alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

JOHN. P. GREINER, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cv-13979 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

CHARTER COUNTY OF 

MACOMB, MICHIGAN, a/k/a 

MACOMB COUNTY, et al., 

 Defendants. 

__________________________________________________________________ 

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF ##100 & 101) 

The Defendants in this action have filed motions for summary judgment. 

(ECF ##89 & 90.) Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file Answers to 

the motions. The request is GRANTED. Plaintiff may file his Answers to the 

motions by not later than 4:30 p.m. on Friday, April 14, 2017. Defendants may 

file their reply briefs by not later than 4:30 p.m. on Friday, May 5, 2017. Plaintiff is 

reminded that he must serve on defense counsel all documents that he files in 

opposition to the motions and that he must file proof of service reflecting such 

service. This is the final extension of time for Plaintiff to respond to the motions. 

No filing by Plaintiff in response to the motions will be accepted after 4:30 p.m. 

on Friday April 14, 2017. This extension, combined with the length of time the 
2 

Court previously gave Plaintiff to respond to the motions, has resulted in Plaintiff 

having far more time to respond than normally allowed under the Court's Local 

Rules. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: April 10, 2017 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on April 10, 2017, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5113
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                          48,250
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  294,469
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (17,850)
<INVENTORY>                                    360,566
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,010,139
<PP&E>                                       1,043,317
<DEPRECIATION>                               (251,718)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,970,471
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          837,333
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,125,718
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,992,580)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,970,471
<SALES>                                      1,675,131
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,001,999
<CGS>                                        1,001,999
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,614,676
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,941,544)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,940,744)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,902,742)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                       Exhibit 23.0 Consent of Olive LLP


                            [OLIVE LLP LETTERHEAD]




                       INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Citizens First Financial Corp.

We have issued our report dated January 19, 2001 accompanying the consolidated
financial statements of Citizens First Financial Corp. and Subsidiary appearing
in the Company's 2000 Annual Report to Stockholders. We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Citizens First
Financial Corp. on Form S-8 (Registration Statement Nos. 333-79389, 333-37925
and 333-41615) and in this Form 10-K of the aforementioned report.


Olive LLP


Decatur, Illinois
March 27, 2001
Editorial Note on Part 147
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 147 appear by USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59782, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 147.100 Radioactive materials. ( a ) Radioactive materials must not be brought on board, used in any manner, or stored on the vessel, unless the use of the materials is authorized by a current license issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) under 10 CFR parts 30 and 34.
( b ) Stowage of radioactive materials must conform to the requirements of the NRC license.
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.023-6 Container. ( a ) *General.* The container for storing the signals on lifeboats and liferafts is not required to be of a special design or be approved by the Coast Guard. The container must meet the requirements in Subpart 160.021 (§ 160.021-6) except that the wording on the container must be: “HAND COMBINATION FLARE AND SMOKE DISTRESS SIGNALS.”
( b ) [Reserved]
March 24, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JAMES E. ARCHER, JR. AND GIDGET ARCHER , Appellant s

NO. 14

- 14

- 00017

- CV V.

DDK HOLDINGS LLC, DI ANE E. CAMPBELL

, AND HAYES LEASING COMPANY, INC., INDIV IDUALLY AND D/B/A HA YES TRUCK GROUP

, Appellee s

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment signed September 24, 2013 in favor of appellee s Diane E. Campbell and Hayes Leasing Company, Inc., Individually and d/b/a Hayes Truck Group, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of th e court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant s James E. Archer, Jr. and Gidget Archer, jointly and severally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
§ 11.420 Service requirements for mate of ocean self-propelled vessels of less than 500 GRT. ( a ) The minimum service required to qualify an applicant for an endorsement as mate of ocean self-propelled vessels of less than 500 GRT is 2 years of total service in the deck department of ocean or near-coastal self-propelled, sail, or auxiliary sail vessels. Service on Great Lakes and inland waters may substitute for up to 1 year of the required service. One year of the required service must have been as a master, mate, or equivalent position while holding a license or endorsement as master, mate, or operator of uninspected passenger vessels. Six months of the required service as master, mate, or equivalent position must have been on vessels of more than 50 GRT.
( b ) A person holding this endorsement may qualify for an STCW endorsement, according to §§ 11.309, 11.317, 11.319, and 11.321 of this part.
Exhibit 32


Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report") by Nevstar Gaming and
Entertainment, Inc. the undersigned hereby certifies that:

       1.    The Report complies in all material respects with the requirements
             of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
             as amended, and

       2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Registrant.


                                        /s/ William O. Fleischman
                                        ___________________
                                        Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.188 Membrane tank: Inner hull steel.

For a vessel with membrane tanks, the inner hull plating thickness must meet the deep tank requirements of the American Bureau of Shipping published in “Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels”, 1981.

[CGD 74-289, 44 FR 26009, May 3, 1979, as amended by CGD 77-069, 52 FR 31630, Aug. 21, 1987]
N. Y. SUPERIOR COURT.

#### Elise Magnin agt. William B. Dinsmore, President, &c.

*Special*Term,

December, 1873.

Under the provisions of section 385 of the Code where a verdict obtained is not more favorable than an offer previously made by defendant, the costs accruing after the offer are to be taxed in favor of the defendant, the plaintiff’s costs being confined to the time prior to the offer.

Appeal from taxation of costs.

Plaintiff, upon the trial, had a verdict for eighty-seven dollars and forty cents, which was not more favorable than the one which the defendant had previously offered under section 385 of the Code to allow to be taken. The justice presiding at the trial therefore directed that the defendant recover all costs subsequent to the offer. Upon the taxation of these costs by the clerk, plaintiff claimed to be entitled to costs up to the time of the offer. The claim was allowed and defendant appealed.

Freedman, J.

In section 385 of the Code, as amended by chapter 479 of the Laws of 1851, page 903, the words, “ and if the plaintiff fail to obtain a more favorable judgment he cannot recover costs, but must pay the defendant’s costs,” are separated from the words, “ from the time of the offer,” by a comma, thus showing clearly that it was the intention of the legislature, which then, for the first time, enacted the prohibition of plaintiff’s recovery of costs in the cases comtemplated by said section, to enact that such prohibition should run from the time of defendant’s offer, and should not relate back as a penalty to the time of the commencement of the *298action. In *Burnett*agt. *Westfall*(15 *How.,*430) the same construction was adopted, notwithstanding the court failed to notice the existence of the comma above referred to.

It is true that the language of the section has been again amended, in respects not necessary to be noticed here, by chapter 824 of the Laws of 1866 *(vol.*2, *p.*1845), and that in the amendment, as published, the said comma has been omitted. But in view of the construction adopted by the supreme court, in *Burnett*agt. *Westfall,*of which the legislature of 1866 must be presumed to have been cognizant, this bare omission does not *per se*demand a different construction; and as the one previously adopted is the more equitable one, it should be retained.

The plaintiff having recovered a judgment for more than fifty dollars is the prevailing party; and as such he is entitled to costs under section 303. Under section 304 such costs are allowed to her, of course; but under the operation of section 385 they are to be confined to the time prior to the offer, and all costs which accrued subsequently are to be taxed in favor of the defendant. The costs to be taxed on either side include, as a matter of course, the necessary disbursements.

The taxation should be affirmed.
§ 159.010-1 Purpose. This subpart contains the following: ( a ) The standards and procedures under which the Coast Guard accepts an independent laboratory that a manufacturer proposes to use.
( b ) The standards and procedures under which a laboratory is accepted as a recognized laboratory under applicable subparts.
( c ) The circumstances under which the acceptance or recognition of a laboratory is terminated.
[CGD 93-055, 61 FR 13928, Mar. 28, 1996]
###### Editorial Note on Part 154

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 154 appear part 154 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50466, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, Oct. 1, 2012.

#### § 154.1862 Posting of speed reduction.

If a speed reduction is specially approved by the Commandant under § 154.409, the master shall ensure that the speed reduction is posted in the wheelhouse.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

MADELYN TERRELL

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No: 14-12794

PNC BANK, N.A.,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On April 16, 2015, the court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case

should not be dismissed. (Dkt. # 21.) Plaintiff Madelyn Terrell has failed to respond to

the Order by the court’s deadline of April 24, 2015. Accordingly, for the reasons stated

in the Order to Show Cause,

IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED, with prejudice, for the reasons

given in Defendant’s December 17, 2014 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Cooperate in

Discovery or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment and for failure to prosecute.

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: May 12, 2015

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, May 12, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C1 ORDERS\14-12794 TERRELL.dismiss.dmi.v2.wpd

2:14-cv-12794-RHC-DRG Doc # 22 Filed 05/12/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 331
Editorial Note on Part 153
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 153 appear by CGD-95-072, 60 FR 50465, Sept. 29, 1995, CGD-96-041, 61 FR 50732, Sept. 27, 1996, USCG-2009-0702, 74 FR 49235, Sept. 25, 2009, and USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59784, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 153.234 Fore and aft location. Except as allowed in § 153.7, each ship must meet the following: ( a ) Each cargo containment system and any compartments within which a containment system is located must be forward of a tankship's accommodation spaces.
( b ) Except as described in § 153.235, each cargo containment system must be located at least 0.05L aft of the forward perpendicular, but in no case forward of a collision bulkhead.
[CGD 73-96, 42 FR 49027, Sept. 26, 1977, as amended by CGD 81-101, 52 FR 7781, Mar. 12, 1987]
§ 139.120 Application for approval as a TPO. An organization, which may include a business entity or an association, desiring to be approved as a TPO under this part must submit a written request to the Towing Vessel National Center of Expertise, 504 Broadway St Suite 101, Paducah, KY 42001. The organization must provide the following information: ( a ) A description of the organization, including the ownership, structure, and organizational components.
( b ) A general description of the clients being served or intended to be served.
( c ) A description of the types of work performed by the organization or by the principals of the organization in the past, noting the amount and extent of such work performed within the previous 3 years.
( d ) Objective evidence of an internal quality system based on ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q9001-2000 (incorporated by reference, see § 136.112 of this subchapter) or an equivalent quality standard.
( e ) Organization procedures and supporting documentation that describe processes used to perform an audit and records to show system effectiveness.
( f ) Copies of checklists, forms, or other tools to be used as guides or for recording the results of audits and/or surveys.
( g ) Organization procedures for appeals and grievances.
( h ) The organization's code of ethics applicable to the organization and its auditors and/or surveyors.
( i ) A list of the organization's auditors and/or surveyors who meet the requirements of § 139.130. This list must include the experience, background, and qualifications for each auditor and/or surveyor.
( j ) A description of the organization's means of assuring continued competence of its personnel.
( k ) The organization's procedures for terminating or removing auditors and/or surveyors.
( l ) A description of the organization's means of assuring the availability of its personnel to meet the needs of the towing companies for conducting audits and surveys within the intervals established in this subchapter.
( m ) A description of the organization's apprentice or associate program for auditors and/or surveyors.
( n ) A statement that the Coast Guard may inspect the organization's facilities and records and may accompany auditors and/or surveyors in the performance of duties related to the requested approval.
( o ) Disclosure of any potential conflicts of interest.
( p ) A statement that the organization, its managers, and employees engaged in audits and/or surveys are not, and will not be involved in any activities which could result in a conflict of interest or otherwise limit the independent judgment of the auditor and/or surveyor or organization.
( q ) Any additional information that the applicant deems pertinent.
From: Muldoon, Albert (OST)

To: "lplacek@cityofalliance.net" ; "jdcox@cityofalliance.net" ; Wayne Anderson (manager@chadron-nebraska.com)

Cc: Shawn Simpson <shawn@boutiqueair.com> (shawn@boutiqueair.com) ; "david.schroeder@gemairflights.com" ;

"Mike Matthews" ; "Doug Voss" ; "Chuck Howell" ; "Kelly Carbone" ; Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) ;

"Planning@flyviaair.com"

Subject: RE: EAS at Alliance & Chadron, NE - Request for Comments - Due February 18, 2015

Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 11:01:00 AM

All,

We have received a request to extend the public comment period until March 4, 2015. We

find the request reasonable and have decided to grant it. Therefore, public comments

relating to the carrier selection decision at Alliance and Chadron, NE are now due no later

than March 4, 2015

.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Regards,

A.J.

From: Muldoon, Albert (OST)

Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 9:48 AM

To: 'lplacek@cityofalliance.net'; 'jdcox@cityofalliance.net'; 'kfischer@chadron-nebraska.com'; Wayne

Anderson (manager@chadron-nebraska.com); 'pfisher@chadron-nebraska.com'

Cc: Shawn Simpson <shawn@boutiqueair.com> (shawn@boutiqueair.com);

'david.schroeder@gemairflights.com'; 'Mike Matthews'; Doug Voss; Chuck Howell; 'Kelly Carbone';

Schlemmer, Kevin (OST)

Subject: EAS at Alliance & Chadron, NE - Request for Comments - Due February 18, 2015

All:

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Alliance and

Chadron, Nebraska, and give you an opportunity to submit comments on the record before

we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International

Affairs. In anticipation of the current contract’s expiration on May 31, 2015, the

Department issued Order 2014-11-10 (November 12, 2014) soliciting proposals from carriers

to provide EAS at Alliance and/or Chadron, NE, for a new contract period beginning June 1,

2015. In response to that Order, we received proposals from four carriers:

Great Lakes (the incumbent)

ViaAir

Gem Air

Boutique Air

I have attached a copy of each of the proposals to this email for your review. The proposals

will also soon be available online through the Federal Dockets Management System atwww.regulations.gov by entering “DOT-OST-2000-8322” in the search box.

Please carefully review the proposals and submit any comments you may have as soon as

possible, but no later than February 18, 2015

. Please send your comments via email to

EAS@dot.gov

. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions and please forward this

email to any relevant parties not included on this email.

Regards,

A.J.

A.J. Muldoon

Office of Aviation Analysis

U.S. Department of Transportation

albert.muldoon@dot.gov

(202) 366-1058
Presidential Documents

15007 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 60 

Thursday, March 29, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8116 of March 26, 2007 

Education and Sharing Day, U.S.A., 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

A future of hope and opportunity in America requires that all our children 

develop the knowledge and character they need in life. On Education and 

Sharing Day, we recognize our responsibility to ensure that our young people 

have the foundation necessary to lead lives rich in purpose and fulfillment. 

Education and Sharing Day honors the legacy of Rabbi Menachem Mendel 

Schneerson and emphasizes our commitment to teach the next generation 

of Americans the values that make our country strong. The Lubavitcher 

Rebbe believed that society should ‘‘make a new commitment to kindness,’’ 

and he helped to establish education and outreach centers offering social 

service programs and humanitarian aid around the world. 

The character of our young people is strengthened by serving a cause greater 

than self and by the anchor of virtues, including courage and compassion. 

By instilling a spirit of service in our children, we create a more optimistic 

future for them and our Nation. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim March 30, 2007, as 

Education and Sharing Day, U.S.A. I call upon government officials, educators, volunteers, and all the people of the United States to reach out 

to young people and work to create a better, brighter, and more hopeful 

future for all. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with MISCELLANEOUS
15008 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 60 / Thursday, March 29, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-sixth 

day of March, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtyfirst. 

[FR Doc. 07–1587 

Filed 3–28–07; 8:53 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with MISCELLANEOUSGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>