alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001006604
<NAME> HOUSECALL MEDICAL RESOURCES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,074,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               35,321,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 6,394,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,144,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            39,594,000
<PP&E>                                      11,770,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,738,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             130,766,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       21,454,000
<BONDS>                                     43,214,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       103,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  66,714,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               130,766,000
<SALES>                                    192,065,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           192,065,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           189,679,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             5,498,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,918,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,811,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,743,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,068,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (902,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,970,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.49)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 17917]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1763]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; Final 
Effect of Designation of a Class of Employees for Addition to the 
Special Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice 
concerning the final effect of the HHS decision to designate a class of 
employees at the Monsanto Chemical Company, Dayton, Ohio, as an 
addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy 
Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On 
February 16, 2007, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384q(b), the 
Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an 
addition to the SEC:

    Atomic Weapons Employer (AWE) employees who were monitored or 
should have been monitored for exposure to ionizing radiation while 
working at Monsanto Chemical Company Units I, III, or IV in Dayton, 
Ohio, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days 
during the period from January 1, 1943, through December 31, 1949, 
or in combination with work days within the parameters established 
for one or more other classes of employees in the Special Exposure 
Cohort.

    This designation became effective on March 18, 2007, as provided 
for under 42 U.S.C. 73841(14)(C). Hence, beginning on March 18, 2007, 
members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this notice, 
became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Elliott, Director, Office of 
Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, 
OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). 
Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c232f2d3f2c2f282f422b233a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6e9e5e7f5e6e5e2e588e1e9f0">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: April 5, 2007.
John Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 07-1763 Filed 4-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

On April 12, 2019, Defendant Gino Littles signed and served a Request for 

Reconsideration/Notice of Appeal of the Court’s March 5, 2019 opinion and order denying his § 

2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. (ECF No. 142.) Littles seeks 

reconsideration of the denial of a certificate of appealability. (Id.) In the alternative, he wants the 

motion to serve as his notice of appeal. (Id.) Given the nature of this simultaneous request, it is 

unclear whether the Court has jurisdiction to consider Littles’ request. See United States v. 

Holloway, 740 F.2d 1373, 1082 (6th Cir. 1984) (“It is well settled that the filing of the notice of 

appeal . . . deprives the district court of jurisdiction to act in matters involving the merits of the 

appeal.”); United States v. Gallion, 534 F. App’x 303, 309 (6th Cir. 2013) (jurisdiction is divested 

with the exception of matters collateral to the main cause of action). Because the motion for 

reconsideration is docketed first, the Court will address it. 

Local Rule 7.1 permits a party to move for “rehearing or reconsideration . . . within 14 days 

after entry of the judgment or order.” E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(h)(1). And the moving party has a twopart burden. First the moving party must “demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 

v. 

 

D-1, GINO LITTLES, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 14-20484 

Honorable Laurie J. Michelson 

Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub 

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION AND/OR 

NOTICE OF APPEAL [142] 
2 

the parties and other persons entitled to be heard on the motion have been misled” and then “show 

that correcting the defect will result in a different disposition of the case.” E.D. Mich. Local Rule 

7.1(h)(3). Little’s motion is untimely and otherwise fails to satisfy this standard. 

Accordingly, Littles’ Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. 

SO ORDERED. 

s/Laurie J. Michelson 

LAURIE J. MICHELSON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Date: April 19, 2019 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record 

and/or pro se parties on this date, April 19, 2019, using the Electronic Court Filing system and/or 

first-class U.S. mail. 

s/William Barkholz 

Case Manager
###### Editorial Note on Part 160

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 160.076-5 Definitions.

As used in this part:

*Commandant* means the Chief of the Lifesaving and Fire Safety Standards Division. Address: Commandant (CG-ENG-4), Attn: Lifesaving and Fire Safety Division, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7509, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20593-7509; telephone 202-372-1392 or fax 202-372-1924.

*Conditional approval* means a PFD approval which has condition(s) with which the user must comply in order for the PFD to be counted toward meeting the carriage requirements for the vessel on which it is being used.

*First quality workmanship* means construction which is free from any defect materially affecting appearance or serviceability.

*Inflation medium* means any solid, liquid, or gas that, when activated, provides inflation for buoyancy.

*Inspector* means a recognized laboratory representative assigned to perform, supervise or oversee the duties described in §§ 160.076-29 and 160.076-31 of this subpart or any Coast Guard representative performing duties related to the approval.

*MOU* means memorandum of understanding which describes the approval functions a recognized independent laboratory performs for the Coast Guard, and the recognized independent laboratory's working arrangements with the Coast Guard.

*Performance type* means the in-water performance classification of the PFD.

*PFD* means personal flotation device as defined in 33 CFR 175.13.

*Plans and specifications* means the drawings, product description, construction specifications, and bill of materials submitted in accordance with § 160.076-13 for approval of a PFD design.

[CGD 94-110, 60 FR 32848, June 23, 1995, as amended by CGD 95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995; CGD 94-110, 61 FR 13945, Mar. 28, 1996; CGD 96-041, 61 FR 50733, Sept. 27, 1996; USCG-2006-25697; 71 FR 55747, Sept. 25, 2006; USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49237, Sept. 25, 2009; USCG-2013-0671, 78 FR 60158, Sept. 30, 2013; USCG-2013-0263, 79 FR 56500, Sept. 22, 2014]
###### Editorial Note on Part 153

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 153.333 Cargo pump discharge pressure gauge.

Each cargo pump within a pump-room must have a discharge pressure gauge outside the pumproom.
<PAGE>
                                EXHIBIT 21

                      SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

          As of December 31, 1998, the Registrant had the following
subsidiaries:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
          SUBSIDIARY                       STATE OF INCORPORATION
          ----------                       ----------------------
<S> <C>                                          <C>
     Valley Ridge Bank                            Michigan

     Valley Ridge Realty, Inc.<F*>                Michigan

     Valley Ridge Financial Services, Inc.<F*>    Michigan

     West Shore Computer Services, Inc.<F**>      Michigan

     Valley Ridge Investments, Inc.<F*>           Michigan

<FN>
<F*> Wholly-owned subsidiaries of Valley Ridge Bank

<F**>Valley Ridge Bank owns a twenty percent (20%) interest in West Shore
     Computer Services, Inc.
</FN>
</TABLE>
G-20 Change-in-Terms Sample

Important Changes to Your Account Terms

The following is a summary of changes that are being made to your account terms. You have the right to opt out of these 

changes. For more detailed information, please refer to the booklet enclosed with this statement. The effective date of 

these changes is 5/10/07. Note: The change to your APR for purchases described below wil not go into effect at this time 

if you are already being charged a higher Penalty APR on purchases. This change will go into effect when the Penalty APR 

no longer applies. 

Revised Terms, as of 5/10/07 

APR for Purchases 16.99% 

Late Payment Fee $32 if your balance is less than or equal to $1,000; 

$39 if your balance is more than $1,000
# C_2012032EN.01002503.xml

| 4.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2011 — Commission v Vicente Carbajosa and Others

(Case T-6/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Staff case - Officials - Recruitment - Notice of competition - Open competition - Non-admission to the written test following the result obtained in the admission tests - Distribution of powers between EPSO and the selection board - Principle of the right to be heard)

2012/C 32/52

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendants: Isabel Vicente Carbajosa (Brussels, Belgium); Niina Lehtinen (Brussels); and Myriam Menchén (Brussels) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, E. Marchal and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 October 2010 in Case F-9/09 Vicente Carbajosa and Others v Commission [2010] ECRSC I-0000, seeking to have that judgment set aside in part.

Vicente Carbajosa and Others

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 October 2010 in Case F-9/09 Vicente Carbajosa and Others v Commission in so far as it annuls the decisions of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) not to admit Ms Isabel Vicente Carbajosa in respect of the competition EPSO/AD/117/08 and Ms Niina Lehtinen and Ms Myriam Menchén in respect of the competition EPSO/AD/116/08 onto the list of candidates invited to submit a full application. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 October 2010 in Case F-9/09 Vicente Carbajosa and Others v Commission in so far as it annuls the decisions of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) not to admit Ms Isabel Vicente Carbajosa in respect of the competition EPSO/AD/117/08 and Ms Niina Lehtinen and Ms Myriam Menchén in respect of the competition EPSO/AD/116/08 onto the list of candidates invited to submit a full application.

| 2. | Annuls the decision of EPSO not to admit Ms Vicente Carbajosa in respect of the competition EPSO/AD/117/08 and Ms Lehtinen and Ms Menchén in respect of the competition EPSO/AD/116/08 onto the list of candidates invited to submit a full application. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls the decision of EPSO not to admit Ms Vicente Carbajosa in respect of the competition EPSO/AD/117/08 and Ms Lehtinen and Ms Menchén in respect of the competition EPSO/AD/116/08 onto the list of candidates invited to submit a full application.

| 3. | Orders Ms Vicente Carbajosa, Ms Lehtinen and Ms Menchén and the European Commission to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Ms Vicente Carbajosa, Ms Lehtinen and Ms Menchén and the European Commission to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 72, 5.3.2011.

1

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.517 Piping: Liquid pressure relief.

The cargo loading and discharge crossover headers, cargo hoses, and cargo loading arms must have means to relieve cargo pressure and to remove liquid cargo.
§ 287.150 Are there data collection requirements for Tribes that operate a NEW Program? ( a ) Yes, the Tribal agency or organization responsible for operation of a NEW Program must collect data and submit reports as specified by the Secretary.
( b ) A NEW Program grantee must establish and maintain efficient and effective record-keeping systems to provide accurate and timely information regarding its service population.
( c ) Required reports will provide Tribes, the Secretary, Congress, and other interested parties with information to assess the success of the NEW Program in meeting its goals. Also, the reports will provide the Secretary with information for monitoring program and financial operations.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 59 (Wednesday, March 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 14599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1520]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclose of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel, Methods of Molecular Profiling of Tissues Using 
MALDI & Generalized Analytical Technique for the Metabolome.
    Date: March 30, 2007.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6101 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Kristen V Huntley, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on 
Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-8401, 301-435-1433, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c0a8b5aeb4aca5b9ab80ada1a9aceeaea9a8eea7afb6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bad2cfd4ced6dfc3d1fad7dbd3d694d4d3d294ddd5cc">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 20, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-1520 Filed 3-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
###### Editorial Note on [Part 154](/current/title-46/part-154?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, [60 FR 50466](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/60-FR-50466), Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, [61 FR 50732](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/61-FR-50732), Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, [74 FR 49235](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/74-FR-49235), Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, [77 FR 59785](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/77-FR-59785), Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.172 Contiguous steel hull structure.

(a) Except as allowed in [paragraphs (b)](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-154.172#p-154.172(b)) and [(c)](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-154.172#p-154.172(c)) of this section, plates, forgings, forged and rolled fittings, and rolled and forged bars and shapes used in the construction of the contiguous steel hull structure must meet the thickness and steel grade in Table 1 for the temperatures under [§§ 154.174(b)](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-154.174#p-154.174(b)) and [154.176(b)](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-154.176#p-154.176(b)).

(b) for a minimum temperature, determined under [§§ 154](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-154),[174(b)](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-174#p-174(b)) and [154.176(b)](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-154.176#p-154.176(b)), below −25 °C (−13 °F), the contiguous steel hull structure must meet [§ 54.25-10](/on/2024-09-23/title-46/section-54.25-10) for that minimum temperature.

(c) If a steel grade that is not listed in Table 1 has the equivalent chemical properties, mechanical properties, and heat treatment of a steel grade that is listed, the steel grade not listed may be specially approved by the Commandant (CG-ENG), for use in the contiguous hull structure.

Table 1—Minimum Temperature, Thickness, and Steel Grades in Contiguous Hull Structures

| Minimum temperature | Steel thickness | Steel1 grade |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 0 °C (32 °F) | All | Standards of the American Bureau of Shipping published in “Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels”, 1981 |
| −10 °C (14 °F) | T≤112.5 mm (1/2 in.) | B |
| | 12.5<t≤25.5 mm (1 in.) | D |
| | >25.5 mm (1 in.) | E |
| −25 °C (−13 °F) | t≤112.5 mm (1/2 in.) | D |
| | >12.5 mm (1/2 in.) | E |
| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 Steel grade of the American Bureau of Shipping published in “Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels”, 1981. | | |

[CGD 74-289, [44 FR 26009](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/44-FR-26009), May 3, 1979, as amended by CGD 82-063b, [48 FR 4782](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/48-FR-4782), Feb. 3, 1983; CGD 77-069, [52 FR 31630](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/52-FR-31630), Aug. 21, 1987]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael C. Frederick, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                                                             
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|DATE: August 13, 2007 |  |  |  | BY: |  | /s/ Michael C. Frederick                                    
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Michael C. Frederick                                        
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 9 / Tuesday, January 16, 2007 / Presidential Documents 1909 

Proclamation 8100 of January 11, 2007 

Religious Freedom Day, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

On Religious Freedom Day, we commemorate the passage of the 1786 Virginia 

Statute for Religious Freedom, authored by Thomas Jefferson, and we celebrate the First Amendment’s protection of religious freedom. 

Across the centuries, people have come to America seeking to worship 

the Almighty freely. Today, our citizens profess many different faiths, and 

we welcome every religion. Yet people in many countries live without 

the freedom to worship as they choose and some face persecution for their 

beliefs. My Administration is working with our friends and allies around 

the globe to advance common values and spread the blessings of liberty 

to every corner of the world. Freedom is a gift from the Almighty, written 

in the heart and soul of every man, woman, and child, and we must 

continue to promote the importance of religious freedom at home and abroad. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim January 16, 2007, as 

Religious Freedom Day. I call on all Americans to reflect on the great 

blessing of religious liberty, endeavor to preserve this freedom for future 

generations, and commemorate this day with appropriate events and activities 

in their schools, places of worship, neighborhoods, and homes. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eleventh day 

of January, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 07–161 

Filed 1–12–07; 11:33 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PRESDOCGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>