alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 107
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59780, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 107.401 Purpose and definition. ( a ) The International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, requires one or more of the certificates described in this subpart to be carried on self-propelled vessels of 500 gross tons or over engaged in international voyages. This subpart prescribes rules for the issuance of these certificates to mobile offshore drilling units.
( b ) “International voyage” has the same meaning as stated in Regulation 2(d) of part A, chapter I in the International Convention for Safety of Life at Sea, 1974. (SOLAS 74), which is: “a voyage from a country to which the present Convention applies to a port outside such country, or conversely. The Coast Guard has interpreted this definition to include the following: ( 1 ) A voyage from a country to which SOLAS 1974 applies, to a port outside that country or the reverse;
( 2 ) A voyage from any territory, including the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, all possessions of the United States, and all lands held by the United States under a protectorate or mandate, whose international relations are the responsibility of a contracting SOLAS 74 government, or which is administered by the United Nations, to a port outside that territory or the reverse;
The Coast Guard has interpreted this definition to not include a “Great Lakes voyage” which means a voyage solely on the Great Lakes of North America and the St. Lawrence River west of a straight line drawn from Capedes Rosiers to West Point, Anticosti Island and, on the north side of Anticosti Island, the 63rd Meridian. [CGD 73-251, 43 FR 56802, Dec. 4, 1978, as amended by CGD 90-008, 55 FR 30662, July 26, 1990]
§ 90.44 Compliance reviews. ( a ) Each agency shall provide in its regulations that it may conduct compliance reviews, pre-award reviews, and other similar procedures which permit the agency to investigate, and correct, violations of the Act without regard to its procedures for handling complaints.
( b ) If a compliance review or pre-award review indicates a violation of the Act, the agency shall attempt to achieve voluntary compliance with the Act. If voluntary compliance cannot be achieved, the agency shall arrange for enforcement as described in § 90.47.
# C_2013225EN.01007401.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/74 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/74

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2013 — Beifa Group v OHIM — Schwan-Stabilo Schwanhäußer (Instrument for writing)

(Case T-608/11) (1)

1

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing an instrument for writing - Earlier national figurative and three-dimensional trade marks - Ground for invalidity - Use in the Community design of an earlier sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use - Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision)

2013/C 225/163

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Beifa Group Co. Ltd (Ningbo, China) (represented by: R. Davis, Barrister, N. Cordell, Solicitor, and B. Longstaff, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Schwan-Stabilo Schwanhäußer GmbH & Co. KG (Heroldsberg, Germany) (represented by: H. Gauß and U. Blumenröder, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 August 2011 (Case R 1838/2010-3) relating to invalidity proceedings between Schwan-Stabilo Schwanhäußer GmbH & Co. KG and Ningbo Beifa Group Co., Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Beifa Group Co. Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Beifa Group Co. Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE REGISTRANT COMPANY
BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED) FOR SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED) FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001070242
<NAME> INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS OF CENTRAL OHIO
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,591
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,449
<ALLOWANCES>                                       266
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,047
<PP&E>                                         133,305
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,621
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  82,060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,412
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (139,350)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    82,060
<SALES>                                         36,381
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,381
<CGS>                                           14,197
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,377
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,310
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,729
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,729
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,729
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
§ 159.005-7 Preapproval review: Coast Guard action. ( a ) If approval inspections and tests are required under the applicable subpart, the Commandant takes the following action: ( 1 ) If the Commandant determines from the application that the equipment or material appears to meet the design requirements of an applicable subpart or appears to have equivalent performance characteristics, and that the laboratory meets § 159.010-3(a), the Commandant informs the manufacturer that the required approval inspections and tests may be conducted.
( 2 ) If the Commandant determines from the application for approval that the equipment or material does not appear to meet the design requirements of an applicable subpart or does not appear to have equivalent performance characteristics, or that the laboratory does not meet § 159.010-3(a), the Commandant informs the manufacturer of the reason why the equipment or material is not acceptable for approval inspections and tests or why the laboratory is not accepted.
( b ) If no approval inspections or tests are required under the applicable subpart, the Commandant— ( 1 ) Takes action in accordance with § 159.005-13; or
( 2 ) Informs the manufacturer of additional information required before action under § 159.005-13 can be taken.
( c ) An item of equipment or material that does not meet all of the requirements of this subchapter for design or performance may be approved by the Commandant if it has equivalent performance characteristics. The item has equivalent performance characteristics if the application and any approval tests prescribed by the Commandant, in place of or in addition to the approval tests required by this subchapter, demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Commandant that the item is at least as effective as one that meets the requirements of this subchapter.
[44 FR 73043, Dec. 17, 1979, as amended by CGD 85-205, 62 FR 25545, May 9, 1997]
Editorial Note on Part 161
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 161 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49238, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 161.002-8 Automatic fire detecting systems, general requirements. ( a ) *General.* A fire detection system must consist of a power supply; a control unit on which visible and audible fire and trouble signaling indicators are located; fire and/or smoke detectors; and fire and/or smoke detector circuits, as required, originating from the control unit. Power failure alarm devices may be separately housed from the control unit and may be combined with other power failure alarm systems when specifically approved.
( b ) [Reserved]
[21 FR 9032, Nov. 21, 1956, as amended by CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28292, June 4, 1996; USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48276, July 22, 2016]
#### § 131.965 Sounding of whistle.

No vessel may sound its whistle within any harbor limits of the United States unless it needs to.
###### Editorial Note on Part 147

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 147 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59782, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 147.33 Right of appeal.

Any person directly affected by a decision or action taken under this part, by or on behalf of the Coast Guard, may appeal therefrom in accordance with subpart 1.03 of this chapter.

[CGD 88-033, 54 FR 50381, Dec. 6, 1989; 55 FR 21386, May 24, 1990]
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.1435 Medical first aid guide.

Each vessel must have a copy of the *IMO Medical First Aid Guide for Use in Accidents Involving Dangerous Goods,* printed by IMO, London, U.K.
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 1 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 2 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 3 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 4 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 5 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 6 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 7 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 8 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 9 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 10 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 11 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 12 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 13 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 14 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 15 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 16 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 17 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 18 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 19 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 20 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 21 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 22 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 23 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 24 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 25 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 26 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 27 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 28 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 29 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 30 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 31 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 32 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 33 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 34 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 35 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 36 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 37 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 38 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 39 of 40
Case 1:08-cv-00248-JR Document 2 Filed 02/14/2008 Page 40 of 40
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces a meeting of the DAB-ESGR. This meeting will focus on the status of DoD actions and recommendations from previous DAB meetings and relevant discussions on Reserve Affairs recruiting and review of DoD planning guidance for future mobilizations and targeted communications to employers and is open to the public.

# DATES:

0900-1530 hrs, 26 April 2007.

# Location:

Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs conference room 2E223, the Pentagon.

# For Further Information Contact:

                        Interested attendees may contact MAJ Elaine M. Gullota at 703-696-1385 ext 540, or e-mail at                         *Elaine.gullotta@osd.mil.*

# Agenda:

 

0900 Convene.

0905 Oath of Office (Mr. Wilson).

0910 Review of Last Meeting Minutes.

0930 Honorable Thomas E. Hall, Assistant Secretary of Defense Reserve Affairs.

0940 Admiral Giambastiani, Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff.

1000 Honorable Gordon R. England, Deputy Secretary of Defense.

1015 Major General Raymond Carpenter, Special Assistant to the Director, Army National Guard, Impact of DoD policy changes for future mobilizations.

1100 Lieutenant General Jack C. Stultz, Chief, Army Reserve.

1130 Lunch (Executive Dining Room, #4).

1300 Ms. Kathy Naylor, Director Executive Leadership, Unisys, The Shared Resource-Communications and Outreach to Employers.

1330 Mr. Gordon Summer, Executive Director ESGR.

1345 Honorable David S.C. Chu, Under Secretary of Defense Personnel and Readiness.

1400 Board Discussion.

1500 Mr. Dave Janes, Chairman ESGR, Remarks.

1515 Adjourn.

# Location:

Pentagon Room (2E223), OSD-RA.

Dated: April 6, 2007.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.

[FR Doc. 07-1829 Filed 4-12-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
Exhibit 12.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Sterlite Industries (India) Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the company and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ Dindayal JalanName: Dindayal JalanTitle: Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

Inconnection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of First FederalBancshares of Arkansas, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

a)              The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

b)             The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Registrant as of and for the period covered bythe Report.

 

 
| Date:  | July 23, 2010 | /s/ Larry J. Brandt                      |
|--------|--------------------|------------------------------------------|
|   |               | Larry J. Brandt  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                          ONYX ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                  Exhibit 11.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                        -------------------------------------------
                                           1996             1995           1994
                                        ----------      -----------     -----------
<S>                                     <C>             <C>             <C>
PRIMARY:
Net Income (loss) attributable
  to common stock                       $7,671,826      $(3,762,960)    $(4,081,298)
                                        ==========      ===========     ===========
Shares as adjusted:
Weighted average common shares
  outstanding                            5,159,181        2,241,454       2,158,779
Incremental shares from outstanding
  stock options and warrants as 
  determined under the treasury 
  stock method                             541,334           16,647          96,081
                                        ----------      -----------     -----------
Shares as adjusted                       5,700,515        2,258,101       2,254,860
                                        ==========      ===========     ===========
Net income (loss) per share             $     1.35      $     (1.67)    $     (1.81)
                                        ==========      ===========     ===========
FULLY DILUTED: 
Net Income (loss)
  attributable to common stock          $7,671,826      $(3,762,960)    $(4,081,298)
                                        ==========      ===========     ===========
Shares as adjusted:
Weighted average common shares
  outstanding                            5,159,181        2,241,454       2,158,779
Incremental shares from outstanding
  stock options and warrants as 
  determined under the treasury 
  stock method                             541,334           16,647          96,081
                                        ----------      -----------     -----------
Shares as adjusted                       5,700,515        2,258,101       2,254,860
                                        ==========      ===========     ===========
Net income (loss) per share             $     1.35      $     (1.67)    $     (1.81)
                                        ==========      ===========     ===========
</TABLE>
# C_2011282EN.01001103.xml

| 24.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/11

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Gent (Belgium) lodged on 13 July 2011 — Punch Graphix Prepress Belgium N.V. v Belgische Staat

(Case C-371/11)

2011/C 282/22

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van beroep te Gent

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Punch Graphix Prepress Belgium N.V.

Appellant:

Respondent: Belgische Staat

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Can the national tax authorities exclude the application of Article 4(1) of Council Directive 90/435/EEC (1) of 23 July 1990 on the common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States on the basis of the provision in that Article that it is not applicable in a case where the subsidiary is liquidated, by relying on a provision of domestic law (here, Article 210 WIB92 [Income Tax Code 1992]) which treats a merger by acquisition where in reality no liquidation of the subsidiary takes place, as a merger where liquidation of the subsidiary does in fact take place?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1990 L 225, p. 6

1

---