alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**21**
**st**

**      Century Holding Company**

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                21st                Century Holding Company. |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:                /*s/                James G. Jennings, III*     |                  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| **James                G. Jennings, III, Chief Financial Officer** | **November                14, 2006** |
|                                                               |                                 |
|                                                               |                                 |

----
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Artificial Life, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Eberhard Schoeneburg, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.


                            /s/ Eberhard Schoeneburg

                              Eberhard Schoeneburg
                           Chief Executive Officer and
                           Principal Financial Officer

November 13, 2003
###### Editorial Note on Part 151

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 151.05-2 Compliance with requirements for tank barges carrying benzene and benzene containing cargoes, or butyl acrylate cargoes.

A tank barge certificated to carry benzene and benzene containing cargoes or butyl acrylate cargoes must comply with the gauging requirement of Table 151.05 of this part by August 15, 1998. Until that date, a tank barge certificated to carry benzene and benzene containing cargoes must meet either the gauging requirement of Table 151.05 or the restricted or closed gauging requirements in effect on September 29, 1994; and a tank barge certificated to carry butyl acrylate cargoes must meet either the gauging requirements of Table 151.05 or comply with the open, restricted, or closed gauging requirements in effect on September 29, 1994.

[CGD 95-900, 60 FR 34050, June 29, 1995]
#### FRANK A. GILLAN, RESPONDENT, v. BOROUGH OF EAST NEWARK, HUDSON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT.

Submitted May 8, 1929

Decided July 5, 1929.

' Before Justices Parker, Black and Bodine.

*617For the respondent, *Tumulty & Tumulty.*

For the appellant, *Wother & Oilhooly.*

Per Curiam.

The pertinent facts, as stated by the District Court, are as follows: The plaintiff had been employed as auditor by the defendant for a period of twenty-one years at a yearly salary. In the months of December, 1927, and January, 1928, it became apparent to the council of the borough that there were irregularities in the account of one of the officials, and on February 7th the plaintiff was authorized and directed, by resolution of the council, to investigate and report as to the shortages. On February 8th he began the investigation and made a survey of four hundred and ninety-eight accounts connected with the water supply, gave notices to all those who were concerned in the water accounts, and discovered a shortage of $7,600 on March 14th. Later, on March 26th, he made a supplemental account, and thereafter met with certified accountants to aid them in their work and 'to verify his report. He spent six weeks of eight-hour days on this work. It was entirely aside from the routine work which he had been called upon to perform as auditor at his yearly salary. He presented a claim to the defendant for $500. Nothing had been said expressly as to compensation by the parties when the work was undertaken, or as it progressed.

A public officer cannot receive extra money for extra work. *Evans*v. *Trenton,*24 *N. J. L.*764. The District Court, however, found that Gillan was not .a borough officer and had performed his extra work under the expectation of payment. A municipality might properly agree to pay an employe additional money for additional work. *Crane*v. *Shoenthal,*76 *N. J. L.*378. There can also be a recovery on a *quantum meruit*for work and materials furnished at the request of a municipality. *Wentink*v. *Passaic,*66 *N. J. L.*65.

This leads to an affirmance of the judgment below.
§ 113.40-10 Detailed requirements. ( a ) Each rudder angle indicator system must have a transmitter at the rudder head that is actuated by movement of the rudder with the angular movements of the rudder transmitted to a remote indicator or indicators. This system must be independent of all other systems and not receive power or signal from the steering gear control, autopilot, or dynamic positioning systems. However, the indicator may be physically located on a control console, such as an integrated bridge system, if it is readily visible by the helmsman at the steering stand.
( b ) Each electric component or its enclosure must meet Type 4 or 4X of NEMA 250 or IP 56 of IEC 60529:2013 (both incorporated by reference; see § 110.10-1 of this subpart) requirements.
[CGD 74-125A, 47 FR 15272, Apr. 8, 1982, as amended by CGD 94-108, 61 FR 28290, June 4, 1996; 62 FR 23910, May 1, 1997; USCG-2003-16630, 73 FR 65202, Oct. 31, 2008; USCG-2020-0075, 88 FR 16369, Mar. 16, 2023]
Exhibit 21.1
  LORAL
    SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
  SIGNIFICANT
    SUBSIDIARIES
    Loral Space & Communications Holdings Corporation

DelawareLoral Skynet Corporation

DelawareLoral Satmex LLC

DelawareSpace Systems/Loral, Inc.

DelawareInternational Space Technology,
    Inc.(1)

DelawareCosmotech(1)

Russian FederationSS/L Isle of Man Limited

Isle of ManLoral General Partner, Inc.

DelawareLGP (Bermuda) Ltd.

BermudaLoral Holdings LLC

DelawareMexico Satellite,
    LLC(2)

DelawareLoral Global Services N.V.

Netherlands AntillesLoral Global Services B.V.

NetherlandsLoral Holdings Corporation

Delaware4440480 Canada Inc.

Canada4440498 Canada Inc.

Canada   NOTES
 (1)

    
    Only 51.0% owned directly or indirectly(2)

    
    Only 77.78% owned directly or indirectly
§ 115.204 Permit to carry excursion party. ( a ) The cognizant OCMI may permit a vessel to engage in a temporary excursion operation with a greater number of persons or on a more extended route, or both, than permitted by its Certificate of Inspection when, in the opinion of the OCMI, the operation can be undertaken safely.
( b ) Upon the written application of the owner or managing operator of the vessel, the cognizant OCMI may issue a Form CG-949, “Permit to Carry Excursion Party.” to indicate his or her permission to carry an excursion party. The OCMI will indicate on the permit the conditions under which it is issued, the number of persons the vessel may carry, the crew required, any additional lifesaving or safety equipment required, the route for which the permit is granted, and the dates on which the permit is valid.
( c ) The number of passengers normally permitted on an excursion vessel is governed by § 115.113 of this part.
( d ) The OCMI will not normally waive applicable minimum safety standards when issuing an excursion permit. In particular, a vessel that is being issued an excursion permit will normally be required to meet the minimum stability, survival craft, life jacket, fire safety, and manning standards applicable to a vessel in the service for which the excursion permit is requested
( e ) The permit acts as a temporary, limited duration supplement to the vessel's Certificate of Inspection and must be carried with the Certificate of Inspection. A vessel operating under a permit to carry an excursion party must be in full compliance with the terms of its Certificate of Inspection as supplemented by the permit.
( f ) The OCMI may require an inspection prior to the issuance of a permit to carry an excursion party.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Capital, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William W. Harrod, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                        |  |     |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|DATE: November 14, 2007 |  | BY: |  | /s/ William W. Harrod                
|                        |  |     |  | William W. Harrod                    
|                        |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                        |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel; Childhood Asthma Managed Program—Cooperative Agreements.                    

*Date:*                         May 3, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         12 p.m. to 1:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Blaine B. Moore, PhD, Health Scientist Administrator, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7202, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-0050,                         *mooreb@nhlbi.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 30, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-1681  Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
New Jersey Department of Labor, Workmen’s Compensation Bureau.

#### ELIAS MILLS, PETITIONER, v. INTERNATIONAL MOTOR COMPANY, RESPONDENT.

A petition having been filed under the Workmen’s Compensation act of 1911 as amended, and having come on the calendar for trial in the presence of the petitioner’s attorney and the respondent and its attorney, and testimony having been taken wherein it appeared to the court that the petitioner *217alleged to have received a hernia on October 1st, 1927, while sweeping up the floor and moving some castings about the floor. That he complained to the foreman of a pain in his groin and the foreman took him home in his car. That the same night the petitioner called a doctor who took him to the hospital and operated on him the following morning for a femoral hernia.

That the physician for the respondent testified that he examined this petitioner on June 14th, 1927, and that he had a right inguinal hernia. That the petitioner had complained of a pain in his groin as a result of an accident he had on February 11th, 1927, while lifting a crate weighing about five hundred pounds and two men dropped their end of it, leaving him and another man holding the balance. That he lacerated the third and fourth fingers of the right hand.

That at the time of the examination by the respondent’s physician on June 14th, 1927, he prepared a report on Form C and filed a copy with the State of New Jersey, which was offered in evidence, showing that the petitioner had a small mass in the right inguinal region and that he had a right inguinal hernia.

That the petitioner denies any knowledge of having had a hernia prior to October 1st, 1927, but the significant point is that the mass which was there on June 14th, 1927, is not there now, and whether or not it was inguinal or femoral, he did have a hernia prior to October 1st, 1927.

That the Compensation act of New Jersey is strict in the requirements as to a hernia, and I find, as a fact, that the petitioner did have a hernia prior to October 1st, 1927, and having had a hernia, that he could not sustain a hernia on October 1st, 1927, to bring him within the contemplation of the hernia section of the act.

That the petitioner did say that he felt a mass in the hernial region which he could move back and forth and that he does not feel it now.

That the petitioner did not wear a truss nor have an operation for the hernia he had on June 14th, 1927, and the testimony of the petitioner was that the only cure for a hernia was an operation.

*218It is therefore ordered that the petition be, and same is hereby" dismissed on the ground that the petitioner had a hernia prior to October 1st, 1927, and, therefore, the hernia which he alleged to have sustained on October 1st, 1927, is not compensable.

John J. Stahl,

*Referee.*
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7698
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GARY ELLIOTT HOKE, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CR-91-1-MU) Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 26, 1997 Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Elliott Hoke, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order denying Appellant's motion to amend his presentence report. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hoke , No. CR-91-1-MU (W.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 144.140 Qualifications.

Use the following table to determine the individual or entity that may conduct a verification of compliance with design standards required by § 144.135.

| Verification of compliance with design standards may be performed by— | Provided that— |
| --- | --- |
| (a) A registered professional engineer (P.E.) licensed by one of the states of the United States or the District of Columbia; | The PE ensures he or she does not exceed the scope of his or her P.E. license. |
| (b) An authorized classification society that has been delegated the authority to issue the SOLAS Cargo Ship Safety Construction Certificate under 46 CFR 8.320; | The authorized classification society ensures that the employees that perform the verification of compliance holds proper qualifications for the type of verification performed. |
| (c) The Coast Guard | |

Table 144.140
Exhibit (10)(a)

    

    

    

    

    

    

    Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    

    

    

    

    We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 38 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141756) and Amendment No. 404 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08441), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2020, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company
      of New York and (b) April 15, 2020, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

    June 5, 2020
0

0321

2

87080

FOR’ RELEASE: MONDAY . CONTACT: FRED EILAND* :
JANUARY .20, 1986 SHARON SNYDER
KAREN FINUCAN

PAC NUMBERS. CONTINUE oo
TO DROP IN 1985

WASHINGTON -- For the second six-month period in a row, the
number of PAC's declined, according to figures released by.

the Federal Election Commission today. As of December 31, 1985,
there were 3,992 PAC's in existence, a drop from the 4,000 ,
registered on July 1.

The FEC releas official counts of registered PAC's twice

yearly, in January and July. Figures below represent PAC growth

over the past ten yecrs.

® Federal Klection Ocurieston sweet cocemt — HCH 1974 Jenuacy 1986
Preas Office
(202) 523-4065, .
(000) 424-9530"
Tete Comitton Type ‘total
Corporate Tabor ‘rrate/ (Corporation
‘Membacshipy ‘without.
Mealth ‘Stock
——— —— —— —
pavarsia 2 Ea muse oo
Ba/4/752/ ) Es Esa Tz
=] Ed ox m2
Hayai776 3 ET] = Lue
pavai77 0 EZ) a v7] O 2 1.3600
2/31/78 kd 27 “3 2 2B a” 1,63
a) cI Zs = 26 3 Z 1.60
paar ‘50 EI su Ed 7 E} 2,000
fA 2,187 = TM“ E=) E) a 2,279
p2raveo 1,206 Ea a Ed a * 2,551
waa 1.33 x ‘00. cy EY « 2.678
paar 1 ET) as Ey a a 2,901
WA 1a 0 Cc Ss a EAC)
faa 10 EJ er 3 a cz) 33
jas 2,504 39 “ 0 30 ue 3,461.
peas 1,538 Ec Co 3 ‘st a2 355.
7) Lez Ea Co 30 3 13s 3,003
Poa 12 TM oe 2,053 sz 130 4,009
jas 2.7 3 “~ 1,099 EI 23 4,000
baalas ne a Co 2,003 EI wa 3.992
h Moveaber 34-1975, the Commission issued Aivisory Opinion 1975-23, RAN»
¥ Poe Che poate 1574 I97Es theoe iusbace repeement all Gther iS Stantteesss tno further Cabegocitation is available.

Note: Not all registered PAC's make contributions to candidates during a two-year
election cycle. For example, only 3,046 of the 4,347 PAC's included in the FEC's 1983-84
Final Report on PAC activity actually made contributions to federal candidates.

Details on PAC contributions to candidates are included in FEC press releases which —
summarize PAC activities. The most recent'is the Dec. 1, 1985, release entitled

“FEC FINAL REPORT FOR '84 ELECTIONS....". .
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2037 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2037

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exception to 
 the reduction of renewable energy credit for certain authority under 
          the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 22, 2009

 Ms. Herseth Sandlin (for herself and Mr. Fortenberry) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exception to 
 the reduction of renewable energy credit for certain authority under 
          the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Energy Equity Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO REDUCTION OF RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Section 45(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to credit reduced for grants, tax-exempt bonds, 
subsidized energy financing, and other credits) is amended by adding 
after the last sentence the following: ``This paragraph shall not apply 
with respect to any loan guarantees or grants issued by the Secretary 
of Agriculture under authority granted by section 9007 of the Farm 
Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to facilities placed in service after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.6
  AMENDED AND RESTATED CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT
 ____________
____________
____________
  Matrixx Company Previous
Agreement Code Section 11
 Agreement
 .
  .
 Section 6 Section 4 Section 5




---



##### 



th Section 5
 Section 7
 th
  .
  Section 3
 2




---



##### 



.
 Change of Control
 Exchange Act
  Incumbent Board
  3




---



##### 



.
 Good Reason
 .
 Cause
 Section 15
  Disability
 4




---



##### 



.
    .
  .
  .
  5




---



##### 



.
  .
  .
  .
 Rules AAA
 .
  6




---



##### 



.
  .
    7




---



##### 



Sincerely,
MATRIXX INITIATIVES, INC.By:Name:
    William J. HemeltIts:
    President and Chief Executive Officer   Dated:SignatureName
 8