alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 23, 2016

t1122 

# Order

Clerk November 23, 2016

153921

MICHIGAN COMMERCE BANK, f/k/a

PORTAGE COMMERCE BANK,

Plaintiff/

Counterdefendant

- Appellee,

v SC: 153921

COA: 325299

Kalamazoo CC: 2013

- 000266

- CK

T.A. SCOTT CONSTRUCTION, INC., THOMAS

SCOTT, DEANNE SCOTT, and PARKWEST

DEVELOPMENT OF SCHOOLCRAFT, LLC,

Defendants/

Counterplaintiffs

- Appellants.

_________________________________________ /

On order of the Court, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to

the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the application for

leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
Exhibit 32.1


  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
   --------------------------------------------------------------
    PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
          --------------------------------------------



     I,   John  Vogel,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  President
(principal  executive  officer)  and  I,  Robert  Scherne,  Chief
Financial    Officer   (principal    financial    officer)     of
International  Imaging  Systems, Inc., (the  "Registrant"),  each
certify  to  the best of our knowledge, based upon a  review   of
the   quarterly  report  on Form 10-QSB for  the   quarter  ended
September 30, 2006 (the "Report") of the Registrant, that:

   (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934, as
       amended; and

   (2) the information  contained in the Report, fairly presents,
       in  all  material  respects, the  financial condition  and
       results of operations of the Registrant.


Date: November 15, 2006      By:/s/John Vogel
                                -------------------------------------
                                John Vogel
                                Chief Executive Officer and President

                             By:/s/Robert Scherne
                                ------------------------------------
                                Robert Scherne
                                Chief Financial Officer







<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 71 (Friday, April 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18667-18668]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1868]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-07-006]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date: April 19, 2007 at 11 a.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Agenda for future meetings: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. No. 731-TA-921 (Review) (Folding Gift Boxes from China)--
briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit 
its determination and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of 
Commerce on or before April 30, 2007.)
    5. Inv. Nos. 731-TA-707-709 (Second Review) (Certain Seamless 
Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from 
Argentina, Brazil, and Germany)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is 
currently scheduled to transmit its determination and Commissioners' 
opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before May 2, 2007).

[[Page 18668]]

    6. Outstanding action jackets: none.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: April 10, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-1868 Filed 4-11-07; 12:55 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.901 Documents: Posting, availability, and alteration. ( a ) No person may operate a United States ship unless the endorsed Certificate of Inspection is readily available on the ship.
( b ) No person may operate a foreign ship unless the endorsed Certificate of Compliance or Certificate of Inspection is readily available on the ship.
( c ) No person may operate a ship under an alternative or waiver granted under this part unless the document granting the alternative or waiver is attached to the ship's Certificate of Inspection or Certificate of Compliance.
( d ) Except as allowed in paragraph (e) of this section, the Coast Guard does not accept the following if altered: ( 1 ) Certificates of Inspection.
( 2 ) Certificates of Compliance.
( 3 ) Certificates of Fitness, unless the alteration is by the issuing authority.
( 4 ) Approved Procedures and Arrangements Manuals, unless the alteration is approved by the issuing authority.
( 5 ) NLS Certificates.
( e ) A person wishing to change a Procedures and Arrangements Manual approved by the Coast Guard must submit a copy to the Coast Guard following the procedures for requesting an endorsed Certificate of Inspection in § 153.8.
[CGD 81-101, 52 FR 7783, Mar. 12, 1987]
SERVED JUNE 23, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

EMPIRE AIRWAYS, 

Respondent 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10EA0002 

(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

DMS NO. FAA-2010-0191 

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S ORDER DISMISSING 

PROCEEDING AND CANCELLING HEARING 

Counsel for the Complainant has filed a motion to withdraw the 

complaint "without prejudice." He says that the agency has been informed 

that the party named as Respondent in the complaint did not operate and 

maintain the aircraft in question. He also says that the purpose of the 

withdrawal of the complaint is to allow the Federal Aviation Administration 

to initiate the case anew against another party. 

I cannot and do not promise that the Complainant's case against a 

third party (a case I do not have before me) will not be prejudiced by the fact 

that the Complainant filed this case against Empire Airways. The case 

against the third party does not exist and, in any event, is not assigned to me. 

If, for example, the statute of limitations on prosecution of the third party 

expired while this case was before me, dismissal of this case may be said to 

"prejudice" the interests of the FAA. There is nothing I can do about that, 

and counsel for the FAA will just have to take his chances. 

All that I can do now is to follow the dictate of §13.215 of the 

Procedural Rules, 14 C.F.R. § 13.215 and dismiss this case with prejudice. I 

now do so. 
The hearing scheduled to begin on August 12, 2010 is cancelled. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Isaac D. Benkin 

Administrative Law Judge 
FAA Docket No. CP10EA0002 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Charles J. Casolaro, Respondent's Counsel 

Casolaro Sussman, LLP 

1050 Franklin Avenue, Suite 402 

Garden City, NY 11530 

TEL: 516-248-1399 

FAX: 516-248-2257 

Zachary M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable Isaac D. Benkin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney 202-366-0437 

Legal Assistant 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0462

ROBERT EDWARD WALDEN

and SYLVAN WALDEN,

 Plaintiffs and Appellees,

 vs. 

YELLOWSTONE ELECTRIC CO.

and THOMAS C. NEWELL,

 Defendants and Appellants.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

IT IS ORDERED THAT Cori M. Cook, whose name appears next on the list of

attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which is 

maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this October 14, 2020.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Kelsey Evans Bunkers, Matthew F. McLean, Terrance Lee Toavs, Jesse Myers, 

Cori M. Cook

10/14/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0462
# C_2008249EN.01000601.xml

| 1.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/6

---

Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 27 Member States applicable as from 1 October 2008

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) 794/2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1))

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) 794/2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1))

(2008/C 249/04)

Base rates calculated in accordance with the Communication from the Commission on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates (OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p. 6). Depending on the use of the reference rate, the appropriate margins have still to be added as defined in this communication. For the discount rate this means that a margin of 100 basispoints has to be added. The Commission Regulation (EC) No 271/2008 of 30 January 2008 amending the implementing Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 foresees that, unless otherwise provided for in a specific decision, the recovery rate will also be calculated by adding 100 basispoints to the base rate.

| From | To | AT | BE | BG | CY | CZ | DE | DK | EE | EL | ES | FI | FR | HU | IE | IT | LT | LU | LV | MT | NL | PL | PT | RO | SE | SI | SK | UK |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.10.2008 | ... | 5,36 | 5,36 | 6,70 | 5,36 | 4,20 | 5,36 | 5,55 | 6,43 | 5,36 | 5,36 | 5,36 | 5,36 | 8,58 | 5,36 | 5,36 | 6,10 | 5,36 | 9,44 | 5,36 | 5,36 | 6,42 | 5,36 | 11,02 | 5,49 | 5,36 | 4,34 | 5,66 |
| 1.9.2008 | 30.9.2008 | 4,59 | 4,59 | 6,70 | 4,59 | 4,20 | 4,59 | 5,55 | 6,43 | 4,59 | 4,59 | 4,59 | 4,59 | 8,58 | 4,59 | 4,59 | 6,10 | 4,59 | 9,44 | 4,59 | 4,59 | 6,42 | 4,59 | 11,02 | 5,49 | 4,59 | 4,34 | 5,66 |
| 1.7.2008 | 31.8.2008 | 4,59 | 4,59 | 6,70 | 4,59 | 4,20 | 4,59 | 4,81 | 6,43 | 4,59 | 4,59 | 4,59 | 4,59 | 8,58 | 4,59 | 4,59 | 6,10 | 4,59 | 9,44 | 4,59 | 4,59 | 6,42 | 4,59 | 11,02 | 4,75 | 4,59 | 4,34 | 5,66 |

From

To

AT

BE

BG

CY

CZ

DE

DK

EE

EL

ES

FI

FR

HU

IE

IT

LT

LU

LV

MT

NL

PL

PT

RO

SE

SI

SK

UK

1.10.2008

...

5,36

5,36

6,70

5,36

4,20

5,36

5,55

6,43

5,36

5,36

5,36

5,36

8,58

5,36

5,36

6,10

5,36

9,44

5,36

5,36

6,42

5,36

11,02

5,49

5,36

4,34

5,66

1.9.2008

30.9.2008

4,59

4,59

6,70

4,59

4,20

4,59

5,55

6,43

4,59

4,59

4,59

4,59

8,58

4,59

4,59

6,10

4,59

9,44

4,59

4,59

6,42

4,59

11,02

5,49

4,59

4,34

5,66

1.7.2008

31.8.2008

4,59

4,59

6,70

4,59

4,20

4,59

4,81

6,43

4,59

4,59

4,59

4,59

8,58

4,59

4,59

6,10

4,59

9,44

4,59

4,59

6,42

4,59

11,02

4,75

4,59

4,34

5,66

---
#### SIDNEY COOPER, RESPONDENT, v. AL GOLDMAN, APPELLANT.

Decided July 29, 1929.

Before Justices Parker, Black and Bodine.

Eor the appellant, *Wallace P. Berkowilz.*

Fox the respondent, *Gross & Gross.*

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff’s assignor sold merchandise to the defendant on a contract, and when the time for payment arrived the defendant defaulted and an action in the Hudson County Court of Common Pleas was commenced.

The defendant answered, alleging the goods were defective and counter-claimed for breach of warranty. The plaintiff moved to strike the answer and counter-claim and for the entrance of summary judgment on the ground that the answer was false and the pleadings sham. The trial judge granted the plaintiff’s motion. Thirteen days after the motion was granted the defendant filed certain affidavits tending to show that it had a defense on the merits, and purporting to be in answer to the plaintiff’s motion affidavits. A notice of appeal, was also served. The trial judge expunged the defendant’s affidavits from the record.

*672Since the affidavits have been expunged from the record they are not before us, and there is nothing before us to show that they were before the 'trial judge or that the entry of summary judgment was not in all respects proper. *Larner*v. Montclair, 99 *N. J. L.*510; 2 *N. J. Adv. R.*411.

The judgment below will therefore be affirmed.
§ 75.364 Access to records. ( a ) *Records of non-Federal entities.* The HHS awarding agency, Inspectors General, the Comptroller General of the United States, and the pass-through entity, or any of their authorized representatives, must have the right of access to any documents, papers, or other records of the non-Federal entity which are pertinent to the Federal award, in order to make audits, examinations, excerpts, and transcripts. The right also includes timely and reasonable access to the non-Federal entity's personnel for the purpose of interview and discussion related to such documents.
( b ) Only under extraordinary and rare circumstances would such access include review of the true name of victims of a crime. Routine monitoring cannot be considered extraordinary and rare circumstances that would necessitate access to this information. When access to the true name of victims of a crime is necessary, appropriate steps to protect this sensitive information must be taken by both the non-Federal entity and the HHS awarding agency. Any such access, other than under a court order or subpoena pursuant to a bona fide confidential investigation, must be approved by the head of the HHS awarding agency or delegate.
( c ) *Expiration of right of access.* The rights of access in this section are not limited to the required retention period but last as long as the records are retained. HHS awarding agencies and pass-through entities must not impose any other access requirements upon non-Federal entities.
EX-10.2





 Exhibit 10.2 

AMENDMENT NO. 3 
 TO

 THE J. M. SMUCKER COMPANY DEFINED CONTRIBUTION SUPPLEMENTAL 

EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN 

(Amended and Restated Effective May 1, 2015) 

The J. M. Smucker Company hereby adopts this Amendment No. 3 to The J. M. Smucker Company Defined Contribution Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan (Amended and Restated Effective May 1, 2015) (the “Plan”). Words and phrases used herein with initial capital letters which are defined in the Plan are used herein as so defined. The provision of this Amendment
No. 3 shall be effective as of the date of execution set forth below. 
 Section 1 

Section 4.8 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

 

	 	“4.8	 [Reserved]” 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 3 to the Plan to be executed this 17th day of June, 2020. 
  

			
	THE J. M. SMUCKER COMPANY
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jill R. Penrose

	Name:	 	Jill R. Penrose
	Title:	 	Chief People and Administrative Officer



  
 1
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Artificial Life, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eberhard
Schoeneburg, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


                            /s/ Eberhard Schoeneburg

                              Eberhard Schoeneburg
                           Chief Executive Officer and
                           Principal Financial Officer
August 16, 2004
[No. 3851.]

#### Hall, Receiver, v. McIntosh.

Judgment affirmed on the authority of *Hall v. Burrell,*ante.

*Error to Otero District Court.*Hon. J. E. Rizer, Judge.

Mr. Feed A. Sabin, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. John H. Yooehees, for defendant in error.

Presiding Judge Scott

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case involves the same question as in the case of *G. M. Hall, Receiver of the State Bank of Rocky Ford, v. Burrell,*decided at this term of court, and upon the authority of that case the judgment is • affirmed.

All the judges concurring.
#### § 2502.80 What may the General Counsel do upon receipt of the process and pleadings and report of circumstances?

Where appropriate, the General Counsel may request that the Department of Justice provide legal representation for the AmeriCorps employee.
Exhibit 32.1



Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George G. Andrews, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 16, 2004



/s/ George G. AndrewsGeorge G. Andrews, Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.1335 Pressure and vacuum protection. ( a ) Each cargo tank must have the following: ( 1 ) A pressure gauge that: ( i ) Monitors the vapor space;
( ii ) Is readable at the tank; and
( iii ) Has remote readouts at the cargo control station.
( 2 ) If vacuum protection is required under § 154.804, a vacuum gauge meeting paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (a)(1)(ii), and (a)(1)(iii) of this section.
( b ) The vessel must have at least one high pressure alarm that: ( 1 ) Actuates before the pressure in any cargo tank exceeds the maximum pressure specially approved by the Commandant (CG-OES); and
( 2 ) Actuates an audible and visual alarm at the cargo control station, and a remote group alarm in the wheelhouse.
( c ) If vacuum protection is required under § 154.804, the vessel must have at least one low pressure alarm that: ( 1 ) Actuates before the pressure in any cargo tank falls below the minimum pressure specially approved by the Commandant (CG-522); and
( 2 ) Actuates an audible and visual alarm at the cargo control station, and a remote group alarm in the wheelhouse.
( d ) At least one pressure gauge must be fitted on each: ( 1 ) Enclosed hold;
( 2 ) Enclosed interbarrier space;
( 3 ) Cargo pump discharge line;
( 4 ) Liquid cargo manifold; and
( 5 ) Vapor cargo manifold.
( e ) There must be a local manifold pressure gauge between each manifold stop valve and each hose connection to the shore.
[CGD 74-289, 44 FR 26009, May 3, 1979, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4782, Feb. 3, 1983]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cr-20513

Hon. Matthew F. Leitman

vs.

SEAN AUSTIN PERRY,

Defendant.

__________________________________________________________________/

ORDER FOR WITHDRAWAL AS ATTORNEY

NOW COMES Attorney BARRY A RESNICK and requests that this

Honorable Court remove him from the case caption, as Attorney for Defendant, as

the Defendant, SEAN PERRY, is represented by Attorney Lawrence Nathaniel

Radden whose’s Appearance was filed on October 19, 2017 (ECF No. 20).

/s/Matthew F. Leitman

MATTHEW F. LEITMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: January 11, 2019

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties

and/or counsel of record on January 11, 2019, by electronic means and/or ordinary

mail.

s/Holly A. Monda

Case Manager

(810) 341-9764
|EXHIBIT 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Belcrest Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                       
|   



|Date: August 9, 2005
|--------------------



| | /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.Thomas E. Faust Jr.Chief Executive Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 99

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 99 appear at 63 FR 39998, July 24, 1998.

#### § 99.12 Time of hearing.

The hearing shall be scheduled not less than 30 days nor more than 90 days after the date of the notice of the hearing furnished to the applicant or Lead Agency, unless otherwise agreed to, in writing, by the parties.