alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fw: Revised package RobertJ Wayland to: Cortney_Higgins 11/16/2012 10:28 AM Cc: Bill Maxwell, tsirigotis.peter

Cortney -

Attached below are three (3) files:

(1) 75% CPMS Memo

(2) Revised preamble/regulatory text

(3) Redline of preamble/regulatory text off of what was originally submitted to you via ROCIS versus the current state of the package.

Please let me know if you have any further edits/concerns, and we'll work to get the addresses asap.

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290 Fax: (919) 541-5450

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

********************************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

********************************************************* ----- Forwarded by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US on 11/16/2012 10:26 AM

-----

From: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Pamela Garrett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 11/16/2012 10:20 AM Subject: Revised package75 percent CPMS operating limit_111612.pdf

EO12866_MATS_Reconsideration_2060- AR62_Proposal_20121116.pdf

EO12866 redline 110612 vs 111612.pdf

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-5430 FAX: 919-541-5450
#### §§ 83.16-83.19 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2047 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2047

To authorize appropriations for Operation Stonegarden of the Department 
                         of Homeland Security.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 2009

 Mr. McCaul (for himself, Mr. Cuellar, Mr. Olson, Mr. Bilbray, and Mr. 
  Marchant) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize appropriations for Operation Stonegarden of the Department 
                         of Homeland Security.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR OPERATION STONEGARDEN.

    There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Homeland 
Security $500,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014 to 
carry out Operation Stonegarden.
                                 <all>
```
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45620

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

JEREMIAH JAMES FAULKENBERRY ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Filed: July 3, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho, Kootenai County. Hon. John T. Mitchell , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of four years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years, for possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine, affirmed

. Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Jenny C. Swinford

, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERR EZ, Judge; HUSKEY, Judge; and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM Jeremiah James Faulkenberry pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance,
methamphetamine , Idaho Code § 37

- 2732(c)(1) . The district court imposed a unified sentence of four years, with two years determinate, and retained jurisdiction

. Faulkenberry appeals,
contending that his sentence is excessive. Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-2 15 (C t. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. Sta te v. Oliver , 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Faulkenberry ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
H. R. 1817 

One Hundred Eleventh Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 116 North 

West Street in Somerville, Tennessee, as the ‘‘John S. Wilder Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JOHN S. WILDER POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 116 North West Street in Somerville, Tennessee, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘John S. Wilder Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘John S. Wilder Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, James G. Jennings III, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of 21st Century Holding
Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
         is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
         this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: November 14, 2003.

/s/ J. G. Jennings, III
Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 147
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 147 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59782, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 147.1 Purpose and applicability. ( a ) This part prescribes regulations designating what hazardous materials may be on board vessels as ships' stores and prescribes requirements for the labeling, stowage, and use of those materials.
( b ) This part applies to all vessels listed in 46 U.S.C. 3301 as subject to inspection under part B of 46 U.S.C. Subtitle II. On foreign vessels in the navigable waters of the United States, the Captain of the Port or District Commander may prohibit the unsafe use or stowage of hazardous ships' stores under 33 CFR 160.109.
( c ) All certifications previously issued by the Coast Guard under this part permitting the use of particular materials or products as ships' stores are null and void.
( d ) The regulations in this subchapter (46 CFR parts 147, 147A, and 148) have preemptive effect over State or local regulations in the same field.
[CGD 84-044, 53 FR 7749, Mar. 10, 1988, as amended by USCG-2006-24797, 77 FR 33885, June 7, 2012; USCG-2012-0196, 81 FR 48272, July 22, 2016]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William W. Harrod, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                   |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|DATE: May 13, 2005 |  | BY: |  | /s/ William W. Harrod                
|                   |  |     |  | William W. Harrod                    
|                   |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                   |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 11 (Thursday, January 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-180]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


National Research Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the National Research 
Advisory Council will hold a meeting on Thursday, February 1, 2007, in 
room 900 at the Greenhoot Cohen Building, 1722 I Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The meeting will convene at 8 a.m. and conclude at 3 
p.m. The meeting is open to the public. The purpose of the Council is 
to provide external advice and review for VA's research mission.
    The agenda will include a review of the VA research portfolio and a 
summary of current budget allocations. The Council will also provide 
feedback on the direction/focus of VA's research initiatives.
    Any member of the pubic wishing to attend the meeting or wishing 
further information should contact Jay A. Freedman, PhD., Designated 
Federal Officer, at (202) 254-0267. Oral comments from the public will 
not be accepted at the meeting. Written statements or comments should 
be transmitted electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a9c3c8d087cfdbcccccdc4c8c7e9dfc887cec6df"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4329223a6d25312626272e222d0335226d242c35">[email protected]</span></a> or mailed to Dr. 
Freedman at Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Research and 
Development (12), 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420.

    Dated: January 8, 2007.
    By Direction of the Secretary.
E. Phillip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-180 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

                            Certification pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      Michael R. Kallet,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer,  and Eric E.
Stickels,  Executive  Vice  President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of Oneida
Financial Corp. (the  "Company"),  each certify in his capacity as an officer of
the Company  that he has reviewed  the  Quarterly  Report of the Company on Form
10-Q for the  quarter  ended  March  31,  2005  and that to the best of  his/her
knowledge:

(6)   the report fully complies with the  requirements  of Sections 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(7)   the information  contained in the report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


    May 12, 2005                           /s/ Michael R. Kallet
--------------------                       ------------------------------------
Date                                       President and Chief Executive Officer


    May 12, 2005                           /s/ Eric E. Stickels
--------------------                       ------------------------------------
Date                                       Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
•

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 46

Technical Corrections; Identification and Listing

of Hazardous Waste

53 FR 13382-13393

April 22, 1988

(Non-HSWA Cluster IV)

Note: This checklist makes extensive technical corrections to the lists of

commercial chemical products that are hazardous wastes when discarded (40 CFR

261.33(e) and (f» and to the list of hazardous constituents (Appendix VIII of 40

CFR Part 261). Because these same lists are also addressed by Revision Checklist

29, States may seek authorization for this checklist without the need to first

obtain authorization for Checklist 29.

STATE ANALOC IS:

FEDERAL

REQUIREMENT

FEDERAL

RCRA

CITATION

ANALOGOUS

STATE

CITATION

EQUIVALENT

MORE BROADSTRIN- ER IN

GENT SCOPE

•

PART 261 - IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE

SUBPART D - LISTS OF HAZARDOUS WASTES

DISCARDED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS, OFF-SPECIFICATION SPECIES,

CONTAINER RESIDUES, AND SPILL RESIDUES THEREOF WAC 173-303

correct specific

listings 261. 33{e) -9903 X

correct specific

listings 261. 33{f) -9903 X

APPENDIX VIII TO PART 261

HAZARDOUS CONSTITUENTS

add hazardous

waste numbers Appendix VIII

WAC 173-303

-9905 (numbers not added)

• April 22, 1988 - Page 1 of 1
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

 OF FLORIDA 

 SECOND DISTRICT 

ALAN D. WHITE, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No: 2D14-2276 

 ) 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

 ) 

Opinion filed February 4, 2015. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Catherine L. Combee, Judge. 

Alan D. White, pro se. 

WALLACE, Judge. 

 Alan D. White filed a letter with the postconviction court contending that 

his written judgment does not accurately reflect one of the crimes to which he entered a 

plea of no contest. Mr. White pleaded no contest to two offenses. One of these 

offenses was "fleeing and eluding (high speed)," a violation of section 316.1935(3)(a), 

Florida Statutes (2013). The judgment and sentence characterize this offense as 

"aggravated fleeing and eluding," which is a violation of section 316.1935(4)(a), a 

different offense. 
- 2 - 

 The postconviction court treated Mr. White's letter as a motion filed under 

Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) and denied the motion. A motion to correct 

any sentencing error may be filed under rule 3.800(b)(1) during the time allowed for the 

filing of a notice of appeal, or, under rule 3.800(b)(2), while an appeal is pending. When 

Mr. White filed his letter, the time for filing an appeal had expired. It follows that Mr. 

White's judgment and sentence were final; thus rule 3.800(b) was inapplicable. In 

addition, the trial court could not treat the letter as a motion for postconviction relief 

under rule 3.8501 because the letter did not conform to the requirements of rule

3.850(c). The postconviction court should have treated Mr. White's letter as a motion to 

correct an illegal sentence under rule 3.800(a). 

 We affirm the order denying Mr. White's motion because his letter did not 

establish that his sentences were illegal. Our affirmance of the postconviction court's 

order is without prejudice to Mr. White's right to raise the issue of the inaccuracy of the 

judgment's description of the crime to which he pleaded no contest in a timely motion 

filed in accordance with rule 3.850. 

 Affirmed without prejudice. 

ALTENBERND and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur. 

 

 1A defendant may file a motion challenging a judgment under rule 3.850 

within two years after the judgment and sentence become final. Fla. R. Crim. P. 

3.850(b).
#### § 127.330 Guards in dangerous places.

Suitable hand covers, guards, or rails must be installed on each exposed and dangerous place, such as gears of rotating machinery, and hot surfaces.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

NATHANIEL HINES, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cv-13619 

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

 Magistrate Stephanie Dawkins Davis 

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, et al., 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S 

COMPLAINT 

On September 17, 2014, Plaintiff Nathaniel Hines filed a Complaint against Defendants 

alleging he was involuntarily injected with anti-psychotic medication in violation of the Eighth 

Amendment and his due process rights. Compl., ECF No. 1. On February 10, 2016, Defendants 

filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 44. On August 22, 2016, Magistrate Judge Davis issued a 

report recommending that the Defendant’s motion to dismiss be granted and that Plaintiff’s 

complaint be dismissed. ECF No. 49. The Magistrate Judge’s report found that Plaintiff’s claims 

against the Michigan Department of Corrections was barred by the Eleventh Amendment. The 

Magistrate Judge also found that Plaintiff failed to state a viable Eighth Amendment claim 

because he failed to allege that the prison doctors provided grossly inadequate care. The report 

further found that Plaintiff did not state a claim for deprivation of liberty without due process of 

law. Finally, the Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff’s claims were barred by qualified 

immunity. 

1:14-cv-13619-TLL-SDD Doc # 54 Filed 09/23/16 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 593
- 2 - 

Although the Magistrate Judge’s report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may 

object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, 

neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the 

Magistrate Judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and 

recommendation waives any further right to appeal. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, 

ECF No. 49, is ADOPTED. 

 It is further ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss, ECF No. 44, is GRANTED. 

 It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED.

Dated: September 23, 2016 s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

 

 

PROOF OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on September 23, 2016. 

 s/Michael A. Sian 

 MICHAEL A. SIAN 

1:14-cv-13619-TLL-SDD Doc # 54 Filed 09/23/16 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 594
# C_2008251EN.01000901.xml

| 3.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/9

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant positions given at its meeting of 30 November 2007 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/38.629 — Chloroprene Rubber (2)

Rapporteur: France

(2008/C 251/05)

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agree with the Commission on the basic amount of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agree with the Commission on the basic amount of the fines.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agree with the Commission on the increase of the basic amount due to aggravating circumstances. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agree with the Commission on the increase of the basic amount due to aggravating circumstances.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agree with the Commission on the increase of the basic amount to ensure a sufficient deterrent effect. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agree with the Commission on the increase of the basic amount to ensure a sufficient deterrent effect.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agree with the Commission on the reductions of the fines based on the 2002 Leniency Notice. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agree with the Commission on the reductions of the fines based on the 2002 Leniency Notice.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee agree with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee agree with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines.

| 6. | The Advisory Committee recommend the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The Advisory Committee recommend the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
724.53503