# C_2011269EN.01002901.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/29

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Förvaltningsrätten i Falun (Sweden) lodged on 27 June 2011 — Daimler AG v Skatteverket

(Case C-318/11)

2011/C 269/54

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Referring court

Förvaltningsrätten i Falun

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Daimler AG

Applicant:

Defendant: Skatteverket

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | How is the expression ‘fixed establishment from which business transactions are effected’ to be interpreted in an assessment on the basis of the relevant provisions of European Union law? (1) |
| --- | --- |

1.

How is the expression ‘fixed establishment from which business transactions are effected’ to be interpreted in an assessment on the basis of the relevant provisions of European Union law? (1)

1

| 2. | Is a taxable person who has the seat of his economic activity in another Member State and whose activity principally consists of the manufacture and sale of cars, who has carried out winter testing of car models at installations in Sweden, to be regarded as having had a fixed establishment in Sweden from which business transactions have been effected where that person has acquired goods and services that were received and used at testing installations in Sweden without having his own staff permanently stationed in Sweden and where the testing activity is necessary to the performance of the person’s economic activity in another Member State? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is a taxable person who has the seat of his economic activity in another Member State and whose activity principally consists of the manufacture and sale of cars, who has carried out winter testing of car models at installations in Sweden, to be regarded as having had a fixed establishment in Sweden from which business transactions have been effected where that person has acquired goods and services that were received and used at testing installations in Sweden without having his own staff permanently stationed in Sweden and where the testing activity is necessary to the performance of the person’s economic activity in another Member State?

| 3. | Does it affect the answer to question 2 if the taxable person has a wholly-owned Swedish subsidiary, the purpose of which is almost exclusively to supply the person with various services for that testing activity? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Does it affect the answer to question 2 if the taxable person has a wholly-owned Swedish subsidiary, the purpose of which is almost exclusively to supply the person with various services for that testing activity?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ L 347, 11.12.2006, p. 1), Eighth Council Directive 79/1072/EEC of 6 December 1979 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Arrangements for the refund of value added tax to taxable persons not established in the territory of the country (OJ L 331, 27.12.1979, p. 11), Council Directive 2008/9/EC of 12 February 2008 laying down detailed rules for the refund of value added tax, provided for in Directive 2006/112/EC, to taxable persons not established in the Member State of refund but established in another Member State (OJ L 44, 20.2.2008, p. 23).

1

---