alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information  extracted from the annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended  September  30, 2000 and is  qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          10,178
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    112,373
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          16,192
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            16,081
<LOANS>                                        365,941
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,703
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 522,874
<DEPOSITS>                                     325,106
<SHORT-TERM>                                   157,412
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,474
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            36
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,846
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 522,874
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 26,005
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,265
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   822
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                36,092
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,923
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,130
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           13,962
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      220
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  19
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 10,340
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,995
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,995
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,141
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.53
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.13
<LOANS-NON>                                        123
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                439,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,503
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       20
<RECOVERIES>                                        24
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,703
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,703
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.24 Foreign flag vessel: IMO Certificate. ( a ) An IMO Certificate issued under the IMO Resolution A.328(IX),”Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk, 1975” is usually sufficient evidence of compliance with this part for the Coast Guard to endorse a foreign flag vessel's Certificate of Compliance with the name of each cargo in Table 4 (follows § 154.1872) that is listed on the IMO Certificate, if the information listed in item 3 of the IMO Certificate shows that— ( 1 ) The design ambient temperatures meet § 154.174 and § 154.176;
( 2 ) The cargo tank design stress factors and resulting MARVS of independent tanks type B or C meet § 154.447 or § 154.450; and
( 3 ) The cargo tank MARVS of a type IIPG ship meets § 172.175(c) of this chapter.
( b ) If a foreign flag existing gas vessel meets § 154.12 (b), (c), or (d), the vessel's IMO Certificate issued under the IMO “Code for Existing Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk, 1975” is usually sufficient evidence of compliance with the requirements of § 154.12(e) for the Coast Guard to endorse the Certificate of Compliance with the name of each cargo in Table 4 (follows § 154.1872) that is listed on the IMO Certificate; however if a foreign flag existing gas vessel does not meet § 154.12 (b), (c), or (d), an IMO Certificate issued under the IMO “Code for Existing Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk, 1975” is not acceptable evidence of compliance with the requirements of this part for the endorsement of a Certificate of Compliance.
#### § 136.100 Purpose.

This part sets out the applicability for this subchapter and describes the requirements for obtaining and renewing a Certificate of Inspection (COI).
**Exhibit ITEM****31.2**

SECTION 302CERTIFICATION

I, BruceN. Warner certify that:

1.         I have read this annualreport on Form 10-KSB of Northern California Bancorp, Inc.;

2.         Based on my knowledge,this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.         Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisannual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report;

4.         The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)              designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;

b)             evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of theend of the period (the “Evaluation Date”); and

c)              presented in thisannual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.         The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee or registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)             any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 
| Date: March 22, 2007 | /s/ Bruce N. Warner           |   |
|----------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                 | Bruce N. Warner               |   |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer & |   |
|                 | Principal Accounting Officer  |   |

 

----
<Page>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

                      JOINT CO-CEO/CFO CERTIFICATE REQUIRED

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      Each of the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer of Coolbrands International Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Company's report on Form 20-F for
the fiscal year ended August 31, 2005, (the "Annual Report"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: February 28, 2006

                                           /s/ David J. Stein
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           David J. Stein
                                           Chief Executive Officer

                                           /s/ Gary P. Stevens
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Gary P. Stevens
                                           Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-10-098-CV

GARY MANN AND 							      APPELLANTS

JEFFREY MANN	

	V.

THE HONORABLE 								APPELLEES

JUDGE PHILLIP O. VICK, 

DENTON COUNTY, DENTON 

COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, 

AND BENNY PARKEY	

	------------

	FROM THE 211TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellants Gary Mann and Jeffrey Mann along with several other plaintiffs sued Judge E. Lee Gabriel along with Appellees The Honorable Judge Phillip O. Vick, Denton County, Denton County Sheriff’s Department, and Benny Parkey.  On November 24, 2009, the trial court signed a judgment dismissing all of the plaintiffs’ claims against Judge Gabriel in cause number 2008-30359- 211 and severing those claims into cause number 2009-30383-211.  Approximately one month later, the trial court set aside its November 24, 2009 judgment because two plaintiffs filed verified pleadings stating that they did not receive notice of the hearing.  The trial court thereafter held another hearing on Judge Gabriel’s motion to dismiss and granted it.  

	On March 30, 2010, this court received a document from appellants that was treated as a notice of appeal for both cause numbers 2008-30359-211 and 2009-30383-211.  Our clerk’s office assigned cause number 2008-30359-211 the appellate cause number 02-10-00098-CV and assigned cause number 2009-30383-211 the appellate cause number 02-10-00100-CV.  

	We thereafter notified appellants that we were concerned that we might not have jurisdiction over the appeal in 02-10-00098-CV because it appeared that there was no final judgment.  We stated that unless appellants or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, this appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  Gary did not file a response, and Jeffrey filed a response that did not provide a reasonable basis for continuing the appeal.

	Because there is no final judgment or appealable order in this appeal, we dismiss the appeal numbered 02-10-00098-CV for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

	The appeal numbered 02-10-00100-CV remains pending before this court.

								SUE WALKER

								JUSTICE

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: June 3, 2010
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

JACQUELINE SZAFRANSKI, 

Plaintiff, 

-vs.- Case No: 14-14288

 Hon. George Caram Steeh 

DELBERT SERVICES CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING 

DELBERT SERVICES CORPORATION’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS AND COMPEL ARBITRATION 

NOW COME Plaintiff and Defendant, by and through their respective 

counsel, who hereby stipulate to the entry of an order compelling Plaintiff to 

arbitrate this dispute, provided that the arbitration be conducted by the American 

Arbitration Association or JAMS pursuant to the chosen arbitration association’s 

consumer dispute rules and procedures; including the chosen arbitration 

association’s rules and procedures regarding the selection and appointment of the 

arbitrator. The parties also stipulate to the entry of an order dismissing this lawsuit 

without prejudice and without fees of costs to either party. 

/s/ Travis L. Shackelford /s/ Randall J. Groendyk 

TRAVIS L. SHACKELFORD RANDALL J. GROENDYK 

Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant 

22142 West Nine Mile Road P.O. Box 352 

Southfield, MI 48034 Grand Rapids, MI 49501 

T (248) 353-2882 (616) 336-6000 

tshackelford@creditor-law.com rjgroendyk@varnumlaw.com 

Case 2:14-cv-14288-GCS-MKM ECF No. 7 filed 03/18/15 PageID.147 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

JACQUELINE SZAFRANSKI, 

Plaintiff, 

-vs.- Case No: 14-14288

 Hon. George Caram Steeh 

DELBERT SERVICES CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________ 

ORDER REGARDING DELBERT SERVICES CORPORATION’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS AND COMPEL ARBITRATION 

The Court having received the parties’ Stipulation, and being otherwise fully 

advised in the premises;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Delbert Services Corporation’s Motion to 

Dismiss and Compel Arbitration is GRANTED in part. The parties are to arbitrate 

this dispute before the American Arbitration Association or JAMS pursuant to the 

chosen arbitration association’s consumer dispute rules and procedures, including 

the chosen arbitration association’s rules and procedures regarding the selection 

and appointment of the arbitrator. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is hereby dismissed without 

prejudice, and without fees or costs to either party. 

s/George Caram Steeh 

Hon. George Caram Steeh 

Dated: March 18, 2015 United States District Judge 

Case 2:14-cv-14288-GCS-MKM ECF No. 7 filed 03/18/15 PageID.148 Page 2 of 2
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

WAYNE R. MESSINGER, §

§

Complainant, §

§ DOCKET ID: FAA-2015-0253

v. § DOCKET NO: 16-15-01

§

CLOVER ACQUISITION CORPORATION §

d/b/a PEARLAND REGIONAL AIRPORT, §

§

Respondent. § 

AGREED MOTION TO EXTEND RESPONSE DATE

RESPONDENT CLOVER ACQUISITION CORPORATION, d/b/a PEARLAND 

REGIONAL AIRPORT (“Respondent” or “Pearland”) moves under 14 C.F.R. §16.19(c) to 

extend its deadline to respond to Complainant’s Appeal of the Director’s Determination of 

Wayne R. Messinger (“Complainant” or “Messinger”):

1. The Complainant emailed the Respondent’s Counsel on June 20, 2016 the Appeal 

of the Director’s Determination (the “Appeal”), which he indicated was dated May 26, 2016. 

Pearland is expected to file a response not later than July 11, 2016. See 14 C.F.R. §16.33(d).

2. Counsel for Respondent was on vacation until June 27, 2016, and therefore was 

unable to review the Appeal until after his return. Moreover, counsel for Respondent has three 

depositions scheduled within eight (8) days in Dallas and Orange, Texas, in a case currently set 

for trial in September 2016. Preexisting scheduling therefore would make it difficult for 

Respondent to file its Response to the Appeal by the July 11 deadline.
2

3. Moreover, the Appeal contains numerous allegations not raised in the initial 

complaint. Respondent needs time to evaluate the claims in order to provide a complete 

response.

4. Accordingly, Respondent respectfully requests that its deadline to respond to the 

Appeal be extended sixty (60) days, or to Friday, September 9, 2016. This extension is not 

intended for purposes of delay, but so that justice may be done.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, RESPONDENT CLOVER ACQUISITION 

CORPORATION, d/b/a PEARLAND REGIONAL AIRPORT hereby requests that the 

Administrator extend its deadline to submit a response to Complainant’s Appeal of the Director’s 

Determination Answer to September 9, 2016.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ James F. Parker, III

JAMES F. PARKER, III

Texas State Bar No. 24027591

jparker@lglawfirm.ccom

JOSE E. de la FUENTE

Texas State Bar No. 00793605

jdelafuente@lglawfirm.com

SHEILA B. GLADSTONE

Texas State Bar No. 07993550

sgladstone@lglawfirm.com

LLOYD GOSSELINK 

 ROCHELLE & TOWNSEND, P.C.

816 Congress Avenue, Suite 1900

Austin, Texas 78701

Telephone: (512) 322-5800

Facsimile: (512) 472-0532

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 6

th day of July, 2016, the foregoing was electronically filed 

via e-mail filing at 9-AWA-AGC-Part-16@faa.gov and United States Postal Service, First 

Class Mail to the following:

Wayne R. Messinger

P O Box 1710

Friendswood, Texas 77549

Ginevan4@gmail.com

/s/ James F. Parker, III

James F. Parker, III

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I hereby certify that I conferred with Complainant Wayne R. Messinger via email 

regarding the substance of the foregoing Motion. Complainant stated that he agreed to the 

relief requested in the Motion, and the Motion is submitted according to that agreement.

/s/ James F. Parker, III

James F. Parker, III
Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors




	





EXHIBIT 10.1







COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS







Effective January 1, 2005, Directors of the Company who are not in its employ shall be paid compensation as follows:




	 	1.	An annual fee of $50,000, due in equal quarterly installments at the end of each calendar quarter and payable in cash or deferred through contributions to the Kerr-McGee Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (“Plan”) or by a combination of the foregoing, as elected by each Director.





	 	2.	An attendance fee of $2,000 for each meeting attended, payable in cash or deferred through contributions to the Plan or by a combination of the foregoing, as elected by each Director. Meetings for which an attendance fee is appropriate shall include Board meetings; Board Committee and subcommittee meetings; meetings held by Committee chairs, the Lead Director or other Board members at the request of or on behalf of the Board or a Committee; and meetings held by Committee chairs or the Lead Director in advance of a Board or Committee meeting that involve substantial planning or that are not characterized as routine.





	 	3.	An annual fee of $12,000 for chairing the Audit Committee of the Board, payable in equal quarterly installments in cash or deferred through contributions to the Plan or by a combination of the foregoing, as elected by the Director.





	 	4.	An annual fee of $6,000 for chairing a Board Committee other than the Audit Committee, payable in equal quarterly installments in cash or deferred through contributions to the Plan or by a combination of the foregoing, as elected by the Director.





	 	5.	An annual fee of $30,000 for serving as Lead Director, payable in equal quarterly installments in cash or deferred through contributions to the Plan or by a combination of the foregoing, as elected by the Director.





	 	6.	Annual grants of stock and stock options to be made each year at the first regular meeting of the Board in the following amounts and on the terms specified in the then current Kerr-McGee Corporation Long Term Incentive Plan:





	 	(a)	1,500 shares of restricted common stock of Kerr-McGee Corporation; and





	 	(b)	4,000 options to purchase Kerr-McGee Corporation common stock.





Directors and officers periodically receive mementos in connection with meetings of the Board. Taxes payable on such items are paid by the Company and totaled less than $1,000 per person in 2004.
Editorial Note on Part 154
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 154.1345 Gas detection. ( a ) Each vessel carrying a cargo that is designated with an “I” or “I and T” in Table 4 must have: ( 1 ) A fixed flammable gas detection system that meets § 154.1350; and
( 2 ) Two portable gas detectors that can each measure 0 to 100% of the lower flammable limit of the cargo carried.
( b ) Each vessel carrying a cargo that is designated with a “T” or “I and T” in Table 4 must have: ( 1 ) Two portable gas detectors that show if the concentration of cargo is above or below the threshold limit value listed in 29 CFR 1910.1000 for that cargo; and
( 2 ) Fixed gas sampling tubes in each hold space and interbarrier space with: ( i ) The number of tubes specially approved by the Commandant (CG-OES);
( ii ) Each tube valved and capped above the main deck unless it is connected to a fixed toxic gas detector;
( iii ) If the vessel carries cargo that is heavier than the atmosphere of the space, each tube's open end in the lower part of the space;
( iv ) If the vessel carries cargo that is lighter than the atmosphere of the space, each tube's open end in the upper part of the space;
( v ) If the vessel carries cargo that is heavier than the atmosphere of the space and another cargo that is lighter than the atmosphere of the space, tubes with their open ends in the lower part of the space and tubes with their open ends in the upper part of the space; and
( vi ) If the vessel carries cargo that can be both heavier and lighter than the atmosphere of the space, tubes with their open ends in the lower part of the space and tubes with their open ends in the upper part of the space.
( c ) A vessel that carries methyl bromide or sulfur dioxide must have a fixed gas detection system that is not located in a gas-safe space.
( d ) A vessel that carries sulfur dioxide must have a fixed gas detection system that meets § 154.1350 except paragraph (j).
( e ) Each alarm under § 154.1350(e) on a vessel that carries methyl bromide or sulfur dioxide must be set at or below the threshold limit value listed in 29 CFR 1910.1000 for the cargo carried.
[CGD 74-289, 44 FR 26009, May 3, 1979, as amended by CGD 82-063b, 48 FR 4782, Feb. 3, 1983]
§ 15.505 Changes in the certificate of inspection. All requests for changes in manning as indicated on the COI must be sent to— ( a ) The Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection (OCMI) who last issued the COI; or
( b ) The OCMI conducting the inspection, if the request is made in conjunction with an inspection for certification.
[USCG-2006-24412, 81 FR 40100, June 20, 2016]