alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.18
 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
OF
NEXTERA ENTERPRISES, INC.
(Independent Director)
 Company   Optionee
      DEFINITIONS
  Section 1.1 Agreement
 Agreement
 Section 1.2 Option
 Option
 Section 1.3 Plan
 Plan




---



##### 



GRANT OF OPTION
 Section 2.1 Grant of Option
 
 Section 2.2 Purchase Price
 
 Section 2.3 Grant Date
 Grant Date
  PERIOD OF EXERCISABILITY
 Section 3.1 Commencement of Exercisability
       2




---



##### 



Section 3.2 Duration of Exercisability
  Section 3.3 Expiration of Option
      Section 3.4 Acceleration of Exercisability
   EXERCISE OF OPTION
 Section 4.1 Person Eligible to Exercise
  Section 4.2 Partial Exercise
  3




---



##### 



Section 4.3 Manner of Exercise
  Exhibit A
     provided however
   Section 4.4 Conditions to Issuance of Stock Certificates
  4




---



##### 



Section 4.5 Rights as Stockholder
   OTHER PROVISIONS
 Section 5.1 Administration
  Section 5.2 Option Not Transferable
  5




---



##### 



Section 5.3 Shares to Be Reserved
  Section 5.4 Notices
  Section 5.5 Titles
  Section 5.6 Construction
  Section 5.7 Conformity to Securities Laws
  6




---



##### 



Section 5.8 Amendments
  Section 5.9 Incorporation of Plan
   
 NEXTERA ENTERPRISES, INC.,
a Delaware corporationByName:Title:Print Name:OptioneeAddress
 7




---



##### 



Exhibit A
 NEXTERA ENTERPRISES, INC.
NOTICE OF EXERCISE OF OPTION
 
  Type of
    
    Date
    
    Number of
    
    Option
    
    PaymentOption
    
    Granted
    
    Shares
    
    Price
    
    DueX
    
    =
  
  
  
 
 
 Date
    
    Optionees Signature
 INSIDER TRADING (Section 10b-5) REMINDERS
 You may be subject to additional legal restrictions and requirements. Contact the Companys legal
counsel with any questions.
# C_2011252EN.01002301.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/23

---

Action brought on 17 June 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Finland

(Case C-309/11)

2011/C 252/43

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: I. Koskinen and L. Lozano Palacios, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Finland

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by applying, in Paragraph 80 of Law on value added tax (1501/1993), the special scheme for travel agents to travel services sold to persons other than travellers, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 306 to 310 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1); |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by applying, in Paragraph 80 of Law on value added tax (1501/1993), the special scheme for travel agents to travel services sold to persons other than travellers, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 306 to 310 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1);

1

| — | order Republic of Finland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Republic of Finland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission observes that the special scheme for travel agents in Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax is to be applied only when travel services are sold to travellers. The Republic of Finland has infringed that directive by applying the special scheme for travel agents to services which travel agencies supply to one another or to tour operators.

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1

1

---
Exhibit 12.2

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Hansine Ullberg, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Birch Mountain Resources Ltd.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statement, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the annual report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting  and;

5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);

a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 24, 2006

Hansine M. Ullberg

Hansine M. Ullberg,

Vice-President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(e) and 37 CFR 404.7(a)(I)(i), announcement is made of the intent to grant an exclusive, royalty-bearing, revocable license to U.S. provisional patent application filed January 15, 2007 entitled “Identification of Small Molecule Inhibitors of Filovirus Replication,” to Functional Genetics, with its principal place of business at 708 Quince Orchard Rd., Gaithersburg, MD 20878.

# ADDRESSES:

Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, ATTN: Command Judge Advocate, MCMR-ZA-J, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD 21702-5012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For licensing issues, Dr. Paul Mele, Office of Research & Technology Assessment, (301) 619-6664. For patent issues, Ms. Elizabeth Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619-7808, both at telefax (301) 619-5034.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license can file written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, 15 days from the date of this publication. Written objections are to be filed with the Command Judge Advocate (see                     **ADDRESSES**                    .)                

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-1743  Filed 4-6-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains financial information extracted from Balance Sheet,
Statement of Operations, Statement of Cash Flows and Notes thereto incorporated
in Part II, Item 7. of this Form 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          41,651
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    303,233
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               359,874
<PP&E>                                          15,251
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 688,270
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,558,162
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,672
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,641,548
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   688,270
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,673,064
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,193,254
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,866,318)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                               (158,776)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,025,094)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.34)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 46 (Friday, March 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1114]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. 
The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential 
trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, CTSA Supplemental Review.
    Date: March 27, 2007.
    Time: 9:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hotel Lombardy, 2019 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC 
20006.
    Contact Person: Robin L. Strickland, Extramural Support 
Assistant, Extramural Support Assistant, Division of Scientific 
Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6915, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7b080f09121810171a151f093b161a121755151213551c140d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="344740465d575f58555a50467459555d581a5a5d5c1a535b42">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 5, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1114 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Erica Blumenthal

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 00130

- CV

Trial court case number: 2020

- 62226

Trial court: 280th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, E ric a Blumenthal, filed a Petition for Original Writ of Habeas Corpu s and a

corresponding M otion for T emporary R elief to S tay Proceed ings and to Set Bond seeking to stay

enforcement of a March 10, 202 1 criminal contempt order . Becau se appellant did not inc lude a

signed criminal co ntempt order in her a p p endix , we have nothing to review. We de n y the

Motion for Temporary Relief without prejudice to its refiling upon the fil in g of the signed

co ntemp t order

.

It is so ORD ERED.

Judge’s signature:

_________ /s/ Veronica Rivas

- Molloy

_____ Acting individually

Date: March 12, 2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

REBECCA MALONE O/B/O

H.M., a minor,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 15-CV-10226

vs. HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

MAG. JUDGE ANTHONY P. PATTI

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant.

___________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE

JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [DOC. 23]

This matter is before the court on the parties' cross-motions for summary

judgment as to plaintiff Rebecca Malone’s claim for judicial review of defendant

Commissioner of Social Security's (“Commissioner”) denial of her application for

supplemental security income on her minor child H.M.’s behalf. Magistrate Judge Patti

issued a report and recommendation recommending that plaintiff's motion for summary

judgment be granted, defendant’s motion for summary judgment be denied, the

Commissioner’s non-disability finding be reversed, and this matter be remanded to the

Commissioner and the ALJ under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 

The court has reviewed the file, record, and magistrate judge's report and

recommendation. Objections to that report have not been filed by either party and the

time period for doing so has expired. The failure to file objections to a report and

recommendation generally constitutes a waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of

-1-

2:15-cv-10226-GCS-APP Doc # 24 Filed 01/05/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 583
the district court. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985); Alspaugh v. McConnell,

643 F.3d 162, 166 (6th Cir. 2011). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the magistrate

judge's report and recommendation (Doc. 23).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc.

18) is GRANTED and the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 21) is

DENIED for the reasons set forth in the report and recommendation. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioner’s non-disability finding is

REVERSED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be remanded to the Commissioner

pursuant to sentence four of § 405(g) for further proceedings (1) to consider H.M.’s

impairments with respect to the domain of “caring for yourself,” and (2) to clarify or

further develop the analysis of H.M.’s impairments in the domain of interacting and

relating with others. 

Dated: January 5, 2016

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

January 5, 2016, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marcia Beauchemin

Deputy Clerk

-2-

2:15-cv-10226-GCS-APP Doc # 24 Filed 01/05/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 584
<PAGE>

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                     TO THE
                        LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATION LTD.
                             1996 STOCK OPTION PLAN
                            (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED)

                  WHEREAS, Loral Space & Communications Ltd. (the "Company"),
currently maintains and sponsors the Loral Space & Communications Ltd. 1996
Stock Option Plan (As Amended and Restated) (the "Plan"); and

                  WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the "Board")
has the power to amend the Plan pursuant to Section 10(b) of the Plan and now
wishes to do so.

                  NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

                  1.       By adding new subsection (i) to Section 5 of the Plan
                           to read as follows:

                  (i)      Either the Board of Directors or the Committee, in
                  its discretion, may conduct exchange offers with respect to
                  outstanding Options with a purchase price greater than the
                  Fair Market Value on the date of the exchange offer; provided,
                  that any such exchange offer does not result in a "repricing"
                  under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

                  2.       Except as modified by this Amendment No. 1, all of
the terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain valid and in full force and
effect.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer
of the Company, has executed this instrument as of the 17th day of December,
2002, on behalf of the Board.

                                    By: /s/ Avi Katz
                                        ------------------
                                        Name:  Avi Katz
                                        Title: Vice President, General
                                               Counsel and Secretary
**EXHIBIT32.1**

** **

** **

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

** **

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of First Federal Bancshares ofArkansas, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), theundersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

a)              The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

b)             The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of and forthe period covered by the Report.

 

 
| Date:  | February 26,  2008 | /s/ Larry J. Brandt                      |
|-------------|-------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|        |                    | Larry J. Brandt

Chief Executive Officer |
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.1440 Antidotes.

Each vessel must have the antidotes prescribed in the *IMO Medical First Aid Guide for Use in Accidents Involving Dangerous Goods,* printed by IMO, London, U.K. for the cargoes being carried.
#### Tugwell, appellant, v. Bussing.

*Execution*— *sale in parcels.*

While a sheriff is hound to sell personal property levied upon by virtue of an execution and capable of being so sold, in parcels, the existence of .chattel mortgages upon such property would present a .different question as to his duty in selling. 4 Denio, 171; 28 How. 12.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant at the circuit. The action was brought in Westchester county by Mary E. Tug-well, administratrix of Noah Tugwell, deceased, against John Bussing, late sheriff of said county, to recover damages for selling property levied upon under execution altogether instead of in parcels.

*Geo. W. Rathbun*and *Wm. W. Mann,*for appellant.

*Close & Robertson,*for respondent.

Talcott, J.

There is nothing material for publication in the opinion.

*New trial ordered.*
# C_2012184EN.01001201.xml

| 23.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/12

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2012 — Mizuno v OHIM — Golfino (G)

(Case T-101/11) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark G - Earlier Community figurative mark G+ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 184/20

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mizuno KK (Osaka, Japan) (represented by: T. Raab and H.R. Lauf, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented: initially by R. Manea and subsequently by D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Golfino AG (Glinde, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 December 2010 (Case R 821/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Golfino AG and Mizuno KK

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mizuno KK to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mizuno KK to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 120, 16.4.2011.

1

---