alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                7
<CIK>                                    0001007008
<NAME>                                   VALLEY FORGE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                             1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         471,707
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                              0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                0
<EQUITIES>                                     2,260
<MORTGAGE>                                         0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               545,968
<CASH>                                        24,565
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                         1,586,471
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                        95,354
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2,368,426
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            1,988,141
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                     0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                         39,928
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       2,500
<OTHER-SE>                                   213,760
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2,368,426
<PREMIUMS>                                   332,172
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                           29,913
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             4,200
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 6,872
<BENEFITS>                                   307,207
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                   11,818
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                          33,505
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               20,627
<INCOME-TAX>                                   7,297
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           13,330
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  13,330
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 266.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 266.60
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                     0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                  0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                 0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                   0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                    0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                            0
<FN>
                                       47
</FN>


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.040-1 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) The following military specifications are incorporated by reference into this subpart: ( 1 ) MIL-R-23139 B, 16 August 1965—Rocket Motors, Surface Launched, Development and Qualification Requirements for.
( 2 ) MIL-R-45505 A, 2 April 1971—Line Throwing Apparatuses, Rocket and Projectile Units.
( b ) The military specifications may be obtained from Military Specifications and Standards, Standardization Documents Order Desk, Building 4D, 700 Robbins Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094, *https://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/ .* These specifications are also on file in the Federal Register library.
( c ) Approval to incorporate by reference the materials listed in this section was obtained from the Director of the Federal Register on September 24, 1979.
[CGD 76-048a, CGD 76-048b, 44 FR 73089, Dec. 17, 1979, as amended by USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60156, Sept. 30, 2013]
Exhibit 4.12

 

RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
 OF
  CORE-MARK INTERRELATED COMPANIES, INC.

 

ONE:              The name of this corporation is Core-Mark Interrelated Companies, Inc.

 

TWO:             The purpose of this corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which a corporation may be organized under the General Corporation Law of California other than the banking business, the trust company business or the practice of a profession permitted to be incorporated by the California Corporations Code.

 

THREE:        This corporation is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of capital stock all of one class, to be designated “Common Stock,” and the par value of each of said shares shall be One Dollar ($1.00).

 

FOUR:           This corporation hereby elects to be governed by all of the provisions of the General Corporation Law effective January l, 1977, not otherwise applicable to it under Chapter 23 thereof.

 

FIVE:             The liability of the directors of the corporation for monetary damages shall be eliminated to the fullest extent permissible under California law.

 

SIX:                This corporation is authorized to indemnify the directors and officers of this corporation to the fullest extent permissible under California law.
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Sterling H. McDonald, Chief FinancialOfficer of Evolution Petroleum Corporation (the “Company”), certifies inconnection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of theCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”)”)pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed thiscertification as of the 27th day of September, 2006.
|     | /s/      | STERLING H. McDONALD      |   |
|----------|----------|---------------------------|--------|
|     |     | Sterling H. McDonald      |
| * * | * * | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 2, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 131209 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, LEONARDO GARCIA, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 131209 COA: 266099 Saginaw CC: 04-053168-CZ SAGINAW POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 6, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH , J., would grant leave to appeal.

d0425 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 2, 2007

Clerk
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA, )

a Florida municipal corporation, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4378

)

WCI COMMUNITIES, LLC, a Delaware )

limited liability company, as successor- )

in-interest for Pelican Landing Golf )

Resort Ventures Limited Partnership, a )

dissolved Delaware limited partnership, )

and WCI COMMUNITIES, INC., a )

Delaware corporation, )

)

Appellees. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed July 6, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee 

County; Elizabeth V. Krier, Judge.

S. Brent Spain, David A. Theriaque, and 

Terrell K. Arline of Theriaque & Spain, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Hala A. Sandridge and Victoria J. Oguntoye 

of Buchanan, Ingersoll & Rooney, PC, 

Tampa, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.
- 2 -

Affirmed. 

KELLY, VILLANTI, and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.120-15 Procedure for acceptance of material change. ( a ) Each change in material from the resin accepted under § 164.120-9 of this subpart must be accepted by the Commandant before being used in any production lifeboat or rescue boat. The manufacturer must submit any such change following the procedures set forth in § 164.120-9 of this subpart, but documentation on items that are unchanged from the resin accepted under § 164.120-9 of this subpart need not be resubmitted.
( b ) Determinations of equivalence of materials will be made by the Commandant only.
# C_2016383EN.01002901.xml

| 17.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/29

---

Order of the General Court of 25 July 2016 — Moravia Gas Storage v Commission

(Case T-465/11 RENV) (1)

1

(2016/C 383/38)

Language of the case: English

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 305, 15.10.2011.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.066-9 Labeling. ( a ) Each signal must be legibly and indelibly marked with the following information: ( 1 ) The manufacturer's name,
( 2 ) The designed burning time of the pyrotechnic candle(s),
( 3 ) The specific signal pistol for which the signal is designed, if any,
( 4 ) The lot number,
( 5 ) The Coast Guard approval number,
( 6 ) Operation and storage instructions,
( 7 ) The month and year of expiration determined by § 160.066-10, and
( 8 ) The words: “Aerial Flare. Acceptable as a Day and Night Visual Distress Signal for boats as required by 33 CFR 175.110. For Emergency Use Only”.
( b ) If the signal is too small to contain all of the information required by paragraph (a) and any labeling which may be required by paragraph (d), the information required by paragraphs (a) (2), (6), and (8) may be printed on a separate piece of paper packed with each signal or with the smallest container in which several signals are packed.
( c ) The largest carton or box in which the manufacturer ships signals must be marked with the following or equivalent words: “Keep under cover in a dry place.”
( d ) Compliance with the labeling requirements of this section does not relieve the manufacturer of the responsibility of complying with the label requirements of the Federal Hazardous Substances Act, 15 U.S.C. 1263.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19
- 0 683 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LYNDSEY MAE LALICKER ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 27 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 21 2020

08/21/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0683
# C_2012032EN.01002601.xml

| 4.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2011 — Häfele v OHIM (Infront)

(Case T-166/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark Infront - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 32/53

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Häfele GmbH & Co. KG (Nagold, Germany) (represented by: M. Eck and J. Dönch, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by: R. Manea and subsequently by: A. Pohlmann, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 January 2011 (Case R 1711/2010-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign Infront as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Häfele GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Häfele GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 145, 14.5.2011.

1

---
# C_2012200EN.01001603.xml

| 7.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/16

---

Order of the General Court of 24 May 2012 — Fortress Participations v OHIM — FIG and Fortress Investment Group (FORTRESS)

(Case T-314/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 200/34

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fortress Participations BV (Rotterdam, Netherlands) (represented, initially, by: L.J. van de Braak, avocat, B. Ladas, Solicitor, and S. Malynicz, Barrister, then, by: L.J. van de Braak, S. Malynicz, R. Black, Solicitor, and V. Baxter, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, Agent)

Defendant:

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: FIG LLC (New York, United States); and Fortress Investment Group (UK) Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: J. Gray and R. Mallinson, lawyers)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 April 2011 (Case R 354/2009-2) relating to invalidity proceedings between FIG LLC and Fortress Investment Group (UK), on the one hand, and Fortress Participations BV, on the other.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | The applicant is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the defendant. The interveners are ordered to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the defendant. The interveners are ordered to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.

1

---
#### MORRIS SILVERBERG, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOSEPH C. MASON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Submitted May term, 1929

Decided June 21, 1929.

Before Justices Pakkeii, Black and Bodine.

Por the defendant-appellant, *Thomas F. Doyle.*

Por the plaintiff-respondent, *Aaron A. Melniker.*

Pek Cukiam.

This suit was brought in the District Court of Bayonne to recover one hundred and fifty ($150) dollars, two months’ rent for premises No. 277a Fairmount avenue, Jersey City. The case was tried by the court without a jury, resulting in a judgment for the plaintiff for $150.

This case turned upon a question of fact. The trial court found that the plaintiff’s contention was the correct one. We cannot disturb a judgment when based upon evidence found to be correct by the trial court.

The judgment of the District Court of Bayonne is therefore affirmed, with costs.
# C_2013189EN.01001902.xml

| 29.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2013 — Greece v Commission

(Case T-294/11) (1)

1

(EAGGF - ‘Guarantee section’ - EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Olive oil - Arable crops - Manifest error of assessment - Increase in the correction due to recurrence of the infringement - Effect of the reform of the CAP on the correction - Proportionality - Nature of the expenditure intended for the establishment of the Olive GIS)

2013/C 189/37

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: I. Chalkias and S. Papaïoannou, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and A. Markoulli, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s Implementing Decision 2011/244/EU of 15 April 2011 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF), under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2011 L 102, p. 33) so far as concerns the Hellenic Republic

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.

1

---
EXHIBIT

ITEM 11

 

StatementReference Computation of Per Share Earnings

 

Primary earnings(loss) per share amounts were computed on the basis of the weighted averagenumber of shares of common stock during the year.  The weighted average number of shares used for this computationwas 1,333,859 for 2001, 1,343,890 for 2000 and 1,286,650 for 1999, and1,273,586 for 1998, and 1,286,480 for 1997.

 

Fullydiluted earnings (loss) per share amounts were computed on the basis of theweighted average number of shares of common stock and common stock equivalentsoutstanding during the year.  Commonstock equivalents include employee stock options.  The weighted average number of shares used for this computationwas 1,553,300, 1,548,591, 1,543,353, 1,521,693 and 1,526,420, in 2001, 2000,1999, 1998, and 1997, respectively.

 

----
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.017-11 Materials. ( a ) *Suspension members.* Each suspension member of a chain ladder must be a continuous length of non-kinking chain, such as single loop lock link coil chain, with a minimum breaking strength of at least 16 kN (3,560 lbs.).
( b ) *Metal parts.* Each metal part of a ladder must be made of corrosion-resistant metal or of steel galvanized by the hot dip process after the part is formed. If the ends of galvanized fasteners are peened over to lock them in place, a corrosion resisting surface treatment must be applied to each peened surface.
( c ) *Wooden parts.* Each wooden part of a ladder must be made of hardwood that is free of defects affecting its strength or durability.
( d ) *Wood preservative.* After each wooden part is formed and finished, it must be treated with water-repellant wood preservative that is properly applied.
( e ) *Lashing rings.* The inside diameter of each lashing ring must be at least 75 mm (3 in.). Each lashing ring must have a minimum breaking strength of at least 16 kN (3,560 lbs.).
II 

Calendar No. 399 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2288 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2010 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To amend Public Law 106–392 to maintain annual base 

funding for the Upper Colorado and San Juan fish recovery programs through fiscal year 2023. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2288 PCS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Endangered Fish Re3 covery Programs Improvement Act of 2010’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF FISH RECOVERY PRO5 GRAMS. 

6 Section 3(d)(2) of Public Law 106–392 (114 Stat. 

7 1604 and 1605) is amended by inserting at the end the 

8 following: ‘‘For fiscal years 2012 through 2023, there are 

9 hereby authorized to be appropriated such sums as may 

10 be necessary to provide for the annual base funding for 

11 the Recovery Implementation Programs above and beyond 

12 the continued use of power revenues to fund the operation 

13 and maintenance of capital projects and monitoring.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 18, 2010. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 399 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2288 

AN ACT 

To amend Public Law 106–392 to maintain annual 

2023. Juan fish recovery programs through fiscal year base funding for the Upper Colorado and San 

MAY 19, 2010 

Read twice and placed on the calendar 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135450(16) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 135450 

 COA: 280560 
 Wayne CC: 06-005650-01

JARROD RASHAUN COLLINS, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 24, 

2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

d0519 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 27, 2008 

 Clerk