alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 72 (Monday, April 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 19061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1874]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Submission Deadline for International Arrival 
Authorizations at Chicago O'Hare International Airport for the Winter 
2007 Scheduling Season

AGENCY: Department of Transportation, FAA.

ACTION: Notice of submission deadline.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA announces May 3, 2007, as the deadline for submitting 
requests for the allocation of international Arrival Authorizations at 
Chicago O'Hare International Airport (ORD). The FAA deadline coincides 
with the submission deadline established by the International Air 
Transport Association (IATA) for the Winter 2007 Schedule Coordination 
Conference. The conference covers the period of October 28, 2007 
through March 29, 2008. The FAA limits scheduled arrivals at ORD from 7 
a.m. to 9 p.m., Central Time, Monday through Friday, and 12 p.m. to 9 
p.m., on Sunday, based on runway capacity.

DATES: Requests for international Arrival Authorizations must be 
submitted no later than May 3, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Requests may be submitted by mail to Slot Administration 
Office, AGC-200, Office of the Chief Counsel, 800 Independence Ave., 
SW., Washington, DC 20591; facsimile: 202-267-7277; ARINC: DCAYAXD; or 
by e-mail to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4a7d670b1d0b673926253e2b2e2723240a2c2b2b642d253c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="52657f1305137f213e3d2633363f3b3c123433337c353d24">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Komal Jain, Regulations Division, 
Office of the Chief Counsel, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone number: 202-
267-3073.

    Issued in Washington, DC on April 10, 2007.
Rebecca B. MacPherson,
Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.
[FR Doc. 07-1874 Filed 4-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.053-6 Procedure for approval. ( a ) *General.* Work vests for use on merchant vessels are approved only by the Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard. Manufacturers seeking approval of a work vest shall follow the procedures of this section and subpart 159.005 of this chapter.
( b ) If the work vest is of a standard design, as described by § 160.053-3, in order to be approved, the work vest must be tested in accordance with § 160.053-4 by an independent laboratory accepted by the Coast Guard under 46 CFR 159.010.
( c ) If the work vest is of a non-standard design, the application must include the following: ( 1 ) Plans and specifications containing the information required by § 159.005-12 of this chapter, including drawings, product description, construction specifications, and bill of materials.
( 2 ) The information specified in § 159.005-5(a)(2) (i) through (iii) of this chapter, except that, if preapproval review has been waived, the manufacturer is not required to send a prototype work vest sample to the Commandant.
( 3 ) Performance testing results of the design performed by an independent laboratory, that has a Memorandum of Understanding with the Coast Guard under § 159.010-7 of this subchapter covering the in-water testing of personal flotation devices, showing equivalence to the standard design's performance in all material respects.
( 4 ) Any special purpose(s) for which the work vest is designed and the vessel(s) or vessel type(s) on which its use is intended.
( 5 ) Buoyancy and other relevant tolerances to be complied with during production.
( 6 ) The text of any optional marking to be included on the work vest in addition to the markings required by § 160.053.
[CGD 95-028, 62 FR 51215, Sept. 30, 1997]
# C_2011252EN.01002501.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/25

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 28 June 2011 — K

(Case C-322/11)

2011/C 252/46

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Referring court

Korkein hallinto-oikeus

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: K

Appellant:

Other parties: Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö, Valtiovarainministeriö

Other parties:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Articles 63 TFEU and 65 TFEU be interpreted as precluding national legislation under which a person with general liability to tax in Finland cannot deduct a loss incurred on the transfer of immovable property situated in France from gains on the transfer of shares taxable in Finland, whereas a person with general liability to tax in Finland may on certain conditions deduct a loss on the transfer of equivalent immovable property situated in Finland from gains on transfer?

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Celerity Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Celerity.

Dated:   April 11, 2005               By: /s/ Robert B. Legnosky
                                          ----------------------
                                              Robert B. Legnosky
                                              President, Chief Executive Officer
                                              and Chairman of the Board
                                              Interim Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 153

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 153.905 Regulations required to be on board.

No person may operate a tankship unless the most recent editions of this part, and parts 35 and 150 of this chapter are on board.

[CGD 78-128, 47 FR 21210, May 17, 1982]
Presidential Documents

14033 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 56 

Friday, March 23, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8115 of March 21, 2007 

Greek Independence Day: A National Day of Celebration of 

Greek and American Democracy, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

The United States and Greece share a long friendship built on common 

values and an abiding love for freedom. On Greek Independence Day, we 

underscore the warm ties between our countries, recognize the Greek Americans who enrich our society, and commemorate the anniversary of modern 

Greece. 

The ancient Greeks entrusted their citizens with the right to govern, and 

they believed in the power of freedom to protect human dignity and basic 

human rights. Many of America’s Founding Fathers studied Greek history 

and took inspiration from these democratic ideals as they framed our Constitution. The founders of modern Greece had the strong support of our 

own young democracy when they declared their independence in 1821, 

and our nations have stood as allies in the major conflicts of the 20th 

century. Today, we continue to defend freedom together in the global war 

on terror, as Greek and American Armed Forces work to lay the foundation 

of peace for generations to come. 

On Greek Independence Day, and throughout the year, we celebrate the 

universality of freedom and the enduring bonds between Greece and the 

United States. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim March 25, 2007, as 

Greek Independence Day: A National Day of Celebration of Greek and American Democracy. I call upon all Americans to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies and activities. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
14034 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 56 / Friday, March 23, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-first 

day of March, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtyfirst. 

[FR Doc. 07–1477 

Filed 3–22–07; 11:25 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULESGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Bobby Yazdani, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Saba Software, Inc. (the
Company) hereby certify, as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: January 9, 2008



By:

/s/ BOBBY YAZDANIBobby YazdaniChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted), Philip A. Falcone, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of HC2 Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), and Michael J. Sena, the Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:


1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2016 , to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.


Dated: March 28, 2017


/s/ Philip A. Falcone/s/ Michael J. SenaPhilip A. FalconeMichael J. SenaChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TERESA HAYWARD,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 14-14613

v. HON. MARIANNE O. BATTANI 

COMMISSIONER 

OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

_________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND 

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Teresa Hayward brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g),

challenging the final decision of the Commissioner denying her application for benefits

under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. Plaintiff filed her claims on

December 5, 2011, alleging disability as of April 1, 2011. After Plaintiff’s claim was denied,

she requested a hearing. Administrative Law Judge Donald D’Amato (“ALJ”) presided over

the March 11, 2013 hearing. In a decision dated May 17, 2013, the ALJ denied benefits. 

On October 8, 2014, the Appeals Council denied Plaintiff’s request for review of the

ALJ’s decision. Plaintiff timely filed this action for judicial review of the Commissioner's

decision. The case was referred to Magistrate Judge David R. Grand pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. In his Report and

Recommendation (R&R), Magistrate Judge Grand recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for

Summary Judgment be denied and that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment be

granted. The Magistrate Judge also Judge informed the parties that objections to the R&R

2:14-cv-14613-MOB-DRG Doc # 16 Filed 11/30/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 643
needed to be filed within “fourteen (14) days of service” and that a party’s failure to file

objections would waive any further right of appeal. (Doc. No. 15 at 17). Neither party filed

an objection.

Because no objection has been filed in this case, the parties waived their right to de

novo review and appeal. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s

recommendation, DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, GRANTS Defendant’s

Motion for Summary Judgment, and AFFIRMS the ALJ’s decision. Plaintiff’s Complaint is

DISMISSED in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: November 30, 2015 s/Marianne O. Battani 

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's ECF System to their respective

email addresses or First Class U.S. mail to the non-ECF participants on November 30, 2015.

s/ Kay Doaks 

Case Manager

2

2:14-cv-14613-MOB-DRG Doc # 16 Filed 11/30/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 644
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.024-3 Materials, workmanship, construction, and performance requirements. ( a ) *Materials.* The materials used in pistol-projected parachute red flare distress signals shall conform strictly to the specifications and drawings submitted by the manufacturer and approved by the Commandant. In general, all metallic parts shall be corrosion-resistant or properly protected against corrosion.
( b ) *Workmanship.* Pistol-projected parachute red flare distress signals shall be of first class workmanship and shall be free from imperfections of manufacture affecting their appearance or that may affect their serviceability.
( c ) *Construction.* The exterior case of the cartridge shall be made of suitable metal and shall protect against the entrance of moisture. The projectile case and delay element shall be so constructed as to prevent any possibility of the propelling charge blowing by and causing premature ejection of the projectile contents. The shoulder of the base of the cartridge shall be between 2.29 mm (0.090 in.) and 2.67 mm (0.015 in.) in thickness. The centered primer shall be set below the surface of the base between 0.25 mm (0.010 in.) and 0.50 mm (0.020 in.).
( d ) *Performance.* Signals shall meet all of the inspection and test requirements contained in § 160.024-4.
§ 111.60-13 Flexible electric cord and cables. ( a ) *Construction and testing.* Each flexible cord and cable must meet the requirements in Sections 4.4.2. and 4.4.6 of IEEE 45.8-2016, Article 400 of NFPA 70, ANSI/NEMA WC-70, or ANSI/UL 62 (all incorporated by reference; see § 110.10-1 of this subchapter).
( b ) *Application.* No flexible cord may be used except: ( 1 ) As allowed under Sections 400.10 and 400.12 of NFPA 70; and
( 2 ) In accordance with Table 400.4 in NFPA 70.
( c ) *Allowable current-carrying capacity.* No flexible cord may carry more current than allowed under Table 400.5 in NFPA 70, or ANSI/NEMA WC-70.
( d ) *Conductor size.* Each flexible cord must be 18 AWG (0.82 mm2) or larger.
( e ) *Splices.* Each flexible cord and cable must be without splices or taps except for a cord or cable 12 AWG (3.3 mm2) or larger spliced for repairs in accordance with § 111.60-19.
( f ) *Pull at joints and terminals.* Each flexible cord and cable must be connected to a device or fitting by a knot, tape, or special fitting so that tension is not transmitted to joints or terminal screws.
[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15236, Apr. 8, 1982, as amended by CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28281, June 4, 1996; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65198, Oct. 31, 2008; USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16364, Mar. 16, 2023]
#### Raynor v. Page.

JBhidence— *in action to set aside frcmdnilent eomeycmce.*

In an action by a judgment creditor of P. to set aside as fraudulent a transfer of real estate by the judgment debtor to his wife, it was claimed by defendant that the wife paid the consideration named in the deed, and a witness for defendant testified that he loaned her the money and as security took a mortgage on the house belonging to her, and subsequently took a deed of part of the disputed property in 'satisfaction of the mortgage. *Held,*that a question by plaintiff whether witness held that deed as a mortgage or as absolute was proper.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon the report of a referee.

*685The action was brought by William H. Raynor against Mary E. Page and others to set aside as fraudulent a conveyance of real estate.

*Edmund Coffin, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Shaw & Jeroloman,*for respondent.

Barnard, P. J.

The head-note contains the only point of any importance passed upon in the opinion.

*Judgment reversed and new trial granted.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8540

LEE MARVIN WEBB,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVID L. SMITH,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-95-876-R)

Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 29, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lee Marvin Webb, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day period

established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period

provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed.

R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United

States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).

The district court dismissed Appellant's action by order

entered August 22, 1995. On October 10, 1995, Appellant filed some

papers which the district court construed as a motion for reconsideration. The district court denied the motion for reconsideration

on October 27, 1995. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on December 13, 1995. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain

an extension of the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
|   | (1) | Such      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2010, fully      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year      ended February 28, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Next 1 Interactive,      Inc.  |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      June 8, 2010 | /s/ William      Kerby           |   |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------|--------|
|                    | William      Kerby               |   |
|                    | Principal      Executive Officer |   |

----
Exhibit 21.1
 LORAL SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
 SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES
  Loral Space & Communications Holdings Corporation
    
    DelawareLoral Skynet Corporation
    
    DelawareLoral Satellite Broadband LLC
    
    DelawareLoral Satmex LLC
    
    DelawareSpace Systems/Loral, Inc.
    
    DelawareInternational Space Technology, Inc.(1)
    
    DelawareCosmotech(1)
    
    Russian FederationSS/L Isle of Man Limited
    
    Isle of ManLoral General Partner, Inc.
    
    DelawareLGP (Bermuda) Ltd.
    
    BermudaLoral Holdings LLC
    
    DelawareMexico Satellite, LLC(2)
    
    DelawareLoral Global Services N.V.
    
    Netherlands AntillesLoral Global Services B.V.i.l.
    
    NetherlandsLoral Holdings Corporation
    
    Delaware4440480 Canada Inc.
    
    Canada4440498 Canada Inc.
    
    CanadaSS/L Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareLoral Canadian Gateway Corporation
    
    Canada
 NOTES
 (1)
    
    Only 57.1% voting and 47.7% economic interests owned directly or indirectly(2)
    
    Only 77.78% owned directly or indirectly
##### 



Exhibit 21
 Lucent Technologies Comercio e Servicio Ltd.
    
    BrazilLucent Technologies Treasury Services
    
    IrelandLucent Technologies (China) Co., Ltd.
    
    P.R.C.Ascend Communications, Inc.
    
    USBell Laboratories, Inc.
    
    USFirst Beacon Insurance Company
    
    USLTI NJ Finance LLC
    
    USLucent Asset Management Corporation
    
    USLucent Technologies Integrated Solutions Inc.
    
    USLucent Technologies GRL LLC
    
    USLucent Technologies International Inc.
    
    USLucent Technologies World Services Inc.
    
    USNew Jersey Nanotechnology Consortium LLC
    
    USWestern Electric Company, Incorporated
    
    US