alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ANNA M. LAWSON ET UX., PLAINTIFFS, v. WEST JERSEY AND SEASHORE RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT.

Decided January 16, 1929.

Before Gummere, Chief Justice, and Justices Paekee and. Katzenbaoh.

Eor the rule, *Bourgeois & Coulomb.*

Contra, *William C. French.*

Pee Curiam.

This suit was instituted by Mrs. Lawson and her husband against the defendant railroad company, the former seeking to recover compensation for injuries she received while alight-ing from a train at the South Camden station, in the city of Camden, and her husband seeking compensation for the expenses to which he was put by reason of his wife’s injuries and for the loss of her services.. The trial resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, the jury awarding Mrs. Lawson the sum of $1,500, and her husband the sum of $300. The contention on the part of the defendant made upon the argument of the present rule is that the finding of the jury was contrary to the weight of the evidence on the question of liability.

The story of Mrs. Lawson was that as she was in the act of stepping off the train, which had stopped for the purpose of discharging passengers, it suddenly started up, throwing her *117to the ground, thus inflicting upon her the injuries for which she sued. Her son and her grandson were passengers on the train, and the son corroborated her story as to the starting of the train while she was in the act of alighting. On the other hand, a large number of witnesses were called, several of them absolutely disinterested, who testified that the plaintiff had not got out of the body of the car before the signal was given for the train to start, and that after it had started she came out upon the platform and attempted to alight, her son and grandson having already left the car, and that in attempting to do this she fell and received the injuries of which she now complains.

A careful reading of, the proofs sent up with the rule satisfies us that the contention of the defendant is entirely justified; that the verdict of the jury was the result of sympathy felt for the plaintiff, and was in plain disregard of the preponderance of the proof submitted to it for its consideration.

The rule to show cause will be made absolute.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00299-CR

NO. 03-05-00300-CR

NO. 03-05-00301-CR

NO. 03-05-00302-CR

NO. 03-05-00303-CR

NO. 03-05-00304-CR

NO. 03-05-00305-CR

NO. 03-05-00306-CR

NO. 03-05-00307-CR

Dustin McManus, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOS. 3032130, 3032131, 3032132, 3032133, 3032134, 3032135, 3032136, 3032137 & 2034490

HONORABLE BOB PERKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

In each of these causes, Dustin McManus seeks to appeal from a judgment of

conviction for aggravated assault. The sentences were imposed on November 9, 2004. There was

a timely motion for new trial. The deadline for perfecting appeal was therefore February 7, 2005.

Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2). The notices of appeal were filed on May 24, 2005. Under the

circumstances, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeals in any manner other than by
2

dismissing them for want of jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App.

1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).

The appeals are dismissed.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Pemberton

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: June 14, 2005

Do Not Publish
Martin, Michael (OST) DOT-OSTT'SLOCDQ ^ VV^: 5^) 

From: Matthew Misurda [mmisurda@conncast.net] 

Sent: . . .' Thursday, April 22,2010 10:23 AM 

To: EAS (OST) 

Subject: Commuter Service for Johnstown/Cambria County, PA Airport 

Please consider retaining Colgan Air as the commuter provider for the Johnstown/Cambria County, PA Airport. It is 

essential to the economic development of Greater Johnstown that we have a service that offers early and late day flights 

to Dulles for business purposes, as well as other important travel. Hopefully in the near future flights can be added to 

Pittsburgh for the same reasons and also to improve on our fine quality of life in Johnstown. 

Thank you. 

Rev. Matthew Misurda 

C"~3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting  will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections  552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential  trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals  associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of  personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities Special Emphasis Panel Loan Repayment Program for Health Disparities Research-Panel C.                    

*Date:*                         May 20, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         9 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6706 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Lorrita Watson, PhD, National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20892-5465, (301) 402-1366,                         *watsonl@ncmhd.nih.gov.*

Dated: April 11, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-1890  Filed 4-17-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
----

The Kahului dredged material disposal site is located inshore (south) of a breach in the submerged, high-backscatter reef.  Compare to Plates 5 and 6 and Figures 19 and 20 for details of the submarine topography.  Note the sparse nature of the high-backscatter dredged material and the occurence of high-backscatter submerged reefs that were formed during ancient low-stands of sea level.  Sun Illumination for land: azimuth 345 degrees;  angle 45 degrees.

*go to larger versionof Figure 18 (4.5MB)**go to metadata for this field activity, A-1-98-HW*

----

----

----

SusanA. Cochran

U.S. Department of the Interior,U.S.Geological Survey,Western RegionCoastal and Marine Geology
§ 121.220 Cooking equipment. ( a ) Doors on a cooking appliance must be provided with hinges and locking devices to prevent accidental opening in heavy seas.
( b ) A cooking appliance must be installed to prevent movement in heavy seas.
( c ) For a grill or similar type of cooking appliance, means must be provided to collect grease or fat and to prevent its spillage on wiring or the deck.
( d ) Grab rails must be installed on a cooking appliance when determined by the cognizant OCMI to be necessary for safety.
( e ) Sea rails, with suitable barriers to prevent accidental movement of cooking pots, must be installed on a cooking range.
( f ) Electric connections for a cooking appliance must be dripproof.
[CGD 85-080, 61 FR 933, Jan. 10, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 51352, Sept. 30, 1997]
SUPREME COURT.

#### Ambrose Young agt. Russel Allyn.

*Seventh District,*

*June Special Term,*1873.

In an action intended to he for fraud, and the summons is for *relief,*the plaintiff hy his complaint on a promissory note only is entitled to tho same *costs*only as if he had properly commenced his action hy summons for money where the defendant fails to answer.

The plaintiff, intending to bring an action for false and fraudulent representations, issued a summons for relief under subdivision 2 of section 129 of the Code, but, after appearance by the defendant, complained upon a promissory note. He recovered judgment, and, upon the taxation of his costs, the clerk of Ontario county, against the objection of the defendant, allowed twenty-five dollars for proceedings before notice of trial. The defendant moves to reduce the amount so allowed to fifteen dollars.

H. R. Dureee, *for the motion.*

I. The amount of costs to be allowed the plaintiff for proceedings before notice of trial depends upon the nature of the action, and not on the form of the summons (Code, § 307; *Pardee*agt. Schenck, 11 *How. Pr. R.,*500).

II. A summons for relief is proper in any case, ahd without variance a plaintiff may set out any cause of action *(Hewson*agt. Decker, 29 *How. Pr. R.,*385). But the form of the summons does not and cannot confer any additional rights on the plaintiff *(McCoun*agt. *N. Y. C. and H. R. R. R. Co.,*50 *N. Y.,*176; *Cobb*agt. *Dunkin,*19 *How. Pr. R.,*164; *Brown*agt. *Eaton,*37 *id.,*325).

*443III. The right to costs is a substantial right, and an order affecting it is appealable *(Burhans*agt. *Tibbitts,*7 *How. Pr. R.,*75; *Utter*agt. *Gifford,*25 *id.,*289). But the form of the summons does not affect a substantial right *(McCoun*agt. *N. Y. C. and H. R. R. R. Co., supra).*The form of the summons cannot, therefore, affect the right to costs.

D. Herron, *against the motion,*cited *Code,*§ 307, *Hewson*agt. *Decker*(29 *How. Pr. R.,*385), and claimed that the plaintiff in a summons for relief is obliged to apply to the court for judgment, and is therefore entitled to twenty-five dollars costs for proceedings before notice of trial.

J. C. Smith, J.

Where a party commences an action on a money demand for a specified sum by summons for relief, and thus voluntarily and unnecessarily puts himself in a position where he must apply to the court for judgment on the defendant’s failure to answer, he is entitled to the same costs only as if he had properly commenced his action by summons for money.

Motion granted.
No. 2949.

#### R. S. Parsons *v.*The State.

Opinion delivered October 20, 1888.

Obstructing Public Road—Term Defined—Pact Case.—To constitute the offense of obstructing a public road, it must appear from the evidence that the obstruction was “wilfully” erected. “Wilful,” in legal parlance, means “with legal malice;” “an evil intent,” or the performing of an act without reasonable ground to believe it to be lawful. In this case the State proved the location of the road, and the fact that the accused obstructed it by building a fence across it; and further that, when notified to remove it as an'obstruetion, the accused stated that he would remove it at once upon being convinced that his fence was not on his own land and crossed a public road. The defense proved that before he built the fence the accused had the land surveyed, and, according to the survey, built the said fence on his own land. Held, insufficient to support a conviction for *wilfully*obstruct" ing a public road.

Appeal from the County Court of Titus. Tried below before the Hon. J. R. Riddle, County Judge.

This conviction was for wilfully obstructing a public road, and the penalty assessed was a fine of one dollar and costs.

The syllabus and the opinion sufficiently state the substance of the evidence.

*G. F. Conley*and *S. P. Pounders,*for the appellant.

*W. L. Davidson,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

White, Presiding Judge.

Before appellant built his fence, which, it is alleged, obstructed the public road, he had the lines of his lands surveyed, and, according to said survey, built his fence upon his own land. ' If he believed that the land was his when he built the fence, then he can not be guilty of the offense of which he has been convicted, because the statutory crime is made to consist mainly in the fact that the act was “wilfully” committed, and the word “wilful” means legal malice, an evil intent, or without reasonable ground to believe the act to be lawful. (Willson’s Crim. Stats., sec. 685.)

The evidence as presented in the record fails to sustain the judgment, and it is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed and*remanded.
Title 40: Protection of Environment

PART 51 — REQUIREMENTS FOR PREPARATION, ADOPTION, AND SUBMITTAL OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Subpart X— Provisions for Implementation of 8 - hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard **§51.918 Can any S**  **IP planning requirements be suspended in 8 -**  **hour ozone nonattainment areas that have air quality data that meets the NAA**  **QS?** Upon a determination by EPA that an area designated nonattainment for the 8 - hour ozone NAAQS has attained the standard, the requireme nts for such area to submit attainment demonstrations and associated reasonably available control measures, reasonable further progress plans, contingency me asures, and other planning SIPs related to attainment of the 8 - hour ozone NAAQS shall be suspended until such time as: the area is redesignated to attainment, at which time the requirements no longer apply;

or EPA determines that the area has violated the 8 - hour ozone NAAQS. 

### [70 FR 71702, Nov. 29, 2005]
§ 117.75 Life jacket lights. ( a ) Each life jacket carried on a vessel on an oceans, coastwise, or Great Lakes route, must have a life jacket light approved in accordance with Subpart 161.012 of this chapter. Each life jacket light must be securely attached to the front shoulder area of the life jacket.
( b ) Notwithstanding the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, life jacket lights are not required for life jackets on: ( 1 ) Ferries; and
( 2 ) Vessels with Certificates of Inspection endorsed only for routes that do not extend more than 20 miles from a harbor of safe refuge.
PUBLIC LAW 112–47—NOV. 7, 2011 125 STAT. 541 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1843: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 157 (2011): 

July 28, 30, considered and passed House. 

Oct. 20, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 112–47 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 489 Army 

Drive in Barrigada, Guam, as the ‘‘John Pangelinan Gerber Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JOHN PANGELINAN GERBER POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 489 Army Drive in Barrigada, Guam, shall be 

known and designated as the ‘‘John Pangelinan Gerber Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘John Pangelinan Gerber Post Office Building’’. 

Approved November 7, 2011. 

Nov. 7, 2011 

[H.R. 1843] 


anorris on DSK5R6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Artificial Life, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eberhard
Schoeneburg, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

                                    /s/ Eberhard Schoeneburg

                                        Eberhard Schoeneburg
                                        Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Principal Financial Officer

November 14, 2005
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**Section1350 Certification**

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, the undersigned officer of Nextera Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”)hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(i)  the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Reportfairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
| Date: August 13, 2007 |   |                          |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                  |   |                          |
|                  | By:    | /s/ Joseph J. Millin          |   |
|                  |   | President                     |
|                  |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

----
Editorial Note on Part 46
Editorial Note: The Department of Health and Human Services issued a notice of waiver regarding the requirements set forth in part 46, relating to protection of human subjects, as they pertain to demonstration projects, approved under section 1115 of the Social Security Act, which test the use of cost—sharing, such as deductibles, copayment and coinsurance, in the Medicaid program. For further information see 47 FR 9208, Mar. 4, 1982.

§ 46.406 Research involving greater than minimal risk and no prospect of direct benefit to individual subjects, but likely to yield generalizable knowledge about the subject's disorder or condition. HHS will conduct or fund research in which the IRB finds that more than minimal risk to children is presented by an intervention or procedure that does not hold out the prospect of direct benefit for the individual subject, or by a monitoring procedure which is not likely to contribute to the well-being of the subject, only if the IRB finds that: ( a ) The risk represents a minor increase over minimal risk;
( b ) The intervention or procedure presents experiences to subjects that are reasonably commensurate with those inherent in their actual or expected medical, dental, psychological, social, or educational situations;
( c ) The intervention or procedure is likely to yield generalizable knowledge about the subjects' disorder or condition which is of vital importance for the understanding or amelioration of the subjects' disorder or condition; and
( d ) Adequate provisions are made for soliciting assent of the children and permission of their parents or guardians, as set forth in § 46.408.
§ 16.210 Pre-employment testing requirements. ( a ) No marine employer shall engage or employ any individual to serve as a crewmember unless the individual passes a chemical test for dangerous drugs for that employer.
( b ) An employer may waive a pre-employment test required for a job applicant by paragraph (a) of this section if the individual provides satisfactory evidence that he or she has: ( 1 ) Passed a chemical test for dangerous drugs, required by this part, within the previous six months with no subsequent positive drug tests during the remainder of the six-month period; or
( 2 ) During the previous 185 days been subject to a random testing program required by § 16.230 for at least 60 days and did not fail or refuse to participate in a chemical test for dangerous drugs required by this part.
[CGD 90-053, 58 FR 31107, May 28, 1993, as amended by CGD 93-051, 59 FR 28792, June 3, 1994]
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.334 Bilge pumping systems. ( a ) A cargo pumproom must have a bilge pumping system.
( b ) The bilge pumping system must have: ( 1 ) Complete remote operating controls outside the cargo pumproom; and
( 2 ) An alarm that operates when the depth of liquid in the bilges exceeds 50 cm (approx. 19.7 in.).
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2073 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2073

  To amend title 23, United States Code, to permit the State of West 
Virginia to allow the operation of certain vehicles for the hauling of 
  coal and coal by-products on Interstate Route 77 in Kanawha County, 
                             West Virginia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2009

 Mrs. Capito introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 23, United States Code, to permit the State of West 
Virginia to allow the operation of certain vehicles for the hauling of 
  coal and coal by-products on Interstate Route 77 in Kanawha County, 
                             West Virginia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VEHICLE WEIGHT LIMITATIONS--INTERSTATE SYSTEM.

    Section 127(a) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(13) The State of West Virginia may allow, by special 
        permit, the operation of vehicles with a gross vehicle weight 
        of up to 126,000 pounds, and with loads conforming to such 
        single axle, tandem axle, and bridge formula limits as may be 
        established by the State, for the hauling of coal and coal by-
        products on Interstate Route 77 in Kanawha County, West 
        Virginia, between Exits 85 and 97.''.
                                 <all>
```