alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of First Federal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc. (the “Registrant”)on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

a)              TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

b)             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of and forthe period covered by the Report.

 

 
|   | /s/Sherri R. Billings       |   |
|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|   | Sherri R. Billings          |
|   | EVP/Chief Financial Officer |

 

Date: February 28, 2005

 

----
**EXHIBIT 23.4**

 

**LEE KEELING & ASSOCIATES, INC.**

 

PETROLEUMCONSULTANTS

 

FirstPlace Tower

15East Fifth Street, Suite 3500

Tulsa,Oklahoma 74103-4350

(918)587-5521 Telefax (918) 587-2881

 

 

September 20,2010

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS**

 

We hereby consent to the useof the name Lee Keeling & Associates, Inc. and to theincorporation by reference of our report entitled “Estimated Reserves andFuture Net Revenue Major Oil and Gas Properties Evolution Petroleum” with aneffective date of June 30, 2010, which appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Evolution Petroleum Corporation for the year ended June 30, 2010.  We further consent to the incorporation byreference of information contained in our report as of June 30, 2010, inthe Evolution PetroleumCorporationRegistrationStatementNo.333-152136onFormS-8andRegistrationStatementNo.333-168107on Form S-3.

 

 

/s/ Lee Keeling &Associates, Inc.

 

Lee Keeling &Associates, Inc.

Oklahoma RegisteredEngineering Firm CA 49 PE

Tulsa, Oklahoma

 

----
§ 147A.7 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) *Qualified person* means a person who has experience with the particular fumigant or knowledge of its properties and is familiar with fumigant detection equipment and procedures, or an applicator who is certified by the Environmental Protection Agency if his certification covers the fumigant that is used.
( b ) *Fumigant* means a substance or mixture of substances that is a gas or is rapidly or progressively transformed to the gaseous state though some nongaseous or particulate matter may remain in the space that is fumigated.
( c ) *Fumigation* means the application of a fumigant on board a vessel to a specific treatment space.
§ 11.424 Requirements for master of ocean self-propelled vessels of less than 200 GRT. ( a ) The minimum service required to qualify an applicant for an officer endorsement as master of ocean self-propelled vessels of less than 200 GRT is— ( 1 ) Three years of total service on ocean or near-coastal waters. Service on Great Lakes and inland waters may substitute for up to 18 months of the required service. Two years of the required service must have been as master, mate, or equivalent position while holding a license or MMC endorsement as master, as mate, or as operator of uninspected passenger vessels; or
( 2 ) Two years of total service as a master or mate of ocean or near-coastal towing vessels. Completion of an examination is also required.
( b ) In order to obtain an officer endorsement for sail or auxiliary sail vessels, the applicant must submit evidence of 12 months of service on sail or auxiliary sail vessels. The required 12 months of service may have been obtained prior to issuance of the master's license or MMC endorsement.
( c ) A person holding this endorsement may qualify for an STCW endorsement, according to §§ 11.315, 11.317, 11.319, and 11.321 of this part.
#### § 120.420 Navigation lights.

All vessels must have navigation lights that are in compliance with the applicable sections of the International and Inland Navigation Rules, except that a vessel of more than 19.8 meters (65 feet) in length must also have navigation lights that meet UL 1104, “Marine Navigation Lights,” or other standard specified by the Commandant.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

BRIAN A. MULLALLY, M.D., 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cv-14433 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY’S MOTION 

TO DETERMINE DAMAGES FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT ON 

COUNTERCLAIMS (ECF # 25) 

 By order entered November 17, 2015, this Court granted Counter-Plaintiff 

Standard Insurance Company’s (“Standard”) Motion for Default Judgment on its 

Counterclaim against Plaintiff Brian A. Mullally, M.D. (ECF #24.) In that order, 

the Court ruled that Standard was entitled to a default judgment on liability only. 

(Id.) Standard has now moved for a determination of the damages to be awarded 

in the default judgment (the “Damages Motion”). (ECF #25.) 

Standard seeks an award of $133,103.29, plus costs. (Id.) Standard has 

supported its motion with an affidavit from Linda Lowe, a Senior Disability Claim 

Specialist at Standard. (ECF # 25-1.) Ms. Lowe’s affidavit sets forth the basis of 

Standard’s damages claim. Her calculations are supported by documents attached 

to her affidavit. 

2:14-cv-14433-MFL-RSW Doc # 26 Filed 02/03/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 271
Dr. Mullally has not responded to the Damages Motion. 

The Court has reviewed Ms. Lowe’s affidavit and finds her unopposed 

calculation of damages to be sufficient to establish Standard’s right to the damages 

it seeks. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Damages Motion is 

GRANTED and that Standard is entitled to entry of a default judgment on its 

counterclaim in the amount of $133,103.29, plus costs. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Standard shall submit a proposed final 

default judgment on its counterclaims. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: February 3, 2016 

 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on November 13, 2015, by electronic means 

and/or ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113 

2:14-cv-14433-MFL-RSW Doc # 26 Filed 02/03/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 272
§ 138.305 TSMS certificate. ( a ) The owner or managing operator will be issued a TSMS certificate by a TPO when his or her organization is deemed in compliance with the TSMS requirements. It should be kept on file at the owner or managing operator's shoreside office and available for review, at the request of the Coast Guard.
( b ) A TSMS certificate is valid for 5 years from the date of issue, unless suspended, revoked or rescinded as provided in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section.
( c ) The vessel owner or managing operator must maintain a list of vessels currently covered by each TSMS certificate and must provide it to the Coast Guard upon request.
( d ) A TSMS certificate may be suspended or revoked by the Coast Guard at any time for non-compliance with the requirements of this part.
( e ) The TPO that issued the TSMS certificate may rescind the certificate for non-compliance with the requirements of this part.
( f ) A copy of the TSMS certificate must be maintained on each towing vessel that is covered by the TSMS certificate and on file at the owner or managing operator's shoreside office.
§ 159.007-11 Production inspections and tests: Yearly report. ( a ) When the manufacturer uses the production inspection and test procedures in an applicable subpart he must submit a yearly report. The report is not required when inspection and test procedures approved under § 159.007-3 are used.
( b ) The report must include the following: ( 1 ) A list of all inspections and tests performed;
( 2 ) A summary of the results of each group of inspections or tests;
( 3 ) A detailed description of any test failures; and
( 4 ) A statement whether or not all required tests were performed.
§ 617.9 Complaints. ( a ) Any person, individually or as a member of a class or on behalf of others, may file a complaint with NSF, alleging discrimination prohibited by the Act. A complainant shall file a complaint within 180 days from the date the complainant first had knowledge of the alleged act of discrimination. However, for good cause shown, NSF may extend this time limit.
( b ) NSF will accept as a sufficient complaint, any written statement which identifies the parties involved and the date the complainant first had knowledge of the alleged violation, describes generally the action or practice complained of, and is signed by the complainant. If an insufficient complaint is amended within 10 working days after notice by NSF to the complainant of the deficiency, NSF will consider the amended complaint as filed on the date the original insufficient complaint was filed for purposes of determining if it was timely filed. However, all other time requirements established by the Act and this part shall run from the date the amended complaint was filed.
( c ) On receipt of any complaint NSF shall promptly send written acknowledgement to the complainant, and a copy of the complaint to the recipient. In addition, NSF shall send either copies of this part or other pertinent information describing the rights and obligations of the parties.
( d ) NSF will return to the complainant any complaint outside the coverage of this part, and will state why it is outside the coverage of this part.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BIG GUY’S PINBALL, LLC.,

Plaintiff,

vs Case No: 14-14185

Honorable Victoria A. Roberts

JIMMY LIPHAM.

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE

DEFENDANT’S THIRD-PARTY BENEFICIARY DEFENSES (DOC. #48);

DEFENDANT’S STATUS REPORT (DOC. #49); AND PLAINTIFF’S

RESPONSE AND MOTION WITH RESPECT TO DEFENDANT’S 

STATUS REPORT (DOC. #50)

At the Court’s request, Plaintiff filed the above entitled motion. The Court did not

expect the Defendant’s Status Report or Plaintiff’s Response in advance of an October

13, 2015 scheduled Status Conference. The conference was held. Attending were

Robert Farr representing the Plaintiff and Jimmy Lipham representing the Defendant. 

Based on the discussion held:

1. The above papers are all STRICKEN. Plaintiff may refile the motion at the

close of discovery.

2. By Wednesday, October 22, 2015, the parties are ordered to file either a

joint discovery plan if they can agree or separate plans. The Court will

use the submissions to fashion a discovery order.

2:14-cv-14185-VAR-RSW Doc # 51 Filed 10/15/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 862
IT IS ORDERED.

s/Victoria A. Roberts 

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

Dated: October 15, 2015

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this

document was served on the attorneys of

record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

October 15, 2015.

s/Linda Vertriest 

Deputy Clerk

2:14-cv-14185-VAR-RSW Doc # 51 Filed 10/15/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 863
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, THE undersigned officer of Nextera Enterprises, Inc.
(the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities
Act of 10934, as amended; and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 14, 2003

                                        /s/ Daniel R. Fischel
                                        -----------------------
                                        Daniel R. Fischel
                                        Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.




                                       31
<PAGE>
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Nextera Enterprises, Inc.
(the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities
Act of 10934, as amended; and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 14, 2003

                                        /s/ Michael P. Muldowney
                                        ------------------------
                                        Michael P. Muldowney
                                        Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.


                                       32
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 233 (Tuesday, December 5, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 70512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9547]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting (amended).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, December 7, 2006, 10 a.m.-3:30 p.m.

PLACE: U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave, NW., 
Suite 150, Washington, DC 20005. (Metro Stop: Metro Center).

AGENDA: The Commission will receive presentations on public comments 
received for the DRAFT Procedural Manual for Voting System Testing and 
Certification Program and the proposed final document will be 
considered for approval. The Commission will receive presentations from 
election officials, community interest groups, academicians and 
technology experts regarding the 2006 election. The Commission will 
elect officers for 2007 and consider other administrative matters. In 
addition, the Commission will consider the adoption of a voter fraud 
and intimidation report and the adoption of an administrative policy 
and procedures manual.
    This meeting will be open to the public.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 
566-3100.

Donetta L. Davidson,
Commissioner, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 06-9547 Filed 12-1-06; 1:22 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M
#### David Comoli *v.*State of Vermont.

January Term, 1906.

Present: Howell, C. J., Tyleb, Munson, Watson, and Miles, JJ.

Opinion filed February 16, 1906.

*Petition for New Trial*— Newly *Discovered Evidence*— Affi*davits*— Sufficiency—Allegations *of Due Diligence.*

The statement, in affidavits accompanying a petition for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, that the affiants “used due diligence” seasonably to obtain such evidence, is mere opinion, and insufficient to show the requisite diligence.

The newly discovered evidence revealed by affidavits attached to a petition for a new trial in behalf of one convicted of a simple assault, *held*not likely to produce a different result on another trial.

Petition for a new trial, brought under V. S. 1662, to the Supreme Court for Washington County at its January Term, 1906, and then heard on petition and affidavits thereto attached. At the September Term, 1905, of Washington county court, the petitioner was. convicted of a simple assault, upon an indictment for an assault with intent to kill one Mary Broggi. The newly discovered evidence relied upon is set forth in the affidavit of Depa Whitney which is attached to< the petition.

*424
      *John N. Harvey*for the petitioner.

*Hollister*Jackson, State’s Attorney, for the State.

RowELL, C. J.

It is considered that the newly discovered evidence attached to the petition would not be likely to produce a different result on another trial.

It is also' considered that the affidavits thereto attached do- not show the requisite diligence. They state only that the affiants “used due diligence,” which is only an opinion, upon which the Court cannot act. They should have stated the facts, that the Court might judge of the matter.

*Petition dismissed.*
<TABLE>

Exhibit 11.0      Statement Regarding Computation Of Earnings Per Share
                                          (Unaudited)
                      (In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

<S>                                                    <C>              <C>                  <C>              <C>
                                                            Three Months Ended                  Nine Months Ended
                                                               September 30,                      September 30,
                                                           2004           2003                2004           2003
Net income available to
   common shareholders                                 $  1,151         $  794               $1,175         2,374

Total weighted average
   common shares outstanding                          1,508,636      1,481,347           1,503,608      1,467,496

Basic earnings per common share                           $ .76         $  .54               $ .78        $  1.62

Total weighted average
   common shares outstanding                          1,508,636      1,481,347           1,503,608      1,467,496

Dilutive effect of stock options using
   the treasury stock method                             71,768         74,384              80,074         69,969

Total average common and common
   equivalent shares                                  1,580,404      1,555,731           1,583,682      1,537,465

Diluted earnings per common share                         $ .73          $ .51               $ .74        $  1.54

</TABLE>
#### § 112.01-15 Temporary emergency power source.

A temporary emergency power source is one of limited capacity that carries, for a short time, selected emergency loads while an emergency power source of larger capacity is being started.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The California Coast Provincial Advisory Committee (CCPAC) will meet for one day on April 25, 2007 in Ukiah, California. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss issues relating to implementing the Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP).

# DATES:

The meeting will be held from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. on April 25, 2007.

# ADDRESSES:

Bureau of Land Management Field Office, 2550 North State Street, Ukiah, California.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kathy Allen, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Six Rivers National Forest, 1330 Bayshore Way, Eureka, CA 95501 (707) 441-3557 or                         *kmallen@fs.fed.us*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda topics to be covered include: (1) Forest Service Planning Rules; (2) Survey and Manage Update; (3) National Park Service Centennial Initiative; (4) Monitoring Program Update; (5) Lacks Creek Project; (6) Regional Interagency Ecosystem Committee (RIEC) Decisions; (7) Aquatic Conservation Strategy; and (7) NWFP Update.

The meeting is open to the public. Public input opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

Dated: April 13, 2007.

William Metz,

Deputy Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 07-1934 Filed 4-18-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Valley Ridge Financial Corp. (the "Company") that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.



|Dated:  March 31, 2003 |  | /s/ Richard L. Edgar                                                                  
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | Richard L. Edgar
President and Chief Executive Officer                                
|                       |  |                                                                                       
|                       |  |                                                                                       
|                       |  |                                                                                       
|Dated:  March 31, 2003 |  | /s/ Michael E. McHugh                                                                 
|                       |  | Michael E. McHugh
Secretary and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

|The signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Valley Ridge Financial Corp. and will be retained by Valley Ridge Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------