alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.1760 Liquid ammonia.

The master shall ensure that no person sprays liquid ammonia into a cargo tank containing more than 8% oxygen by volume.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
Data Series 527
EAARL Coastal       Topography�Eastern Florida, Post-Hurricane Frances, 2004: First       Surface
Collaborators

Funding for this project was provided by       the U.S. Geological Survey - Coastal and Marine       Geology Program.

U.S. Geological Survey

St. Petersburg Coastal and             Marine Science Center

National Aeronautics             and Space Administration

Wallops Flight Facility

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey URL: pubs.usgs.gov /ds/527/html/collaborators.htmlPage Contact Information: FeedbackPage Last Modified: Monday, 30-Aug-2010 07:27:07 EDT
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Premier Farnell plc (the "Company") on
Form 20-F for the year ended February 2, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned
officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such
officer's knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  expressed in the Report.

Date:  June 16, 2003
                                 /s/ JOHN R. HIRST
                                 ---------------------------------------------
                                 John R. Hirst
                                 Chief Executive (principal executive officer)

                                /s/ ANDREW C. FISHER
                                ---------------------------------------------
                                Andrew C. Fisher
                                Finance Director (principal financial officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Premier Farnell plc and will be retained by Premier Farnell plc and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.031-5 Approval and production tests. ( a ) *Approval test.* An independent laboratory accepted by the Commandant under § 159.010 of this chapter must test an appliance in accordance with the operational test in paragraph (c) of this section.
( b ) *Production inspections and tests.* Production inspections and tests of each appliance must be conducted under the procedures in § 159.007 of this chapter. Each appliance which fails the inspections and tests must not be represented as meeting this Subpart or as being approved by the Coast Guard. ( 1 ) *Inspections and tests by the manufacturer.* The manufacturer's quality control procedures must include the inspection of appliances during production as well as inspection of finished appliances to determine that the appliances are being produced in accordance with the approved plans. Each appliance must be tested in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section except that the projectile may be fired without a service line attached, and the distance and deviation do not have to be measured.
( 2 ) *Inspections and test by an independent laboratory.* An independent laboratory accepted by the Commandant under § 159.010 of this chapter must inspect and test one appliance at least once each year. The inspection must determine that the appliances are being produced in accordance with the approved plans. The test must be in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section.
( c ) *Operational test.* The operational test must be conducted as follows: ( 1 ) Three rounds must be fired by the gun, at least one of which must be with a service line attached to a projectile.
( 2 ) The projectile must be fired first by aiming it down an open course, and measuring the distance and deviation of the projectile.
( 3 ) After the projectile is fired, the other two rounds must be fired.
( 4 ) The distance and deviation of the projectile must be in accordance with § 160.031-3(d) the gun must fire each round properly and the gun must not be fractured or damaged by the test.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.115-17 Marking and labeling. ( a ) Each winch must be marked with a plate or label permanently affixed in a conspicuous place readily accessible for inspection and sufficiently durable to withstand continuous exposure to environmental conditions at sea for the life of the winch.
( b ) The plate or label must be in English, but may also be in other languages.
( c ) The plate or label must contain the— ( 1 ) Name and address of the manufacturer;
( 2 ) Manufacturer's model identification;
( 3 ) Name of the independent laboratory that witnessed the prototype or production tests;
( 4 ) Serial number of the winch;
( 5 ) U.S. Coast Guard approval number;
( 6 ) Month and year of manufacture;
( 7 ) Safe working load of the winch; and
( 8 ) Word “SOLAS”.
# C_2008138EN.01001801.xml

| 5.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/18

---

List of ports where landing or transhipping is allowed of frozen fish caught by third-country fishing vessels in the North-East Atlantic Fisheries Convention Area

(2008/C 138/09)

The publication of the list (1) is based on Article 36 of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/2008 of 16 January 2008 fixing for 2008 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required (2).

1

2

| Member State | Designated Ports |
| --- | --- |
| Denmark | Esbjerg
  Fredericia
  Hanstholm
  Hirtshals
  København
  Skagen
  Ålborg
  Århus |
| Germany | Hamburg
  Cuxhaven
  Bremerhaven
  Sassnitz
  Rostock |
| Spain | Vigo port area
  Marin |
| France | Boulogne-sur-Mer
  Brest
  Douarnenez
  Concarneau
  Nantes-St Nazaire |
| Ireland | Killybegs (3) |
| Latvia | Riga
  Liepaja
  Ventspils |
| Lithuania | Klaipeda |
| Netherlands | Eemshaven
  Ijmuiden
  Harlingen
  Velsen-Noord
  Vlissingen
  Scheveningen (3) |
| Poland | Gdynia
  Świnoujście
  Szczecin |
| Portugal | Lisbon port
  Leixões
  Aveiro
  Setúbal
  Madeira
  Funchal
  Azores
  Ponta Delgada, Ilha de S. Miguel
  Horta, Ilha do Faial
  Praia da Vitória, Ilha Terceira (3) |
| Sweden | Gothenburg |
| United Kingdom | Grimsby
  Hull
  Immingham
  Peterhead
  Aberdeen (3)

  Fraserburgh (3)

  Lerwick (3)

  Scrabster (3)

  Kinlochbervie (3)

  Lochinver (3)

  Ullapool (3) |

Member State

Designated Ports

Denmark

Esbjerg

Fredericia

Hanstholm

Hirtshals

København

Skagen

Ålborg

Århus

Germany

Hamburg

Cuxhaven

Bremerhaven

Sassnitz

Rostock

Spain

Vigo port area

Marin

France

Boulogne-sur-Mer

Brest

Douarnenez

Concarneau

Nantes-St Nazaire

Ireland

Killybegs (3)

3

Latvia

Riga

Liepaja

Ventspils

Lithuania

Klaipeda

Netherlands

Eemshaven

Ijmuiden

Harlingen

Velsen-Noord

Vlissingen

Scheveningen (3)

3

Poland

Gdynia

Świnoujście

Szczecin

Portugal

Lisbon port

Leixões

Aveiro

Setúbal

Madeira

Funchal

Azores

Ponta Delgada, Ilha de S. Miguel

Horta, Ilha do Faial

Praia da Vitória, Ilha Terceira (3)

3

Sweden

Gothenburg

United Kingdom

Grimsby

Hull

Immingham

Peterhead

Aberdeen (3)

3

Fraserburgh (3)

3

Lerwick (3)

3

Scrabster (3)

3

Kinlochbervie (3)

3

Lochinver (3)

3

Ullapool (3)

3

---

(1)  The list with more detailed information is also available on the websites of the Commission and NEAFC.

1

(2)  OJ L 19, 23.1.2008, p. 1.

2

(3)  Not an EU Border Inspection Post (BIP).

3

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1906 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1906

To permanently prohibit oil and gas leasing off the coast of the State 
                 of California, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 2, 2009

Mrs. Capps (for herself, Mr. Thompson of California, Mr. George Miller 
of California, Mr. Farr, Mr. Waxman, Mr. Berman, Mr. Stark, Mr. Schiff, 
 Ms. Lee of California, Ms. Harman, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Honda, Ms. Eshoo, 
     Ms. Matsui, Mrs. Davis of California, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mrs. 
 Napolitano, Ms. Watson, Ms. Waters, Mr. Becerra, Ms. Richardson, Mr. 
Filner, Ms. Speier, Mrs. Tauscher, Mr. Sherman, Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of 
   California, Ms. Loretta Sanchez of California, Ms. Zoe Lofgren of 
California, and Mr. McNerney) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permanently prohibit oil and gas leasing off the coast of the State 
                 of California, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``California Ocean and Coastal 
Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN CERTAIN AREAS OF THE 
              OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.

    Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(q) Prohibition of Oil and Gas Leasing in Certain Areas of the 
Outer Continental Shelf.--
            ``(1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        this Act or any other law and except as provided in paragraph 
        (2), beginning on the date of enactment of this subsection, the 
        conduct of oil and gas preleasing, leasing, and related 
        activities is prohibited in areas of the outer Continental 
        Shelf located off the coast of the State of California.
            ``(2) Effect.--Nothing in this subsection affects any 
        rights under leases issued under this Act before the date of 
        enactment of this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
EX-10.1





 Exhibit 10.1 

Amendment to the Precigen, Inc. Amended and Restated 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as Amended 

The first paragraph of Section 6.02 of the Precigen, Inc. Amended and Restated 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan is amended to read as follows: 

“6.02 Aggregate Limit 
 The maximum
aggregate number (the “Maximum Aggregate Number”) of shares of Common Stock which may be subject to Awards under this Plan is 27,000,000 shares of Common Stock.”
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN RE: TODD ALLEN KAZMIERCZAK,

and AMY LYNN KAZMIERCZAK,

Appellants,

CASE NO. 14-cv-14786

v. HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH

FINANCIAL PACIFIC LEASING, INC.

Appellees.

 /

ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

In this bankruptcy appeal, appellants’ brief was required to be filed on February 5,

2015. Appellants have not filed their brief nor requested an adjournment to do so. 

Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. On February 24, 2015,

this court ordered appellants to cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed for

failure to prosecute on or before March 9, 2015. Appellants have failed to respond to the

court’s show cause order and the time period for doing so has expired. Accordingly,

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rule 41.2, this case is

DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 11, 2015

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

March 11, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marcia Beauchemin

Deputy Clerk

2:14-cv-14786-GCS-MJH Doc # 7 Filed 03/11/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 234
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
PowerCerv Corporation

We have issued our reports dated January 23, 2001, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of
PowerCerv Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000. We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the
Registration Statements of PowerCerv Corporation on Forms S-8 (File No.
333-3960, File no. 333-50621, and File No. 333-90825.


                                            /s/ Grant Thornton, LLP


Tampa, Florida
April 13, 2001
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****� United States--east coast, Virginia, Pamunkey and Mattaponi Rivers[and] York River, Yorktown to West Point [electronic resource].**
 
p0|p1|
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.418/7:12243/984

Item Number: 0191-B-13(online)

CGP systemNumber:000861638
August 17, 2018
**Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 September 2012 — Brighton Collectibles v OHIM**

**(Case C-624/11 P)**

Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulations (EC) No 40/94 and (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(4) — Community word mark BRIGHTON — Opposition proceedings — Interpretation of the provisions of national law on relative grounds for refusal of registration

1.                     *Appeal — Grounds — Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments raised before the General Court — Failure to identify the error
of law relied on –Not addmissible (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure
of the Court of Justice, Art. 112(1)(c)) (see paras 34, 35)*

2.                     *Appeal — Grounds — Review by the Court of the assessment made of the facts and evidence — Possible only where the clear sense
of the evidence has been distorted (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.) (see paras 43-45)*

3.                     *Appeal — Grounds — Ground raised for the first time on appeal — Not admissible (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58,
first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 113(2)) (see para. 53)*

**Re:**

| | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 September 2011 in Case T-403/10 | Brighton Collectibles | v | OHIM | — | Felmar | , by which the General Court dismissed the action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 June 2010 (Case R 408/2009-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Brighton Collectibles, Inc. and Felmar — Article 8(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1) — Community word mark BRIGHTON — Opposition proceedings based on earlier national word and figurative marks — Failure to give sufficient reasons with regard to the national laws relied upon |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The appeal is dismissed. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Brighton Collectibles, Inc. is ordered to pay the costs. |
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael C. Frederick, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                   |  |     |  |                                                             
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|DATE: May 12, 2010 |  | BY: |  | /s/ Michael C. Frederick                                    
|                   |  |     |  | Michael C. Frederick                                        
|                   |  |     |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|                   |  |     |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.013-7 Marking. ( a ) *General.* The manufacturer must ensure that each shipping label, and each unit of put-up, is permanently and clearly marked in a color which contrasts with the color of the surface on which the marking is applied. Each label must be marked with— ( 1 ) The manufacturer's or supplier's name, trade name, or symbol;
( 2 ) The unique style, part, or model number of the material;
( 3 ) The thickness of the material;
( 4 ) The lot number of the material; and
( 5 ) The product Use Code or Codes.
( b ) Each unit of put-up must be marked with the appropriate recognized laboratory's certification marking(s).
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1907]



[[Page 19471]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Board of Visitors Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense; Defense Acquisition University.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The next meeting of the Defense Acquisition University (DAU) 
Board of Visitors (BoV) will be held at Defense Acquisition University, 
Fort Belvoir, VA. The purpose of this meeting is to report back to the 
BoV on continuing items of interest.

DATES: May 2, 2007 from 0900-1500.

ADDRESSES: Packard Conference Center, Defense Acquisition University, 
Bldg. 184, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Christen Goulding at 703-805-5134.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public; however, 
because of space limitations, allocation of seating will be made on a 
first-come, first served basis. Persons desiring to attend the meeting 
should call Ms. Christen Goulding at 703-805-5134.

    Dated: April 12, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.
[FR Doc. 07-1907 Filed 4-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00207-CR

Alfred Chila, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 391ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY 

NO. D-17-0773-SB, THE HONORABLE CARMEN DUSEK, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief on appeal was originally due July 15, 2019. On counsel’s 

motions, the time for filing was extended to October 14, 2019. Appellant’s counsel has now 

filed a third motion, requesting that the Court extend the time for filing appellant’s brief. We 

grant the motion for extension of time and order appellant to file a brief no later than 

November 13, 2019. No further extension of time will be granted and failure to comply with this 

order will result in the referral of this case to the trial court for a hearing under Rule 38.8(b) of 

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

It is ordered on October 18, 2019.
2

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Triana and Smith

Do Not Publish
§ 122.720 Weekly maintenance and inspections. The following tests and inspections must be carried out weekly on a vessel: ( a ) Each survival craft, rescue boat, and launching appliance must be visually inspected to ensure its readiness for use;
( b ) Each rescue boat engine must be run ahead and astern for not less than 3 minutes, unless the ambient temperature is below the minimum temperature required for starting the engine; and
( c ) Each battery for rescue boat engine starting must be brought up to full charge at least once each week if: ( 1 ) The battery is of a type that requires recharging; and
( 2 ) The battery is not connected to a device that keeps it continuously charged.
§ 125.103 Tonnage measurement. ( a ) An OSV of at least 6,000 gross tonnage, as measured under section 14302 of Title 46, United States Code (hereafter referred to as an OSV of at least 6,000 GT ITC), must apply all regulations of the Coast Guard that depend on the vessel's tonnage using the tonnage as measured under the Convention measurement system.
( b ) An OSV that is measured only under section 14502 of Title 46, United States Code, and that is at least 500 gross register tons as measured under that system (hereafter referred to as an OSV of at least 500 GRT), must apply all regulations of the Coast Guard that depend on the vessel's tonnage as if the vessel's tonnage were at least 6,000 GT ITC.
( c ) In this subchapter, tonnage thresholds expressed in terms of “gross tons” are applied using GRT, if assigned, and GT ITC if GRT is not assigned.
[USCG-2012-0208, 79 FR 48932, Aug. 18, 2014]