alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 10.11**
**Summary of Revised Director Compensation Structure for Non-Employee Directors**
     On October 19, 2004, the Board of Directors (“Board”) of Matrixx Initiatives, Inc.,based upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved a revised compensationstructure for non-employee directors. The new compensation structure is effective July 1, 2004,which is the date the Compensation Committee originally recommended the changes to the Board forits consideration.
     Under the new structure, the Chairman of the Board will receive a quarterly retainer of $7,500and all other non-employee directors will receive a quarterly retainer of $5,000. All non-employeedirectors will receive an annual grant of 3,500 shares of restricted common stock and 10,000options. The restrictions on the stock lapse three years from the date of grant and the optionsvest one-half immediately and one-half after one year. Non-employee directors will also receive aquarterly fee of $1,000 for each committee assignment (the “Committee Fee”). In addition,the Chairman of the Audit Committee will receive a quarterly fee of $2,000, and the Chairmen of theCorporate Governance and Nominating and Compensation Committees will each receive a quarterly feeof $1,250. Directors are also reimbursed for travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred bythem that are incidental to Board and committee meeting attendance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                    9
<LEGEND>
      This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000 of Cohoes Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiary and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          11,868
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             102
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     41,225
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          56,096
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            54,591
<LOANS>                                        582,203
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,761
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 704,414
<DEPOSITS>                                     491,508
<SHORT-TERM>                                    31,280
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,449
<LONG-TERM>                                     48,372
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            95
<OTHER-SE>                                     121,041
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 704,414
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 31,931
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,528
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   169
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                36,628
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              12,916
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,443
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           20,185
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,250
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  (8)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 13,504
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,907
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,390
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,390
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .53
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.06
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,611
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   772
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     72
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,025
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      580
<RECOVERIES>                                        66
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,761
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,925
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            836



</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 153

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 153.281 Piping to independent tanks.

Piping for an independent cargo tank must penetrate the tank only through that part of the tank or dome extending above the weatherdeck.

[CGD 78-128, 47 FR 21208, May 17, 1982]
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 09-1102 

________________________________________________________________________ 

PEACE CORPS 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and SIERRA LEONE 

Signed at Freetown November 2, 2009 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 SIERRA LEONE 

 Peace Corps 

Agreement signed at Freetown November 2, 2009; 

 Entered into force November 2, 2009.
[No. 3418.]

#### Empire Ranch and Cattle Co. v. Little et al.

Judgment affirmed on the authority of the opinion in No. 3417 ante.

*Appeal from Yuma*District• *Court.*Hon. II. P. Burke, Judge.

Mr. August Muntzing, Mr. Egbert More, for appellant.

Mr. John F. Mail, for appellee.

*Per curiam.*

Judgment affirmed on the authority of *The Empire Ranch and Cattle Company v. Herrick et al.,*No. 3417.

*Affirmed.*
# u.s. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

# REcEIVED OFFICE OF HEARINGS FEDERAL AVIATIONADMINISTRATION 

## SEP 29 2014 

## HEARING DOCKET
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, Complainant,
vs. DGW, Inc., d/b/a Melrose T Top, Intl. Respondent. DocketNo. FAA-2014-0546 FAA Case No. 2013S0700205
Judge Goodwin
RESPONSE TOMOTION TO CHANGE HEARING LOCATION 

### On August 19, 2014, the FAA filed its Complaint in this matter. Along with that Complaint, the FAA requested that the hearing location be set in the Louisville, Kentucky area. On September 4, 2014, the Judge issued a Procedural Order that, .among other things, set the hearing location in Louisville, Kentucky. On September 16, 2014, the Respondent moved that the Judge change the hearing location to Chicago, Illinois. The FAA nowresponds in support of the original hearing location. As the basis for its motion, Respondent argnes that it and its attorney are located in the vicinity ofChicago, Illinois. 1 

### The Respondent argues that because Lhe undersigned is not located in Louisville, Kentucky, it will not prejudice the FAA to have the undersigned travel to Chicago instead of Louisville. Respondent's motion disregards the location of witnesses other than its
own employees. The hazardous material leak from Respondent's shipment was.detected by ·UPS employees at a UPS facility in Louisville, Kentucky. The Special Agent who responded to the

1 Respondent also notes thatthe FAA has offices in Chicago, Illinois, andthatthis wouldbe more convenient for Respondent, butit is unclear why thepresence ofFAA offices in Chicago wouldmake a hearing in Chicago more convenientfor Respondent.scene of1he leak was stationed in Louisville, Kentucky, as was the Special Agent who completed the investigation into the hazardous materials violations. The location of1hese witnesses was the basis for the FAA'srequest that the hearing locationbe set in Louisville, Kentucky. The presence ofthree or more witnesses in 1he Louisville, Kentucky, including at least
one 1hird-party witness, outweighs the presence ofthe single known witness in Chicago, Illinois (Chris Wiehle, Respondent's General Manager), and Respondent's attorney. The hearing location in this matter shouldremain set in Louisville, Kentucky. 

## '/". Respectfully submittedthiQ2:_ ay ofSeptember, 2014.

# CI!Rl~lC STE ENSON Attorney Office oftheRegional CounselCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifythat a copy ofthe foregoing FAA's Response to Motionto Change Hearing Locationhas been sentthis date bythe following methods: original and one copy via certifiedmail: FederalAviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Attention: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1000 Washington, D.C. 20591
one copy via certified mail and facsimile: Richard Williams, Esq. Griffin Williams LLP 501 W. State Street, Suite 203 Geneva, IL 60134 fax: (630) 262-0644 The Honorable Judge Richard C. Goodwin Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 fax: (202) 366-7536

DONNA STA LEY Legal Assistant Office ofthe Regional Counsel
Dated
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7391

JERRY LEE KEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, 

at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (2:17-cv-00556)

Submitted: February 15, 2018 Decided: February 20, 2018

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry Lee Key, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Lee Key appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of 

the magistrate judge and denying Key’s motion for a certificate of innocence pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 2513 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Key v. United States, 

No. 2:17-cv-00556 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 29, 2017). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2012032EN.01001301.xml

| 4.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/13

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 3 October 2011 — Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.V. v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-515/11)

2012/C 32/22

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.V.

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the second sentence of Article 2(2) of Directive 2003/4/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on public access to environmental information and repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC to be interpreted as meaning that bodies and institutions are acting in a legislative capacity when their activities relate to legislation by the executive on the basis of authorisation given by a law enacted by Parliament? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the second sentence of Article 2(2) of Directive 2003/4/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on public access to environmental information and repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC to be interpreted as meaning that bodies and institutions are acting in a legislative capacity when their activities relate to legislation by the executive on the basis of authorisation given by a law enacted by Parliament?

1

| 2. | If question 1 is to be answered in the affirmative, are such bodies and institutions permanently excluded from the term ‘public authority’, or only until completion of the legislative process? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If question 1 is to be answered in the affirmative, are such bodies and institutions permanently excluded from the term ‘public authority’, or only until completion of the legislative process?

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 41, p. 26.

1

---
Case 2:14-cv-14808-AC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 12/17/14 PageID.1 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:14-cv-14808-AC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 12/17/14 PageID.2 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:14-cv-14808-AC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 12/17/14 PageID.3 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:14-cv-14808-AC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 12/17/14 PageID.4 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:14-cv-14808-AC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 12/17/14 PageID.5 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:14-cv-14808-AC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 12/17/14 PageID.6 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:14-cv-14808-AC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 12/17/14 PageID.7 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:14-cv-14808-AC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 12/17/14 PageID.8 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:14-cv-14808-AC-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 12/17/14 PageID.9 Page 9 of 9
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          40,986
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,907
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,641
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,774
<OTHER-SE>                                    (20,508)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,907
<SALES>                                        254,199
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               261,489
<CGS>                                          129,773
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,773
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               816,422
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (691,996)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (691,996)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (599,706)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)


</TABLE>
# --------------.........
SERVED: AUGUST 22, 2012

...• , •.. I J**~r** ji lUt_
. ·. ;: i:Jli,**t:1'T~Jlrci.\IT** 

### ('JF 

## ': ',;,**t·I"Dl'~'R.TA.f'QI\1** :; ,, hit0t )i**~ l"l~**  

### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION :

### ·,·,:r- 1 '·

## np~cqA·!·~OP-jl:' I •..'I .,,, '· Ll I I I i j
. 1.) 

### OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF SKYWEST AIRLINES FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0872
NOTICE OFASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

### This proceeding

## (heretof~re designated as Case No. 2011NM060047) has been assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service List

# ........ 

# -------------

SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 1 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

.

Todd C. Emerson, 

### Respondent's Counsel Director- Government and Legal Affairs SkyWest Airlines 444 South River Road St. George, UT 84790 TEL: 435-634-3530 FAX: 435-634-3505 ONE COPY

Jeffrey M. Harper, 

### Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel Northwest MountainRegion, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, W A 98057 TEL: 425-227-2161 FAX: 425-227-1007 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,

### Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2012-0872 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use thefollowing address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., WilburWright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

EARL D. WILSON, 

 

 Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 14-14525 

 Honorable John Corbett O’Meara 

 Magistrate Judge David R. Grand 

v. 

 

BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION TO COMPEL AND TO STRIKE INITIAL DISCLOSURES [13]

Before the Court is Plaintiff Earl Wilson’s Motion to Compel Discovery Requests Sent 

From Defendant Bayview and Strike Their Initial Disclosures (Doc. #13), which was referred to 

this Court for hearing and determination pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(A) (Doc. #14). On 

April 23, 2015, this Court held an informal telephonic conference with the parties’ counsel, 

during which it was agreed as follows: 

 On or before May 1, 2015, Defendant will provide Plaintiff with supplemental 

responses to Plaintiff’s Interrogatory Nos. 1, 3, 4, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16. 

 On or before May 1, 2015, Defendant will supplement its Rule 26(a)(1) Initial 

Disclosures to indicate that Marilyn Coro was formerly employed by Defendant. 

Defendant will also, by this same date, undertake a good faith effort to determine 

and provide to Plaintiff’s counsel Ms. Coro’s last known address and telephone 

number. 

As discussed on the telephone call, the Court will not award monetary sanctions at this 

time, nor will it strike Defendant’s initial disclosures. The Court expects both sides to timely 

supplement discovery responses and respond to future discovery requests, and it will consider 

awarding sanctions in appropriate circumstances. 

For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. #13) 

5:14-cv-14525-JCO-DRG Doc # 15 Filed 04/23/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 107
2 

to the extent that Defendant must supplement certain interrogatory responses and its initial 

disclosures, as specified above, on or before May 1, 2015, and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s 

motion to the extent it requests monetary sanctions and seeks to strike Defendant’s initial 

disclosures. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 23, 2015 s/David R. Grand 

Ann Arbor, Michigan DAVID R. GRAND 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES REGARDING OBJECTIONS 

The parties’ attention is drawn to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), which provides a period of 

fourteen (14) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order within which to file objections 

for consideration by the district judge under 28 U.S. C. §636(b)(1). 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record 

and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to their respective email or First Class 

U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on April 23, 2015. 

 s/Eddrey O. Butts 

 EDDREY O. BUTTS 

 Case Manager

5:14-cv-14525-JCO-DRG Doc # 15 Filed 04/23/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 108
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with
this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report of Loral Space & Communications Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the
period ending December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, John Capogrossi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | /s/ John Capogrossi                     
| | ----------------------------------------
| | John Capogrossi                         
| | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
| | Treasurer and Controller                



April 10, 2014
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.1850 Entering cargo handling spaces. ( a ) The master shall ensure that the ventilation system under § 154.1200 is in operation for 30 minutes before a person enters one of the following: ( 1 ) Spaces containing cargo pumps, compressors, and compressor motors.
( 2 ) Gas-dangerous cargo control spaces.
( 3 ) Other spaces containing cargo handling equipment.
( b ) The master shall ensure that a warning sign listing the requirement for use of the ventilation system, is posted outside of each space under paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) The master shall ensure that no sources of ignition are put in a cargo handling space on a vessel carrying flammable cargo unless the space is gas free.