alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-604 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION 

Earth Sciences 

 Memorandum of Understanding 

Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and SAMOA 

Signed at Reston and Apia 

March 27 and June 4, 2009 

 with 

Annexes 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 SAMOA 

 Scientific Cooperation: Earth Sciences 

 Memorandum of understanding signed 

 at Reston and Apia March 27 and June 4, 2009; 

 Entered into force June 4, 2009. 

 With annexes.
§ 131.890 EPIRBs and SARTs. The name of the vessel must be plainly marked or painted on each Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon (EPIRB) and on each Search and Rescue Transmitter (SART), except on an EPIRB or SART— ( a ) In an inflatable liferaft; or
( b ) Permanently installed in a survival craft.
[CGD 82-004 and CGD 86-074, 62 FR 49340, Sept. 19, 1997, as amended by USCG-2010-0759, 75 FR 60003, Sept. 29, 2010]
#### ANNA E. FAGER, PLAINTIFF, v. EDWARD WOOTTON, DEFENDANT.

Decided November 9, 1929.

Before Gummeee, Chief Justice, and Justices Kalisch and Campbell.

Por the rule, *William, Charlton.*

*Contra, Edwin Field Crane (Albert S. Woodruff,*of counsel).

Pee Cueiam.

The plaintiff obtained a verdict in the Camden Circuit against the defendant, for the sum of twelve thousand dollars, for injuries sustained by her, as the result of being struck by *1009an automobile driven by the defendant, on a public highway in Ocean City.

The only ground upon which the judgment is assailed, is, that the amount of the verdict is excessive.

The plaintiff was seventy-four years of age, but according to the testimony, she was a very active woman. There was testimony in the case that about thirty years prior to the happening of the present injury she sustained an injury to her knee cap, and the circumstance that there never was a complete healing, left her with a slight limp.

The injury which she sustained in the accident was a painful one—a fracture of the right hip at the point where the shaft of the thigh bone makes a slight turn to go over and make the hip-joint. The injury is not only permanent, but painful in character.

There is testimony to the effect that about fifteen hundred dollars was expended for doctors, and that in the course of time more sums will be required to be expended because of the need of medical attendance; that she has become crippled, and for the last eight months preceding the trial, required the constant attention of medical aid, and is still unable to move about.

It further appears, in order to minimize expenses the plaintiff has taken up her residence at the Hahneman Hospital, Philadelphia, at a cost of $38.50 a week, which will be a continuous expense, include nursing and all medical attention, and treatments and doctors5 bills.

She is, in fact, rendered helpless, and will continue so, and the last years of her existence, which may be few, will bo filled with pain and suffering. She is entitled to have the means by which she can enable herself to move about. If she requires a nurse and wheel-chair so that she can do so, it will entail expense. We think, therefore, under all the circumstances the verdict is not excessive.

Rule is discharged, with costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Friday, April 13, 2007.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

Surveillance Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-1365 Filed 3-15-07; 4:43 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
§ 115.620 Description of the Alternative Hull Examination (AHE) Program for certain passenger vessels. The Alternative Hull Examination (AHE) Program provides you with an alternative to a drydock examination by allowing your vessel's hull to be examined while it remains afloat. If completed using only divers, this program has four steps: the application process, the preliminary examination, the pre-survey meeting, and the hull examination. If the vessel is already participating in the program or if a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) is used during the program, the preliminary exam step may be omitted. Once you complete these steps, the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI), will evaluate the results and accept the examination as a credit hull exam if the vessel is in satisfactory condition. If only divers are used for the underwater survey portion of the examination process, you may receive credit for a period of time such that subsequent AHEs would be conducted at intervals of twice in every five years, with no more than three years between any two AHEs. The OCMI may waive an underwater survey in accordance with § 115.655(d) provided that the interval does not exceed five years between any two underwater surveys. If an underwater ROV is used as the predominate method to examine the vessel's underwater hull plating, you may receive credit up to five years. At the end of this period, you may apply for further participation under the AHE Program. Note to § 115.620 :
The expected hull coverage when using an ROV must be at least 80 percent.
[USCG-2000-6858, 69 FR 47383, Aug. 5, 2004]
November 26, 2014

Docket FAA-2000-8180

Docket Management Facility

US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

West Building Ground Floor

Room W12-140

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Amended Extension of Exemption 5560

Dear Sir or Madam:

The Regional Airline Association (“RAA”), on behalf of its Part 135 member airlines,1 petitions 

pursuant to Sections 11.61 and 11.63 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) for an extension of 

Exemption 5560I, which is scheduled to expire on November 30, 2014. 

Exemption 5560I provides relief from 14 CFR §§ 61.3(a), 61.3(c) and 135.95(a). It permits the 

establishment of special procedures that enable an operator to issue to its flight crewmembers, on a 

temporary basis, confirmation of any required crewmember certificates based upon information 

contained in the operator's approved record system subject to certain conditions and limitations. 

Exemption 5560 has proved to be a useful device that benefits the commercial aviation industry and the 

flying public

Extending this exemption will not compromise or adversely affect safety, as the conditions and 

circumstances pertaining to safety and public interest, which warranted the grant of the original request 

and subsequent extensions, continue to exist. The approved procedures, encompassing the conditions 

and limitations established by previous grants, have been in use for over a decade with no known 

compromise of safety. It is also in the public interest as the exemption can prevent possible and 

unnecessary delays or cancellations of scheduled air service. For these reasons, Exemption 5560I 

should be extended.

1 AirNet Systems, Cape Air, Era Aviation, Grand Canyon Airlines/Scenic, Great Lakes Aviation, New England Airlines

1 of 3

 
In accordance with FAR 11.87, RAA requests that the requirement for publication and comment 

be waived. The renewal of this exemption is not a controversial issue and this petition does not seek to 

establish a precedent, rather would merely continue an accepted and established practice. Although 

RAA requests waiver of publication, a summary of this petition is attached as required by FAR 11.81.

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or require additional 

information. 

Respectfully submitted,

Stacey Bechdolt

Sr. Director, Safety & Technical Affairs

Regulatory Counsel

Regional Airline Association

2025 M Street, NW, Suite 800

Washington, DC 20036

202-367-1252

Bechdolt@raa.org

2 of 3
SUMMARY

Petitioner: Regional Airline Association.

Sections of 14 CFR Affected:

14 CFR 61.3(a)

14 CFR 61.3(c)

14 CFR 135.95(a)

Description of Relief Sought:

The Regional Airline Association petitions on behalf of its member airlines for an extension of 

Exemption 5560I. This exemption permits RAA Part 135 member airlines to establish special 

procedures that enable an air carrier to issue to its flight crewmembers, on a temporary basis, 

confirmation of any required crewmember certificate based on information contained in the carrier’s 

approved record system.

3 of 3
# C_2012013EN.01000501.xml

| 14.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/5

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 13 October 2011 — Laurence Prinz v Region Hannover

(Case C-523/11)

2012/C 13/09

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Hannover

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Laurence Prinz

Applicant:

Defendant: Region Hannover

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does it constitute a restriction of the right to freedom of movement and residence conferred on citizens of the European Union by Articles 20 and 21 TFEU, which is not justified under Community law, if pursuant to the Bundesausbildungsförderungsgesetz, a German national, who has her permanent residence in Germany and attends an education establishment in a Member State of the European Union, is only awarded an education grant for attending that education establishment abroad for one year because when she commenced her stay abroad she had not already had her permanent residence in Germany for at least three years?

---
89–006 

111TH CONGRESS REPT. 111–575 " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session Part 2 

CONSOLIDATED LAND, ENERGY, AND AQUATIC 

RESOURCES ACT OF 2010 

JULY 30, 2010.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of 

the Union and ordered to be printed 

Mr. RAHALL, from the Committee on Natural Resources, 

submitted the following 

SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT 

[To accompany H.R. 3534] 

In lieu of the earmark statement on page 125, insert the following: 

H.R. 3534 does not contain any congressional earmarks, limited 

tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits as defined in clause 9 of rule 

XXI. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with REPORTS
|EXHIBIT 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer ofBelcrestCapital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | theQuarterlyReport of the Fund on Form10-Qfor thequarterendedJune 30, 2006(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                               
|   



|Date:August 9, 2006
|-------------------



| | /s/Thomas E. Faust Jr.Thomas E. Faust Jr.Chief Executive Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENCY REGIONS 1595 Wynkoop Street DENVER, CO 80202-1129 Phone 800-227-8917 http://www.epa.gov/region08 

### AUG - 1 2012 Ref: 8P-AR CERTIFIED MAIL

- RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED & ELECTRONIC MAIL John McMichael Environmental Engineer XTO Energy, Inc. 810 Houston Street Ft. Worth, Texas 76102 RE: Actual Notice for Approval and Promulgation of Federal Implementation Plan for Oil andNatural Gas Production Facilities Dear Mr. McMichael, This isto notify you that the EPA has issued a temporary interim final rule promulgating a reservationspecific Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) in orderto regulate emissions from oil and natural gas production facilities located onthe Fort Berthold Indian Reservation (FBIR). The FIP includes basic air quality regulations for the protection ofcommunitiesin and adjacent to the FBIR. The FIPrequires owners and operators ofoil and natural gas production facilities to reduce emissions ofvolatile organic compounds emanating from well completions, recompletions, and production and storage operations. The agency proposed a reservation-specific FIP concurrently with this interim final rule. The rule is effective with this actual notice to XTO Energy, Inc. forpurposes ofenforcementbeginning at 5 p.m. (eastern daylight time) on August 3, 2012. We will accept comments onthe proposedrule for 45 days from the date ofpublication in the Federal Register. The EPA Administrator, LisaJackson, signed the interim final rule on August 1,2012, andthe agency is submitting it for publication inthe Federal Register (FR).A copy ofthe signed interim final rule is enclosed with this letter. The version ofthe enclosed rule serves as the official version for purposes ofcompliance until the interim final rule is published in the FR. Please referto the published version ina forthcoming FRpublication, which will appear onthe Government Printing Office's FDsys website (http://fdsys.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/home.action) and on Regulations.gov (http://www.regulations.gov) in DocketNo. EPA-R08-0AR-2012-0479. Ifyouhave any questions onthe interim final rule, please contact Deirdre Rothery at (303) 312-6431.

Carl Daly, Directo Air Program Enclosures

2
§ 143.230 Alarms and monitoring. ( a ) Each towing vessel must have a reliable means to provide notification when an emergency condition exists or an essential system develops problems that require attention. The following alarms must be provided: ( 1 ) Main engine low lubricating oil pressure;
( 2 ) Main engine high cooling water temperature;
( 3 ) Auxiliary generator engine low lubricating oil pressure;
( 4 ) Auxiliary generator engine high cooling water temperature;
( 5 ) High bilge levels;
( 6 ) Low hydraulic steering fluid levels, if applicable; and
( 7 ) Low fuel level, if fitted with a day tank.
( b ) Alarms must: ( 1 ) Be visible and audible at each operating station. The alarm located at the operating station may be a summary alarm; if the alarm at the operating station is a summary alarm, the specific alarm condition must be indicated at the machinery or bilge location;
( 2 ) Have a means to test actuation at each operating station or have a continuous self-monitoring alarm system which actuates if an alarm point fails or becomes disabled;
( 3 ) Continue until they are acknowledged; and
( 4 ) Not interfere with night vision at the operating station.
( c ) The following systems must be equipped with gauges at the machinery location: ( 1 ) Main engine lubricating oil pressure and main engine RPM;
( 2 ) Main engine cooling water temperature;
( 3 ) Auxiliary generator engine lubricating oil pressure and auxiliary generator engine RPM;
( 4 ) Auxiliary generator engine cooling water temperature; and
( 5 ) Hydraulic steering fluid pressure, if the vessel is equipped with hydraulic steering systems.
# AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES

March 5 , 2013

Esta Rosenberg, Chief

U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Office of International Aviation

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: American Eagle Airlines, Inc., Small Aircraft Service

Between Dallas/Ft. Worth and t wo additional points in

Mexico (DOT

- OST

- 2011

- 0076)

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

American Eagle has compl e ted i ts polling of the carrier parties

served with our February 28 request to p rovide scheduled foreign

air transportation of persons, property, and mail between

Dallas/Ft

. Worth, Texas and H ermosillo, Mexico and Zacatecas,

Mexico using small aircraft

.

We have received non

- obj ections from each of the carrier pa rties

we served . We request expedited approval of our request

.

Respectfully submitted,

___________________________ Francis C. Heil

Senior Attorney

American Airlines, Inc.

1101 17 th Street, N.W.

Suite 600

Washington, D.C. 20036

(202) 496

- 5642

francis.heil@aa.com

cc: Paul Gretch

Brett Kruger

Brian Hedberg

Service list**Service List**

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing

document by email on the following persons:

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

jhill@dowlohnes.com

robert.land@jetblue.com

dan.weiss@united.com

bob.kneisley@wnco.com

jyoung@yklaw.com

cdonley@ssd.com

gmurphy@crowell.com

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com

howard.kass@usairways.com

anita.mosner@hklaw.com

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com

Chris.pappaioanou@mesa

- air.com

Patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com

urskr@state.gov

________________________________ Francis C. Heil

Mar c h 5 , 2013
§ 159.010-11 Changes in the laboratory's qualifications. ( a ) If any of the information submitted under § 159.010-5(a) changes, the laboratory shall notify the Commandant in writing of each change within 30 days after the change has occurred.
( b ) If any change in the independent laboratory occurs which affects its performance under the MOU required under § 159.010-7, the laboratory shall notify the Commandant in writing within 30 days after the change occurs. The Commandant may terminate the MOU, or may require amendments or revisions.
[CGD 93-055, 61 FR 13929, Mar. 28, 1996]
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.1820 Shipping document. No person may operate a vessel without carrying a shipping document in the wheelhouse that lists for each cargo on board: ( a ) The cargo tank in which the cargo is stowed;
( b ) The name of the shipper;
( c ) The location of the loading terminal;
( d ) The cargo name as listed in Table 4; and
( e ) The approximate quantity of the cargo.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2186 

To extend the supplemental security income program to American Samoa. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2009 

Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the supplemental security income program to 

American Samoa. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE SSI PROGRAM TO AMER4 ICAN SAMOA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1101(a)(1) of the Social 

6 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1301(a)(1)) is amended in the 

7 last sentence by inserting ‘‘and title XVI (as in effect pur8 suant to such amendment after December 31, 1973)’’ 

9 after ‘‘title IV’’. 

10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 1614(e) of 

11 such Act (42 U.S.C. 1382c(e)) is amended by striking 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2186 IH

1 ‘‘States and the District of Columbia’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘States, the District of Columbia, and American Samoa’’. 

3 (c) PROGRAM REVIEW.—The Commissioner of Social 

4 Security shall provide for the review of the carrying out 

5 in American Samoa of the supplemental security income 

6 program under title XVI of the Social Security Act. 

7 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

8 this section shall take effect on the 1st day of the 1st cal9 endar month that begins after the 180-day period that be10 gins with the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 21


                             SUPERIOR SERVICES, INC.
                                  SUBSIDIARIES
                             As of December 31, 1996

                                                
                                                Jurisdiction
                                                     of           Percent
                          Name                  Incorporation    Ownership


     Valley Sanitation Co., Inc.                 Wisconsin        100.0%
   
     Superior Services of Elgin, Inc.             Illinois        100.0%

     Superior of Wisconsin, Inc.                 Wisconsin        100.0%

     Superior Special Services, Inc.             Wisconsin        100.0%
  
     Superior Glacier Ridge, Inc.                Wisconsin        100.0%

     Land & Gas Reclamation, Inc.                Wisconsin        100.0%

     Superior Emerald Park Landfill, Inc.        Wisconsin        100.0%

     Superior Cranberry Creek Landfill, Inc.     Wisconsin        100.0%

     Superior Construction Services, Inc.        Wisconsin        100.0%

     Sharps Incinerator of Fort, Inc.            Wisconsin        100.0%

 **  Summit, Inc.                                Wisconsin        100.0%

 **  Hardrock, Inc.                              Wisconsin        100.0%

     Superior FCR Landfill, Inc.                 Minnesota        100.0%

     Superior Oak Ridge Landfill, Inc.            Missouri        100.0%
 
     Superior Seven Mile Creek Landfill, Inc.    Wisconsin        100.0%

     Superior of Missouri, Inc.                   Missouri        100.0%

     ____________________
 **  Second-tier subsidiaries