alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(As Amended Through January 27, 2011)
 1. Establishment, Purpose and Term of Plan.
 Establishment.  Plan   Effective Date 
 Purpose.
 Term of Plan.
 2. Definitions and Construction.
 Definitions.
  Board 
  Change in Control 
   Transaction   Transferee 




---



##### 



 Code 
  Committee 
  Company 
  Compensation 
  Eligible Employee 
  Employee 
 Executive
  Fair Market Value 
  2




---



##### 



The Wall Street Journal
   Incumbent Director 
  Offering 
  Offering Date 
  Offering Period 
  Ownership Change Event 
  Parent Corporation 
  Participant 
  Participating Company 
  Participating Company Group 
  Purchase Date 
 3




---



##### 



 Purchase Period 
  Purchase Price 
  Purchase Right 
  Securities Act 
  Stock 
  Subscription Agreement 
  Subscription Date 
  Subsidiary Corporation 
 Construction.
 3. Administration.
 Administration by the Committee.
 Authority of Officers.
 4




---



##### 



Power to Adopt Sub-plans.
 Policies and Procedures Established by the Company.
 Repricing.  Underwater Purchase Rights 
 Indemnification.
 4. Shares Subject to Plan.
 Maximum Number of Shares Issuable.
 5




---



##### 



Adjustments for Changes in Capital Structure.  New Shares 
 5. Eligibility.
 Employees Eligible to Participate.
   Exclusion of Certain Stockholders.
 Determination by Company.
 6




---



##### 



6. Offerings.
  7. Participation in the Plan.
 Initial Participation.
 Continued Participation.
 8. Right to Purchase Shares.
 Grant of Purchase Right.  Dollar Limit 
 7




---



##### 



 Share Limit 
 Calendar Year Purchase Limitation.
 9. Purchase Price.
  10. Accumulation of Purchase Price through Payroll Deduction.
  Amount of Payroll Deductions.
 Commencement of Payroll Deductions.
 Election to Decrease or Stop Payroll Deductions.  Change Notice Date 
 8




---



##### 



Administrative Suspension of Payroll Deductions.
 Participant Accounts.
 No Interest Paid.
 11. Purchase of Shares.
 Exercise of Purchase Right.
 Generally.
 Purchase by Non-United States Participants for Whom Payroll Deduction Are Prohibited by
Applicable Law.  non-United States Participant 
 Pro Rata Allocation of Shares.
 9




---



##### 



Delivery of Certificates.
 Return of Plan Account Balance.
 Tax Withholding.
 Expiration of Purchase Right.
 Provision of Reports and Stockholder Information to Participants.
 12. Withdrawal from Plan.
 Voluntary Withdrawal from the Plan.
 10




---



##### 



Return of Plan Account Balance.
 13. Termination of Employment or Eligibility.
  14. Effect of Change in Control on Purchase Rights.
  Acquiring Corporation 
 15. Nontransferability of Purchase Rights.
  16. Compliance with Securities Law.
  11




---



##### 



17. Rights as a Stockholder and Employee.
  18. Legends.
   19. Notification of Disposition of Shares.
  12




---



##### 



20. Designation of Beneficiary.
 Designation Procedure.
 Absence of Beneficiary Designation.
 21. Notices.
  22. Amendment or Termination of the Plan.
   Secretary 13
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of EvolutionPetroleum Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30,2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Robert S. Herlin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed thiscertification as of the 24th day of September, 2008.

 
|        | /s/ ROBERT S. HERLIN                  |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Robert S. Herlin                      |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Evolution Petroleum Corporation andwill be retained by Evolution Petroleum Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certificate is being furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to this Form 10-Kand shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-K.

 

----
2:14-cv-14488-PDB-RSW Doc # 41 Filed 12/22/16 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 806
2:14-cv-14488-PDB-RSW Doc # 41 Filed 12/22/16 Pg 2 of 7 Pg ID 807
2:14-cv-14488-PDB-RSW Doc # 41 Filed 12/22/16 Pg 3 of 7 Pg ID 808
2:14-cv-14488-PDB-RSW Doc # 41 Filed 12/22/16 Pg 4 of 7 Pg ID 809
2:14-cv-14488-PDB-RSW Doc # 41 Filed 12/22/16 Pg 5 of 7 Pg ID 810
2:14-cv-14488-PDB-RSW Doc # 41 Filed 12/22/16 Pg 6 of 7 Pg ID 811
2:14-cv-14488-PDB-RSW Doc # 41 Filed 12/22/16 Pg 7 of 7 Pg ID 812
§ 143.220 Machinery space fire prevention. ( a ) All seals and gaskets must be properly maintained to prevent leaks of flammable or combustible liquid, as those terms are defined in 46 CFR subpart 30.10, into the machinery space.
( b ) Piping and machinery components that exceed 220 °C (428 °F), including fittings, flanges, valves, exhaust manifolds, and turbochargers, must be insulated. Measures must be in place to prevent flammable or combustible liquid piping leaks from coming into contact with these components.
( c ) Flammable and combustible products must not be stored in machinery spaces, unless they are stored in a suitable container that meets the requirements of § 142.225 of this subchapter.
## UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

______________________________ BAP No. MB 98-096

______________________________ IN RE: SANDI BONFI GLIO, Debtor.

______________________________ HAROLD B. MURPHY , TRUSTEE, Appellant,
v. SANDI BONFIGLIO, Appellee.

______________________________ Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District o

f Massachusetts (Hon. William C. Hillman, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge)

______________________________

Before Goodman, Haines and Carlo, U.S. Bankruptcy Judges

______________________________ Andrew G. Lizotte, Esq. and Hanify & King, P.C., on brief for the Appellant. Mark H. Vanger, Esq., on brief for the Appellee.

______________________________ January 29, 1999

______________________________2

Per Curiam Chapter 7 trustee, Harold B. Murphy, appeals the bankruptcy court's order overruling his objection to the debtor's homestead exemption claim. We affirm th e lowe r court's ruling on the authority of the First Circuit's decision in Patriot Portfolio, LLC, v. Weinstein , __ F.3d __ (1st Cir. 1999). In re Weinstein held that the Massachusetts homestead exemption's exception for contract debts incurred before the filing of a homestead declaration does not operate in bankruptcy. That case addresses and resolves (against appellant) all issues critical to the appeal. Further explication is unnecessary. The order of the bankruptcy court overruling appellant's objection to the debtor's homestead exemption is AFFIRMED .
----

Note the sparse nature of the high-backscatter dredged material deposit.  Compare to Figures 17 and 19,  and to Plate 6. Scale across the bottom of the image is about 10 km.  Vertical  exaggeration is 3x.

----

----

----

SusanA. Cochran

U.S. Department of the Interior,U.S.Geological Survey,Western RegionCoastal and Marine Geology
---

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 
Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 
as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Brad Jacoby, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Global Innovation Corp. ("GIC"), formerly Integrated Performance Systems, Inc. ("IPS");

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for GIC and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of GIC's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in GIC's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during GIC's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, GIC's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. GIC's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which could adversely affect GIC's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in GIC's internal control over financial reporting,

|Date: June 14, 2007 | /s/    BRAD JACOBY     
|------------------- | -----------------------
|                    | Brad Jacoby            
|                    | Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMOQUEST
CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 27,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                          70,058
<SECURITIES>                                     1,663
<RECEIVABLES>                                  109,763
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,464
<INVENTORY>                                     72,224
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               264,546
<PP&E>                                          87,675
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,795
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 595,976
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          127,408
<BONDS>                                         92,271
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           510
<OTHER-SE>                                     355,799
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   595,976
<SALES>                                        315,198
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               315,198
<CGS>                                          164,616
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  164,616
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,172
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   716
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,405
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 52,099
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,672
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,427
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,427
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57
        




</TABLE>
SEATTLE

TACOMA

123°15’ 123° 122°30’ 122°

47°19’

47°30’

47°50’

10 Miles

10 Km 1:400,000

INSET MAP 10: RESIDUAL AEROMAGNETIC ANOMALIES

IN SEATTLE/TACOMA REGION Paleoseismic trench 

LiDAR-identified fault scarps

EXPLANATION

Magnitude 5.0 4.0 3.0 

Depth 0-35 km

Earthquakes 1970-present, Pacific 

Northwest Seismic Network (PNSN) Residual Magnetic 

Anomaly (nT)

Blakely and others, 1999

7.8

3.6

2.0

1.1

0.5

0.0

-0.3

-0.6

-0.9

-1.2

-1.6

-2.1

-2.8

-4.2

-7.1

SEATTLE

TACOMA

123°15’ 123° 122°30’ 122°

47°30’

47°50’

47°19’

10 Miles

10 Km 1:400,000

INSET MAP 9: AEROMAGNETIC ANOMALIES

IN SEATTLE/TACOMA REGION

271.9

139.8

77.9

33.5

-5.0

-41.7

-79.5

-118.4

-149.1

-175.3

-198.0

-216.9

-235.9

-262.0

-311.9

Magnetic Anomaly (nT)

Blakely and others, 1999

Aeromagnetic lineament along 

South Whidbey Island Fault Zone

(Sherrod and others, 2008)

++++++++++++++

 Paleoseismic trench 

LiDAR-identified fault scarps

EXPLANATION

Locations of sharp magnetic contrasts, 

estimated from magnetic anomalies

Magnitude 5.0 4.0 3.0 

Depth 0-35 km

Earthquakes 1970-present, Pacific 

Northwest Seismic Network (PNSN)
§ 125.115 Oil fuel tank protection. ( a ) An OSV of at least 6,000 GT ITC (500 GRT if GT ITC is not assigned) that is delivered after August 1, 2010, with an aggregate capacity of 600 cubic meters or more of oil fuel, must comply with the requirements of Regulation 12A of Annex I to MARPOL 73/78 (incorporated by reference, see § 125.180) at all times.
( b ) Transfer of excess fuel oil from the fuel supply tanks of an OSV of at least 6,000 GT ITC (500 GRT if GT ITC is not assigned) to an offshore drilling or production facility will not cause Subchapter D of this chapter to apply to the OSV, provided that the vessel is— ( 1 ) Not a tankship as defined in 46 CFR 30.10-67; and
( 2 ) In the service of oil exploitation.
[USCG-2012-0208, 79 FR 48933, Aug. 18, 2014]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with
this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report of Loral Space & Communications Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the
period ending December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Avi Katz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | /s/ Avi Katz                          
| | --------------------------------------
| | Avi Katz                              
| | President, General Counsel & Secretary



April 11, 2013
§ 120.372 Equipment and conductor grounding. ( a ) All metallic enclosures and frames of electrical equipment must be permanently grounded to the hull on a metallic vessel. On a nonmetallic vessel, the enclosures and frames of electrical equipment must be bonded together to a common ground by a normally non-current carrying conductor. Metallic cases of instruments and secondary windings of instrument transformers must be grounded.
( b ) On a nonmetallic vessel, where a ground plate is provided for radio equipment, it must be connected to the common ground.
( c ) Equipment grounding conductors must be sized in accordance with Section 250-95 of the NEC (NFPA 70), or other standard specified by the Commandant.
( d ) Each insulated grounding conductor of a cable must be identified by one of the following means. ( 1 ) A green braid or green insulation;
( 2 ) Stripping the insulation from the entire exposed length of the grounding conductor; or
( 3 ) Marking the exposed insulation of the grounding conductor with green tape or green adhesive labels.
( e ) Cable armor must not be used to ground electrical equipment of systems.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, Daniel Mckinney, the Chief Executive Officer of Asia Properties, Inc. hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the report on Form 10-Q of Asia Properties, Inc., for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Asia Properties, Inc.. Date: August 2011. /s/ Daniel Mckinney_______________________________Daniel MckinneyChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) 2296726.2 1


---
# C_2011290EN.01000401.xml

| 1.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 290/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 290/4

---

Appeal brought on 22 July 2011 by Région Nord-Pas-de-Calais against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 12 May 2011 in Joined Cases T-267/08 and T-279/08 Région Nord-Pas-de-Calais and Communauté d'Agglomération du Douaisis v Commission.

(Case C-389/11 P)

2011/C 290/06

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Région Nord-Pas-de-Calais (represented by: M. Cliquennois and F. Cavedon, avocats)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Communauté d'Agglomération du Douaisis, European Commission

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 12 May 2011 in Joined Cases T-267/08 and T-279/08; |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 12 May 2011 in Joined Cases T-267/08 and T-279/08;

| — | grant the forms of order sought at first instance by the Région Nord-Pas-de-Calais; |
| --- | --- |

—

grant the forms of order sought at first instance by the Région Nord-Pas-de-Calais;

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant relies on two grounds in support of its appeal.

First, the Région Nord-Pas-de-Calais claims that the General Court erred in refusing to examine the grounds of complaint against Commission Decision C(2008) 1089 final of 2 April 2008, withdrawn and replaced by Commission Decision C(2010) 4112 final of 23 June 2010, both decisions relating to the same State aid, C 38/2007 (ex NN 45/2007). According to the appellant, the further decision was in fact a response to the written pleadings which the appellant had submitted in its initial action before the General Court, and the appellant was given no opportunity to be heard within a further prior administrative procedure.

Second, the appellant claims an infringement of the rights of the defence and the principle of the right to be heard within the administrative procedure in that the Commission adopted a further decision while absolving itself of the obligation to comply with the essential procedural requirements of that adoption. The Commission altered its analysis on the nature of the State measure at issue and revised the method for the calculation of the reference rates applicable when the State aid in favour of Arbel Fauvet Rail SA was granted.

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 107

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59780, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 107.283 Certificate of Inspection: Conditions of validity.

To maintain a valid Certificate of Inspection, you must complete your annual and periodic inspections within the periods specified in §§ 107.269 and 107.270 and your Certificate of Inspection must be endorsed.

[USCG-1999-4976, 65 FR 6504, Feb. 9, 2000]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 69 (Wednesday, April 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 18312]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1808]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing 
Commission

AGENCY: Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of meeting location and time.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists the location and time of the first meeting 
of the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing 
Commission.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jack Wells, Chief Economist, U.S. 
Department of Transportation, 202-366-9224, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0a606b6961247d6f6666794a6e657e246d657c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c4aea5a7afeab3a1a8a8b784a0abb0eaa3abb2">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By Federal Register Notice dated March 12, 
2007, the U.S. Department of Transportation the ``Department'') issued 
a notice of intent to form the National Surface Transportation 
Infrastructure Financing Commission (the ``Financing Commission''), in 
accordance with the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(``FACA'') (5 U.S.C. App. 2) and the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, 
Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (``SAFETEA-
LU'') (Pub. L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144). Section 11142(a) of SAFETEA-LU 
established the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure 
Financing Commission and charged it to analyze future highway and 
transit needs and the finances of the Highway Trust Fund and to make 
recommendations regarding alternative approaches to financing 
transportation infrastructure.

Notice of Meeting Location and Time

    The Department has set April 25, 2007, as the date for the 
inaugural Financing Commission meeting. The meeting will take place 
from 9:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at the Oklahoma City Memorial Room (Room 
2230) in the Department's headquarters building, located at 400 7th 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590.

    Issued on April 6, 2007.
Jack Wells,
Chief Economist, U.S. Department of Transportation, Designated Federal 
Official.
[FR Doc. 07-1808 Filed 4-6-07; 3:01 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>