PHYS ~C L OESC PT ON W O RKS H EET 

DRUM 

l 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

l4 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

-- -­

PIPPILB # __ 

!I SIZE COLOR/DESCRIPTIOK 

' 

-·-nAn_- · __ ·_·--· · ··- ·- ·--- · 

1 or COMTAII!DS __ 

%FULL %SOL tLIQ 

. 

VES011200 
·' 

6.0 PROCESS OPERATIONS PROC.troURES 

•. Eacb-moY4mll!llt or a..w.aste.withinJ.he_f..,illty, during whi<:h 8J1Y cbanga inlls ~may .. 

occur, makes it subject to addltional ina~lion, ...mpling and anal;yaeo to determine appropriate handlliJg and 

management of the waste. M8J1Y of the 8118l..r- needed for the lrU!Jmnt, storage, and clispooal 1\mcticnsare 

performed during incoming waste sblpment identifiCation. These are not repented unleM It is known or 

b<.fu.rvA<I that the - characteristics have changed during st...-.p. 

Existing Wld 8Jiticlpated operations at tho facility, for which current and periodic sampling and 

aua1y$es lo imporla:lt, ioclude the following: 

Storage/Blending 

Decanting 

lncinenstlon 

The anazytical procedures for each of these are described separately below. 

6.1 Storage 

Bef<M"e tiiX1 wasta are placed into a storage w.lit, Facility ~ent wiiiDSSe$$ the eompatibility 

of the waate with tbe storage unit materials of eonstruction and witb WMtee al:e8d;y atored therein. 

6.1.1 IVa.ote in Containel'l! 

Contalrurized wastes are etored with respeet to ienitibility, reaetMty and compatibility. 

CompatibUlty shall be determined eollliatent with DOT HM-181 guidelines es SUIIli1WiJed in tho 'Segreaatlm> 

Table for Hazardow! Materlale' listed in 49 CFR 177.848 (see Appendix W AP-G). Based on the initial DOT 

1=<1 c1a.>o determination and analysis of tbe =-""'· the drummed waste will be aegregated eceording to 

compntibillty. These materials will be eepanted from incompatible materlale by storage in I!Ogl'egated bays 

within the drum 84rage blliJdine;s. This ls ac:complished by the dAta from the WPS, Mandatory Analyses, 1111d 

Supplementary AnaJ.yses requested by the Pacili\)r Maoogement, Ccmpatlbili\)r segregation will not apply to 

-terial which ba~ been repackaged, generated, or sotidified at TWI. 

To further verity that wastes are ~ properly cat~ TWI wi1 m.titute a Pl'OfiJ1IIll r:L 

CcntaineJ+ud to~ Compatibility Testing. Compatibility will be IISSCIIaed by perforllling a liquid wBBte 

compatibility on tilowastereceivedfor cmt.ainer storageaa outlined ill Appendix WAP·A. Tbl! teotingprogram 

will not apply to mWI quantity packaged chemicals or other material exempted under •U.4 end 5.1.1. Tn tho 

event that a eompatibili\)r Ia performed on maleriaiJ which ere indicated "" in<ompatible per DOT, the 

compatibility test will take precedenoa over the DOT segregation syatem. 

6.1.2 Waste In Thph 

Liquid waates delivered in bulk form (e.g, tank trucko, railroad lank car->, or pwnped from drUDJS, 

are typically plared in built at~ tanks prior to incineratiro. Prior to transferrlqr any Wll8ta intA> a storege 

WAP·29 BEVIS[ON 11 

9/Z9194 

I. 

! 

! 

I 

' i ' . 

VES011 201 
tank, the eompatrollity otthe WMte with the material already In the tank and the tank ID&Ierialo or eooatnlctlon 

·- '!!!' be ~~ b7 ~l;i9'!_14 ~ C:O!!'P"'ft>ii!IY tea (tee Al>l>!'!dlx Vf.J;J._•A). H!. --l.!l!k ~ . 

competibility will be -.1 b7 per!onnlac a liquid wute C<QPBtibilty teet on the liquid ..,.. ~ for 

bulk &tore8e wi.lh lll'\llllllng compooite or the tanka within the eontalnment 8yttam to which the D-- will 

be&dded. 

6.1.3 Bulk So!idl SIO<W 

Built IIOtidl will be lllllllall"d u Collowo for un'oeclina into tbo bulk aolidl pits: 

1) Qnb' material whkb pa-. the paint mter tat ean be placed into lho 111.cnge piU. 

2) The BTU and chlorine contento UMd will be either: (II) Tbe bieber value of tbe 

currem pit or the in'"""'nc Dl8ieri&l, or (b) The IDiderial will be oampled aft.er 

miz!na and the aample will be IUllli)'Hd for BTU and cbk>rine. 

u Decanliq 

In lh• decant.!Ds pt<Xlea. liquid wutea are~ Crom druma or other omall conllliDin into ....,... 

bulk .,.,... UDU. The oppl!reNe Moudatory ~will be performed cm-to be ...._.eel 

Prior to~ a I.Aquld Wille Compol!bllity Tea andopecillc lll""ri9tetltOG a volume ••"at'ed 

aompk will be performed to fllllllrl that -..o to be bulked topt.ber .,.. compat.lble. A "*- 11 •'allied 

IUIIple ia a volume proportioo~Me ~or the intaldecl declm liquldL 

u lDcb!-uotl 

In the incinoralloo p!'C)OM8, liquid. oemHolid and ootid - - ~ b7 hilb ~ ...... 

thMmal ondat!M. The ....Wt.luc - Include cOIIlbulllioo ,...,. that are ec:rubbed to remove I:ta and 

pottioulatH.IIDII other tNMment reoidutol O.e., aeb, -.and ocrubber,ol .... , ecrullber oalida ("-~...,._dual) 

that are fUrther IDAIIAipd. 

The t1'eolt"*lt •"•olinl'~ prccram for indnerallaG fU1 be dMded into two "'i" _.., eecb 

with a apooc:i& purpow. 

o Pmm'rnri ·n·'zaeo COGfirm that the wMie r.u. wllllin the facllic, pennlt _,_ operat~nc 

COIIIInlinta -' o11ow IIDe limine or the ~ operUiciGol cocou.~GU; 

o Trrtmmt &rfdue En/uetlme conflnl1 mcoe.IW -lment ud thai the ebarw:t.eriltia ot 

the ~ ellluct ora IUCh tbM it caD be oant to the nat 1tep (~ diopooal, ar 

further lreat!Dmlt) l:uod upon permit or ~ ~ Reaidl.. Crom on·olte 

~ ollancl ctUopo.l reetricted- will be ..,..,.eel md/o. eYIIIualed,- neecled, 

apiDit the~ treetmmt ll&odlrdol 01' probillltlona. AD~ reoidueoo .. - -

orr lite fer otorap, further ll'ealment, and/or di8pooal will ..... appropriate DOtillcation 

formo (in~ wlih 40 CFR Part 268). 

The applicatiOil ol tbete oegm.ento io diaeuMed below. 

WAP-30 BEVIBION 11 9129~ 

c 

'· 

' ~. 

VESOJ 1202 
, 'I 

'lbe lljlplication of theee oegmentll Ia diacussed below, 

6.3.1 Ptt=l.!!!!l;motnt Analy!e! 

All wutea fed to tbe incineral<ll' are blooclod to meet permit oonstreints and to maintain steady state 

(normal) operation of tbe incinerator. Liquid waalc is blended ln bulk tanko prior to lncineraUon. PreUoeatment Ana!yaet (6.8.1 numben 1·6) are optional for liquid wute ln lanb whieb will undereo fUrther 

blellclina priM to i:lcineration. Prior to lnclnera.tlan, a 1111111ple is dra""' from the tank to be fed and maly%ed 

for the foUowin{: parameten: 

1. Heat \lalue · Heat value is meaaured to control tbe feed rat., of waste fed Into tbe 

Incinerators. Tbe muimum beet value wbicll can be burned per hour is estabtiohed In tbe 

operaline permit. 

3. 

4. 

Alb Content • Alb oontent is meuu.red to control pemml aah of Wliste fed Into, tbe 

eeconclary c:bamber waate burners of tbe illclneratoro. Tbe IIIIJiiJDum asb content for waste 

fed into tbe oeccndary c:bamber II ostablilbed ln the optn.ting ptrmlt. Wh.,.. tbe permit 

llae not eetab&hed a limit, tbia anaiYsla 1rill not be perfOnned. 

Total <Worlne Content · Cblorlne content ia mee.aured to oontrd tbe pereent cl>lorme In 

wute fed into the loclneratora. 'llle maximum chlorine content for waote fed Into tbe 

lndnerator ia eetabllehed In tbe operatlne permit. 

Fluorine Cmte!Jt is meMtD'Od and wred.ln ecqjwlctlon with ehlcrir.e and bromine content to 

determine tbe baloeen eontenl In wute feeda to tile secondary chamber waste bumero of 

tbe loclneratoro. 'llle IIIIJiiJDum halogen content for waste fed into the secondary chamber 

ia """bll~ in the oper$ling permh. 

6. Brgmjne Content is meaaured and used. in 00111unodon witb chlori'\e and fluMiDe content to 

determine the baloll'!n content In waote feeda to the eeconclary chamber waate burners of 

tbe lncineraton. The IIIIJiiJDum beJocen content fM waste fed into tbe leCODdary ebamber 

ia eetabliabed in tbe operating permit. 

6. oH Screen is uaed to ~~ tbe intepity of tank farm materials of eOOII.t'UI:tion and provide 

~~ data fM proper blencllnr. 

7. Soecjl!t Grayitr • 'lllis informMJon is used to auure tbet tbe lpOCifle graority of bulk or 

clecen1 compoeite liquid ia ll!lll tban tbe delign epedfic graority for tbe sfAlra&e lanb (&g. = 

1.6). 

'llle permit operating Y1lluea were eatabliabed lbrcugh a trial burn. 'lbe permit operatin& ...we. may 

be ebanged if it is demonalrated throueh a trial bum tbat the new permit guidelinee allow tbe indJlerator to 

operate witbln the pennit coootralnt Md at a ateocly state (llormaJ) operation. 

WAP-31 IUMSION 11 

9n9/94 

I; 

! 

L~ 

1.· 

I. 

--i-

' 

I' 

i . 

! 

i 

! ' 

'. 

1. 

,~ 

VES011203 
The Fac:illty Management will review the blend aoalYaes to UBure permit !lOIIIpllanee aod to -w-e 

that the blend wil allow eteady stale <i>ol'llllll) opentiAxl of the incinerator. The blend wiD be ~lilted . -··-·-·····-- . --·· ....... ----- ..... . - .. ---···-'"" •· ... -~·--·· . .. -·-·-· -·· ···· --·-·· . ·- --- ---- whenever oeeeswy to meet ell permit spec:ilitat.ion Thia is acoocnpliahe<i thrOIJ!lh tank-to-tank bleodini with 

addit:looal wasta. A Llquld Waate Compatibility Test will be performed prior to ell r.enlt·to-tank transfere of 

tiquld waste. Thia new blend is then «!eted for the blend parameten, which are used to determine optimum 

bleud cbaracteri!tics as ment.ioned In the prevlo\11 paragraph. 

Contaillerized waste ;. ""'l""""•d for incineration IJlrcuih careful indexiqJ olCOI>UDMr feed. The 

parameten neceuary for selection olproper feed oe<JUl'DCe (Heet Value, Chlorine Content) are evaluated billed 

on the Mandatol")l Analy...._ Fc.r the materiala Identified In Section 6.1.1, the ~ oC the above param.Ws 

are ea~ed bued on pbyUal and chemieal compooition information obtained per Section 4.1 and 5.1. 

Contslner feed ~<quenooa relleet an on;olng evaluation of operaliJli ezperionce. 

6.S.2 Treatment l!e!idue Evaluation 

Poet-treatment &Dalyaee aud evaluation will caafirm ..-fW treatmentllld that the cbaraetsriltics 

of the procees ell!uent are auch thai it can be aent to the next step (dlacbarp. dispoea1 or further tree.tment) 

be.oed on permit or proc:ftl c:onatralnt.e. In IIOOOrdanco with oiO CI'R 268. 7(b), residues (or waste~) ruull.ing 

from oo-site tt8tment oC land dlapoaal restricted-are aoalyud and/or evaluated, u needed, acaWt the 

appropriate treetment atandard (e.g., Cooatltuent Co~tralion In W..te Extnot (CCWE) valueo) or 

prohibition. Tbe Incineration~ rewlts In the ~n of the followit1i reoidaes: ash, alllg and aerubber 

system eollda. Eech reeidue hae been thoroughly evaluated to develop a 881llpllng &equency that Ia COillioteni 

and independen' ol the o~ wuteo o<cepted for in<lneratloo. Wutea c.r ~~ reolcNee IODt o!f«te 

c.,. f"uribar tr .. tm.,.,t will be """'mpaniod by the appropriate notjfj(ation (or certi£1cAtion) fOI"IIll. 

Incin<rator aoh and alae ~nerated In the rotary kiln aud dl")l ocrubber aolldo senerased in 

lncinerat>oa UDita numbers 2, 8 ot 4 are oempled, amalyzed aud evaluat4!d on a nsuiar buis (Bee Appendix 

WAP·B, Section 2.2.1) In aa:ordance with analytleal procedurell required to analy&e aplnot the appropriate 

treatment ltan<lard or prabibilion (See Appeadl& WAP·B). 

lDdnarator ub gonerated ln the filed hearth illrineration unila is either 881llpled. amalyzed aud 

eveluated oo a load· by-load buia or i8 reu-eated aud l\llleeqlwltly ...aluated. 

The F..:illty Management will review tbe analytical resu1to and determine the diapoeition of the 

treatment roaidua. IC the analytical reoulto meet the appropriate tree.tment atenclard (e.g., OCWE value), the 

treatment resi:lue is then approved for llhipmeDt. Each shipment is eo::eompe.nled with the following 

documentation: 

Waste Manifeot; 

Land Dispoeal Beatriction Treetment CerUI"JCation; 

Analytical Report or reference to oueb anaJytieaJ delA. 

WAP·S2 REVISION 11 0120~ 

' ! 

I 

i 

VESOI1204 
In the event that the analysis does not meet the appropriate treatment standard (i.e., CCWE valuee), 

the Fadlity Manapment will inveatlpte the samplin;r ~· and the analytkal procedure to enaure uo •.. -- ·· ·•·· -~·· · -~ ,__.. ... ·--- ·· ~., ····¥· ............ ___ , ····-· ow-· -· ........ -· ···-··- --- -- coolaminatlon. TY.o additiooal lllolllpiM will bo Sllbmitted for ano\ya;. oC the porometort which ~ed 

treatment •tandarda in the fir•t roomd or analyals. If the seeond analy&ea pe.as. the resldue will be approved 

for dieposaL If the 80ilrCe of the eontam!notion can be determined, it will be documented. However, if the 

aeoond analyses dc:<!8 not meet the appropriate treatment standard (I.e., CCWE vllluee), TWl will retreat the 

residuea in order to meet the appropriate treatment ew>dard (Le., CCWE .alaeo). t.!tcmati~, 'lWI fMY 

fore~o additional ~ampllnll and anolyN and choose to retreat the residue wblcb <ld not Initially meet the 

treatment standard. 

WAP·SS REVISION 11 

9/29/94 

i 

I 

I 

I 

i 

l 

VES011205 
.. 

\ 

, I ~ 

'7.0 QUAIJTY CONTROL POUCY 

.. - 'l"iYY dev~ ~ p~ p( gl!ftiity !;<l!ltrol llf.11Ctic;~ 1!1\!1 ~ 11!--l! the.~ preQ$911- -

and liCCUllii:Y are llllllntained t.bJ'ou&:hout all of ita laboratories. All site la.bomories are requiTed m participate 

In ~hil pr0£1"8111. Contract laboratoriea employed by the company are subject m inapection and audit while 

peri"~ analylil for CWM. A review oC the contract laboratory Is conducted m ensure ~ the quality 

eontral oC CWM dl.la 13 m&lntained. 

Tbe quaity contrcl proeram illwed on 'HAndbook for ADabtice1 QuaJ«y Control in ware. and 

Wastewater Laboratorieo" EPA, Marth 1979. Good laboratory practices wblc:h eDCOOlpasasampling. sample 

bandllng. housekeeping and aafety are maintained at all leboratoriee. ~ following preocticea muat be 

implemenl..s at all aita lebor&.toriec 

All inatrumentatlon muat be evaluated lhroush the use of an iniiii"UlD<!Ilt check etandard. 

Divergence from ~ bencllmark oritari& requires CCI'!'8CtioL Tbe ioonlment check 

standard resulta are recorded. The record lilii)' abo cont&n evaluation parameters, 

beocbmark criteria and meinteMllee r«<rda. 

llee&'enl blanka are typicelly prepared with each batch oC lllmlplet and analysed to e1111Ut8 

eample contamination baa not OC>:IIITed. Irblanlt anaiYaee do not fall within ..:eplable limlta, 

modification ol reaeenla Qt modilical.ioo ollhe anaiYf.ical metbod Ia implemeol.ecL 

A sample is ~ed in duplice.te typically for each twenty samplee beinl ana!T<ed for a 

particular penmetet'. A blind duplleata sample will be IUbmiticd to tbe laboratoey oo a 

monthly basla. Betu1ta of theae dupllc.ate analyeeo will be reviewed for conaiatency. 

A quality control solution or sample material wiD be anal7zed at leeA once for each &17 or 

-" hatch run to ehow ~ calibral.ion and rtandudization of lnotnunentatioo is wltbin 

aeeeptable limito. Tbia procedure infomuo the 1abcwatory that prescribed prec:isiaD and 

accuracy are being mein~ Beeulla of thele anal,yaee are reported for review. 

Fortifications are employed to monitor recoven.... and mdntain utractb1 Uld/or 

eoooentre&o technique8 at aoooptaNe IevelL Thil procedure prom.. infCit'llllllloll about 

the effect of the sample matrix on the Ollalyte in queotioo. Typirall,y, a ratlo of ooe 

fortificatioo for Ollcb twestty aornplee analysed will be maintained U&uall,y, the MJDe aample 

uaed for the duplicate analyola will be fortllled. 

WAP-84 REVIBION 11 

9/2!W4 

l 

!. '. 

.. 

'. ! : 

: 

i 

i 

I 

:. .. 

VES011206 
~ . ········· 

When availabl~, refere110e materials from the Ne.tiooal InstiiUte of Staodarda and 

'l'eebnol"i)', or reference materialo from any other ~ aource, will be obtAined ADd - - --- - ·-- -- -·- --·· ~- - - - .- --- .. ·-· -·· - ... ....zy..ed ...:rwdlng to normal laboratory methodology to indi<ate 6CCUZ'IC1 cllbe metboda. 

Tbue materia.lo will be analy•ed e.t least quarterly if t.bc pare.m<ter has been performed 

dwi.ng that quarter. l!eferenee matoriala e.re not required for oereenlng metboda. 

All CWM laboratories putlclpate in 'round robin' sample analyRI. Tbeoe samples will be 

submitted by the QAIQC Group ADd will be for the analrsl8 of normal pare.metere. RetouliAI 

must be reported to the group. ~from lbe norma establiabed by tbe ~ority of 

labore.tories partlcipe.tlng will be investigeted and corrected. 

Al.leaat one sample per month is eem to a CWM desi&1'••ed laboral<>ry or a clelijplated and 

appc-oved eonlral:t laboratory for ptll"allel anolyeea. Thew split aamplee or a report of both 

results e.re eent to the Quality Control Unit when an out.alde laboralxlry Ia employed. 

Samples sent to the designated labore.tory will be losged In and ~ed without · 

knowledge or i!lte lab resull.l. 

- The fllc:ility reporto the f"oDowing Information on a monthly buia: 

o Number or aample6 ~ed 

o Number ADd reeull.l or duplice.tee 

o Numbe> and re..Ju of fortlllcationo 

o Inatrwnent used 

o Frequency of occ:urrence for quality oontrol cheek eomple within aoceptable 

limit• 

o Mean and otandard deviation of analyte In queetion. 

The facilil7 al8o reporta intra-lab and round robin reeulta ao they oecur and ...c- material analyoio e.t 1eaot quarterb". 

A wri!tan oopy or any third. party contra~:t laborata-:Y'• quality c:ootrol proetdureo is IUbmitted to 

CWM prior to approval A quality aoouranee impeetlon Ia conducled to enaure that proper recorda and 

document<~ - .,._m and ID8intalned. AD laboratorieo e.re oul!jed. to iMpeetion and &lldit of all proeoduree 

while under contract to CWM. A review of the contract labontory Ia conducted to eoaure that the quality 

oontrol is being maintained. 

WAP·35 REVISION 11 

~/04 

1-

i 

" ;·_: 

I 

J 

I 

I 

; 

! 

I 

I 

! 

; 

! 

I-~ VES011207 
APPENDIX WAP·A 

ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 

[: 

! 

:. 

l· 

I 

I 

I· j 

I 

I I 

! '. 

i I; 

VESOI1208 
APPENDIX WAP·A 

~L~~ P~OC~[)tJ!m.S .. - ..... 

The oUow!Dg~proeedureu e designed to Identify or 80reeii waste. I'bey are uoed by CWM, 

hued upon it.l operating experience, as rapid but effective metllll for estebllshing key decilion paramete110 

portinent to proper waate management. The aoaiyHtl deeaibed in the eeetiOM below are bued oo A8TM and 

"Standard MethodJ" app10Ved by EPA or are bued an procedures and protoeol formulated by CWM an<l """'l 

CWM performance atandatds. Analytical procedures not IJ.IIed below may be added as nec:eeaary with prior 

!EPA approYal. 

It should be noted that the infcrmation ~ in Ibis appendix is ll'!oeric In cbarecter. Tberefore, 

oertain test metho:!oo are cli.ecuued whlcll may pertain to lnalment or dlapooal proc:eaaoa thAI are exduded from 

the facility for which the foregoing waste 8llllzy,.ia plan Ia pre.oented. 

I. UNIQUE ANALY'nCAL PROCEDUBES 

The foUowm1r ~ procedures have been found by CWW: to provide important quaotitative information 

pertinent to eertain pr : : '1 ea. In oome-, thoee teat~ have been deYeloped by CWM to provide lnforo>allon 

not an.llahle &oca 'Standard Methods' In Section n wblcb follows. In ather CMeSo the.oe teets ""' aubatituted 

for 'Standard Methode' wh..., they provide trufllcient equivalent Information. 

B!gclt-Rrtle Tr.oetmem. Eyaluatlan • Samplee oC wastee are combined with aamplea cf otber waatea or ~to 

at. predelermlncd ratloa. Further te.tiDir IIIIIY be required in order to coofinn that the d~ reaction baa 

oc:eurred. 

Cb!orwlumozy Herbpdea by Hlsh Perfonponce Li!!!!ld C!uymatogmpby <HPLQ)· Tbia method (CWM 92·78) 

ie for the analylia o£2,4-dichloropbenox;yacetic lcicl (2,4-D), 2,4,6-trichloropbeooq....&.md (2,(,6-T), and 2,4,6-

tricblorcpb.e~ acid (Silves) in ~ and aolida uai:ol[ HPLCJUV. The oblorophenOlQ' aclda and 

eetera are hydrolyted to their reepeet!ve lllllto by heatinl[ and ot.ining the IWilple with aqueouo alka1L The salto 

are then c:onverted to their reopect.ive acido by the addition or HCI.. The aqueous oolutiOM of the free addo 

are lhon anal)tted lllil!g HPLC 111inJ ultravidet detection. 

Dlaoo!ye<! Su!fidea • An aliquot of waste lo mb:ed with di.otilled Wiler. The oolutioJIIIIUJ1'1 is filtered lhraucb 

filter papeT and the reoultant filtrele Is then aoaJ;ysed for oulfide. Saturated lllltimorly P"'",;"m tartrate and 

1:1 hydrac:hloric add are added and the oolor produced io viluelly compared with standardo. 

REVISION 11 

9/29/D<l 

· .. · 

I 

[ 

I 

I:. 

l 

I' ' 

! 

i 

l 

i ! . 

·.·. ' 

i 

i 

' j. 

VESOll209 
Beat Value by Near Infrared Rel!ectancq !NIR) Speetroaeopy • Heat of~ ia d..wmined by Near 

~~-~Pt. ina re{l:!'*?:"" ~? 1>?' pladnr~ ~~~~In~ ~ 

cell. The lnatrumeot produces NIR abtotbanee spectrum which are converted to a heat of eombuation value 

using a pteYioully def!Ded calibralioll curve. The method firat IIC:J"Hill for llaDipiH to emw:t quollitati..-e 

opectroocopic feature• from the NIR speetra IUld then produces quantitative data for heat of r.ombuation usinc 

multivariate callbrat.iona. 

Metals Screen by :'<·Ray Flu!1F!J!!S!:!Jst OCRJ>l· WilSie oamplea may be prepared. If n.,._,., by grinding to a 

opeeified meoh .U.. The prepared .ample ia placed in a oample holder 11nd posll.loaed for reading. Iruotrument 

output identillea tbe pr-..ce of ,...,era) met.ala for ee~ purpoeeo. Semi-quantifieation of aelected metalo 

ia then possible ... lam·e to matrlz matcbed atandardt. 

MieroWJ!ve Aided D!gert!on • A portion of aemple Ia welabed into an appropriate mlcro ... ve digelltlon veeeel and 

dJae-ted uainlr a mixture of nitric and h,ydrocblorie acidlo. The ~ io t-t.cl in a .mcrowave ... en llllinjr 

progr&IDIDed ttepa to mlnimi ... the poabilily of venting. After coollng, t.be cooteata are dilut.ed to volume, .. IUte.-ed and ~by the appropriate method. 

Orgnjco Screen bv Imm!!!l!!OP'Y · A portion of the wute somple io prepared for lmm\lllOIIOIIM3 acreening 

(SW-846 4010) by using appoopdate aeparation procedureo (e.g., extraction, 6ltraUon, and/or thin ~ 

chrOIIIAtoeraphy). The extract ia then mixed and incubated in a ~ pr<><:e. inble antihody<cated tub6. 

The mecbanica of mixing, incu~ and III008IIriDi lakes about SO miouteo and .-.Ita in a color change in 

o-.h tube. Th~ color development ia bweroely proportioolll to the concentration of the ~~ntibod;y-epeciflc 

~e(a)oflnlereort, e.g., herhicides, pent.odiJoropbe (.PCP), .-w ... ~ lzydroc:arbooa <PARI), 

or total petroleum h,ydrocarhona (TPHa). 

PCB Screen by lmmqnn!!m • A portion of the waate eample ie prepared for ~ ecreenlng 

(CWM 93-81 and 94-82) by pori'ormlng an ex1ractioo with metbanol followed by tlltradon. The oemple eztract 

il then mixed and IDcube.ted in a etep-wille proceea inaide the aniJbo<ly·ca.ted tuba. The mecbanica of llliltinc. 

inc:abating and ~ tekee about SO minute& and ~Ia in a color cb&llfl" in eech tube. Tbe color 

development Ia in~ proportional to the concentration of PCBe and is detec:tad by a photometer. 

Percent Mdity • Reeulta are reported aa percent of CaCO, equivalent or the particular spedfle apeciee if 

known. 

Percent Allr•Hzjtv • Reoults are reported 88 a pe=nt of the specific &lkalloe specie~ (e.r .• CaOH, NaOH. etc.). 

WAP-A·2 REVJSIQN 11 

912019~ I 

lVESOll210 
Qn!s!s r....,..h Eztnd!qq l'rocedure • A dellieJ>ated amount of eample io mixed with the appropriate extraction 

JJ.!!id an<!-...!~ rcx.- ad~ ~~ . ~.r..J!It~~ ~~ pH a!W!'f. ~COI_lta!U ~ ~~ 

usinr the appropriate appi'O\'ed methods. 

WgnrtMty §gem · A aample of-material is pasaed 1'7 a eeiaer counter or autTey meter. RadioeciMty 

levolo Above haclqvound are noted, reoor<1ed and inveotigated. 

Tpnk Farm Caml!ltillili.ty • A--.1 by performi.ag a Liquid Wasta Compatibility Teat on the liquid waote 

received Cor bulk otoraee with a compoeite sample or the tanka witbin !.be containment eyotem to wbicb !.be 

- will he added. Containment uea master COIIIjiOOiite will be made up ooce per Wftk. The """"'f"C 

material will be checlted qa!nat thla master composite. 

Y11!S!f!!!ty • The viocooity of tbe material ill viauaiJy eoaluat.ed ueine water u a reference for low vilcollty. 

Viocoeity ia reported as low, medium, blgh or non·flowable, ete. 

; ) Con!alneri•e<l St.orye Compatjbl!ity • Will be -ed by performine a Uquld Woate Campel.ibillty Teet on 

tb• Wllllte received for C<>Cltoiner olaage as follon: 

L Tbe teet program appllea only to D!AterW that faila the point llltor teet. 

b. A master compooite for ....:h ol tbe DOT buard elMo catep;... will be ....mtaloed at tbe aiie. 

c. Tho - .... .ompooit.o will be made up init.ially by adding 100 mU. ol each receiver ill the c.&leeorY 

to an appropriately sized container. 

d Wbea tbe Deed fCI' competib!Hty veriflcal.ioo 11M been determined, a compet.lbility teet will be 

performed with tbe appropriate DOT hamrd <leu cateeCI'J. 

e. Tbe eompalibilily teet will be performed M fallon: 

1. .In ord8r to OMIII'e that tbe maet.er compoa!te repr-Dtlthe actual plant.wide inYelltocy bi 

~ catepy, the llllllllter compoeite will be IDIIintainod in an~ sized~-

2. A 100 mU aampJe of the incoming ~- will be cbeclted with a 100 mil sample of the 

IIJ'PI:OPflate DOT hezard claN master cot~~poalte uliDg tbe 1iquid compatibility teat. 

8. IC the ~ paMea the compet.lbllity teat, tbe entire 200 wil oUture II added to the 

master compoolto. Tbe receiver is then approved to be otored within aoy of the eQiine 

~ ..,Wnine drums of that DOT buard due category. 

-'· If tbe ree<!iver fails the compatibility teot, the l&lllpie will not be added to the maoter 

com polite. 

6. The receiver will be re-tested againlt oae of the remaini~Ji DOT hazard clua categorlea. 

WAP·A·S REVIBJON 11 

9m/IU 

.. 

,_ 

; 

i 

1: 

.. 

l 

i 

I 

I. 

i' 

VES011211 
lf the receiver iJ not compatible with any exi8tine DOT hau.rd clue ma.oter eompoeite, tbe 

4!'Y!!!f JY!Il.Jle~tlijg. 4~PrYO I!Il.ti! ~.J.I!!It ~CIIIlP.e ~ dit!!!:!ly tp a .. 

proceta area for tnaUD.ent.. 

The testing pi'O£l'am will not apply to IIID8II quantity pedua&led cbemiadi, malerial ~hal bu been ~ 

or .olklifio<l, or cl.b.er mal<!rial exempted under 4.1.4 and 5.1.1. In tho even~ that a compatibility i.e performed 

on materials wlW:h are indicated .., Incompatible per DOT hazard claao, the com~"hility ten will take 

precedenoe over tbe DOT hazard cl8u IIJSiem. 

n. STANDARD ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 

Sample Work Up Teclmlqu.s: 

Inorpnie Tecbllqu.eo 

Acid ~ prooedure far flame atcmic: 

abaorpti.on specl:rC18eopy 

Acid flieution procedure far furnace 

abeorptlon opectroaoopy 

Acid (]'an) Bomb dipetion 

Acid dlge4tloo of oilo, sr-. or waxes 

Dlaaoluilon procedure for oill, KJ"'&&I"O. 

orwu .. 

Acid cipetion or~ 

Allr.aline dlge8Uon (for solids) 

Organic Teehaiquea 

Separstory funnel liquid-liquid axtractioo 

Cont.muoua liquicf.liquid eslnelioll 

Acld·baoe clean-up eztractlon 

Saxblet extraclian 

SooicatJon estraction 

METKOD REFERENCE 

1-8010 

8-84.()7; 1-8020 

8-91-61; S.E686; E926; 6-Bulletm 4745 

1·9030 

Alumlna Column C!Mn-up and Separation of Pel.roloum Wastes 

l'lunlliJ ColumD CIM&up 

8-8(·22; 1-3610 

1-3520 

1-S5SQ 

-8~ 

1-3650 

1-8611 

8-8(-22; 1-8620 

1-:1600 

8·84·22; 1-8660 

Silica Gel Clean·up 

Sulfur Clean·up 

lnorpnie Anabtloal Methods: 

lnductlvelf Olupled Pluma Atomi<: Emlaeion 

Spectroeoopy (ICP) ' 

Antimony 

Atomic abeorption, direct aapi:alion method 

Atoaie abeorptlon, I'Umilee method 

Anenic 

Atomic abeorpUoo, furoaoe method 

Alamic abeaptlon, .-.. h,ydride melbod 

WAP·A-4 

1-8010 

1·7040; 4-204.1 

1·7041; 4·204.2 

8-84· 10; 1·7060; 4-206.2 

1·7061; 4-206.8 

REVISION 11 

9/29/94 

VESOI1212 
Barium 

Atomic abaorptloa, direct aapilatlon metbocl 

Atomic abeorption, funw:e method 

BerylliWD 

Atomic alleOrptlon, dire<:~ ... piratlon method 

Atomic abeorptioa, furnace method 

Cadm!WD 

Atomic alleorption, direct. asph-atlon method 

Alcmle abeorption, fllnl*:e method 

Cakiwn 

Atomle abeorption, direct aspiration melbo<i 

Alcmic abaorption, furnace ~ 

CbromiWD 

Copper 

Alcmlc aho<lrption, direct upltation method 

Atomic: absorption, furnace method 

Hexavalent ehromium: Co-prec:ipit.alloo 

Huavalent chromium: Colorimetric 

Huavalent cbromlum: Chelation~ 

Atomic abeorptlon, direct aaplrat.icm method 

Atomic~ funw:e method 

Alcmle aboorpl.ion, clirec:t eapiratlon method 

Atomic abeorption, Curn.oce method 

PhenanthroUne melbod (fenoua) 

Alcmic abtlorption, direct lllpiration melbod 

Atomk "'-rpt..oD. fllnl*:e method 

Maaneaium 

Atomic abeorption, direct aspiration method 

Manpnete 

Alcmic abaorpllon, direct aspiration Oll!tbod 

Atomt: ~ turr.ce method 

Mercury (mMual oold--nopor teebnique) 

InUQllidwaote 

In IOI:d or oemi·oolid WMte 

Nlcltel 

Alcmic ~ direct aspilalioo mdbod 

Atomic abeorption, tumece method 

Selenium 

Atomic abeorptinn, f'unlace method 

Atomic aboorptlon, gueeua hydride 11101bod 

Atomic absorption, direct aspiration melbod 

Al=lc abooorptioQ, fumace metbod 

WAP-A-5 

METHOD REFERENCE 

1-7080; 4·208.1 

1-7081; 4·208.2 

1-7090; 4-210.1 

1-7091; 4-210.2 

1-7150; 4·218.1 

1-7131; 4·213.2 

1·7140; 4·21S.1 

4-216.2 

1-7190; 4·218.1 

1-7191; 4·218.2 

1·7195 

1·7198;2~D 

1·7197; (.218.-j, 

1-7210; .... ~.1 

(.220.2 

1-7880; 4·236.1 

H36.2 

2-SilOOFeD 

1-7420; 4·289.1 

1-7.j,21; 4-239.2 

1-7460; 4·W.1 

1-7460; (.243.1 

4·243.2 

8-84-12; 1-7470 

B-84·05; N&-12; 1·7471 

1·7a20; 4·249.1 

1-7521; 4·249.2 

&-8(.13; 1·7140; 4·271).2 

1·7741; 4·270.8 

1·7760; 4-272.1 

1-7761; 4·272.2 

REVlSION It 

9129/94 

I 

I 

• 1 .. 

' 

! 

i 

I 

i· 

. 

VES0ll213 
.. .. " . . .. , . .. ' ..... 

PARAMETER )JEmOD REFERENCE 

Tballium 

Atomil abeorption, direct upiralklo method 1·7840; (·279.1 

Atomic absorption, furnace method 1·7841; 4·279.2 

Atomic abaorptloo, direct a.ophatlon method 

Atomic abeorplion, furnace mdbod 

Orpnlc Analytlcal MeU>.oda: 

Gaa Chromalo£raphic Methods 

~ted Volatile Orpnio:.s 

Noo-halogenated Volatile Orpnics 

Aroawlc Volal.ile Orpnlao 

Acrolein, hrylonitrile, Acetonitrile 

Phenola 

Phthakte Eaten 

Orpnochlarine PeoUcidea aDd PCBa 

Nltroornmatlal and c,.dle Kston.. 

Polyn•cleor Aromat.lc Hydrocarbooa 

Cblorinated lf.ydroc:arbone 

Orpnophoophate Peeticlclee 

CbloriDated Herbiciclee 

GC&uut 

Gaa Chromatovaphi<:/Maaa Spectroe<>lPY Methods 

GC1MS Method for Dioxin 

GCiM8 Method for V olatlle <>rpmc. 

GCI1l8 Metbad for Sead-Volat.ile Orpnlca 

Infrared Spe<trOIOOJlY Methods 

Screening Mel.hoda: 

Pbyalcel Delcriptloo 

F'll!mmeNli~y Potemw ScreeSl 

Wat.er Compatibility 

pH Screen 

Sul6de Screen 

Cyanldoo S<reen 

()('mmineled Waate CompaUbllity 

Pol:1meriWion Poi=lial 

Oxldiaer Screen 

Paint Filter Teat 

Bulk Demlq.. and Apparent Sped& GriiVity Screen 

WAP·A~ 

1·7950; 4·289.1 

4·289.2 

1·8010 

1·8016 

l-8020 

1·8090 

1-8040 

1·8060 

8-84-22; 1·8080 

1·8090 

1·8100 

1-11120 

1-BUO 

1·8160 

8-8&02; S·E260 

1-11280,8290 

1-8240; 7-624 

1·82SO; 8270; 7-626 

8·D2621, Dt063; G· 

8·D4979 

S.D4982 

S.D6068C 

3·D4980 

8-D4978 

S.D5049 

8-D6068A 

S.D6058B 

S·D4981 

1·9095 

3-06067 

REVISION 11 

9129104 

VES0112 14 
PARAMETER 

MlscellaneOWI Analytical Methods: 

Acidity 

Alkalinity 

Ammuula 

Anions by Jon Chromatography 

Ash Content 

Bt<mides 

Cblorldet 

Cooduclivitytcccduotance 

Extraction Procedure 

Flasb point 

Penaky-Martena dOled-cup method 

Seta.flasb dosed-cup method 

Cleveland open-cup 

Fluoride 

Free Cyenldes 

Halopn Contmt 

Heat Value 

Oil and Grease 

Oxidation-Red"JCtion (ll.edox) Potential (ORP) 

Petroleum Hydrooarbons, Total R.!ccwerable 

Pbenob 

pH Measurement 

Pbolpbate• 

Radioactivity Scffi!n 

Solids 

Total ('1'8) at 103-l060C ~ed (TDS) at 1eo•c 

SUJpended, Total ('I'SS) at 103-105"C 

Fixed and Volatile at 6000C 

Spedflc Gra•'ity 

Sulfatea 

Sulfur 

Total and Amenable Cyaoidea 

Total ChloriDe Content 

Total Orpnie Carbon 

Total SuJfide! 

Toxicity Cbaracteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLPJ 

VIICOiity 

Water Content 

WAP-A-1 

m:THOD REFERENCE 

8·91·68; 2·2310 

2·2320 

4-360.3 

&-87-40; 3-04327; 4·000.0 

8-91·69; 8-0482, 03174 

2-4500Bt'; 4-800.0, 320.1 

I!-4600Cr: 4-ooo.o, su.a 

3-01126; 4-1.20.1 

1-1310 

8-S..l9; 1-1010; 8-093 

1-1020;8-~8 

3-092 

:V4llOOF'; 4-300.0, 340.2, 340.3 

2-4600CN-a,J 

3-0808, 01!361, 04327 

8-87-37; 3·0240, 02016 

2·5620; ~13.1, 418..2 

3·01498 

2-<6620F; .f.-418.1 

2·5580, 6420; 4-420.1 

Hl040, 9041, 9046: 2-4600H•; 3·E70; .f.-160.1 

H500P; 4·300.0, 365.1-4 

8-87·36 

2-2540B; 4-180.3 

2-2640C; 4-160.1 

2-254.00; 4-160.2 

2-2540E, 25400: .f.-160.4 

:V2710F; 8-070, De91, 01217, 01429 

2-460080, •-: 4-800.0, 876.3 

8-8HO; 8-0129, 03177, lM327 

1·9010A; 2-4~00CN'C,G; 4-SSII.l 

8·0608, 04327 

2..t5310; 8·~79 

1-9080; 2-450082

' 

1-1311 

8-86-85; 8·088. 0446, 02983 

8-D9S. 03173, E203 

REVISION 11 

9/29/94 

., ·, 

'· ;: 

t 

i' 

' 

! 

J 

.. 

VES0ll2l5 
Tho ~e:eoced procedu:l'es are described in t.he followine publications. The first digit of the refere~><e nwnbeH ahoYe ore keyed to the numbers ahown below: 

1· 'TeatMethoda for EvaluatinaSolid Wute, Physica11Cbemical Methodl", SW·i146, Tblrd Edltica, 1986 

u omended by Update I (,July 1992), U.S. Enviroomental Proteclion Apw;y, Off'.ee ol Solid Wute 

(}ri'IB, 6286 Porl Royal Road, Spring!leld, VA 22161) or more recent edition or revlaion (GPO, Supt. 

of Documents, Washinflton, DC 20402). 

2· "81aJ:JoWd Metbocb ror the RxamiN<tlon ni'Wo.ter and Wutewater', 18th Editlon, American Public 

Health Alooclatlon (1016 Fifteenth Slleet, NW, WuJUnctan, DC 20006), American Water WoriDI 

Allocialion, Water Environment Federation, 1992, or more recent edition or update. 

3· 'AMual Book oC ASTM Standards', American Society for Testmr and Mat!rials (1916 Race Street, 

Philadelphia, PA 19013·1187), 1992, or more recent edition or reviaion. 

4· 'Metboda for Chemical Analy8ia oC Water and Wasres', EPA-eo<l/4-7!)-020, U.S. Environmental 

Prote<:l!oJl A,erv:y, Environmental Monitoring and Supporl Laboratory (Cincinnat~ OH 415268), aa 

revised March 1983, or more recent reviaioo or tecbnicaJ edition. 

5- Infrared Ana.lylio Method in IERirRTP Procedur .. Manual: Level 1 Eoviroomental Aaomment 

(2nd E<litioo), EPA-!100/'7·78-201, October, 1978, or more recent edition. 

Add~ Bombs", Blllletin4746,Parr Inatrument Compeqy (){olioe, n. 61266), or more recent 

bulletiD. 

7· 'MethA:da for Organic CheuW:al Analyoia oC Munidpol and lndn.tttial W..tewater, Appendix A oC 

Title '0 Code ol Federal Regulal.lons Part 186, U. 8. Environm<ntal Protection Aflerv:y, 

En.nronmental Monitcringand Support IAboramry.Oncinnati, u omendec!June 1986 or mare recent 

revision. 

8· "CWM Analytical et.h~ Manual', Chemical Waste Manae=ent, be., ADa(ytiml Prqvama, 

September 1992. 

Standard anaJytlcal procedurea listed bere wbloh are revised can be lmplemented upon the effective date ol 

tbe rmson, with notifkalion to the IEPA·DLPC PenDit 8ectloa. 

WAP·A·B REVISION 11 

912919' 

.... 

i 

i. 

: .. 

VESOI12 l6 
' I 

; 

APPENDIX WAP·B 

ASH AND DRY SCRUBBER SOLIDS 

SAMPLING PROTOCOL 

!. 

:~ 

i 

\. 

~~ 

VESOL12l7 
., 

. ' 

APPENDIX WAP·B 

ASH AND DRY SCRUBBER SOLIDS 

SAMPLING PROTOCOL 

1.0 PURPOSE 

'!'be TWl Iocilleral<n destroy harardous waates in high lempenlture thermal ~clatioo Jl!'OCU'OO& This 

Pf'ocMure provideo assurance that a represenlatlve sample of ash or dry scrubber aolids (DSS) is collected Cor 

anaJ.yai.s. 

2.0 SAMPLING 

2.1 Sample ldentlfte&tlon 

2.1.1 Each ~Je eontainer is labeled with date, lime of day, !lllmpler, and container idcntif1C8tloo number. 

'!'be &&~~~plea....., logged into the laboratory Production Cbain-of.CUStody I~ upoo deliYel'J' to tbe 

laboraloly. 

2.j Sample Collection 

2.2.1 Allh and DSS eampie!l are collected, ~ed aod n1!1uatod on a (j\liii1VJ;y baaia to enaure the 

reolduab met the LOR t.reo.tmeni stand&rds. 

2.2.2 Sam.pletl are collected u outlined in Section 2.2.1 of the W AP. An auger it typical~;, U8lld to olllain 

a repret1011tative !lllmple of the ash or DSS. Eoch oample jar muat be filled with ub or DSS. 

2.2.8 Trained operationa peraonnel will colle<lt tbe sample aod .ubaequentJ.y eclmowledge cuetody by 

completing appli:able reetion.s of the laborato.y Productlon Cbain-of-custod,y logbook. Sample 

preperati.on aod 111181Yeil wW be perfo1111ed u 110011 u practicable foUowiJw' whieh the dilpoeiQon of 

the eah (Sectioo 4.0) will be determined. 

2 . s Samplinlf Penonnel 

2.3.1 lt ia the reapoosibillty of Facility Management to llllicn 011\y qualilled penonnelto perform the ub 

or DSS sa.mpling. Penoonel that ba.,. been trained In the implellleDialion of tble procedure are 

considered to be qualified. 

3.0 8AMPlJ!l ANALYSIS 

S.1 Each wnple will be oent to a CWM or CWM approved lab for IIJUIIylis of LDR coostiluenl4 by the 

appro~ method. 

3.2 The t:ncldng of waste eoclee lhroiJ8b the Incineration proceea to the incinerator ""'iduala will be done 

in with TWI Standard Divialoo Practice 1661. 

WAP·Jl.l REVISION 11 

9!29/94 

i 

I 

I 

; 

i·' 

VESOll2l8 
- . : ' 

.............. 

'-0 DISPOSmON OF ASH AND DRY SCRUBBER SOLIDS (DSS) 

i.J. Any·~~ or !Ill .or 0118 1\1!\t WM SI\Dl,PI~ for~~~ ill ~ tQ t.M.~wr~ ~tmem .. 

standard or prolu'bitlon, will be retained by the facility until reoulta are avalable for ovaluatlon. 

"-2 The ~ resu1t.s are evaluated agaiDit the LDR treAtment at.andarde for tile codea in the container. 

The container Ia releaaed if all treatment standarda are met. 

.. s Tbo IUUllyoi• reaults are evaluated agaiost lhe LDR treatment standards for all oodee acc:ep~ by 

TWl. M..,tinr the _ _ t siandarda ia demonstrated throtllh the procteL 

"-4 When CO!Dplionce with the LDR atandarda has been demonstrated, the material will be llahllUod and 

subaequently disposed or at CWM approved haz.ardowl waste ~ment facilities. The manifeet and 

Land Dilpoaal Re.strietim Tl-eatmant Cutilication will be c:ompleted prior to abipmeai.. 

BEVIBION 11 

9~ 

:. 

L 

1: 

l' 

I 

I 

' 

. I 

·,_,. 

VES01121S 
·. 

' 

.. 

·1 

APPENDIX WAP·C 

WASTE ACCEPTABn.ITY CRJTEJUA 

r 

i 

VES011220 
' . ... .. , -. . 

APPENDIX WAP·C 

WASTE ACCEPTABILITY CRITERIA 

The following ~imls apply to tbe acceptance oC W8!ia uhihitiDg errtain prcpertiea or apeciJlc waatee 

at TW1 Pm to acceptance (lee Section 6.2), the Mandatory Analyaea and the WMte ProOie Sheet wW be 

evaluated against this appendix. Any reotrictiona identified wlD be documented on the wute management 

deciaioo. The lilt oC ilema Wider eedl of th_, heedis:lp is not .....,,to be exhaustive. The prolillng process 

will include a review of the MSDSo and a search of the other bibliographic reiiOUI'Cel (eee Appendix WAP·FJ 

for e;ytlOI\)'1Il8, product llAIIle&, common namea. The nature of the restrictiona are at follawo: 

REJECT • The!e Mater!a!t may not be Proceued at the facility. 

Rt"ffltiye Waatea 

Radioactive materials aa def=d by tbe TWI Part B RCRA Permit, or ereater tJJan 0.6 mlllirada per bour 

(per Seotlon SJ.4) 

Permit I&nited W"'" 

F020 

F021 

F022 

F023 

F027 

F028 

PCBa > 60 ppm (or other TSCA regulaLed PCBs) 

WAP-c-1 REVISION 11 

9129/94 

! . 

l 

I 

I 

I 

H 

VES011221 
ReguJptory Soedl!ed Treatment Teebno)ogy o!her than Incineration 

DOOB"N"tCd Batteries ---

D008 Lead acid Batteries 

K009 Non-Calcium Sulfate 

Qther Una&!!e!l!able Waot.es 

SPECIAL PACKAGING · Wastes exhibit~ the properties listed below (water/u 

r-eacllve, malochrou2, rapid heat ~-) durine the prolllini: prooe!l8 may he aecepted If they are ohipped 

in epeclal Jl8cltt81ng, ro~ on site or if the material conforms to opoe!llcatiOM allowing proeaaing In 

eximng TWI facilit.lea. 

WatfJr!Air Reaetlve Wutes 

P.mhloratea 

Thionyl ehloride 

Phoopborouo 

Metal hydridt8 

Silanes 

Chlorolormalea 

Oleum 

Other water or air reactive wastes 

WAP-C-2 REVISION 11 

11/29194 

I' . 

I 

.j 

I 

' I 

I 

' !· 

i 

' 

i 

r 

VESOI1222 
Ma!odorouo Compounds 

Meroaptane 

Sulfides 

ww which exhibits enmretle eh&racterillie! 

Waate which exhibits one.,..tlc characteristlcl (c.,., prcpellanta, ""!'k>eivee. pyr<>i.c<hni<o, n • ....,.ble liqttio:k. 

etc.} will eic.ber be atcepted per the Small Quantity Cbemical ,wdelinea cw will be e:copted per the followin& 

procedure. 

Wben the volwx:e cl a -IU'etUD or cbaDsea in iD<ineraror peft0<1D&IICe indlcateo that a larger charge size 

Ia warr&Dted, 'IWI will fonow the following pr;l<ledure: 

1) The material will be r<Mewed using mereuce informat.loD, MSDSe where 

availabl&, generator dlacusoiona or pr<Mouo experience. Baaed on tbia 

review, TWI will cletermille if a 1areet clwge lift ie acceptable. 

2) When It bas been determined that a ~Areer charie llhe Ia lltlOepteble, 

TWI wW either: 

a) Determine if Lhla type of material bas been prevlooaiY proceeeed &1 TWI in larger charlfl oisea 

and Lhereby eateblillh a ·~ me; or 

b) Conduct a test burn of the material to determine what charge lise would be acceptable. Tbia 

teat bum will atsrt with the quantity apeoified in the SQOG'o clthe eneflldk ~nt aDd 

be iD<reued by DO Dlllre than double the preYWWI charie from tbia darting point balled on the 

lnclnerator operation&. The incineo-ator operation& parameten ..-bleb will be ewlueled to 

detenolne if cbarge .tze am be lncreaaed will be aa 

folio we: 

> Vacuum d........., in the primary or secondary chamber. 

> Temperatlll'e i.ru:reeae in the primary chamber cl > lOO"F 

> Vlaual interruption cl the primary flame 

> Noo·atead,y state pa Dow. 

NOTE: Tbia teet prowca!IIUQ' be utiliud to eatablish revi8ed charge lizes for 1111 matoria.la pteriouiJy limited 

in the SQOG;a. Teat burn documeolatioo will be prooided to the IEPA·DLPC prillr to implementins 

Jar'"' <barge .uea. 

WAP.C.S REVlSION 11 

9/2.9/94 

t 

• I 

1 

I 

l 

l I 

l 

! 

I 

l 

[ 

I 

! 

I 

I' 

i 

i 

,. 

! 

! 

VES011223 
·. " 

DIO:pNTESTJNG • Wutes which COD laiD~ thaD O.Ol .. of thMecon.Utuenta require dioxin 

. analysis at. a l.ppm .thNtlhold berore.acceptanee. ... -·-··· -- .. 

Etbon (2{2,4,6-tricllloropben.O'IJ)·ethyl 2,2-<lichlorcpropenote)) 

Heucllloropbem (2,2-metbylene-bis IM,EHrlchlorophenolD 

2,4,6·trichlorophenol 

2,4,6-trichloropbonol 

2,4,6-T 

2,4,6-TP 

(2,(,6-t.richlorophenoJIY """tlc acid) 

(2·(2,4,6-triclllotophenoJ~Y) propenoic acid, SUvu) 

2,8,4,6-tetracb!Cll'Ophenol 

Pentacbloropheool (PCP) 

Ronnel (0,0-di.nctbyl 0·(2,4,6·tricbloropheo,yl)phoephorothloare) 

Debris from fire invoMnc PCBa or the compcunds lieted above 

Some or lbeae W118\es (Silva, 2,ol,6·T, ond PCP) are detected by the ocrea>ing tala wbiob will be employad 

oo c1io1in euepeet wute etreema per the TWI Dioxin Suopect Wute Policy. Additio!lal waotee lilted~· it 

indicated by tbe «enerator on the pror.J.e inrormaUon, wiD be tested uaing 11111 cbromato8faPh ~ 

Tbe fOlio~ are brend name product4 whiob indude the compo1mda 1ist.ed above (thia H.t ia not loteoded to 

be all incluaive): 

AMCBEM 

AMINE 2,4,6-T 

AQUA· VEX 

B&USH·BHAP 

BRUSHTOX 

DACINE 

DE!). WEED 

DOUBLE STRENG'm 

DOWCIDE3 

DOWCIDE6 

DOWCIDE2S 

DOWCIDE EC-7 

DOWCIDE G-ST 

ENVERTDT 

ENVERTT 

EMUI.SAMINE BK 

ESTERONE 

FARMCO FENCE RIDER 

FENOPBOP 

FOBBON 

FRUlTONET 

INVE1n'ON 245 

KURON 

KUROSAL 

UNBRIDBR 

PENCHLOR 

PENTACON 

PENWAR 

PBILTOX 

REDDON 

SANTOBBITE 

SM'TOPHBN 

SILVI·BAP 

SINmJHO 

WAP-c.4 

SFONTOX 

SUPER D WEEDONE 

T·NOX 

TORMANA 

TRANSAMINE 

TRIBUTON 

TRINOXOL 

U 46 

VEON2t6 

VEB'l'ON 2T 

VISKO RRAP LOW 

VOLATILE ESTER 

WEEDAB 

WEED·B·GONE 

WEI!DBBADS 

WEEDONE 

BEVISION 11 

9129/94 

F 

! 

I' 

! 

VES011224 
. .. ,_, . ..... .. ; .... .......... 

r: 

- -.fAPPENDIX WAP·D 

DETERMINATION OF INCOMING WASTE 

CONFORMAN~ONCONFORMANCE 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I. 

VES011225 
APPENDIX WAP·D 

---~~~~C!W~TE CQI'fl>O~CJ!;IN.9~·QQ.NF9..RMANJ;:E ___ _ 

ln<lomine waste may vary from the informatioo determined during the profiling plwe due to the variability in 

the proceea ~neratlni the - or in collectloo of the wute moteriaL In or<ler lo determlDe whether a 

perticular incomlng waste stream conforms to the profile, the following criteria WI be uaed. All other 

Mondato.-y and SllJlplemental analyeia dAta collected will be ueed to allow TWI to delenuine the beat method 

for proceain8 the ,..... material 

1. pH Sc:reen: A variation in the pH 11om the l'8ll£" apecifled in the pro11Je ~nt.o may indlcste 

a change in the waste atreem. If a pH variation beyond the range apedied on the liquid prollle 

sheet, the procedures ouUiited in Section 6.2-4 will be Initiated <•·lr·• a waate wbiclt is oormally 

neutral ia found to be eorrooive). Moterlala will be evaluated for conformance u toUows: 

ProiJ!i"R' Ana!yti.ca!Re6ult Ag;eptable Bange 

<2 <2 

2-12.6 2·12.5 

> 12.6 > 12-b 

Wuteo pr<>tiled u pH 2 to pH 12.5 but abipped with an aocompeeying LDR form for 0002 will be 

considered oonforming at pH < 2 or pH > 12.6 if aorpported by the prallJ..t ehemi<:el eonstitlw!ta. 

2. &mprN!!tv Po!entlal Screen; A variAtion in the thermal activity from tbe lndioators specifted in 

the p!Ofile clocwoents will indicate a cbanp in the Wllllle otream. If the variation c:auoea a ebanp 

ill lhc bu4rd claM o( tbe wtUOte. the procedures outlined in Section 6.U will be Initiated (e.g. a 

material which did not ~it Oamm•hilily potential in the profillnf plwe doea during the incoming 

shipment procedures). 

S. ~ The unexpected preaence of PCBo > 60 ppm contrary to that apecified in the ptoliJe 

clocummt.o will Indicate a thaace in the waste otream, which would initiate the procedurea outJiDad 

in Se:Qon 6.2.4. TWI i1 not permitted to aooept PCBo > 60 ppm or TSCA derivl!d PCB wutea. 

4, R•djpj!yjly Scr!m; The pretl!noe of radioactive lll&teriala aa dotermined by the radloadMty screen 

(lee Section au) will inlt.late the procedures u outlined in Section 6.2.4, leading to rejeclioo of the 

material 

WAP-!H REVISION U 

9129/94 

l 

I 

I 

I 

I 

i· 

i 

i 

VESOl1226 
5. Apparent Vilcooity: A eignif\cant Vlll'iation in the apparent vlleooity from tNt specified in the pr<>iile 

, - ·· ~~ wfll jn~e !_C~ tn ~!_Ute &tretu!t_lbat.would ~t.e ~ ~edurc!_OU ~ IJ! 

Section 5.2.4. 

WAP·D·2 REVISION 11 

9/29/94 

I 

I 

' 

VES01122'i 
. ' ... . . ...... . 

~. : '• 

. ~ 

I . 

APPENDIX WAP·E 

CONTAINEIUZED WAS'l'Et SPECIAL SAMPLING PROCBDURES . I 

·., ; 

VES011228 
APPENDIX WAP·E 

~J:IT~ W~TE; fH'ECIAL SMt~PI,.!NG PROCEQUJlES 

LO PURPOSE 

Tbls pro:edure providn asaursnce that repouentative samples oCtile followine coolalneriled wams 

ore ool.loc:tod fnr analysj& SpecillcaQy, these are containerised wuteo oC debrio &Dd lilte material, 

odhelliws and other ~ elaatic aubal.aDceo, and re.lna and other hard lllllterials. Repreaent.atlve 

aamplee are eollected by uaing multipoint aampline. 

2.0 OEPINITIONS 

2.1 Debrio and like mat.erial - includes wood, bricks, CClllCI"ete, vegetation, plutic aheetillg, 

protective elothina:, etc. 

2.2 Adhesives and odJer higbJy elastic materiall- sticky, gl-like, gummy, llzelcl>able material~. 

2.3 Reeine and other bard materiala • plaatb &Dd plutlc compooeots, opozieto and other phyllcally 

similar mat.eriala that have hardened or cured. 

2.4 Multipoint 811Dlple • A aemple eompoaed oC rubsamplea aolleeted from the oeme eoftlainer that 

is represmlatlve the CCDteslta of the cootalner. 

S .. O lNSPECI'fON 

Eeeh eonta!Mr will be evaluated prior to openinlto detA!nnine it '• intogrity. Al\er openina, the 

container's CIXIIOlll.t will be 'lisually lnopect.ed to determiDe whether or not it eonforma with ita 

profiled dncripl.lan. 

U PERCENT SAMPLED 

See Waste ADaJy.il Plan Sectioo 6-L 

6-0 SAMPLING 

Multipoint IISJDplee ~ oo inepeetioo will be eoUec:ted fruD contai:lers oelecUd for aampllog. 

Samplioc equiJ"DD'll will be oeloeud ~ Oil reru1t:a or the iDopectioL Semple• will be in CWM 

custody from eample eollectloo Wltil traMI'er or ....tod,y to the anal,ticel laboratory. Sampling 

equipment will be decontaminated prior to and af\er wnpllne Hdl - atreem. 

WAP·E-1 REVISION 11 

9/29194 

'.l.. 

VES01122~ 
.. 

' 

6.1 IUGHLY ELASI'IC SUBSTANCES 

.. - ~~ !'ll!!. l!!Mr. )\igh)J(_ele.m: •~ '!'ill\!olJNIIllpJed.Yrilh a.acoop .«liloxel and 

ocisaoro or t.oop. The procedure is 14: 

&1.1 dip the shovel or oeoop into the JDatmel to the d&ptb of the blade and rotAte; 

6.1.2 lift the ..._ or above! with the aample and cut wilb t.he tci.non o.- touaw, u 

appropriate; 

6.1..3 wind the bangina portion of tbe aample onto the oooop or shovel and transfer lbe 

aomple to the aample eontainer by !ICI'&J)ine t.be ID&Ierial &om the shovel or scoop into 

the sample container. 

6.2 DEBRIS AND LIKE MATERIAL 

Debris and like materials will be umpled with acilaoro, bounmM, chile! md tollp aa 

appropriale. The procedure il to: 

U.l use hammer and chisel to collec:t aampleo of wood, brick or other bard msterial from the 

top of the container and place In the lllllple container will! ~ 

5.2.2 use .,....,... to cut temple of tyvelt and ctber eeall1 Mable materialo (peddlng, rubber, 

plastic aheet.lng, e~.) and place In aample container with tcDp. 

5.8 R&SINS AND/OR OTHER HARD MATERIALS 

Resina and/UI' other bard material& will be """'Pled with a hammer, cbiael and ump or acocp. 

The procedure il to: 

6.8.1 Uae hammer and chilel to N<iuee roMerial(o) eise 10 that it ,_ euily be placed in a 

tllllllple c:ootainer and place the oample in the con+einer wll.h tooaa o.- ecoop. 

6.0 SAMPLING PERSONNEL 

7.0 

It ia the-~ oC h:llity Management to auign only qualified per10111141 to perform 

opeclalized lllllllpilngofcoataineriud waste. PeriiOOIIel that have been trained in the lmplementetinn 

of thl.o procedure are COilOiidered to be qualified. 

SAMPLE ANALYSIS 

Slllllpi9 will be ~ed e.a epecifled in &ctiona 3.1, 8.2, md 3.8, and Ficufo 8·1 of the WAP. 

Adtiitlcoal analy8il will be performed at the requeo\ of the Facility !laDagement. 

WAP-1!}2 REVlBION 11 

9fl9l94 

. .. 

I 

I 

I 

! 

' . 

; \ 

'· 

VES011230 
.. · 

APPENDIX WAP-P 

BIBUOGRAPHY OF STANDARD CBEMJCAL REFERENCE MA'I'EBlAL8 

VES01123 1 
····· 

1. 

s. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

10 . 

.. . :

APPENDIX WAP·F 

_.!J~O~~ OF ~~ARD fHEMICAL ~~NCE MA~ .. 

The Merclr. Index, Current Edition, 1983 Merclt & Co. Inc., Rahway, NJ. 

Dangerous Properties of Industrial Chemicale, Current Edition 1989, Van Noet:and Reinhold, NY 

NY. 

ColldeD&ed Cbcmnl DieUonary, Current Edition, 1987 Van Noatrand Reinhold,NY NY. 

CWld AS...a<l computeriled MSDS eyltem, current venion. 

Farm Chemicals '91, Meister Publishlng Co. 

Chemical Synon)'IDI & Trade Nomee, Current Editioo, 1987 Qo_,- Tec:!mical Pre.. 

Handbook cl Reactive Cbemicek, CurTent Editioo, 1985 L. Bretllerick. 

Handbook of Cbemiotry & P!lyaicl, Current EdWon, 1976 CBC Preoa. 

WAP·F-1 REVlSION U 

9129194 

VES011232 
I 

[ 

I ·., 

APl>ENDIX WAP-G 

Hl\H81 COMPATIBILITY CLASSES 

I. 

VES011233 
< . . . 

; 

DQ'l'CJMO 

1.1 - 1.6 

2 .1- 2.2 

8 

4.1 

4.2 

4.8 

5.1 

5.2 

2.3 

6.1 

8 

9 

APPENDIX WAP - G 

HM·I81 COMPATIBlL'llY CLASSES 

~ 

E•plosi•es 

AerOISOI Cans 

F\flllUrulble Liquid 

Flammable Solids 

Spootaneously Combustibles 

Dangerous When Wet 

Oxidizers 

Orpnic Peroxides 

PoiiiODOWI Gas Zone A & B 

Poioon0011 Liquid Zone A 

Corrosiv .. 

Mi.....UIIDMOJS N.O.S. Debris 

Non-Hatnrdous Material 

WAl'·G·l IIEVISION 11 

9/29/94 

, ' .. 

.. 

··. 

VES011234 
CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT 

PCB SCREENING POUCY 

......• ,. 

Revision 1 

October 1991 

0 ·· ...... ··· ·u i 

VES01123~ 

I 

i '. l. 

I. 

f 
.... ~ .. . 

CWM PCB SCREENING POUCY 

L INTRODUCT1oli 

The TolCic Subs1ances Control Act {TSCA} Is the primary source of federal 

regulalloos affecting the management of Polychlorinated Biph~nyis (PCBs). Most 

of the provisions of the TSCA regulations specified in 40 CFR Part 761 apply to 

PCBs only if PCBs are present in concentratiol'ls above specf'ied levels. The 40 

CFR Part 761 subpart D Storage and Disposal provisions apply generally to 

material at concentrations of 50 parts per milllon (ppm) and above. However, no 

provision specifying a PCB concentration may be avoided by diluting PCB 

containing materials unless othflfWise specifically provided. · 

Furthermore, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) is an 

add~ional source of federal regulations affecting the management of hazardous 

waste containing PCBs. The land disposal of l quid hazardous wastes cootaining 

PCBS at concentrations greater than or equal to 50 p~ is prohibited under the 

-~ provisions of 40 CFR Part 268.32 (a)(2). The land disposal of liquid or nonUquld hazardous waste containing halogenated organic compounds (HOCs) 

includng PCBs (see 40 CFR Part 268 Appendix Ill for a listing of HOCs) at 

concentrations equal to or greater than 1000 mg/l. or 1000 mg/kg, respectlvely, 

Is prohibited under the provisions of 40 CFR Part 268.32 (a)(3), (e)(1), and (e)(2) 

the "California Ust. • In addition, the management of liquld hazardous waste 

contanng PCBs at concentrations of 50 ppm or above as wei as liquid or nonliquid hazardous wastes containing HOCs including PCB& (see 40 CFR Part 268 

Appendix Ill for ist of HOCs) in total concentrations equal to or greater than 

1000 mg/L or 1000 mg,1(g for liquld or solid, respectively, are specified under the 

provisions of 40 CFR Part 268.42. Finally, the land disposal of hazardous waste 

containing PCBs and Identified by the ~sted hazardous waste code numbers 

K08S and F039 (multi-source leachate) is regulated under Specific Land Disposal 

Restrictions (LOR) provisions under 40 CFR Part 268.43. These regulations 

req~Ne PCBs to be treated to the following levels {Table I) prior to land disposal. 

2 

Revision 1 

October 1991 

' I 

i 

.j 

i. 

! ~ ;· 

l 

i 

VES011236 
PCB Screening Policy 

K085 & F039 

Aroctor 1016 

Aroclor 1221 

Arodor 1232 

Aroclor 1242 

Aroclor 1248 

Arodor 1254 

Arodor 1260 

TABLE I 

Waste Water 

mg/l. 

0.013 

0.014 

0.013 

0.017 

0.013 

0.014 

0.014 

Non-Waste Water 

mglkg 

0.92 

0.92 

0.92 

0.92 

0.92 

1.8 

1.8 

State and local agencies and permits may also regulate the management of 

PCBs. Compliance with these regulations is required wherever they are more 

stringent than federal regulation-s (e.g., certain states require that the PCBs be 

reported on a dry weight basis). 

Additionally, TSCA addresses PCBs, not Aroclora. This includes incidentally 

produced PCBs and foreign produced materials that include Clopheno, 

Phenoclor•. Pyralenee, Kanechlor•, and Feodor• 

In order to assure that the appropriate practices are being applied consistently 

throughout Chemical Waste Management, Inc. (CWM) regarding the management 

of wastes which may potentially contain PCBs, It is important to define 

procedures to be employed throughout the company. Therefore, the following 

Policy and Procedures has been developed. 

3 

Revision 1 

October 1991 

I 

i 

I 

! 

\ 

j 

VESOll237 

1-.. 

' ' 
PCB Screening Policy 

A. The treatment, storage, and disposal of any TSCA regulated waste shan 

occur only at a TSCA approved treatment, storage, or disposal facility. 

B. All PCB analyses requited as a result of the application of this policy shall 

be performed by a CWM laboratory or a CWM approved waste laboratory. 

C. Any waste ltlat will be analyzed for PCBs in accordance with this policy 

shaU not be eccepted for storage, treatment. or disposal until PCB 

analyses have been completed and evaluated. 

o. Any non-TSCA waste which meets the folowing crit9ria shan be treated as 

a PCB suspect waste until demonstrated otherwise, through chemical 

analysis. 

Ill. PCB SUSPECT WASTE CRfTERIA 

The following criteria have been developed by Chemical Waste Management, Inc. 

through its extensive operating experienCes as wen as through review of various 

sources of literature for defining a waste as being PCB Suspect. These criteria 

are intended to supplement existing requirements which may have been imposed 

through permit conditions, administrative orders, or other agreements with federal 

or state regulatory agencies. 

A. Generator-Defined PCB Waste 

Any wasti for which the generator has Indicated on the "Generator's Waste 

Material Profile Sheet" or any other supporting documentation that PCBs 

are present below regulated levels. 

4 

Revision 1 

October 1991 

VESOJ 1238 
PCB Screening Policy 

B. l?i~ S.ea~ Waste 

NOTE: , Dil bearing wastes are defined as any material (liquid, solid, 

organic, or aqueous) containing oil as described on the 'Generator's Waste 

Material Profile Sheet" (other supportrng documentation) OR any material 

which exhibits the visual presence of 011. 1he visual pre::ence of oil may 

include, but is not llm~ed to, an Oil emulsion, oil film, oll phase, or water 

soluble 011. It is the responsibility of the Laboratory Managef at each 

d'rvision to use sound judgment based on their analytical experience to 

make the final determination If a waste stream exhibits the visual presence 

of oil. 

C. Municipal Waste Water Treatment Facility Sludge 

D. Bulk Laboratory Wastes 

E. Baghouse Dusts from Secondary Smelters (e.g., copper, aluminum) 

F. Any Wasta as Designated by the Laboratory Manager 

G. All Wastes, Liquids or Solids, from the following: 

1. Electrical Utility Company 

2. Natural Gas PipeUne Transmission Company 

3. SOlvent Recovery, Reuse or Recycling Unit 

4: Oil Recovery, Reuse or Recycling Unl1 

5. 0~ Maintenance Centers 

6. Pond Closures (includlng Pond Sludges and Dredgings) 

7. Remedial Action Supertund Sites 

8. RCRA Corrective Action Project• 

9. Timber/Lumber Treating Facility 

10. Hydraulic Equipment 

11 . ENRAC Remedial Action PrOjects• 

• Unless demonstrated non-TSCA 

s 

Revision 1 

October1991 

VES01123~ 
PCB Screening Polley 

- 12. --Heat Transfer Units · ·- · · · - - .. _ -

13. Metal Machining (Cutting) Operations 

14. Pesticide/Herbicide Manufacturing 

15. Ink and Pigment Manufacturing 

16. Oil Based Paint Manufacturing 

17. Paper Recycling Operations 

18. Roofing Fe~ Manufacturing or Processing 

19. Auto Fk.rff 

20. Non-WMI Waste Trea1ers 

21. Chlorobenzene Manufacturing 

rv. PROCEDURES 

A. Pre-Acceptance Samples 

Pre-acceptance samples are to be analyzed tor. PCBs by a laboratory if 

the waste stream meets any of the criteria spee!fted n section n1 above. 

B. Incoming Waste Shipment Samples 

The need to analvze Incoming waste shipment samples for PCBs will be 

established by the results of the sales sample analysis and evaluation of 

the sales sample Waste Profile Sheet information against this policy. 

Table II describes the overaR requirements discussed below. 

If a waste stream does not meet any of the PCB suspect criteria, then 

there is no specffic requirement to perform PCB antJyses on the incoming 

shipments of this waste stream unless specifically required under a Waste 

Analysis Plan (W AP). 

6 

Revision 1 

October 1991 

VESOII24( 

l 

l 
' - I 

PCB Screening Policy 

_II a~~--~eam meet~ ~y of ~ __ PCB ~sp:ect Criterlll .. t_he .. s~~ .. 

sample analysis indicates PCBs are less than 5 ppm' Of' the regulatory Umlt 

(The EP-.( TSCA office has recently specified concentrations of less than 

2 ppm PCBs in treatment residues for approval and refer to Table I for 

listed code specifications}, wtlldlever IS lower, then the laboratory/tec:hnical 

manager must specify on the Waste Management Oecisron (WMD) whether 

PCB analyses oo incoming waste shipments are reql.ired and, if so, the 

frequency of analyses. 

' The specific criterion of 5 ppm Is the typical laboratory reporting limit for PCB 

analysis. It Is a conservative approach to protecting the integrity of non·TSCA facilities. 

7 

Revision 1 

October 199\ 

! ' 

; 

. i 

i 

i 

VES011241 
PCB Screening Policy 

.. TABLE 11 

---------- 1 ... ~ I 

Lllb D.ca 

CWU or Gan«1tor 

---

......._ 

Not • Surpoct >6 ppm PCI < 6 ppm PCI 

(WMDI 

No Action 

lloquitod 

Meets PCB Suspect 

Crlt.erla 

*Sales Sample 

PCB Results 

( Yaal 

( WM' DI 

Frequency 

ol Testing 

l YM or No I 

I WMDI' II Yar Froq•oncy 

ol Tolling 

Receiving Procedures 

·- - ---------------·--·······-··-·----

No 

Yes <5 ppm 

Yes >5ppm 

• or the regulatory ~mit, whichever is lower. 

8 

No specific actions required. 

Specl1y In Waste Management Decision 

(W~D) whether PCB analyses on 

incoming waste shipments are required 

and, II so, the frequency of analyses. 

WMD must specify that PCB analyses 

are required on incoming waste shipments 

and must specify the frequency of those 

analyses. 

Revision 1 

October 1991 

VESOI124i 

I 

i~ 
(i lradl Waste Incineration 

7 Moble A"lflltW 

s ... goo.ll. 82201·•Qj59 

6181271·2804 

'l'R&D. 11&8-r.: IRCJR .... 'I'JOII 

DIOZJR 808P8C'I' ARaLY818 POLICY 

I' 

.· .. 

• 

VESOll243 
'I'IU DIOJCII &JIALYSIS POLICY 

I . llmtODOCTlOI 

Trade Waate Incineration ia iaplementinv thia policy for the 

acreeninv of waatea which mar contain diosina. Thia .policy wi ll identify the typea of waatea which auat be analysed for 

dioxin• or dioxin pr ecurs ors prior to approval for accept ance 

aa a waate atream at TMl. Implementation of thia pol i cy will 

provide a meana ot enaurin9 that potentiaLly dio:llin 

contaminated waatea a r e analysed for dioxin cont.nt aad 

aubaeqllentlr ~aved appropriately accordiD9 to applicabl e 

stat e and federal re9ul ationa . The fi nal decision to .-nave 

a diosin bearinv waate •uat be made accordinv to . the 

condi tiona and reatrictiona of the voverni119 facilitr W~e 

Analyaia Pl an and operatinv pe~ta . :~ 

II. POLICY 

A. Waate atre..a cont.-plated for aanav.-.nt at TWI will be 

aubjeeted to the Diodn Suapect w .. te Criteria durinv the 

deciaion eval uation proceaa of the profilin9 procedure. 

B. lfaaha which are deterained to -et the Diosin Suspect · Waate criteria will require anahai a for diosin 

precuraora prior to acceptance and aaoav..aot t or 

treat.ant and diapoaal at t he facilitJ. 

c. Mutea which are found to contain diosin preouraora at or 

above t be aite action l evel for precuraora will require diosin analraia prior to acceptance and manavement for 

treat-.nt and diapoaal at the facilitr. 

D. llut .. which are found to contai n dioai na at or above the 

aite action l evel will not be accepted for lii&Dav-nt for 

tr .. ta.nt and diapoaal at the facility until auch time 

that treat .. nt and diapoaal are all owed accordinv to tbe 

collllitiou and r .. trictiona of the ~overnin9 hcilitr 

w .. te Analraia Pl an and operatinv per.ita . 

VESOJI24< 

'. 
111. DIOXII IUSPICY WASYK CR1~ .. IA 

The followin9 criteri a has been developed for defining a vaate 

as diozin su1pect. These criteri a are intended to suppl ... nt 

e:dsting reqllir-nh which ... , have been imposed through permit conditions , adminis t rative orders, or other agr e ... nts 

vitb federal or stat e authoritiea . waatea aonaidered under 

the .. criteria r- in aub ject to a ll uiating conditions 

impoaed hf Chemical Waste Management poliaiea and 

environmental directivea . 

A. 

•• 

Generator Defi ned Diczin Waste . ... .... . 

ADJ vaate for which the generator baa indicated on the 

"Generator' • Waate Material Profile Sheet" or aDJ other 

supporting documentation that dio1ina or diodll 

preauraora are preaent at aDJ' l aval . : i· 

w .. tea Proa the Pollowing : 

Theae w .. tea ·vi 11 be aonaidered aa auapect if they IUJ' 

have been aub jeat to hiatoric.al aontaaination froa 

diozina or diozin preauraora , or if the waataa contain a 

known diozin or diozin precuraor .. tarial . 

1 . Ti~er/Lu.ber Treating Pacilitiea. 

2. Peaticide/ Rerbiai de Manufacturing Paailitiea . 

3. Manufacturera or Proa .. aea Uain91 

a) · mono- , di-, tri-, or tetraoblorophenola, and 

their cbloro-pbeno&J derivative acida , eatera , .-i-na , and other aal t a . b) peatachlorophanol a) .aoo-, di- , tri-, tetra·, penta-, or 

hezachlorobensenea . d ) triohlorophenozrpropionia acid (ailvez) 

e) trichlorophenozracetic acid (2, 4, 5- T) 

f ) hezachl orophene 

4. Coabuation pro4uota froa aource1 outside of the 

CWM/ WMX Teahnologiea fa.ilr of co.paniea where auch 

coabuation occurred under uncontrolled conditione 

and t he fo~tion of dio&ina or diosin related 

ca.pounda ia auapeated to have occurred (i.e. the 

coabuation of PVC, CPVC , etc.). 

c. Wutea b .. riog •rA beaardoua vute nwabera POll , P039, ~001 . ~015 , ~016 , ~030 , K042 , K043 , ~015, ~099 , ~1 05, 

U49 , n5o, and n51. 

l· 

I 

~ 

~ 

I 

. i: 

i 

. 

'· 

i· 

I 

:i 

' 

I' 

I' 

)' 

I. 

I 

.. 

j I 

' ' 1! 

I I 

; I 

' ' I 

" l ; 

'' 

VES011 245 
. •·. 

} 

IV • PllOCEDO'UB 

Diozin precursor analyaia lll&l' be conducted b}' HPLC, GC or 

GC/MS, or i~ a .. a:r acre en technique• f a ll owi ng approved EPA methoda or CMK MOdification• of such 

-thoda . 

l . Profile Approval 1-.pl ea : Profile approval aa.plea 

are to be anal:rud for diozin precuraon if the 

waste stream meets an:r of the criteria apeeified t~ 

aection III above. Waatea which are being reproUled or recertified due to ohangea in t~ 

procea1 9enerati n9 the waate, or aa a reaul t a·f 

generator information gathered 4urill9 tbe nap- oonforaance reaolution durin; incoaing anal}'ah -r:e 

alao aubjeot to the criteria apecified in 1ect~ 

111 . i 

2. Incoain9 Waate Shi~t Sample•: 

a} The need to anal}'ae incoain; vaate ahipaent aa8plea for diollin precuraora will be 

eatabliahed b:r the reaultl of the profile approval aa.ple anal}'aia and an evaluation of 

the vaat• pt'ofi le aheet infor..tion a;ainat the criteria eatabliahed in thia polio:r. 

b) If a vaate atreu do .. not Met an}' of the 

criteria eatabliahed in aection lli of this 

polio}', then there ia no apecific requir.-.nt 

to perfora dio11n preouraor anal}'aia on the 

inooain9 abi~t auplea of tbe waate atreu. 

c) It the receipt .. terial d-.onatratea a cban9e 

in the vaate fro. the profile approval auple (i. e. infor.ation provided b}' the 9-erator 

duri n; the non-oonfor.&Doe reaolution 

proceaa ), and it now ... ta tbe criteria 

eatabl iahecl in aection li 1 of thi1 polio}' , then diolin precuraor anal}'lia DNat be 

perforaed aa part of the incoain9 anal}'ail . 

d ) Maatea which .. et the criteria eatabli1hed in 

section III of thi1 polio}' aad wbich e&hibited 

negative screen reaults for dio&in precuraora durin9 profile approval anal:r1is will not be 

acreened upon receipt. 

• j 

:. 

•', 

VES011246 
\ 

·' 

I. 

e ) Hastes which meet the criteria established in 

section 1!1 of thia policy and which eahibited 

poaitive s creen r esulta for dioain precursors during profile approval analrais will be 

screened upon receipt if the profile approval 

s creen indieated o~ n precuraora above the 

precursor threabold value , and subsequent dio:dn analysis confiraed dioaina below t he 

dioain tbr eahold value (or not present). The inc~ng acreen wi ll be limited to only thoae 

precursors which were detected during profile 

approval analyai s. 

If the incOidng screen indicates the pr esence 

of dioai n precursors, incoming · diolin 

confirmation anal ysis will be conducted if the 

l evala of pncuraora i n tile inca.ing screen 

eaceed the l evala of precursors in the profile approval analysis with t he follovtPv 

guide linea : · ~ · 

i ) Profile approva l precursor screen vu 

poaitive , dioain confirmation analyais 

vaa negative , nona detected. - and - The incoming screen indicates precursor l evels greater than a factor of 10 tiMes 

above the profile approval raaul t a . 

ii) Profile approval pr ec11rsor screen waa 

positive, dioxin confi~tion anahsia 

vu negative, but dioain v .. detected 

below thruhol4 value. 

- ancl - The inco.ing acraao indicates precursor 

l evels greater than a prorated l aval 

above the profile approval raaulta . The 

prorated laval is de e~ned aa fol l ows: 

(DTL / DLD) X PPL 

whe r e : 

Dioain Analyaia : 

DTL • dioxi n threahold laval 

DLD = dioain l evel detected 

(profile approval ) 

PPL = profile approval 

precuzaor level 

Dioain analysis will be perf ~. with the concurrence 

of the generator of the vaata, foll owing a dioain 

precursor acraan which indicataa a pracuraor praaant at 

or above 0.01\ by wei ght. Detection liMita for dioain . analrsia wil l be aat at a l part per .tllion tbreahol d. 

VES011247 
V. ODIIJ'!IOIIII 

A. 

II . 

c. 

D. 

•• 

Diorio : General hlllil 7 DU\e tor e~unda known aa 

polrchlorinated dibenso~p-dioxina ( PCDDa). Speoifioalll', 

"dio:r.in" h tnicall7 uaad to refer to 2, 3,7 , 8-

tatra chlorodibanso-p·di oxin, or 2 ,3,7,8-tcDD. 

Diozin prequraora : Chemical• which when manufactured 

have been shown to contain diodna aa a wuta or byproduct. Diodn precuuora are of liailar chemical co ition to diozina. Sa.e aaa.plea are 2,4,5-

triehlorophenol. a il vaz, and huachlor ophene : , . 

Jill&: Hi gh Presaura Liquid chr-atognphJ. Thb 

anal71is t echnique il uaed i n CNK method 192- 78 , "The 

Analyaia of Chlorophenozy Berbieidea uaiD9 KPLC" . , 

.. ':" . oc, GC/HS: Oaa Chr-tQ9raph.J, GC/IIaaa Spectroacpft. Analyaia inatrumentation uaed for the apecitic 

identification of n_.roua organic e~o1111da . T7pioal17, the -thoda for cruutification of apaoific diodna or 

dio&in preeuraora uaa oc or OC/MI tachAiqu ... 

lWl!!Q""' acrean: A quick, aeai·quutitativa -thod of 

idantifring the pra.aanc e of a apeoifio ehlllical or 

chllaical faailJ. speoifieallJ, SW-846 Met hod ~010, 

I~o••••r Teat for the Praaenoe of Pentachlorophenol. 

1:\ftiDIOX.ft'r 

.......•• " 

j 

' 

i .. 

i 

L· ; · 

VES01 1248 
'I 

POL ICY AEYI EW Of PAOF ILE OHSHTUi! i~ 

suapect p.,. pol i c y 

r « --..&....--> 

COndlict. d1oxi n 

precureor 

ana l yah 

Not auipact ·par po 1 t<.v 

I . 

'rcic eed wfth dec·fa lon· proc•••• no pre- curaor ana lyeh 

Oio~ in precuraora Precursors not found I f ound .-«:-'---»·- - ----------. v 

Ooes aener etor want 

to have d i oxin t eeti na per formed? 

No No dioxin t aetlne 

> 

vv .. . . 

Conduct dioxin 

analya i e 

T 

Wu d ioxin 

det ected? 

Ye • ) 

>> Dany da cilion 

Javel 

No precuraor te1tine 

on lncomlne waet a 

Yee Denw deci a ion or 

»- raj~t ahiJIIM"t ~ I 

v No Y No 

Approva dec1a lon, conduct precuraor 

ena lya l a on i ncONina 

waste shi p!lllntl 

T 

Ia ne~; ne waete 

ahi11111ent precureor l eve'l > 10 tl-• t ha 

profi le analya i e 

pre-curaor leval'P 

~ Ya • 

Oola the ..,._..tor 

want to have d i oxin 

teat tne perfo~?.· 

Yaa 

Coftduct dioxin 

analyaia 

I 

v 

jw .. dlo;in det ected? 

V No . Accept t he waate ahipr~~~nt 

---L--------------- Approve dechlon (o---r --- accept -----~ 

waet e eh ~ta , conduct pracuraor anal y1ia on lncoalne 

wast e ah ~t• 

----»----., 

No Accept the 

f-. > waet• 1h ~t 

NO. llejact the ' ) . waeta ahi~t 

< 

Modify dec fa i on 

~~~ analyl t a reaul ~l 

for rat to of pre- . cureora t o di ox11'1';. if neceaaary 

< 

' .• 

•• t he pra :.. 

rat.cl i ncoillint 

wuu ahf ~ 

it ~: riol' 

• «ir-*'. l!'toid il 

li¥11 ( f'.JiJM· < .. • ~Hey IKt I !Sn:· I.V. ....,, 

2,, • • til ? . . ' . . ~ .. . .. ,. 

· No' v· vwe· . . .. . .. 

Acefj~·· 

waate 

lhi PIMftt,. 

"· 

'· 

I 

1 ! . 

' 

l. 

VESOI 1249 
VES011250.pdf 
Ogulei, David 

From: 

Sent! 

To: Subject: 

Attachments: 

David, 

Warchol, Dennis <dennis.warchol@veolia.com> 

Fnday, December 20, 2013 11 :40 AM 

Ogulei, David 

Veolia's Waste Analysis Plan 

Veol1a'sWAP.pdf 

Attached pursuant to your r.:quest is the curreut Veolia Waste Ana ~is Plan. Please call if you have any 

questions. 

VES011250 
VES011251 .pdf 
Ogulei, David 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Dennis J Warchol <dennis.warchol@veoliaes.com> 

Wednesday, July 17, 20131:53 PM 

Ogulei, David 

Nancy L Paddock 

RE: Trtle V Perm~ Appficalion 

201307171320.pdl 

Attached is a copy of Veolia's May 31, 2013 Response and associated attachments to the Agency's NotiOcation of 

Incompleteness letter. A copy was also sent out today via Federal EJcpress Please call if you have any questions. Thanks 

From: Ogulei, David (mallto:Ogulei.David@epa.gov] 

Sent Tuesday, July 16, 2013 11:56 AM 

To: Dennis J Ward'lol 

Cc: Nancy L Paddock; Damico, Genevieve 

Subject: RE: Trtle V Permit Application 

Yes, that time would wcrk. Genevieve Damico will also join us. 

Please call us at (312) 886-1304 

From: Dennis J Warchol (maolto:dennis.warchol@veoliaes.oom] 

Sent Tuesday, July 16, 2013 11:12 AM 

To: Ogulei, Da'lid 

Cc: Nancy L Paddock 

SubJect: Title V Permit Application 

David, 

Can we call you at around 9 AM tomorrow to discuss your comments. I will have Nancy Paddock on the call who works 

for me and Kathy Strut berg our consultant who helped us with this application. If that time works, we will call you in 

your office. Thanks 

SERVICE FIRST SAFETY ALWAYS 

Dennis J. Warchol 

EHS Manager 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L L.C. 

Trade waste nclnera on Facbity 

#7 Mobile Avenue 

Sauget, IL 62201 

618-271-2804 (ext.169) 

618-271-2128 (fax) 

Dennis warchoi@VeollaES.com 

www.YeohaES com 

This e-ma~ message from Veolfa ES Technical Solutions, LLC is for the sole use of ~e intended recipienl(s) and may 

contain confidential and pri'lileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If 

you are not the intended recipient, please communicate with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the 

original message and delete It from al computers. 

VES011251 
VES011252.pdf 
G)veOLIA 

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 

May 31, 2013 

Ms. Genevieve Damico 

Air Permits Section 

USEPA Region 5 

77 West J..ckson Blw. 

Chlc3go, IL 60fi04-3590 

Re: Veolia ES Technical SoiU1ions, LLC Part 71 Renewal Appllcafton 

Response to Notification of incompleteness, May 16, 2013 

Dear Ms. Damico; 

Veo{la ES Tecllnical Solutions, LL.C. located In Sauget, Illinois (Veolla) received correspondence from 

US EPA Region 5 (EPA) regarding its application tor renewal o( the facility's Part 71 Permit to Operate No. 

V·IL·12716300103.08-01. The notification o( Incompleteness Qsted sll< items tor which EPA determined 

that additional irlormatlon Is required In order to be deemed ocmplete. Veoflll response to these Items Is 

presented In the fdlowing dlscussbl. 

Since the original Part 71 permit was Issued, SePtember 12, 2008, Veolla has not Implemented any 

operational changes and has not constructed any new equipment since the final application Information 

fOf Permit No. V·IL-12716399193.08-01 was submi!Uld and reviewed by EPA T\\o new regulations, the 

Boiler MACT ard RICE MACT, were published since the exlsting permit was Issued and the applicable 

requirements tor these regulations have been addressed In the renewal appllcellon. Based on this and in 

the interest of avoilfing <lJpllcation of materials already previously submitted, Veo .a nalied on crossreferencing the prellfous application and existing Part 71 permit to obtain !ntormation required on 

appWcation forms. Veoia prepared the Part 71 permit renewal application In this manner based on 

guidance conta:ned in USEPA's "Federal Opernting Permit Program (40 CFR Part 71 ) INSTRUCTION 

MANUAL FOR PART 71 FORMS". 

Excerpt from lll$truclion Manual: 

Cross-Referendng of Information Already Provided Allowed 

If you nave previously submitted Information to t=PA or to an approved State 

agenc:1 that is required to be submitted in these application forms, you may either 

repeal the informslion in the space provided or cross-reference the relevant 

materials or documents. Cross-referencing is allowe.d for materials that ere 

currertly applicable and avaRabJe to the public and the permitting authority. If the 

meteiiBis do not meet this siandllfd they must be submitted as en litachment {o 

tfJe form. A/1 crostMeferenc&d materials will be placed in the public docket on the 

permh action, uriess they are published and/or readily avaHable. 

The detailed ~onse to each item In EPA's llCltificatlon Is prov1ded in the cfJSCUSson below. 

ITEM 1: CITATION AND DESCRIPTION OF ALL APPUCABLE REQUIREMENTS. 

As stated above and In ltoe permit renewal application narrative, there have been no physical changes to 

ex!smg emisson units, no new construc:tion of emission un~ and no change to 1he operation of existing 

emission units since the submittal and review by EPA ol the permit appllcalion to· the existing Permit No. V~L-1 271 6399 93.08-01. There are two new regulations that were published that affe<:t the Veolia 

fdty as touo·NS: 

17 Mobile Av.nue. Sauget, IL 62201 

(IU) 211-78().1 

www.veoll-..cotn 

VESOll252 
...... .~~ ... ·-· ... · ..... .. ·· .. 

G)veouA 

ENVIRONMEI'ITAL SERVICES 

• 40 CFR 63 Subpart DDDOD National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilm and Process 

Heaters. 

• 40 CFR 63 SUbpart ZZZZ National Emisston Standards for HaurdotJs AJr Polluiants for 

Stationaty Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines. 

The new appficable requirements that will apply or have become effective during the term of the perm~ 

are described in Section III.A end llt.D of the renewal application. Also included are tile effectiVe dates of 

these regulation!. VeoHa Will be in compliance with an applicable requirements as ollha effectiVe date of 

each rule. 

All other applicable requirements are listed In the existing Part 71 perm~ referenced above and In the 

appfocation as in:flcated below. Veolia, therefore, refers EPA to Secllon IV of the May 2007 application 

narrative in which appicable requirements are descrtled in detail and Section VI In which oompliance 

demonstration methods are described In detail. In addition, Sections 2.1, 2.2. 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7 and 

2.8 of lhe existirg Prut 71 permit lor the translation of the applicable requirements contalned in the May 

2007 application inlo permit conditions. 

ITEM 2: INITIAl COMPLIANCE PLAN AND CERTIFICATION. 

Veolia refers EPA to the FORM I-COMP that was provided in Section I oflhe appicaUon submitted May 

2007 including a Compliance Slaws Table entided 'Addendum to Section 1: Form 1-comp". Form 1-. 

COMP references Section IV of the appiic&Uon narrative in which applicable requflements are descriled 

in detail a.nd Section VI rn which compjiance demonstration methods ate described In detail. The 

compliance status tor each t.nlque combination of awlicable requlremenls Is lndicE.ted In the Compliance 

Statlls Table rEierenced above. There are no applicable requirements lor whlcb the source in not in 

oompliance, therefore, no compliance plan/schedule Is required. 

ITEM 3: DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION OF EMISSIONS ESTIMATION METHODS. 

Veolla refers EPA to Section V of tne May 2007 application for d~uaalon and ju3tifica"on of emission 

factors, maximum hourly design rates and maximum hourly emission rates with the exception of the drum 

crusher. Polential 1o emil rares provided rn the EMISS forms and the PTE lcnns are based on a 

combination of conslrucUon permit limits, 40 CFR 63 Subpart EEE limits and maximum design rate 

calculations as provided in Section V.C of the May 2007 application. All of these !mas also appear in the 

existing Part 71 permit. 

The drum crusher emission factor and emission estimates were re-evaluated as part of the renewal 

applieation. The revised emlssion factor and Its basis are provided In Section lfi.C and Appendix A of the 

renewal permft application. 

In addition, dumg preparation of this response, sevel'lll typographical errors were found on the emission 

calculation forms. Revised forms are Included with thiS documenl 

ITEM 4: LISTING OF ALL ACTIVE AIR PERMrTS AND CONSENT ORDERS ISSUED BY STATE OR 

FEDERAl AGENCY. 

Veolia refers EPA lo Section lA of the May 2007 application lor the permit history of the faclllty. The 

Part 71 permft is the only one Hsted in Section K of the FORM GIS because the existing Part 71 perm~ 

oontains all fedei'olly enforceable applicable requirements from the construction permits Issued by the 

Illinois Department of the Environment (!EPA). There have been no construction permits issued since the 

Part 71 permit was Issued and no Part 71 permit modificafions have OCCUlTed. 

17 MobMo AvonUI, Sauget IL U201 

(611) Z71-210' 

www.wofiMt.ccm 

VES011253 
G)veouA !;NVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 

ITEM 5: PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAMS AND FACILITY PLOT PLAN. 

Veorta refers EPA to Secflon Ill behind the F~gure tab In !he May 2007 appllcalion for labeled site layouts 

and process flow diograms. There have been no changes to the diagrams. 

ITEM 6: USTING AND DESCRIPTION OF INAPPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS. 

VeoUa refers EPA to Appendix B of the May 2007 p~ ation lor ltlls lrsttng. 

CERTIFICATlON 

In accordance 'Aith 40 CFR 71.5(d), the foUowlng certiflcation Is provided regarding the content or this 

document and hs at!3chments. 

l certify under penahy of law ltlat, based 0<1 infonna!ion and belief fonned after reasonable inqully, lhe 

statements and information contained in this docurrent and Its attachments are true, accurate and 

complete. 

AuthoriZed Signature 

Name (signed): 

Name (typed): Douglas Harris 

Title: General Manager 

, Mobile Avenue. Sauget. IL 12201 

(618) 2.11·2804 

www.¥e0111es com 

. 

r 

VES011254 
ft EA~Uni ed States !W!: Envi o~men ai iPro oct on 

~7 Agency OMB No. 2060-0336 APProval Expires 06/30/2015 

Federal Operating Permit Program (40 CFR Part 71) 

POTENTIAL TO EMIT IPTE} 

For each unit with emissions that count towards applicability, list the emissions unit ID and the PTE for 

the air pollutants listed below and sum them up to show totals for lhe facility. You may flnd it helpful to 

complete form EM ISS before completing this form. Show other pollutants not listed that are present in 

major amounts at tile facility on attachment in a similar fashion. You may round 'lalues to the nearest 

lenth of a ton. Also reoort facilitv totals In section J of form GIS. 

Regulated Air Pollutants and Pollutants for whlth the Source is Major 

Emissions Unit 10 (tonsfyr) 

NOx VOC S02 PM10 co Lead HAP 

UNITI2 4.0 0.9 7.7 2.80 6,6 0.0221 11.!1§ 

UNITf3 4.0 0.9 7.7 2.91 6.6 ~ 10.40 

UNIT#4 61.6 3. t ~.76 8.82 13.88 0.0895 11 ~ 

LABPACK REPACK 1.45 0.2418 

MP-1 0.2387 0.0495 

MP-2 0.2387 0.0495 

DRUM CRUSHER 3.87 0.248 

TANK 112 0.1348 0.0002 

TANK #4 0.0203 3.65 x to" 

TANK #6 0.0133 2.40 X til'" 

E PA Form 5900-85 

VES011255 
Emissions Unit 10 

TANKII!8 

TANK #10 

TANK#20 

TANK ~O 

TANK#40 

TANK ISO 

TANK #GO 

TANK#300 

TANKI302 

TANK#304 

ANK~06 

TANK#308 

TANK #310 

TANK#312 

TANKI314 

EPA Form 5900-85 

.......... ' ' ··--

Regulated Air Po!Jutants and Pollutants for which the Source is Major 

(tonslyr) 

NOx voc $02 PM10 co 

0.0256 

0.0125 

0.0460 

0.0203 

0.0143 

0.0085 

0.0257 

0.1454 

0.4:C24 

0.3094 

1.29 

1.62 

2.18 

3.23 

0.4738 

Lead HAP 

4.61 X 10"6 

.2~ X 10-< 

0.0001 

3.65 X 10.s 

2.58 X 1<f 

1.53 X 10 .. 

4.62 X 1<f 

0.0003 

0.0008 

0.0006 

0.0023 

0.0029 

0.0039 

0.0058 

0.0009 

• i 

I 

I 

I. 

' 

VES011256 
' " .... ·, . . " .. · . . · . . 

Regulated Air Pollutants and Pollutants for which the Source is Major 

Emissions Unit JO (tonslyr) 

NOx voc S02 PM10 co Lead HAP 

BF BLDG 2.56 0.0188 

BOlLER tl1 4.51 0.248 0.027 0.343 3.79 

FUGITIVE EQUIP lEAKS 0.0390 0.0014 

~ ~ ~ 0.03 ~ !l.QS Q,2 .Q..QQQ.1 

EGEN2 0.42 ~ ~ ~ ~ M Q.QQQ1 

FACIIL TY TOTALS 74 ~ 23.§2 §§.Z,§ 14.~ 1!.Q 0.~ 33.§i 

EPA Form 5900.85 

VES011257 
~ Er.vlronmental ProteotiM ! · ft EA~ United States · 

'i:,... Agency OMB No. 206()..0336. Approval Expires 06/3012015 

Federal Operating Permit Program (40 CFR Part 71) 

EMISSION CALCULATIONS IEMISSI 

Calculate potential to emit (PTE) for applicability purposes and actual emissions for fee purposes for 

each emissions unit, control device, or emative operating scenario Identified in section I of form GIS. 

If form FEE does not need to be submitted with the application, do not calculate a~Jal emissions. 

A. Emissions Unlt iD Un~ #2 

B. Identification and Quantification of Emissions 

First, ilst each air pollutant that is either regulated at the unit or present in major arrounts, then list any other 

regulated pollutant (for fee calculation) not already listed. HAP may be simply listed as "HAP." Next, 

calculate PTE for appicabnity purposes and actual emissions for fee purposes for each pollutant Do not 

calculate PTE for air pollutants listed solely for fee purposes. Include all fugitives for fee purposes. You may 

round to the nearest ienth of a ton for ye811yvalues or tenth of a pound for hourly values. 

Emission Rates 

Actual Potential to EmK 

Annual 

~r PoUutants EmiSsions Hour1y Annual CAS No. (lonslyr) Qblhr) (tonslyr) 

co 2.55 6.6 

VOM 8.0 0.9 

NOx 3.26 4.0 

PM2.6 0.1405 0.6156 

PM10 0.6388 2.6 

Part 0.6388 2.8 

sox 1.21 7.7 

HCVCI2 2.19 9.92 

EPA Fo rm 5900-84 

VES011258 
I • ~ .. 

Emission Rates 

Actual Potential to Emtt 

Annual 

Air Pollutants Emissions Hourly Annual CAS No. (tonstyr) (lblhr) (tonstyr) 

Hg 0.0028 0.0125 743&-97~ 

As 0.0020 O.UOB8 7440·36·2 

Be 0.0020 0.0088 7 <14041-7 

Cd 0.0050 0.0221 7440·43·9 

cr 0.0020 0.0088 744047·3 

Sb 0.0020 0.0088 7440-31·5 

Pb 0.0050 0.0221 7439-92-1 

Nl 0.0020 0.0088 7440-02-Q 

Dioxln/Furan 4.38 x 10 .. 1.92 X 10"8 

EPA Form 5900-84 

VESOI1259 
' . . . •: ..... : .... . 

n EA~ United States ~ . E~vironmental Prot4ction 

~~ Agency OMB No. 206()..()336 Apll[oval Expires 0613012015 

Federal Operating Permit Program (40 CFR Part 71) 

EMISSION CALCULATIONS (EMISS) 

Calculate potential to emit (PTE) for applicability purposes and actual emissions for fee purposes for 

each emissions unit. control device, or alternative opera~ng scenario identified in s~on I of form GIS. 

If form FEE doc<: not ne<od to be ubrn~ted with the application. do not calculate actual emissions. 

A. Emis sions Un it 10 Unit #3 

B. ldentlflcatlon and Q uantification of Em issions 

First, list each air poll;tant that is eithe< regulated at the unit or present in mafor arrounts, then list any other 

regulated pollutant (for tee calculation) not already listed. HAP may be simply listed as "HAP." Next, 

calculate PTE fOf applicability purposes and actual emissions for fee purposes for each pollutant. Do not 

calculate PTE for air pollutants listed solely for fee purposes. lndude all fugitives for fee purposes. You may 

round to the nearest tenth of a ton for yearly values or tenth of a pound for hourly values. 

Emission Rates 

Actual Potential to Emit 

Annual 

Air Pollutants Emissions Hour1y Annual CAS No. (tonsfyr) (lblhr) (lons/yr) 

co 2.65 6.6 

VOM 8.0 0.9 

NOx 3.26 4.0 

PM2.5 0.1462 0.6404 

PM10 0.6646 2.91 

Part 0.6646 2.91 

sox 1.21 7.7 

HCVC12 2.22 10.03 

EPA Form 5900-84 

I 

VES011260 
Actual 

Mnual 

Air Ponutanls Emisslons 

(tonslyr) 

Hg 

As 

Be 

Cd 

Cr 

Sb 

Pb 

Ni 

Dioxln/Furan 

EPA Form 5900-84 

Emission Rates 

Potential to Em~ 

Hourly 

(lb/hr) 

0.0029 

0.0021 

0.0021 

0.0052 

0.0021 

0.0021 

0.0052 

0.0021 

~x10'~ 

Annual 

(tonslyr) 

0.0130 

0.0092 

0.0092 

0.0229 

0.0092 

0.0092 

0.0229 

0.0092 

1.20x 10'7 

CAS No. 

7439-97-0 

7440·3~·2 

7440-41 -7 

7440-43-9 

7440.47-3 

7440-31-5 

7439-92·1 

7440-02-0 

j 

I 

I 

I 

VES011261 
' . 

ft EA~ United States :w.! EnvironMontal Protection ~i' Agency OMB No. 2060-0336, Approval Expires 06130/2015 

Federal Operating Permit Program (4 0 CFR Part 71) 

EMISSION CALCULATIONS (EMISS) 

Calculate potential to emit (PTE) for appiicabilit'/ purposes and actual emissions for fee purposes for 

each emissions unit, control device, or alternative operating scenario identified in section I of form GIS. 

If form FI!E doe3 not need to be • ubmitted with the 8Piliication, do not calcuate actual emissions. 

A. Emissions Unit 10 Unit #4 

B. Identification and Quantification of Emissions 

First. list each air pollutant that Is either regulated at the unit or present in major amounts, then list any other 

regulated pollutant (for fee calculation) not already fisted. HAP may be simply listed as "HAP." Next, 

calculate PTE for applicability purposes and actual emissions for fee purposes for each pollutant. Do not 

calculate PTE for air pollutants listed solely for fee purposes. Include all fugitives tor fee purposes. You may 

round to the nearest tenth of a ton for yearty values or tenth of a pound for hourly ~a ues. 

Emission Rates 

Adual Potential to Emit 

Annual 

Air Poftulanls Emissions Hourly Annual CAS No. (tons/Yr) (lblhr) (tonstyr) 

co 8.03 13.86 

VOM 8 3.1 

NOx 14.61 61.6 

PM2.5 0.4432 1.94 

PM10 2.01 Ul 

Part 2.01 ~ 

SOx 4.23 50.76 

HCI/CI2 2.36 10.40 

EPA Form 5900·84 

. 

I i: 

I 

I. 

VES011262 
... fi .. • ....... • • . • 

Emission Rates 

Actual Potential to Emit 

Annual 

AJr Pollutants Emissions Hourly Annual CAS No. (tonslyr) (lblhr) (lons/yr) 

Hg 0.0090 0.0393 7439-97-6 

A:s 0.00&4 0.0278 744D-38·2 

Be 0.00&4 0.0278 7' 40-41 -7 

Cd 0.0159 0.0695 744()..43-9 

Cr 0.00&4 0.0278 7440-47-3 

Sb 0.0064 0.0278 7440.31-5 

Pb 0.0159 0.0695 ?439-92·1 

Nl 0.0064 0.0278 7440.02-0 

Dloxin/Furan 5~ l< 10'l .~ l< 10'! 

EPA Form 5900-84 

VES0ll263 
VES011264.pdf 
Og ulei, David 

From: Krag Petterson <kragP@cooperenvlronmental.com> 

Sent: Wednesday, July 17,2013 5:32PM 

To: Ojjulei, David 

Cc: andreag@cooperenvironmental.com; 'John Coope~ 

Attachments: Pall Comments on the Secondary Lead Smelter MACT Rule.pdf, Method 301 Report. pdf; 

Yanca-2006.pdf; EP·D-07-026 Final Report and Appendix A.pdt Xact625 ETV Report.pdt, 

xcem.pdf; Feasibility of using the Xact Multi-metals CEMS as a Mercury MonliOr on Coal Fired 

Power Plants.pdf 

Mr. Ogulei. 

Andrea asked me to provide you with some responses to the questions you sent to her in your email dated June 21, 

2013. My responses to each question are given in red. In addition I have attached several files in response to these 

questions as well. 

tam particularly interested in receiving an update on the following areas: 

1. Commercial availability of the Xact multi-metals CEMS. 

The Xact CEMS is available commercially from Cooper Environmental Services, ll( (CES) Pall COrpomion 

discontonued its locense in early February of this year ind ~lnce thit time CES has IM!en marketing and 

manufacturing both the Xact 625 and Xact 640 and 645 (CEMS models). 

Xact 640 !Multi-Metals CEMS)- All CEMS sales have been In the United States. 

Ell Ully -1 unn 

US Army- 3 urits 

CES- This demJnstratron unot has been used for teslifl!l sponsored by varoous oreaniz:alions including U.S. EPA. 

Electric Power ~esearch Institute (EPRI) and Ell lilly. 

X act 620/625 

Korea- 6 units purchased by Natoonallnstitute of EnVIronmental Research 

China- 9 unru purchased by various Environmental Monitoring Centers 

Canada- 6 unts Ontario Mu·u.stry of Envtronm,.nt. Environment Canada~ Quebec Ministry of Environment, 

University of Toronto, University of Dalhousie, and a smelting faciltty 

New Zealand- 1 unit-secondiry lead smelter 

AustrJIIa 1 unk - Queensland EPA 

United States 3 units-U. Mass., Mossourl DEO. U.S. EPA 

We have known competition for the ambient marlet in China from FPI a nd styray (both Chinese 

comPinies). We have also heard that FPI pnoduces a multl·metals CEMS but cannot confirm thos. 

We have no known competitoon outsode of China. 

2. Applicability/leasibility/reliabihty of the Xact multi-metals CEMS for measuring emissions from heterogeneous 

waste streami. 

The Xact and the filter cheodstry utili~ed by the Xact have de~onstrated the ability to make 

measurements in wide variety of stack conditions. Testing with the Xact and its filter 

cheaistr y has occurred on stacks burning many different fuel types ~ncluding coal (sub·bit, 

lignite and bit uninous), natural gas, and diesel fuel and testing has occurred at facilities 

with different pollution controls like ESP' s, baghouses, and wet scrubbers. The xact has 

been tested on facilities with stack temperatu~s ranging from lee to 459 degr~es Fahrenheit 

and ranging in -oisture content up to at least 20%. In addition the Xact has demonstrated 

VES011264 
accuracy i n the presence of a wide range chemical species likely to be present 1n stack 

effluent. 

one of the strengths of the ~act is that the saaple collection is separated fraN the x- ray 

analysis. This eears that the .are sensitive components of the analysis system are never 

exposed to stack effluent. In addition because the Xact coll ects a saople for a defined 

lenath of time (for example 

15 minutes) this ~ans that the filter trapping chemistry is refreshed with every sample 

eliminating the problems with the chemistry becooing spent over ti.e. Also the Xact employs 

sample dilution prior to the filter trapping allowing many of the stack gas components and 

the dew point to be diluted to their optimal ranges. Finally, we woul1 reca.eend dyn~c 

spiking procedures in performing RATA ·s, siailar to those used by Eli Lilly in their 

Alternative ~nitorin& petition. Dynamic spiking allows the Xact to be challenged by a known 

concentration of metals in the preseuce of potentially interfering cooq>onents from the stack 

gas. 

I've attached two files with details on the range of stack conditions over which the Xact has 

been tested. 

1) Method 381 Roport.pdf - please see section 7 

2) Pall comment; on the Secondary Lead Smelter MACT Rule.pdf - these give additional 

details on places the Xact has been testad. 

3. Case studies documenting application and/or deployment of the Xact multl·metas CEMS. 

Please see the files above. In addition I would add the following documents losted be ow. 

1) Yanca-2006 ·Paper published in the Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 

documenting the Method 301 validation of the ><act. 

2) EP·D-07-026 Ftnal report and Appendix A.pdf- paper documenting the X act's performance during an 

EPA sponsored Small Business Innovative Research grant. The RATA procedures used at Ell Ully were 

performed on a coal fired source. 

3) X act 625 ETV Report.pdf-this was study was done on an ambient unit biA: demonstrates the accuracy 

or the technclogy 

4) Xcem.pdf- an Army Corps of Engineers study of the Xact's performance on Army's hazardous waste 

tnctneratuos. 

5) Feasibility ofustng the ><act Multi·metals CEMS as a Mercury Monitor on Coal ~t red Pow"' Plants.pdfpresentation given at the EUEC conference in 2011 and documents our comparison with Method 308 

for mercury. 

4 list of localions/facllrties where the Xact multi-metals C£MS is currently deployed and operating for any reason. 

l"ve hsted the IGcifrtres were the Xact CEMS was deployed 

1 Eli lily's Tippecanoe Laboratories. Lafayette IN- Deployed and operated for 6 years. The facility is 

under new ownershtp and the Xact Is no longer operated 

2. U.S. '-rmv-Tooele UT munrtions test furnace -It operated periodically at this facility as the u.s. Army 

tested procedures for burning different types of munitions. 

3 U.S. Army-Tooele. UT productton furnace. The Xact was Installed at this f;ocllrty but was never 

opetated because resutatrons were newr requlred for it. 

4. U.S.IIrmy-Crane, IN product ron furnace. The X act was Installed at this facility but was never operated 

because regulations were never required for rt. 

5. How beryfliLm emissions are typically handled given that the X act mufti·metafs C£MS cannot quantrfy beryllium. 

2 

VESOL126: 
Eli lilly was only ~rent thllt utilized the Xact CEMS for com ph; nee purposes it handled the beryll1um Issue as 

follows (quoted f•om Wly's AMP) 

·eecause the XACT Is mcapabfe of measurmg bery11ium (Be), Uly has developed a defaull value lor beryllium em1ssions 

Fommalely. bel)llium is a scarce element thai is not used in Lilly pharmaceuucar manulactunng processes lilly has 

examined all lis manufacturing processes and associated proceu construction malenals (t g alloy sleets) and found no 

lndica1100 ll1al bel")llrum 5ho\lld be present. Therefore, Ully be~eves that a conservallvely calculated defau~ value for 

beryllium is technically d6fenslbte 

Trace levels of beryllium are possible in raw materials and ground water. Uly has sampled b liquid wast• and found only 

sporadic ·hits· of beryllium at levels cl068 to the deJection Umils. Ully has also done some UmHed samplmg of plant trash. 

some of which might be processed In the solid-liquid incinerator, and some low-levels of bet~lrum were repo<ted. For ll1e 

purposes of catcuJaung a conservabw defaun -.ssoo concentration. Ully has assumed llwl all liquid and solid wastes 

fed to the SOiidollquiCIIncl•.,.-ator conttlln Boat thP. maxlmum levels detected: 1.0 ppm in the solid Wll$le and O.Otppm In 

lhe liquid wastes. The defaun em1ssioo concentrabon was than calallale<l usmg tha ma•imum waato food ra'-• from the 

CPT plan, and an l VM system removal efficiency (SRE) of 98% (which is a factor of two less than the design SRE of 99% 

and a factor of 20 tess then the SRE of 99.9% obtained during the CPT of anotller lilly Incinerator with a virtually idenhcel 

scrubber system). The resullmg value was JUSt over 1 ug/dscm. To be mora conselllallve. Ully has chosen 2 ugldscm as a 

default value Therefore a value of 2 ug/dscm will be added to the measured LVM em1ssron before oomparisOn to the 

emission standard hmrt. It the CPT data or any other evidence indlcal.slhe defau" value Is not appropriate. it will be 

adJusted aerordmgly • 

6. Est1mated time ine for deployment of the Xact multi-metals CEMS at an existing h cllity, I e., from order date to 

operat1on. WhJt are the potential ' hallenges? 

We beheve that a 9 month time line b suffiCient and includes manufacturing. shipping Installation and RATA 

testing. 

Krag Pette11on 

Vlce President 

Cooper Environmental Services, LLC 

10180 SW Nimbus Ave Ste. J6 

Portland, OR 97223 

503-670..8 335 

) 

VES01126 
VES011267.pdf 
Using the XactTM Multi-Metals CEMS 

as a Mercury Monitor on a Coal-Fired 

,'/ ..-o llk!JI•...., ... 

Power Plant: A Feasibility Study 

liiiia I !'- ~ ·- I 

- .. CES I I-

••• 

Krag etterson, John A. 

Cooper, Pittenger, Mike 

Nakinishi 

Cooper Environmental 

Services, LLC 

Joe Doherty, Marty Ladner; 

Pall Corporation 

Cooper Environmental Services 

VES011 267 
Executive Summary 

• Review of X actTM Design and Operation 

• GQals of Feasibility Study 

• Results of Laboratory Phase of Study 

• Field Deployment and Performance Test 

Cooper Environmental Services 2 

VES011268 
The XactTM Multi-Metal CEMS 

• 

X.wt... CES 

--· ,

-

••• 

• Developed by Cooper 

Environmental Services (CES) 

• Devel~ as a MuJt1-Metals 

CEMS 

• Based on X-~~ Flourescence 

Analysis (XRF) 

• Beta -gauge type reel-to-reel tape 

drive and sampling technology 

• Can measure up to 20 metals 

simultaneously including Cr, As, 

Cd, Hg, and Pb 

Cooper Environmental Services 3 

VES011269 
X act 

Mt-4• 1• Moni\or 

• 

XactTM-CEMS Connect to Probe and ~Transport Line 

l Main Flow From Stack 

Sampling and Ell 60 to 800 Lpm 

Analysis Module 

T- Drive I ' ll.elo. 1 

& XRF 

-

DopenV 

OlluiiOn 

-

Sub sample onto 

ces 

• • 

L 

Flow 

-

::::: 'I 

Cooper Environmental Services 

I 

1 

Control 

l=l == ~*dule C<lnVd 

-

• 

4 

VESOJ 1270 
en -

en 

>- ...1 

<( 

z 

<( 

c 

z 

<( 

(!) 

z -...1 

0... 

:E 

<( 

en 

:E 

II0 

~ 

-r--

N -

C> -

(/) 

s: 
N 

rN 

...... 

...... 

0 

~ c 

0 

.. 

·-

ca 

.. 

.. 

c 

G» 

u 

c 

0 

u ~ 

~ 

.E 

u 

Q) 

(i) - ca 

J9 

c: 

.. 

Q) 

E 

en 

c: ,g 

-- II 

::.. 

0 

Jj 

... 

Q) 

c 

g. 

0 

0 

0 ·

.. -

ca 

c ·

E -

.. 

G» 

.. 

G» 

Q 
EPA Method 301 

Validated for 

Multi-Metals 

EPA Site 

Certified 

XactTM CEMS 

May 2007 - EPA Clean Air 

Excellence Award 

AMP EPA 

Approved 

-6 Years OnStack Operations 

on Hazardous 

Waste Incinerator 

7 

VES011 273 
Key Goals of Feasibility Study 

• Demonstrate Xact Operation on a Coal Fired Power 

Plant 

• Can the Xact Meet the Mercury Mon1 ing (PS-12A) 

Requirements for Initial Certification Sp ified by the 

Clean Air Mercury Rule (CAMR)? 

Cooper Environmental Services 8 

VES011274 
PS-12A Initial Certification 

Requirements (2007) Current PS 12A 

Requirements Are In Red 

Test 

7- Day 

Calibration 

Check 

Required 

Frequency 

1 x per day • 

for seven • 

days 

Required 

Standards 

Zero 

Upscale 

Linearity Once Hgo Standard at 

Check' Low, Mid and 

Measuremeritligh Span Values 

/ Error 

3-Level Once 

System 

Integrity 

Check 

Once • 

• 

HgCl2 Standard 

Low, Mid, High 

Span Values 

Ontario Hydro 

Method 30B 

(Sorbent Trap) 

Passing Criteria 

5% of Hg Span Value 

-ORLess than 1 !lg/m3 difference 

of referetree ·;sal t!e 

5% -OR- Span Value 

Less than l !lg/m3 difference 

of Span Value 

10% of Span Value 

20% of Reference Method 

-ORLess than 1 ~lg/m3 difference 

Relative 

Accuracy 

Test 

(RATA) Cooper Environmental Services 9 

VES011275 
HgCI2 and Hg0 Generator 

• XactTM did not have a HgCl2 or Hg0 Generator 

• Used Commercially Available Hova 

• HovaCalTM operates by evaporating a so ~ ofHgC12 on 

a heated surface 

" • HgC12 Solution of known concentration was metered at a 

measured flow rate into a measured air flow 

• Hg0 is generated by chemically converting the HgC12 to 

elen1ental Hg (Hova Mere) 

Cooper Environmental Se.rvices 10 

VES011276 
Initial Laboratory Tests - XactTM 

Calibration 

• XRF Portion of the Xact Calibrated Using Thin Film 

stan~tBct Mercury Cal· ation is 

• ThescaQQ.i~~ifM'i~"~i . ·crJWXRF 

equipmetif le naf~is ~t~Men If ers p A IO 

3.3) the gCI ~n(_t 9° Generator 

• ~~ +" C ~a 'o o '· '' teference Flow 

Meter 

I 

• Calibration f . 

mg 

Quantitative 

• QAG Audit ! \pproved 

Altemali ve Monitoring Petition 

Cooper Environmental Services II 

VES011277 
Initial L·aboratory Tests With 

HovaCalTM 

HgCI2 Linearity 

Nominal Average Percent Pass Test 

Concentration Concentration Difference (% of Criteria? 

Level (mg/m3) # of Samples Span) 

Zero (01 Water) 0 6 0.40% Yes 

Low 2 8 -2.37% Yes 

Low Mid 4 6 -0.69% Yes 

High Mid I I 6 -4.10% Yes 

High 18 8 -4.17% Yes 

Also Passed Current 12A Criteria 

Cooper Environmental Services l2 

VES011278 
Initial Laboratory Tests with 

HovaCalTM Elemental Hg L.inearity 

Nominal Average Percent 

Xact MAt Allrsr.esfU :PS!,2Jlia? 

Criteria During 7Laboratory Yes 

EValuation 

High 18 

6 

8 

8.69% 

0.45% 

With New PS12A Criteria 

Nominal 

Concentration Concentration 

Average Percent 

Difference (% of 

Yes 

Yes 

Level {mg/m3) # of Samples Span) Pass Test Criteria? 

Low 4 7 0.57% Yes 

Mid I I 6 4.46% Yes 

High 18 8 0.45% Yes 

Cooper Environmental Services 13 

VES011279 
Field Deployment 

• XactTM installed at POE's Boardman Facility 

• 585 MW Facility, ESP Controls 

• Lab XRF Calibration Used - Not Recali 

• Insta1led and operating within 

2 days 

• Side by side cotnparison with 

Thermo Mercury Freedom Unit 

• Two week field deployn1ent 

• Performed initial performance 

specification including: 

ed in Field 

- 7 Day Calibration Check - Linearity Check 

- Systen1 Integrity Check - RATA - Method 30B 

Cooper Environmental Services 14 

VES011280 
Field Test Arrangement 

e ...... ~ 

CT!-o•~" th.• 1t IV tCI .. \""1 ~ ....... ;"••tllo"""''"'J:lo\1 ..... .. ""·"·'" .. fiN'iUI~III' t ~F 

'"'\'~ J. 

------- MJ:M ,.....,.,..,~ 

1" j ..._ '"·' 

-~-f ._ ___ 1 ,...,. 

l'""F 

:'.1 

p •.....:..C~ _, ~ ~ t- .... ......,, .. .,_ t.o ' .... 

~ .\; 

~J. n 

I!L ~ . _11 ..,~., ... 

""''' 

lloN"O!'I!' I 

-, '--b II 'tj D t-'l)f ~- Xtllol ti~100(1'0W (ti: ... toe>"i'l ·I I :S I~ f Sa!f•lll\l ./ 

....--J ,< (~ (~ 

• X act D . b:)' 0 ........ 

c• "'"'.,..,.... ... STACK GAS '-:- 0 0 

"' 0 "''*'"' l "' 0 .... , .. &., 0 0 

u \.. u L 

Cooper Environmental Services 15 

VESOII281 
Seven Day Drift Test Results 

Zero Drift Results Upscale Drift Results 

CAM R Number CAMR Number 

Ave Rule M et of Point s Ave Rule M et of Points 

Difference on CAMR Difference on CAMR 

Date (% of Span) Average Rule Met (% of Span) Average Rule M et 

3/ 23/ 2009 0.00 Yes 9 11.34 \o 0 

3/24/ 2009 0.00 Yes 9 6.71 No 1 

3/ 25/ 20095 0.00 Yes 9 -6.06 \o 3 

3/ 26/ 2009 0.00 Yes 9 11.47 \o 0 

3/ 27/ 2009 0.00 Yes 9 2.80 Yes 8 

3/ 28/ 2009 0.33 Yes 9 2.14 Yes 8 

3/ 29/ 2009 2.37 Yes 9 -2.60 Yes 9 

• Zero Drift Met on all Days - indicating little loss ofHg 

• Difficulty Meeting Upscale - Problems with HovaCaJTM 

Cooper Environmental Services 16 

VES011282 
Field HgCI2 Linearity (System Integrity 

Check) 

Concentration 

lJ 

1S 

~ 

14 

~ 1l 

.., 

"';) 

..!. 10 

~ 

cS s ... 

:z: 

3 c 

• 

l 

:) 

I 

·1 1 ~ 

Nominal Pass I Pass . #of Sample AVE % Error 

Conc.entrat1011 . . r , CAMR Current 

4 6 s 10 

•; = 1 .0465x- 0.0415 

R1 = 0 991S 

11 tJ 

HovaCal He Cont. (ui/dS<m) 

Cooper Environmental Services 

16 1S 10 

PS12A 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

Yes 

J 7 

VES011283 
Field Hg0 Linearity 

• .. c • . _ · · rss t . . . · · ren 

I "1 12A 1S 

16 

14 

-e 1: "' 

~ ! 10 

¥ 

.s s .. 

% 

~ 6 

Prdble 

' 

v = 0.956lll· 0.613S 

R:' = 0 .9914 

ovaCal Conversion of 

HgCI2 tlJ¥r;JHU. D~"dl4'>v ,t.. J' L,.uvv, • vi,'IP'? 111 • 

20 Co 4 6 s 10 12 14 16 lS 

Holll!Cal He Cone. (ug/dS<ml 

Cooper Environmental Services 

es 

0 

es 

\0 

18 

VES011284 
Why we think there was a problem 

with HovaCalTM 

• Visible Rust in Tubing Exiting HovaCalTM 

• Problems Maintaining Heating - he~ would frequently 

fail requiring the HovaCalTM to cool do nd restart 

• Were Using HovaCalTM at the Very High Enq of 

Recommended Emission Range 

Cooper Environmental Services 19 

VES011285 
Thermo Hg Freedom Comparison 

Ave % 

Date(s) X act Thermo Difference 

3/ 20/ 2009 8.91 8.49 4.87 

3/ 21/ 2009 7.12 8.25 -13.52 . 

3/22/2009 6.94 7.96 -12.54 ~ 

3/ 23/ 2009 7.16 7.76 -7.13 

3/ 24/ 2009 7.28 7.39 -1.53 

3/ 25/ 2009 7.97 7.14 11.63 

3/ 26/ 2009 7.55 7.30 3.44 

3/ 27/ 2009 6.88 6.65 4.00 

3i 28/ 2009 6.83 6.54 4.91 

3/ 29/ 2009 6.90 7.65 -10.67 

3/ 30/ 2009 7.83 8.89 -12.07 

3/ 31/ 2009 8. 36 8.58 -2...4.6 

All Days 7.42 7.78 4.09 ..) 

Cooper Environmental Services 20 

VESOII286 
RATA Results 

10 

9 

-

E 8 

1.1 

Ill 

"a 7 

"DD 

JL 6 Mlb' 

v .... cJ 

c: 5 

0 

u 4 > 

~ 

s • CES Xact 

0 Method 308 

:l 

1.1 3 ~ 

~ 

~ 2 

ThermoCMM 

1 

0 

0 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 

RATA Number 

Cooper Environmental Services 21 

VES011287 
Conclusions 

• CES Xact Can Accurately Measure Mercury in a Coal 

Fired Power Plant 

• If the XactTM had recalibrated to the 

generator (HovaCalTM) as most Hg CE 

would likely have failed the RATA 

cury 

do - it 

• It is feasible to use the Xact to Measure Mercury on a 

Coal Fired Power Plant 

- Need a Mercury Generator Designed to Operate on XactTM 

Flows 

Cooper Environmental Services 22 

VES011288 
Differences Between XactTM and AF 

Based Mercury Monitors 

• XactTM Requires Longer Sampling Times (15 minutes 

versus 1 to 2 minutes) 

• XRF Calibrations are very stable ( 1 yea 

needs to be recalibrated frequently 

• XactTM is less dependant on the accuracy oftheHg 

generator 

• Since XRF is Non Destructive Samples Can be Archived 

and Potentially Reanalyzed if Data needs to be validated 

• XactTM could be used to monitor for other metals 

- PM is a smTogate for HAP Metals , 

- If EPA requires PM CEMS on CFPP Xact could potentially be 

used for Hg and HAP metals 

- Th~refore 1 CEMS (multi-metals including Hg) instead of 2 Hg 

CEMS and PM CEMS 

Cooper Environmental Services 23 

VESOII289 
UESTIO 

Krag Petterson 

kragp(a"Jcoopercnvironmental.com 

Cooper Environmental Services 

S? 

24 

VES011290 
VES011291 .pdf 
rf.iiif.il 

US 

~ Army Corps 

of Engineers., 

Engineer Research and 

Development Center 

X-Ray Fluorescence-Based Multi-Metal 

Continuous Emission Monitor 

Technology Demonstration 

K. James Hay, Veera M. Boddu, March 2005 

Bruce E. Johnsen, and John A. Cooper 

CES 

• • 

ApprOYI!KI fQc pl.blk: retoa.co; dktribubOI\ k un!l~. 

VESOI 1291 
ERDC/CERL TR-05-9 

March 2005 

X-Ray Fluorescence Based Multi-Metal Continuous 

Emission Monitor: Technology Demonstration 

K. James Hay and Veera M. Boddu 

Construction Engineering Research Laboratory 

POBox9005 

Champaign, IL 61826-9005 

Bruce E. Johnsen and John A. Cooper 

Cooper Environmental SeNices 

10170 SW Nimbus Avenue, Suite H5 

Porlland, OR 97223-4340 

Final Report 

Approved for pubic release; dlstr1buUoo Is unhm~ed. 

Prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 

Washington, DC 20314-1000 

Under Work Unit #CNE-6091 

VES011292 
ABSTRACT: Anny demilitarizntion incinCtlllorS will need to comply with the Hazardocs Wo.ste Combustor National Emission Standard ft)r t-lazardou." Air Pnllutantll that will regulate metal" and metal comround~ listed under 

the Clean Air Act Amendmenrs. A l1u>ge problem ror tha;c incinerator operalions is limited knowlcdKe or 1he type 

and quantity of e1nitted metals. so thor compliance 1nay be determined only through trial bum emission teSts. A continuous emission 11onitor tCEM) for muhi.JncUtls will provide the emission data, a tool 10 help meet complianctrcquiremenfs, and the opporruni1y to adjwl burn strategies for increased production. A •scr-friendly ntulti-metal 

CEM that uses x-my fluorciiCCncc (XRF) as the analytical method and an automated •amp ling sy.tconthaf provide< 

t"xlnH:Iivl!: ~tch s~m line t\nln " filter llll"c (XCEM) wa\ demoru.trated at the J 236 Dcaccivation Fum .. <tce at Toc.x:le 

Anny Depo~ Utab. The uoit was compar•'<l•o EPA Reference Method 29 during two separnte tests (2001 and 2002). 

The second test wJ.s pcrfonned aflcr improvements wen:: made to the sample trtl.t\SpOrt and system caUbratjons. The 

results iodicaae that the XCEM has met the proposed Perfonnance Specification 10 for roolri·mctal <:EMs excepl for 

relative acwracy <CQUiremencs f<>< 4 of 9 metals. II$ failures a.re attnbuted mostly to inadcqullCics io the reference 

method. The n101itor is proving useful 11 Tooele and is ready for implementation at och~ Anny den.tnirarization 

incinerators. 

DISCLAIMER: The cootmu of1h1s l'qlOrt an: no110 be ustd f01 adn~nising. publiCJ.tiOI\ or pnmcxional purposes. 

Citation of l13de names docs not eonstitutca:n official eodor1tment or approval M tbe use or aucb commcrcW produec:s. 

All product nana and trademarks eittd are lbc property of their respective owners.. The findin.pof thit n:pot\ :are not to be 

construed as ao llftitlsl Depactnk'nl of I he Army posi•ioo unless so designated by other aucborized dutumencs. DESTROY THIS REPORT WHEN IT IS NO LONGER NEEDED. DO NOT RE1'URN IT fO TilE ORIGINATOR. 

VESOII 293 
ERDC/CERL TR-l)S.!I ii 

Contents 

List of Figures and Tables .............................................................. ,_,._ ............. - ........................ v 

Conversim Factors ....................... - ..................................... _ .......................... - ......................... vii 

Preface .. - - --··-.. -···- · .. - ..................... - ..... - ............. - ............. - ..... - ........... - ....... - ........ - vii 

lntrod>Jction .......................... _ ................................ _ ........ _ ................ _ .. _ ....................... - ... 1 

Background ......................................................................................................................... 1 

Objeclille ...................................................................................................... ....................... J 

Approach ............................................................................................................................ 4 

Mode of Technology Transfer ............................................................................................. 4 

2 Field Testing 2001 _ ................ _ .. _ ........................... _ ............................................................. 5 

Brief Description of XCEM .................................................................................................. 5 

Ext~>clion Systom ......................................................................................................................... 5 

San:!>/ing ond Analysis System ..................................................................................................... 6 

Convol $YSiem.......................... .. ............................................................................................... 7 

Exec:~Alon of Field-Testing Activities ................................................................................... 7 

Test Plan ........................................................................................................................................ 8 

EPA Verifi<;aficn ............. ..... _ .............................. _ .................................................................. 9 

TEAD lr!lotface ............................................................................................................................. 9 

Test Objeclives ............................................................................................................................ 10 

Site Description ........................................................................................................................... 11 

Exporimontal Design ................................................................................................................... 14 

Resuts ............................................................................................................................. 15 

XCEM Reported Conc<tntmtlons ................................................................................................. 15 

Sarr.p/Jng and ReSPQnSO Tlfllll .................................................................................................... 19 

Zero and Calibration Drfll. .................................................................................. ......................... 19 

Correlation with Releronoo Molhod ........................................................................................... 20 

Res;>MSe to Change•ln Molal Conc:entratlotl .......................................................................... 25 

Rei21Ne.Acwracy ...................................................................................................................... 25 

Predsion ............................. - ..................................................................................................... 33 

Lo...u..el Molal ReSP<J(I$0 ............................................................................................... - ..... 35 

Bias ............................................................................................................................................ 36 

Summary .......................................................................................................................... 37 

VES011294 
tv ERDC/CERL TR-45-9 

3 Transport and Calibration Improvements ......... _,_,,_,, ........... _ ............... ,_ , .................... 39 

Transport Line Changes .................................................................................................. 39 

Recaibralion .................................................................................................................... 40 

Summary of Transport and Calibration Evaluations ......................................................... 40 

4 M29 Comparison Testing of XCEM 2002 ...................... - ..................................................... 42 

ResUII$ ............................................................................................................................... 42 

Mellx>d 29 Conoontmllons ................................................................................. ........................ 42 

Prer:icled Slack Gas Concenlt&lloM ................................................................ ........................ 43 

XCEM Concent1lllions .............................................................................................................. 47 

XCEM Calibration Evaluation Us<ng A OuanX - XRF and ICP/MS .................................. 53 

Precision .......................................................................................................................... 53 

Discussion .............................. ........................................................................................ 54 

Regulated Elements Typ/c81/'y Found in the FeedStleam .................................................... ........ 54 

Regulated Elemonrs Not Typicolly Found in TEAD Emissions. ................................................... 58 

Nonregulared MstDis ................................................................................................................. 63 

Summary ......................................................................................................................... 63 

5 XCEM Cost and Status ................................................... - ............................................ _ ...... 65 

Cost Estimates .................................................................................................................. 65 

Gaplal Costs ............................................................................................................................... 65 

Annllaf Costs .............................................................................................................................. 66 

Contiooed Use of the XCEM ............................................................................................ 66 

6 Surmwy and Conclusions .......................... - .................. - .• - ........... ,_ .. ,, .... _.,_ ... , ... _ .. 68 

References .. - ............. - ................................................ - .............................................................. 71 

Appendix A: Test/QA Plan for Verification of a Continuous Emission Monitor for 

I'AJJti.metais at Tooelo Army Depot (2001) ..................... _,_ ....................................... - ..... 73 

Appendix B: Determination of XCEM Raported Concentrations 2001 ........................... 101 

AppendixC: Transport and Calibration Evaiuations ........................................................ 106 

Appendix D: Mercury Calibration and Loss Discussion 2002 ........................................ 117 

Abbreviations and Acronyms ............................ _ .................. _ , _,,_, ... , .... _ ........... ,_, ........... 125 

Report Documentation Page ................... _ , _, .. , ... _, _ _________ , ..................... ...................... 127 

VESOII295 
EROCICERL TR-OS-9 v 

List of Figures and Tables 

Figures 

1 XCEM stilling chamber and sampling cassette ....................................................... 6 

2 XCEM chassis ......................................................................................................... 7 

3 New Component Control Screen for XCEM software interface .............................. 8 

4 XCEM housing and transport line. M29 sampling setup, stack, and ceramic 

baghouse at TEAO ................................................................................................ 10 

5 TEAO incinerator setup and sampling/spiking locations ....................................... 13 

6 Spiking at base of stack during validation testing ................................................. 15 

7 Palladium concentrations during M29 testing ....................................................... 21 

8 XCEM and M29 concentrations during TEAO verification testing ......................... 22 

9 Correlation between XCEM and M29 for elements spiked at two levels .............. 24 

10 XCEM and M29 1ead concentrations during runs 8- 11 ......................................... 28 

11 Ratio of XCEM to M29 concentrations during validation testing ........................... 30 

12 Uncorrected XCEM As concentrations versus XCEM Pb concentrations ............. 32 

13 Correlation between Sn and other APE-1236 metals with munitions buml"lg 

n nd no opiking ....................................................................................................... 46 

14 XCEM tin measurements during M29 testing ........................................................ 46 

15 XCEM versus M29 1ead fO<' validation tests .......................................................... 56 

16 Percent difference between M29 and the XCEM versus percent of Hg on 

M29 filler ................................................................................................................ 60 

17 2004 CES metals moniiO<' ..................................................................................... 67 

C1 Experimental design for atomization tests ....................................... ................... 107 

C2 XCEM reported concentrations for nonsplked elements ...................................... 113 

C3 XCEM reported concentrations and MSE-projected concentrations for 

spiked elements ................................................................................................... 114 

0 1 Comparison of XCEM x-ray spectra measured during M29 testing and 71 

days later ............................................................................................................. 121 

02 Percent difference between M29 and the XCEM vs. percent of Hg on the 

M29 filler .............................................................................................................. 123 

VES011296 
vi ERDC/CERL TR-05-9 

Tables 

1 Army hazardous waste combustors .................................................. ...................... 2 

2 Proposed P$-10 requirements ................................................................................. 3 

3 XCEM test dates and associated lEAD incineration leedstream ....... ..................... 9 

4 Typical operating parameters lor the APE-1236 deactivation furnace ................... 12 

5 TEAO metal emission limits during verifo::ation testing .......................................... 12 

6 TEAO incinerator metal emission mils and spiking levels .................................... 14 

7 Final reported CEM concentrations lor M29testing ............................................... 17 

8 UpScale and zero concentrations during validation testing .................................... 20 

9 Correlation between the XCEM and M29 ............................................................... 25 

10 XCEM measured, M29 measured, and MSE-predicted metal concentrations 

during TEAD validation testing ............................................................................... 26 

11 Relative accuracy and correlations ........................................................................ 27 

12 Percent differences between M29 sample trains ................................................... 34 

13 XCEM and M29 precision ...................................................................................... 35 

14 Method 301 bias and correction factor comparison ............................................... 37 

15 Summary of XCEM performance relative to proposed PS-10 requirements ......... 38 

16 M29 concentrations ................................................................................................ 43 

17 APE-1236 stack now rates during M29 testing ...................................................... 44 

18 APE-t 236 stack concentrations with munitions incineration but no spiking ......... .45 

19 Predicted stack concentrations based on MSE-TA spiking and background 

•stimales ................................................................................................................ 47 

20 XCEM concentrations ............................................................................................. 48 

21 Analysis of XCEM filter tape by Columbia Analytical ............................................. 53 

22 Predicted (spiked), XCEM, and M29 precision during validation testing ............... 53 

23 TEAD emission limits lor regulated elements ........................................................ 54 

24 Summary of Pb concentration data and ratios during M29 testing ........................ 55 

25 Summary of Cd concentration data and ratios during M29 testing ........................ 57 

26 Summary of Cr concentration data and ratios during M29 testing ......................... 58 

27 Summary of As concentration data and ratios during M29 testing ........................ 59 

28 Summary of Hg concentration data and ratios during M29 testing ........................ 60 

29 Summary of Sb concentration data and ratios during M29 testing ........................ 61 

30 Summary of Nl concentration data and ratios during M29 testing ......................... 62 

31 Summary of Ba concentration data during M29 testing ......................................... 62 

32 Summary of Zn concentration data and ratios during M29 testing ........................ 63 

33 Summary of 2002 M29/XCEM comparison results ................................................ 64 

VES011297 
ERDC/CERL TR-GS-9 

81 Original XCEM reported concentrations unccrrecled for calibration and dryer 

changes ................................................................................................................ 103 

82 Results of dryer tests ............................................................................................ 105 

C1 Flow rates and concentrations used to calculate atomization concentrations ..... 109 

C2 Atomizalion vs. XCEM concentrations .............................................. .................. 109 

C3 Total capture mass vs. atomization mass ............................................................ 111 

C4 Lead normalized atomiz.atlon mass vs. total capture ............................................ 111 

CS 1.1ethod 17 vs. XCEM at TEAO ............................................................................. 116 

01 Meteury reported concentrations during Year 2002 M29 validation tasting ......... 120 

02 Comparison of the location In M29 sampling trains where the Hg was 

deposited during the 2001 and 2002 tests .......................................................... 122 

Conversion Factors 

Non-Sl• units of measurement u.scd in this report can be converted to SI units as 

follow&: 

VESOI1298 
"'" ERDC/CERL TR-05-9 

Preface 

This stucy was conducted for Headquarters, Department of the Army under Pro· 

gram Element 063728A, "Environmental Technology Demonstration"; Project 

002, "Environmental Compliance Technology•; Work Unit CNE·B091, "Hazard· 

ous Air Pollutants Technology Demonstrations." The technical reviewer was 

Thomas Logan, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 

The work was petformed by the Enviromnental Process Branch (CN-E) of the 

Installations Division (CN), Construction Engineering Research Laboratory 

(CERL). The CERL Principal Investigator was Dr. K James Hay. Part of this 

work was done by Cooper Environmental Services under DACA42-02-P-0072 and 

DACA42-0l·C-0022; MSE Technology Applications, Inc. under GS-10F-02l2K; 

and the U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine. The 

technical editor was Linda L. Wheatley, Information Technology Laboratory -

Champaign. Dr. Kirankumar V. Topudurti is Chief, CN-E, and Dr. John T. 

Bandy is Chief, CN. The associated Technical Director was Gary W. Schanche. 

The Director ofCERL is Dr. Alan W. Moore. 

CERL is an element of the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development 

Center (ERDC), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Commander and Executive 

Director ~f ERDC is COL James Rowan, and the Director of ERDC is Dr. James 

R. Houston. 

VES011299