alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 10.223 Modification or removal of limitations or scope. ( a ) If the Coast Guard is satisfied by the documentary evidence submitted that an applicant is entitled by experience, training, and knowledge to an endorsement or increase in the scope of any MMC held, any limitations that were previously placed upon the MMC by the Coast Guard may be changed or removed. Such an increase in scope may include a change in horsepower or tonnage limitations, or geographic route restrictions.
( b ) Modifications or removal of limitations or scope to MMC endorsement(s) under this section will not change the expiration date of the mariner's MMC unless the applicant renews all endorsements that would appear on the MMC under § 10.227 of this part.
( c ) A complete application for modification or removal of limitation of scope must contain the following: ( 1 ) A completed signed application;
( 2 ) Proof that the mariner either holds a valid TWIC or has applied for a TWIC.
( 3 ) All supplementary materials required to show that the mariner meets the mandatory requirements for the transaction sought: ( i ) The mandatory requirements for officer endorsements are contained in part 11 of this subchapter.
( ii ) The mandatory requirements for rating endorsements are contained in part 12 of this subchapter.
( iii ) The mandatory requirements for tankerman rating endorsements are contained in part 13 of this subchapter.
( iv ) The mandatory requirements for STCW endorsements are contained in parts 11, 12, and 13 of this subchapter.
( 4 ) The appropriate fee as set forth in § 10.219 of this part; and
( 5 ) Any uncanceled MMD, MMC, license, STCW endorsement, or COR held by the applicant. If one or more of these credentials are still valid at the time of application, a photocopy, front and back of all pages, and all attachments, will satisfy this requirement. If the applicant submits a photocopy, upon the issuance of the new MMC, the applicant must surrender the old, original credential to the Coast Guard. If requested in writing at the time of submission, the old MMD, MMC, license, COR, or STCW endorsement may be returned to the applicant after cancellation.
( d ) No limitation on any endorsement may be changed before the applicant has made up any deficiency in the experience prescribed for the endorsement or endorsement desired and passed any necessary examination.
[USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11216, Mar. 16, 2009, as amended by USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 77892, Dec. 24, 2013]
§ 131.610 Logbooks and records. ( a ) Each OSV must by statute, or by regulations in this subchapter, have certain logbooks or records. The master shall make all entries required by statute, or by regulations in this subchapter.
( b ) 46 U.S.C. 11301 states that a vessel of the United States, except one on a voyage from a port in the United States to a port in Canada, shall have an official logbook if the vessel is— ( 1 ) On a voyage from a port in the United States to a foreign port; or
( 2 ) Of at least 100 gross tons and on a voyage between a port in the United States on the Atlantic Ocean and one on the Pacific Ocean.
( c ) The Coast Guard gratuitously furnishes to masters of vessels of the United States the official logbook as Form CG-706B or CG-706C, depending upon the number of persons employed as crew. The first several pages of this logbook list various acts of Congress governing logbooks and the entries required in them.
( d ) When a voyage is completed, or after a specified time has elapsed, the master shall file the official logbook containing required entries with the OCMI at or nearest the port where the vessel may be.
( e ) Unless an official logbook is required, the owner, operator, or master shall supply an alternative log or record for making entries required by law, including regulations in this subchapter. This log or record need not be filed with this OCMI, but must be kept available for review by a marine inspector for a year after the date that the latest entry concerns.
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 10/2/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and

PATRICIA ANGUS, Revenue Officer,

Internal Revenue Service,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v.

JOHN I. HARVEY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

No. 96-4062

(Dist. of Utah)

(D.C. No. 95-CV-1055)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before ANDERSON, BARRETT, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The

cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

Petitioner John I. Harvey appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to

dismiss enforcement proceedings brought against him by the United States

government on behalf of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). The district court

denied Mr. Harvey’s motion, finding it to be without merit. We affirm.

In August of 1995, an IRS Revenue Officer served an IRS summons on Mr.

Harvey seeking the production of data regarding Mr. Harvey’s tax liability for the 

years ending 1992, 1993, and 1994. Mr. Harvey failed to comply with the

summons. Subsequently, the IRS brought a proceeding seeking enforcement of

the summons. The district court issued an Order to Show Cause requiring Mr.

Harvey to appear before a magistrate judge and show cause why he should not be

compelled to obey the summons served upon him. The Order was served by

leaving it at Mr. Harvey’s residence with his son. Mr. Harvey filed a motion to

dismiss the proceedings on the grounds that (1) the Order had not been served

upon him personally, and (2) the court lacked jurisdiction over him because he

was not a federal citizen and had not committed an act on federal property.

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation denying Mr.

Harvey’s motion. The magistrate judge found that service of the Order to Show

Cause was proper because the Order was served at Mr. Harvey’s residence upon a

person of suitable age and discretion, and Mr. Harvey had actual notice of the

order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(2). He also found that the court had jurisdiction
-3-

to hear the matter pursuant to its general jurisdiction over federal tax matters. 

The district court adopted the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation.

After reviewing the briefs of the parties, the record on appeal, and the

relevant law, we conclude that petitioner’s arguments are without merit. 

Therefore, the order of the United States District Court for the District of Utah is

hereby AFFIRMED for substantially the reasons set out in the magistrate judge’s

Report and Recommendation, filed on February 1, 1996, and the district court’s

Order, filed March 8, 1996. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Michael R. Murphy

Circuit Judge
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Bobby
Yazdani, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Saba Software, Inc. (the Company) hereby certify, as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended
August 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.

Date: October 7, 2010



By:

/s/    BOBBY YAZDANIBobby Yazdani
Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board
#### § 127.440 Operability of window coverings.

Any covering or protection placed over a window or porthole that could be used as a means of escape must be able to be readily removed or opened. It must be possible to open or remove the covering or protection without anyone's having to go onto a weather deck. It may be necessary to break the glass of a window or porthole before removing or opening the covering or protection.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2005 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2005

To amend the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 
   1996 to require that, in order to determine that a democratically 
  elected government in Cuba exists, the government extradite to the 
United States convicted felon William Morales and all other individuals 
 who are living in Cuba in order to escape prosecution or confinement 
         for criminal offenses committed in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2009

Mr. King of New York (for himself, Mr. Burton of Indiana, and Mr. Mario 
   Diaz-Balart of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 
   1996 to require that, in order to determine that a democratically 
  elected government in Cuba exists, the government extradite to the 
United States convicted felon William Morales and all other individuals 
 who are living in Cuba in order to escape prosecution or confinement 
         for criminal offenses committed in the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO LIBERTAD ACT.

    Section 206 of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity 
(LIBERTAD) Act of 1996 (22 U.S.C. 6066) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ``and'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) in paragraph (6), by striking the period and inserting 
        ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) has proven its respect for the democratic rule of law 
        by ceasing to provide a safe harbor to individuals who have 
        been legally indicted or convicted of serious criminal 
        offenses, including convicted felon William Morales, and all 
        other individuals who have fled from the United States to Cuba 
        for the sole purpose of avoiding prosecution or confinement for 
        serious criminal offenses committed in the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 22
 
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 
APPLIED GRAPHICS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
     Agile Enterprise, Inc.
     Color Control, Inc.
     AmuseMatte Corp.
     Miramar Equipment, Inc.
     AGT Systems Services, Inc.
     Devon Group, Inc.
       Black Dot Graphics, Inc.
          Typo-Graphics, Inc.
        ABD Group, Inc.
        Orent Graphicarts, Inc.
        Ambrosi & Associates, Inc.
        Meridian Retail, Inc.
        Taproot Interactive, Inc.
        Proof Positive/Farrowlyne Associates, Inc.
        One 2 One, Inc.
        West Coast Creative, Inc.
       Portal Publications, Ltd.
          The Winn Art Group, Ltd.
        Canadian Art Prints, Inc.
        Portal Publications, Ltd. (UK)
        Portal Aird Publications Pty, Ltd. (Australia)
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.1002 Definition.

For the purposes of §§ 154.1005 through 154.1020, “gas-dangerous” does not include the weather deck of an ammonia carrier.
ACCEPTED 06-15-00037-cr SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 12/4/2015 3:16:25 PM DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK
```

[112th Congress Public Law 50]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 125 STAT. 544]]

Public Law 112-50
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  4354 Pahoa Avenue in Honolulu, Hawaii, as the ``Cecil L. Heftel Post 
        Office Building''. <<NOTE: Nov. 7, 2011 -  [H.R. 2149]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CECIL L. HEFTEL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4354 Pahoa Avenue in Honolulu, Hawaii, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Cecil L. Heftel Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Cecil L. 
Heftel Post Office Building''.

    Approved November 7, 2011.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2149:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 157 (2011):
            July 28, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 20, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 151.10-15 Certificate endorsement. ( a ) - ( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Certificate endorsement.* The following information shall be submitted, and upon approval of calculations shall form part of the endorsement on the Certificate of Inspection: ( 1 ) Limiting draft for each hull type service for which approval is requested.
( 2 ) Maximum density (lb./gal.) and maximum cargo weight (tons) for each tank for which approval is requested. Their weights will normally reflect uniform loading except that for trim purposes the individual tank cargo weight may exceed the uniform loading tank cargo weight, corresponding to the barge fresh water deadweight at the limiting draft, by 5 percent. Where a greater degree of nonuniform loading is desired, longitudinal strength calculations shall be submitted.
[CGFR 70-10, 35 FR 3714, Feb. 25, 1970, as amended by CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51009, Nov. 4, 1983]
#### § 131.730 Shipboard stowage.

The master shall ensure that no work vest is stowed where any lifejacket is stowed.
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 10.7.5
                                 AMENDMENT NO. 3

                                     TO THE

                        LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS LTD.

                             2000 STOCK OPTION PLAN



         This Amendment No. 3 (the "Amendment") to the Loral Space &
Communications Ltd. 2000 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") is made effective as of
this 25th day of September, 2001.

         Pursuant to resolutions of the Board of Directors of Loral Space &
Communications Ltd. (the "Company") dated September 25, 2001, the Plan is hereby
amended as follows:

         1. Section 3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended by increasing to
37,000,000 the number of shares of the Company's Common Stock, par value $0.01
per share, reserved for issuance under the Plan.

         Except as expressly provided herein, the terms and conditions of the
Plan shall remain unchanged.




                                      LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS LTD.



                                      By: /s/ Avi Katz
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Name: Avi Katz
                                          Title: Vice President and Secretary
#### § 15.818 Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) at-sea maintainer.

Every person employed or engaged to maintain GMDSS equipment at sea, when the service of a person so designated is used to meet the maintenance requirements of SOLAS Regulation IV/15 (incorporated by reference, see § 15.103 of this part), must provide documentary evidence that he or she is competent to maintain GMDSS equipment at sea.

[USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 78008, Dec. 24, 2013]
S. H., Putative Father of A. H., a 

Minor,

Appellant,

v.

A.E., D.E., FLORIDA 

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN 

AND FAMILIES, and GUARDIAN 

AD LITEM PROGRAM,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-866

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 1, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

David M. Gooding, Judge.

Troy Farquhar and Aaron J. Irving of Integrity Law, P.A., Jacksonville, for 

Appellant.

Michael A. Tupper of Tupper Law, P.A., Jacksonville for Appellees A.E. and D.E.; 

Dwight O. Slater, Appellate Counsel, Children's Legal Services, Department of 

Children and Families, Tallahassee, for Appellee Florida Department of Children 

and Families; David P. Krupski, Guardian ad Litem Program, Sanford, for 

Appellee Guardian ad Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-1216 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION 

 Memorandum of Understanding 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and INDIA 

Signed at Washington December 16, 2008 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
INDIA 

Scientific Cooperation 

Memorandum of understanding signed at Washington 

 December 16, 2008; 

 Entered into force December 16, 2008.
§ 136.130 Options for documenting compliance to obtain a Certificate of Inspection. ( a ) There are two options for documenting compliance with the requirements in this subchapter to obtain a COI: ( 1 ) The Coast Guard option, in which all inspections of the towing vessel are conducted by the Coast Guard, as discussed in § 136.210 and parts 137 and 140 through 144 of this subchapter; or
( 2 ) The TSMS option, as discussed in § 136.210, and in parts 137 through 144 of this subchapter.
( b ) Regardless of the option chosen, the Coast Guard is responsible for issuing a towing vessel COI, and may board a vessel at any time to verify compliance and take appropriate action.
( c ) An owner or managing operator choosing the Coast Guard option may use a management system, vessel operations manual, towing vessel record (TVR), or logbook to meet this subchapter's recordkeeping requirements.
( d ) When submitting an application for inspection, the owner or managing operator must specify on the application which option he or she chooses for each particular towing vessel. Owners or managing operators may choose different options for the individual vessels within their fleets.
( e ) Requests to change options during the period of validity of an existing COI must be accompanied by an application to the OCMI for a new COI. If the requirements for the new option are met, the OCMI will issue the vessel a new COI.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

2:14-cv-14-13710

Hon. SEAN F. COX

v.

R.G. & G.R. HARRIS FUNERAL 

HOMES, INC.,

Defendant.

__________________________________________________________________

DEFENDANT R.G. & G.R. HARRIS FUNERAL HOMES, 

INC'S.RESPONSE TO MOTION TO INTERVENE

NOW COMES the Defendant, R.G. & G.R. HARRIS FUNERAL HOMES, 

INC, by and through its attorneys, ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, and 

JOEL J. KIRKPATRICK, P.C., its Response to the Motion to Intervene states:

1. Admit that this action was initiated by the EEOC, denied as to the rest of 

the statement.

2. Admitted. 

3. Admitted.

4. Admitted.

 

5. The statement speaks for itself.

6. The statement speaks for itself.

Case 2:14-cv-13710-SFC-DRG ECF No. 108 filed 09/14/20 PageID.2625 Page 1 of 3
7. The statement speaks for itself.

8. The statement speaks for itself.

9. While this matter was pending before the United States Court of Appeals to 

the Sixth Circuit, Aimee A. Stephens filed a motion to intervene. Defendant 

filed a motion in opposition to Aimee Stephens motion to intervene. The 

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals granted Aimee Stephens leave to intervene. 

 Now that the case has been remanded to the District Court, Plaintiff

EEOC and Defendant Harris Funeral Homes—the parties of record—have 

conducted extensive settlement negotiations. Defendant and Plaintiff have 

reached agreement in principle on case resolution. Defendant has in good 

faith engaged in settlement discussions with proposed plaintiff-intervenor,

but with no success.

RESPONSE TO PRAYER FOR RELIEF

Defendant continues to pursue serious settlement or resolution with 

proposed plaintiff-intervenor. Defendant requests the court use its sound 

discretion in considering the motion to intervene.

JOEL J. KIRKPATRICK, P.C.

/s/ Joel J. Kirkpatrick

Joel J. Kirkpatrick

Attorney for Defendant

42180 Ford Rd. Suite 275

Canton, MI 48187

(734) 404 – 5710

(866) 241-4152 FAX

Case 2:14-cv-13710-SFC-DRG ECF No. 108 filed 09/14/20 PageID.2626 Page 2 of 3
joel@joelkirkpatrick.com

ALLIANCE DEFENDING 

FREEDOM

/s/ John J. Bursch

John J. Bursch

Attorney for Defendant

Alliance Defending Freedom

440 First Street, N.W.

Suite 600

Washington, D.C. 20001

(616) 450-4235

jbursch@ADFlegal.org

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on September 14, 2020, a copy of the above Response was filed 

electronically via the ECF filing system. Notice of this filing will be sent to all parties 

by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing 

through the Court’s system.

/s/ Joel J. Kirkpatrick

 JOEL J. KIRKPATRICK

Case 2:14-cv-13710-SFC-DRG ECF No. 108 filed 09/14/20 PageID.2627 Page 3 of 3