alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001006424
<NAME> FIRST FEDERAL BANCSHARES OF ARKANSAS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,548
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              79
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          95,533
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            95,614
<LOANS>                                        435,138
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,196
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 549,607
<DEPOSITS>                                     450,874
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,852
<LONG-TERM>                                     11,997
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,902
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,982
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 549,607
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 33,804
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,224
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   417
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                40,445
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              23,331
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,748
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           16,697
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 394
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 10,016
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,601
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,502
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,502
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.79
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,957
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  4,628
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,251
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       67
<RECOVERIES>                                        12
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,196
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               408
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            788
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.1715 Moisture control. When a vessel is carrying sulfur dioxide, the master shall ensure that: ( a ) A cargo tank is dry before it is loaded with sulfur dioxide; and
( b ) Air or inert gas admitted into a cargo tank carrying sulfur dioxide during discharging or tank breathing has a moisture content equal to or less than the moisture content of air with a dew point of −45 °C (−49 °F) at atmospheric pressure.
[CGD 74-289, 44 FR 26009, May 3, 1979, as amended by USCG-2014-0688, 79 FR 58285, Sept. 29, 2014]
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59783, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 148.245 Direct reduced iron (DRI); lumps, pellets, and cold-molded briquettes. ( a ) Before loading DRI lumps, pellets, or cold-molded briquettes— ( 1 ) The master must have a written certification from a competent person appointed by the shipper and recognized by the Commandant (CG-ENG-5) stating that the DRI, at the time of loading, is suitable for shipment;
( 2 ) The DRI must be aged for at least 3 days, or be treated with an air passivation technique or some other equivalent method that reduces its reactivity to at least the same level as the aged DRI; and
( 3 ) Each hold and bilge must be as clean and dry as practical. Other than double bottom tanks, adjacent ballast tanks must be kept empty when possible. All wooden fixtures, such as battens, must be removed from the hold.
( b ) Each boundary of a hold where DRI lumps, pellets, or cold-molded briquettes are to be carried must be resistant to fire and passage of water.
( c ) DRI lumps, pellets, or cold-molded briquettes that are wet, or that are known to have been wetted, may not be accepted for transport. The moisture content of the DRI must not exceed 0.3 percent prior to loading.
( d ) DRI lumps, pellets and cold-molded briquettes must be protected at all times from contact with water, and must not be loaded or transferred from one vessel to another during periods of rain or snow.
( e ) DRI lumps, pellets, or cold-molded briquettes may not be loaded if their temperature is greater than 65 °C (150 °F).
( f ) The shipper of DRI lumps, pellets, or cold-molded briquettes in bulk must ensure that an inert atmosphere of less than 5 percent oxygen and 1 percent hydrogen, by volume, is maintained throughout the voyage in any hold containing these materials.
( g ) When DRI lumps, pellets, or cold-molded briquettes are loaded, precautions must be taken to avoid the concentration of fines (pieces less than 6.35mm in size) in any one location in the cargo hold.
( h ) Radar and RDF scanners must be protected against the dust generated during cargo transfer operations of DRI lumps, pellets, or cold-molded briquettes.
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.560 Special requirements for Alkyl (C7-C9) nitrates. ( a ) The carriage temperature of octyl nitrates must be maintained below 100 °C (212 °F) in order to prevent the occurrence of a self-sustaining exothermic decomposition reaction.
( b ) Octyl nitrates may not be carried in a deck tank unless the tank has a combination of insulation and a water deluge system sufficient to maintain the tank's cargo temperature below 100 °C (212 °F) and the cargo temperature rise at below 1.5 °C(2.7 °F)/hour, for a fire of 650 °C (1200 °F).
[CGD 88-100, 54 FR 40042, Sept. 29, 1989, as amended by CGD 92-100, 59 FR 17028, Apr. 11, 1994; CGD 94-900, 59 FR 45139, Aug. 31, 1994]
Exhibit 32.1

Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, George G. Andrews, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ George G. AndrewsGeorge G. Andrews, Chief Executive Officer and Director


August 14, 2007



20
§ 11.412 Service requirements for master of ocean or near-coastal self-propelled vessels of less than 1,600 GRT. ( a ) The minimum service required to qualify an applicant for an endorsement as master of ocean or near-coastal self-propelled vessels of less than 1,600 GRT is— ( 1 ) Four years total service on ocean or near-coastal waters. Service on Great Lakes and inland waters may substitute for up to 2 years of the required service. Two years of the required service must have been on vessels of more than 100 GRT. Two years of the required service must have been as a master or mate of self-propelled vessels, or master or mate (pilot) of towing vessels, or equivalent position while holding a license or MMC endorsement as master or mate of self-propelled vessels, or master or mate (pilot) of towing vessels. One year of the service as master or mate of self-propelled vessels, or master or mate (pilot) of towing vessels, or equivalent position must have been on vessels of more than 100 GRT; or
( 2 ) One year of service on vessels of more than 100 GRT on ocean or near-coastal waters as a master or mate of self-propelled vessels, or master or mate of towing vessels while holding a license or MMC endorsement as mate of ocean self-propelled vessels of less than 1,600 GRT or as master or mate of towing vessels.
( b ) An applicant holding a license or MMC endorsement as chief mate of ocean or near-coastal self-propelled vessels of 1,600 GRT or more is eligible for this endorsement without further examination. An applicant holding a license or MMC endorsement as second mate of ocean or near-coastal self-propelled vessels of 1,600 GRT or more is eligible for this endorsement upon completion of a limited examination.
( c ) A person holding this endorsement may qualify for an STCW endorsement, according to § 11.311 of this part.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.042-1 Applicable specification. ( a ) The following specification, of the issue in effect on the date life raft skids are manufactured, forms a part of this subpart: ( 1 ) Coast Guard specification: 160.018, Life Rafts.
( b ) [Reserved]
#### Pettis, appellant, v. Pier.

*Trial*— *charge on matters not in issue*— *when exceptions to charge not necessary.*

The j udge at trial charged that if plaintiff’s agent was negligent plaintiff-could not recover, and stated that there was hardly any evidence of negligence. There was no evidence whatever of negligence. *Held,*that the charge was error.

The court will grant a new trial because of errors in the charge, although ii *t*xcepted to, when it can see that such errors were calculated to, and probably did, mislead the jury.

Appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendant upon the verdict of. a jury and from an order denying a new trial. The *691action was brought by William. H. Pettis against Delos D. Pier and Edwin R. Murray, to recover the value of thirty bales of hops alleged to have been c'onverted by defendants.

*Ball & Searle*and *Citarles Mason,*for appellants.

*Bagg & Collins,*for respondents.

Mullís, P. J.

The head-note states all the points of any importance passed upon in the opinion.

*Judgment reversed and new trial ordered.*
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00416-CR

KRISTOPHER KYLE RUSSELL,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 89th District 

Court

of Wichita County (44,489-C)

May 20, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Dauphinot

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot______________

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
§ 11.323 STCW engineer officer endorsements. ( a ) Specific requirements for all STCW engineer officer endorsements are detailed in the applicable sections in this part. ( 1 ) Chief engineer officer on vessels powered by main propulsion machinery of 3,000 kW/4,000 HP propulsion power or more (management level).
( 2 ) Second engineer officer on vessels powered by main propulsion machinery of 3,000 kW/4,000 HP propulsion power or more (management level).
( 3 ) Officer in charge of an engineering watch (OICEW) in a manned engineroom, or as a designated duty engineer in a periodically unmanned engineroom, on vessels powered by main propulsion machinery of 750 kW/1,000 HP propulsion power or more (operational level).
( 4 ) Chief engineer officer on vessels powered by main propulsion machinery of between 750 kW/1,000 HP and 3,000 kW/4,000 HP propulsion power (management level).
( 5 ) Second engineer officer on vessels powered by main propulsion machinery of 750 kW/1,000 HP to 3,000 kW/4,000 HP propulsion power (management level).
( 6 ) Electro-technical officer on vessels powered by main propulsion machinery of 750 kW/1,000 HP or more (operational level).
( b ) *Limitations.* ( 1 ) STCW engineer officer endorsements issued in accordance with §§ 11.325, 11.327, 11.329, 11.331, 11.333, and 11.335 of this subpart will be restricted to specific propulsion modes for steam, motor, or gas turbine-propelled vessels as appropriate.
( 2 ) STCW engineer officer endorsements issued in accordance with §§ 11.325, 11.327, 11.329, 11.331, 11.333, and 11.335 of this subpart for motor or gas turbine-propelled vessels may be endorsed as limited to serve on vessels without auxiliary boilers, waste-heat boilers, distilling plants, oily water separators, or sewage treatment plants. An applicant may qualify for removal of any of these limitations by demonstrating the appropriate competencies.
( c ) An engineer officer who does not hold an STCW endorsement may serve on seagoing vessels propelled by machinery of less than 750 kW/1,000 HP, the vessels specified in § 15.105(f) and (g) of this subchapter, and vessels operating on the Great Lakes or inland waters of the United States.
( d ) An officer endorsement issued in the grade of chief engineer (limited) or assistant engineer (limited) allows the holder to serve within any propulsion power limitations on vessels of unlimited tonnage on inland waters, on vessels of less than 3,000 GT in Great Lakes service, and on the vessels specified in § 15.105(f) and (g) of this subchapter.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael C. Frederick, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                      |  |     |  |                                                             
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|DATE: August 12, 2008 |  | BY: |  | /s/ Michael C. Frederick                                    
|                      |  |     |  | Michael C. Frederick                                        
|                      |  |     |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|                      |  |     |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Charles D. Talbert,

Plaintiff, 

Case No: 14-14550

Hon. Victoria A. Roberts

v.

Packers Sanitation Services, Inc.,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO ENFORCE 

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT [ECF NO. 26]

Defendant Packers Sanitation Services, Inc., requests enforcement of a

settlement agreement entered into by the parties. Talbert did not respond to the Motion

to Enforce Settlement Agreement. 

Packers says it emailed a settlement offer to Talbert’s counsel on May 11, 2016,

saying “allow this email to serve as Defendant’s written offer to settle this matter for

(redacted) in addition to a mutually agreeable settlement and release agreement.” ECF

No. 26 at 455. Talbert’s counsel acknowledged the offer and said she would relay it to

her client. On May 13, 2016, Talbert’s counsel responded by email saying, “[m]y client

is agreeable to the settlement outlined below.” Id. at 457. Defense counsel put

together a proposed settlement and release and emailed it to Talbert counsel. He also

notified the Court on May 16,2016 that a settlement had been reached, that the parties

1

2:14-cv-14550-VAR-MJH Doc # 27 Filed 06/17/16 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 520
were working on documents, and would forward them to the Court when completed. 

Talbert counsel was copied on this email. On May 23, 2016, Talbert’s counsel told

Packer’s attorney over the phone that her client decided not to settle. 

Packers says the parties have a valid settlement agreement; Talbert accepted

the offer to settle. The Court agrees that settlement was reached on all material terms:

payment and release. “Before enforcing settlement, the district court must conclude

that agreement has been reached on all material terms.” Brock v. Scheuner Corp., 841

F.2d 151, 154 (6th Cir. 1988). 

The parties agreed on a settlement amount. Defense counsel sent proposed

settlement documents to Tarra Talbert, but there is no record that those settlement

documents were ever signed by Talbert. However, the existence of a valid agreement

is not diminished by the fact that the parties have yet to memorialize the agreement. 

Remax Int’l, Inc. v. Reality One, Inc., 271 F.3d 633 (6th Cir. 2001).

Furthermore, since Talbert did not respond to the Motion to Enforce, his failure to

respond is construed by the Court to mean that he does not oppose the relief

requested.

Packers’ Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement is GRANTED. The case is

DISMISSED with Prejudice. 

IT IS ORDERED. 

 /s/ Victoria A. Roberts 

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

Dated: June 17, 2016

2

2:14-cv-14550-VAR-MJH Doc # 27 Filed 06/17/16 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 521
The undersigned certifies that a copy of this

document was served on the attorneys of

record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

June 17, 2016.

s/Linda Vertriest 

Deputy Clerk

3

2:14-cv-14550-VAR-MJH Doc # 27 Filed 06/17/16 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 522
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.072-3 General performance requirements. ( a ) Each flag must: ( 1 ) Be a square or rectangle at least 90 cm (36 inches) wide and at least 90 cm (36 inches) long. If the flag is a rectangle, the shorter side cannot be less than 2 ⁄ 3 the length of the longer side;
( 2 ) Have no less than 70% of the total area colored a bright red-orange color;
( 3 ) Display a black disc and a black square on the red-orange background on both sides arranged as follows: ( i ) The diameter of the disc and the length of one side of the square shall be equal, and shall each be 1 ⁄ 3 of the length of the longest side of the flag, or 30 cm (12 inches), whichever is greater.
( ii ) The disc and square must be centered on one axis of the flag parallel to the longest side of the flag as shown in Figure 160.072-3. If the flag is a square, the axis may be parallel to any side. Figure 160.072-3
( iii ) The disc and square shall be separated by a distance of 1 ⁄ 6 the length of the longest side of the flag or 15 cm (6 inches), whichever is greater.
( 4 ) Be capable of passing the accelerated weathering test of § 160.072-5;
( 5 ) Have reinforced corners, each with a grommet; and,
( 6 ) Be packaged with 4 pieces of line, with a tensile strength of at least 225 N (Newtons) (50 lbs) no less than 30 cm (12 inches) long, capable of passing through the grommets freely.
( b ) [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.907 Cargo information. ( a ) The master shall ensure that the following information for each cargo carried under this part is readily available to those on the tankship engaged in cargo operations: ( 1 ) The name of the cargo as listed in table 1.
( 2 ) A description of the cargo's appearance and color.
( 3 ) Hazards in handling the cargo.
( 4 ) Any special handling procedures for the cargo, such as inerting.
( 5 ) Procedures to follow if the cargo spills or leaks.
( 6 ) Procedures for treating a person exposed to the cargo.
( 7 ) A list of fire fighting procedures and extinguishing agents effective with cargo fires.
( 8 ) Shipper's name.
( 9 ) Loading point.
( 10 ) Approximate quantity of cargo.
( 11 ) Tank in which the cargo is located.
( 12 ) The name of an agent in the United States authorized to accept service of legal process for the vessel.
( b ) The master shall make sure that the following information for cargoes other than those carried under this part is readily available on the tankship: ( 1 ) The name of the cargo as listed in Table 4 of Part 154 of this chapter or § 30.25-1 of this chapter if the cargo is listed in one of these two tables.
( 2 ) The name of the cargo prescribed in the letter authorizing carriage of the cargo under § 153.900(d) if the cargo is a hazardous or flammable cargo authorized for carriage under that section.
( 3 ) The shipper's name for the cargo and the name of the shipper if the cargo is neither a hazardous nor flammable cargo.
[CGD 81-078, 50 FR 21174, May 22, 1985, as amended by CGD 88-100, 54 FR 40042, Sept. 29, 1989]
EXHIBIT  32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly Report of Network Installation Corporation,
(the  "Company")  on  Form  10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),

I,  Michael  Cummings, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.



/s/  Michael  Cummings
--------------------------------------
Michael  Cummings
Chief  Executive  Officer
Dated:  May  24,  2004

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United  States  Code)  and  is  not  being  filed  as part of the Report or as a
separate  disclosure  document.