alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 131.220 Drafts. ( a ) Each vessel must have the drafts of the vessel plainly and legibly marked upon the stem and upon the sternpost or rudderpost, or at any place at the stern of the vessel that may be necessary for easy observance. The bottom of each mark must indicate the draft.
( b ) Each draft must be taken from the bottom of the keel to the surface of the water at the location of the marks.
( c ) When, because of raked stem or cutaway skeg, the keel does not extend forward or aft to the draft markings, the datum line from which the draft is taken must be the line of the bottom of the keel projected forward or aft, as the case may be, to where the line meets that of the draft markings projected downward.
( d ) When a skeg or other appendage extends below the line of the keel, the draft at the end of the vessel adjacent to that appendage must be measured to a line tangent to the lowest part of the appendage and parallel to the line of the bottom of the keel.
( e ) Drafts must be separated so that the projections of the marks onto a vertical plane are of uniform height, equal to the vertical spacing between consecutive marks.
( f ) Marks must be painted in a color contrasting with that of the hull.
( g ) Where marks are obscured because of operational constraints or by protrusions, the vessel must be fitted with a reliable draft-indicating system from which the drafts at bow and stern can be determined.
§ 126.130 Cranes. ( a ) Except as provided by paragraph (b) of this section, cranes, if installed, must comply with §§ 107.258 through 107.260, 108.601, 109.437, 109.439, 109.521, 109.525, and 109.527 of this chapter.
( b ) The manufacturer of a crane may have tests and inspections conducted in compliance with § 107.259 of this chapter, if the surveyor conducting them for the American Bureau of Shipping or the International Cargo Gear Bureau certifies their conduct as required by § 107.259(c) of this chapter.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of First Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael C. Frederick,
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|      |  |                   |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                          
|----- |  | ----------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|DATE: |  | November 13, 2009 |  |  |  | BY: |  | /s/ Michael C. Frederick                                                                                 
|      |  |                   |  |  |  |     |  | Michael C. Frederick                                                                                     
|      |  |                   |  |  |  |     |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6232

RALPH STAINO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief

District Judge. (5:04-hc-00962-FL)

Submitted: March 9, 2007 Decided: March 29, 2007

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ralph Staino, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ralph Staino, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)

petition and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Staino v. U.S. Parole

Comm’n, No. 5:04-hc-00962-FL (E.D.N.C. Dec. 5, 2005; Jan. 26,

2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2012013EN.01000202.xml

| 14.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/2

---

Appeal lodged on 31 May 2011 by Mariyus Noko Ngele against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 25 March 2011 in Case T-15/10 European Commission v AT, AU, AW, AW

(Case C-272/11 P)

2012/C 13/03

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Mariyus Noko Ngele (represented by: F. Sabakunzi, avocat)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, AT, AU, AV, AW

Other parties to the proceedings:

By order of 4 October 2011, the Court (Eighth Chamber) dismisses the appeal and orders Mr Noko Ngele to bear his own costs.

---
##### 



Exhibit 21
 Lucent Technologies do Brasil Indústria e Comércio Ltda.
    
    BrazilLucent Technologies Treasury Services
    
    IrelandLucent Technologies (China) Co., Ltd.
    
    P.R.C.Ascend Communications, Inc.
    
    USBell Laboratories, Inc.
    
    USFirst Beacon Insurance Company
    
    USLTI NJ Finance LLC
    
    USLucent Asset Management Corporation
    
    USLucent Technologies Integrated Solutions Inc.
    
    USLucent Technologies GRL LLC
    
    USLucent Technologies International Inc.
    
    USLucent Technologies World Services Inc.
    
    USNew Jersey Nanotechnology Consortium LLC
    
    USWestern Electric Company, Incorporated
    
    US
#### § 144.400 Applicability.

Except for § 144.415, which applies to each new and existing vessel, this subpart applies to each new towing vessel.
#### Theodore D. Holmes and another, Appellants, *v.*Augusta F. A. Winans, *Respondent*.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Colette Cozean, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Quarterly Report of SurgiLight, Incorporated on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of SurgiLight, Incorporated.

/s/ Colette Cozean
Colette Cozean
Chief Executive Officer
August 22, 2005


I, Stuart Michelson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Quarterly Report of SurgiLight, Incorporated on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of SurgiLight, Incorporated.

/s/ Stuart Michelson
Stuart Michelson
Chief Financial Officer
August 22, 2005
cgc-ex106_5046.htm



Exhibit 10.6

CANOPY GROWTH CORPORATION 

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

As of March 31, 2020

The directors1 of Canopy Growth Corporation shall receive the following applicable fees as previously recommended by the Corporate Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee (“CGCN Committee”) and approved by the Board, including RSUs (the “Director RSUs”):

 


		
	
FY2021 Fees
	
Annual Amount ($)

	
Board of Directors Chair Retainer
	
225,000

	
Annual Equity Grants to Board of Directors Chair- RSUs
	
225,000

	
Board Retainer
	
150,000

	
Annual Equity Grants to Non-Chair Board Members- RSUs
	
150,000

	
Audit Committee Chair Retainer
	
30,000

	
Audit Committee Member Retainer
	
15,000

	
CGCN Committee Chair Retainer
	
20,000

	
CGCN Committee Member Retainer
	
15,000





1Note that David Klein, Robert Hanson and William Newlands do not receive board fees.
#### § 111.79-11 Lifeboat receptacles.

Each receptacle outlet on a lifeboat for connection to a vessel's electrical system must allow the plug to pull free when the lifeboat is lowered.
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

Editorial Note on Subpart 151.50 of Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart 151.50 of part 151 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, and CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996.

§ 151.50-32 Ammonia, anhydrous. ( a ) The anhydrous ammonia tanks may be installed in the bulk liquid cargo tanks provided the liquid surrounding the enclosed anhydrous ammonia tanks complies with the following chemical and physical properties: ( 1 ) Boiling point above 125 °F atmospheric pressure.
( 2 ) Inert to ammonia at 100 °F at atmospheric pressure.
( 3 ) Noncorrosive in the liquid and vapor phase to the ammonia tanks and piping.
( b ) Copper, copper alloys, and copper bearing alloys shall not be used as materials of construction for tanks, pipelines, valves, fittings, and other items of equipment that may come in contact with anhydrous ammonia liquid or vapor.
( c ) Valves, flanges and pipe fittings shall be of the tongue and groove or raised-face type, fitted with suitable gasket material. Welded fittings shall be used wherever possible and the number of pipe joints shall be held to a minimum. Threaded joints are not permitted for pipe diameters exceeding 2 inches. Brazed joints are prohibited.
( d ) All enclosed spaces containing cargo tanks fitted with bottom outlet connections shall be provided with mechanical ventilation of sufficient capacity to assure a change of air every 3 minutes.
( e ) Each cargo tank shall be electrically grounded to the hull.
( f ) When transferring cargo, a hose shall be connected to a water supply so that if leakage of anhydrous ammonia occurs the vapor may be dispersed by the use of water fog. This requirement can be met by facilities provided from shore.
( g ) During cargo transfer operations, every person on the vessel shall carry on his person or have close at hand at all times a canister mask approved for ammonia or each person shall carry on his person a respiratory protective device which will protect the wearer against ammonia vapors and will provide respiratory protection for emergency escape from a contaminated area resulting from cargo leakage. This respiratory protective equipment shall be of such size and weight that the person wearing it will not be restricted in movement or in the wearing of a lifesaving device.
( h ) [Reserved]
( i ) The requirements of § 151.50-30 for compressed gases are also applicable to the shipment of anhydrous ammonia.
[CGFR 70-10, 35 FR 3714, Feb. 25, 1970, as amended by CGD 85-061, 54 FR 50966, Dec. 11, 1989]
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2131 Engrossed in House (EH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2131

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 to 
 reauthorize the United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF UNITED STATES ADVISORY COMMISSION ON 
              PUBLIC DIPLOMACY.

    Section 1334 of the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 
1998 (22 U.S.C. 6553) is amended by striking ``October 1, 2009'' and 
inserting ``October 1, 2010''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 23, 2009.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2131

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 to 
 reauthorize the United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy.
```
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**          I, J. Scott Blouin, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Conexant Systems,Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Conexant Systems, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this Quarterly Report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this Quarterly Report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Reportis being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this QuarterlyReport based on such evaluation; and  c. disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated: August 9, 2005   /s/ J. Scott Blouin J. Scott Blouin
Editorial Note on Subpart 113.25 of Part 113
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart 113.25 of part 113 appear by CGD-94-108, 61 FR 28288, June 4, 1996.

§ 113.25-12 Alarm signals. ( a ) Each general emergency alarm signal must be an electrically-operated bell, klaxon, or other warning device capable of producing a signal or tone distinct from any other audible signal on the vessel.
( b ) Electronic devices used to produce the general emergency alarm signal must meet the requirements of subpart 113.50 of this part.
( c ) ( 1 ) The minimum sound-pressure levels for the emergency-alarm tone in interior and exterior spaces must be a sound level of not less than 80 dB(A) measured at 10 feet on the axis; and
( 2 ) At least 10 dB(A) measured at 10 feet on the axis, above the background noise level when the vessel is underway in moderate weather unless flashing red lights are used in accordance with 46 CFR 113.25-10(b).
( d ) Alarm signals intended for use in sleeping compartments may have a minimum sound level of 75 dB(A) measured 3 feet (1 meter) on axis, and at least 10 dB(A) measured 3 feet (1 meter) on axis, above ambient noise levels with the ship under way in moderate weather.
[CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28289, June 4, 1996, as amended by USCG-2003-16300, 73 FR 65201, Oct. 31, 2008]
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59783, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 148.280 Magnesia, unslaked (lightburned magnesia, calcined magnesite, caustic calcined magnesite). ( a ) This part does not apply to the transport of natural magnesite, magnesium carbonate, or magnesia clinkers.
( b ) When transported by barge, unslaked magnesia must be carried in an unmanned, all-steel, double-hulled barge equipped with weathertight hatches or covers. The barge may not carry any other cargo while unslaked magnesia is on board.
( c ) The shipping paper requirements in § 148.60 of this part and the dangerous cargo manifest requirements in § 148.70 of this part do not apply to unslaked magnesia transported under the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael
C. Frederick, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                   |  |     |  |                                                             
|------------------ |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|DATE: May 13, 2011 |  | BY: |  | /s/ Michael C. Frederick                                    
|                   |  |     |  | Michael C. Frederick                                        
|                   |  |     |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|                   |  |     |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### GEORGE KIRCHNER, PLAINTIFF, v. JOSEPH SCHMITZBERGER, DEFENDANT.

Decided May 4, 1929.

Before Gummeee, Chief Justice, and Justice Parker.

Eor the rule, *Emile Neblo.*

Gonira, *Reynier J.*Wortendylce, *Jr.*

Pee Curiam.

The present suit was brought by the plaintiff, a young child, about five years old, to recover compensation for injuries received through being struck by an automobile of the defendant on Madison street, in the city of Hoboken. The trial resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, the jury awarding him $500. He now asks to have this verdict set aside on the ground that the award is inadequate.

A consideration of the character of the plaintiff’s injuries and the results thereof satisfies us that the sum awarded by the jury as compensation therefor is not so inadequate as to justify us in setting the verdict aside. ■

The rule to show cause will be discharged.
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

Editorial Note on Subpart 151.50 of Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart 151.50 of part 151 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, and CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996.

§ 151.50-40 Additional requirements for carbon disulfide (carbon bisulfide) and ethyl ether. ( a ) The provisions of this section are applicable if specifically referenced in the Special Requirements column of Table 151.05.
( b ) Cargo tanks shall be electrically bonded to the hull of the vessel. A vessel shall be electrically bonded to the shore piping prior to connecting the cargo hose. This electrical bonding shall be maintained until after the cargo hose has been disconnected and any spillage has been removed.
( c ) Pumps may be used for discharging cargo: *Provided,* That they are the vertical submerged type designed to avoid liquid pressure against the shaft gland and are suitable for use with the cargo.
( d ) Provisions shall be made to maintain an inert gas padding in the cargo tank during loading, unloading and during transit.
( e ) Provisions shall be made to prevent any leakage being washed into the waterways at the loading and unloading points.
( f ) The special requirements of § 151.50-41 for carbon disulfide (*carbon bisulfide*) and § 151.50-42 for ethyl ether shall also be observed.
[CGFR 70-10, 35 FR 3714, Feb. 25, 1970, as amended by CGD 88-100, 54 FR 40029, Sept. 29, 1989]
#### § 15.415 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Implant Sciences Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Glenn D. Bolduc, President, Chief Executive of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/Glenn D. BolducGlenn D. BolducPresident, Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 10, 2011







This certification accompanies each report of the Company on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by we for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or our staff upon request.