alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

(18U.S.C. 1350)

 

The undersigned, Sterling H.McDonald, Chief Financial Officer of Evolution Petroleum Corporation (the “Company”),certifies in connection with the filing with the Securities and ExchangeCommission of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year endedJune 30, 2007 (the “Report”)”) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge,that:

 

1. The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

2. The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this certification as of the 28th day of September,2007.

 
| * * | */s/*    | *STERLING  H. McDONALD*    |   |
|----------|----------|----------------------------|--------|
|     |     | *Sterling  H. McDonald*    |
| * * | * * | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1



Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George G. Andrews, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ George G. AndrewsGeorge G. Andrews, Chief Executive
Officer




May 17, 2004
**Exhibit 23.2****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.333-147866, No. 333-135822, 333-117885, No. 333-127716, No. 333-32161, No. 333-57573, No.333-86091, No. 333-45736, No. 333-67480, No. 333-97541 and No. 333-107700) of Iridex Corporation ofour report dated March 30, 2007, relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements and financial statement schedules as of December30, 2006 and the two years then ended, which appearsin this Form 10-K./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Editorial Note on Part 148
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 148 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59783, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 148.5 Alternative procedures. ( a ) The Commandant (CG-ENG-5) may authorize the use of an alternative procedure, including exemptions to the IMSBC Code (incorporated by reference, see § 148.8), in place of any requirement of this part if it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Coast Guard that the requirement is impracticable or unnecessary and that an equivalent level of safety can be maintained.
( b ) Each request for authorization of an alternative procedure must— ( 1 ) Be in writing;
( 2 ) Name the requirement for which the alternative is requested; and
( 3 ) Contain a detailed explanation of— ( i ) Why the requirement is impractical or unnecessary; and
( ii ) How an equivalent level of safety will be maintained.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Russell J. Howard, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge the Quarterly Report of Maxygen, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Maxygen, Inc.



By:

/s/ Russell J. HowardName:

Russell J. HowardTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDate:

May 6, 2005




I, Lawrence W.
Briscoe, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge the Quarterly Report of Maxygen, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Maxygen, Inc.



By:

/s/ Lawrence W. BriscoeName:

Lawrence W. BriscoeTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

May 6, 2005
#### § 11.601 Applicability.

This subpart provides for endorsement as radio officers for employment on vessels, and for the issue of STCW endorsements for those qualified to serve as radio operators on vessels subject to the provisions on the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) of Chapter IV of SOLAS (incorporated by reference, see § 11.102 of this part).
##### 



Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial
Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned officer of Party City Corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of
    the Company for the annual period ended June 28, 2003 (the
    Report) fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|
| | (ii) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                          



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ LINDA M. SILUK     
| |                        
| | Linda M. Siluk         
| | Chief Financial Officer

Dated: July 9, 2004

The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
#### § 111.30-3 Accessibility of switchboard components and connections.

Each component and bus bar connection on a switchboard that is not accessible from the rear, except a bus bar connection for a draw-out type circuit breaker, must be within 0.5 m (20 in.) of the front of the switchboard.
5:14-cr-20804-JCO-DRG   Doc # 37   Filed 04/14/16   Pg 1 of 1    Pg ID 320
Editorial Note on Part 160
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 160 appear by USCG-2012-0832, 77 FR 59785, 59786, Oct. 1, 2012.

§ 160.051-11 Equipment required for Coastal Service inflatable liferafts. In lieu of the equipment specified in § 160.151-21, the following equipment must be provided with a Coastal Service inflatable liferaft: ( a ) *Rescue quoit and heaving line.* One rescue quoit and a heaving line as described in § 160.151-21(a).
( b ) *Knife.* One knife, of a type designed to minimize the chance of damage to the inflatable liferaft and secured with a lanyard. In addition, an inflatable liferaft that is permitted to accommodate 13 persons or more must be provided with a second knife that is of the non-folding type. Any knife may be replaced with a jackknife meeting the requirements in 46 CFR 199.175(b)(16).
( c ) *Bailer.* One bailer as described in § 160.151-21(c).
( d ) *Sponge.* One sponge as described in § 160.151-21(d).
( e ) *Sea anchor.* One sea anchor as described in § 160.151-21(e).
( f ) *Paddles.* Two paddles of the same size and type as used to pass the maneuverability test in paragraph 1/5.10 of IMO Revised recommendation on testing (incorporated by reference, see § 160.051-5 of this subpart).
( g ) *Whistle.* One whistle as described in § 160.151-21(i) of this part.
( h ) *Flashlight.* One flashlight with spare batteries as described in § 160.151-21(m).
( i ) *Signalling mirror.* One signalling mirror as described in § 160.151-21(o).
( j ) *Survival instructions.* Instructions on how to survive as described in § 160.151-21(v).
( k ) *Instructions for immediate action.* Instructions for immediate action as described in § 160.151-21(w).
( l ) *Repair outfit.* One set of sealing clamps or plugs as described in § 160.151-21(y)(1).
( m ) *Pump or bellows.* One pump or bellows as described in § 160.151-21(z).
( n ) *Plugs for pressure-relief valves.* Plugs for pressure-relief valves as described in § 160.151-21(aa).
[CGD 85-205, 62 FR 25546, May 9, 1997. Redesignated and amended by USCG-2010-0048, 76 FR 62975, 62976, Oct. 11, 2011; USCG-2020-0107, 87 FR 68305, Nov. 14, 2022]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

KIM L. VICTOR,

Petitioner, Case No. 14-14926

v. Hon. John Corbett O’Meara

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Respondent.

_________________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO 

PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES 

AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT

Petitioner Kim L. Victor filed her complaint against the State of Michigan

and an application to proceed without prepayment of fees on December 29, 2014. 

The court finds Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis to be facially

sufficient and, therefore, grants Petitioner’s motion to proceed without prepayment

of fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); Gibson v. R.G. Smith Co., 915 F.2d 260, 262 (6th

Cir. 1990).

Once a court grants a plaintiff permission to proceed in forma pauperis, it

must review the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court “shall

dismiss” the case if the court finds that it is “(i) frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to

state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a

5:14-cv-14926-JCO-DRG Doc # 5 Filed 01/14/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 25
defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

Petitioner seeks a writ of coram nobis, which would serve to vacate her state

court conviction rendered in 2008. However, federal district courts “lack

jurisdiction to issue writs of coram nobis to set aside judgments of state courts.”

Finkelstein v. Spitzer, 455 F.3d 131, 134 (2d Cir. 2006) (citing cases). Because the

court lacks jurisdiction over Petitioner’s claim, it must dismiss her petition.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s application to proceed without

prepayment of fees is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s complaint is DISMISSED.

s/John Corbett O’Meara 

United States District Judge

Date: January 14, 2015

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the

parties of record on this date, January 14, 2015, using the ECF system and/or

ordinary mail.

s/William Barkholz 

Case Manager

-2-

5:14-cv-14926-JCO-DRG Doc # 5 Filed 01/14/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 26
# C_2011269EN.01003302.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/33

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif de Montreuil (France) lodged on 4 July 2011 — Santander Asset Management SGIIC SA, on behalf of Cartera Mobiliaria SA SICAV v Ministre du budget, des comptes publics, de la fonction publique et de la réforme de l’Etat

(Case C-339/11)

2011/C 269/65

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal administratif de Montreuil

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Santander Asset Management SGIIC SA, on behalf of Cartera Mobiliaria SA SICAV

Applicant:

Defendant: Ministre du budget, des comptes publics, de la fonction publique et de la réforme de l’Etat

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must the situation of the shareholders be taken into account together with that of undertakings for collective investments in transferable securities (UCITS)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must the situation of the shareholders be taken into account together with that of undertakings for collective investments in transferable securities (UCITS)?

| 2. | If so, what are the conditions under which the withholding tax at issue may be regarded as consistent with the principle of free movement of capital? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If so, what are the conditions under which the withholding tax at issue may be regarded as consistent with the principle of free movement of capital?

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

JACK SMITH,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO: 15-CV-10090-DT

MR. DOYLE, C. JOHNSON, 

T. CRAWFORD, D. SCOTT, AND

SEAN LOCKHART,

Defendants.

 / 

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

This matter was referred to United States Magistrate R. Steven Whalen pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In his report filed on July 5, 2017, the

magistrate judge recommended that this court grant Defendants Debra Skutt and Sean

Lockhart’s [Dkt # 40] Motion for Summary Judgment. He further recommended that

Defendant Cary Johnson be sua sponte dismissed with prejudice. No objections have been

filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived.1

Having reviewed the file and the report, the court concludes that the findings and

conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and ADOPTS the same for purposes of this

Order.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s

Report and Recommendation, Defendants’ [Dkt # 40] Motion for Summary Judgment is

GRANTED and that Defendants Debra Skutt and Sean Lockhart are DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE. 

 1The failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the court from its duty to

independently review the motion. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Cary Johnson is sua sponte DISMISSED

WITH PREJUDICE.

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: August 29, 2017

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record and/or

pro se parties on this date, August 29, 2017, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(810) 292-6522

2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 14-cr-20780 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

CURTIS SCOTT, 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT’S APPEARANCE 

On April 22, 2019, the Court scheduled an in-person status conference in this 

action for April 30, 2019, at 1:30 p.m. (See Notice, ECF #508.) Defendant Curtis 

Scott is ordered to personally appear at that conference. (See id.) Through this order, 

the United States Marshals Service is authorized to use the minimum amount of 

force necessary to ensure Scott’s appearance in Court for the scheduled status 

conference. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: April 22, 2019 
 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on April 22, 2019, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Monda 

 Case Manager 

 (810) 341-9764
South Atlantic Planning Area

Undiscovered Technically Recoverable

Resources by Water Depth Range

25 mi

50 mi

75 mi

100 mi

200 m

800 m

1600

m

2

4

0

0

m

September, 2008

Note:

Resource numbers in

the Atlantic area are

estimates based on

1970s-1980s seismic

data and limited

exploratory wells.

The numbers for these

bands in the Atlantic

area, while based on

the best available data,

are highly speculative.

SC

NC

GA

FL

25

mi

50

mi

7

5

mi

10

0

mi

Water Depth Gas (Tcf) UTRR Oil (Bbbl) UTRR

0-200 meters 0.39 - 1.55 0.03 - 0.17

200-800 meters 1.18 - 4.76 0.09 - 0.59

800-1600 meters 0.07 - 0.31 0.01 - 0.04

1600-2400 meters 0.02 - 0.09 0.00 - 0.01

>2400 meters 0.01 - 0.04 0.00 - 0.01

Resource Estimates Based on MMS 2006 Assessment Data

Resource values are in trillion cubic feet of gas (Tcf)

and billion barrels of oil (Bbbl).
#### § 142.100 Purpose.

This part contains requirements for fire suppression and detection equipment and arrangements on towing vessels.
§ 120.322 Multiple generators. When a vessel is equipped with two or more generators to supply ship's service power, the following requirements must be met: ( a ) Each generator must have an independent prime mover; and
( b ) The generator circuit breakers must be interlocked to prevent the generators from being simultaneously connected to the switchboard, except for the circuit breakers of a generator operated in parallel with another generator when the installation meets §§ 111.12-11(f), and 111.30-25(d) in subchapter J of this chapter.
### SERVED: 

## MAY 9, 2012

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THEMATTER OF 

### CORNERSTONEAVIATION, INC. FAADOCKETNo. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS No. FAA-2011-0481
IN THE MATTER OF 

### CORNERSTONEAVIATION, INC. FAADOCKETNo. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS No. FAA-2011-0484

IN THEMATTEROF 

### CORNERSTONE AVIATION, INC. FAADOCKETNo. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil PenaltyAction) FDMS No. FAA-2011-0489 

### y ... 

### 92 ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO FILE BRIEF Respondent Cornerstone Aviation, Inc. ("Respondent" or "Cornerstone") has requested additional time in these consolidated matters to file its reply brief. Citing the press of business, it asks that its deadline beset for July 3, 2012. Complainant Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant" or "the agency") had earlier proposed a schedule in which Respondent's reply brief would be due no later than 30 days after service of Complainant's brief. That brief was filed on April20, 2012. Complainant objects to the grant of a period longer than 30 days for Respondent to file its brief. Respondent's request will be granted. WHEREFORE, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Respondent's request for additional time to file its reply brief is GRANTED; 2. Complainant's objection is DENIED; 3. Respondent's reply brief in these matters will be due on July 3, 2012; and 4. Complainant's rebuttal brief, should it choose to file one, will be due on July 20, 2012. £rL_j**O,~·,fl** Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge, Attachment - Service List

" "

### SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000 1 

### ONE COPY Susan Horstman, ChiefExecutive Officer Cornerstone Aviation, Inc., 

### Respondent 337 North 2370 West #130 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 TEL: 801-355-2244 FAX: 801-355;.2754 Jeffrey M. Harper, 

### Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel Northwest MountainRegion, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-2161 FAX:**425-227~1007** The HonorableRichard C. Goodwin,



### AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M..;20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.R (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS Nos. FAA-2011- 0481, 0484 and 0489 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur WrightBuilding-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

Before 

CAMPANELLA, HERRING, and PENLAND 

Appellate Military Judges 

UNITED STATES, Appellee 

v. 

Specialist JOSE L. CUELLAR 

United States Army, Appellant 

ARMY 20150375 

Headquarters, U.S. Army Special Forces Command (Airborne) 

Deidra J. Fleming, Military Judge 

Lieutenant Colonel Terri J. Erisman, Staff Judge Advocate 

For Appellant: Colonel Mary J. Bradley, JA; Major Christopher D. Coleman, JA; 

Captain Payum Doroodian, JA (on brief). 

For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel A.G. Courie III, JA; Major Michael E. Korte, JA; 

Captain Austin L. Fenwick, JA (on brief). 

4 October 2016 

--------------------------------- 

SUMMARY DISPOSITION 

--------------------------------- 

This opinion is issued as an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent.

Per Curiam: 

 A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, 

pursuant to his plea, of possession of child pornography, in violation of Article 

134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (2012) [hereinafter 

UCMJ]. The military judge sentenced appellant to a dishonorable discharge, 

confinement for thirty-one months, and reduction to E-1. Pursuant to a pretrial 

agreement, the convening authority approved only so much of the adjudged 

sentence as provided for a dishonorable discharge, confinement for twenty-four 

months, and reduction to E-1. 

 This case is before us for review pursuant to Article 66, UCMJ. Appellant 

raised two assignments of error. Because we find a new action is required under one 

assignment of error, we do not address, at this time, the remaining assignment of 

error or matters raised personally by appellant pursuant to United States v. 

Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982). 
CUELLAR—ARMY 20150375 

2 

The government conceded that this case should be returned for a new action: 

The government submitted an undated “Action” which was 

signed by BG Xavier T. Brunson in his capacity as “acting 

commander.” A later promulgating order was signed on 

November 25, 2015 by CPT Chad Brinton “By Command 

of Major General James E. Kraft, Jr.” and attached to the 

record. BG Brunson was not the acting commander when 

he signed the document and therefore was not authorized 

to take action in this case. The appropriate commander to 

sign the action would have been MG Kraft, who was MG 

Darsie Rogers’s successor-in-command. 

We agree with both parties and hereby set aside the action and return the case 

for a new action. 

CONCLUSION 

Both the undated convening authority’s action and the action dated 25 

November 2015 are set aside. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate 

General for a new action by the same or a different convening authority in 

accordance with Article 60(c)-(e), UCMJ. 

 Senior Judge CAMPANELLA and Judge HERRING concur. 

FOR THE COURT: 

MALCOLM H. SQUIRES, JR. 

Clerk of Court 

MALCOLM H. SQUIRES, JR. 

Clerk of Court 

FOR THE COURT: