alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George G. Andrews, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 15, 2005



/s/ George G. AndrewsGeorge G. Andrews, President and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)
21st Century
Holding Company





EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT





In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of 21st Century
Holding Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Michael H. Braun, Chief
Executive Officer of 21st Century
Holding Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 21st
      Century Holding Company.





By:/s/ Michael H.
      BraunMichael
      H. Braun, Chief Executive Officer
              May
      11, 2009
#### § 95.11 Payment of claims subject to appropriations restrictions.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Subpart, we will pay States' otherwise allowable claims for Federal financial participation under the programs covered by this subpart, subject to the availability of funds (as provided in Acts appropriating funds to the Department in effect at the time in which such claims are being considered for payment), and subject to conditions or restrictions applicable to payments out of such funds, including provisions of the first and second continuing resolutions for FY 1981 (Pub. L. 96-369 and Pub. L. 96-536) and the Supplemental Appropriations and Rescission Act, 1981 (Pub. L. 97-12) that make funds under those Acts available to pay for a State agency expenditure made before September 30, 1978, only if the State had filed a claim for that expenditure with us within one year of the expenditure.

(Pub. L. 96-369, 94 Stat. 1351; Pub. L. 96-536, 94 Stat. 3166; and Pub. L. 97-12, 95 Stat. 14)

[46 FR 46136, Sept. 17, 1981]
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.460 Fire protection systems. Each self-propelled ship and each manned non-self-propelled ship must meet the following: ( a ) With the exception of the vent riser, each part of a cargo containment system exposed on the weatherdeck must be covered by the fire protection system listed beside the cargo in Table 1 and described in the footnotes to Table 1.
( b ) The Commandant (CG-ENG) approves the substitution of a dry chemical (D) type fire protection system for an A or B type on a case by case basis.
( c ) A fire protection system required by this part must meet part 34 of this chapter or be specifically approved by the Commandant (CG-ENG).
[CGD 73-96, 42 FR 49027, Sept. 26, 1977, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4782, Feb. 3, 1983; CGD 81-101, 52 FR 7781, Mar. 12, 1987]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****National compensation survey.State and local government. Brainerd, MN.**
 
SuDoc Number:L 2.121/57:B 73/

Item Number:0768-B-55 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000862341
 
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010
 
March 24, 2020
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.058-4 Inspections. ( a ) Desalter kits specified by this subpart are not inspected at regularly scheduled factory inspections; however, the Commander of the Coast Guard District in which the desalter kits are manufactured may detail a marine inspector at any time to visit places where desalter kits are manufactured to check materials and construction methods and to satisfy himself that the desalter kits are being manufactured in compliance with the requirements of the specification listed in § 160.058-1(a)(1) as modified by this specification and are suitable for the intended purpose. The manufacturer shall admit the marine inspector to his plant and shall provide a suitable place and the necessary apparatus for the use of the marine inspector in conducting tests at the place of manufacture.
( b ) [Reserved]
§ 95.515 Effective date of a cost allocation plan amendment. As a general rule, the effective date of a cost allocation plan amendment shall be the first day of the calendar quarter following the date of the event that required the amendment (See § 95.509). However, the effective date of the amendment may be earlier or later under the following conditions: ( a ) An earlier date is needed to avoid a significant inequity to either the State or the Federal Government.
( b ) The information provided by the State which was used to approve a previous plan or plan amendment is later found to be materially incomplete or inaccurate, or the previously approved plan is later found to violate a Federal statute or regulation. In either situation, the effective date of any required modification to the plan will be the same as the effective date of the plan or plan amendment that contained the defect.
( c ) It is impractical for the State to implement the amendment on the first day of the next calendar quarter. In these instances, a later date may be established by agreement between the State and the DCA.
§ 122.304 Navigation underway. ( a ) The movement of a vessel shall be under the direction and control of the master or a licensed mate at all times. The master shall operate the vessel keeping the safety of the passengers and crew foremost in mind by directing the vessel in order to prevent a casualty. Special attention should be paid to: ( 1 ) The current(s) velocity and direction of the transmitting area;
( 2 ) Tidal state;
( 3 ) Prevailing and forecasted visibility and environmental conditions, including wind and waves;
( 4 ) Density of marine traffic;
( 5 ) Potential damage caused by own wake;
( 6 ) The danger of each closing visual or radar contact;
( 7 ) Vessel's handling characteristics; and
( 8 ) Magnetic variation and deviation errors of the compass.
( b ) [Reserved]
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 935, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended by 62 FR 51352, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2007-0030, 75 FR 78082, Dec. 14, 2010; USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58283, Sept. 10, 2014]
§ 140.625 Navigation underway. ( a ) At all times, the movement of a towing vessel and its tow must be under the direction and control of a master or mate (pilot) properly licensed under subchapter B of this chapter.
( b ) The master or officer in charge of a navigational watch must operate the vessel in accordance with the conditions and restrictions stated on the COI and the TSMS applicable to the vessel.
Note to § 140.625. Certain towing vessels subject to § 140.625 are also subject to the requirements of 33 CFR 164.78.
2:14-cr-20494-GCS-PJK Doc # 11 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 1 of 21 Pg ID 27
2:14-cr-20494-GCS-PJK Doc # 11 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 2 of 21 Pg ID 28
2:14-cr-20494-GCS-PJK Doc # 11 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 3 of 21 Pg ID 29
2:14-cr-20494-GCS-PJK Doc # 11 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 4 of 21 Pg ID 30
2:14-cr-20494-GCS-PJK Doc # 11 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 5 of 21 Pg ID 31
2:14-cr-20494-GCS-PJK Doc # 11 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 6 of 21 Pg ID 32
2:14-cr-20494-GCS-PJK Doc # 11 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 7 of 21 Pg ID 33
2:14-cr-20494-GCS-PJK Doc # 11 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 8 of 21 Pg ID 34
2:14-cr-20494-GCS-PJK Doc # 11 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 9 of 21 Pg ID 35
2:14-cr-20494-GCS-PJK Doc # 11 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 10 of 21 Pg ID 36
2:14-cr-20494-GCS-PJK Doc # 11 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 11 of 21 Pg ID 37
2:14-cr-20494-GCS-PJK Doc # 11 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 12 of 21 Pg ID 38
2:14-cr-20494-GCS-PJK Doc # 11 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 13 of 21 Pg ID 39
2:14-cr-20494-GCS-PJK Doc # 11 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 14 of 21 Pg ID 40
2:14-cr-20494-GCS-PJK Doc # 11 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 15 of 21 Pg ID 41
2:14-cr-20494-GCS-PJK Doc # 11 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 16 of 21 Pg ID 42
2:14-cr-20494-GCS-PJK Doc # 11 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 17 of 21 Pg ID 43
2:14-cr-20494-GCS-PJK Doc # 11 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 18 of 21 Pg ID 44
2:14-cr-20494-GCS-PJK Doc # 11 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 19 of 21 Pg ID 45
2:14-cr-20494-GCS-PJK Doc # 11 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 20 of 21 Pg ID 46
2:14-cr-20494-GCS-PJK Doc # 11 Filed 10/08/14 Pg 21 of 21 Pg ID 47
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

Editorial Note on Subpart 151.50 of Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart 151.50 of part 151 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, and CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996.

§ 151.50-77 Fluorosilicic acid (30% or less) (hydrofluorosilicic acid). ( a ) Hydrofluorosilicic acid must be carried in gravity or pressure type cargo tanks independent of the vessel's structure. The tanks must be lined with rubber or other equally suitable material approved by the Commandant (CG-ENG). See § 151.15-3(f)(2).
( b ) Notwithstanding the provisions of § 151.50-20(b)(3), no compressed air may be used to discharge hydrofluorosilicic acid from gravity type cargo tanks unless: ( 1 ) The tanks are of cylindrical shape with dished heads, and
( 2 ) The air pressure does not exceed: ( i ) The design pressure of the tank, and
( ii ) 10 pounds per square inch gauge. The tanks must be fitted with pressure relief devices.
( c ) During cargo transfer, a water hose must be connected to a water supply and be ready for immediate use. Any leakage or spillage of acid must be immediately washed down. This requirement can be met by facilities provided from shore.
[CGD 80-001, 46 FR 63279, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4781, Feb. 3, 1983; CGD 92-100, 59 FR 17028, Apr. 11, 1994]
- 1 - Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

March 8, 2011

via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Joint Application of Delta/Alitalia/Pinnacle
For a Statement of Authorization
Docket DOT-OST-2001-10417

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all carriers on the service list to the above referenced application filed earlier today and there are no objections. In these circumstances, we urge that the application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

cc: Megan Rosia, Counsel for Pinnacle Richard Mathias, Counsel for Alitalia David Endersbee, Counsel for Alitalia
info@airlineinfo.com
# C_2011226EN.01001801.xml

| 30.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/18

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Ireland (Ireland) made on 6 June 2011 — MM v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Ireland, Attorney General

(Case C-277/11)

2011/C 226/34

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

High Court of Ireland

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: MM

Applicant:

Defendants: Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Ireland, Attorney General

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

| 1. | In a case where an applicant seeks subsidiary protection status following a refusal to grant refugee status and it is proposed that such an application should be refused, does the requirement to cooperate with an applicant imposed on a Member State in Article 4(1) of Council Directive 2004/83/EC (1) require the administrative authorities of the Member State in question to supply such applicant with the results of such an assessment before a decision is finally made so as to enable him or her to address those aspects of the proposed decision which suggest a negative result? |
| --- | --- |

1.

In a case where an applicant seeks subsidiary protection status following a refusal to grant refugee status and it is proposed that such an application should be refused, does the requirement to cooperate with an applicant imposed on a Member State in Article 4(1) of Council Directive 2004/83/EC (1) require the administrative authorities of the Member State in question to supply such applicant with the results of such an assessment before a decision is finally made so as to enable him or her to address those aspects of the proposed decision which suggest a negative result?

1

---

(1)  OJ L 304, p. 12

1

---
Editorial Note on Subpart 113.25 of Part 113
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart 113.25 of part 113 appear by CGD-94-108, 61 FR 28288, June 4, 1996.

§ 113.25-7 Power supply overcurrent protection. ( a ) If the general emergency alarm system is the only load supplied by the general emergency alarm system battery or batteries, the battery or batteries must have an enclosed fused switch or circuit breaker that has a means of locking. The fused switched or circuit breaker must be outside of, and next to, the battery room or battery locker, and the capacity of the fuses or circuit breaker must be at least 200 percent of the connected load.
( b ) If the general emergency alarm system is supplied from an emergency or interior communication switchboard, or if duplicate general alarm batteries supply other loads, there must be a fused switch or circuit breaker supplying the general emergency alarm system that has a means of locking.
[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15272, Apr. 8, 1982, as amended by USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16369, Mar. 16, 2023]
# C_2013252EN.01005001.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/50

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 30 May 2013 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case F-141/11) (1)

1

(Civil service - Article 34(1) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure - Application lodged by fax within the time-limit for bringing proceedings - Handwritten signature on the fax different from that on the original application received by post - Action lodged out of time - Manifestly inadmissible)

2013/C 252/90

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser, J. Banquero Cruz, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s implied decision refusing the applicant’s claim for payment of arrears if remuneration owing for the period from September to December 2010 and January 2011.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Marcuccio is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 3.3.2012, p. 25.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2191 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2191

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 34 A Street NE. in Miami, Oklahoma, as the ``Steve Owens Post Office 
                              Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 30, 2009

  Mr. Boren (for himself, Mr. Cole, Mr. Sullivan, Ms. Fallin, and Mr. 
    Lucas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 34 A Street NE. in Miami, Oklahoma, as the ``Steve Owens Post Office 
                              Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STEVE OWENS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 34 A Street NE. in Miami, Oklahoma, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Steve Owens Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Steve 
Owens Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2011269EN.01002601.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/26

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 15 June 2011 — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Gemeente Vlaardingen

(Case C-299/11)

2011/C 269/48

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Applicant:

Defendant: Gemeente Vlaardingen

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 5(7)(a) of the Sixth Directive, (1) read in conjunction with Article 5(5) and Article 11(A)(1)(b) of the Sixth Directive, be interpreted as meaning that, upon the occupation of immovable property by a taxable person for exempt purposes, a Member State may charge VAT in a case where:

1

| — | that immovable property consists of a (building) work completed on the taxable person’s own land and to his own order by a third person for consideration, and |
| --- | --- |

—

that immovable property consists of a (building) work completed on the taxable person’s own land and to his own order by a third person for consideration, and

| — | that land was previously used by the taxable person for (the same) exempt business purposes, and the taxable person did not previously enjoy a VAT deduction in respect of that same land, |
| --- | --- |

—

that land was previously used by the taxable person for (the same) exempt business purposes, and the taxable person did not previously enjoy a VAT deduction in respect of that same land,

with the result that (the value of that) same land becomes included in the VAT charge?

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1).

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                         PROTALIX BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

In connection  with the periodic report of Protalix  BioTherapeutics,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Yossi  Maimon,  Vice
President and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  hereby certify as of the
date hereof,  solely for the purposes of Title 18,  Chapter 63,  Section 1350 of
the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

      This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: March 28, 2007

/s/ Yossi Maimon
------------------------------------------------
Yossi Maimon
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 164
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 164 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 164.019-5 Standard components; acceptance criteria and procedures. ( a ) *General.* Standard components used in the construction of PFDs must meet the applicable requirements of this part or part 160 and the documentation requirements of this section.
( b ) *Use Codes.* Each standard component is assigned a Use Code as indicated in table 164.019-3. Additional Use Codes may be assigned by the Commandant.
( c ) *Method and documentation of acceptance.* Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, the following requirements pertaining to the shipment of standard components must be met in order for the standard components to be considered Coast Guard-accepted standard components: ( 1 ) Each shipment of standard components must be accompanied by an affidavit complying with § 164.019-11.
( 2 ) A sample affidavit, or a copy of the affidavit, provided with the first shipment of standard components to a PFD manufacturer, must be provided to the Commandant.
( 3 ) A revised sample affidavit, or a copy of the revised affidavit, must be provided to the Coast Guard any time the information on the affidavit accompanying a shipment of standard components materially changes.
( d ) *Exception.* Affidavits are not required to be provided for standard components that are under the quality control oversight program of a recognized laboratory meeting the requirements of § 164.019-17.
( e ) *Suspension or termination of acceptance.* The procedures in §§ 2.75-40 and 2.75-50 of this chapter for suspension and termination of approvals also apply to Coast Guard acceptances of PFD components.