alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SARS Corporation, a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Clayton Shelver,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to their
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Clayton
Shelver


By:
Clayton Shelver


Its:
Chief Executive Officer











Dated:
February 19, 2008





[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
SARS Corporation and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
Editorial Note on Part 162
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 162.017-1 Preemptive effect; incorporation by reference. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 76704 , Sept. 18, 2024.
( a ) The regulations in this part have preemptive effect over State or local regulations in the same field.
( b ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this subchapter with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce any edition other than that specified in this section, the Coast Guard must publish notice of change in the Federal Register and the material must be available to the public. All approved material is available for inspection at the Coast Guard Headquarters. Contact Commandant (CG-ENG), Attn: Office of Design and Engineering Systems, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509. The material is also available from the source listed in paragraph (c) of this section. It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( c ) International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Case postal 56, CH-1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland, telephone + 41 22 749 01 11, *www.iso.org .* ( 1 ) ISO 15364, Ships and Marine Technology—Pressure/Vacuum Valves for Cargo Tanks, First Edition (Sep. 1, 2000), (“ISO 15364”), IBR approved for § 162.017-3.
[USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33886, June 7, 2012, as amended by USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60160, Sept. 30, 2013]
# C_2013252EN.01004402.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/44

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 June 2013 — BU v EMA

(Joined Cases F-135/11, F-51/12, F-110/12) (1)

1

(Civil Service - Temporary staff - Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract - Act adversely affecting an official - Request within the meaning of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations - Request for the reclassification of a contract - Reasonable period - Complaint against the rejection of a compliant - Article 8 of the CEOS - Duty of care)

2013/C 252/75

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: BU (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Orlandi, J.-N. Louis and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (represented: in Case F-135/11, by S. Vincenzo initially, then by T. Jablonski and G. Gavrilidou, Agents, and D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers; in Case F-51/12, by T. Jablonski and G. Gavrilidou, Agents, and D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers, and in Case F-110/12, by T. Jablonski and N. Rampal Olmedo, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the European Medicines Agency not to renew the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Medicines Agency not to renew BU’s contract, notified by the letter of 30 May 2011; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Medicines Agency not to renew BU’s contract, notified by the letter of 30 May 2011;

| 2. | Dismisses the action in Case F-135/11 as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action in Case F-135/11 as to the remainder;

| 3. | Dismisses the actions in Cases F-51/12 and F-110/12; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the actions in Cases F-51/12 and F-110/12;

| 4. | Orders the European Medicines Agency to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by BU in Cases F-135/11 and F-51/12; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Medicines Agency to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by BU in Cases F-135/11 and F-51/12;

| 5. | Orders BU to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Medicines Agency in Case F-110/12. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders BU to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Medicines Agency in Case F-110/12.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 3.3.2012, p. 24; OJ C 209, 14.7.2012, p. 14; OJ C 379, 8.12.12, p. 34.

1

---
Agenda for Siloxanes Meeting 

August 8, 2013 from 1p-2p EST 

Call in Number: 1-866-299-3188, Conference code: 2025642901# 

1. Meeting Introduction 

2. Enforceable Consent Agreement (ECA) Progress to Date 

3. Explanation of the Current ECA Draft 

4. Next Steps
# C_2011347EN.01001401.xml

| 26.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/14

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from Tribunalul Argeș (Romania) lodged on 20 September 2011 — Andrei Emilian Boncea, Filofteia Catrinel Boncea, Adriana Boboc, Cornelia Mihăilescu v Romanian State represented by the Ministry for Public Finance

(Case C-483/11)

2011/C 347/21

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunalul Argeș

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Andrei Emilian Boncea, Filofteia Catrinel Boncea, Adriana Boboc, Cornelia Mihăilescu

Applicants:

Defendant: Romanian State represented by the Ministry of Public Finance

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Do the provisions of Article 5 of Law No 221/2009, as amended by decision No 1358 of the Constitutional Court of Romania of 21 October 2010, infringe Article 5 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Article 8 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Do the provisions of Article 5 of Law No 221/2009, as amended by decision No 1358 of the Constitutional Court of Romania of 21 October 2010, infringe Article 5 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Article 8 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights?

| 2. | Do Article 5 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Article 8 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights preclude national legislation which, in the case of the politically-motivated conviction of an individual by a decision contrary to law, allows that individual’s right to compensation for the non-material damage suffered to be limited? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Do Article 5 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Article 8 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights preclude national legislation which, in the case of the politically-motivated conviction of an individual by a decision contrary to law, allows that individual’s right to compensation for the non-material damage suffered to be limited?

---
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.115-23 Procedure for approval of design or material change. ( a ) Each change in design, material, or construction from the plans approved under 46 CFR 159.005-13 and § 160.115-13(h) of this subpart must be approved by the Commandant before being used in any production winch. The manufacturer must submit any such change following the procedures in § 160.115-9 of this subpart, but documentation on items that are unchanged from the plans approved under 46 CFR 159.005-13 and § 160.115-13(h) of this subpart need not be resubmitted.
( b ) Unless determined by the Commandant to be unnecessary, a prototype winch with each change described in paragraph (a) of this section must be made and tested according to the procedures for new approvals in §§ 160.115-9 through 160.115-13 of this subpart.
( c ) Determinations of equivalence of design, construction, and materials will be made by the Commandant only.
EX-10.5





 Exhibit 10.5 

CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY [**], HAS BEEN OMITTED BECAUSE IT IS NOT MATERIAL AND WOULD LIKELY CAUSE COMPETITIVE
HARM TO THE REGISTRANT, IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED. 
 First Amendment to Game License Agreement 

DoubleU Games Co., Ltd. (“Licenser”) and The8Games Co., Ltd. (“Licensee”) enter into an amendment agreement as follows regarding the
‘Game License Agreement’ (“Existing Agreement”) which was concluded on March 7, 2018. 
 “Licensor” and
“License” shall, under mutual agreement, make the following change to the ‘Article 5 (a)License Fee’ of the “Existing Agreement.” 
  

					
	 Article
	  	 Before the change
	  	 After the change

			
	 5.COMPENSATION.
  

(a)License Fee.
	  	 (a) Licensee Fee. In consideration of the license granted hereunder, Licensee will pay to Licensor a license fee
equal to [******] of the Net Sales of any Licensed Game or Sequel accrued during each calendar month after the date of commercial launch of a Licensed Game or a Sequel, serviced by Licensee (or the third party who concluded the sublicense
agreement with Licensee) (the “License Fee”). The License Fee may be adjusted by written agreement signed by the Parties.
	  	 (a) Licensee Fee. In consideration of the license granted hereunder, Licensee will pay to Licensor a license fee
equal to [******] of the Net Sales of any Licensed Game or Sequel accrued during each calendar month after the date of commercial launch of a Licensed Game or a Sequel, serviced by Licensee (or the third party who concluded the sublicense agreement
with Licensee) (the “License Fee”). The License Fee may be adjusted by written agreement signed by the Parties.


 The contents of this amendment agreement shall apply from the date of conclusion of this amendment agreement, and the contents
of this amendment agreement other than the change shall be in accordance with the Existing Agreement. 
 {Signature Page follows} 












 To prove this, the “Licensor” and the “License” shall prepare, sign-seal two copies of
this Agreement, and keep one copy each. 
 1 July 2019 

 

	
	“Licensor”
	DoubleU Games Co., Ltd.
	
	Representative Director, Kim Ga-rham
	(sealed)


  

	
	“Licensee”
	The8Games Co., Ltd
	
	Representative Director, Kim Young-uk
	(sealed)
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.062-8 Procedures for acceptance of testing facility. ( a ) The Commandant may consider the acceptance of a facility that conducts only the submergence test contained in § 160.062-4(c)(2)(i). Before a facility is accepted by the Commandant to conduct this test, it must be inspected by the cognizant Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, to determine if it has— ( 1 ) The testing apparatus to perform the test required in § 160.062-4(c)(2)(i); and
( 2 ) Employees competent to perform the test required in § 160.062-4(c)(2)(i). Each employee who is engaged in testing a device must demonstrate his competence to the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection by conducting a submergence test.
( b ) Based on the report of the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, regarding the inspection required in paragraph (a) of this section, the Commandant notifies each applicant, in accordance with the procedures described in § 160.062-7(b), whether or not it is an accepted testing facility.
[CGD 73-153R, 40 FR 4422, Jan. 30, 1975]
[Civ. No. 12787.

Second Appellate District, Division Two.

November 8, 1940.]

#### PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION FINANCE CO., LTD. (a Corporation), Appellant, v. SAMUEL E. KRAMER, Respondent.

Ira Ratner for Appellant.

T. H. Canfield for Respondent.

McCOMB, J.

This is an original application for a writ of *supersedeas*to restrain respondent from proceeding with the trial of an action entitled as above now pending before the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County, being action No. 31870 in said court, until the determination of its appeal *462from an order granting respondent’s motion for a change of venue.

The essential facts are:

April 26, 1940, petitioner filed a complaint in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. June 25, 1940, the Superior Court of Los Angeles County granted respondent’s motion for a change of venue to the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County. June 27, 1940, the clerk of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County transmitted all of the papers and pleadings in the action to the clerk of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County. June 29, 1940, petitioner appealed to this court from the order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County granting the motion for a change of venue.

This is the sole question for determination:

*Has petitioner shown this court a valid reason for the issuance of a writ of supersedeas?*

This question must be answered in the negative.  The law is established in California that a writ of *supersedeas*will not issue unless it is necessary to preserve the rights of the parties, pending the determination of an appeal. *(Cunning*v. *Carr,*66 Cal. App. 149, 152 [225 Pac. 481]; *O’Brien*v. *Municipal Court,*140 Cal. App. 362, 364 [35 Pac. (2d) 395].)

In the present ease the only right of the petitioner which is involved in the appeal now pending before us is the asserted right to have the action heard in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. In the absence of a writ of *supersedeas,*this right will not be jeopardized, for, in the event appellant does not prevail here, such right would not exist. On the other hand, in the event petitioner is successful and obtains a reversal of the order granting the motion for a change of venue, the action will be tried in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and this, even though the case may have already been tried in the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County.

An appellate court in reversing an order granting a motion for a change of venue will also reverse any judgment theretofore entered by the lower court, even if the appellant has appeared and contested the same. *(Howell*v. *Thompson,*70 Cal. 635, 637 [11 Pac. *789];*see, also, 25 Cal. Jur. [1926] 918, sec. 50.)

*463For the foregoing reasons, it is ordered that the petition for a writ of *supersedeas*herein be and the same is hereby denied. The denial of the petition of a writ of *supersedeas*is made without reference to any of the questions which may be presented to this court upon the appeal from the order of the lower court.

Moore, P. J., and Wood, J., concurred.
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.900 Certificates and authorization to carry a bulk liquid hazardous material. ( a ) Except as allowed in 33 CFR 151.33(a), no ship may carry a cargo of bulk liquid hazardous material or an NLS residue if the bulk liquid hazardous material or NLS is listed in Table 1 or carried under a written permission under paragraph (d) of this section unless the ship meets the following: ( 1 ) The cargo must be carried in a cargo tank.
( 2 ) If a United States ship, the ship must have a Subchapter D or I Certificate of Inspection that is endorsed to allow the cargo tank to carry the cargo.
( 3 ) If a foreign ship, the ship must have a Certificate of Compliance that is endorsed to allow the cargo tank to carry the cargo.
( 4 ) The ship must have an IMO Certificate of Fitness issued under § 153.12 that is endorsed to allow the cargo tank to carry the cargo if it is— ( i ) A United States self-propelled ship in foreign waters; or
( ii ) A United States non-self-propelled ship in the waters of another Administration signatory to MARPOL 73/78 and the cargo is a Category A, B, or C NLS.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) No ship may carry any bulk liquid cargo not listed in § 30.25-1 of this chapter, Table 151.05 of Part 151 of this chapter, Table 1 or Table 2 of this part, Table 4 of Part 154 of this chapter, 33 CFR 151.47, or 33 CFR 151.49 unless the cargo name is endorsed on the Certificate of Inspection or contained in a letter issued under paragraph (d) of this section.
( d ) The Coast Guard at its discretion endorses the Certificate of Inspection with the name of or issues a letter allowing the carriage of an unlisted cargo described under paragraph (c) of this section if— ( 1 ) The shipowner— ( i ) Requests the Coast Guard to add the cargo; and
( ii ) Supplies any information the Coast Guard needs to develop carriage requirements for the bulk liquid cargo; and
( 2 ) The ship— ( i ) Has a Certificate of Inspection, Certificate of Compliance, or IOPP Certificate as specified in this part;
( ii ) Meets the design and equipment requirements of this part specified by the Coast Guard; and
( iii ) Meets any additional requirements made by the Coast Guard.
[CGD 81-101, 52 FR 7783, Mar. 12, 1987, as amended by CGD 81-101, 53 FR 28975, Aug. 1, 1988 and 54 FR 12629, Mar. 28, 1989]
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.285 Valving for cargo pump manifolds. ( a ) When cargo lines serving different tanks enter a pumproom and connect to the same pump: ( 1 ) Each cargo line must have a stop valve within the line;
( 2 ) The valve must be before the cargo line joins the other lines or pump; and
( 3 ) The valve must be within the pumproom.
( b ) The valve in paragraph (a) of this section is required in addition to any valve required under § 153.283(b).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential  trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals  associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of  personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel, Longitudinal Study Contract.                    

*Date:*                         April 25, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Wilbur C. Hadden, PhD, Health Science Administrator, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, Room 2C212, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue,  Bethesda, MD 20892,                         *haddenw@mail.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: April 11, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-1892  Filed 4-17-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.019-15 Component manufacturer records. ( a ) Each component manufacturer shall retain records as required by § 159.007-13 of this chapter.
( b ) The records required by paragraph (a) of this section must include the following information: ( 1 ) For each test, the serial number of the test instrument used if there is more than one available.
( 2 ) For each test and inspection, the identification of the samples used, the lot number, the unique component identification, and the quantity of the component in the lot.
( 3 ) The cause for rejection, any corrective action taken, and the final disposition of each lot rejected.
( c ) Manufacturers utilizing procedures and apparatus meeting the requirements of the applicable subpart of this part or the independent laboratory's accepted follow-up inspection procedures are not required to include the description of procedures or photographs or apparatus required by § 159.007-13 of this chapter in the manufacturers' records.
( d ) In addition to the records required by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, each component manufacturer shall retain the following: ( 1 ) Records for all materials used in production, including name and address of the supplier, date of purchase and receipt, and lot number.
( 2 ) A copy of this subpart, and other subparts applicable to the component manufactured.
( 3 ) Each document incorporated by reference in the applicable subpart(s) of this part.
( 4 ) A copy of the accepted component specifications and identifying data.
( 5 ) Records of calibration of all test equipment, including the identity of the agency performing the calibration, date of calibration, and results.
( e ) Manufacturers shall retain the records required by paragraph (d)(1) of this section for at least 60 months.
( f ) Upon request, manufacturers shall make available to the inspector or to the Commandant records of tests conducted by the manufacturer and records of materials entering into construction, including affidavits by suppliers certifying that applicable requirements are met.