alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive and Acting Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350**

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer of Human BioSystems (the "Company"),  hereby certify, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-QSB of the Company  for  the  quarter ended  March 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934   and  that  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 15, 2006

/s/Harry Masuda 

Harry Masuda 

Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
# C_2008149EN.01002201.xml

| 14.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 149/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 149/22

---

Commission Communication concerning the implementation of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 552/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the European Air Traffic Management network (1)

1

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 149/06)

(Publication of titles and references of Community specifications under the Regulation)

(Publication of titles and references of Community specifications under the Regulation)

| Organisation | Reference | Edition number | Title of the Community specifications | Edition date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Eurocontrol (2) | Spec-0106 | 4.1 | Eurocontrol Specification for On-Line Data Interchange (OLDI) (3) | 16.1.2008 |

Organisation

Reference

Edition number

Title of the Community specifications

Edition date

Eurocontrol (2)

2

Spec-0106

4.1

Eurocontrol Specification for On-Line Data Interchange (OLDI) (3)

3

16.1.2008

---

(1)  OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p. 26.

1

(2)  European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation: Rue de la Fusée 96, B-1130 Brussels, tel. (32-2) 729 90 11, fax (32-2) 729 51 90.

2

(3)  http://www.eurocontrol.int/ses/public/standard_page/sk_community_specs_completed.html

3

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

THOMAS CHIDESTER, ) 

 ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 

 Plaintiff, ) 2:14-cv-13061-JCO-MJH 

 ) 

v. ) 

 ) 

AMCOL SYSTEMS, INC., ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

__________________________________ ) 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

 COME NOW, all parties of record that have made an appearance in this 

action and file this Stipulation for Dismissal without Prejudice by which all parties 

stipulate to the dismissal of all claims asserted in this action pursuant to Rule 

41(a)(1)(A)(ii), all parties to bear their own attorney fees and costs related to those 

claims. 

 SO ORDERED. 

Date: March 5, 2015 s/John Corbett O’Meara 

 United States District Judge 

Case 5:14-cv-13061-JCO-MJH ECF No. 10 filed 03/05/15 PageID.40 Page 1 of 2
Respectfully submitted this 4th day of March, 2015. 

LEMBERG LAW, LLC 

/s/ Sergei Lemberg 

Sergei Lemberg 

1100 Summer Street 

Stamford, Connecticut 06095 

slemberg@lemberglaw.com

Telephone: (203) 653-2250 

Counsel for Plaintiff

VARNUM, LLP 

/s/ Randall J. Groendyk 

Randall J. Groendyk 

Bar No: 

Bridgewater Place 

P.O. Box 352 

Grand Rapids, Michigan 

49501-0352 

rjgroendyk@varnumlaw.com

Telephone: (616) 336-6573 

Counsel for Defendant 

Case 5:14-cv-13061-JCO-MJH ECF No. 10 filed 03/05/15 PageID.41 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Uli Hacksell, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the
Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.



|                   |  |  |  |                                           
|------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2010 |  |  |  | /S/ ULI HACKSELL                          
|                   |  |  |  | Uli Hacksell, Ph.D.Chief Executive Officer

This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or
the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to
the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2062 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2062

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 8, 2009

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Migratory Bird Treaty Act to provide for penalties and 
 enforcement for intentionally taking protected avian species, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Migratory Bird Treaty Act Penalty 
and Enforcement Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT OF MIGRATORY BIRD TREATY ACT.

    Section 6 of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 707) is 
amended by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e), and by 
inserting after subsection (c) the following new subsection:
    ``(d)(1) Except in the case of hunting and other activity allowed 
under section 3, whoever in violation of this Act kills or wounds a 
migratory bird in an aggravated manner shall, in lieu of any penalty 
for such violation--
            ``(A) for the first violation, be fined under title 18, 
        United States Code, imprisoned for not more than one year, or 
        both; and
            ``(B) for the second and any subsequent violation, be fined 
        under title 18 of the United States Code, imprisoned for not 
        more than 2 years, or both.
    ``(2) The authority under section 3(k) of the Fish and Wildlife 
Improvement Act of 1978 (16 U.S.C. 742l(k)) applies with respect to a 
violation described in paragraph (1).
    ``(3) For the purposes of this subsection the term `aggravated 
manner' means deliberately and in a manner that--
            ``(A) demonstrates indifference to the pain and suffering 
        of the bird; or
            ``(B) involves actions that would shock a reasonable 
        person.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 7, 2009.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William W. Harrod, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                      |  |     |  |                              
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------
|DATE: August 11, 2006 |  | BY: |  | /s/ William W. Harrod        
|                      |  |     |  | William W. Harrod            
|                      |  |     |  | President and Chief          
|                      |  |     |  | Executive Officer            
|                      |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Nextera Enterprises, Inc.
(the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

            (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Act of 1934, as amended; and

            (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 16, 2004

                                  By: /s/ Michael P. Muldowney
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  President and Chief Financial Officer
                                  (Principal Executive Officer and Principal
                                  Financial Officer)

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
Case 2:14-cr-20655-MOB-MKM ECF No. 38, PageID.133 Filed 11/12/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:14-cr-20655-MOB-MKM ECF No. 38, PageID.134 Filed 11/12/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:14-cr-20655-MOB-MKM ECF No. 38, PageID.135 Filed 11/12/20 Page 3 of 3
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 4, 2015

NO. 03-13-00762-CV

Fakhrealam Atiq, Appellant

v.

CoTechno Group, Inc., Appellee

APPEAL FROM 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

REVERSED AND RENDERED ON REHEARING-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment rendered by the trial court on October 23, 2013. The 

Court’s opinion and judgment dated July 9, 2015, are withdrawn. Having reviewed the record 

and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the trial court’s 

judgment. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s judgment and renders judgment 

dismissing appellee’s claims against appellant for want of personal jurisdiction. Appellee shall 

pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.406 Design loads for cargo tanks and fixtures: General. ( a ) Calculations must show that a cargo tank and its fixtures are designed for the following loads: ( 1 ) Internal pressure head.
( 2 ) External pressure load.
( 3 ) Dynamic loads resulting from the motion of the vessel.
( 4 ) Transient or stationary thermal loads if the design temperature is colder than −55 °C (−67 °F) or causes thermal stresses in cargo tank supports.
( 5 ) Sloshing loads, if the cargo tank is designed for partial loads.
( 6 ) Loads resulting from vessel's deflection.
( 7 ) Tank weight, cargo weight, and corresponding support reaction.
( 8 ) Insulation weight.
( 9 ) Loads of a pipe tower and any other attachments to the cargo tank.
( 10 ) Vapor pressure loads in harbor conditions allowed under § 154.405.
( 11 ) Gas pressurization if the cargo tank is designed for gas pressurization as a means of cargo transfer.
( b ) A cargo tank must be designed for the most unfavorable static heel angle within a 0° to 30° range without exceeding the allowable stress of the material.
( c ) A hydrostatic or hydropneumatic test design load must be specially approved by the Commandant (CG-ENG).
[CGD 74-289, 44 FR 26009, May 3, 1979, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4782, Feb. 3, 1983; USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58284, Sept. 29, 2014]
#### § 144.135 Verification of compliance with design standards.

Verification of compliance with the construction and arrangement design standards of this part must be performed according to the following table:

| If the vessel is— | Then the applicable requirements must be met— |
| --- | --- |
| (a) A new vessel, | Before the COI is issued. |
| (b) A vessel to undergo a major conversion or alteration to the hull, machinery, or equipment that may affect the vessel's safety, | Before the major conversion or alteration is performed. |
| (c) A vessel on which a new installation that is not a “replacement in kind”, | Before the new installation is performed. |

Table 144.135—Verification of Compliance With Design Standards

[USCG-2006-24412, 81 FR 40101, June 20, 2016; 81 FR 47312, July 21, 2016]
#### § 108.486 Helicopter decks.

At least two of the accesses to the helicopter landing deck must each have a fire hydrant on the unit's fire main system located next to them.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2180 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  Union Calendar No. 81
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2180

                          [Report No. 111-163]

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to waive housing loan fees for 
 certain veterans with service-connected disabilities called to active 
                                service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2009

Mr. Teague (for himself and Mr. Filner) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

                             June 18, 2009

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to waive housing loan fees for 
 certain veterans with service-connected disabilities called to active 
                                service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF HOUSING LOAN FEE FOR CERTAIN VETERANS WITH 
              SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITIES CALLED TO ACTIVE SERVICE.

    Section 3729(c)(1) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after ``retirement pay'' the following: ``or active service 
pay''.
                                                  Union Calendar No. 81

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2180

                          [Report No. 111-163]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to waive housing loan fees for 
 certain veterans with service-connected disabilities called to active 
                                service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 18, 2009

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
#### The Bowery Savings Bank, *Plaintiff, v.*John Keenan and others, *Defendants*.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; report of referee set aside and new hearing ordered before another referee. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
§ 263.13 Is there a limit on the amount of Federal TANF funds that a State may spend on administrative costs? ( a ) (i) Yes, a State may not spend more than 15 percent of the amount that it receives as its adjusted SFAG, or under other provisions of section 403 of the Act, on “administrative costs,” as defined at § 263.0(b). (ii) Any violation of the limitation in paragraph (a)(i) of this section will constitute a misuse of funds under § 263.11(b).
( b ) Expenditures on the information technology and computerization needed for tracking and monitoring required by or under part IV-A of the Act do not count towards the limit specified in paragraph (a) of this section. ( 1 ) This exclusion covers the costs for salaries and benefits of staff who develop, maintain, support or operate the portions of information technology or computer systems used for tracking and monitoring.
( 2 ) It also covers the costs of contracts for development, maintenance. support, or operation of those portions of information technology or computer systems used for tracking or monitoring.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

ANITA WISE WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO: 14-CV-13944-DT

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the court on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge David R. Grand pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. The magistrate judge issued his report

on May 31, 2016 recommending that this court grant the Commissioner’s motion for

summary judgment and affirm the ALJ’s decision. No objections have been filed

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived.1

Having reviewed the file and the Report, the court concludes that the findings

and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and ADOPTS the same for

purposes of this Order.

 1The failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the court from its duty to independently

review the motion. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). 

2:14-cv-13944-RHC-DRG Doc # 23 Filed 06/30/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 581
ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report

and Recommendation, the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED

and the Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: June 30, 2016

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

and/or pro se parties on this date, June 30, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

2

2:14-cv-13944-RHC-DRG Doc # 23 Filed 06/30/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 582
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.908 Inert gas generator: Location. ( a ) Except as allowed in paragraph (b) of this section, an inert gas generator must be located in the main machinery space or a space that is not in the cargo area and does not have direct access to any accommodation, service, or control space.
( b ) An inert gas generator that does not use flame burning equipment may be located in the cargo area if specially approved by the Commandant (CG-OES).
[CGD 74-289, 44 FR 26009, May 3, 1979, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4782, Feb. 3, 1983]
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2004 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2004

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 4282 Beach Street in Akron, Michigan, as the ``Akron Veterans 
                        Memorial Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2009

  Mr. Kildee introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 4282 Beach Street in Akron, Michigan, as the ``Akron Veterans 
                        Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AKRON VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4282 Beach Street in Akron, Michigan, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Akron Veterans Memorial Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Akron 
Veterans Memorial Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50783

Summary Calendar

UNTIED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

RUBEN ENRIQUEZ-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

(EP-96-CR-365)

July 1, 1997

Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Appellant, Ruben Enriquez-Hernandez ("Enriquez") appeals

his conviction for possession of marijuana. Enriquez contends that

there was not sufficient evidence for the jury to find that he knew

that marijuana was hidden in the truck he drove. We have reviewed

the briefs and the record, and conclude that the record is not

devoid of evidence that Enriquez knew the marijuana was hidden in

the car. See United States v. Pierre, 958 F.2d 1304, 1310-11 (5th
Cir. 1992) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.
§ 119.470 Ventilation of spaces containing diesel fuel tanks. ( a ) Unless provided with ventilation that complies with § 119.465 of this part, a space containing a diesel fuel tank and no machinery must meet one of the following requirements: ( 1 ) A space of 14 cubic meters (500 cubic feet) or more in volume must have a gooseneck vent of not less than 65 millimeters (2.5 inches) in diameter; or
( 2 ) A space of less than 14 cubic meters (500 cubic feet) in volume must have a gooseneck vent of not less than 40 millimeters (1.5 inches) in diameter.
( b ) Vent openings may not be located adjacent to possible sources of vapor ignition.