alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.934 Entry into spaces containing cargo vapor. ( a ) No person may enter a cargo tank, cargo handling space, pumproom or enclosed space in the cargo area without the permission of the master.
( b ) Before permitting anyone to enter a cargo tank, cargo handling space, pumproom or other enclosed space in the cargo area, the master shall make sure that: ( 1 ) The space is free of toxic vapors and has sufficient oxygen to support life; or
( 2 ) Those entering the space wear protective equipment with self-contained breathing apparatus as described in § 153.214(b) and an officer closely supervises the entire operation.
[CGD 73-96, 42 FR 49027, Sept. 26, 1977, as amended by CGD 78-128, 47 FR 21210, May 17, 1982]
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6505** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. WILLIAM TIMOTHY KEMPH , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Arenda L. Wright Allen , District Judge. ( 2:06

- cr - 00159

- AWA

- JEB

- 1 )

Submitted : July 28, 2016 Decided: August 2, 2016

Before MOTZ and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. William Timothy Kemph, Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Willia m Timothy Kemph appeals the district court ’ s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the di strict court. United States v. Kemph , No. 2:06

- cr - 00159

- AWA

- JEB

- 1 (E.D. Va. f iled Mar. 21, 2016 & entered Mar. 22, 2016) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court a nd argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

SINGH HOUSING & INVESTMENT, LLC et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 14-14021

CITY OF INKSTER, 

Defendant.

/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On November 25, 2014, the court conducted a telephone conference in the

above-captioned matter. During the conference, counsel for both parties anticipated

that a case pending before the Michigan Court of Appeals, Trahey v. City of Inkster, No.

320161 (Mich. Ct. App. filed Feb. 3, 2014), might have a significant impact on the

instant suit. The parties agreed to dismiss this matter with the possibility of reopening

this matter based on the outcome of Trahey. It thus appears that further court

involvement is, at this point, unnecessary. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

Nothing in this order shall be deemed to adversely affect or in any way impact the

parties’ rights. Any party may reopen this case within thirty days of the issuance of a

final decision in Trahey, by filing a “Notice of Reopening.” If such a notice is filed, the

case will immediately be placed back on the court’s active docket, with no further costs

or fees to either party and the litigation will proceed as if the case had not been

dismissed. 

2:14-cv-14021-RHC-PJK Doc # 11 Filed 12/05/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 30
After thirty days following the issuance of a final decision in Trahey, in the

absence of any further order of the court or filing by the parties, this dismissal will be

with prejudice.

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: December 5, 2014

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, December 5, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C1 ORDERS\14-14021.SINGH.Dismissal.DMI.wpd

2

2:14-cv-14021-RHC-PJK Doc # 11 Filed 12/05/14 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 31
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Belcrest Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                            
|   



|Date: November 7, 2008
|----------------------



| | /s/ Andrew C. FrenetteAndrew C. FrenetteChief Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 2:14-cv-13362-SFC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 08/29/14 PageID.1 Page 1 of 16
Case 2:14-cv-13362-SFC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 08/29/14 PageID.2 Page 2 of 16
Case 2:14-cv-13362-SFC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 08/29/14 PageID.3 Page 3 of 16
Case 2:14-cv-13362-SFC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 08/29/14 PageID.4 Page 4 of 16
Case 2:14-cv-13362-SFC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 08/29/14 PageID.5 Page 5 of 16
Case 2:14-cv-13362-SFC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 08/29/14 PageID.6 Page 6 of 16
Case 2:14-cv-13362-SFC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 08/29/14 PageID.7 Page 7 of 16
Case 2:14-cv-13362-SFC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 08/29/14 PageID.8 Page 8 of 16
Case 2:14-cv-13362-SFC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 08/29/14 PageID.9 Page 9 of 16
Case 2:14-cv-13362-SFC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 08/29/14 PageID.10 Page 10 of 16
Case 2:14-cv-13362-SFC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 08/29/14 PageID.11 Page 11 of 16
Case 2:14-cv-13362-SFC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 08/29/14 PageID.12 Page 12 of 16
Case 2:14-cv-13362-SFC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 08/29/14 PageID.13 Page 13 of 16
Case 2:14-cv-13362-SFC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 08/29/14 PageID.14 Page 14 of 16
Case 2:14-cv-13362-SFC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 08/29/14 PageID.15 Page 15 of 16
Case 2:14-cv-13362-SFC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 08/29/14 PageID.16 Page 16 of 16
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 203 (Thursday, October 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65190-65191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-27156]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Oak Ridge 
Reservation

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Oak Ridge 
Reservation. The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 
Stat. 770) requires that public notice of this meeting be announced in 
the Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, November 9, 2011, 6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: DOE Information Center, 475 Oak Ridge Turnpike, Oak Ridge, 
Tennessee 37830.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melyssa P. Noe, Federal Coordinator, 
Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box 2001, EM-90, 
Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Phone (865) 241-3315; Fax (865) 576-0956 or e-
mail: noemp@oro.doe.gov or check the Web site at http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the areas of 
environmental restoration, waste management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda: The main meeting presentation will be on the Oak 
Ridge National Laboratory Hot Cell Cleanup.
    Public Participation: The EM SSAB, Oak Ridge, welcomes the 
attendance of the public at its advisory committee meetings and will 
make every effort to accommodate persons with physical

[[Page 65191]]

disabilities or special needs. If you require special accommodations 
due to a disability, please contact Melyssa P. Noe at least seven days 
in advance of the meeting at the phone number listed above. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to the 
agenda item should contact Melyssa P. Noe at the address or telephone 
number listed above. Requests must be received five days prior to the 
meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include the 
presentation in the agenda. The Deputy Designated Federal Officer is 
empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the 
orderly conduct of business. Individuals wishing to make public 
comments will be provided a maximum of five minutes to present their 
comments.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing or calling Melyssa P. 
Noe at the address and phone number listed above. Minutes will also be 
available at the following Web site: http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab/minutes.htm.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on October 14, 2011.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-27156 Filed 10-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
Nos. 6197 and 6198.

#### Adam Armstrong *v.*The State.

Fraudulent Disposition of Mortgaged Property—Indictment, to be sufficient to charge the offense of fraudulently disposing of mortgaged property, with intent to defraud, etc., must allege the name of the person to whom the mortgaged property was disposed or sold, or that the name of such person was to the grand jury unknown.

*463Opinion delivered April 10, 1889.

Appeals from the District court of Dallas. Tried below before the Hon. G. H. Aldredge.

These were convictions for fraudulently disposing of mortgaged property, the penalties assessed being a term of two years in the first and of three years in the penitentiary in the second case.

Ho brief in either case for the appellant.

*W. L.*Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

White, Presiding Judge.

Appellant in each of the above cases has been convicted of a fraudulent disposition of mortgaged property. An indictment, to be sufficient to charge the offense of selling or disposing of mortgaged property with intent to defraud, must allege the name of the person to whom the mortgaged property was disposed or sold, or that the name of such person was unknown to the grand jury. (Smith v. The State, 26 Texas Ct. App., 577; Presley v. The State, 24 Texas Ct. App., 494; Alexander v. The State, ante. 94.)

Because the indictments in. these cases are fatally defective in this regard, the judgments are reversed and the prosecutions dismissed.

*Reversed and*dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1517]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; 
Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Advisory Council for Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Advisory Council for Biomedical 
Imaging and Bioengineering, May Council.
    Date: May 16, 2007.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 1:15 p.m.
    Agenda: Report from the Institute Director, other Institute 
Staff and presentations of working group reports.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20817.
    Closed: 1:15 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Anthony Demsey, PhD, Director, Office of 
Extramural Policy, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Room 241, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www.nibib1.nih.gov/about/NACBIB/NACBIB.htm, where an 
agency and any additional information for the meeting will be posted 
when applicable.

    Dated: March 21, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1517 Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
BILLING CODE: 6715-01-M
 

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Notice 

AGENCY: FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 

DATE & TIME: THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 1,2011 AT 10:00 A.M. 

PLACE: 999 E STREET, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. (NINTH FLOOR) 

STATUS: THIS MEETING WILL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. 

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 

Correction and Approval of the Minutes for the Meeting of August 4, 2011 

Draft Advisory Opinion 2011-15: Abdul Karim Hassan, Esq. 

Draft Advisory Opinion 2011-17: Giffords for Congress 

Interpretive Rule on When Certain Independent Expenditures are "Publicly 

Disseminated" for Reporting Purposes 

Proposed Final Audit Report on the United Association Political Education 

Committee (A09-27) 

Management and Administrative Matters 

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language 

interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Shawn Woodhead 

Werth, Commission Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to 

the hearing date. 

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:	 Judith Ingram, Press Officer 

Telephone: (202) 694-1220 

Signed: 

Shawn Woodhead Werth 

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission 

Submitted: August 25,2011
§ 15.102 Paperwork approval. ( a ) This section lists the control numbers assigned by the Office of Management and Budget under the Paper Reduction Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-511) for the reporting and recordkeeping requirements in this part.
( b ) The following control numbers have been assigned to the sections indicated: ( 1 ) OMB 1625-0079—46 CFR 15.1107.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[CGD 95-62, 62 FR 34538, June 26, 1997, as amended by USCG-2004-18884, 69 FR 58343, Sept. 30, 2004]
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00008-CV

In the Interest of P.S., a Child §

§

§

§

From the 97th District Court

of Archer County (2015-0007A-CV)

October 27, 2016

Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant (Mother) shall pay all of the costs of this 

proceeding, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Sue Walker____________________

 Justice Sue Walker
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2166 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2166

 To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to provide universal service 
        support to head start programs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 29, 2009

 Mr. Cuellar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to provide universal service 
        support to head start programs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UNIVERSAL SERVICE SUPPORT FOR HEAD START PROGRAMS.

    Section 254(h)(7)(A) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 
254(h)(7)(A)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``schools.--The term'' and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``Schools.--
                            ``(i) In general.--The term''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(ii) Head starts included.--The terms 
                        `elementary and secondary schools', `elementary 
                        or secondary school', `elementary schools', and 
                        `school' shall include any local public or 
                        private nonprofit agency that is designated by 
                        the Secretary of Health and Human Services as a 
                        Head Start agency under section 641 of the Head 
                        Start Act (42 U.S.C. 9836).''.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.231 Type II system. A type II containment system must meet the following requirements: ( a ) The vessel must meet the requirements in subpart F of part 172 of this chapter for a type I or II hull.
( b ) Except as allowed in §§ 153.7 and 153.235— ( 1 ) It may be no closer to the tankship's shell than 76 cm (approx. 29.9 in.); and
( 2 ) It may not be located in any part of the tankship subject to the damage described in Table 172.135 of this chapter for Grounding Penetration, Vertical extent from the baseline upward.
[CGD 73-96, 42 FR 49027, Sept. 26, 1977, as amended by CGD 79-023, 48 FR 51009, Nov. 4, 1983; CGD 81-101, 52 FR 7781, Mar. 12, 1987]
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL

FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

______________________________

BAP No. MB 98-096

______________________________

IN RE: SANDI BONFIGLIO,

Debtor.

______________________________

HAROLD B. MURPHY, TRUSTEE,

Appellant,

v.

SANDI BONFIGLIO,

Appellee.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court

for the District of Massachusetts 

(Hon. William C. Hillman, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge)

______________________________

Before

Goodman, Haines and Carlo, U.S. Bankruptcy Judges

______________________________

Andrew G. Lizotte, Esq. and Hanify & King, P.C., on brief for the Appellant.

Mark H. Vanger, Esq., on brief for the Appellee.

______________________________

January 29, 1999

______________________________
2

Per Curiam

Chapter 7 trustee, Harold B. Murphy, appeals the bankruptcy

court's order overruling his objection to the debtor's homestead

exemption claim. We affirm the lower court's ruling on the

authority of the First Circuit's decision in Patriot Portfolio,

LLC, v. Weinstein, __ F.3d __ (1st Cir. 1999).

In re Weinstein held that the Massachusetts homestead

exemption's exception for contract debts incurred before the

filing of a homestead declaration does not operate in bankruptcy.

That case addresses and resolves (against appellant) all issues

critical to the appeal. 

Further explication is unnecessary.

The order of the bankruptcy court overruling appellant's

objection to the debtor's homestead exemption is AFFIRMED.
§ 400.209 Claims involving family units which include refugees who have been in the United States more than 36 months. Federal funding is not available for State expenditures for cash and medical assistance and child welfare services (except services for unaccompanied minors) provided to any refugee within a family unit who has been in the United States ( a ) More than 36 months if the family unit is eligible for TANF, SSI, Medicaid, GA, or child welfare services (except services for unaccompanied minors), or
( b ) More than a period of time to be determined by the Director in accordance with § 400.211 if the family unit is eligible for RCA or RMA. A State agency must exclude expenditures made on behalf of such refugees from its claim.
[51 FR 3916, Jan. 30, 1986, as amended at 53 FR 32225, Aug. 24, 1988; 57 FR 1115, Jan. 10, 1992; 58 FR 46090, Sept. 1, 1993; 58 FR 64507, Dec. 8, 1993; 65 FR 15450, Mar. 22, 2000]
# C_2008138EN.01000901.xml

| 5.6.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/9

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its 412th meeting on 10 July 2006 concerning a draft decision relating to Case COMP/C-3/37.792 — Microsoft

(2008/C 138/06)

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission in considering that the definitive amount of the periodic penalty payment should be fixed at EUR 1,5 million per day of non-compliance, within the framework of the limit fixed by the Article 24(1) Decision (maximum of EUR 2 million per day), thus making a total of EUR 280,5 million. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission in considering that the definitive amount of the periodic penalty payment should be fixed at EUR 1,5 million per day of non-compliance, within the framework of the limit fixed by the Article 24(1) Decision (maximum of EUR 2 million per day), thus making a total of EUR 280,5 million.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of this opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of this opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
#### Beverly Haight and Susan A. Haight, *Respondents, v.*The Continental Insurance Company of the City of New York, *Appellan*t.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.