alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
21st Century
Holding Company





EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-


OXLEY
ACT





In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of 21st Century
Holding Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Michael H. Braun, Chief Executive
Officer of 21st Century
Holding Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 21st
      Century Holding Company.





By:/s/ Michael H.
      BraunMichael
      H. Braun, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
      Officer)
              August
      16, 2010
# C_2009228EN.01014801.xml

| 22.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/148 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/148

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 on common rules for the allocation of slots at Community airports

COM(2009) 121 final — 2009/0042 (COD)

2009/C 228/27

On 19 March 2009 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Articles 156 and 175 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the

‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 on common rules for the allocation of slots at Community airports’

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 452nd plenary session of 24 and 25 March 2009 (meeting of 24 March 2009), by 140 votes to 8 with 14 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

nd

Brussels, 24 March 2009.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Mario SEPI

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                             FORTE SOFTWARE, INC.
                 COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                         ------------------------
                                                       1996         1997        1998
                                                       ----         ----        ----
<S>                                                 <C>           <C>       <C>
Denominator:
Denominator for basic net income (loss) per
  share--weighted average common
  shares outstanding...............................   4,874       18,458      19,334
Effect of dilutive securities-
Stock options and warrants(1)......................    -           2,652        -
                                                      -----       ------      ------
Denominator for diluted earnings per share.........   4,874       21,110      19,334


Net income (loss).................................. $(1,988)      $7,249    $(14,177)
                                                    --------      ------    ---------

Net income (loss) per share--basic.................   $(0.41)       $0.39      $(0.73)
                                                     -------       -----      -------

Net income (loss) per share--diluted...............   $(0.41)       $0.34      $(0.73)
                                                     -------       -----      -------
</TABLE>

(1)  Excluded as anti-dilutive in loss periods.
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS**

 

We The firm of W.D. VonGonten & Co. consents to the use of its name and to the use of itsreport regarding Evolution Petroleum Corporation Proved Reserves and Future NetRevenues “as of July 1, 2005 through July 1, 2009” in the relevant pages ofthe Form 10-K of Evolution Petroleum Corporation for the fiscal year endedJune 30, 2009.

 

W.D. Von Gonten &Co. has no interests in Evolution Petroleum Corporation or in any affiliatedcompanies or subsidiaries and has not received any such interest as payment forsuch reports and has no director, officer or employee otherwise connected withEvolution Petroleum Corporation. Evolution Petroleum Corporation does not employ us on a contingentbasis.

 

Yours truly,

 

 
| /s/ William D. Von  Gonten, Jr. |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
| W.D. VON  GONTEN & CO.      |   |
|                                 |   |
| By: William D. Von  Gonten, Jr. |   |
| TX #73244                            |   |
| Its: President                       |   |
|                                 |   |
|                                 |   |
| September 21, 2009              |   |

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 153

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 153.232 Type III system.

A type III containment system must be in either a type I, II, or III hull. The requirements for type I, II, and III hulls are in subpart F of part 172 of this chapter.

[CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51009, Nov. 4, 1983]
# C_2012006EN.01000701.xml

| 7.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/7

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 17 October 2011 — SIA Mednis v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

(Case C-525/11)

2012/C 6/08

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Referring court

Augstākās tiesas Senāts

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SIA Mednis

Applicant:

Defendant: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does Article 183 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax give a Member State the right, without carrying out any specific analysis and solely on the basis of an arithmetical calculation, not to refund that part of the excess tax that is over 18 % (the standard rate of VAT) of the total value of the taxable transactions carried out in the corresponding monthly tax periods until the State tax authority has received the annual return of the person subject to value added tax?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p 1.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.017-27 Production tests and examination. ( a ) *General.* Each ladder manufactured under Coast Guard approval must be tested in accordance with this section and subpart 159.007 of this chapter. Steps that fail testing may not be marked with the Coast Guard approval number and each assembled ladder that fails testing may not be sold as Coast Guard approved.
( b ) *Test #1: Steps.* Steps must be separated into lots of 100 steps or less. One step from each lot must be selected at random and tested as described in § 106.017-21(c)(1), except that the step may be supported at the points where it would be attached to suspension members in an assembled ladder. If the step fails the test, ten more steps must be selected at random from the lot and tested. If one or more of the ten steps fails the test, each step in the lot must be tested.
( c ) *Test #2: Ladders.* Assembled ladders must be separated into lots of 20 ladders or less One ladder must be selected at random from the ladders in the lot. The ladder selected must be at least 3 m (10 ft.) long or, if each ladder in the lot is less than 3 m long, a ladder of the longest length in the lot must be selected. The ladder must be tested as prescribed in § 160.017-21(c)(2), except that only a 3 m section of the ladder need be subjected to the static load. If the ladder fails the test each other ladder in the lot must be tested.
( d ) *Independent laboratory.* Each production test must be conducted or supervised by an independent laboratory. However, if a test is performed more than 4 different times per year, laboratory participation is required only 4 times per year. If the laboratory does not participate in all tests, the times of laboratory participation must be as selected by the laboratory. The times selected must provide for effective monitoring throughout the production schedule.
( e ) *Visual examination.* The visual examination described in § 160.017-21(b) must be conducted as a part of each production test.
§ 131.960 Use of auto-pilot. When the automatic pilot is used in areas of high traffic density, conditions of restricted visibility, or any other hazardous navigational situations, the master shall ensure that— ( a ) It is possible to immediately establish manual control of the vessel's steering;
( b ) A competent person is ready at all times to take over steering control; and
( c ) The changeover from automatic to manual control of the vessel's steering and the reverse is made by, or under the supervision of, the master or officer of the watch.
#### Carl John Jonsson, Respondent, *v.*Nelson Thompson, *Appel*lant.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Hardin, J.
### NUM BER 13-0 9-00 379- CR 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ BR A ND ON M A

TTM CR EYN OLD S, A pp ellan t,

v . TH E STA

TE OF T EXAS, A pp ellee.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ On ap pe al f rom th e C ou nty C ou rt atL awN o. 2 of Vict oria Co un ty , T exas .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ 

### MEM ORA NDU M OPI NI ON B efo re J u st ic es Ya ñ ez , R o d rig u ez , a n d G arza M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam Appel lan t, Brandon M att Mc Rey nol ds, w as conv icted o f dri v ing w hil e i ntox ic ated. On J une 20, 2008, appel lan t fil ed a noti ce of appeal by a n d t h ro ug h hi s a ttor ney . On Febr uar y 11, 2010, thi s Cou rt abated the appeal becau se no appel lat e br ief had bee n fil ed, ordered the tri al cour

t to determi ne w hether

appell ant desi re d to prosec ute t his appeal and instructe d the trial court to ma ke f indings as to whethe r the ap pellan t had aba ndo ned his app eal.2

Base d on the t ri al cour

t heari ng , the tri al cour

t judg e reco mmends t hat t he appe al be dis mis sed. The tr ial co urt found t hat a ppel lan t i s n ot represent ed by co unsel , doe s n ot w antapp ointe d cou nsel an d do es no t w antto pursu e his app eal. Al thoug h no w ri tten moti on has b e e n f ile d i n c ompli ance w it h R ule 42.2 (a ) of the Tex as Rul es of A ppel lat e Procedu re , based upon the a ppel lan t’ s t est imony at the h ear ing that he does not want t o c onti nue hi s a ppeal , we c oncl ude t hat g ood c ause ex is ts to sus pend the operat ion of Rule 42.2 (a ) in thi s c ase. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P
. 2
. A c c o rd in gl y, w e dism iss the ap pea l.
PERC UR IAM Do not p ubl is h. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 4 7.2( b)
. Del iv ered and filed the 25th day of Ma rc h, 20 10.
Editorial Note on Part 161
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 161 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49238, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 161.012-1 Scope. ( a ) This subpart prescribes construction and performance requirements, approval and production tests, and procedures for approving personal flotation device lights fitted on Coast Guard approved life preservers,buoyant vests, and other personal flotation devices.
( b ) [Reserved]
[CGD 76-028, 44 FR 38785, July 2, 1979, as amended at 79 FR 58286, Sept. 29, 2014]
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.420 Tank design. ( a ) The structure of an integral tank must meet the deep tank scantling standards of the American Bureau of Shipping published in “Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels”, 1981.
( b ) The structure of an integral tank must be designed and shown by calculation to withstand the internal pressure determined under § 154.407.
[CGD 74-289, 44 FR 26009, May 3, 1979, as amended by CGD 77-069, 52 FR 31630, Aug. 21, 1987]
#### Mary Moriarty, Respondent, *v.*The City of New York, Appellant.

*Moriartyv. City of Sew Torh,*132 App. Div. 10, affirmed.

(Argued December 15, 1909;

decided January *4,*1910.)

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 24,1909, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through defendant’s negligence.

*Francis K.*Pendleton, *Corporation Counsel (James D. Bell*of counsel), for appellant.

*A. L. Pincoffs*and *Edward P. O'Brien*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Yann, Willard Bartlett, Hisoook and Chase, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         411,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,911,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,267,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    21,000
<INVENTORY>                                    536,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,224,000
<PP&E>                                       1,463,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 390,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,441,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,761,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,131,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,441,000
<SALES>                                      5,694,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,694,000
<CGS>                                        3,359,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,718,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (44,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,381,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,381,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,381,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.47)
        

</TABLE>
§ 15.720 Use of non-U.S.-credentialed personnel. ( a ) United States vessels which need to replace one or more persons while on a foreign voyage and outside the jurisdiction of the United States, in order to meet manning requirements, may use non-U.S. credentialed personnel without a TWIC, except for the positions of master and radio officer, until the vessel returns to a port at which in the most expeditious manner replacements who are citizens of the United States can be obtained.
( b ) The citizenship requirements of 46 U.S.C. 8103(a) and (b) and the TWIC requirement of 46 U.S.C. 70105 are waived, except for the requirement that the master must be a U.S. citizen holding a TWIC, with respect to the following vessels: ( 1 ) A U.S.-documented offshore supply vessel (OSV) (as that term is defined in 46 U.S.C. 2101(19)) that is operating from a foreign port; and
( 2 ) A U.S.-documented mobile offshore drilling unit (MODU) (as that term is defined in 46 U.S.C. 2101(15a)) that is operating beyond the water above the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf.
( c ) The waiver provided in paragraph (b) of this section does not apply to any vessel operating in water above the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf (as that term is defined in 43 U.S.C. 1331(a)).
( d ) The master must assure that any replacements of crewmembers by non-U.S. citizens made in accordance with this section will be with an individual who holds a credential that required experience, training, and other qualifications equivalent to the U.S. credential required for the position and that the person possesses or will possess the training required to communicate to the extent required by § 15.730 of this part.
( e ) Non-U.S.-credentialed officers serving onboard vessels subject to STCW must hold a “Certificate attesting recognition” in accordance with part 11, subpart J of this subchapter. A mariner may serve for a period not to exceed 3 months onboard the vessel while the Coast Guard is processing his or her application for such a certificate.
[CGD 89-061, 55 FR 1212, Jan. 12, 1990, as amended by USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11261, Mar. 16, 2009; USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 78005, Dec. 24, 2013]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

ANITA WISE WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO: 14-CV-13944-DT

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant.

 /

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order Adopting the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and affirming the

Commissioner’s decision entered this date,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be, and hereby is

GRANTED in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Dated: June 30, 2016 S/Lisa G. Wagner 

LISA G. WAGNER, CASE MANAGER AND

DEPUTY CLERK TO THE HONORABLE

ROBERT H. CLELEND 

2:14-cv-13944-RHC-DRG Doc # 24 Filed 06/30/16 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 583
Case 2:14-cr-20614-NGE-MKM ECF No. 5, PageID.10 Filed 10/16/14 Page 1 of 23
Case 2:14-cr-20614-NGE-MKM ECF No. 5, PageID.11 Filed 10/16/14 Page 2 of 23
Case 2:14-cr-20614-NGE-MKM ECF No. 5, PageID.12 Filed 10/16/14 Page 3 of 23
Case 2:14-cr-20614-NGE-MKM ECF No. 5, PageID.13 Filed 10/16/14 Page 4 of 23
Case 2:14-cr-20614-NGE-MKM ECF No. 5, PageID.14 Filed 10/16/14 Page 5 of 23
Case 2:14-cr-20614-NGE-MKM ECF No. 5, PageID.15 Filed 10/16/14 Page 6 of 23
Case 2:14-cr-20614-NGE-MKM ECF No. 5, PageID.16 Filed 10/16/14 Page 7 of 23
Case 2:14-cr-20614-NGE-MKM ECF No. 5, PageID.17 Filed 10/16/14 Page 8 of 23
Case 2:14-cr-20614-NGE-MKM ECF No. 5, PageID.18 Filed 10/16/14 Page 9 of 23
Case 2:14-cr-20614-NGE-MKM ECF No. 5, PageID.19 Filed 10/16/14 Page 10 of 23
Case 2:14-cr-20614-NGE-MKM ECF No. 5, PageID.20 Filed 10/16/14 Page 11 of 23
Case 2:14-cr-20614-NGE-MKM ECF No. 5, PageID.21 Filed 10/16/14 Page 12 of 23
Case 2:14-cr-20614-NGE-MKM ECF No. 5, PageID.22 Filed 10/16/14 Page 13 of 23
Case 2:14-cr-20614-NGE-MKM ECF No. 5, PageID.23 Filed 10/16/14 Page 14 of 23
Case 2:14-cr-20614-NGE-MKM ECF No. 5, PageID.24 Filed 10/16/14 Page 15 of 23
Case 2:14-cr-20614-NGE-MKM ECF No. 5, PageID.25 Filed 10/16/14 Page 16 of 23
Case 2:14-cr-20614-NGE-MKM ECF No. 5, PageID.26 Filed 10/16/14 Page 17 of 23
Case 2:14-cr-20614-NGE-MKM ECF No. 5, PageID.27 Filed 10/16/14 Page 18 of 23
Case 2:14-cr-20614-NGE-MKM ECF No. 5, PageID.28 Filed 10/16/14 Page 19 of 23
Case 2:14-cr-20614-NGE-MKM ECF No. 5, PageID.29 Filed 10/16/14 Page 20 of 23
Case 2:14-cr-20614-NGE-MKM ECF No. 5, PageID.30 Filed 10/16/14 Page 21 of 23
Case 2:14-cr-20614-NGE-MKM ECF No. 5, PageID.31 Filed 10/16/14 Page 22 of 23
Case 2:14-cr-20614-NGE-MKM ECF No. 5, PageID.32 Filed 10/16/14 Page 23 of 23
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 151.03-25 Flame screen.

A fitted single screen of corrosion-resistant wire of at least 30 by 30 mesh or two fitted screens, both of corrosion-resistant wire, of at least 20 by 20 mesh spaced not less than one-half inch or more than 11⁄2 inches apart.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Robert S. Herlin, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Evolution Petroleum Corporation (the "Company"), certifies in connection with
the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report")") pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
27th day of September, 2006.


                                                     /s/ ROBERT S. HERLIN
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                         Robert S. Herlin
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2138

ROY L. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ALTERNATIVE BEHAVIORAL SERVICES,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-03-903)

Submitted: January 26, 2005 Decided: February 22, 2005

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy L. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Warren David Harless, CHRISTIAN

& BARTON, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Roy L. Williams appeals the district court order awarding

summary judgment in favor of Alternative Behavioral Services on

Williams’s claim of employment discrimination in violation of Title

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1)

(2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

thorough opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Williams v. Alternative Behavioral Servs., No. CA-03-903 (E.D. Va.

Sept. 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED