alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I,  Michael  Cummings,  CEO  of  the  registrant,  certify  that:

     1.     I  have  reviewed  this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Flexxtech
Corporation;

     2.     Based  on  my  knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue  statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to  make  the  statements  made,  in light of the circumstances under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly  report;

     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information  included  in  this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4.     The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for  the  registrant  and  have:

          a.     designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during  the  period  in  which  this  quarterly  report  is  being  prepared;

          b.     evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's disclosure
controls  and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this  quarterly  report  (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and

          c.     presented   in   this  quarterly  report  any  changes  in  the
registrant's internal controls and  procedures are presented in this report our
conclusions  about  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end  of the period covered by this report and based on such evaluation

     5.     The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I have disclosed,
based  on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee  of  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the
equivalent  functions):

          a.     all  significant  deficiencies  in  the  design or operation of
internal  controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's  auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in  internal  controls;  and

          b.     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the registrant's internal
controls.


Date:  August  18,  2003                    /s/  Michael Cummings
                                           ---------------------
                                           Michael  Cummings
                                           Chief Executive Officer
#### § 163.003-7 Independent laboratory.

The approval and production tests in this subpart must be conducted by or under the supervision of an independent laboratory accepted by the Coast Guard under subpart 159.010 of this chapter.
Exhibit 31.2

                                  Certification


I, Kelly L. Hankinson, Chief Financial Officer of Thinkpath Inc., certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thinkpath Inc.;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
         untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
         necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
         under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
         the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
         information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
         material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
         cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
         this quarterly report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
         establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
         defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
         we have:

                  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
         that material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
         is being prepared;

                  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
         controls and procedures as of a date within 45 days prior to the filing
         date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

                  c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
         the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
         our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
         on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
         audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

                  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
         internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability
         to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

                  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
         management or other employees who have a significant role in the
         registrant's internal controls.


Date: May 20, 2005
                                                /S/ KELLY HANKINSON
                                                --------------------
                                                Kelly L. Hankinson
                                                Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 333-146034 on Forms S-8 of our report dated May 7, 2009 relating to our
audit of the financial statements of Smoky Market Foods, Inc. for the periods
ending December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, which appear in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Smoky Market Foods, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
2008.



/s/ Moore & Associates, Chartered
---------------------------------
   Moore & Associates, Chartered

Las Vegas, Nevada
May 13, 2009
#### § 113.10-1 Approved equipment.

Each alarm annunciator, fire detector, test station, manual station, and vibrating bell must be approved under Subpart 161.002 of this chapter and meet the requirements of this subpart.
§ 116.422 Ceilings, linings, trim, interior finish and decorations. ( a ) Ceilings, linings, and any furring incidental to their installation in control spaces, passageways, stairways, accommodation spaces and service spaces must be of noncombustible material in accordance with § 164.009 in subchapter Q of this chapter, or other standard specified by the Commandant.
( b ) Bulkheads, linings and ceilings may be covered by a combustible interior finish provided that such a finish is: ( 1 ) Approved under § 164.012 in subchapter Q of this chapter, or other standard specified by the Commandant; or
( 2 ) Listed by Underwriters Laboratories, does not exceed 2 millimeters (.075 inches) in thickness, and has a flame spread rating of not more than 20 and a smoke developed rating of not more than 10 when tested in accordance with ASTM E 84 (incorporated by reference, see § 114.600) or UL 723 by an independent laboratory.
( c ) Bulkheads, linings, and ceilings in high risk accommodation spaces may have a combustible veneer trim and decorations that do not meet the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section, provided: ( 1 ) The overall thickness of the combustible veneer does not exceed 2 millimeters (.075 inches); and
( 2 ) The total volume of the combustible face trim, moldings, and decorations, including veneers, in any space does not exceed a volume equivalent to a 2.5 millimeter (0.1 inch) veneer on the combined area of the bulkheads and ceiling of the space.
( d ) Combustible veneers may not be used in passageways, stairway enclosures or in low risk accommodation spaces. Combustible veneers, trim and decorations may not be used in or extend into hidden spaces such as behind linings or ceilings.
( e ) Partial bulkheads or decks used to subdivide a space for artistic treatment and privacy must meet the requirements of Class C bulkheads.
( f ) Nothing in this subpart may be construed as prohibiting the covering of any surface, including the surfaces of corridors, stairway enclosures, and hidden spaces, with a reasonable number of coats of paint or with a marine finish meeting the requirements of § 164.012 in subchapter Q of this chapter or other standard specified by the Commandant.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 900, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51349, Sept. 30, 1997; USCG-2000-7790, 65 FR 58462, Sept. 29, 2000]
Case 2:15-cr-20007-LJM-DRG ECF No. 333, PageID.4763 Filed 03/15/22 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-20007-LJM-DRG ECF No. 333, PageID.4764 Filed 03/15/22 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-20007-LJM-DRG ECF No. 333, PageID.4765 Filed 03/15/22 Page 3 of 3
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 2, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-41494

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

LANDON RANNIER JONES

Defendant - Appellant

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:01-CR-199-1

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Landon Rannier Jones has appealed his convictions for

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute less than 100

grams of phencyclidine (“PCP”) and for possession with intent to

distribute less than 100 grams of PCP. Jones contends that the

district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence

seized during a traffic stop of a rental car in which he was a

passenger. Jones contends that the traffic stop was not
No. 02-41494

-2-

justified at its inception and that the scope of his detention

exceeded the permissible purpose of the stop. 

The arresting officers testified at the suppression hearing

that they stopped the vehicle because they observed two traffic

violations, failure to signal a lane change and failure to

maintain a single lane. Jones argues that the evidence did not

show that the failure of the driver to maintain a single lane was

unsafe or dangerous. Without such a showing, he contends, no

state law violation was shown. We need not resolve this

question, because the driver’s failure to signal a lane change

provided an adequate basis for stopping the vehicle. See United

States v. Roberson, 6 F.3d 1088, 1091–92 (5th Cir. 1993); see

also TEX. TRANS. CODE ANN. § 545.104 (West 1999). The arresting

officer articulated facts during the suppression hearing from

which he could have concluded reasonably that Jones had committed

or was committing a crime. Accordingly, Jones’s continued

detention did not violate the Fourth Amendment. See United

States v. Jones, 234 F.3d 234, 241 (5th Cir. 2000). 

Jones contends also that the evidence of his guilt was 

insufficient. Because Jones did not move for judgment of

acquittal in the district court, our review is limited to a

determination whether Jones’s “convictions resulted in a manifest

miscarriage of justice, which exists only if the record is devoid

of evidence pointing to guilt or if the evidence on a key element

of the offense is so tenuous that a conviction would be
No. 02-41494

-3-

shocking.” United States v. Smith, 203 F.3d 884, 887–88 (5th

Cir. 2000) (internal quotation marks omitted). There was ample

evidence presented at trial showing that Jones conspired with his

codefendants to distribute PCP and that Jones possessed PCP with

intent to distribute. The convictions are 

AFFIRMED.
#### § 169.505 Equipment installed but not required.

Each item of lifesaving equipment installed on board a vessel must be of an approved type.
# C_2012138EN.01004003.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/40

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 19 September 2011 — Mariën v Commission

(Case F-5/11) (1)

(2012/C 138/101)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 139, 7.5.2011, p. 30.

---
# C_2014380EN.01000801.xml

| 27.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 380/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 380/8

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2014 — Galileo International Technology v OHIM — ESA and Commission (GALILEO)

(Case T-450/11) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark GALILEO - Earlier Community word marks GALILEO - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - No similarity between the goods and services at issue))

2014/C 380/09

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Galileo International Technology LLC (Bridgetown, Barbados) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, M. Blair and K. Gilbert, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, interveners before the General Court: European Commission (represented by: J. Samnada and F. Wilman, acting as Agents); European Space Agency (ESA) (Paris, France) (represented by: M. Buydens, lawyer)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, interveners before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 April 2011 (Case R 1423/2005-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Galileo International Technology LLC and the European Union.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Galileo International Technology LLC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by OHIM; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Galileo International Technology LLC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by OHIM;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission and the European Space Agency to bear their own respective costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission and the European Space Agency to bear their own respective costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 298, 8.10.2011.

1

---
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2073 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to permit the State of West Virginia 

to allow the operation of certain vehicles for the hauling of coal and 

coal by-products on Interstate Route 77 in Kanawha County, West Virginia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2009 

Mrs. CAPITO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to permit the State 

of West Virginia to allow the operation of certain vehicles 

for the hauling of coal and coal by-products on Interstate 

Route 77 in Kanawha County, West Virginia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VEHICLE WEIGHT LIMITATIONS—INTERSTATE 

4 SYSTEM. 

5 Section 127(a) of title 23, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(13) The State of West Virginia may allow, by 

8 special permit, the operation of vehicles with a gross 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2073 IH

1 vehicle weight of up to 126,000 pounds, and with 

2 loads conforming to such single axle, tandem axle, 

3 and bridge formula limits as may be established by 

4 the State, for the hauling of coal and coal by-prod5 ucts on Interstate Route 77 in Kanawha County, 

6 West Virginia, between Exits 85 and 97.’’. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 22 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to reduce the amount 

that the United States Postal Service is required to 

pay into the Postal Service Retiree Health Benefits Fund 

by the end of fiscal year 2009. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 22 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Postal 

3 Service Financial Relief Act of 2009’’. 

4 SEC. 2. GOVERNMENT CONTRIBUTIONS FOR POSTAL ANNU5 ITANTS’ HEALTH BENEFITS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (iii) of section 

7 8909a(d)(3)(A) of title 5, United States Code, is amended 

8 to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(iii) $1,400,000,000, not later than September 

10 30, 2009;’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enact13 ment of section 803(a)(1)(B) of the Postal Accountability 

14 and Enhancement Act (Public Law 109–435; 120 Stat. 

15 3251). 

16 SEC. 3. TECHNICAL CORRECTION. 

17 The heading for section 8909a of title 5, United 

18 States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘BENEFIT’’ and in19 serting ‘‘BENEFITS’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 15, 

2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 22 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to reduce the 

2009. Health Benefits Fund by the end of fiscal year required to pay into the Postal Service Retiree amount that the United States Postal Service is
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 151.03-36 Liquid.

In this part *liquid* includes liquefied and compressed gases.

[CGD 81-101, 52 FR 7777, Mar. 12, 1987]
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STEVEN A. THOMPSON BRAD HENRY 

### OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENTOF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Governor Execulive Director
February 22,2008
KochNitrogen Co. Attn: Mr. Cody Greenfield 1619 S. 78th. Enid, OK 73072

.Subject: Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Waiver EnidNitrogen Plant DearMr. Greenfield: The Oklahoma Department ofEnvironmental Quality (ODEQ) received a BART waiver request for the**reference~** site onDecember 1, 2006.
. After the technical review, the ODEQ is approving a waiver for the Enid Plant. This waiver is based on facility BART sources which are not expecte4 to cause or contribute to 'visibility impacts at Class I areas based on submittedmodeling. While ODEQ has approved the waiver, the waiver is subject to EPA andpublic comment during the Regional Haze State ImplementationProgram (SIP) approval process. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Ifwe may be offurther service, please contact Phillip Fielder (405) 702-4100.

707 NORTH ROBINSON, P.O. BOX 1677, OKlAHOMA CITY, OKlAHOMA 73101 c1677 printed on recycled paperwith soy ink 

# o
PROB 35 Report and Order Terminating Supervised Release 

(Rev. 5/01) Prior to Original Expiration Date

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

v. Crim. No. 14-CR-20390-01 

Toriano Smith 

On February 11, 2014, the above named was placed on Supervised Release for a period of five years. 

The supervised releasee has complied with the rules and regulations of supervised release and is no longer in 

need of supervision. It is accordingly recommended that the supervised releasee be discharged from 

supervision. 

Respectfully submitted, 

s/Eric S. Olmstead 

U.S. Probation Officer 

ORDER OF COURT

Pursuant to the above report, it is ordered that the supervised releasee be discharged from supervision and 

that the proceedings in the case be terminated. 

Dated this 14th day of July , 20 17 . 

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

Thomas L. Ludington

United States District Judge

Case 1:14-cr-20390-TLL ECF No. 4 filed 07/14/17 PageID.18 Page 1 of 1