alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012126EN.01002601.xml

| 28.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/26

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 8 February 2012 — Bouillez and Others v Council

(Case F-11/11) (1)

1

(Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2010 promotion exercise - Refusal of promotion - Consideration of comparative merits of officials in the AST function group following their career stream - Obligation on an institution not to apply a provision giving effect to the Staff Regulations which is tainted by illegality)

2012/C 126/48

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Bouillez and Others (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and J. Herrmann, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the appointing authority not to promote the applicants to a higher grade in the 2010 promotion exercise.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay the applicants’ costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay the applicants’ costs.

---

(1)  OJ 7.5.2011 C 139, p. 30.

1

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 151.03-23 Flame arrestor.

Any device or assembly of cellular, tubular, pressure or other type used for preventing the passage of flames into enclosed spaces.
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.012-15 Termination of listing and labeling. ( a ) Listing and labeling as an interior finish acceptable to the Commandant as approved may be terminated, withdrawn, canceled, or suspended by written notice to the recognized laboratory from the Commandant, or by written notice to the manufacturer from the recognized laboratory or from the Commandant.
( b ) The condition which may be the cause for termination of listing and labeling may be any of the following: ( 1 ) When the manufacturer does not desire to retain the service.
( 2 ) When the listed product is no longer being manufactured.
( 3 ) When manufacturer's own program does not provide suitable assurance of the quality of the listed and labeled product being manufactured.
( 4 ) When the product manufactured no longer conforms to the current applicable requirements of the U.S. Coast Guard and the recognized laboratory.
( 5 ) When service experience or laboratory or U.S. Coast Guard reports indicate a product is unsatisfactory.
[CGFR 70-143, 35 FR 19967, Dec. 30, 1970]
# C_2011226EN.01001501.xml

| 30.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/15

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Geldern (Germany) lodged on 24 May 2011 — Nadine Büsch and Björn Siever v Ryanair Ltd

(Case C-255/11)

2011/C 226/28

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Amtsgericht Geldern

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Nadine Büsch and Björn Siever

Applicants:

Defendant: Ryanair Ltd

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does the right to compensation laid down in Article 7 of the Air Passenger Rights Regulation (1) constitute a claim for damages which is subject to the limits of liability set out in the Montreal Convention, by virtue of the first sentence of Article 29 (2) thereof, where it is to be granted because of a long delay of a flight? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the right to compensation laid down in Article 7 of the Air Passenger Rights Regulation (1) constitute a claim for damages which is subject to the limits of liability set out in the Montreal Convention, by virtue of the first sentence of Article 29 (2) thereof, where it is to be granted because of a long delay of a flight?

1

2

| 2. | Is the right to compensation under Article 7 of the Air Passenger Rights Regulation non-compensatory within the meaning of the second sentence of Article 29 of the Montreal Convention in so far as it exceeds the damage incurred by the air passenger as a result of the long delay? Does this preclude a right to compensation entirely or does such a right arise in the event of delays only in the amount of the damage actually incurred? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is the right to compensation under Article 7 of the Air Passenger Rights Regulation non-compensatory within the meaning of the second sentence of Article 29 of the Montreal Convention in so far as it exceeds the damage incurred by the air passenger as a result of the long delay? Does this preclude a right to compensation entirely or does such a right arise in the event of delays only in the amount of the damage actually incurred?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

1

(2)  Council Decision of 5 April 2001 on the conclusion by the European Community of the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air (the Montreal Convention) (OJ 2001 L 194, p. 38).

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       6,420,686
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,268,302
<ALLOWANCES>                                   146,027
<INVENTORY>                                     64,916
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               437,433
<PP&E>                                       2,239,040
<DEPRECIATION>                                 985,405
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,995,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,419,147
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       104,602
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,995,770
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,793,158
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,645,248
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,058,796
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                19,792
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,756
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,418,583)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,306
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,423,889)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.86)
        

</TABLE>
§ 163.003-25 Marking. ( a ) Each pilot ladder step manufactured under Coast Guard approval must be branded or otherwise permanently and legibly marked on the bottom with— ( 1 ) The name of the manufacturer;
( 2 ) The manufacturer's brand or model designation;
( 3 ) The lot number or date of manufacture; and
( 4 ) The Coast Guard approval number.
( b ) In addition to the markings required under paragraph (a) of this section each step sold as a replacement step must be branded or otherwise permanently and legibly marked with the words “REPLACEMENT STEP ONLY.”
[CGD 74-140, 46 FR 63291, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended by CGD 79-032, 49 FR 25456, June 21, 1984]
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Celerity  Systems,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each
of the undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date:     April 14, 2004            By:  /s/ Robert Legnosky
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                         Robert Legnosky, President and Interim
                                         Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to Celerity Systems,  Inc.
and will be retained by Celerity  Systems,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                      B-3
<PAGE>
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

DATE & TIME: WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2017 AT 10:00 A.M. 

PLACE: 999 E STREET, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. (NINTH FLOOR)

STATUS: THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.

FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT – 82 FR 8613

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: The February 1, 2017 Public Hearing on Internet 

Communication Disclaimers has been postponed.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

Signed: _____________________________________

Dayna C. Brown

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission

Submitted: January 27, 2017
# C_2008190EN.01000601.xml

| 29.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/6

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 190/05)

| Reference number of the aid | XT 57/08 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Germany |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Förderung der Aus- und Fortbildung von Beschäftigten in den Bereichen Landwirtschaft, Ernährungswirtschaft, Lebensmittelhandel, Gastronomie, Großverbraucher von Erzeugnissen der Land- und Ernährungswirtschaft, Schulwesen und Gesundheitswesen |
| Legal basis | CMA-Leitlinien zur Förderung von Aus- und Fortbildungsmaßnahmen auf Grundlage des § 2 Absatzfondsgesetz |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Budget | Annual budget: EUR 2 million
  Overall budget: — |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Article 4(2)-(7) of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 1.5.2008 |
| Duration | 31.12.2015 |
| Objective | General training; Specific training |
| Economic sectors | Agriculture, Other manufacturing, Other services |
| Name and address of the granting authority | CMA Centrale Marketing-Gesellschaft der deutschen Agrarwirtschaft mbH |
| Koblenzer Straße 148 |
| D-53177 Bonn |

Reference number of the aid

XT 57/08

Member State

Germany

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Förderung der Aus- und Fortbildung von Beschäftigten in den Bereichen Landwirtschaft, Ernährungswirtschaft, Lebensmittelhandel, Gastronomie, Großverbraucher von Erzeugnissen der Land- und Ernährungswirtschaft, Schulwesen und Gesundheitswesen

Legal basis

CMA-Leitlinien zur Förderung von Aus- und Fortbildungsmaßnahmen auf Grundlage des § 2 Absatzfondsgesetz

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Budget

Annual budget: EUR 2 million

Overall budget: —

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Article 4(2)-(7) of the Regulation

Date of implementation

1.5.2008

Duration

31.12.2015

Objective

General training; Specific training

Economic sectors

Agriculture, Other manufacturing, Other services

Name and address of the granting authority

CMA Centrale Marketing-Gesellschaft der deutschen Agrarwirtschaft mbH

Koblenzer Straße 148

D-53177 Bonn

---
# C_2013252EN.01004802.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/48

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 18 June 2013 — Jargeac and Others v Commission

(Case F-98/11) (1)

1

(Civil Service - Remuneration - Family allowances - Education allowance - Conditions for grant - Deduction of an allowance of the same type received from another source - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

2013/C 252/85

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Bernard Jargeac and Others (Hostert, Luxembourg) (represented initially by: F. Moyse and A. Salerno, lawyers, and subsequently by: A. Salerno, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Civil Service — Action for annulment of the decision of the Commission to consider certain financial aid from a Member State to students in higher education to be allowances of the same nature as family allowances and to deduct that financial aid from the education allowance granted to officials who are parents of such students and annulment of the decision to seek repayment of sums unduly paid.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action, in so far as submitted by Mr Finch, is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action, in so far as submitted by Mr Finch, is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The action, in so far as submitted by Mr Jargeac, Mr Aliaga Artero, Mr Charrière, Mr Clarke, Ms Domingues, Ms Hughes, Mr Lanneluc and Mr Zein, is dismissed as manifestly unfounded in law. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The action, in so far as submitted by Mr Jargeac, Mr Aliaga Artero, Mr Charrière, Mr Clarke, Ms Domingues, Ms Hughes, Mr Lanneluc and Mr Zein, is dismissed as manifestly unfounded in law.

| 3. | Mr Jargeac and the other eight officials or former officials whose names appear in the annex shall bear their own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Mr Jargeac and the other eight officials or former officials whose names appear in the annex shall bear their own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 26.11.2011, p. 47.

1

---
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2180 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to waive housing loan fees for 

certain veterans with service-connected disabilities called to active service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2009 

Mr. TEAGUE (for himself and Mr. FILNER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to waive housing 

loan fees for certain veterans with service-connected disabilities called to active service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF HOUSING LOAN FEE FOR CERTAIN 

4 VETERANS WITH SERVICE-CONNECTED DIS5 ABILITIES CALLED TO ACTIVE SERVICE. 

6 Section 3729(c)(1) of title 38, United States Code, 

7 is amended by inserting after ‘‘retirement pay’’ the fol8 lowing: ‘‘or active service pay’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
§ 126.230 How to obtain or renew. ( a ) A builder, owner, master, or operator may begin to obtain or to renew a Certificate of Inspection by submitting an “Application for Inspection of U.S. Vessel,” Form CG-3752, to the OCMI of the marine inspection zone in which the inspection is to be made. Form CG-3752 is available from any Marine Safety or Marine Inspection Office of the U.S. Coast Guard.
( b ) The application for initial inspection of an OSV being newly constructed or undergoing a major conversion must be submitted before the start of construction or conversion.
( c ) The construction, arrangement, and equipment of each OSV must be acceptable to the cognizant OCMI for the issuance of the initial Certificate of Inspection. Acceptance depends on the information, specifications, drawings, and calculations available to this OCMI, and on the successful completion of the initial inspection for certification.
( d ) A Certificate of Inspection is renewed by the issuance of a new Certificate of Inspection.
( e ) The condition of the OSV and its equipment must be acceptable to the cognizant OCMI for the renewal of the Certificate of Inspection. Acceptance depends on the condition of the vessel as found at the periodic inspection for certification.
EX-10.(4)(1)


  Exhibit 10.4.1

 
 

	
 	 InMed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
 Suite #340- 200 Granville St.

Vancouver, BC V6C 1S4
 Canada

 


  

 
  
  

 
  
 13 April
2018
  
  
 Dear
Eric,
  
 The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
recently conducted a thorough review of InMed’s compensation programs, including salary, bonus and equity position of its employees versus industry standards for both private and public biotechnology companies in Canada and the US.

 
 This letter addresses two components, salary level and target annual bonus.

 
 I am pleased to confirm your annualized salary level of
$140,000, less statutory withholdings, in recognition of your 50% time commitment to your duties as VP of Pre-clinical R&D of InMed. I suggest we revisit this time commitment on a quarterly basis and make any adjustments as needed to best
reflect your efforts.
  
 Additionally, your annual target bonus will
be 30% of your annual salary. Achieving this target bonus will be dependent on several factors, including the Corporate and individual goals for your position as defined on an annual basis. Review of the achievement of these goals will take place
after our fiscal year end on June 30 and the bonus will be payable subsequent to that analysis.
  

On behalf of the entire Management Team and Board of Directors, thank you for your contributions to the Company’s success and we look forward to
achieving more, together.
  
 /s/ Eric A. Adams 

Eric A. Adams President and CEO
 InMed Pharmaceuticals Inc.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-60791 Conference Calendar

WILLIE R. EVANS, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus ROGER COOK, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:96-CV-73-GG

-------------------- February 16, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Willie R. Evans, Mississippi prisoner # 72565A, requests a certificate of appealability to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Because Evans’ petition was filed prior to the effective date of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, his motion is construed as a request for a certificate of probable cause (CPC). Evans also requests appointment of counsel and permission to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP).Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1) (West 1997)

requires the notice of appeal in a civil action to be filed within 30 days of the entry of a final judgment. A timely notice of appeal is a prerequisite to the exercise of jurisdiction by this court. United States v. Cooper , 135 F.3d 960, 961 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. Winn , 948 F.2d 145, 153 (5th Cir. 1991). Evans did not file a notice of appeal within 30 days of the entry of the district court’s final judgment. The last day for filing a timely notice of appeal from the denial of his § 2254 petition was June 30, 1997. Therefore, Evans’ appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, and his motions for permission to proceed IFP, appointment of counsel, and CPC are
DENIED AS MOOT.
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED AS MOOT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             159,442
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    11,928
<PP&E>                                             331,714
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     503,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               47,368
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         5,307,987
<OTHER-SE>                                      (4,852,271)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       503,084
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   164,024
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                164,024
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (164,024)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.03)




</TABLE>