alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BERTHA SHAMBERGER, PLAINTIFF, v. MARY NISKY AND ALBERT VAN BLARCOM, DEFENDANTS.

Decided November 9, 1929.

Before G-ummeke, Chief Justice, and Justices Kalisch and Campbell.

*1012For the rule, *Ward & McGinnis (Peter J. McGinnis,*of counsel).

For the defendant Mary Nisky, *Abraham I. Feltman.*

For the defendant A. Yan Blarcom, *Joseph Goult.*

Pee Cubiam.

The plaintiff was injured in a.collision between the defendant Yan Blarcom’s automobile, and operated by him, at the' time of the collision, and an automobile of the defendant Mary Nisky, in whose car the plaintiff was a passenger, at the invitation of the former, and who was opreating her ear.

There was a verdict for the defendants. It is difficult to comprehend upon what reasonable theory the jury found a verdict for the defendants. It is certainly clear, that if both had exercised reasonable care the accident would not have happened. According to the testimony, the jury could have found both defendants guilty of negligence. It may very well be, that neither could have recovered any damages against each other, because of their joint negligence, but as the plaintiff was not chargeable with negligence, contributing to her injury, she being a passenger in the car, she was entitled to a recovery, if the jury believed the testimony against both defendants.

The rule to show cause is made absolute.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1713 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 200
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1713

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 17, 2009

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                            November 4, 2009

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To name the South Central Agricultural Research Laboratory of the 
 Department of Agriculture in Lane, Oklahoma, and the facility of the 
   United States Postal Service located at 310 North Perry Street in 
  Bennington, Oklahoma, in honor of former Congressman Wesley ``Wes'' 
                                Watkins.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF SOUTH CENTRAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH 
              LABORATORY, LANE, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) Redesignation.--The South Central Agricultural Research 
Laboratory of the Department of Agriculture in Lane, Oklahoma, shall be 
known and redesignated as the ``Wes Watkins Agricultural Research 
Laboratory''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the South Central 
Agricultural Research Laboratory shall be deemed to be a reference to 
the ``Wes Watkins Agricultural Research Laboratory''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF WES WATKINS POST OFFICE, BENNINGTON, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 310 North Perry Street in Bennington, Oklahoma, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Wes Watkins Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Wes 
Watkins Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 200

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1713

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To name the South Central Agricultural Research Laboratory of the 
 Department of Agriculture in Lane, Oklahoma, and the facility of the 
   United States Postal Service located at 310 North Perry Street in 
  Bennington, Oklahoma, in honor of former Congressman Wesley ``Wes'' 
                                Watkins.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 4, 2009

                       Reported without amendment
```
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1974 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 

depreciation classification of motorsports entertainment complexes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2009 

Mr. THOMPSON of California (for himself, Mr. HELLER, Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. 

DAVIS of Alabama, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. MEEK of Florida, Mr. 

BACHUS, Mrs. BONO MACK, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. BRALEY of Iowa, Mr. 

BURTON of Indiana, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. COURTNEY, Ms. FOXX, 

Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mrs. HALVORSON, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, Mr. HILL, Ms. KOSMAS, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mr. MCHENRY, Mr. 

MCHUGH, Mr. MICA, Mr. MOORE of Kansas, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. 

PERRIELLO, Mr. SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. WESTMORELAND, 

and Mr. CROWLEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the depreciation classification of motorsports 

entertainment complexes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Motorsports Fairness 

5 and Permanency Act of 2009’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 1974 IH

1 SEC. 2. 7-YEAR CLASS LIFE FOR MOTORSPORTS ENTER2 TAINMENT COMPLEX FACILITIES MADE PER3 MANENT. 

4 Section 168(i)(15) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

5 1986 (defining motorsports entertainment complex) is 

6 amended by striking subparagraph (D). 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,492
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,985
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     16,763
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         40,876
<ALLOWANCE>                                        611
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,903
<DEPOSITS>                                      56,813
<SHORT-TERM>                                       183
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                459
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,193
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,255
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  63,903
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,057
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  431
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    30
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,518
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 860
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 866
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,652
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      127
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (1)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,579
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    632
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         632
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       493
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .83
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.89
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                        50
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   508
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       87
<RECOVERIES>                                        63
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  611
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               611
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            611


</TABLE>
Mr, Pendergrass, I am responding to the e

- mail below from Graham Long and I would like to clarify our request. The parts Boeing is asking to sell, will be new production parts, and not surplus from the DOD inventory. We understand that the sale of surplus parts is allowed under the current rule. As to our intensions should the FAA grant a temporary exemption, given a demand for the parts, Boeing w ould pursue obtaining a production approval to allow the sale of parts once the exemption expires. Please feel free to contact me should you have any further questions or requests. **Steven Dooley** Rotorcraft Certification Engineer Vertical Lift Division Boeing Military Aircraft (610) 591

- 2019 Steven.P.Dooley@boeing.com

**From:** Graham.Long@faa.gov [ mailto:Graham.Long@faa .gov] **Sent:** Friday, February 05, 2016 9:55 AM **To:** Dooley, Steven P **Cc:** Pong.K.Lee@faa.gov ; daniel.j.elgas@faa.gov **Subject:** FW: Boeing Cargo helicopter Sustainment Faa
- 2016
- 0833 Steve: FAA Rulemaking is working on your petition. Apparently they are unclear on Boeing’s intentions and need some clarification, especially relating to producing new parts for sale vs. sale of military surplus parts. Can you send something t o Mr. Pendergrass that would help clarify this? Perhaps a more

- direct statement of your intentions? I think this is contained in the middle of your summary paragraph, but for someone reading this without the background information, they can be confused w hen the discussion switches from surplus parts to newly manufactured parts. Mr. Pendergrass will be preparing the Federal Register Notice for the exemption. His contact information is below. Best regards, Graham Graham Long AIR

- 111 Restricted Category Certification Aircraft Certification Service Federal Aviation Administration 202

-267

- 1624
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case Number: 14-cr-20717 

 v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington 

KIMBERLY MISKY, 

 Defendant. 

_______________________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING 

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA 

AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT 

On April 8, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris conducted a plea 

hearing pursuant to Defendant’s consent. The Magistrate Judge issued her report on April 9, 

2015, recommending that this Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty. 

Although the Magistrate Judge’s report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may 

object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, 

neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the 

Magistrate Judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. 

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and 

recommendation waives any further right to appeal. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, 

ECF No. 19, is ADOPTED. 

 It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s plea of guilty is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 

Plea Agreement, ECF No. 18, is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT. 

Dated: April 28, 2015 s/Thomas L. Ludington 

 THOMAS L. LUDINGTON 

 United States District Judge 

1:14-cr-20717-TLL-PTM Doc # 22 Filed 04/28/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 102
PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served 

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first 

class U.S. mail on April 28, 2015. 

 s/Karri Sandusky 

 Karri Sandusky, Acting Case Manager 

1:14-cr-20717-TLL-PTM Doc # 22 Filed 04/28/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 103
§ 143.590 Propulsor redundancy on vessels that move tank barges carrying oil or hazardous material in bulk. ( a ) A towing vessel must be provided with at least two independent propulsors unless the requirements of § 143.595 are met.
( b ) There must be independent controls for each propulsor at each operating station.
( c ) In the event of a failure of a single propulsor, the remaining propulsor(s) must have sufficient power to maneuver the vessel to a safe location.
§ 263.12 How will we determine if a State intentionally misused Federal TANF funds? ( a ) The State must show, to our satisfaction, that it used these funds for purposes that a reasonable person would consider to be within the purposes of the TANF program (as specified at § 260.20 of this chapter) and consistent with the provisions listed in § 263.11.
( b ) We may determine that a State misused funds intentionally if there is supporting documentation, such as Federal guidance or policy instructions, precluding the use of Federal TANF funds for such purpose.
( c ) We may also determine that a State intentionally misused funds if the State continues to use the funds in the same or similarly improper manner after receiving notification that we had determined such use to be improper.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of First Federal Bancshares of Arkansas, Inc. (the “Registrant”)on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

a)     The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

b)    The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Registrant as of and for the period covered bythe Report.

 

 
|                    | /s/Sherri R.  Billings   | ** ** |
|-------------------------|--------------------------|------------|
|                    | Sherri R.  Billings      |
|                    | Chief  Financial Officer |
|                    |                     |
| Date: February 28, 2006 |                     |

 

----
# C_2011252EN.01001901.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/19

---

Appeal brought on 9 June 2011 by the European Commission against the judgment delivered on 29 March 2011 by the General Court (Third Chamber) in Case T-33/09 Portuguese Republic v European Commission

(Case C-292/11 P)

2011/C 252/34

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by P. Hetsch, P. Costa de Oliveira and M. Heller)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Portuguese Republic

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2011 in Case T-33/09 Portuguese Republic v Commission; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment of the General Court of 29 March 2011 in Case T-33/09 Portuguese Republic v Commission;

Portuguese Republic

Commission

| — | rule on the matters that are the subject of this appeal and were the subject of the action before the General Court, and dismiss the Portuguese Republic’s claim for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 25 November 2008 demanding payment of the penalty payment; |
| --- | --- |

—

rule on the matters that are the subject of this appeal and were the subject of the action before the General Court, and dismiss the Portuguese Republic’s claim for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 25 November 2008 demanding payment of the penalty payment;

| — | order the Portuguese Republic to bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the Commission both at first instance and in this appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Portuguese Republic to bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the Commission both at first instance and in this appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The General Court erred in law by: (i) misappraising both the powers of the Commission with regard to compliance with judgments of the Court of Justice made pursuant to Article 260(2) TFEU and its own jurisdiction to review the Commission’s actions; (ii) by ruling in the contested judgment, on the basis of an incomplete reading of the operative part of the judgment of the Court of Justice of 2004, that there had been failure to fulfil obligations, thereby infringing Article 260(2) TFEU. Furthermore, on any view the General Court’s judgment is marred by an error of law, for the General Court was in breach of its duty to state reasons, in that it decided on the basis of insufficient, contradictory reasoning that the Commission had overstepped the bounds of the infringement as found by the Court of Justice.

---
# Education and Sharing Day, U.S.A., 2007

A future of hope and opportunity in America requires that all our children develop the knowledge and character they need in life. On Education and Sharing Day, we recognize our responsibility to ensure that our young people have the foundation necessary to lead lives rich in purpose and fulfillment. 

Education and Sharing Day honors the legacy of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson and emphasizes our commitment to teach the next generation of Americans the values that make our country strong. The Lubavitcher Rebbe believed that society should “make a new commitment to kindness,” and he helped to establish education and outreach centers offering social service programs and humanitarian aid around the world. 

The character of our young people is strengthened by serving a cause greater than self and by the anchor of virtues, including courage and compassion. By instilling a spirit of service in our children, we create a more optimistic future for them and our Nation. 

                        NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim March 30, 2007, as Education and Sharing Day, U.S.A. I call upon government officials, educators, volunteers, and all the people of the United States to reach out to young people and work to create a better, brighter, and more hopeful future for all.                               ( print page 15008)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-sixth day of March, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 07-1587

Billing code 3195-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 2019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-185]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting; Agenda

Time and Date: 9:30 a.m., Tuesday, January 23, 2007.

Place: NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20594.

Status: The one item is open to the public.

Matter to be Considered:
    7713A Aircraft Accident Report--Crash During Approach to Landing, 
Circuit City Stores, Inc., Cessna Citation 560, N500AT, Pueblo, 
Colorado, February 16, 2005 (DCA05MA037)

News Media Contact: Lauren Peduzzi, Telephone: (202) 314-6100.
    Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Chris 
Bisett at (202) 314-6305 by Friday, January 19, 2007.
    The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by 
accessing a link under ``News & Events'' on the NTSB home page at 
http://www.ntsb.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

    Dated: January 12, 2007.
Vicky D'Onofrio,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-185 Filed 1-12-07; 2:04 pm]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Artificial Life, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eberhard Schoneburg, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Eberhard Schoneburg



Eberhard Schoneburg

Chief Executive Officer and

Principal Financial Officer

October 31, 2008





20



---
P. 1


# RCRA Box 321 Prepped by Ryan Dugan



### Document

Number: 

# 209)OGRC-S001 0 Docket Number: 

# F-93-OGRC-FFFF F

Printed 5/8/2007 3:36:31 PM

Sheet 209of 259P. 2 

### OG-RC-SOOIO AMA L OI L COMPANY , INC . 41 9 PERRY-BROOK S BUILDIN G AUSTIN . TEXA S 7870 1 GILBER TPRUO'HOMM E (812 ) 470-086 4 PRESIDEN T E . G . PRUO'HOMME . SR . VICE-PRESIDEN T
Septembe r 19 , 199 0

U . S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y 40 0 MStree t Washington , D.C . 2046 0 Attention : Rober t Hal l Dea r Sir : I a mth e presiden t o f Ama l Oi l Company , Inc . W e hav e a R 2 permi t t o operat e a reclaiming plan t i n sout han d southeas t Texas . I hav e learne d tha t th e EPAi s i n proces s o f classifyin g produce d crud e oi l tank bottom s a s a hazardou s material . I objec t t o classifying produce d crud e oi l bottom s an d residu e a s a hazardou s material . I hav e worke d aroundthi s materia l fo r thirt yyear s wit hn o advers e affect . I had a pumpe r wh o worke dfo r Mobi l Oi l an

d later , afte r retirement , wit hm e an d wa s activel y working a t ag e eighty-si xa t m yplan t i n sout hTexas . H e had worke daroundtank bottom s al l o f hi s life . W e hav e no t bee nsupplie d wit han yscientifi c o r technica l evidenc e pointing t o th e fac t tha t ordinaryproduce d crud e oi l i s a hazardou s wast e no r i s i t a hazardou s wast e merel ybecaus e i t i s a residu e i na tank bottom . I woul dappreciat e you r makin g a not e o f m ythought s o n thi s matter . I wil l b e gla dt o appea r an d testif yi f thi s woul d b e helpfu l o r appropriate . I thank yo u fo r you r cour t

GP:sa h 

# #^V^<£ ^