alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2008121EN.01001701.xml

| 17.5.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/17

---

Types of gas and the corresponding supply pressures according to Article 2(2) of Council Directive 90/396/EEC

(2008/C 121/14)

(This publication is based on information received by the Commission services from the Member States)

(This publication is based on information received by the Commission services from the Member States)

| Country | Gas family | Wobbe index (gross) in | Supply pressure in mbar |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MJ/m3 or kWh/m3

  (0 °C) | MJ/m3 or kWh/m3

  (15 °C) | min. | nom. | max. |
| BULGARIA | SECOND | | | | | |
| Group H | 48,2-53,6 MJ/m3 | 45,7-54,7 MJ/m3 | 17 | 20 | 25 |
| THIRD | | | | | |
| Group B/P | | 72,9-87,3 MJ/m3 | 25 | 30 | 35 |

Country

Gas family

Wobbe index (gross) in

Supply pressure in mbar

MJ/m3 or kWh/m3

3

3

(0 °C)

MJ/m3 or kWh/m3

3

3

(15 °C)

min.

nom.

max.

BULGARIA

SECOND

Group H

48,2-53,6 MJ/m3

3

45,7-54,7 MJ/m3

3

17

20

25

THIRD

Group B/P

72,9-87,3 MJ/m3

3

25

30

35

---
§ 11.410 Requirements for deck officer endorsements for vessels of less than 1,600 GRT. ( a ) Endorsements as master and mate of vessels of less than 1,600 GRT are issued in the following tonnage categories: ( 1 ) Less than 1,600 GRT.
( 2 ) Less than 500 GRT.
( 3 ) Between 25 and 200 GRT in 50-ton increments and with appropriate mode of propulsion such as self-propelled, sail, or auxiliary sail.
( b ) Experience gained in the engine department on vessels of appropriate tonnage may be creditable for up to 90 days of the service requirements for any master or mate endorsement in this category.
( c ) An officer's endorsement in this category obtained with an orally assisted examination will be limited to 200 GRT. In order to raise that tonnage limit to 1,600 GRT, the written examination and service requirements must be satisfied.
[USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 77909, Dec. 24, 2013, as amended by USCG-2021-0348, 87 FR 3223, Jan. 21, 2022]
§ 15.701 Officers Competency Certificates Convention, 1936. ( a ) This section implements the Officers Competency Certificates Convention, 1936 (see 46 U.S.C. 8304), and applies to each vessel documented under the laws of the United States navigating seaward of the Boundary Lines in part 7 of this chapter, except: ( 1 ) A public vessel;
( 2 ) A wooden vessel of primitive build, such as a dhow or junk;
( 3 ) A barge; and
( 4 ) A vessel of less than 200 gross tons.
( b ) The master, mates and engineers on any vessel to which this section applies must hold a license or MMC officer endorsement to serve in that capacity issued by the Coast Guard under parts 10 and 11 of this subchapter.
( c ) A vessel to which this section applies, or a foreign flag vessel to which the Officers Competency Certificates Convention applies, may be detained by a designated official until that official is satisfied that the vessel is in compliance with the Convention. *Designated official* includes Coast Guard officers, Coast Guard petty officers and officers or employees of the Customs and Border Protection Service.
( d ) Whenever a vessel is detained, the owner, charterer, managing operator, agent, master, or individual in charge may appeal the detention within 5 days under the provisions of § 2.01-70 of this chapter.
[CGD 81-059, 52 FR 38652, Oct. 16, 1987, as amended by USCG-2006-24371, 74 FR 11261, Mar. 16, 2009; USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 78004, Dec. 24, 2013]
Exhibit 11

             Statement Regarding Computation Of Earnings Per Share

                                     Three Months Ended      Six Months Ended
                                          June 30,               June 30,
                                    ---------------------  ---------------------
                                       2001        2000       2001       2000
                                    ----------  ---------  ----------  ---------
Net income available to
   common shareholders ...........  $      502        549  $    1,047      1,001

Total weighted average
   common shares outstanding .....   1,453,986  1,639,293   1,466,194  1,642,810

Basic earnings per common share ..  $      .35        .33  $      .71        .61
                                    ==========  =========  ==========  =========
Total weighted average
   common shares outstanding .....   1,453,986  1,639,293   1,466,194  1,642,810

Dilutive effect of stock
   options using the treasury
   stock method ..................      14,800         --      14,416         --

Total average common and
   common equivalent shares ......   1,468,786  1,639,293   1,480,610  1,642,810

Diluted earnings per share .......  $      .34        .33  $      .71        .61
                                    ==========  =========  ==========  =========
# C_2008230EN.01002001.xml

| 9.9.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/20

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92

Modification by Italy of the public service obligation in respect of the following scheduled air services: Alghero-Rome, Alghero-Milan, Cagliari-Rome, Cagliari-Milan, Olbia-Rome and Olbia-Milan

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 230/14)

In accordance with Article 4(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2408/92 of 23 July 1992 on access for Community air carriers to intra-Community air routes, the Italian Government has decided to modify the public service obligation in respect of the following scheduled air services: Alghero-Rome, Alghero-Milan, Cagliari-Rome, Cagliari-Milan, Olbia-Rome and Olbia-Milan, published in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 72 of 24.3.2006, and amended in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 141 of 26.6.2007,
  Official Journal of the European Union C 195 of 23.8.2007 and
  Official Journal of the European Union C 121 of 17.5.2008.

Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with point 4.6 of the public service obligation, the fares are revised as follows:

| Route | Maximum reduced fare
  VAT included | Maximum full fare
  VAT included |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Alghero-Rome or vice versa | EUR 50 | EUR 112 |
| Alghero-Milan or vice versa | EUR 61 | EUR 128 |
| Cagliari-Rome or vice versa | EUR 50 | EUR 112 |
| Cagliari-Milan or vice versa | EUR 61 | EUR 128 |
| Olbia-Rome or vice versa | EUR 50 | EUR 112 |
| Olbia-Milan or vice versa | EUR 61 | EUR 128 |

Route

Maximum reduced fare

VAT included

Maximum full fare

VAT included

Alghero-Rome or vice versa

vice versa

EUR 50

EUR 112

Alghero-Milan or vice versa

vice versa

EUR 61

EUR 128

Cagliari-Rome or vice versa

vice versa

EUR 50

EUR 112

Cagliari-Milan or vice versa

vice versa

EUR 61

EUR 128

Olbia-Rome or vice versa

vice versa

EUR 50

EUR 112

Olbia-Milan or vice versa

vice versa

EUR 61

EUR 128

The other requirements of the public service obligation published in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 72 of 24.3.2006 remain unchanged.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
Exhibit 10.23
 [DEFERRED SETTLEMENT]
 RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT
UNDER THE
LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
2005 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
       Grant of Restricted Stock Units 50,000




---



##### 



Vesting.
 Settlement of Restricted Stock Units
 provided however
 provided however provided however
 Dividends and Dividend Equivalents.
  2




---



##### 



Rights of Stockholder.
 No Right to Continued Employment.
 Transferability.
 Tax Withholding.
 Notice.
 Arbitration.
  3




---



##### 



Governing Law.
 Employment Agreement Superseded.
 Signature in Counterparts
   4




---



##### 



LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.By:
    /s/ Avi KatzName:
    Avi KatzTitle:
    Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary/s/ Michael B. TargoffGrantee:  Michael B. Targoff  
 
 
 
  5
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 67 (Monday, April 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 17578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1711]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Availability of the Abbreviated Final Environmental Impact 
Statement and General Management Plan Amendment for Dayton Aviation 
Heritage National Historical Park, OH

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(c)), the National Park Service (NPS) 
announces the availability for the Abbreviated Final Environmental 
Impact Statement and General Management Plan Amendment (EIS/GMPA) for 
Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park, Ohio.

DATES: The Abbreviated Final EIS/GMPA will remain available for public 
review for 30 days following the publishing of the notice of its 
availability in the Federal Register by the U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency.

ADDRESSES: Requests for copies should be sent to the Superintendent, 
Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park, P.O. Box 9280, 
Wright Brothers Station, Dayton, Ohio 45409-7705. You may also view the 
document via the Internet through the NPS Planning, Environment, and 
Public Comment (PEPC) Web site (http://parkplanning.nps.gov); simply 
click on the link to Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NPS prepared a Draft EIS/GMPA for Dayton 
Aviation Heritage National Historical Park pursuant to section 
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. The draft 
was made available for public review for 60 days (January-March) during 
which time the NPS distributed over 200 copies of the draft. In 
addition to the distribution, the draft EIS/GMPA was also made 
available at the park, on the Internet, and at area libraries. A total 
of 10 written comments were received, and 20 participants attended 2 
open houses. The consensus from the public comment period was that the 
NPS is pursuing the correct path for the site in Alternatives C, the 
preferred alternative. Comments from individuals and public agencies 
did not require the NPS to add other alternatives, significantly alter 
existing alternatives, or make changes to the impact analysis of the 
effects of any alternative. Because of the lack of substantive 
comments, the NPS is issuing an abbreviated final EIS/GMPA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Superintendent, Dayton Aviation 
Heritage National Historical Park, P.O. Box 9280, Wright Brothers 
Station, Dayton, Ohio 45409-7705, telephone 937-225-7705.

    Dated: August 15, 2006.
Ernest Quintana,
Director, Midwest Region.

    Editorial Note: This document was received at the Office of the 
Federal Register on April 3, 2007.

[FR Doc. 07-1711 Filed 4-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-88-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

SARAH RODRIGUEZ on behalf of U.R.R.,

a minor,

Plaintiff,

v.

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

 /

Case No. 14-14170

Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S JANUARY 13,

2016 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND REMANDING THE CASE BACK TO THE

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY [17]

This matter came before the Court on the magistrate judge’s January 13, 2016 report

and recommendation. The magistrate judge recommended that the Court grant in part

Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and deny Defendant’s motion for summary

judgment. Neither party has filed objections. “[T]he failure to object to the magistrate

judge’s report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Hall

v. Rawal, 09-10933, 2012 WL 3639070, at *1 (E.D.Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citing Thomas v.

Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985)). The Court nevertheless agrees with the magistrate judge’s

recommendation. 

Being fully advised in the premises, having read the pleadings, and for the reasons

set forth above, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, and therefore GRANTS IN PART Plaintiff’s motion for summary

2:14-cv-14170-NGE-DRG Doc # 18 Filed 02/29/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 586
judgment, DENIES Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and REMANDS the case

back to the Commission of Social Security pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

So ordered.

s/Nancy G. Edmunds 

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge

Dated: February 29, 2016

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on February 29, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Johnetta Curry-Williams 

Case Manager

2

2:14-cv-14170-NGE-DRG Doc # 18 Filed 02/29/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 587
§ 126.510 Annual and periodic inspections. ( a ) *Annual inspection.* Your vessel must undergo an annual inspection within 3 months before or after each anniversary date, except as required in paragraph (b) of this section. ( 1 ) You must contact the cognizant OCMI to schedule an inspection at a time and place which he or she approves. No written application is required.
( 2 ) The scope of the annual inspection is the same as the inspection for certification as specified in § 126.430, but in less detail unless the cognizant marine inspector finds deficiencies or determines that a major change has occurred since the last inspection. If deficiencies are found or a major change to the vessel has occurred, the marine inspector will conduct an inspection more detailed in scope to ensure that the vessel is in satisfactory condition and fit for the service for which it is intended. If your vessel passes the annual inspection, the marine inspector will endorse your current Certificate of Inspection.
( 3 ) If the annual inspection reveals deficiencies in your vessel's maintenance, you must make any or all repairs or improvements within the time period specified by the OCMI.
( 4 ) Nothing in this subpart limits the marine inspector from making such tests or inspections he or she deems necessary to be assured of the vessel's seaworthiness.
( b ) *Periodic inspection.* Your vessel must undergo a periodic inspection within 3 months before or after the second or third anniversary of the date of your vessel's Certificate of Inspection. This periodic inspection will take the place of an annual inspection. ( 1 ) You must contact the cognizant OCMI to schedule an inspection at a time and place which he or she approves. No written application is required.
( 2 ) The scope of the periodic inspection is the same as that for the inspection for certification, as specified in § 126.430. The OCMI will insure that the vessel is in satisfactory condition and fit for the service for which it is intended. If your vessel passes the periodic inspection, the marine inspector will endorse your current Certificate of Inspection.
( 3 ) If the periodic inspection reveals deficiencies in your vessel's maintenance, you must make any or all repairs or improvements within the time period specified by the OCMI.
( 4 ) Nothing in this subpart limits the marine inspector from conducting such tests or inspections he or she deems necessary to be assured of the vessel's seaworthiness.
§ 121.202 Restrictions. ( a ) The use of gasoline for cooking, heating, or lighting is prohibited on all vessels.
( b ) Fireplaces or other space heating equipment with open flames are prohibited on all vessels.
( c ) Vessels permitted to use liquefied and non-liquefied gases as cooking fuels by 46 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 147 must meet the requirements of § 121.240. The use of these fuels for cooking, heating, and lighting on ferry vessels is prohibited by part 147 in subchapter N of this chapter.
# ! ; NBarr Footer: Date: 6/3/2004 4:10:56 PM File: C:\Temp\Test.mxd User: bal 0 100 Kilometers



### MODELING DOMAIN Taconite BART Modeling Taconite Industry Group Minnesota 0 100 Miles 

## Legend Modeling Domain 

### Class I Area BWCA Voyageurs
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40196 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus EDUARDO GUZMAN RESENDEZ, also known as Juan Garcia Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-97-CR-267-1

- - - - - - - - - - June 16, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Eduardo Guzman Resendez, also known as Juan Garcia Gonzalez, appeals his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). He argues that the district court erred by applying the sentencing guideline adjustment for obstruction of justice pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1. We review the district court’s legal interpretation and application of the sentencing guidelines de novo and its factual findings for clear error.No. 98-40196 -2- United States v. Lowder , 148 F.3d 548, 552 (5th Cir. 1998). Because the record indicates that Guzman Resendez produced a fraudulent financial affidavit during his initial appearance before the magistrate judge, the district court did not commit error, clear or otherwise, by applying the adjustment for obstruction of justice. See § 3C1.1, comment. (n.4(c)). Guzman Resendez also argues that the district court erred by applying the 16-level increase pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b) because he had been previously deported subsequent to an aggravated-felony conviction for possession of over 50 pounds of marijuana. His argument regarding this issue is precluded by our decision in United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez , 130 F.3d 691 (5th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is
AFFIRMED.
amILD c. MANN

mr.*.

..“.UL

**r**

**. .** 

**4 OFFICE**  **OF THE**  **ATTORNEY GENERAL**  **OF TEXAS**  AUSTIN /

Eon; 8. I..

Shelton County hudltor Johnson County Cleburne,Texas.
Dear Sir: Cplnlon %. C-724

how nuEh per diem?"

*Transport&ion ot prboners. The mana**gar** shallwake suitable provision8and regulatlons for the cafe and speedy **tran~orkatlon** of prisoners tron couutleewhere oentenoed to **the** State penltentleryby the sheriffs of suchEon. E. L. Sheltm, June 8,1939, Page 2

reqmatloe counties if auoh **sheriffs** are willIng to perform such aenloea **as** ohaply as aald oaamIaalooeen have it dam otherrise. j **3ald** traoaportatlon shall be on State aoaount and In no laatanoe shall the prlaooerabe oarrled direct trcna the oounty jails to the State farm, but shall rlrat bo oarrled to the reoelving stationas designatedby the prison board ahera the aharaoter of labor which each prisonermay reasoneblyperfom shall be deternlned...."
It la apparent from a readily of the above U&that It la the **duty** of the ma.mger of the prisonatasystem to make suitableprovisionaand regulationsror the sate and speedy tranaportatlon of prlaonerafrosz

counties where aentenoed**to the**  **state** penitentiaryby the aherltta of auoh respectivecountlea It auoh aherlfta are wlfllng to perform auoh aervloea as oheeply as Bald oaamission oan have It dons othemlae. It la furtherapparent that if auoh aheriftaere not wiUlng to perfcm such eervlaea as cheaply as said conm.ls~lon can bare It done otherwise, then in that. event the prison oomlaalon, through Its menager

t may oontraot **ior** auoh aenloea elaawhere. We oan aae DO agel InhIbItIonrhieh **would prawent**  the manager ot the trlaon ayat=, either **personally** or by some legslly l

ut orbed agent, traa oontraotlng with the ocamIaalonere~oourt of the oouaty ror the providingor over**night** lodging and feeding of state prisoners on the way to the penItentIaryby the oouaty in the oounty jail. Be can see no lo@ InhIbItIon whleh would prevent an lndependant contraotor,hr,rlng a contraotwith the manager of **the** prison spat rhera aentanoed

72 to transportprlaonera from countlea the atate penltentlary,iram oontractIng with the oo~aalonera* oourt of the oouaty for the **prorldlag** of overnightlodging end feedlq or state prlboners on the my to the penitentiaryby the county In the eountg jaIL

Therefore, In enawef to your question,you are respectfullyadvised that It la the opinion of this department that any valid olalm tor overnlcht lodging and feeding of prlaonereon the wey ti the paftentlary shouldEon. S. 1. Shelton, June 8, 1939, Page S

be preaknted to the **party** or ayatea oontraotlng for auop overnight lcdglq and feeding of prisonore. You am further respeotiullyadvised that the amount of the claim or olalma should be the amount prevloualy agreed upoh or contractedfor by and between the perties to the ooatreot.

are Trusting that this anewem your lnqulr~,we

APi??OVED:

-*w X-l’Oi?!EY

DIs?liXAL

OF TE **COMMIREE**
§ 137.205 External survey program. ( a ) The owner or managing operator of a towing vessel that has selected the TSMS option and who has chosen to demonstrate compliance through an external survey program must: ( 1 ) Have the vessel surveyed annually by a surveyor from a TPO;
( 2 ) Ensure the survey is conducted in accordance with § 137.215;
( 3 ) Ensure the survey is conducted within 3 months of the anniversary date of the COI;
( 4 ) Ensure the TSMS applicable to the vessel includes policies and procedures for complying with this section; and
( 5 ) Make the applicable sections of the TSMS available to the surveyor.
( b ) The TPO must issue a report that meets the requirements in § 137.135.