alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 141.375 Visual distress signals. ( a ) *Carriage requirement.* A towing vessel must carry a combination of day and night visual distress signals indicated in Table 141.370 of § 141.370 for specified areas where the vessel operates.
( b ) *Day and night visual distress signals.* Hand-held red flare distress signals, approved under approval series 160.021 or 160.121, and hand-held rocket-propelled parachute red flares, approved under approval series 160.036 or 160.136, are acceptable as both day and night signals.
( c ) *Signals for day visual distress only.* Floating orange smoke signals, approved under approval series 160.022, 160.122, or 160.157, and hand-held orange smoke distress signals, approved under approval series 160.037, are only acceptable as day signals.
( d ) *Limited geographic area.* A vessel operating in a limited geographic area on a short run limited to approximately 30 minutes away from the dock is not required to carry visual distress signals under this section.
( e ) *Stowage.* Each pyrotechnic distress signal carried to meet this section must be stowed in either: ( 1 ) A portable watertight container carried at the operating station. Portable watertight containers for pyrotechnic distress signals must be of a bright color and must be clearly marked in legible contrasting letters at least 12.7 millimeters (0.5 inches) high with “DISTRESS SIGNALS”; or
( 2 ) A pyrotechnic locker secured above the freeboard deck, away from heat, in the vicinity of the operating station.
§ 16.205 Implementation of chemical testing programs. ( a ) When a vessel owned in the United States is operating in waters that are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, the testing requirements of §§ 16.210 and 16.230 do not apply to a citizen of a foreign country engaged or employed as pilot in accordance with the laws or customs of that foreign country.
( b ) Upon written request of an employer, Commandant (CG-INV) will review the employer's chemical testing program to determine compliance with the provisions of this part.
[CGD 90-014, 56 FR 60930, Nov. 29, 1991, as amended by 59 FR 62226, Dec. 2, 1994; CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50461, Sept. 29, 1995; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50726, Sept. 27, 1996; CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51196, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49225, Sept. 25, 2009]
2:02-cv-72357-BAF   Doc # 38   Filed 12/15/03   Pg 1 of 1    Pg ID 194
§ 163.002-1 Scope. ( a ) This subpart contains standards and approval and production tests for pilot hoists used on merchant vessels.
( b ) The requirements in this subpart apply to a pilot hoist designed for use along a vertical portion of a vessel's hull.
Editorial Note on Part 162
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 162 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 162.018-1 Applicable specifications, and referenced material. ( a ) There are no other specifications applicable to this subpart except as noted in this subpart.
( b ) The following referenced material from industry standards of the issue in effect on the date safety relief valves are manufactured shall form a part of the regulations of this subpart (see §§ 2.-75-17 through 2.75-19 of Subchapter A (Procedures Applicable to the Public) and Subpart 50.15 of Subchapter F (Marine Engineering) of this chapter): ( 1 ) ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) Code (see § 50.-15-5 of subchapter F (Marine Engineering) of this chapter): The following paragraph from section VIII of the ASME Code: (i) UG-131, flow rating of valves, see § 162.018-7(a).
( 2 ) CGA (Compressed Gas Association) standard: The following standard of the Compressed Gas Association (see § 50.15-20(a) of Subchapter F (Marine Engineering) of this chapter): (i) S-1.2.5.2, Flow test data for safety and relief valves for use on pressure vessels, see § 162.018-7(a).
( c ) A copy of this specification and the referenced material listed in this section, if used, shall be kept on file by the manufacturer, together with the approved plans, specifications, and certificate of approval. It is the manufacturer's responsibility to have the latest issue, including addenda and changes, of the referenced material on hand when manufacturing equipment under this subpart. ( 1 ) The ASME Code may be obtained from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, United Engineering Center, 345 East 47th Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.
( 2 ) The CGA standard may be obtained from the Compressed Gas Association, 500 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10036.
[CGFR 68-82, 33 FR 18908, Dec. 18, 1968]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      14,949,714
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,015,161
<ALLOWANCES>                                    32,847
<INVENTORY>                                  9,305,027
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,794,809
<PP&E>                                       7,310,740
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,603,107
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,376,342
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       104,410
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,713,231
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,603,107
<SALES>                                     39,143,625
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            48,590,978
<CGS>                                       25,937,445
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               39,782,654
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,159,404
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (475,805)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,124,725
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,369,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,755,525
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38


</TABLE>
|EXHIBIT 32.2
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Belcrest Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                       
|   



|Date: August 9, 2005
|--------------------



| | /s/ James L. O'ConnorJames L. O'ConnorChief Financial Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Motion denied; Order filed April 28, 2022 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00468-CV

____________

SCWYANA SMITH, Appellant

V.

ANKUS, L.L.C., Appellee

On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-52368

ABATEMENT ORDER

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. Appellant is proceeding

without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. The clerk’s record does not 

reflect that appellant filed a request for a court reporter’s record. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 34.6 (b). On April 14, 2022, the court reporter provided this court with an 

uncertified copy of a document filed by appellant requesting the portions of the 

record. Also on April 14, 2022, appellant filed an “emergency motion” requesting 

various forms of relief, including that the reporter produce all records from the 

below hearing. That motion is denied. 
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145(i), when a declarant is

proceeding without payment of costs, “the court must designate the portions to be 

transcribed.” Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(i). Accordingly, the trial court is directed to 

conduct a hearing, with 10 days’ notice to the parties and the court reporter, to 

determine what portions of the record are to be transcribed by the court reporter. 

The court is directed to reduce its findings to writing and the trial-court clerk 

is directed to prepare, certify, and file a supplemental clerk’s record containing 

those findings filed with the clerk of this court, together with a reporter’s record 

from the hearing, within 30 days of the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 

34.6(e)(3).

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the 

trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will 

also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or 

the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any 

party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to 

schedule a hearing in compliance with this court’s order. If the parties do not 

request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date 

and notify the parties of such date.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Spain.
# C_2008088EN.01000801.xml

| 9.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/8

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid for employment

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2008/C 88/06)

| Aid No | XE 14/08 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Hungary |
| Region | — |
| Title of aid scheme | TÁMOP foglalkoztatási támogatás |
| Legal basis | 25/2007. (IX. 12.) MeHVM rendelet a Társadalmi Megújulás Operatív Program előirányzatából nyújtott, az Európai Közösséget létrehozó Szerződés 87. cikkének (1) bekezdése hatálya alá tartozó támogatások felhasználásáról |
| Budget | Annual budget: HUF 14 089,8 million |
| Maximum aid intensity | In conformity with Articles 4(2)-(5), 5 and 6 of the Regulation |
| Date of implementation | 12.9.2007 |
| Duration | 30.6.2008 |
| Objective | Art. 4: Creation of employment; Art. 5: Recruitment of disadvantaged and disabled workers; Art. 6: Employment of disabled workers |
| Economic sectors | All Community sectors (1) eligible for employment aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Nemzeti Fejlesztési Ügynökség Humán Erőforrás Programok Irányító Hatósága |
| Pozsonyi út 56 |
| H-1133 Budapest |

Aid No

XE 14/08

Member State

Hungary

Region

—

Title of aid scheme

TÁMOP foglalkoztatási támogatás

Legal basis

25/2007. (IX. 12.) MeHVM rendelet a Társadalmi Megújulás Operatív Program előirányzatából nyújtott, az Európai Közösséget létrehozó Szerződés 87. cikkének (1) bekezdése hatálya alá tartozó támogatások felhasználásáról

Budget

Annual budget: HUF 14 089,8 million

Maximum aid intensity

In conformity with Articles 4(2)-(5), 5 and 6 of the Regulation

Date of implementation

12.9.2007

Duration

30.6.2008

Objective

Art. 4: Creation of employment; Art. 5: Recruitment of disadvantaged and disabled workers; Art. 6: Employment of disabled workers

Economic sectors

All Community sectors (1) eligible for employment aid

1

Name and address of the granting authority

Nemzeti Fejlesztési Ügynökség Humán Erőforrás Programok Irányító Hatósága

Pozsonyi út 56

H-1133 Budapest

---

(1)  With the exception of the shipbuilding sector and other sectors subject to special rules in regulations and directives governing all State aid within the sector.

1

---
NO T REC OM M EN DE D F OR P UB LIC AT ION File Na me: 09a0746n.06 No. 09-3385 UN ITED STA TES C OU RT OF AP P EA LS F OR THE SI XT H C IR CU IT
VA UG HN M c CL IN E, P laintif f-App ellee,
v. DA VI D R OOSE , Defendan t-Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON AP P EAL FROM THE U NI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT FOR THE N O R T H E R

N D IS T R IC T O F O H IO

BEFORE: MERRITT, GIBBONS, an d McK EAGU E, Circuit Judges
M ERR I TT , C ir c ui tJ udge. T h e p arties in thi s case have w aived or al ar g ument and submitt ed the c ase on the briefs. It is an i n t er l o cutory appea l by

the def endant Roose, a

police office r, who disagree s with the di strict court’s ruling denying his de fense of qualified immunity . The appea l is dism issed for the r eason that this court lacks a ppellate jurisdiction over

the interlocutory appea l under Johnson v. J ones , 51 5 U. S
. 304, 319-20 (1995) , in which the Court held that “a defe ndant, entitled to invoke a qua lified immunit y defe nse, m ay

not appea l a district court’s
summa ry jud g me nt or de r ins of

ar as that ord e r de te rm ine s whe the r o r n ot t he pr e tr ia l r e c or d s e ts f

or th
a ‘g e nu ine ’ i ssu e of

fa c t f or tr ia l.” Th e Court

sta te d th at “an inte rl oc uto ry a pp e a l c on c e rn ingthi s kind of issue in a sense makes unwise use of appellate court’s time, by forc ing them to de cide in the context of a less deve loped re cord, a n issue very

simil ar to one they may

well dec ide any

way later,No. 09-3385

Mc Clin e v . R oo se

-2- on a rec ord that will permit a better decision.” Id. at 317. Her e in a c omprehe nsive, well-r easone d opinion, J udg e Wells in section I I IB r ecites the disputed fac ts conce rningthe al l ege d use of excessive forc e. 2009 WL585844 (Mar ch 3, 2009). Those same disputed fac ts remain disputed on appea l. The def

endant Roose doe s not ag ree that the fa ctual alleg ations of the plaintiff r eg ardingthe use of e x cessive f

orce should gove rn t he question of qualified immuni ty on appea l or the question of whether his c onduct violates clea rly established constitutional rights. He c ontinues to insis t on the fa cts that the District Court conc luded wer e in dispute. Thus, Roose’s ca se does not fa ll within t he ca t eg ory of ca ses open to interloc utory appea l based on qua lified immunit y . Ac c or din g ly , th e a

pp e a l is dis mis se d for la c k of ap pe llate jur isd ic tio n, wh ic h r e tur ns the c a se to t he Di str ic t Co ur

t f or fu rt he r p ro c e e din g s.
Exhibit 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-18265 of Biofield Corp. on Form S-8 of our report dated March 28, 2003
(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory
paragraph relating to Biofield Corp.'s ability to continue as a going concern
and includes an emphasis of matter paragraph concerning Biofield Corp.'s status
as a Development Stage Enterprise) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
of Biofield Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2002 and to the reference to
us under the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus, which is part of such
Registration Statement.



/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE

Atlanta, Georgia
April 14, 2003

                                       55
§ 15.605 Credentialed operators for uninspected passenger vessels. Each uninspected passenger vessel (UPV) must be under the direction and control of an individual credentialed by the Coast Guard, as follows: ( a ) Every UPV of 100 GRT or more, as defined by 46 U.S.C. 2101(53)(A), must be under the command of an individual holding a license or MMC endorsed as master. When navigated, it must be under the direction and control of a credentialed master, pilot, or mate.
( b ) Every self-propelled UPV as defined by 46 U.S.C. 2101(53)(B) must be under the direction and control of an individual holding a license or MMC endorsed as or equivalent to an operator of an uninspected passenger vessel (OUPV).
( c ) Personnel serving on UPVs engaged on international voyages must meet the requirements of subpart K of this part.
[USCG-2004-17914, 78 FR 78004, Dec. 24, 2013, as amended by USCG-2023-0759, 89 FR 22948, Apr. 3, 2024]
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.1814 Cargo information cards. ( a ) No person may operate a vessel unless a cargo information card for each cargo being transported is carried either in the wheelhouse, in the ship's office, or in another location easily accessible to the person in charge of the watch.
( b ) When a vessel is moored at a terminal, the master shall ensure that a set of information cards is in the possession of the terminal's person in charge of cargo transfer operations.
( c ) Each card must be at least 17 cm × 24 cm (63 ⁄ 4 in. × 91 ⁄ 2 in.), have printing on one side only, and must contain the following information about the cargo: ( 1 ) Name as listed in Table 4.
( 2 ) Appearance.
( 3 ) Odor.
( 4 ) Safe handling procedures, including special handling instructions, and handling hazards.
( 5 ) Procedures to follow in the event of spills, leaks, or uncontrolled cargo release.
( 6 ) Procedures to be followed if a person is exposed to the cargo.
( 7 ) Firefighting procedures and materials.
#### § 170.085 Information required before a stability test.

If a stability test is to be performed, a stability test procedure that contains the information prescribed in § 170.185(g) must be submitted to the Coast Guard Marine Safety Center at least two weeks before the test.

[CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51217, Sept. 30, 1997, as amended by USCG-2007-0030, 75 FR 78083, Dec. 14, 2010]
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.534 Cargo pumps and cargo compressors.

Cargo pumps and cargo compressors must shut-down automatically when the quick-closing shut-off valves under §§ 154.530 and 154.532 are closed by the emergency shut-down system required under § 154.540.
Exhibit 32.1

Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George G. Andrews, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ George G. AndrewsGeorge G. Andrews, Chief Executive Officerand Director


May 16, 2011
# C_2008178EN.01002901.xml

| 15.7.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/29

---

Notice concerning a request in accordance with Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council

Request made by a Member State

(2008/C 178/25)

On 3 July 2008, the Commission received a request in accordance with Article 30(4) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (1). The first working day following receipt of the request is 4 July 2008.

1

This request, made by the Czech Republic, concerns electricity production in that country. Article 30 provides that Directive 2004/17/EC is not applicable when the relevant activity is directly exposed to competition in markets to which access is not restricted. These conditions are evaluated solely for the purposes of Directive 2004/17/EC and are without prejudice to the application of competition rules.

The Commission is allowed a period of three months to take a decision on this request, commencing on the working day referred to above. The period therefore expires on 4 October 2008.

The provisions of the third subparagraph of the abovementioned paragraph 4 are not applicable. Consequently, the period allowed to the Commission may be extended by three months. Any such extension must be published.

---

(1)  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 161

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 161 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49238, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59787, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 161.002-9 Fire detection system, power supply.

The power supply for a fire detection system must meet the requirements of § 113.10-9 of this chapter.

[USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48276, July 22, 2016]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Achillion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael D. Kishbauch, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: August 3, 2009 |  | /s Michael D. Kishbauch              
|                      |  | Michael D. Kishbauch                 
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.