alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Artificial Life, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eberhard Schoeneburg, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Eberhard Schoeneburg

 

Eberhard Schoeneburg

Chief Executive Officer and

Principal Financial Officer

November 14, 2006

 

 

41
#### § 113.35-17 Vessels with navigating bridge control.

Each vessel with navigating bridge throttle control must have a positive mechanical stop on each telegraph transmitter that prevents movement to the “Navigating Bridge Control” position without positive action by the operator.

[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15272, Apr. 8, 1982, as amended by CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28290, June 4, 1996]
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.1834 Cargo transfer piping.

The person in charge of cargo transfer shall ensure that cargo is transferred to or from a cargo tank only through the cargo piping system.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and coll ateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 10/2/96 TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and PATRICIA ANGUS, Revenue Officer, Internal Revenue Service,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v. JOHN I. HARVEY,

Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-4062 (Dist. of Utah) (D.C. No. 95-CV-1055)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before ANDERSON , BARRETT , and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record , this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would notmaterially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral a rgument.-2-

Petitioner John I. Harvey appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss enforcement proceedings brought against himby the United States government on behalf of the Internal Revenue Servic e (“IRS”). The district court denied Mr. Harvey’s motion, finding it to be withou t merit. We affirm. In August of 1995, an IRS Revenue Officer served anIRS summons on Mr. Harvey seeking the production of data regarding Mr. Harvey’s tax liability for the years ending 1992, 1993, and 1994. Mr. Harvey fail ed to comply with the summons. Subsequently, the IRS brought a proceedin g seeking enforcement of the summons. The district court issued an Order t o Show Cause requiring Mr. Harvey to appear before a magistrate judge and show cause why he should not be compelled to obey the summons served upon him. The Order was served by leaving it at Mr. Harvey’s residence with his son. Mr. Harvey filed a motion to dismiss the proceedings on the grounds that (1) the Order had not been served upon him personally, and (2) the court lacked juris diction over him because he was not a federal citizen and had not committed an act on federal property. The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation denying Mr. Harvey’s motion. The magistrate judge found that s ervice of the Order to Show Cause was proper because the Order was served at Mr . Harvey’s residence upon a person of suitable age and discretion, and Mr. Harv ey had actual notice of the order. **See** Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(2). He also found that the c ourt had jurisdiction-3-

to hear the matter pursuant to its general jurisdic tion over federal tax matters. The district court adopted the magistrate judge’s R eport and Recommendation. After reviewing the briefs of the parties, the reco rd on appeal, and the relevant law, we conclude that petitioner’s argumen ts are without merit. Therefore, the order of the United States District Court for the District of Utah is hereby AFFIRMED for substantially the reasons set out in the magis trate judge’s Report and Recommendation, filed on February 1, 199 6, and the district court’s Order, filed March 8, 1996. ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Michael R. Murphy Circuit Judge
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT 

OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

R.G. & G.R. HARRIS FUNERAL 

HOMES INC., 

 Defendant. 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 

2:14-CV-13710 

Hon. Sean F. Cox 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Please be advised that Joseph P. Infranco hereby enters his appearance as cocounsel in the above-entitled cause of action on behalf of Defendant, R.G. & G.R. 

Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ Joseph P. Infranco 

Joseph P. Infranco (NY Bar 1268739) 

ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM 

15100 N. 90th Street 

Scottsdale, AZ 85260 

(480) 444-0020/ 

(480) 444-0028 Fax 

jinfranco@alliancedefendingfreedom.org

Attorney for Defendant R.G. & G.R. 

Harris Funeral Homes, Inc.

 

Case 2:14-cv-13710-SFC-DRG ECF No. 16 filed 05/06/15 PageID.206 Page 1 of 2
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A copy of the foregoing was filed electronically on this 6th day of May, 

2015. Notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court’s 

electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court’s system. 

 /s/ Joseph P. Infranco 

Joseph P. Infranco (NY Bar 1268739) 

Case 2:14-cv-13710-SFC-DRG ECF No. 16 filed 05/06/15 PageID.207 Page 2 of 2
(logo)KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


          1600 Market Street
          Philadelphia, PA 19103-7212



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT



The Board of Directors
PHH US Mortgage Corporation

We have audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing  standards,  the
consolidated   financial    statements   of   PHH   US   Mortgage    Corporation
(a wholly-owned  subsidiary of PHH Holdings Corporation)  and subsidiaries as of
and for  the year ended April 30, 1995 and have issued our report  thereon dated
June 12, 1995.

Our audit  referred to above  included tests relating to mortgage loans serviced
for others in  accordance  with the  requirements  of the UNIFORM   SINGLE AUDIT
PROGRAM  FOR MORTGAGE  BANKERS.  Our audit  disclosed no exceptions or errors in
records  relating to mortgage  loans  serviced for others that,  in our opinion,
paragraph 4 of the UNIFORM  SINGLE AUDIT PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE  BANKERS  requires
us to report.

The Company is covered under  Fidelity Bond and Errors  and Omissions  insurance
policies.  The amounts of such    coverages  are  $20,000,000  and  $20,000,000,
respectively.

We are  independent  Certified  Public  Accountants  with respect to the Company
within the meaning of the Code of Professional  Ethics of the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.

This  report  is  intended  solely  for the use of the  Board of  Directors  and
management  of the Company and  investors  in the  mortgage  loans  serviced for
others    by   the   Company   and   should   not be used for any other purpose.


/s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


June 12, 1995
#### § 618.120 Transfers of property.

If a recipient sells or otherwise transfers property financed in whole or in part with Federal financial assistance to a transferee that operates any education program or activity, and the Federal share of the fair market value of the property is not upon such sale or transfer properly accounted for to the Federal Government, both the transferor and the transferee shall be deemed to be recipients, subject to the provisions of §§ 618.205 through 618.235(a).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, Criminal Case No. 14-CR-20589 

vs. HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN 

D1 - SOPHIA EGGLESTON, 

 

 Defendant. 

______________________________/ 

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S 

SEVEN MOST RECENT MOTIONS AND PETITIONS 

AND SETTING TRIAL DATE 

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s seven most recent motions and 

petitions: the motion to “fire lawyer” [docket entry 120]; motion to stop commitment to the Bureau 

of Prisons [docket entry 122]; motion “to strike Dr. Lemon[’s] report down and proceed to trial” 

[docket entry 123]; motion entitled, “Rule 12 Pleadings and PreTrial Motions Rule 12(b)(3) and 

12(b)(4) Plea in Demurrer” [docket entry 127]; petition for an ethics investigation into defendant’s 

former attorney [docket entry 128]; and duplicates of docket entries 127 and 128 [docket entries 

129 and 130]. Pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(f)(2), the Court shall decide these motions without 

a hearing. 

The Court—having reviewed the docket, motions, petitions, and applicable law—

holds that all of these motions and petitions are meritless. Defendant fails to present cognizable 

issues. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that the seven motions and petitions listed above are denied. 
2 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case shall proceed to trial on April 17, 2018, 

at 9:00 a.m. 

Dated: February 28, 2018 s/Bernard A. Friedman 

 Detroit, Michigan BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and 

any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class 

U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on February 28, 2018. 

 s/Johnetta M. Curry-Williams 

 Case Manager
§ 129.356 Battery installations. ( a ) *Large.* Each large battery-installation must be located in a locker, room, or enclosed box dedicated solely to the storage of batteries. Ventilation must be provided in accordance with § 111.15-10 of this chapter. Electrical equipment located within the battery enclosure must be approved by an independent laboratory for hazardous locations of Class I, Division 1, Group B, and must meet subpart 111.105 of this chapter.
( b ) *Small.* Each small battery-installation must be located in a well-ventilated space and protected from falling objects. No small battery-installation may be in a closet, storeroom, or similar space.
#### William R. Travers, *Respondent, v.*John McB. Davidson, *Appellant*.

Reargument ordered upon printed briefs to be presented within twenty days after notice of the decision.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2166 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to provide universal service 

support to head start programs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2009 

Mr. CUELLAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to provide universal service support to head start programs, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. UNIVERSAL SERVICE SUPPORT FOR HEAD 

4 START PROGRAMS. 

5 Section 254(h)(7)(A) of the Communications Act of 

6 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254(h)(7)(A)) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘SCHOOLS.—The term’’ and in8 serting the following: 

9 ‘‘SCHOOLS.— 

10 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The term’’; and 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2166 IH

1 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(ii) HEAD STARTS INCLUDED.—The 

3 terms ‘elementary and secondary schools’, 

4 ‘elementary or secondary school’, ‘elemen5 tary schools’, and ‘school’ shall include any 

6 local public or private nonprofit agency 

7 that is designated by the Secretary of 

8 Health and Human Services as a Head 

9 Start agency under section 641 of the 

10 Head Start Act (42 U.S.C. 9836).’’. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

JILL CARUSO, Individually,

Plaintiff,

v.

DARDEN RESTAURANTS

A Foreign Company

Defendant.

_______________________________________/

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 2:14-cv-13793

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their undersigned counsel and respective parties, 

and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), stipulate to the voluntary 

dismissal with prejudice of the above-captioned matter, as well as and any and all claims against 

Darden Restaurants, First Concorde Properties, LLC, and GMRI, Inc., with all parties to bear 

their own respective costs and attorney fees.

Dated: March 25, 2015

FOR THE PLAINTIFF FOR THE DEFENDANT

By: _/s/ Pete M. Monismith___ By: _/s/ Mary A. Kalmink

Pete M. Monismith, Esq.

Pete M. Monismith, P.C.

3945 Forbes Ave., #175

Pittsburgh, PA 15213

ph. (724) 610-1881

pete@monismithlaw.com

Mary A. Kalmink

Clark Hill, PLC

500 Woodward Ave | Suite 3500 

Detroit, Michigan 48226

313.965.8263 (direct) 

313.309.6863 (fax)

mkalmink@clarkhill.com

1

2:14-cv-13793-GER-MKM Doc # 15 Filed 03/26/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 39
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

JILL CARUSO, Individually,

Plaintiff,

v.

DARDEN RESTAURANTS

A Foreign Company

Defendant.

_______________________________________/

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Case No. 2:14-cv-13793

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the Stipulation of Dismissal, and the Court having 

reviewed the pleadings and papers submitted to it and being otherwise fully advised in the 

premises, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:

1) The above-styled cause be and the same is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice;

2) All claims Plaintiff may have had against First Concorde Properties, LLC, GMRI Inc. 

and Darden Restaurants, are dismissed with prejudice; 

3) The parties bear their own respective attorneys’ fees and costs; and

4) To the extent not otherwise disposed herein, all pending motions are hereby denied or 

moot and the case is closed.

DONE and ORDERED, this 26th day of March, 2015.

s/Gerald E. Rosen

 Honorable Gerald E. Rosen

2:14-cv-13793-GER-MKM Doc # 15 Filed 03/26/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 40
----

| (1)    | the      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended      December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)    | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.                                                                                                                   |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |

| Dated:      February 23, 2010 | /s/  Joseph L.      Sullivan |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                          | Joseph      L. Sullivan                |
|                          | President      and General Manager     |
|                          | (principal      executive officer)     |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2203 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2203

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
              telephone and other communications services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2009

Mr. Connolly of Virginia (for himself and Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
              telephone and other communications services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Telephone Excise Tax Repeal Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXCISE TAX ON TELEPHONE AND OTHER COMMUNICATIONS 
              SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 33 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to facilities and services) is amended by striking subchapter 
B.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 4293 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
        amended by striking ``chapter 32 (other than the taxes imposed 
        by sections 4064 and 4121) and subchapter B of chapter 33,'' 
        and inserting ``and chapter 32 (other than the taxes imposed by 
        sections 4064 and 4121),''.
            (2)(A) Paragraph (1) of section 6302(e) of such Code is 
        amended by striking ``section 4251 or''.
            (B) Paragraph (2) of section 6302(e) of such Code is 
        amended--
                    (i) by striking ``imposed by--'' and all that 
                follows through ``with respect to'' and inserting 
                ``imposed by section 4261 or 4271 with respect to'', 
                and
                    (ii) by striking ``bills rendered or''.
            (C) The subsection heading for section 6302(e) of such Code 
        is amended by striking ``Communications Services and''.
            (3) Section 6415 of such Code is amended by striking 
        ``4251, 4261, or 4271'' each place it appears and inserting 
        ``4261 or 4271''.
            (4) Paragraph (2) of section 7871(a) of such Code is 
        amended by inserting ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (B), by 
        striking subparagraph (C), and by redesignating subparagraph 
        (D) as subparagraph (C).
            (5) The table of subchapters for chapter 33 of such Code is 
        amended by striking the item relating to subchapter B.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts paid pursuant to bills first rendered more than 90 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001005841
<NAME> SDC INTERNATIONAL INC
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                          80,932
<SECURITIES>                                    62,985
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     31,310
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,584
<PP&E>                                       4,653,407
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,835,218
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          194,480
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,198
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,638,540
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,835,218
<SALES>                                         45,456
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,456
<CGS>                                           36,142
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               869,471
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (860,157)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (860,157)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Senate Floor Activity - Thursday, July 10, 2014

**

----

## The Journal

## Certain Procedures Dispensed With

## Transaction of Morning Business

## Legislative Business (Thursday, July 10)

H.R. 1376

H.R. 1813

S. 653

 S.Amdt. 3556

S. 1104

S. 2056

S. 2057

S. 2244

S. 2363

 220

 S.Amdt. 3469

 S.Amdt. 3490

 S.Amdt. 3491

 S.Amdt. 3492

 S.Amdt. 3493

S.Res. 412

 S.Amdt. 3553

 S.Amdt. 3554

 S.Amdt. 3555

## Executive Business (Thursday, July 10)

PN1126

PN1647

PN1737

 221

## Adjournment

        -  Bills, Acts, & Laws 
        -  Nominations 
        -  Treaties 
        -  Votes 
        -  Floor Proceedings 
        -  Rules & Procedure 
        -  Landmark Legislation 
        -  Sessions of Congress 
        -  Senate Archives 
        -  Public Disclosure 

### Floor Activity Summaries 

View previous floor activity files.Stream live Senate floor proceedings while a meeting is in progress.View past floor proceedings on CSPAN

### Additional Information 

Use this site's search or visit the Senate Index to find pages by topic.

To learn about the history of the Senate visit the About the Senate section of Senate.gov.

### Contact Your Senators 

Follow this guide on how to contact your senators by phone, postal mail, or on the web.