alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.966 Discharge by liquid displacement. The person in charge of cargo transfer may not authorize cargo discharge by liquid displacement unless the liquid supply line to the tank has: ( a ) A safety relief or pressure reducing valve set to operate at no more than 80 percent of the tank's relief valve setting; and
( b ) A manual control valve between the tank and the supply line's safety relief valve or pressure reducing valve.
# C_2013252EN.01004803.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/48

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 June 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-100/11) (1)

1

(Civil service - Officials - Remuneration - Daily allowance - Conditions for granting - Actual establishment in the place of employment - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law - Legal costs - Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure)

2013/C 252/86

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and J. Banquero Cruz, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision refusing to grant to the applicant the daily allowances linked to the decision relating to transfer him from the delegation in Angola to headquarters in Brussels.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.

| 2. | Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

| 3. | Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay to the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union the sum of EUR 2 000. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay to the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union the sum of EUR 2 000.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2012, p. 67.

1

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.1415 Air compressor.

Each vessel must have an air compressor to recharge the bottles for the air-breathing apparatus.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

On October 29, 2018, the Court denied Jethro Powers’ motion to vacate, set aside, or 

correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (ECF No. 145.) 

For the reasons set forth in the Opinion and Order, the Court finds that reasonable jurists 

could not debate whether “the petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the 

issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Miller—El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). Jackson has not made a “substantial showing of the denial of 

a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Thus, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

s/Laurie J. Michelson 

LAURIE J. MICHELSON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Date: March 8, 2019 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff/Respondent, 

 

v. 

 

JETHRO RENE POWERS, 

 Defendant/Petitioner. 

Case No. 14-20449 

Honorable Laurie J. Michelson 

Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen 

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY 
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record 

and/or pro se parties on this date, March 8, 2019, using the Electronic Court Filing system and/or 

first-class U.S. mail. 

s/William Barkholz 

Case Manager
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.421 Allowable stress.

The allowable stress for the integral tank structure must meet the American Bureau of Shipping's allowable stress for the vessel's hull published in “Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels”, 1981.

[CGD 74-289, 44 FR 26009, May 3, 1979, as amended by CGD 77-069, 52 FR 31630, Aug. 21, 1987]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the "Form
10-QSB") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").

     I, Jose' A. Infante, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Issuer, certify that:

     (i)  the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
          78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

Dated: May 15, 2006


                                        /s/ Jose' A. Infante
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Jose' A. Infante
                                        Chairman, President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer


                                      -29-
#### § 12.605 Requirements to qualify for an STCW endorsement as ratings forming part of a navigational watch (RFPNW).

(a) To qualify for endorsement as an RFPNW on a seagoing vessel of 500 GT or more, an applicant must—

(1) Be not less than 16 years of age;

(2) Provide evidence of service as follows:

(i) Six months of seagoing service, which includes training and experience associated with navigational watchkeeping functions and involves the performance of duties carried out under the supervision of the master, mate, or qualified STCW deck rating; or

(ii) Proof of successful completion of Coast Guard-approved or -accepted training, which includes not less than 2 months of approved seagoing service; and

(3) Provide evidence of meeting standards of competence prescribed in Table A-II/4 of the STCW Code (incorporated by reference, see [§ 12.103 of this part](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/part-12/section-12.103)).

(b) The Coast Guard may exempt an applicant from meeting any individual knowledge, understanding, and proficiency required in Section A-II/4 of the STCW Code. These exemptions must be approved by the Coast Guard based upon vessel type. Under these circumstances, the endorsement may include a corresponding limitation.

(c) Seafarers with the following national rating endorsements will be eligible for this endorsement upon completion of requirements designated in this section:

Table 1 to [§ 12.605](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-12.605)(c)—STCW Endorsement as RFPNW

| Entry path from national endorsements | Sea service under authority of the endorsement1 | Competence—STCW Table A-II/42 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| A/B unlimited | None | Y |
| A/B limited | None | Y |
| A/B special | None | Y |
| A/B-offshore supply vessels | None | Y |
| A/B sail | None | Y |
| A/B-fishing industry | None | Y |
| Ordinary seaman | 6 mo.3 | Y |
| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 This column provides the minimum additional service required of the seafarer in order to meet the requirements of this section. | | |
| 2 Complete any items in [paragraph (a)(3)](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-12.605#p-12.605(a)(3)) of this section not previously satisfied. | | |
| 3 The service may be reduced to 2 months if training has been completed as part of an approved training program meeting the requirements of [paragraph (a)(2)(ii)](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-12.605#p-12.605(a)(2)(ii)) of this section. | | |
Editorial Note on Part 147
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 147 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59782, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 147.70 Acetylene. ( a ) Seventeen cubic meters (600 standard cubic feet) or less of acetylene may be stowed on or below decks on any vessel.
( b ) More than 17 m3 (600 standard cubic feet) of acetylene may be on board a vessel engaged in industrial operations, if it is stowed on deck.
**Exhibit 21.1**     The active subsidiaries owned directly or indirectly by Loral    Space & Communications Inc. as of March 1,    2007, all 100% owned (except as noted below) consist of the    following:    Loral Space &    Communications Holdings Corporation     Delaware    Loral Skynet    Corporation(1) Delaware    Loral Asia Pacific Satellite (HK)    Limited     Hong Kong    Loral Skynet International,    L.L.C.      Delaware    Loral Holdings Ltd.      Bermuda    Loral Space do Brasil Ltda.      Brazil    Loral Skynet do Brasil Ltda.      Brazil    Loral Skynet (IOM) Limited     Isle of Man    Loral Communications Services,    Inc.      Delaware    Loral Ground Services, L.L.C.      Delaware    Loralsat CIA    Ltda(2) Ecuador    Loral Skynet Network Services,    Inc.      Delaware    Loral Skynet Network Services    (Europe) Ltd.      United Kingdom    Loral Skynet Network Services    Holdings L.L.C.      Delaware    Loral CyberStar International,    Inc.      Delaware    Tel-Link Communications Private    Limited     India    Loral CyberStar    GmbH(3) Germany    ONS-Mauritius     Mauritius    Loral CyberStar Services,    Inc.      Delaware    Loral CyberStar Holdings,    L.L.C.      Delaware    Loral CyberStar de Argentina SRL     Argentina    Loral CyberStar, L.L.C.      Delaware    CyberStar, L.L.C.      Delaware    Loral Satmex Ltd.      Bermuda    Skynet Satellite Holdings    Corporation     Delaware    Skynet Satellite Corporation     Delaware    Space Systems/Loral, Inc.      Delaware    International Space Technology,    Inc.(4) Delaware    Cosmotech(4) Russian Federation    Loral Holdings Corporation     Delaware    Loral General Partner, Inc.      Delaware    LGP (Bermuda) Ltd.      Bermuda    Loral Holdings LLC     Delaware    Mexico Satellite,    LLC(5) Delaware    Loral Global Services N.V.      Netherlands Antilles    Loral Global Services B.V.      Netherlands    4363205 Canada    Inc.(6) Canada    4363213 Canada    Inc.(6) Canada    4363230 Canada    Inc.(6) Canada     **NOTES**(1)    100% of Loral Skynet Series A    12% Non-convertible    Preferred Stock is owned by third parties (2)    Only 95% owned directly or indirectly (3)    Only 99.5% owned directly or indirectly (4)    Only 51.0% owned directly or indirectly (5)    Only 77.78% owned directly or indirectly (6)    Company formed for the purpose of effecting the Telesat    acquisition; upon closing of such acquisition, Public Sector    Pension Investment Board will acquire its direct or indirect    proportionate interest in such company.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 (the "Form 10-Q") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").





I, Heather D. Brolick, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, certify that to my knowledge:





(i)
the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii)
the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.





Dated: August 14, 2012





/s/ Heather D. Brolick


Heather D. Brolick


President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. �, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Birch Mountain Resources Ltd. (the"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, DouglasJ. Rowe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that: 

| 1. 
  The Report fully complies with    the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and 
2. 
  The information contained in the    Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition    and results of operations of the Company. 
Date: June 29, 2004 

  /s/ Douglas J. Rowe  
Name: Douglas J. Rowe    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# C_2008181EN.01002401.xml

| 18.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 181/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 181/24

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1628/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to national regional investment aid

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 181/08)

| Aid No | XR 10/08 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Malta |
| Region | Malta |
| Title of aid scheme or the name of the undertaking receiving ad hoc aid supplement | Investment Aid Scheme |
| Legal basis | Investment Aid Regulations |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Annual budget | MTL 13 million |
| Maximum aid intensity | 30 % |
| In conformity with Article 4 of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 1.1.2008 |
| Duration | 31.12.2013 |
| Economic sectors | Limited to specific sectors |
| NACE D, K072, K0731, K07482, K07486, M0803, N0851, O0921 |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Malta Enterprise |
| Enterprise Centre |
| San Gwann SGN 3000 |
| Malta |

Aid No

XR 10/08

Member State

Malta

Region

Malta

Title of aid scheme or the name of the undertaking receiving ad hoc aid supplement

ad hoc

Investment Aid Scheme

Legal basis

Investment Aid Regulations

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Annual budget

MTL 13 million

Maximum aid intensity

30 %

In conformity with Article 4 of the Regulation

Date of implementation

1.1.2008

Duration

31.12.2013

Economic sectors

Limited to specific sectors

NACE D, K072, K0731, K07482, K07486, M0803, N0851, O0921

Name and address of the granting authority

Malta Enterprise

Enterprise Centre

San Gwann SGN 3000

Malta

Internet address of the publication of the aid scheme

www.maltaenterprise.com

Other information

—

---
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)Certification**

I, Antonio Rodriquez, certify that

1.               I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NexteraEnterprises, Inc.;

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)              designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

c)              disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

b)             any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 
| Date: May 15, 2007 |
|--------------------|
|               |
|               | By:   /s/ Antonio Rodriquez |   |
|               | Chief Financial  Officer |
|               | (Principal  Financial Officer) |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

December 7, 2012

t1204

Order 

December 7, 2012

146215 & (15)(16)

GEORGE RODRIGUEZ a/k/a GEORGE

RODRIGUES, and MARY RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 146215

COA: 312626

Wayne CC: 12-002377-CH

BANK OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

MERS, QUICKEN LOANS, and WAYNE

COUNTY,

Defendants. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 1, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions to 

stay and waive bond are DENIED.
#### § 118.520 Installation and location.

Portable fire extinguishers must be located so that they are clearly visible and readily accessible from the space being protected. The installation and location must be to the satisfaction of the cognizant OCMI.
## BRENTWOOD ^ -TRAVE L'
Februar y24 , 201 0 :}-^ TQFl;--.PORTAIIO N Th e Honorabl e Ra

yLaHoo d Secretar y, i •••if ; Unite d State s Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 NewJerse

yAvenue , S

E Wasiiington , D.C

. 2059 0 Subject : Haned a Combinatio n Service s Allocatio n Proceedin g DOT-OST-2010-001 8 Dea rSecretar

yLaHood : A s a dedicate d trave l partne ro fAmerica n Airlines , I a m writin g i n support o fAmerican' s applicatio n t o provid e ne wservic e fro m NewYork' s Joh n F

. Kenned yInternationa l Airpor t an d Lb s Ahgele s Internationa l Airpor t t o Tokyo Internationa l Airpor t a t Haneda

. I recognize , an d applau d yo u an d th e Obam a administratio n fo ryou rsuccess las t Decembe r i n reachin g a landmar k

Ope n Skies agreemen t wit h Japan , whic h open s u p Haned a t o servic e b yU.S

. airlines

. 1 encourag e you rselectio n o fAmerica n Airline s t o provid e nonsto p servic e fro m NewYor k an d Lo s Angele s t o Haned a i n orde rt o provid e a n essentia l connectio n betwee n thre e o fth e world' s larges t financia l an d commerc e centers

. Recen t events , includin g th e successfu l preservatio n o fJapa n Airlines ' oneworl d Allianc e membership , hav

e underscore d American' s stron g commitmen t t o th e trans-Pacifi cmarket

. America n i s likewis e committe d t o NewYor k an d Lo s Angele s - bot h vita l foca l point s o f business , trade , entertainment , technolog yan d educatio n - providin g unsurpasse d ai r servic e sinc e th e mid-1900 s Bot h th e NewYor k

an d Lo s Angele s metr o areas wil l gai n significan t economi cbenefit s fro m thes e propose d ne wflights , a s wil l American' s customers an d employees

. However , w e nee d you rhel p t o mak

e th e JF K& LAX/Haned a connectio n a reality

. Therefore , I strongl yurg e yo u t o sa yye s t o America n Airline s an d it s reques t fo rslot s t o fl y fro m Kenned yan d Lo

s Angele s t o Haneda ! Sincere ,
Stephani e Turner , CT

C Presiden t Brentwoo d Trave l St

. Louis , Missour i
§ 617.10 Mediation. ( a ) NSF will refer to the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service all complaints that fall within the jurisdiction of this part and contain all information necessary for further processing.
( b ) Both the complainant and the recipient shall participate in the mediation process to the extent necessary to reach an agreement or for a mediator to make an informed judgement that an agreement is not possible. NSF will take no further administrative action on any complaint if the complainant refuses to participate in the mediation process.
( c ) If the complainant and the recipient reach an agreement, the mediator shall prepare a written statement of the agreement and have the complainant and recipient sign it. The mediator shall send a copy of the agreement to NSF. NSF shall take no further action on the complaint unless the complainant or the recipient fails to comply with the agreement, in which case the other party may request that the complaint be reopened.
( d ) The mediator shall protect the confidentiality of all information obtained in the course of the mediation process. No mediator shall testify in any adjudicative proceeding, produce any document, or otherwise disclose any information obtained in the course of the mediation process without prior approval of the head of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.
( e ) NSF will use the mediation process for a maximum of 60 days after receiving a complaint. Mediation ends if: ( 1 ) 60 days elapse from the time NSF receives a sufficient complaint: *or*
( 2 ) Before the end of the 60 day period, an agreement is reached; *or*
( 3 ) Before the end of the 60 day period, the mediator determines that an agreement cannot be reached.
( f ) The mediator shall return unresolved complaints to NSF.