alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case Number: 14-cr-20629 

 v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

 Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris 

JAMES NATHANIEL NORMAN, 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING 

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA 

AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT 

On January 8, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris conducted a plea 

hearing pursuant to Defendant’s consent. The Magistrate Judge issued her report on that same 

day, recommending that this Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty. 

Although the Magistrate Judge’s report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may 

object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, 

neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the 

Magistrate Judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and 

recommendation waives any further right to appeal. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation 

(ECF No. 15) is ADOPTED. 

 

1:14-cr-20629-TLL-PTM Doc # 18 Filed 02/12/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 85
 It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s plea of guilty is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 

Plea Agreement (ECF No. 13) is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT. 

Dated: February 12, 2015 s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on February 12, 2015. 

 s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

 TRACY A. JACOBS 

1:14-cr-20629-TLL-PTM Doc # 18 Filed 02/12/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 86
§ 141.330 Skiffs as survival craft. A skiff may be substituted for all or part of the approved survival craft for towing vessels that do not operate more than 3 miles from shore. A skiff used as a survival craft does not require Coast Guard approval but must: ( a ) Be capable of being launched within 5 minutes under all circumstances;
( b ) Be of suitable size for all persons on board the towing vessel;
( c ) Not exceed the loading specified on the capacity plate required by 33 CFR 183.23;
( d ) Not contain modifications affecting the buoyancy or structure of the skiff;
( e ) Be of suitable design for the vessel's intended service; and
( f ) Be marked in accordance with §§ 199.176 and 199.178 of this chapter.
## In the Court of A ppeals Second Appellate Distr ict of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 21

- 00166

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 362nd District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 19

- 9876

- 362

Before Kerr , Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ. Memorandu m Opinion by Justice Ke rr 

### D IANE 

### B OZANICH 

### R ATLEY 

### , Appellant

V


### . W ILLIAM 

### D AVID 

### R ATLEY 

### , Appe llee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION
In this di vorce case, Dian e Bozanich Ratley attempts to appeal from the trial

court ’ s “ Order on M o tion for J udgment Nunc Pro Tunc ” correcting the trial court ’ s

“ Order for Ap pointment of Re altor , ” which appointe d a realtor to list and sell the Ratleys ’ ma rital reside n ce. Because neither order appeared to be a final judgment or a n
appe alable interlocutory order, w e notified appellant of our co ncern that we lack jurisdicti on over this appeal

. We inf ormed her that u nless she or a ny party desiring to

con tinue the appeal filed a response within ten days showing grounds for continuing the appeal, we wo uld dismiss i t for want of juris diction

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a ), 44.3. Ten days have passed , and we have received n o response. We have jurisdiction to consider ap peals only from final judgments and from
certain interlocutory orders ma de immediately appealable by stat ute. See Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp

. , 39 S.W.3d 191 , 1 95 (Tex. 2001 ) ; see also Tex. Civ. Pr ac. & Rem

. Code
A n n. § 51.014( a)

. Unless a statutory exc eption app lies, a n order that does not dispose
of all p ending parties and claims remains inter locutory and unappealable until a final judgment is si gned. See Lehma nn , 39 S.W.3d at 1 95 ; In re Roxsane R

. , 249 S.W.3d 76 4 , 77 4

– 7 5 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 2008, orig. proceeding )

. Here, neither order is a final judgment or an appeala ble inte rloc utory order, and

we thus dismiss th is appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex

. R. App. P . 42.3(a) , 43.2(f)

.3 /s/ Elizabeth Kerr Elizabe th Kerr Justice
Delivered: September 23, 20 21
§ 75.207 Specific award conditions. ( a ) The HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional specific award conditions as needed in accordance with paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, under the following circumstances: ( 1 ) Based on the criteria set forth in § 75.205;
( 2 ) When an applicant or recipient has a history of failure to comply with the general or specific terms and conditions of a Federal award;
( 3 ) When an applicant or recipient fails to meet expected performance goals as described in § 75.210, or;
( 4 ) When an applicant or recipient is not otherwise responsible.
( b ) These additional Federal award conditions may include items such as the following: ( 1 ) Requiring payments as reimbursements rather than advance payments;
( 2 ) Withholding authority to proceed to the next phase until receipt of evidence of acceptable performance within a given period of performance;
( 3 ) Requiring additional, more detailed financial reports;
( 4 ) Requiring additional project monitoring;
( 5 ) Requiring the non-Federal entity to obtain technical or management assistance; or
( 6 ) Establishing additional prior approvals.
( c ) The HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity must notify the applicant or non-Federal entity as to: ( 1 ) The nature of the additional requirements;
( 2 ) The reason why the additional requirements are being imposed;
( 3 ) The nature of the action needed to remove the additional requirement, if applicable;
( 4 ) The time allowed for completing the actions if applicable, and
( 5 ) The method for requesting reconsideration of the additional requirements imposed.
( d ) Any specific conditions must be promptly removed once the conditions that prompted them have been corrected.
[79 FR 75889, Dec. 19, 2014, as amended at 81 FR 3015, Jan. 20, 2016]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Form
10-QSB") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").

         I, Tracey A. Welsh, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Issuer, certify that:

         (i)      the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii)     the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Issuer.

Dated: August 14, 2002


                                             /s/ Tracey A. Welsh
                                             ------------------------------
                                             Tracey A. Welsh
                                             Vice President and
                                             Chief Financial Officer
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 1 4

- 00 420

- CR
MICHAEL RASHAD CRAIG , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Appeal from the 337 th District Court of Harris County (Tr. Ct. No. 1333045 )

. The cause heard today by the Court is an appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on May 14, 2014 . After inspecting the record of the court below, it is the opinion of this Court that th ere is no reversible error in the judgment. It is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED, and ORDERED that the judgment of the court below be affirmed

. The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.
Judgment rendered January 13, 2015

. Per curiam opinion delivered by panel consisting of Justice s Keyes, Higley, and Brown

.
§ 11.553 Chief engineer (OSV). ( a ) The minimum service required to qualify an applicant for an endorsement as chief engineer (OSV) is 4 years of total service in the engineroom of vessels. One year of this service must have been as an engineer officer while holding an engineer officer endorsement. Two years of the service must have been as a qualified member of the engine department or equivalent position.
( b ) If an applicant has not obtained at least 50 percent of the required experience on vessels of 4,000 HP/3,000 kW or more, a propulsion power limitation is placed on the MMC based on the applicant's qualifying experience. The endorsement is limited to the maximum propulsion power on which at least 25 percent of the required experience was obtained, or 150 percent of the maximum propulsion power on which at least 50 percent of the service was obtained, whichever is higher. Limitations are in multiples of 1,000 HP/750 kW, using the next higher figure when an intermediate propulsion power is calculated. When the limitation as calculated equals or exceeds 10,000 HP/7,500 kW, an unlimited propulsion power endorsement is issued.
( c ) A person holding an endorsement as chief engineer (OSV) may qualify for an STCW endorsement, according to §§ 11.325, 11.327, and 11.331 of this part.
( d ) The Coast Guard may exempt an applicant from meeting any requirement under STCW Regulation III/2 (incorporated by reference, see § 11.102 of this part) that the Coast Guard determines to be inappropriate or unnecessary for service on an OSV, or that the applicant meets under the equivalency provisions of Article IX of STCW.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
 HOMELAND SECURITY CAPITAL CORPORATIONMarch 31, 2011
    By:
    /s/ C. Thomas McMillenName:
    C. Thomas McMillenTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
Principal Executive Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 151.40-2 Materials.

Materials used in the construction of temperature or pressure control systems shall be suitable for the intended application and meet the requirements of Subchapter F and the Special Requirements section of this subchapter.
~ Fly a 4 point square box clockwise and rotate the 

phantom in the direction of travel. 

----- ~r-----~ 

. ~ 

. ~ 

. ~ 

. ~ , • . ~ . 

+~--------~--------- i ` ,,,, ` • ,,,,,• ~ 

© Fly a circle counter-clockwise and keep the aircraft 

nose pointed in the direction of travel. Be sure to keep 

the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible. 

„ _-----~---__ _ 

. , 

~ 

, 

. - 

--- ►-------- -" ® 

~ Fly a circle counter-clockwise with the aircraft nose 

• pointed at the center of the circle. Be sure to keep 

the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as 

possible. 

• ~ 

-L ~=~_~~~~-- ----I--- -_ 

.odt ~ • ~ 

, - 

, ~ 

, ' =- -jl 

~ 

, 

. ,,a- ~ 

- 

, FU O 

~ 

- — — — — — • 

-- —® 
~ Fly a figure 8 without rotating the Phantom. Be sure to keep 

the altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible. 

• ` , ; -------,__ ~' ® $ 

~ 

• 

` -'- ~

------- 

~ 

Fly a Figure 8 with the aircraft nose of the Phantom 

pointed in the direction of travel. Be sure to keep the 

altitude the same and the circle as uniform as possible. 

r~. 

~~ 

hr~'—' Affi 

. ~ 

7FT,® $ 

.. 

~ 

--

~

------- 

~

Fly Figure 8 patterns while experimenting with different orientations. 

For example, aircraft nose always pointed in a given direction or 

opposite/left/right the direction of travel. etc. Be sure to keep the 

altitude thesame and the circle as uniform as possible. 

'-~-'•,-~y;'~~ --~ ------_ ~ ` _ - - 

- ® $ 

'I----- ~

-- ----------~, 

•~ _ ` ~ 

•~ ~ . - ~' ~ I■1 ' ---~

-------- 

r i ~o~ ► 

~~ I I 
~

Return Home & Land Mode 

Be sure you are in a large open area. Before you take off, 

make sure you have a good GPS lock by ensuring your LED 

indicators are flashing Green. Fly the Phantom at least 50ft 

away from your take off point. Turn off the Remote Controller. 

The Phantom will enter it 's failsafe Return-To-Home Mode. 

Let the Phantom finisf, it "s routine and land itself within 2 rneters 

of the take off point. 

= 

uar 

 ----- ►- - - - - - - - - 

~ T o >< cQgo 

, 

~ 

. ® ° . 

~ 15 meters ~ ® 

~ ~ ® 

©

Intercepting Return Home & Land Mode 

Be sure you are in a large open area. Before you take off, make 

sure you have a good GPS lock by ensuring your LED indicators 

are flashing Green. Fly the Phantom 50ft away from your take 

off point. Turn off the Remote Controller. The Phantom will 

enter it "s failsafe Return-To-Home Mode. When the Phantom 

is returning home, you can intercept RTH Mode by switching 

the Sl Switch from the top position to the middle or lower 

position, then continue flying the Phantom. 

i nrrr 

- - - -► - - - - - 0 

• ® ~~. ~ 

~ 15 meters ~ ~ • 

go 

,~ . ~ o. ~ 
,.. 

Copyright:2014 DJl.lnnovations. AII Rights Reserved. ~ 

. ~
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b)
AND 15d-14(b)


(Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Intergrated Energy, Inc. on Form
10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned
does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her
knowledge and belief:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of the operation of the
Company.





Dated:
      June
      3, 2010By:
              /s/
      Gao XinchengGao
      XinchengChief
      Executive Officer and
President





Dated:
      June
      3, 2010By:
              /s/
      Albert C. PuAlbert
      C. PuChief
      Financial Officer
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

RYAN DUNCAN, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cv-14001 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

REPWEST INSURANCE 

COMPANY, et al., 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL 

DISCOVERY RESPONSES (ECF #42)

On September 10, 2014, Plaintiff Ryan Duncan (“Plaintiff”) filed an action 

in the Wayne County Circuit Court against Defendants Geico Insurance Company 

(“Geico”), Repwest Insurance Company (“Repwest”), and U-Haul Company of 

Arizona (“U-Haul”) (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging that he was wrongfully 

denied insurance policy benefits owed to him. (See Compl. at ¶ 15, ECF #1-2 at 6-

7, Pg. ID 13.) Defendants removed the action to this Court on October 16, 2014 

(see ECF #1), and Defendants Repwest and U-Haul were dismissed from this 

action on December 2, 2014 and February 23, 2015, respectively (see ECF ## 19, 

26). Geico is the only remaining defendant in this action. Currently, Plaintiff and 

Geico are in the process of fact discovery. (See Scheduling Order, ECF #28 at 1, 

Pg. ID 194.) 

2:14-cv-14001-MFL-RSW Doc # 43 Filed 05/26/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 352
2 

On March 25, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel discovery responses 

from Geico (the “Motion”). (See ECF #42.) In the Motion, Plaintiff requested that 

the Court order Geico to produce certain identified discovery requests. (See 

generally id.) Geico’s response to the Motion was due on April 11, 2016. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(b)(2)(A). To date, however, Geico has not filed a response to 

the Motion. Because the Motion is unopposed and because Plaintiff’s requests are 

not clearly improper, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion (ECF #42) is 

GRANTED, and Geico shall produce the requested discovery no later than June 

15, 2016. 

s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: May 26, 2016 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on May 26, 2016, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113 

2:14-cv-14001-MFL-RSW Doc # 43 Filed 05/26/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 353
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.049-2 Types and sizes. ( a ) *Type.* Buoyant cushions shall be of the box type, i.e., have top, bottom, and gusset. Pillow type cushions without a gusset are not acceptable.
( b ) *Sizes.* Buoyant cushions shall have not less than 225 square inches of top surface area, shall contain not less than 630 cubic inches of buoyant material, shall not be less than 2 inches thick, and shall have width no less than 12 inches and length no less than 15 inches, respectively.
[CGFR 65-37, 30 FR 11586, Sept. 10, 1965, as amended by USCG-1998-4442, 63 FR 52191, Sept. 30, 1998]
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.463 Vent system discharges. The discharge of a venting system must be at least 10 m (approx. 32.8 ft) from an ignition source if: ( a ) The cargo tank is endorsed to carry a flammable or combustible cargo; and
( b ) Table 1 requires the cargo to have a PV venting system.
-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

_______________________________ 

 

 

PATRICIA BOUCHER, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

DYNIA & ASSOCIATES, LLC, an 

Illinois Limited Liability Company; et 

al., 

Defendants. 

/

Case No.: 2:14-cv-13611-GER-MKM

Judge: Hon. Gerald E. Rosen 

Magistrate: Hon. Mona K. Majzoub 

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO PLAINTIFF AND 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO THE PUTATIVE CLASS 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), 

Michelle Stevens, Plaintiff, hereby gives notice of dismissal of this action, with 

prejudice as to herself and without prejudice as to the rights of the unnamed putative 

class members. The Court shall maintain jurisdiction over the above-entitled matter 

to enforce the terms of the Parties’ agreement dated January 26, 2015, and the related 

Settlement Documentation defined therein. 

Case 2:14-cv-13611-GER-MKM ECF No. 5 filed 02/13/15 PageID.51 Page 1 of 2
-2-

Respectfully submitted this 2nd Day of February 2015. 

 

s/ Andrew T. Thomasson 

Andrew T. Thomasson, Esq. 

NJ Bar No. 048362011 

THOMASSON LAW, LLC 

101 Hudson Street, 21st Floor 

Jersey City, NJ 07302 

Telephone: (201) 479-9969 

Facsimile: (855) 479-9969 

E-Mail: andrew@thomassonllc.com 

One of the Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

Patricia Boucher

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Andrew T. Thomasson, hereby affirm under the penalties of perjury that on 

February 12, 2015, I served the within documents and all supporting papers on the 

Clerk of this Court using this Court’s CM/ECF system. I also certify that the 

foregoing documents are being served this day on all counsel of record and Parties 

to this action in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notice of Electronic 

Filing generated by CM/EFC or in some other authorized manner for those counsel 

or parties who have not yet appeared or are otherwise not authorized to receive 

electronic Notices of Electronic Filing. 

 s/ Andrew T. Thomasson 

Andrew T. Thomasson, Esq. 

Case 2:14-cv-13611-GER-MKM ECF No. 5 filed 02/13/15 PageID.52 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.284 Characteristics of required quick closing valves. A remotely actuated quick closing shutoff valve required by § 153.530(n) must: ( a ) Be a positive shutoff valve;
( b ) Be of the fail-closed type that closes on loss of power;
( c ) Be capable of local manual closing;
( d ) Close from the time of actuation in 30 seconds or less; and
( e ) Be equipped with a fusible element that melts at less than 104 °C (approx. 220 °F) and closes the valve.
[CGD 78-128, 47 FR 21208, May 17, 1982; 47 FR 27293, June 24, 1982]
§ 108.197 Construction of accommodation spaces. ( a ) Each sleeping, mess, recreational, or hospital space that is adjacent to or immediately above a stowage or machinery space, paint locker, drying room, washroom, toilet space, or other odor source must be made odorproof.
( b ) Each accommodation space that is adjacent to or immediately above a galley, machinery space, machinery casing, boiler room, or other noise or heat source, must be protected from the heat and noise.
( c ) Where the shell or an unsheathed weather deck forms a boundary of an accommodation space, the shell of deck must have a covering that prevents the formation of moisture.
( d ) The deckheads of each accommodation space must be a light color.
( e ) Each accommodation space in which water may accumulate must have a drain scupper located in the lowest part of the space, considering the average trim of the unit.
( f ) Each public toilet space must be constructed and located so that its odors do not readily enter any sleeping, mess, recreational, or hospital space.
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      The undersigned, Sterling H. McDonald, Chief Financial Officer of Natural
Gas Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), certifies in connection with the filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report")") pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of
2002, to his knowledge, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of
the 27th day of September, 2005.


/s/   STERLING H. MCDONALD
-----------------------------
      Sterling H. McDonald
      Chief Financial Officer