alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Federal Bureau of Investigation

In accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Title 5, United States Code, Appendix and Title 41, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 101-6.1015, with the concurrence of the Attorney General, I have determined that the continuance of the Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Advisory Policy Board (APB) is in the public interest. In connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the FBI by law, I hereby give notice of the renewal of the APB Charter, effective February 23, 2007. 

The APB provides me with general policy recommendations with respect to the philosophy, concept, and operational principles of the various criminal justice information systems managed by the FBI's CJIS Division.

The APB includes representatives from state and local criminal justice agencies; members of the judicial, prosecutorial, and correctional sectors of the criminal justice community, as well as one individual representing a national security agency; a representative of federal agencies participating in the CJIS Systems; and representatives of criminal justice professional associations (i.e., the American Probation and Parole Association; American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors, Inc.; International Association of Chiefs of Police; National District Attorneys' Association; National Sheriffs' Association; Major Cities Chiefs' Association; Major County Sheriffs' Association; and a representative from a national professional association representing the courts or court administrators nominated by the Conference of Chief Justices). The Attorney General has granted me the authority to appoint all members to the APB. 

The APB functions solely as an advisory body in compliance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The Charter has been filed in accordance with the provisions of the Act. 

Dated: April 2, 2007. 

Robert S. Mueller, III, 

Director.

[FR Doc. 07-1818 Filed 4-11-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-02-M
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.174-7 Approval procedures. ( a ) *General.* A thermal protective aid is approved by the Coast Guard under the procedures in subpart 159.005 of this chapter.
( b ) *Approval testing.* Each approval test must be conducted in accordance with § 160.174-17.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

NIKOLLE NIKOLLAJ,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 14-13260

v.

Hon. John Corbett O’Meara

COMMISSIONER OF 

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder’s report and

recommendation dated June 30, 2015. Plaintiff Nikolle Nikollaj submitted

objections on July 14, 2015; the Commissioner of Social Security filed a response

on July 22, 2015. Plaintiff filed a reply brief on July 27, 2015.

The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment on the administrative

record in the case, which involves Plaintiff’s application for Social Security

disability benefits. Plaintiff received disability benefits between August 8, 2002,

and November 4, 2005; this case relates to Plaintiff’s alleged disability between

November 4, 2005, and September 30, 2007, when his insured status expired. In a

-1-

5:14-cv-13260-JCO-CEB Doc # 35 Filed 11/18/15 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 1957
decision dated January 8, 2013, the administrative law judge determined that

Plaintiff was not disabled during the relevant time period. 

The magistrate judge found that substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s

decision. The magistrate judge recommends that the court deny Plaintiff’s motion

for summary judgment and grant Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. 

With respect to reports and recommendations from magistrate judges, this court

“shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified

proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C). The court “may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the

findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” Id.

The court has reviewed Plaintiff’s objections in light of the complete

record.1

 In so doing, the court agrees with Magistrate Judge Binder’s assessment

that the ALJ’s decision is supported by substantial evidence.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Binder’s June

30, 2015 report and recommendation is ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment

is DENIED and Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.

1 The court also reviewed Magistrate Judge Pepe’s March 5, 2009 report and

recommendation in Case No. 02-73373, which remanded Plaintiff’s case for

further proceedings before the ALJ.

-2-

5:14-cv-13260-JCO-CEB Doc # 35 Filed 11/18/15 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 1958
s/John Corbett O’Meara 

United States District Judge

Date: November 18, 2015

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon

counsel of record on this date, November 18, 2015, using the ECF system.

s/William Barkholz 

Case Manager

-3-

5:14-cv-13260-JCO-CEB Doc # 35 Filed 11/18/15 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 1959
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             525
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,281
<ALLOWANCES>                                       192
<INVENTORY>                                      1,725
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,553
<PP&E>                                           3,288
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,239
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        834
<COMMON>                                         7,295
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,408
<SALES>                                         12,559
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,592
<CGS>                                            7,570
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     9
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,686)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (322)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,364)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,364)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.67)


</TABLE>
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cr-20780 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

CURTIS SCOTT, 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION 

UNDER 28 U.S.C. §2255 (ECF No. 643) 

 Defendant Curtis Scott has filed a pro se motion for leave to file a motion 

under 28 U.S.C. §2255. The motion is GRANTED. Scott may file a motion under 

28 U.S.C. §2255. Scott would be well-advised to research and understand how his 

pending direct appeal – including the issues he has raised in that appeal and the 

issues he has not raised in that appeal – may impact the issues he wishes to raise in 

his motion under 28 U.S.C. §2255. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

Dated: November 2, 2020 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

Case 2:14-cr-20780-MFL-DRG ECF No. 648, PageID.6099 Filed 11/02/20 Page 1 of 2
 2 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on November 2, 2020, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (810) 341-9764 

Case 2:14-cr-20780-MFL-DRG ECF No. 648, PageID.6100 Filed 11/02/20 Page 2 of 2
Mid Atlantic Planning Area

Undiscovered Technically Recoverable

Resources by Water Depth Range

25 mi

50 mi

75 mi

100 mi

200 m

800 m

1600 m

2400 m

September, 2008

Note:

Resource numbers in the

Atlantic area are estimates

based on1970s-1980s seismic

data and limited exploratory

wells. The numbers for these

bands in the Atlantic area, while

based on the best available

data, are highly speculative.

NJ

DE

MD

VA

NC

PA

WV

25 mi

50 mi

75 mi

100 mi

Water Depth Gas (Tcf) UTRR Oil (Bbbl) UTRR

0-200 meters 1.43 - 5.73 0.11 - 0.67

200-800 meters 1.20 - 5.09 0.10 - 0.69

800-1600 meters 0.65 - 3.73 0.05 - 0.41

1600-2400 meters 0.95 - 5.76 0.07 - 0.54

>2400 meters 1.22 - 7.23 0.09 - 0.64

Resource Estimates Based on MMS 2006 Assessment Data

Resource values are in trillion cubic feet of gas (Tcf)

and billion barrels of oil (Bbbl).
###### Editorial Note on Part 148

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59783, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 148.100 Log book entries.

During the transport in bulk of a material listed in Table 148.10 of this part, the master must keep a record of each temperature measurement and each test for toxic or flammable gases required by this part. The date and time of each measurement and test must be recorded in the vessel's log.
###### Editorial Note on Part 160

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 160.133-1 Scope.

This subpart prescribes standards, tests, and procedures for seeking Coast Guard approval of a release mechanism used for davit-launched and free-fall lifeboats approved under subpart 160.135 of this part, and rescue boats approved under subpart 160.156 of this part.
Exhibit 10.24


 


Amendment
to


HYCROFT
MINING CORPORATION


Restricted
stock unit agreement


(TIME-VESTING)


 


THIS AMENDMENT (the
 “Amendment”) to the Hycroft Mining Corporation Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Time-Vesting) by and between
Hycroft Mining Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”) and Randy Buffington (the “Participant”)
made and entered into as of February 20, 2019 (the “Agreement”) is made as of May 29, 2020 (the “Effective
Date”).


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, Hycroft
Mining Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) sponsors the Plan for the benefit of its employees
and its stockholders;


 


WHEREAS, the
Company has entered into that certain Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 13, 2020, as amended as of February 26,
2020, by and among the Company, Mudrick Capital Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“MUDS”) and
MUDS Acquisition Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation (each of MUDS and MUDS Acquisition Sub, Inc., a “Buyer”);


 


WHEREAS, the
Company has agreed to assign the Plan to a Buyer or one of their affiliates and the Buyers have agreed that a Buyer or an affiliate
will assume sponsorship of the Plan; and


 


WHEREAS, it
is desirable to amend the Agreement to reflect changes resulting from the foregoing.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
the Plan is hereby amended as of the Effective Date so that: (i) references to the “Corporation” in the Agreement
be revised to mean “Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation” and (ii) references to the “Plan” in the
Agreement be revised to mean the “Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation 2020 Performance and Incentive Pay Plan.”


 


[Signature page
to follow]


 






    


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date.


 


	 	HYCROFT MINING CORPORATION
	 
	 	By:	/s/ Stephen M. Jones
	 	 	Stephen Jones,
	 	 	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




 


		PARTICIPANT



 



	 	/s/ Randy Buffington
	 	Randy Buffington




 






    -2-
#### FANNIE ROTH, PLAINTIFF, v. ISIDORE BRUSSELL AND PHILIP BRUSSELL, PARTNERS, TRADING AS I. AND P. BRUSSELL, DEFENDANTS.

Decided October 16, 1929.

Before Gummere, Chief Justice, and Justices Parker and Bodine.

For the plaintiff-appellant, *Aaron L. Simon.*

For the defendant-appellees, *Frank G. Turner.*

Pee Curiam.

The plaintiff, Fannie Roth, recovered a verdict in the sum of $700 in an action in tort for personal injuries in the Passaic Circuit Court.

Our examination of the testimony leads us to the conclusion that the verdict of the jury is not against the clear weight of the evidence nor contrary to the charge of the court, or so clearly inadequate as to justify a new trial.

The rule will he dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          12,406                  22,050
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      823                   2,035
<ALLOWANCES>                                        60                     200
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,378                  24,079
<PP&E>                                           2,469                   3,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,773                   2,006
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,074                  25,397
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,671                   5,283
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        44,493                  44,410
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,090)                (24,296)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,074                  25,397
<SALES>                                          7,703                   8,631
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,703                   8,631
<CGS>                                            3,644                   3,562
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,644                   3,562
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,565                  15,311
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (887)                 (1,306)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,619)                 (8,936)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,619)                 (8,936)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,619)                 (8,936)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.20)                  (1.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.20)                  (1.07)


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 151
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 151 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49236, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 151.04-1 Certificate of inspection. ( a ) A certificate of inspection is required for every unmanned tank barge subject to the requirements in this subchapter. A certificate of inspection shall be issued to the barge or to its owners by the Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection, if the barge is found to comply with applicable inspection laws and the regulations in this chapter.
( b ) The certificate of inspection shall be endorsed with respect to the waters over which the barge may be operated.
( c ) The certificate shall be endorsed describing the cargoes by name as given in Table 151.05 or as specifically approved by the Commandant. No other dangerous cargo as defined in Subpart 151.01-1 shall be carried. Certificates shall specify maximum cargo weight (short tons), maximum density (pounds per gallon) and any operating limitations and a limiting draft.
[CGFR 70-10, 35 FR 3714, Feb. 25, 1970, as amended by CGD 88-100, 54 FR 40029, Sept. 29, 1989]
# C_2012065EN.01000203.xml

| 3.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/2

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Mönchengladbach (Germany) lodged on 2 November 2011 — Gisbert Thöne v MF Global UK Ltd and Frank Kucksdorf

(Case C-552/11)

2012/C 65/04

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Mönchengladbach

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Gisbert Thöne

Applicant:

Defendant: MF Global UK Ltd and Frank Kucksdorf

Defendant:

This Case was removed from the Register of the Court by Order of the Court of 8 December 2011.

---
EXHIBIT 31.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OR RULE 15D-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

I, Nehemia Kaufman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F of
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd (the "registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.





Date: January 6, 2005

/s/ Nehemia Kaufman
--------------------------------
Nehemia Kaufman, Chief Financial Officer


                                       23
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the
quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Form
10-QSB") of Community Shores Bank Corporation (the "Issuer").

         I, Jose' A. Infante, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Issuer, certify that:

         (i)      the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of
                  Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii)     the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Issuer.

Dated: August 14, 2002


                                              /s/ Jose' A. Infante
                                              ------------------------------
                                              Jose' A. Infante
                                              Chairman, President and Chief
                                              Executive Officer