alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.233 Separation of tanks from machinery, service and other spaces. ( a ) To prevent leakage through a single weld failure, the following spaces must be separated from a cargo by two walls, two bulkheads, or a bulkhead and a deck not meeting in a cruciform joint: ( 1 ) Machinery spaces.
( 2 ) Service spaces.
( 3 ) Accommodation spaces.
( 4 ) Spaces for storing potable domestic, or feed water.
( 5 ) Spaces for storing edibles.
( b ) Some examples of arrangements that may separate cargo from the spaces listed in paragraph (a) of this section are the following: ( 1 ) Dedicated ballast tanks.
( 2 ) Cargo pumprooms.
( 3 ) Ballast pumprooms.
( 4 ) Tanks not carrying a cargo listed in this part.[3]
( 5 ) A cofferdam aft of the cargo containment systems and whose forward bulkhead is forward of any joint common to an accommodations space and the deck.
( 6 ) Double walled piping or a piping tunnel.
Footnotes -
153.233
[3] See also §§ 32.56-5 and 32.60-10 of this chapter for limitations on the stowage of combustible liquids adjacent to ignition sources.
##### 



Exhibit No. 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of barnesandnoble.com
inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Marie J. Toulantis, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:



| |     |                                                                                                                                                             
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.



| |     |                        
| | --- | -----------------------
| | By: | /s/  MARIE J. TOULANTIS

| |                              
| | -----------------------------
| |                              
| | Marie J. Toulantis           
| | Chief Executive Officer      
| | (Principal Executive Officer)
| | barnesandnoble.com inc.      
| | May 15, 2003                 

NOTE: A signed original of this certification has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 151.10-5 Subdivision and stability.

Each barge must meet the applicable requirements in subchapter S of this chapter.

[CGD 70-023, 48 FR 51009, Nov. 4, 1983]
AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Eastern District of Michigan

Cynthia Green,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 2:14−cv−14280−DPH−DRG

Hon. Denise Page Hood

Nationwide Arbitration Services, LLC,

et al.,

Defendant.

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: Cooper Financial, LLC

 A lawsuit has been filed against you.

 Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) - or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R.

Civ. P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) - you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney,

whose name and address are:

Amanda Marie Longendyke

24500 Northwestern Highway

Suite 206

Southfield, MI

48075

If you fail to respond, judgment by default may be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You

also must file your answer or motion with the court.

DAVID J. WEAVER, CLERK OF COURT By: s/ D. Worth 

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Date of Issuance: November 6, 2014

2:14-cv-14280-DPH-DRG Doc # 3 Filed 11/06/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 17
AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action

Summons and Complaint Return of Service

Case No. 2:14−cv−14280−DPH−DRG

Hon. Denise Page Hood

A copy of the Summons and Complaint has been served in the manner indicated below:

Name of Defendant Served: Cooper Financial, LLC

Date of Service:

Method of Service

Personally served at this address:

Left copies at defendant's usual place of abode with (name of person):

Other (specify):

Returned unexecuted (reason):

Service Fees: Travel $ Service $ Total $ 

Declaration of Server

I declare under the penalty of perjury that the information contained in this Return of Service is true and correct.

Name of Server:

Signature of Server:

Date:

Server's Address:

2:14-cv-14280-DPH-DRG Doc # 3 Filed 11/06/14 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MG DEARBORN, LLC, and

MG FARMINGTON HILLS, LLC,

Plaintiffs,

Case No: 14-13112

v. Hon. Victoria A. Roberts

WEST BEND MUTUAL INSURANCE,

Defendant.

 / 

ORDER SATISFYING SHOW CAUSE

On August 26, 2014, the Court ordered Defendant to show cause as to why

complete diversity exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (Doc. # 4). Specifically, the Court

ordered Defendant to correctly allege the citizenship of each Plaintiff. In its response to

the show cause order, Defendant said Allie T. Mallad is the sole member of each

Plaintiff and is a “resident of Dearborn, Michigan.” (Doc. # 5).

On September 3, 2014, the Court entered a second show cause order; it

explained that for diversity jurisdiction purposes, an allegation that an individual is a

“resident” of a state is not the same as an assertion that he is a “citizen” of that state. 

(Doc. # 6).

On September 4, 2014, Defendant submitted a satisfactory response to the

Court’s second show cause order. (Doc. # 7). For diversity jurisdiction purposes, each

Plaintiff is a citizen of Michigan, and Defendant is a citizen of Wisconsin; complete

diversity exists. 

2:14-cv-13112-VAR-PJK Doc # 8 Filed 09/08/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 173
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant has shown that complete diversity

exists under § 1332. 

Dated: September 8, 2014 S/Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

2:14-cv-13112-VAR-PJK Doc # 8 Filed 09/08/14 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 174
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                        CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-26517 and 333-46401 on Form S-3 and Nos. 333-14863, 333-61723 and 333-49091
on Form S-8 of Loral Space & Communications Ltd. (a Bermuda company) of our
reports with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Loral Space &
Communications Ltd., Space Systems/Loral, Inc. and Globalstar, L.P. and the
financial statement schedule of Loral Space & Communications Ltd., appearing in
or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Loral Space &
Communications Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 1998.
 
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
March 30, 1999
#### In the Matter of the Opening of Eleventh Avenue.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to each of tbe respondents. Opinion by

Brady, J.
AVTEL
                    Communications, Inc.


                                               December 13, 1996



Mr. Barry Peters
4162 Sterlingview Drive
Moorpark, CA  93021


     Re:     Amendment to Letter Agreement dated August 1, 1996 (the "Letter 
Agreement")


Dear Mr. Peters:

     Reference is made to the Letter Agreement and to that certain Assumption 
and Rights Agreement dated as of October 23, 1996, by and among AvTel 
Communications, Inc., a Utah corporation (formerly Hi, Tiger International, 
Inc.) (the "Company"), AvTel Holdings, Inc., a California corporation 
(formerly AvTel Communications, Inc.) ("AHI"), Anthony E. Papa ("Papa"), James 
P. Pisani ("Pisani") and you (the "Assumption Agreement").

     Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Assumption Agreement, the 
Company has assumed and agreed to perform all rights, obligations and duties 
of AHI under the Letter Agreement.  The rights under the Letter Agreement 
include the option of the Company or its assignees to purchase from you, at 
any time after the Effective Events (as defined in the Letter Agreement) to 
acquire from you all or any part of the 1,063,128 shares (the "Shares") of the 
Company's $.001 par value common stock ("Common Stock") that had been issued 
to you in connection with the merger of the Company with AHI.  

     Based on certain determinations of the Board of Directors of the Company 
(the "Board") and certain other considerations and factors, you and the 
Company have agreed to enter into this letter agreement to amend and reform 
the Letter Agreement.  Accordingly, in consideration of the mutual covenants, 
agreements and promises contained herein, you and the Company agree as 
follows:

1.The right and option of the Company to purchase the Shares has been 
partially assigned, transferred and set over to Anthony E. Papa and James P. 
Pisani, each as to 431,564 shares.



130 Cremona Drive, Goleta, California, 93117 - Phone (805) 685-0355 - Fax 
(805) 685-9685.
The Company retains the right, subject to the terms and conditions of a 
separate agreement entered into between you and the Company of even date 
herewith, to purchase 200,000 of the Shares.

3.The option exercise price is $0.00094062 per share.

4.Except as expressly set forth herein and as otherwise set forth in the 
separate agreement referenced in paragraph 2 above, all other terms and 
conditions of the Letter Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

     If you agree to the terms and conditions of this amendment to the Letter 
Agreement, please sign in the space provided below and return a copy of this 
to the Company.

                         Very truly yours,

                         AvTel Communications, Inc.



                         Anthony E. Papa
                         President & Chief Executive Officer

Acknowledged and accepted this _____ day
of December, 1996.


_____________________________________
Barry A. Peters
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Achillion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Mary Kay Fenton, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                                  
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Dated: October 27, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Mary Kay Fenton                              
|                        |  |  |  | Mary Kay Fenton                                  
|                        |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Achillion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael D. Kishbauch, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: May 7, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael D. Kishbauch             
|                   |  |  |  | Michael D. Kishbauch                 
|                   |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JACK MANN,

Plaintiff, No. 14-13439

v. District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow

Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER

On January 27, 2016, I filed a Report and Recommendation recommending that the

Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed based on his failure to exhaust administrative remedies,

as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). In fact, Plaintiff did not even initiate his

administrative remedy process within the Bureau of Prisons until a month after he filed

his complaint. Under the PLRA, “a prison inmate may not complete the grievance process

after filing suit.” Boulding v. Michigan Dep't of Corr., 2015 WL 136195, at *3 (E.D.

Mich. 2015), citing Larkins v. Wilkinson, 1998 WL 898870 at *2 (6th Cir. Dec.17, 1998)

(unpublished).

Plaintiff has filed a motion to amend his complaint [Doc. #48], as well as an

amended complaint [Doc. #66]. The Defendant has filed a motion to strike the amended

complaint [Doc. #67]. Notwithstanding any additional factual allegations Plaintiff may

now make, the fact is that he did not exhaust his administrative remedies before

commencing this action, and the action must therefore be dismissed. Porter v. Nussle, 534

U.S. 516, 122 S.Ct. 983, 984, 152 L.Ed.2d 12(2002). Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion to

amend must be DENIED as futile, and Defendant’s motion to strike the amended

-1-

2:14-cv-13439-AJT-RSW Doc # 71 Filed 01/27/16 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 918
complaint (which was filed without first obtaining leave of the Court) must be

GRANTED.

Plaintiff has also filed the following non-dispositive motions:

-Motion for Discovery Conference and Sanctions [Doc. #24]

-Motion to Admit or Deny [Doc. #38]

-Motion for Expedited Discovery [Doc. #41]

-Motion for Order re: Discovery [Doc. #49]

Because Plaintiff’s complaint must be dismissed for non-exhaustion, these motions

must be DENIED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to amend complaint [Doc.

#48] be DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to strike the amended

complaint [Doc. #67] be GRANTED, and that Plaintiff’s amended complaint [Doc. #66]

be STRICKEN.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motions for Discovery Conference

and Sanctions [Doc. #24]; to Admit or Deny [Doc. #38]; for Expedited Discovery [Doc.

#41]; and for Order re: Discovery [Doc. #49] are all DENIED.

s/R. Steven Whalen 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Date: January 27, 2016

-2-

2:14-cv-13439-AJT-RSW Doc # 71 Filed 01/27/16 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 919
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on

January 27, 2016, electronically and/or by U.S. mail.

s/C. Ciesla 

Case Manager 

-3-

2:14-cv-13439-AJT-RSW Doc # 71 Filed 01/27/16 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 920
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 

U.S. Department of Commerce 

NOAA’s Oil Spill Response 

Surface Washing Agents 

Surface washing agents are liquid products designed to

make it easier to remove oil from surfaces and 

structures that have been oiled so that they don’t become 

“secondary sources” of pollution. 

Thirty-three surface washing agents are currently 

listed on the National Contingency Plan Product 

Schedule, an EPA list of products that have met basic 

requirements for being considered for use in an oil spill 

response. Approval from the Regional Response Team is 

needed before a surface washing agent can be used in a 

manner that would cause it to be released to 

the environment. 

When Surface Washing Agents are Used 

Surface washing agents are used to soften and lift oil 

off of surfaces or structures that have been oiled, such as 

beach rocks, rock platforms, artificial structures, and 

riprap. Typically, conventional cleanup methods are used 

first to the extent of their utility (e.g., removal of 

gross oiling). 

Surface washing agents 

also are used to clean and 

decontaminate response 

equipment and, less often, 

vessels that have been oiled. 

For example, in 2001, the M/V

Genmar Hector (left) was 

cleaned with surface washing 

agents after its hull and superstructure were oiled. 

Surface washing agents typically act relatively 

quickly and can be used on all types of oil. The application methods vary but the agents are typically sprayed on 

the oiled surface, allowed to soak 

5 to 15 minutes, followed by a warm 

water/high pressure wash. 

How They Work 

Surface washing agents contain surfactants, solvents, 

and/or other additives that soften and lift oil off the 

surface. There are two main types. “Lift and float” 

products lift oil from the surface so it floats on the water 

as a slick and can be recovered. Booms, sorbents, and 

vacuum pumps are often used with these products to 

collect and recover the oil. “Lift and disperse” products 

act like detergents to lift oil off surfaces, emulsify it 

(break it into fine droplets), and disperse it into the water. 

Because it’s not possible to recover the oil directly 

when using this type of product, responders must contain 

and recover the washwater. 

Example Surface Washing Agents 

Corexit 9580 and PES-51are both “lift and float” 

surface washing agents. PES-51 is composed mainly of 

surfactants and d-limonene, a chemical with a lemon-like 

odor produced naturally by citrus plants and some 

coniferous trees. PES-51 has been used or tested at many 

oil spills. A good summary of surface washing agents can

be found at 

http://www.nrt.org/Production/NRT/RRTHome.nsf/re

sources/RRT%20IV%20Meeting%20Summaries/$file/Su

rfaceWashingAgents.pdf. 

Learn more about NOAA’s response to the BP oil spill 

at http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/deepwaterhorizon. 

To learn more about NOAA, visit http://www.noaa.gov.

­

June 7, 2010
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
 
                       LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS LTD.
 
          COMPUTATION OF DEFICIENCY OF EARNINGS TO COVER FIXED CHARGES
 
                  AND RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COVER FIXED CHARGES
                         (in thousands, except ratios)
                                  (Unaudited)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               YEARS ENDED         NINE MONTHS
                                                               DECEMBER 31,           ENDED
                                                           --------------------    DECEMBER 31,
                                                             1998        1997          1996
                                                           --------    --------    ------------
<S>                                                        <C>         <C>         <C>
Earnings:
  Income (loss) before income taxes, equity in net loss
     of affiliates and minority interest.................  $(25,628)   $126,982      $16,498
  Plus fixed charges:
     Interest expense....................................   111,334      37,871        6,000
     Interest component of rent expense(1)...............     6,600       4,400
  Less capitalized interest..............................    60,125      22,641
                                                           --------    --------      -------
Earnings available to cover fixed charges................  $ 32,181    $146,612      $22,498
                                                           ========    ========      =======
Fixed charges(2).........................................  $172,619    $ 78,568      $ 6,000
                                                           ========    ========      =======
Deficiency of earnings to cover fixed charges............  $140,438
                                                           ========
Ratio of earnings to cover fixed charges.................                   1.9x         3.7x
                                                                       ========      =======
</TABLE>
 
---------------
(1) The interest component of rent expense is deemed to be approximately 25% of
    total rent expense.
 
(2) Fixed charges include preferred dividends as adjusted for the Company's
    effective tax rate.
- 2391
- 2392
- 2393