on the assumption that Denmark has not yet adopted those provisions and has therefore failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive.

---

(1)  OJ 2000 L 327, p. 1, 22.12.2000.

1

---
STATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
OFFICE OF THE 89 KINGS HIGHWAY PHONE: (302) 739-9000

SECRETARY DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 FAX: (302) 739-6242

April 1, 2010

Mr. ShawnM. Garvin (3RAOO) Regional Administrator U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029

# Dear~~.-: I am pleased to submit the enclosed revision to the State ofDelaware State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Attainment and Maintenance ofthe 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard. The revision is to 7 DE Admin. Code 1125

- REQUIREMENTS FORPRECONSTRUCTIONREVIEW, Section 3.0

- Prevention ofSignificantDeterioration of Air Quality. 7 DE Admin. Code 1125 regulates emissions ofpollutants from new and modified facilities, and is organized by attainment status ofpollutants emitted relative to federal national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). This action is to amend 3.0 of7 DE Admin. Code 1125 to cite explicitlythat nitrogen oxides (NOx) is a precursor to the fonnation ofground-level ozone. EPA requires this revision (see 73 FR 16205, March 27,2008)because they have determined the current regulatory language is not clear that NOx, in addition to volatile organic compounds, is a ground-level ozone precursor. This action has no immediate impact because all ofDelaware is classified as non-attainment ofthe ground-level ozone NAAQS. This revision is effectiveAprilll,2010. Therequirements ofthe CAA Section 110(a)(2)(A) have been met through the normal public hearingprocess established by the State ofDelaware with proper notification (30 days) prior to the convening ofthe public hearing. Attachments A and B are copies ofaffidavits as proofofproper notification. It is the position ofthe State ofDelaware that all minimum requirements set forth inthe 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments have beenmet. We look forward to continuing the cooperative effort between Delaware and EPA in this importantwork. As always, feel free to contact me or Ali Mirzakhalili, Administrator, (302) 739-9402, ifyou have any questions concerning the enclosed documents.

### Mr. Shawn Garvin April 1, 2010 Page 2

in P. O'Mara Secretary

cc: David Arnold, EPA w/encl. Ali Mirzakhalili
From: skolo@ncemch.org [mailto:skolo@ncemch.org] On Behalf Of Sarah Kolo

Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 12:38 PM

To: Robert Chew Subject: Re: Safety Net Dental Clinic Manual Question

Hello, again, Rob,

Thanks for your patience! I reached the original author and he sent information about your questions.

(1) I was wondering where the start

- up cost information comes from,

particularly for the “Construction”, “Large Equipment” and “Supplies,

Instrument s and Small Equipment” categories. I see in the footnote that the data was collected in 2004 but I was wondering if you had any information about the source of the information (is it survey data or were the cost figures determined through equipment costs provided by vendors?).

The cost of the equipment was obtained from equipment suppliers Henry Schein

and ADEC. The equipment list was the one used by the Indian Health Service when they construct a new facility. This was for large and small equipment as well as supplies. The prices had been adjusted for inflation up until 2010.

(2) Is there information for the “Construction”, “Large Equipment” and “Supplies, Instruments and Small Equipment” categories that are broken out into more specific line it ems? For example, do you have information on what equipment is included in the “Large Equipment” category and how much each piece of equipment cost when the table was put together?

When we were originally designing the site we were going to have all of th e materials on the attached lists included on the site. But it was decided that this

was too much information. Attached are various tables that I worked up and they include all equipment including dental vacuum system and air compressor.

Hope this hel ps, Rob. Let me know if you would like further information.

Sarah Kolo

National Maternal and Child Oral Health Resource Center Georgetown University

Box 571272 Washington, DC 20057

- 1272 (202) 784

- 9553sk22@george town.edu

www.mchoralhealth.org
#### § 159.003-7 Multiple approval numbers.

A product will not be issued a Coast Guard approval number by the Coast Guard if it already holds a Coast Guard approval number issued by a foreign authority under a Mutual Recognition Agreement.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.132-17 Marking and labeling. ( a ) Each davit must be marked with a plate or label permanently affixed in a conspicuous place readily for inspection and sufficiently durable to withstand continuous exposure to environmental conditions at sea for the life of the davit.
( b ) The plate or label must be in English, but may also be in other languages.
( c ) The plate or label must contain the— ( 1 ) Name and address of the manufacturer;
( 2 ) Manufacturer's model identification;
( 3 ) Name of the independent laboratory that witnessed the prototype or production tests;
( 4 ) Serial number of the davit;
( 5 ) U.S. Coast Guard approval number;
( 6 ) Month and year of manufacture;
( 7 ) Safe working load of the davit; and
( 8 ) Word “SOLAS”.
# C_2014031EN.01001902.xml

| 1.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/19

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 11 December 2013 — Verile and Gjergji v Commission

(Case F-130/11) (1)

1

(Civil service - Officials - Pensions - Transfer of pension rights acquired in a national pension scheme - Regulation adjusting the rate of contribution to the European Union pension scheme - Adjustment of actuarial values - Need to adopt general implementing provisions - Temporal application of the new general implementing provisions - Withdrawal of a proposal for crediting of pensionable years - Lawfulness - Conditions)

2014/C 31/32

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Marco Verile (Cadrezzate, Italy) and Anduela Gjergji (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and S. Orlandi, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decisions transferring pension rights acquired before entry into the Commission’s service based on the recalculated proposal of the PMO.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decisions of the European Commission of 20 May 2011 and of 19 May 2011 addressed respectively to Mr Verile and Ms Gjergji; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decisions of the European Commission of 20 May 2011 and of 19 May 2011 addressed respectively to Mr Verile and Ms Gjergji;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Mr Verile and Ms Gjergji. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Mr Verile and Ms Gjergji.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 3.3.2012, p. 22.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.138-2 Incorporation by reference. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76705 , Sept. 18, 2024.
( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this subpart with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material is available for inspection at the U.S. Coast Guard, Office of Design and Engineering Standards (CG-ENG), 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, and is available from the sources listed below. It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( b ) International Maritime Organization (IMO) Publishing, 4 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR, United Kingdom, +44 (0)20 7735 7611, *http://www.imo.org .* ( 1 ) 2010 FTP Code, International Code for Application of Fire Test Procedures, 2010 (Resolution MSC.307(88)), 2012 Edition (“FTP Code”), IBR approved for § 164.138-3(a).
( 2 ) Resolution A.754(18), Recommendation on Fire Resistance Tests for “A”, “B” and “F” Class Divisions, adopted 4 November 1993 (“IMO Resolution A. 754(18)”), IBR approved for § 164.138-3(a).
# C_2009318EN.01012101.xml

| 23.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 318/121 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 318/121

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 on the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of pet animals’

COM(2009) 268 final — 2009/0077 (COD)

2009/C 318/23

On 30 June 2009 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 152, 4b) of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the

‘Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 on the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of pet animals’

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinions CES 1411/2000 and CESE 1705/2007 adopted on 29 November 2000 (1) and 12 December 2007 (2), it decided, at its 456th plenary session, held on 30 September-1 October 2009 (meeting of 30 September 2009), by 180 votes in favour and 9 abstentions to issue an opinion endorsing the proposal and to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.

1

2

Brussels, 30 September 2009.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Mario SEPI

---

(1)  EESC Opinion on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the animal-health requirements applicable to non-commercial movement of pet animals - OJ C 116 of 20.4.2001, p. 54.

1

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the animal-health requirements applicable to non-commercial movement of pet animals

(2)  EESC Opinion on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 on the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movements of pet animals as regards the extension of the transitional period – OJ C 120 of 16.5.2008, p. 49.

2

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 on the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movements of pet animals as regards the extension of the transitional period

---