alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2026 

To amend the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 to make non-union training 

programs eligible for Federal funding under the ‘‘Green Jobs’’ program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 22, 2009 

Mr. KLINE of Minnesota (for himself, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. WILSON of South 

Carolina, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. 

BARTLETT, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. PRICE of Georgia, Mr. JORDAN of 

Ohio, Mr. LATTA, Mr. MARCHANT, and Mr. CONAWAY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 

Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 to make 

non-union training programs eligible for Federal funding 

under the ‘‘Green Jobs’’ program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Green Jobs Improve5 ment Act’’. 


SMARTINEZ on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HR 2026 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF NON-UNION PROGRAMS FOR 

2 GREEN JOBS FUNDING. 

3 Section 171(e) of the Workforce Investment Act of 

4 1998 (29 U.S.C. 2916(e)) is amended— 

5 (1) by amending subclause (I) of paragraph 

6 (2)(B)(ii) to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(I) includes participation of in8 dustry and may include workforce in9 vestment boards, community-based or10 ganizations, qualified service and con11 servation corps, educational institu12 tions, small businesses, public employ13 ers, cooperatives, State and local vet14 erans agencies, veterans service orga15 nizations, and labor organizations, in16 cluding joint labor-management train17 ing programs; and’’; 

18 (2) in paragraph (2)(D)(iii)(I), by striking ‘‘in19 cludes the equal participation of’’ and all that fol20 lows and inserting ‘‘includes participation of indus21 try and may include workforce investment boards, 

22 community-based organizations, qualified service and 

23 conservation corps, educational institutions, small 

24 businesses, public employers, cooperatives, State and 

25 local veterans agencies, veterans service organizaVerDate Nov 24 2008 04:50 Apr 23, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2026.IH H2026

SMARTINEZ on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HR 2026 IH

1 tions, and labor organizations, including joint labor2 management training programs’’; 

3 (3) in paragraph (2)(E)(ii)(I)— 

4 (A) by inserting ‘‘and’’ after ‘‘adults or 

5 youth,’’; and 

6 (B) by striking ‘‘, and labor organizations 

7 representing workers in such industry sectors’’; 

8 and 

9 (4) by amending paragraph (4) to read as fol10 lows: 

11 ‘‘(4) WORKER PROTECTIONS AND NON12 DISCRIMINATION REQUIREMENTS.—The provisions 

13 of sections 181 and 188 shall apply to all programs 

14 carried out with assistance under this subsection.’’. 

Æ 


SMARTINEZ on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
§ 131.810 General alarm bell. Each general alarm bell must be identified by red letters at least 13 millimeters (1 ⁄ 2-inch) high that state the following: “GENERAL ALARM—WHEN BELL RINGS GO TO YOUR STATION.”
# C_2013171EN.01004101.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/41

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 24.4.2013 — CB v Commission

(Case F-73/11) (1)

1

(Civil service - Officials - Open competition - Notice of competition EPSO/AD/181/10 - Non-admission to the assessment tests)

2013/C 171/84

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CB (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, C. Bernard-Glanz and A. Blot, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall, acting as Agent, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul the decision not to admit the applicant to the assessment tests in the competition EPSO/AD/181/10.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by CB. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by CB.

| 3. | Orders CB to bear half of his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders CB to bear half of his own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.11, p. 53.

1

---
§ 131.870 Life floats and buoyant apparatus. ( a ) The name of the vessel must be plainly marked or painted on each life float or buoyant apparatus, and on each oar and paddle.
( b ) The number of persons each life float or buoyant apparatus is approved for must be plainly marked or painted on each float or apparatus in letters and numbers at least 38 millimeters (1- 1 ⁄ 2 inches) high and in a color contrasting to that of the float or apparatus. This number must— ( 1 ) Be the number of persons the float or apparatus is equipped for; and
( 2 ) Not be greater than the number of persons the float or apparatus is approved for, as shown on its nameplate.
§ 137.330 Scope of the drydock examination. ( a ) This regulation applies to all towing vessels covered by this subchapter. The drydock examination must be conducted while the vessel is hauled out of the water or placed in a drydock or slipway. The Coast Guard inspector or surveyor conducting this examination must: ( 1 ) Examine the exterior of the hull, including bottom, sides, headlog, and stern, and examine all appendages for damage, fractures, wastage, pitting, or improper repairs;
( 2 ) Examine each tail shaft for bends, cracks, and damage, including the sleeves or other bearing contact surfaces on the tail shaft for wear. The tail shaft need not be removed for examination if these items can otherwise be properly evaluated;
( 3 ) Examine the rudders for damage, the upper and lower bearings for wear, and the rudder stock for damage or wear. Rudders need not be removed for examination if these items can be otherwise properly evaluated. This also includes other underwater components of steering and propulsion mechanisms;
( 4 ) Examine the propellers for cracks and damage;
( 5 ) Examine the exterior components of the machinery cooling system for leaks, damage, or deterioration;
( 6 ) Open and examine all sea chests, through-hull fittings, and strainers for damage, deterioration, or fouling; and
( 7 ) On wooden vessels, pull fastenings as required for examination.
( b ) An internal structural examination required by this part may be conducted while the vessel is afloat or while it is out of the water. It consists of a complete examination of the vessel's main strength members, including the major internal framing, the hull plating and planking; voids; and ballast, cargo, and fuel oil tanks. Where the internal framing, plating, or planking of the vessel is concealed, sections of the lining, ceiling, or insulation may be removed or the parts otherwise probed or exposed to determine the condition of the hull structure. Fuel oil tanks need not be cleaned out and internally examined if the general condition of the tanks is determined to be satisfactory by an external examination.
- 1 - 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director and 

Associate General Counsel 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

1212 New York Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

202.842.4184 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

March 8, 2011 

via email and regulations.gov 

Esta Rosenberg 

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Joint Application of Delta/Alitalia/Pinnacle 

 For a Statement of Authorization 

 Docket DOT-OST-2001-10417 

 

Dear Ms. Rosenberg: 

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all carriers on the service list to the above 

referenced application filed earlier today and there are no objections. In these circumstances, 

we urge that the application be granted as soon as possible. 

 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

cc: Megan Rosia, Counsel for Pinnacle 

 Richard Mathias, Counsel for Alitalia 

 David Endersbee, Counsel for Alitalia 

info@airlineinfo.com
§ 117.206 Survival craft—vessels operating on Great Lakes routes. ( a ) Except as allowed by paragraph (b) of this section, each vessel certificated to operate on a Great Lakes route must be provided with the survival craft required by §§ 117.205 (a) through (d) of this part as applicable.
( b ) Each vessel certificated to operate on a Great Lakes route within one mile of land is not required to carry survival craft if the OCMI determines that it is safe not to do so, taking into consideration the vessel's scope of operation, hazards of the route, and availability of assistance.
<PAGE>

                 Subsidiaries
                 ------------

MUSE Federal Systems Group, Inc.-New Mexico

Virtual Presence, LTD-U.K.

Virtual Presence, Inc.-Delaware

Virtual Presence Medical, LTD-U.K. (inactive)

VR Solutions, LTD-U.K. (inactive)

SARL SIM Team-France (92% owned by registrant)

Simulation Solutions, LTD-U.K.

Advanced Visual Systems Inc.-Delaware

Advanced Visual Systems A/S-Denmark

Advanced Visual Systems Sarl-France

Advanced Visual Systems GmbH-Germany

Advanced Visual Systems Ltd.-U.K.

Advanced Visual Systems SRL-Italy
# C_2012065EN.01000201.xml

| 3.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/2

---

Appeal brought on 29 July 2011 by Zdeněk Altner against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 6 July 2011 in Case T-190/11 Altner v Commission

(Case C-411/11 P)

2012/C 65/02

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Zdeněk Altner (represented by: J. Čapek, advokát)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

By order of 15 December 2012 the Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered Z. Altner to bear his own costs.

---
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.1116 Prewash for tanks unloaded without following the approved Procedures and Arrangements Manual: Categories B and C. If for any reason more Category B or C NLS residue remains in a cargo tank and transfer piping of a ship after unloading than would remain after a normal discharge of the cargo when the unloading procedures in the approved Procedures and Arrangements Manual are followed, the tank must be prewashed following the procedures in § 153.1120 unless— ( a ) Section 153.1114 allows the prewash to be omitted; or
( b ) The residue is reduced using another procedure, and a Surveyor estimates and states in the Cargo Record Book that the cargo tank and transfer piping contain no more NLS residue than they would if discharged following the procedures in the approved Procedures and Arrangements Manual, and no other prewash is required by this part.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17907-17908]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1799]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Date and Time: Tuesday, April 17, 2007, 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time.

Place: Clarence M. Mitchell, Jr. Conference Room on the Ninth Floor of 
the EEOC Office Building, 1801 ``L'' Street, NW., Washington, DC 20507.

Status: The meeting will be open to the public.

Matters to be Considered: 

Open Session: 
    1. Announcement of Notation Votes,
    2. Perspectives on Work/Family Balance and the Federal Equal 
Employment Opportunity Laws, and
    3. Headquarters Project Management and Relocation Services 
Contract.

    Note: In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the meeting will be 
open to public observation of the Commission's deliberations and 
voting. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC Commission 
meetings in the Federal Register, the Commission also provides a 
recorded announcement a full week in advance on future Commission 
sessions.)

    Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at 
any

[[Page 17908]]

time for information on these meetings. The EEOC provides sign language 
interpretation at Commission meetings for the hearing impaired. 
Requests for other reasonable accommodations may be made by using the 
voice and TTY numbers listed above.

Contact Person for More Information: Stephen Llewellyn, Acting 
Executive Officer on (202) 663-4070.

    This Notice Issued April 6, 2007.
Stephen Llewellyn,
Acting Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 07-1799 Filed 4-6-07; 1:03 pm]
BILLING CODE 6570-06-M
# CE2010046EN.01012001.xml

| 24.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 46/120 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 46/120

---

Cooperation in the regulation of civil aviation safety *

P6_TA(2009)0001

P6_TA(2009)0001

European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 January 2009 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of an Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America on cooperation in the regulation of civil aviation safety (10972/2007 - COM(2007)0325 – C6-0275/2008 – 2007/0111(CNS))

(2010/C 46 E/21)

(Consultation procedure)

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (10972/2007 - COM(2007)0325), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (10972/2007 - COM(2007)0325),

| — | having regard to Article 80(2), Article 133(4), Article 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence, and Article 300(4) of the EC Treaty, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 80(2), Article 133(4), Article 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence, and Article 300(4) of the EC Treaty,

| — | having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0275/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0275/2008),

| — | having regard to Rules 51, 83(7) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 51, 83(7) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0468/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0468/2008),

| 1. | Approves conclusion of the agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves conclusion of the agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the United States of America. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the United States of America.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

Sherry L. Duffie, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

The Michigan Group, Inc. – 

Livingson d/b/a Re/Max Platinum, 

Defendant. 

________________________________/

Case No. 14-cv-14148 

Hon. Judith E. Levy 

Mag. Judge David R. Grand 

JUDGMENT 

Following a jury verdict, judgment is entered for plaintiff against 

defendant in the amount of $132,750.00, plus taxable costs, attorney 

fees, and costs to be determined.

Dated: February 16, 2016 s/Judith E. Levy 

Ann Arbor, Michigan JUDITH E. LEVY 

United States District Judge 

 

Case 5:14-cv-14148-JEL-DRG ECF No. 57, PageID.1555 Filed 02/16/16 Page 1 of 2
Approved as to form: 

 

By: /s/Elisabeth A. Gusfa 

 Raymond J. Sterling (P34456)

 Elisabeth A. Gusfa (P77273) 

Brian J. Farrar (P79404) 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

By: /s/William E. Pilchak 

 William E. Pilchak (P29545) 

 William T. Russell (P40062) 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

Case 5:14-cv-14148-JEL-DRG ECF No. 57, PageID.1556 Filed 02/16/16 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.048-7 Procedure for approval. ( a ) *Group approval.* A single group approval will be granted to each manufacturer to cover all buoyant cushions which have materials and construction strictly in conformance with this subpart, which are 2 inches thick, and which are filled with kapok or fibrous glass in accordance with § 160.048-4(c)(1).
( b ) *Special approvals.* Special approvals will be granted separately to each manufacturer for each kapok or fibrous glass buoyant cushion he proposes to manufacture which is not included under the group approval provided by paragraph (b) of this section, for example: A kapok or fibrous glass buoyant cushion having cover material not specifically provided for by this subpart; or any buoyant cushion more than 2 inches thick; or any buoyant cushion having a different shape.
( c ) A buoyant cushion is approved when it bears the compliance label of the recognized laboratory.
[CGFR 70-143, 35 FR 19963, Dec. 30, 1970, as amended by CGD 72-163R, 38 FR 8119, Mar. 28, 1973; CGD 93-055, 61 FR 13930, Mar. 28, 1996; 61 FR 15162, Apr. 4, 1996]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 2:13−cr−20892−GCS−RSW

Hon. George Caram Steeh

Kutub Mesiwala, et al.,

Defendant(s),

NOTICE TO APPEAR

 The following defendant(s) are hereby notified to appear: Kutub Mesiwala

 The defendant(s) shall appear before District Judge George Caram Steeh at the United

States District Court, Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse, 231 W. Lafayette Boulevard, Room

767, Detroit, Michigan, for the following proceeding(s):

• SENTENCING: May 25, 2021 at 12:30 PM

 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Parties must use the Lafayette Street entrance to enter

the courthouse. Parties are advised not to appear earlier than 10 minutes prior to the hearing.

Certificate of Service

 I hereby certify that this Notice was electronically filed, and the parties and/or counsel of

record were served.

By: s/Leanne Hosking 

Acting in the absence of Brianna Sauve

Dated: April 14, 2021

Case 2:13-cr-20892-GCS-RSW ECF No. 485, PageID.3493 Filed 04/14/21 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

Pro se Plaintiff Wesley Cooper filed an Emergency Motion for Discovery on December 

24, 2014. (Dkt. 11.) Defendant Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the 

Amended Complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) is currently pending. (Dkt. 3; see Dkt. 10.) A Rule 

12(b)(6) motion asks the Court to decide whether the plaintiff has a claim to relief if all the 

allegations of the Complaint are assumed to be true. In deciding a 12(b)(6) motion, the court 

must “accept all well-pleaded factual allegations as true and construe the complaint in the light 

most favorable to plaintiffs.” Bennet v. MIS Corp., 607 F.3d 1076, 1091 (6th Cir. 2010). In 

general, “a district court may not consider matters beyond the complaint” when analyzing a 

motion to dismiss. Winget v. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 537 F.3d 565, 575 (6th Cir. 2008). 

Therefore, no discovery is needed for a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6). See Gettings v. 

Building Laborers Local 310 Fringe Benefits Fund, 349 F.3d 300, 304 (6th Cir. 2003) 

(“Limitations on pretrial discovery are appropriate where claims may be dismissed ‘based on legal 

determinations that could not have been altered by any further discovery.’” (quoting Muzquiz v. W.A. 

Foote Memorial Hosp., Inc., 70 F.3d 422, 430 (6th Cir. 1995).). The Court sees no need for discovery 

WESLEY COOPER, 

 Plaintiff, 

 

v. 

 

COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 14-cv-14137 

Honorable Laurie J. Michelson 

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Hluchaniuk 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR DISCOVERY [11] 

2:14-cv-14137-LJM-MJH Doc # 12 Filed 12/30/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 206
2 

at this point in the litigation. Therefore, Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion for Discovery (Dkt. 11) is 

DENIED. 

s/Laurie J. Michelson 

LAURIE J. MICHELSON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: December 30, 2014 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing document was served on the attorneys 

and/or parties of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on December 30, 2014. 

 s/Jennifer McCoy 

Case Manager 

2:14-cv-14137-LJM-MJH Doc # 12 Filed 12/30/14 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 207
# C_2008320EN.01001501.xml

| 16.12.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/15

---

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2008/C 320/07)

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1), following which no request for a review was lodged, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will shortly expire.

1

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (2).

2

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Silicon | Russia | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 2229/2003 (OJ L 339, 24.12.2003, p. 3) as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 821/2004 (OJ L 127, 29.4.2004, p. 1) | 25.12.2008 |
| Undertaking | Commission Decision 2004/445/EC (OJ L 127, 29.4.2004, p. 114) |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Silicon

Russia

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 2229/2003 (OJ L 339, 24.12.2003, p. 3) as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 821/2004 (OJ L 127, 29.4.2004, p. 1)

25.12.2008

Undertaking

Commission Decision 2004/445/EC (OJ L 127, 29.4.2004, p. 114)

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 19.7.2008, p. 22.

1

(2)  OJ L 56, 6.3.1996, p. 1.

2

---