alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHAUN SINER

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 14-CV-12578

v. HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH

SCOTT GOINGS, STEVEN SCARPINO,

and JACKSON CITY POLICE 

DEPARTMENT,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 37), AND GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 20)

Pro se plaintiff, currently serving a prison sentence after pleading guilty to narcotics

distribution charges, brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force and

other constitutional violations of his rights under the Fourth, Sixth, and Fourteenth

Amendments, arising out of his arrest and prosecution for the drug charges. An order of

reference was entered referring all pretrial matters to the magistrate judge. All defendants,

Jackson police officers Scott Goings and Steven Scarpino, and the Jackson City Police

Department, filed a motion for summary judgment. On March 27, 2015, Magistrate Judge

David Grand issued his report and recommendation, recommending that defendants’

motion be granted. The magistrate judge specifically stated that any objections to his

report were to be filed within 14 days of service, and that failure to file such objections

constituted a waiver of any further right to appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155

(1985). No such objections have been filed and the time period for doing so has expired.

-1-

2:14-cv-12578-GCS-DRG Doc # 39 Filed 04/23/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 513
The court has reviewed the record and briefing in this matter, as well as the

magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, and adopts the result recommended

therein. Accordingly, defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 20) is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 23, 2015

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

April 23, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also on

Chaun Siner #861914, Carson City Correctional Facility,

10274 Boyer Road, Carson City, MI 48811.

s/Barbara Radke

Deputy Clerk

-2-

2:14-cv-12578-GCS-DRG Doc # 39 Filed 04/23/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 514
§ 79.29 Sanctions. ( a ) The ALJ may sanction a person, including any party or representative, for— ( 1 ) Failing to comply with an order, rule, or procedure governing the proceeding;
( 2 ) Failing to prosecute or defend an action; or
( 3 ) Engaging in other misconduct that interferes with the speedy, orderly, or fair conduct of the hearing.
( b ) Any such sanction, including but not limited to those listed in paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section, shall reasonably relate to the severity and nature of the failure or misconduct.
( c ) When a party fails to comply with an order, including an order for taking a deposition, the production of evidence within the party's control, or a request for admission, the ALJ may— ( 1 ) Draw an inference in favor of the requesting party with regard to the information sought;
( 2 ) In the case of requests for admission, deem each matter of which an admission is requested to be admitted;
( 3 ) Prohibit the party failing to comply with such order from introducing evidence concerning, or otherwise relying upon, testimony relating to the information sought; and
( 4 ) Strike any part of the pleadings or other submissions of the party failing to comply with such request.
( d ) If a party fails to prosecute or defend an action under this part commenced by service of a notice of hearing, the ALJ may dismiss the action or may issue an initial decision imposing penalties and assessments.
( e ) The ALJ may refuse to consider any motion, request, response, brief or other document which is not filed in a timely fashion.
1-787 ( Rev . 05-25 -2012) . ... . .. . ~ . " 

# - . . .- . - .. " . . 

# " , . ~--

' -- -- - ~ -- ~-
Exhibit 10.2

    

     

    

     RESOLUTION OF THE SHAREHOLDERS

     

      

    OF

     

    

    SEEDO CORP.

     

    

    The following is a true copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Majority of the Shareholders of the Corporation at a special meeting, notice to this meeting having been waived, held this 24th day of
      June, 2020;

     

    

    WHEREAS there has been presented to and considered by this meeting a Motion to elect new Directors and Board Members of the Company;

     

    

    NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the majority of shareholders having considered this matter, and having opened the floor to all those who voice a preference in the issue, have overwhelmingly decided
      and RESOLVED that we have elected:

     

    

    DAVID GROSSMAN as Director, and Chief Executive Officer;

    DR. GIL FEILER as Director, and Chairman of the Board;

    DAVID FREIDENBERG, as Board Member

     

    

    The Above qualified people, having been nominated, have Accepted their positions.

     

    

    Said Motion is hereby passed and the corporate books, records and the Company shall file this Resolution in the corporate records.

     

    

    Dated: 24th June, 2020

    

    

    
                  

      ____________________
      
        Zohar Levy, on behalf of the majority Shareholders
EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned  hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial  Officer of
Belcrest Capital Fund LLC (the "Fund"), that:

(a)  the  quarterly  Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June
     30, 2003 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
     13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund
     for such period.

Date:  August 14 , 2003



                                                /s/ Michelle A. Alexander
                                                -------------------------
                                                Michelle A. Alexander
                                                Chief Financial Officer
2:14-cv-13657-AC-PTM Doc # 3 Filed 10/07/14 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 66
2:14-cv-13657-AC-PTM Doc # 3 Filed 10/07/14 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 67
2:14-cv-13657-AC-PTM Doc # 3 Filed 10/07/14 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 68
|EXHIBIT 32.2
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer ofBelcrestCapital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | theQuarterlyReport of the Fund on Form10-Qfor thequarterendedMarch 31, 2009(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                



|Date:May 11, 2009
|-----------------



| | /s/Andrew C. FrenetteAndrew C. FrenetteChief Executive Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 148

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59783, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 148.61 Emergency response information.

The shipper of a material listed in Table 148.10 of this part must provide the master or his representative with appropriate emergency response information. This information may be included on the shipping papers or in a separate document such as a material safety data sheet (MSDS). The information must include preliminary first aid measures and emergency procedures to be carried out in the event of an incident or fire involving the cargo.
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 151.03-5 Approved.

This term means approved by the Commandant unless otherwise stated.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

HORACE CRUMP, JR., #236528,

 Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:14-CV-12761

HONORABLE JOHN CORBETT O’MEARA

RICHARD CADY, et al.,

 Defendants.

 /

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Michigan prisoner Horace Crump, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) filed a pro se civil rights complaint, as well

as an application to proceed without prepayment of the $350.00 filing fee (and without payment of the

$50.00 administrative fee) for this action. The Court denied Plaintiff’s application to proceed without

prepayment of the filing fee pursuant to the three strikes rule, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and dismissed the

complaint without prejudice.

The matter is now before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of that decision. 

Plaintiff’s motion must be denied. A motion for reconsideration which presents issues already ruled

upon by the district court, either expressly or by reasonable implication, will not be granted. Hence v.

Smith, 49 F. Supp. 2d 547, 550 (E.D. Mich. 1999); Czajkowski v. Tindall & Assoc., P.C., 967 F. Supp.

951, 952 (E.D. Mich. 1997). Such is the case here. The Court properly denied Plaintiff’s application

to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee under the three strikes rule based upon his prior filings

and his failure to sufficiently allege or establish that he is under imminent danger of serious physical

injury, as explained in the Court’s opinion. Plaintiff has not met his burden of showing a palpable

defect by which the Court has been misled or his burden of showing that a different disposition must

5:14-cv-12761-JCO-MKM Doc # 7 Filed 08/18/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 69
result from a correction thereof, as required by Local Rule 7.1(h)(3). Accordingly, the Court DENIES

Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration. This case is closed. No further pleadings should be filed in this

matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/John Corbett O’Meara 

United States District Judge

Date: August 18, 2014

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of record on

this date, August 18, 2014, using the ECF system and/or ordinary mail.

s/William Barkholz 

Case Manager

2

5:14-cv-12761-JCO-MKM Doc # 7 Filed 08/18/14 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 70
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.325 Accommodation, service, and control spaces. ( a ) Accommodation, service, and control spaces must be outside the cargo area.
( b ) If a hold space having a cargo containment system, required by this part to have a secondary barrier, is separated from any accommodation, service, or control space by a cruciform joint, there must be a cofferdam providing at least 760 mm (30 inches) by 760 mm (30 inches) clearance on one side of the cruciform joint.
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.215 Safety equipment lockers. Each self-propelled ship must have the following: ( a ) Each tankship must have at least two safety equipment lockers.
( b ) One safety equipment locker must be adjacent to the emergency shutdown station required by § 153.296(b). This locker must contain one set of the equipment required by § 153.214(a) and two sets of that required by § 153.214(b).
( c ) The second safety equipment locker must be adjacent to the second emergency shutdown station required by § 153.296. This locker must contain the remaining equipment required by § 153.214 (a) and (b).
( d ) Each safety equipment locker must be marked as described in § 153.955 (c), (d), and
( e ) with the legend “SAFETY EQUIPMENT.”
[CGD 73-96, 42 FR 49027, Sept. 26, 1977, as amended by CGD 78-128, 47 FR 21207, May 17, 1982; CGD 81-101, 52 FR 7781, Mar. 12, 1987]
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2011 - 0918 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2011 -NM - 090 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.482 Stripping quantities and interim standards for Category C NLS tanks on ships built before July 1, 1986: Category C. Unless waived under § 153.483 or § 153.491, each Category C NLS cargo tank on ships built before July 1, 1986 must meet the following: ( a ) Unless the tank meets the interim standard provided by paragraph (b) of this section, the tank must have a stripping quantity determined under 153.1604 that is less than 0.95 m3.
( b ) Before October 3, 1994, the tank may have a total NLS residue determined under § 153.1608 that is less than 3.0 m3 or 1/1000th of the tank's capacity.
# C_2011355EN.01001001.xml

| 3.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/10

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Guimarães (Portugal) lodged on 22 September 2011 — Jonathan Rodrigues Esteves v Seguros Allianz Portugal SA

(Case C-486/11)

2011/C 355/16

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal da Relação de Guimarães

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Jonathan Rodrigues Esteves

Applicant:

Defendant: Seguros Allianz Portugal SA

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| (a) | Must Article 1a of the Third Motor Insurance Directive (90/232/EEC) (1) — inserted by Article 4 of the Fifth Motor Insurance Directive (2005/14/EC) (2) — on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles be interpreted as precluding national law (such as that stemming from Articles 505 and 570 of the Portuguese Civil Code) which provides that that compulsory insurance against such liability does not cover liability for the personal and material damage caused to a cyclist in a road-traffic accident between a motor vehicle and a bicycle, even though the accident is due solely to the cyclist’s conduct? |
| --- | --- |

(a)

Must Article 1a of the Third Motor Insurance Directive (90/232/EEC) (1) — inserted by Article 4 of the Fifth Motor Insurance Directive (2005/14/EC) (2) — on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles be interpreted as precluding national law (such as that stemming from Articles 505 and 570 of the Portuguese Civil Code) which provides that that compulsory insurance against such liability does not cover liability for the personal and material damage caused to a cyclist in a road-traffic accident between a motor vehicle and a bicycle, even though the accident is due solely to the cyclist’s conduct?

1

2

| (b) | If the answer is in the affirmative — that is, such an exclusion of compensation is contrary to Community law — is national legislation that limits or reduces such compensation, having regard to the fault of the cyclist, on the one hand, and the risk posed by the motor vehicle, on the other, in causing the accident, compatible with the aforementioned Community directives? |
| --- | --- |

(b)

If the answer is in the affirmative — that is, such an exclusion of compensation is contrary to Community law — is national legislation that limits or reduces such compensation, having regard to the fault of the cyclist, on the one hand, and the risk posed by the motor vehicle, on the other, in causing the accident, compatible with the aforementioned Community directives?

---

(1)  OJ 1990 L 129, p. 33.

1

(2)  OJ 2005 L 149, p. 14.

2

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 73 (Tuesday, April 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19201-19202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1918]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 11:30 a.m., Monday, April 23, 2007.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

[[Page 19202]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave 
Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members at 202-452-
2955.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 13, 
2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 07-1918 Filed 4-13-07; 1:57 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
##### 



Exhibit No. 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of barnesandnoble.com inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin
M. Frain, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                             
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

|    |  |                                             
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Kevin M. Frain                          
|    |  |                                             
|    |  | Kevin M. Frain                              
|   
|   
|   
|   
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer                     
|   
|   
|   
|   
|    |  | (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
|   
|   
|   
|   
|    |  | barnesandnoble.com inc.                     
|   
|   
|   
|   
|    |  | August 14, 2002
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
As independent registered public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by referencein Registration Statements Nos. 333-06199, 333-34019 and 333-99311 on Form S-8 and Nos. 333-91679and 333-30194 on Form S-3, of our report dated February 8, 2005, relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the relatedconsolidated statements of operations, cash flows and changes in stockholders’ equity for each ofthe three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, included in the 2004 Annual Report on Form10-K of Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. It should be noted that we have not audited any financialstatements of the company subsequent to February 8, 2005, or performed any audit proceduressubsequent to the date of our report.
/s/ Mayer Hoffman McCann, P.C.
Phoenix, Arizona
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-1001 

________________________________________________________________________ 

NUCLEAR SAFETY 

 Arrangement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and INDONESIA 

Signed at Vienna October 1, 2008 

with 

Addenda 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
INDONESIA 

Nuclear Safety 

 Arrangement signed at Vienna October 1, 2008; 

 Entered into force October 1, 2008. 

 With addenda.