alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2169 

To limit Federal spending to a percentage of GDP. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 29, 2009 

Mr. DUNCAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for 

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To limit Federal spending to a percentage of GDP. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Limitation on Govern5 ment Spending Act of 2009’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMIT ON FEDERAL SPENDING. 

7 (a) DEFINITION.—Section 3 of the Congressional 

8 Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 622) is amended by insert9 ing at the end the following: 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2169 IH

1 ‘‘(11) FEDERAL SPENDING LIMIT.—The term 

2 ‘Federal spending limit’ means— 

3 ‘‘(A) with respect to fiscal year 2011, out4 lays not exceeding 22 per cent of the GDP; 

5 ‘‘(B) with respect to fiscal year 2012, out6 lays not exceeding 21 per cent of the GDP; and 

7 ‘‘(C) with respect to fiscal year 2013 and 

8 fiscal years thereafter, outlays not exceeding 20 

9 per cent of the GDP. 

10 ‘‘(12) GDP.—The term ‘GDP’ means the gross 

11 domestic product for the relevant fiscal year as most 

12 recently estimated by CBO.’’. 

13 (b) FEDERAL SPENDING LIMIT POINT OF ORDER.— 

14 Section 311 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 

15 U.S.C. 642) is amended by inserting at the end the fol16 lowing: 

17 ‘‘(d) FEDERAL SPENDING LIMIT POINT OF

18 ORDER.— 

19 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—It shall not be in order in 

20 the Senate or the House of Representatives to con21 sider any bill, joint resolution, amendment, or con22 ference report that includes any provision that would 

23 result in a deficit for a fiscal year that exceeds the 

24 maximum deficit amount or Federal spending limit, 

25 as applicable, for such fiscal year. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2169 IH

1 ‘‘(2) WAIVER OR SUSPENSION.—This subsection 

2 may be waived or suspended in the Senate only by 

3 the affirmative roll call vote of three-fifths of the 

4 Members, duly chosen and sworn. 

5 ‘‘(3) APPEALS.—Appeals in the Senate from 

6 the decisions of the Chair relating to any provision 

7 of this subsection shall be limited to 1 hour, to be 

8 equally divided between, and controlled by, the ap9 pellant and the manager of the bill or joint resolu10 tion. An affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Mem11 bers of the Senate, duly chosen and sworn, shall be 

12 required to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the 

13 Chair on a point of order raised under this sub14 section.’’. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MICHIGAN LABORERS’ 

PENSION FUND, 

 Plaintiffs, Case No. 14-cv-14142 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

RITE WAY FENCE, INC. et al., 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (ECF #90) 

 On January 17, 2017, Plaintiff the Michigan Laborers’ Pension Fund filed a 

motion for summary judgment on its claims against Defendants Rite Way Fence, 

Inc., Marx Contracting, Inc., H & H Rentals, LLC, and Eugene Zapczynski. (See 

ECF #75.) The Court held a hearing on the Fund’s motion on May 3, 2017. For the 

reasons explained on the record during the hearing, the Court granted the motion 

with respect to Defendants Rite Way. Marx, and H&H and denied the motion with 

respect to Defendant Zapczynski. (See ECF #89.) 

 On May 17, 2017, the Fund filed a Motion for Reconsideration. (See ECF 

#90). The Fund’s reconsideration motion is DENIED because the Fund has not 

demonstrated a palpable defect by which the Court has been misled nor shown that 
2 

correcting such a defect (if it exists) would result in a different disposition of the 

case. See Local Rule 7.1(h). 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: May 31, 2017 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on May 31, 2017, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113
#### § 95.25 When to request a waiver for good cause.

The State should request a waiver in writing as soon as the State recognizes that it will be unable to submit a claim within the appropriate time limit.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1202 

TP 16-00742 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF SHANNON V. CAMPBELL, PETITIONER, 

V ORDER

ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, ACTING COMMISSIONER, 

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND 

COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT. 

 

SHANNON CAMPBELL, PETITIONER PRO SE.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (LAURA ETLINGER OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial

Department by order of the Supreme Court, Seneca County [Dennis F.

Bender, A.J.], entered May 2, 2016) to review a determination of

respondent. The determination found after a tier III hearing that

petitioner had violated an inmate rule. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously

confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed. 

Entered: December 23, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                            8953
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1030
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          189263
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            177170
<LOANS>                                         460730
<ALLOWANCE>                                        752
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  680719
<DEPOSITS>                                      507875
<SHORT-TERM>                                     68000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               9235
<LONG-TERM>                                      15972
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         26217
<OTHER-SE>                                       52598
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  680719
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  35537
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                11052
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   477
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 47066
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               24566
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               27799
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            19267
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       20
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  11594
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   9429
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        6280
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      6280
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.56
<LOANS-NON>                                       1347
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   1347
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   771
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       67
<RECOVERIES>                                        28
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  752
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               374
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            378


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

PATRICIA ROUSSETY

Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

 -vs- Case No. 14-11677

Hon. John Corbett O'Meara

NATIONAL CREDITORS CONNECTIONS, INC. ,

GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC,

Defendant.

__________________________________________/

JUDGMENT AGAINST NATIONAL CREDITORS CONNECTION, INC.

FOLLOWING RULE 68 OFFER

Pursuant to National Creditors Connection, Inc.’s (“NCCI”) Rule 68 Offer of

Judgment, the Court hereby enters judgment in favor of Patty Roussety against NCCI

in the amount of $20,000 along with reasonable costs and attorney fees incurred by

Plaintiff in connection with this action. Said costs and fees are to be in amount agreed

upon by counsel for the parties, or if they are unable to agree, as determined by

motion within 30 days of entry of this judgment. 

This Judgment resolves all Plaintiff’s claims against NCCI, with the exception

of resolution of costs and attorney fees referenced above. Ms. Roussety’s acceptance

Case 5:14-cv-11677-JCO-MJH ECF No. 39, PageID.165 Filed 04/02/15 Page 1 of 2
of NCCI’s Rule 68 offer in no way settles her claims against Green Tree Servicing,

LLC, or prejudices her in any way from pursuing her claims against Green Tree. 

SO ORDERED.

Date: April 2, 2015 s/John Corbett O’Meara

United States District Judge

Stipulated To By:

s/ Julie A. Petrik

Julie A. Petrik (P47131)

Attorney For Plaintiff

Lyngklip & Associates Consumer Law

Center, PLC

Southfield, MI 48075

 (248) 208-8864

Julie@MichiganConsumerLaw.Com

s/ by consent Randall J. Groendyk 

Randall J. Groendyk

Attorney for NCCI

Varnum LLC

Bridgewater Place

PO Box 352 

Grand Rapids, MI 49501

(616)336-6573

rgroendyk@varnumlaw.com

Case 5:14-cv-11677-JCO-MJH ECF No. 39, PageID.166 Filed 04/02/15 Page 2 of 2
§ 605.43 Treatment of students; general. ( a ) No qualified handicapped student shall, on the basis of handicap, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any academic, research, occupational training, housing, health insurance, counseling, financial aid, physical education, athletics, recreation, transportation, other extracurricular, or other postsecondary education aid, benefits, or services to which this subpart applies.
( b ) A recipient to which this subpart applies that considers participation by students in education programs or activities not operated wholly by the recipient as part of, or equivalent to, an education program or activity operated by the recipient shall assure itself that the other education program or activity, as a whole, provides an equal opportunity for the participation of qualified handicapped persons.
( c ) A recipient to which this subpart applies may not, on the basis of handicap, exclude any qualified handicapped student from any course, course of study, or other part of its education program or activity.
( d ) A recipient to which this subpart applies shall operate its program or activity in the most integrated setting appropriate.
[47 FR 8573, Mar. 1, 1982, as amended at 68 FR 51381, Aug. 26, 2003]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the fourth meeting of the American Health Information Community Personalized Healthcare Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.)

# DATES:

April 17, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time.

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer, Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090 (please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​healthcare/​.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Workgroup will discuss possible common data standards to incorporate interoperable, clinically useful genetic laboratory test data, family history information, and analytical tooks into Electronic Health Records (EHR) to support clinical decision-making for the health care provider and patient.  Instructions to participate via Web cast are posted at                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​healthcare/​phc_​instruct.html.*

Dated: March 26, 2007.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 07-1583 Filed 3-30-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The Financial Data Schedule for the Six Month Period Ended June 30, 1998 is
unaunaudited. It is suggested that it be read in conjunction with the Company's
Form 10-KSB Transition Report for the transition period from January 1, 1998 to
June 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             962
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      459
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          22,842
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,480
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            39
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,942
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,480
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,166
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,286)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,286)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.65)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Peter E. Williams III, Chief Financial Officer of Saba Software, Inc. (the Company)
hereby certify, as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: October 13, 2006



By:

/s/ PETER E. WILLIAMS IIIPeter E. Williams IIIChief Financial Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Thirteenth meeting of the UJNRPanel on Fire Research and Safety, March 13-20, 1996**
 
SuDoc Number:C 13.58:6030/V.1-2

Item Number:0247-D (online)
CGP systemNumber:000622298
 
Volumes: 0102
 
March 24, 2020
2:14-cv-13976-PDB-MKM Doc # 18 Filed 04/29/16 Pg 1 of 18 Pg ID 414
2:14-cv-13976-PDB-MKM Doc # 18 Filed 04/29/16 Pg 2 of 18 Pg ID 415
2:14-cv-13976-PDB-MKM Doc # 18 Filed 04/29/16 Pg 3 of 18 Pg ID 416
2:14-cv-13976-PDB-MKM Doc # 18 Filed 04/29/16 Pg 4 of 18 Pg ID 417
2:14-cv-13976-PDB-MKM Doc # 18 Filed 04/29/16 Pg 5 of 18 Pg ID 418
2:14-cv-13976-PDB-MKM Doc # 18 Filed 04/29/16 Pg 6 of 18 Pg ID 419
2:14-cv-13976-PDB-MKM Doc # 18 Filed 04/29/16 Pg 7 of 18 Pg ID 420
2:14-cv-13976-PDB-MKM Doc # 18 Filed 04/29/16 Pg 8 of 18 Pg ID 421
2:14-cv-13976-PDB-MKM Doc # 18 Filed 04/29/16 Pg 9 of 18 Pg ID 422
2:14-cv-13976-PDB-MKM Doc # 18 Filed 04/29/16 Pg 10 of 18 Pg ID 423
2:14-cv-13976-PDB-MKM Doc # 18 Filed 04/29/16 Pg 11 of 18 Pg ID 424
2:14-cv-13976-PDB-MKM Doc # 18 Filed 04/29/16 Pg 12 of 18 Pg ID 425
2:14-cv-13976-PDB-MKM Doc # 18 Filed 04/29/16 Pg 13 of 18 Pg ID 426
2:14-cv-13976-PDB-MKM Doc # 18 Filed 04/29/16 Pg 14 of 18 Pg ID 427
2:14-cv-13976-PDB-MKM Doc # 18 Filed 04/29/16 Pg 15 of 18 Pg ID 428
2:14-cv-13976-PDB-MKM Doc # 18 Filed 04/29/16 Pg 16 of 18 Pg ID 429
2:14-cv-13976-PDB-MKM Doc # 18 Filed 04/29/16 Pg 17 of 18 Pg ID 430
2:14-cv-13976-PDB-MKM Doc # 18 Filed 04/29/16 Pg 18 of 18 Pg ID 431
§ 144.800 Handrails and bulwarks. ( a ) Rails or equivalent protection must be installed near the periphery of all decks accessible to crew. Equivalent protection may include lifelines, wire rope, chains, and bulwarks that provide strength and support equivalent to fixed rails.
( b ) In areas where space limitations make deck rails impractical, such as at narrow catwalks in way of deckhouse sides, hand grabs may be substituted.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BIG GUY’S PINBALL, LLC,

Case No. 2:14-CV-14185-VAR-RSW

Plaintiff, 

Honorable VICTORIA A. ROBERTS

v. U.S. District Judge, Presiding 

JIMMY LIPHAM, Honorable R. STEVEN WHALEN

Exec. U.S. Magistrate Judge, Referral 

Defendant. 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

The parties having so stipulated by their respective counsel, the Court hereby ORDERS 

that Defendant JIMMY LIPHAM shall have until and through January 9, 2015 to answer 

Plaintiff BGP’s complaint, or to otherwise move as permitted by Fed.R.Civ.P.12 or other 

applicable law. Defendant’s motion (CM/ECF#15) is rendered moot by this Order. 

STIPULATION

Pursuant to E.D.Mich.L.R. 7.1(a)(1) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b)(1)(A) the parties, by their 

respective counsel, stipulate to the content and form of this Order. 

Counsel or Plaintiff: Counsel or Defendant: 

ROBERT A. FARR, PLLC WILLIAMS HUGHES, PLLC 

By: s/ Robert Farr * By: s/ Eric C. Grimm 

Robert A. Farr (P61597) Eric C. Grimm (P58990) 

December 16, 2014 December 16, 2014

* By Eric C. Grim (P58990) with Mr. Farr’s permission for the purpose of electronically 

 submitting this Stipulation and proposed Order to the Court via the CM/ECF system. 

2:14-cv-14185-VAR-RSW Doc # 17 Filed 12/18/14 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 182
EXHIBIT 12.1

                        DAWSON PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                                Years ended March 31,
                                                ---------------------
                                              1995     1996      1997
                                              ----     ----      ----
Earnings:
    Income before income taxes ...........   $1,742   $2,082   $ 8,420
Add back:
    Interest expense .....................      789    1,848     2,313
    Amortization of debt issuance cost ...     --       --          74
    Portion of rent expense representative
        of interest factor ...............       58       84       122
                                             ------   ------   -------
Earnings as adjusted .....................   $2,589   $4,014   $10,929
                                             ======   ======   =======

Fixed charges:
    Interest expense .....................   $  789   $1,848   $ 2,313
    Amortization of debt issuance cost ...     --       --          74
    Portion of rent expense representative
        of interest factor ...............       58       84       122
                                             ------   ------   -------
                                             $  847   $1,932   $ 2,509
                                             ======   ======   =======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges .......     3.1x     2.1x      4.4x
                                             ======   ======   =======
###### Editorial Note on Part 160

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 160.002-7 Procedure for approval.

*General.* Manufacturers seeking approval of a life preserver design shall follow the procedures of subpart 159.005 of this chapter, as explained in § 160.001-3 of this part.

[CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51211, Sept. 30, 1997]